alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.5

                                    ALLONGE
                                       TO
                            SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

          Reference is hereby made to that certain Secured Promissory Note,
dated November 12, 1999, in the original principal amount of Seven Hundred
Thousand Dollars ($700,000), made by the undersigned to the order of
InternetStudios.com, Inc., a Nevada corporation, to which this Allonge is
attached, as amended by that certain Allonge, dated November 18, 1999, modifying
the principal amount thereof to One Million Forty Thousand Dollars ($1,040,000)
(as amended, the "Note").  All capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise
defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Note.

          The Note is hereby amended by changing the original principal amount
thereof from One Million Forty Thousand Dollars ($1,040,000) to One Million Two
Hundred Ninety-One Thousand Six Hundred Thirty-five Dollars ($1,291,635), and
accordingly all references therein to "One Million Forty Thousand Dollars
($1,040,000)" are hereby deleted, and "One Million Two Hundred Ninety-One
Thousand Six Hundred Thirty-five Dollars ($1,291,635)" shall be inserted in lieu
thereof.

          The undersigned acknowledges that all amounts payable by the
undersigned to Lender under the Note, as increased by this Allonge, are secured
by a first priority security interest of Lender in the Collateral.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Allonge,
effective as of December 16, 1999.


                                    MEDIACHASE LTD., a Delaware corporation

                                    By: /s/ Melanie Lutz
                                       ------------------------------------
                                        Name: Melanie Lutz
                                        Title:
SEC Advisory Committee on Small and Emerging Companies

Disclosure Effectiveness

July 15, 2015 Discussion Outline

Reference is made to the Committee’s recommendations made to the Commission on February 1, 

2013. 

• The Committee believes that expanding the scaled and other regulatory relief provided to 

smaller reporting companies to include some of the regulatory relief provided to 

emerging growth companies under the JOBS Act would be helpful to facilitate innovation 

and job creation by smaller companies without adversely affecting investor protection.

o Revise the definition of smaller reporting company to include companies with a 

public float of up to $250 million.

o Conduct of shareholder advisory votes on executive compensation and on the 

frequency of such votes.

o Disclosure about and shareholder advisory votes on golden parachute 

compensation.

o Disclosure of ratio of median annual total compensation of all employees to total 

annual compensation of the CEO.

o Relationship between executive compensation and issuer financial performance.

o Compliance with new accounting standards on date private companies are 

required to comply.

o Mandatory audit firm rotation and auditor discussion and analysis.

• Revise the definition of “accelerated filer” to include companies with a public float of 

$250 million or more or more, but less than $700 million.

• The Committee believes that regulatory relief should be provided to smaller reporting 

companies with respect to the Commission’s other disclosure requirements that place a 

disproportionate burden on smaller reporting companies in terms of cost of, and time 

spent on, compliance without a corresponding benefit to investors.

o Filing of schedules to material contracts

o XBRL
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

May 11, 2021

In the Matter of

FlatWorld Acquisition Corp.,

File No. 500-1

ORDER OF SUSPENSION OF

TRADING

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of FlatWorld Acquisition 

Corp. (“FWLAF1”) (CIK No. 1499573), a British Virgin Islands corporation located in Road 

Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands with a class of securities registered with the Commission 

pursuant to Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") Section 12(g) because it is 

delinquent in its periodic filings with the Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since 

it filed a Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2019. On November 13, 2020, the 

Commission’s Division of Corporation Finance (“Corporation Finance”) sent a delinquency 

letter to FWLAF requesting compliance with its periodic filing requirements, which was 

delivered. As of May 6, 2021, the common stock of FWLAF was quoted on OTC Link operated 

by OTC Markets Group Inc. (formerly “Pink Sheets”) (“OTC Link”), had five market makers, 

and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11(f)(3). 

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors 

require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company. Therefore, it is 

ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the 

 

1 The short form of each issuer’s name is also its stock symbol.
2

securities of the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EST on May 

12, 2021, through 11:59 p.m. EST on May 25, 2021.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary
Case 16-33676-KRH Doc 98 Filed 06/26/20 Entered 06/26/20 07:48:44 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENTS OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-109955 and
333-57138) and on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-32543, 333-80457 and 333-32868) of The Hertz Corporation of our report dated
April 4, 2006, relating to the Predecessor financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Florham Park, New Jersey
April 4, 2006

We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-109955 and 333-57138) and on
Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-32543, 333-80457 and 333-32868) of The Hertz Corporation of our report dated April 4, 2006 relating to the
Successor financial statements, financial statement schedule, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Florham Park, NJ
April 4, 2006

---



QuickLinks
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

Release No. 9695 / December 22, 2014

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-16173

 

 

In the Matter of 

the Registration Statement of

Esir1, Inc.

433 North Camden Drive

6th Floor

Beverly Hills, CA 90210

NOTICE THAT INITIAL DECISION HAS BECOME FINAL

The time for filing a petition for review of the initial decision in this proceeding has 

expired. No such petition has been filed by Esir1, Inc., and the Commission has not chosen to 

review the decision on its own initiative.

Accordingly, notice is hereby given, pursuant to Rule 360(d) of the Commission's Rules 

of Practice,1that the initial decision of the administrative law judge,

2

has become the final 

decision of the Commission with respect to Esir1, Inc. The order contained in that decision is

hereby declared effective. The initial decision ordered that, pursuant to Section 8(d) of the 

Securities Act of 1933, the effectiveness of the registration statement filed by Esir1, Inc., be, and 

hereby is, suspended.

For the Commission, by the Office of the General Counsel, pursuant to delegated 

authority.

Brent J. Fields

 Secretary

 

1

17 C.F.R. § 201.360(d).

2

Esir1, Inc., Initial Decision Rel. No. 702 (Oct. 24, 2014), 110 SEC Docket 01, 2014 WL

5408504.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 98-3203MN

_____________ Lawrence Norman Main, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District v. * of Minnesota. * Donald Romine, Warden; United States * [UNPUBLISHED] of America, * * Appellees. *

_____________ Submitted: January 28, 1999

Filed: February 4, 1999

_____________ Before FAGG, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. LawrenceNorman Main, a federal inmate, appeals the district court's dismissal of Main's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. Having considered the record and Main's arguments, we conclude the district court's decision is clearly correct. We thus affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 474 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 474

To authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel in the case of 
             Martin F. McMahon v. Senator Ted Cruz, et al.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 16, 2020

 Mr. Schumer submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel in the case of 
             Martin F. McMahon v. Senator Ted Cruz, et al.

Whereas, Senators Ted Cruz, Lindsey Graham, Mitch McConnell, and Rand Paul have 
        been named as defendants in the case of Martin F. McMahon v. Senator Ted 
        Cruz, et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-03774-TSC, currently pending in the 
        United States District Court for the District of Columbia;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(1), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to defend Members of the Senate in civil actions 
        relating to their official responsibilities: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent 
Senators Ted Cruz, Lindsey Graham, Mitch McConnell, and Rand Paul, and 
any other Member who may be named as a defendant in the case of Martin 
F. McMahon v. Senator Ted Cruz, et al.
                                 <all>
```
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4711 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny any deduction for 

advertising prescription drugs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 17, 2019 

Mr. LIPINSKI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny any 

deduction for advertising prescription drugs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Tax Breaks for 

5 Drug Ads Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DENIAL OF DEDUCTION FOR ADVERTISING PRE7 SCRIPTION DRUGS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part IX of subchapter B of chap9 ter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4711 IH

1 items not deductible) is amended by adding at the end 

2 the following new section: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 280I. DENIAL OF DEDUCTION FOR ADVERTISING PRE4 SCRIPTION DRUGS. 

5 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—No deduction shall be allowed 

6 under this chapter with respect to— 

7 ‘‘(1) any advertisement primarily for purposes 

8 of promoting the sale or use of any prescribed drug 

9 (as defined in section 213(d)(3)), and 

10 ‘‘(2) any of the following incurred or provided 

11 primarily for purposes described in paragraph (1): 

12 ‘‘(A) Travel expenses (including meals and 

13 lodging). 

14 ‘‘(B) Goods or services of a type generally 

15 considered to constitute entertainment, amuse16 ment, or recreation or the use of a facility in 

17 connection with providing such goods and serv18 ices. 

19 ‘‘(C) Gifts. 

20 ‘‘(D) Other promotion expenses. 

21 ‘‘(b) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary shall prescribe 

22 such regulations as may be necessary to carry out the pur23 poses of this section.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4711 IH

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

2 for such part IX is amended by adding at the end the 

3 following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 280I. Denial of deduction for advertising prescription drugs.’’. 

4 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

5 this section shall apply to amounts paid or incurred after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act in taxable years end7 ing after such date. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 189 

Condemning all forms of antisemitism. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 2, 2019 

Mr. CRUZ (for himself, Mr. KAINE, Mr. CRAMER, Ms. ROSEN, Mr. YOUNG, 

Mr. COONS, Mr. RUBIO, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, Mr. COTTON, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. HAWLEY, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, 

Mr. BRAUN, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. RISCH, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. ISAKSON, 

Mr. BLUNT, Mr. ROMNEY, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. MORAN, Ms. COLLINS, 

Mr. ROUNDS, Mr. WICKER, Mrs. FISCHER, Ms. ERNST, Mr. ROBERTS, 

Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. DAINES, Ms. MCSALLY, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. TOOMEY, 

Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. PERDUE, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. 

LANKFORD, Mr. ENZI, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Ms. BALDWIN, 

Ms. HASSAN, Mr. JONES, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. WARNER, Mr. SANDERS, 

Mr. CASEY, Mr. UDALL, Mr. GARDNER, and Mr. SCHUMER) submitted 

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JUNE 13, 2019 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Condemning all forms of antisemitism. 

Whereas antisemitism is a unique form of prejudice stretching back millennia that attacks the equal humanity of the 

Jewish people; 

Whereas antisemitism has long perpetrated myths about 

Jews, including the Russian fabrication of the Protocols 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

SRES 189 ATS 

of the Elders of Zion and the wide circulation of libelous 

falsehoods about the Jewish murder of infants; 

Whereas, in its most extreme form, antisemitism aims at the 

physical destruction of the Jewish people, as seen in pogroms, forced conversions and Nazi Germany’s murder of 

over six million Jews; 

Whereas antisemitism has included attacks on the livelihood 

of Jews including prohibitions on land ownership, campaigns to boycott, confiscate or destroy Jewish businesses, and denial of the ability of Jews to practice certain professions; 

Whereas, in the United States, Jews have suffered from systematic discrimination in the form of exclusion from 

home ownership in certain neighborhoods, prohibition 

from staying in certain hotels, restrictions upon membership in private clubs and other associations, limitations 

upon admission to certain educational institutions and 

other barriers to equal justice under the law; 

Whereas, in the United States, Jews have faced, and continue 

to face, false accusations of divided loyalty between the 

United States and Israel, false claims that they purchase 

political power with money, and false accusations about 

control of the financial system, along with other negative 

stereotypes; and 

Whereas Jews are the targets of the majority of hate crimes 

committed in the United States against any religious 

group, including attacks on houses of worship and Jewish 

community centers: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the United States Senate condemns 

2 and commits to combatting all forms of antisemitism. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### Seth Glanville *v.*John Rittlesdorf *et al.*

1. Trespass quake clausum *freght—title in severalty not inconsistent with joint possession.*The fact that two persons own land in severalty is not inconsistent with the idea of their joint possession.

3. In an action of trespass *quare clausum*fregit, by two plaintiffs, the question as to whether the possession of the plaintiffs is joint or several is one of fact for the determination of the jury; and the fact that they may own the land in severalty does not preclude the idea of a joint possession.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jo Daviess county; the Hon. William Brown, Judge, presiding.

Messrs. W. Weigley & Son, for the appellant.

Messrs. D. & T. J. Sheean, and Mr. G. O. Barnes, for the appellees.

Mr. Justice Scott

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This, was an action of trespass *quare clausum fregit.*The declaration is in the usual form, and to it appellant, who was defendant in the court below, filed two pleas: 1st, a plea of not guilty; and, 2d, a special plea, setting up there was a public highway over and through the *locxts in*quo, upon which issue was joined. The special plea was withdrawn after the second trial, and a third trial was had upon the issue joined upon the plea of not guilty, which resulted in a verdict of guilty, and assessing appellee’s damages at $1.30. A motion for a new trial was made, and, thereupon, appellees remitted of the verdict $1.29 of the damages found. The court then overruled the motion for a new trial, and entered judgment on the verdict for one cent damages and costs of suit. Appellant brings the cause to this court on appeal, and seeks a reversal of the judgment. principally for the reason, as he alleges, it is not shown appellees had joint possession of the premises where the *476alleged trespasses were committed so as to enable them to maintain the action in their joint names.

It is claimed, appellees owned the land in the inclosure in severalty, a.nd, hence, it is insisted, notwithstanding they may have united in erecting the fences, their possession was not joint. The instructions given by the court on this point were as liberal for appellant as he could ask. There is some evidence in the record, although it is slight, that tends to show joint possession by appellees. They united in erecting the fences that inclose the premises. That appellees owned the land constituting the inclosure in severalty, is not inconsistent with the idea of .joint possession. Neither party may have had any interest in the realty, or the fee might have been in one of them, and still the possession might have been joint. Whether the character of the possession was joint or several, was a question of fact, and was fairly submitted to the jury, under proper instructions of the court. Three juries have found the issues for appellees. It must be conceded, the evidence that supports the finding is slight, but in view of the fact the damages are nominal, no sufficient reason appears for setting the verdict aside. The objection at most is purely a technical one, and does not go to the merits of the defense.

The judgment must be affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
### §460vv–11. Timber management report

The Secretary of Agriculture shall submit to the Committee on Natural Resources and the Committee on Agriculture of the United States House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources and the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the United States Senate a report on the timber management program on those lands of the Ouachita National Forest located in Le Flore County, Oklahoma, each year after October 18, 1988, for a period of 20 years. Each such report shall include information on timber management practices, sale preparation, harvest levels, reforestation, forest pest and damage problems, multiple use mitigation practices, including wildlife enhancement, recreation, protection of scenery, vegetation conversion, roads, and vegetative cover along streams, roads and trails. The report shall also include an economic impact statement of the Ouachita National Forest in Le Flore County, Oklahoma, on the timber industry and the tourism and recreation industry.

(Pub. L. 100–499, §13, Oct. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 2497; Pub. L. 103–437, §6(d)(20), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4584.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–437 substituted "Natural Resources" for "Interior and Insular Affairs" after "Committee on".
### §410ww–5. Cooperation of Federal agencies

Any Federal entity conducting or supporting activities directly affecting the park shall—

(1) consult with, cooperate with, and to the maximum extent practicable, coordinate its activities with the Secretary; and

(2) conduct or support such activities in a manner which—

(A) to the maximum extent practicable is consistent with the standards and criteria established pursuant to section 410ww–22(b)(9) of this title; and

(B) to the maximum extent practicable will not have an adverse effect on the historic resources of the park.

(Pub. L. 102–419, title I, §106, Oct. 16, 1992, 106 Stat. 2143.)
### §5105. State noncompliance with coastal fishery management plans

#### (a) Noncompliance determination

The Commission shall determine that a State is not in compliance with the provisions of a coastal fishery management plan if it finds that the State has not implemented and enforced such plan within the timeframes established under the plan or under section 5104 of this title.

#### (b) Notification

Upon making any determination under subsection (a), the Commission shall within 10 working days notify the Secretaries of such determination. Such notification shall include the reasons for making the determination and an explicit list of actions that the affected State must take to comply with the coastal fishery management plan. The Commission shall provide a copy of the notification to the affected State.

#### (c) Withdrawal of noncompliance determination

After making a determination under subsection (a), the Commission shall continue to monitor State implementation and enforcement. Upon finding that a State has complied with the actions required under subsection (b), the Commission shall immediately withdraw its determination of noncompliance. The Commission shall promptly notify the Secretaries of such withdrawal.

(Pub. L. 103–206, title VIII, §806, Dec. 20, 1993, 107 Stat. 2451.)
### §517. Title to lands to be acquired

The Secretary of Agriculture may do all things necessary to secure the safe title in the United States to the lands to be acquired under this Act, but no payment shall be made for any such lands until the title shall be satisfactory to the Attorney General or his designee and shall be vested in the United States.

(Mar. 1, 1911, ch. 186, §8 (part), 36 Stat. 962; Pub. L. 91–393, §3, Sept. 1, 1970, 84 Stat. 835.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, means act Mar. 1, 1911, ch. 186, 36 Stat. 961, popularly known as the Weeks Law, which enacted this section, former sections 513 and 514 of this title, and sections 515, 516, 517a to 519, 521, 552, and 563 of this title and amended sections 480 and 500 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 552 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was amended by act Dec. 11, 1926, ch. 5, 44 Stat. 919. The amendment added a proviso at the end of this section which is set out as section 517a of this title.

#### Amendments

1970—Pub. L. 91–393 inserted "or his designee" after "Attorney General".