alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Compliance Report on Implementation of the Plain Writing Act of 2010

April 10, 2024

Summary of steps taken by the SEC to implement the Plain Writing Act of 2010 (Act):

• Lori J. Schock, Director, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, was

designated as the Senior Agency Official responsible for plain writing.

• The agency created a designated webpage about the SEC’s Plain Writing Initiative 

at http://www.sec.gov/plainwriting.shtml.

• The agency created an email box for public comments on the SEC’s plain writing 

efforts at PlainWriting@sec.gov. 

• The agency provided information on the requirements of the Act to SEC staff 

agency-wide and posted the information on the SEC’s intranet.

• From April 1, 2023, through March 31, 2024, the SEC offered 25 different courses 

to SEC staff that included a “plain language” component, and over 630 SEC staff 

completed the training. 

• The agency posted training materials about plain writing from PLAIN and other 

government agencies on the SEC’s intranet.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-60193

Summary Calendar

DANIEL GIRMAI NEGUSIE,

Petitioner

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent

On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States

(A15 575 924)

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

In Negusie v. Holder, 555 U.S. ___ (2009), the Supreme Court of the United

States reversed our judgment in this case, which affirmed the judgment of the

Board of Immigration Appeals. The Court remanded with instructions for the

Board to interpret the relevant statute, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42), consistent with

its opinion. The judgment of the Board is therefore VACATED, and the case is

remanded to it for further proceedings consistent with the Court’s opinion.

VACATED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 13, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
#### Dennis Culliner *v.*John H. Nash.

1. Bill of *exceptions—must show all the evidence—when.*Where a bill of exceptions fails to state that it contains all the evidence, this court will not examine to see if that which appears in the record does sustain the verdict.

2. *Same—making of, a judicial act.*The malting of a bill of exceptions is a judicial act, and can not be delegated. Therefore a certificate of one styling himself “reporter,” that the bill contains all the evidence, will not be considered. The judge alone can certify to such fact.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Mason county; the Hon. Lyman Lacey, Judge, presiding.

This was an action of assumpsit, brought by John H. Nash against Dennis Culliner, upon a promissory note. The plaintiff recovered judgment, and the defendant appealed.

Messrs. Fullerton & Rogers, for the appellant.

Messrs. Dearborn & Campbell, and Mr. John W. Pit-man, for the appellee.

Mr. Justice Scholfield

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The questions discussed by appellant depend entirely upon what the evidence was in the court below. It has been many times declared by this court, that where the bill of exceptions fails to state that it contains all the evidence, we will not examine to see whether that which appears in the record does sustain the verdict. The bill of exceptions in this record fails to state that it contains all the evidence given on the trial. There is a certificate to that effect, signed by one Watson, who styles himself “reporter.” We are aware of no law authorizing such a certificate to be accepted by us, in lieu of *516the proper statement in the bill of exceptions, signed by the judge. We have no doubt that this individual may be a man of truth and respectability, still the law gives him no power to usurp the province of the judge, and certify to us what evidence was given. If the judge knew that the evidence, as taken down by the reporter, was correctly reported and copied in the bill of exceptions, it was for him and not the reporter to so certify. The making of the bill of exceptions is a judicial act, and it can, not be delegated. *Emerson*v. *Clark,*2 Scam. 489.

The judgment is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
### §460jjj. Establishment

#### (a) In general

In order to conserve, protect, and restore the recreational, ecological, cultural, religious, and wildlife resource values of the Jemez Mountains, there is hereby established the Jemez National Recreational Area (hereinafter in this subchapter referred to as the "recreation area"), to be administered by the Secretary of Agriculture (hereinafter in this subchapter referred to as the "Secretary").

#### (b) Area included

The recreation area shall be comprised of approximately 57,000 acres of lands and interests in lands within the Santa Fe National Forest as generally depicted on the map entitled "Jemez National Recreation Area—Proposed" and dated September 1992. The map shall be on file and available for public inspection in the offices of the Chief of the Forest Service, Department of Agriculture, Washington, District of Columbia. The Secretary may from time to time, in consultation with local tribal leaders, make minor revisions in the boundary of the recreation area to promote management effectiveness and efficiency in furtherance of the purposes of this subchapter.

#### (c) Map and description

As soon as practicable after October 12, 1993, the Secretary shall file a map and legal description of the recreation area with the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives and with the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources and the Committee on Indian Affairs of the Senate. Such map and legal description shall have the same force and effect as if included in this subchapter, except that correction of clerical and typographical errors in such legal description and map may be made. Such map and legal description shall be on file and available for public inspection in the Office of the Chief of the Forest Service, Department of Agriculture.

#### (d) No additional lands

No lands or interests therein outside of the boundaries of the recreation area may be added to the recreation area without specific authorization by Congress.

(Pub. L. 103–104, §1, Oct. 12, 1993, 107 Stat. 1025; Pub. L. 103–437, §6(q), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4587.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 103–437 in first sentence struck out "Select" before "Committee on Indian Affairs".
### §1826f. Certification

The Secretary of State shall determine in writing prior to the signing or provisional application by the United States of any international agreement with respect to the conservation and management of living marine resources or the use of the high seas by fishing vessels that the prohibition contained in section 1826d of this title will not be violated if such agreement is signed or provisionally applied.

(Pub. L. 104–43, title VI, §605, Nov. 3, 1995, 109 Stat. 392.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection Act, and also as part of the Fisheries Act of 1995, and not as part of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act which comprises this chapter.
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.9.2


                                   AGREEMENT
                               REGARDING MATTERS
                                    BETWEEN
                            INTEK INFORMATION, INC.
                                      AND
                           SPIDER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


     This Agreement is entered into by and between Intek Information, Inc.
("Intek") and Spider Technologies, Inc. ("Spider").


     The parties entered into various agreements in respect of the spin off of
Spider from Intek.

     1.   In consideration of the entering into, delivery and performance of the
     Amended and Restated Software Assignment and Grant-Back License,
     Maintenance and Support Agreement between the parties hereto, Intek hereby
     agrees to pay Spider $75,000 in readily available funds within one hundred
     twenty (120) days of the date hereof plus, at such time, the actual cost of
     any third party licenses acquired by Intek from Spider in the twenty (20)
     days after the date of execution hereof.

     2.   The parties each represent and warrant to the other that they have
          obtained all necessary authorizations, corporate and other, to enter
          into, deliver and perform this Agreement.

DATED:  January 13, 2000

     INTEK INFORMATION, INC.

     By: /s/ Timothy C. O'Crowley
         ------------------------
     Title: Chief Executive Officer
            -----------------------

     SPIDER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

     By: /s/ Timothy C. O'Crowley
         ------------------------
     Title: Appointed signatory
            -------------------
### §460q–3. Administration; land and water use management plans, preparation and revision; utilization of statutory authorities

(a) Each Secretary is authorized and directed to administer the portion of the recreation area under his jurisdiction in a manner coordinated with the other purposes of the Central Valley project and with the purposes of the recreation area as a whole and in such manner as in his judgment will best provide for (1) public outdoor recreation benefits; (2) conservation of scenic, scientific, historic, and other values contributing to public enjoyment; and (3) such management, utilization, and disposal of renewable natural resources as in the judgment of the respective Secretary will promote or is compatible with, and does not significantly impair, public recreation and conservation of scenic, scientific, historic, or other values contributing to public enjoyment. Such administration shall be carried out under land and water use management plans which each Secretary shall prepare and may from time to time revise in consultation with the other.

(b) In the administration of the portion of the recreation area under his jurisdiction—

(1) the Secretary of Agriculture shall utilize statutory authorities relating to the national forests in such manner as he deems appropriate to carry out the purposes of this subchapter; and

(2) the Secretary of the Interior may utilize such statutory authorities relating to areas of the national park system and such statutory authority otherwise available to him for the conservation and development of natural resources as he deems appropriate to carry out the purposes of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 89–336, §4, Nov. 8, 1965, 79 Stat. 1298.)
#### § 61.11 Environmental information.

Interested persons may contact the Land and Natural Resources Division for information regarding Department Justice compliance with NEPA.
### §459g–3. Hunting and fishing provisions

The Secretary shall permit hunting and fishing, including shellfishing, on lands, marshlands, and waters under his jurisdiction within the Cape Lookout National Seashore in accordance with the laws of the State of North Carolina and the United States, to the extent applicable, except that the Secretary may designate zones where, and establish periods when, no hunting or fishing shall be permitted for reasons of public safety, administration, fish or wildlife management, or public use and enjoyment. Except in emergencies, any rules and regulations of the Secretary pursuant to this section shall be put into effect only after consultation with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and the North Carolina Department of Conservation and Development.

(Pub. L. 89–366, §4, Mar. 10, 1966, 80 Stat. 35.)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Administrative Proceedings Rulings

Release No. 6826 / August 16, 2021

Administrative Proceeding

File No. 3-20454

In the Matter of

Kimberly D. Butler,

Prosperity Economics Partners, 

LLC, and

Partners for Prosperity, LLC

Order Scheduling 

Prehearing Conference

I ORDER that a telephonic prehearing conference be held on September 

8, 2021, at 3:00 p.m. EDT (2:00 p.m. CDT). The Division of Enforcement should 

arrange for a court reporter and provide dial-in instructions in advance of the 

conference.

Before the prehearing conference, the parties must confer and discuss the 

subjects listed in Rule of Practice 221(c), 17 C.F.R. § 201.221(c). The parties 

must submit by September 3, 2021, a joint letter summarizing the result of 

their discussion and proposing the procedures for resolving this proceeding, 

including proposed deadlines. If the parties are unable to reach agreement 

about proposed procedures and deadlines, their letter should describe their 

disagreements.

/s/ James E. Grimes

Administrative Law Judge
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11

                   HILTON HOTELS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                      COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS(1)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                          1996           1995          1994
                                                      ------------  -----------   ------------
<S>                                                   <C>           <C>           <C>
Income (in millions)
     Before extraordinary item                                $156         $173           $122
     Deduct dividends on preferred shares                        -            -              -
                                                      ------------  -----------   ------------
     Income applicable to common stock
       before extraordinary item                               156          173            122
     Extraordinary item, net                                   (74)           -              -
                                                      ------------  -----------   ------------
     Income applicable to common stock                         $82         $173           $122
                                                      ------------  -----------   ------------
                                                      ------------  -----------   ------------
Shares
     Shares outstanding January 1                      193,348,712  192,458,892    191,387,416
     Stock option - weighted average exercises             177,702       74,152         89,936
     Weighted average shares issued                      1,860,359            -              -
     Outstanding when market price exceeds
      exercise price at ends of periods                 10,331,635    5,469,300      4,882,240
     Less shares assumed purchased with proceeds        (8,575,719)  (3,909,872)    (3,222,220)
                                                      ------------  -----------   ------------
     Common and common equivalent shares               197,142,689  194,092,472    193,137,372
                                                      ------------  -----------   ------------
                                                      ------------  -----------   ------------
Earnings per common share
     Income before extraordinary item                        $0.79        $0.89          $0.63
     Extraordinary item                                      (0.38)           -              -
                                                      ------------  -----------   ------------
     Net income                                              $0.41        $0.89          $0.63
                                                      ------------  -----------   ------------
                                                      ------------  -----------   ------------
</TABLE>
(1)  All periods restated to give effect to 4 for 1 common stock split in
     September 1996.
### subpart a—general provisions
Cu CH3OCH3(CH2)11-OH + CH3(CH2)13-OH + CH3-NH2→H-N-R + CH2-CH2→H253.9% 23.1% 23%24.5% 75.5%539 kg/bt 231 kg/bt 230 kg/bt245 kg/bt 755 kg/btCH3CH3|| +HO-[ CH2-CH2-O ]14CH2-CH2-N-R + CH3Cl→HO-[-CH2-CH2-O-]14-CH2-CH2-N-R Cl-|94.7% 5.3%CH3947 kg/bt 53 kg/bt1000 kg/bt1-DodecanolCAS 112-53-8MethanamineCAS 74-89-5N-methyl-C12-14-(evennumbered)-alkyl-1-amineCAS 1335203-22-9Isolated IntermediateEthylene oxideCAS 75-21-8Methyl chlorideCAS 74-87-3C12-14 alkylmethylamineethoxylateCAS unknownIsolated IntermediateQuaternary ammonium compounds, C12-14- alkyl (hydroxyethyl)dimethyl, ethoxylated, chloridesCASRN 1554325-20-0Where R= C12-14 alkylPMN Imported Chemical Substance1-TetradecanolCAS 112-72-1
#### Western New York and Pennsylvania Traction Company, Appellant, v. The Erie Railroad Company and Buffalo, Bradford and Pittsburgh Railroad Company, Respondents.

Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon stipulation filed.
### §450ii–1. Excluded lands opened to entry under mining laws

All public-domain lands included before September 25, 1950, within the Joshua Tree National Monument which are eliminated from the National Monument by sections 450ii to 450ii–3 of this title are opened to location, entry, and patenting under the United States mining laws: Provided, That such public-domain lands or portions thereof shall be restored to application and entry under other applicable public land laws, including the mineral leasing laws.

(Sept. 25, 1950, ch. 1030, §2, 64 Stat. 1035.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Abolition of Joshua Tree National Monument

Joshua Tree National Monument abolished and incorporated in Joshua Tree National Park, see section 410aaa–22 of this title.
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 228 

Supporting measures taken by the Government of Taiwan to deter, or if 

so compelled, defeat, aggression by the Government of the People’s 

Republic of China. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 4, 2019 

Mr. HAWLEY (for himself, Mr. COTTON, and Mr. RUBIO) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting measures taken by the Government of Taiwan 

to deter, or if so compelled, defeat, aggression by the 

Government of the People’s Republic of China. 

Whereas the Government of the People’s Republic of China 

has reaffirmed its intent to seize control of Taiwan, including by force; 

Whereas, on May 28, 2019, Taiwan conducted the annual 

Han Kuang Exercise, demonstrating the ability of Taiwanese forces to defend against invasion and other military threats; 

Whereas, in May 2019, United States and Taiwanese national security advisors met in Washington for the first 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 228 IS 

time since Taiwan and the United States ended formal 

diplomatic ties in 1979; 

Whereas the Government of Taiwan has gone to great 

lengths to cooperate and build relations with the Government of the United States and other nations; and 

Whereas the United States and Taiwan have continued to 

strengthen their relationship, even as the Government of 

the People’s Republic of China has intensified its threats 

against the Government of Taiwan: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) reaffirms and encourages strengthening of 

3 United States-Taiwanese relations; 

4 (2) condemns threats by the Government of the 

5 People’s Republic of China against the Government 

6 of Taiwan, including— 

7 (A) continued rhetoric that could insinuate 

8 an attack on the people or the Government of 

9 Taiwan; 

10 (B) military exercises demonstrating intent 

11 to invade or otherwise attack Taiwan; and 

12 (C) propaganda used by the Government of 

13 the People’s Republic of China; 

14 (3) applauds the Government of Taiwan’s adop15 tion of the Overall Defense Concept; 

16 (4) urges the Government of Taiwan to con17 tinue development of a more lethal and resilient deVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:00 Jun 05, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR228.IS SR228

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 228 IS 

1 fensive posture in accordance with the new Overall 

2 Defense Concept; and 

3 (5) calls on the governments of all nations to 

4 support a strong, prosperous, and democratic Tai5 wan as part of a shared commitment to the security 

6 and stability of the Indo-Pacific region. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
### §410ww–4. Administration

#### (a) In general

The park shall be administered in accordance with this subchapter and with the provisions of law generally applicable to units of the National Park System, including, but not limited to, the Act entitled "An Act to establish a National Park Service, and for other purposes", approved August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535; 16 U.S.C. 1–4).1

#### (b) Donations

The Secretary may accept donations of funds, property, or services from individuals, foundations, corporations, and other private entities, and from public entities, for the purposes of managing the park.

#### (c) Programs

The Secretary may sponsor, coordinate, or enter into cooperative agreements for educational or cultural programs related to the park as the Secretary considers appropriate to carry out the purposes of this subchapter.

#### (d) Identification and marking of significant historical sites

The Secretary may identify other significant sites related to the Wright brothers, the history of aviation, or Paul Laurence Dunbar in the Miami Valley which are related to the park, and, with the consent of the owner or owners thereof, may mark the sites appropriately and make reference to them in any interpretive literature. The Secretary may provide interpretive markers along transportation routes leading to units of the park.

#### (e) Interpretation of Huffman Prairie Flying Field

The Secretary may provide interpretation of Huffman Prairie Flying Field on Wright Brothers Hill, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio.

(Pub. L. 102–419, title I, §105, Oct. 16, 1992, 106 Stat. 2142.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Act entitled "An Act to establish a National Park Service, and for other purposes", approved August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535; 16 U.S.C. 1–4), referred to in subsec. (a), is act Aug. 25, 1916, ch. 408, 39 Stat. 535, known as the National Park Service Organic Act, which enacted sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 of this title and provisions set out as a note under section 100101 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs. Sections 1 to 4 of the Act were repealed and restated as section 1865(a) of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and section 100101(a), chapter 1003, and sections 100751(a), 100752, 100753, and 102101 of Title 54 by Pub. L. 113–287, §§3, 4(a)(1), 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3094, 3260, 3272. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables. For disposition of former sections of this title, see Disposition Table preceding section 100101 of Title 54.

1 See References in Text note below.