alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 635
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 635 appear at 67 FR 75924, Dec. 10, 2002.

§ 635.104 Method of construction. ( a ) Actual construction work shall be performed by contract awarded by competitive bidding; unless, as provided in § 635.104(b), the State DOT demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Division Administrator that some other method is more cost effective or that an emergency exists. The State DOT shall assure opportunity for free, open, and competitive bidding, including adequate publicity of the advertisements or calls for bids. The advertising or calling for bids and the award of contracts shall comply with the procedures and requirements set forth in §§ 635.112 and 635.114.
( b ) Approval by the Division Administrator for construction by a method other than competitive bidding shall be requested by the State in accordance with subpart B of part 635 of this chapter. Before such finding is made, the State DOT shall determine that the organization to undertake the work is so staffed and equipped as to perform such work satisfactorily and cost effectively.
( c ) In the case of a design-build project, the requirements of 23 CFR part 636 and the appropriate provisions pertaining to design-build contracting in this part will apply. However, no justification of cost effectiveness is necessary in selecting projects for the design-build delivery method.
( d ) In the case of a CM/GC project, the requirements of subpart E and the appropriate provisions pertaining to the CM/GC method of contracting in this part will apply. However, no justification of cost effectiveness is necessary in selecting projects for the CM/GC delivery method.
( e ) In the case of an ID/IQ project, the requirements of subpart F of this part and the appropriate provisions pertaining to the ID/IQ method of contracting in this part will apply. However, no justification of cost effectiveness is necessary in selecting projects for the ID/IQ delivery method.
[56 FR 37004, Aug. 2, 1991, as amended at 67 FR 75925, Dec. 10, 2002; 81 FR 86942, Dec. 2, 2016; 85 FR 72931, Nov. 16, 2020]
United States Court of Appeals 

For the First Circuit 

Nos. 18-1916 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Appellee, 

v. 

VAUGHN LEWIS, 

Defendant, Appellant. 

ERRATA SHEET 

 

The concurring opinion of Torruella and Thompson, Circuit 

Judges, issued on June 16, 2020, is amended as follows: 

On page 28 lines 9–12, change: 

"Unlike the Guidelines themselves, however, commentary to the 

Guidelines never passes through the gauntlets of congressional 

review or notice and comment." Id. at 386. 

To: 

Unlike the Guidelines themselves, however, commentary to the 

Guidelines is not required to pass through the gauntlets of 

congressional review or notice and comment. See id. at 386.
Protect the Circle of Life

Your Flu Vaccine Protects Me

My Flu Vaccine Protects You

 The flu vaccine is safe. You can’t get the flu from a flu vaccine.

 Pneumonia and flu are a leading cause of death among Native 

elders.

 Please get a flu vaccine each year to protect you and your family.

Learn more at www.cdc.gov/flu

or call 1-800-CDC-INFO
§ 367.50 Service company property to be recorded at cost. ( a ) All amounts included in the accounts for service company property must be stated at the cost incurred by the service company, except for property acquired by lease which qualifies as capital lease property under General Instructions in § 367.18, Criteria for classifying leases, and is recorded in Account 101.1, Property under capital leases (§ 367.1011).
( b ) When the consideration given for property is other than cash, the value of the consideration must be determined on a cash basis (*See, however,* Definitions § 367.1(a)(11)). In the entry recording the transaction, the actual consideration must be described with sufficient particularity to identify it. The service company must be prepared to furnish the Commission the particulars of its determination of the cash value of the consideration, if other than cash.
( c ) When property is purchased under a plan involving deferred payments, no charge must be made to the service company property accounts for interest, insurance, or other expenditures occasioned solely by such form of payment.
( d ) The service company property accounts must not include the cost or other value of service company property contributed to the company. Contributions in the form of money or its equivalent toward the construction of property must be credited to accounts charged with the cost of such construction. Property constructed from contributions of cash or its equivalent must be shown as a reduction to gross property constructed when assembling cost data for posting to property ledgers of accounts. The accumulated gross costs of property must be recorded as a debit in the plant ledger of accounts along with the related amount of contributions concurrently recorded as a credit.
# SEC Exempt Reporting Adviser Re
APPLICANT: JUAN ALBERTO DELEON APPLICATION NO. WR-74,669-03

APPLICATION FOR 11.07 WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

ACTION TAKEN

DISMISSED, SUBSEQUENT APPLICATION. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 4(a)-

(c).

JUDGE DATE
§ 803.1 Description. ( a ) The Agency seal of the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia (CSOSA or Agency) is described as follows: General George Washington's coat of arms in red and white bounded by an outline of the District of Columbia and superimposed upon a blue field together with the dome of the United States Capitol building in gold; encircled by a banner with the words “Community, Accountability, and Justice” and gold laurel branches, with gold edges bearing the inscription “COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY” above three stars at either side of the words “DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA” in smaller letters in the base; letters and stars in gold. A reproduction of the Agency seal in black and white appears as follows.
( b ) The Agency seal of the Pretrial Services Agency for the District of Columbia (PSA or Agency) is described as follows: Two crossed flags, the United States flag on the left and the District of Columbia flag on the right superimposed upon the United States Capitol dome and two laurel branches both in gold which appear on a blue field bearing a white banner edged and lettered in gold with the inscription “COMMUNITY, ACCOUNTABILITY, JUSTICE”; bearing the inscription “PRETRIAL SERVICES AGENCY” at the top, and “DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA” at the bottom surrounded by three gold stars on either side; letters and stars in gold. A reproduction of the Agency seal in black and white appears below.
[69 FR 21059, Apr. 20, 2004, as amended at 77 FR 59082, Sept. 26, 2012]
### §404c–2. Fugitives from justice

All fugitives from justice taking refuge in the park shall be subject to the same laws as fugitives from justice found in the Commonwealth of Kentucky.

(June 5, 1942, ch. 341, §2, 56 Stat. 317; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §39, 62 Stat. 992.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1948—Act June 25, 1948, struck out first sentence relating to inclusion of park in a judicial district. See section 97 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, and section 3231 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1948 Amendment

Section 38 of act June 25, 1948, provided that the amendment made by that act is effective Sept. 1, 1948.
### Attachments for Section 333 - Exeption/Rulemaking Submission (DJI sUAS documents too large to attach/upload using regulations.gov.) 

### • DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ User Manual 

### • http://download.dji-innovations.com/downloads/phantom_2_vision_plus/en/ Phantom_2_Vision_Plus_User_Manual_v1.8_en.pdf 

### • DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ Pilot Training Guide 

### • http://download.dji-innovations.com/downloads/phantom_2_vision_plus/en/ Phantom_2_Vision_Plus_Pilot_Training_Guide_v1.1_en.pdf 

### • DJI Inspire 1 User Manual 

### • http://download.dji-innovations.com/downloads/inspire_1/en/ Inspire_1_User_Manual_v1.2_en.pdf 

### • DJI Inspire 1 Safety Guidelines 

### • http://download.dji-innovations.com/downloads/inspire_1/en/ Inspire_1_Safety_Guidelines_en.pdf 

### • DJI Inspire 1 Maintenance Manual 

### • http://download.dji-innovations.com/downloads/inspire_1/en/ Inspire_1_Maintenance_ManualV1.0_en.pdf
### §429b–5. Funding limitations; contracting authority, etc.

#### (a) Effective date of authorizations

Authorizations of moneys to be appropriated under sections 429b to 429b–5 of this title from the Land and Water Conservation Fund for acquisition of properties and interests shall be effective on October 1, 1981.

#### (b) Authority limited by appropriations

Notwithstanding any other provision of sections 429b to 429b–5 of this title, authority to enter into contracts, to incur obligations, or to make payments under sections 429b to 429b–5 of this title shall be effective only to the extent, and in such amounts as are provided in advance in appropriation Acts.

(Apr. 17, 1954, ch. 153, §6, as added Pub. L. 96–442, §2, Oct. 13, 1980, 94 Stat. 1887.)
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 133 

Honoring the life and legacy of Elizebeth Smith Friedman, Cryptanalyst. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 1, 2019 

Mr. WYDEN (for himself and Mrs. FISCHER) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life and legacy of Elizebeth Smith Friedman, 

Cryptanalyst. 

Whereas Elizebeth Smith Friedman was born on August 26, 

1892, in Huntington, Indiana; 

Whereas, at 19 years of age, Friedman began to study Greek 

and English literature at Wooster College in Ohio and 

later graduated from Hillsdale College in Michigan after 

transferring there; 

Whereas Friedman stumbled upon her career as a 

codebreaker by accident after assisting with cipher research at the Riverbank facility of businessman George 

Fabyan; 

Whereas, in the 1920s, government agents recruited Friedman to break codes for the Coast Guard; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 133 ATS 

Whereas, based on her work, the Coast Guard subsequently 

asked Friedman to form a group to decrypt intercepts; 

Whereas, in the early 1930s, Friedman created and managed 

the first codebreaking unit ever to be run by a woman; 

Whereas, during World War II, Friedman and her team in 

the Coast Guard, working simultaneously with, but independently of, the well-known British codebreaking group 

led by Alan Turing, broke the Enigma G machine used 

by Germany, enabling the decryption of intercepted messages between German operatives in South America and 

their overseers in Berlin, thus stopping an alliance between Nazi Germany and countries in South America; 

Whereas Friedman co-authored several of the Riverbank Publications, which became the ‘‘textbook’’ for training individuals in the United States on encryption and 

codebreaking from the 1930s to the 1950s; 

Whereas J. Edgar Hoover of the Federal Bureau of Investigation took credit for the achievements of Friedman 

and her team, leaving her work widely unrecognized until 

after her death; 

Whereas, in the 1990s, to honor the contributions of both 

Friedman and her husband, who was also a codebreaker, 

the National Security Agency renamed its auditorium as 

the William F. Friedman and Elizebeth S. Friedman Memorial Auditorium; 

Whereas Elizebeth Smith Friedman continues to be a beacon 

of inspiration for women in the national security community and for women pursuing STEM-related fields; 

Whereas the work of individuals such as Elizebeth Smith 

Friedman distinctly shows how strong encryption technology can change the course of history; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 133 ATS 

Whereas Elizebeth Smith Friedman died on October 31, 

1980, leaving behind a legacy of remarkable skill and 

technical ingenuity, woven together to solve the most 

complex secret messages in the world: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate honors the life and con2 tributions of Elizebeth Smith Friedman, a pioneer in 

3 codebreaking. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
###### Editorial Note on Part 0

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

#### § 0.108 Redelegation of authority.

The Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Services may redelegate to any employee of the Service or the Department of Justice any of the powers, privileges, or duties conferred or imposed on the Commissioner by § 0.105. The Commissioner is authorized to confer or impose upon any employee of the United States, with the consent of the head of the Department or other independent establishment under whose jurisdiction the employee is serving, any of the powers, privileges, or duties conferred or imposed on the Commissioner by § 0.105. Existing redelegations by the Commissioner shall continue in force and effect until modified or revoked.

[Order No. 1150-86, 51 FR 31939, Sept. 8, 1986]
#### § 140.604 Reimbursable schedule.

Projects to be financed from other than Interstate funds shall be subject to a 36-month reimbursable schedule upon conversion to regular Federal-aid financing (See appendix). FHWA will consider requests for waiver of this provision at the time of conversion action. Waivers are subject to the availability of liquidating cash.
### §410zzz–1. Acceptance of funds

(a) In accordance with the Act entitled "An Act to create a National Park Trust Fund Board, and for other purposes", approved July 10, 1935 (49 Stat. 477), as amended, the National Park Trust Fund Board may accept from the Saint-Gaudens Memorial the amount of $100,000 and such additional amounts as the corporation may tender from time to time from the endowment funds under its control, which funds, when accepted, shall be utilized only for the purposes of the Saint-Gaudens National Historical Park established pursuant to this subchapter.

(b) Nothing in this subchapter shall limit the authority of the Secretary of the Interior under other provisions of law to accept donations of property in the name of the United States.

(Pub. L. 88–543, §2, Aug. 31, 1964, 78 Stat. 749; Pub. L. 116–9, title II, §2201(b)(2), Mar. 12, 2019, 133 Stat. 733.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Act entitled "An Act to create a National Park Trust Fund Board, and for other purposes", approved July 10, 1935, referred to in subsec. (a), is act July 10, 1935, ch. 375, 49 Stat. 477, which was repealed by Pub. L. 90–209, §2, Dec. 18, 1967, 81 Stat. 656.

#### Amendments

2019—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 116–9 substituted "Saint-Gaudens National Historical Park" for "historic site".
Docket No. 99121–Agenda 17–May 2005.

MARGARET VILL, Appellant, v. THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION et al. (Loyola University Medical Center, Appellee).

Filed December 1, 2005.

	PER CURIAM:  In this case, one Justice of this Court has recused himself and the remaining members of the Court are divided so that it is not possible to secure the constitutionally required concurrence of four judges for a decision (see Ill. Const. 1970, art. VI, §3). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. The effect of this dismissal is the same as an affirmance by an equally divided court of the decision under review but is of no precedential value. See People v. Griffith, 212 Ill. 2d 57, 58 (2004), citing Perlman v. First National Bank, 60 Ill. 2d 529, 530 (1975).

	Thomas, C.J., took no part.
§ 804.4 Submission and approval. ( a ) *Offender programs and equipment and vocational training services.* ( 1 ) Any person or organization wishing to donate as a gift in-kind contributions of space or hospitality to support offender programs, or equipment or vocational training services to educate and train offenders may submit the following information in writing to the Agency's Ethics Officer in the Office of the General Counsel: ( i ) The name of the person or organization offering the gift;
( ii ) A description of the gift;
( iii ) The estimated value of the gift;
( iv ) Any restrictions on the gift placed by the donor; and
( v ) A signed statement that the gift is unsolicited.
( 2 ) The Director, after consultation with the Agency's Ethics Officer, shall determine whether to accept or reject the gift.
( 3 ) CSOSA staff shall advise the person offering the gift of the Agency's determination, including, if applicable, the reason for rejection. Reasons for rejecting a gift include findings that: ( i ) There is a conflict of interest in accepting the gift;
( ii ) Acceptance of the gift is otherwise unlawful or would create the appearance of impropriety;
( iii ) Acceptance of the gift would obligate the Agency to an unbudgeted expenditure of funds; or
( iv ) Operation of the program, equipment, or vocational training services would not be practicable.
( b ) *Defendant programs and equipment and vocational training services.* ( 1 ) Any person or organization wishing to donate as a gift in-kind contributions of space or hospitality to support defendant programs, or equipment or vocational training services to educate and train defendants may submit the following information in writing to the Agency's Ethics Officer in the Office of the General Counsel: ( i ) The name of the person or organization offering the gift;
( ii ) A description of the gift;
( iii ) The estimated value of the gift;
( iv ) Any restrictions on the gift placed by the donor; and
( v ) A signed statement that the gift is unsolicited.
( 2 ) The General Counsel shall forward the request to PSA's Director with a recommendation whether to accept or reject the gift.
( 3 ) PSA staff shall advise the person offering the gift of the Agency's determination, including the reason for rejection. Reasons for rejecting a gift include findings that: ( i ) There is a conflict of interest in accepting the gift;
( ii ) Acceptance of the gift is otherwise unlawful or would create the appearance of impropriety;
( iii ) Acceptance of the gift would obligate the Agency to an unbudgeted expenditure of funds; or
( iv ) Operation of the program, equipment, or vocational training services would not be practicable.
___________________________________________________________________ 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Before the 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 97295 / APRIL 13, 2023 

WHISTLEBLOWER AWARD PROCEEDING 

File No. 2023-050 

_________________________________________________________________ 

In the Matter of the Claim for Award 

in connection with 

Redacted Redacted

Notice of Covered Action 

Redacted

ORDER DETERMINING WHISTLEBLOWER AWARD CLAIM 

Redacted ***

The Claims Review Staff (“CRS”) issued a Preliminary Determination recommending 

percent ( ***

that (“Claimant”) receive a whistleblower award of almost $1.9 million which is 

equal to %) of the amount collected in the above-referenced Covered Action 

(“Covered Action”). 

The recommendation of the CRS is adopted. The record demonstrates that Claimant 

voluntarily provided original information to the Commission and that this original information1

led to the successful enforcement of the Covered Action.2

1 The record reflects that the Claimant provided original information by using his/her specialized access and 

Redacted

knowledge to evaluate the facts in a case against the Company and its executives to identify 

potential violations of the U.S. securities laws. As such, Claimant was able to provide an evaluation, assessment, or 

insight beyond what would be reasonably apparent to the Commission from the publicly available information. See 

Securities Whistleblower Incentives & Protections, 76 Fed. Reg. 34300, 34312 (June 13, 2011). “Independent 

analysis” is defined under the Whistleblower Rules as one’s own “examination and evaluation of information that 

may be publicly available, but which reveals information that is not generally known or available to the public.” 

Rule 21F-4(b)(3). 

2 See Exchange Act Section 21F(b)(1), 15 U.S.C. § 78u-6(b)(1); Exchange Act Rule 21F-3, 17 C.F.R. § 240.21F-3. 
 

Redacted Redacted Redacted Redacted Redacted Redacted Redacted Redacted Redacted Redacted Redacted Redacted Redacted Redacted Redacted

In coming to this conclusion, the Commission considered that: Claimant used specialized 

access and expertise, Claimant expended efforts to identify the violations, Claimant’s tip alerted 

Enforcement staff to the alleged violations, and the conduct would have been difficult to detect 

in the absence of Claimant’s information. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Claimant shall receive an award of 

percent ( ***%) of the monetary sanctions collected in the Covered Action. 

***

By the Commission. 

Vanessa A. Countryman 

Secretary 

*

**

*

**

*

**
#### In the Matter of Mary McAllen, Respondent, against James Marshall et al., Constituting the Retirement Board of the Board of Education Retirement System of the City of New York, Appellants.

No opinion. Present'—Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

Washington, D.C. 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 92050 / May 27, 2021

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension of trading 

in the securities of XSport Global, Inc. (XSPT) commencing at 9:30 a.m. EDT on May 28, 2021 

and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EDT on June 11, 2021.

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of the foregoing company due 

to a lack of current and accurate information about the company because it has not filed certain 

periodic reports with the Commission. This order was entered pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act).

The Commission cautions brokers, dealers, shareholders and prospective purchasers that they 

should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available 

information and any information subsequently issued by this company.

Brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11, at 

the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered relating to the securities 

of the subject company unless and until the broker or dealer has strictly complied with all of the 

provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is required by the rule, it 

should refrain from entering quotations relating to the securities of this company that has been 

subject to the trading suspension until such time as it has familiarized itself with the rule and is 

certain that all of its provisions have been met. Any broker or dealer with questions regarding

the rule should contact the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, DC 

at (202) 551-5777. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation which is in violation of the rule,

the Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement action. 

If any broker, dealer or other person has any information which may relate to this matter, they 

should immediately communicate it to the Delinquent Filings Branch of the Division of 

Enforcement at (202) 551-5466, or by e-mail at DelinquentFilings@sec.gov.
Mete yon mask pou figi ki 

kouvri nen ou ak bouch 

ou. Epi kenbe distans ou 

(omwen 6 pye) avèk lòt 

moun lè ou kapab. 

Lave men ou souvan avèk 

savon ak dlo. Si savon 

ak dlo pa disponib, itilize 

yon dezenfektan pou men 

abaz alkòl.

Alèkile li pi enpòtan pase 

toutan pou pran yon vaksen 

kont grip. Tout moun ki gen 

laj 6 mwa oswa plis ta dwe 

pran yon vaksen kont grip 

chak sezon. 

Travay ou esansyèl!

Pwoteje tèt ou ak pwoteje lòt moun kont grip ak COVID-19 nan otòn 

sa ak nan ivè sa:

METE YON MASK LAVE MEN PRAN YON VAKSEN 

KONT GRIP

Aprann plis nan cdc.gov/flu

CS319348-W

Yon vaksen kont grip kapab pwoteje ou, moun pwòch ou yo, ak kòlèg 

travay ou yo kont grip.

Ou kapab pwoteje moun ki ozalantou ou tou si ou rete lakay ou lè ou malad.