alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 21 

To constitute the minority party’s membership on certain committees for 

the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress, or until their successors are chosen. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 17, 2019 

Mr. SCHUMER submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To constitute the minority party’s membership on certain 

committees for the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress, 

or until their successors are chosen. 

1 Resolved, That the following shall constitute the mi2 nority party’s membership on the following committees for 

3 the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress, or until their suc4 cessors are chosen: 

5 COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES: 

6 Mr. Manchin, Mr. Wyden, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Sanders, Ms. 

7 Stabenow, Mr. Heinrich, Ms. Hirono, Mr. King, Ms. Cor8 tez Masto. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of Hawkins, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
period ended March 29, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kathleen P. Pepski, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                                           | 
|---------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Kathleen
 P. Pepski                                    | 
|                                                           | 
|Kathleen P.
 Pepski
 Chief Financial Officer
 June 5, 2009

43

---
EXHIBIT 32

| |  |  |  | CERTIFICATION |  | OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
| |  |  |  | ------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of ASP Ventures Corp. (Registrant) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Nora Coccaro, chief executive officer and chief financial officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) |  | This Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of Registrant at the end of the period covered by this Report and results of operations of Registrant for the period covered by this Report.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Nora Coccaro

Nora Coccaro

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

July 20, 2006

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Louis Derrwaldt, Administrator, Appellee, v. Beauregard F. Moseley et al., On Appeal of Beauregard F. Moseley, Appellant.

Gen. No. 14,959.

*Bonds—what damages not recoverable.*Damages cannot be recovered in an action upon a bond for a breach not assigned in the declaration.

Action of debt. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Ben M. Smith, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1908.

Affirmed on remittitur.

Opinion filed April 8, 1910.

Edward H. Morris, for appellant.

Josiah Burnham:, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Mack

delivered the opinion of the court.

In ah action on an appeal bond given in a forcible detainer case, the jury awarded the plaintiff $447.40 damages.

The only breach assigned was the non-payment of rent during the period that the possession of the premises was withheld. It was ten and a half months before plaintiff recovered possession under a writ of restitution. The damages on this account were agreed to be $40 a month and amounted therefore to $420.

Evidence of the amount of court costs expended aggregating $27.40 and of repairs made due to damage caused to the premises during the time possession was withheld, was permitted to be introduced. This was-error, for while such payments could, on a proper declaration, have been recovered, no breach of the bond in these respects had been assigned.

It is, however, perfectly clear that the jury allowed nothing for the repairs. Inasmuch as a verdict for $420 could have been directed by the court, the error in admitting this testimony and in giving an instruction in relation thereto will be cured by a *remittitur.*

*434Although appellant in his brief claims that the court erred in refusing to receive proper evidence, an examination of the abstract fails to disclose that any of the defendants’ evidence was excluded.

If appellee will remit the excess over $420 within ten days the judgment for that amount will be affirmed; otherwise it will be reversed and remanded.

*Affirmed, on remittitur.*

*Remittitur*filed and judgment affirmed April' 13, 1910.
09/17/2020 K315822- CS

10 هغه شیان چې تاسې یې په کور کې د خپلو

کویډ – 19 عالیمو مدیریت کولو لپارهکولی شئ

دالرسيس وړ نسخه: html.sick-when-steps/sick-are-you-if/ncov/2019-coronavirus/gov.cdc.www://https

که تاسې ممکن یا تایید شوی کویډ – 19 لرئ:

ته مه ځئ. او د نورو عامه ځایونو نه لیرې . په کور کې پاتې شئ کار یا ښوونځي

اوسیږئ. که تاسې اړ یې چې بهر تهالړشئ،

هیڅ ډول عامه ټرانسپورټیشن، ګډه سپريل یا

ګډ ټرانسپورټ، یا ټیکيس مه کاروئ.

	. خپل عالیم په دقت رسه نظارت

کړئ. که ستاسې عالیم وخیم کیږي یا

سختیږي نو سمدالسه خپل د روغتیا

پاملرنې وړاندې کونکي ته تلیفون وکړئ. 

وڅښئ. 	. ارام وکړئاو مایعات

	. که طبي مالقات یا د ډاکټر رسه مالقات

لرې، نو د وختنه مخکې

روغتیاپال یاډاکټر ته تلیفون وکړه

او ورته ووایه چې کوويډ – 19 باندې

اخته یې یا شاید اخته اوسې.

	. د عاجل طبي حاالتو لپاره، 911

شمیرې ته تلیفون وکړئ اودپیغام

ترالسه کونکي پرسونل ته

خبر ورکړئچې ته کوويډ – 19

باندې اخته یې یا شاید اخته اوسې.

	. خپل ټوخي یا پرنجي ته

دستامل ونیسئ یا خپله څنګل ورته

ونیسئ. 

ثانیی په صابون او اوبو ومینځئ یا د 	. خپل السونه ډیر ځله لږترلږه 20

الکولوالس پاکونکي داسې موادو )سنیټایزر( 

رسه خپل السونه پاک کړئ چې لږترلږه

%60 الکول ولري. 

باید په یوه ځانګړې خونه کې او د 	. په خپل کور کې د امکان تر حد پورې

نورو خلکو نه لیرې و اوسیږې. 

همدارنګه، که موجود وي نو باید جال حامم

وکاروې. که تاسې اړ یې چې په کور کې

دننه یا بهر د نورو خلکو شاوخوا اوسئ، نو

ماسک واغوندئ.

شخيص شیان مه رشیکوئ، لکه لوخي یا . په کورنۍ کې دنورو خلکو رسه خپل

قابونه، جان پاکونه، او د ویده کیدو تخت

لوازم.

کیږي پاکوئ لکه کاونټرونه، میزونه، او د 10.ټولې هغه سطحې چې ډیرې ملس

دروازوالستي. د کور پاکولو سپری ګانې یا

جارو د لیبل الرښوونو مطابق وکاروئ.

coronavirus/gov.cdc
#### § 40.9 Reprisals.

The grievance procedure shall prohibit reprisals. “Reprisal” means any action or threat of action against anyone for the good faith use of or good faith participation in the grievance procedure. The written procedure shall include assurance that good faith use of or good faith participation in the grievance mechanism will not result in formal or informal reprisal. An inmate shall be entitled to pursue through the grievance procedure a complaint that a reprisal occurred.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.11


DATE:      10/4/96

TO:        DAVE STEGEMOLLER


FROM:      ROGER BURTRAW


SUBJECT:   RETENTION BONUS


         The Company has approved a "special bonus" designed to retain your
services during any effort to sell the Powertrain Division of Harvard
Industries, or Harvard Industries.  If you remain with Harvard Industries
throughout the effort to sell and a sale is consummated, you will receive a
bonus of $250,000 with necessary legal deductions ten (10) business days after
the closing.

         To be eligible for this bonus, you must remain with Harvard Industries
throughout the effort to make such a sale and actively participate in the
process.  If a sale is consummated, you will receive this payment within ten
(10) business days following the closing.

         This is not an agreement by the Company to retain your services during
this period.

         This agreement will be effective on this date and will expire at the
end of one (1) year unless renewed in writing by the Company thirty (30) days
prior to its expiration.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.16.1

                                    WESTCORP

                         EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN
                            AND SALARY SAVINGS PLAN

                                 PLAN AMENDMENT

The Westcorp Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Salary Savings Plan (restated
1997) is hereby amended effective December, 1998 as follows:

SECTION 6.7. FORFEITURE FROM EMPLOYER MATCHING CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT.

Any amount of a Participant's Employer Matching Contribution Account that is
forfeited shall be used in the following manner:

             a.  First, to restore the Employer Matching Contribution Accounts
                 or ESOP Contribution Accounts of former Participants under
                 Section 8.7 below;

             b.  Second, to reduce the Employer Matching Contributions to the
                 Plan; and

             c.  Third, to be allocated to the accounts of Participants in a
                 non-discriminatory manner, to reduce Employer contributions
                 not provided in Sections 6.7 or 6.8, or to be allocated to the
                 ESOP Contribution Accounts pursuant to Section 6.3.

SECTION 6.8 FORFEITURES FROM ESOP CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT.

Any amount of a Participant's ESOP Contribution Account that is forfeited shall
be used in the following manner:

             a.  First, to restore the Employer Matching Contribution Accounts
                 or ESOP Contribution Accounts of former Participants under
                 Section 8.7 below; and/or

             b.  Second, to be allocated to the account of Participants in a
                 non-discriminatory manner, to Reduce Employer contributions
                 not provided in Sections 6.7 or 6.8, or to be allocated to the
                 ESOP Contribution Accounts pursuant to Section 6.3.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer has signed this Plan Amendment this 20th day of
January, 1999.

                                                 WESTCORP

                                                 By: /s/ AMY FITZGERALD
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Title: Chairman, ESOP Committee
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7097

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SHERMAN LEWIS, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CR-87-53) Submitted: March 23, 2000 Decided: March 29, 2000 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sherman Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Dickerson Kocher, OFFICEOF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the notice of appeal was not filed in the district court until July 7, 1999, for the purposes of this appeal we assume that the date Lewis wrote on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it would have been submitted to prison authorities. See Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988). 2 PER CURIAM: Sherman Lewis seeks to appeal an order of the district courtdenying his motion to reconsider the denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence under Fed. R. Crim. P. 35. The district court’s order was entered June 15, 1999. Under Fed. R. App. P. 4(b), Lewis had ten days from entry of that order on the criminal docket to note his appeal. His notice of appeal was dated June 28, 1999, * thirteen days after entry of the order. The appeal periods of Fed. R. App. P. 4 are “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Because Lewis failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 401.104 Preparation of new records.

The provisions of this part apply only to existing records that are reasonably described in a request filed with the Commission pursuant to the procedures herein established. The Commission shall not be required to prepare new records in order to respond to a request for information.

[89 FR 51827, June 20, 2024]
§ 777.3 Background. ( a ) Executive Order 11990 (42 FR 26961, 3 CFR, 1977 Comp., p. 121) Protection of Wetlands, and DOT Order 5660.1A,[1] Preservation of the Nation's Wetlands, emphasize the important functions and values inherent in the Nation's wetlands. Federal agencies are directed to avoid new construction in wetlands unless the head of the agency determines that: ( 1 ) There is no practicable alternative to such construction, and
( 2 ) The proposed action includes all practicable measures to minimize harm to wetlands which may result from such use.
( b ) Sections 103 and 133 of title 23, U.S. Code, identify additional approaches for mitigation and management of impacts to wetlands and natural habitats which result from projects funded pursuant to title 23, U.S. Code, as eligible for participation with title 23, U.S. Code, funds.
( c ) 33 CFR parts 320 through 330, Regulatory Program, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Section 404, Clean Water Act and 40 CFR part 230, Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines for the Specification of Disposal Sites for Dredged or Fill Material, establish requirements for the permitting of discharge of dredge or fill material in wetlands and other waters of the United States.
( d ) Federal Guidance for the Establishment, Use, and Operation of Mitigation Banks presents guidance for the use of ecological mitigation banks as compensatory mitigation in the Section 404 Regulatory Program for unavoidable impacts to wetlands and other aquatic resources.
( e ) Interagency Cooperation—Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (50 CFR part 402), presents regulations establishing interagency consultation procedures relative to impacts to species listed under the authority of the Act and their habitats as required by Section 7, Interagency Coordination, of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1536).
Footnotes -
777.3
[1] DOT Order 5660.1A is available for inspection and copying from FHWA headquarters and field offices as prescribed at 49 CFR part 7.
#### Lewis REDDEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John P. GALLEY, Warden; Attorney General for the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees. Lewis Redden, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles F. Mades, Sheriff; Property Control Officer, John Doe; Property Officer, John Doe; Patrol Commander, John Doe; Randy Wilkinson, First Sergeant, Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 02-6035, 02-6190.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 21, 2002.

Decided May 14, 2002.

Lewis Redden, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Celia Anderson Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland; Tracey Brown Dawson, Steptoe & Johnson, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

No. 02-6035 dismissed and No. 02-6190 affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

*136PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated cases, Lewis Redden seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 *&*Supp.2001) (No. 02-6035) and the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint (No. 02-6190). We have reviewed the records and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, in No. 02-6035, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *See Redden v. Galley,*No. GA-01-427-MJG (D.Md. Dec. 19, 2001). In No. 02-6190, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Redden v. Mades,*No. CA-01-2918-MJG (D.Md. Jan. 15, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

*AFFIRMED.*
### §40b. Cooperative agreements with States or local agencies; expansion; Federal contributions

If in the opinion of the Secretary of the Interior, the aforesaid educational facilities cannot be provided adequately and payment made therefor on a pro rata basis, as prescribed in section 40a of this title, the Secretary of the Interior, in his discretion, may enter into cooperative agreements with States or local agencies for (a) the operation of school facilities, (b) for the construction and expansion of local facilities at Federal expense, and (c) for contribution by the Federal Government, on an equitable basis satisfactory to the Secretary, to cover the increased cost to local agencies for providing the educational services required for the purposes of sections 40a to 40c of this title.

(June 4, 1948, ch. 417, §2, 62 Stat. 339.)
### §450aa–1. Establishment and supervision

The property acquired under the provisions of section 450aa of this title shall constitute the George Washington Carver National Monument and shall be a public national memorial to George Washington Carver. The Director of the National Park Service, under the direction of the Secretary of the Interior, shall have the supervision, management, and control of such national monument, and shall maintain and preserve it in a suitable and enduring manner which, in his judgment, will provide for the benefit and enjoyment of the people of the United States.

(July 14, 1943, ch. 238, §2, 57 Stat. 563.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
### SERVED: JULY 23, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS**~** F; ; i '
..--.**·~~ ~**  t**~ ~-**  • -.F

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF HEATH TECNA, INC. DOCKETNO. FAA 2014- 0325 (Civil Penalty Action).

ORDER OFDISMISSAL The Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter referred to as "Complainant") filed a Complaint dated July I, 2013. Heath Teena, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "Respondent") filed a Request for Hearing dated June 13, 2014. Respondent asked to withdraw its Request for Hearing on July 21,2014. 14 C.P.R. § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency attorney may withdraw a complaint or partymay withdraw arequest for a hearing without the consent ofthe administrative lawjudge. Ifan agency attorney withdraws the complaint or a party withdrawsthe request for a hearing and the answer, the administrative lawjudge shall dismiss the proceedings underthis subpart withprejudice." WHEREFORE, the within filed Request to Withdraw Request for Hearing having been read and considered, it be and is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Respondent's Request to Withdraw Request for Hearing be and is hereby granted; and 2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed withprejudice.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service ListSERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY FederalAviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1

Mark Bartlett, Respondent's Counsel Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98101-3045 TEL: 206-757-8298 FAX: 206-757-7298 ONE COPY

Jeffrey M. Harper, Complainant's Counsel Federal Aviation Administration Northwest Mountain Region (ANM-7) 1601 Lind Avenue Southwest Renton, W A 98057 TEL: 425-227-2161 FAX: 425-227-1007 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant· FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0325 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 2
### §5107. Financial assistance

The Secretary and the Secretary of the Interior may provide financial assistance to the Commission and to the States to carry out their respective responsibilities under this chapter, including—

(1) the preparation, implementation, and enforcement of coastal fishery management plans; and

(2) State activities that are specifically required within such plans.

(Pub. L. 103–206, title VIII, §808, Dec. 20, 1993, 107 Stat. 2453.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Reports

Pub. L. 106–555, title I, §122(c), Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2766, provided that:

"(1) Annual report to the Secretary.—The Secretary shall require, as a condition of providing financial assistance under this subtitle [subtitle B (§§121, 122) of title I of Pub. L. 106–555, amending sections 5101 to 5103, 5106, and 5107a to 5108 of this title and enacting provisions set out as a note under section 5101 of this title], that the Commission and each State receiving such assistance submit to the Secretary an annual report that provides a detailed accounting of the use of the assistance.

"(2) Biennial reports to the Congress.—The Secretary shall submit biennial reports to the Committee on Resources [now Committee on Natural Resources] of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate on the use of Federal assistance provided to the Commission and the States under this subtitle. Each biennial report shall evaluate the success of such assistance in implementing this subtitle."