alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §460ll. Findings and declaration of policy

(a) The Congress finds that—

(1) certain lands on the Lolo National Forest in Montana have high value for watershed, water storage, wildlife habitat, primitive recreation, historical, scientific, ecological, and educational purposes. This national forest area has long been used as a wilderness by Montanans and by people throughout the Nation who value it as a source of solitude, wildlife, clean, free-flowing waters stored and used for municipal purposes for over a century, and primitive recreation, to include such activities as hiking, camping, backpacking, hunting, fishing, horse riding, and bicycling; and

(2) certain other lands on the Lolo National Forest, while not predominantly of wilderness quality, have high value for municipal watershed, recreation, wildlife habitat, and ecological and educational purposes.

(b) Therefore, it is hereby declared to be the policy of Congress that, to further the purposes of the Wilderness Act of 1964 (16 U.S.C. 1131) and the National Forest Management Act of 1976 (16 U.S.C. 1600), the people of the Nation and Montana would best be served by national recreation area designation of the Rattlesnake area to include the permanent preservation of certain of these lands under established statutory designation as wilderness, and to promote the watershed, recreational, wildlife, and educational values of the remainder of these lands.

(Pub. L. 96–476, §1, Oct. 19, 1980, 94 Stat. 2271.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131), referred to in subsec. (b), is Pub. L. 88–577, Sept. 3, 1964, 78 Stat. 890, which is classified generally to chapter 23 (§1131 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1131 of this title and Tables.

The National Forest Management Act of 1976 (16 U.S.C. 1600), referred to in subsec. (b), is Pub. L. 94–588, Oct. 22, 1976, 90 Stat. 2949, which enacted sections 472a, 521b, 1600, and 1611 to 1614 of this title, amended sections 500, 515, 516, 518, 576b, and 1601 to 1610 of this title, repealed sections 476, 513, and 514 of this title, and enacted provisions set out as notes under sections 476, 513, 528, 594–2, and 1600 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1976 Amendment note set out under section 1600 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 96–476, §1, Oct. 19, 1980, 94 Stat. 2271, provided in part: "That this Act [enacting this subchapter] may be cited as the 'Rattlesnake National Recreation Area and Wilderness Act of 1980'."
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 384 

To authorize testimony in United States v. Margaret Murphy. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 24, 2019 

Mr. MCCONNELL (for himself and Mr. SCHUMER) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize testimony in United States v. Margaret Murphy. 

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Margaret Murphy, 

Case No. 2018CMD018331, pending in the Superior 

Court for the District of Columbia, the Government has 

subpoenaed for testimony Jason Covey, an employee of 

the Committee on the Judiciary; 

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and Rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be taken 

from such control or possession but by permission of the 

Senate; and 

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or 

in the possession of the Senate is needed for the promotion of justice, the Senate will take such action as will 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 384 ATS 

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges 

of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That Jason Covey, an employee of the Com2 mittee on the Judiciary, is authorized to testify in the case 

3 of United States v. Margaret Murphy, except concerning 

4 matters for which a privilege should be asserted. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
### §4414. Assessment of progress in wetlands conservation

Not later than January 31, 1996, the Secretary, in cooperation with the Council, to further the purposes of the chapter shall—

(1) develop and implement a strategy to assist in the implementation of this Act in conserving the full complement of North American wetlands systems and species dependent on those systems, that incorporates information existing on the date of the issuance of the strategy in final form on types of wetlands habitats and species dependent on the habitats; and

(2) develop and implement procedures to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of wetlands conservation projects completed under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 101–233, §19, as added Pub. L. 103–375, §3, Oct. 19, 1994, 108 Stat. 3494.)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y, (12 CFR part 225) to engage                     *de novo,*                     or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                

                    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of                           ( print page 16629)                        Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.                

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than April 8, 2011.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (Michael E. Collins, Senior Vice President) 100 North 6th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105-1521:

                    1.                     *Bryn Mawr Bank Corporation,*                     Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania; to acquire PWMG Bank and Trust, Inc., Hersey Pennsylvania, a                     *de novo*                     non-depository trust company, and thereby engage in trust company activities, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(4)(ii) of Regulation Y.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 21, 2011.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2011-6951 Filed 3-23-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
### §4711. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–282, title IX, §903(a)(2)(A)(i), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4354

Section, Pub. L. 101–646, title I, §1101, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4763; Pub. L. 102–580, title III, §302(b)(1), Oct. 31, 1992, 106 Stat. 4839; Pub. L. 102–587, title IV, §4002, Nov. 4, 1992, 106 Stat. 5068; Pub. L. 104–332, §2(b)(2), Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4075, related to aquatic nuisance species in waters of United States.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 115–282, title IX, §903(a)(2)(A), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4354, provided that the repeal of this section by section 903(a)(2)(A) is effective beginning on Dec. 4, 2018.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Maritime Commission
 Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation Intermediary licenses have been reissued by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. chapter 409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515. License No.
Name/address
Date reissued019297N
Premier Van Lines, Inc., 2208 Harmony Grove Road, Escondido, CA 92029
December 17, 2010.020826NF
New World Forwarding LLC, 8524 Highway 6 North, Suite 276, Houston, TX 77095
December 14, 2010.021268F
Scan Global Logistics, Inc., 650 Atlanta South Parkway, Suite 109, Atlanta, GA 30349
January 15, 2011.021504N
Onward Shipping & Clearing Service Inc., 2305 Oak Lane, Suite 201-B, Grand Prairie, TX 75051
January 10, 2011.
 Sandra L. Kusumoto, Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.


[FR Doc. 2011-6871 Filed 3-22-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 3, 2013

s0826

Order 

Clerk

September 3, 2013

146648

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146648

COA: 310982

Wayne CC: 03-014061-01

JOHN B. BARRETT, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 14, 2012

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
No. 22200.

#### Fred L. Smardo *v.*Ruth M. Huisenga, et al.

(412 P.2d 431)

Decided March 28, 1966.

*443Rector and Kane, Jerry Alan Donley, for plaintiff in error.

Asher and Kraemer, for defendants in error.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Justice Schauer

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case is before the court on a “Motion to Dismiss Writ of Error.” The parties appear in reverse order of their appearance in the trial court and will be referred to as they there appeared.

The briefs disclose that on December 20, 1965, the trial court denied defendant’s motion to quash service of process. On February 3, 1966, writ of error issued on application of the defendant. The plaintiffs subsequently filed their motion to dismiss the writ of error, accompanied by a memorandum brief, and the defendant filed his brief in opposition to the plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss.

Plaintiffs *contend*that the order of the trial court is not a final judgment or order reviewable by writ of error under the provisions of Rule 111(a), R.C.P. Colo., and that defendant’s sole remedy is relief in the nature of prohibition under Rule 116, R.C.P. Colo. The latter *444rule provides that upon proper showing this court may exercise its original jurisdiction, but that relief in the nature of prohibition will not be granted except in matters of great public importance. In *Kellner v. District Court,*127 Colo. 320, 256 P.2d 887, we held that a case in which a court is proceeding without jurisdiction of the persons or the subject matter, as here claimed, involves a matter of great public importance within the meaning of the rule.

Defendant argues that the case of Wells *Aircraft Parts Company v. Allan J. Kayser Company,*118 Colo. 197, 194 P.2d 326, is controlling. He relies upon the following statement contained in that case: “This ruling, denying defendant’s motion to quash, would seem to be an appealable order.” Subsequent cases, however, indicate that relief in the nature of prohibition is the proper remedy under Rule 116; particularly, where it is claimed, as here, that the trial court was proceeding without or in excess of its jurisdiction. *Kellner v. District Court, supra; Treadwell v. District Court,*133 Colo. 520, 297 P.2d 891. We now hold that the language in *Wells Aircraft Parts Company v. Allan J. Kayser Company, supra,*is no longer applicable in this state.

Plaintiffs contend that to hold that an order denying such a motion to quash to be subject to review by writ of error would open the door to writs of error on any and all trial court orders relative to an affirmative defense. With this contention we are inclined to agree.

The jurisdictional question has not been raised in the trial court, except for the motion referred to. No answer or other pleadings have been filed raising the question.

The Writ of Error is dismissed.

Mr. Justice Moore not participating.
### §3165. Standards for granting certain authorizations

In any case in which there is no applicable law with respect to a transportation or utility system, the head of the Federal agency concerned shall, within four months after the date of filing of any final Environmental Impact Statement, make recommendations, for purposes of section 3166(b) of this title, to grant such authorizations as may be necessary to establish such system, in whole or in part, within the conservation system unit concerned if he determines that—

(1) such system would be compatible with the purposes for which the unit was established; and

(2) there is no economically feasible and prudent alternative route for the system.

(Pub. L. 96–487, title XI, §1105, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2461.)
§ 811.13 Notices and appearances. Unless otherwise directed by the Court or CSOSA, ( a ) Notices or reports that are required to be submitted in writing should be sent to: Sex Offender Registration Unit, Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency, Room 2002, 300 Indiana Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20001.
( b ) A person who is required to report in person should go to: Sex Offender Supervision Office, Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency, Room 2002, 300 Indiana Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20001.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE THE

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940

Release No. 35167 / April 9, 2024 

In the Matter of

JAMES ALPHA FUNDS TRUST d/b/a EASTERLY FUNDS TRUST

515 Madison Avenue

New York, New York 10022

EASTERLY INVESTMENT PARTNERS LLC

138 Conant Street

Beverly, Massachusetts 01915

(812-15531)

ORDER UNDER SECTION 6(c) OF THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 

GRANTING AN EXEMPTION FROM SECTION 15(a) OF THE ACT AND CERTAIN 

DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS

James Alpha Funds Trust d/b/a Easterly Funds Trust and Easterly Investment Partners LLC filed 

an application on December 8, 2023, and an amendment to the application on February 9, 2024, 

requesting an order under section 6(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Act”) 

exempting applicants from section 15(a) of the Act, as well as from certain disclosure 

requirements. The order permits applicants to enter into and materially amend subadvisory 

agreements without shareholder approval and also grants relief from certain disclosure 

requirements.

On March 12, 2024, a notice of the filing of the application was issued (Investment Company 

Act Release No. 35153). The notice gave interested persons an opportunity to request a hearing 

and stated that an order granting the application would be issued unless a hearing was ordered. 

No request for a hearing has been filed, and the Commission has not ordered a hearing.

The matter has been considered and it is found, on the basis of the information set forth in the 

application, as amended, that granting the requested exemption is appropriate in the public 

interest and consistent with the protection of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the 

policy and provisions of the Act. 
2

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED, under section 6(c) of the Act, that the relief requested by James Alpha Funds 

Trust d/b/a Easterly Funds Trust and Easterly Investment Partners LLC (File No. 812-15531) is 

granted, effective immediately, subject to the conditions contained in the application, as 

amended.

For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, under delegated authority.

Sherry R. Haywood,

Assistant Secretary.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

August 30, 2021

In the Matter of

Pura Naturals, Inc.,

File No. 500-1

ORDER OF SUSPENSION OF

TRADING

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Pura Naturals, Inc.

(“PNAT1”) (CIK No. 1501257), a good standing Colorado corporation located in Lake Forest, 

CA with a class of securities registered with the Commission pursuant to Securities Exchange 

Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") Section 12(g) because it is delinquent in its periodic filings with 

the Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-Q for the period 

ended September 30, 2019. On May 28, 2021, the Commission’s Division of Corporation 

Finance (“Corporation Finance”) sent a delinquency letter to PNAT requesting compliance with 

its periodic filing requirements, which was delivered. As of July 28, 2021, the common stock of 

PNAT was quoted on OTC Link operated by OTC Markets Group Inc. (formerly “Pink Sheets”) 

(“OTC Link”), had seven market makers, and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of 

Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11(f)(3). 

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors 

require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company. Therefore, it is 

ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the 

 

1 The short form of each issuer’s name is also its stock symbol.
2

securities of the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on 

August 31, 2021, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on September 14, 2021.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary
### §460a–8. Licenses or permits for rights-of-way over parkway lands

The Secretary of the Interior may issue revocable licenses or permits for rights-of-way over, across, and upon parkway lands, or for the use of parkway lands by the owners or lessees of adjacent lands, or for such purposes and under such terms and conditions as he may determine to be consistent with the use of such lands for parkway purposes.

(Pub. L. 90–555, §3, Oct. 9, 1968, 82 Stat. 968.)
### §470w–7. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 89–665, title III, §308, as added Pub. L. 106–355, §2, Oct. 24, 2000, 114 Stat. 1385; amended Pub. L. 106–400, §2, Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1675; Pub. L. 108–293, title VI, §627, Aug. 9, 2004, 118 Stat. 1066, related to historic lighthouse preservation. See sections 305101 to 305105 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
### §460zz–1. Establishment

#### (a) In general

There is hereby established the Mississippi National River and Recreation Area (hereinafter in this subchapter referred to as the "Area") which shall consist of the State designated Mississippi Critical Area encompassing that portion of the Mississippi River and adjacent lands generally within the Saint Paul-Minneapolis Metropolitan Area, as depicted on the map entitled Mississippi National River and Recreation Area numbered MI–NRA/80,000 and dated April 1987. The map shall be on file and available for public inspection in the offices of the Department of the Interior in Washington, District of Columbia, and in the offices of the Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities Area in Saint Paul, Minnesota.

#### (b) Boundaries

The Secretary of the Interior (hereinafter referred to as the "Secretary") shall publish in the Federal Register, as soon as practicable after November 18, 1988, a detailed description and map of the boundaries established under subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 100–696, title VII, §702, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4600.)
**Exhibit32.1**

**Certificationof Chief Executive OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned ChiefExecutive Officer of Hilton Hotels Corporation (the “Company”), herebycertifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the accompanying Annual Report onForm 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”)fully complies with the  requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and thatinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  February 28,2007
|          | /s/ STEPHEN F. BOLLENBACH                               |
|----------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|     | Stephen F. Bollenbach                                   |
| * * | *Co-Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive  Officer* |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelyto accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and is not being filed forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, andis not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whethermade before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporationlanguage in such filing.

 

----
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
ANTHONY MILLER, SR., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-5375 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed August 22, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Debra Johnes Riva, Judge. Anthony Miller, Sr., pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Chelsea S. Alper, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. LaROSE, C.J., and BLACK and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
### SUBCHAPTER LXXII—LAKE MEAD NATIONAL RECREATION AREA