alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

      ( print page 15984)    
In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

*Time and Date:*                         8 a.m.-5 p.m., May 3, 2011 (Closed).                    

*Place:*                         Sheraton Gateway Hotel Atlanta Airport, 1900 Sullivan Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30337,                         *Telephone:*                         (770) 997-1100.                    

*Status:*                         The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.                    

*Matters To Be Discussed:*                         The meeting will include the initial review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to “Combining Subjective and Objective Methods for Quantifying Contact Rates and Mixing Pattern in School-Aged Children, FOA CK11-006.”                    

*Contact Person For More Information:*                         Gregory Anderson, M.S., M.P.H., Scientific Review Officer, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop E60, Atlanta, Georgia 30333,                         *Telephone:*                         (404) 498-2293. The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Dated: February 25, 2011.

Elaine L. Baker,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2011-6641 Filed 3-21-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
# C_2011252EN.01002808.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/28

---

Order of the President of the Court of 21 June 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the the Tribunale di Rovereto (Italy)) — Criminal proceedings against John Austine

(Case C-63/11) (1)

1

2011/C 252/67

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 120, 16.4.2011.

1

---
Stay healthy.

Wash your hands.

are all around you.

CS294906-F

PN300506 www.cdc.gov/handwashing
### **CHAPTER 21—PROHIBITION OF FOREIGN FISHING VESSELS IN THE TERRITORIAL WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES**
§ 505.5 Waiver of fee by Warden. The Warden may reduce or waive the fee if the inmate establishes that: ( a ) He or she is not able and, even with the use of a reasonable installment schedule, is not likely to become able to pay all or part of the fee, or
( b ) Imposition of a fee would unduly burden the inmate's dependents.
#### § 706.411 Effect of statements on other requirements.

The statements of employment and financial interests and supplementary statements required of employees are in addition to, and not in substitution for or in derogation of any similar requirement imposed by law, order, or regulation. The submission of a statement or supplementary statement by an employee does not permit him or any other person to participate in a matter in which he or the other person's participation is prohibited by law, order, or regulation.
Order entered August 20, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00354-CV

PAMELLA JOINER, Appellant

V.

THE WEITZMAN GROUP, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-16489

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s August 18, 2022 unopposed second motion 

for an extension of time to file her brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion 

and extend the time to September 19, 2022. We caution appellant that further 

extension requests will be disfavored.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 99.3

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of ITS Networks Inc.
(the  Company)  for  the  quarter  ended  December  31,  2003, as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the  Report), the
undersigned  Chief  Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
each  hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     1.  The  Report  fully  complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  May 20, 2004


     -----------------------------            -------------------------------
     Gustavo Gomez, Director,                 Herman  de  Haas,
     Chief Executive Officer,                 Director, Executive Vice
     President, Chief Financial               President and Chief Operating
     Officer and Treasurer                    Officer
§ 42.722 Recipient assessment of age distinctions. ( a ) As part of a compliance review under § 42.730 or complaint investigation under § 42.731, the Department may require a recipient employing the equivalent of 15 or more employees to complete a written self-evaluation, in a manner specified by the responsible Department official, of any age distinction imposed in its program or activity receiving federal financial assistance from the Department to assess the recipient's compliance with the Act.
( b ) Whenever a recipient assessment indicates a violation of the Act and this subpart, the recipient shall take corrective action.
§ 540.100 Purpose and scope. ( a ) The Bureau of Prisons extends telephone privileges to inmates as part of its overall correctional management. Telephone privileges are a supplemental means of maintaining community and family ties that will contribute to an inmate's personal development. An inmate may request to call a person of his or her choice outside the institution on a telephone provided for that purpose. However, limitations and conditions may be imposed upon an inmate's telephone privileges to ensure that these are consistent with other aspects of the Bureau's correctional management responsibilities. In addition to the procedures set forth in this subpart, inmate telephone use is subject to those limitations which the Warden determines are necessary to ensure the security or good order, including discipline, of the institution or to protect the public. Restrictions on inmate telephone use may also be imposed as a disciplinary sanction (see 28 CFR part 541).
( b ) Except as provided in this rule, the Warden shall permit an inmate who has not been restricted from telephone use as the result of a specific institutional disciplinary sanction to make at least one telephone call each month.
[59 FR 15824, Apr. 4, 1994, as amended at 61 FR 90, Jan. 2, 1996]
#### Ed Keim Builders, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Bernice Webb, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 70-271;

Second District

October 5, 1971.

Carbary, Carbary & Chapski, of Elgin, for appellant.

Donovan, Dichtl, Atten, Mountcastle & Roberts, of Wheaton, for appellee.

Opinion by

Mr. JUSTICE SEIDENFELD.
60%

ALCOHOL

Slow the Spread of COVID-19

cdc.gov/coronavirus

CS 318104-A 07/08/2020

WASH YOUR HANDS OFTEN 

WHEN OUT WITH YOUR FRIENDS,

WEAR A CLOTH FACE COVERING

COVER 

YOUR 

COUGHS 

AND 

SNEEZES

STAY HOME IF YOU ARE SICK

CLEAN 

FREQUENTLY 

TOUCHED 

OBJECTS

DO NOT 

TOUCH YOUR 

EYES, NOSE, 

AND MOUTH

AND STAY 

6 FEET APART 

FROM OTHERS

20

SECONDS

60%

ALCOHOL
#### Christian Rodgers, Respondent, v City of New York et al., Respondents, Georgette Miller, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[824 NYS2d 179]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Georgette Miller appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Partnow, J.), dated September 16, 2005, as denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against her.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against the appellant is granted.

As attested to by the plaintiff at his examination before trial, he tripped and fell in a hole located in front of premises known as 751 Union Street, in Brooklyn. He subsequently commenced this action in which the appellant, among others, was named as a defendant.

The Supreme Court improperly denied the appellant’s motion for summary judgment. Generally, “liability for a dangerous *556condition on real property must be predicated upon occupancy, ownership, control, or special use of the premises” *(Cuce v Bell Atl. Corp.,*299 AD2d 387, 388 [2002] [internal quotation marks omitted]; *see Elbert v J.F.V. Enter. Co.,*234 AD2d 413 [1996]). In the instant case, the appellant established a prima facie case that she owed no duty to the plaintiff by submitting an affidavit indicating that she owned property at 753 Union Street, that she did not contract for any utility or sidewalk work at 751 Union Street on or before the date of the accident, that she had not derived any “special uses” from the sidewalk in front of either 751 or 753 Union Street, and that she did not create a defect or hazardous condition on the sidewalk located in front of either address. The evidence submitted by the plaintiff in opposition to the motion failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see*CPLR 3212 [b]). Moreover, “the plaintiffs ‘mere hope that evidence sufficient to defeat the motion may be uncovered during the discovery process’ was insufficient to defeat summary judgment” *(Sammarco v City of New York,*16 AD3d 657, 658 [2005], quoting *Neryaev v Solon,*6 AD3d 510 [2004]). Crane, J.P., Krausman, Spolzino and Skelos, JJ., concur.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA 

FIFTH DISTRICT 

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME 

EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR 

REHEARING AND DISPOSITION 

THEREOF IF FILED 

DAWAYNE LEE DAVIS, JR.,

Petitioner,

v.

Case No. 5D22-1910 

LT Case No. 2017-CF-000464-A 

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

________________________________/

Opinion filed September 16, 2022

Petition for Belated Appeal

A Case of Original Jurisdiction. 

Dawayne Lee Davis, Jr., Jasper, pro 

se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General 

Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock 

McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, 

Daytona Beach, for Respondent

PER CURIAM. 

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall 

be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the

May 5, 2020 order (and July 22, 2020 rehearing order) denying the motion 
2

for postconviction relief filed in Case 2017-CF-000464-A, Sumter County, 

Florida. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D). 

PETITION GRANTED.

WALLIS, EISNAUGLE and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Dept. of Environmental Protection
Commonwealth News Bureau Room 308, Main Capitol Building Harrisburg PA., 17120

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 04/19/2011

CONTACT: Katy Gresh, Department of Environmental Protection
412-442-4203

DEP Calls on Natural Gas Dril lers to Stop Giving Trea tment Facilities Wastewater Efforts in Motion to Quickly Stop Drilli ng Wastewater from Going to Treatment Works ‘Grandfathered’ by the Previous
A dministration

HARRISBURG -- At the direction of Governor Tom Corbett, acting Department of Envi ronmental Protection Secretary Michael Krancer today called on all Marcellus Shal e natural gas drilling operators to cease by May 19 delivering wastewater from shale gas extraction to 15 facilities that curren tly accept it under special provisions of last year’s Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) regulations.

“While the prior administration allowed certa in facilities to continue to take this wastewater, conditions have changed since t he implementation of the TDS regulat ions,” Krancer said. “We now have more defin itive scientific data, improved technology and increased voluntary wastewater re cycling by industry. We used to have 27 grandfat hered facilities; but over the last year, many have voluntarily decided to stop taking the wastewater and we are now down to only 15. More than half of those facilities are n ow up for permit renewal. Now is the time to take action to end this practice.”

The 2010 revised regulations require publicly owned treatment works and centralized wast e treatment facilities to treat new or increased discharges of TDS to more stringent standards. Remo ving TDS from water also removes bromides. The previous administration, however, chose to allow faci lities that had historically accepted drilling wastewater to continue to accept it, as long as they did not increase thei r input load of wastewater.

Recent surface water sampling has found elevated levels of bromi de in rivers in the Western portion of the state, where the majority of natural gas drilling is taking place. Bromide, itself non-toxic, turns into a co mbination of potent ially unsafe com pounds
called Total Trihalomethanes once it is combined with chlo rine for disinfection at wa ter treatment facilities.

“While there are several possibl e sources for bromide other than shale drilling wastewater, we be lieve that if operators would stop giving wastewater to facilities that cont inue to accept it under the special provis ion, bromide concentrations would quickly an d significantly decrease,” Krancer said.

For more information about DEP, visit www.depweb.state.pa.us

. 

## Page 1 of 1 Print

4/19/2011 htt p ://www.newsroom.de p .state. p a.us/newsroom p ublic/Print.as p x?id=17071&t yp eid=1
§ 527.46 Transfer procedures. ( a ) *Treaty nation determination.* If the Department of Justice approves the transfer request, the treaty nation will be asked if it consents to the transfer of its citizen or national. The inmate will be informed of the determination made by the treaty nation.
( b ) *Transfer to departure institution.* The Bureau and the Department of Justice will arrange for the inmate to be transferred to an appropriate departure institution.
( c ) *Consent verification hearing.* If the treaty nation consents to the transfer, the United States will arrange a consent verification hearing for the prisoner as required by 18 U.S.C. 4107, 4108. This hearing is held before a U.S. Magistrate Judge or other judicial officer as specified in sections 4107 and 4108. The Bureau must ensure that the prisoner is available and present at the consent verification hearing.
( d ) *Transfer to departure institution and foreign retrieval of inmate.* If the foreign national prisoner gives consent to transfer at the consent verification hearing, the Department of Justice will notify the treaty transfer nation.
## Breadcrumb

-  Inicio 
-  Office Of Inspector General 

Parte o todo el contenido en esta página disponible solo en inglés.

# Office of Inspector General

The Office of Inspector General’s mission is to provide independent, objective, and timely oversight to improve the integrity, accountability, and performance of SBA and its programs for the benefit of the American people.

### Report Fraud

Submit a complaint

-  About OIG              Read the Office of Inspector General's mission, statutory documents, and congressional accountability.                  Learn about OIG 
-  Reports              The Office of Inspector General produces audit and evaluation reports to support SBA in achieving its statutory mission.                  Access reports 
-  Pandemic response oversight              Learn about OIG’s oversight of SBA’s programs and operations that are intended to mitigate the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.                  Explore pandemic oversight 
-  OIG Hotline              Report fraud, waste, abuse, mismanagement, or misconduct involving SBA programs or employees through our hotline.                  Submit a complaint 

### Whistleblower Protection

Advice and federal resources

-  Congressional affairs & media              Get OIG congressional affairs and media information.                  Stay informed 
-  Whistleblower protection              The Office of Inspector General investigates whistleblower claims of waste, fraud or abuse, and provides protection for whistleblowers.                  Find information 
-  Protect yourself from scams              Insights and tips on what to lookout for to protect your business from grant fraud, loan fraud, or phishing.                  Protect your business 
-  Connect with OIG              Stay up to date with the Office of Inspector General.                  Get the latest updates 

### Interested in a rewarding and challenging career?

Come work with us
#### Hewlett, administrator, *v.*Watson.

Beck, J.

1. Where upon the hearing, upon appeal to the superior court, of an application for a year’s support to be allowed from the estate of a decedent, by one claiming to be his widow, the only issue for determination was that of marriage vel non, the applicant successfully carried the burden of proving the affirmative of that issue when it was shown by the uncontradicted testimony of the applicant herself, which was admitted without objection, that she had, 14 years previously, intermarried with the decedent; which testimony was corroborated by that of several witnesses, who testified that they had known the decedent and the applicant for periods of time ranging from seven to twelve years, during which time they lived together continuously as husband and wife; testified that the decedent introduced the applicant as his wife, and held her out to the world in general as his wife; and testified to other facts tending to establish, by habit and repute, that the two were in fact man and wife. 1 Wigmore on Evidence, § 268; 8 Enc. Ev. 467, and cases cited; *Clark*v. *Cassidy,*82 *Ga.*407.

*517May 11, 1910.

Year’s support. Before Judge Ellis. Fulton superior court.

JuLy 1, 1909.

*Walter*W. *Visanska,*for plaintiff in error.

*John T. Dennis*and *Virlyn B. Moore,*contra.

2. *No*evidence, direct or circumstantial, except that the decedent had a son at the time of his marriage, appears in the record tending to contradict the evidence introduced by the applicant. The evidence demanded a finding that the applicant was the widow of the decedent, and the court did not err in directing a verdict accordingly.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Administrative Proceedings Rulings

Release No. 6841 / April 11, 2022

Administrative Proceeding

File No. 3-20454

In the Matter of

Kimberly D. Butler,

Prosperity Economics Partners, 

LLC, and

Partners for Prosperity, LLC

Stay Order

The parties have jointly moved for a stay based on an agreement in 

principle to a settlement of the sole remaining issue. The motion is GRANTED, 

and this proceeding is STAYED, subject to compliance with the deadlines set 

forth in 17 C.F.R. § 201.161(c)(2). The parties should promptly notify my office

if any of those deadlines are not met. The schedule set forth in the order of 

January 5, 2022, is CANCELED. 

/s/ James E. Grimes

Chief Administrative Law Judge
OFFICE OF THE ATrORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 
yksrly, uzah thxamlnation te be plsde by (1) same 

oompefent person or perwns deoignstad by the 

Bankha @mdubmer, uho nball be D&S by the 
VW t-4 m-8 

APPRovmJuL 31, 1942 

.6-d-& 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

OS-ME
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2023 KW 0997

VERSUS

KEVIN DUKES JANUARY 18, 2024

In Re: Kevin Dukes, applying for supervisory writs, 19th

Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, 

No. 01- 19- 491. 

BEFORE: GUIDRY, C. J., CHUTZ AND LANIER, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

JMG

WRC

WIL

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

LltEP'UTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
### §3206. Statewide cultural assistance program

In furtherance of the national policy set forth in section 320101 of title 54, and in furtherance of the need to protect and interpret for the public benefit cultural and archeological resources and objects of national significance relating to prehistoric and historic human use and occupation of lands and waters in Alaska, the Secretary may, upon the application of a Native Corporation or Native Group, provide advice, assistance, and technical expertise to the applicant in the preservation, display, and interpretation of cultural resources, without regard as to whether title to such resources is in the United States. Such assistance may include making available personnel to assist in the planning, design, and operation of buildings, facilities, and interpretive displays for the public and personnel to train individuals in the identification, recovery, preservation, demonstration, and management of cultural resources.

(Pub. L. 96–487, title XIII, §1318, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2486.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

In text, "section 320101 of title 54" substituted for "the first section of the Act entitled 'An Act to provide for the preservation of historic American sites, buildings, objects, and antiquities of national significance, and for other purposes', approved August 21, 1935 (49 Stat. 666)" on authority of Pub. L. 113–287, §6(e), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272, which Act enacted Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.