alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 9 (Thursday, January 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 2428]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-660]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PRESIDIO TRUST


Notice of Public Meeting

AGENCY: The Presidio Trust.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Sec.  103(c)(6) of the Presidio Trust Act, 
16 U.S.C. 460bb appendix, and in accordance with the Presidio Trust's 
bylaws, notice is hereby given that a public meeting of the Presidio 
Trust Board of Directors will be held commencing 6:30 p.m. on Monday, 
February 7, 2011, at the Golden Gate Club, 135 Fisher Loop, Presidio of 
San Francisco, California. The Presidio Trust was created by Congress 
in 1996 to manage approximately eighty percent of the former U.S. Army 
base known as the Presidio, in San Francisco, California.
    The purposes of this meeting are to approve minutes of a previous 
Board meeting, to provide the Chairperson's report, to provide the 
Executive Director's report, to provide project updates, and to receive 
public comment on other matters in accordance with the Trust's Public 
Outreach Policy.
    Individuals requiring special accommodation at this meeting, such 
as needing a sign language interpreter, should contact Mollie Matull at 
415.561.5300 prior to January 31, 2011.
    Time: The meeting will begin at 6:30 p.m. on Monday, February 7, 
2011.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Golden Gate Club, 135 Fisher 
Loop, Presidio of San Francisco.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Cook, General Counsel, the 
Presidio Trust, 34 Graham Street, P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, 
California 94129-0052, Telephone: 415.561.5300.

    Dated: January 5, 2011.
Karen A. Cook,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2011-660 Filed 1-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-4R-P
Even healthy people can get the flu, and it can be serious. 

Everyone 6 months and older should get a flu vaccine.

Help protect Alaska from the flu.

Get vaccinated.

For more information, visit http://www.flu.gov 

Lifeis

 a delicate

 balance.

Your flu vaccine protects me. 

My flu vaccine protects you.

CS212299-T
### §§460b, 460c. Repealed. Pub. L. 85–767, §2 [19, 21, 23, 33], Aug. 27, 1958, 72 Stat. 919

Section 460b, acts June 16, 1936, ch. 582, §5, 49 Stat. 1520; June 8, 1938, ch. 328, §8, 52 Stat. 635; Sept. 5, 1940, ch. 715, §9, 54 Stat. 870, related to determination of location of parkways upon public lands, national forests, or other Federal reservations.

Section 460c, act Sept. 7, 1950, ch. 912, §4(b), 64 Stat. 787, related to administration of parkway appropriations.
La limpieza y la desinfección son esenciales para limitar la exposición a los microbios y mantener un entorno 

seguro durante la pandemia del COVID-19. Reduzca la propagación de los microbios al mantener las 

superficies limpias y al recordarles a los estudiantes la importancia de la higiene de las manos. 

La diferencia entre limpieza y desinfección 

✓ La limpieza educe la cantidad de microbios, suciedad e impurezas en las superficies o los objetos; se hace 

mediante el uso de agua y jabón (o detergente) para remover físicamente los microbios de las superficies.

• La limpieza de superficies, seguida de la desinfección, es una de las medidas que forman parte de las 

mejores prácticas para la prevención del COVID-19 y otras enfermedades respiratorias virales.

✓ La desinfección mata (o inactiva) a los microbios en las superficies y los objetos. La desinfección funciona 

mejor con el uso de productos químicos (según las instrucciones) en las superficies, después de haberlas 

limpiado de manera adecuada. 

¿Cuáles desinfectantes debo usar?

Usted puede usar cualquier desinfectante aprobado por la EPA contra el COVID-19. Consulte epa.gov/listn o 

escanee el código QR con su teléfono para ver la lista de desinfectantes aprobados por la EPA.

Limpieza y desinfección en los salones de clase de las escuelas 

CS 319611-C1_ES 09/16/2020

¿Dónde debo limpiar y desinfectar?

Limpie y desinfecte las superficies y los objetos 

que se tocan frecuentemente en el salón de 

clases. Verifique si los productos se pueden usar 

en aparatos electrónicos.

Considere limpiar las superficies y los objetos 

que incluyan:

 Manijas y picaportes de puertas

 Escritorios y sillas

 Gabinetes, casilleros y estanterías

 Teclados y ratones de computadoras que 

se compartan

 Interruptores de luz

 Manijas de sacapuntas

 Lavamanos y alrededores 

 Mesones

 Aparatos electrónicos que se compartan, 

como impresoras

 Otros materiales didácticos que se 

compartan

¿Cuándo debo limpiar y desinfectar?

Limpie y desinfecte las superficies que se tocan con 

frecuencia al menos a diario o entre usos después 

de que cada estudiante las use. Limite el uso de 

objetos que se compartan, cuando sea posible, o 

limpie y desinfecte entre usos.

Entre las opciones para limpiar y 

desinfectar están:

 Por la mañana antes de que lleguen 

los estudiantes.

 Entre clases (si los estudiantes cambian de salón 

y mientras los estudiantes no estén presentes).

 Entre usos de las superficies y los objetos que 

se compartan. 

 Antes y después de servir alimentos.

 Antes de que los estudiantes regresen de 

recreos o descansos. 

 Después de que los estudiantes se vayan a 

la casa.

Guarde los productos de limpieza y desinfección fuera del alcance de los estudiantes. Los productos de 

limpieza y desinfección no deben ser usados por los estudiantes ni cerca de ellos, y el personal debe 

asegurarse de que haya una ventilación adecuada cuando use estos productos para prevenir que los niños o 

el mismo personal inhalen vapores tóxicos.

cdc.gov/coronavirus
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-12-0000541

22-APR-2015

09:01 AM
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 131950 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 131950 

 COA: 267782 
 Wayne CC: 74-006003

SAMUEL TILL, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 27, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d1120 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2006 

 Clerk
!	!			

"#$


			%			

%	%%!	

&'())%$

!#$

*

!	!			

+	!*!
$,#*

-#$

*(./()&0&/


12-#34

5*6#*7&8

    	


   	
	
   	    

  	

   
   	   	
	
   	

-9#5#2:#5
6# 	9#%;#,#

5,:&'())#,#1<!#=4#:5?#2,#:#9#?@#

#2##2,#:#9#?:-"?((***A)B&#:#C;#2

:## ,99 ;# 9# ;2# , --9"C;# #2

"#D
-#? 9" 

#2?*:#$
733))3

6:#E##9C;-*9:

	##9%C,-$%%



&.08

%",;$	&'(33

13')4333/3('(

Case 15-13242-BFK Doc 40 Filed 01/27/16 Entered 01/27/16 18:10:47 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
C292 2#2 5 .)F3	"#2?,#$5$; &&')& 1<
-#?G4 ;#

--9# 55:#2,#:#9#?,92#2#? 5,#,"6,-#9?5; C#2#C1&4

?5#2#?5#2"?#2#2"#?-#?#C2:#2?:?#5#2


-#?C#2:#D"#?#9# ;2#,#25,#C#

H,:##655:#2 ,#:#9#?,929$5,92#25,#2

5#29,#:I,# --*

#	$;$#2JJJJ?5JJJJJJJJJJ$&'(B*

JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ


*?

**
6,-#9?,#+,;

	 

JJKK#2?:#JJJJJJJJJJ

#2?:#$
733))3

6:#E##9C;-*9:

	##9%C,-$%%


**
&.08

%",;$;&'(33

13')4333/3('(

	

	


2,;9#5#2##25;;#;55:	,#:#9#?

5
-9#55:#2	,#:#9#?,"##?9:-9C#2

	:##('/--2",-9?-#

9,;!2:,25#$F808
,6
%$
,6$	&&'(.@#2	*2$)F33

2
;$7&$5$	&&')'@+#!*!",;$2!",;%C:$


**$(0F)2
;$,#&'($!9%$	&&('(/.3&B#2(F5+,?$&'(B*

JJKK#2?:#JJJJJJJJ

#2?:#$H,

Jan 20 2016 /s/ Robert G. Mayer

Entered on Docket:Jan 27 2016

Case 15-13242-BFK Doc 40 Filed 01/27/16 Entered 01/27/16 18:10:47 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3
262:9-?5#2###25C; 

#2?:#$H,

	##?5!#

	##9%C,-$%%



&.08

%",;$;&'(33

!2:,25#

F808
,6
%


,6$	&&'(.

"#

#2	*2$H,

)F332
;$7&

5$	&&')'

	##?5#2"#

+#!*!",;$,#

2!",;%C:$
**

(0F)2
;$,#&'(

!9%$	&&('(/.3&B

Case 15-13242-BFK Doc 40 Filed 01/27/16 Entered 01/27/16 18:10:47 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 14

- 00433

- CV

IN RE Alan and Audrey MERIN

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 25, 2014

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On June 19, 2014

, relators Alan and Audrey Merin filed a petition for writ of mandamus

complaining of the trial court’s discovery orders and an emergency motion for stay pending a

ruling on the mandamus petition. The court has considered the petition for writ of mandamus and

is of the opinion that r elators are not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ

of mandamus and the emergency motion for stay are denied

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2013

- CI

- 12338 , styled Alan Merin and Aud rey Merin v. Scott Tschirhart; The Tschirhart Law Firm, PC; Gary Gibson; Carabin and Shaw, PC; David Earl; Earl & Associates, PC; David Navarro; Hornberger Sheehan Fuller Beiter Wittenberg & Garza , pending in the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable David A. Canales presiding.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 16, 2020

b1013 

# Order

Clerk October 16, 2020

161945 & (43)

DEREK SHAW,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 161945

COA: 352851

Sanilac CC: 14

- 035535

- DM

ELIZABETH SHAW,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The

application for leave to appeal the August 12, 2020 order of the C ourt of Appeals is

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented

should be reviewed by this Court.
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications.
Title: Stratigraphy of the Washakie formation in the Washakie  Basin, Wyoming
Links  to : Report  |   Plates  1  | Plates 2
Sudocs  Number: I 19.3:1369
Item Number: 0620 (online)
System Number: 000997027
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  September 24,  2016  Page Name:  http://permanent.fdlp.gov/
  |
|--|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
### §460n–5. Regulation of area; violations and penalties

Such national recreation area shall continue to be administered in accordance with regulations heretofore issued by the Secretary of the Interior relating to such areas, and the Secretary may revise such regulations or issue new regulations to carry out the purposes of this subchapter. In his administration and regulation of the area, the Secretary shall exercise authority, subject to the provisions and limitations of this subchapter, comparable to his general administrative authority relating to areas of the national park system.

Any person who violates a rule or regulation issued pursuant to this subchapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and may be punished by a fine of not more than $500, or by imprisonment not exceeding six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment.

(Pub. L. 88–639, §6, Oct. 8, 1964, 78 Stat. 1040; Pub. L. 91–383, §10(a)(4), as added Pub. L. 94–458, §2, Oct. 7, 1976, 90 Stat. 1941.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 91–383, §10(a)(4), as added Pub. L. 94–458, struck out provisions relating to arrest powers of superintendent, caretakers, officers, or rangers of the Lake Mead National Recreation Area.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7097

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

SHERMAN LEWIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. W. Earl Britt, Senior

District Judge. (CR-87-53)

Submitted: March 23, 2000 Decided: March 29, 2000

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sherman Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Dickerson Kocher, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the notice of appeal was not filed in the district

court until July 7, 1999, for the purposes of this appeal we assume

that the date Lewis wrote on the notice of appeal is the earliest

date it would have been submitted to prison authorities. See

Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988).

2

PER CURIAM:

Sherman Lewis seeks to appeal an order of the district court

denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence under Fed. R. Crim. P. 35. The district

court’s order was entered June 15, 1999.

Under Fed. R. App. P. 4(b), Lewis had ten days from entry of

that order on the criminal docket to note his appeal. His notice

of appeal was dated June 28, 1999,* thirteen days after entry of

the order. The appeal periods of Fed. R. App. P. 4 are “mandatory

and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections,

434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361

U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Because Lewis failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal

period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 544.71 Exceptions to required literacy program participation. ( a ) The following inmates are not required to attend the literacy program: ( 1 ) Pretrial inmates;
( 2 ) Inmates committed for purpose of study and observation under the provisions of 18 U.S.C. 4205(c), 4241(d), or, effective November 1, 1987, 18 U.S.C. 3552(b);
( 3 ) Sentenced deportable aliens;
( 4 ) Inmates determined by staff to be temporarily unable to participate in the literacy program due to special circumstances beyond their control (e.g., due to a medical condition, transfer on writ, on a waiting list for initial placement). Such inmates, however, shall be required to participate when the special circumstances are no longer applicable.
( b ) Inmates who have been determined (on the basis of formal diagnostic assessment) to have a documented emotional, mental, or physical individual impediment to learning shall not be required to complete the literacy program beyond those achievement levels indicated as realistic by the formal diagnostic assessment.
( c ) Staff shall document in the inmate's education file the specific reasons for not requiring the inmate to participate in, or to complete, the literacy program.
Slip Op. 23-  UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE AJMAL STEEL TUBES & PIPES INDUSTRIES LLC, Plaintiff,
v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, WHEATLAND TUBE COMPANY, Defendant-Intervenor. Before: Jane A. Restani, Judge Court No. 21-00587

JUDGMENT Following remand, the United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) submitted the Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, ECF No. 43 (Jan. 26, 2023) (“Remand Results ”). Neither plaintiff Ajmal Steel Tubes & Pipes Industries LLC nor defendantintervenor Wheatland Tube Company submitted comments on the Remand Results. The Remand Results comply with the court ’ s remand order. Accordingly, it is ORDERED , ADJUDGED , and DECREED that the Remand Results by Commerce are SUSTAINED
. /s/ Jane A. Restani Jane A. Restani, Judge Dated: 0DUFK  , 2023 New York, New York
### §460ll–4. Filing of maps and descriptions

As soon as practicable after October 19, 1980, a map and legal description of the Rattlesnake National Recreational Area and a map and legal description of the Rattlesnake Wilderness shall be filed with the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the United States Senate, and such maps and legal descriptions shall have the same force and effect as if included in this subchapter: Provided, however, That correction of clerical and typographical errors in such legal descriptions and maps may be made.

(Pub. L. 96–476, §5, Oct. 19, 1980, 94 Stat. 2273.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs of the House of Representatives changed to Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives on Jan. 5, 1993, by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Third Congress.
§ 813.2 Guidance management process for CSOSA. All CSOSA guidance documents, as defined in § 813.1, require review and clearance in accordance with this section. CSOSA's guidance documents are created through the Office of Policy Analysis (OPA), and come in two primary forms, policy statements and procedures (also known as operating instructions). This section sets forth the process for review and clearance for each. ( a ) Policy statements are: ( 1 ) Prepared by CSOSA components and issued under the Director's signature;
( 2 ) Remain in effect and active until rescinded, amended, or superseded;
( 3 ) Are reviewed by all CSOSA Associate Directors or their designees;
( 4 ) Are prepared using a standard format provided by the Office of Policy Analysis (OPA);
( 5 ) Are developed and maintained using a four-stage process that includes planning, development, review, and maintenance, each stage taking place within specified timeframes; and
( 6 ) Are reviewed and re-certified biennially.
( b ) Procedures are: ( 1 ) Coordinated through OPA;
( 2 ) Evaluated to prevent the issuance of duplicative or conflicting procedures;
( 3 ) Tied to a policy statement;
( 4 ) Developed in a collaborative process that addresses all relevant stakeholders' input;
( 5 ) Organized so that critical information is readily accessible and staff know how and where to find any related information; and
( 6 ) Maintained in an archive system to ensure future decision-makers have adequate information regarding the basis for previous procedure determinations.
( c ) The CSOSA Director, or his/her designee, may waive or truncate the internal policy development process where good cause exists, for example where Congress or the executive branch mandates changes.
( d ) CSOSA will notify OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) regularly of upcoming guidance documents. Notification will include a list of planned guidance documents, including summaries of each guidance document and the agency's recommended designation of “not significant” or “significant” as defined in § 813.7.
( e ) CSOSA will seek significance determinations for guidance documents from OIRA. Where CSOSA preliminarily finds the guidance document to be significant, prior to publishing, CSOSA will provide the document to OIRA for review to determine if it meets the definition of “significant” under E.O. 13891.
Sun Microsystems CyberStore
                             Letter of Understanding


This Letter summarizes the mutual interest of I-Storm, Inc. ("ISTM") and Sun
Microsystems ("SUN") in exploring the possibility of forming a
distribution/reseller agreement to develop and operate a retail website under
the SUN name dedicated to selling SUN and compatible products to customers over
the Internet. This Letter of Understanding is strictly preliminary and is
intended primarily to establish a basis for possible future definitive
discussions. This Letter does not obligate either party to enter into a binding
agreement.

Business Purpose: To explore the possibility of developing and operating an
Internet website ("CyberStore") dedicated to exclusively selling SUN and
compatible products to retail customers for profit.

Authorization to Proceed with Feasibility Study: By signing this Letter, and
subject to the execution of an appropriate Confidentiality Agreement, SUN
authorizes ISTM to begin a Feasibility Study at ISTM's sole expense to analyze
SUN'S current infrastructure and business processes as a basis for forming a
CyberStore enterprise dedicated to SUN products. The intent of this study is to
create a business case for managing and maintaining the SUN's online commerce in
an outsource model. This study does not obligate SUN to move forward on the
formation of a CyberStore enterprise or any other relationship, but is intended
to provide a framework for future discussions, if any. Sun may terminate this
Feasibility Study at any time without subjecting Sun to any liability
whatsoever.


For I-Storm, Inc.                                For Sun Microsystems:

/S/ Steve Venuti                                 /S/ Bobbi Burns
----------------                                 ---------------

Title:  VP,GM                                    Title: Director, Web Commerce

12/7/98                                          12/4/98
-------                                          -------
Date                                             Date
#### § 511.305 Policy.

This part establishes the provisions and parameters for the Real-Time System Management Information Program for State DOTs, other responsible agencies, and partnerships with other commercial entities in establishing real-time information programs that provide accessibility to traffic and travel conditions information by other public agencies, the traveling public, and by other parties who may deliver value-added information products.