alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §162. Control; regulations; leases; sale and removal of timber

Glacier National Park shall be under the exclusive control of the Secretary of the Interior, whose duties it shall be, as soon as practicable, to make and publish such rules and regulations not inconsistent with the laws of the United States as he may deem necessary or proper for the care, protection, management, and improvement of the same, which regulations shall provide for the preservation of the park in a state of nature so far as is consistent with the purposes of this section and section 161 of this title, and for the care and protection of the fish and game within the boundaries thereof. Said Secretary may, in his discretion, execute leases to parcels of ground not exceeding ten acres in extent at any one place to any one person or company, for not to exceed twenty years, when such ground is necessary for the erection of buildings for the accommodation of visitors, and to parcels of ground not exceeding one acre in extent and for not to exceed twenty years to persons who have heretofore erected or whom he may hereafter authorize to erect summer homes or cottages; he may also sell and permit the removal of such matured,1 or dead or down timber as he may deem necessary or advisable for the protection or improvement of the park.

(May 11, 1910, ch. 226, §2, 36 Stat. 354.)

1 So in original.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 98/2005

of 20 January 2005         

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the import of sorghum issued in Regulation (EC) No 2275/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003, on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 12(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 14 to 20 January 2005 in response to the invitation to tender for the reduction in the duty on imported sorghum issued in Regulation (EC) No 2275/2004.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 21 January 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 January 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 396, 31.12.2004, p. 32.

(3)OJ L 177, 28.7.1995, p. 4. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

----
### §590i–2. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act July 2, 1942, ch. 473, 56 Stat. 508 (the Department of the Interior Appropriation Act, 1943), which related to furnishing photographs, mosaics, and maps required in soil conservation operations of the Department of the Interior, was not repeated in subsequent appropriation acts. Similar provision was contained in prior appropriation act of June 28, 1941, ch. 259, 55 Stat. 306.
### §460xx–1. Management

#### (a) General authorities

The Secretary shall manage the conservation area in a manner that conserves, protects, and enhances the riparian area and the aquatic, wildlife, archeological, paleontological, scientific, cultural, educational, and recreational resources of the conservation area. Such management shall be guided by this subchapter and, where not inconsistent with this subchapter, by the provisions of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 [43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.] (hereinafter in this subchapter referred to as "FLPMA").

#### (b) Uses

The Secretary shall only allow such uses of the conservation area as he finds will further the primary purposes for which the conservation area is established. Except where needed for administrative or emergency purposes, the use of motorized vehicles in the conservation area shall only be allowed on roads specifically designated for such use as part of the management plan prepared pursuant to section 460xx–2 of this title. The Secretary shall have the power to implement such reasonable limits to visitation and use of the conservation area as he finds appropriate for the protection of the resources of the conservation area, including requiring permits for public use, or closing portions of the conservation area to public use.

#### (c) Withdrawals

Subject to valid existing rights, all Federal lands within the conservation area are hereby withdrawn from all forms of entry, appropriation, or disposal under the public land laws; from location, entry, and patent under the United States mining laws; and from disposition under all laws pertaining to mineral and geothermal leasing and all amendments thereto.

#### (d) Water rights

Congress reserves for the purposes of this reservation, a quantity of water sufficient to fulfill the purposes of the San Pedro Riparian National Conservation Area created by this subchapter. The priority date of such reserve rights shall be November 18, 1988. The Secretary shall file a claim for the quantification of such rights in an appropriate stream adjudication.

#### (e) Enforcement

Any person who violates any provision of this subchapter or any regulation promulgated by the Secretary to implement this subchapter shall be subject to a fine of up to $10,000, or imprisonment for up to one year, or both.

(Pub. L. 100–696, title I, §102, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4571.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 94–579, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2743, which is classified principally to chapter 35 (§1701 et seq.) of Title 43, Public Lands. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1701 of Title 43 and Tables.
---

CERTIFICATION OF 
  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dennis Petke, Chief Financial Officer and Acting Chief
  Executive Officer of Aucxis Corp. (the “Company”), hereby certify
  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company,
        for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Report”) fully complies
        with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                             

| | By:    | /s/ Dennis Petke              
| | ------ | ------------------------------
| |        |                               
| | Name:  | DENNIS PETKE                  
| |        |                               
| | Title: | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER       
| |        | ACTING CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
| |        |                               
| | Date:  | August 17, 2005               

---
!" #$  $

 $!% &

	"	'  $

  $()*+),-./+


0 (  $



	









 
!"#$
%
&(
)




$%*)
&(
+#,-
..

/00	/1



+

+#



.


#+



.


2
#

.
.








.


#

*		.



+#
	

#





-

3444444444444444444.567

4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444

(
(1

   
23% 41536

Mar 22 2017 /s/ Brian F. Kenney

Entered on Docket:Mar 23 2017

Case 16-10548-BFK Doc 137 Filed 03/23/17 Entered 03/23/17 10:16:42 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
	2#!$

889
-*++

9
-*++.:!; 66<=

/	>?**//@@.0--

 66/-A




56B

+2
.:55 B

$76 (CB<D566

$76 (CB<D56C	



"E
#+F-

+,-
.

074 $

88,
,-*++

5!5(8'5(

=69



B66

+2
.:55 B

$76 (CBGD56<5

))+FE+-

+	

#

2

Case 16-10548-BFK Doc 137 Filed 03/23/17 Entered 03/23/17 10:16:42 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Duane K. HAUSEUR, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 01-30314. D.C. No. CR-01-00053-WFN.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 7, 2002 *.

Decided May 9, 2002.

Before RYMER, McKEOWN and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Duane Hauseur appeals his conviction after his conditional guilty plea to one count of attempted manufacture of methamphetamine, one count of possession of heroin with intent to deliver, one count of possession of methamphetamine, one count of being an unlawful user of a controlled substance in possession of a firearm, and one count of being an unlawful user of a controlled substance in possession of ammunition, 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 844 and 846; 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.

Under the totality of circumstances, the officers had a reasonable suspicion that Hauseur and his passenger, Brian Pagano, were engaged in criminal activity. Hauseur and Pagano had purchased an unusually large quantity of iodine — a chemical commonly used to manufacture methamphetamine — were using a rental car, and drove to a location known for the manufacture and distribution of methamphetamine. Additionally, the officers discovered that the name Pagano had used to purchase the iodine corresponded with an outstanding arrest warrant for felony drug offenses. Thus there was no Fourth Amendment violation in the initial investigatory stop of Hauseur and Pagano. *See United States v. Arvizu,*534 U.S. 266, 122 S.Ct. 744, 750, 151 L.Ed.2d 740 (2002); *United States v. Sokolow,*490 U.S. 1, 7, 109 S.Ct. 1581, 104 L.Ed.2d 1 (1989).

Nor did the officers violate the Fourth Amendment by continuing the stop after learning that Pagano was not the suspect wanted under the felony warrant. The *373officers still had a reasonable suspicion that Hauseur and Pagano were attempting to manufacture methamphetamine, a suspicion which was, if anything, heightened by the officers’ discovery that Pagano had given a false name when purchasing the iodine. The investigative detention lasted “no longer than [was] necessary to effectuate the purpose of the stop.” *Florida v. Royer,*460 U.S. 491, 500, 103 S.Ct. 1319, 75 L.Ed.2d 229 (1983).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Walnut  Valley  Ventures,
Inc.,  on Form  10-QSB for the  period  ending  June 30,  2002 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the
undersigned, B. Stephen Bailey, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
cc: Jason S. Tucker Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney 2
1 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

Richmond Division 

In re: David G. Lambert and Case No. 15-36520-KLP 

 Brenda L. Lambert, Chapter 13 

 Debtors 

ORDER 

 A hearing was held on March 2, 2016, on the motion filed by Andrew J. 

Holick for the dismissal of the chapter 13 bankruptcy case of Debtors David 

G. Lambert and Brenda L. Lambert. Holick, a creditor in the case, had 

argued that the case had been filed in bad faith. At the hearing, the Court 

heard argument and the evidence presented by the parties and ruled from 

the bench that the motion to dismiss would be denied. Therefore, for the 

reasons announced in open court, 

 IT IS ORDERED that the motion to dismiss filed by Andrew J. Holick 

is DENIED. 

Signed: March 3, 2016 

 /s/ Keith L. Phillips 

 United States Bankruptcy Judge 

Copies: 

David G. Lambert 

202 East Brookland Park Blvd. 

Richmond, VA 23222 

Brenda L. Lambert 

202 East Brookland Park Blvd. 

Richmond, VA 23222 

Entered on Docket: March 3, 2016

Case 15-36520-KLP Doc 33 Filed 03/03/16 Entered 03/03/16 10:39:19 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
2 

Suzanne E. Wade 

P.O. Box 1780 

Richmond, VA 23218-1780 

Pia J. North 

North Law 

5913 Harbour Park Drive 

Midlothian, VA 23112 

Andrew J. Holick 

8907 Royal Birkdale Drive 

Chesterfield, VA 23832 

Case 15-36520-KLP Doc 33 Filed 03/03/16 Entered 03/03/16 10:39:19 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
### §459d–1. Acquisition of property

#### (a) Authority of Secretary; manner and place; concurrence of State owner; transfer from Federal agency to administrative jurisdiction of Secretary

The Secretary of the Interior (hereinafter referred to as the "Secretary") is authorized to acquire by donation, purchase with donated or appropriated funds, condemnation, transfer from any Federal agency, exchange, or otherwise, the land, waters, and other property, and improvements thereon and any interest therein, within the areas described in section 459d of this title or which lie within the boundaries of the seashore as established under section 459d–2 of this title (hereinafter referred to as "such area"). Any property, or interest therein, owned by the State of Texas or political subdivision thereof may be acquired only with the concurrence of such owner. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any Federal property located within such area may, with the concurrence of the agency having custody thereof, be transferred without consideration to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary for use by him in carrying out the provisions of sections 459d to 459d–7 of this title.

#### (b) Fair market value; appraisal

The Secretary is authorized to pay for any acquisitions which he makes by purchase under sections 459d to 459d–7 of this title their fair market value, as determined by the Secretary, who may in his discretion base his determination on an independent appraisal obtained by him.

#### (c) Exchange of property; cash equalization payments

In exercising his authority to acquire property by exchange, the Secretary may accept title to any non-Federal property located within such area and convey to the grantor of such property any federally owned property under the jurisdiction of the Secretary within such area. The properties so exchanged shall be approximately equal in fair market value: Provided, That the Secretary may accept cash from or pay cash to the grantor in such an exchange in order to equalize the values of the properties exchanged.

(Pub. L. 87–712, §2, Sept. 28, 1962, 76 Stat. 650.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Revision of Boundaries; Addition and Deletion of Acreage

Pub. L. 94–578, title I, §101(13), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2733, as amended Pub. L. 96–199, title I, §111, Mar. 5, 1980, 94 Stat. 70, provided in part that: "The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to revise the boundary of the seashore [Padre Island National Seashore, Texas] to add approximately two hundred and seventy-four acres and to delete approximately two thousand acres, and sections 302 and 303 of the Act of April 11, 1972 (86 Stat. 120, 121) [Pub. L. 92–272, which sections were not classified to the Code], shall apply to the boundary revision authorized herein."
----

----

1

----

  

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

|   | If to the Fund: |
|--------|-----------------|

----

----

----

----

----

----

|   | Company: |
|--------|----------|

----

----

| Separate Accounts | Products |
|-------------------|----------|
|              |     |
|              |     |
|              |     |
|              |     |
|              |     |
|              |     |
|              |     |
|              |     |
|              |     |
|              |     |
|              |     |
|              |     |
|              |     |
|              |     |
|              |     |
|              |     |
|              |     |
|              |     |

----

| Trust Name                                | Fund Name/Class                                                      | CUSIP     |
|-------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|
| Legg Mason Partners Variable Equity Trust | Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class II | 52467X872 |
| Legg Mason Partners Variable Equity Trust | Legg Mason Dynamic Multi-Strategy VIT Portfolio Class II             | 52467M785 |

----
Motion Granted and Order filed August 12, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-13-00711-CV

____________

IN RE ULLICO CASUALTY COMPANY, ET AL., Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

23rd District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 60307

O R D E R

On August 9, 2013, relators, Ullico Casualty Company, et al., filed a petition 

for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221. Relator asks 

this court to order the Honorable Ben Hardin, Judge of 23rd District Court, in 

Brazoria County, Texas, to set aside his order dated August 5, 2013, entered in trial 

court cause number 60307, styled Charlene Hembree, et al. v.Thermal Polymer 

System, LC, et al. Relators claim respondent abused his discretion by denying their 

opposed emergency motion for entry of an order confirming stay of all proceedings. 

Relator has also filed a motion for a temporary stay of proceedings below. See
Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(b), 52.10. On August 9, 2013, relators asked this court to stay 

proceedings in the trial court pending a decision on the petition for writ of 

mandamus.

It appears from the facts stated in the petition and motion that relators’ request 

for relief requires further consideration and that relators will be prejudiced unless 

immediate temporary relief is granted. We therefore GRANT relators’ motion and 

issue the following order:

We ORDER all proceedings in trial court cause number 60307, styled 

Charlene Hembree, et al. v.Thermal Polymer System, LC, et al. STAYED until a 

final decision by this court on relators’ petition for writ of mandamus, or until 

further order of this court. 

In addition, the court requests Matthiesen, Wicker & Lehrer, S.C. and Kelly, 

Smith & Murrah, P.C., the real parties-in-interest, to file a response to the petition 

for writ of mandamus on or before August 26, 2013. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.4. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Brown, Busby, and Donovan.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        12,044,712
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                       12,044,712
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                         12,385,547
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              12,675,547
<CASH>                                       1,362,807
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              25,576
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       4,013,804
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,137,804
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             10,820,386
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            480,311
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 444,522
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           36,741
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,647,285
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,072,695
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,137,804
<PREMIUMS>                                   6,284,099
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            778,276
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                   3,453,126
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    694,256
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         2,685,482
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                229,511
<INCOME-TAX>                                    39,017
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            190,494
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   190,494
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     $.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     $.35
<RESERVE-OPEN>                               1,782,881
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                          1,367,541
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                               82,770
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                             1,117,964
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                              2,115,228
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of NorAm Capital Holdings, Inc. (Registrant) for the annual period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Anthony J. Renteria, Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1)

This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Registrant.











|                   |                                                           |                        
|------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------
|Date: May 28, 2010 | By:                                                       | /s/ Anthony J. Renteria
|                   | Anthony J. Renteria
President and Chief Executive Officer