alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 213 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 213

  Designating the week of May 19 through May 25, 2019, as ``National 
                          Public Works Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 16, 2019

    Mr. Inhofe (for himself and Ms. Harris) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Designating the week of May 19 through May 25, 2019, as ``National 
                          Public Works Week''.

Whereas public works infrastructure, facilities, and services are of vital 
        importance to the health, safety, and well-being of the people of the 
        United States;
Whereas public works infrastructure, facilities, and services could not be 
        provided without the dedicated efforts of public works professionals, 
        including engineers and administrators, who represent State and local 
        governments throughout the United States;
Whereas public works professionals design, build, operate, and maintain the 
        transportation systems, water infrastructure, sewage and refuse disposal 
        systems, public buildings, and other structures and facilities that are 
        vital to the people and communities of the United States; and
Whereas understanding the role that public infrastructure plays in protecting 
        the environment, improving public health and safety, contributing to 
        economic vitality, and enhancing the quality of life of every community 
        of the United States is in the interest of the people of the United 
        States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the week of May 19 through May 25, 2019, as 
        ``National Public Works Week'';
            (2) recognizes and celebrates the important contributions 
        that public works professionals make every day to improve--
                    (A) the public infrastructure of the United States; 
                and
                    (B) the communities that public works professionals 
                serve; and
            (3) urges individuals and communities throughout the United 
        States to join with representatives of the Federal Government 
        and the American Public Works Association in activities and 
        ceremonies that are designed--
                    (A) to pay tribute to the public works 
                professionals of the United States; and
                    (B) to recognize the substantial contributions that 
                public works professionals make to the United States.
                                 <all>
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

AUDAY J. HIDMI

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 22

- 540

[ December 15, 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; Caroline Shepherd , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502019CF00 69 43AXXXMB

.

Jonathan E. Jordan of Rier/Jordan, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alexandra A. Folley,

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

K LINGENSMITH

, C.J., W ARNER and G ERBER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### § 90.3 Participation by faith-based organizations.

The funds provided under this part shall be administered in compliance with the standards set forth in part 38 (Equal Treatment for Faith-based Organizations) of this chapter.

[Order No. 2703-2004, 69 FR 2841, Jan. 21, 2004]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v. RUBEN GOVEA BARAJAS,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 14

- 102 47

D.C. No. 2:13

- cr
- 00233

- TLN

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 10, 2015 **

Before: FARRIS, WARDLAW, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges

.
Ruben Govea Barajas appeals from the district court’s judgment following
his guilty

- plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute
methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm

.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

M AR 18 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 14

- 10247

Govea Barajas challenges the district court’s order denying his motion for
appointment of new counsel claiming that the district court’s inquiry into the

attorney

- client relationship was inadequate and that he had lost trust in his
appointed counsel. The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying
Govea Barajas’s request for new counsel. See United St ates v. Mendez

- Sanchez , 563 F.3d 935, 942 (9th Cir. 2009). Govea Barajas’s request for new counsel
midway through the sentencing hearing was untimely, and the record reflects that
the district court’s inquiry allowed it to make an informed decision , and t hat there
were no “striking signs” of an extensive or irreconcilable conflict between Govea
Barajas and appointed counsel. See id. at 942

- 44.

AFFIRME D.
cc: Hon. Nancy L. Allf, District Judge Salvatore C. Gugino, Settlement Judge Cutter Law Firm, Chtd. Snell & Wilmer, LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2
(0) I 947A 

### e.)
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 193 

Designating May 18, 2019, as ‘‘Kids to Parks Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2019 

Mr. WYDEN (for himself, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. PORTMAN, Ms. 

HIRONO, and Mr. HEINRICH) submitted the following resolution; which 

was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating May 18, 2019, as ‘‘Kids to Parks Day’’. 

Whereas the 9th annual Kids to Parks Day will be celebrated 

on May 18, 2019; 

Whereas the goals of Kids to Parks Day are— 

(1) to promote healthy outdoor recreation and environmental stewardship; 

(2) to empower young people; and 

(3) to encourage families to get outdoors and visit 

the parks and public land of the United States; 

Whereas, on Kids to Parks Day, individuals from rural and 

urban areas of the United States can be reintroduced to 

the splendid national, State, and neighborhood parks located in their communities; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 193 ATS 

Whereas communities across the United States offer a variety 

of natural resources and public land, often with free access, to individuals seeking outdoor recreation; 

Whereas the people of the United States, young and old, 

should be encouraged to lead more healthy and active 

lifestyles; 

Whereas Kids to Parks Day is an opportunity for families to 

take a break from their busy lives and come together for 

a day of active, wholesome fun; and 

Whereas Kids to Parks Day will— 

(1) broaden an appreciation for nature and the outdoors in young people; 

(2) foster a safe setting for independent play and 

healthy adventure in neighborhood parks; and 

(3) facilitate self-reliance while strengthening communities: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates May 18, 2019, as ‘‘Kids to 

3 Parks Day’’; 

4 (2) recognizes the importance of outdoor recre5 ation and the preservation of open spaces to the 

6 health and education of the young people of the 

7 United States; and 

8 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

9 to observe Kids to Parks Day with appropriate pro10 grams, ceremonies, and activities. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### Abraham Fine v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Spring Valley  Management
Corp.,  on Form  10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the
undersigned, B. Stephen Bailey, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Mrs. James B. Martin, Appellee, v. Jacob Glos et al., On Appeal of Jacob Glos, Appellant.

Gen. No. 15,120.

*Injunctions—what essential to maintain, restraining issuance of ■tax deed.*In a bill to restrain the issuance of a tax deed in which the ownership of the real estate which forms the subject-matter of the suit is alleged and denied, it is essential in order that an' injunction issuing upon such bill be sustained, that the evidence establish such allegation of ownership..

Bill for injunction. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Eton. Oscab E. Heabd, Judge, presiding. Heard in this 'court :at the March term, 1909.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed May 19, 1910.

John R. O’Connor, for appellant.

No appearance by appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appellee instituted a suit, from the final decree in which Jacob Glos prosecutes this appeal. Appellee has failed to appear and defend against this appeal.

The bill filed by appellee seeks to enjoin the County Clerk of Cook county from issuing, and appellant Glos from receiving, a tax deed conveying certain real estate in Cook county theretofore sold for non-payment of certain taxes. A temporary injunction was granted in accord with the prayer of the bill, which upon final hearing was made permanent.

A material averment of the bill is that appellee was the owner of the real estate the subject-matter of the suit; that her husband took the title in his name and afterwards conveyed the property to her. This averment is put in issue by the answer of Glos. It appears that .appellee resided at Sioux City in the State of Iowa, and her deposition in support of her bill was taken at that place. She testified that she bought the *557property in July, 1896; that title was taken in the name of her husband, James Martin; that in 1902 James Martin conveyed the property to her; that she had the deed in her possession, which deed she attached to her deposition as Exhibit A. An examination of Exhibit A discloses that it is in form a warranty deed from S. Maria Jones and Samuel A. Jones, her husband, to James Martin, conveying the premises described in the bill and final decree.

The difficulty here is of the same character found to be inherent in Bauer v. Glos, 236 Ill. 450. It was there held indispensable to the right to maintain the hill that the complainant prove title in herself, and that without such proof the relief prayed could not be granted. Appellee averred title in herself and proved by deed that the title was vested in her husband, James Martin. While for some purposes husband and wife are treated as a unit, that doctrine cannot he extended to the ownership of real estate in the teeth of averment and proof to the contrary. For failure to sustain the averment of ownership, the hill should have been dismissed. Numerous decisions of our Supreme Court will be found in harmony with the doctrine of the Bauer case *supra.*

For the error indicated the decree of the Circuit Court is reversed and the cause remanded.

• *Reversed and remanded.*
### §450rr–6. Disclaimer of extraterritorial sovereignty

By enactment of sections 450rr to 450rr–6 of this title, the United States does not assert sovereignty, or sovereign or exclusive rights or jurisdiction over, or the ownership of, any marine areas or the R.M.S. Titanic.

(Pub. L. 99–513, §8, Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 2084.)
### §460z–11. Area review; report to the President; wilderness designation

Within three years from March 23, 1972, the Secretary shall review the area within the boundaries of the recreation area and shall report to the President, in accordance with section 1132(b) and (d) of this title, his recommendation as to the suitability or nonsuitability of any area within the recreation area for preservation as a wilderness, and any designation of any such area as a wilderness shall be accomplished in accordance with section 1132(b) and (d) of this title.

(Pub. L. 92–260, §13, Mar. 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 102.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1132(b) and (d) of this title, the first time appearing in text, was in the original "subsections 3(b) and 3(d) of the Wilderness Act" and, the second time appearing in text, was in the original "said subsection of the Wilderness Act".
EXHIBIT 10.7

                                    AGREEMENT

Domain Name Trust, Inc.

and

Go Health.Md, Inc.


It is agreed  that Domain Name  Trust,  Inc will  register  300 names in the .md
registrty  during the period Jan 01,2000-Dec  31,2000 for a cost of $99 for each
name registered. All rights will accrue to these names, including web hosting.

Payment shall be made on the following terms.
$10,500 payable on Nov 16, 1999.
$64 to be paid by credit card at the time each name is registered.

Any names  reserved and not  registered and paid will be void after December 31,
1999.

Renewal costs of $299 will apply on the first  anniversary and all anniversaries
thereafter.

November 16, 1999

/s/ John D. Harris                          ___________________
------------------------------------------
John D Harris, President                    Witness
Domain Name Trust, Inc.

/s/ Leonard Vernon                          ___________________
---------------------------------------
Leonard Vernon, President                   Witness
Go Health.MD, Inc.

                                      218
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

Washington, D.C. 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 93041 / September 16, 2021

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension of trading 

in the securities of the following issuer, commencing at 9:30 a.m. EDT on September 17, 2021 

and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EDT on September 30, 2021:

 Online Disruptive Technologies, Inc. (ONDR)

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of the foregoing company due 

to a lack of current and accurate information about the company because it has not filed certain 

periodic reports with the Commission. This order was entered pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act).

The Commission cautions brokers, dealers, shareholders and prospective purchasers that they 

should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available 

information and any information subsequently issued by this company.

Brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11, at 

the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered relating to the securities 

of the subject company unless and until the broker or dealer has strictly complied with all of the 

provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is required by the rule, it 

should refrain from entering quotations relating to the securities of this company that has been 

subject to a trading suspension until such time as it has familiarized itself with the rule and is 

certain that all of its provisions have been met. Any broker or dealer with questions regarding

the rule should contact the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, DC 

at (202) 551-5777. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation which is in violation of the rule,

the Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement action. 

If any broker, dealer or other person has any information which may relate to this matter, they 

should immediately communicate it to the Delinquent Filings Branch of the Division of 

Enforcement at (202) 551-5466, or by e-mail at DelinquentFilings@sec.gov.
#### In the Matter of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated et al., Appellants, v Martha Priscilla Graef, as Executrix of Robert L. Graef, Deceased, Respondent.

[823 NYS2d 387]

*221Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marilyn Shafer, J.), entered September 21, 2005, which granted respondent’s cross motion to confirm an arbitration award of compensatory damages in the amount of $148,000, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Petitioners have not established that the award was the product of fraud, misconduct or any partiality on the part of any of the arbitrators; that the arbitrators exceeded their authority in any way; that the arbitration was procedurally defective; or that the award was irrational or violative of a strong public policy *(see Hackett v Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy,*86 NY2d 146, 154-155 [1995]). Moreover, insofar as petitioners argue that the award was in manifest disregard of applicable law, it is well settled that such an award may not be vacated for errors of law or fact committed by the arbitrators *(see Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc.,*6 NY3d 471, 479 [2006], *cert dismissed*— US —, 165 L Ed 2d 1012 [2006]; *Matter of New York City Tr. Auth. v Transport Workers’ Union of Am., Local 100, AFL-CIO,*6 NY3d 332, 336 [2005]).

Petitioners further maintain that the award must be vacated because one of the three arbitrators failed to disclose that he had once been counsel to clients who had not prevailed in an arbitration proceeding against petitioner brokerage firm, speculating that this motivated him to avenge his loss in that matter by voting for the award herein. However, not only was the decision by the panel in the present matter unanimous, but there was no relationship between such arbitrator and either client herein, and no evidence of any bias by this arbitrator, who had no financial interest in the proceeding *(see Matter of Weinrott [Carp],*32 NY2d 190, 201 [1973]; *Lucent Tech. Inc. v Tatung Co.,*379 F3d 24, 28 [2d Cir 2004]). Indeed, there is no “per se rule requiring vacatur of an award whenever an undisclosed relationship is discovered” *(id.*at 30).

We have considered petitioners’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Tom, J.E, Mazzarelli, Andrias, Sweeny and Malone, JJ.
Case 16-33413-KLP Doc 19 Filed 08/08/16 Entered 08/08/16 14:16:02 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 15
Case 16-33413-KLP Doc 19 Filed 08/08/16 Entered 08/08/16 14:16:02 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 15
Case 16-33413-KLP Doc 19 Filed 08/08/16 Entered 08/08/16 14:16:02 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 15
Case 16-33413-KLP Doc 19 Filed 08/08/16 Entered 08/08/16 14:16:02 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 15
Case 16-33413-KLP Doc 19 Filed 08/08/16 Entered 08/08/16 14:16:02 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 15
Case 16-33413-KLP Doc 19 Filed 08/08/16 Entered 08/08/16 14:16:02 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 15
Case 16-33413-KLP Doc 19 Filed 08/08/16 Entered 08/08/16 14:16:02 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 15
Case 16-33413-KLP Doc 19 Filed 08/08/16 Entered 08/08/16 14:16:02 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 15
Case 16-33413-KLP Doc 19 Filed 08/08/16 Entered 08/08/16 14:16:02 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 15
Case 16-33413-KLP Doc 19 Filed 08/08/16 Entered 08/08/16 14:16:02 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 15
Case 16-33413-KLP Doc 19 Filed 08/08/16 Entered 08/08/16 14:16:02 Desc Main

 Document Page 11 of 15
Case 16-33413-KLP Doc 19 Filed 08/08/16 Entered 08/08/16 14:16:02 Desc Main

 Document Page 12 of 15
Case 16-33413-KLP Doc 19 Filed 08/08/16 Entered 08/08/16 14:16:02 Desc Main

 Document Page 13 of 15
Case 16-33413-KLP Doc 19 Filed 08/08/16 Entered 08/08/16 14:16:02 Desc Main

 Document Page 14 of 15
Case 16-33413-KLP Doc 19 Filed 08/08/16 Entered 08/08/16 14:16:02 Desc Main

 Document Page 15 of 15
Exhibit 32.1

Certification  Pursuant  To 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  As Adopted  Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Liska Biometry,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lam Ko Chau, Chief
Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  to my best  knowledge  and belief,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


By:   /s/ Lam Ko Chau
   --------------------------
      Lam Ko Chau
      President and CEO


Dated:  May 13, 2004

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Fish Hatchery

Mexican Spotted Owl =

‘), Fish Hatchery

~
‘ow

Desert Sucker

~
ww
Desert Sucker

3

Tonto National Forest j
Supervisor's Office a
1 Mar 2010

0000.1 02 03 04
a Miles

Legend
[__] Treatment Sites

Mexican Spotted Owl PACs
Mexican Spotted Owl Critical Habitat
ኣብ ሰብ ዝበዝሐሉ ቦታ

እንትኾኑ ኣፍንጫኦምን

ኣፎምን ዝሽፍን ናይ ገፅ

ኽዳን ይግበሩ። ካብ ካልኦት

ሰባት ድማ እንተኽኢልኩም

(እንተንኢሱ 6 ፊት) ረሓቑ።

ኣእዳውኩም ብዙሕ ጊዜ

ብማይን ሳሙናን ተሓጸቡ።

ሳሙናን ማይን ምርካብ

ዘይትኽእሉ እንተኾይንኩም

ድማ፣ ኣልኮል ዘለዎ ናይ

ኢድ ሳኒታይዘር ተጠቐሙ።

ናይ ጉንፋዕ ክታበት ምርካብ

ኣዝዩ ኣገዳሲ ዝኾነነገር

እዩ። ዝዕድሚኡ 6 ወርሒን

ልዕሊኡን ዝኾነ ኩሉ ሰብ ናይ

ጉንፋዕ ክታበት በቢ ወቕቱ

ክወስድ ኣለዎ። 

ስራሕኩም ወሳኒ እዩ!

ዓርስኹምን ካልኦት ሰባትን ኣብዚ ቀውዒን ሓጋይን እዚ ካብ

ጉንፋዕን COVID-19 ሓልዉ፡

ማስክ ግበሩ። ኣእደውኩም

ተሓጸቡ

ናይ ጉንፋዕ

ክታበት ርኸቡ

ዝበለጸ ሓበሬታ ኣብ

cdc.gov/flu ርኸቡ።

CS319348-AB

ናይ ጉንፋዕ ክታበት ንዓኹም፣ ፈተውትኹምን፣ መሳርሕቲታትኩምን ካብ

ጉንፋዕ ይሕልወኩም። እንተሓሚምኩም ኣብ ገዛኹም ብምጽናሕ እውን

ነዞም ምሳኹም ዘለዉ ሰባት ምሕላው ትኽእሉ።