alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 20894.

#### Marilyn Levy *v.*Julian S. Levy.

(410 P.2d 629)

Decided January 31, 1966.

Rehearing- denied February 21, 1966.

*163Salazar & DeLaney, Carl L. Harthun, for plaintiff in error.

Leo Sanders Moses, Dickerson, Morrissey & Dwyer, Frickey & Morrissey, for defendant in error.

*In Department.*

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Day.

■ We will refer to the; plaintiff in error as Marilyn and to the defendant in error as-Julian. ; -

Oh' January 29, 1962, a decree of divorce was entered in the district court in favor of Marilyn and incorporated therein was a property settlement agreement which had been worked out by the parties and their attorneys. The first agreement was signed on September 19, 1961, and seven days later the parties agreed to two addendums.

Approximately six months after entry of the decree Marilyn obtained new counsel who filed a motion to set aside the property agreements on the ground that Julian had concealed his assets and held property conjointly with his mother, concerning which Marilyn was unaware. She alleged that transfers of property were *164made to the mother and Julian jointly, without her knowledge and with intent to defraud her; and also that Julian had concealed one large bank account and another: smaller account.

After two days of hearing and testimony from nine witnesses, compiled in 930 folios, the court denied Marilyn’s petition. She is here by writ of error, asserting that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to grant her the relief sought.

 Whether a property settlement agreement was entered into by the wife under circumstances that indicate that she has been overreached and that material facts concerning her husband’s property have been deceitfully concealed from her, present questions of fact. In order for Marilyn to prevail here, she must show that the trial court abused its discretion and that the order denying her request to set aside the settlement is not supported by the evidence.

Marilyn did not prove the allegations in her motion. During the course of the hearing, at one time or another, she made admissions that she knew about all of the property and had, in fact, helped to manage most of it; and also that she knew of her mother-in-law’s interest in it. As to the bank accounts, the record reflects that she made deposits in the various accounts and had drawn a check on one of the accounts just a month and a half prior to entering into the settlement agreement. Although the evidence was in conflict as to whether she knew of the balance in the large account, the record discloses that she was aware of it.

We have repeatedly held that under well-known and oft-repeated rules, the determination of the facts by the trial court based on competent evidence is binding on this court.

The judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Sutton and Mr. Justice Frantz concur.
§ 94.101 Purpose and scope; future guidance; construction and severability; compliance date. ( a ) *Purpose and scope.* This subpart implements the provisions of VOCA, at 34 U.S.C. 20103, which, as of July 8, 2016, authorize the Director to make an annual grant to the chief executive of each State for the financial support of eligible crime victim assistance programs. VOCA sets out the statutory requirements governing these grants, and this subpart should be read in conjunction with it. Grants under this program also are subject to the government-wide grant rules in 2 CFR part 200, as implemented by the Department of Justice at 2 CFR part 2800, and the DOJ Grants Financial Guide.
( b ) *Future guidance.* The Director may, pursuant to 34 U.S.C. 20110(a), prescribe guidance for grant recipients and sub-recipients under this program on the application of this subpart.
( c ) *Construction and severability.* Any provision of this subpart held to be invalid or unenforceable by its terms, or as applied to any person or circumstance, shall be construed so as to give it the maximum effect permitted by law, unless such holding shall be one of utter invalidity or unenforceability, in which event such provision shall be deemed severable from this part and shall not affect the remainder thereof or the application of such provision to other persons not similarly situated or to other, dissimilar circumstances.
( d ) *Compliance date.* This subpart applies to all grants under this program made by OVC after August 8, 2016, except for funds that the SAA obligated before August 8, 2016 (*i.e.* pre-award funds under grants made in 2016). SAAs may permit the use of funds that are unobligated as of August 8, 2016 for activities permitted by this subpart, but not by the Guidelines.
[81 FR 44528, July 8, 2016, as amended at 88 FR 3656, Jan. 20, 2023]
U.S.Department of

Transportation Office of the Secretary OfTransportation September 9,2013 

### 1013SEPI I /A II: 51 '200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. Washington, DC 20590

Mr. Mark W. Atwood Counsel for Western Global Airlines, LLC. Cozen O'Connor 1627 I Street NW Washington, DC 20006 RE: Dockets DOT-OST-2013-0105 andDOT-OST-2013-0106 Application ofWestern Global Airlines, LLC for certificates ofpublic convenience andnecessity to engage ininterstate and foreign charter cargo airtransportation Dear Mr. Atwood: We have completed our initial review ofthe information you filed onMay 14, 2013 onbehalf of Western Global Airlines, LLC, ("Western"), for the determination of its fitness to operate interstate and foreign charter cargo air transportation. We have determined that we will need additional and/or clarifying information before we may complete our review. I ask that you respond fully to ourrequest within 30days ofthe date ofthis letter.
1. Exhibit WG-7 ofWestern's application states that fuel, loading and ground handling is generally prepaid for by clients. However, page 8 ofits application states that these costs are 'generally on a short term reimbursement basis". Please clarify how Western intends to handle the costs for fuel, loading, and ground handling, Ifthe costs are to be prepaid, please provide a copy of a standard customer contract or similar proof that these costs will beprepaid, Additionally, please provide aforecast that clearly reflects this. 2, Western's application states thatNordic Global andWestern Global intend to share its dispatch and ops center. Where isthis center located? 3. Where isthe main airport Western intends tobase itself?
As is the Department's practice; further processing of Western's application will be deferred pending receipt ofthis information. In addition, please remember that Western should promptly provide the Department with any information regarding changes it may undergo in areas affecting its fitness (i.e., management, operating plans or financial condition, compliance disposition, orownership) while its application isunder review bythe Department.2

Ifyou have any questions regarding this letter orthe requested information, please contact me at (202) 366-9998. Sincerely,

Catherine .T. O'Toole Analyst, Air Carrier Fitness Division Office ofAviation Analysis

cc: Docket DOT-OST-2013-0105 Docket DOT-OST-2013-0106 Mr. William Royal, FAA Principal Operations Inspector Tampa Flight Standards District Oftice
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 204 

To return to the President of the United States the Arms Trade Treaty. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 13, 2019 

Mr. PAUL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Relations 

EXECUTIVE 

RESOLUTION 

To return to the President of the United States the Arms 

Trade Treaty. 

Whereas, on April 29, 2019, President Donald J. Trump 

transmitted the following to the United States Senate: ‘‘I 

have concluded that it is not in the interest of the United 

States to become a party to the Arms Trade Treaty 

(Senate Treaty Doc. 114–14, transmitted December 9, 

2016). I have, therefore, decided to withdraw the aforementioned treaty from the Senate and accordingly request that it be returned to me.’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate shall re2 turn to the President of the United States the Arms Trade 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 204 IS 

1 Treaty, Done at New York on April 2, 2013 (Treaty Doc. 

2 114–14). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
§ 76.34 Record of hearings. ( a ) *General.* Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, a verbatim written record of all hearings shall be kept. All evidence upon which the Judge relies for decision shall be contained in the transcript of testimony, either directly or by appropriate reference. All exhibits introduced as evidence shall be marked for identification and incorporated into the record. Upon completion of the transcript, the transcript shall be filed by the official court reporter with the Judge, who will notify the parties. Transcripts may be obtained by the parties and the public from the official court reporter of record. Unless otherwise ordered by the Judge, any fees in connection therewith shall be the responsibility of the parties.
( b ) *Corrections.* Corrections to the official transcript will be permitted upon motion. Motions for corrections must be submitted within ten (10) days of the service by the Judge of the notice of the filing of the transcript, or such other time as may be permitted by the Judge. Corrections of the official transcript will be permitted only when errors of substance are involved and only upon approval of the Judge.
( c ) The record of the proceedings shall consist of the notices, pleadings, motions, rulings, exhibits, orders, the findings, decisions or opinions of the Judge, the stipulations and briefs, and the transcript(s) of the hearing(s).
CS 317547-A 06/22/2020

cdc.gov/coronavirus

RESTAURANT AND BARS FOLLOW THESE 5 SAFETY STEPS

to keep us all healthy

 STAY HOME IF YOU DON’T FEEL WELL

or if you tested positive for COVID-19 or

were exposed to someone with COVID-19 in 

the last 14 days 

 COVER YOUR COUGHS AND SNEEZES

with your elbow or a tissue and throw the 

tissue away, and wash your hands

 WASH YOUR HANDS OFTEN WITH SOAP 

AND WATER 

for at least 20 seconds, especially before, 

during, and after preparing food and after 

handling garbage 

CLEAN AND DISINFECT FREQUENTLY 

TOUCHED SURFACES

WEAR A CLOTH FACE COVERING 

when possible, especially when social 

distancing is difficult

1

2

3

4

5

like door handles, cash registers, chairs, 

tables, countertops, condiment holders, and 

bathroom stalls
### §410vv–1. Establishment

#### (a) In general

There is established as a unit of the National Park System the Marsh-Billings-Rockefeller National Historical Park in Windsor County, Vermont (hereinafter in this subchapter referred to as the "park").

#### (b) Boundaries and map

(1) The park shall consist of a historic zone, including the Marsh-Billings-Rockefeller Mansion, surrounding buildings and a portion of the area known as "Mt. Tom", comprising approximately 555 acres, and a protection zone, including the areas presently occupied by the Billings Farm and Museum, comprising approximately 88 acres, all as generally depicted on the map entitled "Marsh-Billings-Rockefeller National Historical Park Boundary Map" and dated November 19, 1991.

(2) The map referred to in paragraph (1) shall be on file and available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of the National Park Service, Department of the Interior.

(Pub. L. 102–350, §3, Aug. 26, 1992, 106 Stat. 934; Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(e) [title I, §143], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–231, 2681–267.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Subsecs. (a), (b)(1). Pub. L. 105–277 substituted "Marsh-Billings-Rockefeller" for "Marsh-Billings" wherever appearing.
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Harry Carl and Isidore Rosenberg et al.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
Item 14(c) - Exhibit (i) (21)


SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT:

                                                  Where Incorporated
Name                                                  (or formed)

Burton Rubber Compounding, L.P.                        Delaware
  (a limited partnership)
Burton Rubber Processing, Ltd.                         Ontario
Cadillac Plastic Group, Inc.                           Michigan
CI Holding Company                                     Delaware
Compounding Technology, Euro S.A.                      France
Compounding Technology, Inc.                           California
Compounding Technology Pte. Ltd.                       Singapore
DH Compounding Company                                 Delaware
 (a general partnership)
Enviro Care Compounds AS                               Norway
Hanna France SARL                                      France
Hanna Hamilton Holdings Company                        Delaware
Hanna International Corporation                        Delaware
Hanna Polimeros, S.A. de C.V.                          Mexico
Hanna Su Xing Plastics Compounding (Suzhou)
 Company Limited                                       China
Hanna-Wilson Polimer Feldolgozo Kft                    Hungary
Hanna Wilson Polymer (Shanghai) Limited                China
Harwick Chemical Manufacturing Company                 Delaware
M. A. Hanna Export Services Company                    Barbados
M. A. Hanna International Financial Services Company   Ireland
M. A. Hanna de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.                    Mexico
M. A. Hanna Resin Distribution Company                 Delaware
MAH Plastics Company                                   Delaware
Melos Carl Bosch GmbH & Co.                            Germany
Monmouth Plastics Company                              Delaware
Poliamidas Barbastro, S.A.                             Spain
Techmer PM, LLC                                        Delaware
The Ohio & Western Pennsylvania Dock Company           Ohio
The Pennsylvania Tidewater Dock Company                Delaware
Theodor Bergmann GmbH & Co. Kunststoffwerk KG          Germany
Victor International Plastics, Ltd.                    England
Wilson Color S.A.                                      Belgium
Wilson Color GmbH                                      Germany
Wilson Color S.A.                                      France
Wilson Color AB                                        Sweden


