alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 174/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 174 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6528 April 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 174

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6528 April 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions |
| | RECOMMENDATIONS |
| | European Systemic Risk Board |
| 2022/C 174/01 | Recommendation of the European Systemic Risk Board of 16 February 2022 amending Recommendation ESRB/2015/2 on the assessment of cross-border effects of and voluntary reciprocity for macroprudential policy measures (ESRB/2022/1) | 1 |

Contents

page

I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions

RECOMMENDATIONS

European Systemic Risk Board

2022/C 174/01

Recommendation of the European Systemic Risk Board of 16 February 2022 amending Recommendation ESRB/2015/2 on the assessment of cross-border effects of and voluntary reciprocity for macroprudential policy measures (ESRB/2022/1)

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 174/02 | Euro exchange rates — 27 April 2022 | 16 |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2022/C 174/03 | Special report No 6/2022 – EU intellectual property rights – protection not fully waterproof | 17 |
| | NOTICES CONCERNING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA |
| | EFTA Surveillance Authority |
| 2022/C 174/04 | EFTA Surveillance Authority’s notice on state aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for the EFTA States applicable as from 1 February 2022
  (Published in accordance with the rules on reference and discount rates set out in Part VII of ESA’s State Aid Guidelines and Article 10 of ESA’s Decision No 195/04/COL 14 July 2004) | 18 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 174/02

Euro exchange rates — 27 April 2022

16

Court of Auditors

2022/C 174/03

Special report No 6/2022 – EU intellectual property rights – protection not fully waterproof

17

NOTICES CONCERNING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA

EFTA Surveillance Authority

2022/C 174/04

EFTA Surveillance Authority’s notice on state aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for the EFTA States applicable as from 1 February 2022
  (Published in accordance with the rules on reference and discount rates set out in Part VII of ESA’s State Aid Guidelines and Article 10 of ESA’s Decision No 195/04/COL 14 July 2004)

(Published in accordance with the rules on reference and discount rates set out in Part VII of ESA’s State Aid Guidelines and Article 10 of ESA’s Decision No 195/04/COL 14 July 2004

18

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 177 (Thursday, September 12, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 56267]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-22207]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8465; No. 2013-5]

Determination Pursuant To the Foreign Missions Act

    Pursuant to the authority vested in me under the Foreign Missions 
Act, 22 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), and Department of State 
Delegation of Authority No. 198 of September 16, 1992, I hereby 
determine that the plans submitted by the Embassy of the Republic of 
South Africa to the Public Space Committee of the District of 
Columbia's Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs concerning the 
location of a flagpole in public space at its chancery located at 3051 
Massachusetts Avenue NW, demonstrate substantial compliance with 
District of Columbia building and related codes in a manner determined 
by the Secretary not to be inconsistent with the international 
obligations of the United States, in accordance with section 206(g) of 
the Act.

    Dated: August 20, 2013.
Patrick F. Kennedy,
Under Secretary for Management.
[FR Doc. 2013-22207 Filed 9-11-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-43-P
```
Cullen D. Speckhart (VSB No. 79096) 

Diana Lyn Curtis McGraw (VSB No. 89392) 

WOLCOTT RIVERS GATES 

919 E. Main Street, Ste. 1040, Richmond, Virginia 23219 

200 Bendix Road, Ste. 300, Virginia Beach, Virginia 23452 

Telephone: (757) 687-3644 

Email: hdl@wolriv.com 

Counsel to Plaintiff Richard Arrowsmith,

Liquidating Trustee of the HDL Liquidating Trust

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

Richmond Division 

In re: Chapter 11 

 

HEALTH DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY, INC., 

et al., 

 Case No.: 15-32919-KRH 

 Debtors.1

 Jointly Administered 

 

RICHARD ARROWSMITH AS LIQUIDATING 

TRUSTEE OF THE HDL LIQUIDATING 

TRUST, 

 

 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

 Adv. Proc. No. 17-04329-KRH 

GOLDIS GERIATRICS, P.C., et al., 

Defendants. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I, Diana Lyn Curtis McGraw, certify that I am, and at all times during the service of process was, not 

less than 18 years of age and not a party to the matter concerning which service of process was made. 

I further certify that service of the copies of the Complaint [Docket Item No. 1] together with the Order 

Approving Amended Procedures Governing Avoidance Action Adversary Proceedings and Summons 

and Notice in an Adversary Proceeding [Docket Item No. 3] were served on July 21, 2017, as follows: 

Mail Service: Regular, first class United States mail, postage fully pre-paid and addressed to: 

MICHAEL E. GOLDIS 

REG. AGENT AND PRESIDENT 

36 STOKES ROAD 

MT. LAUREL, NJ 08054 

 

 

1

 The debtors in these cases, along with the last four digits of each debtor’s federal tax identification number, are: 

Health Diagnostic Laboratory, Inc. (0119), Central Medical Laboratory, LLC (2728), and Integrated Health 

Leaders, LLC (2434)(the “Debtors”). 

Case 17-04329-KRH Doc 4 Filed 07/21/17 Entered 07/21/17 14:42:30 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
MICHAEL GOLDIS 

119 E. LAUREL ROAD 

STRATFORD, NJ 08084 

 

Under penalty of perjury, I declare that the foregoing is true and correct. 

 July 21, 2017 /s/ Diana Lyn Curtis McGraw 

 Date Signature 

Print Name: 

Diana Lyn Curtis McGraw 

Business Address: 

200 Bendix Road, Suite 300, Virginia Beach, VA 23452 

Case 17-04329-KRH Doc 4 Filed 07/21/17 Entered 07/21/17 14:42:30 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3
Case 17-04329-KRH Doc 4 Filed 07/21/17 Entered 07/21/17 14:42:30 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

August 24, 2021

In the Matter of

Empire Post Media,

File No. 500-1

ORDER OF SUSPENSION OF

TRADING

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Empire Post Media

(“EMPM1”) (CIK No. 1478682), an active Nevada corporation located in Las Vegas, Nevada

with a class of securities registered with the Commission pursuant to Securities Exchange Act of 

1934 ("Exchange Act") Section 12(g) because it is delinquent in its periodic filings with the 

Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-Q for the period 

ended August 31, 2019. On July 8, 2021, the Commission’s Division of Corporation Finance 

(“Corporation Finance”) sent a delinquency letter to EMPM requesting compliance with its 

periodic filing requirements, but EMPM did not receive the delinquency letter due to its failure 

to maintain a valid address on file with the Commission as required by Commission rules (Rule 

301 of Regulation S-T, 17 C.F.R. Section 232.301 and Section 5.4 of EDGAR Filer Manual). As 

of July 28, 2021, the common stock of EMPM was quoted on OTC Link operated by OTC 

Markets Group Inc. (formerly “Pink Sheets”) (“OTC Link”), had five market makers, and was

eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11(f)(3). 

 

1 The short form of each issuer’s name is also its stock symbol.
2

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors 

require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company. Therefore, it is 

ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the 

securities of the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on 

August 25, 2021, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on September 8, 2021.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report of GoAmerica, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, John Ferron, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods presented. 

Dated: August 14, 2008 

 

 

 

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 35 (Thursday, February 21, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 12042]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-03896]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD

Public Availability of Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board FY 
2011 Service Contract Inventory Analysis/FY 2012 Service Contract 
Inventory

