alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.17

                                Promissory Note

                             San Diego, California

Date: April 15, 1999

Loan Amount: $ 50,000.00

For value received, the undersigned jointly and severally promises to pay to the
order of Innovative Global Solution, Inc., the sum of $ 50,000.00 (Fifty
Thousand Dollars), with interest at the rate of 8% per annum on the unpaid
balance.

Said sum shall be payable in the manner following:

     $ 50,000.00 plus interest due October 30,1999.

The undersign shall have the right to prepay without penalty. In the event any
payment due hereunder is not made when due, the entire balance shall be
immediately due at the option of the holder.

In the event of default, The undersigned agrees to pay all reasonable attorney
fees and costs of collection.



__________________
William Son
# C_2012073EN.01001101.xml

| 10.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/11

---

Order of the Court of 26 October 2011 — Fernando Marcelino Victoria Sánchez v European Parliament, European Commission

(Case C-52/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Action for failure to act - Letter addressed to the Parliament and Commission - Response - Decision to take no further action - Appeal manifestly unfounded and manifestly inadmissible)

2012/C 73/18

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Fernando Marcelino Victoria Sánchez (represented by: P. Suarez Plácido, abogado)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: N. Lorenz, N. Görlitz and P. López-Carceller, Agents), European Commission (represented by: I. Martínez del Peral and L. Lozano Palacios, Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 November 2010 in Case T-61/10 Victoria Sánchez v Parliament and Commission, by which the General Court dismissed an action seeking a declaration that the European Parliament and the European Commission failed to act, in so far as they unlawfully abstained from responding to the letter of 6 October 2009 sent by the appellant, an application for an injunction and a request for protective measures

Victoria Sánchez

Parliament and Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Victoria Sánchez is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Victoria Sánchez is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 103, 2.4.2011.

1

---
### SUBCHAPTER IV—HUNTING AND CONSERVATION STAMP TAX
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Harvey Electronics, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended October 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Franklin C. Karp,
Chief Executive Officer and President, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
     of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









/s/ Franklin C. Karp
--------------------
Franklin C. Karp
Chief Executive Officer and President
January 28, 2005




<PAGE>
### §4502. Tropical deforestation assessment and assistance

In support of the Tropical Forestry Action Plan and to specifically address tropical deforestation and degradation, the Secretary may—

(1) support and actively participate in global and regional meetings that seek to reform such Plan;

(2) together with the United States Agency for International Development,1 and other Federal agencies, provide technical assistance to tropical countries for the formulation of national forestry sector development strategies; and

(3) cooperate with tropical countries on research, training, and technical programs aimed at implementing national forestry sector development strategies.

(Pub. L. 101–513, title VI, §603, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 2071.)

1 So in original. The comma probably should not appear.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 22 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 22

Condemning the terrorist attack in Nairobi, Kenya on January 15, 2019, 
and offering sincere condolences to all of the victims, their families 
                 and friends, and the people of Kenya.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 17, 2019

     Mr. Coons (for himself and Mr. Young) submitted the following 
  resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Condemning the terrorist attack in Nairobi, Kenya on January 15, 2019, 
and offering sincere condolences to all of the victims, their families 
                 and friends, and the people of Kenya.

Whereas, on January 15, 2019, attackers launched a 19-hour siege on the 14 
        Riverside complex and Dusit D2 hotel complex in Nairobi, Kenya, opening 
        fire and detonating suicide bombs;
Whereas at least 21 people were killed, and many others were injured or remain 
        unaccounted for;
Whereas, among those killed was Jason Spindler, a United States citizen;
Whereas the Somalia-based extremist group al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for 
        the attack;
Whereas the United States has a deep and abiding interest in the security and 
        stability of Kenya, a key partner to the United States in the war on 
        terror; and
Whereas respect for human rights, due process, and the rule of law is essential 
        to the success of any counterterrorism strategy: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) condemns the horrific attack on the 14 Riverside 
        complex and Dusit D2 hotel complex in Nairobi, Kenya;
            (2) expresses its deepest condolences to the victims of 
        this attack and their families and friends;
            (3) wishes a quick recovery to all who were injured;
            (4) expresses solidarity with the people of Kenya;
            (5) stands with the Government of Kenya as it works to 
        combat violent extremism;
            (6) urges the United States Government to take the 
        necessary actions to help the Government of Kenya investigate 
        the attack and swiftly bring the perpetrators of this attack to 
        justice;
            (7) calls upon the United States Government and 
        international partners to continue to support efforts to 
        improve Kenya's crisis response management, and to train and 
        equip Kenyan security forces to respond to violent extremism; 
        and
            (8) upholds its commitment to fight and defeat terrorism.
                                 <all>
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MARCUS T. HOSTZCLAW

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 1472

[ July 26, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Jeffrey J. Colbath

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502011CF003931A

.

Marcus T. Hostzclaw, Sanderson, pro se

.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER

, C.J., F ORST and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### § 20.30 Applicability.

The provisions of this subpart of the regulations apply to the III System and the FIRS, and to duly authorized local, state, tribal, federal, foreign, and international criminal justice agencies to the extent that they utilize the services of the III System or the FIRS. This subpart is applicable to both manual and automated criminal history records.
Stewart D. Gregg, Senior Securities Counsel
Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America
5701 Golden Hills Drive
Minneapolis, MN  55416
(763) 765-2913

April 25, 2008

Board of Directors

Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America
5701 Golden Hills Drive
Minneapolis, MN  55416

Re:    Opinion and Consent of Counsel
       Allianz Life Variable Account B

Dear Sir or Madam:

You have requested my Opinion of Counsel in connection with the filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, of Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 to the Registration Statement on
Form N-4 for the Individual Deferred Variable Annuity Contracts to be issued by
Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America and its separate account,
Allianz Life Variable Account B File No. 333-139701.

I am of the following opinions:

1.  Allianz Life Variable Account B is a unit investment trust as that term is
    defined in Section 4(2) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the Act), and
    is currently registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
    pursuant to Section 8(a) of the Act.
2.  Upon the acceptance of purchase payments made by a Contract Owner pursuant
    to a Contract issued in accordance with the Prospectus contained in the
    Registration Statement and upon compliance with applicable law, such a
    Contract Owner will have a legally-issued, fully-paid, non-assessable
    contractual interest under such Contract.

You may use this opinion letter, or copy hereof, as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement.

I consent to the reference to me and to this opinion under the caption "Legal
Opinions" contained in the Statement of Additional Information which form a part
of the Registration Statement.

Sincerely,

ALLIANZ LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA

BY: /S/ STEWART D. GREGG
Stewart D. Gregg
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Richard D. Smith, certify that:

1.    I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Hathaway Corporation (the "registrant");

2.    Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.    Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

Date:
September 26, 2002

|/s/ Richard D. SmithRichard D. Smith Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer |  |  |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 
|                                                                                         |  |  |  | 

---



QuickLinks
##### 



Exhibit 12.01
 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE CO.
 COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND EARNINGS
TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
 YTD
    
    YTD
    
    YTD
    
    YTD
    
    YTD(In millions)
    
    12/31/07
    
    12/31/06
    
    12/31/05
    
    12/31/04
    
    12/31/03Earnings
    
    
    908
    
    
    
    834
    
    
    
    1,116
    
    
    
    1,012
    
    
    
    794Add:Fixed chargesInterest expense
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Interest factor attributable to rentals
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    4
    
    
    
    5
    
    
    
    6
    
    
    
    6Total fixed charges
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    4
    
    
    
    5
    
    
    
    6
    
    
    
    6Interest credited to contractholders
    
    
    1,924
    
    
    
    1,706
    
    
    
    1,679
    
    
    
    1,658
    
    
    
    1,055Total fixed charges including interest
credited to contractholders
    
    
    1,926
    
    
    
    1,710
    
    
    
    1,684
    
    
    
    1,664
    
    
    
    1,061Earnings, as defined
    
    
    910
    
    
    
    838
    
    
    
    1,121
    
    
    
    1,018
    
    
    
    800Earnings, as defined, including interest
credited to contractholders
    
    
    2,834
    
    
    
    2,544
    
    
    
    2,800
    
    
    
    2,676
    
    
    
    1,855Fixed chargesFixed charges above
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    4
    
    
    
    5
    
    
    
    6
    
    
    
    6Dividends on subsidiary preferred stock
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Total fixed charges and preferred dividend
requirements
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    4
    
    
    
    5
    
    
    
    6
    
    
    
    6Total fixed charges, interest credited to
contractholders and preferred dividend
requirements
    
    
    1,926
    
    
    
    1,710
    
    
    
    1,684
    
    
    
    1,664
    
    
    
    1,061RatiosEarnings, as defined, to total fixed charges
    
    
    455.0
    
    
    
    209.5
    
    
    
    224.2
    
    
    
    169.7
    
    
    
    133.3Earnings, as defined, to total fixed
charges and preferred dividend requirements
    
    
    455.0
    
    
    
    209.5
    
    
    
    224.2
    
    
    
    169.7
    
    
    
    133.3Earnings, as defined, including interest
credited to contractholders, to total fixed
charges including interest credited to
contractholders
    
    
    1.5
    
    
    
    1.5
    
    
    
    1.7
    
    
    
    1.6
    
    
    
    1.7Earnings, as defined, including interest
credited to contractholders, to total fixed
charges including interest credited to
contractholders and preferred dividend
requirements
    
    
    1.5
    
    
    
    1.5
    
    
    
    1.7
    
    
    
    1.6
    
    
    
    1.7
REGION 6

ORDER

Return to List of Orders

R6-lll0.ll

April 30, 2002

ACTING REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR - ORDER OF SUCCESSION

I. PURPOSE. This Order establishes the line ofsuccession to the position ofRegional

Administrator, in Region 6. It is intended to ensure that the Region has an Acting Regional

Administrator during those times that the Regional Administrator is absent from the Regional

Office.

2. POLICY.

a. ORDER OF SUCCESSION

(I) Deputy Regional Administrator

(2) Assistant Regional Administrator for Management

(3) Director, Superfund Division

(4) Director, Compliance Assurance and Enforcement Division

(5) Director, Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division

(6) Director, Water Quality Protection Division

(7) Director, Office of External Affairs

b. CORRESPONDENCE. When it is necessary that correspondence or other documents be

signed during the absence ofthe Regional Administrator, the acting official is authorized to sign

his/her name, thus executing the document. It is the responsibility ofthe acting official to keep

the regional Administrator informed of all documents signed in his/her absence. All documents

to be signed by the acting official will be brought to the Executive Mail Office where they will

be logged, reviewed and brought to the Regional Administrator's office for a signature.

3. SUPERSESSION. This Order is effective immediately. Regional Order R6-1110.10 is

hereby superseded.

/s/ L~ -;. (for)

Gregg A. Cooke

Regional Administrator
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LILLY BELLA, LLC and CHAROSALYN LUDDEN,

Appellants,

v.

IGOR SIVOKOZOV,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-0952

[February 29, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Marina Garcia-Wood, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

CACE21005174.

Kathy L. Houston of Prime Law Group, Jupiter, for appellants.

Peter J. Solnick of Solnick Law P.A., North Miami Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, LEVINE and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### § 1240.1 Purpose.

This part establishes requirements and procedures governing the allocation of funds to States made under 23 U.S.C. 157(c), based on seat belt use rates.
### §1421b. Stranding or entanglement response agreements

#### (a) In general

The Secretary may enter into an agreement under section 1382(c) of this title with any person to take marine mammals under section 1379(h)(1) of this title in response to a stranding or entanglement.

#### (b) Required provision

An agreement authorized by subsection (a) shall—

(1) specify each person who is authorized to perform activities under the agreement;

(2) specify any terms and conditions under which a person so specified may delegate that authority to another person; and

(3) include a description of the data management and public outreach policy established under section 1421a(f) of this title.

#### (c) Review

The Secretary shall periodically review agreements under section 1382(c) of this title that are entered into pursuant to this subchapter, for performance adequacy and effectiveness.

(Pub. L. 92–522, title IV, §403, formerly title III, §303, as added Pub. L. 102–587, title III, §3003(a), Nov. 4, 1992, 106 Stat. 5061; renumbered title IV, §403, Pub. L. 103–238, §24(b), Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 565; amended Pub. L. 117–263, div. J, title CIV, §10402(a), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3983.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–263, §10402(a)(1), inserted "or entanglement" before "response" in section catchline.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 117–263, §10402(a)(2), inserted "or entanglement" after "stranding".

Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 117–263, §10402(a)(3), added par. (3).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TERRYL DOMINIC MCFARLAND,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 54 WM 2020

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of August, 2020, the “Petition for Review & for an 

Interlocutory Appeal by Permission” is DENIED.
### §459f–4. Hunting and fishing provisions

The Secretary shall permit hunting and fishing on land and waters under his control within the seashore in accordance with the appropriate State laws, to the extent applicable, except that the Secretary may designate zones where, and establish periods when, no hunting or fishing shall be permitted for reasons of public safety, administration, fish or wildlife management or public use and enjoyment: Provided, That nothing in sections 459f to 459f–11 of this title, shall limit or interfere with the authority of the States to permit or to regulate shellfishing in any waters included in the national seashore: Provided further, That nothing in said sections shall add to or limit the authority of the Federal Government in its administration of Federal laws regulating migratory waterfowl. Except in emergencies, any regulations of the Secretary pursuant to this section shall be put into effect only after consultation with the appropriate State agency responsible for hunting and fishing activities. The provisions of this section shall not apply to the Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge.

(Pub. L. 89–195, §5, Sept. 21, 1965, 79 Stat. 826.)
§ 1317.300 Admission. ( a ) *General.* No person shall, on the basis of sex, be denied admission, or be subjected to discrimination in admission, by any recipient to which §§ 1317.300 through 1317.310 apply, except as provided in §§ 1317.225 and 1317.230.
( b ) *Specific prohibitions.* ( 1 ) In determining whether a person satisfies any policy or criterion for admission, or in making any offer of admission, a recipient to which §§ 1317.300 through 1317.310 apply shall not: ( i ) Give preference to one person over another on the basis of sex, by ranking applicants separately on such basis, or otherwise;
( ii ) Apply numerical limitations upon the number or proportion of persons of either sex who may be admitted; or
( iii ) Otherwise treat one individual differently from another on the basis of sex.
( 2 ) A recipient shall not administer or operate any test or other criterion for admission that has a disproportionately adverse effect on persons on the basis of sex unless the use of such test or criterion is shown to predict validly success in the education program or activity in question and alternative tests or criteria that do not have such a disproportionately adverse effect are shown to be unavailable.
( c ) *Prohibitions relating to marital or parental status.* In determining whether a person satisfies any policy or criterion for admission, or in making any offer of admission, a recipient to which §§ 1317.300 through 1317.310 apply: ( 1 ) Shall not apply any rule concerning the actual or potential parental, family, or marital status of a student or applicant that treats persons differently on the basis of sex;
( 2 ) Shall not discriminate against or exclude any person on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, termination of pregnancy, or recovery therefrom, or establish or follow any rule or practice that so discriminates or excludes;
( 3 ) Subject to § 1317.235(d), shall treat disabilities related to pregnancy, childbirth, termination of pregnancy, or recovery therefrom in the same manner and under the same policies as any other temporary disability or physical condition; and
( 4 ) Shall not make pre-admission inquiry as to the marital status of an applicant for admission, including whether such applicant is “Miss” or “Mrs.” A recipient may make pre-admission inquiry as to the sex of an applicant for admission, but only if such inquiry is made equally of such applicants of both sexes and if the results of such inquiry are not used in connection with discrimination prohibited by these Title IX regulations.
#### § 115.262 Agency protection duties.

When an agency learns that a resident is subject to a substantial risk of imminent sexual abuse, it shall take immediate action to protect the resident.