alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Robert L. Bauman, Chief Executive Officer               

  I, Robert L. Bauman, Chief Executive Officer,            certify that:   
      -    I have reviewed this annual report on            Form 10-KSB of Hickok Incorporated (the "registrant");    
      -    Based on my knowledge, this annual report            does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit   to   state      a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in   light   of the   circumstances   under which such statements were made, not  misleading   with   respect to the   period covered by this annual report;        
      -    Based on my knowledge, the financial   statements, and other financial information included in this annual report,   fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results  of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods  presented in this annual report;  
      -    The registrant's other certifying officer            and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure    controls        and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)    and 15d-15(e))  for    the  registrant and have:    a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures,  or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating    to the registrant,         including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made   known to us by others      within   those entities, particularly during  the  period in which this  annual    report   is being prepared;         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the            registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin   this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures,   as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation;    and         c) Disclosed in this annual report any    change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially     affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's    internal control over financial reporting; and  
      -    The registrant's other certifying officer            and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant's        auditorsand    the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or personsperforming    the equivalent functions):          a) All significant deficiencies and material    weaknesses in the         design or operation of internal control over financial   reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant's   ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and         b) Any fraud, whether or not material,            that involves management or other employees who have a significant     role     in  the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

 By: 

 /s/ R. L. Bauman 

 R. L. Bauman   

 Chief Executive Officer   

 December 21, 2005
.

July 9, 1970

Hon. W. C. Lindsey Criminal District Attorney Jefferson **County Courthouse**  Beaumont, Texas
Dear Mr. Lindsey: Opinion No.M-657
**Re:** Proper official tomake delivery of county warrants and jury checks to the payee.
Your request for our opinion asks the following question: 'Which county official or officials **are** authorized todeliver/mail county **warrants** and county jury checks to the.payee?" Article 2122, Vernon's Civil Statutes, states that jurors' pay is tobe made by a check drawn by the clerk of the district court of the county on the jury fund. Article 2554, Vernon's Civil Statutes, provides inpart as follows:

"It shall be the duty of the county treasurer upon thepresentation tohim of anywarrant, check, voucher, or order drawn by theproper authority, ifthere be funds sufficient for thepayment thereof on deposit in the account against which suchwarrant isdrawn, to endorse upon the face of such instrument his order topay the same to the payee named therein and to charge the same onhis books to the fund upon which it isdrawn. ..." Article 1632, Vernon's Civil Statutes, declares that,

-3146-Hon. W. C. Lindsey, page 2 (M -657)
"The county treasurer or any other officer disbursing **money** for the county, or receiving county claims inpayment ofdues of anykind, shall require the party receiving payment of, or credit for the same, his agent or attorney, to receipt in writing upon the face of such claim for the amount sopaid or received thereon." (Emphasis added.) Article 1709, Vernon's Civil Statutes, provides as follows: "The county treasurer shall receive all moneys belonging to thecounty fromwhatever source they may be derived, andpay and apply the same as required by law, in such manner as the commissioners court ofhis county may require and direct." (Emphasis added.) The above statutes, by necessary implication, authorize the county treasurer tomake delivery of suchwarrants. Inview of the foregoing, we agree with you that the county treasurer is the proper official tomake delivery of county warrants to thepayee. SUMMARY

The county treasurer is the proper official authorized tomake delivery of countywarrants to the payee. /

C.MARTIN General of Texas Prepared by John Reeves Assistant Attorney General

-'J147-. Hon. W. C. Lindsey, page 3 (M-657)

APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE Kerns Taylor, Chairman W. E.Allen, Co-Chairman Milton Richardson Lehman Marks Malcom Smith Dan Green MEADE F. GRIFFIN Staff Legal Assistant ALFRED WALKER Executive Assistant NOLAWHITE First Assistant

-3146-
#### William Cohen Fabrics Corporation v. Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank.

Present—Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
### §556b. Use of appropriations for expenses of transporting automobiles of employees between points in Alaska

Funds available to the Forest Service may be used, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Agriculture for expenses of transporting automobiles of employees of that Service between points in Alaska in connection with transfers of official stations of such employees to meet the needs of the Service.

(Pub. L. 85–464, §3, June 20, 1958, 72 Stat. 217.)
### §460l–2. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 88–29, §3, May 28, 1963, 77 Stat. 50, related to consultations of Secretary of the Interior with administrative officers. See section 200104 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
Exhibit 10.23

AMENDMENT 2002-3        HILTON HOTELS RETIREMENT PLAN

WHEREAS, Hilton Hotels Corporation (the "Company") maintains the Hilton Hotels Retirement Plan (the "Plan"); and

WHEREAS,
it is necessary that the Plan be amended to reflect certain provisions of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Recovery Act of 2001 and to reflect final and temporary IRS
regulations regarding required minimum distributions under Section 401(a)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code; and

WHEREAS,
the Board of Directors of the Company has granted the Hilton Hotels Pension and Thrift Committee (the "Committee") the authority to adopt amendments to the Plan on behalf of the
Company and all Participating Affiliates (as defined in the Plan), which amendment authority is reflected in Section 8.1 of the Plan.

NOW,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by virtue and in exercise of the power reserved to the Company and the Committee by Section 8.1 of the Plan, the Plan, as previously amended, be
and is hereby further amended, effective as of January 1, 2002 unless otherwise noted, in the following particulars:

*
* *

"APPENDIX
G
AMENDMENT OF THE PLAN FOR EGTRRA
PREAMBLE



---



2

---



3

---



"APPENDIX
H
MINIMUM DISTRIBUTION REQUIREMENTS



4

---



5

---



6

---



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this amendment to be signed on its behalf by its duly authorized officer as of the 18th day of December, 2002.

| |  | HILTON HOTELS CORPORATION
| |  | -------------------------
| |  | By:                      
| |  |                          
| |  | Its:                     
| |  |                          

7

---

QuickLinks
#### W. E. Gerrard v. State of Nebraska.

Filed April 2, 1902.

No. 12,476.

Occupation Tax: Peddlers: Revenue Law. The provisions of the g-eneral revenue law imposing an occupation tax upon peddlers were enacted by the legislature in the exercise of its taxing power and are valid.

Error from the district court for Hall county. Tried below before Thompson, J. Holcomb, J., dissenting.

Affirmed.

O. *M. Quackenbush*and *W. A. Prince,*for plaintiff in error.

*Frank N. Prout, Attorney General, Norris Broton, Deputy,*and *R. 11. Horth,*for the state. .

Sullivan, C. J.

W. E. Gerrard, having been convicted in the district court of Hall county of peddling without a license, brings the record of his conviction to this court for review. All the questions discussed by counsel have been decided in *Rosenbloom v. State,*64 Nebr., 342, in which we held that the provisions of the general revenue law imposing an occupation tax upon peddlers were enacted by the legislature in the exercise of its taxing power and are valid. This case is ruled by the *Rosenbloom Gase.*

The judgment is

Affirmed,

Holcomb, J., dissents.
### §410nnn. Findings

The Congress finds that:

(1) The study conducted by the National Park Service under section 506(b) of Public Law 95–625 has resulted in a precise identification of the location of the Battle of Palo Alto and the area requiring protection.

(2) Palo Alto is the only unit of the National Park System directed to the preservation and interpretation of resources related to the Mexican-American War.

(Pub. L. 102–304, §2, June 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 256.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 506(b) of Pub. L. 95–625, referred to in par. (1), is set out as a note under section 410nnn–1 of this title.

#### Codification

This subchapter is comprised of Pub. L. 102–304. Pub. L. 102–304 is also listed in a table of National Historic Sites set out under section 320101 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 102–304, §1, June 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 256, as amended by Pub. L. 111–11, title VII, §7113(a)(3)(A), Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1201, provided that: "This Act [enacting this subchapter] may be cited as the 'Palo Alto Battlefield National Historical Park Act of 1991'."

#### Designation of Palo Alto Battlefield National Historical Park

Pub. L. 111–11, title VII, §7113(a)(1), (2), Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1201, provided that:

"(1) In general.—The Palo Alto Battlefield National Historic Site shall be known and designated as the 'Palo Alto Battlefield National Historical Park'.

"(2) References.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the historic site referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Palo Alto Battlefield National Historical Park."
December 30, 1999


ComVest Capital Management LLC
830 Third Avenue
New York, NY  10022

         Re:      Advancement of Funds

Gentlemen:

     Reference is made to that certain Commitment Letter dated December 30, 1999
(the "Letter")  between  ComVest  Capital  Management LLC  ("ComVest")  and U.S.
Wireless  Data,  Inc. (the  "Company").  Capitalized  terms used herein  without
definition are used as defined or referred to in the Letter.

     This  letter is to  confirm  that I, as a lender,  will  subject to ComVest
first having funded $195,000 under the Letter, advance funds to the Company in a
proportionate  amount to that funded to the  Company by ComVest  pursuant to the
Letter.  For each $1 advanced by ComVest after such initial $195,000 is advanced
I will advance a fraction of such dollar,  the numerator of which is 100 and the
denominator of which is 805.

                                                 Sincerely,


                                                 /s/ Dean Leavitt
                                                 Dean Leavitt
### §5953. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 105–391, title IV, §404, Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3508; Pub. L. 106–176, title III, §311, Mar. 10, 2000, 114 Stat. 34, related to term of concessions contracts. See section 101914 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
#### In the Matter of Freeman Street Properties, LLC, Appellant, v John Thelian, Respondent.

[824 NYS2d 359]

*476In a holdover proceeding, the petitioner appeals, by permission, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, dated December 22, 2004 [6 Misc 3d 127(A), 2004 NY Slip Op 51684(U) (2004)], as reversed a judgment of possession of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Rubin, J.), dated April 3, 2003, and dismissed the petition.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the petition is granted, and the judgment of possession is reinstated.

In this holdover proceeding, the landlord seeks to remove the tenant on the ground, inter alia, that the tenant violated the commercial use and anti-subletting provisions of the subject lease. After a lengthy trial, finding the testimony of the tenant and his witnesses “rife with admissions of income concealment from profits made through subletting, charging more than the stated rent in the leases at issue and tax fraud,” and that the tax fraud, by itself, impeached “all of [these] witnesses’ respective credibility,” the Civil Court concluded that the tenant had not adequately rebutted the documentary evidence or testimony provided on behalf of the landlord. Accordingly, rejecting the tenant’s assertions that the landlord had known of and acquiesced in the residential use, the Civil Court granted the petition and issued a judgment of possession. The Appellate Term reversed the judgment of possession and dismissed the petition. We reverse.

The Appellate Term correctly determined that, in the face of the documentary evidence, including the Department of Buildings’ documents reporting numerous instances of residential use in violation of the Building Code and undisputed testimony of extensive construction work performed in converting the commercial space *into*residential apartments, the landlord’s witnesses could not credibly testify that it lacked knowledge of, and did not acquiesce in, the residential use *(see Gordon & Gordon v Madavin, Ltd.,*108 Misc 2d 349 [1981]).

However, on the matter of the subletting and profiteering, “the determination of the Trial Judge . . . was not against the weight of the credible evidence, and constituted a reasonable assessment of the evidence, giving due consideration to the trial court’s advantage of seeing and hearing the witnesses” *(Health ’N Sports v 1020 WW Food Corp.,*191 AD2d 534 [1993]; *see Cohen v Cohen,*279 AD2d 599, 600 [2001]; *Laera v Molina,*100 AD2d 615, 616 [1984]). As this, alone, was sufficient to support the judgment of possession *(see BLF Realty Holding Corp. v*
      *477
      *Kasher,*299 AD2d 87 [2002]), the Appellate Term erred in reversing the judgment of possession and dismissing the petition.

In light of the above, the parties’ remaining contentions have been rendered academic. Florio, J.E, Schmidt, Krausman and Lifson, JJ., concur.
HECO Exhibit 99.3

Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc.

RECONCILIATION OF ELECTRIC UTILITY OPERATING

INCOME PER HEI AND HECO CONSOLIDATED

STATEMENTS OF INCOME



|                                                                                                                            |  |      |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------- | - | ---- | - | ------- | ---- |  | - | ------- | -
|Years ended December 31                                                                                                     |  | 2007 |         |   | 2006 |   |         | 2005 | 
|(in thousands)                                                                                                              |  |      |         |   |      |   |         |      | 
|                                                                                                                            |  |      |        
|Operating income from regulated and nonregulated activities before income taxes (per HEI Consolidated Statements of Income) |  |      | 130,585 |   |      | $ | 166,718 |      |  | $ | 161,703 |  
|Deduct:                                                                                                                     |  |      |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|Income taxes on regulated activities                                                                                        |  |      | (34,126 | ) |      |   | (47,381 | )    |  |   | (45,029 | )
|Revenues from nonregulated activities                                                                                       |  |      | (9,356  | ) |      |   | (4,478  | )    |  |   | (4,674  | )
|Add:                                                                                                                        |  |      |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|Expenses from nonregulated activities                                                                                       |  |      | 13,172  |   |      |   | 2,296   |      |  |   | 1,542   |  
|                                                                                                                            |  |      |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|Operating income from regulated activities after income taxes (per HECO Consolidated Statements of Income)                  |  | $    | 100,275 |   |      | $ | 117,155 |      |  | $ | 113,542 |  
|                                                                                                                            |  |      |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |
### §273c. Livestock trails, watering rights; driveway regulations

Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed as affecting in any way rights of owners and operators of cattle and sheep herds, existing on the date immediately prior to December 18, 1971, to trail their herds on traditional courses used by them prior to December 18, 1971, and to water their stock, notwithstanding the fact that the lands involving such trails and watering are situated within the park: Provided, That the Secretary may promulgate reasonable regulations providing for the use of such driveways.

(Pub. L. 92–207, §4, Dec. 18, 1971, 85 Stat. 740.)
### §460dd–2. Public lands

#### (a) Withdrawal from location, entry, and patent under Federal mining laws; removal of minerals

The lands within the recreation area, subject to valid existing rights, are withdrawn from location, entry, and patent under the United States mining laws. Under such regulations as he deems appropriate, the Secretary shall permit the removal of the nonleasable minerals from lands or interests in lands within the national recreation area in the manner prescribed by section 387 of title 43, and he shall permit the removal of leasable minerals from lands or interests in lands within the recreation area in accordance with the Mineral Leasing Act of February 25, 1920, as amended (30 U.S.C. 181 et seq.), or the Acquired Lands Mineral Leasing Act of August 7, 1947 (30 U.S.C. 351 et seq.), if he finds that such disposition would not have significant adverse effects on the Glen Canyon project or on the administration of the national recreation area pursuant to this subchapter.

#### (b) Disposition of funds from permits and leases

All receipts derived from permits and leases issued on lands in the recreation area under the Mineral Leasing Act of February 25, 1920, as amended [30 U.S.C. 181 et seq.], or the Act of August 7, 1947 [30 U.S.C. 351 et seq.], shall be disposed of as provided in the applicable Act; and receipts from the disposition of nonleasable minerals within the recreation area shall be disposed of in the same manner as moneys received from the sale of public lands.

(Pub. L. 92–593, §3, Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1312.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Mineral Leasing Act of February 25, 1920, as amended, referred to in text, is act Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, 41 Stat. 437, known as the Mineral Leasing Act, which is classified generally to chapter 3A (§181 et seq.) of Title 30. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 181 of Title 30 and Tables.

The Acquired Lands Mineral Leasing Act of August 7, 1947, referred to in text, is act Aug. 7, 1947, ch. 513, 61 Stat. 913, which is classified generally to chapter 7 (§351 et seq.) of Title 30. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 351 of Title 30 and Tables.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

June 22, 2021

____________________________________

In the Matter of :

Enerkon Solar International Inc. : ORDER OF SUSPENSION

OF TRADING

File No. 500-1 :

:

____________________________________

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) that the 

public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension in the trading of the securities 

of Enerkon Solar International Inc. (“Enerkon”) (CIK No. 0000802510) because of questions 

regarding the accuracy and adequacy of information in the marketplace about the company and 

its securities. Those questions relate to, among other things, lack of adequate and accurate 

information in Enerkon’s quarterly and annual financials submitted to OTC Link, whose parent 

company is OTC Markets Group, Inc. (“OTC Link”), as early as December 31, 2018, through 

Enerkon’s quarterly financials for March 31, 2021, submitted on June 3, 2021, relating to the 

identity of significant owners of Enerkon’s securities. Questions have also arisen about the 

accuracy and adequacy of publicly-disseminated information in press releases, including press

releases dated March 9, 2021, May 3, 2021, and May 11, 2021, concerning, among other things, 

Enerkon’s acquisition of CoviKlear Holdings International and its prospective operations, and 

the establishment of a solar and hydrogen plant in Pennsylvania.

Enerkon is a Nevada corporation with its principal offices in New York, New York. As 

of June 16, 2021, Enerkon’s common stock was quoted on OTC Link under the symbol “ENKS.” 
As of June 16, 2021, Enerkon’s common stock had nine market makers, and was eligible for the 

“piggyback” exception of Rule 15c2-11(f)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors 

require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange 

Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the above-listed company is suspended for the 

period from 9:30 a.m. EDT, on June 23, 2021 through 11:59 p.m. EDT, on July 7, 2021.

By the Commission.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary