alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 544.31 Definitions. ( a ) *Leisure activities* are a wide range of activities in which inmates may participate when not performing assigned duties. Leisure activities include participation in organized and informal games, sports, physical fitness, table games, hobbycrafts, music programs, intramural activities, social and cultural organizations, movies, and stage shows. Religious activities, psychological services, and education classes are not included within this definition, except when they are used specifically to encourage knowledge, skills, and attitudes related to leisure activity involvement.
( b ) *Organized activities* are those activities accounted for by registration or roster of individual participants, and occur at a scheduled time and place.
( c ) *Art work* includes all paintings and sketches rendered in any of the usual media (oils, pastels, crayons, pencils, inks, and charcoal).
( d ) *Hobbycraft activities* include ceramics, leatherwork, models, clay, mosaics, crochet, knitting, sculptures, woodworking, lapidary, and other forms consistent with institution guidelines.
( e ) *Inmate wellness program activities* include screening, assessments, goal setting, fitness/nutrition prescriptions and counseling.
§ 35.163 Information and signage. ( a ) A public entity shall ensure that interested persons, including persons with impaired vision or hearing, can obtain information as to the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities.
( b ) A public entity shall provide signage at all inaccessible entrances to each of its facilities, directing users to an accessible entrance or to a location at which they can obtain information about accessible facilities. The international symbol for accessibility shall be used at each accessible entrance of a facility.
David W. Webster THE COMMON WEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS OF

F ICE OF COAS T AL ZONE MANAGEMENT 251 Causeway Street, Suite 800, Boston, MA 021 14·2136 (617) 626-1200 FAX: (6 17) 626-1240

March 1, 2012
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region I 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 Boston, MA 02109-3912

RE: CZM Federal Consist ency Review ofVessel General Permit (VGP) and Small Vessel General Permit (SVGP); Statewide.

Dear Mr. Webster: The Massachusetts Office ofCoastal Zone Management (CZM) is currently reviewing your proposal for a NPDES Vessel General Permit (VGP) and Small Vessel General Permit (SVGP) to ensure consistency with CZM enforceable program policies. Our formal review began on December 22, 2011 and a consistency determination would ordinarily be issued no later than February 22, 2012. However, as per the Coastal Zone Management Act Federal Consistency Regulations at 15 CFR 930.41(b) and 310 CMR 21.06(3)(e), CZM cannot complete its review and issue a decision until all applicable licenses, permits, certifications and other authorizations have beenissued. Ourrecords indicate that the MassDEP Section 401 Water Quality Certification for the proposed permit has notyet been issued. The Coastal Zone Management Act Federal Consistency Regulations at 15 CFR 930.41(b) allow for a stay in the sixty day review period, ifmutually agreed upon by both the applicant and the state agency. The permit review was previously extended to March 8, 2012. In order to facilitate the required 401 Water Quality Certification, we propose a second extension ofthe review period until July 16, 2012. CZM will need copies and documentation of all the required final MassDEP authorizations prior to the expiration of the stay period. Please indicate your agreement to this schedule by signing below and returning this letter to my attention. Ifyou have questions about the federal consistency review process, please contact me at the above address or (617) 626-1050. Ifyou have questions about the technical review ofthis project, please contactTodd Callaghan at (617) 626-1233.

OEVAL L
. PATRICK GOVERNOR TIMOTHY P. MURRAY LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR IAN A. BOWLES SECRETARY BRUCE K. CARUSLE ACTING DIRECTOR www.mass.govtczm 

# ®Sincerely,

Robert 

### L. Boeri ProjectReview Coordinator CZM# 8999,9000



# ~~~ **0~** David Webster U.S. EPA
Cc: JohnNagle, USEPA Bryant Finnin,DEPWorcester Todd Callaghan, CZM
May 29,2015 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

EC 

Av1alion Systems Englneenng Company 

Re: Amendment to Section 333 exemption #11509, docket# FAA-2015-0481 granted Aviation 

Systems Engineering Company and approved May 8, 20 15 

Dear Sir/Madam, 

Aviation Systems Engineering Company (ASEC) was issued exemption #11509 (the Exemption) 

under Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the Reform Act) for the purpose 

of conducting unmanned aircraft system (UAS) operations for technical demonstration and training 

purposes. ASEC hereby requests an amendment to the Exemption to include additional types of multirotor UAS for operation in full compliance with the conditions set forth within the Exemption. 

Additionally, ASEC requests an amendment to the Exemption to add collection of aerial imagery to its 

list of permissible uses for small UAS (sUAS) and shall remain in full compliance with the conditions set 

forth within the Exemption. 

ASEC requests permission to operate the following sUAS based on their type, size, weight, and 

speed under the same tetms and conditions contained within the Exemption and provided by the 

parameters set forth in regards to capabilities and limitations identified within each sUAS's user or flight 

operation manual hereto attached to this request. 

Aircraft Model Class Maximum 

Manufacturer Max Speed Takeoff Weight 

on Innovations Phantom 3 Rotorcraft, electric 2000 g 16 m/s 

DJI Innovations Phantom2 Rotorcraft, electric 1300 g 15 m/s 

DJI Innovations Spreading Wings S I 000 Rotorcraft, electric 11,000 g -

3D Robotics X8 Rotorcraft, electric 3360 g -

ASEC respectfully requests the same finding from the FAA as provided to Aerial Mob, LLC as to its 

amended exemption,# II 066A, docket ID FAA-2014-0353, dated February 2, 2015. The FAA found the 
Av1ohon Systems ErlQ1nee11ng Company 

amendment request was not precedent setting, that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the 

petition in the Federal Register, and that any delay in acting on the petition would be detrimental to the 

organization. 

Thank you for your time in regards to this petition and please send correspondence to: 

Brent Klavon 

ASEC, Inc. 

904-772-8442 

Brent.klavon!iiiasec-incorporaled.com 

On behalf of ASEC, I look forward to your response. 

Mike Ma rinan 

ASEC, In. 

Page 2 of2
§ 549.95 Determining “serious difficulty in refraining from sexually violent conduct or child molestation if released.” In determining whether a person will have “serious difficulty in refraining from sexually violent conduct or child molestation if released,” Bureau mental health professionals may consider, but are not limited to, evidence: ( a ) Of the person's repeated contact, or attempted contact, with one or more victims of sexually violent conduct or child molestation;
( b ) Of the person's denial of or inability to appreciate the wrongfulness, harmfulness, or likely consequences of engaging or attempting to engage in sexually violent conduct or child molestation;
( c ) Established through interviewing and testing of the person or through other risk assessment tools that are relied upon by mental health professionals;
( d ) Established by forensic indicators of inability to control conduct, such as: ( 1 ) Offending while under supervision;
( 2 ) Engaging in offense(s) when likely to get caught;
( 3 ) Statement(s) of intent to re-offend; or
( 4 ) Admission of inability to control behavior; or
( e ) Indicating successful completion of, or failure to successfully complete, a sex offender treatment program.
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 38 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed export to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the United 

Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland of certain defense articles and services. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the issuance of an export license with respect to the 

4 following proposed exports to the Kingdom of Saudi Ara5 bia and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and North6 ern Ireland is prohibited: 

7 (1) The transfer of the following defense arti8 cles, including services and technical data, described 

9 in Executive Communication 1422 (EC–1422) sub10 mitted to Congress pursuant to section 36(c) of the 

11 Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(c)) and 

12 published in the Congressional Record on June 3, 

13 2019: The proposed transfer of defense articles, de14 fense services, and technical data to support the 
2 

†SJ 38 ES 

1 manufacture of the Aurora Fuzing System for the 

2 Paveway IV Precision Guided Bomb Program. 

Passed the Senate June 20, 2019. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 38 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proservices. Northern Ireland of certain defense articles and and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and posed export to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
§ 1235.7 Parking space design, construction, and designation. ( a ) Each State shall establish design, construction, and designation standards for parking spaces reserved for persons with disabilities, under criteria to be determined by the State. These standards shall: ( 1 ) Ensure that parking spaces are accessible to, and usable by, persons with disabilities which limit or impair the ability to walk;
( 2 ) Ensure the safety of persons with disabilities which limit or impair the ability to walk who use these spaces and their accompanying accessible routes; and
( 3 ) Ensure uniform sign standards which comply with those prescribed by the “Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways” (23 CFR part 655, subpart F) to designate parking spaces reserved for persons with disabilities which limit or impair the ability to walk.
( b ) The design, construction, and alteration of parking spaces reserved for persons with disabilities for which Federal funds participate must meet the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards.
#### § 97.14 Guard-to-prisoner ratio.

