alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 82047 / November 9, 2017

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-16757

In the Matter of

Citigroup Alternative Investment LLC and 

Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

Respondents.

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO 

ENTER AN ORDER APPROVING OR 

DISAPPROVING PLAN OF 

DISTRIBUTION 

On September 11, 2017, pursuant to Rule 1103 of the United States Securities and 

Exchange Commission’s (“Commission”) Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans 

(“Rules”), 17 C.F.R.§ 201.1103, the Commission published a Notice of Proposed Plan of 

Distribution and Opportunity to Comment (“Notice”)1for the distribution of monies placed into 

a Fair Fund in the above-captioned matter. The Notice invited public comment on the proposed 

plan of distribution (“Plan”) through October 11, 2017, and the Commission received public 

comments that raised various issues.

Rule 1104 of the Rules, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1104, provides in relevant part, “[t]he order 

approving or disapproving the plan should be entered within 30 days after the end of the final 

period allowed for comments on the proposed plan unless the Commission or the hearing officer, 

by written order, allows a longer period for good cause shown.”

Thirty days from the end of the final period for comments on the Plan will lapse on 

November 13, 2017. The Division states that additional time is needed to allow for further 

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 81570 (Sept. 11, 2017).
2

evaluation, analysis and consultation with other offices to properly address the comments; and, 

therefore, good cause has been shown to extend the thirty-day time period, provided in Rule 

1104 of the Rules, with entry of an order extending time to approve or disapprove the Plan until 

February 12, 2018.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 1104 of the Rules,2for good cause 

shown, the time for entering an order approving or disapproving the Plan is extended to February 

12, 2018.

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Brent J. Fields 

Secretary

 

2

 17 C.F.R. § 201.1104.
# Official Journal C 320A/1 Se

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 320A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 591 September 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 320A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 591 September 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 320 A/01 | Vacancy for the Vice-President — Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) (Temporary Agent at grade AD 12) — COM/2016/20015 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2016/C 320 A/01

Vacancy for the Vice-President — Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) (Temporary Agent at grade AD 12) — COM/2016/20015

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
### BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATION OFFICE OFTHE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, DC ) In the matter ofthe cancellation ofthe Air Taxi authority issue to: ) ) ) ) ) ) 

### Docket DOT-OST-2012-0022 VIH COUGAR HELICOPTERS, INC )



# ____________________________)

NOTICE OFAPPEARANCE

Please enter the appearance ofthe following attorneys as Counsel to Petroleum Helicopters, Inc, And serve them with documents in the above captioned proceeding at the addresses shown below: Jonathan Blank John Longstreth Timothy Hobbs

Dated: March 27, 2012 jonathan.blank@klgates.com john.longstreth@klgates.com tim.hobbs@klgates.com 202-661-6250 202-661-6271 206-370-7664

Attorney for Petroleum Helicopters Inc.NOTICE OF SERVICE

I have caused this document to be served onthe following bypost and by email upon counsel to VIH Cougar.
David M Nadler David Y Yang Counsel to Vlli Cougar

Helicopters Inc. Dickstein Shapiro LLP 1825 EYE Street NW Washington, DC 20006-5403 nadlerd@dicksteinshapiro.com yangd@dicksteinshapiro.com
William J. Weber Certification SectionManager FAAAFS-900 45005 Aviation Drive, Suite 131 Dulles, VA 20166

Roy Hardie Aviation Safety Inspector Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave SW Washington, DC 20553-0001

Dated March 27,2012 Peter Lynch AGC-300 Assistant ChiefCounsel for Enforcement Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave SW Washington, DC 20591

William Steeper President VIH Cougar Helicopters Inc. P.O. Box 872 Bellingham, Washington, 98227



### - 2-
1 

### Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 8:31 AM

To: 'r.patrick.thornberry@FaegreBD.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Information - CameraBee, LLC

Mr. Thornberry,

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA

‐ 2015

‐ 1755). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

* Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e.

‐ fixed

‐ wing,rotorcraft, lighter

‐ than

‐ air) for the proposed UAS

operation. The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located

in the aircraft manual(s).

* Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1,

Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closed

‐ set filming from

your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non

‐ proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e

‐ mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov

. If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 8/13/15. If we do not receive

the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267

‐ 9521.

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202

‐ 267

‐ 9521
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.11


                               SILICON VALLEY BANK
                                40 William Street
                               Wellesley, MA 02481


                                              January 19, 1999


TO:      Moldflow Corporation
         Moldflow International Pty Ltd., and
         Moldflow Pty Ltd. (collectively, the "Borrowers")
         Attn:    Suzanne E. Rogers

                  Chief Financial Officer

RE:      Corrective Amendment to Loan Modification Agreement No. 2 dated
         November 30, 1998


         Reference is made to Loan Document Modification Agreement No. 2 dated
November 30, 1998 among the Borrowers and the Bank (the "Second Amendment").

         The purpose of this corrective amendment is to correct the following
typographical errors to the Second Amendment:

         1.       The minimum Net Income requirement for the fiscal quarter
                  ending September 30, 1999 as set forth in Section 6.9 of the
                  Credit Agreement as amended by the Amendment is hereby changed
                  from "$100,000" to "$250,000."

         2.       The Compliance Certificate attached to the Second Amendment is
                  hereby corrected by amending the profitability test for the
                  quarter ending 6/30/99 from "$100,000" to "$250,000." A
                  corrected form of the Compliance Certificate is attached
                  hereto as Exhibit D.

                  [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]


<PAGE>


                                       -2-


         Upon execution by the Borrowers where indicated below, this letter
amendment shall be deemed effective as of the date of Amendment No. 2. In all
other respects, Amendment No. 2 and the Credit Agreement shall remain unchanged.
This Agreement may be signed in more than one counterpart, each of which shall
be any original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the
same document.

                                     SILICON VALLEY BANK

                                     By: /s/ Andrew H. Tsao
                                         ----------------------
                                          Name:  Andrew H. Tsao
                                          Title: Vice President

MOLDFLOW CORPORATION

By: /s/ Marc Dulude
    -------------------
     Name:  Marc Dulude
     Title: President, CEO


MOLDFLOW INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD.

By: /s/ Marc Dulude
    --------------------
     Name:  Marc Dulude
     Title: Director


MOLDFLOW PTY LTD.

By: /s/ Marc Dulude
    --------------------
     Name:  Marc Dulude
     Title: Director
**EXHIBIT 23.1**
**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements of HawthorneFinancial Corporation on Form S-3/A, Amendment No. 3 (No. 333-61707) and Form S-8 (Nos. 33-74800, 333-23587,333-59879 and 333-59875) of our report dated January 29, 2002 (March 20, 2002 as to Note 20),appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, AmendmentNo. 3 of Hawthorne Financial Corporation for the yearended December 31, 2001.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
 
Los Angeles, California
§ 750.709 On-property or on-premise advertising. ( a ) A sign which consists solely of the name of the establishment or which identifies the establishment's principal or accessory products or services offered on the property is an on-property sign.
( b ) When a sign consists principally of brand name or trade name advertising and the product or service advertised is only incidental to the principal activity, or if it brings rental income to the property owner, it shall be considered the business of outdoor advertising and not an on-property sign.
( c ) A sale or lease sign which also advertises any product or service not conducted upon and unrelated to the business or selling or leasing the land on which the sign is located is not an on-property sign.
( d ) Signs are exempt from control under 23 U.S.C. 131 if they solely advertise the sale or lease of property on which they are located or advertise activities conducted on the property on which they are located. These signs are subject to regulation (subpart A, part 750, chapter I, 23 CFR) in those States which have executed a bonus agreement, 23 U.S.C. 131(j). State laws or regulations shall contain criteria for determining exemptions. These criteria may include: ( 1 ) A property test for determining whether a sign is located on the same property as the activity or property advertised; and
( 2 ) A purpose test for determining whether a sign has as its sole purpose the identification of the activity located on the property or its products or services, or the sale or lease of the property on which the sign is located.
( 3 ) The criteria must be sufficiently specific to curb attempts to improperly qualify outdoor advertising as “on-property” signs, such as signs on narrow strips of land contiguous to the advertised activity when the purpose is clearly to circumvent 23 U.S.C. 131.
#### § 1235.8 Reciprocity.

The State system shall recognize removable windshield placards, temporary removable windshield placards and special license plates which have been issued by issuing authorities of other States and countries, for the purpose of identifying vehicles permitted to utilize parking spaces reserved for persons with disabilities which limit or impair the ability to walk.
§ 204.314 Appeal. ( a ) *Decisions that may be appealed.* ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section: ( i ) An applicant may appeal the denial of a Form I-800A (including the denial of a request to extend the prior approval of a Form I-800A) and
( ii ) A petitioner may appeal the denial of a Form I-800.
( 2 ) The provisions of 8 CFR 103.3, concerning how to file an appeal, and how USCIS adjudicates an appeal, apply to the appeal of a decision under this subpart C.
( b ) *Decisions that may not be appealed.* There is no appeal from the denial of: ( 1 ) Form I-800A because the Form I-800A was filed during any period during which 8 CFR 204.307(c) bars the filing of a Form I-800A; or
( 2 ) Form I-800A for failure to timely file a home study as required by 8 CFR 204.310(a)(3)(viii); or
( 3 ) Form I-800 that is denied because the Form I-800 was filed during any period during which 8 CFR 204.307(c) bars the filing of a Form I-800;
( 4 ) Form I-800 filed either before USCIS approved a Form I-800A or after the expiration of the approval of a Form I-800A.
CS 315822-U 09/16/2020

10 yam uas koj muaj peev xwm ua tau txhawm rau tswj 

xyuas koj cov tsos mob ntawm Tus Kab Mob Khaus Viv-19 

(COVID-19) nyob rau tom vaj tsev

Cov Ntaub Ntawv Uas Kag Cuag Tau: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/if-you-are-sick/steps-when-sick.html

Yog hais tias koj muaj cov tsos mob zoo ntxim li yog los sis paub tseeb lawm tias 

yog Tus Kab Mob Khaus Viv-19 (COVID-19):

1. Nyob twj ywm hauv tsev

tsis txhob mus ua hauj lwm thiab 

tsis txhob mus kawm ntawv. Thiab 

nyob kom nrug deb ntawm ntawm 

lwm cov chaw uas muaj zej tsoom 

nyob coob. Yog hais tias koj yuav 

tsum tau tawm mus sab nrauv, 

zam tsis txhob siv txhua hom kev 

siv tsheb thauj xa zej tsoom mus 

los,kev caij tsheb ua ke nrog lwm 

tus neeg, los sis tsheb tav xij.

2. Ntsuam xyuas koj cov tsos 

mobkom xyuam xim. Yog hais 

tias koj cov tsos mob mob loj 

tuaj, hu rau koj tus kws muab kev 

saib xyuas kho mob rau fab kev 

noj qab haus huv tam sim ntawd. 

3. So kom txaus thiab 

haus dej rau lub cev. 

4. Yog hais tias koj muaj kev teem caij 

sib ntsib rau fab kev kuaj mob, hu 

rau tus kws muab kev saib 

xyuas kho mob rau fab kev 

noj qab haus huv paub ua ntej 

thiab hais qhia rau lawv paub tias 

tej zaum koj muaj Tus Kab Mob 

Khaus Viv-19 (COVID-19) lawm.

5. Rau cov xwm txheej ceev los sis 

mob hnyav, hu rau 911 thiab ceeb 

toom rau tus neeg ua hauj 

lwm txog kev xa neeg mus 

los paub tias koj muaj los sis tej 

zaum muaj Tus Kab Mob Khaus 

Viv-19 (COVID-19).

6. Siv ntawv so ntswg los 

ua zoo npog koj qhov 

ncauj thaum hnoos los sis 

txham los sis siv koj sab lauj 

tshib sab hauv los yeej tau.

7. Nquag siv xab npum thiab dej 

ntxuav koj ob txhais tes tas li kom 

ntev tsawg kawg yog 20 chib (xis 

nkoos) los sis siv tshuaj ntxuav tes 

tua kab mob muaj kuab cawv xyaw 

nrog tsawg 60% los tu ntxuav koj ob 

txhais tes kom huv si. 

8. Yog hais tias ua tau, nyob twj ywm 

rau hauv ib chav tshwj xeeb thiab 

nyob kom sib nrug deb ntawm 

lwm cov neeg hauv koj lub vaj tsev. 

Tsis tas li ntawd, yog hais tias muaj, 

koj yuav tsum siv chav da dej uas cais 

tawm nyias siv nyias chav. Yog hais tias 

koj xav nyob ze ib puag ncig ntawm 

lwm cov neeg hauv koj lub vaj tsev los 

sis nyob rau sab nraum zoov ntawm 

koj lub vaj tsev, yuav tsum rau ib daim 

ntaub npog ntsej muag.

