alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                              ADZONE RESEARCH, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AdZone Research, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2004 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles
Cardona,  Chief Executive Officer,  Principal Accounting Officer and Director of
the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to AdZone Research,  Inc. and will be retained by AdZone Research, Inc.
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.

Date: February 14, 2005

                             /s/ Charles Cardona
                             --------------------------------
                             Name: Charles Cardona
                             Title: Chief Executive Officer
                             and Principal Accounting Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6017

TOMMY JEROME MCNEIL, Petitioner - Appellant, versus ERNEST SUTTON, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-863) Submitted: June 22, 2006 Decided: June 28, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tommy Jerome McNeil, Appellant Pro Se. Alvin William Keller, Jr., NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Tommy Jerome McNeil seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that McNeil has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM HAWAIIAN
ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES' CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF
DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000354707
<NAME> HAWAIIAN ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         199,906
<SECURITIES>                                 2,159,945
<RECEIVABLES>                                  162,233
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,628
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       3,195,273
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,129,078
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,291,026
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        977,529
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          100,000
<PREFERRED>                                    134,406
<COMMON>                                       665,335
<OTHER-SE>                                     182,251
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,291,026
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,523,290
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,289,419
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,356
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,546
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              72,631
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                149,884
<INCOME-TAX>                                    56,990
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             92,894
<DISCONTINUED>                                   3,953
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    96,847
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.00


</TABLE>
Podría haber estado expuesto al COVID-19 durante su viaje.

Esté atento a su salud por si presenta síntomas. Aunque no tenga síntomas, usted puede transmitir el virus. 

Proteja a los demás para que no se enfermen:

Para recibir más información después de viajar: https://espanol.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/travelers/

after-travel-precautions.html CS 315649-AQ July 14, 2020 9:41 AM

ALERTA DE SALUD GLOBAL: COVID-19 

Manténgase a 6 pies o 2 metros 

de distancia de los demás. Use una mascarilla.

Las actividades con contacto cercano lo ponen en riesgo de exposición al COVID-19.

Si cree que podría haber estado expuesto al viajar, sea especialmente cuidadoso por 14 días después del viaje:

ű Quédese en casa lo más posible. 

ű Evite estar cerca de otras personas, especialmente las que tengan un mayor riesgo de enfermarse 

gravemente con el COVID-19.

ű Considere hacerse la prueba del COVID-19.

Lávese las manos 

con frecuencia.
https://espanol.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/travelers/after-travel-precautions.html 

For information about COVID-19 and how to monitor your health after travel, 

open your cell phone camera and scan this code: 

Для получения информации о COVID-19 и о том, как 

контролировать состояние вашего здоровья после 

путешествия, включите камеру на вашем мобильном 

телефоне и отсканируйте этот код:

Pour obtenir des informations relatives à COVID-19 et à la manière de surveiller 

votre santé après un voyage, ouvrez la caméra de votre téléphone portable et 

scannez le code suivant :

코로나바이러스감염증-19(COVID-19) 및 여행 후 건강 상태를 모니터

링하는 방법에 대한 정보를 보려면, 휴대폰 카메라로 이 코드를 스캔

하십시오:

COVID-19 ,

, :

新型コロナウイルス感染症(COVID-19)

に関する情報、および旅行後の自身の健

康状態を観察する方法については、携帯

電話のカメラを起動して、このコードを

スキャンしてください:

Untuk mendapatkan maklumat mengenai COVID-19 dan cara 

mengawasi kesihatan anda selepas perjalanan, buka kamera telefon bimbit anda 

dan imbas kod ini:

Para obter informações sobre o COVID-19 e como monitorar 

sua saúde após a viagem, abra a câmera do seu celular e 

digitalize este código:

Para obtener información sobre el COVID-19 y cómo monitorear su salud 

después de un viaje, abra la cámara de su teléfono y escanee este código: 

有关COVID-19 的信息以及如何在旅行后监

测您的健康状况,请打开手机摄像头并扫描

此二维码:

Per informazioni sulla COVID-19 e su come monitorare 

la Sua salute dopo il viaggio, apra la fotocamera del Suo 

cellulare e scansioni questo codice:
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3502 — ACCOR/CLUB MEDITERRANEE)

(2004/C 280/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 19 October 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
From: Childress, Jerry [mailto:jchildress@mcgillairclean.com]

Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 11:54 AM

To: Holloway, Thomas C. (Tom)

Subject: RE: From McGill AirClean Web Site

Tom,

Sorry for the delay in responding.

We do not have any data on mercury emissions from brick kilns. All of our mercury removal experience

has been with municipal solid waste incinerators at waste

‐ to

‐ energy plants. I would have to look

through some test data to see how the levels compared with those in your study. In the past, when I

have had questions regarding removal efficiencies and parameters controlling those efficiencies, I have

contacted Norit, a PAC supplier, for assistance. That might be a good source of information for you

regarding this.

It should not be very difficult or expensive to add a PAC injection system to an existing brick APC system

that is already using a dry sorbent injection system for acid gas control. A simple bag dump system with

a blower could probably be used and would require very little additional space at a site. Weather

protection would be necessary, however. The slight increase in baghouse inlet particulate loading

shouldn't adversely affect the baghouse performance either.

Hope this helps some.

Gerald J. Childress, National Sales Manager McGill AirClean LLC

1777 Refugee Road

Columbus, Ohio 43207

‐ 2119

614/829

‐ 1350, Cell: 614/937

‐ 1816

Fax: 614/445

‐ 8759

‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message

‐‐‐‐‐

From: Tom Holloway [ mailto:tcholloway@rti.org ]

Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 10:52 AM

To: sales@mcgillairclean.com

Cc: UMC Marketing Services

Subject: From McGill AirClean Web Site

SUBJECT: Control of mercury at brick plants SENT BY: Tom Holloway, E

‐ MAIL: tcholloway@rti.org

Tom Holloway sends the following message:Hi, I work for RTI International, and we are providing technical support to the U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency to develop new regulations for the brick manufacturing industry. I have a couple of

questions I was hoping you could help me answer:

(1) Is it feasible to add activated carbon injection to an existing dry lime injection system for the purpose

of controlling mercury emissions?

(2) Is it feasible to control mercury emissions from brick kilns, given the following parameters?

‐ Range of mercury concentrations from 0.5 to 29 micrograms per dry standard cubic meter (average of

8 ug/dscm)

‐ Range of air flows from 15,200 to 108,500 actual cubic feet per minute (average of 38,200 acfm) and

9,400 to 62,700 dry standard cubic feet per minute (average of 23,600 dscfm)

‐ Range of temperatures from 114 to 400 degrees Fahrenheit (average of 321 degrees F)

Any assistance you can provide would be helpful. Thanks.

Tom Holloway

RTI International

Research Triangle Park, NC

Phone: 919

‐ 316

‐ 3733

Email: tcholloway@rti.org
### §460rrr–1. Establishment of Rio Grande Natural Area

#### (a) In general

There is established the Rio Grande Natural Area in the State of Colorado to conserve, restore, and protect the natural, historic, cultural, scientific, scenic, wildlife, and recreational resources of the Natural Area.

#### (b) Boundaries

The Natural Area shall include the Rio Grande River from the southern boundary of the Alamosa National Wildlife Refuge to the New Mexico State border, extending 1⁄4 mile on either side of the bank of the River.

#### (c) Map and legal description

#### (1) In general

As soon as practicable after October 12, 2006, the Secretary shall prepare a map and legal description of the Natural Area.

#### (2) Effect

The map and legal description of the Natural Area shall have the same force and effect as if included in this subchapter, except that the Secretary may correct any minor errors in the map and legal description.

#### (3) Public availability

The map and legal description of the Natural Area shall be available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of the Bureau of Land Management.

(Pub. L. 109–337, §3, Oct. 12, 2006, 120 Stat. 1777.)
### §459g–6. Preservation and designation as wilderness; review of area by Secretary; report to President

On or before January 1, 1978, the Secretary shall review the area within the seashore and shall report to the President, in accordance with section 1132(c) and (d) of this title, his recommendations as to the suitability or nonsuitability of any area within the seashore for preservation as wilderness, and any designation of any such areas as a wilderness shall be accomplished in accordance with section 1132(c) and (d) of this title.

(Pub. L. 89–366, §7, Mar. 10, 1966, 80 Stat. 35; Pub. L. 93–477, title IV, §406(4), Oct. 26, 1974, 88 Stat. 1449.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1974—Pub. L. 93–477 substituted provisions authorizing review of area and report to the President by the Secretary with regard to suitability of area for preservation as wilderness for provisions authorizing appropriations.
#### § 79.34 Proof of medical condition.

Proof of medical condition under this subpart will be made in the same manner and according to the same procedures and limitations as are set forth in § 79.16 and § 79.26.
### §460hh. Establishment; boundaries; publication in Federal Register

In order to provide for public outdoor recreation use and enjoyment of Arbuckle Reservoir and land adjacent thereto, and to provide for more efficient administration of other adjacent area containing scenic, scientific, natural, and historic values contributing to public enjoyment of the area and to designate the area in such manner as will constitute a fitting memorialization of the Chickasaw Indian Nation, there is hereby established the Chickasaw National Recreation Area (hereinafter referred to as the "recreation area") consisting of lands and interests in lands within the area as generally depicted on the drawing entitled "Boundary Map, Chickasaw National Recreation Area," numbered 107–20004–A and dated February 1974, which shall be on file and available for inspection in the offices of the National Park Service, Department of the Interior. The Secretary of the Interior (hereinafter referred to as the "Secretary") may from time to time revise the boundaries of the recreation area by publication of a map or other boundary description in the Federal Register, but the total acreage of the recreation area may not exceed ten thousand acres.

(Pub. L. 94–235, §1, Mar. 17, 1976, 90 Stat. 235.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Chickasaw National Recreation Area Land Exchange

Pub. L. 108–389, Oct. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 2239, known as the Chickasaw National Recreation Area Land Exchange Act of 2004, provided for the facilitation of a land exchange among the National Park Service, the Chickasaw Nation, and the City of Sulphur, Oklahoma, for the construction of the Chickasaw Nation Cultural Center within the Chickasaw National Recreation Area.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 20563 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee

v. MISAEL FIGUEROA OCAMPO, also known as Misael Figueroa O’Campo, also known as Misael Ocampo Figueroa,
Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:15 -CR- 128 -1

Before WIENER, CLEMENT, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Defendant-Appellant Misael Figuero a Ocampo appeals the 36 -month below- Guidelines sentence he received after he pleaded guilty to illegal reentry following an aggravated felony conviction, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). Ocampo asserts that the sentence exceeds the mean and median sentences for immigration offenses nationwide. He argues that the distric t

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 9, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-20563 Document: 00513791324 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/09/2016No. 15

- 20563

2 court should have considered the remoteness of his prior conviction for robbery causing injury, which was used to enhance his sentence, as well as his reason for illegally entering this country. Because Ocampo failed to object to the reasonableness of the sentence in the district court, his sentence is reviewed for plain error only. See United States v. Peltier , 505 F.3d 389, 391

- 92 (5th Cir. 2007) . Ocampo fails to rebut the presumption of correctness that we accord his below

- guidelines sentence

an d, therefore, fails to show plain error

. See Puckett v. United States , 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009) ; United States v. Simpson , 796 F.3d 548, 558 (5th Cir. 2015), cert. denied , 136 S. Ct. 920 (2016) ; United States v. Gomez

- Herrera , 523 F.3d 554, 565

- 66 (5th Ci r. 2008). AFFIRMED. Case: 15-20563 Document: 00513791324 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/09/2016
writ petitions challenging evidentiary rulings, as those rulings are

discretionary" and defendant may appeal if convicted). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

Hardesty

, • Parraguirre cc: Hon. Doug Smith, District Judge Clark County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 2

;.; EMI= SIMMININCEEMESSArerV,1; - :
Case 16-31273-KLP Doc 11 Filed 04/21/16 Entered 04/21/16 15:33:52 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 10
Case 16-31273-KLP Doc 11 Filed 04/21/16 Entered 04/21/16 15:33:52 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 10
Case 16-31273-KLP Doc 11 Filed 04/21/16 Entered 04/21/16 15:33:52 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 10
Case 16-31273-KLP Doc 11 Filed 04/21/16 Entered 04/21/16 15:33:52 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 10
Case 16-31273-KLP Doc 11 Filed 04/21/16 Entered 04/21/16 15:33:52 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 10
Case 16-31273-KLP Doc 11 Filed 04/21/16 Entered 04/21/16 15:33:52 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 10
Case 16-31273-KLP Doc 11 Filed 04/21/16 Entered 04/21/16 15:33:52 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 10
Case 16-31273-KLP Doc 11 Filed 04/21/16 Entered 04/21/16 15:33:52 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 10
Case 16-31273-KLP Doc 11 Filed 04/21/16 Entered 04/21/16 15:33:52 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 10
Case 16-31273-KLP Doc 11 Filed 04/21/16 Entered 04/21/16 15:33:52 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 10
# C_2011331EN.01001902.xml

| 12.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 September 2011 — Telefónica O2 Germany v OHIM — Loopia (LOOPIA)

(Case T-150/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark LOOPIA - Earlier Community word marks LOOP and LOOPY - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2011/C 331/35

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Telefónica O2 Germany GmbH & Co. OHG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: A. Fottner and M. Müller, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: R. Pethke, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Loopia AB (Västerås, Sweden) (represented by: P. Håkon-Schmidt and N. Ringen, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 January 2010 (Case R 1812/2008-1), concerning opposition proceedings between Telefónica O2 Germany GmbH & Co. OHG and Loopia AB.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 12 January 2010 (Case R 1812/2008-1); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 12 January 2010 (Case R 1812/2008-1);

| 2. | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay the costs of Telefónica O2 Germany GmbH & Co. OHG; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay the costs of Telefónica O2 Germany GmbH & Co. OHG;

| 3. | Orders OHIM to pay the costs necessarily incurred by Telefónica O2 Germany for the purposes of the proceedings before the First Board of Appeal of OHIM; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders OHIM to pay the costs necessarily incurred by Telefónica O2 Germany for the purposes of the proceedings before the First Board of Appeal of OHIM;

| 4. | Orders Loopia AB to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Loopia AB to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 148, 5.6.2010.

1

---
Fw: Revised Ch 7 - to mesh w/ preamble language 12/16/2011 04:53 PM

From: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Per Amanda's note below - we've accepted all your edits on Ch 7.

----- Forwarded by RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US on 12/16/2011 04:52 PM

----- From: Amanda CurryBrown/RTP/USEPA/US To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Bryan Hubbell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 12/16/2011 04:39 PM Subject: Re: Fw: Revised Ch 7 - to mesh w/ preamble language

We accepted her line edits on EO 12866 section, which we accepted. Those were the only new ones we saw.

Amanda Curry Brown OAQPS/HEID/AEG

919.541.3808 CurryBrown.Amanda@epa.gov
Record of Discussion 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA; GAMA, etc)? 

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED 

Boeing Tim Hendrix 9/25/2015 SB 

A4A Robert Ireland 1011 5/20 15 Proposed NPRM 

Other/ Additional Info1mation:
EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, Morteza Ejabat, Chief Executive Officer of
Zhone Technologies, Inc. (the Company), and Kirk Misaka, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that, to their knowledge:



|1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 8, 2009



|                                       |  |  |  |                                    
|-------------------------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------
|/s/ MORTEZA EJABAT                     |  |  |  | /s/ KIRK MISAKA                    
|Morteza Ejabat Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Kirk Misaka Chief Financial
Officer