alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

 

September 26, 2023

In the Matter of

Green Automotive Company, 

File No. 500-1

ORDER OF SUSPENSION OF 

TRADING

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Green Automotive 

Company (“GACR”)1(CIK No. 0001497632), a defaulted Nevada corporation located in 

Newport Beach, California with a class of securities registered with the Commission pursuant to 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") Section 12(g), because it is delinquent in its 

periodic filings with the Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 

10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2014. On July 14, 2023, the Commission’s Division of 

Corporation Finance (“Corporation Finance”) sent a delinquency letter to GACR requesting 

compliance with its periodic filing requirements, which was delivered. As of August 7, 2023, 

the common stock of GACR was quoted on OTC Pink Limited Tier operated by OTC Markets 

Group Inc. (formerly “Pink Sheets”), had six market makers, and was eligible for the 

“piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11(f)(3).

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors 

require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Exchange Act, that 

trading in the securities of the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. 

EDT, on September 27, 2023, through 11:59 p.m. EDT, on October 10, 2023.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman 

Secretary

1 The short form of the issuer’s name is also its stock symbol.
§ 541.5 Discipline process. ( a ) *Incident report.* The discipline process starts when staff witness or reasonably believe that you committed a prohibited act. A staff member will issue you an incident report describing the incident and the prohibited act(s) you are charged with committing. You will ordinarily receive the incident report within 24 hours of staff becoming aware of your involvement in the incident.
( b ) *Investigation.* After you receive an incident report, a Bureau staff member will investigate it. ( 1 ) *Information:* The investigator will specifically inform you: ( A ) of the charge(s) against you; and
( B ) that you may remain silent at all stages of the discipline process, but that your silence may be used to draw an adverse inference against you at any stage of the process. Your silence alone, however, cannot be the basis for finding you committed the prohibited act(s).
( 2 ) *Statement:* When the investigator asks for your statement, you may give an explanation of the incident, request any witnesses be interviewed, or request that other evidence be obtained and reviewed. However, the staff investigation of the incident report may be suspended before requesting your statement if it is being investigated for possible criminal prosecution.
( 3 ) *Informally resolving the incident report.* The incident report may be informally resolved at any stage of the disciplinary process, except for prohibited acts in the Greatest and High severity levels, or as otherwise required by law or these regulations. If the incident report is informally resolved, it will be removed from your records.
### §§192, 192a. Repealed. Pub. L. 91–412, §3(a), (b), Sept. 25, 1970, 84 Stat. 864

Section 192, acts Mar. 1, 1919, ch. 86, §1, 40 Stat. 1256; May 27, 1935, ch. 148, §2, 49 Stat. 293, which provided for deposit of moneys received for special statistical studies, compilations, and transcripts in a special account for payment of ordinary expenses incidental to the work and services of nongovernmental individuals and had originally provided for covering into the Treasury as miscellaneous receipts moneys received in payment of photographic and other mechanical reproduction of special statistical compilations from the records, is now covered by section 1526 of this title.

Section 192a, acts May 27, 1935, ch. 148, §3, 49 Stat. 293; Aug. 7, 1946, ch. 770, §1(4), 60 Stat. 866, required Secretary of Commerce to prescribe rules and regulations governing special statistical studies.
Sick with flu? Know what to do?

Know the symptoms of flu

Stay home when sick.

when sick

Stayhome

Prescribes Them!

if Your Doctor

Drugs

Take Antiviral

Knowthe

symptoms

of

flu

to do! know what

sick with flu?

when sick

Stay home 

Drugs

 

Take Antiviral

 

Know the

symptoms

of

flu 

to do! 

sick with flu?

know what

Influenza (or flu) is a contagious respiratory illness caused by flu viruses. Most people with flu have 

mild illness and do not need medical care or antiviral drugs. If you get flu symptoms, in most cases, 

you should stay home and avoid contact with others except to get medical care. 

Flu viruses can cause mild to severe illness, and 

at times can lead to death. The flu is different 

from a cold. The flu usually comes on suddenly. 

People who have flu often feel some or all of 

these symptoms: Fever* or feeling 

feverish/chills, cough, sore throat, runny or 

stuffy nose, muscle or body aches, headaches, 

fatigue (tiredness). Some people may have 

vomiting and diarrhea. This is more common 

in children. 

* It’s important to note that not everyone with

flu will have a fever.

if Your Doctor
 

Prescribes Them!
 

Antiviral drugs can be used to treat flu illness. Antiviral drugs can make illness milder and shorten the time you are sick. They also 


can prevent serious flu complications.
 

CDC recommends that antiviral drugs be used early to treat people who are very sick with the flu and people who get flu symptoms 


who are at high risk of serious flu complications, either because of their age or because they have a high risk medical condition.
 

When you are sick, limit contact with others as much as possible. Remember to cover your nose and mouth with a tissue when 

you cough or sneeze, and throw tissues in the trash after you use them. Stay home for at least 24 hours after your fever is gone 

except to get medical care or for other necessities. 

*Your fever should be gone for 24 hours without the use of a fever-reducing medicine before resuming normal activities.

www.cdc.gov/flu/takingcare.htm
UNITED STATES 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 

DIVIS ION OF 

iSTMENT MANAGEMENT 

Stephanie M. Monaco, Esq. 

Morgan, Lewis & Beckius LLP 

1800 M Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20036-5869 

Dear Ms. Monaco: 

July 28, 2000 

On June 7, 2000, we issued a no-action letter to Massachusetts Mutual Life 

Insurance Company ("MassMutual") under Section 17(d) of the Investment Company 

Act of 1940 and Rule 17d-l thereunder with respect to MassMutual's proposed 

aggregation of orders, on behalf of its proprietary account and registered investment 

companies ("funds") and certain private accounts for which it serves as investment 

adviser, for the purchase and sale of private placement securities for which it negotiates 

no term other than price. Since the issuance of the letter, we have received a number of 

inquiries regarding the scope of the no-action relief granted to MassMutual. We are 

writing to clarify that MassMutual did not request no-action relief, and we did not 

express our views, with respect to aggregated transactions in which a fund's investment 

adviser: (1) does not participate or have a material pecuniary interest in an entity that 

does participate; but (2) negotiates the terms of the private placement securities on behalf 

of the fund and other participants in the aggregated transaction which are affiliated with 

the fund. If we are requested to do so, we will address this issue separately. 

Sincerely, 

Annette 

~~p M. Capretta 

Senior Counsel
### §410eeee–9. Cooperation

The Secretary of the Army shall cooperate with the Secretary of the Interior concerning the water requirements of the national river. The Secretary of the Army shall provide for release of water from the Bluestone Lake project consistent with that project's purposes and activities in sufficient quantity and in such manner to facilitate protection of biological resources and recreational use of the national river.

(Pub. L. 95–625, title XI, §1110, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3548.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 460m–23 of this title.
(March 19, 1943.)

#### Gnilbe Corporation, Respondent, v. Wm. T. Keogh Amusement Company et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P: J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
Spread fun.

No

usly

t

sick from

F

the o

l

fu,

eri

u

g s ca et

.

E

n

ven

age

it to family, friends,

healthy kids of any pread and othe

n s

rs.

they ca

and

ld get a f u vaccine e

er shou very year.

d

E

ld

v

o

eryone 6 onths o age an m f

For more information, visit http://www.cdc.gov/flu 

CS254717L
#### John P. Bedden *v.*John M. Clark.

*Trespass—herding stock upon uninclosed land.*Where the plaintiff is in possession of land, and exercising control over the same, the driving and herding of stock upon the same, when forbidden, whether it is inclosed or not, is a trespass, and the plaintiff may recover all damages sustained by it.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Vermilion county; the Hon. Thomas F. Tipton, Judge, presiding.

Messrs. Mallory & Lindsey, for the appellant

Mr. E. W. Griggs, for the appellee.

Mr. Justice Scott

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This action was brought in trespass, before a justice of the peace, to recover damages occasioned by appellant herding his stock on uninclosed lands of appellee without his consent.

*339At the trial the court permitted appellee to read in evidence, over objection of appellant, what is called the stock ordinance of the townshipof Butler, passed in 1871. Whether it was properly admitted in evidence, or whether the court gave the correct construction to it, are not, in the view we have taken, material questions in the decision of the case.

There is no controversy as to the fact appellant did herd his stock on appellee’s land in 1872. He insists, however, it was done by the license and permission of appellee. This is denied, and the finding of the jury on all questions of fact submitted is in favor of appellee. The evidence shows appellee owned the land, had some improvements on it, and exercised such acts of dominion over it as authorized the jury to find he had possession. This being so, he could lawfully warn all persons to desist from herding stock upon it. The court very properly instructed the jury, as it did in the sixth instruction, that “stock can not be herded on a person’s land or premises without his consent, and if they are so herded, that will constitute a trespass, and the owner of said land or premises, who has possession of the same, may recover damages from the trespasser, if any were sustained.”

Were it lawful for stock to run at large in Butler township, as appellant insists it was, still that would not authorize him to herd his cattle on the land of appellee, over which he had control, when forbidden to do so. Driving stock upon the land of another, whether inclosed or not, when forbidden by the owner, would constitute a trespass, and such owner may maintain an action for the recovery of all damages sustained.

No material error appearing in the record, the judgment must be affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
§ 36.212 Insurance. ( a ) This part shall not be construed to prohibit or restrict— ( 1 ) An insurer, hospital or medical service company, health maintenance organization, or any agent, or entity that administers benefit plans, or similar organizations from underwriting risks, classifying risks, or administering such risks that are based on or not inconsistent with State law; or
( 2 ) A person or organization covered by this part from establishing, sponsoring, observing or administering the terms of a bona fide benefit plan that are based on underwriting risks, classifying risks, or administering such risks that are based on or not inconsistent with State law; or
( 3 ) A person or organization covered by this part from establishing, sponsoring, observing or administering the terms of a bona fide benefit plan that is not subject to State laws that regulate insurance.
( b ) Paragraphs (a) (1), (2), and (3) of this section shall not be used as a subterfuge to evade the purposes of the Act or this part.
( c ) A public accommodation shall not refuse to serve an individual with a disability because its insurance company conditions coverage or rates on the absence of individuals with disabilities.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

BRITTANY HANFIELD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-2813

[December 22, 2021]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Bernard I. Bober, 

Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 07-017346-CF-10A, 07-018296-CF-10A and 07-

018298-CF-10A.

Brittany Banfield, Ocala, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CONNER, C.J., GERBER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
### §2114. Administration

#### (a) In general

The Secretary shall administer this chapter in accordance with regulations that the Secretary shall develop.

#### (b) Guidelines

The regulations promulgated under this chapter shall include guidelines for the administration of this chapter at the Federal and State levels and shall identify the measures and activities that are eligible for cost sharing under this chapter.

#### (c) Existing mechanisms

Existing mechanisms shall be used to the extent possible to make payments and deliver services to the landowner under this chapter.

#### (d) Land grant universities

The Secretary, in consultation with State foresters or equivalent State officials, may provide assistance directly to other State and local natural resource management agencies and land grant universities in implementing this chapter in cases in which the State foresters or equivalent State officials are not able to make fund transfers to other State and local agencies.

(Pub. L. 95–313, §20, as added Pub. L. 101–624, title XII, §1223, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3542.)
§ 94.104 Allocation of sub-awards. ( a ) *Directed allocation of forty percent overall.* Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, each SAA shall allocate each year's VOCA grant as specified below in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section. Where victims of priority category crimes are determined to be underserved as well, an SAA may count funds allocated to projects serving such victims in either the priority category or the underserved category, but not both.
( b ) *Priority categories of crime victims (thirty percent total).* SAAs shall allocate a minimum of ten percent of each year's VOCA grant to each of the three priority categories of victims specified in the certification requirement in VOCA, at 34 U.S.C. 20103(a)(2)(A), which, as of July 8, 2016, includes victims of— ( 1 ) Sexual assault,
( 2 ) Spousal abuse and
( 3 ) Child abuse.
( c ) *Previously underserved category (ten percent total).* SAAs shall allocate a minimum of ten percent of each year's VOCA grant to underserved victims of violent crime, as specified in VOCA, at 34 U.S.C. 20103(a)(2)(B). To meet this requirement, SAAs shall identify which type of crime victim a service project assists by the type of crime they have experienced or the demographic characteristics of the crime victim, or both.
( d ) *Exceptions to required allocations.* The Director may approve an allocation different from that specified in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, pursuant to a written request from the SAA that demonstrates (to the satisfaction of the Director) that there is good cause therefor.
( e ) *Sub-award process: Documentation, conflicts of interest, and competition of funding to sub-recipients.* ( 1 ) SAAs have sole discretion to determine which organizations will receive funds, and in what amounts, subject to the requirements of VOCA, this subpart, and the provisions in the DOJ Grants Financial Guide relating to conflicts of interest. SAAs must maintain a documented methodology for selecting all competitive and non-competitive sub-recipients.
( 2 ) SAAs are encouraged to award funds through a competitive process, when feasible. Typically, such a process entails an open solicitation of applications and a documented determination, based on objective criteria set in advance by the SAA (or pass-through entity, as applicable).
( f ) *Direct-service projects run by SAAs.* An SAA may use no more than ten percent of its annual VOCA grant to fund its own direct service projects, unless the Director grants a waiver.
[81 FR 44528, July 8, 2016, as amended by at FR 3656, Jan. 20, 2023]
EXHIBIT 32.1

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of NMXS.com, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A-1 for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned principal executive officer and  the principal
financial officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

Date:  November 24, 2003

/s/ Richard Govatski
Richard Govatski, President
(Principal Executive Officer)


/s/ Teresa Dickey
Teresa Dickey, Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
§ 71.31 Determining the amount of penalties and assessments. ( a ) In determining an appropriate amount of civil penalties and assessments, the ALJ and the authority head, upon appeal, should evaluate any circumstances that mitigate or aggravate the violation and should articulate in their opinions the reasons that support the penalties and assessments they impose. Because of the intangible costs of fraud, the expense of investigating such conduct, and the need to deter others who might be similarly tempted, double damages and a significant civil penalty ordinarily should be imposed.
( b ) Although not exhaustive, the following factors are among those that may influence the ALJ and the authority head in determining the amount of penalties and assessments to impose with respect to the misconduct (i.e., the false, fictitious, or fraudulent claims or statements) charged in the complaint: ( 1 ) The number of false, fictitious, or fraudulent claims or statements;
( 2 ) The time period over which such claims or statements were made;
( 3 ) The degree of the defendant's culpability with respect to the misconduct;
( 4 ) The amount of money or the value of the property, services, or benefit falsely claimed;
( 5 ) The value of the Government's actual loss as a result of the misconduct, including foreseeable consequential damages and the costs of investigation;
( 6 ) The relationship of the amount imposed as civil penalties to the amount of the Government's loss;
( 7 ) The potential or actual impact of the misconduct upon public confidence in the management of Government programs and operations;
( 8 ) Whether the defendant has engaged in a pattern of the same or similar misconduct;
( 9 ) Whether the defendant attempted to conceal the misconduct;
( 10 ) The degree to which the defendant has involved others in the misconduct or in concealing it;
( 11 ) Where the misconduct of employees or agents is imputed to the defendant, the extent to which the defendant's practices fostered or attempted to preclude such misconduct;
( 12 ) Whether the defendant cooperated in or obstructed an investigation of the misconduct;
( 13 ) Whether the defendant assisted in identifying and prosecuting other wrongdoers;
( 14 ) The complexity of the program or transaction, and the degree of the defendant's sophistication with respect to it, including the extent of the defendant's prior participation in the program or in similar transactions;
( 15 ) Whether the defendant has been found, in any criminal, civil, or administrative proceeding to have engaged in similar misconduct or to have dealt dishonestly with the Government of the United States or of a State, directly or indirectly; and
( 16 ) The need to deter the defendant and others from engaging in the same or similar misconduct.
( c ) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the ALJ or the authority head from considering any other factors that in any given case may mitigate or aggravate the offense for which penalties and assessments are imposed.
### §§406 to 406d. Repealed. Sept. 14, 1950, ch. 950, §1, 64 Stat. 849

Sections, act Feb. 26, 1929, ch. 331, §§1–5, 45 Stat. 1314–1316, related to Grand Teton National Park of Wyoming. See section 406d–1 et seq. of this title. See, also, sections 482m and 673b, relating to Teton National Forest, and National Elk Refuge, in Wyoming, respectively.

Sections 406 to 406d were not enacted as part of act Sept. 14, 1950, ch. 950, 64 Stat. 849, which comprises this subchapter.
writ petitions challenging evidentiary rulings, as those rulings are 

discretionary" and defendant may appeal if convicted). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

Hardesty 

, • 

Parraguirre 

cc: Hon. Doug Smith, District Judge 

Clark County Public Defender 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2 

;.; SIMMININCEEMESSArerV,1;-: EMI=