alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-06-0122-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	SEPTEMBER 26, 2006

	______________________________

	ROBERT SEALY, APPELLANT

	V.

	WEST TEXAS TRUCK CENTER D/B/A

	AMARILLO TRUCK CENTER, INC., APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF POTTER COUNTY;

	NO. 91255-1; HONORABLE W. F. ROBERTS, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Appellant, Robert Sealy, appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee, West Texas Truck Center, Inc. (hereinafter, “West Texas”).  We affirm.

	Sealy filed suit against West Texas alleging violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act relating to repairs that West Texas performed on the transmission of Sealy’s 1998 Volvo truck.  After adequate time for discovery, West Texas filed a Motion for Summary Judgment.  In its motion, West Texas alleged both traditional and no evidence grounds for summary judgment.  In response to this Motion, Sealy filed an affidavit.  After hearing, the trial court entered orders granting West Texas’s objection to the affidavit and motion for summary judgment.

	By four issues, Sealy contends that the trial court erred in excluding Sealy’s affidavit on the basis of curable formal defects without allowing Sealy an opportunity to amend, denying Sealy’s Motion to Amend before granting summary judgment, denying Sealy leave to amend before granting summary judgment, and denying Sealy’s Motion for New Trial.  None of Sealy’s appellate issues generally challenge the trial court’s grant of summary judgment nor do they challenge any of the specific grounds asserted by West Texas in its Motion for Summary Judgment.  Thus, the issue of whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of West Texas is not properly before this court.

	On appeal, Sealy does not present an issue challenging the granting of summary judgment by a general allegation that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment.  Neither does Sealy present issues and argument demonstrating that genuine issues of material fact precluded the trial court’s grant of summary judgment as to each ground raised in West Texas’s motion.   As such, Sealy has failed to “assign error” to the trial court’s grant of summary judgment and, therefore, we must affirm the judgment of the trial court.  See Malooly Bros., Inc. v. Napier, 461 S.W.2d 119, 121 (Tex. 1970) (“The judgment must stand, since it may have been based on a ground not specifically challenged by the plaintiff and since there was no general assignment that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment.”); Strather v. Dolgencorp of Texas, Inc., 96 S.W.3d 420, 422-23 (Tex.App.–Texarkana 2002, no pet.).

	The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

							Mackey K. Hancock

							         Justice
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 16462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6943]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


In the Matter of Heli Electronics Corp., Order of Suspension of 
Trading

March 21, 2011.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Heli Electronics Corp. (``HELI''), a Nevada corporation with 
headquarters and operations in the People's Republic of China, which 
trades in the over-the-counter market under the symbol ``HELI.''
    Questions have arisen regarding the accuracy and completeness of 
information contained in HELI's public filings with the Commission 
concerning, among other things, the company's cash balances and 
accounts receivable. The company has failed to disclose that the 
company's independent auditor has resigned due to accounting 
irregularities involving (a) discrepancies between HELI's accounting 
records for cash balances and official bank statements obtained by the 
auditors from the company's bank, (b) discrepancies concerning the 
existence and location of company customers, and (c) the possibility 
that accounting records could have been falsified. Due to these 
irregularities, the company's auditor has resigned from its engagement 
to audit the company's consolidated financial statements for the year 
ended December 31, 2010, and has withdrawn its audit opinion issued 
June 15, 2010 relating to the audit of the company's consolidated 
financial statements as of December 31, 2009 and 2008.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above-listed company.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the above-listed 
company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT, March 21, 2011, 
through 11:59 p.m. EDT, on April 1, 2011.

    By the Commission.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-6943 Filed 3-21-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

________________________________ Case No. 5D2 4- 0310 LT Case No. 2012 -CF- 10916 -A

________________________________ R EYNALDO R. C ATO , Appella nt,
v. S TATE of F LORIDA , Appellee
.

_______________________________ 3.800 appeal from Circuit Court for Duval County. Tatiana Salvador, Judge. Reynaldo R. Cato, Lake City, pro se. No A ppearance for Appellee. M arch 5 , 2024 P ER C URIAM . A FFIRMED . See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a). E DWARDS , C.J., J AY , and E ISNAUGLE , JJ., concur.2 _____________________________ Not fin al until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CRISTIAN DAVID CARMONA QUINONEZ,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-2526

[January 12, 2023]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Bernard I. Bober, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 18-8209CF10A.

Cristian David Carmona Quinonez, South Bay, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 268 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the Federal Government should 

not bail out any State. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 27, 2019 

Mr. COTTON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Finance 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the Federal 

Government should not bail out any State. 

Whereas every State in the United States is a sovereign entity with a constitution and the authority to issue sovereign debt; 

Whereas the legislature of every State in the United States 

has the authority to reduce spending or raise taxes to pay 

the obligations owed by the State; 

Whereas officials in every State in the United States have the 

legal obligation to fully disclose the financial condition of 

the State to investors who purchase the debt of the State; 

Whereas Congress has rejected prior requests from creditors 

of a State for payment of the defaulted debt of a State; 

and 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 268 IS 

Whereas, during the financial crisis in 1842, the Senate requested that the Secretary of the Treasury report to the 

Senate with respect to any negotiations with any creditor 

of a State relating to assuming or guaranteeing any debt 

of the State, to ensure that promises of support by the 

Federal Government were not proffered: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that— 

2 (1) the Federal Government should take no ac3 tion to redeem, assume, or guarantee any debt, in4 cluding pension obligations, of a State; and 

5 (2) the Secretary of the Treasury should report 

6 to Congress any negotiations to engage in actions 

7 that would result in an outlay of Federal funds on 

8 behalf of creditors of a State. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE THE

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940

Release No. 35065 / December 12, 2023

In the Matter of:

Saratoga Investment Advisors, LLC

Saratoga Management Company LLC

Saratoga Investment Corp.

Saratoga Investment Corp. SBIC LP

Saratoga Investment Corp. SBIC II LP

Saratoga Investment Corp. SBIC III LP

Saratoga Investment Corp. CLO 2013-1 LTD

Saratoga Investment Funding II, LLC

SIA-Avionte, Inc.

SIA-AX, Inc.

SIA-GH, Inc.

SIA-G4, Inc.

SIA-MAC, Inc.

SIA-ARC, Inc.

SIA-PP, Inc.

SIA-TG, Inc.

SIA-TT, Inc.

SIA-Vector, Inc.

SIA-VR, Inc.

SIA-AAP, Inc.

Saratoga Credit Fund I L.P.

SIA-MDP Inc.

SIA-SZ, Inc.

535 Madison Avenue, 4th Floor

New York, NY 10022

(File No. 812-15459)

ORDER UNDER SECTIONS 17(d) AND 57(i) OF THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 

1940 AND RULE 17d-1 UNDER THE ACT
2

Saratoga Investment Advisors, LLC, et al. filed an application on April 25, 2023, and an 

amendment to the application on September 1, 2023, requesting an order under sections 17(d) 

and 57(i) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Act”) and rule 17d-1 under the Act that 

would permit certain joint transactions otherwise prohibited by sections 17(d) and 57(a)(4) of the 

Act and rule 17d-1 under the Act. The order would permit certain business development 

companies and closed-end management investment companies (collectively, the “Regulated 

Funds”) to co-invest in portfolio companies with each other and with certain affiliated 

investment entities.

On November 14, 2023, a notice of the filing of the application was issued (Investment 

Company Act Release No. 35047). The notice gave interested persons an opportunity to request 

a hearing and stated that an order disposing of the application would be issued unless a hearing 

was ordered. No request for a hearing has been filed, and the Commission has not ordered a 

hearing.

The matter has been considered and it is found, on the basis of the information set forth in the 

application, as amended, that participation by the Regulated Funds in the proposed transactions 

is consistent with the provisions, policies and purposes of the Act and is on a basis no less 

advantageous than that of other participants. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED, under sections 17(d) and 57(i) of the Act and rule 17d-1 under the Act, that 

the relief requested by Saratoga Investment Advisors, LLC, et al. (File No. 812-15459) is 

granted, effective immediately, subject to the conditions contained in the application, as 

amended.

For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, under delegated authority.

Sherry R. Haywood,

Assistant Secretary.
#### § 367.30 Cost accumulation system for associate companies.

Service companies must maintain a detailed classification of service costs, that permits costs to be identified with the functional processes of the associate companies served. To permit the classification, each service company must maintain a cost accumulation system, as described in Definitions § 367.1(a)(12), for accumulating reimbursable costs and charges to the associate companies served, and maintain time records for all service company employees in order to support the accounting allocation of all expenses assignable to the types of services performed and chargeable to the associate companies served. Service company employee records must permit a ready identification of the hours worked, account numbers charged, and other code designations that facilitate proper classification.
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OR EQUIVALENT

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report of Hitachi, Ltd. on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2007 (the Report) pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Exchange
Act and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



Toyoaki Nakamura, Senior Vice President and Executive Officer of Hitachi, Ltd., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Hitachi, Ltd.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |     |  |                                                              |  | 
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|Date:    June 26, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Toyoaki Nakamura                                        
|                       |  |     |  | Name:         Toyoaki Nakamura                              
|                       |  |     |  | Title:           Senior Vice President and Executive
Officer
Espíritu. 

Cuerpo. 

Desarrollando la comunidad a 

través de la salud y el bienestar. 

La salud y el bienestar exigen que se cuide a la persona en forma integral: mente, cuerpo y espíritu. Pero, debido a que 

siempre estamos ocupados, es posible que nuestro bienestar sea lo último que atendemos. 

Este año queremos que sea más fácil para usted y sus seres queridos poner su bienestar en primer lugar, haciendo que la 

vacunación contra la influenza esté más accesible. 

La influenza puede ser una enfermedad grave, hasta para la gente sana. Todas las personas desde los 6 meses en adelante 

deben vacunarse contra la influenza todos los años. 

Proteja a su familia, congregación y por ti mismo de recibir la vacuna contra la influenza. 

Si quiere saber más, 

visite www.cdc.gov/flu 

(Seleccione “En 

Español”) o llame al 

1-800-232-4636 

Mente. 

.Información de la clinica/logo aquí 

CS253728-I 

Para más información en español visite: 

http://www.cdc.gov/flu/ 

Departamento de 

Salud y Servicios Humanos 

Centros para el Control y la 

Prevención de Enfermedades 

14_253728-I_Smith_FLU-Desarrollando.indd 1 8/31/15 12:02 PM
### §469k–1. Transferred or Repealed

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 111–11, title VII, §7301, Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1213; Pub. L. 113–76, div. G, title IV, §429, Jan. 17, 2014, 128 Stat. 345; Pub. L. 113–235, div. F, title IV, §421, Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2449, which related to the American Battlefield Protection Program, was transferred in part and repealed in part. Subsec. (a) was transferred and is set out as a note under section 308101 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs. Subsecs. (b) and (c) were repealed and restated in sections 308101 to 308103 of Title 54 by Pub. L. 113–287, §§3, 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3094, 3272, which act enacted Title 54.
#### Ford *v.*Mayor and Council of Brunswick.

Atkinson, J.

The.Court of Appeals certified the following question: “Is. section 4 of the act approved December 23d, 1892 (Acts 1892, p. 213), amending the charter of Brunswick, unconstitutional and void in so far as it authorizes the mayor of the City of Brunswick to preside as judge in the police court of said city, he being a member of the legislative body of the city, because said section above referred to is in violation of article 1, section 1, paragraph 23, of the constitution of the State of Georgia (Civil Code, § 5720), which provides that ‘The legislative, judicial, and executive powers shall forever remain separate and distinct,, and no person discharging the duties of one shall at the same time'exercise the functions of either of the others, except as herein provided,’ in that said section allows the mayor., who is charged with legislative func*821tions, to exercise judicial' functions also by. presiding in the mayor’s court?” *Held,*that the provision of the constitution referred to relates to State legislative, judicial, and executive powers, and has no relation to municipal offices, created by the legislature, in the discharge of strictly municipal functions. Shafer *v.*Mumma, 17 Md. 331 (79 Am. D. 656); Waldo *v.*Wallace, 12 Ind. 569. On the general subject see 10 Century Digest, 1316 et seq., 1458 et seq.

July 14, 1910.

Constitutional question; from Court of Appeals.

*F. H. Harris,*for plaintiff in error.

*Bolling Whitfield,*contra.

*All the Justices concur.*
#### § 90.34 Annual maximum allowable reimbursement per participating Tribe.

Each participating Tribe will receive access to an equal portion of the funds set aside for maximum allowable reimbursements under § 90.33 (*e.g.,* 25 percent of the total funds available for the Tribal Reimbursement Program), unless their prior year expenses were less than the maximum amount, in which case they will be limited to the actual amount of their prior year expenses. Over the course of a calendar year, participating Tribes may draw down funds from the maximum allowable reimbursement as needed for eligible expenses as described in § 90.36. Participating Tribes are not required to provide documentation at the time they draw down from the maximum allowable reimbursement. Participating Tribes must provide a summary of eligible expenses at the end of the calendar year, which must identify actual expenditures eligible for reimbursement, including dollar amounts for each expenditure and how they were calculated, and must keep documentation on file to support each claimed expense. Such documentation must be sufficient to meet the standards that 2 CFR part 200 provides for grants.
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (File Nos. 2-99967, 33-35951, 333-04273, 333-10415, 333-107159,
333-175155, 333-18523, 333-38047, 333-41447, 333-89437, 333-72906, 333-36252 and 333-92531) of Hilton
Hotels Corporation and its subsidiaries of our report dated January 30, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Hilton Hotels Corporation and its subsidiaries
incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

|                                       |  | ERNST & YOUNG LLP
|-------------------------------------- |  | -----------------
|                                       |  |                  
|Los Angeles, California
March 11, 2004 |  |                  

---

QuickLinks
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

Washington, D.C. 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 92851 / September 1, 2021

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension of trading 

in the securities of AMAZING ENERGY OIL AND GAS, CO. (AMAZ) commencing at 9:30 

a.m. EDT on September 2, 2021 and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EDT on September 16, 2021.

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of the foregoing company due 

to a lack of current and accurate information about the company because it has not filed certain 

periodic reports with the Commission. This order was entered pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act).

The Commission cautions brokers, dealers, shareholders and prospective purchasers that they 

should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available 

information and any information subsequently issued by this company.

Brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11, at 

the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered relating to the securities 

of the subject company unless and until the broker or dealer has strictly complied with all of the 

provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is required by the rule, it 

should refrain from entering quotations relating to the securities of this company that has been 

subject to the trading suspension until such time as it has familiarized itself with the rule and is 

certain that all of its provisions have been met. Any broker or dealer with questions regarding

the rule should contact the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, DC 

at (202) 551-5777. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation which is in violation of the rule,

the Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement action. 

If any broker, dealer or other person has any information which may relate to this matter, they

should immediately communicate it to the Delinquent Filings Branch of the Division of 

Enforcement at (202) 551-5466, or by e-mail at DelinquentFilings@sec.gov.
### §45b. Rules and regulations; leases; fish and game

The said park shall be under the exclusive control of the Secretary of the Interior, whose duty it shall be, as soon as practicable, to make and publish such reasonable rules and regulations, not inconsistent with the laws of the United States, as he may deem necessary or proper for the care, protection, management, and improvement of the same, such regulations being primarily aimed at the freest use of said park for recreation purposes by the public and for the preservation from injury or spoliation of all timber, natural curiosities, or wonders within said park and their retention in their natural condition as far as practicable, and for the preservation of said park in a state of nature so far as is consistent with the purposes of this Act. Such rules and regulations shall permit the taking of fish by hook and line from the streams or lakes in said park, but at such seasons, during such times, and in such manner as may be directed by the Secretary of the Interior. Such rules and regulations, however, shall provide against the destruction of the wild life within said park, and the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to take all such measures as shall be necessary to fully carry out the objects and purposes of this Act. Said Secretary may, in his discretion, execute leases to parcels of ground not exceeding ten acres in extent at any one place to any one person or persons or company for not to exceed twenty years, when such ground is necessary for the erection of buildings for the accommodation of visitors. Such leases or privileges may be renewed or extended at the expiration of the terms thereof: Provided, That existing leases from the Department of Agriculture may be continued, in the discretion of the Secretary of the Interior, for so long as such extension is not detrimental to the public purposes for which the park is created.

(July 3, 1926, ch. 744, §2, 44 Stat. 820.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is act July 3, 1926, which is classified to sections 45a, 45b to 45e, and 688 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.