N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT JOSEPH L. M IZZONI, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. DEB R A B R OOKS; e t a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 12-17779 D.C . No. 3:11-c v-00632-LRHW GC M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ne v a da Larry R . Hic ks, Distric t Judge , Pre s iding Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 19, 2013 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, TR OTT, a nd THOM AS, C irc uit Judge s. C a lifornia sta te prisone r Jose ph L. M iz z oni a ppe a l s pro se from

the distric t c ourt’ s dismissa l orde r an d sum m ary judgm e nt in his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c tion a lle ging de libe rate indiffe re nc e , re t a lia tion, a nd othe r c l a im s. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie wde novo both a dism issa l unde r 28 U.S.C .



# FIL ED D EC 10 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).§1915(A), Re snic k v . Hay e s , 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th C ir. 2000), a nd sum m ary judgm e nt, Toguc hi v . C

hung , 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th C ir. 2004). W e m ay a ffirm on a ny ground supporte d by

the re c ord. J

ohnson v . Riv e rside

He a l thc areSy

s., LP , 534 F.3d 1116, 1121 (9th C ir. 2008). W e a ffirm . Dism issa l of M iz z oni’ s de libe rate indiffe re nc e c la i m re late d to unsa

nita ry c onditions in his c e l l wa s prope r be c a use , by a lle ging tha

t prison offic ia ls c le ane d his c e ll to thebe st of the ir a bility a fte r he c om

p la ine d, M i z z oni e sse ntia lly c onc e de d tha

t de fe nda nts did not know of or c onsc iously disre g ard a

se rious risk to M iz z oni a rising from an unc le an c e ll. Se e Farme r v . Bre nnan , 511 U.S. 825, 835- 37 (1994) (se tting forth sta nda rd for de libe rate indiffe re nc e , a nd sta ting tha t prison offic ia ls c annot be lia

ble unle ss the y

know of a

n d disre ga

rd an e xc e ssive risk to inm ate he a l th or sa fe ty ); Toguc hi , 391 F.3d at 1057-58 (ne glige n c e is not suffic ie n t to sta te a de libe rate indiffe re nc e c la im ). The distric t c ourt prope rly dism isse d M iz z oni’ s de libe rate indiffe re nc e c la im re late d to de l a

y in the tre atm e nt of his ge nita l ra sh be c a use M iz z oni fa ile d to a lle g e fa c t s showing tha

t the de la y re s ulte d in furthe r signific ant injury or the wa nton inflic tion of pa in, a

nd be c a use M iz z oni’ s disa gre e m e nt a bout thepre sc ribe d ointm e n ts doe s not giverise to a n Eighth Ame ndm e nt viola tion. Se e Halle tt v . Morgan , 296 F.3d 732, 745-46 (9th C ir. 2002) (de la y in providing c are doe s not 1 2 - 1 7 7 7 9 2c onstitute

de libe rate indiffe re nc e unle ss inm ate suffe rs signific ant ha rm a s a re sult); Toguc hi , 391 F.3d a t 1058 (inm ate ’ s disa gre e m e nt with phy sic i an re ga rding his tre atm e nt doe s not a m ount to de libe rate indiffe re nc e ). The distric t c ourt prope rly grante d sum

m a ry judgm e nt on M iz z o ni’ s re ta lia tion c la im be c a use M i z z oni fa i le d to ra ise a ge nuine disputeof m ate ria l fa c t a s to whe the r de fe nda

nts a c t e d with re ta lia

tory inte nt in tra

nsfe rring him

to the prison’ s m e nta l h e a lth infirm a ry for obse rvation on two oc c a sions, or tha t the ir a c tions fa ile d to re a s ona

bly a dva nc e le gitim ate c orre c t iona l goa ls. S e e Rhode s v . Robinson , 408 F.3d 559, 567-68 (9th C ir. 2004) (se tting forth e le m e n t s of re ta lia tion c la im in the prison c o nte xt). W e do not c onside r M iz z on’ s a rgum e nt, ra ise d for the first tim e on a ppe a l, re ga rding thea lle g e dly e rrone o us pa ym e nt of his filing fe e s from a “ m one y gift c oupon” in his inmate trust a c c ount. Se e Padge tt v . W right , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th C ir. 2009) (pe r c uriam ). AFFIRM E D.

1 2 - 1 7 7 7 9 3