alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AAM-12-239-E 

March 15, 2012 

 Exemption No. 10479 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0208 

Ms. Sue Larsen 

AM Air Service, Inc. 

3011 Millstream Road 

Marengo, IN 60152 

Dear Ms. Larsen: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated February 17, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of AM Air Service, Inc. (AM Air Service), for an exemption from 

part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, 

would allow AM Air Service which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to 

cover its safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to AM Air Service. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into 

one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that 

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden 

the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 
2 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant AM Air Service, Inc., an exemption from 14 CFR 

part 120 to the extent necessary to allow AM Air Service, which is operating under separate 

parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, 

subject to the conditions and limitations described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of AM Air Service are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all 

times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

 2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the 

AM Air Service part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

This exemption terminates on March 31, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
umubo o bumahing

sa itaas ng iyong mga

manggas, hindi sa

iyong mga kamay.

Takpan ng tisyu

ang iyong bibig

at ilong kapag

umuubo o

bumabahing

Ilagay sa tapunan ng basura

ang iyong ginamit na tisyu.

Maaaring ipagamit sa iyo ang

maskarang pang-opera upang protektahan ang ibang mga tao.

o kaya

Itigil ang pagkalat ng mga mikrobyo na nagdudulot ng sakit sa iyo at sa ibang mga tao!

linisin ng dealkohol na panlinis ng kamay. 

Hugasan ng

sabon at tubig 

o kaya

Minnesota Department of Health

717 SE Delaware Street

Minneapolis, MN 55414

612-676-5414 or 1-877-676-5414

www.health.state.mn.us

Minnesota

Antibiotic 

Resistance 

Collaborative

pagkatapos umubo o bumahing. 

Takpan Ubo

Kamay

Linisin

ang iyong

ang iyong mga
§ 42.713 Exception; reasonable factors other than age. ( a ) A recipient may take an action, otherwise prohibited by § 42.710(a), that affects age groups differently, if such differentiation is based upon reasonable factors other than age.
( b ) This exception does not apply to the use of an explicit age distinction, but to conduct that has the effect of differentiating among age groups. This exception applies when the factor (other than age) upon which the recipient's action is based bears a direct and substantial relationship to the normal operation of or achievement of a statutory objective of the program or activity.
It’s not

too late!

Get your flu vaccine.

As long as flu viruses are circulating, 

it’s not too late to get vaccinated.

A yearly flu vaccine is recommended for everyone 

6 months and older.

Vaccination is especially important for protecting 

people at high risk of serious flu complications, 

including:

• young children

• pregnant women

• adults 65 years and older

• anyone with chronic health conditions like 

asthma, diabetes, or heart disease.

National Influenza Vaccination Week (NIVW)

December 1-7, 2019

www.cdc.gov/flu/nivw 

CS311775-B
#### § 541.66 Programs and services.

To the extent consistent with available resources and the security needs of the institution, an inmate in controlled housing status is to be considered for activities and privileges afforded to the general population. This includes, but is not limited to, providing an inmate with the opportunity for participation in an education program, library services, counseling, and religious guidance, as well as access to case management, medical and mental health assistance, and legal services, including access to the institution's law libraries. An inmate in controlled housing status should be afforded at least five hours weekly recreation and exercise out of the cell. The recreation shall be by himself or under close supervision. Unless there are compelling reasons to the contrary, institutions shall provide commissary privileges and reasonable amounts of personal property. The Warden may restrict for reasons of security, fire safety, or housekeeping the amount of personal property that an inmate may retain while in controlled housing status. An inmate shall be permitted to have a radio, provided it is equipped with ear plugs. Visits shall be carefully monitored.
ELECTRONIC RECORD

57W5

StO-tS

COA# 10-14-00219-CR OFFENSE: Habeas Corpus

STYLE: Ex parte Darrick Edward Rossv. COUNTY: Walker

TRIAL COURT: 278th District Court

TRIAL COURT #: 26383

TRIAL COURT JUDGE: Hon. Jerry A. Sandel

DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED

DATE: April 9, 2015

JUSTICE: Scoggins

PUBLISH:

PC S YES

DNP: YES

FOR REHEARING IS:

DATE:

JUDGE:

MOTION

CLK RECORD:

RPT RECORD:

STATE BR:

APP BR:

8/28/2014

8/26/2014

12/5/2014 - Anders

SUPPCLKRECORD:

SUPPRPTRECORD:

SUPP BR:

PROSE BR:

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS sin-if

ELECTRONIC RECORD

PRO SE Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: O^l/b/^Off ~

JUDGE: rM UjUIaO*—

CCA IS:.

JUDGE:

MOTION FOR REHEARING IN

ON

CCA#

Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

Y OF MAN

ON

PC:

DNP:

MOTION FOR STA DATE IS:

JUDGE:
### §428i. Protection of monuments, etc.

If any person shall willfully destroy, mutilate, deface, injure, or remove any monument, column, statue, memorial structure, or work of art that shall be erected or placed upon the grounds of the battlefield by lawful authority, or shall willfully destroy or remove any fence, railing, inclosure, or other work for the protection or ornament of said battlefield, or any portion thereof, or shall willfully destroy, cut, hack, bark, break down, or otherwise injure any tree, bush, or shrubbery that may be growing upon said battlefield, or shall cut down or fell or remove any timber, battle relic, tree, or trees growing or being upon such battlefield, except by permission of the Secretary of the Interior, or shall willfully remove or destroy any breastworks, earthworks, walls, or other defenses or shelter, or any part thereof, constructed by the armies formerly engaged in the battle on the lands or approaches to the battlefield, any person so offending shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof before any court of competent jurisdiction shall for each and every such offense be fined not less than $5 nor more than $100.

(Mar. 26, 1928, ch. 248, §10, 45 Stat. 368; Ex. Ord. No. 6166, §2, June 10, 1933; Ex. Ord. No. 6228, §1, July 28, 1933; Pub. L. 86–738, §§4, 5, Sept. 8, 1960, 74 Stat. 876.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Battlefield" substituted for "park" wherever appearing in text in view of redesignation of Fort Donelson National Military Park as Fort Donelson National Battlefield by Pub. L. 86–738. See section 428n of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Transfer of administrative functions of park, see note set out under section 428 of this title.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

March 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129972 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 129972 

 COA: 253805 

Genesee CC: 96-053792-FH 

TIMOTHY JAMES VEASLEY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 4, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0322 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 29, 2006 

Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

September 16, 2021

In the Matter of

Ngen Technologies Holdings Corp.,

File No. 500-1

ORDER OF SUSPENSION

OF TRADING

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Ngen Technologies 

Holdings Corp. (“NGRP1”) (CIK No. 1503161), a defaulted Nevada corporation located in 

Dallas, Texas with a class of securities registered with the Commission pursuant to Securities 

Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") Section 12(g) because it is delinquent in its periodic 

filings with the Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-Q for 

the period ended September 30, 2019. On July 2, 2021, the Commission’s Division of 

Corporation Finance (“Corporation Finance”) sent a delinquency letter to NGRP requesting 

compliance with its periodic filing requirements, but NGRP did not receive the delinquency 

letter due to its failure to maintain a valid address on file with the Commission as required by 

Commission rules (Rule 301 of Regulation S-T, 17 C.F.R. Section 232.301 and Section 5.4 of 

EDGAR Filer Manual). As of September 9, 2021, the common stock of NGRP was quoted on 

OTC Link operated by OTC Markets Group Inc. (formerly “Pink Sheets”) (“OTC Link”), had six

market makers, and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 

15c2-11(f)(3).

 

1 The short form of each issuer’s name is also its stock symbol.
2

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors 

require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company. Therefore, it is 

ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the 

securities of the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on 

September 17, 2021, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on September 30, 2021.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary
### §4307. Civil penalties

#### (a) Assessment

(1) The Secretary may issue an order assessing a civil penalty against any person who violates any prohibition contained in this chapter, any regulation promulgated pursuant to this chapter, or any permit issued under this chapter. Before issuing such an order, the Secretary shall provide such person written notice and the opportunity to request a hearing on the record within 30 days. Each violation shall be a separate offense, even if such violations occurred at the same time.

(2) The amount of such civil penalty shall be determined by the Secretary taking into account appropriate factors, including (A) the seriousness of the violation; (B) the economic benefit (if any) resulting from the violation; (C) any history of such violations; and (D) such other matters as the Secretary deems appropriate. The maximum fine permissible under this section is $10,000.

#### (b) Judicial review

Any person aggrieved by an assessment of a civil penalty under this section may file a petition for judicial review of such assessment with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia or for the district in which the violation occurred. Such a petition shall be filed within the 30-day period beginning on the date the order assessing the civil penalty was issued.

#### (c) Collection

If any person fails to pay an assessment of a civil penalty—

(1) within 30 days after the order was issued under subsection (a), or

(2) if the order is appealed within such 30-day period, within 10 days after court has entered a final judgment in favor of the Secretary under subsection (b),

the Secretary shall notify the Attorney General and the Attorney General shall bring a civil action in an appropriate United States district court to recover the amount of penalty assessed (plus costs, attorney's fees, and interest at currently prevailing rates from the date the order was issued or the date of such final judgment, as the case may be). In such an action, the validity, amount, and appropriateness of such penalty shall not be subject to review.

#### (d) Subpoenas

The Secretary may issue subpoenas in connection with proceedings under this subsection compelling the attendance and testimony of witnesses and subpoenas duces tecum, and may request the Attorney General to bring an action to enforce any subpoena under this section. The district courts shall have jurisdiction to enforce such subpoenas and impose sanctions.

(Pub. L. 100–691, §8, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4550.)
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Quotemedia, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Keith J. Randall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Keith J. Randall   
|    |  | Keith J. Randall       
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer
|    |  | August 13, 2010
Order entered January 2, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00629
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF S .C. AND K.C., CHILDR EN On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Cou rt

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 11
- 16417



### O RDER
The re porter’s record in this appeal has not been filed despite three orders to court reporter Glenda E. Finkley d irecting her to file it

. Because the appeal cannot proceed until the
issue of the reporter’s record is resolved , we ORDER Ms. Finkley to file the reporter’s record no later than January 17, 2018 . We expressly CAUTION Ms. Finkley that failure to comply with this order may result in an order that she not sit as a court reporter un til she complies.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send copies of this order to the Honorable David Lopez, Presiding Judge of the 256 th Judicial District Court; Ms. Finkley; and, the parties.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-20631

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SARAH MONTEBELLO,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(95-CR-114-1)

July 23, 1997

Before KING, DAVIS, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

On May 24 , 1995, Sarah Montbello was indicted for knowingly

devising and atte mpting a scheme and artifice to defraud

Nationsbank, a federally insured financial institution, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344. Montebello was accused of causing

another to (1 ) open a checking account at Nationsbank, Houston,

Texas, (2 ) deposit counterfeit checks into that account, and (3)2

make withdrawals from that account before the checks deposited had

cleared through the normal course of business. Montebello was

arraigned on June 19, 1995, and entered a plea of not guilty.

After a jury trial, Montebello was found guilty and sentenced to 33

months in prison, supervised release for three years, and a fine of

$7,545. Montebello appeals from the judgment of conviction and

sentence entered by the district court.

On appeal, Montebello asserts the following arg uments: (1)

the district court violated her right to a speedy trial under the

Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(c)(1); (2) the district court

abused its discretion by allowing the introduction of certain

extrinsic evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 40 4(b); (3) the district

court erred by failing to suppress evidence obtained as the fruits

of an allegedly illegal arrest; (4) the district court abused its

discretion by denying Montebello’s motion for mistrial based upon

an alleged impermissibly suggestive pretrial identification

procedure; (5) the district court clearly erred in determining that

Montebello was the leader/organizer of a criminal scheme involving

at least five participants; and (6) the district court clearly

erred in determining the amount of loss attributable to Montebello

for sentencing purposes.

We have carefully reviewed the br iefs, the reply brief, the

record excerpts, and relevant portions of the record itself. We

are satisfied that the judgment of the district court should, in3

all things, be AFFIRMED

.
### §433m. Authorization of appropriation

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of sections 433k and 433l of this title.

(June 29, 1936, ch. 863, §4, 49 Stat. 2029.)
(No. 83-CC-0281

#### Paul Wasserman, Claimant, *v.*The State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed October 13, 1982.*

Rosen and Rosen, Ltd., for Claimant.

Tyrone C. Fahner, Attorney General (William R. Wallin, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.

Poch, J.

On Saturday, March 6, 1982, the Claimant, Paul Wasserman, who resides at 1420 Jonquil Terrace, Chicago, Illinois, was arrested by the Illinois State Police acting pursuant to an arrest warrant issued by the circuit court of Cook County. The arrest was made on the complaint of the Department of Registration and Education which had charged a Paul Wasserman with practicing dentistry without a license. After being handcuffed and removed from his residence, he was placed in a squad car and driven to the Chicago office of the Department for further processing. Only after additional questions was there a determination made that the wrong Paul Wasserman had been arrested.

The State has stipulated that it caused the wrong Paul Wasserman to be arrested and has agreed that this claim should be settled for $5,000.00.

While this Court is not bound by the stipulation, such a stipulation will not be rejected out of hand. It appears that the parties have seriously considered the merits of this claim. Such being the case, the Court *884allows the stipulation of the parties.

It is hereby ordered that Claimant, Paul Wasserman, be awarded the sum of $5,000.00 as full and final satisfaction arising out of the arrest of the Claimant.
Help Protect Yourself and Others from COVID-19

Practice Social Distancing

Stay 6 feet (2 arm’s lengths) from other people.

And Wear a Cloth Face Covering

Be sure it covers your nose and mouth to help protect 

others. You could be infected and not have symptoms.

cdc.gov/coronavirus

Logos: HHS and CDC
File Nos.  333-145866
                                                                      811-05618
================================================================================

                                 UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
                                    FORM N-4

REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933                   ( )
            Pre-Effective Amendment No.                                   ( )
            Post-Effective Amendment No. 14                               (X)

REGISTRATION  STATEMENT UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940          ( )
            Amendment  No. 277                                            (X)

                      (Check appropriate box or boxes.)

     ALLIANZ LIFE VARIABLE ACCOUNT B
     ------------------------------------
        (Exact Name of Registrant)

     ALLIANZ LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
     ----------------------------------------------------
        (Name of Depositor)

     5701 Golden Hills Drive, Minneapolis, MN                         55416
     -------------------------------------------                     --------
     (Address of Depositor's Principal Executive Offices)           (Zip Code)

Depositor's Telephone Number, including Area Code               (763)  765-2913

     Name and Address of Agent for Service
     -------------------------------------
          Stewart D. Gregg, Senior Securities Counsel
          Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America
          5701 Golden Hills Drive
          Minneapolis,  MN    55416
          (763) 765-2913

IT IS PROPOSED THAT THIS FILING WILL BECOME EFFECTIVE (CHECK THE APPROPRIATE
BOX):

____ immediately upon filing pursuant to paragraph (b) of Rule 485

__X_ on December 11, 2009 pursuant to paragraph (b) of Rule 485

____ 60 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)(1) of Rule 485

____ on (date) pursuant to paragraph (a)(1) of Rule 485

IF APPROPRIATE, CHECK THE FOLLOWING:

__X_ this post-effective amendment designates a new effective date for a
     previously filed post-effective amendment.

APPROXIMATE DATE OF THE PROPOSED PUBLIC OFFERING:
December 11, 2009

TITLES OF SECURITIES BEING REGISTERED:
Individual Flexible Purchase Payment Variable Deferred Annuity Contracts

PARTS A, B and C WERE FILED IN REGISTRANT'S POST-EFFECTIVE AMENDMENT NO. 11 TO
FORM N-4 On July 21, 2009 AND ARE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE.