alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §47–3. Use of proceeds; administration of leases

(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the proceeds from any leases issued by the Secretary pursuant to section 47–2 of this title may be credited to the appropriation bearing the cost of administering (directly or by contract) the leases and of constructing, improving, and maintaining roads, utilities, buildings, and other facilities within the El Portal administrative site. In the administration of the leases, the Secretary may contract for the management of the leases and of the leased premises, subject to such terms and conditions, including the right of the Secretary to purchase and sell the unexpired terms of leases and subleases, as will protect the interests of the United States. The Secretary may also contract for the use by him of any improvements to leased property for purposes of the El Portal administrative site or for purposes of Yosemite National Park, and he may use the proceeds from any leases for the purpose of making payments under any such contract.

(b) The Secretary may at any time acquire the unexpired term of any lease or sublease issued or entered into pursuant to sections 47–2 to 47–6 of this title by purchase with funds available from the proceeds of leases, or with donated or appropriated funds, or by donation or exchange.

(Pub. L. 90–409, §2, as added Pub. L. 99–542, §1(4), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3037.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2 of Pub. L. 90–409, which was classified to section 47–2(b) of this title, was renumbered section 3 of Pub. L. 90–409 and is classified to section 47–4 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,593,314
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,698,012
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  5,892,089
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,600,029
<PP&E>                                       5,721,524
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,301,279
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,047,304
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,781,894
<BONDS>                                        549,475
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,197,750
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,353,185
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,047,304
<SALES>                                     20,768,362
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                       11,564,540
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,707,514
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              58,908
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,437,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                   403,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,034,400
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,034,400
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .85
        

</TABLE>
#### §§ 35.179-35.189 [Reserved]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. J.D.B., Jr., Juvenile, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 01-30353. D.C. No. CR-01-00065-GF/SEH.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 8, 2002.*

Decided May 13, 2002.

Before RYMER, McKEOWN, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Following a bench trial, appellant J.D.B. was adjudged a juvenile delinquent for committing a crime that would have constituted burglary if he were an adult, and he was sentenced to be imprisoned until his eighteenth birthday pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 5037(b)(1). On appeal, he urges the reversal of his conviction on the sole ground that it was not supported by sufficient evidence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The standard of review on a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence is well-established: taking “the evidence in the *593light most favorable to the prosecution,” the conviction must be upheld as long as “any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond . a reasonable doubt.” *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). When the district court sits as the trier of fact, its credibility determinations are reviewed for clear error, and “an appellate court must be especially reluctant to set aside a finding based on the trial judge’s evaluation of conflicting ... oral testimony.” *Beech Aircraft Corp. v. United States,*51 F.3d 834, 838 (9th Cir.1995) (per curiam) (citations omitted).

The record in this case contains ample evidence to permit a rational trier of fact to find J.D.B. guilty of juvenile delinquency beyond a reasonable doubt: (1) he was identified as a perpetrator of the burglary by eye-witness Winona Weinberger, who testified to having seen his face as he was leaving the scene of the burglary and to having recognized him at that time as the grandson of one of her neighbors; (2) the police officer who responded to the burglary testified that J.D.B. fled from her when she questioned him on the incident, and she later discovered the stolen property exactly where Ms. Weinberger testified that the burglars had hidden it, thus corroborating the accuracy of Ms. Weinberger’s testimony; and (3) another juvenile testified to having participated in the burglary with J.D.B.

The district court expressly found that testimony by a juvenile, who purported to offer an alibi for J.D.B. for a period at least half an hour *after*the burglary took place, to be unpersuasive. That finding was not clearly erroneous.

Finally, none of the purported inconsistencies in the testimony of the government’s witnesses affected the district court’s ability to find beyond a reasonable doubt that J.D.B. committed the offense.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
### §3322. Enhancement project proposals

After the approval of a comprehensive enhancement plan, the State of Washington, the State of Oregon, or a treaty tribe acting through the appropriate tribal coordinating body may submit project proposals to the Secretary in such manner and form as the Secretary shall prescribe. Such application shall include, but not be limited to—

(1) plans, specifications, and cost estimates of the proposed enhancement project, including estimates of both the capital construction costs of the project and the operation and maintenance costs after commencement of the project;

(2) the enhancement goals that are sought to be achieved by the proposed project, including, but not limited to—

(A) a description of the affected stock;

(B) an analysis of the expected impacts on the salmon and steelhead resource; and

(C) a projection of the expected impacts on each type of commercial, recreational and treaty Indian fishing;

(3) evidence that the State of Washington, the State of Oregon, or the treaty tribe, acting through its chosen agency or agencies, has obtained or is likely to obtain any necessary titles to, interests in, rights-of-way over, or licenses covering the use of the relevant land;

(4) an analysis of, and supporting data for, the economic and biological integrity and viability of the project;

(5) such other information as the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Commerce, determines is necessary to assure that the proposed project is consistent with the approved enhancement plan and the provisions of this chapter; and

(6) after approval of the Commission's report pursuant to section 3311 of this title, documentation that the appropriate State or treaty tribe submitting or undertaking the project proposal has adopted and begun all necessary implementation of the Commission's management program.

(Pub. L. 96–561, title I, §121, Dec. 22, 1980, 94 Stat. 3282.)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

######  Forest Service

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Siskiyou County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet April 18, 2011.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on April 18, 2011 and will begin at 4 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Klamath National Forest Supervisor's Office, Conference Room, 1312 Fairlane Road, Yreka, CA.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Kerry Greene, Committee Coordinator, USDA, Klamath National Forest, Supervisor's Office, 1312 Fairlane Road, Yreka, CA 96097. (530) 841-4484; e-mail                         *kggreene@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The agenda includes project updates and financial status, and presentation and review of new project proposals to be considered by the RAC. The meeting is open to the public. Opportunity for public comment will be provided and individuals will have the opportunity to address the Committee at that time.

Dated: March 17, 2011.

Patricia A. Grantham,

Forest Supervisor, Klamath National Forest.

[FR Doc. 2011-6934 Filed 3-23-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
### §454. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 642, 650

Section, acts Aug. 24, 1912, ch. 355, §8, 37 Stat. 487; June 6, 1939, ch. 185, 53 Stat. 810, authorized the superintendent, the acting superintendent, custodian, and principal clerks of the various national parks and other Government reservations to administer oaths to expense accounts.
### §459. Cape Hatteras National Seashore Recreational Area; conditional establishment; acquisition of lands

When title to all the lands, except those within the limits of established villages, within boundaries to be designated by the Secretary of the Interior within the area of approximately one hundred square miles on the islands of Chicamacomico, Ocracoke, Bodie, Roanoke, and Collington,1 and the waters and the lands beneath the waters adjacent thereto shall have been vested in the United States, said area shall be, and is, established, dedicated, and set apart as a national seashore recreational area for the benefit and enjoyment of the people and shall be known as the Cape Hatteras National Seashore Recreational Area: Provided, That the United States shall not purchase by appropriation of public moneys any lands within the aforesaid area, but such lands shall be secured by the United States only by public or private donation.

(Aug. 17, 1937, ch. 687, §1, 50 Stat. 669; June 29, 1940, ch. 459, §1, 54 Stat. 702.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Words "national seashore recreational area" substituted in text for "national seashore" pursuant to act June 29, 1940.

1 So in original. Probably should be "Colington,".
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

IN RE: CASE NO.: 16-14014-BFK

ALICE JEAN VASKO, Debtor. Chapter 13

 

NOTICE OF RESCHEDULED HEARING

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Confirmation Hearing for the Modified Plan

filed on 3/16/2017 was erroneously scheduled on the wrong Judge’s docket, therefore the

Confirmation hearing has been rescheduled from 5/11/2017 @ 9:30a.m. to 6/1/2017

@1:30 p.m. and will be held at Judge Kenney’s Courtroom, 200 South Washington Street,

3 floor, Courtroom III.

rd

SCOTT H. DONOVAN, P.C.

 /s/Scott H. Donovan 

SCOTT H. DONOVAN, ESQUIRE 

VSB #24592

Counsel for Debtor

9402 GRANT AVENUE

MANASSAS, VIRGINIA 20110

(703) 257-1159/ScottHDonovan@aol.com

PROOF OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing notice was electronically

delivered or mailed on this 5 day of April, 2017, to all interested parties. th

/s/Scott H. Donovan 

Scott H. Donovan, Esquire

Case 16-14014-BFK Doc 28 Filed 04/05/17 Entered 04/05/17 14:26:00 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 30, 2020

Order 

Clerk

July 30, 2020

160263(130)

160264(131)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC: 160263

v COA: 334320

Saginaw CC: 15-041274-FH

DANE RICHARD KRUKOWSKI,

Defendant-Appellee.

_____________________________________/

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC: 160264

v COA: 337120

Saginaw CC: 15-041275-FH

CODIE LYNN STEVENS,

Defendant-Appellee.

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the separate motions of defendants-appellees to extend 

the time for filing their supplemental briefs are GRANTED. The supplemental briefs will 

be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before September 3, 2020.
CCOutreach Interactive Broadcast Seminar 

Focus: Compliance Issues Facing Small Investment Advisers 

September 16, 2008 

12:30pm – 3:30pm Eastern 

SEC-Registered investment advisers, regardless of their assets under management or the number 

of staff they employ, are subject to the regulatory requirements of the Investment Advisers Act 

of 1940. During this CCOutreach seminar, SEC examiners will share techniques the staff uses 

to develop an inventory of risk during an examination of a small adviser and identify effective 

processes the staff has seen to mitigate and manage those risks. Using these techniques and 

processes, small adviser CCOs will be better equipped to evaluate the effectiveness of their 

firms’ compliance programs. 

Agenda 

12:30 – 1:00 How Can I Maintain an Evergreen Inventory of Risks? 

1:00 – 1:35 What are Some Straightforward Processes for Mitigating and Managing Certain 

Risks in My Firm’s Inventory? 

1:35 – 2:15 How Can I Evaluate the Effectiveness of My Firm’s Compliance Program? 

2:15 – 2:30 Break 

2:30 – 3:00 What Records Typically Document That an Annual Review of Firms’ 

Compliance Policies and Procedures Was Conducted? 

3:00 – 3:30 Questions
January 2020

INJURIES

ISSUE

Unintentional injuries are the leading cause of death among American Indians and Alaska Natives 

(AI/ANs) between the ages of 1 and 44 years and the third leading cause for all ages1.

BACKGROUND

The Indian Health Service (IHS) Injury Prevention Program is based on the same public health 

principles that have been used to effectively control infectious diseases: define the problem, identify 

risk and protective factors, implement interventions, evaluate and assure widespread adoption. 

Collaborative efforts in describing the factors amenable to change have led to implementation of 

successful community-specific solutions to the injury epidemic. The IHS Injury Prevention 

Program’s mission is to decrease the incidence of severe injuries and death to the lowest level 

possible and increase the ability of tribes to prevent injuries within their communities.

STATUS

American Indians and Alaska 

Natives experience injury 

mortality rates that are 2.4 times 

greater than other Americans.

• 42% of years potential life 

lost for AI/ANs <65 years 

old1

• Fourth leading cause of 

death for infants1

• Total costs = $4.5 billion 

per year2

• Unintentional injury deaths 

decreased 59% (1972-2010)1

Risk factors that contribute to the disproportionately higher injury rates among AI/ANs include a 

greater proportion of young adults as compared to other Americans, rural environments and lack of 

traffic safety legislation/enforcement, and a greater number of alcohol-related incidents.

OPTIONS/PLANS 

The IHS Injury Prevention Program promotes building the capacity of tribes and communities by 

increasing understanding about the injury problem, sharing effective solutions, and assisting 

communities in implementing programs. Community-based injury prevention coalitions directed by 

tribal members and supported by tribal governments are becoming more visible throughout the IHS 

service areas. The IHS fosters competitive grant programs to build tribal capacity, to enhance 

existing public health infrastructure, and to implement effective community-based strategies to 

prevent injuries. 

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

For referral to the appropriate spokesperson, contact the IHS Public Affairs Staff at 301-443-3593.

1 IHS. Indian Health Focus: Injuries 2017 Edition. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, IHS; 2018. 2

Honeycutt et. al. Incidence, deaths, and lifetime costs of injury among American Indians and Alaska Natives. Injury Epidemiology. 2019.
### §476. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–588, §13, Oct. 22, 1976, 90 Stat. 2958

Section, acts June 4, 1897, ch. 2, §1, 30 Stat. 35; June 9, 1900, ch. 804, 31 Stat. 661; Feb. 1, 1905, ch. 288, §1, 33 Stat. 628; June 30, 1906, ch. 3913, 34 Stat. 684; Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 457, §3, 43 Stat. 1132; May 27, 1952, ch. 337, 66 Stat. 95, authorized the Secretary of Agriculture to sell timber from national forests. See section 472a of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Validation of Timber Sales Contracts

Pub. L. 94–588, §15, Oct. 22, 1976, 90 Stat. 2960, provided that:

"(a) Timber sales made pursuant to the Act of June 4, 1897 (30 Stat. 35, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 476), prior to the date of enactment of this section [Oct. 22, 1976] shall not be invalid if the timber was sold in accord with Forest Service silvicultural practices and sales procedures in effect at the time of the sale, subject to the provisions of subsection (b) of this section.

"(b) The Secretary of Agriculture is directed, in developing five-year operating plans under the provisions of existing fifty-year timber sales contracts in Alaska, to revise such contracts to make them consistent with the guidelines and standards provided for in the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act of 1974, as amended [16 U.S.C. 1600 et seq.], and to reflect such revisions in the contract price of timber. Any such action shall not be inconsistent with valid contract rights approved by the final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction."
<PAGE>



                                                                     Exhibit 23

                              HENRY L. CREEL CO., INC.
                             Certified Public Accountant
                                 (216) 491-0800 Fax
                                   (216) 491-0803
                                    August 13, 2003

  To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of Henry L. Creel Co., Inc., Certified Public Accountant, consents to
the incorporation by reference of its report dated August 10, 2003 on the
Financial Statements of AuGRID Corporation (the "Company") included in the
Company's report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2002.



  Respectfully,
  /s/ Henry L. Creel





  HENRY L. CREEL, CPA 3587 LEE ROAD SHAKER HEIGHTS, OHIO 44120
###### Editorial Note on Part 1337

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1337 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and 68 FR 10360, Mar. 5, 2003.

#### §§ 1337.5-1337.6 [Reserved]
### §460rrr–4. Management plan

#### (a) In general

Not later than 4 years after October 12, 2006, the Secretary and the Commission, in coordination with appropriate agencies in the State of Colorado, political subdivisions of the State, and private landowners in the Natural Area, shall prepare management plans for the Natural Area as provided in subsection (b).

#### (b) Duties of Secretary and Commission

#### (1) Secretary

The Secretary shall prepare a management plan relating to the management of Federal land in the Natural Area.

#### (2) Commission

#### (A) In general

The Commission shall prepare a management plan relating to the management of the non-Federal land in the Natural Area.

#### (B) Approval or disapproval

#### (i) In general

The Commission shall submit to the Secretary the management plan prepared under subparagraph (A) for approval or disapproval.

#### (ii) Action following disapproval

If the Secretary disapproves the management plan submitted under clause (i), the Secretary shall—

(I) notify the Commission of the reasons for the disapproval; and

(II) allow the Commission to submit to the Secretary revisions to the management plan submitted under clause (i).

#### (3) Cooperation

The Secretary and the Commission shall cooperate to ensure that the management plans relating to the management of Federal land and non-Federal land are consistent.

#### (c) Requirements

The management plans shall—

(1) take into consideration Federal, State, and local plans in existence on October 12, 2006, to present a unified preservation, restoration, and conservation plan for the Natural Area;

(2) with respect to Federal land in the Natural Area—

(A) be developed in accordance with section 1712 of title 43;

(B) be consistent, to the maximum extent practicable, with the management plans adopted by the Director of the Bureau of Land Management for land adjacent to the Natural Area; and

(C) be considered to be an amendment to the San Luis Resource Management Plan of the Bureau of Land Management; and

(3) include—

(A) an inventory of the resources contained in the Natural Area (including a list of property in the Natural Area that should be preserved, restored, managed, developed, maintained, or acquired to further the purposes of the Natural Area); and

(B) a recommendation of policies for resource management, including the use of intergovernmental cooperative agreements, that—

(i) protect the resources of the Natural Area; and

(ii) provide for solitude, quiet use, and pristine natural values of the Natural Area.

#### (d) Publication

The Secretary shall publish notice of the management plans in the Federal Register.

(Pub. L. 109–337, §6, Oct. 12, 2006, 120 Stat. 1779.)