alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Questions for Big Bend Regarding FGD System and FGD Wastewater Treatment System 

NOTE: For questions that are asking you to confirm information, please correct any information 

that is incorrect (e.g., if the FGD wastewater treatment system operation has changed from the 

description listed in the questions, please provide a description of how it now operates). 

Additionally, please identify which information, if any, is considered confidential business 

information. 

1. Please confirm the FGD wastewater treatment system has the following steps: 

 Equalization tank; 

 pH adjustment (lime addition); 

 Ferric chloride addition; 

 Mixing tank; 

 Flocculating polymer addition; 

 Clarification; 

o Overflow to pH adjustment (hydrochloric acid addition); 

o Underflow to filter press; and 

o Filtrate recycled back to equalization tank. 

 Filtration. 

All of the information listed is correct with a minor correction. The filter 

press filtrate is not always recycled back to the equalization tank. If the filter 

press is working properly, it can be mixed with treated water and discharged 

through the internal outfall. 

2. Please confirm that the effluent from the wastewater treatment plant is transferred to the 

treated water transfer tank and discharged from the plant. Also confirm that the plant 

dilutes the effluent with once-through cooling water prior to discharge. 

This information is correct. 

3. For which pollutants is the plant trying to optimize removals? 

 What concentration levels need to be achieved by the system for these pollutants? 

 What concentration levels is the system achieving for these pollutants? 

Please treat the following response as confidential business information. 

[CBI Information has been removed.] 

4. What is the typical scrubber purge influent flow rate to the wastewater treatment system 

(not including any recirculation streams), based on an average 24-hour time period? 

The scrubber purge influent into the wastewater treatment system is not a 

gauged internal stream. The only gauged stream is the equalization tank 

influent into the wastewater treatment system, which flows at an average of 

190 – 195 gallons per minute. 
5. Who designed the FGD wastewater treatment system? 

The original wastewater treatment system was designed by Raytheon and 

modifications to the system after initial installation were designed by The 

Washington Group.
Six Steps for Properly Cleaning and Disinfecting Your School 

CS 319611-A 08/07/2020

Protect Your School Against COVID-19 

Properly cleaning and disinfecting surfaces and objects can help safely and effectively reduce the 

spread of disease in your school or facility. 

cdc.gov/coronavirus

✓ Always wear gloves and other personal protective equipment (PPE) appropriate for the 

chemicals being used.

✓ Cleaning and disinfection products should not be used by or near students.

✓ Make sure that there is adequate ventilation (air flow) when using chemical products 

to prevent yourself or others from inhaling toxic fumes.

1. Use an EPA-approved disinfectant against COVID-19. Visit epa.gov/listn

or scan the QR code with your smart phone to check EPA’s list of 

approved disinfectants.

2. Always follow the directions on the label. Check “use sites” and “surface 

types” to find out where the product can be used. Pay close attention to 

“precautionary statements.”

3. Clean surfaces and determine how areas will be disinfected. Clean 

surfaces with soap and water prior to disinfection. Routinely clean and 

disinfect frequently touched surfaces at least daily.

4. Follow the specified contact time. Apply the product (e.g., spray or wipe a 

surface) and allow it to dry according to the specified contact time on the label. 

5. Wear gloves and wash your hands with soap and water. Discard disposable 

gloves after each cleaning and disinfection. For reusable gloves, dedicate a 

pair to disinfecting surfaces to prevent the spread of COVID-19. After removing 

gloves, wash your hands with soap and water for at least 20 seconds.

6. Store chemicals in a secure location. Keep product lids closed tightly and 

store products in a location away from students’ reach and sight.
§ 668.209 Eligibility of work. ( a ) Permanent work must have prior program approval in accordance with paragraph (a) of § 668.215 unless such work is performed as emergency repairs.
( b ) Emergency repairs, including permanent work performed incidental to emergency repairs, and all PE may begin immediately and do not need prior program approval. Reimbursement shall be contingent upon the work ultimately being approved in accordance with the requirements of paragraph (a) of § 668.215.
( c ) To qualify for emergency relief, the damaged or destroyed road or trail shall be designated as a Federal road.
( d ) Replacement highway facilities are appropriate when it is not practical and economically feasible to repair or restore a damaged element to its preexisting condition. Emergency relief is limited to the cost of a new facility constructed to current design standards of comparable capacity and character to the destroyed facility. With respect to a bridge, a comparable facility is one which meets current geometric and construction standards for the type and volume of traffic it will carry during its design life.
( e ) Emergency relief funds may participate to the extent of eligible repair costs when proposed projects contain betterments or other work not eligible for emergency funds.
( f ) Work may include: ( 1 ) Repair to, or reconstruction of, seriously damaged highway elements for a distance which would be within normal highway right-of-way limits, including necessary clearance of debris and other deposits in drainage courses, where such work would not be classed as heavy maintenance.
( 2 ) Restoration of stream channels when the work is necessary for the satisfactory operation of the Federal road. The applicant must have responsibility and authority for maintenance and proper operation of stream channels restored.
( 3 ) Betterments where clearly economically justified to prevent future recurring damage. Economic justification acceptable to the DFDE must weigh the cost of such betterments against the risk of eligible recurring damage and the cost of future repair.
( 4 ) Actual PE and CE costs on approved projects.
( 5 ) Emergency repairs.
[43 FR 59485, Dec. 21, 1978, as amended at 47 FR 10529, Mar. 11, 1982]
Pictured is a Asian princess washing her hands with the text “Everyone loves to 

have clean hands!”
294 P.2d 625

#### Lewis Burnham SEWARD, Claimant-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF BERNALILLO (DISTRICT COURT), Employer, Central Insurance and Surety Corporation, Insurer, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 6016.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

March 5, 1956.

*53Joseph L. Smith, Henry A. Kiker, Jr., Albuquerque, Robert H. Sprecher, Roswell, for appellant.

Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Mims & Akin, Charles Larrabee, Albuquerque, for appellees.

SADLER, Justice.

The question for decision: Is a juror who suffers an accidental injury while in the' performance of his duties as such entitled to an award of compensation for his injury under the provisions of our Workmen’s Compensation Law, 1953 Comp. § 59-10-1 et seq. ?

The learned trial judge said nay. So say we. Board of Commissioners of Eagle County v. Evans, 99 Colo. 83, 60 P.2d 225.

The judgment will be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

COMPTON, C. J., LUJAN and McGHEE, JJ., and E. T. HENSLEY, Jr., District Judge, concur.
§ 1300.27 Preventing Roadside Deaths Grants. ( a ) *Purpose.* This section establishes criteria, in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 405(h), for awarding grants to States that adopt and implement effective programs to prevent death and injury from crashes involving motor vehicles striking other vehicles and individuals stopped at the roadside.
( b ) *Definitions.* As used in this section— *Digital alert technology* means a system that provides electronic notification to drivers.
*Optical visibility measure* means an action to ensure that items are seen using visible light.
*Public information campaign* means activities to build awareness with the motoring public of a traffic safety issue through media, messaging, and an organized set of communication tactics that may include but are not limited to advertising in print, internet, social media, radio and television.
( c ) *Qualification criteria.* To qualify for a grant under this section in a fiscal year, a State shall submit a plan that describes the method by which the State will use grant funds in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section. At a minimum, the plan shall state the eligible use(s) selected, consistent with paragraph (e) of this section, and include— ( 1 ) Identification of the specific safety problems to be addressed, performance measures and targets, the countermeasure strategies at the level of detail required by § 1300.11(b)(1), (3), and (4); and
( 2 ) Identification of the projects at the level of detail required by § 1300.12(b)(2) that support those strategies the State will implement during the fiscal year to carry out the plan.
( d ) *Award amounts.* The amount of a grant awarded to a State in a fiscal year under this section shall be in proportion to the amount each State received under Section 402 for fiscal year 2022.
( e ) *Use of grant funds.* A State may only use grant funds awarded under 23 U.S.C. 405(h) as follows: ( 1 ) To purchase and deploy digital alert technology that— ( i ) Is capable of receiving alerts regarding nearby first responders; and
( ii ) In the case of a motor vehicle that is used for emergency response activities, is capable of sending alerts to civilian drivers to protect first responders on the scene and en route;
( 2 ) To educate the public regarding the safety of vehicles and individuals stopped at the roadside in the State through public information campaigns for the purpose of reducing roadside deaths and injuries;
( 3 ) For law enforcement costs related to enforcing State laws to protect the safety of vehicles and individuals stopped at the roadside;
( 4 ) For programs to identify, collect, and report to State and local government agencies data related to crashes involving vehicles and individuals stopped at the roadside; and
( 5 ) To pilot and incentivize measures, including optical visibility measures, to increase the visibility of stopped and disabled vehicles.
#### Appleton Acquisition, LLC, et al., Respondents, v The National Housing Partnership et al., Appellants.

[826 NYS2d 7]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered June 1, 2006, which denied defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion granted and the complaint dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Plaintiffs are former limited partners or successors in interest to limited partners of Beautiful Village Associates Redevelopment Company (Beautiful Village), a New York limited partnership formed in 1978. Defendant National Housing Partnership (NHP) was the general partner and a subsidiary of defendant AIMCO Properties.

In 2002, NHP sent a proxy statement to plaintiff limited partners. The proxy statement proposed a merger and offered *340the limited partners a choice of $100 or 2.5 AIMCO units for each Beautiful Village limited partnership unit. The proxy statement made it clear that the limited partners could “seek a judicial determination of the value of their Partnership interests in lieu of accepting the consideration offered in the Merger.” However, the proxy statement and the attached financial statement also showed Beautiful Village as having negative value.

Some of plaintiff limited partners voted in favor of the merger; others were forced to accept it because more than 51% of the limited partnership interests voted in favor of the merger. The merger was consummated in 2003. It is undisputed that none of the limited partners exercised their appraisal rights under Partnership Law § 121-1102 (b) and (c).

Plaintiffs sued NHP for breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract, AIMCO and Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIMCO’s owner) for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, and all defendants for fraud and negligent misrepresentation. They sought rescission of the merger and/or damages.

The instant dispute is controlled entirely by Partnership Law § 121-1102 (d). Since no limited partner exercised its rights under subdivisions (b) and (c), subsequent action by a limited partner in “law or in equity ... to attack the validity of the merger . . . , or to have the merger . . . set aside or rescinded” is barred *(id.).*Therefore the complaint must be dismissed. We decline plaintiffs’ invitation to rewrite the statute and graft the fraud exception of Business Corporation Law § 623 (k) onto an otherwise clear legislative pronouncement. That determination is properly left to the Legislature. Concur—Saxe, J.P, Marlow, Nardelli, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                CFO CERTIFICATION



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of John H. Harland Company (the "Company") for
the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




/s/ Charles B. Carden                         3/8/2004
------------------------------                -------------------------
Charles B. Carden                             Date
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 939 

AN ACT 

To establish limitations regarding Confucius Institutes, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 939 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Concerns Over Nations 

3 Funding University Campus Institutes in the United 

4 States Act’’ or the ‘‘CONFUCIUS Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. RESTRICTIONS ON CONFUCIUS INSTITUTES. 

6 (a) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘Confu7 cius Institute’’ means a cultural institute directly or indi8 rectly funded by the Government of the People’s Republic 

9 of China. 

10 (b) RESTRICTIONS ON CONFUCIUS INSTITUTES.—An 

11 institution of higher education or other postsecondary edu12 cational institution (referred to in this section as an ‘‘insti13 tution’’) shall not be eligible to receive Federal funds from 

14 the Department of Education (except funds under title IV 

15 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070 

16 et seq.) or other Department of Education funds that are 

17 provided directly to students) unless the institution en18 sures that any contract or agreement between the institu19 tion and a Confucius Institute includes clear provisions 

20 that— 

21 (1) protect academic freedom at the institution; 

22 (2) prohibit the application of any foreign law 

23 on any campus of the institution; and 

24 (3) grant full managerial authority of the Con25 fucius Institute to the institution, including full con26 trol over what is being taught, the activities carried 
3 

†S 939 ES

1 out, the research grants that are made, and who is 

2 employed at the Confucius Institute. 

Passed the Senate June 10, 2020. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 939 

AN ACT 

To establish limitations regarding Confucius 

Institutes, and for other purposes.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-41064

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ROSALIO GONZALEZ-HERNANDEZ, also known as Alfredo Gonzalez-Gomez,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:11-CR-498-1

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rosalio GonzalezHernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gonzalez-Hernandez has not filed a response. We have

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. 

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 17, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-41064 Document: 00511824450 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/17/2012
No. 11-41064

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 11-41064 Document: 00511824450 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/17/2012
```
                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned hereby makes, constitutes,

designates and appoints Dave Downing, Tim Paymal and Rick Parod as the undersigned's

true and lawful attorney-in-fact to act for and on behalf of the undersigned for and

limited to the following purposes:

a.  To execute for and on behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigned's

capacity as an officer and/or director of Lindsay Manufacturing Co., a Deleware

corporation (the "Company"), Forms 3, 4 and 5 in accordance with Section 16(a)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and

the rules thereunder;

b.  To do and perform any and all acts for and on behalf of the undersigned

which may be necessary or desirable to complete and execute any individual or

group filings under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act and timely file such

forms with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any stock

exchange or similar authority; and

c.  To take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the

foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be of benefit to,

in the best interest of, or legally required by, the undersigned, it being

understood that the documents executed by such attorney-in-fact on behalf of

the undersigned pursuant to this Power of Attorney shall be in such form and

shall contain such terms and conditions as such attorney-in-fact may approve in

such attorney-in-fact's discretion.

The undersigned hereby grants to each such attorney-in-fact full power and

authority ot do and perform any and every act and thing whatsoever requisite,

necessary, or proper to be done in the exercise of any of the rights and powers

herein granted, as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might

or could do if personally present, with full power of substitution or

revocation, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-fact shall

lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of theis Power of Attorney and the

righs and powers herein granted.  The undersigned acknowledges that the

foregoing attorneys-in-fact, in serving in such capacity at the request of the

undersigned, are not assuming, nor is the Company assuming, any of

the undersigned's responsibilities to comply with Section 16 of the

Exchange Act.

This Power of Attorney shall remain in full force and effect until the

undersigned is no longer required to make filings uner Section 16(a) of the

Exchange Act with the respect to the undersigned's holdings of the

transactions in securities issued by the Company, unless earlier revoked by

the undersigned in a signed writing delivered to the foregoing attorneys-

in-fact and the Secretary of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned has caused this Power of Attorney to be

executed as of theis 8th day of November, 2005.

Rick Parod

-----------

signature
```
<PAGE>


                                                                     Exhibit 21

                                   Harmon Industries, Inc.
                          Listing of Subsidiaries at December 31, 1998

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                  NAME UNDER WHICH
SUBSIDIARY NAME                                   BUSINESS IS CONDUCTED                           JURISDICTION
---------------                                   ---------------------                          -------------
<S>                                               <C>                                             <C>
Consolidated Asset Management                     Consolidated Asset Management                   Missouri
Company, Inc.                                     Company, Inc.

Harmon Railway Systems                            Harmon Railway Systems                          Virgin Islands
International Corporation                         International Corporation

Vaughan Harmon Systems, Ltd.                      Vaughan Harmon Systems, Ltd.                    England

Vale Harmon Enterprises, Ltd.                     Vale Harmon Enterprises, Ltd.                   Quebec, Canada

Devtronics, Inc.                                  Devtronics, Inc.                                Florida

Harmon Industries Australia Pty. Ltd.             Harmon Industries Australia Pty. Ltd.           Australia

Industrias Harmon de Mexico, SA de CV             Industrias Harmon de Mexico, SA de CV           Mexico

CSS, Inc.                                         CSS, Inc.                                       Indiana

SES CO, Inc.                                      SES CO, Inc.                                    Massachusetts

Seaboard Systems, Inc.                            Seaboard Systems, Inc.                          Massachusetts
</TABLE>

                                            Page 91
### §460v–6. Addition of lands to Forest; administration of land for Colorado River storage project by Secretary of the Interior

Subject to any valid claim or entry now existing and hereafter legally maintained, all public lands of the United States and all lands of the United States heretofore or hereafter acquired or reserved for use in connection with the Colorado River storage project within the exterior boundaries of the recreation area which have not heretofore been added to and made a part of the Ashley National Forest, and all lands of the United States acquired for the purpose of the recreation area, are hereby added to and made a part of the Ashley National Forest: Provided, That lands within the flow lines of any reservoir operated and maintained by the Department of the Interior or otherwise needed or used for the operation of the Colorado River storage project shall continue to be administered by the Secretary of the Interior to the extent he determines to be required for such operation.

(Pub. L. 90–540, §7, Oct. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 905.)
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statements Nos.
333-15445,  333-39383,  333-74473,  333-75719 on Form S-3, and No.  333-74809 on
Form S-4 of FINOVA  Capital  Corporation (a subsidiary of The FINOVA Group Inc.)
of our report dated April 23, 1999  appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of FINOVA Capital Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1999.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Phoenix, Arizona

March 7, 2000