alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 211 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 211

 Recognizing the Aviation Cadet Museum in Eureka Springs, Arkansas, as 
             ``America's National Aviation Cadet Museum''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 15, 2019

   Mr. Boozman (for himself and Mr. Cotton) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing the Aviation Cadet Museum in Eureka Springs, Arkansas, as 
             ``America's National Aviation Cadet Museum''.

Whereas, in 1994, former Aviation Cadet and United States Air Force First 
        Lieutenant Errol Severe founded the Aviation Cadet Museum;
Whereas the flying cadet and succeeding aviation cadet programs served as the 
        primary production source of nearly 500,000 United States Air Force 
        pilots, navigators, and bombardiers from 1917 to 1961;
Whereas the bravery, courage, dedication, and heroism of United States aviators 
        from across the Air Corps and Army Air Forces were critical factors in 
        defeating the enemies of the United States during World War I and World 
        War II;
Whereas the Aviation Cadet Museum in Eureka Springs, Arkansas, exists to 
        exclusively preserve and promote an understanding of the role of 
        aviation cadets in the 20th century; and
Whereas the Aviation Cadet Museum is dedicated to celebrating the spirit of the 
        United States and recognizing the teamwork, collaboration, patriotism, 
        and courage of the individuals who trained and fought and the 
        individuals on the homefront who mobilized and supported the national 
        aviation effort: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate recognizes the Aviation Cadet Museum in 
Eureka Springs, Arkansas, as ``America's National Aviation Cadet 
Museum''.
                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal L 47/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 47 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6410 February 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 47

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6410 February 2021

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2021/118 of amending budget No 9 of the European Union for the financial year 2020 | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

*

Definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2021/118 of amending budget No 9 of the European Union for the financial year 2020

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed July 22, 2015

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D14- 686

Lower Tribunal No. 11-23587

________________



### Erick Pacheco,

Appellant,

vs.



### The State of Florida

, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Bronwyn C.

Miller

, Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Shannon Hemmendinger, Assistant

Public Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Nikole Hiciano, Assistant Attorney

General

, for appellee.

Before SALTER, LOGUE and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAMAppellant Erick Pacheco appeals his conviction for lewd and lascivious

molestation (Count 1 of the State’s information) and for lewd and lascivious

conduct (Count 3 of the State’s information). We affirm Pacheco’s conviction for

lewd and lascivious molestation and, upon the State’s proper concession of error,

reverse Pacheco’s conviction for lewd and lascivious conduct.

We remand the case to the trial court to vacate Pacheco’s conviction for

lewd and lascivious conduct (Count 3), to recalculate Pacheco’s scoresheet, and to

resentence Pacheco accordingly.

Affirmed in part; reversed and remanded in part.

2
#### § 657.13 Certification requirement.

Each State shall certify to the Federal Highway Administrator, before January 1 of each year, that it is enforcing all State laws respecting maximum vehicle size and weight permitted on what, prior to October 1, 1991, were the Federal-aid Primary, Secondary, and Urban Systems, including the Interstate System, in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 127. The States must also certify that they are enforcing and complying with the ISTEA freeze on the use of LCV's and other multi-unit vehicles. The certification shall be supported by information on activities and results achieved during the preceding 12-month period ending on September 30 of each year.

[59 FR 30418, June 13, 1994]
**MPD** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 01 88 STATE OF MONTANA ,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. BRANDON BAILEY ,

Respondent and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including Octo ber 1 4 , 2020 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 8 2020

09/08/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0188
**Exhibit 8**

 

List of Principal Subsidiaries

Of

Grupo Industrial Maseca, S.A. de C.V.

 
| **Subsidiary**                                              |   | **Jurisdiction of Incorporation** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|
|                                                        |   |                              |
| Molinos Azteca, S.A. de C.V.                                |   | Mexico                            |
|                                                        |   |                              |
| Harinera de Veracruz, S.A. de C.V.                          |   | Mexico                            |
|                                                        |   |                              |
| Molinos Azteca de Jalisco, S.A. de C.V.                     |   | Mexico                            |
|                                                        |   |                              |
| Molinos Azteca de Chalco, S.A. de C.V.                      |   | Mexico                            |
|                                                        |   |                              |
| Harinera de Maíz de Jalisco, S.A. de C.V.              |   | Mexico                            |
|                                                        |   |                              |
| Harinera de Yucatán, S.A. de C.V.                      |   | Mexico                            |
|                                                        |   |                              |
| Harinera de Maíz de Mexicali, S.A. de C.V.             |   | Mexico                            |
|                                                        |   |                              |
| Molinos Azteca de Chiapas, S.A. de.C.V.                     |   | Mexico                            |
|                                                        |   |                              |
| Molinos Azteca de Veracruz, S.A. de C.V.                    |   | Mexico                            |
|                                                        |   |                              |
| Compañía Nacional Almacenadora, S.A. de C.V.      |   | Mexico                            |
|                                                        |   |                              |
| Servicios Administrativos y Financieros Gimsa, S.A. de C.V. |   | Mexico                            |
|                                                        |   |                              |
| Industria Tortilladora Azteca, S.A. de C.V.                 |   | Mexico                            |
|                                                        |   |                              |
| Arrendadora de Maquinaria de Chihuahua, S.A. de C.V.        |   | Mexico                            |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-01-2000
<CASH>                                       2,185,757
<SECURITIES>                                12,033,866
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,987,606
<ALLOWANCES>                                   377,000
<INVENTORY>                                  8,929,957
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            37,576,762
<PP&E>                                      40,332,119
<DEPRECIATION>                              16,644,782
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              69,894,520
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,463,018
<BONDS>                                        226,003
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       520,887
<OTHER-SE>                                  56,150,339
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                69,894,520
<SALES>                                     97,075,223
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            97,075,223
<CGS>                                       72,273,047
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               72,273,047
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,192
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             14,080,049
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,512,350
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          8,567,699
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,567,699
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .81


</TABLE>
§ 90.66 Evaluation. ( a ) Recipients of Arrest Program funds must agree to cooperate with federally-sponsored research and evaluation studies of their projects at the direction of the Office on Violence Against Women.
( b ) Grant funds may not be used for purposes of conducting research or evaluations. Recipients of Arrest Program funds are, however, strongly encouraged to develop a local evaluation strategy to assess the impact and effectiveness of their projects. Applicants should consider entering into partnerships with research organizations that are submitting simultaneous grant applications to the National Institute of Justice or other research funding sources for this purpose.
### §460m–3. Establishment; notice in Federal Register; alteration of boundaries; acreage limitation

When the Secretary determines that lands and waters, or interests therein, have been acquired by the United States in sufficient quantity to provide an administrable unit, he shall declare establishment of the Ozark National Scenic Riverways by publication of notice in the Federal Register. The Secretary may thereafter alter such boundaries from time to time, except that the total acreage in the Ozark National Scenic Riverways shall not exceed sixty-five thousand acres, exclusive of land donated by the State of Missouri or its political subdivisions and of federally owned land transferred pursuant to section 460m–1 of this title.

(Pub. L. 88–492, §4, Aug. 27, 1964, 78 Stat. 609.)
### Geology and mineral deposits of the Turtle Lake quadrangle, Washington

By: George E. BecraftPaul L. Weis

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1131

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf) 
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Geology of the southern part of the Turtle Lake Quadrangle, northeastern Washington(1959)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### §470k. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 89–665, title II, §203, Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 918, related to cooperation between Council and instrumentalities of executive branch of Federal Government. See section 304103 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
Exhibit 10.5
                                                                    ------------
                             JOINT FILING AGREEMENT

         In accordance  with Rule 13d-1(k) under the Securities  Exchange Act of
1934, as amended,  the undersigned hereby agree to the joint filing on behalf of
each of them of a statement on Schedule 13D  (including  amendments  thereto) or
any  subsequent  filings on Schedule 13G  (including  amendments  thereto)  with
respect to the Common Stock, $.001 par value ("Common Stock"),  of Source Media,
Inc.,  a  Delaware  corporation,  and that this  Joint  Filing  Agreement  (this
"Agreement") be included as an Exhibit to such joint filing.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hereby execute this Agreement as of
this __th day of January, 2000.

                                            Insight Interactive, LLC



                                            BY:   Insight communications
                                                  company, inc., its sole member


                                            By:   /s/Kim D. Kelly
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Kim D. Kelly
                                                  Executive Vice President,
                                                  Chief Operating and Financial
                                                  Officer and Secretary


                                            INSIGHT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, INC.


                                            By:  /s/Kim D. Kelly
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Kim D. Kelly
                                                 Executive Vice President, Chief
                                                 Operating and Financial Officer
                                                 and Secretary
§ 650.211 Guidelines. ( a ) The FHWA adopts the AASHTO Highway Drainage Guidelines, Volume III, “Erosion and Sediment Control in Highway Construction,” 1992,[1] as guidelines to be followed on all construction projects funded under title 23, United States Code. These guidelines are not intended to preempt any requirements made by or under State law if such requirements are more stringent.
( b ) Each State highway agency should apply the guidelines referenced in paragraph (a) of this section or apply its own guidelines, if these guidelines are more stringent, to develop standards and practices for the control of erosion and sediment on Federal-aid construction projects. These specific standards and practices may reference available resources, such as the procedures presented in the AASHTO “Model Drainage Manual,” 1991.[2]
( c ) Consistent with the requirements of section 6217(g) of the Coastal Zone Act Reauthorization Amendments of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-508, 104 Stat. 1388-299), highway construction projects funded under title 23, United States Code, and located in the coastal zone management areas of States with coastal zone management programs approved by the United States Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, should utilize “Guidance Specifying Management Measures for Sources of Nonpoint Source Pollution in Coastal Waters,” 84-B-92-002, U.S. EPA, January 1993.[3] State highway agencies should refer to this Environmental Protection Agency guidance document for the design of projects within coastal zone management areas.
Footnotes -
650.211
[1] This document is available for inspection from the FHWA headquarters and field offices as prescribed by 49 CFR part 7, appendix D. It may be purchased from the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials offices at Suite 225, 444 North Capitol Street, NW., Washington, DC 20001.
[2] This document is available for inspection from the FHWA headquarters and field offices as prescribed by 49 CFR part 7, appendix D. It may be purchased from the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials offices at Suite 225, 444 North Capitol Street, NW., Washington, DC 20001.
[3] This document is available for inspection and copying as prescribed by 49 CFR part 7, appendix D.
EXHIBIT 10.16

                            UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

$70,000                                                     Miami Beach, Florida
                                                               November 30, 1999

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned promises to pay to the order of YUPI
INTERNET INC. and/or assigns, the principal sum of Forty Thousand dollars
($70,000) together with interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum,
until maturity, said payment to be in one lump sum of principal and interest for
Forty three thousand two hundred dollars ($75,600), lawful money of the United
States of America is due on November 30, 2000.

This note shall be repayable in whole or in part at any time without penalty.
This note may not be assumed without the consent of YUPI INTERNET INC.

Each maker and endorser severally waives demand, protest and notice of maturity,
non-payment or protest and all requirements necessary to hold each of them
liable as makers and endorsers.

Each maker and endorser further agrees, jointly and severally, to pay all costs
of collection, including a reasonable attorney's fee in case the principal of
this note and the interest thereon is not paid at the maturity date, or in case
it becomes necessary to protect the security thereof, whether suit be brought or
not.

/S/  RODOLFO VILA
-------------------------
By Rodolfo Vila
(No. 81-CC-1514

#### David Tillotson, Administrator of the Estate of Edward Tillotson, Deceased, Claimant, *v.*The State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed July 17, 1981.*

Levine, Wittenberg, Eisner, Newman & Silverman, for Claimant.

Tyrone C. Fahner, Attorney General (Sandra L. Andina, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.

*354Holderman, J.

This matter comes before the Court upon motion of Respondent to dismiss, Claimant’s response to motion to dismiss, and motion for general continuance by Claimant.

Claimant’s motion for general continuance does not set forth any reason for his request for said continuance, and therefore, said request is denied.

Respondent’s motion to dismiss sets forth that the accident upon which this claim is based was the result of decedent being struck by a car while walking on the roadway along 162nd Street within the village of South Holland, Illinois, and that decedent was compelled to walk on the roadway because of the impassability of the adjacent sidewalk due to accumulation of snow and ice. Said motion further sets forth that the Illinois Department of Transportation is under no duty to build or maintain sidewalks or overpasses located within municipalities; that such would be the duty of the municipalities themselves; and that the village of South Holland is a municipality and therefore the State is not responsible for said accident.

It is hereby ordered that Respondent’s motion to dismiss be, and the same is, granted, and this cause is dismissed.