alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

NOV 0 3 2014 

Mr. Darwin Binek 

Engine and Propeller Directorate 

Quality Assurance Manager 

Turbomeca USA 

2709 North Forum Drive 

Grand Prairie, TX 75052 

Dear Mr. Binek: 

Engine Certification Office 

12 New England Executive Park 

Burlington, MA 01803 

(781) 238-7140, Fax: (781) 238-7199 

Subject: Turbomeca Global Alternative Method of Compliance (AMOC) to Airworthiness 

Directive (AD) 2014-19-05 

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Engine Certification Office (ECO) received 

your email dated October 24,2014, requesting an AMOC to AD 2014-19-05, paragraph (g), 

for the Turbomeca Arriel l and Arriel 2 series turboshaft engines. Paragraph (g) of AD 

2014-19-05 defines an "engine shop visit" as the induction of an engine into the shop for 

maintenance involving the separation of pairs of major mating engine flanges. 

Turbomeca's AMOC proposal would revise the definition of an "engine shop visit" to state 

that "a qualifYing shop visit is when an engine is removed from the helicopter and the module 

MOl/engine is overhauled or repaired in a qualified Repair Center". Turbomeca defines a 

"qualified Repair Center" to be a shop that performs engine repairs/overhauls using 

instructions per the applicable Turbomeca Overhaul Manuals. This definition of an engine 

shop visit is consistent with the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2014-0036. 

The ECO reviewed the supporting data for your request and agrees that the proposed engine 

shop visit definition is consistent with the intent of the AD. Therefore, the FAA approves 

your request for a Global AMOC to paragraph (g) of AD 2014-19-05 to define an "engine 

shop visit" to be when an engine is removed from the helicopter and the module MO II engine 

is overhauled or repaired in a qualified Repair Center where repair/overhaul operations are 

accomplished using the applicable Turbomeca Overhaul Manuals. 

We have determined that this AMOC is of general applicability to the Turbomeca Arriel 1 

and Arriel 2 series engine type design, and therefore this letter is issued to Turbomeca with 

the understanding that it may subsequently be distributed to operators. Operators may then 

use this letter, along with evidence of compliance with the terms of this letter, to document 

compliance to AD 2014-19-05 . 

This FAA AMOC is transferable with the engine(s) to another owner or operator. 

Before using this AMOC, operators must notifY their appropriate principal inspector, or 

lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district 

office/certificate holding district office. 
2 

All provisions ofF AA AD 2014-19-05 that are not specifically referenced above remain fully 

applicable and must be complied with accordingly. 

If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Mark Riley at 781-

238-7758, fax 781-238-7199, or via electronic mail at mark.riley@faa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

,R;r Diane Cook 

Acting Manager, Engine Certification Office 

cc: 1. White AEG 

cc: EASA
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,416
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,944<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                       479
<INVENTORY>                                      3,316
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,013
<PP&E>                                           9,197<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,477
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,398
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,082
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,216
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,398
<SALES>                                         41,691
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,691
<CGS>                                           26,475
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,475
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    14
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 146
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,317)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (208)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,525)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,525)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.36)

<FN>
<F1>
Presented gross
</FN>

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 200 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 200

     Authorizing the taking of a photograph in the Senate Chamber.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 9, 2019

   Mr. Blunt (for himself and Ms. Klobuchar) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Authorizing the taking of a photograph in the Senate Chamber.

    Resolved, That paragraph 1 of rule IV of the Rules for the 
Regulation of the Senate Wing of the United States Capitol and Senate 
Office Buildings (prohibiting the taking of pictures in the Senate 
Chamber) be temporarily suspended for the sole and specific purpose of 
permitting the Senate Photographic Studio to photograph the Senate in 
actual session on Tuesday, May 14, 2019, at the hour of 2:15 p.m.
    Sec. 2.  The Sergeant at Arms of the Senate is authorized and 
directed to make the necessary arrangements therefore, which 
arrangements shall provide for a minimum of disruption to Senate 
proceedings.
                                 <all>
```
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-12-00722- CR

Joe P ena, Sr., Appellan t

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F MI LAM CO UNTY, 20TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. CR19,2 69, H ONO RAB LE CHARLES E. LANCE, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
In 1996, appellant pled guilty to ag g ravated sexual assault of a child and was place d
on defe rre d adjudicati o n for eig ht y ear s. In 1998, the trial court adjudicate d appellant’ s guilt and sentenc ed him to thirty year s imprisonment. About one y ear later, appellant filed a notice of appea l, and we dismissed that appea l, e x plaining that we wer e without jurisdiction to c onsider appellant’ s complaints and that he must instead ra ise them by way of a post-conviction application for writ of habea s corpus. See Pena v. State , No. 03-99-00457- CR, 1999 Tex. App. L EXI S 6354, at *1-2 (Tex. App.—Austin Aug . 26, 1999, no pet.).

On November 15, 2012, appellant filed an “Untimely Notice of Appea l,” asserting that his attorney had a conflict of interest and should not have been a llowed to repr esent him , that his attorney

failed to file a

timely notice of a

ppeal a s reque sted, and that the trial cour t improperly considere d extran eous offenses in deciding to revoke his defe rre d adjudication. As in appellant’ sear lier attempt to appea l, we are without jurisdiction to consider the merits of appellant’ s complaints.

Appellant must first seek and obtain permission from the court of criminal appea ls to file an out-oftime appea l. See Clark v. State , 287 S.W .3d 355, 355-56 & n.2 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2009, no pet.); see als o T ex . C o d e Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2012); Pena , 1999 Tex. App. L EXI S 6354, at *1-2. We dismiss the appea l for want of jurisdiction. See Clark , 287 S.W .3d at 356.

__________________________________________ David Puryear , J ustice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton and Rose Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: F ebrua

ry 7, 2013 Do Not Publish

2
# Official Journal C 296A/3 Au

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 296A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 653 August 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 296A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 653 August 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Fusion for Energy Joint Undertaking |
| 2022/C 296 A/01 | Notice amending the notice of the European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (F4E) – Publication of a vacancy for the function of Director (Temporary Agent – Grade AD 14) – COM/2022/20086 ( OJ C 285 A, 26.7.2022 ) | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Fusion for Energy Joint Undertaking

2022/C 296 A/01

Notice amending the notice of the European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (F4E) – Publication of a vacancy for the function of Director (Temporary Agent – Grade AD 14) – COM/2022/20086 ( OJ C 285 A, 26.7.2022 )

( OJ C 285 A, 26.7.2022 )

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

V Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Fusion for Energy Joint Undertaking

| 3.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 296/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 296/1

---

Notice amending the notice of the European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (F4E) – Publication of a vacancy for the function of Director (Temporary Agent – Grade AD 14) – COM/2022/20086

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 285 A of 26 July 2022
  )

(2022/C 296 A/01)

On page 5, ‘Conditions of employment’, sixth paragraph:

| for: | ‘The post is available from 1 January 2024.’, |
| --- | --- |

for:

‘The post is available from 1 January 2024.’,

| read: | ‘The post is available from 1 January 2023.’. |
| --- | --- |

read:

read:

‘The post is available from 1 January 2023.’.

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report of The SCO Group, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q, for the three months ended January 31, 2005, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Bert B. Young, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 that:

 

1.                                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| By:    | /s/ Bert B. Young       |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Bert B. Young           |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                    |

 
| Date: | October 26, 2005 |
|-------|-----------------------|

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>		5
<LEGEND>	This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
            the Company's financial statements for year ended December 31, 1999
            and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
            statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>	1,000

<S>                                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                            DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                       49,823
<SECURITIES>                                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                67,357
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  6,456
<INVENTORY>                                                  23,411
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            153,048
<PP&E>                                                      272,555
<DEPRECIATION>                                              160,559
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              391,405
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        98,733
<BONDS>                                                     106,446
<COMMON>                                                     37,907
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                                  131,119
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                391,405
<SALES>                                                     702,512
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            702,512
<CGS>                                                       438,223
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               438,223
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            7,170
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              68,459
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 25,775
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          42,684
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 42,684
<EPS-BASIC>                                                  1.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  1.37


</TABLE>
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3448 — EDP/HIDROELECTRICA DEL CANTABRICO)

(2004/C 252/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 9 September 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
§ 40.10 Records—nature; confidentiality. ( a ) *Nature.* Records regarding the filing and disposition of grievances shall be collected and maintained systematically by the institution. Such records shall be preserved for at least three years following final disposition of the grievance. At a minimum, such records shall include aggregate information regarding the numbers, types and dispositions of grievances, as well as individual records of the date of and the reasons for each disposition at each stage of the procedure.
( b ) *Confidentiality.* Records regarding the participation of an individual in the grievance proceedings shall be considered confidential and shall be handled under the same procedures used to protect other confidential case records. Consistent with ensuring confidentiality, staff who are participating in the disposition of a grievance shall have access to records essential to the resolution of the grievance.
### §460n–3. Purposes and uses of area

#### (a) Public recreation, benefit, and use

Lake Mead National Recreation Area shall be administered by the Secretary of the Interior for general purposes of public recreation, benefit, and use, and in a manner that will preserve, develop, and enhance, so far as practicable, the recreation potential, and in a manner that will preserve the scenic, historic, scientific, and other important features of the area, consistently with applicable reservations and limitations relating to such area and with other authorized uses of the lands and properties within such area.

#### (b) Specific activities

In carrying out the functions prescribed by this subchapter, in addition to other related activities that may be permitted hereunder, the Secretary may provide for the following activities, subject to such limitations, conditions, or regulations as he may prescribe, and to such extent as will not be inconsistent with either the recreational use or the primary use of that portion of the area heretofore withdrawn for reclamation purposes:

(1) General recreation use, such as bathing, boating, camping, and picnicking;

(2) Grazing;

(3) Mineral leasing;

(4) Vacation cabin site use, in accordance with existing policies of the Department of the Interior relating to such use, or as such policies may be revised hereafter by the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 88–639, §4, Oct. 8, 1964, 78 Stat. 1040.)
§ 68.6 Service and filing of documents. ( a ) *Generally.* An original and four copies of the complaint shall be filed with the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer. An original and two copies of all other pleadings, including any attachments, shall be filed with the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer by the parties presenting the pleadings until an Administrative Law Judge is assigned to a case. Thereafter, all pleadings shall be delivered or mailed for filing to the Administrative Law Judge assigned to the case, and shall be accompanied by a certification indicating service to all parties of record. When a party is represented by an attorney, service shall be made upon the attorney. Except as required by § 68.54(c) and paragraph (c) of this section, service of any document upon any party may be made by personal delivery or by mailing a copy to the last known address. The person serving the document shall certify to the manner and date of service.
( b ) *Discovery.* The parties shall not file requests for discovery, answers, or responses thereto with the Administrative Law Judge. The Administrative Law Judge may, however, upon motion of a party or on his or her own initiative, order that such requests for discovery, answers, or responses thereto be filed.
( c ) *Where a time limit is imposed by statute, regulation, or order.* Pleadings and briefs may be filed by facsimile with either an Administrative Law Judge or, in the case of a complaint, with the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer, only to toll the running of a time limit. All original signed pleadings and other documents must be forwarded concurrently with the transmission of the facsimile. Any party filing documents by facsimile must include in the certification of service a certification that service on the opposing party has also been made by facsimile or by same-day hand delivery, or, if service by facsimile or same-day hand delivery cannot be made, a certification that the document has been served instead by overnight delivery service. In the case of requests for administrative review, briefs or other filings relating to review by the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer, filing, or service shall be made using the procedure set forth in this paragraph pursuant to § 68.54(c).
[Order No. 2203-99, 64 FR 7074, Feb. 12, 1999]
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted May 21, 2009

Decided May 21, 2009

Before

WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

JOHN L. COFFEY, Circuit Judge

DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge

No. 08

‐ 2307

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

‐ Appellee

,

v.

COREY TAYLOR,

Defendant

‐ Appellant. Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Northern District of Indiana,

Hammond Division.

2:06 CR 232 PS

Philip P. Simon,

Judge

.

O R D E R

Corey Taylor pleaded guilty to distributing crack, 21 U.S.C. 841(a)(1), and was

sentenced to 135 months’ imprisonment. As part of his plea agreement he waived his right

to appeal. Taylor appealed anyway, but his appointed lawyers have moved to withdraw

because they cannot discern a nonfrivolous basis for appeal. See Anders v. California

, 386

U.S. 738 (1967). Taylor has not responded to counsel’s submission under Circuit Rule 51(b). NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1No. 08

‐ 2307 Page 2

We limit our review to the potential issues counsel identify. United States v. Schuh

, 289 F.3d

968, 973

‐ 74 (7th Cir. 2002).

Taylor does not wish to have his guilty plea set aside, so counsel properly refrain

from examining the plea colloquy or the voluntariness of the plea. See United States v. Knox

,

287 F.3d 667, 671 (7th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, the plea agreement is enforceable and so is

the appellate waiver, see United States v. Wilson

, 481 F.3d 475, 483 (7th Cir. 2007); United

States v. Hare

, 269 F.3d 859, 860

‐ 61 (7th Cir. 2001), which renders this appeal frivolous.

Counsel’s motion is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
### §460gg–10. Ranching, grazing, etc., as valid uses of area

Ranching, grazing, farming, timber harvesting, and the occupation of homes and lands associated therewith, as they exist on December 31, 1975, are recognized as traditional and valid uses of the recreation area.

(Pub. L. 94–199, §13, Dec. 31, 1975, 89 Stat. 1122.)
§ 778.103 Eligibility and Certain Limitations. ( a ) *Applicants.* To be eligible for the Pilot Program, a State must: ( 1 ) Act by and through the Governor or top-ranking State transportation official who is charged with responsibility for highway construction;
( 2 ) Consent to a waiver of its sovereign immunity for the compliance, discharge, and enforcement of any responsibility under this Pilot Program;
( 3 ) Have previously assumed the responsibilities of the Secretary under 23 U.S.C. 327 related to environmental review, consultation, or other actions required under certain Federal environmental laws; and
( 4 ) Identify laws authorizing the State to take the actions necessary to carry out the alternative environmental review and approval procedures under State laws and regulations.
( b ) *Certain Limitations.* ( 1 ) State environmental laws and regulations may only be substituted as a means of complying with: ( i ) NEPA;
( ii ) Procedures governing the implementation of NEPA and related procedural laws under the authority of the Secretary, including 23 U.S.C. 109, 128, and 139; and ed regulations and executive orders. P>(2) Compliance with State environmental laws and regulations may not substitute for the Secretary's responsibilities regarding compliance with any other Federal environmental laws other than those set forth in (b)(1).