alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:23-cv-00131-JSR Document 117 Filed 11/21/23 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:23-cv-00131-JSR Document 117 Filed 11/21/23 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:23-cv-00131-JSR Document 117 Filed 11/21/23 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:23-cv-00131-JSR Document 117 Filed 11/21/23 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:23-cv-00131-JSR Document 117 Filed 11/21/23 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:23-cv-00131-JSR Document 117 Filed 11/21/23 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:23-cv-00131-JSR Document 117 Filed 11/21/23 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:23-cv-00131-JSR Document 117 Filed 11/21/23 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:23-cv-00131-JSR Document 117 Filed 11/21/23 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:23-cv-00131-JSR Document 117 Filed 11/21/23 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:23-cv-00131-JSR Document 117 Filed 11/21/23 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:23-cv-00131-JSR Document 117 Filed 11/21/23 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:23-cv-00131-JSR Document 117 Filed 11/21/23 Page 13 of 13
§ 73.1 Definition of terms. ( a ) The term *agent* means all individuals acting as representatives of, or on behalf of, a foreign government or official, who are subject to the direction or control of that foreign government or official, and who are not specifically excluded by the terms of the Act or the regulations thereunder.
( b ) The term *foreign government* includes any person or group of persons exercising sovereign de facto or de jure political jurisdiction over any country, other than the United States, or over any part of such country, and includes any subdivision of any such group or agency to which such sovereign de facto or de jure authority or functions are directly or indirectly delegated. Such term shall include any faction or body of insurgents within a country assuming to exercise governmental authority whether such faction or body of insurgents has or has not been regarded by the United States as a governing authority.
( c ) The term *prior notification* means the notification letter, telex, or facsimile must be received by the addressee named in § 73.3 prior to commencing the services contemplated by the parties.
( d ) When used in 18 U.S.C. 951(d)(1), the term *duly accredited* means that the sending State has notified the Department of State of the appointment and arrival of the diplomatic or consular officer involved, and the Department of State has not objected.
( e ) When used in 18 U.S.C. 951(d) (2) and/or (3), the term *officially and publicly acknowledged and sponsored* means that the person described therein has filed with the Secretary of State a fully-executed notification of status with a foreign government; or is a visitor, officially sponsored by a foreign government, whose status is known and whose visit is authorized by an agency of the United States Government; or is an official of a foreign government on a temporary visit to the United States, for the purpose of conducting official business internal to the affairs of that foreign government; or where an agent of a foreign government is acting pursuant to the requirements of a Treaty, Executive Agreement, Memorandum of Understanding, or other understanding to which the United States or an agency of the United States is a party and which instrument specifically establishes another mechanism for notification of visits by agents and the terms of such visits.
( f ) The term *legal commercial transaction,* for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. 951(d)(4), means any exchange, transfer, purchase or sale, of any commodity, service or property of any kind, including information or intellectual property, not prohibited by federal or state legislation or implementing regulations.
% Food exposure

% Once daily oral exposure, dose from cpfs SS F13_49 foodonly exp distribution.csv 99.9th percentile

% Female adult, Body weight set to 72.9 kg

% Cecilia Tan

% August 25, 2015

prepare @clear @all

% Setting model parameters

start @NoCallback

use human_parameters_MRP

use preg_female_parameters

BWSW=1;% Set to 1 if BWT is provided

BWST=72.9;% Initial BW in kg

PREG=0;% Not pregnant

TSTOP= 1008; % Exposure duration in hrs

%Single daily oral exposure

DT = xlsRead("Food.xls", "999p", "A1:A43"); % Dosing Times

DORAL=xlsRead("Food.xls", "999p", "B1:B43"); % Dose in ug/kg

prepare time rbcce cv urinetcpy

start@nocallback

% Output RBC AChE, urine TCpy, venous blood conc of chlorpyrifos, in ug/L

mytable = [_time _rbcce _urinetcpy _cv*350.6];

save mytable @file='food_999.txt' @format=ascii

min(_rbcce)% display peak RBC AChE inhibition
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Administrative Proceedings Rulings

Release No. 6831 / September 21, 2021

Administrative Proceeding

File No. 3-20454

In the Matter of

Kimberly D. Butler,

Prosperity Economics Partners, 

LLC, and

Partners for Prosperity, LLC

Order Directing Corrections 

to the Prehearing Conference 

Transcript

A prehearing conference in this proceeding took place September 8, 2021. 

I ORDER that the following corrections be made to the transcript of the 

hearing:

Page/Line Original Text Corrected Text

3:7 through respondents, 

Kimberly D. Butler,

three respondents, Kimberly 

D. Butler,

3:12 so, let me start with 

appearance of counsel.

so, let me start with 

appearances of counsel.

4:5 if any, disgorgement and 

prejudgment interests

if any, disgorgement and 

prejudgment interest

4:17–18 that, but it’s alj@sec.gov. 

Just to comply with the 

Commission’s filing rules. 

But

that, but it’s alj@sec.gov. 

You’ll still need to comply 

with the Commission’s filing 

rules, but

8:15 disposition/oppositions due 

14 days before the

disposition oppositions due 

14 days before the

14:5–6 when they see this record, 

I’ll just say that the record, 

there’s a worldwide 

pandemic going

when they see this record, 

I’ll just say that for the 

record, there’s a worldwide 

pandemic going
2

Page/Line Original Text Corrected Text

19:2–4 Well, if we get to hearing 

and we have an expert 

testify, I will rely on expert 

report as the expert’s direct 

testimony. And

Well, if we get to a hearing 

and we have an expert 

testify, I will rely on the 

expert report as the expert’s 

direct testimony. And

21:2 seven years ago. And if you 

do look on Nexis.

seven years ago. And if you 

do look on Lexis

24:12 issue a file on order 

memorializing everything

issue a follow-on order 

memorializing everything

I direct the court reporter to implement the above changes and issue a 

complete, amended transcript for the prehearing conference held on September 

8, 2021. The amended transcript should also be provided in electronic format 

to my office.

/s/ James E. Grimes

Administrative Law Judge
### §450bb–1. Administration

The property acquired under the provisions of section 450bb of this title shall constitute the Harpers Ferry National Historical Park and shall be a public national memorial commemorating historical events at or near Harpers Ferry. The Director of the National Park Service under the direction of the Secretary, shall have the supervision, management, and control of such national historical park, and shall maintain and preserve it for the benefit and enjoyment of the people of the United States, subject to the provisions of the Act of August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535), entitled "An Act to establish a National Park Service, and for other purposes",1 as amended.

(June 30, 1944, ch. 328, §2, 58 Stat. 646; Pub. L. 88–33, May 29, 1963, 77 Stat. 52; Pub. L. 108–307, §3, Sept. 24, 2004, 118 Stat. 1134.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Act of August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535), entitled "An Act to establish a National Park Service, and for other purposes", referred to in text, is act Aug. 25, 1916, ch. 408, 39 Stat. 535, known as the National Park Service Organic Act, which enacted sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 of this title and provisions set out as a note under section 100101 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs. Sections 1 to 4 of the Act were repealed and restated as section 1865(a) of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and section 100101(a), chapter 1003, and sections 100751(a), 100752, 100753, and 102101 of Title 54 by Pub. L. 113–287, §§3, 4(a)(1), 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3094, 3260, 3272. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables. For disposition of former sections of this title, see Disposition Table preceding section 100101 of Title 54.

#### Amendments

2004—Pub. L. 108–307 substituted "Secretary" for "Secretary of the Interior" in second sentence.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Words "national historical park" substituted in text for "national monument" in view of redesignation of Harpers Ferry National Monument as Harpers Ferry National Historical Park by Pub. L. 88–33, classified to section 450bb–6 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

1 See References in Text note below.
#### § 65.81 General definitions.

As used in this part:

*Assistance* means any actions taken by a State or local government directly relating to aiding the Attorney General in the administration of the immigration laws of the United States and in meeting urgent demands arising from the presence of aliens in the State or local government's jurisdiction, when such actions are taken to assist in meeting an immigration emergency or under any of the circumstances specified in section 404(b)(2)(A) of the INA. Assistance may include, but need not be limited to, the provision of large shelter facilities for the housing and screening of aliens, and, in connection with these activities, the provision of such basic necessities as food, water clothing, and health care.

*Immigration emergency* means an actual or imminent influx of aliens which either is of such magnitude or exhibits such other characteristics that effective administration of the immigration laws of the United States is beyond the existing capabilities of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) in the affected area or areas. Characteristics of an influx of aliens, other than magnitude, which may be considered in determining whether an immigration emergency exists include: the likelihood of continued growth in the magnitude of the influx; an apparent connection between the influx and increases in criminal activity; the actual or imminent imposition of unusual and overwhelming demands on law enforcement agencies; and other similar characteristics.

*Other circumstances* means a situation that, as determined by the Attorney General, requires the resources of a State or local government to ensure the proper administration of the immigration laws of the United States or to meet urgent demands arising from the presence of aliens in a State or local government's jurisdiction.
THE GOVERNOR 

Mr. Kevin Schlemmer 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVP,N!A 

OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR 

HARRISBURG 

July17,2014 

United States Department of Transportation 

400 Seventh St s:w., Suite 6401 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Mr. Schlemmer: 

D 01_ orT-2-oOJ-I'fs-Z-~ 

0 a;~ 0 rt/' 1111- 25-z 3 

I am vvriting to exp.ress my support for the waiver process regarding Essential Air Service at both 

Franklin's Venango County Regional Airport ~;;nd Bradford Regional Airport. On April24, the U.S. Department 

of Transportation issued Order 20 14·-4~26 proposing to eliminate subsidized service at these two markets due to 

a low number of enplanements (iess than 10 per senrice day) during the time period from October 1, 2012 

through September 309 2013. 

My administration has been a supporter of air service development that creates jobs in Pennsylvania, 

improves commerce and strengthem:. the state's overall economy. Both PennDOT and the Pennsylvania 

.Department of Community and Economic Develop~ent have' engaged in programs that support Pennsylvania 

~~. ; 

For nearly three years, the air service development communities and Pittsburgh International Airport 

have invested a significant amount of money toward studying problems regarding current air service. They 

have identified a viable solution that improves passenger traffic and allows both communities to fully satisfy 

EAS minimums such as the 1 0 enpianement rule and the $200 subsidy per passenger rule. This iniiiative has 

resulted in the addition ofthree new carriers applying' for bids to PIT with greater frequency, reduced costs and 

a strong model of efficiency. 

\ I appreciate the opportunity to express my support for the waiver process for Franklin's Venango 

County Airport and Bradford Regional Airport, as well as the contributions that PIT has brought to the entire 

program. 

Sincerely, .. 

~~' .. TOM CORBETT 

Governor
§ 625.2 Policy. ( a ) Plans and specifications for proposed National Highway System (NHS) projects shall provide for a facility that will— ( 1 ) Adequately serve the existing and planned future traffic of the highway in a manner that is conducive to safety, durability, and economy of maintenance; and
( 2 ) Be designed and constructed in accordance with criteria best suited to accomplish the objectives described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section and to conform to the particular needs of each locality.
( b ) Resurfacing, restoration, and rehabilitation (RRR) projects shall be constructed in accordance with standards that preserve and extend the service life of highways and enhance highway safety. Resurfacing, restoration, and rehabilitation work includes placement of additional surface material and/or other work necessary to return an existing roadway, including shoulders, bridges, the roadside, and appurtenances to a condition of structural or functional adequacy.
( c ) An important goal of the FHWA is to provide the highest practical and feasible level of safety for people and property associated with the Nation's highway transportation systems and to reduce highway hazards and the resulting number and severity of accidents on all the Nation's highways.
[62 FR 15397, Apr. 1, 1997, as amended at 87 FR 40, Jan. 3, 2022]
### §4412. Limitation on assessments against Migratory Bird Conservation Fund

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, only those personnel and administrative costs directly related to acquisition of real property shall be levied against the Migratory Bird Conservation Account.1

(Pub. L. 101–233, §14, Dec. 13, 1989, 103 Stat. 1977.)

1 So in original. Probably should be "Fund". See section 718d of this title.
# FILED
Novemb er 19, 1997 Cecil W. Crowson Ap pellate Cou rt Clerk 

## IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE MIDDLE SECTION AT NASHVILLE

GARY W. PHELPS, ) ) Plaintiff /Appella nt, )

) Davidson Chancery ) No. 95-1892-III VS. ) ) Appeal N o. ) 01A01-9603- CH-00103 TENNESSE

E BOARD OF PAROLES, ) ET AL., ) ) Defenda nts/Appell ees. )



## O R D E R
The Tennesse e Board of

Paroles has filed a

petition for rehe aring pointing out that this court’s October 22, 1997 opinion relies upon outdated regulatio ns. We have determ ined that th e moti on is well- taken. Itis, ther efore, ordered t

hat this cou

rt’s opi nion filed o n October 22, 1997 be and is hereby

withdraw n and repla

ced with t he opinion fi led contem

poraneousl y with this order. ENTE R, this ___

___ day of Novem

ber, 1997.

______ _____________

_____________

_ HENRY F. TODD, PRES IDING JU DG E MIDDLE SECTION

___________

_________________

__ __ _ SAMUEL L. LEWIS, JUDGE

_________________

_ _____________

_ _ WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ALEJANDRO HERNANDEZ,

 

 Appellant,

v.

ALBERTO ENRIQUE HERNANDEZ 

AND REYNALDO AARON MORALES,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00060-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 7

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2017-CCV01809)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third motion for extension of time within which to 

file the brief until July 6, 2019. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Alejandro Hernandez, pro se, prepare the Appellant’s brief 

and forward the same to this Court on or before July 6, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of June, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
#### § 61.4 Major federal action.

The NEPA regulations define “major federal action.” “Major federal action” does not include action taken by the Department of Justice within the framework of judicial or administrative enforcement proceedings or civil or criminal litigation, including but not limited to the submission of consent or settlement agreements and investigations. Neither does “major federal action” include the rendering of legal advice.
§ 4.11 Appearance; testimony; cross-examination. ( a ) The applicant shall appear and, except as otherwise provided in § 4.10, shall testify at the hearing and may cross-examine witnesses.
( b ) The Secretary and others to whom notice has been sent pursuant to § 4.7 shall be afforded an opportunity to appear and present evidence and cross-examine witnesses, at any hearing.
( c ) In the discretion of the Commission or presiding officer, other witnesses may testify at the hearing.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 96-4714

IVAN L. HAIRSTON,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.

Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge.

(CR-92-85)

Submitted: May 15, 1997

Decided: June 4, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Bruce A. Flora, Boones Mill, Virginia, for Appellant. Robert P.

Crouch, Jr., United States Attorney, Joseph W. H. Mott, Assistant

United States Attorney, Tracy Taylor, Third Year Law Intern, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Ivan L. Hairston was convicted of drug and firearm offenses,

including using or carrying a firearm during and in relation to a drug

trafficking offense in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (1994). He was

sentenced to a term of 147 months imprisonment. Following the

Supreme Court's decision in Bailey v. United States, ___ U.S. ___,

64 U.S.L.W. 4039 (U.S. Dec. 6, 1995) (Nos. 94-7448/7492), Hairston

filed a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.

1997), seeking to have his § 924(c) conviction vacated. The government agreed that the conviction should be vacated.

The district court then resentenced Hairston on the remaining

counts, adding an enhancement for possession of a firearm during a

drug offense. United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines

Manual, § 2D1.1(b)(1) (Nov. 1995). Hairston objected to the

enhancement, arguing that the court lacked jurisdiction to resentence

him for convictions which he had not challenged and that a sentence

enhancement violated double jeopardy. The district court overruled

his objection and sentenced him to a term of 108 months imprisonment. Hairston appeals, alleging constitutional error and contending

that the district court erred in failing to hear evidence concerning the

guideline enhancement. Finding no error, we affirm.

We recently decided the issue raised here in United States v.

Hillary, 106 F.3d 1170 (4th Cir. 1997), holding that the district court

has jurisdiction to resentence a defendant on a surviving drug conviction after he has been granted relief from a § 924(c) conviction in

light of Bailey. Moreover, in response to an inquiry from the district

court, Hairston's attorney conceded that the enhancement applied.

We therefore affirm the sentence. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

 2
EXHIBIT 10.13

                            UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

$75,000                                                     Miami Beach, Florida
                                                               November 24, 1999

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned promises to pay to the order of YUPI
INTERNET INC. and/or assigns, the principal sum of Forty Thousand dollars
($75,000) together with interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum,
until maturity, said payment to be in one lump sum of principal and interest for
Forty three thousand two hundred dollars ($81,000), lawful money of the United
States of America is due on November 24, 2000.

This note shall be repayable in whole or in part at any time without penalty.
This note may not be assumed without the consent of YUPI INTERNET INC.

Each maker and endorser severally waives demand, protest and notice of maturity,
non-payment or protest and all requirements necessary to hold each of them
liable as makers and endorsers.

Each maker and endorser further agrees, jointly and severally, to pay all costs
of collection, including a reasonable attorney's fee in case the principal of
this note and the interest thereon is not paid at the maturity date, or in case
it becomes necessary to protect the security thereof, whether suit be brought or
not.

/S/  VICTOR GUTIERREZ
-------------------------
By Victor Gutierrez