alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
How to Use the #SleeveUp Social 

Media Graphic PowerPoint Template

STEP 1: SELECT A SLIDE

Determine which frame style and message you would you 

like to use. 

STEP 4: SAVE IMAGE

Export your new image by saving your file as a JPEG. Click 

File > Export and select JPEG from the file format drop 

down menu. Choose the option for either ‘current slide only’ 

or ‘every slide‘ for multiple photos and click export. 

4

STEP 2: SELECT A PHOTO

To upload the photo into the template, click Insert > 

Picture > Picture from File from the toolbar. Navigate to 

the image you wish to use. 

If the photo you selected is not cropped correctly, select 

Format Picture or the landscape icon, then click Crop and 

correct your image on the slide. Click outside the image area 

when you are satisfied.

2

STEP 3: SEND PHOTO TO BACK

To send the photo to back, right click on photo and select 

‘Send to back.’ 

Delete the “Insert Picture Here” text box.

3

1

Instructions are relevant to Microsoft Office 2010.
### §5958. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 105–391, title IV, §409, Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3512; Pub. L. 111–11, title VII, §7403, Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1219, related to National Park Service Concessions Management Advisory Board. See section 101919 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EarthLink, Inc.(the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, KevinM. Dotts, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:

 

(1)          the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  KEVIN  M. DOTTS |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
|                           |   |
| Kevin  M. Dotts                |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer       |   |
| October 31,  2008         |   |

 

----
No. 21281.

#### George James McNamara, etc. *v.*The People of the State of Colorado.

(410 P.2d 517)

Decided January 31, 1966

*140Epstein, Epstein & Lozow, Alex Stephen Keller, for plaintiff in error.

Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy, John P. Moore, Assistant, for defendant in error.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Justice Pringle

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Plaintiff in error, George James McNamara, hereinafter called McNamara, by writ of error seeks to reverse a judgment of the district court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

McNamara was charged in an information with being a fugitive from justice from the State of Iowa for the crime of bigamy. Thereafter, he filed his petition for writ of habeas corpus alleging that he was not a fugitive because he was not in Iowa at the time of the alleged offense. No warrant of commitment, or affidavit in lieu thereof, was attached to the petition.

*141No writ was ever issued, nor was any return as such ever filed by the respondents named in the petition. Instead, the trial court, over the objection of McNamara, proceeded to a hearing and final determination upon the petition itself. As a result of this hearing it denied the petition.

 The trial court was correct in denying the petition, but it should have done so summarily and without a hearing. Under the settled law of this state, a petition which is not accompanied by a copy of the warrant of commitment or an affidavit stating that such has been requested of the custodian and refused by him has no validity and cannot be acted upon. *Wright v. Tinsley,*148 Colo. 258, 365 P.2d 691.

We would again point out that the procedure of holding a hearing on a petition for habeas corpus is completely foreign to the law of this state. If a petition is in proper form and shows on its face that relief must be granted, providing the allegations contained therein are true, then the court must issue the writ. A return would then be required to be made by the person to whom the writ is issued. The issue is made upon the answer and return and the petition then becomes *functus officio.*This is the statutory procedure which is mandatory upon all courts of this state. *Struble v. Hicks,*123 Colo. 16, 224 P.2d 932.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### In the Matter of Adele Dziedziak, Respondent, against Thomas Maddock, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.