alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2.95 Early termination from supervision. ( a ) ( 1 ) Upon its own motion or upon request of a parolee, the Commission may terminate a parolee's supervision, and legal custody over the parolee, before the sentence expires.
( 2 ) The Commission may terminate supervision of a committed youth offender after the offender serves one year on supervision. Upon terminating supervision before the sentence expires, the Commission shall set aside the committed youth offender's conviction and issue a certificate setting aside the conviction instead of a certificate of termination.
( b ) Two years after releasing a prisoner on supervision, and at least annually thereafter, the Commission shall review the status of the parolee to determine the need for continued supervision. The Commission shall also conduct a status review whenever the supervision officer recommends early termination of the parolee's supervision.
( c ) Five years after releasing a prisoner on supervision, the Commission shall terminate supervision over the parolee unless the Commission determines, after a hearing conducted in accordance with the procedures prescribed in 18 U.S.C. 4214(a)(2), that such supervision should not be terminated because there is a likelihood that the parolee will engage in conduct violating any criminal law. If the Commission does not terminate supervision under this paragraph, the parolee may request a hearing annually thereafter, and the Commission shall conduct an early termination hearing at least every two years.
( d ) In calculating the two-year and five-year periods provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, the Commission shall not include any period of parole before the most recent release, or any period the parolee served in confinement on any other sentence.
( e ) ( 1 ) In determining whether to grant early termination from supervision, the Commission shall consider the guidelines of this paragraph (e). The guidelines are advisory and the Commission may disregard the outcome indicated by the guidelines based on case-specific factors. Termination of supervision is indicated if the parolee: ( i ) Has a salient factor score in the very good risk category and has completed two continuous years of supervision free from an incident of new criminal behavior or serious parole violation; or
( ii ) Has a salient factor score in a risk category other than very good and has completed three continuous years of supervision free from an incident of new criminal behavior or serious parole violation.
( 2 ) As used in this paragraph (e), the term “an incident of new criminal behavior or serious parole violation” includes a new arrest or report of a parole violation if supported by substantial evidence of guilt, even if no conviction or parole revocation results. The Commission shall not terminate supervision of a parolee until it determines the disposition of a pending criminal charge.
( 3 ) Case-specific factors that may justify a departure either above or below the early termination guidelines may relate to the current behavior of the parolee, or to the parolee's background and criminal history.
[75 FR 9520, Mar. 3, 2010]
### §3313. Grants for reports and plans for coordinated research, enforcement, etc.

The Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior, is authorized to establish a program to provide grants to prepare reports and plans provided for in this subchapter and subchapter III in order to promote coordinated research, enforcement, enhancement, and management of the salmon and steelhead resources within the Washington and Columbia River conservation areas consistent with the purposes of this chapter. Such grants shall be available for use by the State of Washington, the State of Oregon, appropriate tribal coordinating bodies, or any joint governmental entity established for undertaking research, or providing advice on or mechanisms for coordinating management or enforcement, or preparing the reports and plans described in this subchapter and subchapter III.

(Pub. L. 96–561, title I, §112, Dec. 22, 1980, 94 Stat. 3279.)
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.1

                               APPLIED POWER INC.
                    FISCAL 2000 MANAGEMENT BONUS ARRANGEMENT

For the first six months of fiscal year 2000, Mr. Richard G. Sim's bonus will be
100% based on the Company's year-over-year EVA performance. Mr. William J.
Albrecht's and Mr. Gustav H.P. Boel's bonuses will be based 50% on the Company's
year-over-year EVA performance and 50% on the year-over-year improvement in CMM
of their respective businesses.

Actual Six-Month Bonus Paid = Annual Bonus Award x 0.5 x Multiplier (see below)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                             Multiplier
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  Year-Over-Year Ratio Converts to Multiplier as Detailed Below
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                 <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
Year-Over-Year Ratio                0.80        1.00        1.15        1.30        1.45        1.60

Multiplier                           0.0         0.5         1.0         1.5         2.0         2.5

                                                    Multiplier Capped at 2.5
</TABLE>

CMM = Earnings Before Interest, Taxes and Amortization (EBITA)  -  20% Net
Assets

EVA = Adjusted Net Operating Profit After Taxes minus a Capital Charge

Previous period measures are restated to include all acquisitions and
divestitures and to exclude one-time, non-operating items for comparative
purposes.
#### James Martin SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Douglas GONZALES et al., Defendants, Douglas Gonzales and Ossie B. Brown, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 78-2918

Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 2, 1979.

Andrew J. Ruzicho, Asst. Atty. Gen., Columbus, Ohio, for plaintiff-appellant.

Watson, Blanche, Wilson & Posner, George K. Anding, Jr., Baton Rouge, La., for defendants.

Before GOLDBERG, RONEY and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges.

*

 Rule 18, 5 Cir.; *see Isbell Enterprises, Inc.*v. *Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al.,*5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the dismissal of two parties in a multiparty case in which one defendant remains a party. Since there has been neither a final judgment entered nor a determination by the district court that there is no just reason for delay pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b), either applied for by the parties or issued by the district court, we lack jurisdiction to entertain this appeal.

The appeal must be dismissed even though the parties do not object to the lack of a certificate. *Graham*v. *Cole,*483 F.2d 255 (5th Cir. 1973); *Ronel Corp. v. Anchor Lock of Florida, Inc.,*312 F.2d 207 (5th Cir. 1963).

APPEAL DISMISSED.
### §8101. Definition

In this Act, the term "United States person" means—

(1) any United States resident or national,

(2) any domestic concern (including any permanent domestic establishment of any foreign concern), and

(3) any foreign subsidiary or affiliate (including any permanent foreign establishment) of any domestic concern that is controlled in fact by such domestic concern,

except that such term does not include an individual who resides outside the United States and is employed by an individual or entity other than an individual or entity described in paragraph (1), (2), or (3).

(Pub. L. 110–403, §3, Oct. 13, 2008, 122 Stat. 4257.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 110–403, Oct. 13, 2008, 122 Stat. 4256, known as the Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property Act of 2008, which enacted this chapter and enacted, amended, and repealed numerous other sections and notes in the Code. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note below and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 110–403, §1(a), Oct. 13, 2008, 122 Stat. 4256, provided that: "This Act [enacting this chapter, section 2323 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and sections 3713a to 3713d of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, amending sections 1116 and 1117 of this title, sections 109, 111, 115, 119, 122, 411, 412, 503, 506, 601, and 602 of Title 17, Copyrights, sections 1834 and 2318 to 2320 of Title 18, section 1595a of Title 19, Customs Duties, and section 3713 of Title 42, and repealing section 1128 of this title and section 509 of Title 17] may be cited as the 'Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property Act of 2008'."
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.31

                                  AMENDMENT TO
                             THE QUANEX CORPORATION
                  1997 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK OPTION PLAN


         THIS AGREEMENT by Quanex Corporation (the "Company"),

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

         WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company previously adopted the
plan agreement known as the "Quanex Corporation 1997 Non-Employee Director Stock
Option Plan" (the "Plan"); and

         WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company retained the right in
Article IV of the Plan to amend the Plan from time to time; and

         WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has approved the
following amendment to the Plan;

         NOW, THEREFORE, effective January 1, 2000, the Board of Directors of
the Company agrees that Section 3.6 the Plan is hereby amended, effective with
respect to all Options issued in the future under this Plan, as follows:

         3.6      DURATION OF OPTIONS.

                  Each Option awarded, to the extent it shall not previously
         have been exercised, shall terminate on the earlier of the following
         dates:

                           (i) on the last day within the three month period
                  commencing on the date on which the Optionee ceases to be a
                  director of the Company, for any reason other than death,
                  Retirement or Disability; or

                           (ii) ten years after the date of grant of such
                  Option.

                  If the Optionee ceases to be a director of the Company due to
         his death, Disability or Retirement, his Option shall continue to vest
         after such cessation of service as a director for a period of not
         longer than three years commencing on the



<PAGE>   2


         date of the Optionee's death, disability or Retirement until the Option
         expires upon the earlier of date of the expiration of such three-year
         period or ten years after the grant of the Option.

Dated: December 9, 1999.


                                       -2-
تأكد من أنه یغطي أنفك وفمك للمساعدة في حمایة الآخرین. 

ً قد تكون مصابا ولا تظهر علیك أعراض.

عد 6 أقدام (طول ذراعین) من الأشخاص الآخرین.

َ ابق على بُ

ِ وارتد ً غطاء ً للوجھ مصنوعا من القماش

التزم بتدابیر التباعد الجسدي

ساعد في حمایة نفسك والآخرین من الإصابة بمرض كوفید19-

cdc.gov/coronavirus

CS 317297-C 05/29/2020
----- Forwarded by Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/18/2011 03:14 PM----- 

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Thomas 

 Gillis/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Robin Dunkins/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Nick 

 Hilosky/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jim 

 Eddinger/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 02/01/2011 08:57 AM 

Subject:FW: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Boiler MACT and WISWI Rules 

Hi all, 

Consistent with our executive order, attached are the handouts from the 

EO 12866 meeting yesterday. Please let me know if you have any 

questions. 

Regards, 

Cortney 

-----Original Appointment----- 

From: Echols, Mabel E. 

Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 3:03 PM 

To: Echols, Mabel E.; Neyland, Kevin F.; Mancini, Dominic J.; Higgins, 

Cortney; Lee, Amanda I.; MacNeil, John S.; Rackoff, Jonathan E.; 

tsirigotis.peter@epamail.epa.gov; wayland.robertj@epamail.epa.gov;

gillis.thomas@epa.gov; Dunkins.Robin@epamail.epa.gov;

Hilosky.Nick@epamail.epa.gov; Keohane, Nathaniel; Levinson, Arik; Patel, 

Manisha; Utech, Dan G. 

Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Boiler MACT and WISWI Rules 

When: Monday, January 31, 2011 11:00 AM-11:30 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern 

Time (US & Canada). 

Where: 10103 NEOB 

When: Monday, January 31, 2011 11:00 AM-11:30 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern 

Time (US & Canada). 

Where: 10103 NEOB 

Note: The GMT offset above does not reflect daylight saving time 

adjustments. 

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* 

Susan Bodine, Barnes & Thornburg has requested this meeting on behalf of 

The Used Oil Management Association. 

(See attached file: Jan31_2011_NHSW_Handout1.pdf) 

(See attached file:Jan31_2011_NHSW_Handout2.pdf) 

(See attached file:Jan31_2011_NHSW_Handout3.pdf) 

(See attached file:Jan31_2011_NHSW_Handout4.pdf) 

(See attached file:Jan31_2011_NHSW_Handout5.pdf)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 99897 / April 3, 2024

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-21717

In the Matter of

Fieldman Rolapp & Associates, Inc.

and Anna Sarabian,

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER APPOINTING 

TAX ADMINISTRATOR

On May 4, 2022, the Commission issued an Omnibus Order Directing the Engagement of 

Two Tax Administrators for Appointment on a Case-By-Case Basis in Administrative 

Proceedings that Establish Distribution Funds (the “Omnibus Order”).1 The Omnibus Order 

engaged Miller Kaplan Arase LLP and Heffler, Radetich & Saitta, LLP to serve as the 

Commission’s tax administrator (“Tax Administrator”), for selection and appointment on an 

individual case basis, for calendar years 2022 through 2024 in administrative proceedings where 

the distribution fund may incur tax-related obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) 

under the Department of the Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

The Director of the Division of Enforcement is authorized to appoint a Tax Administrator 

pursuant to the Omnibus Order.2 The Commission staff has requested the appointment of 

Heffler, Radetich & Saitta, LLP as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced 

proceeding.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the Omnibus Order, Heffler, Radetich & 

Saitta, LLP is appointed as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding. 

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.3

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 94845 (May 4, 2022).

2

 See Delegation of Authority to Director of the Division of Enforcement, Securities Act Rel. No. 10900 (Dec. 10, 

2020).

3

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(ii).
#### § 620.201 Purpose.

To prescribe Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) procedures relating to relinquishment of highway facilities.
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: October 30, 2014 TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket I d: OAR

– 2013 - 0602 FROM: Howard J. Hoffman , EPA - OGC SUBJECT: October 30, 2014 Phone Call with EDF Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan

for Existing Power Plants **SUMMARY** On October 30, 2014, EPA

– OGC discussed legal issues concerning the proposed Clean Power Plan for existing power plants with the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF). **ATTENDEES** Howard J. Hoffman (EPA - OGC) Jonathan Skinner - Thompson (EPA - OGC) Megan Ceronsk y (EDF) Sean Donahue (Goldberg & Donahue)
#### Jefferson *v.*Glaze.

Beck, J.

Where a landlord sues out a warrant to dispossess his tenani because of non-payment of rent under a lease contract, and the tenant arrests such proceedings by filing a counter-affidavit and giving the required .bond, and where the allegations contained in the counter-affidavit show that the landlord was indebted to the tenant at the time of *843suing out the warrant, *by*reason of damages resulting from the failure of the landlord *to comply*with certain obligations imposed upon him under the terms of the contract,, and there is some evidence to support such allegations, it is error for the court to direct a verdict in favor of the landlord for double the amount of rent claimed to be due; as it is competent for the tenant, in proceedings of the nature indicated, under proper pleadings, to recoup the damages which lie has sustained. *Weaver*v. *Roberson,*134 *Ga.*140 (67 S. E. 662).

July 15, 1910.

Eviction. Before Judge Gilbert. Muscogee superior court.

April 3, 1910.

*Hatcher & Hatcher,*for plaintiff in error.

*Bowden & Goldstein*and *Carson & McCutchen,*contra.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

Evans, P. J.

I concur in the judgment, but dissent from the intimation of the majority of the court that the tenant may recoup damages arising out of the landlord’s violation of his contract. I think the tenant may defeat the action by showing that he has suffered damages to the amount of the rent or in excess thereof, but the tenant can not recover any damages in excess of the rent by way of recoupment, in a dispossessory proceeding.
§ 41.52 General prohibitions against employment discrimination. ( a ) No qualified handicapped person shall, on the basis of handicap, be subjected to discrimination in employment under any program or activity that receives or benefits from federal financial assistance.
( b ) A recipient shall make all decisions concerning employment under any program or activity to which this part applies in a manner which ensures that discrimination on the basis of handicap does not occur and may not limit, segregate, or classify applicants or employees in any way that adversely affects their opportunities or status because of handicap.
( c ) The prohibition against discrimination in employment applies to the following activities: ( 1 ) Recruitment, advertising, and the processing of applications for employment;
( 2 ) Hiring, upgrading, promotion, award of tenure, demotion, transfer, layoff, termination, right of return from layoff, and rehiring;
( 3 ) Rates of pay or any other form of compensation and changes in compensation;
( 4 ) Job assignments, job classifications, organizational structures, position descriptions, lines of progression, and seniority lists;
( 5 ) Leaves of absence, sick leave, or any other leave;
( 6 ) Fringe benefits available by virtue of employment, whether or not administered by the recipient;
( 7 ) Selection and financial support for training, including apprenticeship, professional meetings, conferences, and other related activities, and selection for leaves of absence to pursue training;
( 8 ) Employer sponsored activities, including social or recreational programs; and
( 9 ) Any other term, condition, or privilege of employment.
( d ) A recipient may not participate in a contractual or other relationship that has the effect of subjecting qualified handicapped applicants or employees to discrimination prohibited by this subpart. The relationships referred to in this paragraph include relationships with employment and referral agencies, with labor unions, with organizations providing or administering fringe benefits to employees of the recipient, and with organizations providing training and apprenticeship programs.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

May 20, 2021

In the Matter of

Clic Technology, Inc.,

File No. 500-1

ORDER OF SUSPENSION OF

TRADING

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Clic Technology, Inc.

(“CLCI1”) (CIK No. 1658304), a Nevada corporation located in Aventura, Florida with a class of 

securities registered with the Commission pursuant to Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

("Exchange Act") Section 12(g) because it is delinquent in its periodic filings with the 

Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-Q for the period 

ended June 30, 2019. On January 19, 2021, the Commission’s Division of Corporation Finance 

(“Corporation Finance”) sent a delinquency letter to CLCI requesting compliance with its 

periodic filing requirements, which was delivered. As of April 13, 2021, the common stock of 

CLCI was quoted on OTC Link operated by OTC Markets Group Inc. (formerly “Pink Sheets”) 

(“OTC Link”), had five market makers, and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of 

Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11(f)(3). 

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors 

require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company. Therefore, it is 

ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the 

 

1 The short form of each issuer’s name is also its stock symbol.
2

securities of the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on May 

21, 2021, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on June 4, 2021.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary
§ 17.16 Violations of classified information requirements. ( a ) Any person who suspects or has knowledge of a violation of this part, including the known or suspected loss or compromise of national security information, shall promptly report and confirm in writing the circumstances to the Department Security Officer. Any person who makes such a report to the Department Security Officer shall promptly furnish a copy of such report: ( 1 ) If the suspected violation involves a Department attorney (including an Assistant United States Attorney or Special Assistant United States Attorney) while engaged in litigation, grand jury proceedings, or giving legal advice, or a law enforcement officer assisting an attorney engaged in such activity, to the Office of Professional Responsibility;
( 2 ) If the suspected violation involves an employee of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) or the Drug Enforcement Administration, other than a law enforcement officer in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, to the Office of Professional Responsibility in that component; or
( 3 ) In any other circumstance, to the Office of the Inspector General.
( b ) Department employees, contractors, grantees, or consultants may be reprimanded, suspended without pay, terminated from classification authority, suspended from or denied access to classified information, or subject to other sanctions in accordance with applicable law and Department regulation if they: ( 1 ) Knowingly, willfully, or negligently disclose to unauthorized persons information classified under Executive Order 12958 or predecessor orders;
( 2 ) Knowingly, willfully, or negligently classify or continue the classification of information in violation of Executive Order 12958 or its implementing directives; or
( 3 ) Knowingly, willfully, or negligently violate any other provision of Executive Order 12958, or knowingly and wilfully grant eligibility for, or allow access to, classified information in violation of Executive Order 12968, or its implementing directives, this part, or security requirements promulgated by the Department Security Officer.
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 4 

Providing for a correction in the enrollment of H.J. Res. 31. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2019 

Mr. SHELBY submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for a correction in the enrollment of H.J. Res. 

31. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of the joint resolution 

3 H.J. Res. 31, the Clerk of the House of Representatives 

4 shall amend the long title so as to read: ‘‘Making consoli5 dated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 

6 30, 2019, and for other purposes.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS