alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
 SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30,
2009, of AmREIT; and2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report.3.
    
    [INTENTIONALLY OMITTED]4.
    
    [INTENTIONALLY OMITTED]5.
    
    [INTENTIONALLY OMITTED]
 Date: April 3, 2009
    /s/ H. Kerr TaylorH. Kerr TaylorPresident and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Stone  Field  Management
Company,  on Form 10- QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the
undersigned, B. Stephen Bailey, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of White Horse Resources, Inc.,
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"),  the undersigned,  B.
Stephen Bailey,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge  and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 10.15

                    THIRD AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT

This THIRD AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT, dated this 30th day of September,
2003, by and between TC Albuquerque Rose Interests, LLC and TC Albuquerque
Rabina Interests, LLC ("Landlord") and New Mexico Software ("Tenant") with
reference to the following facts:

                                WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant entered into a Lease Agreement dated August 4,
1999 and a First Amendment to Lease dated May 17, 2000, and a Second
Amendment to Lease dated September 23, 2003, pursuant to which Tenant
leased from Landlord 6,002 rentable sf at 5041 Indian School Rd NE,
Albuquerque, New Mexico ("the Premises"); and

WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Lease as set forth below,

NOW THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, Landlord and Tenant agree as follows:

1.   STOCK:  Tenant has agreed to immediately transfer 365,000 shares of
New Mexico Software common stock ("NMXS") with a negotiated value of $0.09
per share to Landlord as payment for the back rent amount of $29,352 as
promised in the attached Exhibit A Promissory Note plus $3,500 in
anticipated brokerage fees. Tenant will immediately commence and use best
efforts to accomplish all necessary actions to effectuate registration of
the shares with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to remove all
legends and restrictions on the shares.  Landlord, at Landlord's sole and
exclusive option, on the earlier of February 2004 or when the stock becomes
fully and freely tradable in the market place with no restrictions or
encumbrances attached thereto, may choose to sell the stock or may chose to
collect on the Promissory Note in full as stated and return the stock to
New Mexico Software.  Should the Landlord choose to sell the stock, the
Landlord agrees to sell the stock in an orderly manner, which shall not
exceed 10,000 shares per day.

2.   OTHER CONDITIONS: Except as revised by the First Amendment to Lease,
Second Amendment to Lease and this Third Amendment to Lease, the Lease
continues unchanged, in full force and effect. Capitalized terms not
otherwise defined herein retain the definition afforded them in the Lease.

THE PARTIES HERETO have executed this Third Amendment as of the day and
year last below written.

LANDLORD
TC Albuquerque Rose Interests, LLC
BY:  /s/ Theresa Bell
Its:
date:

LANDLORD
TC Albuquerque Rabina Interests, LLC
BY:  /s/ Theresa Bell
Its:
date:

TENANT
New Mexico Software
By:  /s/ Richard Govatski
Its:  CEO

By:  /s/ John E.  Handley
Its:  Director
# C_2011130EN.01001201.xml

| 30.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/12

---

Appeal brought on 18 February 2011 by Frucona Košice a.s. against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 7 December 2010 in Case T-11/07: Frucona Košice a.s. v European Commission, St. Nicolaus — trade a.s.

(Case C-73/11 P)

2011/C 130/22

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Frucona Košice a.s. (represented by: P. Lasok QC, J. Holmes, Barrister, B. Hartnett, Barrister, O. Geiss, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, St. Nicolaus — trade a.s.

Other parties to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | set aside the General Court’s decision of 7 December 2010 in Case T-11/07 as it relates to the fourth and sixth pleas in the Appellant’s Application before the General Court; |
| --- | --- |

1.

set aside the General Court’s decision of 7 December 2010 in Case T-11/07 as it relates to the fourth and sixth pleas in the Appellant’s Application before the General Court;

| 2. | uphold those pleas as well-founded; |
| --- | --- |

2.

uphold those pleas as well-founded;

| 3. | refer the case back to the General Court so that it can decide upon the Appellant’s fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth and ninth pleas as they relate to the tax execution procedure; and |
| --- | --- |

3.

refer the case back to the General Court so that it can decide upon the Appellant’s fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth and ninth pleas as they relate to the tax execution procedure; and

| 4. | order the Commission to pay the Appellant’s costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

order the Commission to pay the Appellant’s costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on the following two pleas.

1.   First plea: the General Court failed to assess the Commission’s application of the private creditor test against the correct legal standard.

the General Court failed to assess the Commission’s application of the private creditor test against the correct legal standard.

2.   Second plea: the General Court impermissibly sought to substitute its own reasoning for that of the Commission as regards the application of the private creditor test; and/or assessed the existing evidence relevant to that test in a manner that was manifestly incorrect, thereby distorting the clear sense of the evidence.

the General Court impermissibly sought to substitute its own reasoning for that of the Commission as regards the application of the private creditor test; and/or assessed the existing evidence relevant to that test in a manner that was manifestly incorrect, thereby distorting the clear sense of the evidence.

---
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

In Re: 

Jennifer Christine Kidd Case # 19-10412-KHK 

REPORT OF DEPOSIT OF UNCLAIMED FUNDS 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3011 and 11 U.S.C. 347, the trustee 

herein submits a check, or checks, payable to the “Clerk, United States Bankruptcy Court” 

representing unclaimed funds to be deposited by the Clerk of the Court into the Treasury 

of the United States. Said funds are subject to withdrawal as provided by 28 U.S.C. 2042 

and shall not escheat under any state law. Unclaimed funds represent the dividend(s) due 

and payable to the entity identified as the original payee on the face of the enclosed 

check(s). 

PAYEE 

JENNIFER CHRISTINE KIDD 

1443 Duke Street 

Alexandria, VA 22314 

AMOUNT 

$2,769.27 

Dated: October 14, 2020 __/s/Thomas P. Gorman ___________ 

Thomas P. Gorman 

300 North Washington Street, Ste. 400 

Alexandria, VA 22314 

(703) 836-2226 

VSB#26421 

Case 19-10412-KHK Doc 62 Filed 10/14/20 Entered 10/14/20 12:49:57 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
Editorial Note on Part 0
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

§ 0.122 Office on Violence Against Women. ( a ) The Director, Office on Violence Against Women, under the general authority of the Attorney General, shall: ( 1 ) Exercise the powers and perform the duties and functions described in section 402(3) of title IV of the 21st Century Department of Justice Appropriations Authorization Act (Pub. L. 107-273); and
( 2 ) Perform such other duties and functions relating to such duties as may be authorized by law or assigned or delegated by the Attorney General, consistent with constitutional limits on the Federal Government's authority to act in this area.
( b ) Departmental regulations set forth in 28 CFR part 61, Appendix D, applicable to the Office of Justice Programs, shall apply with equal force and effect to the Office on Violence Against Women, with references to the Office of Justice Assistance, Research and Statistics, and its components, in such regulations deemed to refer to the Office on Violence Against Women, as appropriate.
( c ) Departmental regulations set forth in part 18 of this title, shall apply with equal force and effect to grant programs administered by the Office on Violence Against Women, with references to the Office of Justice Programs and its components in such regulations deemed to refer to the Office on Violence Against Women, as appropriate.
[Order No. 2811-2006, 71 FR 19827, Apr. 18, 2006, as amended at 80 FR 1006, Jan. 8, 2015]
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of NorAm Capital Holdings, Inc. (Registrant) for the annual period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Daniel M. Cofall, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|    |  |                                                                                                                       
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) |  | This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



|    |  |                                                                                                                                                          
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) |  | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Registrant.











|                        |                                                                       |                      | 
|----------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------- | 
|Date: December 29, 2008 | By:                                                                   | /s/ Daniel M. Cofall | 
|                        | Daniel M. Cofall
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
#### § 550.52 Non-residential drug abuse treatment services.

All institutions must have non-residential drug abuse treatment services, provided through the institution's Psychology Services department. These services are available to inmates who voluntarily decide to participate.
Order entered October 16, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00725-CR

CRAIG LADARIUS THOMAS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F11-70706-T

ORDER

The Court has before it appellant’s October 6, 2014 motion to abate appeal. In the 

motion, counsel asserts that the clerk’s record may be incomplete and that there may be other 

portions of the reporter’s record not filed. Counsel does not identify what is missing from the 

record. Moreover, we note that counsel has been granted two previous extensions of time, 

totaling sixty days, to file his brief. In neither of his previous extension requests did counsel 

identify any problems with the record. Accordingly, we DENY the October 6, 2014 motion to 

abate regarding the clerk’s record.

We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has 

not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and 

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether 
appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the 

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is 

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which 

may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 29, 2019

p0326 

# Order

Clerk March 29, 2019

158369 & (27)(31)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 158369

COA: 342643

Jackson CC: 13

- 003860

- FC

RANDY SCOTT STEVENS

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motions to supplement are G RANTED. The

application for leave to appeal the August 24, 2018 order of the Court of Appeals is

considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of

establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion to rem and is

DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                              ADZONE RESEARCH, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of AdZone Research, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles Cardona, Chief
Executive  Officer,  Principal  Accounting  Officer and Director of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to AdZone Research,  Inc. and will be retained by AdZone Research, Inc.
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.

Date: August 20, 2004

                                        /s/ Charles Cardona
                                        -------------------
                                        Name: Charles Cardona
                                        Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                        and Principal Accounting Officer
### §3457. Repealed. Pub. L. 110–234, title II, §2805(d), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1089, and Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title II, §2805(d), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1817

Section, Pub. L. 97–98, title XV, §1534, as added Pub. L. 107–171, title II, §2504, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 273, related to evaluation of program established under this subchapter and submission of report not later than June 30, 2005.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 repealed this section. Pub. L. 110–234 was repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3457, Pub. L. 97–98, title XV, §1534, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1340, related to the Resource Conservation and Development Policy Board, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 107–171.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as an Effective Date note under section 8701 of Title 7, Agriculture.
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 10-Q/A
 (Amendment No. 1)
 QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2005
 Commission file No. 000-32837
 UNITED SURGICAL PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
  Delaware
(State of Incorporation)
    
    75-2749762
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)15305 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1600
Addison, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    75001
(Zip Code)
 (972) 713-3500
 þ  ̈
 þ  ̈
 o o
 Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of August 31, 2005
    
    
    44,157,126




---



##### 



EXPLANATORY NOTE
   II-1




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  United Surgical Partners International, Inc.By:
    /s/ Mark A. KopserMark A. KopserSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer  By:
    /s/ John J. WellikJohn J. WellikSenior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer  INDEX TO EXHIBITS
 ExhibitNumber
    
    
    
    Description31.1
    
    *
    
    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 200231.2
    
    *
    
    Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 *
    
    Filed herewith. II-2
Exhibit 32.1





CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Gyrodyne Company of America, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Stephen V. Maroney, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.




Date: March 30, 2011
By:
/s/ Stephen V. MaroneyStephen V. Maroney,President and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 540.52 Penalty for violation of visiting regulations.

Any act or effort to violate the visiting guidelines of an institution may result in disciplinary action against the inmate, which may include the denial of future visits, possibly over an extended period of time. Moreover, criminal prosecution may be initiated against the visitor, the inmate, or both, in the case of criminal violations.
### §1868. Herring study

#### (a) In general

The Secretary may conduct a cooperative research program to study the issues of abundance, distribution and the role of herring as forage fish for other commercially important fish stocks in the Northwest Atlantic, and the potential for local scale depletion from herring harvesting and how it relates to other fisheries in the Northwest Atlantic. In planning, designing, and implementing this program, the Secretary shall engage multiple fisheries sectors and stakeholder groups concerned with herring management.

#### (b) Report

The Secretary shall present the final results of this study to Congress within 3 months following the completion of the study, and an interim report at the end of fiscal year 2008.

#### (c) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated $2,000,000 for fiscal year 2007 through fiscal year 2009 to conduct this study.

(Pub. L. 94–265, title III, §319, as added Pub. L. 109–479, title II, §205, Jan. 12, 2007, 120 Stat. 3615.)
#### § 345.62 Inmate accident compensation.

An inmate worker shall be paid lost-time wages while hospitalized or confined to quarters due to work-related injuries (including occupational disease or illnesses directly caused by the worker's job assignments) as specified by the Inmate Accident Compensation Program (28 CFR part 301).
#### § 523.34 How can I challenge DCEGT award decisions?

You can use the Administrative Remedy Program, 28 CFR 542.10 through 542.19, to challenge Bureau of Prisons decisions regarding DCEGT.