15290 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 54 / Monday, March 21, 2011 / Notices 

position. For the two-year period for which 

data were analyzed, five establishments had 

seven, seven, nine, nine, and 10 positive 

results (the same five establishments with the 

largest number of positive results identified 

above). Of these, three establishments had a 

second full set of 56 samples, with a total 

number of six positive results (one, two, and 

three), for a rate of 3.6 percent, still above 

average. These three establishments though 

would have met the standard and thus would 

have been taken off the list. If the proposed 

grace period option were operating, then it 

would have been invoked if there had been 

six positive results instead of seven for one 

of the sets; in such a case, any of results from 

the second sets given above would have 

resulted in the establishment not meeting the 

standard, and the establishment’s name 

would have been listed. Under FSIS’ system, 

in this case the establishments would have 

been listed after the first set when there was 

sufficient evidence for adducing that the 

establishments’ processes were not as good as 

could be relative to the rest of the industry, 

and then removed after the second set 

success, when the latest evidence would not 

be sufficient for such an adduction. 

In conclusion, FSIS believes that its system 

prevents type 1 errors from occurring often 

and is timelier regarding when poor 

performing establishments would be listed. 

FSIS believes that its policy is appropriate for 

maintaining the status quo, and inducing 

poorer performing establishments to improve 

their processes to a level consistent with the 

industry’s overall performance. By relaxing 

the required degree of confidence to 99 

percent from 80 percent confidence, FSIS 

believes that it has provided a reasonable 

policy with regard to small deviations from 

the standard for which the establishment 

could and should address without being 

listed. For the compliance guideline for the 

turkey performance standard, the actual 

degree of confidence is 99.7 percent. As a 

consequence, FSIS does not believe a ‘‘grace 

period’’ is necessary; that if an establishment 

fails to meet the standard compliance 

criterion it would indicate that the 

establishment’s process can be improved. In 

addition, (1) The discrepancy between the 

baseline and HACCP percentages of positive 

results can be ‘‘explained’’ for the most part 

by the disproportional distribution of 

samples over time and over establishments; 

(2) HACCP verification data show that over 

90 percent of the sets in the time period 

analyzed had no more than three positive 

results, and thus for the most part it seems 

that establishments have been performing 

recently at or better than the specified 

performance standard. 

[FR Doc. 2011–6585 Filed 3–18–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Forest Service 

Sanders County Resource Advisory 

Committee Meeting 

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. 

ACTION: Notice of Sanders County 

Resource Advisory Committee Meeting. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in 

the Federal Advisory Committee Act 

(Pub. L. 92–463) and under the Secure 

Rural Schools and Community SelfDetermination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106– 

393) the Lolo and Kootenai National 

Forests’ Sanders County Resource 

Advisory Committee will meet on April 

21, 2011 at 7 p.m. in Thompson Falls, 

Montana for a business meeting. The 

meeting is open to the public. 

DATES: April 21, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at 

the Thompson Falls Courthouse, 1111 

Main Street, Thompson Falls, MT 

59873. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Randy Hojem, Designated Federal 

Official (DFO), District Ranger, Plains 

Ranger District, Lolo National Forest at 

(406) 826–3821. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda 

topics include solicitation for new RAC 

project proposals, reviewing progress on 

current projects, and receiving public 

comment. If the meeting location is 

changed, notice will be posted in the 

local newspapers, including the Clark 

Fork Valley Press, and Sanders County 

Ledger. 

Dated: March 14, 2011. 

Randy R. Hojem, 

District Ranger. 

[FR Doc. 2011–6503 Filed 3–18–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–11–P 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Forest Service 

[0209IDP30910] 

Upper Rio Grande Resource Advisory 

Committee 

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. 

ACTION: Notice of meeting. 

SUMMARY: The Upper Rio Grande 

Resource Advisory Committee will meet 

in Monte Vista, Colorado. The 

committee is meeting as authorized 

under the Secure Rural Schools and 

Community Self-Determination Act 

(Pub. L. 110–343) and in compliance 

with the Federal Advisory Committee 

Act. The purpose is to review and 

recommend project proposals to be 

funded with Title II money. 

DATES: The meeting will be held on 

April 11, 2011 and will begin at 10 a.m. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at 

the South Fork Community Building, 

0254 Highway 149, South Fork, 

Colorado. Written comments should be 

sent to Mike Blakeman, San Luis Valley 

Public Lands Center, 1803 West U.S. 

Highway 160, Monte Vista, CO 81144. 

Comments may also be sent via e-mail 

to mblakeman@fs.fed.us, or via 

facsimile to 719–852–6250. 

All comments, including names and 

addresses when provided, are placed in 

the record and are available for public 

inspection and copying. The public may 

inspect comments received at the San 

Luis Valley Public Lands Center, 1803 

West U.S. Highway 160, Monte Vista, 

CO 81144. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mike Blakeman, RAC coordinator, 

USDA, San Luis Valley Public Lands 

Center, 1803 West U.S. Highway 160, 

Monte Vista, CO 81144; 719–852–6212; 

E-mail mblakeman@fs.fed.us. 

Individuals who use 

telecommunication devices for the deaf 

(TDD) may call the Federal Information 

Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 

between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern 

Standard Time, Monday through Friday. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

meeting is open to the public. The 

following business will be conducted: 

(1) Introductions of all committee 

members, replacement members and 

Forest Service personnel; (2) Review 

status of approved projects; (3) Review, 

evaluate and recommend project 

proposals to be funded with Title II 

money; (4) Create a timeline to receive 

and review new project proposals and 

schedule the next meeting; and (5) 

Public Comment. Persons who wish to 

bring related matters to the attention of 

the Committee may file written 

statements with the Committee staff 

before or after the meeting. 

Dated: March 15, 2011. 

Dan S. Dallas, 

Forest Supervisor. 

[FR Doc. 2011–6531 Filed 3–18–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–11–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[Docket 20–2011] 

Foreign-Trade Zone 106—Oklahoma 

City, OK Application for 

Reorganization/Expansion Under 

Alternative Site Framework 

An application has been submitted to 

the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board 

(the Board) by the Port Authority of 

Greater Oklahoma City, grantee of FTZ 

106, requesting authority to reorganize 

and expand the zone under the 

alternative site framework (ASF) 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES