alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Kristin Riha/RTP/USEPA/US To: Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov Date: 01/13/2012 12:37 PM Subject: Opening and Reply Briefs from NRDC v. EPA

Hi Christine, Per your request, attached as references are several of the petitioners' opening and reply briefs from NRDC v. EPA. Please feel free to share these files with the Interagency Review Panel. 1. NRDC Opening Brief 2. New York and Connecticut Opening Brief 3. National Petrochemical & Refiners Association Opening Brief 4. NRDC Reply Brief 5. New York and Connecticut Reply Brief 6. National Petrochemical & Refiners Association Reply Brief Thanks, Kristin Kristin Riha US EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards State and Local Programs Group Phone: 919-541-2031 Fax: 919-541-0824

ENV_DEFENSE-#283962-v1-Ozone_Ph__2_(D_C__Cir_)___NRDC_Proof_Opening_Brief.pdf ENV_DEFENSE-#360246-v1-Ozone_Ph__2_(D_C__Cir_)___NY_CT_Revised_Opening_Brief.pdf ENV_DEFENSE-#360542-v1-Ozone_Ph__2_(D_C__Cir_)___NPRA_Revised_Opening_Brief.pdf ENV_DEFENSE-#304981-v1-Ozone_Ph__2_(D_C__Cir_)___NRDC_Reply_Brief.pdf ENV_DEFENSE-#371180-v1-Ozone_Ph__2_(D_C__Cir_)___NY_CT_Proof_Reply_Brief.pdf ENV_DEFENSE-#371183-v1-Ozone_Ph__2_(D_C__Cir_)___NPRA_Proof_Reply_Brief.pdf
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 57 (Thursday, March 24, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 16621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6949]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Ultra-Deepwater Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Ultra-Deepwater 
Advisory Committee. The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 
86 Stat. 770) requires that public notice of this meeting be announced 
in the Federal Register.

DATES: Tuesday, April 19, 2011, 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. (EDT).

ADDRESSES: IBM, 955 L'Enfant Plaza North, SW., Suite 1500, Washington, 
DC 20024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elena Melchert, U.S. Department of 
Energy, Office of Oil and Natural Gas, Washington, DC 20585. Phone: 
202-586-5600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Committee: The purpose of the Ultra-Deepwater 
Advisory Committee is to provide advice on development and 
implementation of programs related to ultra-deepwater architecture and 
technology to the Secretary of Energy and provide comments and 
recommendations and priorities for the Department of Energy Annual Plan 
per requirements of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Title IX, Subtitle 
J, Section 999D.

Tentative Agenda

10:30 a.m. Registration.
11 a.m. Welcome and Roll Call; Opening Remarks by the Committee Chair; 
Report by the Editing Subcommittee; Facilitated Discussion by the 
Members regarding Final Report; Approval of Committee Final Report.
12:45 p.m. Public Comments, if any.
1 p.m. Adjourn.

    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. The 
Designated Federal Officer and the Chairman of the Committee will lead 
the meeting for the orderly conduct of business. If you would like to 
file a written statement with the Committee, you may do so either 
before or after the meeting. If you would like to make oral statements 
regarding any of the items on the agenda, you should contact Elena 
Melchert at the address or telephone number listed above. You must make 
your request for an oral statement at least two business days prior to 
the meeting, and reasonable provisions will be made to include the 
presentation on the agenda. Public comment will follow the 3 minute 
rule.
    Minutes: Minutes will be available by writing or calling Elena 
Melchert's office at the address or phone number listed above.

    Issued at Washington, DC on March 18, 2011.
LaTanya Butler,
Acting Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-6949 Filed 3-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
#### § 190.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this regulation is to prescribe project procedures for making the incentive payments authorized by 23 U.S.C. 131(j).
### §460l–10d. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 88–578, title I, §12, as added Pub. L. 94–422, title I, §101(6), Sept. 28, 1976, 90 Stat. 1318, required review and report on the needs, problems, and opportunities associated with urban recreation in highly populated regions.
-/^'

ZJ-, JLd, JU0/J

^^^-=^^^^^--^

ARTO3-20F

Abel Acosta, Clerk
/^r-//

La^tdZL

jUfr,i GsrarZi JffU? l£f Dtfte.
y

•?•• 4^^k^^ ^

42L-J5L&

x/^-i^//
A^Uldt^U—^Ji^h^L .2

ZIML
i^.J/tM^M^^l/leM^

thy s^zda* /./?. A A

i^i^}hjJ&£Soa^-

AMs/tifa TJT'ffoktf^

///tfAiUsry&M** sA>z/mtf>^« D wrffiJ/tlfam,

j^^6M—^

ad£2^£^amd~-

$ JL0/J

£m^^_t2^^^
'RCQ-G^AMD^E--DISTRICT

zfr^f// (.m^w*

i|i||li/ii|i.h«pi|iil>ii'|li|iii.i,||ii|.iHM
ຊ່ ວຍປ້

ອງກ

ັ

ນຕ

ົ

ວທ່ ານ ແລະ ຜ

ູ

້່

ື

ອນຈາກພະຍາດໂຄວິດ 19 (COVID-19)

