alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 410 

Establishing a McCain-Mansfield Fellowship Program in the Senate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 7, 2019 

Mr. JONES (for himself and Mr. ROUNDS) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Establishing a McCain-Mansfield Fellowship Program in the 

Senate. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. MCCAIN-MANSFIELD FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM. 

3 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this resolution— 

4 (1) the term ‘‘eligible military veteran’’ means 

5 a veteran, as defined in section 101 of title 38, 

6 United States Code, that meets any eligibility re7 quirements established by the Secretary for partici8 pation in the program under this section; and 

9 (2) the term ‘‘Sergeant at Arms’’ means the 

10 Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate. 

11 (b) ESTABLISHMENT OF FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM.— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 410 IS 

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—From amounts made avail2 able to carry out this section, the Sergeant at Arms 

3 shall establish a program through which eligible 

4 military veterans may apply for and participate in a 

5 fellowship position in the personal office of a Sen6 ator. 

7 (2) DESIGNATION.—The program established 

8 under paragraph (1) shall be referred to as the 

9 ‘‘McCain-Mansfield Fellowship Program’’. 

10 (3) ESTABLISHMENT OF AN OFFICE.—The Ser11 geant at Arms shall establish, in the Office of the 

12 Sergeant at Arms, an office to administer the 

13 McCain-Mansfield Fellowship Program. The office 

14 shall develop a process through which— 

15 (A) Senators who wish to participate in the 

16 McCain-Mansfield Fellowship Program may no17 tify the Sergeant at Arms; and 

18 (B) eligible military veterans may apply for 

19 a McCain-Mansfield Fellowship. 

20 (c) DURATION, NUMBER, DISTRIBUTION, AND

21 AMOUNT OF FELLOWSHIPS.— 

22 (1) DURATION.—A McCain-Mansfield Fellow23 ship shall be for a 2-year period. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 410 IS 

1 (2) NUMBER AND DISTRIBUTION OF FELLOW2 SHIPS.—Subject to the availability of appropria3 tions— 

4 (A) the Sergeant at Arms shall award not 

5 more than 100 McCain-Mansfield Fellowships; 

6 and 

7 (B) the Sergeant at Arms shall distribute 

8 the McCain-Mansfield Fellowships under this 

9 section for an award period in a manner that 

10 provides not less than 1 Fellowship position for 

11 each Senator wishing to participate in the pro12 gram. 

13 (3) AMOUNT OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE.—The 

14 Sergeant at Arms shall determine the stipend or 

15 other financial assistance appropriate for each par16 ticular McCain-Mansfield Fellowship position under 

17 this section, depending on the duties of the position 

18 and the recommendations from the Senator offering 

19 the position. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# C_2013344EN.01000802.xml

| 23.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 September 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Finland

(Case C-309/11) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Taxation - VAT - Directive 2006/112/EC - Articles 306 to 310 - Special regime for travel agencies - Differences between language versions - National legislation providing for the application of the special regime to persons other than travellers - Concepts of ‘traveller’ and ‘client’)

2013/C 344/11

Language of the case: Finnish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: L. Lozano Placios and I. Koskinen, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Finland (represented by: J. Heliskoski, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek, T. Müller and J. Očková, acting as Agents); Hellenic Republic (represented by: E.-M. Mamouna, acting as Agent); Kingdom of Spain (represented by: S. Centeno Huerta, acting as Agent); French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues and J.-S. Pilczer, acting as Agents); Republic of Poland (represented by: A. Kraińska, A. Kramarczyk, M. Szpunar and B. Majczyna, acting as Agents);

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Articles 306 to 310 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1) — National legislation under which the special regime for taxation of travel agents applies to transactions carried out by travel agents for recipients other than travellers

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs incurred by the Republic of Finland; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs incurred by the Republic of Finland;

| 3. | Orders the Czech Republic, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic and the Republic of Poland to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Czech Republic, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic and the Republic of Poland to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 252, 27.8.2011.

1

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 143 (Friday, July 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43528-43529]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-17455]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Intelligent Transportation Systems Program Advisory Committee; 
Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: ITS Joint Program Office, Office of the Assistant Secretary for 
Research and Technology, U.S. Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Program Advisory 
Committee (ITSPAC) will hold a meeting on August 13, 2014, from 8:00 
a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (EDT) at the Key Bridge Marriott Hotel, 1401 Lee 
Highway, Arlington, VA 22209.
    The ITSPAC, established under Section 5305 of Public Law 109-59, 
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A 
Legacy for Users, August 10, 2005, and re-established under Section 
53003 of Public Law 112-141, Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st 
Century, July 6, 2012, was created to advise the Secretary of 
Transportation on all matters relating to the study, development, and 
implementation of intelligent transportation systems. Through its 
sponsor, the ITS Joint Program Office (JPO), the ITSPAC makes 
recommendations to the Secretary regarding ITS Program needs, 
objectives, plans, approaches, content, and progress.
    The following is a summary of the meeting tentative agenda: (1) 
Call to Order and Roll Call, (2) Opening Remarks, (3) Committee Member 
Introductions, (4) ITS JPO Briefing and Group Discussion, (5) Committee 
Topics of Interest Discussion, (6) Committee Organization Discussion, 
and (7) Summary and Next Steps.
    The meeting will be open to the public, but limited space will be 
available on a first-come, first-served basis. Members of the public 
who wish to present oral statements at the meeting must request 
approval from Mr. Stephen Glasscock, the Committee Designated

