alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 16-11683-RGM Doc 91 Filed 11/16/16 Entered 11/17/16 10:20:26 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 9
Case 16-11683-RGM Doc 91 Filed 11/16/16 Entered 11/17/16 10:20:26 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 9
Case 16-11683-RGM Doc 91 Filed 11/16/16 Entered 11/17/16 10:20:26 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 9
Case 16-11683-RGM Doc 91 Filed 11/16/16 Entered 11/17/16 10:20:26 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 9
Case 16-11683-RGM Doc 91 Filed 11/16/16 Entered 11/17/16 10:20:26 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 9
Case 16-11683-RGM Doc 91 Filed 11/16/16 Entered 11/17/16 10:20:26 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 9
Case 16-11683-RGM Doc 91 Filed 11/16/16 Entered 11/17/16 10:20:26 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 9
Case 16-11683-RGM Doc 91 Filed 11/16/16 Entered 11/17/16 10:20:26 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 9
Case 16-11683-RGM Doc 91 Filed 11/16/16 Entered 11/17/16 10:20:26 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 9
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ignacio Rosas, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 684]

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Angiolillo, J.), rendered April 11, 2005, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, upon his admission, and imposing sentences of imprisonment upon his previous convictions of criminal contempt in the first degree and attempted arson in the fifth degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he voluntarily failed to appear for resentencing following the revocation of his probation, despite having been warned of the consequences of his failure to reappear in accordance with the standards enunciated in *People v Parker*(57 NY2d 136 [1982]). Accordingly, the court properly sentenced him in absentia upon his violation of probation *(see People v James,*19 AD3d 615 [2005]; *People v Torra,*8 AD3d 751 [2004]; *People v Thompson,*186 AD2d 294 [1992]; *People v Salazar,*151 AD2d 517, 518 [1989]).

The defendant’s valid waiver of the right to appeal precludes review of his claim that the sentences imposed upon his violation of probation were excessive *(see People v Kimbrough,*25 AD3d 810, 810-811 [2006]; *People v Ward,*25 AD3d 727 [2006]; *People v Walker,*23 AD3d 588, 589 [2005]; *People v Gorovoy,*309 AD2d 764 [2003]). Crane, J.P., Krausman, Spolzino and Skelos, JJ., concur.
# C_2013164EN.01000301.xml

| 8.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 164/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 April 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank te Antwerpen — Belgium) — Anton Las v PSA Antwerp NV

(Case C-202/11) (1)

1

(Freedom of movement for workers - Article 45 TFEU - Company established in the Dutch-speaking region of the Kingdom of Belgium - Obligation to draft employment contracts in Dutch - Cross-border employment contract - Restriction - Disproportionate)

2013/C 164/04

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Arbeidsrechtbank te Antwerpen

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Anton Las

Applicant:

Defendant: PSA Antwerp NV

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Arbeidsrechtbank te Antwerpen — Interpretation of Art. 39 EC (now Art. 45 TFEU) — Belgian regional legislation imposing an obligation on an undertaking established in the Dutch language region to draft, on pain of nullity, all documents relating to an employment relationship with an international character in Dutch

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 45 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a federated entity of a Member State, such as that in issue in the main proceedings, which requires all employers whose established place of business is located in that entity’s territory to draft cross-border employment contracts exclusively in the official language of that federated entity, failing which the contracts are to be declared null and void by the national courts of their own motion.

---

(1)  OJ C 219, 23.7.2011.

1

---
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Before the 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 98736 / October 13, 2023 

WHISTLEBLOWER AWARD PROCEEDING 

File No. 2024-1 

In the Matter of the Claim for an Award 

in connection with 

Notice of Covered Action 

Redacted Redacted Redacted

ORDER DETERMINING WHISTLEBLOWER AWARD CLAIM 

The Claims Review Staff (“CRS”) issued a Preliminary Determination recommending that 

Redacted

(“Claimant”) receive a whistleblower award of more than $400,000 which 

represents 

Redacted

percent ( ***%) of the monetary sanctions collected, or to be collected, in 

the above-referenced Covered Action (the “Covered Action”). Claimant provided written notice 

of Claimant’s decision not to contest the Preliminary Determination. 

The recommendation of the CRS is adopted. The record demonstrates that Claimant 

voluntarily provided original information to the Commission that led to the successful 

enforcement of the Covered Action.1

In determining the amount of award for Claimant, the Commission considered the 

following factors set forth in Rule 21F-6 of the Exchange Act as they apply to the facts and 

circumstances of Claimant’s application: (i) the significance of information provided to the 

Commission; (ii) the assistance provided in the Covered Action; (iii) the law enforcement interest in 

deterring violations by granting awards; (iv) participation in internal compliance systems; 

(v) culpability; (vi) unreasonable reporting delay; and (vii) interference with internal compliance

1 See Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) Section 21F(b)(1), 15 U.S.C. § 78u-6(b)(1); Exchange Act 

Rule 21F-3(a), 17 C.F.R. § 240.21F-3(a). 

1 
 

 

 

 

and reporting systems.2 In setting the award percentage at 

Redacted

percent ( 

***

%), the 

Commission considered that Claimant alerted Commission staff to the conduct, prompting the 

opening of the investigation, and thereafter provided significant additional information and 

assistance during the course of the investigation, including communicating with Commission staff 

multiple times and providing helpful documents. The Commission also considered, however, that 

Claimant had some involvement in two of the transactions that were charged by the Commission in 

the Covered Action. 

 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Claimant shall receive an award of 

Redacted

percent ( ***%) of the monetary sanctions collected or to be collected in the Covered Action. 

By the Commission. 

Vanessa A. Countryman 

Secretary 

2 Because the negative factor of culpability is present, the 30% presumption under Rule 21F-6(c) does not apply here. 

2
### §§125, 126. Repealed. June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §39, 62 Stat. 992, eff. Sept. 1, 1948

Section 125, act Aug. 21, 1916, ch. 368, §2, 39 Stat. 522, related to inclusion of park in judicial district. See section 117 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

Section 126, act Aug. 21, 1916, ch. 368, §3, 39 Stat. 522, related to offenses. See section 13 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.
### §577e. Approval by National Forest Reservation Commission for acquisition of additional lands

Lands shall be acquired by purchase or condemnation under the supplemental authority granted in section 577c of this title only with prior approval of the National Forest Reservation Commission created by section 4 of the Act approved March 1, 1911, as amended, and lands so acquired shall become parts of the Superior National Forest and be subject to the provisions of said Act, as amended, and of such other laws as apply to land acquired under the provisions of said Act, as amended, except as hereinafter provided.

(June 22, 1948, ch. 593, §3, 62 Stat. 570.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The National Forest Reservation Commission, referred to in text, was created by section 4 of act Mar. 1, 1911 (16 U.S.C. 513). Section 4 of the 1911 Act was repealed, and all functions of the National Forest Reservation Commission were transferred to the Secretary of Agriculture, by section 17(a)(1) of Pub. L. 94–588, Oct. 22, 1976, 90 Stat. 2961.

Said Act, referred to in text, means act Mar. 1, 1911, ch. 186, 36 Stat. 961, popularly known as the Weeks Law, which enacted former sections 513 and 514 and sections 515 to 519, 521, 552, and 563 of this title and amended sections 480 and 500 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 552 of this title and Tables.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Hawkins, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Kfor the period ended April 2, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John R. Hawkins, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ John R. Hawkins     |   |   |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
|                    |   |   |   |   |
| John R. Hawkins         |   |   |   |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |   |   |   |
| June 16, 2006      |   |   |   |   |

 

----
# Official Journal L 73/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.073.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 73 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5418 March 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.073.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 73

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5418 March 2011

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Information on the date of entry into force of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Solomon Islands | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Information on the date of entry into force of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Solomon Islands

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
§ 79.12 Criteria for eligibility for claims relating to leukemia. To establish eligibility for compensation under this subpart, a claimant or eligible surviving beneficiary must establish each of the following: ( a ) ( 1 ) That the claimant was physically present at any place within the affected area for a period of at least one year (12 consecutive or cumulative months) during the period beginning on January 21, 1951, and ending on October 31, 1958;
( 2 ) That the claimant was physically present at any place within the affected area for the entire, continuous period beginning on June 30, 1962, and ending on July 31, 1962; or
( 3 ) That the claimant was present onsite at any time during a period of atmospheric nuclear testing and was a participant during that period in the atmospheric detonation of a nuclear device;
( b ) That after such period of physical presence or onsite participation the claimant contracted leukemia;
( c ) That the claimant's initial exposure occurred prior to age 21; and
( d ) That the onset of the leukemia occurred more than two years after the date of the claimant's first exposure to fallout.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****The BLM : asound investment for America.**** 
SuDocNumber:I53.2:IN 8/7/
ItemNumber:0631(online)
CGPsystem Number:000925924
 
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016| 2017 | 2018 | 2019
 
 
 **
KPMG LLP
4200 Wells Fargo Center
90 South Seventh Street
Minneapolis, MN  55402


                          Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors of Allianz Life  Insurance  Company of North  America and
Contract Owners of Allianz Life Variable Account B:

We  consent  to the use of our  report  dated  March 19,  2004 on the  financial
statements of Allianz Life  Variable  Account B and our report dated January 19,
2004, on the consolidated financial statements of Allianz Life Insurance Company
of North America and  subsidiaries  included  herein and to the reference to our
Firm under the heading "EXPERTS".

Our report dated Januray 19, 2004 on the  consolidated  financial  statements of
Allianz Life  Insurance  Company of North America and  subsidiaries  refers to a
change in the method of accounting  for  derivative  instruments in 2001 and its
method of accounting for goodwill in 2002.

                                          /s/ KPMG LLP
                                          KPMG LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
April 26,2004
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-90,018-01

EX PARTE RENEE BURTON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1330037-A IN THE 179 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of injury to an

elderly person and sentenced to twenty-seven years’ imprisonment. She did not appeal her

conviction.

Applicant contends that her trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by telling her she

could not appeal, by advising her that if she pleaded open to the court, she would receive a sentence

of twenty-five years or less, by failing to investigate the case, and by coercing her into pleading

guilty without a punishment recommendation. 
2

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle her to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The

trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the

performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient

performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and

conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for

habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: July 24, 2019

Do not publish
"demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted"). We therefore

deny the writ petition. See NRAP 21(b)(1); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (recognizing that the decision to issue writ relief is within this court's discretion).

It is so ORDERED.'

cc: Michael James Betts Attorney General/Carson City Lincoln County Clerk

"We direct the clerk of this court to file petitioner's motion to extend the prison copywork limit, provisionally received in this court on August 7, 2013. Having considered the motion, in light of this order, we deny it as moot.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 2
### §8541. Environmental Information Services Working Group

#### (a) Establishment

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Science Advisory Board shall continue to maintain a standing working group named the Environmental Information Services Working Group (in this section referred to as the "Working Group")—

(1) to provide advice for prioritizing weather research initiatives at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to produce real improvement in weather forecasting;

(2) to provide advice on existing or emerging technologies or techniques that can be found in private industry or the research community that could be incorporated into forecasting at the National Weather Service to improve forecasting skill;

(3) to identify opportunities to improve—

(A) communications between weather forecasters, Federal, State, local, tribal, and other emergency management personnel, and the public; and

(B) communications and partnerships among the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the private and academic sectors; and

(4) to address such other matters as the Science Advisory Board requests of the Working Group.

#### (b) Composition

#### (1) In general

The Working Group shall be composed of leading experts and innovators from all relevant fields of science and engineering including atmospheric chemistry, atmospheric physics, meteorology, hydrology, social science, risk communications, electrical engineering, and computer sciences. In carrying out this section, the Working Group may organize into subpanels.

#### (2) Number

The Working Group shall be composed of no fewer than 15 members. Nominees for the Working Group may be forwarded by the Working Group for approval by the Science Advisory Board. Members of the Working Group may choose a chair (or co-chairs) from among their number with approval by the Science Advisory Board.

#### (c) Annual report

Not less frequently than once each year, the Working Group shall transmit to the Science Advisory Board for submission to the Under Secretary a report on progress made by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in adopting the Working Group's recommendations. The Science Advisory Board shall transmit this report to the Under Secretary. Within 30 days of receipt of such report, the Under Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives a copy of such report.

(Pub. L. 115–25, title IV, §401, Apr. 18, 2017, 131 Stat. 105.)
# MINI-RELAXATION EXERCISES:  A QUICK FIX IN STRESSFUL MOMENTS 

Mini-relaxations are stress busters you can reach for any time.  These techniques can ease your fear at the dentist’s office, thwart stress before an important meeting, calm you when stuck in traffic, or help you keep your cool when faced with people or situations that irritate you.  Whether you have one minute or three, these exercises work.

## When you’ve got 1 minute

Place your hand just beneath your navel so you can feel the gentle rise and fall of your belly as you breathe.  Breathe in.  Pause for a count of three.  Breathe out.  Pause for a count of three.  Continue to breathe deeply for one minute, pausing for a count of three after each inhalation and exhalation.

Or alternatively, while sitting comfortably, take a few slow deep breaths and quietly repeat to yourself “I am” as you breathe in and “at peace” as you breathe out.  Repeat slowly two or three times.  Then feel your entire body relax into the support of your chair.

## When you’ve got 2 minutes

Count down slowly from 10 to 0.  With each number, take one complete breath, inhaling and exhaling.  For example, breathe in deeply, saying “10” to yourself.  Breathe out slowly.  On your next breath, say “nine,” and so on.  If you feel lightheaded, count down more slowly to space your breaths further apart.  When you reach zero, you should feel more relaxed. If not, go through the exercise again.

## When you’ve got 3 minutes

While sitting, take a break from whatever you’re doing and check your body for tension.  Relax your facial muscles and allow your jaw to open slightly.  Let your shoulders drop.  Let your arms fall to your sides.  Allow your hands to loosen so there are spaces between your fingers.  Uncross your legs or ankles.  Feel your thighs sink into your chair, letting your legs fall comfortably apart.  Feel your shins and calves become heavier and your feet grow roots into the floor.  Now breathe in slowly and breathe out slowly.

For more relaxation techniques and other solutions to control stress, check out the Special Health Report from Harvard Medical School, *Stress Management:  Approaches for preventing and reducing stress* at http://www.health.harvard.edu/special_health_reports/stress-management-approaches-for-preventing-and-reducing-stress?utm_source=HEALTHbeat&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=HB111012.  

DRAFT		Page 1 of 1
### §542. Langmuir Research Site; establishment

That in order to encourage scientific research into atmospheric processes and astronomical phenomena, and to preserve conditions necessary for that research, there is hereby established the Langmuir Research Site (hereinafter referred to as the "research site") in the Cibola National Forest in the State of New Mexico.

(Pub. L. 96–550, title II, §201, Dec. 19, 1980, 94 Stat. 3225.)