ປະຕິບ

ັ

ດການເວ

ັ

້ ນໄລຍະຫ່ າງທາງສ

ັ

ງຄ

ົ

ມ

ໃຫ້ຢ

ູ

່ ຫ່ າງຈາກຜູ້່

ື

ອນ 6 ຟ

ຸ

ດ (ຄວາມໄກ 2 ຊ່ ວງແຂນ).

ແລະ ໃສ່ຫນ

້ າກາກ

ໃຫ້ແນ່ ໃຈວ່ າມ

ັ

ນອ

ັ

ດດ

ັ

ງ ແລະ ປາກຂອງທ່ ານເພ

ື

່

ອຊ່ ວຍປ້ອງກ

ັນຜ

ູ

້່

ື

ອນ.

ທ

່ ານສາມາດຕ

ິ

ດເຊ

ື

້ ອໄດ້ ແລະ

່

ໍ

ບສະແດງອາການ.

CS 317927-J 10/02/2020
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Document Search 
-  Enterprise Learning Agenda 

# Enterprise Learning Agenda

## About this document and download

  Download  .pdf

**Effective**

**Owned by**

**Related Programs**    Related programs:  

##                 Variations of this document            

-         Version      FY 2023 |               Effective:      May 31, 2023 |        File size: 706KB |          Download      .pdf        for FY 2023 / May 31, 2023       
-         Version      Fiscal Years 2022-2026  |               Effective:      March 28, 2022 |        File size: 554KB |          Download      .pdf        for Fiscal Years 2022-2026  / March 28, 2022       
-         Version      Fiscal Years 2018-2022 |             File size: 482KB |          Download      .pdf        for Fiscal Years 2018-2022 /        

##                 Related documents            

-        Report          Annual Evaluation Plan
#### § 542.12 [Reserved]
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

AUDAY J. HIDMI,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-540

[December 15, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Caroline Shepherd, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502019CF006943AXXXMB.

Jonathan E. Jordan of Rier/Jordan, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alexandra A. Folley, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., WARNER and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
HECO Exhibit 23.2

[KPMG LLP letterhead]

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-111073, 333-111073-01, 333-111073-02 and 333-111073-03 on Form S-3 of Hawaiian Electric
Company, Inc., Hawaii Electric Light Company, Inc., Maui Electric Company, Limited, and HECO Capital Trust III, respectively, and in Registration Statement Nos. 333-131206, 333-131206-01 and 333-131206-02 on Form S-3 of Hawaiian Electric Company,
Inc., Hawaii Electric Light Company, Inc. and Maui Electric Company, Limited, respectively, of our reports dated February 28, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of capitalization of Hawaiian
Electric Company, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, retained earnings, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006 and
the related financial statement schedule, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006, which reports are included in the 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc.

Our reports refer to
a change in the method of accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans in 2006.



|                 
|-----------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP     
|                 
|Honolulu, Hawaii 
|February 28, 2007
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 9, 2010 

p0830 

Order 

 

September 9, 2010 

140495 & (46) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140495 

 COA: 285753 

St. Clair CC: 07-002780-FC 

DOUGLAS RICHARD RUTKOFSKE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 17, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for 

miscellaneous relief is GRANTED.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.56

                         AMENDMENT TO SERVICE AGREEMENT

         THIS AMENDMENT ("Amendment") is entered into this 30 day of August,
1996, by and between TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Seller", first party, and PIEDMONT
NATURAL GAS COMPANY, INC., a New York corporation, hereinafter referred to as
"Buyer", second party.

                                   WITNESSETH:

         WHEREAS, Seller and Buyer entered into that certain Service Agreement,
dated January 1, 1971 under Seller's Rate Schedule LG-A ("Service Agreement")
pursuant to which Seller provides liquefied natural gas storage service for
Buyer up to a total volume of 72,770 Mcf of natural gas which is Buyer's
Liquefaction Capacity Volume; and

         WHEREAS, Seller and Buyer now desire to renew and extend the primary
term of the Service Agreement.

         NOW THEREFORE, Seller and Buyer hereby agree to renew and amend the
Service Agreement as follows:

1.       Article IV of the Service agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety
         and replaced by the following:

                                   "ARTICLE IV
                                TERM OF AGREEMENT

         This agreement shall be effective as of November 1, 1971 and shall
         remain in force and effect until 8:00 a.m. Eastern Standard Time
         October 31, 2001, and thereafter until terminated by Seller or Buyer
         upon at least one hundred eighty (180) days prior written notice."

2.       As herein amended, the Service Agreement is hereby renewed in full
         force and effect pursuant to the terms thereof.

3.       This Amendment shall be effective as of the date first above written.


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be
signed by their respective officers or representatives thereunto duly
authorized.

TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE               PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS COMPANY,
CORPORATION ("Seller")                       INC. ("Buyer")

By /s/ Frank J. Ferazzi                      By /s/ Thomas E. Skains
   --------------------                         --------------------
Frank J. Ferazzi                             Title Senior Vice President
Vice President                                     ---------------------
Customer Service
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

May 10, 2021

In the Matter of

Ameritek Ventures, Inc.,

File No. 500-1

ORDER OF SUSPENSION OF

TRADING

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Ameritek Ventures, Inc.

(“ATVK1”) (CIK No. 1530185), an active Nevada corporation located in Reno, NV with a class 

of securities registered with the Commission pursuant to Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

("Exchange Act") Section 12(g) because it is delinquent in its periodic filings with the 

Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-Q for the period 

ended February 28, 2019. On November 13, 2020, the Commission’s Division of Corporation 

Finance (“Corporation Finance”) sent a delinquency letter to ATVK requesting compliance with 

its periodic filing requirements, which was delivered. As of May 4, 2021, the common stock of 

ATVK was quoted on OTC Link operated by OTC Markets Group Inc. (formerly “Pink Sheets”) 

(“OTC Link”), had eight market makers, and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of 

Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11(f)(3). 

 

1 The short form of each issuer’s name is also its stock symbol.
2

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors 

require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company. Therefore, it is 

ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the 

securities of the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on May 

11, 2021, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on May 24, 2021.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary
### §1466. Appeals relating to offshore mineral development

For any Federal administrative agency proceeding that is an appeal or review under section 319 of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1465) related to any Federal authorization for the permitting, approval, or other authorization of an energy project, the lead Federal permitting agency for the project shall, with the cooperation of Federal and State administrative agencies, maintain a consolidated record of all decisions made or actions taken by the lead agency or by another Federal or State administrative agency or officer. Such record shall be the initial record for appeals or reviews under that Act, provided that the record may be supplemented as expressly provided pursuant to section 319 of that Act.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title III, §382, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 738.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, referred to in text, is title III of Pub. L. 89–454, as added by Pub. L. 92–583, Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1280, which is classified generally to this chapter (§1451 et seq.). For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1451 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, and not as part of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 which comprises this chapter.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 42399

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff-Respondent

,

v.

JEREMY E. THREATT

,

Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 856

Filed: December 12, 2014

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS I S AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Timothy L. Hansen , District Judge.

Order denying I.C.R. 35 motion for reduction of sentence, affirmed

.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appel late Public Defender; Shawn F. Wilkerson , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney
General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Jeremy E. Threatt pled guilty to one count of rape and one count of penetration by a

for eign object . Idaho Code § § 18

- 6101, 18

- 6608 . The district court sentenced Threatt to

concurrent unified sentences of twenty

- five years with five years determinate

. Threatt filed an

Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion, which the district court denied. Threatt appeals asserting that

the district court abused its discretion by denying his Rule 35 motion

. A motion for reduction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 is essentially a plea for leniency,

addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. Knighton , 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d

23, 24 (2006); State v. Gill , 15 0 Idaho 183

, 18 6, 244 P. 3 d 1269, 1272 (Ct. App. 2010 ). In

presenting a Rule 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of

new or additional information subsequently provided to the district court in support of the2 motion. State v. Huffman , 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2007). An appeal from the

denial of a Rule 35 motion cannot be used as a vehicle to review the underlying sentence absent

the presentation of new information. Id. Becau se no new or additional information in support of

Threatt ’s Rule 35 motion was presented , the district court did not abuse its discretion . For the

foregoing reasons, the distri ct court’s order denying Threatt ’s Rule 35 motion is affirmed.
### §4413. Other agreements

The Secretary shall undertake with the appropriate officials of nations in the Western Hemisphere to establish agreements, modeled after the Plan or the Agreement, for the protection of migratory birds identified in section 2912(a)(5) of this title. When any such agreements are reached, the Secretary shall make recommendations to the appropriate Committees on legislation necessary to implement the agreements.

(Pub. L. 101–233, §16(a), Dec. 13, 1989, 103 Stat. 1977; Pub. L. 107–308, §8(a)(14), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2448.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–308 substituted "Western Hemisphere" for "western hemisphere".
<PAGE>
                                 EXHIBIT 12
                    HILTON HOTELS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           1991    1992    1993    1994    1995
                                           ----    ----    ----    ----    ----
<S>                                      <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>      <C>
Pre-tax income including
  50% owned companies                    $121.3  $156.8  $156.2  $183.6   $261.5
  Add: Interest expense from
         Wholly owned                      58.1    66.9    80.4    85.7     93.5
         50% owned                         10.8     7.3     9.5     9.5     20.8
       Distributions from less
         than 50% owned                     5.2     4.8     6.4    12.1     13.5
                                          -----   -----   -----   -----    -----
       SUB-TOTAL (A)                      195.4   235.8   252.5   290.9    389.3

  Add: Rent expense
        (interest factor)
        Wholly owned                        1.7     1.8     2.1     2.2      2.6
        50% owned                           0.6     0.9     0.8     0.8      0.9
                                          -----   -----   -----   -----    -----
        TOTAL (B)                         197.7   238.5   255.4   293.9    392.8
                                          =====   =====   =====   =====    =====

Interest expense
        Wholly owned                       58.1    66.9    80.4    85.7     93.5
        50% owned                          10.8     7.3     9.5     9.5     20.8
        Capitalized interest                5.2     4.9     2.1     8.4      3.3
                                          -----   -----   -----   -----    -----
        SUB-TOTAL (C)                      74.1    79.1    92.0   103.6    117.6

  Add: Rent expense
        (interest factor)
        Wholly owned                        1.7    1.8      2.1     2.2      2.6
        50% owned                           0.6    0.9      0.8     0.8      0.9
                                          -----  -----    -----  ------   ------
        TOTAL (D)                         $76.4  $81.8    $94.9  $106.6   $121.1
                                          =====  =====    =====  ======   ======

  RATIOS
       Interest (A/C)                       2.6    3.0      2.7     2.8      3.3
       Fixed charges (B/D)                  2.6    2.9      2.7     2.8      3.2


</TABLE>
_________________________________________________________________________ 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Before the 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 99669 / March 5, 2024 

WHISTLEBLOWER AWARD PROCEEDING 

File No. 2024- 9

_________________________________________________________________________ 

In the Matter of the Claims for an Award 

in connection with 

Redacted Redacted

Notice of Covered Action 

Redacted

ORDER DETERMINING WHISTLEBLOWER AWARD CLAIM 

Redacted

The Claims Review Staff (“CRS”) issued a Preliminary Determination recommending ***

percent ( ***that (“Claimant”) receive a whistleblower award of %) of the 

monetary sanctions collected, or to be collected, in the above-referenced Covered Action (the 

“Covered Action”), which based on current collections would result in no payment.1 Claimant 

provided written notice of Claimant’s decision not to contest the Preliminary Determination.2

The recommendation of the CRS is adopted. The record demonstrates that Claimant 

voluntarily provided original information to the Commission that caused the staff to open the 

1 The CRS also recommended the denial of the award application of one other claimant who did not contest the 

Preliminary Determination. Accordingly, the Preliminary Determination with respect to that award claim became 

the Final Order of the Commission through operation of Exchange Act Rule 21F-10(f), 17 C.F.R. § 240.21F-10(f). 

2 Claimant did not seek reconsideration of the Preliminary Determination determining that he/she did not apply for a 

related action award and therefore, the determination was deemed to be the final order of the Commission. 

1 
investigation, and that the Commission’s charges in the successful enforcement action were 

based, in part, on Claimant’s information.3

Claimant 

Redacted Redacted Redacted Redacted Redacted Redacted Redacted Redacted Redacted Redacted Redacted Redacted

participated in multiple interviews with Commission staff, testimony, and provided documents 

which among other things, identified key witnesses and assisted the staff in drafting subpoenas. 

Redacted Redacted Redacted

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Claimant shall receive an award of 

percent ( ***%) of the monetary sanctions collected or to be collected in the Covered Action. 

***

By the Commission. 

Vanessa A. Countryman 

Secretary 

3 See Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) Section 21F(b)(1), 15 U.S.C. § 78u-6(b)(1); Exchange Act 

Rule 21F-3(a), 17 C.F.R. § 240.21F-3(a). 

4 

5 

6 

Redacted Redacted Redacted

2
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

KEVAN BOYLES,

Appellant,

v.

JOSE IVAN JIMENEZ and CAROL ANN DYBDAL,

Appellees.

No. 4D22-1573

[July 13, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Renatha S. Francis, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 50-2017-CP004460-XXXX-MB and 50-2018-CA-000667-XXXX-MB.

Rosemary Cooney of Probate, Guardianship, & Trust, P.A., West Palm 

Beach, for appellant.

Peter Ticktin and Michael McCormick, Jr. of The Ticktin Law Group, 

Deerfield Beach, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.