9. Zam tsis txhob sib koom siv 

cov khoom siv rau tus kheej 

nrog lwm cov neeghauv koj yim 

neeg, xws li cov phaj, cov phuam, 

thiab cov ntaub pua txaj.

10. Tu ntxuav tag nrho cov 

chaw (npoo los sis ntug) uas 

nyiam tuav (chwv) tas li kom huv 

si, xws li cov rooj, cov khoom nyob 

saum qaum rooj, thiab cov pob 

xauv qhov rooj. Siv cov tshuaj tsuag 

(nyem txua) rau los sis cov ntaub so 

rau kev tu ntxuav khoom vaj tsev 

kom huv si raws li cov lus qhia nyob 

rau ntawm daim ntawv nplaum 

muab lus qhia. 

cdc.gov/coronavirus
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Spring Valley  Management
Corp.,  on Form  10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the
undersigned, B. Stephen Bailey, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §17l. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, act June 23, 1936, ch. 735, §2, 49 Stat. 1894, related to coordination; planning by States with aid of National Park Service. See section 100504(a)(4) of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with thequarterly report of The SCO Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q, for thequarter ended April 30, 2003, the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to the best of each of our knowledge:

 

1.                                       Thequarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| By:    | /s/ Robert K. Bench     |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert K. Bench         |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                    |
|   |                    |
| Date:  | June 13, 2003      |

 

1

----
The HONORABLE GARY A. FENNER, United States District Judge for the 1

Western District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 96-4085

___________

United States of America, *

 *

Appellee, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Western District of Missouri.

David E. Longley, *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: July 21, 1997

 Filed: July 25, 1997

___________

Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

David Longley challenges the 18-month sentence imposed on him by the district

court following the revocation of his supervised release. Counsel has filed a brief

1

pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). We granted Longley leave to

file a pro se supplemental brief, which he has not done. We affirm.
-2-

We review the district court's sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised

release for an abuse of discretion, and we find none here. See United States v. Carr,

66 F.3d 981, 983 (8th Cir. 1995) (per curiam); United States v. Grimes, 54 F.3d 489,

492 (8th Cir. 1995). Because Longley's underlying conviction was a Class C felony,

the maximum statutory term of imprisonment for violating the conditions of his

supervised release was 24 months, see 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3), and his 18-month

revocation sentence was well within that maximum.

Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Confirmation of Thomas B. McCabe

              																	United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking and Currency, 1913-1970					 and 	Eightieth Congress, 1947-1949. 						*Confirmation of Thomas B. McCabe : Hearings Before the Committee on Banking and Currency, United States Senate, Eightieth Congress, Second Session, March 3, 10, 11, 24, and 30, 1948*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										March 3, 10, 11, 24, and 30, 1948,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/768,			accessed on September 13, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
### §590q. Coverage; "State" defined; short title

(a) This chapter shall apply to the States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Virgin Islands, and, as used in this chapter, the term "State" includes Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Virgin Islands.

(b) This chapter may be cited as the "Soil Conservation and Domestic Allotment Act".

(Apr. 27, 1935, ch. 85, §17, as added Feb. 29, 1936, ch. 104, §1, 49 Stat. 1151; amended July 26, 1947, ch. 339, §2, 61 Stat. 494; Pub. L. 86–70, §13(b), June 25, 1959, 73 Stat. 143; Pub. L. 86–624. §8(b), July 12, 1960, 74 Stat. 412; Pub. L. 98–454, title VI, §601(d), Oct. 5, 1984, 98 Stat. 1736.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–454 inserted reference to Guam, American Samoa, and the Northern Mariana Islands in two places.

1960—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 86–624 substituted "States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico" for "States, the Territory of Hawaii, and the possessions of Puerto Rico", and struck out "Hawaii" from definition of "State".

1959—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 86–70 substituted "the States, the Territory of Hawaii," for "the United States, the Territories of Alaska and Hawaii", and struck out "Alaska," after "the term 'State' includes".

1947—Subsec. (a). Act July 26, 1947, included the Virgin Islands.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeals

Section 3 of act July 26, 1947, repealed all laws in conflict therewith.
<PAGE>   1
                                 EXHIBIT 10 (n)


List of Senior Executive Officers with Severance Agreements in the form of
Exhibit 10(m).



Todd B. Barnum, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board
Mark F. Emerson, Chief Operating Officer
William C. Niegsch, Jr., Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer