1 EPA REGI STRATION DIVISION COMPANY NOTICE OF FILING FOR PESTI CI DE PETI TI ONS PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGI STER EPA Registration Division contact: Kable Bo Davis (703)306 - 0415 Dow AgroSciences LLC 4F8249EPA has received a pesticide petition 4F8249 from Dow AgroSciences LLC , 9330 Zionsville Road, In dianapolis, I N 46268 proposing, pursuant to section 408(d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d), to amend 40 CFR part 180. 417 by

establishing a tolerance for residues of triclop yr , [(3,5,6 - trichloro - 2 - py ridinyl)ox y] acetic acid, including its metabolites and degradates , in or on the raw agricultural commodity milk, fat at 0. 7 ppm ; and increasing the tolerance in milk from 0.01 ppm to 0.03 ppm . EPA has determined that the petition contains data or information regarding the e lements set forth in section 408 (d)(2) of FDDCA; however, EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the submitted data at this time or whether the data supports granting of the petition. Additional data may be needed before EPA rules on the petition. A. Residue Chemistry . 1. Plant metabolism . The nature of residues is adequatel y understood and anal yt ical methods are available for the determinatio n of triclopy r in milk and milk fat (cream) . EPA has established that the qualitative nature of the residue is adequatel y understood based on two studies with [ 14 C] triclopyr on grass . Nature of residue studies have shown th at majority of the total radioactive residue was triclop yr. No significant amounts of the metabolites 3,5,6 - tri cihloro - 2 - py ridinol and 2 - methoxy- 3,5,6 - trichloropy

ridine were detected. The Agency ’s HED Metabolism Committee has concluded that the residue t o be regulated in grass is triclopy r **.** 2. Analytical method. Adequate methodology is available for the enforcement of tolerances for triclop yr residues of concern. Gas chromatograph y methods are available for the determination of triclopy r residues of concern. Residues of triclop yr , 3,5,6 - trichloro - 2 - py

ridinol, and 2 - methoxy- 3,5,6 - trichloropy ridine can be separately determined **.** 3. Magnitude of residues . Magnitudes of residue studies (MOR) on grass were conducted in 1987, 1976, and 1974 and had been previously submitted. All samples were anal yz ed for triclopy

r using method ACR 77.4. Brief summaries of the MOR studies are as follows: The 1987 MOR study

w as conducted at 11 sites located in 10 different states across the United States (3). XRM - 4714 formulation (4 lb ae/gal), containing triclopyr as butoxyeth ylester, was applied on activel y growing grass as an aqueous diluted ground2 broadcast spray

at a si ngle nominal application rate of 2.0, 4.0, or 6.0 lb ae/A. Grass forage and hay

were collected at different sampling intervals of 0 - 28 day s after application. Grass forage samples were frozen after collection while hay samples were dried before freezing. The 1976 MOR study

was conducted at 3 sites using XRM - 4021 formulation (4 lb ae/gal) containing triclop yras butoxyeth ylester (2). XRM - 4021 was applied as an aqueous diluted spray

at a single nominal rate of 1.5 lb ae/A, either as ground (NY and OR sit es) or aerial (MO site) application. Grass forage samples were collected at different sampling intervals of 0 - 365 day s after application and were frozen after collection. The 1974 MOR study

was conducted at 7 sites located in 6 different states across th e United States (1). All 7 sites received ground application and one site received an aerial application, in addition. XRM - 3724 formulation (3 lb ae/gal), containing triclopy r as triethyamine salt, was applied on activel y growing grass as an aqueous diluted spray at a single nominal application rate of 1.5 lb ae/A. Grass forage samples were collected at different sampling intervals of 0 - 365 day s after application and were frozen after collection. An acceptable dairy

cattle feeding study has been submitt ed to the Agency. Three lactating Holstein dairy

cows were fed with diets containing triclop yr in increasing doses for two - week period per dose at rates equivalent to 0 - 1000 ppm feed. Daily milk from each cow was sampled by combining 1⁄2 pint from the even ing milking with an equal amount collected following morning. Cream samples were collected from the morning milk by pooling 11⁄2 gallon of milk from each cow at 100 or 1000 ppm doses. The revised tolerance of triclop yr in milk is 0.03 ppm and the new tolerance in milk fat is 0.70 ppm. These proposed tolerances were derived from the worst case animal dietary burden, which was estimated from grass commodities containing triclop yr at tolerance levels of 700 ppm for grass forage and 200 ppm for grass hay and ar e adequate to allow grazing of lactating dairy

cattle on pasture or rangeland treated with triclopy r formulations according to label. B. Toxicological Profile . 1. Acute toxicity. Acute toxicity studies were performed with triclopy r acid, triclopy r - TEA , and triclopy

r - BEE. i. For triclop yr acid, the acute oral LD50 was 729 mg/kg for males and 630 mg/kg for females; while acute dermal LD50 was >2000 mg/kg. ii. For triclop yr - TEA, the acute oral LD50 was 1847 mg/kg for males and females; the acute dermal LD50 was >2000 mg/kg; the acute inhalation LC50 was >2.6 mg/L ; it was corrosive to eyes, not irritating to skin but was a skin sensitizer . iii. For triclopyr - BEE, the acute oral LD50 was 803 mg/kg for males and females; the acute dermal LD50 was > 2000 mg/kg; the acute inhalation LC50 was >4.8 mg/L ; it was minimal irritation to eyes, not irritating to skin but was a skin sensitizer .3 The developmental NOAELof 100 mg/kg/day from a rat developmental study with triclopy

r BEE was recommended for the ac ute dietary risk assessment for general population. This NOAEL was selected based on the toxicity observed at the next highest dose (lowest effect level) of 300 mg/kg/day in which mortality , clinical signs, decreased body weight gains, decreased food cons umption, increased water consumption, and increased relative kidney and liver weights were recorded. However, the reference dose for acute dietary

risk assessment for females (13 - 50 years old) is based on a 2 - generation reproductive toxicity

study with tri clop yr acid in rats with a NOAEL of 5 mg/kg/day and uncertainty factor of 100. The NOAEL was selected based on the increased incidence of F2 pup with exencephal y and ablepharia at the next dose level of 25 mg/kg/day. Thus, the population sub - group of parti cular interest that would be evaluated in the acute exposure assessment are females (13 - 50 years old). 2. Genotoxicty. i. Triclopy

r acid was negative (non - mutagenic) in an Ames assay with and without hepatic enzy

me activation. Itwas also negative in a rec - assay in B. subtilis , in host - mediated assay

at doses up to 70 mg/kg in mice, in cy togenetic assay

for chromosomal aberration at doses up to 70 mg/kg administrated singly or for 5 day s to rats. Triclop yr acid did not produce any evidence of unscheduled DNA s ynthesis, as determined b y radioactive tracer procedures (nuclear silver grain counts), in rat primary hepatocy te cultures exposed up to cy totoxic levels. It was negative for the dominant lethal mutagenic effect in treated male rats wh ich were fed for 9 consecutive weeks at doses up to 70 mg/kg/day and mated to virgin females. Triclop yr acid was negative for the dominant lethal mutagenic effect in treated male rats at doses up to 70 mg/kg/day given b y oral intubation followed by mating to 2 untreated females per week for 7 weeks. ii. Triclopy

r - BEE was non - mutagenic, in an Ames assay with and without hepatic enz ym e activation, was not clastogenic in mouse micronucleus test up to 600 mg/kg (HDT) and did not cause DNA damage or inducible repair in the rat hepatocy te unscheduled DNA sy

nthesis. On the basis of the results from this battery of tests, it is concluded that, triclop yr is not mutagenic or genotoxic. 3. Reproductive and developmental toxicity . i . Developmental toxicity in the rat with triclopy

r acid, the maternal NOAEL was < 50 mg/kg/day

and maternal LOAEL was 50 mg/kg/day based on increased clinical signs. The developmental NOAEL was 100 mg/kg/day and developmental L OAEL was 200 mg/kg/day

based on increased incidence of fetuses and litters with retarded ossification of skull bones, and two litters (one fetus per litter) with cleft palate and brach yc ephal y. ii . Developmental toxicity in the rat with triclopy r - BEE, the maternal NOAEL was 100 mg/kg/day

and maternal LOAEL was 300 mg/kg/day based on mortality , clinical signs, necrops y findings, decreased body weight gains, decreased food consumption, increased water consumption, and increased relative kidney and l iver4 weight. The developmental NOAEL was 100 mg/kg/day and developmental L OAEL was 300 mg/kg/day

based on increased incidence of h ydrocephalus, cleft palate, microphthalmia/anophthalmia, retinal folds, thin diaphragm/protrusion of the liver, decreased fetal weight and visceral and skeletal anomalies and variants. ii i . Developmental toxicity in the rabbit with triclopy r - BEE, the maternal NOAEL was 30 mg/kg/day and maternal LOAEL was 100 mg/kg/day based on mortality . The developmental NOAELwas 30 mg/kg/day and developmental LOAEL was 100 mg/kg/day

based on decreased total live fetuses and increased total fetal deaths, as well as increased fetal and/or litter incidence of skeletal anomalies and variants. iv . Developmental toxicity in the rat with triclopy r - TEA, the maternal NOAEL was 100 mg/kg/day

and maternal LOAEL was 300 mg/kg/day based on mortality . The developmental NOAEL was 100 mg/kg/day and developmental LOAEL was 300 mg/kg/day

based on decreased fetal weight, increased fetal and litter incidence of skeletal anomalies, increased fetal incidence of unossified sternebrae. v . Developmental toxicity in the rabbit with triclopy r - TEA, the maternal NOAEL was 30 mg/kg/day and maternal LOAEL was 100 mg/kg/day based on mortality , abortions, decreased body we ight gain, decreased food efficiency , increased liver and kidney weight. The developmental NOAEL was 30 mg/kg/day and developmental LOAEL was 100 mg/kg/day based on decreased live fetuses and increased embryonic deaths due to abortions. v i. Two - generation reproduction toxicity study in rats, the parental/sy stemic NOAEL was 5 mg/kg/day in males and in females and parental/sy stemic LOAEL was 25 mg/kg/day

in males and females based on increased incidence of proximal tubular degeneration in male and female P1 and P2 rats. The reproductive/offspring NOAEL was 5 mg/kg/day

in males and females and reproductive/offspring LOAEL was 25 based on increased incidence of F2 pups with exencephaly and ablepharia. 4. Sub c hronic toxicity. i. Ina 90 - day

oral study in rats with triclopy r acid, the NOAEL was 5 mg/kg/day

in males and females, and LOAEL was 20 mg/kg/day in males and females based on degeneration of the proximal tubules of the kidney s. ii. In a 90 - day

oral study

in rats with triclopy

r - BEE, the NO AEL was 7 mg/kg/day

in males and < 7 mg/kg/day in females, and LOAEL was 28 mg/kg/day in males, 7 mg/kg/day

based on increased relative kidney weight (M) and decreased red blood cell content, hemoglobin content, and packed cell volume (F). Degeneration of the proximal tubules of the kidney s was seen in males at 70 and 350 mg/kg/day and females at 350 mg/kg/day

highest dose tested (HDT). i ii. Ina 183 - day oral study in dogs with triclopy r acid, the NOAEL was ≤2.5 mg/kg/day

(HDT) in males and females, and LOAELwas >2.5 mg/kg/day in males and5 females based on toxicologically non - significant decreased rate of phenolsulfothalein (PSP) due to competition between triclop yrand PSP for renal exc retion. i v . Ina 3 - week dermal study on rabbits with triclopy r - BEE, the NOAEL was 1000 mg/kg/day

(males and females), and LOAEL was >1000 mg/kg/day based on decreased alkaline phosphatase in both sexes and increased absolute and relative liver weight in males were considered marginal and not of toxicological significance.] 5. Chronic toxicity . i. Ina 228 - day feeding study in dogs with triclopyr acid, the NOAEL was 10 mg/kg/day

in males and females, and LOAEL was 20 mg/kg/day in males and females based on decreased body weight gain (in males), decreased hematological parameters (in males), changes in clinical chemistry (in both sexes), and liver histopathology (in both sexes). ii. In a 1 - year feeding study in dogs with triclop yr acid, the NOAEL was ≤5 mg/kg/day

in males and females, and LOAEL was > 5 mg/kg/day in males and females based on changes in clinical chemistry which are due not to toxicity , but a phy siologic response of the dog based on limited ability of the dog to excrete organic acids at higher plasma concentrations. iii. In a 2 - ye ar rat chronic / carcinogenicity study with triclopy

r acid the NOAEL was 12 mg/kg/day in males, ≤ 36 mg/kg/day in females, and LOAELwas 36 in males, >36 mg/kg/day

in females based on marginal increases in proximal tubular degeneration at 6 months. Increase in adrenal gland pheochromocy toma in males and significant trend (<0.05) for mammary gland adenocarcinoma in females. iv. In 22 - months mouse chronic / carcinogenicity s tudy with triclopy

r acid the NOAEL was 84 mg/kg/day in males, 109.5 mg/kg/day in females , and LO AEL was 143 mg/kg/day

in males, 135 mg/kg/day in females based on decreased weight gain . No evidence of carcinogenicity in males, but females had a significant trend (< 0.05) for mammary

gland adenocarcinoma. EPA has established the reference dose (RfD) for triclopy r at 0.05 mg/kg/day

for chronic risk assessment. The RfD is based on a 2 - generation reproductive toxicity study with triclopy

r acid in rats with a NOAEL of 5 mg/kg/day and uncertainty

factor of 100. The NOAEL was selected based on th e increased incidence of proximal tubular degeneration in some P1 and P2 parents of both sexes at the next dose level of 25 mg/kg/day . 6. Animal metabolism. Disposition and metabolism of 14 C - triclopy r in rats demonstrated that triclopy r was well absorbed after oral administration. Excretion was relativel y rapid with a majority of radioactivity eliminated in the urine by 24 hours. At the high dose of 60 mg/kg, urinary elimination of 14 **C** - triclopy r was decreased due to apparent saturation of renal elimination mechanisms. Fecal elimination of 14 C - triclopy r6 was a minor route of excretion, as was elimination via exhaled air. Un - metabolized parent chemical represented >90% of urinary radioactivity , with the remainder accounted for b y the metab olite 3,5,6 - trichloro - 2 - py ridinol (3,5,6 - TCP), and possible glucuranide and/or sulfate conjugates of 3,5,6 - TCP. Plasma elimination following intravenous administration of 14 C - triclopy r was consistent with a one - compartment model with an elimination half

- li fe of 3.6 hour and zero - order kinetics from 0 - 12 hours at the 60 mg/kg dose. 7. Metabolite toxicology . Inanimal metabolism studies, <10% 3,5,6 - trichloro 2 - py ridinol (TCP) was found as a significant metabolite. Toxicity of TCP was studies in a toxicity package of studies viz. acute, sub - chronic, genotoxicity , developmental toxicity studies revealed that the TCP has similar toxicity as of parent molecule, triclopy r. EPA in 1998 has also made the same conclusion i n EPA R.E.D facts on triclopy r. 8. Bioequ ivalency . T oxicology studies conducted with triclopy r have been performed using both the free acid and the triethyl amine salt from of triclopyr. Bioequivalency

of the two chemical forms of triclopy r has been addressed through the conduct of special studies with the triethylamine from of triclopy r. These studies, which included data on comparative disposition, plasma half - life, tissue distribution, hydrol yt ic cleavage under ph ys iological and environm ental conditions for triclopy r triethylamine salt were found to adequately address the issue of bioequivalency . In addition, subchronic toxicity

studies supported the pharmacokinetics data in demonstrating bioequivalence. Therefore, studies conducted with any one f orm of triclopy

r can be used to support the toxicology database as a whole. 9 . Endocrine disruption . The examination of the existing triclopy r data - set including reproductive toxicity studies did not reveal any potential for specific modulatio n of endocrine sy stems in the test species. There is no evidence to suggest that triclopy r has an effect on the endocrine s ys tem. 10 . Immunotoxicity . The existing data - set on the triclopy r does not suggest any indication of immunotoxic potential of triclop yr. However, recently, a 28 - day immunotoxicity

study was conducted on the male F344/DuCrl (most sensitive species and sex for triclopy

r toxicity). Triclopy

r up to 250 mg/kg/day

did not caused the immunotoxicity

in rats confirms the non - immunotoxic p otential of triclopy r. 1 1 . Neurotoxicity . There is no indication that triclopy r is a neurotoxic chemical and there is no need for a developmental neurotoxicity study or additional UFs to account for neurotoxicity , as also specified in the Triclopy r Pest icide Tolerance document (2002) . 12 . Carcinogenicity . A cancer risk assessment is not required. The Agency ’s Carcinogenicity Peer Review Committee, according to 1986 Guideline for carcinogenic risk assessment, has established that triclopy r is classified as “Group D chemical”

– not classifiable as to human carcinogenicity (16). The guidelines on Agency ’s cancer classification have been changed. According to the current Guidelines (2005) triclopy r would be classified as ‘Not likely to be carc inogenic to humans’ which would be equivalent to ‘Group D chemical’ classification per 1986 Guidelines.7 C. Aggregate Exposure 1. Dietary exposure. The exposure and risk resulting from agricultural uses of triclopy r was considered for the U.S. population and special sub - populations. There are two direct sources of exposure to humans considering triclop yr ’s uses across all labels: from food intake and from consuming drinking water . The exposure and risk are estimated in this report for different durations of both routes of exposure and their aggregated contribution. In an aggregate assessment, exposures from food residues were combined with conservative estimates of potential water residues , as well as potential residential exposure . The current approach of the EPA Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) is to use a tiered approach for acute dietary risk assessment that proceeds from very conservative assumptions about food residues, to inclusion of more realistic residue values measured closer to the point of consumption. i. Food. The process of dietary risk assessment of pesticides considers chronic and acute exposures to the U.S. population and sensitive population sub - groups. A ddi tional exposures from potential residues in drinking water were also combined with acute and chronic food exposure estimat ions . The Dietary

Exposure Evaluation Model (DEEM - FCID, version 2. 1 4), a commercially available software package, was used to estimat e exposure to triclopy r via food consumption by

the general U.S. population and certain subgroups. The model combined the consumption data and residue data for a given pesticide to anal yz e dietary risk. Food consumption data from the USDA Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals (CSFII) conducted from 1994 through 1998 including the children's supplemental survey

were used in this assessment. The food consumption data, i.e., foods as consumed, we re translated into raw agricultural commodities and their food forms using recipe translation files contained within the DEEM software. a. Acute dietary exposure . EPA has established an acute reference dose (aRfD) for the purpose of the acute dietary assessment set at 0. 05 mg/kg/day for f emales 13 - 50 ye ars old , the population sub - group of concern. This was based on the NOAELof 5 mg/kg/day

is based on a 2 - generation reproductive toxicity study with triclopy

r acid in rats with a NOAEL of 5.0 mg/kg/day and uncertainty factor of 100. The 100 - fold safety factor includes intraspecies and interspecies variations. Exposures from all existing and proposed residues result in very low acute exposures . Using the above assumptions for the assessment, the food + refined water exposure to triclopy r for females 13 - 50 ye ars old at the 95 th percentile was estimated to be 0.0 0 2067 mg/kg/day that utilized 4.1 % of the aRfD. b. Chronic dietary exposure . EPA has established a chronic reference dose (cRfD) for triclop yr at 0.0 5 mg/kg/day for all population subgroups. The cRfD is based on a 2 - generation reproductive toxicity study in rats with a NOAEL of 5.0 mg/kg/day and uncertainty factor of 100. The 100 - fold safety factor includes intraspecies and interspecies variations. No additional FQPA safety factor is required. The food + refined8 water exposure for the overall U.S. population was estimated for the assessment to be 0.00 0 971 mg/kg/day that utilize d 1.9 % of the cRfD using the refined Tier 2 conservative exposure assumptions of 100% crop treated , tolerance values and USDA - PDP refined water values . The population subgroup with the highest potential for exposure was Children 1 - 2 years old with food + water exposure of 0.0 02 800 mg/kg/day that represented 5.6 % of the cRfD. c. Cancer dietary exposure . A cancer risk assessment is not required . ii. Drinking Wa ter. Direct measurements of triclopy r in drinking water were available from USDA - PDP sources which were more realistic than e stimates of potential water concentrations resulting from agricultural use of triclop yr were using two environmental models, SCI - GROW and GENEEC which assum es certain environmental degradation properties for triclopy r and modeled dy

namics of ground water and surface water bodies. Based on the USDA - PDP monitoring data for the 2002 - 2003 timeframe, the average concentration from drinking water sources in multiple states across 8 99 water samples with triclopy

r at or above the LOD, was 24.9 ppt (0.0000249 ppm). This number is appropriate for refined chronic dietary assessment. Based upon PDP data, water samples were measured from 2002 - 2010, inclusive of both maximum and average concentrations from drinking water sources in multiple states. A total of 3261 water samples were anal yz ed for triclopy r. Of the 3261 samples, 565 had detects of triclopy r at or above the Level of Detection (LOD). The maximum concentration during this period of time was 566 ppt (0.000566 ppm). This refined number is appropriate for re fined acute dietary

assessment. The potential, acute, aggregate exposures from food and drinking water for females 13 - 50 ye ars old is approximately 0.0 0 2067 mg/kg - bw/day or 4 . 3 % of the acute reference dose (aRfD) for the upper 9 5 th %tile of the population using an assessment refined for water . Potential chronic exposure to water residues was estimated using 0.0249 ppb for the two commodities, i.e., “water, direct, all sources” and “water, indirect, all sources” for input to DEEM - F CI D for chronic water (Tier II) anal ys is. After considering all existing and proposed uses, the exposure to triclop yr residues is 5.6 % of the chronic reference dose for the most exposed population sub - group, Children 1 - 2 year s old . 2. Non - dietary exposure . Triclopy r is currently

registered for use that could result in short - term and intermediate - term residential exposure and the Agency has determined that it is appropriate to aggregate chronic food and water and short - term exposures for triclopy r, as well as aggregate chronic food and water and intermediate - term exposures for triclop yr . D. Cumulative Effects . Dow AgroSciences has submitted to EPA an assessment of common mechanism of toxicity of triclop yr and other related compounds. Data indic ate that cumulative toxicological effects of triclopy r with other environmental compounds are unlikely .9 Triclopy r also shares a common metabolite, 2,5,6 - trichloro - 2 - py ridinol (TCP) with the insecticide chlorp yri fos / chlorpy rifos - methyl . The Agency found no risk of concern based on the assessment of likely combined exposures to TCP from both triclopy r and chlorpy rifos / chlorp yrifos - methyl . E. Safety Determination 1. U.S. population. Using the above conservative exposure assumptions an d taking into account the completeness and reliability of the toxicity

data, acute and chronic dietary food exposure to triclopy r from milk, and milk fat using tolerance values and re finement (Tier 2) of the water values using USDA - PDP data, resulted in ri sk estimates of 1.9 % of cRfD for the general U. S. population when the amended milk tolerance and additional milk fat tolerance w as included in the assessment with all existing uses of triclopy r . Generall y, EPA has no concern for exposures below 100% of the chronic reference dose (cRfD) because the cRfD represents the level at or below which daily dietary exposures over a lifetime will not pose appreciable risks to human health. Likewise, the acute dietary food exposure at 95 th percentile for f emales 13 - 50 ye ars old , the population sub - group of concern is 4.1 % of acute reference dose (aRfD). Therefore, there is no concern for exposure because the acute RfD represents the level at or below which a single dail y exposure will not pose appreciable risks to human health. Cancer dietary

risk assessment was not required . Short - term and intermediate - term risks are considered appropriate to aggregate with chronic food and water exposures for triclopy r . Adjusting for the above newly calculated exposure for food and water (mg/kg per day) resulting from amended and proposed tolerances, short - and intermediate - term aggregate MOEs do not exceed the LOC. Therefore, based on these risk assessments, Dow AgroSci ences concludes that there is reasonable certainty

that no harm will result to the U. S. population from aggregate exposure to triclopy

r residues. 2. Infants and children . EPA uses a weight evidence approach in determining what safety factor is appropriate for assessing risks to infants and children. This approach takes into account the nature and severity of the effects observed in pre - and post - natal studies and other inf ormation such as epidemiological data. The completeness and adequacy

of the toxicity

database is also considered. Toxicity database and exposure data for triclop yr are complete. EPA has considered in utero and/or postnatal exposure in the acceptable pren atal developmental toxicity studies with rat and rabbits as well as in a 2 - generation reproductive toxicity study in rats. EPA has previousl y determined that no additional safety factor to protect infants and children is necessary

for triclop yr for assessi ng risk to infants and children . Using the conservative assumptions described above, the chronic dietary exposure to triclopy r will utilize 1 .8 % of the cRfD for All Infants (<1 yr old), 5 . 6 % of the cRfD for10 children 1 - 2 y

rs old and 4. 3 % of the cRfD for children 3 - 5 y rs old. In assessing the potential for additional sensitivity of infants and children to residues of triclopy r , data from developmental toxicity studies in rats and rabbits and a 2 - generation reproduction study in the rat are considered . The developmental toxicity studies are designed to evaluate adverse effects on the developing organism resulting from pesticide exposure during prenatal development. Reproduction studies provide information relating to effects from exposure to the pest icide on the reproductive capability and potential sy stemic toxicity of mating animals and on various parameters associated with the well - being of offspring. The completeness and adequacy of the toxicity

data base is also considered. EPA has previously d etermined that no additional safety factor to protect infants and children is necessary for triclopy

r and that the RfD of 0.0 5 mg/kg/day is appropriate for assessing risk to infants and children. Therefore, based on the completeness and reliability of the toxicity

data and the conservative exposure assessment, Dow AgroSciences concludes with reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from the aggregate exposure to triclopy r from all current and proposed ending uses. F. Intern ational Tolerances . MRL s for residues of triclopy r have been established by Australia , Canada, and Japan . Based upon a review of the tolerance values it can be concluded that the tolerances in milk and related commodities are not harmonized. The disharmony

may be attributed to differing definitions of the milk commodity and the corresponding fat content.