alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 396 

Designating October 2019 as ‘‘National Health Literacy Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 31, 2019 

Mr. MURPHY (for himself, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, and Mr. 

SCOTT of South Carolina) submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating October 2019 as ‘‘National Health Literacy 

Month’’. 

Whereas health literacy is the degree to which individuals can 

obtain and understand basic health information in order 

to make informed health decisions; 

Whereas, according to the latest national assessment of 

health literacy, a majority of adults have intermediate 

health literacy, while more than 75,000,000 adults have 

basic or below basic health literacy; 

Whereas language and cultural differences can affect health 

literacy and thereby lower effective health communication 

between providers and patients; 

Whereas, according to the Agency for Healthcare Research 

and Quality, low health literacy is associated with higher 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 396 IS 

rates of emergency care use, increased hospitalizations, 

and, among seniors, higher mortality; 

Whereas the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 

also found that low health literacy can be associated with 

a lack of medication adherence; 

Whereas experts estimate that the annual cost of low health 

literacy to the United States economy is between 

$106,000,000,000 and $238,000,000,000; 

Whereas mental health literacy may lead to better outcomes 

for individuals with mental disorders, particularly individuals with suicidal ideation, either by facilitating early 

help-seeking by those individuals or helping others identify early signs of mental disorders and seek help on behalf of those individuals; 

Whereas health literacy can assist in preventing disease and 

illness, increasing life expectancy, improving patient care 

and outcomes, and reducing health care costs; 

Whereas, in 2010, the Department of Health and Human 

Services issued a National Action Plan to Improve 

Health Literacy that establishes 7 goals; and 

Whereas advocacy organizations have recognized the month 

of October as ‘‘National Health Literacy Month’’ to increase awareness about the importance of making health 

information easy to understand: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates October 2019 as ‘‘National 

3 Health Literacy Month’’; 

4 (2) encourages individuals to assess and im5 prove their health knowledge and literacy; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 396 IS 

1 (3) recommends that health care providers de2 liver health services in a clear and comprehensive 

3 manner; and 

4 (4) encourages all interested parties to promote 

5 the importance of health literacy. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### James POTEETE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CAPITAL ENGINEERING, INCORPORATED, and Calumet National Bank, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-1299.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted May 1, 2002.

Decided May 9, 2002.

Before FLAUM, Chief Judge, POSNER, and ROVNER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

When we remanded a previous appeal by Mr. Poteete because the district court had erroneously awarded the defendants attorneys’ fees on the basis of Fed.R.Civ.P. 68, we remarked that Poteete’s lawsuit was frivolous and that “the defendants may well be entitled to an award of fees anyway.” *Poteete v. Capital Engineering, Inc.,*185 F.3d 804, 808 (7th Cir.1999). And indeed the district court did award fees on remand, on the basis of the frivolous nature of Poteete’s suit and of his incessant follow-up filings, also frivolous. The award precipitated the current appeal, which is pro se and completely frivolous-*501we cannot discern an intelligible argument and are given no basis for thinking that the award of fees was an abuse of discretion or otherwise unwarranted. The judgment of the district court is therefore

Affirmed.
### §470h–4. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 89–665, title I, §112, as added Pub. L. 102–575, title XL, §4014, Oct. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 4761; amended Pub. L. 106–208, §5(a)(9), May 26, 2000, 114 Stat. 319, related to professional standards. See section 306131 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
The Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD)/Joint Staff (JS) Privacy Office received one 

comment on a new Privacy Act System of Records Notice (SORN) (docket DOD-2014-OS0160) in which the commenter conveyed concerns related to academic students attending a 

University Hospital/Research/Academic center and whether the student’s or employee’s medical 

background records could be comingled or shared with human resources.

The comment does not pertain to this SORN. The published SORN applies solely to students 

attending Defense Acquisition University courses (not a university hospital/research/academic 

centers) and does not collect or use any medical records (which would also be covered by 

HIPAA) or health information.
EXHIBIT 32.1


The following certification  accompanies North Bay Bancorp's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q and is not filed as provided in SEC Release Nos. 33-8212, 34-47551 and
IC 25967, dated March 21, 2003.


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the  accompanying  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of North Bay
Bancorp  for the  quarter  ended  September  30,  2003,  I,  Terry L.  Robinson,
President  and Chief  Executive  Officer of North Bay  Bancorp,  hereby  certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1) such  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of North Bay  Bancorp  for the  quarter
ended September 30, 2003,  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of North Bay
Bancorp for the quarter  ended  September  30,  2003,  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of North
Bay Bancorp.


Dated:  November 10,  2003


                                /s/ Terry L. Robinson
                                ----------------------------------
                                TERRY L. ROBINSON
                                President and Chief Executive Officer

                                       25
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 71831 / March 28, 2014

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-14641

____________________________________

 :

In the Matter of :

 :

CHARLES L. RIZZO and : EXTENSION ORDER

GINA M. HORNBOGEN :

:

Respondent. :

____________________________________:

The Division of Enforcement (“Division”) has requested a third extension of time, 

until May 30, 2014, for entry of an order approving or disapproving the proposed Plan of 

Distribution that was noticed for public comment on September 30, 2013. 

In its request, the Division states that since the issuance of the Commission’s July 20, 

2012 Order Making Findings and Imposing Remedial Sanctions Pursuant to Section 203(f) of 

the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Section 15(b)(6) of the Securities Exchange Act of 

1934 (“Order”),

1 Respondent Charles L. Rizzo paid disgorgement, prejudgment interest and 

civil penalties to the Commission in accordance with the Order. Respondent Gina M. 

Hornbogen has made disgorgement payments as set forth in the Order. The Order created a 

Fair Fund pursuant to Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended.

On September 30, 2013, pursuant to Rule 1103 of the Commission’s Rules on Fair 

Fund and Disgorgement Plans,2 the Commission published a Notice of Proposed Plan of 

Distribution and Opportunity for Comment (“Notice”) for the distribution of monies placed 

 1 Exchange Act Rel. No. 67479 (July 20, 2012).

2 17 C.F.R. 201.1103.
into the Fair Fund. 3 The Notice provided all interested parties thirty (30) days from the date 

of the Notice to submit a comment on the proposed Plan of Distribution. The Commission 

received comments on the proposed Plan of Distribution. 

On December 3, 2013, the Commission granted the Division’s request to extend the 

time to issue an order approving or disapproving a proposed plan of distribution to January 30, 

20144 to allow for further evaluation, analysis and consultation with other offices to properly 

address the comments. On January 30, 2014, the Commission granted the Division’s second 

request to extend the time to March 31, 2014.5 The Division indicates that additional time is 

needed to present its recommendation to the Commission with respect to the alleged harm 

presented by these comments. Consequently, the Division requests that the Commission 

extend the time to issue an order approving or disapproving a proposed plan of distribution to

May 30, 2014.

Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 1104 of the Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and 

Disgorgement Plans,

6 for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that the time for entering 

an order approving or disapproving the proposed Plan of Distribution is extended to May 30, 

2014.

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Jill M. Peterson

Assistant Secretary

 3 Exchange Act Rel. No. 70573 (Sep. 30, 2013).

4 Exchange Act Rel. No. 70965 (Dec. 3, 2013).

5 Exchange Act Rel. No. 71448 (Jan. 30, 2014).

6 17 C.F.R. 201.1104.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15935-15936]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6629]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Lake Tahoe Basin Federal Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Lake Tahoe Federal Advisory Committee (LTFAC) will hold 
meetings on March 31, 2011, April 6, 2011, and April 19, 2011 at the 
Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit, 35 College Drive, South Lake Tahoe, 
CA 96150. This Committee, established by the Secretary of Agriculture 
on December 15, 1998 (64 FR 2876), is chartered to provide advice to 
the Secretary on implementing the terms of the Federal Interagency 
Partnership on the Lake Tahoe Region and other matters raised by the 
Secretary.

DATES: The meetings will be held March 31, 2011 beginning at 10 a.m. 
and ending at 4 p.m. and April 6, 2011, beginning at 10 a.m. and ending 
at 4 p.m. and April 19, 2011 beginning at 10 a.m. and ending at 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at the Lake Tahoe Basin Management 
Unit, 35 College Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150.
    For Further Information or to Request an Accommodation (one week 
prior to meeting date) Contact: Arla Hains, Lake Tahoe Basin Management 
Unit, Forest Service, 35 College Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150, 
(530) 543-2773.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Items to be covered on the agenda on March 
31, 2011: (1) Tahoe Working Group presentation on the Southern Nevada 
Public Management Act (SNPLMA) Round 12 capital project nominations and 
science themes, and (2) public comment. Items to be covered on the 
agenda on April 6 include: (1) Follow-up presentations on the SNPLMA 
Round 12 capital project nominations and science themes, and (2) public 
comments. Items to be covered on the agenda on April 9 include (1) 
LTFAC SNPLMA Round 12 preliminary recommendations for capital projects 
and science themes, and (2) public comment.

[[Page 15936]]

    All Lake Tahoe Basin Federal Advisory Committee meetings are open 
to the public. Interested citizens are encouraged to attend at the 
above address. Issues may be brought to the attention of the Committee 
during the open public comment period at the meeting or by filing 
written statements with the secretary for the Committee before or after 
the meeting. Please refer any written comments to the Lake Tahoe Basin 
Management Unit at the contact address stated above.
    This Federal Register notice will be published less than 15 
calendar days based on these exceptional circumstances: (1) The 2011 
LTFAC has only recently received a preliminary confirmation (February 
1, 2011); and (2) there will be timely meeting notification through the 
LTBMU Web site at http://www.fs.fed.us/r5/ltbmu/local/ltfac/.

    Dated: March 16, 2011.
Michael LeFevre,
Acting Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2011-6629 Filed 3-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
Editorial Note on Part 635
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 635 appear at 67 FR 75924, Dec. 10, 2002.

§ 635.108 Health and safety. Contracts for projects shall include provisions designed: ( a ) To insure full compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws governing safety, health and sanitation; and
( b ) To require that the contractor shall provide all safeguards, safety devices, and protective equipment and shall take any other actions reasonably necessary to protect the life and health of persons working at the site of the project and the safety of the public and to protect property in connection with the performance of the work covered by the contract.
DflDOn 

Hoofing 

C 0 ffi p 8 n y A Name You Can Trust 

5039 West Avenue • P. 0. Box 13380 • San Antonio, Texas 78213 

(210)341-3100 • (800) 688-7663 • Fox (210)341-2959 

www.beldon.com 

October 22, 2015 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20950 

RE: Docket No. FAA-2015-3250 

Dear Madam or Sir, 

Per the FAA, U.S. Dept. ofTransportation's recent request, please see the following 

information pertaining to the two Drones as per the petition filed on behalf of Beldon Roofing 

Company: 

Phantom 3 Standard I Manufactured by DJI: 

Quadcopter Drone (roto-craft) for aerial photography and filmmaking which 

includes a camera. The Flight Controller on this drone provides for an automatic 

return-to-home if remote signal is lost (a/k/a Smart RTH). Its weight is 1216 

grams and has a maximum flight time of approximately 25 minutes. 

Phantom 3 Advance I Manufactured by DJI: 

Quadcopter Drone (roto-craft) for aerial photography and filmmaking which 

includes a camera. The Flight Controller on this model also provides for an 

automatic return-to-home if remote signal is lost but with three types of 

functionality: Smart RTH, Low Battery RTH and Failsafe RTH. It weighs 1280 

grams and has a maximum flight time of approximately 23 minutes. 

Should you require additional information, please let me know. I thank you in this regard 

and remain, 

Sincerely, 

BELDON ROOFING COMPANY 

c~~~ JanR. Kemp 

Sr. Paralegal to Curtis P. Cote, General Counsel 

Licensed in the states of Florida [[{057757, Nevada #68211, and other states. Please see www.be1don.com/states for a complete list of licenses. 
copy: 

via U.S.P.S. regular mail and email transmission to: 333exemptions@faa.gov 

Ms. Brenda Robeson, Program Analyst 

U.S. Dept. ofTransportion- FAA 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591
Exhibit 10.38

AMENDMENT 2001-1  TO  HILTON HOTELS  401(k) SAVINGS PLAN

The Pension and Thrift Committee (the "Committee") for Hilton Hotels Corporation hereby adopts the following amendment to the Hilton Hotels 401(k) Savings Plan
(the "Plan"):

1.    Section 6.4
of the Plan is hereby amended by the addition of the following paragraph (f) at the end thereof effective January 1, 2001:



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Committee has caused this amendment to be executed this 14th day of March, 2002.

| |  | Hilton Hotels Corporation
Pension and Thrift Committee
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------
| |  | By:                                                   

---

QuickLinks
### §470t. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 89–665, title II, §212, as added Pub. L. 94–422, title II, §201(9), Sept. 28, 1976, 90 Stat. 1323; amended Pub. L. 95–625, title VI, §614, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3521; Pub. L. 96–205, title VI, §608(a)(3), Mar. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 92; Pub. L. 96–244, §2, May 19, 1980, 94 Stat. 346; Pub. L. 96–515, title III, §302(b), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 3000; Pub. L. 98–483, Oct. 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 2258; Pub. L. 101–70, Aug. 3, 1989, 103 Stat. 180; Pub. L. 102–575, title XL, §4017, Oct. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 4763; Pub. L. 103–437, §6(d)(29), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4584; Pub. L. 104–333, div. I, title V, §509(a), Nov. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 4157; Pub. L. 106–208, §3, May 26, 2000, 114 Stat. 318; Pub. L. 109–453, §1(f), Dec. 22, 2006, 120 Stat. 3368, related to submission of budget and authorization of appropriations. First sentence of subsec. (a) and subsec. (b) were repealed and restated in section 304109 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs. Last sentence of subsec. (a) authorized appropriations to carry out this part.
#### Edward Harold SAUNDERS, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-6226.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 25, 2002.

Decided May 8, 2002.

Edward Harold Saunders, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed in part and affirmed in part by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Edward Harold Saunders, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994), and his motion for reconsideration filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). We dismiss in part and affirm in part.

In civil actions where the United States is a party, parties are accorded sixty days after entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, *see*Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” *Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr.,*434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting *United States v. Robinson,*361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)).

The district court’s order denying § 2241 relief was entered on the docket on November 8, 2001, and Saunders filed his notice of appeal on January 25, 2002. Because Saunders failed to file a timely notice of appeal or obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s November 8 order denying § 2241 relief. We therefore dismiss this portion of the appeal.

With regard to the denial of Rule 60(b) relief, we have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no abuse of discretion. We therefore affirm the denial of Rule 60(b) relief on the reasoning of *102the district court. *Saunders v. United States,*No. CA-01-737-5-H (E.D.N.C. filed Jan. 10, 2002 & entered Jan. 11, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART.*
#### Fannie Moseley, appellee, v. J. M. Fillebrown et al, appellants.

Filed May 8, 1902.

No. 11,312.

No Merit in Appeal From the Confirmation of Sale.

Appeal from the district court for Fillmore county. Heard below before Stubbs, J.

*Affirmed.*

*Charles H. Sloan,*for appellants;

*John Bar shy, contra.*

Sedgwick, J.

The Citizens’ Bank of Geneva appealed from the confirmation of a sale of real estate in Fillmore county. There is no merit in the appeal.

The objection that the officer who made the sale was not-qualified to do so is based solely upon an affidavit which says that he was not sheriff on-the 24th day of January, 1900, the day of the sale. It is admitted in the brief fthed that he was sheriff at the time the order of sale was issued and no reasons are given in the affidavit, nor is there any statement of facts from which it might be found that he had ceased to be sheriff. The court found that the sale was duly made by the sheriff of Fillmore county and this objection is wholly without merit.

It appears that no revenue stamp was attached to the certificate of the appraisement; but it has been several times held by this court that, under the act of congress of 1898, omission of revenue stamps from certificates in *581legal proceedings in the state courts did not invalidate those proceedings.

The decree of the district court is

Affirmed.
Case 1:21-cv-11938-MJJ Document 45 Filed 01/02/24 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:21-cv-11938-MJJ Document 45 Filed 01/02/24 Page 2 of 8
Case 1:21-cv-11938-MJJ Document 45 Filed 01/02/24 Page 3 of 8
Case 1:21-cv-11938-MJJ Document 45 Filed 01/02/24 Page 4 of 8
Case 1:21-cv-11938-MJJ Document 45 Filed 01/02/24 Page 5 of 8
Case 1:21-cv-11938-MJJ Document 45 Filed 01/02/24 Page 6 of 8
Case 1:21-cv-11938-MJJ Document 45 Filed 01/02/24 Page 7 of 8
Case 1:21-cv-11938-MJJ Document 45 Filed 01/02/24 Page 8 of 8
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Last Will and Testament of Anna M. Hollenbeck, Deceased. Helen A. H. St. John, Individually and as Executrix, etc., of Anna M. Hollenbeck, Deceased, and Denison Hollenbeck, Appellants; Giles Hollenbeck and Others, Respondents.

Decree of Surrogate’s Court reversed upon questions of fact, with costs to appellant to abide event, payable out of the estate, and atrial of the following questions of fact directed to be had by a jury at a Trial Term of the Supreme Court to be held in and for the county of Monroe on the second Monday of September, 1913, viz.: “1. Was the instrument offered for probate, dated the 2d day of August, 1895, duly executed and published by the testatrix as her last will and testament ? 2. Did the testatrix duly execute and publish a will on or about Decembers, 1910, or at any time subsequent to the execution of the instrument proposed for probate by which she revoked the will dated August 2, 1895 ? ” The particular questions of fact upon which the reversal is made are the findings contained in the decision to the effect that the testatrix executed a will on or about December 5, *9041910, in the manner and form set forth in the decision. (See *Matter of Burtis,*107 App. Div. 51; *Matter of Richardson,*137 id. 104.) All concurred.