alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   12-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-28-1996
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-28-1996
[CASH]                                         310,520
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                               18,967,447
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                 30,748,132
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                             1,038,766
[PP&E]                                      19,185,350
[DEPRECIATION]                                       0
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                              74,420,540
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                       11,438,838
[BONDS]                                              0
[COMMON]                                     5,191,454
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[OTHER-SE]                                  47,628,177
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                74,420,540
[SALES]                                    160,683,890
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                           161,436,145
[CGS]                                      125,703,090
[TOTAL-COSTS]                              125,703,090
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                            28,597,948
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                           3,176,589
[INCOME-PRETAX]                              3,958,518
[INCOME-TAX]                                 1,250,000
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                          2,708,518
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                 2,708,518
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                      .59
[EPS-DILUTED]                                      .59
</TABLE>
### §460jj–3. Permits for facilities and services

The Secretary shall cooperate with other Federal agencies, with State and local public agencies, and with private individuals and organizations in the issuance of permits for facilities and services in the Arapaho National Recreation Area and the development and operation of those facilities and services.

(Pub. L. 95–450, §7, Oct. 11, 1978, 92 Stat. 1097.)
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819 

DCN: SE02994

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
### §2002. Definitions

As used in this chapter:

(1) The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of Agriculture.

(2) The term "soil, water, and related resources" means those resources which come within the scope of the programs administered and participated in by the Secretary of Agriculture.

(3) The term "soil and water conservation program" means a set of guidelines for attaining the purposes of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 95–192, §3, Nov. 18, 1977, 91 Stat. 1407; Pub. L. 103–354, title II, §246(f)(2)(B), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3225.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Par. (2). Pub. L. 103–354 struck out "through the Soil Conservation Service" after "Agriculture".

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Enforcement functions of Secretary or other official in Department of Agriculture, insofar as they involve lands and programs under jurisdiction of that Department, related to compliance with this chapter with respect to pre-construction, construction, and initial operation of transportation system for Canadian and Alaskan natural gas transferred to Federal Inspector, Office of Federal Inspector for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System, until first anniversary of date of initial operation of Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System, see Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1979, §§102(f), 203(a), 44 F.R. 33663, 33666, 93 Stat. 1373, 1376, effective July 1, 1979, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees. Office of Federal Inspector for the Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System abolished and functions and authority vested in Inspector transferred to Secretary of Energy by section 3012(b) of Pub. L. 102–486, set out as an Abolition of Office of Federal Inspector note under section 719e of Title 15, Commerce and Trade. Functions and authority vested in Secretary of Energy subsequently transferred to Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Projects by section 720d(f) of Title 15.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-41191

Summary Calendar

 

MARK CRAWFORD,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BRUCE CHRISTIAN, Individually and Official Capacities;

SHARYLAND INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Defendants-Appellees.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

B-00-CV-151

 

May 30, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Mark Crawford appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

claims against Sharyland Independent School District and Bruce

Christian for excessive corporal punishment. Crawford argues that

excessive corporal punishment is a violation of substantive due

process, and should be actionable under § 1983. He acknowledges

that under our existing precedent his claims are without merit, but
1 Moore v. Willis Indep. Sch. Dist., 233 F.3d 871, 874 (5th

Cir. 2000).

2 Id. at 876.

he seeks to preserve the issue for further review.

We have consistently held that a public school student cannot

state a § 1983 claim for denial of substantive due process based on

excessive corporal punishment.1 The magistrate judge properly

dismissed Crawford’s § 1983 claims.

It is also well-established that Texas provides adequate state

remedies for excessive corporal punishment.2 Thus Crawford’s

argument that he should be allowed to proceed against the School

District because Texas provides no remedy is foreclosed.

AFFIRMED.
#### § 76.13 Parties to the hearing.

The parties to the hearing shall be the United States of America and the respondent.
### §2702. Loans for feasibility studies

#### (a) Loan authority

The Secretary, after consultation with the Commission, is authorized to make a loan to any municipality, electric cooperative, industrial development agency, nonprofit organization, or other person to assist such person in defraying up to 90 percent of the costs of—

(1) studies to determine the feasibility of undertaking a small hydroelectric power project at an existing dam or dams and

(2) preparing any application for a necessary license or other Federal, State, and local approval respecting such a project at an existing dam or dams and of participating in any administrative proceeding regarding any such application.

#### (b) Cancellation

The Secretary may cancel the unpaid balance and any accrued interest on any loan granted pursuant to this section if he determines on the basis of the study that the small hydroelectric power project would not be technically or economically feasible.

(Pub. L. 95–617, title IV, §402, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3154.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Secretary, referred to in text, and the Commission, referred to in subsec. (a), mean the Secretary of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, respectively, see section 2602(3), (14) of this title.
### §365. Taxation, under State laws

The consent of the United States is given for the taxation, under the authority of the laws of the State of Arkansas applicable to the equal taxation of personal property in that State, as personal property of all structures and other property in private ownership on the Hot Springs National Park.

(Mar. 3, 1891, ch. 533, §5, 26 Stat. 844; Mar. 4, 1921, ch. 161, §1, 41 Stat. 1407.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Hot Springs National Park" substituted in text for "Hot Springs Reservation" pursuant to act Mar. 4, 1921.
### SUBCHAPTER LI–A—NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER
§ 91.58 Timing of the environmental review process. ( a ) *Initial planning and site selection phase.* The NEPA procedures must be initiated as part of the planning and site selection phase of all new construction, expansion, and renovation projects and completed before the construction or renovation on the project can begin.
( b ) *Early consultation with OJP.* As grantees identify proposed, new projects, the grantees must inform OJP and after consulting OJP's *Program Guidance on Environmental Protection Requirements,* must recommend to OJP whether: ( 1 ) The proposed project meets the criteria of a categorical exclusion;
( 2 ) An environmental assessment should be initiated;
( 3 ) Because of the project size and/or anticipated environmental impacts, an environmental impact statement should be initiated.
( c ) *Design phase.* Projects currently in the planning and design phase must complete the NEPA procedures and no further decisions or new commitments of resources can be made on these projects by the State or local entity that would either have an adverse impact on the environment or limit the choice of reasonable alternative sites.
( d ) *Prohibited pre-analysis activities.* None of the following actions can be taken until the NEPA analysis is completed for the affected project: ( 1 ) Starting construction;
( 2 ) Accepting construction bids;
( 3 ) Advertising for construction bids;
( 4 ) Initiating the development of or approving final plans and specifications; or
( 5 ) Purchasing property.
( e ) *Ongoing or completed construction projects.* For grant-funded projects under construction, OJP will work with the States to determine what environmental analysis has been done, making every effort to limit disruption to projects under construction. For completed grant-funded projects, OJP will work with the States to determine whether those projects may pose continuing environmental problems. For example, NEPA issues may exist due to excessive noise, light pollution, excessive water consumption or draw down on an important stream, or adverse visual impact due to an inappropriate facade color in an environmentally scenic area. Consequently, performing an analysis for those VOI/TIS VOI/TIS projects for which construction is completed may still serve the useful purpose of determining the extent of a project's continuing adverse environmental impacts, and the feasibility of mitigation measures.
( f ) *Avoiding duplication of efforts.* If an EA or EIS was completed on an original structure, any environmental research that was conducted at the time the original structure was being planned and is still relevant need not be duplicated in any required environmental impact analysis for proposed modifications or additions to that structure.
#### § 230.101 Purpose.

The purpose of the regulations in this subpart is to prescribe the policies, procedures, and guides relative to the implementation of an equal employment opportunity program on Federal and Federal-aid highway construction contracts, except for those contracts awarded under 23 U.S.C. 117, and to the preparation and submission of reports pursuant thereto.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsJoint US/Russia TU-144 Engine Ground TestsTwo engine research experiments were recently completed in Moscow, Russia using an engine from the Tu-144 supersonic transport airplane. This was a joint project between the United States and Russia. Personnel from the NASA Lewis Research Center, General Electric Aircraft Engines, Pratt & Whitney, the Tupolev Design Bureau, and EBP Aircraft LTD worked together as a team to overcome the many technical and cultural challenges. The objective was to obtain large scale inlet data that could be used in the development of a supersonic inlet system for a future High Speed Civil Transport (HSCT). The-first experiment studied the impact of typical inlet structures that have trailing edges in close proximity to the inlet/engine interface plane on the flow characteristics at that plane. The inlet structure simulated the subsonic diffuser of a supersonic inlet using a bifurcated splitter design. The centerbody maximum diameter was designed to permit choking and slightly supercritical operation. The second experiment measured the reflective characteristics of the engine face to incoming perturbations of pressure amplitude. The basic test rig from the first experiment was used with a longer spacer equipped with fast actuated doors. All the objectives set forth at the beginning of the project were met.Document ID19970025571Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsAcosta, Waldo A.*(Army Research Lab. Cleveland, OH United States)*Balser, Jeffrey S.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*McCartney, Timothy P.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Richter, Charles A.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Woike, Mark R.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1997Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-107516AIAA Paper 97-2928E-10820ARL-TR-1390NAS 1.15:107516Meeting InformationMeeting: Joint Propulsion Conference and ExhibitLocation: Seattle, WACountry: United StatesStart Date: July 6, 1997End Date: July 9, 1997Sponsors:American Society for Electrical Engineers,American Society of Mechanical Engineers,American Inst. of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.Accession Number97N25067Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 537-05-22Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970025571.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
폭력�상황이�발생할�가능성을 

인지하고, 피하며, 대응하는�방법에 

대해�고용주가�제공하는�교육에 

반드시�참석해�주십시오.

위협�상황�또는�폭력�행위를�인지한 

경우�다음과�같이�정해진�모든�기존 

정책에�따라�담당�관리자�또는 

감독자에게�반드시�신고해�주십시오.

위협적�또는�폭력적�상황이�발생할 

경우�동료들과�고객들을�살피고 

도와야�합니다.

고객이�위협해�오거나�폭력적이 

될�경우, 고객과�언쟁을�벌이지 

마십시오. 필요할�경우, 안전한 

장소로�이동하십시오(이동하기에 

이상적인�장소는�안에서�잠기고, 

두�번째�출구가�있으며, 전화기�또는 

무음�경보기가�마련된�곳입니다).

감정이�격해져�있거나 

폭력적으로�보이는�사람에게는

COVID-19 예방�정책�또는�기타 

COVID-19 관련�정책이나 

규칙(예: 동거인�또는�식품�수의 

한도)을�따르도록�강제하려고 

하지�마십시오.

CS319744-H 2020년 8월 14일

cdc.gov/coronavirus

감독자

할�일 하지�말아야�할�일

CS319484-H

직장 폭력을 예방하기 위해 

직원들이 기본적으로 할 일과 하지 말아야 할 일
### §230i. Report to Congressional committees

By no later than the end of the first full fiscal year following November 10, 1978, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate, a comprehensive report with recommendations as to sites within the Mississippi River Delta Region which constitute nationally significant examples of natural resources within that region.

(Pub. L. 95–625, title IX, §910, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3538.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs of the House of Representatives changed to Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives on Jan. 5, 1993, by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Third Congress.

#### "Secretary" Defined

Secretary means the Secretary of the Interior, see section 2 of Pub. L. 95–625, set out as a note under section 45f of this title.
EXHIBIT 32









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the quarterly report of New Mexico Software, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned principal executive officer and the principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  May 13, 2010








/s/ Richard F. Govatski


Richard F Govatski, President


(Principal Executive Officer)














/s/ Teresa B. Dickey


Teresa B. Dickey, Treasurer


(Principal Financial Officer)
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the quarterly report of New Mexico Software, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned principal executive officer and the principal financial officer of
the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) 
      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2) 
      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:  May
20, 2009










/s/
Richard F. Govatski


Richard F
Govatski, President


(Principal
Executive Officer)
#### § 10.2 Language of registration statement.

Registration statements must be in English if possible. If in a foreign language they must be accompanied by an English translation certified under oath by the translator, before a notary public or other person authorized by law to administer oaths for general purposes as a true and adequate translation. The statements, with the exception of signature, must be typewritten if practicable but will be accepted if written legibly in ink.
#### Isaac R. Bennett *v.*William Pierson.

Additional appeal bond. It is within the discretion of the circuit court, on an appeal from a justice of the peace, to require the party appealing to file an additional appeal bond, and it is not error to dismiss his appeal in case of non-compliance with a rule to that effect.

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Morgan county; the Hon. Cyrus Epler, Judge, presiding.

Mr. Oscar A. DeLeuw, for the plaintiff in error. ■

Mr. William A. Crawley, for the defendant in error.

Per Curiam:

This suit was commenced before a justice of the peace, and from the judgment rendered against him defendant prayed and perfected an appeal to the circuit court. At the May term of the circuit court, a rule was laid upon defendant, who was appellant in that court, to give an additional appeal bond by the first day of August next thereafter, and the cause continued to the ensuing August term. Although ample opportunity was afforded for that purpose, the rule to file an additional appeal bond was never complied with. The cause was continued to the ensuing November term, when it was dismissed for non-compliance with the rule. It was within the discretion of the court to require defendant to give an additional appeal bond, and there was no error in dismissing his appeal for a non-compliance with the rule.

No error appearing in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

  <ARTICLE>      5
         
  <S>                                             <C>
  <PERIOD-TYPE>                                   YEAR
  <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               SEP-30-1998
  <PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1998
  <CASH>                                          194792
  <SECURITIES>                                         0
  <RECEIVABLES>                                   116543
  <ALLOWANCES>                                         0
  <INVENTORY>                                          0
  <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                321354
  <PP&E>                                           42008
  <DEPRECIATION>                                   25964
  <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  339248
  <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            46896
  <BONDS>                                              0
  <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
  <PREFERRED>                                     243331
  <COMMON>                                          9766
  <OTHER-SE>                                           0
  <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    339248
  <SALES>                                              0
  <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                628518
  <CGS>                                                0
  <TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
  <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                572744
  <LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
  <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
  <INCOME-PRETAX>                                  45332
  <INCOME-TAX>                                         0
  <INCOME-CONTINUING>                              45332
  <DISCONTINUED>                                       0
  <EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
  <CHANGES>                                            0
  <NET-INCOME>                                     45332
  <EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
  <EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05
          
  
  
</TABLE>
4 / 8 / 1 3 I n d e x o f / E m i s I n v

e n t o r y /2 0 0 7v 5

f t p : / / f t p . e p a . g o v / E m i s I n v e n t o r y /2 0 0 7v 5 1 / 1 

# I n d e x o f / E m i s I n v e n t o r y

/ 2 0 0 7 v 5 N a m e S i z e D a t e M o d

i f i e d [ p ar e n t d i r e c to r y ] 2 0 0 7 e m i s / 4 / 8 / 1 3 1 1 : 5 9 : 0 0 A M 2 0 0 7 p l a t f o r m _ c o u n t y _ s e c to r _ e m i s s i o n s _ 2 0 0 7 r e _ 2 0 2 0 r e . z

i p 1 . 1 M B 3 / 1 9 / 1 3 4 : 3 4 : 0 0 P M 2 0 0 7 p l a t f o r m _ s t at e _ s e c to r

_ s u m m ari e s _ 3 0 n o v 1 2

_ r e v . x l s x 1 8 3 k B 1 2 / 1 3 / 1 2 1 2 : 5 2 : 0 0 P M 2 0 2 0 r e / 1 2 / 1 3 / 1 2 1 1 : 3 2 : 0 0 A M 2 0 2 0 r e _ c tl 2 / 4 / 8 / 1 3 1 1 : 5 9 : 0 0 A M R E A D M E

_ p m _ n a a q s _ 2 0 0 7 e e _ 2 0 0 7 r e _ 2 0 2 0 r e . t

x t 1 5 . 6 k B 1 2 / 5 / 1 2 1 : 0 8 : 0 0 P M a g g _ 1 2 km _to _ 3 6 km . p y 7 . 9 k B 2 / 1 9 / 1 3 5 : 0 3 : 0 0 P M g e _ d at _ 2 0 0 7 v 5 . t ar . g z 1 . 3 G B 1 2 / 5 / 1 2 1 : 0 8 : 0 0 P M g e _ d at _ 2 0 0 7 v 5

_ c o n t e n t s . t x t 9 8 . 2 k B 1 2 / 5 / 1 2 1 : 0 8 : 0 0 P M s m o k e _ h e l p e r _ s c ri p t s . t ar . g z 3 . 5 M B 1 2 / 5 / 1 2 1 : 0 8 : 0 0 P M
{"@context": "https://wayback.archive-it.org/16698/20220503143118/http://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "item": {"@id": "https:\/\/wayback.archive-it.org\/16698\/20220503143118\/http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/NIOSHSafetyVideos", "name": "NIOSH"}}]}

















© 2022 Google LLC
§ 570.45 Violation of escorted trip. ( a ) Staff shall process as an escapee an inmate who absconds from an escorted trip.
( b ) Staff may take disciplinary action against an inmate who fails to comply with any of the conditions of the escorted trip.