alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 99590 / February 23, 2024

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-21295

In the Matter of

Centaurus Financial, Inc., Ricky A. 

Mantei, and Atul Makharia,

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER APPOINTING 

TAX ADMINISTRATOR

On May 4, 2022, the Commission issued an Omnibus Order Directing the Engagement of 

Two Tax Administrators for Appointment on a Case-By-Case Basis in Administrative 

Proceedings that Establish Distribution Funds (the “Omnibus Order”).1 The Omnibus Order 

engaged Miller Kaplan Arase LLP and Heffler, Radetich & Saitta, LLP to serve as the 

Commission’s tax administrator (“Tax Administrator”), for selection and appointment on an 

individual case basis, for calendar years 2022 through 2024 in administrative proceedings where 

the distribution fund may incur tax-related obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) 

under the Department of the Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

The Director of the Division of Enforcement is authorized to appoint a Tax Administrator 

pursuant to the Omnibus Order.2 The Commission staff has requested the appointment of Miller 

Kaplan Arase LLP as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the Omnibus Order, Miller Kaplan Arase 

LLP is appointed as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding. For the 

Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.3

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 94845 (May 4, 2022).

2

 See Delegation of Authority to Director of the Division of Enforcement, Securities Act Rel. No. 10900 (Dec. 10, 

2020).

3

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(ii).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                          21,121
<SECURITIES>                                       470
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,048
<ALLOWANCES>                                       288
<INVENTORY>                                      3,321
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,148
<PP&E>                                         427,885
<DEPRECIATION>                                 112,977
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 393,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,435
<BONDS>                                        181,354
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            98
<OTHER-SE>                                     149,665
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   393,768
<SALES>                                         46,254
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               247,749
<CGS>                                           16,411
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  126,019
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                87,709
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   906
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,099
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,605
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,791
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,814
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    522
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,292
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.16
        

</TABLE>
#### Diana M. CAMPITELLI; John Andrew Noonan, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Edward CAMPITELLI; Patrick Cavanaugh, Defendants-Appellees, and Rebecca Gilliam, Private Process Server for defendant Patrick Cavanaugh, Defendant.

No. 02-1068.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 2002.

Decided May 22, 2002.

Diana M. Campitelli, John Andrew Noonan, Appellants Pro Se.

*947Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal the district court’s order dismissing this civil action for failure to state a federal cause of action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. *See Campitelli v. Campitelli,*No. CA-01-8738-L (D.Md. Dec. 14, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
### §410eeee–11. Authorization of appropriations

There are hereby authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary for the purposes of this subchapter, but not to exceed $20,000,000 for the acquisition of lands and interests in lands, and not to exceed $3,000,000 for development.

(Pub. L. 95–625, title XI, §1112, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3548; Pub. L. 99–500, §101(h) [title I, §116(b)], Oct. 18, 1986, 100 Stat. 1783–242, 1783–266, and Pub. L. 99–591, §101(h) [title I, §116(b)], Oct. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 3341–242, 3341–266; Pub. L. 99–590, title X, §1002, Oct. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 3340.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 460m–25 of this title.

Pub. L. 99–591 is a corrected version of Pub. L. 99–500.

#### Amendments

1986—Pub. L. 99–500, Pub. L. 99–590, Pub. L. 99–591, amended section identically substituting "$3,000,000" for "$500,000".
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 30, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
INCOME FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                     151,097,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              117,719,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                10,963,000
<INVENTORY>                                159,614,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           451,280,000
<PP&E>                                     127,832,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              40,017,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             540,979,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      117,011,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       951,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 416,677,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               540,979,000
<SALES>                                    171,989,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           171,989,000
<CGS>                                       95,801,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              140,993,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (375,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             30,621,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 9,646,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         20,975,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                20,975,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22
        

</TABLE>
#### § 35.177 Effect of unavailability of technical assistance.

A public entity shall not be excused from compliance with the requirements of this part because of any failure to receive technical assistance, including any failure in the development or dissemination of any technical assistance manual authorized by the Act.
### §470aaa–11. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this chapter.

(Pub. L. 111–11, title VI, §6312, Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1177.)
###### Editorial Note on Part 635

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 635 appear at 67 FR 75924, Dec. 10, 2002.

#### § 635.602 Definitions.

As used in this subpart:

*Best value selection* means any selection process in which proposals contain both price and qualitative components and award of the contract is based upon a combination of price and qualitative considerations. Qualitative considerations may include past performance, timeliness, reliability, experience, work quality, safety, or other considerations.

*Contracting agency* means the State department of transportation (State DOT), and any State or local government agency, public-private partnership, or Indian tribe (as defined in 2 CFR part 200) that is the acting under the supervision of the State DOT and is awarding and administering an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (ID/IQ) contract.

*ID/IQ* means a method of contracting that allows an indefinite quantity of services for a fixed time. This method is used when a contracting agency anticipates a recurring need but has not determined, above a specified minimum, the precise quantities of services that it will require during the contract period. Contractors bid unit prices for estimated quantities of standard work items, and work orders are used to define the location and quantities for specific work.

*ID/IQ contract* means the principal contract between the contracting agency and the contractor. Contracting agencies may use other names for ID/IQ contracts including job order contracting (JOC) contracts, master contracts, on-call contracts, push-button contracts, design-build ID/IQ contracts, design-build push button contracts, stand-by contracts, or task order contracts.

*JOC, or Job order contracting,* means a form of ID/IQ contracting that uses a unit price book in the solicitation and the bidder's adjustment factors or multipliers to establish contract prices.

*JOC contract* means a type of ID/IQ contract delivered using the JOC method. Requirements for ID/IQ contracts apply to JOC contracts unless otherwise specified in this subpart.

*NEPA process* has the same meaning as defined in § 635.502 of this part.

*Unit price book* means a book, guide, list, or similar document which includes defined construction tasks, and for each task, includes a unit of measure and a preset unit price.

*Work order* means the contract document issued for a definite scope of work under an ID/IQ contract. It defines the location, time, and scope of work required by the contracting agency. It also defines required pay items, quantities, and unit prices, as applicable. Contracting agencies may use other names for work orders including job orders, service orders, task orders, or task work orders.
§ 83.500 How are violations of this part determined for recipients other than individuals? A recipient other than an individual is in violation of the requirements of this part if the Attorney General or designee determines, in writing, that— ( a ) The recipient has violated the requirements of subpart B of this part; or
( b ) The number of convictions of the recipient's employees for violating criminal drug statutes in the workplace is large enough to indicate that the recipient has failed to make a good faith effort to provide a drug-free workplace.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>		5
<LEGEND>	This schedule is being restated and is to replace the previously
            provided schedule for the quarters ending April 3, July 3 and
            October 2, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>	1,000

<S>                       <C>            <C>            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>             3-MOS          6-MOS          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>         DEC-31-1998    DEC-31-1998    DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>              APR-03-1998    JUL-03-1998    OCT-02-1998
<CASH>                         15,953          6,813         22,821
<SECURITIES>                        0              0              0
<RECEIVABLES>                  73,516         73,225         77,011
<ALLOWANCES>                    4,254          4,268          4,746
<INVENTORY>                    26,719         26,686         24,092
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              139,461        134,202        143,622
<PP&E>                        248,035        254,479        258,665
<DEPRECIATION>                129,075        132,895        136,265
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                414,435        416,532        416,344
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          95,838         95,339         94,834
<BONDS>                       107,041        107,057        107,068
<COMMON>                       37,907         37,907         37,907
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0              0              0
<PREFERRED>                         0              0              0
<OTHER-SE>                    159,329        161,597        160,750
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  414,435        416,532        416,344
<SALES>                       170,176        330,230        504,999
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              170,176        330,230        504,999
<CGS>                         111,953        218,488        328,164
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 111,953        218,488        328,164
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    0              0              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0              0              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              1,824          3,688          5,650
<INCOME-PRETAX>                10,468         17,511         24,626
<INCOME-TAX>                    4,397          7,359         10,466
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             6,071         10,152         14,160
<DISCONTINUED>                      0              0              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0              0              0
<CHANGES>                           0              0              0
<NET-INCOME>                    6,071         10,152         14,160
<EPS-BASIC>                     .20            .33            .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                     .20            .33            .46


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



Certification





Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:



(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Monthly Income Fund II, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;



(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Monthly Income Fund II, L.P.





