alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Notice of 

GRANT AVIATION, INC. Docket DOT~OST~ 

Intent to terminate service at Perryville, Alaska 

Pursuant to 49 USC 41734 

90·0ay Notice of Termination of Service 

Correspondence with regard to this document should be addressed to: 

R. Bruce McGlasson 

CEO 

Grant Aviation, Inc 

P.O. Box 92200 

Anchorage,AK 99509 

907 529-6999 

bmcglasson@flygrant.com 

May 30,2015 
Notice of 

GRANT AVIATION, INC. 

Intent to terminate service at Perryville, Alaska 

Pursuant to 49 USC 41734 

Docket DOT·OST· 

90 Day Notice ofTermlnatlon of Service 

Pursuant to. 49 usc 41734, Grant Aviation, Inc. hereby gives notice of its intent to terminate scheduled service to Perryville, 

Alaska, effective August 28, 2015. 

In accordance with Section 41734, Grant Aviation, Inc. supplies the following information: 

1. Identification of Carrier 

Grant Aviation, Inc 

P.O. Box 92200 

Anchorage, AK 99509 

Communications with respect to this document should be directed to: 

R. Bruce McGlasson 

CEO 

Grant Aviation, Inc 

P.O. Box 92200 

Anchorage, AK 99509 

907 529-6999 

bmcglasson@flygrant.com 

2. At the time of this notice Grant Aviation provides scheduled service to Perryville, Alaska. 

3. Grant Aviation's service to Perryville consists of 6 flights weekly 

4. Grant Aviation, Inc provides the only scheduled air service to Perryville, Alaska, transporting passengers, cargo, and 

U.S. Mail to this isolated community. 

5. The effective date of this notice is May 30, 2015. Grant Aviation is hereby providing public notice of its intent to 

terminate scheduled air service to Perryville, Alaska on August 28, 2015, providing 90 days notice as required. Any 

objections to this Notice to Terminate Service must be filed within 20 days from the date of this filing. 

1?.~fi·~ R. Bruce McGlasson 

CEO 

Grant Aviation, Inc 

P .0. Box 92200 

Anchorage AK 99509-2200 
Certificate of Service 

I hereby certify that r have caused a copy of the foregoing Notice of Termination to be served on May 30, 2015 to each of 

the persons named below. 

Kevin Schlemmer 

Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis Division 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

kevin.schlemmer@dot.gov 

Rich Sewell 

Aviation Policy Planner 

Division of Statewide Aviation 

Alaska DOT /PF 

rich.sewell@alaska.gov 

Gerald Kosbruk, President 

Native Village of Perryville 

P.O. Box 89 

Perryville, AK 99648 

nvproads@ hotmail.com 

Kate Conley, Borough Clerk 

P.O. Box 495 

King Salmon, AK 99613 

kateconley@lakeandpen.com
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF

SECURITIES

1. Name and Address of Reporting Person* (Last) (First) (Middle)

(Street)

(City) (State) (Zip)

Table I — Non-Derivative Securities Acquired, Disposed of, o

FORM 5

Check this box if no longersubject to Section 16. Form 4 or Form 5 obligations may continue. 

 See Instruction 1(b).

Form 3 Holdings ReportedForm 4 Transaction Reported 

(Print or Type Responses)

4. If Amendment, Date Original Filed(Month/Day/Year)

5. Relationship 

 Direct

O

ffi ce

title be

6. Individual or 

__

Form fi led 

__

Form fi led 

1. Title of Security

(Instr. 3)

2. Transaction

Date

 (Month/ Day/ Year)

3. Transaction Code

(Instr. 8)

4. Securities Acquired (A)

or Disposed of (D)(Instr. 3, 4 and 5)

(A) or

 Amount (D) Price

5. Amou

SecuriBene

fi 

Owned end of Fiscal (Instr. 

Potential persons who are to respond to the collection of inforin this form are not required to respond unless the form displayOMB control number.

Reminder: Report on a separate line for each class of securities bene

fi cially owned directly or indirectly.

* If the form is 

fi led by more than one reporting person, see Instruction 4(b)(v).

2. Issuer Name and Ticker or Trading Symbol

3. Statement for Issuer'sFiscal Year Ended(Month/Day/Year)

2A. Deemed

Execution Date, if any

 (Month/ Day/Year)

Check this box to indicate that a transaction was made pursuant to a contract, instruction or written plan that is intended to satisfy the a

ffi rmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c). 

See Instruction 10.

Filed pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Securities ExchangPublic Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 or Section 31940 
FORM 5 (continued) Table II — Derivative Securities Acquired, Disposed of, or Benefi cially Owned 

( e.g., puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)

1. Title of Derivative

 Security(Instr. 3)

2. Conver- sion or Exercise Price of Deri- vative Security

3. Trans- action Date(Month/Day/Year)

4. Trans-  action Code (Instr. 8)

6. Date Exer- cisable and Expiration Date (Month/Day/ Year)Date ExpiraExer- tioncisable Date

5. Number of Derivative Securities

Acquired (A) orDisposed of (D)(Instr. 3, 4, and 5)

(A) (D) 

8. Price

ofDeriv

 ative  Secu ity (Instr 5)

7. Title and Amount of Underlying Securities

(Instr. 3 and 4)

 Amount or

 Title Number of

 Shares

Explanation of Responses:** Intentional misstatements or omissions of facts constitute Federal Criminal Violations. **Signature of Reporting Person 

 See 18 U.S.C. 1001 and 15 U.S.C. 78ff (a).Note: File three copies of this Form, one of which must be manually signed. If space is insuffi cient,

see Instruction 6 for procedure.

Potential persons who are to respond to the collection of information contained in this form are notrequired to respond unless the form displays a currently valid OMB Number.

3A. Deemed Execution Date, if  any(Month/Day/Year)
#### § 544.30 Purpose and scope.

The Bureau of Prisons encourages inmates to make constructive use of leisure time and offers movies, games, sports, social activities, arts and hobbycrafts, wellness and other group and individual activities.
### SUBCHAPTER III—STATE AND FEDERAL WETLANDS ACQUISITION
§ 814.4 Exception to entitlement to notice, hearing, written responses, and final decisions. For internal collections, the provisions of § 814.3 do not apply to: ( a ) Any adjustment to pay arising out of an employee's election of coverage or a change in coverage under a Federal benefits program requiring periodic deductions from pay, if the amount to be recovered was accumulated over four pay periods or less;
( b ) A routine intra-agency adjustment of pay that is made to correct an overpayment of pay attributable to clerical or administrative errors or delays in processing pay documents, if the overpayment occurred within the four pay periods preceding the adjustment and, at the time of such adjustment, or as soon thereafter as practical, the individual is provided written notice of the nature and the amount of the adjustment and point of contact for contesting such adjustment; or
( c ) Any adjustment to collect a debt amounting to $50 or less, if, at the time of such adjustment, or as soon thereafter as practical, the individual is provided written notice of the nature and the amount of the adjustment and a point of contact for contesting such adjustment.
§ 1340.9 Computation of estimates. ( a ) *Data used.* Except as otherwise provided in this section, all data collected pursuant to § 1340.7(e) shall be used, without exclusion, in the computation of the Statewide seat belt use rate, standard error, and nonresponse rate.
( b ) *Data editing.* Known values of data contributing to the Statewide seat belt use rate shall not be altered in any manner.
( c ) *Imputation.* Unknown values of variables shall not be imputed unless NHTSA has approved the State's imputation procedure prior to data analysis.
( d ) *Sampling weights.* The estimation formula shall weight observed data by the sampling weights as required by the sample design and any subsequent adjustments.
( e ) *Sampling weight adjustments for observation sites with no usable data.* States shall include a procedure to adjust the sampling weights for observation sites with no usable data, including observation sites where no data were collected and observation sites where data were discovered to be falsified.
( f ) *Nonresponse rate.* ( 1 ) Subject to paragraph (f)(2) of this section, the nonresponse rate for the entire survey shall not exceed 10 percent for the ratio of the total number of recorded unknown values of belt use to the total number of drivers and passengers observed.
( 2 ) The State shall include a procedure for collecting additional observations in the same calendar year of the survey to reduce the nonresponse rate to no more than 10 percent if the nonresponse rate in paragraph (f)(1) of this section exceeds 10 percent.
( g ) *Variance estimation.* ( 1 ) Subject to paragraph (g)(2) of this section, the estimated standard error, using the variance estimation method in the survey design, shall not exceed 2.5 percentage points.
( 2 ) If the standard error exceeds this threshold, additional observations shall be conducted in the same calendar year of the survey until the standard error does not exceed 2.5 percentage points.
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________
No. 23

- 13059
Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________
DAVID SAULSBERRY,
Plaintiff

- Appellant,

versus BRITNEY ELDER, a.k.a. FTN Bae,

Defendant

- Appellee.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 0:21

- cv

- 62362

- RS USCA11 Case: 23-13059 Document: 16-1 Date Filed: 11/29/2023 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 23

- 13059

____________________ Before W ILSON , G RANT , and A BUDU , Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte , for lack of jurisdiction. David Saulsberry appeals from the district court’s August 15, 2023 paperless order striking his motion for summary judgment. The court previously vacated a jur y verdict and final judgment in favor of Saulsberry and has set a new trial for December 4, 2023

. We lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the August 15 order is not final or otherwise appealable. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; CSX Transp., Inc. v. City of Garden City , 235 F.3d 1325, 1327 (11th Cir. 2000)

. The order is not final because Saulsberry’s claims, and the defendant’s counterclaims, have not yet been resolved. See Supreme Fuels Trading FZE v. Sargeant , 689 F.3d 1244, 1245

- 46 (11th Cir. 2012). Fur thermore, the order is not otherwise appealable underthe collateral order doctrine because it would not be effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment. See Plaintiff A v. Schair
, 744 F.3d 1247, 1252

- 53 (11th Cir. 2014). No petition for reh earing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40

- 3 and all other applicable rules. USCA11 Case: 23-13059 Document: 16-1 Date Filed: 11/29/2023 Page: 2 of 2
§ 1200.13 Special funding conditions for Section 402 grants. The State's highway safety program under Section 402 shall be subject to the following conditions, and approval under § 1200.14 of this part shall be deemed to incorporate these conditions: ( a ) *Planning and administration costs.* ( 1 ) Federal participation in P&A activities shall not exceed 50 percent of the total cost of such activities, or the applicable sliding scale rate in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 120. The Federal contribution for P&A activities shall not exceed 13 percent of the total funds the State receives under 23 U.S.C. 402. In accordance with 23 U.S.C. 120(i), the Federal share payable for projects in the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands shall be 100 percent. The Indian Country, as defined by 23 U.S.C. 402(h), is exempt from the provisions of P&A requirements. NHTSA funds shall be used only to finance P&A activities attributable to NHTSA programs. Determinations of P&A shall be in accordance with the provisions of Appendix F.
( 2 ) P&A tasks and related costs shall be described in the P&A module of the State's Highway Safety Plan. The State's matching share shall be determined on the basis of the total P&A costs in the module.
( b ) *Automated traffic enforcement systems prohibition.* The State may not expend funds apportioned to the State under 23 U.S.C. 402 to carry out a program to purchase, operate, or maintain an automated traffic enforcement system. The term “automated traffic enforcement system” includes any camera which captures an image of a vehicle for the purposes only of red light and speed enforcement, and does not include hand held radar and other devices operated by law enforcement officers to make an on-the-scene traffic stop, issue a traffic citation, or other enforcement action at the time of the violation.
#### § 300.2 Informal conference.

The Administrator or a designee may confer with Commission staff prior to submitting an application under subpart B, with respect to the appropriate form and content of such application.
1,000,000,000,000

germs can live in 

after using the toilet

WASH YOUR HANDS

one gram of poop 

(That’s the weight of a paper clip!)
§ 8.19 Petition for expedited release in an administrative forfeiture proceeding. ( a ) Where property is seized for administrative forfeiture involving controlled substances in personal use quantities the owner may petition the seizing agency for expedited release of the property.
( b ) Where property described in § 8.19(a) is a commercial fishing industry vessel proceeding to or from a fishing area or intermediate port of call or actually engaged in fishing operations, which would be subject to seizure for administrative forfeiture for a violation of law involving controlled substances in personal use quantities, a summons to appear shall be issued in lieu of a physical seizure. The vessel shall report to the port designated in the summons. The seizing agency shall be authorized to effect administrative forfeiture as if the vessel had been physically seized. Upon answering the summons to appear on or prior to the last reporting date specified in the summons, the owner of the vessel may file a petition for expedited release pursuant to § 8.19(a), and the provisions of § 8.19(a) and other provisions in this section pertaining to a petition for expedited release shall apply as if the vessel had been physically seized.
( c ) The owner filing the petition for expedited release shall establish the following: ( 1 ) The owner has a valid, good faith interest in the seized property as owner or otherwise;
( 2 ) The owner reasonably attempted to ascertain the use of the property in a normal and customary manner; and
( 3 ) The owner did not know of or consent to the illegal use of the property, or in the event that the owner knew or should have known of the illegal use, the owner did what reasonably could be expected to prevent the violation.
( d ) In addition to those factors listed in § 8.19(c), if an owner can demonstrate that the owner has other statutory rights or defenses that would cause the owner to prevail on the issue of forfeiture, such factors shall also be considered in ruling on the petition for expedited release.
( e ) A petition for expedited release must be received by the appropriate seizing agency within 20 days from the date of the first publication of the notice of seizure in order to be considered by the seizing agency. The petition must be executed and sworn to by the owner and both the envelope and the request must be clearly marked “PETITION FOR EXPEDITED RELEASE.” Such petition shall be filed with the appropriate office or official identified in the personal written notice and the publication notice.
( f ) The petition shall include the following: ( 1 ) A complete description of the property, including identification numbers, if any, and the date and place of seizure;
( 2 ) The petitioner's interest in the property, which shall be supported by title documentation, bills of sale, contracts, mortgages, or other satisfactory documentary evidence; and
( 3 ) A statement of the facts and circumstances, to be established by satisfactory proof, relied upon by the petitioner to justify expedited release of the seized property.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Quotemedia, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David M. Shworan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ David M. Shworan   
|    |  | David M. Shworan       
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer
|    | 
|    |  | November 11, 2004
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report of NMXS.com, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned principal executive officer and the principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date:  February 6, 2006

 

/s/ Richard Govatski

Richard Govatski, President

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

/s/ Teresa Dickey

Teresa Dickey, Treasurer

(Principal Financial Officer)
Roundtable on Interconnectedness and Risk in U.S. Credit Markets 

October 14, 2020

1:00 Welcome and Introduction

• SP Kothari, Chief Economist and Director of the Division of Economic and Risk Analysis,

SEC

1:10 Panel 1: Market Perspective

The economic shock of COVID-19 impacted liquidity and price volatility in our capital markets. It 

also brought to light some of the changes that have taken place since the 2008 global financial 

crisis, including regulatory reforms, changes in market structure and the growth of credit. This 

panel will focus on six credit markets spanning over $40 trillion of outstanding debt, including 

the short-term funding, corporate bond, leveraged loan, residential and commercial real estate, 

and municipal securitiesmarkets. 

Moderator: Sumit Rajpal, Senior Policy Advisor, SEC

• David Finkelstein, Chief Executive Officer, Annaly Capital Management

• Dawn Fitzpatrick, Chief Investment Officer, Soros Fund Management

• Steven Goulart, Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer, MetLife, Inc.

• Barbara Novick, Vice Chairman, BlackRock

• Thomas Wipf, Vice Chairman of Institutional Securities, Morgan Stanley 

2:10 Break

2:20 Fireside Chat

In the U.S. credit markets, banking and non-banking entities and intermediaries are intricately 

interconnected. These interconnections are essential for the functioning of the markets and the 

provision of credit, but these interconnections can also transmit and amplify risks. The COVID-19 

economic shock reverberated through the credit markets in March/April 2020 and the ripple 

effects continue to be felt. Participants in the fireside chat will discuss these and other issues.

Moderator: Jay Clayton, Chairman, SEC

• Mark Carney, COP 26 Finance Adviser and UN Special Envoy

• Gary Cohn, former Director of the U.S. National Economic Council

• Glenn Hutchins, Chairman, North Island

• Lorie Logan, Executive Vice President, Markets Group, Federal Reserve Bank of New

York 

3:20 Break
3:30 Panel 2: Regulatory Perspective

The COVID-19 economic shock tested the resilience of the U.S. and international financial 

markets and the effects of monetary interventions and fiscal measuresin jurisdictions around the 

globe. This panel will discuss what areas of the markets functioned well, which areas showed 

signs of stress, and where there may still be vulnerabilities. 

Moderator: SP Kothari, Chief Economist and Director of the Division of Economic and Risk 

Analysis, SEC

• Tobias Adrian, Financial Counsellor and Director, Monetaryand Capital Markets

Department, International Monetary Fund

• Natasha Cazenave, Deputy Secretary General in charge of Policy and International 

Affairs(France)

• Andreas Lehnert , Director, Division of Financial Stability, Boardof Governors of the

Federal Reserve System

• Brent McIntosh, Under Secretary for International Affairs, U.S. Department of the

Treasury

4:30 Closing Remarks

• Mohamed El-Erian, President of Queens’ College, Advisor to Allianz and Gramercy
### §425j. Authorization of appropriation

To enable the Secretary of the Interior to begin to carry out the provisions of sections 425 to 425j of this title, including the condemnation, purchase, or lease of the necessary lands, surveys, maps, marking the boundaries of the park, opening, constructing, or repairing necessary roads, pay and expenses of commissioners, salaries for labor and services, traveling expenses, supplies and materials, the sum of $50,000 is authorized to be appropriated out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to remain available until expended, and such additional sums are authorized to be appropriated from time to time as may be necessary for the completion of the project and for the proper maintenance of said park. All disbursements under said sections shall be annually reported by the Secretary of the Interior to Congress.

(Feb. 14, 1927, ch. 127, §11, 44 Stat. 1094; Ex. Ord. No. 6166, §2, June 10, 1933; Ex. Ord. No. 6228, §1, July 28, 1933.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Transfer of administrative functions of park, see note set out under section 425 of this title.