alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §264. Administration, protection, and development

The administration, protection, and development of the aforesaid national historical park shall be exercised under the direction of the Secretary of the Interior by the National Park Service, subject to the provisions of the Act of August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535), entitled "An Act to establish a National Park Service, and for other purposes",1 as amended.

(June 11, 1940, ch. 304, §4, 54 Stat. 263.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Act of August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535), entitled "An Act to establish a National Park Service, and for other purposes", referred to in text, is act Aug. 25, 1916, ch. 408, 39 Stat. 535, known as the National Park Service Organic Act, which enacted sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 of this title and provisions set out as a note under section 100101 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs. Sections 1 to 4 of the Act were repealed and restated as section 1865(a) of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and section 100101(a), chapter 1003, and sections 100751(a), 100752, 100753, and 102101 of Title 54 by Pub. L. 113–287, §§3, 4(a)(1), 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3094, 3260, 3272. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables. For disposition of former sections of this title, see Disposition Table preceding section 100101 of Title 54.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

1 See References in Text note below.
Non-Internet Public 

 

 

 

 

 

FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 

STATEMENT FOR THE NORTHEAST (NE)-07 PROJECT 

Millennium Pipeline Company, LP 

Docket No. CP98-150-006, et al. 

Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation 

Docket No. CP05-19-000, et al. 

Appendix B1 

• USGS Location Maps 

Pages: B1-1 through B1-51 

• Aboveground Facility Plot Plans

Page: B1-52

Public access for the above information is available only 

through the Public Reference Room, or by e-mail at 

public.referenceroom@ferc.gov.
§ 548.19 Pastoral visits. If requested by an inmate, the chaplain shall facilitate arrangements for pastoral visits by a clergyperson or representative of the inmate's faith. ( a ) The chaplain may request an NCIC check and documentation of such clergyperson's or faith group representative's credentials.
( b ) Pastoral visits may not be counted as social visits. They will ordinarily take place in the visiting room during regular visiting hours.
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 8

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION III

No. CR-14-524

DERRICK A. WHITNEY

APPELLANT

V.

STATE OF ARKANSAS

APPELLEE

Opinion Delivered January 14, 2015

APPEAL FROM THE CRITTENDEN

COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

[NO. CR-2009-734]

HONORABLE RALPH WILSON, JR.,

JUDGE

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED

RITA W. GRUBER, Judge

In May 2010, Derrick A. Whitney pleaded guilty to selling or delivering cocaine and

received eight years’ probation, subject to written conditions. In September 2012, the State

alleged in a petition to revoke that Whitney violated conditions of probation that included

a requirement to pay fines and costs. At the conclusion of the revocation hearing, the circuit

court found that Whitney had made no payments and had inexcusably failed to comply with

the condition to pay fines and costs. The court revoked Whitney’s probation and sentenced

him to twenty-four months’ confinement in the Arkansas Department of Community

Correction1 and thirty-six months’ suspended imposition of sentence. 

Pursuant to Rule 4-3(k)(1) of the Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of

Appeals (2014), Whitney’s counsel has filed a no-merit brief and a motion to withdraw on

1Counsel incorrectly states in his brief that Whitney was to serve twenty-four months

in the Arkansas Department of Correction. 
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 8

the ground that an appeal in this matter would be wholly without merit. Whitney was

notified of his right to file pro se points for reversal and has done so; the State has responded

to those points. 

Counsel informs us that the revocation itself was the only ruling adverse to Whitney. 

The argument section of counsel’s no-merit brief fairly summarizes testimony by the collector

of fines, documentary evidence, and testimony by Whitney regarding his failure to pay fines

and costs. The State correctly argues in its brief that Whitney’s points, which essentially ask

that he be allowed to return home to look after his elderly mother, amount to a plea for

clemency that must be addressed to the executive branch rather than to this court. E.g.,

Parker v. State, 302 Ark. 509, 512, 790 S.W.2d 894, 895 (1990); Nguyen v. State, 2010 Ark.

App. 25, at 2. 

From our review of the record and the briefs presented to us, we find compliance with

Rule 4-3(k)(1), and we hold that there is no merit to this appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s

motion to withdraw is granted and the order of revocation is affirmed. 

Affirmed; motion granted. 

GLOVER and WHITEAKER, JJ., agree.

C. Brian Williams, for appellant.

Dustin McDaniel, Att’y Gen., by: Jake H. Jones, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.

2
proceeding."). Accordingly, we deny the petition and the motion for a stay. 

It is so ORDERED. 

J. 

Hardesty 

Parraguirre 

Cherry 

cc: Hon. Elissa F. Cadish, District Judge 

Clark County Public Defender 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

2 

J.
§ 1270.9 States' responsibilities regarding compliance. ( a ) States are responsible for ensuring compliance with 23 U.S.C. 154 and this part.
( b ) A State that has been determined to be in compliance with the requirements of 23 U.S.C. 154 and this part must promptly notify the appropriate NHTSA Regional Administrator in writing of any change or change in enforcement of the State's open container law, identifying the specific change(s).
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Analex Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), we, Sterling E. Phillips, Jr. and Ronald B. Alexander, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                              
|/S/ Sterling E. Phillips, Jr.                                                 
|Sterling E. Phillips, Jr. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  March 29, 2004

|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|                                                           
|/S/ Ronald B. Alexander                                    
|Ronald B. Alexander Chief Financial Officer  March 29, 2004







1
Bike and Ride. Put your bike on the bus, and ride the seashore bike trails, and the Cape Cod Rail trail. Unless otherwise indicated, public

bus service, with bike racks, is available year round at the parking areas designated with a .

BIKE SAFETY STARTS WITH HELMETS. All riders, regardless of age, are urged to wear protective

headgear. Massachusetts state law requires children 16 and younger to wear protective helmets when

operating or riding as a passenger on a bicycle.

Check your brakes, gears, and steering before entering a trail, especially if you have an unfamiliar bike.

Ride single file and stay to the right. All trails have two-way traffic and heavy traffic times.

DON’T SPEED.  Use front and rear brakes together.

Be alert for the unexpected, especially pedestrians, rollerbladers, hikers, dogs, and windblown sand.

Steep hills, sharp turns, and low tunnels exist.  Low areas may flood.

Loose sand and other debris may cover trails creating periodic hazardous conditions.

Riders are requested to walk bikes through tunnels.

Private property exists within the seashore. Please respect owners’ rights.

Areas of

caution

Bike trails, safety tips, and guidelines

Cape Cod National Park Service

U.S. Department of the Interior

Cape Cod National Seashore

Coast Guard

Beach

N

Legend: Bike Trail



















.

Parking

(seasonal)

Restrooms Picnic area

Nauset Trail Access points: Salt Pond Visitor Center parking area, Eastham

Distance: 1.6 miles Doane Rock picnic area, Eastham

1 0 1 Mile

Use extreme

caution!
(legend on reverse side)

Head of the Meadow Trail Access points: High Head Road, Truro

Distance: 2 miles Head of the Meadow Beach parking area, Truro (beach fees may apply)

EXP E R I E N C E Y O U R A M E R I CA

no bus service

at this location



(legend on reverse side)

Province Lands Trail

Distance in miles:

Loop trail 5.45

Herring Cove Beach spur 1.10

Race Point Beach spur .50

Bennett Pond spur .25

Access points:

Beech Forest parking area

Province Lands Visitor Center

Race Point Beach parking area*

Herring Cove Beach parking area*

* beach fees may apply

WARNING:

This bicycle trail

contains steep hills,

sharp curves,

low tunnels, and may

have windblown

sand, among other

hazards. Some areas

may be seasonally

submerged. Numerous accidents and

serious injuries have

occurred due to

excessive speed,

failure to pay

attention, and lack of

adult supervision.

CAUTION:

! Speed limit is 10 mph.

! Yield to pedestrians and

 horses.

! Ride single file.

! Stay to the RIGHT,

 except when passing.

! Helmets required for

 ages 16 and under,

 STRONGLY urged for all.

! Walk bikes through

 tunnels.

1 0 1 Mile

1 0 1 Mile

Watch for

these signs.

AREAS OF

CAUTION!

If you experience

or encounter a

serious accident,

dial 911.

no bus service

at this location



no bus service

at this location


```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 351 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 351

   Designating the week of September 29 through October 5, 2019, as 
                 ``National Community Policing Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 26, 2019

 Mrs. Shaheen (for herself, Mr. Cornyn, and Ms. Hassan) submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Designating the week of September 29 through October 5, 2019, as 
                 ``National Community Policing Week''.

Whereas police officers are indispensable members of the community who put their 
        lives on the line to protect others;
Whereas promoting strong relationships founded in trust and mutual respect 
        between law enforcement officers and the communities they serve helps 
        ensure the safe and effective execution of the law;
Whereas law enforcement officers and communities that work together to address 
        public safety concerns can create lasting solutions to difficult 
        challenges;
Whereas a long-term commitment to community policing is necessary to eliminate 
        the underlying causes of crime;
Whereas the advancement of community policing should be supported to ensure that 
        State and local law enforcement agencies have necessary resources; and
Whereas community policing has been recognized as an important tool for 
        improving the relationship between law enforcement officers and the 
        communities they serve: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the week of September 29 through October 5, 
        2019, as ``National Community Policing Week''; and
            (2) supports community policing and encourages the people 
        of the United States, law enforcement agencies, and elected 
        officials to identify ways in which communities can improve 
        public safety, strengthen relationships, and build trust.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 55.9 Coverage of political units within a county.

Where a political subdivision (e.g., a county) is determined to be subject to section 4(f)(4) or section 203(c), all political units that hold elections within that political subdivision (e.g., cities, school districts) are subject to the same requirements as the political subdivision.
§ 71.22 Exchange of witness lists, statements, and exhibits. ( a ) At least 15 days before the hearing or at such other time as may be ordered by the ALJ, the parties shall exchange witness lists, copies of prior statements of proposed witnesses, and copies of proposed hearing exhibits, including copies of any written statements that the party intends to offer in lieu of live testimony in accordance with § 71.33(b). At the time the above documents are exchanged, any party that intends to rely on the transcript of deposition testimony in lieu of live testimony at the hearing, if permitted by the ALJ, shall provide each party with a copy of the specific pages of the transcript it intends to introduce into evidence.
( b ) If a party objects, the ALJ may not admit into evidence the testimony of any witness whose name does not appear on the witness list or any exhibit not provided to the opposing party as provided above unless the ALJ finds good cause for the failure or that there is no prejudice to the objecting party.
( c ) Unless another party objects within the time set by the ALJ, documents exchanged in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section shall be deemed to be authentic for the purpose of admissibility at the hearing.
### §459e. Fire Island National Seashore

#### (a) Purposes; authorization for establishment

For the purpose of conserving and preserving for the use of future generations certain relatively unspoiled and undeveloped beaches, dunes, and other natural features within Suffolk County, New York, which possess high values to the Nation as examples of unspoiled areas of great natural beauty in close proximity to large concentrations of urban population, the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to establish an area to be known as the "Fire Island National Seashore".

#### (b) Boundaries

The boundaries of the national seashore shall extend from the easterly boundary of the main unit of Robert Moses State Park eastward to Moriches Inlet and shall include not only Fire Island proper, but also such islands and marshlands in the Great South Bay, Bellport Bay, and Moriches Bay adjacent to Fire Island as Sexton Island, West Island, Hollins Island, Ridge Island, Pelican Island, Pattersquash Island, and Reeves Island and such other small and adjacent islands, marshlands, and wetlands as would lend themselves to contiguity and reasonable administration within the national seashore and, in addition, the waters surrounding said area to distances of one thousand feet in the Atlantic Ocean and up to four thousand feet in Great South Bay and Moriches Bay and, in addition, mainland terminal and headquarters sites, not to exceed a total of twelve acres, on the Patchogue River within Suffolk County, New York, all as delineated on a map identified as "Fire Island National Seashore", numbered OGP–0004, dated May 1978. The Secretary shall publish said map in the Federal Register, and it may also be examined in the offices of the Department of the Interior.

(Pub. L. 88–587, §1, Sept. 11, 1964, 78 Stat. 928; Pub. L. 95–625, title III, §322(a), Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3488.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1978—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 95–625 inserted "the main unit of" before "Robert Moses State Park", included in the boundaries the mainland terminal and headquarters sites, not to exceed a total of twelve acres, on the Patchogue River within Suffolk County, New York, and substituted map numbered OGP—0004, dated May 1978 for OGP—0002, dated June 1964 and requirement of publishing the map in the Federal Register for prior provision for filing the map with the Federal Register.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title of 1984 Amendment

Pub. L. 98–482, §1, Oct. 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 2255, provided: "That this Act [amending sections 459e–1 and 459e–2 of this title] may be cited as the 'Fire Island National Seashore Amendments Act of 1984'."
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 JULY 30, 2010

JOHN LEY

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 09-15316

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 07-01233-CV-T-26-EAJ

JOHNATHAN MARK RUIZ, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus

TOWN OF INDIAN SHORES, FLORIDA, 

a Florida municipality, et al., 

Defendants, 

JOHN P. WISEMAN,

Officer, in his individual capacity,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(July 30, 2010)
Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Defendant/Appellant Police Officer John P. Wiseman brings this

interlocutory appeal from the district court’s order denying his motion for

summary judgment based upon qualified immunity. Plaintiff/Appellee Jon Mark

Ruiz sued Wiseman, among others, claiming that Wiseman violated Ruiz’s Fourth

Amendment rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by falsely arresting him and by using

excessive force during the arrest.

After reviewing the record and reading the parties’ briefs, we conclude that

the district court erred in not granting Wiseman qualified immunity on the false

arrest claim but properly denied Wiseman qualified immunity on the excessive

force claim. 

The record clearly demonstrates that, at the very least, Wiseman had

arguable probable cause to arrest Ruiz for a violation of the Town of Indian

Shores’ public consumption ordinance. The Supreme Court has held that “[i]f an

officer has probable cause to believe that an individual has committed even a very

minor criminal offense in his presence, he may, without violating the Fourth

Amendment, arrest the offender.” Atwater v. City of Lago Vista, 532 U.S. 318,

2
354, 121 S. Ct. 1536, 1557 (2001). That is the situation we have here and the

district court erred in not granting qualified immunity to Wiseman on this claim.

Concerning the excessive force claim, we agree with the district court that

the Graham factors supported Ruiz. The present case is on “all-fours” with our 1

recent decision in Brown v. City of Huntsville, Alabama, 608 F.3d 724 (11th Cir.

2010), where we reversed the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor

of a law enforcement officer on an excessive force claim because his actions

arguably constituted excessive force. 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s denial of qualified immunity to

Wiseman on the excessive force claim.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 395, 109 S. Ct. 1865, 1872 (1989). 1

3
(66 South. 550)

No. 18211.

#### STATE v. CARONDELET CANAL & NAVIGATION CO.

(Nov. 30, 1914.)

On motion for filing of mandate of the United States Supreme Court (233 U. S. 362, 34 Sup. Ct. 627, 58 L. Ed. 1001) reversing a former judgment of this court (120 La. 279, 56 South. 137) and remanding the cause.

Mandate filed and made executory, and judgment of district court affirmed.

Farrar, Jonas, Goldsborough & Goldberg, Benjamin T. Waldo, and Dufour & Dufour, all of New Orleans, for appellant. B. G. Pleasant, Atty. Gen., for the State.

PEB CUBIAM.

On motion of Farrar, Jonas, Goldsborough & Goldberg, Benjamin T. Waldo, and Dufour *&*Dufour, counsel for the liquidators of the Carondelet Canal & Navigation Company, defendants herein, and on filing herewith the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States, reversing the judgment in this cause entered by this court, and remanding this cause to this court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States.

It is ordered by the court that said mandate be filed and made executory in this court.

It is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed in this cause that the final decree herein rendered in favor of the state of Louisiana and against the defendants be set aside and annulled.

And it is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the civil district court rendered in this cause be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

O’NIELL, J., takes no part.

Note. — This case is to be found reported in 129 La. at page 279, 56 South. 137. It was *95transferred to the Supreme Court of the United States upon a writ of error. 233 U. S. 362, 34 Sup. Ct. 627, 58 L. Ed. 1001.
### Geology, ore deposits, and exploratory drilling in the Deer Flat area, White Canyon district, San Juan County, Utah

By: Tommy L. FinnellPaul C. FranksHarold A. Hubbard

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1132

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **5**                            (1709 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.