alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FROM: THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, COUNTY OF LAKE,

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. ALEXANDER RAYMOND COURVILLE, Defendant.

NO. DC-87-86 DECISION

On February 24, 1988, the Defendant was sentenced to Count I, Se 2xual Intercourse without Consent, twenty (20) years; Count II, Aggravated Burglary, twenty (20) years with ten (10) years suspended plus conditions; Counts I and II shall be served consecutively; ten (10) years for persistent felony offender to run consecutive to Counts I and II; 166 days credit for time served; dangerous designation.

On March 9, 1990, the Defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The Defendant was present and was represented by Dave Ohler, of the Montana Defender Project. The state was represented by Larry Nistler, County Attorney from Lake County.

Before hearing the application, the Defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it if such is possible. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he ■understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

After careful consideration, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be amended by changing the wording of the February 24,1988 Judgment. Beginning at page 2, line 1, the Judgment shall read as follows: the sentence imposed above. The Defendant is designated as a persistent felony offender, under MCA 46-18-502, because he committed these felony offenses within five years of his discharge on parole for a prior felony conviction ofRobbeiy

The Sentence Review Division finds that it was harmless error to indicate the discharge was from parole because the defendant had in fact been incarcerated through a period of time within five years of the date of his sentence and therefore, it does constitute a prior felony offender for purposes of the statute.

*18DATED this 9th day of March, 1990.

Judge Boyd and Judge McLean vote to affirm the balance of th 2e sentence in total.

The reason for the amendment was only to clarify the Judgment imposed by the original sentencing judgment.

Hon. Leif B. Erickson

dissents. Judge Erickson would vote to merge the sentence for the Burglary with the sentence for the Sexual Intercourse without Consent, on the basis that they are the result of one act and it is within the policy of the State to do so.

The Honorable Leif B. Erickson, Acting Chairman, dissenting, the Honorable Robert Boyd, Acting Member, The Honorable Ed. McLean, Judges.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of Hawkins, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
period ended March 28, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kathleen P. Pepski, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                                                                           | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|/s/ Kathleen
 P. Pepski                                                                    | 
|                                                                                           | 
|Kathleen P.
 Pepski 
 Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer 
 June 4, 2010

---
#### §§ 42.703-42.709 [Reserved]
§ 94.114 Prohibited discrimination. ( a ) The VOCA non-discrimination provisions specified at 34 U.S.C. 20110(e) shall be implemented in accordance with 28 CFR part 42.
( b ) In complying with VOCA, at 34 U.S.C. 20110(e), as implemented by 28 CFR part 42, SAAs and sub-recipients shall comply with such guidance as may be issued from time to time by the Office for Civil Rights within the Office of Justice Programs.
[81 FR 44528, July 8, 2016, as amended at 88 FR 3657, Jan. 20, 2023]
### §422a. Acceptance of lands

The establishment of the Moores Creek National Battlefield shall be carried forward under the control and direction of the Secretary of the Interior, who is authorized to receive from the State of North Carolina a deed of conveyance to the United States of all the lands belonging to the said State, embracing thirty acres, more or less, and described more particularly in section 422 of this title.

(June 2, 1926, ch. 448, §2, 44 Stat. 685; Ex. Ord. No. 6166, §2, June 10, 1933; Ex. Ord. No. 6228, §1, July 28, 1933; Pub. L. 96–344, §12, Sept. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 1136.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Battlefield" substituted in text for "Military Park" on authority of Pub. L. 96–344, §12, Sept. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 1136, which redesignated Moores Creek National Military Park as Moores Creek National Battlefield.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Administrative functions of Moores Creek National Military Park transferred to Department of the Interior by Ex. Ord. Nos. 6166 and 6228, set out as a note under section 901 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
!

""""#$
$$%&$

'
%	("!)(*

+,
- )"

.-() "!



/0&$00


1
2/0&$00


	

	


	

	







	



3'#-+	#4	
5	'	  
"*)"*").6

 ,$

78

$
 





'35	'7#
	9+3%'#	:	'+#'53:)	 


'#	7##;<:#+%3
% 



:
$88% 



=
  	=
:

-"*)"" ).6



+	#4	
5	'	% 



78

$
 


		

9,
$			 $>$
?8A'#
	&$
>


	&$
?%'#	:$
,)	>'#	:$
,?
'#	7=,
$%3

>'#	%3

?


$B$2$
	&$

'#	:$
,%$>:
$88?%A&
%$,,
B$$$

&$1&$
$
$8C&$
,&&
$$9


DD"*%"((


"!E$8&$,,
B$$,,
$8$$
2,=$



,,,$,$%
 
 8&$
$A
B 
E88&$,,
B$$$	


$>78

$?8$8

$$
8$A
B,,=E$8&$

")*() *
"

Case 15-01126-BFK Doc 18 Filed 12/21/15 Entered 12/21/15 12:12:27 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 6
,,
B$0
$8&$B
$$78

$,&&
$$'&**8$.

'&8
0&,$:&E
$8&$,,
B$$$8C&$
$$


&AB
$
8$
$8$A$&$$$
B
7A"*%

"*$!-(

E$A$$-

"
 +$
B
$



 + 82
B AB$
 & 
 2
B$
	&$
 A$78

$ 




$
2$$$$
<
$A$&$&$8	A&
$
7A

("%"%F,$8B,&&
$$""9


DD*( 
"*-

" +  ,=  $  =B  8    8  $  ,$G  



$>&,,$<AB$
?E

 +

8

	&$



$
2$$$

$

8$8&
+&$
0&
$

B*"E

( +A&
$8H%(
"


$
2$$
$

$BBAB$
8 (+

;
%#=%B
E

 +A&
$8F,

&


$
2$$

8$
B

B8I

$78 (+



;
%#=%B
E

* 	F,

&A
	&$



$
2$$$
8

8$
 &
,= ,,$
$

B "
"!!


$$I
E

  +

8

	&$
8$AB$
&

&
  $$  $
  :  $  $  .A&  "(%  "(

&
$

B"*(
$B
,
,&
$8H!(%

8$A
8$89


0J+&$E

 +

8

	&$
8$AB$
&

&
  $$  $
  :  $  $  .A&  %  "(

&
$

B"*
$B
,
,&
$8H!%

8$A
8$89


0J+&$E

 +$&
8
	&$
GBA&

B
=
E

! +$&
8
	&$
GB&

&
$
E



")*() *
"

Case 15-01126-BFK Doc 18 Filed 12/21/15 Entered 12/21/15 12:12:27 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 6
" + $&
  8
	&$
G ,
 ,,$  $ 8$


#FA$7$$<E

"" H %
$$
G8E


" 	$AB$
&
2
B$
	&$
A$78

$

,&&
$$$<
%8
K&,,
$


(
 +&,,$<AB$
8&$F,$8B,&&
$$""

9


D*(*



 	AB$
8$78

$$

8
'#	:$
,


'#	%3




$
2$$$$
:$$.A&"(%"(
$

B
,
,&
$8H!(%%8$A
8$89


0J+&$%F,$8

B,&&
$$""9


DD*(
 


*
 	AB$
8$78

$$

8
'#	:$
,


'#	%3




$
2$$$$
:$$.A&%"(
$

B
,
,&
$8H!%%8$A
8$89


0J+&$%F,$8

B,&&
$$""9


DD*(
 


 
 +0=,8$<$$,$$8$
$$$

=;$


7$-LLLLLLLLLLLLLLL 

9
$$$
0&,$&B

08$

  KK
   

		


(

")*() *
"

Dec 18 2015 /s/ Brian F. Kenney

Entered on Docket: December 21, 2015

Case 15-01126-BFK Doc 18 Filed 12/21/15 Entered 12/21/15 12:12:27 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 6
	






 !

""""#$
$$%&$

'
%	("!)(*

+,
- )"



/0&$00


1
2/0&$00


	

	


	

	



")*() *
"

Case 15-01126-BFK Doc 18 Filed 12/21/15 Entered 12/21/15 12:12:27 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 6


:&&
$$$;'&%3A$8&
,
$8,1&$$,8$

8B
B,,2=&,

==8$)%,$B,,

$

7A" %"*82-

$	


*(")
	
B$
7=

	
B$
%B
 



;

;;B%:;;

"*

$&$	=
&


.


B$
%7( 

#-A=/)B


-KK    
   

  

&


*

")*() *
"

Case 15-01126-BFK Doc 18 Filed 12/21/15 Entered 12/21/15 12:12:27 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 6
	

$	


*(")
	
B$
7=

	
B$
%B
 



;

;;B%:;;

"*

$&$	=
&


.


B$
%7( 

 

")*() *
"

Case 15-01126-BFK Doc 18 Filed 12/21/15 Entered 12/21/15 12:12:27 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 6
#### § 58.2 Authorization to appoint standing trustees.

Each U.S. Trustee is authorized, subject to the approval of the Deputy Attorney General, or his delegate, to appoint and remove one or more standing trustees to serve in cases under chapters 12 and 13 of title 11, U.S. Code.

[51 FR 44288, Dec. 9, 1986]
From: Simon, Heather  

Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 4:40 PM

To: Dennis McNally

Subject: RE: Request for EPA's AQ Modeling Files from the O3 NAAQS Proposal

Hi Dennis,

That’s correct, there is no pass code.

‐Heather

From: Dennis McNally [mailto:dem@alpinegeophysics.com]  

Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 4:39 PM

To: Simon, Heather

Subject: Re: Request for EPA's AQ Modeling Files from the O3 NAAQS Proposal

Thanks Heather. I take it that the call-in number does not have a pass code? 

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Simon, Heather <Simon.Heather@epa.gov> wrote: 

Great, I sent out a meeting invite for 11am EST on Thursday.  Call-in number: 919-541-4328. 

 

Talk to you then. 

 -Heather 

From: Dennis McNally [mailto:dem@alpinegeophysics.com]  

Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 3:55 PM

To: Simon, Heather

Cc: Possiel, Norm; Gregory Stella

Subject: Re: Request for EPA's AQ Modeling Files from the O3 NAAQS Proposal

 Those times all work. 

 On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Simon, Heather <Simon.Heather@epa.gov> wrote: 

Hi Dennis,

Are you available at one of the following times on Thursday: 10:30 EST, 11:30 EST, or 3:30 EST?

 ‐Heather

From: Dennis McNally [mailto:dem@alpinegeophysics.com]  

Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 2:21 PM

To: Possiel, Norm; Simon, Heather
Cc: Gregory Stella

Subject: Fwd: Request for EPA's AQ Modeling Files from the O3 NAAQS Proposal

 Hi Norm and Heather, 

 Greg Stella asked me to make contact and to dicuss the data transfer. We will be working 

together with the data and I have more availability this week. 

 I am available for a call on either Thursday or Friday this week. Pick a time that works for you. 

 Thanks so much, 

Dennis 

 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- 

From: Gregory Stella <gms@alpinegeophysics.com> 

Date: Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:04 AM 

Subject: Fwd: Request for EPA's AQ Modeling Files from the O3 NAAQS Proposal 

To: Dennis McNally <dem@alpinegeophysics.com> 

Dennis, 

Would you mind following up with Norm and Heather? Ultimately I'd need to get you involved 

anyway. 

Thanks, 

Greg 

-------- Forwarded Message -------- 

Subject: Request for EPA's AQ Modeling Files from the O3 NAAQS Proposal

Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 17:47:36 +0000 

From: Possiel, Norm <Possiel.Norm@epa.gov>

To: gms@alpinegeophysics.com <gms@alpinegeophysics.com>

CC: Simon, Heather <Simon.Heather@epa.gov>

Greg, 

Alison forward your email asking for our AQ modeling files from the model runs performed for 

the proposed O3 NAAQS. 

 
Heather and I would like to talk to you to get more specifics on the files you would like to 

receive. 

What would be a good day/time this week when we could call you? 

 

Norm
§ 551.112 Education. ( a ) A pretrial inmate may participate in correspondence and self-study educational courses. Institutional staff may also arrange for educational assistance to the pretrial inmate through the use of contract personnel or community volunteers.
( b ) When consistent with institution security and good order, pretrial inmates may be allowed the opportunity to have access to the institution's educational program.
AAM-12-239-E March 15, 2012

Exemption No. 10479 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0208

Ms. Sue Larsen AM Air Service, Inc.

3011 Millstream Road Marengo, IN 60152

Dear Ms. Larsen:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated February 17, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of AM Air Service, Inc. (AM Air Service), for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulati ons (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow AM Air Service which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to AM Air Service.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.2

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant AM Air Service, Inc., an exemption from 14 CFR part 120 to the extent necessary to allow AM Air Service, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, subject to the conditions and limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of AM Air Service are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the AM Air Service part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on March 31, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/
James R. Fraser, M.D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
### §459e–12. Administration of property of William Floyd Estate; detached unit

Upon expiration or surrender of the aforesaid lease the property shall become a detached unit of the Fire Island National Seashore, and shall be administered, protected, and developed in accordance with the laws applicable thereto subject, with respect to said main dwelling and the furnishings therein, to such terms, covenants, and conditions which the Secretary shall have accepted and approved upon the donation thereof as in the public interest.

(Pub. L. 89–244, §3, Oct. 9, 1965, 79 Stat. 967.)
Mis Amigos

•	 Se recomienda que todas las personas, entre ellas los

adultos jóvenes de 19 a 24 años de edad, se vacunen

contra la gripe (influenza).

•	 Si te enfermas con la gripe podrías dejar de asistir a

la escuela y el trabajo y dejar de hacer tus actividades

extracurriculares.

•	 Los adultos de 19 a 24 años de edad pueden propagar

la gripe entre sus amigos y familiares que presentan un

alto riesgo de sufrir complicaciones a causa de la gripe,

como abuelos, hermanos más pequeños, o personas

con trastornos de salud como el asma o la diabetes.

Para más información en español visite:

http://www.cdc.gov/flu
### §450jj–7. Development and management plan for East Saint Louis, Illinois, portion of Memorial

(a) Within two years from August 24, 1984, the Commission shall develop and transmit to the Secretary a development and management plan for the East Saint Louis, Illinois, portion of the Memorial. The plan shall include—

(1) measures for the preservation of the area's resources;

(2) indications of types and general intensities of development (including visitor circulation and transportation patterns, systems, and modes) associated with public enjoyment and use of the area, including general locations, timing of implementation, and cost estimates;

(3) identification of any implementation commitments for visitor carrying capacities for all areas of the area;

(4) indications of potential modifications to the external boundaries of the area, the reasons therefore,1 and cost estimates;

(5) measures and commitments for insuring that the development, management, and operation of the area in the State of Illinois are compatible with the portion of the Memorial in the State of Missouri;

(6) opportunities and commitments for cooperative activities in the development, management, and operation of the East Saint Louis portion of the Memorial with other Federal, State, and local agencies, and the private sector; and

(7) effective and appropriate ways to increase local participation in the management of the East Saint Louis portion of the Memorial to help reduce the day-to-day operational and management responsibilities of the National Park Service and to increase opportunities for local employment.

(b) The plan shall also identify and include—

(1) needs, opportunities, and commitments for the aesthetic and economic rehabilitation of the entire East Saint Louis, Illinois, waterfront and adjacent areas, in a manner compatible with and complementary to, the Memorial, including the appropriate commitments and roles of the Federal, State, and local governments and the private sector; and

(2) cost estimates and recommendations for Federal, State, and local administrative and legislative actions.

In carrying out its duties under this section, the Commission shall take into account Federal, State, and local plans and studies respecting the area, including the study by the National Park Service on the feasibility of a museum of American ethnic culture to be a part of any development plans for the Memorial.

(May 17, 1954, ch. 204, §8, as added Pub. L. 98–398, title II, §201(a), Aug. 24, 1984, 98 Stat. 1470.)

1 So in original. Probably should be "therefor,".
#### § 904.1 Purpose and authority.

Pursuant to the National Crime Prevention and Privacy Compact (Compact), title 42, U.S.C., chapter 140, subchapter II, section 14616, Article IV (c), the Compact Council hereby establishes record screening standards for criminal history record information received by means of the III System for noncriminal justice purposes.
### §410rr–5. Study of possible inclusion of additional sites and ruins

The Secretary, acting through the National Park Service, shall undertake a study of the Rowe Ruin, Arrowhead Pueblo, Hobson-Dressler Ruin, and Las Ruedas site for the suitability and feasibility of their inclusion in the park. The Secretary shall submit the study to the Congress within one year after June 27, 1990.

(Pub. L. 101–313, title II, §206, June 27, 1990, 104 Stat. 279.)
### §460aa–14. Separability

If any provision of this subchapter is declared to be invalid, such declaration shall not affect the validity of any other provision of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 92–400, §15, Aug. 22, 1972, 86 Stat. 615.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,420,924
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      103,728
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (23,500)
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                           6,997,877
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (3,474,111)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,391,498
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                            796,888
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         1,531,086
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,595,192
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,391,498
<SALES>                                          2,326,705
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,326,705
<CGS>                                            1,311,277
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,311,277
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,503,797
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (14,085)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (12,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (2,085)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (2,085)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.00



</TABLE>