alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§581, 581a. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–307, §8(a), June 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 356

Section 581, acts May 22, 1928, ch. 678, §1, 45 Stat. 699; Apr. 24, 1950, ch. 97, §17(a), 64 Stat. 87, authorized investigations, experiments, and tests affecting reforestation and forest products through cooperation with State and other agencies.

Section 581a, acts May 22, 1928, ch. 678, §2, 45 Stat. 700; June 15, 1936, ch. 553, 49 Stat. 1515, set forth provisions establishing and authorizing appropriations for specific forest experiment stations.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1978, see section 9 of Pub. L. 95–307, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1641 of this title.
### §460d–1. Rentals or other considerations in leases for construction, maintenance, and operation of commercial recreational facilities; adjustment by Chief of Engineers

The Chief of Engineers, under the supervision of the Secretary of the Army, is authorized to amend any lease entered into providing for the construction, maintenance, and operation of commercial recreational facilities at a water resource development project under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Army so as to provide for the adjustment, either by increase or decrease, from time to time during the term of such lease of the amount of rental or other consideration payable to the United States under such lease, when and to the extent he determines such adjustment or extension to be necessary or advisable in the public interest. No adjustment shall be made under the authority of this section so as to increase or decrease the amount of rental or other consideration payable under such lease for any period prior to the date of such adjustment.

(Pub. L. 87–236, Sept. 14, 1961, 75 Stat. 509; Pub. L. 89–298, title II, §215, Oct. 27, 1965, 79 Stat. 1088.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1965—Pub. L. 89–298 struck out "before November 1, 1956" after "lease entered into".
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.6
                              SUBSIDIARY GUARANTEE

     For value received, IASIS Healthcare MSO Sub of Salt Lake City, LLC, a Utah
limited liability company (the "Guarantor", which term includes any successor
Person under the Indenture referred to below) has, jointly and severally,
unconditionally guaranteed, to the extent set forth in the Indenture and subject
to the provisions in the Indenture dated as of October 15, 1999, as supplemented
by the supplemental indenture dated as of October 25, 1999 (the "Indenture"),
among the Company, the Guarantors signatories thereto and The Bank of New York,
as trustee (the "Trustee"), (a) the due and punctual payment of the principal
of, premium, if any, and interest on the Notes (as defined in the Indenture),
whether at maturity, by acceleration, redemption or otherwise, the due and
punctual payment of interest on overdue principal and premium, and, to the
extent permitted by law, interest, and the due and punctual performance of all
other obligations of the Company to the Holders or the Trustee all in accordance
with the terms of the Indenture and (b) in case of any extension of time of
payment or renewal of any Notes or any of such other obligations, that the same
will be promptly paid in full when due or performed in accordance with the terms
of the extension or renewal, whether at stated maturity, by acceleration or
otherwise. The obligations of the Guarantors to the Holders of Notes and to the
Trustee pursuant to the Subsidiary Guarantee and the Indenture are expressly set
forth in Article 11 of the Indenture and reference is hereby made to the
Indenture for the precise terms of the Subsidiary Guarantee. Each Holder of a
Note, by accepting the same, (a) agrees to and shall be bound by such
provisions, (b) authorizes the Trustee, on behalf of such Holder, to make such
action as may be necessary or appropriate to effectuate the subordination as
provided in the Indenture and (c) appoints the Trustee attorney-in-fact of such
Holder for such purpose; provided, however, that the Indebtedness evidenced by
this Subsidiary Guarantee shall cease to be so subordinated and subject in right
of payment upon any defeasance of this Note in accordance with the provisions of
the Indenture.




<PAGE>   2

                              IASIS HEALTHCARE MSO SUB OF SALT LAKE CITY, LLC

                              By: /s/ Wayne Gower
                                 ---------------------------------------------
                                 Name:  C. Wayne Gower
                                 Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
### §583a. Cooperative agreements with private owners; privileges of private owners; recordation of agreements

The Secretary of Agriculture, with respect to forest land under his jurisdiction, and the Secretary of the Interior, with respect to forest land under his jurisdiction, are severally authorized, for the purposes specified in section 583 of this title, to enter into cooperative agreements with private owners of forest land within a cooperative sustained-yield unit, established pursuant to said section, providing for the coordinated management of such private forest land and of federally owned or administered forest lands within the sustained-yield unit involved. Each cooperative agreement may give the cooperating private landowner the privilege of purchasing without competitive bidding at prices not less than their appraised value, subject to periodic readjustments of stumpage rates and to such other conditions and requirements as the Secretary may prescribe, timber and other forest products from federally owned or administered forest land within the unit, in accordance with the provisions of sustained-yield management plans formulated or approved by the Secretary for the unit; shall limit the time, rate, and method of cutting or otherwise harvesting timber and other forest products from the land of the cooperating private landowner, due consideration being given to the character and condition of the timber, to the relation of the proposed cutting to the sustained-yield plan for the unit, and to the productive capacity of the land; shall prescribe the terms and conditions, but not the price, upon which the cooperating private landowner may sell to any person timber and other forest products from his land, compliance by the purchaser with such conditions to be required by the contract of sale; shall contain such provisions as the Secretary deems necessary to protect the reasonable interest of other owners of forest land within the unit; and shall contain such other provisions as the Secretary believes necessary to carry out the purposes of this subchapter.

Each cooperative agreement shall be placed on record in the county or counties in which the lands of the cooperating private landowner covered thereby are located, and the costs incident to such recordation may be paid out of any funds available for the protection or management of federally owned or administered forest land within the unit. When thus recorded, the agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, successors, and assigns of the owner of such land, and upon purchasers of timber or other forest products from such land, throughout the life of such cooperative agreement.

(Mar. 29, 1944, ch. 146, §2, 58 Stat. 132.)
#### § 971.102 Applicability.

The definitions in this subpart are applicable to this part, except as otherwise provided.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Harvest  Valley  Ventures,
Inc.,  on Form  10-QSB for the  period  ending  June 30,  2001 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, B. Stephen Bailey, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Christopher Lee JOHNSON; Veronica Moody Johnson, Defendants & Third Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. EMERALD GREENS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS, jointly and severally and in their individual capacity, per*438sonally (immediate past and present members); Mike Lewis, President; Richard Matthews; Craig Poppin; Mark Williams; Peter Nichols; Kathy Thomas; Anne Del Core; David Thompson, Third Party DefendantsAppellees, v. Emerald Greens Property Owners Association, PlaintiffAppellee, Mary E. COX, Movant.

No. 01-2438.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 18, 2002.

Decided May 14, 2002.

Christopher Lee Johnson, Veronica Moody Johnson, Appellants Pro Se. Barry Randolph Koch, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Gerrit W. Benson, Michael Allen Inman, Inman *&*Strickler, P.L.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia; Alexander William Stiles, Williams, Mullen, Clark *&*Dobbins, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia; David C. Burton, Williams, Mullen, Clark & Dobbins, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Lee Johnson and Veronica Moody Johnson appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Emerald Greens Property Owners Association on the Johnsons’ cross-claims, granting summary judgment to the Board of Directors of the Emerald Greens Property Owners Association and to its individual members, denying the Johnsons’ motion for summary judgment, and remanding the remaining claims to state court. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Johnson v. Emerald Greens Prop. Owners Ass’n,*No. CA-00-514-2 (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 25, 2001 *&*entered Oct. 26, 2001; Oct. 30, 2001). We deny the Johnsons’ motions to stay review of the case and to consolidate the case with No. 02-1371, *Johnson v. City of Chesapeake.*We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
# Official Journal C 101/27 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 101 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6327 March 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 101

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6327 March 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 101/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 February 2020 to 29 February 2020(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 101/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 February 2020 to 29 February 2020(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
FROM: THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT, COUNTY OF DEER LODGE,

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. HARVEY JAMES CALDWELL, Defendant.

NO. DC-89-06 DECISION

On August 2, 1989, the Defendant was sentenced to Negligent Homicide, ten (10) years; three Counts of Negligent Vehicular Assault and second offense DUI, six (6) months on each count; with all sentences to be served concurrently; 129 days credit for time served.

On December 6, 1990, the Defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

*51DATED this 6th day of December, 1990.

The Defendant was present and was represented by Terrance Healow, of the Montana Defender Project. The state was represented by Mike Grayson, Deputy County Attorney from Deer Lodge County.

Before hearing the application, the Defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it if such is possible. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

After careful consideration, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence imposed shall remain the same.

The reason for the decision is pursuant to Rule 17 of the Sentence Review Division.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the Annual Report of The Hertz Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark P. Frissora, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



Date:
March 4, 2009

By:

/s/ MARK P. FRISSORA Mark P. Frissora
Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
Emily Connor Fort (VSB #83889) 

Mark C. Leffler (VSB #40712) 

Boleman Law Firm, P.C. 

P.O. Box 11588 

Richmond, VA 23230 

Telephone (804) 358-9900 

Counsel for Plaintiff

Thomas D. Domonoske (VSB # 35434) 

Consumer Litigation Associates 

281 N. Mason Street, #811 

Harrisonburg, VA 22803 

Telephone (540) 442-7706 

Counsel for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

Eastern District of Virginia 

Richmond Division 

 

In re: Charese Ebony Johnson

Debtor 

Case No. 16-31620-KLP

Chapter 13

Address: 5824 Westower Drive Apt B 

 Richmond, VA 23225 

Last four digits of Social Security No: xxx-xx-3576 (Debtor)

______________________________________________________________________ 

 

CHARESE EBONY JOHNSON, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. Adv. Pro. No. 16-03152-KLP 

 

NC FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS OF UTAH, LLC, 

d/b/a NETCREDIT 

 Defendant. 

______________________________________________________________________ 

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

 The parties have agreed to a settlement in this matter and will submit appropriate 

documents to the Court once prepared and executed. 

Case 16-03152-KLP Doc 22 Filed 12/29/16 Entered 12/29/16 17:15:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
 Respectfully submitted, 

 Charese Ebony Johnson 

 By Counsel 

 By: /s/ Mark C. Leffler 

Emily Connor Fort (VSB #83889) 

Mark C. Leffler (VSB #40712) 

Boleman Law Firm, P.C. 

P.O. Box 11588 

Richmond, VA 23230 

Telephone (804) 358-9900 

Counsel for Plaintiff 

Thomas D. Domonoske (VSB # 35434) 

Consumer Litigation Associates 

281 N. Mason Street, #811 

Harrisonburg, VA 22803 

Telephone (540) 442-7706 

Counsel for Plaintiff

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I certify that on December 29, 2016, I have transmitted a true copy of the 

foregoing document by CM/ECF to Corey S. Booker, Esquire, attorney for NetCredit. 

 

 By: /s/ Mark C. Leffler 

 Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 16-03152-KLP Doc 22 Filed 12/29/16 Entered 12/29/16 17:15:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 86057 / June 6, 2019

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-17558

In the Matter of 

BLUFOREST, INC.

NOTICE THAT INITIAL DECISION HAS BECOME FINAL

The time for filing a petition for review of the initial decision in this proceeding has 

expired. No such petition has been filed by Bluforest, Inc., and the Commission has not chosen 

to review the decision on its own initiative.

Accordingly, notice is hereby given, pursuant to Rule 360(d) of the Commission's Rules 

of Practice,1that the initial decision of the administrative law judge has become the final 

decision of the Commission with respect to Bluforest, Inc.2The order contained in that decision 

is hereby declared final. The initial decision ordered that, pursuant to Section 12(j) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registration of the registered securities of Bluforest, Inc., is 

revoked. The revocation is effective as of June 7, 2019.

For the Commission, by the Office of the General Counsel, pursuant to delegated 

authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

 Acting Secretary

 

1

 17 C.F.R. § 201.360(d).

2

 Bluforest, Inc., Initial Decision Release No. 1363 (Mar. 7, 2019), 2019 WL 1082156. The 

Central Index Key number for Bluforest, Inc., is 1440172.
### §1109. Court action; service of process

In an action against the Commission instituted in a district court of the United States, service of the summons and of the complaint upon the Commission shall be made by delivering a copy thereof to the United States attorney for the district in which the action is brought, or to an assistant United States attorney, or to a clerical employee designated by the United States attorney to accept service in a writing filed with the clerk of the court, and by sending a copy of the summons and of the complaint to the Commission by registered or certified mail.

(Pub. L. 88–363, §10, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.)
### §459c–6a. The Clem Miller Environmental Education Center; designation

The Secretary shall designate the principal environmental education center within the seashore as "The Clem Miller Environmental Education Center", in commemoration of the vision and leadership which the late Representative Clem Miller gave to the creation and protection of Point Reyes National Seashore.

(Pub. L. 87–657, §7, as added Pub. L. 94–544, §4(b), Oct. 18, 1976, 90 Stat. 2515, and Pub. L. 94–567, §7(b), Oct. 20, 1976, 90 Stat. 2695.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 4(b) of Pub. L. 94–544 and section 7(b) of Pub. L. 94–567 enacted identical sections.
### §491. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act May 11, 1926, ch. 286, 44 Stat. 512, which authorized Secretary of Agriculture to permit exportation of timber and other products from State or Territory when cut or removed from national forests situated therein, was from Department of Agriculture Appropriation Act, 1927, and was not repeated in subsequent appropriations. See section 616 of this title. Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

Feb. 10, 1925, ch. 200, 43 Stat. 834.

June 5, 1924, ch. 266, 43 Stat. 443.

Feb. 26, 1923, ch. 119, 42 Stat. 1302.

May 11, 1922, ch. 185, 42 Stat. 519.

Mar. 3, 1921, ch. 127, 41 Stat. 1326.

May 31, 1920, ch. 217, 41 Stat. 706.

July 24, 1919, ch. 26, 41 Stat. 248.

Oct. 1, 1918, ch. 178, 40 Stat. 985.

Mar. 4, 1917, ch. 179, 39 Stat. 1145.
### §555b. Street improvements; availability of Forest Service funds

Funds available to the Forest Service shall be available for expenses of, or payment of assessment for, construction of sidewalks, curbs, or street paving along the boundary of Government-owned residential or otherwise improved lots.

(Pub. L. 87–869, §9, Oct. 23, 1962, 76 Stat. 1157.)
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 455 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 455

To authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel in the case of 
         Richard Arjun Kaul v. Senator Charles Schumer, et al.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 12, 2019

Mr. McConnell submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel in the case of 
         Richard Arjun Kaul v. Senator Charles Schumer, et al.

Whereas, Senator Charles Schumer has been named as a defendant in the case of 
        Richard Arjun Kaul v. Senator Charles Schumer, et al., Case No. 19-CV-
        13477-BRM-JAD, currently pending in the United States District Court for 
        the District of New Jersey;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(1), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to defend Members of the Senate in civil actions 
        relating to their official responsibilities: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent 
Senator Schumer in the case of Richard Arjun Kaul v. Senator Charles 
Schumer, et al.
                                 <all>
```