alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 97818 / June 29, 2023

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-17582

In the Matter of

Weatherford International PLC, f/k/a 

Weatherford International LTD., 

James Hudgins, CPA, and Darryl 

Kitay, CPA

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO 

ENTER AN ORDER APPROVING OR 

DISAPPROVING PLAN OF 

DISTRIBUTION

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-17628

In the Matter of

Ernst & Young LLP, Craig R. 

Fronckiewicz, CPA, and Sarah E. 

Adams, CPA

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

On November 17, 2022, pursuant to Rule 1103 of the United States Securities and 

Exchange Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans (the “Commission’s 

Rules”), 17 C.F.R.§ 201.1103, the Commission published a Notice of Proposed Plan of 

Distribution and Opportunity to Comment (“Notice”)1for the distribution of monies placed into 

a Fair Fund in the above-captioned matters. The Notice invited public comment on the proposed 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 96340 (Nov. 17, 2022).
2

plan of distribution (“Plan”) through December 19, 2022, and the Commission received three 

public comments that raised various issues (the “Comments”).

Rule 1104 of the Commission’s Rules, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1104, provides in relevant part, 

“[t]he order approving or disapproving the plan should be entered within 30 days after the end of 

the final period allowed for comments on the proposed plan unless the Commission or the 

hearing officer, by written order, allows a longer period for good cause shown.”

On January 18, 2023, the Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority, issued an order 

extending the time to enter an order approving or disapproving the Plan until June 30, 2023.

2

The Division states additional time is needed to present its recommendation to the 

Commission regarding the Comments and the Plan, and therefore, good cause has been shown to 

enter an order extending time to approve or disapprove the Plan until September 29, 2023. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 1104 of the Commission’s Rules,3

for good cause shown, the time for entering an order approving or disapproving the Plan is 

extended to September 29, 2023.

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman 

Secretary

2

 See Order Extending Time to Enter Order Approving or Disapproving Plan of Distribution, Exchange Act Rel. 

96687 (Jan. 18, 2023).

3

 17 C.F.R. § 201.1104.
#### § 51.3 Delegation of authority.

The responsibility and authority for determinations under section 5 and section 3(c) have been delegated by the Attorney General to the Assistant Attorney General, Civil Rights Division. With the exception of objections and decisions following the reconsideration of objections, the Chief of the Voting Section is authorized to perform the functions of the Assistant Attorney General. With the concurrence of the Assistant Attorney General, the Chief of the Voting Section may designate supervisory attorneys in the Voting Section to perform the functions of the Chief.

[Order No. 3262-2011, 76 FR 21243, Apr. 15, 2011]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0154

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

TYLER GHARRETT WILKINSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including November 2, 2020, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 23 2020

09/23/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0154
Corgenix Medical Corporation
                      Computation of Net Income Per Share

                                             Three Month Ended
                                               September 30,
                                             1999         1998
                                             ------------------

Net profit (loss)                     $     40,604   $  (327,424)

Common shares of outstanding at
beginning of period                     16,852,116    12,102,494

    Effect of shares issued during
    the period                              14,229        54,097

Basic and diluted weighted average
common shares                           16,866,345    12,156,591

    Basic and diluted profit (loss)
    per share                         $       0.01         (0.03)
IT’S NOT TOO LATE TO GET 

YOUR FAMILY VACCINATED!

Vaccinate your family this flu season. 

It’s the best way to fight flu. 

A yearly flu vaccine is recommended for everyone 6 

months and older.

Vaccination is especially important for protecting people 

at high risk of serious flu complications, including:

• young children

• pregnant women

• adults 65 years and older

• anyone with chronic health conditions like 

asthma, diabetes, or heart disease. 

National Influenza Vaccination Week (NIVW)

December 1-7, 2019

www.cdc.gov/flu/nivw

CS272264
Editorial Note on Part 635
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 635 appear at 67 FR 75924, Dec. 10, 2002.

§ 635.413 Guaranty and warranty clauses. The State DOT may include warranty provisions in National Highway System (NHS) construction contracts in accordance with the following: ( a ) Warranty provisions shall be for a specific construction product or feature. Items of maintenance not eligible for Federal participation shall not be covered.
( b ) All warranty requirements and subsequent revisions shall be submitted to the Division Administrator for advance approval.
( c ) No warranty requirement shall be approved which, in the judgment of the Division Administrator, may place an undue obligation on the contractor for items over which the contractor has no control.
( d ) A State DOT may follow its own procedures regarding the inclusion of warranty provisions in non-NHS Federal-aid contracts.
( e ) In the case of a design-build project, the following requirements will apply instead of paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section. ( 1 ) General project warranties may be used on NHS projects, provided: ( i ) The term of the warranty is short (generally one to two years); however, projects developed under a public-private agreement may include warranties that are appropriate for the term of the contract or agreement.
( ii ) The warranty is not the sole means of acceptance;
( iii ) The warranty must not include items of routine maintenance which are not eligible for Federal participation; and,
( iv ) The warranty may include the quality of workmanship, materials and other specific tasks identified in the contract.
( 2 ) Performance warranties for specific products on NHS projects may be used at the State DOT's discretion. If performance warranties are used, detailed performance criteria must be provided in the Request for Proposal document.
( 3 ) The State DOT may follow its own procedures regarding the inclusion of warranty provisions on non-NHS Federal-aid design-build contracts.
( 4 ) For best value selections, the State DOT may allow proposers to submit alternate warranty proposals that improve upon the warranty terms in the RFP document. Such alternate warranty proposals must be in addition to the base proposal that responds to the RFP requirements.
[60 FR 44274, Aug. 25, 1995, as amended at 67 FR 75926, Dec. 10, 2002; 72 FR 45336, Aug. 14, 2007]
ho hoaëc nhaûy muõi vaøo

phía treân cuûa tay aùo,

ñöøng ho hoaëc nhaûy

muõi vaøo baøn tay.

Haõy duøng giaáy lau

tay che mieäng vaø

muõi khi ho hoaëc

nhaûy muõi

Boû giaáy ñaõ duøng

vaøo gioû raùc.

hoaëc

khi ho hoaëc nhaûy muõi.

röûa saïch baèng

thuoác röûa tay

coù chöùa coàn.

Röûa tay baèng

nöôùc vaø xaø

phoøng

hoaëc

Minnesota Department of Health

717 SE Delaware Street

Minneapolis, MN 55414

612-676-5414 or 1-877-676-5414

www.health.state.mn.us

Minnesota

Antibiotic 

Resistance 

Collaborative

Che

hokhi

Haõy chaën ñöùng söï laây lan cuûa caùc loaïi vi truøng khieán quí vò vaø ngöôøi khaùc bò beänh!

Röûa

sau

tay
Exhibit 99.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of the issuer Gyrodyne Company of America,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending April 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Stephen V. Maroney, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: July 21, 2003


                                          /S/ Stephen V. Maroney
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Stephen V. Maroney,
                                          President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                          Chief Financial Officer
§ 21.6 Proceedings *in forma pauperis.* Title 28 U.S.C. 1915 provides for the commencement, prosecution or defense of any suit, action, or proceeding without prepayment of fees and costs. Witnesses shall attend as in other cases. ( a ) *Civil cases.* There are currently no provisions for payment of witnesses called by the indigent. If the indigent party prevails, witness fees and expenses may be taxed as costs in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1920.
( b ) *Criminal cases.* Rule 17(b), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, requires that fact witnesses *subpoenaed* on behalf of an indigent defendant be paid in the same manner as witnesses called on behalf of the Government. The attendance must be certified by the presiding officer of the court. The expenses of Federal Government employees are treated in the same manner as they are treated when the employee is called by a Government attorney.
§ 552.31 Negotiations. The Warden is not ordinarily involved directly in the negotiation process. Instead, this responsibility is ordinarily assigned to a team of individuals specifically trained in hostage negotiation techniques. ( a ) Negotiators have no decision-making authority in hostage situations, but rather serve as intermediaries between hostage takers and command center staff.
( b ) During the negotiation process, the following items are non-negotiable: release of captors from custody, providing of weapons, exchange of hostages, and immunity from prosecution.
### §3126. Closure to subsistence uses

#### (a) National parks and park monuments in Alaska; authorization of subsistence uses and sport fishing

All national parks and park monuments in Alaska shall be closed to the taking of wildlife except for subsistence uses to the extent specifically permitted by this Act. Subsistence uses and sport fishing shall be authorized in such areas by the Secretary and carried out in accordance with the requirements of this subchapter and other applicable laws of the United States and the State of Alaska.

#### (b) Closure for public safety, administration, or the continued viability of fish and wildlife population

Except as specifically provided otherwise by this section, nothing in this subchapter is intended to enlarge or diminish the authority of the Secretary to designate areas where, and establish periods when, no taking of fish and wildlife shall be permitted on the public lands for reasons of public safety, administration, or to assure the continued viability of a particular fish or wildlife population. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act or other law, the Secretary, after consultation with the State and adequate notice and public hearing, may temporarily close any public lands (including those within any conservation system unit), or any portion thereof, to subsistence uses of a particular fish or wildlife population only if necessary for reasons of public safety, administration, or to assure the continued viability of such population. If the Secretary determines that an emergency situation exists and that extraordinary measures must be taken for public safety or to assure the continued viability of a particular fish or wildlife population, the Secretary may immediately close the public lands, or any portion thereof, to the subsistence uses of such population and shall publish the reasons justifying the closure in the Federal Register. Such emergency closure shall be effective when made, shall not extend for a period exceeding sixty days, and may not subsequently be extended unless the Secretary affirmatively establishes, after notice and public hearing, that such closure should be extended.

(Pub. L. 96–487, title VIII, §816, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2430.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 96–487, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2371, known as the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3101 of this title and Tables.
Editorial Note on Part 635
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 635 appear at 67 FR 75924, Dec. 10, 2002.

§ 635.105 Supervising agency. ( a ) The State DOT has responsibility for the construction of all Federal-aid projects, and is not relieved of such responsibility by authorizing performance of the work by a local public agency or other Federal agency. The State DOT shall be responsible for insuring that such projects receive adequate supervision and inspection to insure that projects are completed in conformance with approved plans and specifications.
( b ) Although the State DOT may employ a consultant to provide construction engineering services, such as inspection or survey work on a project, the State DOT shall provide a full-time employed State engineer to be in responsible charge of the project.
( c ) When a project is located on a street or highway over which the State DOT does not have legal jurisdiction, or when special conditions warrant, the State DOT, while not relieved of overall project responsibility, may arrange for the local public agency having jurisdiction over such street or highway to perform the work with its own forces or by contract; provided the following conditions are met and the Division Administrator approves the arrangements in advance. ( 1 ) In the case of force account work, there is full compliance with subpart B of this part.
( 2 ) When the work is to be performed under a contract awarded by a local public agency, all Federal requirements including those prescribed in this subpart shall be met.
( 3 ) The local public agency is adequately staffed and suitably equipped to undertake and satisfactorily complete the work; and
( 4 ) In those instances where a local public agency elects to use consultants for construction engineering services, the local public agency shall provide a full-time employee of the agency to be in responsible charge of the project.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Document Search 
-  Minnesota 2023 Annual Report 

# Minnesota 2023 Annual Report

## About this document and download

  Download  .pdf

**Owned by**
#### § 65.53 Confidentiality of information.

Section 812 of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (as amended and implemented by 28 CFR part 20) shall apply with respect to information, including criminal history information and criminal intelligence systems operating with the support of Federal law enforcement assistance.
### §460k–3. Charges and fees; permits; regulations; penalties; enforcement

The Secretary may establish reasonable charges and fees and issue permits for public use of national wildlife refuges, game ranges, national fish hatcheries, and other conservation areas administered by the Department of the Interior for fish and wildlife purposes. The Secretary may issue regulations to carry out the purposes of this subchapter. A violation of such regulations shall be a misdemeanor with maximum penalties of imprisonment for not more than six months, or a fine of not more than $500, or both. The provisions of this subchapter and any such regulation shall be enforced by any officer or employee of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service designated by the Secretary of the Interior.

(Pub. L. 87–714, §4, Sept. 28, 1962, 76 Stat. 654; Pub. L. 95–616, §3(e), Nov. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 3111; Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §221, Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2028.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–473 substituted "misdemeanor" for "petty offense (18 U.S.C. 1)".

1978—Pub. L. 95–616 provided for designation of enforcement personnel.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–473 effective Nov. 1, 1987, and applicable only to offenses committed after the taking effect of such amendment, see section 235(a)(1) of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3551 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.
§ 93.4 Grant authority. ( a ) The Assistant Attorney General may make grants to States, State courts, local courts, units of local government, and Indian tribal governments, acting directly or through agreements with other public or private entities, for programs that involve: ( 1 ) Continuing judicial supervision over offenders with substance abuse problems who are not violent offenders, and
( 2 ) The integrated administration of other sanctions and services, which shall include— ( i ) Mandatory periodic testing for the use of controlled substances or other addictive substances during any period of supervised release or probation for each participant;
( ii ) Substance abuse treatment for each participant;
( iii ) Diversion, probation, or other supervised release involving the possibility of prosecution, confinement, or incarceration based on noncompliance with program requirements or failure to show satisfactory progress; and
( iv ) Programmatic, offender management, and aftercare services such as relapse prevention, health care, education, vocational training, job placement, housing placement, and child care or other family support services for each participant who requires such services.
( b ) Applications for grants under this program shall be made at such times and in such form as may be specified in guidelines or notices published by the Assistant Attorney General. Applications will be evaluated according to the statutory requirements of the Act and the programmatic goals specified in the applicable guidelines. Grantees must comply with all statutory and program requirements applicable to grants under this program.
( c ) The funds provided under this part shall be administered in compliance with the standards set forth in part 38 (Equal Treatment for Faith-based Organizations) of this chapter.
[60 FR 32105, June 20, 1995, as amended by Order No. 2703-2004, 69 FR 2841, Jan. 21, 2004]
§ 552.22 Principles governing the use of force and application of restraints. ( a ) Staff ordinarily shall first attempt to gain the inmate's voluntary cooperation before using force.
( b ) Force may not be used to punish an inmate.
( c ) Staff shall use only that amount of force necessary to gain control of the inmate. Situations when an appropriate amount of force may be warranted include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Defense or protection of self or others;
( 2 ) Enforcement of institutional regulations; and
( 3 ) The prevention of a crime or apprehension of one who has committed a crime.
( d ) Where immediate use of restraints is indicated, staff may temporarily apply such restraints to an inmate to prevent that inmate from hurting self, staff, or others, and/or to prevent serious property damage. When the temporary application of restraints is determined necessary, and after staff have gained control of the inmate, the Warden or designee is to be notified immediately for a decision on whether the use of restraints should continue.
( e ) Staff may apply restraints (for example, handcuffs) to the inmate who continues to resist after staff achieve physical control of that inmate, and may apply restraints to any inmate who is placed under control by the Use of Force Team Technique. If an inmate in a forcible restraint situation refuses to move to another area on his own, staff may physically move that inmate by lifting and carrying the inmate to the appropriate destination.
( f ) Restraints should remain on the inmate until self-control is regained.
( g ) Except when the immediate use of restraints is required for control of the inmate, staff may apply restraints to, or continue the use of progressive restraints on, an inmate while in a cell in administrative detention or disciplinary segregation only with approval of the Warden or designee.
( h ) Restraint equipment or devices (e.g., handcuffs) may not be used in any of the following ways: ( 1 ) As a method of punishing an inmate.
( 2 ) About an inmate's neck or face, or in any manner which restricts blood circulation or obstructs the inmate's airways.
( 3 ) In a manner that causes unnecessary physical pain or extreme discomfort.
( 4 ) To secure an inmate to a fixed object, such as a cell door or cell grill, except as provided in § 552.24.
( i ) Medication may not be used as a restraint solely for security purposes.
( j ) All incidents involving the use of force and the application of restraints (as specified in § 552.27) must be carefully documented.
[54 FR 21394, May 17, 1989. Redesignated and amended at 59 FR 30469, 30470, June 13, 1994; 61 FR 39800, July 30, 1996]
Red MENDOZA, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BORDEN, INC., d.b.a. Borden's Dairy, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 97-5121.

United States Court of Appeals,

Eleventh Circuit.

March 19, 1999

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (No. 96-1082-CV-LCN),

Lenore C. Nesbitt, Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion October

28, 1998, 11th Cir., 158 F.3d 1171).

Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA,

BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en

banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing

en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's

opinion is hereby VACATED.
### §40c. Creation of special fund; expenditure

For the purposes of sections 40a and 40b of this title, the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to maintain hereafter in a special fund a sufficient portion of the park revenues, based upon estimates to be submitted by the Secretary of the Interior, and to expend the same upon certification by the Secretary of the Interior.

(June 4, 1948, ch. 417, §3, 62 Stat. 339.)
#### Harry C. Schlappendorf, Respondent, v. American Railway Traffic Company, Appellant.

Motion to resettle order granted. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ.