alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 750.108 General provisions. No Class 3 or 4 signs may be permitted to be erected or maintained pursuant to § 750.107, and no Class 2 sign may be permitted to be erected or maintained, in any manner inconsistent with the following: ( a ) No sign may be permitted which attempts or appears to attempt to direct the movement of traffic or which interferes with, imitates or resembles any official traffic sign, signal or device.
( b ) No sign may be permitted which prevents the driver of a vehicle from having a clear and unobstructed view of official signs and approaching or merging traffic.
( c ) No sign may be permitted which contains, includes, or is illuminated by any flashing, intermittent or moving light or lights.
( d ) No lighting may be permitted to be used in any way in connection with any sign unless it is so effectively shielded as to prevent beams or rays of light from being directed at any portion of the main-traveled way of the Interstate System, or is of such low intensity or brilliance as not to cause glare or to impair the vision of the driver of any motor vehicle, or to otherwise interfere with any driver's operation of a motor vehicle.
( e ) No sign may be permitted which moves or has any animated or moving parts.
( f ) No sign may be permitted to be erected or maintained upon trees or painted or drawn upon rocks or other natural features.
( g ) No sign may be permitted to exceed 20 feet in length, width or height, or 150 square feet in area, including border and trim but excluding supports, except Class 2 signs not more than 50 feet from, and advertising activities being conducted upon, the real property where the sign is located.
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

Washington, D.C. 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 93078 / September 20, 2021

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension of trading 

in the securities of the following issuer, commencing at 9:30 a.m. EDT on September 21, 2021 

and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EDT on October 4, 2021:

 Real Goods Solar, Inc. (RGSEQ)

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of the foregoing company due 

to a lack of current and accurate information about the company because it has not filed certain 

periodic reports with the Commission. This order was entered pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act).

The Commission cautions brokers, dealers, shareholders and prospective purchasers that they 

should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available 

information and any information subsequently issued by this company.

Brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11, at 

the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered relating to the securities 

of the subject company unless and until the broker or dealer has strictly complied with all of the 

provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is required by the rule, it 

should refrain from entering quotations relating to the securities of this company that has been 

subject to a trading suspension until such time as it has familiarized itself with the rule and is 

certain that all of its provisions have been met. Any broker or dealer with questions regarding

the rule should contact the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, DC 

at (202) 551-5777. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation which is in violation of the rule,

the Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement action. 

If any broker, dealer or other person has any information which may relate to this matter, they 

should immediately communicate it to the Delinquent Filings Branch of the Division of 

Enforcement at (202) 551-5466, or by e-mail at DelinquentFilings@sec.gov.
San Francisco International Airport 

March 4,2010 

P.O. Box 8097 

San Francisco, CA 94128 

Tel 650.821.5000 

Fax 650.821.5005 

www.nysfcixom 

«i«ro«T 

COMMIfflOM 

CITY AND COUMTY 

OF SAN FRANCISCO 

CAVIN NiWSOM 

AMUM 

lAMYMAZZOU 

PMUOtHT 

UNOAS.OIAYTON 

WCEMESIMNT 

CARVl ITO 

EICANOO lOHNS 

mCHAKO J. OUOCtNHIME 

JOHN L. MAIITIN 

AWWurofHCTa* 

The Honorable Raymond H. LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Docket DOT-OST-2010-0034 

Dear Mr. Secretary: 

On behalf of the San Francisco International Airport, I write in support of the 

Department of Transportation's expeditious consideration of the pending American 

Airlines/Japan Airlines application for antitrust immunity and proposed joint 

business agreement, pursuant to the same standards applied by DOT to other alliance 

applications by U.S. airlines. 

Worldwide alliances, such as oneworld, have proven beneficial for the 

aviation industry and for passengers. Airlines secure marketing and operational 

efficiencies, airports obtain more efficient use of facilities, and passengers stand to 

benefit through lower fares and more seamless global airlines connections. Increased 

alliance competition will in turn enhance the benefits of the Department's Open 

Skies policy - first by solidifying U.S. - Japan Open Skies, then by serving as a 

foundation for iurther liberalization across Asia. 

IX)T has in the past supported global airline alliances that enhance consumer 

welfare and competition. In the interest of our region's traveling public and in the 

interest of a competitive global marketplace for air travel, we urge the Department to 

act as promptly as possible on the American Airlines/Japan Airlines request. 

Very truly yours, 

Joni^ L. Martin 

Airport Director 

P.O. Box 8097 

San Francisco, CA. 94128 

John.Martin(g),flvsfo.com
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

In Re: )

 )

FRANTZY POINVIL ) Case No. 16-12002-BFK

 ) Chapter 13

Debtor )

___________________________________________________________________

MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY

DISMISSAL OF CHAPTER 13 CASE UNDER §1307(b)

COMES NOW Debtor Frantzy Poinvil through his counsel Tommy Andrews Jr. and Tommy Andrews Jr. 

PC and represents as follows:

1. This Chapter 13 case has not been converted to Chapter 13 from another chapter of Title 11.

2. This case was filed on June 08, 2016.

3. Under 11 U.S.C. §1307(b), a Debtor is entitled to have his Chapter 13 case dismissed at any time. 

Counsel, by this Motion on behalf of Debtor, requests that this case, bearing the case # 17-10680-

BFK, be dismissed. 

WHEREFORE, Debtor moves this Honorable Court to enter an order dismissing this case without 

prejudice and for such other and further relief as this Honorable Court deems just and proper under the law.

Respectfully submitted,

TOMMY ANDREWS Jr., counsel for 

FRANTZY POINVIL

/s/ Tommy Andrews Jr.

Tommy Andrews, Jr., Esq. #28544

Tommy Andrews, Jr., P.C.

122 North Alfred Street

Alexandria, Virginia 22314

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on 25th day of August, 2017, a copy of the foregoing Debtor’s Motion of 

Voluntary Dismissal of Chapter 13 Case Under §1307(b) was served by first class mail, postage prepaid, by hand 

delivered, and/or by ECF system to the Chapter 13 Trustee, the US Trustee and all creditors and interested parties.

/s/ Tommy Andrews Jr.

Tommy Andrews, Jr.

Case 16-12002-BFK Doc 48 Filed 08/25/17 Entered 08/25/17 16:27:27 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6839

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CARLTON ELSWORTH HENRY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. N. Carlton Tilley,

Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-95-75)

Submitted: September 27, 2005 Decided: October 3, 2005

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlton Elsworth Henry, Appellant Pro Se. Clifton Thomas Barrett,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*Henry filed a “motion for review of sentence imposed in

violation of law,” which the district court construed as a motion

to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Carlton Elsworth Henry, a federal prisoner, seeks to

appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of

the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000)

motion as successive.* An appeal may not be taken from the final

order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims

addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find both that the district court’s assessment of his

constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any

dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also

debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336

(2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,

252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed

the record and conclude that Henry has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
- 3 -

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Case 16-71348-SCS Doc 15 Filed 04/26/16 Entered 04/27/16 14:13:07 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 4
Case 16-71348-SCS Doc 15 Filed 04/26/16 Entered 04/27/16 14:13:07 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 4
Case 16-71348-SCS Doc 15 Filed 04/26/16 Entered 04/27/16 14:13:07 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 4
Case 16-71348-SCS Doc 15 Filed 04/26/16 Entered 04/27/16 14:13:07 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 4
### §2464. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–227, title II, §202(b), Oct. 2, 1996, 110 Stat. 3044

Section, Pub. L. 101–594, §5, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 2977, declared the sense of Congress that Secretary of State should negotiate international agreements relating to protection of Antarctic environment and that any such international agreement be consistent with purpose and provisions of this chapter.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 72999 / September 4, 2014

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-11578

In the Matter of

 CIHC, INC., CONSECO SERVICES, 

LLC, and CONSECO EQUITY SALES, 

INC.,

Respondents.

ORDER DIRECTING DISBURSEMENT 

OF FAIR FUND

On January 19, 2010, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”)

published an “Amended Notice of Proposed Plan of Distribution and Opportunity for Comment” 

(“Notice”) pursuant to Rule 1103 of the Commission’s Rules of Fair Fund and Disgorgement 

Plans, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1103.

1

The Notice advised all interested parties that they could obtain a 

copy of the Distribution Plan from the Commission’s public website, http://www.sec.gov, or by 

submitting a written request to George S. Canellos, Regional Director, United States Securities

and Exchange Commission, 3 World Financial Center, Room 400, New York, NY 10281. The 

Notice also advised that all persons desiring to comment on the Distribution Plan had to submit 

their comments, in writing, within 30 days of the date of the Notice. No Comments were 

received in response to the Notice. On February 26, 2010, the Commission issued an Order 

Approving Plan, Appointing a Fund Administrator, and Waiving Bond.2

The Distribution Plan provides for the distribution of the disgorgement, prejudgment 

interest and civil penalty paid by the Respondents, plus any accumulated interest earned, less a 

reserve for taxes and any amounts determined to be payable upon appeal, to investors according 

to the methodology set forth in the Distribution Plan. The Independent Distribution Consultant 

has submitted to the Commission staff a validated list of payees and payment amounts. 

Commission staff has reviewed the validated list and requests that, pursuant to Rule 1101(b)(6) 

of the Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans, the Commission authorize the 

transfer of $4,263,506.27 from the Fair Fund to U.S. Bank, NA for distribution in accordance 

with the Distribution Plan.

 

1

See Exchange Act Rel. No. 61209A (Jan. 19, 2010).

2

See Exchange Act Rel. No. 61601 (Feb. 26, 2010).
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Commission staff shall transfer $4,263,506.27

from the Fair Fund to U.S. Bank, NA, and the Fund Administrator shall distribute such monies to 

investors as provided for in the Distribution Plan.

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Lynn M. Powalski

Deputy Secretary
### §4608. Authorization of appropriations

#### (a) Department of the Interior

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary such sums as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this chapter, not to exceed the amount expended for such purposes for fiscal year 1990.

#### (b) Other Federal agencies

There are authorized to be appropriated to other Federal departments and agencies such sums as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of any other Take Pride in America programs established by such departments or agencies.

(Pub. L. 101–628, title XI, §1109, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4503.)
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 18.1




May 21, 1999

Steel City Products, Inc.
3513 Concord Pike
Suite 3527
Wilmington, DE

Dear Sirs/Madams:

We have audited the financial statements of Steel City Products, Inc. as of
February 28, 1999 and 1998, and for each of the three years in the period ended
February 28, 1999, included in your Annual Report on Form 10-K to the Securities
and Exchange Commission and have issued our report thereon dated May 21, 1999.
Note 1 to such financial statements contains a description of your adoption
during the year ended February 28, 1999 of the first-in, first-out method (FIFO)
of inventory costing. Prior to the year ended February 28, 1999, Steel City
Products, Inc. utilized the last-in, first-out method (LIFO) of inventory
costing. In our judgment, such change is to an alternative accounting principle
that is preferable under the circumstances.

Yours truly,

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
### §410zz. Findings and purpose

The Congress finds that—

(1) the Saguaro National Monument was established by Presidential Proclamation in 1933;

(2) the Tucson Mountain unit was established by Presidential Proclamation in 1961;

(3) in recognition of the need to provide increased protection for the monument, the boundaries of Tucson Mountain unit were expanded in 1976, and the boundaries of Rincon unit were expanded in 1991;

(4) the Tucson Mountain unit continues to face threats to the integrity of its natural resources, scenic beauty, and habitat protection for which the unit was established;

(5) these threats impede opportunities for public enjoyment, education, and safety within the monument, as well as opportunities for solitude within the wilderness areas of the monument designated by Congress in 1976;

(6) the residential and commercial growth of the greater Tucson, Arizona metropolitan area is causing increasing threats to the monument's resources; and

(7) the Tucson Mountain unit should be enlarged by the addition of adjacent lands of National Park caliber and Saguaro National Monument should be afforded full recognition and statutory protection as a National Park.

(Pub. L. 103–364, §2, Oct. 14, 1994, 108 Stat. 3467.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title of 2020 Amendment

Pub. L. 116–260, div. FF, title II, §201(a), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 3088, provided that: "This section [amending section 410zz–2 of this title] may be cited as the 'Saguaro National Park Boundary Expansion Act'."

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 103–364, §1, Oct. 14, 1994, 108 Stat. 3467, provided that: "This Act [enacting this subchapter and amending provisions listed in a table of National Monuments Established Under Presidential Proclamation set out under section 431 of this title] may be cited as the 'Saguaro National Park Establishment Act of 1994'."
EXHIBIT 99.1

                     Form of Section 906 Certification

               CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of NMXS.com, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the
"Report"), I, Richard Govatski, President of the Company, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of the Company.


/s/ Richard Govatski
Richard Govatski, President

Date:  May 20, 2003
#### Union Trust Company, appellee, v. Oscar N. Davis, appellant.

Filed April 2, 1902.

No. 11,581.

1. Appraisement: Evidence. Evidence examined, and *held*to sustain the trial court in refusing to set aside the appraisement as being too low.

2. Foreclosure: Sale: Deputy Shebiff. Where a decree of foreclosure directs a sale of real estate by a sheriff, such sale is valid if made by the deputy sheriff.

Appeal from the district court for Custer county. Heard below before Sullivan, J.

*Affirmed.*

*J. B. Demi,*for appellant.

*Talbot & Allen*and *Alpha Morgan, contra.*

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from an order of confirmation. Two questions are discussed in appellant’s brief. The land was appraised at $2,800, and it is contended that this valuation was too low. One witness on behalf of the landowner testified that the property was fairly worth $3,200, but this testimony was not sufficient to overthrow the appraisement. There is no merit in the first objection; and the second, which is that the deputy sheriff had no authority to make the appraisement and sale, is equally groundless.

The order is

Affirmed.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1208

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1208 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and at 68 FR 10352, Mar. 5, 2003.

#### § 1208.7 [Reserved]
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 350 

Designating September 2019 as ‘‘National Childhood Cancer Awareness 

Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2019 

Mr. MANCHIN (for himself, Mr. HAWLEY, Mr. REED, and Mrs. CAPITO) 

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 2019 as ‘‘National Childhood Cancer 

Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas each year more than 15,000 children under the age 

of 19 in the United States, and more than 300,000 children globally, are diagnosed with cancer; 

Whereas every year more than 1,700 children under the age 

of 19 in the United States lose their lives to cancer; 

Whereas childhood cancer is the leading cause of death from 

disease and the second overall leading cause of death for 

children in the United States; 

Whereas the 5-year survival rate for children with cancer has 

increased from 58 percent in the mid-1970s to 84 percent in 2019, representing significant improvement from 

previous decades; and 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 350 ATS 

Whereas cancer occurs regularly and randomly and spares no 

racial or ethnic group, socioeconomic class, or geographic 

region: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates September 2019, as ‘‘National 

3 Childhood Cancer Awareness Month’’; 

4 (2) requests that the Federal Government, 

5 States, localities, and nonprofit organizations ob6 serve the month with appropriate programs and ac7 tivities, with the goal of increasing public knowledge 

8 of the risks of cancer; and 

9 (3) recognizes the human toll of cancer and 

10 pledges to make the prevention and cure of cancer 

11 a public health priority. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
§ 2.23 Delegation to hearing examiners. ( a ) There is hereby delegated to hearing examiners the authority necessary to conduct hearings and make recommendations relative to the grant or denial of parole or reparole, revocation or reinstatement of parole or mandatory release, and conditions of parole. Any hearing may be conducted by a single examiner or by a panel of examiners. Notwithstanding the provisions of §§ 2.48 through 2.51, §§ 2.101 through 2.104 and §§ 2.214 through 2.217, there is also delegated to hearing examiners the authority necessary to make a probable cause finding, to determine the location of a revocation hearing, and to determine the witnesses who will attend the hearing, including the authority to issue subpoenas for witnesses and evidence.
( b ) The concurrence of two examiners shall be required to obtain a panel recommendation to the Regional Commissioner. A panel recommendation is required in each case decided by a Regional Commissioner after the holding of a hearing.
( c ) An examiner panel recommendation exists of two concurring examiner votes. In the event of divergent votes, the case shall be referred to another hearing examiner for another vote. If concurring votes do not result from such a referral, the case shall be referred to any available hearing examiner until a panel recommendation is obtained.
[84 FR 43690, Aug. 22, 2019]
### Adsorption of cesium on clay minerals

By: J.S. WahlbergMarvin J. Fishman

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1140A

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### §580l. Permits for grazing livestock on national forests

The Secretary of Agriculture in regulating grazing on the national forests and other lands administered by him in connection therewith is authorized, upon such terms and conditions as he may deem proper, to issue permits for the grazing of livestock for periods not exceeding ten years and renewals thereof: Provided, That nothing herein shall be construed as limiting or restricting any right, title, or interest of the United States in any land or resources.

(Apr. 24, 1950, ch. 97, §19, 64 Stat. 88.)