alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 51.48 Decision after reconsideration. ( a ) It is the practice of the Attorney General to notify the submitting authority of the decision to continue or withdraw an objection within a 60-day period following receipt of a reconsideration request or following notice given under § 51.46(b), except that this 60-day period shall be recommenced upon receipt of any documents or written information from the submitting authority that materially supplements the reconsideration review, irrespective of whether the submitting authority provides the documents or information at its own instance or pursuant to a request (written or oral) by the Attorney General. The 60-day reconsideration period may be extended to allow a 15-day decision period following a conference held pursuant to § 51.47. The 60-day reconsideration period shall be computed in the manner specified in § 51.9. Where the reconsideration is at the instance of the Attorney General, the first day of the period shall be the day after the notice required by § 51.46(b) is transmitted to the submitting authority. The reasons for the reconsideration decision shall be stated.
( b ) The objection shall be withdrawn if the Attorney General is satisfied that the change neither has the purpose nor will have the effect of denying or abridging the right to vote on account of race, color, or membership in a language minority group.
( c ) If the objection is not withdrawn, the submitting authority shall be advised that notwithstanding the objection it may institute an action in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia for a declaratory judgment that the change objected to by the Attorney General neither has the purpose nor will have the effect of denying or abridging the right to vote on account of race, color, or membership in a language minority group.
( d ) An objection remains in effect until either it is specifically withdrawn by the Attorney General or a declaratory judgment with respect to the change in question is entered by the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
( e ) A copy of the notification shall be sent to any party who has commented on the submission or reconsideration or has requested notice of the Attorney General's action thereon.
( f ) Notice of the decision after reconsideration will be given to interested parties registered under § 51.32.
[52 FR 490, Jan. 6, 1987, as amended by Order No. 3262-2011, 76 FR 21248, Apr. 15, 2011]
Help Prevent the

spread of the flu
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 92863 / September 2, 2021

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension of 

trading in the securities of NVCN Corporation (NVCP) commencing at 9:30 a.m. EDT 

on September 3, 2021, and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EDT on September 17, 2021.

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of the foregoing 

company due to a lack of current and accurate information about the company because it 

has not filed certain periodic reports with the Commission. This order was entered 

pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act). 

The Commission cautions brokers, dealers, shareholders, and prospective purchasers that 

they should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently 

available information and any information subsequently issued by this company. 

Brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15c2-

11, at the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered relating to 

the securities of the subject company unless and until the broker or dealer has strictly 

complied with all of the provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to 

what is required by the rule, it should refrain from entering quotations relating to the 

securities of this company that has been subject to the trading suspension until such time 

as it has familiarized itself with the rule and is certain that all of its provisions have been 

met. Any broker or dealer with questions regarding the rule should contact the staff of 

the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, DC at (202) 551-5777. If any 

broker or dealer enters any quotation that is in violation of the rule, the Commission will 

consider the need for prompt enforcement action.

If any broker, dealer or other person has any information that may relate to this matter,

they should immediately contact Elisha L. Frank, Assistant Regional Director, Miami 

Regional Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission at (305) 982-6300, or 

Michael D. Paley, Assistant Regional Director, New York Regional Office of the 

Securities and Exchange Commission at (212) 336-1100.
NOTICE OF EFFECTED SUBSTITUTION

                               DATED APRIL 4, 2003
                 ALLIANZ LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
                      ALLIANZ LIFE VARIABLE ACCOUNT A AND B

Effective April 4, shares of the Dreyfus Stock Index Fund have been substituted
for all shares of the Franklin S&P 500 Index Fund owned through variable
insurance products issued by Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America.
Specifically, Initial Class shares of the Dreyfus Stock Index Fund were
substituted for Class 1 shares of the Franklin S&P 500 Index Fund, and Service
Class shares of the Dreyfus Stock Index Fund were substituted for Class 2 shares
of the Franklin S&P 500 Index Fund. There was no fee charged for the
substitution. In addition, the substitution will not count toward any limit on
free transfers. Enclosed is a confirmation of the substitution of the shares of
the Franklin S&P 500 Index Fund with those of the Dreyfus Stock Index Fund.

If you wish, for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the Substitution,
you can make one transfer of Contract value attributable to the Franklin S&P 500
Index Fund out of the Dreyfus Fund and into any other Investment Option(s)
available under your contract, without any limitation or charge on transfers as
described in the Contract's prospectus, if you have not already exercised your
one-time right of free transfer. If you choose, you can divide the applicable
Account Value, transferring part to one Investment Option and part to other
Investment Options, subject to any Contract limitations on minimum investment in
a particular Investment Option. This transfer will not count as one of the
limited number of transfers permitted in a year free of charge, and Allianz Life
Insurance Company of North America will not impose any additional transfer
restrictions on this transfer.

Attached to this notice is a transfer form. Please fill out the form if you
would like to make a transfer from the Dreyfus Fund, and mail it to the Company
at the address on the form. If you have already exercised your free transfer,
any transfer you make will count toward any limitations on free transfers.

We have enclosed with this Notice summary information regarding the Investment
Options available under your contract. You should already have received a
current prospectus for the Dreyfus Stock Index Fund. However, if you have not
already been sent a current prospectus, a current prospectus for the Dreyfus
Fund is attached. You can obtain copies of the prospectus for the Dreyfus Fund,
or for any of the other Investment Options available under your Contract, free
of charge, by calling our Service Center toll-free at (800) 624-0197.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00172

- CR

ABRAHAM JACOB PROENZA

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS
On Appeal from the 404th District Court of Cameron County , Texas Trial Cause No. 10

- CR

- 727

- G

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered thi s cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and
remanded . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED AND REMANDED for proceedings consistent with this opinion

. We further order this decision certifie d below for observance. July 23 , 2015
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 91438 / March 29, 2021

INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940

Release No. 5709 / March 29, 2021

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-18422

In the Matter of 

JOSHUA D. MOSSHART

NOTICE THAT INITIAL DECISION HAS BECOME FINAL

The time for filing a petition for review of the initial decision in this proceeding has 

expired. No such petition has been filed by Joshua D. Mosshart or the Division of Enforcement, 

and the Commission has not chosen to review the decision on its own initiative.

Accordingly, notice is hereby given, pursuant to Rule 360(d) of the Commission's Rules 

of Practice,1that the initial decision of the administrative law judge has become the final 

decision of the Commission with respect to Joshua D. Mosshart.

2 The orders contained in that 

decision are hereby declared effective. The initial decision ordered that: (a) pursuant to Sections 

15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 203(f) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, 

Joshua D. Mosshart is suspended for twelve months from associating with any broker, dealer, 

investment adviser, municipal securities dealer, municipal advisor, transfer agent, or nationally 

recognized statistical rating organization; and (b) pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Securities 

Exchange Act of 1934, Joshua D. Mosshart is suspended for twelve months from participating in 

an offering of penny stock, including acting as a promoter, finder, consultant, agent, or other 

person who engages in activities with a broker, dealer, or issuer for purposes of the issuance or

trading in any penny stock, or inducing or attempting to induce the purchase or sale of any penny 

stock. 

For the Commission, by the Office of the General Counsel, pursuant to delegated 

authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

 Secretary

 

1

 17 C.F.R. § 201.360(d).

2

 Joshua D. Mosshart, Initial Decision Release No. 1408, 2021 WL 517422 (Feb. 11, 2021).
CAMPAÑA NACIONAL PARA PREVENIR EL CONSUMO DEL 

ALCOHOL ENTRE MENORES DE EDAD 

FORMULARIO DE ACUERDO FAMILIAR: EVITANDO EL ALCOHOL 

Este acuerdo establece que: 

Como tu mamá/papá/cuidador, yo prometo 

hacer mi parte para evitar que tomes alcohol. 

Prometo que te voy a hablar de los peligros y 

efectos dañinos de tomar alcohol entre los 

menores de edad. Prometo crear un ambiente 

libre de alcohol que sea divertido y seguro para 

ti y tus amigos. También prometo ir a buscarte a 

cualquier hora y lugar si te encuentras en una 

situación incómoda en la que menores de edad 

hayan tomado alcohol. 

Al firmar este contrato, yo estoy de acuerdo en 

que voy a tener conversaciones constructivas 

contigo sobre los peligros de tomar alcohol 

entre menores de edad. 

Como tu hijo/hija, yo entiendo que tomar alcohol 

puede dañar mi cuerpo y mi mente y puede 

hacerme decir y hacer cosas de las que podría 

arrepentirme luego. Prometo evitar situaciones en 

las que mis amigos y compañeros menores de 

edad estén tomando. También prometo que si 

pasara alguna situación en la que menores de 

edad estén tomando, yo voy a llamarte o enviarte 

un mensaje de texto para que me ayudes a salir 

de esa situación. 

Al firmar este contrato, yo estoy de acuerdo en 

que no voy a tomar alcohol mientras sea menor 

de edad.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 5, 2020

No. 04-19-00268-CR

Stacy James SPENCER,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR2340

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On February 19, 2020, we issued a memorandum opinion and judgment in this appeal, 

affirming the trial court’s judgment. We issued the mandate on July 10, 2020. On October 5, 

2020, appellant, representing himself, filed a “Motion: Appellant[’]s Speedy Acquittal.” This 

court’s plenary power in this appeal has expired, and this court no longer has jurisdiction. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 19.1 (specifying the period of plenary power); id. R. 19.3 (“After its plenary 

power expires, the court cannot vacate or modify its judgment.”).

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of October, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 1997
ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED APRIL 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                          14,575
<SECURITIES>                                    19,100
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,078
<ALLOWANCES>                                       249
<INVENTORY>                                     11,798
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,718
<PP&E>                                          70,945
<DEPRECIATION>                                  42,141
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 105,580
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,386
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,623
<OTHER-SE>                                      75,666
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   105,580
<SALES>                                        121,480
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               121,480
<CGS>                                           62,342
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   62,342
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,080
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,585
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,495
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.10
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0257

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

RICHARD LEE TOME,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 27, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Laurie McKinnon

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 4 2020

06/04/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0257
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           9,701
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,258
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,686
<INVENTORY>                                     70,357
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               138,674
<PP&E>                                         195,623
<DEPRECIATION>                                 112,418
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 316,464
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,838
<BONDS>                                        142,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,611
<OTHER-SE>                                      80,995
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   316,464
<SALES>                                        407,107
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               407,107
<CGS>                                          293,572
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  293,572
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,052
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,682
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 58,973
<INCOME-TAX>                                    25,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,773
<DISCONTINUED>                                (14,515)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,889)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,369
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.19


</TABLE>
!
	"##"

$%"

%

	




&

'(
)("'*
"


&


	 !	

+ !

&
 ,  (
 , 
 
!
	" ##  (&
,-  *(
!


-.




/00*(
!
-
(
&-+123

(&
,
&(


(% &

 
*!!


 & 


4
 ,! 

 
4
 *&

 
!*
- 4(

	5,*		-



&	
6*
&!

	-"5
3'-(-"7

8' 0+9982

:="7?8>83

$ 
!&0
")

2#-%)5-

7
4
!"7:383

@@89>92

*
	,$%

Case 15-13150-KHK Doc 83 Filed 01/19/18 Entered 01/19/18 14:23:58 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

+&
*!-=*&4


,



A
A:=6

:="7?8>83

$
!&0
")

2#-%)5-

7
4
!"7:383

*
	,$%



 A
A  '(
)   (  "-:="5
;

*
-

'(
)(

B

48

:	;&
"7:338

'*


0' :'0

'*&

4&!
,

,4
4/&
4	
,,(-


&
!	

,(&6*
&-:&(


%/&3&(&
,
!

"&&


"

&	

%(&

A
A:=

:=

$
!&0
")

*
	,$%

Jan 19 2018 /s/ Klinette H. Kindred

EOD: Jan 19 2018

Case 15-13150-KHK Doc 83 Filed 01/19/18 Entered 01/19/18 14:23:58 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3

,
!,0&
(

',4
4/&5
&
&-		!

-

*
*#!	*	933

CD

A
A:=

:=

$
!&0
")


	


:=

$
!&0
")

2#-%)5-

7
4
!"7:383

: 



9@@

&4&"?3

 
,;"7:33

'(
)("'*


B

48

:	;&
"7:338

	




39>-	%$#

B&
&4"7:339

Case 15-13150-KHK Doc 83 Filed 01/19/18 Entered 01/19/18 14:23:58 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3
FILED

November 19, 1997

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

MIDDLE SECTION AT NASHVILLE

GARY W. PHELPS, )

)

Plaintiff/Appellant, )

) Davidson Chancery

) No. 95-1892-III

VS. )

) Appeal No.

) 01A01-9603-CH-00103

TENNESSEE BOARD OF PAROLES, )

ET AL., )

)

Defendants/Appellees. )

O R D E R

The Tennessee Board of Paroles has filed a petition for rehearing pointing out

that this court’s October 22, 1997 opinion relies upon outdated regulations. We have

determined that the motion is well-taken.

It is, therefore, ordered that this court’s opinion filed on October 22, 1997 be

and is hereby withdrawn and replaced with the opinion filed contemporaneously with

this order.

ENTER, this ______ day of November, 1997.

_________________________________

HENRYF.TODD,PRESIDINGJUDGE

MIDDLE SECTION

_________________________________

SAMUEL L. LEWIS, JUDGE 

_________________________________

WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsInitial Evaluation of Acoustic Emission SHM of PRSEUS Multi-bay Box TestsA series of tests of the Pultruded Rod Stitched Efficient Unitized Structure (PRSEUS) HWB Multi-Bay Test Article were conducted during the second quarter of 2015 at NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC) in the Combined Loads Test facility (COLTS). This report documents the Acoustic Emission (AE) data collected during those tests along with an initial analysis of the data. A more detailed analysis will be presented in future publications.Document ID20160010613Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHorne, Michael R.*(National Inst. of Aerospace Hampton, VA, United States)*Madaras, Eric I.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredAugust 29, 2016Publication DateAugust 1, 2016Subject CategoryAircraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNF1676L-23036L-20731NASA/TM-2016-218976Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 338881.02.22.07.01.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20160010613.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §430c. Permits to occupy land

Upon such terms and conditions as he may prescribe, the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to permit any person occupying any land within the boundaries of such park to continue to occupy such land, but the Secretary may revoke such permit at any time.

(Mar. 3, 1931, ch. 437, §4, 46 Stat. 1508; Ex. Ord. No. 6166, §2, June 10, 1933; Ex. Ord. No. 6228, §1, July 28, 1933.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Transfer of administrative functions of park, see note set out under section 430a of this title.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 16

- 00473

- CR Miranda HERRERA , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014CR6351 Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice Delivered and Filed: September 21, 2016
DISMISSED Miranda Herrera and the State entered into a plea bargain under which Herrera pled guilty to attempted capital murder. The trial court imposed sentence in accordance with the agreement and signed a certificate stating this “is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). Herrera timely filed a notice of appeal. The clerk’s record, which includes the trial court’s rule 25.2(a)(2) certification and a written plea bargain agreement, has been filed. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d).04

- 16

- 00473

- CR

- 2

- The court gave Herrera notice that this appeal would be dismissed unless an amended trial court certification showing s he has the right to appeal were made part of the appellate record by August 30, 2016

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; Daniels v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

— San Ant onio 2003, order), disp. on merits , No. 04

- 03

- 00176

- CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003, pet. ref’d) (not designated for publication). No amended certification has been made part of the record. We therefore dismiss this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d). 1
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH

1 The clerk’s record establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record also support s the trial court’s certification that Herrera does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review clerk’s record to determine whether trial court’s certification is accurate).