alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3452. Resource conservation and development program

The Secretary shall establish a resource conservation and development program under which the Secretary shall provide technical assistance and financial assistance to councils to develop and carry out area plans and projects in designated areas—

(1) to conserve and improve the use of land, develop natural resources, and improve and enhance the social, economic, and environmental conditions in primarily rural areas of the United States; and

(2) to encourage and improve the capability of State,1 units of government, Indian tribes, nonprofit organizations, and councils to carry out the purposes described in paragraph (1).

(Pub. L. 97–98, title XV, §1529, as added Pub. L. 107–171, title II, §2504, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 272.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3452, Pub. L. 97–98, title XV, §1529, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1337, related to definitions, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 107–171.

1 So in original.
# MDE MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1800 WashingtonBoulevard • BaltimoreMD 21230 410-537-3000 • 1-800-633-6101 • www.mde.state.md.us
Martin O'Malley Governor RobertM. Summers,Ph.D. AnthonyG. Brown Lieutenant Governor August 1, 2013

Mr. Shawn M. Garvin Regional Administrator 

### (3RAOO) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region Ill 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia PA 19103-2029 Dear Mr. Garvin: The purpose ofthis letter is to submitthe enclosed State Implementation Plan (SIP) Secretary

Revision 

### # 13-02 containing Maryland's updated Clean Car regulations that reflect the changes made to adoptthe California Low Emissions Vehicle Ill Program. The last update to the Maryland regulations occurred in 2011. This SIP Revision includes amen9ments to Regulation .02 under COMAR 26.11.34 Low Emissions Vehicle Program. Though this package contains all ofthe appropriate California regulations, Maryland is not submitting §2030 Liquefied Petroleum Gas or Natural Gas Retrofit Systems from Division 3, Chapter 1, Article 5 ofTitle 13 ofthe California Code of Regulations, for approval as part of Maryland's SIP. An EmergencyAction forthese amendments became effective on December 31, 2012. The Notice of Proposed Action was published in the Maryland Register on November 30, 2012. A public hearing was held on January3, 2013. The action was adopted on February 6, 2013. The Notice of Final Action was published on February22, 2013 and the action became effective on March 4, 2013. All administrative procedures were properlyfollowed throughout the adoption process. I certifythatthe electronic copy ofthis SIP submittal'(compact disk enclosed) is an exact duplicate of the official hard copy. Ifyou have anyquestions concerning this SIP action, please feel free to call me at (410) 537-3084 or Mr. George (Tad) S. Aburn, Jr

., Director ofthe Air and Radiation Management Administration, at (410) 537-3255.

RMS:dhr Enclosure**~** Recycled Paper www. mde.state.md.us TIY Users 1-800-735-2258 Via Maryland Relay Service
NO. 07-06 -024 1-CR IN THE CO URT OF APPEA LS FO R THE S EVEN TH D ISTRI CT O F TEXAS

AT AM AR ILLO PAN EL C JU LY25, 2007

_________

_________

_________

___ T OMMY JOE VASQ UEZ, APPE LLA NT

V. THE S TATE OF TEXAS, APPEL LEE

_________

_________

_________

______ FRO M T HE 12 1 DIS T RI CT COU RT OF T ER RY COU NT Y; ST NO . 542 8; H ON ORABLE KELLY G. M OOR E, J UD GE

_________

_________

_________

____ Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRT LE, JJ. ME MO RA ND UM OPI NI ON Appel lan t pl eaded g uil ty to the o ffense of sex ual as saul t of a c hil d and w as sent enced to tw enty

ye ars. Appe ll ant’ s p lea w as entered after the tr ial co urt had ov er ru led a moti on to su ppress appel lan t’ s w ri tten sta tement. The tr ial co urt c erti fied appe ll ant’ s r ig ht to a pp ea l t he d en i al o f t he mo ti on t o s up pres s h i s w r i tt en s ta te me nt
. W e affi r m. A p p e ll a n t ’s a tt o rn e y h a s f il e d a n A n d e rs b ri e f a n d a m o t io n t o wit h d ra w. A n d e rs v. Cal ifor nia , 386 U .S. 738, 87 S. Ct . 139 6, 18 L.E d. 2d 498 ( 1967)
. In s uppor t of hi s mot ion to w it hdraw , c ounse l cer ti fies that he has di li g entl y rev iewed the record, an d i n hi s o pin ion ,In grant ing counse l’s motion to w ithd ra w, h owev er, w e rem ind cou nsel to insure 1 that he has co mpli ed w it h the “educa ti onal ” duty to infor m appel lan t of hi s r ig ht t o fil e a pro se peti ti on for dis creti onar y rev iew i n the C our

t of C ri minal Appeal s. Ex par te Ow ens, 206 S.W .3d 670 (Tex.Crim.App . 200 6). 2 the record reflect s n o rev ersi ble er ro r upon w hic h an appeal ca n be predi cat ed. Id. at 74 4- 45. In compl ian ce w it h Hig h v . State, 573 S.W .2d 807, 813 ( Tex .C ri m.App. 1978) , c ounse l has candi dly

di sc uss ed w hy , under the cont ro ll ing author it ies , t here i s n o er ro r in the t ri al cour t’ s j udg ment. Addi ti onal ly , c ounse l has cer ti fied that he has prov ide d appel lan t a copy of the Anders b ri ef and moti on to w it hdraw and appropr iat ely

adv is ed appe ll ant o f his r ig ht to fil e a pro se respon se in thi s matter . Staffo rd v . St ate, 813 S. W .2d 5 03, 5 10 (Tex .Crim .A pp. 1 991)
. The cour t has al so adv is ed appe ll ant o f his r ig ht t o fil e a pro se re spons e. Appel lan t has not filed a respon se. By his And ers brief , coun sel raises groun ds tha t could possibly support an app eal, but c oncl udes the a ppeal i s fr ivolo us. W e h av e rev iewed th ese g ro unds and made an inde pen den t rev iew

of the en tire record to de term ine w het her t h e re a re any arg uab le g ro unds w hic h mi g ht s uppor t an appeal
. See Pens on v . O hio , 488 U .S. 75, 1 09 S. Ct . 346 , 1 0 2 L
. E d
. 2 d 3 0 0 ( 1 9 8 8 ) ; B l e d s o e v . S t a t e , 1 7 8 S
. W
. 3 d 8 2 4 ( Te x . C r i m. A p p . 2005)
. W e have foun d no such arguab le groun ds and agree w ith cou nsel th at th e ap pea l is f riv olou s. Accordin gly , coun sel’s mo tion to w ithdra w is here by grant ed and the trial co urt’s 1 jud g ment i s a ff ir med. Mackey K. Hancock Justice Do not p ubl is h.
### §4306. Prohibited acts and criminal penalties

#### (a) Prohibited acts

(1) Any person who, without prior authorization from the Secretary knowingly destroys, disturbs, defaces, mars, alters, removes or harms any significant cave or alters the free movement of any animal or plant life into or out of any significant cave located on Federal lands, or enters a significant cave with the intention of committing any act described in this paragraph shall be punished in accordance with subsection (b).

(2) Any person who possesses, consumes, sells, barters or exchanges, or offers for sale, barter or exchange, any cave resource from a significant cave with knowledge or reason to know that such resource was removed from a significant cave located on Federal lands shall be punished in accordance with subsection (b).

(3) Any person who counsels, procures, solicits, or employs any other person to violate any provisions of this subsection shall be punished in accordance with section 1 (b).

(4) Nothing in this section shall be deemed applicable to any person who was in lawful possession of a cave resource from a significant cave prior to November 18, 1988.

#### (b) Punishment

The punishment for violating any provision of subsection (a) shall be imprisonment of not more than one year or a fine in accordance with the applicable provisions of title 18, or both. In the case of a second or subsequent violation, the punishment shall be imprisonment of not more than 3 years or a fine in accordance with the applicable provisions of title 18, or both.

(Pub. L. 100–691, §7, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4549.)

1 So in original. Probably should be "subsection".
<PAGE>   1


                                                                     Exhibit 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Great Lakes Chemical Corporation of our report dated February 26, 1999,
included in the 1998 Annual Report to Stockholders of Great Lakes Chemical
Corporation.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Great Lakes
Chemical Corporation listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility
of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based
on our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to
above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth
therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
Number 33-02069 on Form S-3, dated December 11, 1985, in Post-Effective
Amendment Number 1 to the Registration Statement Number 33-02074 on Form S-8,
dated February 3, 1995, in Registration Statement Number 33-02075 on Form S-8,
dated December 11, 1985, in Registration Statement Number 33-42477 on Form S-3,
dated August 28, 1991, in Registration Statement Number 33-57589 on Form S-8,
dated February 3, 1995, in Registration Statement Number 33-300543 on Form S-8,
dated January 30, 1996, in Registration Statement Number 333-49127 on Form S-8
dated April 1, 1998, and in Registration Statement Number 333-61609 on Form S-8,
dated August 17, 1998, of our report dated February 26, 1999, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements incorporated herein by reference, and our
report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the financial
statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Great Lakes
Chemical Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1998.

/s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana
March 26, 1999
<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report of Analex
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), we, Sterling E. Phillips, Jr. and Ronald B. Alexander, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



November 6, 2003


/s/ Sterling E. Phillips, Jr.
-------------------------------------------
Sterling E. Phillips, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Ronald B. Alexander
-------------------------------------------
Ronald B. Alexander
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Each of the undersigned officers of American Realty Investors, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
Company) hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



| | (i) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2009, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company, at and for the periods indicated.
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                                                                    
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 14, 2009 |  | /s/ Daniel J. Moos                                                                 
|                       |  | Daniel J. Moos                                                                     
|                       |  | President and Chief Operating Officer                                              
|                       |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                                                      
|                       | 
|Dated: August 14, 2009 |  | /s/ Gene S. Bertcher                                                               
|                       |  | Gene S. Bertcher                                                                   
|                       |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
§ 541.4 Loss of good conduct sentence credit as a mandatory sanction. ( a ) You will lose good conduct sentence credit as a mandatory disciplinary sanction if you are in one of the following two groups: ( 1 ) *VCCLEA-violent inmates.* The date of your U.S. Code offense was on or after September 13, 1994, but before April 26, 1996, and you committed a “crime of violence” as defined by the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (VCCLEA); or
( 2 ) *PLRA inmates and DC Code offenders.* The date of your U.S. Code offense was on or after April 26, 1996, and, therefore, under the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), or the date of your District of Columbia (DC) Code offense was on or after August 5, 2000.
( b ) If you are an inmate in one of the above groups and commit a prohibited act, you will lose good conduct sentence credit as a mandatory disciplinary sanction. The amount of good conduct sentence credit you will lose depends on the severity level of the prohibited act(s) committed, as follows: ( 1 ) *Greatest Severity Level Offenses.* You will lose at least 41 days, or 75% of available credit if less than 54 days are available for the prorated period, for each act committed.
( 2 ) *High Severity Level Offenses.* You will lose at least 27 days, or 50% of available credit if less than 54 days are available for the prorated period, for each act committed.
( 3 ) *Moderate Severity Level Offenses.* You will lose at least 14 days, or 25% of available credit if less than 54 days are available for the prorated period, after committing two or more Moderate severity acts during the current year of your good conduct sentence credit availability.
( 4 ) *Low Severity Level Offenses.* You will lose at least 7 days, or 12.5% of available credit if less than 54 days are available for the prorated period, after committing three or more Low severity acts during the current year of your good conduct sentence credit availability.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEvolution of a Planar Wake in Adverse Pressure GradientIn the interest of improving the predictability of high-lift systems at maximum lift conditions, a series of fundamental experiments were conducted to study the effects of adverse pressure gradient on a wake flow. Mean and fluctuating velocities were measured with a two-component laser-Doppler velocimeter. Data were obtained for several cases of adverse pressure gradient, producing flows ranging from no reversed flow to massively reversed flow. While the turbulent Reynolds stresses increase with increasing size of the reversed flow region, the gradient of Reynolds stress does not. Computations using various turbulence models were unable to reproduce the reversed flow.Document ID20160011108Acquisition SourceAmes Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsDriver, David M.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)*Mateer, George G.*(MCAT Inst. Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2016Publication DateFebruary 1, 2016Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberARC-E-DAA-TN29325NASA/TM-2016-219068Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.KeywordsWakeTurbulenceSeparationAvailable DownloadsNameType20160011108.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 75 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 75

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
               relative to the fundamental right to vote.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 4, 2020

  Mr. Durbin (for himself, Ms. Warren, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Merkley, Ms. 
Hirono, Mr. Markey, Mr. Van Hollen, and Mr. Blumenthal) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
               relative to the fundamental right to vote.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Every citizen of the United States, who is of legal 
voting age, shall have the fundamental right to vote in any public 
election held in the jurisdiction in which the citizen resides.
    ``Section 2. The fundamental right of citizens of the United States 
to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any 
State or political subdivision within a State unless such denial or 
abridgment is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest and 
is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling 
governmental interest.
    ``Section 3. The portion of section 2 of the fourteenth article of 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States that consists of the 
phrase `or other crime,' is repealed.
    ``Section 4. The Congress shall have the power to enforce this 
article and protect against any denial or abridgement of the 
fundamental right to vote by legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
### §458a. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, act Aug. 27, 1940, ch. 690, §1, 54 Stat. 861, related to mats for reproduction in magazines and newspapers of photographs of scenery. See section 104905 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.10.1

                               GIANT GROUP, LTD.
                             9000 Sunset Boulevard
                         Los Angeles, California 90069

                                                               December 11, 1998


Mr. Glenn Sands
2 Rio Vista Drive
Alpine, NJ 07620

Dear Mr. Sands:

     Reference is made to a letter wherein you have agreed to indemnify
Periscope Sportswear, Inc. for certain taxes, a copy of which is annexed hereto
(the "Letter").

     Reference is also hereby made to a promissory note made by you and payable
to Periscope in the principal amount of $2,606,000, a copy of which is annexed
hereto (the "Note").

     GIANT Group, Ltd. and Periscope Sportswear, Inc. hereby agree with you that
if you are required to make any indemnification payment (a "Payment") pursuant
to the Letter prior to December 31, 1999, then, and in such event, the Note
shall be deemed amended to provide that (a) the principal amount payable on
December 31, 1999 shall be reduced by the lesser of (i) the amount of such
Payment made by you or (ii) $2,002,000 (the "Deferred Amount") and (b) the
principal amount due on December 31, 2000 shall be increased by such Deferred
Amount.

     Except to the extent specifically provided for herein, the terms and
conditions of the Note shall remain in full force and effect.

                                   Sincerely,

                                   GIANT GROUP, LTD.


                                   By: David Gotterer - Vice Chairman
                                      ----------------------------------------

                                   PERISCOPE SPORTSWEAR, INC.

                                   By: Scott Pianin - V P
                                      ----------------------------------------

Agreed to and Accepted:


/s/ Glenn Sands
-----------------------
Glenn Sands
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of-- L&M Electric & Plumbing, LLC Under Contract No. N00189-11-C-Zl 14 APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 59889

Donald C. Holmes, Esq.

Paxton Law Group, LLP Washington, DC Ronald J. Borro, Esq.

Navy ChiefTrial Attorney Robyn L. Hamady, Esq.

Trial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 21 October 2015

Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59889, Appeal ofL&MElectric & Plumbing, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREYD. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
### §410oo–6. Authorization of appropriations

There are hereby authorized to be appropriated not to exceed $12,000,000 to carry out land acquisition and development as authorized in this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 100–479, §7, Oct. 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 2327; Pub. L. 115–31, div. G, title I, §119, May 5, 2017, 131 Stat. 462.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2017—Pub. L. 115–31 inserted "land acquisition and development as authorized in" after "carry out".
#### § 42.608 Agency action on complaints dismissed by EEOC.

Upon EEOC's transmittal of a dismissal under § 42.607 of this regulation, the referring agency shall determine within thirty days, what, if any, action the agency intends to take with respect to the complaint and then notify the complainant and the recipient. In reaching that determination, the referring agency shall give due weight to EEOC's determination that the title VII allegations of the joint complaint should be dismissed. If the referring agency decides to take action with respect to a complaint that EEOC has dismissed for lack of reasonable cause to believe that title VII has been violated, the agency shall notify the Assistant Attorney General and the Chairman of the EEOC in writing of the action it plans to take and the basis of its decision to take such action.
### SUBCHAPTER LIX–B—WAR IN THE PACIFIC NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK