alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

September 20, 2021

In the Matter of

Sports Field Holdings, Inc.,

File No. 500-1

ORDER OF SUSPENSION

OF TRADING

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Sports Field Holdings, Inc.

(“SFHI1”) (CIK No. 1539551), a defaulted Nevada corporation located in St. Charles, Ilinois

with a class of securities registered with the Commission pursuant to Securities Exchange Act of 

1934 ("Exchange Act") Section 12(g) because it is delinquent in its periodic filings with the 

Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-Q for the period 

ended September 30, 2019. On July 20, 2021, the Commission’s Division of Corporation 

Finance (“Corporation Finance”) sent a delinquency letter to SFHI requesting compliance with 

its periodic filing requirements, which was delivered. As of September 9, 2021, the common 

stock of SFHI was quoted on OTC Link operated by OTC Markets Group Inc. (formerly “Pink 

Sheets”) (“OTC Link”), had five market makers, and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception 

of Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11(f)(3). 

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors 

require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company. Therefore, it is 

ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the 

 

1 The short form of each issuer’s name is also its stock symbol.
2

securities of the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on 

September 21, 2021, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on October 4, 2021.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary
<PAGE>


                        HAWAIIAN AIRLINES, INC.

                      AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO WARRANT
                    FOR THE PURCHASE OF SHARES OF
                            COMMON STOCK

     The Warrant evidenced by Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. Warrant Certificate No. 12
is hereby amended by deleting Section 1(d) of such Warrant Certificate in its
entirety and replacing it with the following:

     "(d)"  This Warrant may not be exercised until American Airlines, Inc.
     ("American"), a wholly owned subsidiary of AMR, and Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.
     ("Hawaiian") enter into a binding code sharing arrangement permitting
     Hawaiian to add American's designator code to Hawaiian's interisland
     flights (other than the Honolulu to Maui segment) (a "Code Share") and all
     conditions to effectiveness of the Code Share have been satisfied.  This
     Warrant may not be exercised if American and Hawaiian fail, after good
     faith negotiations, to enter into and execute a Code Share prior to January
     1, 1997 and all conditions to effectiveness of the Code Share have not been
     satisfied prior to February 1, 1997."

     IN WITNESS THEREOF, Hawaiian Airlines, Inc., as issuer or the Warrant, and
AMR Corporation, as the holder of the Warrant, have caused this Amendment No. 1
to be duly executed as of December 17, 1996.


                                   HAWAIIAN AIRLINES, INC.


                                   By:______________________________
                                        Name:
                                        Title:
ATTEST:


______________________________
Name:
Title:

                                   AMR CORPORATION


                                   By:______________________________
                                        Name:
                                        Title:
ATTEST:


______________________________
Name:
Title:
#### § 42.732 Prohibition against intimidation.

A recipient may not intimidate or retaliate against any person who attempts to assert a right secured by the Act and this suppart or who cooperates in any mediation, investigation, hearing, or other aspect of the Department's compliance procedure.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MAHER OMAR KUTKUT, AKA Maher

Omar Abdel Majid Kutkut, AKA Maher

Omar Abdelmajid Kutkut,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-70376

Agency No. A095-656-685

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted December 2, 2013

Pasadena, California

Before: SCHROEDER, CLIFTON, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Maher Omar Kutkut petitions for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s denial of his applications for

asylum, withholding, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).

FILED

DEC 18 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The asylum application was denied as untimely because it was filed fifteen

months after the expiration of Petitioner’s legal status. Moreover, it was filed after

removal proceedings had been instituted. Petitioner contends that the delay should

nevertheless be considered reasonable, likening his situation to the situation in

Taslimi v. Holder, 590 F.3d 981 (9th Cir. 2010), where we held a delay of seven

months was reasonable in light of petitioner’s uncertainties about the permanence

of her religious conversion. Petitioner’s delay was twice as long, however, and

prompted by no comparable change in the circumstances of his life affecting his

eligibility for relief.

Given the speculative nature of his concerns about how he would be treated

on his return to Jordan, the evidence does not compel a conclusion that he had a

well-founded fear of persecution. See Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1018 (9th

Cir. 2003). The denial of withholding and relief under CAT must be upheld.

 In light of our disposition of the case in a nonprecedential memorandum,

Petitioner’s pending motion is denied as moot.

 Petition DENIED.

2
### §4910. Prohibited acts

#### (a) Prohibitions

#### (1) In general

Subject to paragraph (2), it is unlawful for any person to—

(A) import any exotic bird in violation of any prohibition, suspension, or quota on importation under section 4904 or 4907 of this title;

(B) import an exotic bird of a species that pursuant to section 4905(a)(2)(B) of this title is included in a list under section 4905 of this title, if the bird was not captive bred at a qualifying facility; or

(C) violate any regulation promulgated by the Secretary pursuant to authority provided by this chapter.

#### (2) Limitation

Paragraph (1)(A) and (B) does not apply to importations made incident to the transit of exotic birds through the United States to foreign countries if the applicable requirements of the Convention have been satisfied with respect to the trade in those exotic birds.

#### (b) Burden of proof for exemptions

Any person claiming the benefit of any exemption or permit under this chapter shall have the burden of proving that the exemption or permit is applicable or has been granted, and was valid and in force at the time of the alleged violation.

(Pub. L. 102–440, title I, §111, Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2230.)
### §3773. Partners for Fish and Wildlife Program

The Secretary shall carry out the Partners for Fish and Wildlife Program within the United States Fish and Wildlife Service to provide—

(1) technical and financial assistance to private landowners for the conduct of voluntary projects to benefit Federal trust species by promoting habitat improvement, habitat restoration, habitat enhancement, and habitat establishment; and

(2) technical assistance to other public and private entities regarding fish and wildlife habitat restoration on private land.

(Pub. L. 109–294, §4, Oct. 3, 2006, 120 Stat. 1354.)
### §460ccc–6. Cooperative agreements

In order to encourage unified and cost-effective management and interpretation of natural and cultural resources in the conservation area, the Secretary is authorized and encouraged to enter into cooperative agreements with other Federal, State, and local agencies and nonprofit entities providing for the management and interpretation of natural and cultural resources in the conservation area.

(Pub. L. 101–621, §8, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3345.)
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3523 — ALLIANZ/FOUR SEASONS)

(2004/C 209/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 9 August 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with thequarterly report of The SCO Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q, for theperiod ended July 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Darl C. McBride, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| By:    | /s/ Darl C. McBride                    |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Darl C. McBride                        |
|   | President and Chief  Executive Officer |
|   |                                   |
|   |                                   |
| Date:  | September 12, 2003                |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or any other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
### §460z–4. Transfer of Federal property

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any Federal property located within the boundaries of the recreation area is hereby transferred without consideration to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary for use by him in implementing the purposes of this subchapter, but lands presently administered by the United States Coast Guard or the United States Corps of Engineers may continue to be used by such agencies to the extent required.

(Pub. L. 92–260, §5, Mar. 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 99.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of authorities, functions, personnel, and assets of the Coast Guard, including the authorities and functions of the Secretary of Transportation relating thereto, to the Department of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 468(b), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.
### §460ll–2. Rattlesnake National Recreation Area

An area of land as generally depicted as the "Rattlesnake National Recreation Area" on a map entitled "Rattlesnake National Recreation area and Wilderness—Proposed", and dated October 1, 1980, is hereby established as the Rattlesnake National Recreation Area.

(Pub. L. 96–476, §3, Oct. 19, 1980, 94 Stat. 2272.)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6017

TOMMY JEROME MCNEIL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ERNEST SUTTON,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief

District Judge. (CA-04-863)

Submitted: June 22, 2006 Decided: June 28, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tommy Jerome McNeil, Appellant Pro Se. Alvin William Keller, Jr.,

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Tommy Jerome McNeil seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that McNeil has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
-----"Andrew Shawl" <andrew.shaw l@blengland.com> wrote: -----

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA From: "Andrew Shawl" <and rew.shawl@blen gland.com> Date: 07/09/2010 06:07PM cc: <andrew.shawl@blenglan d.com>, "'Keyser, Bob'" <b ob.keyser@blen gland.com> Subject: Questionnaire Extension Request

Ms. Alicea,

Please accept the attachment to this e-mail as a request for an extension to respond to the EPA Questionnaire. A hard copy will follow in the US mail. Thank you, in advance, fo r your consideration.



### Andrew Shawl, PE

B. L. England Station

900 North Shore Road
Beesley's Point, NJ 08223
phone 609 390 5113

fax 609 390 5149

cell 609 377 3269
andrew.shawl@blengland.com 

### Pa g e 1 of 1

8/26/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C3C0761DO

...
### §460vv–17. Permits

The Secretary shall cooperate with other Federal agencies, with State and local public agencies and bodies, and with private individuals and organizations in the issuance of permits for facilities, services, and recreational facilities in the Winding Stair Mountain National Recreation and Wilderness Area. In issuing such permits, the Secretary is authorized and encouraged to consider local nonprofit entities and the private sector.

(Pub. L. 100–499, §19, Oct. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 2499.)
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Stone  Field  Management
Company,  on Form 10- QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the
undersigned, B. Stephen Bailey, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 32.2****SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**          In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Surgical Partners International, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Mark A. Kopser, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        /s/ Mark A. Kopser   Mark A. Kopser   Chief Financial Officer    November 1, 2006A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Black Kettle

Cibola National Forest

Black Kettle and McClellan Creek

National Grasslands

Lake Marvin

McClellan Creek NG

Cibola National Forest

This map was produced on 9/8/2006

by rarlowe

1:24,000

1:24,000

0 0.5 1 2

Miles

0 0.5 1 2

Miles

2266

2477

2477

£¤283

£¤283

!(30

!(30

!(30

!(33

!(33

!(33

!(47

!(47

!(47

!(47

§ ̈¦40

All Inventoried Roads

0 1.25 2.5 5 7.5 10

Miles

NOTE:This map depicts the

Preliminary Roads Inventory

which will be evaluated and

updated through the

Travel Management Process 1:85,000

¦ Forest Service, Closed Road

Forest Service, Open Road

Forest Service, Seasonally Closed

Other Public Road

(Federal, State, County, or Local)

Private Road

Undetermined Road

99
Cibola National Forest

Kiowa/Rita Blanca National Grasslands

East Kiowa 

and Rita Blanca

Cibola National Forest

This map was produced on 9/7/2006

by rarlowe

¤£56 ¤£46

¤£ ¤£56 ¤£46

46

¤£78

¤£78

¤£78

¤£56

¬«4 20

¬«4 60

¬«37

A-088

¬«4 60

A-081

A-078

A-095 D0303

A-091

A-055

A-077

A-075

Booster Station Rd

A-021

A-029

C-082

C-081

C-079

C-077

C-074

¬«4 20

¬«2 69

¬«2 69

EW-35

EW-35

EW-33

EW-33

EW-34

EW-31

EW-31

NS-18

NS-19

NS-13

¤£538

¤£538

¤£538

¬«2 69

¬«2 69

¬«8 70

¬«8 70

NS-20

NS-27

NS-37

EW-33

¤£728

¤£728

All Inventoried Roads

0 2.5 5 10 15 20

Miles

NOTE:This map depicts the

Preliminary Roads Inventory

which will be evaluated and

updated through the

Travel Management Process 1:85,000

¦ Forest Service, Closed Road

Forest Service, Open Road

Forest Service, Seasonally Closed

Other Public Road

(Federal, State, County, or Local)

Private Road

Undetermined Road

100
Cibola National Forest

Kiowa/Rita Blanca

National Grasslands

Mills Unit

!(39

!(1 02

!(39

!(39

!(1 02

!(1 02

!(1 02

Emplazado Rd

Case Rd

Mills Canyon Rd Shaw Ranch Rd

Fluhman RdBrockman Rd

Freeman Rd

Shaw Ranch Rd

Sugarloaf Rd

Craft Ranch Rd Craft Ranch Rd

Sugarloaf Rd

Cibola National Forest

This map was produced on 9/7/2006

by rarlowe

Forest Service, Closed Road

Forest Service, Open Road

Forest Service, Seasonally Closed

Other Public Road

(Federal, State, County, or Local)

Private Road

Undetermined Road

All Inventoried Roads

0 1.25 2.5 5 7.5 10

Miles

1:85,000

¦ NOTE:This map depicts the

Preliminary Roads Inventory

which will be evaluated and

updated through the

Travel Management Process

101
#### § 490.203 Applicability.

The performance measures are applicable to all public roads covered by the HSIP carried out under 23 U.S.C. 130 and 148.
### §410qq–4. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 100–571, §5, Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2883.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          16,752
<SECURITIES>                                   171,714
<RECEIVABLES>                                  909,480
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (16,040)
<INVENTORY>                                     39,502
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       7,989,524
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,475,683)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,872,558
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      5,759,783
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,083
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,392,740
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,872,558
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,238,333
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,461,616
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,051
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             306,274
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                465,392
<INCOME-TAX>                                   188,383
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            277,009
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   277,009
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.56<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.55
<FN>
<F1>AMOUNT REPORTED IS EPS-BASIC.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 97.15 Employee uniforms and identification. ( a ) *Employee uniforms.* Uniforms used by private prisoner transport companies must meet the following requirements: ( 1 ) Uniforms must be readily distinguishable in style and color from official uniforms worn by United States Department of Justice employees who transport violent offenders;
( 2 ) Uniforms must prominently feature a badge or insignia that identifies the employee as a prisoner transportation employee; and
( 3 ) Uniforms must be worn at all times while the employee is engaged in the transportation of violent prisoners.
( b ) *Employee identification.* Identification utilized by private prisoner transport companies must meet the following requirements: ( 1 ) The identification credentials must clearly identify the employee as a transportation employee. The credentials must have a photograph of the employee that is at least one inch square, a printed personal description of the employee including the employee's name, the signature of the employee, and date of issuance; and
( 2 ) The employee must display proper identification credentials on his or her uniform and ensure that the identification is visible at all times during the transportation of violent prisoners.