16012 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 22, 2011 / Notices 

No significant hazards consideration 

comments received: No. 

PSEG Nuclear LLC, Docket No. 50– 

354, Hope Creek Generating Station, 

Salem County, New Jersey. 

Date of application for amendment: 

March 19, 2010, as supplemented by 

letters dated July 28, 2010, and January 

10, 2011. 

Brief description of amendment: The 

amendment modifies the Technical 

Specifications (TSs) by relocating 

specific surveillance frequencies to a 

licensee-controlled program. The 

changes are based on Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission-approved TS 

Task Force (TSTF) change TSTF–425, 

Revision 3, ‘‘Relocate Surveillance 

Frequencies to Licensee Control— 

RITSTF [Risk-Informed TSTF] Initiative 

5b.’’ 

Date of issuance: February 25, 2011. 

Effective date: As of the date of 

issuance, to be implemented within 120 

days. 

Amendment No.: 187. 

Facility Operating License No. NPF– 

57: The amendment revised the TSs and 

the License. 

Date of initial notice in Federal 

Register: June 15, 2010 (75 FR 33842). 

The letters dated July 28, 2010, and 

January 10, 2011, provided clarifying 

information that did not change the 

initial proposed no significant hazards 

consideration determination or expand 

the application beyond the scope of the 

original Federal Register notice. 

The Commission’s related evaluation 

of the amendment is contained in a 

Safety Evaluation dated February 25, 

2011. 

No significant hazards consideration 

comments received: No. 

Tennessee Valley Authority, Docket No. 

50–390, Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (WBN), 

Unit 1, Rhea County, Tennessee 

Date of application for amendment: 

May 28, 2010, as supplemented 

December 1, 2010. 

Brief description of amendment: The 

amendment revised Technical 

Specification (TS) 4.2.2 ‘‘Control Rod 

Assemblies,’’ to include silver-indiumcadmium material in addition to the 

boron carbide control rod material. 

Date of issuance: February 25, 2011. 

Effective date: As of the date of 

issuance and shall be implemented no 

later than 90 days from date of issuance. 

Amendment No.: 86. 

Facility Operating License No. NPF– 

90: Amendment revised the License and 

TSs. 

Date of initial notice in Federal 

Register: July 27, 2010 (75 FR 44026). 

TVA’s supplement dated December 1, 

2010, provided additional information 

that clarified the application, did not 

expand the scope of the application as 

originally noticed proposed and did not 

change the staff’s original proposed no 

significant hazards determination as 

published in the Federal Register. 

The Commission’s related evaluation 

of the amendment is contained in a 

Safety Evaluation dated February 25, 

2011. 

No significant hazards consideration 

comments received: No. 

Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating 

Corporation, Docket No. 50–482, Wolf 

Creek Generating Station (WCGS), 

Coffey County, Kansas 

Date of amendment request: April 13, 

2010, as supplemented by letters dated 

June 1, 2010, and February 17, 2011. 

Brief description of amendment: The 

amendment revised the approved fire 

protection program, as described in the 

response to Question Q280.5 of the 

WCGS Updated Safety Analysis Report, 

by removing the high/low pressure 

interface designation of the pressurizer 

power-operated relief valves and their 

associated block valves. The 

amendment also revised license 

condition 2.C.(5)(a) to include the 

change approved by this amendment 

request. 

Date of issuance: March 9, 2011. 

Effective date: As of its date of 

issuance and shall be implemented 

within 90 days of the date of issuance. 

Amendment No.: 193. 

Renewed Facility Operating License 

No. NPF–42: The amendment revised 

the operating license and approved fire 

protection program, as described in the 

WCGS Updated Safety Analysis Report. 

Date of initial notice in Federal 

Register: June 29, 2010 (75 FR 37477). 

The supplemental letter dated February 

17, 2011, provided additional 

information that clarified the 

application, did not expand the scope of 

the application as originally noticed, 

and did not change the staff’s original 

proposed no significant hazards 

consideration determination as 

published in the Federal Register. The 

supplemental letter dated June 1, 2010, 

was included in the original notice. 

The Commission’s related evaluation 

of the amendment is contained in a 

Safety Evaluation dated March 9, 2011. 

No significant hazards consideration 

comments received: No. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 11th day 

of March 2011. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Joseph G. Giitter, 

Director, Division of Operating Reactor 

Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor 

Regulation. 

[FR Doc. 2011–6825 Filed 3–21–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[NRC–2011–0063; Docket Nos. 50–498 And 

50–499] 

STP Nuclear Operating Company, et al. 

South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2 

Notice of Consideration of Issuance of 

Amendment to Facility Operating 

License, Proposed No Significant 

Hazards Consideration Determination, 

and Opportunity for a Hearing 

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of license amendment 

request, opportunity to comment, 

opportunity to request a hearing. 

DATES: Comments must be filed by April 

21, 2011. A request for a hearing must 

be filed by May 23, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Please include Docket ID 

NRC–2011–0063 in the subject line of 

your comments. Comments submitted in 

writing or in electronic form will be 

posted on the NRC Web site and on the 

Federal rulemaking Web site http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Because your 

comments will not be edited to remove 

any identifying or contact information, 

the NRC cautions you against including 

any information in your submission that 

you do not want to be publicly 

disclosed. 

The NRC requests that any party 

soliciting or aggregating comments 

received from other persons for 

submission to the NRC inform those 

persons that the NRC will not edit their 

comments to remove any identifying or 

contact information, and therefore, they 

should not include any information in 

their comments that they do not want 

publicly disclosed. 

You may submit comments by any 

one of the following methods. 

Federal Rulemaking Web Site: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov and search 

for documents filed under Docket ID 

NRC–2011–0063. Comments may be 

submitted electronically through this 

Web site. Address questions about NRC 

dockets to Carol Gallagher 301–492– 

3668; e-mail Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. 

Mail comments to: Chief, Rules, 

Announcements and Directives Branch 

(RADB), Office of Administration, Mail 

Stop: TWB–05–B01M, U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, Washington, 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 22, 2011 / Notices 16013 

DC 20555–0001, or by fax to RADB at 

301–492–3446. 

You can access publicly available 

documents related to this notice using 

the following methods: 

NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR): 

The public may examine, and have 

copied for a fee, publicly available 

documents at the NRC’s PDR, Room O1 

F21, One White Flint North, 11555 

Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. 

These documents may also be viewed 

electronically on the public computers 

located at the NRC’s PDR at 11555 

Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 

20852. 

NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access 

and Management System (ADAMS): 

Publicly available documents created or 

received at the NRC are available 

electronically at the NRC’s Electronic 

Reading Room at http://www.nrc.gov/ 

reading-rm/adams.html. From this site, 

the public can gain entry into ADAMS, 

which provides text and image files of 

NRC’s public documents. If you do not 

have access to ADAMS or if there are 

problems in accessing the documents 

located in ADAMS, contact the NRC’s 

PDR reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 

301–415–4737, or by e-mail to 

pdr.resource@nrc.gov. 

The application for amendment, dated 

May 18, 2010, is available electronically 

under ADAMS Accession No. 

ML101450414, as supplemented by 

application dated March 1, 2011, under 

ADAMS Accession No. ML110690223. 

Federal Rulemaking Web Site: Public 

comments and supporting materials 

related to this notice can be found at 

http://www.regulations.gov by searching 

on Docket ID: NRC–2011–0063. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Balwant K. Singal, Senior Project 

Manager, Plant Licensing Branch IV, 

Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, 

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, 

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 

Washington, DC 20555. Telephone: 

301–415–3016; fax number: 301–415– 

1222; e-mail: balwant.singal@nrc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Introduction 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC, the Commission) is 

considering issuance of an amendment 

to Facility Operating License Nos. NPF– 

76 and NPF–80 issued to STP Nuclear 

Operating Company, et al. (the licensee) 

for operation of the South Texas Project 

(STP), Units 1 and 2, located in 

Matagorda County, Texas. 

The notice is being reissued in its 

entirety due to the re-submittal by the 

licensee to address NRC staff concerns. 

It was previously published in the 

Federal Register on September 21, 2010 

(75 FR 57529). The proposed 

amendment would revise Technical 

Specification (TS) 6.8.3.I, ‘‘Containment 

Post-Tensioning System Surveillance 

Program.’’ TS 6.8.3.I states that the 

containment post-tensioning system 

surveillance program shall be in 

accordance with American Society of 

Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code, 

Section XI, Subsection IWL, 1992 

Edition with 1992 Addenda, as 

supplemented by 10 CFR 

50.55a(b)(2)(viii). The proposed 

amendment removes the specific year of 

the applicable Code edition consistent 

with Revision 3.1 of NUREG–1431, 

‘‘Standard Technical Specifications, 

Westinghouse Plants’’ and will allow for 

future updates to the surveillance 

program when the applicable code 

edition changes without requiring 

additional TS changes. 

Before issuance of the proposed 

license amendment, the Commission 

will have made findings required by the 

Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended 

(the Act), and the Commission’s 

regulations. 

The Commission has made a 

proposed determination that the 

amendment request involves no 

significant hazards consideration. Under 

the Commission’s regulations in Title 10 

of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 

CFR), Section 50.92, this means that 

operation of the facility in accordance 

with the proposed amendment would 

not (1) involve a significant increase in 

the probability or consequences of an 

accident previously evaluated; or (2) 

create the possibility of a new or 

different kind of accident from any 

accident previously evaluated; or (3) 

involve a significant reduction in a 

margin of safety. As required by 10 CFR 

50.91(a), the licensee has provided its 

analysis of the issue of no significant 

hazards consideration, which is 

presented below: 

1. Does the proposed change involve a 

significant increase in the probability or 

consequences of an accident previously 

evaluated? 

Response: 

No. Inspection practices and acceptance 

standards will continue to be consistent with 

the approved ASME code edition as specified 

by 10 CFR 50.55a. 

Therefore, the proposed changes will not 

increase the probability or consequences of 

an accident previously evaluated. 

2. Does the proposed change create the 

possibility of a new or different kind of 

accident from any accident previously 

evaluated? 

Response: 

No. The proposed changes will not alter 

the plant configuration (no new or different 

type of equipment will be installed) or 

require any unusual operator actions. The 

proposed changes will not alter the way any 

structure, system, or component functions, 

and will not significantly alter the manner in 

which the plant is operated. The response of 

the plant and the operators following an 

accident will not be different. In addition, the 

proposed change does not introduce any new 

failure modes. 

Therefore, the proposed changes will not 

create the possibility of a new or different 

kind of accident from any accident 

previously analyzed. 

3. Does the proposed change involve a 

significant reduction in a margin of safety? 

Response: 

No. Containment tendon inspection 

practices and acceptance standards will 

continue to be consistent with the applicable 

ASME code edition. There is no change in 

surveillance acceptance criteria. 

Therefore, the proposed changes will not 

result in a reduction in a margin of safety. 

The NRC staff has reviewed the 

licensee’s analysis and, based on this 

review, it appears that the three 

standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are 

satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff 

proposes to determine that the 

amendment request involves no 

significant hazards consideration. 

The Commission is seeking public 

comments on this proposed 

determination. Any comments received 

by April 21, 2011 will be considered in 

making any final determination. You 

may submit comments using any of the 

methods discussed under the 

ADDRESSES caption. 

Normally, the Commission will not 

issue the amendment until the 

expiration of 60 days after the date of 

publication of this notice. The 

Commission may issue the license 

amendment before expiration of the 60- 

day period provided that its final 

determination is that the amendment 

involves no significant hazards 

consideration. In addition, the 

Commission may issue the amendment 

prior to the expiration of the 30-day 

comment period should circumstances 

change during the 30-day comment 

period such that failure to act in a 

timely way would result, for example, 

in derating or shutdown of the facility. 

Should the Commission take action 

prior to the expiration of either the 

comment period or the notice period, it 

will publish in the Federal Register a 

notice of issuance. Should the 

Commission make a final No Significant 

Hazards Consideration Determination, 

any hearing will take place after 

issuance. The Commission expects that 

the need to take this action will occur 

very infrequently. 

II. Opportunity To Request a Hearing 

Requirements for hearing requests and 

petitions for leave to intervene are 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
16014 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 22, 2011 / Notices 

found in 10 CFR 2.309, ‘‘Hearing 

requests, petitions to intervene, 

requirements for standing, and 

contentions.’’ Interested persons should 

consult 10 CFR Part 2, Section 2.309, 

which is available at the NRC’s Public 

Document Room (PDR), located at O1 

F21, One White Flint North, 11555 

Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852 (or 

call the PDR at 800–397–4209 or 301– 

415–4737). NRC regulations are also 

accessible electronically from the NRC’s 

Electronic Reading Room on the NRC 

Web site at http://www.nrc.gov. 

