alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Define

communication

goals

Identify needs

and perspectives

of intended audience

Create and

disseminate 

tailored messages

1. WHAT 2. WHO 3. HOW

A Communicator’s Tip 

Sheet for COVID-19 

Vaccination

Three Communication Considerations

 Tailor message to the information needs and 

values of the intended audience.

 Appeal to positive emotions (hope, caring 

for others). 

 Make vaccination the easy choice. 

 Use appealing formats: simple graphics, 

videos, personal narratives. 

 Use accessible language and ensure 

culturally sensitive translation into other 

languages.

 Frame vaccination as a social norm.

 Support people in making informed decisions 

about vaccination.

 Emphasize unity and message consistency 

across the political spectrum.

 Adapt to diverse platforms by partnering with 

traditional and social media outlets.

 Monitor misinformation and respond when 

appropriate.

 Use a “one size fits all” approach. 

 Incite negative emotions, such as fear and 

shame.

 Use judgmental language that may alienate 

some people.

 Use directive language to suggest 

vaccination is a requirement or mandate.

 Overwhelm with complicated statistics and 

lengthy scientific explanations.

 Set unrealistic expectations about vaccine 

availability.

 Exaggerate the vaccine’s ability to instantly 

end the pandemic.

 Dismiss widely shared concerns about side 

effects or adverse outcomes.

 Repeat the same message in the same way, 

inducing message fatigue.

 Politicize COVID-19 vaccination.

Do’s Don’ts
#### Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund, Respondent, v Concord Messenger Service, Inc., Appellant.

[826 NYS2d 187]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold B. Beeler, J.), entered September 22, 2005, which, in an action to recover unpaid workers’ compensation premiums, granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and denied defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiffs documentary evidence consisting of the insurance application, the policy, the audit reports and the resulting statements were sufficient to make out a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law *(see Commissioners of State Ins. Fund v Beyer Farms, Inc.,*15 AD3d 273, 274 [2005], *lv denied*5 NY3d 707 [2005]). Defendant’s argument that plaintiff did not prove the terms of the policy is improperly raised for the first time on appeal *(see Recovery Consultants v Shih-Hsieh,*141 AD2d 272, 276 [1988]), in its reply brief *(see Schulte Roth & Zabel, LLP v Kassover, 28*AD3d 404 [2006]), and we decline to consider it. Defendant’s claim that plaintiff incorrectly calculated the premiums at the rate for employees, rather than the lower rate for independent contractors, is conjectural, and rebutted by an express statement in an audit report plaintiff submitted. Defendant’s cross motion to dismiss *356the complaint on the ground of plaintiff’s “gross laches” in prosecuting the action was properly rejected in the absence of a CPLR 3216 notice *(Hodge v New York City Tr. Auth.,*273 AD2d 42, 43 [2000]). Defendant’s claimed need for discovery, which had languished for years, and is unsupported by any details concerning its claimed loss of relevant records, is no more than a “mere hope” that disclosure will reveal something helpful to its cause, insufficient to forestall summary judgment *(see Fulton v Allstate Ins. Co.,*14 AD3d 380, 381 [2005]). Concur—Friedman, J.P, Sullivan, Nardelli, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RONGQING WANG,

Petitioner,

v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 14

- 73409 Agency No. A201

- 207

- 106

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 14, 2016 **

Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges

. Rongqing Wang , a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of
the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of
removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 20 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 14

- 73409

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the
agency’s factual findings , Zehatye v. Gonzales , 453 F.3d 1182, 1184

- 85 (9th Cir.
2006) , and w e deny the petition for review

.
We do not consider new evidence that was not part of the record before the

agency. See Fisher v. INS , 79 F.3d 955, 963

– 64 (9th Cir. 1996) (en banc).
The record does not compel the conclusion that the mistreatment Wang

suffered in China , even if credible, rose to th e level of past persecution. See Gu v

.
Gonzales , 454 F.3d 1014, 1019

- 21 (9th Cir. 2006) ; see also INS v. Elias

- Za carias , 502 U.S. 478, 481 n. 1 (1992) (“T o reverse the BIA finding [the court] must find
that the evidence not only supports that conclusion, but compels it”). Substantial

evidence also supports the agency’ s determination that Wang did not establish a

well

- founded fear of futu re persecution. See Gu , 454 F.3d at 1021

- 22

. Thus, we
deny the petition as to Wang’s asylum claim.

B ecause Wang did not establish eligibility for asylum, his withholding of
removal claim necessarily fails. See Zehatye , 453 F.3d at 1190.
Finally, substanti al evidence supports the agency’ s denial of CAT relief

because Wang failed to establish that he woul d more likely than not be tortured by
or with the consent or acquiescence of a government official if returned to China.3 14

- 73409

See Zheng v. Holder , 644 F.3d 829, 835

– 36 (9th Cir. 2011).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-
OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Delta Apparel, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: November 8, 2005
    
    
    /s/ Robert W. HumphreysPresident and Chief Executive Officer
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

Washington, D.C. 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 92005 / May 25, 2021

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension of trading 

in the securities of Jin Wan Hong International Holdings Ltd (JWHI) commencing at 9:30 a.m. 

EDT on May 26, 2021 and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EDT on June 9, 2021.

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of the foregoing company due 

to a lack of current and accurate information about the company because it has not filed certain 

periodic reports with the Commission. This order was entered pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act).

The Commission cautions brokers, dealers, shareholders and prospective purchasers that they 

should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available 

information and any information subsequently issued by this company.

Brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11, at 

the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered relating to the securities 

of the subject company unless and until the broker or dealer has strictly complied with all of the 

provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is required by the rule, it 

should refrain from entering quotations relating to the securities of this company that has been 

subject to the trading suspension until such time as it has familiarized itself with the rule and is 

certain that all of its provisions have been met. Any broker or dealer with questions regarding

the rule should contact the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, DC 

at (202) 551-5777. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation which is in violation of the rule,

the Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement action. 

If any broker, dealer or other person has any information which may relate to this matter, they 

should immediately communicate it to the Delinquent Filings Branch of the Division of 

Enforcement at (202) 551-5466, or by e-mail at DelinquentFilings@sec.gov.
#### § 549.50 Purpose and scope.

The Bureau of Prisons does not ordinarily perform plastic surgery on inmates to correct preexisting disfigurements (including tattoos) on any part of the body. In circumstances where plastic surgery is a component of a presently medically necessary standard of treatment (for example, part of the treatment for facial lacerations or for mastectomies due to cancer) or it is necessary for the good order and security of the institution, the necessary surgery may be performed.
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 166 

Expressing support for the designation of May 1, 2019, as ‘‘Silver Star 

Service Banner Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 11, 2019 

Mr. BLUNT (for himself and Mr. HAWLEY) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of May 1, 2019, 

as ‘‘Silver Star Service Banner Day’’. 

Whereas the Senate has always honored the sacrifices made 

by the wounded and ill members of the Armed Forces; 

Whereas the Silver Star Service Banner has come to represent the members of the Armed Forces and veterans 

who were wounded or became ill in combat in the wars 

fought by the United States; 

Whereas the Silver Star Families of America was formed to 

help the people of the United States remember the sacrifices made by the wounded and ill members of the 

Armed Forces by designing and manufacturing Silver 

Star Service Banners and Silver Star Flags for that purpose; 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 166 ATS 

Whereas the sole mission of the Silver Star Families of 

America is to evoke memories of the sacrifices made by 

members of the Armed Forces and veterans on behalf of 

the United States through the presence of a Silver Star 

Service Banner in a window or a Silver Star Flag flying; 

Whereas the sacrifices made by members of the Armed 

Forces and veterans on behalf of the United States 

should never be forgotten; and 

Whereas May 1, 2019, is an appropriate date to designate as 

‘‘Silver Star Service Banner Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the designation of May 1, 2019, as 

3 ‘‘Silver Star Service Banner Day’’; and 

4 (2) calls upon the people of the United States 

5 to observe Silver Star Service Banner Day with ap6 propriate programs, ceremonies, and activities. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
#### John P. Gaitley, Respondent, *v.*Albany Foundry Company, Appellant.

Third Department,

May 7, 1913.

Corporation—liability of corporation on note given for loans — assignment of claim to president — constructive trust.

A corporation is liable on a note countersigned by its president for money loaned to it which was used for the purchase of claims against the corporation, which claims when paid were assigned to the president personally.

Although the claims were in form assigned to the president of the defendant he holds them in trust for it.

Appeal by the defendant, the Albany Foundry Company, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plain*11tiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Albany on the 17th day of October, 1912, upon the verdict of a jury rendered by direction of the court after a trial at the Albany Trial Term.'

*William O. Van Loon,*for the appellant.

*Countryman, Nellis, Du Bois & McDermott [Thomas F. McDermott*of counsel], for the respondent.

Smith, P. J.:

This action is brought to recover upon a promissory note for $3,000, executed April 5,1911, payable on demand to the plaintiff, and signed “ Albany Foundry Company. A. P. Deeds, Treasurer. Countersigned; John E. Gaitley.” John E. Gaitley was the president of the corporation. Upon proof of the execution of this note, which recited that it was for value received, plaintiff rested. The defendant for defense showed that the note was given for moneys borrowed by the defendant; that the moneys went into the account of the defendant corporation and were paid out by the treasurer upon order of the president for the purchase of claims against the defendant corporation; that upon the payment of those claims an assignment was executed to John E. Gaitley personally. Upon this evidence it was contended that it does not appear that the note was authorized by the corporation, and it does appear that it was used for the personal benefit of the president of the corporation and not that of the corporation. Waiving the question as to the proof of authority to execute it and the presumptions which apply, we are of the opinion that the corporation is shown to have received the benefits of the loan, and, therefore, is not in position to question its liability. If these claims were purchased from the funds of the corporation the claims became the property of the corporation, and it does not matter whether the claims were assigned in form to the president personally or whether the claims were released to the corporation. The president as matter of law holds all such claims thus assigned to him in trust for the corporation, and such trust would be declared either at the instance of the corporation or at the instance of any other creditors of the corpora*12tion who might be interested in the question. For this reason we are of opinion that the court properly directed a verdict for the plaintiff, and that the judgment should, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
### §77gg. Annual report by Corporation; printing and distribution

The Corporation shall make, print, and make public an annual report of its operations during each year, send a copy thereof, together with a copy of the account and balance sheet and auditor's report, to the Commission and to both Houses of Congress, and provide one copy of such report but not more than one on the application of any person and on receipt of a sum not exceeding $1: Provided, That the board of directors in its discretion may distribute copies gratuitously.

(May 27, 1933, ch. 38, title II, §206, 48 Stat. 95.)
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Each of the undersigned officers of American Realty Investors, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
Company) hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



| | (i) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2007, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company, at and for the periods indicated.
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                                                                                                  
|------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 15, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Daniel J. Moos                                                                               
|                    |  |  |  | Daniel J. Moos                                                                                   
|                    |  |  |  | President and Chief Operating Officer (Principal Executive Officer)                              
|                    |  | 
|Dated: May 15, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Steven A. Abney                                                                              
|                    |  |  |  | Steven A. Abney                                                                                  
|                    |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
### §392a. Provisions of section 392 extended to additional lands

The provisions of section 392 of this title are extended over and made applicable to the lands added to the park and included within the boundary established by section 391a of this title.

(Feb. 12, 1927, ch. 111, §2, 44 Stat. 1089.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Haleakalā National Park

Establishment of detached portion of Hawaii National Park lying on island of Maui as Haleakalā National Park, effective July 1, 1961, see section 396b of this title.
EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

|Name of Subsidiary                       | Jurisdiction of
Incorporation | Percent
Ownership
|---------------------------------------- | ----------------------------- | -----------------
|                                         |                               |                  
|Hastings, Inc.                           | Ontario                       | 100%             
|                                         |                               |                  
|HMC, Inc. (formerly Douglas Corporation) | Michigan                      | 100%             

In addition, Hastings Manufacturing Company owns a 50% interest in Casite Intraco, L.L.C., a Michigan limited liability company formed pursuant to a Joint Venture Agreement with Intraco Corporation.  This entity conducts business under
the name "The Casite Company."
### §410hhhh–1. Jimmy Carter National Preservation District

#### (a) Jimmy Carter National Preservation District

In order to preserve and interpret the life of James Earl Carter, Jr. and the rural southern town of Plains, Georgia, including the 20th century south and the roles of agriculture and the agricultural economy there is hereby established the Jimmy Carter National Preservation District, which shall consist of the area identified on the map referred to in section 410hhhh(b)(1) of this title as "Preservation District". The preservation district shall include the Plains Historic District as listed in the National Register of Historic Places on June 28, 1984, and those agricultural lands not to exceed 650 acres and that portion of Bond Street as depicted on such map.

#### (b) Preservation easements

(1) The Secretary may obtain by donation or purchase preservation easements on historically or culturally significant (as determined by the Secretary) buildings and open spaces located within the preservation district. Each preservation easement shall contain (but need not be limited to) provisions that the Secretary shall have the right of access at reasonable times to the portions of the property covered by that easement for interpretive or other purposes, and that no changes or alterations shall be made to such portions of the property except by mutual agreement.

(2) The Secretary may mark, interpret, and provide technical assistance to properties within the preservation district in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Historic Preservation Projects.

(Pub. L. 100–206, §2, Dec. 23, 1987, 101 Stat. 1435.)
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
OF UNITED SURGICAL PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with
the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30,
2003 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Mark A. Kopser, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of United Surgical Partners International, Inc. (the Company),
hereby certify that: 1.The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2.The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Mark A. KopserMark A. Kopser 
  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
  November 6, 2003  1


---