alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Land Area Change and Fractional Water Maps in the Chenier Plain, Louisiana, following Hurricane Rita (2005)

1

Jacobs Technology, contracted to U.S. Geological Survey, St. Petersburg, FL, 2U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA

By Monica Palaseanu-Lovejoy,1 Christine Kranenburg,1and John C. Brock2

Scientific Investigations Map 3141

Pamphlet accompanies map

0 5 10

Kilometers

0 5 10

Kilometers

0 5 10

Kilometers

430000 440000 450000 460000

430000 440000 450000 460000

3330000 3320000 3310000 3300000 3290000

3330000 3320000 3310000 3300000 3290000

430000 440000 450000 460000

430000 440000 450000 460000

3330000 3320000 3310000 3300000 3290000

3330000 3320000 3310000 3300000 3290000 3330000 3320000 3310000 3300000 3290000

430000 440000 450000 460000

430000 440000 450000 460000

3330000 3320000 3310000 3300000 3290000

430000 440000 450000 460000

430000 440000 450000 460000

3330000 3320000 3310000 3300000 3290000

3330000 3320000 3310000 3300000 3290000

430000 440000 450000 460000

430000 440000 450000 460000

3330000 3320000 3310000 3300000 3290000

3330000 3320000 3310000 3300000 3290000

Hurricane Track

NGOM Study Area

Hurricane Rita 

September 24, 2005

100

Miles

100

Kilometers

Louisiana Mississippi Alabama

Texas Florida

0 5025

0 5025

Unchanged Water Areas (33.7%)

Unchanged Land Areas (54.3%)

New Land Areas (2.6%)

New Water Areas (9.4%)

2003

2006

Land Area Change Following 

Hurricane Rita (2005)

Suggested citation:

Palaseanu-Lovejoy, M.E., Kranenburg, C.J., and Brock, J.C., 2010, Land area change and fractional 

water maps in the Chenier Plain, Louisiana, following Hurricane Rita (2005): U.S. Geological Survey 

Scientific Investigations Map 3141, 1 sheet, 6 p. pamphlet.

See pamphlet for references cited.

Image Sources:

Landsat 7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+) satellite imagery acquired on April 17, 2003, and Landsat 

5 Thematic Mapper (TM) imagery acquired on February 12, 2006.

IKONOS and QuickBird high resolution imagery acquired on May 23, 2003, and March 25, 2006, respectively.

All imagery provided by USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center.

(The data are projected using the WGS 84 datum and the UTM Zone 15N coordinate system.)

Threshold PCC PCC Water PCC Land Kappa AUC Commission Omission

26% 98.96% 98.42% 99.52% 97.92% 99.92% 0.47% 1.58%

Threshold PCC PCC Water PCC Land Kappa AUC Commission Omission

51% 99.13% 98.73% 99.52% 98.26% 99.92% 0.52% 1.27%

U.S. Department of the Interior 

U.S. Geological Survey December 2010 Fractional Water Land/Water Classification Maximum Kappa Threshold Fractional Water Land/Water Classification Maximum Kappa Threshold

Projected using the WGS 84 datum and the UTM Zone 15N coordinate system.

Percentage Correctly Classified (PCC) Area Under the Curve (AUC)

Percentage Correctly Classified (PCC) Area Under the Curve (AUC)

Northern Gulf of Mexico (NGOM) study area showing the track of Hurricane Rita in relation to the 

land change study area of this map.

Explanation

Land

Water

100

 0

Percent Water
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-1751

___________ Marvel Jones, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Department of Correctional Services; * District of Nebraska. Harold Clarke; Frank Hopkins; Mike * Kenney; Michelle Rose; Mario Peart; * [UNPUBLISHED] Lawrence Higgins; Scott Marshall; * Jeff Bauer; Unknown Balderson, * Corporal; Unknown Edison, Corporal; * Unknown Connelly, Sergeant; * Unknown Howard, Sergeant; Unknown * Paul, Sergeant; Unknown Stoner, * Lieutenant; Unknown Naylor, * Lieutenant; Unnamed/Unidentified * Correctional Staff Members, of the * Nebraska State Penitentiary, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: June 30, 2008 Filed: August 14, 2008

___________ Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.1 The Honorable Joseph Bataillon, Chief J udge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. -2- Marvel Jones appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After carefulde novo review, see Stalley ex rel. U.S. v. Catholic Health Initiative , 509 F.3d 517, 521 (8th Cir. 2007); Mattes v. ABC Plastics, Inc. , 323 F.3d 695, 697-98 (8th Cir. 2003), we concl ude that the dismissal was proper. The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
#### § 620.102 Applicability.

The requirements of this section apply to all projects on which Federal-aid highway funds are to be expended and to both civil and military airports.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jeremiah J. KERBY, Appellant.

No. 02-1113.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 6, 2002.

Filed May 16, 2002.

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, MURPHY, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Jeremiah J. Kerby pleaded guilty to armed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d), and to using and carrying a firearm during and in relation to the bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(ii). At sentencing, the district court1 imposed an obstruction-of-justice increase and, over Mr. Kerby’s objection, denied him an acceptance-of-responsibility reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1. The court sentenced him to 151 months imprisonment for the robbery, a consecutive term of 84 months imprisonment for the gun conviction, and concurrent supervised release terms (5 and 3 years respectively). The court also ordered Kerby to pay $46,012.50 in restitution. On appeal, counsel has filed a brief and moved to withdraw under *Anders v.*
      *513
      *California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), challenging the denial of the section 3E1.1 reduction.

The district court did not clearly err. *See United States v. Ervasti,*201 F.3d 1029, 1043 (8th Cir.2000). Two -witnesses testified that Mr. Kerby threatened to harm, or solicited others to harm, a codefendant who had cooperated with the government. Further, Mr. Kerby stipulated that he had obstructed justice during the investigation of his case by destroying evidence. *See*U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, comment. (n.4) (conduct supporting obstruction enhancement ordinarily indicates defendant should not receive § 3E1.1 reduction); *United States v. Honken,*184 F.3d 961, 967-69 (8th Cir.) (district court should consider totality of circumstances), *cert. denied,*528 U.S. 1056, 120 S.Ct. 602, 145 L.Ed.2d 500 (1999). Mr. Kerby carried the burden of establishing his entitlement to the reduction, *see Honken,*184 F.3d at 968, and “the determination of the sentencing judge is entitled to great deference on review,” because “[t]he sentencing judge is in a unique position to evaluate a defendant’s acceptance of responsibility,” *see*U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, comment, (n.5).

Having reviewed the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

. The Honorable Donald E. O’Brien, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 324 

Designating September 29, 2019, as ‘‘National Urban Wildlife Refuge Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2019 

Mr. GARDNER (for himself and Mr. BENNET) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 29, 2019, as ‘‘National Urban 

Wildlife Refuge Day’’. 

Whereas over 80 percent of people in the United States live 

in or near cities, which typically have limited opportunities for residents to access nature and experience outdoor 

recreation; 

Whereas the National Wildlife Refuge System under the 

United States Fish and Wildlife Service manages 567 national wildlife refuges that constitute a national network 

of land and water managed for the conservation of fish, 

wildlife, and plants in the United States; 

Whereas national wildlife refuges provide opportunities for 

people to discover and appreciate nature; 

Whereas there is a refuge located within a 1-hour drive of 

every metropolitan area in the United States; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 324 IS 

Whereas the Urban Wildlife Conservation Program under the 

United States Fish and Wildlife Service— 

(1) focuses on introducing people living in densely 

populated areas to the more than 100 national wildlife 

refuges near urban areas; and 

(2) promotes wildlife conservation and the enjoyment 

of hunting, fishing, and other wildlife-dependent recreational activities close to where people live; 

Whereas the Urban Wildlife Conservation Program focuses 

on public-private partnerships— 

(1) to improve wildlife conservation; and 

(2) to promote access to recreation on and off national wildlife refuges, including recreational activities 

such as hunting and fishing; and 

Whereas by exploring community-centered approaches to address local needs, engaging the next generation of anglers 

and hunters, and providing infrastructure and safe access, the Urban Wildlife Conservation Program helps 

local organizations, cities, and towns across the United 

States engage in conservation activities: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates September 29, 2019, as ‘‘Na3 tional Urban Wildlife Refuge Day’’; 

4 (2) encourages the United States Fish and 

5 Wildlife Service to increase access to outdoor rec6 reational opportunities for urban communities; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 324 IS 

1 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

2 to visit and experience the more than 100 urban na3 tional wildlife refuges of the United States. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### § 1200.1 Purpose.

This part establishes uniform procedures for State highway safety programs authorized under Chapter 4, Title 23, United States Code.
### §450jj–2. Railroad agreement as condition precedent to undertaking memorial project

The memorial project authorized herein shall not be undertaken until there shall have been reached an agreement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Interior providing for the relocation of the railroad tracks and structures now situated on lands adjacent to the Jefferson National Expansion Memorial National Historic Site,1 between the boundary of the site and the river. Such agreement shall contain such terms as may be deemed desirable by the Secretary but shall contain a provision limiting the Federal expenditure of funds in connection with such relocation of the tracks and structures to work undertaken within the historic site area.

(May 17, 1954, ch. 204, §3, 68 Stat. 99.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Herein, referred to in text, means act May 17, 1954, which is generally classified to sections 450jj to 450jj–9 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Jefferson National Expansion Memorial redesignated Gateway Arch National Park by Pub. L. 115–128, §2, Feb. 22, 2018, 132 Stat. 328, which is classified to section 450jj–10 of this title.

1 See Change of Name note below.
SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

Hardesty 

J. 

arraguirre 

Cherry 

2 

J. 

J. 

was procedurally barred absent a demonstration of good cause and actual 

prejudice. See NRS 34.726(1); NRS 34.810(1)(b); NRS 34.810(3). 

Moreover, because the State specifically pleaded laches, appellant was 

required to overcome the rebuttable presumption of prejudice. NRS 

34.800(2). 

Appellant's sole good-cause argument was a mere reference to 

his "statement of cause and prejudice" submitted with an earlier postconviction habeas petition. In affirming the denial of each of appellant's 

prior petitions, see Gallimort v. State, Docket Nos. 33289 & 36826 (Order 

of Affirmance, August 7, 2001); Gallimort v. State, Docket No. 49438 

(October 11, 2007), this court necessarily rejected any good-cause 

arguments therein such that appellant's instant good-cause claim is 

barred by the doctrine of the law of the case. See Hall v. State, 91 Nev. 

314, 315-16, 535 P.2d 797, 798-99 (1975). Moreover, appellant failed to 

overcome the presumption of prejudice to the State pursuant to NRS 

34.800(2). We therefore conclude that the district court did not err in 

denying the petition as procedurally barred, and we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 
cc: Hon. Jerome T. Tao, District Judge 

Jose A. Gallimort 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

3
Mis Abuelitos

•	 Todos los adultos con trastornos de salud

crónicos como el asma, la diabetes (tipo 1 y 2)

y las enfermedades cardíacas, deben vacunarse

contra la gripe (influenza) todos los años.

•	 La neumonía es una complicación grave de la

gripe.

•	 Algunas de las tasas más altas de hospitalización

y muerte por causa de la gripe se registran en

personas de más de 65 años.

Para más información en español visite:

http://www.cdc.gov/flu
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Find Upcoming Events 
-  Making Money In Your Sleep 

# Making Money in Your Sleep

###  Date and time 

Monday, April 15, 202411:00 a.m.- 12:00 p.m. CDT

###           Location        

                  Online              

### Organizer

                    Emmanuel Joshua ejwbw@umsystem.edu314-241-1005

###  Host organization 

St. Louis SBDC

###  Type of event 

Resource Partner event

## Event description

This 1 hour class will give you the basics understanding around why companies work by themselves, and how to begin the process of building a business that can put you in position to make money when you are not actively working. Not overnight, but over time.
Register
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 81633 / September 14, 2017

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-17809

____________________________________

 :

In the Matter of :

 : CORRECTED

Morgan Stanley Smith : ORDER APPOINTING

Barney LLC : TAX ADMINISTRATOR

:

:

Respondent. :

___________________________________ :

By order dated June 30, 2017, the Commission issued the “Omnibus Order Directing the 

Appointment of Tax Administrator in Administrative Proceedings that Establish Distribution 

Funds” (“Omnibus Order”),1authorizing the Secretary to issue orders beginning June 2017 and for 

calendar year 2018 appointing, upon request by the Commission staff, Miller Kaplan Arase LLP, a 

certified public accounting firm, which acquired Damasco & Associates LLP (“Miller Kaplan”), 

with one of their offices located in Half Moon Bay, California, as tax administrator (“Tax 

Administrator”) in administrative proceedings where the distribution fund may incur tax-related 

obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) under the Department of the Treasury 

Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

On September 14, 2017, the Commission staff requested the appointment of Miller 

Kaplan as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Miller Kaplan, pursuant to and in accordance with the 

Omnibus Order, is appointed the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding. 

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Brent J. Fields

Secretary

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 81057 (Jun. 30, 2017).
§ 94.21 Eligibility. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, reimbursement of qualified expenses under this subpart is available to a victim of international terrorism or his representative, pursuant to 34 U.S.C. 20106(a)(3)(A). For purposes of eligibility for this program only, the Attorney General shall determine whether there is a reasonable indication that an act was one of international terrorism, within the meaning of that section.
( b ) Reimbursement shall be denied to any claimant if the Director, in consultation with appropriate Department of Justice (DOJ) officials, determines that there is a reasonable indication that either the victim with respect to whom the claim is made, or the claimant, was criminally culpable for the act of international terrorism.
( c ) Reimbursement may be reduced or denied to a claimant if the Director, in consultation with appropriate DOJ officials, determines that the victim with respect to whom the claim is made contributed materially to his own death or injury by— ( 1 ) Engaging in conduct that violates U.S. law or the law of the jurisdiction in which the act of international terrorism occurred;
( 2 ) Acting as a mercenary or “soldier of fortune”;
( 3 ) (As a non-U.S. Government employee), acting as an advisor, consultant, employee, or contractor, in a military or political capacity— ( i ) For a rebel or paramilitary organization;
( ii ) For a government not recognized by the United States; or
( iii ) In a country in which an official travel warning issued by the U.S. Department of State related to armed conflict was in effect at the time of the act of international terrorism; or
( 4 ) Engaging in grossly reckless conduct.
[71 FR 52451, Sept. 6, 2006, as amended at 88 FR 3656, Jan. 20, 2023]
### §428d. Receipt of report of commission by Secretary of the Interior; acquisition of land for battlefield; other duties of Secretary

Upon receipt of the report of said commission the Secretary of the Interior is authorized and directed to acquire, by purchase, when purchasable at prices deemed by him reasonable, otherwise by condemnation, such tract or tracts of lands as are recommended by the commission as necessary and desirable for a national battlefield; to establish and substantially mark the boundaries of the said battlefield; to definitely mark all lines of battle and locations of troops within the boundaries of the battlefield and erect substantial historical tablets at such points within the battlefield and in the vicinity of the battlefield and its approaches as are recommended by the commission, together with such other points as the Secretary of the Interior may deem appropriate; to construct the necessary roads and walks, plant trees and shrubs, restore and care for the grounds, including the restoration and maintenance of those portions of old Fort Donelson, and of the Confederate water batteries that are located on the present engineer reservation: Provided, That the entire cost of acquiring said land, including cost of condemnation proceedings, if any, ascertainment of title, surveys, and compensation for the land, the cost of marking the battlefield, the expenses of the commission, and the establishment of the national battlefield shall not exceed the sum of $50,000.

(Mar. 26, 1928, ch. 248, §5, 45 Stat. 368; Feb. 18, 1930, ch. 49, 46 Stat. 69; Ex. Ord. No. 6166, §2, June 10, 1933; Ex. Ord. No. 6228, §1, July 28, 1933; Pub. L. 86–738, §§4, 5, Sept. 8, 1960, 74 Stat. 876.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1930—Act Feb. 18, 1930, inserted "military" between "national" and "park", authorized construction of roads and walks, planting of trees and shrubs, restoration and care of grounds, including portions of Fort Donelson and Confederate water batteries, and inserted "and the establishment of the national military park" in proviso.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"National battlefield" and "battlefield" substituted in text for "national military park" and "park", respectively, in view of redesignation of Fort Donelson National Military Park as Fort Donelson National Battlefield by Pub. L. 86–738. See section 428n of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Transfer of administrative functions of park, see note set out under section 428 of this title.
EXHIBIT 10.45

LOGO



December 28, 2000

Mr.
Thomas Gallagher
Park Place Entertainment Company
3930 Howard Hughes Parkway
Las Vegas, NV 89109

Dear
Tom:

In
light of your new position, your employment will terminate from Hilton Hotels Corporation ("Hilton") on December 31, 2000. In consideration for all of the valuable services you rendered to
Hilton during your career, and in full satisfaction of any rights that you may have accrued under the Company's 1996 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Option Plan") and the Company's Supplemental Retirement
and Retention Plan (the "SRRP"), the Company will agree to provide you with the exit arrangement summarized below. If this is acceptable to you, please so indicate in the space provided below. This
letter will then serve as our agreement as to your continuing entitlements under the Option Plan and the SRRP and confirm that there are no other benefits or rights due to you under either such plan.
You and Hilton hereby agree as follows:

1.  Hilton
will take all steps necessary to cause the stock options granted to you under the Option Plan on January 13, 2000 (for 200,000 shares) to be fully vested and
exercisable (at $9.21875 per share) until January 12, 2006. All other options granted to you under the Option Plan will terminate with your termination of employment on December 31,
2000.

2.  You
were originally credited with an interest in 279,065 shares under the SRRP. Hilton will also take all stops necessary to cause 48% of your entitlement under the SRRP
(133,951 shares) to vest and be distributable to you in accordance with the terms of the SRRP. The balance of your interest under the SRRP (145,114 shares) will be forfeited with your
termination of employment on December 31, 2000.

---

Mr. Thomas Gallagher
December 28, 2000
Page Two

If
the foregoing accurately sets forth your understanding of the agreement between Hilton and you, please so indicate in the space provided below in the copy of this letter attached and return the
same to me for our files. This letter will then constitute a binding obligation of both you and Hilton as to the matters described above.



This
letter accurately sets forth my agreement with
Hilton Hotels Corporation as to the matters described.

SIGNATURE

---

Thomas Gallagher

---

QuickLinks
#### § 630.1014 Implementation.

Each State shall work in partnership with the FHWA in the implementation of its policies and procedures to improve work zone safety and mobility. At a minimum, this shall involve an FHWA review of conformance of the State's policies and procedures with this regulation and reassessment of the State's implementation of its procedures at appropriate intervals. Each State is encouraged to address implementation of this regulation in its stewardship agreement with the FHWA.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Douglas Shepard, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of Harte-Hanks, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13
or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Report) by the Company fully complies with the requirements of those sections.

I further certify that, based on my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|              |  |                                                     
|------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|March 3, 2010 |  | /s/ Douglas Shepard                                 
|Date          |  | Douglas Shepard                                     
|              |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Note: This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.