alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

Washington, D.C. 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 93007 / September 15, 2021

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension of trading 

in the securities of the following issuer, commencing at 9:30 a.m. EST on September 16, 2021, 

and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EST on September 29, 2021:

 Consumer Capital Group, Inc. (CCGN)

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of the foregoing company due 

to a lack of current and accurate information about the company because it has not filed certain 

periodic reports with the Commission. This order was entered pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act).

The Commission cautions brokers, dealers, shareholders and prospective purchasers that they 

should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available 

information and any information subsequently issued by this company.

Brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11, at 

the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered relating to the securities 

of the subject company unless and until the broker or dealer has strictly complied with all of the 

provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is required by the rule, it 

should refrain from entering quotations relating to the securities of this company that has been 

subject to a trading suspension until such time as it has familiarized itself with the rule and is 

certain that all of its provisions have been met. Any broker or dealer with questions regarding

the rule should contact the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, DC 

at (202) 551-5777. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation which is in violation of the rule,

the Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement action. 

If any broker, dealer or other person has any information which may relate to this matter, they 

should immediately communicate it to the Delinquent Filings Branch of the Division of 

Enforcement at (202) 551-5466, or by e-mail at DelinquentFilings@sec.gov.
(No. 83-CC-1879

#### *In re*Application of Kimberly Sobbe.

*Opinion filed April 25, 1983.*

Kimberly Sobbe, *pro se,*for Claimant.

Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General (Kathleen O’Brien, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.

*927Roe, C. J.

Claimant seeks an award pursuant to the provisions of the Law Enforcement Officers and Firemen Compensation Act. Ill.Rev.Stat. 1981, ch. 48, par. 281 *et seq.*

The Court has reviewed Claimant’s application for benefits together with the written statement of decedent’s supervisor and has also reviewed the medical examiner’s certificate of death, the designation of beneficiary and the report of the Attorney General. From its consideration of these documents the Court finds:

1. A claim was filed herein by Kimberly Sobbe, widow of Kenneth J. Sobbe, who died on January 21, 1983, while on duty as a firefighter for the New Lenox Fire Protection District.

2. Kimberly Sobbe is entitled to any award authorized by this Court as beneficiary designated by the decedent, Kenneth J. Sobbe.

3. The decedent was on duty on the date of his death and was riding on a fire tanker which was involved in a traffic accident while responding to a call to the scene of a fire. Decedent was taken to a hospital where he was pronounced dead.

4. The medical examiner’s certificate of death lists the cause of death as extreme multiple injuries.

5. There is nothing in the circumstances to suggest that decedent’s death resulted from the wilful misconduct or intoxication of the decedent.

6. The facts as herein reported are in compliance with the requirements of the Law Enforcement Officers and Firemen Compensation Act. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 48, par. 281 *et seq.*

By reason of the foregoing, it is hereby ordered that *928an award of $20,000.00 be, and is hereby made to Kimberly Sobbe, as designated beneficiary of Kenneth J. Sobbe, as is required by the provisions of the Law Enforcement Officers and Firemen Compensation Act, Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 48, par. 281 *et seq.*
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-4028

_____________________________

HERSHEL WALKER,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.

June 21, 2019

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. 

LEWIS, OSTERHAUS, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Hershel Walker, pro se, Petitioner.

Eric Salvatore Giunta, Assistant General Counsel, Department of 

Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 51 (Wednesday, March 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 14426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6048]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

[2280-665]


National Register of Historic Places; Notification of Pending 
Nominations and Related Actions

    Nominations for the following properties being considered for 
listing or related actions in the National Register were received by 
the National Park Service before February 19, 2011. Pursuant to 
sections 60.13 or 60.15 of 36 CFR part 60, written comments are being 
accepted concerning the significance of the nominated properties under 
the National Register criteria for evaluation. Comments may be 
forwarded by United States Postal Service, to the National Register of 
Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C St. NW., MS 2280, 
Washington, DC 20240; by all other carriers, National Register of 
Historic Places, National Park Service,1201 Eye St., NW., 8th floor, 
Washington, DC 20005; or by fax, 202-371-6447. Written or faxed 
comments should be submitted by March 31, 2011.
    Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or 
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be 
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying 
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can 
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying 
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be 
able to do so.

J. Paul Loether,
Chief, National Register of Historic Places/National, Historic 
Landmarks Program.

ARIZONA

Maricopa County

Wickenburg, Henry, Pioneer Cemetery, Adams St, Wickenburg, 11000151

CALIFORNIA

Placer County

Auburn Public Library, (Auburn, CA MPS) 175 Almond St, Auburn, 
11000153

OREGON

Washington County

Walker Naylor Historic District, Gayles Way, Covey Run Dr, A St, and 
21st Ave, Forest Grove, 11000155

WASHINGTON

Yakima County

Young, Fred and Elizabeth, House, 804 S 22nd Ave, Yakima, 11000150

WISCONSIN

Barron County

St. Mary's Rectory, 1575 Second Ave, Cumberland, 11000152

    OTHER ACTIONS: Request for REMOVAL has been made for the 
following resource.

WISCONSIN

Orange County

1890 Windermere School, 113 W Seventh Ave, Windermere, 03000509

[FR Doc. 2011-6048 Filed 3-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-51-P
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00541-CR

William Buckner Hubble

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 235th District Court

of Cooke County (07-256)

December 23, 2014

Opinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By __/s/ Sue Walker___________________

 Justice Sue Walker
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

In the Matter of ] 

 ] 

 FLOORING SOLUTIONS, INC. ] CASE NO. 16-12380-BFK 

 ] Chapter 7 

 Debtor ] 

RESPONSE BY SONABANK TO TRUSTEE’S MOTION 

TO EMPLOY KEVIN M. O’DONNELL AS COUNSEL 

 SONABANK, by and through undersigned counsel, responds to the Chapter 7 

Trustee’s Motion to employ Kevin M. O’Donnell, Esq as her counsel as follows: 

1. Kevin M. O’Donnell did represent Sonabank in this case for the purpose 

of filing a Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay (Docket #18). 

2. The Motion was granted by this Court (Docket #32). 

3. Mr. O’Donnell subsequently withdrew as counsel for Sonabank, with the 

Bank’s consent. 

4. Sonabank has no objection to the employment of Mr. O’Donnell or his 

firm, Henry & O’Donnell, PC as counsel for the Chapter 7 trustee in this case. 

5. The Bank is represented now by counsel who is unaffiliated with Mr. 

O’Donnell or his firm, Henry & O’Donnell, PC. 

Respectfully submitted: 

SONABANK 

By Counsel 

Case 16-12380-BFK Doc 89 Filed 08/15/16 Entered 08/15/16 10:34:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
/S/ Madeline A. Trainor 

_____________________________ 

Madeline A. Trainor, VSB#18531 

REDMON, PEYTON & BRASWELL, LLP 

510 King Street, Suite 301 

Alexandria, Virginia 22314 

703-684-2000 

703-684-5109 (Fax) 

mtrainor@rpb-law.com

Certificate of Service

 I hereby certify that I have this 15th day of August, 2016, mailed, first class 

postage prepaid, a true copy of the foregoing Response to: 

Whitney Lawrimore Hughes, Esquire 

Thomas K. Plofchan, Jr., Esquire 

Westlake Legal Group 

46175 Westlake Drive, #320 

Sterling, VA 20165 

Counsel for Debtor 

Kevin M. O’Donnell, Esquire 

HENRY & O’DONNELL, PC 

300 N. Washington Street, Suite 204 

Alexandria, Virginia 22314 

kmo@henrylaw.com

Klinette Kindred, Esquire 

TYLER, BARTL, RAMSDELL & COUNTS, PLLC 

300 N. Washington Street, Suite 200 

Alexandria, Virginia 22314 

kkindred@tbrclaw.com

Jack Frankel, Esquire 

Office of the United States Trustee 

110 South Union Street 

Alexandria, Virginia 223214 

Jack.I.Frankel@usdoj.gov

 /S/ Madeline A. Trainor

 Madeline A. Trainor 

Case 16-12380-BFK Doc 89 Filed 08/15/16 Entered 08/15/16 10:34:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

RDM, LLC, 

Complainant, 

TED STEVENS ANCHORAGE 

INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, 

Respondent. 

cz> 

Docket No. 16^09-14 ;• 

AFFIDAVIT OF JOHN PARROTT, AAE ^ 

STATE OF ALASKA ) 

) ss. 

THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT ) 

John Parrott, AAE being first duly swom deposes and says: 

1. I am the Airport Manager, for Ted Stevens Anchorage International 

Airport ("the Airport"), and make this affidavit based on my personal knowledge. 

2. It is my recollection that the Airport met with Debenham 

Properties/RDM, LLC ("RDM") on October 14, 2008, October 28, 2008, and on 

November 17, 2008 and to the best of my knowledge and recollection I never 

understood them to ask whether the state would be willing to take title in the way the 

Airport took title to the Alaska CargoPort, LLC ("Cargo Port") project in order to allow 

more favorable financing. 

3. The transaction with Cargo Port was merely to accept title after the 

facility was built, at no cost to the Airport, and without undertaking any liability for the 

bonds. Because the Airport took title to the Cargo Port project, we understood that 

Cargo Port, through the Alaska Industrial Development Export Authority ("AIDEA") 

could bond the project as a government owned facility. The Airport bears no liability at 

Affidavit of John Parrott, AAE ^^ C - 0055 Page l of 2 

RDM, LLC V. ANC Docket No. 16-09-14 
any time for bond payments which are secured solely by Cargo Port's sublease revenues 

and not by an interest in the facility itself. 

4. To the best of my knowledge and recollection, neither AGLAD nor 

RDM ever inquired whether the Airport would accept title to their project to facilitate its 

inner. 

i fNOTAJRYl 

%^^ OF f^^^ 

"'^'""^^IJBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this ^9 ^ day of December, 

2009, at Anchorage, Alaska. 

(^UaJ 

Notary Public in and for Alaska 

My Commission Expires: " Co'1-4-A o-f4,(_r 

ANC - 0056 

Affidavit of John Parrott, AAE Page 2 of 2 

RDM, LLC V. ANC Docket No. 16-09-14
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000046043
<NAME>                        Harvey Electronics, Inc.

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-30-1999
<CASH>                                         23,947
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  474,057
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (25,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    4,920,614
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,814,010
<PP&E>                                         2,643,813
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (717,272)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9,744,687
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,888,813
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    402,037
<COMMON>                                       32,828
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,604,662
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9,744,687
<SALES>                                        21,386,507
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               21,459,031
<CGS>                                          13,082,163
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  9,043,046
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             179,341
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (845,519)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (845,519)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (845,519)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.28)



</TABLE>
### §460nnn–91. Wildlands Juniper Management Area

#### (a) Establishment

To further the purposes of section 460nnn–23(c) of this title, the Secretary shall establish a special management area consisting of certain Federal lands in the Cooperative Management and Protection Area, as depicted on the map referred to in section 460nnn–11(a) of this title, which shall be known as the Wildlands Juniper Management Area.

#### (b) Management

Special management practices shall be adopted for the Wildlands Juniper Management Area for the purposes of experimentation, education, interpretation, and demonstration of active and passive management intended to restore the historic fire regime and native vegetation communities on Steens Mountain.

#### (c) Authorization of appropriations

In addition to the authorization of appropriations in section 460nnn–121 of this title, there is authorized to be appropriated $5,000,000 to carry out this part and section 460nnn–23(c) of this title regarding juniper management in the Cooperative Management and Protection Area.

(Pub. L. 106–399, title V, §501, Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1670.)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 99464 / February 5, 2024

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-20162

In the Matter of

BlueCrest Capital Management 

Limited,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER DIRECTING 

DISBURSEMENT OF FAIR FUND

On November 2, 2021, the Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority, published a Notice 

of Proposed Plan of Distribution and Opportunity for Comment (“Notice”),1pursuant to Rule 

1103 of the Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans (“Commission’s 

Rules”);2and simultaneously posted the Proposed Plan of Distribution (the “Proposed Plan”). 

The Notice advised interested persons that they could obtain a copy of the Proposed Plan from 

the Commission’s public website or by submitting a written request to Catherine E. Pappas, 

United States Securities and Exchange Commission, One Penn Center, 1617 JFK Blvd., Ste. 520, 

Philadelphia, PA 19103. The Notice also advised that all persons desiring to comment on the 

Proposed Plan could submit their comments, in writing, within 30 days of the Notice. The 

Commission received six comments on the Proposed Plan during the comment period. On 

February 18, 2022, after review and consideration, the Commission issued an order approving 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 93508 (Nov. 2, 2021).

2

 17 C.F.R. § 201.1103.
2

the Proposed Plan without modification,3and posted the approved Plan of Distribution (the 

“Plan”). 

The Plan provides for the distribution of the Fair Fund, plus accumulated interest, less 

taxes, fees, and expenses, to compensate U.S. investors for management fees paid to the 

Respondent in connection with BlueCrest Capital International Master Fund Limited’s two 

unregistered feeder funds, BlueCrest Capital International Limited and BlueCrest Capital L.P., 

between October 1, 2011 and December 31, 2015, inclusive. 

Pursuant to the Plan, the Fund Administrator has submitted a payment file to Commission 

staff with a reasonable assurances letter as to the completeness and accuracy of the information 

included in that payment file. The Commission staff has reviewed and accepted the payment file 

and requests, pursuant to Rule 1101(b)(6) of the Commission’s Rules, 17 C.F.R. 

§ 201.1101(b)(6), that the Commission authorize the transfer of $158,749,328.78 from the Fair 

Fund to the Fair Fund’s escrow account at The Huntington National Bank for distribution by the 

Fund Administrator in accordance with the Plan.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, that Commission staff shall transfer 

$158,749,328.78 from the Fair Fund to the Fair Fund’s escrow account at The Huntington 

National Bank, N.A., for distribution by the Fund Administrator in accordance with the Plan. 

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.4

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

3

 See Corrected Order Approving Plan of Distribution, Exchange Act Rel. No. 94285 (Feb. 18, 2022).

4

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(v).
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 4.1

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                     RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

   Mercury Interactive Corporation, a corporation organized and existing under
and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,

   DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

   FIRST: That at a meeting of the Board of Directors of Mercury Interactive
Corporation, resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment
of the Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation, declaring said
amendment to be advisable and calling a meeting of the stockholders of said
corporation for consideration thereof. The resolution setting forth the
proposed amendment is as follows:

   RESOLVED: that the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of this corporation
by amended by changing the first paragraph of the Article thereof numbered III
so that, as amended said first paragraph of said Article shall be and read as
follows:

   "This corporation is authorized to issue two classes of stock to be
designated, respectively, "Common Stock" and "Preferred Stock". The total
number of shares which the corporation is authorized to issue is One Hundred
and Twenty-five Million (125,000,000) shares. One Hundred and Twenty Million
(120,000,000) shares shall be Common Stock and Five Million (5,000,000) shares
shall be Preferred Stock, each with a par value of $.002 per share."

   SECOND: That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors, a
meeting of the stockholders of said corporation was duly called and held, upon
notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law of the
state of Delaware at which meeting the necessary number of share as required by
statue were voted in favor of the amendment.

   THIRD: That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

   IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Mercury Interactive Corporation has caused this
certificate to be signed by Amnon Landan, its Chief Executive Officer, and
Sharlene Abrams, its Secretary, this 26th day of May, 1999.

                                                    /s/ Amnon Landan
                                          By: _________________________________
                                                  Chief Executive Officer

         /s/ Sharlene Abrams
Attest: _____________________________
               Secretary
# C_2011152EN.01001001.xml

| 21.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 152/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/10

---

Appeal brought on 7 February 2011 by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 24 November 2010 in Case T-137/09 Nike International v OHIM — Muñoz Molina (R 10)

Nike International v OHIM

Muñoz Molina (R 10)

(Case C-53/11 P)

2011/C 152/17

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Nike International Ltd., Aurelio Muñoz Molina

Other parties to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | That the Court set aside the judgment under appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

That the Court set aside the judgment under appeal.

| — | That the Court deliver a fresh judgment on the substance, rejecting the appeal against the contested decision, or refer the case back to the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

That the Court deliver a fresh judgment on the substance, rejecting the appeal against the contested decision, or refer the case back to the General Court.

| — | That the Court order the applicant [before the General Court] to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

That the Court order the applicant [before the General Court] to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

1.   Infringement of Rule 49 of the CTMIR
   (1)
  and Article 59 of the CTMR
   (2)

Infringement of Rule 49 of the CTMIR

1

and Article 59 of the CTMR

2

The legal basis of the contested decision is Rule 49(1) of the CTMIR, in relation to the current Article 59 of the CTMR. However, the judgment under appeal makes no reference at any point either to Rule 49(1) of the CTMIR or to Article 59 of the CTMR, and makes no ruling on their applicability to the particular case. OHIM considers that that constitutes an error of law and a failure to state sufficient reasons.

2.   Infringement of the OHIM Guidelines and Rule 49(1) of the CTMIR

Infringement of the OHIM Guidelines and Rule 49(1) of the CTMIR

OHIM considers that its Guidelines are not applicable to the particular case. Nevertheless, the judgment under appeal states on two occasions that the Boards of Appeal are obliged to apply the OHIM Guidelines. That constitutes, in OHIM’s opinion, an error of law.

---

(1)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 of 13 December 1995 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark

1

OJ 1995 L 303, p. 1

(2)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark

2

OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1

---
### SUBCHAPTER X—NORTH CASCADES NATIONAL PARK