alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 94.113 Use of volunteers, community efforts, compensation assistance. ( a ) *Mandated use of volunteers; waiver.* Programs shall use volunteers, to the extent required by the SAA, in order to be eligible for VOCA funds. The chief executive of the State, who may act through the SAA, may waive this requirement, provided that the program submits written documentation of its efforts to recruit and maintain volunteers, or otherwise demonstrate why circumstances prohibit the use of volunteers, to the satisfaction of the chief executive.
( b ) *Waiver of use of volunteers.* SAAs shall maintain documentation supporting any waiver granted under VOCA, at 34 U.S.C. 20103(b)(1)(C), relating to the use of volunteers by programs.
( c ) *Promotion of community efforts to aid crime victims.* Community served coordinated public and private efforts to aid crime victims may include, but are not limited to, serving on federal, State, local, or tribal work groups to oversee and recommend improvements to community responses to crime victims, and developing written agreements and protocols for such responses.
( d ) *Assistance to victims in applying for compensation.* Assistance to potential recipients of crime victim compensation benefits (including potential recipients who are victims of federal crime) in applying for such benefits may include, but are not limited to, referring such potential recipients to an organization that can so assist, identifying crime victims and advising them of the availability of such benefits, assisting such potential recipients with application forms and procedures, obtaining necessary documentation, monitoring claim status, and intervening on behalf of such potential recipients with the crime victims' compensation program.
[81 FR 44528, July 8, 2016, as amended at 88 FR 3657, Jan. 20, 2023]
- 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

AF 09-0688 

MAR 0 8 2022 

IN RE THE RULES OF PROFESSIONAL 

CONDUCT 

Bowen Greenwood Clork of Supreme Court O R D E R Stati= Of Montana 

At the request of the Montana Legal Services Association (MLSA), and in 

recognition of MLSA's desire to continue and expand the Montana Eviction Intervention 

Program to assist clients facing eviction, we issue the following Order to clarify 

M. R. Pro. Cond. 1.8(e). Our interpretation of Rule 1.8(e), which prohibits lawyers from 

providing financial assistance to a client in connection with pending or contemplated 

litigation, except in specific circumstances, also includes the following: 

When a non-profit organization providing free legal aid to indigent clients 

has received donations or other funding to provide humanitarian aid to 

persons in need, such as financial assistance to pay for housing, food, 

clothing, shelter, or transportation, the organization's use of such donation 

or other funding to provide humanitarian aid to its clients or clients' families 

shall not be deemed a violation of M. R. Pro. Cond. 1.8(e). 

IT IS ORDERED that this clarification shall take effect immediately and shall 

remain in effect until further order of this Court. 

This Order shall be posted on the Court's website. In addition, the Clerk is directed 

to provide copies of this Order and the attachment to the State Law Library, to Todd Everts, 

Shana Harrington, and Karl Krempel at Montana Legislative Services, to Bethany Ahrens 

and the Thomson Reuters Rules department at Thomson Reuters, to Patti Glueckert and 

the Statute Legislation department at LexisNexis, and to the State Bar of Montana, with 

the request that the State Bar provide notice of this clarification on its website and in the 

next available issue of ‘ tK.., Montana Lawyer. 

DATED this day of March, 2022. 

Chief Justice 

03/09/2022

Case Number: AF 09-0688
L,66 7/1-4r-0-3 4

nif 

Justices
Editorial Note on Part 645
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 645 appear at 65 FR 70311, Nov. 22, 2000.

§ 645.115 Construction. ( a ) Part 635, subpart B, of this title, Force Account Construction (justification required for force account work), states that it is cost-effective for certain utility adjustments to be performed by a utility with its own forces and equipment, provided the utility is qualified to perform the work in a satisfactory manner. This cost-effectiveness finding covers minor work on the utility's existing facilities routinely performed by the utility with its own forces. When the utility is not adequately staffed and equipped to perform such work with its own forces and equipment at a time convenient to and in coordination with the associated highway construction, such work may be done by: ( 1 ) A contract awarded by the TD or utility to the lowest qualified bidder based on appropriate solicitation,
( 2 ) Inclusion as part of the TD's highway construction contract let by the TD as agreed to by the utility,
( 3 ) An existing continuing contract, provided the costs are reasonable, or
( 4 ) A contract for low-cost incidental work, such as tree trimming and the like, awarded by the TD or utility without competitive bidding, provided the costs are reasonable.
( b ) When it has been determined under part 635, subpart B, that the force account method is not the most cost-effective means for accomplishing the utility adjustment, such work is to be done under competitive bid contracts as described in § 645.115(a) (1) and (2) or under an existing continuing contract provided it can be demonstrated this is the most cost-effective method.
( c ) Costs for labor, materials, equipment, and other services furnished by the utility shall be billed by the utility directly to the TD. The special provisions of contracts let by the utility or the TD shall be explicit in this respect. The costs of force account work performed for the utility by the TD and of contract work performed for the utility under a contract let by the TD shall be reported separately from the costs of other force account and contract items on the highway project.
#### § 655.602 Definitions.

The terms used herein are defined in accordance with definitions and usages contained in the MUTCD and 23 U.S.C. 101(a).
#### § 551.111 Marriage.

A pretrial inmate may request permission to marry in accordance with current Bureau of Prisons policy for convicted inmates. Staff shall contact the court, U.S. Attorney, U.S. Marshals Service, and in the case of an alien, the Immigration and Naturalization Service, to advise of the marriage request of the pretrial inmate and to request their comments.
### §404b–1. Exclusion of Great Onyx and Crystal Caves

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized, in his discretion, to exclude the Great Onyx Cave and the Crystal Cave, or either of them, from the maximum boundaries of the said park, and the area required for general development of the said park by section 404b of this title, is modified accordingly.

(Aug. 28, 1937, ch. 873, §2, 50 Stat. 871.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Eventual Acquisition of Great Onyx and Crystal Caves

Eventual acquisition of Great Onyx and Crystal Caves, see section 404b–2 of this title.
#### § 79.60 Scope of subpart.

The regulations in this subpart define the eligibility criteria for compensation under section 5 of the Act pertaining to uranium or vanadium-uranium ore transporters and the nature of evidence that will be accepted as proof that a claimant satisfies such eligibility criteria. Section 5 of the Act provides for a payment of $100,000 to persons who contracted lung cancer, one of a limited number of nonmalignant respiratory diseases, renal cancer, or chronic renal disease, following employment for at least one year as a transporter of uranium ore or vanadium-uranium ore from a uranium mine or uranium mill located in a specified state during the period beginning January 1, 1942, and ending December 31, 1971.
### §3454. Powers of the Secretary

#### (a) In general

In carrying out this subchapter, the Secretary may—

(1) provide technical assistance to any council to assist in developing and implementing an area plan for a designated area;

(2) cooperate with other departments and agencies of the Federal Government, States, local units of government, local Indian tribes, and local nonprofit organizations in conducting surveys and inventories, disseminating information, and developing area plans;

(3) assist in carrying out an area plan approved by the Secretary for any designated area by providing technical assistance and financial assistance to any council; and

(4) enter into agreements with councils in accordance with section 3455 of this title.

#### (b) Coordinator

#### (1) In general

To improve the provision of technical assistance to councils under this subchapter, the Secretary shall designate for each council an individual to be the coordinator for the council.

#### (2) Responsibility

A coordinator for a council shall be directly responsible for the provision of technical assistance to the council.

(Pub. L. 97–98, title XV, §1531, as added Pub. L. 107–171, title II, §2504, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 272; amended Pub. L. 110–234, title II, §2805(c), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1088; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title II, §2805(c), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1816.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 made identical amendments to this section. The amendments by Pub. L. 110–234 were repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3454, Pub. L. 97–98, title XV, §1531, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1339, related to selection of designated areas for assistance, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 107–171.

#### Amendments

2008—Pub. L. 110–246, §2805(c), designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, and added subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2008 Amendment

Amendment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as an Effective Date note under section 8701 of Title 7, Agriculture.
#### John Turco, an Infant, by Donato Turco, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Atlantic Macaroni Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ.
### §450ss–1. Definitions

In sections 450ss to 450ss–7 of this title:

#### (1) Foundation

The term "Foundation" means the Oklahoma City National Memorial Foundation, a not-for-profit corporation that is—

(A) described in section 501(c)(3) of title 26;

(B) exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of such title; and

(C) dedicated to the support of the Memorial.

#### (2) Memorial

The term "Memorial" means the Oklahoma City National Memorial designated under section 450ss–2(a) of this title.

#### (3) Secretary

The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of the Interior.

#### (4) Trust

The term "Trust" means the Oklahoma City National Memorial Trust.

(Pub. L. 105–58, §3, Oct. 9, 1997, 111 Stat. 1262; Pub. L. 108–199, div. F, title V, §544(b), Jan. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 347.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2004—Pub. L. 108–199 added par. (1), redesignated former pars. (1) to (3) as pars. (2) to (4), respectively, and struck out "designated under section 450ss–3(a) of this title" before the period in par. (4).
2019-2020 Flu Season: Burden and Burden Averted by Vaccination

During the 2019-2020 season, CDC estimates flu caused: 

38

million

flu illnesses

400,000

flu hospitalizations

22,000

flu deaths

It could have been even worse without f lu vaccines.

Nearly 52% of the U.S. population 6 months and older got a flu vaccine during the 2019-2020 

flu season, and this prevented an estimated:

7.5

million

flu illnesses

get vaccinated www.cdc.gov/flu

105,000

hospitalizations

6,300

deaths

Imagine the impact if more Americans chose to get a f lu vaccine.

Many more f lu illnesses, f lu hospitalizations, and f lu deaths could be prevented. 

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/index.html

Enough people to fill 

Michigan Stadium at the

 University of Michigan

More than the combined 

population of Kentucky and 

Kansas

Equivalent to saving about 

17 lives per day over the 

course of a year

The estimates for the 2019-2020 influenza season are preliminary pending additional data from the season.

September 2020
###### Editorial Note on Part 0

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

#### § 0.96a Interstate Agreement on Detainers.

The Director of the Bureau of Prisons is designated as the U.S. Officer under Article VII of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (84 Stat. 1402).

[Order No. 462-71, 36 FR 12212, June 29, 1971]
Editorial Note on Part 635
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 635 appear at 67 FR 75924, Dec. 10, 2002.

§ 635.111 Tied bids. ( a ) The State DOT may tie or permit the tying of Federal-aid highway projects or Federal-aid and State-financed highway projects for bidding purposes where it appears that by so doing more favorable bids may be received. To avoid discrimination against contractors desiring to bid upon a lesser amount of work than that included in the tied combinations, provisions should be made to permit bidding separately on the individual projects whenever they are of such character as to be suitable for bidding independently.
( b ) When Federal-aid and State-financed highway projects are tied or permitted to be tied together for bidding purposes, the bid schedule shall set forth the quantities separately for the Federal-aid work and the State-financed work. All proposals submitted for the tied projects must contain separate bid prices for each project individually. Federal participation in the cost of the work shall be on the basis of the lowest overall responsive bid proposal unless the analysis of bids reveals that mathematical unbalancing has caused an unsupported shift of cost liability to the Federal-aid work. If such a finding is made, Federal participation shall be based on the unit prices represented in the proposal by the individual contractor who would be the lowest responsive and responsible bidder if only the Federal-aid project were considered.
( c ) Federal-aid highway projects and State-financed highway projects may be combined in one contract if the conditions of the projects are so similar that the unit costs on the Federal-aid projects should not be increased by such combinations of projects. In such cases, like quantities should be combined in the proposal to avoid the possibility of unbalancing of bids in favor of either of the projects in the combination.
### §446. Sites for tablets at Antietam; care and supervision

All lands acquired by the United States, whether by purchase, gift, or otherwise, for the purposes of sites for tablets for the marking of the lines of battle of the Army of the Potomac and of the Army of Northern Virginia at Antietam, and of the position of each of the forty-three different commands of the Regular Army engaged in the battle of Antietam, shall be under the care and supervision of the Secretary of the Interior.

(Aug. 30, 1890, ch. 837, §1, 26 Stat. 401; Ex. Ord. No. 6166, §2, June 10, 1933; Ex. Ord. No. 6228, §1, July 28, 1933.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Administrative functions of certain national military parks transferred to Department of the Interior by Ex. Ord. Nos. 6166 and 6228, set out in notes under section 901 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

National Park Service substituted for Office of National Parks, Buildings, and Reservations referred to in Ex. Ord. No. 6166, by act Mar. 2, 1934, ch. 38, §1, 48 Stat. 389.
Editorial Note on Part 0
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

§ 0.190 Changes within organizational units. ( a ) The head of each Office, Board, Division or Bureau may from time to time propose the establishment, transfer, reorganization or termination of major functions within his organizational unit as he may deem necessary or appropriate. In each instance, the head of the Office, Board, Division or Bureau shall submit the proposed change in writing to the Assistant Attorney General for Administration. The Assistant Attorney General for Administration shall evaluate the proposal and shall submit the proposed change, along with his recommendation, to the Associate Attorney when appropriate, and in all other cases directly to the Deputy Attorney General. Where the Associate Attorney General has received a proposed change, he shall evaluate it, and shall submit it along, with his recommendation, to the Deputy Attorney General. The Deputy Attorney General shall then approve or disapprove the change.
( b ) The approval shall be final in the case of changes which do not affect the overall structure of the Department. Proposed changes which are determined by the Deputy Attorney General to affect the overall structure of the Department's organization shall be forwarded by the Deputy Attorney General to the Attorney General for final approval prior to implementation, and shall be effectuated by issuance of an Attorney General's order, in accordance with subpart AA of this part.
[Order No. 960-81, 46 FR 52354, Oct. 27, 1981]
#### § 551.90 Policy.

Bureau staff shall not discriminate against inmates on the basis of race, religion, national origin, sex, disability, or political belief. This includes the making of administrative decisions and providing access to work, housing and programs.

[63 FR 55774, Oct. 16, 1998]
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 1131

_____________________________ A.G., A Child
, Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Robert E. Long Jr. , Judge

. November 14, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , R AY , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Jasmine Russell, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahas see , for Appellee.
### §404c. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act May 25, 1926, ch. 382, §4, 44 Stat. 636, authorized the Secretary of the Interior to employ, for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of sections 404 to 404b of this title, the commission authorized by act Feb. 21, 1925, ch. 281, 43 Stat. 958 (a temporary act).
§ 27.9 Authority of the Director to review and decide claims of a breach of a settlement agreement. ( a ) Any party to a settlement agreement reached in proceedings and in a forum under this part may file a claim of a breach of that settlement agreement with the Director within 30 days of the date on which the grounds for the claim of breach were known or should have been known.
( b ) The Director shall adjudicate any timely claim of a breach of a settlement agreement. The Director shall exercise the authority granted under § 27.4(e)(4) to ensure the efficient administration and management of the adjudication of the breach claim, pursuant to any procedures the Director deems reasonably necessary to carry out the functions assigned under this paragraph.
( c ) A party may request, within 30 calendar days of a decision on a claim of a breach of a settlement agreement by the Director, review of that decision by the Deputy Attorney General.
[89 FR 7286, Feb. 2, 2024]
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Norfolk Division

In re:

TROY ANTHONY EATON, SR., and Case No.: 15-71583-SCS

APRIL JULY EATON, Chapter 7

Debtors.

_____________________________

LAWRENCE H. GLANZER, TRUSTEE,

Plaintiff,

vs. APN: 15-7067-SCS

TROY ANTHONY EATON, SR., and

APRIL JULY EATON,

Defendants.

NOTICE OF MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY

TAKE NOTICE that, on November 3, 2015, Lawrence H. Glanzer, Chapter 7 trustee (“Trustee”)

of the estate of Troy Anthony Eaton, Sr. and April July Eaton (the “Debtors”), filed a Motion to Compel 

Discovery (the “Motion”). A copy of the Motion is being filed and served together with this Notice.

Your rights may be affected. You should read the Motion carefully and discuss it with your 

attorney, if you have one. (If you do not have an attorney, you may wish to consult one.)

If you do not want the Court to grant the relief requested in the Motion, then you or your attorney 

must attend a hearing to be scheduled at a later date. You will receive a separate notice of hearing. 

Under Local Rule 9013-1, unless a written objection to the Motion is filed with and received by

the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, United States Courthouse, 600 Granby Street, 

Room 400, Norfolk, VA 23510, and received by the Trustee at the address set forth below, on or before 

seven (7) business days before the scheduled hearing date, the Court may deem any opposition 

waived, treat the Motion as conceded, and enter an order granting the requested relief without further 

notice or hearing.

Dated: November 3, 2015

/s/ Lawrence H. Glanzer, Trustee

Lawrence H. Glanzer, Trustee

580 East Main Street, Suite 300

Norfolk, VA 23510

757-622-9005 (voice); 757-624-9257 (fax)

Email: trustee@rgblawfirm.com

Case 15-07067-SCS Doc 14 Filed 11/03/15 Entered 11/03/15 12:12:16 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that on November 3, 2015, I will cause the foregoing pleading to be filed via the Court’s 

CM/ECF system, which will thereupon send notice of electronic filing thereof to all registered 

participants associated with this adversary proceeding, thereby completing service upon them.

/s/ Lawrence H. Glanzer, Trustee

Lawrence H. Glanzer, Trustee

2

Case 15-07067-SCS Doc 14 Filed 11/03/15 Entered 11/03/15 12:12:16 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Angela Carter v. Tarantino Properties, Inc.

Appellate case number: 01-17-00843-CV

Trial court case number: 2015-57423

Trial court: 215th District Court of Harris County

The record was due on December 18, 2017. On January 8, 2018, the court reporter 

advised this court that no reporter’s record was taken. On January 24, 2018, the district clerk 

advised this court that appellant had not made payment arrangements for the filing of the clerk’s 

record. 

On November 13, 2017, appellant filed in this court a statement of inability to afford 

costs on appeal. Appellant stated in the cover letter that she had filed this document in the trial 

court; but because we are unable to verify that the trial court received this document.

Accordingly, if appellant wishes to proceed without payment of costs or fees for 

preparation of the appellate record, she must comply with Rule 145(b) of the rules of civil 

procedure. Appellant must file her Statement of Inability in compliance with Rule 145 in the trial 

court. Appellant also must ask the trial court clerk to prepare and file a supplemental clerk’s 

record within 14 days of the date of this order, containing the Statement of Inability appellant 

filed with the trial court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c).

If appellant fails to comply with this order, the case may be dismissed for failure to make 

arrangements for the filing of the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal 

of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s fault).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: __/s/ Michael Massengale_

  Acting individually 

Date: _February 22, 2018_