alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Frontiers Marketing
Company,  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the
undersigned, B. Stephen Bailey, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of Janusz Duda, Petitioner, v Board of Education of Uniondale Union Free School District et al., Respondents.

[824 NYS2d 384]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Education of the Uniondale Union Free School District and the Uniondale Union Free School District dated September 23, 2004, which found the petitioner guilty of misconduct and terminated his employment as a custodian at the Turtle Hook Middle School, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Mahon, J.), entered May 5, 2005, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed and the judgment is vacated; and it is further,

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondents.

Since the petition raises a substantial evidence question, the Supreme Court should have transferred the proceeding to the Appellate Division. Nevertheless, since the record is now before us, we will treat the proceeding as if it had been properly *581transferred, and review the matter de novo *(see Matter of Natividad v Glen Cove Hous. Auth.,*308 AD2d 542 [2003]).

“The review of administrative determinations in employee disciplinary cases made as a result of a hearing required by Civil Service Law § 75 is limited to a consideration of whether the determination is supported by substantial evidence” *(Matter of Mann v Town of Monroe,*2 AD3d 527 [2003]; *see Matter of Silberfarb v Board of Coop. Educ. Servs., Third Supervisory Dist., Suffolk County,*60 NY2d 979 [1983]). “Substantial evidence has been defined as such relevant proof as a reasonable mind may accept as adequate to support a conclusion or ultimate fact” *(Matter of Berenhaus v Ward,*70 NY2d 436, 443 [1987] [internal quotation marks omitted]; *see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights,*45 NY2d 176, 180 [1978]). “Moreover, it is the function of the administrative agency or the Hearing Officer, not the reviewing court, to weigh the evidence or assess the credibility of witnesses and determine which testimony to accept and which to reject” *(Matter of Sahni v New York City Bd. of Educ.,*240 AD2d 751 [1997]).

The determination under review was supported by substantial evidence. Additionally, the imposed penalty of dismissal was not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness *(see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County,*34 NY2d 222, 233 [1974]; *Matter of Ficken v Vocational Educ. & Extension Bd. of County of Suffolk,*238 AD2d 589 [1997]).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Schmidt, J.E, Adams, Skelos and Covello, JJ, concur.
### §3122. Research

The Secretary, in cooperation with the State and other appropriate Federal agencies, shall undertake research on fish and wildlife and subsistence uses on the public lands; seek data from, consult with and make use of, the special knowledge of local residents engaged in subsistence uses; and make the results of such research available to the State, the local and regional councils established by the Secretary or State pursuant to section 3115 of this title, and other appropriate persons and organizations.

(Pub. L. 96–487, title VIII, §812, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2428.)
### §410gg–4. Revised comprehensive general management plan; submission to Congressional committees

Within two complete fiscal years from the effective date of this subchapter, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs of the United States House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the United States Senate, a revised comprehensive general management plan for the park consistent with the provisions of this subchapter and pursuant to the provisions of section 100502 of title 54.

(Pub. L. 96–287, title I, §105, June 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 600.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The effective date of this subchapter, referred to in text, probably means the date of enactment of Pub. L. 96–287, which was approved on June 28, 1980.

#### Codification

In text, "section 100502 of title 54" substituted for "section 12(b) of the Act of August 18, 1970 (84 Stat. 825), as amended (16 U.S.C. 1a–1 et seq.)" on authority of Pub. L. 113–287, §6(e), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272, which Act enacted Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs of the House of Representatives changed to Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives on Jan. 5, 1993, by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Third Congress.
### §430uu–1. Revision of boundaries

In order to preserve historic features and sites associated with the Battle of the Big Hole and to facilitate their administration and interpretation, the boundaries of the Big Hole National Battlefield are hereby revised to include the following described lands:

### montana principal meridian

Township 2 south, range 17, west: Section 13, southwest quarter southeast quarter, southeast quarter southwest quarter, east half southwest quarter southwest quarter; section 23, east half northeast quarter southeast quarter; section 24, west half east half, north half southwest quarter, southeast quarter southwest quarter, east half southwest quarter southwest quarter; section 25, those portions of the northeast quarter northwest quarter and the northwest quarter northeast quarter lying north of the north right-of-way line of relocated Montana State Route 43; consisting of approximately 466 acres.

(Pub. L. 88–24, §2, May 17, 1963, 77 Stat. 18.)
#### § 83.660 Recipient.

*Recipient* means any individual, corporation, partnership, association, unit of government (except a Federal agency) or legal entity, however organized, that receives an award directly from a Federal agency.
### §4605. Authority to execute contracts

The Secretary is authorized to enter into contracts and cooperative agreements and generally to do any and all lawful acts necessary or appropriate to further the purposes of the TPIA Program.

(Pub. L. 101–628, title XI, §1106, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4503.)
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 52 (Thursday, March 17, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 14684]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6170]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[F-22014; LLAK-962000-L14100000-HY0000-P]


Alaska Native Claims Selection

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of decision approving lands for conveyance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that 
the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will issue an appealable decision 
to Bering Straits Native Corporation. The decision will approve the 
conveyance of the surface and subsurface estates in certain lands 
pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act. The lands are 
located north of Koyuk, Alaska, and aggregate 4.86 acres. Notice of the 
decision will also be published four times in the Nome Nugget.

DATES: Any party claiming a property interest in the lands affected by 
the decision may appeal the decision within the following time limits:
    1. Unknown parties, parties unable to be located after reasonable 
efforts have been expended to locate, parties who fail or refuse to 
sign their return receipt, and parties who receive a copy of the 
decision by regular mail which is not certified, return receipt 
requested, shall have until April 18, 2011 to file an appeal.
    2. Parties receiving service of the decision by certified mail 
shall have 30 days from the date of receipt to file an appeal.
    3. Notices of appeal transmitted by electronic means, such as 
facsimile or e-mail, will not be accepted as timely filed.
    Parties who do not file an appeal in accordance with the 
requirements of 43 CFR part 4, subpart E, shall be deemed to have 
waived their rights.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the decision may be obtained from: Bureau of Land 
Management, Alaska State Office, 222 West Seventh Avenue, <greek-i>13, 
Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7504.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The BLM by phone at 907-271-5960, by 
e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#385953165a5455165b57564e5d4159565b5d785a5455165f574e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4c2d27622e2021622f23223a29352d222f290c2e2021622b233a">[email protected]</span></a>, or by telecommunication device 
(TTD) through the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-
877-8339, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

Dina L. Torres,
Land Transfer Resolution Specialist, Branch of Preparation and 
Resolution.
[FR Doc. 2011-6170 Filed 3-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Each of the undersigned officers of American Realty Investors, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
Company) hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



| | (i) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2009, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company, at and for the periods indicated.
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                                                                    
|------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 15, 2009 |  | /s/ Daniel J. Moos                                                                 
|                    |  | Daniel J. Moos                                                                     
|                    |  | President and Chief Operating Officer                                              
|                    |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                                                      
|                    | 
|Dated: May 15, 2009 |  | /s/ Gene S. Bertcher                                                               
|                    |  | Gene S. Bertcher                                                                   
|                    |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00334-CV

In re Chelsea Rebecca Cocchia

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Chari L. Kelly, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly

Filed: August 27, 2021
Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America
1750 Hennepin Avenue
Minneapolis, MN  55403
(612) 347-6500

May 5, 2000

VIA EDGAR

_________

Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Investment Management
Office of Insurance Products
450 Fifth Street N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

     RE:     Allianz Life Variable Account B
             File No.  33-72046
             ________________________________

Dear Sir/Madam:

Pursuant to Securities  Act Rule 497(j),  we hereby  certify that the Prospectus
and  Statement of Additional  Information  that would have been filed under Rule
497(c) does not differ  from that  contained  in the most recent  Post-effective
Amendment, which Amendment has been filed electronically.

If you  have  any  questions  or  comments,  please  feel  free to  contact  the
undersigned.


Sincerely,

Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America


By:  /s/  Catherine L. Mielke
    ________________________________
          Catherine L. Mielke
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than January 31, 2011.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Glenda Wilson, Community Affairs Officer) P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:

                    1.                     *First National Bancorp, Inc.,*                     Green Forest, Arkansas; to acquire up to 8.11 percent of the voting shares of Legacy National Bank, Springdale, Arkansas.                

      ( print page 1166)    
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 3, 2011.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2011-69 Filed 1-6-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-4497

_____________________________

NICHOLAS GURNAVAGE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Angela Cox, Judge.

January 26, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and WOLF and RAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized 

motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

_____________________________
2

Nicholas Gurnavage, pro se, Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Bryan Jordan, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Order entered June 19, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 01693
- CV
RXEDO CONSULTING SER VICES, LTD., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP , Appellant
V. AMERIPLAN CORPORATIO N, A TEXAS CORPORATI ON, Appellee On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429
- 04146
- 2009 

### O RDER
W e abated this appeal on March 13, 2014 to allow the parties an opportunity to settle

. By motion filed June 17, 2014, the parties inform us they have sett led and move to dismiss the appeal. Accordingly, we REINSTATE the appeal. The motion to dismiss will be determined separately.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
APPLICANT: JUAN ALBERTO DELEON APPLICATION NO. WR-74,669-03 APPLICATION FOR 11.07 WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS ACTION TAKEN 

### DISMISSED, SUBSEQUENTAPPLICATION. Tex. CodeCrim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 4(a)- (c). JUDGE DATE
### §2627. Relationship to State law

#### (a) Revenue and rate of return

Nothing in this chapter shall authorize or require the recovery by an electric utility of revenues, or of a rate of return, in excess of, or less than, the amount of revenues or the rate of return determined to be lawful under any other provision of law.

#### (b) State authority

Nothing in this chapter prohibits any State regulatory authority or nonregulated electric utility from adopting, pursuant to State law, any standard or rule affecting electric utilities which is different from any standard established by this subchapter.

#### (c) Federal agencies

With respect to any electric utility which is a Federal agency, and with respect to the Tennessee Valley Authority when it is treated as a State regulatory authority as provided in section 2602(17) of this title, any reference in section 2621 or 2623 of this title to State law shall be treated as a reference to Federal law.

(Pub. L. 95–617, title I, §117, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3128.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (b), was in the original "this title", meaning title I (§101 et seq.) of Pub. L. 95–617, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3120, which enacted subchapters I to IV of this chapter and section 6808 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, and amended sections 6802 to 6807 of Title 42. For complete classification of title I to the Code, see Tables.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CARLOS TORRES,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 50 EM 2020

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of August, 2020, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for 

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is GRANTED. Counsel is DIRECTED to file the 

already-prepared Petition for Allowance of Appeal within 5 days.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                             5
<MULTIPLIER>                                       1000
<CURRENCY>                                 U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         OCT-3-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              OCT-3-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1.00
 <CASH>                                       22,554
 <SECURITIES>                                      0
 <RECEIVABLES>                               160,071
 <ALLOWANCES>                                      0
 <INVENTORY>                                 136,772
 <CURRENT-ASSETS>                            338,741
 <PP&E>                                            0
 <DEPRECIATION>                                    0
 <TOTAL-ASSETS>                              753,431
 <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       211,081
 <BONDS>                                           0
 <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
 <PREFERRED>                                       0
 <COMMON>                                        655
 <OTHER-SE>                                  340,290
 <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                753,431
 <SALES>                                     856,838
 <TOTAL-REVENUES>                            856,838
 <CGS>                                       720,913
 <TOTAL-COSTS>                               720,913
 <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
 <LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
 <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           16,598
 <INCOME-PRETAX>                              12,155
 <INCOME-TAX>                                  1,925
 <INCOME-CONTINUING>                          10,230
 <DISCONTINUED>                                    0
 <EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
 <CHANGES>                                         0
 <NET-INCOME>                                 10,230
 <EPS-BASIC>                                  0.47
 <EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.47


</TABLE>
Having type 1

or type 2 

diabetes can 

mean you 

are also 

at risk 

for serious 

complications 

from the flu. 

When you 

get your 

flu shot, 

you protect 

yourself 

and those 

around you.

Fo

My doctor just told me I have diabetes.

“Get a flu shot!” She also said,

ed.

. I’ll get vaccinat I heard her loud and clear

v/flu http://www.cdc.go e inf mation, visit: r mor or

CS254717D