alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
April 1, 2015

The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx

Secretary of Transportation

US Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave SE

Washington, DC 20590

The Honorable John F. Kerry

Secretary of State

US Department of State

2201 C Street NW

Washington, DC 20520

Dear Secretaries Foxx and Kerry, 

News reports that the nations of Qatar and the United Arab Emirates have been subsidizing of 

their three state-owned airlines—Qatar Airways, Etihad Airways and Emirates Airline—thereby 

undermining fair competition in the marketplace and threatening U.S. jobs are extremely 

concerning. 

According to a recent white paper, Restoring Open Skies: The Need to Address Subsidized 

Competition from State-Owned Airlines in Qatar and the UAE, released by the Partnership for 

Open & Fair Skies, Qatar, Etihad and Emirates have received $42 billion in subsidies and other 

unfair benefits from their respective governments over the past ten years. The Gulf carriers’ 

influx of funds has enabled them to divert passengers from the U.S. airlines, which has hindered 

U.S. carriers from introducing new routes and is threatening to push them off of existing ones, 

stifling job creation. In fact, every international roundtrip flight that is lost by a U.S. carrier 

results in an average net loss of 821 U.S. jobs. 

As Executive Director of New York Communities for Change (NYCC), I am very concerned by 

this unfair competition. New York is a major international hub and many in our community rely 

on a healthy airline industry to support their livelihood. Today, the U.S. airline industry supports 

11 million U.S. jobs, and American Airlines alone employs approximately 8,060 people in the 

New York area. If the anti-competitive practices of the Gulf carriers are not addressed, the pilots, 

flight attendants, maintenance workers, baggage crews, ticketing agents, and other airline 

employees in our community will suffer the most. 

NYCC represents more than 45,000 families in the City of New York and on Long Island, and 
on their behalf, I ask you to please review the report above and consider opening up a dialogue 

on the Open Skies agreements to ensure that airline competition is fair and that U.S. jobs are 

protected.

Sincerely, 

Jonathan Westin 

cc:

Senator Chuck Schumer

Senator Kirstin Gillibrand

Rep. Joseph Crowley

Rep. Gregory Meeks

Rep. Grace Meng

Rep. Jerrold Nadler

Rep. Jose Serrano

Mayor Bill de Blasio
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Vega, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 895]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Phylis Skloot Bamberger, J., at suppression hearing; Efrain Alvarado, J., at plea and sentence), rendered December 1, 2003, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of six years to life, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the DNA databank fee, and otherwise affirmed.

The record establishes that defendant made an effective waiver of his right to appeal *(see People v Lopez,*6 NY3d 248, 256-257 [2006]). The plea court thoroughly advised defendant that under the terms of his plea bargain he was giving up his right to appellate review of the denial of his suppression motion, and the court did not conflate that right with the rights automatically forfeited by a guilty plea. This waiver forecloses *362review of the suppression issue, and includes waiver of the right to invoke this Court’s interest of justice jurisdiction.

As the People concede, since the crime was committed prior to the effective date of the legislation (Penal Law § 60.35 [1] [a] [v] [former (1) (e)]), providing for the imposition of a DNA databank fee, that fee should not have been imposed. Concur— Buckley, EJ., Saxe, Williams, Sweeny and Malone, JJ.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                           DRAFT
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12




GTE HAWAIIAN TELEPHONE COMPANY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

Statements of the Consolidated Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                              Years Ended December 31,
                                             --------------------------------------------------------
                                               1998        1997        1996        1995       1994
                                             --------------------------------------------------------
                                                          (Dollars in Millions)
<S>                                          <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>    
Net earnings available for fixed charges:
  Income (loss) before extraordinary 
  charges                                    $  72.9     $  61.0     $  54.7     $  37.9     $  29.8
  Add - Income taxes                            36.2        42.3        23.9        15.0        12.6
      - Fixed charges                           49.0        46.0        45.6        46.1        41.3
                                             -------     -------     -------     -------     -------

Adjusted earnings                            $ 158.1     $ 149.3     $ 124.2     $  99.0     $  83.7
                                             =======     =======     =======     =======     =======
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                           $  44.7     $  41.2     $  40.9     $  41.8     $  36.1
  Portion of rent expense
      representing interest                      4.3         4.8         4.7         4.3         5.2
                                             -------     -------     -------     -------     -------

Adjusted fixed charges                       $  49.0     $  46.0     $  45.6     $  46.1     $  41.3
                                             =======     =======     =======     =======     =======
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED
  CHARGES                                       3.23        3.25        2.72        2.15        2.03
</TABLE>
# Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA

- 2015

- 8427

Directorate Identifier: 2014NM212AD

A300

- 600 FUEL AIRWORTHINESS LIMITATIONS

DOCUMENT 95A.1929/05

--- ISSUE 02, 5/16/2007

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the

Supplemental AD Docket



### MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
### §460hhh–2. Establishment

#### (a) In general

Subject to valid existing rights, there is established the Spring Mountains National Recreation Area in Nevada.

#### (b) Boundaries and map

The Recreation Area shall consist of approximately 316,000 acres of federally owned lands and interests therein in the Toiyabe National Forest, as generally depicted on a map entitled "Spring Mountain National Recreation Area—Proposed", numbered NV–CH, and dated August 2, 1992.

#### (c) Map filing

As soon as practicable after August 4, 1993, the Secretary shall file a map of the Recreation Area with the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives.

#### (d) Public inspection

The map shall be on file and available for public inspection in the offices of the Chief of the Forest Service, Department of Agriculture.

#### (e) Discrepancies

In the case of any discrepancy between or among the acreage referred to in subsection (b) and the map described in subsection (b), the map described in subsection (b) shall control any question concerning the boundaries of the Recreation Area.

(Pub. L. 103–63, §4, Aug. 4, 1993, 107 Stat. 297.)
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Ramon Quiroga, * From the 244th District Court

 of Ector County, Texas

Trial Court No. C-40,472.

Vs. No. 11-16-00229-CR * September 8, 2016

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the 

appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance with 

this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED  JUNE 30, 2000 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                        10,207,204
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   1,196,821
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                     253,222
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             11,894,601
<PP&E>                                          723,840
<DEPRECIATION>                                   64,656
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               20,221,727
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         2,505,733
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                     17,287,404
<OTHER-SE>                                   (4,195,130)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 20,221,727
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              1,979,919
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 1,282,051
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              1,637,067
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (939,199)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     12,192
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1,540,698)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.03)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Stonewall  Financial,  Ltd.,
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"),  the undersigned,  B.
Stephen Bailey,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge  and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
**SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**
     In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Surgical Partners International, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I, William H. Wilcox, President and Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ William H. Wilcox William H. Wilcox
Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

MANDATE

TO THE COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 2 OF DALLAS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas, on the 16th day of September, 2015, 

the cause on appeal to revise or reverse the judgment between

HECTOR JESUS CLAUDIO, Appellant

No. 05-15-00816-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court 

No. 2, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MB14-04542-B.

Opinion delivered by Justice Stoddart, Chief 

Justice Wright and Justice Fillmore 

participating.

was determined; and this Court made its order in these words:

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we AFFIRM the trial court’s judgment.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of the Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth District of Texas, in this behalf, and have it duly obeyed and executed.

WITNESS the HON. CAROLYN WRIGHT, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals, with 

the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Dallas, this 16th day of September, 2015.

LISA MATZ, Clerk
0 0.050.1 0.2 F 0.4 (PI Atizona Hedgehog Habitat
Miles

Tonto National Forest
f | | Supervisor's Office gs Legend
2
‘ FR, SFebo0I0 [J Treatment site
~ |

a
§ 603.1 Jurisdiction of the Independent Counsel ( a ) The Independent Counsel: In re Madison Guaranty Savings & Loan Association shall have jurisdiction and authority to investigate to the maximum extent authorized by part 600 of this chapter whether any individuals or entities have committed a violation of any federal criminal or civil law relating in any way to President William Jefferson Clinton's or Mrs. Hillary Rodham Clinton's relationships with: ( 1 ) Madison Guaranty Savings & Loan Association;
( 2 ) Whitewater Development Corporation; or
( 3 ) Capital Management Services.
( b ) The Independent Counsel: In re Madison Guaranty Savings & Loan Association shall have jurisdiction and authority to investigate other allegations or evidence of violation of any federal criminal or civil law by any person or entity developed during the Independent Counsel's investigation referred to above, and connected with or arising out of that investigation.
( c ) The Independent Counsel: In re Madison Guaranty Savings & Loan Association shall have jurisdiction and authority to investigate any violation of section 1826 of title 28 of the U.S. Code, or any obstruction of the due administration of justice, or any material false testimony or statement in violation of federal law, in connection with any investigation of the matters described in paragraph (a) or (b) of this section.
( d ) The Independent Counsel: In re Madison Guaranty Savings & Loan Association shall have jurisdiction and authority to seek indictments and to prosecute, or to bring civil actions against, any persons or entities involved in any of the matters referred to in paragraph (a), (b), or (c) of this section who are reasonably believed to have committed a violation of any federal criminal or civil law arising out of such matters, including persons or entities who have engaged in an unlawful conspiracy or who have aided or abetted any federal offense.
[59 FR 5322, Feb. 4, 1994]
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 396 

Designating October 2019 as ‘‘National Health Literacy Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 31, 2019 

Mr. MURPHY (for himself, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, and Mr. 

SCOTT of South Carolina) submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

NOVEMBER 6, 2019 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating October 2019 as ‘‘National Health Literacy 

Month’’. 

