alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §5010. Additional prohibitions and enforcement

For additional prohibitions relating to this chapter and enforcement of this chapter, see section 1826g of this title.

(Pub. L. 102–567, title VIII, §811, Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4314; Pub. L. 102–587, title VIII, §8011, Nov. 4, 1992, 106 Stat. 5103; Pub. L. 106–562, title III, §304(a), Dec. 23, 2000, 114 Stat. 2806; Pub. L. 114–81, title I, §103(b), Nov. 5, 2015, 129 Stat. 657.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Title VIII of Pub. L. 102–567 and Pub. L. 102–587 enacted substantially identical sections. Title VIII of Pub. L. 102–587 was repealed by Pub. L. 106–562.

#### Amendments

2015—Pub. L. 114–81 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to civil penalties, offenses, and forfeiture.
October 12, 1999

VIA HAND DELIVERY

Mr. David Bassett-Parkins
Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Netgateway, Inc.
300 Oceangate
Suite 500
Long Beach, CA 90802

         Re:  Termination of Option Agreements

Dear David:

         Reference is made to: (a) the Netgateway,  Inc. Stock Option  Agreement
Pursuant to the 1998 Stock Option Plan for Senior Executives, by and between you
and Netgateway Inc. (the "Company"),  dated as of December 15, 1998, pursuant to
which you were granted the right and option to purchase  from the Company all or
a part of an  aggregate  of 400,000  shares of common  stock of the Company at a
purchase price of $4.87 per share, subject to the terms and conditions contained
therein;  and (b) the Netgateway,  Inc. Stock Option  Agreement  Pursuant to the
1998  Stock  Option  Plan for  Senior  Executives,  by and  between  you and the
"Company", dated as of December 15, 1998, pursuant to which you were granted the
right and option to purchase  from the Company all or a part of an  aggregate of
240,000  shares of common stock of the Company at a purchase  price of $2.50 per
share, subject to the terms and conditions contained therein (collectively,  the
"Option Agreements").

         This  will  confirm  that you and the  Company  agree  that the  Option
Agreements shall be, and hereby are, terminated in all respects, effective as of
the date  hereof.  Any and all  options  granted  under the  Option  Agreements,
whether vested or unvested,  shall be deemed  forfeited,  and all of your rights
under the Option Agreements, if any, shall be terminated.

         Please  acknowledge  your  consent to the  foregoing  by signing in the
space provided below and returning a copy of this letter to the Company.


                                     Very truly yours,

                                     NETGATEWAY, INC.

                                         /s/ Roy W. Camblin III
                                     By: ______________________
                                         Roy W. Camblin III
                                         Chief Executive Officer

ACCEPTED AND AGREED:

/s/ David Bassett-Parkins
--------------------------
David Bassett-Parkins

Dated:  October 12, 1999
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 3 (Thursday, January 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 530-531]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-33830]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7714]

Department of State Advisory Committee on Private International 
Law: Notice of Renewal of Charter

    The Charter of the Department of State's Advisory Committee on 
Private International Law has been renewed, effective for a two-year 
period. Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notification of 
the renewal was provided to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, the 
House Foreign Affairs Committee, and the Library of Congress on 
December 16, 2011. The Advisory Committee assists the State Department 
to monitor domestic and international developments in private 
international law; provides a means for state, local and private sector 
viewpoints to be made available to the Department; and provides 
information to assist in the development of positions for efforts to 
harmonize or negotiate uniform rules of private law at the 
international level through model national laws, legal guidelines, 
treaties, and other means.

[[Page 531]]

    The Advisory Committee focuses on work undertaken or proposed in 
various international bodies, including but not limited to the Hague 
Conference on Private International Law; the United Nations Commission 
on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), the International Institute for 
the Unification of Private Law (UNIDROIT), and the Organization of 
American States (OAS).
    Topics considered by the Advisory Committee have included, for 
example: jurisdiction and enforcement of foreign judgments; party 
choice of forum; arbitration rules; enforcement of foreign arbitral 
awards; the protection of minors; inter-country adoption; child 
abduction; cross-border insolvency; electronic commerce; secured 
finance; carriage of goods by sea and by other modes of transportation; 
cross-border securities transactions; online dispute resolution; 
international leasing and franchising; and other topics of current 
interest in private law as they arise.
    Advisory Committee meetings are open to the public, and 
participation by the public is encouraged. Interested persons, 
organizations, academic centers and others can participate in all 
aspects of the Committee's work. Notices of meetings are published in 
the Federal Register at least 15 calendar days prior to the meeting 
date, unless circumstances require that the meeting be held with a 
shorter notice period. Interested parties can obtain additional 
information from the Office of the Assistant Legal Adviser for Private 
International Law (L/PIL), Department of State, at (202) 776-8420, fax 
776-8482, or by email to Tricia Smeltzer at SmeltzerTK@State.gov.

    Dated: December 23, 2011.
Harold S. Burman,
Executive Director, Department of State Advisory, Committee on Private 
International Law.
[FR Doc. 2011-33830 Filed 1-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
```
National Cancer Institute
 

U.S. Department 

of HealtH anD 

HUman ServiceS 

national institutes 

of Health 

caGrid 


caBIG

®-interoperable systems architecture 

Interoperability has become an essential driver of biomedical research: interoperable IT systems provide 

researchers with access to data, tools, and computational capacity in order to power information 

exchange and collaboration, and to speed the pace of research. caGrid is the underlying information 

technology grid infrastructure developed by the National Cancer Institute to enable connectivity 

among interested organizations, allowing researchers to tap into the growing collection of cancer 

research and outcomes data while supporting individual and collaborative investigations. caGrid helps 

researchers securely share information and analytic resources using locally managed access control 

policies and by using strongly typed data objects in XML format. 

Features 

•		Nationally	deployed,	standards-compliant,	data	and	analysis	grid	that	any	caBIG

®-interoperable	

system can plug into or draw from 

•	Semantically	discoverable	and	described	services

•	Rich	runtime	metadata	infrastructure

•	Uniform	data	query	and	retrieval	across	systems

•	Federated	security	and	identity	management	to	support	controlled	access	to	systems

•		Business	Process	Execution	Language	(BPEL)	workflow	engine	for	data	analysis	pipeline	

construction and execution 

•		Support	for	additional	workflow	tools,	including	the	Taverna	2.0	workbench

•	Federated,	cross-domain	data	mining	and	integration

•	Standardized	programming	interfaces	for	application	developers

•	Graphical	service	development	toolkit

caGrid structure 

Categories of Use: 

Biospecimens Data Sharing Imaging Proteomics

Clinical Trials Genome Annotation Microarrays Translational	Research

Management Infrastructure Pathways Vocabularies 

Data Analysis 

&	Statistical	Tools
 

 

Key Contributors: 

•		NCI	Center	for	Biomedical	

Informatics and Information 

Technology	(NCI	CBIIT)

•	The	Ohio	State	University

•	Emory	University

•		Argonne	National	

Laboratory 

caGrid: caBIG ® -interoperable systems architecture 

caGrid 

caBIG®-interoperable systems architecture 

Architecture Overview 

•		Application type: Grid infrastructure 

•		System requirements:	Java	installation	and	network	connectivity

Installation and Administration 

•	caGrid Security Administration: Experience	in	IT	security,	basic	

understanding	of	digital	certificate	concepts,	and	group-based	

authorization concepts 

•	Infrastructure:	Desktop/Server,	network

•		Long-term administration:	Network/system	administration,	

if running services 

Resources 

Primary Workspace https://cabig.nci.nih.gov/workspaces/

Architecture/caGrid/

Tool Overview Page https://cabig.nci.nih.gov/sharable/cagrid_

overview 

caGrid Knowledge Center https://cabig-kc.nci.nih.gov/CaGrid/KC/

caBIG® Tool Inventory https://cabig.nci.nih.gov/inventory

caBIG® Support Service 

Providers https://cabig.nci.nih.gov/esn/service_providers

NCI Center for Bioinformatics 

Applications Support ncicb@pop.nci.nih.gov 

niH publication no. 10-7641 

printed august 2010
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of BlastGard International, Inc., that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the companys financial condition and results of operations.



|                          |  |     |  |                        
|------------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Dated:  November 14, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ James F. Gordon    
|                          |  |     |  | James F. Gordon        
|                          |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
### §54. Sale of matured, dead, or down timber

The Secretary of the Interior may sell and permit the removal of such matured or dead or down timber as he may deem necessary or advisable for the protection or improvement of the park, and the proceeds derived therefrom shall be deposited and covered into the Treasury as miscellaneous receipts.

(Apr. 9, 1912, ch. 74, §4, 37 Stat. 81.)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 67783 / September 5, 2012

Administrative Proceeding

File No. 3-14950

____________________________________

 :

In the Matter of :

 :

Centaur Management Co. LLC : EXTENSION ORDER

:

Respondent. :

____________________________________:

The Division of Enforcement (“Division”) has requested an extension of time, until 

March 6, 2013, to submit a proposed Plan of Distribution pursuant to Rule 1101(a) of the 

Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans.

In its request, the Division states that since the issuance of the Commission’s July 17,

2012, Order Instituting Administrative and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings pursuant to Sections

203(e) and 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”), Making 

Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order against Centaur

Management Co. LLC (“Centaur”) finding that Centaur willfully violated Sections 206(2) and 

206(4) of the Advisers Act and Rule 206(4)-8 promulgated thereunder, the Division has began 

to assess the feasibility of distribution. The Division requires additional time to continue to 

deliberate the feasibility of a distribution and, if necessary, to develop a plan methodology, 

draft a proposed Plan of Distribution, and have a fund administrator appointed by the 

Commission. 
Accordingly, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Division’s 

request for an extension of time until March, 6, 2013, to submit a proposed Plan of 

Distribution is granted.

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Elizabeth M. Murphy

Secretary
§ 55.19 Written materials. ( a ) *Types of materials.* It is the obligation of the jurisdiction to decide what materials must be provided in a minority language. A jurisdiction required to provide minority language materials is only required to publish in the language of the applicable language minority group materials distributed to or provided for the use of the electorate generally. Such materials include, for example, ballots, sample ballots, informational materials, and petitions.
( b ) *Accuracy, completeness.* It is essential that material provided in the language of a language minority group be clear, complete and accurate. In examining whether a jurisdiction has achieved compliance with this requirement, the Attorney General will consider whether the jurisdiction has consulted with members of the applicable language minority group with respect to the translation of materials.
( c ) *Ballots.* The Attorney General will consider whether a jurisdiction provides the English and minority language versions on the same document. Lack of such bilingual preparation of ballots may give rise to the possibility, or to the appearance, that the secrecy of the ballot will be lost if a separate minority language ballot or voting machine is used.
( d ) *Voting machines.* Where voting machines that cannot mechanically accommodate a ballot in English and in the applicable minority language are used, the Attorney General will consider whether the jurisdiction provides sample ballots for use in the polling booths. Where such sample ballots are used the Attorney General will consider whether they contain a complete and accurate translation of the English ballots, and whether they contain or are accompanied by instructions in the minority language explaining the operation of the voting machine. The Attorney General will also consider whether the sample ballots are displayed so that they are clearly visible and at the same level as the machine ballot on the inside of the polling booth, whether the sample ballots are identical in layout to the machine ballots, and whether their size and typeface are the same as that appearing on the machine ballots. Where space limitations preclude affixing the translated sample ballots to the inside of polling booths, the Attorney General will consider whether language minority group voters are allowed to take the sample ballots into the voting booths.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 13, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 13, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15I0227. BRIAN SUMMERS, TRUSTEE OF THE SUMMERS FAMILY LIVING TRUST v. EDWARD L. WASDIN et al. .
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 14CV0245
!"#$%!

	

	

	


	
	
		


	

"&&#!'


		!




		
	"&&#!'




()


	











*+
	


	


		








	


	
	
			



	 !"	#$$%&'()
""*&"

#$$%&'()
	+

	"!	+
	+	"	!	


!		
	+,--$		


'+!+"
.##)/0
	++!+
12

,- 
	
*)-.)*/0)+123++04*-+52*--+

*+4,++0+,,6$%$*-*78*/,7-.*+


4,+),904'0220*/,1-30700*$&%!%!%& 

3		+	

"	"




)4 !1	"
"				

		
5#
/-,4/,
!+		"!)


#$)%	+	"
	
	4

4 
	+	
 +

+  !  
1++      
1	"  ++  	  


	2

'("	
44

'("""

* 6)7,$%

	
,$0$8

#4 				9+! +	+!

	1	

	:),;+
+	



 ! !

"+:	+



+
  ! 
+  "+;1  
 	







	

 

!"
#$
 

%$
&'  

(") *+" *

," --!

Case 16-12789-BFK Doc 39 Filed 10/31/17 Entered 10/31/17 11:14:50 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 5
	  
 ! 	+     )0   !  
    


"+!



+!4

1		+	

	""2

4  ! 	+
		"		

9+	+ +<

!4 +:;	+	:;
	+	+	

"
	+
<

4 		+

	+	"	++

1	!+<

+4 !	

1	"	

1	
	:)7;+
+
	"




2

4 +
<

4 (	 !=	1 	" 	 +


6<

4 (	!=	1	"		

1 	 + "		"  
  
  

+	!	+<

4 
! +		
	


	"0:+;
	



+1
 +	+"	



1
	+!<

	+


4 
	+
!+


4


 ! +		
	
	"0:+;


	!
	"+1
 +	+

		!		
	
	"0:+;	+

!"1
+
 +		"4


!
	!=	


	


	"	+"	
	"!
	
!	+4

    	"
        	            	      

	4

!4   	  
    +  1     "  	

			6	
+
	


 +4 	 	 
 +
 	 	 
 	 "

				+		 


+
	
 +
	!	
!
	"

	1  	  
  
  
    1   	  	+

	"4

4 3		+
		


		++! !
	


				4+	


	
		&	
!1=+

Case 16-12789-BFK Doc 39 Filed 10/31/17 Entered 10/31/17 11:14:50 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 5
	+		1
	+

	
"

					+1	 +4

+4         +
+        +  

	"  "	    	+   ! 	  	  	


			
	
	
	


	  	"
  	  
  	"  	

    	  

	
		
	+	+
	


  	  !	
  	  	      	    +	


 !	
!1    		



	+

	
+
4

4 		
+
1	"		"
>



)01!+
		+!"	

		+	"
	*




+!	4


4 	    	  
  "    
    &	  

		+ 	 		"!!
	+	

 ! "	+ 
 
      1  





	"+
4

?2



3??@>3*AB3C?

:




-+,,46-



Oct 31 2017

/s/ Brian F. Kenney

October 31, 2017

Case 16-12789-BFK Doc 39 Filed 10/31/17 Entered 10/31/17 11:14:50 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 5

2

2;);0).*
*-2

?4'
?9
4#)078

	+	>4B+	
?9
4%#)%$

B	>4	
?9
4%0#7-

>4*
?9
4-00$#

4'
*44

)-$7>+

#$$

>	+
.#0#0$

42:-$7;#/$&7#/$

(62:-$7;#/$&7#/-

	D14

	
		

	

	

 !"	#$$%&'()
""*&

"

#$$%&'()

		+"+2

;);*02))

	4*

	
!

8%)-'
#$$

	
.##)$)

	2

;);.,/*),/*

*4C	

)0

0$$4'	"	4

7$$

6	+
.##0)7

?>(? (?>.?

!
+ +!			1	+	" +!

)$&#
1E	
			+!		++!		+	

+	"4

2;);0).*
*-2

>4*
?9

4'
*44


	+ +
1	"2

*4C	

)0

0$$4'	"	4

7$$

6	+
.##0)7

Case 16-12789-BFK Doc 39 Filed 10/31/17 Entered 10/31/17 11:14:50 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 5
	4*

	
!

8%)-'
#$$

	
.##)$)

C		+C	

!

,--$		

'+!+"
.##)/0&08$#

Case 16-12789-BFK Doc 39 Filed 10/31/17 Entered 10/31/17 11:14:50 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 5
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 351 

Designating the week of September 29 through October 5, 2019, as ‘‘National 

Community Policing Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2019 

Mrs. SHAHEEN (for herself, Mr. CORNYN, and Ms. HASSAN) submitted the 

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week of September 29 through October 5, 

2019, as ‘‘National Community Policing Week’’. 

Whereas police officers are indispensable members of the 

community who put their lives on the line to protect others; 

Whereas promoting strong relationships founded in trust and 

mutual respect between law enforcement officers and the 

communities they serve helps ensure the safe and effective execution of the law; 

Whereas law enforcement officers and communities that work 

together to address public safety concerns can create lasting solutions to difficult challenges; 

Whereas a long-term commitment to community policing is 

necessary to eliminate the underlying causes of crime; 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 351 ATS 

Whereas the advancement of community policing should be 

supported to ensure that State and local law enforcement 

agencies have necessary resources; and 

Whereas community policing has been recognized as an important tool for improving the relationship between law 

enforcement officers and the communities they serve: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the week of September 29 

3 through October 5, 2019, as ‘‘National Community 

4 Policing Week’’; and 

5 (2) supports community policing and encour6 ages the people of the United States, law enforce7 ment agencies, and elected officials to identify ways 

8 in which communities can improve public safety, 

9 strengthen relationships, and build trust. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
#### § 710.407 [Reserved]
Case 15-33896-KRH Doc 4195 Filed 01/16/19 Entered 01/16/19 14:00:31 Desc MainDocument Page 1 of 21Case 15-33896-KRH Doc 4195 Filed 01/16/19 Entered 01/16/19 14:00:31 Desc MainDocument Page 2 of 21Case 15-33896-KRH Doc 4195 Filed 01/16/19 Entered 01/16/19 14:00:31 Desc MainDocument Page 3 of 21Case 15-33896-KRH Doc 4195 Filed 01/16/19 Entered 01/16/19 14:00:31 Desc MainDocument Page 4 of 21Case 15-33896-KRH Doc 4195 Filed 01/16/19 Entered 01/16/19 14:00:31 Desc MainDocument Page 5 of 21Case 15-33896-KRH Doc 4195 Filed 01/16/19 Entered 01/16/19 14:00:31 Desc MainDocument Page 6 of 21Case 15-33896-KRH Doc 4195 Filed 01/16/19 Entered 01/16/19 14:00:31 Desc MainDocument Page 7 of 21Case 15-33896-KRH Doc 4195 Filed 01/16/19 Entered 01/16/19 14:00:31 Desc MainDocument Page 8 of 21Case 15-33896-KRH Doc 4195 Filed 01/16/19 Entered 01/16/19 14:00:31 Desc MainDocument Page 9 of 21Case 15-33896-KRH Doc 4195 Filed 01/16/19 Entered 01/16/19 14:00:31 Desc MainDocument Page 10 of 21Case 15-33896-KRH Doc 4195 Filed 01/16/19 Entered 01/16/19 14:00:31 Desc MainDocument Page 11 of 21Case 15-33896-KRH Doc 4195 Filed 01/16/19 Entered 01/16/19 14:00:31 Desc MainDocument Page 12 of 21Case 15-33896-KRH Doc 4195 Filed 01/16/19 Entered 01/16/19 14:00:31 Desc MainDocument Page 13 of 21Case 15-33896-KRH Doc 4195 Filed 01/16/19 Entered 01/16/19 14:00:31 Desc MainDocument Page 14 of 21Case 15-33896-KRH Doc 4195 Filed 01/16/19 Entered 01/16/19 14:00:31 Desc MainDocument Page 15 of 21Case 15-33896-KRH Doc 4195 Filed 01/16/19 Entered 01/16/19 14:00:31 Desc MainDocument Page 16 of 21Case 15-33896-KRH Doc 4195 Filed 01/16/19 Entered 01/16/19 14:00:31 Desc MainDocument Page 17 of 21Case 15-33896-KRH Doc 4195 Filed 01/16/19 Entered 01/16/19 14:00:31 Desc MainDocument Page 18 of 21Case 15-33896-KRH Doc 4195 Filed 01/16/19 Entered 01/16/19 14:00:31 Desc MainDocument Page 19 of 21Case 15-33896-KRH Doc 4195 Filed 01/16/19 Entered 01/16/19 14:00:31 Desc MainDocument Page 20 of 21Case 15-33896-KRH Doc 4195 Filed 01/16/19 Entered 01/16/19 14:00:31 Desc MainDocument Page 21 of 21
May 28, 2015 

Mr. Michael A DeMita 

Tower Capital Advisors, LLC 

353 Tellico Road 

Canton, GA 30115 

Dear Mr. DeMita: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your April 22, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket 

(No. FAA-2015-1112), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For 

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure