alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 179/2018

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 179 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6125 May 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 179

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6125 May 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions |
| | RECOMMENDATIONS |
| | Council |
| 2018/C 179/01 | Council Recommendation of 14 May 2018 on the economic policy of the euro area | 1 |

Contents

page

I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions

RECOMMENDATIONS

Council

2018/C 179/01

Council Recommendation of 14 May 2018 on the economic policy of the euro area

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 179/02 | Euro exchange rates | 6 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 179/02

Euro exchange rates

6

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 179/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8808 — T-Mobile Austria/UPC Austria)Text with EEA relevance.
   (1
  ) | 7 |
| 2018/C 179/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8903 — BHAP/Gestamp China/Manufacturing JV/Sales JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedureText with EEA relevance.
   (1
  ) | 9 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2018/C 179/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8808 — T-Mobile Austria/UPC Austria)Text with EEA relevance.
   (1
  )

1

7

2018/C 179/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8903 — BHAP/Gestamp China/Manufacturing JV/Sales JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedureText with EEA relevance.
   (1
  )

1

9

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
### §460k–1. Acquisition of lands for recreational development; funds

The Secretary is authorized to acquire areas of land, or interests therein, which are suitable for—

(1) incidental fish and wildlife-oriented recreational development,

(2) the protection of natural resources,

(3) the conservation of endangered species or threatened species listed by the Secretary pursuant to section 1533 of this title, or

(4) carrying out two or more of the purposes set forth in paragraphs (1) through (3) of this section, and are adjacent to, or within, the said conservation areas, except that the acquisition of any land or interest therein pursuant to this section shall be accomplished only with such funds as may be appropriated therefor by the Congress or donated for such purposes, but such property shall not be acquired with funds obtained from the sale of Federal migratory bird hunting stamps.

Lands acquired pursuant to this section shall become a part of the particular conservation area to which they are adjacent.

(Pub. L. 87–714, §2, Sept. 28, 1962, 76 Stat. 653; Pub. L. 92–534, Oct. 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 1063; Pub. L. 93–205, §13(d), Dec. 28, 1973, 87 Stat. 902.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1973—Pub. L. 93–205 inserted references to the acquisition of interest in land the conservation of endangered species or threatened species listed by the Secretary pursuant to section 1533 of this title.

1972—Pub. L. 92–534 substituted provisions authorizing the Secretary to acquire lands suitable for fish and wildlife oriented recreational development, or for the protection of natural resources and adjacent to conservation areas, for provisions authorizing the Secretary to acquire limited areas of land for recreational development adjacent to conservation areas in existence or approved by the Migratory Bird Conservation Commission as of September 28, 1962.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1973 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 93–205 effective Dec. 28, 1973, see section 16 of Pub. L. 93–205, set out as a note under section 1531 of this title.
§ 32.54 Director determination. ( a ) Upon the Director's approving or denying a claim, the PSOB Office shall serve notice of the same simultaneously upon the claimant (and upon any other claimant who may have filed a claim with respect to the same public safety officer), and upon any Hearing Officer who made a determination with respect to the claim. Such notice shall— ( 1 ) Specify the factual findings and legal conclusions that support it; and
( 2 ) In the event of a denial, provide information as to judicial appeals.
( b ) Upon a claimant's failure (without reasonable justification or excuse) to pursue in timely fashion the determination of his claim pursuant to his filed Director appeal, the Director may, at his discretion, deem the same to be abandoned, as though never filed. Not less than thirty-three days prior thereto, the PSOB Office shall serve the claimant with notice of the Director's intention to exercise such discretion.
( c ) With respect to any claim before him, the Director, as appropriate, may (among other things)— ( 1 ) Remand the same to the PSOB Office, or to a Hearing Officer;
( 2 ) Vacate any related determination under this part; or
( 3 ) Refer any related matters to a Hearing Officer (as a special master), to recommend factual findings and dispositions in connection therewith.
[73 FR 76536, Dec. 17, 2008, as amended at 83 FR 22387, May 15, 2018]
Departamento de Salud y Servicios Humanos

Centros para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades

CS257796-B
Back to: http://dnr.metrokc.gov/wlr/indwaste/dentists.htm

Mercury levels in King County biosolids:

Over the last few years, 95 percent of King County dental offices have taken steps to reduce 

the amounts of mercury and silver discharged to the sewer system. Most offices have 

installed amalgam separators and followed the required Best Management Practices (BMPs) 

for amalgam wastes and spent fixer. 

Partially as a result of these activities, mercury levels in King County biosolids have dropped 

by 50 percent. 

The following graph illustrates the reduction in mercury in the county’s biosolids: 

 

The condition of our biosolids is the best indicator of the quality of King County wastewater 

discharges. King County’s biosolids (go to: http://dnr.metrokc.gov/wtd/biosolids/index.htm) 

contain only very small amounts of metals and organic chemicals, thanks to the cooperation 

of county businesses and industry. After processing and treatment, the county’s biosolids are 

beneficially recycled used as soil conditioners on farms, forests, lawns and gardens. Efforts 

to remove mercury from wastewater are ways to keep biosolids clean and safe for recycling. 

To help sustain this success, the King County Industrial Waste Program is monitoring how 

dental offices are practicing the required BMPs by continuing to inspect a portion of these 

offices each year. And we will continue to track mercury levels in the county’s biosolids. 

The county is also participating in a national study of mercury concentrations in the treatment 

plant influent, effluent, and biosolids, under the auspices of the National Association of 

Clean Water Agencies: http://www.nacwa.org/ .
Case 17-32589-KLP Doc Filed 01/08/21 Entered 01/08/21 15:50:11 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 6
Case 17-32589-KLP Doc Filed 01/08/21 Entered 01/08/21 15:50:11 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 6
Case 17-32589-KLP Doc Filed 01/08/21 Entered 01/08/21 15:50:11 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 6
Case 17-32589-KLP Doc Filed 01/08/21 Entered 01/08/21 15:50:11 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 6
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

RICHMOND DIVISION 

In Re: Case No. 17-32589-KLP

Haywood L. Dabney 

 aka Haywood Lee Dabney 

Darshae L. Dabney 

 aka Darshae Latoya Dabney

Chapter 13 

Debtors. Judge Keith L. Phillips

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I certify that on January 8, 2021, a copy of the foregoing Notice of Mortgage Payment Change 

was filed electronically. Notice of this filing will be sent to the following party/parties through 

the Court’s ECF System. Party/Parties may access this filing through the Court’s system: 

Richard C. Pecoraro, Debtors’ Counsel 

rich@richlawrva.com 

Suzanne E. Wade, Chapter 13 Trustee 

ecfsummary@ch13ricva.com 

Office of the United States Trustee 

(registeredaddress)@usdoj.gov 

I further certify that on January 8, 2021, a copy of the foregoing Notice of Mortgage Payment 

Change was mailed by first-class U.S. Mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed to the 

following: 

Haywood L. Dabney, Debtor 

1612 Cedar Grove Terrance 

Henrico, VA 23228 

 

Case 17-32589-KLP Doc Filed 01/08/21 Entered 01/08/21 15:50:11 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 6
Darshae L. Dabney, Debtor 

1612 Cedar Grove Terrance 

Henrico, VA 23228 

Dated: January 8, 2021 /s/ D. Anthony Sottile

 D. Anthony Sottile 

Authorized Agent for Creditor 

Sottile & Barile, LLC 

394 Wards Corner Road, Suite 180 

Loveland, OH 45140 

Phone: 513.444.4100 

Email: bankruptcy@sottileandbarile.com

Case 17-32589-KLP Doc Filed 01/08/21 Entered 01/08/21 15:50:11 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 6
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4716 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a safe harbor 

for high deductible health plans without a deductible for certain inhalers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 17, 2019 

Mr. COX of California (for himself and Ms. SEWELL of Alabama) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

a safe harbor for high deductible health plans without 

a deductible for certain inhalers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Inhaler Coverage and 

5 Access Now Act’’ or as the ‘‘I CAN Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SAFE HARBOR FOR HIGH DEDUCTIBLE HEALTH 

7 PLANS WITHOUT DEDUCTIBLE FOR CERTAIN 

8 INHALERS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 223(c)(2)(C) of the Inter10 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4716 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘for preventive care’’ and insert2 ing ‘‘for one or more of the following: 

3 ‘‘(i) Preventive care’’, and 

4 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

5 clause: 

6 ‘‘(ii) Inhalers for treatment of any 

7 chronic lung disease (and any medicine or 

8 drug which is delivered through such in9 haler for treatment of such disease).’’. 

10 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The heading for 

11 section 223(c)(2)(C) of such Code is amended by striking 

12 ‘‘PREVENTIVE CARE DEDUCTIBLE’’ and inserting ‘‘CER13 TAIN DEDUCTIBLES’’. 

14 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this subsection shall apply to months beginning after the 

16 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
### §482e. Lincoln National Forest; mining rights

On and after June 13, 1939, mining locations made under the United States mining laws upon lands within the watershed of the headwaters of the Bonito River in the Lincoln National Forest within the State of New Mexico, specifically described as those certain pieces or parcels of land situate, lying, and being in the county of Lincoln, State of New Mexico, described as follows:

The east half east half section 12, east half east half section 13, east half northeast quarter section 24, township 10 south, range 10 east, New Mexico principal meridian; southeast quarter section 25, southwest quarter section 26, south half section 27, southeast quarter and south half southwest quarter section 28, southeast quarter section 31, and all of sections 32, 33, 34, 35, and 36, township 9 south, range 11 east, New Mexico principal meridian; all of sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 27, 28, and 29, north half section 19, north half and southwest quarter section 24, northwest quarter section 26, north half northeast quarter section 32, and north half north half section 33, township 10 south, range 11 east, New Mexico principal meridian; southwest quarter section 25, south half of fractional section 26, all of fractional section 35, and all of section 36, township 9 south, range 12 east, New Mexico principal meridian; all of section 1, all of fractional section 2, all of fractional section 11, all of section 12, all of section 13, all of fractional section 14, north half of fractional section 23, and north half section 24, township 10 south, range 12 east, New Mexico principal meridian; having an area of approximately thirty-nine and three hundred and seventy-six one-thousandths square miles, shall confer on the locator the right to occupy and use only so much of the surface of the land covered by the location as may be reasonably necessary to carry on prospecting and mining, including the taking of mineral deposits and timber required by or in the mining operations, and no permit shall be required or charge made for such use or occupancy: Provided, however, That the cutting and removal of timber, except where clearing is necessary in connection with mining operations or to provide space for buildings or structures used in connection with mining operations, shall be conducted in accordance with the rules for timber cutting on adjoining national-forest land, and no use of the surface of the claim or the resources therefrom not reasonably required for carrying on mining and prospecting shall be allowed except under the national-forest rules and regulations, nor shall the locator prevent or obstruct other occupancy of the surface or use of surface resources under authority of national-forest regulations, or permits issued thereunder, if such occupancy or use is not in conflict with mineral development.

(June 13, 1939, ch. 201, §1, 53 Stat. 817.)
§ 490.609 Data requirements. ( a ) Travel time data needed to calculate the Freight Reliability measure in § 490.607 shall come from the travel time data set, as specified in § 490.103(e).
( b ) State DOTs, in coordination with MPOs, shall define reporting segments in accordance with § 490.103(f). Reporting segments must be contiguous so that they cover the full extent of the directional mainline highways of the Interstate in the State.
( c ) When truck travel times are not available in the travel time data set (data not reported, or reported as “0” or null) as specified in § 490.611(a)(1)(ii) for a given 15 minute interval, State DOTs shall replace the missing travel time with an observed travel time that represents all traffic on the roadway during the same 15 minute interval (“all vehicles” in NPMRDS nomenclature).
( d ) If an NHS roadway is closed, the State DOT is not required to include those time periods for those segments of road in the calculations required for the Freight Reliability metric/measure.
----

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Köln (Germany), lodged on 14 July 2006 — Deutsche Telekom AG v 01051 Telecom GmbH

(Case C-306/06)

(2006/C 249/05)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Köln

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Deutsche Telekom AG

Defendant: 01051 Telecom GmbH

Question referred

Is a national rule that payment preventing the occurrence of default by a debtor or terminating existing default on his part does not depend on the time when the amount is credited to the creditor's account but on the time when the debtor gives a transfer order that is covered by sufficient funds or a sufficient credit limit and is accepted by the bank compatible with Article 3(1)(c)(ii) of Directive 2000/35/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 June 2000 on combating late payment in commercial transactions?

----

(1)  OJ L 200, p. 35.

----
#### Mark Anthony CUNNINGHAM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gregory BORIS, Police Officer; Phillip Chapin, Police Officer; Michael Wingler, Police Sergeant; Southern District of Baltimore City, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-7957.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 26, 2002.

Decided May 9, 2002.

Mark Anthony Cunningham, Appellant Pro Se. Robert D. Anbinder, Office of the *122City Solicitor, Baltimore, Maryland; Charles Grant Byrd, Jr., Brown, Alston & Byrd, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Mark Anthony Cunningham appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *Cunningham v. Boris,*No. CA-01-247 (D.Md. Oct. 19, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### In re Lacy DAVIS, III, Petitioner.

No. 01-8054.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 15, 2002.

Decided May 14, 2002.

*135Lacy Davis, III, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before WILKINS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Lacy Davis filed a petition for a writ of mandamus asking this court to overturn the district court’s dismissal of his civil tort complaint, and remand for further consideration. Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary circumstances. *Kerr v. United States Dist. Court,*426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976). Mandamus relief is only available when there are no other means by which the relief sought could be granted, *In re Beard,*811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.1987), and may not be used as a substitute for appeal. *In re Catawba Indian Tribe,*973 F.2d 1133, 1135 (4th Cir.1992). The party seeking prohibition or mandamus relief carries the heavy burden of showing that he has no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires and that his entitlement to such relief is clear and indisputable. *Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.,*449 U.S. 33, 35, 101 S.Ct. 188, 66 L.Ed.2d 193 (1980). Lacy has not made such a showing. He had an ample opportunity to pursue a direct appeal from the district court’s dismissal order, but declined to do so. He may not now employ a mandamus petition to avoid the consequences of his failure to appeal. Accordingly, we deny Lacy’s petition for mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 405 

Expressing support for the designation of October as ‘‘Brain Health 

Awareness Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 31, 2019 

Mr. GRASSLEY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of October as ‘‘Brain 

Health Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas millions of individuals in the United States suffer 

from behavioral health conditions, such as anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder, or a traumatic brain injury or acquired brain injury that disrupts 

the normal function of the brain; 

Whereas a serious behavioral health condition, such as schizophrenia, or a traumatic brain injury or acquired brain injury, such as a stroke, that disrupts the normal function 

of the brain often is linked to cognitive and behavioral 

challenges; 

Whereas millions of individuals in the United States struggle 

with challenges caused by a traumatic brain injury, 

stroke, or mental health conditions; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 405 IS 

Whereas hundreds of thousands of members and veterans of 

the Armed Forces have been diagnosed with traumatic 

brain injury and millions more have been diagnosed with 

post-traumatic stress disorder as a result of their service, 

which can lead to persistent challenges for those members 

and veterans and their families; 

Whereas approximately 1 in 5 people in the United States 

struggle with behavioral health disorders each year, but 

a majority of those people do not seek treatment for their 

condition, often due to the stigma associated with doing 

so; 

Whereas early and adequate access to care, such as imaging 

technology that can identify areas of the brain that have 

been compromised, promotes health and can greatly increase the overall quality of life of many individuals in 

the United States; 

Whereas grassroots organizations such as Brain Health Now 

of Iowa and Mental Health Connecticut, which are dedicated to ending the stigma of mental illness, have called 

for every individual in the United States to treat health 

conditions affecting the brain with the same regard and 

care as physical illnesses, such as heart disease; and 

Whereas it is important to educate the public on the incidence and prevalence of brain injury and disease and to 

support the needs of those who are injured: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the designation of October as 

3 ‘‘Brain Health Awareness Month’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 405 IS 

1 (2) encourages all individuals in the United 

2 States to use Brain Health Awareness Month as an 

3 opportunity to promote greater acceptance of and 

4 support for individuals living with diseases or inju5 ries affecting the brain. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
!""!"#!

!#!"#!""$$#%

! !!$$""&'
(


(	

	

	



)
	

	
&*+



,' 
	&"	

	
-.	/

				

	

	


 !
"#"$% $&'( "%	)*$ $! *+",-'.-'


0
	1-
1

2'
1
2
,122
3
421,-+4'
(
& !

""!"#!!#!"#!""$$#%! !!$$""&
-

"	
(150
	-
,126	-
-*+

(150
	-
,12

6	-
-2
5

-0
		
7
-


	11

(15+21,-+4	
-	&11	

#*$$*&
	
4
201
8.
/1	3
-121-
31'
(



2
0,1
21	--
2	
	1
1	

,
4-*-
2"	

-
-%+
4 9&8::9&
-0
--
3
5,
-0
-	
2'#*#";
	

*
03*:::::::::8<8&
-	0-+4
,
4
2*+

 &'( "%

	)*$ $! *+",-'.-'
--	01+-
	2
,,
7	

*15
&$	6

'0
+&=1	+5>
7
4&

8'
	
,,!(&?<::


,&'*8::

@ ?<A

:9:9

!
42
 !""!"#!!#!"#!""$$#%! !!$$""

Case 16-34467-KLP Doc 23 Filed 09/19/19 Entered 09/19/19 08:56:06 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 4
"    %"$  #*$$*&  
  1	  ,12  	
,,  B-  
    0
	  
  

2
0,
		
,

,,
70
	

)	0
01
-	
,
7&
	3
4+0		
4&



+
1
				1

2
4

*
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC

D-5& 
)04


$!"$*1	10
2@1511


$-
*
0)CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC


	)2
1	

E	E*15
&$	6

*15
&$	6

9:8

Sep 18 2019 /s/ Keith L. Phillips

Sep 19 2019

Case 16-34467-KLP Doc 23 Filed 09/19/19 Entered 09/19/19 08:56:06 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 4
'0
+&=1	+5>
7
4&

8'
	
,,!(&?<::


,&'*8::

@ ?<A

:9:9

	



-
	-


E	EC1!
5

CCCCCCCCCC

1!
5




5

>'
)	&

A:
+3!(

1::

103
-&@1511
88

	


.+4  *1  5
&  $	6  71  31		1
 2
3  1  !


5

+
	-
%!FE3
1,/

FCCE	E*15
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC

  E	E
,' 
	CCCCCCCCCCCCCC


,' 
	

# 
B<9

103
-&@1511
88<



.+4*15
&$	67131		1
2
3


,' 
	+
	-
%!FE3
1,/

FCCE	E*15
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC


0
,,9:88./1210
1


"2
5
15#-7
	-
	-+4
-E
	(-

,,0		
4
1		




0
,,9:88./

E	E*15
&$	6

1210
1


"-	15-0121	
2
5
15#-
15,122
3
41	1

	+	
1
,0
3,1
0
2
3
-61-+4!-311	
1(#-
-



3
-1210
1
	&
--11
	&
-,1
	
(+3
-

E	E*15
&$	6

9:8

Case 16-34467-KLP Doc 23 Filed 09/19/19 Entered 09/19/19 08:56:06 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 4

	


	

	


<:=

-+1-5

-

'0
10	(1,,&@1511
8


1	71,,+	,0
10
,,4(1
'E$%	4	3
1!
5

&!
42
*+



-
,' 
	&"	

9:8

Case 16-34467-KLP Doc 23 Filed 09/19/19 Entered 09/19/19 08:56:06 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 4