alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 93005 / September 15, 2021

ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT

Release No. 4251 / September 15, 2021

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-18347

IN THE MATTER OF 

BRIAN SWEET, CPA

NOTICE THAT INITIAL DECISION HAS BECOME FINAL

The time for filing a petition for review of the initial decision in this proceeding has 

expired. No such petition has been filed by Brian Sweet, CPA, or the Division of Enforcement, 

and the Commission has not chosen to review the decision on its own initiative.

Accordingly, notice is hereby given, pursuant to Rule 360(d) of the Commission's Rules 

of Practice,1that the initial decision of the administrative law judge has become the final 

decision of the Commission with respect to Brian Sweet, CPA.

2 The order contained in that 

decision is hereby declared effective. The initial decision ordered that the additional proceedings 

ordered by the order instituting proceedings in this proceeding be dismissed.

For the Commission, by the Office of the General Counsel, pursuant to delegated 

authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

 Secretary

 

1

 17 C.F.R. § 201.360(d).

2

 Brian Sweet, CPA, Initial Decision Release No. 1409, 2021 WL 3501213 (Aug. 2, 2021).
### §450oo–6. Traversing privileges; regulations

Recognized members of the Minnesota Chippewa Tribe shall not be denied the privilege of traversing the area included within the Grand Portage National Monument for the purposes of logging their land, fishing, or boating, or as a means of access to their homes, businesses, or other areas of use and they shall have the right to traverse such area in pursuit of their traditional rights to hunt and trap outside the monument: Provided, That, in order to preserve and interpret the historic features and attractions within the monument, the Secretary may prescribe reasonable regulations under which the monument may be traversed.

(Pub. L. 85–910, §7, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1753.)
**EXHIBIT 32**
 
 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350 AS ADOPTED**
 **PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Aviation General, Incorporated and Subsidiaries (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned President and Principal Accounting and Financial Officer of the Company each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   
 ****Date: October 1, 2004
By:
/s/ Wirt D. Walker IIIWirt D. Walker IIIDirector, Chairman of the Board,and Chief Executive Officer,President and Treasurer
 
 
 
 ****By:
/s/ Glenn A. JacksonGlenn A. JacksonChief Financial Officer
§ 706.303 Gifts, entertainment, and favors. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section a special Government employee, while so employed or in connection with his employment, shall not receive or solicit from a person having business with the Council anything of value as a gift, gratuity, loan, entertainment, or favor for himself or another person, particularly one with whom he has family, business, or financial ties.
( b ) The exceptions from the restrictions as set forth in § 706.202(b) for employees apply in the same manner to special Government employees.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Angelo Gandolfo, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
### §460lll–61. Authorization of appropriations

#### (a) Agriculture

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Agriculture such sums as are necessary to—

(1) permit the Secretary to exercise administrative jurisdiction over the Recreation Area under this subchapter; and

(2) administer the Recreation Area as a unit of the National Forest System.

#### (b) Interior

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of the Interior such sums as are necessary to carry out activities within the Recreation Area.

#### (c) Use of funds

#### (1) In general

Except as provided in paragraph (2), the Secretary of Agriculture may expend amounts appropriated to carry out this subchapter in a manner consistent with the authorities exercised by the Tennessee Valley Authority before the transfer of the Recreation Area to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of Agriculture, including campground management and visitor services, paid advertisement, and procurement of food and supplies for resale purposes.

#### (2) Exception

The Secretary of Agriculture shall not use amounts appropriated to carry out this subchapter for an activity described in section 460lll–24(b) of this title.

(Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(e) [title V, §551], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–231, 2681–326; Pub. L. 106–291, title II, Oct. 11, 2000, 114 Stat. 974; Pub. L. 107–63, title III, §335, Nov. 5, 2001, 115 Stat. 472; Pub. L. 108–108, title III, §334, Nov. 10, 2003, 117 Stat. 1312; Pub. L. 117–328, div. DD, title II, §201(i), Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5584.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 117–328, §201(i)(1), substituted "Recreation Area" for "Recreation Area area".

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 117–328, §201(i)(2), added subsec. (c) and struck out former subsec. (c). Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "The Secretary of Agriculture may expend amounts appropriated or otherwise made available to carry out this subchapter in a manner consistent with the authorities exercised by the Tennessee Valley Authority before the transfer of the Recreation Area to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary, including campground management and visitor services, paid advertisement, and procurement of food and supplies for resale purposes."

2003—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 108–108 amended heading and text of subsec. (c) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "Until September 30, 2004, the Secretary of Agriculture may expend amounts appropriated or otherwise made available to carry out this subchapter in a manner consistent with the authorities exercised by the Tennessee Valley Authority, before the transfer of the Recreation Area to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary, regarding procurement of property, services, supplies, and equipment."

2001—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 107–63 substituted "2004" for "2002".

2000—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 106–291 added subsec. (c).
### §251m. Authorization of appropriations

There is hereby authorized to be appropriated not to exceed $23,700,000 for the acquisition of lands, privately owned aquatic lands, or interests therein in accordance with the provisions of sections 251e to 251m of this title. No funds authorized to be appropriated pursuant to sections 251e to 251m of this title shall be available prior to October 1, 1977.

(Pub. L. 94–578, title III, §320(j), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2741; Pub. L. 96–199, title I, §110, Mar. 5, 1980, 94 Stat. 70.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 251e to 251m of this title, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title III of Pub. L. 94–578.

#### Amendments

1980—Pub. L. 96–199 substituted "$23,700,000" for "$13,000,000".
### §470w–4. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 89–665, title III, §305, as added Pub. L. 96–515, title V, §501, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 3002, related to attorneys' fees and costs to prevailing parties in civil actions. See section 307105 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements of The Smithfield Companies,
Inc. for the six months ended September 30, 1998, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       6,037,886
<SECURITIES>                                   495,840
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,722,927
<ALLOWANCES>                                    63,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,765,347
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,728,363
<PP&E>                                       7,342,991
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,387,934
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,767,988
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,672,397
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,503,767
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,591,824
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,767,988
<SALES>                                      9,908,573
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,950,528
<CGS>                                        6,595,003
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,146,388
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                929,527
<INCOME-TAX>                                   292,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            637,527
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   637,527
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27
        

</TABLE>
Compliance Outreach Program 

for Municipal Advisors

The Registration Process

November 10, 2016

Welcome (3:00 pm – 3:05 pm) 

 Ritta McLaughlin, Chief Education Officer, MSRB

Section1: Registration Requirements for the SEC (3:05 pm – 3:30 pm)

Staff from the SEC’s Office of Municipal Securities will discuss municipal advisor’s initial and ongoing

registration obligations under the SEC municipal advisor registration rule. Topicsthat will be covered 

include initial registration, annual updates and amendments to registration, and withdrawal from 

registration.

Ahmed Abonamah,Attorney-Advisor, Office of Municipal Securities, SEC

Section 2:Registration Requirements for the MSRB (3:30 pm– 4:00 pm)

Panelists, consisting of MSRB Staff, will discuss the obligations of municipal advisorsrelating to 

registration with the MSRB. Staff will review,in detail, the MSRB registration process as well as current 

ongoing registration obligations that municipal advisors have under the MSRB rules.

 Gail Marshall, Associate General Counsel-Enforcement Coordination,MSRB

 Ritta McLaughlin, Chief Education Officer, MSRB

Section 3:SEC and FINRA Examination Findings Relating to MSRB Registration Rules (4:00 pm–

4:15 pm)

SEC and FINRA Examination Staff will discuss common registration deficiencies. 

Robert Miller, Supervisory Attorney/Examination Manager, OCIE, SEC

Bonnie Bowes, Associate Director, Fixed Income Regulation, FINRA

Q & A (4:15 pm – 4:30 pm)

Closing Remarks

Suzanne McGovern, Assistant Director, OCIE, SEC
## Breadcrumb

-  Inicio 
-  National Small Business Week 

Parte o todo el contenido en esta página disponible solo en inglés.

# National Small Business Week

National Small Business Week (NSBW) is April 28 - May 4. SBA and SCORE will co-host the NSBW Virtual Summit April 30 - May 1.

                Register for the free Virtual Summit              

## About National Small Business Week

For more than 60 years, the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) has celebrated National Small Business Week, which acknowledges the critical contributions of America’s entrepreneurs and small business owners. This year, National Small Business Week takes place April 28 - May 4, 2024, and is when SBA officially recognizes their hard work, ingenuity, and dedication, including their contributions to the economy. This year’s activities include in-person events and an educational virtual summit on a variety of business topics. 

-  Virtual summit              Meet other business owners and get expert advice at this free 2-day summit.                  Learn about the virtual summit 
-  Awards              Look through our 2024 National Small Business Week award winners.                  View this year's award winners 
-  Media              Review news articles and press releases about National Small Business Week.                  Access media 
-  Years past              Explore video highlights from previous National Small Business Week events.                  Discover highlights from years past 

## Contact us

SBA’s participation in this cosponsored activity is not an endorsement of the views, opinions, products, or services of any cosponsor or other person or entity. All SBA programs and services are extended to the public on a nondiscriminatory basis. Reasonable arrangements for persons with disabilities will be made if requested at least two weeks in advance. Contact us by email at smallbusinessweek@sba.gov.
### §460l–10b. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 88–578, title I, §10, formerly §9, as added Pub. L. 90–401, §4, July 15, 1968, 82 Stat. 355; renumbered §10, Pub. L. 92–347, §2, July 11, 1972, 86 Stat. 459, related to contracts for options to acquire lands and waters in national park system. See section 200309 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.

A prior section 10 of Pub. L. 88–578 was renumbered section 11 and was classified to section 460l–10c of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 113–287.
### §410nnn–5. Management plan

Within 3 years after June 23, 1992, the Secretary shall develop and transmit to the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs of the United States House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate, a general management plan for the historical park. The plan shall be consistent with section 100502 of title 54 and with the purposes of this subchapter and shall include (but not be limited to) each of the following:

(1) A resource protection program including land acquisition needs.

(2) A general visitor use and interpretive program.

(3) A general development plan including such roads, trails, markers, structures, and other improvements and facilities as may be necessary for the accommodation of visitor use in accordance with the purposes of this subchapter and the need to preserve the integrity of the historical park.

(4) A research plan.

(5) Identification of appropriate cooperative agreements as identified in section 410nnn–4 of this title.

(Pub. L. 102–304, §7, June 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 257; Pub. L. 111–11, title VII, §7113(a)(3)(C), Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1202.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

In introductory provisions, "section 100502 of title 54" substituted for "section 12 of the Act of August 18, 1970 (16 U.S.C. 1a–7)" on authority of Pub. L. 113–287, §6(e), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272, which Act enacted Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.

#### Amendments

2009—Pub. L. 111–11 substituted "historical park" for "historic site" in introductory provisions and in par. (3).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs of the House of Representatives changed to Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives on Jan. 5, 1993, by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Third Congress.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

January 18, 2013

p0116

Order 

January 18, 2013

145873

ARTHUR LOUIS PARKS, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 145873

COA: 306974

Wayne CC: 11-010819-AH

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

PAROLE BOARD, and JOHN 

PIGGOTT,

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 7, 2012 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the order denying the plaintiff’s complaint for 

habeas corpus. The Department of Corrections does not have authority to rescind a final 

order of discharge from parole once it is delivered to the parolee. People v Holder, 483 

Mich 168 (2009). According to its own internal operating procedures, it is the 

responsibility of the Department of Corrections to accurately determine credit prior to 

delivering a parole discharge. We REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for 

reconsideration of the defendant’s complaint for habeas corpus consistent with this order.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

HATHAWAY, J., not participating.
(54 South. 788.)

No. 18,300.

#### COLLINS v. DALTON CLARK STAVE CO., Inc.

(March 27, 1911.)

*(Syllabus by the Court.)*

Action (§ 52*) — Joinder oe Actions — Action eor Possession and eor Cutting Timber. .

A possessory action and an action for damages for cutting and removing timber from the premises may be cumulated in the same petition. Mott v. Hopper, 116 La. 629, 40 South. 921, reaffirmed.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Action, Dec. Dig. § 52.*]

Appeal from Fifth Judicial District Court, Parish of Winn; George Wear, Judge.

Action by James S. Collins against the Dalton Clark Stave Company, Incorporated. From a judgment of dismissal, plaintiff appeals.

Reversed.

Mathews & Gamble, for. appellant. Gris-ham & Oglesby, for appellee.

LAND, J.

This is a possessory action, coupled with a demand for damages for the *251alleged illegal cutting and removal of timber from the premises. The petition alleged that plaintiff had the real and actual possession of the land as owner for more than one year prior to the said disturbance of his possession by the defendant.

Defendant excepted that the petition contained inconsistent demands, and moved the court to order that the plaintiff elect whether he will proceed with his possessory action or his action for trespass. The exception was sustained, and, on the plaintiff declining to elect, there was judgment dismissing plaintiff’s suit as in case of nonsuit. Plaintiff has appealed.

The judgment below rests on the proposition that plaintiff, in order to recover the value of the timber cut and removed, must establish his ownership of the timber, and cannot do so without first establishing his ownership of the land. The deduction drawn from the premises is that the action for the value of the timber, being petitory, cannot be cumulated with the possessory action.

In a similar case this court said:

> “The question of the right of the plaintiff to recover damages presents no difficulty. Relator argues that the solution of this question depends on that of ownership, which cannot be determined in this action.

> “The answer is that in actions of trespass there can be no examination of title, and that actual 'possession, if legal and peaceable, is sufficient to maintain the action. 2 Hennsn’s Digest, p. 1057, No. 4. In Nicol v. Railroad Co., 44 La. Ann. 816, 11 South. 34, this court held that, even as against the lawful owner, the possessor of immovable property must be protected against the unlawful disturbance of his possession, and affirmed a judgment against the defendant therein for damages.”

See Mott v. Hopper et al., 116 La. 629, 40 South. 921.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment below be reversed, and it is now ordered that the exception and motion filed by defendant be overruled, and that this cause be remanded for further proceedings according to law, and that the defendant pay the costs of appeal.
#### D. Sterrett Pindell, Appellant, v. Rockwood Holding Corporation et al., Defendants, and Jefferson Title and Mortgage Corporation, Defendant-Respondent.

(Appeal No. 1.)

No opinion. Carswell, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.32
                                       
              HILTON HOTELS EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

                                AMENDMENT 1997-1



          WHEREAS, Hilton Hotels Corporation (the "Company") maintains the 
Hilton Hotels Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Plan") for certain 
employees of the Company; and

          WHEREAS, the Company has determined that it is desirable to amend 
the Plan as set forth herein; and

          WHEREAS, the Company has the authority to amend the Plan;

          NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective January 1, 
1997, by adding the following new Section 10.9 thereto:

     "10.9 -   BALLY'S EMPLOYEES.


               Employees of the Company who (i) were employed by Bally
     Entertainment Corporation ("Bally's") prior to the Company's acquisition of
     Bally's on or about December 18, 1996 (the "Acquisition"), and (ii) had
     deferred compensation under any nonqualified deferred compensation
     arrangement maintained by Bally's prior to the effective date of the
     Acquisition ("Bally's Deferrals") shall be deemed to have deferred such
     amounts to their respective Deferral Accounts under this Plan as of the
     Acquisition.  Bally's Deferrals shall thereafter be administered, construed
     and paid solely in accordance with the provisions of this Plan.  Provided,
     however, that the Company shall have no obligation to pay any amounts with
     respect to Bally's Deferrals which were not explicitly 

<PAGE>

     assumed by the Company pursuant to the terms of the Acquisition."

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment 1997-1 is hereby adopted this 
_____ day of _______________, 1997.

                              HILTON HOTELS CORPORATION


                              By: _________________________


                              Its: ________________________


                                       2