alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

(2004/C 78 E/0466)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2966/03

by Brian Simpson (PSE) to the Commission

(8 October 2003)

Subject:   Spanish National Hydrological Plan: the impact of the La Brena dam project on the Iberian lynx and protected raptors

Is the Commission aware of the problems likely to be encountered by the Iberian lynx, the Spanish imperial eagle and other vulnerable species under the Spanish Government's National Hydrological Plan, in particular the La Brena dam project?

Can the Commission outline what plans it has to protect all the species under threat but in particular the Iberian lynx and the Spanish imperial eagle?

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(18 November 2003)

The Commission is aware of the La Breña II dam project in the province of Cordoba, in the Autonomous Community of Andalusia, in the South of Spain.

The Commission has opened an infringement procedure in relation to this project in order to ensure that the Community environmental law is properly applied.

The La Breña II dam project has been the subject of various exchanges of information and meetings between the Commission and the Spanish authorities. It should be noted that the Commission has received wide-ranging information in relation to this matter, from the Spanish authorities and different persons, associations and bodies, who have transmitted their points of view both in favour of and against this project.

It is important to note that, in the framework of this case, the Spanish authorities have asked the opinion of the Commission pursuant to Article 6.4 of Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992, on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (1). The Commission is currently examining this request. It is foreseen that the Commission will shortly deliver its opinion in relation to this project.

----

(1)OJ L 206, 22.7.1992.

----
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed March 11, 2015.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

Nos. 3D14-97 & 3D13-2705

Lower Tribunal No. 12-4800

________________

Eduardo Fajardo Solache,

Appellant,

vs.

Gabriela Lara Solache,

Appellee.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Gabriela Lara

Ibarra, Judge.

Harvey D. Rogers and Nory Diaz, for appellant.

Nancy A. Hass (Hallandale Beach), for appellee.

Before SUAREZ, EMAS and SCALES, JJ.

EMAS, J.
In this consolidated appeal, Eduardo Fajardo Solache (“former husband”)

seeks review of a final judgment of dissolution of marriage and a post-judgment

order finding him in indirect civil contempt for his failure to pay alimony and child

support as ordered in the dissolution proceedings. 

With one exception, we find no merit in the issues raised by former husband

regarding the final judgment of dissolution, as there was competent substantial

evidence to support the trial court’s findings, and no abuse of discretion has been

shown in the evidentiary rulings or other determinations made by the trial court. 

See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1980).

The one exception is the provision in the final judgment that, upon the child

reaching the age of majority (and the termination of child support payments), the

monthly alimony payments to former wife would automatically increase from

$2,100 to $2,500. The final judgment fails to make any specific factual findings,

or articulate any reason, for such an automatic prospective increase in alimony. 

We conclude it was error to provide for this automatic increase. See Stoler v.

Stoler, 376 So. 2d 253 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Umstead v. Umstead, 620 So. 2d 1074

(Fla. 2d DCA 1993).

With regard to the trial court’s contempt order, we find no error. The final

judgment was predicated upon an affirmative finding of former husband’s ability

to pay the support amount ordered. See Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So. 2d 1274 (Fla.

2
1985). This initial determination, which is supported by competent substantial

evidence, created a presumption of former husband’s ability to pay. Id. at 1278. 

The trial court’s determination, at the contempt hearing, that former husband failed

to overcome this presumption, had the present ability to pay, and failed to comply

with this order, was also supported by competent substantial evidence. 

We therefore affirm the order of civil contempt, and reverse only that

portion of the final judgment providing for an automatic increase in former

husband’s monthly alimony obligation (from $2,100 to $2,500) upon the child

reaching the age of 18. We otherwise affirm the final judgment of dissolution. We

remand for the trial court to amend the final judgment accordingly.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions. 

3
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 171 

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding restoring United States bilateral 

assistance to the West Bank and Gaza. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 11, 2019 

Mr. MERKLEY (for himself, Mr. COONS, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Ms. 

CORTEZ MASTO, and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding restoring United 

States bilateral assistance to the West Bank and Gaza. 

Whereas the dire health and economic conditions facing the 

Palestinian people has created a humanitarian crisis in 

the West Bank and Gaza. The United States has long 

been a leader in helping address the plight of innocent 

civilians; 

Whereas these fragile conditions could contribute to circumstances that would undermine Israel’s security and 

stability in the region; 

Whereas the Palestinian Authority’s interpretation of the 

Anti-Terrorism Clarification Act (Public Law 115–253), 

which sought to help United States victims of terrorism 

abroad, led the Palestinian Authority to reject all forms 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 171 IS 

of United States assistance, meaning that funding for organizations implementing humanitarian aid programs 

that provide critical services, such as health care and 

sanitation to civilians, cannot be carried out; and 

Whereas the Department of State has failed to obligate any 

of the funds Congress appropriated in fiscal year 2017 

and fiscal year 2018, $302,750,000 and $257,500,000, 

respectively, for bilateral assistance to the West Bank 

and Gaza: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that— 

2 (1) the Executive branch should expend before 

3 the end of fiscal year 2019 all bilateral assistance to 

4 the West Bank and Gaza that Congress appro5 priated for such assistance in fiscal year 2018, in6 cluding— 

7 (A) $196,500,000 for the Economic Sup8 port Fund; 

9 (B) $60,000,000 for International Nar10 cotics Control and Law Enforcement; and 

11 (C) $1,000,000 for Nonproliferation, Anti12 Terrorism, Demining and Related Programs; 

13 (2) programs and activities funded by the Eco14 nomic Support Fund as described above are focused 

15 primarily on providing food, essential health services, 

16 and other humanitarian goods and services, and 

17 these expenditures must be consistent with the re18 strictions and exceptions provided in the Taylor 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 171 IS 

1 Force Act (title X of division S of Public Law 115– 

2 141); and 

3 (3) legislation should be enacted to clarify that 

4 programs and activities funded through the Eco5 nomic Support Fund and that are consistent with 

6 the Taylor Force Act (title X of division S of Public 

7 Law 115–141) may not be used as a basis to assert 

8 jurisdiction over the Palestinian Authority pursuant 

9 to the Anti-Terrorism Clarification Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
#### § 115.393 Audits of standards.

The agency shall conduct audits pursuant to §§ 115.401 through 115.405.
EXHIBIT 32







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the quarterly report of New Mexico Software, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned principal executive officer and the principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:August 16, 2010







/s/ Richard F. Govatski


Richard F Govatski, President


(Principal Executive Officer)







/s/ Teresa B. Dickey


Teresa B. Dickey, Treasurer


(Principal Financial Officer)
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Find Upcoming Events 
-  Harvesting Success: Guide To Ag Financing 

# Harvesting Success:  Guide to Ag Financing

###  Date and time 

Monday, April 15, 20249:00 a.m.- 12:00 p.m. EDT

###           Location        

The Core Facility -Room 108142 River TerraceEllijay, GA30540
View Map

### Organizer

                    Vivian Collinsvcollins@georgiasbdc.org706-622-2006

###  Host organization 

UGA Small Business Development Center

###  Type of event 

Resource Partner event

## Event description

Welcome to the Guide to Ag Financing, a course carefully curated to offer attendees a comprehensive introduction to agricultural loan products and the essential steps in preparing for a successful loan application. With agriculture serving as Georgia's primary revenue generator, this program aims to help agricultural producers demystify the loan process. Participants will acquire foundational knowledge in farm planning, the significance of well-prepared financial statements, and the specific criteria agricultural lenders look for in loan approvals. Join us and equip yourself with the knowledge and tools necessary to navigate the intricacies of agricultural financing with confidence!
Register
FY 2018 Service Contract Inventory

Planned Analysis of FY 2019 Inventory

As required by OMB’s FY 2019 Service Contract Inventory Checklist, dated September 

25, 2019, SEC has selected the following PSCs in its FY 2019 inventory. The SEC 

selected three (3) PSCs. None of the selected PSCs were included in the FY 2018

review. 

PSC Product or Service 

Description

Dollars 

Obligated in

FY 2019

Rationale for Selection

R408

Support 

Professional: Program 

Management/Support

$63,380,007.00

PSC selected because it is the 

second biggest spend with 15% 

SEC obligations, and it has not 

been reviewed since 2016. This is 

also a special interest function.

D318

IT And Telecom- Integrated 

Hardware/Software/Services 

Solutions, Predominantly 

Services

$27,078,664.00

PSC selected because it is the 

fourth biggest spend with 7% SEC 

obligations. It has not been 

reviewed since 2016.

R418

Support 

Professional: Legal

$18,200,046.00 PSC selected because it is the 

sixth largest spend with 4% SEC 

obligations. It has not been 

reviewed since 2016.
### §459c–6b. Cooperation with utilities district; land use and occupancy; terms and conditions

The Secretary shall cooperate with the Bolinas Public Utilities District to protect and enhance the watershed values within the seashore. The Secretary may, at his or her discretion, permit the use and occupancy of lands added to the seashore by action of the Ninety-fifth Congress by the utilities district for water supply purposes, subject to such terms and conditions as the Secretary deems are consistent with the purposes of sections 459c to 459c–7 of this title.

(Pub. L. 87–657, §8, as added Pub. L. 95–625, title III, §318(e), Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3487.)
§ 551.16 Marriage ceremony in the institution. ( a ) The Warden may approve the use of institution facilities for an inmate's marriage ceremony. If a marriage ceremony poses a threat to the security or good order of the institution, the Warden may disapprove a marriage ceremony in the institution. The Warden may not delegate the authority to approve or to disapprove a marriage ceremony in the institution below the level of Acting Warden.
( b ) Expenses for a marriage ceremony in the institution shall be paid by the inmate, the inmate's intended spouse, the inmate's family, or other appropriate source approved by the Warden. The Warden may not permit appropriated funds to be used for the marriage ceremony, except for those inherent in providing the place and supervision for the event. Upon request of the inmate, Bureau of Prisons or community clergy, or a justice of the peace may be authorized to assist in a marriage ceremony at the institution. ( 1 ) The marriage ceremony may be performed by Bureau of Prisons or community clergy, or by a justice of the peace.
( 2 ) Because of ecclesiastical constraints, Bureau of Prisons chaplains may decline to perform the marriage ceremony. Upon request of the inmate, a Bureau chaplain will assist that inmate in preparing for an approved marriage; for example, by providing, or arranging for an inmate to receive, pre-nuptial marriage counseling.
( c ) The Warden shall require that a marriage ceremony at the institution be a private ceremony conducted without media publicity.
Case 16-30283-KRH    Doc 28    Filed 11/17/16    Entered 11/17/16 12:07:09    Desc Main Document      Page 1 of 1
#### § 58.5 Non-discrimination in appointment.

The U.S. Trustees shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin or age in appointments to the private panel of trustees or of standing trustees and in this regard shall assure equal opportunity for all appointees and applicants for appointment to the private panel of trustees or as standing trustee. Each U.S. Trustee shall be guided by the policies and requirements of Executive Order 11478 of August 8, 1969, relating to equal employment opportunity in the Federal Government, section 717 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2000e-16), section 15 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended (29 U.S.C. 633a), and the regulations of the Office of Personnel Management relating to equal employment opportunity (5 CFR part 713).

[Order No. 921-80, 45 FR 82631, Dec. 16, 1980, as amended by Order No. 960-81, 46 FR 52360, Oct. 27, 1981]
### §410iii. Purpose

The purpose of this subchapter is to establish the Cedar Creek and Belle Grove National Historical Park in order to—

(1) help preserve, protect, and interpret a nationally significant Civil War landscape and antebellum plantation for the education, inspiration, and benefit of present and future generations;

(2) tell the rich story of Shenandoah Valley history from early settlement through the Civil War and beyond, and the Battle of Cedar Creek and its significance in the conduct of the war in the Shenandoah Valley;

(3) preserve the significant historic, natural, cultural, military, and scenic resources found in the Cedar Creek Battlefield and Belle Grove Plantation areas through partnerships with local landowners and the community; and

(4) serve as a focal point to recognize and interpret important events and geographic locations within the Shenandoah Valley Battlefields National Historic District representing key Civil War battles in the Shenandoah Valley, including those battlefields associated with the Thomas J. (Stonewall) Jackson campaign of 1862 and the decisive campaigns of 1864.

(Pub. L. 107–373, §2, Dec. 19, 2002, 116 Stat. 3104.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 107–373, §1, Dec. 19, 2002, 116 Stat. 3104, provided that: "This Act [enacting this subchapter] may be cited as the 'Cedar Creek and Belle Grove National Historical Park Act'."
#### Robert A. Chesebrough, Appellant, v. The Western Union Telegraph Company, Respondent.

Determination affirmed, with costs. No opin- j ion. Present — Ingraham, P. J.,, McLaughlin, Clarke, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
#### T & B Port Washington, Inc., Doing Business as Mama Sbarro’s, Respondent, v Pamela McDonough et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

[825 NYS2d 524]

In a consolidated action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendants Pamela McDonough, Martha Knowles, and Monfort Trust appeal, as limited by their brief, *786from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J.), entered May 18, 2005, as denied that branch of the motion of the defendant Monfort Trust which was for leave to renew its prior cross motion, among other things, for summary judgment dismissing the action insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the appeal by the defendants Pamela Mc-Donough and Martha Knowles is dismissed, as they are not aggrieved by the order appealed from *(see*CPLR 5511); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from by the defendant Monfort Trust; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff payable by the defendant Monfort Trust.

A motion for leave to renew must be based upon new facts not offered on the prior motion that would change the prior determination and set forth a reasonable justification for the failure to present such facts on the prior motion *(see*CPLR 2221 [e]; *O’Connell v Post,*27 AD3d 631 [2006]). As the facts submitted in support of the motion of the defendant Monfort Trust for leave to renew were merely cumulative of facts submitted on its prior cross motion, inter alia, for summary judgment dismissing the action insofar asserted against it, the Supreme Court providently denied the motion for leave to renew *(see*CPLR 2221 [e] [2]; *Simpson v Cook Pony Farm Real Estate, Inc.,*12 AD3d 496 [2004]). In any event, Monfort Trust failed to set forth a reasonable justification for its failure to present the alleged new facts on its prior motion *(see O’Connell v Post, supra; Renna v Gullo,*19 AD3d 472 [2005]; *Daria v Beacon Capital Co.,*299 AD2d 312 [2002]).

In light of our determination, we need not consider remaining contentions of the Monfort Trust. Miller, J.P, Ritter, Santucci and Lunn, JJ., concur.
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 143 

Recognizing Israeli-American culture and heritage and the contributions of 

the Israeli-American community to the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 4, 2019 

Mr. CRAMER (for himself, Mr. RUBIO, and Mr. CRUZ) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing Israeli-American culture and heritage and the 

contributions of the Israeli-American community to the 

United States. 

Whereas Israeli-Americans are a vibrant immigrant community contributing to the diversity of the United States; 

Whereas Israeli-Americans, including those on college campuses in the United States, have been subject to forms 

of discrimination and desire to connect with their culture 

and celebrate their heritage free from bigotry and bias; 

Whereas the United States is a nation of immigrants, and 

Israeli-Americans contribute invaluable skills that promote the economy and protect the national security of the 

United States; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 143 IS 

Whereas the contributions of Israeli-Americans in the fields 

of astrophysics, mathematics, chemistry, aerospace engineering, biotech, agriculture, and Internet technologies 

have been invaluable to the United States; 

Whereas Israeli-Americans have helped to form a strong bond 

between the people of the United States and the people 

of Israel, reinforcing the shared values and interests between the two countries; and 

Whereas countless Israeli-Americans have enriched the society of the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) affirms that the Israeli-American commu3 nity has contributed immensely to the society and 

4 culture of the United States; and 

5 (2) condemns all forms of discrimination that 

6 aim to marginalize or disenfranchise members of the 

7 Israeli-American community. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
### §410fff–3. Acquisition of property and minor boundary adjustments

#### (a) Additional acquisitions

#### (1) In general

The Secretary may acquire land or interests in land depicted on the Map or the map described in section 410fff–2(a)(2) of this title as proposed additions.

#### (2) Method of acquisition

#### (A) In general

Land or interests in land may be acquired by—

(i) donation;

(ii) transfer;

(iii) purchase with donated or appropriated funds; or

(iv) exchange.

#### (B) Consent

No land or interest in land may be acquired without the consent of the owner of the land.

#### (b) Boundary revision

After acquiring land for the Park, the Secretary shall—

(1) revise the boundary of the Park to include newly-acquired land within the boundary; and

(2) administer newly-acquired land subject to applicable laws (including regulations).

#### (c) Boundary survey

As soon as practicable and subject to the availability of funds the Secretary shall complete an official boundary survey of the Park.

#### (d) Hunting on privately owned lands

#### (1) In general

The Secretary may permit hunting on privately owned land added to the Park under this subchapter, subject to limitations, conditions, or regulations that may be prescribed by the Secretary.

#### (2) Termination of authority

On the date that the Secretary acquires fee ownership of any privately owned land added to the Park under this subchapter, the authority under paragraph (1) shall terminate with respect to the privately owned land acquired.

(Pub. L. 106–76, §5, Oct. 21, 1999, 113 Stat. 1128; Pub. L. 108–128, §2(c), Nov. 17, 2003, 117 Stat. 1355.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2003—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 108–128 substituted "Map or the map described in section 410fff–2(a)(2) of this title" for "Map".
No dejes que los microbios 

se vayan de paseo

Cúbrete la nariz y la boca

al toser y estornudar 

con un pañuelo desechable o con la parte interna del codo. 

Si usas un pañuelo desechable, bótalo a la basura y lávate 

las manos de inmediato.

cdc.gov/coronavirus-es

CS 317831-A julio 30, 2020 1:34 p. m.

Si no puedes lavarte las manos, 

pídele a tu maestro o a otro adulto 

que te den desinfectante de manos
### §3507. Priority of laws

Nothing contained in this chapter shall be construed as indicating an intent on the part of the Congress to change the existing relationship of other Federal laws to the law of a State, or a political subdivision of a State, or to relieve any person of any obligation imposed by any law of any State, or political subdivision of a State. No provision of this chapter shall be construed to invalidate any provision of State or local law unless there is a direct conflict between such provision and the law of the State, or political subdivision of the State, so that the two cannot be reconciled or consistently stand together. This chapter shall in no way be interpreted to interfere with a State's right to protect, rehabilitate, preserve, and restore lands within its established boundary.

(Pub. L. 97–348, §8, Oct. 18, 1982, 96 Stat. 1658.)
Case 15-35788-KRH Doc 1 Filed 11/10/15 Entered 11/10/15 11:31:13 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 6
Case 15-35788-KRH Doc 1 Filed 11/10/15 Entered 11/10/15 11:31:13 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 6
Case 15-35788-KRH Doc 1 Filed 11/10/15 Entered 11/10/15 11:31:13 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 6
Case 15-35788-KRH Doc 1 Filed 11/10/15 Entered 11/10/15 11:31:13 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 6
Case 15-35788-KRH Doc 1 Filed 11/10/15 Entered 11/10/15 11:31:13 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 6
Case 15-35788-KRH Doc 1 Filed 11/10/15 Entered 11/10/15 11:31:13 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 6