### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 1

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

APPLIANCE STANDARDS AND RULEMAKING FEDERAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING

CAUSE NO. Jun 0413-2 EE-2J

Wednesday, July 17, 2013 10:03 a.m.

Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue SW Forrestal Building Suite 8E-089 Washington, D.C. 20585

Reported by: Janel Benoit Folsom, Capital Reporting Company

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 2 1 A P P E A R A N C E S 2 PARTICIPANTS 3 Neil Eisner, Facilitator 4 John Cymbalsky, U.S. Department of Energy 5 Ashley Armstrong, U.S. Department of Energy 6 Laura Barhydt, U.S. Department of Energy 7 Phillip Stephens, HTP, Inc. 8 Russell "Rusty" Tharp, Goodman Manufacturing 9 Karen Meyers, Rheem Manufacturing 10 Karim Amrane, Air Conditioning, Hearing, and Refrigeration Institute 11 Timothy Ballo, Earthjustice 12 Jeff Bauman, National Refrigeration and Air 13 Conditioning 14 Robert Whitwell, Carrier 15 Frank Stanonick, Air Conditioning, Hearing, and Refrigeration Institute 16 Marshall Hunt, Pacific Gas and Electric 17 Charles Hon, True Manufacturing 18 Michael Kojack, Underwriters Laboratory, LLC 19 Judd Smith, CSA International 20 Jill Hootman, Trane 21 Mary Dane, Traulsen 22 John Clements, Mitsubishi Electric US, Inc.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 3 1 A P P E A R A N C E S (Continued) 2 PARTICIPANTS (Continued) 3 Mark W. Fly, AAON 4 Harvey Sachs, American Counsel for an Energy Efficient Economy 5 Dave Winningham, Allied Air Enterprises 6 Mike Rivest, Navigant 7 Laura Degitz, Navigant 8 Collin Weber, Navigant 9 Massoud Neshan, Southern Store Fixtures 10 Kevin Washington, ITW 11 Tom Johnson, Daikin McQuay 12 Frank Myers, PVI Industries 13 Jeff Kleiss, Lochinvar 14 Alex Bosenberg, NEMA 15 Ron Shebik, Hussmann Corporation 16 Mike Stem, Intertek 17 Diane Jakobs, Rheem 18 Aris Marantan, PhD 19 John Hurst, Lennox International 20 Steve Rosenstock, Edison Electric Institute 21 John Mandyck, Carrier 22 Charles Hon, True Manufacturing

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 4 1 P R O C E E D I N G S 2 MR. EISNER: So there was an interim 3 meeting, and I thought Laura might want to bring us up 4 to date where we are, what happened in that meeting, 5 and where we are now. 6 MS. BARHYDT: So we had a meeting last 7 Wednesday with manufacturers of computer room air 8 conditioners and SPVUs, and we got a lot of helpful 9 information, and I think we have slides put together 10 to go through that material. 11 I think -- if it works for everyone, I think 12 we have resolved most of the issues on basic model 13 from the last meeting, and we were going to be ready 14 to take a vote this week. So if it is agreeable to 15 everyone, I would suggest -- we've been staring at 16 these same slides for quite some time. Maybe we can 17 just actually start going through them and start 18 voting on things. And then when we get to the 19 unresolved issues, we'll handle those as we go through 20 the slides. That way we're not jumping back and forth 21 around in the slides. 22 MR. EISNER: Any concerns or objections or

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 5 1 questions? Maybe what we should do is get an informal 2 okay on each slide, go to the next one, and then at 3 the end, if everybody's okay with everything, I want 4 to go back and look at a particular slide. 5 MR. THARP: Rusty Tharp with Goodman. I 6 agree with that general position. I think there were 7 some water source heat pump accessories that we did 8 not go through last time, and also I would like to 9 consider some potential VRF (ph) accessories also. 10 MS. ARMSTRONG: Some additional what? 11 MS. BARHYDT: Is it okay if we deal with 12 that as we go through the slides? 13 MR. THARP: I'm fine with that. 14 MS. BARHYDT: Okay. 15 MS. ARMSTRONG: Or at the end, because 16 they're not in the slides? 17 MR. EISNER: Okay. Who wants to walk us 18 through the slides? 19 MS. ARMSTRONG: I can. Hang on one -- are 20 you -- let me get them in order. 21 MS. BARHYDT: Okay. 22 MR. FREEMAN: Do you want me to navigate?

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 6 1 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah, sure. We can do that 2 that way. 3 MR. EISNER: Do the introductions first. 4 Okay. When you're talking, don't forget put your mic 5 on, say your name. We have another new reporter here 6 today. 7 MS. ARMSTRONG: Do you want us to do them at 8 the outset, too, everyone's name and affiliation? 9 MS. BARHYDT: Sure. 10 MS. ARMSTRONG: Okay. Should we just go 11 around the room? 12 MR. EISNER: Okay. 13 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah. 14 MR. EISNER: I'm Neil Eiser, facilitator. 15 MS. DANE: Mary Dane from Traulsen. 16 MR. SACHS: Harvey Sachs, ACEEE. 17 MR. HUNT: Marshall Hunt, Pacific Gas and 18 Electric Company. 19 MR. WHITWELL: Bob Whitwell, Carrier. 20 MR. BAUMAN: Jeff Bauman, National 21 Refrigeration and Air Conditioning. 22 MR. CLEMENTS: John Clements, Mitsubishi

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 7 1 Electric. 2 MR. AMRANE: Karim Amrane, AHRI. 3 MS. MEYERS: Karen Meyers, Rheem 4 Manufacturing. 5 MR. KOJACK: Mike Kojack, UL. 6 MR. HURST: John Hurst, Lennox 7 International. 8 MR. THARP: Rusty Tharp with Goodman. 9 MR. STEPHENS: Phillip Stephens, HTP. 10 MS. HOOTMAN: Jill Hootman, Trane. 11 MS. BARHYDT: Laura Barhydt, DOE. 12 MS. ARMSTRONG: Ashley Armstrong, DOE. 13 MR. CYMBALSKY: John Cymbalsky, DOE. 14 MR. RIVEST: Mike Rivest, Navigant. 15 MS. DEGITZ: Laura Degitz, Navigant. 16 MS. TUCKER: Corey Tucker, Navigant. 17 MR. WEBER: Collin Weber, Navigant. 18 MR. EISNER: We go around in the back? 19 MR. JOHNSON: Tom Johnson, Daikin McQuay. 20 MR. FLY: Mark Fly, AAON. 21 MS. JAKOBS: Diane Jakobs, Rheem 22 Manufacturing.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 8 1 MR. NESHAN: Massoud Neshan, Southern Store 2 Fixtures. 3 MR. MYERS: Frank Myers, PVI Industries. 4 MR. WINNINGHAM: Dave Winningham, Allied 5 Air. 6 MS. BARHYDT: Can you all step down to the 7 microphone? Thank you. 8 MR. ROSENSTOCK: Steve Rosenstock, Edison 9 Electric Institute. 10 MR. BOSENBERG: Alex Bosenberg, National 11 Electrical Manufacturers Association. 12 MR. WASHINGTON: Kevin Washington with ITW 13 D.C. office, parent of Traulsen. 14 MR. STEM: Mike Stem with Intertek. 15 MR. EISNER: Okay. 16 MS. ARMSTRONG: Wow. 17 MR. EISNER: Oh, one more. 18 MALE SPEAKER: Yeah. Jeff (inaudible) 19 Group. 20 MS. BARHYDT: Okay. So the basic model 21 definition that we have for commercial warm air 22 furnaces, a basic model means all commercial warm air

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 9 1 furnaces manufactured by one manufacturer that have 2 the same nominal input ratings and have the same 3 primary energy source, e.g., gas or oil, and that do 4 not have any different physical or functional 5 characteristics that affect energy efficiency. 6 MR. WHITWELL: Bob Whitwell, Carrier. Just 7 one minor thing. We could take the plural off of 8 ratings because there's only one input rating. "Same 9 nominal input rating." 10 MR. EISNER: All right. Any questions, 11 comments? Everybody okay with this for now? All 12 right. 13 MS. ARMSTRONG: Okay. Should we vote on it? 14 MR. EISNER: Well, we'll just get an 15 informal okay, I think, now, and then just vote on the 16 whole thing at the end, see if anybody wants go ahead. 17 MS. ARMSTRONG: I would vote as we go 18 because I'm pretty sure there's going to be ones that 19 MS. MEYERS: So this is Karen Meyers with 20 Rheem. So as we've gone through this process, we 21 have, you know, noted exceptions that will not be 22 included when a unit is tested or anything like that.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 10 1 So the clause "different physical or functional 2 characteristics," you know, we've noted things that 3 could affect that, but would not be included as a 4 basic model that is tested. How is that clarified in 5 this definition? 6 MS. ARMSTRONG: There are no exceptions -- 7 MS. BARHYDT: So the definition -- 8 MS. MEYERS: We're on warm air furnaces. 9 Excuse me (inaudible). 10 MS. BARHYDT: Okay. 11 MR. EISNER: We had a really good answer for 12 this. 13 MS. MEYERS: Sorry. 14 MS. ARMSTRONG: I put the easy ones first, I 15 thought. 16 MS. MEYERS: That's all right. 17 MR. EISNER: Any concerns with voting now on 18 each slide? Okay. Anybody object? Everybody agrees? 19 Let's go to the next slide. 20 MS. BARHYDT: Basic model definition, 21 commercial package boilers. The basic model means all 22 commercial package boilers of a given type

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 11 1 manufactured by one manufacturer having the same 2 primary energy source, e.g., gas or oil, and that have 3 essentially identical electrical, physical, and 4 functional characteristics that affect energy 5 efficiency. 6 MR. EISNER: Questions? Comments? Does 7 anybody object? Does anybody abstain? Should have 8 asked that. Did anybody abstain on the first one? 9 MR. SACHS: Harvey Sachs, ACEEE. The 10 definition allows the same basic -- a basic model to 11 include a number of different input rates. 12 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yes. 13 MR. SACHS: Just -- I think I'm okay with 14 that, but I just want to make sure that this is 15 starting to move toward product family-type 16 definition. 17 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yes. It's at the -- from 18 the Department's position, it is at the discretion of 19 the manufacturer to do them. 20 MR. SACHS: Thank you, Ashley. 21 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yep. 22 MR. EISNER: Any objections? Any

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 12 1 abstentions? Okay. Let's go to the next slide. 2 MR. MANDYCK: This is John Mandyck. Can you 3 hear me? 4 MR. EISNER: Yes. 5 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah. 6 MR. MANDYCK: The webinar's not -- you guys 7 haven't loaded. 8 MR. EISNER: We're looking for a response. 9 MS. ARMSTRONG: It's working on our computer 10 here. We can see it when both logged in and logged in 11 on a different computer. 12 MR. SHEBIK: This is Ron Shebik. I can see 13 it. 14 MR. MANDYCK: All right. I'll just reload 15 it. Sorry. 16 MR. EISNER: Okay. Next slide? 17 MR. STEPHENS: Jeff just walked in. He's a 18 boiler guy. 19 MS. ARMSTRONG: Jeff, we just voted for you. 20 MR. STEPHENS: We haven't changed the basic 21 model definition, have we? 22 MS. ARMSTRONG: We did not.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 13 1 MR. STEPHENS: Okay. That's good. 2 MS. ARMSTRONG: Do you want to go back and 3 recite it? 4 MALE SPEAKER: I did your proxy, Jeff. 5 MR. EISNER: Okay. Next slide? 6 MS. BARHYDT: Ready? Basic model 7 definition, commercial water heaters. A basic model 8 means all water heaters of a given type manufactured 9 by one manufacturer having the same primary energy 10 source, e.g., gas or oil, that have essentially 11 identical electrical, physical, and functional 12 characteristics that affect energy efficiency. 13 MR. EISNER: Any questions, comments? 14 MR. SACHS: This is Harvey Sachs again. 15 Just some clarification. This is certainly parallel 16 to the prior ones, but physical characteristics that 17 affect energy efficiency would include capacity by 18 affecting the surface area and, consequently, the heat 19 loss. 20 So this is one issue that implicitly seems 21 to me to allow different burners in the same size can, 22 but not to allow different size cans within the same

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 14 1 basic model. Am I understanding that correctly? 2 MS. ARMSTRONG: It doesn't explicitly 3 disallow it. 4 MR. SACHS: I couldn't hear you, Ashley. 5 MS. ARMSTRONG: This is Ashley from DOE. It 6 doesn't explicitly disallow it, so if you wanted to 7 put that have -- be identical in nominal capacity or 8 something along that lines, we could add it. It 9 doesn't state that they have to be same capacity, 10 whether that be volume or input rate or whatever. 11 MR. SACHS: Well, the volume is the -- 12 Harvey Sachs again. The volume is the parameter that 13

-- 14 MS. ARMSTRONG: I know. 15 MR. SACHS: -- I resonated on, and my only 16 concern is is that ambiguous enough that it may lead 17 to differences of opinion between the Department and 18 some manufacturers at some point down the road? 19 MS. ARMSTRONG: Well, you could say that 20 they have to have the same rated volume. 21 MR. SACHS: Well, I guess I'm asking the 22 manufacturers if that would be helpful or harmful,

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 15 1 just in terms of people trying to loophole. 2 MR. STEPHENS: Phillip Stephens, HTP. I'm 3 good with this definition. I like that it gives 4 manufacturers much more flexibility. We could easily 5 have a smaller heat exchanger in a smaller tank and a 6 larger heat exchanger in a larger tank. That would 7 have the same efficiency, the same benefit. 8 MR. KLEISS: Jeff Kleiss, Lochinvar. For 9 any unit that has a volume greater than ten gallons 10 and requires standby heat loss, I don't -- I think 11 it's intuitive that they would have a different energy 12 calculation and not qualify as a basic model, as 13 there's a difference in the storage volume. 14 MR. SACHS: This is Harvey again. I think, 15 Phillip, that your comment about two different heat 16 exchangers, apart from -- I can see different heat 17 exchangers from the same heat exchange per unit area, 18 but they would have different physical characteristics 19 just in terms of having different size. 20 So, again, I'm asking you if we don't have 21 an ambiguity that requires some clarification so that 22 we don't have different interpretations that might

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 16 1 look like loopholes. 2 MR. STEPHENS: Well, Jeff's comment was 3 right on the money that when you look at standby loss, 4 it prevents those loopholes from happening. 5 MR. SACHS: So this is Harvey again. You 6 all, as manufacturers and DOE, are comfortable that 7 this is going to give us a level playing field? 8 MR. STEPHENS: Yes. 9 MS. MEYERS: Jeff, will you repeat what you 10 said? 11 MR. KLEISS: Yes. The features that we have 12 to report on commercial water heaters are -- I'm 13 sorry. I'm understating. Jeff Kleiss, Lochinvar -- 14 that the -- when you're over ten gallons of storage 15 volume, then you have to report standby heat loss as 16 well as thermal efficiency. So if you're -- you could 17 have consistent thermal efficiency, but any time you 18 would have a change in volume and you're over ten 19 gallons, you would have to determine your standby heat 20 loss, and that will change with any change in volume. 21 MS. ARMSTRONG: I think another way -- this 22 is Ashley. Another way to say it is, Harvey, it

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 17 1 pretty much does require each basic model to have a 2 singular rated storage volume. It doesn't explicitly 3 say that, though. So to the extent -- I mean, that is 4 what you're describing. That is what you're going to 5 do. To the extent we want to make that explicit, we 6 could just say with, you know -- 7 MR. KLEISS: Jeff Kleiss, Lochinvar. As 8 long as we maintain the stipulation of greater than 9 ten gallons of storage volume, then I would be okay in 10 adding volume as a limitation or similarity on that 11 definition. 12 MR. SACHS: Ashley -- this is Harvey. I 13 would like to see that clarification. I'm just 14 worried about some half-baked lawyer for some new 15 entrant firm saying, "Ah, we can do everything in one 16 basic model." I recognize that not everybody has half17 baked lawyers. 18 MR. STEPHENS: Phillip Stephens, HTP. I 19 would prefer that it stay the way it is because this 20 is -- this would be easier to adopt new technologies 21 to. 22 MR. SACHS: You hit my sensitive spot.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 18 1 MR. MYERS: This is Frank Myers, PVI 2 Industries. I, too, feel it should stay as it is. 3 There are two areas, below 10 gallons and those over 4 140 gallons. When you get over 140 gallons -- we make 5 water heaters up to 5,000 gallons -- there's variation 6 according to what option's selected. This gives us a 7 little bit of flexibility to cover that. 8 In all the years that we've been doing this, 9 we haven't seen a hole (ph) that this this would let 10 through, so 11 MR. SACHS: This is Harvey. I give up. 12 MR. EISNER: Okay. Are there any other 13 comments? Any objections? Any abstentions? Okay. 14 Let's go on to the next slide. 15 MS. BARHYDT: Basic model definition, CRE. 16 A basic model means all units of commercial 17 refrigeration equipment manufactured by one 18 manufacturer having the same primary energy source and 19 that have essentially identical electrical, physical, 20 and functional characteristics that affect energy 21 consumption. And if you can delete the next sentence. 22 There you go.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 19 1 MR. EISNER: Comments? Any objections? 2 MR. SHEBIK: This is Ron Shebik from 3 Hussmann. 4 MR. EISNER: We're having a little trouble 5 hearing you. Can you speak up? 6 MR. SHEBIK: Sorry. This is Ron from 7 Hussmann. Can you hear me better? 8 MR. EISNER: Yes. 9 MR. SHEBIK: Okay. We -- going back to the 10 definition of basic model for CRE, there were some 11 topics that we were looking at as exclusions from the 12 basic model. Do we want to cover those here, or are 13 those going to be covered in a separate item? 14 MS. BARHYDT: So, Ron, what we're doing is 15 we're doing the basic model definition, and that's the 16 broad definition of how the manufacturers can group 17 models, and then how we're treating all of those 18 individual issues is in the separate slides following 19 this. 20 MR. SHEBIK: Okay. Well, if Charlie, Jeff, 21 and Mary have no objections, then I don't either, 22 then.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 20 1 MR. EISNER: No objections, no abstentions? 2 Okay. Ready for the next slide. 3 MS. BARHYDT: Okay. So was that all -- I 4 guess they're somewhat mixed up because we inserted 5 these as we went along, so 6 MALE SPEAKER: You want the next one, or 7 FEMALE SPEAKER: No, these are the ones that 8 we're still 9 MALE SPEAKER: Yeah, this is the CRE -- 10 MS. BARHYDT: So let's actually jump ahead 11 and do all of the basic model definitions. What slide 12 number is this? 13 MALE SPEAKER: Six. 14 15 MS. BARHYDT: Okay. So we'll come back. Do 16 you want to go ahead and do this now? 17 MR. EISNER: Yeah, let's -- 18 MS. BARHYDT: Okay. So the CRE features 19 were customer display signs and lights. Some 20 customers may wish to add additional exterior signage 21 outside of the body of the refrigerated cabinet to 22 units for advertising purposes.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 21 1 DOE is suggesting that we will issue 2 guidance to indicate that only the energy consumption 3 of the lighting used to illuminate the merchandise -- 4 that is, the product that is being displayed -- should 5 be included in the test procedure energy use 6 calculation. 7 MR. EISNER: Do you want to go over each one 8 of these one at a time? 9 MALE SPEAKER: Yes. 10 MR. EISNER: Okay. Comments, questions? 11 MR. HON: This is Charlie Hon. This is a 12 difficult one because you're giving us a lot of leeway 13 here, but it's in direct conflict with Canada and the 14 Energy Star group. 15 MS. ARMSTRONG: Not in direct conflict with 16

-- 17 MR. HON: They all require that external 18 lighting which is permanently affixed to the unit, 19 especially like the sign display over the top of the 20 door, to be included. 21 MS. ARMSTRONG: So the -- I will clarify one 22 position. The latest draft that just went out of the

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 22 1 Energy Star completely harmonizes the test procedure 2 with the DOE test procedure. So any changes we were 3 to make here would carry over to Energy Star. 4 MR. HON: But what about Canada? 5 MS. ARMSTRONG: That's a valid -- 6 MR. HON: Ashley, did you hear me -- 7 MS. ARMSTRONG: That's a valid point. I 8 can't -- that's out of my control. 9 MR. HON: Then we're adding additional 10 testing into our processes. 11 MS. ARMSTRONG: Well, I mean, technically, 12 if you add in additional energy consumption for the 13 lights, it's going to give you a more conservative 14 rating, and you're free to rate conservatively under 15 the DOE scheme. 16 MR. HON: But unfortunately, with Energy 17 Star involvement, you have a difference there, because 18 Energy Star numbers are quite often compared apples to 19 apples, theoretically, but not apples to oranges, 20 which this could easily make it into if we can rate it 21 conservatively because of the sign panels having 22 traditionally been an integral part of the unit now

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 23 1 being excluded. 2 That means that all the testings we've had 3 done previously suddenly become very conservative, and 4 we will have a tremendous push from our marketing 5 groups, to say the least, to run new calculations for 6 Energy Star and for DOE to make them look better, and 7 all the conversations and all the NOPR work has been 8 done with at least one sign panel included. 9 Will Collin verify that one for me, please? 10 MR. BAUMAN: This is Jeff Bauman from 11 National. I'm just going to -- they're having a bit 12 of a -- DOE's having a bit of a side conversation, 13 Charlie. They're not ignoring you. 14 MS. ARMSTRONG: I heard -- 15 MR. BAUMAN: I'm also kind of surprised 16 because the amount of lighted headers that -- again, I 17 -- you know, it sounds a little odd that industry's 18 saying, "Hey, you guys aren't regulating us enough." 19 But the amount of lighted sign headers that are out 20 there -- and, again, that's been historically what 21 these units have been tested on, and I would -- as 22 Charlie said, I would assume that's kind of how the

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 24 1 standards were looked at, but you can speak to that 2 better, that I would think lighted sign headers that 3 are part of the basic model would be much better to be 4 included than not. 5 MS. ARMSTRONG: The Department's happy to 6 agree with your position here if that's where you want 7 to go. 8 MR. BAUMAN: I mean, maybe it's a matter -- 9 and where we've struggled with, I think, on our side 10 is when it goes to additional lighting and displays 11 and all the other stuff. I mean, maybe it's 12 potentially simple -- and Charlie could speak to this 13 better, is that it's a matter of saying lighting that 14 illuminates the product or any sign headers over the - 15 - you know, how you display that, but lighted headers 16 would be included in that. 17 MS. ARMSTRONG: So the way I read this is 18 that the position for a vote is that the Department 19 needs to go through some type of process, whether it's 20 a guidance process or whether it's a proposed rule, to 21 figure out what's in and what's out. 22 In other words, we're committing here to

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 25 1 saying we believe that those lightings that are 2 intended for use for the displaying the product -- 3 now, whether that's everything that's integral to the 4 cabinet or not or parts and how you draw that line, we 5 don't know. That will need to be figured out. 6 What we're saying, we're willing to go 7 through this process. We're committing to going 8 through that process by putting this out for a vote. 9 MR. BAUMAN: I'm okay with that. 10 MR. HON: This is Charlie Hon. I'm okay 11 with that because we just need to clarify and be 12 consistent. That -- 13 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah, I mean, I think that 14 it's going to be way too hard here in this forum to go 15 through all the details that need to be -- that we 16 would need to hash out in order to come with a 17 position of this is exactly how you test, this is how 18 you turn on, and we have to go through a separate 19 process anyway. But it will be a process that's 20 subject to notice and comment, either -- whether it's 21 a guidance process or not, and, you know, we would 22 encourage you guys to work with us.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 26 1 MR. BAUMAN: Okay. 2 MR. HON: Okay. I -- go ahead. 3 MR. BAUMAN: This is Jeff Bauman from 4 National. I just -- I guess, then, are we -- are you 5 going to modify the wording there to indicate that 6 only energy consumption of lighting to illuminate the 7 merchandise or some kind of wording there to add in 8 that DOE is continuing to look at other lighting? 9 Because, again, I have the similar concern -- I know 10 we can relate -- 11 MS. ARMSTRONG: Sure. 12 MR. BAUMAN: -- conservatively, but I think 13 you're going to get a lot of inconsistencies where 14 customers are going to look at it and think that one 15 unit uses more energy than another, but that may be 16 because they rated conservatively and used their 17 existing testing -- 18 MS. ARMSTRONG: Right. 19 MR. BAUMAN: -- to include the lighting. 20 MS. ARMSTRONG: So how about we just say, 21 "DOE will initiate a process" -- I'm not sure if it'll 22 be a guidance process or a test procedure or

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 27 1 rulemaking process -- "to address how customer display 2 signage and lighting is accounted for in the test 3 procedure." Are we okay with that? 4 MR. BAUMAN: I'm fine with that. 5 MS. ARMSTRONG: Okay. 6 MR. HON: This is Charlie Hon. 7 MALE SPEAKER: What was the last part of 8 that? 9 MR. HON: I'm fine with that as well because 10 we had plenty of things that we were concerned about 11 too much included. All of a sudden, we went back 12 here, and I was suddenly looking at 150 extra tests I 13 needed to run. 14 MS. ARMSTRONG: Sure. And then I'm hoping - 15

- 16 MR. HON: And that's nothing -- 17 MS. ARMSTRONG: -- that you guys will work 18 with us to come up with that position. 19 MR. HON: Oh, you know we will. 20 MS. ARMSTRONG: Thank you. 21 MR. HON: Thank you. 22 MR. SHEBIK: This is Ron Shebik from

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 28 1 Hussmann. One question on this because your initial 2 position for vote, I felt, would probably be a fine 3 position for supermarket (inaudible) cases because we 4 don't have -- we don't deal with the additional 5 signage. I mean, there's very -- there would be very 6 little, if none -- no opportunity for additional 7 signage like that. 8 Now, to what Jeff and Charlie were speaking 9 of, is there a way we can -- in order to dive deeper, 10 if it's necessary, can we separate the supermarket 11 cases from the (inaudible) siders? 12 MS. ARMSTRONG: This is Ashley from DOE. If 13 I understand what you just explained correctly, if 14 there's -- if it's a non-issue, then this wouldn't 15 even be applicable. I mean, the test procedure 16 already accounts for it. The test procedure already 17 explicitly required the product illumination be 18 included, so to the extent there's -- I'm sorry? 19 MR. SHEBIK: That's correct, yeah. 20 MS. ARMSTRONG: So I don't think there's a 21 need for clarification here or separation. 22 MR. SHEBIK: Okay. All right. Thank you.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 29 1 MR. EISNER: Everybody agree with the change 2 in the first bullet? Okay. Anybody object? Anybody 3 abstain? 4 All right. We have agreement on the first 5 one. Second one? 6 MS. BARHYDT: Condensate pan heaters. These 7 are electric resistance heaters used in some equipment 8 types to evaporate defrost melt water. 9 MS. ARMSTRONG: Can I put this in, or do you 10 want to put it in? We're going to need another slide. 11 MS. BARHYDT: Are you adding more stuff, 12 Ashley? 13 MS. ARMSTRONG: Jeff has a proposal. 14 MR. EISNER: With respect -- 15 MR. BAUMAN: We've had some -- this is 16 Jeff Bauman from National again. We've had some 17 discussions as far as trying to help the process here 18 go along. We've had some discussions, Mary and 19 Charlie, myself, and Karim, about ways to try to come 20 with something that we could present that would 21 hopefully get us an answer on the pan heaters. So 22 we've got a proposal that

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 30 1 MS. BARHYDT: Can you describe your 2 proposal? 3 MR. BAUMAN: Except for the fact that I just 4 handed it over and unfortunately, my computer's not 5 working right. Basically, that the pan heater should 6 start dry at the beginning of the entire test, with 7 the -- I mean, looking at ASHRAE 72, the entire test 8 includes, I'll say, several stages, basically a stage 9 where you are bringing it to stabilization; has to 10 remain in stabilized state for 24 hours; and then you 11 begin your actual data recording. 12 The proposal is at the beginning, the 13 initial start of the stabilization period prior to 14 that, the pan starts dry. At that point, it goes 15 through. It's going to be sucking water or whatever 16 condensate is going to be generated. That accumulates 17 in the pan. 18 When you start testing the pan, maybe it's 19 got special open units, pan may be full, but that'll 20 be a factor of what the unit's doing during your 21 stabilization in -- when you're achieving 22 stabilization going, you know, 24 hours. And you're

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 31 1 going to run, you know, typically at least 48 hours by 2 the time that the unit has started going. 3 So rather than trying to add in something 4 that says, "Add a certain amount of water," this gives 5 it -- you know, standardized way to do it. There's, 6 you know, no questions for interpretation, things like 7 that. I just see a lot of concerns about -- you know, 8 I see more chances for a lab be confused by "what's 9 full mean." You know, "Oh, you filled the pan too 10 much," and things like that, versus saying "start dry 11 and let it accumulate." And, again, I believe that 12 simulates, you know, actual conditions and use more 13 accurately. 14 MR. SACHS: This is Harvey, and I'm cool 15 with that, but I do have one question. Not having 16 studied 72-2005, I assume it's mandating a specified 17 relative humidity in the test chamber. 18 MR. BAUMAN: Yes. Dry bulb and wet bulb 19 temperature, which will be the committed air specified 20 as part of the procedure. 21 MR. SACHS: In that case, it sounds like 22 it's simulating reality.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 32 1 MR. HON: This is Charlie Hon. The only 2 thing that would be in question is if it was a very, 3 very large pan where it took more than 48 hours to get 4 it up to where it would be operational. That's the 5 only thing that could be different about it. 6 MR. SACHS: This is Harvey again. Charlie, 7 am I to infer that manufacturers offer different sizes 8 of condensate pans in expectation of different 9 environments, or is this just one of these things 10 that's done to spec or 11 How does that look if you're a customer trying to 12 order a unit? Are you -- does your option list 13 include different condensate pan sizes or 14 MR. HON: Most units get a single pan design 15 for that -- fit in the space, and that's all you get. 16 There are occasions when we do adverse environment17 type pans where the pan is bigger than the standard 18 pan. Those are usually used with wicking kits, which 19 will allow increased evaporation because of that. 20 They're traditionally not used with heated drain pans 21 or pumps, but they do exist. 22 MR. SACHS: So I'm hearing something that's

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 33 1 down in the noise (ph) of the less than 1 percent? 2 MR. HON: Way less than 1 percent. 3 MR. SACHS: That sure helps focus my 4 thoughts. Thank you. 5 MR. EISNER: Other comments? Any objections 6 to this approach? Any abstentions? Okay. 7 MR. CYMBALSKY: Thanks to you guys for 8 working that out over the past two weeks. Appreciate 9 it. 10 MR. EISNER: Condensate pumps. 11 MS. BARHYDT: Condensate pumps. These pumps 12 defrost melt water to a remotely located drain. DOE 13 believes that these should be on during testing. 14 MR. HON: This is Charlie Hon. These things 15 are exactly the same function as a heater. They work 16 the same way, so I don't believe there's really any 17 difference between the two in consideration. 18 MR. EISNER: Anything else? Any comments? 19 MR. BAUMAN: This is Jeff Bauman from 20 National -- go ahead. 21 MR. MYERS: This is Frank Myers, PVI. 22 Saying that the pump should be on, perhaps should be

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 34 1 energized -- you don't want them actually running all 2 the time. You just want them able to run whenever 3 they're needed. 4 MR. BAUMAN: I -- this is Jeff Bauman from 5 National. I agree with Charlie in however you're 6 handling heaters, you could put them together, kind of 7 say pan heaters or pumps. I mean, I think in ASHRAE 8 72, they're basic accessory items, and they would both 9 be considered under the same group of accessories that 10 would need to be owned and operational during the 11 test. And the pump -- any pan and pump would be 12 emptied before they started initially. 13 MR. EISNER: Are we talking about merging 14 this, or are we talking about going with this 15 language? 16 MS. BARHYDT: Let's leave them separately 17 for these purposes. Obviously, we'll be doing a 18 proposed rule, and we'll see whether it works better 19 for the reg text to combine them or -- but this way, 20 we at least have recorded it as separate concepts. 21 MR. BAUMAN: Yeah, that's fine with me. 22 MR. MYERS: This is Frank again.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 35 1 MR. SHEBIK: This is Ron Shebik -- 2 MR. MYERS: Jeff just used, I think -- 3 MR. SHEBIK: -- for condensate pan heaters, 4 change the word from "on" to "energized," because they 5 won't actually come on until your load or whatever 6 turns the heater on, heating element on. 7 MR. BAUMAN: This is Jeff Bauman from 8 National. I mean, maybe the clarification is you just 9 copy what you've got for pan heaters and say the same 10 thing for the pumps. It's all in operation during the 11 entire test, blah, blah, blah. 12 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah, so just add, I mean -- 13 MR. BAUMAN: And your reservoir pan, yeah, 14 whatever should be -- 15 MS. ARMSTRONG: You can just add pumps 16 there. Just -- in the title, just say "and pumps," 17 just for the purposes of -- and then if we need to 18 MR. KLEISS: Jeff, Lochinvar. I think 19 energized and on could have the same meaning. I heard 20 enabled or operational -- 21 MALE SPEAKER: Operational. 22 MR. KLEISS: -- I think would be preferable.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 36 1 MS. ARMSTRONG: You realize that when 2 these words go through the lawyer review process -- I 3 have no promise as to -- the intent will be 4 maintained, but 5 MR. BAUMAN: I have read enough of the long 6 regulations -- 7 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah. 8 MR. BAUMAN: -- that I can appreciate that. 9 MR. EISNER: Anybody know where we are? 10 MR. WEBBER: Can I ask, just for 11 clarification -- 12 MR. EISNER: Any objections as it's been 13 changed? 14 MR. WEBBER: I had a -- can I ask one 15 question, Jeff? 16 MR. BAUMAN: Yeah. 17 MR. WEBBER: Thanks. Collin Webber from 18 Navigant. I just had a question, if you could go back 19 to the pan heater that Jeff proposed. Just to be 20 consistent with the language of ASHRAE 72, I'm 21 curious. When you referred to the stabilization 22 period, are you referring to determine stabilization

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 37 1 under 72, the actual period we're qualifying, or are 2 you referring to pull-down from room temperature? 3 MR. BAUMAN: Well, you have about -- pull4 downers, again, I call it stabilization. Basically, 5 the unit has to run until it's achieved equilibrium or 6 steady state, I think this is actually called, in the 7 test procedure. 8 MR. WEBBER: Okay. Because the 9 stabilization period is actually measured -- that's 10 the period where you're actually qualifying that it 11 has achieved steady state, and that doesn't include 12 the period that could be days, perhaps, beforehand 13 where you're pulling down from room temperature? 14 MR. BAUMAN: Correct. 15 MR. WEBBER: So I just wanted to make sure 16 that you're referring to the inclusion of the whole 17 thing, from when you plug it in. 18 MR. BAUMAN: Right. 19 MR. WEBBER: Not just when you're taking 20 data for stabilization or for testing purposes. 21 MR. BAUMAN: Yeah, I'm considering the -- so 22 you have the stabilization while you're pulling down.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 38 1 Steady state is your 24 hours where you're maintaining 2 within, you know, a couple degrees your product 3 temperature. 4 MS. ARMSTRONG: Can you put pull-down and 5 stabilization? 6 MR. BAUMAN: And performance testing -- 7 MS. ARMSTRONG: Including pull-down. 8 MR. BAUMAN: -- is when you're actually 9 recording -- 10 MR. WEBBER: Okay. Thank you. 11 MR. BAUMAN: -- recording. 12 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah. Thank you. 13 MR. EISNER: Okay. Other change? Everybody 14 okay now? Any objections? Any abstentions? Okay. 15 Let's go to the next one. 16 MS. BARHYDT: Okay. Still dealing with 17 features of commercial refrigeration equipment, high18 wattage doors. Manufacturers may add extra anti-sweat 19 power to doors for some applications, such as high 20 ambient temperature and humidity. DOE believes these 21 should be operational during the test. If a variable 22 controller is present, it should be utilized.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 39 1 Machines with an on/off switch, the feature should be 2 switched on. 3 MR. EISNER: Questions, comments? 4 MR. HON: This is Charlie Hon. Could you 5 define "variable controller"? 6 MS. ARMSTRONG: Why do we need to? 7 MS. BARHYDT: Like are you saying that we 8 need to actually define that, or are you just asking 9 for clarification? 10 MR. HON: I don't know exactly what you mean 11 by that. 12 MS. ARMSTRONG: Well, maybe -- I think we 13 could take out the word "variable." I mean, my 14 position here is if it has some type of controller 15 other than an on or off switch, that that controller 16 is able to be used. In other words, if you use some 17 type of controller which turns it on in certain 18 conditions rather than just a simple on/off switch, 19 then that controller would be used. And if the test 20 procedure conditions are such that they're -- it 21 doesn't require the use of, you know, these anti-sweat 22 heaters, then it would never be on during tests.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 40 1 MR. HON: Okay. That's why I wasn't sure of 2 what you meant, because some people would consider a 3 static type controller where you could adjust the heat 4 on the door as a controller with a turn knob, and 5 other people would not. That's why I was asking. 6 MR. SACHS: Ashley? 7 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah. 8 MR. SACHS: This is Harvey, and I'm just 9 enough of a cynic to say that the wording on variable 10 controllers should be utilized is an invitation to 11 doing an LG (ph), that that variable controller will 12 be carefully set so that the stipulated dry bulb and 13 wet bulb, it is not going to come on. 14 MS. BARHYDT: Harvey, as we were talking 15 about that, I was actually thinking the exact same 16 thing, and we will make sure to put in language that 17 makes it clear that this has to be for normal 18 operation. You can't set a special set point that 19 turns it on and off above and below, but, man, if 20 you're pegged at the test conditions, it turns off. 21 MR. SACHS: This is Harvey. And, Laura, I 22 shouldn't have used the metaphor the LG test, because

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 41 1 this really only has to be one-sided. It just has to 2 be set so that at that dry bulb and wet bulb, it's not 3 being called as a user-set control, rather than 4 stipulating that it is on some fraction of the times, 5 since I'm not sure that the test conditions are 6 actually representative of use where CRE are 7 installed, in many cases. It may be that stuff would 8 run less in the drier environments of enhanced air 9 conditioning for supermarkets. 10 MR. THARP: There's already verbiage in 10 11 CFR 429 that -- 12 FEMALE SPEAKER: Yes. 13 MR. THARP: -- specifically states you can't 14 use software to get around test procedures. 15 FEMALE SPEAKER: Yes. 16 MR. THARP: Right? 17 FEMALE SPEAKER: Yes. 18 MR. MYERS: This is Frank Myers, PVI. 19 Should there be something in there that if it is a 20 user- adjustable device, that it should be set to 21 maximum, something like that, so that you don't have a 22 game plan with a variable set point?

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 42 1 MR. EISNER: Everybody okay with that 2 suggestion? 3 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah. I was thinking -- I 4 was more thinking of something that was not a user5 adjustable knob. What? Did I confuse you? I'm okay 6 with that position. 7 MR. SACHS: I understand now. 8 MS. ARMSTRONG: So does anyone have an issue 9 with -- if it's a knob, basically it has to be set at 10 the beginning of the test. It doesn't react during 11 the test to the conditions in the room; that it would 12 be set to its full position. However, if you have one 13 that reacts to the position during the test; in other 14 words, it's some type of control mechanism internal to 15 the device, it's going to come on at varying 16 conditions, then that would be allowed to work as it 17 may. 18 MR. BAUMAN: This is Jeff Bauman from 19 National. I'll agree with that. I think you just 20 want to use the word "adjustable controller" rather 21 than knob or anything that -- 22 FEMALE SPEAKER: Right.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 43 1 MR. BAUMAN: You know, it could be a -- if 2 it's a slide, does that -- you know? 3 MALE SPEAKER: Push button. 4 MR. CYMBALSKY: Can we use the word 5 "manual"? Can we use the word "manual" here, like ones 6 that will cover -- 7 MR. BAUMAN: Yeah, manually adjustable or -- 8 yeah. Yeah. 9 MS. ARMSTRONG: Manually -- 10 MR. HON: Unfortunately, I would question -- 11 this is Charlie Hon again. I would question, because 12 a lot of the controllers nowadays will be programmed 13 by an operator, if they know what they're doing, with 14 simple pushing of buttons a few times and saying that 15 -- and you can set these things if you have an ambient 16 humidity control or an ambient temperature control 17 where you would bypass the test. 18 MR. EISNER: Is everybody looking and 19 focusing? 20 MR. HON: Because you can turn the -- 21 MS. ARMSTRONG: I think my -- so this is 22 Ashley. I think the Department's position on this one

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 44 1 is if it has to be set, period, whether it's digitally 2 or manually, it's set in the most -- it's set in the 3 "on" position, the most consumptive position. 4 However, if you've gone to the trouble to 5 integrate some type of control mechanism that 6 automatically reacts with conditions of the 7 environment, then you should get credit for that. 8 MR. HON: This is Charlie Hon. That sounds 9 very, very reasonable. Thank you. 10 MR. EISNER: Everybody focusing on the 11 change? Is there any concern with the whole sentence? 12 For those on the phone, we're still making some 13 adjustment to the wording. 14 MS. ARMSTRONG: I like that. 15 MR. EISNER: All right. As changed. Any 16 questions, any concerns? Are there any objections or 17 abstentions? 18 MR. SACHS: This is Harvey, and I will 19 abstain on this one. I am not yet comfortable with 20 the language. 21 MR. EISNER: Okay. Did everybody hear that? 22 All right. We have one abstention, no --

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 45 1 MR. HUNT: Two abstentions, please. 2 Marshall Hunt, PG&E. 3 MR. EISNER: Two abstentions? All right. 4 Any objections? Anybody want to try to work out the 5 abstentions, or are you okay with where we are? 6 MS. BARHYDT: Actually, before we go on, so 7 is your concern with the approach or with the 8 language? 9 MR. SACHS: This is Harvey Sachs. Laura, 10 I'm something of a generalist, and in my mind, the 11 ideal anti-sweat heater senses when any part of the 12 edge is starting to get some condensate, turns on the 13 heater just long enough for that to be evaporated, and 14 turns itself off. 15 That's what we would be looking for, and I'm 16 not yet sure that this thing is moving -- this 17 language is moving us toward that, and I'm not sure 18 yet that I'm hearing a consensus from the people who 19 really understand this equipment that this is not 20 going to be subject to some extreme variations in 21 interpretation. 22 MR. HUNT: This is Marshall Hunt, PG&E. My

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 46 1 abstention is because I would like to have time, if 2 the group would allow me, to get a hold of the SoCal 3 Edison Refrigeration Lab. They've done an awful lot 4 of research on this, plus we in PG&E have a Food 5 Service Lab that looks at this. So I would want to, 6 before I voted, check with those experts. 7 MR. EISNER: How long would that take? 8 MR. HUNT: We could try right now. 9 MR. EISNER: I mean, we can -- 10 MR. HUNT: I can try for tomorrow. 11 MR. EISNER: We could always come back to 12 this particular issue if it would get us through an 13 abstention. 14 MR. CYMBALSKY: My understanding is that 15 abstentions are not nos, so -- 16 MR. EISNER: That's right, correct. 17 MR. CYMBALSKY: -- this would move forward. 18 MR. EISNER: We could move forward, but I -- 19 MS. ARMSTRONG: I would vote on it. 20 MR. EISNER: -- saying if we can get this 21 rid of later on, I don't think -- is there anybody who 22 would object going back to it then?

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 47 1 MR. CYMBALSKY: Well, no, I mean, I think if 2 -- abstentions are implied yeses. It's just not 3 saying yes, but it's not saying no. So the vote -- 4 we're voting, and there's two abstentions. It's a 5 yes. 6 MR. SACHS: This -- 7 MALE SPEAKER: Procedurally, yes. 8 MR. SACHS: John, this is Harvey, and 9 procedurally, I certainly agree with you. My hope 10 with an abstention instead of a no is to establish a 11 bookmark -- 12 MR. CYMBALSKY: Okay. 13 MR. SACHS: -- that says that we have not 14 closed this issue, because I think we agree on the 15 intent, but we're not yet sure -- 16 MS. ARMSTRONG: That's fine. 17 MR. SACHS: -- this is the language. 18 MS. ARMSTRONG: So I would just recommend 19 voting, and then if, for some odd reason, once you 20 guys have a chance to talk to them, if they have 21 additional clarifications or if you have additional 22 clarifications that you want to present to the group,

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 48 1 bring it up at a later time. But that way, we can 2 vote and move forward if we need to. 3 MR. SACHS: Well, you said we did vote. 4 John said we did vote. 5 MS. ARMSTRONG: Oh, well, John voted. 6 MR. CYMBALSKY: I heard two abstentions, and 7 so that's 8 MR. EISNER: Comment in the back of the 9 room? 10 MR. NESHAN: Massoud Neshan, Southern Store 11 Fixtures. One question I have, when you are testing a 12 case with doors with higher wattage heaters on it, 13 that's usually applicable to when you have a single 14 case. A lot of supermarket display cases are 15 manufactured, and someone else is controlling it, 16 including the heaters on it. So here we manufactured 17 a case, no controllers on. There's heaters on that 18 someone else is going to control. Now, how are you 19 going to test it? How I'm going to test it? 20 MS. ARMSTRONG: Is the heat -- I mean, are 21 you asking if heaters get added once they're installed 22 in the field?

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 49 1 MR. NESHAN: They are wired to a central 2 energy management system. 3 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah, yeah, yeah. I mean, 4 that's a different issue, but if you have the heater 5 when the unit's shipped, it's got an on or off switch, 6 right? 7 MR. NESHAN: No, no, they don't. That's 8 what I'm saying. No, they don't. 9 MS. ARMSTRONG: They have wires? 10 MR. NESHAN: There are wires for the 11 junction box -- 12 MS. ARMSTRONG: So -- 13 MR. NESHAN: -- where they take those wires 14 in someplace else. 15 MS. ARMSTRONG: Okay. So the wires would -- 16 the lab would have to turn it on for testing. 17 MR. NESHAN: So you're going to test the 18 high- wattage door in a 75-degree room, ambient, at 55 19 relative percent of humidity, when you don't need it? 20 MS. ARMSTRONG: With them on. 21 MR. NESHAN: Excuse me, but that's 22 ridiculous.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 50 1 MS. DANE: This is Mary from Traulsen. I 2 think I understand. Without the control telling it 3 when to turn on and off, isn't it running in just a 4 wide-open state? 5 MR. NESHAN: Yes. 6 MS. DANE: Okay. Then I'd have to agree 7 with him. 8 I mean, the test house guys are sitting 9 here. Maybe they can explain how they would keep it 10 from turning on and off and running in a real-life 11 condition, but I can't see where letting it run wide 12 open without the controller makes sense. 13 MS. ARMSTRONG: I guess I -- so if it's 14 shipped with wires, it's always -- is it always 15 connected to a controller that's responding to 16 environmental conditions? It's never connected to a 17 controller that just has a user-adjustable 18 MS. DANE: I think what he's saying is 19 there's different conditions. How does he know which 20 one you're going to run it? 21 MS. ARMSTRONG: I get that part. I mean, I 22 understand what he's saying; right? I'm trying to

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 51 1 understand -- you guys ship these things with wires, 2 without the controller in some cases. 3 MR. BAUMAN: Okay. We do not at National. 4 I don't -- Massoud, how frequent are products like 5 that -- how common are products like that? 6 MR. NESHAN: Well, these days, supermarkets, 7 they use a lot of electronic controls, energy 8 management system. They want to control cases, 9 individual cases. So there's a lot of very 10 sophisticated control system they're installing. They 11 ask us to wire the cases separately so they can turn 12 on the lights, on and off, based on the humidity, turn 13 on the defrost heaters on and on (sic). They do 14 things that it's out of our control. It is their 15 specification that we have to manufacture these cases 16 to. 17 Now, if I was manufacturing a two-door case, 18 a three-door case that was going to stand by itself, 19 the case has its own controller. For the supermarket, 20 these are all end-to-end display cases that -- 21 controlled by someone else. 22 MS. ARMSTRONG: Okay. So can I ask Mike,

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 52 1 how do you guys do it now? Not to put you on the spot 2 or anything. 3 MR. STEM: No, I mean, if it's not 4 controlled, if it's not shipped with controls, then we 5 would not test them with them on, unless it 6 specifically says that in the instructions. I mean, 7 right now, it's open. 8 MS. ARMSTRONG: So the Department's position 9 on that would be that would be a loophole. That would 10 be an equitable test for those that are shipped with a 11 controller. We would like to see some type of 12 equitable way to test those, whether it be you need to 13 ship them with some type of method of the test -- you 14 know, the test lab being able to control them or being 15 able to turn them on or off. 16 MR. STEM: Or define -- 17 MS. ARMSTRONG: But it needs to be 18 equitable. 19 MR. STEM: Yeah. Or define the conditions, 20 when they come on. If they -- you know, if you could 21 define it, then you could definitely control it that 22 way, but -- without --

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 53 1 MS. ARMSTRONG: Or we could also define a 2 default by you, I mean, where they -- it could be 3 represented. 4 MR. NESHAN: In answer to your question -- 5 Neshan again. The conditions are 75, you know, 64- 6 degree wet bulb. That's it. That's -- as defined by 7 ASHRAE, and AHRI's accepted it, and DOE has accepted 8 it. That's the design conditions. Anything above 9 that, that should come on. Anything at that point or 10 below should not come on. I mean, if the test 11 facility wants to test it that way, it's already 12 predefined. 13 MR. BAUMAN: This is Jeff Bauman from 14 National. I think what you're really getting into 15 here is, again, under the conditions, if you think 16 about what the conditions are for the test or 17 whatever, what you'd almost have to define is that you 18 can't allow condensation to accumulate on the door or 19 the cabinet or excess. I mean, that's what the 20 heaters are there for. If, under those conditions or 21 whatever, you don't need heat to generate that, they 22 wouldn't normally be on in actual use or certain

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 54 1 conditions, I mean, versus saying you need to be on or 2 off. 3 Again, it's characteristic to the 4 construction and the open cases, closed cases, you 5 know, those types of things, but I think that only 6 gets into which -- you know, whether there's going to 7 be condensation that you would have to normally get 8 rid of. 9 MS. BARHYDT: On these cases, is -- what is 10 your standard offering? Are you specially ordering 11 these because people are ordering it that way, or is 12 that just your standard way of offering the case? 13 MR. NESHAN: Our standard case is to run it 14 in the 75/55. They have to specify they want to run 15 it in the -- example, a case is going to go up to 16 Guam. The store doesn't even have air conditioning, 17 so they ask for additional heaters, and then they 18 control it. So we have to put additional heaters in 19 the case so when the summertime and the humidity's up, 20 they have to do something. I mean, but that's a 21 special customer spec and customer request. Standard 22 cases are 75/55 operating conditions. There's no

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 55 1 extra heaters, nothing. 2 MR. HON: This is Charlie Hon. I have one 3 other question here. We keep hearing about extra 4 heaters versus standard heaters, and that throws 5 another question into the entire formula, because 6 you're only trying to define high-wattage heaters here 7 when we really need to be defining all door heaters. 8 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah. But we can change the 9 category to be door heaters. All of them would be 10 included. There is no such thing as standard versus 11 not. 12 MR. BAUMAN: Yeah. This is Jeff Bauman from 13 National, and we were thinking about that earlier and 14 that it really gets down to door heaters and heaters 15 around the door openings and such, how you manage 16 those, and that was obviously a concern previously 17 with EPA and, you know, coming to a unified standard 18 is, I think, going to help everybody out there. 19 But we would -- again, speaking to -- we 20 have some cases that customers want to -- in a large 21 facility, they want to wire in additional controllers. 22 It would be -- we would provide them guidance how to

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 56 1 do the wiring or whatever, but for testing or 2 certifications or whatever, they would be operated 3 normally as if they were wired in as part of that 4 product or whatever. We wouldn't have wires, you 5 know, disconnected for the testing or anything. 6 MR. MYERS: This is Frank Myers, PVI. I 7 heard a discussion earlier that sounded like there 8 might be a suggestion that the heaters be operated 9 during the test as required to prevent condensate from 10 forming. Is that practical, or did I mishear that? 11 Because that would be one way to do it. They'll 12 operate as much as they need to operate. That would 13 encourage tighter seals and better insulation. 14 MS. ARMSTRONG: So, I mean, my -- this is 15 Ashley from DOE. My interpretation of the discussion 16 is that for the units that -- I mean, that's how 17 they're designed, right? The units come with 18 controllers that are designed to do just that, that in 19 certain conditions which would generate condensate on 20 the doors, that they're designed to turn on. However, 21 if a unit is shipped without a controller to tell it 22 when to react, how -- what do you do during testing?

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 57 1 And the question is we need a way -- what 2 we're stuck with here is finding a way such that the 3 unit that's shipped without a controller, that the lab 4 can control it in a manner that terms -- that makes 5 those heaters react when they're needed. I don't have 6 the answer to it, but we want to treat them equitably, 7 whether they're shipped with a controller or shipped 8 without. They're operated in the field with one. 9 MR. MYERS: Right. No, I agree. 10 MS. ARMSTRONG: So if the controller's on or 11 off, it should just be on. If the controls are -- if 12 the controller is userable -- requires the user to set 13 a single position, then the user sets it, period. The 14 test lab says that. 15 If the controller varies with the 16 environmental conditions, whether it's shipped with 17 the unit or whether it's, you know, controlled using 18 this large energy management system, then it should be 19 controlled by the test lab in that manner. The only 20 outstanding issue is how does the test lab control it 21 if it doesn't get shipped with a controller? 22 MR. MYERS: Okay. All right.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 58 1 MS. ARMSTRONG: And I don't know the 2 products enough to know the answer to that. That's 3 what -- the answer we're looking for. 4 MR. BAUMAN: Yeah. This is Jeff Bauman from 5 National. I mean, the thing that hits me when you 6 talk about that is, you know, that could be in a 7 manufacturer's special instructions that, you know, 8 that model has some type of controllers. They -- you 9 know, they could say, "You have to order this 10 additional controller with it" or something. 11 I may be oversimplifying, but it sounds like 12 that would be the -- one of those conditions where you 13 have -- the manufacturer requires some type of 14 external wiring control for the humidity. You know, 15 maybe that's a way to do it. 16 MR. EISNER: Anybody have suggested 17 language? 18 MS. ARMSTRONG: So, I mean, we can work out 19 the details of how. I mean, that's the generalized 20 position, those three things. If it's, you know -- I 21 think we have -- I have shaking heads, at least. You 22 can't see it on the phone, but we have general

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 59 1 agreement under the overall intent. It's just a 2 matter of if the unit isn't shipped with a controller, 3 how does, you know, the Mikes of the room or -- how do 4 you guys control it when it's in your lab to make it 5 react like it would be, like it should be. 6 MR. STEM: And I think, you know, to go a 7 little further than that is how does it react in the 8 real world, and are -- is that the intended to 9 simulate that same, you know, percent duty cycle of 10 the -- or not? 11 MS. ARMSTRONG: Well, it's going -- 12 MR. STEM: I mean, we can turn things on and 13 off or turn it on for the entire period, just, you 14 know, while wiring in some dummy switches or putting a 15 pit controller in it or however you want to do it, 16 however we decide to do it, but we still need to know 17 -- I guess conditions wasn't the right word last time 18 because I'm not talking about ambient, but, I mean, 19 percent run time or duty cycle or something like that. 20 We kind of need to know a little more. 21 MR. EISNER: Anything else? Suggestions on 22 language?

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 60 1 MS. ARMSTRONG: I mean, another -- one idea 2 would be to -- for the purposes of coming up with a 3 rating and certification, you have to use some type of 4 controller. I assume you would have one that if we 5 asked to test that unit, we would get one. You know, 6 and it would more or less be a dummy controller for 7 the purposes of testing. When you ship it, you would 8 ship it out with the same control algorithm, but it 9 would be connected to a larger 10 MR. KOJACK: This is Mike Kojack with UL. 11 Couldn't we approach it with knowing how -- what the 12 wattage of the heaters are and then calculate the time 13 they would be on during the test and just give them a 14 penalty for it instead of actually trying to have some 15 kind of control system control it? Because you don't 16 really know exactly the end user, what controller 17 they're going to be using and what configuration 18 they're going to be setting it to run it at. 19 So, you know, how would you be able to test 20 it, you know, not knowing exactly what the -- you 21 know, the end user's controller's going to be or what 22 the settings are going to be at?

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 61 1 MS. ARMSTRONG: We're not going for end user 2 here, right? I mean, I think that's the key. We have 3 test procedure conditions, period. You have test 4 procedure conditions which, under however it's 5 controlled, however it was designed to operate, it's 6 either going to come on or off as needed. It may come 7 on sometimes, it may go off sometimes. 8 To Harvey's point, an ideal controller would 9 just come on enough to get rid of that condensate and 10 then go right back off. So what we're trying to do is 11 capture that. 12 MR. KOJACK: Yeah. That's what I'm saying 13 is, you know, if the end user has -- 14 MS. ARMSTRONG: There's a different between 15 a calculation and a verifiable method to test. Right? 16 MR. KOJACK: But if you put on a controller 17 that's very basic on this unit that's going to have a 18 very complicated controller, you're going to be 19 hurting their rating because it's going to be very 20 rudimentary. On/off, on/off. It's not going to -- 21 MR. RIVEST: Excuse me. Do you always have 22 a case with -- so having a controller is something

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 62 1 that's available on our products. If we only tested 2 products that have your controller built in, that way 3 we would avoid having any calculations. It would be 4 based on your determination of when a heater has to 5 come on for your case. That would -- that's the 6 energy that would be consumed. You understand what 7 I'm saying? 8 MR. KOJACK: I don't know what -- are you 9 asking a question? I don't make cases. 10 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah, he doesn't. He's a 11 test lab. So 12 MR. RIVEST: So you ship products without 13 controllers, and you ship products with controllers. 14 The product that's shipped with a controller is what 15 you have figured is the best way to operate your 16 product. So if we were just to test products with 17 controllers and product that doesn't have a controller 18 would be -- would test it. I mean, it would be the 19 same as -- so long as there's a product identical with 20 a controller, then there's no concern. 21 MR. NESHAN: This is Neshan again. Let me 22 clarify something. I mean, we went from high-wattage

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 63 1 heaters to just door heaters. There are certain cases 2 that, even under 75/55, must have heaters. Those are 3 going to be on. It's not designed for -- to come on 4 when it gets to 60 percent relative humidity. It is 5 on. 6 Now, some people might have devices to turn 7 it off if the humidity drops below 40 percent or 8 whatever. That's for energy savings they have. But 9 since we test these cases under 75/55, and if those 10 heaters must be on, they're going to be on. That's 11 how the case is designed. 12 The question is when you have to go to a 13 high humidity or ambient conditions that are not 14 design conditions, that's really the question. 15 MR. RIVEST: But it is a question? Because 16 the test procedure doesn't simulate those extreme 17 conditions. 18 MR. NESHAN: But here's -- that's what I'm 19 saying. Because when we test these cases, you're 20 always at 75/55. So those heaters, those extra 21 wattage heaters, should not come into use, period. 22 MS. ARMSTRONG: And that's fine, as long as

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 64 1

-- 2 MR. RIVEST: Correct. So we don't -- 3 MR. NESHAN: So whether the test lab has the 4 capability or not -- has or not -- 5 MS. ARMSTRONG: There's no issue there. 6 That's not an issue. 7 MR. NESHAN: I know that's not the issue, 8 but the issue is so if they maintain a 70/55 (sic), 9 that thing should not come on, period. Okay? 10 MR. RIVEST: Unless you ship it without a 11 controller. 12 MR. NESHAN: Well -- 13 MR. RIVEST: Right? 14 MR. NESHAN: Correct. As I said -- 15 MR. RIVEST: In that case, there's two 16 choices: either you supply the controller that you 17 would normally for the purposes of the test, or it'll 18 be short-circuited. That happens all the time. 19 MR. NESHAN: The problem is I don't 20 manufacture those controllers. I don't even deal with 21 those controllers. Someone else supplies it. I have 22 nothing to do with it.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 65 1 MR. RIVEST: You never ship cases with 2 controllers? 3 MR. NESHAN: No, sir. 4 MS. DANE: This is Mary from Traulsen. 5 Sometimes the test labs have a simulator already built 6 to the test procedure. I mean, each lab is different, 7 so take that with a grain of salt, but they are able 8 to simulate conditions if they had -- if there was 9 some way that that would be one of the things that 10 were required, that it be set up to be able to 11 simulate a board like he's discussing, you know, a 12 management system, that that would assure -- 13 MR. RIVEST: I don't think simulating a 14 management system is an issue here. We're not trying 15 to do that. We're just trying to replicate the energy 16 use of the product in test conditions with a 17 controller that would normally be there. 18 MS. DANE: I'm just hearing him say that he 19 doesn't want to get into the habit -- he doesn't 20 either want to have his cabinets hardwired, or he 21 doesn't want to -- he doesn't have the ability to ship 22 it with a control, and he doesn't want to be penalized

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 66 1 by having to wire it direct. That's, I think, what 2 I'm hearing. 3 MR. NESHAN: I don't even manufacture the 4 door. Someone else makes the door. We just put it on 5 our case. I have no clue what -- how they are going 6 to control it. Someone else does the control. You 7 see what I'm saying? 8 MR. RIVEST: No. 9 MS. DANE: I see. 10 MR. NESHAN: Okay. Then you have -- 11 MS. ARMSTRONG: I mean -- 12 MR. RIVEST: Well, you're a manufacturer of 13 what? 14 MR. NESHAN: A refrigerator. Okay? 15 MR. RIVEST: Without doors? 16 MR. NESHAN: With or without doors, but the 17 doors, we don't manufacture the glass doors and all 18 that. That stuff comes from someplace else. 19 MR. RIVEST: But you assemble a fully 20 functional product that you rate -- 21 MR. NESHAN: Correct. 22 MR. RIVEST: -- right?

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 67 1 MR. NESHAN: And we design it for 75/55. We 2 design it for 75/55, period. Okay? Now, if someone 3 else wants to run it at higher ambient conditions, 4 that's their business. 5 MR. RIVEST: Nobody wants to run it at 6 higher ambient conditions. 7 MR. NESHAN: No, as I said, there are places 8 that they do because they cannot control their air 9 conditioning system. 10 MS. ARMSTRONG: But what we're trying to 11 tell you here is that the test procedure conditions 12 are what they are. They're not going to -- we're not 13 going to run your case at higher ambient conditions 14 just to see if a controller comes on. What we are 15 saying is under the test procedure conditions, we need 16 to be able to control that heater. The lab needs to 17 be able to engage the heater, as it would be 18 operational, under the exact test procedure and 19 conditions in the field. 20 MR. NESHAN: Then the labs better be 21 prepared and be equipped to do those kind of testing. 22 MS. ARMSTRONG: I --

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 68 1 MR. NESHAN: The burden should be on the 2 test lab, not on us, then. 3 MS. ARMSTRONG: You have to rate your 4 equipment. 5 MR. NESHAN: We rate equipment -- 6 MS. ARMSTRONG: What are you going to do? 7 MR. NESHAN: -- at 75/55, period, not at 65, 8 not at 85, or anything else. If that needs to be 9 tested at a higher conditions, that would be their -- 10 MS. ARMSTRONG: So I think we move on from 11 this. This is our language. There's no testing at 12 other conditions. The test procedure conditions are 13 what they are. But the question still remains about 14 how -- I think at this point, the best idea the 15 Department's heard is that if you can't supply a 16 controller with your unit to make it functionally work 17 at the test procedure conditions, then the heater 18 should be short-circuited to be on. 19 MR. SACHS: I object to the term "short20 circuited." 21 MS. ARMSTRONG: Well, okay. That's fine. I 22 don't know what -- that language --

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 69 1 MALE SPEAKER: Wired, maybe. 2 MS. ARMSTRONG: Hardwired. That's fine. 3 MR. BAUMAN: She got away with user ability. 4 MS. ARMSTRONG: Fine. It will be on. I 5 don't think my lawyers would give that language -- 6 MR. SACHS: It wasn't your word. 7 MR. EISNER: We have a comment from Bruce 8 Hailmeyer. "At 00, we have customers of remote 9 equipment that use storewide controls to reduce 10 energy. It would be a waste of resources to provide an 11 individual control on the case and provide a storewide 12 control in the store." 13 MR. RIVEST: They could just supply the 14 control for the purposes of the test. 15 MS. ARMSTRONG: They buy one. One. 16 MS. DANE: Why can't the test labs have 17 that? I mean, why do we have to -- 18 MR. RIVEST: They can. 19 MS. ARMSTRONG: We don't regulate the test 20 labs. 21 MR. RIVEST: It has not been specified -- 22 MS. DANE: Oh, I understand that, but I

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 70 1 think they should have the equipment to perform the 2 testing correctly. 3 MR. RIVEST: No. 4 MR. SACHS: Ashley, I'm -- this is Harvey, 5 and I'm finding myself sympathetic to Mary's point 6 that if it's shipped without a controller, I don't 7 understand why the test lab can't simulate that 8 controller. 9 MS. DANE: They simulate all kinds of tests 10 for us now. If they're -- if they can -- if they are 11 ISO-1725 to do certain test standards, they are able 12 to simulate certain controls, so why not be assured 13 that they can run this one? Why do we have to go out 14 and invest and send it and then hope the test lab 15 sends it back to us in good working condition? I mean 16 17 MR. STEM: This is Mike with Intertek. We 18 have plenty of PID controllers, cascade and loop. We 19 can simulate -- 20 MS. DANE: Right. 21 MR. STEM: -- any energy management system 22 you want. The problem is do you want me to turn that

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 71 1 heater on at the test conditions, below the test 2 conditions, above the test conditions? I need to know 3 when you want me to turn that on, and if that's not 4 documented somewhere -- 5 MS. ARMSTRONG: We don't want you to turn it 6 on. 7 MR. RIVEST: Mike, Mike. No, all we want is 8 for the thing to come on and come off during the test, 9 that test conditions. Right? My suggestion was they 10 supply a controller for those people who don't have 11 energy management systems, but that controller be used 12 because it's the controller that the manufacturer has 13 decided -- 14 MR. STEM: Right, and it's going to have 15 those 16

-- 17 MR. RIVEST: -- will work well. 18 MR. STEM: And it's going to have those 19 points -- 20 MR. RIVEST: And what I'm saying is if -- 21 MR. STEM: -- programmed in. 22 MR. RIVEST: -- if a unit is selected for

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 72 1 tests, there can be some collaboration here, some 2 communication with the manufacturer so that you're 3 using correct -- you know, the correct controller. 4 MR. KOJACK: This is Mike Kojack with UL, 5 but -- 6 MR. RIVEST: We're not asking there be a 7 control on every unit built. 8 MS. ARMSTRONG: What we're essentially 9 asking is the manufacturer decide the control scheme 10 for their heaters. 11 MALE SPEAKER: Right. 12 MS. ARMSTRONG: In other words, we're not 13 asking you to do it. The Department's not doing it. 14 The manufacturer is electing the control scheme for 15 their unit, and that's what -- how the wattage gets 16 accounted. That's the issue. 17 MR. STEM: I agree with that. 18 MS. ARMSTRONG: So I realize I can give you 19 any test conditions, and you can turn on any test 20 conditions. The question is what should those -- 21 whether it should be on or off. And we see that as a 22 manufacturer decision.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 73 1 MR. STEM: Correct. Yeah, that's all I was 2 saying whenever they said that, you know, the lab 3 should have the ability to simulate the energy 4 management systems. 5 MS. ARMSTRONG: Right. 6 MR. STEM: We can. However, we don't know - 7

- 8 MR. KOJACK: The test procedure doesn't -- 9 MS. ARMSTRONG: I'm not -- 10 MR. KOJACK: -- provide for that. 11 MS. ARMSTRONG: Exactly. And I'm not asking 12 you to control their unit for them. They have a 13 control scheme that it's offered with. I realize that 14 when it's installed in the field, it may be operated 15 under a variety of different operational points and a 16 variety of different control schemes. What we're 17 asking is what do you offer? 18 MR. KLEISS: Jeff Kleiss, Lochinvar. From 19 outside of the industry, I have a question about these 20 doors. Are there designs to the doors that make them 21 less prone to the fogging or issues that would affect 22 the controls or power consumption needed for the doors

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 74 1 to be clear? 2 MR. HON: This is Charlie Hon. I've got 3 several comments I've been holding back. Since we 4 really don't have any horses in this race, I'm trying 5 to avoid this topic, but there are certain definitions 6 we haven't discussed. Number one is that the 7 objective of the door heater is to have the door, 8 after it's been open for some short period of time, 9 where there's condensate on the inside of the door, to 10 remove that condensate in some reasonable window of 11 time so that the next customer, when they walk up to 12 the door, can see product therein. 13 That can be done one of several ways. Door 14 construction is one of the ways you can do it because 15 if a door is constructed with very, very good 16 insulation, it is going to sweat more than a door with 17 bad insulation because the delta T of the glass, when 18 you put a cold glass in a warm environment, by opening 19 the door, there's going to be condensation on it if 20 it's cold. Number two issue is how long is long 21 enough between the door closing and removal of the 22 viewing obstruction, of the fog?

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 75 1 Number three is there's a plastic sheeting 2 in the market today which is put on the inside of 3 doors that's very expensive, but it also reduces the 4 amount of fog, you know, on the door by making the 5 surface conditions different. So there's a lot of 6 games that can be played here, but we still have to 7 find what this means. 8 MR. BALLO: This is Tim Ballo with 9 Earthjustice, and I have a question that maybe just 10 reflects that I'm not understanding this issue. The 11 Department frequently has issues in test procedures 12 where you follow the manufacturer's instructions for 13 setup, and that sounds like what we're -- the 14 direction we're heading with products that are sold 15 without controllers. 16 But if I'm a manufacturer and I never ship a 17 product with a controller and you're asking me to give 18 you set points for if you hook up a controller to it, 19 when should that controller activate the door heaters, 20 it seems like it's in my interest to say, well, you 21 activate the door heaters pretty much never, and the 22 unit will just sit there during the test, completely

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 76 1 fogged up, and I'm never going to sell that control to 2 a customer, so it's no skin off my nose if they fog up 3 the entire test, because that's not really 4 representative of how it's going to run in the field. 5 So I'm just wondering if that's a danger here. 6 MR. EISNER: All right. We've got a comment 7 or suggestion from Ed Westoff (ph). With a fridge, 8 they use max heat in one portion of the test, then 9 shut off and average between the two. Why not include 10 this test approach? 11 Your response? 12 Okay. Well, I suggest we take about a ten13 minute break, come back, and decide how we want to 14 handle this issue. Maybe somebody will come up with 15 some perfect wording. Come back about 11:30. 16 (Whereupon, a brief recess was taken.) 17 MR. EISNER: All right. The countdown 18 starts now. You have 30 seconds to get to your seat. 19 All right. Raise your hand if you have a 20 suggestion for resolving the problem we had before the 21 break. Anybody work it out during the break? All 22 right. Well, Ashley's got something she's put up on

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 77 1 the screen I'll let her talk about. 2 MS. ARMSTRONG: Oh. Well, I just kicked the 3 can. So I defined -- this is Ashley from DOE. So I 4 defined the -- the way that we see it, there are three 5 options. There's a machine with a manual control, 6 there's a machine with a user-selectable setting 7 control, which is digital, and then there's a machine 8 with an automatic controller, right, that adjusts on 9 and off to environmental conditions. 10 So I obviously characterized those three 11 with how they should be used, and then the outstanding 12 issue would be how will DOE test units if they're not 13 shipped with a controller from the point of 14 manufacture? And we're going to have to deal with 15 that through notice and comment anyway, so I just said 16 DOE will initiate a process to address it, if that's - 17

- 18 MR. SHEBIK: Ashley, this is Ron Shebik from 19 Hussmann. Okay. So I understand fully, and the rest 20 of the people on the phone, I guess, understand. What 21 -- when you say DOE will initiate a process to address 22 how units should be tested, what exactly do you mean

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 78 1 by that? What steps are you going to take -- are 2 taken by that? 3 MS. ARMSTRONG: It's just going to be some 4 type of notice and comment. So you're going to be 5 able to -- it will either be proposed guidance, 6 testing guidance, or a proposed rule for the test 7 procedure, but both will be open for comment. 8 MR. SHEBIK: Okay. So in the meantime, 9 while this is being discussed, can we assume those 10 configurations that fall under that category are not 11 subject to any kind of testing at this time? 12 MS. ARMSTRONG: No. Right now we have no 13 exclusions, period, to what DOE could test. 14 MS. BARHYDT: Keep in mind, though -- this 15 is Laura from DOE. Keep in mind that at this point, 16 there's not even a complete package recommendation to 17 go to the ASRAC. We'll have to do a Notice of 18 Proposed Rulemaking. So it's not like there's not 19 going to be some time before anything in this -- that 20 we're discussing today would actually go into the 21 regulations. 22 MR. AMRANE: Karim Amrane. But at the same

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 79 1 time, there is this deadline of December 31st, right? 2 MS. BARHYDT: Yes. 3 MR. AMRANE: What needs to happen between 4 now and then? I mean 5 MS. ARMSTRONG: We have to agree. That's 6 the first thing. 7 MR. AMRANE: Well, but we're saying that we 8 -- DOE's going to address it, but at the same time, 9 manufacturers have to rate their products and have to 10 submit it to DOE by December 31st. 11 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yep. We will have to -- I 12 mean, we need to go through all this and see where we 13 have agreement to send to ASRAC, and then the December 14 31st issue will be the last thing on the table to deal 15 with. 16 MR. EISNER: And the last bullet could be 17 changed to language that says -- the last dash, 18 actually -- "If units are shipped with a -- not 19 shipped with a controller from the point of 20 manufacture, it shall be tested in accordance with a 21 process that ensures a level playing field." 22 Something along those lines, that DOE might have to

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 80 1 issue guidance, but that would be their objective, as 2 I understand it. 3 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yep. That's exactly 4 correct. 5 MR. EISNER: If you're more comfortable with 6 that language, I'm assuming that DOE would be willing 7 to put it in. 8 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yep. 9 MR. EISNER: It's just they're looking for 10 help, as I hear it, on how to test them in way that 11 ensures a level playing field. 12 MS. ARMSTRONG: Assure -- assures. 13 MR. EISNER: Not saying that they disagree 14 with the problems that have been raised. They're 15 simply saying, how do we determine the playing field 16 is level, if those devices are not going to be better 17 off or worse off than the first three bullets that are 18 up there? 19 MR. HON: This is Charlie Hon. And the 20 first bullet is not mandatory language. 21 MS. ARMSTRONG: Is it mandatory currently; 22 is that what you're asking?

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 81 1 MS. BARHYDT: No. Adjust the -- machines 2 that have a manual control must be turned on. 3 MS. ARMSTRONG: Oh. 4 MS. BARHYDT: Instead of can. 5 MS. ARMSTRONG: Change can to must. 6 MR. EISNER: Did you hear that, Charlie? 7 MR. HON: Yes, I see it. 8 MR. EISNER: Now -- 9 MR. BAUMAN: This is Jeff from National. 10 What's the difference between manual and user 11 selectable? 12 MS. ARMSTRONG: In my mind, I differentiate 13 those between something that's like a knob or 14 physically you do versus something that you like key 15 in on a digital display, but maybe there's not. 16 That's what I was thinking of. I don't know if those 17 are the right words. 18 MR. BAUMAN: Okay. My mind, it -- on/off 19 would come under user selectable, but that's my mind. 20 MS. ARMSTRONG: So you don't think we need 21 the first one? You think the second one takes care of 22 it all?

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 82 1 MR. BAUMAN: I would think so. Again -- 2 MS. ARMSTRONG: Okay. 3 MR. BAUMAN: -- Charlie and the other folks 4 that are out there can 5 MR. HON: This is Charlie. That makes 6 perfectly good sense. 7 MR. SACHS: This is Harvey again. One of 8 the advantages of being fairly shallow, but broad, is 9 when I think about analogs and other rating methods, 10 one of them stimulated by conversation with Judd is a 11 procedure called the degradation coefficient in a 12 central air conditioner proceeding, which basically 13 says here's the default value, which in this case 14 would be some fraction of hours of the test times the 15 wattage -- total wattage of the heaters, and we're 16 going to use that unless you, as a manufacturer, 17 present us with a better alternative for your 18 particular unit. 19 That would seem to meet some of the level 20 playing field issues and seem to encourage innovation. 21 It would seem to be adaptable to the maximum range of 22 products. Now, if you all don't like this, blame

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 83 1 Judd. 2 MS. ARMSTRONG: I think that's pretty 3 similar to what Mike was suggesting earlier, that we 4 use a default of it's on because that's the default 5 for the ones, but, yes. 6 MR. SACHS: It's different in kind from the 7 -- this is Harvey again -- in that it suggests that 8 it's not running open, on, through the entire test 9 procedure. 10 MS. ARMSTRONG: I understand. 11 MR. SACHS: But I think, Ashley, that's a 12 pretty important difference, because if, in fact, the 13 default controller's on 25 percent of the time instead 14 of 90 percent of the time, it makes an enormous 15 difference in how things are handled. It's an idea. 16 It's something that works with your processes with 17 providing guidance or procedure. It seems to me that 18 Judd had a good idea, and I wanted to make sure, since 19 he's shy, that we did get it out there. 20 MS. ARMSTRONG: I think it's fair to note in 21 this CCD (ph) calculation, though, that is a pretty 22 conservative number. I mean, there's a pretty good

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 84 1 push to run that test because you get, in the most 2 case, a better CCD every time you run that test. 3 MR. SACHS: Aw, schucks. I never thought 4 they would have realized that. 5 MR. BAUMAN: This is Jeff Bauman from 6 National. It seems like the second bullet under there 7 is sort of incomplete. The first one talks about 8 whether it's user-selectable, saying it must be turned 9 on, and the second one just says with an automatic 10 controller that turns on and off based on environment. 11 It just should be running, and it's automatic. And I 12 would also say too that's a automatic, non-adjustable, 13 or non-user-adjustable. 14 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yes. So an automatic non15 user-adjustable controller. And then should be -- 16 MALE SPEAKER: Be operational. 17 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah. Must be operating in 18 its automatic state, or I don't know what the right 19 words are, but I think that gets the gist across. 20 MR. CYMBALSKY: The lawyers are going to 21 change that to "shall." I know it. 22 MS. BARHYDT: No, actually.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 85 1 MR. CYMBALSKY: Really? 2 MS. ARMSTRONG: We'll have a lawyer fight. 3 MR. CYMBALSKY: Every "must" becomes 4 "shall." 5 MS. ARMSTRONG: That'll be like a "We need 6 to meet." 7 MR. EISNER: Any other comments on this? 8 MR. BAUMAN: All right. Third bullet too, I 9 guess, under -- I think that if a unit is not shipped 10 with a controller from the point of manufacture, I 11 think -- again, understanding this is going to be 12 worked out later, but it's really the unit is not 13 shipped with controller, but is tended to use a 14 controller or whatever. I think that's the third 15 condition that we're talking about, not just -- not 16 shipped with a controller, because it 17 MS. ARMSTRONG: So if it's not shipped with 18 a controller and intended to be used with a controller 19

-- 20 MR. BAUMAN: Yes. 21 MS. ARMSTRONG: Change -- put the "and 22 intended" after "manufacture." Yeah. "With the

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 86 1 controller." Yeah, that's good. Thank you. 2 MR. EISNER: Anything else? 3 MR. SMITH: Could you make that a bullet? 4 Could you say three options? 5 MS. ARMSTRONG: Sure. 6 MALE SPEAKER: Make it a bullet? 7 MR. SMITH: Make it a third option. 8 MS. ARMSTRONG: Make it a sub. 9 MALE SPEAKER: Okay. I'm sorry. 10 MS. ARMSTRONG: It's a sub bullet. Just 11 match it up to machines. 12 MR. EISNER: Okay. It's currently on the 13 screen again. Does anybody object? Does anybody 14 still abstain? Two abstentions. Okay. I think we're 15 ready to move on to the next slide. 16 MS. BARHYDT: UV lights. Customers may 17 specify ultraviolet lights to use to neutralize 18 pathogens in the case. DOE proposes to issue guidance 19 that UV lights do not need to be turned on for the 20 test. 21 MR. BAUMAN: This is Jeff Bauman from 22 National. That's fine.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 87 1 MR. EISNER: Any other comments? Any 2 objections? Any abstentions? Okay. Let's go to the 3 next one. 4 MS. BARHYDT: Illuminated temperature 5 displays and alarms. Illuminated displays provide 6 visual information on case temperature. Alarms notify 7 operators if case temperature falls out of the 8 specified range. These features should be enabled 9 during the test. 10 MR. EISNER: Comments? Any objections? Any 11 abstentions? 12 All right. Next issue. 13 MS. BARHYDT: Condenser flour filters. 14 They're nonpermanent filters on condensers that 15 prevent particulates, such as flour, from blocking the 16 condenser coil and reducing airflow. DOE suggests 17 issuing guidance to indicate that filters should be 18 removed during testing. And this is removal of the 19 flour filters, not removal of all filters. 20 MR. EISNER: Any comments? Questions? Does 21 anybody object? Anybody abstain? 22 MR. HON: Charlie Hon. I have --

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 88 1 MR. EISNER: Charlie? 2 MR. HON: -- a question. Why do we put the 3 word "flour" in the heading? Because you're assuming 4 that that filter is a flour filter. It's just a 5 filter. 6 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah. 7 MS. BARHYDT: We have "such as flour." 8 FEMALE SPEAKER: Yeah, we have "such as 9 flour." If -- basically -- 10 MR. HON: Okay. "Such as flour" doesn't 11 bother me at all. 12 FEMALE SPEAKER: Right, so -- 13 MALE SPEAKER: It's just that heading. 14 FEMALE SPEAKER: It's just the heading, so 15 MS. ARMSTRONG: Well, the position too, 16 yeah. 17 FEMALE SPEAKER: Okay. 18 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah. 19 MR. EISNER: Any other questions? Any 20 objections? Any abstentions? Okay. Refrigeration 21 system. 22 MS. BARHYDT: Refrigeration system security

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 89 1 covers. These are straps or other devices used to 2 secure the condensing unit sled. DOE suggests issuing 3 guidance to indicate that refrigeration system 4 security covers should be removed for testing. 5 MR. EISNER: Comments? 6 MR. BAUMAN: This is Jeff Bauman from 7 National. Can we remove the word "sled"? Some -- 8 MS. ARMSTRONG: Sure. 9 MR. EISNER: Anything else? Any objections? 10 Any abstentions? Okay. Night curtains/covers. 11 MS. BARHYDT: Night curtains and covers. 12 Night curtains or covers can be pulled down over a 13 case to reduce infiltration and energy consumption 14 during periods when shoppers are not present. This is 15 fully addressed by the test procedures currently 16 written. DOE does not believe any guidance or 17 clarification is needed. 18 MR. EISNER: Questions? Comments? 19 MS. ARMSTRONG: Voting? 20 MR. SACHS: I have no vote. 21 MS. BARHYDT: It's already in the test 22 procedures.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 90 1 MS. ARMSTRONG: It is what it is. 2 MR. EISNER: Just making sure it is. Okay. 3 MS. BARHYDT: Grille options. Special 4 grilles are used to direct airflow in unique 5 applications, such as up and away from a rear wall. 6 DOE will issue guidance that, if present, nonstandard 7 grilles would be removed for testing. 8 MR. EISNER: Objections, questions, 9 concerns? Any objections? Any abstentions? Next 10 issue is coated coils. 11 MS. BARHYDT: Coated coils. Coatings may be 12 added to coils to provide protection from harsh 13 environments, such as where oxidizers or acids are 14 present. All types of coils are eligible for testing. 15 MR. EISNER: Questions, comments? 16 MR. HON: Charlie Hon. I just wanted to 17 clarify that this means that -- put the coil in and 18 test it as it sits, and that's what it is? 19 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yep. 20 MS. BARHYDT: Ashley said yes. 21 MR. HON: Okay. Thank you. 22 MR. EISNER: Anything else? Any objections?

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 91 1 MR. THARP: This is Rusty Tharp with 2 Goodman. Just clarifying that all these are presently 3 CRE accessories; correct? 4 MS. BARHYDT: Yeah, the CRE is up at the 5 top. 6 MR. THARP: Okay. Thank you. 7 MS. ARMSTRONG: Are you anticipating what's 8 coming for -- are you getting ready? 9 MR. CYMBALSKY: Do a copy/paste on that. 10 MR. EISNER: Okay. Any objections? Any 11 abstentions? Okay. Internal secondary coolant 12 circuits. 13 MS. BARHYDT: Internal secondary coolant 14 circuits, it's a design featuring an internal circuit 15 containing a secondary working fluid which is cooled 16 by expansion of refrigerant from a remote condensing 17 unit. The test -- existing test procedure provides a 18 method of tests for these, so DOE doesn't see any need 19 for additional guidance. 20 MR. EISNER: Anybody disagree with that? 21 Okay. Next issue. 22 MR. SACHS: Whoa, whoa. You caught me as I

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 92 1 was hitting my button. I think it may be more 2 inclusive to just say "is cooled by a remote 3 condensing unit," because this may conceivably be an 4 absorption unit in some cases. 5 MS. ARMSTRONG: That's fine. I mean, our 6 position -- we -- so this resulted from the day we had 7 the CRE working group separate thing, and somebody 8 just had a question about how something was tested, 9 and we clarified it pretty -- so I don't expect you to 10 see this in any reg text or anything. 11 MR. SACHS: Thank you. 12 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah. 13 MR. EISNER: Okay. Wedge cases? 14 MS. BARHYDT: Wedge cases are cases that fit 15 between two other cases to fill a gap, such as a 16 corner, in a continuous case lineup. They may require 17 air spillover from adjacent cases to meet design 18 temperatures. The current test procedure requires 19 that the wedge case must be tested and must meet the 20 standards individually. If the test procedure is not 21 representative of the energy use of the wedge case, 22 manufacturers should seek a test procedure waiver

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 93 1 under our existing waiver regulations. 2 MR. EISNER: Any questions, comments? 3 MR. SHEBIK: Yes. This is Ron Shebik with 4 Hussmann. The question I have for Laura is I spoke to 5 some other manufacturers who were involved with the 6 DOE -- I guess the decision-making through Navigant 7 before I was involved with it with this topic, and 8 from speaking to some other manufacturers, I was given 9 the impression, or basically -- or they had the 10 impression that Navigant understood that wedge cases 11 must be tested with a parent case and could not be 12 tested by themselves, could not be tested 13 individually. 14 MS. ARMSTRONG: So that's not the 15 Department's position. We've articulated our 16 position. And I'm pretty sure that's not Navigant's 17 position. 18 MALE SPEAKER: We're not allowed to have -- 19 MS. ARMSTRONG: Speaking from a -- 20 MR. SHEBIK: The problem is if the DOE were 21 to order a wedge case and try to run a test, it's not 22 going to work, not without the parent cases attached

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 94 1 to it. 2 MS. ARMSTRONG: Then you should have a test 3 procedure waiver, period. I mean, it's going to work. 4 It's just not going to meet the standard. 5 MR. SHEBIK: It's not going to meet the 6 standard, correct. 7 MS. ARMSTRONG: Correct. 8 MR. SHEBIK: You're not going to be able to 9 get the temperatures that you need to get in order to 10 run the test. 11 MS. ARMSTRONG: So you need to have a test 12 procedure waiver. 13 MR. SHEBIK: Okay. Thank you. 14 MS. ARMSTRONG: And it can be -- you can 15 work with them if you want to come up with a common 16 test procedure waiver, but each manufacturer will have 17 to apply individually, but they can use a common 18 methodology. 19 MR. SHEBIK: Okay. 20 MR. AMRANE: Karim Amrane. I think that's 21 maybe what we'll have to do, but at the same time, you 22 need to realize that when DOE did the rulemaking,

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 95 1 whatever DOE did, whatever Navigant did, they used 2 energy (inaudible) that really can only work if they 3 are attached to something else. So we will do that, 4 but (inaudible) should realize that's how the rule was 5 established. 6 MS. ARMSTRONG: I understand. And what 7 we're trying to tell you is that this is what our regs 8 require right now, and we're -- this is the way we 9 work with you to get to the position that you need to 10 be in. 11 MR. EISNER: Any other concerns? Nobody 12 objects to the fact that there is no vote needed here? 13 Okay. Next issue. 14 MS. BARHYDT: Misting systems. Misting 15 systems dispense a water mist, which is used to 16 maintain quality of products, such as fresh produce. 17 DOE will issue guidance indicating that misting 18 systems should be inactive during test. 19 MR. EISNER: Comments? Any objections? Any 20 abstentions? 21 MALE SPEAKER: Looks like we've got -- 22 MR. NESHAN: One comment. I understand

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 96 1 misting system, but some people refer to it as also 2 humidification system. Should that be part of it; 3 misting, slash, humidification system? 4 FEMALE SPEAKER: It's the same thing. 5 MS. ARMSTRONG: They're external sprayers. 6 MS. BARHYDT: So humidification, it's an 7 external sprayer, same sort of -- 8 MR. NESHAN: Well, it -- 9 MS. BARHYDT: -- functionality. 10 MR. NESHAN: There's a setting, like the 11 misting system that you're referring, like in the 12 produce display case. 13 MS. BARHYDT: Uh-huh. 14 MR. NESHAN: In the seafood case, they 15 wouldn't do that. They would refer to it as a 16 humidification system. They don't call it misting 17 because they don't want water particles to drop on the 18 fish. So it's a different description. 19 MS. ARMSTRONG: Okay. 20 MR. EISNER: Any other comments? Any 21 objections? Any abstentions? 22 Next issue, air purifiers?

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 97 1 MS. BARHYDT: Air purifiers remove 2 contaminants from recirculated case air. DOE will 3 issue guidance indicating that air purifiers should 4 not be active during test. 5 MR. EISNER: Any comments? Any objections? 6 Any abstentions? Okay. Next issue, general-purpose 7 outlets. 8 MS. BARHYDT: Some cases contain additional 9 electrical outlets, which can be used to power 10 additional equipment, such as scales or slicers. DOE 11 will issue guidance indicating that general-purpose 12 outlets should not be energized during test. However, 13 any losses from added components due to the presence 14 of a general-purpose outlet would be counted. 15 MR. EISNER: Any concerns? 16 MS. BARHYDT: That doesn't read right. 17 MS. ARMSTRONG: Well, this clarifies your 18 question, or I attempted to clarify it this morning in 19 my sleepy state. So it may not read correctly for the 20 purposes of what we want to put in rule language, but 21 I think you might better understand the intent now. 22 MR. WHITWELL: Yeah, thanks. That's good

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 98 1 clarification. I was going to raise a question on 2 this one. So this means that if this is a 230 volt -- 3 if the equipment's 230 volt and it has 115 volt 4 general- purpose outlet with a transformer in there, 5 then the transformer power would be included in the 6 test, right? Okay. I understand. 7 MR. BAUMAN: This is Jeff Bauman from 8 National, just suggesting we -- instead of saying the 9 outlet would not be energized, that there would be no 10 load connected to it, so you're -- 11 MS. ARMSTRONG: Better? That's better. 12 MR. EISNER: Yeah, good. 13 MS. ARMSTRONG: After that, that no load be 14 connected to the general-purpose outlet. Go up to the 15 other one. There you go. Thank you. 16 MR. EISNER: Okay. Other comments? Any 17 objections to this? Any abstentions? Okay. Next 18 issue. 19 MS. BARHYDT: Crankcase heaters. These 20 heaters keep the compressor warm in order to maintain 21 the refrigerant inside at optimal conditions when 22 operating at low ambient temperatures. Should be

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 99 1 active during test. If they have a control system, it 2 should be used. 3 MR. EISNER: Comments? Any objections? 4 Harvey? 5 MR. SACHS: This is Harvey, and I guess I'm 6 just a little confused. Almost all CRE is designed 7 for indoor placement, as I understand it. So what 8 applications are using crankcase heaters? 9 MR. HON: This is Charlie Hon. Harvey, it 10 is rare, but it does happen. We do make outside 11 units. They're usually in fairly warm environments 12 outside, but it does happen, but it is very rare, but 13 they use a very, very rudimentary controller system. 14 So I think that we may want to consider putting in 15 there "set to activate below 50 degrees Fahrenheit" or 16 something, because I don't want somebody to come in 17 and say, "Well, it needs to be on below 70 -- below 80 18 degrees Fahrenheit." It just doesn't work. 19 MS. ARMSTRONG: That wouldn't be a test. 20 MR. HON: Yeah, but during the test, it'll 21 never happen. 22 MS. BARHYDT: Right. But so it should have

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 100 1 whatever control scheme it normally has. 2 MR. HON: Well, those are usually manually 3 adjustable, and we don't know what they're going to be 4 set at. 5 MR. BAUMAN: This is Jeff Bauman from 6 National. I think, again, we're getting into the 7 wording, you know, operational during the test as 8 opposed to -- it doesn't have to be energized or 9 rolling or whatever. It just has to be operational if 10 it has a control system it would utilize. 11 MR. HON: Right. 12 MS. ARMSTRONG: If it doesn't -- 13 MR. HON: That would be absolutely correct. 14 MR. BAUMAN: Sorry? 15 MS. ARMSTRONG: If it doesn't have a control 16 system -- 17 MR. BAUMAN: If it has a -- I'm sorry. Did 18 I say it wrong? 19 MS. ARMSTRONG: If -- no, I'm asking. What 20 is the position if it does not? 21 MR. BAUMAN: And it's going to be on in the 22 75 -- then it would be on. You might not need, but

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 101 1 your -- again, a product -- 2 MS. ARMSTRONG: How would you know, if it's 3 just on or off? 4 MR. BAUMAN: How would you know if it's on 5 or off? 6 MS. ARMSTRONG: No, no, no. I mean, if -- 7 so say it doesn't -- and I don't know -- maybe I 8 missed -- so -- 9 MR. BAUMAN: Again, I think -- I don't want 10 to get -- not to interrupt, but if these are -- again, 11 with Charlie, these are very oddball cases. I mean, 12 you have somebody in Minnesota that wants a -- to put 13 their refrigerator outside in their garage for the 14 winter, and they run it all year round, so you might 15 actually need that crankcase heater for the cold 16 weather times, and you would have, you know, a control 17 system, basically, so you're not running that heat, 18 obviously, all year round, but if it doesn't -- if you 19 didn't -- for some reason if you did it and you had it 20 running all the time, it didn't have -- which would be 21 odd. 22 MS. ARMSTRONG: It would just be on.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 102 1 MR. BAUMAN: You know, most cases, it would 2 have a control. 3 MS. ARMSTRONG: Okay. 4 MR. BAUMAN: Otherwise you'll overheat the 5 compressor. 6 MS. ARMSTRONG: Okay. 7 MR. EISNER: Other comments? Any objections 8 to this language? Any abstentions? 9 Okay. Next issue. 10 MS. BARHYDT: Added or varied liner 11 material may be added to the inside and/or outside of 12 the case. The thermal impact of any type of liner 13 would be captured by the current DOE test procedures, 14 so we don't believe any further guidance is necessary. 15 MR. EISNER: Anybody object to that 16 approach? 17 MR. HON: This is Charlie Hon. That would 18 effectively create a new base model, wouldn't it? 19 MS. ARMSTRONG: It could. It wouldn't have 20 to. You could group it with the least efficient one, 21 but, yeah. 22 MR. HON: Right. Okay.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 103 1 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah. 2 MR. HON: So you could create a new base 3 model? 4 MS. ARMSTRONG: Absolutely. 5 MR. EISNER: Next issue? 6 MS. ARMSTRONG: So CRE, we're done. 7 MR. NESHAN: There was something missing. 8 MS. ARMSTRONG: We were done. 9 MR. NESHAN: This is Neshan. If you recall 10 at the last meeting we had, we discussed a crankcase 11 pressure regulator to be off the list? 12 MS. ARMSTRONG: Do you want to explain what 13 it is? Because none of us have a recollection of 14 that. 15 MR. NESHAN: Okay. It's a mechanical device 16 that has been installed on a condensing unit for 17 pressure in areas that the power companies cannot 18 provide quality power. The voltage drops, and they 19 have to -- we have to put this device to force the 20 higher pressure. The compressor has to work under 21 higher pressure in order to compensate for the poor 22 quality of power. And we see that quite in Florida.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 104 1 The customers ask us to push this device. I think we 2 discussed this last time. 3 MR. HON: This is Charlie Hon. That's a 4 problematic issue because the test procedure itself 5 specifies a voltage, so you can't vary the voltage. 6 It's simulating, I mean, near what the objective of 7 the product is, is to deal with the low voltages. 8 MS. BARHYDT: How does this come up under 9 the test conditions, or what is 10 MR. NESHAN: As I said, so mechanically11 wise, installed as part of the condensing unit. So 12 artificially, we add pressure, and the compressor has 13 to work at a higher pressure, which means it has to 14 work harder so that if there's a low voltage 15 condition, when the compressor wants to come on, 16 conditions are correct for that compressor to come on. 17 Otherwise, the compressor would burn out. 18 MS. ARMSTRONG: I don't see why it's an 19 issue. 20 MR. BAUMAN: This is Jeff Bauman from 21 National. We would test with the CPR in the system. 22 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 105 1 MR. BAUMAN: And under the test conditions, 2 if it was building a pressure, we'd amend that we 3 would just test with that as part of the normal unit. 4 MS. ARMSTRONG: Right. I don't see why it 5 would be an issue. 6 MR. EISNER: Any other comment on this 7 issue? 8 MS. BARHYDT: Do we need to add it -- 9 MR. HON: This is Charlie Hon. 10 MS. BARHYDT: -- and explicitly state that 11 we don't believe that there's any change needed? Go 12 ahead, Charlie. 13 MR. HON: This is Charlie Hon. I -- these 14 things are very, very unusual, and they're only used 15 in conditions where the unit specification cannot be 16 met, usually at -- quite often at export units, but 17 sometimes in rural areas, where the voltage varies a 18 great deal. This is not anything that's trying to do 19 anything other than compensate for the fact that the 20 electrical utility's not meeting their requirements -- 21 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah. 22 MR. HON: -- and really should not be

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 106 1 affecting energy efficiency because under proper 2 conditions during the test procedure, we would never 3 see this necessary. In reality, it would obscure your 4 test because it would run your pressures much higher 5 than it needed to be and falsely just -- and really 6 actually damage -- I don't believe we should be 7 testing these things as part of the unit at all. 8 MS. BARHYDT: Can it be removed by the test 9 lab? 10 MR. NESHAN: I assume mechanically-wise, it 11 could be removed, but they have to go do some piping. 12 MS. ARMSTRONG: No. 13 MR. BAUMAN: I think -- this is Jeff Bauman 14 from National again -- but I think the question would 15 be, again, you know, we don't have a problem with this 16 one with the other, but that I think the people asking 17 for an exclusion on it would be if you have a similar 18 unit that does not have this feature, then you would 19 test that, not let the lab remove it, I think. 20 MS. ARMSTRONG: So I guess just for my lack 21 of understanding, if a unit includes this device, it 22 automatically is on, regardless of the voltage it's

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 107 1 receiving? 2 MR. NESHAN: Yes, mechanically-wise. Again, 3 it's -- 4 MS. ARMSTRONG: So it's on or off? It's not 5 a -- if it receives a bad voltage, it comes on, 6 period? 7 MR. NESHAN: No, no, it's always on. It 8 would be always on. 9 MS. ARMSTRONG: Right, so 10 MR. NESHAN: It's a restriction in the 11 piping. 12 MS. ARMSTRONG: Right. So just test one 13 without it, then. So and you offer the exact same 14 unit without it? 15 MR. NESHAN: Oh, yes. Oh, yes. 16 MS. ARMSTRONG: All right. So add it. 17 MS. BARHYDT: What's it called? 18 MALE SPEAKER: A regulator. 19 MS. ARMSTRONG: Voltage regulator? 20 MALE SPEAKER: Crankcase pressure regulator. 21 MS. ARMSTRONG: Crankcase pressure 22 regulator.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 108 1 2 3 MS. BARHYDT: Can you give us the 4 description? 5 MALE SPEAKER: Neshan, you want to just give 6 a description of what its function is? 7 MR. NESHAN: It's a mechanical pressure 8 regulator designed or used for low-voltage conditions. 9 I mean, that's -- if you want, I can write up 10 something and send it over. 11 MALE SPEAKER: Under-voltage? 12 MR. NESHAN: It's under-voltage, yes. 13 MALE SPEAKER: Under-voltage? 14 MR. NESHAN: Under-voltage, yeah. 15 MS. ARMSTRONG: All right. Just put "have 16 identical model available without feature for 17 testing." 18 MR. NESHAN: Yeah. 19 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah, that's good. 20 MR. EISNER: Okay. Joe Sanders online, you 21 have a comment? 22 MR. SANDERS: I was -- yes, this is Joe --

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 109 1 can you hear me -- from Traulsen? 2 MR. EISNER: Yes. Yes. 3 MR. SANDERS: I was going to give you a 4 better explanation of that a CPR valve is. It goes in 5 the suction between the evaporator coil and the 6 compressor, and it is designed to lower the suction 7 pressure that the compressor sees so that the 8 compressor is able to start and run, and it can be 9 used under low-voltage situations, which is true. 10 It's always present in the system. It does 11 have a pressure drop across it, and it does cause the 12 compressor or the refrigeration system to operate at a 13 lower efficiency level. If you look at the compressor 14 curves, whenever the suction pressure is lower, they 15 use more energy to attain the same BTU rating. 16 I'm lost here. So anyway, it's always in 17 the system. It's for low-voltage or hard-to-start 18 applications. It does cause lower efficiency levels. 19 And it's something that needs to be accounted for. 20 MS. BARHYDT: Okay. So DOE is suggesting 21 that if you have an identical model without this 22 feature, that is the version of the product that would

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 110 1 be tested, and we have all of that information you 2 just provided in the record, so we'll use that to fill 3 in the description rather than having Jeremy try and 4 type it all in right now. 5 MR. SANDERS: I understand. Just before I 6 hang up, is everything -- are there any questions on 7 this valve or feature? 8 MR. EISNER: Nobody has any questions. 9 MR. SANDERS: Okay. Thanks for letting me 10 talk. 11 MR. EISNER: You're welcome. Okay. We'll 12 be adding a definition with that. Is everybody okay 13 with this? Any objections? Any abstentions? Okay. 14 MS. BARHYDT: Okay. PTACs. A basic model 15 means all systems of a given type of covered product 16 or class thereof manufactured by one manufacturer, 17 having the same primary energy source, electric or 18 gas, and which have the same or comparable 19 compressors, same or comparable condensing coils, same 20 or comparable evaporator coils, and same or comparable 21 air-moving systems that have a cooling capacity within 22 300 BTU per hour of one another.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 111 1 MR. EISNER: Any comments? Any questions? 2 Any objections to this? Harvey? 3 MR. SACHS: Do we need the term "or gas" in 4 there? 5 MS. BARHYDT: Are there no gas? 6 MALE SPEAKER: You don't have a gas-fired -- 7 MS. ARMSTRONG: There is no gas. 8 MALE SPEAKER: Yeah, there are gas-fired 9 PTACs. 10 MR. EISNER: Pardon me? I'm all in favor of 11 innovation. 12 MR. JOHNSON: There used to be gas-fired 13 PTACs, and I think there still are and may be again. 14 I think Kozi (ph) makes a gas-fired heating section. 15 MR. SACHS: Thank you. 16 MR. EISNER: Okay. 17 MR. WHITWELL: Bob Whitwell, Carrier. Just 18 to clean it up a bit, do we need to have the phrase 19 "all systems of a given type of covered product or 20 class thereof," can we just replace that with PTAC or 21 packaged terminal heat pumps because that's what we're 22 talking about?

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 112 1 MR. EISNER: I would point out that lawyers 2 don't like the word "thereof." 3 MS. ARMSTRONG: Our lawyers don't. 4 FEMALE SPEAKER: Being a lawyer -- 5 MS. ARMSTRONG: DOE lawyers don't. 6 MR. EISNER: Okay. Let me have their names. 7 I'll talk to them. 8 FEMALE SPEAKER: Did you point at me? 9 MS. ARMSTRONG: Uh-uh. 10 MALE SPEAKER: You're on vacation right now. 11 MALE SPEAKER: Are we making a change? 12 MS. ARMSTRONG: So in the existing 13 regulations, that's meant to be they have to belong to 14 the same product class. 15 MR. WHITWELL: But I think -- 16 MS. ARMSTRONG: That's what -- that's -- 17 MR. WHITWELL: This is a definition -- 18 MS. ARMSTRONG: Translation from our 19 lawyerly language, or that's what that means. 20 MR. WHITWELL: Okay. But by definition, 21 wouldn't PTAC and packaged terminal heat pumps be part 22 of the same product class?

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 113 1 MS. ARMSTRONG: So the PTAC product classes 2 are distinguished more, in some cases, by cooling 3 capacity, by their rated cooling capacity. 4 MR. WHITWELL: Okay. 5 MS. ARMSTRONG: That's the issue. 6 MR. WHITWELL: Okay. I'm fine with it. 7 MS. ARMSTRONG: But we can say it in a much 8 more direct way. 9 MR. SACHS: This is Harvey. For 10 consistency, if you're going to include the 11 possibility of gas, we've got to add some other 12 language about components, because there's a furnace 13 section that would be involved, unless it was a gas 14 heat pump. 15 MS. HOOTMAN: Harvey, this is Jill. Why 16 would we add it to a cooling test in a cooling 17 description? 18 MR. SACHS: Again, if it were a gas heat 19 pump, it would be doing gas heat pump PTAC, you would 20 need to include it. 21 MS. HOOTMAN: I don't -- I was thinking that 22 the ones -- that gas furnaces were heating.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 114 1 MR. THARP: Yeah. Rusty with Goodman. 2 MS. HOOTMAN: Gas furnaces for heating. 3 MR. THARP: The gas portion is actually the 4 gas heating. I don't think there's any kind of gas -- 5 MR. SACHS: So it would be relevant for the 6 PTHP, but in that case -- 7 MR. STEM: This is Mike with Intertek. 8 There are some technologies, primarily in Asia, but 9 it's gas- powered compressors that are still doing 10 cooling, so I wouldn't exclude those. 11 MR. SACHS: I'm only saying if we're 12 including gas, there's downstream language which I 13 think needs to be modulated, and I'm not sure what the 14 words are. 15 MS. HOOTMAN: Admittedly not exhaustive, but 16 right now on a Google search, all I'm finding is gas 17 furnace sections, no gas engines or compressors. But, 18 admittedly, it's just a short search. 19 MR. SACHS: That's just what I want at my 20 Motel 6. 21 MR. EISNER: All right. Moving right along 22 -- so are we comfortable with this language as-is?

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 115 1 Any objections to this? Any abstentions? 2 MS. BARHYDT: PTAC features. Copper 3 evaporator condenser coils. It's an indoor or outdoor 4 coil used in an air conditioner and fabricated 5 entirely of copper. DOE believes that all types of 6 coils should be eligible for testing. 7 MR. EISNER: Any comments? Anybody object? 8 Anybody abstain? The next issue? 9 MS. BARHYDT: Coated coils. An indoor coil 10 or outdoor coil whose entire surface, including the 11 entire surface of both fins and tubes, is covered with 12 a thin continuous nonporous coating to reduce 13 corrosion. DOE believes that all types of coils are 14 eligible for testing. 15 MR. EISNER: Any comments? 16 MR. AMRANE: Karim Amrane. You guys, we're 17 going to have the same discussion later on for the 18 other product, so if you're going to make a different 19 determination for the other project, then I think we 20 should discuss this all together, because we're not 21 going to agree to something here and then do something 22 differently.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 116 1 MS. BARHYDT: Why? 2 MR. AMRANE: Well, because -- for the same 3 reasons. I mean, we are talking about the same kind 4 of issues. The coated coal is needed because of 5 corrosion issues, and if you're making different 6 determination later on for the other products, then I 7 don't see why it won't apply for this type of product, 8 too. 9 MS. ARMSTRONG: Well, so far we've done CRE, 10 and we've voted on CRE to not -- that all types of 11 coils will be eligible for testing. So for PTACs, our 12 position is that all types of coils should also be 13 available for testing. 14 One of the reasons is I think there is a 15 difference between the PTAC market and all the 16 different designs and features and the one-offs and 17 the two-offs. You don't see that as much in the 18 commercial HVAC -- as in the commercial HVAC industry. 19 So I would encourage you to be open to the idea of 20 treating them differently. 21 MR. SACHS: This is Harvey. Karim, I've had 22 the impression that a much higher fraction of PTACs

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 117 1 are installed in environments near salt air -- that 2 would be the case, for example, for RTUs, and it's 3 just such a pervasive aspect of the hospitality 4 industry. So that in itself, there's a higher 5 fraction of PTACs that are shipped with coated coils 6 for that reason. That would seem to be a reason why 7 this class might be treated differently. 8 MR. AMRANE: Let the manufacturers speak, 9 but at the same time, maybe the solution is to do what 10 we - - in that case we left it last time, is maybe 11 look at establishing a different product class or 12 whatever. I don't know. 13 MS. ARMSTRONG: That would be a long-term 14 solution for the next rulemaking, but for now, the 15 short-term solution would -- the position up for 16 voting is that all types of coils would be eligible 17 for testing. 18 MR. THARP: Rusty Tharp with Goodman. As 19 far as the market share issue, I don't have an exact 20 figure, but it's probably somewhere between 10 and 20 21 percent of our PTACs are shipped with a coating on the 22 condenser coal. And I guess our position is that we

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 118 1 would prefer for it not to be tested because it's a 2 fairly minimal degradation in performance based on our 3 testing. It's 1 or 2 percent, somewhere in that 4 range. But the long-term effect is, after a year -- 5 being in the field for a year or so, the performance 6 of that product is much better, then, without the 7 coating on the coil. 8 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah, and I think, from the 9 Department's perspective, there's no -- I mean, we see 10 benefit of these, period. And, Karim, your answer to 11 -- you know, product class, long-term, maybe that's 12 the way they need to be evaluated. For short-term, 13 you know, for coated coils, for a 1 to 2 percent 14 difference, if you guys decide to group them as the 15 same base model, the key here would be any type of 16 coil could be selected for testing. 17 MR. EISNER: Further comment? Any 18 objections to this? Any abstentions? Okay. Is that 19 an abstention? Okay. No abstentions. 20 Okay. Next issue? 21 MS. BARHYDT: High-efficiency air 22 filtration. An assembly of air filters and filter

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 119 1 brackets or racks that provides greater air filtration 2 than the air filtration assembly available for sale 3 with the equipment that provides the lowest air 4 filtration. 5 Short-term solution is to issue test 6 procedure guidance specifying standard air filter for 7 tests; long-term will be to actually address this in 8 the DOE test procedure. 9 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah. And, Rusty, can -- or 10 can one of you remind me what was the standard filter 11 rating for this one, for PTACs? I -- 12 MR. JOHNSON: It was like -- this is Tom 13 Johnson. It was like a MERV 3. 14 MS. ARMSTRONG: Okay, yeah. Can you put in 15 MERV 3 under short-term in parentheses? 16 MR. JOHNSON: But -- yeah, but we were 17 talking about -- Ashley, we were talking about 18 pressure drop instead of MERV 3, because it's not 19 consistently a MERV 20 3. 21 MALE SPEAKER: Yes. 22 MR. WHITWELL: And a MERV is not a pressure

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 120 1 drop value. 2 MS. ARMSTRONG: Oh, I got that part. But 3 what do you want? 4 MR. WHITWELL: The point of discussion was a 5 pressure drop. 6 MR. THARP: For most PTAC product, it's a 7 custom filter that, you know, it's a plastic, mesh 8 filter that goes -- slides in and slides out, so it's 9 typically not -- 10 MS. ARMSTRONG: Right. It can be cleaned. 11 MR. THARP: That can be cleaned, right. 12 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah. 13 MR. THARP: Cleanable. So a MERV rating is 14 not appropriate. Our suggestion is to test with 15 whatever is shipped with the product, and -- because 16 100 percent of our product is shipped with a filter -- 17 MS. ARMSTRONG: So can -- 18 MR. THARP: -- for both our vision and -- 19 MS. ARMSTRONG: Can you just change it to 20 "test as shipped"? 21 MR. THARP: I would say "test whatever is" - 22

-

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 121 1 MS. ARMSTRONG: Standard air filter. 2 MR. THARP: Standard -- standard -- 3 MS. ARMSTRONG: Or specifying test as 4 shipped with air filter as -- 5 MR. THARP: And if it's not shipped, we're 6 going past not shipped. 7 MR. AMRANE: This is Karim. May be the 8 question for Rusty -- I mean, do we have any pressure 9 drop in test procedures and stuff? 10 MR. THARP: Not for this one. 11 MR. AMRANE: Not for this one? 12 MR. THARP: And the air-moving systems on 13 PTACs are fairly sensitive to pressure drop. 14 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah. 15 MR. THARP: So it's -- if you put a -- even 16 a small pressure delta, it's going to have a pretty 17 significant difference on the air-movement system, so 18 the products are designed to typically remain with the 19 low pressure drop, plastic mesh filter, and that's the 20 way we test them in our labs. And in a trial, the 21 labs receive the standard plastic mesh filters. 22 MR. SACHS: This is Harvey. What I'm

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 122 1 hearing is that you're shipping with (inaudible) 2 obstacles, which we call filters. I can appreciate 3 that as being a customer-driven and I can appreciate 4 pressure drop sensitivity. But I think, as protection 5 for the industry, it still would be worthwhile to 6 define a pressure drop, whether that's .1 inches or 7 some other number, or whether it's capacity dependent. 8 It still would seem to protect you all against those - 9 - some arbitrary decision that the test procedure 10 ought to require a MERV 11 filter, and nobody makes a 11 MERV 11 filter with a .1 pressure drop. I think it 12 might be useful to get that performance spec in there. 13 MR. THARP: Rusty Tharp, Goodman. I think 14 in our -- because of the space constraints, you could 15 not even get a one-inch filter on our product. 16 MALE SPEAKER: I understand that. 17 MR. THARP: So it has -- it's basically -- 18 it's only the customer filter that's designed with the 19 product, at least today's production. I can only 20 speak for my company -- 21 MR. SACHS: So, Rusty, what you're telling 22 me is you've accomplished two objectives. You've got

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 123 1 a filter in there that's coarse enough that it never 2 gets dirty enough to be cleaned. Now all the dirt -- 3 MR. WHITWELL: And that -- 4 MR. SACHS: -- can go directly to the 5 evaporator. 6 MR. WHITWELL: No, actually -- we're not in 7 the PTAC business anymore, but the filters in there do 8 a fairly decent job of catching dust; right? It 9 catches dust that is typically in a hotel or motel, 10 and they do need to be cleaned, or else the unit's not 11 going to perform. So they do catch a lot of dust. 12 MR. THARP: We do have great filters. 13 MR. SACHS: I'm sorry. I missed that. 14 MR. THARP: Rusty with Goodman. We do have 15 great filters. 16 MR. SACHS: Great? 17 MR. THARP: Great. 18 MR. SACHS: Great or gray? 19 MALE SPEAKER: Gray. I think he said gray. 20 Gray filters. 21 MR. EISNER: Okay. Anything else on this? 22 Any objections to the language? Any abstentions?

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 124 1 Okay. 2 MS. BARHYDT: Normal wall sleeve depth is 14 3 inches. Extended wall sleeves can range from 16 to 31 4 inches. DOE would issue test procedure guidance 5 indicating that units will be tested with standardized 6 14-inch sleeves. 7 MR. EISNER: Any comments? Any objections 8 to the language? Any abstentions? 9 Decorative grilles. 10 MS. BARHYDT: A decorative grille is a 11 nonstandard grille used primarily for aesthetic 12 purposes. Issue test procedure guidance indicating 13 that units will be tested without decorative grilles. 14 MR. EISNER: Any comments? 15 MR. WHITWELL: Yeah. This is Bob Whitwell 16 from Carrier. Rusty, I would be concerned about this, 17 because I think you need to have at least your 18 standard grille there. If you have -- this implies 19 that you would remove the grille altogether. 20 MR. JOHNSON: Right. Tom Johnson. 21 MR. WHITWELL: And -- 22 MR. JOHNSON: I agree with that.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 125 1 MR. WHITWELL: -- then you have the air 2 coming in and out of the same side, so you need the 3 grille to do the deflection of the air to reduce the - 4

- 5 MS. HOOTMAN: Bypass. 6 MR. WHITWELL: Bypass -- recirculate -- 7 MR. THARP: Maybe we ought to say 8 architectural decorative grilles. That terminology is 9 used, I think, quite a bit in sales literature. 10 MR. EISNER: What? 11 MR. THARP: So architectural decorative 12 grilles. 13 MR. EISNER: Yeah. 14 MR. JOHNSON: Well, but for the most part, 15 they all come with grilles, just like the filters. 16 MR. THARP: But it's not in the 17 architectural -- 18 MR. JOHNSON: Yeah, it's -- 19 MR. THARP: -- or decorative. 20 MR. JOHNSON: I mean, whatever your standard 21 grille is, that's what you want to test around. 22 MR. EISNER: So they will be tested.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 126 1 MS. ARMSTRONG: So our position should be 2 that we will test with standard grilles, period. 3 Okay. 4 MR. WHITWELL: Yeah, I think that makes 5 sense. 6 MS. ARMSTRONG: We'll just say "with 7 standard grilles" -- 8 MALE SPEAKER: Yeah. 9 MS. ARMSTRONG: -- instead of "without 10 decorative." Yep. 11 MR. EISNER: Any objections to this 12 language? Any abstentions? Okay. Next issue. Should 13 we -- 14 MALE SPEAKER: Yeah. 15 MR. EISNER: -- take a lunch -- 16 MR. CYMBALSKY: The grill sounds good to me, 17 so I think we're going to 18 MALE SPEAKER: Trigger word, huh? 19 MR. EISNER: Take an hour for lunch? 20 (Whereupon, a recess was taken.) 21 MR. EISNER: Okay. And away we go. 22 MS. BARHYDT: Okay. Basic model definition.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 127 1 Air-cooled, small, large, very large commercial 2 packaged air conditioning. Basic model means all 3 systems of a given type of covered product or class 4 thereof having the same primary energy source, 5 electric or gas, and which have the same or comparably 6 performing compressors, condensing coils -- there's 7 too many s's there -- evaporator coils, and air-moving 8 systems that have a common nominal cooling capacity. 9 MR. EISNER: Any comments, questions? No 10 objections? Harvey? 11 MR. SACHS: I guess I'm just a little -- 12 Harvey Sachs -- a little confused about the heating 13 side of this since so much of this market is served 14 with what we have called a commercial warm-air furnace 15 as a section of the air conditioner. 16 And so we're, again, in the situation of 17 electricity or gas, but not explicitly addressing the 18 components that would be involved and functionality 19 that's delivered by gas. I don't know if that's a 20 problem, but it's sort of strikingly consistent with 21 the discussion earlier this morning. 22 MS. ARMSTRONG: Everyone's looking at me.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 128 1 I'm -- this is Ashley. I'm of the opinion there's no 2 issue. You can strike it, but 3 MR. AMRANE: I mean -- Karim with AHRI. I 4 mean, today we have product classes that distinguish 5 between gas and electric. 6 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yes. We have different 7 standards. 8 MR. WHITWELL: But my understanding here is 9 that this wouldn't be the gas heating section. This 10 would be -- the context here is on the cooling side, 11 cooling or heating through the refrigeration system. 12 MS. MEYERS: How did you understand that? 13 MR. WHITWELL: Because that's what -- I 14 mean, that's DOE's -- DOE is only -- is covering here 15 the cooling -- the refrigeration system efficiency. 16 It's not necessarily clear, but I think that's the 17 intent, right? I mean, that's what our discussion's 18 all been around. Maybe the language needs to be 19 changed. That was my comment earlier, that I'm a 20 little confused about the language "all systems of a 21 given type of covered product" because we were talking 22 about a specific covered product here anyway, I think.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 129 1 But, you know, I'll defer to DOE on that. 2 MR. FLY: This is Mark Fly with AAON. Does 3 this cover heat pumps also? 4 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yes. 5 MR. FLY: Does it say that? 6 MS. BARHYDT: It doesn't say it. 7 MR. FLY: But there is -- there are two -- I 8 mean, there's different energy efficiency standards 9 for gas heat from electric or no heat. 10 MS. ARMSTRONG: Correct. 11 MR. FLY: So that's where I think the gas 12 would come in. We state that it's gas because here's 13 some accommodation for the pressure drop with a gas 14 furnace, but it's really just a statement that it's 15 gas, not a measurement of the gas furnace in this part 16 of the standard. So a lot of these products are kind 17 of double-regulated in two different areas. 18 MR. THARP: Actually, if you look at the 19 test procedure in the AHRI rating standard, it 20 specifically states electrically driven only. Rusty 21 Tharp with Goodman. I guess I would suggest maybe 22 removing the word "or gas." It's all specifically

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 130 1 electrically driven; at least for this product. 2 MS. ARMSTRONG: It's not in our definition. 3 What about electrically operated? So just to go back, 4 I mean, I think Mark's point is a fairly good one. I 5 don't care how we end up writing the words. I think 6 the key here is that if you take the first section of 7 it that says "or class thereof," the section that 8 you're not too fond of, the key is -- 9 MALE SPEAKER: It's just confusing to me. 10 MS. ARMSTRONG: Okay, not to -- yeah. The 11 key here is that different equipment classes which 12 have different standards cannot be combined in the 13 same basic model. Those are the two concepts of 14 having the same primary energy source and -- or class 15 thereof statement. So to the extent we want to say it 16 a different way, that's what it's trying to convey. 17 MR. WHITWELL: Okay. So it's the -- like 18 the 3 -- or less than 65,000 BTU per hour, 3-phase, 19 and a 10-ton cannot be in the same basic model -- 20 MS. ARMSTRONG: Correct. 21 MR. WHITWELL: -- is what you're saying? 22 Yeah, okay.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 131 1 MR. EISNER: Any other thoughts on this? 2 MS. MEYERS: Well, I do think it needs to be 3 rewritten to be a little bit clearer. I'm not sure I 4 have a suggestion yet on how to reword that, but if 5 most of the OEMs in this room are confused, then we 6 just need some clarifying words in there. I don't 7 think I object to the intent, but I object to the way 8 it's worded. 9 MR. EISNER: People okay with this? 10 MS. ARMSTRONG: This does bring into the 11 issue -- so I will bring this up, not because I don't 12 like my own wording, but this does bring rise the 13 issue where we got a lot of comments on the AEDM rule 14 about what is an equipment class. As long as that's 15 fairly well- understood, then we're okay here. 16 MS. HOOTMAN: Yeah, I just -- I can't 17 remember. And so I don't know if you're going to have 18 a reference to where -- I understand, but I don't 19 know, when you write that out, if you have a reference 20 to where -- 21 MS. ARMSTRONG: We could. 22 MS. HOOTMAN: -- the definitions are.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 132 1 That's all. 2 MR. FLY: This is Mark Fly with AAON. I 3 assume you're going to take note and define equipment 4 class in part of this rulemaking? 5 MS. HOOTMAN: It's already defined. 6 MS. ARMSTRONG: They're already defined by 7 the -- 8 MR. FLY: Is it? 9 MS. ARMSTRONG: -- the standards tables in 10 the 11 CFR. 12 MS. HOOTMAN: Yeah. 13 MR. FLY: Okay. 14 MS. HOOTMAN: Is it called an equipment 15 class or product class? 16 MALE SPEAKER: Product class. 17 MS. HOOTMAN: I think it's called product 18 class, and I think it might help clarify it if we 19 matched it. 20 MS. ARMSTRONG: We use product class or 21 residential equipment class for commercial, but 22 they're the same ideas. So whether or not you use

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 133 1 product class or equipment class, to DOE, it doesn't 2 make any difference, but you will see our nomenclature 3 is equipment class for commercial and industrial 4 equipment and product class for consumer products. 5 That's one of those changes that the lawyers will make 6 during review. 7 MR. EISNER: Any other comments? Is 8 everybody -- anybody have any problems with this? 9 Anybody object? Harvey? 10 MR. SACHS: No. 11 MS. ARMSTRONG: That's great. 12 MR. EISNER: Anybody abstain? 13 MR. AMRANE: I guess just a clarification I 14 maybe forgot about. For the AEDM requirement, do you 15 need to have AEDM equipment class? 16 MS. ARMSTRONG: No. 17 MR. AMRANE: No? It can go across equipment 18 classes? 19 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yes. We define it 20 completely separately. 21 MR. EISNER: No objections, no abstentions? 22 MS. MEYERS: Just one more clarifying

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 134 1 question. So you can have an AEDM across equipment 2 classes, but a basic model cannot be -- 3 MS. ARMSTRONG: Correct. 4 MS. MEYERS: -- is what you're saying here? 5 MS. ARMSTRONG: Correct, because you're 6 coming up with a single rating for a basic model, 7 whereas the AEDM is a tool to come up with a lot of 8 different ratings. 9 MR. EISNER: So we're agreed? No 10 objections? No abstentions? Next issue. 11 MR. WHITWELL: So this is Bob Whitwell. So 12 I don't have an issue with this. I just want to bring 13 up that in the notes from the last meeting, we lost 14 somehow the water-cooled small, large, and very large 15 commercial package, so we just -- I just mention that 16 so that we don't forget that we need to have that 17 basic model. There was a separate page. Previously 18 there was a separate page from the water-cooled. It 19 was missing from the last document. 20 MS. ARMSTRONG: It's missing from here, too. 21 MR. WHITWELL: I thought it might be, but -- 22 and that's why I brought it up. We need --

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 135 1 MR. AMRANE: Is that water source? 2 MR. WHITWELL: Water-cooled. Water-cooled 3 MS. ARMSTRONG: So I would say let's go 4 through these. There was a couple that were added, 5 and water-cooled or evaporatively cooled, I don't know 6 that we ever actually discussed them. 7 MR. WHITWELL: I don't think we did. 8 MS. ARMSTRONG: It might have been a day 9 that I hadn't been here. But let's get through the 10 ones that we have discussed, and to the extent there's 11 additional time at the end of the day, I'll throw some 12 slides up, and we can start those discussions, or it 13 might be a first thing for tomorrow morning if we 14 don't make headway. 15 MR. WHITWELL: That's fine. I just wanted 16 to bring it up -- 17 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah, yeah. 18 MR. WHITWELL: -- so we didn't forget about 19 it. 20 MR. BAUMAN: Did we skip SPVUs, or are we 21 going to go back? 22 MALE SPEAKER: They're later.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 136 1 MS. ARMSTRONG: I thought that would be more 2 difficult, so I put these first. 3 MR. BAUMAN: Okay. That's fine. 4 MS. ARMSTRONG: That was a lunchtime -- 5 MR. BAUMAN: I just want to make sure we 6 didn't forget them. 7 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah. Okay. So the next 8 one is the copper evaporator coil, condenser coil. 9 Position for vote is that copper coils would be 10 tested. 11 MR. EISNER: Any comments? Any objections? 12 MS. HOOTMAN: Yes. Trane objects. Yes. 13 Jill Hootman from Trane objects. 14 MR. EISNER: What's your problem, Jill? 15 MS. HOOTMAN: I don't think they should be 16 included for testing. They're very much one-off. 17 We've said that they're less than 1 percent. They're 18 very rarely built. I think they're in the 1 to 2 19 percent capacity loss. 20 MR. SACHS: Jill, this is Harvey Sachs. I 21 believe you also said that the heat transfer 22 efficiency is very close to that of --

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 137 1 MS. HOOTMAN: It is. It's in a 1 to 2 2 percent. 3 MR. SACHS: So it's -- 4 MS. HOOTMAN: We haven't tested every single 5 combination, but the ones that we have tested, it's 6 within 1 to 2 percent. 7 MR. SACHS: So it's a small fraction of the 8 market, and it's very similar, so the question is just 9 whether DOE should exclude these when it's picking 10 chunks of equipment to 11 MR. RIVEST: Mike Rivest. This is a little 12 different, when we've been talking about for all 13 exclusions having a comparable model that doesn't 14 contain any solution. So if the copper heat exchanger 15 were identical construction to aluminum, then I 16 understand that it would be as efficient, if not more. 17 But you want the flexibility to change a material and 18 change a design. 19 MS. HOOTMAN: Our design is the exact same, 20 so I can speak from -- 21 MR. RIVEST: So that's a difference here. 22 MS. ARMSTRONG: So you would be fine. I

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 138 1 mean, you would -- they would always be better. 2 MR. RIVEST: Right. So maybe that's -- 3 MS. ARMSTRONG: Never have to report it. 4 MS. HOOTMAN: They're actually a little 5 less, because there's a -- it's a little bit thicker, 6 so there's a fan pressure drop across it, so it's a 7 thicker fin material, so there's more fan pressure 8 drop across, so there's actually a little less. 9 MR. HUNT: I object. 10 MR. EISNER: Other objections, other 11 comments? 12 MR. SACHS: This is Harvey, and the 13 Department has stated that it should be included, but 14 I didn't hear much in the basis for that. In 15 argument, Jill stated that she didn't think it should 16 be included. Try to help me understand why it's not 17 really asking why the Department would want to 18 preserve -- what the arguments are for preserving the 19 freedom to test the all-copper heat exchanger option? 20 MS. ARMSTRONG: I mean, Harvey, I think Mike 21 just explained it. It gets to the point of having an 22 identical model, and to date, what our discussions

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 139 1 have been around is whether or not, when you change to 2 copper, the heat exchanger design is also optimized to 3 get the same -- to get a comparable level of 4 performance, but it's not identical. It's -- so I 5 think that's -- Jill's stating that hers is. There 6 are other people that have stated on the record at 7 previous meetings that theirs is not. 8 From our perspective, we believe that, of an 9 identical design, at least from the discussions to 10 date, although Jill just said this wasn't true for 11 hers, that copper has better heat transfer properties, 12 so in theory, an identical design should give you 13 better performance. 14 However, if you have optimized that design, 15 meaning changing the fins per inch or changing the 16 rows or whatever, to reduce the amount of copper you 17 may have to use, but maintain a comparable level of 18 performance, it's a different unit, and that's where 19 it comes in. 20 Now, is the reality -- if this is just 1 21 percent of the market, is the reality the Department's 22 going to pick those? No, but should we be able to if

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 140 1 the designs are different? Yes. It's not functional. 2 It's not identical, and that's the premise behind a 3 lot of these exclusions, that an identical unit will 4 be available for testing, and it has to be the same 5 across all manufacturers, and this is something that's 6 not treated the same. 7 MR. SACHS: This is Harvey again. Thank 8 you. I guess I'd like to hear what the other 9 manufacturers have to say. 10 MS. ARMSTRONG: Sure. 11 MR. AMRANE: This is Karim with AHRI. When 12 we say an identical unit, it's going to be the same 13 unit, with a maybe heat exchanger, of course, but it's 14 going to be the same -- going to have the same 15 components, so 16 MS. ARMSTRONG: But the heat exchanger 17 design is different, Karim. 18 MR. AMRANE: It's going to be different heat 19 exchanger, yes. 20 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah, I mean, that's the 21 fundamental thing we're talking about; right? 22 MR. WHITWELL: So this is Bob Whitwell from

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 141 1 Carrier. In our case, sometimes it's exactly the same 2 as far as tube circuiting, fin count. Other times 3 it's not exactly the same. For example, in some 4 cases, we have a louvered fin with aluminum, and with 5 the copper, because of the properties of the material 6 and its impact on the fin die, we do not have louvered 7 fin with copper, so we have to change the fin count, 8 which does -- can have some impact on the air side 9 resistance. 10 The -- in many cases, these products, the 11 heat transfer, total heat transfer is more severely 12 impacted by changes on their side than the refrigerant 13 side. So the additional heat transfer capability of 14 the copper does not necessarily help us in this case 15 because it's air side that -- the residential is 16 thermal -- or the heat transfer is -- residential is 17 higher on the air side. 18 So we will have a performance difference. 19 We will have to change our design in some cases from 20 where we have today. It's going to add more cost to 21 the product. 22 MR. RIVEST: This is Mike Rivest. Jill, I

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 142 1 think what you're asking is basically that air 2 conditioners with copper heat exchangers not be 3 regulated. That's effectively what -- how I'm reading 4 it. I'm sure that's not your intent, but that would 5 be the outcome; right? So someone could sell a -- 6 MS. HOOTMAN: Well, isn't that the outcome 7 of all of that? 8 MR. RIVEST: No, because -- see, compare 9 with a coated coal. Here, we would have, as a 10 control, the non-coated coil. We can test it. 11 MS. ARMSTRONG: That is the difference. 12 MR. RIVEST: Copper, there's nothing to 13 compare it to. It's just we're not allowed to touch 14 it, right? 15 MS. HOOTMAN: Well, but if it's -- I mean, I 16 understand what Bob is saying. That doesn't happen 17 for ours, but I understand what he's getting at with 18 the louvered design, but if it is the exact same 19 construction, same fin surface, same fins per inch, 20 same square footage, it is essentially the same coil. 21 MR. RIVEST: I think, then, it's closer to 22 what we're doing with coated coils, but that's not

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 143 1 reflected in the language. It would have to be 2 refined. 3 MR. FLY: This is Mark Fly with AAON. I 4 just have a question for Ashley. If we had -- let's 5 say that we had a coated -- a copper coil and the 6 performance was the same. Could we make that part of 7 the same basic model? Could I have a copper coil 8 basic model and an aluminum coil basic model? You 9 could pick either one to test, and as long as the 10 ratings were the same, would they be the same basic 11 model? 12 MS. ARMSTRONG: Absolutely. Yes. 13 MS. HOOTMAN: And that's what I want to do 14 is 15

-- 16 MR. FLY: Because it's not the -- 17 MS. ARMSTRONG: You can absolutely do that 18 MS. HOOTMAN: I don't want to distinguish 19 it. 20 MS. ARMSTRONG: But the only thing this 21 allows us to do is I can pick the copper one or the 22 aluminum one. It doesn't require you to do separate

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 144 1 basic models. But what Mike said is true. 2 Essentially, what you're setting up by asking for an 3 exclusion here and not having a control or an 4 identical model is saying copper coil units are not 5 regulated, and that's something we can't agree to. 6 MR. STANONIK: This is Frank with AHRI. 7 This discussion seems like -- well, it seems like 8 we've lost our track here. Okay? This -- the basic 9 premise here is we are talking about a basic model 10 definition and options that are available off of a 11 basic model. That's a critical initial condition. 12 And Mike's comments were suggesting, "Well, 13 but if you only offer the copper coil, then we 14 wouldn't be regulating it." I would say that's 15 absolutely incorrect, because, again, this whole 16 discussion's about things that the manufacturer offers 17 as options off a model. So if the model only comes 18 with copper coils, there's no longer an option. 19 FEMALE SPEAKER: Right. It is the model. 20 MR. STANONIK: It is the model. It would 21 get tested. It would be regulated. But if -- using 22 Robert's situation or example, where they have some

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 145 1 models where they give you the exact same coil, but 2 it's copper, that's an option, and in that case, why 3 would you need to test it? 4 But I think Mike -- I think your point is 5 you can't lose sight of this. These are -- everything 6 here is preceded by the statement that this is an 7 option that can be ordered off a basic model. That's 8 the only thing we're talking about. As soon as it's 9 no longer an option -- that's the only way any 10 manufacturer -- if that's the only way they provide 11 that model, that's the model. And we can't say, "Oh, 12 we didn't really mean that." That's where we started 13 from. 14 MR. HUNT: Hi. This is Marshall Hunt, PG&E, 15 and I was objecting to it for several reasons. I 16 always look at things from the customer point of view, 17 and these coils are going to be better for the 18 customer. 19 If they don't want to spend the money, and 20 it's always going to be more expensive, which means 21 the percentage of the market will be held down 22 naturally, if they want to spend the extra money to

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 146 1 get a longer- term energy efficiency, which I care 2 about, then I don't want to create a special class, 3 and I do believe, as Frank said, that we aren't just 4 deregulating. 5 It's part of an option, and as a mechanical 6 engineer, design engineer, in the past, whenever I 7 pull up a model, and I have all these options, still 8 the basic engineering data stays very, very similar. 9 Maybe you have a footnote or something, but -- check 10 with the manufacturers -- but you probably don't have 11 a whole new engineering data tape of details. You're 12 using the same details. So for me as the design 13 engineer, it is working the same in terms of the 14 actual performance capacity and whatnot, airflow. 15 MR. RIVEST: This is Mike Rivest. So I'm 16 trying to understand what Frank said. Frank, are you 17 saying that if the copper foil was being manufactured 18 as a different design from the aluminum foil, it would 19 simply be a different basic model, and it would be 20 certified that way, and could we test it out? 21 MR. STANONIK: Frank Stanonik, AHRI. I 22 would guess I'm trying to make sure we're talking at

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 147 1 the same thing, not talking above each other or over 2 each other. I'm looking at that -- looking at this 3 maybe a little more like the way Marshall was 4 describing it. Okay? 5 There's this basic model that I have 6 designed. I have essential engineering parameters or 7 information about it, design information about it. 8 And you're my customer, and you say, "Okay, I want 9 that model, but I don't want the standard coils. I 10 want my coils to be copper." 11 I'm -- and Mike -- and I'll certainly get 12 corrected, but I'm assuming that those copper coils 13 would be basically the same design as the standard 14 coils. In that case, to me, you just -- you picked, 15 let's say, a deluxe option. You -- you know, you 16 said, "I wanted a" -- 17 MS. ARMSTRONG: So I think you just hit the 18 keyword, "basically the same." What does that mean? 19 Because what if somebody comes in, and they're arguing 20 theirs are basically the same, but it's really not 21 basically the same? We've effectively said, "We can't 22 test your copper coil unit.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 148 1 MR. STANONIK: Well, I -- 2 MS. ARMSTRONG: And what if it -- yes, the 3 consumer may pay more money, but they're not going to 4 pay more money if somebody -- maybe not anyone in this 5 room, but if somebody decides to sell one that's 20 6 percent below the standard? Because they know DOE 7 can't test it, but they're calling it "basically the 8 same." 9 MR. STANONIK: Well, okay. All right. So a 10 coil had -- 11 MS. ARMSTRONG: I mean, that's the problem. 12 In the rest of these options, we say "A unit must be - 13 - that's otherwise identical." So Jill's unit, for 14 example, that she says, "Mine is identical, except for 15 one's copper, one's aluminum." That's okay. Bob's 16 unit, who he says, "Well, I made modifications. At 17 the end of the day, it comes out comparable, but I 18 made modifications," it's not identical. That's not 19 okay. 20 The question is we have this difference here 21 in the industry that -- how do we reconcile that? And 22 our going-in position is we can test them. You can

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 149 1 group them as the same basic model. You don't need to 2 rate them separately. You don't need to run your AEDM 3 separately, but DOE could pull them. 4 MR. STANONIK: All right. So this unit has 5 the same cooling capacity. Let's start with that; 6 right? I mean, it would have the same cooling 7 capacity, or within BTUs, whatever. Okay? It would 8 have the same cooling capacity. The coil would -- how 9 can I explain this? To my thinking -- 10 MS. ARMSTRONG: I mean, I get it. 11 MR. STANONIK: The coil would -- 12 MS. ARMSTRONG: It's not that I don't get 13 it. 14 MR. STANONIK: The coil would have 15 essentially the same performance, although it may not 16 be exactly the same efficiency. It's going to have 17 the same heat transfer performance. 18 MR. CLEMENTS: If it has the same number of 19 rows, fins per inch. 20 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah, but it doesn't. 21 MR. CYMBALSKY: But it doesn't. He just 22 said they changed all the other there, too. How is

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 150 1 that the same? 2 MS. ARMSTRONG: That's the key. 3 MR. WHITWELL: Look, I mean, I'm okay with 4 the DOE position. I think there are other things that 5 are more of an impact here that we need to discuss. 6 MS. ARMSTRONG: Right. That was kind of 7 DOE's position as well. 8 MR. RIVEST: Mike Rivest. Jill, were you 9 objecting to having the burden of certification? 10 MS. HOOTMAN: Yes. 11 MR. RIVEST: But -- 12 MS. ARMSTRONG: You don't have to do that. 13 MR. RIVEST: -- if you don't have to certify 14 separately -- simply, all this allows DOE to test -- 15 MS. HOOTMAN: Let's make that another basic 16 model. 17 MS. ARMSTRONG: You do not. 18 MS. HOOTMAN: And show you the performance. 19 MR. WHITWELL: This -- that's where the part 20 of the asterisk that we can include -- 21 MS. ARMSTRONG: Absolutely. 22 MR. WHITWELL: -- in our basic model

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 151 1 definition; right? 2 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah. 3 MR. WHITWELL: Would this include coated 4 copper coils? 5 MS. ARMSTRONG: We haven't gotten to coated 6 copper coils. 7 MS. HOOTMAN: Oh, my God, if somebody 8 (inaudible). 9 MS. ARMSTRONG: And I thought this one was 10 going to be the easier one. 11 MR. EISNER: So, Jill, you would have -- I 12 have an objection. If there was an asterisk here 13 saying if all else is the same, the copper model 14 doesn't have to be tested 15 MS. HOOTMAN: We would have an objection 16 then. 17 MR. EISNER: Well, you're saying if it's the 18 same except for the copper. 19 MS. ARMSTRONG: They can group it as the 20 same basic model. The Department wants to retain the 21 ability to test it. 22 MR. EISNER: To test it, that's all?

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 152 1 MS. ARMSTRONG: If we had a need to. 2 MS. BARHYDT: If they're really the same, 3 and we're willing to pay the money to buy one with the 4 copper, we want to be able to test it. 5 MR. EISNER: But you're willing to accept 6 that, as long as 7 MS. BARHYDT: Yes, I am willing to accept 8 that. 9 MS. ARMSTRONG: That's what that means. 10 MR. EISNER: So a footnote here would help 11 you. There was an objection from you. 12 MS. HOOTMAN: It won't help -- 13 MR. EISNER: It would help you, Marshall? 14 MR. HUNT: Yeah. 15 MS. HOOTMAN: It won't help Bob, but he's 16 willing to go either way. 17 MR. EISNER: But Bob is willing to go with 18 it. So if I command -- 19 MR. WHITWELL: With our AEDM, we will 20 redesign the coils so that the performance would be 21 the same, and -- 22 MALE SPEAKER: Thank you.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 153 1 MR. WHITWELL: -- we'll toss DOE more to buy 2

- 3 - 4 MS. ARMSTRONG: And he's happy to sell it to 5 us. 6 MR. WHITWELL: So we will have more margin 7 on it, so 8 MALE SPEAKER: Yeah, where's all the 9 taxpayers? 10 MALE SPEAKER: Right. 11 MALE SPEAKER: And the customers will be 12 well- served, so 13 MR. FLY: This is Mark Fly with AAON. So 14 the -- I mean, by saying that we can put them in the 15 same model group, it says that when we say the same 16 evaporator coil, these are seen by DOE as the same 17 evaporator coil, going back to the master definition. 18 MS. ARMSTRONG: Can you go back? It says 19 comparable, I think. Same or comparably performing. 20 Yeah. 21 MALE SPEAKER: So it's comparable? 22 MR. EISNER: Are we happy, or do we have to

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 154 1 add language? Are we happy with what's up there? 2 MS. HOOTMAN: All right. I take mine away. 3 MR. EISNER: And you won't make one? 4 MR. WHITWELL: I didn't make one. I'm 5 holding my -- 6 MR. EISNER: Somehow or other, I think 7 you're responsible for all the problems. 8 Okay. So there -- this is now unanimous. 9 MS. BARHYDT: Okay. So economizers, an 10 automatic system that enables a cooling system to 11 supply outdoor air to reduce or eliminate the need for 12 mechanical cooling during mild or cold weather. DOE 13 would issue enforcement guidance indicating that 14 testing will not be performed on units with 15 economizers; however, an otherwise identical unit must 16 be available for testing. 17 MR. EISNER: Any questions, concerns? Any 18 objections? 19 MR. SACHS: You guys move faster than I 20 think. 21 MR. CYMBALSKY: We're economizing on time. 22 MR. SACHS: I guess what I'm thinking about

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 155 1 is we're now starting to see regionally specific 2 models, so I might have a model which is only 3 available for western use with an integrated 4 economizer. It might even have direct-to-indirect 5 heat exchange to cool the incoming air. Oh, it's not 6 available without an economizer function. So I think 7 your response is, well, that's a different basic 8 model, then, but it -- I'm not sure what it means to 9 say that you would take that western cooling 10 hypermodel, strip off all the stuff that makes it 11 special, test it, and try to put the sheet metal back 12 together? 13 MS. ARMSTRONG: That's not what we're 14 saying. If there's not an identical unit without it 15 available, we would test it as is. Yeah, there would 16 have to be testing. 17 MR. SACHS: Okay. Now, in that case, that 18 would seem like it might be a constraint on the 19 manufacturers in terms of -- 20 MS. HOOTMAN: It will. 21 MR. SACHS: -- things that will degrade test 22 performance while improving field performance.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 156 1 MS. HOOTMAN: Well, I -- yeah, Harvey, this 2 is Jill from Trane. I don't know that, but what it 3 will say is if I have to set up separate models and 4 include tests for those and/or AEDMs and do all my 5 background and all that, make that separate than my 6 others, we'd really have to look at the marketability 7 of it and how much am I going to get out of that, 8 weigh that against whether I can support all the 9 engineering data that has to go beyond it? So it 10 would effectively squash it for a while. I'll tell 11 you that. 12 MR. SACHS: I'm thinking in particular, not 13 so much of the western models, but models that some 14 manufacturers are working on with enhanced (inaudible) 15 medication capabilities, which may well involve 16 increased pressure drops and more fan power. 17 MS. MEYERS: This is Karen with Rheem. So 18 how would a lab test a unit with integrated 19 economizers. 20 MS. ARMSTRONG: So how would you test it? 21 That's the first one. The first out the gate would be 22 in order to distribute it into commerce, you would

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 157 1 have to certify it, and in order to certify it, you'd 2 have to come up with a rating. In order to come up 3 with a rating, you need a procedure. So if the 4 current test procedure doesn't accommodate it, then 5 we'll be working through the waiver process. 6 I mean, the key here, right -- the 7 fundamental premise behind all of these, and what we 8 agreed to when we started this discussion, was -- a 9 long time ago was the Department's willing to consider 10 a lot of these when there's this idea of a base model. 11 There's this idea of a control value for testing. 12 And so we're willing to exclude or 13 potentially not consider or say they're not required 14 to be tested a lot of these options if there's a base 15 model to compare it to. To Harvey's example, if 16 there's nothing else out there, I can't just say it's 17 not regulated, period. 18 MR. SACHS: No, I very much understand that, 19 but at the same time, we're trying very hard to make 20 an environment that's innovation-friendly. 21 MS. ARMSTRONG: Absolutely. 22 MR. SACHS: And that's one of those things

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 158 1 were trying to do with AEDM, so I'm very conscious 2 that there may be a problem, and I'm not at all sure 3 that I know what the answer is. In fact, I'm damn 4 sure I don't. 5 MR. FLY: Mark Fly with AAON. Harvey, as 6 long as we stay with a single-number metric and a 7 single test condition, then we can't -- you know, then 8 we would have to make this a different equipment class 9 with its own energy efficiency and a different test 10 condition. 11 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yes. 12 MR. FLY: So we're not there today. If we 13 want to promote that, that's what would have to be 14 done, I think, because it's not going to look very, 15 you know -- high heat and dehumidification unit isn't 16 going to look very interesting at 80, 60, 70 coming 17 into the coils, and neither will a Western Cooling 18 Alliance-type unit. 19 MR. SACHS: So thank you, Mark, and -- this 20 is Harvey. And what I'm inferring is that we've got a 21 stepwise procedure here and that ultimately AEDMs 22 themselves are a step toward getting multi-parameter

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 159 1 rating methods that will be responsive to these 2 things. Well, hurry up. 3 MR. EISNER: So where are we on this? 4 MS. ARMSTRONG: A vote. I think we can 5 vote. 6 MR. EISNER: Does anybody object? Does 7 anybody abstain? All right. Next issue, ventilation. 8 MS. BARHYDT: Ventilation energy recovery 9 systems, an assembly that preconditions outdoor air 10 entering the equipment through direct or indirect 11 thermal and/or moisture exchange with the exhaust air, 12 which is defined as the building air being exhausted 13 to the outside from the equipment. 14 DOE would issue enforcement guidance, 15 indicating that testing will not be performed on a 16 unit with VERS; however, an otherwise identical unit 17 must be available for testing. 18 MR. EISNER: Any concerns, any questions? 19 Any objections? Any abstentions? 20 MR. HUNT: Wait, I'd like to ask a question. 21 Marshall Hunt, PG&E. Maybe, Mark Fly, you could help 22 me with this -- with this single metric -- at that

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 160 1 single-metric test point, you could have an ERV or an 2 HRV working, correct? Because you're exhausting air, 3 and you could heat exchange with that 80-degree 4 exhaust air against the 95 coming in; correct? And I 5 think the 95 has humidity, or maybe it doesn't have 6 humidity. Is there -- 7 MR. WHITWELL: Seventy-five. 8 MR. HUNT: Seventy-five? Yeah. So there is 9 a possibility with that. I mean, I'm not going to 10 object to this, but I think it's interesting that as 11 we looked forward to these newer systems, we looked at 12 this. 13 MR. FLY: It might not be enough to offset 14 the pressure drops. 15 MR. WHITWELL: Yeah, you have pressure 16 drops, and you also may have fans running as part of 17 the ERV system, which are going to add to the total 18 system power. 19 MR. HUNT: Okay. 20 MR. EISNER: Any other questions? Are there 21 any objections? Any abstentions? 22 Okay. Next issue.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 161 1 MS. BARHYDT: Copper coils, an indoor coil 2 or outdoor coil whose entire surface, including the 3 entire surface of both fins and tubes, is covered with 4 a thin continuous nonporous coating to reduce 5 corrosion. DOE would issue enforcement guidance 6 indicating the testing will not be performed on a unit 7 meeting the definition of a coated coal; however, an 8 otherwise identical unit must be available for 9 testing. Is that a different definition of a coated 10 coal? 11 MS. ARMSTRONG: That is the definition that 12 I was under the impression was -- 13 MS. BARHYDT: Okay. 14 MS. ARMSTRONG: -- presented last week. 15 MS. BARHYDT: That's right. 16 MR. CYMBALSKY: The dictionary. 17 MS. BARHYDT: So the definition of a coated 18 coil is an optional coil that is selected to provide 19 excellent resistance and durability to corrosive 20 effects of alkalized acids -- alcohols, petroleums, 21 sea water, salty air, and other corrosive 22 environments. Typical processes include baked phenol

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 162 1 epoxy type, electrodisposition coating, and/or 2 thermostat final coating that is bonded after a coil 3 is assembled, covering the coil tubes, headers, and 4 fin service. 5 Coils can be assembled from fin stuff that 6 has been coated prior to the fin-stamping process. 7 Corrosion durability shall be confirmed through 8 testing per ASTM B117, salt spray test, to a minimum 9 of 500 hours. 10 MR. EISNER: Yes? 11 MR. STEPHENS: Phillip Stevens, HTP. Why 12 are we talking about corrosion resistance in an 13 efficiency test? 14 MS. HOOTMAN: Mainly to define what a coated 15 coil was, how would they verify that a coated coil 16 was, in fact, coated and was not just spray-painted 17 on? 18 MR. THARP: Rusty Tharp, Goodman. A couple 19 questions. On the test procedure STMB 117, I would 20 like to suggest that we add "for ASTM G85," because a 21 lot of products are tested to F85 also, and basically 22 say B117, G85, or equivalent in the test procedure.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 163 1 MS. ARMSTRONG: And what does equivalent 2 mean? Who makes that determination? 3 MR. THARP: You can if you want. 4 MS. ARMSTRONG: I'm trying not to have to do 5 that. 6 MR. THARP: Or DOE-approved equivalent. 7 Also, just a question to the OEMs, I guess. The 8 (inaudible) epoxy-type electrum deposition coating, is 9 that basically the long version of Eco? 10 MS. HOOTMAN: Yeah. Yeah. Lupin (ph), Eco. 11 Those trade names, yeah. 12 MR. SACHS: Just for my own information, 13 it's an outer coat? 14 MS. HOOTMAN: No. 15 MR. SACHS: It's different from outer coats. 16 Thank you. 17 MS. ARMSTRONG: That's spray paint. 18 MS. HOOTMAN: That is -- 19 MS. ARMSTRONG: Close enough; right? 20 MS. HOOTMAN: Yeah. 21 MR. EISNER: Anything else on this? 22 MS. BARHYDT: DOE's not comfortable with the

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 164 1 "or equivalent." 2 MS. HOOTMAN: Yeah, I don't blame you. 3 MS. ARMSTRONG: If we need to add a version 4 later, just come to DOE. This is guidance, so it's 5 not a -- this is enforcement guidance, too, so it's 6 not something we issue for notice in a long comment 7 period. 8 MR. STEPHENS: Phillip Stephens, HTP. So as 9 long as the manufacturer has a test record on file 10 that, yes, I tested this coil to this test method or 11 equivalent, then that meets your need, or will you be 12 pulling these things and sending them out to us? 13 MS. ARMSTRONG: I'm not plan -- well -- I 14 don't know. I don't know. We hope to never get in 15 this situation. I would say that the Department 16 retains the ability to ask for records or test them if 17 we needed to, if there was a question as to whether 18 something is actually a coated coil or not. 19 MS. HOOTMAN: Pretty much -- this is Jill 20 from Trane. Pretty much all of us OEMs already right 21 now put in our public literature that we test to this 22 standard and how many hours. It's already stated.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 165 1 It's a self-certification. 2 MR. THARP: And just for clarification of 3 what's on the screen, I put the words "or ASTM" 4 between B117 and G85. Thank you. 5 MS. ARMSTRONG: And/or. Thank you. 6 MR. EISNER: Other comments, concerns? Any 7 objections? Any abstentions? 8 MS. BARHYDT: Process heat recovery, reclaim 9 coils, thermal storage. A heat exchanger located 10 inside the equipment that conditions the equipment's 11 supply air using energy transferred from an external 12 source using a vapor, gas, or liquid. 13 DOE would issue enforcement guidance 14 indicating that testing will not be performed on a 15 unit with these options; however, an otherwise 16 identical unit must be available for testing. 17 MR. EISNER: Comments, questions? Any 18 objections? Any abstentions? 19 MS. BARHYDT: Correction capacitors, a 20 capacitor that increases the power factor measured at 21 the line connection to the equipment. DOE would issue 22 test procedure guidance that power should be measured

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 166 1 downstream of a capacitor or that the capacitor should 2 be disconnected when testing. 3 MR. EISNER: And any comments, any 4 questions? Any objections? Any abstentions? 5 Okay. Next issue. 6 MS. BARHYDT: Hail guards, a grille or 7 similar structure mounted to the outside of the unit, 8 covering the outdoor coil to protect the coil from 9 hail, flying debris and damage from large objects. 10 DOE will issue guidance indicating that hail guards 11 should be removed during testing if present. 12 MR. EISNER: Any questions or comments? Any 13 objections? Any abstentions? 14 Okay. Next issue. 15 MS. BARHYDT: Dehumidification components, 16 an assembly that reduces the moisture content of the 17 supply air through moisture transfer with solid or 18 liquid desiccants. Liquid -- some examples are a 19 liquid desiccant system and desiccant wheels. DOE 20 would issue enforcement guidance indicating that 21 testing will not be performed on units with 22 dehumidification components; however, an otherwise

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 167 1 identical unit must be available for testing. 2 MR. EISNER: Any comments or questions? Any 3 objections to this language? Any abstentions? You 4 know. 5 MS. BARHYDT: Indoor or outdoor fan motors, 6 VVD, a deice connected electrically between the 7 equipment's power supply connection and the indoor fan 8 motor that can vary the frequency of power supplied to 9 the motor in order to allow variation of the motor's 10 rotational speed. DOE would issue guidance that the 11 Department will not test a unit with an integrated 12 VFD; however, an otherwise identical unit must be 13 available for testing. 14 MR. EISNER: Any comments or questions? 15 MR. WHITWELL: Yeah, so just a 16 clarification. If we have a unit, a model that is only 17 available with VFD, then you would test with the VFD; 18 correct? 19 MS. ARMSTRONG: Correct. 20 MR. WHITWELL: Okay. Good. Thank you. 21 MR. EISNER: Okay. Anything else? Anybody 22 have any objections?

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 168 1 MR. HUNT: Should that be made explicit, 2 Bob's point? 3 MS. ARMSTRONG: We can -- the whole -- 4 there's a slide at the very end that has a summary 5 slide for all of these. It's going to have that 6 explicitly stated, and it's going to be a premise of 7 any of these guidance documents we issue. 8 MR. EISNER: Anything else? Any objections? 9 Any abstentions? 10 Next issue. 11 MS. BARHYDT: Condenser fan motor options 12 for ducting. A condenser fan motor assembly designed 13 for external ducting of condenser air that provides 14 greater pressure rise and has a higher-rated motor 15 horsepower than the condenser fan provided as a 16 standard component with the equipment. 17 DOE would issue guidance indicating that a 18 ducted unit would not be tested; however, an identical 19 non-ducted unit must be available for testing. 20 MR. WHITWELL: So -- Bob Whitwell again. So 21 in our case, we have -- the product -- it's not that 22 we have ducted and non-ducted models. We have product

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 169 1 that can be ducted on the condenser side. 2 MS. ARMSTRONG: We'd test that not ducted. 3 MR. WHITWELL: You will test it non-ducted; 4 right? 5 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah. 6 MR. WHITWELL: So unducted; right? 7 MS. ARMSTRONG: Unducted. 8 MR. WHITWELL: That was the clarification I 9 was looking for. And I would guess that you would 10 also, like we spoke about last time on the evaporator 11 -- on the indoor motor, evaporator motor, you would 12 seek input on what is the standard motor to be tested 13 in that unducted 14 MS. ARMSTRONG: It should be the one you 15 certify, your -- 16 MR. WHITWELL: Right, so -- 17 MS. ARMSTRONG: -- the base model you claim. 18 MR. WHITWELL: So there would be -- one of 19 the inputs could be a -- we would have to provide the 20 horsepower of that -- 21 MS. ARMSTRONG: The type of motor or 22 whatever you want, yes.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 170 1 MR. WHITWELL: Okay. 2 MS. ARMSTRONG: However you differentiate 3 that. 4 MR. WHITWELL: Yeah. So there will be 5 something in the certification to provide that. 6 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah. 7 MR. WHITWELL: Okay. 8 MR. JOHNSON: Yeah, to that point -- Tom 9 Johnson -- it may not be ducting. Maybe it's a 10 different condenser fan blade, and it just -- it's 11 more efficient, but it requires a different motor? So 12 it's all about the motor that you're talking about 13 here and what you issue for standard testing. 14 MS. ARMSTRONG: That's not exactly what it 15 says. 16 MR. JOHNSON: You're right. 17 MS. ARMSTRONG: So if that is where we're 18 going, we need to change some stuff, because that is 19 definitely not what that says. 20 MR. JOHNSON: That would be a different 21 situation than what -- 22 MS. ARMSTRONG: This is all about ducting.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 171 1 I mean, it includes the option where you have a larger 2 motor because you're ducting the unit, but it doesn't 3 include just offering a larger motor, period. 4 MR. JOHNSON: Yeah. Yeah, what I'm talking 5 about is a different condenser fan blade, and it might 6 be a different motor. So how do you deal with that? 7 MS. ARMSTRONG: Right now, the way this is 8 set up? It's just a different base model or could be. 9 If it's more efficient, then you could claim it to be 10

-- 11 MR. JOHNSON: No, it's really more from a 12 noise standpoint. 13 MS. ARMSTRONG: There's nothing here. 14 MR. WHITWELL: Can -- or, no, go ahead, 15 finish your comment. 16 MR. JOHNSON: No, I'm still thinking. 17 MR. WHITWELL: Okay. I was going to comment 18 on the language up there. So should that say, "An 19 unducted unit will be tested with a standard motor," 20 or something like that? I mean, that's really what 21 we're talking about, what I understood your comment to 22 be.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 172 1 MR. JOHNSON: You know what? I think we're 2 okay, actually, the more I think about it. 3 MS. ARMSTRONG: Okay. Yes, we can clarify 4 what that means. 5 MR. STANONIK: This is Frank. At the last 6 meeting, that point was exactly made, and at least 7 tentatively agreed to that the manufacturer would 8 specify the standard -- 9 MR. WHITWELL: Right. That's the way I -- 10 that was my -- 11 MS. ARMSTRONG: And that's fine. It's just 12 a matter of how we do it. 13 MR. WHITWELL: Yeah. Yeah, I just -- 14 MS. ARMSTRONG: But that was the intention 15 here. 16 MR. WHITWELL: That's what I thought. I 17 just thought -- I wanted to make sure that that was 18 understood. 19 MS. ARMSTRONG: Okay. 20 MR. EISNER: We have a question from Rodney 21 Beaver. I'm not sure I understand it. "Does this 22 mean that any units that are ducted our standard would

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 173 1 be excluded?" 2 MS. ARMSTRONG: No. They would all have to 3 be tested. 4 MR. EISNER: There is no model available 5 that would be non-ducted. 6 MS. ARMSTRONG: He has to test all of his. 7 And if he needs a test for seizure waiver, he needs to 8 come to the Department. This is the same issue we 9 went through a couple weeks ago. 10 MR. EISNER: Rodney, hope you heard that. 11 Okay. As changed, any more comments? Any 12 objections? Any abstentions? 13 MR. THARP: Before we move on to the next, 14 if I may. The last one was VFD indoor/outdoor fan. 15 And we added a compressor VFD towards the end or -- 16 MS. ARMSTRONG: I don't think so. But I do 17 remember that coming up, similarly. 18 MR. THARP: Do you want to handle that now, 19 since you just did indoor/outdoor VFD? 20 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah, just go ahead and add 21 it on to that last one, however you want to do it. 22 MR. THARP: I would suggest just copy and

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 174 1 pasting and changing indoor/outdoor fan in order to -- 2 MR. WHITWELL: So, and just for 3 clarification, so this is where the VFD is an option 4 and is not required in order to operate the 5 compressor? 6 MS. HOOTMAN: Yes, it's not the essential 7 basic compressor. Right. 8 MR. THARP: What do you want this one? 9 MS. ARMSTRONG: Just compressor VFD. So, 10 instead of "and/or fan motor" and the description, put 11 compressor. 12 MR. SACHS: It sort of sounds a maybe not 13 intended consequence that where the VFD is an option 14 within a product line, could be part of the same basic 15 model group. Is that true? Although I'd be accepting 16 a lower efficiency rating. 17 MS. HOOTMAN: Correct. Right. 18 MR. SACHS: But the word in here would 19 probably require a two-speed compressor to be treated 20 differently from a modulating compressor. Is it 21 explicitly is it about the kind of motor control, the 22 VFD, as opposed to something, like, say the speed two

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 175 1

-- 2 MS. HOOTMAN: Well, three speed, you would 3 likely have a different base model. 4 MR. SACHS: It seems like you would have to. 5 MS. HOOTMAN: This is not essentially the 6 same. 7 MR. SACHS: Yeah. 8 MS. HOOTMAN: I think our original 9 description -- 10 MR. SACHS: We'll see if it comes to a 11 reverse rotation two-piston unit? 12 MALE SPEAKER: Yeah. TS. 13 MR. SACHS: TS. 14 MR. THARP: Harvey, this is Rusty from 15 Goodman. On the -- just a minor correction with your 16 statement, there's actually for a steady state EER 17 this compressor with VFD would be slightly less 18 efficient -- 19 MR. SACHS: Sure. 20 MS. HOOTMAN: Well, that's true -- 21 MR. THARP: -- than the IER -- 22 MS. HOOTMAN: -- than IEOs.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 176 1 MR. THARP: -- would be much better. 2 MR. SACHS: Yes. Thank you. Thank you. 3 MS. HOOTMAN: So, in our general basic 4 description, we have an air moving system that's 5 comparable to the same, which means it's probably not. 6 MR. WHITWELL: At the test condition, it 7 would be the same. 8 MS. HOOTMAN: Well, you're right. 9 MR. WHITWELL: It would be comparable at the 10 test condition. 11 MR. EISNER: Any more comments on this? Any 12 objections to the language? Any abstentions? 13 Great. 14 MS. BARHYDT: Steam Hydronic Heat Options in 15 Indoor Fan Assembly, including a motor that drives the 16 fan that can deliver higher external static pressure 17 than the standard indoor fan assembly sold with the 18 equipment. 19 DOE will issue guidance indicating that an 20 identical model with electric resistance heating 21 should be tested and rated, rather than the hydronic 22 coil. The model is only offered with hydronic heat,

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 177 1 then the hydronic model should be tested and rated. 2 MR. EISNER: Comments? Questions? 3 MR. WHITWELL: Yeah, so question on this. 4 So -- or a comment. So, if a electric heat option is 5 not available, so that it's a product with options, 6 heat options, so either a steam coil or a hydronic 7 coil could be added in there, if electric heat is not 8 an option, then it has to be tested with the coil in 9 there. So, the alternative would be -- could be a 10 separate heating system, stand alone heating system 11 with a separate fan and has higher power implications 12 for the building. 13 MR. EISNER: Let the record reflect she was 14 nodding her head yes. 15 MS. ARMSTRONG: I was trying to avoid that. 16 MR. WHITWELL: I'm sorry? 17 MS. ARMSTRONG: I was trying to avoid that 18 record. I know where we're going with this. I don't 19 know what else -- what other options we have, though. 20 I mean, if an option -- if a unit is only available 21 with hydronic or steam heat, what do you want us to do 22 you?

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 178 1 MR. WHITWELL: I would say then you test the 2 system -- the unit without hydronic or steam coil. An 3 identical unit must be available without the hydronic 4 or steam coil, so you're testing the refrigeration 5 system in the unit as it would be provided for the 6 cooling operation, would be my recommendation. 7 MR. SACHS: Bob, I think I understand your 8 point, but the reason I'm quiet about the resistance 9 heat model as the alternative to be tested was my 10 sense is that an awful large fraction are sold with 11 some sort of heating section and this gives us a proxy 12 for representing the pressure mount. That's very 13 closely related to the refrigeration section. 14 MR. WHITWELL: For me, for my company, the 15 only product we have in this category that has steam 16 or hydronic heat, we have no electric heat option. 17 It's not -- has not been a requirement. So, what that 18 means is that I will put a electric heat option in the 19 catalog just to avoid testing with a steam and 20 hydronic so I don't have to add cost to the majority - 21 - to most of my product that I sell in this particular 22 line to increase the efficiency to overcome the loss

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 179 1 of the extra coil. 2 My alternative is I increase the cost of my 3 whole product -- of my product model line or I add an 4 electric heat option that has not been required by the 5 market up to this point. 6 MR. SACHS: With the understanding that it 7 will never be sold? 8 MR. WHITWELL: Right. Exactly. So. 9 MR. AMRANE: Could this be, for example, 10 another product class, group that within -- with the 11 product test with gas heat where you'll have it deduct 12 -- .2 EER deduct for the performance of the unit, for 13 example? 14 MR. WHITWELL: Could be another approach. 15 Or actually, that's a good point. Perhaps I'm not 16 thinking about this correctly. Maybe we should -- 17 this is counted as gas heat or other, so I get the 18 lower efficiency standard with the hydronic or steam 19 heat coil. Which helps. 20 MR. EISNER: Other comments? 21 MR. WHITWELL: But I don't -- yeah, I don't 22 have an alternative.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 180 1 MS. BARHYDT: You can't build on something 2 with (inaudible). 3 MR. WHITWELL: No. 4 MR. AMRANE: So maybe this is a nonissue if 5 indeed it's part of that product class category, 6 because then it will be subject to .2 EER deduction 7 anyway. Maybe it's a nonissue. 8 MR. WHITWELL: Yeah, I have to look at it to 9 see if the .2 EER deduct is enough to offset the coil. 10 MR. STANONIK: Frank Stanonik of AHRI. 11 Maybe when you correct the description you can include 12 something in there about that. The description was 13 wrong the last time and it's still not fixed. 14 MS. ARMSTRONG: I wasn't here. What was the 15 description that you wanted to use? 16 MR. STANONICK: Oh, I don't remember that we 17 had one, I just noted that I don't -- I didn't write 18 that down, I just noted that it was pointed out that 19 description was not really describing steam hydronic 20 heat options. Somebody must have given a correction, 21 but I don't -- I didn't write it down. 22 FEMALE SPEAKER: We haven't gotten all of

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 181 1 our transcripts back yet. 2 MR. STANONIK: In any case, when you do that 3 maybe you can put in that this should be considered 4 equivalent to the gas heat option or whatever you're 5 describing. 6 MR. WHITWELL: Yeah, I think that's a good 7 point. It would be considered as part of the gas heat 8 or other product class. 9 MR. STEM: This is Mike Stem with Intertek. 10 I've just got one comment to maybe ease Harvey's heart 11 burn. He's told me about the representative of the 12 resistance for the coil, heating coil. In all the 13 standards, there's the static table that would 14 simulate. So, assuming that was considered as part of 15 that coming up with the standards. 16 MR. AMRANE: Not with the gas -- 17 MR. STEM: Not with the -- 18 MR. AMRANE: Not for the -- 19 MR. STEM: -- yeah, but if we have an 20 electric heat kit that's added to the blower furnace 21 now. How's that handled right now? 22 MS. BARHYDT: Say it again. I'm sorry.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 182 1 MR. STEM: Say, if you have an electric heat 2 kit right now that's added to a coil blower assembly, 3 how is that handled right now? 4 MR. WHITWELL: It's tested. 5 MS. HOOTMAN: It's tested. 6 MR. STEM: It's tested with it? 7 MR. WHITWELL: Yeah. Part of the internal 8 static pressure process. 9 MR. STEM: Okay. 10 MR. EISNER: So, other questions? Frank? 11 MR. STANONIK: I just want to answer the 12 question. Actually, the description on the handout 13 from the -- it's dated June 7th, it's actually Slide 14 13, is a description. 15 MS. ARMSTRONG: What is it? 16 MR. STANONIK: "Heat exchanger located 17 inside the equipment that heats the equipment supply 18 or outdoor area using the heat delivered by steam or 19 hot water." 20 MS. ARMSTRONG: Okay. We'll get that one. 21 MR. CYMBALSKY: June 7th handout. 22 MS. ARMSTRONG: Thank you.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 183 1 MR. EISNER: Any other comments, concerns? 2 So you're adding the correct definition. 3 Does everybody have any objections? And do we have 4 any abstentions? Karim? 5 MR. AMRANE: I think before -- I think this 6 issue maybe you guys should looked at the current 7 regulations and see whether this will fit within the 8 gas heat product classes because if that's the case 9 then I don't think that probably, I don't know maybe 10 Bob will have to check with the .2, but whether it's 11 enough, I don't know, that might not be an issue. 12 MR. WHITWELL: Yeah, I don't know. I'd have 13 to look at it. But that would certainly help. 14 MS. ARMSTRONG: It's on the table; it says 15 "all other types of heating." It would qualify for 16 the points there. 17 MR. WHITWELL: Okay, thanks. 18 MR. AMRANE: So maybe this one we can come 19 back later, because it's not an issue we can remove it 20 altogether. 21 MS. ARMSTRONG: So, can we vote on it and 22 then if we need to bring it back up, you can bring it

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 184 1 back up tomorrow or at the next meeting? Is that 2 okay? 3 MR. EISNER: Okay. Any objections? Any 4 abstentions? 5 MR. SACHS: I'm going to abstain on this. 6 MR. EISNER: Anyone else? 7 Let's go on to the next issue. 8 MS. BARHYDT: Hot Gas Reheat. The heat 9 exchanger located downstream of the indoor coil that 10 heats the supplied air during cooling operation, using 11 high pressure refrigerant in order to increase the 12 ratio of moisture cooling to cooling capacity provided 13 by the equipment. 14 DOE would issue enforcement guidance that a 15 unit with hot gas reheat would not be tested. 16 However, an otherwise identical unit must be available 17 for testing. 18 MR. EISNER: Any comments or questions? Any 19 objections? Any abstentions? 20 Okay. I got three no's. On to the next. 21 MS. BARHYDT: Barometric relief. An 22 assembly with dampers and means to automatically set

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 185 1 the damper position in a closed position and one or 2 more open positions, to allow venting directly to the 3 outside portion of the building air that is returning 4 to the unit, rather than allowing it to re-circulate 5 to the indoor coil and back to the building. 6 DOE would issue testing guidance indicating 7 that dampers would be fully sealed during the test. 8 The other two features, a fan that transfers 9 - - a powered exhaust is a fan that transfers directly 10 to the outside portion of the building air that is 11 returning to the unit, rather than allowing it to re12 circulate to the indoor coil and back to the building. 13 And powered return air is a fan that draws building 14 air into the equipment. 15 And for powered return air and powered 16 exhaust, DOE would issue enforcement guidance 17 indicating DOE would not test units with powered 18 return air, powered exhaust, so long as an otherwise 19 identical unit is available for test. 20 MR. EISNER: Any comments or questions? Any 21 objections? Any abstentions? 22 All right. We're in agreement. Next issue.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 186 1 MS. BARHYDT: Fresh Air Dampers. An 2 assembly with dampers and mains to set the damper and 3 in a closed and one open position to allow area to be 4 drawn into the equipment when the indoor fan is 5 operating. 6 DOE will issue test procedure guidance 7 indicating that dampers would be fully sealed for 8 testing. 9 MR. EISNER: Any questions or concerns? Any 10 objections? Any abstentions? 11 We are in agreement. Next issue. 12 MS. BARHYDT: High Efficiency Air 13 Filtration. An assembly of air filters and filter 14 brackets or racks that provides greater air filtration 15 than the air filtration assembly available for sale 16 with the equipment that provides the lowest air 17 filtration -- that doesn't look like what we discussed 18 last time. Is it? 19 MS. HOOTMAN: No. It's not -- I'm agreeing 20 with you, it does not look like -- 21 MS. BARHYDT: Oh, okay. It does not look 22 like what we discussed last time.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 187 1 MR. THARP: The AHRI Unitary Large Equipment 2 Engineering committee met on -- and discussed air 3 filtration. And the position that they're taking at 4 this point is that if the unit has the capability for 5 factory or installed air filters, than the filters 6 shall be installed during the test. If the type of 7 filter is optional and no standard filter is supplied, 8 then 0.08 inches of water column static pressure shall 9 be added to the discharge static pressure or do 10 another test. 11 MS. ARMSTRONG: Okay. But -- 12 MR. THARP: So, our suggestion -- 13 MS. ARMSTRONG: -- the caveat is going to be 14 that's going to require a test procedure rule. That's 15 not a quick solution. 16 MS. HOOTMAN: I know. 17 MS. ARMSTRONG: Okay. So, as long as we 18 realize that in the interim we're left with status quo 19 of today. 20 MS. HOOTMAN: Well, why couldn't you put 21 that in as guidance, that you would insist that it be 22 tested or added -- or the pressure drop be added? You

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 188 1 know, be tested with -- 2 MS. ARMSTRONG: I can't do other guidance. 3 It'll never get out of the law side of our shop. 4 MR. WHITWELL: Could it say that DOE will 5 test with the manufacturer's standard filter? Because 6 I know for us anyway, we have what we call a standard 7 in our catalog and then we have the higher efficiency 8 options. And I assume that most manufacturers would 9 have the same. 10 MS. HOOTMAN: I think Bob, at the ULE 11 meeting there were some manufacturers saying they ship 12 without filters. 13 MR. WHITWELL: Oh, okay. 14 MS. HOOTMAN: So, they would test it 15 without. 16 MR. WHITWELL: Yeah, I wasn't at the ULE 17 meeting. 18 MS. HOOTMAN: So, they ship without, so the 19 problem became -- and that's why we were putting back 20 in the .8 inches in there so that everyone was at the 21 same playing tilt, right? 22 MR. WHITWELL: Yeah.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 189 1 MS. HOOTMAN: So that becomes the problem, 2 if it's shipped without -- 3 MR. WHITWELL: Right. I understand. But if 4 it's shipped without, the manufacturer still would 5 have a standard filter most likely; right? I don't 6 know if that was part of the discussion at the ULE 7 meeting. Dick was there, but I haven't caught up with 8 him. 9 MS. HOOTMAN: I don't really recall that. 10 So, I was there, but I mean, we didn't go in to 11 everybody's specifics. 12 MR. FLY: So, state your question again, 13 because I didn't catch what you said. 14 MR. WHITWELL: So, would everybody -- even 15 manufacturers that don't ship with a filter, would 16 they have, in their literature, something that would 17 be described as their standard or their -- a standard 18 filter? 19 MR. FLY: I don't think that came up. 20 MS. HOOTMAN: Yeah, it didn't. It didn't 21 come up in that light. 22 MR. SACHS: I very much endorse Jill's

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 190 1 thought that if this requires a rulemaking that it's 2 worth doing. On the other hand, I'm quite 3 uncomfortable with using air filtration policy 4 standard as an efficiency parameter, instead of a 5 pressure drop. 6 MS. HOOTMAN: I do, too. 7 MR. SACHS: My gut reaction is that .08 8 sounds awful low to me, so I'd like to see some 9 literature. And my sense is that we ought to at least 10 be thinking about a) capacity dependence for that 11 static pressure, and b) making sure that we're not 12 setting up a test procedure that gives results that 13 would not be sort of the default for people trying to 14 decide compliance with 62.1 and similar indoor 15 environmental quality standards. 16 MR. FLY: This is Mark Fly with AAON. 17 Harvey, just to kind of give you a clue as to what was 18 discussed, at least at the ULE meeting, you know, the 19 .08 was a standard that came out of the residential 20 equipment standard, or small equipment standard and 21 which is usually equipment with eight coils in it. 22 So, the area of the coil versus the area of the filter

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 191 1 on those units is usually a lot smaller than it is on 2 commercial equipment, which is usually a flat pin 3 coil. 4 So, we actually have bigger filter areas in 5 commercial equipment. We also tend to put better 6 filtration in some of them, but you know, for a 7 standard that's kind of where we got to. And at least 8 that group felt that the .08 was a reasonable number 9 still, even with slightly higher filtration standards. 10 But I don't have any data to give you. 11 MR. THARP: Harvey, this is Rusty. I'll 12 throw in, reading an email that was sent to me. "Our 13 product line offers angle filters that have clean air 14 pressure routes ranging from 0.03 to 0.09 inches and 15 HRI air quality across MERV 6 filters." 16 MR. SACHS: Well, this is very helpful. I 17 think that we're all in agreement that with a 18 rulemaking we have the ability to explore what the 19 appropriate relationships are. And all the external 20 factors range from 360 to 62.1. Thank you. So we're 21 in agreement. 22 MS. HOOTMAN: So, back to the Department,

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 192 1 knowing -- there are many things that we're going to 2 change about the Unitary 343-60 and hopefully shortly 3 going to get those done and it'll be published. You 4 know, and I realize you're going to have to go through 5 a rulemaking on that, but in the meantime, do we need 6 to be putting words in about that? 7 MS. ARMSTRONG: The answer's yes. It 8 changes the way the current test procedure is 9 currently implemented. Then yes. The key here is 10 through guidance, which we can do really quickly, we 11 can only clarify the existing language, we cannot 12 completely change or come up with requirements, that 13 requires a rule. 14 Now, but that being said, we can kick off a 15 rule tomorrow and try to see how quickly we can do it. 16 MR. FLY: And the ULE Engineering Committee 17 is diligently trying to get the latest -- their test 18 standard up to date, so no you can't kick it off 19 tomorrow, because we're not done yet. We're trying to 20 get there just as quickly as we can, knowing that this 21 is coming. 22 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah, I will encourage --

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 193 1 there's a variety of things that we've gone through 2 here that we've said we'll accept guidance on that the 3 Department would probably handle differently in a test 4 procedure, if we had a full blown open rule. So, and 5 we do plan to do it differently in the next rule that 6 comes up. 7 MS. JAKOBS: So, this is Diane Jakobs from 8 Rheem. And the fact that we're using the word "high" 9 doesn't that imply that there's a standard version? 10 So, we're just saying the Department would purchase, 11 if there was an option for a air filtration, the 12 Department would choose the less option. So, I would 13 take out the 6 MERV part and say that you would select 14 a standard filter as opposed to a high efficiency 15 filter. I'm not sure I'm talking into the microphone. 16 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah, I mean, so I wasn't at 17 the last discussion, but the initial discussion was 18 what's a standard. And standard is something 19 different across different manufacturers, so there was 20 some concern that standard be uniform. If that 21 concern has been alleviated and we're okay with just 22 standard, I don't know what the Department's position

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 194 1 is, I'd have to think about it for a minute, but if 2 we're okay with standard being whatever is shipped 3 with the unit, and if it's not shipped with the unit I 4 do think there needs to be a default. And the 5 default, unfortunately, can't be a correction factor 6 at this point in time, but that can be our goal. 7 MR. WHITWELL: I'd be willing to supply the 8 default filters for any other manufacturers. 9 MS. MEYERS: So, could you say short term, 10 if she has procedure guidance, the unit will be tested 11 with no filter or the manufacturer's stated standard 12 filter? We all state what our -- I mean, it's an 13 option in the nomenclature that it's no filter or the 14 standard filter or whatever. So, testing the unit, 15 you know, standard filter may be different for every 16 manufacturer, but I think that's okay. 17 MR. WHITWELL: I mean, I don't know what the 18 alternative is at this point. Right? If we can't put 19 an alternative in there, what's the alternative? 20 MS. ARMSTRONG: And -- 21 MR. THARP: Let me throw out one idea here. 22 If you can't -- the test procedure says to test per

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 195 1 the IO. Correct? If the manufacturer's IO, we all 2 say something about air filters and keeping air 3 filters clean, so therefore if you issue a test 4 procedure guidance that says a certain filter pressure 5 drop, like we have, then you're just giving -- the 6 position would be that you're giving a guidance off of 7 a manufacturer recommendation. So, you aren't really 8 changing the test procedure. 9 MS. HOOTMAN: We can do that. I mean, we 10 could clarify that. 11 MR. WHITWELL: Just another option is until 12 we can get the test procedure in there to add use of 13 the filter its shipped with or the .08, maybe the way 14 to level the playing field is to test with no filter. 15 MR. KOJACK: This is Mike Kojack with UL. 16 I'm kind of getting confused what we're talking about, 17 because isn't it we test with the filter shipped with 18 the unit? If not shipped with the unit it should say 19 in the instruction manual what filter should be there. 20 And if it's not in the instructions why can't you just 21 contact the manufacturer to find out what the standard 22 filter is and then purchase it and test it?

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 196 1 MS. HOOTMAN: We were doing well until we 2 get that last point. 3 MR. WHITWELL: Actually about could there be 4 guidance in here that the manufacturer provides in the 5 PDF that we provide as part of the certification, what 6 the standard filter should be that's used for testing? 7 MR. KOJACK: Because that's what we were 8 saying before, for the third party test labs, if 9 there's any pertinent information the third party test 10 lab needs to kind of in order to test the unit, it 11 should be there, so maybe that should be in there. If 12 they're shipped with no filter, at least that's 13 implied. 14 MS. ARMSTRONG: I'm going to play devil's 15 advocate for a minute. So, a couple things. One is, 16 I think if it's in the I&O manual, if it says what 17 kind of filter is there, if it's shipped with a 18 standard filter, those are not the issues. It's what 19 if you have no information, that's the issue. 20 And just calling up the manufacturer, we've 21 already just -- we will talk about the process for 22 potentially verification testing, but we've already

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 197 1 gone through some of it where you're not just going to 2 be calling up the manufacturer. 3 MR. KOJACK: Well, I -- 4 MS. ARMSTRONG: So, we're trying to 5 alleviate as much of that -- 6 MR. KOJACK: -- probably said that I meant 7 you guys and you kind of -- 8 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah, but we're trying to 9 alleviate as much of that as possible. 10 To your point, yes, we could do that, but 11 you're not -- right now, you don't have to certify 12 until December 31st. And in theory, you know, at 13 least we wouldn't have that information available. 14 And I'm not saying we need it now, but I assume that 15 there needs to be some type of interim solution. I 16 don't know. 17 I will say, if your I&O manual is different 18 than the instructions you upload, we're going to have 19 some issues. 20 MR. WHITWELL: You mean the instructions in 21 the PDF? 22 MS. MEYERS: Then I think I agree with Bob.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 198 1 I mean, it should be that we test with no filter. 2 MR. WHITWELL: In the interim. 3 MS. MEYERS: In the interim. 4 MR. WHITWELL: I'm not necessarily 5 recommending that, but I don't understand what 6 alternatives we have. 7 MS. ARMSTRONG: Well, I mean, we can write 8 language and say we test with the filters shipped or 9 the test lab must purchase a filter that meets the 10 specifications in the I&O. It's just that if it's 11 not, what do we do? 12 And I don't understand why can't we say, if 13 there's not one specified, if it's not shipped with 14 the unit, you must -- the standard filter is X. 15 MR. WHITWELL: I think because the issue is 16 if we're going to specify a filter we're either going 17 to specify a filter with a certain pressure drop, 18 which is what we want? Or a MERV rating. 19 MS. ARMSTRONG: But if you want something 20 specifically for a given unit's performance, why 21 wouldn't you put it in your I&O or ship it with the 22 unit? I mean --

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 199 1 MR. WHITWELL: We would ship a filter with 2 the unit. 3 MS. ARMSTRONG: So, then there would be no 4 issue, you would never get to that case. It's if you 5 don't. 6 MR. WHITWELL: I'm not worried about our -- 7 I mean, we have standard filters that we would ship 8 with the filter, but I understand there's some 9 manufacturers that don't ship filters with the unit. 10 So, we need to have something for that; right? 11 MR. AMRANE: Is Karim with AHRI. What's 12 wrong with just putting the default pressure drop? 13 You could test at 0.08. 14 MS. HOOTMAN: Because that's changing the 15 test statement; right? 16 MR. WHITWELL: Yeah. We can't do that. 17 MS. HOOTMAN: Changing the test statement. 18 MR. AMRANE: Yeah, eventually. Right. 19 MS. ARMSTRONG: Right. I mean, that's the 20 goal. 21 MR. AMRANE: That's the goal. 22 MS. ARMSTRONG: We got that. We all agree

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 200 1 on the goal? 2 MR. AMRANE: Yeah. 3 MS. MEYERS: Well, but you're trying to 4 define the X, as you said. And the X could be a 5 pressure drop of .08. I mean, that's just what you 6 said you wanted to do. 7 MR. SACHS: This is Harvey. The term 8 "nuclear option" was (inaudible) yesterday or the day 9 before. It's just a reminder that there are a few of 10 these issues, to my present one, that might just be 11 amenable to wrapping up the package and sending it 12 over to the Hill, where they're so fast and responsive 13 nowadays. No, it's a parallel path, but I think it is 14 something to be kept in mind, the things that are 15 purely technical, where there is consensus coming from 16 those here. 17 MS. MEYERS: I think the issue all the 18 manufacturers have agreed to the unit will be tested 19 with a manufacturer's standard air filter. In a case 20 where an air filter is not shipped with the unit, a 21 pressure drop of .08 will be applied. So, you've got 22 the industry's buy-in on that, and that's better than

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 201 1 - - the MERV rating a pressure drop -- there is no 2 pressure dropped assigned with the MERV rating. So, I 3 think that's the solution. 4 MS. HOOTMAN: You know, and to add on to 5 that, I mean, we can't just tell you, test with a Farr 6 (ph) 3030 such and such and such and such, because in 7 each unit it's going to be different. 8 MS. ARMSTRONG: I get it. And I would just 9

-- 10 MS. HOOTMAN: So, that's the hard thing. 11 MS. ARMSTRONG: -- no, and I get it. So, 12 that's why I'm trying to write language where this is 13 the anomaly, right? If you guys have a specific 14 performance that you're trying to achieve with a given 15 filter, a certain pressure drop that you expect to get 16 your rated conditions, that you've gone so far as to 17 ship the unit with it or put it in your I&O. If you 18 care that much about hitting that pressure drop to 19 your performance, then you've taken care of one and 20 two, and you never get to three. 21 MR. WHITWELL: Our literature is going to -- 22 not going to say that is the filter to meet the test

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 202 1 performance per the test standard; right? But we are 2 going to have what would be the nominal or the 3 standard filter and then there are higher filtration 4 options. 5 MS. ARMSTRONG: And that's what we would be 6 testing. I mean, really this just becomes an issue if 7 you say nothing. 8 MS. MEYERS: If what? 9 MS. ARMSTRONG: You say or do nothing. We 10 can put in the .08, I can't promise you that it's 11 going to come out that way. I understand that that's 12 the goal, but if you intend -- if your unit so close 13 to rated -- or the standard at rated conditions that 14 you need a specific pressure drop, using a specific 15 filter, then - 16 - 17 MS. HOOTMAN: Put it in. 18 MS. ARMSTRONG: Put it in. Make it 19 specific. 20 MR. WHITWELL: Sorry, one more question or 21 comment. So, you're talking about the I&O which I 22 guess is Installation and Operations Manual. I'm not

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 203 1 sure our filter options are listed in there. They 2 would be listed in the product catalog; right? So -- 3 MR. THARP: And going back to this is -- 4 part of the reason for the description of this title 5 is some manufacturers have filtration as an option. 6 So, I just want to make sure it's clear that if an 7 optional high efficiency MERV 16 filter is installed 8 in the unit and is acquired for testing, then do you 9 take out the MERV 16 and put in the standard filter or 10 whatever it was? 11 MS. BARHYDT: That's what that says. 12 MS. MEYERS: So, just one more question. 13 So, why couldn't we just say test it without a filter, 14 since the filter's not part of the test procedure? 15 Because there are cases where you don't ship a filter, 16 especially if the external filter rack is supposed to 17 be supplied at the jobsite or whatever. So, there are 18 those options where it's not -- what you don't want to 19 do is get in a situation where you ship the filter and 20 on some of our units we don't, because they just throw 21 them away. 22 MR. WHITWELL: But --

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 204 1 MS. ARMSTRONG: But at the end of the day 2 there's always some type of filter in that system. 3 MR. WHITWELL: But I think -- 4 MS. MEYERS: Why? 5 MS. ARMSTRONG: So, why shouldn't they be 6 tested with one? 7 MS. MEYERS: But it's not always under the 8 manufacturer's control. I mean, we may not ship it 9 with one. That's what I'm saying. 10 MS. ARMSTRONG: Your unit is operating with 11 one. 12 MR. THARP: And it may not even get 13 installed in the manufacturer's position. 14 MR. WHITWELL: But the case of where a 15 unit's tested, DOE is going to order, or someone's 16 going to order a unit for DOE. And whoever does that 17 would specify a standard filter; right? 18 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yes. 19 MR. WHITWELL: So, that -- Karen, in that 20 case you would supply a filter, right? Or you could 21 supply -- 22 MS. MEYERS: Well, I mean, sometimes the

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 205 1 filters not even going in my product. 2 MR. WHITWELL: With some customers you don't 3 ship it, a filter in the unit, is what you're saying? 4 MS. MEYERS: Um hmm. 5 MR. WHITWELL: Or you just don't have a 6 filter for some products? 7 MS. MEYERS: Well, there are pieces where 8 the job might call for some type of external filter 9 that I don't manufacture. 10 MR. WHITWELL: Right. But I think in the 11 case that we're speaking about here, DOE is going to 12 order a unit and they're going to ask for the standard 13 filter from your literature. So, there shouldn't be a 14 unit -- you shouldn't ship a unit without a filter in 15 this case, because it's specified. I think; right? 16 MS. MEYERS: It is specified by the test 17 procedure? 18 MR. WHITWELL: Well, no. I think DOE would 19 ensure that when they order the unit that they specify 20 that they need the standard filter. 21 MS. MEYERS: Well, why does DOE need the 22 standard filter if it's not specified in the test

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 206 1 procedure? That's my question. I mean, you've made 2 all these other statements that you -- you know, the 3 test procedure doesn't allow for that, we can't do 4 that test procedure because -- well, in this case, the 5 test procedure doesn't allow for this, but you're -- 6 you know, so you're kind of -- 7 MS. ARMSTRONG: But it's set up per your 8 I&O. To the extent you have -- or per manufacturer's 9 instructions. To the extent you have instructions of 10 a filter to use, that is what we're talking about 11 here. And we're trying to find what a standard filter 12 is. The question becomes, if there's no -- what the 13 equitable position if there's no manufacturer 14 instructions, period, on filter use. 15 MR. SACHS: And Karen, I'd like to go back 16 to your question, why should it be tested with a 17 filter of any kind. I'm personally concerned about 18 it, not in terms of the filter, but in terms of the 19 effect of changing the static pressure, land flow -- 20 the air flow, not only on efficiency, but also on SHR. 21 And I'm probably over sensitive from my experience 22 with residential product where the default static

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 207 1 pressures are so far (inaudible) field experience 2 we've all been around that tree a number of times, but 3 it just seems to me that where it's feasible we really 4 want the rating method to come close to what the 5 product's supposed to do. So, that's my prejudice; 6 John, I think, tell me if I'm wrong. 7 MS. JAKOBS: But I just think that it's part 8 of the test procedure discussion. We're not change 9 the test procedure and it doesn't require a filter as 10 part of the test procedure, then we can't impose a 11 filter. Right? 12 MR. KOJACK: How about this. You know, 13 since you're going to be working on changing the test 14 procedure in the future to allow for testing with no 15 filters, with a pressure drop penalty, how about for 16 right now just have it say, you test with the filter 17 that was shipped. If it's not shipped, you test with 18 the filter that's in the instruction manual. And if 19 it's not in there, you test it with no filter. And 20 the manufacturers that are actually doing it that way, 21 when you change the rule -- the testing procedure, 22 they're the ones that are going to be affected the

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 208 1 most, because then they're going to have to change 2 their ratings if their rating with no filter 3 whatsoever and you're going to impose a point of 4 weight or whatever pressure drop on it, their ratings 5 are going to be changed then, if they're not ever 6 testing with anyone filtration in the first place. 7 So, it's going to kind of force them to want 8 to test with filters because it's going to be changed 9 to that anyway. 10 MR. AMRANE: As far as AHRI is concerned, 11 we're going to make a change to the standard right 12 now. We're going to stop doing -- we're going to do it 13 right away, so we're going to do whatever the standard 14 you're saying, which is just the filter that comes 15 with it or we're going to use default pressure. But 16 as far as AHRI is concerned, we're going to start 17 implementing this right away. So, I see no problem 18 with DOE adding this (inaudible). Now, whether we can 19 do it or not, I don't know. 20 MALE SPEAKER: The lawyers will make the 21 decision. 22 MS. ARMSTRONG: Technically, whether you can

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 209 1 do it or not, it can't be inconsistent with our test 2 procedure. So, that's what we're trying to avoid, 3 right? We're all in the -- just for now go forward 4 with this. I don't know what we're going to do for 5 something that's not shipped with one or not, but at 6 least we can agree to the first two provisions. 7 MR. MYERS: Frank Myers. Two points. One, 8 in the second bullet where it was changed from I&O or 9 whatever you were calling it for the instruction 10 manual to product catalog, shouldn't it be both? You 11 know, wherever you find it, either in the product 12 catalog or the instruction manual? 13 MS. HOOTMAN: Just put manufacturer's 14 literature. 15 MR. MYERS: Because it could be in either 16 place. 17 MS. HOOTMAN: Just put manufacturer's 18 literature. 19 MR. MYERS: And then the second one, I've 20 been listening to all of the discussion and maybe I 21 missed it, Ashley suggested that there was a default 22 filter instead of the 08. I assume that's because the

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 210 1 legal aspect that you're allowed to stipulate a filter 2 now while we're trying to get the -- is that why you 3 were proposing that? 4 MS. ARMSTRONG: I'm just going to say, take 5 out the situation where there's nothing and let's 6 decline to say anything about that at this point in 7 time, and let's vote on the other two. 8 MR. MYERS: Okay. Well, where I was going 9 and the reason for asking the question, Ashley, was 10 perhaps -- I never heard the question posed to the 11 group, let's go for the 08 on a change to the test 12 procedure and in the interim you have -- and I know 13 it's not equivalent, but if it would satisfy DOE, if 14 you have nothing in there you do a MERV 3 or a MERV 4. 15 MS. HOOTMAN: I can pick a MERV 3 that has a 16 .1, I could pick a MERV 3 that has a .5, I can pick -- 17 you can -- 18 MR. MYERS: So, you could be more than the - 19

- 20 MS. HOOTMAN: Oh, yeah. The MERV has 21 nothing to do with its pressure drop. 22 MR. MYERS: I heard that, but I was not

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 211 1 aware that you could (inaudible) -- 2 MS. HOOTMAN: Oh, yeah. 3 MR. MYERS: -- above that. 4 MS. HOOTMAN: For my -- for the exact same 5 unit. 6 MR. MYERS: Is there a lower MERV that would 7 never go over the proposed level? 8 MS. HOOTMAN: No. When you look at their 9 face areas and -- 10 MR. MYERS: Okay. 11 MS. HOOTMAN: -- filter manufacturers, there 12 is nobody the same. 13 MR. EISNER: Anything else? You want to 14 vote? 15 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yes. 16 MR. EISNER: All right. Anybody opposed to 17 the language up on the board? Anybody abstain? 18 Okay. 19 MR. MYERS: Just quickly before we leave 20 that, I know we voted, but in some other places when 21 we were doing work a month ago, we put in a notation 22 that a rulemaking would be implemented to achieve some

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 212 1 goal. I don't know if you wanted to put that in as a 2 note here. It seemed like there was general agreement 3 that's what we wanted to do, so it might be a good 4 place to put some notation that that's the objective. 5 MS. ARMSTRONG: I mean, I think that's 6 generally true for like 75 percent of this stuff, if 7 not all, honestly. I think the guidance option for 8 the Department is temporary. 9 MR. EISNER: Okay. Do we want to take a 10 break or do we want to go into this. It's 3:30? 11 MR. THARP: We're not too far from finishing 12 HVAC are we? 13 MS. ARMSTRONG: I hope not. Let's finish 14 HVAC, I guess. I don't think there's anything that's 15 controversial, except for the last one. 16 MS. BARHYDT: Hot gas bypass. A method to 17 adjust the cooling delivered by the equipment in which 18 some portion of the hot, high pressure refrigerant 19 from the discharge of the compressors is diverted from 20 its normal flow to the outdoor coil and is instead 21 allowed to enter the indoor coil to modulate the 22 capacity of a refrigeration circuit, or to prevent

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 213 1 evaporator coil freezing. 2 DOE would issue enforcement guidance 3 indicating that units with hot gas bypass will not be 4 tested, however an otherwise identical unit must be 5 available for test. And this would be revisited in 6 the case of a switch to a part load metric. 7 MR. EISNER: Any comments? Questions? Any 8 objections? Any abstentions? 9 In agreement. Next issue. 10 MS. BARHYDT: Sound traps, sound 11 attenuators. An assembly and structures through which 12 the supply air passes before leaving the equipment or 13 through which the return air from the building passes 14 immediately after entering the equipment for which the 15 sound insertion loss is at least six decibels toward 16 the 125 hertz octave band frequency range. 17 Issue enforcement guidance indicating that 18 units with sound traps will not be tested, however any 19 otherwise identical unit must be available for test. 20 MR. EISNER: Any questions or concerns? Any 21 abstentions? Any problems? Harvey's not here? 22 MR. CYMBALSKY: Yeah, you get to ram it all

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 214 1 through. 2 MR. EISNER: Okay. Next issue. 3 MS. BARHYDT: Fire, Smoke, Isolation 4 Dampers. A damper assembly including a means to open 5 and close the damper, mounted at the supply or return 6 duct opening of the equipment. Such a damper may be 7 rated by an appropriate test laboratory, according to 8 the appropriate safety standards, such as UL555 or 9 UL555-S. 10 DOE would issue enforcement guidance 11 indicating that units with fire, smoke, isolation 12 dampers will not be tested, however an otherwise 13 identical unit must be available for test. 14 MR. EISNER: Any concerns or questions? Any 15 objections? Any abstentions? Okay. We're in 16 agreement. Next issue. 17 MS. BARHYDT: UV lights. A lighting fixture 18 and lamp mounted so that it shines light on the indoor 19 coil that emits ultraviolet light shall inhibit growth 20 of organisms on the indoor coil surfaces, the 21 condensate drip pan and other locations within the 22 equipment.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 215 1 DOE will issue test procedure guidance that 2 UV lights do not need to be turned on for test. 3 MR. EISNER: Any questions or comments? 4 Quick, before Harvey gets back. Does 5 anybody have any objections? Any abstentions? 6 Okay. Next issue. 7 MS. BARHYDT: High static indoor blowers, 8 oversized motors. An indoor fan assembly including a 9 motor that drives the fan that can deliver higher 10 external static pressure than the standard indoor fan 11 assembly sold with the equipment. 12 DOE's view is that all motors offered for 13 sale as options within a given basic model shall have 14 the same relative efficiency perform as the motor 15 included in the base unit. A motor of the same 16 relative performance as the base motor shall exhibit 17 the same percent lower losses from those permitted 18 under the prevailing federal efficiency standard as 19 the base motor. 20 For example, if the base motor has ten 21 percent lower losses than permitted by the federal 22 standard, all models in the group shall also use

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 216 1 motors that have at least ten percent lower losses 2 than the federal standard. 3 MR. EISNER: Okay. Comments? Questions? 4 MR. WHITWELL: I'm not sure I understand. 5 So, the federal standard, there's a table in there by 6 horsepower for general purpose motors that has the 7 minimum efficiency level. Right? So, is this saying 8 that if your base motor is ten points higher than 9 what's in there, then all of your higher horsepower 10 motors must also exceed the minimums by ten points 11 efficiency? 12 MR. RIVEST: So, the NEMA people have 13 trained me to no longer think in terms of efficiencies 14 when we're dealing with 95 percent, but to think in 15 terms of losses. And so, the idea is that we're 16 trying to avoid the situation where a manufacturer 17 could use an extremely efficient motor in their base 18 design and then in their other designs that are not 19 tested, use a less efficient motor. Right? 20 So, if you were to use the minimum E-PAC 21 (ph) level for all motors, so it's a level playing 22 field. But the efficiency isn't the same at five

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 217 1 horsepower as ten horsepower for the impact standards. 2 The bigger they are in horsepower the more efficient 3 they are. 4 MR. WHITWELL: Right. I understand that. 5 MR. RIVEST: So, the idea is just to 6 normalize to say, if you have ten percent fewer losses 7 on your five horsepower federal standard, if you use a 8 ten horsepower, that motor should also have ten 9 percent fewer losses than the minimum. So, it's a way 10 of describing relative efficiency. 11 MR. WHITWELL: So, what is the minimum 12 efficiency that is regulated here? What is the -- or 13 I mean, sorry, the minimum horsepower size that's 14 regulated? 15 MR. RIVEST: Federal regulations cover every 16 horsepower, from fractional to probably 200. 17 MR. WHITWELL: So, where do the current 18 standards start? 19 MR. THARP: One. 20 MR. RIVEST: Yeah, you're looking at one. 21 Sorry, three phase more. 22 MR. THARP: This is three phase? For what

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 218 1 efficiency -- 2 MR. RIVEST: That's fine. 3 MR. THARP: -- general purpose electric 4 motors a five horsepower, six pole has a minimum 5 efficiency of 89.5. So, that has 10.5 percent losses. 6 So, therefore if I have a motor that's -- my base 7 model is 10 percent less losses, that motor would be 8 efficiency of 90.6, my five horsepower. So, that 9 means that for my ten horsepower version, the minimum 10 efficiency is 91.7, which is 8.3 percent losses and so 11 I'd have to have ten percent less losses or that motor 12 would have to be 92.5 percent. 13 MS. ARMSTRONG: You got it. 14 MR. WHITWELL: And where's this data, the 15 minimum efficiencies? 16 MS. ARMSTRONG: CFR. 17 MR. WHITWELL: CFR -- 18 MR. THARP: 31.25. 19 MR. WHITWELL: Right. So, that goes -- 20 what's the minimum horsepower size that's in there? 21 MALE SPEAKER: One horsepower -- three 22 quarter.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 219 1 MR. WHITWELL: Three quarter. 2 MR. THARP: One horsepower. 3 MR. WHITWELL: So, and those are general 4 purpose motors? There are definitely -- sometimes I 5 think definite purpose motors are used, which are -- 6 MR. RIVEST: So, the wording is such that 7 we're not limiting you to a particular type of motors. 8 So, whatever your definite purpose or general purpose, 9 I would assume you would continue to do that. So, the 10 idea of writing it this way, as opposed to referring 11 to (inaudible) is that there are many (inaudible). 12 So, this is -- it's a concept. 13 If you're going to use an extremely 14 efficient motor to qualify your basic model, you will 15 be using a very efficient motor for everything in that 16 grouping. If you're using the federal minimum, you'd 17 use the federal minimum. 18 MR. WHITWELL: And so, I guess the other 19 thing that this is saying, if I understand the tables 20 correctly, from what I've looked at, so your higher 21 horsepower options, the motors must be higher 22 efficiency than your standard.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 220 1 MR. RIVEST: That's just the standard, the 2 way it's written. The federal standard is higher 3 efficiency requirements for the more horsepower, not 4 because it's horser engines, it just -- 5 MR. WHITWELL: Right, no, I understand. But 6 I mean, the effect is that as you -- your higher 7 static option motors or higher horsepower motors are 8 always going to be higher efficiency than your base. 9 MR. RIVEST: They're always going to be 10 higher, but the ten percent will not always be the 11 same, the percent of the higher number. 12 MR. SACHS: And the thing that strikes me 13 most about this is that it's allowing you a path to 14 use a larger motor without having to have the same 15 watts per 1,000 CFM that you had with your base motor. 16 It's saying as long as it's as much premium as the 17 base motor is, relative to the federal standard, 18 you're okay. And that seems, to me, a neat approach. 19 I'm not sure that I'm hearing what happens 20 where the base motor is, say, general purpose belt 21 driven motor and I'm using the BRF direct drive motor 22 - - I'm sorry, ECM direct drive motor instead. But it

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 221 1 seems to me that the principle is the same. 2 MR. WHITWELL: Yeah. I just need to 3 understand this, because I hadn't seen this wording 4 here. And I -- 5 MR. SACHS: Me, either. So I guess I'm just 6 quicker than you are, old man. 7 MR. WHITWELL: I guess you are. I mean, I 8 understand the concept now, okay, I just -- 9 MS. ARMSTRONG: You can sleep on it. 10 MS. HOOTMAN: Yeah, I was just going to say. 11 Can I have that exact wording overnight? You can have 12 some people look at it? 13 MS. ARMSTRONG: Right. 14 MR. RIVEST: So I wrote up a numerical 15 example, just like you did, calculating actual watts 16 with the five and the ten horsepower. I prepared a 17 little spreadsheet, so you plug in, power your base 18 motor, minimum standard efficiency, the base motor 19 efficiency as installed. And it will give you the 20 required efficiency of your horsepower. Just what you 21 did in your head, basically. 22 MR. WHITWELL: And so, are we going to get a

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 222 1 copy of this? 2 MS. ARMSTRONG: Sure. 3 MR. EISNER: Do you want to hold up voting 4 until you get a chance to think about it overnight? 5 GROUP: Yes. 6 MR. WHITWELL: So, one other question. So, 7 if a manufacturer does not meet this condition -- 8 MR. RIVEST: You can get a -- 9 MR. WHITWELL: Okay, but if -- 10 MR. RIVEST: -- standard motor -- you can 11 put an efficiency motor in your base unit, you will 12 always be able to meet it. 13 MR. WHITWELL: General purpose motor? 14 MR. RIVEST: I'm not -- it doesn't give you 15 any specific -- 16 MR. WHITWELL: Okay, but let me -- I want to 17 ask a question. So, if let's say a manufacturer does 18 not meet this condition, then those motors would be 19 subject to test. Right? Meaning those motors would 20 be subject to test? 21 MS. ARMSTRONG: That's an option. Yep. 22 MR. RIVEST: Yes.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 223 1 MR. WHITWELL: And so to Harvey's question 2 before, let's say your standard motor is a belt driven 3 general purpose motor, but you have an option for an 4 ECM motor. How do we evaluate whether that meets this 5 requirement or not? 6 MR. RIVEST: Well, we excluded motors with 7 variable frequency drives from testing. And it's 8 otherwise the same kind of motor. The ECM it's more 9 complicated because it's integrated. I think ECM 10 motors are generally more efficient, even at steady 11 state induction motors, and you should be okay. Maybe 12 the Department -- because ECMs are all so variable, 13 the motors and are very efficient in the field, it 14 might be logical just to exempt ECMs from testing. I 15 mean, just like we really encourage optimizing, we 16 might want to encourage people to use ECMs. If your 17 option's an ECM, then I don't think that should be 18 open to much criticism. Where it's an ECM base motor 19

-- 20 MR. WHITWELL: Then it's a problem. 21 MS. ARMSTRONG: Then we would -- 22 MR. RIVEST: It would be more of a problem,

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 224 1 right. But that's also what we want to avoid. We 2 want to avoid people certifying using a super 3 efficient motor and then using less efficient motors - 4

- 5 MR. WHITWELL: Yeah. Of course there's also 6 an issue where ECM motors don't always deliver the -- 7 don't always have the horsepower that's required to 8 drive more higher static applications. They're very 9 limited in their output. 10 MR. RIVEST: Right. But then it's only fair 11 that you should be able to certify ten horsepower 12 units with a five horsepower ECM, if it's not 13 available in ten horsepower. 14 MR. WHITWELL: So, ECM motors -- so it's all 15 a matter of efficiency. So, as long as we have data 16 from the manufacturer, have the motor curves that show 17 the peak efficiency is higher for our higher static 18 options then our standard, does that cover us? 19 MR. RIVEST: Higher relative to the 20 horsepower rating. 21 MR. WHITWELL: Yes. Right. Okay. Yeah. 22 MR. RIVEST: Not just immediately higher.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 225 1 MR. WHITWELL: Right, higher than relative 2 to the horsepower rating. Higher or the same relative 3 to the horsepower rating (inaudible). 4 MR. SACHS: And this may work for now, but 5 if we're starting to think about issues to put in the 6 bank for rulemaking, I think we're all cognizant that 7 it gets a whole lot more complex. That it's certainly 8 still quite easy to put a really awful fan on the 9 backend of an ECM to get rid of stinky performance. 10 MR. RIVEST: Is that John speaking? 11 MR. SACHS: There certainly are people 12 creative enough to provide that solution to their 13 customers. 14 MR. EISNER: More issues or take a break? 15 MS. ARMSTRONG: We can go to the next item? 16 Do you guys want to take a break before SPVU? 17 MS. HOOTMAN: We can. 18 MR. WHITWELL: Can you put the last slide 19 back up during the break so I can write it down? 20 MS. ARMSTRONG: Okay. 21 (Whereupon, a brief recess was taken.) 22 MR. EISNER: Okay. Next issue.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 226 1 MS. ARMSTRONG: I'll go. 2 MR. EISNER: SPVU. 3 MS. ARMSTRONG: Okay. I convinced my 4 counterpart here, that in the sake of trying to get 5 through all these things, we're not actually going to 6 read them all to you. 7 So, we had a meeting with the SPVU and crack 8 manufacturer last week, I think. And so at that time 9 we heard their explanations as to why they may want 10 certain types of options to be considered for 11 different treatment, or where clarification may be 12 needed. 13 So, you put a position on here. We're 14 hoping we can vote on these today. If we can't, 15 that's a different story, you can bring them up but 16 hopefully there's not that many surprise it them. 17 This is the basic model definition. I added 18 the question, because I wasn't sure just that cooling 19 capacity in the commercial HVAC, we had nominal, I 20 didn't know if we wanted to have some type of 21 clarifying term around cooling capacity there. 22 MR. EISNER: Any thoughts on the right term?

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 227 1 MR. THARP: These are cracks? 2 MS. ARMSTRONG: These are SPVUs. 3 MR. WINNINGHAM: This is Dave Winningham 4 from Allied Air. I think that within 1,500 BTUs is a 5 reasonable -- the nominal -- these products can go 6 from less than a ton to up to five tons. So, you may 7 get into a discussion of what's nominal. 8 MS. ARMSTRONG: Well, then let's do rating. 9 MALE SPEAKER: (Inaudible) the catalog? 10 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah, it is. 11 MR. WINNINGHAM: Yeah, and that's fine. I 12 think we would be agreeable to that. 13 MS. ARMSTRONG: Okay. Thanks. Are we ready 14 for a vote? 15 MR. EISNER: Okay. Anybody have any 16 objections? Anybody have any abstentions? 17 Okay. Features, cooper evaporator condenser 18 coil. Any questions or problems? Any objections? 19 Any abstentions? 20 Okay. Next issue is economizers. Anybody 21 have any questions or comments? Any objections? Am I 22 giving you enough time to read it?

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 228 1 MR. CYMBALSKY: These are the same as the 2 other ones. They go pretty quickly. 3 MALE SPEAKER: Go page by page to go faster? 4 They're the same? 5 MR. EISNER: Well, you've still got to write 6 in unanimous. We can go quickly, but let me let you 7 read the whole page and then we'll just go through 8 them. 9 Okay. Any objection to any of them on this 10 page? Any abstentions? 11 Okay. Unanimous for all three. 12 Coated coils, correction capacitors, hail 13 guards, why don't you read the page. 14 MR. SACHS: These are all exactly parallel? 15 MS. ARMSTRONG: No. 16 MR. CYMBALSKY: The top one is different 17 from the last set. 18 MR. AMRANE: I mean, I -- 19 MS. ARMSTRONG: Commercial HVAC is the only 20 one. 21 MR. AMRANE: Yeah, I don't see why these are 22 treated different than the larger interior products we

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 229 1 just discussed. 2 MS. ARMSTRONG: We treated them -- I mean, I 3 heard they are one to five tons; right? We treated 4 them more like those types of things. 5 MR. AMRANE: The others, the equipment, the 6 larger interior that we were just talking about, also 7 goes from one to -- 8 MS. ARMSTRONG: We can go back to that 9 position. 10 MR. AMRANE: No, I'm saying I don't 11 understand the logical behind DOE's decision. It's 12 same issue by -- it's the same thing, so why is it a 13 distinct product, one product differently from the 14 other? 15 MS. ARMSTRONG: I think it's fair to say for 16 coated coils we need an exception. Now, if we feel 17 that we should treat everything uniformly, we can go 18 back. 19 MR. AMRANE: SPVUs should be treated like 20 the other product. 21 MALE SPEAKER: Like P-TAC? 22 MS. ARMSTRONG: P-TACs are non-accepted.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 230 1 Right. 2 MR. AMRANE: I'm not talking about P-TAC; 3 those are not P-TACs. I mean, they are very different 4 than P-TAC. They're closer to the other product, the 5 large unitary, than they are for P-TAC, they're not 6 the same. I mean, SPVUs are very much like the other 7 product, so that's why I'm saying you make an 8 exception for the products, I don't see why you are 9 treating them differently. 10 MR. WINNINGHAM: I would agree with Karim's 11 comments. These are very much an applied product in a 12 rare variety of applications are much closer to the 13 commercial unitary large. 14 MR. EISNER: Okay, Wes Roan, you have a 15 comment? 16 MR. ROAN: Yes, I'd like to just agree with 17 both Karim and Dave. First of all, it's one through 18 six ton equipment in this category and also they are 19 very much like other package units, other commercial 20 units we've been talking about today. They're going 21 to react exactly the same and I think the same -- they 22 should be treated the same as the other products.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 231 1 MR. EISNER: Let's give DOE a few minutes. 2 MS. ARMSTRONG: It's okay. 3 MR. EISNER: Okay, go ahead, Harvey. 4 MR. SACHS: I guess that Karim and industry 5 are telling me that my conception of SPVU application 6 is not what I thought it was, that I have conceived 7 these as being implicitly space-constrained, small 8 unitary products that are designed for specific 9 applications such as portable classrooms, rather than 10 a general purpose product. 11 And to the extent -- and Ashley and John are 12 shaking their heads positively on that, no one else is 13 -- but to the extent to which that's true, it seems 14 that they're more P-TAC like than RTU like. Now, to 15 the extent that these are really competing in a market 16 like that for RTUs, other larger plot equipment, then 17 I'm wrong. But I sure would like to be -- see some 18 clarification about how these are actually applied. 19 MR. AMRANE: I'm going to let Dave speak 20 more about this, but the only similarity with P-TAC is 21 the space constraint part of it. Yes, you're correct 22 about space constraint. But as far as the applied

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 232 1 part of it, it's very much like the unitary large 2 product. 3 MR. SACHS: Karim, this is Harvey. It seems 4 to me that it's not just in being somewhat space 5 constrained, but also in being very much designed and 6 applied for a special purpose application. The P-TAC, 7 in my view, is the predominately a Motel 6 solution, 8 where I stay. And the small package vertical unit is 9 predominately a portable classroom, construction 10 trailer type application. It's a product for an 11 application rather than general purpose, like an RTU. 12 MR. WINNINGHAM: You know, speaking for our 13 product, it is much larger and varied than what you 14 had specifically. Single package vertical covers a 15 variety of different type of applications from that, 16 to more institutional use, to commercial buildings, to 17 the hotel industry. I mean, it covers the gamut, a 18 variety. 19 The segment you were talking about is true, 20 that's one segment of the market, but that is not the 21 entire market. And Wes Roan, from Bard Manufacturing, 22 who is the key manufacturer of kind of the other

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 233 1 aspect from what we manufacturer, might well comment 2 further on this. 3 MR. EISNER: Wes? 4 MR. ROAN: A good example of an alternate 5 use for type of product would be cooling for tele6 communication shelters, that are all over the United 7 States. And that's where we would see the need for a 8 coated coil, is that type of application where or it 9 might be a sea coast application and it needs that 10 coated coil. 11 So, it's not a construction trailer unit, 12 specifically. It's not a classroom unit, 13 specifically. It could be used in a number of 14 different applications. 15 MR. SACHS: Thank you, Wes for helping me 16 understand. You all have some sense of what fraction 17 of shipment -- first of all, the size range. Does it 18 go up above six tons? And what is the typical 19 shipment -- the typical unit look like? Does it look 20 like a three ton? Are we seeing a lot of shipments 21 into larger applications? I'm just trying to get my 22 hands around what the product really is. Appreciate

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 234 1 your help. 2 MR. WINNINGHAM: Well, Harvey, our product 3 is somewhat limited in scope. So, Wes, if you could 4 kind of chime in, because I think that the key here is 5 more reflective around the type of product that Bard 6 makes. 7 MR. ROAN: The product that we make, again, 8 goes from one to six ton. It is a vertical unit. It 9 ranges, capacity-wise one to six ton in these volume 10 range across those product lines. 11 Various different voltages, phases, 12 depending on the application. We build some for 13 indoor mounting, some for outdoor mounting. So, it's 14 a wide variety of different products and there's a lot 15 of different features and options. 16 Percentage of units that get this coated 17 coil, though, I would say is pretty small. It's 18 probably in the -- less than I would say seven, eight 19 percent get coated coils. 20 MR. SACHS: Thank you. 21 MR. THARP: Harvey, I'll say I'm 22 disappointed that you stay at Motel 6, because they

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 235 1 leave the lights on. 2 MR. SACHS: For the record, that was Rusty. 3 MR. EISNER: Any more comments? Are you 4 ready for a vote? Anybody object? 5 MR. AMRANE: Yeah, I do. And I would like 6 to do an explanation as to why we're treating them 7 differently. What is the logic behind this decision? 8 MS. ARMSTRONG: I mean, I think our position 9 is HVAC was the exception where DOE gave because of 10 the large variety of unique designs, the one-offs, the 11 customs, the built to order nature of the equipment. 12 And so that's the one we gave on. Our position is 13 that they should be tested. 14 MR. EISNER: Any other discussion on this? 15 Any other objections? Any abstentions? 16 Okay. The record should reflect we do have 17 one objection. No abstentions. 18 Go to the next issue. Correction 19 capacitors. Any comments? 20 MS. ARMSTRONG: The rest are the same, I 21 think. 22 MS. HOOTMAN: These are the same as the

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 236 1 others. 2 MR. EISNER: Same objections you're saying? 3 MS. ARMSTRONG: No, the rest are the same as 4 HVAC. 5 MR. EISNER: Oh, they're all the same. 6 Okay. Any comments on correction capacitors? Any 7 objections? Any abstentions? 8 Okay. That one unanimous. 9 Hail guards. Any comments? Any objections? 10 Okay. Let's go to the next page. I'll give 11 you some time to read them. 12 MS. ARMSTRONG: So, I would assume that -- 13 I'm going to ask a question real quick and I'm going 14 to skip ahead. But the changes that we made to the 15 language and the clarifying language that we made to 16 HVAC, I assume I need to pull over. Correct? 17 MALE SPEAKER: Yeah. 18 MS. ARMSTRONG: Okay. 19 MR. EISNER: Any comments? Questions? 20 Dehumidification components. Any 21 objections? Any abstentions? 22 Okay. Unanimous there.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 237 1 Condenser fan motor options. Any 2 objections? Any abstentions? Okay. 3 And then last, Steam Hydronic Heat Options. 4 Any objections? Any abstentions? Okay. Unanimous 5 vote on each of these. 6 You can take a chance to read this page. 7 Any questions or comments on any of the three? 8 Okay. The suggestion was made we vote on 9 all three. Anybody have any objections to any of 10 them? Anybody abstain on any of them? Okay. All 11 three are unanimous. 12 MS. ARMSTRONG: So, I will just clarify. 13 The first one, High Efficiency Air Filtration, the 14 filter and the .8 is already in the existing test 15 procedure, so no clarification needed here. 16 MR. EISNER: Any questions or comments on 17 any of the three? Any objections to any of the three? 18 Any abstentions? Okay. All three are unanimous. 19 Any questions or comments on either of the 20 two? Any objections? Any abstentions? Okay. 21 These are also unanimous. 22 MS. ARMSTRONG: So, this is the same

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 238 1 language and if you want the evening to think about 2 it, this is the same language as for commercial HVAC. 3 MR. WINNINGHAM: Yes, I think we're going to 4 need further review on this. This is small fractional 5 and I don't know that we have the same type of 6 weighting process on these. 7 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yep. That's fine. The 8 concept, if we could find a similar concept, that's 9 fine. 10 MR. SACHS: We'd be happy if you just sold 11 all of them with ECMs. 12 MR. EISNER: Any other comments on this? 13 All right. We'll postpone the vote until tomorrow. 14 Computer room air conditions, we'll just 15 follow the same procedure, have people read it? 16 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yes. 17 MR. HUNT: Excuse me. This is Marshall 18 Hunt, PG&E. I realized, and I was hoping to see it 19 show up, but last time I entered in some concepts for 20 evaporated cooling. It should go as exceptions, very 21 similar to economizers and to draw for a pre-cooler to 22 a condenser that could be similar to a condenser fan.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 239 1 Did those get lost? I think they did. AHRI. It was 2 the time before last. 3 MS. ARMSTRONG: Right. So, no. They refer 4 to just evaporatively cooled and water cooled units. 5 Correct? 6 MR. HUNT: No, they attach to RTUs. 7 MS. ARMSTRONG: Okay. Then apparently they 8 got lost in the stack this morning. I apologize, 9 that's my fault. We can bring them back. 10 MR. HUNT: Tomorrow or -- 11 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah, we'll bring them back 12 tomorrow morning. I remember typing them. Let me 13 just find the right version. 14 MR. HUNT: The good news is they're very 15 parallel to what we've already covered, because of the 16 way that (inaudible) air flow thing. 17 MS. ARMSTRONG: No issues. Thanks. 18 MR. EISNER: Okay. Computer room air 19 conditioning definitions, any questions? Concerns? 20 Any objections? 21 MR. SACHS: This is language that was 22 negotiated with crack manufacturers in the meeting

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 240 1 last week, so they're all on board. 2 FEMALE SPEAKER: Yes, this was the 3 definition that we went through at that meeting. 4 MR. EISNER: Okay. Any objections? Any 5 abstentions? 6 Okay. Different features, why don't you 7 read the page. 8 Any questions or comments on any of the 9 three? Any objections? 10 MR. SACHS: I don't claim to know this 11 product class well, but given the claimed sensitivity 12 of the computer equipment itself, it's hard for me to 13 imagine that there would be a comparable coated 14 evaporator associated with this equipment. That is, 15 the environment is that corrosive -- 16 17 18 MS. ARMSTRONG: That was the Department's 19 position as well, which is why we have all coils 20 should be tested, but those were on the list of 21 exclusions from the manufacturers and they did explain 22 that there were situations where they could be

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 241 1 offered. 2 MR. SACHS: Well, I apologize for agreeing 3 with the Department this time. 4 MR. THARP: The condenser coil could easily 5 be. 6 MALE SPEAKER: That's different. 7 MALE SPEAKER: Yes. That's different. 8 MALE SPEAKER: But not the evaporator. 9 MR. SACHS: If somebody wants to spec a 10 coated copper evaporator for this computer room. 11 That's what BNSA (ph) is spending that much money on. 12 MS. HOOTMAN: Likely. 13 MR. EISNER: Any objections? Any 14 abstentions? 15 MS. ARMSTRONG: These are the same. 16 MR. EISNER: Any questions or comments on 17 any of the three? Any objections? Any abstentions? 18 Okay. All three are unanimous. 19 Any questions on either one? Any 20 objections? Any abstentions? 21 Okay. Unanimous. 22 BRF systems, less than 65,000 BTUH?

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 242 1 MR. HUNT: Let me butt in real quickly. We 2 will need the evaporative -- condenser air evaporative 3 cooling component. We are starting to see that in 4 use. 5 MALE SPEAKER: In cracks? 6 MR. HUNT: Yes. When they're a split 7 system, obviously. 8 MS. HOOTMAN: Okay, well, I'll have that for 9 tomorrow morning. Just say which one it's applicable 10 to. 11 So, during lunch, these are the ones that 12 you guys sent me. I tried to put them together real 13 quick, that you sent me this morning. So, these 14 should be reflective of what you've sent me, for the 15 most part. 16 MR. THARP: Bob, does this have your 17 revision on the definition basic model? 18 MR. WHITWELL: Well, the only question, I 19 guess, looking at this is do we need to have the last 20 sentence, "basic models also determine according to 21 tested combination definition," because that's in the 22 test procedure, the definition of the tested

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 243 1 combination. So, I'm not sure it's required. 2 MS. ARMSTRONG: Then it's probably not 3 needed. 4 MR. WHITWELL: It describes it there. 5 MR. EISNER: Other questions or concerns? 6 Any objections? Any abstentions? 7 Okay. Any questions or comments on any of 8 the three? 9 MR. HUNT: How do you do an economizer on a 10 VRF? Am I just thinking of the wrong product? 11 MR. THARP: It is a sister division that 12 manufactures the product and it is an option, even on 13 the ceiling mount. 14 MR. HUNT: So, they duct in? Okay. 15 MR. EISNER: Any other questions? 16 MR. WHITWELL: So, is it just bringing in 17 fresh air? 18 MR. THARP: I think it's actually 19 economizing and not fresh air. Just like, you know, 20 some you can't have an economizer with a area worker. 21 Most economizers install on rooftop units you can have 22 it, but you can't have an economizer.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 244 1 MR. EISNER: Any other questions? 2 MS. MEYERS: This is Karen. I just think 3 coated coils on VRF should be treated the same as 4 large 5 HVAC. 6 MR. EISNER: Any other comments on that 7 issue? 8 MR. THARP: I agree. Again, it's a very 9 small percentage of the market and that's one of the 10 reasons we're exempting more commercial HVAC because 11 it's in the low single digits. 12 MR. EISNER: Jury response the same? 13 MS. ARMSTRONG: I'm thinking of my response. 14 MR. CYMBALSKY: Why would it be treated any 15 different if it's really the same applications? 16 MS. ARMSTRONG: I think the Department's 17 position generally, across the board, is that they 18 should be tested. We do not feel that coated coil 19 should be an exception. Coated coils we have in a lot 20 of different equipment. We have in residential and 21 commercial space as well. And they're subject to 22 testing and they're subject to verification and

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 245 1 they're subject -- they must meet the standards, et 2 cetera, et cetera. So, I guess that, the commercial 3 HVAC we gave, we made an exception. 4 VRFs are a newly regulated product. There's 5 not a legacy here that we're dealing with. Our 6 position here is that they should be eligible for 7 testing. 8 MS. BARHYDT: Keep in mind you can still put 9 them in -- 10 MR. EISNER: Would you repeat what you said? 11 MS. ARMSTRONG: The correct way to do this, 12 if coated coils are such a big issue, the correct way 13 to do this would be to deal with them as a product 14 class. That is how our regulatory structure allows. 15 Now, I realize for certain types of 16 equipment that have been regulated for a long time, 17 and we've never addressed the issue, that we needed to 18 come to a negotiated solution, and that's what we were 19 trying to do. 20 MR. CLEMENTS: I guess the only point of 21 clarification, from my point of view, is that we 22 consider ourselves commercial HVAC. You know, our

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 246 1 product happens to be -- 2 MALE SPEAKER: Can you speak close to the 3 mic, please. 4 MR. CLEMENTS: John Clements, Mitsubishi 5 Electric. What I said was we consider our products to 6 be commercial HVAC. The market differentiation that 7 you're calling it VRF, but at its core it is 8 commercial HVAC. So, it is for the same purpose, the 9 same applications, the same buildings, we don't see 10 any reason to (inaudible) the separation. 11 MR. THARP: Second what John says, in that 12 VRF is really a subset of commercial HVAC. 13 MS. BARHYDT: So, you're arguing that we 14 should test the coated coils for the HVAC, too, then? 15 MR. THARP: No. 16 MS. BARHYDT: No? 17 MR. THARP: Again, stating industry's 18 position that overall we're saving energy over the 19 life of the product. And that's our position is that 20 we feel that we're -- 21 MS. ARMSTRONG: I mean, well -- 22 MS. MEYERS: You're increasing the testing

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 247 1 burden and certification for a very small percentage 2 of the market that saves a lot of energy. So -- 3 MS. ARMSTRONG: Or not, right? Because they 4 can still be grouped, they don't need to be tested 5 separately, you still have your AEDM you can still 6 call them the same base model. 7 MR. THARP: But that's saying is I need -- 8 we say that the coated coils call it one percent 9 reduction in performance off the shelf. That means I 10 have to increase -- for two percent of my production I 11 have to increase efficiency on the other 90-some 12 percent in order to make sure that that one percent is 13 covered. If that makes sense. 14 MS. ARMSTRONG: It does. I mean, if you're 15 that close to the standard, you're really that close 16 to the standard. 17 MR. THARP: In some product -- you know, 18 when a manufacturer develops a product -- 19 MS. ARMSTRONG: And we gave you a five 20 percent tolerance. 21 MR. THARP: Well, five percent tolerance -- 22 MS. HOOTMAN: You gave us a five percent

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 248 1 tolerance for manufacturing, not variance. 2 MR. THARP: Right. 3 MS. HOOTMAN: It's not testing variance, 4 which we can prove up to eight percent testing 5 variance. 6 MR. WHITWELL: So, does this mean -- I guess 7 the way I was interpreting the position on these is 8 that where things are exempt from testing, they also 9 are not factored into the rating. But where they are 10 subject to testing, they need to be in the rating. 11 So, what Rusty is saying is correct. He's 12 going to be adding cost to the vast majority of his 13 product to cover that two percent that have the coated 14 coils. 15 MR. HURST: This is John Hurst with Lennox. 16 That's if the manufacturer chooses to modify the 98 17 percent to cover the two. You could have an intended 18 circumstance where the manufacturer chooses not to do 19 that and add cost to the 90 plus percent. Coated 20 coils can be done in the field. So, I would say what 21 you ask for, you might get it. 22 MS. HOOTMAN: And to add to what John said,

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 249 1 if you've ever seen a coated coil in the field, it's 2 your worst nightmare. 3 MR. THARP: Those will definitely increase 4 energy consumption significantly, because the field 5 applied coatings block half the coil, approximately. 6 MR. EISNER: Wes Roan, online, you have a 7 comment? 8 MR. ROAN: Yeah, I was just going to mention 9 that this is the same type of discussion that we have 10 at SPVU and I just haven't heard any kind of good 11 argument that says why one coated coil should be 12 allowed and another not allowed, depending on what 13 particular product. It's the same treatment; we all 14 use them, they ought to be treated all the same. 15 MR. THARP: I'll say I feel guilty, at this 16 point, for not objecting to the SPVU. And also Lennox 17 was out of the room at the time during the vote. I'm 18 sure if Lennox was in they probably would have 19 objected. 20 MALE SPEAKER: They probably would have. 21 MR. BALLO: This is Tim Ballo, and this is 22 maybe not going to be helpful, but the way I sort of

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 250 1 had approached this was in thinking about coated 2 coils, the ones that seem most problematic to me are 3 the ones not just the sea coast applications for 4 industrial type applications where they're going to be 5 exposed, I guess the evaporator coils, to some sort of 6 really harsh chemicals in their every day use. 7 And I'm wondering if that's the type of 8 thing that we could look at across all the product 9 categories, rather than broadly exempting coated coils 10 for certain types of products. That was just a 11 thought. 12 MR. EISNER: Other comments? Questions? 13 MR. HON: I'd like to -- coated coils, if 14 they would possibly come up with a much more 15 descriptive and much more severe protective coating, 16 say 2,000 hours as a specialty, could that be 17 exempted? 18 MS. BARHYDT: Can you say your name? 19 MALE SPEAKER: Charlie. 20 MS. BARHYDT: Charlie. 21 MR. EISNER: Reaction to that? 22 MR. THARP: Manufacturer reaction to 2,000

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 251 1 hours G85 or 117 is extremely (inaudible). I don't 2 think much of the product at all would be left after 3 2,000 hours. 4 MR. HON: But we're trying to discuss a 5 special case application here, severe industrial 6 application. Could we come up some number -- 7 MS. HOOTMAN: Agreed, Charlie. But if you 8 look at AIA specifications or any of the typical CSI 9 specifications for these environments, 500 hours is a 10 commonly specified amount. So that is what the 11 consulting engineers are asking for for these 12 environments. Anyone doing over and above that is 13 doing over and above and, you know, applauded for 14 that. But I'm just saying the standard practice is 500 15 hours. 16 MR. EISNER: Any other comment? I suggest 17 we vote on economizers and snow wind guards first. 18 Anybody have any objections to those two? Anybody 19 have any abstentions? 20 Okay, I'd like to take a five minute break 21 and we'll think about the remaining issue on this page 22 for a couple minutes. Like to talk to some people

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 252 1 about it. 2 (Whereupon, a brief recess was taken.) 3 MS. BARHYDT: If everyone can just pay 4 attention to make sure that you continue to speak 5 clearly and loudly. We're having a little bit of 6 trouble with the recording, making sure that she's 7 able to pick up all of the discussion. In particular, 8 people seem to be dropping off as they talk. 9 MR. EISNER: Okay, let's see if we can have 10 a little more discussion and get some resolution on 11 coated coils. 12 MS. ARMSTRONG: Okay. We will give. We'll 13 do coated coils like HVAC or VRF. 14 FEMALE SPEAKER: Vote. Quickly. 15 MR. EISNER: Ready to vote? Do you want to 16 ask why? 17 MR. SACHS: You just want to go home or 18 what? 19 GROUP: Yes. 20 MALE SPEAKER: All coated coils are not to 21 be chosen to test? 22 MS. ARMSTRONG: We're only talking about

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 253 1 VRFs. 2 MR. EISNER: Okay. Any questions? 3 MR. CLEMENT: We're fine with it so far. 4 Mitsubishi Electric, we're fine with it. It protects 5 us, if that's the way we're going. 6 MS. ARMSTRONG: We gave what you -- you got 7 what you wanted. So, you should be very happy. 8 MR. EISNER: VRF will be treated like HVAC. 9 MR. CLEMENT: Thank you. 10 MR. EISNER: Okay. 11 MR. AMRANE: Yes, thank you, but we should 12 treat as PVU the same. 13 MS. ARMSTRONG: Don't be greedy. 14 MR. EISNER: Okay. We're going to vote. 15 Any objections? Any abstentions? 16 Okay, it's unanimous. Everybody want to go 17 home now? 18 MS. HOOTMAN: Yes. 19 MR. EISNER: Okay, next issue. Hill guards, 20 fresh air dampeners, high efficiency air filtration. 21 Position for vote, question marks. 22 MS. ARMSTRONG: So, I understand -- this was

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 254 1 on the list that I got this morning and it didn't have 2 a position on it. None of them did; I just kind of 3 made it up as I went. But I think this is taken care 4 of in the test procedure, in terms of what filter to 5 use and then there's the default. You want to speak 6 up back there? 7 MR. STEM: It is. 8 MS. ARMSTRONG: So, that's Mike from 9 Intertek, since he doesn't want to come to the 10 microphone, saying it's dealt with in the test 11 procedure. 12 MR. EISNER: Any other questions or comments 13 on these three? Some people need time to read it. 14 Okay, any -- 15 MR. SACHS: The wording is off. I assume 16 you're going to edit the wording, I know what "Lois 17 Air Filtration" means. 18 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yes, I will edit the 19 wording. I was copying and pasting during lunch really 20 quickly. 21 MR. EISNER: Do we want to vote on these now 22 or, Harvey, are you saying we should wait till --

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 255 1 MR. SACHS: No, it's fine. 2 MR. EISNER: It's fine. Okay. Any comments 3 or questions on any of these three? Any objections? 4 Any abstentions? 5 MS. ARMSTRONG: So, someone's going to have 6 to explain what you mean by "electric heaters," and 7 why they shouldn't be included for testing. 8 MR. THARP: What was the position? 9 MS. ARMSTRONG: There was no position and 10 then -- 11 MR. THARP: On commercial HVAC? 12 MS. ARMSTRONG: There's not one. They're 13 tested. 14 MR. THARP: Keep the same as commercial 15 HVAC. 16 MS. ARMSTRONG: So, this is a nonissue. 17 Just remove it. 18 MR. EISNER: And on the remaining two, any 19 questions or issues? Any objections? Any 20 abstentions? 21 MR. EISNER: Okay. And Low ambient. 22 Question marks?

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 256 1 MS. ARMSTRONG: I think the question mark 2 was what is your ask here? So, the Excel sheet had 3 explanations, but what is your ask. That they just be 4 sealed for nothing? 5 MR. THARP: That low ambient cooling dampers 6 be not tested. The ask is that low ambient cooling 7 dampers not be tested. 8 MS. ARMSTRONG: I mean, what we've done for 9 all the rest of the damper-type things is just seal 10 them for testing. Period. 11 MR. THARP: Well, these are dampers that it 12 intentionally takes some discharged air from the 13 condenser and re-circulate it. 14 MS. ARMSTRONG: So you need them? 15 MR. THARP: So we need them for that. It's 16 a special application. Again, it's very low -- 17 relatively low volume of use (inaudible). 18 MS. ARMSTRONG: And so there's an equivalent 19 without that? 20 MR. THARP: I think it was -- yes. 21 MS. ARMSTRONG: Always? Okay. To just 22 exclude from the test?

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 257 1 MR. WHITWELL: Rusty, is this something 2 that can easily be removed? 3 MR. THARP: That is my understanding. 4 MR. WHITWELL: So that could be another 5 option. 6 MS. ARMSTRONG: So just remove for testing? 7 Okay. 8 MR. THARP: Yeah, remove for testing or test 9 without. 10 MS. ARMSTRONG: Okay. Just say remove for 11 testing. We would have to issue some type of 12 guidance. Is that okay? 13 MR. THARP: Yeah. 14 MR. EISNER: Okay. Any other comments or 15 questions no the three on the page? Any objections? 16 Any abstentions? 17 MR. SACHS: Again, some wordsmithing on 18 dehumidification components, because after all the 19 evaporator is a dehumidification component. I don't 20 think we want to test without the evaporator. 21 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah, the description we 22 tried to limit the larger.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 258 1 MR. EISNER: Okay. Any other concerns? 2 MR. SACHS: But there are also 3 dehumidification systems, I believe, that don't use 4 either liquid or solid (inaudible). 5 MS. ARMSTRONG: They wouldn't fall into this 6 category, based on this description. 7 MR. FLY: In HVAC, we had the high gas 8 reheat coils as a separate item. And this was just 9 covering (inaudible). I don't know if that helps any 10 or not, and I don't know what we're doing here, 11 because I haven't read ahead. 12 MS. ARMSTRONG: This is the last slide. 13 This is it for VRFs. 14 MR. FLY: The only other thing is it says 15 the lamps -- on UV lights it says lamps will be turned 16 off. I thought on HVAC we just said that they wouldn't 17 be selected with UV lamps. 18 MS. ARMSTRONG: No. 19 MR. FLY: Okay, was it just turned off? 20 MS. ARMSTRONG: It's exactly the same 21 language. Yeah. 22 MR. EISNER: Okay. Do we need to change

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 259 1 anything? 2 All right. Let's go to the next slide. 3 MS. ARMSTRONG: Did we vote on that one? 4 MR. EISNER: We had voted on it. 5 MS. ARMSTRONG: That's it. So, we're done. 6 Evaporatively cooled, water cooled and water source is 7 up for the morning. There was a couple of terms that 8 still we hadn't received definitions on or 9 explanations, in terms of what you guys were talking 10 about for those. So, if I have a chance, maybe I'll 11 pull those up and ask you if you can consider them 12 tonight, if we're going to talk about them in the 13 morning. We'll grab Marshall's things for the 14 morning. 15 And then this is just across the board. In 16 order to qualify for any of these exceptions for 17 guidance, you must have an identical model available 18 for test, without that option. This is just a 19 fundamental across the board. 20 MR. THARP: Actually, going back one, I 21 think on commercial HVAC there was one option that 22 wasn't discussed and that was air blenders. Mixers.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 260 1 MR. WHITWELL: The mixers and the return air 2 plenum are in the return air portion of the 3 (inaudible). 4 MR. THARP: Are you satisfied where we're 5 at, Mark? 6 MR. FLY: I mean, I threw them in there 7 because a company I used to work at did that. So, I 8 don't do it today, but they are used, especially in 9 testing equipment, which some of it's going to fall 10 under these regulations. So, I would like to see them 11 in the list. But I think they're -- you know, they're 12 similar -- I mean, you're not going to have them 13 without an economizer. 14 MS. ARMSTRONG: Then that's not going to be 15 tested. 16 MR. FLY: And that's not going to be tested, 17 so there's no reason to test the blender. I mean, you 18 can't really -- there's no reason to put them in if 19 you don't have an economizer. So, it seems like it'd 20 be a simple decision. 21 MS. ARMSTRONG: Or it's unnecessary because 22 we're not going to test one with an economizer.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 261 1 MR. FLY: Or we can call it part of the 2 economizer. 3 MS. ARMSTRONG: Why do we even need to 4 separate them out? 5 MS. HOOTMAN: What I would say is, because 6 like in our model numbering scheme and our pricing 7 scheme, if you are not going to order it with an 8 economizer -- it's tied to an economizer. 9 MS. ARMSTRONG: Yeah, so we're not even 10 going to -- 11 MS. HOOTMAN: It's mutually -- I mean, you 12 can't get it. 13 MS. ARMSTRONG: So, I don't think they need 14 to be called out separately. 15 MR. FLY: Okay. 16 MS. ARMSTRONG: It's just one of those 17 things that comes with it. Okay. 18 MR. WHITWELL: Should we go back to Lennox 19 had an objection? 20 MS. HOOTMAN: No. 21 MS. ARMSTRONG: So, I think that's it for 22 today. We made good headway. Thank you guys all.

### Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 262 1 There's a couple homework items for us and you guys. 2 We did -- Jeremiah already sent out the motor language 3 and we've gotten some additional requests for time. 4 So, consider it -- I think you understand the premise 5 of what we were trying to do. There's some nuances 6 that probably need to be worked out, language, look 7 into it. Instead of dealing with it tomorrow, we'll 8 deal with it at the next set of meetings. 9 And I'm not sure exactly what we're going to 10 talk about tomorrow. We'll figure it out tonight. 11 (Whereupon, at 5:00 p.m., the 12 Appliance Standards and Rulemaking 13 Federal Advisory Committee was 14 concluded.) 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22Capital Reporting Company Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

1 CERTIFICATE OF COURT REPORTER 2 3 I, JANEL B. FOLSOM, the Court Reporter before 4 whom the foregoing proceeding was taken, do hereby 5 certify that the proceeding was recorded by me; that 6 the proceeding was thereafter reduced to typewriting 7 under my dire c tion; that said transcript is a true and 8 accurate record of the proceeding; that I am neither 9 related to nor employed by any of the parties to this 10 proceeding; and, further, that I have no financial 11 interest in this proceeding. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

## <tlr~I~(~ 

# \ fA n 

# , J;**~O[J ~** 

' : [ " .mNE L ' J:t:""" FO LSOM Date D ng ital Court Reporter

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 263Capital Reporting Company Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

1 CERTIFICATE OF TRANSCRIPTION 2 3 I, MARY YOUNG, hereby certify that I am not the Court 4 Reporter who reported the following proceeding and 5 that I have typed the transcript of this proceeding 6 using the Court Reporter's notes and recordings. The 7 foregoing/attached transcript is a true, correct and 8 complete transcription of said proceeding. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1 9 20 21 22

# ~~-**--** Transcriptionist

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitaIReportingCompany.com © 2013 264Capital Reporting Company Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013

1 CERTIFICATE OF TRANSCRIPTION 2 3 I, SUSAN LAPOOH, hereby certify that I am not the 4 Court Reporter who reported the following proceeding 5 and that I have typed the transcript of this 6 proceeding using the Court Reporter's notes and 7 recordings. The foregoing/attached transcript is a 8 true, correct and complete transcription of said 9 proceeding. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Transcriptionist

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 265Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 1

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 0 0.03 191:14 0.08 187:8 199:13 0.09 191:14 00 69:8 0413-2 1:7 08 190:7,19 191:8 195:13 200:5,21 202:10 209:22 210:11 1 1 33:1,2 118:3,13 122:6,11 136:17,18 137:1,6 139:20 210:16 1,000 220:15 1,500 227:4 10 18:3 41:10 117:20 218:7 10.5 218:5 10:03 1:10 100 120:16 1000 1:13 10-ton 130:19 11 122:10,11 11:30 76:15 115 98:3 117 162:19 251:1 125 213:16 13 182:14 14 124:2 140 18:4 14-inch 124:6 150 27:12 16 124:3 203:7,9 17 1:9 2 2 118:3,13 136:18 137:1,6 179:12 180:6,9 183:10 2,000 250:16,22 251:3 20 117:20 148:5 200 217:16 2013 1:9 20585 1:16 230 98:2,3 24 30:10,22 38:1 25 83:13 3 3 119:13,15,18,20 130:18 210:14,15,16 3:30 212:10 30 76:18 300 110:22 3030 201:6 31 124:3 31.25 218:18 31st79:1,10,14 197:12 343-60 192:2 360 191:20 3-phase 130:18 4 4 210:14 40 63:7 429 41:11 48 31:1 32:3 5 5 210:16 5,000 18:5 5:00 262:11 50 99:15 500 162:9 251:9,14 55 49:18 6 6 114:20 191:15 193:13 232:7 234:22 60 63:4 158:16 62.1 190:14 191:20 64 53:5 65 68:7 65,000 130:18 241:22 7 70 99:17 158:16 70/55 64:8 72 30:7 34:8 36:20 37:1 72-2005 31:16 75 53:5 100:22 212:6 75/55 54:14,22 63:2,9,20 67:1,2 68:7 75-degree49:18 7th 182:13,21 8 8 188:20 237:14 8.3 218:10

80 99:17 158:16 80-degree160:3 85 68:8 89.5 218:5 8E-089 1:15 9 90 83:14 248:19 90.6 218:8 90-some 247:11 91.7 218:10 92.5 218:12 95 160:4,5 216:14 98 248:16 A a.m1:10 AAON3:3 7:20 129:2 132:2 143:3 153:13 158:5 190:16 ability65:21 69:3 73:3 151:21 164:16 191:18 able 34:2 39:16 52:14,15 60:19 65:7,10 67:16,17 70:11 78:5 94:8 109:8 139:22 152:4 222:12 224:11 252:7 absolutely100:13 103:4 143:12,17 144:15 150:21 157:21 absorption 92:4 abstain 11:7,8 29:3 44:19 86:14Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 2

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 87:21 115:8 133:12 159:7 184:5 211:17 237:10 abstention 44:22 46:1,13 47:10 118:19 abstentions 12:1 18:13 20:1 33:6 38:14 44:17 45:1,3,5 46:15 47:2,4 48:6 86:14 87:2,11 88:20 89:10 90:9 91:11 95:20 96:21 97:6 98:17 102:8 110:13 115:1 118:18,19 123:22 124:8 126:12 133:21 134:10 159:19 160:21 165:7,18 166:4,13 167:3 168:9 173:12 176:12 183:4 184:4,19 185:21 186:10 213:8,21 214:15 215:5 227:16,19 228:10 235:15,17 236:7,21 237:2,4,18,20 240:5 241:14,17,20 243:6 251:19 253:15 255:4,20 257:16 accept 152:5,7 193:2 accepted53:7 accepting174:15 accessories 5:7,9 34:9 91:3 accessory 34:8 accommodate 157:4 accommodation 129:13 accomplished 122:22 accordance79:20 according18:6 214:7 242:20 accounted27:2 72:16 109:19 accounts 28:16 accumulate 31:11 53:18 accumulates 30:16 accurate263:8 accurately

31:13 ACEEE 6:16 11:9 achieve201:14 211:22 achieved 37:5,11 achieving 30:21 acids 90:13 161:20 acquired 203:8 across 84:19 109:11 133:17 134:1 138:6,8 140:5 191:15 193:19 234:10 244:17 250:8 259:15,19 activate75:19,21 99:15 active97:4 99:1 actual30:11 31:12 37:1 53:22 146:14 221:15

actually4:17 20:10 34:1 35:5 37:6,9,10 38:8 39:8 40:15 41:6 45:6 60:14 78:20 79:18 84:22 101:15 106:6 114:3 119:7 123:6 129:18 135:6 138:4,8 164:18 172:2 175:16 179:15 182:12,13 191:4 196:3 207:20 226:5 231:18 243:18 259:20 adaptable 82:21 add 14:8 20:20 22:12 26:7 31:3,4 35:12,15 38:18 104:12 105:8 107:16 113:11,16 141:20 154:1 160:17 162:20 164:3 173:20 178:20 179:3 195:12 201:4 248:19,22 added 48:21 90:12 97:13 102:10,11 135:4 173:15 177:7 181:20 182:2 187:9,22 226:17 adding 17:10 22:9 29:11 110:12 183:2 208:18 248:12 additional 5:10 20:20 22:9,12 24:10 28:4,6 47:21 54:17,18

55:21 58:10 91:19 97:8,10 135:11 141:13 262:3 address 27:1 77:16,21 79:8 119:7 addressed 89:15 245:17 addressing 127:17 adjacent 92:17 adjust40:3 81:1 212:17 adjustable 41:20 42:5,20 43:7 100:3 adjustment44:13 adjusts 77:8 admittedly 114:15,18 adopt17:20 advantages 82:8 adverse32:16 advertising20:22 Advisory1:5 262:13 advocate196:15 AEDM131:13 133:14,15 134:1,7 149:2 152:19 158:1 247:5 AEDMs 156:4 158:21 aesthetic124:11 affect9:5 10:3 11:4 13:12,17Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 3

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 18:20 73:21 affected 207:22 affecting 13:18 106:1 affiliation 6:8 affixed 21:18 against122:8 156:8 160:4 ago 157:9 173:9 211:21 agreeable4:14 227:12 agreed134:9 157:8 172:7 200:18 251:7 agreeing186:19 241:2 agreement29:4 59:1 79:13 185:22 186:11 191:17,21 212:2 213:9 214:16 Ah 17:15 ahead 9:16 20:10,16 26:2 33:20 105:12 171:14 173:20 231:3 236:14 258:11 AHRI 7:2 128:3 129:19 140:11 144:6 146:21 180:10 187:1 199:11 208:10,16 239:1 AHRI's 53:7 AIA251:8 air2:10,12,15 3:5 4:7 6:21 8:5,21,22 10:8 31:19 41:8 54:16 67:8 82:12 92:17 96:22 97:1,2,3 115:4 117:1 118:21,22 119:1,2,3,6 121:1,4 125:1,3 127:2,15 141:8,15,17 142:1 154:11 155:5 159:9,11,12 160:2,4 161:21 165:11 166:17 168:13 176:4 184:10 185:3,10,13,14,1 5,18 186:1,12,13,14,1 5,16 187:2,5 190:3 191:13,15 193:11 195:2 200:19,20 206:20 213:12,13 227:4 237:13 238:14 239:16,18 242:2 243:17,19 253:20 254:17 256:12 259:22 260:1,2 Air-cooled127:1 airflow 87:16 90:4 146:14 air-movement 121:17 air-moving 110:21 121:12 127:7 alarms 87:5,6 alcohols 161:20 Alex3:14 8:10 algorithm60:8 alkalized 161:20

all-copper138:19 alleviate 197:5,9 alleviated 193:21 Alliance-type 158:18 Allied 3:5 8:4 227:4 allow 13:21,22 32:19 46:2 53:18 167:9 185:2 186:3 206:3,5 207:14 allowed 42:16 93:18 142:13 210:1 212:21 249:12 allowing 185:4,11 220:13 allows 11:10 143:21 150:14 245:14 alone 177:10 already28:16 41:10 53:11 65:5 89:21 132:5,6 164:20,22 196:21,22 237:14 239:15 262:2 alternate233:4 alternative82:17 177:9 178:9 179:2,22 194:18,19 alternatives 198:6 altogether

124:19 183:20 aluminum137:15 141:4 143:8,22 146:18 148:15

am14:1 32:7 44:19 152:7 156:7 227:21 243:10 263:8 264:3 265:3 ambient 38:20 43:15,16 49:18 59:18 63:13 67:3,6,13 98:22 255:21 256:5,6 ambiguity

15:21 ambiguous 14:16 amenable 200:11 amend 105:2 American 3:4 amount 23:16,19 31:4 75:4 139:16 251:10 Amrane 2:10 7:2 78:22 79:3,7 94:20 115:16 116:2 117:8 121:7,11 128:3 133:13,17 135:1 140:11,18 179:9 180:4 181:16,18 183:5,18 199:11,18,21 200:2 208:10 228:18,21 229:5,10,19 230:2 231:19 235:5 253:11 analogs 82:9 and/or 102:11 156:4 159:11 162:1 165:5 174:10 angle 191:13 anomaly 201:13Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 4

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 answer10:11 29:21 53:4 57:6 58:2,3 118:10 158:3 182:11 answer's 192:7 anticipating 91:7 anti-sweat38:18 39:21 45:11 anybody9:16 10:18 11:7,8 29:2 36:9 45:4 46:21 58:16 76:21 86:13 87:21 91:20 102:15 115:7,8 133:8,9,12 159:6,7 167:21 211:16,17 215:5 227:15,16,20 235:4 237:9,10 251:18 anymore123:7 anyone 42:8 148:4 184:6 208:6 251:12 anything 9:22 33:18 42:21 52:2 53:8,9 56:5 59:21 68:8 78:19 86:2 89:9 90:22 92:10 105:18,19 123:21 163:21 167:21 168:8 210:6 211:13 212:14 259:1 anyway25:19 77:15 109:16 128:22 180:7 188:6 208:9 apart15:16 apologize 239:8 241:2 apparently239:7

applauded 251:13 apples 22:18,19 Appliance 1:4 262:12 applicable 28:15 48:13 242:9 application 231:5 232:6,10,11 233:8,9 234:12 251:5,6 256:16 applications 38:19 90:5 99:8 109:18 224:8 230:12 231:9 232:15 233:14,21 244:15 246:9 250:3,4 applied 200:21 230:11 231:18,22 232:6 249:5 apply94:17 116:7 appreciate33:8 36:8 122:2,3 233:22 approach 33:6 45:7 60:11 76:10 102:16 179:14 220:18 approached 250:1 appropriate 120:14 191:19 214:7,8 approximately 249:5 arbitrary 122:9 architectural 125:8,11,17 area13:18 15:17 182:18 186:3 190:22 243:20 areas 18:3 103:17 105:17 129:17 191:4 211:9 aren't23:18 146:3 195:7 arguing 147:19 246:13 argument138:15 249:11 arguments 138:18 Aris 3:18 Armstrong2:5 5:10,15,19 6:1,7,10,13 7:12 8:16 9:13,17 10:6,14 11:12,17,21 12:5,9,19,22 13:2 14:2,5,14,19 16:21 21:15,21 22:5,7,11 23:14 24:5,17 25:13 26:11,18,20 27:5,14,17,20 28:12,20 29:9,13 35:12,15 36:1,7 38:4,7,12 39:6,12 40:7 42:3,8 43:9,21 44:14 46:19 47:16,18 48:5,20 49:3,9,12,15,20 50:13,21 51:22 52:8,17 53:1 55:8 56:14 57:10 58:1,18 59:11 60:1 61:1,14 62:10 63:22 64:5 66:11 67:10,22 68:3,6,10,21 69:2,4,15,19

71:5 72:8,12,18 73:5,9,11 77:2 78:3,12 79:5,11 80:3,8,12,21 81:3,5,12,20 82:2 83:2,10,20 84:14,17 85:2,5,17,21 86:5,8,10 88:6,15,18 89:8,19 90:1,19 91:7 92:5,12 93:14,19 94:2,7,11,14 95:6 96:5,19 97:17 98:11,13 99:19 100:12,15,19 101:2,6,22 102:3,6,19 103:1,4,6,8,12 104:18,22 105:4,21 106:12,20 107:4,9,12,16,19 ,21 108:15,19 111:7 112:3,5,9,12,16, 18 113:1,5,7 116:9 117:13 118:8 119:9,14 120:2,10,12,17,1 9 121:1,3,14 126:1,6,9 127:22 128:6 129:4,10 130:2,10,20 131:10,21 132:6,9,20 133:11,16,19 134:3,5,20 135:3,8,17 136:1,4,7 137:22 138:3,20 140:10,16,20Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 5

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 142:11 143:12,17,20 147:17 148:2,11 149:10,12,20 150:2,6,12,17,21 151:2,5,9,19 152:1,9 153:4,18 155:13 156:20 157:21 158:11 159:4 161:11,14 163:1,4,17,19 164:3,13 165:5 167:19 168:3 169:2,5,7,14,17, 21 170:2,6,14,17,22 171:7,13 172:3,11,14,19 173:2,6,16,20 174:9 177:15,17 180:14 182:15,20,22 183:14,21 187:11,13,17 188:2 192:7,22 193:16 194:20 196:14 197:4,8 198:7,19 199:3,19,22 201:8,11 202:5,9,18 204:1,5,10,18 206:7 208:22 210:4 211:15 212:5,13 218:13,16 221:9,13 222:2,21 223:21 225:15,20 226:1,3 227:2,8,10,13 228:15,19 229:2,8,15,22 231:2 235:8,20 236:3,12,18 237:12,22 238:7,16 239:3,7,11,17 240:18 241:15 243:2 244:13,16 245:11 246:21 247:3,14,19 252:12,22 253:6,13,22 254:8,18 255:5,9,12,16 256:1,8,14,18,21 257:6,10,21 258:5,12,18,20 259:3,5 260:14,21 261:3,9,13,16,21 articulated93:15 artificially104:12 Ashley2:5 7:12 11:20 14:4,5 16:22 17:12 22:6 28:12 29:12 40:6 43:22 56:15 70:4 77:3,18 83:11 90:20 119:17 128:1 143:4 209:21 210:9 231:11 Ashley's 76:22 ASHRAE 30:7 34:7 36:20 53:7 Asia114:8 as-is 114:22 aspect117:3 210:1 233:1 ASRAC 78:17 79:13 assemble 66:19 assembled 162:3,5 assembly118:22 119:2 159:9 166:16 168:12 176:15,17 182:2 184:22 186:2,13,15 213:11 214:4 215:8,11 assigned 201:2 associated240:14 Association 8:11 assume23:22 31:16 60:4 78:9 106:10 132:3 188:8 197:14 209:22 219:9 236:12,16 254:15 assuming80:6 88:3 147:12 181:14 assure 65:12 80:12 assured 70:12 assures 80:12 asterisk 150:20 151:12 ASTM162:8,20 165:3 attach 239:6 attached93:22 95:3 attain 109:15 attempted 97:18 attention 252:4 attenuators 213:11 automatic 77:8 84:9,11,12,14,18 154:10 automatically44:6 106:22 184:22

available 62:1 108:16 116:13 119:2 140:4 144:10 154:16 155:3,6,15 159:17 161:8 165:16 167:1,13,17 168:19 173:4 177:5,20 178:3 184:16 185:19 186:15 197:13 213:5,19 214:13 224:13 259:17 Avenue 1:13 average76:9 avoid 62:3 74:5 177:15,17 178:19 209:2 216:16 224:1,2 Aw84:3 aware 211:1 away69:3 90:5 126:21 154:2 203:21 208:13,17 awful 46:3 178:10 190:8 225:8 B B117 162:8,22 165:4 backend 225:9 background 156:5 bad 74:17 107:5 baked 17:17 161:22 Ballo 2:11 75:8 249:21Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 6

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 band 213:16 bank 225:6 Bard 232:21 234:5 Barhydt2:6 4:6 5:11,14,21 6:9 7:11 8:6,20 10:7,10,20 13:6 18:15 19:14 20:3,10,15,18 29:6,11 30:1 33:11 34:16 38:16 39:7 40:14 45:6 54:9 78:14 79:2 81:1,4 84:22 86:16 87:4,13 88:7,22 89:11,21 90:3,11,20 91:4,13 92:14 95:14 96:6,9,13 97:1,8,16 98:19 99:22 102:10 104:8 105:8,10 106:8 107:17 108:3 109:20 110:14 111:5 115:2,9 116:1 118:21 124:2,10 126:22 129:6 152:2,7 154:9 159:8 161:1,13,15,17 163:22 165:8,19 166:6,15 167:5 168:11 176:14 180:1 181:22 184:8,21 186:1,12,21 203:11 212:16 213:10 214:3,17 215:7 245:8 246:13,16 250:18,20 252:3 Barometric 184:21 base 102:18 103:2 118:15 157:10,14 169:17 171:8 175:3 215:15,16,19,20 216:8,17 218:6 220:8,15,17,20 221:17,18 222:11 223:18 247:6 based 51:12 62:4 84:10 118:2 258:6 basic 4:12 8:20,22 10:4,20,21 11:10 12:20 13:6,7 14:1 15:12 17:1,16 18:15,16 19:10,12,15 20:11 24:3 34:8 61:17 110:14 126:22 127:2 130:13,19 134:2,6,17 143:7,8,10 144:1,8,9,11 145:7 146:8,19 147:5 149:1 150:15,22 151:20 155:7 174:7,14 176:3 215:13 219:14 226:17 242:17,20 basically30:5,8 37:4 42:9 82:12 88:9 93:9 101:17 122:17 142:1 147:13,18,20,21 148:7 162:21 163:9 221:21 basis 138:14

Bauman 2:12 6:20 23:10,15 24:8 25:9 26:1,3,12,19 27:4 29:15,16 30:3 31:18 33:19 34:4,21 35:7,13 36:5,8,16 37:3,14,18,21 38:6,8,11 42:18 43:1,7 51:3 53:13 55:12 58:4 69:3 81:9,18 82:1,3 84:5 85:8,20 86:21 89:6 98:7 100:5,14,17,21 101:4,9 102:1,4 104:20 105:1 106:13 135:20 136:3,5 Beaver172:21 became 188:19 become 23:3 becomes 85:3 189:1 202:6 206:12 beforehand 37:12 begin 30:11 beginning 30:6,12 42:10 behind 140:2 157:7 229:11 235:7 believe 25:1 31:11 33:16 89:16 102:14 105:11 106:6 136:21 139:8 146:3 258:3 believes 33:13 38:20 115:5,13

belong 112:13 belt220:20 223:2 benefit15:7 118:10 Benoit1:21 best62:15 68:14 better 19:7 23:6 24:2,3,13 34:18 56:13 67:20 80:16 82:17 84:2 97:21 98:11 109:4 118:6 138:1 139:11,13 145:17 176:1 191:5 200:22 beyond 156:9 bigger32:17 191:4 217:2 bit18:7 23:11,12 111:18 125:9 131:3 138:5 252:5 blade 170:10 171:5 blah 35:11 blame82:22 164:2 blender260:17 blenders 259:22 block 249:5 blocking 87:15 blower 181:20 182:2 blowers 215:7 blown 193:4 BNSA241:11 board 65:11 211:17 240:1Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 7

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 244:17 259:15,19 Bob 6:19 9:6 111:17 124:15 134:11 140:22 142:16 152:15,17 168:20 178:7 183:10 188:10 197:22 242:16 Bob's 148:15 168:2 body20:21 boiler12:18 boilers 10:21,22 bonded 162:2 bookmark

47:11 Bosenberg3:14 8:10 bother88:11 box 49:11 brackets 119:1 186:14 break 76:13,21 212:10 225:14,16,19 251:20 BRF 220:21 241:22 brief 76:16 225:21 252:2 bring 4:3 48:1 131:10,11,12 134:12 135:16 183:22 226:15 239:9,11 bringing 30:9 243:16 broad 19:16 82:8 broadly250:9 brought134:22 Bruce 69:7 BTU 109:15 110:22 130:18 BTUH 241:22 BTUs 149:7 227:4 build 180:1 234:12 building 1:14 105:2 159:12 177:12 185:3,5,10,12,13 213:13 buildings 232:16 246:9 built 62:2 65:5 72:7 136:18 235:11 bulb 31:18 40:12,13 41:2 53:6 bullet29:2 79:16 80:20 84:6 85:8 86:3,6,10 209:8 bullets 80:17 burden 68:1 150:9 247:1 burn 104:17 181:11 burners 13:21 business 67:4 123:7 butt242:1 button 43:3 92:1 buttons 43:14 buy69:15 152:3 153:1 buy-in 200:22 bypass 43:17 125:5,6 212:16 213:3 C cabinet20:21 25:4 53:19 cabinets 65:20 calculate60:12 calculating 221:15 calculation 15:12 21:6 61:15 83:21 calculations 23:5 62:3 Canada 21:13 22:4 cans 13:22 capabilities 156:15 capability64:4 141:13 187:4 capacitor165:20 166:1 capacitors 165:19 228:12 235:19 236:6 capacity 13:17 14:7,9 110:21 113:3 122:7 127:8 136:19 146:14 149:5,7,8 184:12 190:10 212:22 226:19,21 capacity-wise 234:9 Capital1:21 capture61:11 captured102:13 care81:21 130:5 146:1 201:18,19 254:3 carefully40:12 Carrier 2:14 3:21 6:19 9:6 111:17 124:16 141:1 carry 22:3 cascade70:18 case31:21 48:12,14,17 51:17,18,19 54:12,13,15,19 61:22 62:5 63:11 64:15 66:5 67:13 69:11 82:13 84:2 86:18 87:6,7 89:13 92:16,19,21 93:11,21 96:12,14 97:2 102:12 114:6 117:2,10 141:1,14 145:2 147:14 155:17 168:21 181:2 183:8 199:4 200:19 204:14,20 205:11,15 206:4 213:6 251:5 cases 28:3,11 41:7 48:14 51:2,8,9,11,15,2 0 54:4,9,22 55:20 62:9 63:1,9,19 65:1 92:4,13,14,15,17 93:10,22 97:8 101:11 102:1 113:2 141:4,10,19 203:15Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 8

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 catalog178:19 188:7 203:2 209:10,12 227:9 catch 123:11 189:13 catches 123:9 catching123:8 categories 250:9 category 55:9 78:10 178:15 180:5 230:18 258:6 caught91:22 189:7 cause 1:7 109:11,18 caveat 187:13 CCD 83:21 84:2 ceiling 243:13 central 49:1 82:12 certain 31:4 39:17 53:22 56:19 63:1 70:11,12 74:5 195:4 198:17 201:15 226:10 245:15 250:10 certainly 13:15 47:9 147:11 183:13 225:7,11 CERTIFICATE 263:1 264:1 265:1 certification 60:3 150:9 170:5 196:5 247:1 certifications 56:2 certified 146:20 certify150:13 157:1 169:15 197:11 224:11 263:5 264:3 265:3 certifying224:2 cetera 245:2 CFM 220:15 CFR 41:11 132:11 218:16,17 chamber 31:17 chance 47:20 222:4 237:6 259:10 chances 31:8 change 16:18,20 29:1 35:4 38:13 44:11 55:8 81:5 84:21 85:21 105:11 112:11 120:19 137:17,18 139:1 141:7,19 170:18 192:2,12 207:8,21 208:1,11 210:11 258:22 changed 12:20 36:13 44:15 79:17 128:19 149:22 173:11 208:5,8 209:8 changes 22:2 133:5 141:12 192:8 236:14 changing 139:15 174:1 195:8 199:14,17 206:19 207:13 characteristic 54:3 characteristics 9:5 10:2 11:4 13:12,16 15:18 18:20

characterized 77:10 Charles 2:17 3:22 Charlie 19:20 21:11 23:13,22 24:12 25:10 27:6 28:8 29:19 32:1,6 33:14 34:5 39:4 43:11 44:8 55:2 74:2 80:19 81:6 82:3,5 87:22 88:1 90:16 99:9 101:11 102:17 104:3 105:9,12,13 250:19,20 251:7 check 46:6 146:9 183:10 chemicals 250:6 chime234:4 choices 64:16 choose 193:12 chooses 248:16,18 chosen 252:21 chunks 137:10 circuit91:14 212:22 circuited68:20 circuiting141:2 circuits 91:12,14 circulate185:12 circumstance 248:18 claim169:17 171:9 240:10 claimed240:11 clarification 13:15 15:21 17:13 28:21 35:8 36:11 39:9 89:17 98:1 133:13 165:2 167:16 169:8 174:3 226:11 231:18 237:15 245:21 clarifications 47:21,22 clarified 10:4 92:9 clarifies 97:17 clarify21:21 25:11 62:22 90:17 97:18 132:18 172:3 192:11 195:10 237:12 clarifying 91:2 131:6 133:22 226:21 236:15 class 110:16 111:20 112:14,22 117:7,11 118:11 127:3 130:7,14 131:14 132:4,15,16,18,2 0,21 133:1,3,4,15 146:2 158:8 179:10 180:5 181:8 240:11 245:14 classes 113:1 128:4 130:11 133:18 134:2 183:8 classroom232:9 233:12 classrooms 231:9 clause 10:1Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 9

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 clean 111:18 191:13 195:3 Cleanable 120:13 cleaned 120:10,11 123:2,10 clear40:17 74:1 128:16 203:6 clearer 131:3 clearly252:5 CLEMENT 253:3,9 Clements 2:22 6:22 149:18 245:20 246:4 close 136:22 163:19 202:12 207:4 214:5 246:2 247:15 closed 47:14 54:4 185:1 186:3 closely178:13 closer142:21 230:4,12 closing 74:21 clue 66:5 190:17 coal116:4 117:22 142:9 161:7,10 coarse123:1 coast233:9 250:3 coat163:13 coated90:10,11 115:9 116:4 117:5 118:13 142:9,22 143:5 151:3,5 161:7,9,17 162:6,14,15,16 164:18 228:12 229:16 233:8,10 234:16,19 240:13 241:10 244:3,18,19 245:12 246:14 247:8 248:13,19 249:1,11 250:1,9,13 252:11,13,20 coating115:12 117:21 118:7 161:4 162:1,2 163:8 250:15 coatings 90:11 249:5 coats 163:15 coefficient82:11 cognizant225:6 coil87:16 90:17 109:5 115:4,9,10 118:7,16 136:8 142:10,20 143:5,7,8 144:4,13 145:1 147:22 148:10 149:8,11,14 153:16,17 161:1,2,18 162:2,3,15 164:10,18 166:8 176:22 177:6,7,8 178:2,4 179:1,19 180:9 181:12 182:2 184:9 185:5,12 190:22 191:3 212:20,21 213:1 214:19,20 227:18 233:8,10 234:17 241:4 244:18 249:1,5,11 coils 90:10,11,12,14 110:19,20 115:3,6,9,13

116:11,12 117:5,16 118:13 127:6,7 136:9 142:22 144:18 145:17 147:9,10,12,14 151:4,6 152:20 158:17 161:1 162:5 165:9 190:21 228:12 229:16 234:19 240:19 244:3,19 245:12 246:14 247:8 248:14,20 250:2,5,9,13 252:11,13,20 258:8 cold 74:18,20 101:15 154:12 collaboration 72:1 Collin 3:8 7:17 23:9 36:17 column 187:8 combination 137:5 242:21 243:1 combine 34:19 combined 130:12 comes 66:18 67:14 107:5 139:19 144:17 147:19 148:17 175:10 193:6 208:14 261:17 comfortable 16:6 44:19 80:5 114:22 163:22 coming 55:17 60:2 91:8 125:2 134:6 158:16 160:4 173:17 181:15 192:21 200:15 command152:18

comment 15:15 16:2 25:20 48:8 69:7 76:6 77:15 78:4,7 95:22 105:6 108:21 118:17 128:19 164:6 171:15,17,21 177:4 181:10 202:21 230:15 233:1 249:7 251:16 comments 9:11 11:6 13:13 18:13 19:1 21:10 33:5,18 39:3 74:3 85:7 87:1,10,20 89:5,18 90:15 93:2 95:19 96:20 97:5 98:16 99:3 102:7 111:1 115:7,15 124:7,14 127:9 131:13 133:7 136:11 138:11 144:12 165:6,17 166:3,12 167:2,14 173:11 176:11 177:2 179:20 183:1 184:18 185:20 213:7 215:3 216:3 227:21 230:11 235:3,19 236:6,9,19 237:7,16,19 238:12 240:8 241:16 243:7 244:6 250:12 254:12 255:2 257:14 commerce156:22Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 10

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 commercial 8:21,22 10:21,22 13:7 16:12 18:16 38:17 116:18 127:1,14 132:21 133:3 134:15 191:2,5 226:19 228:19 230:13,19 232:16 238:2 244:10,21 245:2,22 246:6,8,12 255:11,14 259:21 committed 31:19 committee 1:5 187:2 192:16 262:13 committing24:22 25:7 common 51:5 94:15,17 127:8 commonly

251:10 communication 72:2 233:6 companies 103:17 company1:21 6:18 122:20 178:14 260:7 comparable 110:18,19,20 137:13 139:3,17 148:17 153:19,21 176:5,9 240:13 comparably127:5 153:19 compare 142:8,13 157:15 compared 22:18 compensate 103:21 105:19 competing 231:15 complete 78:16 264:8 265:8 completely22:1 75:22 133:20 192:12 complex 225:7 compliance 190:14 complicated 61:18 223:9 component168:16 242:3 257:19 components 97:13 113:12 127:18 140:15 166:15,22 236:20 257:18 compressor98:20 102:5 103:20 104:12,15,16,17 109:6,7,8,12,13 173:15 174:5,7,9,11,19, 20 175:17 compressors 110:19 114:9,17 127:6 212:19 computer4:7 12:9,11 238:14 239:18 240:12 241:10 computer's 30:4 conceivably92:3 conceived231:6 concept 219:12 221:8 238:8 conception 231:5 concepts 34:20 130:13 238:19 concern 14:16 26:9 44:11 45:7 55:16 62:20 193:20,21 concerned27:10 124:16 206:17 208:10,16 concerns 4:22 10:17 31:7 44:16 90:9 95:11 97:15 154:17 159:18 165:6 183:1 186:9 213:20 214:14 239:19 243:5 258:1 concluded 262:14 condensate29:6 30:16 32:8,13 33:10,11 35:3 45:12 56:9,19 61:9 74:9,10 214:21 condensation 53:18 54:7 74:19 condenser 87:13,16 115:3 117:22 136:8 168:11,12,13,15 169:1 170:10 171:5 227:17 237:1 238:22 241:4 242:2 256:13 condensers 87:14 condensing 89:2 91:16 92:3 103:16 104:11 110:19 127:6 condition 50:11 70:15 85:15 104:15 144:11 158:7,10 176:6,10 222:7,18 conditioner82:12 115:4 127:15 conditioners 4:8 142:2 conditioning 2:10,13,15 6:21 41:9 54:16 67:9 127:2 239:19 conditions 31:12 39:18,20 40:20 41:5 42:11,16 44:6 50:16,19 52:19 53:5,8,15,16,20 54:1,22 56:19 57:16 58:12 59:17 61:3,4 63:13,14,17 65:8,16 67:3,6,11,13,15, 19 68:9,12,17 71:1,2,9 72:19,20 75:5 77:9 98:21 104:9,16 105:1,15 106:2 108:8 165:10 201:16 202:13 238:14 configuration 60:17 configurations 78:10 confirmed162:7 conflict21:13,15 confuse 42:5 confused 31:8 99:6 127:12 128:20Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 11

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 131:5 195:16 confusing 130:9 connected 50:15,16 60:9 98:10,14 167:6 connection 165:21 167:7 conscious 158:1 consensus 45:18 200:15 consequence 174:13 consequently 13:18 conservative22:13 23:3 83:22 conservatively 22:14,21 26:12,16 consider5:9 40:2 99:14 157:9,13 245:22 246:5 259:11 262:4 consideration 33:17 considered 34:9 181:3,7,14 226:10 considering 37:21 consistency113:10 consistent16:17 25:12 36:20 127:20 consistently 119:19 constrained 232:5 constraint155:18 231:21,22 constraints 122:14

constructed74:15 construction 54:4 74:14 137:15 142:19 232:9 233:11 consulting 251:11 consumed62:6 consumer

133:4 148:3 consumption 18:21 21:2 22:12 26:6 73:22 89:13 249:4 consumptive44:3 contact 195:21 contain 97:8 137:14 containing 91:15 contaminants 97:2 content 166:16 context 128:10 continue 219:9 252:4 Continued 3:1,2 continuing 26:8 continuous 92:16 115:12 161:4 control22:8 41:3 42:14 43:16 44:5 48:18 50:2 51:8,10,14 52:14,21 54:18 57:4,20 58:14 59:4 60:8,15 65:22 66:6 67:8,16 69:11,12,14 72:7,9,14 73:12,13,16 76:1

77:5,7 81:2 99:1 100:1,10,15 101:16 102:2 142:10 144:3 157:11 174:21 204:8 controlled51:21 52:4 57:17,19 61:5 controller38:22 39:5,14,15,17,19 40:3,4,11 42:20 50:12,15,17 51:2,19 52:11 56:21 57:3,7,12,15,21 58:10 59:2,15 60:4,6,16 61:8,16,18,22 62:2,14,17,20 64:11,16 65:17 67:14 68:16 70:6,8 71:10,11,12 72:3 75:17,18,19 77:8,13 79:19 84:10,15 85:10,13,14,16,1 8 86:1 99:13 controllers 40:10 43:12 48:17 55:21 56:18 58:8 62:13,17 64:20,21 65:2 70:18 75:15 controller's 57:10 60:21 83:13 controlling 48:15 controls 51:7 52:4 57:11 69:9 70:12 73:22 controversial 212:15

conversation 23:12 82:10 conversations 23:7 convey130:16 convinced 226:3 cool31:14 155:5 coolant91:11,13 cooled 91:15 92:2 135:5 239:4 259:6 cooling 110:21 113:2,3,16 114:10 127:8 128:10,11,15 149:5,6,8 154:10,12 155:9 158:17 178:6 184:10,12 212:17 226:18,21 233:5 238:20 242:3 256:5,6 cooper227:17 copper115:2,5 136:8,9 137:14 139:2,11,16 141:5,7,14 142:2,12 143:5,7,21 144:4,13,18 145:2 146:17 147:10,12,22 148:15 151:4,6,13,18 152:4 161:1 241:10 copy35:9 173:22 222:1 copy/paste 91:9 copying 254:19Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 12

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 core246:7 Corey 7:16 corner92:16 Corporation 3:15 correct28:19 37:14 46:16 64:2,14 66:21 72:3 73:1 80:4 91:3 94:6,7 100:13 104:16 129:10 130:20 134:3,5 160:2,4 167:18,19 174:17 180:11 183:2 195:1 231:21 236:16 239:5 245:11,12 248:11 264:7 265:8 corrected 147:12 correction 165:19 175:15 180:20 194:5 228:12 235:18 236:6 correctly14:1 28:13 70:2 97:19 179:16 219:20 corrosion 115:13 116:5 161:5 162:7,12 corrosive 161:19,21 240:15 cost141:20 178:20 179:2 248:12,19 Counsel3:4 count141:2,7 countdown 76:17 counted 97:14 179:17 counterpart 226:4 couple 38:2 135:4 162:18 173:9 196:15 251:22 259:7 262:1 course140:13 224:5 Court263:1,3,16 264:3,6 265:4,6 cover18:7 19:12 43:6 129:3 217:15 224:18 248:13,17 covered19:13 110:15 111:19 115:11 127:3 128:21,22 161:3 239:15 247:13 covering128:14 162:3 166:8 258:9 covers 89:1,4,11,12 232:14,17 CPR 104:21 109:4 crack 226:7 239:22 cracks 227:1 242:5 crankcase98:19 99:8 101:15 103:10 107:20,21 CRE 18:15 19:10 20:9,18 41:6 91:3,4 92:7 99:6 103:6 116:9,10 create102:18 103:2 146:2 creative225:12 credit44:7 critical144:11

criticism223:18 CSA2:19 CSI 251:8 curious 36:21 current 92:18 102:13 157:4 183:6 192:8 217:17 currently 80:21 86:12 89:15 192:9 curtains 89:11,12 curtains/covers 89:10 curves 109:14 224:16 custom120:7 customer20:19 27:1 32:11 54:21 74:11 76:2 122:18 145:16,18 147:8 customer-driven 122:3 customers 20:20 26:14 55:20 69:8 86:16 104:1 153:11 205:2 225:13 customs 235:11 cycle59:9,19 Cymbalsky 2:4 7:13 33:7 43:4 46:14,17 47:1,12 48:6 84:20 85:1,3 91:9 126:16 149:21 154:21 161:16 182:21 213:22 228:1,16 244:14

cynic 40:9 D D.C 1:16 8:13 Daikin 3:11 7:19 damage106:6 166:9 damn 158:3 dampeners 253:20 damper 185:1 186:2 214:4,5,6 dampers 184:22 185:7 186:1,2,7 214:4,12 256:5,7,11 damper-type 256:9 Dane 2:21 6:15 50:1,6,18 65:4,18 66:9 69:16,22 70:9,20 danger76:5 dash 79:17 data30:11 37:20 146:8,11 156:9 191:10 218:14 224:15 date 4:4 138:22 139:10 192:18 264:13 265:14 dated 182:13 Dave3:5 8:4 227:3 230:17 231:19 day92:6 135:8,11 148:17 200:8 204:1 250:6 days 37:12 51:6Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 13

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 deadline 79:1 deal5:11 28:4 64:20 77:14 79:14 104:7 105:18 171:6 245:13 262:8 dealing 38:16 216:14 245:5 262:7 dealt254:10 debris 166:9 December 79:1,10,13 197:12 decent123:8 decibels 213:15 decide 59:16 72:9 76:13 118:14 190:14 decided 71:13 decides 148:5 decision 72:22 122:9 208:21 229:11 235:7 260:20 decision-making 93:6 decline 210:6 decorative 124:9,10,13 125:8,11,19 126:10 deduct179:11,12 180:9 deduction 180:6 deeper28:9 default 53:2 82:13 83:4,13 190:13 194:4,5,8 199:12 206:22 208:15 209:21 254:5 defer129:1 define 39:5,8 52:16,19,21 53:1,17 55:6 122:6 132:3 133:19 162:14 200:4 defined 53:6 77:3,4 132:5,6 159:12 defining 55:7 definite 219:5,8 definitely 52:21 170:19 219:4 249:3 definition 8:21 10:5,7,20 11:10,16 12:21 13:7 15:3 17:11 18:15 19:10,15,16 110:12 112:17,20 126:22 130:2 144:10 151:1 153:17 161:7,9,11,17 183:2 226:17 240:3 242:17,21,22 definitions 20:11 74:5 131:22 239:19 259:8 deflection 125:3 defrost29:8 33:12 51:13 Degitz3:7 7:15 degradation 82:11 118:2 degrade155:21

degree53:6 degrees 38:2 99:15,18 dehumidification 158:15 166:15,22 236:20 257:18,19 258:3 deice 167:6 delete18:21 deliver176:16 215:9 224:6 delivered 127:19 182:18 212:17 delta74:17 121:16 deluxe 147:15 Department 1:2,12 2:4,5,6 14:17 24:18 75:11 138:13,17 151:20 164:15 167:11 173:8 191:22 193:3,10,12 212:8 223:12 241:3 Department's 11:18 24:5 43:22 52:8 68:15 72:13 93:15 118:9 139:21 157:9 193:22 240:18 244:16 dependence 190:10 dependent122:7 depending 234:12 249:12 deposition 163:8 depth 124:2

deregulating 146:4 describe 30:1 described 189:17 describes 243:4 describing 17:4 147:4 180:19 181:5 217:10 description 96:18 108:4,6 110:3 113:17 174:10 175:9 176:4 180:11,12,15,19 182:12,14 203:4 257:21 258:6 descriptive250:15 desiccant166:19 desiccants 166:18 design 32:14 53:8 63:14 67:1,2 91:14 92:17 137:18,19 139:2,9,12,14 140:17 141:19 142:18 146:6,12,18 147:7,13 216:18 designed 56:17,18,20 61:5 63:3,11 99:6 108:8 109:6 121:18 122:18 147:6 168:12 231:8 232:5 designs 73:20 116:16 140:1 216:18 235:10 details 25:15 58:19 146:11,12 determinationCapital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 14

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 62:4 115:19 116:6 163:2 determine 16:19 36:22 80:15 242:20 develops 247:18 device 41:20 42:15 103:15,19 104:1 106:21 devices 63:6 80:16 89:1 devil's 196:14 Diane 3:17 7:21 193:7 Dick 189:7 dictionary161:16 die 141:6 difference 15:13 22:17 33:17 81:10 83:12,15 116:15 118:14 121:17 133:2 137:21 141:18 142:11 148:20 differences 14:17 different 9:4 10:1 11:11 12:11 13:21,22 15:11,15,16,18,1 9,22 32:5,7,8,13 49:4 50:19 61:14 65:6 73:15,16 75:5 83:6 96:18 115:18 116:5,16 117:11 128:6 129:8,17 130:11,12,16 134:8 137:12 139:18 140:1,17,18 146:18,19 155:7 158:8,9 161:9 163:15 170:10,11,20 171:5,6,8 175:3 193:19 194:15 197:17 201:7 226:11,15 228:16,22 230:3 232:15 233:14 234:11,14,15 240:6 241:6,7 244:15,20 differentiate 81:12 170:2 differentiation 246:6 differently 115:22 116:20 117:7 174:20 193:3,5 229:13 230:9 235:7 difficult21:12 136:2 digital77:7 81:15 263:16 digitally44:1 digits 244:11 diligently192:17 direct21:13,15 66:1 90:4 113:8 159:10 220:21,22 direction 75:14 263:7 directly123:4 185:2,9 direct-to-indirect 155:4 dirt123:2 dirty123:2 disagree80:13 91:20 disallow 14:3,6 disappointed 234:22 discharge 187:9 212:19 discharged 256:12 disconnected 56:5 166:2 discretion 11:18 discuss 115:20 150:5 251:4 discussed 74:6 78:9 103:10 104:2 135:6,10 186:17,22 187:2 190:18 229:1 259:22 discussing 65:11 78:20 discussion 56:7,15 115:17 120:4 127:21 144:7 157:8 189:6 193:17 207:8 209:20 227:7 235:14 249:9 252:7,10 discussions 29:17,18 135:12 138:22 139:9 discussion's 128:17 144:16 dispense 95:15 display 20:19 21:19 24:15 27:1 48:14 51:20 81:15 96:12 displayed 21:4 displaying 25:2

displays 24:10 87:5 distinct229:13 distinguish 128:4 143:18 distinguished 113:2 distribute 156:22 dive 28:9 diverted212:19 division 243:11 document

134:19 documented 71:4 documents 168:7 DOE 7:11,12,13 14:5 16:6 21:1 22:2,15 23:6 26:8,21 28:12 33:12 38:20 53:7 56:15 77:3,12,16,21 78:13,15 79:10,22 80:6 86:18 87:16 89:2,16 90:6 91:18 93:6,20 94:22 95:1,17 97:2,10 102:13 109:20 112:5 115:5,13 119:8 124:4 128:14 129:1 133:1 137:9 148:6 149:3 150:4,14 153:1,16 154:12 159:14 161:5 164:4 165:13,21 166:10,19 167:10 168:17 176:19 184:14Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 15

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 185:6,16,17 186:6 188:4 204:15,16 205:11,18,21 208:18 210:13 213:2 214:10 215:1 231:1 235:9 DOE-approved 163:6 DOE's 23:12 79:8 128:14 150:7 163:22 215:12 229:11 done 23:3,8 32:10 46:3 74:13 103:6,8 116:9 158:14 192:3,19 248:20 256:8 259:5 door21:20 40:4 49:18 53:18 55:7,9,14,15 63:1 66:4 74:7,9,12,13,15, 16,19,21 75:4,19,21 doors 38:18,19 48:12 56:20 66:15,16,17 73:20,22 75:3 double-regulated 129:17 downers 37:4 downstream 114:12 166:1 184:9 draft21:22 drain 32:20 33:12 draw25:4 238:21 drawn 186:4 draws 185:13 drier41:8 drip 214:21 drive 220:21,22 224:8 driven 129:20 130:1 220:21 223:2 drives 176:15 215:9 223:7 drop 96:17 109:11 119:18 120:1,5 121:9,13,19 122:4,6,11 129:13 138:6,8 187:22 190:5 195:5 198:17 199:12 200:5,21 201:1,15,18 202:14 207:15 208:4 210:21 dropped 201:2 dropping 252:8 drops 63:7 103:18 156:16 160:14,16 dry30:6,14 31:10,18 40:12 41:2 duct214:6 243:14 ducted 168:18,22 169:1,2 172:22 ducting 168:12,13 170:9,22 171:2 due 97:13 dummy59:14 60:6 durability161:19 162:7 during 30:20 33:13 34:10 35:10 38:21 39:22 42:10,13 56:9,22 60:13 71:8 75:22 76:21 87:9,18 89:14 95:18 97:4,12 99:1,20 100:7 106:2 133:6 154:12 166:11 184:10 185:7 187:6 225:19 242:11 249:17 254:19 dust123:8,9,11 duty59:9,19 E e.g9:3 11:2 13:10 earlier55:13 56:7 83:3 127:21 128:19 Earthjustice2:11 75:9 ease181:10 easier17:20 151:10 easily15:4 22:20 241:4 257:2 easy10:14 225:8 ECM220:22 223:4,8,9,17,18 224:6,12,14 225:9 ECMs 223:12,14,16 238:11 Eco 163:9,10 economizer 155:4,6 243:9,20,22 260:13,19,22

261:2,8 economizers 154:9,15 156:19 227:20 238:21 243:21 251:17 economizing 154:21 243:19 Economy 3:4 Ed 76:7 edge 45:12 Edison 3:20 8:8 46:3 edit254:16,18 EE-2J1:7 EER 175:16 179:12 180:6,9 effect118:4 206:19 220:6 effectively102:18 142:3 147:21 156:10 effects 161:20 efficiencies 216:13 218:15 efficiency9:5 11:5 13:12,17 15:7 16:16,17 106:1 109:13,18 128:15 129:8 136:22 146:1 149:16 158:9 162:13 174:16 178:22 179:18 186:12 188:7 190:4 193:14 203:7 206:20 215:14,18 216:7,11,22 217:10,12 218:1,5,8,10Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 16

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 219:22 220:3,8 221:18,19,20 222:11 224:15,17 237:13 247:11 253:20 efficient3:4 102:20 137:16 170:11 171:9 175:18 216:17,19 217:2 219:14,15 223:10,13 224:3 eight190:21 234:18 248:4 Eiser6:14 Eisner2:3 4:2,22 5:17 6:3,12,14 7:18 8:15,17 9:10,14 10:11,17 11:6,22 12:4,8,16 13:5,13 18:12 19:1,4,8 20:1,17 21:7,10 29:1,14 33:5,10,18 34:13 36:9,12 38:13 39:3 42:1 43:18 44:10,15,21 45:3 46:7,9,11,16,18, 20 48:8 58:16 59:21 69:7 76:6,17 79:16 80:5,9,13 81:6,8 85:7 86:2,12 87:1,10,20 88:1,19 89:5,9,18 90:2,8,15,22 91:10,20 92:13 93:2 95:11,19 96:20 97:5,15 98:12,16 99:3 102:7,15 103:5 105:6 108:20 109:2 110:8,11 111:1,10,16 112:1,6 114:21 115:7,15 118:17 123:21 124:7,14 125:10,13,22 126:11,15,19,21 127:9 131:1,9 133:7,12,21 134:9 136:11,14 138:10 151:11,17,22 152:5,10,13,17 153:22 154:3,6,17 159:3,6,18 160:20 162:10 163:21 165:6,17 166:3,12 167:2,14,21 168:8 172:20 173:4,10 176:11 177:2,13 179:20 182:10 183:1 184:3,6,18 185:20 186:9 211:13,16 212:9 213:7,20 214:2,14 215:3 216:3 222:3 225:14,22 226:2,22 227:15 228:5 230:14 231:1,3 233:3 235:3,14 236:2,5,19 237:16 238:12 239:18 240:4 241:13,16 243:5,15 244:1,6,12 245:10 249:6 250:12,21 251:16 252:9,15 253:2,8,10,14,19

254:12,21 255:2,18,21 257:14 258:1,22 259:4 either19:21 25:20 61:6 64:16 65:20 78:5 143:9 152:16 177:6 198:16 209:11,15 221:5 237:19 241:19 258:4 electing72:14 electric2:16,22 3:20 6:18 7:1 8:9 29:7 110:17 127:5 128:5 129:9 176:20 177:4,7 178:16,18 179:4 181:20 182:1 218:3 246:5 253:4 255:6 electrical8:11 11:3 13:11 18:19 97:9 105:20 electrically129:20 130:1,3 167:6 electricity127:17 electrodisposition 162:1 electronic51:7 electrum 163:8 element35:6 eligible 90:14 115:6,14 116:11 117:16 245:6 eliminate154:11 else 33:18 48:15,18 49:14 51:21 59:21 64:21

66:4,6,18 67:3 68:8 86:2 89:9 90:22 95:3 123:10,21 151:13 157:16 163:21 167:21 168:8 177:19 184:6 211:13 231:12 email191:12 emits 214:19 employed 263:9 emptied 34:12 enabled 35:20 87:8 enables 154:10 encourage25:22 56:13 82:20 116:19 192:22 223:15,16 endorse 189:22 end-to-end51:20 energized34:1 35:4,19 97:12 98:9 100:8 energy 1:2,12 2:4,5,6 3:4 9:3,5 11:2,4 13:9,12,17 15:11 18:18,20 21:2,5,14 22:1,3,12,16,18 23:6 26:6,15 49:2 51:7 57:18 62:6 63:8 65:15 69:10 70:21 71:11 73:3 89:13 92:21 95:2 106:1 109:15 110:17 127:4 129:8 130:14 146:1Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 17

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 158:9 159:8 165:11 246:18 247:2 249:4 enforcement 154:13 159:14 161:5 164:5 165:13 166:20 184:14 185:16 213:2,17 214:10 engage67:17 engineer146:6,13 engineering 146:8,11 147:6 156:9 187:2 192:16 engineers 251:11 engines 114:17 220:4 enhanced 41:8 156:14 enormous 83:14 ensure 205:19 ensures 79:21 80:11 enter212:21 entered238:19 entering159:10 213:14 Enterprises 3:5 entire30:6,7 35:11 55:5 59:13 76:3 83:8 115:10,11 161:2,3 232:21 entirely115:5 entrant 17:15 environment 32:16 44:7 74:18 84:10 157:20 240:15 environmental 50:16 57:16 77:9 190:15 environments 32:9 41:8 90:13 99:11 117:1 161:22 251:9,12 EPA 55:17 E-PAC 216:20 epoxy162:1 epoxy-type163:8 equilibrium 37:5 equipment

18:17 29:7 38:17 45:19 68:4,5 69:9 70:1 97:10 119:3 130:11 131:14 132:3,14,21 133:1,3,4,15,17 134:1 137:10 158:8 159:10,13 165:10,21 168:16 176:18 182:17 184:13 185:14 186:4,16 187:1 190:20,21 191:2,5 212:17 213:12,14 214:6,22 215:11 229:5 230:18 231:16 235:11 240:12,14 244:20 245:16 260:9 equipment's 98:3 165:10 167:7 equipped 67:21 equitable 52:10,12,18 206:13 equitably57:6 equivalent162:22 163:1,6 164:1,11 181:4 210:13 256:18 ERV160:1,17 especially21:19 203:16 260:8 essential147:6 174:6 essentially11:3 13:10 18:19 72:8 142:20 144:2 149:15 175:5 establish 47:10 established 95:5 establishing 117:11 et245:1,2 evaluate223:4 evaluated 118:12 evaporate29:8 evaporated45:13 238:20 evaporation 32:19 evaporative242:2 evaporatively 135:5 239:4 259:6 evaporator

109:5 110:20 115:3 123:5 127:7 136:8 153:16,17 169:10,11 213:1 227:17 240:14 241:8,10 250:5 257:19,20 evening 238:1 eventually199:18 everybody

9:11 10:18 17:16 29:1

38:13 42:1 43:18 44:10,21 55:18 110:12 133:8 183:3 189:14 253:16 everybody's 5:3 189:11 everyone4:11,15 188:20 252:3 everyone's 6:8 127:22 everything5:3 17:15 25:3 110:6 145:5 219:15 229:17 exact 40:15 67:18 107:13 117:19 137:19 142:18 145:1 211:4 221:11 exactly 25:17 33:15 39:10 60:16,20 73:11 77:22 80:3 141:1,3 149:16 170:14 172:6 179:8 228:14 230:21 258:20 262:9 example 54:15 117:2 141:3 144:22 148:14 157:15 179:9,13 215:20 221:15 233:4 examples 166:18 exceed216:10 Excel256:2 excellent 161:19 except 30:3 148:14Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 18

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 151:18 212:15 exception 229:16 230:8 235:9 244:19 245:3 exceptions 9:21 10:6 238:20 259:16 excess 53:19 exchange15:17 155:5 159:11 160:3 exchanger15:5,6 137:14 138:19 139:2 140:13,16,19 165:9 182:16 184:9 exchangers 15:16,17 142:2 exclude 114:10 137:9 157:12 256:22 excluded 23:1 173:1 223:6 exclusion 106:17 144:3 exclusions 19:11 78:13 137:13 140:3 240:21 Excuse 10:9 49:21 61:21 238:17 exempt223:14 248:8 exempted 250:17 exempting 244:10 250:9 exhaust159:11 160:4 185:9,16,18 exhausted 159:12

exhausting 160:2 exhaustive 114:15 exhibit215:16 exist32:21 existing 26:17 91:17 93:1 112:12 192:11 237:14 expansion 91:16 expect 92:9 201:15 expectation32:8 expensive 75:3 145:20 experience206:21 207:1 experts 46:6 explain 50:9 103:12 149:9 240:21 255:6 explained 28:13 138:21 explanation 109:4 235:6 explanations 226:9 256:3 259:9 explicit17:5 168:1 explicitly14:2,6 17:2 28:17 105:10 127:17 168:6 174:21 explore191:18 export 105:16 exposed 250:5 Extended 124:3 extent 17:3,5 28:18 130:15 135:10 206:8,9

231:11,13,15 exterior 20:20 external 21:17 58:14 96:5,7 165:11 168:13 176:16 191:19 203:16 205:8 215:10 extra27:12 38:18 55:1,3 63:20 145:22 179:1 extreme 45:20 63:16 extremely216:17 219:13 251:1 F F85 162:21 fabricated 115:4 face 211:9 facilitator2:3 6:14 facility53:11 55:21 fact30:3 83:12 95:12 105:19 158:3 162:16 193:8 factor30:20 165:20 194:5 factored248:9 factors 191:20 factory187:5 Fahrenheit 99:15,18 fair 83:20 224:10 229:15 fairly82:8 99:11 118:2 121:13 123:8 130:4

131:15 fall 78:10 258:5 260:9 falls 87:7 falsely106:5 family-type11:15 fan 138:6,7 156:16 167:5,7 168:11,12,15 170:10 171:5 173:14 174:1,10 176:15,16,17 177:11 185:8,9,13 186:4 215:8,9,10 225:8 237:1 238:22 fans 160:16 Farr 201:5 fast200:12 faster154:19 228:3 fault 239:9 favor111:10 feasible 207:3 feature 39:1 106:18 108:16 109:22 110:7 features 16:11 20:18 38:17 87:8 115:2 116:16 185:8 227:17 234:15 240:6 featuring 91:14 federal1:5 215:18,21 216:2,5 217:7,15 219:16,17 220:2,17 262:13Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 19

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 feel18:2 229:16 244:18 246:20 249:15 felt28:2 191:8 FEMALE 20:7 41:12,15,17 42:22 88:8,12,14,17 96:4 112:4,8 144:19 180:22 240:2 252:14 fewer217:6,9 field 16:7 48:22 57:8 67:19 73:14 76:4 79:21 80:11,15 82:20 118:5 155:22 195:14 207:1 216:22 223:13 248:20 249:1,4 fight 85:2 figure 24:21 117:20 262:10 figured 25:5 62:15 file 164:9 fill 92:15 110:2 filled 31:9 filter88:4,5 118:22 119:6,10 120:7,8,16 121:1,4,19 122:10,11,15,18 123:1 186:13 187:7 188:5 189:5,15,18 190:22 191:4 193:14,15 194:11,12,13,14, 15 195:4,13,14,17,1 9,22 196:6,12,17,18 198:1,9,14,16,17 199:1,8 200:19,20 201:15,22 202:3,15 203:1,7,9,13,15, 16,19 204:2,17,20 205:3,6,8,13,14, 20,22 206:10,11,14,17, 18 207:9,11,16,18,1 9 208:2,14 209:22 210:1 211:11 237:14 254:4 filters 87:13,14,17,19 118:22 121:21 122:2 123:7,12,15,20 125:15 186:13 187:5 188:12 191:13,15 194:8 195:2,3 198:8 199:7,9 205:1 207:15 208:8 filter's 203:14 filtration 118:22 119:1,2,4 186:13,14,15,17 187:3 190:3 191:6,9 193:11 202:3 203:5 208:6 237:13 253:20 254:17 fin 138:7 141:2,4,6,7 142:19 162:4,5 final 162:2 financial 263:10 finding 57:2 70:5 114:16

fine 5:13 27:4,9 28:2 34:21 47:16 63:22 68:21 69:2,4 86:22 92:5 113:6 135:15 136:3 137:22 172:11 218:2 227:11 238:7,9 253:3,4 255:1,2 finish 171:15 212:13 finishing 212:11 fins 115:11 139:15 142:19 149:19 161:3 fin-stamping 162:6 fire 214:3,11 firm 17:15 first6:3 10:14 11:8 29:2,4 79:6 80:17,20 81:21 84:7 130:6 135:13 136:2 156:21 208:6 209:6 230:17 233:17 237:13 251:17 fish 96:18 fit32:15 92:14 183:7 five 216:22 217:7 218:4,8 221:16 224:12 227:6 229:3 247:19,21,22 251:20 fixed 180:13 fixture 214:17 Fixtures 3:9 8:2 48:11 flat191:2 flexibility 15:4 18:7 137:17 Florida103:22 flour 87:13,15,19 88:3,4,7,9,10 flow 206:19,20 212:20 239:16 fluid 91:15 Fly 3:3 7:20 129:2,5,7,11 132:2,8,13 143:3,16 153:13 158:5,12 159:21 160:13 189:12,19 190:16 192:16 258:7,14,19 260:6,16 261:1,15 flying 166:9 focus 33:3 focusing 43:19 44:10 fog 74:22 75:4 76:2 fogged 76:1 fogging 73:21 foil 146:17,18 folks 82:3 Folsom1:21 263:3,16 fond 130:8 Food46:4 footage 142:20 footnote 146:9Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 20

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 152:10 force 103:19 208:7 foregoing 263:4 foregoing/ attached264:7 265:7 forget6:4 134:16 135:18 136:6 forgot133:14 forming56:10 formula55:5 Forrestal1:14 forth 4:20 forum 25:14 forward 46:17,18 48:2 160:11 209:3 fraction 41:4 82:14 116:22 117:5 137:7 178:10 233:16 fractional217:16 238:4 Frank 2:15 3:12 8:3 18:1 33:21 34:22 41:18 56:6 144:6 146:3,16,21 172:5 180:10 182:10 209:7 free 22:14 freedom138:19 FREEMAN5:22 freezing213:1 frequency167:8 213:16 223:7 frequent51:4 frequently75:11 fresh 95:16 186:1 243:17,19 253:20 fridge 76:7 full 30:19 31:9 42:12 193:4 fully 66:19 77:19 89:15 185:7 186:7 function 33:15 108:6 155:6 functional 9:4 10:1 11:4 13:11 18:20 66:20 140:1 functionality 96:9 127:18 functionally 68:16 fundamental 140:21 157:7 259:19 furnace 113:12 114:17 127:14 129:14,15 181:20 furnaces 8:22 9:1 10:8 113:22 114:2 future 207:14 G G85 162:20,22 165:4 251:1 gallons 15:9 16:14,19 17:9 18:3,4,5 game41:22 games 75:6 gamut 232:17 gap 92:15

garage101:13 gas 2:16 6:17 9:3 11:2 13:10 110:18 111:3,5,7 113:11,13,18,19, 22 114:2,3,4,9,12,1 6,17 127:5,17,19 128:5,9 129:9,11,12,13,1 5,22 165:12 179:11,17 181:4,7,16 183:8 184:8,15 212:16 213:3 258:7 gas-fired 111:6,8,12,14 gate156:21 general5:6 58:22 98:4 176:3 212:2 216:6 218:3 219:3,8 220:20 222:13 223:3 231:10 232:11 generalist45:10 generalized58:19 generally212:6 223:10 244:17 general-purpose 97:6,11,14 98:14 generate53:21 56:19 generated30:16 gets 54:6 55:14 63:4 72:15 84:19 123:2 138:21 215:4 225:7 getting53:14 91:8 100:6 142:17 158:22 195:16 gist84:19

given 10:22 13:8 93:8 110:15 111:19 127:3 128:21 180:20 198:20 201:14 215:13 240:11 gives 15:3 18:6 31:4 178:11 190:12 giving 21:12 195:5,6 227:22 glass 66:17 74:17,18 goal194:6 199:20,21 200:1 202:12 212:1 God151:7 going-in 148:22 gone 9:20 44:4 193:1 197:1 201:16 Goodman 2:8 5:5 7:8 91:2 114:1 117:18 122:13 123:14 129:21 162:18 175:15 Google114:16 gotten 151:5 180:22 262:3 grab 259:13 grain 65:7 gray123:18,19,20 great 105:18 123:12,15,16,17, 18 133:11 176:13 greater 15:9 17:8 119:1 168:14Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 21

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 186:14 greedy 253:13 grill126:16 grille 90:3 124:10,11,18,19 125:3,21 166:6 grilles 90:4,7 124:9,13 125:8,12,15 126:2,7 group 8:19 19:16 21:14 34:9 46:2 47:22 92:7 102:20 118:14 149:1 151:19 153:15 174:15 179:10 191:8 210:11 215:22 222:5 252:19 grouped 247:4 grouping 219:16 groups 23:5 growth 214:19 Guam54:16 guards 166:6,10 228:13 236:9 251:17 253:19 guess 14:21 20:4 26:4 50:13 59:17 77:20 85:9 93:6 99:5 106:20 117:22 127:11 129:21 133:13 140:8 146:22 154:22 163:7 169:9 202:22 212:14 219:18 221:5,7 231:4 242:19 245:2,20 248:6 250:5 guidance 21:2 24:20 25:21 26:22 55:22 78:5,6 80:1 83:17 86:18 87:17 89:3,16 90:6 91:19 95:17 97:3,11 102:14 119:6 124:4,12 154:13 159:14 161:5 164:4,5 165:13,22 166:10,20 167:10 168:7,17 176:19 184:14 185:6,16 186:6 187:21 188:2 192:10 193:2 194:10 195:4,6 196:4 212:7 213:2,17 214:10 215:1 257:12 259:17 guilty249:15 gut190:7 guy12:18 guys 12:6 23:18 25:22 27:17 33:7 47:20 50:8 51:1 52:1 59:4 115:16 118:14 154:19 183:6 197:7 201:13 225:16 242:12 259:9 261:22 262:1 H habit65:19 hail 166:6,9,10 228:12 236:9 Hailmeyer

69:8 half 17:16 249:5 half-baked 17:14 hand 76:19 190:2

handed 30:4 handle 4:19 76:14 173:18 193:3 handled 83:15 181:21 182:3 handling 34:6 handout 182:12,21 hands 233:22 hang 5:19 110:6 happen 79:3 99:10,12,21 142:16 happened 4:4 happens 64:18 220:19 246:1 happy 24:5 153:4,22 154:1 238:10 253:7 hard 25:14 157:19 201:10 240:12 harder104:14 hard-to-start 109:17 hardwired 65:20 69:2 harmful14:22 harmonizes 22:1 harsh 90:12 250:6 Harvey 3:4 6:16 11:9 13:14 14:12 15:14 16:5,22 17:12 18:11 31:14 32:6 40:8,14,21 44:18 45:9 47:8 70:4 82:7 83:7 99:4,5,9 111:2 113:9,15 116:21 121:22

127:10,12 133:9 136:20 138:12,20 140:7 156:1 158:5,20 175:14 190:17 191:11 200:7 215:4 231:3 232:3 234:2,21 254:22 Harvey's 61:8 157:15 181:10 213:21 223:1 hash 25:16 haven't12:7,20 18:9 74:6 137:4 151:5 180:22 189:7 249:10 258:11 having 11:1 13:9 15:19 18:18 19:4 22:21 23:11,12 31:15 61:22 62:3 66:1 110:3,17 127:4 130:14 137:13 138:21 144:3 150:9 220:14 252:5 head 177:14 221:21 headers 23:16,19 24:2,14,15 162:3 heading 75:14 88:3,13,14 heads 58:21 231:12 headway135:14 261:22 hear12:3 14:4 19:7 22:6 44:21 80:10 81:6 109:1 138:14 140:8Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 22

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 heard 23:14 35:19 48:6 56:7 68:15 173:10 210:10,22 226:9 229:3 249:10 hearing 2:10,15 19:5 32:22 45:18 55:3 65:18 66:2 122:1 220:19 heart181:10 heat5:7 13:18 15:5,6,10,15,16, 17 16:15,19 40:3 48:20 53:21 76:8 101:17 111:21 112:21 113:14,18,19 129:3,9 136:21 137:14 138:19 139:2,11 140:13,16,18 141:11,13,16 142:2 149:17 155:5 158:15 160:3 165:8,9 176:14,22 177:4,6,7,21 178:9,16,18 179:4,11,17,19 180:20 181:4,7,20 182:1,16,18 183:8 184:8 237:3 heated32:20 heater30:5 33:15 35:6 36:19 45:11,13 49:4 62:4 67:16,17 68:17 71:1 74:7 101:15 heaters 13:7,8 16:12 18:5 29:6,7,21 34:6,7 35:3,9 39:22 48:12,16,17,21 51:13 53:20 54:17,18 55:1,4,6,7,9,14 56:8 57:5 60:12 63:1,2,10,20,21 72:10 75:19,21 82:15 98:19,20 99:8 255:6 heating 35:6 111:14 113:22 114:2,4 127:12 128:9,11 176:20 177:10 178:11 181:12 183:15 heats 182:17 184:10 held 145:21 help 29:17 55:18 80:10 132:18 138:16 141:14 152:10,12,13,15 159:21 183:13 234:1 helpful 4:8 14:22 191:16 249:22 helping 233:15 helps 33:3 179:19 258:9 hereby263:4 264:3 265:3 here's 63:18 82:13 129:12 hers 139:5,11 hertz213:16 he's 12:17 50:18,22 62:10 65:11 83:19 142:17 152:15 153:4 181:11

248:11 Hey23:18 Hi145:14 high 38:17,19 49:18 63:13 158:15 184:11 186:12 193:8,14 203:7 212:18 215:7 237:13 253:20 258:7 High-efficiency 118:21 higher48:12 67:3,6,13 68:9 103:20,21 104:13 106:4 116:22 117:4 141:17 176:16 177:11 188:7 191:9 202:3 215:9 216:8,9 219:20,21 220:2,6,7,8,10,1 1 224:8,17,19,22 225:1,2 higher-rated 168:14 high-wattage 55:6 62:22 Hill 200:12 253:19 historically23:20 hit17:22 147:17 hits 58:5 hitting 92:1 201:18 hmm 205:4 hold 46:2 222:3 holding 74:3 154:5 hole 18:9

home252:17 253:17 homework

262:1 Hon 2:17 3:22 21:11,17 22:4,6,9,16 25:10 26:2 27:6,9,16,19,21 32:1,14 33:2,14 39:4,10 40:1 43:10,11,20 44:8 55:2 74:2 80:19 81:7 82:5 87:22 88:2,10 90:16,21 99:9,20 100:2,11,13 102:17,22 103:2 104:3 105:9,13,22 250:13 251:4 honestly212:7 hook 75:18 Hootman 2:20 7:10 113:15,21 114:2,15 125:5 131:16,22 132:5,12,14,17 136:12,13,15 137:1,4,19 138:4 142:6,15 143:13,18 150:10,15,18 151:7,15 152:12,15 154:2 155:20 156:1 162:14 163:10,14,18,20 164:2,19 174:6,17 175:2,5,8,20,22 176:3,8 182:5 186:19Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 23

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 187:16,20 188:10,14,18 189:1,9,20 190:6 191:22 195:9 196:1 199:14,17 201:4,10 202:17 209:13,17 210:15,20 211:2,4,8,11 221:10 225:17 235:22 241:12 242:8 247:22 248:3,22 251:7 253:18 261:5,11,20 hope 47:9 70:14 164:14 173:10 212:13 hopefully 29:21 192:2 226:16 hoping 27:14 226:14 238:18 horsepower 168:15 169:20 216:6,9 217:1,2,7,8,13,1 6 218:4,8,9,20,21 219:2,21 220:3,7 221:16,20 224:7,11,12,13,2 0 225:2,3 horser220:4 horses 74:4 hospitality117:3 hot182:19 184:8,15 212:16,18 213:3 hotel123:9 232:17 hour110:22 126:19 130:18 hours 30:10,22 31:1 32:3 38:1 82:14 162:9 164:22 250:16 251:1,3,9,15 house 50:8 How's 181:21 HRI 191:15 HRV160:2 HTP 2:7 7:9 15:2 17:18 162:11 164:8 huh 126:18 humidification 96:2,3,6,16 humidity31:17 38:20 43:16 49:19 51:12 58:14 63:4,7,13 160:5,6 humidity's 54:19 Hunt2:16 6:17 45:1,2,22 46:8,10 138:9 145:14 152:14 159:20,21 160:8,19 168:1 238:17,18 239:6,10,14 242:1,6 243:9,14 hurry159:2 Hurst3:19 7:6 248:15 hurting 61:19 Hussmann 3:15 19:3,7 28:1 77:19 93:4 HVAC 116:18 212:12,14 226:19 228:19 235:9 236:4,16 238:2 244:5,10

245:3,22 246:6,8,12,14 252:13 253:8 255:11,15 258:7,16 259:21 hydronic 176:14,21,22 177:1,6,21 178:2,3,16,20 179:18 180:19 237:3 hypermodel 155:10 I I&O 196:16 197:17 198:10,21 201:17 202:21 206:8 209:8 I'd 50:6 140:8 159:20 174:15 183:12 190:8 194:1,7 206:15 218:11 230:16 250:13 251:20 idea 60:1 68:14 83:15,18 116:19 157:10,11 194:21 216:15 217:5 219:10 ideal45:11 61:8 ideas 132:22 identical11:3 13:11 14:7 18:19 62:19 108:16 109:21 137:15 138:22 139:4,9,12 140:2,3,12 144:4 148:13,14,18 154:15 155:14 159:16 161:8

165:16 167:1,12 168:18 176:20 178:3 184:16 185:19 213:4,19 214:13 259:17 IEOs 175:22 IER 175:21 ignoring 23:13 I'll 12:14 30:8 42:19 77:1 112:7 129:1 135:11 147:11 156:10 191:11 226:1 234:21 236:10 242:8 249:15 259:10 illuminate21:3 26:6 Illuminated87:4,5 illuminates 24:14 illumination 28:17 I'm5:13 6:14 9:18 11:13 14:21 15:2,20 16:12,13 17:13 23:11,15 25:9,10 26:21 27:4,9,14 28:18 31:14 32:22 36:20 37:21 40:8 41:5 42:5 45:10,15,17,18 48:19 49:8 50:22 59:18 61:12 62:7 63:18 65:18 66:2,7 70:4,5 71:20 73:9,11 74:4 75:10,16 76:1,5 80:6 86:9 93:16 99:5 100:17,19 109:16 111:10Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 24

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 113:6 114:11,13,16 121:22 123:13 127:11 128:1,19 131:3 142:3,4 146:15,22 147:2,11,12 150:3 154:4,22 155:8 156:12 158:1,2,3,20 160:9 163:4 164:13 171:4,16 172:21 177:16 178:8 179:15 181:22 184:5 186:19 190:2 193:15 195:16 196:14 197:14 198:4 199:6 201:12 202:22 204:9 206:17,21 207:6 210:4 216:4 220:19,21,22 221:5 222:14 229:10 230:2,7 231:17,19 233:21 234:21 236:13 243:1 244:13 249:17 250:7 251:14 262:9 imagine240:13 immediately 213:14 224:22 impact 102:12 141:6,8 150:5 217:1 impacted 141:12 implemented 192:9 211:22 implementing 208:17 implications 177:11 implicitly13:20 231:7 implied 47:2 196:13 implies 124:18 imply193:9 important

83:12 impose207:10 208:3 impression 93:9,10 116:22 161:12 improving155:22 inactive 95:18 inaudible 8:18 10:9 28:3,11 95:2,4 122:1 151:8 156:14 163:8 180:2 200:8 207:1 208:18 211:1 219:11 225:3 227:9 239:16 246:10 251:1 256:17 258:4,9 260:3 Inc 2:7,22 inch 139:15 142:19 149:19 inches 122:6 124:3,4 187:8 188:20 191:14 include 11:11 13:17 26:19 32:13 37:11 76:9 113:10,20 150:20 151:3 156:4 161:22 171:3 180:11

included 9:22 10:3 21:5,20 23:8 24:4,16 27:11 28:18 55:10 98:5 136:16 138:13,16 215:15 255:7 includes 30:8 106:21 171:1 including 38:7 48:16 114:12 115:10 161:2 176:15 214:4 215:8 inclusion 37:16 inclusive 92:2 incoming155:5 incomplete84:7 inconsistencies 26:13 inconsistent209:1 incorrect 144:15 increase178:22 179:2 184:11 247:10,11 249:3 increased32:19 156:16 increases 165:20 increasing246:22 indeed 180:5 Independence 1:13 indicate 21:2 26:5 87:17 89:3 indicating 95:17 97:3,11 124:5,12 154:13 159:15 161:6 165:14 166:10,20

168:17 176:19 185:6,17 186:7 213:3,17 214:11 indirect159:10 individual 19:18 51:9 69:11 individually92:20 93:13 94:17 indoor 99:7 115:3,9 161:1 167:5,7 169:11 176:15,17 184:9 185:5,12 186:4 190:14 212:21 214:18,20 215:7,8,10 234:13 indoor/outdoor 173:14,19 174:1 induction 223:11 industrial 133:3 250:4 251:5 Industries 3:12 8:3 18:2 industry73:19 116:18 117:4 122:5 148:21 231:4 232:17 industry's 23:17 200:22 246:17 infer 32:7 inferring 158:20 infiltration 89:13 informal5:1 9:15 information 4:9 87:6 110:1 147:7 163:12 196:9,19 197:13Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 25

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 inhibit 214:19 initial 28:1 30:13 144:11 193:17 initially 34:12 initiate 26:21 77:16,21 innovation 82:20 111:11innovationfriendly 157:20 input 9:2,8,9 11:11 14:10 169:12 inputs 169:19 inserted20:4 insertion 213:15 inside 74:9 75:2 98:21 102:11 165:10 182:17 insist187:21 install243:21 Installation 202:22 installed 41:7 48:21 73:14 103:16 104:11 117:1 187:5,6 203:7 204:13 221:19 installing 51:10 instead 47:10 60:14 81:4 83:13 98:8 119:18 126:9 174:10 190:4 209:22 212:20 220:22 262:7 Institute 2:10,15 3:20 8:9 institutional 232:16 instruction 195:19 207:18 209:9,12 instructions 52:6 58:7 75:12 195:20 197:18,20 206:9,14 insulation 56:13 74:16,17 integral22:22 25:3 integrate44:5 integrated155:3 156:18 167:11 223:9 intend 202:12 intended 25:2 59:8 85:18,22 174:13 248:17 intent36:3 47:15 59:1 97:21 128:17 131:7 142:4 intention 172:14 intentionally 256:12 interest 75:20 263:11 interesting158:16 160:10 interim4:2 187:18 197:15 198:2,3 210:12 interior228:22 229:6 internal42:14 91:11,13,14 182:7 International2:19

3:19 7:7 interpretation 31:6 45:21 56:15 interpretations 15:22 interpreting248:7 interrupt101:10 Intertek 3:16 8:14 70:17 114:7 181:9 254:9 introductions 6:3 intuitive 15:11 invest70:14 invitation 40:10 involve 156:15 involved 93:5,7 113:13 127:18 involvement

22:17 IO 195:1 isn't50:3 59:2 142:6 158:15 195:17 216:22 ISO-1725 70:11 isolation 214:3,11 issue 13:20 21:1 42:8 46:12 47:14 49:4 57:20 64:5,6,7,8 65:14 72:16 74:20 75:10 76:14 77:12 79:14 80:1 86:18 87:12 90:6,10 91:21 95:13,17 96:22 97:3,6,11 98:18 102:9 103:5 104:4,19 105:5,7 113:5 115:8 117:19 118:20

119:5 124:4,12 126:12 128:2 131:11,13 134:10,12 154:13 159:7,14 160:22 161:5 164:6 165:13,21 166:5,10,14,20 167:10 168:7,10,17 170:13 173:8 176:19 183:6,11,19 184:7,14 185:6,16,22 186:6,11 195:3 196:19 198:15 199:4 200:17 202:6 213:2,9,17 214:2,10,16 215:1,6 224:6 225:22 227:20 229:12 235:18 244:7 245:12,17 251:21 253:19 257:11 issues 4:12,19 19:18 73:21 75:11 82:20 116:4,5 196:18 197:19 200:10 225:5,14 239:17 255:19 issuing 87:17 89:2 it'd 260:19 item19:13 225:15 258:8 items 34:8 262:1 it'll26:21 64:17 99:20 188:3 192:3 it's 11:17 12:9Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 26

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 15:11 21:13 22:13 24:8,11,13,19,20 25:14,20 28:10,14 30:15,18 31:16,22 35:10 36:12 37:5 41:2 42:9,14,15 43:2 44:1,2 47:2,3,4 49:5 50:13,14,16 51:14 52:3,4,7 53:11 54:3 57:16,17 58:20 59:1,4,11 61:4,5,19,20 63:3 70:6 71:12,14,18 73:13,14 74:8,20 75:20 76:2,4 78:3,18 80:9 83:4,6,8,15,16,2 0 84:8,11 85:12,17 86:10,12 88:4,13,14 89:21 91:14 93:21 94:3,4,5 96:4,6,18 100:21 101:2,4 103:15 104:6,18 106:22 107:3,4,7,10 108:7,12 109:10,16,17,19 114:9,18 115:3 117:2,20 118:1,3 119:18 120:6,7,8 121:5,15,16 122:7,17,18 125:16,18 127:20 128:16 129:12,14,22 130:2,9,16,17 131:8 132:5,17 134:20 137:1,3,5,7,8,9 138:5,6,16 139:4,18 140:1,2,12,13,18 141:1,3,15,20 142:13,15,21 143:16 145:2,8,20 146:5 147:20 148:18 149:12,16 151:17 153:21 155:5 157:16 158:14 160:10 163:13,15 164:4,5,22 165:1 168:5,6,21 170:9,10,12 171:8,9,11 172:11 174:6 176:5 177:5 178:17 180:5,7,13 182:4,5,6,13 183:10,14,19 186:19 189:2,4 190:1 194:3,12,13 195:20 196:16,17,18 198:10,13 199:4 200:9,13 201:7 202:10 203:6,18 204:7 205:15,22 206:7 207:3,7,17,19 208:7,8 210:13 212:10 216:21 217:9 219:12 220:2,4,13,16 223:7,8,9,18,20 224:10,12,14 225:7 229:11,12,15 230:17 231:2 232:1,4,10 233:11,12

234:13,17 240:12 242:9 243:1,2,18 244:8,11,15 248:3 249:1,13 253:16 254:10 255:1,2 256:15,16 258:20 260:9,21 261:8,11,16 ITW3:10 8:12 I've 74:2,3 116:21 181:10 209:19 219:20 J Jakobs 3:17 7:21 193:7 207:7 Janel1:21 263:3,16 Jeff 2:12 3:13 6:20 8:18 12:17,19 13:4 15:8 16:9,13 17:7 19:20 23:10 26:3 28:8 29:13,16 33:19 34:4 35:2,7,18 36:15,19 42:18 53:13 55:12 58:4 73:18 81:9 84:5 86:21 89:6 98:7 100:5 104:20 106:13 Jeff's 16:2 Jeremiah 262:2 Jeremy110:3 Jill2:20 7:10 113:15 136:13,14,20 138:15 139:10 141:22 150:8

151:11 156:2 164:19 Jill's 139:5 148:13 189:22 job 123:8 205:8 jobsite 203:17 Joe 108:20,22 John 2:4,22 3:19,21 6:22 7:6,13 12:2 47:8 48:4,5 207:6 225:10 231:11 246:4,11 248:15,22 Johnson 3:11 7:19 111:12 119:12,13,16 124:20,22 125:14,18,20 170:8,9,16,20 171:4,11,16 172:1 Judd 2:19 82:10 83:1,18 July1:9 jump 20:10 jumping4:20 Jun 1:7 junction 49:11 June 182:13,21 Jury244:12 K Karen2:9 7:3 9:19 156:17 204:19 206:15 244:2 Karim2:10 7:2 29:19 78:22 94:20 115:16Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 27

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 116:21 118:10 121:7 128:3 140:11,17 183:4 199:11 230:17 231:4 232:3 Karim's 230:10 Kevin 3:10 8:12 key61:2 81:14 118:15 130:6,8,11 150:2 157:6 192:9 232:22 234:4 keyword 147:18 kick 192:14,18 kicked 77:2 kinds 70:9 kit181:20 182:2 kits 32:18 Kleiss 3:13 15:8 16:11,13 17:7 35:18,22 73:18 knob 40:4 42:5,9,21 81:13 Kojack 2:18 7:5 60:10 61:12,16 62:8 72:4 73:8,10 195:15 196:7 197:3,6 207:12 Kozi 111:14 L lab 31:8 46:3,5 49:16 52:14 57:3,14,19,20 59:4 62:11 64:3 65:6 67:16 68:2 70:7,14 73:2 106:9,19 156:18 196:10 198:9 laboratory 2:18 214:7 labs 65:5 67:20 69:16,20 121:20,21 196:8 lack 106:20 lamp 214:18 lamps 258:15,17 land 206:19 language 34:15 36:20 40:16 44:20 45:8,17 47:17 58:17 59:22 68:11,22 69:5 79:17 80:6,20 97:20 102:8 112:19 113:12 114:12,22 123:22 124:8 126:12 128:18,20 143:1 154:1 167:3 171:18 176:12 192:11 198:8 201:12 211:17 236:15 238:1,2 239:21 258:21 262:2,6 LAPOOH 265:3,14 large 32:3 55:20 57:18 127:1 134:14 166:9 178:10 187:1 230:5,13 232:1 235:10 244:4 larger15:6 60:9 171:1,3 220:14 228:22 229:6 231:16 232:13 233:21 257:22 last4:6,13 5:8 27:7 59:17 79:14,16,17 103:10 104:2 117:10 134:13,19 161:14 169:10 172:5 173:14,21 180:13 186:18,22 193:17 196:2 212:15 225:18 226:8 228:17 237:3 238:19 239:2 240:1 242:19 258:12 later46:21 48:1 85:12 115:17 116:6 135:22 164:4 183:19 latest21:22 192:17 Laura 2:6 3:7 4:3 7:11,15 40:21 45:9 78:15 93:4 law 188:3 lawyer17:14 36:2 85:2 112:4 lawyerly112:19 lawyers 17:17 69:5 84:20 112:1,3,5 133:5 208:20 lead 14:16 least23:5,8 31:1 34:20 58:21 102:20 122:19 124:17 130:1 139:9 172:6 190:9,18 191:7 196:12 197:13 209:6 213:15 216:1 leave 34:16 211:19 235:1

leaving 213:12 leeway21:12 legacy245:5 legal210:1 Lennox 3:19 7:6 248:15 249:16,18 261:18 less 33:1,2 41:8 60:6 73:21 130:18 136:17 138:5,8 175:17 193:12 216:19 218:7,11 224:3 227:6 234:18 241:22 let's 10:19 12:1 18:14 20:10,17 34:16 38:15 87:2 135:3,9 143:4 147:15 149:5 150:15 184:7 210:5,7,11 212:13 222:17 223:2 227:8 231:1 236:10 252:9 259:2 letting50:11 110:9 level16:7 79:21 80:11,16 82:19 109:13 139:3,17 195:14 211:7 216:7,21 levels 109:18 LG40:11,22 life 246:19 light189:21 214:18,19 lighted 23:16,19Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 28

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 24:2,15 lighting 21:3,18 24:10,13 26:6,8,19 27:2 214:17 lightings 25:1 lights 20:19 22:13 51:12 86:16,17,19 214:17 215:2 235:1 258:15 likely175:3 189:5 241:12 limit 257:22 limitation 17:10 limited224:9 234:3 limiting219:7 line 25:4 165:21 174:14 178:22 179:3 191:13 liner102:10,12 lines 14:8 79:22 234:10 lineup 92:16 liquid 165:12 166:18,19 258:4 list32:12 103:11 240:20 254:1 260:11 listed 203:1,2 listening 209:20 literature125:9 164:21 189:16 190:9 201:21 205:13 209:14,18 little 18:7 19:4 23:17 28:6 59:7,20 99:6 127:11,12 128:20 131:3 137:11 138:4,5,8 147:3 221:17 252:5,10 LLC 2:18 load 35:5 98:10,13 213:6 loaded 12:7 located33:12 165:9 182:16 184:9 locations 214:21 Lochinvar3:13 15:8 16:13 17:7 35:18 73:18 logged 12:10 logic 235:7 logical223:14 229:11 Lois 254:16 long 17:8 36:5 45:13 46:7 62:19 63:22 74:20 131:14 143:9 152:6 157:9 158:6 163:9 164:6,9 185:18 187:17 220:16 224:15 245:16 longer144:18 145:9 146:1 216:13 long-term

117:13 118:4,11 119:7 loop 70:18 loophole 15:1 52:9 loopholes 16:1,4 lose 145:5

loss 13:19 15:10 16:3,15,20 136:19 178:22 213:15 losses 97:13 215:17,21 216:1,15 217:6,9 218:5,7,10,11 lost109:16 134:13 144:8 239:1,8 lot4:8 21:12 26:13 31:7 43:12 46:3 48:14 51:7,9 75:5 123:11 129:16 131:13 134:7 140:3 157:10,14 162:21 191:1 225:7 233:20 234:14 244:19 247:2 loudly 252:5 louvered 141:4,6 142:18 low 98:22 104:7,14 121:19 190:8 244:11 255:21 256:5,6,16,17 lower 109:6,13,14,18 174:16 179:18 211:6 215:17,21 216:1 lowest119:3 186:16 low-voltage 108:8 109:9,17 lunch 126:15,19 242:11 254:19 lunchtime136:4 Lupin 163:10 M machine 77:5,6,7 machines 39:1 81:1 86:11 Mainly162:14 mains 186:2 maintain 17:8 64:8 95:16 98:20 139:17 maintained36:4 maintaining38:1 majority178:20 248:12 MALE 8:18 13:4 20:6,9,13 21:9 27:7 35:21 43:3 47:7 69:1 72:11 84:16 86:6,9 88:13 93:18 95:21 107:18,20 108:5,11,13 111:6,8 112:10,11 119:21 122:16 123:19 126:8,14,18 130:9 132:16 135:22 152:22 153:8,10,11,21 175:12 208:20 218:21 227:9 228:3 229:21 236:17 241:6,7,8 242:5 246:2 249:20 250:19 252:20 man 40:19 221:6 manage55:15 management49:2Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 29

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 51:8 57:18 65:12,14 70:21 71:11 73:4 mandating31:16 mandatory 80:20,21 Mandyck

3:21 12:2,6,14 manner 57:4,19 manual43:5 77:5 81:2,10 195:19 196:16 197:17 202:22 207:18 209:10,12 manually43:7,9 44:2 100:2 manufacture 51:15 64:20 66:3,17 77:14 79:20 85:10,22 205:9 manufactured9:1 11:1 13:8 18:17 48:15,16 110:16 146:17 manufacturer

9:1 11:1,19 13:9 18:18 58:13 66:12 71:12 72:2,9,14,22 75:16 82:16 94:16 110:16 144:16 145:10 164:9 172:7 189:4 194:16 195:7,21 196:4,20 197:2 206:13 216:16 222:7,17 224:16 226:8 232:22 233:1 247:18 248:16,18 250:22

manufacturers 4:7 14:18,22 15:4 16:6 19:16 32:7 79:9 92:22 93:5,8 117:8 140:5,9 146:10 155:19 156:14 188:8,11 189:15 193:19 194:8 199:9 200:18 203:5 207:20 211:11 239:22 240:21 manufacturer's 58:7 75:12 188:5 194:11 195:1 200:19 204:8,13 206:8 209:13,17 Manufacturers 8:11 38:18 manufactures 243:12 manufacturing 2:8,9,17 3:22 7:4,22 51:17 232:21 248:1 Marantan 3:18 margin 153:6 mark 3:3 7:20 129:2 132:2 143:3 153:13 158:5,19 159:21 190:16 256:1 260:5 market75:2 116:15 117:19 127:13 137:8 139:21 145:21 179:5 231:15 232:20,21 244:9 246:6 247:2 marketability 156:6 marketing 23:4 marks 253:21 255:22 Mark's 130:4 Marshall2:16 6:17 45:2,22 145:14 147:3 152:13 159:21 238:17 Marshall's 259:13 Mary 2:21 6:15 19:21 29:18 50:1 65:4 264:3,13 Mary's 70:5 Massoud 3:9 8:1 48:10 51:4 master153:17 match 86:11 matched 132:19 material4:10 102:11 137:17 138:7 141:5 matter24:8,13 59:2 172:12 224:15 max 76:8 maximum41:21 82:21 may 14:16 20:20 26:15 30:19 38:18 41:7 42:17 58:11 61:6,7 73:14 86:16 90:11 92:1,3,16 97:19 99:14 102:11 111:13 121:7 139:17 148:3 149:15 156:15 158:2

160:16 170:9 173:14 194:15 204:8,12 214:6 225:4 226:9,11 227:6 maybe4:16 5:1 24:8,11 30:18 35:8 39:12 50:9 58:15 69:1 75:9 76:14 81:15 94:21 101:7 117:9,10 118:11 125:7 128:18 129:21 133:14 138:2 140:13 146:9 147:3 148:4 159:21 160:5 170:9 174:12 179:16 180:4,7,11 181:3,10 183:6,9,18 195:13 196:11 209:20 223:11 249:22 259:10 McQuay3:11 7:19 mean 17:3 22:11 24:8,11 25:13 28:5,15 30:7 31:9 34:7 35:8,12 39:10,13 46:9 47:1 48:20 49:3 50:8,21 52:3,6 53:2,10,19 54:1,20 56:14,16 58:5,18,19 59:12,18 60:1 61:2 62:18,22 65:6 66:11 69:17 70:15 77:22 79:4,12 83:22 92:5 94:3Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 30

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 101:6,11 104:6 108:9 116:3 118:9 121:8 125:20 128:3,4,14,17 129:8 130:4 138:1,20 140:20 142:15 145:12 147:18 148:11 149:6,10 150:3 153:14 157:6 160:9 163:2 171:1,20 172:22 177:20 189:10 193:16 194:12,17 195:9 197:20 198:1,7,22 199:7,19 200:5 201:5 202:6 204:8,22 206:1 212:5 217:13 220:6 221:7 223:15 228:18 229:2 230:3,6 232:17 235:8 246:21 247:14 248:6 255:6 256:8 260:6,12,17 261:11 meaning 35:19 139:15 222:19 means 8:22 10:21 13:8 18:16 23:2 75:7 90:17 98:2 104:13 110:15 112:19 127:2 145:20 152:9 155:8 172:4 176:5 178:18 184:22 214:4 218:9 247:9 254:17 meant40:2 112:13 197:6 meantime78:8 192:5 measured 37:9 165:20,22 measurement 129:15 mechanical103:15 108:7 146:5 154:12 mechanically 104:10 mechanically-wise 106:10 107:2 mechanism 42:14 44:5 medication 156:15 meet82:19 85:6 92:17,19 94:4,5 201:22 222:7,12,18 245:1 meeting 1:5 4:3,4,6,13 103:10 105:20 134:13 161:7 172:6 184:1 188:11,17 189:7 190:18 226:7 239:22 240:3 meetings 139:7 262:8 meets 164:11 198:9 223:4 melt 29:8 33:12 mention 134:15 249:8 merchandise 21:3 26:7 merging 34:13

MERV 119:13,15,18,19, 22 120:13 122:10,11 191:15 193:13 198:18 201:1,2 203:7,9 210:14,15,16,20 211:6 mesh120:7 121:19,21 met 105:16 187:2 metal155:11 metaphor40:22 method 52:13 61:15 91:18 164:10 207:4 212:16 methodology 94:18 methods 82:9 159:1 metric 158:6 159:22 213:6 Meyers 2:9 7:3 9:19 10:8,13,16 16:9 128:12 131:2 133:22 134:4 156:17 194:9 197:22 198:3 200:3,17 202:8 203:12 204:4,7,22 205:4,7,16,21 244:2 246:22 mic6:4 246:3 Michael2:18 microphone 8:7 193:15 254:10 Mike 3:6,16 7:5,14 8:14 51:22 60:10 70:17 71:7 72:4 83:3 114:7 137:11 138:20 141:22 144:1 145:4 146:15 147:11 150:8 181:9 195:15 254:8 Mikes 59:3 Mike's 144:12 mild154:12 mind 45:10 78:14,15 81:12,18,19 200:14 245:8 mine148:14 154:2 minimal118:2 minimum162:8 216:7,20 217:9,11,13 218:4,9,15,20 219:16,17 221:18 minimums 216:10 Minnesota101:12 minor 9:7 175:15 minute76:13 194:1 196:15 251:20 minutes 231:1 251:22 mishear 56:10 missed101:8 123:13 209:21 missing103:7 134:19,20 mist 95:15 misting95:14,17Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 31

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 96:1,3,11,16 Mitsubishi 2:22 6:22 246:4 253:4 mixed20:4 mixers 259:22 260:1 model 4:12 8:20,22 10:4,20,21 11:10 12:21 13:6,7 14:1 15:12 17:1,16 18:15,16 19:10,12,15 20:11 24:3 58:8 102:18 103:3 108:16 109:21 110:14 118:15 126:22 127:2 130:13,19 134:2,6,17 137:13 138:22 143:7,8,11 144:4,9,11,17,19 ,20 145:7,11 146:7,19 147:5,9 149:1 150:16,22 151:13,20 153:15 155:2,8 157:10,15 167:16 169:17 171:8 173:4 174:15 175:3 176:20,22 177:1 178:9 179:3 215:13 218:7 219:14 226:17 242:17 247:6 259:17 261:6 models 19:17 144:1 145:1 155:2 156:3,13 168:22 215:22 242:20 modifications 148:16,18 modify26:5 248:16 modulate212:21 modulated114:13 modulating 174:20 moisture159:11 166:16,17 184:12 money 16:3 145:19,22 148:3,4 152:3 241:11 month 211:21 morning 97:18 127:21 135:13 239:8,12 242:9,13 254:1 259:7,13,14 motel114:20 123:9 232:7 234:22 motor167:8,9 168:11,12,14 169:11,12,21 170:11,12 171:2,3,6,19 174:10,21 176:15 215:9,14,15,16,1 9,20 216:8,17,19 217:8 218:6,7,11 219:14,15 220:14,15,17,20, 21,22 221:18 222:10,11,13 223:2,3,4,8,18 224:3,16 237:1 262:2 motors 167:5 215:8,12 216:1,6,10,21 218:4 219:4,5,7,21 220:7 222:18,19 223:6,10,11,13 224:3,6,14 motor's 167:9 mount 178:12 243:13 mounted166:7 214:5,18 mounting234:13 move11:15 46:17,18 48:2 68:10 86:15 154:19 173:13 moving45:16,17 114:21 176:4 multi-parameter 158:22 mutually 261:11 Myers 3:12 8:3 18:1 33:21 34:22 35:2 41:18 56:6 57:9,22 209:7,15,19 210:8,18,22 211:3,6,10,19 myself 29:19 70:5 N National2:12 6:20 8:10 23:11 26:4 29:16 33:20 34:5 35:8 42:19 51:3 53:14 55:13 58:5 81:9 84:6 86:22 89:7 98:8 100:6 104:21 106:14 naturally145:22 nature 235:11

Navigant3:6,7,8 7:14,15,16,17 36:18 93:6,10 95:1 Navigant's 93:16 navigate 5:22 neat220:18 necessarily

128:16 141:14 198:4 necessary

28:10 102:14 106:3 negotiated239:22 245:18 Neil2:3 6:14 neither158:17 263:8 NEMA3:14 216:12 Neshan 3:9 8:1 48:10 49:1,7,10,13,17, 21 50:5 51:6 53:4,5 54:13 62:21 63:18 64:3,7,12,14,19 65:3 66:3,10,14,16,21 67:1,7,20 68:1,5,7 95:22 96:8,10,14 103:7,9,15 104:10 106:10 107:2,7,10,15 108:5,7,12,14,18 neutralize86:17 newer160:11 newly 245:4 news 239:14Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 32

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 Night89:10,11,12 nightmare249:2 nobody67:5 95:11 110:8 122:10 211:12 nodding 177:14 noise 33:1 171:12 nomenclature 133:2 194:13 nominal9:2,9 14:7 127:8 202:2 226:19 227:5,7 non 84:14 non-accepted 229:22 non-adjustable 84:12 non-coated142:10 non-ducted 168:19,22 169:3 173:5 none 28:6 103:13 254:2 nonissue 180:4,7 255:16 non-issue 28:14 nonpermanent 87:14 nonporous 115:12 161:4 nonstandard 90:6 124:11non-useradjustable 84:13 NOPR 23:7 nor263:9 normal 40:17 105:3 124:2

212:20 normalize217:6 normally 53:22 54:7 56:3 64:17 65:17 100:1 nos 46:15 no's 184:20 nose 76:2 notation 211:21 212:4 note 83:20 132:3 212:2 noted 9:21 10:2 180:17,18 notes 134:13 264:6 265:6 nothing 27:16 55:1 64:22 142:12 157:16 171:13 202:7,9 210:5,14,21 256:4 notice 25:20 77:15 78:4,17 164:6 notify87:6 nowadays 43:12 200:13 nuances 262:5 nuclear200:8 numerical221:14 O object 10:18 11:7 29:2 46:22 68:19 86:13 87:21 102:15 115:7 131:7 133:9 138:9 159:6 160:10 235:4

objected249:19 objecting145:15 150:9 249:16 objection 151:12,15 152:11 228:9 235:17 261:19 objections 4:22 11:22 18:13 19:1,21 20:1 33:5 36:12 38:14 44:16 45:4 87:2,10 88:20 89:9 90:8,9,22 91:10 95:19 96:21 97:5 98:17 99:3 102:7 110:13 111:2 115:1 118:18 123:22 124:7 126:11 127:10 133:21 134:10 136:11 138:10 154:18 159:19 160:21 165:7,18 166:4,13 167:3,22 168:8 173:12 176:12 183:3 184:3,19 185:21 186:10 213:8 214:15 215:5 227:16,18,21 235:15 236:2,7,9,21 237:2,4,9,17,20 239:20 240:4,9 241:13,17,20 243:6 251:18 253:15 255:3,19 257:15 objective74:7 80:1 104:6 212:4

objectives 122:22 objects 95:12 136:12,13 166:9 obscure 106:3 obstacles 122:2 obstruction 74:22 obviously 34:17 55:16 77:10 101:18 242:7 occasions 32:16 octave213:16 odd 23:17 47:19 101:21 oddball 101:11 OEMs 131:5 163:7 164:20 offer 32:7 73:17 107:13 144:13 offered 73:13 176:22 215:12 241:1 offering 54:10,12 171:3 offers 144:16 191:13 office 8:13 offset160:13 180:9 Oh 8:17 27:19 31:9 48:5 69:22 77:2 81:3 107:15 120:2 145:11 151:7 155:5 180:16 186:21 188:13 210:20 211:2 236:5 oil9:3 11:2 13:10Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 33

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 okay 5:2,3,11,14,17,2 1 6:4,10,12 8:15,20 9:11,13,15 10:10,18 11:13 12:1,16 13:1,5 17:9 18:12,13 19:9,20 20:2,3,15,18 21:10 25:9,10 26:1,2 27:3,5 28:22 29:2 33:6 37:8 38:10,13,14,16 40:1 42:1,5 44:21 45:5 47:12 49:15 50:6 51:3,22 57:22 64:9 66:10,14 67:2 68:21 76:12 77:19 78:8 81:18 82:2 86:9,12,14 87:2 88:10,17,20 89:10 90:2,21 91:6,10,11,21 92:13 94:13,19 95:13 96:19 97:6 98:6,16,17 102:3,6,9,22 103:15 108:20 109:20 110:9,11,12,13,1 4 111:16 112:6,20 113:4,6 118:18,19,20 119:14 123:21 124:1 126:3,12,21,22 130:10,17,22 131:9,15 132:13 136:3,7 144:8 147:4,8 148:9,15,19 149:7 150:3 154:8,9 155:17 160:19,22 161:13 166:5,14 167:20,21 170:1,7 171:17 172:2,3,19 173:11 182:9,20 183:17 184:2,3,20 186:21 187:11,17 188:13 193:21 194:2,16 210:8 211:10,18 212:9 214:2,15 215:6 216:3 220:18 221:8 222:9,16 223:11 224:21 225:20,22 226:3 227:13,15,17,20 228:9,11 230:14 231:2,3 235:16 236:6,8,10,18,22 237:2,4,8,10,18, 20 239:7,18 240:4,6 241:18,21 242:8 243:7,14 251:20 252:9,12 253:2,10,14,16,1 9 254:14 255:2,21 256:21 257:7,10,12,14 258:1,19,22 261:15,17 old 221:6 on/off 39:1,18 61:20 81:18 one-inch 122:15 one-off 136:16 one-offs 116:16 235:10 ones 9:18 10:14 13:16 20:7 43:5 83:5 113:22 135:10 137:5 207:22 228:2 242:11 250:2,3 one's 148:15 one-sided 41:1 online 108:20 249:6 open 30:19 50:12 52:7 54:4 74:8 78:7 83:8 116:19 185:2 186:3 193:4 214:4 223:18 opening 74:18 214:6 openings 55:15 operate56:12 61:5 62:15 109:12 174:4 operated56:2,8 57:8 73:14 130:3 operating54:22 84:17 98:22 186:5 204:10 operation 35:10 40:18 178:6 184:10 operational32:4 34:10 35:20,21 38:21 67:18 73:15 84:16 100:7,9 Operations 202:22 operator 43:13 operators 87:7 opinion 14:17 128:1 opportunity28:6

opposed 100:8 174:22 193:14 211:16 219:10 optimal 98:21 optimized 139:2,14 optimizing223:15 option 32:12 86:7 138:19 144:18 145:2,7,9 146:5 147:15 171:1 174:3,13 177:4,8,20 178:16,18 179:4 181:4 193:11,12 194:13 195:11 200:8 203:5 212:7 220:7 222:21 223:3 243:12 257:5 259:18,21 optional161:18 187:7 203:7 options 77:5 86:4 90:3 144:10,17 146:7 148:12 157:14 165:15 168:11 177:5,6,19 180:20 188:8 202:4 203:1,18 215:13 219:21 224:18 226:10 234:15 237:1 option's 18:6 223:17 Options 176:14 237:3 oranges 22:19 order5:20 25:16 28:9 32:12 58:9Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 34

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 93:21 94:9 98:20 103:21 156:22 157:1,2 167:9 174:1,4 184:11 196:10 204:15,16 205:12,19 235:11 247:12 259:16 261:7 ordered145:7 ordering54:10,11 organisms 214:20 original175:8 others 156:6 229:5 236:1 otherwise 102:4 104:17 148:13 154:15 159:16 161:8 165:15 166:22 167:12 184:16 185:18 213:4,19 214:12 223:8 ought122:10 125:7 190:9 249:14 ours 142:17 ourselves 245:22 outcome 142:5,6 outdoor115:3,10 154:11 159:9 161:2 166:8 167:5 182:18 212:20 234:13 outer163:13,15 outlet97:14 98:4,9,14 outlets 97:7,9,12 output224:9 outset6:8 outside 20:21 73:19 99:10,12 101:13 102:11 159:13 166:7 185:3,10 outstanding 57:20 77:11 overall59:1 246:18 overcome 178:22 overheat 102:4 overnight221:11 222:4 oversimplifying 58:11 oversized215:8 owned 34:10 oxidizers 90:13 P p.m262:11 Pacific2:16 6:17 package 10:21,22 78:16 134:15 200:11 230:19 232:8,14 packaged 111:21 112:21 127:2 page 134:17,18 228:3,7,10,13 236:10 237:6 240:7 251:21 257:15 paint163:17 pan 29:6,21 30:5,14,17,18,19 31:9 32:3,13,14,17,18 34:7,11

35:3,9,13 36:19 214:21 panel23:8 panels 22:21 pans 32:8,17,20 parallel13:15 200:13 228:14 239:15 parameter14:12 190:4 parameters 147:6 Pardon 111:10 parent8:13 93:11,22 parentheses 119:15 PARTICIPANTS 2:2 3:2 particles 96:17 particular5:4 46:12 82:18 156:12 178:21 219:7 249:13 252:7 particulates 87:15 parties 263:9 party196:8,9 passes 213:12,13 past33:8 121:6 146:6 pasting 174:1 254:19 path 200:13 220:13 pathogens 86:18 pay148:3,4 152:3 252:3 PDF196:5 197:21

peak 224:17 pegged 40:20 penalized 65:22 penalty60:14 207:15 people 15:1 40:2,5 45:18 54:11 63:6 71:10 77:20 96:1 106:16 131:9 139:6 190:13 216:12 221:12 223:16 224:2 225:11 238:15 251:22 252:8 254:13 per15:17 110:22 130:18 139:15 142:19 149:19 162:8 194:22 202:1 206:7,8 220:15 percent 33:1,2 49:19 59:9,19 63:4,7 83:13,14 117:21 118:3,13 120:16 136:17,19 137:2,6 139:21 148:6 212:6 215:17,21 216:1,14 217:6,9 218:5,7,10,11,12 220:10,11 234:19 247:8,10,12,20,2 1,22 248:4,13,17,19 percentage145:21 234:16 244:9 247:1 perfect76:15Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 35

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 perfectly82:6 perform70:1 123:11 215:14 performance 38:6 118:2,5 122:12 139:4,13,18 141:18 143:6 146:14 149:15,17 150:18 152:20 155:22 179:12 198:20 201:14,19 202:1 215:16 225:9 247:9 performed 154:14 159:15 161:6 165:14 166:21 performing127:6 153:19 perhaps 33:22 37:12 179:15 210:10 period 30:13 36:22 37:1,9,10,12 44:1 57:13 59:13 61:3 63:21 64:9 67:2 68:7 74:8 78:13 94:3 107:6 118:10 126:2 157:17 164:7 171:3 206:14 256:10 periods 89:14 permanently 21:18 permitted 215:17,21 personally206:17 perspective118:9 139:8 pertinent196:9

pervasive117:3 petroleums 161:20 PG&E 45:2,22 46:4 145:14 159:21 238:18 ph 5:9 18:9 33:1 40:11 76:7 83:21 111:14 163:10 201:6 216:21 241:11 phase 217:21,22 phases 234:11 PhD 3:18 phenol161:22 Phillip 2:7 7:9 15:2,15 17:18 162:11 164:8 phone 44:12 58:22 77:20 phrase 111:18 physical9:4 10:1 11:3 13:11,16 15:18 18:19 physically81:14 pick 139:22 143:9,21 210:15,16 252:7 picked 147:14 picking 137:9 PID 70:18 pieces 205:7 pin 191:2 piping 106:11 107:11 pit59:15 placement99:7 places 67:7 211:20

plan 41:22 164:13 193:5 plastic 75:1 120:7 121:19,21 play196:14 played 75:6 playing 16:7 79:21 80:11,15 82:20 188:21 195:14 216:21 please 23:9 45:1 246:3 plenty27:10 70:18 plenum 260:2 plot231:16 plug 37:17 221:17 plural9:7 plus 46:4 248:19 point14:18 22:7 30:14 40:18 41:22 53:9 61:8 68:14 70:5 77:13 78:15 79:19 85:10 112:1,8 120:4 130:4 138:21 145:4,16 160:1 168:2 170:8 172:6 178:8 179:5,15 181:7 187:4 194:6,18 196:2 197:10 208:3 210:6 245:20,21 249:16 pointed 180:18 points 71:19 73:15 75:18 183:16 209:7 216:8,10 pole 218:4

policy190:3 poor103:21 portable 231:9 232:9 portion 76:8 114:3 185:3,10 212:18 260:2 posed 210:10 position 5:6 11:18 21:22 24:6,18 25:17 27:18 28:2,3 39:14 42:6,12,13 43:22 44:3 52:8 57:13 58:20 88:15 92:6 93:15,16,17 95:9 100:20 116:12 117:15,22 126:1 136:9 148:22 150:4,7 185:1 186:3 187:3 193:22 195:6 204:13 206:13 226:13 229:9 235:8,12 240:19 244:17 245:6 246:18,19 248:7 253:21 254:2 255:8,9 positions 185:2 positively231:12 possibility 113:11 160:9 possible 197:9 possibly 250:14 postpone 238:13 potential5:9 potentially24:12 157:13 196:22Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 36

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 power38:19 73:22 97:9 98:5 103:17,18,22 156:16 160:18 165:20,22 167:7,8 177:11 221:17 powered 114:9 185:9,13,15,17,1 8 practical 56:10 practice251:14 preceded145:6 preconditions 159:9 pre-cooler

238:21 predefined 53:12 predominately 232:7,9 prefer17:19 118:1 preferable 35:22 prejudice207:5 premise 140:2 144:9 157:7 168:6 262:4 premium 220:16 prepared67:21 221:16 presence97:13 present29:20 38:22 47:22 82:17 89:14 90:6,14 109:10 166:11 200:10 presented161:14 presently91:2 preserve138:18 preserving138:18 pressure 103:11,17,20,21 104:12,13 105:2 107:20,21 108:7 109:7,11,14 119:18,22 120:5 121:8,13,16,19 122:4,6,11 129:13 138:6,7 156:16 160:14,15 168:14 176:16 178:12 182:8 184:11 187:8,9,22 190:5,11 191:14 195:4 198:17 199:12 200:5,21 201:1,2,15,18 202:14 206:19 207:15 208:4,15 210:21 212:18 215:10 pressures 106:4 207:1 pretty 9:18 17:1 75:21 83:2,12,21,22 92:9 93:16 121:16 164:19,20 228:2 234:17 prevailing 215:18 prevent 56:9 87:15 212:22 prevents 16:4 previous 139:7 previously23:3 55:16 134:17 pricing 261:6 primarily

114:8 124:11 primary 9:3 11:2 13:9 18:18 110:17 127:4 130:14 principle 221:1 prior13:16 30:13 162:6 probably28:2 117:20 146:10 174:19 176:5 183:9 193:3 197:6 206:21 217:16 234:18 243:2 249:18,20 262:6 problem64:19 70:22 76:20 93:20 106:15 127:20 136:14 148:11 158:2 188:19 189:1 208:17 223:20,22 problematic 104:4 250:2 problems 80:14 133:8 154:7 213:21 227:18 procedurally 47:7,9 procedure21:5 22:1,2 26:22 27:3 28:15,16 31:20 37:7 39:20 61:3,4 63:16 65:6 67:11,15,18 68:12,17 73:8 78:7 82:11 83:9,17 91:17 92:18,20,22 94:3,12,16 104:4 106:2 119:6,8 122:9 124:4,12 129:19 157:3,4

158:21 162:19,22 165:22 186:6 187:14 190:12 192:8 193:4 194:10,22 195:4,8,12 203:14 205:17 206:1,3,4,5 207:8,9,10,14,21 209:2 210:12 215:1 237:15 238:15 242:22 254:4,11 procedures 41:14 75:11 89:15,22 102:13 121:9 proceeding82:12 263:4,5,6,8,10,1 1 264:4,5,8 265:4,6,9 process 9:20 24:19,20 25:7,8,19,21 26:21,22 27:1 29:17 36:2 77:16,21 79:21 157:5 162:6 165:8 182:8 196:21 238:6 processes 22:10 83:16 161:22 produce 95:16 96:12 product11:15 21:4 24:14 25:2 28:17 38:2 56:4 62:14,16,17,19 65:16 66:20 74:12 75:17 101:1 104:7 109:22 110:15Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 37

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 111:19 112:14,22 113:1 115:18 116:7 117:11 118:6,11 120:6,15,16 122:15,19 127:3 128:4,21,22 130:1 132:15,16,17,20 133:1,4 141:21 168:21,22 174:14 177:5 178:15,21 179:3,10,11 180:5 181:8 183:8 191:13 203:2 205:1 206:22 209:10,11 229:13,20 230:4,7,11 231:10 232:2,10,13 233:5,22 234:2,5,7,10 240:11 243:10,12 245:4,13 246:1,19 247:17,18 248:13 249:13 250:8 251:2 production 122:19 247:10 products 51:4,5 58:2 62:1,2,12,13,16 75:14 79:9 82:22 95:16 116:6 121:18 129:16 133:4 141:10 162:21 205:6 227:5 228:22 230:8,22 231:8 234:14 246:5 250:10

product's 207:5 programmed 43:12 71:21 project 115:19 promise36:3 202:10 promote 158:13 prone 73:21 proper106:1 properties 139:11 141:5 proposal29:13,22 30:2,12 proposed 24:20 34:18 36:19 78:5,6,18 211:7 proposes 86:18 proposing 210:3 protect 122:8 166:8 protection 90:12 122:4 protective250:15 protects 253:4 prove 248:4 provide 55:22 69:10,11 73:10 87:5 90:12 103:18 145:10 161:18 169:19 170:5 196:5 225:12 provided 110:2 168:15 178:5 184:12 provides 91:17 119:1,3 168:13 186:14,16 196:4

providing 83:17 provisions 209:6 proxy13:4 178:11 PTAC 111:20 112:21 113:1,19 115:2 116:15 120:6 123:7 P-TAC 229:21 230:2,4,5 231:14,20 232:6 PTACs 110:14 111:9,13 116:11,22 117:5,21 119:11 121:13 P-TACs 229:22 230:3 PTHP114:6 public 164:21 published 192:3 pull 37:3 146:7 149:3 236:16 259:11 pull-down 37:2 38:4,7 pulled 89:12 pulling 37:13,22 164:12 pump 5:7 33:22 34:11 113:14,19 pumps 32:21 33:10,11 34:7 35:10,15,16 111:21 112:21 129:3 purchase 193:10 195:22 198:9 purely200:15 purifiers 96:22 97:1,3 purpose 98:4 216:6 218:3 219:4,5,8 220:20 222:13 223:3 231:10 232:6,11 246:8 purposes 20:22 34:17 35:17 37:20 60:2,7 64:17 69:14 97:20 124:12 push 23:4 43:3 84:1 104:1 pushing 43:14 putting 25:8 59:14 99:14 188:19 192:6 199:12 PVI3:12 8:3 18:1 33:21 41:18 56:6 PVU 253:12 Q qualify 15:12 183:15 219:14 259:16 qualifying 37:1,10 quality95:16 103:18,22 190:15 191:15 quarter218:22 219:1 question 28:1 31:15 32:2 36:15,18 43:10,11 48:11 53:4 55:3,5 57:1 62:9 63:12,14,15 68:13 72:20 73:19 75:9 88:2Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 38

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 92:8 93:4 97:18 98:1 106:14 121:8 134:1 137:8 143:4 148:20 159:20 163:7 164:17 172:20 177:3 182:12 189:12 202:20 203:12 206:1,12,16 210:9,10 222:6,17 223:1 226:18 236:13 242:18 253:21 255:22 256:1 questions 5:1 9:10 11:6 13:13 21:10 31:6 39:3 44:16 87:20 88:19 89:18 90:8,15 93:2 110:6,8 111:1 127:9 154:17 159:18 160:20 162:19 165:17 166:4,12 167:2,14 177:2 182:10 184:18 185:20 186:9 213:7,20 214:14 215:3 216:3 227:18,21 236:19 237:7,16,19 239:19 240:8 241:16,19 243:5,7,15 244:1 250:12 253:2 254:12 255:3,19 257:15 quick 187:15 215:4 236:13 242:13 quicker221:6 quickly 192:10,15,20 211:19 228:2,6 242:1 252:14 254:20 quiet178:8 quite 4:16 22:18 103:22 105:16 125:9 190:2 225:8 quo 187:18 R race74:4 rack 203:16 racks 119:1 186:14 raise 76:19 98:1 raised 80:14 ram213:22 range 82:21 87:8 118:4 124:3 191:20 213:16 233:17 234:10 ranges 234:9 ranging 191:14 rare99:10,12 230:12 rarely 136:18 rate14:10 22:14,20 66:20 68:3,5 79:9 149:2 rated14:20 17:2 26:16 113:3 176:21 177:1 201:16 202:13 214:7 rates 11:11 rather31:3 39:18 41:3 42:20 110:3 176:21 185:4,11 231:9 232:11 250:9 rating9:8,9 22:14 60:3 61:19 82:9 109:15 119:11 120:13 129:19 134:6 157:2,3 159:1 174:16 198:18 201:1,2 207:4 208:2 224:20 225:2,3 227:8 248:9,10 ratings 9:2,8 134:8 143:10 208:2,4 ratio 184:12 re185:11 react 42:10 56:22 57:5 59:5,7 230:21 reaction 190:7 250:21,22 reacts 42:13 44:6 reading 142:3 191:12 ready4:13 13:6 20:2 86:15 91:8 227:13 235:4 252:15 real59:8 236:13 242:1,12 reality31:22 106:3 139:20,21 realize36:1 72:18 73:13 94:22 95:4 187:18 192:4 245:15 realized84:4 238:18 real-life 50:10

really10:11 33:16 41:1 45:19 53:14 55:7,14 60:16 63:14 74:4 76:3 85:1,12 95:2 105:22 106:5 129:14 138:17 145:12 147:20 152:2 156:6 171:11,20 180:19 189:9 192:10 195:7 202:6 207:3 223:15 225:8 231:15 233:22 244:15 246:12 247:15 250:6 254:19 260:18 rear90:5 reason 47:19 101:19 117:6 178:8 203:4 210:9 246:10 260:17,18 reasonable 44:9 74:10 191:8 227:5 reasons 116:3,14 145:15 244:10 recall103:9 189:9 receive121:21 received259:8 receives 107:5 receiving107:1 recess 76:16 126:20 225:21 252:2 recirculate125:6 re-circulate 185:4 256:13Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 39

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 recirculated 97:2 recite13:3 reclaim165:8 recognize17:16 recollection 103:13 recommend47:18 recommendation 78:16 178:6 195:7 recommending 198:5 reconcile148:21 record110:2 139:6 164:9 177:13,18 235:2,16 263:8 recorded34:20 263:5 recording30:11 38:9,11 252:6 recordings 264:6 265:7 records 164:16 recovery159:8 165:8 redesign 152:20 reduce69:9 89:13 115:12 125:3 139:16 154:11 161:4 reduced263:6 reduces 75:3 166:16 reducing 87:16 reduction 247:9 refer96:1,15 239:3 reference 131:18,19 referred36:21 referring36:22 37:2,16 96:11 219:10 refined 143:2 reflect 177:13 235:16 reflected143:1 reflective234:5 242:14 reflects 75:10 refrigerant

91:16 98:21 141:12 184:11 212:18 refrigerated 20:21 refrigeration 2:10,12,15 6:21 18:17 38:17 46:3 88:20,22 89:3 109:12 128:11,15 178:4,13 212:22 refrigerator

66:14 101:13 reg34:19 92:10 regardless 106:22 regionally155:1 regs 95:7 regulate69:19 regulated142:3 144:5,21 157:17 217:12,14 245:4,16 regulating23:18 144:14 regulations 36:6 78:21 93:1 112:13 183:7

217:15 260:10 regulator103:11 107:18,19,20,22 108:8 regulatory

245:14 reheat 184:8,15 258:8 relate26:10 related178:13 263:9 relationships 191:19 relative31:17 49:19 63:4 215:14,16 217:10 220:17 224:19 225:1,2 relatively 256:17 relevant 114:5 relief 184:21 reload 12:14 remain 30:10 121:18 remaining 251:21 255:18 remains 68:13 remember

131:17 173:17 180:16 239:12 remind 119:10 reminder200:9 remote69:8 91:16 92:2 remotely33:12 removal74:21 87:18,19 remove 74:10 89:7 97:1 106:19 124:19 183:19 255:17 257:6,8,10 removed 87:18 89:4 90:7 106:8,11 166:11 257:2 removing 129:22 repeat 16:9 245:10 replace111:20 replicate65:15 report 16:12,15 138:3 reported1:21 264:4 265:4 reporter 6:5 263:1,3,16 264:4 265:4 Reporter's 264:6 265:6 Reporting1:21 representative 41:6 76:4 92:21 181:11 represented 53:3 representing 178:12 request54:21 requests 262:3 require 17:1 21:17 39:21 92:16 95:8 122:10 143:22 174:19 187:14 207:9 required 28:17 56:9 65:10 157:13 174:4 179:4 221:20Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 40

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 224:7 243:1 requirement 133:14 178:17 223:5 requirements 105:20 192:12 220:3 requires 15:10,21 57:12 58:13 92:18 170:11 190:1 192:13 research 46:4 reservoir 35:13 residential132:21 141:15,16 190:19 206:22 244:20 resistance29:7 141:9 161:19 162:12 176:20 178:8 181:12 resolution 252:10 resolved4:12 resolving76:20 resonated14:15 resources 69:10 respect 29:14 responding 50:15 response 12:8 76:11 155:7 244:12,13 responsible 154:7 responsive 159:1 200:12 rest 77:19 148:12 235:20 236:3 256:9 restriction 107:10 resulted92:6 results 190:12 retain 151:20 retains 164:16 return 185:13,15,18 213:13 214:5 260:1,2 returning 185:3,11 reverse175:11 review36:2 133:6 238:4 revision 242:17 revisited213:5 reword 131:4 rewritten 131:3 Rheem2:9 3:17 7:3,21 9:20 156:17 193:8 rid 46:21 54:8 61:9 225:9 ridiculous 49:22 rise 131:12 168:14 Rivest3:6 7:14 61:21 62:12 63:15 64:2,10,13,15 65:1,13 66:8,12,15,19,22 67:5 69:13,18,21 70:3 71:7,17,20,22 72:6 137:11,21 138:2 141:22 142:8,12,21 146:15 150:8,11,13 216:12 217:5,15,20 218:2 219:6

220:1,9 221:14 222:8,10,14,22 223:6,22 224:10,19,22 225:10 road 14:18 Roan 230:14,16 232:21 233:4 234:7 249:6,8 Robert 2:14 Robert's 144:22 Rodney172:20 173:10 rolling 100:9 Ron 3:15 12:12 19:2,6,14 27:22 35:1 77:18 93:3 rooftop 243:21 room4:7 6:11 37:2,13 42:11 48:9 49:18 59:3 131:5 148:5 238:14 239:18 241:10 249:17 Rosenstock

3:20 8:8 rotation 175:11 rotational167:10 round 101:14,18 routes 191:14 rows 139:16 149:19 RTU231:14 232:11 RTUs 117:2 231:16 239:6 rudimentary 61:20 99:13 rule 24:20 34:18

78:6 95:4 97:20 131:13 187:14 192:13,15 193:4,5 207:21 rulemaking1:4 27:1 78:18 94:22 117:14 132:4 190:1 191:18 192:5 211:22 225:6 262:12 run 23:5 27:13 31:1 34:2 37:5 41:8 50:11,20 54:13,14 59:19 60:18 67:3,5,13 70:13 76:4 84:1,2 93:21 94:10 101:14 106:4 109:8 149:2 running 34:1 50:3,10 83:8 84:11 101:17,20 160:16 rural105:17 Russell2:8 Rusty2:8 5:5 7:8 91:1 114:1 117:18 119:9 121:8 122:13,21 123:14 124:16 129:20 162:18 175:14 191:11 235:2 248:11 257:1 S Sachs 3:4 6:16 11:9,13,20 13:14 14:4,11,12,15,21 15:14 16:5 17:12,22 18:11Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 41

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 31:14,21 32:6,22 33:3 40:6,8,21 42:7 44:18 45:9 47:6,8,13,17 48:3 68:19 69:6 70:4 82:7 83:6,11 84:3 89:20 91:22 92:11 99:5 111:3,15 113:9,18 114:5,11,19 116:21 121:22 122:21 123:4,13,16,18 127:11,12 133:10 136:20 137:3,7 138:12 140:7 154:19,22 155:17,21 156:12 157:18,22 158:19 163:12,15 174:12,18 175:4,7,10,13,19 176:2 178:7 179:6 184:5 189:22 190:7 191:16 200:7 206:15 220:12 221:5 225:4,11 228:14 231:4 232:3 233:15 234:20 235:2 238:10 239:21 240:10 241:2,9 252:17 254:15 255:1 257:17 258:2 safety214:8 sake 226:4 sale 119:2 186:15 215:13 sales 125:9

salt65:7 117:1 162:8 salty161:21 Sanders 108:20,22 109:3 110:5,9 satisfied 260:4 satisfy210:13 saves 247:2 saving 246:18 savings 63:8 scales 97:10 scheme 22:15 72:9,14 73:13 100:1 261:6,7 schemes 73:16 schucks 84:3 scope 234:3 screen 77:1 86:13 165:3 sea161:21 233:9 250:3 seafood 96:14 seal256:9 sealed 185:7 186:7 256:4 seals 56:13 search 114:16,18 seat76:18 second 29:5 81:21 84:6,9 209:8,19 246:11 secondary 91:11,13,15 seconds 76:18 section 111:14 113:13 127:15 128:9 130:6,7

178:11,13 sections 114:17 secure89:2 security 88:22 89:4 seeing233:20 seek 92:22 169:12 seem82:19,20,21 117:6 122:8 155:18 250:2 252:8 seemed 212:2 seems 13:20 75:20 83:17 84:6 144:7 175:4 207:3 220:18 221:1 231:13 232:3 260:19 seen 18:9 153:16 221:3 249:1 sees 109:7 segment232:19,20 seizure173:7 select 193:13 selectable 81:11,19 selected18:6 71:22 118:16 161:18 258:17 self-certification 165:1 sell76:1 142:5 148:5 153:4 178:21 send 70:14 79:13 108:10 sending 164:12 200:11

sends 70:15 sense 50:12 82:6 126:5 178:10 190:9 233:16 247:13 senses 45:11 sensitive 17:22 121:13 206:21 sensitivity122:4 240:11 sent191:12 242:12,13,14 262:2 sentence18:21 44:11 242:20 separate19:13,18 25:18 28:10 34:20 92:7 134:17,18 143:22 156:3,5 177:10,11 258:8 261:4 separately

34:16 51:11 133:20 149:2,3 150:14 247:5 261:14 separation 28:21 246:10 served127:13 153:12 service46:5 162:4 sets 57:13 setting60:18 77:6 96:10 144:2 190:12 settings 60:22 setup 75:13 seven 234:18Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 42

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 Seventy-five 160:7,8 several 30:8 74:3,13 145:15 severe250:15 251:5 severely 141:11 shaking 58:21 231:12 shallow 82:8 share 117:19 Shebik3:15 12:12 19:2,6,9,20 27:22 28:19,22 35:1,3 77:18 78:8 93:3,20 94:5,8,13,19 sheet155:11 256:2 sheeting75:1 shelf 247:9 shelters 233:6 she's 76:22 252:6 shines 214:18 ship 51:1 52:13 60:7,8 62:12,13 64:10 65:1,21 75:16 188:11,18 189:15 198:21 199:1,7,9 201:17 203:15,19 204:8 205:3,14 shipment 233:17,19 shipments 233:20 shipped 49:5 50:14 52:4,10 56:21 57:3,7,16,21 59:2 62:14 70:6 77:13 79:18,19 85:9,13,16,17 117:5,21 120:15,16,20 121:4,5,6 189:2,4 194:2,3 195:13,17,18 196:12,17 198:8,13 200:20 207:17 209:5 shipping 122:1 shop 188:3 shoppers 89:14 short68:19 74:8 114:18 194:9 short-circuited 64:18 68:18 shortly192:2 short-term117:15 118:12 119:5,15 SHR 206:20 shut76:9 shy83:19 sic 51:13 64:8 siders 28:11 sight145:5 sign 21:19 22:21 23:8,19 24:2,14 signage 20:20 27:2 28:5,7 significant 121:17 significantly 249:4 signs 20:19 similar26:9 83:3 106:17 137:8 146:8 166:7 190:14 238:8,21,22 260:12

similarity

17:10 231:20 similarly 173:17 simple24:12 39:18 43:14 260:20 simply80:15 146:19 150:14 simulate59:9 63:16 65:8,11 70:7,9,12,19 73:3 181:14 simulates 31:12 simulating31:22 65:13 104:6 simulator

65:5 single 32:14 48:13 57:13 134:6 137:4 158:7 159:22 232:14 244:11 single-metric 160:1 single-number 158:6 singular 17:2 sir65:3 sister243:11 sit75:22 sits 90:18 sitting 50:8 situation 127:16 144:22 164:15 170:21 203:19 210:5 216:16 situations 109:9 240:22 six 20:13 213:15 218:4 230:18 233:18 234:8,9 size 13:21,22 15:19 217:13 218:20 233:17 sizes 32:7,13 skin 76:2 skip 135:20 236:14 slash 96:3 sled 89:2,7 sleep 221:9 sleepy97:19 sleeve124:2 sleeves 124:3,6 slicers 97:10 slide 5:2,4 10:18,19 12:1,16 13:5 18:14 20:2,11 29:10 43:2 86:15 168:4,5 182:13 225:18 258:12 259:2 slides 4:9,16,20,21 5:12,16,18 19:18 120:8 135:12 slightly175:17 191:9 small 121:16 127:1 134:14 137:7 190:20 231:7 232:8 234:17 238:4 244:9 247:1 smaller 15:5 191:1 Smith 2:19 86:3,7 smoke214:3,11 snow 251:17Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 43

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 SoCal46:2 software 41:14 sold 75:14 176:17 178:10 179:7 215:11 238:10 solid 166:17 258:4 solution 117:9,14,15 119:5 137:14 187:15 197:15 201:3 225:12 232:7 245:18 somebody76:14 92:7 99:16 101:12 147:19 148:4,5 151:7 180:20 241:9 somehow 134:14 154:6 someone 48:15,18 51:21 64:21 66:4,6 67:2 142:5 someone's 204:15 255:5 someplace 49:14 66:18 somewhat 20:4 232:4 234:3 somewhere 71:4 117:20 118:3 sophisticated 51:10 sorry 10:13 12:15 16:13 19:6 28:18 86:9 100:14,17 123:13 177:16 181:22 202:20 217:13,21 220:22 sort84:7 96:7 127:20 174:12 178:11 190:13 249:22 250:5 sound 213:10,15,18 sounded 56:7 sounds 23:17 31:21 44:8 58:11 75:13 126:16 174:12 190:8 source5:7 9:3 11:2 13:10 18:18 110:17 127:4 130:14 135:1 165:12 259:6 Southern 3:9 8:1 48:10 space 32:15 122:14 231:21,22 232:4 244:21 space-constrained 231:7 speak 19:5 24:1,12 117:8 122:20 137:20 231:19 246:2 252:4 254:5 SPEAKER

8:18 13:4 20:6,7,9,13 21:9 27:7 35:21 41:12,15,17 42:22 43:3 47:7 69:1 72:11 84:16 86:6,9 88:8,12,13,14,17 93:18 95:21 96:4 107:18,20 108:5,11,13 111:6,8 112:4,8,10,11 119:21 122:16 123:19

126:8,14,18 130:9 132:16 135:22 144:19 152:22 153:8,10,11,21 175:12 180:22 208:20 218:21 227:9 228:3 229:21 236:17 240:2 241:6,7,8 242:5 246:2 249:20 250:19 252:14,20 speaking 28:8 55:19 93:8,19 205:11 225:10 232:12 spec 32:10 54:21 122:12 241:9 special30:19 40:18 54:21 58:7 90:3 146:2 155:11 232:6 251:5 256:16 specially54:10 specialty250:16 specific 128:22 155:1 201:13 202:14,19 222:15 231:8 specifically41:13 52:6 129:20,22 198:20 232:14 233:12,13 specification 51:15 105:15 specifications 198:10 251:8,9 specifics 189:11 specified 31:16,19 69:21 87:8 198:13

205:15,16,22 251:10 specifies 104:5 specify54:14 86:17 172:8 198:16,17 204:17 205:19 specifying 119:6 121:3 speed 167:10 174:22 175:2 spend 145:19,22 spending 241:11 spillover92:17 split242:6 spoke 93:4 169:10 spot17:22 52:1 spray162:8 163:17 sprayer96:7 sprayers 96:5 spray-painted 162:16 spreadsheet 221:17 SPVU225:16 226:2,7 231:5 249:10,16 SPVUs 4:8 135:20 227:2 229:19 230:6 square 142:20 squash 156:10 s's 127:7 stabilization 30:9,13,21,22 36:21,22Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 44

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 37:4,9,20,22 38:5 stabilized 30:10 stack 239:8 stage30:8 stages 30:8 stand 51:18 177:10 standard 32:17 54:10,12,13,21 55:4,10,17 94:4,6 119:6,10 121:1,2,21 124:18 125:20 126:2,7 129:16,19 147:9,13 148:6 164:22 168:16 169:12 170:13 171:19 172:8,22 176:17 179:18 187:7 188:5,6 189:5,17 190:4,19,20 191:7 192:18 193:9,14,18,20,2 2 194:2,11,14,15 195:21 196:6,18 198:14 199:7 200:19 202:1,3,13 203:9 204:17 205:12,20,22 206:11 208:11,13 215:10,18,22 216:2,5 217:7 219:22 220:1,2,17 221:18 222:10 223:2 224:18 247:15,16 251:14 standardized 31:5 124:5 standards 1:4 24:1 70:11 92:20 128:7 129:8 130:12 132:9 181:13,15 190:15 191:9 214:8 217:1,18 245:1 262:12 standby15:10 16:3,15,19 standpoint171:12 Stanonick

2:15 180:16 Stanonik 144:6,20 146:21 148:1,9 149:4,11,14 172:5 180:10 181:2 182:11,16 Star21:14 22:1,3,17,18 23:6 staring4:15 start 4:17 30:6,13,18 31:10 109:8 135:12 149:5 208:16 217:18 started31:2 34:12 145:12 157:8 starting11:15 45:12 155:1 225:5 242:3 starts 30:14 76:18 state14:9 30:10 37:6,11 38:1 50:4 84:18 97:19 105:10 129:12 175:16 189:12 194:12 223:11 stated138:13,15

139:6 164:22 168:6 194:11 statement129:14 130:15 145:6 175:16 199:15,17 statements 206:2 states 41:13 129:20 233:7 static40:3 176:16 181:13 182:8 187:8,9 190:11 206:19,22 215:7,10 220:7 224:8,17 stating139:5 246:17 status 187:18 stay17:19 18:2 158:6 232:8 234:22 stays 146:8 steady37:6,11 38:1 175:16 223:10 steam176:14 177:6,21 178:2,4,15,19 179:18 180:19 182:18 237:3 Stem3:16 8:14 52:3,16,19 59:6,12 70:17,21 71:14,18,21 72:17 73:1,6 114:7 181:9,17,19 182:1,6,9 254:7 step 8:6 158:22 Stephens 2:7 7:9 12:17,20 13:1 15:2 16:2,8 17:18 162:11 164:8 steps 78:1 stepwise 158:21 Steve3:20 8:8 Stevens 162:11 stimulated82:10 stinky225:9 stipulate 210:1 stipulated 40:12 stipulating 41:4 stipulation 17:8 STMB 162:19 stop 208:12 storage15:13 16:14 17:2,9 165:9 store3:9 8:1 48:10 54:16 69:12 storewide 69:9,11 story 226:15 straps 89:1 strike 128:2 strikes 220:12 strikingly127:20 strip 155:10 structure166:7 245:14 structures 213:11 struggled 24:9 stuck 57:2 studied 31:16 stuff 24:11 29:11 41:7 66:18 121:9Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 45

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 155:10 162:5 170:18 212:6 sub 86:8,10 subject25:20 45:20 78:11 180:6 222:19,20 244:21,22 245:1 248:10 submit79:10 subset246:12 sucking 30:15 suction 109:5,6,14 sudden 27:11 suddenly 23:3 27:12 suggest4:15 76:12 129:21 162:20 173:22 251:16 suggested58:16 209:21 suggesting 21:1 83:3 98:8 109:20 144:12 suggestion 42:2 56:8 71:9 76:7,20 120:14 131:4 187:12 237:8 Suggestions 59:21 suggests 83:7 87:16 89:2 Suite 1:15 summary168:4 summertime 54:19 super224:2 supermarket 28:3,10 48:14 51:19

supermarkets 41:9 51:6 supplied 167:8 184:10 187:7 203:17 supplies 64:21 supply 64:16 68:15 69:13 71:10 154:11 165:11 166:17 167:7 182:17 194:7 204:20,21 213:12 214:5 support156:8 supposed 203:16 207:5 sure 6:1,9 9:18 11:14 26:11,21 27:14 33:3 37:15 40:1,16 41:5 45:16,17 47:15 83:18 86:5 89:8 90:2 93:16 114:13 131:3 136:5 140:10 142:4 146:22 155:8 158:2,4 172:17,21 175:19 190:11 193:15 203:1,6 216:4 220:19 222:2 226:18 231:17 243:1 247:12 249:18 252:4,6 262:9 surface 13:18 75:5 115:10,11 142:19 161:2,3 surfaces 214:20 surprise 226:16 surprised 23:15

SUSAN 265:3,14 SW1:13 sweat74:16 switch 39:1,15,18 49:5 213:6 switched 39:2 switches 59:14 sympathetic 70:5 system49:2 51:8,10 57:18 60:15 65:12,14 67:9 70:21 88:21,22 89:3 96:1,2,3,11,16 99:1,13 100:10,16 101:17 104:21 109:10,12,17 121:17 128:11,15 154:10 160:17,18 166:19 176:4 177:10 178:2,5 204:2 242:7 systems 71:11 73:4 95:14,15,18 110:15,21 111:19 121:12 127:3,8 128:20 159:9 160:11 241:22 258:3 T table 79:14 181:13 183:14 216:5 tables 132:9 219:19 taking 37:19 187:3 talk 47:20 58:6 77:1 110:10

112:7 196:21 251:22 252:8 259:12 262:10 talking 6:4 34:13,14 40:14 59:18 85:15 111:22 116:3 119:17 128:21 137:12 140:21 144:9 145:8 146:22 147:1 162:12 170:12 171:4,21 193:15 195:16 202:21 206:10 229:6 230:2,20 232:19 252:22 259:9 talks 84:7 tank 15:5,6 tape 146:11 taxpayers 153:9 technical200:15 technically22:11 208:22 technologies 17:20 114:8 tele233:5 temperature31:19 37:2,13 38:3,20 43:16 87:4,6,7 temperatures 92:18 94:9 98:22 temporary212:8 ten 15:9 16:14,18 17:9 76:12 215:20 216:1,8,10 217:1,6,8 218:9,11 220:10 221:16Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 46

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 224:11,13 tend 191:5 tended 85:13 tentatively

172:7 term 68:19 111:3 146:1 194:9 200:7 226:21,22 terminal 111:21 112:21 terminology125:8 terms 15:1,19 57:4 146:13 155:19 206:18 216:13,15 254:4 259:7,9 test 21:5 22:1,2 25:17 26:22 27:2 28:15,16 30:6,7 31:17 34:11 35:11 37:7 38:21 39:19 40:20,22 41:5,14 42:10,11,13 43:17 48:19 49:17 50:8 52:5,10,12,13,14 53:10,11,16 56:9 57:14,19,20 60:5,13,19 61:3,15 62:11,16,18 63:9,16,19 64:3,17 65:5,6,16 67:11,15,18 68:2,12,17 69:14,16,19 70:7,11,14 71:1,2,8,9 72:19 73:8 75:11,22 76:3,8,10 77:12 78:6,13 80:10 82:14 83:8 84:1,2 86:20 87:9 89:15,21 90:18 91:17 92:18,20,22 93:21 94:2,10,11,16 95:18 97:4,12 98:6 99:1,19,20 100:7 102:13 104:4,9,21 105:1,3 106:2,4,8,19 107:12 113:16 119:5,8 120:14,20,21 121:3,9,20 122:9 124:4,12 125:21 126:2 129:19 138:19 142:10 143:9 145:3 146:20 147:22 148:7,22 150:14 151:21,22 152:4 155:11,15,21 156:18,20 157:4 158:7,9 160:1 162:8,13,19,22 164:9,10,16,21 165:22 167:11,17 169:2,3 173:6,7 176:6,10 178:1 179:11 185:7,17,19 186:6 187:6,10,14 188:5,14 190:12 192:8,17 193:3 194:22 195:3,8,12,14,17 ,22 196:8,9,10 198:1,8,9 199:13,15,17 201:5,22 202:1 203:13,14 205:16,22

206:3,4,5 207:8,9,10,13,16 ,17,19 208:8 209:1 210:11 213:5,19 214:7,13 215:1,2 222:19,20 237:14 242:22 246:14 252:21 254:4,10 256:22 257:8,20 259:18 260:17,22 tested9:22 10:4 23:21 62:1 68:9 77:22 79:20 92:8,19 93:11,12 110:1 118:1 124:5,13 125:22 136:10 137:4,5 144:21 151:14 157:14 162:21 164:10 168:18 169:12 171:19 173:3 176:21 177:1,8 178:9 182:4,5,6 184:15 187:22 188:1 194:10 200:18 204:6,15 206:16 213:4,18 214:12 216:19 235:13 240:20 242:21,22 244:18 247:4 255:13 256:6,7 260:15,16 testing22:10 26:17 30:18 33:13 37:20 38:6 48:11 49:16 56:1,5,22 60:7 67:21 68:11 70:2 78:6,11 87:18 89:4 90:7,14 106:7 108:17 115:6,14 116:11,13 117:17 118:3,16 136:16 140:4 154:14,16 155:16 157:11 159:15,17 161:6,9 162:8 165:14,16 166:2,11,21 167:1,13 168:19 170:13 178:4,19 184:17 185:6 186:8 194:14 196:6,22 202:6 203:8 207:14,21 208:6 223:7,14 244:22 245:7 246:22 248:3,4,8,10 255:7 256:10 257:6,8,11 260:9 testings 23:2 tests 27:12 39:22 70:9 72:1 91:18 119:7 156:4 text 34:19 92:10 thank 8:7 11:20 27:20,21 28:22 33:4 38:10,12 44:9 86:1 90:21 91:6 92:11 94:13 98:15 111:15 140:7 152:22 158:19 163:16 165:4,5 167:20 176:2 182:22 191:20 233:15 234:20 253:9,11 261:22 thanks 33:7 36:17 97:22 110:9 183:17 227:13Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 47

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 239:17 Tharp 2:8 5:5,13 7:8 41:10,13,16 91:1,6 114:1,3 117:18 120:6,11,13,18,2 1 121:2,5,10,12,15 122:13,17 123:12,14,17 125:7,11,16,19 129:18,21 162:18 163:3,6 165:2 173:13,18,22 174:8 175:14,21 176:1 187:1,12 191:11 194:21 203:3 204:12 212:11 217:19,22 218:3,18 219:2 227:1 234:21 241:4 242:16 243:11,18 244:8 246:11,15,17 247:7,17,21 248:2 249:3,15 250:22 255:8,11,14 256:5,11,15,20 257:3,8,13 259:20 260:4 that'll30:19 85:5 that's 10:16 13:1 19:15 22:5,7,8 23:20,22 24:6 25:3,19 27:16 28:19 32:4,10,15,22 34:21 37:9 40:1,5 45:15 46:16 47:16 48:7,13 49:4,7,21 50:15 53:6,8,19 54:20 56:16 57:3 58:2,15,19 61:2,12,17 62:1,5,14 63:8,10,14,18,22 64:6,7 66:1 67:4 68:21 69:2 71:3 72:15,16 73:1 75:3 76:3,5 77:16 79:5 80:3 81:13,16,19 83:2,4,11 84:12 85:14 86:1,22 90:18 92:5 93:14,16 94:20 95:4 97:22 98:11 104:3 105:18 108:9,19 111:21 112:13,16,19 113:5 114:19 118:11 121:19 122:6,18 123:1 125:21 127:19 128:13,14,16,17 129:11 130:16 131:14 132:1 133:5,11 134:22 135:15 136:3 137:21 138:2 139:5,18 140:2,5,20 142:3,4,22 143:13 144:5,11,14 145:2,7,9,10,11, 12 148:5,11,13,15,1 8 150:2,19 151:22 152:9 155:7,13 156:21 157:20,22 158:13 161:15 163:17 170:14 171:20

172:9,11,16 175:20 176:4 178:12 179:15 181:6,20 182:2 183:8 187:14 188:19 191:7 194:16 196:6,7,12,19 199:14,19,21 200:5,22 201:3,10,12 202:5,11 203:11 204:9 206:1 207:5,18 209:2,5,22 212:3,4,5,14 217:13 218:2,6,20 220:1 222:21 224:1,7 226:15 227:11 230:7 231:13 232:20 233:7 235:12 238:7,8 239:9 241:6,7,11 242:21 244:9 245:18 246:19 247:7 248:16 250:7 253:5 254:8 259:5 260:14,16 261:21 theirs 139:7 147:20 themselves 93:12 158:22 theoretically22:19 theory 139:12 197:12 thereafter

263:6 therefore195:3 218:6 therein 74:12 thereof 110:16 111:20 112:2 127:4 130:7,15 there's 9:8,18 15:13 18:5 28:5,14,18,20 31:5 33:16 41:10 47:4 48:17 50:19 51:9 54:6,22 61:14 62:19,20 64:5,15 68:11 74:9,19 75:1,5 77:5,6,7 78:16,18 81:15 83:22 96:10 104:14 105:11 113:12 114:4,12 117:4 118:9 127:6 128:1 129:8 135:10 138:5,6,7,8 142:12 144:18 147:5 155:14 157:10,11,14,16 168:4 171:13 175:16 181:13 193:1,9 196:9 198:13 199:8 204:2 206:12,13 210:5 212:14 216:5 224:5 226:16 234:14 245:4 254:5 255:12 256:18 260:17,18 262:1,5 thermal16:16,17 102:12 141:16 159:11 165:9 thermostat162:2 They'll 56:11 they're5:16 20:4 23:11,13 32:20 34:3,8 39:20Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 48

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 43:13 48:21 51:10 56:17,20 57:5,7,8 60:17,18 63:10 67:12 70:10 77:12 80:9,14 87:14 96:5 99:11 100:3 105:14 132:6,22 135:22 136:16,17,18 138:4 147:19 148:3,7 152:2 157:13 187:3 196:12 200:12 205:12 207:22 208:1,5 220:9 224:8 228:4 230:4,5,20 231:14 236:5 239:14 240:1 242:6 244:21,22 245:1 250:4 255:12 260:11 They've 46:3 thicker138:5,7 thin 115:12 161:4 third 85:8,14 86:7 196:8,9 thoughts 33:4 131:1 226:22 three-door

51:18 threw260:6 throw135:11 191:12 194:21 203:20 throws 55:4 tied 261:8 tighter56:13 till254:22 tilt188:21 Tim 75:8 249:21 Timothy 2:11 title 35:16 203:4 today6:6 75:2 78:20 128:4 141:20 158:12 187:19 226:14 230:20 260:8 261:22 today's 122:19 tolerance 247:20,21 248:1 Tom3:11 7:19 119:12 124:20 170:8 tomorrow46:10 135:13 184:1 192:15,19 238:13 239:10,12 242:9 262:7,10 ton 227:6 230:18 233:20 234:8,9 tonight259:12 262:10 tons 227:6 229:3 233:18 tool134:7 top 21:19 91:5 228:16 topic 74:5 93:7 topics 19:11 toss 153:1 total82:15 141:11 160:17 touch 142:13 toward 11:15 45:17 158:22 213:15 towards 173:15

track 144:8 trade163:11 traditionally 22:22 32:20 trailer232:10 233:11 trained 216:13 Trane 2:20 7:10 136:12,13 156:2 164:20 transcript

263:7 264:5,7 265:5,7 transcription 264:1,8 265:1,8 Transcriptionist 264:13 265:14 transcripts 181:1 transfer136:21 139:11 141:11,13,16 149:17 166:17 transferred 165:11 transfers 185:8,9 transformer 98:4,5 Translation 112:18 traps 213:10,18 Traulsen 2:21 6:15 8:13 50:1 65:4 109:1 treat 57:6 229:17 253:12 treated 117:7 140:6 174:19 228:22 229:2,3,19 230:22 244:3,14

249:14 253:8 treating19:17 116:20 230:9 235:6 treatment226:11 249:13 tree207:2 tremendous 23:4 trial121:20 tried 242:12 257:22 Trigger126:18 trouble 19:4 44:4 252:6 true2:17 3:22 109:9 139:10 144:1 174:15 175:20 212:6 231:13 232:19 263:7 264:7 265:8 try29:19 45:4 46:8,10 93:21 110:3 138:16 155:11 192:15 trying15:1 29:17 31:3 32:11 50:22 55:6 60:14 61:10 65:14,15 67:10 74:4 95:7 105:18 130:16 146:16,22 157:19 158:1 163:4 177:15,17 190:13 192:17,19 197:4,8 200:3 201:12,14 206:11 209:2 210:2 216:16 226:4 233:21Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 49

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 245:19 251:4 262:5 TS 175:12,13 tube 141:2 tubes 115:11 161:3 162:3 Tucker7:16 turn 25:18 40:4 43:20 49:16 50:3 51:11,12 52:15 56:20 59:12,13 63:6 70:22 71:3,5 72:19 turned 81:2 84:8 86:19 215:2 258:15,19 turning 50:10 turns 35:6 39:17 40:19,20 45:12,14 84:10 two-door51:17 two-offs 116:17 two-piston 175:11 two-speed 174:19 type 10:22 13:8 24:19 32:17 39:14,17 40:3 42:14 44:5 52:11,13 58:8,13 60:3 78:4 102:12 110:4,15 111:19 116:7 118:15 127:3 128:21 162:1 169:21 187:6 197:15 204:2 205:8 219:7 226:20 232:10,15 233:5,8 234:5 238:5 249:9 250:4,7 257:11 typed 264:5 265:5

types 29:8 54:5 90:14 115:5,13 116:10,12 117:16 183:15 226:10 229:4 245:15 250:10 typewriting 263:6 typical161:22 233:18,19 251:8 typically31:1 120:9 121:18 123:9 typing 239:12 U U.S 2:4,5,6 Uh-huh 96:13 Uh-uh 112:9 UL 7:5 60:10 72:4 195:15 UL555 214:8 UL555-S 214:9 ULE 188:10,16 189:6 190:18 192:16 ultimately158:21 ultraviolet86:17 214:19 Um205:4 unanimous 154:8 228:6,11 236:8,22 237:4,11,18,21 241:18,21 253:16 uncomfortable 190:3 understand 28:13 42:7 45:19 50:2,22 51:1 62:6 69:22 70:7 77:19,20 80:2 83:10 95:6,22 97:21 98:6 99:7 110:5 122:16 128:12 131:18 137:16 138:16 142:16,17 146:16 157:18 172:21 178:7 189:3 198:5,12 199:8 202:11 216:4 217:4 219:19 220:5 221:3,8 229:11 233:16 253:22 262:4 understanding 14:1 46:14 75:10 85:11 106:21 128:8 179:6 257:3 understating 16:13 understood 93:10 131:15 171:21 172:18 under-voltage 108:11,12,13,14 Underwriters 2:18 unducted 169:6,7,13 171:19 unfortunately 22:16 30:4 43:10 194:5 unified 55:17 uniform 193:20 uniformly229:17 unique 90:4 235:10

unit9:22 15:9,17 21:18 22:22 26:15 31:2 32:12 37:5 56:21 57:3,17 59:2 60:5 61:17 68:16 71:22 72:7,15 73:12 75:22 82:18 85:9,12 89:2 91:17 92:3,4 103:16 104:11 105:3,15 106:7,18,21 107:14 139:18 140:3,12,13 147:22 148:12,13,16 149:4 154:15 155:14 156:18 158:15,18 159:16 161:6,8 165:15,16 166:7 167:1,11,12,16 168:18,19 171:2,19 175:11 177:20 178:2,3,5 179:12 184:15,16 185:4,11,19 187:4 194:3,10,14 195:18 196:10 198:14,22 199:2,9 200:18,20 201:7,17 202:12 203:8 204:10,16 205:3,12,14,19 211:5 213:4,19 214:13 215:15 222:11 232:8 233:11,12,19 234:8 unitary187:1Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 50

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 192:2 230:5,13 231:8 232:1 United 233:6 units 18:16 20:22 23:21 30:19 32:14 56:16,17 77:12,22 79:18 99:11 105:16 124:5,13 144:4 154:14 166:21 172:22 185:17 191:1 203:20 213:3,18 214:11 224:12 230:19,20 234:16 239:4 243:21 unit's 30:20 49:5 123:10 198:20 204:15 unless 52:5 64:10 82:16 113:13 unnecessary 260:21 unresolved 4:19 unusual 105:14 upload 197:18 useful 122:12 user41:20 42:4 57:12,13 60:16 61:1,13 69:3 81:10,19 userable 57:12 user-adjustable 50:17 84:15 user's 60:21 user-selectable 77:6 84:8 user-set 41:3 usually 32:18 48:13 99:11 100:2 105:16 190:21 191:1,2 utility's 105:20 utilize 100:10 utilized 38:22 40:10 UV86:16,19 214:17 215:2 258:15,17 V vacation 112:10 valid 22:5,7 value 82:13 120:1 157:11 valve 109:4 110:7 vapor165:12 variable 38:21 39:5,13 40:9,11 41:22 223:7,12 variance248:1,3,5 variation 18:5 167:9 variations 45:20 varied 102:10 232:13 varies 57:15 105:17 variety 73:15,16 193:1 230:12 232:15,18 234:14 235:10 Various 234:11 vary104:5 167:8 varying42:15 vast248:12 ventilation 159:7,8 venting 185:2

verbiage41:10 verifiable 61:15 verification 196:22 244:22 verify23:9 162:15 VERS 159:16 version 109:22 163:9 164:3 193:9 218:9 239:13 versus 31:10 54:1 55:4,10 81:14 190:22 vertical 232:8,14 234:8 VFD 167:12,17 173:14,15,19 174:3,9,13,22 175:17 view145:16 215:12 232:7 245:21 viewing 74:22 vision 120:18 visual87:6 volt98:2,3 voltage103:18 104:5,14 105:17 106:22 107:5,19 voltages 104:7 234:11 volume 14:10,11,12,20 15:9,13 16:15,18,20 17:2,9,10 234:9 256:17 vote4:14 9:13,15,17 24:18 25:8 28:2 46:19 47:3 48:2,3,4 89:20 95:12 136:9 159:4,5 183:21 210:7 211:14 226:14 227:14 235:4 237:5,8 238:13 249:17 251:17 252:14,15 253:14,21 254:21 259:3 voted12:19 46:6 48:5 116:10 211:20 259:4 voting 4:18 10:17 47:4,19 89:19 117:16 222:3 VRF5:9 243:10 244:3 246:7,12 252:13 253:8 VRFs 245:4 253:1 258:13 VVD 167:6 W wait159:20 254:22 waiver92:22 93:1 94:3,12,16 157:5 173:7 walk5:17 74:11 walked 12:17 wall 90:5 124:2,3 warm8:21,22 10:8 74:18 98:20 99:11 warm-air

127:14 Washington 1:16 3:10 8:12Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 51

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 wasn't 40:1 59:17 69:6 139:10 180:14 188:16 193:16 226:18 259:22 waste 69:10 water5:7 13:7,8 16:12 18:5 29:8 30:15 31:4 33:12 95:15 96:17 135:1 161:21 182:19 187:8 239:4 259:6 water-cooled 134:14,18 135:2,5 wattage38:18 48:12 49:18 60:12 63:21 72:15 82:15 watts 220:15 221:15 ways 29:19 74:13,14 weather101:16 154:12 Webber 36:10,14,17 37:8,15,19 38:10 Weber3:8 7:17 webinar's 12:6 we'd 105:2 156:6 169:2 238:10 wedge 92:13,14,19,21 93:10,21 Wednesday1:9 4:7 week 4:14 161:14 226:8 240:1 weeks 33:8 173:9

weigh 156:8 weight208:4 weighting 238:6 welcome110:11 we'll 4:19 9:14 20:15 34:17,18 78:17 85:2 94:21 110:2,11 126:6 153:1 157:5 175:10 182:20 193:2 228:7 238:13,14 239:11 251:21 252:12 259:13 262:7,10 we're 4:20 10:8 12:8 19:4,14,15,17 20:8 22:9 24:22 25:6,7 29:10 37:1 44:12 47:4,15 57:2 58:3 61:1,10 65:14,15 67:10,12 72:6,8,12 73:16 75:13,14 77:14 78:20 79:7 82:15 85:15 86:14 93:18 95:7,8 100:6 103:6 111:21 114:11 115:16,20 121:5 123:6 126:17 127:16 131:15 134:9 140:21 142:13,22 145:8 146:22 152:3 154:21 155:1,13 157:12,19 158:12 170:17 171:21 172:1 177:18 185:22

187:18 190:11 191:17,20 192:1,19 193:8,10,21 194:2 195:16 197:4,8,18 198:16 205:11 206:10,11 207:8 208:11,12,13,15, 16 209:2,3,4 210:2 212:11 214:15 216:14,15 219:7 225:5,6 226:5,13 235:6 238:3 244:10 245:5 246:18,20 251:4 252:5,22 253:3,4,5,14 258:10 259:5,12 260:4,22 261:9 262:9 Wes 230:14 232:21 233:3,15 234:3 249:6 western 155:3,9 156:13 158:17 Westoff 76:7 wet31:18 40:13 41:2 53:6 we've 4:15 9:20 10:2 18:8 23:2 24:9 29:15,16,18,22 76:6 93:15 95:21 113:11 116:9,10 136:17 137:12 144:8 147:21 158:20 193:1,2 196:20,22 207:2 230:20 239:15 245:17 256:8 262:3

whatever14:10 30:15 35:5,14 53:17,21 56:1,2,4 63:8 85:14 95:1 100:1,9 117:12 120:15,21 125:20 139:16 149:7 169:22 181:4 194:2,14 203:10,17 208:4,13 209:9 219:8 whatnot146:14 whatsoever208:3 wheels 166:19 whenever34:2 73:2 109:14 146:6 whereas 134:7 where's 153:8 218:14 Whereupon 76:16 126:20 225:21 252:2 262:11 wherever209:11 whether14:10 24:19,20 25:3,20 34:18 44:1 52:12 54:6 57:7,16,17 64:3 72:21 84:8 122:6,7 132:22 137:9 139:1 156:8 164:17 183:7,10 208:18,22 223:4 Whitwell 2:14 6:19 9:6 97:22 111:17 112:15,17,20 113:4,6 119:22Capital Reporting Company

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 07-17-2013 Page 52

(866) 448 - DEPO www.CapitalReportingCompany.com © 2013 120:4 123:3,6 124:15,21 125:1,6 126:4 128:8,13 130:17,21 134:11,21 135:2,7,15,18 140:22 150:3,19,22 151:3 152:19 153:1,6 154:4 160:7,15 167:15,20 168:20 169:3,6,8,16,18 170:1,4,7 171:14,17 172:9,13,16 174:2 176:6,9 177:3,16 178:1,14 179:8,14,21 180:3,8 181:6 182:4,7 183:12,17 188:4,13,16,22 189:3,14 194:7,17 195:11 196:3 197:20 198:2,4,15 199:1,6,16 201:21 202:20 203:22 204:3,14,19 205:2,5,10,18 216:4 217:4,11,17 218:14,17,19 219:1,3,18 220:5 221:2,7,22 222:6,9,13,16 223:1,20 224:5,14,21 225:1,18 242:18 243:4,16 248:6 257:1,4 260:1 261:18 whoa 91:22 whoever204:16 whole 9:16 37:16 44:11 144:15 146:11 168:3 179:3 225:7 228:7 whom 263:4 whose 115:10 161:2 wicking 32:18 wide 50:11 234:14 wide-open 50:4 willing 25:6 80:6 152:3,5,7,16,17 157:9,12 194:7 wind 251:17 window 74:10 Winningham 3:5 8:4 227:3,11 230:10 232:12 234:2 238:3 winter101:14 wire 51:11 55:21 66:1 wired 49:1 56:3 69:1 wires 49:9,10,13,15 50:14 51:1 56:4 wiring 56:1 58:14 59:14 wise 104:11 wish 20:20 wondering 76:5 250:7 worded 131:8

wording 26:5,7 40:9 44:13 76:15 100:7 131:12 219:6 221:3,11 254:15,16,19 wordsmithing 257:17 work 23:7 25:22 27:17 33:15 42:16 45:4 58:18 68:16 71:17 76:21 93:22 94:3,15 95:2,9 99:18 103:20 104:13,14 211:21 225:4 260:7 worked 85:12 262:6 worker243:20 working 12:9 30:5 33:8 70:15 91:15 92:7 146:13 156:14 157:5 160:2 207:13 works 4:11 34:18 83:16 world 59:8 worried 17:14 199:6 worse 80:17 worst249:2 worth 190:2 worthwhile 122:5 Wow8:16 wrapping 200:11 write 108:9 131:19 180:17,21 198:7 201:12 225:19 228:5

writing 130:5 219:10 written 89:16 220:2 wrong 100:18 180:13 199:12 207:6 231:17 243:10 wrote 221:14 Y Yep 11:21 79:11 80:3,8 90:19 126:10 222:21 238:7 yeses 47:2 yesterday

200:8 yet44:19 45:16,18 47:15 131:4 181:1 192:19 you'll 102:4 179:11 YOUNG 264:3,13 you've 35:9 44:4 122:22 200:21 201:16,19 206:1 228:5 242:14 249:1