alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 475 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 475

    Recognizing the leading role of Utahns in the fight for women's 
  suffrage and celebrating the sesquicentennial of the first votes by 
    women under the equal suffrage law of Utah on February 14, 1870.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 16, 2020

     Mr. Romney (for himself and Mr. Lee) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                           February 13, 2020

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Recognizing the leading role of Utahns in the fight for women's 
  suffrage and celebrating the sesquicentennial of the first votes by 
    women under the equal suffrage law of Utah on February 14, 1870.

Whereas, on February 10, 1870, the territorial legislature of Utah passed an Act 
        granting women the right to vote, which was signed into law on February 
        12, 1870, by Acting Governor Stephen Mann;
Whereas, on February 14, 1870, women voted in the Salt Lake City election, 
        becoming the first women to vote under an equal suffrage law within what 
        is now the United States;
Whereas, in 1887, Congress revoked the voting rights of women in Utah;
Whereas, on November 5, 1895, the new Utah Constitution was adopted with a 
        provision stating, ``The rights of citizens of the State of Utah to vote 
        and hold office shall not be denied or abridged on account of sex. Both 
        male and female citizens of this State shall enjoy equally all civil, 
        political and religious rights and privileges.'';
Whereas, on November 3, 1896, Martha Maria Hughes Cannon, who will be honored by 
        a statue in the United States Capitol in 2020, was elected to the Utah 
        State Senate and became the first woman to serve as a State senator in 
        the United States; and
Whereas, in 1919, women's suffrage was extended to all United States citizens 
        with the adoption of the 19th Amendment to the Constitution of the 
        United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes the leading role of Utahns in the fight for 
        women's suffrage and the adoption of the 19th Amendment to the 
        Constitution of the United States guaranteeing that the ``right 
        of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or 
        abridged by the United States or by any State on account of 
        sex''; and
            (2) celebrates the sesquicentennial of the first votes by 
        women under the equal suffrage law of Utah on February 14, 
        1870.
                                 <all>
```
#### Joseph K. Wonderling, Appellant-Respondent, v CSX Transportation, Inc., Respondent-Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 839]

*1245Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Thomas A. Stander, J.), entered January 31, 2006. The order denied plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on liability on the Labor Law § 240 (1) claim and denied defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this Labor Law and common-law negligence action seeking damages for injuries he sustained when he fell approximately 26 feet to the ground while disassembling scaffolding on the Lyndon Road Pedestrian Bridge Project located on defendant’s property. We conclude that Supreme Court properly denied plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on liability on the Labor Law § 240 (1) claim, but our reasoning differs from that of the court. Plaintiffs initial submissions in support of the motion are insufficient to establish plaintiffs entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, and the reply papers submitted by plaintiff are not considered in evaluating whether he met his initial burden *(see Seefeldt v Johnson,*13 AD3d 1203 [2004]).

We further conclude that the court properly denied defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint because defendant failed to establish that plaintiffs own actions in attempting to disassemble the scaffolding in dangerously wet conditions were, as a matter of law, the sole proximate cause of plaintiffs injuries. Here, defendant failed to establish that the scaffolding was properly constructed and that, but for the wet conditions, plaintiff would not have fallen *(see Tronolone v Praxair, Inc.,*22 AD3d 1031, 1033 [2005]). Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant met its initial burden, we conclude that plaintiff raised triable issues of fact by submitting his testimony from the General Municipal Law § 50-h hearing in which he testified that the scaffolding was unstable, causing him to fall. Although defendant submitted evidence that plaintiff fell when his foot slipped on the wet slippery steel of the scaffolding, that plaintiff was told not to disassemble the scaffolding that day because of the wet conditions, and that safety harnesses were available, defendant did not thereby es*1246tablish as a matter of law that the actions of plaintiff were the sole proximate cause of his injuries *(see Hagins v State of New York,*81 NY2d 921, 922-923 [1993]; *see also Whiting v Dave Hennig, Inc.,*28 AD3d 1105 [2006]). We thus conclude on the record before us that there are issues of fact whether the actions of plaintiff were the sole proximate cause of his injuries *(see Andrews v Ryan*Homes, *Inc.,*27 AD3d 1197 [2006]; *cf. Robinson v East Med. Ctr., LP,*6 NY3d 550, 554-555 [2006]; *Blake v Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of N.Y. City,*1 NY3d 280, 290-291 [2003]). Present—Kehoe, J.P., Martoche, Centra, Green and Pine, JJ. *[See 11*Misc 3d 1061(A), 2006 NY Slip Op 50337(U) (2006).]
<PAGE>
                                                   FLAG Telecom Holdings Limited
                                                               Emporium Building
                                                                       4th Floor
                                                               69th Front Street
                                                                 Hamilton, HM 12
                                                                         BERMUDA


18 February 1999

AT&T Capital Corporation
c/o New Court Capital Inc.
2 Gatehall Drive
1st Floor
Parsippany
NJ 07054
USA

We agree that registration rights applicable to the Class B shares held by you
in the capital of FLAG Limited (the "Shares"), shall apply equally to the
ordinary shares in the capital of FLAG Telecom Holdings Limited which are to be
issued to you in exchange for the transfer of the Shares to us.

We also agree that FLAG Telecom Holdings Limited shall be responsible for, and
shall indemnify AT&T Capital Corporation from and against, any issue, transfer
tax, stamp duty or other taxes that may be payable in respect of any issue,
delivery or transfer of the Shares to us (it being understood that such taxes
shall not include taxes levied on AT&T Capital Corporation's income, gross
receipts, capital gains or net income).

Regards.



Director
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PremierWest Bancorp (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John L. Anhorn, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                       
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period certified.
|  

This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any of the Companys filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise be deemed to be filed as part of the Report or under such Acts.

|Date: July 27, 2007 |  | /s/ JOHN L. ANHORN     
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                    |  | John L. Anhorn         
|                    |  | Chief Executive Officer

---
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 46 

To correct the enrollment of S. 2330. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2020 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL (for himself and Mr. MORAN) submitted the following 

concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

To correct the enrollment of S. 2330. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of S. 2330, an Act 

3 to amend the Ted Stevens Olympic and Amateur Sports 

4 Act to provide for congressional oversight of the board of 

5 directors of the United States Olympic and Paralympic 

6 Committee and to protect amateur athletes from emo7 tional, physical, and sexual abuse, and for other purposes, 

8 the Secretary of the Senate shall— 

9 (1) in subsection (b)(2)(D) of section 220504 of 

10 title 36, United States Code, as amended by section 

11 6(b)(2) of the Act, strike ‘‘percent’’; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 46 ATS 

1 (2) in subsection (a)(1)(H) of section 220541 of 

2 title 36, United States Code, as added by section 

3 8(a)(1)(B) of the Act, strike ‘‘in a manner than’’ 

4 and insert ‘‘in a manner that’’; 

5 (3) in subsection (f)(4)(B) of section 220541 of 

6 title 36 United States Code, as added by section 

7 8(a)(1)(E) of the Act, insert ‘‘and the Committee on 

8 the Judiciary’’ after ‘‘the Committee on Energy and 

9 Commerce’’; 

10 (4) amend paragraph (1) of section 220541(g) 

11 of title 36, United States Code, as added by section 

12 8(a)(1)(E) of the Act, to read as follows: 

13 ‘‘(1) MANDATORY PAYMENTS.— 

14 ‘‘(A) FISCAL YEAR 2021.—On January 4, 

15 2021, the corporation shall make a mandatory 

16 payment of $20,000,000 to the Center for oper17 ating costs of the Center for fiscal year 2021. 

18 ‘‘(B) SUBSEQUENT FISCAL YEARS.—For 

19 fiscal year 2022 and each fiscal year thereafter, 

20 the corporation shall make a mandatory pay21 ment of $20,000,000 to the Center not later 

22 than the close of business on the first regular 

23 business day in January.’’; and 

24 (5) in subsection (h)(2)(C)(iii) of section 

25 220541 of title 36, United States Code, as added by 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•SCON 46 ATS 

1 section 8(a)(1)(E) of the Act, insert ‘‘and the Com2 mittee on the Judiciary’’ after ‘‘the Committee on 

3 Energy and Commerce’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
### §583k–3. Priority trail maintenance program

#### (a) Selection

In accordance with subsections (b) and (c), not later than 6 months after November 28, 2016, the Secretary of Agriculture shall select no fewer than 9 and no more than 15 priority areas for increased trail maintenance accomplishments.

#### (b) Criteria

Priority areas shall include a well-defined region on National Forest System land where the lack of trail maintenance has—

(1) reduced access to public land;

(2) led to an increase, or risk of increase, in harm to natural resources;

(3) jeopardized public safety;

(4) resulted in trails being impassible by the intended managed users; or

(5) increased future deferred trail maintenance costs.

#### (c) Requirements

In selecting priority areas, the Secretary shall—

(1) consider any public input on priority areas received within 3 months of November 28, 2016;

(2) consider the range of trail users (including motorized and non-motorized trail users); and

(3) include at least one priority area in each region of the United States Forest Service.

#### (d) Increased trail maintenance

#### (1) In general

Within 6 months of the selection of priority areas under subsection (a), and in accordance with paragraph (2), the Secretary shall develop an approach to substantially increase trail maintenance accomplishments within each priority area.

#### (2) Contents

In developing the approach under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall—

(A) consider any public input on trail maintenance priorities and needs within any priority area;

(B) consider the costs and benefits of increased trail maintenance within each priority area; and

(C) incorporate partners and volunteers in the trail maintenance.

#### (3) Required trail maintenance

Utilizing the approach developed under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall substantially increase trail maintenance within each priority area.

#### (e) Coordination

The regional volunteer and partnership coordinators may be responsible for assisting partner organizations in developing and implementing volunteer and partnership projects to increase trail maintenance within priority areas.

#### (f) Revision

The Secretary shall periodically review the priority areas to determine whether revisions are necessary and may revise the priority areas, including the selection of new priority areas or removal of existing priority areas, at his sole discretion.

(Pub. L. 114–245, §5, Nov. 28, 2016, 130 Stat. 993.)
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 336 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 336

Instructing the managers on the part of the Senate on the bill S. 1790 
   (116th Congress) to insist upon the members of the conference to 
 consider potential commonsense solutions regarding family and medical 
 leave, including voluntary compensatory time programs and incentives 
                         through the tax code.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 2019

Ms. Ernst submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Instructing the managers on the part of the Senate on the bill S. 1790 
   (116th Congress) to insist upon the members of the conference to 
 consider potential commonsense solutions regarding family and medical 
 leave, including voluntary compensatory time programs and incentives 
                         through the tax code.

    Resolved, That the managers on the part of the Senate at the 
conference on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses on the House 
amendment to the bill S. 1790 be instructed to insist upon the members 
of the conference consider potential commonsense solutions regarding 
family and medical leave, including voluntary compensatory time 
programs and incentives through the tax code.
                                 <all>
```
(March 12, 1943.)

#### Jefferson Title and Mortgage Corporation, Respondent, v. Blue Spruce Realty Corporation et al., Defendants, and Jane M. Pindell, Defendant-Appellant. Jefferson Title and Mortgage Corporation, Respondent, v. Blue Spruce Realty Corporation et al., Defendants, and D. Sterrett Pindell et al., Defendants-Appellants.

(Appeals Nos. 1 and 3.)

(Appeal No. 2.)

Cars-well, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
### §45c. Prior claims, locations, and entries; permits for use of natural resources

Nothing herein contained shall affect any valid existing claim, location, or entry established prior to July 3, 1926, under the land laws of the United States, whether for homestead, mineral, right-of-way, or any other purpose whatsoever, or shall affect the rights of any such claimant, locator, or entryman to the full use and enjoyment of his land: Provided, That under rules and regulations to be prescribed by him the Secretary of the Interior may issue permits to any bona fide claimant, entryman, landowner, or lessee of land within the boundaries herein established to secure timber for use on and for the improvement of his land; and he shall also have authority to issue, under rules and regulations to be prescribed by him, grazing permits and authorize the grazing of livestock on the lands within said park at fees not to exceed those charged by the Forest Service on adjacent areas, so long as such timber cutting and grazing are not detrimental to the primary purpose for which such park is created: Provided, That no permit, license, lease, or authorization for dams, conduits, reservoirs, power houses, transmission lines, or other works for storage or carriage of water, or for the development, transmission, or utilization of power within the limits of said park as constituted by said sections, shall be granted or made without specific authority of Congress.

(July 3, 1926, ch. 744, §3, 44 Stat. 820.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Herein, referred to in text, means act July 3, 1926, which is classified to sections 45a, 45b to 45e, and 688 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.
_________________________________________________________________________ 

_________________________________________________________________________ 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

before the 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 98985 / November 20, 2023 

WHISTLEBLOWER AWARD PROCEEDING 

File No. 2024-2 

In the Matter of the Claim for an Award 

in connection with 

Redacted Redacted

Notice of Covered Action 

Redacted

ORDER DETERMINING WHISTLEBLOWER AWARD CLAIMS 

Redacted

(“Claimant 1”), 

Redacted ***

The Claims Review Staff (“CRS”) issued a Preliminary Determination recommending 

Redacted Redacted

percent ( ***

that (“Claimant 2”), (“Claimant 3”) 

and (“Claimant 4”) (collectively, “Joint Claimants”) receive a joint whistleblower 

award of %) of the monetary sanctions collected, or to be collected, in the 

above-referenced Covered Action (the “Covered Action”), which based on current collections 

would result in no payment.1 Joint Claimants did not submit a response contesting the 

Preliminary Determination. 

The recommendation of the CRS is adopted. The record demonstrates that Joint 

Claimants voluntarily provided original information to the Commission that caused the staff to 

1 We treat the four claimants as joint whistleblowers because they presented themselves as acting jointly when they 

provided their information to the Commission in their Form TCR. See Rule 21F-2(a)(1); 17 C.F.R. § 240.21F2(a)(1). Proceeding in this way has not impacted the net total award percentage to the Joint Claimants. Unless they, 

within ten (10) calendar days of the issuance of this Order, make a joint request, in writing, for a different allocation 

of the award among the four of them, the Office of the Whistleblower is directed to pay each of them individually 

25% of their joint award. 
 

 

 

open the investigation, and that the Commission’s charges in the successful enforcement action 

were based, in part, on Joint Claimants’ information.

2

 Joint 

Redacted Redacted Redacted Redacted Redacted Redacted Redacted Redacted Redacted Redacted Redacted Redacted

Claimants participated in multiple interviews with Commission staff and provided documents 

that provided evidence of false and misleading statements made to investors. 

Redacted Redacted Redacted ***

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Joint Claimants shall receive a joint award of 

percent ( ***%) of the monetary sanctions collected or to be collected in the Covered 

Action. 

By the Commission. 

J. Matthew DeLesDernier

Deputy Secretary 

2 See Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) Section 21F(b)(1), 15 U.S.C. § 78u-6(b)(1); Exchange Act 

Rule 21F-3(a), 17 C.F.R. § 240.21F-3(a). 

3 

4 

5 

Redacted Redacted Redacted
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 91893 / May 13, 2021

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension, 

pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, of trading of the 

securities of Kingold Jewelry, Inc. (“KGJI” or “the Company”) (CIK 0001089531) of 

Wuhan, Hubei Province, People’s Republic of China at 9:30 a.m. EST on May 14, 2021, 

and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EST on May 27, 2021.

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of KGJI because of 

questions regarding the adequacy and accuracy of information in the marketplace about 

the Company and the market for its securities. KGJI has failed to restate its financial 

statements for the 2016, 2017, and 2018 fiscal years after its auditor resigned and 

withdrew its reports on those financial statements and has not filed any periodic reports 

since it filed a Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2019. In mid-February 

2021, in the absence of any publicly available information from the media or current 

information from the Company for about six months, the share price and trading volume 

of KGJI increased significantly.

The Commission cautions brokers, dealers, shareholders, and prospective purchasers that 

they should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently 

available information and any information subsequently issued by the Company. 

Further, brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Rule 15c2-11

under the Exchange Act, at the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may 

be entered unless and until they have strictly complied with all of the provisions of the 

rule. If any broker or dealer has any questions as to whether or not it has complied with 

the rule, it should not enter any quotation but immediately contact the staff in the 

Division of Trading and Markets, Office of Interpretation and Guidance, at (202) 551-

5777. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is required by Rule 15c2-11, it 

should refrain from entering quotations relating to Kingold’s securities until such time as 

it has familiarized himself with the rule and is certain that all of its provisions have been 

met. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation which is in violation of the rule, the 

Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement action.

If any broker, dealer or other person has any information that may relate to this matter,

they should immediately contact Michael D. Paley, Assistant Regional Director, New 

York Regional Office, at (212) 336-0145.