alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Cite as State v. Roe, 2023-Ohio-3746.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

BUTLER COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO,

Appellee,

 - vs -

JUSTIN SCOTT ROE,

Appellant.

:

:

:

:

:

:

CASE NO. CA2023-06-068

D E C I S I O N

 10/16/2023

APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

Case No. CR2022-04-0503

Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, and John C. Heinkel, Assistant 

Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Christopher Bazeley, for appellant.

Per Curiam.

{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by 

appellant, Justin Scott Roe, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of 

proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon 

the brief filed by appellant's counsel.

{¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of 
Butler CA2023-06-068

- 2 -

the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court 

prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; 

(2) lists one potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744, 87 

S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine 

whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of 

appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for 

appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both 

the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.

{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having 

been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to 

appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant 

requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason 

that it is wholly frivolous.

PIPER, P.J., M. POWELL and BYRNE, JJ., concur.
[Cite as State v. Roe, 2023-Ohio-3746.]
<TABLE> <S> <C>





<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-17-1999
<CASH>                                           6,080
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,790
<ALLOWANCES>                                       905
<INVENTORY>                                     48,173
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,499
<PP&E>                                          98,269
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,451
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 157,538
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,982
<BONDS>                                         60,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            49
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,840
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   157,538
<SALES>                                        250,944
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               250,944
<CGS>                                          191,792
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  191,792
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                58,699
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,754
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,301)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       709
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,010)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,010)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.82)









</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Stone  Field  Management
Company,  on Form 10- QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the
undersigned, B. Stephen Bailey, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §5206. National Aeronautics and Space Administration

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration shall utilize existing programs in technology transfer, aeronautics and space technology, and space commercialization to promote the commercial applications of high-temperature superconductors, including applications relating to thin film technology, communications technology, sensors, space power, and propulsion.

(Pub. L. 100–697, §7, Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4615.)
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 201 O~NM-062-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?

YES () explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES () explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to mclude specific

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Joseph O’Connor, Relator, v. Rhinelander Waldo, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, Respondent.

Determination annulled and relator restored to his position, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements, on the ground that giving to the relator the presumption of innocence, the evidence on which the dismissal was based (the charges involving the commission of a crime) was insufficient to warrant a dismissal. *(People ex rel. McAuley*v. *Baker,*139 App. Div. 148, 150.) Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas and Stapleton, JJ., concurred; Hirschberg, J., not voting.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Economic burden of majorfoodborne illnesses acquired in the United States**
 
SuDoc Number:A 93.73/2:140

Item Number:0042-X (online)
CGP systemNumber:000951474
 
Report
 
Source: https://permanent.access.gpo.gov/websites/www.ers.usda.gov/publications/eib-economic-information-bulletin/eib140.aspx.htm
 
March 12, 2020
HEI Exhibit 32.1

Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc.

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer Furnished
Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted by

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc. (HEI) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Constance H. Lau, Chief Executive Officer of HEI, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The consolidated information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition as of December 31, 2006 and results of operations for
the year ended December 31, 2006 of HEI and its subsidiaries.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Constance H. Lau                 
|Constance H. Lau                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date: February 28, 2007              

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hawaiian Electric
Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §459f–9. Public utility facilities; purchase of facilities without value to utility; amount of payment

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to purchase from a public utility any facilities of that utility which are no longer of value to it as a result of the establishment of the Assateague Island National Seashore and shall pay for such facilities an amount equal to the cost of constructing such facilities less depreciation.

(Pub. L. 89–195, §10, Sept. 21, 1965, 79 Stat. 827.)
## Janice S. Lee, Assessment Manager



# Preliminary **Materials for**  **the IRIS Assessment of**  **tert -**  **Butyl Alcohol**  **( tert**  **- Butanol)** 

**Office of Research and Development** National Center for Environmental Assessment, Integrated Risk Information System **December 12, 2013 1**  

### General Information • tert - Butanol is a white crystalline solid or colorless liquid (above 77 ° C).
• tert - Butanol is used as a solvent, denaturant for alcohols, dehydrating agent, and in the manufacture of methyl methacrylate, flotation agents, fruit essences, perfumes, and proposed as an octane booster in gasoline
• tert - Butanol is subject to reporting under section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to- Know Act (EPCRA) (T

oxics Release Inventory (TRI) Chemical) 

### Exposure • Individuals wo rking at facilities where tert - butanol is produced or used may be exposed.
• General population exposures may occur through the ingestion of drinking water and foods and inhalation of air containing tert - butanol.**2 3**  

## Preliminary Materials for the IRIS Assessment of tert - Butanol :
• Draft literature search strategy • Draft literature search results • Preliminary evidence tables • Preliminary exposure - response arrays *These materials are available online at: http://w ww.epa.gov/iris/publicmeeting/iris_bimonthly-dec2013/mtg_docs.htm**4** Literature Search Strategy
• The literature search identified more than 2,400 studies for tertbutanol.
• 184 references are being considered for the assessment after an initial screen for relevance. Data Extraction to Evidence Ta bles
• 33 references directly informing hazard identification are described in evidence tables. 33 studies in evidence tables**5** 

## Features of the tert - Butanol Database **Chronic Subchronic**  **Tw o**  **- Gen**  **Repro/ Dev**  **MOA**

**Information PBPK**  Oral      Inhalation    

• Human data on exposures to tert - butanol consist of a case report, an occupational study wi th co- exposures to other solvents, and studies assessing acute ef

fects.**6** 

### Endpoints with Data for Evaluating Hazard
• Kidney Effects • Thyroid Effects • Reproductive, Developmental, and Neurodevelopmental Effects • Central Nervous System (CNS) Effects • Other Systemic Effects (Body Weight, Liver

, and Urinary Bladder) • Genotoxic Effects 

### Scientific Considerations

• PBPK models • Metabolite in MTBE and ETBE models
• Kidney mode of action • Alpha2u -globulin - associated nephropathy • Chronic progressive nephropathy (CPN)
• Thyroid follicular cell tumors**7** 

## EP A welcomes all comments, such as : • Clarity and transparency of materials • Additional approach for identifying studies • Selection of studies for data extraction • Study quality considerations • Additional studies that may inform the assessment
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 986 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 986

  To release to the State of Arkansas a reversionary interest in Camp 
                          Joseph T. Robinson.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 2, 2019

Mr. Boozman (for himself and Mr. Cotton) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To release to the State of Arkansas a reversionary interest in Camp 
                          Joseph T. Robinson.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RELEASE OF REVERSIONARY INTEREST.

    The United States releases to the State of Arkansas the 
reversionary interest described in sections 2 and 3 of the Act entitled 
``An Act authorizing the transfer of part of Camp Joseph T. Robinson to 
the State of Arkansas'', approved June 30, 1950 (64 Stat. 311, chapter 
429), in and to the surface estate of the land constituting Camp Joseph 
T. Robinson, Arkansas, which lies in a part of section 35, township 3 
north, range 12 west, Pulaski County, Arkansas, consisting of 
approximately 141.52 acres.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 74.15 Notice of the right to appeal a finding of ineligibility.

Persons determined to be ineligible by the Administrator will be notified in writing of the determination, the right to petition for a reconsideration of the determination of ineligibility to the Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights, and the right to submit any documentation in support of eligibility.
AGENDA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

OFFICE OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY

PUBLIC WORKSHOP ON A RULEMAKING TO CONSIDER ENERGY EFFICIENCY

STANDARDS

FOR DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMERS

PLACE OF WORKSHOP: FORRESTAL BUILDING

1000 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE, SW

ROOM I E-245

WASHINGTON, DC 20585

TELEPHONE: 202-586-9127

TELEFAX: 202-256-4617

DATE AND TIME: WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 2000

9:00 A.M. - 5:00 P.M.

PURPOSE OF THE WORKSHOP

The purpose of this public workshop is to hear the views of interested persons on the

issues and process involved in a rulemaking to consider energy efficiency standards

for distribution transformers. The Department will consider the views presented

and comments submitted in formulating its approach in the rulemaking.

1. OPENING REMARKS AND INTRODUCTIONS

II. AGENDA REVIEW

III. DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMERS - TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION (Estimated

Time for Presentation and Discussion)

A. Introduction (:30)

B. Market and Technology Assessment (1:30)

1. Product Class

2. Characterization of Baseline Distribution Transformers

3. Retail Prices and Markups

C. Screening Analysis (:30)

 EE-RM/STD-00-550 COMMENT 02BB
D. Engineering Analysis (1:00)

1. Engineering Analysis Approaches

2. Transformer Design Loads and Operational Loading

E. Life-Cycle Cost Analysis (:15)

F. Consumer Sub-group Analysis (:15)

G. National Energy Saving and Net Present Value Analysis (:15)

H. Manufacturer Impact Analysis (1:00)

1. Utility Impact Analysis (:15)

J. Environmental Analysis (:15)

K. Net National Employment Impact (:15)

TV. ADJOURNMENT

 EE-RM/STD-00-550 COMMENT 02BB
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99

                                  UNDERTAKINGS

     For the purposes of complying with the amendments to the rules governing
Form S-8 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act"), the
Registrant hereby undertakes as follows, which undertaking shall be
incorporated by reference into Registrant's Statement on Form S-8 Nos.
333-04273 (filed May 22, 1996), 333-175155 (filed December 2, 1996),
333-41447 (filed December 4, 1997) and 333-92531 (filed December 10,1999):

     Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities
     Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of
     the Registrant, the Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of
     the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against
     public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore,
     unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against
     such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant of expenses
     incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the
     Registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding)
     is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in
     connection with the securities being registered, the Registrant will,
     unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by
     controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the
     question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as
     expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final
     adjudication of such issue.
#### § 513.63 Freedom of Information Act requests on behalf of an inmate or former inmate.

A request for records concerning an inmate or former inmate made by an authorized representative of that inmate or former inmate will be treated as in § 513.61, on receipt of the inmate's or former inmate's written authorization. This authorization must be dated within three (3) months of the date of the request letter. Identification data, as listed in 28 CFR 16.41, must be provided.
### §459i–9. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated not to exceed $28,500,000 for the acquisition of lands and interests in lands and not to exceed $27,840,000 for development of the seashore.

(Pub. L. 92–536, §10, Oct. 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 1068; Pub. L. 95–625, title II, §201(3), Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3473.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1978—Pub. L. 95–625 substituted "$28,500,000" for "$10,500,000".
!""

#


$%&'&()*+,-!

.	
%/

		
0
	11

0	,


2

4 "

3.
	0

 !""

#


	

0.	564


7








.	#'	8

5
8
	9	3:2.

0	
.
.
	
	82

7".	.	#0
5
8	#.
		
8


8.

;
4

.




	
	
!

!8


"




1
4<552
=
2$>%/%?

@

4
2
=
2$*/?>A

	5
.	
2
=
2$+&*?*

355	804		2
=
2$(A//&

:6"B"32116

&(%6	
	2*(/

.
		2
	*//*(

C>&>DA+>'+>>>%&'*&?A(>

Jul 5 2017 /s/ Frank J. Santoro

7/5/17

Case 15-50928-FJS Doc 71 Filed 07/05/17 Entered 07/05/17 10:17:07 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
:<-"7

,
,0:1"104::@2



1 4<11 2E

@@" 477"2E

:1:2E

0:1"104::@22E

311:004::@2E



,
,	

34	


FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF

	

34	
2#
C
D:




,
,3	

:4.2!
4


FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF

0.	564
27




.	.	

.

"

3.
	0	55

	
	



.	#

5	

8	52
	
	2./
	!52*(%>4

,
,0:1"104::@2

FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF

1 4<11 2E

@@" 477"2E

:1:2E

0:1"104::@22E

311:004::@2E


.
"

3.
	0	
#


.	
B
2116

&(%6	
	2*(/

.
		2
	*//*(

:5	04	

58	1	-
8





Case 15-50928-FJS Doc 71 Filed 07/05/17 Entered 07/05/17 10:17:07 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3
*>*G	2//(


		.2:*/?&*

0.	564


.	
%/7



+>(@
#


52?(*

.
		2:*//*(


.!.

%/%
1	

 
2:*/A)/

	

6

	1	55)(**'%CD2.
#
.		55

	
	

.	

.

	#

4

,
,0:1"104::@2



1
4<552
=


@

4
2
=


	5
.	
2
=


0	5584		22
=


355	804		2
=


:

0	

%&'*&?A(>

Case 15-50928-FJS Doc 71 Filed 07/05/17 Entered 07/05/17 10:17:07 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3
### §424a–2. Conveyance of portion of park to Georgia

The Secretary of the Interior, in his discretion, is authorized to convey, without consideration but under such terms and conditions as he may deem advisable, to the State of Georgia all of lot 78 and approximately one hundred and fifty acres of lot 114, Eleventh District, fourth section, of Dade County, Georgia, now a part of the Chickamauga-Chattanooga National Military Park.

(Mar. 5, 1942, ch. 148, §2, 56 Stat. 133.)
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

214) ll-K-(I)-27 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/200811:12:55 AM Sheet 214 of 325 
P.2 

A 

II-K-(I)-27 

PREMIUM ON NATURAL GAS AS A BOILER FUEL IN THE 

INDUSTRIAL SECTOR. 

EEA, Inc. 

May 29, 1979. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(I)-27
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 85718 / April 25, 2019

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-18496

In the Matter of 

FALCONRIDGE OIL TECHNOLOGIES CORP.,

FLASR, INC., and

FONON CORP.

NOTICE THAT INITIAL DECISION HAS BECOME FINAL

The time for filing a petition for review of the initial decision in this proceeding has 

expired. No such petition has been filed by Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp., FLASR, Inc., 

or Fonon Corp. and the Commission has not chosen to review the decision on its own initiative.

Accordingly, notice is hereby given, pursuant to Rule 360(d) of the Commission's Rules 

of Practice,1that the initial decision of the administrative law judge has become the final 

decision of the Commission with respect to Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp., FLASR, Inc., 

and Fonon Corp.2The order contained in that decision is hereby declared final. The initial 

decision ordered that, pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the 

registrations of each class of registered securities of Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp., 

FLASR, Inc., and Fonon Corp. are hereby revoked. The revocations are effective as of April 26, 

2019.

For the Commission, by the Office of the General Counsel, pursuant to delegated 

authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

 Acting Secretary

 

1

 17 C.F.R. § 201.360(d).

2

 COPsync, Inc., Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp., FLASR, Inc., and Fonon Corp., Initial 

Decision Release No. 1332 (Dec. 13, 2018), 2018 WL 6571153. The Central Index Key 

numbers are: 1401859 for Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.; 1577189 for FLASR, Inc.; and 

1163300 for Fonon Corp.