|By:    | Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation                         
|------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|       | General Partner                                                   
|       |                                                                   
|       |                                                                   
|       | /S/ Brenda G. Gujral                                              
|       |                                                                   
|Name:  | Brenda G. Gujral                                                  
|Title: | President of the General Partner and                              
|       | principal executive officer of Inland Monthly Income Fund II, L.P.
|Date:  | November 10, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 16432]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6858]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; Loan Repayment Program 2011.
    Date: April 30, 2011.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 10 a.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: JoAnn McConnell, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research, NINDS/
NIH/DHHS/Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Suite 3208, 
MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, 301-496-5324, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3a5759595554545f507a5453545e4914545352145d554c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="741917171b1a1a111e341a1d1a10075a1a1d1c5a131b02">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 16, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-6858 Filed 3-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### §430g–10. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of sections 430g–4 to 430g–10 of this title.

(Pub. L. 101–377, §7, Aug. 17, 1990, 104 Stat. 467.)
Stewart Gregg, AVP & Senior Counsel
Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America
5701 Golden Hills Drive
Minneapolis, MN  55416
(763) 765-2913

April 2, 2004

Board of Directors

Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America
5701 Golden Hills Drive
Minneapolis, MN  55416

Re:     Opinion and Consent of Counsel
        Allianz Life Variable Account B

Dear Sir or Madam:

You have requested my Opinion of Counsel in connection  with the filing with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, of Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form
N-4 for the  Individual  Deferred  Variable  Annuity  Contracts  to be issued by
Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America and its separate account,Allianz
Life Variable Account B File No. 333-111049.

I am of the following opinions:

1.  Allianz Life Variable Account B is a unit investment trust as that term is
    defined in Section 4(2) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the Act), and
    is currently registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
    pursuant to Section 8(a) of the Act.

2.  Upon the acceptance of purchase payments made by a Contract Owner pursuant
    to a Contract issued in accordance with the Prospectus contained in the
    Registration Statement and upon compliance with applicable law, such a
    Contract Owner will have a legally-issued, fully-paid, non-assessable
    contractual interest under such Contract.

You may use this opinion letter, or copy hereof, as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement.

I consent to the reference to me and to this opinion under the caption "Legal
Opinions" contained in the Statements of Additional Information which form a
part of the Registration Statement.

Sincerely,

ALLIANZ LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA

By: /s/ Stewart Gregg

    ------------------------------
        Stewart Gregg
§ 551.113 Counseling. ( a ) When consistent with institution security and good order, pretrial inmates may be allowed the opportunity to receive counseling services with convicted inmates.
( b ) Staff shall ensure that pretrial inmates who do not receive counseling services with convicted inmates have access to other counseling services.
### §427a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Apr. 14, 1926, ch. 138, §2, 44 Stat. 251, made appropriation of $2,500 for carrying out of provisions of section 427 of this title.
#### § 301.311 Expenses associated with appearance at committee hearing.

Federal Prison Industries, Inc., may not assume responsibility for any expenses incurred by the claimant, claimant's representative, or any witness appearing on behalf of the claimant in connection with attendance at the hearing, as well as any other costs relating to any representative, witnesses, or evidence associated with a hearing before the Committee.
ON REHEARING

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1342

ALFRED T. THOMAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.
CHRISTY T. MANN, Judge; MECKLENBURG COUNTY GENERAL DISTRICT & CIRCUIT COURTS; MCDOWELL STREET CENTER FOR FAMILY LAW, INCORPORATED; DONNA JACKSON; AIDA CORREA; PETER GORMAN; JAMES G. MIDDLEBROOKS; GRAHAM C. MULLEN; NORTH CAROLINA,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:08-cv-00502-FDW-1)

Submitted: July 23, 2009 Decided: January 14, 2010

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alfred T. Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Alfred T. Thomas appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil rights complaint based upon a previously
issued prefiling injunction. Although we initially dismissed
this appeal on the ground that Thomas failed to file a timely
notice of appeal, we granted Thomas’ petition for panel
rehearing * and now consider the merits of the appeal. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. Mann , No. 3:08-
cv-00502-FDW-1 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 23, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Because no member of the court called for a vote on Thomas’ petition for rehearing en banc, the petition was denied. See 4th Cir. R. 35(b).