2013 Revision to the Sacramento Regional 8-Hour Ozone Appendix C - Proposed Control Measures

Attainment and Reasonable Further Progress Plan September 26, 2013

Control Measure Number: FRAQMD - 3.19

Control Measure Title: Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations

Date: February 2,2007

Control Measure Description

Automotive refinishing coatings are used on motor vehicles and other mobile

equipment, primarily by auto body repair and paint shops and automotive dealerships.

VOC emissions from the surface coating operations result from the evaporation of the

organic solvents used in the coatings. These emissions occur in a number of places

during the operation, including surface preparation and cleanup, application of the

coating, drying of the parts, and cleanup of the application equipment.

On October 20, 2005, CARB adopted a Suggested Control Measure (SCM) for

automotive coatings. The SCM would introduce several significant changes into

FRAQMD Rule 3.19, Vehicle and Motor Equipment Coating Operations, such as:

• Consolidation of limits for Group I and Group II vehicles

• Consolidation of the primers, primer sealers, and primer surfacer categories

• Deletion of the multi-stage topcoats category, and replacement with separate

limits for color coats and clear coats

• Elimination of the specialty coatings category, with specific limits for each type of

coating, and a general limit applicable to all other coatings.

• Lower VOC limits for most coating categories.

The proposed control measure will evaluate the information from CARB’s SCM and

propose amendments to Rule 3.19.

Emission Inventory— 2018

The population growth rate in South Sutter is purely based on the current Sutter County

population growth rate projected by SACOG. The potential growth of proposed South

Sutter Specific Plan (now called Sutter Pointe Specific Plan) is not factored in.

VOC Planning Inventory (tpd)

EIC Code EIC Descrtption 2018

Automobile Retinish

230-218-9000-0000 Coatings. Unspecified

Total 0.0035

Automotive Refinishing FRAQMD-3. 19

Page C-81
2013 Revision to the Sacramento Regional 8-Hour Ozone Appendix C - Proposed Control Measures

Attainment and Reasonable Further Progress Plan September 26. 2013

Emission Reductions

Implementation VOC Emission Reduction (tpd)

EIC Description Adoption Date Date 2018

Automotive 2016 2017 00008

Refinishing

Cost Effectiveness

The cost effectiveness is expected to range between $5,560 and $77,300 per ton of

ROG reduced.

Authority

The Feather River Air Quality Management District has the authority to propose rules

and regulations to the District Board for adoption under I-ISC 40001.

Implementation

The implementation of this control measure does not involve any other agency other

than the Feather River Air Quality Management District.

References

1. El Dorado County AQMD Rule 230, Adopted September 27, 1994.

2. Feather River AQMD Rule 3.19, Adopted August 6, 1998.

3. Placer County APCD Rule 234, Revised April 9, 1998.

4. Sacramento Metro AQMD Rule 459, Revised October 2, 1997.

5. Yolo-Solano AQMD Rule 2.26, Revised August 13, 1997.

6. Draft Staff Report, Rule 459, SMAQMD. August 2001.

7. Rule adoption files, Rule 459, SMAQMD.

8. California Air Resources Board, Staff Report for The Proposed Suggested Control

Measures Automotive Coatings, October 2005

9. California ARB Forecasted Emissions by Summary Category. Ozone SIP

Sacramento NAA Projections (vi .06_RF980)

www.arb.ca .gov/app/emsinvlo3siplfcemssumcat_03v1 .06.php. November 16, 2006

10. Control Measure, FRAQMD —3.19, February 2,2007

Automotive Refinishing FRAOMD-3j 9

Page C-82
2013 Revision to the Sacramento Regional 8-Hour Ozone Appendix C - Proposed Control Measures

Attainment and Reasonable Further Progress Plan Seutember 26. 2013

Table H-4

FRAQMO Statioriary!Area Source Control Measures Considered

Measure Opportunity for

No. Title Current Requirements Strengthening Conclusion

Establish VOC limits on Not Recommended

Adhesives and N adhesives and sealants - Evaluated [or Sealants one ~itarto limits used in Attainment

SCAGMO Advancement

Architectural Reduce the VOC limits 315 Coatin VOC limits on coatings on the coatings Control Measure

gs consistent with the SCM

Degreasing! Kee lid ci se on tan~s ter Require VOC limits on

314 Solvent ~ ~ degreasinglsolvent Control Measure

Cleaning - cleaning process.

Establish VOC limits on Not Recommended

2 Unspecrned None coatings that have not - Evaluated for Coatings been established in Attainment

another rule. Advancement

Automotive Reduce the VOC limits 319 Reflnishin VOC limits on coatings on the coatings Control Measure 9 consistent with the SCM

Paper, Fabric, None Establish VOC limits on Not Recommended

coating coatings. - No sources

NOx limits on boilerlsteam

generators with rated heat input Require NOx limits for N t d d

Boilers and capacity oft mmBtulhr or greater; boiler between 1-5 ~vai~~T~ e

3.21 Steam -1-5 rnmBTUThrMnual Tune Up, mmBtuThr, and reduce Attainment

Generators >5 mmBTUihr using gaseous fuel NOx limit for boiler >5 ~lva t

30 ppm. >5 mmBTtJ/hr using non- mmBtu/hr ncemen.

gaseous fuel 40 ppm

NOx limits on boilerlsteam

generators with rated heat input

Boilers and capacity of I mmBtulhr or greater; Reduce NOx limit to 6 Not Recommended

3.21 Steam i-a mmBTUIhr Annual Tune tip, >~ BTU/h N So

Generators >5 mmBTUihr using gaseous ~ ppm r mm r — 0 urces

30 ppm, >5 mmBTIJIhr using nongaseous fuel 40 ppm

3.22 IC Engines None NO’x limits on Control Measure

Not Recommended

38/39 Storage Tan~•5 vapor Requires l~susecontrol of a device floating motor Lower thresholdapplicability Attainment - Evaluated [or

Advancement

Establish CAP and Trade ,~, + r,

Emission RedUCUOT~ OL ~ecommen e

Cap and Trade None Program similar to

SCAQMD s RECLAIM Advancement

Establish standards to Not Recommended

Commercial N control VOC emissions - Evaluated for

Cooking for Commercial Cooking Attainment

(i.e. char boilers) Advancement

Livestock None Lower applicability Not Recommended

Waste threshold — No Sources

Establish standards to Not Recomme ded

reduce evaporative VOC ~ •~

Wineries None ~ - va ua or

feimentation process at Advancement

Appendix H: Reasonably Available Control Measures Analysis

Page H-22
Is this helpful? Is there anything else you need re 3.19?

John Ungvarsky

Environmental Scientist

USEPA, Region 9

75 Hawthorne St. (AIR-2)

San Francisco, CA 94105

415-972-3963

510-667-9743 (alternate work site)