alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Don’t let your germs 

go for a ride

Cover your coughs 

and sneezes 

with a tissue or use the inside of your elbow. 

If you use a tissue, throw it in the trash, and 

wash your hands right away.

cdc.gov/coronavirus

CS 317831-A July 20, 2020 9:09 AM

If you can’t wash your hands, ask 

your teacher or another adult 

for hand sanitizer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1322
In Re: JANISE ROSE SWEATMON, Debtor.

----------------------------- JANISE ROSE SWEATMON, Debtor - Appellant, versus OCWEN FEDERAL BANK, FSB, Defendant - Appellee, and NANCY L. SPENCER-GRIGSBY, Trustee.
No. 05-1323
In Re: JANISE ROSE SWEATMON, Debtor.

----------------------------- JANISE ROSE SWEATMON, Debtor - Appellant, versus- 2 - WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, Defendant - Appellee, and NANCY L. SPENCER-GRIGSBY, Trustee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA05-264-PJM; CA-05-265-PJM; BK-04-24686) Submitted: August 31, 2005 Decided: September 20, 2005 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Janise Rose Sweatmon, Appellant Pro Se. Bradford Scott Bernstein, MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, Rockville, Maryland; Lisa-Gail Kingsley Jenkins, HUESMAN, JONES & MILES, LLC, Hunt Valley, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: Janise Rose Sweatmon appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders: (1) denying her request for a continuance; (2) lifting the automatic stay and allowing a foreclosure to proceed; and (3) dismissing her bankruptcy petition with prejudice. Our review of the record and the opinions below discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeIn re Sweatmon , Nos. CA05-264-PJM; CA-05-265- PJM; BK-04-24686 (D. Md. filed Mar. 17, 2005 & entered Mar. 18, 2005). We grant Sweatmon’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, deny her motion for appointment of counsel, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### §410iiii–6. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated $1,250,000 to carry out the purposes of this subchapter including land acquisition and initial development.

(Pub. L. 102–525, title I, §107, formerly §106, Oct. 26, 1992, 106 Stat. 3439; renumbered §107, Pub. L. 117–123, §3(h)(1), May 12, 2022, 136 Stat. 1199.)
#### Clifford Darrell CARROLL v. Dr. George J. BETO, Director, Texas Department of Corrections.

Civ. A. No. 4-841.

United States District Court N. D. Texas, Fort Worth Division.

May 3, 1967.

Clifford Darrell Carroll, pro se.

MEMORANDUM ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS WITHOUT PREJUDICE

BREWSTER, District Judge.

Relator is presently confined in the Texas Department of Corrections pursuant to a sentence of death by electrocution imposed upon him following his conviction by a jury of the offense of murder with malice.

The application shows on its face that the relator has not attempted to exhaust any state post-conviction remedy presently available to him. Article 11.07 of the Vernon’s Ann. Texas Code of Criminal Procedure provides an effective post-conviction remedy which satisfies the dictates of Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293, 83 S.Ct. 745, 9 L.Ed.2d 770 (1963). The remedy afforded by Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure is presently available to the relator.

Because relator has failed to exhaust his presently available and effective state post-conviction remedies, he is not now entitled to a plenary hearing in this Court. Case v. State of Nebraska, 381 U.S. 336, 85 S.Ct. 1486, 14 L.Ed.2d 422 (1965); Key v. Holman, 5 Cir., 346 F.2d 153 (1965); Pate v. Holman, 5 Cir., 343 F.2d 546 (1965); Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 83 S.Ct. 822, 9 L.Ed.2d 837 (1963); 28 U.S.C.A., Section 2254.

It is therefore ordered that relator’s application for writ of habeas corpus be, and the same is hereby dismissed without prejudice.
### §460s–1. Description of area

The area comprising that particular land and water depicted on the map identified as "Proposed Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore, United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Boundary Map, NL–PR–7100A, July 1966", which is on file and available for public inspection in the office of the National Park Service of the Department of the Interior, is hereby designated for establishment as the Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore. An exact copy of such map shall be filed for publication in the Federal Register within thirty days following October 15, 1966.

(Pub. L. 89–668, §2, Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 922.)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration

      ( print page 15945)    
Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651, as amended by Pub. L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we invite comments on the question of whether instruments of equivalent scientific value, for the purposes for which the instruments shown below are intended to be used, are being manufactured in the United States.

Comments must comply with 15 CFR 301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations and be postmarked on or before April 11, 2011. Address written comments to Statutory Import Programs Staff, Room 3720, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C. 20230. Applications may be examined between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. at the U.S. Department of Commerce in Room 3720.

*Docket Number:*                     11-021.                     *Applicant:*                     Naval Postgraduate School, Department of Physics, 833 Dyer Rd., Monterey, CA 93943.                     *Instrument:*                     Electron Microscope.                     *Manufacturer:*                     FEI Company, Czech Republic.                     *Intended Use:*                     The instrument will be used to look at a range of semiconducting and other light emitting materials. It will be used to analyze the surface topography of the samples and the corresponding light emitted from the materials.                

*Justification for Duty-Free Entry:*                     There are no instruments of the same general category manufactured in the United States. Application accepted by Commissioner of Customs: March 1, 2011.                

Dated: March 16, 2011.

Gregory Campbell, 

Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office.

[FR Doc. 2011-6736 Filed 3-21-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
عالئم کروناویروس )کووید19-(

coronavirus/gov.cdc

06/02/2020 E316475-

با نشانههای کووید19- آشنا شویدکه ممکن است شامل موارد زیر باشد:

*اگر شخصی دچار نشانههای هشدار کووید19- است،

فوری از پزشک کمک بخواهید.

	 مشکالت تنفسی

	 درد مداوم یا احساس فشار در سینه

	 رسگیجه بیسابقه

	 ناتوانی در بیدار شدن یا بیدار ماندن

	 کبودی صورت یا لبها

رسفه لرز درد عضالنی

تنگی نفس یا

دشواری تنفس*

از دست رفنت ناگهانی حس

چشایی یا بویایی

گلودرد

عالئم بیامری ممکن است از خفیف تا شدیدمتغیر باشدو 14-2 روز پس از قرارگیری شام در

معرض ویروس عامل بیامری کووید19- ظاهر شود. 

این فهرست، همه نشانههای احتاملی را شامل منیشود. در صورت مشاهده عالئم شدید یا نگران کننده دیگر،

لطفا با ارائه دهنده خدمات درمانی خود متاس بگیرید.

تب
§ 2.78 Geriatric parole. ( a ) Upon receipt of a report from the institution in which the prisoner is confined that a prisoner who is at least 65 years of age has a chronic infirmity, illness, or disease related to aging, the Commission shall determine whether or not to release the prisoner on geriatric parole. Release on geriatric parole may be ordered by the Commission at any time, whether or not the prisoner has completed his or her minimum sentence. Consideration for geriatric parole shall be in addition to any other parole for which a prisoner may be eligible.
( b ) A prisoner may be granted a geriatric parole if the Commission finds that: ( 1 ) There is a low risk that the prisoner will commit new crimes; and
( 2 ) The prisoner's release would not be incompatible with the welfare of society.
( c ) The seriousness of the prisoner's crime, and the age at which it was committed, shall be considered in determining whether or not a geriatric parole should be granted prior to completion of the prisoner's minimum sentence.
( d ) A prisoner, or a prisoner's representative, may apply for a geriatric parole by submitting an application to the institution case management staff, who shall forward the application, accompanied by a medical report and any recommendations, within 30 days. The Commission shall render a decision within 30 days of receiving the application and report.
( e ) In determining whether or not to grant a geriatric parole, the Commission shall consider the following factors (D.C. Code 24-465(c)(1)-(7)): ( 1 ) Age of the prisoner;
( 2 ) Severity of illness, disease, or infirmities;
( 3 ) Comprehensive health evaluation;
( 4 ) Institutional behavior;
( 5 ) Level of risk for violence;
( 6 ) Criminal history; and
( 7 ) Alternatives to maintaining geriatric long-term prisoners in traditional prison settings.
( f ) A prisoner, the prisoner's representative, or the institution, may request the Commission to reconsider its decision on the basis of changed circumstances.
( g ) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section: ( 1 ) A prisoner who has been convicted of first degree murder or who has been sentenced for a crime committed while armed under D.C. Code 22-4502, 22-4504(b), or 22-2803, shall not be eligible for geriatric parole (D.C. Code 24-467); and
( 2 ) A prisoner shall not be eligible for geriatric parole on the basis of a physical or medical condition that existed at the time the prisoner was sentenced (D.C. Code 24-462).
[65 FR 45888, July 26, 2000, as amended at 68 FR 41530, July 14, 2003]
#### John Norfleet WARD, III, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ronald J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 01-7516.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 27, 2002.

Decided May 14, 2002.

John Norfleet Ward, III, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Eldridge Jeffrey, III, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

John Norfleet Ward, III, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his *132petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 *&*Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *See Ward v. Angelone,*No. CA-00-353-2 (E.D.Va. Aug. 23, 2001). Furthermore, while we grant Ward’s motion “to include newly discovered evidence for review with appeal,” our review of those materials does not alter our conclusion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
# Impacted Regulations **Part 60 –**  **Standards of Performance for New S** **tationary Sources (NSPS) Subpart A**  – General Provisions - Revisions to incorporate Uniform Standards and make other changes. **Subpart Ja**  – Petroleum Refineries – Reconsideration. **Subpart Jb** **(?)** – Petroleum Refineries - Refinery Greenhouse Gas Emissions. **Subparts K, Ka, and Kb** – Tanks - Revisions to incorporate Uniform Standard for Tanks and CVS/CD. **Subparts GGGa**  **and VVVa**  – Petroleum Refinery Equipment Leaks - Reconsideration and revisions to incorporate Uniform Standard for Equipment Leaks and CVS/CD. **Subpart QQQ** – Refinery Wastewater - Revisions to incorporate Uniform Standard for **Subpart QQQ** Refinery Wastewater Revisions to incorporate Uniform Standard for Wastewater and CVS/CD. 

## Part 61 **– National Emission Standards for Hazardous A** **ir Pollutants**  **Subpart A** – General Provisions - Revisions to incorporate Uniform Standards. **Subparts J and V** – Benzene Equipment Leaks - Reconsideration and revisions to incorporate Uniform Standard for Equipment Leaks, CVS/CD. **Subpart Y** – Benzene Tanks – Revisions to incorporate Uniform Standard for Tanks. **Subpart FF** – Benzene Wastes - Revisions to incorporate Uniform Standard for wastewater and CVS/CD and make other changes.

1

# Impacted Regulations

**Part 63 –**  **National Emission Standards for Hazardous A ir**  **Pollutants for Source Categories**  **Subpart A**  – General Provisions - Revisions to incorporate Uniform Standards and make other changes. **Subparts F, G, H (HON** ) – SOCMI Manufacturing - Revisions to incorporate Uniform Standards and make other changes. **Subpart CC**  – Petroleum Refineries 1- Residual Risk and Technology Review Revisions, Revisions to incorporate Uniform Standards. **Subparts XX and YY** – Ethylene - Residual Risk and Technology Review Revisions, Revisions to incorporate Uniform Standards. **Subpart UUU**  – Petroleum Refineries 2 - Residual Risk and Technology Review Revisions, Revisions to **Subpart** Petroleum Refineries Residual Risk and Technology Review Revisions, Revisions to incorporate Uniform Standards. **Subpart EEEE**  – Organic Liquid Distribution - Residual Risk and Technology Review Revisions, Revisions to incorporate Uniform Standards **Subpart DDDDD**  – Boilers and Process Heaters– Reconsideration 

## Part 65 **– Consolidated Federal A** **ir Rules**  **Subpart H**  - Uniform Standard General Provisions **Subpart I**  -Uniform StandardforTanks **Subpart J**  - Uniform Standardfor Equipment Leaks **Subpart K**  - Uniform Standardfor Wastewater **Subpart L**  - Uniform Standardfor Heat Exchangers **Subpart M**  - Uniform Standardfor Closed Vent Systems and Control Devices 2
(No. 83-CC-0416

#### State Employees’ Retirement System, Claimant, *v.*The State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 4, 1983.*

State Employees’ Retirement System, *pro se,*for Claimant.

Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General (William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.

Roe, C. J.

This cause comes on to be heard on the Respondent’s motion for reconsideration, due notice apparently *890having been given, and the Court being fully advised in the premises;

This is a claim by the State Employees’ Retirement System to recover from the Department of Mental Health and Development Disabilities a portion of the employees’ contribution to the retirement system which was said to have been underpaid by $286,004.39. On December 15, 1982, the Respondent agreed that said sum was due and owing based upon the departmental report and stipulated to the making of an award in the full amount sought. On January 11, 1983, we issued an order placing this claim on general continuance and ordered that more information be provided after noting several inconsistent, inaccurate, or incomplete statements in the departmental report. Respondent has now sufficiently supplied us with the information and explanations we requested. We know now what gave rise to this claim and do concur with the Respondent.

The departmental reports reveal that the balance remaining in the line item appropriation out of which this could have been paid was not sufficient to pay this obligation, but that there was available for transfer, had it been done in time, sufficient balances in other line item appropriations to have covered the cost of this obligation (had the allowable 2% been transferred for that purpose) as allowed by section 13.2 of “An Act relating to internal auditing in State government” (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 127, par. 149.2) and recognized in *Butterfield v.*State, 24 Ill. Ct. Cl. 85, as sufficient.

It is hereby ordered that the Claimant be awarded, in full satisfaction of any and all claims presented to the State of Illinois under the above captioned cause, the sum of two hundred eighty-six thousand four and 39/100 ($286,004.39).
Appendix F: Herbicide Risk Assessment Locator

Chemical Name Date Final Risk Assessment Selectivity

Aminopyralid 06/28/2007 SERA TR 052-04-04a Broad-leaf

Chlorsulfuron 11/21/2004 SERA TR 04-43-18-01c Broad-leaf

Clopyralid 12/05/2004 SERA TR 04-43-17-03c Broad-leaf

Dicamba 11/24/2004 SERA TR 04-43-17-06d Broad-leaf & 

woody

Glyphosate 03/25/2011 SERA TR 052-22-03b No

Imazapic 12/23/2004 SERA TR 04-43-17-04b

Some broadleaf and some 

grasses

Imazapyr 12/16/2011 SERA TR 052-29-03a No

Metsulfuron methyl 12/9/2004 SERA TR 03-43-17-01b Broad-leaf & 

woody

Picloram 09/29/2011 SERA TR 052-27-03a Broad-leaf & 

woody

Sethoxydim 10/31/2001 SERA TR 01-43-01-01c Grasses

Sulfometuron methyl 12/14/2004 SERA TR 03-43-17-02c No

Triclopyr 05/24/2011 SERA TR 052-25-03a Broad-leaf & 

woody

Nonylphenol 

Polyethoxylate (NPE)-

based surfactants

May 2003 USDA Forest Service, 

R-5, see website below No

Marker dyes used with 

herbicides 12/21/1997 SERA TR 96-21-07-03b No

The Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessments listed above are the versions used in 

preparation of this Environmental Assessment. These and additional risk assessments, and 

periodic updates are available at the website: www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/pesticide/risk.shtml

The Risk Assessment for NPE-based surfactants is available at the website: 

http://www.fs.fed.us/r5/spf/publications/npe-ra-final.pdf

The Environmental Impact Statement written for Noxious or Invasive Weed Treatment for the 

three northern Forests in Arizona (U.S. Forest Service, 2004, Feb.) includes an excellent 

discussion of evaluation of inert ingredients and surfactants in the herbicides proposed for use. 

For the most part, identification of these components of herbicide formulations is considered 

proprietary information and is not released. A literature review by the Forest Service found the 

names of some of the ingredients used for herbicides these three Forests proposed for use. In any 

case, entire formulations, not just active ingredients, are tested by the EPA before an herbicide 

may be approved for use.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **1 -**  **6 381** 

JEFF E RY E. SHORT ,
P laintiff

─ Appell ant ,

v.
CHARLES L. MANN, SR.; WILLIS J. FOWLER; ANDREW P. TERRELL; ROBERT C. LEWIS , Defendant s ─ Appell ees .

Appeal from t he United States District Court for the East ern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5 :0 9

- c t

- 0 3155

- BO )

Submitted : June 16 , 2011 Decided: June 21, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY , Circuit Judge s , and HAMILTO N, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirm ed by unpublished per curiam opinion

.

Jeffe r y E. Short , Appellant Pro Se

. Elizabeth F. Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina , for Appellee s .
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in th is circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Jeffe r y E. Short appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Short v. Mann , No. 5:09

- ct

- 03155

- BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 16,
2011) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
My name is Marshall Allen Johnson. I a member of the To 

Nizhoni Ani grassroots organization, based on Black Mesa in 

northeast Arizona on the Navajo (Dine) Reservation. 

I believe the EPA should be able to protect public health and 

safety, and this rule is a good start. However, I believe this rule 

does not go far enough. As EPA has said, the emissions from 

coal-fired power plants are harming human health. 

This is something the Navajo Nation knows far too well. The 

emissions from Navajo Generating Station and five other coalfired power plants in the region are harming tribal health. A 

host of respiratory illnesses plague those living on the Black 

Mesa from bronchitis to black lung disease. 6v) 

But it is not just the coal-polluted air we breathe that is making 

us sick. Many people know that Peabody Coal mines coal on the 

Black Mesa. But Peabody Coal is mining water, too, to supply its 

power plant and mining activities. The Navajo Sandstone 

aquifer which underlies the Black Mesa is the sole source of 

drinking water for Black Mesa and the western Navajo Nation. 

Not only is our water depleted and desecrated, our water, air 

and land are contaminated by all phases of coal use, from 

mining to so-called disposal of coal ash. All this to supply socalled low-cost energy and for the state of Arizona. 

For this rule to be effective, EPA should looks at all stages and 

impacts of the use of coal, other fossil fuels and nuclear power, 

for this all rolls into what comes out of the smokestacks, flows 
into the waters and winds up in the bodies of humans and all AsZAII 

4 

Greaturres5we-7stia-re the planet with-. 

In June of 2012, a founding member of To Nizhoni Ani, Nicole 

Horseherder, testified before a committee of the United States 

House of Representatives. 

She said: "The Navajo Nation is the size of Scotland. It is blessed 

with an abundance of resources that could provide the 

foundation necessary for a transition to renewable energy 

development. The Navajo Nation encompasses regions with 

ample wind, solar, and geothermal resources, along with vast 

expanses of land, including large reclaimed coal-mining tracts 

that are ideal for locating renewable energy facilities. The 

region's solar potential is some of the best in the world and 

certain portions of reservation lands have wind resource ratings 

capable of supporting utility-scale projects." 

My organization, To Nizhoni Ani, insists on a transition to 

renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind energy 

production, for health of the land, the

Al 

 .affithe biter and future 

generations. 

To reverse global warming, protect people's health and protect 

the planet, the EPA must do everything possible to advance 

truly cleaner renewable energies. 
C7 fAt rY1 IRAN) 

6tr-v(-(i Gi ft

vl-Nyvk 

06t 

-ek.,&e,ut cir? ovyid 

CArrife\- 

EPA. vo 

(ikyvtd 61/44 e -k"_e 

( 

yy\c C411 r 

bev ;kJ lovveksver 

IdtAA) 

6v".1 64-vi; 

vv\o( t 

ort 011 r 17,/0741Z_ 

no