alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

RICHMOND DIVISION

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF APPEARANCE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Gates Law Offices, by counsel, hereby gives notice 

that Richard O. Gates, Esq., withdraws from the pending cases listed on the attached Exhibit A 

effective April 5, 2018.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Mary-Scott Gates Hennigan, Esq., will 

replace Richard O. Gates, Esquire, as counsel for the Debtor(s) in the pending cases listed on Exhibit 

A. 

Respectfully submitted,

Date: ___04/12/2018______ __/s/ Mary-Scott Gates Hennigan___________

Mary-Scott Gates Hennigan, VSB #73029

Gates Law Offices

P. O. Box 187

Chesterfield, VA 23832

Scottie@GatesLawVa.com

Telephone: 804-748-0382

Fax: 804-748-6349

__/s/ Richard O. Gates____________________

VSB #13857

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing Notice was served by regular mail or ELECTRONIC 

MAIL through the Court’s electronic filing system. 

 

__/s/ Mary-Scott Gates Hennigan___________

Case 17-32535-KLP Doc 35 Filed 04/13/18 Entered 04/13/18 14:58:13 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
EXHIBIT A

15-36542-KLP Harris, David Ray, Sr. & Phyllis F.

16-30640-KLP Munson, Kimberly Ann

17-33947-KLP Boone, Wanda Denise

17-34741-KLP Booker, Duane Anthony, Sr.

17-35693-KLP Johnson, Dawn Michelle

15-36606-KLP Williams, David, Jr. & Creola Phillips

16-31994-KRH Cummings, Jeffery Dean & Rosemary Lowery

Case 17-32535-KLP Doc 35 Filed 04/13/18 Entered 04/13/18 14:58:13 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
#### Henry Hornstein et al., Appellants, v. Paramount Pictures, Inc., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., TJntermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
**Re: Revised Agenda for Navajo Nation**  **Revised Agenda for Navajo Nation Revised Agenda for Navajo Nation /**  **EPA Consultation on Four Corners EPA Consultation on Four Corners**  **EPA Consultation on Four Corners -**  **Wed. June**  **13**

**th Michele L**  **Michele L .**

**. Morris**  **to: Colleen McKaughan**  **06/11/2012 03:03 PM Cc:**  **Teddy Ryerson, Laura Ebbert, Pamela Overman, Anita Lee, Zoe Heller, Sherrick Roanhorse , "Stephen B. Etsitty" , Bill**  **Johnson, Eugenia Quintana, navajonationpress , Alberta** 

### Colleen: For your information, the following list will be th e attendees from the NN: President Ben Shelly First Lady Martha Shelly Michele Morris, Exec.Staff Asst, OPVP Erny Zah, Com.Dir, OPVP Arnold Silversmith , Exec. Protection Service,OPVP Steve Etsitty, Exec.Dir, NNEPA Eugenia Quintana, Dept.Dir,NNEPA- Air &Toxics Anoop Sumukarean , Env.Eng., NNEPA- AQCP Bill Johnson, NN-Dept of Justice Please see below is a revised agenda. Thanks again, we look forward to meeting with you and your team

. Consultation between Navajo Nation and EPA on Four Corners Power Plant June 13, 2012 9 - 11 AM San Francisco, CA

Draft Agenda

1. Welcome, introductions, and opening remarks b y Navajo Nation and EPA

### 2. EPA Overview of Navajo Input on Four Corners

3. Update on Four Corners BART Rulemaking 4. Economic Impacts to Navajo Nation of the BART Alternative 5. Updates on Permitting Actions and Law Suits r elated to Four Corners Power Plant 6. Update on EIS/NEPA process for Four Corners a nd Navajo Mine 7. Future Partnerships 8. Closing Remarks From: colleen mckaughan < mckaughan.colleen@epamail.epa.gov > Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 16:05:01 -0700 Cc: Teddy Ryerson < Ryerson.Teddy@epamail.epa.gov >, Laura Ebbert < Ebbert.Laura@epamail.epa.gov >, Pamela Overman < Overman.Pamela@epamail.epa.gov >, Anita Lee < Lee.Anita@epamail.epa.gov >, Zoe Heller < Heller.Zoe@epamail.epa.gov > Subject: Revised Agenda for Navajo Nation/EPA Consultation on Four Corners - Wed. June 13th **Hi, Michele, Here is the revised agenda based on our conversation this afternoon. I also left you a voicemail. Please**  **let us know if this agenda covers all the issues that the President would like to discuss next Wednesday . We appreciate the opportunity to meet with you and look forward to our discussion next week .** 

**Consultation between Navajo Nation and EPA on Four Corners Power Plant June 13, 2012**  **9 - 11 AM San Francisco, CA**  **Draft Agenda Welcome, introductions, and opening remarks by Navajo Nation and EPA**   **EPA Overview of Navajo Input on Four Corners**  **Update on Four Corners BART Rulemaking**  **Economic Impacts to Navajo Nation of the BART Alternative**  **Updates on Permitting Actions related to Four Corners Power Plant**  **Update on EIS/NEPA process for Four Corners and Navajo Mine**  **Closing Remarks**  **Colleen W. McKaughan Associate Director, Air Division**  **USEPA, Region 9 (520) 498-0118**
Case 16-73269-SCS Doc 22 Filed 11/07/16 Entered 11/07/16 13:13:00 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 10
Case 16-73269-SCS Doc 22 Filed 11/07/16 Entered 11/07/16 13:13:00 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 10
Case 16-73269-SCS Doc 22 Filed 11/07/16 Entered 11/07/16 13:13:00 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 10
Case 16-73269-SCS Doc 22 Filed 11/07/16 Entered 11/07/16 13:13:00 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 10
Case 16-73269-SCS Doc 22 Filed 11/07/16 Entered 11/07/16 13:13:00 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 10
Case 16-73269-SCS Doc 22 Filed 11/07/16 Entered 11/07/16 13:13:00 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 10
Case 16-73269-SCS Doc 22 Filed 11/07/16 Entered 11/07/16 13:13:00 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 10
Case 16-73269-SCS Doc 22 Filed 11/07/16 Entered 11/07/16 13:13:00 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 10
Case 16-73269-SCS Doc 22 Filed 11/07/16 Entered 11/07/16 13:13:00 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 10
Case 16-73269-SCS Doc 22 Filed 11/07/16 Entered 11/07/16 13:13:00 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 10
Case 15-35965-KLP Doc 19 Filed 01/07/16 Entered 01/07/16 16:57:18 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
Case 15-35965-KLP Doc 19 Filed 01/07/16 Entered 01/07/16 16:57:18 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3
Case 15-35965-KLP Doc 19 Filed 01/07/16 Entered 01/07/16 16:57:18 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 65 ) ll-K-(B)-5 3 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:50 AM Sheet 65 of 325P. 2 

### 0 ! T 

# ®^)

a 

# £B II-K-(B)-5 3
INDUSTRIAL ANNUALIZE D FUE L PRICE S B YREGION AND FUE L TYPE . Lette r T . Hogan , EE

A t o L . Jones , EPArSASD . Augus t 18 , 1980 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUND I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(B)-5 3
### §460hh–5. Concurrent legislative jurisdiction with State of Oklahoma; requisites; notice in Federal Register

Notwithstanding the provisions of section 153 of this title, which retain exclusive jurisdiction in the United States, upon notification in writing to the Secretary by the appropriate State officials of the acceptance by the State of Oklahoma of concurrent legislative jurisdiction over the lands formerly within the Platt National Park, the Secretary shall publish a notice to that effect in the Federal Register and, upon such publication, concurrent legislative jurisdiction over such lands is hereby ceded to the State of Oklahoma: Provided, That such cession of jurisdiction shall not occur until a written agreement has been reached between the State of Oklahoma and the Secretary providing for the exercise of concurrent jurisdiction over all other lands and waters within the Chickasaw National Recreation Area.

(Pub. L. 94–235, §6, Mar. 17, 1976, 90 Stat. 236.)
EX-31.1               >RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION OF PAUL EGAN

                  RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION

I, Paul Egan, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of
FreeStar Technology Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report; and

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report.

Dated: March 25, 2004                  By: /s/  Paul Egan
                                       Paul Egan, President
###### Editorial Note on Part 1240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1240 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and at 68 FR 10355, Mar. 3, 2003.

#### § 1240.34 Renewal of application for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Act.

An adjustment application by an alien paroled under section 212(d)(5) of the Act, which has been denied by the district director, may be renewed in exclusion proceedings under section 236 of the Act (as in effect prior to April 1, 1997) before an immigration judge under the following two conditions: first, the denied application must have been properly filed subsequent to the applicant's earlier inspection and admission to the United States; and second, the applicant's later absence from and return to the United States must have been under the terms of an advance parole authorization on Form I-512 granted to permit the applicant's absence and return to pursue the previously filed adjustment application. In a relevant case, the immigration judge may adjudicate the sufficiency of an Affidavit of Support Under Section 213A (Form I-864), executed on behalf of an applicant for admission or for adjustment of status, in accordance with the provisions of section 213A of the Act and 8 CFR part 213a.

[62 FR 10367, Mar. 6, 1997. Redesignated in part and duplicated in part from part 240 at 68 FR 9838, 9840, Feb. 28, 2003, as amended at 71 FR 35757, June 21, 2006]
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 58 (Friday, March 25, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 16842]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7035]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


National Endowment for the Arts; Arts Advisory Panel

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that one meeting 
of the Arts Advisory Panel to the National Council on the Arts will be 
held at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20506 as follows (ending time is approximate):
    Arts Education (application review): April 14, 2011, by 
teleconference. This meeting, from 1 p.m. to 1:45 p.m. DST will be 
closed.
    The closed portions of meetings are for the purpose of Panel 
review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendations on financial 
assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities 
Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in confidence to 
the agency. In accordance with the determination of the Chairman of 
November 10, 2009, these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant 
to subsection (c)(6) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code.
    Further information with reference to these meetings can be 
obtained from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of Guidelines & Panel 
Operations, National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC 20506, or 
call 202/682-5691.

    Dated: March 21, 2011.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 2011-7035 Filed 3-24-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
### §5404. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 103–451, §5, Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4774, related to National Maritime Heritage Grants Advisory Committee.
HECO Exhibit 99.3



Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc.

RECONCILIATION OF ELECTRIC UTILITY OPERATING

INCOME PER HEI AND HECO CONSOLIDATED

STATEMENTS OF INCOME



|                                                                                                                            |  |      |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------- | - | ---- | - | ------- | ---- |  | - | ------- | -
|Years ended December 31                                                                                                     |  | 2005 |         |   | 2004 |   |         | 2003 | 
|(in thousands)                                                                                                              |  |      |         |   |      |   |         |      | 
|                                                                                                                            |  |      |        
|Operating income from regulated and nonregulated activities before income taxes (per HEI Consolidated Statements of Income) |  | $    | 161,703 |   |      | $ | 173,903 |      |  | $ | 176,565 |  
|                                                                                                                            |  |      |        
|Deduct:                                                                                                                     |  |      |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|Income taxes on regulated activities                                                                                        |  |      | (45,029 | ) |      |   | (50,059 | )    |  |   | (50,175 | )
|Revenues from nonregulated activities                                                                                       |  |      | (4,674  | ) |      |   | (3,796  | )    |  |   | (3,647  | )
|                                                                                                                            |  |      |        
|Add:                                                                                                                        |  |      |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|Expenses from nonregulated activities                                                                                       |  |      | 1,542   |   |      |   | 1,244   |      |  |   | 2,095   |  
|                                                                                                                            |  |      |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|Operating income from regulated activities after income taxes (per HECO Consolidated Statements of Income)                  |  | $    | 113,542 |   |      | $ | 121,292 |      |  | $ | 124,838 |  
|                                                                                                                            |  |      |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |
Suzanne E. Wade, Chapter 13 Trustee

Virginia State Bar Number 31868

7202 Glen Forest Drive, Suite 202

Richmond, VA 23226

(804) 775-0979

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

RICHMOND DIVISION

In re: Bradley William Lang, Debtor ) Case No. 16-32482-KLP

) Chapter 13

TRUSTEE’S RESPONSE TO DEBTOR’S MOTION FOR HARDSHIP DISCHARGE

AND REQUEST FOR HEARING

COMES NOW Suzanne E. Wade, Chapter 13 Trustee, and files this response to the Debtor’s 

Motion for Hardship Discharge, as follows:

1. The Debtor filed this Chapter 13 Petition, now pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court, 

Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division, on May 17, 2016 under 11 U.S.C Chapter 13.

2. Suzanne E. Wade has been appointed as the Chapter 13 Trustee in this case and continues to serve 

as the Trustee.

3. On February 22, 2021 the Debtor filed a Motion for Hardship Discharge due to decreased income 

resulting from COVID-19. 

WHEREFORE, the Chapter 13 Trustee, respectfully requests the Court set for hearing the 

Debtor’s Motion for Hardship Discharge.

Respectfully submitted,

Date: March 2, 2020 /s/ Suzanne E. Wade.

 Chapter 13 Trustee 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify a true copy of the foregoing TRUSTEE’S RESPONSE TO THE DEBTOR’S 

MOTION FOR HARDSHIP DISCHARGE was served electronically or by first-class mail, postage 

prepaid, this 2nd day of March 2021, upon the following parties:

Bradley William Lang

38 Kennon Road

Mineral, VA 23117

Case 16-32482-KLP Doc 61 Filed 03/02/21 Entered 03/02/21 09:32:02 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 3
Suzanne E. Wade, Chapter 13 Trustee

Virginia State Bar Number 31868

7202 Glen Forest Drive, Suite 202

Richmond, VA 23226

(804) 775-0979

James E. Kane

Kane & Papa, PC

1313 East Cary Street

P.O. Box 508

Richmond, VA 23218-0508

jkane@kaneandpapa.com

Daniel Kevin Eisenhauer

Orlans, PC 

PO Box 2548 

Leesburg, VA 20177

ANHSOrlans@InfoEx.com

Johnie Rush Muncy

Samuel I. White, P.C. 

1804 Staples Mill Road 

Suite 200 

Richmond, VA 23230

jmuncy@siwpc.com

Credit One Bank Na

Po Box 98873

Las Vegas, NV 89193

Daniel L. Rosenthal

2819 N Parham Rd.

Suite 110

Henrico, VA 23294

Internal Revenue Service

Kansas City, MO 64999-0002

Jl Walston & Associate

1107 West Main St., Suite 201

Durham, NC 27701

Kohls/Capital One

Po Box 3120

Milwaukee, WI 53201

Professional Restoration Serv.

4965 Cox Rd.

Glen Allen, VA 23060

Case 16-32482-KLP Doc 61 Filed 03/02/21 Entered 03/02/21 09:32:02 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 3
Suzanne E. Wade, Chapter 13 Trustee

Virginia State Bar Number 31868

7202 Glen Forest Drive, Suite 202

Richmond, VA 23226

(804) 775-0979

Seterus

PO Box 1077

Hartford, CT 06149-1077

Transworld Sys Inc/38

507 Prudential Rd

Horsham, PA 19044

UVA Physicians Group

500 Ray C Hunt Dr.

Charlottesville, VA 22903

Verizon

500 Technology DrSuite 500

Weldon Spring, MO 63304

Virginia Emergency Physicians

1602 Skipwith Road

Henrico, VA 23229

/s/ Suzanne E. Wade.

 Chapter 13 Trustee 

Case 16-32482-KLP Doc 61 Filed 03/02/21 Entered 03/02/21 09:32:02 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 3
United States Court of Appeals,

Eleventh Circuit.

No. 94-2516.

Lora LOHR, Michael Lohr, Her Husband, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

MEDTRONIC, INC., a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

Oct. 28, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of Florida (No. 93-482-CIV-J-20); Harvey E. Schlesinger,

Judge.

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before BLACK and BARKETT, Circuit Judges, and RONEY, Senior Circuit

Judge.

PER CURIAM:

On June 26, 1996, the Supreme Court reversed this panel's

opinion in Lohr v. Medtronic, Inc., 56 F.3d 1335 (11th Cir.1995).

See Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 2240, 135

L.Ed.2d 700 (1996). Pursuant to the Supreme Court's opinion, we

now reverse the district court's dismissal of plaintiff's complaint

and remand the case to the district court for further proceedings

not inconsistent with the Supreme Court's opinion.

REVERSED and REMANDED.
Exhibit 10.23

                              Consulting Agreement

Between:
AdZone Research, Inc. (Company)
and
John A. Cardona (Consultant)

The company agrees to contract the consultant for services as consultant for a
period of one year beginning January 18, 2003.

The consultant will provide services relating to sales, marketing, PR and
business expansion.

The consultant will be paid $3,500 per month in stock (issued at the end of each
month at the current closing price of each weeks low price and will be issued
monthly and a issuance resolution being generated).

The consultant will be paid $100 per week in cash. In addition to the above
totals.

The consultant's total compensation shall be equal to the total compensation
earned by Charles A. Cardona, CEO. The amounts will be paid in cash equal to
Charles A. Cardona, CEO cash or any amounts not paid as outlined above, shall be
accrued, the choice being John A. Cardona's.



AdZone Research, Inc.



John A Cardona
### §534. Termination and cancellation of easements; notice; hearing

An easement granted under sections 532 to 538 of this title may be terminated by consent of the owner of the easement, by condemnation, or after a five-year period of nonuse the Secretary may, if he finds the owner has abandoned the easement, make a determination to cancel it. Before the Secretary may cancel an easement for nonuse the owner of such easement must be notified of the determination to cancel and be given, upon his request made within sixty days after receipt of the notice, a hearing in accordance with such rules and regulations as may be issued by the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 88–657, §3, Oct. 13, 1964, 78 Stat. 1089.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of certain enforcement functions of Secretary or other official in Department of Agriculture under sections 532 to 538 of this title to Federal Inspector, Office of Federal Inspector for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System, and subsequent transfer to Secretary of Energy, then to Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Projects, see Transfer of Functions note set out under section 533 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 1003
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1003 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and at 68 FR 10350, Mar. 5, 2003.

§ 1003.35 Depositions and subpoenas. ( a ) *Depositions.* If an Immigration Judge is satisfied that a witness is not reasonably available at the place of hearing and that said witness' testimony or other evidence is essential, the Immigration Judge may order the taking of deposition either at his or her own instance or upon application of a party. Such order shall designate the official by whom the deposition shall be taken, may prescribe and limit the content, scope, or manner of taking the deposition, and may direct the production of documentary evidence.
( b ) *Subpoenas issued subsequent to commencement of proceedings* — ( 1 ) *General.* In any proceeding before an Immigration Judge, other than under 8 CFR part 335, the Immigration Judge shall have exclusive jurisdiction to issue subpoenas requiring the attendance of witnesses or for the production of books, papers and other documentary evidence, or both. An Immigration Judge may issue a subpoena upon his or her own volition or upon application of the Service or the alien.
( 2 ) *Application for subpoena.* A party applying for a subpoena shall be required, as a condition precedent to its issuance, to state in writing or at the proceeding, what he or she expects to prove by such witnesses or documentary evidence, and to show affirmatively that he or she has made diligent effort, without success, to produce the same.
( 3 ) *Issuance of subpoena.* Upon being satisfied that a witness will not appear and testify or produce documentary evidence and that the witness' evidence is essential, the Immigration Judge shall issue a subpoena. The subpoena shall state the title of the proceeding and shall command the person to whom it is directed to attend and to give testimony at a time and place specified. The subpoena may also command the person to whom it is directed to produce the books, papers, or documents specified in the subpoena.
( 4 ) *Appearance of witness.* If the witness is at a distance of more than 100 miles from the place of the proceeding, the subpoena shall provide for the witness' appearance at the Immigration Court nearest to the witness to respond to oral or written interrogatories, unless there is no objection by any party to the witness' appearance at the proceeding.
( 5 ) *Service.* A subpoena issued under this section may be served by any person over 18 years of age not a party to the case.
( 6 ) *Invoking aid of court.* If a witness neglects or refuses to appear and testify as directed by the subpoena served upon him or her in accordance with the provisions of this section, the Immigration Judge issuing the subpoena shall request the United States Attorney for the district in which the subpoena was issued to report such neglect or refusal to the United States District Court and to request such court to issue an order requiring the witness to appear and testify and to produce the books, papers or documents designated in the subpoena.
[62 FR 10335, Mar. 6, 1997]