alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §343d. Exclusion of lands; disposal as surplus property

The tract of land in Acadia National Park, State of Maine, comprising approximately three hundred acres and identified as the "Green Lake Fish Hatchery Tract" is excluded from Acadia National Park, and the said tract is authorized to be disposed of in accordance with the laws relating to the disposition of Federal property.

(July 24, 1956, ch. 667, 70 Stat. 597.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

For laws relating to the disposition of Federal property, referred to in text, see, generally, subtitle I of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works.
EXHIBIT
32.1
  Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of
2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Teliphone Corp.. (the “Company”) on Form
10–Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George Metrakos, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:
  1.      
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.      
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
  /s/
      George MetrakosGeorge
      Metrakos
                    Chief
      Executive Officer
 
 Dated: August
14, 2009
§ 345.20 Position classification. ( a ) Inmate worker positions must be assigned an appropriate level of pay. All inmate workers shall be informed of the objectives and principles of pay classification as a part of the routine orientation of new FPI inmate workers.
( b ) The Warden and SOI have the responsibility for position classification at each location.
CS 315822-J 09/16/2020

10 shay oo aad samayn karto si aad u maarayso 

astaamahaaga COVID-19 adigoo guriga jooga

Raaca La Heli Karo: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/if-you-are-sick/steps-when-sick.html

Haddii ay suurtogal tahay ama la xaqiijiyey inaad qabto COVID-19:

1. Guriga joog oo shaqada 

iyo dugsiga midna ha tagin. 

Oo ka joog meelaha kale ee 

dadwaynaha. Haddii ay khasab 

kugu tahay inaad baxdo, 

iska ilaali inaad isticmaasho 

gaadiidka dadwaynaha nooc 

kasta, isla-raacidda cid kale, 

ama tagaasida.

2. Astaamahaaga ula 

soco si dhaw. Haddii 

astaamahaagu ka sii daraan, 

wac bixiyahaaga daryeelka 

caafimaadka isla markiiba. 

3. Nasasho qaado oo 

dareere badan cab. 

4. Haddii aad leedahay 

ballan caafimaad, hore 

u sii wac bixiyaha 

daryeelka caafimaad oo 

u sheeg inaad qabto ama 

laga yaabo inaad qabto 

COVID-19.

5. Wixii ah xaaladaha 

degdegga ah ee caafimaad, 

wac 911 oo u sheeg 

hawlwadeenka kala 

dirista qaabilsan inaad 

qabto ama laga yaabo inaad 

qabto COVID-19.

6. Haddii aad qufacayso 

ama hindhisayso, ku 

dabool afka iyo sankaaga 

tiish ama isticmaal laabka 

suxulkaaga.

7. Ku dhaq gacmahaaga in 

badan saabuun iyo biyo ugu 

yaraan 20 ilbiriqsi ama ku nadiifi 

gacmahaaga gacmo nadiifiye 

alkoolo ka samaysan oo ugu 

yaraan 60% alkoolo ah. 

8. Intii suurtogal ah, waa inaad 

joogto qol gaar ah oo ka gaar 

ah dadka kale ee gurigaaga 

jooga. Sidoo kale waa inaad 

isticmaasho xamaam gaar ah, 

hadduu jiro. Haddii aad u baahan 

tahay inaad ka ag dhawaato 

dadka kale ee joogo gudaha ama 

dibadda guriga, xiro maaskaro.

9. Iska ilaali la wadaagista 

shayada shakhsiyeed dadka 

kale ee gurigaaga jooga, sida 

suxuunta, tuwaalada, iyo 

gogosha sariirta.

10. Nadiifi oogooyinka oo 

dhan kuwaasi oo inta badan 

la taabto, sida marfishyada, 

miisaska dushooda, iyo 

sidooyinka albaabada. 

Isticmaal buufinaha ama 

masaxaadaha nadiifinta 

guryaha loo isticmaalo, 

adigoo raacaya tilmaamaha 

summadda. 

cdc.gov/coronavirus
```
**EXHIBIT 11****HICKOK INCORPORATED****CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS****PER COMMON SHARE AND SHARE EQUIVALENTS****Year Ended September 30,****------------------------****200220012000********NET INCOME**Net income <loss> applicable tocommon shares for basic earningsper share                         $    244,406   $  (662,106)  $  (410,604)                                  ------------   ------------  ------------Net income <loss> applicable tocommon shares for dilutedearnings per share                $    244,406   $  (662,106)  $  (410,604)                                  ------------   ------------  ------------**SHARES OUTSTANDING**Weighted average shares for basicearnings per share                   1,219,750      1,218,374     1,204,276Net effect of dilutive stock options - based on the treasury stock method using year-end market price, if higher than average market price                    21,370          -    *       -     *------------    -----------  ------------Total shares for diluted earningsper share                            1,241,120      1,218,374     1,204,276Basic Earnings Per Common Share   $        .20    $      (.54)  $      (.34)                                  ------------    ------------  ------------Diluted Earnings Per Common Share $        .20    $      (.54)  $      (.34)                                  ------------    ------------  ------------*  Net effect of stock options was anti-dilutive for the period.
```
This .zip file contains graphic files (in .png format) of each chart and graph in the Economic Research Service report "Using Crop Genetic Resources To Help Agriculture Adapt to Climate Change: Economics and Policy," EIB-139, published in April 2015. The content and context of these files is as of the publication date of the report. After time, the material may not reflect the current ERS program of work, may be outdated, and/or superseded, so please visit the website to obtain the latest information: www.ers.usda.gov. Any reuse of these images should include attribution to "Economic Research Service/USDA."

The following inventory lists each of the files in this folder.


File name		Description
(Fig-01.png)		Figure 1 - National Plant Germplasm System (NPGS) budget, 1992-2012
(Fig-02.png)		Figure 2 - National Plant Germplasm System (NPGS) germplasm distribution, 1992-2012
(Fig-03.png)		Figure 3 - Climate change and research advances in crop genetics could increase the use of 
genetic resources
# STATE OF LOUIS]ANA COURTOF APPEAL, FIRSTCIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA IN THE INTEREST OF M. N. (DOB: 1/22/ 09) , M. N. (DOB: 7 / 2 2 / 15) , AND Z • 0 • (DOB : 5/19/21) NO. 2022 

## cw 1376 MARCH 03, 2023 In Re: D.O., applying for supervisory writs, City Court of East St. Tammany, Parish of St. Tammany, No. 21JS3028. BEFORE: GUIDRY, C.J., WOLFE, AND MILLER, JJ. WRIT DENIED.

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT JMG EW SMM
### §441k. Acquisition of property for park

#### (a) Consent of State or Oglala Sioux Tribe of South Dakota; transfer from Federal agency

Subject to the provisions of subsection (b) hereof, the Secretary of the Interior may, within the boundaries of the park, acquire lands and interests in lands by donation, purchase with donated or appropriated funds, or exchange, except that any lands or interests in lands owned by the State of South Dakota, a political subdivision thereof, or the Oglala Sioux Tribe of South Dakota may be acquired only with the consent of owner. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, lands and interests in lands located within the park under the administrative jurisdiction of any other Federal agency may be transferred to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary without a transfer of funds.

#### (b) Easements

As to lands located within the boundaries of the park but outside the boundaries of the gunnery range referred to in section 441l of this title, the Secretary of the Interior may acquire only rights-of-way and scenic easements.

(Pub. L. 90–468, §2, Aug. 8, 1968, 82 Stat. 663; Pub. L. 95–625, title VI, §611, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3521.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Word "park" substituted in text for "monument" pursuant to Pub. L. 95–625, §611, which is classified to section 441e–1 of this title and which redesignated Badlands National Monument as Badlands National Park.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6543
ROBERT LEE BROCK, a/k/a Two Souls Walker, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusWARDEN HINKLE; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, State of Virginia, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-96-153-2) Submitted: August 15, 1996 Decided: August 21, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Lee Brock, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying him leave to file a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brock v. Hinkle , No. CA-96-153-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 22, 1996). We further deny Appellant's motions for the appointment of counsel, immediate relief, and public access. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

__________________________________________

In Re:

Timothy A. Krebs Chapter 13

 Tina E. Krebs

Case No: 15-14061-KHK

 Debtors.

__________________________________________

DEBTORS’ NON-OPPOSITON TO CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE’S

MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM THE AUTOMATIC STAY

COME NOW, Debtors Timothy A. Krebs and Tina E. Krebs, and each of them, by counsel, 

and hereby respectfully advise this Honorable Court that they do not oppose the motion for relief 

from the automatic stay filed herein by Capital One Auto Finance, a division of Capital One 

N.A., on about January 3, 2018, as Doc 33. chapter 13 trustee’s Motion to Dismiss, filed herein 

as Doc 59 on 12/04/17.

Timothy A. Krebs & Tina E. Krebs

By Counsel,

Dated: January 22, 2018 /s/ Scott Weible, Esq.

Scott Weible, Esq., VSB #75633

Weible Law Firm PLLC

1846 E. Innovation Park Drive

Oro Valley, AZ 85755-1963

scott@weible.com

(703) 754-2092

 Counsel for Debtors

///

///

///

///

Case 15-14061-KHK Doc 38 Filed 01/22/18 Entered 01/22/18 15:20:11 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that I have this 22nd day of January, 2018, transmitted a true copy of the 

foregoing Non-Opposition either electronically through the Court’s CM/ECF system, or by U.S. 

first class mail postage pre-paid, to the Debtor, to the Chapter 13 Trustee, and the United States 

Trustee if other than by electronic means is provided for at Local Bankruptcy Rule 2002-1(d)(3), 

and to all creditors and parties in interest on the mailing matrix maintained by the clerk of the 

court.

/s/ Scott Weible

Scott Weible

Case 15-14061-KHK Doc 38 Filed 01/22/18 Entered 01/22/18 15:20:11 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
# San 

# loaqu¡n Valley 

# k! HEALTHY

# AIR LIVING" ArR 

### PflrruTrflil 

### c0t{ïR0t 0tsTRtcT

September 

### 25,2013 Mr. Richard Corey Executive 

### Officer California 

### Air Resources Board 1001 "1"Street 

### P.O. Box

### 2815 Sacramento, CA 95812 Dear Mr. Corey: Enclosed is

### the State lmplementation Plan 

### (SlP) Package for

### the San Joaquin 

### Valley Unified

### Air Pollution 

### Control District (District) 2013 Plan for the 

### Revoked 1- 

### Hour Ozone Standard. 

### The District 

### Governing Board adopted the 2013 PIan

### for the 

### Revoked 1-Hour Ozone Standard at 

### a public hearing held 

### on September 19, 

### 2013. We request that 

### the California 

### Air Resources Board (ARB) 

### transmitthis plan and

### the appropriate documentation to

### the United States Environmental Protection 

### Agency (EPA) as 

### a SIP revision. 

### lncluded in

### this SIP Package are the 

### following attachments: 

## 1. ARB SIP 

### Completeness Checklist 

## 2. The 2013 Plan 

### for the 

### Revoked 1-Hour Ozone Standard with 

### Appendices 

## 3. Governing Board Resolution 

### Adopting the 2013 Plan for the 

### Revoked 1-Hour Ozone 

### Standard 

## 4. Governing Board Memo lf

### you have any 

### questions regarding 

### this plan, please contact 

### Anna Myers at 

### Anna.Myers@vallevair.orq or

### Jessica Fierro at

### Jessica.Fierro@valleyair.oro or at (559) 230-5800. 

### The District 

### thanks you and 

### your staff for your assistance. Since



### Samir r

### of Strategies 

### and lncentives


### Attachments
cc: S.

### Vanderspek
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1997
<CASH>                                       8,065,021
<SECURITIES>                                11,980,078
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,117,991
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  8,580,705
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            41,879,066
<PP&E>                                      15,487,545
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              63,652,616
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,215,317
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       580,195
<OTHER-SE>                                  48,361,579
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                63,652,616
<SALES>                                     87,745,980
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            87,745,980
<CGS>                                       66,413,954
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               77,684,951
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              47,439
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             12,726,257
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,935,770
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,790,487
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,790,487
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .67
        

</TABLE>
# C_2012194EN.01000702.xml

| 30.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/7

---

Order of the Court of 22 March 2012 — Italian Republic v European Commission

(Case C-200/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure - State aid - Incompatibility with the common market - Commission decision - Action for annulment - Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 - Article 1(c) - Alteration of existing aid - Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 - Article 4(1) - Temporary defensive mechanism for shipbuilding)

2012/C 194/11

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, agent, P. Gentili, avvocato dello Stato)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci and C. Urraca Caviedes, agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 February 2011 in Case T-3/09 Italy v Commission, by which the General Court dismissed an application for annulment of Commission Decision 2010/38/EC of 21 October 2008 on State aid C 20/08 (ex N 62/08) which Italy is planning to implement through a modification of scheme N 59/04 concerning a temporary defensive mechanism for shipbuilding (OJ 2010 L 17, p. 50)

Italy

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | The Italian Republic is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Italian Republic is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 204, 9.7.2011.

1

---
#### Twin Theatre Company *v.*Liquid Carbonic Company.

April 27, 1910.

Claim. Before Judge Ellis. Fulton superior court.

March 26, 1909.

*Lowndes Calhoup,*for plaintiff.

*Napier, Wright & Cox*and *J. M. Wood,*contra.

Evans, P. J,

A landlord levied a distress warrant on a soda fountain, which was claimed by one who had sold it to the tenant under a written contract retaining title thereto until the purchase-money was paid. The reserved-title note was not recorded within thirty days of its date, but was recorded before the levy of the distress warrant. The evidence showed a complete rescission of the contract of sale, and a surrender of the soda fountain by the tenant to the claimant prior to the levy. *Held,*that it was not error to direct a verdict for the claimant.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur:*
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 23

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

    As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our report dated February 3, 2000, included (or incorporated by reference) in
this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999, into the Company's
previously filed Registration Statements (File Nos. 2-99967, 33-35951,
333-04273, 333-10415, 333-175155, 333-18523, 333-38047, 333-41447 and
333-89437).

                                          ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 27, 2000
1 The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 99-1268

___________ Fred E. Christian, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Stivers Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: May 20, 1999 Filed: May 24, 1999

___________ Before FAGG, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Fred E. Christian appeals from the district court’s 1 order dismissing his action with prejudice. After careful review of the record we conclude briefing would serve no useful purpose and that the appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a). We also deny Mr. Christian’s motion for appointment of counsel on appeal.-2- A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
§ 543.14 Limitation or denial of attorney visits and correspondence. ( a ) An act by an attorney which violates Bureau regulations or institution guidelines and which threatens the security, good order, or discipline of the institution is grounds for limitation or denial by the Warden of the attorney's privileged visitation and correspondence rights. Acts by an attorney which may warrant such limitation or denial include, for example the following: ( 1 ) A false statement as to the attorney's identity or qualifications;
( 2 ) A plan, attempt, or act to introduce contraband into the institution;
( 3 ) A conspiracy to commit, an attempt to commit, or the actual commission of an act of violence within an institution; and
( 4 ) Encouraging an inmate to violate the law, Bureau of Prisons rules, or local implementing guidelines.
( b ) Unless the breach of regulations is extreme or repeated, limitation rather than a denial of visitation or correspondence rights is proper, especially where the inmate is represented by the attorney and is confronted with a court deadline. For example, the Warden may subject an attorney to a search of his person and belongings or may permit the attorney only non-privileged correspondence. The Warden shall also consider referral of the matter to the state agency regulating the attorney's professional conduct.
( c ) An act by an inmate in violation of Bureau regulations or institution guidelines warrants a limitation by the Warden of the inmate's correspondence or visiting rights with attorneys only if necessary to protect institution security, good order, or discipline. The Warden may not deny correspondence or visiting rights with attorneys generally.
( d ) The attorney may appeal any limitation or denial by the Warden of attorney visits or correspondence rights to the Regional Director. The inmate affected may appeal through the Administrative Remedy Procedures.
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 246 

Honoring the memory of the victims of the heinous attack at the Pulse 

nightclub on June 12, 2016. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 12, 2019 

Mr. SCOTT of Florida (for himself and Mr. RUBIO) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the memory of the victims of the heinous attack 

at the Pulse nightclub on June 12, 2016. 

Whereas, on June 12, 2016, a gunman inspired by the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria targeted the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, Florida, where he killed 49 innocent victims and wounded dozens more in a despicable attack; 

Whereas the attack at the Pulse nightclub was an attack on 

the LGBTQ community, the Hispanic community, the 

City of Orlando, the State of Florida, and the United 

States; 

Whereas the Orlando community continues to mourn the 

tragic loss of life, but has demonstrated remarkable 

strength, unity, and resilience in the aftermath of the 

horrendous event; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 246 ATS 

Whereas June 12 is designated as ‘‘Pulse Remembrance 

Day’’ in the State of Florida to honor the victims and 

survivors of the senseless attack; 

Whereas the people of the United States continue to pray for 

those affected by the tragedy; and 

Whereas June 12, 2019, marks 3 years since the lives of the 

49 innocent victims were tragically cut short by the 

senseless act of terrorism: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) commemorates the 49 victims killed in the 

3 attack at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, Florida, on 

4 June 12, 2016, and offers heartfelt condolences to 

5 the families, loved ones, and friends of the victims; 

6 (2) honors the dozens of survivors of the attack 

7 and pledges continued resolve to stand against ter8 rorism and hate; and 

9 (3) expresses gratitude to the brave law en10 forcement and emergency medical personnel who re11 sponded to the attack. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS