June 26, 2013 

IM Ref. No. 20134121534 

John Hancock Investors Trust and 

John Hancock Tax-Advantaged 

RESPONSE OF THE OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL Global Shareholder Yield Fund 

DIVISION OF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT File No. 811-04173 

Your letter dated June 21, 2013 requests our assurance that we would not recommend 

enforcement action to the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") under Section 

5(b) or Section 6(a) ofthe Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") against John Hancock 

Investors Trust or John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Global Shareholder Yield Fund (each, a 

"Fund," and collectively, the "Funds"), each of which filed and had declared effective by the 

Commission a shelf registration statement on Form N-2 ("Registration Statement"), if a Fund 

files a post-effective amendment to its Registration Statement pursuant to Rule 486(b) under the 

Securities Act, under the circumstances set forth in your letter. 

Background 

You state that each Fund is a closed-end management investment company registered 

under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "Investment Company Act"). Each Fund filed 

and had declared effective by the Commission its Registration Statement pursuant to which it 

may issue common shares on a delayed basis in accordance with Rule 415(a)(1)(x) under the 

Securities Act and the positions ofthe Commission staff. 1 Each fund has filed a post-effective 

amendment to its Registration Statement pursuant to Section 8( c) ofthe Securities Act 

("Post-Effective Amendment") to bring the Fund's financial statements up to date. John 

Hancock Advisers, LLC serves as the investment adviser to each Fund. John Hancock Asset 

Management serves as the subadviser to the John Hancock Investors Trust. Epoch Investment 

Partners, Inc. and Analytic Investors, LLC serve as subadvisers to the John Hancock 

Tax-Advantaged Global Shareholder Yield Fund. Each Fund's common shares are registered 

under Section 12(b) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are listed and traded on the New 

York Stock Exchange. Each Fund has a fiscal year ending on October 31. 

You state that each Fund's board oftrustees (the "Board"), including a majority of 

independent trustees, has concluded that the ability to raise capital through the public offering of 

additional securities on a delayed and continuous basis benefits each Fund and its shareholders. 

Each Board also has concluded that a continuously effective shelf registration statement is 

beneficial to the Fund, its shareholders and potential investors. You also state that the Funds 

might be unable to sell securities pursuant to their effective shelf registration statements for 

significant portions of each year, to the detriment ofthe Funds and their shareholders, due to the 

Post-Effective Amendment process currently required to bring the Funds' financial statements up 

to date. You state that the Board of each Fund believes that the Fund, its shareholders and 

potential investors would benefit ifthe Fund were allowed to utilize Rule 486(b) under the 

Securities Act to file Post-Effective Amendments to its shelf registration statements in order to 

bring its financial statements up to date, or to make other non-material changes. You further 

See Nuveen Virginia Premium Income Municipal Fund, SEC StaffNo-Action Letter (Oct. 6, 2006); Pilgrim 

America Prime Rate Trust, SEC Staff No-Action Letter (May I, 1998) ("Pilgrim Letter"). 
state that each Fund, its shareholders and potential investors would benefit if Post-Effective 

Amendments filed for the purpose of bringing the Fund's financial statements up to date or to 

make any other non-material changes were effective immediately, as permitted by Rule 486(b) 

under the Securities Act available to certain registered closed-end investment companies. You 

state that utilization ofRule 486(b) would help ensure that the Funds have the ability to raise 

capital as the opportunity arises, and could reduce expenses incurred by the Funds in the 

Post-Effective Amendment process. You further state that due to the limited purpose for which 

the Funds would use Rule 486(b), no erosion of investor protection would occur, and investors 

could have faster access to important information about the Funds, including their updated 

financial information. 

Discussion 

Rule 486(b) under the Securities Act, in relevant part, states that a post-effective 

amendment to a registration statement filed by a registered closed-end management investment 

company that makes periodic repurchase offers under Rule 23c-3 under the Investment Company 

Act ("Interval Fund") shall become effective on the date on which it is filed with the 

Commission, provided that certain conditions are met. The conditions ofRule 486(b) require, 

among other things, that the post-effectjve amendment be filed for no purpose other than, among 

other things, bringing the financial statements up to date under Section 10(a)(3) ofthe Securities 

Act or Rule 3-18 ofRegulation S-X or making non-material changes, and that the registrant 

make certain representations concerning the purpose for which the amendment is filed. 

In adopting Rule 486(b) in 1994, the Commission recognized that Interval Funds may 

have a need to raise capital continuously, and therefore need continuously effective registration 

statements and would benefit if certain filings could become effective automatically.2 The 

Commission staff in 1998 recognized that registered closed-end management investment 

companies such as the Funds, which are not Interval Funds, also may benefit from the flexibility 

to take advantage of favorable market conditions to raise additional capital through continuous or 

delayed offerings oftheir securities.3 You assert that the Funds and their shareholders also 

would benefit ifthe Funds' Post-Effective Amendments that comply with the conditions ofRule 

486(b) could become effective immediately pursuant to that Rule. 

You represent that each filing made in reliance on the requested relief would be made in 

compliance with the conditions of Rule 486(b), and that each Fund will file a Post-Effective 

Amendment containing a prospectus pursuant to Section 8( c) ofthe Securities Act prior to any 

offering of its securities at a price below net asset value. You also represent that in relying on the 

requested relief to sell common shares, each Fund will sell newly issued shares at a price no 

See Post-Effective Amendments to Investment Company Registration Statements, Investment Company 

Act Release No. 20486 (Aug. 17, 1994), n.22 and accompanying text. An Interval Fund operates pursuant to a 

fundamental policy that requires lhe Interval Fund to make periodic offers to repurchase its common stock in an 

amount not less than five percent ofthe outstanding shares. See Rule 23c-3 under the Investment Company Act. 

These repurchase offers may create a need for the Interval Fund to replenish its assets by making a continuous or 

intermittent offering of its common stock. See Continuous or Delayed Offerings by Certain Closed-End 

Management Investment Companies; Automatic Effectiveness ofCertain Registration Statements and Post-Effective 

Amendments, Investment Company Act Release No. 19391 (Apr. 7, 1993). 

See Pilgrim Letter, supra note I, at n.l2 and accompanying text. 

2 


2 
lower than the sum ofthe Fund' s net asset value plus the per share commission or underwriting 

discount.4 

Conclusion 

Based on the facts and representations set forth in your letter, we would not recommend 

that the Commission take any enforcement action under Section S(b) or Section 6(a) of the 

Securities Act against the Funds if the Funds file Post-Effective Amendments to their 

Registration Statements pursuant to Rule 486(b) under the Securities Act. This response 

expresses our view on enforcement action only and does not express any legal or interpretive 

conclusion on the issues presented. Because our position is based upon all of the facts and 

representations in your letter, any different facts or representations may require a different 

conclusion.5 We note that each Fund has acknowledged that the staff may withdraw any 

assurance granted in this letter ifthe staff finds that the Fund is misusing Rule 486(b) or for any 

other reason. 

W~~/~ 

Adam Glazer 

Senior Counsel 

4 See Pilgrim Letter, supra note 1, at n.4 and accompanying text. 

5 The Division oflnvestment Management generally permits third parties to rely on no-action or interpretive 

letters to the extent that the third party's facts and circumstances are substantially similar to those described in the 

underlying request for a no-action or interpretive letter. See Informal Guidance Program for Small Entities, 

Investment Company Act Release No. 22587 (Mar. 27, 1997), n.20 . In light ofthe very fact-specific nature of the 

Funds' request, however, the position expressed in this letter applies only to the Funds, and no other entity may rely 

on this position. The staff is willing to consider similar requests from other registered closed-end management 

investment companies . 

3 

L 

1933 Act - Section S(b) 

1933 Act - Section 6(a) 

1933 Act - Rule 486 

June 21, 2013 

Douglas J. Scheidt, Esq. 

Associate Director and Chief Counsel 

Division ofInvestment Management 

United States Securities and Exchange Commission 

100 F Street, N.E. 

Washington, DC 20549 

Dear Mr. Scheidt: 

On behalf of John Hancock Investors Trust (".THl") and John Hancock TaxAdvantaged Global Shareholder Yield Fund (" HTY") (together the "Funds" and each, 

indi vidually, a "Fund"), we seek assurance that the staff of the Division of Investment 

Management (the "Staff") will not recommend enforcement action against the Funds to the 

Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") under Section 5(b) or Section 6(a) 

of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), if the Funds utilize Rule 

486(b) of the Securiti es Act to file post-effective amendments to their registration statements 

in satisfaction of the undertakings contained in each Fund's registration statement, under the 

circumstances set forth in this letter. 

Background 

Each of the Funds is a closed-end management investment company that is registered 

lmder the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Investment Company Act"). 

Jolm Hancock Advisers, LLC serves as the investment adviser to the Funds, and each of the 

Funds has a fiscal year ending October 31. John Hancock Asset Management a division of 

Manulife Asset Management (US) LLC serves as the sub adviser to JHl. Epoch Investment 

Partners, Inc. and Analytic Investors, LLC serve as subadvisers to HTY Each Fund's 

common shares are registered under Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as 

amended, and have been listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange since the 

inception of the Fund. Each Fund has filed and has had declared effective by the 

Commission a shelf registration statement on Form N-2 pursuant to which it has registered, 

and may issue, securities in accordance with the terms of Rule 4I 5(a)(I)(x) under the 

Securities Act and the positions of the Staff articulated in Pilgrim America Prime Rate Trust 

BOS-3287768 v 13 0516895-0055\ 

klgates.com 
K&LIGATES 

Douglas J. Scheidt, Esq. 

June 2 1, 2013 

Page 2 

(pub. avail. May I, 1998) ("Pilgrim") and Nuveen Virginia Premium Income Municipal Fund 

(pub. avail. October 6, 2006) ("Nuveen I"). 

The Commission initially declared effective JHl" s shelf registration statement on 

Form N-2 (File Nos. 333- 181550; 811-04173) on August 14, 2012, and HTY's she lf 

registration statement on Form N-2 (File Nos. 333-1 81288; 811-22056) on November 1, 

20 12. JHI and HTY each subsequently filed a post-effective amendment to its shelf 

registration statement in January 23,2013 to update its financial statements in accordance 

with Rule 3-18 of Regulation S-X These post-effective amendments were reviewed by the 

Commission and declared effective on February 28 , 2013. 

The Board of Trustees (the "Board") of each Fund, including a majority of the 

independent trustees, has concluded that the ability to raise capital through the public 

offering of additional securities on a delayed and continuous basis benefits each Fund and its 

shareholders. The Board also has concluded that a continuously effective shelf registration 

statement is beneficial to each of the Funds, their shareholders and potential investors. 

However, the Funds might be unable to sell securities pursuant to their effecti ve shelf 

registration statements for significant portions of each year, to the detriment of the Funds and 

their shareholders, due to the post-effective amendment process currently required to bring 

the Funds' financial statements up to date. 

The Board of each Fund believes that the Funds, their shareholders and potential 

investors would benefit if the Funds were allowed to utili ze Rule 486(b) under the Securiti es 

Act, which is available to certain registered closed-end investment companies,' to fil e posteffective amendments to their shelf registration statements in order to bring their financial 

statements up to date, or to make any other non-matelial changes. Investors would benefit 

from the Funds' ability to raise capital in continuous offerings of their securities at nondilutive prices, without significant periods of disruption to such offering process. In addition, 

Fund shareholders would benefit from considerable cost savings, as expenses incurred in 

respect of the current post-effective amendment process are significant. Due to the limited 

purpose for which the Funds propose to use Rule 486(b), no erosion of investor protections 

would occur. 

I The Funds are nOI organized as interval funds pursuant to Rule 23c-3 under the Investment Company Ac t, and 

there fore Rule 486(b), on ils face, is nOl currently available to me Funds. 
K&L IGATES 


Douglas J. Scheidt, Esq. 

June 2 1, 20 13 

Page 3 

II. Discussion 

Secti on 5(b)(1) of the Securities Act makes it unlawful for any person directly or 

indirectly to transmit, through interstate commerce, a prospectus relating to any security wi th 

respect to which a registration statement has been filed, unless the prospectus meets the 

requirements of Section 10 of the Securities Act. Similarly, Section 5(b )(2) of the Securiti es 

Act makes it unlawful for any person directly or indirectl y to carry or cause to be carried any 

security for the purpose of sale or delivery, unl ess preceded or accompanied by a prospectus 

that meets the requirements of Section 10(a) of the Securities Act. 

Section 1O(a)(I) of the Securities Act, in pertinent part, states that a prospectus 

relating to a security - other than a security issued by a foreign issuer - shall contain the 

information contai ned in the issuer's registration statement. Section 1 0(a)(3) states that, 

notwithstanding Secti on 10(a)(I), a prospectus that is used more than nine months after the 

effective date of the registration statement must have information as of a date not more than 

sixteen months prior to such use, so far as the information is known to the user of the 

prospectus or can be furnished by the user of the prospectus without unreasonable effort or 

expense (a " I 0(a)(3) Prospectus"). 

Open-end management investment companies COpen-end Funds"), unit investment 

trusts, and face-amount certificate companies are required by Section 24(e) of the Investment 

Company Act to use a 10(a)(3) Prospectus that does not vary from the latest prospectus filed 

as part of a post-effective amendment to the fund 's registration statement. Open-end Funds 

satisfy this requirement by filing a post-effective amendment pursuant to Rul e 485, which 

provides for automatic or immediate effectiveness" Notably, however, Section 24(e) does 

not apply to closed-end management investment companies, and there is no statutory 

requirement mandating that a closed-end fund make such a post-effective filing3 Instead, 

Rule 415(a)(3) requires a registrant that is an investment company filing on Form N-2 to 

furnish the undertakings required by Item 34.4 of Form N-2. Item 34.4.a of Form N-2 

(which is the registrati on statement utilized by closed-end funds) requires closed-end funds to 

undertake "to fil e, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective 

2 Rule 485 (0) pennits automatic effectiveness after the passage ofa spec ified period of time. Ru le 485(b) 

provides for immedi ate effectiveness of fi lings made for certain purposes, including, among N her things, 

updating financial statements and making non·ma teria! changes. 

3 See SectIOn 24(e) of the Investment Company Act; L. Loss & 1. Seligman, Securities Regulation, 566 (3rd ed. 

1998). 
K&LIGATES 

Douglas J. Scheidt, Esq. 

June21 , 2013 

Page 4 

amendment to the registration statement: (I) to include any prospectus required by Section 

10(a)(3) of the 1933 Act." 

Each Fund has made this undertaking in its effective registration statement. As a 

consequence, each Fund currently is required to file a post-effective amendment on an annual 

basis to update its shelf registration statement with its audited finan cial statements in 

accordance with this undertaking, as well as to make any non-material updates. Each Fund 

will satisfy this undertaking by filing a post-effective amendment with the Commission 

pursuant to Section 8(c) of the Securities Act. Section 8(c) does not provide a mechanism for 

automatic effectiveness' A post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Section S(c) must be 

declared effective by the Staff in order to take effect. This process subj ects the filings to 

Staff review and comment, even for routine non-material amendments, which can be a 

lengthy process. During this period, no issuances can take place pursuant to the 

post-effective amendment, thereby potentially preventing the Funds from taking advantage of 

what may be an attractive market to raise assets for the benefit of Fund shareholders. 

Closed-end funds that are operated as interval funds pursuant to Rule 23c-3 under the 

Investment Company Act are not subject to these delays. Rule 486(b) provides that a posteffective amendment to an effective registration statement, or a registration statement for 

additional shares of common stock, filed by a registered closed-end management investment 

company or business development company which makes periodic repurchase offers under 

Rule 23c-3 under the Investment Company Act ("Interval Funds") shall become immediately 

effective on the date it is filed, or on a later date designated by the registrant that is no more 

than 30 days after the filing is made, provided that the post-effective amendment or 

registration statement is filed solely: (i) to register additional shares of common stock for 

which a registration statement filed on Form N-2 is effective, (ii) to bring the financial 

statements up to date under Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act or Rule 3-I S of Regulation 

S-X, (iii) to designate a new effective date for a previously filed post-effective amendment or 

registration statement for additional shares under Rule 486(a), which has not yet become 

effective, (iv) to disclose or update the information required by Item 9c of Form N_2,5 (v) to 

make any non-material changes the registrant deems appropri ate, and (vi) for any other 

purpose the Commission shall approve. 

4 But see supra no Ie 2 and accompanying text for a discussion of Rule 485, which provides for automatic and 

immediate effectiveness for Open-end Funds. 

5 We note that Fonn N-2 does not have, and has never had, an " Item 9c." Based upon a review of the 

adminisrrative history of Ru le 486, we believe that this should be a reference to Item 9.1.c. ofFonn N-2, which 

relates to information regarding individual portfolio managers. Accordingly, the Funds plan to treat the 

reference to " Item 9c" as a reference to Item 9.1.c. of Form N-2. 
K&L IGATES 

Douglas 1 Scheidt, Esq. 

June 21, 20 13 

Page 5 

In the adopting release for Rule 486, the Commission stated that a[t)he initial 

proposal of rul e 486 recognized that closed-end interval funds may need continuously 

effective registration statements and would benefit if certain filings could become effecti ve 

automatically. ,,6 The Funds believe that this line of thought should be extended to them as 

closed-end funds that are conducting offerings pursuant to Rule 415(a)(\ lex). 

Recently, your office has concurred with this approach. In Nuveen Municipal High 

Income Opportunity Fund (pub. avail. Nov. 9, 20 I 0) ("Nuveen II "), Calamos Advisors LLC 

(pub. avail. Feb. 14, 2011) ("Calamos"), and Aberdeen Australia Equity Fund, Inc. (pub. 

avail. April 12, 2012) ("Aberdeen"), the Staff granted no-action assurances to three closedend fund complexes that were engaged in a delayed or continuous offering pursuant to Rule 

415(a)(1 lex). In the letters, the Staff agreed not to recommend enforcement action to the 

Commission under Sections 5(b) and 6(a) of the Securities Act based on the representation 

that the respective funds' board of directors approved the funds' delayed or continuous 

offerings, the representation that each fund's post-effective amendments would comply with 

the conditions of Rule 486(b), and the representation that each fund would file a posteffective amendment containing a prospectus pursuant to Section 8(c) of the Securities Act 

prior to any offering of its securities at a price below net asset value. 

Your office has been clear that, "[i)n light of the very fac t specific nature" of the 

requests, this relief is limited on its face to the addressees of the no-action letters. Your 

office has gone on to note, however, that it " is willing to consider similar requests from other 

registered closed-end management investment companies. " 

We submit that the Funds are similarly situated to the funds in the Nuveen II, 

Calamos and Aberdeen letters for purposes of this relief. As was the case with each of the 

funds in the Nuveen II, Calamos and Aberdeen letters, each Fund' s Board, including a 

majority of its independent trustees, has concluded that the continued ability to raise capital 

through the public offering of additional securities on a delayed and continuous basis would 

benefit each Fund and its shareholders. In addition, each Fund 's Board has concluded that a 

continuously effective shelf registration statement would be beneficial to the Funds, their 

shareholders and potential investors. In futiherance of these conclusions, each Fund has an 

effective registration statement on file with the Commission pursuant to which the Fund may 

issue securities on a delayed and continuous basis in accordance with Rule 415 (a)( I)(x) 

GPost-EjJecflve Amendments to investmenL Company Registration SIQtements, SEC Re I. No. 33-7 083 (Aug. 17, 

1994). 
K&LiGATES 

Douglas J. Scheidt, Esq. 

June 21 , 201 3 

Page 6 

under the Securities Act and the positions of the Commission staff in the Nuveen [ and 

Pilgrim letters. 

As is the case with Interval Funds, the Funds and their common shareholders would 

also benefit from having continuously effective registration statements. The ability to utilize 

Rule 486(b) under the Securities Act would have significant benefits for the Funds and their 

investors: 

• 	 The Funds would have the ability to raise capital as the opportunity arises; 

• 	 The Funds would reduce the expenses they presently incur as part of the 

registration statement review and comment process, thus benefiting 

shareholders; and 

• 	 Investors could have faster access to important information about the Funds, 

including their updated financial information. 

In addition, because Rule 486(b) would only permit the Funds to update their 

financial statements, or to make non-material changes to their registration statements, the 

Funds believe that the public policy of protecting investors would be safeguarded. The 

Funds represent that in each case such filings would be made in compliance with the 

conditions of Rule 486(b), and that each Fund will file a post-effective amendment 

containing a prospectus pursuant to Section 8(c) of the Securities Act prior to any offering of 

its securities at a price below net asset value. Each Fund that relies on the requested relief to 

sell common shares will sell newl y issued shares at a price no lower than the sum of the 

Fund's net asset value plus the per share commission or underwriting discount 7 

The Funds would utilize Rul e 486(b) to file post-effective amendments only for 

purposes of: (1) bringing the financial statements of a Fund up to date under Section 10(a)(3) 

of the Securities Act or Rule 3-1 8 of Regulation S-X, (2) to update the infonnation required 

by Item 9.I.c of Form N-2, or (3) to make an y non-material changes the registrant deems . 8 appropnate. 

7 See Calamos Convenible OppOItun1!Jes and Income Fund (pub. avail. Feb. 14, 20 1 I). 

8 The Funds would not seek to use a tiling made in accordance with Rule 486(b) to register additional securities 

without first obtaining relief from Rule 4) 3 under the Securities Act 
K&LiGATES 

Douglas J. Scheidt, Esq. 

June21,2013 

Page 7 

III. Conclusion 

In light of the forgoing, we seek your assurances that the Staff will deem the Funds to 

have complied with their undertaking provided in response to Item 34.4.a of FOll) N-2, and 

will not recommend enforcement action against the Funds to the Commission under Section 

S(b) or Section 6(a) of the Securities Act if the Funds utilize Rule 486(b) of the Securities 

Act, under the circumstances set forth above. 

Each Fund acknowledges that the Staff may withdraw any assurance granted in 

response to this letter ifthe Staff finds that the Fund is misusing Rule 486(b), or for any other 

reason. Please contact the undersigned at (617) 261- 3163, with any questions or comments 

regarding this letter. 

Mark P. Goshko 

cc: 

US Securities and Exchange Commission 

Thomas M. Kinzler 


Kinga Kapuscinski 


John Hancock Funds