alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET OF STONE FIELD MANAGEMENT COMPANY AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND THE
RELATED  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS  AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE NINE MONTHS THEN ENDED
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John De Vito, Appellant.

No opinion. Present—Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.
Order entered June 19, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01693-CV

RXEDO CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,

Appellant

V.

AMERIPLAN CORPORATION, A TEXAS CORPORATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 429-04146-2009

ORDER

We abated this appeal on March 13, 2014 to allow the parties an opportunity to settle. By 

motion filed June 17, 2014, the parties inform us they have settled and move to dismiss the 

appeal. Accordingly, we REINSTATE the appeal. The motion to dismiss will be determined 

separately.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
#### Board of Education of Paulding County *v.*Paulding County Grand Jury.

Fish, C. J.

1. The act of August 22, 1907 (Acts 1907, p. 100), amending the act of August 21, 1906 (Acts 1900, p. 61), contains the following provision: “The failure on the part of any board of education to'perform the duties required by this act shall be immediately inquired into by the first grand jury sitting after such neglect of duty; and if said grand jury should find that any member or members of said board have failed to perform their duty, it shall report the same to the judge of the superior court, who shall cause a rule nisi to issue against such member or members, and they shall, be heard by the judge in their own behalf; if said member or members can not give a good and sufficient reason why they have not performed their duties as required by this act, they shall be discharged, and the said judge shall fill the vacancies until the next grand jury shall meet.” *Eeld,*that the exercise of the power to hear the members of the board of education and to discharge them, if they do not give a good and sufficient reas on why they have not performed their duties as required by the act, and to fill the va*840candes thus caused until the meeting of the next grand jury, is not a judgment of the superior court to which a bill of exceptions may be filed, bringing such action, to this court for review. *Carter*v. *Janes,*96 *Ga.*280 (23 S. E. 201). See also *Harris*v. *Sheffield,*128 *Ga.*299 (57 S. E. 305).

July 15, 1910.

Removal from office. Before Judge Edwards. Paulding superior court.

March 27, 1909.

*R. E. L. Whitworth,*for plaintiff in error.

*W.*K. *Fielder, solicitor-general,*contra.

2. A bill' of exceptions having been signed and filed, assigning error upon such action of the judge, the writ of error will be dismissed, on motion, for want of jurisdiction in this court to hear and determine the questions thus raised.

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*AH Hie Justices concur.*
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 13, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 13, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15I0227. BRIAN SUMMERS, TRUSTEE OF THE SUMMERS FAMILY LIVING

TRUST v. EDWARD L. WASDIN et al. .

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this

order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

14CV0245
### §450kk–1. Establishment; publication in Federal Register; additional properties

Upon a determination of the Secretary of the Interior that sufficient land and other property have been acquired by the United States for national-monument purposes, as provided in section 450kk of this title, such property shall be established as the "Fort Union National Monument" and thereafter shall be administered by the Secretary of the Interior in accordance with the laws and regulations applicable to national monuments. An order of the Secretary, constituting notice of such establishment, shall be published in the Federal Register.

Following establishment of the national monument, additional properties may be acquired as provided in section 450kk of this title, which properties, upon acquisition of title thereto by the United States, shall become a part of the national monument: Provided, That the total area of the national monument established pursuant to this section and section 450kk of this title shall not exceed one thousand acres, exclusive of such adjoining lands as may be covered by scenic easements.

(June 28, 1954, ch. 401, §2, 68 Stat. 299.)
#### Cora E. Kidder, Respondent, v. International Railway Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
AGREEMENT

Between:			Harrell Hospitality Group, Inc ("HHG")

					And

				London & Boston, plc (Cybertec Holdings) ("L&B")

Dated:				October 8, 2001

The parties agree as follows:

HHG will sell to L&B 2,045,567 shares in Energy Technique ("ET") at 3.3 pence per share for a total consideration of $100,000.

HHG will have the right to repurchase these shares for a 6 month period, at a price of 3.63 pence per share.

HHG can extend the right to repurchase these ET shares at 3.63 pence per share, beyond the initial 6 months, for a further 6 months, upon payment of a fee of 10% of the purchase price of the ET shares being sold hereunder.

Time is the essence to this Agreement.

Agreed to:

By HHG						By L&B

   //Geoffrey G. Dart//	   //Stephen Komlosy//   
Geoffrey G. Dart					Stephen Komlosy
Chairman						Chairman
1 

CCOutreach BD National Seminar 

February 8, 2011 

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 

Washington, DC 

Registration and Continental Breakfast (7:30 a.m. – 9:00 a.m.) 

I. Welcome and Opening Remarks (9:00 a.m. – 9:35 a.m.) 

Mary L. Schapiro, Chairman, SEC 

Richard G. Ketchum, Chairman and CEO, FINRA 

Carlo di Florio, Director, SEC Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations 

II. Dodd-Frank Legislation (9:35 a.m. – 11:00 a.m.) 

SEC and FINRA staff discuss the impact of the legislation on broker-dealers, municipal 

advisors and security swap-based entities. 

Norm Champ, Deputy Director, SEC Office of Compliance Inspections and 

Examinations (moderator)

James Brigagliano, Deputy Director, SEC Trading and Markets 

Thomas Selman, Executive Vice President, FINRA Regulatory Policy 

Networking Break (11:00 a.m. – 11:30 a.m.) 

III. Anti-Money Laundering Compliance (11:30 a.m. – 12:30 p.m.) 

SEC, FINRA and CCOs discuss issues related to due diligence and beneficial ownership, 

independent testing, omnibus and master/subaccount arrangements and direct market 

access, as well as the challenges associated with building a risk-based AML compliance 

program. 

Lourdes Gonzales, Assistant Chief Counsel for Sales Practice, SEC Trading and Markets 

(moderator)

Mark Cresap, President, Cresap, Inc. 

Jeff Halperin, Vice President, MetLife 

Joseph Hanvey, Executive Director, Nomura Securities International, Inc. 

Michael Rufino, Senior Vice President and Deputy, FINRA Member Regulation Sales 

Practice 

Lunch (12:30 p.m. – 2:00 p.m.) 
2 

IV. Examination Priorities and Process (2:00 p.m. – 3:15 p.m.) 

SEC and FINRA panelists discuss examination priorities and highlight common findings. 

CCOs address how their firms prepare for an effective examination and how they use 

examination results to enhance their compliance programs. Panelists also discuss the 

custody/asset verification process and expectations. 

Susan Axlerod, Executive Vice President, FINRA Member Regulation Sales Practice

(moderator) 

Thomas Horack, Chief Compliance Officer, John Hancock Financial Network 

Sarah Sherck, Managing Director and Chief Compliance Officer, Avondale Partners 

Joy Thompson, Associate Regional Director, SEC Philadelphia Regional Office

Kathy VanNoy-Pineda, Executive Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer, LPL 

Financial 

Networking Break (3:15 p.m. – 3:45 p.m.) 

V. Electronic Communications (3:45 p.m. – 4:45 p.m.) 

SEC, FINRA and CCOs discuss compliance considerations associated with electronic 

communications, including recordkeeping requirements, supervision of social media and 

advertising review. 

John Walsh, Associate Director – Chief Counsel, SEC Office of Compliance Inspections 

and Examinations (moderator) 

Nathan Headrick, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Counsel, CNL Securities 

Corp. 

Robert Mooney, Chief Compliance Officer, Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC

Joseph Price, Senior Vice President, FINRA Corporate Financing / Advertising 

Regulation 

VI. Closing Remarks (4:45 p.m. – 5:00 p.m.) 

Carlo di Florio, Director, SEC Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

Norfolk Division 

________________________________ 

 ) 

IN RE: ) Misc. Proceeding 16-00703-SCS 

 ) 

EDRIE A. PFEIFFER, ESQUIRE ) 

 ) 

 ) 

________________________________) 

EDRIE PFEIFFER’S MOTION TO CONTINUE 

THE FINAL HEARING IN THIS MATTER PENDING 

THE RESOLUTION OF TWO CASES PENDING IN THE WESTERN DISTRICT 

 Edrie A. Pfeiffer hereby moves this Court to continue a hearing on the merits of the 

pending Order to Show Cause issued on September 27, 2016 against her until the completion of 

two cases pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Virginia; 

i.e., Robbins v. Morgan, et. al., Case No. 16-5014 and Robbins v. Delafield, et al., Case No. 16-

7024. 

Date: December 14, 2016 Respectfully submitted, 

 EDRIE A. PFEIFFER, ESQUIRE 

By Counsel 

/s/ Bernard J. DiMuro_ 

DIMUROGINSBERG, P.C. 

Bernard J. DiMuro (VSB No. 18784) 

1101 King Street, Suite 610 

Alexandria, Virginia 22314 

Tel: (703) 684-4333 

Fax: (703) 548-3181 

bdimuro@dimuro.com 

 

Counsel for Defendant 

Case 16-00703-SCS Doc 15 Filed 12/14/16 Entered 12/14/16 12:26:43 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that on December 14, 2016, I electronically filed the foregoing with the 

Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notice of such filing to counsel of 

record that are registered with CM/ECF. 

 

/s/ Bernard J. DiMuro_ 

Bernard J. DiMuro (VSB No. 18784) 

Case 16-00703-SCS Doc 15 Filed 12/14/16 Entered 12/14/16 12:26:43 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
The web site for NIH Audio Reports makes extensive use of Java and Teleport Pro was unable to replicate the site. The audio broadcast for 2005-2012 are found in: W:\netsite-docs\gpo7345\gpo7345\ocplmedia.od.nih.gov\nihradio. The transcripts are found in: W:\netsite-docs\gpo7345\gpo7345\www.nih.gov\news\radio.
#### § 92.12 Program funding length.

Funding for these programs will be for one year only, but will allow for two additional years of no-cost extension.
§ 571.54 Determination of indigency by U.S. Magistrate Judge—inmates in contract community-based facilities or state institutions. ( a ) Inmates with a committed fine, or fine and costs may be transferred to contract community-based facilities, state institutions as boarders, or state institutions for service of federal sentences running concurrently with state sentences.
( b ) Inmates with a committed fine, or fine and costs may be committed directly to contract community-based facilities or state institutions as boarders or may be designated to state institutions for service of federal sentences running concurrently with state sentences.
( c ) An inmate with a committed fine, or fine and costs who is imprisoned in a contract community-based facility or state institution and desires to make application for a determination of ability to pay the committed fine, or fine and costs under 18 U.S.C. 3569 may make application directly to the U.S. Magistrate Judge.
( d ) Upon receipt of a finding by the U.S. Magistrate Judge that the inmate is not indigent, Bureau staff shall forward a referral package to the appropriate United States Attorney for a final determination as to the inmate's ability to pay the committed fine, or fine and costs.
[63 FR 4357, Jan. 28, 1998]
### §460y–3. Procedure for establishment

The Secretary shall establish the Area after a period of at least ninety calendar days from and after the date that he has (1) submitted copies of the program required by section 460y–2 of this title to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Governor of the State of California, and the governing body of the county or counties in which the area is located and (2) published a notice of intention to establish the area in the Federal Register and in at least two newspapers which circulate generally within the Area.

(Pub. L. 91–476, §4, Oct. 21, 1970, 84 Stat. 1068.)
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 20571 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
GERARDO ZAVALA

- AMADOR, also known as Gerardo Zavala, also known as Gerardo Amador Zavala, also known as Geraro Amador Zavala, also known as Rogelio Ayala

- Garcia , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13

- CR

- 323

- 1

Before PRADO, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Gerardo Zavala

- Amador appeals the 57

- month sentence imposed following his conviction for illegal reentry. He contends that the district court erred in treating his prior conv iction for indecency with a child under Texas Penal Code § 21.11(a)(1) as a cri me of violence within the meaning of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) and an agg ravated felony within the meaning of 8 U.S.C.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 8, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-20571 Document: 00512860773 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/08/2014No. 13

- 20571
§ 1 101(a)(43) . His arguments are foreclosed by our decisions in United States v. Elizondo

- Hernandez , 755 F.3d 779, 781

- 82 (5th Cir. 2014), and United States v. Rodriguez , 711 F.3d 541, 560, 562 n.28 (5th Cir.) (en banc) , cert. denied , 134 S. Ct. 512 (2013)

. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 13-20571 Document: 00512860773 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/08/2014
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 446 

Authorizing the printing of tributes and other related materials in honor 

of the late Senator Janet Kay Hagan. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 4, 2019 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the printing of tributes and other related 

materials in honor of the late Senator Janet Kay Hagan. 

1 Resolved, That there be printed as a Senate document 

2 a compilation of tributes and other related materials con3 cerning the Honorable Janet Kay Hagan, late a Senator 

4 from the State of North Carolina. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.9

                                   AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                            ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT
                                       OF
                    CALDERA, SYSTEMS, INC. AND CALDERA, INC.


     This Amendment to that certain Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of
September 1, 1998 (the "Agreement") by and between Caldera Systems, Inc., a Utah
corporation ("Purchaser") and Caldera, Inc., a Utah corporation ("Seller") is
dated and effective as of September 1, 1998.

     1.   The Agreement is hereby amended by striking and deleting the first
sentence of Section 1.3 as it presently exists and substituting for and in lieu
thereof the following:

     1.1  Purchase Price and Allocation of Purchase Price. Subject to upward
     adjustment as provided in this Section 1.3, the purchase price for the
     Asset (the "Purchase Price") shall be Nineteen Million Nine Hundred Twenty
     Eight Thousand Eight Hundred Forty Eight and no/100 Dollars $19,928,848.00
     and the Purchase Price shall be allocated to the Assets as set forth on
     Exhibit "H" attached hereto.

     2.   The Agreement is hereby amended by adding a new subsection (c) in
Section 1.4 as follows:

     and (c) by canceling $4,928,848.00 of indebtedness owed by seller to the
     Canopy Group, Inc. and which indebtedness has then been assigned by the
     Canopy Group, Inc. to the purchaser.

     3.   The Agreement is hereby amended by striking and deleting the Section
1.6 as it presently exists and substituting for and in lieu thereof the
following:

     1.6  Documentation of Sale of Inventory and Tangible Personal Property. At
     the Closing Seller shall execute and deliver to Purchaser the Bill of Sale
     attached hereto as Exhibit "A" (the "Bill of Sale") to evidence and effect
     the transfer of the inventory and other tangible personal property
     identified in Exhibit "A".

     4.   The Agreement is hereby amended by striking and deleting subsection
(i) entitled "Accounts Receivable" under Section B, of the Recitals.

     5.   Except as herein amended, the Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to the Asset
Purchase Agreement as of the day above first written.



                    CALDERA SYSTEMS, INC.



                    By: /s/ RANSOM H. LOVE
                        ----------------------------

                    Title: President/CEO
                           -------------------------


                    CALDERA, INC.

                    By: /s/ Bryan Sparks
                        ----------------------------

                    Title: CEO
                           -------------------------
<PAGE>   1


EXHIBIT 21
                                HECHINGER COMPANY
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                               STATE OF
NAME                                                                                         INCORPORATION
----                                                                                         -------------
<S>                                                                                          <C> 
A)   Hechinger Company (has 4 direct subsidiaries)                                               Delaware
     (1) Hechinger Stores Company (has 2 direct subsidiaries)                                    Delaware
       a.  Hechinger Stores East Coast Company                                                   Delaware
       b.  Hechinger Investment Company of Delaware, Inc. (has 5 direct subsidiaries)            Delaware
         (1)  Hechinger Royalty Company                                                          Delaware
         (2)  HIDS, Inc.                                                                         Delaware
         (3)  HQ Southwest, LLC                                                                  Delaware
         (4)   HQ Partners L.P. (1% owned by Hechinger Investment Company of Delaware, Inc.
              as General Partner, and 99% owned by HQ Southwest, LLC as Limited Partner          Delaware
         (5)  HQ MidAtlantic, LLC                                                                Delaware
     (2) Hechinger International, Inc.                                                           Delaware
     (3) Hechinger Property Company                                                              Delaware
     (4) Hechinger Financial Holdings Company  (has 9 direct subsidiaries)                       Delaware
         (a)  Hechinger Finance Inc.                                                             Delaware
         (b)  Pennsy, Inc.                                                                       Delaware
         (c)  HS Square, Inc.                                                                    Delaware
         (d)  Hechinger Towers Company                                                           Delaware
         (e)  PhilProp Holding Company                                                           Pennsylvania
         (f)  ManProp Holding Company                                                            Virginia
         (g)  BucksProp Holding Company                                                          Pennsylvania
         (h)  HProp, Inc.                                                                        Delaware
         (i)  RemProp, Inc.                                                                      Delaware
</TABLE>