ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT CABINET OFFICE OFTHE SECRETARY Steven L. Beshear Governor



### Ms. Gwen Keyes-Fleming Regional Administrator U.S. EPA, Region 4 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Suite 9T43 Atlanta, GA 30303-8960
DearMs. Fleming, Capital Plaza Tower 500 Mero Street, 12111 Floor Frankfort, Kentucl<y 40601 Phone: (502) 564-3350

Fax: (502) 564-7484

http://eec.ky.gov 

### May 3, 2012 Leonard K. Peters Secretary



### In a letter dated May 26, 2011, the Kentucky Divisionfor Air Quality (Division) received a State ImplementationPlan (SIP) submittal package from Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District (District). The package includedtwo separate SIP requests for one regulation and one specific source. The requested actions are as follows: 1. Regulation 3.01, version 5,

### AmbientAir Quality Standards- Submit for Approval into the SIP. 2. FordMotor Company, Louisville Assembly Plant, Reasonably Available Control Technology (NOx RACT)- Withdrawthe NOx RACT permitfrom the SIP andreplace itwith Title V PermitNo. 147-97-TV (R2). The Division granted concurrence for Regulation 3.01 in a letter dated June 23, 2011. Concurrence for replacing the Ford Motor CompanyNOx RACT Board Order from the SIP with Title V PermitNo. 147-97-TV (R2) is hereby granted as well. The Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet (Cabinet) hereby requests thatthe U.S. EPA approve the enclosed regulatory amendments as arevisionto the Jefferson Countyportion ofthe Kentucky SIP. Included inthe administratively complete SIP submittal package are documentation ofpublic commentperiods andpublic hearings that were held in regardto these SIP revisions.

KentuckyUnbridledSpirit.com An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/0

### Ms.GwenKeyes-Fleming May 3, 2012 Page 2

Additionally, pursuantto 40 CFR 51.103(a), two hard copies and a disc containing all documents are included. The Cabinet appreciates yourpromptresponse to this request. Ifyou have any further questions or concerns regarding this submittal, please contact Andrea Smith at (502) 564-3999, ext. 4410 or by e-mail at Andrea.Smith@ky.gov.

Cc: Lynorae Benjamin LKP/lg Enclosures

KentuckyUnbridledSpirit.com

# ~~ Leonard K. Peters, Secretary

An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/DAIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT
GREG FISCHER MAYOR

Mr. JohnLyons, Director Divisionfor Air Quality 200 Fair Oaks Lane, 1stFloor Frankfort, KY 40601

## Dear~: 

## ]:hM,' LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY LAUREN ANDERSON, DIRECTOR May 26,2011

TheAirPollution ControlDistrict ofJefferson County (District) requests thatthe enclosed materialbe submitted to theU.S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA) as revisions to theJefferson Countyportion oftheKentucky StateImplementation Plan (SIP). Enclosed are two papercopies and two CD's, one ofeach for the EPA and one ofeach for the Kentucky Divisionfor Air Quality (DAQ). This package contains separate SIP requests for one regulation and one source specific requirements. The Districtrequests thatthe Commonwealthrequest the following for each: 1. Regulation

### 3.01,AmbientAir QualityStandards- Submit for approvalinto the SIP. 2. FordMotor Co., LouisvilleAssemblyPlant, ReasonablyAvailable Control Technology for a major source ofoxides ofnitrogen (NOx RACT) Board Order- Withdrawfrom the SIP. Yourpromptconsideration ofthis request is appreciated. 

### Ifyou have any questions or comments, please contactMs. CynthiaLee at (502) 574-7217.

Enclosures Sincerely, 

# Kc?---

LaurenAnderson Executive Director

www.louisvilleky.gov WWW.LOUISVILLEKY.GOV/APCD 850 BARRET AVENUE, ROOM 205' LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY 40204-1745 502.574.6000 FAX, 5'02.574.5306 

# I 

# I 1 

## ! 

# I I 

# I l 

# I ! f. 

### '**~** 

## I ! 

# I 

# I ! 

# I I I 

# I !

### louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District State Implementation Plan Amendment Submittal
District Regulations Regulation 3.01, AmbientAir QualityStandards 

### Source Specific NOx RACT Ford Motor Co., Louisville Assembly Plant



### Prepared by: louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District 850 Barret Avenue, Room 205 louisville, Kentucky 40204

May26,2011Contents

District Regulation 3.01 AmbientAir QualityStandards Request for EPA Action Completeness Checklist and Pollutant/Area Identification Regulation Version 4 (June 2005) Regulation Version 5 (April 2011) Red line strike out version Final version Regulatory Impact Assessment Comment Response Document Strategy Committee Meeting Agenda Strategy Committee Minutes Public Notices- first and second Public Hearing and Board Meeting Minutes ofthe Public Hearing Minutes ofthe Regular Meeting



# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ford Motor Co., LAP Request for EPA Action Permit No: 147-97-TV (R2) pages 4 and 45 Board Order Public Notice Cover letter Permit No: 147-97-TV (R2) and Statement of Basis Permit No: 245-09-C (R1) and Statement of BasisRegulations 3.01 District Part 3 Regulations were consolidated into one regulation and the National Ambient Air Quality Standards were updated on June 21, 2005. The version of Regulation 3.01, Purpose ofStandards and Expression ofNon-Degradation Intention that is currently approved in the SIP is Version 3 dated June 13, 1979. This approval was published at 66 FR 53658 on October 23, 2001. The amendment that occurred on June 21, 2005 (Version 4) includes the contents of Regulations 3.02, 3.03, 3.04, and 3.05. The version of Regulation 3.02, Applicability of AmbientAir QualityStandards that is currently approved in the SIP is Version 3 dated June 13, 1979. The version of Regulation 3.03, Definitions, that is currently approved in the SIP is Version 3 dated June 13, 1979. The version of Regulation 3.04, AmbientAir Quality Standards, that is currently approved in the SIP is Version 5 dated April20, 1988. The version of Regulation 3.05, Methods ofMeasurements, that is currently approved in the SIP is Version 4 dated April 20, 1988. These approvals were published at 66 FR 53658 on October 23, 2001. All four regulations were repealed and superseded by Regulation 3.01 on June 21, 2005. The District forwarded Regulation 3.01 Version 4, renamed AmbientAir QualityStandards, tothe Kentucky Division for Air Quality (DAQ) for submittal to EPA to revise the SIP on November 9, 2010. The submission was subsequently forwarded to EPA, Region 4 on March 22, 2011. An administratively complete package forVersion 5AmbientAir QualityStandards, is contained herein. The District requests that the Commonwealth request that Version 5 of Regulation 3.01 be approved into the SIP.

## Completeness Checklist Regulation 3.01 AmbientAir Quality Standards,formerly, Purpose of Standards andExpression of Non-Degradation Intention Regulation Version 4 (June 2005) Regulation Version 5 (April 2011) Red line strike out version Final version Regulatory Impact Assessment CommentResponse Document Strategy Committee Meeting Agenda Strategy Committee Minutes Public Notices- first and second Public Hearing and BoardMeetingAgenda Minutes ofthe Public Hearing Minutes ofthe Regular Meeting 

## Pollutant/ Area Identification
Pollutant: All Affected Area: Jefferson County, Kentucky Location: Louisville MSA Area Designation: Nonattainment- Annual PM2.s; Attainment- all otherpollutants Area SIP Status: Ozone- maintenance Resulting Emissions Changes: N/A Increase Decrease

-------

·.:·'·

### PART 3 AmbientAir Quality Standards REGULATION 3.01 AmbientAir Quality Standards AirPollution ControlDistrictofJefferson County Jefferson County, Kentucky Relates To: KRS Chapter 77 Air Pollution Control PursuantTo: KRS Chapter 77 Air Pollution Control Necessity And Function: KRS 77.180 authorizes the Air Pollution Control Board to adopt and enforce all orders, rules, and regulations necessary or proper to accomplish the purposes ofKRS Chapter 77. This regulation establishes ambient air quality standards, the methods for measuring air contaminants, and the intention of the Board to prohibit further significant and avoidable deterioration ofair quality. SECTION 1 Definitions Terms used in this regulation that are not defined in this regulation shall have the meaning given them in Regulation 

### 1.02 Definitions. 

### SECTION 2Purpose The purpose of an ambient air quality standard is to establish a concentration, including a time-averaging interval over which that concentration is measured, for a particular air contaminantthat the Board determines is necessary, with an adequate margin ofsafety, to protect public health and welfare from any known or anticipated adverse effect ofthat air contaminant. SECTION 3Non-degradationIntention In establishing an ambient air quality standard, it is the intention ofthe Board to prohibit further significant and avoidable deterioration of air quality in areas where the air quality is presently numerically equal t.o orbetterthan the standard. SECTION 4General Prohibition A person shall not cause or allow the emission of an air contaminant that would violate, or interfere with the attainment or maintenance of, an ambient air quality standard.

7-05 

### 3.01-1

### SECTION 5 AmbientAir Quality Standards Secondary Air Contaminant Primary Standards Averaging Times Standards 5.1 Carbon Monoxide 5.1.1 9 ppm (10 mg/m3) 

### 8-hour1 

### None 5.1.2 35 ppm (40 mg/m3) 

### 1-hour1 

### None 5.2 Lead 1.5 )lg/m3 

### QuarterlyAverage Same as Primary 5.3 Nitrogen Dioxide 0.053 ppm (100 )lg/m3) 

### Annual Same as Primary (Arithmetic Mean) 5.4 ParticulateMatter 5.4.1 (PM10) 50 )lglm3 

### Annuaf Same as Primary (Arithmetic Mean) 5.4.2 150 )lg/m3 

### 24-hour7 

### 5.5 ParticulateMatter 5.5.1 (PM2.s) 15 )lg/m3 

### Annuae Same as Primary (Arithmetic Mean) 5.5.2 65 )lglm3 

### 24-hour 4 

### 5.6 Ozone 5.6.1 0.08 ppm 8-hour5 

### Same as Primary 5.6.2 0.12 ppm 1-hour 6 

### Same as Primary 5.7 Sulfur Oxides 5.7.1 0.03 ppm Annual (Arithmetic Mean) 5.7.2 0.14 ppm 24-hour1 

### 5.7.3 3-hour1 

### 0.5 ppm (1300 )lg/m3) 

### 5.8 Hydrogen Sulfide Maximum 1-hour 14 )lg/m3• 1 

### average 5.9 Gaseous Fluorides 5.9.1 (expressed as HF) 400 )lglm3 

### Annual arithmetic mean 5.9.2 Maximum 0.82 )lg/m3 

### 1-month average
7-05 3.01-2Secondary Air Contaminant Primary Standards Averaging Times Standards 5.9.3 Maximum 1.64 flg/m3 1-week average 5.9.4 800 flg/m3 Maximum 2.86 f.Lg/m3 24-hour average 5.9.5 Maximum 3.68 flg/m3 12-hour average 5.10 Total Fluorides8 5.10.1 

### G . 9 rowmg season 40 ppm (w/w) 5.10.2 2-month average 60 ppm (w/w) 5.10.3 1-month average 80 ppm (w/w)
1 Notto be exceeded more than once peryear. 2 To attain this standard, the expected annual arithmetic mean PM10 concentration at each monitor within an area must not exceed 50 flg/m3

. 3 To attain this standard, the 3-year average ofthe annual arithmetic mean PM2.5 concentrations from single ormultiple community-oriented monitors mustnot exceed 15 flg/m3• 4 To attain this standard, the 3-year average ofthe 98th percentile of24-hour concentrations at each population-oriented monitor within an area must not exceed 65 flg/m3• 5 To attain this standard, the 3-year average of the fourth-highest daily maximum 8-hour average ozone concentrations measured at each monitor within an area over each year must not exceed 0.08 ppm. 6 The standard is attained when the expected number ofdays per calendar year with maximum hourly average concentrations above 0.12 ppm is :S 1, as determined by 40 CPR Part 50 Appendix H. The 1-hour ozone standard shall be in effect until June 15, 2005. 7 To attain this standard, the 3-year average of the annual 99th percentile values at each monitoring site mustnot exceed 150 f.Lg/m3

. 8 Dryweightbasis (as fluoride ion) in and on forage for consumption by grazingruminants. 9 Average concentration ofmonthly samples over growing season (not to exceed 6 consecutive months).
SECTION6 Applicability ofAmbientAir Quality Standards The ambient air quality standards shall apply, be achieved, and maintained in Jefferson County, Kentucky.
SECTION7 Methods ofMeasurement
7-05 3.01-3

### The air contaminants listed in sections 5.1 to 5.7 shall be measured by the reference or equivalent methods and at the frequency specified in EPA regulations on Ambient Air Quality Surveillance (40 CPRParts 50, 53, and 58).

SECTION8Savings Clause 

### Any emission standard established pursuant to Regulation 3.04 

### AmbientAir Quality Standards section 1.7, 2.7, 2.8, or 2.9 that is reflected in a permit condition as ofJuly 1, 

### 2005, shall remain in effect until replaced with an emission standard establishedpursuantto Regulation 5.21. Adopted vl/4-19-72; effective 4-19-72; amended v2/9-1-76, v3/6-13-79, v4/6-21-05 effective 7-1-05.

7-05 3.01-4

### Version 5/Draft #1 February 16, 2011 [][adopted, this wouldamendthe July 1, 2005 version o[Regulation 3.017
PART 

### -3 AmbientAir Quality Standards REGULATION 3.01 AmbientAir Quality Standards Louisville Metro AirPollution ControlDistrict ofJefferson County Jefferson County, Kentucky Relates To: KRS Chapter 77 AirPollution Control Pursuant To: KRS Chapter 77 AirPollution Control Necessity And Function: KRS 77.180 authorizes the Air Pollution Control Board to adopt and enforce all orders, rules, and regulations necessary orproper to accomplish the purposes ofKRS Chapter77. -_Thisregulation establishes ambient air quality standardsto protectpublichealth and welfare. , the methods for measuring air contaminants, and the intention ofthe Boardto prohibit further significant and avoidable deterioration ofair quality. SECTION 1_-Definitions Termsused inthis regulationthat are not defined in this regulation shall havethe meaning givento them in Regulation 1.02,

### Definitions. SECTION 2 Purpose The purpose ofan ambient air quality standards in Section 7 ofthis regulation-fs-te establish a concentrations of air contaminants, , measured over a including a time-averaging interval
..-e¥eF which that concentration is measured, for aparticular air contaminantthatthe Board determines is necessary, that are necessary with an adequate margin ofsafety, to protect public health with an adequate margin ofsafety -and public welfare from any known or anticipated adverse effect§. of theseat air contaminant§.. SECTION 3 Non-Degradation Intention**~-an-ambient** air quality standards in Section 7 ofthis regulation are intended,it is the intention ofthe Board to prevent theprohibit significant further significant and avoidable deterioration ofair quality in those areas where the air quality is presently numerically equal to or betterthan the standard. SECTION 4 GeneralProhibition NoA person shall-Bet cause or allow the emission ofan air contaminant that would violate, or interfere with the attainment or maintenance of, an ambient air quality standard.
SECTIONS Methods ofMeasurement The air contaminant concentrations listed in sections 7.1 to 7.7 shall be measured by the reference -orequivalent methods and at the frequency specified in 40 CPRParts 50, 53, and 58 relatingto 3.01 5

### Version 5/Draft#1 February 16, 2011 [I{

### adopted, this wouldamendthe July 1, 2005 version o{Regulation 3.011
ambient air quality surveillance.

SECTION 6 Savings Clause Any emission standard established pursuantto Regulation 3.04

### AmbientAir Quality Standards sections 1.7, 2.7, 2.8, or 2.9 and included as a permit condition as ofJuly 1, 2005, shall remain in effect until replaced with an emission standard established pursuant to Regulation 5.21.
SECTION SECTION 7.§ AmbientAir Quality Standards The following air contaminant concentrations shall be applied, achieved and maintained in Jefferson County, Kentucky:
Seeendary Ail' Gentaminant Pl'imary Stanaal'as lnzel'aging ±imes Stanaal'as 5.1 Gal'ben Mene*ide 5.1.1 

### 9ppm EHl**mg/m~j** 8 fieHl Neoo 5.1.2**~~ppm** E4Q**mg/m~j** l fieHl NeHS 5.2 bead**l.~** j±gffil QHart:eFly 2<\:'Y:eFage Same as PFimffi'y 5.3 NitFegen Die*ide**Q.Q~~** wm (lQQ f±gklj AHHHal Same as PFimaFy EAfitfl:metie MeaH1 5.4**Pal'tie~:~late** Mattei' 5.4.1 

### fFM±ot**~Q j±ghn~** **AHHHal~** Same as PFimaFy EA:Fitflmetie MeaH1 5.4.2 l§Q**~::~g,Lm~ ~4**  R8Hf:;z 5.5 Pal'tieHiate Mattei' 5.5.1**~j l~** **j±ghn~ AHHHal~**  Same as .Primafy E26ttitfl:metie MeaH1 5.5.2**6~ j±g/m~** **~4** R8Hf 4 5.6 Q'lene 5.6.1 Q.Q8 ppm 8 R8Hf,) Same as .PFimaFy 5.6.2**Q.l~** ppm 1 M:eHF" Same as PFimaFy 

### H**S~:~lful'** Q*ides**~.01 ~** 

### Version 5/Draft #1 February 16, 2011 [l[adopted, this wouldamendthe July 1, 2005 version o[Regulation 3.017
Seeeadaey Ail' Geatamiaaat FFimaey StaadaFds fr.'eFagiag +imes StaadaFds**~** 0.03 ppm Annual (AFithmetie Mean)**~** O.l4 ppm**~4** heul**~** J-he.uf+ 0.5 ppm 

### 0300 !lg/mJ) 

### -5-.& HydFegea Sulfide Mredmum l fl8Uf l4**!lg/m~_+** average**~** Gaseeus FlueFides 

### -5-4.-l- (expFessed as HF) 400 rtg/nl Annual arithmetie -ffiWil**~** Mfr*imum**0.8~** !lg/mJ 1 menth avemge**~** Ma*imum 1.64 !lg/mJ 1week a>refage §.;.9.4 800 !lg/mJ**Ma~dmum ~.86**  !lg/mJ**~4** heur avemge**~ Ma~<imum**  3.68 !lg/mJ l**~** heUF average**~** Tetal FlueFides8**~** Gwwing seasen9 40 ppm (n•l"z) HI H**~ ~**  menth a>,zerage 60 ppm 

### ('1' 1 

### '1'1**ttl~t ~**  l menth a'f'efage 80 ppm (n '1

### '"1**tt/'t~**

### I~ 3.01 5Version 5/Draft#I February I6, 20II [Jfadopted, this wouldamendthe July I, 2005 version o[Regulation 3.0Il

# ~ Pollutant 

# I 7.1 Carbon Monoxide

7.1.1 8-HourAverage 9ppm \lJ None 7.1.2 1-HourAverage 35 ppm (IJ 7.2 Lead 7.2.1 Rolling 3-Month Average 0.15 ug/m3 Same as Qrimary 7.3 Nitrogen Dioxide 7.3.1 Annual Average 0.053 J2J2m Same as Qrimary 7.3.2 1-HourAverage 100 ppb (LJ 7.4 Ozone 7.4.1 8-HourAverage 0.075 ppm (2008 std) t<>J Same as Qrimary 7.4.2 0.08 ppm \J) (1997 std) 

### en 7.5 Particulate Matter (measured as PM2.5} 7.5.1 Annual Average 15.0 w:dmc; \ 4J Same as Qrimary 7.5.2**24~Hour** Average 35 ug/m3 PI 7.6 Particulate Matter (measured as PM 10} 7.6.1 24-Hour Average 150 ug/m3 < 3> Same as Qrimary 7.7 Sulfur Oxides 7.7.1 3-HourAverage 

### ----- 0.5 ppm \lJ

- 7.7.2 1-HourAverage 75 PPbm**\~J** 

### ----- 7.8 Hydrogen Sulfide 7.8.1 Maximum 1-Hour average**~ ~~**  14 ug/m3 \ll 7.9 Gaseous Fluorides (exQressed as HF) 

# I 7.9.1 Annual Arithmetic Mean 400 ug/m3

7.9.2 Maximum 1-MonthAverage 0.82 ug/m3< 1> 7.9.3 Maximum 1-Week Average 1.64 ug/m3< 1> 7.9.4 Maximum 24-HourAverage 800 ug/m3<1> 2.86 ug/m3< 1> 7.9.5 Maximum 12-HourAverage 3.68 ug/m3<1J 

# I 7.10 Total Fluorides \Y) 

# I 7.10.1 Growing Season (tVJ 40 QJ2m (w/w}

7.10.2 2-Month Average 60 J2J2m (w/w} 7.10.3 1-MonthAverage 80 QJ2m (w/w}

### I~ 3.01 5

### Version 5/Draft #1 February 16, 2011 [l[adopted, this wouldamendthe July 1, 2005 version o[Regulation 3.017

1- Not to be exceeded more than once per year. 2 To attain this standard, the 3-year average ofthe 98thpercentile ofthe daily maximum 1-hour average at each monitor within an area must not exceed 100 ppb. (Effective January 22, 201 0.) 3 Not to be exceeded more than once peryear on average over 3 years. 4 To attain this standard,-wl:ten the 3-year average ofthe weighted annual mean PM2.5 concentrations from single or multiple community-oriented monitors must not exceed 15.0 ug/m3• 5 To attain this standard, the 3-year average of the 98th percentile of 24-hour concentrations at each population-oriented monitor within an areamust notexceed 35 ug/m3

. (Effective December 17, 2006.) 6 To attain this standard, the 3-year average ofthe fourth-highest daily maximum 8-hour average ozone concentrations measured at each monitor within an area over each year must not exceed 0.075 ppm. (Effective May 27, 2008.)

7 (a) To attainthis standard, the 3-yearaverage ofthe fowihhighestdailymaximum 8-hour average ozone concentrations measured at each monitor within an area over each year must not exceed 0.08 ppm. (b) The 1997 standard

- and the implementation rules for that standard -will remain in place for implementation purposes as EPA undertakes rulemaking to address the transition from the 1997 ozone standard to the 2008 ozone standard. (c) EPA is in the process ofreconsidering the standards set in March 2008. 8 To attain this standard, the 3-year average ofthe 99111 percentile ofthe daily maximum 1-hour average at each monitor within an area must not exceed 75 ppb. (Final rule signed June 2, 2010.) 9 Dry weight basis (as fluoride ion) in and on forage for consumption by grazingruminants. 10Average concentration ofmonthly samples over growing season (not to exceed 6 consecutive months).

Not to be e1cceeded more than once per year. To attain this standard, the ex:pected annual arithmetic mean PM.w concentration at each monitor within an areamust not mcceed 50 !J:g/m;;7 J To attainthis standard, the 3 year average ofthe annual arithmetic mean PMgconcentrations from single or multiple community oriented monitors must not exceed 15 f::lg/m;;7 To attain this standard, the 3 year average ofthe 98*percentile of2'1 hour concentrations at each population oriented monitor '..vithin an area must not exceed 65**~~;;7** " To attain this standard, the 3 year average ofthe fourth highest daily maximum g hour average ozone concentrations measured at each monitor vlithin an area over eachyear must not eKceed 0.08 ppm. t. The standard is attainedwhenthe expectednumber ofdays percalendaryearwithmaximumhourly

### I~ 3.01 5

### Version 5/Draft#1 February 16, 2011 [][adopted, this wouldamendthe July 1, 2005 version o[Regulation 3.017

average concentrations above 0.12 ppm is< 1, as determined by 40 CFRPart 50 Appendb< H. The 1 hour ozone standard shall be in effect until June 15, 2005. :t To attain this standm·d, the 3 year ave;·age ofthe ammal 994 percentile valaes at each monitoring site must not exceed 150 jlg/m'\ s Dry weight basis (as fh!oride ion) in and on forage for consumption by grazing ruminants. Average concentration ofmonthly samples over grovring season (notto exceed 6 consecutive months).

8ECTIOH 

### 6 lrpplicability ofAmbientAir Quality 8tandards The ambient air quality standards shall apply, be achieved, and maintained in Jefferson County, Kentucky.
8ECTION7 Methods ofMeasurement The air contaminants listed in sections 5.1 to 5.7 shall be measured bythe reference or equivalent methods and at the frequency specified in EPA regulations on Ambient Air Quality 8urveillance (40 CFRParts 50, 53, and 58).
8ECTION 8 8avings Clause Any emission standard established pursuant to Regulation 3.0 11

### AmbientAir Quality Standards section 1.7, 2.7, 2.8, or2.9 that is reflected in apermitcondition as ofJuly 1, 2005, shall remain in effect until replaced with an emission standard establishedpursuant to Regulation 5.21. 

### Adopted v1/4-19-72; effective 4-19-72; amended v2/9-1-76, v3/6-13-79, v4/6-21-05 effective 7-1-05_,_, v!-..!:5:.<.-./**--~~**

### I~ 3.01 5REGULATION 3.01 AmbientAir Quality Standards Louisville Metro AirPollution ControlDistrict Jefferson County, Kentucky Relates To: KRS Chapter 77 AirPollution Control Pursuant To: KRS Chapter 77 AirPollution Control Necessity And Function: KRS 77.180 authorizes the Air Pollution Control Board to adopt and enforce all orders, rules, and regulations necessary orproper to accomplish the purposes ofKRS Chapter 77. This regulation establishes ambient air quality standards to protectpublic health and welfare. SECTION 1 Definitions Terms used in this regulation shall havethe meaning givento theminRegulation 1.02,

### Definitions. SECTION 2 Purpose The ambient air quality standards in Section 7 ofthis regulation establish concentrations ofair contaminants, measured over a time-averaging interval, that are necessaryto protectpublic health with an adequate margin of safety and public welfare from any known or anticipated adverse effects ofthese air contaminants. SECTION 3 Non-Degradation The ambient air quality standards in Section 7 of this regulation are intended to prevent the significant deterioration ofair quality in those areas where the air quality is presentlynumerically equalto or betterthanthe standard. SECTION 4 General Prohibition No person shall cause or allow the emission ofan air contaminantthat would violate, or interfere with the attainment ormaintenance of, an ambient air quality standard. SECTIONS Methods ofMeasurement The air contaminant concentrations listed in sections 7.1 to 7.7 shall be measured bythe reference or equivalent methods and at the frequency specified in 40 CFR Parts 50, 53, and 58 relating to ambient air quality surveillance. SECTION 6 Savings Clause Any emission standard established pursuant to Regulation 3.04 

### AmbientAir Quality Standards sections 1.7, 2.7, 2.8, or 2.9 and included as a permit condition as ofJuly 1, 2005, shall remain in effect until replaced with an emission standard establishedpursuantto Regulation 5.21. '·

1SECTION 7 Ambient Air Quality Standards The following air contaminant concentrations shall be applied, achieved and maintained in Jefferson County, Kentucky:

Pollutant 

# I Maximum

## Con~en~ration 7.1 Carbon Monoxide 7.1.1 8-Hour Average 9ppm\lJ None 7.1.2 1-HourAverage 35 ppm (lJ 7.2 Lead 7.2.1 Rolling 3-MonthAverage 0.15**~-tg/m 3**  Same as primary 7.3 Nitrogen Dioxide 7.3.1 Annual Average 0.053 ppm Same as primary 7.3.2 1-HourAverage 100 ppb (L) 7.4 Ozone 7.4.1 8-HourAverage 0.075 ppm (2008 std) (OJ Same as primary 7.4.2 0.08 ppm (jJ (1997 std) UJ 7.5 Particulate Matter (measured as PM2.5) 7.5.1 Annual Average 15.0 J.lg/mj \ 4J Same as primary 7.5.2 24-HourAverage 35 J.lg/mj \)J 7.6 Particulate Matter (measured as PM10) 7.6.1 24-HourAverage 150 J.lg/m3 PJ Same as primary 7.7 Sulfur Oxides 7.7.1 3-HourAverage


### ----- 0.5 ppm (IJ 7.7.2 1-HourAverage 75 ppb**(~)** 

## ----- 7.8 Hydrogen Sulfide 7.8.1 Maximum 1-Hour average 14 J.lg/m3 (lJ 7.9 Gaseous Fluorides (expressed as HF) 7.9.1 Annual Arithmetic Mean 400 J.lg/m3 7.9.2 Maximum 1-MonthAverage 0.82 J.lg/m3< 1J 7.9.3 Maximum 1-WeekAverage 1.64 J.lg/m3< 1J 7.9.4 Maximum 24-Hour Average 800 J.lg/m3< 1J 2.86 J.lg/m3< 1J 7.9.5 Maximum 12-HourAverage 3.68 J..!g/m3< 1J 7.10 Total Fluorides ('IJ 7.10.1 Growing Season\lUJ 40 ppm (w/w) 7.10.2 2-MonthAverage 60 ppm (w/w) 7.10.3 1-MonthAverage 80 ppm (w/w)
2Not to be exceeded more than once peryear. 2 To attainthis standard, the 3-year average ofthe 98thpercentile ofthe daily maximum 1-houraverage at each monitor within an area must not exceed 100 ppb. (Effective January 22, 2010.) 3 Not to be exceeded more than once per year on average over 3 years. 4 To attainthis standard, the 3-year average ofthe weighted annual meanPM2.s concentrations from single or multiple community-orientedmonitors must not exceed 15.0 J..Lg/m3• 5 To attain this standard, the 3-year average of the 98u1 percentile of 24-hour concentrations at each population-orientedmonitor within an areamust not exceed 35 J..Lg/m3• (Effective December 17, 2006.) 6 To attain this standard, the 3-year average ofthe fourth-highest daily maximum 8-hour average ozone concentrations measured at each monitor within an area over each year must not exceed 0.075 ppm. (Effective May 27, 2008.) 7 (a) To attainthis standard, the 3-year average ofthefourth highestdailymaximum 8-hour average ozone concentrations measured at each monitor within an area over each year must not exceed 0.08 ppm. (b) The 1997 standard

- and the implementation rules for that standard- will remain in place for implementation purposes as EPA undertakes rulemaking to address the transition from the 1997 ozone standard to the 2008 ozone standard. (c) EPA is in the process ofreconsidering the standards set in March 2008. 8 To attainthis standard, the 3-year average ofthe 99thpercentile ofthe daily maximum 1-houraverage at each monitor within an areamust not exceed 75 ppb. (Final rule signed June 2, 2010.) 9 Dry weight basis (as fluoride ion) in and on forage for consumptionby grazingruminants. 10Average concentration ofmonthly samples over growing season (not to exceed 6 consecutive months). Adopted vl/4-19-72; effective 4-19-72; amended v2/9-1-76, v3/6-13-79, v4/6-21-05 effective 7-1-05, vS/4-20-11.

3

# Louisville Metro AirPollution ControlDistrict Regulatory ImpactAssessment Regulations 3.01 AmbientAir QualityStandards 

## Version #5, Draft#1 Proposed, February 16,2011
Purpose ofthe Proposed Action: Thepurpose ofthe proposed action is to update the current federal National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The language ofthe regulation has been generally simplified and the sections reordered. These are administrative changes with no impact otherthan improving readability. If adopted by the Board, Regulation 3.01 will be submitted to EPA for inclusion in the Kentucky State Implementation Plan. Estimated Costs and Savings: The draft proposed action does not change the cost or savings associated with meeting the federal requirements for implementingthe Clean AirAct. Feasibility ofAll Alternatives There are no alternatives available; these changes are required by EPA. Comparison with Any Minimum or Uniform Standards: The District is required to periodically update its regulations to incorporate the most recent federal NAAQS as part of its delegated implementation of the Clean Air Act. There are no changes in the draft proposed action that are intended to be inconsistent with the federal requirements. Report on Public Outreach Efforts: A draft of Regulation 3.01 was sent for formal review to all persons who requested to be informed of proposed changes to any District regulation; EPA Region 4; and the Kentucky Division for Air Quality. 

### In addition, pursuant to Regulation 1.08, 

### Administrative Procedures, the public was provided a 30-day period in which to make written comments and an opportunity to comment atthe public hearing held on April20, 2011, prior to adoption ofthe regulation. Comments were submitted to the District during the public comment period. The District recommended that the Board adopt the following administrative revisions to the proposed draft ofRegulation 3.01 in response to comments from DAQ:• Section 7.7.2, insertphrasing "75 ppb", delete "75 ppm". • Section 7.8.1, insert "14 llf,/m30h underthe secondary standard column, delete "14 IJ.g/m3< ), from the primary standard column. • Section 7.9.2, insert "0.82 IJ.g/m3(1J,, delete "0.82 11g/m3" • Section 7.9.3, insert "1.64 IJ.g/m30l", delete "1.64 

### 1J.glm3" 3(1) 3" • Section 7.9.4, insert "800 11g/m ",delete "800 

### 11glm , insert "2.86 11g/m30l", delete "2.86 

### 1J.glm3". • Section 7.9.5, insert "3.68 IJ.g/m30l", delete "3.68 IJ.g/m3". • Footnote 4- delete "when" after "To attain this standard
...." The Board adopted the recommended administrative revisions at thepublic hearingheld on April 20, 2011. No substantive changes to theproposed draft Regulation 3.01 were made as part ofthe public reviewprocess.Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District Comment and Response Document Regulation 

### 3.01 AmbientAir Quality Standards Version 5, Draft 

### 1- Proposed February 

### 16,2011
Public Comment Period: 

### The following comments were received during the public comment period. Comment: 

### Revise thefollowing:

Response: 

### • Section 

### 7. 7.2, insertphrasing "75ppb ", delete "75ppm". • Section 

### 7.8.1, insert "14 JlfJ/m3(J)" 

### under the secondary standard column, delete "14pg!m3() 

### "from theprimarystandardcolumn. • Section 7.9.2, insert "0.82 pg/m3(J) ", 

### delete "0.82 pg/m3 " 

### • Section 7.

### 9.3, insert "1.64 pg/m3(J) ", 

### delete "1.64pg/m3" • Section 7.9.4, insert "800 pg!m3(J) ", 

### delete "800 pg/m3 ", 

### insert "2.86pg/m3(J) ", 

### delete "2.86pg/m3 ". 

### • Section 7.9.5, insert "3.68pg/m3(J) ", 

### delete "3.68pg!m3 ". 

### • Footnote 4- delete "when" after "To attain this standard
.... " Division forAir Quality 

### The District will recommend that the Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control Board adoptthe suggested revisions. Comment: 

### After section 7.10.3, insert "Odors" underpollutant column; insertphrasing, "At any time when 1 volume unit of ambient air is mixedwith 7 units of odorless air, the mixture must have no detectable odor" under secondary standard column, andrenumber appropriately.
Response: 

### Division forAir Quality 

### The District disagrees with the Division's suggestion to add a new section to Regulation 3.01 addressing "odors." The District's current SIP approved version of Regulation 3.04 includes an ambient air standard for odors that applies to "[a]ny ambient air sample ofat least 50 ml which, undiluted, 

### is established by a documented investigation or measurement to be offensive, foul, unpleasant, or repulsive." 1 

### (Emphasis added). This standard was removed from Part 3 ofthe District's regulations as part of the District's 2005 STAR Program regulatory rulemakings because "odors are regulated in Regulations 1.09, 1.12, and 1.13."2

1 Regulation 3.04, v5 (Aprill988); see 40 CFR52.920 Identification of Plan; Table 2- EPA-ApprovedJefferson CountyRegulations for Kentucky. 2 DraftFinal Regulatory ImpactAssessment (May 31, 2005), p. 8; available at http://www.louisvilleky.gov/NR!rdonlyres/25FAllC4-EC7C-4E09-9CAAEDAOCEC2565F/O/STAR RIA DraftFinal.pdf. 

### 3.0lv5 1 

### April20, 2011Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District Comment and Response Document The Division granted prior concurrence on the 2005 STAR Program rulemaking, including the proposed amendments to the District's Pmi 3 regulations, on April 7, 2005, contingent upon the inclusion of the Kentucky ambient air quality standards for gaseous fluorides, hydrogen sulfide, and total fluorides. 3 Public Hearing: No comments were received during the public hearing. Concurrence: Substantive Changes Resulting from Public Review Process: Comments were submitted to the District during the public comment period. The District recommended that the Board adopt the following administrative revisions to the proposed draft of Regulation 3.01 in response to comments from DAQ:
• Section 7.7.2, insert phrasing "75 ppb", delete "75 ppm". • Section 7.8.1, insert "14**~-t?/m (')"**  under the secondary standard column, delete "14 11g/m3( ), from the primary standard column. • Section 7.9.2, insert "0.82**~-tg/m (1),,**  delete "0.82**~-tglm "**  • Section 7.9.3, insert "1.64**~-tg/m C'h,**  delete "1.64 11g/m3" • Section 7.9.4, inse1i "800**~-tglm 30** **)",** delete "800**~-tglm ",**  3(1) 3" insert "2.86 11g/m ", delete "2.86 11g/m
. • Section 7.9.5, insert "3.68**~-tglm 30** **h,** delete "3.68**~-tglm ".**  • Footnote 4- delete "when" after "To attain this standard
...."
The Board adopted the recommended administrative revisions at the public hearing on April 20, 2011. No substantive changes to the proposed draft Regulation 3.01 were made as part ofthe public reviewprocess.

3 Id. at p. 27. 3.01v5 2 Apri120, 2011GREG FISCHER MAYOR AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY


### Notice ofMeeting StrategyCommittee ofthe LAUREN ANDERSON, DIRECTOR



### LouisvilleMetroAirPollution ControlBoard
The 

### Strategy Committeeofthe LouisvilleMetro 

### Air PollutionControlBoard will meet inthe 2ndFloor ConferenceRoom ofthe Louisville Metro AirPollutionControl District (District) at

### 9:15a.m. onWednesday,

### February 16,2011. TheDistrictis located at 850 Barret Avenue, Louisville, Kentucky. The Boardinvites thepublic to attend. 

### Agenda 

### 1. Call to Order- Recognition ofQuorum 2. Draft amendments to Regulation 3.01 AmbientAir QualityStandards 

### 3. Draft amendments to Regulation 

### 5.02AdoptionandIncorporation byReference of NatlonalEmission Standards for HazardousAirPollutants 4. Adjourn

www.louisvilleky.gov WWW.LOUISVILLEKY.GOVfAPCD 850 BARRET AVENUE, ROOM 205 LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY 40204·1745 502,574.6000 FAX, 502.574.5306Minutes Strategy CommitteeMeeting ofthe LouisvilleMetroAirPollutionControlBoard February 16,2011
A meeting ofthe Strategy Committee ofthe Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control Board was calledto order onFebruary 16, 2011, at 9:20 a.m. inthe second floor Conference Room ofthe Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District (District), 850 Barret Avenue, Louisville, Kentucky. Members attending were Dr. NadirAl-Shami and Ms. BonnieBiemer. A quorum was present. The following District staffmembers were present: Lauren Anderson, Rachael Hamilton and MonicaLittle. Also attending was Assistant CountyAttorney StacyFritze Dott. GuestEmilyMcKilmey attended representing FrostBrown Todd, LLC. 1. Draftamendments toRegulation 3.01AmbientAirStandards, Version 5, Draft 1- Proposed, February 16,2011 Ms. Hamilton said the purpose of the draft amendments to Regulation 3.01 was to include updated language from the most recent standards promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and to incorporatetheKentucky State standards for fluoride. The District also reformatted the regulations to improve readability. The District recommended thatRegulation 3.0I be released for aformal 30-daycommentperiod. Motion: Dr. Al-Shami moved thatthe draft amendmentsto Regulation 3.01 bereleasedfor a formal public 30-daycommentperiod as recommendedbythe District. The motionpassedunanimously. 2. Draftamendments toRegulation 5.02Adoption andIncorporation byReference of National Emission Standards forHazardousAirPollutants, Ve•·sion 18,Draft 1-Proposed,February 16, 2011 Ms. Hamilton said the purpose ofthe draft amendments was to incorporate by reference the July 1, 2010, version ofthe Code ofFederal Regulations into Regulation 5.02 as ofthe date the regulations are adopted bythe Board. Statements Dr. Al-Shami asked how often the CFR's are updated. Ms. Hamilton said the regulations are updated daily but are published in print annually on July 1st. Ms. Biemer asked if it was necessary for the District to revise the regulations annually. Ms. Hamilton andMs. Anderson explainedthe process and stated that it was a federal requirementthat affects the District's permittingwork.Motion: Ms. Biemer moved thatRegulation 5.02 be released for a formal 30-daycomment period as recommended bythe District. The motion passed unanimously. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at9:33 a.m.

Bonnie Biemer

Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control Board Secretary-Treasurer

Strategy Committee February 16, 201 I

## THE COURIER-JOURNALINC. STATEOFKENTUCKY CountyofJefferson


# I,**9/£~** 

## 6)ff;J;

# ofTHE COURIER-JOURNAL,clerk of THE COURIERJOURNALgeneralcirculationprinted andpublished atLouisville, Kentucky, do solemnlyswear thatfrom myownpersonalknowledge; .andreference to thefiles ofsaidpublication, theadvertisementof: Title: Notice ofPublic Comment Lines: 97 

### Date: 2/19/2011 Inches: 1x9.45

Signature ofpersonmakingproof Subscribed andsworn tobefore me this21stdayof Februaryt 2011.



# .t'amtee C@**m'~**

Notary Pubflc, State at Large, KY My commission expires June 14, 2014

## :2;v/

### p-fl~~**·~** 

# ;o**C~tJ.**

# /u£iMr

'lLouisvilleMetro AirPollution ControlBoard Notice ofPubJicHearing and Board Meeting
The Louisville MetroAirPollution Control Boardwill hold apublichearing and its regular monthlymeeting at 10:00 a.m. onWednesday, Apri120, 2011, 1n the Board Room, 850 BarretAvenue, Louisville. The Board invites the public to attend. PublicHearingAgenda 1. Proposed amendmentsto DistrictRegulations 1.15 Version of FederalRegulations AdoptedandIncorporatedbyReference, Version#15, Draft#1; 3.01 AmbientAir Quality Standards, Version#5, Draft#1; 5.02AdoptionandIncorporation byReference of NationalEmission Standards for HazardousAirPollutants, Version#18, Draft#; and 7.02Adoption andIncorporation byReforence ofNewSourcePerformance Standards, Version#l5,Draft#1, whichwere proposed, February 16,2011. MeetingAgenda 1. Callto Order A. Recognition ofQuorum 2. Introductions · 3. PublicRecognitions·
· 4. Approval ofMinutes- Public Hearing andregularBoardmeetingheldonMarch 16, 2011

5. Public Comment1 6. UnfinishedBusiness 7. NewBusiness A. Proposed amendmentsto DistrictRegulations 1.15 Version of FederalRegulations AdoptedandIncorporatedbyReference, Version#15,Draft#1; 3.01 AmbientAir QualityStandards, Version#5, Draft#1; 5.02AdoptionandIncorporation by Reference ofNationalEmission Standards for HazardousAirPollutants, Version #18, Draft#; and7.02AdoptionandIncorporation byReference ofNewSource Performance Standards, Version#15, Draft#1, whichwere proposed, February 16, 2011. 8. CommitteeReports 9. StaffReports A. Director B. AirQualityData C. Enforcement Status Report D. ExcessEmissionReport E. Permitting BacklogReport 10. Adjourn ThenextBoardmeetingis Wednesday, May 18,2011, at 10:00 a.m.

1This is aregularly scheduled agendaitem to give individuals and organizations an opportunityto address the Board onairpollution issues. Presentations shall be limitedto two minutes, exceptthattheBoard Chairmay, for cause, allow three minutes. Persons wishing to address the Boardshall notifY the Secretary-Treasurer(502/574-5218) and submit a completed speaker's registration card to the SecretaryTreasurerbefore 10:00 a.m. ofthe day ofthe Board meeting.· 

# l 

# I 

# l
t

f 

# l I !

t 

# ! 

# I I r IPublicHearingMinutes ofthe LouisvilleMetroAirPollution ControlBoard April 20, 2011
A public hearing ofthe LouisvilleMetro AirPollution Control Boardwas calledto order onApril 20, 2011, at 10:00 a.m. in the Board Room ofthe Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District, 850 BarretAvenue, Louisville, Kentucky, bythe Chairman, Dr. Robert Powell. General Statement,Rules andPurpose The Chairman read the opening announcements, rules and purpose ofthe Public Hearing, which was to review proposed amendments to four District regulations. Ms. Rachael Hamilton, Regulatory Specialist, introduced the proposed regulations and recommended their adoption bythe Board on behalf ofthe District. 1. Regulation 1.15 Version of FederalRegulationsAdoptedandInc01porated by Reference, Version #15, Draft#1 -proposed,February 16, 2011 The proposed action updates the District's regulation to incorporate the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) bychangingthe dateto reference the most recentversion, July 1, 2010. 2. Regulation 3.01 AmbientAir Quality Standards, Version #5, Draft #1- proposed, February 16, 2011 The proposed action for Regulation 3.01updates the current federal national air ambient air quality standards. The regulation also includes several provisions specific to Kentucky. Pending the Board's approval, Regulation 3.01 would also be submitted to EPA for inclusion in the District's State ImplementationPlan. The District received public comments that identified some technical and/or footnote corrections in Sections 7.72, 7.8.1, 7.9.2, 7.9.3, 7.9.4, 7.9.5. The District concurred with the comments and, because the comments were administrative in nature and not intended to be a substantive change fi·om federal law, revisedRegulation 3.01 Version 5 Draft 1 accordingly. Statement Dr. Powell stated the correction to Section 7.7.2 to delete "75 ppm" and change to "75 ppb" sounded substantive, had it not been made in error. Ms. Hamilton said the change to 75 ppb is the currentfederal standard and that 75 ppm was a typographical error. 3. Regulation 5.02 Adoption and Incorporation by Reference ofNational Emission Standardsfor HazardousAirPollutants, Version#18, Draft#1- proposed,February 16,2011 ·Changes to Regulation 5.02 adopt and incorporate byreference the current federal regulations in 40 CFR 61 and 40 CFR 63 published in the July 1, 2010, Code ofFederal Regulations. The District also proposedto adoptRegulation 5.02 on a semi-annual basis, effective as ofthe date the regulation would be adopted. Other changes include clarifYing that sources must comply with NESHAP and any more stringent provisions of the District regulations consistent with the District's prior version of the regulation.One comment was received on the proposed regulation requesting that the phrase "Lead Acid Mattery" in Section 3.121 be changed to "Lead Acid Battery". In addition, the District corrected the section numbers in 3, 4 and 6to conform the proposed numbering and capitalized "From" throughout the regulation. 4. Regulation 7.02 Adoption andIncorporation by Reference ofFederal New Source Performance Standards, Version#15, Draft#1- proposed,February 16,2011 The proposed changes to Regulation 7.02 adopt and incorporate by reference the federal regulations in 40 CFR Part 60 published in the July 1, 2010 version ofthe Code ofFederal Regulations, effective 

### as ofthe date Regulation 7.02 is adopted. Other changes include clarifying that sources must comply with NESHAP and any more stringent provisions ofthe District regulations consistent with the District's priorversion ofthe regulation. Adjournment The publichearing adjourned at 10:11 a.m.

RobertW. Powell, M.D. Chairman

Louisville Metro AirPollution Control Board Secretary-Treasurer

Public Hearing Apri120, 2011Minutes RegularMeeting ofthe LouisvilleMetro AirPollution ControlBoard April 20, 2011
The regular meeting of the Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control Board was called to order on April 20, 2011, at 10:12 a.m. in the Board room ofthe Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District, 850 Barret Avenue, Louisville, Kentucky, by the Chairman, Dr. Robert Powell. Other Board members present were Dr. Nadir Al-Shami, Mr. Ronald Thomas, Ms. Bonnie Biemer, and Mr. Steve Thomas. A quorumwas present. The following Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District staffmembers were present: Lauren Anderson, Rachael Hamilton, Paul Aud, Matt Stun, Teni" Phelps, Cynthia Lee, Eva Addison, Lany Garrison, Matt King, Michelle King, Karen Thorne, Dr. Yiqiu Lin, Steven Gravatte, Donald Fountain, DianaPrentice, Emily Tyler, Rick Williams, Bob Wesely, Craig Butler, and MonicaLittle. Also present wereAssistant CountyAttorney StacyFritzeDott and County Attorney staffmemberTammyBrown. Thefollowing guests werepresent: AndyBattjes, Brown-Forman; Paul Bowe, Marcus Paint; Dennis Conniff, Frost Brown Todd, GLI & ATTF; Tim Corrigan, GLI; Bradley Coyle, Linebach Funkhouser, Inc.; Brad Dillon, GD&M; Carolyn Embry, American Lung Association; Carol Hilton, West Jefferson County Community Task Force; Paul Howard, Terracon; Betsy Janes, American Lung Association; Joan Lindop, Siena Club; Kathy Little, resident of Cane Run/Road Claremore Acres; Wallace McMullen, Sierra Club; Paige Mosser Theriac, Theriac Environmental Consultants, Inc.; Dan Weiss, Duke Energy; and MarkYoung, Automotive Service Council ofKentucky. Approval ofMinutes The minutes ofthe Public Hearing and Board meeting held on March 16, 2011, were approved as written. Public Comment Ms. Kathy Little, a resident and representative for the neighbors ofthe Claremore Acres/Cane Run Road subdivision, addressed District staff and the Board about emissions offugitive fly ash from the LG&E Cane Run coal ash landfill. Ms. Little said-the residents are very concerned aboutthe buildup of ash on theirhome and property, and the health effect on their children. NewBusiness A. Proposed amendmentsto DistrictRegulations 1.15 Version of FederalRegulations AdoptedandIncorporatedbyReference, Version #15, Draft#1**~Proposed,** February 16,2011 Ms. Hamiltonrecommended on the District'sbehalfthat the Board adoptRegulation 1.15, Version of FederalRegulationsAdoptedandIncorporatedbyReference, as proposed. Motion: Mr. RonThomas moved to adopt Regulation 1.15, Version 15, as proposed bythe District. Themotionpassedtmanimously. B. Proposed amendmentstoDistrictRegulation 3.01AmbientAir Quality Standards, Version #5, Draft#1 -Proposed,February 16,2011Ms. Hamilton recommended on the District's behalf that the Board adopt Regulation 3.01,Ambient Air Quality Standards, with the administrative revisions discussed in the Public Hearing on April 20, 2011. Motion: Mr. Ron Thomas movedto adoptRegulation 3.01,Version 5, as proposed bythe District. The motionpassedunanimously. C. Proposed amendmentstoDistrictRegulation 5.02Adoption andIncorporation by Reference of NationalEmission Standards forHazardousAirPollutants, Version #18, Draft#1

- Proposed,February 16,2011 Ms. Hamilton recommended on the District's behalfthatthe Board adopt Regulation 5.02,Adoption andIncorporation byReference ojNationalEmissionStandards forHazardous Air Pollutants, with the administrativerevisions discussed at the Public Hearing onApri120, 2011. Motion: Dr. Al-Shami moved to adoptRegulation 5.02, Version 18, as proposedbythe District. The motionpassed unanimously. D. Proposed amendments to DistrictRegulation 7.02Adoption andIncorporation by Reference ofFederal New Source Peiformance Standards, Version #15, Draft #1 -Proposed, February 16, 2011 Ms. Hamilton recommended on the District's behalfthatthe Board adopt Regulation 7.02,Adoption and Incorporation byReference of New Source Performance Standards, as proposed. Motion: Dr. Al-Shamimovedto adoptRegulation 7.02, Version 15, as proposed bytheDistrict. Themotion passedunanimously. StaffReports A. Director Ms. Anderson addressed the concerns of residents from the Claremore Acres/ Cane Rlm Road subdivisions about emissions of fugitive fly ash from LG&E's Cane Run Generating Station. She reported that the District had investigated the landfill and would continue to address the issue under guidelines in Regulation 1.

### i4 Fugitive Emissions. In addition, Ms. Anderson said the District will seek input from neighborhood residents, the state, and LG&E, and will keep the Board informed on the issue. Mr. Ron Thomas said he lives near the LG&E coal ash plant near Cane Run Road and expressed his concerns aboutthe issue. Ms. Anderson repmted that she received authorization to begin recruitment for two vacant c.ompliance officer positions in the Enforcement section. She also reported that a reorganization ofthe Engineering department, which was recommended by EPA to create a career path for District engineers, was recently approved by Metro Human Resources and implemented by the District. As a result, the following staff were promoted: Steve Taylor, Dr. Yiqiu Lin and Karen Thorne were promoted to Engineer III; and Rick Williams, Donald Fountain and Bob Wesely were promoted to Engineer II. Ms. Anderson thanked Paul Aud, Environmental Engineering Manager, for his diligence with the reorganization.
LouisvilleMetro Air Pollution ControlBoard 

### 2 Board Meeting April20, 20IIMs. TerriPhelps, EnforcementManager, reported on the supplemental environmental projects (SEP) the Board had previously approved as part ofthe Agreed Board orders with Rohm & Haas Company and the University ofLouisville. She reported thatRohm & Haas had submitted a proposal to the District for a SEP to replace the agitator and seals in two storage tanks to reduce hazardous emissions of Methyl Methacrylate by 500 lbs. per year. The project is expected to cost Rohm & Haas $260,000 and the District granted a $30,000 SEP credit for the project. With respect to the Agreed Board Order with the University ofLouisville, the District had allowed the University a SEP credit of$15,000 to produce an asbestos training video. She reported thatthe University hadnotified the Districtthatit would not submit a SEP for an asbestos video, and instead hadpaidthe $15,000 penaltyinfull. Ms. Anderson reported that Carbide Industries submitted a construction permit application to the District to rebuild thefumace damaged duringthe March 2011 plantexplosion. Ms. Anderson reported that the District held a public hearing on April 13, 2011, at Memorial Auditorium regardingthe issuance ofa TitleV construction permitto Nuplex Resins. The public hearing was attended by a number ofresidents from theBeechmontneighborhood and videotaped byMetroTV. Ms. Anderson statedthatMayor GregFischer recently celebrated his first I00 days in office. Mayor Fischer asked several department directors, including the District's, to provide him with information on how they measured performance related to metrics and benchmarks. Ms. Anderson reviewed the information she shared with the Mayor, which included design values used by the District to measure work in air monitoring, permitting, lawn care and newprojects. Ms. Hamiltonreportedthatthe Districtrecently completedthe renewable energyproject approved by the Board in February 2010, to install solar powered generating equipment at the Cannons Lane air monitoring site. Funding for the projectwas provided by a $25,000 EPA Air Planning Agreement grant and $17,859.80 from the District's Air Quality Tmst Fund (AQTF). Ms. Hamilton said the balance remaining in the AQTF fund was $16,376.51 and that a full accounting report of the fund would be provided in June 2011. B. Air QualityData Ms. Anderson repmted the District has applied for resignation of attainment ofthe PM2.s standard and the process was moving forward. Also, she saidthe Thunder OverLouisville event held on April 16, 2011, did notproduce any air quality issues forthe community. The air quality monitoring report was submitted for filing. A copy is attached to the original minutes. C. Enforcement StatusReport The enforcementreport was submittedforfiling. A copy is attached to the original minutes. D. Excess Emission Report TheMarch 2011 Excess Emission Reportwas submitted for filing. A copy is attached to the originalminutes. E. PermittingBacldogReport Thepermittingbacklogreport was submitted for filing. A copy is attached to the original 

### 3 LouisvilleMetro Air Pollution Control Board BoardMeeting April 20,2011minutes. NextMeeting The nextregularBoardmeetingis scheduled Wednesday, May 18,2011, at I0:00a.m. Adjourn Themeetingwas adjourned at 10:55 a.m.

' Robert W. Powell, M.D. Chairman

LouisvilleMetro AirPollution Control Board 

### 4

# akc~

# a-/l,,,j;_
Rachae! Hamilton Secretary-Treasurer

Board Meeting April 20, 20ll

### REQUEST FOREPAACTION
Louisville Metro AirPollution Control District (District) requests a source specific revision to the Jefferson Countyportion ofthe State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the Ford Motor Co., LAP: Withdraw from the SIP the NOx RACT plan approved on October23, 2001 and published in 66FR53684, and replace it with the accompanying PAL/Title V permit. Thisproposed SIP revision is needed because DistrictPermitNo. 147-97-TV (R2) allows fewer annual emissions and contains the remainingrelevant ozone seasonprovisions from the approved plan. For convenience, the two pertinentpages, 4 and 45, follow and may also be found in the enclosed documents.Contents Ford Motor Co., LAP
Request for EPA Action Permit No: 147-97-TV (R2) pages 4 and 45 Board Order Public Notice Cover letter Permit No: 147-97-TV (R2) and Statement of Basis Permit No: 245-09-C (R1) and Statement of BasisPermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) PlantID: 0072 

### PAL!fitleV Permit Revisions/Changes Revision 

### Issue Public Attachment No. Date NoticeDate Type No./PageNo. Description N/A 10/6/2000 4/23/2000 Initial EntirePermit Initial TV Permit Issuance Rl 9/17/2010 7/19/2010 InitiaV EntirePermit 5 year Renewal; Renewal Incorporate PAL, STAR TACrequirements, RO change, DRE for E-coat control device change and 112(J) Part 1 & 2 applications. R2 3/31/2011 NA Admin Pages 43,45 Revisionto include Revision and 50 permit 229-96-0, add NOxRACT language and correctMethanol TankVaporPressure


### Application

### # Date Type 9761 09/09/2004 TVRevision (MultiRequest) 9509' 08/28/2003 TV Revision (Stage II) Request 10016. 07/22/2005 TVAdminChange 10457 07/22/2005 TVRenewal 10789 12/07/2007 TV RevisionRequestDREforE-Coat System ControlDevice 11033 07/17/2008 TV RevisionRequestReporting Revision 11042 08/07/2008 TV 

### IPALRenewal application

- Updated 11230 03/06/2009 112(J)Part 1 & 2 applications 11319 04/30/2009 TVRO Change

SCH Page4 of·130 03-31-2011

### PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) 

### PlantID: 0072

S2.

SCH 

### i. The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from that affected facility
.any gases which contain sulfur dioxide in excess of0.99 pounds per million BTU actual total heat input for combustion of liquid and gaseous fuels. (Regulation 7.06, section 5.1.1) (See Comment 1)
11. 

### See Louisville Assembly Plant, Ford Motor Company Plant-wide Applicability Limit 

### (PAL). 

### d. NOx 

### i. The owner 

### or operator shall not allow or cause the plant-wide 

### NOx emissions to exceed 99 

### tons during any consecutive 12-month period in order to stay below NOx RACT applicability thresholds. (Regulation 6.42)(See Comment 6)


### u. ForEmissionPointsE04A, E04B and E05: The owneroroperator shall not allow or causeNOxemissionto exceed 37 tons perboiler during March 1

### through October 31.
111. 

### ForEmissionPointE02A:

e. TAC 

### No boilershall have a monthly capacity factor greater than 10.0% for any month during the period March 1 to October 31. The term "monthly capacity factor" means the ratio between the actual heat input to a. 

### boiler from fuel combusted during a month and the potential heat input to a boiler form fuel combusted during a month andthe potential heat input to theboilerhad 

### itbeen operatedfor 24 hours perdayfor the number ofdays 

### inthemonth atthe maximum steady state design heatinput capacity.

The owner or operator shall not allow any TAC emrss10ns to exceed environmentally acceptable levels whether specifically establishedbymodeling or derived from defaultde minimis levels. (Regulation 5.01, section 3.) Monitoring 

### (Regulation2.16, section 4.1.9.1.2)
a. 

### PM ·For emission points E02A, E04A, E04B and E05, the owner or operator shall maintainrecords ofmonthlynatural gas and/or otherfuel usage. b. Opacity 

### There arenomonitoringrequirements for Opacity compliance. (See Comment

### 2) Page 45 of130 03-31-2011 f
r. 

### I f 

# I I 

# I I t 

# I ! 

# I
f r 

## [ 

# I 

# I 

# I
f 

### t f 

# t 

# ! 

# I 

# I.·· I 

### Air Pollution Control Board ofJefferson County Board Order

This Board Orderis issuedbythe AirPollution Control Board ofJefferson Countypursuantto the authority granted 

### inKentuckyRevised Statutes Chapter 77 AirPollution ControL Company: Ford Louisville AssemblyPlant (Ford LAP) 2000 FernValleyRoad Louisville, Kentucky 40213 Background and Discussion Regulation 6.42ReasonablyAvailable Control TechnologyRequirements forMajor Volatile Organic Compound- andNitrogen Oxides-EmittingFacilitiesrequires the establishment and implementation ofreasonably available control technology (RACT) for certainaffected facilities that emitoxides ofnitrogen (NOx) andthat are located at a major stationary source forNOx. Section4.4 requires that eachdetermination ofRACT approved by the Air Pollution Control District ofJefferson County (District) be submittedto the U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency (EPA) as a site-specificrevision ofthe Kentucky State ImplementationPlan (SIP). A PublicHearingonthis Board Orderwas heldbefore theBoard onNovember 8, 1999. Based uponthe evidencepresented atthathearing, theBoarddetermined that approval ofthis Board Order and submittal as a site-specificrevision ofthe Kentucky SIP were appropriate. Now therefore be 

### it ordered that: 1. The attachedNOx RACTPlanapplicable to Ford LAP is approved by the District. Ford LAP shall complywiththis plan. 2. Compliance with the attachedNOx RACTPlan shallbe deemed compliancewiththe requirements ofRegulation 6.42 section 1.2, section 1.3, Section 2 to the extent thatthis Section applies to section4.3, section4.3, and Section5 to the extentthatthis Section applies to verification ofcompliance withthe requirements pursuantto section4.3. 3. This BoardOrder shall notbe deemed or construed to bethe result ofany violation of any federal, state, orlocal statute, regulation, or ordinance for any purpose whatsoever. 4. FordLAP has reviewed this Board Order and consents to all its requirements andterms.

- 1 - 

# I ! r


# [ L l fc 

# r
I· t 

# I f·· 

# l I t 

# I I ! l

# I I 

# I I**~** 

# r 

# I 

# I(

.
5. The effective date ofthisBoard Order is January 1, 2000.
Datedthis 8thday ofNovember, 1999.
Air PollutionControlBoard

ofJefferson Cmmty By: 

# F<UvUJit/J Robert

### W. Powell, M.D. Chairman



### Air PollutionControlDistrict

ofJefferson County By: Arthur

### L. Williams Acting Air

### Pollution

Control Officer FordLouisville AssemblyPlant

Approved as to form and legality: AirPollution Control District

ofJefferson County By:

# ~~~t~~z£ Gayl
. 

### dR Ballard Attorney

-2-.:-· f FordLouisvilleAssembly

### Pic...,L
NOx RACTPlan
1. The oxides ofnitrogen 

### (NOx, expressedas N02) emissionfrom each ofBoiler#4 and Boiler #5 shallnot exceed 0.20poundpermillionBtu ofheatinput. 2. FordLouisvilleAssemblyPlant (FordLAP) shall conductan

### ammal performance

### test for NOx foreach ofBoiler#4 and Boiler#5. If

### therequirements ofRegulation 6.42Reasonably Available Control TechnologyRequirements 

### for lviajor Volatile Organic Compound- and Nitrogen Oxides-EmittingFacilities section 5.1 aremet, and subjectto the annual performance test schedulereinstitutionprovision, performancetestingmaybe done on a biennial schedule. Performancetesting shallmeet the followingrequirements; · A. Emissions concentrations andthemass detenn:inations shall be obtainedusing Reference**~1ethods** of

### 40 CFRPart

### 60 AppendixA. Thefollowingmethods shall beused: · (1) Method 1 or 1A,whichfurnishes guidance in site andtraverse selectionfor samplingvelocity attraversepoints in stationary sources, (2) Method 2, 2A, 2B, 2C,2D, 2E, 2F, 2G, or 2H, .which applies to measurements of

### gas volumetricflow rates, (3) Method 3, 3A, 

### 3B, or 3C, whichis applicable for determiningthe concentrations ofone ormore ofthe following gases: carbon dioxide, 0 2, CO, nitrogen, and methane,
. (4) Method4, whichdeterminesthe moisture content in stack gases, and (5) Method7, 7A, 7B, 7C, 7D, or7E, whichprovidesthe analyticafmethodfor determiningthe concentration ofNOx emissions from stationary sources. B. Theuse ofotherReference Methodsthat are addedto 40 CFRPart 60 AppendixA, alternativetests, ormodifications

### to theReference Methodslisted

### in NOxRACT PlanElement (Element) No. 2.A. maybeproposed byFordLAP as partofthe testingplanrequiredbyElementNo. 2.D. Suchmethods may be used ifapproved invv.riting bythe District. C. Performancetesting shall meetthe requirements ofRegulation 

### 1.04 Performance Tests that are notaddressedinthis Element 

### D. A notification ofintentto conduct

## aperformancetest shall be submittedtothe District**~t** least25 working days in advance oftheprojected starting'date for the performancetest. Thenotification shallincludetheproposedtestmethodst9be used. 

### E. Ifa pre-test conference to discuss theproposedtest methods is deemednecessary bythe District, a pre-testconference shall be arranged byDistrictpersonnel. F. Atleast 

### 10 working days' prior notice ofthe scheduled starting date for the performance test shallbeprovided to the District. G. A performancetestreport shall be submittedtothe District ·within 60 days of completion ofperformancetesting. The report shall 

### ill eludethe calculations used to determine emissions. TheNOX emissionrate shallbeexpressed 

### inbothpounds perhour andpoundsper millionBtuformats. The rawdatashall beretainedby FordLAP for

### aminimum of

### 5years andmadeavailable to

### the Districtupon NOx RACT PlanPage 1 --November 

### 8, 1999 

# I I 

# ! ! 

# I ! ' f 

# I
I

# I I I 

# I l
f !Ford LouisvilleAssemblyPI:c..•• request. Selectedportions ofthe·raw datausedto calculatethe emissions shall be included 

### in thereport in a formatprovidedbytheDistrict. 3. Boiler#1, Boiler#2, and Boiler.#3 shallcomplywith the following requirements: A. No boilershall have a monthly capacity factor greaterthan 10.0 % for any month duringtheperiodMarch 1to October 31. Theterm "monthly capacityfactor" meanstheratio betweenthe actual heat inputto

### a boiler from fuel combusted during a month andthepotentialheatinputtotheboilerhad itbeen operatedfor24 hoursperdayforthenumber ofdays

### inthemonth atthe maximumsteady state designheat:input capacity. Themaximumheatinputcapacityprovided by the manufacturer shallbe usedunlessFord LAP determinesthemaximumheatinput capacityusingthe heatloss methoddescribed in sections 5 and7.3 oftheAS:tvffi Power Test Codes 

### 4.1, and B. Noboilershall combust 

### afuel otherthannatural gas, distillate oil, orresidual oil.· 

### 4. Ford LAP shall make a record ofthe type and amount offuel combustedduring each day of operation ofBoiler#1, Boiler#2, or Boiler#3 during theperiodMarch 1to October 31. FordLAP shall, atthe end ofeachmonthduringthisperiod, calculate and record, for each ofBoiler

### #1, Boiler

### #2, andBoiler

### #3, themonthly capacityfactor. Eachrecord 

### shall be maintained for a minimum of

### 5years andmade availabletothe Districtuponrequest. 

### 5.



### 6. Ford

### LAP sha11 keep a record identifying

### all deviationsfromtherequirements ofthis 

### NO" RACTPlan and shall submitto the District a writtenreport ofall deviations that occurred during thepreceding semi-annualperiod. Semi-annualperiods shall run from January 

### 1to June 30 and July 1 to December 31. Thereport shall containthe following :information: A. Theboilernumber, 

### B. The beginning and ending date ofthereportingperiod, 

### C.**Id~mtification** of

### all periods during which 

### a deviation occurred, D. A description, including themagnitude, ofthe deviation, 

### E. If

### known, the cause ofthe deviation, and 

### F. A description ofall corrective actions takento abate the deviation. 

### Ifno deviation occurred dming the semi-animalperiod, thereport shall contain 

### anegative declaration. Eachreport shall be submitted -vvithin 60 days following the end ofthe semiannualperiod; Inlieuoftherequirements 

### in thisNO" RACTPlan, Ford LAP may comply with altemative requirements regarding emissionlimitations, equipmentoperation, testmethods, monitoring, recordkeeping, orreporting,providedthe following conditions are met: A. The alternative requirementsare established andincorporatedinto an operating permitpursuantto 

### aTitle V OperatingPermitissuance,renewal, or significant permitrevision·process as established inRegulation

### 2.16, 

### B. The alternativerequirements are consistentwiththe streamliningprocedures and guidelines setforth in section

### II.A ofWhite PaperNumber 2for Improved Implementation ofthe

### Part 70 OperatingPermitsProgram, March 

### 5, 1996, U.S. · Environmental Protection Agency, Office ofAir QualityPlanning and Standards. NOx

### RACTPlanPage 2 November 8, I999 } f 

# I 

# I I

f 

# l ·f



# I I 

# I l 

# l ! l 

## t ! 

# IFordLouisville Assembly

### PI1u.L
The overall effect ofcompliance with alternativerequirements shall considerthe effect on an intrinsic basis, such as poundspermillionBtu, C. The U.S. EnvironmentalProtectionAgency (EPA) has notobjectedto the issuance, renewal, orrevision ofthe

### Title V OperatingPermit, and either 

### D. Ifthepubliccommentperiodpreceded the EPAreviewperiod, thentheDistriCt had transmitted 

### any public comments concerningthe alternativerequirements to EPA with theproposedpermit, or 

### E. IftheEPA andpublic commentperiods

### ran concurrently, thenthe Districthad transmitted anypublic comments concerning the alternative requirements to EPA nolater

### than 

### 5working days afterthe end ofthepublic commentperiod. TheDistrict's determinationofapproval of

### any alternative requirements is not binding on EPA. Noncompliancewith any alternativerequirement establishedpursuantto the Title

### V OperatingPermitprocess constitutes a violationofthe

### NOx RACTPlan.



### NOxRACTPlanPage 3 November 8, 1999 

# I I 

# I f I 

## I

# I

f ! t 

### l I**~** 

# I 

# I I ' [ r 

### f 

# I l ! '

# r \ 

### 'I'HE 

### COURIER-JOURNAL INC. CountyofJeffel"son 

## MfidavitofPublication Notice ofAction ona1'itleV ·,**Operatl!.l£l,fer.~** . · The**·Loui~vllle** Metr-o Alr Poll.utlon control 01s· trii::t**(D!stri~"t)** proposes to lSsue a Title V op- erating permitto· . Ford Motor Company-Louisv.il!e. · Assembly Pla!1t, 2000 Fern Valley Road, in accor- dance with Reg- ulation 2.16. T!Je 30 day rubllc commen pertad starts June 11,. 2010 and ends on

. July 11; 2010: A

. public heanng. 

### I, MargieWise ofTHE COURIER-JOIJRNAl,**In~.,** 

## clerkofTHE tOURIJ**~i~~ rttt.~hp\~:.** 

## ·· 1 . l . . d d bJ" h d . vill trict determmes 

### JOURN.AI. 

### genera 

## Circu atlon

### pnnte an 

## pu lS 

### e atLoms 

### e, that there are

. germane, u.nr.e· 

### Kentucky, 

## do solemnlyswear

## thatfrom myown

## personal**~ebvst~~~~e;u~:**

### knowledge:~ 

## and referenceto 

## the files ofsaidpublication,. the**~gc~~j:~~~t\.Jig** • "Regulatio!12.07. 

### advertisement of: Drafts.**!·~__!!e** l

# Title:'~ 0-fJ

# ~ Run Date(s): 

# fL/u Jd-.D 10 

## 94.argie 'Wise Signature ofpersonmakingproof 

## Subscribecl and sworntobeforeme

## this

# /1**~** 

# Janice C 

# rR.icfiarcfson permit are "vad• able 

### at the·Pls· trict office, 850 · Barret Ave, Lou·. 

## TotalLines: K '!s.ville between d 8:30 a.m. and 4·30 p.m., Man·**d~y** through frl· 

### T alI h day by cal.lmg

Ot TIC 

## es:

# /x ). Matt Kl ng a 4 t (502) 574-6-7-1 • 

### · = Written c9m-·

. mentswill be·accepted by Matt King, Perml'\:ting Engineering SU· 

## dayofJune, 2010. g . ervisor at the

. istri'ct offlc.<? un- · til 5p.m. July 11, 2010.
. . 

# I I 

# I
l 

## t 

# r t ! ( i

# ~ r I 

# I 1 f f f 

# I i f

# ~ f··GREGFISCHER MAYOR



### Ford Motor Co., LAP Greg Long POBOX32990 Louisville, KY 40232-2990 DearMr. Long: AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY



### March 28, 2011 LAUREN ANDERSON, DIRECTOR



### Enclosed are the approved revised Title V permit P-147-97-TV(R2), the revised PAL construction permit P-24509-C(Rl), and the accompany Statement of Basis, issued by the Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District. These permits include both general and specific conditions, compliance with these permit conditions help maintain a healthy environment for the citizens ofLouisville. The District encourages facilities to investigate pollution prevention. These efforts can save you money, while reducing pollution and energy consumption. For more guidance on identifying opportunities for waste reduction and energy efficiency, please contact the Kentucky PollutionPrevention Center at (502) 852-0965. Please do not hesitate to contact the Permit Engineer identified on the permit at (502) 574-6000 ifyou have any questions regarding the permit or permit conditions. Sincerely, 

# -poJJJCkL Paul G. Aud, P.E. EngineerManager Enclosures: Revised Title V Operating PermitP-147-97-TV (R2) TV Statement ofBasis (SoB)

PA: da Revised PAL ConstructionPermit P-24509-C (Rl) PAL Construction Permit Statement ofBasis (SoB)

www.louisvilleky.gov WWW.LOUISVILLEKY.GOV/APCD 850 BARRET AVENUE, ROOM 205 LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY 40204-1745 502.574.6000 FAX: 502.574.5306

### Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District 850 BarretAvenue Louisville, Kentucky 40204-1745 

## Title V Operating Permit Permit No.: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 Effective Date: 03/31/2011 ExpirationDate: 10/31/2015 Permission is hereby given by the LouisvilleMetro AirPollution Control District to operate the process(es) and equipment described herein which are located at: FordMotor Company-Louisville Assembly Plant 2000 Fern Valley Road Louisville, Kentucky 40213 The applicable procedures of District Regulation 2.16 regarding review by the U.S. EPA and public participation have been followed in the issuance of this permit. Based on review of the application on file with the District, permission is given to operate under the conditions stipulated herein. If 

### a renewal permit is not issued prior to the expiration date, the owner or operator may continue to operate in accordance with the terms and conditions of this permit beyond the expiration date, provided that a complete renewal application is submitted to the District no earlier than eighteen (18) months and no later than one-hundred eighty (180) days prior to the expiration date.

PermitWriter: Shannon Clemons Hosey

# -poJlJ~ Air Pollution Control Officer Administratively Complete: 09/20/2005 and 10/06/2008 Date ofPublic Notice: 07/19/2010 Date ofProposed Permit: 03/31/2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 Table ofContents PAL/Title V PermitRevisions/Changes
......................................................................................... 4 Abbreviations and Acronyms
......................................................................................................... 5 Preamble
......................................................................................................................................... 6 General Conditions
......................................................................................................................... 7 Plant-wide Applicability Limits
.................................................................................................... 16 Plant-wide ApplicabilityLimit (PAL) Specific Conditions
............................................. 16 PALMonitoring and Record Keeping Requirements
....................................................... 18 PALPermitRequirements
................................................................................................ 22 PAL Compliance Demonstration
...................................................................................... 25 PALReporting Requirements
........................................................................................... 28 PALPerformance Testing
................................................................................................. 29 Plant-wide Applicability Limits Comments
..................................................................... 31 Louisville Assembly Plant, Ford Motor Company Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) Requirements
..................................................................................................... 32 STARRequirements
..................................................................................................................... 40 U002

- U004 Emission UnitDescription: Five Boilers
............................................................... 42 U002

- U004 Regulations
................................................................................................. 42 U002

- U004 Control Devices
.......................................................................................... 43 U002- U004 Specific Conditions
..................................................................................... 44 U002

- U004 Comments
................................................................................................... 48 U008 Emission UnitDescription: Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Tanks
................................ 49 U008 Applicable Regulations
........................................................................................... 49 U008 Emission Points
....................................................................................................... 50 U008 Control Device
........................................................................................................ 50 U008 Specific Conditions
................................................................................................. 51 U008 Comments
............................................................................................................... 52 U009 Emission Unit Description: Glass Installation
................................................................... 53 U009 Applicable Regulations
........................................................................................... 53 U009 Emission Points
....................................................................................................... 54 U009 Control Devices
....................................................................................................... 54 U009 Specific Conditions
................................................................................................. 55 UOIO Emission UnitDescription: E-Coat Operation
................................................................... 58 UO 10 Applicable Regulations
........................................................................................... 58 U010 Emission Points
....................................................................................................... 59 UO 10 Control Devices
....................................................................................................... 60 UO 10 Specific Conditions
................................................................................................. 61 UO 10 Comments
............................................................................................................... 67 U011 Emission Unit Description: Guidecoat Operation
.............................................................. 68 U011 Applicable Regulations
........................................................................................... 68 U011 Emission Points
....................................................................................................... 70 U011 Control Devices
....................................................................................................... 71 U011 Control Devices
....................................................................................................... 71 UO 11 Specific Conditions
................................................................................................. 72 UO 11 Comments
............................................................................................................... 79 SCH Page 2 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 UO 12 Emission Unit Description: Topcoat Operation
................................................................. 80 U012 Applicable Regulations
........................................................................................... 80 U012 Emission Points
....................................................................................................... 82 U012 Control Devices
....................................................................................................... 85 U012 Specific Conditions
................................................................................................. 86 U012 Comments
............................................................................................................... 92 UO 13 Emission UnitDescription: Plant-wide Product Fueling
................................................... 93 UO 13 Applicable Regualtions
........................................................................................... 93 UO 13 Emissions Points
..................................................................................................... 94 UO 13 Control Equipment
.................................................................................................. 94 U013 Specific Conditions
................................................................................................. 95 UO 13 Comments
............................................................................................................... 97 U014 and U022 Emission Unit Description: Paint Equipment Cleaning Operation
................... 98 U014 and U022 Applicable Regulations
.......................................................................... 98 UO 14 and U022 Emission Points
...................................................................................... 99 UO 14 and U022 Control Devices
...................................................................................... 99 UO 14 and U022 Specific Conditions
.............................................................................. 100 U014 andU022 Comments
............................................................................................. 103 U015 Emission Unit Description: SealerDeck
......................................................................... 104 UO 15 Applicable Regulations
......................................................................................... 104 UO 15 Emission Points
..................................................................................................... 105 U015 Control Devices
..................................................................................................... 105 UO 15 Specific Conditions
............................................................................................... 106 UO 16 Emission UnitDescription: Final Repair SprayBooth
.................................................... 109 UO 16 Applicable Regulations
......................................................................................... 109 U016 Control Devices
..................................................................................................... 112 UO 16 Specific Conditions
............................................................................................... 113 U016 Comments
............................................................................................................. 117 U023 Emission UnitDescription: Phosphate Operation
........................................................... 118 U023 Applicable Regulations
......................................................................................... 118 U023 Emission Points
..................................................................................................... 118 U023 Control Devices
..................................................................................................... 118 U023 Specific Conditions
............................................................................................... 119 U025 Emission UnitDescription: Twelve (12) DirectHeatExchangers
.................................. 120 U025 Applicable Regulations
......................................................................................... 120 U025 Emission Points
..................................................................................................... 120 U025 Control Devices
..................................................................................................... 120 U025 Specific Conditions
............................................................................................... 121 U025 Comments
............................................................................................................. 123 Permit Shield
............................................................................................................................... 124 Alternative Operating Scenarios
................................................................................................. 124 InsignificantActivities
................................................................................................................ 124 Compliance Assurance Monitoring
............................................................................................ 127 AttachmentA
.............................................................................................................................. 130

SCH Page 3 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 PAL/Title V Permit Revisions/Changes Revision Issue Public Attachment No. Date Notice Date Type No./Page No. Description N/A 10/6/2000 4/23/2000 Initial Entire Permit Initial TVPermit Issuance R1 9/17/2010 7119/2010 Initial/ Entire Permit 5 yearRenewal; Renewal Incorporate PAL, STAR TAC requirements, RO change, DRE forE-coat control device change and 112(J) Part 1 & 2 applications. R2 3/31/2011 NA Admin Pages 43,45 Revision to include Revision and 50 permit 229-96-0, add NOx RACT language and correctMethanol TankVaporPressure 

# I Application # 

# I Date 

# I Type 

# I 9761 09/09/2004 TVRevision (Multi Request) 9509 08/28/2003 TV Revision (Stage II) Request 10016 07/22/2005 TVAdmin Change 10457 07/22/2005 TVRenewal 10789 12/07/2007 TVRevision Request DREforE-Coat System Control Device 11033 07/17/2008 TVRevision Request Reporting Revision 11042 08/07/2008 TV 

### IPAL Renewal application

- Updated 11230 03/06/2009 112(J) Part 1 & 2 applications 11319 04/30/2009 TYRO Change

SCH Page 4 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Abbreviations and Acronyms AFS

- Airs Facility Subsystem AIRS

- Aerometric InformationRetrieval System APCD

- AirPollution Control District ASL

- Adjusted Significant Level atm
- Atmosphere BACT- BestAvailable Control Technology Btu

- British Thermal Unit CEMS

- Continuous Emission Monitoring System CAAA- Clean Air ActAmendments (15 November 1990) HAP

- Hazardous AirPollutant hr

- hour lbs

- Pounds 1 - Liter MACT- Maximum Achievable Control Technology m - Meter mg - Milligram mm - Millimeter MM

- Million MOCS- Management ofChange System NAICS- North American Industry Classification System NSR

- New Source Review NOx

- Nitrogen oxides NSPS

- New Source Performance Standards PAL

- Plant-wide ApplicabilityLimit PM

- Particulate Matter 

### PMw

- Particulate matter less than 10 microns ppm - Parts per million PSD

- Prevention ofSignificantDeterioration PMP

- Preventive Maintenance Plan psia

- Poundsper square inch absolute RACT- Reasonably Available Control Technology SC

- Specific Condition SIC

- Standard Industrial Classification SIP

- State Implementation Plan S02

- Sulfur dioxide TAC -ToxicAir Contaminant TAL

- Threshold AmbientLimit TAP

- Toxic AirPollutant tpy
- Tons per year UTM

- Universal Transverse Mercator VOC

- Volatile Organic Compound

SCH Page 5 of 130 Plant ID: 0072

03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 

### Preamble Title V ofthe Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 required EPA to create an operating permit program for implementation by state or local air permitting authorities. The purposes of this program are (1) to require an affected company to assume full responsibility for demonstrating compliance with applicable regulations; (2) to capture all of the regulatory information pertainingto an affected company in a single document; and (3) to make permits more consistent with each other. A company is subject to the Title V program if it meets any of several criteria related to the nature or amount of its emissions. The Title V operating permit specifies what the affected company is, how it may operate, what its applicable regulations are, how it will demonstrate compliance, and what is required ifcompliance is not achieved. In Jefferson County, Kentucky, the AirPollution ControlDistrict (APCDJC) is responsible for issuing Title V permits to affected companies and enforcing local regulations and delegated federal and state regulations. EPA may enforce federal regulations but not "District Only Enforceable Regulations". Title V offers thepublic an opportunityto review and comment on a company's draft permit. It is intended to help the public understand the company's compliance responsibility under the Clean Air Act. Additionally, the Title V process provides a mechanism to incorporate new applicable requirements. Such requirements are available to the public for review and comment before they are adopted. Title V Permit general conditions define requirements which are generally applicable to all Title V companies under the jurisdiction of APCDJC. This avoids repeating these requirements in every section ofthe company's Title V permit. Company-specific conditions augmentthe general conditions as necessary; these appear in the sections ofthe permit addressing individual emission units or emission points. The general conditions include references to regulatory requirements that may not currently apply to the company, butwhich provide guidance for potential changes at the company or in the regulations during the life of the permit. Such requirements may become applicable if the company makes certain modifications or a new applicable requirement is adopted. When the applicability ofa section or subpart ofa regulation is unclear, a clarifying citation will be made in the company's Title V permit at the emission unit/point level. Comments may also be added at the emission unit/point level to give further clarification or explanation. The source's Title V permit may include a currenttable of"insignificant activities." Insignificant activities are defined in DistrictRegulation 2.16 section 1.22, as ofthe date the permitwas proposed for review byU.S. EPA, Region 4. Insignificant activities identified in District Regulation 2.02, Section 2 may be subjectto size orproduction rate disclosure requirements pursuantto Regulation 2.16 section 3.5.4.1.4. Insignificant activities identified in District Regulation 2.02, Section 2 shall comply with generally applicable requirements as required byRegulation 2.16 section 4.1.9.4.
SCH Page 6 of 130 03-31-2011

### PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 General Conditions 1. Compliance

- The owner or operator shall comply with all applicable requirements and with all terms and conditions of this permit. Any noncompliance shall constitute a violation ofthe Act, State and District regulations and shall cause the source to be subject to enforcement actions including, but not limited to, the termination, revocation and reissuance, or revision of this permit, or denial of a permit application to renew this permit. Notwithstanding any other provision in the Jefferson County portion of the Kentucky SIP approved by EPA, any credible evidence may be used for the purpose of establishing whether the owner or operator is in compliance with, has violated, or is in violation ofany such plan. (Regulation 2.16, sections 4.1.3, 4.1.13.1 and 4.1.13.7) 2. Compliance Certification

- The owner or operator shall certify, annually or more frequently ifrequired in applicable regulations, compliance with the terms and conditions contained in this permit, including emission limitations, standards, or work practices. This certification shall meet the requirements of Regulation 2.16, sections 3.5.11 and 4.3.5. The owner or operator shall submit the annual compliance certification directly to the following address as well as to the District, as set forth in Regulation 2.16, section 4.3.5.4: USEPA- RegionIV AirEnforcementBranch AtlantaFederal Center 61 Forsyth Street Atlanta, GA 30303-8960 3. Compliance Schedule - A compliance schedule must meet the requirements of Regulation 2.16, section 3.5.9.5. The owner or operator shall submit a schedule of compliance for each emission unit that is not in compliance with all applicable requirements. A schedule ofcompliance shall be supplemental to, and shall not condone noncompliance with, the applicable requirements on which it is based. For each schedule ofcompliance, the owner or operator shall submit certified progress reports at least semiannually, or at a more frequent period ifspecified in an applicable requirement or by the District in accordance with Regulation 2.16 section 4.3.4. The progress reports shall contain:
a. Dates for achieving the activities, milestones, or compliance required in the schedule of compliance, and dates when activities, milestones, or compliance were achieved. b. An explanation ofwhy dates in the schedule ofcompliance were not or will not be met, andpreventive or corrective measures adopted. 4. Duty to Supplement or Correct Application

- Ifthe owner or operator fails to submit relevant facts or has submitted incorrect information in the permit application, it shall, SCH Page 7 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 upon discovery ofthe occurrence, promptly submit the supplementary facts or corrected information in accordance with Regulation 2.16, section 3.4. 5. 

### Emergency Provision

a. An emergency shall constitute an affirmative defense to an enforcement action brought for noncompliance with technology-based emission limitations. The affirmative defense ofemergency shall be demonstrated through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or otherrelevant evidence that:
1. An emergency occurred and that the owner or operator can identify the cause ofthe emergency.
n. The permitted facility was atthe time beingproperly operated. iii. During the period of the emergency the owner or operator expeditiously took all reasonable steps, consistent with safe operating practices, to minimize levels of emissions that exceeded the emission standards or other requirements in this permit. iv. The owner or operator submitted notice meeting the requirements of Regulation 1.07 of the time when emissions limitations were exceeded because ofthe emergency. This notice must fulfill the requirement ofthis condition, and must contain a description of the emergency, any steps taken to mitigate emissions, and any corrective actions taken. b. In an enforcement proceeding, the owner or operator seeking to establish the occurrence ofan emergencyhas the burden ofproof.
c. This condition is in addition to any emergency or upsetprovision contained in an applicable requirement. (Regulation 2.16, sections 4.7.1 through 4.7.4) 6. 

### Emission Fees Payment Requirements

- The owner or operator shall pay annual emission fees in accordance with Regulation 2.08. Failure to paythe emissions fees when due shall constitute a violation ofDistrict Regulations. Such failure is subjectto penalties and an increase in the fee ofan additional 5% per month up to a maximum of25% ofthe original amount due. In addition, failure to pay emissions fees within 60 days ofthe due date shall automatically suspend this permit to operate until the fee is paid or a schedule for payment acceptable to the Districthas been established. (Regulation 2.08, section 1.3) 7. 

### Emission Offset Requirements

- The owner or operator shall comply with the requirements ofRegulation 2.04. 8. 

### Enforceability Requirements- Except for the conditions that are specifically designated as "District Only Enforceable Conditions", all terms and conditions of this permit,
SCH Page 8 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 including any provisions designed to limit a source's potential to emit, are enforceable by EPA and citizens as specified underthe Act. (Regulation 2.16, sections 4.2.1 and 4.2.2) 9. 

### Enforcement Action Defense
a. It shall not be a defense for the owner or operator in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary for the owner or operator to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of this permit. b. The owner or operator's failure to halt or reduce activity may be a mitigating factor in assessing penalties for noncompliance if the health, safety or environmental impacts of halting or reducing operations would be more serious than the impacts ofcontinued operation. (Regulation 2.16, sections 4.1.13.2 and 4.1.13.3) 10. 

### Hazardous Air Pollutants and Sources Categories

- The owner or operator shall comply with the applicable requirements ofRegulations 5.02 and 5.14. 11. 

### Information Requests

- The owner or operator shall furnish to the District, within a reasonable time, information requested in writing by the District, to determine whether cause exists for revising, revoking and reissuing, or terminating this permit, or to determine compliance with this permit. The owner or operator shall also furnish, upon request, copies ofrecords required to be kept by this permit. (Regulation 2.16, section 4.1.13.6) If information is submitted to the District under a claim of confidentiality, the source shall submit a copy of the confidential information directly to EPA. (Regulation 2.07, section 10.2) 12. 

### Insignificant Activities

- The owner or operator shall:
a. Notify the District in a timely manner ofany proposed change to an insignificant activity thatwouldrequire a permit revision. (Regulation 2.16, section 5) b. Submit a current list ofinsignificant activities by April 15 ofeach year with the annual compliance certification, including an identification ofthe additions and removals of insignificant activities that occurred during the preceding year. (Regulation 2.16, section 4.3.5.3.6) 13. 

### Inspection and Entry

- Upon presentation of credentials and other documents as required by law, the owner or operator shall allow the District or an authorized representative to perform the following during reasonable hours:

SCH a. Enterthe premises to inspect any emissions-related activity or records required in this permit. Page 9 of 130 03-31-2011

### PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 b. Have access to and copy records required bythis permit.
c. Inspect facilities, equipment (including monitoring and air pollution control equipment), practices, or operations regulated orrequired by this permit. d. Sample ormonitor substances orparameters to assure compliance withthis permit or any applicable requirements. (Regulation 2.16, section 4.3.2) 14. 

### Monitoring and Related Record Keeping and Reporting Requirement -The owner or operator shall comply with the requirements of Regulation 2.16, section 4.1.9. The owner or operator shall submit all required monitoring reports at least once every three months, unless more frequent reporting is required by an applicable requirement. The reporting period shall be January 1st through March 31, April1 through June 301

### h, July 1st through September 30 and October 1 through December 31st ofeach calendar year. All reports shall be postmarked by the 60th day following the end of each reporting period. If surrogate operating parameters are monitored and recorded in lieu ofemission monitoring, then an exceedance ofmultiple parameters may be deemed a single violation by the District for enforcement purposes. All reports shall include the company name, plant ID number, and the beginning and ending date of the reporting period. The compliance reports shall clearly identify any deviation from a permit requirement. All quarterly compliance reports shall include the following certification statement per Regulation 2.16.

SCH "Based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the statements and information in this document are true, accurate, and complete". Signature and title ofcompany responsible official. Ifa change in the "Responsible Official" (RO) occurs during the term ofthis permit, the owner or operator shall provide written notification (Form 9400-A and Form AP-0208) to the District within 30 calendar days following the date a change in the designated RO occurs for this facility. The quarterly compliance reports are due on or before the following dates of each calendar year: Reporting Period January 1through March 30 April1 through June 30 July 1through September 30 October 1through December 31 Note: The date for leap years is February 29. Page 10 of 130 Report Due Date May30 August 29th November 29 March 1 stl

03-31-2011

### PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) PlantiD: 0072 15. 

### Off-permit Documents- Any applicable requirements, including emission limitations, control technology requirements, or work practice standards, contained in an off-permit document cannot be changed without undergoing the permit revision procedures in Regulation 2.16, Section 5. (Regulation 2.16, section 4.1.5) 16. 

### Operational Flexibility

- The owner or operator may make changes without permit revision in accordance with Regulation 2.16, section 5.8. 17. 

### Permit Amendments (Administrative)

- This permit can be administratively amended by the District in accordance with Regulation 2.16, sections 2.3 and 5.4. 18. 

### Permit Application Submittal

- The owner or operator shall submit a timely and complete application for permit renewal or significant revision. Ifthe owner or operator submits a timely and complete application then the owner or operator's failure to have a permit is not a violation until the District takes formal action on this permit application. This protection shall cease to apply if, subsequent to completeness determination, the owner or operator fails to submit, by the deadline specified in writing by the District, additional information required to process the application as required byRegulation 2.16, sections 3 and 5.2. 19. 

### Permit Duration

- This permit is issued for a fixed term of5 years, in accordance with Regulation 2.16, section 4.1.8.3. 20. 

### Permit Renewal, Expiration and Application

- Permit renewal, expiration and application procedural requirements shall be in accordance with Regulation 2.16, sections 4.1.8.2 and 5.3. This permitmay onlybe renewed in accordance with section 5.3. 21. 

### Permit Revisions -No permit revision shall be required under any approved economic incentives, marketable permits, emissions trading and other similarprograms or processes for changes that are provided for in the permit. (Regulation 2.16, section 4.1.16) 22. 

### Permit Revision Procedures (Minor)- Except as provided in 40 CFR Part 72, the Acid Rain Program, this permit may be revised in accordance with Regulation 2.16, section 5.5. 23. 

### Permit Revision Procedures (Significant)

- A source seeking to make a significant permit revision shall meet all the Title V requirements for permit applications, issuance and Permit renewal, in accordance with Regulation 2.16, section 5.7, and all other applicable DistrictRegulations. 24. 

### Permit Revocation and Termination by the District

- The District may terminate this permit only upon written request of the owner'or operator. The District may revoke a permit for cause, in accordance with Regulation 2.16, section 5.11.1.1 through 5.11.1.5. For purposes of Section 5, substantial or unresolved noncompliance includes, but is not limited to: SCH Page 11 of 130 03-31-2011

### PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 a. Knowingly operating process or air pollution control equipment in a manner not allowed by an applicable requirement or that results in excess emissions of a regulated airpollutantthat would endanger the public or the environment. b. Failure or neglect to furnish information, analyses, plans, or specifications required bythe District.
c. Knowingly making any false statement in anypermit application. d. Noncompliance with Regulation 1.07, section 4.2; or
e. Noncompliance with KRS Chapter 77. 25. 

### Permit Shield

- The permit shield shall apply 

### m accordance with Regulation 2.16, section 4.6.1. 26. 

### Prevention of Significant Deterioration ofAir Quality

- The owner or operator shall complywith the requirements ofRegulation 2.05. 27. 

### Property Rights

- This permit shall not convey property rights of any sort or grant exclusiveprivileges in accordance with Regulation 2.16, section 4.1.13.5. 28. 

### Public Participation

- Except for modifications qualifying for administrative permit amendments or minor permit revision procedures, all permit proceedings shall meet the requirements ofRegulations 2.07, Section 1; 

### and 2.16, sections 5.1.1.2 and 5.5.4. 29. 

### Reopening For Cause

- This permit shall be reopened and revised by the District in accordance with Regulation 2.16 section 5.9. 30. 

### Reopening for Cause by EPA

- This permit may be revised, revoked and reissued or terminated for cause by EPA in accordance with Regulation 2.16 section 5.10. 31. 

### Risk Management Plan (112(r)) -For each process subjectto Section 112(r) ofthe Act, the owner or operator shall comply with 40 CFRPart 68 and Regulation 5.15. 32. 

### Severability Clause

- The conditions of this permit are severable. Therefore, if any condition ofthis permit, or the application ofany condition ofthis permit to any specific circumstance, is determined to be invalid, the application ofthe condition in question to other circumstances, as well as the remainder ofthis permit's conditions, shall not be affected. (Regulation 2.16, section 4.1.12) 33. 

### Stack Height Considerations

- The owner or operator shall comply with the requirements ofRegulation 2.10. 34. 

### Startups, Shutdowns, and Upset Conditions Requirements

- The owner or operator shall comply with the requirements ofRegulation 1.07. SCH Page 12 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 35. Submittal ofReports, Data, Notifications, and Applications
a. Applications, reports, test data, monitoring data, compliance certifications, and any other document required by this permit as set forth in Regulation 2.16 sections 3.1, 3.4, 3.5, 4.1.13.6, 5.8.5 and 5.11.7 shall be submittedto: 

### LouisvilleMetroAirPollution ControlDistrict 850BarretAve Louisville, KY40204-1745 b. Documents which are specifically required to be submitted to EPA as set forth in Regulation 2.16 sections 3.3, and 5.8.5 shall be mailed to EPA at the following address: 

### USEPA -RegionIV APTMD -12thfloor AtlantaFederal Center 61 Forsyth Street Atlanta, GA 30303-3104 36. Other Applicable Regulations

- The owner or operator shall comply with all applicable requirements ofthe following: Regulation Title 1.01 General Provisions 1.02 Definitions 1.03 Abbreviations And Acronyms 1.04 Performance Tests 1.05 Compliance WithEmissionsStandards And MaintenanceRequirements 1.06 Source Self-Monitoring and Reporting 1.07 EmissionsDuring Shutdowns, Malfunctions, Startups, and Emergencies 1.08 Administrative Procedures 1.09 Prohibition ofAirPoilution 1.10 Circumvention 1.11 Control ofOpen Burning 1.14 Control ofFugitiveParticulate Emissions 2.01 General Application 2.02 Air PoiiutionRegulation Requirements and MinorFacilityExemptions 2.03 PermitRequirements -Non-Title V Construction and OperatingPermits and Demolition/ Renovation Permits 2.07 Public Notification for Title V, PSD, and Other Offset Permits; SIP Revisions; and Use of Emission Reduction Credits 2.09 Causes for Permit Suspension SCH Page 13 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 1.-. -• ion Title 2.10 StackHeight Considerations 2.11 Air Quality Model Usage 2.16 Title V Operating Permits 4.01 General Provisions for EmergencyEpisodes 4.02 Episode Criteria

--- 4.03 General Abatement Requirements 4.07 EpisodeReporting Requirements 6.01 General Provisions (Existing Affected Facilities) 6.02 EmissionMonitoring for Existing Sources 7.01 General Provisions (NewAffectedFacilities)


### District Only Enforceable: tion Title 1.12 Control ofNuisances 1.13 Control ofObjectionable Odors 2.08 EmissionFee, PermitFees and PermitRenewal Procedures 5.01 Standards for Toxic Air Contaminants and Hazardous AirPollutants 5.20 Methodology for Determining Benchmark Ambient Concentration ofa Toxic Air Contaminant 5.21 Environmental Acceptability for Toxic Air Contaminants 5.22 Procedures for Determining the Maximum Ambient Concentration ofa Toxic Air Contaminant 5.23 Categories ofToxic Air Contaminants 37. 

### Stratospheric Ozone Protection Requirements

- Any facility having refrigeration equipment, including air conditioning equipment, which uses a Class I or II substance (listed in 40 CFR 82, SubpartA, Appendices A and B), and any facility which maintains, services, or repairs motor vehicles using a Class I or II substance as refrigerant must comply with all requirements of40 CFR 82, Subparts A, B, and F. Those requirements include the following restrictions:

SCH a. Any facility having any refrigeration equipment normally containing fifty (50) pounds ofrefrigerant, or more, must keep servicing records documenting the date and type of all service and the quantity of any refrigerant added according to 40 CPR 82.166; b. No person repairing or servicing a motor vehicle may perform any service on a motor vehicle air conditioner (MV AC) involving the refrigerant for such air conditioner unless the person has been properly trained and certified as provided in 40 CFR 82.34 and 40 CFR 82.40, and properly uses equipment approved according to 40 CFR 82.36 and 40 CFR 82.38, and complies with 40 CFR 82.42; Page 14 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072

SCH c. No person may sell or distribute, or offer for sale or distribution, any substance listed as a Class I or II substance in 40 CPR 82, Subpart A, Appendices A and B, except in compliance with 40 CPR 82.34(b), 40 CPR 82.42, and/or 40 CPR 82.166. d. No person maintaining, serviCmg, repamng, or disposing of appliances may knowingly vent or otherwise release into the atmosphere any Class I or II substance used as a refrigerant in such equipment and no other person may open appliances (except MV ACs as defined in 40 CPR 82.152) for service, maintenance, or repair unless the person has been properly trained and certified according to 40 CPR 82.161 and unless the person uses equipment certified for that type ofappliance according to 40 CPR 82.158 and unless the person observes the practices set forth in 40 CPR 82.156 and 40 CPR 82.166;
e. No person may dispose of appliances (except small appliances, as defined in 40 CPR 82.152) without using equipment certified for that type of appliance according to 40 CPR 82.158 and without observing the practices set forth in 40 CPR 82.156 and 40 CPR 82.166; f. No person may recover refrigerant from small appliances, MV ACs and MVAClike appliances (as defined in 40 CPR 82.152), except in compliance with the requirements of40 CPR 82 Subpart P; g. If the permittee manufactures, transforms, imports, or exports, a Class I or II substance (listed in 40 CPR 82, SubpartA, Appendices A and B), the permittee is subject to all requirements as specified in 40CPR82 Subpart A, Production and Consumption Controls. (Regulation 2.16, section4.1.5)

Page 15 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 

### Louisville Assembly Plant, Ford Motor CompanyPlant-wideApplicability Limit (PAL):
FEDERALLYENFORCEABLE REGULATIONS Regulation Title Applicable Sections PermitRequirements Non-Title V Construction and 2.03 Operating Permits and Demolition/Renovation 1, 2, 3, 4, & 5 Permits 2.05 Prevention ofSignificantDeterioration ofAir Quality 1 40 CFR 52.21 Approval and Promulgation ofImplementation Plans



### Plant-wideApplicability Limits Pollutant Tons/Year**



## voc 1,316 PM 21.2 PMIO 21.2 PM2.s 17.2 NOx 99.0 S02 39.33 

## co 151.4 

### ** Represents a 12-month rolling total


### Sl. Plant-wideApplicabilityLimit (PAL) Specific Conditions (Regulation 2.05, section 1 & 

### Regulation 2.03)

SCH a. Under the provisions ofthis PAL, ifthe permittee adds a new emission unit or modifies an existing unit, the unit would not be subject to major NSR (nonattainment or PSD) as long as the PAL emission limits (ton per year limits in the above table) are not exceeded. b. Operational and Equipment Modifications 1) Ford Motor Company Louisville Assembly Plant is authorized to perform the physical or operational changes, or changes deemed consistent with those physical or operational changes, without applying for or obtaining a construction permit or amendment from the permitting authority pursuant to Regulation 2.03 as long as the PAL is not exceeded. 2) The permittee shall maintain a log ofequipment installed and/or modified and the date on which construction and/or modification and operation began. In addition, the permittee shall maintain a log of equipment Page 16 of 130 03-31-2011Permit No: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072

SCH removed from the installation and the date on which it was removed. The log must account for all equipment present at the installation at any given time. AttachmentA, or equivalent forms maybe used for this purpose. 3) If the permittee wishes to make physical or operational changes that are not deemed consistent with the physical or operations changes listed in this construction permit and are not exempt from the construction permit rule, then the permittee must first apply for and obtain a construction permit or amendment.
c. Notification ofActual Construction ofChange: Ford Motor Company Louisville Assembly Plant shall submit written notification to the permitting authority at leastten days priorto the actual construction change to or addition of any emission unit covered by this PAL permit that are not excluded under Specific Condtions S1.h. The notification shall contain the following: 1) Detailed description of the physical or operational change including the effect on existing equipment; 2) A plant layout diagram with representation of existing equipment and physical or operational changes; 3) A schedule ofconstruction activities related to the change; 4) A statement of applicability for any New Source Performance Standard, National Emissions Standard of Hazardous Air Pollutants and /or state regulations not identified as core requirements in the operatingpermit; 5) An emissions calculation sheet for the change; 6) A statement ofverification that the physical or operational change will not result in installation emissions that exceed the limitations stated in Specific Conditions S1.b.; and 7) A summary ofthe impact analysis on the capture efficiency as outlined in Specific Condition S2.i. for those units where compliance with an applicable emission limit or standard is dependent upon the use of the control device. d. Portions of the notification such as descriptions of changes and associated applicability determination shall become an enforceable part ofthis construction permitupon receipt bythe permitting authority.
e. The permitting authority may disapprove any activitythathas not demonstratedto Page 17 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 the satisfaction of the Program to be related to the changes. At the time, the permittee shall cease construction ofthe change until an appropriate authorization ofthe activities is obtained (such as a constructionpermit, ifnecessary). f. Notification ofActual Start-up ofChange: Ford Motor Company Louisville Assembly Plant shall submit written notification to the permitting authority at least ten days prior to the actual start-up or operation of any change listed in this PAL permit. The notification shall contain the following: 1) Reference to the notification of actual construction including date of notification and briefdescription ofchange; 2) Verification that the physical or operational change was completed as described in the original notification; and 3) Scheduled date operations will be commenced. g. It is a violation ofthis construction permit for Ford Motor Company Louisville Assembly Plant to construct, modify or operate the installation not in accordance with the notification Specific Condtions S1.f. h. The notification letter identified in c. and f. above is not required for sources that are otherwise exempt from the requirement to obtain a permit or are included in the list ofinsignificant sources in the Appendixto this Title V OperatingPermit. S2. 

### PAL Monitoring and Record Keeping Requirements (Regulation 2.05, section 1 & 

### Regulation 2.03)

SCH a. The permittee shall maintain 

### a copy of all records necessary to determine compliance with requirements of the PAL, including a determination of each emission unit's monthly and twelve-month rolling total emissions, for five years from the originating date ofsuchrecord. b. The permittee shall retain a copy ofthe following records for the duration ofthe PAL effective periodplus five years: 1) A copy ofthe PALpermit application and any applications for revisions to the PAL; and 2) Each annual certification of compliance pursuant to Title V and the data relied on in certifying compliance.

Page 18 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) PlantID: 0072

SCH 3) Copies ofany notification for any new or modified emission units that is not subject to the requirement to obtain a Permit to Construct under the provisions ofthe PAL.

c. Thepermittee shall monitor all emission units atthe facility in accordance with the specific monitoringrequirements contained in each emission unit. d. Ford Motor Company Louisville Assembly Plant shall submit a quarterly emissions report to the permitting authority within 60 days after the end of each reporting period. The reports shall containthe following information: 1) Identification ofowner and operator and the permitnumber; 2) Total annual emissions in tons per year based on a 12-month rolling total for each month in the reportingperiod. 3) A summary of all data relied upon, including but not limited to, any Quality Assurance or Quality Control data, in calculating the monthly and annual PM, PM10, 

### PM 25, NOx, S02, CO and VOC emissions; 4) A list of any emissions units modified or added to the installation during the precedingthree-monthperiod; 5) The number, duration, and cause of any deviations or monitoring malfunctions, and any corrective action taken; 6) A notification of shutdown of any monitoring system, whether the shutdown was permanent or temporary, the reason for the shutdown, the anticipated date that the monitoring system will be fully operational or replaced with another monitoring system, and whether the emissions unit monitored by the monitoring system continued to operate, and the calculations ofthe emissions. 7) A signed statement by the responsible official certifying the truth, accuracy, and completeness ofthe informationprovided in the report.
e. Quality Assurance/Quality Control: Following completion of the initial performance test reports, Ford Motor Company Louisville Assembly Plant shall maintain an operation and maintenance plan on site at all times. A table ofcontents ofthe plan shall be submitted to the permitting authority with sixty (60) days ofreceipt ofthe performance test reports required of Specific Condition S6.c. The plan should be detailed, specific to the Louisville AssemblyPlant and include the following information: Page 19 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) PlantID: 0072

SCH 1) A preventative maintenance program for avoidance of excess emissions which shall include all maintenance activities, with inspection schedule, repair actions, and replacements inventory. 2) A range ofoperating conditions and outletvariables for normal operation. 3) A summary of operating conditions and outlet variables for all control equipment that will be monitored for malfunction or breakdown and a description of the method of detecting and informing responsible personnel of any malfunction or breakdowns, including alarm systems, lights and other indicators. 4) A description ofthe generic corrective procedures that will be taken in the event of a malfunction or breakdown in order to restore compliance with the applicable emission limitations and permit conditions (e.g. reducing of production rate). 

### f. Capture and Control Equipment: The specified control device (e.g. thermal oxidizer, carbon adsorber, and /or fluidized bed carbon concentrator) must be in use at all times when a control efficiency is claimed for compliance with the VOC emissions limitation. When a control efficiency is claimed, the control device shall be operated in accordance with applicable specifications and with the temperature range determined in Specific Conditions S6. g. Thermal OxidizerRequirements: 1) The operating temperature shall be continuously monitored and recorded when a control efficiency is claimed for compliance with the VOC emissions limitation. The operating temperature of the thermal oxidizer shall be maintained on a rolling 3-hour average within 50 degrees Fahrenheit ofthe average temperature ofthe oxidizer recorded during the compliance test specified in Specific Condition S6. The acceptable temperature range may be reestablished by performing a new set of emission tests. The most recent sixty months of records shall be maintained on-site and shall be made immediately available upon request. 2) An assessment ofthermal oxidizer valve operation and leakage shall be conducted as part of the maintenance and inspection activities, at least annually. h. CarbonAdsorber and Fluidized Bed Concentrator Requirements: 1) Ford Motor shall monitor the desorption gas inlet temperature on the Page 20 of 130 03-31-2011

### PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072

SCH carbon adsorption and/or the SCR temperature on a fluidized bed concentrator unit with an appropriate monitoring device to ensure that the device is operating properly when a control efficiency is claimed for compliance with the VOC emissions limitation. 2) For each carbon adsorption device and/or fluidized bed concentrator unit, the monitoring device required in 1) 

### above shall be identified, the parameters that will be monitored (e.g. desorption temperature), the frequency that the unit is monitored, and the temperature range as determined in Specific Condition S6 for each control device. i. Capture Equipment Requirements: 1) Ford Motor shall evaluate changes that involve em1sswns directed to emission control equipment where compliance with an applicable emission limit or standard is dependent upon the use ofthe control device subject to the change for potential impacts to emission control equipment capture efficiency. This evaluation shall include the following: 1. An impact analysis ofthe change on the capture efficiency; 11. A determination ofthe need for a new capture efficiency test based on the impact analysis; iii. A summary ofthe evaluation to be included in the Notification of Actual Construction as stated in Specific Condition S1.c. 2) Within 180 days ofstart up ofnew projects, Ford Motor shall develop a monitoring plan for each capture system (booth) that: 1. Identifies the operating parameter(s) to be monitored to assure capture efficiency, ii. Explains why this parameter is appropriate for demonstrating ongoing compliance, iii. Identifies the specific monitoring procedures, and 1v. Specifies the operating parameter value or range ofvalues (or the procedures for establishing the values) that shall be maintained to demonstrate capture efficiency is beingmaintained. 3) FordMotor shall install and maintain, for any intermittently controllable work station, a system to monitor when bypass ofthe control device system occurs while the work station is in operation. 4) Ford Motor shall maintain an operating and maintenance log for the capture and control systems (enclosures and thermal oxidizers) for a period of(60) sixtymonths which shall include the following: 1. Incidents of malfunction, with impact on emissions, duration of Page 21 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 event, probable cause, and corrective actions; and 11. Maintenance activities, with inspection schedule, repair actions, and replacement, etc. 111. A written record of regular inspection schedule, the date and results of all inspections including any actions or maintenance activities that result from that inspection. 

### J. Ford Motor LAP has the flexibility to change any oftheir control devices as long as Ford Motor can demonstrate to the District upon request that the new equipment has the same or better control efficiency as the current control devices. The requirement for the same or better control efficiency applies onlyto situations where compliance with an applicable emission limit or standards is dependent upon the use ofa control device. S3. PALPermit Requirements (Regulation 2.05, section 1 & Regulation 2.03)

SCH a. The PAL shall be effective for ten years. The PAL term commences on the date of issuance of the PAL permit (245-09-C (R1)). The PAL shall also remain effective during the periods ofreview ofTitle V renewal applications regardless ofthe status ofthe application orpermit shield. b. Reopening ofthe Construction Permit: 1) The permitting authority may reopen this construction permit to accomplish the following actions: i. Revise to reflect an increase in the PAL as outlined in Specific Condition S3.k. 11. Reduce the PAL to reflect newly applicable Federal and/or State requirements with compliance dates after the issuance of this construction permit. 111. Reduce the PAL if the pennitting authority determines that a reduction is necessary to avoid causing or contributing to a National Ambient Air Quality Standard or Prevention of Significant Deterioration increment violation, or to an adverse impact on air quality. 2) All reopening that increase the PAL level are required to be placed on public notice for at least a thirty (30) day period for submittal ofpublic comment.
c. PermitApplication Submission Requirements: Ifthe permittee chooses to renew this PAL, the permittee shall submit a complete application between six and eighteen months prior to the expiration ofthe PAL. This PAL shall not expire until a revised PAL permit is issued if a complete Page 22 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072

SCH application is received by Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District within the time frame specified. d. PALRenewal Requirements: 1) A complete application shall consist of written documentation and/or calculations for the following item:
1. A proposedPAL level; ii. A list of all emissions units with applicable Federal or State requirements; 111. Thepotential emissions ofall current equipment at the installation; IV. Identification ofthebaselineperiod; v. Baseline actual emissions; and VI. A compliance plan for the proposedPAL. 2) The permitting authority will have the final authority to setthe newplantwide emissions limitation based on the following guidelines: 

### i. Ifthe baseline actual emissions at the time ofrenewal are equal to or greater than eighty percent of the PAL, the PAL may be renewed at the same level. 11. The PAL may not be set at a level that is greater than the potential to emit ofthe entire installation. 111. The PAL shall be adjusted to account for any applicable State or Federal requirement with a compliance date that occurs during effective period ofthis PAL. IV. A PAL level higherthan the current PAL level cannot be approved unless otherwise approved through Specific Condition S3.j. 3) Any request to renew the PAL level is required to be placed on public notice for at least athirty (30) dayperiod for submittal ofpublic comment.
e. A complete application shall consist ofa proposed allowable emission limitation for each emissions unit (or each group ofemissions units) by distributing the PAL allowable emissions for the installation among each of the emissions units that existed under the PAL. Ifthe PAL had not yet been adjusted for an applicable requirement that became effective during the PAL effective period, such distribution shall be made as ifthe PALhad been adjusted. f. The PAL limits for each regulated pollutant will remain in effect until a revised permit is issued bythe AirPollution Control District. g. Any physical change or change in the method ofoperation at the installation that meets the definition ofmajor modification will be subject to major construction permitting requirements. Page 23 of 130 03-31-2011

### PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 

### 0072

SCH h. Ford Motor Company Louisville Assembly Plant shall continue to comply with any State or Federal applicable requirements that may have applied either during the PAL effective period or priorto the PAL effective period. i. Anyphysical change in or change in the method ofoperation ofamajor stationary source that maintains its total source-wide emissions below the PAL level:
1. 

### Is not a major modification for the PALpollutant; ii. Does not have to be approved through the PSD program; and iii. Is not subject to the provisions addressingrestrictions on relaxing enforceable emission limitations that the major stationary source used to avoid applicability ofthe majorNSRprogram. 

### J. Increase ofthe PAL during the Effective Period: 1) If Ford Motor Company Louisville Assembly Plant wishes to alter this construction permit to allow the installation to emit more than the limit of any one of the regulated pollutants, Ford Motor shall submit a complete application to request an increase in the PAL meeting all the requirements for a major modification. 2) A complete application shall consist of written documentation and/or calculations to accomplish the follow items:
1. 

### Identify the emissions units contributing to the increase in emissions so as to cause Ford Motor emissions to equal or exceed the PAL. ii. Determine the Best Available Control Technology (BACT) equivalent controls for each emission unit using current technology. iii. Demonstrate that the sum of the baseline actual emissions ofthe small emissions units, plus the sum of the baseline actual emissions of the new or modified emissions units exceeds the PAL. IV. 

### Comply with the provisions of a current BACT analysis for all emissions unit(s) identified in Specific Condition S3.j.(2)i. 3) The revised PAL level shall be placed on public notice for at least thirty (30) day period for submittal ofpublic comment. 

### k. Operational Requirements from Previous Construction Permits: (See Comment 3) 1) 

### Upon request bythe Air Pollution Control District, Ford Motor Company Louisville AssemblyPlant shall supplyto the Air Pollution Control District a drawing showingrooftop locations ofcurrentprocess exhaust Page 24 of 130 03-31-2011

### PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) stacks. Plant ID: 0072 2) Each stack must be identified by the associated source operation name and a short code that Ford chooses. 3) There must be a unique code for all stacks associated with each new emission unit. S4. PAL Compliance Demonstration (Regulation 2.05, section 1 & 

### Regulation 2.03)



### SCH The owner or operator shall maintain records and emission calculations as described below to demonstrate compliance with the PAL. Further, compliance with all other permit conditions and applicable regulations identified within this permit shall be demonstrated using the methods prescribed for each Emission Unit and for each Emission Point.
a. Emissions calculations to demonstrate compliance with the PAL include VOC, PM/PM10/PM2.s, CO, S02 and NOx emissions from startups, shutdowns, and malfunctions. b. The permittee shall determine monthly VOC, PMIPM10/PM2 . 5, 

### CO, S02and NOx emissions in accordance with the Monitoring and Record Keeping Requirements for each emissions unit for the purpose of summing plant-wide 

### VOC, PM/PM10/PM2 . 5, 

### CO, S02 and NOx emissions and determining the rolling, 12- month emissions for each pollutant.
c. Compliance with applicable emission rates for the e-coat, guidecoat and topcoat systems can be demonstrated based upon the recordkeeping and emissions calculation methods described in "Protocol for Determining Daily Volatile Organic Compound Emission Rate ofAutomobile and Light-Duty Truck Topcoat Operations," EPA-450/3-88-018 (Docket ID No. OAR-2002-0093 and Docket ID No. A-2001-22). The same information can be utilized to determine monthly emission rates for support ofPAL compliance. d. Compliance with annual emission rates for sealer, black-out/wax, glass installation and purge/cleaning solvent operations, and all other VOC emission units, shall be demonstrated using mass balance calculation methods. Monthly material usage data and the applicable VOC content of each material shall be maintained.
e. Compliance with mass VOC emission limitations for sealer, black-out/wax, glass installation and purge/cleaning solvent operations, shall be demonstrated using mass balance calculation methods. Monthly material usage data and the applicable VOC content ofeach material shall be kept. Daily emission rates shall be determined byprorating monthly usage based on dailyproduction levels. Page 25 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072

SCH n VOC Value= 

## S Ui V; (1- 

### Ci D;) i=l Where: U 

### =material usage V 

### =VOC content C = capture efficiency D 

### =destruction efficiency i 

### =number ofoperating days The owner or operator shall correct capture and destruction efficiency values as appropriate to reflect equipment malfunction, downtime or other periods of reduced performance. Daily usage of each material shall be prorated from monthly values based on dailyproduction:

= U PDaily UDai/y Monthly PMonthly Where: Unaily 

### =material usage for a particular calendar day UMonthly 

### =recorded material usage for aparticularmonth Pnaily = recorded vehicle production for aparticular day PMonthly 

### =total vehicle production for a particular month For these operations, the VOC content ofeach material used shall be determined using U.S. EPA Reference Method 24, manufacturer's formulation data, or an approved alternative method. f. To demonstrate compliance with the PAL emission limits, the permittee may use either ofthe following: VOC Emission RateAnnualEmission Calculation (tons VOC/year) (12 month rolling timeperiod)

Page 26 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072

SCH 

### VOC Emission Rate Annual Emission Calculation (tons VOC/year) (12 month rolling timeperiod)

The owner or operator shall update and correct capture and destruction efficiency values as appropriate to reflect equipment malfunction, downtime, or other periods ofreducedperformance. g. To demonstrate compliance with

### plant-wide NOx emission limits and to determine PM; PM10 and PM25 emissions associated with natural gas combustion, the owner or operator shall maintain monthly 

### plant-wide natural gas usage records. Emissions shall be determined using prorated usage rates and appropriate U.S. EPA AP-42 EmissionFactors or vendor emissions data.

n 

### NOx IPMaValue 

## =LViEF(l-Ci)**i~l** Where: a=PM subscript for total PM, PM10, or PM2 .5 U = material usage EF = emission factor C = control efficiency i = number ofoperating months h. To demonstrate compliance with annual 

### plant-wide PMIPM10/PM25 emissions associated with surface coating operations, the owner or operator shall maintain monthly

### plant-wide coating usage records. Emissions shall be determined using materials usage rates, solids content, transfer efficiency and particulate control device efficiency, or some combination ofthese parameters. As an alternative, the facility may rely on stack test data* or design criteria ifsuch data is available and can provide a more process-specific emission estimation technique. *Stack test results used for PM2.s shall not include condensable particulate matter as specified in 40 CPR Part 51.166 as the permit is issued prior to January 1, 2011.
1. The permittee shall complete the calculations specified in S4.a. through h. no later than 30 days after the end ofthe month for which emissions are being calculated. The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control District, 850 Barret Ave, Louisville, KY 40204, no later than ten (10) days after the calculations are complete for the month during which the records indicate that the source exceeds the limitations ofthe PAL. Page 27 of 130 03-31-2011

### PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 

### J. The permittee shall keep documentation of any em1sswn factors used to demonstrate compliance with the PAL. Emission factors must be obtained from the most recent edition ofAP-42, Compilation ofAir Pollutant Emission Factors, the most recent stack performance test results, a mass balance approach using the Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) of all materials, and/or by a method approved bythe permitting authority. 

### k. The permittee shall keep documentation ofany overall control efficiencies used to demonstrate compliance with the PAL. Overall control efficiency is the product of the capture efficiency and control efficiency ofthe pollution control device. 

### 1. Operational Requirement: The permittee shall keep the solvents and cleaning solutions in sealed containers whenever the materials are not in use. The permittee shall provide and maintain suitable easily read permanent markings on all solvent and cleaning solution containers used with this equipment. SS. PAL Reporting Requirements 

### (Regulation 2.05, section 1 & 

### Regulation 2.03)

SCH The owner or operator shall submit a summary of required monitoring reports at least once every three months, unless more frequent reporting is required by an applicable requirement.
a. Quarterlyreport: The reporting period shall be January 1st through March 31, April I 

### through June 30th, July 1stthrough September 30 and October 1through December 31st ofeach calendar year. All reports shall be postmarked by the 60th day following the end ofeach reporting period.
1. 

### The identification ofowner and operator, the facility ID, and the permittoConstruct numbers or any applicable permit-to-install. ii. Total annual emissions (tons per year) based on a twelve-month rolling total for each month in the reportingperiod. 111. 

### A summary of the data relied upon, including, but not limited to, any quality assurance or quality control data, in calculating the monthly and annual PAL pollutant emissions. A copy ofthe data relied upon shall be maintained on site for a minimumperiod ofthree years. lV. 

### A list of any emissions units modified or added to the major stationary source during the preceding six-month period (including exempt and insignificant sources). v. The number, duration, and cause of any deviations or monitoring malfunctions (other than the time associated with zero and span calibration checks), and any corrective action taken. Page 28 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 VI. A notification of a shutdown of any monitoring system, whether the shutdown was permanent or temporary, the reason for the shutdown, the anticipated date that the monitoring system will be fully operational or replaced with another monitoring system, and whether the emissions unit monitored by the monitoring system continued to operate, and the calculation of the emissions of the monitored pollutant or the number determined bymethod included in the PALpermit vii. A signed statement by the responsible official certifying the truth, accuracy, and completeness ofthe informationprovided in the report. b. Deviation report: The major stationary source owner or operator shall promptly submit reports of any deviation from or exceedance of the PAL requirements, including periods where no monitoring is available. The deviation reports shall be submitted within the time limits prescribed by Regulation 1.06. The reports shall contain the following information: 

### i. The identification of owner and operator, the facility ID, and the permit numbers for any applicable permits; ii. The PAL requirementthat experiencedthe deviation or the exceedance; 111. Emissions resulting from the deviation or the exceedance; and lV. A signed statement by the responsible official certifying the truth, accuracy, and completeness ofthe informationprovided in the report.
c. Re-validationresults: The owner or operator shall submit to the Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District the results ofany re-validation test or method within three months after completion ofsuch test or method. S6. PAL Performance Testing (Regulation 2.05, section 1 & Regulation 2.03)

SCH a. Ford Motor shall conduct performance tests on existing control devices in the following table and any future control devices used for compliance with the PAL in accordance with the schedule identified in item c. below.

Control Device Thermal Oxidizer LocationDescription E-Coat Oven RTO E-Coat Oven (3rd Pass) RTO E-Coat Oven (1st and 2nd Pass) Guidecoat Oven (1st and 2nd Pass) Guidecoat Oven (3rd Pass) North MainEnamel Oven RTO North Main Enamel BoothRTO

Page 29 of 130 03-31-2011

### PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072

SCH Carbon Adsorber South Main EnamelBoothRTO South Main Enamel Oven RTO North Main Enamel Booth South Main Enamel Booth Ford Motor shall determine the VOC destruction and /or removal efficiencies and operating parameters ofthese control devices when all the processed controlled by these devices are in normal operation. b. For each capture system, Ford Motor shall: 1) Confirm that the capture system continues to meet the requirements of EPA Method 204 from an approved performance test with no changes to operatingparameters, or 2) Conduct a performance test to determine the capture efficiency and establish the value or range of values for the selected operating parameter(s) when all the processes controlled by these devices are in normal operation.
c. Within the initial 1 0-year term ofthe PAL permit and at least within 10 years of the most recent performance tests, Ford Motor Company Louisville Assembly Plant shall: 1) Conduct performance tests to verify the operating parameters and/or control efficiencies ofthe control devices; and 2) Confirm the capture efficiencies of the total or partial enclosures by Specific Condition S6.b.l) or S6.b.2). 3) The emission testing requirements are designed to obtain representative emission testing. However, it is recognized that circumstances or other reasons may arise that would necessitate changes to the testing requirements. Therefore, upon mutual agreement between the permittee and the District, the testing requirements specified in this permit may be changed. For any control device installed subsequentto the issuance ofthis construction permit, performance tests shall be preformed no laterthan 180 days after initial start-up ofthe control equipment. d. Testing shall be conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in Specific Condition S6.e. Ford Motor shall maintain a record of the results of all performance tests required by Specific Condition S6.a. and S6.b. Page 30 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 e. Proposed TestPlan: 1) A completed Proposed Test Plan must be submitted to the Air Pollution Control District, within thirty (30) days prior to the proposed test date so that the District may arrange a pretest meeting, if necessary, and assure that the test date is acceptable for an observerto be present. The Proposed Test Plan may serve the purpose of notification and must be approved prior to conductingthe required emissiontesting. 2) A copy of a written report of the performance test results shall be submitted to the District within thirty (30) days of completion of any required testing, unless an extension is requested and approved by the District. The extension must be submitted in writing at least ten days prior to the thirty (30) day deadline. The report must include legible copies of raw data sheets, analytical instrument laboratory data and complete sample calculations from the required U.S. EPA Method for at least one sample run. 3) The test report is to fully account for all operational and emission parameters addressed both in the construction permit conditions as well as in any other applicable state or federal rules orregulations. Plant-wideApplicability Limits Comments 1. The Plant-wide Applicability Limit(s) (PAL) are set at levels equal to the baseline determination submitted by Ford Motor Company February 2, 2009 and historical actual emission levels. 2. The PAL permit provisions (under Regulation 2.05 Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality) have been adopted by the Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District (LMAPCD). "Baseline actual emissions" as of a particular date are generally defined as "rate of emissions, in tons per year, of a regulated NSR pollutant, that the unit actually emitted during any consecutive twenty-four (24) month period selected by the owner or operator within the ten (10) year period beginning on or after November 15, 1990, and immediately preceding the earlier of the date the owner or operator begins actual construction of the project or the date a complete permit application is received by the agency". 3. This action will allow departmentpersonnel to identify which source is not meeting regulatoryrequirements, ifthe situation occurs.

SCH Page 31 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) PlantID: 0072 Louisville Assembly Plant, Ford Motor CompanyMaximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) Requirements: 40 CFR63 Subpart IIII- Surface Coating ofAutomobiles and Light Duty Trucks S1. Standards (Regulation 2.16, section 4.1.1)

SCH HAPs
a. The permittee shall choose to comply with one ofthe following HAPs limits:

1. 0.60 lbs HAPs/GACS on a calendar month basis: E-Coat, guidecoat, topcoat, glass bonding primer, and glass bonding adhesive operations plus all coatings and thinners, except for deadener materials and for adhesive and sealer materials that are not components of glass bonding systems, used in coating operations in the paint shop. (40 CPR 63.3091(a)) ii. 1.10 lbs HAPs/GACS on a calendar month basis: guidecoat, topcoat, glass bonding primer, and glass bonding adhesive operations plus all coatings and thinners, except for deadener materials and for adhesive and sealer materials that are not components ofglass bonding systems, used in coating operations in the paint shop. (40 CPR 63.3091(b)) The permittee may choose to comply with the emission limit specified by S1.b. only ifE-Coat meets either ofthe following requirements. (40 CPR 63.3092)
a. Each individual material added to E-Coat contains no more than 1.0 percent by weight of any organic HAP and no more than 0.10 percent by weight of any OSHA-defined carcinogenic organic HAP; or, b. The emissions from all E-Coat bake ovens are captured and ducted to the oven thermal oxidizer which achieves a minimum destruction efficiency ofat least 95 percent (by weight). iii. 0.01 lbs HAPs per lb ofcoating on a calendar month basis for sealers, deadeners and adhesive materials that are not components of glass bonding systems. b. The permittee shall develop and implement a workpractice plan to minimize the organic HAP emissions from the storage, mixing and conveying of coatings, thinners, and cleaning materials used in, and waste materials generated by, all coating operations for which an emission limit has been established above. The work practice plan must specify practices and procedures to ensure that, at a minimum, the following elements are implemented consistent with the Page 32 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072

SCH requirements of40 CPR 63.3094. The permittee shall comply with the applicable workpractice plans at all times. (40 CPR 63.3094) i. All organic-HAP-containing coatings, thinners, cleaning materials, and waste materials must be stored in closed containers. n. Spills of organic-HAP containing coatings, thinners, cleaning materials, and waste materials mustbe minimized. iii. Organic-HAP-containing coatings, thinners, cleaning materials, and waste materials must be conveyed from one location to another in closed containers orpipes. IV. Mixing vessels, other than day tanks equipped with continuous agitation systems, which contain organic-HAP-containing coatings and other materials must be closed except when adding to, removing, or mixing the contents. v. Emissions oforganic HAP must be minimized during cleaning ofstorage, mixing, and conveying equipment. vi. Organic HAP emissions from cleaning and from purging of equipment associated with all coating operations subject to emission limits in Sl.a and Sl.b. above mustbe minimized by addressing: 1) Vehicle bodywipe pursuantto 40 CPR 63 .3094(c)(1)(i); 2) Coating line purgingpursuantto 40 CPR 63.3094(c)(1)(ii); 3) Coating system flushing pursuantto 40 CPR 63.3094(c)(l)(iii); 4) Cleaning of spray booth grates pursuant to 40 CPR 63 .3094(c)(1)(iv); 5) Cleaning of spray booth walls pursuant to 40 CPR 63.3094(c)(1)(v); 6) Cleaning of spray booth equipment pursuant to 40 CPR 63.3094(c)(1)(vi); 7) Cleaning of external spray booth areas pursuant to 40 CPR 63.3094(c)(1)(vii); 8) Additional housekeeping measures pursuant to 40 CPR 63 .3094(c)(1)(viii). The permittee may choose to comply with an alternative to the work practice standard, after receiving prior approval from the US EPA in accordance with 40 CPR 63.6(g). (40 CFR 63.3100(c), 40 CPR 63.4493(b), and (c)), (40 CFR 63.094(d))
c. Revisions to the work practice plan likewise do not represent revisions to the facility's Renewable Operating Permit. Copies ofthe current work practice plan and any earlier plan developed within the past five years are required to be made available for inspection and copying by the LMAPCD upon request. (40 CPR 63.3094)(e)(f)) d. For any coating operation(s) for which HAP emission reductions due to the use of add-on control equipment are relied upon to demonstrate compliance with the Page 33 of 130 03-31-2011

### PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 emission limits above, the permittee shall meet the operating limits specified in Table 1 of40 CFR 63 Subpart IIII 

### as identified below. The operating limits in Table 1 apply to the emission capture and add-on control systems on the coating operations. The permittee must establish the operating limits during the performance test according to the requirements in 40 CFR 63.3167. The operating limits shall be met at all times after they are established, except for periods of startup, shutdown and malfunction. (40 CFR 63.3093, 40 CFR 63.3100(b), (d) and Table 1)

Add-On Control Operating Limit Device 

### The average combustion temperature in any 3-hour Thermal Oxidizer period must not fall belowthe combustion temperature limit established according to 40 CFR 63.3167(a). Concentrators, The average desorption gas inlettemperature in any 3- Including Zeolite Wheels and Rotary hour period must not fall belowthe limit established Carbon Adsorbers according to 40 CFR 63.3167(e). S2. Monitoring 

### (Regulation 2.16, section 4.1.1)

SCH a. For any coating operation(s) for which HAP 

### emission reductions due to the use of add-on control equipment are relied upon to demonstrate compliance with the emission limits above, the permittee shall develop and implement a written startup, shutdown and malfunction plan (SSMP) in accordance with 40 CFR 63.6(e)(3) and submit to the District. This plan must address the startup, shutdown and corrective actions in the event of a malfunction of any emission capture system or add-on control device upon which compliance with any ofthe emission limits above depends. The SSMP must also address any coating operation equipment that may cause increased emissions or that would affect capture efficiency ifthe process equipment malfunctions, such as conveyors that move parts among enclosures. (40 CFR 63.3100(±)) b. For any coating operation(s) for which HAP 

### emission reductions due to the use of add-on control equipment are relied upon to demonstrate compliance with the emission limits above, the permittee shall operate and maintain all affected emission units including any emission capture system or add-on control device upon which compliance with any of the emission limits above. At all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, the owner or operator must operate and maintain any affected source, including associated air pollution control equipment and monitoring equipment, in a manner consistent with safety and good air pollution control practices for minimizing emissions. During a period of startup, shutdown, or malfunction, this general duty to minimize emissions requires that the owner or operator reduce emissions from the affected source to the greatest extent which is consistent with safety and good air pollution control practices. The general duty to minimize emissions during a period of Page 34 of 130 03-31-2011

### Permit No: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 startup, shutdown, or malfunction does not require the owner or operator to achieve emission levels that would be required by the applicable standard at other times ifthis is not consistent with safety and good air pollution control practices, nor does it require the owner or operator to make any further efforts to reduce emissions if levels required by the applicable standard have been achieved. Determination ofwhether such operation and maintenance procedures are being used will be based on information available to the Administrator which may include, but is not limited to, monitoring results, review of operation and maintenance procedures, review of operation and ·maintenance records, and inspection ofthe source. (40 CFR 63.3100(d))
c. For any coating operation(s) for which HAP emission reductions due to the use of add-on control equipment are relied upon to demonstrate compliance with the emission limits above, the permittee shall maintain a log detailing the operation and maintenance of any emission capture system, add-on control device, or continuous parameter monitor upon which compliance with any ofthe emission limits above depends. The log shall cover the period between the compliance date specified in 40 CFR 63.3083 and the date when the initial emission capture system and add-on control device performance tests have been completed, as specified in 40 CFR 63.3160. (40 CFR 63.3100(e)) S3. Recordkeeping 

### (Regulation 2.16, section 4.1.1)

SCH Records required in this section shall be maintained on file for a period offive years. (40 CFR 63.3131) The permittee shall maintain, at a minimum, the following records as of the applicable compliance date:
a. A copy ofeach notification and report that is submitted to comply with 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart IIII and the documentation supporting each notification and report as specified in 40 CFR 63.3130(a). (40 CFR 63.3130(a)). b. A current copy ofinformation provided by materials suppliers or manufacturers, such as manufacturer's formulation data, or test data used to determine the mass fraction of organic HAP for each coating, thinner and cleaning material, the density for each coating and thinner, and the volume fraction ofcoating solids for each coating. (40 CFR 63.3130(b)).
c. Monthlyrecords ofthe following: i. For each coating or thinner used in E-Coat, guidecoat, topcoat, glass bonding primer, and glass bonding adhesive operations plus all coatings and thinners, the volume used in each month, the mass fraction organic HAP content, the density, and the volume fraction of solids. (40 CFR 63.3130(c)(1))
Page 35 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072

SCH ii. For each deadener material, and NOB Sealers and Adhesives used, the mass used in each month and the mass organic HAP content. (40 CFR 63.3130(c)(3)) 111. Calculations ofthe organic HAP emission rate for E-Coat, guidecoat, and topcoat in pounds per gallon of applied coating solids. If permittee chooses to comply with the option identified in l.ii, a record ofthe weight fraction of each organic HAP in each material added to E-Coat. These calculations and records must include raw data, algorithms, and intermediate calculations. Ifthe "Protocolfor Determining Daily Volatile Organic Compound Emission Rate ofAutomobile and Light-Duty Truck Topcoat Operations," EPA-450/3-88-018 (Docket ID No. OAR-2002 0093 and Docket ID No. A-2001-22), is used, all data input to this protocol must be recorded. Ifthese data are maintained as electronic files, the electronic files, as well as any paper copies must be maintained. ( 40 CPR 63.3130(c)(4), 40 CFR 63.3163,40 CFR 63.3173) iv. Calculation ofthe average monthly mass organic HAP content in pounds per pound ofcoating, separately for deadener materials and NOB Sealers and Adhesives. (40 CFR 63.3130(c)(5), 40 CFR 63.3152) v. The name, volume, mass fraction organic HAP content and density of each cleaningmaterial used. (40 CFR 63.3130(6)(d)- (f)) d. Any additional records pertaining to deviations; startup, shutdown or malfunctions; emission capture systems; performance testing; capture and control efficiency determinations; transfer efficiency determinations; and work practice plans for any emission capture system or add-on control device upon which compliance with any ofthe emission limits in I.1 through 4 depends, pursuant to 40 CFR 63.3130(g) through (n). (40 CFR 63.3130(6)(g)- (n)) i. Records pertaining to the design and operation ofcontrol and monitoring systems for any emission capture system or add-on control device upon which compliance with any of the emission limits in SC I.1 through 4 depends must be maintained on-site for the life of the equipment in a location readily available to plant operators and inspectors. (40 CFR 63.3130(o)(6)) ii. The permittee shall compile all required records and complete all required calculations in a format acceptable to the Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District and make them available by the end ofthe calendar month following each compliance period unless otherwise specified in any monitoring/recordkeeping condition. iii. The permittee may rely upon the results ofcapture, destruction or transfer efficiencytests that have beenpreviously conductedupon written approval from the District. Any suchprevious tests must meet the criteria identified in 40 CFR 63.3160(c)(1) through (3). (40 CFR 63.3160) iv. The permittee shall install, operate and maintain each continuous parametric monitoring system in accordance with the applicable provisions of40 CFR 63.3168. (40 CFR 63.3168) Page 36 of 130 03-31-2011

### PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072

SCH v. The permittee shall demonstrate continuous compliance with the operating limits specified in Table 1 to Subpart IIII of Part 63 for any emission capture system or add-on control device upon which compliance with any of the emission limits in the above table depends, pursuant to 40 CFR 63.3163 and 40 CFR 63.3173 using the method(s) described below: ( 40 CFR 63.3163, 40 CFR 63.3173 and Table 1) Add-On Control Operating Limit: Continuous Compliance Device: Demonstration Method 

### a. Collectthe combustion The average combustion temperature data according temperature in any 3- to 40 CFR 63.3168(c); hour periodmust not fall b. Reduce the data to 3-hour Thermal Oxidizer belowthe combustion block averages; and temperature limit c. Maintainthe 3-hour established accordingto average combustion 40 CFR 63.3167(a). temperature at or above temperature limit. a. Collectthe temperature Concentrators, The average desorption data according to 40 CFR Including Zeolite gas inlettemperature in 63 .3168(f); Wheels and any 3-hourperiod must b. Reduce the datato 3-hour Rotary Carbon not fall below the limit block averages; and Adsorbers established accordingto c. Maintain the 3-hour 40 CFR 63.3167(e). average temperature at or above the temperature limit.
IX. 

### For any coating operation(s) for which HAP 

### emission reductions due to the use of add-on control equipment are relied upon to demonstrate compliance with the emission limits above, the permittee shall monitor or secure the valve or closure mechanism controlling each bypass line for each capture system upon which compliance with any of the emission limits in the table above depends in a non-bypass mode such that the valve or closure mechanism cannot be opened without creating a record that it was opened. The method used to monitor or secure the valve or closure mechanism must meet one ofthe following: (40 CFR 63.3168(b)(1)) 1. Flow control position indicator requirements pursuant to 40 CFR 63.3168(b)(1)(i); 2. Car-seal or lock-and-key valve closures requirements pursuant to 40 CFR 63.3168(b)(1)(ii); 3. Valve closure monitoring requirements pursuant to 40 CFR 63.3168(b)(I

### )(iii); Page 37 of 130 03-31-2011

### Permit No: 147-97-TV (R2) 

### 4. Plant ID: 0072 Automatic shutdown system requirements pursuant to 40 CFR 63.3168(b)(1)(iv). Ifany bypass line is opened, a description ofwhy the line was opened and the length oftime itremained open must be included in the semi-annual compliance reports required in 40 CFR 63.3168(b) S4. Reporting 

### (Regulation 2.16, section 4.1.1)
a. The permittee shall submit applicable notifications specified in 40 CFR 63;7(b) and (c), 63.8(±)(4) and 63.9(b) through (e) and (h), as specified in 40 CFR 63.3110. (40 CFR Part 63, Subparts A and IIII) 

### b. For any emission capture system or add-on control device upon which compliance with any ofthe emission limits in the above table depends, for which a startup, shutdown, or malfunction occurs during the quarterly reporting period, the permittee shall submit a SSMP report as specified in 40 CFR 63.3120(c). (40 CFR 63. 3120(c), 40 CFR 63.10(d)) S5. Testing 

### (Regulation 2.16, section 4.1.1)

SCH a. The permittee shall perform the applicable performancetests and compliance demonstrations in accordance with 40 CFR 63.3150-3152,40 CFR 63.3160-3161, 40 CFR 63.3163-3168, 40 CFR 63.3170-3171, and 40 CFR 63.3173. (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart IIII) b. The permittee shall determine the mass fraction of each organic HAP for each material used according to the procedures established under 40 CFR 63.3151(a)(l) through (5). The permittee may use US EPA Method ALT-017 as an alternative for any material used, after demonstrating that its use as an alternative test methodology for that material, has been approved by the US EPA pursuantto the requirements of40 CFR 63.3151(a)(3) and 40 CFR 63.7. (40 CFR 63.7, 40 CFR 63.3151)
c. For any emission capture system or add-on control device upon which compliance with any of the emission limits in the above table depends, the permittee shall submit all performance test reports for emission capture systems and add-on control devices, and reports of transfer efficiency tests as required by 40 CFR 63.3120(b). (40 CFR 63.3120(b))

Page 38 of 130 03-31-2011

### PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 40 CFR 63 Subpart EEEE- Organic Liquids Distribution Operations (OLD) 

### In the event that the permittee changes the materials in an existing affected storage tank that contains an organic liquid is equal to or greater than 5,000 gallons in such a way that the annual average true vapor pressure ofthe total organic hazardous air pollutant is above 4.0 psia, the permittee shall be subject to additional requirements pursuant to 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart EEEE and shall ensure compliance with those requirements. (40 CFR 63.2346)
a. For each existing affected storage tank that contains an organic liquid with a capacity of less than 5,000 gallons, records must be kept ofthe identity ofthe tank and the capacity ofthe tank (in gallons). Affected tanks are those tanks that contain organic liquid with a HAP content of5 percent or greater by weight, as defined under 40 CFR §63.2406 and Table 1of40 CFRPart 63 SubpartEEEE. 63.2343(a) b. For each existing affected storage tank that contains an organic liquid with a capacity of more than 5,000 gallons and contains an organic liquid with a HAP content of5 percent or greater by weight, the following records must be kept: i. The identity ofthe tank and the capacity ofthe tank (in gallons), 11. 

### The tank contents iii. The annual average true vaporpressure ofthe total organic hazardous air pollutant in the organic liquid (as defined under 40 CFR §63.2406 and Table 1 of40 CFR Part 63 SubpartEEEE). (40 CFR 63.2343(b))
c. These records must be kept up-to-date and available for inspection. (40 CFR 63.2343) d. All compliance records, notifications and reports, and any updates to those records, shall be retained for five years with two years ofrecords on site. (40 CFR 63.2394(b) and (c)) OLD MACT Reporting Requirements


### a. For each existing affected storage tank that has a capacity ofmore than 5,000 gallons, the permittee must submit an Initial Compliance Report 

### that contains the following information (40 CFR 63.2343(b) and 63.2386):

SCH 1. 

### Company name and address. 11. 

### Statement by a responsible official, including the official's name, title and signature, certifying that, based on information and beliefformed after reasonable inquiry, the statements and information in the report are true, accurate and complete. 111. 

### A listing of all existing affected storage tanks greater than 5,000 gallons that contain an organic liquid where the annual average true vaporpressure ofthe total organic hazardous air pollutant (as defined under Table 1 of 40 CFR Part 63 SubpartEEEE) is below 4.0 psia.
Page 39 of 130 03-31-2011

### PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 b. The permittee must submit a subsequent Compliance Report if any of the following occurs (40 CFR 63.2343(b)(2)(i)):
1. 

### The permittee changes the materials in an existing affected storage tank that has a capacity equal to or greater than 5,000 gallons in such a way that the annual average true vapor pressure ofthe total organic hazardous air pollutant is above 4.0 psia. ii. The permittee installs a new affected storage tank with a capacity equal to or greater than 5,000 gallons. 111. 

### There are changes to the information reported.
c. Each subsequent Compliance Report shall be submitted with the next Title V semi-annual report. (40 CFR 63.2386(e)) 40 CFR63 Subpart ZZZZ- 

### National Emissions Standards for Hazardous AirPollutants for StationaryReciprocating Internal Combustion Engines There are no applicable requirements or notification requirements under Subpart ZZZZ as all of the units are considered existing emergency generators less than 500 HP. An existing emergency stationary RICE does not have to meet the requirements ofthis subpart and subpartA ofthis part. No initial notification is necessary. (40 CFR 64.6590(b)(3)
General Permit Reporting Requirements 

### (Regulation 2.16, section 4.1.9.3) The owner or operator shall report quarterlythe following:
a. Emission Unit ID number and Control ID number; b. The beginning and ending date ofthe repmiingperiod; c. Identification ofthe operatingparameters being monitored; d. Number, duration, and cause ofall exceedances (or anegative declaration, ifnone); and e. Description ofthe corrective action taken for each exceedance. STARRequirements:
DISTRICT ONLY ENFORCEABLE REGULATIONS Regulation Title Applicable Sections 

### 5.01 General Provisions 1through 4 Methodology for DeterminingBenchmark 5.20 Ambient Concentration ofa Toxic Air 1

### through 6 Contaminant 5.21 Environmental Acceptabilityfor Toxic Air 1

### through 5 Contaminants SCH Page 40 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 DISTRICT ONLY ENFORCEABLE REGULATIONS Regulation Title Applicable Sections Procedures for Determiningthe Maximum 5.22 Ambient Concentration ofa Toxic Air 1through 5 Contaminant 5.23 Categories ofToxic Air Contaminants 1through 6

a. The owner or operator shall submit with the notification of construction for any new emission unit the STAR EA Demonstration for all Category 1 through Category 4 TACs emitted from that emission unit. b. The owner or operator shall submit aplant-wide emissions-based EA Demonstration to the District showing compliance with theplant-wide EA goals of 7.5 new and existing, 3.8 for all new combined, and 1 for each process when a change occurs that increases emissions above De minimus orpreviously modeled values.
c. If the TAC does not have an established BAC or De minimus value, the owner or operator shall calculate and report these values. The following form may be used for determining BAC and De minimus values:

SCH http://www.louisvilleky.gov/NR/rdonlyres/121AAADA-9838-4057-ADFC88CD95A14937 /0/BAC Worksheet.pdf

Page 41 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 U002- U004 Emission Unit Description: Five Boilers U002 - U004 Applicable Regulations:
FEDERALLY ENFORCEABLE REGULATIONS Applicable Regulation Title Sections 6.42 Reasonable Available Control Technology 1.2, and 2 Requirements for Major Volatile Organic Compound through 5 6.07 Standards ofPerformance for Existing Indirect Heat 1through 4 Exchangers 7.06 Standards ofPerformance for NewIndirect Heat 1through 5 Exchangers 40 CFR 60 General Provisions 60.1 through SubpartA 60.18 40 CFR 60 Standards ofPerformance for Small Industrial- 60.48c Subpart De Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units
District Only Enforceable Regulations Regulation Title Applicable Sections Methodology for DeterminingBenchmark 5.20 Ambient Concentration ofa Toxic Air 1through 6 Contaminant 5.21 Environmental Acceptability for Toxic Air 1through 5 Contaminants Procedures for Determiningthe Maximum 5.22 Ambient Concentration ofa Toxic Air 1through 5 Contaminant 5.23 Categories ofToxic Air Contaminants 1through 6 7.02 Federal New Source Performance Standards 1.23, 2 through 5 Incorporated byReference

SCH Page 42 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) U002 - U004 Emission Points: U002- U004 Equipment

Emission Description

Point One (1) powerhouse Wickes boiler; rated at E02A 146 MMBtu/hr; installed in 1954; natural gas-fired withpropane backup.

One (1) Cleaver-Brooks dockboiler (No. 1); E04A rated at 63.6 MMBtu/hr; installed in 1995; natural gas-fired withpropanebackup.

One (1) Cleaver-Brooks boiler (No.2); 63.6 E04B MMBtu/hr, installed 1995; natural gas-fired, withpropane backup.

E05 Two (2) hotwaterboilers; 33.5 MMBtu/hr, installed 1996; natural gas-fired PlantID: 0072

Applicable Control Regulation ID 6.07 5.21 NA 6.42 7.06 5.21 N/A 6.42 40 CFR 60 SubpartDe 7.06 5.21 N/A 6.42 40 CFR 60 SubpartDC 7.06 5.21 N/A 40 CFR 60 SubpartDC U002 - U004 Control Devices: There are no control devices associated with Emission Unit U002

- U004.

SCH Page 43 of 130 03-31-2011

### PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 U002- U004 Specific Conditions S1. ·Standards (Regulation 2.16, section 4.1.1)

SCH a. PM
1. 

### ForEmission PointE02A: The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from that affected facility particulate matter in excess of 0.30 pounds per million BTU actual total heat input. (Regulation 6.07, section 4.1) (See Comment 1) ii. ForEmissionPoints E04A, E04B and E05: The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from that affected facility particulate matter in excess of 0.29 pounds per million BTU actual total heat input. (Regulation 7.06, section 4.1.4) (See Comment 1) iii. See Louisville Assembly Plant, Ford Motor Company Plant-wide Applicability Limit (PAL) b. Opacity
1. 

### For indirect heat exchangers subject to Regulation 6.07 and 7.06, the owner or operator shall not allow or cause the particulate emissions into the open air from any indirect heat exchanger which is greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity exceptfor:
11. 

### For indirect heat exchangers with a heat input capacity of less than 250 million BTU/hr, a maximum of40% opacity shall be permissible for not more than two consecutive minutes in any 60 consecutive minutes;

111. 

### For indirect heat exchangers with heat input capacity of less than 250 million BTU/hr, a maximum of40% opacity shall be permissible for not more than six consecutive minutes in any 60 consecutive minutes during cleaningthe fire box or blowing soot; or
IV. 

### For emissions from an indirect heat exchanger during building a new fire for the period required to bring the boiler up to operating conditions provided the method used is that recommended by the manufacturer and the time does not exceed the manufacturer's recommendations. (Regulation 7.06, section 4.2)

Page 44 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) PlantID: 0072 i. The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from that affected facility any gases which contain sulfur dioxide in excess of 0.99 pounds per million BTU actual total heat input for combustion of liquid and gaseous fuels. (Regulation 7.06, section 5.1.1) (See Comment 1) ii. See Louisville Assembly Plant, Ford Motor Company Plant-wide Applicability Limit CPAL). d. NOx
1. The owner or operator shall not allow or cause the plant-wide NOx emissions to exceed 99 tons during any consecutive 12-month period in order to stay below NOx RACT applicability thresholds. (Regulation 6.42)(See Comment 6)
11. ForEmission Points E04A, E04B and E05: The owner or operator shall not allow or cause NOx emissionto exceed 37 tons perboiler duringMarch 1through October 31. iii. ForEmission PointE02A:

e. TAC No boiler shall have a monthly capacity factor greater than 10.0% for any month during the period March 1 to October 31. The term "monthly capacity factor" means the ratio between the actual heat input to a boiler from fuel combusted during a month and the potential heat input to a boiler form fuel combusted during a month and the potential heat input to the boiler had it been operated for 24 hours per day for the number ofdays in the month atthe maximum steady state design heat input capacity.

The owner or operator shall not allow any TAC emissiOns to exceed environmentally acceptable levels whether specifically established bymodelingor derived from default de minimis levels. (Regulation 5.01, section 3.) S2. Monitoring (Regulation 2.16, section 4.1.9.1.2)

SCH a. PM For emission points E02A, E04A, E04B and E05, the owner or operator shall maintain records ofmonthly natural gas and/or other fuel usage. b. Opacity There are no monitoring requirements for Opacity compliance. (See Comment 2) Page 45 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 c. 

## so2 40 CPR 60 Subpart DC monitoring requirements for S02 compliance. (See Comment 1)
1. The owner or operator shall keep records ofthe amount offuel com busted during each month. (40 CFR 60.48c(g)(2)) ii. The owner or operator shall monthly calculate the prorated fuel usage of the boiler by correlating the design heat input capacity of all natural gas fired units at the plant ifthe individual fuel usage for each boiler is not known. (EPA Letter dated March 7, 2002) (See Comment 3) d. NOx Maintain records ofmonthly fuel usage, and use AP-42 emission factors and/or fuel analysis data, to calculate monthly emissions.
e. TAC See Comment4. S3. Record Keeping (Regulation 2.16, section 4.1.9.2)

a. PM See Specific Condition S2.a. b. Opacity There are no record keeping requirements for Opacity compliance. (See Comment 2)

See Specific Condition S2.c. d. NOx The owner or operator shall calculate and record the monthly and 12 consecutive monthplant-wide NOx emissions for each month inthe report period.
e. TAC See Comment4. S4. Reporting (Regulation 2.16, section 4.1.9.3) SCH Page 46 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072

a. PM See PAL Reporting Requirements, there are no additional reporting requirements for demonstrating compliance with Regulation 6.07 and 7.06. 

### b. Opacity There are no reportingrequirements for Opacity compliance. (See Comment 2)

See PAL Reporting Requirements, there are no additional reporting requirements for demonstrating compliance withRegulation 6.07 and 7.06. 

### d. NOx See PAL Reporting Requirements.
e. TAC See Comment4. S5. Testing (Regulation 2.16, section 4.1.9.3)

SCH a. PM There are no testing requirements for PM compliance. b. Opacity There are no testing requirements for Opacity compliance.

There are no testingrequirements for S02 compliance. d. NOx Within the initial10-yearterm ofthe PALpermit, the owner or operator shall test at least once to establish an emission factor for emission points E04A and E04B.

e. TAC There are no testing requirements for TAC compliance. Page 47 of 130 03-31-2011

### PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 U002 - U004 Comments 

### 1. The District has performed a one-time PM and S02 

### compliance demonstration for the boiler, using AP-42 emission factors and combusting natural gas, and the emission standards cannot be exceeded. Therefore, there are no monitoring, record keeping, and reporting requirements for this boiler with respect to PM and S02 

### emission limits. 2. The District has determined that using a natural gas fired boiler 

### will inherently meet the 20% opacity standard. Therefore, the company is not required to perform periodic monitoring to demonstrate compliance with the opacity standard. 3. The federal regulation 40 CPR 63, Subpart DDDDD was vacated on June 8, 2007, therefore the District has not included the boiler MACT requirements in this permit. The company has submitted the Part 1 and Part 2 of the 112j permit application for the vacated boiler MACT (40 CPR 63 Subpart DDDDD), dated on March 5, 2009 and May 8, 2009 respectively. The District is evaluating how to implement this requirement. 4. The TAC emissions from the combustion ofnatural gas are considered to be "de minimis emissions" by the District. This includes all ofthe emissions from a process or process equipment for which the only emissions are the products ofcombustion ofnatural gas, such as from a natural gas-fired boiler or turbine, but does not include the other emissions from a process or process equipment that are not the products of the combustion of natural gas. (Regulation 5.01, section 1.6.7) 5. In a letter dated March 7, 2002 from EPA Region 4, EPA has identified certain types of alternative record keeping requirements for units that are regulated under 40 CPR 60 Subpart De (Standards of Performance for Small Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units) that can be approved by the District without additional input from EPA. 6. This PALpermit supercedes constructionpermit #623-94-C and the plant-wide NOx limit is replacing the 39.9 tpy PSD/NSRNOx avoidance limit for the two (2) CleaverBrooks boilers (E04A and E04B). 7. Ford currently has a 146 MM Btu/hr boiler emission point E02A, however to keep 40 CPR 60, Subpart Db from being applicable, Ford can only install additional boilers totaling less than 100 MM Btu/hr.

SCH Page 48 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 U008 Emission Unit Description: Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Tanks U008 Applicable Regulations: Federally Enforceable Regulations Regulation Title Applicable Sections 1.05 Compliance withEmission Standards and 1,2,3,4,5 Maintenance Requirements 7.12 Standard ofPerformance for New Storage 1though 5; 7 and 8 Vessels for Volatile Organic Compounds

District Only Enforceable Regulations Regulation Title Applicable Sections 1.18 Rule Effectiveness 1through 3 5.01 General Provisions 1through 4 5.14 Hazardous Air Pollutants and Source Categories 1 and 2 5.21 Environmental Acceptabilityfor Toxic Air 1through 5 Contaminants Procedures for Determiningthe Maximum 5.22 Ambient Concentration ofa Toxic Air 1through 5 Contaminant 5.23 Categories ofToxic Air Contaminants 1through 66

SCH Page 49 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) UOOS Emission Points:

ID Description 6000 gallon E08A Methanol Tank 10,000 gallon UG E08G Solvent Tank
E08M 20,000 gallon AntiFreeze Tank 20,000 gallon Power E08N Steering Fluid Tank 6000 gallon Brake E080 Fluid Tank
E08P 20,000 gallon Diesel Fuel Tank Plant ID: 0072

UOOS Emission Points Applicable Allowable Emission/ Control Requirement Equipment Standard Device 5.21 7.12 Submerged Fill N/A 5.21 N/A VaporPressure < 1.5 psia 7.12 5.21 N/A VaporPressure< 1.5 psia 7.12 5.21 7.12 VaporPressure < 1.5 psia N/A 5.21 VaporPressure< 1.5 psia N/A 7.12 5.21 VaporPressure< 1.5 psia N/A 7.12
UOOS Control Devices: There are no control devices associated with Emission Unit U008.

SCH Page 50 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 U008 Specific Conditions S1. Standards (Regulation 2.16, section4.1.1)
a. VOC i. See Louisville Assembly Plant, Ford Motor Company Plant-wide Applicability Limit (PAL). ii. The owner or operator shall not store materials with an as stored vapor pressure ofgreaterthan or equal to 1.5 psia, however ifthe vaporpressure ofthe VOC, as stored, is equal to or greater than 1.5 psi, as a minimum, it shall be equipped with a permanent submerged fill pipe. (Regulation 7.12, section 3) b. TAC The owner or operator shall not allow any TAC emissiOns to exceed environmentally acceptable levels whether specifically established by modeling or derived from default de minimis levels. (Regulation 5.01, section 3.) S2. Monitoring (Regulation 2.16, section 4.1.9.1.2)
a. VOC See Specific Condition S3.a.i. b. TAC See Specific Condition S3.b. S3. Record Keeping (Regulation 2.16, section 4.1.9.2)

SCH a. VOC
1. The owner or operator shall maintain records ofthe material stored in each storage vessel. Ifthe contents ofthe storage vessels are changed, a record shall be made ofthe new contents, the newvapor pressure, and the date of the change in service.
11. The owner or operator shall either maintain monthly records, including calculations, from either monthly usage records or ratioed annual emissions from the previous year that show the total VOC emissions during each calendar month and consecutive 12-month period for this emission unit. Page 51 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) PlantID: 0072 b. 

### TAC The owner or operator shall keep a record ofthe Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for each TAC-containing material in this emission unit. S4. Reporting (Regulation 2.16, section 4.1.9.3)

a. VOC See General Permit Reporting Requirements. b. 

### TAC The owner or operator shall submit a plant-wide emissions-based EA Demonstration to the District showing compliance with theplant-wide EA goals of7.5 new and existing, 3.8 for all new combined, and 1 for each process when a change occurs that increases emissions above De minimus or previously modeled values. UOOS Comment 1. Emissionpoints E08M, E08N and E08P are not subjectto 40 CPR 60 subpart Kb because this subpart does not apply to storage vessels with a capacity greater than or equal to 151 m3 (39,890 gallons) storing a liquid with a maximum true vapor pressure less than 3.5 kilopascals (kPa) (0.51 psi) or with a capacity greater than or equal to 75 m3 (19,813 gallons) but less than 151 m 3 (39,890 gallons) storing a liquid with a maximum true vaporpressure less than 15.0 kPa (2.18 psi).

SCH Page 52 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 Emission Unit U009: Glass Installation U009 Applicable Regulations : Federally Enforceable Regulations Regulation Title Applicable Sections 1.05 Compliance with Emission Standards and 1, 3, 4 and 5 Maintenance Requirements Standards of Performance for New 7.59 Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products Surface 1through 7 Coating Operations 40 CPR 63 General Provisions 60.1 through 60.18 SubpartA 40 CPR 63 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Subpart IIII Pollutants: Surface Coating ofAutomobiles and 1,2,3,4, 7,and8 Light-Duty Trucks
District Only Enforceable Regulations Regulation Title Applicable Sections 1.18 Rule Effectiveness 1through 3 5.01 General Provisions 1through 4 5.02 Adoption ofNationalEmission Standards for 1, 3,4 and 5 Hazardous AirPollutants 5.14 Hazardous AirPollutants and Source Categories 1 and 2 5.21 Environmental Acceptabilityfor Toxic Air 1through 5 Contaminants Procedures for Determiningthe Maximum 5.22 Ambient Concentration ofa Toxic Air 1through 5 Contaminant 5.23 Categories ofToxic Air Contaminants 1through 6

SCH Page 53 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) U009 Emission Points:

ID Description Glass, E09A Windshield, and BackLights Installation Plant ID: 0072

U009 Emission Points Applicable Allowable Emission/ Control Stack Requirement Equipment Standard Device ID 5.21 3.5 lb/gal, less water and N/A S-400 exempt VOCs, as applied 7.59 U009 Control Devices: There are no control devices associated withEmission Unit U009.

SCH Page 54 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 U009 Specific Conditions S1. Standards (Regulation 2.16, section 4.1.1)
a. VOC
1. The owner or operator shall not cause or allow the emission ofVOC from any affected facility resulting from the coating of metallic surfaces in excess of0.42 kg ofVOC/1 (3.5 lb VOC/gal) ofcoating, excluding water and exempt solvents, as applied for extreme performance coatings. (Regulation 7.59, section 3.1.3) ii. See Louisville Assembly Plant, Ford Motor Company Plant-wide Applicability Limit (PAL). b. TAC The owner or operator shall not allow any TAC emtsswns to exceed environmentally acceptable levels whether specifically established bymodeling or derived from default de minimis levels. (Regulation 5.01, section 3.)
c. HAP See LAP MACT Standards Section. S2. Monitoring (Regulation 2.16, section 4.1.9.1)

SCH a. VOC The owner or operator shall maintain the following monthly records to demonstrate ongoing compliance with the VOC content limit and with Regulation 1.05, section 4:
1. Calculations ofVOC emissions from each facility based on the recorded parameters. Calculations of daily usage and VOC emissions from each facility based on the recorded parameters by prorating monthly net usage based on daily vehicleproduction.
11. Determine daily usage ofeach material and VOC emissions by prorating monthly consumption based on daily vehicles produced. b. TAC See Specific Condition S3.b.
c. HAP Page 55 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 See LAP MACTMonitoring Section. S3. Record Keeping (Regulation 2.16, section 4.1.9.2)

SCH The owner or operator shall maintain the required records for a minimum of5 years and make the records readily available to the District upon request.
a. VOC
1. An owner or operator ofan affected facility subjectto this regulation shall maintain records that include, but not be limited to, the following: (Regulation 7.59, section 6.1) 1) The regulation and section number applicable to the affected facility for which the records are being maintained, 2) The application method and substrate type (metal, plastic, etc.), 3) The amount and type of coatings (including catalyst and reducer for multicomponent coatings) and solvent (including exempt compounds) used at each point ofapplication during the averaging period. The District may specifically authorize the usage record to reflect a period longer than the compliance averaging period, with the usage prorated for each compliance averaging period by a method approved by the District. In this case, the usage record period shall not exceed 1 calendarmonth, 4) The VOC content as applied in each coating and solvent, 5) The date, or usage record period, for each application of coating and solvent, 6) The amount of surface preparation, clean-up, wash-up of solvent (including exempt compounds) used and the VOC content ofeach material used during the averaging period. The District may specifically authorize the usage record to reflect a period longer than the compliance averaging period, with the usage prorated for each compliance averaging period by a method approved by the District. In this case, the usage record period shall not exceed 1 calendar month. ii. The owner or operator shall maintain monthly records, including calculations, that show the total plant-wide VOC emissions during each calendar month and consecutive 12-monthperiod. Page 56 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 111. The owner or operator shall maintain a copy ofthe Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for each VOC containingmaterial used at this plant b. TAC The owner or operator shall keep a record ofthe Material SafetyData Sheet (MSDS) for each TAC-containing material in this emission unit.
c. HAP See LAP MACTRecordkeeping Section. S4. Reporting (Regulation 2.16, section. 4.1.9.3)

SCH 

### a. VOC See General PermitReporting Requirements. b. TAC The owner or operator shall submit a plant-wide emissions-based EA Demonstration to the District showing compliance with theplant-wide EA goals of7.5 new and existing, 3.8 for all new combined, and 1 for each process when a change occurs that increases emissions above De minimus orpreviously modeled values.
c. HAP See LAP MACTRepmiing Requirements.

Page 57 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 U010 Emission UnitDescription: E-Coat Operation U010 Applicable Regulations: Federally Enforceable Regulations Regulation Title Applicable Sections 1.05 Compliance with Emission Standards and 1, 3, 4 and 5 Maintenance Requirements 7.01 General Provisions 7.2 7.08 Standards ofPerformance for NewProcess 1through 3 Operations 40 CPR 60 General Provisions 60.1 through 60.18 SubpartA 40 CPR 60 National Emission Standards ofPerformance for SubpartMM Automobile and LightDutyTruck Surface 60.390 through 60.397 Coating Operations 40 CPR 63 General Provisions 63.1 through 63.16 SubpartA 40 CPR 63 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Subpart IIII Pollutants: Surface Coating ofAutomobiles and 1, 2, 3 ,4, 7 and 8 Light-Duty Trucks

District Only Enforceable Regulations Regulation Subject Applicable Sections 1.18 Rule Effectiveness 1through 3 5.01 General Provisions 1through 4 5.02 Adoption ofNational Emission Standards for 1, 3, 4 and 5 Hazardous AirPollutants 5.14 Hazardous AirPollutants and Source Categories 1 and 2 5.21 Environmental Acceptabilityfor Toxic Air 1through 5 Contaminants 5.22 Procedures for Determining the Maximum Ambient 1through 5 Concentration ofa Toxic Air Contaminant 5.23 Categories ofToxic Air Contaminants 1through 6 7.02 Federal New Source Performance Standards 1.50, 2 , 3, 4 and 5 Incorporated by Reference SCH Page 58 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072


### UOlO Emission Points: U010 Emission Points ID Description Applicable Allowable Emission/Equipment Control Requirement Standard Device (RT) is 2 0.16, not exceed 1.4 lbs/gal 40 CPR 60 (0.17 kg/!) SubpartMM RT is 2 0.04 and < 0.16, not exceed the weight per gallon limit calculated as follows: 0.17 x 350<0 160 -\)kg ofVOC per liter of applied coating solids 6.17 and 7.01 E10A E-CoatDip RT is< 0.040, not be subject to an N/A Tank emission limit a. 0.6 lbs HAP/GACS Or b. 1.1 lbs HAPs/GACS 40 CPR 63 (the above limits are applicable to a Subpart IIII group ofemissions sources and are different depending upon whether compliance is demonstrated with (a) or without (b) E-coat) 40 CPR 60 SubpartMM See Specific Condition Sl.a 6.17 and 7.01 a. 0.6 lbs HAP/GACS Or C10A E10B E-Coat Oven b. 1.1 lbs HAPs/GACS 40 CPR 63 (the above limits are applicable to a Subpart IIII group ofemissions sources and are different depending upon whether compliance is demonstrated with (a) or without (b) E-coat) 7.08 

### < 300 ppm

SCH Page 59 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 

### UOlO Emission Points ID Description Applicable Allowable Emission/Equipment Control Requirement Standard Device

40 CPR 60 SubpartMM See Specific Condition S1.a 6.17 and 7.01

40 CPR 63 a. 0.6 lbs HAP/GACS Subpart IIII Or E10C E-Coat Oven b. 1.1 lbs HAPs/GACS C10B (3rd Pass) (the above limits are applicable to a group ofemissions sources and are different depending upon whether compliance is demonstrated with (a) or without (b) E-coat) 7.08 < 300ppm 40 CPR 60 SubpartMM See Specific Condition Sl.a 6.17 and 7.01 E-Coat a. 0.6 lbs HAP/GACS E10D Dump Metal Or NIA AST b. 1.1 lbs HAPs/GACS 40 CPR 63 (the above limits are applicable to a Subpart IIII group ofemissions sources and are different depending upon whether compliance is demonstrated with (a) or without (b) E-coat) E-Coat Scuff· <20% E17A Booth 7.08 C17A 2.34lb/hr U010 Control Devices: ID Performance StackiD Description Indicator C10A One (1) Regenerative Thermal Temperature S-041, S-043, S-045 Oxidizer (RTO) C10B One (1) Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer (RTO) Temperature S-020 to S-022, S-050 C17A DryPanel Filter N/A S-047, S-048

SCH Page 60 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 U010 Specific Conditions S1. Standards (Regulation 2.16, section 4.1.1)

SCH a. VOC i. The owner or operator shall be subject to the following emission limits (40 CFR 60.392, Regulation 7.01 section 7.2 and Regulation 6.17, section 3): 1) When the solids turnover ratio (RT) is ;::::: 0.16, not exceed 1.4 lbs/gal (0.17 kg/1) ofapplied coating solids. 2) When the RT is;::::: 0.04 and< 0.16, not exceed the weightper gallon limit calculated as follows: 0.17 x 350(0

· 160

-RT) kg ofVOCper liter ofapplied coating solids. 3) When the RT is < 0.040, not be subject to an emission limit established pursuantto this regulation.
11. See Louisville Assembly Plant, Ford Motor Company Plant-wide Applicability Limit (PAL). b. 

### PM
1. See Louisville Assembly Plant, Ford Motor Company Plant-wide Applicability Limit (PAL). ii. The owner or operator shall not allow PM emissions to exceed 2.34 lb/hr. (Regulation 7.08, section 3.1.2) (See Comment 1)
111. The owner or operator shall not operate the scuff booth unless the particulate filters are installed and operating properly. The owner or operator shall follow good operating practices for the particulate filters. c. Opacity The owner or operator shall not allow visible emissions to equal or exceed 20% opacity. (Regulation 7.08, section 3.1.1) 

### d. HAP See LAP Ford Motor Company MACT Standards Section.
e. NOx The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from Page 61 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 any affected facility or from any air pollution control equipment installed on any affected facility anyNOx fumes in excess of300 ppm by volume expressed as N02• (Regulation 7.08, section 4) (See Comment 2) f. TAC
1. The owner or operator shall not allow any TAC emissions to exceed environmentally acceptable levels whether specifically established by modeling or derived from default de minimis levels. (Regulation 5.01, section 3.) ii. The owner or operator shall utilize the control devices at all times the surface coating operations are in operation and shall, maintain and operate any affected facility including associated air pollution control equipment in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practice for minimizing emissions. (Regulation 5.21, section 4.7) S2. Monitoring (Regulation 2.16, section 4.1.9.1.2)

SCH a. VOC i. Monitor ongoing compliance by calculating monthly, the daily volumeweighted average VOC content ofthe coatings (including resin, pigment, and flow control additive) used. Procedures used for this determination may be those provided in the "Protocol for Determining Daily Volatile Organic Compound Emission Rate ofAutomobile and Light-Duty Truck Topcoat Operations," EPA-450/3-88-018 (Docket ID No. OAR-2002- 0093 and Docket ID No. A-2001-22). ii. The owner or operator shall during operation of any coating operation(s) for which emission reductions due to the use ofadd-on control equipment are relied upon to demonstrate compliance with the emission limits above, maintain the afterburners combustion chamber temperature at :2:: 760° Cor other temperature, as determined during the latest stack test, based upon a three hour average, and maintain a combustion chambertemperature ofno more than 28°C (50°F) below the average combustion temperature. In addition, the afterburners shall have a minimum residence time of 0.5 seconds. The temperature shall be recorded using a recorder, which shall be calibrated and maintained according to the· manufacturer's specifications. Temperature measurements of the thermal oxidizer combustion chamber shall be made at least once every 15 minutes and recorded during operation ofthe associated coating operations. iii. If necessary for purposes of compliance, this line shall not be operated unless all control devices are beingproperly operated. Page 62 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072

SCH iv. Use EPA Method 24 to determine the amount ofVOC in the coating. The following equation may be used as an alternate method to demonstrate compliance:

Where: VOCw 

### = the weighted average coating VOC content, as applied; and less water and exempt solvents, expressed in pounds of VOC per gallon ofcoating.
n 

### = number ofdifferent coatings used on a coating line a given month. V1 

### = the volume ofeach coating used on a coating line, as applied and less water and exempt solvents, a given month. C 1 the VOC content ofeach coating used on a coating line, as applied and less water and exempt solvents, a given month. 

### Vt = total volume of all coatings applied each month on a coating line, less water and exempt solvents.

v. Meet the standards specified in 40 CPR 60.392, as calculated using the prescribed transfer efficiency of 40 CPR 60.393(c)(l)(i)(C) for the monthly weighted average mass of VOC emitted per volume of applied coating solids. b. PM The owner or operator shall include monthly inspection routine maintenance as recommended bythe manufacturer, andpromptrepair ofany defects.
c. Opacity See Specific Condition S2.b. d. HAP See LAP Ford Motor Company MACTMonitoring Section.

e. NOx There are no monitoring requirements forNOx compliance. (See Comment 2) Page 63 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 f. TAC i. See Specific Condition S2.a.ii and iii. ii. See Specific Condition S3.f. S3. Record Keeping (Regulation 2.16, section 4.1.9.2)

SCH a. VOC Perform record keeping for VOCs for 40 CFR 60.395 and 1.05, Section 4: i. Record monthly the quantity ofresin, pigment, and flow control additive added to the electrocoat system. ii. Determine and record monthly usage ofeach material. 111. Calculations shall incorporate control efficiency where being relied upon for compliance purposes and shall include downtime adjustments to account for increased emissions during the period the afterburners were not operating. If used for compliance, the owner or operator shall also maintain records ofcontrol device downtimes and bypasses, including the date and duration ofeach occurrence. iv. The owner or operator shall continuously record the incinerator combustion temperature during coating operations for thermal incineration or the gas temperature upstream and downstream of the incinerator catalyst bed during coating operations for catalytic incineration.
v. The owner or operator shall maintain monthly records, including calculations that show the total plant-wide VOC emissions during each calendarmonth and consecutive 12-monthperiod. v1. Record the afterburner combustion chamber temperature and temperature recording frequency from Specific Condition S2.a.ii. b. PM 1. The owner or operator shall keep a record that shows the date and the name ofthe personwho inspectedthe filters and iffilters were replaced. 11. Proper operation of the fabric filter shall be ensured by maintaining records of inspections and routine maintenance activities and shall make these records available to the District upon request. A demonstration that Page 64 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 proper operation ofthe fabric filter has occurred satisfies this compliance requirement for the standard specified inSl.b.ii. above.
c. Opacity See Specific Condition S3.b. 

### d. HAP See LAP Ford Motor Company MACTRecordkeeping Section.
e. NOx There are no record keepingrequirements for NOx compliance. (See Comment 2) f. TAC 

### i. The owner or operator shall keep a record of the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for each TAC-containingmaterial in this emission unit.
11. The owner or operator shall maintain records that identify all periods of bypassing the control devices while the surface coating operations are in operation for a given day. The records shall include the date, duration (including start and stop time) ofeach bypass event, identification ofthe control device and process equipment in operation, and the total lb/hr emissions ofeach TAC from each piece ofequipment during each bypass event, if that control equipment is required to meet the EA goals. (See Comment 3)
111. See Specific Conditions S3.a.iii. S4. Reporting (Regulation 2.16, section 4.1.9.2)

SCH a. VOC 

### i. See General Permit Reporting Requirements.
11. For the control devices, the owner or operator shall clearly identify all deviations from permit requirements. If no deviations occur in that reporting period then the owner or operator shall report a negative declaration including the following information: 1) Emission Unit number and Control ID number; 2) The beginning and ending date ofthe reporting period; 3) Identification ofthe operatingparameters beingmonitored; 4) Number, duration, and cause ofall exceedances ofthe parameters; Page 65 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) PlantID: 0072

SCH and 5) Description ofthe corrective action taken for each exceedance.
111. Perform reporting for VOCs for 40 CFR 60.395 and 1.05, Section 4:

b. PM 1) The owner or operator shall report the volume weighted average mass of VOC per volume of applied coating solids for each affected facility. 2) For thermal incinerators, every three-hour period shall be reported during which the average temperature measured is more than 28 

## oc less thanthe average temperature during the mostrecent control device performance test. 3) For catalytic incinerators, every three-hourperiod shall be reported during which the average temperature immediately before the catalyst bed, when the coating system is operational, is more than 28 

## oc less than the average temperature immediately before the catalyst bed during the most recent control device performance test at which destruction efficiency was determined. In addition, every three-hour period shall be reported each quarter during which the average temperature difference across the catalyst bed when the coating system is operational is less than 80 percent ofthe average temperature difference ofthe device during the mostrecent control device performance test at which destruction efficiency was determined. 4) Forthermal and catalytic incinerators, ifno such periods occur, the owner or operator shall submit a negative report. 5) The owner or operator shall notify the Administrator 30 days in advance ofanytestbyMethod 25.
Any deviation from the requirementto perform monthlyvisible inspections ofthe scuffboothPMfilter system.
c. Opacity See Specific Condition S4.b. d. HAP See LAP Ford Motor CompanyMACTReporting Requirements.

e. NOx There are no reporting requirements forNOx compliance. (See Comment 2) Page 66 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 

### f. TAC i. The owner or operator shall submit a plant-wide emissions-based EA Demonstration to the District showing compliance with theplant-wide EA goals of 7.5 new and existing, 3.8 for all new combined, and 1 for each process when a change occurs that increases emissions above De minimus or previously modeled values.
11. Identification of all periods of bypassing the control devices while the surface coating operations were in operation during a reporting period. The report shall include the date, duration (including start and stop time) ofeach bypass event, and the totallb/hr emissions ofeach TAC from each piece ofequipment during each bypass event, ifthat control equipment is required to meetthe EA goals. (See Comment 3) iii. See Specific Conditions S4.a.ii. DOlO Comments 1. Compliance with this requirement is demonstrated through a mass balance approach or engineering estimate. 2. The District has performed a one-time NOx compliance demonstration using AP-42 emission factors and combusting natural gas, and the emission standard cannot be exceeded. Therefore, there are no monitoring, record keeping, and reporting requirements with respect to NOx emission limits. 3. The reported total lb/hr emissions of each TAC from each piece of equipment during each bypass event will be used to determine ifeach TAC claimed as de minimis pursuant to Regulation 5.01 Section 1.6 in Ford Motor Company Louisville Assembly Plant's current plant-wide emissions-based EA demonstration continue to meet the de minimis criteria specified in Section 1.6.4. Should emissions during a bypass event for a TAC claimedto be de minimis exceedthe de minimis criteria, FordMotor Company Louisville Assembly Plant shall submit an updated plant-wide emission-based EADemonstration to the District showing compliance with the plant-wide EA goals of7.5 new and existing, 3.8 for all new combined, and 1 for each process where the TAC emissions increase above de minimis values.

SCH Page 67 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 U011 Emission Unit Description: Guidecoat Operation UOll Applicable Regulations: Federally Enforceable Regulations Regulation Title Applicable Sections 1.05 Compliance with Emission Standards and 1,3,4and5 Maintenance Requirements 7.01 General Provisions 7.2 7.08 Standards ofPerformance for NewProcess 1through 3 Operations Standards ofPerformance for New 7.59 Miscellaneous Metal Parts Products Surface 1through 7 Coating Operation 40 CFR 60 General Provisions 60.1 through 60.18 SubpartA 40 CFR 60 National Emission Standards ofPerformance for SubpartMM Automobile and Light Duty Truck Surface 60.390 through 60.397 Coating Operations 40 CFR 63 General Provisions 63.1 through 63.16 SubpartA 40 CFR 63 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Subpart IIII Pollutants: Smface Coating ofAutomobiles and 1, 2, 3 ,4, 7 and 8 Light-Duty Trucks

SCH Page 68 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072

District Only Enforceable Regulations Regulation Title Applicable Sections 1.18 Rule Effectiveness 1through 3 5.01 General Provisions 1through 4 5.02 Adoption ofNational Emission Standards for 1, 3, 4 and 5 Hazardous AirPollutants 5.14 Hazardous AirPollutants and Source Categories 1 and 2 5.21 Environmental Acceptability for Toxic Air 1through 5 Contaminants Procedures for Determiningthe Maximum 5.22 Ambient Concentration ofa Toxic Air 1through 5 Contaminant 5.23 Categories ofToxic Air Contaminants 1through 6 7.02 Federal New Source Performance Standards 1.50, 2 , 3, 4 and 5 Incorporated by Reference

SCH Page 69 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) DOll Emission Points:

ID Description

Guidecoat Paint EllA Spray Booth andAir Supply House

Touchup and EllB Blackout Booth

EllC Guidecoat Oven (1st and 2nd Pass)

SCH Plant ID: 0072

DOll Emission Points Applicable Allowable Emission/ Control Requirement Equipment Standard Device

40 CPR 60 SubpartMM See Specific Condition Sl.a 6.17 and 7.01
a. 0.6 lbs HAP/GACS Or CllA b. 1.1 lbs HAPs/GACS 40 CPR 63 (the above limits are applicable to a Subpart IIII group ofemissions sources and are different depending upon whether compliance is demonstrated with

(a) orwithout (b) Guidecoat) <20% ClOB 7.08 2.34lb/hr 7.59 3.5 lbs VOC/gal 40 CPR 60 SubpartMM See Specific Condition Sl.a 6.17 and 7.01 a. 0.6 lbs HAP/GACS Or b. 1.1 lbs HAPs/GACS CllC 40 CPR 63 (the above limits are applicable to a Subpart IIII group ofemissions sources and are different depending upon whether compliance is demonstrated with

(a) or without (b) Guidecoat) 7.08 < 300 ppm

Page 70 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) PlantID: 0072 

### UOll Emission Points ID Description Applicable Allowable Emission/ Control Requirement Equipment Standard Device

40 CFR60 SubpartMM See Specific Condition Sl.a 6.17 and 7.01

40 CPR 63 a. 0.6 lbs HAP/GACS Guidecoat Oven (3rd Subpart IIII Or EllD b. 1.1 lbs HAPs/GACS ClOB Pass) (the above limits are applicable to a group ofemissions sources and are different depending upon whether compliance is demonstrated with

(a) orwithout (b) Guidecoat) 7.08 < 300 ppm EllE/ Guidecoat/Topcoat 1.05 Same as for 7.59 N/A E12G Paint Kitchen 40 CPR 60.3092 See Specific Condition Sl.a Guidecoat (Prime) <20% ElSA 7.08 Cl8A ScuffBooth 2.34 lb/hr 

### UOll Control Devices: 

### UOll Control Devices
ID Description Performance Indicator Stack ID CllA Water Wash N/A S-080 to S090 ClOB One (1) Regenerative Temperature S-179 to S182 and S-098, S099, Thermal Oxidizer (RTO) S050 CllC One (1) Regenerative Temperature S-091 to S-092, S-097 Thermal Oxidizer (RTO) Cl8A DryPanel Filter N/A S-175 to S-178

SCH Page 71 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 U011 Specific Conditions S1. Standards (Regulation 2.16, section 4.1.1)

SCH a. VOC
1. The owner or operator shall be subject to the limit of 1.40 kg VOC/1 (11.7 lb VOC/gal) ofapplied coating solids, less water and exempt solvents. (40 CFR 60.392)
11. The owner or operator shall be subject to the limit of 1.8 kg VOC/1 (15.1 lb VOC/gal) of applied coating solids, less water and exempt solvents. (Regulation 7.01 section 7.2 and Regulation 6.17, section 3.2) (See Comment 3) iii. For Emission Point E11B, the owner or operator shall not cause or allow the emission ofVOC from any affected facility resulting from the coating ofmetallic surfaces in excess of0.42 kg ofVOC/1 (3.5lb ofVOC/gal) of coating, excluding water and exempt solvents, as applied for extreme performance coatings. (Regulation 7.59, section 3.1.3) iv. See Louisville Assembly Plant, Ford Motor Company Plant-wide Applicability Limit (PAL). b. PM i. See Louisville Assembly Plant, Ford Motor Company Plant-wide Applicability Limit (PAL). ii. The owner or operator shall not allow PM emissions to exceed 2.34 lb/hr. (Regulation 7.08, section 3.1.2) (See Comment 1)
111. The owner or operator shall not operate the scuff booth unless the particulate filters are installed and operating properly. The owner or operator shall follow good operatingpractices for the particulate filters.
c. Opacity The owner or operator shall not allowvisible emissions to equal or exceed 20% opacity. (Regulation 7.08, section 3.1.1) d. HAP See LAP FordMotor Company MACT Standards Section.
e. NOx Page 72 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any affected facility or from any airpollution control equipment installed on any affected facility anyNOx fumes in excess of300ppm byvolume expressed as N02. (Regulation 7.08, section 4) (See Comment 2) 

### f. TAC i. The owner or operator shall not allow any TAC emissions to exceed environmentally acceptable levels whether specifically established by modeling or derived from default de minimis levels. (Regulation 5.01, section 3.)

11. The owner or operator shall utilize the control devices at all times the surface coating operations are in operation and shall, maintain and operate any affected facility including associated air pollution control equipment in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practice for minimizing emissions. (Regulation 5.21, section 4.7) S2. Monitoring (Regulation 2.16, section 4.1.9.1)

SCH a. VOC
1. For Emission Point EllB, record monthly usage. Determine daily usage of each material by prorating monthly consumption based on daily vehicles produced. Record the amount of surface preparation, clean up, wash-up of solvent (including exempt compounds) used and the VOC content of each material used during the averaging period. (Regulation 7.59, section 3.1.4 and 6.1.6, and 2.16, section 4.1.9.1.2) ii. The owner or operator shall during operation of any coating operation(s) for which emission reductions due to the use ofadd-on control equipment are relied upon to demonstrate compliance with the emission limits above, maintain the afterburners combustion chamber temperature at;:::: 760° C or other temperature, as determined during the latest stack test, based upon a three hour average, and maintain a combustion chamber temperature ofno more than 28°C (50°F) below the average combustion temperature. In addition, the afterburners shall have a minimum residence time of 0.5 seconds. The temperature shall be recorded using a recorder, which shall be calibrated and maintained according to the manufacturer's specifications. Temperature measurements of the thermal oxidizer combustion chamber shall be made at least once every 15 minutes and recorded during operation ofthe associated coating operations.
111. The line shall not be operated unless all control devices are beingproperly operated. Page 73 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072

SCH iv. Measure capture efficiency pursuant to Regulation 1.05, Section 3, except that EPA Method 204F, Volatile Organic Compounds Content in Liquid Input Stream (Distillation Approach), shall be used to determine VOC input.
v. Use EPA Method 24 to determine the amount ofVOC in the coating. The following equation may be used as an alternate method to demonstrate compliance:

b. 

### PM Where: VOCw 

### = the daily weighted average coating VOC content, as applied; and less water and exempt solvents, expressed in pounds of VOC per gallon ofcoating.
n = number ofdifferent coatings used on a coating line a given day. V 1 

### = the volume ofeach coating used on a coating line, as applied and less water and exempt solvents, a given day. C1 the VOC content ofeach coating used on a coating line, as applied and less water and exempt solvents, a given day. 

### Vt = total volume ofall coatings applied each day on a coating line, less water and exempt solvents.

The owner or operator shall include monthly inspection routine maintenance as recommended bythe manufacturer, and promptrepair ofany defects.
c. Opacity See Specific Condition S2.b. d. HAP See LAP Ford Motor CompanyMACTMonitoring Section.
e. 

### NOx There are no monitoring requirements for NOx compliance. (See Comment 2) Page 74 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 f. TAC
1. See Specific Condition S2.a.iii and iv. ii. See Specific Condition S3.f. S3. Record Keeping (Regulation 2.16, section 4.1.9.2)

SCH a. VOC
1. For Emission Point EllB, the owner or operator of an affected facility subject to this regulation shall maintain records that include, but not be limited to, the following: (Regulation 7.59, section 6.1) 1) The regulation and section number applicable to the affected facility for which the records are being maintained, 2) The application method and substrate type (metal, plastic, etc.), 3) The amount and type of coatings (including catalyst and reducer for multi-component coatings) and solvent (including exempt compounds) used at each point ofapplication during the averaging period. The District may specifically authorize the usage record to reflect a period longer than the compliance averaging period, with the usage prorated for each compliance averaging period by a method approved by the District. In this case, the usage record period shall not exceed 1 calendarmonth, 4) The VOC content as applied in each coating and solvent, 5) The date, or usage record period, for each application of coating and solvent, 6) The amount of surface preparation, clean-up, wash-up of solvent (including exempt compounds) used and the VOC content ofeach material used during the averaging period. The District may specifically authorize the usage record to reflect a period longer than the compliance averaging period, with the usage prorated for each compliance averaging period by a method approved by the District. In this case, the usage record period shall not exceed 1 calendarmonth.
11. The owner or operator shall maintain the following records: (40 CFR 60.395 and 1.05, Section 4) 1) Record daily the quantity ofpaint and dilution solvent added to the Page 75 of 130 03-31-2011

### PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072

SCH guidecoat (primer surfacer). 2) The owner or operator shall monitor ongoing compliance by calculating monthly, a daily volume-weighted average of the coatings used. 3) Combine daily pour records with monthly tank level readings to determine monthly paint usage. 4) Determine daily paint usage of each material by prorating consumption based on daily surface area coated. 5) Determine daily usage and emissions by using calculation procedures in Protocol for Determining the Daily Volatile Organic CompoundEmission Rate ofAutomobile and Light Truck Topcoat Operations, EPA-450/3-88-018. 6) Calculations shall incorporate control efficiency and shall include downtime adjustments to account for increased emissions during the period the afterburners were not operating. The owner or operator shall also maintain records ofcontrol devices downtimes and bypasses, including the date and duration ofeach occurrence. 7) Report all instances ofnon-compliance to the District no later than (15) days after the occurrence has been confirmed, notwithstanding Regulation 1.07. 8) Meet the standards specified in 40 CFR 60.392, as calculated, using the prescribed transfer efficiency of 40 CFR 60.393 (c)(1)(i)(C) for the monthly weighted average mass of VOC emittedpervolume ofapplied coating solids. iii. Record the temperature and frequency from Specific Condition S2.a.ii. 

### b. PM i. The owner or operator shall keep arecord that shows the date and the name ofthe person who inspected the filters and iffilters were replaced. ii. Proper operation of the fabric filter shall be ensured by maintaining records ofinspections and routine maintenance activities and shall make these records available to the District upon request. A demonstration that proper operation ofthe fabric filter has occurred satisfies this compliance requirement for the standard specified in S1.b.ii. above.
Page 76 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 c. Opacity See Specific Condition S3.b. d. HAP See LAP Ford Motor CompanyMACTRecordkeeping Section.
e. 

### NOx There are no record keeping requirements for NOx compliance. (See Comment 2) 

### f. TAC
1. The owner or operator shall keep a record of the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for each TAC-containingmaterial inthis emission unit.
11. The owner or operator shall maintain records that identify all periods of bypassing the control devices while the surface coating operations are in operation for a given day. The records shall include the date, duration (including start and stop time) ofeach bypass event, identification ofthe control device and process equipment in operation, and the total lb/hr emissions ofeach TAC from each piece ofequipment during each bypass event, if that control equipment is required to meet the EA goals. (See Comment 4) iii. See Specific Conditions S3.a.ii.(5) S4. Reporting (Regulation 2.16, section. 4.1.9.3)

SCH a. VOC i. See General PermitReporting Requirements. ii. For the control devices, the owner or operator shall clearly identify all deviations from permit requirements. If no deviations occur in that reporting period then the owner or operator shall report a negative declaration for the following category: 1) Emission Unit number and Control ID number; 2) The beginning and ending date ofthe reporting period; 3) Identification ofthe operatingparameters being monitored; 4) Number, duration, and cause ofall exceedances ofthe parameters; and 5) Description ofthe corrective action taken for each exceedance. Page 

### 77 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072

SCH 111. Perform record keeping for VOCs for 40 CFR 60.395 and 1.05, Section 4:



### b. PM 1) The owner or operator shall report the volume weighted average mass of VOC per volume of applied coating solids for each affected facility. 2) The owner or operator shall continuously record the incinerator combustion temperature during coating operations for thermal incineration or the gas temperature upstream and downstream of the incinerator catalyst bed during coating operations for catalytic incineration. 3) For thermal incinerators, every three-hour period shall be reported during which the average temperature measured is more than 28 

## oc less thanthe average temperature during the most recent control device performance test. 4) For catalytic incinerators, every three-hourperiod shall be reported during which the average temperature immediately before the catalyst bed, when the coating system is operational, is more than 28 

## oc less than the average temperature immediately before the catalyst bed during the most recent control device performance test at which destruction efficiency was determined. In addition, every three-hour period shall be reported each quarter during which the average temperature difference across the catalyst bed when the coating system is operational is less than 80 percent ofthe average temperature difference ofthe device during the most recent control device performance test at which destruction efficiency was determined. 5) Forthermal and catalytic incinerators, ifno such periods occur, the owner or operator shall submit a n.egative report. 6) The owner or operator shall notify the Administrator 30 days in advance ofanytest by Method 25.
Any deviation from the requirement to perform monthly visible inspections ofthe scuffbooth PM filter system.
c. Opacity See Specific Condition S4.b. d. HAP See LAP Ford Motor Company MACT Repmiing Requirements.
e. 

### NOx Page 78 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 There are no reporting requirements for NOx compliance. (See Comment 2) 

### f. TAC

1. The owner or operator shall submit a plant-wide emissions-based EA Demonstration to the District showing compliance with theplant-wide EA goals of 7.5 new and existing, 3.8 for all new combined, and 1 for each process when a change occurs that increases emissions above De minimus orpreviouslymodeled values.
n. Identification of all periods of bypassing the control devices while the surface coating operations were in operation during a reporting period. The report shall include the date, duration (including start and stop time) ofeach bypass event, and the totallb/hr emissions ofeach TAC from each piece ofequipment during each bypass event, ifthat control equipment is required to meetthe EA goals. (See Comment 4)

111. See Specific Conditions S4.a.ii. DOll Comments 1. Compliance with this requirement is demonstrated through a mass balance approach or engineering estimate. 2. The District has performed a one-time NOx compliance demonstration using AP-42 emission factors and combusting natural gas, and the emission standard cannot be exceeded. Therefore, there are no monitoring, record keeping, and reporting requirements with respect to NOx emission limits. 3. IfFord is in compliance with the 40 CFR 60 Subpart MM 60.3092 VOC limitthanthey are in compliance withRegulation 6.17, section 3.3 VOC limit. 4. The reported total lb/hr emissions of each TAC from each piece of equipment during each bypass event will be usedto determine ifeach TAC claimed as de minimis pursuant to Regulation 5.01 Section 1.6 in Ford Motor Company Louisville Assembly Plant's current plant-wide emissions-based EA demonstration continue to meet the de minimis criteria specified in Section 1.6.4. Should emissions during a bypass event for a TAC claimed to be de minimis exceedthe de minimis criteria, FordMotor Company Louisville Assembly Plant shall submit an updatedplant-wide emission-based EADemonstrationto the District showing compliance with the plant-wide EA goals of7.5 new and existing, 3.8 for all new combined, and 1 for each process where the TAC emissions increase above de minimis values.

SCH Page 79 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 U012 Emission Unit Description: Topcoat Operation U012 Applicable Regulations: Federally Enforceable Regulations Regulation Title Applicable Sections 1.05 Compliance with Emission Standards and 1, 3, 4 and 5 Maintenance Requirements 7.08 Standards ofPerformance for NewProcess 1through 3 Operations 7.01 General Provisions 7.2 40 CFR 60 General Provisions 60.1 through 60.18 Subpart A 40 CFR 60 National Emission Standards ofPerformance for SubpartMM Automobile and LightDutyTruck Surface 60.390 through 60.397 Coating Operations 40 CFR 63 General Provisions 63.1 through 63.16 SubpartA 40 CFR 63 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Subpart IIII Pollutants: Surface Coating ofAutomobiles and 1, 2, 3 ,4, 7 and 8 Light-Duty Trucks

SCH Page 80 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072
District Only Enforceable Regulations Regulation Subject Applicable Sections 1.18 Rule Effectiveness 1through 3 5.01 General Provisions 1through 4 5.02 Adoption ofNational Emission Standards for 1, 3, 4 and 5 Hazardous Air Pollutants 5.14 Hazardous AirPollutants and Source Categories 1 and 2 5.21 Environmental Acceptabilityfor ToxicAir 1through 5 Contaminants 5.22 Procedures for Determining the Maximum Ambient 1through 5 Concentration ofa Toxic Air Contaminant 5.23 Categories ofToxic Air Contaminants 1through 6 7.02 FederalNew Source Performance Standards 1.50, 2 , 3, 4 and 5 Incorporated byReference

SCH Page 81 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) U012 Emission Points: U012 Emission Points Description Applicable AllowableEmission/ Requirement Equipment Standard

40 CPR 60 SubpartMM See Specific Condition S1.a. 6.17 and 7.01 <20% 7.08 E12ANorth Main 2.34lb/hr Enamel Booth and a. 0.6 lbs HAP/GACS Air Supply Or b. 1.1 lbs HAPs/GACS 40 CPR 63 (the above limits are applicable to a Subpart IIII group ofemissions sources and are different depending upon whether compliance is demonstrated with (a) or without (b) Topcoat) 40 CPR60 SubpartMM See Specific Condition S1.a. 6.17 and 7.01 <20% 7.08 E12B NorthMain < 300ppm Enamel Oven c. 0.6 lbs HAP/GACS Or d. 1.1 lbs HAPs/GACS 40 CPR 63 (the above limits are applicable to a Subpart IIII group ofemissions sources and are different depending upon whether compliance is demonstrated with (a) or without (b) Topcoat)

SCH Page 82 of 130 Plant ID: 0072

Control Device

C12A, C12B C12C, C12H and C12G

C12D

03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072
U012 Emission Points Description Applicable Allowable Emission/ Control Requirement Equipment Standard Device

40 CFR60 SubpartMM See Specific Condition S1.a. 6.17 and 7.01 <20% 7.08 E12C South Main 2.34lb/hr Cl2C, C12E, Enamel Booth and Air a. 0.6 lbs HAP/GACS C12H and C12G SupplyHouse Or b. 1.1 lbs HAPs/GACS 40 CFR63 (the above limits are applicable to a Subpart IIII group ofemissions sources and are different depending upon whether compliance is demonstrated with (a) or without (b) Topcoat) 40 CFR60 SubpartMM See Specific Condition S1.a. 6.17 and 7.01 <20% 7.08 E12D SouthMain <300ppm C12D Enamel Oven c. 0.6 lbs HAP/GACS Or d. 1.1 lbs HAPs/GACS 40 CFR63 (the above limits are applicable to a Subpart IIII group ofemissions sources and are different depending upon whether compliance is demonstrated with (a) orwithout (b) Topcoat)

SCH Page 83 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072
U012 Emission Points Description Applicable Allowable Emission/ Control Requirement Equipment Standard Device

40 CPR 60 SubpartMM See Specific Condition S1.a. 6.17 and 7.01 <20% 7.08 E12E TuTone/Repair 2.34lb/hr TopcoatBooth and Air a. 0.6 lbs HAP/GACS Cl2P SupplyHouse Or b. 1.1 lbs HAPs/GACS 40 CPR 63 (the above limits are applicable to a Subpart IIII group ofemissions sources and are different depending upon whether compliance is demonstrated with (a) orwithout (b) Topcoat) 40 CPR 60 SubpartMM See Specific Condition S1.a. 6.17and7.01 <20% 7.08 E12P Tutone/Repair < 300 ppm Topcoat Oven c. 0.6 lbs HAP/GACS C12D Or d. 1.1 lbs HAPs/GACS 40 CPR 63 (the above limits are applicable to a Subpart IIII group ofemissions sources and are different depending upon whether compliance is demonstrated with (a) orwithout (b) Topcoat)

SCH Page 84 of 130 03-31-2011Permit No: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 U012 Emission Points Description Applicable AllowableEmission/ Control Requirement Equipment Standard Device

40 CFR60 SubpartMM See Specific Condition Sl.a. 6.17 and 7.01 EllE/E12G a. 0.6 lbs HAP/GACS Guidecoat/Topcoat Or N/A Kitchen b. 1.1 lbs HAPs/GACS 40 CFR 63 (the above limits are applicable to a Subpart IIII group ofemissions sources and are different depending upon whether compliance is demonstrated with (a) or without (b) Topcoat) E12H Topcoat Scuff <20% 7.08 C19A Booth 2.34 lb/hr E12ITuTone/Repair <20% 7.08 C20A ScuffBooth 2.34 lb/hr
U12 Control Devices: Description Performance ID Indicator StackiD C12A, C12B Water Wash, two (2) Carbon Adsorber and two (2) C12C, C12H Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer Temperature S- to S090

and C12G (RTO) C12C, C12E, Two (2) Regenerative Thermal S-150 to S-174, S- Oxidizer (RTO) ,Water Wash and Temperature C12H and C12G CarbonAdsorber 193, S-194 and S-203 Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer Temperature S-404, S-408, S-409 C12D (RTO) and S-215 C12F Water Wash N/A S-110 to S124 and S410 C19A DryPanel Filter N/A S-183 and S-184 C20A Dry Panel Filter N/A S-185 and S-186

SCH Page 85 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 U012 Specific Conditions S1. Standards (Regulation 2.16, section 4.1.1)

SCH a. VOC

b. i. The owner or operator shall be subject to the limit of 1.47 kg VOC/1 (12.3 lb VOC/gal) ofapplied coating solids, less water and exempt solvents. ( 40 CPR 60.392) (See Comment 3) ii. The owner or operator shall be subject to the limit of 11.3 lb VOC/gal of applied coating solids, less water and exempt solvents. (Regulation 7.01 section 7.2 and Regulation 6.17, section 3.3)
111. See Louisville Assembly Plant, Ford Motor ComQany Plant-wide AQQlicability Limit (PAL). PM
1. See Louisville Assembly Plant, Ford Motor Com12any Plant-wide AQQlicability Limit 

### CPAL). ii. The owner or operator shall not allow PM emissions to exceed 2.34 lb/hr. (Regulation 7.08, section 3.1.2) (See Comment 1)
111. The owner or operator shall not operate the booths unless the particulate filters are installed and operatingproperly.

c. Opacity The owner or operator shall not allow visible emissions to equal or exceed 20% opacity. (Regulation 7.08, section 3.1.1) 

### d. HAP See LAP Ford Motor ComQany MACT Standards Section.


### e. NOx The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any affected facility or from any airpollution control equipment installed on any affected facility anyNOx fumes in excess of300 ppm by volume expressed as N02. (Regulation 7.08, section 4) (See Comment 2) 

### f. TAC Page 86 of 130 03-31-2011

### Permit No: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 1. 

### The owner or operator shall not allow any TAC emissions to exceed environmentally acceptable levels whether specifically established by modeling or derived from default de minimis levels. (Regulation 5.01, .section 3.)
11. 

### The owner or operator shall utilize the control devices at all times the surface coating operations are in operation ifthe control device reductions were used to demonstrate compliance and shall, maintain and operate any affected facility including associated air pollution control equipment in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practice for minimizing emissions. (Regulation 5.21, section 4.7) S2. Monitoring 

### (Regulation 2.16, section 4.1.9.1.2)

SCH a. VOC

1. 

### Monitor ongoing compliance by calculating monthly, a daily volumeweighted average of the coatings used. Procedures used for this determination shall be those of "Protocol for Determining Daily Volatile Organic Compound Emission Rate ofAutomobile and Light-Duty Truck Topcoat Operations," EPA-450/3-88-018 (Docket ID No. OAR-2002- 0093 and Docket ID 

### No. A-2001-22). ii. The owner or operator shall during operation of any coating operation(s) for which emission reductions due to the use ofadd-on control equipment are relied upon to demonstrate compliance with the emission limits above, maintain the afterburners combustion chamber temperature**at~** 

### 760° C or other temperature, as determined during the latest stack test, based upon a three hour average, and maintain a combustion chambertemperature ofno more than 28°C (50°F) below the average combustion temperature. In addition, the afterburners shall have a minimum residence time of 0.5 seconds. The temperature shall be recorded using a recorder, which shall be calibrated and maintained according to the manufacturer's specifications. Temperature measurements of the thermal oxidizer combustion chamber shall be made at least once every 15 minutes and recorded during operation ofthe associated coating operations.

111. 

### If necessary for purposes of compliance, this line shall not be operated unless all control devices are beingproperly operated.
IV. 

### Use EPA Method 24 to determine the amount ofVOC in the Coating. The following equation may be used as an alternate method to demonstrate compliance:

Page 87 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072

SCH Where: n 

### V. C. 

# voc =**s-~ -~**  w 

# v i=l t

VOCw 

### = the daily weighted average coating VOC content, as applied; and less water and exempt solvents, expressed in pounds of VOC per gallon ofcoating.

n 

### = number ofdifferent coatings used on a coating line a given day. V 1 = the volume ofeach coating used on a coating line, as applied and less water and exempt solvents, a given day. C 1 the VOC content ofeach coating used on a coating line, as applied and less water and exempt solvents, a given day. 

### Vt 

### = total volume ofall coatings applied each day on a coating line, less water and exempt solvents.
v. Meet the standards specified in 40 CFR 60.392, as calculated, using the prescribed transfer efficiency of 40 CFR 60.393(c)(1)(i)(C) for the monthly weighted average mass of VOC emitted per volume of applied coating solids. b. PM The owner or operator shall follow good operating practices for the particulate filers, including monthly inspection, routine maintenance as recommended by the manufacturer, and promptrepair ofany defects.
c. Opacity See Specific Condition S2.b. d. HAP See LAP FordMotor CompanyMACTMonitoring Section.

e. 

### NOx There are no monitoring requirements for NOx compliance. (See Comment 2) 

### f. TAC Page 88 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 1. See Specific Condition S2.a.ii and iii.
11. See Specific Condition S3.f. S3. Record Keeping (Regulation 2.16, section 4.1.9.2)

SCH a. VOC
1. The owner or operator shall maintain the following records: (40 CFR 60.395 and 1.05, Section 4) 1) Record daily the quantity and type of paint withdrawn from the topcoat paint circulation system for use in the final repair operation. 2) Determine daily VOC emissions based on the topcoat and final repair records. 3) As an alternative to daily material usage records, the owner or operator may utilize material usage factor of 0.5% of topcoat usage. 4) Calculations shall incorporate control efficiency and shall include downtime adjustments to account for increased emissions during the period the afterburners were not operating. The owner or operator shall also maintain records ofcontrol devices downtimes and bypasses, includingthe date and duration ofeach occurrence. ii. The owner or operator shall continuously record the incinerator combustiontemperature during coating operations for thermal incineration or the gas temperature upstream and downstream of the incinerator catalyst bed during coating operations for catalytic incineration
111. Record the temperature and frequency during operation of any coating operation specified in Specific Condition S2.a.ii. b. 

### PM
1. The owner or operator shall keep a record that shows the date and the name ofthe person who inspectedthe filters and iffilters were replaced.
11. Proper operation of the fabric filter shall be ensured by maintaining records of inspections and routine maintenance activities and shall make these records available to the District upon request. A demonstration that proper operation ofthe fabric filter has occurred satisfies this compliance requirement for the standard specified in Sl.b.ii. above. Page 89 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072

c. Opacity See Specific Condition S3.b. d. HAP See LAP FordMotor CompanyMACTRecordkeeping Section.

e. 

### NOx There are no record keepingrequirements for NOx compliance. (See Comment 2) 

### f. TAC
1. The owner or operator shall keep a record of the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for each TAC-containingmaterial in this emission unit.
11. The owner or operator shall maintain records that identify all periods of bypassing the control devices while the surface coating operations are in operation for a given day. The records shall include the date, duration (including start and stop time) ofeach bypass event, identification ofthe control device and process equipment in operation, and the total lb/hr emissions ofeach TAC from each piece ofequipment during each bypass event, if that control equipment is required to meet the EA goals. (See Comment4) iii. See Specific Conditions S3.a.i.(4) S4. Reporting (Regulation 2.16, section. 4.1.9.3)

SCH a. VOC
1. See General PermitReporting Requirements.
11. For the control devices, the owner or operator shall clearly identify all deviations from permit requirements. If no deviations occur in that reporting period then the owner or operator shall report a negative declaration includingthe following information: 1) Emission Unit number and Control ID number; 2) The beginning and ending date ofthe reportingperiod; 3) Identification ofthe operatingparameters being monitored; 4) Number, duration, and cause ofall exceedances ofthe parameters; and 5) Description ofthe corrective action taken for each exceedance. Page 90 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072

SCH 111. Perform reporting for VOCs for 40 CPR 60.395 and 1.05, Section 4: 1) The owner or operator shall report the volume weighted average mass of VOC per volume of applied coating solids for each affected facility. 2) For thermal incinerators, every three-hour period shall be reported during which the average temperature measured is more than 28 

## oc less than the average temperature during the most recent control device performance test. 3) For catalytic incinerators, every three-hourperiod shall be reported during which the average temperature immediately before the catalyst bed, when the coating system is operational, is more than 28 

## oc less than the average temperature immediately before the catalyst bed during the most recent control device performance test at which destruction efficiency was determined. In addition, every three-hour period shall be reported each quarter during which the average temperature difference across the catalyst bed when the coating system is operational is less than 80 percent ofthe average temperature difference ofthe device during the most recent control device performance test at which destruction efficiency was determined. 4) Forthermal and catalytic incinerators, ifno such periods occur, the owner or operator shall submit a negative report. 5) The owner or operator shall notify the Administrator 30 days in advance ofany test byMethod 25.
IV. Report all instances ofnon-complianceto the District no later than (15) days after the occurrence has been confirmed, notwithstandingRegulation 1.07. 

### b. PM Any deviation from the requirement to perform monthly visible inspections ofthe scuffbooth PMfilter system.
c. Opacity See Specific Condition S4.b. d. HAP See LAP FordMotor CompanyMACTReporting Requirements.

e. 

### NOx Page 91 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) Plant ID: 0072 There are no reporting requirements for NOx compliance. (See Comment 2) 

### f. TAC

1. The owner or operator shall submit a plant-wide emissions-based EA Demonstration to the District showing compliance with theplant-wide EA goals of 7.5 new and existing, 3.8 for all new combined, and 1 for each process when a change occurs that increases emissions above De minimus orpreviously modeled values.

11. Identification of all periods of bypassing the control devices while the surface coating operations were in operation during a reporting period. The report shall include the date, duration (including start and stop time) ofeach bypass event, and the totallb/hremissions ofeach TAC from each piece ofequipment during each bypass event, ifthat control equipment is required to meetthe EA goals. (See Comment 4)

111. See Specific Conditions S4.a.ii. U012 Comments 1. Compliance with this requirement is demonstrated through a mass balance approach or engineering estimate. 2. The District has performed a one-time NOx compliance demonstration using AP-42 emission factors and combusting natural gas, and the emission standard cannot be exceeded. Therefore, there are no monitoring, record keeping, and reporting requirements with respect to NOx emission limits. 3. IfFord is in compliance with Regulation 6.17, section 3.3 VOC limit than they are in compliance with the 40 CPR 60 Subpart MM 60.3092 VOC limit. 4. The reported total lb/hr emissions of each TAC from each piece of equipment during each bypass event will be used to determine ifeach TAC claimed as de minimis pursuant to Regulation 5.01 Section 1.6 in Ford Motor Company Louisville Assembly Plant's current plant-wide emissions-based EA demonstration continue to meet the de minimis criteria specified in Section 1.6.4. Should emissions during a bypass event for a TAC claimedto be de minimis exceedthe de minimis criteria, Ford Motor Company Louisville Assembly Plant shall submit an updated plant-wide emission-based EADemonstration to the District showing compliance with the plant-wide EA goals of7.5 new and existing, 3.8 for all new combined, and 1 for each process where the TAC emissions increase above de minimis values.

SCH Page 92 of 130 03-31-2011PermitNo: 147-97-TV (R2) PlantID: 0072 U013 Emission Unit Description: Plant-wide Gasoline Fueling Federally EnforceableRegulations Regulation Title Applicable Sections 1.05 Compliance with Emission Standards and 1, 3, 4 and 5 Maintenance Requirements 7.15 Standards ofPerformance for NewProcess 1through 6 Operations U013 Applicable Regulations:
District Only Enforceable Regulations Regulation Title Applicable Sections 1.18 Rule Effectiveness 1through 3 5.01 General Provisions 1through 4 5.14 Hazardous AirPollutants and Source Categories 1 and 2 Methodologyfor DeterminingBenchmark 5.20 Ambient Concentration ofa Toxic Air 1through 6 Contaminant 5.21 Environmental Acceptability for Toxic Air 1through 5 Contaminants Procedures for Determiningthe Maximum 5.22 Ambient Concentration ofa Toxic Air 1through 5 Contaminant 5.23 Categories ofToxic Air Contaminants 1through 6

SCH Page 93 of 130 03-31-2011