      The  Registrant  has  other unconsolidated  subsidiaries  and  50
percent or less owned persons accounted for by the equity method, which
in the aggregate do not constitute a significant subsidiary.
### §§450ss–6, 450ss–7. Repealed. Pub. L. 108–199, div. F, title V, §544(h), (i), Jan. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 349

Section 450ss–6, Pub. L. 105–58, §8, Oct. 9, 1997, 111 Stat. 1266, provided for disposal of site of Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building to the Trust.

Section 450ss–7, Pub. L. 105–58, §9, Oct. 9, 1997, 111 Stat. 1266, provided for General Accounting Office study.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,074

EX PARTE CLIFTON LEVON PORCHER, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 991386 IN THE 232nd DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of capital murder

and sentenced to life years’ imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction.

Porcher v. State, No. 14-05-00867-CR (Tex. App.–Houston [14 Dist.], delivered March 6, 2007, th

no pet.). 

Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel

failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed to advise him of
2

his right to petition for discretionary review pro se. We remanded this application to the trial court

for findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court

has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to timely notify

Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed to advise him of his right to petition for

discretionary appeal pro se. The trial court recommends that relief be granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956

S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity

to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of the Fourteenth Court of

Appeals in Cause No. 14-05-00867-CR that affirmed his conviction in Case No. 991386 from the

232nd Judicial District Court of Harris County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary

review with the Fourteenth Court of Appeals within 30 days of the date on which this Court’s

mandate issues.

Delivered: January 28, 2009

Do not publish
Recommended Strategies for Businesses and Employers 

The purpose of this Toolkit is to help businesses and employers fight the flu and 

to offer tips and suggestions to consider when planning and responding to the 

seasonal flu. Additional information can be found at the CDC website, 

http://www.cdc.gov/flu/business

CDC recommends two strategies this season 

for businesses and employers to help fight the flu. 

Strategy 1: Host a flu vaccination clinic in the workplace. 

To minimize absenteeism, employers frequently offer onsite seasonal flu 

vaccination to employees at no or low cost to their employees. This option can 

work well if the employer has an on-site occupational health clinic. If you don’t 

have a clinic, pharmacies and community vaccinators can be contracted to provide 

seasonal flu vaccination services on-site.

Strategy 2: Promote flu vaccination in the community. 

Make sure your employees know where they and their families can get seasonal 

flu vaccines in their community. Additionally, find out what health care providers, 

pharmacies and clinics provide seasonal flu vaccines. Partner with a pharmacy or 

provider to get your employees vaccinated.

 

Even healthy people can get the flu, and it can be serious.

Make It Your Business

To Fight The Flu

Promoting the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine
### §410fff–8. Water rights

#### (a) Effect on water rights

Nothing in this subchapter shall—

(1) constitute an express or implied reservation of water for any purpose; or

(2) affect any water rights in existence prior to October 21, 1999, including any water rights held by the United States.

#### (b) Additional water rights

Any new water right that the Secretary determines is necessary for the purposes of this subchapter shall be established in accordance with the procedural and substantive requirements of the laws of the State of Colorado.

(Pub. L. 106–76, §10, Oct. 21, 1999, 113 Stat. 1131.)
### §410iii–10. Cooperative agreements

#### (a) In general

In order to further the purposes of this subchapter, the Secretary is authorized to enter into cooperative agreements with interested public and private entities and individuals (including the National Trust for Historic Preservation, Belle Grove, Inc., the Cedar Creek Battlefield Foundation, the Shenandoah Valley Battlefields Foundation, and the Counties of Frederick, Shenandoah, and Warren), through technical and financial assistance, including encouraging the conservation of historic and natural resources of the Park.

#### (b) Technical and financial assistance

The Secretary may provide to any person, organization, or governmental entity technical and financial assistance for the purposes of this subchapter, including the following:

(1) Preserving historic structures within the Park.

(2) Maintaining the natural or cultural landscape of the Park.

(3) Local preservation planning, interpretation, and management of public visitation for the Park.

(4) Furthering the goals of the Shenandoah Valley Battlefields Foundation related to the Park.

(Pub. L. 107–373, §12, Dec. 19, 2002, 116 Stat. 3109.)
## Browse All Stories

### Delivering mni wašté to residents of Cheyenne River Reservation

[Read More]

11.30.2023

Community FacilitiesGrantsRural DevelopmentTribalWater

### Martin Family Achieves Homeownership on the St. Regis Mohawk Reservation Through Packaging Partnerships

[Read More]

07.18.2023

Tribal

### USDA Rural Development celebrates Chugachmiut Regional Health Center groundbreaking

[Read More]

06.05.2023

Community FacilitiesGrantsHealth CareInfrastructureRural DevelopmentTribalUnderserved

### Re-Building a Wastewater Treatment Facility in Rural Montana

[Read More]

04.13.2023

Community FacilitiesTribalWastewaterWater

### Routine Servicing Leads to New Projects

[Read More]

03.09.2023

Community FacilitiesEconomic DevelopmentHomeownershipHousingTribalWastewaterWater

### I was paying for something I knew I would never own

[Read More]

01.20.2023

HomeownershipHousingTribal

### Increasing Abundance with Native Communities Cooperative Development Training

[Read More]

11.30.2022

CooperativesGrantsRural DevelopmentTribalUnderserved

### Creating A Haven for Native American Homeowners

[Read More]

11.28.2022

HomeownershipHousingRural DevelopmentTribal

### ReConnecting Rural Residents to Reliable High-Speed Internet

[Read More]

10.27.2022

BroadbandInfrastructureTechnologyTelecommunicationsTribalUtilities

### Homeownership Becomes Reality Through Four Bands Community Fund, Rural Development

[Read More]

10.24.2022

HomeownershipHousingRural DevelopmentTribalUnderserved

-                Current page            1 
-                Page            2 
-                Page            3
### §2908. Other Federal assistance and actions

The Secretary and the chief executive officer of any other appropriate Federal department or agency may loan to any State such personnel and equipment of the department or agency, share such scientific or other appropriate information, and provide such other assistance as the Secretary or officer determines appropriate for purposes of assisting any State to develop or revise conservation plans.

(Pub. L. 96–366, §9, Sept. 29, 1980, 94 Stat. 1329.)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 86088 / June 11, 2019

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-17132

In the Matter of 

INFRASTRUCTURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTICE THAT INITIAL DECISION HAS BECOME FINAL

The time for filing a petition for review of the initial decision in this proceeding has 

expired. No such petition has been filed by Infrastructure International, Inc., and the 

Commission has not chosen to review the decision on its own initiative.

Accordingly, notice is hereby given, pursuant to Rule 360(d) of the Commission's Rules 

of Practice,1that the initial decision of the administrative law judge has become the final 

decision of the Commission with respect to Infrastructure International, Inc.2The order 

contained in that decision is hereby declared final. The initial decision ordered that, under 

Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registration of each class of registered 

securities of Infrastructure International, Inc., is hereby revoked. The revocation is effective as 

of June 12, 2019.

For the Commission, by the Office of the General Counsel, pursuant to delegated 

authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

 Acting Secretary

 

1

 17 C.F.R. § 201.360(d).

2

 Infrastructure Int’l, Inc., Initial Decision Release No. 1365 (Mar. 12, 2019), 2019 WL

1124073. The Central Index Key number for Infrastructure International, Inc., is: 82312.