UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

Release No. 9576 / April 22, 2014

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-15847

In the Matter of 

THE REGISTRATION 

STATEMENT OF MOBILE 

VAULT, INC.

ORDER INSTITUTING 

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS,

MAKING FINDINGS, AND ISSUING 

STOP ORDER

I.

A. On July 3, 2013, Mobile Vault, Inc. (“Respondent”) filed a Form S-1 registration 

statement seeking to register the offer and sale of 3,000,000 common shares in a $30,000 public 

offering, and amended its statement on August 26, 2013, September 18, 2013, and October 21, 

2013. The registration statement has not become effective.

B. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) deems it 

appropriate and in the public interest that administrative proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted 

to determine whether a stop order should issue suspending the effectiveness of Respondent’s 

registration statement.

II.

In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer 

of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the 

purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the 

Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings 

herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over it and the subject matter of these 

proceedings, which are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order Instituting 

Administrative Proceedings, Making Findings, and Issuing Stop Order (the “Order”), as set forth 

below. 
III.

On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds that:

1. Respondent is a Florida corporation headquartered in Cameron Park, California. 

2. On July 3, 2013, Respondent filed a Form S-1 registration statement seeking to 

register the offer and sale of 3,000,000 common shares in a $30,000 public offering, 

and amended its statement on August 26, 2013, September 18, 2013, and October 

21, 2013 (together, the “Registration Statement”).

3. The Registration Statement includes untrue statements of material facts and omits 

to state material facts necessary to make the statements contained therein not 

misleading, for example:

a. The Registration Statement states that “[o]ur sole officer and director will be 

responsible for the business plan” to develop and sell mobile privacy and 

security products. The Registration Statement also states that Respondent “is 

entirely dependent on the efforts of its sole officer and director.” The 

Registration Statement further states that Respondent is “currently operating 

out of our sole director and officer’s office located at 3384 La Canada Drive, 

Suite 1, Cameron Park, CA 95682.” These disclosures are untrue and 

misleading because Respondent’s sole officer and director has not engaged in 

business activities for Respondent as represented in the Registration 

Statement.

b. The Registration Statement states that the “Board of Directors is comprised [ ] 

solely of [Respondent’s sole officer and director] who was integral to our 

business and who is involved in our day to day operations.” The Registration 

Statement also states that Respondent’s sole officer and director “currently 

devotes approximately 20-30 hours per week to our operations” and “is 

prepared to devote more time to our operations.” The Registration Statement 

further states that “[t]he functions of [an Audit Committee, a Compensation 

Committee or a Nominating Committee] are being undertaken by our sole 

director.” These disclosures are untrue and misleading because Respondent’s 

sole officer and director has not engaged in business activities for Respondent 

as represented in the Registration Statement. 

c. The Registration Statement contains a description of the background of 

Respondent’s sole officer and director and states that her “industry and 

technical expertise are critical to the success of the business.” In the 

biography section, the Registration Statement states, in part, that Respondent’s 

sole officer and director has six years of “marketing and software design and 

programming experience,” currently works at a software company, previously 
was a purchasing manager for a medical company, and earned a bachelor of 

science in computer science from a South Florida university. These 

disclosures are untrue and misleading because Respondent’s sole officer and 

director does not have any such expertise, experience, or education.

d. The Registration Statement states that Respondent’s sole officer and director 

“meets the conditions of paragraph (a)(4)(ii) of Rule 3a4-1 of the Exchange 

Act, in that she (A) primarily performs, or is intended primarily to perform at 

the end of the offering, substantial duties for or on behalf of our company, 

other than in connection with transactions in securities . . . .” These 

disclosures are untrue and misleading because Respondent’s sole officer and 

director has not performed and does not intend to perform the duties as 

represented in the Registration Statement for or on behalf of Respondent.

e. The Registration Statement states that “[t]he shares will be sold on our behalf 

by our officer” and that “[i]t is our belief [Respondent’s sole officer and 

director] had such knowledge and experience in financial and business matters 

that she was capable of evaluating the merits and risks of the investment and 

therefore did not need the protections offered their [sic] shares under 

Securities and Act of 1933 [sic], as amended. [Respondent’s sole officer and 

director] certified that she was purchasing the shares for their [sic] own 

accounts, with investment intent.” These disclosures are untrue and 

misleading because Respondent’s sole officer and director does not have the 

level of knowledge and expertise as represented in the Registration Statement, 

and made no such certification.

f. The Registration Statement states that “[p]ursuant to the requirements of the 

Securities Act, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be 

signed on its behalf by [Respondent’s sole officer and director].” The 

Registration Statement further states that “[t]he undersigned . . . certifies that . 

. . the above is a true and correct copy of The Resolution that was duly 

adopted at a meeting of the Board of Directors, which was held on this date 

August 23, 2013.” These disclosures are untrue and misleading because 

Respondent’s sole officer and director did not sign the Registration Statement 

or Resolution on behalf of Respondent, and because Respondent’s sole officer 

and director did not attend any meeting of the Board of Directors.

g. The Registration Statement claims that there was a capital contribution by 

Respondent’s sole officer and director on May 18, 2011. This disclosure is 

untrue and misleading because Respondent’s sole officer and director made no 

capital contribution.

h. The Registration Statement states that Respondent has “no plans to change our 

business activities or to combine with another business and are not aware of 
any events or circumstances that might cause us to change our plans.” This 

disclosure is untrue and misleading because Respondent is a development 

stage company with no specific business plan or purpose other than to engage 

in a merger or acquisition with an unidentified entity and, therefore, is an 

undisclosed “blank check company” as defined in Rule 419 under the 

Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”). 

i. The Registration Statement states that Respondent’s sole officer and director

“is the only ‘parent’ and ‘promoter’ of the company” and will “continue to 

control the operations of the Company” after the offering. This disclosure is 

untrue and misleading because Respondent is controlled and promoted by 

undisclosed control persons and promoters.

4. On January 14, 2014, Respondent filed a letter seeking to withdraw its Registration 

Statement. On January 23, 2014, the Commission denied the withdrawal of the 

Registration Statement. See In the Matter of Mobile Vault, Inc., Securities Act 

Release No. 9517 (Jan. 23, 2014).

IV.

In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to 

issue a stop order suspending the effectiveness of the Registration Statement, as agreed to in 

Respondent’s Offer. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, pursuant to Section 8(d) of the Securities Act, that 

the effectiveness of the Registration Statement filed by Respondent be, and hereby is, suspended.

This Order shall be served on Respondent by certified mail forthwith.

By the Commission.

Jill M. Peterson

Assistant Secretary