alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134708 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134708 COA: 278504 Wayne CC: 97-000790 FREDERICK L. TERRY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the A ugust 1, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

t1119 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2007

Clerk
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6062** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. EUGENE LAMONT FRIEND , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. ( 3:99

- cr - 00201

- REP

- 1; 3:13

- cv - 00686

- REP )

Submitted : June 16, 2014 Decided: June 26, 2014

Before KING and KEENAN , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Eugene Lamont Friend, Appellant Pro Se. Brian R. Hood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Eugene Lamont Friend seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his pleading as an unauthorized, successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfie s this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003 ). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Friend has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 con tentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §471a. Forest reserves in New Mexico and Arizona restricted

No forest reservation shall be created, nor shall any additions be made to one created prior to June 15, 1926, within the limits of the States of New Mexico and Arizona except by Act of Congress.

(June 15, 1926, ch. 587, 44 Stat. 745.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Forest reservation, referred to in text, probably should be "national forest". See act Mar. 4, 1907, ch. 2907, 34 Stat. 1269, which provided that forest reserves shall hereafter be known as national forests.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 929 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 929

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend title 28, United States Code, to redefine the eastern and 
              middle judicial districts of North Carolina.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JUDICIAL DISTRICTS OF NORTH CAROLINA.

    (a) In General.--Section 113 of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``and Wilson and'' and 
        inserting ``Wilson, those portions of Hoke, Moore, Scotland, 
        and Richmond counties encompassing the Fort Bragg Military 
        Reservation and Camp Mackall, and''; and
            (2) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:
    ``(b) Middle District.--The Middle District comprises the counties 
of Alamance, Cabarrus, Caswell, Chatham, Davidson, Davie, Durham 
(excluding that portion of Durham County encompassing the Federal 
Correctional Institution, Butner, North Carolina), Forsyth, Guilford, 
Hoke (excluding that portion of Hoke County encompassing the Fort Bragg 
Military Reservation and Camp Mackall), Lee, Montgomery, Moore 
(excluding that portion of Moore County encompassing the Fort Bragg 
Military Reservation and Camp Mackall), Orange, Person, Randolph, 
Richmond (excluding that portion of Richmond County encompassing the 
Fort Bragg Military Reservation and Camp Mackall), Rockingham, Rowan, 
Scotland (excluding that portion of Scotland County encompassing the 
Fort Bragg Military Reservation and Camp Mackall), Stanly, Stokes, 
Surry, and Yadkin.''.
    (b) Application.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall not 
apply to any action commenced or pending in any judicial district of 
North Carolina before the date of enactment of this Act.

            Passed the Senate July 30, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 929

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend title 28, United States Code, to redefine the eastern and 
              middle judicial districts of North Carolina.
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Funding Programs 

# Funding Programs

Find funding to start or grow your business, or to help you recover after a declared disaster.

## Funding Programs

-  Loans              Start or expand your business with loans guaranteed by the Small Business Administration.                  Learn more about loans 
-  Investment capital              Find an investor for your business. Investors make both debt and equity investments.                  Learn more about investment capital 
-  Disaster assistance              Get help after a disaster with low-interest disaster loans from the Small Business Administration.                  Learn more about disaster assistance 
-  Surety bonds              Protect your work and your client with an SBA-guaranteed surety bond.                  Learn more about surety bonds 
-  Grants              Look for government grants that help businesses do scientific research and development.                  Learn more about grants
EXHIBIT 31.2



SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



I, Stephen J. Schoepfer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 3 to the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2012 of Carbonics Capital Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting,
or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles;



(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d) Disclosed in the report any change in the registrant’s
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.



4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors
and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.



Date: July 11, 2012

| |  |                          |  | 
| |  | ------------------------ |  | 
| |  |                         
| |  | /s/ Stephen J. Schoepfer
| |  | Stephen J. Schoepfer    
| |  |
----

Action brought on 13 October 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-419/06)

(2006/C 310/14)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Konstantinidis and E. Righini)

Defendant: Hellenic Republic

Form of order sought

The Court is asked to:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission decision requires Greece to recover the aid referred to in Article 1 from the recipients and to suspend without delay each payment of aid to Olympic Airways and Olympic Airlines. Greece was also required to inform the Commission, within two months of the date of the decision, of the measures it took to comply.

The above period allowed for compliance expired on 15 November 2005.

According to settled case law, the only justification that can be put forward by a Member State in the context of the Article 88(2) EC procedure is the absolute impossibility of proper implementation of the decision. The Commission would, moreover, point out that, in accordance with the above case-law, the Greek authorities could not rely on absolute impossibility without having attempted to recover the amount, and no such attempt has been made.

The Greek authorities have not relied on extraordinary or unforeseeable difficulties rendering implementation of the decision impossible. Nor have they proposed alternative means of applying the decision which would enable the difficulties to be overcome. The Greek authorities have confined themselves to challenging the validity of the decision and of the quantitative calculation of the aid by the Commission, a fact which shows that they have not applied the slightest measure to suspend or recover the aid.

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

        Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EarthLink, Inc.(the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, RollaP. Huff, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:

 

(1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  ROLLA P.  HUFF |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
|                          |   |
| Rolla P. Huff                 |   |
| Chief Executive Officer       |   |
| May 2,  2008             |   |

 

----
##### 



Hercules Incorporated EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Hercules Incorporated (the
Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Allen A. Spizzo, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date: November 22, 2004 /s/
Allen A. SpizzoAllen A. Spizzo
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 90
X

X

X

X

Centers for Disease Control

and Prevention

National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health

Find NIOSH products and get answers to workplace safety and health questions:

1-800-CDC-INFO (1-800-232-4636) | TTY: 1-888-232-6348

CDC/NIOSH INFO: cdc.gov/info | cdc.gov/niosh

Monthly NIOSH eNews: cdc.gov/niosh/eNews

DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2020–112

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26616/NIOSHPUB2020112

Disclaimer: Mention of any company or product does not constitute endorsement by NIOSH.

Use Available Noise Controls

• Remain inside cabs or other 

enclosures with the windows and 

doors closed

• Replace noise controls (e.g., curtains, 

seals) after equipment maintenance 

or inspection as needed

Move Away from Loud Areas

• Avoid circumstances where 

communication is affected by noise

• Take scheduled breaks and lunch 

breaks in quiet areas

Maintain Equipment

• Ensure correct machine lubrication, 

belt and bolt tension, and motor 

performance

• Replace broken, worn out, and 

misused parts that contribute to 

equipment noise

Use Hearing Protection

• Use hearing protection consistently 

when working in noise

• Ensure protection is correctly worn 

with other safety equipment and is 

comfortable for extended wear

NOW HEAR THIS!

Take action to protect your hearing

Accessible Version: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining/content/nowhearthis.html
Exhibit 32.2





CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Gyrodyne Company of America, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Gary Fitlin, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.







Date: March 30, 2011
By:
/s/ Gary FitlinGary Fitlin,Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4301 — Alliance Boots/Cardinal Health)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 6/09)

On 22 September 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
### §544a. Purposes

The purposes of sections 544 to 544p of this title are—

(1) to establish a national scenic area to protect and provide for the enhancement of the scenic, cultural, recreational, and natural resources of the Columbia River Gorge; and

(2) to protect and support the economy of the Columbia River Gorge area by encouraging growth to occur in existing urban areas and by allowing future economic development in a manner that is consistent with paragraph (1).

(Pub. L. 99–663, §3, Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4276.)
### §§403c–5 to 403c–11. Repealed. June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §39, 62 Stat. 992, eff. Sept. 1, 1948

Section 403c–5, acts Aug. 19, 1937, ch. 703, §5, 50 Stat. 702; May 15, 1947, ch. 57, 61 Stat. 92, related to appointment and jurisdiction of commissioner. See provisions covering United States magistrate judges in section 631 et seq. of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

Section 403c–6, act Aug. 19, 1937, ch. 703, §6, 50 Stat. 702, related to jurisdiction of other commissioners. See provisions covering United States magistrate judges in section 631 et seq. of Title 28.

Section 403c–7, act Aug. 19, 1937, ch. 703, §7, 50 Stat. 702, related to issuance of process. See sections 3041 and 3141 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and rules 4, 5(c), and 9 of Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Title 18, Appendix.

Section 403c–8, act Aug. 19, 1937, ch. 703, §8, 50 Stat. 702, related to whom process is directed. See section 3053 of Title 18, rule 4 of Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Title 18, Appendix, and rule 4 of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Title 28, Appendix, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

Section 403c–9, act Aug. 19, 1937, ch. 703, §9, 50 Stat. 702, related to commissioner's [now magistrate judge's] salary.

Section 403c–10, act Aug. 19, 1937, ch. 703, §10, 50 Stat. 703, related to fees, costs, and expenses against United States. See section 604 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

Section 403c–11, act Aug. 19, 1937, ch. 703, §11, 50 Stat. 703, related to disposition of fines and costs. See section 634 of Title 28.
<PAGE>   1

















                                  EXHIBIT 15

           Letter regarding Unaudited Interim Financial Information
<PAGE>   2
C.H. Heist Corp.
Clearwater, Florida



With respect to the registration statement No. 33-48497, we acknowledge our
awareness of the incorporation of our reports dated April 26, 1996, July 26,
1996 and October 29, 1996 related to our reviews of interim financial
information.

Pursuant to rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such
reports are not considered part of a registration statement prepared or
certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant
within the meaning of sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


                                        Very truly yours,


                                        KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Buffalo, New York
March 24, 1997
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Regency Equities Corp. (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Allan L. Chapman, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

/s/ ALLAN L. CHAPMAN
Allan L. Chapman
Chief Executive Officer
April 26, 2004
Appendix C3

1
Appendix C3

2
Appendix C3

3
Appendix C3

4
Appendix C3

5
Appendix C3

6
Appendix C3

7
#### § 230.309 Program format.

It is essential that a standardized Federal approach be taken in assisting the States in development and implementation of EEO programs. The format set forth in appendix A provides that standardized approach. State equal employment opportunity programs that meet or exceed the prescribed standards will comply with basic FHWA requirements.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Each of the undersigned officers of American Realty
Investors, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company) hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



| | (i) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2011, fairly presents in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, at and for the periods indicated.
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                                                                                   
|------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  | 
|Dated: May 16, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ Daniel J. Moos                                                                
|                    |  |  |  | Daniel J. Moos                                                                    
|                    |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)               
|                    |  | 
|Dated: May 16, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ Gene S. Bertcher                                                              
|                    |  |  |  | Gene S. Bertcher                                                                  
|                    |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)