alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §460k. Public recreation use of fish and wildlife conservation areas; compatibility with conservation purposes; appropriate incidental or secondary use; consistency with other Federal operations and primary objectives of particular areas; curtailment; forms of recreation not directly related to primary purposes of individual areas; repeal or amendment of provisions for particular areas

In recognition of mounting public demands for recreational opportunities on areas within the National Wildlife Refuge System, national fish hatcheries, and other conservation areas administered by the Secretary of the Interior for fish and wildlife purposes; and in recognition also of the resulting imperative need, if such recreational opportunities are provided, to assure that any present or future recreational use will be compatible with, and will not prevent accomplishment of, the primary purposes for which the said conservation areas were acquired or established, the Secretary of the Interior is authorized, as an appropriate incidental or secondary use, to administer such areas or parts thereof for public recreation when in his judgment public recreation can be an appropriate incidental or secondary use: Provided, That such public recreation use shall be permitted only to the extent that is practicable and not inconsistent with other previously authorized Federal operations or with the primary objectives for which each particular area is established: Provided further, That in order to insure accomplishment of such primary objectives, the Secretary, after consideration of all authorized uses, purposes, and other pertinent factors relating to individual areas, shall curtail public recreation use generally or certain types of public recreation use within individual areas or in portions thereof whenever he considers such action to be necessary: And provided further, That none of the aforesaid refuges, hatcheries, game ranges, and other conservation areas shall be used during any fiscal year for those forms of recreation that are not directly related to the primary purposes and functions of the individual areas until the Secretary shall have determined—

(a) that such recreational use will not interfere with the primary purposes for which the areas were established, and

(b) that funds are available for the development, operation, and maintenance of these permitted forms of recreation. This section shall not be construed to repeal or amend previous enactments relating to particular areas.

(Pub. L. 87–714, §1, Sept. 28, 1962, 76 Stat. 653; Pub. L. 89–669, §9, Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 930.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1966—Pub. L. 89–669 substituted "areas within the National Wildlife Refuge System" for "national wildlife refuges, game ranges" in introductory text.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 87–714, which enacted this subchapter, is popularly known as the "Refuge Recreation Act".
(No. 81-CC-1058

#### Stephen R. Thomas and Kristina Thomas, his wife, Claimants, *v.*The State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed September 24, 1982.*

Strom, Strom, Oakley & Ellis, for Claimants.

Tyrone C. Fahner, Attorney General (Sandra L. Andina, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.

*803Poch, J.

This matter comes before the Court on joint stipulation of the parties to entry of an award in favor of Claimants. The Court being duly advised, hereby finds as follows:

1. Claimants were the owners of a piece of property consisting of a house, a lot, and several black locust and other trees, located at 392 Business Route 20 (Northeast corner of Shaw Road and Business Route 20), Belvidere, Illinois.

2. The trees formed the northern perimeter of Claimants’ property. On the northern side of the trees was Respondent’s right-of-way and Route 20, a heavily travelled road.

3. The trees formed a sight and sound barrier between Claimants’ property and Route 20, as the right-of-way was situated on a steep slope below the property.

4. The black locust trees sent out an extensive root system; from this root system emanated several offshoot, or volunteer black locust trees which sprouted on the steep slope of Respondent’s right-of-way.

5. The volunteer trees had to be removed because continual mowing of the steep slope around them would have caused serious erosion.

6. Respondent used herbicides to remove these volunteer trees, but the herbicides were applied over so wide an area as to kill the eight black locust trees located on Claimants’ property.

7. The proper measure of damages in this cause is the difference in the fair market value of the property with and without the trees.

*8048. The parties have stipulated that the difference in fair market value in this case amounts to $2,500.00.

Therefore, it is hereby ordered that Claimants be and hereby are awarded $2,500.00 (two thousand five hundred dollars) in full and final satisfaction of their claim.
EXHIBIT 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, Morteza Ejabat, Chief Executive Officer of Zhone Technologies, Inc. (the Company), and Kirk Misaka, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that, to their knowledge:



|1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 8, 2005



|                                       |  |  |  |                                    
|-------------------------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------
|                                       |  | 
|/s/ MORTEZA EJABAT                     |  |  |  | /s/ KIRK MISAKA                    
|Morteza Ejabat Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Kirk Misaka Chief Financial
Officer
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 18

- 00416

- CV
City of Palmview v. Agua Special Utility District

On a ppeal from the 389th District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. C

- 0667

- 18

- H

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having consider ed this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision certified below for observance. March 7, 2019
#### § 1.1 Purpose.

The purpose of the regulations in this part is to implement and carry out the provisions of Federal law relating to the administration of Federal aid for highways.
§ 69.100 Conditions on use of funds. ( a ) No appropriated funds may be expended by the recipient of a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement to pay any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with any of the following covered Federal actions: the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
( b ) Each person who requests or receives from an agency a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement shall file with that agency a certification, set forth in appendix A, that the person has not made, and will not make, any payment prohibited by paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) Each person who requests or receives from an agency a Federal contract, grant, loan, or a cooperative agreement shall file with that agency a disclosure form, set forth in appendix B, if such person has made or has agreed to make any payment using nonappropriated funds (to include profits from any covered Federal action), which would be prohibited under paragraph (a) of this section if paid for with appropriated funds.
( d ) Each person who requests or receives from an agency a commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan shall file with that agency a statement, set forth in appendix A, whether that person has made or has agreed to make any payment to influence or attempt to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with that loan insurance or guarantee.
( e ) Each person who requests or receives from an agency a commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan shall file with that agency a disclosure form, set forth in appendix B, if that person has made or has agreed to make any payment to influence or attempt to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with that loan insurance or guarantee.
### §430h–7. Exclusion of lands from park

#### (a) Exclusion of certain lands

The park boundary is hereby revised to exclude those lands depicted as "Proposed Deletions" on the map entitled "Vicksburg National Military Park" numbered 306–80,007 and dated May 1990, which map shall be on file and available for public inspection in the Office of the National Park Service, Department of the Interior. Exclusive jurisdiction over the lands excluded from the park is hereby retroceded to the State of Mississippi.

#### (b) Transfer to adjacent owners

(1) For a period ending four years after October 18, 1990, and subject to the provisions of paragraph (2), the Secretary is authorized to convey title to all or part of the lands referred to in subsection (a) to an owner of property adjacent to such lands, upon the application of such owner.

(2) No property shall be conveyed unless the application referred to in paragraph (1) is accompanied by a payment in an amount equal to—

(A) the fair market value of the land to be conveyed; and

(B) the administrative costs of such transfer incurred by the Secretary, including the costs of surveys, appraisals, and filing and recording fees.

#### (c) Excess property

Any lands not conveyed pursuant to subsection (b) shall be reported to the Administrator of General Services as excess to the needs of the Department of the Interior and shall be subject to transfer or disposition in accordance with chapters 1 to 11 of title 40 and division C (except sections 3302, 3307(e), 3501(b), 3509, 3906, 4710, and 4711) of subtitle I of title 41.

(Pub. L. 101–442, title I, §102, Oct. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 1019.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

In subsec. (c), "chapters 1 to 11 of title 40 and division C (except sections 3302, 3307(e), 3501(b), 3509, 3906, 4710, and 4711) of subtitle I of title 41" substituted for "the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, as amended" on authority of Pub. L. 107–217, §5(c), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1303, which Act enacted Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, and Pub. L. 111–350, §6(c), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3854, which Act enacted Title 41, Public Contracts.
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

Washington, D.C. 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 91870 / May 12, 2021

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension of trading 

in the securities of Texas South Energy, Inc. (TXSO) commencing at 9:30 a.m. EDT on May 13, 

2021 and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EDT on May 26, 2021:

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of the foregoing company due 

to a lack of current and accurate information about the company because it has not filed certain 

periodic reports with the Commission. This order was entered pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act).

The Commission cautions brokers, dealers, shareholders and prospective purchasers that they 

should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available 

information and any information subsequently issued by this company.

Brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11, at 

the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered relating to the securities 

of the subject company unless and until the broker or dealer has strictly complied with all of the 

provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is required by the rule, it 

should refrain from entering quotations relating to the securities of this company that has been 

subject to the trading suspension until such time as it has familiarized itself with the rule and is 

certain that all of its provisions have been met. Any broker or dealer with questions regarding

the rule should contact the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, DC 

at (202) 551-5777. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation which is in violation of the rule,

the Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement action. 

If any broker, dealer or other person has any information which may relate to this matter, they 

should immediately communicate it to the Delinquent Filings Branch of the Division of 

Enforcement at (202) 551-5466, or by e-mail at DelinquentFilings@sec.gov.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1240 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and at 68 FR 10355, Mar. 3, 2003.

#### § 1240.38 Fingerprinting of excluded aliens.

Every alien 14 years of age or older who is excluded from admission to the United States by an immigration judge shall be fingerprinted, unless during the preceding year he or she has been fingerprinted at an American consular office.
Slip Op. 23-

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

AJMAL STEEL TUBES & PIPES 

INDUSTRIES LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant,

WHEATLAND TUBE COMPANY,

Defendant-Intervenor.

Before: Jane A. Restani, Judge

Court No. 21-00587

JUDGMENT

Following remand, the United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) submitted 

the Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, ECF No. 43 (Jan. 26, 2023)

(“Remand Results”). Neither plaintiff Ajmal Steel Tubes & Pipes Industries LLC nor defendantintervenor Wheatland Tube Company submitted comments on the Remand Results. The 

Remand Results comply with the court’s remand order. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the Remand Results by Commerce are 

SUSTAINED.

/s/ Jane A. Restani

Jane A. Restani, Judge

Dated: 0DUFK , 2023

New York, New York
Case 16

30731KLP Doc 171 Filed 02/24/21 Entered 02/25/21 12:14:12 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 4
Case 16-30731-KLP Doc 171 Filed 02/24/21 Entered 02/25/21 12:14:12 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 4
Case 16-30731-KLP Doc 171 Filed 02/24/21 Entered 02/25/21 12:14:12 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 4
Case 16-30731-KLP Doc 171 Filed 02/24/21 Entered 02/25/21 12:14:12 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 4
§ 710.307 Construction advertising. ( a ) The grantee must manage real property acquired for a project until it is required for construction. Except for properties acquired under the early acquisition provisions of 23 CFR 710.501(e), clearance of improvements can be scheduled during the acquisition phase of the project using sale/removal agreements, separate demolition contracts, or be included as a work item in the construction contract. The grantee shall develop ROW availability statements and certifications related to project acquisitions as described in 23 CFR 635.309.
( b ) The FHWA-SDOT Stewardship/Oversight Agreement will specify SDOT responsibility for the review and approval of the ROW availability statements and certifications in accordance with applicable law. Generally, for non-National Highway System projects, the SDOT has full responsibility for determining that right-of-way is available for construction. For non-SDOT grantees, FHWA will be responsible for the review and approval.
### §460hh–3. Law governing; Arbuckle Dam and Reservoir

(a) Except as otherwise provided in this subchapter, the Secretary shall administer the recreation area in accordance with the provisions of the Act of August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535; 16 U.S.C. 1, 2–4),1 as amended and supplemented.

(b) Nothing contained in this subchapter shall affect or interfere with the authority of the Secretary by the Act of August 24, 1962 (76 Stat. 395) [43 U.S.C. 616k et seq.], to operate the Arbuckle Dam and Reservoir in accordance with and for the purposes set forth in that Act.

(Pub. L. 94–235, §4, Mar. 17, 1976, 90 Stat. 236.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Act of August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535; 16 U.S.C. 1, 2–4), referred to in subsec. (a), is act Aug. 25, 1916, ch. 408, 39 Stat. 535, known as the National Park Service Organic Act, which enacted sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 of this title and provisions set out as a note under section 100101 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs. Sections 1 to 4 of the Act were repealed and restated as section 1865(a) of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and section 100101(a), chapter 1003, and sections 100751(a), 100752, 100753, and 102101 of Title 54 by Pub. L. 113–287, §§3, 4(a)(1), 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3094, 3260, 3272. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables. For disposition of former sections of this title, see Disposition Table preceding section 100101 of Title 54.

Act of August 24, 1962, referred to in subsec. (b), is Pub. L. 87–594, Aug. 24, 1962, 76 Stat. 395, which was classified to subchapter XL (§616k et seq.) of chapter 12 of Title 43, Public Lands, and which was omitted from the Code because of limited applicability.

1 See References in Text note below.
Steven L. Higgs, Esq. (22720)

Steven L. Higgs, P.C.

9 Franklin Road, S.W.

Roanoke, VA 24011-2403

(540) 400-7990

Counsel for Secured Creditor

1

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA,

Alexandria Division

In re

Darrall A Griffin,

 Debtor.

Case No. 16-10580-RGM

Chapter 13

OBJECTION TO CONFIRMATION

NOW COMES PROF-2013-M4 Legal Title Trust II, by U.S. Bank National Association, 

as Legal Title Trustee, secured creditor in the above-entitled Bankruptcy proceeding, holds the 

senior lien on the subject property generally described as 759 Delaware Ave SW 179, 

Washington DC 20024, and hereby submits the following objections to the confirmation of that 

certain Chapter 13 Plan (the "Plan") proposed by Debtor:

LACK OF ADEQUATE FUNDING

The Plan is not adequately funded. 11 U.S.C. §1325(a)(5)(B)(ii) requires full payment of 

the allowed claim of this objecting Secured Creditor. The arrearage amount provided for in 

Debtor’s Chapter 13 Plan is insufficient to cure the pre-petition arrears owed to Secured 

Creditor. The actual arrearage amount will be disclosed in a timely filed Proof of Claim and is 

anticipated to be approximately $2,407.90. Accordingly, even if all payments are tendered 

pursuant to the Plan, they will not be sufficient to satisfy Secured Creditor’s claim in full.

CONCLUSION

Any Chapter 13 Plan proposed by Debtor must provide for and eliminate the objections 

Case 16-10580-RGM Doc 18 Filed 04/29/16 Entered 04/29/16 16:52:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
2

specified above in order to be feasible and to provide adequate protection to this objecting 

secured creditor. It is respectfully requested that confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan as 

proposed by Debtor, be denied.

WHEREFORE, Secured Creditor PROF-2013-M4 Legal Title Trust II, by U.S. Bank 

National Association, as Legal Title Trustee prays that confirmation of the proposed Chapter 13 

plan submitted by the Debtor herein be denied.

PROF-2013-M4 Legal Title Trust II, by U.S. Bank National 

Association, as Legal Title Trustee 

By: /s/ Steven L. Higgs

 Steven L. Higgs, Esq. (VSB # 22720)

Steven L. Higgs, P.C.

Certificate

I hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing Objections to Proposed Chapter 13 Plan 

and Confirmation Thereof was served by regular mail or email this 29th day of April, 2016, on 

all necessary parties including: Thomas P. Gorman, Trustee, 300 N. Washington St., Ste. 400, 

Alexandria, VA 22314; Tommy Andrews, Jr., Esquire, Counsel for Debtor, Tommy Andrews, Jr. 

P.C., 122 North Alfred St., Alexandria, VA 22314; and, Darrall A Griffin, Debtor, 5672 Tower 

Hill Cir, Alexandria, VA 22315-4000.

/s/ Steven L. Higgs

Case 16-10580-RGM Doc 18 Filed 04/29/16 Entered 04/29/16 16:52:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 62 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 62

  Disapproving the recommendation of the Administrator of the Federal 
    Aviation Administration to realign Binghamton, NY (BGM) TRACON 
   operations and Elmira, NY (ELM) TRACON operations to Wilkes-Barre/
                       Scranton, PA (AVP) TRACON.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 12, 2019

Mrs. Gillibrand (for herself and Mr. Schumer) introduced the following 
joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Disapproving the recommendation of the Administrator of the Federal 
    Aviation Administration to realign Binghamton, NY (BGM) TRACON 
   operations and Elmira, NY (ELM) TRACON operations to Wilkes-Barre/
                       Scranton, PA (AVP) TRACON.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves of 
the recommendation of the Administrator of the Federal Aviation 
Administration relating to the realignment of Binghamton, NY (BGM) 
TRACON operations and Elmira, NY (ELM) TRACON operations to Wilkes-
Barre/Scranton, PA (AVP) TRACON, as set forth in recommendation #4 in 
the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration 
Section 804 Collaborative Workgroup Federal Aviation Administration 
National Facilities Realignment and Consolidation Report Parts 4 & 5 
Recommendations submitted to Congress under section 804(b) of the FAA 
Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (49 U.S.C. 44501 note) on December 
3, 2019.
                                 <all>
```