[[Page 43529]]

Federal Official, at (202) 366-9126, not later than August 6, 2014.
    Questions about the agenda or written comments may be submitted by 
U.S. Mail to: U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the 
Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology, ITS Joint Program 
Office, Attention: Stephen Glasscock, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., HOIT, 
Washington, DC 20590 or faxed to (202) 493-2027. The ITS JPO requests 
that written comments be submitted not later than August 6, 2014.
    Notice of this meeting is provided in accordance with the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act and the General Services Administration 
regulations (41 CFR part 102-3) covering management of Federal advisory 
committees.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on the 21st day of July 2014.
John Augustine,
Managing Director, ITS Joint Program Office.
[FR Doc. 2014-17455 Filed 7-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

May 11, 2023

In the Matter of

TOP Financial Group Limited,

File No. 500-1

ORDER OF SUSPENSION OF

TRADING

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of TOP Financial Group 

Limited (“TOP”) (CIK No. 0001848275), an active Canary Islands corporation located at 118 

Connaught Road West Room 1101, Hong Kong, HK with a class of securities registered with the 

Commission pursuant to Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) Section 12(b).

There has been observed recent, unusual, and unexplained market activity, including an 

increase in TOP’s stock price over a three-day period, April 26-28, 2023, from $6.72 per share to 

$256.44 intraday per share. This market activity, the Commission believes, was not preceded or 

accompanied by any statements by the company. On April 28, 2023, TOP issued a press release 

stating that TOP “is aware of recent stock movement and cautions its investors to rely solely on 

press releases issued by the Company and Company’s annual report and other filings with the 

United States Securities and Exchange Commission.” The Commission is of the opinion that the 

public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of 

TOP. Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 
2

that trading in the securities of TOP is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on May 12, 

2023, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on May 25, 2023.

By the Commission.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary
### EPAX140701100163951 

## X
PPXP120622354273551 D1493P P120425 Jun 22, 2012 CDX 

## X XXX XXX XXX XXX

XXX XXX

XXX XXX XXX XXX 

## X XXX XXX XXX XXX

XXX XXX

XXX XXX XXX XXX

XXX XXX



## X SANITIZED SUBMISSION

## X

XXX SANITIZED SUBMISSION001 EPA Letter (P-12-0425) (Interim Results - 28-

Day Inhalation) (7-1-2014) (public) EPA Letter (P-12-0425) (Interim Results - 28-Day Inhalation) (7-1- 3 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

## ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number 001 Attachment Name EPA Letter (P-12-0425) (Interim Results - 28-Day Inhalation) (7-1-2014) (public)



## Associated PMN Section Number

N/A Does not contain CBI 

## Report Number EPAX140701100163951 SANITIZED SUBMISSION
p.1 

OAR Box 1413 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

91)11-1-92 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/9/2008 3:11:24 PM Sheet 91 of 114 
ra-•••<•*jn--

ptfff.3-7*; »?<-*,-»- *>" <-*T^. ^ 

|||[TTTjm a 

A-^-5 ^ 

tr-r-<rx 

aril's Business Directory 

i *,. *\ i:< 

ISSN 1044-7024 

\/' 

'

:

':V;^i 

W73i:\ 

1364 

p'-f i f^/' 

- / 

MANUFACTURING 

USA 

fef%C Industry Analyses, 

Statistics, and Leading Companies 

Fifth Edition 

• A comprehensive guide to economic activity in 458 

manufacturing industries 

• Provides unique analysis and synthesis of federal statistics 

• Includes more than 21,000 top manufacturing corporations 

taken from Ward's Business Directory of U.S. Private 

and Public Companies 

Volume 1 

SIC 2011-329 9 

Arsen J. Darnay, Editor 

GALE 

DETROIT • NEW YORK • TORONTO • LONDON 

* ' 

'JAN I 9 200! 

EPA AIR DOCKET 

K
Editorial Note on Part 635
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 635 appear at 67 FR 75924, Dec. 10, 2002.

§ 635.107 Participation by disadvantaged business enterprises. ( a ) The State DOT shall schedule contract lettings in a balanced program providing contracts of such size and character as to assure an opportunity for all sizes of contracting organizations to compete. In accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, subsequent Federal-aid Highway Acts, and 49 CFR part 26, the State DOT shall ensure equal opportunity for disadvantaged business enterprises (DBEs) participating in the Federal-aid highway program.
( b ) In the case of a design-build, a CM/GC, or an ID/IQ project funded with title 23 funds, the requirements of 49 CFR part 26 and the State's approved DBE plan apply.
[67 FR 75925, Dec. 10, 2002, as amended at 81 FR 86942, Dec. 2, 2016; 85 FR 72931, Nov. 16, 2020]
#### § 971.202 Applicability.

The provisions in this subpart are applicable to the FS, the Federal Highway Administration, and the State DOTs that are responsible for satisfying these requirements for management systems pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 204.
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 21.1





                                GTI CORPORATION

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT





Valor Electronics, Inc., a California corporation

Valor East Electronics, Ltd., a Hong Kong corporation and wholly-owned
subsidiary of Valor Electronics, Inc.

Barnfinch, Ltd., a Hong Kong corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Valor
Electronics, Inc.

Valor Electronics GmbH, a German corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of
Valor Electronics, Inc.

Valor Europe, Ltd., United Kingdom corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of
Valor Electronics, Inc.

Valor Electronics Philippines, Inc., a Philippines corporation and wholly-owned
subsidiary of Valor Electronics, Inc.

Val Pan Am, S.A., a Mexican corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Valor
Electronics, Inc.

Sierracin, S.A., a Mexican corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Valor
Electronics, Inc.

Valor Electronics Investments BV, a Netherlands corporation and wholly-owned
subsidiary of Valor Electronics, Inc.

Valor Electronics Cayman, Inc., a Cayman Islands corporation and wholly-owned
subsidiary of Valor Electronics, Inc.
Evolution of Advice

Service ADVICE SPECTRUM OF PERSONALIZATION Advice

Data spectrum of 

personalization

TECHNOLOGY

(AI/MACHINE LEARNING)

Customer

custodial data

“I understand the 

information in 

your account”

Provider-owned 

data on customer

“I understand 

where and how 

you engage with 

us”

Customer selfaggregated data

“I understand 

your whole 

financial picture”

Enriched, thirdparty data

“I can learn more 

about you from 

others”

Unstructured data 

on customer

“I understand 

more about you 

as a person” EXAMPLES

SERVICING 

ACCOUNTS PROMPTING ACTION CONSTRUCTING AND MANAGING PORTFOLIOS

Personalized 

servicing

Customer tracking 

and routing

Virtual assistants

Money movement, 

trade confirmation

eSignature, 

eDelivery

Push notifications Defaulting Financial planning

nudges Next-best action

Notifications on 

market news, 

market movements

Fraud alerts

Appointment 

notifications

Auto-enrollment, 

auto-increases

Brokerage account 

features, e.g., 

default margin 

service

Notifications based 

on insights into 

portfolio/account to 

personalize 

experience or 

encourage further 

planning

Trading 

enticements, e.g., 

CUSIPs to consider

Portfolio 

rebalancing

Tax-loss 

harvesting Robo advice

Goal-based 

planning, asset 

allocation, 

diversification tools

Rebalancing to 

target allocation(s)

Managing “held 

away” assets

Tax-loss harvesting 

software

Investor profile 

questionnaire

Auto-investing, 

auto-rebalancing
----

(2004/C 88 E/0401)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2256/03

by Maurizio Turco (NI) to the Commission

(8 July 2003)

Subject:   Violations of religious freedom with regard to Pentecostal Church evangelists in Belarus

Knowing that:

In view of the excellent economic and commercial cooperation relations between the European Union and Belarus, can the Commission say:

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(8 August 2003)

The September 1997 Council Resolution on Belaras concluded that the EC and their Member States would conclude neither the interim agreement nor the Partnership and Co-operation Agreement with Belarus and that implementation of Community and Member states technical assistance programmes would be halted, except in the case of humanitarian or regional projects or those which directly support the democratisation process.

The Commission is certainly concerned by the application of the law ‘On liberty of conscience and religious organisations’ in Belarus. The Union has expressed these concerns in the Organisation on Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE).

The Commission would like to reiterate that it attaches great importance to the rights of freedom of religion, belief and expression. The Union has repeatedly affirmed that human rights and democratisation must form an integral part of all political dialogues with third countries. Religious freedom, as one of the fundamental human rights, as well as the rights of religious minorities are thus addressed through the EUs bilateral political dialogues, and, when appropriate, through démarches and public declarations, as well as through Union action in fora such as the United Nations Commission on Human Rights or the Third Committee of the United Nations General Assembly.

The Commission remains committed to supporting freedom of religion and Human Rights in Belarus, in close co-operation with Member States, the Council of Europe, OSCE and the United Nations and will continue to raise the issue with Belarus in all possible fora.

----
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

RANDALL EDWARDS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 3435

[ February 6, 2020 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County ; Michael C. Heisey

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 472001CF000171A

.

Randall Edwards, Bowling Green, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

L EVINE , C.J., W ARNER an d C ONNER , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2013009EN.01001501.xml

| 12.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 November 2012 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-244/11) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Articles 43 EC and 56 EC - Scheme under which prior authorisation is required for the acquisition of voting rights representing 20 % or more of the share capital in certain ‘strategic public limited companies’ - Arrangements for ex post control of certain decisions taken by those companies)

2013/C 9/22

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: E. Montaguti and G. Zavvos, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: P. Mylonopoulos and K. Boskovits, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — National legislation under which prior approval is required for the acquisition of voting rights corresponding to 20 % or more of the total share capital in companies of national strategic importance — Breach of Articles 49 TFEU and 63 TFEU

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by laying down the requirements referred to in Article 11(1), read in conjunction with Article 11(2), and those referred to in Article 11(3) of Law 3631/2008 on the creation of a national fund for social cohesion, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 43 EC on the freedom of establishment; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by laying down the requirements referred to in Article 11(1), read in conjunction with Article 11(2), and those referred to in Article 11(3) of Law 3631/2008 on the creation of a national fund for social cohesion, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 43 EC on the freedom of establishment;

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 219, 23.07.2011.

1

---
CS 319611-D1 09/18/2020

Seis pasos para limpiar y desinfectar su escuela de

forma adecuada 

Proteja su escuela contra el COVID-19 

Limpiar y desinfectar adecuadamente las superficies y los objetos puede ayudar a reducir de manera segura y 

eficaz la propagación de enfermedades en su escuela o establecimiento. 

cdc.gov/coronavirus

✓ Siempre use guantes y otro equipo de protección personal (EPP) que sean adecuados para los

productos químicos que se estén utilizando. Este EPP puede incluir protección para los ojos.

✓ Los productos de limpieza y desinfección no deben ser usados por los estudiantes ni cerca de ellos.

✓ Asegúrese de que haya una ventilación (circulación de aire) adecuada cuando use productos químicos

para prevenir que usted u otras personas inhalen vapores tóxicos.

Paso 1: 

Consulte 

epa.gov/listn o 

escanee el código 

QR con su teléfono 

para ver la lista 

de desinfectantes 

aprobados por la EPA.

Paso 3: 

Limpie las superficies y 

determine cómo se 

van a desinfectar las 

diferentes áreas.

Paso 5: 

Bote los guantes 

después de limpiar y 

desinfectar. Lávese las 

manos con agua y 

jabón por al menos 

20 segundos.

Paso 2: 

Siga cuidadosamente 

las instrucciones que 

aparecen en 

la etiqueta.

Paso 4: 

Siga el tiempo de 

contacto que aparece 

en la etiqueta.

Paso 6: 

Guarde los productos 

químicos en un lugar 

seguro lejos del 

alcance y la vista de 

los estudiantes.
§ 51.30 Action on communications from individuals or groups. ( a ) If there has already been a submission received of the change affecting voting brought to the attention of the Attorney General by an individual or group, any evidence from the individual or group shall be considered along with the materials submitted and materials resulting from any investigation.
( b ) If such a submission has not been received, the Attorney General shall advise the appropriate jurisdiction of the requirement of section 5 with respect to the change in question.
### §441o. Facilities for interpretation of park and history of Sioux Nation; conveyance of reservation lands; submission of terms to Congressional committees

The Oglala Sioux Tribe may convey and the Secretary of the Interior may acquire not to exceed forty acres of tribally owned lands on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation for the purpose of erecting thereon permanent facilities to be used to interpret the natural phenomena of the park and the history of the Sioux Nation: Provided, That no such conveyance shall be made until sixty days after the terms thereof have been submitted to the Interior and Insular Affairs Committees of the House of Representatives and the Senate.

(Pub. L. 90–468, §6, Aug. 8, 1968, 82 Stat. 666; Pub. L. 95–625, title VI, §611, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3521.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Word "park" substituted in text for "monument" pursuant to Pub. L. 95–625, §611, which is classified to section 441e–1 of this title and which redesignated Badlands National Monument as Badlands National Park.

Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs of the Senate abolished and replaced by Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate, effective Feb. 11, 1977. See Rule XXV of Standing Rules of the Senate, as amended by Senate Resolution No. 4 (popularly cited as the "Committee System Reorganization Amendments of 1977"), approved Feb. 4, 1977.

Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs of the House of Representatives changed to Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives on Jan. 5, 1993, by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Third Congress.
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 200 9-0 819

DCN: SE00544

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS I NFORMATION

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.