alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Walnut  Valley  Ventures,
Inc., on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the
undersigned, B. Stephen Bailey, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

PRECISION FABRICS GROUP, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

TIETEX INTERNATIONAL LTD.,

Defendant-Appellee

______________________

2019-1751, 2019-1754

______________________

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

District of South Carolina in Nos. 7:17-cv-03037-TDS, 7:17-

cv-03038-TDS, Judge Thomas D. Schroeder.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

LYNNE A. BORCHERS, Sage Patent Group, PLLC, Raleigh, NC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented 

by PETER DANIEL SIDDOWAY; RICHARD A. COUGHLIN, Fox 

Rothschild LLP, Greensboro, NC.

 NEIL C. JONES, Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, 

LLP, Greenville, SC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also 

represented by WILLIAM S. BROWN, SAMUEL W. OUTTEN; 

ASHLEY BOLAND SUMMER, New York, NY.

 ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (LOURIE, MOORE, and REYNA, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

January 14, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court
### §460l–10a. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 88–578, title I, §9, formerly §8, as added Pub. L. 90–401, §4, July 15, 1968, 82 Stat. 355; amended Pub. L. 91–308, §3, July 7, 1970, 84 Stat. 410; renumbered §9, Pub. L. 92–347, §2, July 11, 1972, 86 Stat. 459, and amended Pub. L. 93–303, §3, June 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 194, related to contracts for acquisition of lands and waters. See section 200308 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.

A prior section 9 of Pub. L. 88–578 was renumbered section 10 and was classified to section 460l–10b of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 113–287.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE THE

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940 

Release No. 6339; July 5, 2023

ORDER CANCELLING REGISTRATIONS OF CERTAIN INVESTMENT ADVISERS 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 203(h) OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940

The investment advisers whose names appear in the attached Appendix, hereinafter referred 

to as the “registrants,” are registered as investment advisers pursuant to section 203 of the Investment 

Advisers Act of 1940.

On June 1, 2023, a notice of intention to cancel registrations of certain investment advisers, 

including the registrants, was issued (Investment Advisers Act Release No. 6322). The notice gave 

interested persons an opportunity to request a hearing and stated that an order or orders cancelling the 

registrations would be issued unless a hearing was ordered. No request for a hearing has been filed, 

and the Commission has not ordered a hearing.

The Commission has found that the registrants are no longer in existence, are not engaged in 

business as investment advisers, or are prohibited from registering as investment advisers under 

section 203A of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 203(h) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, that the 

registration of each of said registrants be, and hereby is, cancelled.

For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, pursuant to delegated 

authority.

Sherry R. Haywood,

Assistant Secretary.

[Appendix follows on next page]
APPENDIX:

SEC Number Full Legal Name

801-72074 BAY MUTUAL FINANCIAL LLC

801-75390 PROPHECY ASSET MANAGEMENT LP

801-71058 FUSION ANALYTICS INVESTMENT PARTNERS LLC

801-72514 PLATINUM MANAGEMENT (NY) LLC

801-67384 ASSET MANAGEMENT ADVISORY GROUP LLC

801-66695 COASTAL PARTNERS LTD.

801-70770 AZZARA THOMAS PETER

801-80422 MILLER, JOHN, STENNING

801-101538 KENT COSTELLO

801-107076 DVDENDO, INC.

801-112509 INVICTUS CAPITAL INVESTORS

801-108994 CAPITECT, INC.

801-112008 ALPHAMALL LLC

801-111893 BARREL PARK INVESTMENTS, LLC

801-114014 INVESTIFAI LLC

801-114489 SAVYON ASSET MANAGEMENT ADVISORY, LLC

801-117990 ALTERNATIVE ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC.

801-117752 VITA INTELLECTUS INSTITUTIONAL, INC.

801-118711 DAYUAN INFORMATION TECH LIMITED

801-119791 AN IDEAL LIFE FINANCIAL PLANNING, LLC

801-121726 UNION ACQUISITION GROUP, LLC

801-122357 JORDAN CHAPLIN

801-126071 PF ADVISORS, LLC
**Exhibit 23.01****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following registration statements on Form S-3of our report dated February 20, 2008 relating to the financial statements and financial statementschedules of Hartford Life Insurance Company (which report expresses an unqualified opinion andincludes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s change in its method of accounting andreporting for certain nontraditional long-duration contracts and for separate accounts in 2004),appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Insurance Company for the year endedDecember 31, 2007.       Form S-3 Registration Nos.      333-130089    333-133695    333-133693    333-133694    333-137215  DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 98 

To authorize the President to award the Medal of Honor to James Megellas, 

formerly of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, and currently of Colleyville, Texas, 

for acts of valor on January 28, 1945, during the Battle of the Bulge 

in World War II. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 10, 2019 

Mr. JOHNSON (for himself, Ms. BALDWIN, and Mr. CORNYN) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Armed Services 

A BILL 

To authorize the President to award the Medal of Honor 

to James Megellas, formerly of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, 

and currently of Colleyville, Texas, for acts of valor on 

January 28, 1945, during the Battle of the Bulge in 

World War II. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION FOR AWARD OF THE MEDAL 

4 OF HONOR TO JAMES MEGELLAS FOR ACTS 

5 OF VALOR DURING BATTLE OF THE BULGE. 

6 (a) WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.—Notwith7 standing the time limitations specified in section 3744 of 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 98 IS

1 title 10, United States Code, or any other time limitation 

2 with respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons 

3 who served in the Armed Forces, the President may award 

4 the Medal of Honor under section 3741 of such title to 

5 James Megellas, formerly of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, and 

6 currently of Colleyville, Texas, for the acts of valor during 

7 World War II described in subsection (b). 

8 (b) ACTS OF VALOR DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor 

9 referred to in subsection (a) are the actions of James 

10 Megellas on January 28, 1945, in Herresbach, Belgium, 

11 during the Battle of the Bulge when, as a first lieutenant 

12 in the 82nd Airborne Division, he led a surprise and dev13 astating attack on a much larger advancing enemy force, 

14 killing and capturing a large number and causing others 

15 to flee, single-handedly destroying an attacking German 

16 Mark V tank with two hand-held grenades, and then lead17 ing his men in clearing and seizing Herresbach. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 227 

Expressing support for health and wellness coaches. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 3, 2019 

Mr. HEINRICH submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for health and wellness coaches. 

Whereas the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention considers chronic diseases to be ‘‘the public health challenge 

of the 21st century’’; 

Whereas decades of research have linked lifestyle factors, 

such as inactivity, poor diet, tobacco smoking, and sustained stress, with increased risk for major illnesses and 

death; 

Whereas the costs associated with the treatment of many 

chronic diseases are high and often preventable; 

Whereas a health and wellness coach is a new type of 

healthcare worker who serves as a supportive mentor to 

motivate individuals to make positive health choices and 

move toward specific wellness goals; 


jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 227 IS 

Whereas health and wellness coaches support clients in 

achieving good health— 

(1) based on the goals of each client; and 

(2) in a manner consistent with the treatment plan 

recommended by a healthcare provider for the client; 

Whereas health and wellness coaches assist clients in making 

healthy lifestyle changes by encouraging them— 

(1) to use insight; 

(2) to use personal strengths and resources; 

(3) to set goals; 

(4) to create action steps; and 

(5) to hold themselves accountable; 

Whereas health and wellness coaches play a vital role in improving individual wellness that complements, and does 

not replace, the work of healthcare professionals; and 

Whereas an increasing number of studies demonstrate how 

health and wellness coaches help— 

(1) to improve individual health and wellness; and 

(2) to reduce healthcare costs: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate supports the efforts of the 

2 health and wellness coaches of the United States in their 

3 important work to improve the health and wellness of the 

4 people of the United States. 

Æ 


jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
### §430ff. Horseshoe Bend National Military Park; establishment

When not less than five hundred acres of the non-Federal lands hereinafter described (together with improvements thereon) and known as the Horseshoe Bend Battle Ground on the Tallapoosa River, in the State of Alabama, shall have been acquired and transferred free and clear of all encumbrances to the United States without expense to the Federal Government, such areas shall be, and are hereby, dedicated and set apart as a unit of the National Park System for the benefit and enjoyment of the people of the United States, under the name of the Horseshoe Bend National Military Park.

(July 25, 1956, ch. 729, §1, 70 Stat. 651.)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Nicholas PYEATT, Appellant.

No. 01-3841.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 3, 2002.

Filed May 10, 2002.

Before McMILLIAN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Nicholas Pyeatt appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court1 for the Western District of Missouri, revoking his supervised release and sentencing him to 30 months imprisonment. For reversal, Pyeatt argues that the sentence was an upward departure from the Chapter 7 Guidelines and that the district court might have imposed a shorter sentence if the court had realized that Pyeatt might fail to complete a Bureau of Prisons boot-camp program. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

As Pyeatt’s counsel acknowledges, the court was not bound to impose a sentence within Chapter 7’s recommended range. *See United States v. Carr,*66 F.3d 981, 983 (8th Cir.1995) (per curiam). Further, the district court specifically noted that Pyeatt would have to serve the full 30-month sentence in prison if he failed to complete boot camp.

Accordingly, we affirm. We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 21

- 00334

- CV

In re Chelsea Rebecca Cocchia

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a)

.

__________________________________________ Chari L. Kelly, Just ice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly

Filed: August 27, 2021
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2711

RAMONA S. BURNETTE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CACI, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-98-506-3) Submitted: March 25, 1999 Decided: March 30, 1999 Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ramona S. Burnette, Appellant Pro Se. Adam Augustine Carter, AlanDavid Strasser, Robert L. Magielnicki, Sr., KUTAK, ROCK, Washington, D.C.; Allen Scott Rugg, POWELL, GOLDSTEIN, FRAZER & MURPHY, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on October 29, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on October 30, 1998. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray , 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: Ramona Burnette appeals the district court’s order dismissing as barred by the statute of limitations her complaint in which she alleged bankruptcy discrimination. We have reviewed the record andthe district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Burnette v. Caci, Inc. , No. CA-98-506-3 (E.D. Va. Oct. 30, 1998). * Additionally, we deny Caci’s motion for sanctions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### SUBCHAPTER I—DEFINITIONS
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Equality Investments,  Inc.,
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the  undersigned,
Daniel L. Hodges,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal  Accounting  Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2005


/s/ Daniel L. Hodges
Daniel L. Hodges
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §§3839 to 3839d. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–79, title II, §2711, Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 771

Section 3839, Pub. L. 99–198, title XII, §1239, as added Pub. L. 101–624, title XIV, §1440, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3597; amended Pub. L. 102–237, title II, §204(7), Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1855, related to establishment of environmental easement program by Secretary.

Section 3839a, Pub. L. 99–198, title XII, §1239A, as added Pub. L. 101–624, title XIV, §1440, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3597, related to duties of owners; components of plan.

Section 3839b, Pub. L. 99–198, title XII, §1239B, as added Pub. L. 101–624, title XIV, §1440, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3598, related to duties of Secretary.

Section 3839c, Pub. L. 99–198, title XII, §1239C, as added Pub. L. 101–624, title XIV, §1440, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3599, related to payments.

Section 3839d, Pub. L. 99–198, title XII, §1239D, as added Pub. L. 101–624, title XIV, §1440, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3600, related to changes in ownership; modification of easement.
§ 345.74 Awards for special achievements for inmate workers. While recognition of inmate worker special achievements may originate from any FPI staff member, the achievement ordinarily will be submitted in writing by the inmate's immediate supervisor. ( a ) The SOI shall appoint a local institution committee to consider inmates for special achievement awards.
( b ) The committee shall forward its recommendations to the SOI, who is authorized to approve individual awards (cash or gifts) not to exceed $100 in value. A recommendation for an award in excess of $100 (cash or gifts) shall be forwarded, with the Superintendent's recommendation and the justification for it, through the Warden to the Assistant Director. The Warden may submit comments on the recommendation.
Historical RFG MTBE Usage (Received on 3/9/06 from Tancred Lidderdale at EIA)

MTBE Balance (thousand barrels per day)

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Oct-05

Supply:

 Domestic Production 163 185 198 205 216 211 212 201 168 130 132

 Gross Imports

 Gros Exports

 Net Imports 39 39 48 42 54 53 55 35 22 8 -3

 RFG Net Imports 114 172 161 176 190 196 212 228 247 210 236

 Contained MTBE @10% 11 17 16 18 19 20 21 23 25 21 24

 Opening Stocks (thousand bbls) 13.769 8.702 10.008 8.229 9.653 8.094 7.256 7.653 5.054 5.107 4.325

 Closing Stocks (thousand bbls) 8.702 10.008 8.229 9.653 8.094 7.256 7.653 5.054 5.107 4.325 3.204

 Stock Change 14 -4 5 -4 4 2 -1 7 0 2 4

 Total Supply 227 238 267 261 293 286 287 266 215 161 156

Demand:

 MTBE in RFG 214 220 246 263 259 257 239 224 172 130

 Unnacounted for (e.g., octane) 13 17 21 -2 34 29 49 42 42 31

MTBE in RFG by State

 Massachusetts 16 16 17 16 15 16 17 18 19 20

 Connecticutt 11 9 10 10 9 9 9 10 9 2

 Maine 4 4 4 4 1 0 0 0 0 0

 New Hampshire 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 4 4

 Rhode Island 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

 New England 36 35 36 36 30 31 32 34 35 29

 New York 23 22 24 24 21 20 21 22 20 8

 New Jersey 31 29 31 33 28 26 27 27 26 17

 Pennsylvania 9 9 9 9 9 9 10 10 9 9

 Middle Atlantic 63 60 64 67 58 55 58 58 56 35

 Delaware 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

 Maryland 13 10 11 11 11 12 13 14 14 15

 District of Columbia 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

 Virginia 14 11 12 13 13 14 13 14 14 15

 South Atlantic 31 25 27 28 28 29 30 31 32 34

 Illinois 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

 Indiana 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

 Kentucky 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0

 Missouri 0 0 0 0 2 3 3 1 0 0

 Wisconsin 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

 PADD 2 6 3 4 3 5 5 5 3 0 0

 Texas 26 24 27 29 31 30 30 32 33 32

 Arizona 0 0 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 0

 California 52 74 86 97 104 102 80 61 12 0

 PADD 5 52 74 88 101 107 106 83 65 16 0

 Total US 214 220 246 263 259 257 239 224 172 130
### §418. Repealed. Feb. 20, 1931, ch. 235, 46 Stat. 1191

Section, act Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 418, 43 Stat. 1104, was in opinion of Judge Advocate General repealed by act Feb. 20, 1931, providing that no real estate of the Department of the Army should be disposed of without authority of Congress and providing "all existing acts or parts thereof in conflict with this proviso, other than special acts for the sale of stated tracts of land, are hereby repealed." See J.A.G. 611, Dec. 3, 1931.
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

Washington, D.C. 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 93039 / September 16, 2021

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension of trading 

in the securities of the following issuer, commencing at 9:30 a.m. EDT on September 17, 2021 

and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EDT on September 30, 2021:

 Ngen Technologies Holdings Corp. (NGRP)

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of the foregoing company due 

to a lack of current and accurate information about the company because it has not filed certain 

periodic reports with the Commission. This order was entered pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act).

The Commission cautions brokers, dealers, shareholders and prospective purchasers that they 

should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available 

information and any information subsequently issued by this company.

Brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11, at 

the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered relating to the securities 

of the subject company unless and until the broker or dealer has strictly complied with all of the 

provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is required by the rule, it 

should refrain from entering quotations relating to the securities of this company that has been 

subject to a trading suspension until such time as it has familiarized itself with the rule and is 

certain that all of its provisions have been met. Any broker or dealer with questions regarding

the rule should contact the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, DC 

at (202) 551-5777. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation which is in violation of the rule,

the Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement action. 

If any broker, dealer or other person has any information which may relate to this matter, they 

should immediately communicate it to the Delinquent Filings Branch of the Division of 

Enforcement at (202) 551-5466, or by e-mail at DelinquentFilings@sec.gov.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 133821 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 133821 

 COA: 266619 
 Cass CC: 05-010031-FC;

DERRICK LAWAYNE DEALS, 05-010057-FC 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 20, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d1022 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 29, 2007 

 Clerk