alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §349. Rights-of-way

Whenever consistent with the primary purposes of Denali National Park, the Act of February fifteenth, nineteen hundred and one,1 applicable to the location of rights of way in certain national parks and national forests for irrigation and other purposes, shall be and remain applicable to the lands included within the park.

(Feb. 26, 1917, ch. 121, §3, 39 Stat. 938; Pub. L. 96–487, title II, §202(3)(a), Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2382.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Act of February fifteenth, nineteen hundred and one, referred to in text, is act Feb. 15, 1901, ch. 372, 31 Stat. 790, which is classified to section 959 of Title 43, Public Lands. The Act, insofar as it related to National Park System units, was repealed and restated as section 100902(a) of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs, by Pub. L. 113–287, §§3, 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3094, 3272.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Denali National Park" substituted in text for "Mount McKinley National Park" pursuant to Pub. L. 96–487, §202(3)(a), which is classified to section 410hh–1(3)(a) of this title and which added lands to the park, established additional land as the Denali National Preserve, and redesignated the whole as the Denali National Park and Preserve.

1 See References in Text note below.
Asire ou li kouvri nen ou ak bouch ou pou ede pwoteje lòt moun. 

Ou ta gendwa enfekte epi ou pa gen sentòm.

Pratike Distans Sosyal

Rete 6 pye (longè 2 bra) distans ak lòt moun.

Epi Mete yon Pwoteksyon Figi an Twal

Ede Pwoteje Tèt Ou ak Pwoteje Lòt Moun kont COVID-19

CS 317297-F 05/29/2020
### IDEM **INDIANA DEPARTMENT**  **OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT**  **We Protect** **Hoosiers and Our** **Environment. 100**  **N. Senate** **Avenue •**  **Indianapolis, IN**  **46204 (800)**  **451-6027 •**  **(317) 232-8603**  **• www** **.idem.IN.gov Michael**  **R. Pence**  **Go\'eruor Thomas** **W. Easterly**  **Commissim1er**

**Susan Hedman**  **Regional Administrator**  **U.S. EPA,**  **Region 5**  **77 West**  **Jackson Boulevard**  **Chicago, Illinois**  **60604** 

### January **28, 2015** 

**Re: Clarification**  **on Certain State**  **Implementation Plan**  **Submittals for**  **Indiana**

**Dear Ms.**  **Hedman:**

**The following**  **State Implementation**  **Plan (SIP)**  **revisions were**  **submitted to**  **the United**  **States Environmental**  **Protection Agency**  **(U.S. EPA)** **under the**  **signature of** **Nancy King,**  **Chief, Rules**  **Development Branch,**  **Office of** **Legal Counsel**  **over the**  **past two**  **years. With** **this letter,**  **I confirm**  **that I**  **am in**  **agreement with,**  **and approve**  **of, each**  **of these**  **submittals.**



### Submittal **SIP Title**  **Date Indiana**  **2012 NAAQS**  **Update, LSA**  **#12-510(F) 01/30/2013**  **Indiana Section**  **111(d)/129 State**  **Plan for**  **Sewage Sludge**  **Incineration Units;**  **326 1AC**  **02/27/2013 11-1**  **0 (LSA**  **#11-586) Indiana**  **Degreasing Operations 03/14/2013**  **Indiana Minor** **NSR for**  **Title** 

### V **and FESOP**  **Sources (326**  **lAC 2-7-10.5**  **and 326**  **lAC 2-**  **11/07/2013 8-11.1)**  **Indiana Sewage**  **Sludge Incinerator**  **Monitoring; 326**  **1AC 3-5-1(b)(6)(A);**  **(LSA #13-215)**  **01/22/2014 Indiana**  **BART revision**  **for Alcoa**  **Power Generating**  **Inc. 07/23/2014**  **Indiana Ozone**  **and PM2.5**  **Standards 08/20/2014**  **Indiana 2013**  **Annual CFR**  **Update 09/17/2014**  **Indiana Alternative**  **RACT Requirements**  **for Jeffboat,**  **LLC 10/23/2014**  **Indiana Alcoa**  **BART supplement**  **01/09/2015 Indiana**  **AEP Rockport, 326**  **lAC 5,**  **LSA #12-392**  **01/13/2015**

**An Equal**  **Opportunity Employer**  

# 0 **@ Recycled** **Paper A** **State that** **Works -** **Future submittals**  **for revisions**  **to the**  **SIP will**  **be under**  **my signature.**  **Please contact**  **me**

**at (317)**  **232-8222, if** **there are**  **any questions**  **about this**  **clarification.**

**KB/cep**

**cc: John** **Mooney, U.S.**  **EPA Region**  

### V

**Pamela Blakley,**  **U.S. EPA**  **Region**

### V **Doug Aburano,**  **U.S. EPA**  **Region** 

### V **Steve Rosenthal,**  **U.S. EPA**  **Region** 

### V **Chris Panos,**  **U.S. EPA** **Region** 

### V **Nancy King,**  **IDEM Christine**  **Pedersen, IDEM**  **SIP file**  **Sincerely,**



# �**B �** 
**Keith Baugues**  **Assistant Commissioner Office**  **of Air**  **Quality**
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

771 

CAF 13-00652 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF TIMOTHY SEIFERT, 

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NATALIE PASTWICK, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

 

THE ABBATOY LAW FIRM, PLLC, ROCHESTER (DAVID M. ABBATOY, JR., OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

JON STERN, ROCHESTER, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

MARY ANNE CONNELL, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, BUFFALO. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Kevin M.

Carter, J.), entered April 1, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to Family

Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, awarded

petitioner sole custody of the subject child. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the matter is

remitted to Family Court, Erie County, for a new hearing in accordance

with the following Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to Family

Court Act article 6, respondent mother appeals from an order that,

among other things, awarded petitioner father sole custody of the

parties’ child. We agree with the mother that she was denied her

right to counsel. The mother was entitled to representation based

upon her status as a respondent in a Family Court Act article 6

proceeding and a person alleged to be in willful violation of a court

order, and Family Court’s inquiry concerning her decision to proceed

pro se was insufficient to enable the court to determine whether she

knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived her right to counsel

(see § 262 [a]; Matter of Hassig v Hassig, 34 AD3d 1089, 1091; see

also Matter of Storelli v Storelli, 101 AD3d 1787, 1788). We

therefore reverse the order and remit the matter to Family Court for a

new hearing (see Storelli, 101 AD3d at 1788). In light of our

determination, we do not reach the mother’s remaining contentions. 

Entered: June 20, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 114 

Expressing support for the designation of March 21, 2019, as ‘‘National 

Rosie the Riveter Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 14, 2019 

Mr. CASEY (for himself, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. COONS, and Mr. 

ISAKSON) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of March 21, 2019, 

as ‘‘National Rosie the Riveter Day’’. 

Whereas National Rosie the Riveter Day is a collective national effort to raise awareness of the more than 

18,000,000 women in the civilian labor force during 

World War II; 

Whereas the people of the United States have chosen to 

honor women workers who contributed from the home 

front during World War II; 

Whereas those women left their homes to work or volunteer 

full-time in factories, farms, shipyards, airplane factories, 

banks, and other institutions in support of the Armed 

Forces overseas; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 114 ATS 

Whereas those women worked with the United Service Organizations and the American Red Cross, drove trucks, riveted airplane parts, collected critical materials, rolled 

bandages, and served on rationing boards; 

Whereas it is fitting and proper to recognize and preserve the 

history and legacy of working women, including volunteer 

women, during World War II to promote cooperation and 

fellowship among those women and their descendants; 

Whereas those women and their descendants wish to further 

the advancement of patriotic ideas, excellence in the 

workplace, and loyalty to the United States; and 

Whereas March 21, 2019, during Women’s History Month, is 

an appropriate day to designate as ‘‘National Rosie the 

Riveter Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the designation of March 21, 

3 2019, as ‘‘National Rosie the Riveter Day’’; and 

4 (2) acknowledges the important role played by 

5 women during World War II. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
### §1859. Criminal offenses

#### (a) Offenses

A person is guilty of an offense if he commits any act prohibited by—

(1) section 1857(1)(D), (E), (F), (H), (I), or (L) of this title; or

(2) section 1857(2) of this title.

#### (b) Punishment

Any offense described in subsection (a)(1) is punishable by a fine of not more than $100,000, or imprisonment for not more than 6 months, or both; except that if in the commission of any such offense the person uses a dangerous weapon, engages in conduct that causes bodily injury to any observer described in section 1857(1)(L) of this title or any officer authorized to enforce the provisions of this chapter (as provided for in section 1861 of this title), or places any such observer or officer in fear of imminent bodily injury, the offense is punishable by a fine of not more than $200,000, or imprisonment for not more than 10 years, or both. Any offense described in subsection (a)(2) is punishable by a fine of not more than $200,000.

#### (c) Jurisdiction

There is Federal jurisdiction over any offense described in this section.

(Pub. L. 94–265, title III, §309, Apr. 13, 1976, 90 Stat. 357; Pub. L. 97–453, §11(a), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2491; Pub. L. 99–659, title I, §107(b), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3713; Pub. L. 100–66, §2, July 10, 1987, 101 Stat. 384; Pub. L. 101–627, title I, §115, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4455.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (b), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 94–265, Apr. 13, 1976, 90 Stat. 331, known as the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1801 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1990—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 101–627, §115(a), amended par. (1) generally, substituting "(I), or (L)" for "or (I)".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 101–627, §115(b), substituted "$100,000" for "$50,000", substituted "$200,000" for "$100,000" in two places, and inserted "any observer described in section 1857(1)(L) of this title or" after "injury to" and "observer or" before "officer in fear".

1987—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 100–66 substituted "(I)" for "(J)".

1986—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 99–659 substituted "(H), or (J)" for "or (H)".

1983—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 97–453 struck out ", or imprisonment for not more than 1 year, or both" after "subsection (a)(2) is punishable by a fine of not more than $100,000".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1983 Amendment

Pub. L. 97–453, §11(b), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2491, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] applies with respect to offenses committed under section 309 [this section] on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Jan. 12, 1983]."

#### Effective Date

Section effective Mar. 1, 1977, see section 312 of Pub. L. 94–265, formerly set out as a note under section 1857 of this title.
### §1423e. Votes taken by the United States section on matters before the Commission

In accordance with paragraph 3 of article 8 of the Agreement, the United States section, made up of commissioners appointed by the President, shall vote on any issue before the United States-Russia Polar Bear Commission only if there is no disagreement between the United States commissioners regarding the vote.

(Pub. L. 92–522, title V, §506, as added Pub. L. 109–479, title IX, §902(a), Jan. 12, 2007, 120 Stat. 3664.)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

AARON CHAVEZ, a.k.a. Aaron ChavezMuniz, a.k.a. Angel Martinez, a.k.a. Angel 

Ulloa, a.k.a. Angel Ulloa-Martinez, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-50372 

D.C. No. 8:16-cr-00141-DOC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 27, 2018**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges. 

Aaron Chavez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his 

guilty-plea conviction and 120-month sentence for distribution of 

methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A)(viii). 

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Chavez’s counsel has filed 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 3 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-50372 

a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw 

as counsel of record. Chavez has filed a pro se supplemental brief; the government 

has filed an answering brief; and Chavez has filed a reply brief.

Chavez waived his right to appeal his conviction, with the exception of an 

appeal based on a claim that his plea was involuntary. Our independent review of 

the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no 

arguable grounds for relief as to the voluntariness of Chavez’s plea. We therefore 

affirm as to that issue and dismiss the remainder of the appeal of the conviction in 

light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 988 

(9th Cir. 2009).

Our independent review of the record discloses no arguable grounds for 

relief on direct appeal as to Chavez’s sentence, with the exception of three 

supervised release conditions. We therefore affirm the sentence except as to 

standard conditions five, six, and fourteen, which were held to be

unconstitutionally vague after the district court sentenced Chavez. See United 

States v. Evans, 883 F.3d 1154, 1162-64 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 2018 WL 2726034 

(U.S. Oct. 1, 2018) (No. 17-9208). We remand for the district court to modify 

these conditions consistent with our opinion in Evans. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part; REMANDED with 

instructions.
### §460l–7. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 88–578, title I, §5, formerly §4, Sept. 3, 1964, 78 Stat. 900; Pub. L. 90–401, §3, July 15, 1968, 82 Stat. 355; renumbered §5, Pub. L. 92–347, §2, July 11, 1972, 86 Stat. 459; amended Pub. L. 94–273, §3(4), Apr. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 376; Pub. L. 94–422, title I, §101(2), Sept. 28, 1976, 90 Stat. 1314; Pub. L. 95–42, §1(2), June 10, 1977, 91 Stat. 210, related to allocation of land and water conservation fund for State and Federal purposes. See section 200304 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.

A prior section 5 of Pub. L. 88–578 was renumbered section 6 and was classified to section 460l–8 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 113–287.
### STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS DONTE M. PATTERSON NO. 

### 2024 KW0052 

### FEBRUARY26, 2024

In Re: Donte M. Patterson, 

### applying for 

### supervisory writs,



### 22nd Judicial 

### District Court, Parish of St. 

## Tammany, No. 

### 576674, 

### 593630. BEFORE: THERIOT, PENZATO, AND GREENE, JJ.

WRITDENIED. MRT AHP HG
### §251c. Administration of acquired lands

Lands acquired pursuant to the exchange authority contained herein shall be administered as a part of Olympic National Park in accordance with the laws and regulations applicable to the park.

(Pub. L. 85–455, §2, June 11, 1958, 72 Stat. 185.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Herein, referred to in text, means Pub. L. 85–455, June 11, 1958, 72 Stat. 185, which is classified to sections 251b to 251d of this title. The "exchange authority" referred to in text is contained in section 1 of the Act, which is classified to section 251b of this title.
### §459d–7. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of sections 459d to 459d–7 of this title; except that no more than $5,350,000 shall be appropriated for the acquisition of land and waters and improvements thereon, and interests therein, and incidental costs relating thereto, in accordance with the provisions of such sections.

(Pub. L. 87–712, §8, Sept. 28, 1962, 76 Stat. 652; Pub. L. 94–578, title I, §101(13), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2733.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 101(13) of Pub. L. 94–578, cited as a credit to this section, as amended by Pub. L. 96–199, title I, §111, Mar. 5, 1980, 94 Stat. 70, is also set out in part as a note under section 459d–1 of this title.

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–578 substituted "$5,350,000" for "$5,000,000".
§ 523.43 Loss of FSA Time Credits. ( a ) *Procedure for loss of FSA Time Credits.* An inmate may lose earned FSA Time Credits for violation of the requirements or rules of an EBRR Program or PA. The procedures for loss of FSA Time Credits are described in 28 CFR part 541.
( b ) *How to appeal loss of FSA Time Credits.* Inmates may seek review of the loss of earned FSA Time Credits through the Bureau's Administrative Remedy Program (28 CFR part 542).
( c ) *Restoration of FSA Time Credits.* An inmate who has lost FSA Time Credits under this subpart may have part or all of the FSA Time Credits restored to him or her, on a case-by-case basis, after clear conduct (behavior clear of inmate disciplinary infractions under 28 CFR part 541) for two consecutive risk and needs assessments conducted by the Bureau.
#### In the Matter of the Application of Thomas W. Osborne, Respondent, for a Writ of Mandamus against William A. Prendergast, as Comptroller of the City of New York, and Another, Appellants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  Exhibit 10(z)

                   THIRD AMENDMENT TO STOCKHOLDERS' AGREEMENT


         THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO STOCKHOLDERS' AGREEMENT is entered into this
22nd day of June, 1995, by and among CHARLES A. HAYES ("Hayes"), MAURICE
FISHMAN ("Fishman") (Hayes and Fishman being collectively hereinafter referred
to as the "Stockholders'), and GUILFORD MILLS, INC., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company").

                                  WITNESSETH:


         WHEREAS, the Stockholders and the Company entered into a Stockholders'
Agreement, dated April 30, 1991, as amended, pursuant to which the Company is
required to purchase, upon the death of either Hayes or Fishman, such number of
shares of his Company  common stock as equals $5,000,000 and $4,000,000,
respectively (the "1991 Stockholders' Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, the Stockholders and the Company believe that it is desirable
to amend the 1991 Stockholders' Agreement as more fully set forth below.

         NOW, THEREFORE,   in consideration of the covenants and conditions
contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as
follows:

         1.      Section 7(c) of the 1991 Stockholders' Agreement is hereby
deleted in its entirety and the following section is inserted in its place:

                 (c)      June 27, 1997.

         2.      Except as other wise expressly set forth above, the 1991
Stockholders' Agreement remains unmodified and in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Third Amendment as
of the day and year first above written.



    GUILFORD MILLS, INC.                          STOCKHOLDERS:

    By: _________________________________       ________________________________
         Terrence E. Geremski                    Charles A. Hayes
         Vice President, Chief Financial
         Officer and Treasurer                  
                                                ________________________________
                                                 Maurice Fishman
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>     5


<CAPTION>

Article 5 Fin. Data Schedule for 3rd Qtr 10-Q

<S>                               <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-2001
<PERIOD-END>                      MAR-31-2001
<CASH>                                 1,133
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       1,133
<PP&E>                                     0
<DEPRECIATION>                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         1,133
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      0
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                              51,900
<OTHER-SE>                                 0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               0
<SALES>                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           0
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         728
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            0
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                            (728)
<EPS-BASIC>                           (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (.00)




</TABLE>