III. Petitions for Leave To Intervene 

Any person whose interest may be 

affected by this proceeding and who 

wishes to participate as a party in the 

proceeding must file a written petition 

for leave to intervene. As required by 10 

CFR 2.309, a petition for leave to 

intervene shall set forth with 

particularity the interest of the 

requestor/petitioner in the proceeding 

and how that interest may be affected by 

the results of the proceeding. The 

petition must provide the name, 

address, and telephone number of the 

requestor or petitioner and specifically 

explain the reasons why the 

intervention should be permitted with 

particular reference to the following 

factors: (1) The nature of the requestor’s/ 

petitioner’s right under the Act to be 

made a party to the proceeding; (2) the 

nature and extent of the requestor’s/ 

petitioner’s property, financial, or other 

interest in the proceeding; and (3) the 

possible effect of any decision or order 

which may be entered in the proceeding 

on the requestor’s/petitioner’s interest. 

The petition must also identify the 

specific contentions which the 

requestor/petitioner seeks to have 

litigated at the proceeding. 

A petition for leave to intervene must 

also include a specification of the 

contentions that the petitioner seeks to 

have litigated in the hearing. For each 

contention, the requestor/petitioner 

must provide a specific statement of the 

issue of law or fact to be raised or 

controverted, as well as a brief 

explanation of the basis for the 

contention. Additionally, the requestor/ 

petitioner must demonstrate that the 

issue raised by each contention is 

within the scope of the proceeding and 

is material to the findings the NRC must 

make to support the granting of a license 

amendment in response to the 

application. The petition must include a 

concise statement of the alleged facts or 

expert opinions which support the 

position of the requestor/petitioner and 

on which the requestor/petitioner 

intends to rely at hearing, together with 

references to the specific sources and 

documents on which the requestor/ 

petitioner intends to rely. Finally, the 

petition must provide sufficient 

information to show that a genuine 

dispute exists with the applicant on a 

material issue of law or fact, including 

references to specific portions of the 

application for amendment that the 

requestor/petitioner disputes and the 

supporting reasons for each dispute, or, 

if the requestor/petitioner believes that 

the application for amendment fails to 

contain information on a relevant matter 

as required by law, the identification of 

each failure and the supporting reasons 

for the requestor’s/petitioner’s belief. 

Each contention must be one which, if 

proven, would entitle the requestor/ 

petitioner to relief. 

Those permitted to intervene become 

parties to the proceeding, subject to any 

limitations in the order granting leave to 

intervene, and have the opportunity to 

participate fully in the conduct of the 

hearing with respect to resolution of 

that person’s admitted contentions, 

including the opportunity to present 

evidence and to submit a crossexamination plan for cross-examination 

of witnesses, consistent with NRC 

regulations, policies, and procedures. 

The Licensing Board will set the time 

and place for any prehearing 

conferences and evidentiary hearings, 

and the appropriate notices will be 

provided. 

Non-timely petitions for leave to 

intervene and contentions, amended 

petitions, and supplemental petitions 

will not be entertained absent a 

determination by the Commission, the 

Licensing Board or a Presiding Officer 

that the petition should be granted and/ 

or the contentions should be admitted 

based upon a balancing of the factors 

specified in 10 CFR 2.309(c)(1)(i)–(viii). 

A State, county, municipality, 

Federally-recognized Indian tribe, or 

agencies thereof, may submit a petition 

to the Commission to participate as a 

party under 10 CFR 2.309(d)(2). The 

petition should state the nature and 

extent of the petitioner’s interest in the 

proceeding. The petition should be 

submitted to the Commission by May 

23, 2011. The petition must be filed in 

accordance with the filing instructions 

in the section below entitled ‘‘Electronic 

Submissions (E-Filing),’’ and should 

meet the requirements for petitions for 

leave to intervene set forth in this 

section, except that State and Federallyrecognized Indian tribes do not need to 

address the standing requirements in 10 

CFR 2.309(d)(1) if the facility is located 

within its boundaries. The entities listed 

above could also seek to participate in 

a hearing as a nonparty pursuant to 10 

CFR 2.315(c). 

Any person who does not wish, or is 

not qualified, to become a party to this 

proceeding may request permission to 

make a limited appearance pursuant to 

the provisions of 10 CFR 2.315(a). A 

person making a limited appearance 

may make an oral or written statement 

of position on the issues, but may not 

otherwise participate in the proceeding. 

A limited appearance may be made at 

any session of the hearing or at any 

prehearing conference, subject to such 

limits and conditions as may be 

imposed by the Licensing Board. 

Persons desiring to make a limited 

appearance are requested to inform the 

Secretary of the Commission by May 23, 

2011. 

If a hearing is requested, the 

Commission will make a final 

determination on the issue of no 

significant hazards consideration. The 

final determination will serve to decide 

when the hearing is held. If the final 

determination is that the amendment 

request involves no significant hazards 

consideration, the Commission may 

issue the amendment and make it 

immediately effective, notwithstanding 

the request for a hearing. Any hearing 

held would take place after issuance of 

the amendment. If the final 

determination is that the amendment 

request involves a significant hazards 

consideration, any hearing held would 

take place before the issuance of any 

amendment. 

IV Electronic Submissions (E-Filing) 

All documents filed in NRC 

adjudicatory proceedings, including a 

request for hearing, a petition for leave 

to intervene, any motion or other 

document filed in the proceeding prior 

to the submission of a request for 

hearing or petition to intervene, and 

documents filed by interested 

governmental entities participating 

under 10 CFR 2.315(c), must be filed in 

accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule 

(72 FR 49139, August 28, 2007). The EFiling process requires participants to 

submit and serve all adjudicatory 

documents over the Internet, or in some 

cases to mail copies on electronic 

storage media. Participants may not 

submit paper copies of their filings 

unless they seek an exemption in 

accordance with the procedures 

described below. 

To comply with the procedural 

requirements of E-Filing, at least ten 

(10) days prior to the filing deadline, the 

participant should contact the Office of 

the Secretary by e-mail at 

hearing.docket@nrc.gov, or by telephone 

at 301–415–1677, to request (1) a digital 

ID certificate, which allows the 

participant (or its counsel or 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 22, 2011 / Notices 16015 

representative) to digitally sign 

documents and access the E-Submittal 

server for any proceeding in which it is 

participating; and (2) advise the 

Secretary that the participant will be 

submitting a request or petition for 

hearing (even in instances in which the 

participant, or its counsel or 

representative, already holds an NRCissued digital ID certificate). Based upon 

this information, the Secretary will 

establish an electronic docket for the 

hearing in this proceeding if the 

Secretary has not already established an 

electronic docket. 

Information about applying for a 

digital ID certificate is available on 

NRC’s public Web site at http:// 

www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/ 

apply-certificates.html. System 

requirements for accessing the ESubmittal server are detailed in NRC’s 

‘‘Guidance for Electronic Submission,’’ 

which is available on the agency’s 

public Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/ 

site-help/e-submittals.html. Participants 

may attempt to use other software not 

listed on the Web site, but should note 

that the NRC’s E-Filing system does not 

support unlisted software, and the NRC 

Meta System Help Desk will not be able 

to offer assistance in using unlisted 

software. 

If a participant is electronically 

submitting a document to the NRC in 

accordance with the E-Filing rule, the 

participant must file the document 

using the NRC’s online, Web-based 

submission form. In order to serve 

documents through EIE, users will be 

required to install a Web browser plugin from the NRC Web site. Further 

information on the Web-based 

submission form, including the 

installation of the Web browser plug-in, 

is available on the NRC’s public Web 

site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html. 

Once a participant has obtained a 

digital ID certificate and a docket has 

been created, the participant can then 

submit a request for hearing or petition 

for leave to intervene. Submissions 

should be in Portable Document Format 

(PDF) in accordance with NRC guidance 

available on the NRC public Web site at 

http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html. A filing is considered 

complete at the time the documents are 

submitted through the NRC’s E-Filing 

system. To be timely, an electronic 

filing must be submitted to the E-Filing 

system no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern 

Time on the due date. Upon receipt of 

a transmission, the E-Filing system 

time-stamps the document and sends 

the submitter an e-mail notice 

confirming receipt of the document. The 

E-Filing system also distributes an email notice that provides access to the 

document to the NRC Office of the 

General Counsel and any others who 

have advised the Office of the Secretary 

that they wish to participate in the 

proceeding, so that the filer need not 

serve the documents on those 

participants separately. Therefore, 

applicants and other participants (or 

their counsel or representative) must 

apply for and receive a digital ID 

certificate before a hearing request/ 

petition to intervene is filed so that they 

can obtain access to the document via 

the E-Filing system. 

A person filing electronically using 

the agency’s adjudicatory E-Filing 

system may seek assistance by 

contacting the NRC Meta System Help 

Desk through the ‘‘Contact Us’’ link 

located on the NRC Web site at http:// 

www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html, by e-mail at 

MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov, or by a tollfree call at 866–672–7640. The NRC 

Meta System Help Desk is available 

between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern 

Time, Monday through Friday, 

excluding government holidays. 

Participants who believe that they 

have a good cause for not submitting 

documents electronically must file an 

exemption request, in accordance with 

10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper 

filing requesting authorization to 

continue to submit documents in paper 

format. Such filings must be submitted 

by: (1) First-class mail addressed to the 

Office of the Secretary of the 

Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission, Washington, DC 20555– 

0001, Attention: Rulemaking and 

Adjudications Staff; or (2) courier, 

express mail, or expedited delivery 

service to the Office of the Secretary, 

Sixteenth Floor, One White Flint North, 

11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 

Maryland, 20852, Attention: 

Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff. 

Participants filing a document in this 

manner are responsible for serving the 

document on all other participants. 

Filing is considered complete by firstclass mail as of the time of deposit in 

the mail, or by courier, express mail, or 

expedited delivery service upon 

depositing the document with the 

provider of the service. A presiding 

officer, having granted an exemption 

request from using E-Filing, may require 

a participant or party to use E-Filing if 

the presiding officer subsequently 

determines that the reason for granting 

the exemption from use of E-Filing no 

longer exists. 

Documents submitted in adjudicatory 

proceedings will appear in NRC’s 

electronic hearing docket which is 

available to the public at http:// 

ehd1.nrc.gov/EHD/ unless excluded 

pursuant to an order of the Commission, 

or the presiding officer. Participants are 

requested not to include personal 

privacy information, such as social 

security numbers, home addresses, or 

home phone numbers in their filings, 

unless an NRC regulation or other law 

requires submission of such 

information. With respect to 

copyrighted works, except for limited 

excerpts that serve the purpose of the 

adjudicatory filings and would 

constitute a Fair Use application, 

participants are requested not to include 

copyrighted materials in their 

submission. 

Petitions for leave to intervene must 

be filed no later than 60 days from 

March 22, 2011. Non-timely filings will 

not be entertained absent a 

determination by the presiding officer 

that the petition or request should be 

granted or the contentions should be 

admitted, based on a balancing of the 

factors specified in 10 CFR 

2.309(c)(1)(i)–(viii). 

V. Further Information 

For further details with respect to this 

license amendment application, see the 

application for amendment dated May 

18, 2010, as supplemented by 

application dated March 1, 2011, which 

are available for public inspection at the 

Commission’s PDR, located at One 

White Flint North, File Public Area O1 

F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), 

Rockville, Maryland. Publicly available 

records will be accessible electronically 

from the Agencywide Documents 

Access and Management System’s 

(ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading 

Room on the Internet at the NRC Web 

site, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ 

adams.html. Persons who do not have 

access to ADAMS or who encounter 

problems in accessing the documents 

located in ADAMS, should contact the 

NRC PDR Reference staff by telephone 

at 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or 

by e-mail to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. 

Attorney for licensee: A. H. 

Gutterman, Esq., Morgan, Lewis & 

Bockius, 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, 

NW., Washington, DC 20004. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day 

of March 2011. 

For The Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Balwant K. Singal, 

Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing 

Branch IV, Division of Operating Reactor 

Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor 

Regulation. 

[FR Doc. 2011–6667 Filed 3–21–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES