alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          71,340
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  433,163
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     54,633
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               562,287
<PP&E>                                       5,691,809
<DEPRECIATION>                                 405,426
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,848,670
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          676,314
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,219
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,847,781
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,848,670
<SALES>                                      1,445,559
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,445,559
<CGS>                                        1,223,801
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,508,873
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,680
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (89,793)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (89,793)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (89,793)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.015)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.015)


</TABLE>
### §551a. Cooperation by Secretary of Agriculture with States and political subdivisions in law enforcement

The Secretary of Agriculture, in connection with the administration and regulation of the use and occupancy of the national forests and national grasslands, is authorized to cooperate with any State or political subdivision thereof, on lands which are within or part of any unit of the national forest system, in the enforcement or supervision of the laws or ordinances of a State or subdivision thereof. Such cooperation may include the reimbursement of a State or its subdivision for expenditures incurred in connection with activities on national forest system lands. This section shall not deprive any State or political subdivision thereof of its right to exercise civil and criminal jurisdiction, within or on lands which are a part of the national forest system.

(Pub. L. 92–82, Aug. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 303.)
# f9- Off/; 3TM Ttf£ ftWSTT M Jk f^rX/^ COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS AUG 03 2015 

## KoN^D fhl ^cMt^^^bM< AbelAcoBla.Ctertc

3 Pro Ss_ #a^ i«*4^.trt^' «"> iNvc &4?o^<_ 5^y '«-*{ fl^ nw/Mbt/-^ 

### f<L^sh tik*-t d*-*- fa A*'< TMPZ6&MT ^±+4-pt• Jhi\u4- T&.& p
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4731 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4731

 To authorize the deviation from service level requirement of military 
aircraft operating outside of designated Department of Defense airspace 
in the wilderness areas in mountainous regions if necessary to maintain 
                           safety of flight.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 17, 2019

  Mr. Tipton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the deviation from service level requirement of military 
aircraft operating outside of designated Department of Defense airspace 
in the wilderness areas in mountainous regions if necessary to maintain 
                           safety of flight.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Aviation Training Safeguard 
Act''.

SEC. 2. SAFE TRANSIT EXCEPTION TO SERVICE LEVEL REQUIREMENTS FOR 
              DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AIRCRAFT FLYING OVER WILDERNESS 
              AREAS.

    (a) In General.--Military aircraft operating outside of designated 
Department of Defense airspace in the wilderness areas in mountainous 
regions may deviate from service level requirements if necessary to 
maintain safety of flight, as determined by the Secretary of Defense.
    (b) Regulations.--The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that all 
Department of Defense regulations and flight procedures are in 
accordance with subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal C 148/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 148 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 502 July 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 148

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 502 July 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2007/C 148/01 | Special Report No 2/2007 concerning the Institutions’ expenditure on buildings together with the Institutions’ replies | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Court of Auditors

2007/C 148/01

Special Report No 2/2007 concerning the Institutions’ expenditure on buildings together with the Institutions’ replies

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
DISMISS and Opinion Filed June 27, 2024 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-24-00422-CV 

IN THE INTEREST OF A.M., A CHILD 

On Appeal from the 422nd Judicial District Court 

Kaufman County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 109355-422 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Pedersen, III, and Justice Carlyle 

Opinion by Chief Justice Burns 

On May 7, 2024, we sent a letter to the parties questioning our jurisdiction 

over this appeal because this Court lacks jurisdiction over the direct appeal of a 

contempt order. We directed appellant to file a letter brief addressing our 

jurisdictional concern no later than May 20, 2024. We expressly cautioned appellant 

that failure to do so might result in the dismissal of the appeal without further notice. 

To date, appellant has not filed a letter brief nor further corresponded with the Court 

regarding the status of this appeal. 

 
 –2– 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c). 

240422F.P05 

 

/Robert D. Burns, III/

ROBERT D. BURNS, III 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

IN THE INTEREST OF A.M., A 

CHILD 

No. 05-24-00422-CV 

 On Appeal from the 422nd Judicial 

District Court, Kaufman County, 

Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 109355-422. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice 

Burns. Justices Pedersen, III and 

Carlyle participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is 

DISMISSED. 

Judgment entered June 27, 2024
[J-1-2018]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF 

PENNSYLVANIA, CARMEN FEBO SAN 

MIGUEL, JAMES SOLOMON, JOHN 

GREINER, JOHN CAPOWSKI, 

GRETCHEN BRANDT, THOMAS 

RENTSCHLER, MARY ELIZABETH 

LAWN, LISA ISAACS, DON LANCASTER, 

JORDI COMAS, ROBERT SMITH, 

WILLIAM MARX, RICHARD MANTELL, 

PRISCILLA MCNULTY, THOMAS 

ULRICH, ROBERT MCKINSTRY, MARK 

LICHTY, LORRAINE PETROSKY,

Petitioners

v.

THE COMMONWEALTH OF 

PENNSYLVANIA; THE PENNSYLVANIA 

GENERAL ASSEMBLY; THOMAS W. 

WOLF, IN HIS CAPACITY AS 

GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA; 

MICHAEL J. STACK III, IN HIS CAPACITY 

AS LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF 

PENNSYLVANIA AND PRESIDENT OF 

THE PENNSYLVANIA SENATE; MICHAEL

C. TURZAI, IN HIS CAPACITY AS 

SPEAKER OF THE PENNSYLVANIA 

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES; 

JOSEPH B. SCARNATI III, IN HIS 

CAPACITY AS PENNSYLVANIA SENATE 

PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE; ROBERT 

TORRES, IN HIS CAPACITY AS ACTING 

SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH 

OF PENNSYLVANIA; JONATHAN M. 

MARKS, IN HIS CAPACITY AS 

COMMISSIONER OF THE BUREAU OF 

COMMISSIONS, ELECTIONS, AND 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 159 MM 2017
[J-1-2018, 159 MM 2017] - 2

LEGISLATION OF THE PENNSYLVANIA 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

DISSENTING OPINION

JUSTICE BAER

Throughout these proceedings, it has been my position that the Pennsylvania 

Congressional Redistricting Act of 2011 should apply to the impending 2018 election. 

While I have expressed my misgivings with allowing an election to proceed based upon 

a constitutionally-flawed map, I continue to conclude that the compressed schedule failed 

to provide a reasonable opportunity for the General Assembly to legislate a new map in 

compliance with the federal Constitution’s delegation of redistricting authority to state 

legislatures. U.S. CONST. art. I, § 4. 

My skepticism regarding the time allotted the Legislature has been borne out. 

Democracy generally, and legislation specifically, entails elaborate and time-consuming 

processes. Here, regardless of culpability, the Legislature has been unable to pass a 

remedial map to place on the Governor’s desk for signature or veto. Under these 

circumstances, Pennsylvania and federal law permit the use of the existing, albeit 

unconstitutional, map for one final election. See Butcher v. Bloom, 203 A.2d 556, 568-69 

(Pa. 1964) (citing Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of State of Colorado, 377 U.S. 

713, 739 (1964)).

Accordingly, I cannot join this Court's order adopting a new judicially-created 

congressional redistricting map for this year's primary and general elections. I emphasize 

that my inability to join the Court's order in no way reflects any opinion on the specific 

remedial map adopted.
### §543. Mono Basin National Forest Scenic Area; establishment

The area in the Mono Basin within and adjacent to the Inyo National Forest in the State of California, as generally depicted on a map entitled "Mono Basin National Forest Scenic Area" dated June 1983, and numbered 1983–3, is hereby designated as the Mono Basin National Forest Scenic Area (hereafter in sections 543 to 543h of this title referred to as the "Scenic Area"). Such map shall be on file and available for public inspection in the office of the Forest Supervisor, Inyo National Forest and in the office of the Chief of the Forest Service, Department of Agriculture. The Secretary of Agriculture (hereinafter in sections 543 to 543h of this title referred to as the "Secretary") may make minor revisions in the boundary of the Scenic Area after publication of notice to that effect in the Federal Register and submission of notice thereof to the Committee on Natural Resources of the United States House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the United States Senate. Such notice shall be published and submitted at least sixty days before the revision is made.

(Pub. L. 98–425, title III, §301, Sept. 28, 1984, 98 Stat. 1632; Pub. L. 103–437, §6(d)(33), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4584.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–437 substituted "Natural Resources" for "Interior and Insular Affairs" after "Committee on".
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 391 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 391

  Reaffirming a strong commitment to U.S. producers and American-made 
                              commodities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 31, 2019

 Mr. Tester submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
         the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Reaffirming a strong commitment to U.S. producers and American-made 
                              commodities.

Whereas the U.S. farmers and ranchers raise the best meat in the world;
Whereas Americans should have the right to knowingly buy made in America 
        products;
Whereas American farmers, ranchers, workers and consumers benefit from 
        transparency on the origin of food;
Whereas Congress overwhelmingly supported Country-of-Origin Labeling (COOL) in 
        the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-246; 122 
        Stat. 1651) because 87 percent of consumers want to know the country of 
        origin of their meat;
Whereas in 2015, Congress repealed the Country-of-Origin Labeling (COOL) law for 
        beef and pork, reducing the competitive advantage of products born, 
        raised, and slaughtered in the U.S.;
Whereas there is no standardized definition of the term ``truth in labeling'', 
        disadvantaging American producers;
Whereas Congress supports American products, and consumers deserve the right to 
        know where their food comes from;
Whereas the United States has the highest phytosanitary standards in the world 
        while other countries place less emphasis on food safety;
Whereas foreign commodities, like beef and pork, are misleadingly labeled 
        ``Product of USA'' if they are processed or packed in the United States;
Whereas technological advancements make it possible to accurately and 
        efficiently identify the origin of beef and pork without costly 
        segregation of imported and domestic commodities;
Whereas this gives producers and consumers the ability to identify true American 
        products from foreign imported meat; and
Whereas Country-of-Origin labeling is good for farmers, ranchers, workers, and 
        packers, because it allows them to identify their products as born and 
        raised in the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate supports legislation to reinstate 
Country-of-Origin labeling for pork and beef to allow consumers to make 
an informed and free choice about where their food comes from.
                                 <all>
```
### §463. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, act Aug. 21, 1935, ch. 593, §3, 49 Stat. 667; Pub. L. 91–383, §9, Aug. 18, 1970, as added Pub. L. 94–458, §2, Oct. 7, 1976, 90 Stat. 1940; amended Pub. L. 95–625, title VI, §604(2), Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3518; Pub. L. 101–628, title XII, §§1211, 1212, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4507; Pub. L. 104–333, div. I, title VIII, §814(f)(1), Nov. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 4197; Pub. L. 109–156, §5, Dec. 30, 2005, 119 Stat. 2948; Pub. L. 110–161, div. F, title I, Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 2107; Pub. L. 111–8, div. E, title I, Mar. 11, 2009, 123 Stat. 710, established the National Park System Advisory Board and the National Park Service Advisory Council. See sections 102303 and 102304 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00285

- CR

Jason Clay DOTSON

, Appellant

v.

The State

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR10439

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED July 15, 2015.

_____________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 428 

Authorizing the taking of pictures and filming in the Chamber of the Senate 

for use by the Capitol Visitor Center. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2019 

Mr. BLUNT (for himself and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the taking of pictures and filming in the 

Chamber of the Senate for use by the Capitol Visitor Center. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF TAKING OF PICTURES AND 

3 FILMING IN THE SENATE CHAMBER FOR USE 

4 BY THE CAPITOL VISITOR CENTER. 

5 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—Subject to subsection (b), 

6 paragraph 1 of rule IV of the Rules for the Regulation 

7 of the Senate Wing of the United States Capitol and Sen8 ate Office Buildings (prohibiting the taking of pictures in 

9 the Senate Chamber) is temporarily suspended— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 428 ATS 

1 (1) for the purpose of permitting the taking of 

2 pictures and filming while the Senate is in session 

3 or in recess; and 

4 (2) for a period not to exceed a total of 7 days, 

5 of which the dates, locations, and times shall be de6 termined by the Committee on Rules and Adminis7 tration. 

8 (b) LIMITATION ON USE OF IMAGES.—The pictures 

9 taken and film made under subsection (a) may only be 

10 used by the Capitol Visitor Center for exhibits, digital 

11 interactive displays, and video presentations in the Capitol 

12 Visitor Center that have been approved by the Committee 

13 on Rules and Administration. 

14 (c) ARRANGEMENTS.—The Capitol Visitor Center, in 

15 collaboration with the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper 

16 of the Senate and the Secretary of the Senate, shall make 

17 the necessary arrangements to carry out this resolution, 

18 including such arrangements as are necessary to ensure 

19 that the taking of pictures and filming conducted under 

20 this resolution does not disrupt any proceeding of the Sen21 ate. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
### §460l–8. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 88–578, title I, §6, formerly §5, Sept. 3, 1964, 78 Stat. 900; renumbered §6, Pub. L. 92–347, §2, July 11, 1972, 86 Stat. 459; amended Pub. L. 93–303, §2, June 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 194; Pub. L. 94–422, title I, §101(3), Sept. 28, 1976, 90 Stat. 1314; Pub. L. 95–625, title VI, §606, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3519; Pub. L. 99–645, title III, §303, Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3587; Pub. L. 103–322, title IV, §40133, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1918; Pub. L. 103–437, §6(p)(2), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4586; Pub. L. 104–333, div. I, title VIII, §814(d)(1)(H), Nov. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 4196, related to financial assistance to States. See sections 200301(2) and 200305 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.

A prior section 6 of Pub. L. 88–578 was renumbered section 7 and was classified to section 460l–9 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 113–287.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<CIK>                                  0000046043
<NAME>                                 Harvey Electronics, Inc.
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-START>                         OCT-27-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           NOV-01-1997
<CASH>                                       10,033
<SECURITIES>                                200,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               292,436
<ALLOWANCES>                               (20,000)
<INVENTORY>                               3,559,778
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          4,151,903
<PP&E>                                    1,383,518
<DEPRECIATION>                              179,604
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            7,314,125
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     2,937,115
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       396,037
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                     22,578
<OTHER-SE>                                1,616,649
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              7,314,125
<SALES>                                  15,398,290
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         15,470,942
<CGS>                                     9,764,755
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             6,706,180
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          325,219
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (1,325,212)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (1,325,212)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                            (1,325,212)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (0.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0
        


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of William C. Midgley, an Attorney, Resignor.

[823 NYS2d 702]

Voluntary resignation accepted and name removed from roll of attorneys *(see Matter of Manown,*240 AD2d 83 [1998]). Present—Scudder, J.P., Gorski, Green, Pine and Hayes, JJ. (Filed Oct. 2, 2006.)
#### § 804.2 Delegation of authority.

The Director of CSOSA hereby delegates to the Director of PSA the authority to accept and use gifts in the form of in-kind contributions of space and hospitality to support defendant programs, and of equipment and vocational training services to educate and train defendants in accordance with the requirements of this part. This delegation of authority may not be further delegated.
### §430pp. Fort Necessity National Battlefield; acquisition of land

In furtherance of the purposes of the Act of March 4, 1931 (46 Stat. 1522), the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to acquire by purchase, exchange, donation, with donated funds or otherwise by such means as he may deem to be in the public interest, lands and interests in lands adjoining or near the Fort Necessity National Battlefield site which in his discretion are necessary to preserve the historic battleground, together with not to exceed 25 acres at the detached Braddock Monument: Provided, That the total area acquired pursuant to sections 430pp to 430tt of this title shall not exceed 500 acres, except that in order to avoid the undesirable severance of parcels in private ownership such parcels may be purchased in the entirety.

(Pub. L. 87–134, §1, Aug. 10, 1961, 75 Stat. 336.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of March 4, 1931 (46 Stat. 1522), referred to in text, was not classified to the Code.
Treat yourself to healthy foods and get 

enough sleep

Take care of your body and get moving to lessen 

fatigue, anxiety, or sadness 

Find new ways to safely connect 

with family and friends, get 

support, and share feelings

320352-K

Older Adults: Care for yourself one small way each day

Engage in creative social activities like painting, 

gardening, or new hobbies.

cdc.gov/coronavirus Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

Disaster Distress Hotline: 1-800-985-5990 or text TalkWithUs to 66746