alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99B

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of The Gillette Company (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles W. Cramb,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.

                                         /s/ Charles W. Cramb
                                         ______________________________________
                                         Charles W. Cramb
                                         Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
                                         Officer

Date:  March 5, 2003
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Motorvehicle use map. Jackson and Blackrock Ranger Districts, Bridger-Teton NationalForest, Wyoming**
 
2015: FrontBack | 2016 | 2018: FrontBack
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.28:B 76/18/
Item Number:0080-G (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000950682
 
June 28, 2018
§ 54.520 Job classification and structure. A recipient shall not: ( a ) Classify a job as being for males or for females;
( b ) Maintain or establish separate lines of progression, seniority lists, career ladders, or tenure systems based on sex; or
( c ) Maintain or establish separate lines of progression, seniority systems, career ladders, or tenure systems for similar jobs, position descriptions, or job requirements that classify persons on the basis of sex, unless sex is a bona fide occupational qualification for the positions in question as set forth in § 54.550.
### §410kkk–4. Private property protection

#### (a) Access to private property

Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to—

(1) require any private property owner to permit public access (including Federal, State, or local government access) to such private property; or

(2) modify any provision of Federal, State, or local law with regard to public access to or use of private lands.

#### (b) Liability

Designation of the park shall not be considered to create any liability, or to have any effect on any liability under any other law, of any private property owner with respect to any persons injured on such private property.

#### (c) Recognition of authority to control land use

Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to modify any authority of Federal, State, or local governments to regulate the use of private land within the boundary of the park.

(Pub. L. 108–387, title I, §106, Oct. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 2236.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (c), was in the original "this title", meaning title I of Pub. L. 108–387, Oct. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 2234, which is classified principally to this subchapter. For complete classification of title I to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 410kkk of this title and Tables.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
HOWARD SCHWARTZ,

Petitioner

v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, AND VALUE-ADDED COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,

Respondents

********************************************* VALUE-ADDED COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

v. SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 352 WAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 4th day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED

.
#### § 706.104 Interpretation and advisory service.

The General Counsel will serve as Counselor for the purpose of providing interpretation and advisory assistance to the Council staff on matters covered in this part 706.
FROM: THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, COUNTY OF RAVALLI,

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. ROBERT LEE BAUER, Defendant.

NO. CR-89-31 DECISION

DATED this 8th day of March, 1990.

On July 5, 1989, the Defendant was sentenced to two counts of Theft, 10 years on the felony theft and six months in the County Jail on the misdemeanor theft, to be served concurrently; $510 in restitution to victims and 75 days credit for time served.

On March 8, 1990, the Defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The Defendant was present and was represented by Peter Steele, of the Montana Defender Project. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the Defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it if such is possible. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

After careful consideration, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence imposed shall be affirmed.

The reason for the decision is based upon the presumption of the correctness of the sentencing judge.
Exhibit (99)(b)


CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
(AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


I, David H. Taylor, as Chief Financial Officer of Guilford Mills, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my knowledge:

(1)  the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal
     year ended September 29, 2002 (the "Report"), filed with the U.S.
     Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
     and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  January 14, 2003


/s/ David H. Taylor
------------------------------
David H. Taylor
Chief Financial Officer
§ 65.41 Review of State applications. ( a ) *Review criteria.* The Act provides the basis for review and approval or disapproval of state applications. Federal law enforcement assistance may be provided if such assistance is necessary to provide an adequate response to a law enforcement emergency. In determining whether to approve or disapprove an application for assistance under this section, the Attorney General shall consider: ( 1 ) The nature and extent of such emergency throughout a state or in any part of a state;
( 2 ) The situation or extraordinary circumstances which produced such emergency;
( 3 ) The availability of state and local criminal justice resources to resolve the problem;
( 4 ) The cost associated with the increased Federal presence;
( 5 ) The need to avoid unnecessary Federal involvement and intervention in matters primarily of state and local concern; and,
( 6 ) Any assistance which the state or other appropriate unit of government has received, or could receive, under any provision of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968.
( b ) *Review process.* ( 1 ) The Attorney General shall consult with the Assistant Attorney General, Office of Justice Programs, and the Director, Bureau of Justice Assistance, on requests for grant assistance.
( 2 ) All requests for assistance of the Federal law enforcement community (e.g., equipment, training, information, or personnel) shall be reviewed by the Attorney General in consultation with appropriate members of the Federal law enforcement community, including the United States Attorney(s) in the affected District(s). Such requests will be subject to statutory restrictions, including section 609O on Federal agency activities.
( 3 ) The Attorney General will approve or disapprove each application, submitted in accordance with these regulations, no later than ten (10) days after receipt.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-30266

Summary Calendar

GEORGE JARRETT,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

LINDA PERKINS, Inmate Records Administrator at Dixon Correctional 

Institute, also known as Evelyn Perkins; WILLIAM ROSS, Supervisor at 

Division of Probation and Parole,

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:17-CV-1775

Before CLEMENT, ELROD, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

George Jarrett, whose Louisiana prisoner # is 339218, appeals the 

dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint and state law breach of 

contract claim. The district dismissed the § 1983 claim as barred by the 

Louisiana statute of limitations. Also, it declined to exercise jurisdiction over, 

and dismissed, the breach of contract claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3).

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 26, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-30266 Document: 00515468528 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/26/2020
No. 19-30266

2

Jarrett’s brief argues the merits of his claims but does not challenge the district 

court’s time bar ruling or its decision not to exercise supplemental jurisdiction 

over the contract claim. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 

1993). Thus, Jarrett has waived any challenge to the district court’s dispositive 

ruling. See Brinkmann v. Dallas Cty. Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 

(5th Cir. 1987). We dismiss the appeal as frivolous. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

 Case: 19-30266 Document: 00515468528 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/26/2020
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 23, 2013

d1216

Order 

Clerk

December 23, 2013

147182-3

BARRY MOON and LORI MOON,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 147182

COA: 308529

Ingham CC: 11-000215-CH

OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

BARRY MOON and LORI MOON,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 147183

COA: 311330

Ingham CC: 12-000009-CH

FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 18, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit







December 23, 2015




Ms. Kirsty Ward
Senior Director Walmart Services
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 
702 S.W. 8th Street 
Bentonville, AR 72716 


Dear Kirsty:


MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc. (“MoneyGram”) and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Walmart”) are parties to that certain Master Trust Agreement effective April 1, 2013, as amended (the “Agreement”).  Pursuant to Section 9(a) of the Agreement, upon the provision of at least one hundred eighty (180) days’ notice by either party, the Agreement could terminate upon the expiration of the Initial Term on March 31, 2016.  On September 30, 2015 the parties entered into a letter agreement extending the Initial Term of the Agreement until June 30, 2016 and setting the notice of termination date as January 2, 2016. 


The parties have been discussing the continued provision of MoneyGram’s products and services to be offered in Walmart stores. To date, neither party has given notice of its intent to terminate the Agreement upon the expiration of the Initial Term. Based upon the rapidly approaching 180-day deadline for providing termination notice, upon Walmart’s countersigning of this letter, both parties hereby agree to amend Section 9(a) of the Agreement to reduce the period in which a party must provide notice of its election to terminate the Agreement from one hundred eighty (180) days prior to the expiration of the Initial Term to one hundred fifty (150) days prior to the expiration of the Initial Term.  Given the agreed upon modification of the notice period, the parties recognize and agree that the notice of termination date will now be February 1, 2016. 


This letter agreement and/or any actions taken in connection with this letter agreement are not intended to, and shall not, create or give rise to any obligation on the part of either MoneyGram or Walmart to: (i) enter into or execute any new contract; (ii) renew or extend the Agreement; (iii) discuss or continue to discuss or negotiate any new agreement or a renewal or extension of the Agreement; or (iv) pursue or enter into any agreement or contractual relationship with the other party. Except as expressly set forth in this letter agreement, nothing in this letter agreement shall amend or modify any term, condition or provision of the Agreement or waive any right or obligation of any party under the Agreement or under applicable law. 


If you have any questions, please contact me at (214) 999-7570 or Nick Flint at (470) 271-6525.


We look forward to talking with you further.


With kind regards,
	
		
	MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc.

	By:
	/s/ Juan Agualimpia



	 
	Juan Agualimpia



	 
	EVP Business Development & CMO








Agreed and Acknowledged:
	
		
	Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

	By:
	/s/ Kirsty Ward

	 
	Kirsty Ward



	 
	Senior Director Walmart Services
FROM: THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, COUNTY OF MISSOULA.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. FORTINO VALENCIA Defendant.

NO. 8684 DECISION

On July 14,1989 the Defendant was sentenced to five (5) years for Count I, Criminal Possession of Dangerous Drugs; and Twenty (20) years with five (5) years suspended for Count II for Criminal Possession of Dangerous Drugs with Intent to Sell. If the defendant returns *34to the United States during this period of probation he will be held in violation of probation. The sentences shall be served consecutively and he shall be given 131 days credit for time served; dangerous designation.

DATED this 3rd day of August, 1990.

On August 3, 1990, the Defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The Defendant was present and was represented by Joylyn Smith of the Montana Defender Project. The state was not represented.

Mr. Valencia is an Immigrant from Mexico and is unable to speak English. Therefore, Father Henry Cabong, pastor at the Montana State Prison, was present to act as interpreter during the hearing.

Before hearing the application, the Defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it if such is possible. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

After careful consideration, there was a split decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

The reason for the decision is based upon the presumption of the validity of the District Court Judgment.

DISSENT:

The Honorable Robert Boyd

dissents. He would have amended the sentence to change the status designation from Dangerous to Non- dangerous. This would have conformed with the recommendation in the pre-sentence report.
#### § 345.31 Recruitment.

Inmate workers for FPI locations may be recruited through admission and orientation lectures or through direct recruiting.
#### § 22.29 Sanctions.

Where BJA, OJJDP, BJS, NIJ, or OJP believes that a violation of section 812(a) of the Act or section 1407(d) of the Victims of Crime Act, these regulations, or any grant or contract conditions entered into thereunder has occurred, it may initiate administrative actions leading to termination of a grant or contract, commence appropriate personnel and/or other procedures in cases involving Federal employees, and/or initiate appropriate legal actions leading to imposition of a civil penalty not to exceed $10,000 for a violation occurring before September 29, 1999, and not to exceed $11,000 for a violation occurring on or after September 29, 1999 against any person responsible for such violations. For civil penalties assessed after August 1, 2016, whose associated violations occurred after November 2, 2015, see the civil penalty amount as provided in 28 CFR 85.5.

[Order No. 2249-99, 64 FR 47102, Aug. 30, 1999, as amended by AG Order 3690-2016, 81 FR 42499, June 30, 2016]
### §404c–10. Notice of assumption of police jurisdiction by United States; acceptance by Secretary of further cessions

The Secretary of the Interior shall notify in writing the Governor of the Commonwealth of Kentucky of the passage and approval of this Act, and of the fact that the United States assumes police jurisdiction over the park. Upon the acceptance by the Secretary of the Interior of further cessions of jurisdiction over lands now or hereafter included in the Mammoth Cave National Park, the provisions of sections 2 to 9 inclusive, shall apply to such lands.

(June 5, 1942, ch. 341, §10, 56 Stat. 319.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is act June 5, 1942, which is classified to sections 404c–1 to 404c–12 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

Sections 2 to 9 inclusive, referred to in text, means sections 2 to 9 of act June 5, 1942, only sections 2 to 4 of which are still in effect and are classified to sections 404c–2 to 404c–4 of this title.
MONTEREY BAY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT

RULE 212. PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF EMISSION DATA

(Adopted 9

- 1

- 74; Revised 12

- 13

- 84)

1. In accordance with provisions of the Government Code Section 6254.7, all information, analyses, plans or specifications that disclose the nature, extent, quantity, or degree of air contaminants or other pollution which any article, machine, equi pment, or other contrivance will produce which the District requires any applicant to provide before such applicant builds, erects, alters, replaces, operates, sells, rents, or uses such article, machine, equipment or other contrivance, are public records.

2. All air or other pollution monitoring data, including data compiled from stationary sources are public records.

3. Except as otherwise provided in part 4. below, trade secrets are not public records under the regulation. Trade secrets a s used in these rules and regulations, may include, but are not limited to, any formula, plan, pattern, process, tool, mechanism, compound, procedure, production data, or compilation of information which is not patented, which is known only to cer tain individuals within a commercial concern who are using it to fabricate, produce, or compound an article of trade or a service having commercial value and which gives its user an opportunity to obtain a business advantage over competitors

wh o do not know or use it. The owner or operator shall state in writing his justification for claiming material as trade secrets and such justification shall be public record.

The Air Pollution Control Officer shall rule on the validity of trade secret claims within 15 days after receipt of the request. In cases of rejection, the Air Pollution Control Officer shall promptly notify the person making the justification, in writing, that the records in question shall, within 21 days be subject to public inspection unless a justification is received and accepted.

4. Notwithstanding any other provisions of the law, all air pollution emission data, including

these e mission data which constitute trade secrets as defined in part 3. above are public

records. Data used to calculate emission data are not emissions data for purposes of this

rule and data which constitute trade secrets and which are used to calcul ate emission data are not public records.

5. Upon request, any specific public records in the possession of the District will be made available to the public within 15 days. If, for good cause, the information cannot be made

available within the 15 days, the Air Pollution Control Officer shall notify the requesting person of the reason for the delay and when the information will be available. Requests from the public for records shall be in writing, shall be specific and in sufficient detai l to enable the District to readily iden tify the information requested.

* * * * *
§ 36.405 Alterations: Historic preservation. ( a ) Alterations to buildings or facilities that are eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places under the National Historic Preservation Act, 16 U.S.C. 470 *et seq.,* or are designated as historic under State or local law, shall comply to the maximum extent feasible with this part.
( b ) If it is determined that it is not feasible to provide physical access to an historic property that is a place of public accommodation in a manner that will not threaten or destroy the historic significance of the building or the facility, alternative methods of access shall be provided pursuant to the requirements of subpart C of this part.
[AG Order No. 3181-2010, 75 FR 56256, Sept. 15, 2010]
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Private  Access,  Inc., on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the  undersigned,  B.
Stephen Bailey,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge  and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.