AGENCY: Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB).

ACTION: Notice of Public Availability of FY 2011 Service Contract 
Inventory Analysis and FY 2012 Service Contract Inventory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 743 of Division C of the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-117), DNFSB is 
publishing this notice to advise the public of the availability of (1) 
its analysis of the FY 2011 Service Contract inventory and (2) the FY 
2012 Service Contract inventory. This inventory provides information on 
service contract actions over $25,000 that were made in FY 2012. The 
information is organized by function to show how contracted resources 
are distributed throughout the agency. The inventory has been developed 
in accordance with guidance issued on December 19, 2011, by the Office 
of Management and Budget's Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). 
OFPP's guidance is available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/procurement/memo/service-contract-inventory-guidance.pdf. DNFSB has posted its FY 2011 analysis and FY 2012 
inventory and a summary of the inventory on the DNFSB homepage at the 
following link: http://www.dnfsb.gov/open.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding the service 
contract inventory should be directed to Mark Welch at 202-694-7043 or 
Mailbox@dnfsb.gov.

    Dated: February 14, 2013.
Debra H. Richardson,
Deputy General Manager.
[FR Doc. 2013-03896 Filed 2-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3670-01-P
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6785

WILLIE LEE CARTER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-99-1627) Submitted: October 31, 2000 Decided: November 15, 2000 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Willie Lee Carter, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Alan Jacobs, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Willie Lee Carter appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Carter v. Dep’t of Corr. , No. CA-99-1627 (D.S.C. Mar. 28, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### In the Matter of Kila DD. and Others, Children Alleged to be Abused and Neglected. Schoharie County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Antonio EE., Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 920]

Kane, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Schoharie County (Bartlett, III, J.), entered October 24, 2005, *1169which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 10, to extend the placement of respondent’s children and approved petitioner’s permanency plan.

Respondent’s three children were placed in foster care in December 2000. Family Court subsequently adjudicated the children abused and neglected, and this Court affirmed that determination (28 AD3d 805 [2006]). In March 2002, the court placed the children in petitioner’s custody through February 2003. This placement was later extended to March 2005. In January 2005, petitioner filed applications for further extension of the children’s placement and to terminate both parents’ parental rights, thus freeing the children for adoption. After a hearing, the court extended the placement in foster care and approved a permanency plan of adoption. Respondent appealed. Subsequent to the filing of this appeal, in March 2006, the court adjudicated the children to be permanently neglected and terminated respondent’s parental rights.*

Based on the subsequent order terminating respondent’s parental rights, the issues surrounding the order extending placement of his children in foster care are now moot *(see Matter of Natasha F.,*15 AD3d 788, 789 [2005]).

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

*

 Respondent’s appeal from this subsequent order is pending before this Court.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. M IC HAEL EAR

L YELLOW , De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 14-10140

D.C . No. 3:11-c r-08173-NVW -1 ORDER OF DISM ISSAL *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Sta t e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na Ne il V. W a ke , Distric t Judge , Pre siding Argue d August 10, 2015 Subm itte d August 25, 2015 Sa n Fra n c isc o , C a lifornia B e fore : KOZINSKI a

nd TALLM AN, C irc uit Judge s a nd PIER SOL, ** Se nior Distric t Judge
. 

# FIL ED SEP 01 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public a t ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The Honora

ble La wre nc e L. Pie rsol, Unite d State s Se nior Distric t Judge for the Distric t of South Da kota , sitting by

de signa tion.The Gove rnm e nt ha s re ne we d its m otion to dism iss the pe nding a

ppe a l ba se d on the fugitive dise n t itle m e nt doc trine
. Se e Dkt. No. 18. W e re ly on the public ly file d de c la

ra tions. Se e Dkt. No. 47. C onside ring a warrant from ove r a y e ar a go re m a ins outsta

nding for Ye llow’ s a

rre st, his whe re a

bouts a re still pre s e ntly unknown, the

U.S. M arsha ls a

re a c tive ly

looking for him and he ha s not be e n found in his usua

l a nd c ustom ary

pla c e s, a n d his pa tte rn of fa i ling to re port to his proba tion offic e r a nd follow the te rm s of his supe rvise d re le a se
— the fugitive dise ntitle m e nt doc trine a

pplie s he re . Se e Orte

ga-Rodrigue

z v . Unite d State

s , 507 U.S. 234, 239-42 (1993); W illiams v . Alame ida , 511 F.3d 973 (9th C ir. 2007). The re fore , we G RANT the Gove rnm e nt’ s m otion to dism iss, a n d we
c onditiona lly

dism iss Ye llow’ s a

ppe a l pursua

n t to the fugitive dise ntitle m e nt doc trine
. If within 30 da

y s Ye llow submits him se lf to the U.S. M arsha l s, he m ay m ove to re insta

te this a ppe a l. IT IS SO O RDE R E D.

2
#### § 626.1 Purpose.

To set forth pavement design policy for Federal-aid highway projects.
March 10, 2015

Mr. Kyle Cummings 1605 North Willow Road, 216 Urbana, IL 61801

Dear Mr. Cummings:

This letter is to inform you that we are unabl e to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we cannot proce ss your request and what you s hould do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your February 20, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA2015-0416), but we are unable to pr ocess your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR fr om which you seek relief and the extent of the relief you seek.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adve rsely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equa l to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or ar guments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any fu rther, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requi res you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days , we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additiona l time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Nia Daniels Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
p. 1 

CYTEC® 

CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC. 

Legal and Compliance Services 

Five Garret Mountain Plaza 

Woodland Park, NJ 07424 

Submitted via email (paper copy to follow via courier) 

RECEiV ED 

OPPT CBIC 

20 th DEC -9 PM 2:149 

CBIC Control Number 

362944 

November 25, 2014 

Document Control Office (7407M) 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW 

Washington, DC 20460-0001 

Attention: Docket No. EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0490 

Dear Sir or Madam, 

On October 1st, 2014, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a proposed 

Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) for "Certain 

Nonylphenols and Nonylphenol Ethoxylates". (Reference: Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 190 / 

Wednesday, October 1, 2014 / Proposed Rules / Pages 59186 — 59195) 

Cytec respectfully submits the following comments regarding current commercial activities in 

the USA with CASRN 84852-15-3 (4-nonylphenol, branched). 

Cytec Industries is a global specialty chemicals and materials company focused on developing, 

manufacturing and selling value-added products, serving a diverse range of end markets. We 

use our technology and application development expertise to create chemical and material 

solutions that are formulated to perform specific and important functions for our customers. 

Cytec purchases 4-nonylphenol, branched (CASRN 84852-15-3) from domestic suppliers in the 

USA. This substance is used as an intermediate and as an epoxy cure catalyst, both of which are 

already identified as existing uses in the proposed SNUR. In addition to these uses, Cytec also 

uses the 4-nonylphenol, branched as an additive in industrial mining formulations. These mining 

formulations are specifically used as high-performance copper solvent extractants. 

The industrial mining formulations containing 4-nonylphenol, branched have been 

manufactured at a Cytec facility in the USA as early as 1998. 

As a current and ongoing use of 4-nonylphenol, branched (CASRN 84852-15-3) as an additive in 

industrial mining formulations, we respectfully request this to be identified as an existing use in 

the final SNUR publication. 

Page 1 of 2 
CYTEE® 

CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC. 

Legal and Compliance Services 

Five Garret Mountain Plaza 

Woodland Park, NJ 07424 

Please do not hesitate to contact Cytec if you require any additional information concerning our 

products. 

Regards, 

Terry McColl 

Senior Regulatory Compliance Specialist 

Cytec Industries 

Legal and Compliance Services 

Phone: +1-404-388-5320 

terry.mccoll@cytec.com 

p. 2 

Page 2 of 2
# C_2018013EN.01001002.xml

| 15.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/10

---

Order of the President of the Sixth Chamber of the Court of 20 July 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Kehl) — C, in presence of Staatsanwaltschaft Offenburg

(Case C-346/16) (1)

1

(2018/C 013/13)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 335, 12.9.2016.

1

---