alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
务必参加所有雇主提供的有关如

何察觉、避免和应对潜在暴力情

况的培训。

遵循现存的可能实施的任何政策,

向您的经理或主管报告感觉到的威

胁或暴力行为。

如果发生威胁或暴力情况,请保

持警惕并支持同事和客户。

如果客户进行威胁或变得暴力,

不要与客户争吵。如果需要,

前往安全区域(理想情况是,

可从内部上锁、有第二条出口

路线的房间,并备有电话或静

音警报器)。

不要试图强迫任何看起来沮丧

或暴力的人遵守COVID-19预防

政策或与COVID-19相关的其他

政策或做法(例如,对家用品

或食品数量的限制)。

CS319744-D 2020年08月14日

cdc.gov/coronavirus

主管

该做 不该做

CS319484-D

让员工预防工作场所

暴力的基本原则
!"

#$$

%

	




$


 &	'(

&)*+***),+-.#


%#/)0+1*2(3+-.#

 		

		

 	/$	&'	4$	
 5

4!67$$
$
!# 89'/(100


"
$&%#/
00!$
	


	:;)




''!	&	
/$	=!%	


&'	
%'/
!=''%
'	$
	




	:$
;	$
	$
=$'%'
!

	='
	&'%	$$!'
!	>'
%	

$

$%
$=
!	$
	&9$	&

%	$
$/'%	$
	

%/
	$$	
5
5&%$/
>

!
/>!	$!			766

)&'

	=
$
			%	!!%		

8?
64 ?8)(2,*

	"9#/64?823,32

7$$/$	 

(1)68


2*12

/	
?@*@)A

,12(()+@*)1
) 	B 6

@  	
/	!$	$
66

* '	&9
/

/'$	7
'	

%//	
	

             6 -6C.#C..#

8-# &DB6

6  68-# &D&7 

9$	

EE8?


8?


 

7$$/$	
 

(1)68
+2*12

/	
?@*@)A

	

	/$		7
		%


/

'

EE8?


8?


/s/ Keith L. Phillips

Mar 14 2016

Entered on Docket: Mar 15 2016


	




),@@/%


	?@*))*

 



#&

#78>@),,

/	
?@*@),+@),,

	#/64

7$$/$	 

(1)68
+2*12

/	
?@*@)A
147

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.18

                              NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE

APPLICANT: Fu- Lin, ZHOU


The application submitted on August 20, 1995 to obtain patent of invention named
A BUILDING ADDITION SHOCK REDUCING METHOD satisfies requirements of patent
application. According to section twenty-eight of the Patent Act and section
thirty-nine in Details and Regulations of the Patent Act, this application has
been accepted. The application number and application date are assigned as
followings :



APPLICATION NUMBER  :            95 1 09347.9
APPLICATION DATE    :            950820

FEE : 1 - 80% Reduced


Explanation in Brief:

This notice is a proof indicating that the Department of Patent of China has
accepted the applicant's application for a patent.

The Application number is the file number assigned by the Department of Patent
of China. Nine digits or characters compose the application number. The third
digit counting from the left represents the type of the application. Digit "1"
stands for invention; Digit "2" stands for practical new model type; Digit
"3"stands for apparent design. If the applicant finds that the application
number does not correctly stands for his/her application type, he/she should ask
the Department of Patent to make correction within 15 days from the date when
this notice is received by the applicant.

According to the twenty-eighth regulation stated in the Patent Act, if the
application is submitted by mail, the date of the postmark on the application
documents is assigned as the application date. If the applicant finds the
application date assigned different from the mailing date, he/ she can ask the
Department of Patent to change the application date provided with proof of the
mail register within one month from the date when this notice is received by the
applicant.

This notice has very important instructions printed on the back. It is the
applicants' responsibilities to read those instructions carefully.
### §460l–9. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 88–578, title I, §7, formerly §6, Sept. 3, 1964, 78 Stat. 903; Pub. L. 90–401, §1(c), July 15, 1968, 82 Stat. 355; renumbered §7, Pub. L. 92–347, §2, July 11, 1972, 86 Stat. 459; amended Pub. L. 93–205, §13(c), Dec. 28, 1973, 87 Stat. 902; Pub. L. 94–422, title I, §101(4), Sept. 28, 1976, 90 Stat. 1317; Pub. L. 95–42, §1(3)–(5), June 10, 1977, 91 Stat. 210, 211; Pub. L. 96–203, §2, Mar. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 81; Pub. L. 99–645, title III, §302, Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3587; Pub. L. 103–437, §6(p)(3), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4586; Pub. L. 104–333, div. I, title VIII, §814(b), (d)(2)(C), Nov. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 4194, 4196; Pub. L. 106–176, title I, §§120(b), 129, Mar. 10, 2000, 114 Stat. 28, 30, related to allocation of land and water conservation fund moneys for Federal purposes. See sections 100506(c) and 200306 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.

A prior section 7 of Pub. L. 88–578 was renumbered section 8 and was classified to section 460l–10 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 113–287.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 16421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6868]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License; Rescission of Order of 
Revocation

    Notice is hereby given that the Order revoking the following 
licenses are being rescinded by the Federal Maritime Commission 
pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. chapter 
409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing 
of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515.

    License Number: 2739NF.
    Name: Alison Transport Inc.
    Address: 1800-A Access Road, Oceanside, NY 11572.
    Order Published: FR: 2/25/11 (Volume 76, No. 38, Pg. 10594).

    License Number: 019544NF.
    Name: Japan Star America, Inc. dba Innex America.
    Address: 550 E. Carson Plaza Drive, Suite 109, Carson, CA 90746.
    Order Published: FR: 2/25/11 (Volume 76, No. 38, Pg. 10594).

    License Number: 020577F.
    Name: Bosmak, Inc. dba Ocean Breeze Shipping.
    Address: 2501 Harford Road, Baltimore, MD 21218.
    Order Published: FR: 2/09/11 (Volume 76, No. 27, Pg. 7210).

    License Number: 020600N.
    Name: Noel N. Griffith dba Duncan International Shipping.
    Address: 1082 Rogers Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11226.
    Order Published: FR: 2/25/11 (Volume 76, No. 38, Pg. 10594).

Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
[FR Doc. 2011-6868 Filed 3-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 23
- 00040
- CR

Daverne Foy , Appellant

v. The State of Texas , Appellee

FROM THE 390TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D
- 1
- DC
- 19
- 301573 , THE HONORABLE JULIE H. KOCUREK , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Daverne Foy , w ho has not been finally sentenced, see ks to appeal the
trial court ’ s order granting the State ’ s pret rial motion for continuanc e
.

T he standard for determining whether a Texas appe llate court has juri s diction in a
crimin al case “ is not whether the appeal i s precluded by law, but whether the appeal is authorized by law. ” Blanton v. Stat e , 369 S.W.3d 894, 902 ( Tex. Crim. A pp. 2008)

. Because
this standard e xtends to interlocutory appeals, “ c our ts of app e als do not have j urisdiction to
review int erlocutory orders in criminal c a ses unless that jurisdiction ha s been ex pressly granted by law. ” Ra gston v. S t ate , 424 S.W.3d 49, 52 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014)

. No such grant exists f or

a n appeal of an order grantin g a motion for continu ance. See P arker v. State , No. 01

- 16

- 00137

- CR, 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 11056, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [ 1st Dist. ] Oct. 11, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op.) ( dismissing for want of jurisdiction defendant ’ s appeal from trial court ’ s grant of2

St a te ’ s motion for con tinuance). Accordingly, we dismiss th is appeal for want of ju risdiction.
See Tex. R. App. P. 43 .2(f)

.

__________________________________________ Chari L. Kelly , Justice
Before Justices Baker, Kelly, and Smith
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: March 3, 2023
Do Not Publish
CS 315822-R 09/16/2020

Ibintu 10 wakora kugira ngo uhangane 

n’ibimenyetso bya COVID-19 mu rugo

Verisiyo iboneka: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/if-you-are-sick/steps-when-sick.html

Igihe ushobora kuba urwaye cyangwa byaremejwe ko urwaye COVID-19:

1. Guma mu rugo ntusubire 

ku kazi cyangwa ku ishuri. 

Kandi wirinde kujya ahantu 

rusange. Niba ari ngombwa 

ko ugenda, irinde gukoresha 

serivisi z’ingendo rusange, 

gutwarana ku binyabiziga 

cyangwa tagisi.

2. Hangana n’ibimenyetso 

byawe mu bushishozi. 

Niba ibimenyetso byawe 

birushijeho kuba bibi, 

hamagara muganga wawe 

ako kanya. 

3. Ruhuka kandi unywe 

amazi menshi.

4. Niba ufite randevu yo 

kwa muganga, banza 

uhamagare muganga

umubwireko urwaye 

cyangwa ushobora kuba 

ufite COVID-19.

5. Ukeneye ubufasha bwihutirwa 

bwerekeye serivisi z’ubuvuzi, 

hamagara 911 maze 

umenyeshe umukozi wo 

muri serivisi zihutirwa 

ko ushobora kuba urwaye 

cyangwa ufite COVID-19.

6. Ifashishe agatambaro 

upfuke umunwa n’izuru 

cyangwa wifashishe mu 

mpine y’ukuboko.

7. Karaba intoki zawe kenshi 

ukoresheje isabune n’amazi 

meza nibura mu gihe kingana 

n’amasegonda 20, cyangwa 

ukoreshe imiti yagenewe 

gusukura intoki igizwe nibura na 

60% bya arukoro. 

8. Buri uko bishoboka, guma

mu cyumba cyawe wenyine 

no kure y’abandi bantu

mubana mu rugo. Ukwiye 

ndetse no kugira ubwiherero 

bwawe ukoresha wenyine, mu 

gihe bishoboka. Niba bibaye 

ngombwa ko waba uri hamwe 

n’abandi bantu mu rugo 

cyangwa hanze yo mu rugo, 

ambara agapfukamunwa.

9. Iringe gutuma abandi 

bakoreha ibikoresho byawe 

bwite mu rugo, nk’ibyo 

gufatiraho amafunguro, 

amasume n’ibiryamirwa.

10. Sukura ahantu hose hakunda 

gukorwaho, nk kuri za kontwari, 

ku meza, no ku mapata y’inzugi. 

Koresha imiti yabugenewe 

iterwa mu rugo cyangwa 

uhanagure ibikoresho ukurikije 

amabwiriza. 

cdc.gov/coronavirus
### §460nn. Findings and purpose

(a) Congress finds that—

(1) Vermont is a beautiful but small and rural State, situated near four large cities with combined metropolitan populations of over fifteen million;

(2) geographic and topographic characteristics of Vermont provide opportunities for large numbers of people to experience the beauty of primitive areas, but also place unusual pressure to provide options to maximize the availability of such lands for a variety of forms of recreation;

(3) certain lands designated as the Big Branch and Peru Peak Wilderness Areas by title I of this Act are suitable for inclusion as part of the national recreation area; and

(4) certain other lands in the Green Mountain National Forest not designated as wilderness by this Act are of a predominantly roadless nature and possess outstanding wild values that are important for primitive and semiprimitive recreation, watershed protection, wildlife habitat, ecological study, education, and historic and archeological resources, and are deemed suitable for preservation and protection as part of a national recreation area.

(b) The purpose of this subchapter is to designate certain National Forest System lands in the State of Vermont as the Robert T. Stafford White Rocks National Recreation Area in order to preserve and protect their existing wilderness and wild values and to promote wild forest and aquatic habitat for wildlife, watershed protection, opportunities for primitive and semiprimitive recreation, and scenic, ecological, and scientific values.

(Pub. L. 98–322, title II, §201, June 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 256; Pub. L. 110–1, §1(b), Jan. 17, 2007, 121 Stat. 3.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in subsec. (a)(3), (4), is Pub. L. 98–322, June 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 253. Lands in the Green Mountain National Forest were designated as wilderness areas by title I of this Act, and are listed in a table of Wilderness Areas set out under section 1132 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Robert T. Stafford White Rocks National Recreation Area" substituted in subsec. (b) for "White Rocks National Recreation Area" pursuant to section 1(b) of Pub. L. 110–1, set out as a note under section 460nn–1 of this title.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-2252

SADIO DIALLO,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A97-622-486)

Submitted: July 28, 2006 Decided: October 18, 2006

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patrick G. Tzeuton, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner.

Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Donald E. Keener,

Deputy Director, Bryan S. Beier, Senior Litigation Counsel,

Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Sadio Diallo, a native and citizen of Guinea, petitions

for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

(“Board”) denying her motion to reconsider its previous order,

which affirmed, without opinion, the immigration judge’s denial of

Diallo’s requests for asylum and withholding of removal. Because

Diallo failed to raise any issues pertaining to the propriety of

the Board’s denial of her motion to reconsider in the argument

section of her brief, we find that she has failed to preserve any

issues for review. See Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(9)(A) (“[T]he

argument . . . must contain . . . appellant’s contentions and the

reasons for them, with citations to the authorities and parts of

the record on which the appellant relies.”); Edwards v. City of

Goldsboro, 178 F.3d 231, 241 n.6 (4th Cir. 1999) (“Failure to

comply with the specific dictates of [Rule 28] with respect to a

particular claim triggers abandonment of that claim on appeal.”).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated

by the Board. See In re: Diallo, No. A97-622-486 (B.I.A. Oct. 11,

2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### In the Matter of Thomas J. Kelly, Appellant, v Eileen Kelly, Respondent.

[826 NYS2d 117]

In related child custody proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Eisman, J.), dated October 27, 2005, which found him guilty of criminal contempt.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Where, as here, the purported contempt was committed within the immediate view and presence of the court and was punished summarily *(see*Judiciary Law §§ 750, 752; 22 NYCRR 701.2), review must be had under CPLR article 78 and not by way of direct appeal *(see*Judiciary Law § 755; *Matter of Shockome v Shockome,*30 AD3d 529 [2006]; *Matter of Ellman,*117 AD2d 803 [1986]; *People v Longo,*30 AD2d 828 [1968]; *People v Epps,*21 AD2d 650 [1964], *cert denied*379 US 940 [1964]). Moreover, because this matter involves a Family Court Judge, this Court is without original jurisdiction to entertain it as a CPLR article 78 proceeding *(see Matter of Nolan v Lungen,*
      *81061 NY2d 788 [1984]; *Matter of Shockome v Shockome, supra; Matter of O’Connell v Taddeo,*174 Misc 2d 110, 112 [1997]; CPLR 506 [b] [1]).

Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed. Florio, J.E, Adams, Krausman and Rivera, JJ., concur.
§ 655.601 Purpose. To prescribe the policies and procedures of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to obtain basic uniformity of traffic control devices on all streets and highways in accordance with the following references that are approved by the FHWA for application on Federal-aid projects: ( a ) MUTCD.
( b ) AASHTO Guide to Metric Conversion.
( c ) AASHTO Traffic Engineering Metric Conversion Factors.
( d ) The material listed in this paragraph (a) of this section is incorporated by reference into this section with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. To enforce any edition other than that specified in this section, the FHWA must publish a document in the Federal Register and the material must be available to the public. All approved material is available for inspection at the FHWA and at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Contact Federal Highway Administration, Office of Transportation Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-8043; *https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/contactus.htm .* For information on the availability of this material at NARA, email: *fr.inspection@nara.gov ,* or go to: *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html .* The material may be obtained from the following source(s) in this paragraph (d). ( 1 ) AASHTO, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Suite 249, 444 North Capitol Street NW., Washington, DC 20001 ( i ) AASHTO Guide to Metric Conversion, 1993;
( ii ) AASHTO, Traffic Engineering Metric Conversion Factors, 1993—Addendum to the Guide to Metric Conversion, October 1993.
( 2 ) FHWA, Federal Highway Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, telephone (202) 366-1993, also available at *http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov .* ( i ) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (MUTCD), 11th Edition, FHWA, December 2023.
( ii ) [Reserved]
[77 FR 28466, May 14, 2012, as amended at 87 FR 47931, Aug. 5, 2022; 88 FR 87695, Dec. 19, 2023]
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 00508**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  

### 00508\00508_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement x 

### 00508\00508_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 00508\00508_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 00508\00508_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 00508\00508_PartA.XLS Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00508\00508_PartB.XLS Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00508\00508_PartC.XLS Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00508\00508_PartD.XLS Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00508\00508_PartH.XLS Plant submitted survey file



### 00508\Supplemental Documents\00508_ash_system_diagrams.xlsx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 00508\Supplemental Documents\00508_EERC final report Feb09.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 00508\Supplemental Documents\00508_EERC final report sept 09 reemission.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 00508\Supplemental Documents\00508_Effluent ICR Certification.jpg Plant certification statement 

### 00508\Supplemental Documents\00508_MAP_and_WB.xlsx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 00508\Supplemental Documents\00508_pond_diagrams.xlsx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 00508\Supplemental Documents\00508_questions.xls Draft Questions for Follow Up

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
§ 630.112 Agreement provisions. ( a ) The State, through its transportation department, accepts and agrees to comply with the applicable terms and conditions set forth in title 23, U.S.C., the regulations issued pursuant thereto, the policies and procedures promulgated by the FHWA relative to the designated project covered by the agreement, and all other applicable Federal laws and regulations.
( b ) Federal funds obligated for the project must not exceed the amount agreed to on the project agreement, the balance of the estimated total cost being an obligation of the State. Such obligation of Federal funds extends only to project costs incurred by the State after the execution of a formal project agreement with the FHWA.
( c ) The State must stipulate that as a condition to payment of the Federal funds obligated, it accepts and will comply with the following applicable provisions: ( 1 ) *Project for acquisition of rights-of-way.* In the event that actual construction of a road on this right-of-way is not undertaken by the close of the twentieth fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the project is authorized, the State DOT will repay to the FHWA the sum or sums of Federal funds paid to the transportation department under the terms of the agreement. The State may request a time extension beyond the 20-year limit with no repayment of Federal funds, and the FHWA may approve this request if it is considered reasonable.
( 2 ) *Preliminary engineering project.* In the event that right-of-way acquisition for, or actual construction of, the road for which this preliminary engineering is undertaken is not started by the close of the tenth fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the project is authorized, the State DOT will repay to the FHWA the sum or sums of Federal funds paid to the transportation department under the terms of the agreement. The State may request a time extension for any preliminary engineering project beyond the 10-year limit with no repayment of Federal funds, and the FHWA may approve this request if it is considered reasonable.
( 3 ) *Drug-free workplace.* By signing the project agreement, the State DOT agrees to maintain a drug-free workplace, identify all known workplaces under Federal awards, and fulfill other responsibilities required by 49 CFR part 32.
( 4 ) *Suspension and debarment verification.* By signing the project agreement, the State DOT agrees to verify that contractors are not excluded through suspension or debarment, as required by 2 CFR parts 180, subpart C, and 1200.
( 5 ) *Lobbying certification.* By signing the project agreement, the State DOT agrees to abide by the lobbying restrictions set forth in 49 CFR part 20. In signing the project agreement, the State is providing the certification required in appendix A to 49 CFR part 20.
[66 FR 23847, May 10, 2001, as amended at 85 FR 72931, Nov. 16, 2020]
### §460aa–11. Patents; restriction on issuance

Patents shall not hereafter be issued for locations and claims heretofore made in the recreation area under the mining laws of the United States.

(Pub. L. 92–400, §12, Aug. 22, 1972, 86 Stat. 615.)