alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §410nnn–2. Administration

The Secretary, acting through the Director of the National Park Service, shall manage the historical park in accordance with this subchapter and the provisions of law generally applicable to the National Park System, including the Act of August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535; 16 U.S.C. 1 et seq.),1 and the Act of August 21, 1935 (49 Stat. 666).1 The Secretary shall protect, manage, and administer the historical park for the purposes of preserving and interpreting the cultural and natural resources of the historical park and providing for the public understanding and appreciation of the historical park in such a manner as to perpetuate these qualities and values for future generations.

(Pub. L. 102–304, §4, June 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 257; Pub. L. 111–11, title VII, §7113(a)(3)(C), Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1202.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Act of August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535; 16 U.S.C. 1 et seq.), referred to in text, is act Aug. 25, 1916, ch. 408, 39 Stat. 535, known as the National Park Service Organic Act, which enacted sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 of this title and provisions set out as a note under section 100101 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs. Sections 1 to 4 of the Act were repealed and restated as section 1865(a) of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and section 100101(a), chapter 1003, and sections 100751(a), 100752, 100753, and 102101 of Title 54 by Pub. L. 113–287, §§3, 4(a)(1), 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3094, 3260, 3272. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables. For disposition of former sections of this title, see Disposition Table preceding section 100101 of Title 54.

The Act of August 21, 1935 (49 Stat. 666), referred to in text, is act Aug. 21, 1935, ch. 593, 49 Stat. 666, known as the Historic Sites Act of 1935 and also as the Historic Sites, Buildings, and Antiquities Act, which enacted sections 461 to 467 of this title. The Act was repealed and restated as section 1866(a) of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and sections 102303 and 102304 and chapter 3201 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs, by Pub. L. 113–287, §§3, 4(a)(1), 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3094, 3260, 3272. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables. For disposition of former sections of this title, see Disposition Table preceding section 100101 of Title 54.

#### Amendments

2009—Pub. L. 111–11 substituted "historical park" for "historic site" wherever appearing.

1 See References in Text note below.
#### § 36.210 Smoking.

This part does not preclude the prohibition of, or the imposition of restrictions on, smoking in places of public accommodation.
#### § 61.8 Classified proposals.

If an environmental document includes classified matter, a version containing only unclassified material shall be prepared unless the head of the office, board, bureau or division determines that preparation of an unclassified version is not feasible.
#### § 51.31 Communications concerning voting suits.

Individuals and groups are urged to notify the Chief, Voting Section, Civil Rights Division, of litigation concerning voting in jurisdictions subject to the requirement of section 5.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 THAT WERE
FILED WITH THE COMPANY'S REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001101372
<NAME> UNIMANN, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              OCT-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                         (1)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
The following is an amended Exhibit A to the Services Agreement between Allianz
Life Insurance Company of North America, Preferred Life Insurance Company of New
York and Prudential Investment Management Services, LLC, dated December 15,
2000.


                                    EXHIBIT A
                                      FUNDS

The Prudential Series Fund, Inc.
     SP Jennison International Growth Portfolio
     SP Strategic Partners Focused Growth Portfolio
Prudential Series Fund, Inc. - Jennison 20/20 Focus Portfolio

Agreed to and Accepted by:

BY:   /S/ SUZANNE J.PEPIN
  -------------------------------
NAME:     SUZANNE J.PEPIN
  -------------------------------
TITLE:    SR. VP. AND SECRETARY
  -------------------------------
DATE:
  -------------------------------

<PAGE>
The following is an amended Exhibit B/Schedule A to the Services Agreement
between Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America, Preferred Life
Insurance Company of New York and Prudential Investment Management Services,
LLC, dated December 15, 2000.

                                    EXHIBIT B

                                  FEE SCHEDULE

                                   SCHEDULE A
        With respect to Separate Accounts invested in the Funds, Allianz shall
receive the compensation described below. Such fee shall accrue daily and SHALL
be paid to Allianz monthly. PIMS shall not pay any fees with respect to Separate
Accounts invested in a Fund in which the average balance is less than $1,000. In
addition, PIMS shall withhold payment until the total cumulative compensation
payable under the Agreement is equal to at least $1,000.


Fund                                             Compensation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Prudential Series Fund, Inc.
     SP Jennison International Growth           .25% of average daily net assets
        Portfolio-Class II Shares
     SP Strategic Partners Focused Growth       .25% of average daily net assets
        Portfolio-Class II Shares
Prudential Series Fund, Inc. - Jennison 20/20   .25% of average daily net assets
        Focus Portfolio
#### § 545.10 Purpose and scope.

The Bureau of Prisons encourages each sentenced inmate to meet his or her legitimate financial obligations. As part of the initial classification process, staff will assist the inmate in developing a financial plan for meeting those obligations, and at subsequent program reviews, staff shall consider the inmate's efforts to fulfill those obligations as indicative of that individual's acceptance and demonstrated level of responsibility. The provisions of this rule apply to all inmates in federal facilities, except: Study and observation cases, pretrial detainees, and inmates in holdover status pending designation.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                Exhibit 10(c)(c)

                  SECOND AMENDMENT TO STOCKHOLDERS' AGREEMENT


         THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO STOCKHOLDERS' AGREEMENT is entered into this
22nd day of June, 1995, by and among CHARLES A. HAYES, MAURICE FISHMAN, GEORGE
GREENBERG (Messrs. Hayes, Fishman and Greenberg being collectively hereinafter
referred to as the "Stockholders'), and GUILFORD MILLS, INC., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company").

                                  WITNESSETH:


         WHEREAS, the Stockholders and the Company entered into a Stockholders'
Agreement, dated June 22, 1990, as amended, pursuant to which the Company has a
right of first refusal in the event any Stockholder transfers (other than by
gift) his shares of Company common stock (the "1990 Stockholders' Agreement);
and

         WHEREAS, the Stockholders and the Company believe that it is desirable
to amend the 1990 Stockholders' Agreement as more fully set forth below.

         NOW, THEREFORE,   in consideration of the covenants and conditions
contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as
follows:

         1.      Section 1(d) of the 1990 Stockholders' Agreement is hereby
deleted in its entirety and the following section is inserted in its place:

                 (d) upon June 27, 1997.

         2.      Except as other wise expressly set forth above, the 1990
Stockholders' Agreement remains unmodified and in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Second Amendment as
of the day and year first above written.



   GUILFORD MILLS, INC.                          STOCKHOLDERS:

   By:__________________________________         _______________________________
       Terrence E. Geremski                       Charles A. Hayes
       Vice President, Chief Financial
       Officer and Treasurer                   
                                                 _______________________________
                                                  Maurice Fishman


                                                 _______________________________
                                                  George Greenberg
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6232** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. SHAWN KEITH HARRIS , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Statesville
. Richard L. Voorhees , District Judge. ( 5:02

- cr - 00005

- RLV

- 4 )

Submitted : September 17, 2012 Decided: October 2, 2012

Before DIAZ, FLOYD, and THAC KER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Shawn Keith Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Shawn Keith Harris appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Harris , No. 5:02

- cr - 00005

- RLV

- 4 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 24, 2012) . We deny the motion for transcript at the government's expense and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mat erials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 544.43 Incentives.

The Warden or designee shall establish a system of incentives to encourage an inmate to meet the mandatory ESL program requirements.
### §40. Additions to park; entry under other acts

The President of the United States is authorized, in his discretion, to add by Executive proclamation to Yellowstone National Park any or all of the lands within a certain territory or tract in township 9 south, ranges 7 and 8 east, Montana principal meridian, to wit: Beginning at a point on the north line of said Yellowstone National Park where said line crosses the divide between Reese Creek and Mol Heron Creek, thence northeasterly along said divide to the junction of said divide with the branch divide north and west of Reese Creek; thence along said branch divide in a northeasterly and easterly direction around the drainage of Reese Creek, to the Yellowstone River; thence southerly and southeasterly along the west bank of the Yellowstone River to the line marking the western limits of the town of Gardiner, Montana; thence south on said town limits line to the northern boundary of Yellowstone National Park; thence west along the north boundary of Yellowstone National Park to the point of beginning, which are unappropriated lands of the United States or which may be acquired by the United States under the provisions of sections 37 to 40 of this title, within the territory described in this section, subject, however, to all valid existing claims and to reservations such as are authorized by section 39 of this title; but, with the exception of valid existing claims, no land so added to Yellowstone National Park shall be subject to entry under the mining laws of the United States: Provided, That the Secretary of the Interior for such lands as are added to Yellowstone National Park may provide by rules and regulations for the management and use of the added lands as may in his discretion be necessary to accomplish the purposes of sections 37 to 40 of this title: And provided further, That the lands of the United States acquired by donation or purchase within the area described in section 37 of this title shall not be subject to location and entry under the mining laws of the United States nor the Act of June 11, 1906, authorizing homestead entries in national forests.

(May 26, 1926, ch. 399, §6, 44 Stat. 656.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of June 11, 1906, referred to in text, means act June 11, 1906, ch. 3074, 34 Stat. 233, which was classified to sections 506 to 508 and 509 of this title, and was repealed by Pub. L. 87–869, §4, Oct. 23, 1962, 76 Stat. 1157.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2635

VIRGINIA MCDONALD,

Petitioner,

versus

DANTE COAL COMPANY (Badger Coal Company);

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(95-2029-BLA)

Submitted: August 18, 1998 Decided: January 26, 1999

Before WIDENER and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Daniel Blizzard, II, SHAFFER & SHAFFER, Madison, West Virginia, for Petitioner. William Steele Mattingly, JACKSON & KELLY,

Morgantown, West Virginia; Patricia May Nece, J. Matthew McCracken,

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for

Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Virginia McDonald seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s

decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial

of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West

1986 & Supp. 1997). Our review of the record discloses that the

Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

Board. McDonald v. Dante Coal Company, BRB No. 95-2029-BLA (B.R.B.

Sept. 26, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Email Communication with Rick Stevens, OST Biosolids Coordinator & Kimberly Bartell, 

ERG

From: Bartell, Kimberly

To: Stevens, Richard

Sent: 6/13/13 3:59 PM

Subject: RE: Follow up on TNSSS

Hi Rick,

Thank you for getting back to me. I will be in touch later this month to set up a review schedule 

for the biosolids section in July.

Thanks again,

Kimberly

From: Stevens, Richard, Stevens.Rick@epa.gov

To: Bartell, Kimberly

Sent: 6/13/13 3:48 PM

Subject: RE: Follow up on TNSSS

Hi Kimberly,

We are currently evaluating TNSSS pollutants. There are no conclusions at this time as some of 

the risk evaluations are undergoing internal review, with peer review to follow. Risk evaluations 

for most TNSSS pollutants will take place at a later date.

I don't believe you can consider POTWs confidential information; you should be fine to publish.

Yes, I will be available to review the biosolids section in July.

Thanks,

Rick Stevens

From: Bartell, Kimberly

To: Stevens, Richard

Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 2:30 PM

Subject: Follow up on TNSSS

Rick,

As I stated in my message to you, I work for Eastern Research Group and we have assisted EPA 

with the Effluent Guideline Annual Review each year with Bill Swietlik. In January 2012, Ellie 

Codding from ERG contacted you about a biosolids analysis we were conducting as part of the 

annual review and you provided a list of facilities that were sampled as part of the Targeted 

National Sewage Sludge Survey. 
We are now finalizing the review and I have the following questions for you:

1. Currently on the TNSSS webpage it states that EPA plans to evaluate the pollutants identified 

by the survey as being present in sewage sludge and conduct an exposure and hazard 

assessment for these pollutants if sufficient data are available. Are there any updates to this plan? 

If so, have any conclusions been reached?

2. In our biosolids analysis section we have a table that lists the TNSSS-sampled POTWs that 

receive wastewater from industrial facilities reporting to the Toxic Release Inventory. This table 

includes the POTWs names and states where they are located. Before publication, we wanted to 

check with you about the confidentiality of the TNSSS-sampled POTW names. Is it ok to include 

this table in the report?

3. Finally, Bill Swietlik would like you to review our biosolids analysis section before it is 

finalized. Would you be available in early July to review this section? 

Please call if it would be easier to discuss these questions on the phone, my number is 517-515-

1721. 

Thank you,

Kimberly

----------------------------------------

Kimberly D. Bartell

Environmental Engineer

Eastern Research Group, Inc. 

kimberly.bartell@erg.com

Phone: 517-515-1721
### SERVED: February 16, 2017
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS ·

## OEPI\RTM**~~l PJN.** 

In The Matter Of:
Peter Hantz Company
Respondent 

### WASHINGTON DC 

## TRAHSP ' ) ) ) ) ) ) 

## ta\1 FEB l 1 P J 

## 3\ nnr.KE1

## OP~RA1\0NS. DocketNo. FAA-2{'J"10-4268

Case No. 2012S0700041

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOREXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINANT'S MOTION FORPARTIAL SUMMARYJUDGMENT On July 11, 2016, the parties filed a proposedjoint litigation schedule. On July 27, 2016, the undersignedjudge issued an Order Adopting Litigation Schedule, which required, inter alia, that responses to prehearing motions be filed within 21 days ofthe date ofservice ofthe motion. On January 31, 2017, the Complainant filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgement. On February 15, 2017, the Respondent filed an unopposed request to extend the deadline for. filing

### a response to Complainant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment to March 15, 2017, in order to allow further settlement discussions.
Pursuant to 14 C.P.R.§§ 13.205(a)(6) and 13.213(b), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Respondent's unopposed request is granted. 2. The Respondent's response to the Complainant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment shall be filed by March 15, 2017.

Attachment: Service List DOUGLAS M. RAW ALD Administrative Law Judge

### SERVICE LIST -BYU.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1



### ONE COPY
Timothy I. McCulloch, Respondent's Counsel HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP 2375 E. Camelback Rd. Suite 750 Phoenix, AZ 85016 TEL: 602-631-4400 FAX: 602-631-4404 Ryan Landers, Complainant's Counsel Enforcement Division, Southern Team Federal Aviation Administration, Southern Region 1701 Columbia Avenue College Park, GA 30337 TEL: 404-305-5200 FAX: 404-305-5223 The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2016-4268 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was byU.S. Mail, For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
### §213. Execution of instruments necessary to carry out purposes of gift

The President of the United States of America and the Secretary of War are authorized to execute, in the name of the United States of America, such instrument or instruments as may be or may become necessary to comply with or carry out the terms and conditions of such gift or gifts and to secure the full benefit therefrom.

(July 17, 1916, ch. 247, §3, 39 Stat. 386; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, enacted "Title 10, Armed Forces" which in sections 3010 to 3013 continued military Department of the Army under administrative supervision of a Secretary of the Army.