alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §460w–3. Retention rights of owners of improved property

#### (a) Designation of lands as administrative site, visitor center, and related facilities; election by owners of term of rights retained; adjustment of compensation

With the exception of not more than eighty acres of land to be designated within the lakeshore boundaries by the Secretary as an administrative site, visitor center, and related facilities, as soon as practicable, any owner or owners of improved property on the date of its acquisition by the Secretary may, as a condition of such acquisition, retain for themselves and their successors or assigns a right of use and occupancy of the improved property for noncommercial residential purposes for a definite term not to exceed twenty-five years, or, in lieu thereof, for a term ending at the death of the owner, or the death of his spouse, whichever is the later. The owner shall elect the term to be reserved. The Secretary shall pay to the owner the fair market value of the property on the date of such acquisition less the fair market value on such date of the right retained by the owner.

#### (b) Termination right of Secretary upon determination that retained property or any portion thereof has ceased to be used for noncommercial residential or agricultural purposes; adjustment of compensation

A right of use and occupancy retained pursuant to this section may be terminated with respect to the entire property by the Secretary upon his determination that the property or any portion thereof has ceased to be used for noncommercial residential or for agricultural purposes, and upon tender to the holder of a right an amount equal to the fair market value, as of the date of the tender, of that portion of the right which remains unexpired on the date of termination.

#### (c) "Improved property" defined

The term "improved property", as used in this section, shall mean a detached, noncommercial residential dwelling, the construction of which was begun before January 1, 1967, or before January 1, 1985 for those lands referred to in section 460w(b) of this title (hereinafter referred to as "dwelling"), together with so much of the land on which the dwelling is situated, the said land being in the same ownership as the dwelling, as the Secretary shall designate to be reasonably necessary for the enjoyment of the dwelling for the sole purpose of noncommercial residential use, together with any structures accessory to the dwelling which are situated on the land so designated.

(Pub. L. 91–424, §4, Sept. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 880; Pub. L. 99–497, §1(3), Oct. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 1267.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1986—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 99–497 inserted ", or before January 1, 1985 for those lands referred to in section 460w(b) of this title".
#### Regina Moskowitz, Respondent, v. Accurate Holding Corporation et al., Defendants, and Michael Greenberg et al., Interveners-Appellants.

No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

_________________________

No. 06-12-00077-CV

______________________________

IN RE: J.K., A MINOR CHILD

On Appeal from the Fifth Judicial District Court

Cass County, Texas

Trial Court No. 04-C-687

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Tiffany Nicole Morton, appellant, filed her pro se notice of appeal July 24, 2012.

She has neither filed a docketing statement, nor has she paid the filing fee. Morton has 

also not filed a proof of indigency in lieu of a filing fee. Therefore, Morton is responsible for 

payment of the filing fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1; app. A(B)(1). 

On August 28, 2012, we contacted Morton by letter, giving her an opportunity to cure the 

various defects, and warning her that if we did not receive an adequate response within ten days, 

this appeal would be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), 

(c).

Morton informed us that the filing fee would be mailed on September 13. That fee has 

not been received. Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), we dismiss this appeal for want of 

prosecution.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: September 25, 2012

Date Decided: September 26, 2012
Editorial Note on Part 635
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 635 appear at 67 FR 75924, Dec. 10, 2002.

§ 635.122 Participation in progress payments. ( a ) Federal funds will participate in the costs to the State DOT of construction accomplished as the work progresses, based on a request for reimbursement submitted by State transportation departments. When the contract provisions provide for payment for stockpiled materials, the amount of the reimbursement request upon which participation is based may include the appropriate value of approved specification materials delivered by the contractor at the project site or at another designated location in the vicinity of such construction, provided that: ( 1 ) The material conforms with the requirements of the plans and specifications.
( 2 ) The material is supported by a paid invoice or a receipt for delivery of materials. If supported by a receipt of delivery of materials, the contractor must furnish the paid invoice within a reasonable time after receiving payment from the State DOT; and
( 3 ) The quantity of a stockpiled material eligible for Federal participation in any case shall not exceed the total estimated quantity required to complete the project. The value of the stockpiled material shall not exceed the appropriate portion of the value of the contract item or items in which such materials are to be incorporated.
( b ) The materials may be stockpiled by the contractor at a location not in the vicinity of the project, if the State DOT determines that because of required fabrication at an off-site location, it is not feasible or practicable to stockpile the materials in the vicinity of the project.
( c ) In the case of a design-build project, the State DOT must define its procedures for making progress payments on lump sum contracts in the Request for Proposal document.
( d ) In the case of a CM/GC project, the State DOT must define its procedures for making construction phase progress payments in either the solicitation or the construction services contract documents.
[56 FR 37004, Aug. 2, 1991, as amended at 67 FR 75925, Dec. 10, 2002; 81 FR 86943, Dec. 2, 2016]
§ 772.19 Construction noise. For all Type I and II projects, a highway agency shall: ( a ) Identify land uses or activities that may be affected by noise from construction of the project. The identification is to be performed during the project development studies.
( b ) Determine the measures that are needed in the plans and specifications to minimize or eliminate adverse construction noise impacts to the community. This determination shall include a weighing of the benefits achieved and the overall adverse social, economic, and environmental effects and costs of the abatement measures.
( c ) Incorporate the needed abatement measures in the plans and specifications.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 15989]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6733]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel, New, Rapidly-Acting Treatments for Treatment-
Resistant Depression (RAPID).
    Date: April 7, 2011.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Francois Boller, MD, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of 
Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 
6142, MSC 9606, Bethesda, MD 20892-9606, 301-443-1513, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5a383536363f283c1a373b333674343332743d352c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="680a0704040d1a0e280509010446060100460f071e">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, 
Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, 
Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist 
Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: March 15, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-6733 Filed 3-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### NUMBER 13 - 1 2 - 00 380 - CV 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ AUBREY THEODE F/D/B/A Appellant, HORN HEAVEN RANCH ,
v. DIGITAL SIGN & LAMINATING, INC. , A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant, Aubrey Theode f/d/b/a Horn Heaven Ranch , perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 1 of Nueces County, Texas, in cause

num ber 2011CCV

- 61635

- 1 . The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal2

on grounds that all matters in controversy between them in this cause have been settled. The parties request that this Court dismiss the appeal. The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(a). The joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at the parties’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
PER CURIAM Delivered and filed the 20 th day of June , 201 3

.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS RULINGS

Release No. 6863/August 15, 2022

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-20801

In the Matter of

:

DF GROWTH REIT II, LLC : STAY ORDER

The Securities and Exchange Commission instituted this proceeding with an Order 

Temporarily Suspending Exemption Pursuant to Section 3(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 and 

Rule 258 of Regulation A Thereunder and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing on March 16, 2022. 

The parties have jointly requested a Stay Pending Commission Consideration of Offer of 

Settlement, stating that they have agreed in principle to a settlement on all major terms. 

Accordingly, the proceeding, including all procedural dates, will be stayed, contingent upon 

compliance with 17 C.F.R. § 201.161(c)(2). 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

/S/ Carol Fox Foelak 

Carol Fox Foelak

Administrative Law Judge
§ 541.67 Review of controlled housing status. ( a ) Staff designated by the Warden shall evaluate regularly an inmate's adjustment while in controlled housing status. A medical staff member shall see the inmate daily, and regularly record medical and behavioral impressions. Once every 90 days, staff, comprised of a correctional and case management supervisor, and a member of the medical staff, shall meet with the inmate. The inmate is required to attend this meeting in order to be considered for release to the general population. Any refusal by the inmate to attend this meeting will be documented. Staff, at this meeting, shall make an assessment of the inmate's adjustment while in controlled housing and the likely health threat the inmate poses to others by his actions.
( b ) The Warden shall serve as the review authority at the institutional level, and shall make a recommendation to the Regional Director when he believes the inmate should be considered for release from controlled housing.
( c ) An inmate may appeal a Warden's decision not to recommend release from controlled housing to the Regional Director within five working days of receipt of that decision.
( d ) Upon recommendation of the Warden, or upon appeal from the inmate, the Regional Director may decide whether or not to release the inmate to general population from controlled housing status.
( e ) An inmate may appeal a decision of the Regional Director, through the Administrative Remedy Program, directly to the National Inmate Appeals Administrator, Office of General Counsel, within 30 calendar days of the Regional Director's decision (see 28 CFR 542.15).
[54 FR 11323, Mar. 17, 1989; 54 FR 18198, Apr. 27, 1989, as amended at 63 FR 5218, Jan. 30, 1998]
### §460e. Authorization for sale of public lands; rights of lessee

Whenever the Secretary of the Army determines that any Government-owned lands other than lands withdrawn or reserved from the public domain within reservoir areas under his control (1) are not required for project purposes or for public recreational use, and (2) are being used for or are available for cottage site development and use, he is authorized to offer such lands, or any part thereof, for sale for such purposes in accordance with the provisions of this subchapter: Provided, however, That any lands held under lease for cottage site purposes on August 6, 1956 shall not be offered for sale to anyone other than the lessee until after sixty days from the date of the written notice to the lessee as provided in section 460f of this title, or the termination or expiration date of such lease, whichever is later, and the lessee shall have the right during such period to purchase any lands leased to him which the Secretary determines are available for sale.

(Aug. 6, 1956, ch. 987, §1, 70 Stat. 1065.)
Case 15-36264-KRH Doc 10 Filed 01/13/16 Entered 01/13/16 17:56:31 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 10
Case 15-36264-KRH Doc 10 Filed 01/13/16 Entered 01/13/16 17:56:31 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 10
Case 15-36264-KRH Doc 10 Filed 01/13/16 Entered 01/13/16 17:56:31 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 10
Case 15-36264-KRH Doc 10 Filed 01/13/16 Entered 01/13/16 17:56:31 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 10
Case 15-36264-KRH Doc 10 Filed 01/13/16 Entered 01/13/16 17:56:31 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 10
Case 15-36264-KRH Doc 10 Filed 01/13/16 Entered 01/13/16 17:56:31 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 10
Case 15-36264-KRH Doc 10 Filed 01/13/16 Entered 01/13/16 17:56:31 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 10
Case 15-36264-KRH Doc 10 Filed 01/13/16 Entered 01/13/16 17:56:31 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 10
Case 15-36264-KRH Doc 10 Filed 01/13/16 Entered 01/13/16 17:56:31 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 10
Case 15-36264-KRH Doc 10 Filed 01/13/16 Entered 01/13/16 17:56:31 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 10
§ 750.307 FHWA project approval. Authorization to proceed with acquisitions on a sign removal project shall not be issued until such time as the State has submitted to FHWA the following: ( a ) A general description of the project.
( b ) The total number of signs to be acquired.
( c ) The total estimated cost of the sign removal project, including a breakdown of incidental, acquisition and removal costs.
### §460l–19. Feasibility reports

Effective on and after July 1, 1966, neither the Secretary of the Interior nor any bureau nor any person acting under his authority shall engage in the preparation of any feasibility report under reclamation law with respect to any water resource project unless the preparation of such feasibility report has been specifically authorized by law, any other provision of law to the contrary notwithstanding.

(Pub. L. 89–72, §8, July 9, 1965, 79 Stat. 217.)
### §3460. Authorization of appropriations

#### (a) In general

There are authorized to be 1 such sums as are necessary to carry out this subchapter.

#### (b) Loans

The Secretary shall not use more than $15,000,000 of any funds made available for a fiscal year to make loans under this subchapter.

#### (c) Availability

Funds appropriated to carry out this subchapter shall remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 97–98, title XV, §1537, as added Pub. L. 107–171, title II, §2504, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 274.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Prior sections 3460 and 3461 were omitted in the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 107–171.

Section 3460, Pub. L. 97–98, title XV, §1537, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1340, related to supplemental authority of Secretary.

Section 3461, Pub. L. 97–98, title XV, §1538, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1341; Pub. L. 101–624, title XIV, §1452(b), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3611; Pub. L. 104–127, title III, §383, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1016, authorized appropriations for each of the fiscal years 1996 through 2002.

1 So in original. Probably should be followed by "appropriated".
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 395 

Recognizing the 40th anniversary of the Iran Hostage Crisis, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 31, 2019 

Mr. ISAKSON (for himself, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. GARDNER, Mr. 

COONS, Ms. WARREN, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. 

SCOTT of Florida, Mr. JONES, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. CASEY, Mr. BRAUN, 

and Mr. CRUZ) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Foreign Relations 

DECEMBER 17, 2019 

Reported by Mr. RISCH, without amendment 

JANUARY 8, 2020 

Considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 40th anniversary of the Iran Hostage Crisis, 

and for other purposes. 

Whereas, on November 4, 1979, 66 United States diplomats, 

military personnel, and civilians were taken hostage from 

the United States Embassy in Tehran by the Government 

of the Islamic Republic of Iran in what became known as 

the Iran Hostage Crisis; 

Whereas 13 of the 66 American hostages were released by 

November 20, 1979; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 395 ATS 

Whereas 8 members of the United States Armed Forces died 

in an attempt to rescue the hostages on April 25, 1980; 

Whereas another American hostage was released on July 11, 

1980, after 250 days in captivity; 

Whereas, after 444 days in captivity, the remaining 52 hostages were released on January 20, 1981, with the signing of the Algiers Accords; 

Whereas the Iran Hostages were subjected to mock executions and other forms of physical and emotional torture 

at the hands of the Government of the Islamic Republic 

of Iran; 

Whereas the Iran Hostages and their families still suffer 

from the events of the Iran Hostage Crisis; 

Whereas the Algiers Accords prevented the Iran Hostages 

from taking legal action to pursue compensation from the 

Islamic Republic of Iran for their time in captivity; 

Whereas many of the Iran Hostages and their families finally 

became eligible to receive compensation through the enactment in 2015 of the Justice for United States Victims 

of State Sponsored Terrorism Act (34 U.S.C. 20144) and 

the creation of the United States Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Fund; and 

Whereas, 40 years after its founding, the Islamic Republic of 

Iran continues to promulgate a culture of fear, oppression, and violence as one of the leading state sponsors of 

terrorism: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the 40th anniversary of the Iran 

3 Hostage Crisis; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 395 ATS 

1 (2) honors the suffering of the Iran Hostages 

2 and their families during the Iran Hostage Crisis, as 

3 well as the sacrifices made by those who attempted 

4 to rescue the hostages; and 

5 (3) supports the designation of a national day 

6 of remembrance on November 4, 2019, for the Iran 

7 Hostage Crisis. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Walnut  Valley  Ventures,
Inc.,  on Form  10-QSB for the  period  ending  June 30,  2003 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the
undersigned, B. Stephen Bailey, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.