alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF BEEMER, PRICHER, KUEHNHACKL & HEIDBRINK, P.A.
            --------------------------------------------------------
               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into the Form S-8
Registration Statement No.333-07449 regarding the Dividend Reinvestment Program
and Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-64537 regarding the Stock
Compensation Plan of Whitemark Homes, Inc. of our report dated February 12, 2004
which is included in the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Whitemark Homes, Inc.
and Subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2003.


/s/ BEEMER, PRICHER, KUEHNHACKL & HEIDBRINK, P.A.
Beemer, Pricher, Kuehnhackl & Heidbrink, P.A.


Winter Park, Florida
Date: November 15, 2004
#### § 802.21 Appeals.

You may appeal a denial of a request for an accounting to the Office of the General Counsel in the same manner as a denial of a request for access to records (See § 802.16) and the same procedures will be followed.
|Exhibit 32.2
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PremierWest Bancorp (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Tom Anderson, the Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                       
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period certified.
|  

This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any of the Companys filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise be deemed to be filed as part of the Report or under such Acts.

|Date: October 31, 2007 |  | /s/ TOM ANDERSON                                
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|                       |  | Tom Anderson                                    
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
|                       |  | Officer                                         

---
#### § 1215.1 Scope.

This part establishes criteria, in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 153, as amended, and Section 355 of the National Highway System Designation Act of 1995, for determining compliance with the requirement that States not having safety belt use laws be subject to a transfer of Federal-aid highway apportionments under 23 U.S.C. 104 (b)(1), (b)(2), and (b)(3) to the highway safety program apportionment under 23 U.S.C. 402.

[61 FR 28749, June 6, 1996]
umubo o bumahing

sa itaas ng iyong

manggas, hindi sa

iyong mga kamay.

Takpan ng tisyu

ang iyong bibig

at ilong kapag

umuubo o

bumabahing

Ilagay sa tapunan ng basura

ang iyong ginamit na tisyu.

o kaya

pagkatapos umubo o bumahing. 

Itigil ang pagkalat ng mga mikrobyo na nagdudulot ng sakit sa iyo at sa ibang mga tao!

linisin ng dealkohol na panlinis ng kamay. 

Hugasan ang mga

kamay ng sabon at

mainit-init na tubig

o kaya

Minnesota Department of Health

717 SE Delaware Street

Minneapolis, MN 55414

612-676-5414 or 1-877-676-5414

www.health.state.mn.us

Minnesota

Antibiotic 

Resistance 

Collaborative

Takpan

Uboang iyong

Linisin

Kamay ang iyong mga
### §424a–1. Acceptance of donations of lands and other property on Signal Mountain

The Secretary of the Interior, in his discretion, is authorized to accept, on behalf of the United States, donations of lands, buildings, structures, and other property, or interests therein, on Signal Mountain near Chattanooga, Tennessee, for addition to the Chickamauga-Chattanooga National Military Park, the title to such property or interests to be satisfactory to him. Upon acquisition, such lands shall be a part of the Chickamauga-Chattanooga National Military Park and shall be subject to all laws and regulations applicable thereto.

(Mar. 5, 1942, ch. 148, §1, 56 Stat. 133.)
CONCURRING OPINION

No. 04-12-00116-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.C., a Child

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-PA-01561

Honorable Solomon Casseb, III, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Karen Angelini, Justice

Concurring Opinion by: Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 31, 2012

I agree with the reasoning expressed by Justice Angelini in her opinion and concur in the 

judgment. I also agree with the concerns expressed by Justice Speedlin in her concurring 

opinion. I write separately to express my concern about the result reached in this case.

Justice Angelini correctly sets forth the standard by which we are to interpret statutes. 

Based on a plain reading of the relevant statutes, the paternal grandparents were required to 

establish standing by demonstrating they had substantial past contact with J.C. See TEX. FAM.

CODE ANN. § 102.005(5) (West Supp. 2012). The record contains evidence that the grandparents 

sought to have contact with J.C. while J.C. was in the hospital and before the parental rights were 

terminated, but the Department failed to provide any information about J.C. or her location to the 

paternal grandparents. The grandfather testified that the Department “didn’t want to give us 

visits. We had to go back to court until they decided to give us visits.” He also testified that he

and the grandmother would have visited J.C. more often, but the Department did not allow it. 

The grandmother testified that she wanted to visit J.C., but the Department kept her away despite 

her repeated requests.
Concurring Opinion 04-12-00116-CV

- 2 -

I am troubled because it appears a government agency prevented the paternal 

grandparents from having the opportunity to establish standing by denying them the opportunity 

to have substantial past contact. As Justice Speedlin asserts in her concurrence, under certain 

circumstances, “a fundamental liberty interest in the parent-child relationship” extends to 

grandparents. Concurring Opinion, at *3. While the exact parameters of this interest have not 

been established, it seems fundamentally unfair to deny standing to a grandparent when 

government action prevented the actions or activity necessary to establish the right to be 

considered for adoption.

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice
### §410tt–5. Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 102–247, title I, §107, Feb. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 37.)
#### Edward Riedman, as Executor, etc., Appellant, v. William M. Bates, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
Exhibit 32.2





CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Gyrodyne Company of America, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Gary Fitlin, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.






Date: March 30, 2010By:
/s/ Gary FitlinGary Fitlin,Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 285 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 285

       Designating September 2019 as ``School Bus Safety Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 25, 2019

Mrs. Fischer (for herself, Ms. Duckworth, and Ms. Warren) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

                             July 31, 2019

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Designating September 2019 as ``School Bus Safety Month''.

Whereas, every school day in the United States, approximately 500,000 public and 
        private school buses carry more than 26,000,000 children to and from 
        school;
Whereas school buses comprise the largest mass transportation fleet in the 
        United States;
Whereas 48 percent of all K-12 students ride a school bus for each of the 180 
        school days in a year, totaling nearly 4,680,000,000 miles driven in 
        school buses annually;
Whereas the Child Safety Network, celebrating 30 years of national public 
        service, supports the CSN Safe Bus campaign, which is designed to 
        provide the latest training, technology, and free safety and security 
        resources to the school bus industry;
Whereas the designation of School Bus Safety Month will allow broadcast and 
        digital media and social networking industries to make commitments to 
        disseminate public service announcements that are produced in order--

    (1) to provide free resources designed to safeguard children;

    (2) to recognize school bus drivers and professionals; and

    (3) to encourage the driving public to engage in safer driving behavior 
near school buses when students are boarding and disembarking from the 
school buses;

Whereas key leaders who are deserving of recognition during School Bus Safety 
        Month and beyond have provided security awareness training materials to 
        more than 14,000 public and private school districts, trained more than 
        100,000 school bus operators, and provided more than 150,000 
        counterterrorism guides to individuals who are key to providing both 
        safety and security for children in the United States; and
Whereas School Bus Safety Month offers the Senate and the people of the United 
        States an opportunity to recognize and thank all of the school bus 
        drivers in the United States and the professionals who are focused on 
        school bus safety and security: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate designates September 2019 as ``School Bus 
Safety Month''.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Acquiring Title by the City of New York to Certain Land, etc., Situated in the Block Bounded by Chauncey and Marion Streets, Hopkinson and Rockaway Avenues, in the Borough of Brooklyn, etc.

Order confirming referee’s report settled and filed. Present — Burr, Thomas, Garr, Rich and Stapleton, JJ.
#### § 42.714 Special benefits.

If a recipient operating a program or activity provides special benefits to the elderly or to children, such use of age distinctions shall be presumed to be necessary to the normal operation of the program or activity, notwithstanding the provisions of § 42.712.
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3491 — BAE SYSTEMS/ALVIS)

(2004/C 236/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 10 August 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
#### § 500.202 TMS definitions.

Unless otherwise specified in this part, the definitions in 23 U.S.C. 101(a) and § 500.103 are applicable to this subpart. As used in this part:

*Highway traffic data* means data used to develop estimates of the amount of person or vehicular travel, vehicle usage, or vehicle characteristics associated with a system of highways or with a particular location on a highway. These types of data support the estimation of the number of vehicles traversing a section of highway or system of highways during a prescribed time period (traffic volume), the portion of such vehicles that may be of a particular type (vehicle classification), the weights of such vehicles including the weight of each axle and associated distances between axles on a vehicle (vehicle weight), or the average number of persons being transported in a vehicle (vehicle occupancy).

*Traffic monitoring system* means a systematic process for the collection, analysis, summary, and retention of highway and transit related person and vehicular traffic data.

*Transit traffic data* means person and vehicular data for public transportation on public highways and streets and the number of vehicles and ridership for dedicated transit rights-of-way (e.g., rail and busways), at the maximum load points for the peak period in the peak direction and for the daily time period.
### §1614. Severability

If any provision of this subchapter or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of this subchapter and of the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

(Pub. L. 93–378, §16, as added Pub. L. 94–588, §11, Oct. 22, 1976, 90 Stat. 2958.)
### §469c. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 86–523, §7, formerly §4, June 27, 1960, 74 Stat. 221, renumbered and amended Pub. L. 93–291, §1(9), May 24, 1974, 88 Stat. 175; Pub. L. 95–625, title VI, §603, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3518, related to assistance to Secretary by Federal agencies responsible for construction projects. See section 312507 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
#### Frances S. Mosher, Respondent, v. Maurice E. Mosher, Appellant.

No opinion. Carswell, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2635

VIRGINIA MCDONALD, Petitioner, versus DANTE COAL COMPANY (Badger Coal Company);DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (95-2029-BLA) Submitted: August 18, 1998 Decided: January 26, 1999 Before WIDENER and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.George Daniel Blizzard, II, SHAFFER & SHAFFER, Madison, West Virginia, for Petitioner. William Steele Mattingly, JACKSON & KELLY, Morgantown, West Virginia; Patricia May Nece, J. Matthew McCracken, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Virginia McDonald seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1997). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. McDonald v. Dante Coal Company , BRB No. 95-2029-BLA (B.R.B. Sept. 26, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 21

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                              NAME UNDER WHICH
SUBSIDIARY NAME                                               BUSINESS IS CONDUCTED
---------------                                               ---------------------
<S>                                                           <C>

Consolidated Asset Management                                 Consolidated Asset Management
Company, Inc.                                                 Company, Inc.

Harmon Railway Systems                                        Harmon Railway Systems
International Corporation                                     International Corporation

Vaughan Harmon Systems, Ltd.                                  Vaughan Harmon Systems, Ltd.

Vale Harmon Enterprises, Ltd.                                 Vale Harmon Enterprises, Ltd.

Harmon Industries Australia Pty. Ltd.                         Harmon Industries Australia Pty. Ltd.

Industrias Harmon de Mexico, SA de CV                         Industrias Harmon de Mexico, SA de CV

CSS, Inc.                                                     CSS, Inc.

SES CO, Inc.                                                  SES CO, Inc.

Seaboard Systems Co., Inc.                                    Seaboard Systems Co., Inc.

DJR, Inc.                                                     DJR, Inc.

Golden Gate Switchgear, Inc.                                  Golden Gate Switchgear, Inc.

Harmon Control and Information Systems, Inc.                  Harmon Control and Information Systems, Inc.

Siliani Harmon S.p.A.                                         Siliani Harmon S.p.A.

Siliani Elettronica ed Impianti S.p.A.                        Siliani Elettronica ed Impianti S.p.A.

Centro Servizi S.r.L.                                         Centro Servizi S.r.L.
</TABLE>
§ 91.54 Applicability. ( a ) *Major Federal action.* NEPA's requirements apply to any proposal for legislation or other major federal action that might significantly impact the quality of the human environment. The CEQ regulations in 40 CFR 1508.18 define “major federal actions” as actions with effects that may be major and which are potentially subject to Federal control and responsibility. The CEQ regulations categorize “major federal actions” as, among other things, the “[a]pproval of specific projects, such as construction or management activities located in a defined geographic area. Projects include actions approved by permit or other regulatory decision as well as Federal and Federally assisted activities.” (40 CFR 1508.18(b)(4)).
( b ) *VOI/TIS construction grants subject to NEPA.* This subpart applies to all proposed, new and partially completed VOI/TIS projects (including projects on tribal lands) initiated by state or local units of government with grant funding from OJP that involve construction, expansion, renovation, facility planning, site selection, site preparation, security or facility upgrades or other activities that may significantly impact the environment.
( c ) *Projects.* Although VOI/TIS money cannot be used for a project's operations expenses, the definition of “project” or “proposal” for NEPA review purposes is defined as both the construction and the long-term operation of correctional facilities and related components such as all off-site projects to accommodate the needs of the correctional facilities project (e.g., road and utility construction or expansion, projects offered to the affected community as an incentive to accept the correctional facility construction or expansion, and other reasonably foreseeable future actions regardless of what agency or third party undertakes such action). Reasonably foreseeable actions include future prison construction phases, especially when either current acreage requirements or design capacities for utilities are based on needs stemming from future phases.
#### § 65.20 General.

The purpose of the Act is to assist state and/or local units of government which are experiencing law enforcement emergencies to respond to those emergencies through the provision of Federal law enforcement assistance. The authority and responsibility for implementation of this section is vested in the Attorney General of the United States.
### Bibliography

King, C. J. (1980). Separation processes. New York: McGraw - Hill. ISBN: 9780070346123 Hines, A. L., & Maddox, R. N. (1985). Mass transfer: Fundamentals and applications. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice - Hall. ISBN: 9780135596098 Toole - O'Neil, B., & Ohio. (1998). Dr y scrubbing technologies for flue gas desulfurization. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. ISBN: 9780792383468 Kitto, J. B., Stultz, S. C., & Babcock & Wi lcox Company. (2005). Steam, its generation and use. Barberton, O H: Babcock & W ilcox. ISBN: 9780963457011 Wa ng, L. K., Pereira, N. C., & Hung, Y. - T. (2010). Air pollution control engineering. Totowa, N.J: Humana Press. 9781617373978 Stoft, S. (2002). Power economics: Designing markets for electricity. Chichester: W il ey- Academ y. ISBN: 9780471150404 Vatavuk, W. M. (1990). Estimating costs of air pollution control. Chelsea, Mich: Lewis Publishers. ISBN: 9780873711425 McKenna, J. D. (2008). Fine particle (2.5 microns) emissions: Regulations, measurement, and control. Oxford: Wi ley - Blackwell. ISBN: 9780471709633
#### § 36.306 Personal devices and services.

This part does not require a public accommodation to provide its customers, clients, or participants with personal devices, such as wheelchairs; individually prescribed devices, such as prescription eyeglasses or hearing aids; or services of a personal nature including assistance in eating, toileting, or dressing.
(No. 82-CC-0792

#### Joseph R. Connolly, Claimant, *v.*The State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed January 3, 1983.*

Scanlan and Hartigan, Ltd., for Claimant.

Tyrone C. Fahner, Attorney General (Paul M. Sengpiehl, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.

Poch, J.

This matter comes before the Court upon the joint stipulation of Claimant and Respondent to the granting of a settlement in the amount of $2,500.00 without a finding of State liability. The Court being otherwise duly advised in the premises, therefore,

It is hereby ordered that a settlement amount be entered in favor of Claimant, Joseph R. Connolly, in the amount of $2,500.00 (twenty five hundred dollars) in full and final satisfaction of this matter.