Whereas health literacy is the degree to which individuals can 

obtain and understand basic health information in order 

to make informed health decisions; 

Whereas, according to the latest national assessment of 

health literacy, a majority of adults have intermediate 

health literacy, while more than 75,000,000 adults have 

basic or below basic health literacy; 

Whereas language and cultural differences can affect health 

literacy and thereby lower effective health communication 

between providers and patients; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

SRES 396 ATS 

Whereas, according to the Agency for Healthcare Research 

and Quality, low health literacy is associated with higher 

rates of emergency care use, increased hospitalizations, 

and, among seniors, higher mortality; 

Whereas the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 

also found that low health literacy can be associated with 

a lack of medication adherence; 

Whereas experts estimate that the annual cost of low health 

literacy to the United States economy is between 

$106,000,000,000 and $238,000,000,000; 

Whereas mental health literacy may lead to better outcomes 

for individuals with mental disorders, particularly individuals with suicidal ideation, either by facilitating early 

help-seeking by those individuals or helping others identify early signs of mental disorders and seek help on behalf of those individuals; 

Whereas health literacy can assist in preventing disease and 

illness, increasing life expectancy, improving patient care 

and outcomes, and reducing health care costs; 

Whereas, in 2010, the Department of Health and Human 

Services issued a National Action Plan to Improve 

Health Literacy that establishes 7 goals; and 

Whereas advocacy organizations have recognized the month 

of October as ‘‘National Health Literacy Month’’ to increase awareness about the importance of making health 

information easy to understand: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates October 2019 as ‘‘National 

3 Health Literacy Month’’; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

SRES 396 ATS 

1 (2) encourages individuals to assess and im2 prove their health knowledge and literacy; 

3 (3) recommends that health care providers de4 liver health services in a clear and comprehensive 

5 manner; and 

6 (4) encourages all interested parties to promote 

7 the importance of health literacy. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<PAGE> 78

EXHIBIT 21.1
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
The following table sets forth certain information concerning the 
principal subsidiaries of the Company as of December 31, 1995.

                                                  State or other 
                                                  jurisdiction of
Name                                              incorporation

Circle International, Inc.                          Delaware

Circle Airfreight Japan, Ltd.                       California

Circle Air Freight de Mexico C.V.                   Mexico

Circle Espana S.A.                                  Spain

Circle Freight International
  Speditionsgesellschaft GmbH                       Germany

Circle Fretes Internacionais Do
  Brasil Ltda.                                      Brazil

Circle Freight International (Argentina) S.A.       Argentina

Circle Freight International
(Canada) Ltd.                                       Canada

Circle Freight International (Holland) B.V.         Holland 

Circle Freight International (India) Pty. Ltd.      India

Circle Freight International (Italia) SRL           Italy

Circle Freight International Japan                  Japan

Circle Freight International Korea                  Korea

Circle Freight International (NZ) Ltd.              New Zealand

Circle Freight International
Philippines Ltd., Inc.                              Philippines

<PAGE> 79
                                                  State or other 
                                                  jurisdiction of
Name                                              incorporation

Circle Freight International
(Singapore) Pte., Ltd.                              Singapore

Circle International
(Aust.) Pty., Ltd.                                  Australia

Circle International (Hong Kong) Ltd.               Hong Kong

Circle International Limited                        United Kingdom

Circle International (Sweden) AB                    Sweden

Darrell J. Sekin & Co.                              Texas

Harper Logistics International                      France

J.R. Michels Incorporated                           Texas

Max Gruenhut B.V.                                   Holland

Max Gruenhut GmbH                                   Germany

Regga Holdings Limited                              Bermuda

Regga Insurance Limited                             Bermuda

The names of certain subsidiaries have been omitted because such 
unnamed subsidiaries, considered in the aggregate, would not 
constitute a significant subsidiary as that term is defined in 
Regulation S-X.
§ 90.14 Judicial notification requirement. ( a ) To be eligible for funding under this program, a State must meet the requirements of 42 U.S.C. 3796gg-4(e) with regard to judicial notification to domestic violence offenders of Federal prohibitions on their possession of a firearm or ammunition in 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(8) and (9) and any applicable related Federal, State, or local laws..
( b ) A unit of local government shall not be eligible for subgrants from the State unless it complies with the requirements of 42 U.S.C. 3796gg-4(e) with respect to its judicial administrative policies and practices.
Reba neza ko gapfutse amazuru n’umunwa kugira ngo ufashe kurinda abandi. 

Ushobora kuba waranduye ariko ntugaragaze ibimenyetso.

Imenyereze gusiga intera hagati 

yawe n’abandi

Siga intera ya metero 2 hagati yawe n’abandi bantu.

Kandi ujye wambara agapfukamunwa

Fasha kwirinda no kurinda abandi COVID-19

CS 317297-K 29/05/2020
### §470v–2. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section 470v–2, Pub. L. 89–665, title II, §216, as added Pub. L. 109–453, §1(g), Dec. 22, 2006, 120 Stat. 3368, related to effectiveness of Federal grant and assistance programs. See section 304112 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
###### Editorial Note on Part 635

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 635 appear at 67 FR 75924, Dec. 10, 2002.

#### § 635.401 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to prescribe requirements and procedures relating to product and material selection and use on Federal-aid highway projects.
### §5206. Rule of construction

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to impair a right guaranteed to a person under the first article of amendment to the Constitution or limit any legal remedy for forceful interference with a person's lawful participation in speech or peaceful assembly.

(Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXII, §320807, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2122.)
#### § 701.19 Other rights and services.

Nothing in this part shall be construed to entitle any person, as of right, to any service or to the disclosure of any record to which such person is not entitled under 5 U.S.C. 552.