##### Table of Contents

---

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



---

FORM 10-Q



---

(Mark One)



|x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006

OR



| ̈ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the transition period from  to

000-32743

(Commission File Number)



---

ZHONE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



|                                                              |  |                                       
|------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Delaware                                                      |  | 22-3509099                            
|(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation or organization) |  | (I.R.S. EmployerIdentification Number)
|                                                              | 
|7001 Oakport Street                                           |  |                                       
|Oakland, California                                           |  | 94621                                 
|(Address of principal executive offices)                      |  | (Zip code)                            

(510) 777-7000

(Registrants telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
(1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  x    No ̈

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ̈Accelerated filer  x                Non-accelerated filer ̈

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ̈No  x

As of October 31, 2006, there
were approximately 149,082,679 shares of the registrants common stock outstanding.



---



---

##### Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS



|         |  |                                                                                       |  |     
|-------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----
|         |  |                                                                                       |  | Page
|PART I.  |  | FINANCIAL INFORMATION                                                                 |  |     
|Item 1.  |  | Financial Statements                                                                  |  | 1   
|         |  | Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets                                       |  | 1   
|         |  | Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations                             |  | 2   
|         |  | Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows                             |  | 3   
|         |  | Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements                                  |  | 4   
|Item 2.  |  | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |  | 18  
|Item 3.  |  | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk                            |  | 29  
|Item 4.  |  | Controls and Procedures                                                               |  | 30  
|         |  |                                                                                      
|PART II. |  | OTHER INFORMATION                                                                     |  |     
|Item 1.  |  | Legal Proceedings                                                                     |  | 30  
|Item 1A. |  | Risk Factors                                                                          |  | 32  
|Item 2.  |  | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds                           |  | 32  
|Item 3.  |  | Defaults Upon Senior Securities                                                       |  | 32  
|Item 4.  |  | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders                                   |  | 32  
|Item 5.  |  | Other Information                                                                     |  | 32  
|Item 6.  |  | Exhibits                                                                              |  | 32  
|         |  | Signatures                                                                            |  | 33  



i



---

##### Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION



|Item 1. | Financial Statements
|------- | --------------------

ZHONE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except per share data)



|                                                                                                                                                                          |  |                   |           |   |                  |   |           |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | --------- | - | ---------------- | - | --------- | -
|                                                                                                                                                                          |  | September 30,2006 |           |   | December 31,2005 |  
|Assets                                                                                                                                                                    |  |                   |           |   |                  |   |           |  
|Current assets:                                                                                                                                                           |  |                   |           |   |                  |   |           |  
|Cash and cash equivalents                                                                                                                                                 |  | $                 | 51,314    |   |                  | $ | 52,166    |  
|Short-term investments                                                                                                                                                    |  |                   | 14,489    |   |                  |   | 18,974    |  
|Accounts receivable, net of allowances for sales returns and doubtful accounts of $7,399 in 2006 and $5,643 in 2005                                                       |  |                   | 35,497    |   |                  |   | 35,392    |  
|Inventories                                                                                                                                                               |  |                   | 48,408    |   |                  |   | 48,370    |  
|Prepaid expenses and other current assets                                                                                                                                 |  |                   | 3,464     |   |                  |   | 5,811     |  
|                                                                                                                                                                          |  |                   |           |   |                  |   |           |  
|Total current assets                                                                                                                                                      |  |                   | 153,172   |   |                  |   | 160,713   |  
|Property and equipment, net                                                                                                                                               |  |                   | 24,127    |   |                  |   | 24,097    |  
|Goodwill                                                                                                                                                                  |  |                   | 70,541    |   |                  |   | 180,001   |  
|Other acquisition-related intangible assets, net                                                                                                                          |  |                   |          |   |                  |   | 14,638    |  
|Restricted cash                                                                                                                                                           |  |                   | 547       |   |                  |   | 547       |  
|Other assets                                                                                                                                                              |  |                   | 79        |   |                  |   | 109       |  
|                                                                                                                                                                          |  |                   |           |   |                  |   |           |  
|Total assets                                                                                                                                                              |  | $                 | 248,466   |   |                  | $ | 380,105   |  
|                                                                                                                                                                          |  |                   |           |   |                  |   |           |  
|Liabilities and Stockholders Equity                                                                                                                                      |  |                   |           |   |                  |   |           |  
|Current liabilities:                                                                                                                                                      |  |                   |           |   |                  |   |           |  
|Accounts payable                                                                                                                                                          |  | $                 | 21,048    |   |                  | $ | 17,912    |  
|Line of credit                                                                                                                                                            |  |                   | 14,500    |   |                  |   | 14,500    |  
|Current portion of long-term debt                                                                                                                                         |  |                   | 7,667     |   |                  |   | 1,170     |  
|Accrued and other liabilities                                                                                                                                             |  |                   | 23,380    |   |                  |   | 24,610    |  
|                                                                                                                                                                          |  |                   |           |   |                  |   |           |  
|Total current liabilities                                                                                                                                                 |  |                   | 66,595    |   |                  |   | 58,192    |  
|Long-term debt, less current portion                                                                                                                                      |  |                   | 19,445    |   |                  |   | 28,597    |  
|Other long-term liabilities                                                                                                                                               |  |                   | 1,515     |   |                  |   | 1,527     |  
|                                                                                                                                                                          |  |                   |           |   |                  |   |           |  
|Total liabilities                                                                                                                                                         |  |                   | 87,555    |   |                  |   | 88,316    |  
|                                                                                                                                                                          |  |                   |           |   |                  |   |           |  
|Stockholders equity:                                                                                                                                                     |  |                   |           |   |                  |   |           |  
|Common stock, $0.001 par value. Authorized 900,000 shares; issued and outstanding 149,039 and 147,759 shares as of September 30, 2006 and
December 31, 2005, respectively |  |                   | 149       |   |                  |   | 148       |  
|Additional paid-in capital                                                                                                                                                |  |                   | 1,056,829 |   |                  |   | 1,051,320 |  
|Notes receivable from stockholders                                                                                                                                        |  |                   |          |   |                  |   | (550      | )
|Deferred compensation                                                                                                                                                     |  |                   |          |   |                  |   | (818      | )
|Other comprehensive income (loss)                                                                                                                                         |  |                   | 263       |   |                  |   | (17       | )
|Accumulated deficit                                                                                                                                                       |  |                   | (896,330  | ) |                  |   | (758,294  | )
|                                                                                                                                                                          |  |                   |           |   |                  |   |           |  
|Total stockholders equity                                                                                                                                                |  |                   | 160,911   |   |                  |   | 291,789   |  
|                                                                                                                                                                          |  |                   |           |   |                  |   |           |  
|Total liabilities and stockholders equity                                                                                                                                |  | $                 | 248,466   |   |                  | $ | 380,105   |  
|                                                                                                                                                                          |  |                   |           |   |                  |   |           |  

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.



1



---

##### Table of Contents

ZHONE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands, except per share data)



|                                                                                         |  |                                 |          |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |         |  
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------- | -------- | - | ------------------------------ | - | ------- | ---- |  | - | -------- | - |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                                                         |  | Three Months EndedSeptember 30, |          |   | Nine Months EndedSeptember 30, |  
|                                                                                         |  | 2006                            |          |   | 2005                           |   |         | 2006 |  |   | 2005     |  
|Net revenue                                                                              |  | $                               | 43,138   |   |                                | $ | 40,615  |      |  | $ | 150,038  |   |  | $ | 98,623  |  
|Cost of revenue (1)                                                                      |  |                                 | 28,029   |   |                                |   | 23,846  |      |  |   | 103,380  |   |  |   | 57,086  |  
|                                                                                         |  |                                 |          |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |         |  
|Gross profit                                                                             |  |                                 | 15,109   |   |                                |   | 16,769  |      |  |   | 46,658   |   |  |   | 41,537  |  
|                                                                                         |  |                                 |          |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |         |  
|Operating expenses:                                                                      |  |                                 |          |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |         |  
|Research and product development (1)                                                     |  |                                 | 9,042    |   |                                |   | 7,413   |      |  |   | 27,471   |   |  |   | 18,988  |  
|Sales and marketing (1)                                                                  |  |                                 | 9,308    |   |                                |   | 7,441   |      |  |   | 29,582   |   |  |   | 20,391  |  
|General and administrative (1)                                                           |  |                                 | 3,930    |   |                                |   | 8,067   |      |  |   | 11,068   |   |  |   | 10,975  |  
|Purchased in-process research and development                                            |  |                                 |         |   |                                |   | 1,190   |      |  |   |         |   |  |   | 1,190   |  
|Amortization of intangible assets                                                        |  |                                 | 307      |   |                                |   | 3,214   |      |  |   | 2,764    |   |  |   | 7,728   |  
|Impairment of intangible assets and goodwill                                             |  |                                 | 113,666  |   |                                |   |        |      |  |   | 113,666  |   |  |   |        |  
|                                                                                         |  |                                 |          |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |         |  
|Total operating expenses                                                                 |  |                                 | 136,253  |   |                                |   | 27,325  |      |  |   | 184,551  |   |  |   | 59,272  |  
|                                                                                         |  |                                 |          |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |         |  
|Operating loss                                                                           |  |                                 | (121,144 | ) |                                |   | (10,556 | )    |  |   | (137,893 | ) |  |   | (17,735 | )
|Interest expense                                                                         |  |                                 | (648     | ) |                                |   | (829    | )    |  |   | (1,946   | ) |  |   | (2,512  | )
|Interest income                                                                          |  |                                 | 735      |   |                                |   | 321     |      |  |   | 1,799    |   |  |   | 816     |  
|Other income (expense), net                                                              |  |                                 | 47       |   |                                |   | (110    | )    |  |   | 188      |   |  |   | (176    | )
|                                                                                         |  |                                 |          |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |         |  
|Loss before income taxes                                                                 |  |                                 | (121,010 | ) |                                |   | (11,174 | )    |  |   | (137,852 | ) |  |   | (19,607 | )
|Income tax provision                                                                     |  |                                 | 22       |   |                                |   | 80      |      |  |   | 184      |   |  |   | 133     |  
|                                                                                         |  |                                 |          |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |         |  
|Net loss                                                                                 |  | $                               | (121,032 | ) |                                | $ | (11,254 | )    |  | $ | (138,036 | ) |  | $ | (19,740 | )
|                                                                                         |  |                                 |          |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |         |  
|Basic and diluted net loss per share                                                     |  |                                 | ($0.81   | ) |                                |   | ($0.10  | )    |  |   | ($0.93   | ) |  |   | ($0.20  | )
|Weighted average shares outstanding used to compute basic and diluted net loss per share |  |                                 | 148,905  |   |                                |   | 112,099 |      |  |   | 148,589  |   |  |   | 100,198 |  
|                                                                                         |  |                                 |          |  
|(1)    Amounts include stock-based compensation cost as follows:                         |  |                                 |          |   |                                |   |         |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |         |  
|                                                                                         |  |                                 |          |  
|Cost of revenue                                                                          |  |                                 | 181      |   |                                |   | 22      |      |  |   | 737      |   |  |   | 74      |  
|Research and product development                                                         |  |                                 | 370      |   |                                |   | 52      |      |  |   | 1,299    |   |  |   | 171     |  
|Sales and marketing                                                                      |  |                                 | 310      |   |                                |   | 54      |      |  |   | 1,086    |   |  |   | 156     |  
|General and administrative                                                               |  |                                 | 457      |   |                                |   | 2,617   |      |  |   | 1,103    |   |  |   | 2,651   |  

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.



2



---

##### Table of Contents

ZHONE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)



|                                                                            |  |                                |          |   |      |   |         |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------ | -------- | - | ---- | - | ------- | -
|                                                                            |  | Nine Months EndedSeptember 30, |         
|                                                                            |  | 2006                           |          |   | 2005 |  
|Cash flows from operating activities:                                       |  |                                |          |   |      |   |         |  
|Net loss                                                                    |  | $                              | (138,036 | ) |      | $ | (19,740 | )
|Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |  |                                |          |   |      |   |         |  
|Depreciation and amortization                                               |  |                                | 4,721    |   |      |   | 8,975   |  
|Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets                                |  |                                | 113,666  |   |      |   |        |  
|Stock-based compensation                                                    |  |                                | 4,225    |   |      |   | 3,052   |  
|Provision for sales returns and doubtful accounts                           |  |                                | 5,402    |   |      |   | 1,093   |  
|Purchased in-process research and development                               |  |                                |         |   |      |   | 1,190   |  
|Gain on sale of assets                                                      |  |                                | (289     | ) |      |   | (2,720  | )
|Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions: |  |                                |          |   |      |   |         |  
|Accounts receivable                                                         |  |                                | (5,507   | ) |      |   | (2,950  | )
|Inventories                                                                 |  |                                | (38      | ) |      |   | (6,134  | )
|Prepaid expenses and other current assets                                   |  |                                | 627      |   |      |   | 2,706   |  
|Other assets                                                                |  |                                | 30       |   |      |   | 404     |  
|Accounts payable                                                            |  |                                | 3,136    |   |      |   | 2,780   |  
|Accrued and other liabilities                                               |  |                                | (2,282   | ) |      |   | (10,763 | )
|                                                                            |  |                                |          |   |      |   |         |  
|Net cash used in operating activities                                       |  |                                | (14,345  | ) |      |   | (22,107 | )
|                                                                            |  |                                |          |   |      |   |         |  
|Cash flows from investing activities:                                       |  |                                |          |   |      |   |         |  
|Cash acquired from acquisitions                                             |  |                                |         |   |      |   | 42,838  |  
|Purchases of property and equipment                                         |  |                                | (1,987   | ) |      |   | (1,361  | )
|Purchase of intangible assets                                               |  |                                |         |   |      |   | (1,980  | )
|Proceeds from sale of assets                                                |  |                                | 10,716   |   |      |   |        |  
|Purchases of short-term investments                                         |  |                                | (30,790  | ) |      |   | (24,444 | )
|Proceeds from sale of short-term investments                                |  |                                | 35,287   |   |      |   | 26,371  |  
|                                                                            |  |                                |          |   |      |   |         |  
|Net cash provided by investing activities                                   |  |                                | 13,226   |   |      |   | 41,424  |  
|                                                                            |  |                                |          |   |      |   |         |  
|Cash flows from financing activities:                                       |  |                                |          |   |      |   |         |  
|Proceeds from issuance of common stock                                      |  |                                | 2,104    |   |      |   | 1,936   |  
|Proceeds from repayment of officer loans                                    |  |                                | 550      |   |      |   |        |  
|Repayment of debt                                                           |  |                                | (2,655   | ) |      |   | (3,650  | )
|                                                                            |  |                                |          |   |      |   |         |  
|Net cash used in financing activities                                       |  |                                | (1       | ) |      |   | (1,714  | )
|                                                                            |  |                                |          |   |      |   |         |  
|Effect of exchange rate changes on cash                                     |  |                                | 268      |   |      |   | (23     | )
|                                                                            |  |                                |          |   |      |   |         |  
|Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents                        |  |                                | (852     | ) |      |   | 17,580  |  
|Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                            |  |                                | 52,166   |   |      |   | 46,604  |  
|                                                                            |  |                                |          |   |      |   |         |  
|Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                                  |  | $                              | 51,314   |   |      | $ | 64,184  |  
|                                                                            |  |                                |          |   |      |   |         |  
|Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:                          |  |                                |          |   |      |   |         |  
|Non-cash investing and financing activities:                                |  |                                |          |   |      |   |         |  
|Accrued liabilities converted to note payable                               |  | $                              |         |   |      | $ | 3,800   |  
|                                                                            |  |                                |          |   |      |   |         |  
|Common stock and options issued for acquisition                             |  | $                              |         |   |      | $ | 184,401 |  
|                                                                            |  |                                |          |   |      |   |         |  

