alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 490.605 Definitions.

The definitions in § 490.101 apply to this subpart.
### §460rrr–3. Powers of the Commission

#### (a) Hearings

The Commission may hold such hearings, meet and act at such times and places, take such testimony, and receive such evidence as the Commission considers advisable to carry out this subchapter.

#### (b) Cooperative agreements

#### (1) In general

For purposes of carrying out the management plan on non-Federal land in the Natural Area, the Commission may enter into a cooperative agreement with the State of Colorado, a political subdivision of the State, or any person.

#### (2) Requirements

A cooperative agreement entered into under paragraph (1) shall establish procedures for providing notice to the Commission of any action proposed by the State of Colorado, a political subdivision of the State, or any person that may affect the implementation of the management plan on non-Federal land in the Natural Area.

#### (3) Effect

A cooperative agreement entered into under paragraph (1) shall not enlarge or diminish any right or duty of a Federal agency under Federal law.

#### (c) Prohibition of acquisition of real property

The Commission may not acquire any real property or interest in real property.

#### (d) Implementation of management plan

#### (1) In general

The Commission shall assist the Secretary in implementing the management plan by carrying out the activities described in paragraph (2) to preserve and interpret the natural, historic, cultural, scientific, scenic, wildlife, and recreational resources of the Natural Area.

#### (2) Authorized activities

In assisting with the implementation of the management plan under paragraph (1), the Commission may—

(A) assist the State of Colorado in preserving State land and wildlife within the Natural Area;

(B) assist the State of Colorado and political subdivisions of the State in increasing public awareness of, and appreciation for, the natural, historic, scientific, scenic, wildlife, and recreational resources in the Natural Area;

(C) encourage political subdivisions of the State of Colorado to adopt and implement land use policies that are consistent with—

(i) the management of the Natural Area; and

(ii) the management plan; and

(D) encourage and assist private landowners in the Natural Area in the implementation of the management plan.

(Pub. L. 109–337, §5, Oct. 12, 2006, 120 Stat. 1778.)
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GURDEV SINGH,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-71577

Agency No. A042-967-796

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 19, 2011** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Gurdev Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board

of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing as untimely his appeal from an

immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

FILED

JAN 03 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-71577

§ 1252(a). We review de novo questions of law, Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d

785 (9th Cir. 2005), and we grant the petition for review. 

The BIA dismissed Singh’s appeal as untimely without the benefit of our

decision in Irigoyen–Briones v. Holder, 644 F.3d 943, 948 (9th Cir. 2011), which

held that the 30-day filing deadline for BIA appeals is not jurisdictional. We

therefore remand for the BIA to determine whether to consider Singh’s appeal in

light on this intervening case law. See INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16 (2002). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.
# Official Journal C 13/19 J

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 13 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4819 January 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 13

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4819 January 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 013/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2005/C 013/2 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3652 — Charterhouse/TDF) (1) | 2 |
| 2005/C 013/3 | COM documents other than legislative proposals adopted by the Commission | 3 |
| 2005/C 013/4 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3664 — Repsol Butano/Shell Gas (LPG)) (1) | 4 |
| 2005/C 013/5 | Information procedure — Technical rules (1) | 5 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 013/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2005/C 013/2

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3652 — Charterhouse/TDF) (1)

2

2005/C 013/3

COM documents other than legislative proposals adopted by the Commission

3

2005/C 013/4

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3664 — Repsol Butano/Shell Gas (LPG)) (1)

4

2005/C 013/5

Information procedure — Technical rules (1)

5

---

| | II   Preparatory Acts |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 013/6 | Legislative proposals adopted by the Commission | 12 |

II   Preparatory Acts

Commission

2005/C 013/6

Legislative proposals adopted by the Commission

12

---

| | III   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 013/7 | Call for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Structuring the European Research Area’ (1) | 15 |
| 2005/C 013/8 | ‘Training of national judges in EC competition law’ and ‘Judicial cooperation between national judges’ | 18 |

III   Notices

Commission

2005/C 013/7

Call for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Structuring the European Research Area’ (1)

15

2005/C 013/8

‘Training of national judges in EC competition law’ and ‘Judicial cooperation between national judges’

18

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 201O~NM-062-AD

Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? YES () explain NO (X) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Isthe AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have asignificant economic impact on asubstantial number ofsmall entities? YES () explain NO (X) Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation inAlaska. Isit appropriate to mclude specific requirements for aircraft operated inAlaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES () explain NO (X)
# United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit

No. 2 2

- 1 380

UNITED STATES ,
Appellee,

v.

JAYNE CARBONE ,
Defendant, Appellant

.

AMENDED ERRATA SHEET

This amended errata replaces the errata issued on A ugust 22 , 202 4

.
The opinion of this Court issued on August 1, 2024, is amended as follows:

On p age 26 , n.12, line 4 , insert a semi

- colon after "true" and before "he"

On page 28 , line 11 , replace "in" with "on"

On page 5 3 , n. 32 , line 4, replace "Brown" with "Carbone"

On page 57, line 16 , replace "Brown" with "Carbone"

On page 58, line 4 , replace "2012 through 2014" with "2010 through 2012"
### §556d. Advances of public moneys to Forest Service for fighting forest fires in emergency cases

Advances of money under any appropriation for the Forest Service may be made to the Forest Service and by authority of the Secretary of Agriculture to chiefs of field parties for fighting forest fires in emergency cases and detailed accounts arising under such advances shall be rendered through and by the Department of Agriculture to the Government Accountability Office.

(May 23, 1908, ch. 192, 35 Stat. 259; June 10, 1921, ch. 18, title III, §304, 42 Stat. 24; Pub. L. 92–310, title II, §231(v), June 6, 1972, 86 Stat. 211; Pub. L. 108–271, §8(b), July 7, 2004, 118 Stat. 814.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as a part of the Agricultural Appropriation Act for the fiscal year 1909, act May 23, 1908.

Section was formerly classified to section 534 of Title 31 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 31, Money and Finance, by Pub. L. 97–258, §1, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 877.

#### Amendments

1972—Pub. L. 92–310 struck out provisions which required chiefs of field parties to give bonds.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

"Government Accountability Office" substituted in text for "General Accounting Office" pursuant to section 8(b) of Pub. L. 108–271, set out as a note under section 702 of Title 31, Money and Finance, which redesignated the General Accounting Office and any references thereto as the Government Accountability Office. Previously, "General Accounting Office" substituted in text for "Treasury Department" pursuant to act June 10, 1921, which transferred all powers and duties conferred upon Comptroller, six auditors, and certain other officers of the Treasury to General Accounting Office. See section 701 et seq. of Title 31.
Panelist Bio for the October 28, 2021 Asset Management Advisory Committee Meeting

Mr. Jody Bhagat, Personetics

Jody has a unique combination of experiences in financial services: digital leadership roles at

leading North American Banks, Partner with McKinsey, and President of Americas at an 

innovative AI-driven fintech. He has led digital and direct teams at U.S. Bank and Citizens 

Bank, earning awards such as #1 digital experience. At McKinsey, he helped financial 

institutions in North and South America define and execute digital transformation programs 

to drive customer growth. He currently operates as President of Americas at Personetics, a 

global leader in data driven personalization and customer engagement for Financial 

Institutions. Personetics delivers personalized insights, advice, and automated programs to 

customers based on their banking and wealth transaction data. Jody has an MBA from 

Northwestern University where he was an Austin Scholar, and a B.S. in Computer 

Engineering from The University of Michigan.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A0268. The State v. Dannie Albert Mondor.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment in this matter is VACATED and this

case is TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court of Georgia. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

September 18, 2018

09/18/2018
EX-32                  SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF PAUL EGAN AND CIARAN EGAN

                          SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the quarterly report of FreeStar Technology
Corporation ("Registrant") on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended
December 31, 2001 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
("Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates
indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that to their
knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant.


Dated: March 25, 2004                  By: /s/  Paul Egan
                                       Paul Egan, President


Dated: March 25, 2004                  By: /s/  Ciaran Egan
                                       Ciaran Egan, Chief Financial Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 30, 2014

NO. 03-14-00272-CR

Michael Wade Parrett, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 277TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND ROSE

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the 2006 judgment entered by the district court. Having reviewed the 

record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court 

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay 

costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

PHILLIP L. AUSTIN, JR., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3086 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed December 21, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Mark Kiser, Judge. Phillip L. Austin, Jr., pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Michael Schaub, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
SILBERMAN, KELLY, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
§ 68.49 Closing the record. ( a ) When there is a hearing, the record shall be closed at the conclusion of the hearing unless the Administrative Law Judge directs otherwise.
( b ) If any party waives a hearing, the record shall be closed on the date set by the Administrative Law Judge as the final date for the receipt of submissions of the parties to the matter.
( c ) Once the record is closed, no additional evidence shall be accepted into the record except upon a showing that new and material evidence has become available which was not readily available prior to the closing of the record. However, the Administrative Law Judge shall make part of the record any motions for attorney's fees authorized by statutes, and any supporting documentation, any determinations thereon, and any approved correction to the transcript.
[54 FR 48596, Nov. 24, 1989. Redesignated by Order No. 1534-91, 56 FR 50053, Oct. 3, 1991]
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Realty Investors, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with
Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officers hereby certify, to the best of our knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                                                                                                                               
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 15, 2004 |  | /s/ J. C. Lowenberg, III                                                                                                                      
|                        |  | J. C. Lowenberg, III Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Acting Principal Executive Officer)
|                        | 
|                        |  | /s/ Scott T. Lewis                                                                                                                            
|                        |  | Scott T. Lewis Vice President and Chief Accounting
Officer                                                                                    



45
نصيحة لآلباء بخصوص التحدث إلى أطفالهم عن األنفلونزا

ركز على ما يستطيع طفلك فعله لمحاربة األنفلونزا وعدم نقل العدوى إلى اآلخرين:

احرص على تلقي طفلك للتطعيم، فبالرغم من 

أن وخزة التطعيم قد تكون مؤلمة، إال أنها سوف 

تحميهم من شدة المرض الحقا. كما أن لقاح 

األنفلونزا الذي يعطى كرذاذ لألنف قد يكون متاحا. 

شجعهم على السعال والعطس داخل المناديل الورقية 

عندما يكونوا مصابين بالمرض، وإلقاء المناديل الورقية 

في سلة المهمالت على الفور، وأن يغطوا أفواههم 

وأنوفهم بأذرعهم إذا لم تكن معهم مناديل ورقية.

شجع األطفال على محاولة البقاء بعيدا عن 

األشخاص المصابين. 

شجعهم على غسل أيديهم دائما بالماء الدافئ والصابون 

لمدة تتراوح بين 15 - 20 ثانية، وقدم لهم مثاال جيدا 

من خالل فعل ذلك بنفسك. 

شجعهم على البقاء بالمنزل وعدم الذهاب للعمل أو 

للمدرسة، وعلى البقاء بعيدا عن اآلخرين حتى تتحسن 

حالتهم.

217339/2010 CS 1

Services Human and Health of Department .S.U

Prevention and Control Disease for Centers

األنفلونزا التحدث إلى طفلك عن األنفلونزا
2

وزارة الصحة والخدمات البشرية األمريكية

مراكز السيطرة على األمراض والوقاية

األنفلونزا التحدث إلى طفلك عن األنفلونزا

للمزيد من المعلومات، اتصل بمركز السيطرة على المرض على الرقم (232-4636) INFO-CDC1-800-

أو طالع الموقع االلكتروني التالي flu/gov.cdc.www.

شجع األطفال على العادات الصحية: تناول الطعام الصحي والحصول على قدر كاف من النوم وممارسة الرياضة. 

استخدم أسئلتهم كفرصة إلخبارهم بكيفية تجنب األنفلونزا وكيفية تجنب نشر األنفلونزا 

والجراثيم األخرى.
SPECIMEN CERTIFICATE

                            Secretary's Certificate

         The undersigned, being the secretary of Gaige Financial Group, Inc.
hereby certifies that the specimen certificate annexed hereto is a true copy of
this corporation's Common Stock shares, par value, $.001 per share.

DATED: January 14, 2000
                                            By: /s/ Shelley Goldstein
                                                --------------------------------
                                                    Shelley Goldstein, Secretary
<PAGE>

                                STATE OF FLORIDA

                                    SPECIMEN


                           GAIGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
              AUTHORIZED 10,000,000 COMMON SHARES $.001 PAR VALUE

This certifies that_______________ is the registered Holder of _____________
Shares of the Capital Stock of

                           GAIGE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
fully paid and non-assessable transferable only on the books of the Corporation
by the holder hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate
properly endorsed.

In Witness Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this Certification to be
signed by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunto
affixed this _____ day of _____________


-------------------------------              -----------------------------------
          SECRETARY                                       PRESIDENT
Case 16-32802-KLP Doc 18 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/10/16 10:22:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 7
Case 16-32802-KLP Doc 18 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/10/16 10:22:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 7
Case 16-32802-KLP Doc 18 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/10/16 10:22:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 7
Case 16-32802-KLP Doc 18 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/10/16 10:22:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 7
Case 16-32802-KLP Doc 18 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/10/16 10:22:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 7
Case 16-32802-KLP Doc 18 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/10/16 10:22:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 7
Case 16-32802-KLP Doc 18 Filed 08/09/16 Entered 08/10/16 10:22:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 7
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 2270

ADRIA CRUMP , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. SOCIAL SECURITY OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL; SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Stephanie A. Gallagher , District Judge. ( 1:19

- cv
- 00785

- SAG )

Submitted : April 14, 2020 Decided: April 16, 2020

Before WILKINSON, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Adria Crump, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Adria Crump appeals the district court’s order s dismissing her civil action aga inst the Social Security Administration for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denying
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Crump v. Soc

. Sec

. Office of Gen.
Counsel , No . 1:19

- cv
- 00785

- SAG (D. Md. Oct. 1 & Nov. 6, 2019). We deny Crump’s motion for an expedited trial. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this co urt and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 169/2006

of 31 January 2006         

derogating from Regulation (EC) No 2375/2002 as regards the issue of import licences under tranche No 1 of subquota III for common wheat of a quality other than high quality

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 12(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

By way of derogation from the first sentence of Article 3(4) of Regulation (EC) No 2375/2002, import licence applications may be lodged from Monday, 6 February 2006 for the quantities of 464 879,874 tonnes available under subquota III referred to in Article 3(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2375/2002 for the period from 1 January to 31 March 2006.

The applications shall be lodged under the terms laid down by Regulation (EC) No 2375/2002, and in particular Article 5 thereof.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 February 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 31 January 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

(2)OJ L 358, 31.12.2002, p. 88. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

(3)OJ L 2, 5.1.2006, p. 3.

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN RE: NOMINATION PETITION OF

PATRICK HENIGAN AS A CANDIDATE

THE REPUBLICAN NOMINATION FOR

OFFICE OF MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT

JUDGE NO. 32

- 1

- 28. DELAWARE

COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA

PETITION OF: PATRICK HENIGAN :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 197 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

IN RE: NOMINATION PETITION OF

PATRICK HENIGAN AS CANDIDATE FOR

THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINATION FOR

OFFICE OF MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT JUDGE, NO. 32

- 1

- 28 DELAWARE

COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA

PETITION OF: PATRICK HENIGAN :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 198 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2nd day of May, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 2
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 2