alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A,

Pla i ntiff-Appe lle e , v. R AFAEL PEREZ-M ENC H AC A,

De fe nda nt-Appe l la

nt. No. 15-50060

D.C . No. 3:14-c r-03027-AJB M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Southe rn Distric t of C a lifornia Anthony J. B atta glia , Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Oc tobe r 25, 2016 * * B e fore : LEAVY, GR AB ER , a nd C H RISTEN, C irc uit Judge s. R a fa e l Pe re z -M e nc h a c a

a ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha lle nge s the 42-m onth se nte n c e im pose d following his guilty -ple a c onvic tion for im porta tion of m e tha

m phe tam ine , in viola

t ion of 21 U.S.C . §§ 952 a nd 960. W e 

# FIL ED N OV 01 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.

* * The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).have jurisdic tion under 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we va c ate and re m and for re se nte nc ing. Pe re z -M e nc ha c a

argue s tha

t the distric t c ourt e rre d in de ny i ng a m inor role re duc t ion to his ba se offe nse le ve l unde r U.S.S.G. § 3B 1.2(b). Afte r Pe re z M e n c h a c a

wa s se nte nc e d , the Unite d State s Se nte nc ing C o m m ission issue d Am e ndm e nt 794 (“the Am e ndm e nt” ), whic h am e nde d the c om m e nta ry to the m inor role Guide line . The Am e ndm e nt is re troa c tive to c a se s pe nding on dire c t a ppe a l. Se eUnite d State

s v . Quinte ro-Le

y v a , 823 F.3d 519, 523 (9th C ir. 2016). The Am e ndm e nt c la

rifie d tha t, in a sse s sing whe the r a

de fe nda nt should re c e ive a m inor role a djustm e nt, thec ourt should c om pa re him to the othe r pa rtic i pa nts in the c rim e , rathe r tha n to a hy pothe tic a l a

ve ra ge pa rtic ipa nt. Se e U.S.S.G. App. C . Am e nd. 794; Quinte ro-Le y v a , 823 F.3d a

t 523. In a ddition, the Am e ndm e nt c la

rifie d tha t “ [t] he fa c t tha

t a de fe nda nt pe rform s a

n e sse ntia l or indispe nsa

ble role in thec rim ina l a c tivity is not de te rm inative .” U.S.S.G. § 3B 1.2 c m t. n.3(C ) (2015). Fina lly , the Am e ndm e nt a dde d a non-e xha ustivelist of fa c tors that a c ourt “ should c onside r” in de te rm ining whe the r to a pply a m inor role re duc t ion. Se eid. B e c a

use we c annot de te rm ine from the re c ord whe the r the distric t c o urt followe d

the guida nc e of the Am e ndm e nt’ s c la rify ing la n gua g e and c onside re d a ll of thenow-re le va nt fa c tors, we va c ate Pe re z -M e nc h a c a ’ s se nte nc e 1 5 - 5 0 0 6 0 2and re m and for re s e nte nc ing unde r the Am e ndm e nt. Se eQuinte ro-Le y v a , 823 F.3d at 523-24. VACAT E D and RE M ANDE D for r e se nte nc i ng.

1 5 - 5 0 0 6 0 3
Exhibit 32B

THE GILLETTE COMPANYCertificationPursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code, the undersigned, Charles W. Cramb, Chief Financial Officer
of The Gillette Company, a Delaware corporation (the Company), does
hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Form
10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Exchange Act and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

|Date:    March 8, 2005 | /s/ Charles W. Cramb___________________________________
Charles W. CrambSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer
|---------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The Gillette Company (the Company) and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### Buster Boy Suit Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Abraham Geller, Appellant.

No opinion. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
### §460hhh–3. Management

#### (a) In general

The Secretary, acting through the Chief of the Forest Service, shall manage the Recreation Area in accordance with the laws, rules, and regulations pertaining to the National Forest System and this subchapter to provide for—

(1) the conservation of scenic, scientific, historic, cultural, and other values contributing to public enjoyment;

(2) the conservation of fish and wildlife populations and habitat, including the use of prescribed fire to improve or maintain habitat;

(3) the protection of watersheds and the maintenance of free flowing streams and the quality of ground and surface waters in accordance with applicable law;

(4) public outdoor recreation benefits, including, but not limited to, hunting, fishing, trapping, hiking, horseback riding, backpacking, rock climbing, camping, and nature study;

(5) wilderness areas as designated by Congress; and

(6) the management and use of natural resources in a manner compatible with the purposes for which the Recreation Area is established.

#### (b) Hunting, trapping, and fishing

#### (1) In general

Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary shall permit hunting, trapping, fishing, and habitat management within the Recreation Area in accordance with the laws of the United States and the State of Nevada.

#### (2) Exceptions

The Secretary, in consultation with the Nevada Department of Wildlife, may designate zones where and periods when hunting, trapping, or fishing shall not be permitted for reasons of public safety, administration, or public use and enjoyment.

#### (c) Grazing

The grazing of livestock on Federal lands may be permitted to continue pursuant to Federal law and subject to such reasonable regulations, policies, and practices as the Secretary considers necessary.

#### (d) Preventive measures

Nothing in this subchapter shall preclude such reasonable measures as the Secretary considers necessary to protect the land and resources from fire or insect or disease infestation in the Recreation Area.

(Pub. L. 103–63, §5, Aug. 4, 1993, 107 Stat. 298.)
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 22, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 15841]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6830]



[[Page 15841]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 230


General Rules and Regulations, Securities Act of 1933

CFR Correction

    In Title 17 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 200 to 239, 
revised as of April 1, 2010, on page 686, in Sec.  230.501, following 
paragraph (e)(3), reinstate the Note to paragraph (e) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  230.501  Definitions and terms used in Regulation D.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *
    NOTE: The issuer must satisfy all the other provisions of 
Regulation D for all purchasers whether or not they are included in 
calculating the number of purchasers. Clients of an investment adviser 
or customers of a broker or dealer shall be considered the 
``purchasers'' under Regulation D regardless of the amount of 
discretion given to the investment adviser or broker or dealer to act 
on behalf of the client or customer.
* * * * *

[FR Doc. 2011-6830 Filed 3-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of Guilford Mills, Inc. for the year ended September 29,
1996, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-02-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-29-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          31,448
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  181,520
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (9,487)
<INVENTORY>                                    137,993
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               351,888
<PP&E>                                         663,328
<DEPRECIATION>                                 353,364
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 728,830
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          174,230
<BONDS>                                        209,435
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           393
<OTHER-SE>                                     297,666
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   728,830
<SALES>                                        830,320
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               830,320
<CGS>                                          676,264
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  758,694
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,640
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,017
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 50,969
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,991
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,978
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,978
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.19
        


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

February 22, 2021

____________________________________

IN THE MATTER OF :

BANGI, Inc. : ORDER OF SUSPENSION

: OF TRADING

File No. 500-1 : 

____________________________________

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that the public interest and the 

protection of investors require a suspension in the trading of the securities of Bangi, Inc.

(symbol: “BNGI”) (CIK No. 0001327238), a defaulted Nevada Corporation based in Grosse 

Pointe Farms, Michigan, because of questions regarding the accuracy and adequacy of 

information about BNGI and its securities in the marketplace concerning, among other things, 

BNGI’s activities, and potentially fraudulent trading activity affecting the market for its 

securities, including: (a) since at least mid-January 2021, certain social media accounts may be 

engaged in a coordinated attempt to artificially influence BNGI’s share price; and (b) BNGI’s 

share price and trading volume have greatly increased since at least mid-January 2021 in the 

absence of any publicly available news from BNGI. 

BNGI’s common stock is quoted and traded on OTC Link whose parent company is OTC 

Markets Group Inc., under the symbol BNGI. As of February 17, 2021, BNGI’s stock had six 

market makers and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c2-

11(f)(3). 
- 2 -

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors 

require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company. 

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange 

Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the above-listed company is suspended for the 

period from 9:30 a.m. EST, on February 23, 2021 through 11:59 p.m. EST on March 8, 2021. 

By the Commission.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary
#### § 76.25 Fees.

Unless otherwise ordered by the Judge, the party requesting a subpoena shall pay the cost of the fees and mileage of any witness subpoenaed. Such costs shall be in the amounts that would be payable to a witness in a proceeding in United States district court. A check for witness fees and mileage shall accompany the subpoena when served, except that when a subpoena is issued on behalf of the complainant, a check for witness fees and mileage need not accompany the subpoena.
#### Lewis Martin *v.*The People of the State of Illinois.

Criminal *law—judgment on conviction for several offenses.*Where a defendant is convicted of several offenses under different counts of the same indictment, it is error to render judgment ordering the imprisonment of the defendant a gross number of days in all. It should fix the imprisonment for a specific, number of days on each count on which a conviction is had, the imprisonment on the several counts to commence at the expiration of each preceding term.

*500Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Champaign county; the Hon. C. B. Smith, Judge, presiding.

This was an indictment against Lewis Martin for selling intoxicating liquors without a license, to be drunk on the premises where sold. The indictment contained twelve counts. On a trial, the defendant was found guilty, as charged in each of the twelve counts, and the court rendered judgment for a fine of $600, and ordered that the defendant be committed to the county jail for 180 days.

Messrs. Sweet & Day, for the plaintiff in error

Mr. Jas. K. Edsall, Attorney General, for the People.

Per Curiam :

The judgment in this case was fatally defective. The judgment for imprisonment was for 180 days in gross. It should have fixed the imprisonment for a specific number of days on each count on which the jury found the defendant guilty, the imprisonment on the several counts to • commence at the expiration of each preceding term of imprisonment. This is the rule announced in the case of *People ex rel. Massy*v. *Whitson,*75 Ill.-. That case governs this.

The judgment of the court below is reversed and the cause remanded.

*Judgment reversed.*
#### § 80.1 Purpose.

These procedures enable issuers and domestic concerns to obtain an opinion of the Attorney General as to whether certain specified, prospective—not hypothetical—conduct conforms with the Department's present enforcement policy regarding the antibribery provisions of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 78dd-1 and 78dd-2. An opinion issued pursuant to these procedures is a Foreign Corrupt Practices Act opinion (hereinafter FCPA Opinion).
#### § 68.50 Receipt of documents after hearing.

Documents submitted for the record after the close of the hearing will not be received in evidence except upon ruling of the Administrative Law Judge. Such documents when submitted shall be accompanied by proof that copies have been served upon all parties, who shall have an opportunity to comment thereon. Copies shall be received not later than twenty (20) days after the close of the hearing except for good cause shown, and not less than ten (10) days prior to the date set for filing briefs. Exhibit numbers should be assigned by counsel or the party.

[54 FR 48596, Nov. 24, 1989. Redesignated by Order No. 1534-91, 56 FR 50053, Oct. 3, 1991]
### §1112. Tax treatment of any gift, devise or bequest to the Commission

For the purpose of Federal income, estate, and gift taxes, any gift, devise, or bequest to or for the use of the Commission, and accepted by the Commission under authority of this chapter, shall be deemed to be a gift, devise, or bequest to or for the use of the United States, as the case may be, if it is not deducted as a gift, devise, or bequest to or for the use of the Government of Canada under the income, estate, or gift tax laws of the Government of Canada.

(Pub. L. 88–363, §13, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.)
(No. 79-CC-0757

#### Auffenberg Leasing, Inc., and Mearl Shelton, Claimants, *v.*The State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June 21, 1982.*

Theodore E. Diaz, for Claimants.

Tyrone C. Fahner, Attorney General (William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.

Poch, J.

This claim is for property damages due to an accident which occurred March 18, 1978, at the intersection of Highway 159 and the west exit ramp of 1-64 in Fairview Heights, Illinois. There were two drivers involved in the accident, Dr. Peter Bartsch and Mearl Shelton.

Dr. Bartsch was driving north on Highway 159 and passing through the intersection with the west exit ramp of 1-64 at the time of the accident. Dr. Bartsch told police officers at the scene that the traffic light for his automobile was green as he went through the intersection.

Claimant Shelton was exiting 1-64 by the west ramp *223to proceed south on Highway 159 at the time of the accident. He also claims his light was green as he went through the intersection.

Claimant Auffenberg Leasing, Inc., owned the car Dr. Bartsch was driving. Both Claimants therefore have brought this suit, alleging that the State was negligent in maintaining the traffic signals.

The extent of the Claimants’ evidence is that Mr. Shelton testified that his light was green, the police officer testified that Dr. Bartsch said his light was green, and a passenger in a third car following Dr. Bartsch testified that he assumed the light was green, because the car in which he was riding did not slow down in preparation to stop for a red light. This witness never actually saw the traffic signals.

Respondent, on the other hand, presented evidence by the Illinois Department of Transportation that they had thoroughly checked the traffic signal following the accident and had determined that the system was operating perfectly. Mr. Waggoner, an electrical technician for the Department of Transportation, testified that this particular system was equipped with a back-up system that automatically switches the lights to a flashing red signal if the normal system fails and two green lights appear in conflict to each other. Mr. Verschuyl, the electrician who serviced the lights, testified that the secondary system was working perfectly when he checked, and it had not been tripped by conflicting green lights.

Evidence was also received as to the damage suffered by the owner of each vehicle.

It is the opinion of the Court that it is more probable that one of the drivers failed to properly observe the *224traffic light facing his vehicle and ran a red light. While the evidence indicates this was most likely done inadvertently by the driver who believed he had a green light, the Respondent cannot be held liable for the damages caused by the negligence of one of the Claimants. For the foregoing reason, the claim is denied.
#### § 192.2 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to specify the steps that States must take to avoid the withholding of Federal-aid highway funds for noncompliance with 23 U.S.C. 159.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 99756 / March 18, 2024

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 21868

In the Matter of

VOSB Acquisition Corp. I,

Respondent.

ORDER MAKING FINDINGS AND 

REVOKING REGISTRATION OF 

SECURITIES PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 12(j) OF THE 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 

1934

I.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it necessary and 

appropriate for the protection of investors to accept the Offer of Settlement submitted by VOSB 

Acquisition Corp. I (CIK No. 1927273) (“VOSB Acquisition” or “Respondent”) pursuant to 

Rule 240(a) of the Rules of Practice of the Commission, 17 C.F.R. § 201.240(a), for the purpose 

of settlement of these proceedings initiated against Respondent on February 29, 2024, pursuant 

to Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”).

II.

Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on 

behalf of the Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or 

denying the findings herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over it and the subject 

matter of these proceedings, which are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order 

Making Findings and Revoking Registration of Securities Pursuant to Section 12(j) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as to Respondent (“Order”), as set forth below. 
III.

On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds that1:

1. VOSB Acquisition (CIK No. 1927273) is a a Florida corporation located 

in Ossian, Indiana with a class of securities registered with the Commission under 

Exchange Act Section 12(g). As of February 8, 2024, the common stock of VOSB 

Acquisition was not publically quoted or traded.

2. VOSB Acquisition has failed to comply with Exchange Act Section 13(a)

and Rules 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder because it has not filed any periodic reports with 

the Commission since the period ended July 25, 2022.

IV.

In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it necessary and appropriate for the 

protection of investors to impose the sanction specified in Respondent’s Offer. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Exchange

Act, that registration of each class of the securities of VOSB Acquisition Corp. I (CIK No.: 

1927273) registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act be, and hereby is, revoked. The 

revocation is effective as of March 19, 2024.

2

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary

1 The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondent’s Offer of Settlement and are not binding on any 

other person or entity in this or any other proceeding.

2 This Order applies to all classes of Respondent’s securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange 

Act, whether or not such securities are specifically identified by ticker symbol or otherwise in this Order.
#### § 94.33 Investigation and analysis of claims.

The Director may seek an expert examination of claims submitted if he believes there is a reasonable basis for requesting additional evaluation. The claimant, in submitting an application for reimbursement, authorizes the Director to release information regarding claims or expenses listed in the application to an appropriate body for review. If the Director initiates an expert review, no identifying information for the victim or representative shall be released.
肉禽加工业员工:

预防员工感染 COVID-19 的关键策略

CS 317047-L 06/10/2020

可访问版本:https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/organizations/meat-poultry-processing-workers-employers.html

cdc.gov/coronavirus

雇主应对其工作场所可能传播 COVID-19 的风险因素进行评估。使用预防指南制定一份健康安全计划。经常与州和/或当地

的公共卫生官员和职业安全与健康专家联系,以获取有关您所在地区的 COVID-19 的相关且最新的信息。

• 提倡正确的 手部卫生。提供自来水、

肥皂、纸巾和垃圾桶(如有,非接触

式垃圾桶)。让员工 洗手至少 20 秒。

在多个地点放置洗手站或净手站。

提供至少含有 60% 的酒精浓度的酒精

性洗手液。

• 鼓励生病员工待在家里。制定政策,

从而使患病的员工呆在家里,而不会

失去收入。确保员工了解这些

政策。与职业医疗专家联手,

为可能与 COVID-19 有关的风险

较高的人员制定政策。

• 鼓励员工实施 社交隔离。错开休息时间和到岗和

离岗时间。在员工可能聚集的地方贴示醒目提示

(地板标记和告示),其中包括工作区域、休息

区域、更衣室、走廊或楼道和出入口区域。鼓励

员工避免上下班拼车。如果必须拼车,尽量限制

每辆车的乘客人数。这可能需要使用更多车辆。

鼓励在共享面包车或汽车空间中,佩戴口罩。

• 尽量使员工之间保持至少 6 英尺

距离(鼓励社交隔离)。使用实体

性屏障或分区、减少人员或调整工作

场所或工作流程,进而增加员工之间

的距离。添加额外的上下班打卡站,

将休息室的椅子分隔开,并在室外

添加帐篷用于休息。

• 考虑提供布制口罩和/或面罩。确保

正确佩戴口罩(紧密地遮盖口鼻)。

提供具有多层织物的可洗式口罩。

请在口罩潮湿、脏污、或污染时

更换。口罩不是用来替代建议的或

要求的个人防护装备,例如呼吸器或

医用口罩。培训员工如何在不污染

自己的前提下穿脱个人防护装备。在每个班次使用

后,清洁并消毒面罩。确保面罩能够遮盖住下巴,

并包住脸部两侧。

• 增加清洁与消毒的频率,并确保在

共享空间有足够的通风。至少与员工

更换工作场所一样频繁地清洁并消毒

工具或其他设备。在每个班次结束

时,以至于更加频繁地消毒工作场

所、休息室、巴士或面包车

(如用过)中经常被触碰的表面。

重新定向或移除风扇,以防止空气从一名员工直接

吹向另一名员工。如果风扇已移除,雇主应采取措

施防止 高温导致的危害。

• 对员工和主管进行如何降低

COVID-19 传播的教育。覆盖关于生

病时待在家中,社交距离,佩戴口罩

的方法和适当的 手部卫生等主题。

使用易于理解的形式和适当的语言

提供材料。CDC 提供可下载的

海报。

• 在员工进入工作场所之前,对其进行潜在的

COVID-19 症状筛查。就筛查流程事宜,

向州和当地卫生官员以及职业医疗专业人士

进行咨询。将出现症状的员工立即送回家,

鼓励其在家里进行自我隔离(如可能),

并联系医护人员。提供有关何时可以返岗

的信息。