alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-20631

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SARAH MONTEBELLO,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas

(95-CR-114-1)

July 23, 1997

Before KING, DAVIS, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

On May 24, 1995, Sarah Montbello was indicted for knowingly

devising and attempting a scheme and artifice to defraud

Nationsbank, a federally insured financial institution, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344. Montebello was accused of causing

another to (1) open a checking account at Nationsbank, Houston,

Texas, (2) deposit counterfeit checks into that account, and (3)
2

make withdrawals from that account before the checks deposited had

cleared through the normal course of business. Montebello was

arraigned on June 19, 1995, and entered a plea of not guilty.

After a jury trial, Montebello was found guilty and sentenced to 33

months in prison, supervised release for three years, and a fine of

$7,545. Montebello appeals from the judgment of conviction and

sentence entered by the district court.

On appeal, Montebello asserts the following arguments: (1)

the district court violated her right to a speedy trial under the

Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(c)(1); (2) the district court

abused its discretion by allowing the introduction of certain

extrinsic evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 404(b); (3) the district

court erred by failing to suppress evidence obtained as the fruits

of an allegedly illegal arrest; (4) the district court abused its

discretion by denying Montebello’s motion for mistrial based upon

an alleged impermissibly suggestive pretrial identification

procedure; (5) the district court clearly erred in determining that

Montebello was the leader/organizer of a criminal scheme involving

at least five participants; and (6) the district court clearly

erred in determining the amount of loss attributable to Montebello

for sentencing purposes. 

We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the reply brief, the

record excerpts, and relevant portions of the record itself. We

are satisfied that the judgment of the district court should, in
3

all things, be AFFIRMED.
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3613 — Techint/Stella/James Jones/Investindustrial/Clessidra/Sirti)

(2005/C 9/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 7 December 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in Italian and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
§ 636.406 Are communications allowed prior to establishing the competitive range? Yes, prior to establishing the competitive range, you may conduct communications to: ( a ) Enhance your understanding of proposals;
( b ) Allow reasonable interpretation of the proposal; or
( c ) Facilitate your evaluation process.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Article 5 Fin. Data Schedule for 3rd Qtr 10-Q

<S>                               <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-2002
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-2002
<PERIOD-END>                      SEP-30-2002
<CASH>                                   293
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         293
<PP&E>                                     0
<DEPRECIATION>                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           293
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      0
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                              51,900
<OTHER-SE>                                 0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               0
<SALES>                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           0
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            0
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                            (100)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (.00)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
                  SUBSIDIARIES OF GULFMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
      NAME OF SUBSIDIARY OR ORGANIZATION                     STATE OR COUNTRY OF INCORPORATION
-------------------------------------------                 ------------------------------------
<S>                                                                   <C>
Ercon Development Co.                                                      Texas
Gulf Offshore N.S. Ltd.                                               United Kingdom
GulfMark North Sea Ltd.                                               United Kingdom
Dianne Operating Ltd.                                                 United Kingdom
Gulf Marine Far East PTE, Ltd.                                           Singapore
Gulf Offshore Marine International, Inc.                                  Panama
Gulf Offshore Far East Inc.                                               Panama
SeaMark, Ltd.                                                             Panama
Gulf Marine do Brazil, Ltd.                                               Brazil
Semaring Logistics (M) Sdn. Bhd.                                         Malaysia
Chalvoyage (M) Sdn. Bhd.                                                 Malaysia
Energy Ventures, Inc.                                                    Delaware
Gulf Offshore Shipping Services Inc.                                      Panama
GulfMark Offshore, Inc.                                                  Delaware
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

         In  connection  with  the  quarterly  report  of  FreeStar   Technology
Corporation ("Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission  ("Report"),  the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the dates indicated  below,  hereby certify pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  Section 1350) that to
their knowledge:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: July 21, 2006

By: /s/  Paul Egan
-------------------------------
Paul Egan
Chief Executive Officer

Dated: July 21, 2006

By: /s/  Ciaran Egan
-------------------------------
Ciaran Egan
Secretary/Treasurer/Chief Financial Officer
如厕后,

要洗手

1 克粪便(相当于一个蚕豆的重量!)

里可能有一万亿个细菌
(No. 82-CC-0312

#### Clarence Eugene Wilson, Claimant, *v.*The State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 26, 1982.*

Clarence Eugene Wilson, *pro se,*for Claimant.

Tyrone C. Fahner, Attorney General (Sue Mueller, Assistant Attorney .General, of counsel), for Respondent.

*383Poch, J.

This claim comes before the Court upon the joint stipulation of the parties, which states as follows:

1. That Claimant lost $10.00 a month of his stipend for the months of March, April, May and July while incarcerated at Pontiac Correctional Center.

2. That Respondent concedes liability for the loss of said property to the extent agreed upon herein.

3. That both parties agree that the value of the lost property amounts to $40.00.

4. That no other evidence, oral or written, will be presented to the Court, and both parties waive briefs.

5. That both parties agree to the granting of an award to Claimant for $40.00.

6. That both parties agree that said award will constitute full and final satisfaction of the claim herein or any other claim arising out of the same occurrence.

While the Court is not necessarily bound by a stipulation such as this, it has no desire to interpose a controversy where none appears to exist. The stipulation submitted by the parties appears to have been entered into freely and fairly, and its contents appear to be reasonable. The Court, therefore, finds no reason not to accept it and to follow its recommendation of an award for $40.00.

Claimant is hereby awarded the amount of $40.00 in full and final satisfaction of the instant claim.
### §433l. Erection of monuments and tablets

Any State, or political subdivision thereof, organization, or individual may, with the approval of the Secretary of the Interior, erect monuments or place tablets within the boundaries of the Whitman Mission National Historic Site.

(June 29, 1936, ch. 863, §3, 49 Stat. 2029; Pub. L. 87–471, May 31, 1962, 76 Stat. 90.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Whitman National Monument" redesignated "Whitman Mission National Historic Site" by Pub. L. 87–471, set out as section 433n of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF GUILFORD MILLS, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 1, 1995,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-03-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-01-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          17,964
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  157,523
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (8,867)
<INVENTORY>                                    106,008
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               285,927
<PP&E>                                         547,168
<DEPRECIATION>                                 302,576
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 586,371
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          107,694
<BONDS>                                        166,368
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           393
<OTHER-SE>                                     267,156
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   586,371
<SALES>                                        782,518
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               782,518
<CGS>                                          644,344
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  714,702
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,506
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,122
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 50,188
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,552
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,636
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,636
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.21
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Earl W. Thorne, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ. [See *post,*p. 734.]
**Exhibit 23.1**

Report and Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc.: 

Under date of March 2,2009, we reported on the consolidated balance sheets of TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cashflows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, as contained in the annual report on Form 10-K for the year 2008. In connection with our audits of the aforementioned consolidated financial statements, we alsoaudited the related consolidated financial statement schedule as listed in the accompanying index. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thisfinancial statement schedule based on our audits. 

In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidatedfinancial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. 

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the registration statements (No. 333-81245 and No. 333-36112) on Form S-3 and (No. 333-75464, No. 333-08891, No. 333-08893, No. 333-02166, No. 333-31585, No. 333-48883, No. 333-66707,No. 333-74617, No. 333-81273, No. 333-39732, No. 333-39730, No. 333-61582, No. 333-65850, No. 333-89242, No. 333-102085, No. 333-105701, No. 333-115809, No. 333-120407, No. 333-125269,No. 333-134470, No. 333-143337, and No. 333-151192) on Form S-8 of the Company of our report dated March 2, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and therelated consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, and the related financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which report appears in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of the Company. 

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Interpretation No. 48, *Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes* and adoptedEmerging Issues Task Force Issue (EITF) No. 06-02, *Accounting for Sabbatical Leave and Other Similar Benefits Pursuant to FASB Statement No. 43*. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Portland, Oregon 

March 2, 2009
Cov Tsos Mob ntawm Tus Kab Mob Khaus Lauv 

Nam Vais Lav (Coronavirus, COVID-19)

cdc.gov/coronavirus

316475-W 06/15/2020

Paub txog cov tsos mob ntawm Tus Kab Mob Khaus Viv-19 (COVID-19), uas yog muaj 

raws li nram qab no:

*Nrhiav kev saib xyuas kho mob tam sim ntawd yog hais tias ib tus neeg twg 

muaj cov tsos mob uas ceeb toom txog kev mob hnyav ntawm Tus Kab Mob 

Khaus Viv-19 (COVID-19).

• Kev pa nyuaj

• Mob ua ntu zus tsis tseg li los sis 

ceev hauv siab

• Kev nyuaj siab ntxhov plawv tshiab

• Tsim dab ntub nyuaj los sis 

xav tso dab ntub nkaus xwb

• Ob sab di ncauj los sis ntsej 

muag xiav lus ntshaus ntsho

Hnoos Ua daus no Mob cov leeg nqaij

Txog siav los sis 

ua pa nyuaj*

Tsis hnov qab los los sis 

tsis hnov ntxhiab zoo

Mob qa

Cov tsos mob muaj peev xwm suav xam los ntawm kev mob khaub thuas me ntsis 

txog rau kev mob khaub thuas hnyav, thiab tshwm sim nyob rau 2-14 hnub tom qab 

koj raug tau tus kab mob vais lav (virus) uas ua rau tshwm sim muaj Tus Kab Mob 

Khaus Viv-19 (COVID-19). 

Daim ntawv teev npe no tsis muaj tag nrho txhua cov tsos mob uas muaj feem tshwm sim tau. Thov hu 

rau koj tus kws muab kev saib xyuas kho mob fab kev kuaj mob txog rau txhua cov tsos mob lwm yam 

uas mob loj los sis muaj kev txhawj xeeb txog uas cuam tshuam txog koj.

Kub taub hau
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 91182 / February 22, 2021

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension, pursuant to 

Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, of trading in the securities of Bangi, Inc.

(BNGI) (CIK No. 0001327238), a defaulted Nevada corporation based in Grosse Pointe Farms, 

Michigan at 9:30 a.m. EST on February 23, 2021 and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EST on March 8, 

2021. 

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of BNGI because of questions 

regarding the accuracy and adequacy of information about BNGI and its securities in the 

marketplace concerning, among other things, BNGI’s activities, and potentially fraudulent 

trading activity affecting the market for its securities, including: (a) since at least mid-January 

2021, certain social media accounts may be engaged in a coordinated attempt to artificially 

influence BNGI’s share price; and (b) BNGI’s share price and trading volume have greatly 

increased since at least mid-January 2021 in the absence of any publicly available news from 

BNGI. 

The Commission cautions broker-dealers, shareholders, and prospective purchasers that they 

should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available 

information and any information subsequently issued by the company. 

Further, brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Rule 15c2-11 under the 

Exchange Act, at the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered unless 

and until they have strictly complied with all of the provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer 

has any questions as to whether or not it has complied with the rule, it should not enter any 

quotation but immediately contact the staff in the Division of Trading and Markets, Office of 

Interpretation and Guidance, at (202) 551-5777. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is 

required by Rule 15c2-11, it should refrain from entering quotations relating to BNGI securities 

until such time as it has familiarized itself with the rule and is certain that all of its provisions 

have been met. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation which is in violation of the rule, the 

Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement action.

If any broker-dealer or other person has any information that may relate to this matter, they 

should immediately contact Ana D. Petrovic, Assistant Regional Director, at (312) 886-8176. 

The Commission appreciates the assistance of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

________________ _____________
No. 1D17-3953

________________ _____________
T YROME T ERRELL R OBERTS S R ., Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

________________ _____________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Gary L. Bergosh, Judge.

February 8, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , W INSOR , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur.

________________ _____________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fl a. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

________________ _____________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Stev en L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahass ee, for Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney Gene ral, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
### §430m. Administration

The administration, development, preservation, and maintenance of the battlefield shall be exercised by the Secretary of the Interior in accordance with the Act of August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535; 16 U.S.C. 1 et seq.),1 as amended and supplemented, and the Act of August 21, 1935 (49 Stat. 666).1

(June 21, 1934, ch. 694, §4, 48 Stat. 1199; Pub. L. 94–578, title III, §319(4), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2738.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Act of August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535; 16 U.S.C. 1 et seq.), referred to in text, is act Aug. 25, 1916, ch. 408, 39 Stat. 535, known as the National Park Service Organic Act, which enacted sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 of this title and provisions set out as a note under section 100101 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs. Sections 1 to 4 of the Act were repealed and restated as section 1865(a) of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and section 100101(a), chapter 1003, and sections 100751(a), 100752, 100753, and 102101 of Title 54 by Pub. L. 113–287, §§3, 4(a)(1), 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3094, 3260, 3272. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables. For disposition of former sections of this title, see Disposition Table preceding section 100101 of Title 54.

The Act of August 21, 1935 (49 Stat. 666), referred to in text, is act Aug. 21, 1935, ch. 593, 49 Stat. 666, known as the Historic Sites Act of 1935 and also as the Historic Sites, Buildings, and Antiquities Act, which enacted sections 461 to 467 of this title. The Act was repealed and restated as section 1866(a) of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and sections 102303 and 102304 and chapter 3201 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs, by Pub. L. 113–287, §§3, 4(a)(1), 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3094, 3260, 3272. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables. For disposition of former sections of this title, see Disposition Table preceding section 100101 of Title 54.

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–578 substituted "The administration, development, preservation, and maintenance of the battlefield shall be exercised by the Secretary of the Interior in accordance with the Act of August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535; 16 U.S.C. 1 et seq.), as amended and supplemented, and the Act of August 21, 1935 (49 Stat. 666)" for "The affairs of the Monocacy National Military Park shall, subject to the supervision and direction of the National Park Service of the Interior Department, be in charge of a superintendent, to be appointed by the Secretary of the Interior".

1 See References in Text note below.
---

---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PremierWest Bancorp (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John L. Anhorn, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                       
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period certified.
|  

This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any of the Companys filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise be deemed to be filed as part of the Report or under such Acts.

|Date: |  | July 28, 2006 |  | /s/ JOHN L. ANHORN                   
|----- |  | ------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|      |  |               |  | John L. Anhorn                       
|      |  |               |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

---

---