Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 31 / Friday, February 14, 2014 / Proposed Rules 8903 

input capacity in British thermal units 

per hour (Btu/h). 

(3) Pursuant to § 429.12(b)(13), a 

certification report must include the 

following additional product-specific 

information: 

(i) Whether the basic model is 

engineered-to-order; and 

(ii) For any basic model rated with an 

AEDM, whether the manufacturer elects 

the witness test option for verification 

testing. (See § 429.70(c)(5)(iii) for 

options). However, the manufacturer 

may not select more than 10% of 

AEDM-rated basic models. 

(4) Pursuant to § 429.12(b)(13), a 

certification report may include 

supplemental testing instructions in 

PDF format. A manufacturer may also 

include with a certification report other 

supplementary items in PDF format 

(e.g., manuals) for DOE consideration in 

performing testing under subpart C of 

this part. 

(c) Alternative methods for 

determining efficiency or energy use for 

commercial packaged boilers can be 

found in § 429.70. 

■ 10. Section 429.70 is amended by 

revising the heading of paragraph (c) to 

read as follows: 

§ 429.70 Alternative methods for 

determining energy efficiency and energy 

use. 

* * * * * 

(c) Alternative efficiency 

determination method (AEDM) for 

commercial HVAC (includes 

commercial warm air furnaces and 

commercial packaged boilers), WH, and 

refrigeration equipment— * * * 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2014–03103 Filed 2–13–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

10 CFR Part 431 

[Docket Number EERE–2010–BT–STD– 

0027] 

RIN 1904–AC28 

Energy Conservation Program: Energy 

Conservation Standards for 

Commercial and Industrial Electric 

Motors 

Correction 

In proposed rule document 2013– 

28776 appearing on pages 73589–73681 

in the issue of Friday, December 6, 

2013, make the following corrections: 

1. On page 73594, Table I.5 should 

appear as set forth below: 

TABLE I.5—PROPOSED ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR INTEGRAL BRAKE ELECTRIC MOTORS AND NONINTEGRAL BRAKE ELECTRIC MOTORS (COMPLIANCE STARTING DECEMBER 19, 2015) 

Motor horsepower/standard kilowatt 

equivalent 

Nominal full load efficiency (%) 

4 Pole 6 Pole 8 Pole 

Enclosed Open Enclosed Open Enclosed Open 

1/.75 ......................................................... 85.5 85.5 82.5 82.5 75.5 75.5 

1.5/1.1 ...................................................... 86.5 86.5 87.5 86.5 78.5 77.0 

2/1.5 ......................................................... 86.5 86.5 88.5 87.5 84.0 86.5 

3/2.2 ......................................................... 89.5 89.5 89.5 88.5 85.5 87.5 

5/3.7 ......................................................... 89.5 89.5 89.5 89.5 86.5 88.5 

7.5/5.5 ...................................................... 91.7 91.0 91.0 90.2 86.5 89.5 

10/7.5 ....................................................... 91.7 91.7 91.0 91.7 89.5 90.2 

15/11 ........................................................ 92.4 93.0 91.7 91.7 89.5 90.2 

20/15 ........................................................ 93.0 93.0 91.7 92.4 90.2 91.0 

25/18.5 ..................................................... 93.6 93.6 93.0 93.0 90.2 91.0 

30/22 ........................................................ 93.6 94.1 93.0 93.6 91.7 91.7 

2. On page 73627, Tables IV.10 and 

IV.11 should appear as follows: 

TABLE IV.10—EFFICIENCY LEVELS FOR EQUIPMENT CLASS GROUP 3 

Representative unit 

EL 0 

(EPACT 1992) 

(%) 

EL 1 

(NEMA 

premium) 

(%) 

EL 2 

(Best-inmarket*) 

(%) 

EL 3 

(Max-tech) 

(%) 

5 hp .................................................................................................................. 87.5 89.5 90.2 91.0 

30 hp ................................................................................................................ 92.4 93.6 94.1 94.5 

75 hp ................................................................................................................ 94.1 95.4 95.8 96.2 

TABLE IV.11—EFFICIENCY LEVELS FOR EQUIPMENT CLASS GROUP 2 

Representative unit 

EL 1 

(EPACT 1992) 

(%) 

EL 2 

(NEMA 

premium) 

(%) 

EL 3 

(Max-tech) 

(%) 

5 hp ............................................................................................................................ 87.5 89.5 91.0 

50 hp .......................................................................................................................... 92.4 93.6 94.5 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
8904 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 31 / Friday, February 14, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

3. On page 73634, in Table IV.14, In 

the second row, in the second column 

‘‘1.61’’ Should read ‘‘51.61’’. 

TABLE IV.14—PRODUCT CONVERSION COSTS FOR EFFICIENCY LEVELS ABOVE NEMA PREMIUM

Representative unit 

Per unit adder for 1 

band above NEMA 

premium 

Per unit adder for 2 

bands above NEMA 

premium 

5 HP, Design B ........................................................................................................................ $11.06 $17.36 

30 HP, Design B ...................................................................................................................... $32.89 $51.61 

75 HP, Design B ...................................................................................................................... $66.18 $103.86 

5 HP, Design C ........................................................................................................................ $10.68 $16.75 

50 HP, Design C ...................................................................................................................... $60.59 $95.08 

§ 431.25 [AMENDED] 

4. On page 73679, in § 431.25(d), 

Table 4 should appear as set forth 

below: 

TABLE 4—NOMINAL FULL-LOAD EFFICIENCIES OF NEMA DESIGN B GENERAL PURPOSE ELECTRIC MOTORS (SUBTYPE I 

AND II), EXCEPT FIRE PUMP ELECTRIC MOTORS

Motor horsepower/standard kilowatt equivalent 

Nominal full-load efficiency 

Open motors (number of poles) Enclosed motors (number of poles) 

8 6 4 2 8 6 4 2 

250/186 ............................................................ 94.5 95.4 95.4 94.5 94.5 95.0 95.0 95.4 

300/224 ............................................................ ................ 95.4 95.4 95.0 ................ 95.0 95.4 95.4 

350/261 ............................................................ ................ 95.4 95.4 95.0 ................ 95.0 95.4 95.4 

400/298 ............................................................ ................ ................ 95.4 95.4 ................ ................ 95.4 95.4 

450/336 ............................................................ ................ ................ 95.8 95.8 ................ ................ 95.4 95.4 

500/373 ............................................................ ................ ................ 95.8 95.8 ................ ................ 95.8 95.4 

[FR Doc. C1–2013–28776 Filed 2–13–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 

12 CFR Part 216 

[Docket No. R–1483] 

RIN 7100 AE13 

Privacy of Consumer Information 

(Regulation P) 

AGENCY: Board of Governors of the 

Federal Reserve System. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; 

request for public comment. 

SUMMARY: The Board of Governors of the 

Federal Reserve System (Board) is 

proposing to repeal its Regulation P, 12 

CFR Part 216, which was issued to 

implement section 504 of the GrammLeach-Bliley Act (GLB Act). Title X of 

the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and 

Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank 

Act) transferred rulemaking authority 

for a number of consumer financial 

protection laws from the Board, and six 

other Federal agencies, to the Bureau of 

Consumer Financial Protection 

(Bureau), including rulemaking 

authority for the provisions in Subtitle 

A of Title V of the GLB Act that were 

implemented in the Board’s Regulation 

P. In December 2011, the Bureau 

published an interim final rule 

establishing its own Regulation P to 

implement these provisions of the GLB 

Act (Bureau Interim Final Rule). The 

Bureau’s Regulation P covers those 

entities previously subject to the Board’s 

Regulation P. Accordingly, the Board is 

proposing to repeal its Regulation P. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before April 15, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by Docket No. R–1483, by any 

of the following methods: 

• Agency Web site: http://

www.federalreserve.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments at 

http://www.federalreserve.gov/

generalinfo/foia/ProposedRegs.cfm. 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• E-Mail: regs.comments@

federalreserve.gov. Include the docket 

number in the subject line of the 

message. 

• Fax: (202) 452–3819 or (202) 452– 

3102. 

• Mail: Robert deV. Frierson, 

Secretary, Board of Governors of the 

Federal Reserve System, 20th Street and 

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20551. 

All public comments are available 

from the Board’s Web site at http://

www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/

foia/ProposedRegs.cfm as submitted, 

unless modified for technical reasons. 

Accordingly, your comments will not be 

edited to remove any identifying or 

contact information. Public comments 

may also be viewed electronically or in 

paper form in Room MP–500 of the 

Board’s Martin Building (20th and C 

Streets NW) between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 

p.m. on weekdays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kara 

L. Handzlik, Counsel, Legal Division, at 

(202) 452–3852, Board of Governors of 

the Federal Reserve System, 20th and C 

Streets NW., Washington, DC 20551. For 

users of Telecommunications Device for 

the Deaf (TDD) only, contact (202) 263– 

4869. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS