alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 91.22 Definitions. ( a ) *The Act* means the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, Subtitle A of Title II, Public Law 103-322, 108 Stat. 1796 (September 13, 1994) as amended by the Fiscal Year 1996 Omnibus Consolidated Rescissions and Appropriations Act, Public Law 104-134 (April 26, 1996), codified at 42 U.S.C. 13701 *et. seq.*
( b ) *Assistant Attorney General* means the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Justice Programs.
( c ) *Tribal lands* means: ( 1 ) All land within the limits of any Indian reservation under the jurisdiction of the United States Government, notwithstanding the issuance of any patent, and including rights-of-way running through the reservation;
( 2 ) All dependent Indian communities within the borders of the United States whether within the original or subsequently acquired territory thereof, and whether within or without the limits of a State; and
( 3 ) All Indian allotments, the Indian titles to which have not been extinguished, including rights-of way running through the same.
( d ) *Indian Tribe* means an eligible Native American tribe as defined by the Indian Self Determination Act, 25 U.S.C. 450b(e).
( e ) *Construction* means the erection, acquisition, renovation, repair, remodeling, or expansion of new or existing buildings or other physical facilities, and the acquisition or installation of fixed furnishings and equipment. It includes facility planning (including environmental impact analysis), pre-architectural programming, architectural design, preservation, construction, administration, construction management, or project management costs. Construction does not include the purchase of land.
[61 FR 49970, Sept. 24, 1996, as amended at 69 FR 2299, Jan. 15, 2004]
#### § 636.501 What issues may be addressed in discussions?

In a competitive acquisition, discussions may include bargaining. The term bargaining may include: persuasion, alteration of assumptions and positions, give-and-take, and may apply to price, schedule, technical requirements, type of contract, or other terms of a proposed contract.
#### § 657.1 Purpose.

To prescribe requirements for administering a program of vehicle size and weight enforcement on the Interstate System, and those routes which, prior to October 1, 1991, were designated as part of the Federal-aid primary, Federal-aid secondary, or Federal-aid urban systems, including the required annual certification by the State.

[72 FR 7747, Feb. 20, 2007]
Case 15-14286-BFK Doc 82 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/11/20 16:01:20 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 7
Case 15-14286-BFK Doc 82 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/11/20 16:01:20 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 7
Case 15-14286-BFK Doc 82 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/11/20 16:01:20 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 7
Case 15-14286-BFK Doc 82 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/11/20 16:01:20 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 7
Case 15-14286-BFK Doc 82 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/11/20 16:01:20 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 7
Case 15-14286-BFK Doc 82 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/11/20 16:01:20 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 7
Case 15-14286-BFK Doc 82 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/11/20 16:01:20 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 7
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                               5
<MULTIPLIER>                                                    1,000,000
<CURRENCY>                                                   U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                  MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                         1
<CASH>                                                                 78
<SECURITIES>                                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         893
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           28
<INVENTORY>                                                           459
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                    1,526
<PP&E>                                                              1,560
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        573
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                      3,604
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                               1,504
<BONDS>                                                             1,810
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                                             0
<COMMON>                                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                                          (429)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                        3,604
<SALES>                                                             1,361
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                    1,361
<CGS>                                                               1,018
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       1,018
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      241
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        1
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                     49
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                        53
<INCOME-TAX>                                                           19
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                    34
<DISCONTINUED>                                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                         9
<CHANGES>                                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                                           25
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                           0
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the AnnualReport of Hawkins, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended March30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the Report), I, Marvin E. Dee, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Marvin  E. Dee       |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |
|                     |
| Marvin E.  Dee           |
| Chief  Financial Officer |
| June 27,  2003           |

 

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toHawkins, Inc. and will be retained by Hawkins, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
#### § 701.17 Preservation of records.

The Office shall preserve all correspondence relating to the requests it receives under this part, and all records processed pursuant to such requests, until such time as the destruction of such correspondence and records is authorized pursuant to title 44 of the United States Code. Under no circumstances shall records be destroyed while they are the subject of a pending request, appeal, or lawsuit under the FOIA.
§ 45.11 Reporting to the Office of the Inspector General. Department of Justice employees have a duty to, and shall, report to the Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General, or to their supervisor or their component's internal affairs office for referral to the Office of the Inspector General: ( a ) Any allegation of waste, fraud, or abuse in a Department program or activity;
( b ) Any allegation of criminal or serious administrative misconduct on the part of a Department employee (except those allegations of misconduct that are required to be reported to the Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility pursuant to § 45.12); and
( c ) Any investigation of allegations of criminal misconduct against any Department employee.
[Order No. 2835-2006, 71 FR 54414, Sept. 15, 2006]
___________________________________________________________________ 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

before the 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 98236 / August 29, 2023 

WHISTLEBLOWER AWARD PROCEEDING 

File No. 2023-82

_________________________________________________________________ 

In the Matter of the Claim for Award 

in connection with 

Redacted

Redacted

Redacted

Notice of Covered Action Redacted

ORDER DETERMINING WHISTLEBLOWER AWARD CLAIM 

The Claims Review Staff (“CRS”) issued a Preliminary Determination recommending 

that (“Claimant”) receive a whistleblower award of $600,000 which represents 

percent ( %) of the monetary sanctions collected in 

(“Covered Action”).1

Redacted Redacted

Redacted

Redacted***

 The recommendation of the CRS is adopted. The record demonstrates that Claimant 

voluntarily provided original information to the Commission and that this original information 

led to the successful enforcement of the Covered Action.2

as a single 

Commission action because they arose out of the same nucleus of operative facts. See Securities Exchange Act of 

1 Redacted

For purposes of making an award, we have determined to treat these 

1934 (“Exchange Act”) Rule 21F-4(d)(1), 17 C.F.R. § 240.21F-4(d)(1). 

2 See Exchange Act Section 21F(b)(1), 15 U.S.C. § 78u-6(b)(1); Exchange Act Rule 21F-3, 17 C.F.R. § 240.21F-3. 
Redacted

Redacted

In reaching this determination, we considered that the Claimant provided substantial, 

ongoing assistance that included providing key evidence to support the Covered Action; and 

there was a substantial law enforcement interest in the information provided by Claimant given 

that it related to a type of violation that is often difficult to identify and assess. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Claimant shall receive an award of 

percent ( %) of the monetary sanctions collected or to be collected in the Covered Action. *** Redacted

By the Commission. 

Vanessa A. Countryman 

Secretary 

3 

4 

5 

Redacted Redacted

***
#### § 71.11 Referral of complaint and answer to the ALJ.

Upon receipt of an answer, the reviewing official shall file the complaint and answer with the ALJ.
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 288 

Affirming the importance of the long-term solvency of the Highway Trust 

Fund. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 29, 2019 

Mr. BRAUN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Environment and Public Works 

RESOLUTION 

Affirming the importance of the long-term solvency of the 

Highway Trust Fund. 

Whereas, in July 2019, the public debt of the United States 

was more than $22,000,000,000,000, increasing each 

year by a Federal budget deficit of nearly 

$1,000,000,000,000; 

Whereas the Federal Government is facing shortfalls in several Federal trust funds, including the Highway Trust 

Fund, which is expected to reach insolvency in July 

2021; 

Whereas the infrastructure of the United States needs substantial investment in order to continue supporting the 

growing economy of the United States; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 288 IS 

Whereas, according to a report published in 2015 by the Federal Highway Administration, 20 percent of the Federalaid highways in the United States were in poor condition; 

Whereas short-term extensions providing funding to the 

Highway Trust Fund do not provide the certainty needed 

by States and local governments to enter into long-term 

roadbuilding contracts; and 

Whereas short-term extensions providing funding to the 

Highway Trust Fund, based solely on deficit spending, 

exacerbate the problem described in the preceding whereas clause and only serve to postpone solving the problem: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that— 

2 (1) the Highway Trust Fund should achieve 

3 long-term solvency through user fees; and 

4 (2) any spending on Federal highway programs 

5 during the next reauthorization period that exceeds 

6 current Highway Trust Fund revenues and balances 

7 should be fully offset. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
### §3173. Stikine River region; Presidential study and report to Congress

Congress finds that there is a need to study the effect of this Act upon the ability of the Government of Canada to obtain access in the Stikine River region of southeast Alaska. Accordingly, within five years from December 2, 1980, the President shall consult with the Government of Canada and shall submit a report to the Congress containing his findings and recommendations concerning the need, if any, to provide for such access. Such report shall include, among other things, an analysis of the need for access and the social, environmental and economic impacts which may result from various forms of access including, but not limited to, a road along the Stikine and Iskut Rivers, or other alternative routes, should such access be permitted.

(Pub. L. 96–487, title XI, §1113, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2466.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 96–487, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2466, known as the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3101 of this title and Tables.
#### § 260.101 Purpose.

To establish policy for the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Fellowship and Scholarship Programs as administered by the National Highway Institute (NHI).
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Investment Company Act Release No. 35051; 812-15511

Jackson Credit Opportunities Fund and Jackson National Asset Management, LLC

November 16, 2023

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission” or “SEC”).

ACTION: Notice.

Notice of an application under section 6(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Act”) 

for an exemption from sections 18(a)(2), 18(c) and 18(i) of the Act, under sections 6(c) and 23(c) 

of the Act for an exemption from rule 23c-3 under the Act, and for an order pursuant to section 

17(d) of the Act and rule 17d-1 under the Act.

Summary of Application: Applicants request an order to permit certain registered closed-end 

investment companies to issue multiple classes of shares and to impose asset-based distribution 

and/or service fees and early withdrawal charges.

Applicants: Jackson Credit Opportunities Fund and Jackson National Asset Management, LLC

Filing Dates: The application was filed on October 2, 2023.

Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the requested relief will be issued unless 

the Commission orders a hearing. Interested persons may request a hearing on any application 

by e-mailing the SEC’s Secretary at Secretarys-Office@sec.gov and serving the Applicants with 

a copy of the request by e-mail, if an e-mail address is listed for the relevant Applicant below, or 

personally or by mail, if a physical address is listed for the relevant Applicant below. Hearing 

requests should be received by the Commission by 5:30 p.m. on December 11, 2023, and should 

be accompanied by proof of service on the Applicants, in the form of an affidavit, or, for 

lawyers, a certificate of service. Pursuant to rule 0-5 under the Act, hearing requests should state 
2

the nature of the writer’s interest, any facts bearing upon the desirability of a hearing on the 

matter, the reason for the request, and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a 

hearing may request notification by emailing the Commission’s Secretary. 

ADDRESSES: The Commission: Secretarys-Office@sec.gov. Applicants: Emily J. Bennett, 

Esq., Jackson National Asset Management, LLC, emily.bennett@jackson.com; with a copy to 

Paulita A. Pike, Esq., Ropes & Gray LLP, paulita.pike@ropesgray.com. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Trace W. Rakestraw, Senior Special Counsel, at 

(202) 551-6825 (Division of Investment Management, Chief Counsel’s Office).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For Applicants’ representations, legal analysis, and 

conditions, please refer to Applicants’ application, dated October 2, 2023, which may be 

obtained via the Commission’s website by searching for the file number at the top of this 

document, or for an Applicant using the Company name search field on the SEC’s EDGAR 

system. The SEC’s EDGAR system may be searched at 

https://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/legacy/companysearch.html. You may also call the 

SEC’s Public Reference Room at (202) 551-8090.

For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, under delegated 

authority.

Sherry R. Haywood,

Assistant Secretary.
## 2003 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

2-25-2003 

# Dluho s v . S tr a sb e rg

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : P r e c e de n t i al

D ock e t 01-3713

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2003

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2003 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du

. 

## R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" Dluhos v . S tr as be r g " (2003). 2003 D e cisio n s

. P a pe r 769. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2003/769

### PRECEDENTIAL

Filed February 25, 2003

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 01-3713

ERIC DLUHOS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.
ANNA STRASBERG; MARK ROESLER, Esquire, JANE DOE, a/k/a Marilyn.cmgworldwide.com; CMG WORLDWIDE, INC.; THE ESTATE OF LEE STRASBERG; THE LEE STRASBERG THEATRE INSTITUTE; NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC., and JOHN DOES/JANE DOES (1-10),

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.C. No. 00-CV-03163) District Judge: The Honorable John C. Lifland

Argued: January 16, 2003

Before: ROTH, FUENTES and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AMENDING SLIP OPINION

It is ordered that the opinion in the above filed February 20, 2003 be and is hereby amended as follows:

On page 2, delete "Foundation" and substitute"Forum" in its place.

On page 2, delete "Sheri Claire Lewis" and substitute "Shari Claire Lewis."

On page 12, delete "a UDRP proceeding settles a disputed proceeding only to the extent that a season-finale cliffhanger resolves a sitcom’s storyline -- that is, it doesn’t." Substitute in its place "a UDRP proceeding settlesa domain-name dispute only to the extent that a seasonfinale cliffhanger resolves a sitcom’s storyline-- that is, it doesn’t."

On page 14, delete "This decision in no way reflects an intimation that the NAF panel erred in its judgment, but merely that UDRP resolutions do not fall under the limited judicial review of arbitrators of the FAA." Substitute in its place "This decision in no way reflects an intimation that the NAP panel erred in its judgment, but merely that UDRP

### resolutions do not fall under the limited judicial review of

the FAA."

/s/Ruggero J. Aldisert Circuit Judge

Dated: February 25, 2003

A True Copy: Teste:

Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

2
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 97-20171

Summary Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

JORGE LUIS GARCIA,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-95-CR-142-10

_________________________________________________________________

April 16, 1997

Before KING, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jorge Luis Garcia appeals from the district court’s order

affirming the magistrate judge’s order of detention pending trial.

The district court’s decision rests on its conclusion that Garcia

presents a danger to the community and a risk of flight, and that

no conditions will reasonably assure Garcia’s appearance. 18

U.S.C. § 3142(e) & (f). The district court’s conclusion is
2

supported by the record. See United States v. Rueben, 974 F.2d

580, 586 (5th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 940 (1993). The

district court’s detention order is AFFIRMED. The Government’s

motion to consolidate is DENIED.

AFFIRMED. MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE DENIED.
§ 94.108 Prohibited supplantation of funding for administrative costs. ( a ) *Non-supplantation requirement.* SAAs may not use VOCA funding to supplant State administrative support for the State crime victim assistance program. Consistent with the DOJ Grants Financial Guide, such supplantation is the deliberate reduction of State funds because of the availability of VOCA funds. Where a State decreases its administrative support for the State crime victim assistance program, the SAA must submit, upon request from OVC, an explanation for the decrease.
( b ) *Baseline for administrative costs.* In each year in which an SAA uses VOCA funds for administration, it shall— ( 1 ) Establish and document a baseline level of non-VOCA funding required to administer the State victim assistance program, based on SAA expenditures for administrative costs during that fiscal year and the previous fiscal year, prior to expending VOCA funds for administration; and
( 2 ) Submit the certification required by 34 U.S.C. 20110(h), which, as of July 8, 2016, requires an SAA to certify here that VOCA funds will not be used to supplant State funds, but will be used to increase the amount of such funds that would, in the absence of VOCA funds, be made available for administrative purposes.
[81 FR 44528, July 8, 2016, as amended at 88 FR 3657, Jan. 20, 2023]
### SUBCHAPTER LIX–GG—CEDAR CREEK AND BELLE GROVE NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK
NATHANIEL W. WYATT

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 3957

_____ ________________________/

Opinion filed January 22, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Gary L. Bergosh , Judge

.

Nathaniel W. Wyatt, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER C URIAM.

AFFIRMED.

THOMAS, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.