alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2
Certification  Pursuant  To 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  As Adopted  Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Liska Biometry,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Manoj  Hippola,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  to my best
knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

By:   /s/ Manoj Hippola
   ------------------------
      Manoj Hippola
      CFO

Dated:  May 13, 2004


                                       43
§ 79.57 Proof of chronic renal disease. ( a ) In determining whether a claimant developed chronic renal disease following pertinent employment as a miller, the Assistant Director shall resolve all reasonable doubt in favor of the claimant. A conclusion that a claimant developed chronic renal disease must be supported by medical documentation.
( b ) A claimant or beneficiary may submit any of the following forms of medical documentation in support of a claim that the claimant contracted chronic renal disease. ( 1 ) Pathology report of tissue biopsy;
( 2 ) If laboratory or radiographic tests exist: ( i ) Abnormal plasma creatinine values; and
( ii ) Abnormal glomerular filtration rate (by either measured creatinine or iothalamate clearance or calculated by MDRD equation); and
( iii ) Renal tubular dysfunction as evidenced by: ( A ) Glycosuria in the absence of diabetes mellitus;
( B ) Proteinuria less than one gram daily without other known etiology; or
( C ) Hyperphosphaturia, aminoaciduria, B-2 microglobinuria or alkaline phosphaturia or other marker of proximal tubular injury; or
( iv ) Radiographic evidence of chronic renal disease;
( 3 ) Autopsy report;
( 4 ) Physician summary report;
( 5 ) Hospital discharge summary report;
( 6 ) Hospital admitting report; or
( 7 ) Death certificate, provided that it is signed by a physician at the time of death.
§ 660.109 Program development. ( a ) The FHWA will arrange and conduct a conference with the FS and the SHA to jointly select the projects which will be included in the programs for the current fiscal year and at least the next 4 years. Projects included in each year's program will be selected considering the following criteria: ( 1 ) The development, utilization, protection, and administration of the NFS and its resources;
( 2 ) The enhancement of economic development at the local, regional, and national level, including tourism and recreational travel;
( 3 ) The continuity of the transportation network serving the NFS and its dependent communities;
( 4 ) The mobility of the users of the transportation network and the goods and services provided;
( 5 ) The improvement of the transportation network for economy of operation and maintenance and the safety of its users;
( 6 ) The protection and enhancement of the rural environment associated with the NFS and its resources; and
( 7 ) The results for FHs from the pavement, bridge, and safety management systems.
( b ) The recommended program will be prepared and approved by the FHWA with concurrence by the FS and the SHA. Following approval, the SHA shall advise any other cooperators in the State of the projects included in the final program and shall include the approved program in the State's process for development of the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program. For projects located in metropolitan areas, the FHWA and the SHA will work with the MPO to incorporate the approved program into the MPO's Transportation Improvement Program.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Robert Schnabel, Appellant, against John J. McCloskey, Jr., as Sheriff of the City of New York, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
### §6406. Block grants

#### (a) In general

In each fiscal year beginning in fiscal year 2023 and subject to the availability of appropriations, the Administrator shall provide block grants of financial assistance of not less than $500,000 to each covered State to support management and restoration activities and further the implementation of coral reef action plans in effect under section 6404 of this title by covered States and non-Federal coral reef stewardship partnerships in accordance with this section. The Administrator shall review each covered State's application for block grant funding to ensure that applications are consistent with applicable action plans and the National Coral Reef Resilience Strategy.

#### (b) Responsibilities of the Administrator

The Administrator is responsible for—

(1) providing guidance on the proper documentation of expenditures authorized under this chapter;

(2) issuing annual solicitations to covered States for awards under this section; and

(3) determining the appropriate allocation of additional amounts among covered States in accordance with this section.

#### (c) Responsibilities of covered States

Each covered State is responsible for documenting and reporting—

(1) such State's use of Federal funds received under this chapter; and

(2) such expenditures of non-Federal funds made in furtherance of coral reef management and restoration as the Administrator determines appropriate.

#### (d) Cooperative agreements

Subject to the availability of appropriations, the Administrator may seek to enter into a cooperative agreement with a covered State to fund coral reef conservation and restoration activities in waters managed under the jurisdiction of such covered State that are consistent with the National Coral Reef Resilience Strategy and any applicable action plan under section 6404 of this title.

#### (e) All Islands Committee

The Administrator may enter into a cooperative agreement with the All Islands Committee of the Task Force to provide support for its activities.

(Pub. L. 106–562, title II, §207, as added Pub. L. 117–263, div. J, title C, §10001(a), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3938.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsecs. (b)(1) and (c)(1), was in the original "this Act" which was translated as reading "this title", meaning title II of Pub. L. 106–562, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 6406, Pub. L. 106–562, title II, §207, Dec. 23, 2000, 114 Stat. 2804, related to national program to conserve coral reefs and coral reef ecosystems, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 117–263, div. J, title C, §10001(a), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3931.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 91188 / February 23, 2021

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension, 

pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, of trading of the 

securities of Renuen Corp. (“RENU” or “the Company”) (CIK No. 0001176231), an 

inactive Florida corporation of Singer Island, Florida at 9:30 a.m. EST on February 24, 

2021, and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EST on March 9, 2021:

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of RENU because of 

questions regarding the accuracy and adequacy of information about the Company in the 

marketplace and recent, unusual and unexplained trading activity affecting the market for 

its securities in light of a lack of recent public disclosures, and the fact that the Company 

is no longer operating. 

The Commission cautions brokers, dealers, shareholders, and prospective purchasers that 

they should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently 

available information and any information subsequently issued by the Company. 

Further, brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Rule 15c2-11

under the Exchange Act, at the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may 

be entered unless and until they have strictly complied with all of the provisions of the 

rule. If any broker or dealer has any questions as to whether or not it has complied with 

the rule, it should not enter any quotation but immediately contact the staff in the 

Division of Trading and Markets, Office of Interpretation and Guidance, at (202) 551-

5777. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is required by Rule 15c2-11, it 

should refrain from entering quotations relating to RENU’s securities until such time as it 

has familiarized itself with the rule and is certain that all of its provisions have been met. 

If any broker or dealer enters any quotation that is in violation of the rule, the 

Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement action.

If any broker, dealer or other person has any information that may relate to this matter,

they should immediately contact Elisha L. Frank, Assistant Regional Director, or Jason 

R. Berkowitz, Assistant Regional Director, Miami Regional Office of the Securities and 

Exchange Commission at (305) 982-6300, or Michael D. Paley, Assistant Regional 

Director, New York Regional Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission at 

(212) 336-1100.
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionsho uld not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except under the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 20113 C onfer enc e Cal endar
UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee
v. PE D R O G A B R I E L C O LL A ZO

- A LIC E A , al so k n ow n as Frank, al so know n as B on i faci o G om ez, D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e S ou t h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 4: 07- C R
- 157- 1
B e fo r e K IN G , J O L L Y , a n d S O U T H W IC K , C ir c u it J u d g e s . P E R C U R I A M: * T h e att orney ap poi n t ed to represent P edro G abri e l C o ll a z o -A li ce a (C o ll a z o) has m o ve d f

o rl e av e t o w i t hdr aw and has f i l e d a b r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A n d ers v . C a lif o rn ia , 3 86 U
. S. 7 38 ( 19 67 )
. Col l az o ha s fi l ed a r e s po ns e . Our i n dep en den trevi ew of t h e r ecord, coun sel ’ s bri ef, an d C ol l azo ’ s r espon se di s c l o s e s no no nf

r i vo l o us i s s ue f

o r ap pe al
. Acc o r di ngl y, c o uns e l ’ s m o t i o n for United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December

15, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 09- 20113

2 l eave t o w i t h draw i s G R A N T E D , coun seli s excused f rom f u rt h er r espon sibi l i t i es h e r e in , a n d th e A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D
. S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2.
### §4214. Advisory group

#### (a) In general

To assist in carrying out this chapter, the Secretary may convene an advisory group consisting of individuals representing public and private organizations actively involved in the conservation of African elephants.

#### (b) Public participation

#### (1) Meetings

The Advisory Group 1 shall—

(A) ensure that each meeting of the advisory group is open to the public; and

(B) provide, at each meeting, an opportunity for interested persons to present oral or written statements concerning items on the agenda.

#### (2) Notice

The Secretary shall provide to the public timely notice of each meeting of the advisory group.

#### (3) Minutes

Minutes of each meeting of the advisory group shall be kept by the Secretary and shall be made available to the public.

#### (c) Exemption from chapter 10 of title 5

Chapter 10 of title 5 shall not apply to the advisory group.

(Pub. L. 100–478, title II, §2104, as added Pub. L. 107–111, §4, Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 2095; amended Pub. L. 107–141, §5(b)(2)(A), Feb. 12, 2002, 116 Stat. 14; Pub. L. 117–286, §4(a)(120), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4318.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 117–286 substituted "chapter 10 of title 5" for "Federal Advisory Committee Act" in heading and "Chapter 10 of title 5" for "The Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.)" in text.

2002—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107–141 made technical amendment to reference in original act which appears in text as reference to this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2002 Amendment

Pub. L. 107–141, §5(b)(2), Feb. 12, 2002, 116 Stat. 14, provided that the amendment by section 5(b)(2) of Pub. L. 107–141 is effective on the day after Jan. 8, 2002.

1 So in original. Probably should not be capitalized.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
 Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund XLVI
Project No. 13734-000.FFP Missouri 17, LLC
Project No. 13754-000.Solia 3 Hydroelectric, LLC
Project No. 13765-000.Three Rivers Hydro LLC
Project No. 13783-000.
 The Commission has received four preliminary permit applications deemed filed on May 18, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.,[1]
                    
                     for proposed projects to be located at the Army Corps of Engineers' Hildebrand Lock and Dam on the Monongahela River, in Monongahela County, West Virginia. The applications were filed by Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund XLVI for Project No. 13734, FFP Missouri 17, LLC, for Project No. 13754, Solia 3 Hydroelectric, LLC, for Project No. 13765, and Three Rivers Hydro LLC for Project No. 13783.[2] On March 24, 2011, at 10 a.m. (eastern time), the Secretary of the Commission, or her designee, will conduct a random drawing to determine the filing priority of the applicants identified in this notice. The Commission will select among competing permit applications as provided in section 4.37 of its regulations.[3]
                    
                     The priority established by this drawing will be used to determine which applicant, among those with identical filing times, will be considered to have the first-filed application. The drawing is open to the public and will be held in room 2C, the Commission Meeting Room, located at 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426. A subsequent notice will be issued by the Secretary announcing the results of the drawing. Dated: March 15, 2011. Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., Deputy Secretary.


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         Under the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, any document received after regular business hours is considered filed at 8:30 a.m. on the next regular business day. 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(2) (2010). Back to Citation
 2.
    
                         Hildebrand Hydro, LLC, also filed a permit application to study the same site for Project No. 13790, which is deemed filed on May 19, 2010. Back to Citation
 3.
    
                         18 CFR 4.37 (2010). Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2011-6775 Filed 3-22-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 70015 / July 22, 2013

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-14950

In the Matter of

CENTAUR MANAGEMENT 

CO. LLC

 

Respondent.

ORDER APPROVING 

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

On July 17, 2012, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the 

“Commission”) entered an Order Instituting Administrative and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings

Pursuant to Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Making 

Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order against Centaur 

Management Co. LLC (“Order”) (Advisers Act Rel. No. 3432 (July 17, 2012)). The Order 

created a Fair Fund, pursuant to Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended,

and is comprised of $364,322 (“Fair Fund”) in disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and a civil 

money penalty paid by Centaur Management Co. LLC.

On May 17, 2013, the Commission issued a Notice of Proposed Plan of Distribution and 

Opportunity for Comment (the “Notice”) pursuant to Rule 1103 of the Commission’s Rules on 

Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1103 (Exchange Act Rel. No. 69604 (May 

17, 2013)). The Notice advised interested parties that they could obtain a copy of the proposed plan 
2

of distribution (the “Plan”) by printing a copy from the Commission’s public website or by 

submitting a written request to Anik A. Shah, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, 

100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549-5631. 

The Notice also advised that all persons desiring to comment on the Plan could submit their 

comments, in writing, no later than thirty (30) days from the date of the Notice: a) to the Office of 

the Secretary, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, 

DC 20549-1090; b) by using the Commission’s Internet comment form; or c) by sending an e-mail 

to rule-comments@sec.gov. The Commission received no comments on the Plan. 

The Plan provides for a distribution of the Fair Fund comprised of $172,438 in

disgorgement, $41,884 in prejudgment interest, and $150,000 in civil penalty, less any federal,

state, or local taxes and costs and expenses of distributing the Fair Fund. The Plan proposes to

distribute the Fair Fund for the benefit of Argent Classic Convertible Arbitrage Fund L.P. Class

A and Class B Limited Partners who were harmed from January 1, 2006, through April 2, 2009,

by the interest-free loan practice described in the Order. The Fair Fund is not being distributed

according to a claims-made process.

The Division of Enforcement now requests that the Commission approve the Plan. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 1104 of the Commission’s 

Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1104, that the Plan is approved.

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Elizabeth M. Murphy

Secretary
# Materials Not Included in Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA - 2015 - 0250 Directorate Identifier: 2014NM216AD A320 - 34 - 1463 --- 3/9/10 A320 - 34 - 1456 --- 12/2/09 A320 - 34 - 1170, R04 --- 5/24/00 A320 - 34 - 1170, R05 --- 9/22/00 A320 - 34 - 1170, R06 --- 10/18/01 A320 - 34 - 1170, R07 --- 12/4/01 A320 - 34 - 1170, R08 --- 1/15/03 A320 - 34 - 1170, R09 --- 2/17/03 A320 - 34 - 1170, R10 --- 11/21/03 A320 - 34 - 1170, R11 --- 8/19/04 A320 - 34 - 1170, R12 --- 12/2/04 A320 - 34 - 1170, R13 --- 1/18/05 A320 - 34 - 1170, R14 --- 4/21/05 A320 - 34 - 1170, R15 --- 7/19/05 A320 - 34 - 1170, R16 --- 11/23/06 A320 - 34 - 1170, R17 --- 2/14/07 A320 - 34 - 1170, R18 --- 10/9/09 A320 - 34 - 1170, R19 --- 11/9/09 A320 - 34 - 1170, R20 --- 12/1/10 A320 - 34 - 1170, R21 --- 3/24/11 A320 - 34 - 1170, R22 --- 7/19/11 A320 - 34 - 1170, R23 --- 2/3/12 A320 - 34 - 1170, R24 --- 4/12/12 A320 - 34 - 1170, R25 --- 9/4/12 A320 - 34 - 1170, R26 --- 9/16/13 A320 - 34 - 1170, R27 --- 3/18/14 A320 - 34 - 1170, R28 --- 9/1/14 A320 - 34 - 1170, R29 --- 2/16/15 Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
§ 211.4 Waiver of documents for returning residents. ( a ) Pursuant to the authority contained in section 211(b) of the Act, an alien previously lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence who, upon return from a temporary absence was inadmissible because of failure to have or to present a valid passport, immigrant visa, reentry permit, border crossing card, or other document required at the time of entry, may be granted a waiver of such requirement in the discretion of the district director if the district director determines that such alien: ( 1 ) Was not otherwise inadmissible at the time of entry, or having been otherwise inadmissible at the time of entry is with respect thereto qualified for an exemption from deportability under section 237(a)(1)(H) of the Act; and
( 2 ) Is not otherwise subject to removal.
( b ) Denial of a waiver by the district director is not appealable but shall be without prejudice to renewal of an application and reconsideration in proceedings before the immigration judge.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 335 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 335

Instructing the managers on the part of the Senate on the bill S. 1790 
   (116th Congress) to insist upon the members of the conference to 
  include the provisions contained in section 2906 of the Senate bill 
  (relating to replenishment of certain military construction funds).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 2019

 Ms. McSally submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Instructing the managers on the part of the Senate on the bill S. 1790 
   (116th Congress) to insist upon the members of the conference to 
  include the provisions contained in section 2906 of the Senate bill 
  (relating to replenishment of certain military construction funds).

    Resolved, That the managers on the part of the Senate at the 
conference on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses on the House 
amendment to the bill S. 1790 be instructed to insist upon the 
provisions contained in section 2906 of the Senate bill (relating to 
replenishment of certain military construction funds).
                                 <all>
```
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

L3 Harris Technologies, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 62474

)

Under Contract No. N00024-05-C-4304 et al. )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Paul E. Pompeo, Esq.

Sonia Tabriz, Esq.

 Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

 Washington, DC

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Arthur M. Taylor, Esq.

 DCMA Chief Trial Attorney

Alexander M. Healy, Esq.

 Trial Attorney

 Defense Contract Management Agency

 Hanscom AFB, MA

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: February 9, 2021

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62474, Appeal of L3 Harris 

Technologies, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: February 9, 2021

JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
#### § 633.103 Regulatory authority.

All required contract provisions contained in Form FHWA-1273 are requirements of regulations promulgated by the FHWA or other Federal agencies. The authority for each provision will be cited in the text of Form FHWA-1273.