Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Commodity Futures Trading Commission
 AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
 ACTION: FY 2008 and 2009 schedule of fees; establish the FY 2010 schedule of fees revision.
 SUMMARY: The Commission charges fees to designated contract markets and registered futures associations to recover the costs incurred by the Commission in the operation of its program of oversight of self-regulatory organization (SRO) rule enforcement programs (National Futures Association (NFA), a registered futures association, and the contract markets are referred to as SROs). The calculation of the fee amounts to be charged for FY 2010 is based upon an average of actual program costs incurred during FY 2007, 2008, and 2009, as explained below. The FY 2010 fee includes adjustments to program costs incurred in FY 2008 and 2009, which are being revised as a result of an internal review of program costs. The FY 2010 fee schedule and the revision of FY 2008 and 2009 fees are set forth in the 
                        **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**
                         section. Electronic payment of fees is required.
 DATES: The FY 2010 fees for Commission oversight of each SRO rule enforcement program must be paid by each of the named SROs in the amount specified by no later than May 23, 2011.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Carney, Chief Financial Officer, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, (202) 418-5477, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW. Washington, DC 20581. For information on electronic payment, contact Jennifer Fleming, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street NW. Washington, DC 20581, (202) 418-5034.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. General This notice relates to fees for the Commission's review of the rule enforcement programs at the registered 
                    ( print page 16389)
                    futures associations [1]
                    
                     and designated contract markets (DCM), which are collectively referred to herein as SROs, regulated by the Commission. II. Background Information A. General The Commission recalculates the fees charged each year with the intention of recovering the costs of operating this Commission program. Fees are calculated by extracting direct labor costs for rule enforcement reviews from the agency's Budget Programming Accounting Codes (BPAC), which captures each employee's time by project, for a three-year period. The agency then adds an overhead factor for benefits and general administrative costs. The agency uses a three-year rolling average to cover fluctuations in the number of hours spent reviewing each SRO over time. In recognition of the fact that the cost of conducting a review may not correlate directly with the size of a particular SRO, the agency also calculates an alternate fee that takes the volume into account. The agency charges the SRO the lesser of the two fees. Subsequent to an internal review, the Commission found that in FY 2008 and 2009 not all direct program labor costs were captured and that some direct costs were misapplied to SRO reviews. As the formula for calculating the FY 2010 fee to be charged to the SROs includes actual costs incurred in FY 2008 and 2009, the fees for those years are being revised, and the FY 2010 fee is being adjusted to account for the revisions. In addition, the FY 2009 fee that was assessed on USFE is being rescinded,[2]
                    
                     as USFE ceased operations on December 31, 2008. All adjustments are shown in the tables that follow. B. Overhead Rate Once the agency determines the direct costs for rule enforcement review of each SRO, it applies an overhead rate to cover employee benefits and other administrative costs. The overhead rate is calculated by dividing total Commission-wide overhead direct program labor costs into the total amount of the Commission-wide overhead pool. For this purpose, direct program labor costs are the salary costs of personnel working in all Commission programs. Overhead costs consist generally of the following Commission-wide costs: indirect personnel costs (leave and benefits), rent, communications, contract services, utilities, equipment, and supplies. This formula has resulted in the following overhead rates for the most recent three years (rounded to the nearest whole percent): 140 percent for fiscal year 2007, and 144 percent for fiscal year 2008, and 147 percent for 2009. C. Calculation of FY 2010 Fees Under the formula adopted in 1993 (58 FR 42643, Aug. 11, 1993), which appears at 17 CFR part 1 Appendix B, the Commission calculates the fee to recover the costs of its rule enforcement reviews and examinations based on the three-year average of the actual cost of performing such reviews and examinations at each SRO. The cost of operation of the Commission's SRO oversight program varies from SRO to SRO, according to the size and complexity of each SRO's program. The three-year averaging computation method is intended to smooth out year-to-year variations in cost. Timing of the Commission's reviews and examinations may affect costs—a review or examination may span two fiscal years and reviews and examinations are not conducted at each SRO each year. To provide relief to SROs who may bear a disproportionately large share of program costs, the Commission's alternate formula provides for a reduction in the assessed fee if an SRO has a smaller percentage of United States industry contract volume than its percentage of overall Commission oversight program costs. This adjustment reduces the costs so that, as a percentage of total Commission SRO oversight program costs, they are in line with the pro rata percentage for that SRO of United States industry-wide contract volume. The calculation is made as follows: The fee required to be paid to the Commission by each SRO is equal to the lesser of actual costs based on the three-year historical average of costs for that SRO or one-half of average costs incurred by the Commission for each SRO for the most recent three years, plus a pro rata share (based on average trading volume for the most recent three years) of the aggregate of average annual costs of all SROs for the most recent three years. The formula for calculating the second factor is: 0.5a + 0.5 vt = current fee. In this formula, “a” equals the average annual costs, “v” equals the percentage of total volume across SROs over the last three years, and “t” equals the average annual costs for all SROs. NFA has no contracts traded; hence, its fee is based simply on costs for the most recent three fiscal years. The following table summarizes the data used in the calculations and the resulting fee for each entity for FY 2010. The 3-year average actual cost calculations were derived using the FY 2008 and 2009 fees as they are revised elsewhere in this notice: FY 2010 Fees
3-year average actual costs
3-year % of volume
2010 Fee 
                             (lesser of actual or calculated fee)Chicago Board of Trade
$188,085
0.291273
$188,085Chicago Mercantile Exchange
145,952
55.5839
145,952New York Mercantile Exchange
572,494
12.5373
363,321Kansas City Board of Trade
27,303
0.1351
14,482ICE Futures U.S
144,847
2.3324
86,762Minneapolis Grain Exchange
104,706
0.0488
52,653HedgeStreet
23,272
0.002
11,636Chicago Climate Futures Exchange
21,705
0.0205
10,853US Futures Exchange
0
0.0001
0OneChicago
1,157
0.1791
1,157Subtotal
1,229,521

847,901National Futures Association
561,531

561,531( print page 16390)Total
1,791,052

1,436,432
 An example of how the fee is calculated for one exchange, the Chicago Board of Trade, is set forth here: a. Actual three-year average costs equal $188,085 b. The alternative computation is: (.5) ($188,085) + (.5) (.291273) ($1,229,521) = $273,105 c. The fee is the lesser of a or b; in this case $188,085 As noted above, the alternative calculation based on contracts traded is not applicable to NFA because it is not a DCM and has no contracts traded. The Commission's average annual cost for conducting oversight review of the NFA rule enforcement program during fiscal years 2008 through 2010 was $561,531 (one-third of $1,684,592.85). The fee to be paid by the NFA for the current fiscal year is $561,531, plus the adjustment to the fees that were published for FY 2008 and 2009 in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    .[3] D. Revision of FY 2008 and 2009 Fees This year, Commission conducted an internal review of its SRO fee process that has resulted in adjustments to the fees owed by several SROs and NFA. As a result of the internal review FY 2008 and FY 2009 fees for the Commission's review of the rule enforcement programs at the registered futures associations and SROs regulated by the Commission are accordingly revised as follows: FY 2009 Fee Adjustments
Entity
2009 Assessment
Adjustment
2009 RevisionChicago Board of Trade
$77,371
$6,522
$83,893Chicago Mercantile Exchange
121,071
0
121,071New York Mercantile Exchange
197,535
141,670
339,205Kansas City Board of Trade
10,127
13,210
23,337ICE Futures U.S
32,683
1,815
34,498Minneapolis Grain Exchange
62,449
(30,420)
32,029HedgeStreet
14,375
8
14,383Chicago Climate Futures Exchange
12,259
7
12,266US Futures Exchange
18,601
(18,601)
0OneChicago
1,157
0
1,157National Futures Association
179,641
347,243
526,884Total
727,270
461,453
1,188,723
 FY 2008 Fee Adjustments
Entity
2008 Assessment
Adjustment
2008 RevisionChicago Board of Trade
$146,077
$56,971
$203,048Chicago Mercantile Exchange
124,734
0
124,734New York Mercantile Exchange
144,893
104,026
248,919Kansas City Board of Trade
11,119
174
11,293ICE Futures U.S
37,662
1,678
39,340Minneapolis Grain Exchange
28,181
(27,413)
768HedgeStreet
10,194
13
10,207Chicago Climate Futures Exchange
8,306
3
8,309US Futures Exchange
14,602
68
14,670OneChicago
15,836
262
16,098National Futures Association
450,419
(3,045)
447,374Total
992,022
132,737
1,124,760
 E. Final Amounts Due To determine the final amount due from each SRO, the adjustments for FY 2008 and 2009 must be added to or subtracted from FY 2010 fee. For example: Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) will owe $251,578 which is computed as follows, $188,085 (2010 fee) + $6,522 (2009 adjustment amount) + $56,971 (2008 adjustment amount) = $251,578. The following chart provides the calculation for each SRO: Entity
2008 Adjustment
2009 Adjustment
2010 Fee
DueChicago Board of Trade
$56,971
$6,522
$188,085
$251,578( print page 16391)Chicago Mercantile Exchange
0
0
145,952
145,952New York Mercantile Exchange
104,026
141,670
363,321
609,017Kansas City Board of Trade
174
13,210
14,482
27,866ICE Futures U.S
1,678
1,815
86,762
90,255Minneapolis Grain Exchange
(27,413)
(30,420)
52,653
(5,180)HedgeStreet
13
8
11,636
11,657Chicago Climate Futures Exchange
3
7
10,853
10,863OneChicago
262
0
1,157
1,419National Futures Association
(3,045)
347,243
561,531
905,729
 III. Payment Method The Debt Collection Improvement Act (DCIA) requires deposits of fees owed to the government by electronic transfer of funds (See 31 USC 3720). For information about electronic payments, please contact Jennifer Fleming at (202) 418-5034 or 
                    *jfleming@cftc.gov,*
                     or see the CFTC Web site at 
                    *http://www.cftc.gov,*
                     specifically, 
                    *http://www.cftc.gov/​cftc/​cftcelectronicpayments.htm.* Issued in Washington, DC, on March 14, 2011 by the Commission. David Stawick, Secretary of the Commission.


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         NFA is the only registered futures association. Back to Citation
 2.
    
                         
                        *See generally*74 FR 46115 (Sep. 8, 2009). Back to Citation
 3.
    
                         
                        *See*73 FR 44707 (Sep. 29, 2008) and 74 FR 46115 (Sep. 8, 2009). Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2011-6821 Filed 3-22-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6351-01-P