alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The HONORABLE GARY A. FENNER, United States District Judge for the 1 Western District of Missouri.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-4085

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. David E. Longley, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: July 21, 1997 Filed: July 25, 1997

___________ Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. David Longley challenges the 18-month sentence imposed on him by the district court following the revocation of his supervised release. Counsel has filed a brie f 1 pursuant t o Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). We granted Longley leave to file a pro se supplemental brief, which he has not done. We affirm.-2-

We revie w the district court's sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release for an abuse of discretion, and we find none here. See United States v. Carr, 66 F.3d 981 , 983 (8th Cir. 1995) (per curiam); United States v. Grimes , 54 F.3d 489, 492 (8th Cir. 1995). Because Longley's underlying conviction was a Class C felony, the maximum statutory term of imprisonment for violating the conditions of hi s supervis ed release was 24 months, see 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3), and his 18-mont h revocation sentence was well within that maximum. Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### Bowling v. Poe.

April 29, 1941.

*268C. P. Moore and H. N. Dean for appellant.

A. T. W. Manning and Edward R. Hays for appellee.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Cammack

Cammack — Reversing.

Ralph Bowling, plaintiff below, is appealing from a judgment on. a directed verdict given in favor of Robert Poe at the conclusion of his (Bowling’s) evidence. Bowling was driving a sedan car on the state highway toward McKee around 4:30 in the morning of December 5, 1938. Robert Poe was coming from the direction of McKee with a truck load of tobacco. Bowling testified that he saw the truck approaching him; that both lights were burning; that the left headlight on his car was burning; that he pulled his car over to the right side of the road, leaving two wheels about 2% feet on the paved part of the road; that he had his left arm resting* on the window but that he had both hands on the steering-wheel ; that some part of the truck struck his arm, breaking it in four places; that the rear fender of his car and the rear bumper were damaged; and that the truck was driven approximately 250 steps before it was stopped. Other witnesses corroborated Bowling’s testimony.

The court gave a peremptory instruction in favor of Poe at the conclusion of Bowling’s evidence on the idea that “if a plaintiff is guilty of the commission of an act which contributed to an injury and but for which contributing act no injury would have occurred, then the law is for the defendant.” It was the opinion of the court that Bowling was guilty of contributory negligence in having his arm resting on the window.

The appellee cites the case of Owen Motor Freight Lines v. Russell’s Adm’r, 260 Ky. 795, 86 S. W. (2d) 708, 712, in support of the ruling of the trial court. In that case it was said:

> “* * * Though injuries may result from the negligence of a defendant, or of a person for which he is responsible, no recovery can be had therefor, if the plaintiff’s own negligence contributed to his own injuries or death.”

But the case of Miracle v. Cavins, 254 Ky. 644, 72 S. *W.**269(2d) 25, 26, is controlling on the question before us. ín that case it was said:

> “At the time of the accident appellee’s arm was resting on one of the slats, and even if her elbow projected'two or three inches beyond the slats, this was not contributory negligence as a matter of law. Bell & Bell v. Rascoe, 250 Ky. 756, 63 S. W. (2d) 932.” See also cases cited in the Bascoe case. Stanley’s Instructions to Juries, Section 113.

It follows, therefore, that the trial court erred in giving the peremptory instruction in favor of Poe, because the question as to whether Bowling was guilty of contributory negligence by having his arm resting on the window was a question for the jury..

Judgment reversed.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of BlastGard International, Inc., that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the companys financial condition and results of operations.





May 15, 2007





/s/ Michael J. Gordon

Michael J. Gordon, Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4750 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4750

   To amend title 11 of the United States Code to make student loans 
                             dischargeable.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 18, 2019

   Mr. Clay introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 11 of the United States Code to make student loans 
                             dischargeable.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Relief from Excessive Debt Act'' or 
the ``RED Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCEPTION TO DISCHARGE.

    Section 523(a) of title 11, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking paragraph (8); and
            (2) by redesignating paragraphs (9) through (14B) as 
        paragraphs (8) through (14A), respectively.

SEC. 3. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.

    Title 11, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in section 704(c)(1)(C)(iv)(I) by striking ``(14A)'' 
        and inserting ``(14)'';
            (2) in section 1106(c)(1)(C)(iv)(I) by striking ``(14A)'' 
        and inserting ``(14)'';
            (3) in section 1202(c)(1)(C)(iv)(I) by striking ``(14A)'' 
        and inserting ``(14)''; and
            (4) in section 1328(a)(2) by striking ``(8), or (9)'' and 
        inserting ``or (8)''.

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.

    (a) Effective Date.--Except as provided in subsection (b), this Act 
and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Application of Amendments.--The amendments made by this Act 
shall apply only with respect to cases commenced under title 11 of the 
United States Code on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 1214.1 Review of requirements for admission, extension, and maintenance of status.

Every nonimmigrant alien who applies for admission to, or an extension of stay in, the United States, shall establish that he or she is admissible to the United States, or that any ground of inadmissibility has been waived under section 212(d)(3) of the Act. Upon application for admission, the alien shall present a valid passport and valid visa unless either or both documents have been waived. However, an alien applying for extension of stay shall present a passport only if requested to do so by the Service. The passport of an alien applying for admission shall be valid for a minimum of six months from the expiration date of the contemplated period of stay, unless otherwise provided in this chapter, and the alien shall agree to abide by the terms and conditions of his or her admission. The passport of an alien applying for extension of stay shall be valid at the time of application for extension, unless otherwise provided in this chapter, and the alien shall agree to maintain the validity of his or her passport and to abide by all the terms and conditions of his extension. The alien shall also agree to depart the United States at the expiration of his or her authorized period of admission or extension, or upon abandonment of his or her authorized nonimmigrant status. At the time a nonimmigrant alien applies for admission or extension of stay he or she shall post a bond on Form I-352 in the sum of not less than $500, to insure the maintenance of his or her nonimmigrant status and departure from the United States, if required to do so by the director, immigration judge or Board of Immigration Appeals.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16447-16448]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6800]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-74,839]


St. John Knits, Inc., Irvine, CA; Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on January 31, 2011, applicable to workers of St. John Knits, Inc., 
Irvine, California. The workers are engaged in the production of 
women's apparel. The notice was published in the Federal Register on 
February 24, 2011 (76 FR 10397).
    At the request of the State Agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The review shows that on 
August 18, 2008, a certification of eligibility to apply for adjustment 
assistance was issued for all workers of St. John Knits, Sample 
Manufacturing Department, Irvine, California, separated from employment 
on or after June 11, 2007 through August 18, 2010. The notice was 
published in the Federal Register on September 3, 2008 (73 FR 51529).

[[Page 16448]]

    In order to avoid an overlap in worker group coverage, the 
Department is amending the impact dates established for TA-W-74,839. 
The impact date applicable to workers of the Sample Manufacturing 
Department is August 19, 2010. The impact date applicable to all other 
workers of St. Johns Knits, Inc., Irvine, California, is November 3, 
2009.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-75,839 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of St. John Knits, Inc., Sample Manufacturing 
Department, Irvine, California, who became totally or partially 
separated from employment on or after August 19, 2010, through 
January 31, 2013, all other workers of St. John Knits, Inc., Irvine, 
California, who became totally or partially separated from 
employment on or after November 3, 2009, through January 31, 2013, 
and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial 
separation from January 31, 2011 through January 31, 2013, are 
eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title 
II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 8th day of March 2011.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-6800 Filed 3-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### Chelrob, Inc., et al., Respondents and Appellants, and Mary Fries, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Edward F. Barrett et al., Appellants and Respondents, and Queens Borough Gas *&*Electric Company, Defendant-Respondent, Harry Tabershaw et al., Defendants-Appellants.

Opinion *Per Curiam*amended accordingly.

Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.
### §478a. Townsites

When the Secretary of Agriculture determines that a tract of National Forest System land in Alaska or in the eleven contiguous Western States is located adjacent to or contiguous to an established community, and that transfer of such land would serve indigenous community objectives that outweigh the public objectives and values which would be served by maintaining such tract in Federal ownership, he may, upon application, set aside and designate as a townsite an area of not to exceed six hundred and forty acres of National Forest System land for any one application. After public notice, and satisfactory showing of need therefor by any county, city, or other local governmental subdivision, the Secretary may offer such area for sale to a governmental subdivision at a price not less than the fair market value thereof: Provided, however, That the Secretary may condition conveyances of townsites upon the enactment, maintenance, and enforcement of a valid ordinance which assures any land so conveyed will be controlled by the governmental subdivision so that use of the area will not interfere with the protection, management, and development of adjacent or contiguous National Forest System lands.

(Pub. L. 85–569, July 31, 1958, 72 Stat. 438; Pub. L. 94–579, title II, §213, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2760.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is also set out as section 1012a of Title 7, Agriculture.

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–579 substituted provisions setting forth the procedures applicable to designation of townsites of tracts of National Forest System lands in Alaska or the eleven contiguous Western States for provisions setting forth the procedures applicable to designation of townsites from any national forest lands or lands administered by the Secretary of Agriculture under the Bankhead-Jones Farm Tenant Act.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Savings Provision

Amendment by Pub. L. 94–579 not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see note set out under section 1701 of Title 43, Public Lands.
### §470w–3. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 89–665, title III, §304, as added Pub. L. 96–515, title V, §501, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 3002; amended Pub. L. 102–575, title XL, §4020, Oct. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 4765, related to access to information. See section 307103 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
1

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Alexandria Division 

In re: )

)

THOMAS GIBSON JEWELL, ) Case No. 17-11625-KHK

) Chapter 11

Debtor. ) 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXPEDITE HEARING

Upon consideration of Dorothy M. Jewell’s Motion to Expedite Hearing (Docket No. 57), 

on her Motion for Relief From Stay (Docket No. 56), it is

ORDERED:

1. The motion to expedite hearing is granted, and a hearing on Dorothy M. Jewell’s

Motion for Relief From Stay (Docket No. 56), will be held on Wednesday, September 20, 

2017, at 11:00 a.m.LQ&RXUWURRP,,,EHIRUH-XGJH%ULDQ).HQQH\.

2. Written opposition, if any, must be filed by 5:00 p.m. on Monday, September 18,

2017.

3. Counsel for the Movant shall give notice of this hearing by close of business on

September 11, 2017.

4. The Clerk shall mail copies of this Order, or give electronic notice of its entry, to the

parties listed below. 

Date: ________________ _______________________________

Brian F. Kenney 

Alexandria, Virginia United States Bankruptcy Judge 

Sep 11 2017 /s/ Brian F. Kenney

Entered on Docket:September 12, 2017

Case 17-11625-KHK Doc 61 Filed 09/12/17 Entered 09/12/17 10:31:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
2

Copies to: 

Thomas Gibson Jewell

114 Chesterfield Place SW

Leesburg, VA 20175 

Chapter 11 Debtor 

Frank Bredimus, Esquire 

16960 Ivandale Rd. 

Hamilton, VA 20158 

Counsel for Chapter 11 Debtor 

Jack Frankel, Esquire 

Office of the U.S. Trustee 

115 South Union Street, Ste. 210 

Alexandria, VA 22314 

Counsel for the U.S. Trustee

$IPOH$1BSL
&TRVJSF

&4PVUI4USFFU
4&

-FFTCVSH
7"

$PVOTFMGPS%PSPUIZ.+FXFMM

Case 17-11625-KHK Doc 61 Filed 09/12/17 Entered 09/12/17 10:31:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
```

Exhibit 32.1
Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Liska Biometry, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lam Ko
Chau, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
          Company.

/s/ Lam Ko Chau
Lam Ko Chau, President (Principal Executive Officer), Chief Financial Officer
and Principal Accounting Officer

August 14, 2003
```
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 213 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 213

  Designating the week of May 19 through May 25, 2019, as ``National 
                          Public Works Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 16, 2019

    Mr. Inhofe (for himself and Ms. Harris) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                 May 23 (legislative day, May 22), 2019

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Designating the week of May 19 through May 25, 2019, as ``National 
                          Public Works Week''.

Whereas public works infrastructure, facilities, and services are of vital 
        importance to the health, safety, and well-being of the people of the 
        United States;
Whereas public works infrastructure, facilities, and services could not be 
        provided without the dedicated efforts of public works professionals, 
        including engineers and administrators, who represent State and local 
        governments throughout the United States;
Whereas public works professionals design, build, operate, and maintain the 
        transportation systems, water infrastructure, sewage and refuse disposal 
        systems, public buildings, and other structures and facilities that are 
        vital to the people and communities of the United States; and
Whereas understanding the role that public infrastructure plays in protecting 
        the environment, improving public health and safety, contributing to 
        economic vitality, and enhancing the quality of life of every community 
        of the United States is in the interest of the people of the United 
        States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the week of May 19 through May 25, 2019, as 
        ``National Public Works Week'';
            (2) recognizes and celebrates the important contributions 
        that public works professionals make every day to improve--
                    (A) the public infrastructure of the United States; 
                and
                    (B) the communities that public works professionals 
                serve; and
            (3) urges individuals and communities throughout the United 
        States to join with representatives of the Federal Government 
        and the American Public Works Association in activities and 
        ceremonies that are designed--
                    (A) to pay tribute to the public works 
                professionals of the United States; and
                    (B) to recognize the substantial contributions that 
                public works professionals make to the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 1003
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1003 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and at 68 FR 10350, Mar. 5, 2003.

§ 1003.64 Approval and denial of applications. ( a ) *Authority.* The Director in his discretion shall have the authority to approve or deny an application to be included on the List of Pro Bono Legal Service Providers. The Director may request additional information from the applicant to determine whether the applicant qualifies to be included on the List.
( b ) *Decision.* The applicant shall be notified of the decision in writing. The written notice shall be served at the address provided on the application unless the applicant subsequently provides a change of address pursuant to § 1003.66, or shall be transmitted to the applicant electronically. ( 1 ) *Denials.* If the application is denied, the applicant shall be given a written explanation of the grounds for such denial, and the decision shall be final. Such denial shall be without prejudice to file another application at any time after the next quarterly publication of the List.
( 2 ) *Approval and continuing qualification.* If the application is approved, the applicant's name will be included on the List at the next quarterly update. Every three years from the date of approval, a provider must file with the Director a declaration, under penalty of perjury, stating that the provider remains qualified to be included on the List under § 1003.62(a), (b), (c), or (d). For organizations and attorneys, the declaration must include alien registration numbers of clients in whose cases the provider rendered pro bono legal services under § 1003.62(a)(1), (b)(1), or (d)(2), representing at least 50 hours of pro bono legal services each year since the provider's most recent such declaration, or since the provider was included on the List, whichever was more recent. Organizations must provide, for each case listed, the name of the organization's attorneys or representatives who provided representation or other pro bono legal services, or the name of the attorney, representative, or organization the case was referred to for pro bono legal services. If a provider fails to timely file the declaration or declares that it is no longer qualified to be included on the List, the provider's name will be removed from the List at the next quarterly update. Failure to file a declaration within the applicable time period does not prohibit the filing of a new application to be included on the List.
[80 FR 59512, Oct. 1, 2015, as amended at 86 FR 70723, Dec. 13, 2021]