alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.17

THIRD AMENDMENT TO  1997 INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR STOCK OPTION PLAN

This Third Amendment to the Hilton Hotels Corporation 1997 Independent Director Stock Option Plan (this
"Amendment") is made and entered into as of November 14, 2001, by Hilton Hotels Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation").

WHEREAS,the Corporation has adopted the Hilton Hotels Corporation 1997 Independent Director Stock Option Plan, which was approved by the
stockholders of the Corporation on May 7, 1998, and amended by the First Amendment thereto dated as of December 31, 1998 and the Second Amendment thereto dated as of November 11,
1999 (as amended, the "Plan");

WHEREAS,pursuant to resolutions of the Board of Directors of the Corporation and recommendations of the Compensation Committee thereof,
the Corporation deems it advisable to adopt certain amendments to the Change in Control provisions of its employee benefit plans; and

WHEREAS,the Board of Directors of the Corporation deems it desirable and in the best interests of the Corporation and its stockholders to
amend the Plan to conform to the amendments made to the other employee benefit plans.

NOW, THEREFORE,in consideration of the conditions and agreements set forth in the Plan and this Amendment, and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Corporation hereby amends the Plan as follows:

1.Definitions.Capitalized terms used in this Amendment, unless otherwise defined
herein, shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Plan.

2.Amendments.Subject to the conditions set forth below, the Plan is hereby amended by
amending and restating Section 1(c) thereof to read in its entirety as follows:



1

---



3.Corporate Action.The execution, delivery, and performance of this Amendment has been
duly authorized by all requisite corporate action on the part of the Corporation and this Amendment has been duly executed and delivered by the Corporation.

2

---

4.Severability.Any provision of this Amendment held by a court of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable shall not impair or invalidate the remainder of this Amendment and the effect thereof shall be confined to the provision so held to be invalid or
unenforceable.

5.References.Any reference to the Plan contained in any document, instrument or agreement executed
in connection with the Plan, except where the context otherwise requires, shall be deemed to be a reference to the Plan as modified by this Amendment.

6.Effective Date.This Amendment shall be effective as of November 14, 2001,
with respect to any awards granted under the Plan on or after such date.

7.Agreement.The Plan shall continue to be and remain in full force and effect in
accordance with the terms thereof, as modified by this Amendment.

[signature
page to follow]

3

---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Corporation has executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written.

| |  | HILTON HOTELS CORPORATION
| |  | -------------------------
| |  | By:                      

4

---

QuickLinks
### §460zz–6. Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this part.

(Pub. L. 100–696, title VII, §707, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4607.)
From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Thundiyil/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Thomas Gillis/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Nick Hutson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 11/08/2011 07:09 PM Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on EGU MACT Rule

Hi, Consistent with the Executive Order, attached is the handout from the meeting today.

Regards, Cortney

-----Original Appointment----- From: Echols, Mabel E. Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on EGU MACT Rule When: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 1:00 PM-1:30 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada). Where: Room 9104 New Executive Office Building

Bob Baugh, AFL-CIO Industrial Union Council has requested this meeting.
1

The Honorable Harold D. Vietor, United States District Judge for the Southern

District of Iowa, sitting by designation in the Eastern District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-3978

___________

Edward Charles Nicholson, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Eastern

* District of Arkansas.

Garry Stewart, M.D. Faulkner *

County Detention Facility; * [UNPUBLISHED]

Carl Johnson, M.D. Pulaski *

County Detention Center, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: February 5, 2010

Filed: February 23, 2010

___________

Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Edward Nicholson appeals the district court’s1

 grant of summary judgment for

defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action claiming defendants were deliberately

indifferent to his serious medical needs stemming from his Type II diabetes.
-2-

Following careful de novo review, see Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th

Cir. 2006), we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
### §432. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, act June 8, 1906, ch. 3060, §§3, 4, 34 Stat. 225; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501, related to permits to examine ruins, excavations, and gathering of objects; regulations. See sections 320302 and 320303 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 204 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 204

 To return to the President of the United States the Arms Trade Treaty.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 13, 2019

Mr. Paul submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                          EXECUTIVE RESOLUTION

 
 To return to the President of the United States the Arms Trade Treaty.

Whereas, on April 29, 2019, President Donald J. Trump transmitted the following 
        to the United States Senate: ``I have concluded that it is not in the 
        interest of the United States to become a party to the Arms Trade Treaty 
        (Senate Treaty Doc. 114-14, transmitted December 9, 2016). I have, 
        therefore, decided to withdraw the aforementioned treaty from the Senate 
        and accordingly request that it be returned to me.'': Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate shall return to the 
President of the United States the Arms Trade Treaty, Done at New York 
on April 2, 2013 (Treaty Doc. 114-14).
                                 <all>
```
#### § 450.200 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to implement the provisions of 23 U.S.C. 135, 23 U.S.C. 150, and 49 U.S.C. 5304, as amended, which require each State to carry out a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive performance-based statewide multimodal transportation planning process, including the development of a long-range statewide transportation plan and STIP, that facilitates the safe and efficient management, operation, and development of surface transportation systems that will serve the mobility needs of people and freight (including accessible pedestrian walkways, bicycle transportation facilities, and intermodal facilities that support intercity transportation, including intercity bus facilities and commuter van pool providers) and that fosters economic growth and development within and between States and urbanized areas, and take into consideration resiliency needs while minimizing transportation-related fuel consumption and air pollution in all areas of the State, including those areas subject to the metropolitan transportation planning requirements of 23 U.S.C. 134 and 49 U.S.C. 5303.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 10.8

                          Aspect Medical Systems, Inc.
has requested that the market portions of this agreement be granted confidential
  treatment pursuant to Rule 406 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

HEWLETT-PACKARD GMBH
Medical Products Group
Herrenberger Strasse 110 - 140
D-71034 Boeblingen
Germany

August 27, 1999

Mr J. Breckenridge Eagle
Chairman
Aspect Medical Systems, Inc.
2 Vision Drive
Natick, MA 01760-2059
USA


Dear Breck,

As we discussed on Friday, the following is confirmation of our willingness to
allow Aspect to set the expectation that customers purchasing the stand-alone
A2000 monitor in North America will be able to purchase an exchange to the HP
BIS module solution, once it becomes available, at an incremental price of [**].
This interim program is designed to bridge-the-gap until such time that Aspect
and HP are able to announce and implement the joint co-marketing program, as
defined under our overall agreement. The following conditions need to apply:

1.   Orders for this exchange will only be taken once the module is released in
     North America;

2.   Customers need to be made aware that there may be some additional costs for
     upgrading their existing Viridia CMS and Viridia 24/26 monitors in order to
     be compatible with the BIS module;

3.   Customers ordering this exchange will do so directly from Aspect and Aspect
     will be responsible for delivering and installing the modules at the
     customer's site (some basic "knobology" training will need to be provided
     to the Aspect salesforce by HP's North American operation);

4.   Aspect will supply HP with a complete list of all customers (name, address
     and date of installation) who take advantage of this exchange;

5.   These exchange modules can only be offered to customers who purchased an
     A2000 monitor between the effective date of our agreement and the
     introduction of the joint co-marketing agreement in North America (a copy
     of the customer's original purchase order will be required at the time of
     ordering the modules);

6.   HP will supply Aspect with up to a maximum of [**] BIS module systems for
     this purpose, at a price of [**] each (assumes that all customer ordering,
     delivery and installation is performed by Aspect, as outlined above).
     Warranty and after-sales servicing responsibility will remain with HP;

7.   Aspect will offer HP the special transfer price of [**] for the HP BIS
     module kits required to cover module systems sold as part of this program.

I think you'll agree that this compromise solution will help to allay any risk
of a customer postponing his decision to purchase BIS technology.

With best regards

/s/ Steve Bebb
--------------------------
Steve Bebb
Market Development Manager
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-41191

Summary Calendar

MARK CRAWFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BRUCE CHRISTIAN, Individually and Official Capacities;
SHARYLAND INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Southern District of Texas

B-00-CV-151

May 30, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Mark Crawford appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

claims against Sharyland Independent School District and Bruce

Christian for excessive corporal punishment. Crawford argues that

excessive corporal punishment is a viola tion of substantive due

process, and should be actionable under § 1983. He acknowledges

that under our existing precedent his claims are without merit, but1 Moore v. Willis Indep. Sch. Dist. , 233 F.3d 871, 874 (5th

Cir. 2000).

2 Id . at 876. he seeks to preserve the issue for further review.

We have consistently held that a public school student cannot

state a § 1983 claim for denial of substantive due process based on

excessive corporal punishment. 1 The magistrate judge properly

dismissed Crawford’s § 1983 claims.

It is also well-established that Texas provides adequate state

remedies for excessive corporal punishment. 2 Thus Crawford’s

argument that he should be allowed to proceed against the School

District because Texas provides no remedy is foreclosed.

AFFIRMED.
§ 551.13 Application to marry. ( a ) A federal inmate confined in a Bureau institution who wants to get married shall submit a request to marry to the inmate's unit team. The unit team shall evaluate the request based on the criteria identified in § 551.12. A written report of the unit team's findings, and its recommendation, shall be forwarded to the Warden for a final decision.
( b ) The Warden shall notify the inmate in writing whether the inmate's request to marry is approved or disapproved. A copy of this notification shall be placed in the inmate's central file. When the Warden's decision is to disapprove the inmate's request, the notification to the inmate shall include a statement of reason(s) for that action. The Warden shall advise the inmate that the decision may be appealed through the Administrative Remedy Procedure.
( c ) All expenses of the marriage (for example, a marriage license) shall be paid by the inmate, the inmate's intended spouse, the inmate's family, or other appropriate source approved by the Warden. The Warden may not permit appropriated funds to be used for an inmate marriage.
#### § 630.701 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to prescribe procedures for advancing the construction of Federal-aid highway projects without obligating Federal funds apportioned or allocated to the State.
Tonto National Forest
Supervisor's Office q Legend
UTM Zone 12 NAD83
1 Mar 2010 [J Treatment sites

00.03.07 0.14
Mexican Spotted Owl PACs
### §450ss–4. Repealed. Pub. L. 108–199, div. F, title V, §544(e)(1), Jan. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 348

Section, Pub. L. 105–58, §6, Oct. 9, 1997, 111 Stat. 1264, provided for duties and authorities of Oklahoma City National Memorial Trust.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 108–199, div. F, title V, §544(e)(2), Jan. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 348, provided that: "The repeal under this subsection [repealing this section] shall take effect upon the transfer of the Memorial property, rights, authorities, and duties pursuant to the amendments made by subsection (d) [amending section 450ss–3 of this title]."
§ 630.205 Preparation, submission, and approval. ( a ) The contents and number of copies of the PS&E assembly shall be determined by the FHWA.
( b ) Plans and specifications shall describe the location and design features and the construction requirements in sufficient detail to facilitate the construction, the contract control and the estimation of construction costs of the project. The estimate shall reflect the anticipated cost of the project in sufficient detail to provide an initial prediction of the financial obligations to be incurred by the State and FHWA and to permit an effectice review and comparison of the bids received.
( c ) PS&E assemblies for Federal-aid highway projects shall be submitted to the FHWA for approval.
( d ) The State DOT shall be advised of approval of the PS&E by the FHWA.
( e ) No project or part thereof for actual construction shall be advertised for contract nor work commenced by force account until the PS&E has been approved by the FHWA and the State DOT has been so notified, except in the case of an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity project conforming to the requirements of 23 CFR part 635 subpart F.
[43 FR 58564, Dec. 15, 1978, as amended at 85 FR 72931, Nov. 16, 2020]
### §398b. Repealed. Pub. L. 85–404, May 16, 1958, 72 Stat. 112

Section, act Aug. 2, 1956, ch. 885, §3, 70 Stat. 941, authorized an appropriation for capital improvements and an annual appropriation for administration of the Virgin Islands National Park.
### §460nnn–92. Release from wilderness study area status

The Federal lands included in the Wildlands Juniper Management Area established under section 460nnn–91 of this title are no longer subject to the requirement of section 1782(c) of title 43 pertaining to managing the lands so as not to impair the suitability of the lands for preservation as wilderness.

(Pub. L. 106–399, title V, §502, Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1670.)
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSynthesis and Characterization of Cobalt Containing Nanoparticles on Alumina A Potential Catalyst for Gas to Liquid Fuels ProductionFisher-Tröpsch synthesis (FTS) is a century-old gas-to-liquid (GTL) technology that commonly employs cobalt (Co, on an oxide support) or iron (supported or not) species catalysts. It has been well established that the activity of the Co catalyst depends directly upon the number of surface Co atoms. The addition of promoter (mainly noble) metals has been widely utilized to increase the fraction of Co that is available for surface catalysis. Direct synthesis of Co nanoparticles is a possible alternative approach; our preliminary synthesis and characterization efforts are described. Materials were characterized by various transmission microscopies and energy dispersive spectroscopy. Tri-n-octylphosphine oxide (TOPO) and dicobalt octacarbonyl were heated under argon to a temperature of 180 deg with constant stirring for 1 hr. Quenching the reaction in toluene produced Co-containing nanoparticles with a diameter of 5 to 10 nm. Alternatively, an alumina support (SBA-200 Al2O3) was added; the reaction was further stirred and the temperature was decreased to 140 deg to reduce the rate of further growth/ripening of the nucleated Co nanoparticles. A typical size of Co-containing NPs was also found to be in the range of 5 to 10 nm. This can be contrasted with a range of 50 to 200 nm for conventionally-produced Co-Al2O3 Fischer-Tröpsch catalysts. This method shows great potential for production of highly dispersed catalysts that are either supported or unsupported.Document ID20160011333Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsCowen, Jonathan*(Case Western Reserve Univ. Cleveland, OH, United States)*Hepp, Aloysius F.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 16, 2016Publication DateSeptember 1, 2016Subject CategoryChemistry And Materials (General)Inorganic, Organic And Physical ChemistryEnergy Production And ConversionReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2016-219138E-19262GRC-E-DAA-TN33754Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 295670.01.04.56Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Keywordsaluminum oxidesnanoparticlestransmission electron microscopyphosphinescatalystscobaltAvailable DownloadsNameType20160011333.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### German Savings Bank in the City of New York v. Philip Wagner, as Committee, etc.

Motion denied. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
### §410aaa–80. Land appraisal

Lands and interests in lands acquired pursuant to this Act shall be appraised without regard to the presence of a species listed as threatened or endangered pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).

(Pub. L. 103–433, title VII, §710, Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4501.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is defined in section 3 of Pub. L. 103–433, which is set out as a Definitions note under section 410aaa of this title.

The Endangered Species Act of 1973, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 93–205, Dec. 28, 1973, 87 Stat. 884, which is classified principally to chapter 35 (§1531 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1531 of this title and Tables.
### §460u–19. Acquisition of land outside present boundaries; notice to Congressional committees; publication in Federal Register

After notifying the Committees on Interior and Insular Affairs of the United States Congress, in writing, of his intentions to do so and of the reasons therefor, the Secretary may, if he finds that such lands would make a significant contribution to the purposes for which the Park was established, accept title to any lands, or interests in lands, located outside the present boundaries of the Park but contiguous thereto or to lands acquired under this section, such lands the State of Indiana or its political subdivisions may acquire and offer to donate to the United States or which any private person, organization, or public or private corporation may offer to donate to the United States and he shall administer such lands as a part of the Park after publishing notice to that effect in the Federal Register.

(Pub. L. 89–761, §19, formerly §20, as added and renumbered Pub. L. 94–549, §1(8), (9), Oct. 18, 1976, 90 Stat. 2532, 2533; amended Pub. L. 116–6, div. E, title I, §115(a)(1)(B), Feb. 15, 2019, 133 Stat. 232.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2019—Pub. L. 116–6 substituted "Park" for "lakeshore" wherever appearing.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs of the Senate abolished and replaced by Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate, effective Feb. 11, 1977. See Rule XXV of Standing Rules of the Senate, as amended by Senate Resolution No. 4 (popularly cited as the "Committee System Reorganization Amendments of 1977"), approved Feb. 4, 1977.

Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs of the House of Representatives changed to Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives on Jan. 5, 1993, by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Third Congress.