alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                               EXHIBIT 10.16.1


                        ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO BUILDING LEASE

     This Addendum is to a certain Building Lease dated March 8, 1999 between
The City of Fort Scott, Kansas ("Landlord") and Intek, Inc. ("Tenant") and is
upon the request of the Landlord for the addition of certain language that was
not included in the lease through inadvertence.

     The additional language is as follows:

Civil Rights Provision:
-----------------------

Discrimination in Employment.  The Tenant shall not discriminate against any
qualified employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion,
sex, national origin, age, or physical or mental disability.  The City of Fort
Scott should take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and
that employees are treated without regard to their race, color, religion, sex,
national origin, age, or disability.  Such action shall included but may not be
limited to the following:  Employment, upgrading, demotion or transfers;
recruitment or recruitment advertising; lay-off or termination; rates of pay or
other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including an
apprenticeship.  The Tenant agrees to post notices setting forth the provisions
of the non-discrimination clause in conspicuous places so as to be available to
employees.

The parties agree that the foregoing addendum shall be construed as a basic
provision of the Building Lease previously executed by the parties on the 8/th/
day of March, 1999.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Landlord and Tenant, acting herein by duly authorized
individuals, have caused this instrument to be executed in _________ originals,
on the _____ day of ______________, 1999.


LANDLORD: City of Fort Scott             TENANT:  Intek, Inc.
          ------------------                      -----------

_____________________________       /s/ Patrick O'Neal, Managing Director
                                    -------------------------------------
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6295

AZANIAH BLANKUMSEE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. RICKY FOXWELL, Warden of ECI; ROBERT TROXELL, CDM; DALE CHILDERS, Correctional Officer; ANTOINETTE PERRY, CPT at ECI; MEDICAL DEPARTMENT AT ECI , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Paul W. Grimm , District Judge. ( 8:18

- cv
- 00106

- PWG )

Submitted : July 23, 2020 Decided: July 28, 2020

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Azaniah Blankumsee, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Conrad Meister, Gina Marie Smith, MEYERS, RODBELL & ROSENBAUM, PA, Riverdale Park, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: In his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018) action, Azaniah Blankumsee appeals the district
court’s order s (1) granting summary judgment to Defendan ts Ricky Foxwell, Robert Troxell, Dale Childers, and Antoinette Perry; and (2) dismissing the claims against the Medical Department at ECI, but granting Blankumsee 28 days to file a more definite statement providing the names of the individuals or parties that allegedly harmed him. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Blankumsee v. Foxwell , No. 8:18

- cv
- 00106

- PWG (D.
Md. Jan. 10, 2019; filed Feb. 7, 2020 & entered F eb. 10, 2020)

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

* The district court entered a final judgment dismissing Blankumsee’s complaint on April 7, 2020. Although Blankumsee ’s appeal was interlocutory at the time he filed his notice of appeal , we now have jurisdiction to consider the appeal under the doctrine of cumulative finality. See Houck v. Substitute Tr. Servs., Inc. , 791 F.3d 473, 479 (4th Cir. 2015)

.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-QSB

 

(Mark One)

|   | x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|--------|---|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

For the quarter ended March 31, 2006

 

|   | o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|--------|---|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

For the transition period from _____________ to _____________

 

*COMMISSION FILE #333-30176*

 

NEW MEXICO SOFTWARE, INC.

 

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in charter)

 

NEVADA

(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION)

 

91-1287406

 

(IRS EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER)

 

5021 Indian School Road, Suite 100

Albuquerque, New Mexico 87110

 

(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES) (ZIP CODE)

 

(505) 255-1999

(REGISTRANT’S TELEPHONE NO., INCLUDING AREA CODE)

 

(FORMER NAME, FORMER ADDRESS AND FORMER FISCAL YEAR,

IF CHANGED SINCE LAST REPORT)

 

INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT (1) HAS FILED ALL REPORTS REQUIRED TO BE FILED BY SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 DURING THE PRECEDING 12 MONTHS (OR FOR SUCH SHORTER PERIOD THAT THE REGISTRANT WAS REQUIRED TO FILE SUCH REPORTS), AND (2) HAS BEEN SUBJECT TO SUCH FILING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PAST 90 DAYS. 

 

YES x NO o

 

INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT IS A SHELL COMPANY (AS DEFINED IN RULE 12b-2 OF THE EXCHANGE ACT).

 

YES o NO x

 

NUMBER OF SHARES OF THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON STOCK OUTSTANDING AT MAY 11, 2006 IS:   59,577,250. 

 

 

----
#### § 42.603 Confidentiality.

When an agency receives information obtained by EEOC, the agency shall observe the confidentiality requirements of sections 706(b) and 709(e) of title VII as would EEOC, except in cases where the agency receives the same information from a source independent of EEOC or has referred a joint complaint to EEOC under this regulation. In such cases, the agency may use independent source information or information obtained by EEOC under the agency's investigative authority in a subsequent title VI, title IX or revenue sharing act enforcement proceeding. Agency questions concerning confidentiality shall be directed to the Associate Legal Counsel for Legal Services, Office of Legal Counsel of EEOC.
# Giri';;,4

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20-0187
IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: KENNETH MICHAEL SMITH,

Petitioner and Appellant. and MELISSA SUE GRAHAM,f/k/a MELISSA SUE SMITH,

Respondent and Appellee. 7-t-. 13 

# r SEP 

## 2 2 2020 Bow,,n L,rt.,..enwood Clerk of Supreme Court St:-
- Ate of Montana ORDER

Kenneth Smith appealsa March 2020orderrequiring him to participate in mediation of his parenting dispute with Melissa Graham. Smith filed a mediation request on January 28,2020,and moved to rescind the request a month later. The Guardian ad Litem (GAL)opposed the rescission, and the District Court denied the request, ordering the parties to participate in mediation in good faith. Upon review ofSmith's current appeal,we determine that the appeal is not from a final judgment and is improperly before this Court. Smith cannot file appeals in the case until there is a final judgment that has determined all rights and claims in this underlying proceeding or an order otherwise appealable under the provisions ofthe Montana Rules of Appellate Procedure. M.R.App.P. 4(1), 6(1), 6(3). Smith does not appeal a final judgment,pursuant to M.R.App.P. 6(1),as the proceeding remains pending before the District Court. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Smith's Motion For: An Order to Further Evaluate the Respondent's Mental Health Status and Motion For: Entry ofDefault and to Set Aside Pending Request to Further Evaluate Respondent are DENIED as moot. 09/22/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0187The Clerk ofthe Supreme Court is directed to close this case as ofthe date ofthis

Order and to issue remittitur. The Clerk also is directed to provide a copy ofthis Order to the appointed mediator, to the Honorable Michael F. McMahon, First Judicial District Court; to Angie Sparks, Clerk of District Court, Lewis and Clark County, under Cause No.BDR-2016-389; to Michael D. McLean, GAL for minor child; and to Melissa Sue Graham and Kenneth Michael Smith pTisonally. DATED thisZe--tt-

day ofSeptember,2020.

2
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

In Re: 

Jesse Lee Reeder Case # 16-11013-KHK 

REPORT OF DEPOSIT OF UNCLAIMED FUNDS 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3011 and 11 U.S.C. 347, the trustee 

herein submits a check, or checks, payable to the “Clerk, United States Bankruptcy Court” 

representing unclaimed funds to be deposited by the Clerk of the Court into the Treasury 

of the United States. Said funds are subject to withdrawal as provided by 28 U.S.C. 2042 

and shall not escheat under any state law. Unclaimed funds represent the dividend(s) due 

and payable to the entity identified as the original payee on the face of the enclosed 

check(s). 

PAYEE 

JESSE LEE REEDER 

100 I Street, S.e., Apt. 1218 

Washington, DC 20003 

AMOUNT 

$1,395.00 

Dated: February 12, 2020 __/s/Thomas P. Gorman ___________ 

Thomas P. Gorman 

300 North Washington Street, Ste. 400 

Alexandria, VA 22314 

(703) 836-2226 

VSB#26421 

Case 16-11013-KHK Doc 75 Filed 02/12/20 Entered 02/12/20 10:42:27 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
#### Albert Fuchs, Plaintiff in Error, v. I. E. Block, Defendant in Error.

Gen. No. 15,179.

Landlord and *tenant—when party signing lease not liable for rent.*One who joins in the execution of a lease, which lease is a complete contract between the lessor and lessee mentioned therein is not obligated thereby for the rent aceuring under such lease if such person is in nowise referred to in the body thereof.

Assumpsit. Error to Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Frederick L. Fake, Jr., Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the March term, 1909.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed June 30, 1910.

B. M. Shaffner, for plaintiff in error.

Blum & Blum, for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff brought an action in the Municipal Court against John Terrell and I. E. Block to recover $225 rent on a lease. The lease begins as follows: “This agreement made, etc., *483between Albert Fuchs, party of the first part, and John Terrell, party of the second part,” etc., and is signed:

“Albert Fuchs [Seal]

John Terrell [Seal]

I. E. Block . [Seal]”

Terrell was not served with summons. Block entered an appearance. Plaintiff put in evidence the lease, which contains a covenant by the party of the second part to pay certain rent. It was admitted that the signature of Block to the instrument was genuine. The court held that because Block’s name did not appear in the body of the instrument he was not bound by the covenants of the lease, and gave judgment for the defendant.

The instrument is a complete contract between Fuchs and Terrell, and Block’s name is not mentioned in the body of the instrument.

In Lancaster v. Roberts, 144 Ill. 213, it was held that “when a third person merely annexes his name to a contract which in the body of it does not mention him, and which is in itself a complete contract between other parties who sign it and are mentioned in it, such third person does not thereby become a party to the efficient and operative parts of the contract.” We regard the decision in that case as controlling the decision in this case. ' See, also, Doyle v. Dunne et al., 144 Ill. App. 14.

The judgment of the Municipal Court will be affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 27, 2020

b1019 

# Order

Clerk October 27, 2020

160782(21)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 160782

COA: 350561

Wayne CC: 09

- 004221

- FC

JOSHUA LOPP,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for r econsideration of this Court’s July 28, 2020

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that reconsideration

of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).
#### § 450.304 Definitions.

Except as otherwise provided in subpart A of this part, terms defined in 23 U.S.C. 101(a) and 49 U.S.C. 5302 are used in this subpart as so defined.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cedar Grove Marketing, Inc.,
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  B.
Stephen Bailey,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge  and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Gilman + Ciocia, Inc.
(the "Company") for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003, as amended by this Form
10-K/A, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Dennis Conroy, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

By: /s/ Dennis Conroy
    --------------------------
Name: Dennis Conroy
      Chief Accounting Officer

Date: June 15, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16407-16408]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6774]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice Announcing Preliminary Permit Drawing

------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund XLIV....  Project No. 13737-000.
FFP Missouri 11, LLC.............  Project No. 13759-000.
Solia 5 Hydroelectric, LLC.......  Project No. 13766-000.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission has received three preliminary permit applications 
deemed filed on May 18, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.,\1\ for proposed projects to 
be located at the Army Corps of Engineers' Maxwell Lock and Dam on the 
Monongahela River, in Washington County, Pennsylvania. The applications 
were filed by Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund XLIV for Project No. 13737, FFP 
Missouri 11, LLC, for Project No. 13759, and Solia 5 Hydroelectric, 
LLC, for Project No. 13766.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Under the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, any 
document received after regular business hours is considered filed 
at 8:30 a.m. on the next regular business day. 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(2) 
(2010).
    \2\ Maxwell Hydro, LLC, also filed a permit application to study 
the same site for Project No. 13787, which is deemed filed on May 
19, 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On March 24, 2011, at 10 a.m. (eastern time), the Secretary of the 
Commission, or her designee, will conduct a random drawing to determine 
the filing priority of the applicants identified in this notice. The 
Commission will select among competing permit applications as provided 
in section 4.37 of its regulations.\3\ The priority established by this 
drawing will be used to determine which applicant, among those with 
identical filing times, will be considered to have the first-filed 
application.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 18 CFR 4.37 (2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The drawing is open to the public and will be held in room 2C, the

[[Page 16408]]

Commission Meeting Room, located at 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 
20426. A subsequent notice will be issued by the Secretary announcing 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
the results of the drawing.

    Dated: March 15, 2011.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-6774 Filed 3-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

May 17, 2021

In the Matter of

USA Zhimingde International Group Corp.,

File No. 500-1

ORDER OF SUSPENSION OF

TRADING

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of USA Zhimingde 

International Group Corp. (“ZMDC1”) (CIK No. 1363343), an active Nevada corporation located 

in New York, NY with a class of securities registered with the Commission pursuant to 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") Section 12(g) because it is delinquent in its 

periodic filings with the Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 

10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2019. On December 17, 2020, the Commission’s Division 

of Corporation Finance (“Corporation Finance”) sent a delinquency letter to ZMDC requesting 

compliance with its periodic filing requirements, but ZMDC did not receive the delinquency 

letter due to its failure to maintain a valid address on file with the Commission as required by 

Commission rules (Rule 301 of Regulation S-T, 17 C.F.R. Section 232.301 and Section 5.4 of 

EDGAR Filer Manual). As of April 1, 2021, the common stock of ZMDC was quoted on OTC 

Link operated by OTC Markets Group Inc. (formerly “Pink Sheets”) (“OTC Link”), had six

market makers, and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c2-

11(f)(3). 

 

1 The short form of each issuer’s name is also its stock symbol.
2

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors 

require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company. Therefore, it is 

ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the 

securities of the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on May 

18, 2021, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on June 1, 2021.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary
EXHIBIT 21

Subsidiaries of Company

                                 Percentage Owned         State of
Subsidiaries                          by Parent         Incorporation

Easy Systems, Inc.                       100               Washington

EdVISION Corporation                     100               California

Harland Benefits Management Corporation   90               Delaware

Harland Business Products, Inc.          100               Delaware

Harland dataPRINT, Inc.                  100               Georgia

Harland Financial Solutions, Inc.        100               Oregon

Harland International Company            100               Georgia

Interlinq Software Corporation           100               Washington

MECA Systems LLC                         100               Delaware

Scantron Corporation                     100               Delaware

The Check Store, Inc.                    100               Georgia

Ultradata Corporation                    100               Delaware

This list excludes subsidiaries which, considered in the aggregate as a single
subsidiary, would not constitute a "significant subsidiary".
### §450bb–5. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums, not to exceed $300,000, as may be necessary for the purchase of lands, interests therein, and improvements thereon pursuant to sections 450bb–3 to 450bb–5 of this title.

(Pub. L. 86–655, §3, July 14, 1960, 74 Stat. 521.)
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

Washington, D.C. 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 93064 / September 20, 2021

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension of trading 

in the securities of the following issuer, commencing at 9:30 a.m. EDT on September 21, 2021 

and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EDT on October 4, 2021:

 Stealth Technologies, Inc. (STTH)

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of the foregoing company due 

to a lack of current and accurate information about the company because it has not filed certain 

periodic reports with the Commission. This order was entered pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act).

The Commission cautions brokers, dealers, shareholders and prospective purchasers that they 

should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available 

information and any information subsequently issued by this company.

Brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11, at 

the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered relating to the securities 

of the subject company unless and until the broker or dealer has strictly complied with all of the 

provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is required by the rule, it 

should refrain from entering quotations relating to the securities of this company that has been 

subject to a trading suspension until such time as it has familiarized itself with the rule and is 

certain that all of its provisions have been met. Any broker or dealer with questions regarding

the rule should contact the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, DC 

at (202) 551-5777. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation which is in violation of the rule,

the Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement action. 

If any broker, dealer or other person has any information which may relate to this matter, they 

should immediately communicate it to the Delinquent Filings Branch of the Division of 

Enforcement at (202) 551-5466, or by e-mail at DelinquentFilings@sec.gov.