alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Presidential Documents

15209 

Federal Register 

Vol. 76, No. 54 

Monday, March 21, 2011 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8637 of March 16, 2011 

150th Anniversary of the Unification of Italy, 2011 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

On March 17, Italy celebrates the 150th anniversary of its unification as 

a single state. On this day, we join with Italians everywhere to honor 

the courage, sacrifice, and vision of the patriots who gave birth to the 

Italian nation. At a time when the United States was fighting for the preservation of our own Union, Giuseppe Garibaldi’s campaign for the unification 

of Italy inspired many around the world in their own struggles, including 

the 39th New York Infantry, also known as ‘‘The Garibaldi Guard.’’ Today, 

the legacy of Garibaldi and all those who unified Italy lives on in the 

millions of American women and men of Italian descent who strengthen 

and enrich our Nation. 

Italy and the United States are bound by friendship and common dedication 

to civil liberties, democratic principles, and the universal human rights 

our countries both respect and uphold. As we mark this important milestone 

in Italian history, we also honor the joint efforts of Americans and Italians 

to foster freedom, democracy, and our shared values throughout the world. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim March 17, 2011, 

as a day to celebrate the 150th Anniversary of the Unification of Italy. 

I encourage all Americans to learn more about the history of Italian unification and to honor the enduring friendship between the people of Italy 

and the people of the United States. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this sixteenth day 

of March, in the year of our Lord two thousand eleven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-fifth. 

[FR Doc. 2011–6720 

Filed 3–18–11; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–W1–P 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with MISCELLANEOUSOB#1.EPS</GPH>
#### § 52.01 Civil proceedings: Special master, pretrial, trial, appeal.

( a ) Sections 636 (b) and (c) of title 28 of the United States Code govern pretrial and case-dispositive civil jurisdiction of magistrate judges, as well as service by magistrate judges as special masters.

( b ) It is the policy of the Department of Justice to encourage the use of magistrate judges, as set forth in this paragraph, to assist the district courts in resolving civil disputes. In conformity with this policy, the attorney for the government is encouraged to accede to a referral of an entire civil action for disposition by a magistrate judge, or to consent to designation of a magistrate judge as special master, if the attorney, with the concurrence of his or her supervisor, determines that such a referral or designation is in the interest of the United States. In making this determination, the attorney shall consider all relevant factors, including— ( 1 ) The complexity of the matter, including involvement of significant rights of large numbers of persons;
( 2 ) The relief sought;
( 3 ) The amount in controversy;
( 4 ) The novelty, importance, and nature of the issues raised;
( 5 ) The likelihood that referral to or designation of the magistrate judge will expedite resolution of the litigation;
( 6 ) The experience and qualifications of the magistrate judge; and
( 7 ) The possibility of the magistrate judge's actual or apparent bias or conflict of interest.

( c ) ( 1 ) In determining whether to consent to having an appeal taken to the district court rather than to the court of appeals, the attorney for the government should consider all relevant factors including— ( i ) The amount in controversy;
( ii ) The importance of the questions of law involved;
( iii ) The desirability of expeditious review of the magistrate judge's judgment.
( 2 ) In making a determination under paragraph (c)(1) of this section the attorney shall, except in those cases in which delegation authority has been exercised under 28 CFR 0.168, consult with the Assistant Attorney General having supervisory authority over the subject matter.

[Order No. 2012-96, 61 FR 8473, Mar. 5, 1996]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7233

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BILLY MACK BUFF,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Shelby. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CR-93-12-SH)

Submitted: October 29, 1996 Decided: January 13, 1997

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Billy Mack Buff, Appellant Pro Se. Jerry Wayne Miller, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion for relief from a fine imposed as part of his sentence

on his criminal conviction. The motion is properly construed as one

under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat.

1214. We have reviewed the record and find that Appellant's nonconstitutional claims which were not raised on direct appeal may not

be asserted on collateral review. Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465,

477 n.10 (1976). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. United States v. Buff, No. CR-93-12-SH

(W.D.N.C. July 10, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           7,524
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   92,262
<ALLOWANCES>                                       895
<INVENTORY>                                     46,608
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               178,434
<PP&E>                                          80,056
<DEPRECIATION>                                  46,349
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 270,975
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           99,133
<BONDS>                                         74,563
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,850
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,509
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   270,975
<SALES>                                        304,377
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               304,377
<CGS>                                          237,654
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  237,654
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,278
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,879
<INCOME-TAX>                                       776
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                846
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       846
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08


</TABLE>
**OFFICE OF.THE**  **ATTORNEY GENERAL**  **OF TEXAS**  

## Bonor8blO

-mod Borrir oounty Auditor Polk 

## countl .. Ll*lagston,

?*xsa **Your rw3.ur~t**  **for** an



### omulrrrl~rrr'

Co&t &.ly authorizer rrrl rt a nt

l d d oor

n o t

### nus a or

b o a - t 1s our oplalon, uader the rtrthortti~r 

### a. O+O, O-875 

### and O-1954, eoplea ot hioh 

### an 8 hrrowlthSor your ltioraablcm, that 

### suoh 

## l ppOi~ttSJlIt WOUl6 ;aot h ilb&. **COMMilTEE**
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [Docket# EPA-RO4-SFUND-2011-0278, FRL-9284-1]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice of settlement.

# SUMMARY:

Under Section 122(h)(1) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States Environmental Protection Agency has entered into a settlement for reimbursement of past response costs concerning the National Starch and Chemical Company Site located in Mobile, Mobile County, Alabama for publication.

# DATES:

The Agency will consider public comments on the settlement until April 18, 2011. The Agency will consider all comments received and may modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

# ADDRESSES:

Copies of the settlement are available from Ms. Paula V. Painter. Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-RO4-SFUND-2011-0278 or Site name National Starch and Chemical Company Superfund Site by one of the following methods:
      -  http://www.regulations.gov : Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.                    
      - http://www.epa.gov/​region4/​waste/​sf/​enforce.htm
      - E-mail: Painter.Paula@epa.gov 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Paula V. Painter at 404/562-8887.

Dated: March 4, 2011.

Anita L. Davis,

Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Superfund Division.

[FR Doc. 2011-6404 Filed 3-17-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
III 

★(Star Print)

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 263 

Honoring the 100th anniversary of The American Legion. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 25, 2019 

Mr. BRAUN (for himself, Mr. TESTER, Mr. YOUNG, Mr. JONES, Mr. BROWN, 

Mr. WICKER, Ms. WARREN, Ms. SINEMA, Ms. ERNST, Ms. MCSALLY, and 

Mr. INHOFE) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

JULY 31, 2019 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the 100th anniversary of The American Legion. 

Whereas The American Legion was founded on March 15, 

1919; 

Whereas Congress chartered The American Legion on September 16, 1919; 

Whereas, in 2019, The American Legion celebrates 100 years 

of serving veterans of the Armed Forces, their families, 

and communities; 

Whereas The American Legion is the largest wartime veterans service organization in the United States; 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 263 ATS1S 

Whereas The American Legion is headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana, and has approximately 2,000,000 members 

of the Armed Forces and veterans in its membership; 

Whereas The American Legion has counted among its members 10 Presidents of the United States; 

Whereas The American Legion has played a vital role in advocating for veterans’ affairs, including the passage of 

the Servicemen’s Readjustment Act of 1944 (commonly 

known as the ‘‘G.I. Bill’’) (58 Stat. 284, chapter 268) 

and the creation of the Department of Veterans Affairs; 

Whereas The American Legion has shown steadfast dedication to improving local communities, contributing approximately 3,700,000 volunteer community service hours 

annually and millions of dollars in college scholarships to 

students across the United States; and 

Whereas the mantra of The American Legion’s 100th anniversary, ‘‘Legacy and Vision’’, is an apt description of 

the contributions of The American Legion to life in the 

United States throughout 100 years of service and mutual helpfulness: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes that The American Legion has 

3 been a cornerstone of life in the United States from 

4 the local to the Federal level for 100 years and 

5 serves as a constant reminder of the inestimable 

6 contributions the members of the Armed Forces 

7 have made to enrich life in the United States during 

8 and after their service; 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 263 ATS1S 

1 (2) honors the vital role The American Legion 

2 has played in the United States throughout 100 

3 years of service; 

4 (3) remembers the deep and lasting mark Le5 gionnaires have made throughout 100 years of his6 tory of the United States; and 

7 (4) celebrates the continued position of The 

8 American Legion as an inextinguishable beacon of 

9 community, responsibility, honor, and service. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          18,545
<SECURITIES>                                   190,107
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,117,254
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (24,299)
<INVENTORY>                                     57,546
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       8,812,394
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,641,258)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,136,707
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      6,602,220
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,083
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,672,908
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,136,707
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,715,666
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,794,090
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                19,824
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             341,359
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                560,393
<INCOME-TAX>                                   224,392
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            336,001
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   336,001
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.10


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 28, 2013

t1021 

# Order

Clerk October 28, 2013

147456

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN

, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147456

COA: 301620

Oakland CC: 2010

- 231058

- FC

SAMANTHA LORRAINE LOMASNEY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 13, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

WENDELL THOMPSON

NO. 2021 KW 1525

FEBRUARY 25, 2022

In Re: Wendell Thompson, applying for supervisory writs, 22nd

Judicial District Court, Parish of Washington, No. 02- 

CR8- 86387. 

BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C. J., PENZATO AND HESTER, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED AS MOOT. The records of the Washington Parish

Clerk of Court' s Office reflect that the district court acted on

relator' s motion for production of documents on December 10, 

2021. 

VGW

AHP

CHH

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY LERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
#### §§ 71.48-71.50 [Reserved]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2282

GEORGE CHRISTIAN, SR.; LAURA CHRISTIAN,

Petitioners - Appellants,

versus

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 86-23453)

Submitted: November 19, 1996 Decided: December 2, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Christian, Sr., Laura Christian, Appellants Pro Se. Gary R.

Allen, Richard Farber, Andrea R. Tebbets, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT

OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

George Christian, Sr., and Laura Christian appeal from the tax

court's order entered November 28, 1994. The Christians' notice of

appeal, filed on June 15, 1995, is untimely. Section 7483 of the

Internal Revenue Code provides that "[r]eview of a decision of the

tax court shall be obtained by filing a notice of appeal with the

Clerk of the Tax Court within 90 days after the decision of the Tax

Court is entered." 26 U.S.C. § 7483 (1994); see also Fed. R. App.

P. 13(a). The timely filing of a notice of appeal is jurisdictional. Davies v. Commissioner, 715 F.2d 435, 436 (9th Cir. 1983);

Robert Louis Stevenson Apartments, Inc. v. Commissioner, 337 F.2d

681 (8th Cir. 1964); Vibro Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner, 312 F.2d 253,

254 (2d Cir. 1963). The Christians' motions to vacate did not extend the time to appeal the tax court's decision. Although a timely

motion to vacate or revise a decision under Rule 13(a) tolls the

time period for noting an appeal, successive post-decision motions

may not be tacked together to perpetuate the prescribed time for

appeal. Okon v. Commissioner, 26 F.3d 1025, 1026-27 (10th Cir.),

cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 115 S. Ct. 583 (1994); see Fed. R. App.

P. 13(a); Tax Ct. R. 162. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for

lack of jurisdiction. In light of this disposition, the Christians'

"Motion for Summary Judgment Review of Memorandum Sur order dated

2/17/88" is hereby denied. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
3

materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §470hh. Confidentiality of information concerning nature and location of archaeological resources

#### (a) Disclosure of information

Information concerning the nature and location of any archaeological resource for which the excavation or removal requires a permit or other permission under this chapter or under any other provision of Federal law may not be made available to the public under subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5 or under any other provision of law unless the Federal land manager concerned determines that such disclosure would—

(1) further the purposes of this chapter or chapter 3125 of title 54, and

(2) not create a risk of harm to such resources or to the site at which such resources are located.

#### (b) Request for disclosure by Governors

Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a), upon the written request of the Governor of any State, which request shall state—

(1) the specific site or area for which information is sought,

(2) the purpose for which such information is sought,

(3) a commitment by the Governor to adequately protect the confidentiality of such information to protect the resource from commercial exploitation,

the Federal land manager concerned shall provide to the Governor information concerning the nature and location of archaeological resources within the State of the requesting Governor.

(Pub. L. 96–95, §9, Oct. 31, 1979, 93 Stat. 727; Pub. L. 113–287, §5(d)(8), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3265.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 113–287, which directed substitution of "chapter 3125 of title 54" for "the Act of June 27, 1960 (16 U.S.C. 469–469c)" in subsec. (a)(2), was executed by making the substitution in subsec. (a)(1), to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
### §460aa–6. State civil and criminal jurisdiction

Nothing in this subchapter shall diminish, enlarge, or modify any right of the State of Idaho, or any political subdivision thereof, to exercise civil and criminal jurisdiction within the recreation area or of rights to tax persons, corporations, franchises, or property, including mineral or other interests, in or on lands or waters within the recreation area.

(Pub. L. 92–400, §7, Aug. 22, 1972, 86 Stat. 614.)