alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §450ss. Findings and purposes

Congress finds that—

(1) few events in the past quarter-century have rocked Americans' perception of themselves and their institutions, and brought together the people of our Nation with greater intensity than the April 19, 1995, bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in downtown Oklahoma City;

(2) the resulting deaths of 168 people, some of whom were children, immediately touched thousands of family members whose lives will forever bear scars of having those precious to them taken away so brutally;

(3) suffering with such families are countless survivors, including children, who struggle not only with the suffering around them, but their own physical and emotional injuries and with shaping a life beyond April 19;

(4) such losses and struggles are personal and, since they resulted from so public an attack, they are also shared with a community, a Nation, and the world;

(5) the story of the bombing does not stop with the attack itself or with the many losses it caused. The responses of Oklahoma's public servants and private citizens, and those from throughout the Nation, remain as a testament to the sense of unity, compassion, even heroism, that characterized the rescue and recovery following the bombing;

(6) during the days immediately following the Oklahoma City bombing, Americans and people from around the world of all races, political philosophies, religions and walks of life responded with unprecedented solidarity and selflessness; and

(7) given the national and international impact and reaction, the Federal character of the site of the bombing, and the significant percentage of the victims and survivors who were Federal employees, the Oklahoma City Memorial will be established, designed, managed and maintained to educate present and future generations, through a public/private partnership, to work together efficiently and respectfully in developing a National Memorial relating to all aspects of the April 19, 1995, bombing in Oklahoma City.

(Pub. L. 105–58, §2, Oct. 9, 1997, 111 Stat. 1261.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title of 2004 Amendment

Pub. L. 108–199, div. F, title V, §544(a), Jan. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 347, provided that: "This section [amending sections 450ss–1 to 450ss–3 and 450ss–5 of this title, repealing sections 450ss–4, 450ss–6, and 450ss–7 of this title, and enacting provisions set out as notes under sections 450ss–3 and 450ss–4 of this title] may be cited as the 'Oklahoma City National Memorial Act Amendments of 2003'."

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 105–58, §1, Oct. 9, 1997, 111 Stat. 1261, provided that: "This Act [enacting this section and sections 450ss–1 to 450ss–7 of this title] may be cited as the 'Oklahoma City National Memorial Act of 1997'."
§ 541.62 Referral for placement. ( a ) The Warden shall consider an inmate for controlled housing status when the inmate has been confirmed as testing HIV positive and when there is reliable evidence indicating that the inmate may engage in conduct posing a health risk to others. This evidence may come from the statements of the individual, repeated misconduct (including disciplinary actions), or other behavior suggesting that the inmate may engage in predatory or promiscuous sexual behavior, assaultive behavior where body fluids may be transmitted to another, or the sharing of needles.
( b ) The Warden shall submit a recommendation for referral of an inmate for placement in a controlled housing status to the Regional Director in the region where the inmate is located.
( c ) Based on the perceived health risk to others posed by the inmate's threatened or actual actions, the Warden may, with the telephonic approval of the Regional Director, temporarily (not to exceed 20 work days) place an inmate in a special housing status (e.g., administrative detention, or a secure health service unit room) pending the inmate's appearance before the Hearing Administrator. Reasons for this placement, and the approval of the Regional Director, shall be documented in the inmate central file. The inmate should be seen daily by case management and medical staff while in this temporary status, and a psychological or psychiatric assessment report should be prepared during this temporary placement period.
[54 FR 11323, Mar. 17, 1989, as amended at 56 FR 31530, July 10, 1991]
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Stone  Field  Management
Company,  on Form 10- QSB for the period ending September 30, 2001 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the
undersigned, B. Stephen Bailey, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
================================================================================

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Amexdrug Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jack Amin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of the
              operation of the Company.

/s/ Jack Amin
---------------------------
Jack Amin
Chief Executive Officer
March 31, 2008



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Amexdrug Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jack Amin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of the
          operation of the Company.


/s/ Jack Amin
-----------------------
Jack Amin
Chief Financial Officer
April 13, 2005
### §482h–2. Cutting of timber; reservation of patent rights

On and after June 11, 1946, all patents issued under the United States mining laws affecting lands within the above-described area shall convey title to the mineral deposits within the claim, together with the right to cut and remove so much of the mature timber therefrom as may be needed in extracting and removing and beneficiation of the mineral deposits, if the timber is cut under sound principles of forest management as defined by the national-forest rules and regulations, but each patent shall reserve to the United States all title in or to the surface of the lands and products thereof, and no use of the surface of the claim or the resources therefrom not reasonably required for carrying on mining or prospecting shall be allowed except under the rules and regulations of the Department of Agriculture.

(June 11, 1946, ch. 377, §2, 60 Stat. 255.)
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

TOWER IMAGING, LLC a/a/o ANTHONY MACALUSO , Appellant,

v.

USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY , Appellee.

No. 4D 2 1

- 1110

[ July 14, 2021 ]

Appeal of nonfinal order from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Ellen Feld

, Judge; L.T. Case No

. COWE

20

- 003812

.
John C. Daly, Jr.

, and Matthew C. Barber of Daly & Barber, P.A. formerly known as PIP Portal Law Group, P.A.

, Plantation, for appellant.

Jeffrey R. Geldens of Roig Lawyers, Miami

, and Abbi Freifeld Carr and Veresa Jones Adams of Roig Lawyers, Deerfield Beach, for appellee

.

P ER C URIAM

.

The trial court sua sponte entered an order transferring venue without any showing that plaintiff’s chosen venue was improper or that transfer was appropriate on forum non conveniens grounds. We issued an order directing the parties to show cause why these cases are not controlled by Advanced Diagnostic Group v. Ocean Harbor Cas. Ins. Co. , Case No. 4D21

- 458, 2021 WL 1310851 (Fla. 4th DCA Apr. 8, 2021), where this Court recently reversed a group of similar orders. Having considered the

respo nse and reply, we conclude that these cases are controlled by our recent decision in Advanced Diagnostics and Jones v. Sayer

, 313 So. 3d 126 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021) (holding that a court may not sua sponte transfer an action for improper venue).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded

.

C ONNER , C.J.

, K LINGENSMITH and A RTAU , JJ., concur.2 * * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Linda Kornblum, Respondent, v Michael Kornblum, Defendant. Andrew Brilliant, Nonparty Appellant.

[828 NYS2d 404]

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the nonparty, Andrew Brilliant, appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), dated May 9, 2005, which, inter alia, in effect, granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was to vacate an order of attachment in a related action entitled *Brilliant v Kornblum,*pending in Supreme Court, Westchester County, under index *749No. 16766/02, and directed that the remaining balance of an escrow account held by the firm of Berman Bavero Frucco & Gouz, PC, in the approximate amount of $125,134 be released to her without liability.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

By order entered January 30, 2004 the Supreme Court directed the release of certain escrow funds from the sale of the marital residence to the plaintiff to cover money judgments obtained by her against the defendant relating to substantial arrears in child support and maintenance incurred by him. Subsequently, the nonparty Andrew Brilliant, obtained an order of attachment dated June 21, 2004, against the plaintiff s property relating to claims by him against her in a related case entitled *Brilliant v Kornblum,*pending in Supreme Court, Westchester County. Consequently, the plaintiff moved, inter alia, for the release of the escrow funds to her without liability. The Supreme Court granted the plaintiffs motion, upon, inter alia, the admission by Brilliant’s counsel that the requisite undertaking in the sum of $10,000 was never filed with the court, and directed the release of the escrow funds without liability. Brilliant now contends that the Supreme Court erred in entertaining the plaintiffs motion. We disagree.

“Attachment is a provisional remedy designed to secure a debt by preliminary levy upon the property of the debtor to conserve it for eventual execution” *(Michaels Elec. Supply Corp. v Trott Elec.,*231 AD2d 695 [1996]). Because attachment is a harsh remedy, courts have strictly construed the statute in favor of those against whom it may be employed *(see Michaels Elec. Supply, supra; P. T. Wanderer Assoc. v Talcott Communications Corp.,*111 AD2d 55 [1985]). The failure to timely comply with the undertaking filing requirement in an order of attachment is a jurisdictional defect rendering the attachment, and any judgment entered thereon, void *(see McCann Schnitzler,*254 NY 107 [1930]; *Tiffany v Lord,*65 NY 310 [1875]; *Van Loon v Lyons,*61 NY 22 [1874]). Since Brilliant failed to file the requisite undertaking, and in view of the defendant’s substantial arrears and money judgments against him, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion by, in effect, granting that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was to vacate the order of attachment and directing the release of the escrow funds to the plaintiff without liability *(see*CPLR 5205). Miller, J.P., Goldstein, Skelos and Fisher, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                            HENRY L. CREEL CO., INC.
                           Certified Public Accountant
                                 (216) 491-0800
                               FAX (216) 491-0803

March 28, 2002


To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of Henry L. Creel Co., Inc., Certified Public Accountant, consents to
the inclusion of its report dated July 28, 2001 and revised March 26, 2002 on
the Financial Statements of AuGRID of Nevada, Inc. (the "Company") included in
Amendment No. 2 to the Company's report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter
ended June 30, 2001.

Respectfully,

/s/ Henry L. Creel

Henry L. Creel, CPA










                    3587 LEE ROAD SHAKER HEIGHTS, OHIO 44120
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of PremierWest Bancorp (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending
September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James M. Ford, the President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period
certified.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any of the Companys filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise be deemed to be filed as part of the Report or under such
Acts.



|                       |  |  |  |  |  |                                    
|---------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------------------
|Date: November 9, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ James M. Ford                  
|                       |  |  |  |  |  | James M. Ford                      
|                       |  |  |  |  |  | President & Chief Executive Officer
Case 16-10471-BFK Doc 24-2 Filed 05/09/16 Entered 05/11/16 10:11:12 Desc 

 Exhibit B Page 1 of 10
Case 16-10471-BFK Doc 24-2 Filed 05/09/16 Entered 05/11/16 10:11:12 Desc 

 Exhibit B Page 2 of 10
Case 16-10471-BFK Doc 24-2 Filed 05/09/16 Entered 05/11/16 10:11:12 Desc 

 Exhibit B Page 3 of 10
Case 16-10471-BFK Doc 24-2 Filed 05/09/16 Entered 05/11/16 10:11:12 Desc 

 Exhibit B Page 4 of 10
Case 16-10471-BFK Doc 24-2 Filed 05/09/16 Entered 05/11/16 10:11:12 Desc 

 Exhibit B Page 5 of 10
Case 16-10471-BFK Doc 24-2 Filed 05/09/16 Entered 05/11/16 10:11:12 Desc 

 Exhibit B Page 6 of 10
Case 16-10471-BFK Doc 24-2 Filed 05/09/16 Entered 05/11/16 10:11:12 Desc 

 Exhibit B Page 7 of 10
Case 16-10471-BFK Doc 24-2 Filed 05/09/16 Entered 05/11/16 10:11:12 Desc 

 Exhibit B Page 8 of 10
Case 16-10471-BFK Doc 24-2 Filed 05/09/16 Entered 05/11/16 10:11:12 Desc 

 Exhibit B Page 9 of 10
Case 16-10471-BFK Doc 24-2 Filed 05/09/16 Entered 05/11/16 10:11:12 Desc 

 Exhibit B Page 10 of 10
### §6235. Deposit and expenditure of use fees

#### (a) Deposit and availability

Unless subject to section 580d of this title, use fees collected by the Secretary under this chapter shall be deposited in a special account in the Treasury and shall remain available to the Secretary for expenditure, without further appropriation until expended, for the purposes described in subsection (c).

#### (b) Transfer

Upon request of the Secretary, the Secretary of the Treasury shall transfer to the Secretary from the special account such amounts as the Secretary may request. The Secretary shall accept and use such amounts in accordance with subsection (c).

#### (c) Use

Use fees deposited pursuant to subsection (a) and transferred to the Secretary under subsection (b) shall be expended for monitoring of Forest Service special use authorizations, administration of the Forest Service's special program, interpretive programs, environmental analysis, environmental restoration, and similar purposes.

(Pub. L. 108–7, div. F, title V, §506, Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 297.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original "this Act", which was translated as reading "this title", meaning title V of div. F of Pub. L. 108–7, known as the National Forest Organizational Camp Fee Improvement Act of 2003, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
#### David Henry JOHNSTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. State of WEST VIRGINIA, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-6248.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 15, 2002.

Decided May 10, 2002.

David Henry Johnston, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

David Henry Johnston seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *Johnston v. West Virginia,*No. CA-01-283-5 (S.D.W.Va. Jan. 30, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court *129and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
ACTIONS TO REDUCE 

RISK OF COVID-19 WEARING A MASK SOCIAL DISTANCING 

(6 FT GOAL)

HAND HYGIENE CLEANING AND 

DISINFECTION

4x

lower

Comparison 

Group

3x

higher

9x

lower

2x

higher

4x

higher

5x

higher

8x

higher

13x

higher

cdc.gov/coronavirus

CS319360-A 08/10/2020

COVID-19 HOSPITALIZATION AND DEATH BY AGE

0-4 years 5-17 years 18-29 years 30-39 years 40-49 years 50-64 years 65-74 years 75-84 years 85+ years

HOSPITALIZATION1

Comparison 

Group

10x

higher

16x

lower

4x

higher

30x

higher

90x

higher

220x

higher

630x

higher

DEATH2

1 Data source: COVID-NET (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/covidview/index.html, accessed 08/06/20). Numbers are unadjusted rate ratios.

2 Data source: NCHS Provisional Death Counts (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/COVID19/index.htm, 

accessed 08/06/20). Numbers are unadjusted rate ratios.

FACTORS THAT INCREASE 

COMMUNITY SPREAD AND 

INDIVIDUAL RISK

CROWDED 

SITUATIONS

CLOSE / PHYSICAL 

CONTACT

ENCLOSED SPACE DURATION 

OF EXPOSURE

Rate ratios compared 

to 18-29 year olds

9x

lower
#### § 57.4 Expiration date.

This part shall remain in effect until expiration, pursuant to section 816(h) of the Act, of the Attorney General's authority under section 816 of the Act.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE THE

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940

Release No. 34995 / September 6, 2023

In the Matter of

Apollo Global Management, Inc.

9 West 57th Street

43rd Floor

New York, NY 10019

(813-00408)

ORDER UNDER SECTIONS 6(b) AND 6(e) OF THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 

1940 

Apollo Global Management, Inc. filed an application on May 16, 2022 and amendments to the 

application on November 2, 2022, April 13, 2023, July 19, 2023, and July 28, 2023, requesting 

an order under sections 6(b) and 6(e) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“Act”) granting 

an exemption from all provisions of the Act, except sections 9, 17, 30, and 36 through 53 of the 

Act, and the rules and regulations thereunder (the “Rules and Regulations”). With respect to 

sections 17(a), (d), (e), (f), (g), and (j) of the Act, sections 30(a), (b), (e), and (h) of the Act and 

the Rules and Regulations and rule 38a-1 under the Act, applicants request a limited exemption 

as set forth in the application.

On August 10, 2023, a notice of the filing of the application was issued (Investment Company 

Act Release No. 34984). The notice gave interested persons an opportunity to request a hearing 

and stated that an order disposing of the application would be issued unless a hearing was 

ordered. No request for a hearing has been filed, and the Commission has not ordered a hearing.

The matter has been considered and it is found, on the basis of the information set forth in the 

application, as amended, that granting the requested exemption is appropriate in the public 

interest and consistent with the protection of investors. 
2

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED, under sections 6(b) and 6(e) of the Act, that the exemption requested by

Apollo Global Management, Inc. (File No. 813-00408) is granted, effective immediately, subject 

to the conditions in the application, as amended.

For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, under delegated authority.

Sherry R. Haywood

Assistant Secretary