alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2023

- 1274

_____________________________
L EWIS A LBERT W INN , III
, Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Coleman Lee Robinson , Judge

. June 21, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , R OBERTS , and R AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Lori A. Willner, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 85089 / February 11, 2019

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-18884

In the Matter of

Pennant Management, Inc.

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

EXTENSION ORDER

The Division of Enforcement (“Division”) has requested an extension of time until 

August 30, 2019 to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution under Rule 1101(a) of the 

Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans, 17 CFR § 201.1101(a).

On November 6, 2018, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Administrative and 

Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the Investment 

Advisers Act of 1940, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and Cease-andDesist Order (“Order”)1

against Pennant Management, Inc. (“Pennant”). In the Order, 

Pennant was ordered to pay a $400,000.00 civil money penalty to the Commission. A Fair 

Fund was created pursuant to Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, so the 

penalty could be distributed to investors harmed by Pennant’s conduct described in the Order.

The Division now requests an extension of time because time is needed for further 

evaluation, analysis, and consultation with other offices in order to develop a distribution plan 

and to present the recommendation to the Commission.2

 

1 Advisers Act Rel. No.5061 (Nov. 6, 2018).

2

 This matter has been delayed due to the government shutdown.
2

Accordingly, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Division’s 

request for an extension of time until August 30, 2019 to submit a Proposed Plan of

Distribution is granted.

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority. 

Brent J. Fields

Secretary
Editorial Note on Part 1215
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1215 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003.

§ 1215.6 Departure from the Canal Zone, the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, or outlying possessions of the United States. ( a ) In addition to the restrictions and prohibitions imposed by the provisions of this part upon the departure of aliens from the United States, any alien who seeks to depart from the Canal Zone, the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, or an outlying possession of the United States shall comply with such other restrictions and prohibitions as may be imposed by regulations prescribed, with the concurrence of the Administrator of the Bureau of Security and Consular Affairs and the Commissioner, by the Governor of the Canal Zone, the High Commissioner of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, or by the governor of an outlying possession of the United States, respectively. No alien shall be prevented from departing from such zone, territory, or possession without first being accorded a hearing as provided in §§ 1215.4 and 1215.5.
( b ) The Governor of the Canal Zone, the High Commissioner of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, or the governor of any outlying possession of the United States shall have the authority to designate any employee or class of employees of the United States as hearing officers for the purpose of conducting the hearing referred to in paragraph (a) of this section. The hearing officer so designated shall exercise the same powers, duties, and functions as are conferred upon special inquiry officers under the provisions of this part. The chief executive officer of such zone, territory, or possession shall, in lieu of the regional commissioner, review the recommended decision of the hearing officer, and shall render a decision in any case referred to him, basing it on evidence in the record and on any evidence or information of a confidential or a security nature which he deems pertinent.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

RICHMOND DIVISION 

ORDER 

In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is 

hereby 

ORDERED that the Complaint filed by Black Diamond Commercial 

Finance, LLC, is DISMISSED, and it is further 

In re: 

Patriot Coal Corp., et al., 

 Debtors. 

 

Case No. 15-32450-KLP 

Chapter 11 

Jointly Administered 

 

Black Diamond Commercial Finance, LLC, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

Virginia Conservation Legacy Fund, Inc., and 

ERP Compliant Fuels, Inc., 

 Defendants. 

 

Adv. Proc. No. 16-03105-KLP

Virginia Conservation Legacy Fund, Inc., and 

ERP Compliant Fuels, Inc., 

 Counter-Claimants, 

 v. 

Black Diamond Commercial Finance, LLC, 

 Counter-Defendant. 

Case 16-03105-KLP Doc 416 Filed 09/28/18 Entered 09/28/18 13:38:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
2 

ORDERED that the Counterclaim filed by Virginia Conservation 

Legacy Fund, Inc., and ERP Compliant Fuels, Inc., is DISMISSED. 

Date: September 28, 2018 /s/ Keith L. Phillips 

United States Bankruptcy Judge 

Copies: 

Dianne F. Coffino 

Covington & Burling LLP 

620 Eighth Avenue 

New York, NY 10018-1405 

David W. Haller 

Covington & Burling LLP 

620 8th Avenue 

New York, NY 10018 

Dion W. Hayes 

McGuireWoods LLP 

800 East Canal Street 

Richmond, VA 23219 

John H. Maddock III 

McGuireWoods LLP 

Gateway Plaza 

800 East Canal Street 

Richmond, VA 23219 

Micaela R.H. McMurrough 

Covington & Burling LLP 

620 8th Avenue 

New York, NY 10018 

C. William Phillips 

Covington & Burling LLP 

620 8th Avenue 

New York, NY 10018 

David Zorian Pinsky 

Covington & Burling LLP 

620 8th Avenue 

New York, NY 10018 

Entered on Docket: September 28, 2018

Case 16-03105-KLP Doc 416 Filed 09/28/18 Entered 09/28/18 13:38:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3
3 

Patrick J. Potter 

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP 

1200 Seventeenth Street NW 

Washington, DC 20036 

Joshua I. Schlenger 

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP 

1540 Broadway 

New York, NY 10036 

Jonathan M. Sperling 

Covington & Burling LLP 

620 8th Avenue 

New York, NY 10018 

William M. Sullivan, Jr. 

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP 

2300 N. Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20037 

William Michael Sullivan 

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP 

1200 Seventeenth Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20036 

Andrew M. Troop 

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP 

1540 Broadway 

New York, NY 10036 

Case 16-03105-KLP Doc 416 Filed 09/28/18 Entered 09/28/18 13:38:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3
### §6234. Relationship to other laws

Except as specifically provided by this chapter, nothing in this chapter supersedes or otherwise affects any provision of law, regulation, or policy regarding the issuance or administration of authorizations for organizational camps regarding the occupancy and use of National Forest System lands.

(Pub. L. 108–7, div. F, title V, §505, Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 297.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", which was translated as reading "this title", meaning title V of div. F of Pub. L. 108–7, known as the National Forest Organizational Camp Fee Improvement Act of 2003, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PremierWest Bancorp (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Fowler, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                       
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period certified.
|  

This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any of the Companys filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise be deemed to be filed as part of the Report or under such Acts.

|Date: August 11, 2008 |  | /s/ MICHAEL
     D. FOWLER       
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------
|                      |  | Michael
     D. Fowler           
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer and      
|                      |  | Principal Accounting
     Officer

---
U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

To Whom It May Concern,

We are sending our request for exemption under the FAA Regulations in regards to 

operation of DJI Phantom 3 for the purpose of Aerial photography and videography, data 

collection, agricultural assessment, news gathering, training and education, support 

services for public entities, inspections of structures, real estate photos and videos, 

closed-set film and movie production, web videos.

REQUEST AN EXEMPTION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 14 OF THE 

CODE

OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS

SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 

91.409(a)(1) &

(a)(2), AND 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF DJI 

Phantom

3 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF

THE FAA MODERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012 (PUBLIC LAW 112-95)

Best,

Sol Tucker

Executive Director

Push Media Group
_______________________________________________________________________
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of BlastGard International, Inc., that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the company on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended June 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the companys
financial condition and results of operations.



August 12, 2005



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|/s/ James F. Gordon                     
|James F. Gordon, Chief Executive Officer
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

Washington, D.C. 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 92765 / August 25, 2021

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension of trading 

in the securities of Giggles N’ Hugs, Inc. (GIGL) commencing at 9:30 a.m. EDT on August 26, 

2021 and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EDT on September 9, 2021.

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of the foregoing company due 

to a lack of current and accurate information about the company because it has not filed certain 

periodic reports with the Commission. This order was entered pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act).

The Commission cautions brokers, dealers, shareholders and prospective purchasers that they 

should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available 

information and any information subsequently issued by this company.

Brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11, at 

the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered relating to the securities 

of the subject company unless and until the broker or dealer has strictly complied with all of the 

provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is required by the rule, it 

should refrain from entering quotations relating to the securities of this company that has been 

subject to the trading suspension until such time as it has familiarized itself with the rule and is 

certain that all of its provisions have been met. Any broker or dealer with questions regarding

the rule should contact the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, DC 

at (202) 551-5777. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation which is in violation of the rule,

the Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement action. 

If any broker, dealer or other person has any information which may relate to this matter, they

should immediately communicate it to the Delinquent Filings Branch of the Division of 

Enforcement at (202) 551-5466, or by e-mail at DelinquentFilings@sec.gov.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 02326**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 02326\02326_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 02326\02326_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 02326\02326_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 02326\02326_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02326\02326_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02326\02326_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02326\02326_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02326\02326_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 02326\Certification Statement Plant ID 02326.pdf Plant certification statement x 

### 02326\Supporting Documentation\02326_Question A2-3 Attachment.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey



### 02326\Supporting Documentation\02326_Question A5-2 Attachments.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 02326\Supporting Documentation\02326_Question A5-3 Attachment.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 02326\Supporting Documentation\02326_Question C2-31 Attachment.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 02326\Supporting Documentation\02326_Question C3-29 Attachment (CBI).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 02326\Supporting Documentation\02326_Question C3-36 Attachment.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 02326\Supporting Documentation\02326_Question D3-1 Attachment.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

_________________ Division 

In re Case No. 

 Debtor(s) Chapter 

ORDER FOR RETURN OF UNCLAIMED FUNDS 

A Motion for Return of Unclaimed Funds having been filed pursuant to Local 

Bankruptcy Rule 3011-1, said motion having been served on the United States Trustee and the 

United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia and there being no objections filed; it 

is

ORDERED that the unclaimed funds in the amount of $ ,

currently on deposit with the Treasury of the United States, be returned to: 

 Let the Clerk give notice of entry of this order to the debtor(s), attorney for debtor(s), 

movant, attorney for movant, if applicable, trustee and United States Trustee. 

Date: __________________________ _______________________________________ 

 United States Bankruptcy Judge 

NOTICE OF JUDGMENT OR ORDER 

 ENTERED ON DOCKET: 

_____________________ 

 

pc: Financial Administrator 

[ounclmfd ver. 03/06] 

Alexandria

Charles Norman Adcox 17-10314-KHK

13

1005.00

Charles Norman Adcox

c/o John Paul Goetz of John Goetz Law, PLC

7202 Little Thames Drive

Gainesville, VA 20155

Feb 3 2020 /s/ Klinette H. Kindred

February 4, 2020

Case 17-10314-KHK Doc 28 Filed 02/04/20 Entered 02/04/20 09:01:31 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 78370 / July 20, 2016

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-11578

In the Matter of

 CIHC, INC., CONSECO SERVICES, 

LLC, and CONSECO EQUITY SALES, 

INC.,

Respondents.

ORDER DIRECTING DISBURSEMENT 

OF FAIR FUND

On January 19, 2010, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission 

(“Commission”) published an Amended Notice of Proposed Plan of Distribution and 

Opportunity for Comment (“Notice”) pursuant to Rule 1103 of the Commission’s Rules of Fair 

Fund and Disgorgement Plans, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1103.

1

The Notice advised all interested parties 

that they could obtain a copy of the Distribution Plan from the Commission’s public website or 

by submitting a written request to George S. Canellos, Regional Director, United States 

Securities and Exchange Commission, 3 World Financial Center, Room 400, New York, NY 

10281. The Notice also advised that all persons desiring to comment on the Distribution Plan 

had to submit their comments, in writing, within 30 days of the date of the Notice. No comments 

were received in response to the Notice. On February 26, 2010, the Commission issued an Order 

Approving Plan, Appointing a Fund Administrator, and Waiving Bond.2

The Distribution Plan provides for the distribution of the disgorgement and civil penalties 

paid by the Respondents, plus any accumulated interest earned, less a reserve for taxes and any 

amounts determined to be payable upon appeal, to investors according to the methodology set 

forth in the Distribution Plan. The Independent Distribution Consultant (“IDC”) has conducted 

two rounds of distributions to date.

3

The IDC has submitted to the Commission staff a validated 

payment file for the third round of distribution. Commission staff has reviewed the validated 

payment file and requests that, pursuant to Rule 1101(b)(6) of the Commission’s Rules on Fair 

 

1 Exchange Act Rel. No. 61209A (Jan. 19, 2010).

2 Exchange Act Rel. No. 61601 (Feb. 26, 2010).

3

 In the first round, $4,263,506.27 and in the second round, $2,864,027.70 were distributed in accordance with the 

Distribution Plan. See Exchange Act Release Nos. 72999 (Sept. 4, 2014) and 74522 (Mar. 17, 2015), respectively.
2

Fund and Disgorgement Plans, the Commission authorize the distribution of $2,524,880.83 to 

investors in accordance with the Distribution Plan.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Commission staff shall transfer $1,824,880.83

from the Fair Fund to U.S. Bank, NA, and the Fund Administrator shall distribute such monies to 

investors, along with $700,000 in funds held at U.S. Bank, N.A., as provided for in the 

Distribution Plan.

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Brent J. Fields

Secretary
#### Dwayne E. ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Arthur T. BENNETT, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-6082.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

April 30, 2002.

Before RYAN, BOGGS, and COLE, Circuit Judges.

*ORDER*

Pro se Tennessee prisoner Dwayne E. Anderson appeals the district court judgment that dismissed his civil rights suit for want of jurisdiction. The case has been referred to this panel pursuant to Rule 34(j)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. We unanimously agree that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

Seeking monetary damages, injunctive relief, and a declaratory judgment, Anderson sued a criminal court judge, a judge of the court of criminal appeals, two members of the disciplinary council for the Tennessee court of the judiciary, and a state assistant attorney general. Anderson claimed that the criminal court judge violated his constitutional rights by failing to enter a written judgment memorializing the denial of his petition for state post-conviction relief. Anderson claimed that the others failed in their duty to punish this judge or to force this judge to act.

The district court dismissed Anderson’s suit for want of jurisdiction.

In his timely appeal, Anderson argues that the district court erred by dismissing his suit. The defendants have not been served and have not filed a brief.

Our review is de novo. *Greater Detroit Res. Recovery Auth. v. United States EPA*916 F.2d 317, 319 (6th Cir.1990). Upon consideration, we conclude that the district court properly dismissed the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. *District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman,*460 U.S. 462, 486, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); *Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.,*263 U.S. 413, 415-16, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment for the reason stated by that court in its memorandum opinion entered on July 26, 2001. Rule 34(j)(2)(C), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
Case 16-36225-KRH Doc 20 Filed 02/16/17 Entered 02/16/17 12:52:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the
quarterly report of NMXS.com, Inc. (the "Company") on Amendment No. 1
to Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned principal executive officer and the principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  April
4, 2005





/s/ Richard Govatski

Richard Govatski, President

(Principal Executive Officer)





/s/ Teresa Dickey

Teresa Dickey, Treasurer

(Principal Financial Officer)