alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Điều tra Ca nhiễm COVID-19 và Truy dấu Tiếp xúc 

tại Nơi làm việc Phi Chăm sóc sức khỏe:

Nhà sử dụng lao động có thể hỗ trợ Sở Y tế như thế nào

Các sở y tế chịu trách nhiệm chủ trì các cuộc điều tra ca bệnh, truy dấu vết tiếp xúc và điều tra ổ dịch. Khi 

một ca nhiễm COVID-19 được xác định có ảnh hưởng đến nơi làm việc, sở y tế có thể yêu cầu nhà sử dụng 

lao động giúp đỡ. Dưới đây là một số lời khuyên để đảm bảo bạn và nhân viên của bạn sẵn sàng hỗ trợ nếu 

bộ phận y tế liên hệ. 

Bạn có thể tìm thêm thông tin chi tiết và các nguồn lực liên quan đến từng lời khuyên này trong phần 

“Chuẩn bị cộng tác với sở y tế” tại https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/contacttracing-nonhealthcare-workplaces.html

Thành lập điều phối viên hoặc nhóm COVID-19.

Điều phối viên hoặc nhóm COVID-19 đóng vai trò như một nguồn lực cho bộ phận y tế và nơi 

làm việc để giúp phát triển và đưa vào các hoạt động đánh giá mối nguy.

Tạo và thực hiện kế hoạch chuẩn bị, ứng phó và kiểm soát COVID-19.

Sử dụng kế hoạch này để giúp đánh giá nguy cơ lây lan COVID-19 tại nơi làm việc và quyết 

định các hành động để ngăn chặn sự lây lan của của bệnh. 

Chuẩn bị thông tin về nơi làm việc.

Sẵn sàng nhanh chóng cung cấp thông tin và hồ sơ (ví dụ: lịch làm việc, hồ sơ chấm công, sơ 

đồ tòa nhà hoặc sơ đồ mặt bằng) cho bộ phận y tế mà không để lộ hồ sơ nhân sự bí mật.

Tiến hành các hoạt động đánh giá và phòng ngừa mối nguy tại nơi làm việc. 

Thực hiện đánh giá rủi ro phù hợp để xác định khả năng tiếp xúc với COVID-19 và sử dụng 

phân cấp các phương pháp kiểm soát để hạn chế sự lây lan của COVID-19 ở nơi làm việc, chẳng 

hạn như:

• Cách ly mọi người khỏi các mối nguy hiểm (ví dụ: sử dụng tấm ngăn để ngăn cách nhân viên)

• Thay đổi cách mọi người làm việc (ví dụ: bố trí chéo thời gian nghỉ giải lao để giảm bớt sự 

đông đúc)

Giao tiếp với nhân viên. 

Khuyến khích nhân viên thảo luận về các triệu chứng, mức độ phơi nhiễm và người tiếp xúc 

với bộ phận y tế. Nhấn mạnh vai trò của nhân viên, phối hợp với các sở y tế và nhà sử dụng 

lao động, để hạn chế sự lây lan thêm của COVID-19. 

cdc.gov/coronavirus

CS 320280-D 09/30/2020
§ 40.1 Applicability. ( a ) This part applies to all users, owners and operators of the Bulk-Power System within the United States (other than Alaska or Hawaii), including, but not limited to, entities described in section 201(f) of the Federal Power Act.
( b ) Each Reliability Standard made effective by § 40.2 must identify the subset of users, owners and operators of the Bulk-Power System to which a particular Reliability Standard applies.
§ 1300.33 Vouchers and project agreements. ( a ) *General.* Each State shall submit official vouchers for expenses incurred to the Regional Administrator.
( b ) *Content of vouchers.* At a minimum, each voucher shall provide the following information, broken down by individual project agreement: ( 1 ) Project agreement number for which work was performed and payment is sought;
( 2 ) Amount of Federal funds sought, up to the amount identified in § 1300.12(b)(2);
( 3 ) Eligible use of funds;
( 4 ) Amount of Federal funds allocated to local expenditure (provided no less than mid-year (by March 31) and with the final voucher); and
( 5 ) Matching rate (or special matching writeoff used, *i.e.,* sliding scale rate authorized under 23 U.S.C. 120).
( c ) *Project agreements.* Copies of each project agreement for which expenses are being claimed under the voucher (and supporting documentation for the vouchers) shall be made promptly available for review by the Regional Administrator upon request. Each project agreement shall bear the project agreement number to allow the Regional Administrator to match the voucher to the corresponding project.
( d ) *Submission requirements.* At a minimum, vouchers shall be submitted to the Regional Administrator on a quarterly basis, no later than 15 working days after the end of each quarter, except that where a State receives funds by electronic transfer at an annualized rate of one million dollars or more, vouchers shall be submitted on a monthly basis, no later than 15 working days after the end of each month. A final voucher for the fiscal year shall be submitted to the Regional Administrator no later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year, and all unexpended balances shall be carried forward to the next fiscal year unless they have lapsed in accordance with § 1300.41.
( e ) *Payment.* ( 1 ) Failure to provide the information specified in paragraph (b) of this section shall result in rejection of the voucher.
( 2 ) Vouchers that request payment for projects whose project agreement numbers or amounts claimed do not match the projects or exceed the estimated amount of Federal funds provided under § 1300.12(b)(2) shall be rejected, in whole or in part, until an amended project and/or estimated amount of Federal funds is submitted and, if required, approved by the Regional Administrator in accordance with § 1300.32.
( 3 ) Failure to meet the deadlines specified in paragraph (d) of this section may result in delayed payment.
### §459j. Canaveral National Seashore; establishment; boundary; boundary revisions; limitation on area

In order to preserve and protect the outstanding natural, scenic, scientific, ecologic, and historic values of certain lands, shoreline, and waters of the State of Florida, and to provide for public outdoor recreation use and enjoyment of the same, there is hereby established the Canaveral National Seashore (hereinafter referred to as the "seashore"), as generally depicted on the map entitled "Boundary Map, Canaveral National Seashore", dated August 1974 and numbered NS–CAN–40,000A. Such seashore shall comprise approximately sixty-seven thousand five hundred acres within the area more particularly described by a line beginning at the intersection of State Highway 3 and State Road 402, thence generally easterly following State Road 402 to a point one-half mile offshore in the Atlantic Ocean, thence northwesterly along a line which is at each point one-half mile distant from the high water mark to Bethune Beach, thence inland in a generally westerly direction through Turner Flats and Shipyard Canal, thence northwesterly to the Intracoastal Waterway, thence southerly along the Intracoastal Waterway to the boundary of the Kennedy Space Center, thence southwesterly to United States Highway 1, thence southerly along State Highway 3 to the point of beginning. The boundary map shall be on file and available for public inspection in the offices of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and National Park Service, Department of the Interior, Washington, District of Columbia. After advising the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives, in writing, at least sixty days prior to making any boundary revisions, the Secretary may from time to time make minor revisions in the boundaries of the seashore by publication of a revised map or other boundary description in the Federal Register: Provided, That the total acreage included within the boundaries shall not exceed that enumerated in this section.

(Pub. L. 93–626, §1, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2121; Pub. L. 103–437, §6(a)(4), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4583.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–437 substituted "Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives" for "Committees on Interior and Insular Affairs of the United States Congress".
#### § 527.47 Transfer of state prisoners to other countries.

The Bureau of Prisons may assume custody of a state prisoner who has been approved for transfer to a treaty nation for the purpose of facilitating the transfer to the treaty nation. Once the state prisoner has consented to the transfer at the consent verification hearing, the Bureau assumes custody of the prisoner. The state is not required to contract for the placement of the prisoner in federal custody, nor to reimburse the United States for the cost of confinement (as would ordinarily be required by 18 U.S.C. 5003).
JOINT FILING AGREEMENT

         In accordance  with Rule 13d-1(k) under the Securities  Exchange Act of
1934, as amended,  each of the persons named below agrees to the joint filing of
a Statement on Schedule 13D (including  amendments  thereto) with respect to the
common stock of Portland Brewing  Company,  an Oregon  corporation,  and further
agrees  that this  Joint  Filing  Agreement  be  included  as an exhibit to such
filings  provided that, as  contemplated by Section  13d-1(k)(l)(ii),  no person
shall  be  responsible  for the  completeness  or  accuracy  of the  information
concerning the other persons making the filing,  unless such person knows or has
reason to  believe  that such  information  is  inaccurate.  This  Joint  Filing
Agreement may be executed in any number of  counterparts,  all of which together
shall constitute one and the same instrument.



                [Remainder of this page intentionally left blank]


1 - JOINT FILING AGREEMENT

<PAGE>

                                    Signature

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the undersigned have executed this Agreement as of
the 6th day of December 1999.

                                           Harmer Mill & Logging Supply Co.
/s/ R.M. MacTarnahan
------------------------------------
Robert Malcolm MacTarnahan                 By: /s/ R. Scott MacTarnahan
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Robert Scott MacTarnahan, Vice
                                              President
/s/ R. Scott MacTarnahan
------------------------------------
Robert Scott MacTarnahan                   MacTarnahan Family Trust


                                           By: /s/ R.M. MacTarnahan
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Robert M. MacTarnahan, Trustee

MacTarnahan Limited Partnership            Black Lake Investments

By: Harmer Mill & Logging Supply Co.
                                           /s/ R.M. MacTarnahan
    By: /s/ R. Scott MacTarnahan           -------------------------------------
   ---------------------------------       Robert Malcolm MacTarnahan, Partner
   Robert Scott MacTarnahan,
   Vice President
                                           /s/ R. Scott MacTarnahan
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Robert Scott MacTarnahan, Partner
/s/ C.A. Adams
------------------------------------
Charles Anthony Adams

Electra Partners, Inc.                      Charles A. Adams Family Trust

By: /s/ C.A. Adams                          By: /s/ C.A. Adams
   ---------------------------------           ---------------------------------
   Charles Anthony Adams, President            Charles Anthony Adams, Trustee



2 - JOINT FILING AGREEMENT
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 24, 2014

Order 

September 24, 2014

148444(54)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v

RICHARD LEE HARTWICK,

Defendant-Appellant.

SC: 148444

COA: 312308

Oakland CC: 2012-240981-FH

_____________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellee to extend the time to 

file its brief and appendix on appeal is GRANTED. The brief and appendix submitted on

September 12, 2014, are accepted for filing.
#### § 42.715 Burden of proof regarding exceptions.

The burden of proving that an age distinction or other action falls within the exceptions described in § 42.712 and § 42.713 is on the recipient. This allocation of the burden of proof applies in proceedings by the Department to enforce the Act.
#### § 30.3 What programs and activities of the Department are subject to these regulations?

The Attorney General publishes in the Federal Register a list of the Department's programs and activities that are subject to these regulations and identifies which of these are subject to the requirements of section 204 of the Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Development Act.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ADAM LY WIGGINS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 16

- 4075

[ October 17, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,

Martin County ; Lawrence M. Mirman , Judge; L.T. Case No.

432014CF000120CFAXMX

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Virginia Murphy, Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Picard,

Assistan t Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE

, C.J., C ONNER and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### § 636.402 What types of information exchange may take place after the release of the RFP document?

Certain types of information exchange may be desirable at different points after the release of the RFP document. The following table summarizes the types of communications that will be discussed in this subpart. These communication methods are optional.

| Type of information exchange | When | Purpose | Parties involved |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (a) Clarifications | After receipt of proposals | Used when award without discussions is contemplated. Used to clarify certain aspects of a proposal (resolve minor errors, clerical errors, obtain additional past performance information, etc.) | Any offeror whose proposal is not clear to the contracting agency. |
| (b) Communications | After receipt of proposals, prior to the establishment of the competitive range | Used to address issues which might prevent a proposal from being placed in the competitive range | Only those offerors whose exclusion from, or inclusion in, the competitive range is uncertain. All offerors whose past performance information is the determining factor preventing them from being placed in the competitive range. |
| (c) Discussions (see Subpart E of this part) | After receipt of proposals and after the determination of the competitive range | Enhance contracting agency understanding of proposals and offerors understanding of scope of work. Facilitate the evaluation process | Must be held with all offerors in the competitive range. |
#### § 549.93 Definition of “child molestation.”

For purposes of this subpart, “child molestation” includes any unlawful conduct of a sexual nature with, or sexual exploitation of, a person under the age of 18 years.
#### § 710.301 General.

The project development process typically follows a sequence of actions and approvals in order to qualify for funding. The key steps in this process typically are planning, environmental review, project agreement/authorization, acquisition, construction advertising, and construction.
§ 71.4 Investigation. ( a ) If an investigating official concludes that a subpoena pursuant to the authority conferred by 31 U.S.C. 3804(a) is warranted, he may issue a subpoena. ( 1 ) The subpoena so issued shall notify the person to whom it is addressed of the authority under which the subpoena is issued and shall identify the records or documents sought;
( 2 ) The investigating official may designate a person to act on his or her behalf to receive the documents sought; and
( 3 ) The person receiving such subpoena shall be required to tender to the investigating official, or the person designated to receive the documents, a certification that ( i ) The documents sought have been produced;
( ii ) Such documents are not available and the reasons therefor; or
( iii ) Such documents, suitably identified, have been withheld based upon the assertion of an identified privilege.
( b ) If the investigating official concludes that an action under the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act may be warranted, the investigating official shall submit a report containing the findings and conclusions of such investigation to the reviewing official.
( c ) Nothing in this section shall preclude or limit an investigating official's discretion to refer allegations within the Department of Justice for suit under the False Claims Act or other civil relief, or to defer or postpone a report or referral to the reviewing official to avoid interference with a criminal investigation or prosecution.
( d ) Nothing in this section modifies any responsibility of an investigating official to report violations of criminal law to the appropriate component of the Department.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 99821 / March 21, 2024

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-21595

In the Matter of 

NANO WORLD PROJECTS CORP.

ORDER DISMISSING PROCEEDING

On August 31, 2023, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued an Order 

Instituting Proceedings (“OIP”) against Nano World Projects Corp. (“Respondent”) pursuant to 

Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.1 The Commission instituted proceedings 

to determine, among other things, whether it was necessary and appropriate for the protection of 

investors to suspend or revoke Respondent’s securities registration. The OIP was served on 

Respondent on September 5, 2023, but Respondent did not file an answer.

On February 7, 2024, the Commission directed additional briefing, noting that 

Respondent’s securities registration may have been revoked in a prior Commission proceeding

under Exchange Act Section 12(j).

2 The order directed the parties to file additional written 

submissions addressing whether there is any registration or class of registered securities that can 

be revoked in this matter, and if not, whether any remedy is available to the Commission or 

whether this proceeding should be dismissed. 

On February 9, 2024, the Division of Enforcement filed a motion to dismiss this 

proceeding. The Division represented that Respondent’s securities registration had been revoked 

in a prior Commission proceeding and stated that it was therefore appropriate to dismiss the

present proceeding. Respondent did not respond to the Commission’s order directing additional 

1 Nano World Projects Corp., Exchange Act Release No. 98255, 2023 WL 5624272 

(Aug. 31, 2023).

2 Nano World Projects Corp., Exchange Act Release No. 99486, 2024 WL 473708 

(Feb. 7, 2024).
2

briefing or to the Division’s motion to dismiss. Under the circumstances, it appears appropriate 

to dismiss the proceeding.

3

 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this proceeding is dismissed.

By the Commission.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary

3 See, e.g., Ameritek Ventures, Inc., Exchange Act Release No. 93076, 2021 WL 4291677 

(Sept. 20, 2021) (dismissing Section 12(j) proceeding against respondent that no longer had a 

class of securities registered under Section 12); Swissinso Holding, Inc., Exchange Act Release 

No. 90516, 2020 WL 6891408 (Nov. 24, 2020) (same).
EXHIBIT 32.2





Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Teliphone Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10–Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George Metrakos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ George MetrakosGeorge Metrakos

Principal Financial and Accounting Officer





Dated: August 16, 2010
#### § 1.3 Federal-State cooperation; authority of State highway departments.

The Administrator shall cooperate with the States, through their respective State highway departments, in the construction of Federal-aid highways. Each State highway department, maintained in conformity with 23 U.S.C. 302, shall be authorized, by the laws of the State, to make final decisions for the State in all matters relating to, and to enter into, on behalf of the State, all contracts and agreements for projects and to take such other actions on behalf of the State as may be necessary to comply with the Federal laws and the regulations in this part.
§ 54.545 Pre-employment inquiries. ( a ) *Marital status.* A recipient shall not make pre-employment inquiry as to the marital status of an applicant for employment, including whether such applicant is “Miss” or “Mrs.”
( b ) *Sex.* A recipient may make pre-employment inquiry as to the sex of an applicant for employment, but only if such inquiry is made equally of such applicants of both sexes and if the results of such inquiry are not used in connection with discrimination prohibited by these Title IX regulations.
§ 630.705 Procedures. ( a ) An advance construction project shall meet the same requirements and be processed in the same manner as a regular Federal-aid project, except, ( 1 ) The FHWA authorization does not constitute any commitment of Federal funds on the project, and
( 2 ) The FHWA shall not reimburse the State until the project is converted under § 630.709.
( b ) Project numbers shall be identified by the letters “AC” preceding the regular project number prefix.
[60 FR 36993, July 19, 1995, as amended at 68 FR 60033, Oct. 21, 2003]
#### § 630.802 Applicability.

A proposed bridge over a dam, together with the approach roads to connect the bridge with existing public highways, must be eligible for inclusion in the Federal-aid highway system, if not already a part thereof.
### §4304. Confidentiality of information concerning nature and location of significant caves

#### (a) In general

Information concerning the specific location of any significant cave may not be made available to the public under section 552 of title 5 unless the Secretary determines that disclosure of such information would further the purposes of this chapter and would not create a substantial risk of harm, theft, or destruction of such cave.

#### (b) Exceptions

Notwithstanding subsection (a), the Secretary may make available information regarding significant caves upon the written request by Federal and State governmental agencies or bona fide educational and research institutions. Any such written request shall, at a minimum—

(1) describe the specific site or area for which information is sought;

(2) explain the purpose for which such information is sought; and

(3) include assurances satisfactory to the Secretary that adequate measures are being taken to protect the confidentiality of such information and to ensure the protection of the significant cave from destruction by vandalism and unauthorized use.

(Pub. L. 100–691, §5, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4548.)