Jeremiah W. Uay) Nixon, Governor • Sara Parker Pauley, Director 

T OF NATURAL RESOURCES 


www.dnr.mo.gov 

MAY - 4 2012 

Mr. Karl Brooks 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. EPA, Region VII 

901 North Fifth Street 

Kansas City, KS 66101 

Dear Mr. Brooks: 

The Missouri Air Conservation Commission has recently revised or promulgated the following 

regulation(s) for the Missouri State Implementation Plan (SIP). The following is enclosed for 

your review: 

10 CSR 10-5.455 Control of Emissions From Industrial Solvent Cleaning Operations 

The amendment that was adopted on April 28, 2011 lowered the allowable emissions threshold 

for volatile organic compounds released per day from the use, storage and disposal of industrial 

cleaning solvents; added requirements for facilities that exceed the applicability threshold; and 

incorporated changes to be consistent with the current federal Reasonably Available Control 

Technology guidance documents. The subsequent amendment, adopted on February 2,2012, 

incorporated equipment cleaning work practices as a compliance option for manufacturers of 

coatings, inks, and resins. 

The commission adopted the enclosed rule action(s) on April 28, 2011 and February 2,2012 

after considering comments received at public hearing. The commission has full legal authority 

to develop rules pursuant to Section 643.050 of the Missouri Air Conservation Law. The state 

followed all applicable administrative procedures in proposing and adopting the rule action(s). 

Enclosed are the required SIP submittal elements for determination of plan completeness per 40 

CFR Part 51, Appendix V. 

The Missouri Department of Natural Resources requests that the U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency amend the SIP to replace the current rule(s) in the SIP. 

Compliant with the April 6, 2011 SIP regional consistency memo, an exact duplicate of this 

submittal is also being provided as an electronic attachment in an email to the Region VII 

Missouri coordinator. 

Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions regarding this submittal, 

o Recycl ed (laper 
Mr. Karl Brooks 


Page Two 


please contact Wendy Vit, with the Department's Air Pollution Control Program at P.O. Box 


176, Jefferson City, MO 65102 or by phone at (573) 751-7840. 


Sincerely, 

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM 

~M~eY Director 

KLM:spc 

Enclosures: 

Copy ofrule published in CSR 

Copy of commission signature page certifying Missouri Air Conservation Commission adoption 

Copy oftechnical support documentation for rule (if applicable) 

Copies of public hearing newspaper notices 

Copy of public hearing transcript introductory statement 

Copy ofMO Reg proposed rulemaking 

Copy ofMO Reg order ofrule making with comments/responses 

c: Missouri Air Conservation Commission 
than three hundred degrees Fahrenheit (300

°F). 

D. The inlet or as-applied rolling

lubricant temperatures at each mill shall not

exceed one hundred sixty degrees Fahrenheit

(160 °F) and such temperatures shall be monitored at all times that the mill is in operation. 

(B) Large Emission Sources. 

1. For any rolling mill that has ever had

actual VOC emissions equal to or greater

than one thousand (1,000) tons per calendar

year—

A. Emissions capture methods and

emissions control equipment must be

installed and used, which will result in an

overall VOC emission reduction of at least

eighty percent (80%).

B. An affected facility shall submit a

compliance plan that details how the required

VOC emissions will be controlled. The compliance plan shall include:

(I) A physical description and the

operating characteristics of the rolling mill; 

(II) A physical description of the

capture methods to be used and the operating

characteristics and design specifications of

the control equipment; 

(III) Expected annual quantities of

material throughputs to the mill and the control equipment; 

(IV) Potential VOC emissions,

expected actual VOC emissions from the

mill, both controlled and uncontrolled, and

total operating hours from the two (2) previous calendar years to be used as a baseline

for determination of overall emissions reductions; 

(V) Proposed methods of testing,

monitoring, record keeping and reporting for

determining compliance with this rule; 

(VI) A compliance schedule detailing all important interim dates up to and

including final compliance testing; and 

(VII) Any additional information as

requested by the director.

C. The compliance plan shall be submitted to the director no later than sixty (60)

days after the effective date of this rule.

D. The compliance plan shall be subject to the approval of the director.

2. Contingency plans. 

A. Should an affected facility not be

able to meet the overall eighty percent (80%)

VOC emission reduction, the facility must

develop and submit a plan detailing corrective

actions to obtain VOC emission reductions

equivalent to the shortfall. The contingency

plans shall be submitted to the director for

approval. 

B. The contingency plan shall include

the following: 

(I) The total VOC emission reductions that will be achieved by the plan; 

(II) The emission reduction method

of control that will be used to make up for

any shortfall in the original compliance plan; 

(III) Proposed method of record

keeping; and 

(IV) A proposed implementation

schedule. 

C. The contingency plan shall be submitted no later than one hundred twenty

(120) days after a determination is made that

the compliance plan does not meet the eighty

percent (80%) emission reduction.

(4) Record Keeping.

(A) For cold rolling mills—

1. Records of rolling lubricant formulations with identification of all oils and additives shall be maintained; 

2. Records of the initial and final boiling

points of all as-received oil shipments shall

be maintained; 

3. Records of the initial boiling points of

the as-applied rolling lubricant shall be maintained on a monthly basis; 

4. The temperature of the as-applied

rolling lubricant shall be continuously recorded; and 

5. All records of rolling lubricant formulations, distillation tests for oils, and asapplied rolling lubricants and rolling lubricant temperatures shall be retained for a period of at least three (3) years and be immediately available for inspection upon request by

the department or any agency with proper

authority. 

(B) For intermediate and finishing mills—

1. Records of rolling lubricant formulations with identification of all oils and additives shall be maintained; 

2. Records of the initial and final boiling

points of all as-received oil shipments shall

be maintained; 

3. Records of the initial boiling points of

the as-applied rolling lubricant shall be maintained on a monthly basis; 

4. The temperature of the as-applied

rolling lubricant shall be continuously recorded; and

5. All records of rolling lubricant formulations, distillation tests for oils, and

as-applied rolling lubricants and rolling lubricant temperatures shall be retained for a period of at least three (3) years and be immediately available for inspection upon request by

the department or any agency with proper

authority.

(5) Determination of Compliance.

(A) All incoming shipments of oil shall be

sampled and a distillation range test shall be

performed using American Society for

Testing and Materials (ASTM) methods

D86-99, Standard Method for Distillation of

Petroleum Products or other methods

approved by the director. The results of such

tests shall be used for compliance with subparagraph (3)(A)1.B. of this rule and subparagraph (3)(A)2.B. of this rule. 

(B) A grab sample of the as-applied rolling

lubricants shall be taken on a monthly basis

from each mill during any month that a mill

is in operation. A distillation range test shall 

be performed using ASTM methods. The

results of such tests shall be used to determine compliance with subparagraphs

(3)(A)1.C. and (3)(A)2.C.

(C) Compliance with subparagraphs

(3)(A)1.D. and (3)(A)2.D. shall be met with

continuous monitoring and recording of the

rolling lubricant temperature.

(D) Determination of the eighty percent

(80%) emission reduction requirement in

subparagraph (3)(B)1.A. shall be determined

through control efficiency emissions testing. 

AUTHORITY: section 643.050, RSMo

Supp. 1999.* Emergency rule filed March 15,

1995, effective March 25, 1995, expired July

11, 1995. Original rule filed March 15,

1995, effective Nov. 30, 1995. Amended:

Filed Feb. 9, 2000, effective Sept. 30, 2000.

*Original authority: 203.050, RSMo 1965, amended

1972, transferred to 643.050, RSMo 1986, amended 1992,

1993, 1995.

10 CSR 10-5.455 Control of Emissions From

Industrial Solvent Cleaning Operations

PURPOSE: This rule will reduce the volatile

organic compounds emissions from industrial

cleaning operations that use organic solvents. 

(1) Applicability.

(A) This rule shall apply throughout St.

Louis City and the Counties of Jefferson, St.

Charles, Franklin, and St. Louis.

(B) This rule shall apply to any person who

performs or allows the performance of any

cleaning operation involving the use of organic solvents or solvent solutions. Except as

64 CODE OF STATE REGULATIONS (4/30/12) ROBIN CARNAHAN

Secretary of State

10 CSR 10-5—DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Division 10—Air Conservation Commission
Chapter 5—Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Rules

Specific to the St. Louis Metropolitan Area 10 CSR 10-5

provided in subsections (1)(C) through (1)(G)

of this rule, the provisions of this rule shall

apply to any stationary source that emits at

least three (3) tons per twelve (12)-month

rolling period or more of volatile organic

compounds (VOCs) from cleaning operations

at the source, in the absence of air pollution

control equipment, and stores and/or disposes of these solvent materials.

(C) The following solvent cleaning operations are not subject to the provisions of this

rule: 

1. Cold cleaner;

2. Open top vapor degreaser;

3. Conveyorized cold cleaner;

4. Conveyorized vapor degreaser;

5. Stripping of cured coatings, cured

ink, or cured adhesives;

6. Cleaning operation in printing prepress or graphic arts pre-press area, including

the cleaning of film processors, color scanners, plate processors, film cleaning, and

plate cleaning;

7. Nonmanufacturing area cleaning.

Nonmanufacturing areas include cafeterias,

laboratories, pilot facilities, restrooms, janitorial cleaning, including graffiti removal,

and office buildings; and

8. Cleaning operations for emission

units within the following source categories

listed for regulation under section 183(e) of

the Clean Air Act:

A. Aerospace coatings;

B. Auto and light duty truck assembly

coatings;

C. Fiberglass boat manufacturing

materials;

D. Flat wood paneling coatings;

E. Flexible packaging printing materials;

F. Large appliance coatings;

G. Letterpress printing materials;

H. Lithographic printing materials;

I. Metal furniture coatings;

J. Miscellaneous industrial adhesives;

K. Miscellaneous metals parts coatings;

L. Paper, film, and foil coatings;

M. Plastic parts coatings;

N. Shipbuilding and repair coatings;

and

O. Wood furniture coatings.

(D) The following solvent cleaning operations are exempt from the VOC-content limitations specified in subsection (3)(A) of this

rule:

1. Cleaning of solar cells, laser hardware, scientific instruments, and high-precision optics;

2. Cleaning conducted as part of the following: performance laboratory tests on coatings, adhesives, or inks; research and development programs; and laboratory tests in

quality assurance laboratories;

3. Cleaning of paper-based gaskets and

clutch assemblies where rubber is bonded to

metal by means of an adhesive;

4. Cleaning of cotton swabs to remove

cottonseed oil before cleaning of high-precision optics;

5. Cleaning at medical device and pharmaceutical facilities using up to one and onehalf (1.5) gallons per day of solvents;

6. Cleaning of adhesive application

equipment used for thin metal laminating;

7. Cleaning of electronic or electrical

cables;

8. Touch-up cleaning performed on

printed circuit boards where surface mounted

devices have already been attached;

9. Cleaning of coating and adhesive

application processes utilized to manufacture

transdermal drug delivery product using less

than three (3) gallons per day of ethyl acetate;

10. Cleaning of application equipment

used to apply coating on satellites and radiation effect coatings;

11. Cleaning of application equipment

used to apply solvent-borne fluoropolymer

coatings;

12. Cleaning of ultraviolet or electron

beam adhesive application;

13. Cleaning of sterilization indicating

ink application equipment if the facility uses

less than one and one-half (1.5) gallons per

day of solvents for such cleaning;

14. Cleaning of metering rollers, dampening rollers, and printing plates;

15. Cleaning of numismatic dies; and

16. Cleaning of operations associated

with digital printing.

(E) Cleaning with aerosol products shall be

exempt from the requirements of subsection

(3)(A) of this rule if the facility uses one and

one-quarter (1.25) gallons (one hundred sixty

(160) fluid ounces) or less of the aerosol

products per day.

(F) Cleaning operations at a manufacturer

of coatings, inks, or resins are exempt from

subsections (3)(A) and (3)(B) of this rule. 

(G) Subsection (3)(E) applies to manufacturers of coatings, inks, and resins only.

(H) Once a source has exceeded the applicability level of this rule, it shall remain subject to this rule even if its actual emissions

drop below the applicability level of this rule

until it can demonstrate, to the satisfaction of

the director, that the total actual VOC emissions from solvent cleaning operations,

before consideration of controls, is less than

three (3) tons per twelve (12)-month rolling

period for sixty (60) consecutive months. 

(2) Definitions. Definitions of certain terms

specified in this rule may be found in 10 CSR

10-6.020.

(3) General Provisions.

(A) VOC-Content Limitations. No owner

or operator of a source subject to this rule

shall perform any cleaning operation subject

to this rule unless the owner or operator

meets the requirements in paragraph

(3)(A)1., (3)(A)2., or (3)(A)3. of this rule—

1. The VOC content of the as-used

cleaning solutions (minus water and exempt

compounds) shall not exceed the following

emissions limitations:

A. Product cleaning during manufacturing process or surface preparation for

coating, adhesive, or ink application.

B. Repair and maintenance cleaning.

C. Cleaning of ink application equipment.

ROBIN CARNAHAN (4/30/12) CODE OF STATE REGULATIONS 65

Secretary of State
D. All other solvent cleaning operations.

2. The composite vapor pressure of each

as-used cleaning solution used does not

exceed eight millimeters of mercury (8.0

mmHg) measured at twenty degrees Celsius

(20 °C) (sixty-eight degrees Fahrenheit (68

°F)); or

3. An oxidizer or carbon adsorber is

installed and operated that reduces VOC

emissions from the subject cleaning operation

by at least eighty-five percent (85%) overall.

The owner or operator may use an emission

control system other than an afterburner or

carbon adsorber if such device reduces VOC

emission from the subject cleaning operation

by at least eighty-five percent (85%) by mass,

the owner or operator submits a plan to the

director detailing appropriate monitoring

devices, test methods, record-keeping

requirements, and operation parameters for

such a control device, and such a plan is

approved by the director and the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

within federally-enforceable permit conditions.

(B) Cleaning Devices and Methods. The

owner or operator of a facility that is subject

to this rule shall employ one (1) or more of

the following cleaning devices and methods:

1. Wipe cleaning;

2. Closed containers or hand-held spray

bottles from which solvents are applied;

3. Cleaning equipment which has a solvent container that can be, and is, closed during cleaning operations, except when depositing and removing objects to be cleaned, and

is closed during non-operation with the

exception of maintenance and repair to the

cleaning equipment itself; and

4. Remote reservoir cleaner, if the operator of the cleaner complies with all of the

following:

A. Prevents solvent vapors from

escaping from the solvent container by using

such devices as a cover or a valve when the

remote reservoir is not being used, cleaned,

or repaired;

B. Directs solvent flow in a manner

that will prevent liquid solvent from splashing

outside of the remote reservoir cleaner;

C. Does not clean porous or

absorbent materials, such as cloth, leather,

wood, or rope;

D. Uses only solvent containers free

of all liquid leaks. Auxiliary equipment, such

as pumps, pipelines, or flanges, shall not

have any liquid leaks, visible tears, or cracks.

Any liquid leak, visible tear, or crack detected shall be repaired within one (1) calendar

day, or the leaking section of the remote

reservoir cold cleaner shall be drained of all

solvent and shut down until it is repaired or

replaced;

E. Non-atomized solvent flow method

where the cleaning solvent is collected in a

container or a collection system which is

closed except for solvent collection openings

and, if necessary, openings to avoid excessive

pressure build-up inside the container; and

F. Solvent flushing method where the

cleaning solvent is discharged into a container which is closed except for solvent collection openings, and, if necessary, other openings to avoid excessive pressure build-up

inside the container. The discharged solvent

from the equipment must be collected into

containers without atomizing into the open

air. The solvent may be flushed through the

system by air or hydraulic pressure or by

pumping.

(C) Operating Requirements. The owner or

operator of a source subject to the requirements of this section shall comply with the

following for each subject cleaning operation:

1. Cover all open containers and properly cover and store applicators used to apply

cleaning solvents;

2. Dispose of all used cleaning solutions, cleaning towels, and applicators used to

apply cleaning solvents in closed containers

that are nonleaking and nonabsorbent;

3. Minimize air circulation around the

cleaning operation; and

4. Utilize equipment practices that minimize emissions.

(D) Control Device Inspection. For catalytic oxidizers, the catalyst bed material

shall be inspected annually for general catalyst condition and any signs of potential catalyst depletion. The owner or operator shall

also collect a representative sample of the catalyst from the oxidizer, per manufacturer’s

recommendations, and have it tested to evaluate the catalyst’s capability to continue to

function at or above the required control efficiency. An evaluation of the catalyst bed

material shall be conducted whenever the

results of the inspection indicate signs of

potential catalyst depletion or poor catalyst

condition based on manufacturer’s recommendations but not less than once per year.

(E) Requirements for coatings, inks, and

resin manufacturers. Coating, ink, and resin

manufacturers must comply with the following requirements:

1. Clean portable or stationary mixing

vats, high dispersion mills, grinding mills,

tote tanks, and roller mills by one (1) or more

of the following methods:

A. Use a solvent or solvent solution

that either contains less than 1.67 pounds per

gallon (0.20 kilograms per liter) of VOC or

has a composite vapor pressure no more than

eight millimeters of mercury (8.0 mmHg) at

twenty degrees Celsius (20 °C); 

B. Collect and vent the emissions

from equipment cleaning to a VOC emission

control system that has an overall capture and

control efficiency of at least eighty percent

(80%) by weight for the VOC emissions.

Where such reduction is achieved by incineration, at least ninety percent (90%) of the

organic carbon shall be oxidized to carbon

dioxide; 

C. Use organic solvents other than

those allowed in subparagraph (3)(E)1.A. of

this rule provided no more than sixty (60)

gallons (two hundred twenty-eight (228)

liters) of fresh solvent shall be used per

month. Organic solvent that is reused or recycled (either onsite or offsite), for further use

in equipment cleaning or the manufacture of

coating, is not included in this limit; or

D. Comply with the following work

practices:

(I) Equipment being cleaned must

be maintained leak free;

(II) VOC-containing cleaning materials must be drained from the cleaned equipment upon completion of cleaning;

(III) VOC-containing cleaning

materials, including waste solvents, shall not

be stored or disposed of in such a manner that

will cause or allow evaporation into the atmosphere; and

(IV) Store all VOC-containing

materials in closed containers; and

66 CODE OF STATE REGULATIONS (4/30/12) ROBIN CARNAHAN

Secretary of State

10 CSR 10-5—DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Division 10—Air Conservation Commission
Chapter 5—Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Rules

Specific to the St. Louis Metropolitan Area 10 CSR 10-5

2. When using solvent for wipe cleaning, the owner or operator of a facility shall—

A. Not use open containers for the

storage or disposal of cloth or paper impregnated with organic compounds that is used

for cleanup or coating, ink, or resin removal;

and

B. Not store spent or fresh organic

compounds to be used for cleanup or coating,

ink, or resin removal in open containers.

(4) Reporting and Record Keeping. All owners and operators subject to this rule shall

maintain records as required by this section

sufficient to determine continuous compliance with this rule. These records shall be

kept for at least five (5) years to be automatically extended if enforcement action is pending. These records shall be made available

immediately upon request for review by the

Department of Natural Resources’ personnel

and other air pollution control agencies upon

presentation of proper credentials.

(A) The owner or operator of a facility that

includes an industrial solvent cleaning operation shall keep records detailing specific VOC

uses as necessary for the director to determine monthly compliance. All facility

records must include the following:

1. A list of all solvents currently used

and/or stored at the site. The list shall include

the following information:

A. Cleaning solvent type by

name/code/manufacturer;

B. The actual VOC content of the

cleaning solvents, based upon EPA Method

24, of each cleaning material, in pounds per

gallon of material, as applied or the VOC

composite partial vapor pressures of the solvents or solvent solutions used in the industrial cleaning operations. This calculation

need only be performed once for each batch

of cleaning solution used; and

C. The actual mixing ratio for the

cleaning solvent as applied; and

2. Records of usage including the following information:

A. Monthly records of total applied

volume in gallons for each cleaning solvent

used;

B. Monthly records of solvent cleaning activity associated with each solvent

used;

C. Monthly records of total volume of

aerosol products in ounces used; and

D. The total monthly VOC emissions

(summation of gallons × VOC content (in

pounds per gallon)).

(B) If a facility includes automatic equipment, records shall also include, as applicable, the following:

1. For a source with automatic equipment that prepares each batch of cleaning

solution(s) on site, records for each batch

shall include:

A. The name and identification of

each cleaning solution;

B. The VOC content of each cleaning

solvent in the cleaning solution;

C. Each change to the setting of the

automatic equipment, with date, time,

description of changes in the cleaning solution constituents (e.g., cleaning solvents),

and description of changes to the proportion

of cleaning solvent and water (or other nonVOC);

D. The proportion of each cleaning

solvent and water (or other non-VOC) used to

prepare the as-used cleaning solution;

E. The VOC content of the as-used

cleaning solution, with the supporting calculations; and

F. A calibration log for the automatic

equipment, detailing periodic checks;

2. For a source with automatic equipment that does not prepare cleaning solution(s) on site, records for each batch of

cleaning solution shall include:

A. The name and identification of

each cleaning solution;

B. Date, time of preparation, and each

subsequent modification of the batch;

C. The VOC content of each cleaning

solvent in the cleaning solution;

D. The total amount of each cleaning

solvent and water (or other non-VOC) used to

prepare the as-used cleaning solution; and

E. The VOC content of the as-used

cleaning solution, with supporting calculations; and 

3. For cleaning solutions that are not

prepared at the site, but are used as-purchased, the manufacturer’s specifications for

VOC content may be used if such manufacturer’s specifications are based on the results

of tests of the VOC content in accordance

with EPA Method 24.

(C) Any owner or operator using an emission control device pursuant to this rule shall

maintain records, on a daily basis, of key system operating parameters for emission control equipment, including, but not limited to:

1. Identification of the type of emissions

control system used;

2. Hours of operation;

3. Routine and non-routine maintenance, including dates and duration of any

outages;

4. Records of test reports conducted;

5. If an owner or operator of a solvent

cleaning operation employs a thermal oxidizer or catalytic oxidizer to achieve and maintain compliance, the owner or operator shall

comply with the following requirements:

A. Continuous temperature monitoring and continuous temperature recording

equipment shall be installed and operated to

accurately measure the operating temperature(s) for the control device; and

B. The following information shall be

collected and recorded each day of operation

of the solvent cleaning operation and the control device, and the information shall be

maintained at the facility for a period of five

(5) years:

(I) A log or record of the operating

time for the control device, monitoring equipment, and the associated solvent cleaning

operation;

(II) For thermal oxidizers, all three

(3)-hour periods of operation during which

the average combustion temperature was

more than fifty degrees Fahrenheit (50 °F)

below the average combustion temperature

during the most recent emission test that

demonstrated that the solvent cleaning operation was in compliance; and

(III) For catalytic oxidizers, all

three (3)-hour periods of operation during

which the average temperature of the dryer

exhaust gases immediately before the catalyst

bed was more than fifty degrees Fahrenheit

(50 °F) below the average temperature of the

dryer exhaust gases during the most recent

emission test that demonstrated that the solvent cleaning operation was in compliance,

and all three (3)-hour periods during which

the average temperature difference across the

catalyst bed was less than eighty percent

(80%) of the average temperature difference

during the most recent emission test that

demonstrated that the solvent cleaning operation was in compliance; and

6. If an owner or operator of a solvent

cleaning operation employs a carbon adsorption system to achieve and maintain compliance, the owner or operator shall comply

with the following requirements:

A. Monitoring and recording equipment that records all of the following shall be

installed and operated for the carbon adsorption system:

(I) A continuous emission monitoring and recording system that is capable of

accurately measuring and recording the concentration of organic compounds in the

exhaust gases from the carbon adsorption system;

(II) Monitoring and recording

equipment that are capable of accurately

measuring and recording the total mass steam

flow rate for each regeneration cycle of each

carbon bed; and

ROBIN CARNAHAN (4/30/12) CODE OF STATE REGULATIONS 67

Secretary of State
(III) Monitoring and recording

equipment that are capable of accurately

measuring and recording the temperature of

each carbon bed after regeneration (and after

completion of any cooling cycle(s)); and

B. The following information shall be

collected and recorded each day of operation

of the solvent cleaning operation and the carbon adsorption system:

(I) A log or record of the operating

time for the carbon adsorption system, monitoring equipment, and the associated solvent

cleaning operation;

(II) For a carbon adsorption system

that employs a continuous emission monitoring and recording system to measure and

record the concentration of organic compounds in the exhaust gases, all three (3)-

hour periods of operation during which the

average concentration level or reading in the

exhaust gases is more than twenty percent

(20%) greater than the exhaust gas organic

compound concentration level or reading

measured by the most recent performance test

that demonstrated that the solvent cleaning

operation was in compliance;

(III) For a carbon adsorption system that employs monitoring and recording

equipment to measure and record the total

mass steam flow rate for each regeneration

cycle of each carbon bed, all carbon bed

regeneration cycles during which the total

mass steam flow rate was more than ten percent (10%) below the total mass steam flow

rate during the most recent performance test

that demonstrated that the solvent cleaning

operation was in compliance; and

(IV) For a carbon adsorption system that employs monitoring and recording

equipment to measure and record the temperature of each carbon bed after regeneration

(and after completion of any cooling cycle(s))

was more than ten percent (10%) greater than

the carbon bed temperature during the most

recent performance test that demonstrated

that the solvent cleaning operation was in

compliance.

(5) Test Methods. Certain test methods mentioned in this rule may be found in 10 CSR

10-6.030. Other EPA test methods specific

to this rule may be found in 40 CFR 60,

Appendix A.

(A) Control Efficiency Testing. To demonstrate compliance with the emission limits of

subsection (3)(C) of this rule, an initial emission test shall be performed after any

required control equipment is installed. The

emission limits shall not have been met until

compliance has been verified through this

testing. Testing shall also be required after

significant modifications to any control

equipment required by this rule. Significant

modifications include any repairs or changes

that might substantially alter or affect the

overall control efficiency. This subsection

outlines the methods to be used for any such

testing.

1. The emission unit shall be run at typical operating conditions and flow rates compatible with scheduled production during any

emission testing.

2. EPA Method 1 or 1A, as appropriate,

shall be used to select the sampling sites.

3. EPA Method 2, 2A, 2C, or 2D, as

appropriate, shall be used to determine the

velocity and volumetric flow rate of the

exhaust stream.

4. EPA Method 3 or 3A, as appropriate,

shall be used to determine the concentration

of oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide (CO2).

5. EPA Method 4 shall be used to determine moisture content.

6. EPA Method 18, 25, or 25A shall be

used to determine the VOC concentration of

the exhaust stream entering and exiting the

control device, unless the alternate limit in

paragraph (3)(C)2. of this rule is being used

for compliance, in which case only the VOC

concentration of the exit exhaust shall be

determined. In cases where the anticipated

outlet VOC concentration of the control

device is less than fifty parts per million by

volume (50 ppmv) as carbon, EPA Method

25A shall be used.

7. If EPA Method 25A is used— 

A. The outlet readings from a thermal

or catalytic oxidizer may be corrected by

using EPA Method 18 or 25 to determine

non-VOC components (methane and ethane)

and subtracting these from the Method 25A

result; and

B. The director may require a retest

by EPA Method 18 or 25 if the average corrected outlet reading is greater than fifty (50)

ppmv VOC as carbon.

8. A compliance test shall consist of up

to three (3) separate runs, each lasting a minimum of sixty (60) minutes unless the director determines that the circumstances dictate

shorter sampling times. 

9. EPA Method 25 specifies a minimum

probe temperature of two hundred sixty-five

degrees Fahrenheit (265 °F). To prevent condensation, the probe should be heated to at

least the gas stream temperature, typically

close to three hundred fifty degrees

Fahrenheit (350 °F).

10. EPA Method 25A specifies a minimum temperature of two hundred twenty

degrees Fahrenheit (220 °F) for the sampling

components leading to the analyzer. To prevent condensation when testing heatset printing presses, the sampling components and

flame ionization detector lock should be heated to at least the gas stream temperature, typically close to three hundred fifty degrees

Fahrenheit (350 °F).

11. The oxidizer operating temperature

or the temperature of the gas upstream of the

catalyst bed may be used as the operating

parameter for determining continuous compliance with the emission standard of subsection (3)(C) of this rule. This temperature

shall be computed as the time-weighted average of the temperature values recorded during

the test. The owner or operator must maintain the oxidizer at a three (3)-hour average

temperature no less than fifty degrees

Fahrenheit (50 °F) below the average temperature observed during the most recent stack

test to demonstrate continuous compliance.

12. Use of an adaptation to any of the

methods specified in this subsection may be

approved by the director on a case-by-case

basis. The owner or operator shall submit

sufficient documentation for the director to

find that the methods specified in this subsection will yield inaccurate results and that

the proposed adaptation is appropriate.

13. To determine capture efficiency, use

the procedure in 10 CSR 10-6.030(20).

(B) VOC Content Testing for Cleaning

Solutions. The VOC content or VOC composite partial vapor pressure of cleaning solutions shall be determined by one (1) of the

following: 

1. Analysis by EPA Method 24 for VOC

content or by an appropriate method for VOC

composite partial vapor pressure of a sample

of the cleaning solution. The analysis may be

performed by the supplier of those materials;

2. Calculation for VOC content that

combines EPA Method 24 analytical data for

the concentrated materials used to prepare the

cleaning solution and the proportions in

which they are mixed to make the cleaning

solution as applied. Owners or operators may

use formulation information provided with

the concentrated materials used to prepare the

cleaning solution, such as the container label,

the product data sheet, or the Material Safety

Data Sheet (MSDS) to document the VOC

content of the concentrated material; or

3. If cleaning is not diluted prior to use,

MSDS or manufacturer’s formulation data

sheet may be used.

AUTHORITY: section 643.050, RSMo Supp.

2011.* Original rule filed Oct. 7, 1994,

effective May 28, 1995. Amended: Filed July

15, 1996, effective Feb. 28, 1997. Amended:

Filed Nov. 30, 2010, effective Aug. 30, 2011.

Amended: Filed Sept. 16, 2011, effective May

30, 2012.

*Original authority: 643.050, RSMo 1965, amended

1972, 1992, 1993, 1995, 2011; transferred from 203.050

in 1986.

68 CODE OF STATE REGULATIONS (4/30/12) ROBIN CARNAHAN

Secretary of State

10 CSR 10-5—DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Division 10—Air Conservation Commission
Order of Rulemaking 

Compliant with 643.055 RSMo, the Missouri Air Conservation Commission has 

determined that this action is needed to have a U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency approved State Implementation Plan. 

10 CSR 10-5.455 (amendment) Control of Emissions from Industrial Solvent 

Cleaning Operations is hereby AMENDED by the Missouri Air Conservation 

Commission this 2nd day of February, 2012. 

1&,--=-- i1 8t~ ---,--__~ t:/c;( ...."r-.-=~=~ __,Vice Chairman 

:f+-'--.I.. . QA)>&~_C- <B cukw ~~__,Member 

7~~~· ~~""""""'~""--~ dZ ___' Member 

_________________, Member 

_________________, Member 

_________________, Member 
------------

PUBLISHER'S AFFIDAVIT 


STATE OF MISSOURI,) 

)ss. 

COUNTY OF COLE) 

Mike Vivion being duly sworn, according to law, says he is Vice President of Central 

Missouri Newspapers, Inc., Publisher of the News Tribune, a newspaper printed and 

published in the County of Cole, and State aforesaid; that said newspaper has been 

published continuously for more than three years; and that the notice hereto attached was 

published in said paper in compliance with the provisions of Section 493.050 

R.S. of Mo. For 2000 as amended for ___1_t_im_e___ as follows: 

1st insertion, No. _______6_th__day of___N_ov_e_m_b_e_r__:, 20__1_1__ 

2nd insertion, No. _________ day of ,20____ 

3rd insertion, No. _________day of ,20____ 

4th insertion, No. ___________ day of , 20 

5th insertion, No. _________ day of ,20____ 

Fee: $301.00 2Jt;t I/~ 10th Subscribed and sworn to before me this •• ~ ..... i • ~ ~ 

"" ",'!. I" i'" '"'' ayo ________ November ~--__---, 20 _____________ 11 _ .. "' ......... ' d f 
 ~ ~ ~ , 

.\ -1 

lilrbaM. ~Cwftil!!,,¥fH, ',pcc, 

.. , 

My term as Notary Public expires ______________ 
MISSOURI AIR CONSERVATION COMMISSION 

WILL HOLD PUBLIC HEARING 

JEFFERSON CITY, MO The Missouri Air Conservation Commission will 

hold a public hearing on the use of fuel in hand-fired equipment; coal 

washing; control of emissions from mdustrial processes, solvent cleaning 

operations, and municipal solid waste landfills; and definitions and common 

reference tables on Thursday, December 8, 2011. The Public Hearing will 

begin at 9 a.m. at the Elm Street Conference Center, 1730 East Elm Street, 

Lower Level, Bennett Springs Conference Room, Jefferson City, Missouri. 

The commission will hear testimony related to the following item(s). 

* 10 CSR 10-5.040 (amendment) Use of Fuel in Hand-Fired Equipment Prohibited 

This proposed amendment will allow the burning of certain fuels, such as 

clean wood and biomass, in non-residential hand-fired equipment in the St. 

Louis Metropolitan area. Combustion practices and restrictions will be 

specified to ensure the eqUipment is operated in an environmentally-sound 

manner. 

* 10 CSR 10-5.455 (amendment) Control of Emissions from Industrial 

Solvent Cleaning Operations 

This proposed amendment will incorporate a change requested during the 

public comment period on a recent rulemaking that was not integrated into 

the rule text in the manner intended by the commenter. This change to the 

rule will incorporate equipment cleaning work practices as a compliance 

option for manufacturers of coatings, inks, and resins in the St. Louis area. 

* 10 CSR 10-5.130 (amendment) Certain Coals to be Washed 

This proposed amendment will update the area specific indirect heating rule 

references with the new statewide consolidated indirect heating rule 10 CSR 

10-6.405 that became effective October 30, 2011. 

* 10 CSR 10-6.020 (amendment) Definitions and Common Reference Tables 

This proposed amendment will update the area specific indirect heating rule 

references with the new statewide consolidated indirect heating rule 10 CSR 

10-6.405 that became effective October 30, 2011. At the same time, this 

rulemaking adds definitions of particulate matter for consistency with a December 2010 federal register notice that updated the federal definitions of 

particulate matter and removes the reference to 10 CSR 10-6.010 which is 

not necessary because it is redundant to national ambient air quality 

standards. 

* 10 CSR 10-6.400 (amendment) Restriction of Emission of Particulate 

Matter From Industrial Processes 

This proposed amendment will update the area specific indirect heating rule 

references with the new statewide consolidated indirect heating rule 10 CSR 

10-6.405 that became effective October 30, 2011. 

* 10 CSR 10-5.490 (amendment) Municipal Solid Waste Landfills 

This proposed amendment will update the rule to maintain consistency with 

the federal emission guidelines for municipal solid waste landfills, subpart 

Cc, that were published in the Federal Register on April 10, 2000, October 

17, 2000, and September 21, 2006. These updates corrected typographical 

and formatting errors and corrected inconsistencies from previous final rule 

actions. At the same time, additional language and formatting changes are 

being made for consistency with 10 CSR 10-6.310. Note that definitions proposed for removal in this rulemaking have been added to the general definition rule, 10 CSR 10-6.020. 

* 10 CSR 10-6,310 (amendment) Restriction of Emissions from Municipal 

Solid Waste Landfills 

This proposed amendment will update the rule to maintain consistency with 

the federal emission guidelines for municipal solid waste landfills, subpart 

Cc, that were published in the Federal Register on April 10, 2000, October 

17, 2000, and September 21, 2006. These updates corrected typographical 

and formatting errors and corrected inconsistencies from previous final rule 

actions. Note that definitions proposed for removal in this rulemaking have 

been added to the general definition rule, 10 CSR 10-6.020. 

* The State Implementation Plan Actions on Public Notice website 

(http://dnr.mo.gov/env/apcp/stateplanrevisions.htm) should also be viewed 

for plan actions that are included in the publiC hearing. 

Documents for the above item(s) will be available for review at the Missouri 

Department of Natural Resources, Air Pollution Control Program, 1659 Elm 

Street, Jefferson City, (573) 751-4817 and in the Public Notices section of 

the program web site www.dnr.mo.gov/env/apcp/index.htmI.This information will be available at least 30 days prior to the public hearing date. 

Persons with disabilities requiring special services or accommodations to 

attend the meeting can make arrangements by calling the Department 

directly at (573) 526-4679, the Department's toll free number at 

(800) 334-6946, or by writing two weeks in advance of the meeting to: Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Air Conservation Commission 

Secretary, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102. Hearing impaired persons may contact the program through Relay Missouri, (800) 735-2966. 

The commission holds public hearings under the provisions of chapter 643, 

RSMo. Citizens wishing to speak at the public hearing should notify the 

secretary to the Missouri Air Conservation CommisSion, Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Air Pollution Control Program, P.O. Box 176, 

Jefferson City, Missouri 65102-0176, or telephone (573) 526-4679. The Department requests persons intending to give verbal presentations also provide a written copy of their testimony to the commission secretary at the 

time of the public hearing. The Department also will accept written or email 

comments for the record until 5 p.m. on December 15, 2011; please send 

written comments to Chief, Air Quality Planning Section, Air Pollution 

Control Program, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0176. Email comments regarding rule actions shall be sent to apcprulespn@dnr.mo.gov and 

email comments regarding plan actions shall be sent to 

apcpsip@dnr.mo.gov. All written and email comments and public hearing 

testimony will be equally considered. 

Public hearing items may be adopted by the Missouri Air Conservation 

Commission as provided for under authority of 643.050, RSMo. For more information or a complete meeting agenda, including items being presented 

for adoption, contact the Missouri Department of Natural Resources' Air 

Pollution Control Program at (573) 751-4817. 

N.T. November 6, 2011 
PUBLIC HEARING 12/8/2011

www.midwestlitigation.com Phone: 1.800.280.DEPO(3376) Fax: 314.644.1334

MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES

Page 1

 BEFORE THE AIR CONSERVATION COMMISSION

 STATE OF MISSOURI

 DECEMBER 8, 2011

 MISSOURI AIR CONSERVATION COMMISSION

 PUBLIC HEARING

 Elm Street Conference Center

 1730 East Elm Street

 Lower Level

 Bennett Springs Conference Room

 Jefferson City, Missouri 65101

 9:00 a.m.

 BEFORE:

 Mark Garnett, Chairman

 Gary Pendergrass

 Ron Boyer

 Jack Baker

 David Zimmermann

(Starting time of the public hearing: 9:27 a.m.)

REPORTED BY:

Pamela Fick, RMR, RPR, MO CCR #447

Midwest Litigation Services

3432 West Truman Boulevard, Suite 207

Jefferson City, Missouri 65109

(573) 636-7551

1-800-280-3376
PUBLIC HEARING 12/8/2011

www.midwestlitigation.com Phone: 1.800.280.DEPO(3376) Fax: 314.644.1334

MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES

Page 2

1 P R O C E E D I N G S

2 CHAIRMAN GARNETT: The hearing will come

3 to order. Let the record show the following

4 Commissioners are present: Mark Garnett, David

5 Zimmermann, Gary Pendergrass, Ron Boyer and Jack

6 Baker.

7 The Air Conservation Commission of the

8 State of Missouri has called this public hearing

9 pursuant to Section 643.070, Revised Statutes of

10 Missouri, EPA promulgated rule 40 CFR 51.102 for the

11 purpose of hearing testimony relating to:

12 10 CSR 10-5.040 (amendment) Use of Fuel in Hand13 Fired Equipment Prohibited; 10 CSR 10-5.455

14 (amendment) Control of Emissions from Industrial

15 Solvent Cleaning Operations; 10 CSR 10-5.130

16 (amendment) Certain Coals to be Washed;

17 10 CSR 10-6.020 (amendment) Definitions and Common

18 Reference Tables; 10 CSR 10-6.400 (amendment)

19 Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter From

20 Industrial Processes; 10 CSR 10-5.490 (amendment)

21 Municipal Solid Waste Landfills; 10 CSR 10-6.310

22 (amendment) Restriction of Emissions from Municipal

23 Solid Waste Landfills; Missouri State Implementation

24 Plan Revision - 2013 Cross-State Air Pollution Rule

25 State Allowance Allocations for Existing Units For
PUBLIC HEARING 12/8/2011

www.midwestlitigation.com Phone: 1.800.280.DEPO(3376) Fax: 314.644.1334

MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES

Page 7

1 will their waste-disposal fees. For some small

2 businesses, these lower operating costs may

3 significantly improve their financial position.

4 If the Commission adopts this rule

5 action, it will be the Department's intention to

6 submit this rule amendment to the U.S. Environmental

7 Protection Agency for inclusion in the Missouri State

8 Implementation Plan.

9 This concludes my testimony. I will be

10 happy to answer any questions you might have specific

11 to the rule amendment.

12 CHAIRMAN GARNETT: Any questions?

13 (NO RESPONSE.)

14 CHAIRMAN GARNETT: You've got another

15 one, Stan? Go ahead.

16 MR. PAYNE: Mr. Chairman, members of the

17 Commission, my name is Stan Payne. I'm employed as

18 an environmental engineer by the Air Pollution

19 Control Program. I work at 1659 East Elm Street in

20 Jefferson City, Missouri.

21 I'm here to present testimony for the

22 proposed amendment to 10 CSR 10-5.455, Control of

23 Emissions from Industrial Solvent Cleaning

24 Operations. The rule information starts on page 95

25 of the briefing document.
7. Paints and paint thinners;

8. Chemicals;

9. Coal;

10. Glossy and/or colored papers;

11. Non-clean wood construction and/or demolition debris;

12. Plywood and/or particleboard;

13. Manure;

14. Animal carcasses; and

15. Asphalt products.

(4) Reporting and Record Keeping. (Not Applicable)

(5) Test methods. (Not Applicable)

AUTHORITY: section 643.050, RSMo [1994] 2000. Original rule

filed March 14, 1967, effective March 24, 1967. Amended: Filed

Sept. 26, 2011.

PUBLIC COST: This proposed amendment will not cost state agencies or political subdivisions more than five hundred dollars ($500)

in the aggregate.

PRIVATE COST: This proposed amendment will not cost private entities more than five hundred dollars ($500) in the aggregate.

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND NOTICE TO SUBMIT COMMENTS: A public hearing on this proposed amendment will begin

at 9:00 a.m., December 8, 2011. The public hearing will be held at

the Elm Street Conference Center, 1730 East Elm Street, Lower

Level, Bennett Springs Conference Room, Jefferson City, Missouri.

Opportunity to be heard at the hearing shall be afforded any interested person. Interested persons, whether or not heard, may submit

a written or email statement of their views until 5:00 p.m., December

15, 2011. Written comments shall be sent to Chief, Air Quality

Planning Section, Missouri Department of Natural Resources’ Air

Pollution Control Program, PO Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102-

0176. Email comments shall be sent to apcprulespn@dnr.mo.gov.

Title 10—DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

Division 10—Air Conservation Commission

Chapter 5—Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution

Control Rules Specific to the St. Louis Metropolitan

Area

PROPOSED AMENDMENT

10 CSR 10-5.130 Certain Coals to be Washed. The commission

proposes to amend section (3). If the commission adopts this rule

action, it will be the department’s intention to submit this rule

amendment to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to replace

the current rule that is in the Missouri State Implementation Plan.

The evidence supporting the need for this proposed rulemaking is

available for viewing at the Missouri Department of Natural

Resources’ Air Pollution Control Program at the address listed in the

Notice of Public Hearing at the end of this rule. More information

concerning this rulemaking can be found at the Missouri Department

of Natural Resources’ Environmental Regulatory Agenda website,

www.dnr.mo.gov/regs/index.html.

PURPOSE: This rule provides that specified coals shall be cleaned

by washing prior to their sale. The purpose of this rulemaking is to

update the reference to the area specific indirect heating rule with the

new statewide consolidated indirect heating rule. The evidence supporting the need for this proposed rulemaking, per section 536.016,

RSMo, is new rule 10 CSR 10-6.405, Restriction of Particulate Matter

Emissions From Fuel Burning Equipment Used For Indirect Heating

which replaces the area specific indirect heating rules.

(3) Exception. This regulation shall not apply if a person proposing

to use unwashed coal can show that the emission of sulfur dioxide

from the plant in which the coal is to be burned will not exceed two

and three-tenths (2.3) pounds of sulfur dioxide per million British

Thermal Units of heat input to the installation and that emission of

particulate matter will be no more than that allowed in 10 CSR 10-

[5.030]6.405.

AUTHORITY: section 643.050, RSMo [1994] 2000. Original rule

filed March 14, 1967, effective March 24, 1967. Amended: Filed

Sept. 16, 2011.

PUBLIC COST: This proposed amendment will not cost state agencies or political subdivisions more than five hundred dollars ($500)

in the aggregate.

PRIVATE COST: This proposed amendment will not cost private entities more than five hundred dollars ($500) in the aggregate.

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND NOTICE TO SUBMIT COMMENTS: A public hearing on this proposed amendment will begin at

9:00 a.m., December 8, 2011. The public hearing will be held at the

Elm Street Conference Center, 1730 East Elm Street, Lower Level,

Bennett Springs Conference Room, Jefferson City, Missouri.

Opportunity to be heard at the hearing shall be afforded any interested person. Interested persons, whether or not heard, may submit

a written or email statement of their views until 5:00 p.m., December

15, 2011. Written comments shall be sent to Chief, Air Quality

Planning Section, Missouri Department of Natural Resources’ Air

Pollution Control Program, PO Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102-

0176. Email comments shall be sent to apcprulespn@dnr.mo.gov.

Title 10—DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

Division 10—Air Conservation Commission

Chapter 5—Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution

Control Rules Specific to the St. Louis Metropolitan

Area

PROPOSED AMENDMENT

10 CSR 10-5.455 Control of Emissions from Industrial Solvent

Cleaning Operations. The commission proposes to amend subsection

(3)(E). If the commission adopts this rule action, it will be the department’s intention to submit this rule amendment to the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency to replace the current rule that is in

the Missouri State Implementation Plan. The evidence supporting the

need for this proposed rulemaking is available for viewing at the

Missouri Department of Natural Resources’ Air Pollution Control

Program at the address listed in the Notice of Public Hearing at the end

of this rule. More information concerning this rulemaking can be found

at the Missouri Department of Natural Resources’ Environmental

Regulatory Agenda website, www.dnr.mo.gov/regs/index.html.

PURPOSE: This rule will reduce the volatile organic compounds emissions from industrial cleaning operations that use organic solvents.

This amendment will revise the provisions for equipment cleaning at

manufacturers of coatings, inks, and resins by adding work practices

to the compliance options and removing it as a separate requirement.

The evidence supporting the need for this proposed rulemaking, per

section 536.016, RSMo, is a June 8, 2011, email from a trade association for manufacturers of coatings, inks, and resins.

(3) General Provisions.

(E) Requirements for coatings, inks, and resin manufacturers.

Coating, ink, and resin manufacturers must comply with the following requirements:

1. Clean portable or stationary mixing vats, high dispersion

Page 2233 November 1, 2011

Vol. 36, No. 21 Missouri Register
mills, grinding mills, tote tanks, and roller mills by one (1) or more

of the following methods:

A. Use a solvent or solvent solution that either contains less

than 1.67 pounds per gallon (0.20 kilograms per liter) of VOC or has

a composite vapor pressure no more than eight millimeters of mercury (8.0 mmHg) at twenty degrees Celsius (20 °C); 

B. Collect and vent the emissions from equipment cleaning to

a VOC emission control system that has an overall capture and control efficiency of at least eighty percent (80%) by weight for the VOC

emissions. Where such reduction is achieved by incineration, at least

ninety percent (90%) of the organic carbon shall be oxidized to carbon dioxide; [or]

C. Use organic solvents other than those allowed in subparagraph (3)(E)1.A. of this rule provided no more than sixty (60) gallons (two hundred twenty-eight (228) liters) of fresh solvent shall be

used per month. Organic solvent that is reused or recycled (either

onsite or offsite), for further use in equipment cleaning or the manufacture of coating, is not included in this limit; or

D. Comply with the following work practices:

(I) Equipment being cleaned must be maintained leak

free;

(II) VOC-containing cleaning materials must be drained

from the cleaned equipment upon completion of cleaning;

(III) VOC-containing cleaning materials, including

waste solvents, shall not be stored or disposed of in such a manner that will cause or allow evaporation into the atmosphere; and

(IV) Store all VOC-containing materials in closed containers; and

[2. Work practices while cleaning shall include:

A. Equipment being cleaned must be maintained leak

free;

B. VOC-containing cleaning materials must be drained

from the cleaned equipment upon completion of cleaning;

C. VOC-containing cleaning materials, including waste

solvents, shall not be stored or disposed of in such a manner that will cause or allow evaporation into the atmosphere;

and 

D. Store all VOC-containing materials in closed containers; and]

[3.]2. When using solvent for wipe cleaning, the owner or

operator of a facility shall[:]—

A. Not use open containers for the storage or disposal of

cloth or paper impregnated with organic compounds that is used for

cleanup or coating, ink, or resin removal; and

B. Not store spent or fresh organic compounds to be used for

cleanup or coating, ink, or resin removal in open containers.

AUTHORITY: section 643.050, RSMo [Supp. 2010] 2000. Original

rule filed Oct. 7, 1994, effective May 28, 1995. Amended: Filed July

15, 1996, effective Feb. 28, 1997. Amended: Filed Nov. 30, 2010,

effective Aug. 30, 2011. Amended: Filed Sept. 16, 2011.

PUBLIC COST: This proposed amendment will not cost state agencies or political subdivisions more than five hundred dollars ($500)

in the aggregate.

PRIVATE COST: This proposed amendment will not cost private entities more than five hundred dollars ($500) in the aggregate.

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND NOTICE TO SUBMIT COMMENTS: A public hearing on this proposed amendment will begin at

9:00 a.m., December 8, 2011. The public hearing will be held at the

Elm Street Conference Center, 1730 East Elm Street, Lower Level,

Bennett Springs Conference Room, Jefferson City, Missouri.

Opportunity to be heard at the hearing shall be afforded any interested person. Interested persons, whether or not heard, may submit

a written or email statement of their views until 5:00 p.m., December

15, 2011. Written comments shall be sent to Chief, Air Quality

Planning Section, Missouri Department of Natural Resources’ Air

Pollution Control Program, PO Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102-

0176. Email comments shall be sent to apcprulespn@dnr.mo.gov.

Title 10—DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

Division 10—Air Conservation Commission

Chapter 5—Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution

Control Rules Specific to the St. Louis Metropolitan

Area

PROPOSED AMENDMENT

10 CSR 10-5.490 Municipal Solid Waste Landfills. The commission proposes to amend subsections (1)(B) and (1)(C); add subsection (1)(D); amend original sections (2) and (3); add subsection

(3)(C); amend and renumber original sections (4) through (7); and

add new sections (4), (9), and (10). If the commission adopts this

rule action, it will be the department’s intention to submit this rule

amendment to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to replace

the current rule that is in the Missouri State Implementation Plan.

The evidence supporting the need for this proposed rulemaking is

available for viewing at the Missouri Department of Natural

Resources’ Air Pollution Control Program at the address listed in the

Notice of Public Hearing at the end of this rule. More information

concerning this rulemaking can be found at the Missouri Department

of Natural Resources’ Environmental Regulatory Agenda website,

www.dnr.mo.gov/regs/index.html.

PURPOSE: This rule requires municipal solid waste landfills to monitor their non-methane organic compound (NMOC) emissions.

Landfills having NMOC emission rates above the regulatory cutoff

shall design and install a gas collection and control system. This

amendment is to maintain consistency with federal emission

guidelines for existing municipal solid waste landfills promulgated as

40 CFR 60, Subpart Cc. The evidence supporting the need for this

proposed rulemaking, per section 536.016, RSMo, are Federal

Register updates published on April 10, 2000, October 17, 2000, and

September 21, 2006.

PUBLISHER’S NOTE: The secretary of state has determined that

the publication of the entire text of the material which is incorporated by reference as a portion of this rule would be unduly cumbersome

or expensive. This material as incorporated by reference in this rule

shall be maintained by the agency at its headquarters and shall be

made available to the public for inspection and copying at no more

than the actual cost of reproduction. This note applies only to the reference material. The entire text of the rule is printed here.

(1) Applicability.

(B) For purposes of obtaining an operating permit under Title V of

the Clean Air Act, the owner or operator of an MSW landfill subject

to this rule with a design capacity less than two and one-half (2.5)

million megagrams or two and one-half (2.5) million cubic meters is

not subject to the requirements to obtain an operating permit for the

landfill under 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) [part] 70 or 71,

unless the landfill is otherwise subject to either 40 CFR [part] 70 or

71. For purposes of submitting a timely application for an operating

permit under 40 CFR [part] 70 or 71, the owner or operator of an

MSW landfill subject to the rule with a design capacity greater than

or equal to two and one-half (2.5) million megagrams and two and

one-half (2.5) million cubic meters on the effective date of EPA

approval of the state’s program under section 111(d) of the Clean Air

Act (June 23, 1998), and not otherwise subject to either 40 CFR

[part] 70 or 71, becomes subject to the requirements of section

70.5(a)(1)(i) or 71.5(a)(1)(i) of the Clean Air Act ninety (90) days

after the effective date of such 111(d) program approval, even if the

design capacity report is submitted earlier.

Page 2234 Proposed Rules

November 1, 2011

Vol. 36, No. 21
April 16, 2012

Vol. 37, No. 8

COMMENT #13: St. Louis County Health Department recommended adding a requirement to post a permanent, conspicuous label summarizing the hand-fired equipment operating procedures, a list of

prohibited fuels, a summary of the current visible emission standard,

and statements regarding the importance of proper operation and

maintenance.

RESPONSE: Labels are not necessary since equipment operation

guidelines were added as a result of comment #6. Requiring them

would be overly burdensome and impractical for the applicable

sources, many of which are small businesses. Therefore, no changes

have been made to the rule as a result of this comment. 

COMMENT #14: St. Louis County Health Department recommended that hand-fired units only be allowed to operate during non-ozone

season, September 16 through April 14, to be consistent with open

burning regulations.

RESPONSE: All known sources are small businesses and only plan

to operate their hand-fired equipment to provide building heat during

the winter months, which is outside any regulatory ozone season.

Even if the hand-fired equipment were operated during ozone season,

the very small estimated emissions from these devices would have no

measureable impact on ground-level ozone levels in the St. Louis

area. Therefore, no changes have been made to the rule as a result of

this comment. 

COMMENT #15: St. Louis County Health Department recommended adding language that only allows burning of clean wood waste generated from a facility’s processes. This will prevent a facility from

bringing wood from other sources to burn in their device.

RESPONSE AND EXPLANATION OF CHANGE: Adding a

restriction that only allows facilities to burn process waste generated

onsite is consistent with the intent of the proposed amendment and

the appropriate language has been added to the rule.

10 CSR 10-5.040 Control of Emissions From Hand-Fired Equipment

(1) Applicability. This rule shall apply to all hand-fired, fuel-burning

equipment at commercial facilities, including, but not limited to furnaces, heating and cooking stoves, and hot water furnaces with the

exception of the following: 

(D) Ovens that only burn wood, charcoal, or anthracite coal for

pizzas or bakery products;

(2) Definitions.

(A) Clean wood—Wood that has not been treated (including, but

not limited to, treatment with copper chromium arsenate, creosote,

or pentachlorophenol) and has no paint, stain, or any other type of

coating.

(B) Definitions of certain terms specified in this rule, other than

those defined in this rule section, may be found in 10 CSR 10-6.020.

(3) General Provisions. No owner or operator shall operate applicable hand-fired, fuel-burning equipment unless the following conditions are met:

(A) Hand-fired equipment shall be operated to minimize emissions

at all times. This includes, but is not limited to, following all manufacturers’ operation and maintenance guidelines;

(B) Hand-fired equipment must be commercially manufactured;

(C) Hand-fired equipment may only burn process waste generated

onsite;

(E) Fuel shall be clean wood with a moisture content less than or

equal to twenty-five percent (25%); and

(F) Each piece of equipment shall burn no more than thirty (30)

tons of fuel per calendar year.

(4) Reporting and Record Keeping.

(A) The owner or operator of hand-fired equipment subject to this

rule shall keep records necessary to determine compliance.

(B) Records verifying that only dry wood was used for fuel may be

used to demonstrate compliance with the moisture content requirement. 

(C) Records required under subsections (4)(A) and (4)(B) of this

rule shall be retained by the owner or operator for a minimum of five

(5) years. These records shall be made available to the director upon

request.

Title 10—DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

Division 10—Air Conservation Commission

Chapter 5—Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution

Control Rules Specific to the St. Louis Metropolitan

Area

ORDER OF RULEMAKING

By the authority vested in the Missouri Air Conservation

Commission under section 643.050, RSMo Supp. 2011, the commission amends a rule as follows:

10 CSR 10-5.130 Certain Coals to be Washed is amended.

A notice of proposed rulemaking containing the text of the proposed

amendment was published in the Missouri Register on November 1,

2011 (36 MoReg 2233). No changes have been made in the text of

the proposed amendment, so it is not reprinted here. This proposed

amendment becomes effective thirty (30) days after publication in the

Code of State Regulations.

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS: The Missouri Department of Natural

Resources’ Air Pollution Control Program received no comments on

the proposed amendment.

Title 10—DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

Division 10—Air Conservation Commission

Chapter 5—Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution

Control Rules Specific to the St. Louis Metropolitan

Area

ORDER OF RULEMAKING

By the authority vested in the Missouri Air Conservation

Commission under section 643.050, RSMo Supp. 2011, the commission amends a rule as follows:

10 CSR 10-5.455 Control of Emissions From Industrial Solvent

Cleaning Operations is amended.

A notice of proposed rulemaking containing the text of the proposed

amendment was published in the Missouri Register on November 1,

2011 (36 MoReg 2233–2234). No changes have been made in the

text of the proposed amendment, so it is not reprinted here. This proposed amendment becomes effective thirty (30) days after publication in the Code of State Regulations.

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS: The Missouri Department of

Natural Resources’ Air Pollution Control Program received three (3)

comments from three (3) sources: The American Coatings

Association, U.S. Paint Corporation, and Lighthouse for the Blind

Industries.

Due to similarities in the comments, one (1) response will be provided for all comments. 

COMMENT #1: The American Coatings Association supports the

Page 610 Orders of Rulemaking
proposed amendment, as it will allow effective process equipment

cleaning at coating, ink, and resin manufacturers. They note that similar language is being adopted by many other states.

COMMENT #2: U.S. Paint Corporation supports the proposed

amendment. The revised compliance options will allow them to clean

their equipment with solvents that are suitable for their specialty

coatings without being hazardous to their employees.

COMMENT #3: Lighthouse for the Blind Industries expressed support of the proposed amendment. While they presently are able to

comply with the rule, potential changes to their products may make

future compliance extremely difficult without the proposed amendment. 

RESPONSE: The Air Program thanks the commenters for their support of the proposed amendment. No changes have been made to the

rule text as a result of these comments.

Title 10—DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

Division 10—Air Conservation Commission

Chapter 5—Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution

Control Rules Specific to the St. Louis Metropolitan

Area

ORDER OF RULEMAKING

By the authority vested in the Missouri Air Conservation

Commission under section 643.050, RSMo Supp. 2011, the commission amends a rule as follows:

10 CSR 10-5.490 is amended.

A notice of proposed rulemaking containing the text of the proposed

amendment was published in the Missouri Register on November 1,

2011 (36 MoReg 2234–2246). Those sections with changes are

reprinted here. This proposed amendment becomes effective thirty

(30) days after publication in the Code of State Regulations.

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS: The Missouri Department of

Natural Resources’ Air Pollution Control Program received ten (10)

comments from three (3) sources on this rule amendment: a representative for the Missouri solid waste industry and the Environmental

Industry Association, an attorney representing the IESI Corporation,

and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Due to the similarity in the following two (2) comments, one (1)

response that addresses these comments is at the end of these two (2)

comments:

COMMENT #1: The representative for the Missouri solid waste

industry and the Environmental Industry Association commented that

the industry was not aware of this regulation until it was sent out electronically a few days before the Missouri Register came out. In the

future it is expected that programs within the department would make

each other aware of rulemakings in development so that involved

companies can work with staff a little earlier.

COMMENT #2: The attorney representing IESI Corporation commented that he echoed the comments made by the representative for

the solid waste industry about involving industry early on in rulemakings before seeing rule actions published in the Missouri Register.

However, the proposed amendments should be adopted to bring

Missouri into compliance with the federal laws. They believe they are

already in compliance with these proposed changes because they

already meet the federal New Source Performance Standards.

RESPONSE: The Air Program regrets these commenters were not

aware of this rulemaking earlier. This rulemaking simply updated

state rules for consistency with federal requirements. The Air

Program communicated the proposed rulemaking with industry in

general and other stakeholders via the Air Forum email listserv and

within the department through the rulemaking process prior to filing

with the secretary of state on September 26, 2011. The proposed

rulemaking was made available for public review and comment by

publishing in the Missouri Register and posting on the Air Program’s

Rulemakings on Public Notice webpage on November 1, 2011.

However, based on these comments the Air Program is evaluating

how to better communicate rulemakings with industry and other programs within the department beyond our current activities. No wording changes have been made to the rule text as a result of these comments.

COMMENT #3: EPA commented that the last sentence in subsection

(1)(B) references the Clean Air Act. This reference should be to the

Code of Federal Regulations.

RESPONSE AND EXPLANATION OF CHANGE: As a result of

this comment, the last sentence in subsection (1)(B) has been revised

to reference the Code of Federal Regulations.

COMMENT #4: EPA commented that subsection (3)(C) was added

and discusses incorporation by reference. The EPA does not believe

that the reference to 52.21 is relevant to this rule because it relates to

the Prevention of Significant Deterioration program and is not relevant for municipal solid waste landfills. 

RESPONSE AND EXPLANATION OF CHANGE: As a result of

this comment, subsection (3)(C) rule text has been revised to indicate

that certain references to the department should be used in place of

the federal counterpart for incorporating federal regulations in the

state rule.

COMMENT #5: EPA commented for rule 10 CSR 10-6.310 that the

rule incorporates by reference the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)

as of June 30th. EPA believes the more appropriate date would be

July 1st to specifically reference the Code of Federal Regulations

compilation date.

RESPONSE AND EXPLANATION OF CHANGE: Since rule 10

CSR 10-5.490 also contains a similar incorporation by reference in

subsection (3)(C) of the rule and both rule amendments were presented together, EPA’s comment on 10 CSR 10-6.310 is also applicable to 10 CSR 10-5.490. Therefore, the first sentence in subsection

(3)(C) has been revised to the July 1st date.

COMMENT #6: EPA commented that the citation in subsection

(4)(G) is incorrect. There is no paragraph (3)(A)3. and EPA believes

the correct citation is paragraph (6)(A)3.

RESPONSE AND EXPLANATION OF CHANGE: As a result of

this comment, subsection (4)(G) rule text has been revised with the

correct citation to paragraph (6)(A)3.

COMMENT #7: EPA commented that in paragraph (6)(C)1. that

words are missing regarding surface monitoring of methane concentrations. The language should include a reference to thirty (30)-meter

intervals (or a site-specific established spacing).

RESPONSE AND EXPLANATION OF CHANGE: As a result of

this comment, paragraph (6)(C)1. rule text has been revised to

include the suggested wording that will match the federal regulation.

COMMENT #8: EPA commented that subparagraph (8)(B)1.B.

appears to have a typographical error. The threshold for nonmethane

organic compound (NMOC) emissions is set at twenty-five (25)

megagrams per year throughout the rule. However, subparagraph

(8)(B)1.B. includes the EPA threshold of fifty (50) megagrams and it

should be changed to reflect the NMOC emission rate of twenty-five

(25) megagrams per year. 

RESPONSE AND EXPLANATION OF CHANGE: As a result of

this comment, subparagraph (8)(B)1.B. rule text has been changed to

the correct value of twenty-five (25).

COMMENT #9: EPA commented that subsection (9)(A) should be

Page 611 April 16, 2012

Vol. 37, No. 8 Missouri Register
Chapter 5—Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Rules

Specific to the St. Louis Metropolitan Area 10 CSR 10-5

than three hundred degrees Fahrenheit

(300°F). 

D. The inlet or as-applied rolling

lubricant temperatures at each mill shall not

exceed one hundred sixty degrees Fahrenheit

(160°F) and such temperatures shall be monitored at all times that the mill is in operation. 

(B) Large Emission Sources. 

1. For any rolling mill that has ever had

actual VOC emissions equal to or greater

than one thousand (1,000) tons per calendar

year—

A. Emissions capture methods and

emissions control equipment must be

installed and used, which will result in an

overall VOC emission reduction of at least

eighty percent (80%).

B. An affected facility shall submit a

compliance plan that details how the required

VOC emissions will be controlled. The compliance plan shall include:

(I) A physical description and the

operating characteristics of the rolling mill; 

(II) A physical description of the

capture methods to be used and the operating

characteristics and design specifications of

the control equipment; 

(III) Expected annual quantities of

material throughputs to the mill and the control equipment; 

(IV) Potential VOC emissions,

expected actual VOC emissions from the

mill, both controlled and uncontrolled, and

total operating hours from the two (2) previous calendar years to be used as a baseline

for determination of overall emissions reductions; 

(V) Proposed methods of testing,

monitoring, record keeping and reporting for

determining compliance with this rule; 

(VI) A compliance schedule detailing all important interim dates up to and

including final compliance testing; and 

(VII) Any additional information as

requested by the director.

C. The compliance plan shall be submitted to the director no later than sixty (60)

days after the effective date of this rule.

D. The compliance plan shall be subject to the approval of the director.

2. Contingency plans. 

A. Should an affected facility not be

able to meet the overall eighty percent (80%)

VOC emission reduction, the facility must

develop and submit a plan detailing corrective

actions to obtain VOC emission reductions

equivalent to the shortfall. The contingency

plans shall be submitted to the director for

approval. 

B. The contingency plan shall include

the following: 

(I) The total VOC emission reductions that will be achieved by the plan; 

(II) The emission reduction method

of control that will be used to make up for

any shortfall in the original compliance plan; 

(III) Proposed method of record

keeping; and 

(IV) A proposed implementation

schedule. 

C. The contingency plan shall be submitted no later than one hundred twenty

(120) days after a determination is made that

the compliance plan does not meet the eighty

percent (80%) emission reduction.

(4) Record Keeping.

(A) For cold rolling mills—

1. Records of rolling lubricant formulations with identification of all oils and additives shall be maintained; 

2. Records of the initial and final boiling

points of all as-received oil shipments shall

be maintained; 

3. Records of the initial boiling points of

the as-applied rolling lubricant shall be maintained on a monthly basis; 

4. The temperature of the as-applied

rolling lubricant shall be continuously recorded; and 

5. All records of rolling lubricant formulations, distillation tests for oils, and asapplied rolling lubricants and rolling lubricant temperatures shall be retained for a period of at least three (3) years and be immediately available for inspection upon request by

the department or any agency with proper

authority. 

(B) For intermediate and finishing mills—

1. Records of rolling lubricant formulations with identification of all oils and additives shall be maintained; 

2. Records of the initial and final boiling

points of all as-received oil shipments shall

be maintained; 

3. Records of the initial boiling points of

the as-applied rolling lubricant shall be maintained on a monthly basis; 

4. The temperature of the as-applied

rolling lubricant shall be continuously recorded; and

5. All records of rolling lubricant formulations, distillation tests for oils, and

as-applied rolling lubricants and rolling lubricant temperatures shall be retained for a period of at least three (3) years and be immediately available for inspection upon request by

the department or any agency with proper

authority.

(5) Determination of Compliance.

(A) All incoming shipments of oil shall be

sampled and a distillation range test shall be

performed using American Society for

Testing and Materials (ASTM) methods

D86-99, Standard Method for Distillation of

Petroleum Products or other methods

approved by the director. The results of such

tests shall be used for compliance with subparagraph (3)(A)1.B. of this rule and subparagraph (3)(A)2.B. of this rule. 

(B) A grab sample of the as-applied rolling

lubricants shall be taken on a monthly basis

from each mill during any month that a mill

is in operation. A distillation range test shall 

be performed using ASTM methods. The

results of such tests shall be used to determine compliance with subparagraphs

(3)(A)1.C. and (3)(A)2.C.

(C) Compliance with subparagraphs

(3)(A)1.D. and (3)(A)2.D. shall be met with

continuous monitoring and recording of the

rolling lubricant temperature.

(D) Determination of the eighty percent

(80%) emission reduction requirement in

subparagraph (3)(B)1.A. shall be determined

through control efficiency emissions testing. 

AUTHORITY: section 643.050, RSMo

Supp. 1999.* Emergency rule filed March 15,

1995, effective March 25, 1995, expired July

11, 1995. Original rule filed March 15,

1995, effective Nov. 30, 1995. Amended:

Filed Feb. 9, 2000, effective Sept. 30, 2000.

*Original authority: 203.050, RSMo 1965, amended

1972, transferred to 643.050, RSMo 1986, amended 1992,

1993, 1995.

10 CSR 10-5.455 Control of Emissions from

Industrial Solvent Cleaning Operations

PURPOSE: This rule will reduce the volatile

organic compounds emissions from industrial

cleaning operations that use organic solvents. 

(1) Applicability.

(A) This rule shall apply throughout St.

Louis City and the Counties of Jefferson, St.

Charles, Franklin, and St. Louis.

(B) This rule shall apply to any person who

performs or allows the performance of any

cleaning operation involving the use of organic solvents or solvent solutions. Except as

ROBIN CARNAHAN (7/31/11) CODE OF STATE REGULATIONS 65

Secretary of State
provided in subsections (1)(C) through (1)(G)

of this rule, the provisions of this rule shall

apply to any stationary source that emits at

least three (3) tons per twelve (12)-month

rolling period or more of volatile organic

compounds (VOCs) from cleaning operations

at the source, in the absence of air pollution

control equipment, and stores and/or disposes of these solvent materials.

(C) The following solvent cleaning operations are not subject to the provisions of this

rule: 

1. Cold cleaner;

2. Open top vapor degreaser;

3. Conveyorized cold cleaner;

4. Conveyorized vapor degreaser;

5. Stripping of cured coatings, cured

ink, or cured adhesives;

6. Cleaning operation in printing prepress or graphic arts pre-press area, including

the cleaning of film processors, color scanners, plate processors, film cleaning, and

plate cleaning;

7. Nonmanufacturing area cleaning.

Nonmanufacturing areas include cafeterias,

laboratories, pilot facilities, restrooms, janitorial cleaning, including graffiti removal,

and office buildings; and

8. Cleaning operations for emission

units within the following source categories

listed for regulation under section 183(e) of

the Clean Air Act:

A. Aerospace coatings;

B. Auto and light duty truck assembly

coatings;

C. Fiberglass boat manufacturing

materials;

D. Flat wood paneling coatings;

E. Flexible packaging printing materials;

F. Large appliance coatings;

G. Letterpress printing materials;

H. Lithographic printing materials;

I. Metal furniture coatings;

J. Miscellaneous industrial adhesives;

K. Miscellaneous metals parts coatings;

L. Paper, film, and foil coatings;

M. Plastic parts coatings;

N. Shipbuilding and repair coatings;

and

O. Wood furniture coatings.

(D) The following solvent cleaning operations are exempt from the VOC-content limitations specified in subsection (3)(A) of this

rule:

1. Cleaning of solar cells, laser hardware, scientific instruments, and high-precision optics;

2. Cleaning conducted as part of the following: performance laboratory tests on coatings, adhesives, or inks; research and development programs; and laboratory tests in

quality assurance laboratories;

3. Cleaning of paper-based gaskets and

clutch assemblies where rubber is bonded to

metal by means of an adhesive;

4. Cleaning of cotton swabs to remove

cottonseed oil before cleaning of high-precision optics;

5. Cleaning at medical device and pharmaceutical facilities using up to one and onehalf (1.5) gallons per day of solvents;

6. Cleaning of adhesive application

equipment used for thin metal laminating;

7. Cleaning of electronic or electrical

cables;

8. Touch-up cleaning performed on

printed circuit boards where surface mounted

devices have already been attached;

9. Cleaning of coating and adhesive

application processes utilized to manufacture

transdermal drug delivery product using less

than three (3) gallons per day of ethyl acetate;

10. Cleaning of application equipment

used to apply coating on satellites and radiation effect coatings;

11. Cleaning of application equipment

used to apply solvent-borne fluoropolymer

coatings;

12. Cleaning of ultraviolet or electron

beam adhesive application;

13. Cleaning of sterilization indicating

ink application equipment if the facility uses

less than one and one-half (1.5) gallons per

day of solvents for such cleaning;

14. Cleaning of metering rollers, dampening rollers, and printing plates;

15. Cleaning of numismatic dies; and

16. Cleaning of operations associated

with digital printing.

(E) Cleaning with aerosol products shall be

exempt from the requirements of subsection

(3)(A) of this rule if the facility uses one and

one-quarter (1.25) gallons (one hundred sixty

(160) fluid ounces) or less of the aerosol

products per day.

(F) Cleaning operations at a manufacturer

of coatings, inks, or resins are exempt from

subsections (3)(A) and (3)(B) of this rule. 

(G) Subsection (3)(E) applies to manufacturers of coatings, inks, and resins only.

(H) Once a source has exceeded the applicability level of this rule, it shall remain subject to this rule even if its actual emissions

drop below the applicability level of this rule

until it can demonstrate, to the satisfaction of

the director, that the total actual VOC emissions from solvent cleaning operations,

before consideration of controls, is less than

three (3) tons per twelve (12)-month rolling

period for sixty (60) consecutive months. 

(2) Definitions. Definitions of certain terms

specified in this rule may be found in 10 CSR

10-6.020.

(3) General Provisions.

(A) VOC-Content Limitations. No owner

or operator of a source subject to this rule

shall perform any cleaning operation subject

to this rule unless the owner or operator

meets the requirements in paragraph

(3)(A)1., (3)(A)2., or (3)(A)3. of this rule—

1. The VOC content of the as-used

cleaning solutions (minus water and exempt

compounds) shall not exceed the following

emissions limitations:

A. Product cleaning during manufacturing process or surface preparation for

coating, adhesive, or ink application.

B. Repair and maintenance cleaning.

C. Cleaning of ink application equipment.

66 CODE OF STATE REGULATIONS (7/31/11) ROBIN CARNAHAN

Secretary of State

10 CSR 10-5—DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Division 10—Air Conservation Commission
Chapter 5—Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Rules

Specific to the St. Louis Metropolitan Area 10 CSR 10-5

D. All other solvent cleaning operations.

2. The composite vapor pressure of each

as-used cleaning solution used does not

exceed eight millimeters of mercury (8.0

mmHg) measured at twenty degrees Celcius

(20 °C) (sixty-eight degrees Fahrenheit (68

°F)); or

3. An oxidizer or carbon adsorber is

installed and operated that reduces VOC

emissions from the subject cleaning operation

by at least eighty-five percent (85%) overall.

The owner or operator may use an emission

control system other than an afterburner or

carbon adsorber if such device reduces VOC

emission from the subject cleaning operation

by at least eighty-five percent (85%) by mass,

the owner or operator submits a plan to the

director detailing appropriate monitoring

devices, test methods, record-keeping

requirements, and operation parameters for

such a control device, and such a plan is

approved by the director and the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

within federally-enforceable permit conditions.

(B) Cleaning Devices and Methods. The

owner or operator of a facility that is subject

to this rule shall employ one (1) or more of

the following cleaning devices and methods:

1. Wipe cleaning;

2. Closed containers or hand-held spray

bottles from which solvents are applied;

3. Cleaning equipment which has a solvent container that can be, and is, closed during cleaning operations, except when depositing and removing objects to be cleaned, and

is closed during non-operation with the

exception of maintenance and repair to the

cleaning equipment itself; and

4. Remote reservoir cleaner, if the operator of the cleaner complies with all of the

following:

A. Prevents solvent vapors from

escaping from the solvent container by using

such devices as a cover or a valve when the

remote reservoir is not being used, cleaned,

or repaired;

B. Directs solvent flow in a manner

that will prevent liquid solvent from splashing

outside of the remote reservoir cleaner;

C. Does not clean porous or

absorbent materials, such as cloth, leather,

wood, or rope;

D. Uses only solvent containers free

of all liquid leaks. Auxiliary equipment, such

as pumps, pipelines, or flanges, shall not

have any liquid leaks, visible tears, or cracks.

Any liquid leak, visible tear, or crack detected shall be repaired within one (1) calendar

day, or the leaking section of the remote

reservoir cold cleaner shall be drained of all

solvent and shut down until it is repaired or

replaced;

E. Non-atomized solvent flow method

where the cleaning solvent is collected in a

container or a collection system which is

closed except for solvent collection openings

and, if necessary, openings to avoid excessive

pressure build-up inside the container; and

F. Solvent flushing method where the

cleaning solvent is discharged into a container which is closed except for solvent collection openings, and, if necessary, other openings to avoid excessive pressure build-up

inside the container. The discharged solvent

from the equipment must be collected into

containers without atomizing into the open

air. The solvent may be flushed through the

system by air or hydraulic pressure or by

pumping.

(C) Operating Requirements. The owner or

operator of a source subject to the requirements of this section shall comply with the

following for each subject cleaning operation:

1. Cover all open containers and properly cover and store applicators used to apply

cleaning solvents;

2. Dispose of all used cleaning solutions, cleaning towels, and applicators used to

apply cleaning solvents in closed containers

that are nonleaking and nonabsorbent;

3. Minimize air circulation around the

cleaning operation; and

4. Utilize equipment practices that minimize emissions.

(D) Control Device Inspection. For catalytic oxidizers, the catalyst bed material

shall be inspected annually for general catalyst condition and any signs of potential catalyst depletion. The owner or operator shall

also collect a representative sample of the catalyst from the oxidizer, per manufacturer’s

recommendations, and have it tested to evaluate the catalyst’s capability to continue to

function at or above the required control efficiency. An evaluation of the catalyst bed

material shall be conducted whenever the

results of the inspection indicate signs of

potential catalyst depletion or poor catalyst

condition based on manufacturer’s recommendations but not less than once per year.

(E) Requirements for coatings, inks, and

resin manufacturers. Coating, ink, and resin

manufacturers must comply with the following requirements:

1. Clean portable or stationary mixing

vats, high dispersion mills, grinding mills,

tote tanks, and roller mills by one (1) or more

of the following methods:

A. Use a solvent or solvent solution

that either contains less than 1.67 pounds per

gallon (0.20 kilograms per liter) of VOC or

has a composite vapor pressure no more than

eight millimeters of mercury (8.0 mmHg) at

twenty degrees Celsius (20 °C); 

B. Collect and vent the emissions

from equipment cleaning to a VOC emission

control system that has an overall capture and

control efficiency of at least eighty percent

(80%) by weight for the VOC emissions.

Where such reduction is achieved by incineration, at least ninety percent (90%) of the

organic carbon shall be oxidized to carbon

dioxide; or

C. Use organic solvents other than

those allowed in subparagraph (3)(E)1.A. of

this rule provided no more than sixty (60)

gallons (two hundred twenty-eight (228)

liters) of fresh solvent shall be used per

month. Organic solvent that is reused or recycled (either onsite or offsite), for further use

in equipment cleaning or the manufacture of

coating, is not included in this limit;

2. Work practices while cleaning shall

include:

A. Equipment being cleaned must be

maintained leak free;

B. VOC-containing cleaning materials

must be drained from the cleaned equipment

upon completion of cleaning;

C. VOC-containing cleaning materials, including waste solvents, shall not be

stored or disposed of in such a manner that

will cause or allow evaporation into the atmosphere; and 

D. Store all VOC-containing materials in closed containers; and

ROBIN CARNAHAN (7/31/11) CODE OF STATE REGULATIONS 67

Secretary of State
3. When using solvent for wipe cleaning, the owner or operator of a facility shall:

A. Not use open containers for the

storage or disposal of cloth or paper impregnated with organic compounds that is used

for cleanup or coating, ink, or resin removal;

and

B. Not store spent or fresh organic

compounds to be used for cleanup or coating,

ink, or resin removal in open containers.

(4) Reporting and Record Keeping. All owners and operators subject to this rule shall

maintain records as required by this section

sufficient to determine continuous compliance with this rule. These records shall be

kept for at least five (5) years to be automatically extended if enforcement action is pending. These records shall be made available

immediately upon request for review by the

Department of Natural Resources’ personnel

and other air pollution control agencies upon

presentation of proper credentials.

(A) The owner or operator of a facility that

includes an industrial solvent cleaning operation shall keep records detailing specific VOC

uses as necessary for the director to determine monthly compliance. All facility

records must include the following:

1. A list of all solvents currently used

and/or stored at the site. The list shall include

the following information:

A. Cleaning solvent type by

name/code/manufacturer;

B. The actual VOC content of the

cleaning solvents, based upon EPA Method

24, of each cleaning material, in pounds per

gallon of material, as applied or the VOC

composite partial vapor pressures of the solvents or solvent solutions used in the industrial cleaning operations. This calculation

need only be performed once for each batch

of cleaning solution used; and

C. The actual mixing ratio for the

cleaning solvent as applied; and

2. Records of usage including the following information:

A. Monthly records of total applied

volume in gallons for each cleaning solvent

used;

B. Monthly records of solvent cleaning activity associated with each solvent

used;

C. Monthly records of total volume of

aerosol products in ounces used; and

D. The total monthly VOC emissions

(summation of gallons × VOC content (in

pounds per gallon)).

(B) If a facility includes automatic equipment, records shall also include, as applicable, the following:

1. For a source with automatic equipment that prepares each batch of cleaning

solution(s) on site, records for each batch

shall include:

A. The name and identification of

each cleaning solution;

B. The VOC content of each cleaning

solvent in the cleaning solution;

C. Each change to the setting of the

automatic equipment, with date, time,

description of changes in the cleaning solution constituents (e.g., cleaning solvents),

and description of changes to the proportion

of cleaning solvent and water (or other nonVOC);

D. The proportion of each cleaning

solvent and water (or other non-VOC) used to

prepare the as-used cleaning solution;

E. The VOC content of the as-used

cleaning solution, with the supporting calculations; and

F. A calibration log for the automatic

equipment, detailing periodic checks;

2. For a source with automatic equipment that does not prepare cleaning solution(s) on site, records for each batch of

cleaning solution shall include:

A. The name and identification of

each cleaning solution;

B. Date, time of preparation, and each

subsequent modification of the batch;

C. The VOC content of each cleaning

solvent in the cleaning solution;

D. The total amount of each cleaning

solvent and water (or other non-VOC) used to

prepare the as-used cleaning solution; and

E. The VOC content of the as-used

cleaning solution, with supporting calculations; and 

3. For cleaning solutions that are not

prepared at the site, but are used as-purchased, the manufacturer’s specifications for

VOC content may be used if such manufacturer’s specifications are based on the results

of tests of the VOC content in accordance

with EPA Method 24.

(C) Any owner or operator using an emission control device pursuant to this rule shall

maintain records, on a daily basis, of key system operating parameters for emission control equipment, including, but not limited to:

1. Identification of the type of emissions

control system used;

2. Hours of operation;

3. Routine and non-routine maintenance, including dates and duration of any

outages;

4. Records of test reports conducted;

5. If an owner or operator of a solvent

cleaning operation employs a thermal oxidizer or catalytic oxidizer to achieve and maintain compliance, the owner or operator shall

comply with the following requirements:

A. Continuous temperature monitoring and continuous temperature recording

equipment shall be installed and operated to

accurately measure the operating temperature(s) for the control device; and

B. The following information shall be

collected and recorded each day of operation

of the solvent cleaning operation and the control device, and the information shall be

maintained at the facility for a period of five

(5) years:

(I) A log or record of the operating

time for the control device, monitoring equipment, and the associated solvent cleaning

operation;

(II) For thermal oxidizers, all three

(3)-hour periods of operation during which

the average combustion temperature was

more than fifty degrees Fahrenheit (50 °F)

below the average combustion temperature

during the most recent emission test that

demonstrated that the solvent cleaning operation was in compliance; and

(III) For catalytic oxidizers, all

three (3)-hour periods of operation during

which the average temperature of the dryer

exhaust gases immediately before the catalyst

bed was more than fifty degrees Fahrenheit

(50 °F) below the average temperature of the

dryer exhaust gases during the most recent

emission test that demonstrated that the solvent cleaning operation was in compliance,

and all three (3)-hour periods during which

the average temperature difference across the

catalyst bed was less than eighty percent

(80%) of the average temperature difference

during the most recent emission test that

demonstrated that the solvent cleaning operation was in compliance; and

6. If an owner or operator of a solvent

cleaning operation employs a carbon adsorption system to achieve and maintain compliance, the owner or operator shall comply

with the following requirements:

A. Monitoring and recording equipment that records all of the following shall be

installed and operated for the carbon adsorption system:

(I) A continuous emission monitoring and recording system that is capable of

accurately measuring and recording the concentration of organic compounds in the

exhaust gases from the carbon adsorption system;

(II) Monitoring and recording

equipment that are capable of accurately

measuring and recording the total mass steam

flow rate for each regeneration cycle of each

carbon bed; and

68 CODE OF STATE REGULATIONS (7/31/11) ROBIN CARNAHAN

Secretary of State

10 CSR 10-5—DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Division 10—Air Conservation Commission
Chapter 5—Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Rules

Specific to the St. Louis Metropolitan Area 10 CSR 10-5

(III) Monitoring and recording

equipment that are capable of accurately

measuring and recording the temperature of

each carbon bed after regeneration (and after

completion of any cooling cycle(s)); and

B. The following information shall be

collected and recorded each day of operation

of the solvent cleaning operation and the carbon adsorption system:

(I) A log or record of the operating

time for the carbon adsorption system, monitoring equipment, and the associated solvent

cleaning operation;

(II) For a carbon adsorption system

that employs a continuous emission monitoring and recording system to measure and

record the concentration of organic compounds in the exhaust gases, all three (3)-

hour periods of operation during which the

average concentration level or reading in the

exhaust gases is more than twenty percent

(20%) greater than the exhaust gas organic

compound concentration level or reading

measured by the most recent performance test

that demonstrated that the solvent cleaning

operation was in compliance;

(III) For a carbon adsorption system that employs monitoring and recording

equipment to measure and record the total

mass steam flow rate for each regeneration

cycle of each carbon bed, all carbon bed

regeneration cycles during which the total

mass steam flow rate was more than ten percent (10%) below the total mass steam flow

rate during the most recent performance test

that demonstrated that the solvent cleaning

operation was in compliance; and

(IV) For a carbon adsorption system that employs monitoring and recording

equipment to measure and record the temperature of each carbon bed after regeneration

(and after completion of any cooling cycle(s))

was more than ten percent (10%) greater than

the carbon bed temperature during the most

recent performance test that demonstrated

that the solvent cleaning operation was in

compliance.

(5) Test Methods. Certain test methods mentioned in this rule may be found in 10 CSR

10-6.030. Other EPA test methods specific

to this rule may be found in 40 CFR 60,

Appendix A.

(A) Control Efficiency Testing. To demonstrate compliance with the emission limits of

subsection (3)(C) of this rule, an initial emission test shall be performed after any

required control equipment is installed. The

emission limits shall not have been met until

compliance has been verified through this

testing. Testing shall also be required after

significant modifications to any control

equipment required by this rule. Significant

modifications include any repairs or changes

that might substantially alter or affect the

overall control efficiency. This subsection

outlines the methods to be used for any such

testing.

1. The emission unit shall be run at typical operating conditions and flow rates compatible with scheduled production during any

emission testing.

2. EPA Method 1 or 1A, as appropriate,

shall be used to select the sampling sites.

3. EPA Method 2, 2A, 2C, or 2D, as

appropriate, shall be used to determine the

velocity and volumetric flow rate of the

exhaust stream.

4. EPA Method 3 or 3A, as appropriate,

shall be used to determine the concentration

of oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide (CO2).

5. EPA Method 4 shall be used to determine moisture content.

6. EPA Method 18, 25, or 25A shall be

used to determine the VOC concentration of

the exhaust stream entering and exiting the

control device, unless the alternate limit in

paragraph (3)(C)2. of this rule is being used

for compliance, in which case only the VOC

concentration of the exit exhaust shall be

determined. In cases where the anticipated

outlet VOC concentration of the control

device is less than fifty parts per million by

volume (50 ppmv) as carbon, EPA Method

25A shall be used.

7. If EPA Method 25A is used— 

A. The outlet readings from a thermal

or catalytic oxidizer may be corrected by

using EPA Method 18 or 25 to determine

non-VOC components (methane and ethane)

and subtracting these from the Method 25A

result; and

B. The director may require a retest

by EPA Method 18 or 25 if the average corrected outlet reading is greater than fifty (50)

ppmv VOC as carbon.

8. A compliance test shall consist of up

to three (3) separate runs, each lasting a minimum of sixty (60) minutes unless the director determines that the circumstances dictate

shorter sampling times. 

9. EPA Method 25 specifies a minimum

probe temperature of two hundred sixty-five

degrees Fahrenheit (265 °F). To prevent condensation, the probe should be heated to at

least the gas stream temperature, typically

close to three hundred fifty degrees

Fahrenheit (350 °F).

10. EPA Method 25A specifies a minimum temperature of two hundred twenty

degrees Fahrenheit (220 °F) for the sampling

components leading to the analyzer. To prevent condensation when testing heatset printing presses, the sampling components and

flame ionization detector lock should be heated to at least the gas stream temperature, typically close to three hundred fifty degrees

Fahrenheit (350 °F).

11. The oxidizer operating temperature

or the temperature of the gas upstream of the

catalyst bed may be used as the operating

parameter for determining continuous compliance with the emission standard of subsection (3)(C) of this rule. This temperature

shall be computed as the time-weighted average of the temperature values recorded during

the test. The owner or operator must maintain the oxidizer at a three (3)-hour average

temperature no less than fifty degrees

Fahrenheit (50 °F) below the average temperature observed during the most recent stack

test to demonstrate continuous compliance.

12. Use of an adaptation to any of the

methods specified in this subsection may be

approved by the director on a case-by-case

basis. The owner or operator shall submit

sufficient documentation for the director to

find that the methods specified in this subsection will yield inaccurate results and that

the proposed adaptation is appropriate.

13. To determine capture efficiency, use

the procedure in 10 CSR 10-6.030(20).

(B) VOC Content Testing for Cleaning

Solutions. The VOC content or VOC composite partial vapor pressure of cleaning solutions shall be determined by one (1) of the

following: 

1. Analysis by EPA Method 24 for VOC

content or by an appropriate method for VOC

composite partial vapor pressure of a sample

of the cleaning solution. The analysis may be

performed by the supplier of those materials;

2. Calculation for VOC content that

combines EPA Method 24 analytical data for

the concentrated materials used to prepare the

cleaning solution and the proportions in

which they are mixed to make the cleaning

solution as applied. Owners or operators may

use formulation information provided with

the concentrated materials used to prepare the

cleaning solution, such as the container label,

the product data sheet, or the Material Safety

Data Sheet (MSDS) to document the VOC

content of the concentrated material; or

3. If cleaning is not diluted prior to use,

MSDS or manufacturer’s formulation data

sheet may be used.

AUTHORITY: section 643.050, RSMo Supp.

2010.* Original rule filed Oct. 7, 1994,

effective May 28, 1995. Amended: Filed July

15, 1996, effective Feb. 28, 1997. Amended:

Filed Nov. 30, 2010, effective Aug. 30, 2011.

*Original authority: 643.050, RSMo 1965, amended

1972, 1992, 1993, 1995; transferred from 203.050 in

1986.

ROBIN CARNAHAN (7/31/11) CODE OF STATE REGULATIONS 69

Secretary of State
Order of Rulemaking 

Pursuant to 643.055 RSMo, the Missouri Air Conservation Commission has 

determined that this action is needed to have a U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency approved State Implementation Plan. 

10 CSR 10-5.455 (amendment) Control of Emissions from Solvent Cleanup 

Operations is hereby AMENDED by the Missouri Air Conservation Commission 

this 28th day of April, 2011. 

-----I. . ,fo -v-- !L--=- ~ __,Chairman

rS!MJQ@:JJ/JI&~ , Vice-Chairman 

~~ , Member 

:r ce.-o&, C 8 ~ L ,Member 

~A':...L~~L4I--J-J-J-I-B....L~~~===-~--, Member 

_______________________________,Member 

_______________________________,Member 
PUBLISHER'S AFFIDAVIT 


STATE OF MISSOURI,) 


)ss. 


COUNTY OF COLE) 


Mike Vivion being duly sworn, according to law, says he is Vice President of Central 

Missouri Newspapers, Inc., Publisher of the News Tribune, a newspaper printed and 

published in the County of Cole, and State aforesaid; that said newspaper has been 

published continuously for more than three years; and that the notice hereto attached was 

published in said paper in compliance with the provisions of Section 493.050 

R.S. ofMo. For 2000 as amended for ___1_t_im_e___ as follows: 

1st insertion, No. ________28_t_h__ day of___F_e_b_ru_a_ry___, 20__1_1__ 

2nd insertion, No. __________ day of , 20____ 

3rd insertion, No. ___________ day of , 20____ 

4th. InSertlOn, . N1 o. _____ ______ day 0 f , 20____

5th insertion, No. ___________ day of , 20____ 

Fee: $358.00 m:tj/~ Subscribed and sworn to before me this _____15_t_____ 

. . / March 20 11 day 0 f ___________, _________ .' 

" 

Notary /f1Pub 1 ic IJolary Public· '"'Fn"ru." Staleo! M:Jsouri 

, My Commission Expires March 13,201:3 '. " ... ... - .. Cole County

My term as Notary Public expires _______Co_m_mi_,s_ion_ltO_0"_'lQ_T...;;.. 3__ 
MISSOURI AIR CONSERVATION COMMISSION 

.~ WILL HOLD PUBLIC HEARING 

JEFFERSON U~TY, MO -- The Missouri Air Conservation Commission will 

hold a public hearing on the SI. Louis ozone nonattainment area reasonably 

available control technology (RACT) rules and RACT demonstration update; 

the greenhouse gas permitting rules; the hospital, medical and infectious 

waste incineratoT rule; ~nd general conformity rule on Thursday, March 31, 

2011. The Public Heanng will begin at 9 a.m. at the Elm Street Conference 

Center, 1730 East Elm Street, Lower Level, Bennett Springs Conference 

Room, Jeffer:son. City, Missouri. The commission will hear testimony related 

to.t~e follOWing Item(s). Note that all but the last two following items were 

Originally scheduled for a February 3, 2011 public hearing that was 

canceled due to inclement weather. 

* 10 CSR 10-S.330 (amendment) Control of Emissions from Industrial 

Surface Coating Operations 

This proposed amendment will exempt facilities that are regulated under 

other rules that limit emissions of volatile organic compounds and incorporate changes in Reasonably Available ContrOl Technology (RACT) for 

surface coating operations in the SI. Louis ozone nonattainment area to be 

consistent with the current federal RACT guidance documents. 

* 10 CSR 10-S.340 (amendment) Control of Emissions from Rotogravure 

and Flexographic Printing Operations 

This proposed amendment will add specific emission limits of volatile 

organic compounds for flexible package printing operations in the SI. Louis 

ozone nonattainment area. This will make the limits consistent with the 

current federal Reasonably Available Control Technology guidance documents. 

* 10 eSR 10-5.442 (amendment) Control of Emissions from Lithographic 

Printing Operations 

This proposed amendment will add specific emission limits of volatile 

organi? co,:"pounds for .both offset tithoWaphic and letterpress printing 

operations In the St. LoUIS ozone nonattalnment area. This will make the 

limits consistent with the current federal Reasonably Available Control 

Technology guidance documents. The amendment will also remove definitions that will now be found in 10 CSR 10-6.020. 

* 10 CSR 10-5.455 (amendment) Control of EmiSSion from Solvent Cleanup 

Operations 

This proposed amendment will lower the allowable emissions threshold for 

volatile or~anic ~ompoun~s released per day from the use, storage and disposal of Industnal cleaning solvents, add requirements for facilities that 

exceed the threshold, and incorporate changes to be consistent with the 

current federal Reasonably Available Control Technology guidance documents. This rule applies to the SI. Louis ozone nonattainment area. 

* 10 CSR 10-6.020 (amendment) Definitions and Common Reference Tables 

This proposed amendment will add all definitions currently found in in­

~ividual Divi~ion 10 air r~I?~ into the g~neral definitions rule unless a specifIC reason eXists for a definition to be unique to a specific rule. 

* 10 CSR 10-6.060 (amendment) Construction Permits Required 

This ~roposed amendment incorporates federal permitting requirements 

that Will cover new construction projects that emit 100,000 tons per year or 

more of greenhouse gases and clarifies rule text. 

* 10 CSR 10-6.065 (amendment) Operating Permits 

This proposed amendment incorporates federal permitting requirements for 

greenhouse gas emiSSions, removes definitions that will now be found in 

re.gulati?n 10 CSR 10-6.0~0, streamlines the public notice procedure to 

align With the Federal Register, and allows the flexibility to publish notices 

on the web. 

*. 10 CSR 10-6.200 (amendment) Hospital, Medical, Infectious Wast Incinerators 

Thi~ ~ropo~e~ amendment will update the state regulatory requirements for 

eml;;Slon h",!ltS, waste mana!:lement plans, compliance and performance 

teSllng, mOnitoring, and reporting and record keeping to be consistent wnh 

the recent federal update to 40 CFR Part 60 and remove definitions that will 

now be found in 10 CSR 10-6.020. 

* 10 CSR 10-6.300 (amendment) Conformny of General Federal Actions to 

State Implementation Plans 

This prop?Sed amendment ~iII update the state general conformity rule to 

~omply w~th the recen~ly revised federal general conformity rule published 

In the April 5, 2010 edition of the Federal Register. Incorporating the latest 

federal regulations Will ensure that all federal actions conform to the state's 

implementation plan and will not cause or contribute to violations of the national ambient air quality standards. 

* Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) Demonstration Update 

for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard SI. Louis Nonattainment Area 

The Clean Air Act. requires moderate ozone nonattainment areas, such as 

St. LOUIS, to submit a demonstration that current rules fulfill RACT under the 

1997. 8-hour ?zone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for 

volatde . organic comp~unds for all Control Technique Guidelines (CTG) 

categories and all major, non-CTG sources as a revision to their State 

Implementation Plan. This document updates the RACT demonstration 

submitted to the EPA in 2007 and certifies that current rules, including those 

proposed for amendment, fulfill RACT requirements for the 1997 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS. 

Documents for the above item(s) will be available for review at the Missouri 

Department of Natural Resources, Air Pollution Control Program, 1659 Elm 

Street, Jefferson City, (S73) 751-4817 and in the Public Notices section of 

the program web site www.dnr.mo.gov/env/apcp/index.htmI.This information will be available at least 30 days prior to the public hearing date. 

Persons with disabilities requiring special services or accommodations to 

attend the meeting can make arrangements by calling the Department 

directly at (S73) 526-4679, the Department's toli free number at 

{BOOl 334-6946, or by writing two weeks in advance of the meeting to: MisSOUri Department of Natural Resources, Air Conservation Commission 

Secretary, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102. Hearing impaired persons may l?o~ct the program through Relay Missouri, (800) 735-2966. 

The commission holds public hearings under the provisions of chapter 643 

RSMo. Citizens wishing to speak at the public hearing should not~ tm; 

secretary to the Missouri Air Conservation Commission, Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Air Pollution Control Program, p..o.~ Box 176, 

Jefferson City, Missouri 65102-0176, or telephone (573) 526-4679. The Dep.artment requests persons intending to give verbal presentations also pro­

~Ide a written c:opy of their testimony to the commission secretary at the 

time of the pubhc hearing. The Department also will accept written or email 

comments for the record until 5 p.m. on April 7, 2011; please send written 

comments to Chief, Air Quality Planning Section, Air Pollution Control Program, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0176. Email comments regarding rule actions shall be sent to apcprulespn@dnr.mo.gov and email 

com"'!ents regardin.g plan actions shall be sent to apcpsppn@dnr.mo.gov. 

All w~ltten and email comments and public hearing testimony will be equally 

conSidered. 

Public hearing items may be adopted by the Missouri Air Conservation 

Commission as provided for I,Inder authority of 643.0S0, RSMo. For more 

information or a complete meeting agenda, including items being presented 

for adoption, contact the Missouri Department of Natural Resources' Air 

Pollution Control Program at (S73) 151-4817. 

N.T. February 28, 2011 
MEETING 3/31/2011 

Page 1 

1 BEFORE THE AIR CONSERVATION COMMISSION 

STATE OF MISSOURI 


2 


3 


4 


5 


6 MISSOURI AIR CONSERVATION COMMISSION MEETING 


7 Elm Street Conference Center 


1730 East Elm Street 


8 Lower 


•

Bennett Springs Con Room 


9 Jefferson Ci ,Missouri 65101 
 ~ 9:00 a.m. [i

10 

11 MARCH 31, 2011 ... 

12 

BEFORE: 

13 

Mark Garnett, Chairman 

14 Gary Pendergrass 

Ron Boyer 

15 Jack Baker 

David Zimmermann 

16 

17 

REPORTED BY: 

18 

Pamela Fick, RMR, RPR, MO CCR #447 

19 Midwest Litigation Services 

3432 West Truman Boulevard, Suite 207 

20 Jefferson City, Missouri 65109 

(573) 636-7551 

21 1 800 280-3376 

22 

23 

24 (Starting time of the public hearing: 9:13 a.m.) 

25 

MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES 

www.midwestIitigation.com Phone: 1.800.280.3376 Fax: 314.644.1334 
5 

10 

15 

20 

25 

MEETING 3/3112011 

Page 2 

1 PRO C E E DIN G S 

2 CHAIRMAN GARNETT: I'm going to call to 

3 order public hearing. The hearing will come to 

4 order. Let the record show the llowing 

Commiss are present: Mark Garnett, 

6 Pendergrass, Ron Boyer, Jack Baker and David 

7 Zimmermann. 

8 Air Conservation Commission, the State 

9 of Missouri, has called this public hearing pursuant 

to Section 643.070, Revised Statutes of Missouri, EPA 

11 promulgated Rule 40 CFR 51.102, for the purpose of 

12 hearing testimony relating to 10 CSR 10 6.020 

13 (amendment), Def tions and Common Reference Tables: 

14 10 CSR 5.330 (amendment), Control of Emissions from 

Industr Surface Coating Operations; 

16 10 CSR 10 5.340 (amendment), Controll of Emissions 

17 from Rotogravure and Flexographic Printing 

18 Operations; 10 CSR 10 5.442 (amendment), Control of 

19 Emissions from Lithographic Printing Operations; 

10 CSR 10-5.455 (amendment) I Control of Emission from 

21 Solvent Cleanup Operations; Reasonably Available 

Control Technology Demonstration Update the 1997 

23 8-hour Ozone Standard St. Louis Nonattainment Area; 

24 10 CSR 10 6.060 (amendment) I Construction Permits 

Required; 10 CSR 10 6.065 (amendment) I Operating 

MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES 

www.midwestlitigation.com Phone: 1.800.280.3376 Fax: 314.644.1334 
5 

10 

15 

20 

25 

MEETING 3/31/2011 

Page 28 

1 It 1S spirit that we offer our 

2 recommendations to the Mis Department of Natural 

3 Resources. We would be to meet with you and 

4 staff to discuss our comments about the current 

draft of the proposed ation in further detail. 

6 A formal comment letter on proposed amendment s 

7 submitted to the Missouri Department of Natural 

8 Resources. Thank you. 

9 CHAIRMAN GARNETT: Mr. Suraud, thank you 

very much. 

11 MR. SURAUD: you. 

12 CHAIRMAN GARNETT: ffany Drake. 

13 MS. DRAKE: morning again, 

14 Mr. Chairman and members of the Commission. I am 

today to present testimony for the proposed 

16 amendment to 10 CSR 10 5.455, Control of Emission 

17 From Solvent Cleanup The information 

18 associated with this proposed rulemaking begins on 

19 page 297 of the 3rd briefing document. 

Pursuant to Section 183 of the Clean r 

21 Act amendments of 1990, the U.S. Environmental 

22 Protection Agency, or EPA, issued 12 new cont 

23 technique guideline documents known as CTGs from 2006 

24 to 2008 for the control of volatile organ1C compounds 

or voc emissions ozone nonattainment areas. 

MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES 


www.midwestlitigation.com Phone: 1.800.280.3376 Fax: 314.644.1334 

Title 10—DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

Division 10—Air Conservation Commission

Chapter 5—Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution

Control Rules Specific to the St. Louis Metropolitan

Area

PROPOSED AMENDMENT

10 CSR 10-5.455 Control of Emissions from Industrial Solvent

[Cleanup] Cleaning Operations. The commission proposes to

amend the rule title, rule purpose, and section (3) and renumber and

amend sections (1), (2), (4), and (5) of the rule. If the commission

adopts this rule action, it will be the department’s intention to submit this rule amendment to the U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency to replace the current rule that is in the Missouri State

Implementation Plan. The evidence supporting the need for this proposed rulemaking is available for viewing at the Missouri

Department of Natural Resources’ Air Pollution Control Program at

the address listed in the Notice of Public Hearing at the end of this

rule. More information concerning this rulemaking can be found at

the Missouri Department of Natural Resources’ Environmental

Regulatory Agenda website, www.dnr.mo.gov/regs/index.html.

PURPOSE: This rule will reduce the volatile organic compounds

(VOC) emissions from industrial cleaning operations that use organic solvents. This amendment will lower the allowable emissions

threshold for VOCs released per day from the use, storage, and disposal of industrial cleaning solvents. It will also add requirements for

facilities that have VOC emission levels that exceed the threshold,

including placing limitations on the VOC content of the cleaning

materials. The evidence supporting the need for this proposed rulemaking, per section 536.016, RSMo, is the publication by the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency 2006 Control Techniques

Guidelines for industrial cleaning operations and Clean Air Act section 182(b)(2).

PURPOSE: This rule will reduce [solvent emissions from solvent

cleanup operations] the volatile organic compounds emissions

from industrial cleaning operations that use organic solvents.

[(1) Definitions of certain terms specified in this rule may be

found in 10 CSR 10-6.020.]

[(2)](1) Applicability. 

(A) This rule shall apply throughout St. Louis City and the

Counties of Jefferson, St. Charles, Franklin, and St. Louis. 

(B) This rule shall apply to any person who performs or allows the

performance of any cleaning operation involving the use of [a

volatile] organic [compound (VOC)] solvents or solvent solutions.

Except as provided in subsections (1)(C) through (1)(E) of this

rule, the [The] provisions of this rule shall [not] apply to any stationary source [at which cleaning solvent VOCs are emitted at

less than five hundred (500) pounds per day.] that emits at

least three (3) tons per twelve (12)-month rolling period or more

of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from cleaning operations

at the source, in the absence of air pollution control equipment,

and stores and/or disposes of these solvent materials.

(C) The following solvent cleaning operations are not subject to

the provisions of this rule: 

1. Cold cleaner;

2. Open top vapor degreaser;

3. Conveyorized cold cleaner;

4. Conveyorized vapor degreaser;

5. Stripping of cured coatings, cured ink, or cured adhesives;

6. Cleaning operation in printing pre-press or graphic arts

pre-press area, including the cleaning of film processors, color

scanners, plate processors, film cleaning, and plate cleaning;

[5.]7. Nonmanufacturing area cleaning. Nonmanufacturing

areas include cafeterias, laboratories, pilot facilities, restrooms, janitorial cleaning, including graffiti removal, and office buildings;

and

[6. Cleaning operations for which there has been made

a best available control technology (BACT), reasonably available control technology (RACT), or lowest achievable emission rate (LAER) determination; and]

[7.]8. Cleaning operations [which are subject to the

Aerospace National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air

Pollutants Standards (NESHAP) source category.] for emission

units within the following source categories listed for regulation

under section 183(e) of the Clean Air Act:

A. Aerospace coatings;

B. Auto and light duty truck assembly coatings;

C. Fiberglass boat manufacturing materials;

D. Flat wood paneling coatings;

E. Flexible packaging printing materials;

F. Large appliance coatings;

G. Letterpress printing materials;

H. Lithographic printing materials;

I. Metal furniture coatings;

J. Miscellaneous industrial adhesives;

K. Miscellaneous metals parts coatings;

L. Paper, film, and foil coatings;

M. Plastic parts coatings;

N. Shipbuilding and repair coatings; and

O. Wood furniture coatings.

(D) The following solvent cleaning operations are exempt from

the VOC-content limitations specified in subsection (3)(A) of this

rule:

1. Cleaning of solar cells, laser hardware, scientific instruments, and high-precision optics;

2. Cleaning conducted as part of the following: performance

laboratory tests on coatings, adhesives, or inks; research and

development programs; and laboratory tests in quality assurance

laboratories;

3. Cleaning of paper-based gaskets and clutch assemblies

where rubber is bonded to metal by means of an adhesive;

4. Cleaning of cotton swabs to remove cottonseed oil before

cleaning of high-precision optics;

5. Cleaning at medical device and pharmaceutical facilities

using up to one and one-half (1.5) gallons per day of solvents;

6. Cleaning of adhesive application equipment used for thin

metal laminating;

7. Cleaning of electronic or electrical cables;

8. Touch-up cleaning performed on printed circuit boards

where surface mounted devices have already been attached;

9. Cleaning of coating and adhesive application processes

utilized to manufacture transdermal drug delivery product using

less than three (3) gallons per day of ethyl acetate;

10. Cleaning of application equipment used to apply coating

on satellites and radiation effect coatings;

11. Cleaning of application equipment used to apply solventborne fluoropolymer coatings;

12. Cleaning of ultraviolet or electron beam adhesive application;

13. Cleaning of sterilization indicating ink application

equipment if the facility uses less than one and one-half (1.5) gallons per day of solvents for such cleaning;

14. Cleaning of metering rollers, dampening rollers, and

printing plates;

15. Cleaning of numismatic dies; and

16. Cleaning of operations associated with digital printing.

(E) Cleaning with aerosol products shall be exempt from the

requirements of subsection (3)(A) of this rule if the facility uses

one and one-quarter (1.25) gallons (one hundred sixty (160) fluid

ounces) or less of the aerosol products per day.

Page 745 February 15, 2011

Vol. 36, No. 4 Missouri Register
(2) Definitions. Definitions of certain terms specified in this rule

may be found in 10 CSR 10-6.020.

(3) General Provisions. [Any person performing any industrial

cleaning operation, not excluded in subsection (2)(B) or (C),

involving the use of a VOC solvent or solvent solution shall

demonstrate a thirty percent (30%) reduction in plant-wide

industrial VOC cleaning solvent emissions as described in

section (4) of this rule by May 31, 1996.]

(A) VOC-Content Limitations. No owner or operator of a

source subject to this rule shall perform any cleaning operation

subject to this rule unless the owner or operator meets the

requirements in paragraph (3)(A)1., (3)(A)2., or (3)(A)3. of this

rule—

1. The VOC content of the as-used cleaning solutions (minus

water and exempt compounds) shall not exceed the following

emissions limitations:

A. Product cleaning during manufacturing process or surface preparation for coating, adhesive, or ink application.

B. Repair and maintenance cleaning.

C. Cleaning of ink application equipment.

D. All other solvent cleaning operations.

2. The composite vapor pressure of each as-used cleaning

solution used does not exceed eight millimeters of Mercury (8.0

mmHg) measured at twenty degrees Celcius (20 °C) (sixty-eight

degrees Fahrenheit (68 °F)); or

3. An oxidizer or carbon adsorber is installed and operated

that reduces VOC emissions from the subject cleaning operation

by at least eighty-five percent (85%) overall. The owner or operator may use an emission control system other than an afterburner or carbon adsorber if such device reduces VOC emission

from the subject cleaning operation by at least eighty-five percent

(85%) by mass, the owner or operator submits a plan to the

director detailing appropriate monitoring devices, test methods,

record-keeping requirements, and operation parameters for such

a control device, and such a plan is approved by the director and

the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) within federally-enforceable permit conditions.

(B) Cleaning Devices and Methods. The owner or operator of

a facility that is subject to this rule shall employ one (1) or more

of the following cleaning devices and methods:

1. Wipe cleaning;

2. Closed containers or hand-held spray bottles from which

solvents are applied;

3. Cleaning equipment which has a solvent container that

can be, and is, closed during cleaning operations, except when

depositing and removing objects to be cleaned, and is closed during non-operation with the exception of maintenance and repair

to the cleaning equipment itself; and

4. Remote reservoir cleaner, if the operator of the cleaner

complies with all of the following:

A. Prevents solvent vapors from escaping from the solvent

container by using such devices as a cover or a valve when the

remote reservoir is not being used, cleaned, or repaired;

B. Directs solvent flow in a manner that will prevent liquid solvent from splashing outside of the remote reservoir cleaner;

C. Does not clean porous or absorbent materials, such as

cloth, leather, wood, or rope;

D. Uses only solvent containers free of all liquid leaks.

Auxiliary equipment, such as pumps, pipelines, or flanges, shall

not have any liquid leaks, visible tears, or cracks. Any liquid

leak, visible tear, or crack detected shall be repaired within one

(1) calendar day, or the leaking section of the remote reservoir

cold cleaner shall be drained of all solvent and shut down until it

is repaired or replaced;

E. Non-atomized solvent flow method where the cleaning

solvent is collected in a container or a collection system which is

closed except for solvent collection openings and, if necessary,

openings to avoid excessive pressure build-up inside the container; and

F. Solvent flushing method where the cleaning solvent is

discharged into a container which is closed except for solvent collection openings, and, if necessary, other openings to avoid excessive pressure build-up inside the container. The discharged solvent from the equipment must be collected into containers without atomizing into the open air. The solvent may be flushed

through the system by air or hydraulic pressure or by pumping.

Page 746 Proposed Rules

February 15, 2011

Vol. 36, No. 4
(C) Operating Requirements. The owner or operator of a

source subject to the requirements of this section shall comply

with the following for each subject cleaning operation:

1. Cover all open containers and properly cover and store

applicators used to apply cleaning solvents;

2. Dispose of all used cleaning solutions, cleaning towels, and

applicators used to apply cleaning solvents in closed containers

that are nonleaking and nonabsorbent;

3. Minimize air circulation around the cleaning operation;

and

4. Utilize equipment practices that minimize emissions.

(D) Control Device Inspection. For catalytic oxidizers, the catalyst bed material shall be inspected annually for general catalyst

condition and any signs of potential catalyst depletion. The owner

or operator shall also collect a representative sample of the catalyst from the oxidizer, per manufacturer’s recommendations, and

have it tested to evaluate the catalyst’s capability to continue to

function at or above the required control efficiency. An evaluation of the catalyst bed material shall be conducted whenever the

results of the inspection indicate signs of potential catalyst depletion or poor catalyst condition based on manufacturer’s recommendations but not less than once per year.

[(4) Solvent Emission Reduction. The following provisions

apply to any stationary source subject to section (3) of this

rule:

(A) A thirty percent (30%) emission reduction shall be

based on emissions in 1990 and in 1995. If the owner/operator demonstrates that either 1990 or 1995 is not a representative production year, then a demonstration shall be

made to the agency that another year is more representative

for purposes of comparison or for prorating cleaning solvent

usage. The following applicable documentation of actions

and associated emission reductions shall be sent to the

department for approval by March 1, 1996: 

1. Changes in cleaning solvents used;

2. Changes in work practices; and 

3. Changes in equipment or processes; and

(B) The changes described in subsection (4)(A) of this rule

shall remain in effect until other changes resulting in greater,

or equal, emission reductions from the cleaning operations

are implemented.]

[(5) Recordkeeping. The person responsible for industrial

cleaning operations at an affected facility seeking to comply

with section (3) of this rule shall keep records of information

sufficient for the calculation of emissions from each Unit

Operation System (UOS) from the use of industrial cleaning

solvents. A UOS consists of an industrial cleaning operation

around which all organic solvent usage disposal, and fugitive

losses may be calculated using a simple mass balance equation. As an aid to compliance with this section, records for

industrial cleaning UOSs may include one (1) or more of the

following:

(A) Engineering drawings or sketches of all UOSs used to

define industrial cleaning operations within the facility,

including a system boundary, organic solvent input(s), organic solvent output(s), and organic solvent evaporative loss

points. These drawings shall include each of the following: 

1. Labeled boxes within the system boundary which

describe all components of the UOS, including any virgin solvent containers, solvent applicators, used solvent containers,

and the surface being cleaned; 

2. Numbered or lettered arrows depicting liquid and/or

evaporative solvent flow, accurate with respect to relative

mass flow rates in and out of the system boundary; and

3. Arrows depicting all organic solvent pathways within

the system boundary; 

(B) One (1) accurate mass balance equation for each UOS

depicted in subsection (5)(A) of this rule. Each equation shall

have variables consistent with those used to define the corresponding UOS and shall be solved for total VOC emissions

for the UOS; and

(C) Any assumptions or approximations made in defining

the UOSs.]

(4) Reporting and Record Keeping. All owners and operators

subject to this rule shall maintain records as required by this section sufficient to determine continuous compliance with this rule.

These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years to be automatically extended if enforcement action is pending. These

records shall be made available immediately upon request for

review by the Department of Natural Resources’ personnel and

other air pollution control agencies upon presentation of proper

credentials.

(A) The owner or operator of a facility that includes an industrial solvent cleaning operation shall keep records detailing specific VOC uses as necessary for the director to determine monthly compliance. All facility records must include the following:

1. A list of all solvents currently used and/or stored at the

site. The list shall include the following information:

A. Cleaning solvent type by name/code/manufacturer;

B. The actual VOC content of the cleaning solvents, based

upon EPA Method 24, of each cleaning material, in pounds per

gallon of material, as applied or the VOC composite partial

vapor pressures of the solvents or solvent solutions used in the

industrial cleaning operations. This calculation need only be performed once for each batch of cleaning solution used; and

C. The actual mixing ratio for the cleaning solvent as

applied; and

2. Records of usage including the following information:

A. Monthly records of total applied volume in gallons for

each cleaning solvent used;

B. Monthly records of solvent cleaning activity associated

with each solvent used;

C. Monthly records of total volume of aerosol products in

ounces used; and

D. The total monthly VOC emissions (summation of gallons × VOC content (in pounds per gallon)).

(B) If a facility includes automatic equipment, records shall

also include, as applicable, the following:

1. For a source with automatic equipment that prepares

each batch of cleaning solution(s) on site, records for each batch

shall include:

A. The name and identification of each cleaning solution;

B. The VOC content of each cleaning solvent in the cleaning solution;

C. Each change to the setting of the automatic equipment,

with date, time, description of changes in the cleaning solution

constituents (e.g., cleaning solvents), and description of changes

to the proportion of cleaning solvent and water (or other nonVOC);

D. The proportion of each cleaning solvent and water (or

other non-VOC) used to prepare the as-used cleaning solution;

E. The VOC content of the as-used cleaning solution, with

the supporting calculations; and

F. A calibration log for the automatic equipment, detailing periodic checks;

2. For a source with automatic equipment that does not prepare cleaning solution(s) on site, records for each batch of cleaning solution shall include:

A. The name and identification of each cleaning solution;

B. Date, time of preparation, and each subsequent modification of the batch;

C. The VOC content of each cleaning solvent in the cleaning solution;

Page 747 February 15, 2011

Vol. 36, No. 4 Missouri Register
D. The total amount of each cleaning solvent and water

(or other non-VOC) used to prepare the as-used cleaning solution; and

E. The VOC content of the as-used cleaning solution, with

supporting calculations; and 

3. For cleaning solutions that are not prepared at the site,

but are used as-purchased, the manufacturer’s specifications for

VOC content may be used if such manufacturer’s specifications

are based on the results of tests of the VOC content in accordance

with EPA Method 24.

(C) Any owner or operator using an emission control device

pursuant to this rule shall maintain records, on a daily basis, of

key system operating parameters for emission control equipment,

including, but not limited to:

1. Identification of the type of emissions control system used;

2. Hours of operation;

3. Routine and non-routine maintenance, including dates

and duration of any outages;

4. Records of test reports conducted;

5. If an owner or operator of a solvent cleaning operation

employs a thermal oxidizer or catalytic oxidizer to achieve and

maintain compliance, the owner or operator shall comply with

the following requirements:

A. Continuous temperature monitoring and continuous

temperature recording equipment shall be installed and operated

to accurately measure the operating temperature(s) for the control device; and

B. The following information shall be collected and

recorded each day of operation of the solvent cleaning operation

and the control device, and the information shall be maintained

at the facility for a period of five (5) years:

(I) A log or record of the operating time for the control

device, monitoring equipment, and the associated solvent cleaning operation;

(II) For thermal oxidizers, all three (3)-hour periods of

operation during which the average combustion temperature was

more than fifty degrees Fahrenheit (50 °F) below the average

combustion temperature during the most recent emission test

that demonstrated that the solvent cleaning operation was in

compliance; and

(III) For catalytic oxidizers, all three (3)-hour periods of

operation during which the average temperature of the dryer

exhaust gases immediately before the catalyst bed was more than

fifty degrees Fahrenheit (50 °F) below the average temperature of

the dryer exhaust gases during the most recent emission test that

demonstrated that the solvent cleaning operation was in compliance, and all three (3)-hour periods during which the average

temperature difference across the catalyst bed was less than

eighty percent (80%) of the average temperature difference during the most recent emission test that demonstrated that the solvent cleaning operation was in compliance; and

6. If an owner or operator of a solvent cleaning operation

employs a carbon adsorption system to achieve and maintain

compliance, the owner or operator shall comply with the following requirements:

A. Monitoring and recording equipment that records all

of the following shall be installed and operated for the carbon

adsorption system:

(I) A continuous emission monitoring and recording

system that is capable of accurately measuring and recording the

concentration of organic compounds in the exhaust gases from

the carbon adsorption system;

(II) Monitoring and recording equipment that are capable of accurately measuring and recording the total mass steam

flow rate for each regeneration cycle of each carbon bed; and

(III) Monitoring and recording equipment that are

capable of accurately measuring and recording the temperature

of each carbon bed after regeneration (and after completion of

any cooling cycle(s)); and

B. The following information shall be collected and

recorded each day of operation of the solvent cleaning operation

and the carbon adsorption system:

(I) A log or record of the operating time for the carbon

adsorption system, monitoring equipment, and the associated

solvent cleaning operation;

(II) For a carbon adsorption system that employs a continuous emission monitoring and recording system to measure

and record the concentration of organic compounds in the

exhaust gases, all three (3)-hour periods of operation during

which the average concentration level or reading in the exhaust

gases is more than twenty percent (20%) greater than the exhaust

gas organic compound concentration level or reading measured

by the most recent performance test that demonstrated that the

solvent cleaning operation was in compliance;

(III) For a carbon adsorption system that employs monitoring and recording equipment to measure and record the total

mass steam flow rate for each regeneration cycle of each carbon

bed, all carbon bed regeneration cycles during which the total

mass steam flow rate was more than ten percent (10%) below the

total mass steam flow rate during the most recent performance

test that demonstrated that the solvent cleaning operation was in

compliance; and

(IV) For a carbon adsorption system that employs monitoring and recording equipment to measure and record the temperature of each carbon bed after regeneration (and after completion of any cooling cycle(s)) was more than ten percent (10%)

greater than the carbon bed temperature during the most recent

performance test that demonstrated that the solvent cleaning

operation was in compliance.

(5) Test Methods. Certain test methods mentioned in this rule

may be found in 10 CSR 10-6.030. Other EPA test methods specific to this rule may be found in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A.

(A) Control Efficiency Testing. To demonstrate compliance

with the emission limits of subsection (3)(C) of this rule, an initial emission test shall be performed after any required control

equipment is installed. The emission limits shall not have been

met until compliance has been verified through this testing.

Testing shall also be required after significant modifications to

any control equipment required by this rule. Significant modifications include any repairs or changes that might substantially

alter or affect the overall control efficiency. This subsection outlines the methods to be used for any such testing.

1. The emission unit shall be run at typical operating conditions and flow rates compatible with scheduled production during any emission testing.

2. EPA Method 1 or 1A, as appropriate, shall be used to

select the sampling sites.

3. EPA Method 2, 2A, 2C, or 2D, as appropriate, shall be

used to determine the velocity and volumetric flow rate of the

exhaust stream.

4. EPA Method 3 or 3A, as appropriate, shall be used to

determine the concentration of Oxygen (O2) and Carbon Dioxide

(CO2).

5. EPA Method 4 shall be used to determine moisture content.

6. EPA Method 18, 25, or 25A shall be used to determine the

VOC concentration of the exhaust stream entering and exiting the

control device, unless the alternate limit in paragraph (3)(C)2. of

this rule is being used for compliance, in which case only the

VOC concentration of the exit exhaust shall be determined. In

cases where the anticipated outlet VOC concentration of the control device is less than fifty parts per million by volume (50

ppmv) as carbon, EPA Method 25A shall be used.

7. If EPA Method 25A is used— 

Page 748 Proposed Rules

February 15, 2011

Vol. 36, No. 4
A. The outlet readings from a thermal or catalytic oxidizer may be corrected by using EPA Method 18 or 25 to determine

non-VOC components (methane and ethane) and subtracting

these from the Method 25A result; and

B. The director may require a retest by EPA Method 18 or

25 if the average corrected outlet reading is greater than fifty (50)

ppmv VOC as carbon.

8. A compliance test shall consist of up to three (3) separate

runs, each lasting a minimum of sixty (60) minutes unless the

director determines that the circumstances dictate shorter sampling times. 

9. EPA Method 25 specifies a minimum probe temperature

of two hundred sixty-five degrees Fahrenheit (265 °F). To prevent

condensation, the probe should be heated to at least the gas

stream temperature, typically close to three hundred fifty

degrees Fahrenheit (350 °F).

10. EPA Method 25A specifies a minimum temperature of

two hundred twenty degrees Fahrenheit (220 °F) for the sampling

components leading to the analyzer. To prevent condensation

when testing heatset printing presses, the sampling components

and flame ionization detector lock should be heated to at least the

gas stream temperature, typically close to three hundred fifty

degrees Fahrenheit (350 °F).

11. The oxidizer operating temperature or the temperature

of the gas upstream of the catalyst bed may be used as the operating parameter for determining continuous compliance with the

emission standard of subsection (3)(C) of this rule. This temperature shall be computed as the time-weighted average of the temperature values recorded during the test. The owner or operator

must maintain the oxidizer at a three (3)-hour average temperature no less than fifty degrees Fahrenheit (50 °F) below the average temperature observed during the most recent stack test to

demonstrate continuous compliance.

12. Use of an adaptation to any of the methods specified in

this subsection may be approved by the director on a case-by-case

basis. The owner or operator shall submit sufficient documentation for the director to find that the methods specified in this subsection will yield inaccurate results and that the proposed adaptation is appropriate.

13. To determine capture efficiency, use the procedure in 10

CSR 10-6.030(20).

(B) VOC Content Testing for Cleaning Solutions. The VOC

content or VOC composite partial vapor pressure of cleaning

solutions shall be determined by one (1) of the following: 

1. Analysis by EPA Method 24 for VOC content or by an

appropriate method for VOC composite partial vapor pressure of

a sample of the cleaning solution. The analysis may be performed

by the supplier of those materials;

2. Calculation for VOC content that combines EPA Method

24 analytical data for the concentrated materials used to prepare

the cleaning solution and the proportions in which they are mixed

to make the cleaning solution as applied. Owners or operators

may use formulation information provided with the concentrated

materials used to prepare the cleaning solution, such as the container label, the product data sheet, or the Material Safety Data

Sheet (MSDS) to document the VOC content of the concentrated

material; or

3. If cleaning is not diluted prior to use, MSDS or manufacturer’s formulation data sheet may be used.

AUTHORITY: section 643.050, RSMo Supp. [1995] 2010. Original

rule filed Oct. 7, 1994, effective May 28, 1995. Amended: Filed July

15, 1996, effective Feb. 28, 1997. Amended: Filed Nov. 30, 2010.

PUBLIC COST: This proposed amendment will not cost state agencies or political subdivisions more than five hundred dollars ($500)

in the aggregate.

PRIVATE COST: This proposed amendment will not cost private entities more than five hundred dollars ($500) in the aggregate.

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND NOTICE TO SUBMIT COMMENTS: A public hearing on this proposed amendment will begin at

9:00 a.m., March 31, 2011. The public hearing will be held at Elm

Street Conference Center, 1730 East Elm Street, Lower Level,

Bennett Springs Conference Room, Jefferson City, Missouri.

Opportunity to be heard at the hearing shall be afforded any interested person. Interested persons, whether or not heard, may submit

a written or email statement of their views until 5:00 p.m., April 7,

2011. Written comments shall be sent to Chief, Air Quality Planning

Section, Missouri Department of Natural Resources’ Air Pollution

Control Program, PO Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0176.

Email comments shall be sent to apcprulespn@dnr.mo.gov.

Title 10—DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

Division 10—Air Conservation Commission

Chapter 6—Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling

and Reference Methods and Air Pollution Control 

Regulations for the Entire State of Missouri

PROPOSED AMENDMENT

10 CSR 10-6.020 Definitions and Common Reference Tables. The

commission proposes to amend subsections (2)(A)–(2)(J) and

(2)(L)–(2)(W). If the commission adopts this rule action, it will be the

department’s intention to submit this rule amendment to the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency to replace the current rule that is in

the Missouri State Implementation Plan. The evidence supporting the

need for this proposed rulemaking is available for viewing at the

Missouri Department of Natural Resources’ Air Pollution Control

Program at the address listed in the Notice of Public Hearing at the end

of this rule. More information concerning this rulemaking can be found

at the Missouri Department of Natural Resources’ Environmental

Regulatory Agenda website, www.dnr.mo.gov/regs/index.html.

PURPOSE: This rule defines key words and expressions used in

Chapters 1 through 6 and provides common reference tables. This

amendment will add all of the definitions currently found in individual Division 10 air rules into the general definitions rule unless a

specific reason exists for a definition to be unique to a specific rule.

The evidence supporting the need for this proposed rulemaking, per

section 536.016, RSMo, is public hearing testimony.

PURPOSE: This rule defines key words and expressions used in

[c]Chapters 1 through 6 and provides common reference tables.

(2) Definitions.

(A) All terms beginning with “A.”

1. Abatement project designer—An individual who designs or

plans Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) asbestos

abatement.

2. Account certificate of representation—The completed and

signed submission for certifying the designation of a nitrogen

oxides (NOx) authorized account representative for an affected

unit or a group of identified affected units who is authorized to

represent the owners or operators of such unit(s) and of the

affected units at such source(s) with regard to matters under an

NOx trading program.

3. Account holder—Any person that chooses to participate

in the program by generating, buying, selling, or trading emission reduction credits (ERCs).

4. Account number—The identification number given to

each NOx allowance tracking system account.

5. Acid rain emissions limitation—As defined in 40 CFR

72.2, a limitation on emissions of sulfur dioxide or nitrogen

Page 749 February 15, 2011

Vol. 36, No. 4 Missouri Register
Title 10—DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

Division 10—Air Conservation Commission

Chapter 5—Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution

Control Rules Specific to the St. Louis Metropolitan

Area

ORDER OF RULEMAKING

By the authority vested in the Missouri Air Conservation

Commission under section 643.050, RSMo 2000, the commission

amends a rule as follows:

10 CSR 10-5.455 is amended.

A notice of proposed rulemaking containing the text of the proposed

amendment was published in the Missouri Register on February 15,

2011 (36 MoReg 745–749). Those sections with changes are reprinted here. This proposed amendment becomes effective thirty (30) days

after publication in the Code of State Regulations.

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS: The Missouri Department of

Natural Resources’ Air Pollution Control Program received four (4)

comments from two (2) sources, the American Coatings Association

(ACA) and the St. Louis County Air Pollution Control Program. The

ACA requested that their represented industries be exempted from the

rule, or if this request was not possible, provided language to better

accommodate the needs of their industry. St. Louis County Air

Pollution Control Program requested that language be added to the

rule to further explain how affected entities can show the rule no

longer applies to them. 

COMMENT #1: The ACA opposes Missouri’s adoption of the

Industrial Solvent Cleaning Control Technique Guidelines (CTG) for

coatings, inks, and resin manufacturing operations based on claims

that the proposed amendment does not allow effective cleaning and

because Missouri already has an applicable regulation, 10 CSR 10-

5.390, that requires covers on all tanks containing volatile organic

compounds (VOCs) used for cleaning equipment. 

RESPONSE: Missouri is following the guidance provided by EPA in

the CTG that exempts industries that are specifically listed for regulation under Section 183(e) of the Clean Air Act. In addition, specific exemptions that have been included by other state CTG rules

have been incorporated into this rulemaking. No other state rule has

exempted this industry. In addition, the requirements listed in the

amendment to this rule are much more specific and cover much more

of the cleaning operation work practices than just covering tanks containing VOCs used for cleaning. Therefore, no change was made to

the amendment text as a result of this comment.

COMMENT #2: If Missouri does not exempt solvent cleaning at

coating, inks, and resin manufacturing operations, the ACA recommends adding regulatory language that is currently being adopted by

the states of Wisconsin, Ohio, and Illinois. This language includes

alternative compliance options for coating, inks, and resin manufacturers and requires one (1) or more of the requirements be met.

RESPONSE AND EXPLANATION OF CHANGE: Specific groups

have concerns that address cleaning issues specific to their industry.

Allowances were made in the proposed rulemaking to address various industries. Therefore, in order to accommodate the manufacturers of coatings, inks, and resins, allowances for higher level content

of VOCs and an option including an allowable amount of fresh solvent have been incorporated into the rule as new subsections (1)(F),

(1)(G), and (3)(E). Along with the accommodations, the rule will

require good work practices such as keeping containers covered and

maintaining leak free equipment.

COMMENT #3: The St. Louis County Air Pollution Control

Program suggested, in order to be consistent with other rules and

provide sources with an option to opt out of the rule requirements,

adding language to clarify that a source may show they have become

exempt from the rule once their actual emissions drop below three (3)

tons and the facility can demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the director, that total actual VOC emissions is less than three (3) tons per

twelve (12)-month rolling period for five (5) consecutive twelve (12)-

month periods. 

RESPONSE AND EXPLANATION OF CHANGE: In order to provide clarity to sources on how to become exempt from the rule once

it no longer applies to them, a new subsection (1)(H) was added to

the applicability section of the rule.

COMMENT #4: The St. Louis County Air Pollution Control

Program commented that they support the amendments.

RESPONSE: The Missouri Department of Natural Resources’ Air

Pollution Control Program appreciates the support. No change was

made to the amendment text as a result of this comment.

10 CSR 10-5.455 Control of Emissions from Industrial Solvent

Cleaning Operations

(1) Applicability. 

(B) This rule shall apply to any person who performs or allows the

performance of any cleaning operation involving the use of organic

solvents or solvent solutions. Except as provided in subsections

(1)(C) through (1)(G) of this rule, the provisions of this rule shall

apply to any stationary source that emits at least three (3) tons per

twelve (12)-month rolling period or more of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from cleaning operations at the source, in the

absence of air pollution control equipment, and stores and/or disposes of these solvent materials.

(F) Cleaning operations at a manufacturer of coatings, inks, or

resins are exempt from subsections (3)(A) and (3)(B) of this rule. 

(G) Subsection (3)(E) applies to manufacturers of coatings, inks,

and resins only.

(H) Once a source has exceeded the applicability level of this rule,

it shall remain subject to this rule even if its actual emissions drop

below the applicability level of this rule until it can demonstrate, to

the satisfaction of the director, that the total actual VOC emissions

from solvent cleaning operations, before consideration of controls, is

less than three (3) tons per twelve (12)-month rolling period for sixty

(60) consecutive months. 

(3) General Provisions. 

(E) Requirements for coatings, inks, and resin manufacturers.

Coating, ink, and resin manufacturers must comply with the following requirements:

1. Clean portable or stationary mixing vats, high dispersion

mills, grinding mills, tote tanks, and roller mills by one (1) or more

of the following methods:

A. Use a solvent or solvent solution that either contains less

than 1.67 pounds per gallon (0.20 kilograms per liter) of VOC or has

a composite vapor pressure no more than eight millimeters of mercury (8.0 mmHg) at twenty degrees Celsius (20 °C); 

B. Collect and vent the emissions from equipment cleaning to

a VOC emission control system that has an overall capture and control efficiency of at least eighty percent (80%) by weight for the VOC

emissions. Where such reduction is achieved by incineration, at least

ninety percent (90%) of the organic carbon shall be oxidized to carbon dioxide; or

C. Use organic solvents other than those allowed in subparagraph (3)(E)1.A. of this rule provided no more than sixty (60) gallons (two hundred twenty-eight (228) liters) of fresh solvent shall be

used per month. Organic solvent that is reused or recycled (either

onsite or offsite), for further use in equipment cleaning or the manufacture of coating, is not included in this limit;

2. Work practices while cleaning shall include:

A. Equipment being cleaned must be maintained leak free;

Page 1669 July 1, 2011

Vol. 36, No. 13 Missouri Register
July 1, 2011

Vol. 36, No. 13

B. VOC-containing cleaning materials must be drained from

the cleaned equipment upon completion of cleaning;

C. VOC-containing cleaning materials, including waste solvents, shall not be stored or disposed of in such a manner that will

cause or allow evaporation into the atmosphere; and 

D. Store all VOC-containing materials in closed containers;

and

3. When using solvent for wipe cleaning, the owner or operator

of a facility shall:

A. Not use open containers for the storage or disposal of

cloth or paper impregnated with organic compounds that is used for

cleanup or coating, ink, or resin removal; and

B. Not store spent or fresh organic compounds to be used for

cleanup or coating, ink, or resin removal in open containers.

Title 10—DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

Division 10—Air Conservation Commission

Chapter 6—Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling

and Reference Methods and Air Pollution Control 

Regulations for the Entire State of Missouri

ORDER OF RULEMAKING

By the authority vested in the Missouri Air Conservation

Commission under section 643.050, RSMo 2000, the commission

amends a rule as follows:

10 CSR 10-6.020 is amended.

A notice of proposed rulemaking containing the text of the proposed

amendment was published in the Missouri Register on February 15,

2011 (36 MoReg 749–784). Those sections with changes are reprinted here. This proposed amendment becomes effective thirty (30)

days after publication in the Code of State Regulations.

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS: The Missouri Department of

Natural Resources received thirteen (13) comments from six (6)

sources including the Treated Wood Council, the Missouri Forest

Products Association, the Missouri Hospital Association, Newman,

Comley & Ruth, P.C., Printing Industries of St. Louis, Inc., and the

St. Louis County Air Pollution Control Program. 

COMMENT #1: The Treated Wood Council and the Missouri Forest

Products Association both commented on their concern as to what

qualifies as a renewable fuel as defined by the term in paragraph

(2)(R)27. Both parties requested that treated wood be included as a

renewable energy source for use at facilities that satisfied all pertinent environmental requirements and obtained the necessary permits.

RESPONSE AND EXPLANATION OF CHANGE: The definition

for renewable fuel as found in paragraph (2)(R)27. originates from a

rule that was defining renewable fuel for use in cement kilns. It was

not the intent of the definition to define renewable fuel across all

potential uses of the term. Therefore, text has been added to the

beginning of the definition clarifying that the term is defined only for

use with the cement kiln emission rule 10 CSR 10-6.380. 

COMMENT #2: The Missouri Hospital Association (MHA) requested that the definitions for the terms hospital and low-level radioactive waste be replaced with the definitions defined in Missouri

statute. MHA also requested that the definition for medical/infectious waste be replaced with the definition used by the Department

of Natural Resources’ Solid Waste Program.

RESPONSE: All three (3) definitions in the proposed rulemaking are

consistent with definitions in the federal rule 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart

Ec. These definitions are used in rule 10 CSR 10-6.200 Hospital,

Medical, Infectious Waste Incinerators. In order for this rulemaking

to be federally approvable, the definitions must be consistent with the

air portion of the Code of Federal Regulations. Therefore, no changes

were made to the rule as a result of these comments.

COMMENT #3: Newman, Comley & Ruth, P.C. commented that

the definition of air pollutant allows the staff director to identify precursors to the formation of any air pollutant, and this may exceed

authority granted under provisions of state statues. 

RESPONSE AND EXPLANATION OF CHANGE: This definition

was moved from 10 CSR 10-6.065 and originated from a federal definition. When this definition was added to 10 CSR 10-6.065, the federal term of administrator was replaced with staff director. This type

of replacement was common any time federal rules and definitions

were incorporated into state rules. However, in this case it did not

make sense. The staff director has never identified precursors for this

purpose. As a result of this comment, the definition has been

changed to reflect that only the administrator of the EPA or the

administrator’s duly authorized representative is permitted to identify precursor(s).

COMMENT #4: Printing Industries of St. Louis, Inc. have requested additions to the definitions of batch and press in the proposed

rulemaking and have recommended adding the term fountain solution

reservoir to the definitions rule in order to facilitate understanding of

10 CSR 10-5.442 Control of Emissions from Lithographic Printing

Operations.

RESPONSE AND EXPLANATION OF CHANGE: As a result of

this comment, changes were made to the definitions of batch and

press and the term fountain solution reservoir was added to help in

the understanding of the affected rules. 

COMMENT #5: St. Louis County Air Pollution Control Program

recommended that the definition of reporting year be updated to

reflect the latest definition found in 10 CSR 10-6.110 Reporting

Emission Data, Emission Fees, and Process Information and the definition for Consolidated Emissions Reporting Rule (CERR) be deleted as it will no longer be used when the definition of reporting year

is updated. Also, the term peak ozone season should be deleted as

it is not used anywhere in the air rules.

RESPONSE AND EXPLANATION OF CHANGE: As recommended, the definition of reporting year has been updated based on the

current definition in 10 CSR 10-6.110, and peak ozone season was

deleted. In addition, Consolidated Emissions Reporting Rule was

deleted because it is obsolete and has been superseded by the federal Air Emissions Report Rule.

COMMENT #6: St. Louis Air Pollution Control Program noted that

definitions exist for both emission inventory and inventory and suggested that one (1) of the definitions be eliminated, or both should at

least be reviewed to assure that both definitions are appropriate and

consistent.

RESPONSE AND EXPLANATION OF CHANGE: Emission inventory is a new definition that was incorporated due to an amendment

to 10 CSR 10-6.300. The term inventory has been in 10 CSR 10-

6.020 for an extended period of time. Therefore, in order for the

term inventory to be removed, a review of the rules was performed

to determine if the term emissions inventory is an appropriate

replacement. This review was done and it was determined that the

term inventory is redundant and can be deleted from 10 CSR 10-

6.020.

COMMENT #7: St. Louis Air Pollution Control Program commented that there are two (2) different definitions for emission and emissions. Emission appears to be a general term and emissions appears

to be specifically for the nitrogen oxides (NOx) budget rule. If that

is the case, clarification should be added to the emissions definition

to reflect its specific usage. 

RESPONSE AND EXPLANATION OF CHANGE: In order to provide greater clarity regarding definitions of terms and where rule

Page 1670 Orders of Rulemaking