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.



3



---

##### Table of Contents

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements



|(1) | Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------



| | (a) | Description of Business
| | --- | -----------------------

Zhone Technologies,
Inc. (sometimes referred to, collectively with its subsidiaries, Zhone or the Company) designs, develops and markets communications network equipment for telephone companies and cable operators worldwide. The Companys
products allow network service providers to deliver video and interactive entertainment services in addition to their existing voice and data service offerings. The Company was incorporated under the laws of the state of Delaware in June 1999. The
Company began operations in September 1999 and is headquartered in Oakland, California.



| | (b) | Basis of Presentation
| | --- | ---------------------

The condensed
consolidated financial statements are unaudited and reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented.
The results of operations for the current interim period are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the current year or any other period. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.



| | (c) | Use of Estimates
| | --- | ----------------

The preparation of the
condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities
and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.



| | (d) | Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
| | --- | ---------------------------------------

On
January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R), which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based
payment awards made to employees and directors, including employee stock options and employee stock purchases under the Companys Employee Stock Purchase Plan based on estimated grant date fair values. SFAS 123R supersedes the Companys
previous accounting under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25). In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB 107)
relating to SFAS 123R. The Company has applied the provisions of SAB 107 in its adoption of SFAS 123R.

The Company adopted SFAS 123R using
the modified prospective transition method, under which prior periods are not restated to reflect, and do not include, the impact of SFAS 123R. SFAS 123R requires companies to estimate the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of
grant using an option pricing model. The Company adopted the Black Scholes model to estimate the fair value of options. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the requisite service
periods in the Companys Consolidated Statement of Operations. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company accounted for stock-based awards to employees and directors using the intrinsic value method in accordance with APB 25 as allowed
under Statement of Financial Accounting



4



---

##### Table of Contents

Standards No. 123, Accounting for StockBased Compensation (SFAS 123), and adopted the pro forma disclosures required under SFAS 123.

Awards of stock options granted to consultants under the Companys share-based compensation plans are accounted for at fair value
determined by using the Black Scholes option pricing model in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or In Conjunction with
Selling, Goods or Services(EITF 96-18). These options are generally immediately exercisable and expire seven to ten years from the date of grant. The Company values non-employee options using the Black Scholes model. Non-employee options
subject to vesting are valued as they become vested.

Fair value stock-based compensation expense under SFAS 123R for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2006 includes compensation expense for share-based payment awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of December 31, 2005 based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the pro-forma
provisions of SFAS 123, and compensation expense for the share-based payment awards granted subsequent to December 31, 2005 based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R. In conjunction with the
provisions of SFAS 123R, the Company changed its method of attributing the value of stock-based compensation to expense from the accelerated multiple option approach to the straight line single option method. Compensation expense for all employee
share-based payment awards granted on or prior to December 31, 2005 will continue to be recognized using the accelerated multiple option approach while compensation expense for all share-based payment awards granted subsequent to
December 31, 2005 is recognized using the straight line single option method.

Pro Forma Information Under SFAS 123 for Periods
Prior to the Implementation of SFAS 123R

The following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share if the fair
value-based method had been applied to all outstanding and unvested awards in each period (in thousands, except per share data):



|                                                                                                 |  |                                      |         |   |                                     |   |         |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------ | ------- | - | ----------------------------------- | - | ------- | -
|                                                                                                 |  | Three Months EndedSeptember 30, 2005 |         |   | Nine Months EndedSeptember 30, 2005 |  
|Net loss, as reported                                                                            |  | $                                    | (11,254 | ) |                                     | $ | (19,740 | )
|Add: Stock-based compensation expense included in reported net loss                              |  |                                      | 2,745   |   |                                     |   | 3,052   |  
|Deduct: Total stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value method for all awards |  |                                      | (4,288  | ) |                                     |   | (7,354  | )
|                                                                                                 |  |                                      |         |   |                                     |   |         |  
|Pro forma net loss                                                                               |  | $                                    | (12,797 | ) |                                     | $ | (24,042 | )
|                                                                                                 |  |                                      |         |   |                                     |   |         |  
|Loss per share applicable to holders of common stock:                                            |  |                                      |         |   |                                     |   |         |  
|As reported  basic and diluted                                                                  |  | $                                    | (0.10   | ) |                                     | $ | (0.20   | )
|                                                                                                 |  |                                      |         |   |                                     |   |         |  
|Pro forma  basic and diluted                                                                    |  | $                                    | (0.11   | ) |                                     | $ | (0.24   | )
|                                                                                                 |  |                                      |         |   |                                     |   |         |  

See Note 5 for further information regarding the Companys stock-based compensation
assumptions and expense.



| | (e) | Concentration of Risk
| | --- | ---------------------

The Companys
customers include competitive and incumbent local exchange carriers, competitive access providers, Internet service providers, wireless carriers, and resellers serving these markets. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers
and generally does not require collateral. Allowances are maintained for potential doubtful accounts. For the three months ended September 30, 2006, sales to one customer represented



5



---

##### Table of Contents

12% of net revenue. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, no customer represented 10% or more of net revenue. For the three months ended
September 30, 2005, no customer represented 10% or more of net revenue. For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, sales to one customer represented 11% of net revenue. As of September 30, 2006, two customers each represented 10%
of accounts receivable. As of December 31, 2005, no customer represented 10% or more of accounts receivable.



| | (f) | Reclassifications
| | --- | -----------------

Certain reclassifications
have been made to prior period balances in order to conform to the current periods presentation. These include the reclassification of stock-based compensation expense to the associated operating expense line items in the unaudited condensed
consolidated statement of operations.



|(2) | Acquisitions
|--- | ------------

Paradyne Networks, Inc.

In September 2005, the Company completed the acquisition of Paradyne Networks, Inc. in exchange for total consideration of $184.5
million, consisting of common stock valued at $164.1 million, options and warrants to purchase common stock valued at $19.4 million, and acquisition costs of $1.0 million. Common stock and options were valued using an average closing price as
reported by Nasdaq for the two days immediately preceding and following the date of the announcement. The Company acquired Paradyne to strengthen its position as a leading provider of next-generation local access network solutions as well as
increase its customer base. Paradyne had an existing contract with the Company to resell certain of the Companys products.

In
September 2006, the purchase allocation was finalized as the Company completed its plan with respect to acquired excess facilities. The final purchase consideration was allocated as follows: net tangible assets - $48.6 million, amortizable
intangible assets - $54.8 million, purchased in-process research and development - $1.2 million, goodwill - $79.0 million, and deferred compensation - $0.9 million. The amount allocated to purchased in-process research and development was charged to
expense during the third quarter of 2005, because technological feasibility had not been established and no future alternative uses for the technology existed. The estimated fair value of the purchased in-process research and development was
determined using a discounted cash flow model, based on a discount rate which took into consideration the stage of completion and risks associated with developing the technology. Of the amount allocated to amortizable intangible assets, $12.3
million was allocated to core technology and $10.1 million was allocated to patents, both of which were assigned an estimated useful life of five years. Of the remaining $32.4 million, $3.3 million was allocated to backlog and $29.1 million was
allocated to customer relationships, which were assigned estimated useful lives of six months and seven years, respectively.



6



---

##### Table of Contents

Net tangible assets acquired consisted of total assets of $71.4 million, of which $70.4 million were
current assets, offset by adjusted assumed liabilities of $22.8 million. Assumed liabilities included employee severance and estimated exit costs which were recorded based on Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 95-3, Recognition of
Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination (EITF 95-3). As a result of the Paradyne acquisition, the Company assumed a lease commitment for facilities in Largo, Florida. The term of the lease expires in June 2012 and had an
estimated remaining obligation of approximately $27.2 million as of September 30, 2006. In September 2006, the Company finalized its plan to sublet the excess portion of these facilities and has recorded an adjustment to the purchase price
allocation of $1.0 million to increase the assumed liabilities relating to this lease. A summary of current period activity related to severance and exit costs accrued in accordance with EITF 95-3 is as follows (in thousands):



|                                       |  |           |        |   |            |   |        |       |  |   |        |  
|-------------------------------------- |  | --------- | ------ | - | ---------- | - | ------ | ----- |  | - | ------ | -
|                                       |  | Severance |        |   | Exit Costs |   |        | Total | 
|Liability recorded at acquisition date |  | $         | 5,080  |   |            | $ | 7,670  |       |  | $ | 12,750 |  
|Net cash payments                      |  |           | (4,670 | ) |            |   | (1,904 | )     |  |   | (6,574 | )
|                                       |  |           |        |   |            |   |        |       |  |   |        |  
|Balance at December 31, 2005           |  |           | 410    |   |            |   | 5,766  |       |  |   | 6,176  |  
|Net cash payments                      |  |           | (410   | ) |            |   | (1,288 | )     |  |   | (1,698 | )
|                                       |  |           |        |   |            |   |        |       |  |   |        |  
|Balance at June 30, 2006               |  |           |       |   |            | $ | 4,478  |       |  | $ | 4,478  |  
|Adjustment                             |  |           |       |   |            |   | 1,010  |       |  |   | 1,010  |  
|Net cash payments                      |  |           |       |   |            |   | (470   | )     |  |   | (470   | )
|                                       |  |           |        |   |            |   |        |       |  |   |        |  
|Balance at September 30, 2006          |  |           |       |   |            | $ | 5,018  |       |  | $ | 5,018  |  
|                                       |  |           |        |   |            |   |        |       |  |   |        |  

The following table reflects the unaudited pro forma combined results of operations of the Company
on the basis that the acquisition of Paradyne had taken place at the beginning of each period presented (in thousands, except per share data).



|                                                         |  |                                    |         |   |                                   |   |         |  
|-------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------- | ------- | - | --------------------------------- | - | ------- | -
|                                                         |  | Three MonthsEndedSeptember 30,2005 |         |   | Nine MonthsEndedSeptember 30,2005 |  
|Net revenue                                              |  | $                                  | 57,743  |   |                                   | $ | 169,923 |  
|Net loss                                                 |  |                                    | (15,723 | ) |                                   |   | (33,925 | )
|Net loss per share  basic and diluted                   |  | $                                  | (0.11   | ) |                                   | $ | (0.22   | )
|Number of shares used in computation  basic and diluted |  |                                    | 146,822 |   |                                   |   | 152,282 |  



|(3) | Long-Lived Assets, Goodwill and Other Acquisition-Related Intangible Assets
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Company tests goodwill for impairment using a two step approach on an annual basis, or when certain indicators of impairment exist in accordance with SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.
Impairment of goodwill is tested at the reporting unit level by comparing the reporting units carrying amount, including goodwill, to the fair value of the reporting unit using the market approach. The Company has determined that it operates
in a single segment with one operating unit. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, a second step is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. During the quarter ended September 30, 2006, the
Company determined that such indicators of impairment existed and the second step was performed, resulting in a goodwill impairment loss of $110.5 million. Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill were as follows (in thousands):



|                       |  |                                   |          |  
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------------- | -------- | -
|                       |  | Nine monthsendedSeptember 30,2006 |         
|Beginning balance      |  | $                                 | 180,001  |  
|Paradyne adjustment    |  |                                   | 1,010    |  
|Impairment of goodwill |  |                                   | (110,470 | )
|                       |  |                                   |          |  
|Ending balance         |  | $                                 | 70,541   |  
|                       |  |                                   |          |  

In accordance with SFAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,
the Company reviews long-lived assets, including intangible assets other than goodwill, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable based on expected undiscounted
cash flows attributable to that asset. The amount of any impairment is measured as the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the impaired asset.

The Company estimates the fair value of its long-lived assets based on a combination of the market, income and replacement cost approaches. In the application of the impairment testing, the Company



7



---

##### Table of Contents

is required to make estimates of future operating trends and resulting cash flows and judgments on discount rates and other variables. Actual future results
and other assumed variables could differ from these estimates. During the quarter ended September 30, 2006, the Company determined that indicators of impairment existed and an impairment analysis was performed resulting in an impairment loss to
amortizable intangibles of $3.2 million.

During the second quarter of 2006, the Company sold some of its non-strategic patents for $9.0
million resulting in a gain of $0.3 million.

Changes in the carrying amount of intangible assets were as follows (in thousands):



|                          |  |                                   |        |  
|------------------------- |  | --------------------------------- | ------ | -
|                          |  | Nine monthsendedSeptember 30,2006 |       
|Beginning net book value  |  | $                                 | 14,638 |  
|Amortization              |  |                                   | (2,764 | )
|Impairment of intangibles |  |                                   | (3,196 | )
|Sale of patents           |  |                                   | (8,678 | )
|                          |  |                                   |        |  
|Ending net book value     |  | $                                 |       |  

Details of the Companys acquisition-related intangible assets are as follows:



|                             |  |                    |         |                         |   |          |                |  |                            |        |  |    
|---------------------------- |  | ------------------ | ------- | ----------------------- | - | -------- | -------------- |  | -------------------------- | ------ |  | ---
|                             |  | September 30, 2006
|                             |  | GrossAmount        |         | AccumulatedAmortization |   |          | Net            |  | WeightedAverageUseful Life
|                             |  | (in thousands)     |         | (in thousands)          |   |          | (in thousands) |  | (in years)                
|Developed technology         |  | $                  | 33,420  |                         | $ | (33,420  | )              |  | $                          |       |  |   
|Customer lists/relationships |  |                    | 43,101  |                         |   | (43,101  | )              |  |                            |       |  |   
|Core technology              |  |                    | 32,358  |                         |   | (32,358  | )              |  |                            |       |  |   
|Others                       |  |                    | 3,253   |                         |   | (3,253   | )              |  |                            |       |  |   
|                             |  |                    |         |                         |   |          |                |  |                            |        |  |    
|Total                        |  | $                  | 112,132 |                         | $ | (112,132 | )              |  | $                          |       |  |    
|                             |  |                    |         |                         |   |          |                |  |                            |        |  |    
|                             | 
|                             |  | December 31, 2005 
|                             |  | GrossAmount        |         | AccumulatedAmortization |   |          | Net            |  | WeightedAverageUseful Life
|                             |  | (in thousands)     |         | (in thousands)          |   |          | (in thousands) |  | (in years)                
|Developed technology         |  | $                  | 33,420  |                         | $ | (33,420  | )              |  | $                          |       |  |   
|Customer lists/relationships |  |                    | 43,549  |                         |   | (41,822  | )              |  |                            | 1,727  |  | 6.5
|Core technology              |  |                    | 33,662  |                         |   | (32,002  | )              |  |                            | 1,660  |  | 5.0
|Others                       |  |                    | 14,807  |                         |   | (3,556   | )              |  |                            | 11,251 |  | 4.8
|                             |  |                    |         |                         |   |          |                |  |                            |        |  |    
|Total                        |  | $                  | 125,438 |                         | $ | (110,800 | )              |  | $                          | 14,638 |  |    
|                             |  |                    |         |                         |   |          |                |  |                            |        |  |    

Amortization expense of intangible assets was $0.3 million and $3.2 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $2.8 million and $7.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.



8



---

##### Table of Contents

|(4) | Inventories
|--- | -----------

Inventories as of September 30,
2006 and December 31, 2005 are as follows (in thousands):



|                |  |                   |        |                  |   |       
|--------------- |  | ----------------- | ------ | ---------------- | - | ------
|                |  | September 30,2006 |        | December 31,2005
|Inventories:    |  |                   |        |                  |   |       
|Raw materials   |  | $                 | 31,748 |                  | $ | 32,374
|Work in process |  |                   | 11,705 |                  |   | 11,388
|Finished goods  |  |                   | 4,955  |                  |   | 4,608 
|                |  |                   |        |                  |   |       
|                |  | $                 | 48,408 |                  | $ | 48,370
|                |  |                   |        |                  |   |       



|(5) | Stock-Based Compensation
|--- | ------------------------

As of September 30,
2006, the Company had two types of share-based compensation plans related to stock options and employee stock purchases. The compensation cost that has been charged as an expense in the statement of operations for those plans was $1.3 million and
$2.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $4.2 million and $3.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 (in thousands):



|                                                                    |  |                                |       |                               |   |       |  |      |       |  |   |      
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------ | ----- | ----------------------------- | - | ----- |  | ---- | ----- |  | - | -----
|                                                                    |  | Three MonthsEnded September 30 |       | Nine MonthsEnded September 30
|                                                                    |  | 2006                           |       | 2005                          |   | 2006  |  | 2005
|Amortization of deferred stock-based compensation (intrinsic value) |  | $                              |      |                               | $ | 126   |  | $    |      |  | $ | 416  
|Stock-based compensation under SFAS 123R                            |  |                                | 1,217 |                               |   |      |  |      | 3,979 |  |   |     
|Compensation expense relating to non-employees                      |  |                                | 1     |                               |   | 2,619 |  |      | 10    |  |   | 2,636
|Compensation expense relating to Employee Stock Purchase Plan       |  |                                | 100   |                               |   |      |  |      | 236   |  |   |     
|                                                                    |  |                                |       |                               |   |       |  |      |       |  |   |      
|Stock-based compensation expense                                    |  | $                              | 1,318 |                               | $ | 2,745 |  | $    | 4,225 |  | $ | 3,052
|                                                                    |  |                                |       |                               |   |       |  |      |       |  |   |      

Application of SFAS 123R had no impact on the Companys cash position or resulting statement
of cash flows.

Stock Options

The share-based compensation plans are designed to attract, motivate, retain and reward talented employees, directors and consultants and align stockholder and employee interests. The Company currently grants options from the 2001 Stock
Incentive Plan. This plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options, non statutory stock options, restricted stock awards and other stock-based awards to officers, employees, directors and consultants of the Company. Options may be granted
at an exercise price less than, equal to or greater than the fair market value on the date of grant, except that any options granted to a 10% stockholder must have an exercise price equal to at least 110% of the fair market value of the
Companys common stock on the date of grant. The Board of Directors determines the term of each option, the option exercise price and the vesting terms. Stock options generally expire seven to ten years from the date of grant and vest over a
period of four years.

The Company has estimated the fair value of stock-based payment awards on the date of grant using the Black Scholes
pricing model, which is affected by the Companys stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective variables. These variables include the Companys expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards,
actual and projected employee option exercise behaviors, risk free interest rate and expected dividends. The estimated expected



9



---

##### Table of Contents

term of options granted was determined based on historical option exercise trends. Estimated volatility was based on historical volatility as well as peer
group data and the risk free interest rate was based on U.S. Treasury yield in effect at the time of grant for the expected life of the options. The Company does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future and therefore used
an expected dividend yield of zero in the option valuation model. The Company is also required to estimate forfeitures at the time of grant and revise those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.
Historical data was used to estimate pre-vesting forfeitures and record stock-based compensation expense only for those awards that are expected to vest.

The assumptions used to value option grants for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 are as follows:



|                        |  |                                 |   |  |                                |   |  |           |   |  |           |  
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------------- | - |  | ------------------------------ | - |  | --------- | - |  | --------- | -
|                        |  | Three Months Ended September 30 |   |  | Nine Months Ended September 30 |  
|                        |  | 2006                            |   |  | 2005                           |   |  | 2006      |   |  | 2005      |  
|Expected term           |  | 4.1 years                       |   |  | 4.0 years                      |   |  | 4.5 years |   |  | 4.0 years |  
|Volatility              |  | 71                              | % |  | 73                             | % |  | 74        | % |  | 73        | %
|Risk free interest rate |  | 4.5                             | % |  | 4.24                           | % |  | 4.65      | % |  | 4.18      | %

The following table sets forth the summary of option activity under the stock option program for
the nine months ended September 30, 2006 (in thousands, except per share data):



|                                                  |  |                           |   |  |                    |   |  |                               |      |                                         |      |                         |   |      
|------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | - |  | ------------------ | - |  | ----------------------------- | ---- | --------------------------------------- | ---- | ----------------------- | - | -----
|                                                  |  | OptionsAvailablefor Grant |   |  | OptionsOutstanding |   |  | Weighted AverageExercisePrice |      | WeightedAverageRemainingContractualTerm |      | AggregateIntrinsicValue
|Outstanding as of December 31, 2005               |  | 13,366                    |   |  | 24,708             |   |  | $                             | 5.07 |                                         |      |                         |   |      
|Additional shares authorized                      |  | 5,381                     |   |  |                   |   |  |                               |      |                                         |      |                         |   |      
|Impact of frozen plans                            |  | (10,746                   | ) |  |                   |   |  |                               |      |                                         |      |                         |   |      
|Granted                                           |  | (835                      | ) |  | 835                |   |  | $                             | 2.41 |                                         |      |                         |   |      
|Canceled/Forfeited                                |  | 190                       |   |  | (1,369             | ) |  | $                             | 7.19 |                                         |      |                         |   |      
|Exercised                                         |  |                          |   |  | (773               | ) |  | $                             | 1.68 |                                         |      |                         |   |      
|                                                  |  |                           |   |  |                    |   |  |                               |      |                                         |      |                         |   |      
|Outstanding as of March 31, 2006                  |  | 7,356                     |   |  | 23,401             |   |  | $                             | 4.96 |                                         | 6.19 |                         | $ | 7,808
|Granted                                           |  | (504                      | ) |  | 504                |   |  | $                             | 2.11 |                                         |      |                         |   |      
|Canceled/Forfeited                                |  | 152                       |   |  | (348               | ) |  | $                             | 4.57 |                                         |      |                         |   |      
|Exercised                                         |  |                          |   |  | (32                | ) |  | $                             | 1.09 |                                         |      |                         |   |      
|                                                  |  |                           |   |  |                    |   |  |                               |      |                                         |      |                         |   |      
|Outstanding as of June 30, 2006                   |  | 7,004                     |   |  | 23,525             |   |  | $                             | 4.91 |                                         | 6.03 |                         | $ | 2,971
|Granted                                           |  | (3,130                    | ) |  | 3,130              |   |  | $                             | 1.57 |                                         |      |                         |   |      
|Canceled/Forfeited                                |  | 166                       |   |  | (833               | ) |  | $                             | 3.85 |                                         |      |                         |   |      
|Exercised                                         |  |                          |   |  | (39                | ) |  | $                             | 1.12 |                                         |      |                         |   |      
|                                                  |  |                           |   |  |                    |   |  |                               |      |                                         |      |                         |   |      
|Outstanding as of September 30, 2006              |  | 4,040                     |   |  | 25,783             |   |  | $                             | 4.55 |                                         | 6.03 |                         | $ | 475  
|                                                  |  |                           |   |  |                    |   |  |                               |      |                                         |      |                         |   |      
|Vested and expected to vest at September 30, 2006 |  |                           |   |  | 24,855             |   |  | $                             | 4.63 |                                         | 5.95 |                         | $ | 474  
|                                                  |  |                           |   |  |                    |   |  |                               |      |                                         |      |                         |   |      
|Exercisable at September 30, 2006                 |  |                           |   |  | 16,787             |   |  | $                             | 5.76 |                                         | 4.92 |                         | $ | 475  
|                                                  |  |                           |   |  |                    |   |  |                               |      |                                         |      |                         |   |      

The aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pretax intrinsic value, based on the
Companys closing stock price of $1.07 as of September 30, 2006, which would have been received by the option holders had the option holders exercised their options as of that date.

In February 2006, the Company amended and froze certain plans, including plans assumed through acquisitions, to provide that no further awards be made
under any of the frozen plans after February 15, 2006. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, there were 0.7 million and 2.1 million cancelled shares, respectively, relating to plans which were frozen and
therefore unavailable for grant.



10



---

##### Table of Contents

The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2006 was $0.90 and $1.16 per share, respectively. The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 was $1.52 and $1.50 per share, respectively. The
intrinsic value of options exercised during the period was $20,000. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, the Company received $43,000 and $1.4 million, respectively, in proceeds from stock option exercises.

As of September 30, 2006, there was $7.1 million of unrecognized compensation costs, adjusted for estimated forfeitures related to non-vested
stock-based payments granted which are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.87 years.

Employee Stock Purchase
Plan

The Companys 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) allows eligible employee participants to purchase shares
of the Companys common stock at a price equal to 85% of the lower of the fair market value of the common stock at the beginning or the end of each offering period. Participation is limited to 10% of an employees eligible compensation,
not to exceed amounts allowed by the Internal Revenue Code.

At September 1, 2005, the Company changed from a six month offering period
to a three month offering period under the ESPP.

During the second quarter of 2006, the number of available shares under the ESPP was
increased by 2.0 million.

The following table summarizes shares purchased, weighted average purchase price, cash received and the aggregate
intrinsic value for ESPP purchases during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 (in thousands, except per share data):



|                                |  |                                  |      |                                 |   |      |  |      |      |  |   |     
|------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- | ---- | ------------------------------- | - | ---- |  | ---- | ---- |  | - | ----
|                                |  | Three Months Ended September 30, |      | Nine Months Ended September 30,
|                                |  | 2006                             |      | 2005                            |   | 2006 |  | 2005
|Shares purchased                |  |                                  | 173  |                                 |   | 158  |  |      | 412  |  |   | 291 
|Weighted average purchase price |  | $                                | 1.38 |                                 | $ | 2.25 |  | $    | 1.64 |  | $ | 2.27
|Cash received                   |  | $                                | 238  |                                 | $ | 351  |  | $    | 678  |  | $ | 655 
|Aggregate intrinsic value       |  | $                                | 137  |                                 | $ | 68   |  | $    | 277  |  | $ | 174 

The assumptions used to value stock purchases under the Companys ESPP for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2006 are as follows:



|                                      |  |                                      |   |  |                                     |  
|------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------ | - |  | ----------------------------------- | -
|                                      |  | Three Months EndedSeptember 30, 2006 |   |  | Nine Months EndedSeptember 30, 2006 |  
|Expected term                         |  | 3 months                             |   |  | 3 months                            |  
|Volatility                            |  | 48                                   | % |  | 46                                  | %
|Risk free interest rate               |  | 4.8                                  | % |  | 4.5                                 | %
|Weighted average fair value per share |  | $      0.53                          |   |  | $      0.55                         |  



11



---

##### Table of Contents

|(6) | Net Loss Per Share
|--- | ------------------

The following table sets forth
the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share (in thousands, except per share data):



|                                                         |  |                                  |          |   |                                 |   |         |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |         |  
|-------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- | -------- | - | ------------------------------- | - | ------- | ---- |  | - | -------- | - |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                         |  | Three Months Ended September 30, |          |   | Nine Months Ended September 30, |  
|                                                         |  | 2006                             |          |   | 2005                            |   |         | 2006 |  |   | 2005     |  
|Numerator:                                               |  |                                  |          |   |                                 |   |         |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |         |  
|Net loss                                                 |  | $                                | (121,032 | ) |                                 | $ | (11,254 | )    |  | $ | (138,036 | ) |  | $ | (19,740 | )
|                                                         |  |                                  |          |   |                                 |   |         |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |         |  
|Denominator:                                             |  |                                  |          |   |                                 |   |         |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |         |  
|Weighted average common stock outstanding                |  |                                  | 148,905  |   |                                 |   | 112,138 |      |  |   | 148,589  |   |  |   | 100,289 |  
|Adjustment for common stock issued subject to repurchase |  |                                  |         |   |                                 |   | (39     | )    |  |   |         |   |  |   | (91     | )
|                                                         |  |                                  |          |   |                                 |   |         |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |         |  
|Denominator for basic and diluted calculation            |  |                                  | 148,905  |   |                                 |   | 112,099 |      |  |   | 148,589  |   |  |   | 100,198 |  
|                                                         |  |                                  |          |   |                                 |   |         |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |         |  
|Basic and diluted net loss per share                     |  | $                                | (0.81    | ) |                                 | $ | (0.10   | )    |  | $ | (0.93    | ) |  | $ | (0.20   | )

The following table sets forth potentially dilutive securities that have been excluded from the
diluted net loss per share calculation because their effect would be antidilutive for the periods indicated (in thousands, except per share data):



|                          |  |                                     |  |                              |      |                                   |        |                              |   |     
|------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- | ---- | --------------------------------- | ------ | ---------------------------- | - | ----
|                          |  | Three MonthsEnded September 30,2006 |  | WeightedAverageExercisePrice |      | Nine MonthsEndedSeptember 30,2006 |        | WeightedAverageExercisePrice
|Convertible debentures    |  | 1,231                               |  | $                            | 6.02 |                                   | 1,231  |                              | $ | 6.02
|Warrants                  |  | 2,716                               |  | $                            | 4.68 |                                   | 2,716  |                              | $ | 4.68
|Outstanding stock options |  | 25,783                              |  | $                            | 4.55 |                                   | 25,783 |                              | $ | 4.55
|                          |  |                                     |  |                              |      |                                   |        |                              |   |     
|                          |  | 29,730                              |  |                              |      |                                   | 29,730 |                              |   |     
|                          |  |                                     |  |                              |      |                                   |        |                              |   |     



|                                                    |  |                                     |  |                              |      |                                   |        |                              |   |     
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- | ---- | --------------------------------- | ------ | ---------------------------- | - | ----
|                                                    |  | Three MonthsEnded September 30,2005 |  | WeightedAverageExercisePrice |      | Nine MonthsEndedSeptember 30,2005 |        | WeightedAverageExercisePrice
|Weighted average common stock subject to repurchase |  | 39                                  |  | $                            | 2.90 |                                   | 91     |                              | $ | 2.64
|Convertible debentures                              |  | 1,473                               |  | $                            | 6.02 |                                   | 1,473  |                              | $ | 6.02
|Warrants                                            |  | 4,136                               |  | $                            | 8.19 |                                   | 4,136  |                              | $ | 8.19
|Outstanding stock options                           |  | 26,955                              |  | $                            | 5.13 |                                   | 26,955 |                              | $ | 5.13
|                                                    |  |                                     |  |                              |      |                                   |        |                              |   |     
|                                                    |  | 32,603                              |  |                              |      |                                   | 32,655 |                              |   |     
|                                                    |  |                                     |  |                              |      |                                   |        |                              |   |     



|(7) | Comprehensive Loss
|--- | ------------------

The components of comprehensive
loss, net of tax, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 were as follows (in thousands):



|                                              |  |                                  |          |   |                                 |   |         |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |         |  
|--------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- | -------- | - | ------------------------------- | - | ------- | ---- |  | - | -------- | - |  | - | ------- | -
|                                              |  | Three Months Ended September 30, |          |   | Nine Months Ended September 30, |  
|                                              |  | 2006                             |          |   | 2005                            |   |         | 2006 |  |   | 2005     |  
|Net loss                                      |  | $                                | (121,032 | ) |                                 | $ | (11,254 | )    |  | $ | (138,036 | ) |  | $ | (19,740 | )
|Other comprehensive loss:                     |  |                                  |          |   |                                 |   |         |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |         |  
|Change in unrealized gain/loss on investments |  |                                  | 6        |   |                                 |   | 57      |      |  |   | 12       |   |  |   | 33      |  
|Foreign currency translation adjustments      |  |                                  | 123      |   |                                 |   | 39      |      |  |   | 268      |   |  |   | (23     | )
|                                              |  |                                  |          |   |                                 |   |         |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |         |  
|Total comprehensive loss                      |  | $                                | (120,903 | ) |                                 | $ | (11,158 | )    |  | $ | (137,756 | ) |  | $ | (19,730 | )
|                                              |  |                                  |          |   |                                 |   |         |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |         |  



12



---

##### Table of Contents

|(8) | Commitments and Contingencies
|--- | -----------------------------

Line of Credit
and Long-Term Debt

Debt consisted of the following as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 (in thousands):



|                                                                       |  |                    |        |                  |   |       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------ | ------ | ---------------- | - | ------
|                                                                       |  | September 30, 2006 |        | December 31,2005
|Secured real estate loan due April 2011                                |  | $                  | 19,702 |                  | $ | 20,000
|Convertible debentures assumed in Sorrento acquisition due August 2007 |  |                    | 7,410  |                  |   | 8,867 
|Note payable due 2006                                                  |  |                    |       |                  |   | 900   
|                                                                       |  |                    |        |                  |   |       
|                                                                       |  |                    | 27,112 |                  |   | 29,767
|Less current portion of long-term debt                                 |  |                    | 7,667  |                  |   | 1,170 
|                                                                       |  |                    |        |                  |   |       
|                                                                       |  | $                  | 19,445 |                  | $ | 28,597
|                                                                       |  |                    |        |                  |   |       

Aggregate debt maturities as of September 30, 2006 were $0.1 million for the remainder of
2006, $7.7 million in 2007, $0.3 million in 2008, $0.3 million in 2009, $0.3 million in 2010 and $18.4 million in 2011. In addition, the Company had $14.5 million outstanding under its line of credit agreement at September 30, 2006 and
December 31, 2005.

In December 2005, the Company entered into an amendment to an existing loan with a financial institution relating
to the financing of its Oakland, California campus. As of September 30, 2006, the Company had $19.7 million of debt outstanding under this secured real estate loan which matures in April 2011. The interest rate on this debt was 8.1% as of
September 30, 2006. The Companys obligations under the loan are secured by a security interest in the Companys campus. As of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the debt was collateralized by land and buildings with
a net book value of $18.6 million and $18.9 million, respectively.

In July 2004, the Company assumed convertible debentures of $11.7
million relating to the acquisition of Sorrento Networks Corporation, with an interest rate of 7.5%. The remaining outstanding principal amount of the convertible debentures was $7.4 million as of September 30, 2006 and matures in August 2007.
The debentures are callable by the Company at any time, and can be converted into common stock at the option of the holder at a conversion price of $6.02 per share. During the quarter ended September 30, 2006, the Company paid $1.5 million of
the debentures.

In March 2005, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with a contract manufacturer. As a result of this
settlement, the Company issued a $3.8 million non-interest bearing promissory note with a term of 14 months in return for inventory and settlement of liabilities. As of September 30, 2006, no amounts were outstanding under this promissory note.

On February 24, 2006, the Company entered into an amendment to its existing revolving credit facility providing for a one year
extension of the term of the existing facility and a voluntary decrease in the size of the facility from $35 million to $25 million (the Amended Facility). Under the Amended Facility, the Company has the option of either borrowing funds
at agreed upon rates of interest or selling specific accounts receivable to the financial institution, on a limited recourse basis, at agreed upon discounts to the face amount of those accounts receivable, so long as the aggregate amount of
outstanding borrowings and purchased accounts receivable does not exceed $25 million. The amounts borrowed will bear interest, payable monthly, at a floating rate that, at the Companys option, is either (1) the financial
institutions prime rate, or (2) the sum of the LIBOR rate plus 2.9%; provided that in either case, the minimum interest rate is 4.0%. The Amended Facility contains certain financial covenants and customary affirmative covenants and
negative covenants. The interest rate was 8.25% at September 30, 2006. Under this Amended Facility, $14.5 million was outstanding at September 30, 2006 and an additional $10.3 million was committed as security for various letters of
credit.



13



---

##### Table of Contents

Leases

The Company has entered into operating leases for certain office space and equipment, some of which contain renewal options. Future minimum lease payments under all non-cancelable operating leases with terms in excess
of one year are as follows (in thousands):



|                             |  |                 |       
|---------------------------- |  | --------------- | ------
|                             |  | OperatingLeases
|Year ending December 31:     |  |                 |       
|2006 (remainder of the year) |  | $               | 1,340 
|2007                         |  |                 | 5,077 
|2008                         |  |                 | 4,616 
|2009                         |  |                 | 4,573 
|2010                         |  |                 | 4,478 
|2011                         |  |                 | 4,479 
|2012                         |  |                 | 4,478 
|                             |  |                 |       
|Total minimum lease payments |  | $               | 29,041
|                             |  |                 |       

The total minimum lease payments shown above include projected payments and obligations for leases
that the Company is no longer utilizing, some of which relate to excess facilities obtained through acquisitions. At September 30, 2006, the Company had commitments of $27.2 million related to facilities assumed as a result of the Paradyne
acquisition, of which approximately $5.0 million has been accrued for as exit costs due to excess facilities. See Note 2.

Warranties
And Other Commitments

The Company accrues for warranty costs based on historical trends for the expected material and labor costs to
provide warranty services. Warranty periods are generally one year from the date of shipment.

The following table reconciles changes in the
Companys accrued warranties and related costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 (in thousands):



|                                         |  |                                 |        |   |      |   |        |  
|---------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------- | ------ | - | ---- | - | ------ | -
|                                         |  | Nine Months Ended September 30, |       
|                                         |  | 2006                            |        |   | 2005 |  
|Beginning balance                        |  | $                               | 5,247  |   |      | $ | 5,839  |  
|Charged to cost of revenue               |  |                                 | 2,252  |   |      |   | 1,099  |  
|Warranty reserve from acquired companies |  |                                 |       |   |      |   | 2,826  |  
|Claims and settlements                   |  |                                 | (3,583 | ) |      |   | (2,853 | )
|                                         |  |                                 |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Ending balance                           |  | $                               | 3,916  |   |      | $ | 6,911  |  
|                                         |  |                                 |        |   |      |   |        |  

The Company depends on sole source and limited source suppliers for several key components and on
contract manufacturers to manufacture certain product lines. If the Company was unable to obtain these components on a timely basis, or if its contract manufacturers were unable to meet the Companys delivery requirements, the Companys
operating results could be materially adversely affected.

The Company has agreements with various contract manufacturers which include
inventory repurchase commitments for excess material based on the Companys sales forecasts. The Company has recorded a liability for estimated charges of $0.4 million and $0.8 million related to these arrangements as of September 30, 2006
and December 31, 2005, respectively.



14



---

##### Table of Contents

In connection with the acquisition of Sorrento Networks Corporation in July 2004, the Company has
recorded assumed liabilities for possible contingencies related to the resolution of a defined benefit plan. In 2000, Sorrento sold one of its subsidiaries to Entrada Networks, Inc. In connection with this transaction, Entrada assumed all
responsibilities for a defined benefit plan. Although Entrada is the sponsor of the benefit plan, it disclaims responsibility for the minimum funding contributions to the benefit plan and insists that the Company is responsible for any liability
related thereto. The Company has reserved an estimated amount which the Company expects is sufficient to cover potential claims regarding the resolution of the benefit plan.

Sale of inventory and licensing of certain intellectual property

In March 2005, the Company sold all inventory and associated assets related to one of its legacy product lines to a third party. As part of this transaction, the Company and the buyer also entered into a technology
license and option agreement in which the Company granted the buyer a license to the intellectual property associated with this legacy product line, and also granted the buyer an option to acquire the intellectual property at any time during the
term of the agreement. During the second quarter of 2006, the technology license and option agreement was amended to provide for the sale of the intellectual property and the resolution of past due amounts in exchange for $1.5 million payable in
three installments, of which $0.5 million was received in the second quarter of 2006. Future income associated with the payments received from the technology license will be recorded when and if realized due to the uncertainty of collectibility of
these amounts.

Legal Proceedings

As a result of the acquisitions of Tellium and Paradyne, the Company became involved in various legal proceedings, claims and litigation, including those identified below, relating to the operations of Tellium and
Paradyne prior to the acquisition of these entities.

Tellium Matters

On various dates between approximately December 10, 2002 and February 27, 2003, numerous class action securities complaints were filed against
Tellium in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. On May 19, 2003, a consolidated amended complaint representing all of the actions was filed. The complaint alleges, among other things, that Tellium and its
then-current directors and executive officers, and its underwriters, violated the Securities Act of 1933 by making false and misleading statements or omissions in its registration statement prospectus relating to the securities offered in the
initial public offering. The complaint further alleges that these parties violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by acting recklessly or intentionally in making the alleged misstatements and/or omissions in connection with the sale of Tellium
stock. The complaint seeks damages in an unspecified amount, including compensatory damages, costs and expenses incurred in connection with the actions and equitable relief as may be permitted by law or equity. On March 31, 2004, the court
granted Telliums and the underwriters motions to dismiss the complaint and allowed the plaintiffs to file a further amended complaint. On May 14, 2004, the plaintiffs filed a second consolidated and amended complaint. On
June 25, 2004, the Company, as Telliums successor-in-interest, and the underwriters again moved to dismiss the complaint. On June 30, 2005, the court dismissed with prejudice the plaintiffs claims under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, but denied the motions to dismiss with respect to the plaintiffs claims under the Securities Act of 1933. The plaintiffs moved for reconsideration of that portion of the courts June 30, 2005 decision dismissing their
claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. On August 26, 2005, the court denied the plaintiffs motion for reconsideration. The case proceeded to discovery. On or about March 10, 2006, the parties reached an agreement in
principle to settle the case. The court issued an order preliminarily approving the settlement on or about May 30, 2006. The court provided its final approval of the settlement and dismissal of the plaintiffs claims in an order and final
judgment dated September 7, 2006. The settlement had no material impact to the Companys statement of operations.



15



---

##### Table of Contents

The Denver, Colorado regional office of the SEC is conducting two investigations titled In the Matter
of Qwest Communications International Inc.and In the Matter of Issuers Related to Qwest. The first of these investigations does not appear to involve any allegation of wrongful conduct on the part of Tellium. In connection with the
second investigation, the SEC is examining various transactions and business relationships involving Qwest and eleven companies having a vendor relationship with Qwest, including Tellium. The Company, as Telliums successor-in-interest, has not
had any substantive communications with the SEC regarding the investigation since 2003.

In addition, the United States Attorney in Denver
is conducting an investigation involving Qwest, including Qwests relationships with certain of its vendors, including Tellium. In connection with that investigation, the U.S. Attorney has sought documents and information from Tellium and has
sought interviews and/or grand jury testimony from persons associated or formerly associated with Tellium, including certain of its officers. The U.S. Attorney has indicated that neither Tellium nor any of the Companys current or former
officers or employees is a target of the investigation.

Paradyne Matters

A purported stockholder class action complaint was filed in December 2001 in the United States District Court in the Southern District of New York against
Paradyne, Paradynes then-current directors and executive officers, and each of the underwriters (the Underwriter Defendants) who participated in Paradynes initial public offering and follow-on offering (collectively, the
Paradyne Offerings). The complaint alleges that, in connection with the Paradyne Offerings, the Underwriter Defendants charged excessive commissions, inflated transaction fees not disclosed in the applicable registration statements and
allocated shares of the Paradyne Offerings to favored customers in exchange for purported promises by such customers to purchase additional shares in the aftermarket, thereby allegedly inflating the market price for the Paradyne Offerings. The
complaint seeks damages in an unspecified amount for the purported class for the losses suffered during the class period. This action has been consolidated with hundreds of other securities class actions commenced against more than 300 companies
(collectively, the Issuer Defendants) and approximately 40 investment banks in which the plaintiffs make substantially similar allegations as those made against Paradyne with respect to the initial public offerings and/or follow-on
offerings at issue in those other cases. All of these actions have been consolidated under the caption In re: Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation(the IPO Actions). In 2003, the Issuer Defendants participated in a global
settlement among the plaintiffs and the insurance companies that provided directors and officers insurance coverage to the Issuer Defendants. The settlement agreements provide for the Issuer Defendants (including Paradyne) to be fully
released and dismissed from the IPO Actions. Under the terms of the settlement agreements, Paradyne is not required to make any cash payment to the plaintiffs. Although the court preliminarily approved the settlement agreements, the preliminary
approval is subject to a future final settlement order, after notice of settlement has been provided to class members and they have been afforded the opportunity to oppose or opt out of the settlement. There can be no assurance that these conditions
for final settlement will be satisfied.

Other Matters

The Company is subject to other legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these matters is
currently not determinable, management does not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations. However, litigation is
subject to inherent uncertainties, and unfavorable rulings could occur. If an unfavorable ruling were to occur, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on the results of operations of the period in which the ruling occurs, or
future periods.



16



---

##### Table of Contents

|(9) | Segment Information
|--- | -------------------

The Company designs, develops
and markets communications products for network service providers. The Company derives substantially all of its revenues from the sales of the Zhone product family. The Companys chief operating decision maker is the Companys Chief
Executive Officer. The Chief Executive Officer reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis accompanied by disaggregated information about revenues by geographic region for purposes of making operating decisions and assessing
financial performance. The Company has determined that it has operated within one discrete reportable business segment since inception. The following summarizes required disclosures about geographic concentrations and revenue by product family.



|                            |  |                                 |        |                                |   |        |  |      |         |  |   |       
|--------------------------- |  | ------------------------------- | ------ | ------------------------------ | - | ------ |  | ---- | ------- |  | - | ------
|                            |  | Three Months EndedSeptember 30, |        | Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
|                            |  | 2006                            |        | 2005                           |   | 2006   |  | 2005
|                            |  | (in thousands)                  |        | (in thousands)                
|Revenue by Geography:       |  |                                 |        |                                |   |        |  |      |         |  |   |       
|United States               |  | $                               | 25,327 |                                | $ | 22,805 |  | $    | 80,400  |  | $ | 57,263
|Canada                      |  |                                 | 1,857  |                                |   | 3,453  |  |      | 7,514   |  |   | 9,340 
|                            |  |                                 |        |                                |   |        |  |      |         |  |   |       
|Total North America         |  |                                 | 27,184 |                                |   | 26,258 |  |      | 87,914  |  |   | 66,603
|                            |  |                                 |        |                                |   |        |  |      |         |  |   |       
|Latin America               |  |                                 | 6,660  |                                |   | 1,715  |  |      | 19,940  |  |   | 3,184 
|Europe, Middle East, Africa |  |                                 | 7,460  |                                |   | 11,788 |  |      | 35,718  |  |   | 26,215
|Asia Pacific                |  |                                 | 1,834  |                                |   | 854    |  |      | 6,466   |  |   | 2,621 
|                            |  |                                 |        |                                |   |        |  |      |         |  |   |       
|Total International         |  |                                 | 15,954 |                                |   | 14,357 |  |      | 62,124  |  |   | 32,020
|                            |  |                                 |        |                                |   |        |  |      |         |  |   |       
|                            |  | $                               | 43,138 |                                | $ | 40,615 |  | $    | 150,038 |  | $ | 98,623
|                            |  |                                 |        |                                |   |        |  |      |         |  |   |       
|                            |  |                                
|                            |  | Three Months EndedSeptember 30, |        | Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
|                            |  | 2006                            |        | 2005                           |   | 2006   |  | 2005
|                            |  | (in thousands)                  |        | (in thousands)                
|Revenue by Product Family:  |  |                                 |        |                                |   |        |  |      |         |  |   |       
|SLMS                        |  | $                               | 23,608 |                                | $ | 18,145 |  | $    | 92,035  |  | $ | 37,090
|Legacy and Service          |  |                                 | 15,081 |                                |   | 17,261 |  |      | 42,444  |  |   | 44,440
|Optical Transport           |  |                                 | 4,449  |                                |   | 5,209  |  |      | 15,559  |  |   | 17,093
|                            |  |                                 |        |                                |   |        |  |      |         |  |   |       
|Total revenue               |  | $                               | 43,138 |                                | $ | 40,615 |  | $    | 150,038 |  | $ | 98,623
|                            |  |                                 |        |                                |   |        |  |      |         |  |   |       



|(10) | Repayment of Promissory Notes
|---- | -----------------------------

In July 2002, the
Company loaned $350,000 to Morteza Ejabat in connection with his purchase of 3,500,000 shares of common stock and $200,000 to Jeanette Symons in connection with her purchase of 2,000,000 shares of common stock. These loans were made pursuant to
promissory notes which accrue interest at a rate of 5.5% per annum compounded annually. During the quarter ended September 30, 2006, the outstanding principal amounts of the promissory notes and accrued interest were repaid according to
the original terms of the notes.



17



---

##### Table of Contents

|Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This report, including Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains forward-looking
statements regarding future events and our future results that are subject to the safe harbors created under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements are based on current expectations, estimates,
forecasts, and projections about the industries in which we operate and the beliefs and assumptions of our management. We use words such as anticipate, believe, continue, could, estimate,
expect, goal, intend, may, plan, project, seek, should, target, will, would, variations of such words, and similar
expressions to identify forward-looking statements. In addition, statements that refer to anticipated growth and trends in our business or key markets; future growth and revenues from our SLMS products; improvements in the capital spending
environment; future economic conditions and performance; plans, objectives and strategies for future operations; and other characterizations of future events or circumstances, are forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that these
forward-looking statements are only predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual results may differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking
statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, our ability to generate sufficient revenue to achieve or sustain profitability, our ability to raise additional capital to fund existing and future operations,
defects or other performance problems in our products, the economic slowdown in the telecommunications industry that has restricted the ability of our customers to purchase our products, commercial acceptance of our SLMS products, intense
competition in the communications equipment market from large equipment companies as well as private companies with products that address the same networks needs as our products, and other factors identified elsewhere in this report and in our most
recent reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements for any reason.

OVERVIEW

We believe that we are the first company dedicated solely to developing the full spectrum of next-generation access network solutions
to cost-effectively deliver high bandwidth services while simultaneously preserving the investment in todays networks. Our next-generation solutions are based upon our Single Line Multi Service, or SLMS, architecture. From its inception, this
SLMS architecture was specifically designed for the delivery of multiple classes of subscriber services (such as voice, data and video distribution), rather than being based on a particular protocol or media. In other words, our SLMS products are
built to support the migration from legacy circuit to packet technologies and from copper to fiber technologies. This flexibility and versatility allows our products to adapt to future technologies while allowing service providers to focus on the
delivery of additional high bandwidth services. Because this SLMS architecture is designed to interoperate with existing legacy equipment, service providers can leverage their existing networks to deliver a combination of voice, data and video
services today, while they migrate, either simultaneously or at a future date, from legacy equipment to next-generation equipment with minimal interruption. We believe that our SLMS solution provides an evolutionary path for service providers from
their existing infrastructures, as well as gives newer service providers the capability to deploy cost-effective, multi-service networks that can support voice, data and video.

Our product offerings fall within three categories: the SLMS product family; optical transport products; and legacy products and services. Our global
customer base includes regional, national and international telecommunications carriers, as well as cable service providers. We believe that we have assembled the employee base, technological breadth and market presence to provide a simple yet
comprehensive set of next-generation solutions to the bandwidth bottleneck in the access network and the other problems encountered by network service providers when delivering communications services to subscribers.



18



---

##### Table of Contents

Since inception, we have incurred significant operating losses and had an accumulated deficit of $896.3
million at September 30, 2006.

Going forward, our key financial objectives include the following:



| |  |  | Increasing revenue while continuing to carefully control costs;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Continued investments in strategic research and product development activities that will provide the maximum potential return on investment;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Minimizing consumption of our cash and short-term investments; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Analyzing and pursuing strategic acquisitions that will allow us to expand our customer, technology and revenue base.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Basis of Presentation

The condensed consolidated
financial statements are unaudited and reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. The results
of operations for the current interim period are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the current year or any other period. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Acquisitions

As of September 30, 2006, we had completed twelve acquisitions of complementary companies, products or technologies to supplement our internal
growth. To date, we have generated a significant amount of our revenue from sales of products obtained through acquisitions.

If we complete
additional acquisitions in the future, we could consume cash, incur substantial additional debt and other liabilities, incur amortization expenses related to acquired intangible assets or incur large write-offs related to impairment of goodwill and
long-lived assets. In addition, future acquisitions may have a significant impact on our short term results of operations, materially impacting revenues or expenses and making period to period comparisons of our results of operations less
meaningful.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities. The policies discussed below are considered by management to be critical because changes in such estimates can materially affect the amount of our reported net income or loss. For all of these policies, management
cautions that actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue when the earnings process is complete. We recognize product revenue upon shipment of product under contractual terms which
transfer title to customers upon shipment, under normal credit terms, or under sales-type leases, net of estimated sales returns and allowances at the time of shipment. Revenue is deferred if there are significant post-delivery obligations, if
collection is not considered reasonably assured at the time of sale, or if the fees are not fixed or determinable. When significant post-delivery obligations exist, revenue is deferred until such obligations are



19



---

##### Table of Contents

fulfilled. Our arrangements generally do not have any significant post-delivery obligations. We offer products and services such as support, education and
training, hardware upgrades and post-warranty support. For multiple element revenue arrangements, we establish the fair value of these products and services based primarily on sales prices when the products and services are sold separately. If fair
value cannot be established for undelivered elements, all of the revenue under the arrangement is deferred until those elements have been delivered. When collectibility is not reasonably assured, revenue is recognized when cash is collected. Revenue
from education services and support services is recognized over the contract term or as the service is performed. We make certain sales to product distributors. These customers are given certain privileges to return a portion of inventory. Return
privileges generally allow distributors to return inventory based on a percent of purchases made within a specific period of time. We recognize revenue on sales to distributors that have contractual return rights when the products have been sold by
the distributors, unless there is sufficient customer specific sales and sales returns history to support revenue recognition upon shipment. In those instances when shipments made to distributors are recognized upon shipment of the products from the
factory, we use historical rates of return from the distributors to provide for estimated product returns in accordance with SFAS 48, Revenue Recognition When Right of Return Exists. Revenue from sales of software products is recognized
provided that a purchase order has been received, the software has been shipped, collection of the resulting receivable is probable, and the amount of the related fees is fixed or determinable. To date, revenue from software transactions and
sales-type leases has not been significant. We accrue for warranty costs, sales returns and other allowances at the time of shipment based on historical experience and expected future costs.

Allowances for Sales Returns and Doubtful Accounts

We record an allowance for sales returns for estimated future product returns related to current period product revenue. The allowance for sales returns is recorded as a reduction of revenue and an allowance against our accounts receivable.
We base our allowance for sales returns on periodic assessments of historical trends in product return rates and current approved returned products. If the actual future returns were to deviate from the historical data on which the reserve had been
established, our future revenue could be adversely affected. We record an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of customers to make payments for amounts owed to us. The allowance for doubtful accounts is
recorded as a charge to general and administrative expenses. We base our allowance on periodic assessments of our customers liquidity and financial condition through analysis of information obtained from credit rating agencies, financial
statement reviews, and historical collection trends. Additional allowances may be required in the future if the liquidity or financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment in their ability to make payments.

Stock-Based Compensation

In the first
quarter of 2006, we adopted SFAS 123R, which required the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors based on estimated fair values. We adopted the modified prospective
method of transition under which prior periods are not restated for comparative purposes. We have estimated the fair value of stock-based payment awards on the date of grant using the Black Scholes pricing model, which is affected by our stock price
as well as assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective variables. These variables include our expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, actual and projected employee option exercise behaviors, risk free interest rate
and expected dividends. If factors change, and we employ different assumptions for estimating stock-based compensation expense in future periods, or if we decide to use a different valuation model, the future periods may differ significantly from
what we have recorded in the current period and could materially affect our operating income, net loss and net loss per share. We are also required to estimate forfeitures at the time of grant and revise those estimates in subsequent periods if
actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.



20



---

##### Table of Contents

Fair value stock-based compensation expense under SFAS 123R for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2006 includes compensation expense for share-based payment awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of December 31, 2005 based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the pro-forma provisions of SFAS
123 and compensation expense for the share-based payment awards granted subsequent to December 31, 2005 based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R. In conjunction with the provisions of SFAS
123R, we changed our method of attributing the value of stock-based compensation to expense from the accelerated multiple option approach to the straight line single option method. Compensation expense for all employee share-based payment awards
granted on or prior to December 31, 2005 will continue to be recognized using the accelerated multiple option approach while compensation expense for all share-based payment awards granted subsequent to December 31, 2005 is recognized
using the straight line single option method.

Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, we recognized compensation cost for stock options issued
or assumed through acquisitions, based on the intrinsic value, which represents the difference between the exercise price of each stock option granted or assumed and the fair market value of the underlying common stock at the grant date or
consummation date of the business combination. The resulting deferred stock compensation was amortized over the vesting periods of the applicable options. In addition, stock-based compensation expense was recorded for options issued to
non-employees. These options are generally immediately exercisable and expire seven to ten years from the date of grant. We value non-employee options using the Black Scholes model. Non-employee options subject to vesting are valued as they become
vested. See Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for further information.

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets, Including Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets

Our long-lived assets consist primarily of goodwill and property and equipment. We review long-lived assets for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Such events or circumstances include, but are not limited to, a significant decrease in the benefits realized from the
acquired business, difficulty and delays in integrating the business, or a significant change in the operations of the acquired business or use of an asset. Goodwill and other intangible assets not subject to amortization are tested annually for
impairment using a two-step approach, and are tested for impairment more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the
assets fair value. We estimate the fair value of our long-lived assets based on a combination of the market, income and replacement cost approaches. In the application of the impairment testing, we are required to make estimates of future
operating trends and resulting cash flows, and judgments on discount rates and other variables. Actual future results and other assumed variables could differ from these estimates. During the quarter ended September 30, 2006, we determined that
such indicators of impairment existed, resulting in an impairment loss to goodwill and amortizable intangibles of $110.5 million and $3.2 million, respectively.

As of September 30, 2006, we had $70.5 million of goodwill and $24.1 million of property and equipment. Our future operating performance will be impacted by potential charges related to purchased in-process
research and development for future acquisitions, and potential impairment charges related to goodwill. Accordingly, the allocation of the purchase price of the acquired companies to goodwill has a significant impact on our future operating results.
The allocation process requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions, including estimates of future cash flows expected to be generated by the acquired assets and the appropriate discount rate for these cash flows. Should
different conditions prevail, we would have to perform an impairment review that might result in impairment of the goodwill. Other factors we consider important which could trigger an impairment review, include, but are not limited to, significant
changes in the manner of use of our



21



---

##### Table of Contents

acquired assets, significant changes in the strategy for our overall business or significant negative economic trends, such as stock price movements. Due to
uncertain market conditions and potential changes in our strategy and product portfolio, it is possible that forecasts used to support our goodwill may change in the future, which could result in additional non-cash impairment charges that would
adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

We list in the tables below the historical condensed consolidated statement of operations data as a percentage of revenue for the periods indicated.



|                                              |  |                                  |    |  |                                 |    |  |      |    |  |      |   
|--------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- | -- |  | ------------------------------- | -- |  | ---- | -- |  | ---- | --
|                                              |  | Three Months Ended September 30, |    |  | Nine Months Ended September 30, |   
|                                              |  | 2006                             |    |  | 2005                            |    |  | 2006 |    |  | 2005 |   
|Net revenue                                   |  | 100                              | %  |  | 100                             | %  |  | 100  | %  |  | 100  | % 
|Cost of revenue                               |  | 65                               | %  |  | 59                              | %  |  | 69   | %  |  | 58   | % 
|                                              |  |                                  |    |  |                                 |    |  |      |    |  |      |   
|Gross profit                                  |  | 35                               | %  |  | 41                              | %  |  | 31   | %  |  | 42   | % 
|Operating expenses:                           |  |                                  |    |  |                                 |    |  |      |    |  |      |   
|Research and product development              |  | 21                               | %  |  | 18                              | %  |  | 18   | %  |  | 19   | % 
|Sales and marketing                           |  | 22                               | %  |  | 18                              | %  |  | 20   | %  |  | 21   | % 
|General and administrative                    |  | 9                                | %  |  | 20                              | %  |  | 7    | %  |  | 11   | % 
|Purchased in process research and development |  | 0                                | %  |  | 3                               | %  |  | 0    | %  |  | 1    | % 
|Amortization of intangible assets             |  | 1                                | %  |  | 8                               | %  |  | 2    | %  |  | 8    | % 
|Impairment of intangible assets and goodwill  |  | 263                              | %  |  | 0                               | %  |  | 76   | %  |  | 0    | % 
|                                              |  |                                  |    |  |                                 |    |  |      |    |  |      |   
|Total operating expenses                      |  | 316                              | %  |  | 67                              | %  |  | 123  | %  |  | 60   | % 
|                                              |  |                                  |    |  |                                 |    |  |      |    |  |      |   
|Operating loss                                |  | (281                             | )% |  | (26                             | )% |  | (92  | )% |  | (18  | )%
|Interest expense                              |  | (2                               | )% |  | (2                              | )% |  | (1   | )% |  | (3   | )%
|Interest income                               |  | 2                                | %  |  | 1                               | %  |  | 1    | %  |  | 1    | % 
|Other income (expense), net                   |  | 0                                | %  |  | 0                               | %  |  | 0    | %  |  | 0    | % 
|                                              |  |                                  |    |  |                                 |    |  |      |    |  |      |   
|Loss before income taxes                      |  | (281                             | )% |  | (28                             | )% |  | (92  | )% |  | (20  | )%
|Income tax provision                          |  | 0                                | %  |  | 0                               | %  |  | 0    | %  |  | 0    | % 
|                                              |  |                                  |    |  |                                 |    |  |      |    |  |      |   
|Net loss                                      |  | (281                             | )% |  | (28                             | )% |  | (92  | )% |  | (20  | )%
|                                              |  |                                  |    |  |                                 |    |  |      |    |  |      |   

Revenue

Information about our revenue for products and services for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 is summarized below (in millions):



|         |  |                                  |      |      |                                 |                    |  |          |     |  |      |   |      |   |                    |  |          |      |  |   |      |  |    |  
|-------- |  | -------------------------------- | ---- | ---- | ------------------------------- | ------------------ |  | -------- | --- |  | ---- | - | ---- | - | ------------------ |  | -------- | ---- |  | - | ---- |  | -- | -
|         |  | Three Months Ended September 30, |      |      | Nine Months Ended September 30, |                   
|         |  | 2006                             |      | 2005 |                                 | Increase(Decrease) |  | % Change |     |  | 2006 |   | 2005 |   | Increase(Decrease) |  | % Change |     
|Products |  | $                                | 39.9 |      | $                               | 37.4               |  | $        | 2.5 |  | 7    | % |      | $ | 140.8              |  | $        | 89.8 |  | $ | 51.0 |  | 57 | %
|Services |  |                                  | 3.2  |      |                                 | 3.2                |  |          |    |  |     | % |      |   | 9.2                |  |          | 8.8  |  |   | 0.4  |  | 5  | %
|         |  |                                  |      |      |                                 |                    |  |          |     |  |      |   |      |   |                    |  |          |      |  |   |      |  |    |  
|Total    |  | $                                | 43.1 |      | $                               | 40.6               |  | $        | 2.5 |  | 6    | % |      | $ | 150.0              |  | $        | 98.6 |  | $ | 51.4 |  | 52 | %
|         |  |                                  |      |      |                                 |                    |  |          |     |  |      |   |      |   |                    |  |          |      |  |   |      |  |    |  



22



---

##### Table of Contents

Information about our revenue for North America and International markets for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 is summarized below (in millions):



|                            |  |                                  |      |      |                                 |                     |  |   |          |   |  |      |    |      |   |                     |  |   |          |  |   |      |    |  |     |   
|--------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- | ---- | ---- | ------------------------------- | ------------------- |  | - | -------- | - |  | ---- | -- | ---- | - | ------------------- |  | - | -------- |  | - | ---- | -- |  | --- | --
|                            |  | Three Months Ended September 30, |      |      | Nine Months Ended September 30, |                    
|                            |  | 2006                             |      | 2005 |                                 | Increase (Decrease) |  |   | % change |   |  | 2006 |    | 2005 |   | Increase (Decrease) |  |   | % change | 
|Revenue by geography:       |  |                                  |      |      |                                 |                     |  |   |          |   |  |      |    |      |   |                     |  |   |          |  |   |      |    |  |     |   
|United States               |  | $                                | 25.3 |      | $                               | 22.8                |  | $ | 2.5      |   |  | 11   | %  |      | $ | 80.4                |  | $ | 57.3     |  | $ | 23.1 |    |  | 40  | % 
|Canada                      |  |                                  | 1.9  |      |                                 | 3.5                 |  |   | (1.6     | ) |  | (46  | )% |      |   | 7.5                 |  |   | 9.3      |  |   | (1.8 | )_ |  | (19 | )%
|                            |  |                                  |      |      |                                 |                     |  |   |          |   |  |      |    |      |   |                     |  |   |          |  |   |      |    |  |     |   
|Total North America         |  |                                  | 27.2 |      |                                 | 26.3                |  |   | 0.9      |   |  | 3    | %  |      |   | 87.9                |  |   | 66.6     |  |   | 21.3 |    |  | 32  | % 
|                            |  |                                  |      |      |                                 |                     |  |   |          |   |  |      |    |      |   |                     |  |   |          |  |   |      |    |  |     |   
|Latin America               |  |                                  | 6.6  |      |                                 | 1.7                 |  |   | 4.9      |   |  | 288  | %  |      |   | 19.9                |  |   | 3.2      |  |   | 16.7 |    |  | 522 | % 
|Europe, Middle East, Africa |  |                                  | 7.5  |      |                                 | 11.7                |  |   | (4.2     | ) |  | (36  | )% |      |   | 35.8                |  |   | 26.2     |  |   | 9.6  |    |  | 37  | % 
|Asia Pacific                |  |                                  | 1.8  |      |                                 | 0.9                 |  |   | 0.9      |   |  | 100  | %  |      |   | 6.4                 |  |   | 2.6      |  |   | 3.8  |    |  | 146 | % 
|                            |  |                                  |      |      |                                 |                     |  |   |          |   |  |      |    |      |   |                     |  |   |          |  |   |      |    |  |     |   
|Total International         |  |                                  | 15.9 |      |                                 | 14.3                |  |   | 1.6      |   |  | 11   | %  |      |   | 62.1                |  |   | 32.0     |  |   | 30.1 |    |  | 94  | % 
|                            |  |                                  |      |      |                                 |                     |  |   |          |   |  |      |    |      |   |                     |  |   |          |  |   |      |    |  |     |   
|Total                       |  | $                                | 43.1 |      | $                               | 40.6                |  | $ | 2.5      |   |  | 6    | %  |      | $ | 150.0               |  | $ | 98.6     |  | $ | 51.4 |    |  | 52  | % 
|                            |  |                                  |      |      |                                 |                     |  |   |          |   |  |      |    |      |   |                     |  |   |          |  |   |      |    |  |     |   

Information about our revenue by product line for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2006 and 2005 is summarized below (in millions):



|                   |  |                                  |      |      |                                 |                    |  |   |         |   |  |      |    |      |   |                    |  |   |         |  |   |      |   |  |     |   
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------- | ---- | ---- | ------------------------------- | ------------------ |  | - | ------- | - |  | ---- | -- | ---- | - | ------------------ |  | - | ------- |  | - | ---- | - |  | --- | --
|                   |  | Three Months Ended September 30, |      |      | Nine Months Ended September 30, |                   
|                   |  | 2006                             |      | 2005 |                                 | Increase(Decrease) |  |   | %change |   |  | 2006 |    | 2005 |   | Increase(Decrease) |  |   | %change | 
|SLMS               |  | $                                | 23.6 |      | $                               | 18.1               |  | $ | 5.5     |   |  | 30   | %  |      | $ | 92.0               |  | $ | 37.1    |  | $ | 54.9 |   |  | 148 | % 
|Legacy and Service |  |                                  | 15.1 |      |                                 | 17.3               |  |   | (2.2    | ) |  | (13  | )% |      |   | 42.4               |  |   | 44.4    |  |   | (2.0 | ) |  | (5  | )%
|Optical Transport  |  |                                  | 4.4  |      |                                 | 5.2                |  |   | (0.8    | ) |  | (15  | )% |      |   | 15.6               |  |   | 17.1    |  |   | (1.5 | ) |  | (9  | )%
|                   |  |                                  |      |      |                                 |                    |  |   |         |   |  |      |    |      |   |                    |  |   |         |  |   |      |   |  |     |   
|                   |  | $                                | 43.1 |      | $                               | 40.6               |  | $ | 2.5     |   |  | 6    | %  |      | $ | 150.0              |  | $ | 98.6    |  | $ | 51.4 |   |  | 52  | % 
|                   |  |                                  |      |      |                                 |                    |  |   |         |   |  |      |    |      |   |                    |  |   |         |  |   |      |   |  |     |   

For the three months ended September 30, 2006, revenue increased 6% or $2.5 million to $43.1
million from $40.6 million for the same period last year. The increase in revenue was due to incremental revenue from the Paradyne acquisition, offset by lower sales of legacy products. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, revenue
increased 52% or $51.4 million to $150.0 million from $98.6 million for the same period last year. The increase in total revenue was primarily due to incremental revenue relating to the acquisition of Paradyne in September 2005, and increased demand
for our SLMS products compared to the prior year, particularly in the international territories. Product revenue accounted for the majority of the total increase in revenue. For the three months ended September 30, 2006, product revenue
increased $2.5 million or 7% to $39.9 million from $37.4 million, and $51.0 million or 57% to $140.8 million from $89.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared to the same period last year. Service revenue remained
consistent for the three months ended September 30, 2006 compared to 2005, and increased by $0.4 million or 5% to $9.2 million from $8.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005. Service
revenue represents revenue from maintenance and other services associated with product shipments. International revenue increased 11% or $1.6 million to $15.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 from $14.3 million for the same
period last year. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, international revenue increased 94% or $30.1 million to $62.1 million from $32.0 million for the same period last year. The significant increase in international revenue represents
the increasing opportunity for our next-generation products in both existing and new network deployments among international carriers in the Middle East and Latin America, as well as incremental revenue from Paradyne products.

By product family, revenue for our SLMS product family increased by $5.5 million or 30% to $23.6 million from $18.1 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2006 compared to the same period last year, and $54.9 million or 148% to $92.0 million from $37.1 million for the nine months



23



---

##### Table of Contents

ended September 30, 2006, as compared to the same period last year. For the three months ended September 30, 2006, SLMS revenue increased due to
the incremental revenue associated with Paradynes broadband products. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, revenue also increased due to increased adoption of IPTV, VoIP and broadband services, creating increased demand for our
SLMS products, particularly in international territories. Revenue for our legacy products and services decreased $2.2 million or 13% to $15.1 million from $17.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the same
period last year. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, legacy products and services decreased by $2.0 million or 5% to $42.4 million from $44.4 million in the same period last year. In addition, the decline in legacy products was
partially offset by incremental Paradyne revenue in 2006. The decline in legacy products shows the continuing shift in our reliance on legacy technologies as our rapidly growing SLMS business continues to overtake it. Decreased demand in our optical
transport products of $0.8 million or 15% for the three months ended September 30, 2006, and $1.5 million decrease or 9% to $15.6 million from $17.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the same periods in 2005,
reflect continued fluctuation as a result of significant customer concentration.

We expect that the product mix will continue to shift
toward next-generation products in SLMS and optical transport. While we have experienced significant growth in international markets, we have recently encountered price-focused competitors and we anticipate this will continue.

For the three months ended September 30, 2006, sales to one customer represented 12% of net revenue. For the nine months ended September 30,
2006, no customer represented 10% or more of net revenue. For the three months ended September 30, 2005, no customer represented 10% or more of net revenue. For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, sales to one customer represented
11% of net revenue. As of September 30, 2006, two customers each represented 10% of accounts receivable. We anticipate that our results of operations in any given period may depend to a large extent on sales to a small number of large accounts.
As a result, our revenue for any quarter may be subject to significant volatility based upon changes in orders from one or a small number of key customers.

Cost of Revenue and Gross Profit

Total cost of revenue, including stock-based compensation, increased $4.2 million or 18%
to $28.0 million from $23.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006, and $46.3 million or 81% to $103.4 million from $57.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the same periods in prior year. For
the three months ended September 30, 2006, cost of sales increased primarily due to higher personnel related costs as we had anticipated larger revenue growth during the third quarter of 2006. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006,
cost of revenue also increased due to a $7.2 million write off of inventory in the second quarter of 2006 related to reduced demand of legacy products. In addition, gross profit decreased due to lower pricing on two large strategic international
customers. Total cost of revenue was 65% and 59% of revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and 69% and 58% of revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Additionally,
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, approximately $0.2 million and $0.7 million of stock-based compensation expense was included in cost of sales expenses, respectively, compared to only $22,000 and $74,000 during the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2005, respectively, primarily due to the implementation of SFAS 123R in January 2006.

We expect
that in the future, our cost of revenue as a percentage of net revenue will vary depending on the mix and average selling prices of products sold. In addition, competitive and economic pressures could cause us to reduce our prices, adjust the
carrying values of our inventory, or record inventory charges relating to discontinued products and excess or obsolete inventory.



24



---

##### Table of Contents

Research and Product Development Expenses

Research and product development expenses increased 22% or $1.6 million to $9.0 million from $7.4 million for the three months ended September 30,
2006 compared to 2005, and increased 45% or $8.5 million to $27.5 million from $19.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to 2005. The increase was primarily due to new product development efforts on products.
Additionally, there were increased personnel related costs to support development efforts on acquired technologies.We intend to continue to invest in research and product development to attain our strategic product development objectives,
while seeking to manage the associated costs through expense controls. Additionally, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, approximately $0.4 million and $1.3 million of stock-based compensation expense was included in
research and product development expenses, respectively, compared to only $52,000 and $0.2 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, respectively, primarily due to the implementation of SFAS 123R in January 2006.

Sales and Marketing Expenses

Sales
and marketing expenses increased 25% or $1.9 million to $9.3 million from $7.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 compared to 2005, and increased 45% or $9.2 million to $29.6 million from $20.4 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006 compared to 2005. The increase was primarily attributable to higher commissions and other personnel related costs to support an increased customer base as well as revenue growth, particularly in the international
territories, resulting from the Paradyne acquisition, and increased spending on trade shows, travel and other marketing related promotions. Additionally, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, approximately $0.3 million and
$1.1 million of stock-based compensation expense was included in sales and marketing expenses compared to only $54,000 and $0.2 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, respectively, primarily due to the implementation
of SFAS 123R in January 2006.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses decreased 51% or $4.1 million to $3.9 million from $8.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 compared to 2005, and increased 1% or $0.1 million to $11.1
million from $11.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to 2005. For the three months ended September 30, 2006, the decrease was primarily due to non recurring charges associated with the Paradyne acquisition in
the prior year. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the decrease was offset by increased costs to support a larger organization as a result of the Paradyne acquisition, higher bad debt associated with a customer bankruptcy in the
first quarter of 2006 compared to a debt recovery in the prior year and higher legal fees associated with various matters.

Purchased in process
research and development

In September 2005, we recorded purchased in process research and development of $1.2 million related to the
acquisition of Paradyne. This amount was charged to expense because technological feasibility had not been established and no future alternative uses for the technology existed at the time of acquisition. The estimated fair value of the purchased
in-process research and development was determined using a discounted cash flow model, based on a discount rate which took into consideration the stage of completion and risks associated with developing the technology.

Amortization of Intangible Assets

For the three
months ended September 30, 2006, amortization of intangible assets, decreased by $2.9 million to $0.3 million from $3.2 million compared to the same period in the previous year. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, amortization of
intangible assets decreased $5.0 million to



25



---

##### Table of Contents

$2.8 million from $7.7 million compared to 2005. The decrease was primarily due to the sale of patents in the second quarter of 2006, and impairment of
intangibles in the fourth quarter of 2005.

Impairment of intangible assets and goodwill

We review goodwill and other long-lived assets, including intangible assets, for impairment annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. During the quarter ended September 30, 2006, we determined that indicators of impairment existed. We performed an impairment analysis which resulted in a non-cash goodwill
impairment charge of $110.5 million as the fair value of our reporting unit was less than book value. See Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for further detail. We also recorded a non-cash impairment charge for other intangible assets
of $3.2 million, which represented the amount by which the carrying value of the intangible assets exceeded the fair value.

Interest Expense

Interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2006 decreased by $0.2 million to $0.6 million from $0.8 million
compared to 2005, and decreased by $0.6 million to $1.9 million from $2.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to 2005. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in the outstanding debt balances.

Interest Income

Interest income for the three months
ended September 30, 2006 increased by $0.4 million to $0.7 million from $0.3 million compared to 2005, and increased by $1.0 million to $1.8 million from $0.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to 2005 due to
higher average balances of cash and short-term investments and higher interest rates earned on our cash and short-term investments.

Income Tax
Provision

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, no material provision or benefit for income taxes
was recorded, due to our recurring operating losses and the significant uncertainty regarding the realization of our net deferred tax assets, against which we have continued to record a full valuation allowance.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Historically, we
have financed our operations through sales of capital stock and borrowings under various debt arrangements. Following the completion of our merger with Tellium in November 2003, in which our common stock became publicly traded, we have financed and
expect to continue to finance our operations through a combination of our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, available credit facilities, and sales of equity and debt instruments, based on our operating requirements and
market conditions.

At September 30, 2006, cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, all of which are available to fund
current operations, were $65.8 million. This amount includes cash and cash equivalents of $51.3 million, as compared with $52.2 million at December 31, 2005. The decrease in cash and cash equivalents was attributable to net cash used in
operating activities of $14.3 million, offset by net cash provided by investing activities of $13.2 million.

Net cash used in operating
activities of $14.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 consisted of the net loss of $138.0 million before non-cash charges totaling $127.7 million and changes in operating assets and liabilities totaling $(4.0) million. The
most significant components of



26



---

##### Table of Contents

the changes in operating assets and liabilities were an increase in accounts receivable of $5.5 million and a decrease in accrued liabilities of $2.3 million
offset by an increase in accounts payable of $3.1 million. Net cash provided by investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 of $13.2 million consisted primarily of net maturities of short-term investments of $4.5 million
and proceeds on sale of assets of $10.7 million offset by the purchases of property and equipment of $2.0 million. Net cash used in financing activities included the repayment of certain debentures and other debt of $2.1 million, offset by proceeds
from the issuance of common stock and collection of notes receivable from officers.

As a result of the financial demands of major network
deployments and the difficulty in accessing capital markets, network service providers continue to request financing assistance from their suppliers. From time to time, we may provide or commit to extend credit or credit support to our customers.
This financing may include extending credit to customers or guaranteeing the indebtedness of customers to third parties. Depending upon market conditions, we may seek to factor these arrangements to financial institutions and investors to free up
our capital and reduce the amount of our financial commitments for such arrangements. Our ability to provide customer financing is limited and depends upon a number of factors, including our capital structure, the level of our available credit and
our ability to factor commitments to third parties. Any extension of financing to our customers will limit the capital that we have available for other uses. Currently, we do not have any significant customer financing related commitments. During
the nine months ended September 30, 2006, we sold $6.8 million of customer receivables to financial institutions on a non-recourse basis.

Our primary source of liquidity comes from our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments, which totaled $65.8 million at September 30, 2006, and our $25.0 million line of credit, under which $14.5 million was outstanding at
September 30, 2006, and an additional $10.3 million was committed as security for various letters of credit. Borrowings under the line of credit bear interest at the financial institutions prime rate or LIBOR plus 2.9%, at our election,
provided that the minimum interest rate is 4.0%. The interest rate was 8.25% at September 30, 2006. Our short-term investments are classified as available-for-sale and consist of securities that are readily convertible to cash, including
certificates of deposits, commercial paper and government securities, with original maturities at the date of acquisition ranging from 90 days to one year.

On February 24, 2006, we entered into an amendment to our existing revolving credit facility providing for a one year extension of the term of the existing facility and a voluntary decrease in the size of the
facility from $35 million to $25 million (the Amended Facility). Under the Amended Facility, we have the option of either borrowing funds at agreed upon rates of interest or selling specific accounts receivable to the financial
institution, on a limited recourse basis, at agreed upon discounts to the face amount of those accounts receivable, so long as the aggregate amount of outstanding borrowings and purchased accounts receivable does not exceed $25 million. The amounts
borrowed will bear interest, payable monthly, at a floating rate that, at our option, is either (1) the financial institutions prime rate, or (2) the sum of the LIBOR rate plus 2.9%; provided that in either case, the minimum interest
rate is 4.0%.

In March 2004, we filed a Form S-3 registration statement which allows us to sell, from time to time, up to $100 million of
our common stock or other securities. Although we may use this multi-purpose shelf registration to raise additional capital, there can be no certainty as to when or if we may offer any securities under the shelf registration or what the terms of any
such offering would be.

Our accounts receivable, while not considered a primary source of liquidity, represents a concentration of credit
risk because a significant portion of the accounts receivable balance at any point in time typically consists of a relatively small number of customer account balances. At September 30, 2006, two customers each represented 10% of our total
accounts receivable balance. Our fixed commitments for cash expenditures consist primarily of payments under operating leases, inventory purchase commitments, and payments of principal and interest for debt obligations. As a result of the Paradyne
acquisition in September 2005, we assumed a lease commitment of facilities in



27



---

##### Table of Contents

Largo, Florida. The term of the lease expires in June 2012 and had an estimated remaining obligation of approximately $27.2 million as of September 30,
2006. We intend to continue to occupy only a portion of these facilities and have recorded a liability of $5.0 million as of September 30, 2006, in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 95-3 (EITF 95-3), which we believe is
adequate to cover costs incurred to sublet the excess portion of these facilities. We do not currently have any material commitments for capital expenditures, or any other material commitments aside from operating leases for our facilities,
inventory purchase commitments and debt. We intend to fund our operations for the foreseeable future using our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments and liquidity available under our line of credit agreement.

Based on our current plans and business conditions, we believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments and available credit
facilities will be sufficient to satisfy our anticipated cash requirements for the foreseeable future.

Contractual Commitments and Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements

At September 30, 2006, our future contractual commitments by fiscal year were as follows (in thousands):



|                                     |  |       |        |      |   |                        |  |      |        |      |   |       |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |   |        |  |   |      
|------------------------------------ |  | ----- | ------ | ---- | - | ---------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | ---- | - | ----- |  | ---- | ----- | ---- | - | ----- |  | - | ------ |  | - | -----
|                                     |  |       |        |      |   | Payments due by period
|                                     |  | Total |        | 2006 |   | 2007                   |  | 2008 |        | 2009 |   | 2010  |  | 2011 |       | 2012
|Operating leases                     |  | $     | 29,041 |      | $ | 1,340                  |  | $    | 5,077  |      | $ | 4,616 |  | $    | 4,573 |      | $ | 4,478 |  | $ | 4,479  |  | $ | 4,478
|Line of credit                       |  |       | 14,500 |      |   | 14,500                 |  |      |       |      |   |      |  |      |      |      |   |      |  |   |       |  |   |     
|Debt                                 |  |       | 27,112 |      |   | 59                     |  |      | 7,672  |      |   | 280   |  |      | 310   |      |   | 337   |  |   | 18,454 |  |   |     
|Inventory purchase commitments       |  |       | 380    |      |   | 380                    |  |      |       |      |   |      |  |      |      |      |   |      |  |   |       |  |   |     
|                                     |  |       |        |      |   |                        |  |      |        |      |   |       |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |   |        |  |   |      
|Total future contractual commitments |  | $     | 71,033 |      | $ | 16,279                 |  | $    | 12,749 |      | $ | 4,896 |  | $    | 4,883 |      | $ | 4,815 |  | $ | 22,933 |  | $ | 4,478
|                                     |  |       |        |      |   |                        |  |      |        |      |   |       |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |   |        |  |   |      

The operating lease amounts shown above represent off-balance sheet arrangements before considering
the $5.0 million liability already recorded on our balance sheet. For operating lease commitments, a liability is generally not recorded on our balance sheet unless the facility represents an excess facility for which an estimate of the facility
exit costs has been recorded on our balance sheet. Payments made under operating leases will be treated as rent expense for the facilities currently being utilized. The debt and line of credit obligations have been recorded on our balance sheet. The
debt obligation amounts shown above represent the scheduled principal repayments and estimated contract maintenance payments, but not the associated interest payments which may vary based on changes in market interest rates. At September 30,
2006, the interest rate on our outstanding debt obligations ranged from 7.5% to 8.25%. Inventory purchase commitments represent the amount of excess inventory purchase commitments that have been recorded on our balance sheet at September 30,
2006.

As of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, we had $10.3 million and $5.4 million, respectively, committed as security
under our line of credit.



28



---

##### Table of Contents

|Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|------- | ----------------------------------------------------------

Cash, Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments

Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments consisted of the
following as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 (in thousands):



|                          |  |                    |        |                  |   |       
|------------------------- |  | ------------------ | ------ | ---------------- | - | ------
|                          |  | September 30, 2006 |        | December 31,2005
|Cash and cash equivalents |  | $                  | 51,314 |                  | $ | 52,166
|Short-term investments    |  |                    | 14,489 |                  |   | 18,974
|                          |  |                    |        |                  |   |       
|                          |  | $                  | 65,803 |                  | $ | 71,140
|                          |  |                    |        |                  |   |       

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments which potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, short term investments and accounts receivable. Cash and cash equivalents consist
principally of demand deposit and money market accounts, commercial paper, and debt securities of domestic municipalities with credit ratings of AA or better. Cash and cash equivalents and short term investments are principally held with various
domestic financial institutions with high-credit standing. As of September 30, 2006, two customers each represented 10% of our total accounts receivable balance.

Interest Rate Risk

Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to
our investment portfolio and long-term debt. We do not use derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio. We do not hold financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. We manage our interest rate risk by maintaining an
investment portfolio primarily consisting of debt instruments of high credit quality and relatively short average maturities. Under our investment policy, short-term investments have a maximum maturity of one year from the date of acquisition, and
the average maturity of the portfolio cannot exceed six months. Due to the relatively short maturity of the portfolio, a 10% increase in market interest rates at September 30, 2006 would decrease the fair value of the portfolio by less than
$0.1 million.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

We transact business in various foreign countries. Substantially all of our assets are located in the United States. We have sales operations throughout Europe, Asia, the Middle East and Latin America. We are exposed to foreign currency
exchange rate risk associated with foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities, primarily inter-company receivables and payables. Accordingly, our operating results are exposed to changes in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and those
currencies. During 2006 and 2005, we did not hedge any of our foreign currency exposure.

We have performed sensitivity analyses as of
September 30, 2006 using a modeling technique that measures the change in the fair values arising from a hypothetical 10% adverse movement in the levels of foreign currency exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar, with all other variables
held constant. The sensitivity analyses indicated that a hypothetical 10% adverse movement in foreign currency exchange rates would result in a foreign exchange loss of $1.0 million at September 30, 2006. This sensitivity analysis assumes
a parallel adverse shift in foreign currency exchange rates, which do not always move in the same direction. Actual results may differ materially.



29



---

##### Table of Contents

|Item 4. | Controls and Procedures
|------- | -----------------------

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of
the period covered by this report. The controls evaluation was done under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer. Based upon this evaluation, our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, subject to the limitations noted in this Part I, Item 4, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide
reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC, and that material information
relating to Zhone and its consolidated subsidiaries is made known to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, particularly during the period when our periodic reports are being prepared.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls

Our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our
internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control systems objectives will
be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the
realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by
management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under
all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance
with policies or procedures.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION



|Item 1. | Legal Proceedings
|------- | -----------------

As a result of our acquisitions
of Tellium and Paradyne, we became involved in various legal proceedings, claims and litigation, including those identified below, relating to the operations of Tellium and Paradyne prior to our acquisition of these entities.

Tellium Matters

On various
dates between approximately December 10, 2002 and February 27, 2003, numerous class action securities complaints were filed against Tellium in the United States District Court for the



30



---

##### Table of Contents

District of New Jersey. On May 19, 2003, a consolidated amended complaint representing all of the actions was filed. The complaint alleges, among other
things, that Tellium and its then-current directors and executive officers, and its underwriters, violated the Securities Act of 1933 by making false and misleading statements or omissions in its registration statement prospectus relating to the
securities offered in the initial public offering. The complaint further alleges that these parties violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by acting recklessly or intentionally in making the alleged misstatements and/or omissions in connection
with the sale of Tellium stock. The complaint seeks damages in an unspecified amount, including compensatory damages, costs and expenses incurred in connection with the actions and equitable relief as may be permitted by law or equity. On
March 31, 2004, the court granted Telliums and the underwriters motions to dismiss the complaint and allowed the plaintiffs to file a further amended complaint. On May 14, 2004, the plaintiffs filed a second consolidated and
amended complaint. On June 25, 2004, Zhone, as Telliums successor-in-interest, and the underwriters again moved to dismiss the complaint. On June 30, 2005, the court dismissed with prejudice the plaintiffs claims under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, but denied the motions to dismiss with respect to the plaintiffs claims under the Securities Act of 1933. The plaintiffs moved for reconsideration of that portion of the courts June 30, 2005 decision
dismissing their claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. On August 26, 2005, the court denied the plaintiffs motion for reconsideration. The case proceeded to discovery. On or about March 10, 2006, the parties reached an
agreement in principle to settle the case. The court issued an order preliminarily approving the settlement on or about May 30, 2006. The court provided its final approval of the settlement and dismissal of the plaintiffs claims in an
order and final judgment dated September 7, 2006. The settlement had no material impact to the Companys statement of operations.

The Denver, Colorado regional office of the SEC is conducting two investigations titled In the Matter of Qwest Communications International Inc.and In the Matter of Issuers Related to Qwest. The first of these investigations
does not appear to involve any allegation of wrongful conduct on the part of Tellium. In connection with the second investigation, the SEC is examining various transactions and business relationships involving Qwest and eleven companies having a
vendor relationship with Qwest, including Tellium. Zhone, as Telliums successor-in-interest, has not had any substantive communications with the SEC regarding the investigation since 2003.

In addition, the United States Attorney in Denver is conducting an investigation involving Qwest, including Qwests relationships with certain of its
vendors, including Tellium. In connection with that investigation, the U.S. Attorney has sought documents and information from Tellium and has sought interviews and/or grand jury testimony from persons associated or formerly associated with Tellium,
including certain of its officers. The U.S. Attorney has indicated that neither Tellium nor any of our current or former officers or employees is a target of the investigation.

Paradyne Matters

A purported
stockholder class action complaint was filed in December 2001 in the United States District Court in the Southern District of New York against Paradyne, Paradynes then-current directors and executive officers, and each of the underwriters (the
Underwriter Defendants) who participated in Paradynes initial public offering and follow-on offering (collectively, the Paradyne Offerings). The complaint alleges that, in connection with the Paradyne Offerings, the
Underwriter Defendants charged excessive commissions, inflated transaction fees not disclosed in the applicable registration statements and allocated shares of the Paradyne Offerings to favored customers in exchange for purported promises by such
customers to purchase additional shares in the aftermarket, thereby allegedly inflating the market price for the Paradyne Offerings. The complaint seeks damages in an unspecified amount for the purported class for the losses suffered during the
class period. This action has been consolidated with hundreds of other securities class actions commenced against more than 300 companies (collectively, the Issuer Defendants) and approximately 40 investment banks in which the plaintiffs
make substantially similar allegations as those made against Paradyne with respect to the initial public offerings and/or follow-on offerings at issue in those other cases. All of



31



---

##### Table of Contents

these actions have been consolidated under the caption In re: Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation(the IPO Actions). In 2003,
the Issuer Defendants participated in a global settlement among the plaintiffs and the insurance companies that provided directors and officers insurance coverage to the Issuer Defendants. The settlement agreements provide for the Issuer
Defendants (including Paradyne) to be fully released and dismissed from the IPO Actions. Under the terms of the settlement agreements, Paradyne is not required to make any cash payment to the plaintiffs. Although the court preliminarily approved the
settlement agreements, the preliminary approval is subject to a future final settlement order, after notice of settlement has been provided to class members and they have been afforded the opportunity to oppose or opt out of the settlement. There
can be no assurance that these conditions for final settlement will be satisfied.

Other Matters

We are subject to other legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these matters is
currently not determinable, management does not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations. However, litigation is subject to inherent
uncertainties, and unfavorable rulings could occur. If an unfavorable ruling were to occur, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on the results of operations of the period in which the ruling occurs, or future periods.



|Item 1A. | Risk Factors
|-------- | ------------

In addition to the other information
set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, which could materially affect our business,
financial condition or future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may
materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.



|Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|------- | -----------------------------------------------------------

Not applicable.



|Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities
|------- | -------------------------------

Not applicable.



|Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|------- | ---------------------------------------------------

Not applicable.



|Item 5. | Other Information
|------- | -----------------

Not applicable.



|Item 6. | Exhibits
|------- | --------

The Exhibit Index on page 34 is
incorporated herein by reference as the list of exhibits required as part of this report.



32



---

##### Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



|                       |  |  |  |                          |  |                    |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------ |  | ------------------ |  | -----------------------
|                       |  |  |  | ZHONE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: November 6, 2006 |  |  |  | By:                      |  | /s/ Morteza Ejabat
|                       |  |  |  |                          |  | Name:              |  | Morteza Ejabat         
|                       |  |  |  |                          |  | Title:             |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                       |  |  |  |                          |  |                    |  |                        
|                       |  |  | 
|                       |  |  |  | By:                      |  | /s/ Kirk Misaka   
|                       |  |  |  |                          |  | Name:              |  | Kirk Misaka            
|                       |  |  |  |                          |  | Title:             |  | Chief Financial Officer



33



---

##### Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX



|               |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|-------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Exhibit Number |  | Description                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|10.1           |  | Form of Stock Option Agreement for the Zhone Technologies, Inc. Amended and Restated 2001 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of registrants Form 8-K filed
on September 1, 2006)
|               | 
|31.1           |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)                                                                                                                                 
|               | 
|31.2           |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)                                                                                                                                 
|               | 
|32.1           |  | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                             



34