alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 57 (Thursday, March 24, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 16634]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6517]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

[FWS-R1-ES-2011-NXXX; 10120-1113-0000-F5]


Endangered Wildlife; Receipt of Application for Enhancement of 
Survival Permit

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability of a permit application; request for 
comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirements of the Endangered Species 
Act of 1973, as amended (Act), we, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 
(Service), invite the public to comment on an application for a permit 
to conduct enhancement of survival activities with an endangered 
species.

DATES: To ensure consideration, please send your written comments by 
April 25, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Endangered Species Program Manager, Ecological Services, 
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 911 NE. 11th Avenue, Portland, OR 
97232-4181.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda Belluomini, Fish and Wildlife 
Biologist, at the above address or by telephone (503-231-6131) or fax 
(503-231-6243).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following applicant has applied for a 
recovery permit to conduct certain activities with endangered species 
under section 10(a)(1)(A) of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). We are 
soliciting review of and comments on this application by local, State, 
and Federal agencies and the public.

Permit No. TE-36737A

    Applicant: Randi A. Rhodes, Honolulu, Hawaii.
    The applicant requests a permit to take (capture, band, attach 
radio transmitters and neck collars, color mark with dye, collect 
blood, and measure) the Hawaiian coot (Fulica alai) in conjunction with 
monitoring and population biology and life history studies in the State 
of Hawaii, for the purpose of enhancing its survival.

Public Comments

    We are soliciting public review and comment on this recovery permit 
application. Submit written comments to the Endangered Species Program 
Manager (see address above). Before including your address, phone 
number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in 
your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment--including 
your personal identifying information--may be made publicly available 
at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your 
personal identifying information from public review, we cannot 
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
    Please refer to the permit number for the application when 
submitting comments. All comments and materials we receive in response 
to this request will be available for public inspection, by 
appointment, during normal business hours at the above address.

    Dated: March 14, 2011.
Theresa E. Rabot,
Acting Regional Director, Region 1, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-6517 Filed 3-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
                        1997 DIRECTOR'S STOCK OPTION PLAN

      WHEREAS, Safety-Kleen Corp. (the "Company") has previously established the
Director's Stock Option Plan effective July 9, 1997 (the "Plan") for the benefit
of the non-employee directors of the Company.

      WHEREAS,  the Plan is intended to advance the interests of the Company and
its subsidiaries by encouraging stock ownership by directors of the Company;

      WHEREAS,  the Plan was  approved by the Board of  Directors of the Company
(the  "Board")  on July 9,  1997 and was  approved  by the  shareholders  of the
Company on November 25, 1997;

      WHEREAS,  the Plan  authorized the Board to grant options for the purchase
of not more than 135,000 shares of Company  common stock (the "Shares")  (taking
into account the one for four reverse stock split) in the aggregate;

      WHEREAS,  the Board has  granted to  non-employee  directors  options to
purchase 135,000 Shares to date; and

      WHEREAS,  the  Board by  unanimous  resolution  at its  regular  quarterly
meeting on October 5, 1999  approved an  amendment  to the Plan  increasing  the
number of Shares which may be issued under the Plan by an additional 300,000.

      NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as set forth below.

I.    SHARES SUBJECT TO THE PLAN

      Section 3 of the Plan shall be amended and restated to read as follows:

      SHARES SUBJECT TO THE PLAN

      The Board of Directors may grant options  ("Options")  for the purchase of
not more than 435,000  Common Shares  ("Shares")  $1.00 par value of LESI in the
aggregate  subject to  adjustments  as  provided in  paragraph 4 hereof.  If any
Option  granted  to a person  eligible  to be  granted  Options  under  the Plan
("Participant")  lapses or is  otherwise  terminated,  such Shares shall then be
again available for the grant of Options hereunder.

II.   EFFECTIVE DATE OF FIRST AMENDMENT

      This First Amendment to the Plan shall be effective and shall be deemed to
have been adopted on October 5, 1999.

III.  CONTINUING EFFECTS

      Except as  expressly  amended  hereby,  the Plan shall  continue to be and
shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.
#### John C. Schenck, Respondent, v. United States Health and Accident Insurance Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted in Corning City Court, with costs to appellant to abide event. Hew trial to be had on the sixteenth day of June, at ten A. M. Held, 1. That there was a breach of warranty respecting the plaintiff’s having been treated by a physician within the terms of the application. 2. That the finding of the jury that the injury was due to an accident to the car is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. All concurred.
Exhibit 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

     We, the undersigned directors of Green Mountain Power 
Corporation, hereby severally constitute Douglas G. Hyde, 
Christopher L. Dutton and Peter H. Zamore, and each of them 
singly, our true and lawful attorney with full power of 
substitution, to sign for us and in our names in the capacities 
indicated below, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Green Mountain 
Power Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996, and 
generally to do all such things in our name and behalf in our 
capacities as directors to enable Green Mountain Power Corporation 
to comply with the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934, as amended, all requirements of the Securities and Exchange 
Commission, and all requirements of any other applicable law or 
regulation, hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures as they 
may be signed by our said attorney, to said Annual Report.

SIGNATURE                     TITLE                   DATE

_/s/ Douglas G. Hyde   ___  President and Director    February 10, 1997
Douglas G. Hyde           (Principal Executive
                          Officer)

_/s/ Thomas P. Salmon______
Thomas P. Salmon          Chairman of the Board       February 10, 1997

_/s/ Robert E. Boardman____
Robert E. Boardman        Director                    February 10, 1997

_/s/ Nordahl L. Brue_______
Nordahl L. Brue           Director                    February 10, 1997

_/s/ William H. Bruett_____
William H. Bruett         Director                    February 10, 1997

___________________________
Merrill O. Burns          Director                    

_/s/ Lorraine E. Chickering
Lorraine E. Chickering    Director                    February 10, 1997

_/s/ John V. Cleary________
John V. Cleary            Director                    February 10, 1997

_/s/ Richard I. Fricke_____
Richard I. Fricke         Director                    February 10, 1997

_/s/ Euclid A. Irving______
Euclid A. Irving          Director                    February 10, 1997

_/s/ Martin L. Johnson_____
Martin L. Johnson         Director                    February 10, 1997

_/s/ Ruth W. Page__________
Ruth W. Page              Director                    February 10, 1997
§ 8.5 Custody. ( a ) All property seized for forfeiture by ATF, DEA, or FBI shall be delivered to the custody of the U.S. Marshals Service (USMS), or a custodian approved by the USMS, as soon as practicable after seizure, unless it is retained as evidence by the seizing agency.
( b ) Seized U.S. currency (and, to the extent practicable, seized foreign currency and negotiable instruments) must be deposited promptly in the Seized Asset Deposit Fund pending forfeiture. Provisional exceptions to this requirement may be granted as follows: ( 1 ) If the seized currency has a value less than $5,000 and a supervisory official within a U.S. Attorney's Office determines in writing that the currency is reasonably likely to serve a significant, independent, tangible evidentiary purpose, or that retention is necessary while the potential evidentiary significance of the currency is being determined by scientific testing or otherwise; or
( 2 ) If the seized currency has a value greater than $5,000 and the Chief of the Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section (AFMLS), Criminal Division, determines in writing that the currency is reasonably likely to serve a significant, independent, tangible evidentiary purpose, or that retention is necessary while the potential evidentiary significance of the currency is being determined by scientific testing or otherwise.
( c ) Seized currency has a *significant independent, tangible evidentiary purpose* as those terms are used in § 8.5(b)(1) and (b)(2) if, for example, it bears fingerprint evidence, is packaged in an incriminating fashion, or contains a traceable amount of narcotic residue or some other substance of evidentiary significance. If only a portion of the seized currency has evidentiary value, only that portion should be retained; the balance should be deposited.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TERREL NOAKS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 370 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 27th day of December, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED

.
### §4912. Fees and access

The Secretary shall provide reasonable public services and access (including electronic access) to any information maintained as part of the Data Bank and may charge reasonable fees consistent with section 552 of title 5.

(Pub. L. 100–418, title V, §5412, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1467.)
### §410fff–4. Expansion of the Black Canyon of the Gunnison Wilderness

#### (a) Expansion of Black Canyon of the Gunnison Wilderness

The Black Canyon of the Gunnison Wilderness, as established by subsection (b) of the first section of Public Law 94–567 (90 Stat. 2692), is expanded to include the parcel of land depicted on the Map as "Tract A" and consisting of approximately 4,419 acres.

#### (b) Administration

The Black Canyon of the Gunnison Wilderness shall be administered as a component of the Park.

(Pub. L. 106–76, §6, Oct. 21, 1999, 113 Stat. 1129.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Subsection (b) of the first section of Public Law 94–567, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 94–567, §1(b), Oct. 20, 1976, 90 Stat. 2692, which enacted provisions listed in a table of Wilderness Areas set out under section 1132 of this title.
1 NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

No. 124,104

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

S TATE OF K ANSAS , Appellee ,

V

.
J OSE A NGEL R IVERA

- C RUZ , Appellant

.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appeal from Sedgwick District Court; S ETH L. R UNDLE , judge. Opinion filed Apr il 15 , 20 22

. Appeal d ismissed.

Michelle A. Davis , of Kansas Appellate Defender Office, for appellant

.

Lance J. Gillett , assistant district attorney, Marc Bennett , district attorney, and Derek Schmidt , attorney general, for appellee

.

Before M ALONE , P.J., S CHROEDER and H URST , J J.

P ER C URIAM : At the time of Jose A ngel Rivera

- Cruz ' sentencing for one count of criminal possession of a weapon , the district court determined he was entitled to jail
credit for the time he had served , which resulted in his entire prison sentence being
satisfied. The district then imposed postrelease supervision of 12 months as required by K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 22

- 3717(d )(1) (C) . Rivera

- Cr u z now appeals the imposition of his postrelease sentence

. Specifically, h e argues the district court erred in ordering him to serve a term of postrelease supervision because he was never placed in the custody of the Kansas Department of Corrections.2 After Rivera

- Cruz' brief was filed, the State filed a notice of change in custodial status in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 2.042 (2022 Kan. S. Ct. R. at 18 ), indicating Rivera

- Cruz satisfied the term of his postrelease supervision on December 25, 2021. The State's notice included appropriate documentation reflecti ng Rivera

- Cruz was no longer on postrelease supervision.

We issued an order to the parties to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed as moot in light of Rivera

- Cruz' completion of his postrelease supervision. In our order, we advised that Rivera

- Cruz ' failure to respond by March 14, 2022, could
result in dismissal of the appeal. Rivera

- Cruz did not respond. The State responded, asserting the appeal should be dismissed as moot. We agree with the State.

As a general rule, appellate courts do not decide moot questions. An appellate

court can dismiss an appeal as moot if it can be "' clearly and convincingly shown the actual controversy has ended, the only judgment that could be entered would be ineffectual for any purpose, and [ the judgment ] would not impact any of the parties' rights. ' [Citat ion omitted.]" State v. Roat , 311 Kan. 581, 584, 466 P.3d 439 (2020)

.

We observe nothing showing an ongoing case or controversy, and no ruling from

us can affect Rivera

- Cruz' rights as the full term of postrelease supervision h as been served. Accordingly, any judgment we could enter would be ineffectual for any purpose.
W e dismiss Rivera

- Cruz ' appeal as moot.

Appeal d ismissed.
Cite as 2013 Ark. App. 500 

1 

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION III

No. CR-12-900

PAMELA HOOKS

APPELLANT

V.

STATE OF ARKANSAS

APPELLEE

Opinion Delivered September 18, 2013

APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI

COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, FIRST 

DIVISION

[NO. CR-2010-4212]

HONORABLE LEON JOHNSON, 

JUDGE

REBRIEFING ORDERED

BRANDON J. HARRISON, Judge

 A Pulaski County jury found Pamela Hooks guilty of second-degree murder. Ark. 

Code Ann. § 5-10-103 (Repl. 2006). She was then sentenced to 720 months’ 

imprisonment. Hooks argues on appeal that the circuit court erred in denying her motion 

for a directed verdict because the State failed to sufficiently prove its case against her. We 

cannot decide the merits of Hooks’s appeal at this point because she has failed to abstract 

material parts of the trial testimony. 

 Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2(a)(5) (2013) provides: 

(5) Abstract. The appellant shall create an abstract of the material parts of all 

the transcripts (stenographically reported material) in the record. 

Information in a transcript is material if the information is essential for the 

appellate court to confirm its jurisdiction, to understand the case, and to 

decide the issues on appeal. 
Cite as 2013 Ark. App. 500 

2

In her brief, Hooks challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support her conviction 

(on the element that she intended John Davis’s death), but her abstract omits her own trial 

testimony. Hooks’s trial testimony is essential to understand the issues and decide this 

case’s merits. Spears v. State, 82 Ark. App. 376, 109 S.W.3d 139 (2003). We therefore 

direct Hooks to correct this deficiency by filing a substituted brief within fifteen days of

this order’s date. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3) (2013). After service of her substituted brief, 

the State may file a responsive brief in the time prescribed by the supreme court clerk, or 

it may choose to rely on the appellee’s brief it previously filed. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3). 

We encourage Hooks’s counsel to review our rules and her current abstract and 

addendum to ensure that no additional deficiencies are present. 

Rebriefing ordered. 

BROWN and WHITEAKER, JJ., agree. 

James Phillips and Elizabeth Borders, Deputy Public Defenders, by: Clint Miller, 

Deputy Public Defender, for appellant. 

Dustin McDaniel, Att’y Gen., by: Vada Berger, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.
| Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc                  |                       |
|-------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|
| Melissa Downs, Investor Relations Manager  | Phone +1 (914) 789-2801    |
|                                            | Email mdowns@progenics.com |

----
CS 315822-V 06/25/2020

រ�ឿង 10 យងដែលអ្នកអាច ៉ាធ្វ

ើ

បានដើម្បីគ្របគ្រង ់

រោគសញ្ញាកូវីដ-19 របស

់

អ្នកនៅផ្ទះ

កំណែដែលអាចរកបាន៖ https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/if-you-are-sick/steps-when-sick.html

ប្រសិនបើអ្នកអាចមាន ឬអាចបញ្ជា ក់បានថាមានកូវីដ-19៖

1. នៅផ្ទះ ពីការងារនិងសាលារ ៀន។ ហ�ើ

យនៅឱ្យឆ្ងា យពីកន្លែងសាធារណៈផ្សេងៗ

ទ�ៀត។ ប្រសិនបើអ្នកត្រូវចេញទៅក្រៅ

សូមចៀសវាងការប្រប្រាើ ស់មធ្យោបាយ

ធ្វើដណំ ើ រសាធារណៈការជះរួមគ្ ិ នា

ឬតាក់ស៊ី។

2. តាមដានរោគសញ្ញារបស់អ្នកដោយ

ប្រុងប្រយ័ត្ន។ ប្រសិនបើរោគស

ញ្ញា របស់អ្នកកាន់តែធ្ងន់ធ្ងរ សូម

ទូរស័ព្ទទៅអ្នកផ្តល់សេវាថែទាំ

សខភាពរ ុ បស់អ្នកជាបន្ទាន់។

3. សម្រាកនិងរក្សាជាតិទឹក។

4. ប្រសិនបើអ្នកមានការណាត់

ជួបព្យាបាល សូមទូរស័ព្ទ

ទៅអ្នកផ្តលសេ់ វាថែទាសុខ ំ

ភាព ជាមនុ និងប្រាប់ពួកគេថា

អ្នកមានឬអាចមានកូវដី -19។

5. សម្រាប់ភាពអាសន្នផ្កនែ វេជ្ជសាស្ត្រ

សូមទូរស័ព្ទទៅលេខ 911 និង

ជូនដំណឹងដលបុ ់ គ្គលិកបញ្ជូន

ដែលអ្នកមានឬអាចមានកូវដី -19។

6. ប្រើក្រដាសជូនគ្របមុខនៅពេ

លក្អកនិងកណ្តា ស់ឬប្រកែើ ងដៃ

ផ្កខាងក នែ ្នុងរបស់អ្នក។

7. លាងដៃឱ្យបានញឹកញាបជាមួយ ់

សាប៊ូនិងទឹកយ៉ា ងហោចណាស់ 20 វនាទ ិ ី

ឬសម្អា តដៃរបស់អ្នកជាមួយទឹកលាង

ដៃដែលមានជាតិអាល់កលយ៉ា ងតិច ុ

60%។

8. នៅបន្ទបណា់ មួយ និងនៅឆ្ងា យពីមនុ

ស្សផ្សេងៗទៀតឱ្យបានច្រើនតាមដែល

អាចធ្វើបាន។ អ្នកក៏គួរប្របើ ន្ទបទ់ ឹកដាច់

ដោយឡែក ប្រសិនបើមាន។ ប្រសិនបើ

អ្នកត្រូវនៅជតមន ិ សុ ្សផ្សេងៗទ�ៀតនៅក្នុង

ផ្ទះឬខាងក្រៅផ្ទះសូមពាក់ម៉ាស់។

9. ជៀសវាងការចែករលែំ ករបស់របរ

ផ្ទាលខ្់ លួន ជាមួយមនសុ ្សផ្សេងៗទ�ៀត

ក្នុងគ្រួសាររបស់អ្នក ដូចជា

ចាន កន្សែងពោះគោ

និងពូកភួយខ្នោយជាដម។ើ

10. សម្អាតផ្ទៃទាងអស ំ ់

ដែលត្រូវបានប៉ះជាញឹកញាប់

ដូចជា បញ្ជ រ លើតុ និងដៃទ្វារ។

ប្រស្ព្ើ រៃបាញ់សម្អា តក្នុងផ្ទះ ឬក្រដាស

សើមផ្កតាមការណែ អែ នាំរបស់ស្លាក។ 

cdc.gov/coronavirus
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - 17 CFR Part 230

### CFR Correction

In Title 17 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 200 to 239, revised as of April 1, 2010, on page 686, in § 230.501, following paragraph (e)(3), reinstate the Note to paragraph (e) to read as follows:

§ 230.501 

* * * * *

(e) * * *

**NOTE**                            : The issuer must satisfy all the other provisions of Regulation D for all purchasers whether or not they are included in calculating the number of purchasers. Clients of an investment adviser or customers of a broker or dealer shall be considered the “purchasers” under Regulation D regardless of the amount of discretion given to the investment adviser or broker or dealer to act on behalf of the client or customer.                        

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 2011-6830 Filed 3-21-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1296
HAWA DIALLO TUCKER, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A95-886-686) Submitted: September 14, 2005 Decided: October 17, 2005 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Socheat Chea, SOCHEAT CHEA, P.C., Duluth, Georgia, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Kristin K. Edison, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Hawa Diallo Tucker, a native and citizen of Guinea, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying her motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Tucker’s motion on the alternate ground that she failed to present clear and convincing evidence indicating a strong likelihood that her marriage is bona fide as required by Matter of Velarde-Pacheco , 23 I. & N. Dec. 253 (B.I.A. 2002). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### § 51.32 Establishment and maintenance of registry of interested individuals and groups.

The Attorney General shall establish and maintain a Registry of Interested Individuals and Groups, which shall contain the name and address of any individual or group that wishes to receive notice of section 5 submissions. Information relating to this registry and to the requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a *et seq.,* is contained in JUSTICE/CRT-004. 48 FR 5334 (Feb. 4, 1983).
#### § 1.28 [Reserved]
### §422a–2. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of section 422a–1 of this title, but not more than $243,000 shall be appropriated for the acquisition of lands and interests in lands and not more than $325,000 shall be appropriated for development.

(Sept. 27, 1944, ch. 417, §2, as added Pub. L. 93–477, title I, §101(7), Oct. 26, 1974, 88 Stat. 1445.)