42030 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 138 / Tuesday, July 20, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

increase in onroad mobile source 

emissions that can be considered for 

transportation conformity purposes is 

well within the safety margins of the 

ozone maintenance demonstration. 

Further, once allocated to mobile 

sources, these safety margins will not be 

available for use by other sources. 

C. 2005 Comprehensive Emissions 

Inventory 

As discussed above, section 172(c)(3) 

of the CAA requires nonattainment 

areas to submit a comprehensive, 

accurate and current inventory of actual 

emissions. As part of Michigan’s 

redesignation request for the Allegan 

County area, the State submitted a 2005 

emissions inventory. This inventory is 

discussed above in section VI.A.3.b. and 

summarized in Table 2. EPA is 

proposing to approve this 2005 

inventory as meeting the section 

172(c)(3) emissions inventory 

requirement. 

VII. What actions is EPA taking? 

EPA is proposing to determine that 

the Allegan County, Michigan area has 

attained the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. 

EPA is proposing to approve the 

redesignation of the Allegan County 

area from nonattainment to attainment 

for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. 

After evaluating the redesignation 

request submitted by Michigan, EPA 

believes that the request meets the 

redesignation criteria set forth in section 

107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA. The final 

approval of this redesignation request 

would change the official designation 

for the Allegan County area from 

nonattainment to attainment for the 

1997 8-hour ozone standard. EPA is also 

proposing to approve the maintenance 

plan SIP revision for the Allegan County 

area. EPA’s proposed approval of the 

maintenance plan is based on the State’s 

demonstration that the plan meets the 

requirements of section 175A of the 

CAA, as described more fully above. 

EPA is proposing to approve MDNRE’s 

2005 emissions inventory for the 

Allegan County area as meeting the 

requirements of section 172(c)(3) of the 

CAA. Finally, EPA finds adequate and 

is proposing to approve the State’s 2021 

MVEBs for the Allegan County area. 

VIII. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, redesignation of an 

area to attainment and the 

accompanying approval of a 

maintenance plan under section 

107(d)(3)(E) are actions that affect the 

status of a geographical area and do not 

impose any additional regulatory 

requirements on sources beyond those 

imposed by State law. A redesignation 

to attainment does not in and of itself 

create any new requirements, but rather 

results in the applicability of 

requirements contained in the CAA for 

areas that have been redesignated to 

attainment. Moreover, the Administrator 

is required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve State choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, these 

actions merely do not impose additional 

requirements beyond those imposed by 

State law and the Clean Air Act. For that 

reason, these actions: 

• Are not ‘‘significant regulatory 

actions’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Do not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Are certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Do not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Do not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Are not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Are not subject to requirements of 

section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• Do not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

Tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because 

redesignation is an action that affects 

the status of a geographical area and 

does not impose any new regulatory 

requirements on Tribes, impact any 

existing sources of air pollution on 

Tribal lands, nor impair the 

maintenance of ozone national ambient 

air quality standards in Tribal lands. 

However, because there are Tribal lands 

located in Allegan County, we provided 

the affected Tribe with the opportunity 

to consult with EPA on the 

redesignation. The affected Tribe raised 

no concerns with the proposed rule. 

List of Subjects 

40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Intergovernmental 

relations, Ozone, Nitrogen dioxides, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Volatile organic 

compounds. 

40 CFR Part 81 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: July 8, 2010. 

Susan Hedman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

[FR Doc. 2010–17680 Filed 7–19–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 63 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–0080; FRL–9176–6] 

RIN 2060–AQ26 

Amendments to National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air 

Pollutants: Area Source Standards for 

Prepared Feeds Manufacturing 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing three 

amendments to the regulatory text in the 

prepared feeds manufacturing area 

source rule. First, this action would 

correct the date for new sources to 

submit a Notification of Compliance 

Status (NOCS) form. Second, this action 

would correct information that needs to 

be included in the Notification of 

Compliance Report for those small 

facilities that are not required to install 

cyclones on their pelleting operations. 

Third, this action would add language 

to the regulatory text requiring submittal 

of the annual compliance certification 

report that was inadvertently left out of 

the final rule. These corrections and 

clarifications would not change the 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 138 / Tuesday, July 20, 2010 / Proposed Rules 42031 

standards established by the rule. These 

corrections and clarifications also 

would not result in the imposition of 

any costs beyond those included in the 

final rule. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received on or before September 3, 

2010. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 

OAR–2008–0080, by one of the 

following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Agency Web site: http:// 

www.epa.gov/oar/docket.html. Follow 

the instructions for submitting 

comments on the EPA Air and Radiation 

Docket Web site. 

• E-mail: a-and-r-Docket@epa.gov. 

Include Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR– 

2008–0080 in the subject line of the 

message. 

• Fax: Send comments to (202) 566– 

9744, Attention Docket ID No. EPA– 

HQ–OAR–2008–0080. 

• Mail: Area Source NESHAP for 

Prepared Feeds Manufacturing Docket, 

Environmental Protection Agency, Air 

and Radiation Docket and Information 

Center, Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20460. Please include a 

total of two copies. 

• Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center, 

Public Reading Room, EPA West, Room 

3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20460. Such deliveries 

are only accepted during the Docket’s 

normal hours of operation, and special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2008– 

0080. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be confidential business 

information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through http:// 

www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The 

http://www.regulations.gov Web site is 

an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an e-mail comment directly 

to EPA without going through http:// 

www.regulations.gov, your e-mail 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: EPA has established a docket 

for this action under Docket ID No. 

EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–0080. All 

documents in the docket are listed in 

the Federal Docket Management System 

index at http://www.regulations.gov. 

Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available 

(e.g., confidential business information 

(CBI) or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute). 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically through 

http://www.regulations.gov or in hard 

copy at the EPA Docket Center, Public 

Reading Room, EPA West, Room 3334, 

1301 Constitution Ave., NW., 

Washington, DC. The Public Reading 

Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 

p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding 

legal holidays. The telephone number 

for the Public Reading Room is (202) 

566–1744, and the telephone number for 

the Air Docket is (202) 566–1742. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jan 

King, Regulatory Development and 

Policy Analysis Group, Office of Air 

Quality Planning and Standards (C404– 

05), Environmental Protection Agency, 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711. 

Telephone number: (919) 541–5665; fax 

number: (919) 541–0242; e-mail address: 

king.jan@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

information presented in this preamble 

is organized as follows: 

I. Why is EPA issuing this proposed rule? 

II. Does this action apply to me? 

III. Where can I get a copy of this document? 

IV. What amendments are we making to the 

rule? 

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory 

Planning and Review 

B. Paperwork Reduction Act 

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act 

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism 

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation 

and Coordination with Indian Tribal 

Governments 

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of 

Children from Environmental Health and 

Safety Risks 

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use 

I. National Technology Transfer 

Advancement Act 

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions 

to Address Environmental Justice in 

Minority Populations and Low-Income 

Populations 

I. Why is EPA issuing this proposed 

rule? 

This document proposes to take 

action on three amendments to the 

regulatory text in the prepared feeds 

manufacturing area source rule. We 

have published a direct final rule 

amending the regulatory text in the 

prepared feeds manufacturing area 

source rule in the ‘‘Rules and 

Regulations’’ section of this Federal 

Register because we view this as a 

noncontroversial action and anticipate 

no adverse comment. We have 

explained our reasons for this action in 

the preamble to the direct final rule. 

If we receive no adverse comment by 

September 3, 2010, we will not take 

further action on this proposed rule. If 

we receive adverse comment, we will 

withdraw the amendments in the direct 

final rule or certain amendments in the 

direct final rule and those amendments 

will not take effect. We would address 

all public comments in any subsequent 

final rule based on this proposed rule. 

In the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section 

of this Federal Register, we are 

amending the regulatory text in the 

prepared feeds manufacturing area 

source rule as a direct final rule without 

a prior proposal. If we receive no 

adverse comment on that direct final 

rule, we will not take further action on 

this proposed rule. If we receive adverse 

comment, we will withdraw the 

amendments in the direct final rule or 

certain amendments in the direct final 

rule and those amendments will not 

take effect. The regulatory text for this 

proposal is identical to that for the 

direct final rule. 

We do not intend to institute a second 

comment period on this action. Any 

parties interested in commenting must 

do so at this time. For further 

information, please see the information 

proved in the ADDRESSES section of this 

document. 

II. Does this action apply to me? 

Regulated Entities. Categories and 

entities potentially regulated by the 

proposed rule include: 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
42032 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 138 / Tuesday, July 20, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

Category entities NAICS code 1 Examples of regulated entities 

Other Animal Foods Manufacturing ............................................ 311119 Animal feeds, prepared (except dog and cat), manufacturing. 

1 North American Industry Classification System. 

This table is not intended to be 

exhaustive, but rather provides a guide 

for readers regarding entities likely to be 

affected by this action. To determine 

whether your facility is regulated by this 

action, you should examine the 

applicability criteria in 40 CFR 

63.11619, subpart DDDDDDD (NESHAP 

for Area Sources: Prepared Feeds 

Manufacturing). If you have any 

questions regarding the applicability of 

this action to a particular entity, consult 

either the State delegated authority or 

the EPA regional representative, as 

listed in 40 CFR 63.13 of subpart A 

(General Provisions). 

III. Where can I get a copy of this 

document? 

Electronic Access. In addition to being 

available in the docket, an electronic 

copy of this proposed action will also be 

available on the Worldwide Web 

(WWW) through the Technology 

Transfer Network (TTN). Following 

signature, a copy of this final action will 

be posted on the TTN’s policy and 

guidance page for newly proposed or 

promulgated rules at the following 

address: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/. 

The TTN provides information and 

technology exchange in various areas of 

air pollution control. 

IV. What amendments are we making 

to this rule? 

On January 5, 2010 (75 FR 522), the 

EPA promulgated the national emission 

standards for hazardous air pollutants 

(NESHAP) for area source prepared 

feeds manufacturing facilities as subpart 

DDDDDDD in 40 CFR part 63. Today’s 

action proposes the following 

corrections and clarifications: 

1. The date for new sources to submit 

the Notification of Compliance Form is 

corrected from ‘‘within 120 days of 

startup, or by May 4, 2012, whichever 

is later,’’ to within 120 days of startup 

or October 18, 2010, whichever is later. 

2. Small facilities that are not subject 

to the requirement to install and operate 

a cyclone to control emissions from 

pelleting operations must submit 

documentation of their initial average 

daily feed production level in their 

Notification of Compliance Status 

report. The final rule used the incorrect 

term ‘‘initial daily pelleting production 

level.’’ This is being corrected to 

indicate that documentation of the 

‘‘initial average daily feed production 

level’’ be submitted. 

3. The requirement to submit the 

annual compliance certification report 

under certain circumstances is added. 

This requirement was in the proposed 

rule but inadvertently deleted in the 

final rule. 

These changes provide corrections 

and clarifications that are referenced in 

the final rule published on January 5, 

2010. Today’s action notifies interested 

parties of the proposed amendments. 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory 

Planning and Review 

This proposed action is not a 

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under the 

terms of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 

51735, October 4, 1993) and is, 

therefore, not subject to review under 

the Executive Order. 

B. Paperwork Reduction Act 

This action does not impose any new 

information collection burden. The 

proposed amendments result in no 

changes to the information collection 

requirements of the existing standards 

of performance and will have little or no 

impact on the information collection 

estimate of projected cost and hour 

burden made and approved by the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) during the development of the 

existing standards of performance. 

Therefore, the information collection 

requests have not been amended. 

However, OMB has previously approved 

the information collection requirements 

contained in the existing regulations 

(subpart DDDDDDD, 40 CFR part 63) 

under the provisions of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., 

and has assigned OMB control number 

2060–0635 (ICR 2354.02). The OMB 

control numbers for EPA’s regulations 

in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9. 

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act 

generally requires an agency to prepare 

a regulatory flexibility analysis of any 

rule subject to notice and comment 

rulemaking requirements under the 

Administrative Procedure Act or any 

other statute unless the agency certifies 

that the rule would not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

Small entities include small businesses, 

small not-for-profit enterprises, and 

small governmental jurisdictions. 

For the purposes of assessing the 

impacts of this rule on small entities, 

small entity is defined as: (1) A small 

business as defined by the Small 

Business Administration’s (SBA) 

regulations found at 13 CFR 121.201; (2) 

a small governmental jurisdiction that is 

a government of a city, county, town, 

school district, or special district with a 

population of less than 50,000; and (3) 

a small organization that is any not-forprofit enterprise which is independently 

owned and operated and is not 

dominant in its field. 

After considering the economic 

impacts of this proposed rule on small 

entities, I certify that this proposed 

action will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities. This action 

does not impose any additional costs 

over those in the final rule published on 

January 5, 2010 (75 FR 522). We 

continue to be interested in the 

potential impacts of this proposed 

amendment on small entities and 

welcome comments on issues related to 

such impacts. 

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

This proposed rule does not contain 

a Federal mandate that may result in 

expenditures of $100 million or more 

for State, local, and Tribal governments, 

in the aggregate, or to the private sector 

in any one year. This proposed rule is 

not expected to impact State, local, or 

Tribal governments. Thus, this rule 

would not be subject to the 

requirements of sections 202 and 205 of 

the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

(UMRA). 

This proposed rule would also not be 

subject to the requirements of section 

203 of UMRA because it contains no 

regulatory requirements that might 

significantly or uniquely affect small 

governments. 

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism 

This proposed rule does not have 

federalism implications. It will not have 

substantial direct effects on the States, 

on the relationship between the national 

government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government, as specified in 

Executive Order 13132. This proposed 

rule does not impose any requirements 

on State and local governments. Thus, 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 138 / Tuesday, July 20, 2010 / Proposed Rules 42033 

Executive Order 13132 does not apply 

to this proposed rule. 

In the spirit of Executive Order 13132, 

and consistent with EPA policy to 

promote communications between EPA 

and State and local governments, EPA 

specifically solicits comment on this 

proposed rule from State and local 

officials. 

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation 

and Coordination With Indian Tribal 

Governments 

This proposed action does not have 

Tribal implications, as specified in 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000). This proposed rule 

imposes no requirements on Tribal 

governments; thus, Executive Order 

13175 does not apply to this proposed 

action. EPA specifically solicits 

additional comment on this proposed 

action from Tribal officials. 

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of 

Children From Environmental Health 

and Safety Risks 

EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 

(62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) as 

applying to those regulatory actions that 

concern health or safety risks, such that 

the analysis required under section 5– 

501 of the Order has the potential to 

influence the regulation. This proposed 

action is not subject to Executive Order 

13045 because it is based solely on 

technology performance. 

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use 

This proposed rule is not a 

‘‘significant energy action’’ as defined in 

Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, 

May 22, 2001) because it is not likely to 

have a significant adverse effect on the 

supply, distribution, or use of energy. 

I. National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (‘‘NTTAA’’), Public Law 

104–113 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs 

EPA to use voluntary consensus 

standards in its regulatory activities, 

unless to do so would be inconsistent 

with applicable law or otherwise 

impractical. Voluntary consensus 

standards are technical standards (e.g., 

materials specifications, test methods, 

sampling procedures, and business 

practices) that are developed or adopted 

by voluntary consensus standards 

bodies. NTTAA directs EPA to provide 

Congress, through OMB, explanations 

when the Agency decides not to use 

available and applicable voluntary 

consensus standards. 

These proposed rule amendments do 

not involve technical standards as 

defined in the NTTAA. Therefore, this 

proposed rule is not subject to NTTAA. 

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal 

Actions To Address Environmental 

Justice in Minority Populations and 

Low-Income Populations 

Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, 

February 16, 1994) establishes Federal 

executive policy on environmental 

justice. Its main provision directs 

Federal agencies, to the greatest extent 

practicable and permitted by law, to 

make environmental justice part of their 

mission by identifying and addressing, 

as appropriate, disproportionately high 

and adverse human health or 

environmental effects of their programs, 

policies, and activities on minority 

populations and low-income 

populations in the United States. 

EPA has determined that this 

proposed rule would not have 

disproportionately high and adverse 

human health or environmental effects 

on minority or low-income populations 

because it increases the level of 

environmental protection for all affected 

populations without having any 

disproportionately high and adverse 

human health or environmental effects 

on any population, including any 

minority or low-income population. 

List of Subjects for 40 CFR Part 63 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Air pollution control, Hazardous 

substances, Intergovernmental relations, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: July 14, 2010. 

Lisa P. Jackson, 

Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 2010–17710 Filed 7–19–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Fish and Wildlife Service 

50 CFR Part 17 

[Docket No. FWS–R6–ES–2010–0047] 

[MO 92210–0–0008] 

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife 

and Plants; 90–Day Finding on a 

Petition to List Pinus albicaulis 

(Whitebark Pine) as Endangered or 

Threatened with Critical Habitat 

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of petition finding and 

initiation of status review. 

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service, announce a 90-day 

finding on a petition to list Pinus 

albicaulis (whitebark pine) as 

endangered or threatened under the 

Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 

amended and to designate critical 

habitat. Based on our review, we find 

that the petition presents substantial 

scientific or commercial information 

indicating that listing P. albicaulis may 

be warranted. Therefore, with the 

publication of this notice, we are 

initiating a review of the status of the 

species to determine if listing P. 

albicaulis is warranted. To ensure that 

this status review is comprehensive, we 

are requesting scientific and commercial 

data and other information regarding 

this species. Based on the status review, 

we will issue a 12–month finding on the 

petition, which will address whether 

the petitioned action is warranted, as 

provided in section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act. 

DATES: To allow us adequate time to 

conduct this review, we request that we 

receive information on or before 

September 20, 2010. Please note that if 

you are using the Federal eRulemaking 

Portal (see ADDRESSES section, below), 

the deadline for submitting an 

electronic comment is 11:59 p.m. 

Eastern Standard Time on this date. 

After September 20, 2010, you must 

submit information directly to the Field 

Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section below). Please note that 

we may not be able to address or 

incorporate information that we receive 

after the above requested date. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit 

information by one of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. In the box that 

reads ‘‘Enter Keyword or ID,’’ enter the 

docket number for this finding, which is 

FWS–R6–ES–2010–0047. Check the box 

that reads ‘‘Open for Comment/ 

Submission,’’ and then click the Search 

button. You should then see an icon that 

reads ‘‘Submit a Comment.’’ Please 

ensure that you have found the correct 

rulemaking before submitting your 

comment. 

• U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public 

Comments Processing, Attn: FWS–R6– 

ES–2010–0047; Division of Policy and 

Directives Management; U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, 

Suite 222; Arlington, VA 22203. 

We will post all information received 

on http://www.regulations.gov. This 

generally means that we will post any 

personal information you provide us 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1