alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 490.407 National performance management measures for assessing bridge condition. ( a ) There are three classifications for the purpose of assessing bridge condition. They are: ( 1 ) Percentage of NHS bridges classified as in Good condition;
( 2 ) Percentage of NHS bridges classified as in Fair condition; and
( 3 ) Percentage of NHS bridges classified as in Poor condition.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) To carry out the NHPP, two of the three classifications are performance measures for State DOTs to use to assess bridge condition on the NHS. They are: ( 1 ) Percentage of NHS bridges classified as in Good condition; and
( 2 ) Percentage of NHS bridges classified as in Poor condition.
( d ) Determination of Good and Poor conditions are described in § 490.409.
Served: January 22, 2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 22nd of January, 2014

NOTICE EXTENDING THE DEADLINE FOR PROPOSALS 

By Order 2013-12-14, December 23, 2013, the Department requested proposals for Essential Air 

Service (EAS) at the three communities named above, with proposals due no later than January

22, 2014. On January 17, 2014, The Thief River Falls Airport Authority requested a two-week 

extension to that deadline. 

We will grant the extension request. Proposals at Ironwood/Ashland, Thief River Falls, and 

Watertown are now due on February 5, 2014.

KEVIN D. SCHLEMMER

Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis Division

An electronic version of this document is available at

http://www.regulations.gov

Essential Air Service at

IRONWOOD, MICHIGAN/ASHLAND, WISCONSIN 

THIEF RIVER FALLS, MINNESOTA

WATERTOWN, SOUTH DAKOTA

Under 49 U.S.C. 41731 et seq.

Docket DOT-OST-1996-1266

Docket DOT-OST-2001-10642

Docket DOT-OST-2001-10644
§ 1225.11 Notification of compliance. ( a ) Beginning with FY 2004, NHTSA and FHWA will notify States of their compliance or noncompliance with the statutory and regulatory requirements of 23 U.S.C. 163 and this part, based on a review of certifications received. States will be required to submit their certifications on or before September 30, to avoid the withholding of funds in a fiscal year.
( b ) This notification of compliance will take place through FHWA's normal certification of apportionments process. If the agencies do not receive a certification from a State, by June 15 of any fiscal year, or if the certification does not conform to the requirements of 23 U.S.C. 163 and this part, the agencies will make an initial determination that the State is not in compliance.
### §3163. Effect on other laws

Except as specifically provided for in this subchapter, applicable law shall apply with respect to the authorization and administration of transportation or utility systems.

(Pub. L. 96–487, title XI, §1103, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2459.)
§ 2.60 Facilities and activities during an emergency—accounting treatment of defense-related expenditures. The Commission, cognizant of the need of the natural gas industry for advice with respect to the applicability of the Natural Gas Act and the Commission's regulations thereunder regarding activities and operations of natural gas companies taking security measures in preparation for a possible national emergency, sets forth the following interpretation and statement of policy: ( a ) *Facilities.* The definition of *auxiliary installations* in § 2.55(a) for which no certificate authority is necessary includes such defense-related facilities as ( 1 ) fallout shelters at compressor stations and other operating and maintenance camps;
( 2 ) emergency company headquarters or other similar installations; and
( 3 ) emergency communication equipment.
( b ) The Commission will consider reasonable investment in defense-related facilities, such as those described in paragraph (a) of this section, to be *prudent investment* for ratemaking purposes.
( c ) When a person, not otherwise subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission, files an application for a certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing the construction of facilities to be used solely for operation in a national emergency for the delivery of gas to, or receipt of gas from, a person subject to the Commission's jurisdiction, the Commission will consider a request by such applicant for waiver of the requirement to keep and maintain its accounts in accordance with the Uniform System of Accounts for Natural Gas Companies (parts 201 and 204 of this chapter) or to file the annual reports to the Commission required by §§ 260.1 and 260.2 of this chapter.
(Secs. 3, 4, 15, 16, 301, 304, 308, and 309 (41 Stat. 1063-1066, 1068, 1072, 1075; 49 Stat. 838, 839, 840, 841, 854-856, 858-859; 82 Stat. 617; 16 U.S.C. 796, 797, 803, 808, 809, 816, 825, 825b, 825c, 825g, 825h, 826i), as amended, secs. 8, 10, and 16 (52 Stat. 825-826, 830; 15 U.S.C. 717g, 717i, 717o))
[Order 274, 28 FR 12866, Dec. 4, 1963, as amended by Order 567, 42 FR 30612, June 16, 1977]
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 151 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 151

To authorize testimony, documents, and representation in United States 
                             v. Pratersch.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 9, 2019

  Mr. McConnell (for himself and Mr. Schumer) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To authorize testimony, documents, and representation in United States 
                             v. Pratersch.

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Pratersch, Cr. No. 19-26, pending in 
        the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, the 
        prosecution has requested the production of testimony from Greta Hasler, 
        an employee of the office of Senator Bernard Sanders;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to represent current and former Members and employees 
        of the Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request for 
        testimony relating to their official responsibilities;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, 
        be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the 
        Senate; and
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Greta Hasler, an employee of the Office of Senator 
Bernard Sanders, and any other current or former employee of the 
Senator's office from whom relevant evidence may be necessary, are 
authorized to testify and produce documents in the case of United 
States v. Pratersch, except concerning matters for which a privilege 
should be asserted.
    Sec. 2.  The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent 
Senator Sanders and any current or former employees of his office in 
connection with the production of evidence authorized in section one of 
this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
§ 8.1 Scope of regulations. ( a ) This part applies to all forfeitures administered by the Department of Justice with the exception of seizures and forfeitures under the statutes listed in 18 U.S.C. 983(i)(2). The authority of seizing agencies to conduct administrative forfeitures derives from the procedural provisions of the Customs laws (19 U.S.C. 1602-1618) where those provisions are incorporated by reference in the substantive forfeiture statutes enforced by the agencies.
( b ) The regulations in this part will apply to all forfeiture actions commenced on or after October 12, 2012.
# C_2011063EN.01002401.xml

| 26.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/24

---

Action brought on 11 January 2011 — European Commission v Republic of Estonia

(Case C-16/11)

2011/C 63/43

Language of the case: Estonian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and E. Randvere, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Estonia

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt all the necessary legal provisions to transpose Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2007 establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community, (1) or by failing to notify them to the Commission, the Republic of Estonia has failed to fulfil its obligations under the directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt all the necessary legal provisions to transpose Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2007 establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community, (1) or by failing to notify them to the Commission, the Republic of Estonia has failed to fulfil its obligations under the directive;

1

| — | order the Republic of Estonia to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Estonia to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposing the directive into national law expired on 15 May 2009.

---

(1)  OJ 2007 L 108, p. 1.

1

---
#### § 93.1 Purpose.

This part sets forth requirements and procedures to ensure that grants to States, State courts, local courts, units of local government, and Indian tribal governments, acting directly or through agreements with other public or private entities, exclude violent offenders from participation in programs authorized and funded under this part.
### §450ii–2. Continuation of leases, permits, and licenses

All leases, permits, and licenses issued or authorized by any department, establishment, or agency of the United States, with respect to the Federal lands excluded from the Joshua Tree National Monument by sections 450ii to 450ii–3 of this title, which are in effect on September 25, 1950, shall continue in effect, subject to compliance with the terms and conditions therein set forth, until terminated in accordance with the provisions thereof.

(Sept. 25, 1950, ch. 1030, §3, 64 Stat. 1035.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Abolition of Joshua Tree National Monument

Joshua Tree National Monument abolished and incorporated in Joshua Tree National Park, see section 410aaa–22 of this title.
§ 72.1 Purpose. ( a ) This part specifies the registration requirements of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), 34 U.S.C. 20901 *et seq.,* and the scope of those requirements' application. The Attorney General has the authority to specify the requirements of SORNA and their applicability as provided in this part pursuant to provisions of SORNA, including 34 U.S.C. 20912(b), 20913(d), and 20914(a)(8), (c).
( b ) This part does not preempt or limit any obligations of or requirements relating to sex offenders under other Federal laws, rules, or policies, or under the laws, rules, or policies of registration jurisdictions or other entities. States and other governmental entities may prescribe registration requirements and other requirements, with which sex offenders must comply, that are more extensive or stringent than those prescribed by SORNA.
#### § 74.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to implement section 105 of the Civil Liberties Act of 1988, which authorizes the Attorney General to locate, identify, and make payments to all eligible individuals of Japanese ancestry who were evacuated, relocated, and interned during World War II as a result of government action.
§ 115.241 Screening for risk of victimization and abusiveness. ( a ) All residents shall be assessed during an intake screening and upon transfer to another facility for their risk of being sexually abused by other residents or sexually abusive toward other residents.
( b ) Intake screening shall ordinarily take place within 72 hours of arrival at the facility.
( c ) Such assessments shall be conducted using an objective screening instrument.
( d ) The intake screening shall consider, at a minimum, the following criteria to assess residents for risk of sexual victimization: ( 1 ) Whether the resident has a mental, physical, or developmental disability;
( 2 ) The age of the resident;
( 3 ) The physical build of the resident;
( 4 ) Whether the resident has previously been incarcerated;
( 5 ) Whether the resident's criminal history is exclusively nonviolent;
( 6 ) Whether the resident has prior convictions for sex offenses against an adult or child;
( 7 ) Whether the resident is or is perceived to be gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, intersex, or gender nonconforming;
( 8 ) Whether the resident has previously experienced sexual victimization; and
( 9 ) The resident's own perception of vulnerability.
( e ) The intake screening shall consider prior acts of sexual abuse, prior convictions for violent offenses, and history of prior institutional violence or sexual abuse, as known to the agency, in assessing residents for risk of being sexually abusive.
( f ) Within a set time period, not to exceed 30 days from the resident's arrival at the facility, the facility will reassess the resident's risk of victimization or abusiveness based upon any additional, relevant information received by the facility since the intake screening.
( g ) A resident's risk level shall be reassessed when warranted due to a referral, request, incident of sexual abuse, or receipt of additional information that bears on the resident's risk of sexual victimization or abusiveness.
( h ) Residents may not be disciplined for refusing to answer, or for not disclosing complete information in response to, questions asked pursuant to paragraphs (d)(1), (d)(7), (d)(8), or (d)(9) of this section.
( i ) The agency shall implement appropriate controls on the dissemination within the facility of responses to questions asked pursuant to this standard in order to ensure that sensitive information is not exploited to the resident's detriment by staff or other residents.
#### § 905.2 Purpose and authority.

The purpose of this part 905 is to require each National Fingerprint File (NFF) participant to meet the standards set forth in the NFF Qualification Requirements as established by the Compact Council (Council). The Council is established pursuant to the National Crime Prevention and Privacy Compact Act (Compact), title 42, U.S.C., § 14616.
### §410www–6. Minimizing adverse impacts on preservation district

(a) In order to better integrate the east and west portions of the Martin Luther King, Junior, Preservation District, the Federal Highway Administration, in cooperation with the Georgia Department of Transportation, is hereby directed to insure that any design and reconstruction of the North Interstate 85 and Interstate 75 Expressway over Auburn and Edgewood Avenues in the city of Atlanta, Georgia, and the interchange at Edgewood Avenue, shall minimize the adverse impacts on the preservation district.

(b) In carrying out the provisions of this subsection, the Federal Highway Administration shall require that, where feasible, any major change required for the Auburn Avenue overpass results in a design which permits a wider distance between overpass support structures and the disposition of understructure development rights for appropriate business or recreation uses.

(c) Plans for the construction, exterior renovation, or demolition of any structure or change in land use within the preservation district by the National Park Service or any Federal agency must be submitted to the Atlanta Urban Design Commission in a timely fashion for its review and comment.

(Pub. L. 96–428, §7, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1842.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 460bbbb–6 of this title.
### §450ee–1. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–9, title II, §2203(g), Mar. 12, 2019, 133 Stat. 735.

Section, act Apr. 28, 1948, ch. 239, §2, 62 Stat. 204, related to the administration of Fort Sumter National Monument. See section 410aaaa of this title.
### §3605. Cooperation with other agencies and institutions

#### (a) Federal and State agencies; private institutions

In carrying out the provisions of the Convention, the Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior, may arrange for the cooperation of agencies of the United States and the States, and of private institutions and organizations.

#### (b) Use of Federal facilities; reimbursement

Appropriate agencies of the United States may cooperate in the conduct of scientific and other programs, and may furnish facilities and personnel, for the purposes of assisting the Organization in carrying out its duties under the Convention. Such agencies may accept reimbursement from the Organization for providing such services, facilities, and personnel.

(Pub. L. 97–389, title III, §306, Dec. 29, 1982, 96 Stat. 1953.)
### §1421e. Liability

#### (a) In general

A person who is authorized to respond to a stranding or entanglement pursuant to an agreement entered into under section 1382(c) of this title is deemed to be an employee of the Government for purposes of chapter 171 of title 28, with respect to actions of the person that are—

(1) in accordance with the agreement; and

(2) in the case of an unusual mortality event, in accordance with—

(A) the contingency plan issued under section 1421c(b) of this title;

(B) the instructions of an Onsite Coordinator designated under section 1421c(c) of this title; or

(C) the best professional judgment of an Onsite Coordinator, in the case of any matter that is not covered by the contingency plan.

#### (b) Limitation

Subsection (a) does not apply to actions of a person described in that subsection that are grossly negligent or that constitute willful misconduct.

(Pub. L. 92–522, title IV, §406, formerly title III, §306, as added Pub. L. 102–587, title III, §3003(a), Nov. 4, 1992, 106 Stat. 5064; renumbered title IV, §406, and amended Pub. L. 103–238, §24(b), (c)(3), (4), Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 565, 566; Pub. L. 117–263, div. J, title CIV, §10404, Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3984.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 117–263, in introductory provisions, inserted "or entanglement" after "to a stranding" and substituted "Government" for "government".

1994—Subsec. (a)(2)(A), (B). Pub. L. 103–238, §24(c)(3), (4), made technical amendment to references to section 1421c of this title to reflect renumbering of corresponding section of original act.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 1 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 1

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
relative to limiting the number of terms that a Member of Congress may 
                                 serve.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 3, 2019

Mr. Cruz (for himself, Mr. Rubio, and Mr. Lee) introduced the following 
joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
relative to limiting the number of terms that a Member of Congress may 
                                 serve.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission by the Congress:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. No person who has served 3 terms as a Representative 
shall be eligible for election to the House of Representatives. For 
purposes of this section, the election of a person to fill a vacancy in 
the House of Representatives shall be included as 1 term in determining 
the number of terms that such person has served as a Representative if 
the person fills the vacancy for more than 1 year.
    ``Section 2. No person who has served 2 terms as a Senator shall be 
eligible for election or appointment to the Senate. For purposes of 
this section, the election or appointment of a person to fill a vacancy 
in the Senate shall be included as 1 term in determining the number of 
terms that such person has served as a Senator if the person fills the 
vacancy for more than 3 years.
    ``Section 3. No term beginning before the date of the ratification 
of this article shall be taken into account in determining eligibility 
for election or appointment under this article.''.
                                 <all>
```
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-2787

_____________________________

JESSE PHILLIPS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.

Brantley S. Clark, Jr., Judge.

January 10, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, LEWIS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jesse Phillips, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for 

Appellee.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 

Release No. 10929 / February 22, 2021

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 91181 / February 22, 2021

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-17547

In the Matter of

WILLIAM J. SEARS

NOTICE THAT INITIAL DECISION HAS BECOME FINAL

The time for filing a petition for review of the initial decision in this proceeding has 

expired. No such petition has been filed by William J. Sears or the Division of Enforcement, and 

the Commission has not chosen to review the decision on its own initiative.

Accordingly, notice is hereby given, pursuant to Rule 360(d) of the Commission's Rules 

of Practice,1that the initial decision of the administrative law judge has become the final 

decision of the Commission with respect to William J. Sears.

2 The orders contained in that 

decision are hereby declared effective. The initial decision ordered that: (a) William J. Sears pay 

disgorgement in the amount of $9,762,000, but that payment of such disgorgement is deemed 

satisfied by the order of forfeiture and money judgment against Sears in United States v. William 

Sears, No. 1:16-cr-301 (D. Colo.); and (b) no civil penalty be imposed against William J. Sears. 

For the Commission, by the Office of the General Counsel, pursuant to delegated 

authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

 Secretary

 

1

 17 C.F.R. § 201.360(d).

2

 William J. Sears, Initial Decision Release No. 1405, 2020 WL 6742778 (Nov. 9, 2020).