alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 94/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2009.094.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 94 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5223 April 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2009.094.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 94

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5223 April 2009

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2009/C 094/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2009/C 094/02 | Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production of agricultural products and amending Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 | 2 |
| 2009/C 094/03 | List of central authorities nominated by the Member States to deal with the return of cultural objects unlawfully removed from a Member State and applying Article 3 of Directive 93/7/EEC | 8 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2009/C 094/01

Euro exchange rates

1

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2009/C 094/02

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production of agricultural products and amending Regulation (EC) No 70/2001

2

2009/C 094/03

List of central authorities nominated by the Member States to deal with the return of cultural objects unlawfully removed from a Member State and applying Article 3 of Directive 93/7/EEC

8

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY |
| | Commission |
| 2009/C 094/04 | Notice of initiation of an expiry review of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of ammonium nitrate originating in Ukraine | 15 |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY |
| | Commission |
| 2009/C 094/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5490 — MOL/INA) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 20 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY

Commission

2009/C 094/04

Notice of initiation of an expiry review of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of ammonium nitrate originating in Ukraine

15

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY

Commission

2009/C 094/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5490 — MOL/INA) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

20

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
###### Editorial Note on Part 635

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 635 appear at 67 FR 75924, Dec. 10, 2002.

#### § 635.301 Purpose.

To prescribe the policies and procedures under which a State transportation department may be authorized to advance a Federal-aid highway project to the physical construction stage.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Joseph James Craver, Appellant

No. 06

- 19

- 00101

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 71st District Court of Harrison County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 16

- 0317X ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Burgess

and Justice Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Joseph James Craver, has adequately indicated his inability to

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JANUARY 17, 2020

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
§ 91.61 Subgrantee's responsibilities. If delegated by the grantee, the subgrantee shall: ( a ) Prepare (if the required expertise exists) or contract for the preparation of an environmental assessment (EA); and
( b ) Submit all environmental assessments through the grantee to OJP for review and the issuance of a draft finding of no significant impact (FONSI) or a determination that an environmental impact statement (EIS) is required. If OJP issues a draft FONSI, the grantee agency shall make the draft FONSI and the underlying EA available for public comment.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133145 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

ERIC SHANBURN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133145 

 COA: 271434 

Oakland CC: 2004-059337-NO 

CARLESIMO PRODUCTS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

ANGELO’S SUPPLIES, INC.,

 Defendant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 28, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the 

completion of the proceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals. 

t0416 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 24, 2007 

 Clerk
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Felice P. Farricchia, Appellant.

Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.
### §460s–6. Taxing power

Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed as prohibiting governmental jurisdiction in the State of Michigan from assessing taxes upon any interest in real estate retained under the provisions of section 460s–10 of this title to the owner of such interest.

(Pub. L. 89–668, §7, Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 923.)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 68993 / February 27, 2013

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-14899 

____________________________________

 :

In the Matter of :

 :

OXFORD INVESTMENT :

PARTNERS, LLC AND :

WALTER J. CLARKE, : ORDER APPOINTING 

: TAX ADMINISTRATOR 

Respondents. :

____________________________________:

By order dated January 17, 2013, the Commission issued the “Omnibus Order 

Directing the Appointment of Tax Administrator in Administrative Proceedings that 

Establish Distribution Funds” (“Omnibus Order”), Rel. No. 34-68683, authorizing the 

Secretary to issue orders during calendar years 2013-2015 appointing, upon request by 

the Commission staff, Damasco and Associates, LLP (“Damasco”), a certified public 

accounting firm located in Half Moon Bay, California, as tax administrator (“Tax 

Administrator”) in administrative proceedings where the distribution fund may incur 

tax-related obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) under the Department of 

the Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

On February 26, 2013, the Commission staff requested, pursuant to the 

Omnibus Order, the appointment of Damasco as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in 

the above-referenced proceeding.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Damasco, pursuant to and in accordance with the Omnibus 

Order, is appointed the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced 

proceeding. 

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Elizabeth M. Murphy

Secretary
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6232

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

SHAWN KEITH HARRIS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. 

Voorhees, District Judge. (5:02-cr-00005-RLV-4)

Submitted: September 17, 2012 Decided: October 2, 2012

Before DIAZ, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shawn Keith Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Shawn Keith Harris appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United 

States v. Harris, No. 5:02-cr-00005-RLV-4 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 24, 

2012). We deny the motion for transcript at the government's 

expense and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
Mi Bebé

•	 Vacunarse contra la gripe (influenza) es una

forma segura de protegerse contra la gripe y de

prevenir posibles complicaciones del embarazo

asociadas con ella.

•	 Por muchos años, millones de embarazadas

han recibido la vacuna contra la gripe en forma

segura.

•	 Habla con tu médico sobre la vacuna contra la

gripe durante el embarazo.

Para más información en español visite:

http://www.cdc.gov/flu
### §590h–4. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–127, title III, §336(a)(2)(G), Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1006

Section, act Aug. 3, 1956, ch. 950, §6(b), 70 Stat. 1033, provided conditions for payments of grants.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1003

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1003 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and at 68 FR 10350, Mar. 5, 2003.

#### § 1003.7 Notice of certification.

Whenever, in accordance with the provisions of § 1003.1(c), a case is certified to the Board, the noncitizen or other party affected shall be given notice of certification. An immigration judge or DHS officer may certify a case only after an initial decision has been made and before an appeal has been taken. If it is known at the time the initial decision is rendered that the case will be certified, the notice of certification shall be included in such decision and no further notice of certification shall be required. If it is not known until after the initial decision is rendered that the case will be certified, the office of DHS or the Immigration Court having administrative control over the record of proceeding shall cause a Notice of Certification to be served upon the parties. In either case, the notice shall inform the parties that the case is required to be certified to the Board and that they have the right to make representations before the Board, including the making of a request for oral argument and the submission of a brief. If either party desires to submit a brief, it shall be submitted to the office of DHS or the Immigration Court having administrative control over the record of proceeding for transmittal to the Board within the time prescribed in § 1003.3(c). The case shall be certified and forwarded to the Board by the office of DHS or Immigration Court having administrative jurisdiction over the case upon receipt of the brief, or upon the expiration of the time within which the brief may be submitted, or upon receipt of a written waiver of the right to submit a brief. The Board in its discretion may elect to accept for review or not accept for review any such certified case. If the Board declines to accept a certified case for review, the underlying decision shall become final on the date the Board declined to accept the case.

[61 FR 18907, Apr. 29, 1996, as amended at 85 FR 81655, Dec. 16, 2020; 89 FR 46791, May 29, 2024]
### §§5801 to 5809. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–334, title II, §2813, Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4602

Section 5801, Pub. L. 104–127, title III, §352, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1010, defined terms in this chapter.

Section 5802, Pub. L. 104–127, title III, §353, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1010, established National Natural Resources Conservation Foundation as a charitable and nonprofit corporation to promote innovative solutions to the problems associated with the conservation of natural resources on private lands.

Section 5803, Pub. L. 104–127, title III, §354, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1011, directed administration of the Foundation by a Board of Trustees and set forth provisions relating to its composition and operation.

Section 5804, Pub. L. 104–127, title III, §355, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1012, related to appointment and hiring of officers and employees by the Board.

Section 5805, Pub. L. 104–127, title III, §356, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1013; Pub. L. 107–171, title II, §2506, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 274, related to corporate powers and obligations of the Foundation.

Section 5806, Pub. L. 104–127, title III, §357, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1014, authorized provision of administrative services and support by the Department of Agriculture.

Section 5807, Pub. L. 104–127, title III, §358, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1014; Pub. L. 105–225, §6(b), Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1499, directed auditing of Foundation accounts by the Attorney General.

Section 5808, Pub. L. 104–127, title III, §359, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1014, related to release of the United States from liability for any debt, default, act, or omission of the Foundation.

Section 5809, Pub. L. 104–127, title III, §360, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1014, authorized appropriations.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 104–127, title III, §351, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1010, which provided that subtitle F (§§351–360) of title III of Pub. L. 104–127 could be cited as the "National Natural Resources Conservation Foundation Act", was repealed by Pub. L. 115–334, title II, §2813, Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4602.
§ 513.42 Inmate access to medical records. ( a ) Except for the limitations of paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section, an inmate may review records from his or her medical file (including dental records) by submitting a request to a staff member designated by the Warden.
( b ) Laboratory reports which contain only scientific testing results and which contain no staff evaluation or opinion (such as Standard Form 514A, Urinalysis) are ordinarily disclosable. Lab results of HIV testing may be reviewed by the inmate. However, an inmate may not retain a copy of his or her test results while the inmate is confined in a Bureau facility or a Community Corrections Center. A copy of an inmate's HIV test results may be forwarded to a third party outside the institution and chosen by the inmate, provided that the inmate gives written authorization for the disclosure.
( c ) Medical records containing subjective evaluations and opinions of medical staff relating to the inmate's care and treatment will be provided to the inmate only after the staff review required by paragraph (d) of this section. These records include, but are not limited to, outpatient notes, consultation reports, narrative summaries or reports by a specialist, operative reports by the physician, summaries by specialists as the result of laboratory analysis, or in-patient progress reports.
( d ) Prior to release to the inmate, records described in paragraph (c) of this section shall be reviewed by staff to determine if the release of this information would present a harm to either the inmate or other individuals. Any records determined not to present a harm will be released to the inmate at the conclusion of the review by staff. If any records are determined by staff not to be releasable based upon the presence of harm, the inmate will be so advised in writing and provided the address of the agency component to which the inmate may address a formal request for the withheld records. An accounting of any medical records will be maintained in the inmate's medical file.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 395 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 395

 Recognizing the 40th anniversary of the Iran Hostage Crisis, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 31, 2019

Mr. Isakson (for himself, Mr. Blumenthal, and Mr. Leahy) submitted the 
 following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign 
                               Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing the 40th anniversary of the Iran Hostage Crisis, and for 
                            other purposes.

Whereas, on November 4, 1979, 66 United States diplomats, military personnel, 
        and civilians were taken hostage from the United States Embassy in 
        Tehran by the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran in what became 
        known as the Iran Hostage Crisis;
Whereas 13 of the 66 American hostages were released by November 20, 1979;
Whereas 8 members of the United States Armed Forces died in an attempt to rescue 
        the hostages on April 25, 1980;
Whereas another American hostage was released on July 11, 1980, after 250 days 
        in captivity;
Whereas, after 444 days in captivity, the remaining 52 hostages were released on 
        January 20, 1981, with the signing of the Algiers Accords;
Whereas the Iran Hostages were subjected to mock executions and other forms of 
        physical and emotional torture at the hands of the Government of the 
        Islamic Republic of Iran;
Whereas the Iran Hostages and their families still suffer from the events of the 
        Iran Hostage Crisis;
Whereas the Algiers Accords prevented the Iran Hostages from taking legal action 
        to pursue compensation from the Islamic Republic of Iran for their time 
        in captivity;
Whereas many of the Iran Hostages and their families finally became eligible to 
        receive compensation through the enactment in 2015 of the Justice for 
        United States Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Act (34 U.S.C. 20144) 
        and the creation of the United States Victims of State Sponsored 
        Terrorism Fund; and
Whereas, 40 years after its founding, the Islamic Republic of Iran continues to 
        promulgate a culture of fear, oppression, and violence as one of the 
        leading state sponsors of terrorism: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes the 40th anniversary of the Iran Hostage 
        Crisis;
            (2) honors the suffering of the Iran Hostages and their 
        families during the Iran Hostage Crisis, as well as the 
        sacrifices made by those who attempted to rescue the hostages; 
        and
            (3) supports the designation of a national day of 
        remembrance on November 4, 2019, for the Iran Hostage Crisis.
                                 <all>
```
### §460dd–7. Proposed road study

#### (a) Criteria and environmental impact of specific route

The Secretary, together with the Highway Department of the State of Utah, shall conduct a study of proposed road alinements within and adjacent to the recreation area. Such study shall locate the specific route of a scenic, low-speed road, hereby authorized, from Glen Canyon City to Bullfrog Basin, crossing the Escalante River south of the point where the river has entered Lake Powell when the lake is at the three thousand seven hundred-foot level. In determining the route for this road, special care shall be taken to minimize any adverse environmental impact and said road is not required to meet ordinary secondary road standards as to grade, alinement, and curvature. Turnouts, overlooks, and scenic vistas may be included in the road plan. In no event shall said route cross the Escalante River north of Stephens Arch.

#### (b) Timetable

The study shall include a reasonable timetable for the engineering, planning, and construction of the road authorized in subsection (a) and the Secretary of the Interior shall adhere to said timetable in every way feasible to him.

#### (c) Markers and other interpretative devices

The Secretary is authorized to construct and maintain markers and other interpretative devices consistent with highway safety standards.

#### (d) Additional roads

The study specified in subsection (a) hereof shall designate what additional roads are appropriate and necessary for full utilization of the area for the purposes of this subchapter and to connect with all roads of ingress to, and egress from the recreation area.

#### (e) Report to Congress

The findings and conclusions of the Secretary and the Highway Department of the State of Utah, specified in subsection (a), shall be submitted to Congress within two years of October 27, 1972, and shall include recommendations for any further legislation necessary to implement the findings and conclusions. It shall specify the funds necessary for appropriation in order to meet the timetable fixed in subsection (b).

(Pub. L. 92–593, §8, Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1312.)
# Official Journal L 335/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 335 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6422 September 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 335

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6422 September 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1690 of 20 September 2021 concerning the extension of the action taken by Malta Competition and Consumer Affairs Authority permitting the making available on the market and use of the biocidal product Biobor JF in accordance with Article 55(1) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council
  (notified under document C(2021) 6691) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1690 of 20 September 2021 concerning the extension of the action taken by Malta Competition and Consumer Affairs Authority permitting the making available on the market and use of the biocidal product Biobor JF in accordance with Article 55(1) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council
  (notified under document C(2021) 6691)

(notified under document C(2021) 6691)

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.