alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Served: December 27 , 2011

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

 WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 27th day of December, 2011

Docket DOT-OST-2000-6773

NOTICE OF PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION

AND DEADLINE FOR ANSWERS

By this Notice, the Department is informing all interested persons of Pacific Wings, 

LLC’s (“Pacific Wings”) petition to reconsider Order 2011-11-27, in which Schuman 

Aviation Company Ltd. d/b/a Makani Kai Air Charters was selected to provide 

subsidized Essential Air Service at Kalaupapa, Hawaii. Pacific Wings filed its petition 

for reconsideration on December 22, 2011.

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 302.14(a)(2), any party to this proceeding may file an answer in 

support of or in opposition to a petition for reconsideration within ten (10) days after such 

petition has been filed. In light of the holiday season and significant community interest 

in Order 2011-11-27, the Department requests that all answers be submitted by Thursday, 

January 19, 2012. 

All answers should be emailed to Dennis DeVany at Dennis.DeVany@dot.gov and to

EAS@dot.gov with the subject line entitled “Answer to Pacific Wings’ Petition for 

Reconsideration.” Our staff will ensure that all answers may be accessed online via the 

Essential Air Service at

KALAUPAPA, HAWAII

under 49 U.S.C. 41731 et seq.
2

Federal Docket Management System at http://www.regulations.gov through a search on 

Docket Number DOT-OST-2000-6773. 

Questions regarding answers may be directed to Brian Swanson at (202) 366-5392.

By:

SUSAN L. KURLAND

Assistant Secretary for Aviation

and International Affairs

(SEAL)

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at:

http://www.regulations.gov/
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report of The SCO Group, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q, for the three months ended January 31, 2004, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Robert K. Bench, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

1.                                       The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| By:    | /s/ Robert K. Bench     |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert K. Bench         |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                    |
|   |                    |
| Date:  | March 16, 2004     |

 

----
### §467a–1. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–586, §4(a)(1), (b), Dec. 23, 1980, 94 Stat. 3386

Section, Pub. L. 92–527, §2, Oct. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 1049, established the Mar-A-Lago National Historic Site Advisory Commission and provided for its membership, term of office, designation of a Chairman, filling of vacancies, compensation and expenses, consultations on general policies and specific matters related to administration of the site, and voting.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

For effective date of repeal, see Pub. L. 96–586, §4, Dec. 23, 1980, 94 Stat. 3386, set out as a note under section 467a of this title.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 8

Ref: 8P-AR Mr. Steven A. Dietrich 1595 Wynkoop Street DENVER, CO 80202-1129 Phone 800-227-8917 http://www
.epa.gov/region08


### SEP 2**~** 2015
Administrator, Air Quality Division Department ofEnvironmental Quality Herschler Building 122 West 25th Street Cheyenne, Wyoming 82002 Dear Mr. Dietrich: Thank you for submitting the 2015 Wyoming Annual Monitoring Network Plan (AMNP) dated 2015. The final AMNP was received by Region 8 on July 2, 2015, as an attachmentto your letter. Region 8 has reviewed the submitted AMNP and found that the requirements specified in 40 CFR Part 58.10, as well as the 105 grant commitment to conduct a review annually, have been met with the submission ofthis document. Ifyou have any questions on this issue, please contact me at (303) 312-6416 or Albion Carlson, ofmy staff, at (303) 312-6207.

cc: Cara Keslar WY DEQ Sincerely, 

## l :~· . ....."' •, 1 

# 'l I 

## (_
.

/a:
. )-·· Carl Daly, Director Air Program I
#### § 1340.2 Applicability.

This part applies to State surveys of seat belt use beginning in calendar year 2013 and continuing annually thereafter. However, a State may elect to conduct its calendar year 2012 seat belt use survey using a survey design approved under this part.

[77 FR 20551, Apr. 5, 2012]
### §470v–1. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 89–665, title II, §215, as added Pub. L. 104–333, div. I, title V, §509(c)(3), Nov. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 4157, related to reimbursements from State and local agencies. See section 304111 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
#### John Killbasa, Respondent, v. American Malleables Company, Appellant.

Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied, with ten doUars costs.
§ 83.205 What must I include in my drug-free workplace statement? You must publish a statement that— ( a ) Tells your employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in your workplace;
( b ) Specifies the actions that you will take against employees for violating that prohibition; and
( c ) Lets each employee know that, as a condition of employment under any award, he or she: ( 1 ) Will abide by the terms of the statement; and
( 2 ) Must notify you in writing if he or she is convicted for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace and must do so no more than five calendar days after the conviction.
# C_2012258EN.01001802.xml

| 25.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 258/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 258/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2012 — Pharmazeutische Fabrik Evers v OHIM — Ozone Laboratories Pharma (HYPOCHOL)

(Case T-517/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark HYPOCHOL - Earlier national figurative mark HITRECHOL - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2012/C 258/31

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Pharmazeutische Fabrik Evers GmbH & Co. KG (Pinneberg, Germany) (represented by: R. Kaase and R. Möller, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Ozone Laboratories Pharma SA (București, Romania)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 September 2010 (Case R 1332/2009-4), concerning opposition proceedings between Pharmazeutische Fabrik Evers GmbH & Co. KG and Ozone Laboratories Pharma SA

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Pharmazeutische Fabrik Evers GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Pharmazeutische Fabrik Evers GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 13, 15.1.2011.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,025
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,025
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,025
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        (157,550)
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       (3,000)
<OTHER-SE>                                     156,525
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,025
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   164
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   98,823
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (98,659)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (98,659)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)


</TABLE>
### §5006. Administration and enforcement of Convention

#### (a) Responsibilities

The Secretary of Commerce shall be responsible for administering provisions of the Convention, this chapter, and regulations issued under this chapter. The Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Commerce and the Secretary of Transportation, shall be responsible for coordinating the participation of the United States in the Commission.

#### (b) Consultation and cooperation

In carrying out such functions, the Secretary of Commerce—

(1) shall, in consultation with the Secretary of Transportation and the United States Section, issue such regulations as may be necessary to carry out the purposes and objectives of the Convention and this chapter; and

(2) may, with the concurrence of the Secretary, cooperate with the authorized officials of the government of any Party.

(Pub. L. 102–567, title VIII, §807, Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4311; Pub. L. 102–587, title VIII, §8007, Nov. 4, 1992, 106 Stat. 5101; Pub. L. 106–562, title III, §304(a), Dec. 23, 2000, 114 Stat. 2806.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Title VIII of Pub. L. 102–567 and Pub. L. 102–587 enacted identical sections. Title VIII of Pub. L. 102–587 was repealed by Pub. L. 106–562.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

ANTHONY CLARK,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Appellee.

§

§ 

§ No. 260, 2023

§

§ Court Below: Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ Cr. ID No. 1709012825 (K)

§ 

§

§

Submitted: December 4, 2023

Decided: December 12, 2023

ORDER

(1) On July 24, 2023, the appellant, Anthony Clark, filed a notice of appeal 

from a Superior Court order sentencing him for a violation of probation. The Court 

issued a briefing schedule on August 30, 2023; Clark’s opening brief was due

September 29, 2023. The appellant later requested a thirty-day extension, which the 

Court granted. On November 1, 2023, Court staff sent a notice of brief delinquency 

to Clark because he had not filed his opening brief by the deadline. The notice was 

returned to the Court because Clark had been released from prison. Court staff 

obtained a new mailing address for Clark from the Department of Correction and 

reissued the notice of brief delinquency; the postal service returned that notice as 

undeliverable.
2

(2) On November 16, 2023, after confirming that the Department of 

Correction did not have an alternative address for Clark, Court staff issued a notice, 

sent by certified mail, directing Clark to show cause why this appeal should not be 

dismissed for his failure to file an opening brief. On November 21, 2023, the postal 

service returned the notice to show cause as undeliverable. Court staff resent the 

notice by first-class mail; the notice was again returned.

(3) The appellant having failed to respond to the notice to show cause, to 

file the opening brief, or to report any address change to the Court, dismissal of this 

action is deemed unopposed. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the appeal is DISMISSED under 

Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(b).

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Abigail M. LeGrow 

Justice
#### Samuel Green, Respondent, v. John W. Stevens, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
### §567. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–313, §16(a)(1), formerly §13(a)(1), July 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 374; renumbered §16(a)(1), Pub. L. 101–624, title XII, §1215(1), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3525

Section, acts June 7, 1924, ch. 348, §4, 43 Stat. 654; Oct. 26, 1949, ch. 735, §2, 63 Stat. 909, required cooperation between Secretary of Agriculture and States in procuring, etc., forest-tree seeds and plants.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1978, see section 17 of Pub. L. 95–313, set out as an Effective Date note under section 2101 of this title.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of BlastGard International, Inc., that, to his knowledge, the amended Quarterly Report of the company on
Form 10-QSB/A-1 for the period ended March 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the companys financial condition and results of operations.



July 13,
2005



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael J. Gordon                     
|Michael J. Gordon, Chief Financial Officer
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
  
 
 
   (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ John J. Greisch
      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 17-03130-KRH Doc 5 Filed 05/08/17 Entered 05/09/17 14:13:04 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 17-03130-KRH Doc 5 Filed 05/08/17 Entered 05/09/17 14:13:04 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
§ 660.111 Agreements. ( a ) A statewide FH agreement shall be executed among the FHWA, the FS, and each SHA. This agreement shall set forth the responsibilities of each party, including that of adherence to the applicable provisions of Federal and State statutes and regulations.
( b ) The design and construction of FH projects will be administered by the FHWA unless otherwise provided for in an agreement approved under this subpart.
( c ) A project agreement shall be entered into between the FHWA and the cooperator involved under one or more of the following conditions: ( 1 ) A cooperator's funds are to be made available for the project or any portion of the project;
( 2 ) Federal funds are to be made available to a cooperator for any work;
( 3 ) Special circumstances exist which make a project agreement necessary for payment purposes or to clarify any aspect of the project; or
( 4 ) It is necessary to document jurisdiction and maintenance responsibility.
#### § 636.206 How do I evaluate offerors who do not have a record of relevant past performance?

In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance.
is your superpower !

www.cdc.gov/handwashing CS294906-E

PN300508
§ 657.11 Evaluation of operations. ( a ) The State shall submit its enforcement plan or annual update to the FHWA Division Office by July 1 of each year. However, if a State's legislative or budgetary cycle is not consonant with that date, the FHWA and the State may jointly select an alternate date. In any event, a State must have an approved plan in effect by October 1 of each year. Failure of a State to submit or update a plan will result in the State being unable to certify in accordance with § 657.13 for the period to be covered by the plan.
( b ) The FHWA shall review the State's operation under the accepted plan on a continuing basis and shall prepare an evaluation report annually. The State will be advised of the results of the evaluation and of any needed changes in the plan itself or in its implementation. Copies of the evaluation reports and subsequent modifications resulting from the evaluation shall be forwarded to the FHWA's Office of Operations.
[59 FR 30418, June 13, 1994, as amended at 72 FR 7747, Feb. 20, 2007]
### §537. Maintenance and reconstruction by road users; funds for maintenance and reconstruction; availability of deposits until expended, transfer of funds, and refunds

The Secretary may require the user or users of a road under the control of the Forest Service, including purchasers of Government timber and other products, to maintain such roads in a satisfactory condition commensurate with the particular use requirements of each. Such maintenance to be borne by each user shall be proportionate to total use. The Secretary may also require the user or users of such a road to reconstruct the same when such reconstruction is determined to be necessary to accommodate such use. If such maintenance or reconstruction cannot be so provided or if the Secretary determines that maintenance or reconstruction by a user would not be practical, then the Secretary may require that sufficient funds be deposited by the user to provide his portion of such total maintenance or reconstruction. Deposits made to cover the maintenance or reconstruction of roads are hereby made available until expended to cover the cost to the United States of accomplishing the purpose for which deposited: Provided, That deposits received for work on adjacent and overlapping areas may be combined when it is the most practicable and efficient manner of performing the work, and cost thereof may be determined by estimates: And provided further, That unexpended balances upon accomplishment of the purpose for which deposited shall be transferred to miscellaneous receipts or refunded.

(Pub. L. 88–657, §6, Oct. 13, 1964, 78 Stat. 1090.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of certain enforcement functions of Secretary or other official in Department of Agriculture under sections 532 to 538 of this title to Federal Inspector, Office of Federal Inspector for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System, and subsequent transfer to Secretary of Energy, then to Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Projects, see Transfer of Functions note set out under section 533 of this title.
Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America
1750 Hennepin Avenue
Minneapolis, MN  55403
(612) 347-6500

May 5, 2000

VIA EDGAR

_________

Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Investment Management
Office of Insurance Products
450 Fifth Street N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

     RE:     Allianz Life Variable Account B
             File No.  33-23035
             ________________________________

Dear Sir/Madam:

Pursuant to Securities  Act Rule 497(j),  we hereby  certify that the Prospectus
and  Statement of Additional  Information  that would have been filed under Rule
497(c) does not differ  from that  contained  in the most recent  Post-effective
Amendment, which Amendment has been filed electronically.

If you  have  any  questions  or  comments,  please  feel  free to  contact  the
undersigned.


Sincerely,

Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America


By:  /s/  Catherine L. Mielke
    ________________________________
          Catherine L. Mielke
### §450u. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Mar. 19, 1936, ch. 157, §1, 49 Stat. 1184, which established The Homestead National Monument of America, was transferred to section 410gggg of this title.
1

Farm, Ranch, and Rural Communities

Federal Advisory Committee

Teleconference Agenda

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

2:00 p.m. – 4:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time

1201 Constitution Ave, NW

EPA East Building, Room 1132

Washington, DC 20004

AGENDA

Purpose: To discuss and approve Draft Land Use White Paper for submission to 

EPA Administrator.

2:00 p.m. Welcome, Introductions, and Overview of Agenda

 Jim Moseley, Chair, FRRCC

2:05 Ground Rules for Teleconference

 Alicia Kaiser, Designated Federal Officer, FRRCC

2:10 Overview of Draft Land Use White Paper and Comments Received 

from Committee members

 Ralph Grossi, Chair, Emerging Issues Workgroup, FRRCC

2:25 Public Comments on Draft Land Use White Paper

2:40 Discussion and Approval of Draft Land Use White Paper

 Ralph Grossi, Chair, Emerging Issues Workgroup, FRRCC

3:10 ADJOURN

 Jim Moseley, Chair, FRRCC

 Alicia Kaiser, Designated Federal Officer, FRRCC