alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Kimberly A. Chandler, VSB# 47897

Richard C. Pecoraro, VSB# 48650

CHANDLER PECORARO, PLC

P.O. Box 17586

Richmond, VA 23226

Office: (804) 545-0737

Fax: (480) 393-5764

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

RICHMOND DIVISION

In re: Jeffrey M. Sober, Case No. 15-31693-KLP

Janice M. Sober

Debtors,

Chapter 13

C. I. ASSOCIATES, L.P.,

Plaintiff, Case No. 15-03382-KLP

v. 

JANICE M. SOBER,

Defendant.

NOTICE OF DEBTORS MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MEMORANDUM OF 

LAW IN SUPPORT THEREOF

The above named Debtor(s), by counsel, have filed a Motion to Dismiss and 

Motion for Summary Judgement and Memorandum of Law in Support Thereof with the 

Court. 

Your rights may be affected. You should read these papers carefully and discuss 

them with your attorney, if you have one.

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A HEARING ON THIS MOTION 

WILL BE HELD AT THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT, 701 EAST 

BROAD STREET, ROOM 5100, RICHMOND, VIRGINIA, ON NOVEMBER 4, 

2015, at 11:00 a.m.

If you want to be heard on this matter, then on or before seven (7) days from the 

date of the hearing, you or your attorney must: 

1. File with the court, at the address below, a written response pursuant to 

Local Rule 9013-1(H). If you mail your response to the Court for filing, 

you must mail it early enough so that the Court will receive it on or before 

the date stated above.

Clerk of Court

U.S. Bankruptcy Court

701 East Broad Street, Suite 4000

Richmond, VA 23219

Case 15-03382-KLP Doc 12-1 Filed 10/13/15 Entered 10/13/15 19:30:04 Desc

 Notice of Motion Notice of Motion and hearing Page 1 of 2
Kimberly A. Chandler, VSB# 47897

Richard C. Pecoraro, VSB# 48650

CHANDLER PECORARO, PLC

P.O. Box 17586

Richmond, VA 23226

Office: (804) 545-0737

Fax: (480) 393-5764

2. You must also mail a copy to:

Chandler Pecoraro, PLC

P.O. Box 17586

Richmond, VA 23226

3. Attend the hearing scheduled above.

If you or your attorney do not take these steps, the Court may decide that you do 

not oppose the relief sought in the Motion and may enter an Order granting the requested 

relief.

Respectfully submitted,

Janice M. Sober, By Counsel

CHANDLER PECORARO, PLC

By: /s/Kimberly A. Chandler

Kimberly A. Chandler, VSB# 47897

Richard C. Pecoraro, VSB# 48650

CHANDLER PECORARO, PLC

P.O. Box 17586

Richmond, VA 23226

Office: (804) 545-0737

Fax: (480) 393-5764

Counsel for Debtors

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on October 13, 2015, I have transmitted a true copy of the 

foregoing Notice of Hearing on the Debtors Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary 

Judgment electronically through the Court’s CM/ECF system or by mail if other than by 

the electronic means to the Chapter 13 Trustee and W. R. Baldwin, III, Esq., Meyer 

Baldwin Long & Moore, LLP, 5409 Patterson Ave., Ste. 101, Richmond, VA 23226.

By: /s/ Kimberly A. Chandler

Kimberly A. Chandler, VSB# 47897

Richard C. Pecoraro, VSB# 48650

CHANDLER PECORARO, PLC

Counsel for Debtors

Case 15-03382-KLP Doc 12-1 Filed 10/13/15 Entered 10/13/15 19:30:04 Desc

 Notice of Motion Notice of Motion and hearing Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          15,713
<SECURITIES>                                     4,003
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,887
<ALLOWANCES>                                       500
<INVENTORY>                                      9,350
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,141
<PP&E>                                          83,408
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,165
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 200,824
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,194
<BONDS>                                         14,571
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           409
<OTHER-SE>                                      86,464
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   200,824
<SALES>                                        404,216
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               404,216
<CGS>                                          401,714
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  401,714
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   960
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 394
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,148
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,720
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                572
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          450
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,022
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Nomination of Marriner S. Eccles to Be a Member of the Federal Reserve Board

              																	United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking and Currency, 1913-1970					 and 	Seventy-Fourth Congress, 1935-1937. 						*Nomination of Marriner S. Eccles to Be a Member of the Federal Reserve Board : Hearing Before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Banking and Currency, United States Senate, Seventy-Fourth Congress, First Session, April 15 and 19, 1935*,												Washington: 								Government Printing Office, 										April 15 and 19, 1935,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/785,			accessed on September 22, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-21079 Conference Calendar

DENNIS A. NASH, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus

PAUL F. MILLS, Doctor; NAIK, Doctor; L. ASCHBERGER, Physician Assistant; LE, Doctor; HIRSCH, Lieutenant; JAMES DANE, Doctor, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CV-1437

-------------------- December 11, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Dennis A. Nash appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the above-named defendants as frivolous and for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) & (ii). Although Nash identifies seven points of error, the only issue he briefs is whether the district court abused its discretion in dismissing his deliberate indifference claims. Accordingly, because Nash does not brief his remaining issues, orNo. 00-21079 -2- address his claim of excessive force, those issues are deemed abandoned. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993). We have reviewed the record and briefs submitted by the parties and hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Nash’s deliberate indifference claims. Estelle v. Gamble , 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976); Berry v. Brady , 192 F.3d 504, 507 (5th Cir. 1999); Varnado v. Lynaugh , 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. Nash has filed motions for the appointment of counsel, for an emergency temporary restraing order, and for an injunction pending appeal. All motions are DENIED.
#### In re Lawrence E. GRIFFIN, Petitioner.

No. 02-6179.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 2002.

Decided May 23, 2002.

Lawrence E. Griffin, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Lawrence E. Griffin petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking a coram nobis hearing challenging his 1981 conviction in the District of Columbia court system. This court does not have jurisdiction to review District of Columbia cases or cases in oth*955er federal circuits. *See District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman,*460 U.S. 462, 482, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); *Gurley v. Superior Court of Mecklenburg County,*411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir.1969). Because we do not have jurisdiction to grant the requested relief, we deny the petition. We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
Order entered March 2 7 , 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 17
- 01211
- CV ENNIS HAYWOOD, Appellant

V. JPACK INVESTMENTS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 17
- 04786
- E



### O RDER Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Evans, and Justice Brown This is an appeal from the trial court’s September 28, 2017 judgment for possession in a
forcible detainer suit. Be fore the Court is appellee’s March 8, 2018 opposed motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to require additional security. Appellee argues the appeal should be dismissed because appellant has not complied with the Court’s directive to file a docketing

s tatement and has not filed his initial brief. If the appeal is not dismissed, appellee argues appellant should be required to post additional security. Appellee notes the trial court set the bond to supersede the judgment at $100 by order signed October 9, 2017 but stated the amount

was intended to be merely temporary and would be subject to further hearings. Appellee also notes we stayed the execution of the judgment for possession on October 12, 2017 . Appelleeasserts the trial court has refused to ho ld a hearing to reassess the bond amount because of our

order to stay

. W e DENY appellee’s motion

. T o the extent it seeks dismissal of the appeal , we note the briefing deadlines have not been triggered because the reporter’s record has not been filed. T o the extent the motion seeks appellant be require d to post additional security, we note that our October 12, 2017 order stayed only the efforts to execute on the judgment. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 24.3(a)(2) provides that the trial court retains continuing jurisdiction to modify the amount of security required to continue the suspension of judgment. See T EX
. R.
A PP
. P. 24.3(a)(2). We note appellant notified the Court on March 20, 2018, that he wishes to proceed without the reporter’s record. As the clerk’s record has been filed, we ORDER appellant to file his brief no later than April 2 5 , 2018

. We further ORDER appellant to file a proper docketing statement with this Court no later than April 5 , 2018

. /s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
### US EPA Water Quality Standards Regulatory Changes

- State Consultation Call @ASIWPCA

August 25, 2010

Participant Listing

I n

- person

Dr. Richard Anderson U.S. Conference of Mayors

Max Behlke National Conference of State Legislatures ma x.behlke@ncsl.org

Carolyn Berndt National League of Cities berndt@nlc.org

Steve Brown Environmental Council of the States sbrown@ecos.org

Kathy Bunting Howarth ASIWPCA

Nell Etheridge Council of State Governments

Chris Hornback National Association of Clean Water Agencies CHornback@nacwa.org

Mic helle Nellenbach National Governors Association

J udy Sheahan U.S. Conference of Mayors

Tamra Spielvogel National Conference of State Legislatures tamra.spielvogel@ncsl.org

Sarah Stockdal e National Association of Towns and Townships



### By phone

Julie Ufner National Association of Counties jufner@naco.org

Lee Garrigan Environmental Council of the States lgarrigan@ecos.org

Barbara Biggs NACWA

Jamie Mitchell NACWA
### §460hhh–8. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 103–63, §10, Aug. 4, 1993, 107 Stat. 301.)
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.04

                    AMENDMENT TO THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED
                          INVESTORS RIGHTS AGREEMENT

     This Amendment (the "Amendment") to Third Amended and Restated Investors'
Rights Agreement dated as of June 10, 1999 (the "Agreement"), by and among
Interwoven, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and the persons listed
on Schedule A thereto (the "Investors"), as amended. Capitalized terms used
herein without definition have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreement.

     The Company has filed a Registration Statement on Form S-1 in connection
with an underwritten public offering of 1,000,000 shares of its common stock and
up to 2,450,000 shares of its common stock held by certain of its stockholders.

     As is set forth in Sections 5 of the Agreement, the Investors are entitled
to be given notice of the Company's decision to file the Registration Statement,
and to participate in the offering covered by such Registration Statement to the
extent that Investors have furnished the Company with a written request to
participate within 20 days of receiving such notice.

     Now, therefore, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises
contained herein, pursuant to Section 17.6 of the Agreement, the undersigned
Investor hereby agrees as follows:


     1.   The Agreement shall be amended to include the following Section 5.4:

          "5.4 Limitation on Piggyback Registration. Notwithstanding anything in
               ------------------------------------
     this Section 5 to the contrary, Section 5 of this Agreement shall not apply
     to offer and sale of the Company's securities contemplated by the Company's
     registration statement on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange
     Commission on December 17, 1999."

     2.   Except as specifically amended hereby, the Agreement shall remain in
     full force and effect.

     3.   This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of
     which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall
     constitute one and the same instrument.
<PAGE>

             SIGNATURE PAGE TO INVESTOR RIGHTS AGREEMENT AMENDMENT

In witness whereof, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to Third
Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement.

Dated:  ___________, ______

                              Company:

                                   Interwoven, Inc., a Delaware corporation


                                   By:__________________________

                                   Name:

                                   Title:


                              Investor:

                                   _____________________________________________
                                   Signature

                                   _____________________________________________
                                   Name

                                   _____________________________________________
                                   Title, if signatory is an entity
#### Mae J. Wolfer et al., Appellants, v. National City Bank of New York, Respondent.

No opinion. Present—Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.
§ 661.39 How are project cost overruns funded? ( a ) A request for additional TTFBP funds for cost overruns on a specific bridge project must be submitted to Bureau of Indian Affairs Division of Transportation (BIADOT) and FHWA for approval. The written submission must include a justification, an explanation as to why the overrun occurred, and the amount of additional funding required with supporting cost data. If approved by FHWA and BIADOT, the request will be placed at the top of the appropriate queue (with a contract modification request having a higher priority than a request for additional funds for a project award) and funding may be provided if available.
( b ) Project cost overruns may also be funded out of the Tribe's regular TTP construction funding.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MARCUS T. HOSTZCLAW,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-1472

[July 26, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Jeffrey J. Colbath, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 502011CF003931A.

Marcus T. Hostzclaw, Sanderson, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
موظفو التصنيع

األمور التي يمكنك القيامبهاداخل العمل وخارجه لحماية نفسك وزمالئك في العمل من مرضكوفيد19-

C316954- CS 07/08/2020

الزمالمنزل عندما تشعر بوعكة. 

األعراض الواجب مراقبتها:

	 السعال

	 ضيق التنفس أو صعوبة التنفس

	 الحمى

	 القشعريرة

	 أمل بالعضالت

	 التهاب الحلق

	 فقدان حاسة التذوق أو الشم حديثًا

تجنب التواصل مع اآلخرين أثناء إصابتك باملرض

	 َ ابق، قدر املستطاع، يف غرفة منفصلة يف املنزل ً بعيدا عن األشخاص اآلخرين

	 استرش الطبيب املتابع لحالتك أو املرشف عليك بخصوص موعد إمكانية عودتك إىل العمل

النسخة المتاحة: html.employers-workers-manufacturing-guidance/community/ncov/2019-coronavirus/gov.cdc.www://https

coronavirus/gov.cdc

ُعد 6 أقدام )حوايل ذراعني( عىل األقل من األشخاص اآلخرين يف مكان عملك ومجتمعك

َ ابق، قدر املستطاع، عىل ب

ُعد 6 أقدام عىل األقل أثناء املحادثات أو يف غرف تغيري املالبس أو املمرات أو الردهات وعند دخول مكان العمل أو مغادرته

	 ابق عىل ب

	 تجنب مشاركة الطعام والرشاب مع الزمالء

	 يجب تنظيف األدوات وتطهريها بانتظام، ً خصوصا عند تغيري محطات العمل أو استخدام مجموعة جديدة من األدوات

	 تجنب التجمع يف السيارة، إن أمكن

ِ ارتد غطاء وجه من القامش لتغطية الفم والوجه أثناء تواجدك يف مكان العمل واألماكن العامة

َ 	 ي الوجه بشكل محكم ومريح

ِ ارتد الغطاء لتطويق جانب

	 عند خلع غطاء الوجه، احرص عىل عدم مالمسة العني أو األنف أو الفم، اغسل يديك عىل الفور

	 اغسل غطاء الوجه أو استبدله بعد االستخدام

	 استبدل غطاء الوجه عندما يصبح مبلالً أو ً متسخا

	 استمر يف ارتداء معدات الوقاية الشخصية )PPE )املطلوبة يف مهام العمل العادية

أقدام 6

(مترین)
coronavirus/gov.cdc

ال تلمس العني أو األنف أو الفم

	 بأيدي غري نظيفة

	 أثناء ارتداء القفازات

	 أثناء تعديل غطاء الوجه أو النظارة الواقية أو خلعهام

ًا لأليدي بنسبة تركيز كحويل ال تقل عن :%60

اغسل يديك باملاء والصابون ملدة 20 ثانية عىل األقل، أو استخدم ً مطهرا كحولي

	 قبل مناوبات العمل واالسرتاحات وبعدها

	 بعد متخيط )تنظيف( األنف أو السعال أو العطس

	 بعد استعامل املرحاض

	 قبل األكل

	 قبل وخالل وبعد تحضري الطعام

	 بعد ارتداء أو مالمسة أو خلع أغطية الوجه القامشية.

ِّغط فمك عند السعال والعطس

	 احرص عىل تغطية فمك وأنفك مبنديل أو استخدم الجزء الداخيل من مرفقك إذا مل تكن معك مناديل

	 تخلص من املناديل املستعملة يف صندوق القاممة

	 اغسل يديك عىل الفور أو استخدم مطهر يدين كحويل بنسبة ال تقل عن % 60 بعد العطس أو السعال
Case 17-03846-KRH Doc 19 Filed 09/28/21 Entered 09/28/21 11:58:48 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Case 17-03846-KRH Doc 19 Filed 09/28/21 Entered 09/28/21 11:58:48 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 By:
    
    /s/ Bert B. YoungBert B. YoungChief Financial OfficerDate:
    
    September 17, 2007
§ 511.309 Provisions for traffic and travel conditions reporting. ( a ) Minimum requirements for traffic and travel conditions made available by real-time information programs are: ( 1 ) *Construction activities.* The timeliness for the availability of information about full construction activities that close or reopen roadways or lanes will be 20 minutes or less from the time of the closure for highways outside of Metropolitan Areas. For roadways within Metropolitan Areas, the timeliness for the availability of information about full construction activities that close or reopen roadways or lanes will be 10 minutes or less from the time of the closure or reopening. Short-term or intermittent lane closures of limited duration that are less than the required reporting times are not included as a minimum requirement under this section.
( 2 ) *Roadway or lane blocking incidents.* The timeliness for the availability of information related to roadway or lane blocking traffic incidents will be 20 minutes or less from the time that the incident is verified for highways outside of Metropolitan Areas. For roadways within Metropolitan Areas, the timeliness for the availability of information related to roadway or lane blocking traffic incidents will be 10 minutes or less from the time that the incident is verified.
( 3 ) *Roadway weather observations.* The timeliness for the availability of information about hazardous driving conditions and roadway or lane closures or blockages because of adverse weather conditions will be 20 minutes or less from the time the hazardous conditions, blockage, or closure is observed.
( 4 ) *Travel time information.* The timeliness for the availability of travel time information along limited access roadway segments within Metropolitan Areas, as defined under this subpart, will be 10 minutes or less from the time that the travel time calculation is completed.
( 5 ) *Information accuracy.* The designed accuracy for a real-time information program shall be 85 percent accurate at a minimum, or have a maximum error rate of 15 percent.
( 6 ) *Information availability.* The designed availability for a real-time information program shall be 90 percent available at a minimum.
( b ) Real-time information programs may be established using legacy monitoring mechanisms applied to the highways, using a statewide incident reporting system, using new monitoring mechanisms applied to the highways, using value-added information products, or using a combination of monitoring mechanisms and value-added information products.