1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

Release No. 11097 / September 6, 2022

ADMINISTRATIVE

PROCEEDING File No. 3-21032

ORDER FIXING TIME AND 

PLACE OF PUBLIC 

HEARINGS AND

INSTITUTING 

ADMINISTRATIVE

PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT

TO SECTION 8(d) OF THE 

SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

I.

The Commission’s public official files disclose that:

On August 18, 2022, ELECTROPREMIUM (“Electropremium” or “Respondent”) filed a 

registration statement on a Form S-1 (“Registration Statement”). The Registration Statement

purports to be in connection with a public offering of 125,000 shares of Respondent’s “solar 

series” securities at a price of $4 per share. The Registration Statement was filed without a 

delaying amendment and no other amendments have been filed. The Registration Statement is 

not effective. 

II.

After an investigation, the Division of Enforcement alleges that:

A. The Respondent

1. Respondent is a California corporation headquartered in Fullerton, California. 

2. Respondent purportedly has three product lines: (i) “the installation of solar cells 

on top of [ ] used hybrid vehicles”; (ii) “the manufacturing & design of wireless 

computer modems”; and (iii) “the design & manufacturing of battery charger[s] 

for hybrid vehicles.” 

3. Respondent states in the Registration Statement that it has only one employee and 

has had no income. 

In the Matter of

The Registration Statement of

ELECTROPREMIUM, 4006 W 

Commonwealth Ave, Fullerton, 

CA 02933

 Respondent.
2

B. Material Misstatements and Omissions

4. Respondent’s Registration Statement contains untrue statements of material fact 

and omits to state material facts necessary to make the statements therein not 

misleading. Moreover, the Registration Statement lacks audited financial 

statements, as well as other essential information required by Regulation S-K and 

Form S-1.

5. Respondent’s Registration Statement falsely states that Electropremium has three 

product lines. However, Respondent has no products. Moreover, Respondent has 

no proprietary technology or specialized expertise in these product areas, and no 

design or manufacturing equipment. 

6. Respondent’s Registration Statement states that, for its battery-charger product 

line, “a contract is in process with DEFENSE SUPPLY CENTER COLUMBUS.” 

This statement is false.

7. According to the Registration Statement, Electropremium has assets of 

“$600,000,000.00 plus $500,000.00 totalling $600,500,000.00,” apparently based 

on Respondent’s valuation of its unsold securities, including the $500,000 it 

would receive from the sale of all of the securities subject to the Registration 

Statement. However, Respondent has never sold any securities, has no business, 

has never had income and has no intellectual property, no employees, no investors 

and no financing. There is no plausible support for the Respondent’s valuation of 

its unsold securities. 

8. The above described false and/or misleading statements are material.

III.

The Commission, having considered the aforesaid, deems it appropriate and in the public

interest that public proceedings pursuant to Section 8(d) of the Securities Act be instituted with

respect to the Registration Statement to determine whether the allegations of the Division of

Enforcement are true; to afford the Respondent with an opportunity to establish any defenses to

these allegations; and to determine whether a stop order should issue suspending the effectiveness 

of the Registration Statement referred to herein.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that public proceedings be and hereby are instituted 

under Section 8(d) of the Securities Act, such hearing to be convened at 10:00 a.m. on 

September 21, 2022 via remote means and/or in Hearing Room 1 at the Commission’s offices 

at 100 F Street N.E., Washington, DC 20549, and to continue thereafter at such time and place 

as the hearing officer may determine.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that these proceedings shall be presided over by an

Administrative Law Judge to be designated by further order, who is authorized to perform all the 

duties of an Administrative Law Judge as set forth in the Commission’s Rules of Practice or as

otherwise provided by law.
3

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Respondent shall file an Answer to the allegations

contained in this Order within ten (10) days after service of this Order, pursuant to Rule 220 of the

Commission's Rules of Practice, 17 C.F.R. § 201.220. If the Respondent fails to file the directed

answer, or fails to appear at a hearing after being duly notified, the Respondent may be deemed in

default and the proceedings may be determined against the Respondent upon consideration of this

Order, the allegations of which may be deemed to be true as provided by Rules 155(a), 220(f), 221 

(f), and 310 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.155(a), 201.220(f),

201.221(f) and 201.310. This Order shall be served forthwith upon the Respondent in accordance

with Rule 141 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, 17 C.F.R. § 201.141.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Administrative Law Judge shall issue an initial

decision no later than 120 days from the occurrence of one of the following events: (A) The

completion of post-hearing briefing in a proceeding where the hearing has been completed; (B)

Where the hearing officer has determined that no hearing is necessary, upon completion of 

briefing on a motion pursuant to Rule 250 of theCommission’sRules of Practice, 17 C.F.R.

§ 201.250; or(C) The determination by the hearing officer that a party is deemed to be in default

underRule 155 of the Commission’sRules of Practice, 17 C.F.R. § 201.155 and no hearing is

necessary.

Attention is called to Rule 151(a), (b) and (c) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, 17 

C.F.R. § 201.151(a), (b) and (c), providing that when, as here, a proceeding is set before the 

Commission, all papers (including those listed in the following paragraph) shall be filed 

electronically in administrative proceedings using the Commission’s Electronic Filings in 

Administrative Proceedings (eFAP) system access through the Commission’s website, 

www.sec.gov, at http://www.sec.gov/eFAP. Respondent also must serve and accept service of 

documents electronically. All motions, objections, or applications will be decided by the 

Commission. 

In the absence of an appropriate waiver, no officer or employee of the Commission

engaged in the performance of investigative or prosecuting functionsin this or any factually

related proceeding will be permitted to participate or advise in the decision of this matter, except 

as witness or counsel in proceedings held pursuant to notice.

Since this proceeding is not “rule making” within the meaning of Section 551 of the

Administrative Procedure Act, it is not deemed subject to the provisions of Section 553 delaying the

effective date of any final Commission action.

By the Commission.

Vanessa A. Countryman

 Secretary