alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 16-06 25 V Filed: September 13, 2016 Unpublished

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * CHERYL ZANGHI , * * Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine ; Shoulder

v. * Injury Related to Vaccine Administration * (“SIRVA”); Special Processing Unit SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“SPU”) AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Leah V. Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC , f or petitioner. Ryan D. Pyles , U .S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Dorsey

, Chief Special Master:

On May 26, 2016

, Cheryl Zangh i (“p etitioner ”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq. , 2 (the “Vaccine Act” or “Program”)

. Peti tioner alleges that as a result of receiving the influenza (“flu”) vaccine on December 2, 2014 , she suffered a shoulder injury that

was caused

- in

- fact by her vaccination

. Pet ition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) of the Office of Special Masters.

On September 12, 2016

, respondent filed a Rule 4(c) r eport conceding entitle ment to compensa tion in this case. Rule 4(c) Rep

. at 1

. R espondent concluded

, based on her evaluation of the evidence, that petitioner’s injury is consistent with a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”)

, and that the injury was

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance wi th the E

- Government Act of 2002

. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012)(Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the ident ified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).2 caused- in

- fact by her vaccination

. Id. at 3

. Respondent state d that she did not identify any other causes for petitioner’s SIRVA, and that the evidence of record demonstrate s petitioner has suffered the residual effects of her condition for more than six months. Id. P etitioner has therefore satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation

. Id.

In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence of record
, the undersigned find s that petitioner is entitle d to compensation

.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             367
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,327
<ALLOWANCES>                                       975
<INVENTORY>                                      1,945
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,898
<PP&E>                                           2,663
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,046
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,896
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,633
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,634
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,629
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36,896
<SALES>                                         31,256
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,256
<CGS>                                           22,091
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (50)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,377
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,995)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,276
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,271)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,506
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,765)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.32)


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Government Employees Insurance Company, Respondent, v Boris Goldenberg, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 675]

In a proceeding pursuant to CFLR article 75 to stay arbitration of a claim for uninsured motorist benefits, Boris Goldenberg appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Cannizzaro, J.H.O.), dated August 31, 2005, which, after a hearing, granted the petition.

*583Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the Supreme Court was free to disbelieve the appellant’s uncontroverted testimony on the issue of whether he timely reported the subject accident to the police (see *Matter of Nowakowski,*2 NY2d 618, 622; *Mynarski v Ravo,*72 AD2d 741 [1979]). Under the facts of this case, we decline to disturb the Supreme Court’s determination. Miller, J.E, Ritter, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.
Not Flu.

Spread fun.

Everyone 6 months of age and older should get a fu vaccine every year.

Even healthy kids of any age can get seriously sick from the fu,

and they can spread it to family, friends, and others.

CS254717L

For more information, visit http://www.cdc.gov/flu
<PAGE>   1
                             CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT             EXHIBIT 3(iii)

                                       OF

                      RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                              THE HERTZ CORPORATION



     THE HERTZ CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION (THE "CORPORATION"), DOES
HEREBY CERTIFY:

     THE AMENDMENT SET FORTH BELOW TO THE CORPORATION'S RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF
INCORPORATION, AS HERETOFORE AMENDED, WAS DULY ADOPTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
PROVISIONS OF SECTION 242 OF THE GENERAL CORPORATION LAW OF THE STATE OF
DELAWARE:

     THAT SECTION 2.2(c) OF ARTICLE FOURTH BE AND HEREBY IS DELETED:

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE HERTZ CORPORATION HAS CAUSED THIS CERTIFICATE TO BE
SIGNED AND ATTESTED BY ITS DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICERS, THIS 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER,
1995.

                                                      /S/ WILLIAM SIDER
                                                      ------------------------
                                                      EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT

ATTEST:


/S/ I. DAVID PARKOFF
-------------------------
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 93-9345 

ROBIN JOY SHAHAR,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL J. BOWERS, Individually

and in his official capacity as

Attorney General of the State of

Georgia,

Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Georgia

--------------------------

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion December 20, 1995, 11th Cir., 1995, F.2d )

(March 8, 1996)

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX,

BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.*

B Y T H E C O U R T :

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll

on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in

this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing

en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court
2

en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

___________________________

*Senior U.S. Circuit Judge John C. Godbold has elected to participate in 

further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c).
### §460bb–4. Golden Gate National Recreation Area Advisory Commission

#### (a) Establishment

There is hereby established the Golden Gate National Recreation Area Advisory Commission (hereinafter referred to as the "Commission").

#### (b) Membership; appointment; term of office

The Commission shall be composed of eighteen members appointed by the Secretary for terms of five years each.1 Provided, That the terms of those members who have been either appointed or reappointed subsequent to January 1, 1979, shall be extended so as to expire not before June 1, 1985.

#### (c) Vacancies

Any vacancy in the Commission shall be filled in the same manner in which the original appointment was made.

#### (d) Compensation and expenses; vouchers

Members of the Commission shall serve without compensation, as such, but the Secretary may pay, upon vouchers signed by the Chairman, the expenses reasonably incurred by the Commission and its members in carrying out their responsibilities under this subchapter.

#### (e) Consultations of Secretary with members

The Secretary, or his designee, shall from time to time, but at least annually, meet and consult with the Commission on general policies and specific matters related to planning, administration and development affecting the recreation area and other units of the national park system in Marin, San Mateo, and San Francisco Counties.

#### (f) Voting

The Commission shall act and advise by affirmative vote of a majority of the members thereof.

#### (g) Termination date

The Commission shall cease to exist thirty years after October 27, 1972.

(Pub. L. 92–589, §5, Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1302; Pub. L. 95–625, title III, §317(g), Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3486; Pub. L. 96–344, §4(2), (3), Sept. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 1134; Pub. L. 96–607, title X, §1001(6), (7), Dec. 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 3545; Pub. L. 102–525, title III, §303, Oct. 26, 1992, 106 Stat. 3441.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 102–525 substituted "thirty" for "twenty".

1980—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 96–607, §1001(6), substituted "eighteen" for "seventeen".

Pub. L. 96–344, §4(2), substituted "five" for "three" and inserted proviso that the terms of members appointed or reappointed subsequent to Jan. 1, 1979, be extended so as not to expire before June 1, 1985.

Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 96–607, §1001(7), substituted "Marin, San Mateo," for "Marin".

Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 96–344, §4(3), substituted "twenty" for "ten".

1978—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 95–625 increased Commission membership from fifteen to seventeen.

1 So in original. The period probably should be a colon.
# Official Journal C 276/11 N

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 276 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4711 November 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 276

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4711 November 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 276/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2004/C 276/2 | Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 276/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2004/C 276/2

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

2

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| 2004/C 276/3 | Corrigendum to the OJ C 105, 30.4.2004 | 3 |

Corrigenda

2004/C 276/3

Corrigendum to the OJ C 105, 30.4.2004

3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2004/C 276/4 | 1 November 2004 — New version of EUR-Lex! | s3 |

2004/C 276/4

1 November 2004 — New version of EUR-Lex!

s3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3524 — BARCLAYS PRIVATE EQUITY FRANCE/FIVES-LILLE)

(2004/C 208/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 10 August 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

----
#### § 79.35 Proof of onset of leukemia at least two years after first exposure, and proof of onset of a specified compensable disease more than five years after first exposure.

Absent any indication to the contrary, the earliest date of onsite participation indicated on any records accepted by the Radiation Exposure Compensation Program as proof of the claimant's onsite participation will be presumed to be the date of first or initial exposure. The date of onset will be the date of diagnosis as indicated on the medical documentation accepted by the Radiation Exposure Compensation Program as proof of the specified compensable disease. Proof of the onset of leukemia shall be established in accordance with § 79.15.
### §§510, 510a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 510, act Aug. 8, 1916, ch. 295, 39 Stat. 440, which applied the provisions of sections 506 to 508 and 509 of this title to lands within the national forests in Lawrence and Pennington Counties in South Dakota, was omitted because of the repeal of sections 506 to 508 and 509 of this title.

Section 510a, act June 13, 1930, ch. 481, 46 Stat. 583, prohibiting the acceptance of applications for the classification and listing of lands in the Custer National Forest for homestead entry with provision for the Secretary of Agriculture to list, in his discretion, limited tracts when in his opinion such action would be in the public interest and would not be injurious to other settlers or users of the national forest, has been omitted in view of the repeal by Pub. L. 87–869, §4, Oct. 23, 1962, 76 Stat. 1157, of the provision under which such classification and listing were carried out.
<PAGE>


Mr. A. Roland Thomas                                                30 June 1997
10 Sedgemeadow Road
Wayland, MA
USA

Dear Roland:

Re:  Moldflow Pty. Ltd. - Service Agreement dated 1 July 1994
-------------------------------------------------------------

It is the intention of the parties to modify the abovementioned agreement.
Therefore, in accordance with Section 22 of the agreement, this letter shall
hereby amend the Service Agreement effective 31 January 1997 as follows:

     The time for payment by Moldflow of the amount due in accordance with
paragraph 2.1(b) of the Remuneration Schedule as it relates to Section 5 of
the Agreement shall be extended to June 30, 1999, or earlier upon agreement
of the parties.

     All other terms and conditions of the Service Agreement shall remain in
force.

Kindly indicate your acceptance of these terms by signing and returning to me
the attached copy of this letter.

Very truly yours,


/s/ Suzanne E. Rogers
---------------------------
Suzanne E. Rogers
Company Assistant Secretary
Moldflow Pty. Ltd.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I, A. Roland Thomas, agree to accept this amendment to the Service Agreement
dated 1 July 1994, in accordance with the terms set out above.


Signed:  /s/ Roland Thomas
       --------------------------------------

Date:  30/6/97
      ---------------------------------------
### §460s–11. Zoning bylaws; assistance and consultation with township or county officers or employees; technical aid payments

The Secretary shall, at the request of any township or county in or adjacent to the lakeshore affected by this subchapter, assist and consult with the appropriate officers and employees of such township or county in establishing zoning bylaws. Such assistance may include payments to the county or township for technical aid.

(Pub. L. 89–668, §12, Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 925.)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 99754 / March 18, 2024

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-20811

In the Matter of 

BRUCE ZIPPER and

DAKOTA SECURITIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

For Review of Disciplinary Action Taken by

FINRA

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ISSUE DECISION

The Commission has determined, in its discretion, that it is appropriate to extend by 90

days the period within which the decision in this matter may be issued. Accordingly, IT IS 

ORDERED that such period be, and hereby is, extended to June 17, 2024.

1

By the Commission.

 Vanessa A. Countryman

 Secretary

1 June 16, 2024, is a Sunday.
§ 490.201 Purpose. The purpose of this subpart is to implement the requirements of 23 U.S.C. 150(c)(4), which requires the Secretary of Transportation to establish performance measures for the purpose of carrying out the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) and for State departments of transportation (State DOTs) to use in assessing: ( a ) Serious injuries and fatalities per vehicle miles traveled (VMT); and
( b ) Number of serious injuries and fatalities.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, Mark A. Kopser, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of United SurgicalPartners International, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;  3 [Intentionally omitted]  4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internalcontrol over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the Registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this reportis being prepared;  b) Designed such internal control over financialreporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assuranceregarding the reliability of financial reporting andthe preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in theRegistrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theRegistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significantrole in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting./s/ Mark A. Kopser Mark A. Kopser
§ 301.203 Payment of lost-time wages. ( a ) An inmate worker may receive lost-time wages for the number of regular work hours absent from work due to injury sustained in the performance of the assigned work.
( b ) Lost-time wages are paid for time lost in excess of three consecutively scheduled workdays. The day of injury is considered to be the first workday regardless of the time of injury.
( c ) An inmate may receive lost-time wages at the rate of 75% of the standard hourly rate of the inmate's regular work assignment at the time of the injury.
[55 FR 9296, Mar. 12, 1990. Redesignated at 59 FR 2667, Jan. 18, 1994]
### Geology and ore deposits of the White Canyon area, San Juan and Garfield Counties, Utah

By: Robert E. ThadenAlbert F. Trites Jr.Tommy L. Finnell

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1125

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 15 - 00136 - CV GREG NOYOLA, APPELLA NT V. TITLE ONE, DIGITAL T ITLE SERVICES, LLC A ND BRADLEY ELDER, INDIVIDUALLY, APPELL EE S On Appeal from the 237th District Court Lubbock County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014 - 514,028, Honorable Leslie Hatch, Presiding



### July 10, 2015 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. Through their attorneys, Greg Noyola, appellant, and Title One, Digital Title Services, LLC and Bradley Elder, appellees, have filed a joint motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal. Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Pro cedure 42.1(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at the parties’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith. Per Curiam