UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 81625 / September 14, 2017

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-18180

In the Matter of 

Neurologix, Inc., Organic Alliance, Inc., and

Zinco do Brasil, Inc.,

Respondents.

ORDER INSTITUTING 

ADMINISTRATIVE 

PROCEEDINGS AND NOTICE OF 

HEARING PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 12(j) OF THE 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT 

OF 1934

I.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it necessary and 

appropriate for the protection of investors that public administrative proceedings be, and hereby 

are, instituted pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange 

Act”) against the Respondents named in the caption.

II.

After an investigation, the Division of Enforcement alleges that:

A. RESPONDENTS1

1. Neurologix, Inc. (“NRGXQ”) (CIK No. 356591) is a void Delaware corporation

located in Fort Lee, New Jersey with a class of securities registered with the Commission 

pursuant to Exchange Act Section 12(g). NRGXQ is delinquent in its periodic filings with the 

Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-Q for the period 

ended June 30, 2011, which reported a net loss of $5,033,000 for the prior six months. On 

March 16, 2012, NRGXQ filed a Chapter 7 petition in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District 

of Delaware, which was closed on February 14, 2017. As of September 7, 2017, the common 

stock of NRGXQ was quoted on OTC Link operated by OTC Markets Group Inc. (formerly 

“Pink Sheets”) (“OTC Link”), had six market makers and was eligible for the “piggyback” 

exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11(f)(3).

 

1The short form of each respondent’s name is also its ticker symbol. 
2

2. Organic Alliance, Inc. (“ORGC”) (CIK No. 1442634) is a revoked Nevada

corporation located in Carmel, California with a class of securities registered with the 

Commission pursuant to Exchange Act Section 12(g). ORGC is delinquent in its periodic filings 

with the Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-Q for the 

period ended September 30, 2013, which reported a net loss of $3,551,619 for the prior nine 

months. As of September 7, 2017, the common stock of ORGC was quoted on OTC Link, had 

six market makers and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c2-

11(f)(3).

3. Zinco do Brasil, Inc. (“ZNBR”) (CIK No. 1368055) is a void Delaware

corporation located in New York, New York with a class of securities registered with the 

Commission pursuant to Exchange Act Section 12(g). ZNBR is delinquent in its periodic filings 

with the Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-Q for the 

period ended November 30, 2013, which reported a net loss of $37,636 for the prior six months. 

As of September 7, 2017, the common stock of ZNBR was quoted on OTC Link, had six market 

makers and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11(f)(3).

B. DELINQUENT PERIODIC FILINGS

4. As discussed in more detail above, all of the Respondents are delinquent in their 

periodic filings with the Commission, have repeatedly failed to meet their obligations to file 

timely periodic reports, and failed to heed delinquency letters sent to them by the Division of 

Corporation Finance requesting compliance with their periodic filing obligations or, through 

their failure to maintain a valid address on file with the Commission as required by Commission 

rules, did not receive such letters.

5. Exchange Act Section 13(a) and the rules promulgated thereunder require issuers 

of securities registered pursuant to Exchange Act Section 12 to file with the Commission current 

and accurate information in periodic reports, even if the registration is voluntary under Section 

12(g). Specifically, Exchange Act Rule 13a-1 requires issuers to file annual reports, and 

Exchange Act Rule 13a-13 requires domestic issuers to file quarterly reports. 

6. As a result of the foregoing, Respondents failed to comply with Exchange Act 

Section 13(a) and Rules 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder.

III.

In view of the allegations made by the Division of Enforcement, the Commission deems 

it necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors that public administrative 

proceedings be instituted to determine: 

A. Whether the allegations contained in Section II hereof are true and, in connection 

therewith, to afford the Respondents an opportunity to establish any defenses to such 

allegations; and,

B. Whether it is necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors to suspend 

for a period not exceeding twelve months, or revoke the registration of each class of securities 

registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act of the Respondents identified in Section 
3

II hereof, and any successor under Exchange Act Rules 12b-2 or 12g-3, and any new corporate 

names of any Respondents.

IV.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a public hearing for the purpose of taking evidence on 

the questions set forth in Section III hereof shall be convened at a time and place to be fixed, 

and before an Administrative Law Judge to be designated by further order as provided by Rule 

110 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice [17 C.F.R. § 201.110].

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that each Respondent shall file an Answer to 

the allegations contained in this Order within ten (10) days after service of this Order, as 

provided by Rule 220(b) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice [17 C.F.R. § 201.220(b)].

If any Respondent fails to file the directed Answer, or fails to appear at a hearing after 

being duly notified, such Respondent, and any successor under Exchange Act Rules 12b-2 or 

12g-3, and any new corporate names of such Respondent, may be deemed in default and the 

proceedings may be determined against it upon consideration of the allegations of this Order as 

to such Respondent, which may be deemed to be true as provided by Rules 155(a), 220(f), 

221(f), and 310 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice [17 C.F.R. §§ 201.155(a), 201.220(f), 

201.221(f), and 201.310].

This Order shall be served forthwith upon Respondents by any means permitted by the 

Commission Rules of Practice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 360(a)(2) of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice, [17 C.F.R. § 201.360(a)(2)], the Administrative Law Judge shall issue an 

initial decision no later than thirty (30) days from the occurrence of one of the following events: 

(A) The completion of post-hearing briefing in a proceeding where the hearing has been 

completed; (B) Where the hearing officer has determined that no hearing is necessary, upon 

completion of briefing on a motion pursuant to Rule 250 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, 

[17 C.F.R. § 201.250]; or (C) The determination by the hearing officer that a party is deemed to 

be in default under Rule 155 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, [17 C.F.R. § 201.155] and 

no hearing is necessary. 
4

In the absence of an appropriate waiver, no officer or employee of the Commission 

engaged in the performance of investigative or prosecuting functions in this or any factually 

related proceeding will be permitted to participate or advise in the decision of this matter, 

except as witness or counsel in proceedings held pursuant to notice. Since this proceeding is not 

“rule making” within the meaning of Section 551 of the Administrative Procedure Act, it is not 

deemed subject to the provisions of Section 553 delaying the effective date of any final 

Commission action.

By the Commission.

Brent J. Fields

Secretary