alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 19 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that disqualifying a nominee to Federal 

office on the basis of membership in the Knights of Columbus violates 

the Constitution of the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 16, 2019 

Mr. SASSE submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that disqualifying a nominee to Federal office on the basis of membership in 

the Knights of Columbus violates the Constitution of 

the United States. 

Whereas, throughout the history of the United States, the religious liberty protected by both the First Amendment 

and the No Religious Test Clause of the Constitution of 

the United States has been at the heart of the American 

experiment; 

Whereas, in 1960, the presidential candidacy of John F. Kennedy was met with significant anti-Catholic bigotry; 

Whereas then Senator Kennedy responded to the bigotry with 

these timeless words: ‘‘For while this year it may be a 

Catholic against whom the finger of suspicion is pointed, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 19 ATS 

in other years it has been, and may someday be again, 

a Jew or a Quaker or a Unitarian or a Baptist. . . . 

Today I may be the victim, but tomorrow it may be you, 

until the whole fabric of our harmonious society is ripped 

at a time of great national peril.’’; 

Whereas the Knights of Columbus (in this preamble referred 

to as the ‘‘Knights’’) constitute the largest Catholic fraternal service organization in the world; 

Whereas the Knights have a proud tradition of standing 

against the forces of prejudice and oppression, such as 

the Ku Klux Klan and Nazi Germany; 

Whereas the Knights are founded on the principles of charity, 

unity, fraternity, and patriotism; and 

Whereas, in 2017, the Knights made more than 

$185,000,000 in charitable contributions and volunteered 

more than 75,600,000 service hours: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that dis2 qualifying a nominee to Federal office on the basis of 

3 membership in the Knights of Columbus violates clause 

4 3 of article VI of the Constitution of the United States, 

5 which establishes that Senators ‘‘shall be bound by Oath 

6 or Affirmation, to support th[e] Constitution’’ and ‘‘no re7 ligious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to 

8 any Office or public Trust under the United States’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
§ 811.10 Changes in registration information. ( a ) ( 1 ) A sex offender must notify CSOSA if the sex offender: ( i ) Ceases to live or reside at the registered address or moves to a different address;
( ii ) leaves a job or obtains a new job, or leaves a school or enrolls in a new school; or
( iii ) ceases to own or becomes an owner of any motor vehicle.
( 2 ) A sex offender must notify CSOSA if there is a significant change in the sex offender's appearance and report as directed for the purpose of having a new photograph taken. Any question regarding whether a change in physical appearance is significant is to be referred to CSOSA.
( 3 ) A sex offender must notify CSOSA if the sex offender is moving to another jurisdiction or if the sex offender works or attends school in another jurisdiction and must register in any such jurisdiction.
( b ) Notice of the changes described in paragraph (a) of this section must be in writing and must be provided prior to the change if feasible and in any event within three days of the change. Notices of change in address or place of work or school attendance must include new address, location, and phone number information. Notice relating to ownership of a motor vehicle must include the make, model, color, and license plate number of the vehicle.
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

Washington, D.C. 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 92998 / September 15, 2021

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension of trading 

in the securities of the following issuer, commencing at 9:30 a.m. EDT on September 16, 2021 

and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EDT on September 29, 2021:

 Incoming, Inc. (ICNN)

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of the foregoing company due 

to a lack of current and accurate information about the company because it has not filed certain 

periodic reports with the Commission. This order was entered pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act).

The Commission cautions brokers, dealers, shareholders and prospective purchasers that they 

should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available 

information and any information subsequently issued by this company.

Brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11, at 

the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered relating to the securities 

of the subject company unless and until the broker or dealer has strictly complied with all of the 

provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is required by the rule, it 

should refrain from entering quotations relating to the securities of this company that has been 

subject to a trading suspension until such time as it has familiarized itself with the rule and is 

certain that all of its provisions have been met. Any broker or dealer with questions regarding

the rule should contact the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, DC 

at (202) 551-5777. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation which is in violation of the rule,

the Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement action. 

If any broker, dealer or other person has any information which may relate to this matter, they 

should immediately communicate it to the Delinquent Filings Branch of the Division of 

Enforcement at (202) 551-5466, or by e-mail at DelinquentFilings@sec.gov.
### §410aaa–3. Maps and legal description

Within six months after October 31, 1994, the Secretary shall file maps and a legal description of the park designated under this part with the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the United States Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of the United States House of Representatives. Such maps and legal description shall have the same force and effect as if included in this part, except that the Secretary may correct clerical and typographical errors in such legal description and in the maps referred to in section 410aaa–1 of this title. The maps and legal description shall be on file and available for public inspection in the offices of the Superintendent of the park and the Director of the National Park Service, Department of the Interior.

(Pub. L. 103–433, title III, §304, Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4486.)
§ 636.205 Can past performance be used as an evaluation criteria? ( a ) Yes, past performance information is one indicator of an offeror's ability to perform the contract successfully. Past performance information may be used as an evaluation criteria in either phase-one or phase-two solicitations. If you elect to use past performance criteria, the currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in contractor's performance may be considered.
( b ) Describe your approach for evaluating past performance in the solicitation, including your policy for evaluating offerors with no relevant performance history. You should provide offerors an opportunity to identify past or current contracts (including Federal, State, and local government and private) for efforts similar to the current solicitation.
( c ) If you elect to request past performance information, the solicitation should also authorize offerors to provide information on problems encountered on the identified contracts and the offeror's corrective actions. You may consider this information, as well as information obtained from any other sources, when evaluating the offeror's past performance. You may use your discretion in determining the relevance of similar past performance information.
( d ) The evaluation should take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to the current acquisition.
### §430uu–2. Acquisition of land; exclusion from Beaverhead National Forest; administration

(a) The Secretary of the Interior may acquire by donation, purchase, exchange, or otherwise, lands and interests in lands within the area described in section 430uu–1 of this title.

(b) Any lands described in section 430uu–1 of this title that are a part of the Beaverhead National Forest on May 17, 1963, are hereby excluded from the forest and added to the Big Hole National Battlefield.

(c) Lands included in the Big Hole National Battlefield pursuant to sections 430uu to 430uu–4 of this title shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of the Act entitled "An Act to establish a National Park Service, and for other purposes", approved August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535; 16 U.S.C. 1–3),1 as amended and supplemented.

(Pub. L. 88–24, §3, May 17, 1963, 77 Stat. 19.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Act entitled "An Act to establish a National Park Service, and for other purposes", approved August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535; 16 U.S.C. 1–3), referred to in subsec. (c), is act Aug. 25, 1916, ch. 408, 39 Stat. 535, known as the National Park Service Organic Act, which enacted sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 of this title and provisions set out as a note under section 100101 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs. Sections 1 to 4 of the Act were repealed and restated as section 1865(a) of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and section 100101(a), chapter 1003, and sections 100751(a), 100752, 100753, and 102101 of Title 54 by Pub. L. 113–287, §§3, 4(a)(1), 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3094, 3260, 3272. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables. For disposition of former sections of this title, see Disposition Table preceding section 100101 of Title 54.

1 See References in Text note below.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00053

- CV

Ebony HARDMAN

, Appellants

v.

DIAMOND RIDGE APARTMENTS

, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 390,226 Honorable Jason Pulliam, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE MARION

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, appellant’s motion to dismiss this appeal is GRANTED, and this appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that no costs shall be

as sessed against appellant, Ebony Hardman, in relation to this appeal because she qualifies as indigent under T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.

SIGNED March 12, 2014.

_________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
§ 1208.6 Procedures affecting States in noncompliance. ( a ) Every fiscal year, each State determined to be in noncompliance with the National Minimum Drinking Age, based on NHTSA's and FHWA's preliminary review of its statutes for compliance or non-compliance, will be advised of the funds expected to be withheld under § 1208.4 from apportionment, as part of the advance notice of apportionments required under 23 U.S.C. 104(e), normally not later than ninety days prior to final apportionment.
( b ) If NHTSA and FHWA determine that the State is in noncompliance with the National Minimum Drinking Age based on their preliminary review, the State may, within 30 days of its receipt of the advance notice of apportionments, submit documentation showing why it is in compliance. Documentation shall be submitted to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
( c ) Every fiscal year, each State determined to be in noncompliance with the National Minimum Drinking Age, based on NHTSA's and FHWA's final determination of compliance or noncompliance, will receive notice of the funds being withheld under § 1208.4 from apportionment, as part of the certification of apportionments required under 23 U.S.C. 104(e), which normally occurs on October 1 of each fiscal year.
[53 FR 31322, Aug. 18, 1988. Redesignated at 60 FR 66076, Dec. 21, 1995, as amended at 74 FR 28442, June 16, 2009]
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,903

EX PARTE RUBEN MAGANA, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. B-07-2141-0-CR-B IN THE 156 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM BEE COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts of

driving while intoxicated with a passenger under the age of 15 and sentenced to five years’

imprisonment in each case, to run consecutive to two other cases. He did not appeal his conviction. 

Applicant contended that he is serving an illegal sentences and that his plea was involuntary

because, inter alia, trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance of counsel. We remanded this

application to the trial court for a response from counsel and findings of fact and conclusions of law.

The trial court did not obtain an affidavit from counsel and did not make findings addressing
2

Applicant’s claims that counsel was ineffective. However, based on the record, the trial court

determined that Applicant’s sentences are illegal. Applicant is entitled to relief. Ex Parte Rich, 194

S.W.3d 508 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. B-07-2141-0-CR-B in the 156 District Court th

of Bee County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Bee County

to answer the charges as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench

warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies ofthis opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: October 31, 2012

Do not publish
§ 90.62 Purposes. ( a ) Purpose areas for the program are provided by 42 U.S.C. 3796hh(b).
( b ) Grants awarded for these purposes must demonstrate meaningful attention to victim safety and offender accountability.
§ 76.9 Responsive pleading—answer. ( a ) *Time for answer.* A respondent shall file and serve on the United States Attorney having jurisdiction over the matter an answer within thirty (30) days after the service of a complaint.
( b ) *Default.* Failure of the respondent to file and serve an answer within the time provided shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of his or her right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint. In such cases, the Judge may enter a judgment by default.
( c ) *Answer.* Any respondent contesting any material fact alleged in a complaint, or contending that he or she is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, shall file an answer in writing. ( 1 ) The answer shall include a statement of the facts supporting each affirmative defense.
( 2 ) The answer shall include a statement that the respondent admits, denies, does not have and is unable to obtain sufficient information to admit or deny each allegation, or that an answer to the allegation is protected by a privilege, including the privilege against self-incrimination.
( 3 ) A statement of lack of information or a statement that the answer to the allegation is privileged shall have the effect of a denial.
( 4 ) Any allegation not denied shall be deemed to be admitted.
( d ) *Reply.* A complainant may file a reply responding to each affirmative defense arrested if the Judge, pursuant to 28 CFR 76.10, so provides.
( e ) *Amendments and supplemental pleadings.* If it will facilitate resolution of the controversy, the Judge may, upon such conditions as are necessary to avoid prejudicing the public interest and the rights of the parties, allow appropriate amendments to complaints and other pleadings at any time prior to the issuance of the Judge's order based on the complaint. When issues not raised by the pleadings are reasonably within the scope of the original complaint and are tried by express or implied consent of the parties, they shall be treated in all respects as if they had been raised in the pleadings, and such amendments may be made as necessary to make the pleadings conform to the evidence. The Judge may, upon reasonable notice and such terms as are just, permit supplemental pleadings setting forth transactions, occurrences, or events which have happened or new law promulgated since the date of the pleadings and which are relevant to any of the issues involved.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on February 24, 2011, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Interchangeable Virtual Instruments Foundation, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Kikusui Electronics Corp., Yokohama City, Kanagawa, Japan, has been added as a party to this venture. Also, ICS Electronics, Pleasanton, CA; and BAE Systems, San Diego, CA, have withdrawn as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Interchangeable Virtual Instruments Foundation, Inc. intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On May 29, 2001, Interchangeable Virtual Instruments Foundation, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 30, 2001 (66 FR 39336).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 8, 2010. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act September 8, 2010 (75 FR 54652).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2011-6917 Filed 3-24-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
§ 636.304 What process may be used to rate and score proposals? ( a ) Proposal evaluation is an assessment of the offeror's proposal and ability to perform the prospective contract successfully. You must evaluate proposals solely on the factors and subfactors specified in the solicitation.
( b ) You may conduct evaluations using any rating method or combination of methods including color or adjectival ratings, numerical weights, and ordinal rankings. The relative strengths, deficiencies, significant weaknesses, and risks supporting proposal evaluation must be documented in the contract file.
#### § 630.1104 Definitions.

For the purposes of this subpart, the following definitions apply:

*Agency* means a State or local highway agency or authority that receives Federal-aid highway funding.

*Exposure Control Measures* means traffic management strategies to avoid work zone crashes involving workers and motorized traffic by eliminating or reducing traffic through the work zone, or diverting traffic away from the work space.

*Federal-aid Highway Project* means highway construction, maintenance, and utility projects funded in whole or in part with Federal-aid funds.

*Motorized Traffic* means the motorized traveling public. This term does not include motorized construction or maintenance vehicles and equipment within the work space.

*Other Traffic Control Measures* means all strategies and temporary traffic controls other than Positive Protection Devices and Exposure Control Measures, but including uniformed law enforcement officers, used to reduce the risk of work zone crashes involving motorized traffic.

*Positive Protection Devices* means devices that contain and/or redirect vehicles and meet the crashworthiness evaluation criteria contained in National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 350, Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features, 1993, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council. The Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. This document is available for inspection and copying at FHWA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, as provided in 49 CFR part 7. You may also inspect a copy at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call (202) 741 6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.*

*Work Zone Safety Management* means the entire range of traffic management and control and highway safety strategies and devices used to avoid crashes in work zones that can lead to worker and road user injuries and fatalities, including Positive Protection Devices, Exposure Control Measures, and Other Traffic Control Measures.
### §1a–7a. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 91–383, §13, as added Pub. L. 103–322, title IV, §40132, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1917, related to National Park System crime prevention assistance. See section 102702 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
Respondent has filed an opposition to the counter-motion to 

treat the pending notice of appeal as a writ petition. Respondent notes 

that such alternative relief is unnecessary as it is clear that the proper 

way to challenge an order regarding disqualification of counsel is by a writ 

of mandamus and appellants have filed such a writ. Appellants have filed 

a reply to respondent's opposition to the counter-motion. Appellants 

emphasize that they do not oppose dismissal of this appeal as long as their 

writ petition is allowed to proceed. 

After consideration of the parties' filing in this appeal and in 

light of the pending petition for a writ of mandamus, we dismiss this 

appeal. 

It is so ORDERED. 

Gibbons 

Saitta 

cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge 

Salvatore C. Gugino, Settlement Judge 

Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara, LLP 

Richard Harris Law Firm 

Prince & Keating, LLP 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

J. 

J. 

J. 

2