alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §284k. References

#### (a) By Federal employees

The Secretary of the Interior, any other Federal employee, and any employee of the Foundation, with respect to any reference to the park in any map, publication, sign, notice, or other official document or communication of the Federal Government or Foundation shall refer to the park as "Wolf Trap National Park for the Performing Arts".

#### (b) Other signs and notices

Any directional or official sign or notice pertaining to the park shall refer to the park as "Wolf Trap National Park for the Performing Arts".

#### (c) Federal laws and documents

Any reference in any law (other than this subchapter), regulation, document, record, map, or other paper of the United States to "Wolf Trap Farm Park" shall be considered to be a reference to "Wolf Trap National Park for the Performing Arts".

(Pub. L. 89–671, §14, as added Pub. L. 107–219, §1(a)(3), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1330.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Applicability

Pub. L. 107–219, §1(b), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1330, provided that: "Section 14(c) of the Wolf Trap Farm Park Act [16 U.S.C. 284k(c)] (as added by subsection (a) of this section) shall not apply to this Act [enacting this section and amending former section 1e and sections 284, 284a, 284c, and 284j of this title and provisions set out as notes under section 284c of this title]."
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2282
GEORGE CHRISTIAN, SR.; LAURA CHRISTIAN, Petitioners - Appellants, versus COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 86-23453) Submitted: November 19, 1996 Decided: December 2, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Christian, Sr., Laura Christian, Appellants Pro Se. Gary R. Allen, Richard Farber, Andrea R. Tebbets, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: George Christian, Sr., and Laura Christian appeal from the tax court's order entered November 28, 1994. The Christians' notice of appeal, filed on June 15, 1995, is untimely. Section 7483 of the Internal Revenue Code provides that "[r]eview of a decision of the tax court shall be obtained by filing a notice of appeal with the Clerk of the Tax Court within 90 days after the decision of the Tax Court is entered." 26 U.S.C. § 7483 (1994); see also Fed. R. App.P. 13(a). The timely filing of a notice of appeal is jurisdictional. Davies v. Commissioner , 715 F.2d 435, 436 (9th Cir. 1983); Robert Louis Stevenson Apartments, Inc. v. Commissioner , 337 F.2d 681 (8th Cir. 1964); Vibro Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner , 312 F.2d 253,254 (2d Cir. 1963). The Christians' motions to vacate did not extend the time to appeal the tax court's decision. Although a timely motion to vacate or revise a decision under Rule 13(a) tolls the time period for noting an appeal, successive post-decision motions may not be tacked together to perpetuate the prescribed time for appeal. Okon v. Commissioner , 26 F.3d 1025, 1026-27 (10th Cir.), cert. denied , ___ U.S. ___, 115 S. Ct. 583 (1994); see Fed. R. App. P. 13(a); Tax Ct. R. 162. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. In light of this disposition, the Christians' "Motion for Summary Judgment Review of Memorandum Sur order dated 2/17/88" is hereby denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the3 materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 23-2981

___________________________

James Paul Aery,

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant,

v.

Deputy Nick Lewis, Individual & Official Capacity; Deputy Kyle Beckwith,

Individual & Official Capacity,

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees.

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota

 ____________

 Submitted: January 25, 2024

Filed: February 1, 2024

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. 

____________
PER CURIAM.

James Aery appeals the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment in this

action raising claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law. After de novo review, we

conclude that the district court did not err in granting summary judgment for

defendants as to Aery’s section 1983 claims. We also find no abuse of discretion in

the district court’s decision not to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Aery’s state

law claims. However, we modify the judgment to clarify that the dismissal of the

state law claims was without prejudice, see Franklin v. Zain, 152 F.3d 783, 786 (8th

Cir. 1998), and we affirm the judgment as modified, see 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1The Honorable Katherine M. Menendez, United States District Judge for the

District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable

John F. Docherty, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

-2-
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald Duane COLE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-4958.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 3, 2002.

Decided May 9, 2002.

Mary Lou Newberger, Federal Public Defender, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Kasey Warner, United States Attorney, Lisa A. Green, Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Donald Duane Cole appeals the district court’s order revoking his term of supervised release and sentencing him to twenty-four months’ imprisonment. Cole’s attorney has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), raising one issue but stating that, in her view, there are no meritorious grounds for appeal. Cole was informed of his opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief, but has not done so. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

Cole claims that the district court abused its discretion in imposing a twenty-four month sentence because it exceeded the recommended sentencing range of six to twelve months set out in *U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual*(“USSG”) § 7B1.4(a) (2000). We review the reasonableness of a revocation sentence for abuse of discretion. *United States v. Davis,*53 F.3d 638, 642-43 (4th Cir.1995).

Based on our review of the record, we find the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Cole to the statutory maximum sentence of twenty-four months’ imprisonment. The sentencing ranges contained in Chapter Seven of the Guidelines are “non-binding, advisory guides to district courts in supervised release revocation proceedings.” *Davis,*53 F.3d at 642; *see also United States v. Holmes,*283 F.3d 966, 2002 WL 441198, *1 (8th Cir. Mar.22, 2002).

As required by *Anders,*we have examined the entire record and find no other meritorious issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. This court requires that counsel inform her client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a *121copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
### §460bbb–10. Savings provision

#### (a) Activities on lands outside of recreation area

Nothing in this subchapter shall limit, restrict, or require specific management practices on lands outside the recreation area boundary. The fact that activities or uses outside the recreation area can be seen, heard, or otherwise perceived within the recreation area shall not, of itself, limit, restrict, or preclude such activities or uses up to the boundary of the recreation area.

#### (b) Prior rights

(1) Nothing in this subchapter shall limit, restrict, or preclude the implementation of valid timber sale contracts or other contracts or agreements executed by the Secretary before November 16, 1990.

(2) Except as specifically provided herein nothing in this subchapter shall be construed as diminishing or relinquishing any right, title, or interest of the United States in any lands, waters, or interests therein within the boundaries of the recreation area designated by this subchapter.

#### (c) Road easements

Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed as affecting the responsibilities of the State of California or any of its political subdivisions with respect to road easements, including maintenance and improvement of State Highway 199 and County Route 427.

#### (d) Rights of access

Existing rights provided by Federal law for access by private landowners across National Forest System lands shall not be affected by this subchapter.

#### (e) Entitlement moneys

Annually for the first two full fiscal years after November 16, 1990, the Secretary shall pay for use by units of local government within the recreation area an amount equal to the difference between the amounts payable for such purposes pursuant to the Act of May 23, 1908 (chapter 193; 35 Stat. 251; 16 U.S.C. 500) and the average amount paid for such purpose under such Act during the five fiscal years preceding November 16, 1990. The amount payable under this subsection shall be reduced by 10 percent annually thereafter for each succeeding fiscal year until the amount payable shall be reduced 100 percent by the end of the twelfth fiscal year after November 16, 1990. This subsection shall expire 11 years after the first payment pursuant to this subsection.

(Pub. L. 101–612, §13, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3222.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in subsecs. (a) to (d), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 101–612, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3209, which is classified principally to this subchapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 460bbb of this title and Tables.

Act of May 23, 1908 (chapter 193; 35 Stat. 251; 16 U.S.C. 500), referred to in subsec. (e), probably means act May 23, 1908, ch. 192, 35 Stat. 260, which is classified to section 500 of this title.
```

Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-QSB Quarterly Report of Liska Biometry, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

o the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

o the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

July 28, 2003

By: /s/ Lam Ko Chau
        Lam Ko Chau, President, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
        Officer
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Hercules Incorporated (the "Company") on
Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2001 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Fred G. Aanonsen,
Vice President and Controller, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Fred G. Aanonsen
-----------------------------
Fred G. Aanonsen
Vice President and Controller
December 13, 2002
# **Hercules Incorporated**

# **EXHIBIT 31.1**

# **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

## **SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Craig A. Rogerson, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1.         I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-K/A of Hercules Incorporated;

2.         Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

3.         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

Date:  March 25, 2004

/s/ Craig A. Rogerson

Craig A. Rogerson

President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Premium Financial Services & Leasing,
Inc. on Form 10- QSB/A for the period  ending June 30,  2002,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Dennis
Kluzke, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
SS 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

        (1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)    the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
               operations of the Company.

/s/ Dennis Kluzke
Chief Financial Officer

August 23, 2002
### §513. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–588, §17(a)(1), (2), Oct. 22, 1976, 90 Stat. 2961

Section, acts Mar. 1, 1911, ch. 186, §§4, 5, 36 Stat. 962; Sept. 21, 1950, ch. 966, 64 Stat. 872, provided for creation and membership of National Forest Reservation Commission.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Section 17(a)(1) of Pub. L. 94–588 provided in part that all functions of National Forest Reservation Commission are transferred to the Secretary of Agriculture.
CS316248C 11/30/2020

cdc.gov/coronavirus

PEOPLE EXPERIENCING HOMELESSNESS

6 ft

Find ways to maintain important 

connections with friends and 

family members even while 

staying physically apart

Avoid big crowds when you can.

» Sometimes this won’t be possible.

» If you need to be in a line or a group of 

people, try to keep about 6 feet of distance 

from them. 

Cover your mouth and nose with a mask 

when around other people.

» Wearing a mask is not a substitute for staying 

at least 6 feet apart from others.

Stay at least 6 feet, about two arm lengths, 

away from other people. 

» Avoid hugging and handshakes.
Stay home when you are sick,

except to get medical care.

Wash your hands often with soap 

and water for at least 20 seconds.

Cover your cough or sneeze with a tissue, 

then throw the tissue 

in the trash.

Clean and disinfect frequently 

touched objects and surfaces.

Avoid touching your eyes, nose, and mouth. 

Avoid close contact with people who are sick. 

Help prevent the spread of respiratory diseases like COVID-19.

STOP THE SPREAD OF GERMS

cdc.gov/COVID19

316251-A March 30, 2020 4:06 PM

STOP THE SPREAD OF GERMS
EXHIBIT 32.1

                              ADZONE RESEARCH, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AdZone Research, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB/A (Amendment No. for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Charles Cardona, Chief Executive Officer,  Acting Chief Financial Officer and
Director of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to AdZone Research,  Inc. and will be retained by AdZone Research, Inc.
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.

Date: July 13, 2005

/s/ Charles Cardona
----------------------
Charles Cardona, Chief Executive Officer
   and Acting Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OR EQUIVALENT

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the
Annual Report of Hitachi, Ltd. on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 (the Report) pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) for the purpose
of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Takashi Miyoshi, Executive Vice President and Executive Officer of Hitachi, Ltd., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Hitachi, Ltd.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |     |  |                                                                
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:    July 27, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ Takashi Miyoshi                                            
|                       |  |     |  | Name:         Takashi Miyoshi                                  
|                       |  |     |  | Title:           Executive Vice President and Executive Officer
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 98569 / September 27, 2023

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-17582

In the Matter of

Weatherford International PLC, f/k/a 

Weatherford International LTD., James 

Hudgins, CPA, and Darryl Kitay, CPA

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO 

ENTER AN ORDER APPROVING OR 

DISAPPROVING PLAN OF 

DISTRIBUTION

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-17628

In the Matter of

Ernst & Young LLP, Craig R. 

Fronckiewicz, CPA, and Sarah E. 

Adams, CPA

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

On November 17, 2022, pursuant to Rule 1103 of the United States Securities and 

Exchange Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans (the “Commission’s 

Rules”), 17 C.F.R.§ 201.1103, the Commission published a Notice of Proposed Plan of 

Distribution and Opportunity to Comment (“Notice”)1for the distribution of monies placed into 

a Fair Fund in the above-captioned matters. The Notice invited public comment on the proposed 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 96340 (Nov. 17, 2022).
2

plan of distribution (“Plan”) through December 19, 2022, and the Commission received public 

comments that raised various issues (the “Comments”).

Rule 1104 of the Commission’s Rules, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1104, provides in relevant part, 

“[t]he order approving or disapproving the plan should be entered within 30 days after the end of 

the final period allowed for comments on the proposed plan unless the Commission or the 

hearing officer, by written order, allows a longer period for good cause shown.”

On January 18, 2023, the Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority, issued an order 

extending the time to enter an order approving or disapproving the Plan until June 30, 2023.

2

 On 

June 29, 2023, the Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority, issued an order extending the time 

to enter an order approving or disapproving the Plan until September 29, 2023.3

The Division states additional time is needed to present its recommendation to the 

Commission regarding the Comments and the Plan, and therefore, good cause has been shown to 

enter an order extending time to approve or disapprove the Plan until November 30, 2023. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 1104 of the Commission’s Rules,4

for good cause shown, the time for entering an order approving or disapproving the Plan is 

extended to November 30, 2023.

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman 

Secretary

2

 See Order Extending Time to Enter Order Approving or Disapproving Plan of Distribution, Exchange Act Rel. 

96687 (Jan. 18, 2023).

3

 See Order Extending Time to Enter Order Approving or Disapproving Plan of Distribution, Exchange Act Rel. 

97818 (June 29, 2023).

4

 17 C.F.R. § 201.1104.