alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
 31



CERTIFICATION
 OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AS
 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I,Nora
 Coccaro certify that:   1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q (Report)
 ofASP Ventures Corp.;

2.
 Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
 necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
 respect to the period covered by this Report;    3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
 information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
 flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this Report;    4. I am responsible for establishing and
 maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and
 have:

a)Designed
 such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
 ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to me by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;



b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
 controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation;and



c)
 Disclosed in this Report any
 change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
 fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
 reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. I
 have disclosed based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the
 audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)All
 significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
 other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.



Date:
 May14, 2008



/s/
 Nora Coccaro

Nora
 Coccaro

Chief Executive
 Officer and Chief Financial Officer

25
O rder issued O ctober 6 , 20 2 2

.

In The


## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 22

- 00 71 6

- CV

IN RE ROBERT CARTER HIGLEY , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 189th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021

- 32442



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before this court is an emergency motion filed by relator Robert Carter Higley

to instruct the trial court to stay all proceedings relating to discovery of attorney communications until this mandamus p roceeding is resolved . After considering the motion, this court hereby temporarily stays all proceedings relating to discovery of attorney communications, including the trial court’s show cause hearing scheduled
for October 10, 2022, pending resolution of relator ’ s motion. Real party in interest Robert Allen Higley is directed to file a response to the motion within 7 days of the

date of this order.2 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Bourliot, and Hassan.
#### The People of the State of New York on Complaint of Estelle Damsky, Respondent, v. Julius Cohen, Appellant.

Motion denied upon condition that appellant serve his ease, place the same on the next calendar, and be ready for argument when reached; otherwise, motion granted. Present— Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Rich and Stapleton, JJ.
#### William C. Robinson, Administrator, Defendant in Error, v. Louis A. Kraft, Plaintiff in Error, and Henry Hudson, Trustee, et al., Defendants in Error.

Gen. No. 5233.

This case is controlled by the decision in Robinson v. Kraft, *ante,*p. 213.

Bill in chancery. Error to the Circuit Court of Lake county; the Hon. Chables H. Donnelly, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1909.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed March 11, 1910.

G. J. George and Alonzo Hope, for plaintiff in error.

Edward J. Heydecker and Elam L. Clarke, for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Thompson

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case is a suit in chancery between the same parties as No. 5232, to foreclose a mortgage given to secure a note for $2,000. The note and mortgage are of the same date and the mortgage is on the same premises as that in No. 5232. The cases.were heard on the same evidence. The same questions are argued by the same counsel, the briefs and arguments in both cases are identical. The opinion in the preceding case is decisive of this case. *Ante,*p. 213. The decree is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
Native American 

NA1.1 Thank you for your commen
Native American 

NA2.1 Thank you for your commen
EXHIBIT 99.1

UNDERTAKINGS

For the purposes of complying with the amendments to the rules governing Form S-8 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act"), the Registrant hereby
undertakes as follows, which undertaking shall be incorporated by reference into Registrant's Statement on Form S-8 Nos. 333-04273 (filed May 22, 1996); 333-175155 (filed December 2, 1996); 333-41447
(filed December 4, 1997); 333-92531 (filed December 10,1999); 333-36252 (filed May 4, 2000); 333-04273 (filed July 21, 2000); and 333-72906 (filed November 7, 2001):



---

QuickLinks
December 4, 2009

Mr. Vincent Camobreco U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Ariel Rios Building 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20460 Submitted electronically

Subject: FASOM Sensitivity Analysis to Distillers Grains Assumptions

Dear Vince,

As you are aware, distillers grains from corn ethanol pl ants can have a significant impact on the net amount of land required to produce corn for ethano l and other markets. FASOM, the model used by EPA to estimate domestic land use changes for the RFS2 analysis, assumes that 1 lb of distillers gr ains replaces 1 lb of feed, where the replaced

feed is 0.915 lbs of corn and 0.085 lbs of soybean meal. Our comments on the proposed rule show that, based on information from the feed industry, nutritionists and Argonne National Laboratory, the replacement rates are higher than assumed in FASOM.

We carefully examined the proposed RFS2 rule for any evidence that EPA evaluated FASOM’s predictions of corn and soybean meal production and their sensitivity to the distillers grains feed replacement assumptions, but found no sensitivity analyses. Therefore, we asked Air Improvement Resource, Inc. (AIR) to run sensitivity analysis of FASOM results to three di fferent DG input assumptions, as follows:

3⁄4 “Default” DG assumptions (same as EPA)

3⁄4 “Zero DGs” (i.e., DGs do not replace feed at all)

3⁄4 “RFA DGs” (i.e., DGs replace corn and soybean meal at rates recommended by Prof. Gerald Shurson, University of Minnesota)

The results of this analysis are shown in the attached briefing slides. Basically, there are three findings from this analysis:

1. The model shows that DG use does redu ce land devoted to soybeans, and also reduces soybean production.

2. The model shows that DG use does redu ce land devoted to corn, but for some unidentifiable reason, does not reduce corn production.3. The model does not reduce corn and soyb ean acreage in response to increased DG displacement to the degree our external calculations suggest should reasonably

occur. The reasons for this are not clear.

Since DGs have a significant effect on net land use for corn ethanol, we think these FASOM modeling issues should be carefully examined by EPA before finalizing

the RFS2. While the directional effects of increasing DG substitution inside the FASOM model appear correct, the magnitude of th e effects appears grossly understated. The reasons for this should be investigated. Base d on the apparent gross understatement of the land impact of increasing DG substitution, it appears the FASOM m odel may possibly be flawed in how it translates changes in DG substitution rates into acreage impacts.

If you have any questions on our analysis, we would be glad to meet with you to go over these results.

Respectfully yours,

Geoff Cooper VP, Research & Analysis
§ 83.605 Award. *Award* means an award of financial assistance by the Department of Justice or other Federal agency directly to a recipient. ( a ) The term award includes: ( 1 ) A Federal grant or cooperative agreement, in the form of money or property in lieu of money.
( 2 ) A block grant or a grant in an entitlement program, whether or not the grant is exempted from coverage under the Governmentwide rule 28 CFR Part 70 that implements OMB Circular A-102 (for availability, see 5 CFR 1310.3) and specifies uniform administrative requirements.
( b ) The term award does not include: ( 1 ) Technical assistance that provides services instead of money.
( 2 ) Loans.
( 3 ) Loan guarantees.
( 4 ) Interest subsidies.
( 5 ) Insurance.
( 6 ) Direct appropriations.
( 7 ) Veterans' benefits to individuals (*i.e.,* any benefit to veterans, their families, or survivors by virtue of the service of a veteran in the Armed Forces of the United States).
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Aurizon Mines Ltd. (the Company) is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report).

I, Ian S. Walton, Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:



(i)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/ Ian S. Walton
|-----------------
|                 

Ian S. Walton 
Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer

March 31, 2011



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Aurizon Mines Ltd. and will be retained by Aurizon Mines Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §460ppp–5. No buffer zones

The Congress does not intend for the establishment of the conservation area to lead to the creation of protective perimeters or buffer zones around the conservation area. The fact that there may be activities or uses on lands outside the conservation area that would not be permitted in the conservation area shall not preclude such activities or uses on such lands up to the boundary of the conservation area consistent with other applicable laws.

(Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(4) [div. B, title I, §125 [§7]], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–229, 2763A–356.)
December 15, 2015



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KELVIN GOLD , Appellant

NO. 14

- 15

- 00123

- CV V.

HELIX ENERGY SOLUTIO NS GROUP, INC.

, Appellee

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc., signed, January 8, 2015, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore order the judgment of the court below REVERSED and REMAND the cause for proceedings in accordance with the court's opinion.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellee, Helix Energy Sol utions Group, Inc..

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
**** 

**Exhibit 23**

 

Consent of Independent Registered

Public Accounting Firm

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Great Northern Iron Ore Properties of our reports dated February 18, 2010, with respect to the financial statements of Great Northern Iron Ore Properties, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Great Northern Iron Ore Properties, included in the 2009 Annual Report to Certificate Holders of Great Northern Iron Ore Properties.

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

 

Minneapolis, Minnesota

February 18, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

----
### §460ffff–4. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction

Administrative jurisdiction over the approximately 56 acres of Federal land depicted on the Map as "USFS Transfer to BLM" is transferred from the Forest Service to the Bureau of Land Management.

(Pub. L. 103–433, title XIV, §1405, as added Pub. L. 116–9, title I, §1441, Mar. 12, 2019, 133 Stat. 710.)
EE-RM-93-501 COMMENT 0A
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

MICHAEL EARL YELLOW,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-10140

D.C. No. 3:11-cr-08173-NVW-1

ORDER OF DISMISSAL*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Neil V. Wake, District Judge, Presiding

Argued August 10, 2015

Submitted August 25, 2015 

San Francisco, California

Before: KOZINSKI and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges and PIERSOL,** Senior

District Judge.

 

FILED

SEP 01 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States Senior District

Judge for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation.

 
The Government has renewed its motion to dismiss the pending appeal

based on the fugitive disentitlement doctrine. See Dkt. No. 18. We rely on the

publicly filed declarations. See Dkt. No. 47. Considering a warrant from over a

year ago remains outstanding for Yellow’s arrest, his whereabouts are still

presently unknown, the U.S. Marshals are actively looking for him and he has not

been found in his usual and customary places, and his pattern of failing to report to

his probation officer and follow the terms of his supervised release—the fugitive

disentitlement doctrine applies here. See Ortega-Rodriguez v. United States, 507

U.S. 234, 239-42 (1993); Williams v. Alameida, 511 F.3d 973 (9th Cir. 2007). 

Therefore, we GRANT the Government’s motion to dismiss, and we

conditionally dismiss Yellow’s appeal pursuant to the fugitive disentitlement

doctrine. If within 30 days Yellow submits himself to the U.S. Marshals, he may

move to reinstate this appeal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2
### §460ww. Establishment

#### (a) In general

In order to protect and preserve the scenic, recreational, geological, and fish and wildlife resources of the Gauley River and its tributary, the Meadow River, there is hereby established the Gauley River National Recreation Area (hereinafter in this Act referrred 1 to as the "recreation area").

#### (b) Area included

The recreation area shall consist of the land, waters, and interests therein generally depicted on the boundary map entitled "Gauley River National Recreation Area", numbered NRA–GR/20,000A and dated July 1987 and on the boundary map depicting the Meadow River, numbered WSR–MEA/20,000A and dated July 1988. The map shall be on file and available for public inspection in the offices of the National Park Service, Department of the Interior.

#### (c) Boundary modifications

Within five years after October 26, 1988, the Secretary of the Interior (hereinafter in this subchapter referred to as the "Secretary") shall submit to the Committee on Natural Resources of the United States House of Representatives and to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the United States Senate a report containing any boundary modifications which the Secretary recommends, together with the reasons therefor.

(Pub. L. 100–534, title II, §201, Oct. 26, 1988, 102 Stat. 2702; Pub. L. 103–437, §6(d)(21), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4584.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 100–534, Oct. 26, 1988, 102 Stat. 2699, known as the West Virginia National Interest River Conservation Act of 1987, which enacted this subchapter and sections 410eeee–12 to 410eeee–15 of this title, amended sections 410eeee–1 and 1274 of this title, and enacted provisions set out as notes under sections 410eeee–1 and 1274 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1988 Amendment note set out under section 410eeee–1 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1994—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 103–437 substituted "Natural Resources" for "Interior and Insular Affairs" after "Committee on".

1 So in original. Should be "referred".
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.8.13



                    Schedule of Directors Receiving Options

o    Vint Cerf
o    Gregory Reyes, Jr.
o    Joel Smith
o    Frederico Faggin
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 381 

Designating October 26, 2019, as the ‘‘Day of the Deployed’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 24, 2019 

Mr. HOEVEN (for himself, Mr. TESTER, Mr. PETERS, Ms. WARREN, Mr. 

DAINES, and Mr. ISAKSON) submitted the following resolution; which was 

considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating October 26, 2019, as the ‘‘Day of the 

Deployed’’. 

Whereas more than 2,100,000 individuals serve as members 

of the Armed Forces of the United States; 

Whereas several hundred thousand members of the Armed 

Forces rotate each year through deployments to more 

than 150 countries in every region of the world; 

Whereas more than 2,000,000 members of the Armed Forces 

have deployed to the area of operations of the United 

States Central Command since the September 11, 2001, 

terrorist attacks; 

Whereas the United States is kept strong and free by the 

loyal military personnel from the total force, which is 

comprised of the regular components, the National 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 381 ATS 

Guard, and the Reserves, who protect the precious heritage of the United States through their declarations and 

actions; 

Whereas the United States remains committed to providing 

the fullest possible accounting for personnel missing from 

past conflicts ranging from World War II through current day conflicts; 

Whereas members of the Armed Forces serving at home and 

abroad have courageously answered the call to duty to 

defend the ideals of the United States and to preserve 

peace and freedom around the world; 

Whereas the United States remains committed to easing the 

transition from deployment abroad to service at home for 

members of the Armed Forces and the families of the 

members; 

Whereas members of the Armed Forces personify the virtues 

of patriotism, service, duty, courage, and sacrifice; 

Whereas the families of members of the Armed Forces make 

important and significant sacrifices for the United 

States; and 

Whereas the Senate has designated October 26 as the ‘‘Day 

of the Deployed’’ since 2011: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates October 26, 2019, as the ‘‘Day 

3 of the Deployed’’; 

4 (2) honors the deployed members of the Armed 

5 Forces of the United States and the families of the 

6 members; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 381 ATS 

1 (3) calls on the people of the United States to 

2 reflect on the service of those members of the Armed 

3 Forces, wherever the members serve, past, present, 

4 and future; and 

5 (4) encourages the people of the United States 

6 to observe the Day of the Deployed with appropriate 

7 ceremonies and activities. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 21


SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT:

                                                 Where
                                              Incorporated
Name                                           (or formed)

Burton Rubber Compounding, L.P.                 Delaware
  (a limited partnership)
Burton Rubber Processing, Ltd.                  Ontario
Cadillac Plastic Group, Inc.                    Michigan
CIMCO, Inc.,                                    Delaware
DH Compounding Company                          Delaware
 (a general partnership)
Erieview Insurance Company Limited              Bermuda
Enviro Care Compounds AS                        Norway
Global Processing Company                       California
Hanna France SARL                               France
Hanna Hamilton Holdings Company                 Delaware
Hanna International Corporation                 Delaware
Hanna Polimeros, S.A. de C.V.                   Mexico
Hanna Su Xing Plastics Compounding (Suzhou)
 Company Limited                                China
M. A. Hanna Export Services Company             Barbados
M. A. Hanna International Financial
 Services Company                               Ireland
M. A. Hanna de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.             Mexico
M. A. Hanna Resin Distribution Company          Delaware
M. A. Hanna Company Thermoplastic Elastomers    Delaware
MAH Plastics Company                            Delaware
Monmouth Plastics Company                       Delaware
Poliamidas Barbastro, S.A.                      Spain
Texapol Corporation                             Pennsylvania
The Ohio & Western Pennsylvania
  Dock Company                                  Ohio
The Pennsylvania Tidewater
  Dock Company                                  Delaware
Theodor Bergmann GmbH & Co.
  Kunststoffwerk KG                             Germany
Victor International Plastics, Ltd.             England
Wilson Color S.A.                               Belgium
Wilson Color GmbH                               Germany
Wilson Color S.A.                               France
Wilson Color AB                                 Sweden


      The Registrant has other unconsolidated subsidiaries and 50
percent or less owned persons accounted for by the equity method,
which   in   the  aggregate  do  not  constitute  a   significant
subsidiary.
### §460v–2. Boundaries; adjustments; publication in Federal Register

Within six months after October 1, 1968, the Secretary shall publish in the Federal Register a detailed description of the boundaries of the recreation area. Following such publication, the Secretary may make minor adjustments in the boundary of the recreation area by publication of the amended description thereof in the Federal Register: Provided, That the total acreage of the recreation area within the adjusted boundary does not exceed the acreage of the recreation area as shown on the map referred to in section 460v of this title.

(Pub. L. 90–540, §3, Oct. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 904.)
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Alex Sepos, Respondent, against Van Epps Construction Company et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

All concur.