alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 144 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 144

Designating May 5, 2019, as the ``National Day of Awareness for Missing 
                 and Murdered Native Women and Girls''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 4, 2019

   Mr. Daines (for himself, Mr. Tester, Mr. Hoeven, Mr. Rounds, Ms. 
   Warren, Mr. Gardner, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Lankford, and Ms. Murkowski) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                            on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Designating May 5, 2019, as the ``National Day of Awareness for Missing 
                 and Murdered Native Women and Girls''.

Whereas, according to a study commissioned by the Department of Justice, in some 
        Tribal communities, American Indian women face murder rates that are 
        more than 10 times the national average murder rate;
Whereas, according to the most recently available data from the Centers for 
        Disease Control and Prevention, in 2017, homicide was the sixth leading 
        cause of death for American Indian and Alaska Native females between 1 
        and 44 years of age;
Whereas little data exist on the number of missing American Indian and Alaska 
        Native women in the United States;
Whereas, on July 5, 2013, Hanna Harris, a member of the Northern Cheyenne Tribe, 
        was reported missing by her family in Lame Deer, Montana;
Whereas the body of Hanna Harris was found 5 days after she went missing;
Whereas Hanna Harris was determined to have been raped and murdered, and the 
        individuals accused of committing those crimes were convicted;
Whereas the case of Hanna Harris is an example of many similar cases; and
Whereas Hanna Harris was born on May 5, 1992: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates May 5, 2019, as the ``National Day of 
        Awareness for Missing and Murdered Native Women and Girls''; 
        and
            (2) calls on the people of the United States and interested 
        groups--
                    (A) to commemorate the lives of missing and 
                murdered American Indian and Alaska Native women whose 
                cases are documented and undocumented in public records 
                and the media; and
                    (B) to demonstrate solidarity with the families of 
                victims in light of those tragedies.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Daniel J. Adley against Wickwire Spencer Steel Company et al. Charles Allen, Jr., et al., Doing Business under the Name of Allen & Company.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.
#### § 1300.30 General.

Subject to the provisions of this subpart, the requirements of 2 CFR parts 200 and 1201 govern the implementation and management of State highway safety programs and projects carried out under 23 U.S.C. Chapter 4 and Section 1906.
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  OF UNITED SURGICAL PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL, INC.  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

In
connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2003 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mark A. Kopser, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of United Surgical Partners International, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that:



| |  | /s/ Mark A. KopserMark A. Kopser
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
May 14, 2003 |  | 
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

QuickLinks
FIGHT FLU

Get your family vaccinated against flu this season. It’s the best 

way to protect you and your loved ones from getting the flu.

www.cdc.gov/fightflu
### §7031. Principles governing the use of electronic signatures in international transactions

#### (a) Promotion of electronic signatures

#### (1) Required actions

The Secretary of Commerce shall promote the acceptance and use, on an international basis, of electronic signatures in accordance with the principles specified in paragraph (2) and in a manner consistent with section 7001 of this title. The Secretary of Commerce shall take all actions necessary in a manner consistent with such principles to eliminate or reduce, to the maximum extent possible, the impediments to commerce in electronic signatures, for the purpose of facilitating the development of interstate and foreign commerce.

#### (2) Principles

The principles specified in this paragraph are the following:

(A) Remove paper-based obstacles to electronic transactions by adopting relevant principles from the Model Law on Electronic Commerce adopted in 1996 by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law.

(B) Permit parties to a transaction to determine the appropriate authentication technologies and implementation models for their transactions, with assurance that those technologies and implementation models will be recognized and enforced.

(C) Permit parties to a transaction to have the opportunity to prove in court or other proceedings that their authentication approaches and their transactions are valid.

(D) Take a nondiscriminatory approach to electronic signatures and authentication methods from other jurisdictions.

#### (b) Consultation

In conducting the activities required by this section, the Secretary shall consult with users and providers of electronic signature products and services and other interested persons.

#### (c) Definitions

As used in this section, the terms "electronic record" and "electronic signature" have the same meanings provided in section 7006 of this title.

(Pub. L. 106–229, title III, §301, June 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 475.)
#### § 156.7 Service of application.

After an application has been accepted for filing, the Secretary will cause a copy thereof to be served upon the natural gas company (respondent) against which an order pursuant to section 7(a) of the Natural Gas Act has been requested. The natural gas company shall, within 30 days after the date of service of such application file its answer (an original and 7 conformed copies) to such application in which it shall state whether it has any objection to the grant of the application. If the natural gas company objects to the grant of the relief sought by the application, it shall fully state the grounds and reasons for its objections. The answer shall be verified and shall be signed by an executive of the natural gas company. In the event that the respondent natural gas company fails to file a timely response to the application it shall be deemed to have agreed to the grant thereof.

[Order 302, 30 FR 9302, July 27, 1965, as amended by Order 225, 47 FR 19057, May 3, 1982]
#### § 71.45 Deposit in Treasury of the United States.

All amounts collected pursuant to this part shall be deposited as miscellaneous receipts in the Treasury of the United States, except as provided in 31 U.S.C. 3806(g).
### §450pp–3. Authorization of appropriations

There are hereby authorized to be appropriated not more than $146,000 for the acquisition of lands and interests in land and not more than $1,862,000 for the development of the Roger Williams National Memorial, as provided in sections 450pp to 450pp–3 of this title.

(Pub. L. 89–293, §4, Oct. 22, 1965, 79 Stat. 1070; Pub. L. 96–607, title I, §101, Dec. 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 3539.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1980—Pub. L. 96–607 substituted "$146,000 for the acquisition of lands and interests in land and not more than $1,862,000" for "$700,000 for the acquisition of lands and interests in land and".
§ 551.50 Policy. ( a ) An inmate may contribute to a candidate for election to a federal, state or local office, in a primary, general, or special election.
( b ) An inmate may contribute to any international, national or local organization, including political parties, so long as the contribution does not violate any law or regulation.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 17-3411

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Patricia Gayle Lewis-Zubkin, also known as Pat Watts, also known as Pat Zubkin,

also known as Pat Lewis

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Arkansas - Harrison

____________

Submitted: September 25, 2018

Filed: November 6, 2018

[Published]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, KELLY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Patricia Gayle Lewis-Zubkin pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute

methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. She appeals the
district court’s1

imposition of a two-level sentencing enhancement under USSG

§ 2D1.1(b)(2), which applies if the defendant “used violence, made a credible threat

to use violence, or directed the use of violence.” 

In several intercepted phone calls, Lewis-Zubkin stated that two of her coconspirators, James Suggs and Dammon Charlton, were working with law

enforcement and needed to be assaulted. At one point she said that Suggs should

have the life beat out of him and that she would like to see Charlton at least get his

front teeth knocked out. She later paid another co-conspirator $100 to carry out the

assaults. When days passed without the attacks taking place, Lewis-Zubkin

demanded the return of her $100 and said she had found someone else to do the job.

At sentencing, Lewis-Zubkin did not contest any of these facts but argued they were

insufficient to show her threats were credible.

We find no clear error in the district court’s application of the § 2D1.1(b)(2)

enhancement. See United States v. Kirk Tang Yuk, 885 F.3d 57, 82–83 (2d Cir.

2018) (concluding it was not clear error for the district court to construe defendant’s

comments that referenced “driving a car over” another individual as credible threats,

even if “the statements in question could be interpreted as innocent hyperbole”);

United States v. Rutherford, 599 F.3d 817, 820 (8th Cir. 2010) (standard of review).

The district court correctly noted that the enhancement applies regardless of whether

the threatened violence is ultimately carried out. Cf. United States v. Sykes, 854 F.3d

457, 461 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 346 (2017).

2

1The Honorable P.K. Holmes, III, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the Western District of Arkansas.

2

In a passing remark during sentencing, the district court referred to LewisZubkin as bearing the burden of proof. The district court did not repeat this error and

the uncontested facts establish that the government showed that the enhancement

applied by a preponderance of the evidence. See United States v. Pepper, 747 F.3d

520, 523 (8th Cir. 2014) (burden of proof).

-2-
The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

___________________________

-3-
Exhibit 10.23

 

Description of Director Compensation

Fees.  Directors who are not employees of the Company receive fees of $40,000 annually. All such fees are paid in cash. Directors who are also employees of the Company receive no fees for their service on the Board. All Directors are entitled to reimbursement for their reasonable out-of-pocket travel expenditures. 

Equity Grants.  Pursuant to the Non-Employee Director's Stock Grant Plan, Directors who are not employees of the Company are credited annually with 5,000 shares of the Company's common stock. One quarter of these shares, or 1,250 shares, are credited to a Director's account on the last business day of each calendar quarter. Delivery of the shares credited to a Director is deferred until such Director ceases to serve as a Director. These shares are issued pursuant to the Plan. 

Chairman's Fee.  Mr. Donald P. Aiken serves as Chairman of the Board. In addition to receiving the Director compensation described above, Mr. Aiken receives a fee of $12,500 per month for his services as Chairman.

Deferrals.  Under an amended Agreement for Deferment of Director Fees, each non-employee Director may elect to defer all or part of the Director's annual retainer fees and Board and committee meeting attendance fees until a future date selected by the Director. Until the termination of the Gerber Scientific, Inc. 1992 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan in August 2002, a Director could elect to have the deferral held in cash, on which interest accrues at market rates, or in shares of the common stock issued under that plan.  From the termination of the 1992 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan in August 2002 until January 1, 2006, the Agreement provided that deferred amounts would only be held in cash, on which interest would accrue at a rate equal to the pre-tax equivalent yield on the Company's combined short-term and long-term investment portfolios or, in the absence of such portfolios, at a LIBOR-based rate.  Amendments to the Agreement adopted in December 2005 provide that non-employee directors will have the option, from and after January 1, 2006, to have amounts deferred be held in shares of the common stock issued under the Agreement or in cash, on which interest accrues at a LIBOR-based rate.  The Agreement provides for dividends to be credited on the shares of the common stock held in a Director's share account established in accordance with the Agreement.  The amended Agreement provides that a total of 100,000 shares of common stock may be issued pursuant to the Agreement.
### §1212. Investigation and control of crown of thorns starfish

In carrying out the purposes of this chapter, the Secretary of Commerce and the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution are authorized to—

(1) conduct such studies, research, and investigations, as they deem desirable to determine the causes of the population increase of the "Crown of Thorns", their effects on corals and coral reefs, and the stability and regeneration of reefs following predation;

(2) to monitor areas where the "Crown of Thorns" may be increasing in numbers and to determine future needs for control;

(3) to develop improved methods of control and to carry out programs of control in areas where these are deemed necessary; and

(4) to take such other actions as deemed desirable to gain an understanding of the ecology and control of the seastar "Crown of Thorns".

(Pub. L. 91–427, §2, Sept. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 884; 1970 Reorg. Plan No. 4, eff. Oct. 3, 1970, 35 F.R. 15627, 84 Stat. 2090.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Transfer of functions to Secretary of Commerce from Secretary of the Interior by Reorg. Plan No. 4 of 1970, see note set out under section 1211 of this title.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 956 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require the 

disclosure of all donations. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 28, 2019 

Mr. MERKLEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to 

require the disclosure of all donations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Brighter Sunshine on 

5 Donations Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REQUIRING DISCLOSURE OF ALL DONATIONS. 

7 (a) INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURES.—Section 

8 304(c)(2)(C) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 

9 1971 (52 U.S.C. 30104(c)(2)(C)) is amended by striking 

10 ‘‘which was made for the purpose of furthering an indeVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:06 Apr 05, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S956.IS S956

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 956 IS

1 pendent expenditure’’ and inserting ‘‘(without regard to 

2 whether such contribution was made for the purpose of 

3 furthering an independent expenditure)’’. 

4 (b) ELECTIONEERING COMMUNICATIONS.—Section 

5 304(f)(2) of such Act (52 U.S.C. 30104(f)(2)) is amend6 ed— 

7 (1) in the first sentence of subparagraph (E), 

8 by inserting ‘‘(determined without regard to whether 

9 the contributions were made for the purpose of fur10 thering an electioneering communication)’’ after 

11 ‘‘disclosure date’’, and 

12 (2) in subparagraph (F), by inserting ‘‘(deter13 mined without regard to whether the contributions 

14 were made for the purpose of furthering an election15 eering communication)’’ after ‘‘disclosure date’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
### §430u. Donations of land; purchase and condemnation

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to accept donations of land, interests in land, buildings, structures, and other property within the boundaries of said national battlefield park as determined and fixed hereunder, the title and evidence of title to lands purchased to be satisfactory to the Secretary of the Interior: Provided, That under such funds available therefor he may acquire on behalf of the United States by purchase when purchasable at prices deemed by him reasonable, otherwise by condemnation under the provisions of section 3113 of title 40, such tracts of land within the said national battlefield park as may be necessary for the completion thereof.

(June 26, 1935, ch. 315, §2, 49 Stat. 423.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

"Section 3113 of title 40" substituted in text for "the Act of August 1, 1888" on authority of Pub. L. 107–217, §5(c), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1303, the first section of which enacted Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works.
§ 97.12 Employee training. Private prisoner transport companies must require the completion of a minimum of 100 hours of employee training before an employee may transport violent prisoners. Training must include instruction in each of these six areas: ( a ) Use of restraints;
( b ) Searches of prisoners;
( c ) Use of force, including use of appropriate weapons and firearms;
( d ) Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR);
( e ) Map reading; and
( f ) Defensive driving.
#### § 76.42 Limitations.

No action under this part shall be entertained unless commenced within five (5) years from the date on which the violation occurred.
Make a 

statement this
� flu season. 

If you have HIV or AIDS, get a flu shot.
�

If you have HIV or AIDS, you are at risk of serious complications 

from the flu. A flu shot is your best protection against the flu this 

season. You can protect yourself, your family, and those around you 

from getting sick from the flu. 

www.cdc.gov/flu. 

CS226490-A
§ 80.14 Disclosure. ( a ) Any document or other material which is provided to, received by, or prepared in the Department of Justice or any other department or agency of the United States in connection with a request by an issuer or domestic concern under the foregoing procedure shall be exempt from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552 and shall not, except with the consent of the issuer or domestic concern, be made publicly available, regardless of whether the Attorney General responds to such a request or the issuer or domestic concern withdraws such request before receiving a response.
( b ) Nothing contained in paragraph (a) of this section shall limit the Department of Justice's right to issue, at its discretion, a release describing the identity of the requesting issuer or domestic concern, the identity of the foreign country in which the proposed conduct is to take place, the general nature and circumstances of the proposed conduct, and the action taken by the Department of Justice in response to the FCPA Opinion request. Such release shall not disclose either the identity of any foreign sales agents or other types of identifying information. The Department of Justice shall index such releases and place them in a file available to the public upon request.
( c ) A requestor may request that the release not disclose proprietary information.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS RULINGS

Release No. 6846/April 27, 2022

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-20531

In the Matter of :

:

HORTER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC, : ORDER

and DREW K. HORTER :

The Securities and Exchange Commission instituted this proceeding with an Order 

Instituting Proceedings (OIP), pursuant to Sections 203(e), 203(f), and 203(k) of the Investment 

Advisers Act of 1940, on September 8, 2021, and the Commission ordered that the matter be heard 

by an Administrative Law Judge on April 14, 2022. On April 26, 2022, the parties filed a proposed 

schedule, culminating in a hearing date of October 24, 2022. It will be helpful to hold a telephonic 

prehearing conference in the near future to discuss various details of the way forward, such as the 

estimated length of the hearing, arrangements for video conferencing the hearing, any need for inperson hearing sessions, and the presently estimated number and availability of witnesses. The 

parties should propose, by May 6, 2022, dates and times during May when they will be available for 

the prehearing conference.

Going forward, the parties are requested to send a courtesy copy of their filings to 

ALJ@SEC.GOV. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

/S/ Carol Fox Foelak 

Carol Fox Foelak

Administrative Law Judge
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kim Gregory McKINNEY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-6325.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 25, 2002.

Decided May 8, 2002.

Kim Gregory McKinney, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Lee Edwards, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Kim Gregory McKinney seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *United States v. McKinney,*No. CR-00-42; CA-01-297-1 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 14, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*