alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 6, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00209

- CV

SCHERTZ BANCSHARES CORPORATION , Individually and d/b/a Schertz Bank & Trust, Schertz Bank & Trust, and Mustan g Valley Estates Homeowners Association

, Appellant s

v.

Scott BURRIS , Ashley Burris, Wayne Burris, Lee Burris, Kenneth Davis, Cece Davis, Amy Wilson, Mike Wilson, Daryl Green, Cathy Green, Ken Helgren, Michele Helgren, Robert Hudson, Cliff Jackson, Mamie Jackson, William Merrill, Tonya Spells, Quinton Perry, Angie Perry, Kenneth Shields, Tamara Shields, Latoya Siples, Clinton Siples, And Michelle Siples, Appellee s

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12

- 1512

- CV Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Pursuant to section 51.014(d) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code and Rule

28.3 of the Texas R ules of Appellate Procedure, we GRANT appellants ’ petition for permission to appeal from an interlocutory order. A notice of appeal is deemed to have been filed on the date of this order and the appeal will proceed as an accelerated appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 28.3(k).

We order the Guadalupe County Distri ct Clerk and the court reporter to file , respectively, the clerk’s record and reporter’s record in this court on or before May 16, 2019

.

We order the clerk of this court to file a copy of this order with the District Clerk of Guadalupe C ounty, Texas. See id. We further order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on the trial court, the court reporter, and all counsel.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 6th day of May, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
#### § 27.6 Extensions of time.

The Director may extend, for extenuating circumstances, any of the time limits provided in these regulations relating to proceedings before him and to requests for review by the Deputy Attorney General.
### §667g. Requisition of surplus grain; prevention of starvation of resident game birds and other resident wildlife; utilization by State agencies; reimbursement for packaging and transporting

For the purpose of meeting emergency situations caused by adverse weather conditions or other factors destructive of important wildlife resources, the States are authorized, upon the request of the State fish and game authority or other State agency having similar authority and a finding by the Secretary of the Interior that any area of the United States is threatened with serious damage or loss to resident game birds and other resident wildlife from starvation, to requisition from the Commodity Credit Corporation grain acquired by the Corporation through price support operations. Such grain may thereafter be furnished to the particular State for direct and sole utilization by the appropriate State agencies for purposes of sections 667g to 667g–2 of this title in such quantities as mutually agreed upon by the State and the Commodity Credit Corporation and subject to such regulations as may be considered desirable by the Corporation. The Corporation shall be reimbursed by the particular State in each instance for the expense of the Corporation in packaging and transporting such grain for purposes of sections 667g to 667g–2 of this title.

(Pub. L. 87–152, §1, Aug. 17, 1961, 75 Stat. 389.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 447 of Title 7, Agriculture, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PERKUMPULAN INVESTOR CRISIS CENTER DRESSEL - WBG, Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. DANNY MK WONG, also known as Wong Man Kee; et al., Defendants - Appellees. No. 09-36059 D.C. No. 2:09-cv-00526-JCC
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington John C. Coughenour, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted September 2, 2010 Seattle, Washington Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN and BEA, Circuit Judges.
We adopt the well-considered opinion of the district court and affirm its judgment. 

# FILED
SEP 15 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
<PAGE>
<PAGE>
                                                              Exhibit 10(g)
               GOLDEN AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
                            SURPLUS NOTE

Golden American Life Insurance Company agrees to pay First Columbine
Life Insurance Company a Colorado corporation, the sum of $35 million
($35,000,000.00) plus interest at the rate of 7.979% per annum from
the date hereof, December 8, 1999 until paid.  In any event, this
note will mature on December 7, 2029.

This Surplus Note and accrued interest thereon shall be subordinate
to payments due to policyholders, claimant and beneficiary claims, as
well as debts owed to all other classes of debtors, other than
surplus note holders, of Golden American Life Insurance Company in
the event of (a) the institution of bankruptcy, reorganization,
insolvency or liquidation proceedings by or against Golden American
Life Insurance Company, or (b) the appointment of a Trustee, receiver
or other Conservator for a substantial part of Golden American Life
Insurance Company properties.

Any payments made shall first apply to accrued interest, and the
balance of such payment shall apply to reduce the principal of this
Note.

Any payment of principal and/or interest made shall be subject to the
prior approval of the Delaware Insurance Commissioner.  If the
Commissioner has not approved payment of principal to retire the note
prior to its maturity date, the maturity date will be automatically
extended until such time as the Commissioner authorizes payment of
the final balance of principal.

Golden American Life Insurance Company hereby waives presentment and
notice of dishonor.

In witness whereof, Golden American Life Insurance Company has caused
this Note to be executed and delivered.

                              GOLDEN AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

                              By: /s/ David L. Jacobson
                                  --------------------------------
                                  David L. Jacobson, Senior Vice
                                  President and Assistant Secretary


Attest by:

/s/ Myles R. Tashman
------------------------
Myles R. Tashman
Executive Vice President and Secretary

<PAGE>
<PAGE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0245 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ZECHARIAH JUSTIN DANIEL SMITH,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 1 5 , 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 6 2023

02/06/2023
Case Number: DA 22-0245
Exhibit 32.2
Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Liska Biometry,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly  period ended September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Manoj Hippola,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  to my best
knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

By:  /s/ Manoj E. Hippola
     ---------------------------
     Manoj E. Hippola
     CFO

Dated:  November 15, 2004
§ 207.1 Eligibility. ( a ) *Filing.* Any alien who believes he or she is a refugee as defined in section 101(a)(42) of the Act, and is included in a refugee group identified in section 207(a) of the Act, may apply for admission to the United States by submitting an application, including biometric information, in accordance with the form instructions, as defined in 8 CFR 1.2.
( b ) *Firmly resettled.* Any applicant (other than an applicant for derivative refugee status under 8 CFR 207.7) who has become firmly resettled in a foreign country is not eligible for refugee status under this chapter I. A refugee is considered to be “firmly resettled” if he or she has been offered resident status, citizenship, or some other type of permanent resettlement by a country other than the United States and has traveled to and entered that country as a consequence of his or her flight from persecution. Any applicant who claims not to be firmly resettled in a foreign country must establish that the conditions of his or her residence in that country are so restrictive as to deny resettlement. In determining whether or not an applicant is firmly resettled in a foreign country, the officer reviewing the matter shall consider the conditions under which other residents of the country live: ( 1 ) Whether permanent or temporary housing is available to the refugee in the foreign country;
( 2 ) Nature of employment available to the refugee in the foreign country; and
( 3 ) Other benefits offered or denied to the refugee by the foreign country which are available to other residents, such as right to property ownership, travel documentation, education, public welfare, and citizenship.
( c ) *Immediate relatives and special immigrants.* Any applicant for refugee status who qualifies as an immediate relative or as a special immigrant shall not be processed as a refugee unless it is in the public interest. The alien shall be advised to obtain an immediate relative or special immigrant visa and shall be provided with the proper petition forms to send to any prospective petitioners. An applicant who may be eligible for classification under sections 203(a) or 203(b) of the Act, and for whom a visa number is now available, shall be advised of such eligibility but is not required to apply.
[76 FR 53782, Aug. 29, 2011]
HECO Exhibit 32.4

Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc.

Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer Furnished Pursuant
to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted by

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc. (HECO) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the HECO Report), I, Tayne S. Y. Sekimura, Chief Financial Officer of HECO, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge, that:



|(1) | The HECO Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The HECO consolidated information contained in the HECO Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition as of December 31, 2008 and results of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2008 of HECO and its subsidiaries.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Tayne S. Y. Sekimura                         
|Tayne S. Y. Sekimura                             
|Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration
|Date: February 27, 2009                          

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hawaiian Electric
Company, Inc. and will be retained by Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2010-N1v1-018-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES () explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aViation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific

requiremellts for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of

transportation?

YES () explain NO (X)
§ 924.13 Evaluation. ( a ) The HSIP evaluation process shall include: ( 1 ) A process to analyze and assess the results achieved by the program of highway safety improvement projects in terms of contributions to improved safety outcomes and the attainment of safety performance targets established as per 23 U.S.C. 150.
( 2 ) An evaluation of the SHSP as part of the regularly recurring update process to: ( i ) Confirm the validity of the emphasis areas and strategies based on analysis of current safety data; and
( ii ) Identify issues related to the SHSP's process, implementation, and progress that should be considered during each subsequent SHSP update.
( b ) The information resulting from paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall be used: ( 1 ) To update safety data used in the planning process in accordance with § 924.9;
( 2 ) For setting priorities for highway safety improvement projects;
( 3 ) For assessing the overall effectiveness of the HSIP; and
( 4 ) For reporting required by § 924.15.
( c ) The evaluation process may be financed with funds made available under 23 U.S.C. 104(b)(3) and 505, and, for metropolitan planning areas, 23 U.S.C. 104(d). The eligible use of the program funding categories listed for HSIP evaluation efforts is subject to that program's eligibility requirements and cost allocation procedures as per 2 CFR part 200.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 85805 / May 8, 2019

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-17366

In the Matter of 

CHANG-ON INTERNATIONAL, INC., and

COMPUTER GRAPHICS INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTICE THAT INITIAL DECISION HAS BECOME FINAL

The time for filing a petition for review of the initial decision in this proceeding has 

expired. No such petition has been filed by Chang-On International, Inc., or Computer Graphics 

International Inc. and the Commission has not chosen to review the decision on its own 

initiative.

Accordingly, notice is hereby given, pursuant to Rule 360(d) of the Commission's Rules 

of Practice,1that the initial decision of the administrative law judge has become the final 

decision of the Commission with respect to Chang-On International, Inc., and Computer 

Graphics International Inc.2The order contained in that decision is hereby declared final. The 

initial decision ordered that, pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 

the registrations of the registered securities of Chang-On International, Inc., and Computer 

Graphics International Inc. are revoked. The revocation is effective as of May 9, 2019.

For the Commission, by the Office of the General Counsel, pursuant to delegated 

authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

 Acting Secretary

 

1

 17 C.F.R. § 201.360(d).

2

 Capitol City Bancshares, Inc., Chang-On Int’l, Inc., Comput. Graphics Int’l Inc., John D. 

Oil and Gas Co., Legal Life Plans, Inc., and Power River Coal Corp., Initial Decision Release 

No. 1351 (Feb. 14, 2019), 2019 WL 626080. The Central Index Key numbers are: 42136 for 

Chang-On International, Inc.; and 1242513 for Computer Graphics International Inc.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 00548**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** x 

### 00548\00548_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 00548\00548_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist x 

### 00548\00548_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00548\00548_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00548\00548_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00548\00548_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00548\00548_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00548\00548_Part F.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00548\00548_Part G.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00548\00548_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 00548\Certification Statement Plant ID 00548.pdf Plant certification statement 

### 00548\Supplemental Documents\00548_Aerial Map 1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 00548\Supplemental Documents\00548_Aerial Map 2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 00548\Supplemental Documents\00548_AR-M257_20100924_091815.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 00548\Supplemental Documents\00548_AR-M257_20100924_091841.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 00548\Supplemental Documents\00548_AR-M257_20101006_215029.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 00548\Supplemental Documents\00548_AR-M257_20101007_192813.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey



### 00548\Supplemental Documents\00548_Dry Flyash2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 00548\Supplemental Documents\00548_Follow Up Questions - Resend 3.24.2011.doc Draft Questions for Follow Up 

### x 00548\Supplemental Documents\00548_Follow Up Questions.doc Draft Questions for Follow Up 

### x 00548\Supplemental Documents\00548_SPD-1 AND SPD-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 00548\Supplemental Documents\00548_Water Balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 00548\Supplemental Documents\Follow Up email 3.24.2011.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response x 00548\Supplemental Documents\Follow Up Email Second Try 3.24.2011.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response x 00548\Supplemental Documents\Plant Responses to Follow Up 3.25.2011.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 3No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
_____________________________________________________________

MCNAMEE, HOSEA, JERNIGAN, KIM, GREENAN & LYNCH, P.A.

Justin P. Fasano, Esquire (VSB # 75983)

6411 Ivy Lane, Suite 200

Greenbelt, MD 20770

Phone: 301-441-2420

jfasano@mhlawyers.com

Counsel to MLRG, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

(Alexandria Division)

)

In re: )

) Case No. 16-13634-KHK

MLRG, INC., ) Chapter 11

)

Reorganized Debtor. )

)

MOTION TO DISMISS CASE

MLRG, Inc. (“MLRG”), by and through undersigned counsel, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 

1112 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, respectfully submits this Motion for Final Decree 

(the “Motion”), requesting that this Court enter an order dismissing this case, and in support 

thereof states as follows: 

1. On October 25, 2016 (the “Petition Date”), MLRG filed with this Court a 

voluntary petition for relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. 

2. MLRG operated a restaurant known as “Ray’s the Steaks” in Arlington County, 

Virginia.

3. On September 26, 2017, MLRG filed its Debtor’s Revised Disclosure Statement 

and Plan of Reorganization [Docket No. 149] (the “Plan”).

4. The Plan was confirmed by this Court on September 26, 2017.

Case 16-13634-KHK Doc 228 Filed 07/08/19 Entered 07/08/19 17:43:18 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
2

5. MLRG was initially able to comply with the Plan, but could not continue to make 

required plan and rent payments. On June 16, 2019, MLRG closed its doors. MLRG’s landlord, 

The Navy League Building, LLC (the “Landlord”), has been granted relief from stay to take over 

MLRG’s premises.

6. All of MLRG’s assets are subject to the first priority lien of Sandy Spring Bank. 

In the event that this case was converted to Chapter 7, there would be no unencumbered assets to 

distribute. It is anticipated that Sandy Spring Bank and the Landlord will consent to the 

dismissal of this case.

7. Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1112(b)(4)(N), there is cause to dismiss this case.

WHEREFORE, MLRG respectfully requests that the Court enter an order dismissing this 

case; and grant such other and further relief as is just and appropriate under the circumstances of 

this case.

Dated: July 8, 2019 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Justin P. Fasano

McNamee, Hosea, Jernigan, Kim, Greenan & Lynch, P.A.

Justin P. Fasano, Esquire (VSB 75983)

6411 Ivy Lane, Suite 200

Greenbelt, MD 20770

Phone: 301-441-2420

jfasano@mhlawyers.com

Counsel for MLRG, Inc.

Case 16-13634-KHK Doc 228 Filed 07/08/19 Entered 07/08/19 17:43:18 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on July 8, 2019 a copy of the foregoing was filed and served via the 

Court’s Electronic Case Filing System on all parties receiving notice thereby, and by first-class 

mail, postage prepaid, to:

Office of the United States Trustee

1725 Duke Street

Alexandria, VA 22314

/s/ Justin P. Fasano

Justin P. Fasano

Case 16-13634-KHK Doc 228 Filed 07/08/19 Entered 07/08/19 17:43:18 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3
### §542a. Congressional findings

The Congress finds that the high altitude and freedom from air pollution and night luminosity caused by human activity, make the research site uniquely suited to the conduct of research probes into thunder clouds and for other atmospheric and astronomical research purposes.

(Pub. L. 96–550, title II, §202, Dec. 19, 1980, 94 Stat. 3225.)
### §542b. Administration, protection, and regulation of use

The Secretary of Agriculture shall administer, protect, and regulate use of the research site in accordance with the laws, rules, and regulations applicable to National Forest System lands, and in such manner as will best contribute to purposes of this Act.

(Pub. L. 96–550, title II, §203, Dec. 19, 1980, 94 Stat. 3225.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 96–550, Dec. 19, 1980, 94 Stat. 3221, which enacted sections 410ii to 410ii–7 and 542 to 542d of this title and enacted provisions listed in a table of Wilderness Areas set out under section 1132 of this title and provisions listed in tables of Miscellaneous National Monuments and National Monuments Established Under Presidential Proclamation set out under section 320301 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.