alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §410x. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums, but not more than $13,900,000, as may be needed for the acquisition of lands and interests in lands and for development of the Minute Man National Historical Park, of which not more than $10,900,000 shall be used for acquisition purposes, and in addition thereto, such sums as may be needed for its administration and maintenance. For fiscal years after fiscal year 1991, there is authorized to be appropriated an additional $15,000,000 for development and an additional $7,300,000 for acquisition of lands and interests in lands.

(Pub. L. 86–321, §6, Sept. 21, 1959, 73 Stat. 592; Pub. L. 91–548, §2, Dec. 14, 1970, 84 Stat. 1437; Pub. L. 102–488, §2(4)[(3)], Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3136.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–488 inserted at end "For fiscal years after fiscal year 1991, there is authorized to be appropriated an additional $15,000,000 for development and an additional $7,300,000 for acquisition of lands and interests in lands."

1970—Pub. L. 91–548 substituted "$13,900,000" for "$8,000,000" and "$10,900,000" for "$5,000,000".
(Nos. 82-CC-0052, 82-CC-0069 cons.

#### Good Samaritan Hospital, Claimant, *v.*The State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed May 5, 1982.*

David Campbell, for Claimant.

Tyrone C. Fahner, Attorney General (Sue Mueller, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.

Roe, C. J.

These consolidated causes, coming on to be heard on the motion of Respondent to dismiss, due notice having been given, and the Court being fully advised finds as follows:

1. That Claimant, a medical vendor, seeks compensation from the Illinois Department of Public Aid (IDPA) for hospital services rendered to two public aid recipients.

2. That, as fully set forth *in the*departmental report, which is *prima facie*evidence of the facts therein set forth, in each instance the services consisted of care and treatment directly relating to sterilization surgery — specifically, hysterectomy surgery — performed upon the recipient-patient during her inpatient stay in Claimant’s facility.

3. That the Respondent’s payment obligation for such surgeries and related hospital services is limited by *380certain conditions, as set forth in Department (IDPA) Rule 4.15 and related IDPA policy directives, as well as in Federal law. See D. R. Exhibits Nos. R-l, R-2 and R-3. Two such conditions, both relating to hysterectomy surgery, are: the patient’s written acknowledgement of her understanding that the planned surgery will render her permanently incapable of reproducing; and the physician’s written statement which certifies the medical necessity of that particular surgical procedure. Pre-surgery completion of the relevant documents, required in order to comply with these conditions, is the joint responsibility of the physician and the hospital.

4. That Claimant was made aware of the aforementioned requirements, but has failed to document that it had complied with them, as to either of the subject patient accounts. IDPA’s one-year deadline for Claimant’s submittal of acceptable rebillings of these accounts— demonstrating such compliance — has now past. See Department Rule 4.015, D. R. Exhibit No. R-5.

5. That said Department Rule 4.015 serves to limit the period of time, following rendition of services, during which a medical vendor may correct any errors and deficiencies in its billings of such services to IDPA. As the Claimant has not submitted acceptable billings within the time prescribed, its claims are now ripe for final consideration and adjudication by the Court.

6. That a vendor’s claim to a “vendor payment”, enforceable under section 11 — 13 of the Public Aid Code (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 23, par. 11 — 13), may be “limited by regulations of the Illinois Department”. The above-mentioned regulations (Department Rules) impose requirements which Claimant must meet if it is to receive vendor payments for these patients’ services. Claimant has not met the requirements of such regulations.

*3817. That payment of the subject claims would be contrary to the above-mention regulations.

It is hereby ordered that each of these claims be, and hereby is dismissed.
**Exhibit 23**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board ofDirectors 

Harte-Hanks, Inc.: 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-63105, No. 33-51723, No. 33-54303, No. 333-03045, No. 333-30995, No. 333-41370, No. 333-90022 and No. 333-127993) on Form S-8 ofHarte-Hanks, Inc. of our report dated March 3, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Harte-Hanks, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flowsand stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which report appearsin the December 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of Harte-Hanks, Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

San Antonio, Texas 

March 3, 2010
### §1309. Consultation with Secretary of the Interior; conformity of program with wetlands programs administered by Secretary of the Interior; consultation with and utilization of technical services of appropriate local, State, Federal, and private conservation agencies; coordination of programs

The Secretary shall consult with the Secretary of the Interior and take appropriate measures to insure that the program carried out pursuant to this chapter is in harmony with wetlands programs administered by the Secretary of the Interior. He shall also, insofar as practicable, consult with and utilize the technical and related services of appropriate local, State, Federal, and private conservation agencies to assure coordination of the program with programs of such agencies and a solid technical foundation for the program.

(Pub. L. 91–559, §10, Dec. 19, 1970, 84 Stat. 1471.)
### §410l. Rules and regulations governing reservation rights

Any reservations retained under the provisions of subsections (1) and (2) of section 410j of this title shall be exercised by the owners subject to reasonable rules and regulations which the Secretary may prescribe for the protection of the park, but which shall permit the reserved rights to be exercised so that the oil, gas, and minerals may be explored for, developed, extracted, and removed from the park area in accordance with sound conservation practices. All operations shall be carried on under such regulations as the Secretary may prescribe to protect the land and area for park purposes.

(Pub. L. 85–482, §4, July 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 285.)
§ 1300.10 General. To apply for any highway safety grant under 23 U.S.C. Chapter 4 and Section 1906, a State shall submit electronically and according to the due dates in §§ 1300.11 and 1300.12— ( a ) A triennial Highway Safety Plan meeting the requirements of this subpart; and
( b ) An annual grant application.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Luis Narvaez, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 914]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bangs County (Guzman, J.), rendered January 6, 2005, convicting him of course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree (two counts), rape in the second degree (18 counts), and rape in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

*848Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant’s challenge for cause to a prospective juror, whose former relative was the victim of sexual abuse, since the prospective juror gave an unequivocal assurance that she could be fair and impartial (see *People v Arnold,*96 NY2d 358, 363 [2001]; *People v Nowlin,*297 AD2d 554 [2002]; *People v Cherry,*286 AD2d 913 [2001]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see *People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Adams, J.E, Goldstein, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.
#### § 55.3 Statutory requirements.

The Act's requirements concerning the conduct of elections in languages in addition to English are contained in section 4(f)(4) and section 203(c). These sections state that whenever a jurisdiction subject to their terms “provides any registration or voting notices, forms, instructions, assistance, or other materials or information relating to the electoral process, including ballots, it shall provide them in the language of the applicable language minority group as well as in * * * English. * * *”
Exhibit 32.1





CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Gyrodyne Company of America, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Stephen V. Maroney, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.






Date: March 30, 2010By:
/s/ Stephen V. MaroneyStephen V. Maroney,President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Archibald LAUD-HAMMOND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mark REGER, Individually and as employee of Johnson C. Smith University, Defendant-Appellee, and The Board of Trustees of Johnson C. Smith University, Defendant.

No. 01-2498.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 2002.

Decided May 22, 2002.

Archibald Laud Hammond, Appellant Pro Se. William Porter Farthing, Jr., Stacy Kaplan Wood, John Barnwell Anderson, Parker, Poe, Adams & Bernstein, L.L.P., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Archibald Laud Hammond appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to the Appellee in his discrimination action, dismissing his defamation action, dismissing the Appellee’s employer as a defendant, and denying his motion to amend his complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *Laud-Hammond v. Reger,*No. CA-00-18 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 14, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
### §2410. Jurisdiction of district courts

The district courts of the United States shall have exclusive jurisdiction over any case or controversy arising under the provisions of this chapter or of any regulation prescribed, or permit issued, under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 95–541, §11, Oct. 28, 1978, 92 Stat. 2056.)
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16378-16379]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6818]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the New Mexico Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a planning meeting of 
the New Mexico Advisory Committee to the Commission will be held at the 
Albuquerque Hispano Chamber of Commerce, Lockheed Martin Board Room, 
1309 Fourth Street, SW., Albuquerque, NM 87102 and will convene at 2 
p.m. on Tuesday, March 31, 2011. The purpose of the meeting is for the 
committee to discuss recent Commission and regional activities, discuss 
current civil rights issues in the state and plan future activities. 
The Committee will also be briefed by a representative yet to be 
determined.

[[Page 16379]]

    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the 
comments must be received in the regional office by April 31, 2011. The 
address is Rocky Mountain Regional Office, 999--18th Street, Suite 
1380S, Denver, CO 80202. Comments may be e-mailed to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#294c4b4641465b695c5a4a4a5b074e465f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4e2b2c2126213c0e3b3d2d2d3c60292138">[email protected]</span></a>. 
Records generated by this meeting may be inspected and reproduced at 
the Rocky Mountain Regional Office, as they become available, both 
before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this 
advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Rocky Mountain Regional Office 
at the above e-mail or street address.
    Deaf or hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and 
require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the 
Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled 
date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, March 17, 2011.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2011-6818 Filed 3-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### §459d–6. Aerial gunnery and bombing range agreements of Secretary of the Interior and Secretary of the Navy

The Secretary of the Interior shall enter into such administrative agreements with the Secretary of the Navy as the Secretary of the Navy may deem necessary to assure that the Secretary of the Interior will not exercise any authority granted by sections 459d to 459d–7 of this title so as to interfere with the use by the Department of the Navy of any aerial gunnery or bombing range located in the vicinity of Padre Island.

(Pub. L. 87–712, §7, Sept. 28, 1962, 76 Stat. 652.)
### §412. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act May 15, 1896, ch. 182, §2, 29 Stat. 121; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501, related to camps for military instruction; regulations for militia. Section was restated as section 103302 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs, by Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3165.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

November 13, 2023

____________________________________

IN THE MATTER OF :

:

Tingo Group, Inc. : ORDER OF SUSPENSION

: OF TRADING

File No. 500-1 : 

:

____________________________________:

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that the public interest and the 

protection of investors require a suspension in the trading of the securities of Tingo Group, Inc. 

(“Tingo Group”) (CIK No. 0000854800) because of questions and concerns regarding the 

adequacy and accuracy of publicly available information in the marketplace concerning Tingo 

Group, including (1) press releases, periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange 

Commission—including Forms 10-K, 10-Q, and 8-K—and other publicly disseminated 

statements, since at least May 10, 2022, about the financial statements and business operations of 

its then merger acquisition target and current wholly-owned subsidiary, Tingo Mobile Ltd.; and 

(2) press releases, periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission—including 

Forms 10-K, 10-Q, and 8-K—and other publicly disseminated statements, since at least February 

9, 2023, about the financial statements and business operations of its wholly-owned subsidiary, 

Tingo Foods PLC. 

Tingo Group is a Delaware corporation whose principal place of business is listed as 

Montvale, NJ. The common stock of Tingo Group is traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market 

under the symbol “TIO.” 

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors 

require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Exchange Act, that 

trading in the securities of the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 4:00 a.m.

EST, on November 14, 2023 through 11:59 p.m. EST, on November 28, 2023.

By the Commission.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary
Exhibit 18.1
                     Letter from the Registrant's
             Independent Accountant dated August 12, 2005
             indicating a change in the method of applying
                 accounting practices followed by the
                 Registrant for the fiscal year ended
                            June 3, 2005.



                                  52

<PAGE>


                            August 12, 2005

Board of Directors
Golden Enterprises, Inc. and subsidiary
One Golden Flake Drive
Birmingham, AL 35205

We have audited the  Consolidated  Financial  Statements of Golden  Enterprises,
Inc,  and  subsidiary  as of June 3,  2005 and May 28,  2004 and for each of the
three  years in the  three  year  period  ended  June 3,  2005  incorporated  by
reference  in its  Annual  Report  on Form 10K to the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  and have issued our report  thereon dated August 5, 2005.  Note 3 to
such financial statements describe the Company's adoption during the fiscal year
ended  June 3,  2005 of a  change  in  accounting  policy  for  determining  the
self-insured casualty insurance reserve. In prior years, the case reserve method
of  calculating  this  reserve  was used and in the  current  year,  the Company
adopted the fully developed actuarial method of calculating this reserve,  which
is the  preferred  method  because the fully  developed  method  reflects  costs
inherent in the total  population of claims  including  claims reported and IBNR
(incurred but not reported).  The estimate includes the recognition of inflation
trends and the fact that  injuries  may become  more  severe  over time.  In our
judgment,  such  a  change  is to  an  alternative  accounting  policy  that  is
preferable under the circumstances.



Very truly yours,

Dudley, Hopton-Jones, Sims & Freeman PLLP


                                  53
#### Fred Morgan v. State of Nebraska.

Filed April 2, 1902.

Nos. 12,478 and 12,479.

1. License: Billiard and Pool: Village: Ordinance. Under the provisions of section 46, and subdivision 12 of section 69, article 1, chapter 14, Compthed Statutes, 1901, village authorities have ample power by ordinance to license and regulate billiard and pool rooms.

2. -: -: License Tax. And by subdivision 8 of section 69, aforesaid, village trustees are authorized to raise general revenue by levying and collecting a license tax on persons engaged in the business of conducting billiard and pool rooms.

3. Ordinance:. Title. An ordinance whose main object is to license and regulate a business or calling is not wholly void because a provision imposing a small occupation tax is not clearly expressed in its title, as required by section 79 of article 1, chapter 14, Compthed Statutes, 1901.

Error from the district court for Otoe county. Tried below before Jessen, J.

*Affirmed.*

*D. W. Livingston,*for plaintiff in error.

*Cory don Rood,*for the state.

Sullivan, C. J.

These cases were submitted together on the same briefs, and will be disposed of in one opinion. In each case the defendant, Morgan, was convicted of violating a village ordinance, which was clearly intended to regulate and tax the business of keeping a pool and billard room. Under the stipulation of the parties, the validity of the ordinance is the only question properly before us for decision. The first contention of the defendant is that the village authorities in the adoption of the ordinance, attempted to exercise a power which the legislature had not conferred upon them. This contention can not be sustained. The power exercised by the board of trustees is, we think, fairly within the provisions of section 46, and subdivision 12 of section 69, article 1, chapter 14, Compthed Statutes, 1901. *370The interests of peace, good order and public morality require that the billiard and pool room should be conducted according to such rules and standards, and subject to such restrictions, as may be prescribed by the municipal authorities. Such a room is not, we concede, *per se*a nuisance, but without regulation and supervision it is likely to become so anywhere, and in a village it is apt to degenerate into a trysting-place for idlers and a nidus for vice.

But it is insisted that, if the ordinance was an authorized exercise of the police power, the provision imposing an occupation tax, in addition to the license fee, is invalid. Without conceding this proposition, which, on account of the restrictive title of the ordinance, is not free from doubt, we dispose of it by holding that, under the rule established by numerous decisions of this court, the taxing clause may be stricken out without destroying, or affecting in any way, the regulative provisions of the ordinance. *Scott v. Flowers,*61 Nebr., 620; *State v. Stuht,*52 Nebr., 209. See, also, *East Kingston v. Towle,*48 N. H.; 57; *Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. Jones,*149 Ill., 361; *McPherson v. Blacker,*92 Mich., 377; *Grimes v. Eddy,*126 Mo., 168.

The judgment in each case is

Affirmed.
§ 1270.3 Definitions. As used in this part: ( a ) *Alcoholic beverage* means: ( 1 ) Beer, ale, porter, stout, and other similar fermented beverages (including sake or similar products) of any name or description containing one-half of 1 percent or more of alcohol by volume, brewed or produced from malt, wholly or in part, or from any substitute therefor;
( 2 ) Wine of not less than one-half of 1 per centum of alcohol by volume; or
( 3 ) Distilled spirits which is that substance known as ethyl alcohol, ethanol, or spirits of wine in any form (including all dilutions and mixtures thereof from whatever source or by whatever process produced).
( b ) *FHWA* means the Federal Highway Administration.
( c ) *Motor vehicle* means a vehicle driven or drawn by mechanical power and manufactured primarily for use on public highways, but does not include a vehicle operated solely on a rail or rails.
( d ) *NHTSA* means the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
( e ) *Open alcoholic beverage container* means any bottle, can, or other receptacle that: ( 1 ) Contains any amount of alcoholic beverage; and
( 2 ) Is open or has a broken seal or the contents of which are partially removed (regardless of whether it has been closed or resealed).
( f ) *Open container law* means a State law or combination of laws that meets the minimum requirements specified in § 1270.4.
( g ) *Passenger area* means the area designed to seat the driver and passengers while the motor vehicle is in operation and any area that is readily accessible to the driver or a passenger while in their seating positions, including the glove compartment.
( h ) *Public highway or right-of-way of a public highway* means the width between and immediately adjacent to the boundary lines of every way publicly maintained when any part thereof is open to the use of the public for purposes of vehicular travel; inclusion of the roadway and shoulders is sufficient.
( i ) *State* means any of the 50 States, the District of Columbia, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.