alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §396b. Establishment; boundaries; administration

Effective July 1, 1961, the detached portion of the Hawaii National Park which lies on the island of Maui is established as a separate unit of the national park system to be known as Haleakalā National Park. The park so established shall be administered in accordance with the Act entitled "An Act to establish a National Park Service, and for other purposes", approved August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535),1 as amended and supplemented, and in accordance with any other applicable provision of law relating to the Maui portion of Hawaii National Park.

(Pub. L. 86–744, §1, Sept. 13, 1960, 74 Stat. 881; Pub. L. 106–510, §3(b)(1), Nov. 13, 2000, 114 Stat. 2363.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Act entitled "An Act to establish a National Park Service, and for other purposes", approved August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535), referred to in text, is act Aug. 25, 1916, ch. 408, 39 Stat. 535, known as the National Park Service Organic Act, which enacted sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 of this title and provisions set out as a note under section 100101 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs. Sections 1 to 4 of the Act were repealed and restated as section 1865(a) of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and section 100101(a), chapter 1003, and sections 100751(a), 100752, 100753, and 102101 of Title 54 by Pub. L. 113–287, §§3, 4(a)(1), 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3094, 3260, 3272. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables. For disposition of former sections of this title, see Disposition Table preceding section 100101 of Title 54.

#### Amendments

2000—Pub. L. 106–510 substituted "Haleakalā National Park" for "Haleakala National Park".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Pub. L. 106–510, §3(b)(2), Nov. 13, 2000, 114 Stat. 2363, provided that: "Any reference in any law (other than this Act [see Short Title of 2000 Amendments note set out under section 1 of this title]), regulation, document, record, map, or other paper of the United States to 'Haleakala National Park' shall be considered a reference to 'Haleakalā National Park'."

#### Hawai‘i Volcanoes National Park

Designation of portion of Hawaii National Park situated on island of Hawaii as Hawai‘i Volcanoes National Park, effective Sept. 22, 1961 see section 391d of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 97-11112 Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROBERT WILLIAM JOHNS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:97-CR-58-1

_________________________________________________________________ July 17, 1998 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Robert William Johns appeals his sentence from his guilty plea

conviction for possessi on with the intent to distribute

amphetamine.

Johns argues that the district court erred in its drug

quantity determina tion because the government did not prove that

certain drug s identified as methamphetamine were in fact

methamphetamine. Johns limited his objection at sentencing to the

reliability of the information provided by the confidential2

informants (“CIs”). Thus, review is limited to plain error.

Because Johns admitted to conspiring to possess with the intent to

distribute methamphetamine as well as amphetamine and because the

party objecting to information in the presentence report (“PSR”)

has the burden to demonstrate the unrel iability or inaccuracy of

that information, we detect no plain error. See United States v.

Calverley , 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc).

Johns argues that the district court erred in its drug

quantity determination because the information supplied by the CIs

as described in the PSR lacked corroboration to be reliable

information for use at sentencing. The investigation by law

enforcement officers, as described in the PSR, corroborated details

of Johns’s traffickin g activities. Johns failed to present any

evidence to rebut, or to demonstrate inaccuracy in, the PSR. The

district court did not err in relying on the PSR and, thus, the

determination of the amount of drugs for which Johns was held

accountable is not clearly erroneous. S ee United States v. Kelley

,

140 F.3d 596, 609-10 (5th Cir. 1998); U nited States v. Rogers
, 1

F.3d 341, 343-44 (5th Cir. 1993).

A F F I R M E D.
MCRP 5-12C

US Marine Corps

PCN 144 000056 00

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Marine Corps Supplement to the

Department of Defense Dictionary

of Military and Associated Terms
EXHIBIT 10.09

                            UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

$40,000                                                     Miami Beach, Florida
                                                                April 28th, 1999

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned promises to pay to the order of YUPI
INTERNET INC. and/or assigns, the principal sum of Forty Thousand dollars
($40,000) together with interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum,
until maturity, said payment to be in one lump sum of principal and interest for
Forty three thousand two hundred dollars ($43,200), lawful money of the United
States of America is due on April 27th, 2001.

This note shall be prepayable in whole or in part at any time without penalty.
This note may not be assumed without the consent of YUPI INTERNET INC.

Each maker and endorser severally waives demand, protest and notice of maturity,
non-payment or protest and all requirements necessary to hold each of them
liable as makers and endorsers.

Each maker and endorser further agrees, jointly and severally, to pay all costs
of collection, including a reasonable attorney's fee in case the principal of
this note and the interest thereon is not paid at the maturity date, or in case
it becomes necessary to protect the security thereof, whether suit be brought or
not.

/S/  CARLOS CARDONA
-------------------------
By Carlos Cardona
#### § 55.11 General.

The requirements of section 4(f)(4) or section 203(c) apply with respect to the languages of language minority groups. The applicable groups are indicated in the determinations of the Attorney General or the Director of the Census. This subpart relates to the view of the Attorney General concerning the determination by covered jurisdictions of precisely the language to be employed. In enforcing the Act, the Attorney General will consider whether the languages, forms of languages, or dialects chosen by covered jurisdictions for use in the electoral process enable members of applicable language minority groups to participate effectively in the electoral process. It is the responsibility of covered jurisdictions to determine what languages, forms of languages, or dialects will be effective. For those jurisdictions covered under section 203(c), the coverage determination (indicated in the appendix) may specify the particular language minority group (in parentheses) for which the jurisdiction is covered, but does not specify the language or dialect to be used for such group.

[Order No. 655-76, 41 FR 29998, July 20, 1976, as amended by Order No. 1246-87, 53 FR 736, Jan. 12, 1988; Order No. 3291-2011, 76 FR 54112, Aug. 31, 2011]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                         585,060
<SECURITIES>                                   250,620
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,809
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               859,489
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 859,489
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,053
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           849
<OTHER-SE>                                     827,587
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   859,489
<SALES>                                        295,679
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               295,679
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   81,760
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               251,709
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,377
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                460,657
<INCOME-TAX>                                    26,862
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            433,795
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   433,795
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .51


</TABLE>
#### § 1300.14 [Reserved]
### §448. Pioneer National Monument; establishment

When title to the sites of Fort Boonesborough, Boones Station, Bryans Station, and Blue Licks Battlefield, in the State of Kentucky, comprising noncontiguous tracts to be united by a Memorial Highway, together with such historical structures and remains thereon, as may be designated by the Secretary of the Interior as necessary or desirable for national-monument purposes and for the proper commemoration of the valor and sacrifices of the pioneers of "the West", shall have been vested in the United States, said areas and improvements shall be designated and set apart by proclamation of the President for preservation as a national monument for the benefit and inspiration of the people, and shall be called the "Pioneer National Monument."

(June 18, 1934, ch. 573, §1, 48 Stat. 982.)
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

Washington, D.C. 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 92962 / September 13, 2021

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension of trading 

in the securities of the following issuer, commencing at 9:30 a.m. EDT on September 14, 2021 

and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EDT on September 27, 2021:

 Bnet Media Group, Inc. (BNTT)

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of the foregoing company due 

to a lack of current and accurate information about the company because it has not filed certain 

periodic reports with the Commission. This order was entered pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act).

The Commission cautions brokers, dealers, shareholders and prospective purchasers that they 

should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available 

information and any information subsequently issued by this company.

Brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11, at 

the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered relating to the securities 

of the subject company unless and until the broker or dealer has strictly complied with all of the 

provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is required by the rule, it 

should refrain from entering quotations relating to the securities of this company that has been 

subject to a trading suspension until such time as it has familiarized itself with the rule and is 

certain that all of its provisions have been met. Any broker or dealer with questions regarding

the rule should contact the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, DC 

at (202) 551-5777. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation which is in violation of the rule,

the Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement action. 

If any broker, dealer or other person has any information which may relate to this matter, they 

should immediately communicate it to the Delinquent Filings Branch of the Division of 

Enforcement at (202) 551-5466, or by e-mail at DelinquentFilings@sec.gov.
proceeding."). Accordingly, we deny the petition and the motion for a stay. It is so ORDERED.
J. Hardesty Parraguirre Cherry
cc: Hon. Elissa F. Cadish, District Judge Clark County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

2 J.
§ 551.114 Medical, psychiatric and psychological. ( a ) Staff shall provide the pretrial inmate with the same level of basic medical (including dental), psychiatric, and psychological care provided to convicted inmates.
( b ) Staff shall advise the court, through the U.S. Marshal, of medication the pretrial inmate receives which may alter the inmate's courtroom behavior.
( c ) In event of serious illness or death of a pretrial inmate, staff shall notify the committing court, U.S. Marshal, U.S. Attorney's Office, the inmate's attorney of record, and the designated family member or next of kin.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.  No. 01-4371

EVARISTO PAZ-ZAMORA,

Defendant-Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham.

Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge.

(CR-00-406)

Submitted: October 4, 2001

Decided: October 16, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

COUNSEL

Louis C. Allen, III, Federal Public Defender, John A. Dusenbury, Jr.,

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina. Benjamin H. White, Jr., United States Attorney, Arnold L. Husser, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 

OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

Evaristo Paz-Zamora appeals the sentence imposed following his

guilty plea to unlawful re-entry after deportation by an alien who had

previously been convicted of an aggravated felony in violation of 8

U.S.C.A. §§ 1326(a), (b)(1)(West 1999). Paz-Zamora’s attorney has

filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967). Counsel states there are no meritorious issues for appeal, but

contends on Paz-Zamora’s behalf that the district court erred in sentencing Paz-Zamora to ninety months’ imprisonment, which was

within the guidelines range of seventy-seven to ninety-six months.

Paz-Zamora was informed of his right to file a pro se supplemental

brief but has not done so. 

As Paz-Zamora presents no challenge to the calculation of the

guidelines range but merely contends his sentence was too high

within the correct range, we find he is not entitled to appellate review

on his claim. See United States v. Jones, 18 F.3d 1145, 1150-51 (4th

Cir. 1994); United States v. Porter, 909 F.2d 789, 794 (4th Cir. 1990).

In addition, we have examined the entire record in this case in accordance with the requirements of Anders and find no meritorious issues

for appeal. We therefore affirm Paz-Zamora’s conviction and sentence. 

This court requires counsel to inform his client, in writing, of his

right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further

review. If the client requests a petition be filed, but counsel believes

such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this

court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion

must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. Finally, we

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2 UNITED STATES v. PAZ-ZAMORA
### §450oo–8. Advisory assistance for developments upon adjacent lands

To the extent that appropriated funds and personnel are available therefor, the Secretary of the Interior shall provide consultative or advisory assistance to the Minnesota Chippewa Tribe and the Grand Portage Band of Chippewa Indians, Minnesota, in the planning of facilities or developments upon the lands adjacent to the monument.

(Pub. L. 85–910, §9, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1753.)
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.33




October 3, 2000


Shawn K. McCoy
1309 N. Hudson Street
Arlington, Virginia  22201

Dear Shawn:

In consideration of your efforts for the company, HADRON, Inc. has agreed to
make an exception to the corporate policy regarding severance pay.  In the event
your employment is involuntarily terminated, other than for cause, HADRON, Inc.
agrees to pay you six (6) months' severance pay at your then current rate of
pay, but calculations will be based on not less than $140,000 per annum base
salary.  This agreement is effective October 3, 2000 and supercedes all other
agreements, both written and verbal.

To acknowledge this agreement, please sign and date in the area below and return
to Ellen Hyslope, Vice President, Administration.

Sincerely,



Jon M. Stout
President and Chief Executive Officer



_________________________                             _______________
Shawn K. McCoy                                        Date
Appellate Docket Number:

Appellate Case Style: Style:

-CP

State ofTexas

Companion Case:

Amended/correctedstatement: n

DOCKETING STATEMENT (Criminal)

Appellate Court:

TV

%

ro

<=D

rn

m

-o

ro

cn

5*"

:x

jr.:

-1 •

1—1,

21'

(to be filed in the court of appeals upon perfection of appeal under TRAP 32) ' ' cn

L Appellant

First Name: HoDERIC^

Middle Name:

Last Name:

Suffix:

Appellant Incarcerated? Yes Q No

Amount ofBond: v;

ProSe:

n. Appellant Attorney(s)

I I Lead Attorney

First Name:

Middle Name:

Last Name:

Suffix:

[~| Appointed

n Retained

Firm Name:

Address 1:

Address 2:

City:

State:

Telephone:

Fax:

Email:

SEN:

Page I of 5

• District/County Attorney

I I Public Defender

AddAnother Appellant/

$• Attorney
#### Esther FORBUSH v. R. S. AUDLEY INC.

Civ. A. No. 2698.

United States District Court D. New Hampshire.

Nov. 4, 1966.

James M. Winston, Manchester, N. H., for plaintiff.

Eaton, Eaton, Ross & Moody, Robert I. Eaton, Manchester, N. H., for defendant.

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND PLEADINGS

CONNOR, District Judge.

In the complaint, the plaintiff seeks under her first cause of action to recover from the defendant certain overtime pay and liquidated damages to which she is allegedly entitled by virtue of the overtime pay and penalty provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 207(a) (1) and § 216(b). Under a second cause of action, the plaintiff seeks to recover from the defendant damages incurred when the defendant allegedly violated the Equal Pay Act of 1963, 29 U.S.C.A. § 206(d) (1), and to recover any liquidated or other damages allowed by statute under these circumstances.

The plaintiff moves the Court to permit her to amend her pleadings by adding thereto a third cause of action in which she alleges that the defendant owes her a certain sum of money for vacation pay. Although amendments to pleadings are to be “freely given” when sought in good faith and when undue prejudice will not result to the other party, Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 83 S.Ct. 227, 9 L.Ed.2d 222 such amendments are not proper if they introduce into the suit causes of action over which the Federal District Court has no jurisdiction. The plaintiff initially brought this suit under certain federal statutes which provide her with two federal causes of' action. She cannot now, under the doctrine of pendent jurisdiction or under any other doctrine, amend her complaint to add a third non-federal cause of action in contract to recover vacation pay. The United States Supreme Court in Hurn v. Oursler, 289 U.S. 238, 245-246, 53 S.Ct. 586, 589, 77 L.Ed. 1148 stated: “But the rule *[i. e.*of pendent jurisdiction] does not go so far as to permit a federal court to assume jurisdiction of a separate and distinct non-federal cause of action because it is joined in the same complaint with a federal cause of action-The distinction to be observed is between, a case where two distinct grounds in. support of a single cause of action are-alleged, one only of which presents a federal question, and a case where two separate and distinct causes of action are • alleged, one only of which is federal in character. In the former, where the federal question averred is not plainly wanting in substance, the federal court, even *548though the federal ground be not established, may nevertheless retain and dispose of the case upon the non-federal *ground;*in the latter it may not do so upon the non-federal *cause of action.”*See also Strachman v. Palmer, 177 F.2d 427 (C.A. 1st Cir. 1949).

The plaintiff’s motion is denied.
Spirit.

Body.

Building stronger communities 

through health and wellness.

Health and wellness mean taking care of the whole person: mind, body, spirit. But due to busy schedules, 

we may put our own well-being last.

This year, we want to make it easier for you and your loved ones to put your well-being first, by making 

vaccination more convenient.

Flu can be a serious disease, even for healthy people. Everyone 6 months and older is recommended to 

get a yearly flu vaccine. 

Protect your family, congregation and yourself by getting the flu vaccine.

To learn 

more, visit 

www.cdc.gov/flu

Mind.

Clinic information/logo here

CS52420-B