alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 92.4 How will participants be selected from applicants? ( a ) Applicants should be selected competitively based upon selection criteria developed by the State Police Corps agency pursuant to this subsection. Appropriate application materials should be developed by the State Police Corps agency to obtain the information reasonably needed to make selection and assignment decisions and to provide required information to the Director.
( b ) The State Police Corps agency should develop selection criteria in consultation with local law enforcement officials, representatives of police labor organizations and police management organizations, and other appropriate State and local agencies. Selection criteria should seek to attract highly qualified individuals with backgrounds and characteristics likely to assure effective participation in the Police Corps. Criteria should include consideration of factors bearing on the statutory eligibility requirements set forth in § 92.1, and may include (without limitation) consideration of: ( 1 ) Scholastic record;
( 2 ) Work experience;
( 3 ) Extracurricular and/or community involvement;
( 4 ) Letters of recommendation;
( 5 ) Demonstrated interest in policing as a career.
( c ) After selection, the State Police Corps agency will forward to the Director, Office of the Police Corps and Law Enforcement Education a list of persons selected for admission to the Police Corps. With respect to each person, the list should set forth: ( 1 ) Name;
( 2 ) Address;
( 3 ) Social security number;
( 4 ) Name and location of law enforcement agency to which the person has been assigned;
( 5 ) Educational institution in which the person is enrolled or has been accepted for admission, and course of study;
( 6 ) Date on which the person is expected to commence his/her service;
( 7 ) Certification that the person has been found to meet the statutory selection criteria at 42 U.S.C. § 14096;
( 8 ) A Police Corps Agreement signed by the applicant; and
( 9 ) An itemization of the educational expenses that the person is eligible to receive through scholarship and/or reimbursement. ( i ) With respect to individuals identified to receive educational assistance under § 92.2(c), the list should contain the information in paragraphs (c) (1), (2), (3), (5) and (9) of this section.
( ii ) With respect to the list in the aggregate, a summary of the racial and gender distribution of the individuals.
( d ) After selection, the State Policy Corps agency should notify applicants of their selection, their agency assignment, and their assignment to a training class. However, admission to the Police Corps is not final until the Police Corps Agreement has been signed both by the applicant and the Director.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

July 25, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00452

- CV

MGR, INC. and Miracle Body and Paint, Incorporated d/b/a/ Miracle Body and Paint

, Appellant s

v.

GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY

, Appellee

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015

- CI

- 18092 Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On July 19, 2018, we ordered appellant to provide written proof that the clerk’s fee has been paid. On July 23, 2018, appellant responded, showing payment was made on July 20,

2018. Accordingly, the clerk’s record is due on or before August 19, 2018.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 25th day of July, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
<PAGE>   1




                                  Exhibit 23.01

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-36599, 33-61233, 33-61231, 33-21352 and 2-98101) pertaining
to the Stock Option and Incentive Plans of Grey Advertising Inc. of our report
dated February 15, 2000 on the consolidated financial statements of Grey
Advertising Inc. and consolidated subsidiary companies included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.




                                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                                         -----------------------
                                                              ERNST & YOUNG LLP


New York, New York
March 30, 2000
### §410n. Drainage of lands; right-of-way

Unless the Secretary, after notice and opportunity for hearing, shall find that the same is seriously detrimental to the preservation and propagation of the flora or fauna of Everglades National Park, he shall permit such drainage through the natural waterways of the park and the construction, operation, and maintenance of artificial works for conducting water thereto as is required for the reclamation by the State of Florida or any political subdivision thereof or any drainage district organized under its laws of lands lying easterly of the eastern boundary of the park in township 54 south, ranges 31 and 32 east, township 55 south, ranges 32 and 33 east, and township 56 south, range 33 east. He shall grant said permission, however, only after a master plan for the drainage of said lands has been approved by the State of Florida and after finding that the approved plan has engineering feasibility and is so designed as to minimize disruptions of the natural state of the park. Any right-of-way granted pursuant to this section shall be revocable upon breach of the conditions upon which it is granted, which conditions shall also be enforcible in any other appropriate manner, and the grantee shall be obligated to remove its improvements and to restore the land occupied by it to its previous condition in the event of such revocation.

(Pub. L. 85–482, §6, July 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 286.)
§ 106.1 Authority. ( a ) Under section 3 of the HAVANA Act of 2021, Public Law 117-46, 135 Stat. 391 (2021) (codified at 22 U.S.C. 2680b(i)), the Attorney General or other agency heads may provide a payment to a covered employee or covered dependent who experiences a qualifying injury to the brain on or after January 1, 2016. The authority to provide such payments is at the discretion of the Attorney General or the Attorney General's designees.
( b ) These regulations are issued in accordance with 22 U.S.C. 2680b(i)(4) and apply to covered employees (current and former employees) and covered dependents.
[A.G. Order No. 5922-2024, 89 FR 28636, Apr. 19, 2024; 89 FR 36671, May 3, 2024]
### §426o–1. Planning

#### (a) Preparation of plan for Redoubt Brannan

The Secretary shall, on or before February 1, 1992, prepare a plan for the preservation and interpretation of Redoubt Brannan.

#### (b) Update of General Management Plan

The Secretary shall, on or before March 31, 1993, update the General Management Plan for the Stones River National Battlefield.

#### (c) Technical assistance

The Secretary is authorized to provide technical assistance to the city and to Rutherford County in the development of zoning ordinances and other land use controls that would help preserve historically significant areas adjacent to the battlefield.

#### (d) Minor boundary revisions

If the planning activities conducted under subsections (a) and (b) of this section show a need for minor revisions of the boundaries indicated on the map referred to in section 426n of this title, the Secretary may, following timely notice in writing to the Committee on Natural Resources of the United States House of Representatives and to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the United States Senate of his intention to do so and providing an opportunity for public comment, make such minor revisions by publication of a revised boundary map or other description in the Federal Register.

(Pub. L. 100–205, §3, as added Pub. L. 102–225, §1(4), Dec. 11, 1991, 105 Stat. 1683; amended Pub. L. 103–437, §6(d)(15), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4584.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3 of Pub. L. 100–205 was renumbered section 4 and is classified to section 426p of this title.

#### Amendments

1994—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 103–437 substituted "Natural Resources" for "Interior and Insular Affairs" after "Committee on".
§ 680.114 Charging network connectivity of electric vehicle charging infrastructure. ( a ) *Charger-to-charger-network communication.* ( 1 ) Chargers must communicate with a charging network via a secure communication method. See § 680.108 for more information about OCPP requirements.
( 2 ) Chargers must have the ability to receive and implement secure, remote software updates and conduct real-time protocol translation, encryption and decryption, authentication, and authorization in their communication with charging networks.
( 3 ) Charging networks must perform and chargers must support remote charger monitoring, diagnostics, control, and smart charge management.
( 4 ) Chargers and charging networks must securely measure, communicate, store, and report energy and power dispensed, real-time charging-port status, real-time price to the customer, and historical charging-port uptime.
( b ) *Interoperability.* See § 680.108 for interoperability requirements.
( c ) *Charging-network-to-charging-network communication.* A charging network must be capable of communicating with other charging networks to enable an EV driver to use a single method of identification to charge at Charging Stations that are a part of multiple charging networks. See § 680.108 for more information about OCPI requirements.
( d ) *Charging-network-to-grid communication.* Charging networks must be capable of secure communication with electric utilities, other energy providers, or local energy management systems.
( e ) *Disrupted network connectivity.* Chargers must remain functional if communication with the charging network is temporarily disrupted, such that they initiate and complete charging sessions, providing the minimum required power level defined in § 680.106(d).
Editorial Note on Part 635
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 635 appear at 67 FR 75924, Dec. 10, 2002.

§ 635.205 Finding of cost effectiveness. ( a ) It may be found cost effective for a State transportation department or county to undertake a federally financed highway construction project by force account when a situation exists in which the rights or resposibilities of the community at large are so affected as to require some special course of action, including situations where there is a lack of bids or the bids received are unreasonable.
( b ) Pursuant to authority in 23 U.S.C. 112(b), it is hereby determined that by reason of the inherent nature of the operations involved, it is cost effective to perform by force account the adjustment of railroad or utility facilities and similar types of facilities owned or operated by a public agency, a railroad, or a utility company provided that the organization is qualified to perform the work in a satisfactory manner. The installation of new facilities shall be undertaken by competitive bidding except as provided in § 635.204(c). Adjustment of railroad facilities shall include minor work on the railroad's operating facilities routinely performed by the railroad with its own forces such as the installation of grade crossing warning devices, crossing surfaces, and minor track and signal work. Adjustment of utility facilities shall include minor work on the utility's existing facilities routinely performed by the utility with its own forces and includes minor installations of new facilities to provide power, minor lighting, telephone, water and similar utility service to a rest area, weigh-station, movable bridge, or other highway appurtenance, provided such installation cannot feasibly be done as incidental to a major installation project such as an extensive highway lighting system.
[52 FR 45173, Nov. 25, 1987]
### §410aaa–81. Juniper Flats

Development of renewable energy generation facilities (excluding rights-of-way or facilities for the transmission of energy and telecommunication facilities and infrastructure) is prohibited on the approximately 27,990 acres of Federal land generally depicted as "BLM Land Unavailable for Energy Development" on the map entitled "Juniper Flats" and dated November 7, 2018.

(Pub. L. 103–433, title VII, §711, as added Pub. L. 116–9, title I, §1459, Mar. 12, 2019, 133 Stat. 718.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 410aaa–81, Pub. L. 103–433, title VII, §711, Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4501, which defined the term "this Act" for purposes of titles I through IX of Pub. L. 103–433, was repealed by Pub. L. 116–9, title I, §1459, Mar. 12, 2019, 133 Stat. 718. See section 3 of Pub. L. 103–433, set out as a Definitions note under section 410aaa of this title.
### §423o. Administration, protection, and development

The administration, protection, and development of the aforesaid battlefield site shall be exercised under the direction of the Secretary of the Interior by the National Park Service, subject to the provisions of the Act of August 25, 1916, entitled "An Act to establish a National Park Service, and for other purposes",1 as amended.

(June 26, 1936, ch. 840, §3, 49 Stat. 1975.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Act of August 25, 1916, entitled "An Act to establish a National Park Service, and for other purposes", referred to in text, is act Aug. 25, 1916, ch. 408, 39 Stat. 535, known as the National Park Service Organic Act, which enacted sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 of this title and provisions set out as a note under section 100101 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs. Sections 1 to 4 of the Act were repealed and restated as section 1865(a) of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and section 100101(a), chapter 1003, and sections 100751(a), 100752, 100753, and 102101 of Title 54 by Pub. L. 113–287, §§3, 4(a)(1), 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3094, 3260, 3272. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables. For disposition of former sections of this title, see Disposition Table preceding section 100101 of Title 54.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

1 See References in Text note below.
§ 552.26 Medical attention in use of force and application of restraints incidents. ( a ) In immediate use of force situations, staff shall seek the assistance of mental health or qualified health personnel upon gaining physical control of the inmate. When possible, staff shall seek such assistance at the onset of the violent behavior. In calculated use of force situations, the use of force team leader shall seek the guidance of qualified health personnel (based upon a review of the inmate's medical record) to identify physical or mental problems. When mental health staff or qualified health personnel determine that an inmate requires continuing care, and particularly when the inmate to be restrained is pregnant, the deciding staff shall assume responsibility for the inmate's care, to include possible admission to the institution hospital, or, in the case of a pregnant inmate, restraining her in other than face down four-point restraints.
( b ) After any use of force or forcible application of restraints, the inmate shall be examined by qualified health personnel, and any injuries noted, immediately treated.
[61 FR 39801, July 30, 1996]
§ 91.59 OJP's responsibilities. ( a ) *In general.* All NEPA decisions such as determining the adequacy of assessments, the need for environmental impact statements, and their adequacy must, by statute, remain with OJP. Therefore, OJP, as the Federal agency sponsoring the major federal action, shall determine if a proposed project qualifies for a categorical exclusion, if a finding of no significant impact can be issued based on the EA, or if an EIS will be required.
( b ) *Specific duties.* As part of its role in the NEPA process, OJP shall: ( 1 ) Issue guidance on the preparation of environmental documents and the NEPA process.
( 2 ) Review all draft documents.
( 3 ) Participate in giving notice to state and federal agencies, as well as to the public, and attend public meetings with the grantee, as appropriate.
( 4 ) Identify and solicit appropriate state, local, and tribal agencies to be a cooperating or joint lead agency, as appropriate.
( 5 ) Prepare a written assessment of any environmental impacts that another state or federal land management or environmental protection agency believes have not been adequately addressed through the NEPA process.
( 6 ) Monitor implementation by the states to ensure the completion of any required mitigation measures.
( 7 ) Develop a sample Statement of Work for preparing an EIS that States employing their own contractor can use to ensure that the services provided meet the requirements.
#### In the Matter of Joseph S. Somberg, Petitioner, against Frieda S. Miller, as Industrial Commissioner of the State of New York, Respondent.

First Department,

June 11, 1943.

*329
      *Harold Flatto*for petitioner.

*Irving Galt*of counsel *{Orrin G. Judd*and *Isaac Frank*with him on the brief; *Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General),*for respondent.

Determination confirmed with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.

Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore and Callahan, JJ., concur ; Untermyer, J., dissents, in opinion.

Untermyer, J.

(dissenting). The Medical Board by which the appellant was tried (Workmen’s Compensation Law, art. 2, § 13-d) was improperly constituted by the inclusion of the respondent, Industrial Commissioner of the State of New York, who assumed the chairmanship of the Board and the direction of the proceedings. Not only is there no express authority for this in the statute, but it is evident that such a procedure could not have been intended since the statute provides for a review of the determination of the Medical Board by the Industrial Council, of which the Industrial Commissioner is chairman (Labor Law, § 10-a, subd. 2). It is true that the statute (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 13-d, subd. 2) requires removal by the Commissioner *“*after reasonable investigation ” of any physician who has been guilty of the acts therein specified. Such an investigation, however, is not to be conducted during the proceedings of the Medical Board since, by the express language of the statute, it is limited to an investigation “ either before or after investigation by a medical society or board.” The illegal organization of the Medical Board by which the petitioner was found guilty, in my opinion, is fatal to the proceeding.

The determination of the Industrial Commissioner suspending the petitioner should be annulled and the proceeding remitted for a trial in accordance with the provisions of section 13-d of article 2 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law.
#### § 345.65 Inmate medical work limitation.

In addition to any prior illnesses or injuries, medical limitations also include any illness or injury sustained by an inmate which necessitates removing the ill worker from an FPI work assignment. If an inmate worker is injured more than once in a comparatively short time, and the circumstances of the injury suggest an awkwardness or ineptitude which in turn indicates that further danger exists, the inmate may be removed to another FPI detail or to a non-FPI detail.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY 

AND POLLUTION PREVENTION

MEMORANDUM

Date: July 01, 2014

SUBJECT: 2,6-Dichlorobenzamide (BAM). An Assessment of BAM Dietary Exposure Based on 

Current Percent Crop Treated Data to Support Increased Fluopicolide Tolerances. 

PC Code: 027402 (BAM), 027412 (Fluopicolide), 027401 (Dichlobenil) DP Barcode: D421238

Decision No.: 481091 Registration No.: 59639-139

Petition No.: 3F8191 Regulatory Action: Section 3

Risk Assessment Type: Not Applicable Case No.: Not Applicable

TXR No.: Not Applicable CAS No.: 2008-54-4

MRID No.: None 40 CFR: §180.627

FROM: Peter Savoia, Chemist

Risk Assessment Branch V/VII

Health Effects Division (7509P)

THRU: Michael S. Metzger, Branch Chief

Risk Assessment Branch V/VII

Health Effects Division (7509P)

TO: Laura Nollen, Biologist

Minor Use Team

and

Tony Kish, Product Manager 

Fungicide Branch

Registration Division (7505P)

2,6-dichlorobenzamide or “BAM”, is a metabolite of two pesticide active ingredients, fluopicolide 

and dichlobenil. Residues of BAM are considered to be of regulatory concern having separate 

toxicity data and endpoints selected for risk assessment. Recently, the Valent U.S.A. Corporation 

submitted PP# 3F8191 to amend the fluopicolide tolerances established on tuberous and corm 

subgroup 1C vegetables and potato processed waste. Because these increased tolerances do not add 

to the dietary exposure of BAM, the conclusions from the most recently conducted 2008 BAM

human health risk assessment remain unchanged (D354111, D. Rate, 06/19/08). Although it remains

applicable in supporting this action, the dichlobenil percent crop treated estimates for some 

commodities underlying the BAM assessment generated in 2007 were found to have increased. Other 

than the new estimate for pears, the percent crop treated estimates did not change or were negligible 

since they are all at the lower reporting limit and will not affect the overall BAM dietary exposure. 

For pears, dietary analyses were thus performed to compare its contribution to exposure since the new 

percent crop treated estimate is appreciably higher (5% for the avg.). In comparison, these results 

show that the impact from pears is negligible in contributing to the dietary exposure of BAM. 

Therefore, the conclusions of the 2008 BAM human health risk assessment remain applicable to 

support the increased fluopicolide tolerances on tuberous and corm vegetables.
Order entered April 22, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01389-CV

GEORGE JONES RESIDENTIAL, LLC, Appellant

V.

ANTONIO L. ADAMS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-03973-D

ORDER

Appellant George Jones Residential, LLC is not currently represented by counsel. 

Because in Texas, a corporation may appear and be represented in court only by a licensed 

attorney, appellant is DIRECTED to provide the Court, within thirty (30) days of the date of this 

letter, the name of its counsel as well as counsel’s mailing address, telephone number, fax 

number, if any, and State Bar of Texas identification number. If the requested information is not 

received within the time specified, this appeal will be dismissed without further notice. 

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE