alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

_________________________

No. 06

- 12

- 00077

- CV

______________________________

IN RE: J.K

. , A MINOR CHILD

On Appeal from the Fifth Judicial District Court

Cass County, Texas

Trial Court No. 04

- C

- 687

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

Tiffany Nicole Morton , appellant, filed her pro se notice of appeal July 24, 2012

.

She has neither filed a docketing statement, nor has she paid the filing fee. Morton has

also not filed a proof of indigency in lieu of a filing fee. Therefore, Morton is responsible for

payment of the filing fee. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1; app. A (B)(1).

On August 28, 2012 , we contacted Morton by letter, giving her an opportunity to cure the

various defects, and warning her that if we did not receive an adequate respo nse within ten days,

this appeal would be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(b),

(c).

Morton informed us that the filing fee would be mailed on September 13. That fee has

not been received. Pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 42.3(b), we dismiss this appeal for want of

prosecution.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: September 25, 2012

Date Decided: September 26, 2012
#### § 140.902 Applicability.

This subpart, and all references hereinafter made to “projects,” applies to Federal-aid projects involving railroad facilities, including projects for the elimination of hazards of railroad-highway crossings, and other projects which use railroad properties or which involve adjustments required by highway construction to either railroad facilities or facilities that are jointly owned or used by railroad and utility companies.
```
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 33-68196 on Form S-8 dated September 1, 1993, Registration Statement No. 333-63597 on Form S-8 dated September 17, 1998 and Registration Statement No. 333-125672 on Form S-8 dated June 9, 2005 of our report on the consolidated financial statements and report as to schedules included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hickok Incorporated for the year ended September 30, 2010./s/ Meaden & Moore, Ltd.MEADEN & MOORE, Ltd.    Certified Public AccountantsDecember 20, 2010Cleveland, Ohio
```
Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18, U.S.C, SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTEDAS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Golden Sand Eco-Protection, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Charles Scheuerman, President and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 24, 2004

                                               GOLDEN SAND ECO-PROTECTION, INC.

                                               By:      /s/ Charles Scheuerman
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Charles Scheuerman, President &
                                                 Chairman
### §410vv–7. General management plan

Not later than 3 complete fiscal years after August 26, 1992, the Secretary shall develop and transmit a general management plan for the park to the Committee on Natural Resources of the United States House of Representatives and to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the United States Senate.

(Pub. L. 102–350, §9, Aug. 26, 1992, 106 Stat. 936; Pub. L. 103–437, §6(d)(14), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4584.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–437 substituted "Natural Resources" for "Interior and Insular Affairs" after "Committee on".
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0519

_________________

NENA S. KRUGER,

 Petitioner and Appellant,

 v.

DALE R. KRUGER,

 Respondent and Appellee.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Christopher D. Abbott, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 2 2021

06/02/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0519
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Harvey Electronics, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended October 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Joseph J. Calabrese,
Chief Financial Officer certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
     of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









/s/ Joseph J. Calabrese
-----------------------
Joseph J. Calabrese
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer & Secretary
January 28, 2005



<PAGE>
### §519a. Transfer of forest reservation lands for military purposes

If any of the lands purchased or to be purchased by the United States under the provisions of the Act approved March 1, 1911, as amended, within the limits of townships 1, 2, and 3 north, ranges 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13, in Forest and Perry Counties, State of Mississippi, are determined to be chiefly valuable and necessary for a National Guard encampment and related military purposes, the Secretary of Agriculture may, and he is, authorized to convey full title to said lands to the State of Mississippi or the Department of the Army: Provided, That there is paid into the Treasury of the United States, or made available by transfer on the books of said Treasury, sums of money equal to the full amounts expended by the Department of Agriculture for the purchase of said lands, and the money so paid into or transferred on the books of the Treasury shall be available for expenditure by the Secretary of Agriculture for the purchase of other lands under the provisions of said Act of March 1, 1911, as amended.

(Mar. 2, 1935, ch. 21, 49 Stat. 37; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act approved March 1, 1911, as amended, referred to in text, is act Mar. 1, 1911, ch. 186, 36 Stat. 961, popularly known as the Weeks Law, which enacted former sections 513 and 514 and sections 515 to 519, 521, 552, and 563 of this title and amended sections 480 and 500 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 552 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

The words "with the consent and approval of the National Forest Reservation Commission established by section 4 of said Act of March 1, 1911 [16 U.S.C. 513]", which appeared immediately following the first reference to the Secretary of Agriculture, have been omitted as obsolete. Section 4 of the 1911 Act was repealed, and all functions of the National Forest Reservation Commission were transferred to the Secretary of Agriculture, by section 17(a)(1) of Pub. L. 94–588, Oct. 22, 1976, 90 Stat. 2961.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, enacted "Title 10, Armed Forces" which in sections 3010 to 3013 continued military Department of the Army under administrative supervision of Secretary of the Army.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.23

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

                             LOAN DATE: June 1, 1999

                            PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: $37,500

                           INTEREST RATE: 6% PER ANNUM

         FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Amy Wagner-Mele ("Borrower"),
promises to pay Frontline Communications Corp. ("Lender") the principal amount
of thirty-seven thousand five hundred dollars ($37,500), together with interest
on the unpaid principal balance from June 1, 1999 until paid in full.

         Payment.  Borrower will pay this loan in one principal payment plus
interest on or before June 1, 2002

         Collateral. Fifteen thousand (15,000) shares of Frontline
Communications Corp. common stock held by the Borrower, right to payment under
the Borrower's three (3) year employment contract with Frontline Communications
Corp. dated September 2, 1998, and certain personal assets of the Borrower as
set forth in Exhibit A.


Borrower:


------------------------------
Amy Wagner-Mele
#### UNITED STATES of America, Government-Appellant, v. Marion FRAMPTON, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 01-1487.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 22, 2002.

*814Barbara D. Cottrell, Esq., U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of New York, Albany, NY, for Government-Appellant.

Paul J. Evangelista, Esq., Federal Public Defender, Albany, NY, for DefendantAppellee.

Present JAMES L. OAKES, and ROBERT A. KATZMANN, Circuit Judges, and J. GARVAN MURTHA,1 District Judge.

1

. The Honorable J. Garvan Murtha, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Vermont, sitting by designation.

SUMMARY ORDER

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

The United States appeals the decision of the District Court to suppress a firearm seized from defendant Marion Frampton on the grounds that the firearm was seized during a detention of the defendant that violated the Fourth Amendment. Possession of the suppressed firearm is the basis for this prosecution pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), 924(a)(2), and we review the suppression of evidence at this time pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3731.

After careful consideration of the arguments advanced by both parties, we affirm the District Court’s suppression of the weapon substantially for the reasons stated in the District Court’s thoughtful Memorandum Decision and Order dated August 29, 2001. We note that the factors cited by the government as providing a basis for probable cause, even when viewed in tandem, *see U.S. v. Arvizu,*534 U.S. 266, 122 S.Ct. 744, 751-52, 151 L.Ed.2d 740 (2002), do not provide such a basis. None of the factors pointed to by the government here (unlike in Arvizu) relate to the defendant’s behavior.2 In the words of the District Court, “there was nothing about Defendant’s demeanor or his behavior sufficient to warrant a reasonable suspicion that Defendant [was], ha[d] been, or [was] about to be engaged in criminal activity.” The factors relied upon by the government amount to little more than guilt by reputation and association, and do not amount to “a reasonable, particular suspicion that criminal activity is afoot.” *Illinois v. Wardlow,*528 U.S. 119, 123, 120 S.Ct. 673, 145 L.Ed.2d 570 (2000).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2

. The government does point to the law enforcement officer’s impression that the defendant was being overly polite as a factor supporting a probable cause finding. However, a careful review of the officer’s testimony reveals that the behavior that the officer deemed overly polite occurred only after the officer had detained the defendant by retaining the defendant’s driver's license while running file checks.
Case 16-33351-KRH Doc 56 Filed 03/02/18 Entered 03/02/18 13:33:12 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 11
Case 16-33351-KRH Doc 56 Filed 03/02/18 Entered 03/02/18 13:33:12 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 11
Case 16-33351-KRH Doc 56 Filed 03/02/18 Entered 03/02/18 13:33:12 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 11
Case 16-33351-KRH Doc 56 Filed 03/02/18 Entered 03/02/18 13:33:12 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 11
Case 16-33351-KRH Doc 56 Filed 03/02/18 Entered 03/02/18 13:33:12 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 11
Case 16-33351-KRH Doc 56 Filed 03/02/18 Entered 03/02/18 13:33:12 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 11
Case 16-33351-KRH Doc 56 Filed 03/02/18 Entered 03/02/18 13:33:12 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 11
Case 16-33351-KRH Doc 56 Filed 03/02/18 Entered 03/02/18 13:33:12 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 11
Case 16-33351-KRH Doc 56 Filed 03/02/18 Entered 03/02/18 13:33:12 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 11
Case 16-33351-KRH Doc 56 Filed 03/02/18 Entered 03/02/18 13:33:12 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 11
Case 16-33351-KRH Doc 56 Filed 03/02/18 Entered 03/02/18 13:33:12 Desc Main

 Document Page 11 of 11
FY 2013 Service Contract Inventory

Planned Analysis of FY 2013 Inventory

As required by OMB Memorandum entitled Service Contract Inventories, dated December 19, 2011, SEC 

has selected the following PSCs in its FY 2013 inventory. The SEC selected four PSCs (three (3) are 

among our top 10 PSCs and one (1) is a special interest PSC). None of the selected PSCs were included in 

the review last year. Additionally, these represent approximately 26% of the total obligated dollars for 

FY13. 

PSC Product or service Description Dollars Obligated in 

FY 2013

D399 IT and Telecom – Other IT and 

Telecommunications

$41,722,184.18

D301 IT and Telecom – Facility Operation and 

Maintenance support – Professional: 

Program Management/Support

$25,551,745.56

R710 Support – Management: Financial $13,397,560.14

D310 IT and Telecom – Cyber Security and Data 

Backup

$2,570,292.02
Exhibit 10.2

                                 SCHEDULE 2.1(h)

                               COMMENCEMENT DATES

         Homewood Suites(R) Jackson
         Jackson, Mississippi

         December 22, 1999


<PAGE>






                                SCHEDULE 3.1(a)-8

                                   BASE RENTS

         Homewood Suites(R) Jackson
         Jackson, Mississippi

                                                     $462,750


<PAGE>



                                SCHEDULE 3.1(b)-8

                            SUITE REVENUE BREAKPOINT

         HOMEWOOD SUITES(R) JACKSON
         JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- -----------
 QUARTERS        2000       2001       2002       2003       2004       2005       2006       2007        2008
 --------        ----       ----       ----       ----       ----       ----       ----       ----        ----
<S>            <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>         <C>
1ST QUARTER    $150,394   $155,021   $161,963   $166,590   $171,218   $175,845   $180,473   $185,100    $189,728

2ND QUARTER    $300,788   $310,043   $323,925   $333,180   $342,435   $351,690   $360,945   $370,200    $379,455

3RD QUARTER    $451,181   $465,064   $485,888   $499,770   $513,653   $527,535   $541,418   $555,300    $569,183

4TH QUARTER    $601,575   $620,085   $647,850   $666,360   $684,870   $703,380   $721,890   $740,400    $758,910
------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- -----------
</TABLE>
### §505a. Interchange of lands between Department of Agriculture and military departments of Department of Defense; report to Congress

The Secretary of Agriculture with respect to National Forest System lands and the Secretary of a military department with respect to lands under the control of the military department which lie within or adjacent to the exterior boundaries of a unit of the National Forest System are authorized, subject to any applicable provisions of chapters 1 to 11 of title 40 and division C (except sections 3302, 3307(e), 3501(b), 3509, 3906, 4710, and 4711) of subtitle I of title 41, to interchange such lands, or any part thereof, without reimbursement or transfer of funds whenever they shall determine that such interchange will facilitate land management and will provide maximum use thereof for authorized purposes: Provided, That no such interchange of lands shall become effective until forty-five days (counting only days occurring during any regular or special session of the Congress) after the submission to the Congress by the respective Secretaries of notice of intention to make the interchange.

(July 26, 1956, ch. 736, §1, 70 Stat. 656; Pub. L. 100–409, §7(a), (b), Aug. 20, 1988, 102 Stat. 1091.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

In text, "chapters 1 to 11 of title 40 and division C (except sections 3302, 3307(e), 3501(b), 3509, 3906, 4710, and 4711) of subtitle I of title 41" substituted for "the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, as amended" on authority of Pub. L. 107–217, §5(c), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1303, which Act enacted Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, and Pub. L. 111–350, §6(c), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3854, which Act enacted Title 41, Public Contracts.

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–409 substituted "National Forest System lands" for "national forest lands" and "a unit of the National Forest System" for "a national forest".
### §460rr–1. Map and description

As soon as practicable after October 20, 1986, the Secretary of Agriculture shall file a map and legal description of the national recreation area designated by this subchapter with the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs and the Committee on Agriculture of the United States House of Representatives and with the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the United States Senate. Such map and description shall have the same force and effect as if included in this subchapter, except that correction of clerical and typographical errors in such map and description may be made by the Secretary. Such map and description shall be on file and available for public inspection in the Office of the Chief of the Forest Service, Department of Agriculture.

(Pub. L. 99–504, title II, §202, Oct. 20, 1986, 100 Stat. 1804.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs of the House of Representatives changed to Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives on Jan. 5, 1993, by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Third Congress.
# Official Journal C 380/10 N

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 380 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6010 November 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 380

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6010 November 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 380/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2017/C 380/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  ) | 7 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 380/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2017/C 380/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  )

2

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |
| | (2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

(2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty.

2

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
OFFICE OF THE AfTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Boll. T* @a hbblb 

FlP0t Asesietant 

StAta SllpePlnterKlent 

Almttn, Tesaa 

De8P Sic) 

/4 

‘\ \ 

l-----J\ 
man Sohool Dietriot to the Tkmpson Imlependent School Dietriot. 

*The Board of Trustees of the ConoerCL 

consol&iated, couElozl Gchool Metrfot Ho. D, 

desires that you subdt to the Attorney 

beneral of Texes, the question of the legality OF the aotion on the part of the ,Barriaon and weaver Common Bohool Distriote and 

the Doad of Trustees of ShelbJr County in 

grantSag to timpaen this thirty (30) foot 

strip of lard In order that aa!ld Timpson 

Dlstriat rould oonneot rith the Conoord Mstriot so that said trsnsf'ere ooulU be made.* 

The Harrison and Weaver Wanaoxt Who01 D&&riots 

have no authority 2n law to oonvey to the Timpsen D&i&riot 

the 304oot etrip of iana in- about. The Boara of 

tmoh &a distrlot has only such lowers as we granted to if 

by etatute, ard this peter to aonvey away a part of Its 

territory ie not one of them. 

The rarlaus phases or thi8, oub set have been 

aleborately Biuauusecl an& deoided in a p$d ant3 as fOllo*sr 

190. 0451, x0. o-em, 150. O-940, and lo, o-1710, oopiee 

of uhleh opinion aooompany this reply. 

Your6 very truly 

ATTORNZX OIXUERU OW TfiZ# 

.
### §450cc. Castle Clinton National Monument; establishment

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to accept, on behalf of the United States, title to the site, comprising approximately one acre and situated in Battery Park, New York City, of the historic structure known as Castle Clinton, together with such structure and any other improvement on or appurtenant to such site. When title to such property is vested in the United States, it shall constitute the Castle Clinton National Monument.

(Aug. 12, 1946, ch. 954, §1, 60 Stat. 997.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Preservation and Administration of Castle Clinton National Monument

Study by New York City National Shrines Advisory Board concerning preservation and administration of Castle Clinton National Monument, see act Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 779, §§1, 2, 69 Stat. 632, which is classified as a note under section 102303 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.