alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99(c)  Report of Audit Committee

GREAT NORTHERN IRON ORE PROPERTIES
Report of Audit Committee
Year ended December 31, 2003

The Audit Committee
oversees the Trusts financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of
Trustees. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements
and the reporting process including the systems of internal controls. In
fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed the
audited financial statements in the Annual Report with management including a
discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting
principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments and the clarity of
disclosures in the financial statements.

The Audit Committee
reviewed with the independent auditors, who are responsible for expressing an
opinion on the conformity of those audited financial statements with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States, their judgments as to the
quality, not just the acceptability, of the Trusts accounting principles
and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the Audit Committee
under auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. In addition,
the Audit Committee has discussed with the independent auditors the auditors'
independence from management and the Trust including the matters in the written
disclosures required by the Independence Standards Board.

The Audit Committee
discussed with the Trusts independent auditors the overall scope and plans
for their audit. The Audit Committee met with the independent auditors, with and
without management present, to discuss the results of their examination, their
evaluation of the Trusts internal controls and the overall quality of the
Trusts financial reporting.

The Board of Trustees
accepted the Audit Committees reappointment of Ernst & Young LLP as
independent auditors to the financial statements of the Trust for the year 2003.
All audit and non-audit services were preapproved by the Audit Committee.
Audit-related services pertain to testimony at the Trust's annual hearing of
accounts and tax services pertain to the Trusts tax return guide and
income tax returns. Estimated fees in 2003 for the annual audit services are
$46,750, for audit-related services are $1,300, for tax services are $25,000 and
for all other services are $0. Fees in 2002 for the annual audit services were
$41,700, for audit-related services were $1,250, for tax services were $3,000
and for all other services were $0.

In reliance on the reviews
and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board
of Trustees that the audited financial statements be included in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 for filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.



---

Exhibit 99(c)  Report of Audit Committee (continued)

Respectfully submitted,

/s/   Robert A. Stein
Robert A. Stein, Audit Committee Chairman

/s/   Roger W. Staehle
Roger W. Staehle, Audit Committee Member

/s/   John H. Roe, IIIJohn H. Roe, III, Audit Committee Member

Dated: February 12,
2004

---
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-74800, 333-23587, 333-59879 and 33-59875 of Hawthorne Financial Corporation
on Form S-8 of our report dated February 26, 1999 (March 30, 1999 as to Note N)
appearing in this annual report on Form 10-K of Hawthorne Financial Corporation
for the year ended December 31, 1998.
 
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
 
March 30, 1999
Los Angeles, California
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 11

GCR HOLDINGS LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARY
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE (unaudited)
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30
                                                1996              1995           1994
                                                ----              ----           ----
<S>                                          <C>           <C>           <C>
PRIMARY:

Net Income ................................   $    90,763   $    90,656   $    29,815

Weighted Average

Ordinary Shares Outstanding ...............    24,722,039    22,484,435    22,556,530

Dilutive Effect of:

       Stock Options ......................       267,467        35,442         7,745
       Warrants ...........................            --       489,951       120,330
                                             ============   ===========    ==========
                Total .....................    24,989,506    23,009,828    22,684,606
                                             ============   ===========    ==========

Net Income per Ordinary Share (after giving

     effect to the Share Split) ...........   $      3.63   $      3.94   $      1.32


FULLY DILUTED:

Net Income ................................   $    90,763   $    90,656   $    29,815

Weighted Average

Ordinary Shares Outstanding ...............    24,722,039    22,484,435    22,556,530

Dilutive Effect of:

       Stock Options ......................       292,689        40,606         7,745
       Warrants ...........................            --       558,339       120,330
                                             ============   ===========    ==========
                Total .....................    25,014,727    23,083,380    22,684,606
                                             ============   ===========    ==========

Net Income per Ordinary Share (after giving

     effect to the Share Split) ...........   $      3.63   $      3.93   $      1.32

</TABLE>

The calculation of fully diluted earnings per share is submitted in accordance
with Regulation S-K item 601 (b) (11) although not required by footnote 2 to
paragraph 14 of APB Opinion No. 15 because it results in dilution of less than
3%
KPMG LLP
4200 Wells Fargo Center
90 South Seventh Street
Minneapolis, MN  55402

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors of Allianz Life  Insurance  Company of North  America and
the Contract Owners of Allianz Life Variable Account B:

We  consent  to the use of our  report  dated  March 15,  2006 on the  financial
statements  of Allianz  Life  Variable  Account B and our report dated March 15,
2006 on the consolidated  financial statements of Allianz Life Insurance Company
of North America and  subsidiaries  included  herein and to the reference to our
Firm under the heading "EXPERTS" in the Statement of Additional Information.

Our report  dated March 15, 2006 on the  consolidated  financial  statements  of
Allianz Life  Insurance  Company of North America and  subsidiaries  refers to a
change in the Company's method of accounting for  non-traditional  long-duration
insurance contracts in 2004.

                                /s/ KPMG LLP
                                    KPMG LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota
April 24, 2006
#### Julia P. McSwegan v. Peter Stephan and Others.

Motion granted to extent stated in memorandum per curiam. Order to be settled on notice. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
§ 513.43 Inmate access to certain Bureau Program Statements. Inmates are encouraged to use the simple local access procedures described in this section to review certain Bureau Program Statements, rather than the FOIA procedures described in §§ 513.60 through 513.68 of this subpart. ( a ) For a current Bureau Program Statement containing rules (regulations published in the Federal Register and codified in 28 CFR), local access is available through the institution law library.
( b ) For a current Bureau Program Statement not containing rules (regulations published in the Federal Register and codified in 28 CFR), inmates may request that it be placed in the institution law library. Placement of a requested Program Statement in the law library is within the discretion of the Warden, based upon local institution conditions.
( c ) Inmates are responsible for the costs of making personal copies of any Program Statements maintained in the institution law library. For copies of Program Statements obtained under the FOIA procedures described in §§ 513.60 through 513.68 of this subpart, fees will be calculated in accordance with 28 CFR 16.10.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 98803 / October 27, 2023

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-21585

In the Matter of

Impact Theory, LLC,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

EXTENSION ORDER

The Division of Enforcement (“Division”) has requested an extension of time until July 

26, 2024, to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution under Rule 1101(a) of the Commission’s 

Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1101(a).

On August 28, 2023, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist 

Proceedings Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933, Making Findings, and 

Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order (the “Order”)1against Impact Theory, LLC (“Impact 

Theory” or the “Respondent”). In the Order, the Commission found that from October 13, 2021,

to December 6, 2021, Impact Theory, a media and entertainment company, offered and sold 

crypto asset securities known as Founder’s Keys in the form of purported non-fungible tokens, 

raising approximately $29.9 million worth of ether from at least hundreds of investors, including 

investors across the United States. The Commission found that Impact Theory violated Sections 

5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act by offering and selling these securities without having a 

1

 Securities Act Rel. No. 11226 (Aug. 28, 2023).
2

registration statement filed or in effect with the Commission or qualifying for an exemption from 

registration.

The Commission ordered the Respondent to pay $5,120,718.27 in disgorgement, 

$483,195.90 in prejudgment interest, and a $500,000.00 civil money penalty, for a total of 

$6,103,914.17, to the Commission. The Commission also created a Fair Fund, pursuant to 

Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, so the penalty collected, along with the 

disgorgement and interest collected, can be distributed to harmed investors (the “Fair Fund”).

The Fair Fund consists of the $6,103,914.17 paid by the Respondent. The Fair Fund has 

been deposited in a Commission-designated account at the U.S. Department of the Treasury, and 

any accrued interest will be added to the Fair Fund.

In its request for an extension of time, the Division states that additional time is needed to 

complete the fund administrator solicitation and appointment process, develop the distribution 

methodology, and prepare the proposed plan of distribution. 

Accordingly, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Division’s 

request for an extension of time until July 26, 2024, to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution is 

granted.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.2

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

2

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(i).
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 70615 October 4, 2013

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-15507

____________________________________

 :

In the Matter of :

 :

JPMorgan Chase & Co., : ORDER APPOINTING 

 : TAX ADMINISTRATOR

:

Respondent(s). :

____________________________________:

By order dated January 17, 2013, the Commission issued the “Omnibus Order 

Directing the Appointment of Tax Administrator in Administrative Proceedings that 

Establish Distribution Funds” (“Omnibus Order”), Rel. No. 34-68683 authorizing the 

Secretary to issue orders during calendar years 2013 - 2015 appointing, upon request by 

the Commission staff, Damasco and Associates LLP (“Damasco”), a certified public 

accounting firm located in Half Moon Bay, California, as tax administrator (“Tax 

Administrator”) in administrative proceedings where the distribution fund may incur 

tax-related obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) under the Department of 

the Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

On September 30, 2013, the Commission staff requested, pursuant to the 

Omnibus Order, the appointment of Damasco as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in 

the above-referenced proceeding. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Damasco, pursuant to and in accordance with the Omnibus 

Order, is appointed the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced 

proceeding. 

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Elizabeth M. Murphy

Secretary
### §410ww–25. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated annually to the Commission to carry out its duties under this subchapter $350,000, except that the Federal contribution to the Commission shall not exceed 50 percent of the annual costs to the Commission in carrying out those duties.

(Pub. L. 102–419, title II, §205, Oct. 16, 1992, 106 Stat. 2148.)
### §402. Existing claims, locations, or entries not affected; exchange of lands

Nothing herein contained shall affect any valid claim, location, or entry existing under the land laws of the United States prior to June 7, 1924, whether for homestead, mineral, right-of-way, or any other purpose whatsoever, or shall affect the rights of any such claimant, locator, or entryman to the full use and enjoyment of his land. The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to exchange, in his discretion, alienated lands in Bryce Canyon National Park for unappropriated and unreserved public lands of equal value and approximately equal area in the State of Utah outside of said park.

(June 7, 1924, ch. 305, §3, 43 Stat. 594; Feb. 25, 1928, ch. 102, §1, 45 Stat. 147.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Herein, referred to in text, means act June 7, 1924, which is classified to sections 346, 401 and 402 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

The land laws of the United States, referred to in text, are classified generally to Title 43, Public Lands.

#### Codification

The last sentence of this section as originally enacted is expressly applicable also to Zion National Park. See section 346 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Utah National Park" changed to "Bryce Canyon National Park" by section 1 of act Feb. 25, 1928, classified to section 402a of this title.
EXHIBIT 31.2





RULE
13A-14(A)/15D-14(A) CERTIFICATION





I, Ciaran
Egan, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FreeStar Technology
Corporation;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [omitted pursuant to extended compliance period] for
the registrant and have:





(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)
[omitted pursuant to extended compliance period]





(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,process, summarize and
report financial information; and





(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:  February
      19, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Ciaran
      EganCiaran
      EganSecretary/Treasurer/Chief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
§ 90.63 Eligibility. ( a ) *Eligible entities.* Eligible entities are described in 42 U.S.C. 3796hh(c).
( b ) *Certifications* — ( 1 ) *State, local, and tribal governments.* State, local, and tribal government applicants must certify that they meet the requirements of 42 U.S.C. 3796hh(c)(A)-(E) or that they will meet the requirements by the statutory deadline.
( 2 ) *Courts.* Court applicants must certify that they meet the requirements of 42 U.S.C. 3796hh(c)(C)-(E) or that they will meet the requirements by the statutory deadline.
( 3 ) *State, tribal, or territorial domestic violence or sexual assault coalitions or victim service providers.* Applicants that are domestic violence or sexual assault coalitions or other victim service providers must partner with a State, local, or tribal government. The partner government must certify that it meets the requirements of 42 U.S.C. 3796hh(c)(A)-(E) or that it will meet the requirements by the statutory deadline.
( 4 ) *Letters.* Eligible applicants or partners must submit a letter with proper certifications signed by the chief executive officer of the State, local government, or tribal government participating in the project, in order to satisfy these statutory requirements. OVW will not accept submission of statutes, laws or policies in lieu of such a letter.
( c ) *Partnerships* — ( 1 ) *Governments and courts.* All State, local, and tribal government and court applicants are required to enter into a formal collaboration with victim service providers and, as appropriate, population specific organizations. Sexual assault, domestic violence, dating violence, or stalking victim service providers must be involved in the development and implementation of the project. In addition to the requirements of 42 U.S.C. 13925, victim service providers should meet the following criteria: ( i ) Address a demonstrated need in their communities by providing services that promote the dignity and self-sufficiency of victims, improve their access to resources, and create options for victims seeking safety from perpetrator violence; and
( ii ) Do not engage in or promote activities that compromise victim safety.
( 2 ) *Coalitions and victim service providers.* All State, tribal, or territorial domestic violence or sexual assault coalition and other victim service provider applicants are required to enter into a formal collaboration with a State, Indian tribal government or unit of local government, and, as appropriate, population specific organizations.
§ 192.4 Adoption of drug offender's driver's license suspension. ( a ) The Secretary shall withhold 8 percent of the amount required to be apportioned to any State under each of sections 104(b)(1) and (b)(2) of title 23 of the U.S.C. on the first day of the next fiscal year if the State does not meet the requirements of this section.
( b ) A State meets the requirements of this section if: ( 1 ) The State has enacted and is enforcing a law that requires in all circumstances, or requires in the absence of compelling circumstances warranting an exception: ( i ) The revocation, or suspension for at least 6 months, of the driver's license of any individual who is convicted, after the enactment of such law, of ( A ) Any violation of the Controlled Substances Act, or
( B ) Any drug offense, and
( ii ) A delay in the issuance or reinstatement of a driver's license to such an individual for at least 6 months after the individual otherwise would have been eligible to have a driver's license issued or reinstated if the individual does not have a driver's license, or the driver's license of the individual is suspended, at the time the individual is so convicted, or
( 2 ) The Governor of the State or their designee: ( i ) Submits to the Secretary through its respective FHWA Division Administrator a written certification stating that the Governor is opposed to the enactment or enforcement in the State of a law described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section relating to the revocation, suspension, issuance, or reinstatement of driver's licenses to convicted drug offenders; and
( ii ) Submits to the Secretary a written certification that the legislature (including both Houses where applicable) has adopted a resolution expressing its opposition to a law described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
( c ) A State that makes exceptions for compelling circumstances must do so in accordance with a State law, regulation, binding policy directive or statewide published guidelines establishing the conditions for making such exceptions and in exceptional circumstances specific to the offender.
## St at e of Ne w York Supre me Court , Appe llat e D i vi s i on T h i rd J udi cial D e

part me n t Decided and Entered: September 22, 2016 522256

________________________________ In the Matter of MICHAEL JORGENSEN, Petitioner, v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

________________________________ Calendar Date: August 8, 2016 Before: McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Devine, Clark and Aarons, JJ.

__________ Michael Jorgensen, Pine City, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. Determination confirmed. No opinion. McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Devine, Clark and Aarons, JJ., concur.-2- 522256

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court