alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 6 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.6
                                          Agreed to May 22, 2019        

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. COMMEMORATIVE DOCUMENT AUTHORIZED.

    (a) In General.--A commemorative document in memory of the late 
President of the United States, George Herbert Walker Bush, shall be 
printed as a House document, with illustrations and suitable binding, 
under the direction of the Joint Committee on Printing.
    (b) Contents.--The document shall consist of the eulogies and 
encomiums for George Herbert Walker Bush, as expressed in the Senate 
and the House of Representatives, together with the texts of each of 
the following:
        (1) The state funeral ceremony at the United States Capitol 
    Rotunda.
        (2) The national funeral service held at the Washington 
    National Cathedral, Washington, District of Columbia.
        (3) The memorial service held at St. Martin's Episcopal Church, 
    Houston, Texas.
        (4) The interment ceremony at the George Herbert Walker Bush 
    Presidential Library Center, College Station, Texas.

SEC. 2. PRINTING OF DOCUMENT.

    In addition to the usual number of copies printed, there shall be 
printed the lesser of--
        (1) 32,500 copies of the commemorative document, of which 
    22,150 copies shall be for the use of the House of Representatives 
    and 10,350 copies shall be for the use of the Senate; or
        (2) such number of copies of the commemorative document that 
    does not exceed a production and printing cost of $1,000,000, with 
    distribution of the copies to be allocated in the same proportion 
    as described in paragraph (1).
Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7334
BRYAN GARNETT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GARY WATERS, Chief of Security; THOMPSON, Deputy Court Escort; JOHN DOE, Medical Administrator; COFRAN, Deputy; JOHN DOE, No. 1 Deputy; COLTRALL, Deputy; All others associated, sued in their individual and official capacities, Defendants - Appellees, and COFTRAN, Deputy Court Escort, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:06-cv-00314-HEH) Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 20, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.- 2 - Bryan Garnett, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 3 - PER CURIAM: Bryan Garnett appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Garnett v. Waters , No. 3:06-cv-00314-HEH (E.D. Va. Aug. 14, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Michigan Supreme

Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 17, 2015 

# Order

March 17, 2015

150775 ( 18 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN

, Plaintiff

- Appell ee

,

v

RICHARD CLARE PATHIC, JR.

, Defendant

- Appell ant

. SC: 150775

COA: 323817

Isabella CC: 2013

- 002436

- FC

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant

- appellant for leave to file a

supplement brief is GRANTED. The supplement brief submitted on March 6, 2015, is

accepted for filing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

          - 26 CFR Part 1
          - [REG-131947-10]
          - RIN 1545-BJ71

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Cancellation of notice of public hearing on proposed rulemaking.

# SUMMARY:

This document cancels a public hearing on a proposed rulemaking relating to determining when property is traded on an established market (that is, publicly traded) for purposes of determining the issue price of a debt instrument.

# DATES:

The public hearing originally scheduled for April 13, 2011 at 10 a.m. is cancelled.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Funmi Taylor of the Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration) at (202) 622-7180 (not a toll-free number).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    A notice of proposed rulemaking and a notice of public hearing that appeared in the                     **Federal Register**                     on Friday, January 7, 2011 (76 FR 1101) announced that a public hearing was scheduled for April 13, 2011, at 10 a.m. in the IRS Auditorium, Internal Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The subject of the public hearing is under section 1273(b) of the Internal Revenue Code.                

The public comment period for the proposed rulemaking expired on March 8, 2011. The notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing instructed those interested in testifying at the public hearing to submit an outline of the topics to be addressed. As of Tuesday, March 15, 2011, no one has requested to speak. Therefore, the public hearing scheduled for April 13, 2011, is cancelled.

LaNita VanDyke,

Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing  Division, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration).

[FR Doc. 2011-6603 Filed 3-21-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
§ 505.5 Definitions. Unless otherwise specified in this part, the definitions contained in 23 U.S.C. 101(a) are applicable to this part. In addition, the following definitions apply: *Applicant* means either: ( 1 ) A State Transportation Department, or
( 2 ) A group of State Transportation Departments, with one State acting as the project lead.
*Eligible project* means any surface transportation project or set of integrated surface transportation projects closely related in the function they perform eligible for Federal assistance under title 23, United States Code, including public or private rail facilities providing benefits to highway users, surface transportation infrastructure modifications to facilitate intermodal interchange, transfer, and access into and out of ports and other activities eligible under such title.
*Eligible project costs* means the costs pertaining to an eligible project for: ( 1 ) Development phase activities, including planning, feasibility analysis, revenue forecasting, environmental review, preliminary engineering and design work, and other preconstruction activities;
( 2 ) Construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, and acquisition of real property (including land related to the project and improvements to land), environmental mitigation, construction contingencies, acquisition of equipment, and operational improvements; and
( 3 ) all debt financing costs authorized by 23 U.S.C. 122.
*Full Funding Grant Agreement (FFGA)* means the agreement used to provide Federal financial assistance under title 23, United States Code, for Projects of National and Regional Significance. An FFGA defines the scope of the project, establishes the maximum amount of Government financial assistance for the project, covers the period of time for completion of the project, facilitates the efficient management of the project in accordance with applicable Federal statutes, regulations, and policy, including oversight roles and responsibilities, and other terms and conditions.
```

[Federal Register: January 27, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 17)]
[Rules and Regulations]               
[Page 4269]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr27ja10-7]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0605; Airspace Docket No. 09-ASO-19]

 
Establishment of Class E Airspace; Clayton, GA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action confirms the effective date of a direct final rule 
published in the Federal Register September 14, 2009 that establishes 
Class E Airspace at Heaven's Landing Airport, Clayton, GA.

DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, January 27, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melinda Giddens, Operations Support 
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. 
Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 305-5610.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Confirmation of Effective Date

    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for 
comments in the Federal Register on September 14, 2009 (74 FR 46893), 
Docket No. FAA-2009-0605; Airspace Docket 09-ASO-19. The FAA uses the 
direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule where 
the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. This 
direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were 
anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written 
notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received 
within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on 
December 17, 2009. No adverse comments were received, and thus this 
notice confirms that effective date.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on January 14, 2010.
Myron A. Knight,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air 
Traffic Organization.
[FR Doc. 2010-1381 Filed 1-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
### §428k. Addition of lands

In furtherance of the purposes of sections 428 to 428d and 428e to 428i of this title and to facilitate an appropriate observance of the one hundredth anniversary of the Battle of Fort Donelson, the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to designate for addition to the present Fort Donelson National Battlefield such lands and interests in lands adjacent to said battlefield as in his discretion are necessary to preserve and interpret this historic battleground, including the nearby historic Surrender House and the land upon which it is situated on Spring Street in the town of Dover, Tennessee.

(Pub. L. 86–738, §§1, 4, Sept. 8, 1960, 74 Stat. 875, 876; Pub. L. 108–367, §6, Oct. 25, 2004, 118 Stat. 1745.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2004—Pub. L. 108–367 substituted "Tennessee" for "Tennessee, but the total area commemorating the battle of Fort Donelson shall not exceed 600 acres".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Fort Donelson National Battlefield" and "battlefield" substituted in text for "Fort Donelson National Military Park" and "park", respectively, in view of redesignation of Fort Donelson National Military Park as Fort Donelson National Battlefield by Pub. L. 86–738, §4, set out as section 428n of this title.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 99078 / December 4, 2023

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-20252

In the Matter of

Scott T Wolfrum, 

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER APPOINTING 

TAX ADMINISTRATOR

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-20253

In the Matter of

Tyler C. Sadek,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

On May 4, 2022, the Commission issued an Omnibus Order Directing the Engagement of 

Two Tax Administrators for Appointment on a Case-By-Case Basis in Administrative 

Proceedings that Establish Distribution Funds (the “Omnibus Order”).1 The Omnibus Order 

engaged Miller Kaplan Arase LLP and Heffler, Radetich & Saitta, LLP to serve as the 

Commission’s tax administrator (“Tax Administrator”), for selection and appointment on an 

individual case basis, for calendar years 2022 through 2024 in administrative proceedings where 

the distribution fund may incur tax-related obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) 

under the Department of the Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 94845 (May 4, 2022).
2

The Director of the Division of Enforcement is authorized to appoint a Tax Administrator 

pursuant to the Omnibus Order.2 The Commission staff has requested the appointment of Miller 

Kaplan Arase LLP as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceedings.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the Omnibus Order, Miller Kaplan Arase 

LLP is appointed as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceedings.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.3

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary

2

 See Delegation of Authority to Director of the Division of Enforcement, Securities Act Rel. No. 10900 (Dec. 10, 

2020).

3

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(ii).
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 334 

Instructing the managers on the part of the Senate on the bill S. 1790 

(116th Congress) to insist upon the provisions contained in section 316 

of the Senate bill (relating to a prohibition on the use of perfluoroalkyl 

substances and polyfluoroalkyl substances for land-based applications of 

firefighting foam). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2019 

Mr. PETERS (for himself and Mr. BENNET) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Instructing the managers on the part of the Senate on the 

bill S. 1790 (116th Congress) to insist upon the provisions contained in section 316 of the Senate bill (relating 

to a prohibition on the use of perfluoroalkyl substances 

and polyfluoroalkyl substances for land-based applications of firefighting foam). 

1 Resolved, That the managers on the part of the Sen2 ate at the conference on the disagreeing votes of the two 

3 Houses on the House amendment to the bill S. 1790 

4 (116th Congress) are instructed to insist upon the provi5 sions of section 316 of the Senate bill (relating to a prohi6 bition on the use of perfluoroalkyl substances and 


dlhill on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 334 ATS 

1 polyfluoroalkyl substances for land-based applications of 

2 firefighting foam). 

Æ 


dlhill on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with BILLS
#### § 36.603 Preliminary determination.

Upon receipt and review of all information relevant to a request filed by a submitting official for certification of a code, and after consultation with the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board, the Assistant Attorney General shall make a preliminary determination of equivalency or a preliminary determination to deny certification.

[AG Order No. 3181-2010, 75 FR 56257, Sept. 15, 2010]
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940

Release No. 6572 / March 14, 2024

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-20531

In the Matter of the Application of

HORTER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC, 

and DREW K. HORTER

For Review of Action Taken by

FINRA

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ISSUE DECISION

The Commission has determined, in its discretion, that it is appropriate to extend by 90

days the period within which the decision in this matter may be issued. Accordingly, IT IS 

ORDERED that such period be, and hereby is, extended to June 12, 2024. 

By the Commission.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary
§ 97.2 Definitions. ( a ) *Crime of violence.* The term “crime of violence” has the same meaning as in section 924(c)(3) of title 18, United States Code. Section 924(c)(3) states that the term crime of violence means an offense that is a felony and has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another, or that by its nature, involves a substantial risk that physical force against the person or property of another may be used in the course of committing the offense.
( b ) *Private prisoner transport company.* The term “private prisoner transport company” (“company”) means any entity, other than the United States, a State, or an inferior political subdivision of a State, that engages in the business of transporting for compensation individuals committed to the custody of any State or of an inferior political subdivision of a State, or any attempt thereof.
( c ) *Violent prisoner.* The term “violent prisoner” means any individual in the custody of a State or an inferior political subdivision of a State who has previously been convicted of or is currently charged with a crime of violence or any similar statute of a State or the inferior political subdivisions of a State, or any attempt thereof.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 99547 / February 15, 2024

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-21246

In the Matter of the Application of

WILFREDO FELIX

For Review of Action Taken by

FINRA

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ISSUE DECISION

The Commission has determined, in its discretion, that it is appropriate to extend by 90

days the period within which the decision in this matter may be issued. Accordingly, IT IS 

ORDERED that such period be, and hereby is, extended to May 15, 2024.

By the Commission.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary
§ 65.11 Limitations on fund and other assistance use. ( a ) *Land acquisition.* No funds shall be used for the purpose of land acquisition.
( b ) *Non-supplantation.* No funds shall be used to supplant state or local funds that would otherwise be made available for such purposes.
( c ) *Civil justice.* No funds or other assistance shall be used with respect to civil justice matters except to the extent that such civil justice matters bear directly and substantially upon criminal justice matters or are inextricably intertwined with criminal justice matters.
( d ) *Federal law enforcement personnel.* Nothing in the enabling legislation authorizes the use of Federal law enforcement personnel to investigate violations of criminal law other than violations with respect to which investigation is authorized by other provisions of law. (section 609O(a), of the Act).
( e ) *Direction, supervision, control.* Nothing in the enabling legislation shall be construed to authorize the Attorney General or the Federal law enforcement community to exercise any direction, supervision, or control over any police force or other criminal justice agency of an applicant for Federal law enforcement assistance. (section 609O(b), of the Act).
### §460bbb. Findings

The Congress finds that—

(1) the Smith River, undammed and free-flowing from its headwaters to the Pacific Ocean, represents one of the last wholly intact vestiges of an invaluable legacy of wild and scenic rivers;

(2) the Smith River watershed, from the diverse conifer forests of the Siskiyou Mountains and unique botanical communities of the North Fork serpentine to the ancient redwoods along the river's lower reaches, exhibits a richness of ecological diversity unusual in a basin of its size;

(3) the Smith River watershed's scenic beauty, renowned anadromous fisheries, exceptional water quality, and abundant wildlife combine with its ready accessibility to offer exceptional opportunities for a wide range of recreational activities, including wilderness, water sports, fishing, hunting, camping, and sightseeing;

(4) careful development and utilization at mutually compatible levels of recreation, fisheries, and timber resources on public lands will ensure the continuation of the Smith River watershed's historic role as a significant contributor to the region's local economy; and

(5) protection of the Smith River's unique values can be enhanced by a cooperative effort by Federal, State and local governments to coordinate land-use planning, management, and development of Federal and non-Federal lands throughout the watershed.

(Pub. L. 101–612, §2, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3209.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 101–612, §1, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3209, provided that: "Sections 1 through 14 of this Act [enacting this subchapter, amending section 1274 of this title, and enacting provisions set out as a note under section 460bbb–7 of this title] may be cited as the 'Smith River National Recreation Area Act'."
#### § 750.152 Application.

The following standards apply to directional and official signs and notices located within six hundred and sixty (660) feet of the right-of-way of the Interstate and Federal-aid primary systems and to those located beyond six hundred and sixty (660) feet of the right-of-way of such systems, outside of urban areas, visible from the main traveled way of such systems and erected with the purpose of their message being read from such main traveled way. These standards do not apply to directional and official signs erected on the highway right-of-way.

[40 FR 21934, May 20, 1975]