alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3843. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–79, title II, §2710(a), Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 770

Section, Pub. L. 99–198, title XII, §1243, as added Pub. L. 104–127, title III, §341, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1008; amended Pub. L. 107–171, title II, §§2003, 2006(d), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 233, 237; Pub. L. 110–234, title II, §2707, May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1077; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title II, §2707, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1805, related to cooperative conservation partnership initiative.

A prior section 3843, Pub. L. 99–198, title XII, §1243, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1515; Pub. L. 101–624, title XIV, §1442, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3602, which related to administration of this chapter, was omitted in the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 104–127.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeal; Transitional Provisions

Pub. L. 113–79, title II, §2710, Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 770, provided that:

"(a) Repeal.—Except as provided in subsection (b), section 1243 of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3843) is repealed.

"(b) Transitional Provisions.—

"(1) Effect on existing contracts and agreements.—The amendment made by this section [repealing section 3843 of this title] shall not affect the validity or terms of any contract or agreement entered into by the Secretary of Agriculture under section 1243 of the Food Security Act of 1985 ([former] 16 U.S.C. 3843) before the date of enactment of the Agricultural Act of 2014 [Feb. 7, 2014], or any payments required to be made in connection with the contract or agreement.

"(2) Funding.—

"(A) Use of prior year funds.—Notwithstanding the repeal of section 1243 of the Food Security Act of 1985 ([former] 16 U.S.C. 3843), any funds made available from the Commodity Credit Corporation to carry out the cooperative conservation partnership initiative under that section for fiscal years 2009 through 2013 shall be made available to carry out contracts and agreements referred to in paragraph (1) that were entered into prior to the date of enactment of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (including the provision of technical assistance).

"(B) Other.—On exhaustion of funds made available under subparagraph (A), the Secretary [of Agriculture] may use funds made available to carry out the regional conservation partnership program under subtitle I of title XII of the Food Security Act of 1985 [16 U.S.C. 3871 et seq.], as added by section 2401, to continue to carry out contracts and agreements referred to in paragraph (1) using the provisions of law and regulation applicable to such contracts and agreements as in existence on the day before the date of enactment of the Agricultural Act of 2014."
Editorial Note on Part 1274a
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1274a appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and 68 FR 10359, Mar. 5, 2003.

§ 1274a.9 Enforcement procedures. ( a ) - ( d ) [Reserved]
( e ) *Request for Hearing Before an Administrative Law Judge.* If a respondent contests the issuance of a Notice of Intent to Fine, the respondent must file with the DHS, within thirty days of the service of the Notice of Intent to Fine, a written request for a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge. Any written request for a hearing submitted in a foreign language must be accompanied by an English language translation. A request for a hearing is not deemed to be filed until received by the DHS office designated in the Notice of Intent to Fine. In computing the thirty day period prescribed by this section, the day of service of the Notice of Intent to Fine shall not be included. If the Notice of Intent to Fine was served by ordinary mail, five days shall be added to the prescribed thirty day period. In the request for a hearing, the respondent may, but is not required to, respond to each allegation listed in the Notice of Intent to Fine.
( f ) *Failure to file a request for a hearing.* If the respondent does not file a request for a hearing in writing within thirty days of the date of service of a Notice of Intent to Fine (thirty-five days if served by ordinary mail), the final order issued by DHS shall not be subject to a hearing before an administrative law judge under 28 CFR part 68.
[52 FR 16221, May 1, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 8613, Mar. 16, 1988; 55 FR 25935, June 25, 1990; 56 FR 41786, Aug. 23, 1991; 61 FR 52236, Oct. 7, 1996; 74 FR 2340, Jan. 15, 2009]
### §577g–1. Payment to State of Minnesota for extension to other sections of land

The Secretary of the Treasury, upon the certification of the Secretary of Agriculture, shall pay to the State of Minnesota, at the close of each fiscal year from any national-forest receipts not otherwise appropriated a sum of money equivalent to three-quarters of 1 per centum of the fair appraised value of such national-forest lands as may be situated within the area described in section 577d–1 of this title at the end of each fiscal year; and the payments made hereunder shall be distributed to each of the three aforesaid counties in conformity with the fair appraised value of such national-forest lands in each county: Provided, That the fair appraised value of the lands shall be determined by the Secretary of Agriculture at ten-year intervals and his determination shall be conclusive and final: Provided further, That the first payment to the State of Minnesota under the provisions of this section shall be due at the close of the fiscal year 1959: And provided further, That the provisions of section 500 of this title, shall not be applicable to the national-forest lands to which this section applies.

(June 22, 1948, ch. 593, §5, 62 Stat. 570; June 22, 1956, ch. 425, §2, 70 Stat. 328.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 5 of act June 22, 1948, as it read prior to amendment by act June 22, 1956, is set out as section 577g of this title.

#### Amendments

1956—Act June 22, 1956, amended section with respect to the lands described in section 577d–1 by revising the proviso to fix the due date of the first payment to Minnesota as of the close of the fiscal year 1959. For payment for lands described in section 577d, see section 577g of this title.
### §473. Revocation, modification, or vacation of orders or proclamations establishing national forests

The President of the United States is authorized and empowered to revoke, modify, or suspend any and all Executive orders and proclamations or any part thereof issued under section 471 1 of this title, from time to time as he shall deem best for the public interests. By such modification he may reduce the area or change the boundary lines or may vacate altogether any order creating a national forest.

(June 4, 1897, ch. 2, §1, 30 Stat. 34, 36.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 471 of this title, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §704(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2792.

#### Codification

The two sentences of this section are from provisions in section 1 of the Sundry Civil Appropriation Act for the fiscal year 1898, act June 4, 1897.

The first sentence is a portion of the third paragraph and was prefaced by the words "To remove any doubt which may exist pertaining to the authority of the President thereunto." Other provisions of the same paragraph have been omitted as temporary.

The second sentence is a portion of the seventh paragraph the whole of which reads as follows: "The President is hereby authorized at any time to modify any Executive order that has been or may hereafter be made establishing any forest reserve, and by such modification may reduce the area or change the boundary lines of such reserve, or may vacate altogether any order creating such reserve."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Certain provisions of act June 4, 1897, ch. 2, 30 Stat. 34, under the headings "under the department of the interior." and "surveying the public lands.", which enacted sections 473 to 478, 479 to 482, and 551 of this title, are popularly known as the Organic Administration Act.

1 See References in Text note below.
### §396. Additional lands; acceptance of title

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized, in his discretion and upon submission of evidence of satisfactory title to him, to accept, on behalf of the United States, title to the lands referred to in section 391b of this title as may be deemed by him necessary or desirable for national-park purposes.

(June 20, 1938, ch. 530, §2, 52 Stat. 784.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Hawai‘i Volcanoes National Park

Designation of portion of Hawaii National Park situated on island of Hawaii as Hawai‘i Volcanoes National Park, effective Sept. 22, 1961, see section 391d of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Hawaiian
Electric Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries' consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 1995 and consolidated statement of income for the year ended
December 31, 1995 and is qualified in its entirety by referencce to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0000354707
<NAME> HAWAIIAN ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES, INC. 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         130,833
<SECURITIES>                                 1,479,552
<RECEIVABLES>                                  145,521
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,016
<INVENTORY>                                     35,258
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       2,623,742
<DEPRECIATION>                                 815,547
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,603,745
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        758,463
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           41,750
<PREFERRED>                                     48,293
<COMMON>                                       585,387
<OTHER-SE>                                     144,216
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,603,745
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,295,924
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,105,196
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (8,429)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,064
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              62,860
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                133,233
<INCOME-TAX>                                    55,740
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             77,493
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    77,493
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.66
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 193 (Thursday, October 4, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60688-60689]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-24488]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

[Case No. RF-022]

Decision and Order Granting a Waiver to Sanyo From the Department 
of Energy Residential Refrigerator and Refrigerator-Freezer Test 
Procedures; Correction

AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of 
Energy.

ACTION: Notice of correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a decision and 
order (Case No. RF-022) in the Federal Register on August 16, 2012 (77 
FR 49443) that grants Sanyo E&E Corporation (Sanyo) a waiver from the 
DOE electric refrigerator and refrigerator-freezer test procedures for 
determining the energy consumption of residential refrigerator-freezers 
for the basic models set forth in its petition for waiver. This Notice 
of Correction includes information that was inadvertently omitted from 
the decision and order which was contained in the petition for wavier 
pertaining to a correction factor which is needed to calculate the 
energy efficiency. This information was included in the petition for 
waiver published in the Federal Register on April 2, 2012 (77 FR 
19654).

DATES: This Notice of Correction is effective October 4, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Bryan Berringer, U.S. Department of Energy, Building Technologies 
Program, Mailstop EE-2J, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 
20585-0121. Telephone: (202) 586-0371, Email: 
Bryan.Berringer@ee.doe.gov.
Ms. Elizabeth Kohl, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the General 
Counsel, Mail Stop GC-71, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 
20585-0103, (202) 586-7796, Email: Elizabeth.Kohl@hq.doe.gov.

Correction

    In FR Doc. 2012-20125 published in the Federal Register on August 
16, 2012

[[Page 60689]]

(77 FR 49443), the following correction should be made:

    Page 49444, first column, ``III. Conclusion,'' paragraph (3) is 
corrected by adding the following paragraph after the first 
paragraph in that section:

    Sanyo shall also use the K factor (correction factor) value of 0.85 
when calculating the energy consumption of one of the models listed 
above. Therefore, the energy consumption is defined by the higher of 
the two values calculated by the following two formulas (according to 
10 CFR part 430, subpart B, Appendix A1):
    Energy consumption of the wine compartment:

EWine = ET1 + [(ET2-ET1) x (55 [deg]F-TW1)/(TW2-TW1)] *0.85

    Energy consumption of the refrigerated beverage compartment:

EBeverage Compartment = ET1 + [(ET2-ET1) x (38 [deg]F-TBC1)/(TBC2-
TBC1)].

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 26, 2012.
Kathleen B. Hogan,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and 
Renewable Energy.
[FR Doc. 2012-24488 Filed 10-3-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
#### § 490.701 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to implement the requirements of 23 U.S.C. 150(c)(5)(A) to establish performance measures for State DOTs and the MPOs to use in assessing CMAQ Traffic Congestion for the purpose of carrying out the CMAQ program.
### §423e. Ascertaining and marking lines of battle

It shall be lawful for the authorities of any State having had troops engaged at Petersburg, to enter upon the lands and approaches of the Petersburg National Battlefield for the purpose of ascertaining and marking the lines of battle of troops engaged therein: Provided, That before any such lines are permanently designated, the position of the lines and the proposed methods of marking them by monuments, tablets, or otherwise, including the design and inscription for the same, shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Interior and shall first receive written approval of the Secretary, which approval shall be based upon formal written reports to be made to him in each case by the commissioners of the battlefield: Provided, That no discrimination shall be made against any State as to the manner of designating lines, but any grant made to any State by the Secretary of the Interior may be used by any other State.

(July 3, 1926, ch. 746, §6, 44 Stat. 823; Ex. Ord. No. 6166, §2, June 10, 1933; Ex. Ord. No. 6228, §1, July 28, 1933; Pub. L. 87–603, §1, Aug. 24, 1962, 76 Stat. 403.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Petersburg National Battlefield" and "battlefield" substituted in text for "Petersburg National Military Park" and "park", respectively, in view of redesignation of Petersburg National Military Park as Petersburg National Battlefield by Pub. L. 87–603. See section 423h–1 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Transfer of administrative functions of park, see note set out under section 423 of this title.
### §460lll–13. Payments to States and counties

#### (a) Payments in lieu of taxes

Land within the Recreation Area shall be subject to the provisions for payments in lieu of taxes under chapter 69 of title 31.

#### (b) Distribution

All amounts received from charges, use fees, and natural resource utilization, including timber and agricultural receipts, shall not be subject to distribution to States under section 500 of this title.

#### (c) Payments by the Tennessee Valley Authority

After the transfer of administrative jurisdiction is made under section 460lll–41 of this title—

(1) the Tennessee Valley Authority shall continue to calculate the amount of payments to be made to States and counties under section 831l of this title; and

(2) each State (including, for the purposes of this subsection, the State of Kentucky, the State of Tennessee, and any other State) that receives a payment under that section shall continue to calculate the amounts to be distributed to the State and local governments, as though the transfer had not been made.

(Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(e) [title V, §513], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–231, 2681–313.)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6381

JEFFERY E. SHORT,

Plaintiff ─ Appellant,

v.

CHARLES L. MANN, SR.; WILLIS J. FOWLER; ANDREW P. TERRELL; 

ROBERT C. LEWIS,

Defendants ─ Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (5:09-ct-03155-BO)

Submitted: June 16, 2011 Decided: June 21, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffery E. Short, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons, 

Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jeffery E. Short appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Short v. Mann, No. 5:09-ct-03155-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 16, 

2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
### §459a–5. Addition of lands; Naval Amphibious Training Station

There is transferred to the Secretary of the Interior without reimbursement or transfer of funds, administrative jurisdiction over an area of approximately twenty-one and eight-tenths acres of federally owned land, formerly designated as the Naval Amphibious Training Station, together with any improvements thereon which may exist at the time of the transfer, situated on Ocracoke Island within the village of Ocracoke, County of Hyde, in the State of North Carolina. The property so transferred shall be administered by the Department of the Interior and shall become a part of the Cape Hatteras National Seashore Recreational Area, when established.

(July 14, 1953, ch. 191, 67 Stat. 148.)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DWAYNE WRIGHT,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 562 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of April, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
NEI32636 Formaldehyde REL 22 20

Examined results for maximum off-site impact 

(Figure 1)

2

 See Appendix 7 for figures depicting off-site impacts.

Facility NEI ID

1

 Facilities with a HEM-3 screening acute value greater than 1 were refined.

Table 4a – Maximum Predicted Acute Risks Greater than 1 (Refined Approach)

Refined Modeling Approach 2 Pollutant Criteria

HEM-3

(Screening)

Refined

Results 1

Mineral Wool Production

1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 446 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 446

  Authorizing the printing of tributes and other related materials in 
               honor of the late Senator Janet Kay Hagan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 4, 2019

Ms. Klobuchar submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Authorizing the printing of tributes and other related materials in 
               honor of the late Senator Janet Kay Hagan.

    Resolved, That there be printed as a Senate document a compilation 
of tributes and other related materials concerning the Honorable Janet 
Kay Hagan, late a Senator from the State of North Carolina.
                                 <all>
```
## Pennsylvania Act 13 Issues & Concerns Gary E. Slagel Steptoe & Johnson PLLC Canonsburg, PA

## PA Act 13

• Enacted February 14, 2012 • Amends PA Act 223, The Oil and Gas Act • Contains 3 Primary Sections

– Chapter 23 – the Drilling Impact Fee

– Chapter 32 – (Well) Development

– Chapter 33 – Local Ordinances Related to Oil and Gas Operation

## PA Act 13

• Chapter 23 Drilling Impact Fee

– 15 year payment period

– Fee based on the average price of gas in the preceding 12 months period. PA PUC uses the CPI in a 4 state region

– Applied to unconventional wells only

– Vertical unconventional wells pay 20% of the full amount

– Production Threshold > 90 MCF/day

## PA Act 13

• Chapter 33 Local Ordinances

– Act 13 standards supersede all local ordinances regulating oil and gas operation except with respect to zoning and floodplain management

– Invalidated by the PA Supreme Court – December, 2013

## PA Act 13

• Chapter 32 – (Well) Development

– Well permitting

– Location restrictions

– Site restoration

– Protection of water supplies

– Well site containment

– Transportation of fluids

## PA Act 13

• Chapter 32 – (Well) Development

– Corrosion control

– Gathering lines

– Emergency response

– Well reporting

– Chemical disclosure

– Bonding

– Air emissionsChapter 78 Proposed Rulemaking
• “the proposed rulemaking will amend the current oil and gas regulations and add additional controls to the surface activities on a well site. . . . Compared to conventional oil and gas development in this Commonwealth, these recent advances involve larger well sites, larger centralized freshwater and waste storage facilities,• mobile wastewater processing facilities, larger volumes of water for hydraulic fracturing activities, new pipelines systems and increased amounts of regulated substances generated during drilling and hydraulic fracturing activities.”* *Background and Purpose – Proposed Rulemaking, Environmental Quality Board

## Chapter 78 & The Big Four

• Public Resource protection and special concern species • Waste management at well sites • Pre - hydraulic fracturing assessments for orphaned and abandoned wells • Water supply restoration standards

## Chapter 78 & Water

• Water Supply restoration – what does “exceeded” mean relative to SDWA standards? • What is a “Regulated Substance”? • Temporary storage • Nearest high groundwater table • Freshwater impoundments • Centralized impoundments

### Chapter 78 & Waste

• Disposal of drill cuttings • What is a “Regulated Substance”? • Disposal of residual waste