alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §459a–2. Preservation of natural features; acquisition of additional property; reversion of property on failure of conditions

Except for certain portions of the area, deemed to be especially adaptable for recreational uses, particularly swimming, boating, sailing, fishing, and other recreational activities of similar nature, which shall be developed for such uses as needed, the said area shall be permanently reserved as a primitive wilderness and no development of the project or plan for the convenience of visitors shall be undertaken which would be incompatible with the preservation of the unique flora and fauna or the physiographic conditions now prevailing in this area: Provided, That the Secretary of the Interior may, in his discretion, accept for administration, protection, and development by the National Park Service a minimum of ten thousand acres within the area described in section 459 of this title, including the existing Cape Hatteras State Park, and, in addition, any other portions of the area described in section 459 of this title if the State of North Carolina shall agree that if all the lands described in section 459 of this title shall not have been conveyed to the United States within fifteen years from August 17, 1937, the establishment of the aforesaid national seashore recreational area may, in the discretion of the said Secretary, be abandoned, and that, in the event of such abandonment, the said State will accept a reconveyance of title to all lands conveyed by it to the United States for said national seashore recreational area. The lands donated to the United States for the purposes of sections 459 to 459a–3 of this title by parties other than said State shall revert in the event of the aforesaid abandonment to the donors, or their heirs, or other persons entitled thereto by law.

In the event of said abandonment, the Secretary of the Interior shall execute any suitable quitclaim deeds, or other writings entitled to record in the proper counties of North Carolina stating the fact of abandonment, whereupon title shall revert to those entitled thereto by law and no further conveyance or proof of reversion of title shall be required.

(Aug. 17, 1937, ch. 687, §4, 50 Stat. 670; June 29, 1940, ch. 459, §1, 54 Stat. 702; Mar. 6, 1946, ch. 50, 60 Stat. 32.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1946—Act Mar. 6, 1946, substituted "fifteen years" for "ten years" before "from August 17, 1937".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Words "national seashore recreational area" substituted in text for "national seashore" pursuant to act June 29, 1940.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
### §433f. Inconsistent laws repealed

The provisions of the Act of March 3, 1919 (ch. 116, 40 Stat. 1322–1324), and Acts supplemental thereof and amendatory thereto and all other Acts inconsistent with the provisions of section 433a to 433f of this title are repealed to the extent of such inconsistency.

(June 2, 1936, ch. 477, §6, 49 Stat. 1395.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The act of Mar. 3, 1919, and Acts supplemental and amendatory thereto were not classified to the Code.
§ 505.7 Eligibility. To be eligible for assistance under this program: ( a ) A project meeting the definition of an eligible project under 505.5 of this section located fully within one State shall have eligible project costs that are quantified in the project proposal as equal to or exceeding the lesser of: ( 1 ) $500,000,000; or
( 2 ) 75 percent of the amount of Federal highway assistance funds apportioned for the most recently completed fiscal year to the State in which the project is located.
( b ) A multi-State project meeting the definition of an eligible project under 505.5 of this section shall have eligible project costs that are quantified in the project proposal as equal to or exceeding the lesser of: ( 1 ) $500,000,000; or
( 2 ) 75 percent of the amount of Federal highway assistance funds apportioned for the most recently completed fiscal year to the State in which the project is located that has the largest apportionment.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
     CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JANUARY 31, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
     STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS 
     QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.  
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                             579,000
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,121,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                       229,000
<INVENTORY>                                     22,227,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,169,000
<PP&E>                                          36,323,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,474,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  97,986,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,693,000
<BONDS>                                         36,292,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            49,000 
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,719,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    97,986,000
<SALES>                                        121,960,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               121,960,000
<CGS>                                           92,294,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   92,294,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,577,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,254,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                       918,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                336,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       336,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.07
        


</TABLE>
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 60665 Summary Calendar

GURGIT SINGH, also known as Jurgit Singh

,

Petitioner

,

v ersus

.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. Attorney General

,

Respondent

.

Petition for Review of an Order of

t he Board of Immigration Appeals No. A 200 239 148

Before SMITH, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Gurgit Singh, a native and citizen of India

, petitions for review of the

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 23, 2014
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-60665 Document: 00512709368 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/23/2014N o. 13

- 60665

decis ion of the Board of Immigration Appeals ( “ BIA” ) affirming the decision of

an Immigration Judge ( “ IJ ” ) to deny Singh’s request for asylum and withhold

ing of removal. The IJ recited numerous inconsistencies upon which he based

his credibility finding, and the BIA recounted many of those inconsistencies in

its decision. Singh has not shown that the totality of the circumstances under

ly ing the credibility finding, as explained by the IJ and BIA, compel s a different

conclusion. See W a ng v. Holder

, 569 F.3d 531, 538 (5th Cir. 2009)

. The petition is DENIED.

2 Case: 13-60665 Document: 00512709368 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/23/2014
### §471g. Administration, protection, and development; use of natural resources

The area designated as the Cradle of Forestry in America shall be administered, protected, and developed within and as a part of the Pisgah National Forest by the Secretary of Agriculture in accordance with the laws, rules, and regulations applicable to national forests in such manner as in his judgment will best provide for the purposes of sections 471f to 471h of this title and for such management, utilization, and disposal of the natural resources as in his judgment will promote or is compatible with and does not significantly impair the purposes for which the Cradle of Forestry in America is established.

(Pub. L. 90–398, §2, July 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 342.)
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40263 Summary Calendar

GEORGE ELKINS, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus UNIDENTIFIED GABETH, Officer at Beto I Unit; UNIDENTIFIED SPAIN, Officer at Beto I Unit; CEAR SMITH, DR., at Beto I Unit; UNIDENTIFIED STEWART, DR., at Beto I Unit, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:95-CV-752

- - - - - - - - - - July 22, 1996 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * George Elkins, Texas prisoner # 570768, appeals from the magistrate judge’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). He argues that the magistrate judge abused her discretion in dismissing his § 1983 action as frivolous. We have reviewed the argument and theNo. 96-40263 - 2 - record and find no abuse of discretion in the dismissal. See Denton v. Hernandez , 504 U.S. 25, 31-32 (1992). Elkins’ appeal is without factual or legal basis and is thus frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Accordingly, his appeal is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. 5th Cir. 42.2. Elkins’ motions for production of documents and appointment of counsel on appeal are DENIED. We caution Elkins that any additional appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Elkins is cautioned further to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous because they have been previously decided by this
court.
APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTIONS DENIED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Telford 

Recreation 

Recreation Opportunities 

Area Dispersed Hiking Hunting 

Camping 

Powerline 

20 21 23 22 24 19 20 

19 

24 

Creston 

2 miles 21 22 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

M08-06-05 

Administered Land

 Bureau of Land 

Management 

Washington Dept. of

 Natural Resources 

Washington Dept. of

 Fish and Wildlife

 Private or Other 

LEGEND 

Transportation

 U.S. Highway

 Improved Road

 Other Road or Trail,

 Access as Designated 

Recreation

 Information

 Parking

 Restrooms 

2 

0.5 0 0.5 1.0 N 

MILES 

W E 0.5 0 0.5 1.0

KILOMETERS 

S 

U. S. Department of the Interior
 

Bureau of Land Management
 

Spokane District
 

1103 N. Fancher
 

Spokane, WA 99212
 

(509) 536-1200
 

It is unlawful to trespass on private lands. State hunting and fishing regulations 

apply to private lands. Landowners are not required to post or fence their lands. 

Check with private landowners before entering their property. 

Telford 

R

o

ad 

Sterett 

Road 

Ro

ad 

Knack Road 

Schuster 

Road

Tel or f d 

South 

Road 

Rux Road 

Bachelor 

Prairie 

Tracy 

Rock 

BURLINGTON 

NORTHERN 

R 34 ER 35 E R 35 ER 36 E

T 

25 

N 

T 

24 

N 

2 

2

 Hurley 

Lake 

Florence 

Lake 

Whittaker 

Lake

L

a

ke 

Creek

Swanson

 Lake 

Wildlife

 Management Unit 

8 9 

5 4 3 2 1 6 

7 

29 

20 21 23 

10 11 12

34 

27 26 

22 

35 32 

28 

36 

25 

24 

33 

19 

30 

31 

18 17 16 15 14 13

29 

34 

27 26 

32 35

28 

36 

25 

33 

30 

31 

29 

32 

30 

31 

8 9 

5 6 

7 

29 

20 21 

10 

34 

27 

22 

32 

28 

33 

19 

30 

31 

15 18 17 16

5 4 3 6 

5 

4 

3 

2 1 

6 

1 

1 

12 

36 

25 

24 

13 

36 

25 

Davenport 

5 miles 

Telford 

28 27 

T 

26 

N 

T 

25 

N 

33 

4 

34 

3

Rocklyn
### §460lll–23. Fees

#### (a) Authority

The Secretary shall charge reasonable fees, in consultation with the Advisory Board and consistent with the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act (16 U.S.C. 6801 et seq.), for admission to and the use of the designated sites, or for activities, within the Recreation Area.

#### (b) Factors

In determining whether to charge fees, the Secretary may consider the costs of collection weighed against potential income.

#### (c) Limitation

No general entrance fees shall be charged within the Recreation Area.

(Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(e) [title V, §523], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–231, 2681–315; Pub. L. 117–328, div. DD, title II, §201(d), Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5582.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is title VIII of div. J of Pub. L. 108–447, Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 3377, which is classified principally to chapter 87 (16 U.S.C. 6801 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of title VIII to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 6801 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 117–328 substituted "shall charge reasonable fees, in consultation with the Advisory Board and consistent with the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act (16 U.S.C. 6801 et seq.)," for "may charge reasonable fees".
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 272 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 272

   Congratulating the United States Women's National Soccer Team on 
                winning the 2019 FIFA Women's World Cup.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 9, 2019

 Mr. Wicker submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
         the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Congratulating the United States Women's National Soccer Team on 
                winning the 2019 FIFA Women's World Cup.

Whereas, on July 7, 2019, the United States Women's National Soccer Team won the 
        2019 FIFA Women's World Cup by defeating the Netherlands Women's 
        National Football Team;
Whereas, that victory marks the first time a country has won 4 Women's World Cup 
        titles;
Whereas, the United States Women's National Soccer Team began its historic run 
        with an overwhelming 13-0 victory, the largest ever winning margin in 
        the history of World Cup soccer;
Whereas, over the course of the month-long tournament, the United States Women's 
        National Soccer Team scored 26 goals, breaking the record the team set 
        in 1991 of 25 goals; and
Whereas the players of the United States Women's National Soccer Team presented 
        a shining example of sportsmanship, camaraderie, and skill to all people 
        of the United States and to the world: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) congratulates the United States Women's National Soccer 
        Team for winning an unprecedented 4 Women's World Cup titles 
        and for inspiring a new generation of youth in the United 
        States to strive for physical greatness and athletic 
        achievement; and
            (2) directs the Secretary of the Senate to transmit an 
        enrolled copy of this resolution to--
                    (A) Carlos Cordeiro, President of the United States 
                Soccer Federation; and
                    (B) Jill Ellis, Head Coach of the United States 
                Women's National Soccer Team.
                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal C 286/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 286 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6331 August 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 286

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6331 August 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 286/01 | Euro exchange rates — 28 August 2020 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 286/01

Euro exchange rates — 28 August 2020

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 286/02 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9560 – Gränges/Impexmetal) (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 286/03 | Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to a product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 | 4 |
| 2020/C 286/04 | Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to a product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 | 7 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2020/C 286/02

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9560 – Gränges/Impexmetal) (
  1
  )

1

2

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2020/C 286/03

Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to a product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33

4

2020/C 286/04

Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to a product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 214 ) ll-K-(I)-2 7 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:55 AM Sheet 214 of 325P. 2 

# A
II-K-(I)-2 7 PREMIU M O N NATURAL GA S A S A

BOILE RFUE L I

N TH E INDUSTRIA L SECTOR . EEA , Inc . Ma y 29 , 1979 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUN D I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITEM II-K-(I)-2 7
Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America
Stewart D. Gregg, Senior Securities Counsel
5701 Golden Hills Drive
Minneapolis, MN  55416-1297
(763) 765-2913

February 11, 2010

VIA EDGAR

Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Investment Management
Office of Insurance Products
100 F Street, NE
Washington, D.C. 20549


Re:     Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America
        Allianz Life Variable Account B
        File Nos. 333-164849 and 811-05618
        Accession # 0000836346-10-00007


Dear Sir/Madam:

On February 10, 2010, the above-referenced N-4 filing was filed via Edgar. The
purpose of this filing was to submit a Registration Amendment for a variable
annuity, File No. 333-139701, pursuant to Rule 485A. However, an initial
registration was filed instead, inadvertently, as a result of new EDGAR software
being used to submit the filing. We are hereby requesting withdrawal of the
previously accepted filing under Form Type RW and we will be resubmitting the
filing pursuant to Rule 485A.

Please contact me with any questions or comments you may have concerning the
enclosed. I may be reached at the following address and phone number: Allianz
Life, 5701 Golden Hills Drive, Mpls, MN 55416. Telephone: (763)765-2913.

Sincerely,

Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America




By: /s/ STEWART D. GREGG
------------------------------
### §470b. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 89–665, title I, §102, Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 916; Pub. L. 94–422, title II, §201(1), Sept. 28, 1976, 90 Stat. 1319; Pub. L. 96–515, title IV, §202, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2993; Pub. L. 99–514, §2, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2095; Pub. L. 102–575, title XL, §4009, Oct. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 4759; Pub. L. 106–208, §5(a)(5), May 26, 2000, 114 Stat. 318, related to requirements for awarding of grant funds. See sections 302901 and 302902 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Dennis Conroy, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Gilman + Ciocia, Inc., as
amended by this Form 10K/A (the "Report");

2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this Report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this Report any changes in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: June 15, 2006


                                                   /s/ Dennis Conroy
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Chief Accounting Officer