Companies covered under this part must adhere to certain minimum standards with respect to the number of employees required to monitor violent prisoners during transportation. Private prisoner transport companies must ensure that at least one guard be on duty for every six violent prisoners transported. This requirement does not preclude a contracting entity from establishing more stringent guard-to-prisoner ratios.
§ 420.105 What is the FHWA's policy on use of FHWA planning and research funds? ( a ) If the FHWA determines that planning activities of national significance, identified in paragraph (b) of this section, and the requirements of 23 U.S.C. 134, 135, 303, and 505 are being adequately addressed, the FHWA will allow State DOTs and MPOs: ( 1 ) Maximum possible flexibility in the use of FHWA planning and research funds to meet highway and local public transportation planning and RD&T needs at the national, State, and local levels while ensuring legal use of such funds and avoiding unnecessary duplication of efforts; and
( 2 ) To determine which eligible planning and RD&T activities they desire to support with FHWA planning and research funds and at what funding level.
( b ) The State DOTs must provide data that support the FHWA's responsibilities to the Congress and to the public. These data include, but are not limited to, information required for: preparing proposed legislation and reports to the Congress; evaluating the extent, performance, condition, and use of the Nation's transportation systems; analyzing existing and proposed Federal-aid funding methods and levels and the assignment of user cost responsibility; maintaining a critical information base on fuel availability, use, and revenues generated; and calculating apportionment factors.
( c ) The policy in paragraph (a) of this section does not remove the FHWA's responsibility and authority to determine which activities are eligible for funding. Activities proposed to be funded with FHWA planning and research funds by the State DOTs and their subrecipients shall be documented and submitted for FHWA approval and authorization as prescribed in §§ 420.111 and 420.113. (The information collection requirements in paragraph (b) of § 420.105 have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under control numbers 2125-0028 and 2125-0032.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET, STATEMENT OF INCOME AND STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS CONTAINED IN FORM 10-K OF
ESSEX COUNTY GAS COMPANY FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                       82,017
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                        740
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                           9,042
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         4,241
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                     551
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  96,590
<COMMON>                                        21,805
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             16,515
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  38,296
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            28,199
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               6,825
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      675
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                        492
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                    59
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  22,044
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                   96,590
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       50,821
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             2,399
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      41,303
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      43,702
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          7,119
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 228
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   7,347
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         3,075
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,272
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    4,272
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         2,852
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        2,515
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           5,014
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.45
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0191

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

CHRISTOPHER PARIS STOCKDALE,

 Defendant and Appellant.

 O R D E R

_________________

This Court reviews briefs to ensure compliance with Rules 11 and 12 of the

Montana Rules of Appellate Procedure. After reviewing Appellant’s Opening Brief filed 

on July 20, 2022, this Court has determined that the brief does not comply with Rule 12 

and must be supplemented as provided below.

Pursuant to M. R. App. P. 12(1)(i), an appellant must attach an “appendix that

includes the relevant judgment, order(s), findings of fact, conclusions of law, jury

instruction(s), ruling(s), or decision(s) from which the appeal is taken together with any

written memorandum or rationale of the court” to an opening brief. Appellant’s brief 

does not contain an appendix or relevant documents. Accordingly, the Court accepts 

filing of Appellant’s Opening Brief, but requests the Appellant supplement his brief with 

the relevant document(s) from which he appeals.

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Appellant electronically submit a copy of the relevant 

document(s) from which his appeal is taken within ten (10) days of the date of this Order 

with the Clerk of this Court.

The Clerk is directed provide a true copy of this Order to the Appellant and to all

parties of record.

DATED this 21 day of July, 2022.

07/21/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0191
Electronically signed by:

Dirk Sandefur

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 21 2022
# Indented Bill of Materials

**V Body Sy** **stems Level**  **Sy mbol Name** 

**V-Brace Rear Battery**

**Final Washed asm Left 1**  **V-Brace Rear Battery Left Welding**  **2 V-Brace Rear Battery**  **Stamping Left 3**  V-Brace Rear Battery Stamped Material Left 2 V-W eld Nut Brace-Batt Rear **0 V Brace, Rear Battery**  **Right Final Washed Part 1**  **V-Brace Rear Battery Right Welding**  **2 V-Brace Rear Battery**  **Stamping Right 3**  V-Brace Rear Battery Stamped Material Right 2 V-W eld Nut Brace-Batt Rear

## Design Profit ®

Copyright 2005© Munro & Associates, Inc.**V-Brace Rear Battery Final Washed asm Left**  **V-Brace Rear Battery**

**Left Welding V-Brace Rear Battery** 

**Stamping Left** V-Brace Rear Battery Stamped Material Left V-Weld Nut Brace-Batt Rear **V Brace, Rear Battery Right Final Washed Part**  **V-Brace Rear Battery**

**Right Welding V-Brace Rear Battery** 

**Stamping Right** V-Brace Rear Battery Stamped Material Right V-Weld Nut Brace-Batt Rear

### Number

**V-Brace Rear Battery**

**Final Washed asm Left V-Brace Rear Battery** 

**Left Welding V-Brace Rear Battery** 

**Stamping Left**

V-Weld Nut Brace-Batt Rear **V Brace, Rear Battery , Right Final Washed Part**  **V-Brace Rear Battery**

**Right Welding V-Brace Rear Battery** 

**Stamping Right**

V-Weld Nut Brace-Batt Rear 

## Assembly Totals
**An aly**  **zed Subs:** 6 **Unanaly zed Subs:**  0

**Parts:** 4 **Fasteners:** 2 **Parts+Unanaly**

**zed:** 4

### Number

**V-Brace Rear Battery**

**Final Washed asm Left V-Brace Rear Battery** 

**Left Welding V-Brace Rear Battery** 

**Stamping Left** V-Brace Rear Battery Stamped Material Left V-W eld Nut Brace-Batt Rear **V Brace, Rear Battery , Right Final Washed Part**  **V-Brace Rear Battery**

**Right Welding V-Brace Rear Battery** 

**Stamping Right** V-Brace Rear Battery Stamped Material Right V-W eld Nut Brace-Batt Rear 

## Report Totals

### Qty **Material**



# 1 **Steel - 1008 1**  **1 Steel - 1008**  **1** 1 Commodity Prcing **1 1**  **Steel - 1008 1**  **Steel - 1008 1**  1 Commodity Prcing 

## Report Totals

**Piece Cost (Total):**
**Weight (Total):** 1.6520 lbPage 1 of 1

### Material

**Steel - 1008**

**Steel - 1008** Steel - 1008 Commodity Prcing

**Steel - 1008 Steel - 1008**  Steel - 1008 Commodity Prcing 

## Preassembled Totals **Analyzed Subs:** 0 **Unanalyzed Subs:** 0

**Parts:** 0 **Fasteners:** 0 **Parts+Unanalyzed:** 0

### Piece Cost **Weight Piece Cost**  **Weight (Total)**
**(Total)** 

# ## **0.8260 lb ##**  **0.8260 lb #**  **0.8260 lb #**  **0.8260 lb #**  **0.8260 lb #**  **0.8260 lb #**  **0.8260 lb #**  **0.8260 lb** # 0.0000 lb # 0.0000 lb **$0.67 0.8260 lb**  **$0.67 0.8260 lb**  **# 0.8260 lb**  **# 0.8260 lb**  **# 0.8260 lb**  **# 0.8260 lb**  **# 0.8260 lb**  **# 0.8260 lb**  # 0.0000 lb # 0.0000 lb
#### § 5.208 Disclosure of foreign principals.

A registrant who represents more than one foreign principal is required to list in the statements he files under the Act only those foreign principals for whom he is not entitled to claim exemption under section 3 of the Act.
### §3839bb–3. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–79, title II, §2708, Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 770

Section, Pub. L. 99–198, title XII, §1240P, as added Pub. L. 107–171, title II, §2502(a), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 267; amended Pub. L. 110–234, title II, §2604, May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1068; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title II, §2604, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1796, related to Great Lakes basin program for soil erosion and sediment control.
POWER OF ATTORNEY


         Each  person  whose  signature  appears  below  hereby  authorizes  and
appoints  Samuel  L.  Eichenfield  and  Bruno  A.  Marszowski,  and each of them
severally,  as his  attorneys-in-fact,  with  full  power  of  substitution  and
resubstitution,  to sign and file on his  behalf  individually  and in each such
capacity stated below, FINOVA Capital  Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K,
and any  amendments  thereto,  to be filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission,  the New York Stock Exchange, and otherwise, as fully as such person
could  do  in  person,   hereby   verifying   and   confirming   all  that  said
attorneys-in-fact, or their or his substitutes or substitute, may lawfully do or
cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Signatures                         Title                      Date
----------                         -----                      ----

Principal Executive 
Officer


 /s/Samuel L. Eichenfield          Chairman, President and      February 17,1998
----------------------------       Chief Executive Officer
Samuel L. Eichenfield



Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer


 /s/Bruno A. Marszowski             Senior Vice President-      February 17,1998
----------------------------        Controller and Chief
Bruno A. Marszowski                 Financial Officer



Directors


 /s/W. Carroll Bumpers                                          February 26,1998
----------------------------
W. Carroll Bumpers


 /s/Robert J. Fitzsimmons                                       February 17,1998
----------------------------
Robert J. Fitzsimmons


 /s/Gregory C. Smalis                                           February 17,1998
----------------------------
Gregory C. Smalis
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of A Better  Way  Financial
Corp.,  on Form  10-QSB for the period  ending  June 30,  2001 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, B. Stephen Bailey, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 74.8 Notification of payment.

The Administrator shall, when funds are appropriated for payment, notify an eligible individual in writing of his or her eligibility for payment. Section 104 of the Act limits any appropriation to not more than $500,000,000 for any fiscal year.