alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 13

- 00074

- CR

DAVID GENE THOMAS CONAWAY, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 432nd District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1253390D

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.2 

### O RDER
David Gene Thomas Conaway, appellant, has filed a motion to extend time to file the appellant brief in this matter. The brief is currently due May 18, 2013. In his motion, appellant does not provide the Court with a reasonable explanation of the need for an extension of time. This Court interprets Texas Rule of Appellate Proce dure 10.5(b)(1) as requiring counsel to provide the Court with specific information to justify a requested extension of time, including the cause numbers of other briefs filed, the dates they were filed, the dates of trials, how long those trials are expec ted to last, etc. Broad, general statements do not provide the required facts and are not adequate t o meet the requirements of the
R ule. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.5(b ) (1).
All future motions to extend time filed with this Court must contain case

- specific
i nformation adequate to justify the request, or they will be denied. In this instance, we grant appellant’s motion for an extension, for a period of thirty days from the current due date, making appellant’s brief now due on or before June 17, 2013. Furthe r requests for extensions will not be looked upon with favor.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: May 9, 2013
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

August 25, 2021

In the Matter of

GeoPetro Resources Co.,

File No. 500-1

ORDER OF SUSPENSION OF

TRADING

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of GeoPetro Resources Co.

(“GEOR1”) (CIK No. 1116927), an active California corporation located in San Francisco, CA

with a class of securities registered with the Commission pursuant to Securities Exchange Act of 

1934 ("Exchange Act") Section 12(g) because it is delinquent in its periodic filings with the 

Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-Q for the period 

ended September 30, 2014. On October 31, 2017, the Commission’s Division of Corporation 

Finance (“Corporation Finance”) sent a delinquency letter to GEOR requesting compliance with 

its periodic filing requirements, but GEOR did not receive the delinquency letter due to its failure 

to maintain a valid address on file with the Commission as required by Commission rules (Rule 

301 of Regulation S-T, 17 C.F.R. Section 232.301 and Section 5.4 of EDGAR Filer Manual). As 

of July 28, 2021, the common stock of GEOR was quoted on OTC Link operated by OTC 

Markets Group Inc. (formerly “Pink Sheets”) (“OTC Link”), had five market makers, and was

eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11(f)(3). 

 

1 The short form of each issuer’s name is also its stock symbol.
2

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors 

require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company. Therefore, it is 

ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the 

securities of the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on 

August 26, 2021, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on September 9, 2021.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary
**EXHIBIT23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENTAUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration StatementNo. 33-41323 of Hawkins, Inc. (the Company) on Form S-8 of our reportsdated June 13, 2003 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for theCompany for the year ended March 30, 2003.

 

 
| /s/ DELOITTE  & TOUCHE LLP |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
|                           |
| Minneapolis, Minnesota         |
| June 25, 2003                  |

 

1

----
Mi Familia

• Protege a tu familia contra la gripe

(influenza) al vacunarte.

• Se recomienda que todas las personas,

a partir de los 6 meses, se vacunen contra

la gripe.

• La vacuna contra la gripe te protege contra

esta enfermedad durante toda la temporada.

PARA USO OFICIAL

Para más información en 

español visite:

http://www.cdc.gov/flu
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 31, 2024

NO. 03

- 24

- 00411

- CR

Ex parte Derek W. Grinstead

APPEAL FROM THE 390TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, SMITH, AND THEOFANIS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an attempted appeal from a post

- conviction application for writ of habeas corpus entered
by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals

. Having reviewed the record, it appears that th is Court
lacks jurisdiction over this appeal . Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of
jurisdiction

. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs

is made.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), the undersigned, Robert Thistle, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of Micro Laboratories, Inc., (the "Company"),
does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

The Annual Report Form 10QSB for the three months ended June 30, 2004
of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1034, and the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:       August 16, 2004

By /s/Robert Thistle
   ----------------------
Robert Thistle
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 90892 / January 11, 2021

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-17886

In the Matter of

CHINA LINEN TEXTILE INDUSTRY, LTD.

NOTICE THAT INITIAL DECISION HAS BECOME FINAL

The time for filing a petition for review of the initial decision in this proceeding has 

expired. No such petition has been filed by China Linen Textile Industry, Ltd., and the 

Commission has not chosen to review the decision on its own initiative.

Accordingly, notice is hereby given, pursuant to Rule 360(d) of the Commission’s Rules 

of Practice,1that the initial decision of the administrative law judge has become the final 

decision of the Commission with respect to China Linen Textile Industry, Ltd.

2 The order 

contained in that decision is hereby declared final. The initial decision ordered that, pursuant to 

Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registration of each class of registered

securities of China Linen Textile Industry, Ltd., is revoked. The revocation is effective as of

January 12, 2021.

For the Commission, by the Office of the General Counsel, pursuant to delegated 

authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

 Secretary

 

1

 17 C.F.R. § 201.360(d).

2

 China Biopharma, Inc., China Linen Textile Industry, Ltd., China Water Group, Inc., Scout 

Exploration, Inc., and Teryl Resources Corp., Initial Decision Release No. 1399, 2020 WL

1558971 (Mar. 31, 2020). The Central Index Key number for China Linen Textile Industry, 

Ltd., is: 1336655.
Editorial Note on Part 1103
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1103 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and at 68 FR 10351, Mar. 5, 2003.

§ 1103.3 Denials, appeals, and precedent decisions. ( a ) *DHS regulations.* The regulations pertaining to denials, appeals, and precedent decisions of the Department of Homeland Security are contained in 8 CFR Chapter I.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) *DHS precedent decisions.* The Secretary of Homeland Security, or specific officials of the Department of Homeland Security designated by the Secretary with the concurrence of the Attorney General, may file with the Attorney General decisions relating to the administration of the immigration laws of the United States for publication as precedent in future proceedings, and upon approval of the Attorney General as to the lawfulness of such decision, the Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review shall cause such decisions to be published in the same manner as decisions of the Board and the Attorney General.
[31 FR 3062, Feb. 24, 1966, as amended at 37 FR 927, Jan. 21, 1972; 48 FR 36441, Aug. 11, 1983; 49 FR 7355, Feb. 29, 1984; 52 FR 16192, May 1, 1987; 54 FR 29881, July 17, 1989; 55 FR 20769, 20775, May 21, 1990; 55 FR 23345, June 7, 1990; 57 FR 11573, Apr. 6, 1992; 68 FR 9832, Feb. 28, 2003; 81 FR 92366, Dec. 19, 2016]
### §428a. Qualifications of members of commission

In appointing the members of the commission created by section 428 of this title the Secretary of the Interior shall, as far as practicable, select persons familiar with the terrain of the battlefield of Fort Donelson, Tennessee, and the historical events associated therewith.

(Mar. 26, 1928, ch. 248, §2, 45 Stat. 367; Ex. Ord. No. 6166, §2, June 10, 1933; Ex. Ord. No. 6228, §1, July 28, 1933; Pub. L. 86–738, §5, Sept. 8, 1960, 74 Stat. 876.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Transfer of administrative functions of park, see note set out under section 428 of this title.
#### § 490.705 Definitions.

All definitions in § 490.101 apply to this subpart. Unless otherwise specified, the following definitions apply in this subpart:

*Excessive delay* means the extra amount of time spent in congested conditions defined by speed thresholds that are lower than a normal delay threshold. For the purposes of this rule, the speed threshold is 20 miles per hour (mph) or 60 percent of the posted speed limit, whichever is greater.

*Peak Period* is defined as weekdays from 6 a.m. to 10 a.m. and either 3 p.m. to 7 p.m. or 4 p.m. to 8 p.m. State DOTs and MPOs may choose whether to use 3 p.m. to 7 p.m. or 4 p.m. to 8 p.m.
# Official Journal C 133A/31 M

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 133A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4831 May 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 133A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4831 May 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 133A/1 | Publication of a vacancy for Director (Grade A*14) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2005/1695 | 1 |
| 2005/C 133A/2 | Publication of a vacancy for Director (Grade A*14) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2005/1700 | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

Commission

2005/C 133A/1

Publication of a vacancy for Director (Grade A*14) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2005/1695

1

2005/C 133A/2

Publication of a vacancy for Director (Grade A*14) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2005/1700

2

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Malden Knitting Mills, Respondent, v. Leon Albert et al., Trading as Z. Alpert & Sons, Appellants.

*657Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
#### § 636.514 How may I provide notifications and debriefings?

You may provide pre-award or post-award notifications in accordance with State approved procedures. If an offeror requests a debriefing, you may provide pre-award or post-award debriefings in accordance with State approved procedures.
§ 750.106 Class 3 and 4 signs within informational sites. ( a ) Informational sites for the erection and maintenance of Class 3 and 4 advertising and informational signs may be established in accordance with § 1.35 of this chapter. The location and frequency of such sites shall be as determined by agreements between the Secretary of Transportation and the State highway departments.
( b ) Class 3 and 4 signs may be permitted within such informational sites in protected areas in a manner consistent with the following provisions: ( 1 ) No sign may be permitted which is not placed upon a panel.
( 2 ) No panel may be permitted to exceed 13 feet in height or 25 feet in length, including border and trim, but excluding supports.
( 3 ) No sign may be permitted to exceed 12 square feet in area, and nothing on such sign may be permitted to be legible from any place on the main-traveled way or a turning roadway.
( 4 ) Not more than one sign concerning a single activity or place may be permitted within any one informational site.
( 5 ) Signs concerning a single activity or place may be permitted within more than one informational site, but no Class 3 sign which does not also qualify as a Class 4 sign may be permitted within any informational site more than 12 air miles from the advertised activity.
( 6 ) No sign may be permitted which moves or has any animated or moving parts.
( 7 ) Illumination of panels by other than white lights may not be permitted, and no sign placed on any panel may be permitted to contain, include, or be illuminated by any other lights, or any flashing, intermittent, or moving lights.
( 8 ) No lighting may be permitted to be used in any way in connection with any panel unless it is so effectively shielded as to prevent beams or rays of light from being directed at any portion of the main-traveled way of the Interstate System, or is of such low intensity or brilliance as not to cause glare or to impair the vision of the driver of any motor vehicle, or to otherwise interfere with any driver's operation of a motor vehicle.
[23 FR 8793, Nov. 13, 1958, as amended at 35 FR 18719, Dec. 10, 1970; 41 FR 9321, Mar. 4, 1976]
<PAGE>

                                      IMPROVENET, INC.
                                  STOCK OPTION GRANT NOTICE
                                   1996 STOCK OPTION PLAN

ImproveNet, Inc. (the "COMPANY"), pursuant to its 1996 Stock Option Plan, as
amended (the "PLAN"), hereby grants to Optionholder an option to purchase the
number of shares of the Company's common stock set forth below (the "COMMON
STOCK").  This option is subject to all of the terms and conditions as set
forth herein and in the Stock Option Agreement, the Plan and the Notice of
Exercise, all of which are attached hereto and incorporated herein in their
entirety.

OPTIONHOLDER:                           < < NAME > >
DATE OF GRANT:                          < < GRANTDATE > >
VESTING COMMENCEMENT DATE:              < < VCD > >
NUMBER OF SHARES SUBJECT TO OPTION:     < < NUMBEROFSHARES > >
EXERCISE PRICE PER SHARE:               < < TOTALPRICE > >
EXPIRATION DATE:                        < < EXPIRATIONDATE > >

TYPE OF GRANT:      / / Incentive Stock Option     / / Nonstatutory Stock Option
EXERCISE SCHEDULE:  / / Same as Vesting Schedule   / / Early Exercise Permitted
VESTING SCHEDULE:   Vest over 4 years with 25% vesting after 1 year of
                    service and 1/48th vesting after each month of service
                    thereafter.

PAYMENT:            By one or a combination of the following items (described
                    in the Stock Option Agreement):

                             By cash or check
                             Pursuant to a Regulation T Program if the Shares
                             are publicly traded
                             By delivery of already-owned shares if the
                             Shares are publicly traded

ADDITIONAL TERMS/ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:  The undersigned Optionholder acknowledges
receipt of, and understands and agrees to, this Grant Notice, the Stock
Option Agreement and the Plan.  Optionholder further acknowledges that as of
the Date of Grant, this Grant Notice, the Option Agreement and the Plan set
forth the entire understanding between Optionholder and the Company regarding
the acquisition of stock in the Company and supersede all prior oral and
written agreements on that subject with the exception of (i) options
previously granted and delivered to Optionholder under the Plan, and (ii) the
following agreements only:



OTHER AGREEMENTS:          --------------------------------------------------

                           --------------------------------------------------


IMPROVENET, INC.                       OPTIONHOLDER:

By:
   ------------------------------       -------------------------------------

Title:                                  Date:
     ----------------------------            --------------------------------

Date:
     ----------------------------


ATTACHMENTS:  Stock Option Agreement, 1996 Stock Option Plan and Notice of
              Exercise
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 69873 / June 27, 2013

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-14909

____________________________________

 :

In the Matter of :

 :

OPPENHEIMERFUNDS, INC. :

:

and : ORDER GRANTING

: EXTENSION OF TIME

OPPENHEIMERFUNDS : TO SUBMIT PROPOSED

DISTRIBUTOR, INC., : PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

:

Respondents. :

____________________________________:

The Division of Enforcement (“Division”) has requested a second extension of 

time, until August 5, 2013, to submit a proposed Plan of Distribution (“Plan”) in the 

above-captioned matter, under Rule 1101(a) of the Commission Rules on Fair Fund 

and Disgorgement Plans. 

On June 6, 2012, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) 

entered an Order Instituting Administrative and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings 

Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 15(b)(4) of the Securities 

Exchange Act of 1934, Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 

1940, and Sections 9(b) and 9(f) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, Making 

Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”) 

(Securities Act Rel. No. 9329, June 6, 2012). The Order required OppenheimerFunds, 

Inc. to pay $9,879,706 in disgorgement, $1,487,190 in prejudgment interest, and 

$24,000,000 in civil penalty into a Fair Fund and required the appointment of a Fund 
Administrator to develop and administer the Plan in accordance with the Commission 

Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans.

On March 14, 2013, the Commission issued an Order Appointing Fund 

Administrator and Approving Fund Administrator Bond (Exchange Act Rel. No. 

69138, March 14, 2013). The Fund Administrator and Commission staff have worked 

diligently to develop an appropriate plan of distribution, but require additional time.

Accordingly, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 

Division’s request for an extension of time until August 5, 2013 to submit a proposed 

Plan is granted. 

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority. 

Elizabeth M. Murphy 

Secretary
(66 South. 394)

No. 20774.

#### STATE v. REAMES.

(Nov. 4, 1914.)

*(Syllabus by the Court.)*

'Courts <&wkey;224^SuPREME Courts — Jurisdiction — Judgment Forfeiting Appearance Bond.

The Supreme Court has no jurisdiction over an appeal from a judgment forfeiting an appearance bond for $150, in a prosecution for carrying concealed weapons. In misdemeanors, the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court depends on the punishment actually imposed. Const. 1913, art. 85.

[Ed. Note. — Eor other cases, see Courts, Cent. Dig. §§ 487, 608, 609, 614, 616, 617; Dee. Dig. ■&wkey;224J

Appeal from Second District Court, Parish of Webster; J. N. Sandlin,'Judge.

An appearance bond given by Thomas Reames, conditioned for his appearance to answer an information charging him with carrying concealed weapons, was forfeited and a judgment rendered in solido against him and his sureties, and, from the overruling of motion to set aside the judgment, they appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

L. K. Watkins, of Minden, for appellants. Ruffin *G.*Pleasant, Atty. Gen., and Thomas W. Robertson, Dist. Atty., of Minden (G. A. Gondran, of New Orleans, of counsel), for the State.

LAND, J.

Defendant was charged on information with carrying concealed weapons, and was released on an appearance bond in the sum of $150, with the usual conditions. The bond was duly forfeited at the next term of court and judgment rendered in solido against the defendant and his two sureties, who on the same day moved to set aside the judgment on the same grounds urged by them in the case of State v. Thomas Reames, 66 South. 3931 (No. 20773), this day handed down. The motion was overruled, and the sureties have appealed.

We do, not think that we have any jurisdiction of this appeal, as neither the offense nor the amount in dispute are within our jurisdiction. In misdemeanor cases our jurisdiction is determined by the punishment actually imposed and not by punishment which may or may not be imposed. See Const. 1913, art. 85.

As the appeal is Of a quasi criminal character, the Court of Appeals is without jurisdiction in the premises, and hence the appeal cannot be transferred to that court.

Appeal dismissed.

1

Ante, p. *48.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-29-1996
<CASH>                                         225,123
<SECURITIES>                                   255,840
<RECEIVABLES>                                  378,963
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    412,086
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,308,706
<PP&E>                                         254,119
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,623,531
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          456,609
<BONDS>                                        389,718
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       414,495
<OTHER-SE>                                     771,155
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,623,531
<SALES>                                        807,725
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               807,725
<CGS>                                          721,577
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  721,577
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                37,862
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,811
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 47,688
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,213
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             31,475
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    31,475
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .58
        

</TABLE>