alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 203 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 203

  Recognizing the 80th anniversary of the Aircraft Owners and Pilots 
                              Association.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 13, 2019

  Mr. Inhofe (for himself, Ms. Duckworth, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Moran, Mr. 
Roberts, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Daines, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Sullivan, and Mr. Van 
 Hollen) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing the 80th anniversary of the Aircraft Owners and Pilots 
                              Association.

Whereas on May 15, 2019, the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (referred to 
        in this preamble as ``AOPA''), will celebrate 80 years of successfully 
        representing the interests of general aviation pilots and private 
        aircraft ownership across the United States;
Whereas AOPA was formed on May 15, 1939, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in the 
        years leading up to the entry of the United States into World War II;
Whereas AOPA has grown into the largest aviation association in the world;
Whereas AOPA has an ongoing legacy of successfully representing the interests of 
        general aviation pilots and private aircraft owners across the United 
        States;
Whereas general aviation plays an important role in the economic vitality of 
        communities across the United States, creating jobs and opportunities 
        for growth throughout the United States;
Whereas approximately 5,000 public-use airports and 15,000 other landing 
        facilities support the United States general aviation fleet of nearly 
        200,000 aircraft and approximately 600,000 pilots;
Whereas AOPA tirelessly advocates for and contributes to improving the safety of 
        aviation;
Whereas AOPA is committed to growing the pilot population by introducing young 
        people to career opportunities and welcoming more women and minorities 
        into aviation;
Whereas in the 80 years since AOPA was formed the organization has been led by 
        only 5 presidents: Joseph B. ``Doc'' Hartranft, John L. Baker, Philip B. 
        Boyer, Craig L. Fuller, and Mark R. Baker; and
Whereas AOPA remains committed to protecting and promoting aviation in the 
        United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate, on the occasion of the 80th anniversary 
of the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association, recognizes the efforts 
of the association in--
            (1) helping to ensure the freedom to fly; and
            (2) leaving a lasting legacy for future generations of 
        aviators.
                                 <all>
```
### §3846. Regulations

#### (a) In general

The Secretary shall promulgate such regulations as are necessary to implement programs under this chapter, including such regulations as the Secretary determines to be necessary to ensure a fair and reasonable application of the limitations established under section 3844(f) of this title.

#### (b) Rulemaking procedure

The promulgation of regulations and administration of programs under this chapter—

(1) shall be carried out without regard to chapter 35 of title 44 (commonly known as the Paperwork Reduction Act); and

(2) shall be made as an interim rule effective on publication with an opportunity for notice and comment.

#### (c) Congressional review of agency rulemaking

In promulgating regulations under this section, the Secretary shall use the authority provided under section 808 of title 5.

(Pub. L. 99–198, title XII, §1246, as added Pub. L. 113–79, title II, §2608, Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 761.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (b), was in the original "this title", meaning title XII of Pub. L. 99–198, which enacted this chapter and former section 2005a of this title and amended sections 590g, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2009 of this title, sections 4207 and 4209 of Title 7, Agriculture, and provisions set out as a note under section 1981 of Title 7.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3846, Pub. L. 99–198, title XII, §1246, as added Pub. L. 101–624, title XIV, §1444, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3602, directed Secretary to report to Congress on erodible land and wetland conservation program, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 104–66, title I, §1011(a), Dec. 21, 1995, 109 Stat. 709.
Stewart D. Gregg, Second VP & Senior Counsel
Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America
5701 Golden Hills Drive
Minneapolis, MN  55416
(763) 765-2913

April 27, 2004

Board of Directors

Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America
5701 Golden Hills Drive
Minneapolis, MN  55416

Re:     Opinion and Consent of Counsel
        Allianz Life Variable Account B

Dear Sir or Madam:

You have requested my Opinion of Counsel in connection  with the filing with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, of Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form
N-4 for the  Individual  Deferred  Variable  Annuity  Contracts  to be issued by
Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America and its separate account,Allianz
Life Variable Account B File No. 333-101812.

I am of the following opinions:

1.   Allianz Life Variable  Account B is a unit investment trust as that term is
     defined in Section  4(2) of the  Investment  Company Act of 1940 (the Act),
     and is currently  registered  with the Securities and Exchange  Commission,
     pursuant to Section 8(a) of the Act.

2.   Upon the acceptance of purchase  payments made by a Contract Owner pursuant
     to a Contract  issued in accordance  with the  Prospectus  contained in the
     Registration  Statement and upon  compliance  with  applicable  law, such a
     Contract  Owner  will  have a  legally-issued,  fully-paid,  non-assessable
     contractual interest under such Contract.

You  may  use  this  opinion  letter,  or  copy  hereof,  as an  exhibit  to the
Registration Statement.

I consent to the  reference to me and to this opinion  under the caption  "Legal
Opinions"  contained in the  Statements of Additional  Information  which form a
part of the Registration Statement.

Sincerely,

ALLIANZ LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA

By: /s/ Stewart D. Gregg

    ------------------------------
        Stewart D. Gregg
#### §§ 42.716-42.719 [Reserved]
§ 65.22 Exclusions. Excluded from the situations for which this assistance is intended are: ( a ) The perceived need for planning or other activities related to crowd control for general public safety projects; and,
( b ) A situation requiring the enforcement of laws associated with scheduled public events, including political conventions and sports events.
### §410ffff–5. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this subchapter, except that not more than $4,000,000 may be appropriated for the acquisition of real and personal property.

(Pub. L. 101–485, §7, Oct. 31, 1990, 104 Stat. 1173; Pub. L. 105–363, §1(b), Nov. 10, 1998, 112 Stat. 3296.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Pub. L. 105–363 substituted "$4,000,000" for "$1,500,000".
§ 46.110 Expedited review procedures for certain kinds of research involving no more than minimal risk, and for minor changes in approved research. ( a ) The Secretary, HHS, has established, and published as a Notice in the Federal Register, a list of categories of research that may be reviewed by the IRB through an expedited review procedure. The list will be amended, as appropriate after consultation with other departments and agencies, through periodic republication by the Secretary, HHS, in the Federal Register. A copy of the list is available from the Office for Human Research Protections, HHS, or any successor office.
( b ) An IRB may use the expedited review procedure to review either or both of the following: ( 1 ) Some or all of the research appearing on the list and found by the reviewer(s) to involve no more than minimal risk,
( 2 ) Minor changes in previously approved research during the period (of one year or less) for which approval is authorized. Under an expedited review procedure, the review may be carried out by the IRB chairperson or by one or more experienced reviewers designated by the chairperson from among members of the IRB. In reviewing the research, the reviewers may exercise all of the authorities of the IRB except that the reviewers may not disapprove the research. A research activity may be disapproved only after review in accordance with the non-expedited procedure set forth in § 46.108(b).
( c ) Each IRB which uses an expedited review procedure shall adopt a method for keeping all members advised of research proposals which have been approved under the procedure.
( d ) The department or agency head may restrict, suspend, terminate, or choose not to authorize an institution's or IRB's use of the expedited review procedure.
[56 FR 28012, 28020, June 18, 1991, as amended at 70 FR 36328, June 23, 2005]
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-81,719-02

EX P ARTE KERRYDON WALLACE, Appl icant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. W13-31162-I (B) IN THE CRIMINA L DIST RICT COURT NO. TWO F ROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1 9 6 7 ). Applicant was convicted of the offense of unauthorized use of a

motor vehicle a

nd sentenc ed to imprisonment for two y ear s. T h e Ap p l i cant alleg es, inter alia , that prison officia ls are incorre ctly calc ulating hi s mandatory supervision rele ase date, his m ax imum discharg e date, and his prison entry date. I n response to Applicant’s cla ims, the St ate a sserts the following :

I n his second, third, and fifth gro u n d s for relief , Applicant raises various issues related to the TDCJ ’s calc u l at i ons reg arding his projec ted rele ase date onto mandatory

supervision, his max imum ex piration date, a nd his TDCJ entry

date.Fur ther evidenc e is neede d in order to addre ss Applicant’s claims. There fore , the State reque sts that this Court issue an order desi gn at i ng issues and g ather evidenc e, as is customary , by way of aff idavit from the appropr iate repr esentative of the Texas Depa

rtment of Criminal J ustice, B oard of Pardons and Par oles. Given the State’s response in this matter, we rema nd this application to the Criminal District Court No. Two of Dallas County to allow the trial judge to complete an evidentiar y investigation and enter finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law. This application will be held in abey ance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 day s of th i s o rd er . A supplemental transcr ipt containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hear ing or deposition, along with the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be for war ded to t his Court within 120 day s of t he date of this order. A ny extensions of ti me shall be obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: September 17, 2014 Do not publish
#### George W. Reed v. Daniel Horne.

1. Bill op *exceptions—when necessary.*Where a plea is stricken from the flies on motion, both the motion and exceptions to the decision of the court thereon should be preserved by bill of exceptions, as they can not otherwise become a part of the record.

*5992. Assessing damages. On default, where neither party asks for a jury, it is proper for the court to assess damages.

Weit of Eeeoe to the Superior Court of Coolc county; the Hon. William A. Postee, Judge, presiding.

Mr. J. H. Kmowltoe, for the plaintiff in error.

Mr. Justice Scott

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The errors assigned are, the Superior Court erred in striking the plea from the files for want of an affidavit of merits, and in reference to and assessing damages by the court. It is suggested in argument, the plea was stricken out of the record upon the supposition the act concerning the practice of the courts of Cook county, of February 12, 1853, which required the defendant in all civil actions to file with his plea an affidavit of merits, wa.s still in force. The record contains no bill of exceptions, and we can not know the ground of the decision by the court.

It is fatal to the objection taken, that neither the motion nor any exception to the decision of the court striking out the plea is preserved by a bill of exceptions, as required by the rules of practice in this court. Such motions do not become a part of the record unless made so by means of a bill of exceptions. The rule on this subject was declared in *Snell*v. *M. E. Church,*58 Ill. 290, and that case is conclusive of the same question in the case at bar.

¡Neither party asked to have the damages assessed by a jury, and in such cases the statute expressly authorizes the court to make the assessment. Gross’ Statutes, p. 512, sec. 23.

¡No error appearing, the judgment must be affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-23-00458-CV

Sergio Chavez and Maria D. Garcia

v.

Alejandro Moreno

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 1 of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CL-23-2594-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellants.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

February 1, 2024
P.O. Box 95592

2542 Singletree Lane

South Jordan, Utah 84095

Re: Proposed Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permit for Pio Pico Energy CenterDear Mr. Chandler:

EPA has completed its review of your application for a Clean Air Act Prevention of Significant Deterioration (“PSD”) permit that would authorize the construction and operation ofthe Pio Pico Energy Center (“Project”) in San Diego County, California. The application is for a 300 MW simple cycle natural gas-fired power plant. We have prepared a proposed PSD permit for the Project.

permit

We have issued a public notice announcing a 30-day comment period on EPA’s proposal to issue the PSD and a public hearing that will take place in San Diego, CA on July 24, 2012 to receive comments from the public on our proposed pennit and supporting analysis. The public comment period is scheduled to close on July 24, 2012.

We have enclosed copies of our public notice, proposed permit, and the Fact SheetlArnbient Air Quality

website

impact Report for the Project. These and other documents related to the Project are also available on our at http://www.epa.gov/regiono9/air/permit/r9-permits-issued.html.

If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Roger Kohn at 415- 972-3973 or kohn.rogerepa.gov.

Sincerely,

: /

-)

Gerardo C. Rios

Chief, Permits Office

Fnclosures

cc: Steve 1-lill, Sierra Research

Toni Weeks, San Diego County Air Pollution Control District

Eric K. Solorio, California Energy Commission

Michael Tollstrup, California Air Resources Board

Printed on Recycled Paper
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED 
DECEMBER 31, 1995, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO ITS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                     DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                           40,728
<SECURITIES>                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                    194,256
<ALLOWANCES>                     0
<INVENTORY>                      63,616
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 298,600
<PP&E>                           8,704,558
<DEPRECIATION>                   (300,200)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   8,702,958
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            316,329
<BONDS>                          0
<COMMON>                         240,573
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            0
<PREFERRED>                      0
<OTHER-SE>                       8,146,056
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     8,702,958
<SALES>                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 7,500
<CGS>                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    511,974
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 (67,514)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 (336)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               675
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (437,299)
<INCOME-TAX>                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              0
<DISCONTINUED>                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  0
<CHANGES>                        0
<NET-INCOME>                     (437,299)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                    (.02)

        

</TABLE>
§ 15.13 Notice of hearing. ( a ) Whenever the initiating official, in consultation with the Secretary, finds, based upon available information gathered or provided, that treating an individual as an employee of the Public Health Service may expose the Government to an unreasonably high degree of risk of loss, the initiating official shall notify the individual that an administrative hearing will be conducted for the purpose of determining whether treating the individual as an employee of the Public Health Service for purposes of 42 U.S.C. 233 would expose the United States to an unreasonably high degree of risk of loss.
( b ) The notice of hearing shall be in writing and shall be sent by registered or certified mail to the individual at the individual's last known address, or to the individual's attorney in the event the Attorney General has received written notice that the individual has retained counsel.
( c ) The notice shall contain: ( 1 ) A statement of the nature and purpose of the hearing;
( 2 ) The factual allegations and, where appropriate, the law asserted in support of the proposed action;
( 3 ) The name of the administrative law judge;
( 4 ) A statement of the nature of the action proposed to be taken; and
( 5 ) A statement of the time, date, and location of the hearing.
( d ) The hearing shall be initiated not sooner than 60 days of the date on the written notice of hearing.
#### § 570.22 Designation.

Inmates will be considered for pre-release community confinement in a manner consistent with 18 U.S.C. section 3621(b), determined on an individual basis, and of sufficient duration to provide the greatest likelihood of successful reintegration into the community, within the time-frames set forth in this part.
#### § 650.503 Applicability.

The National Tunnel Inspection Standards (NTIS) in this subpart apply to all structures defined as highway tunnels on all public roads, on and off Federal-aid highways, including tribally and federally owned tunnels.
#### Chastain *v.*Lumpkin & Wright.

March 3, 1910.

Motion to set aside judgment. Before Judge Edwards. Walker - superior court.

December 8, 1908.

*J. E. Rosser*and 17. *M. Henry,*for plaintiff in error..

*Lumpicin*c§ *Wright,*by *John M. Graham,*contra..

Per Curiam.

Where counsel prepared and filed a petition in behalf of a-wife against her husband, praying for a divorce and for alimony permanent and temporary, and before the defendant was served the wife notified her counsel and the sheriff in writing that she had withdrawn the suit, and directed her counsel to proceed no further with the case, and where-it further appeared that the husband and wife had “resumed their relations to each other as husband and wife,” the wife’s counsel can not thereafter press the case, over the wife’s protest, by having service of the petition perfected and obtaining a judgment for fees.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, C. J., absent, and Lumpkin, J., disqualified.*
Creation Date Fri Feb  6, 1998  05:32 PM                            Page    1
CMB96A

From: The Chase Manhattan Bank

To:   Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.


                   MONTHLY CERTIFICATEHOLDER'S REPORT
                   ----------------------------------

Due Period 24 Beginning Date                     01/01/1998
Due Period 24 End Date                           01/31/1998
Determination Date                               02/10/1998
Remittance Date                                  02/17/1998


I.    Monthly Principal and Principal Carryover Shortfall to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                  $ 20.0022218842

II.   Monthly Interest and Unpaid Interest to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                   $ 1.6103294793

III.  Monthly Expenses Summary

      A. Servicing Fee Disbursement                                $ 456,548.15
      B. Cash Collateral Account Expense                                 $ 0.00
      C. Total Expenses paid
         (per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                $ 0.3096787434

IV.   Cash Collateral Account Deposit Amount                             $ 0.00

V.    Outstanding Advance Summary

      A. From Prior Period                                       $ 4,063,939.34
      B. From Current Period                                     $ 3,793,149.51
      C. Change in Amount Between Periods (Lines B - A)           $ -270,789.83

VI.   Pool Factor Information

      A. Certificate Principal Balance                         $ 518,369,233.54
      B. Initial Certificate Balance                         $ 1,474,263,764.33
      C. Pool Factor (Lines A / B)                               0.351612273246

VII.  Available Cash Collateral Account Information for Due Period

      A. Available Cash Collateral Amount                       $ 27,392,889.22
      B. Available Cash Collateral Amount Percentage            4.999999999361%

VIII. Required Cash Collateral Amount

      A. For the Current Collection Period                      $ 27,392,889.22
      B. For the Next Collection Period                         $ 25,918,461.68
#### §§ 36.407-36.499 [Reserved]