alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 513.11 Procedures for requesting a FBI identification record or a NCIC/III record. ( a ) *FBI identification record.* ( 1 ) An inmate may request a copy of his or her current FBI identification record directly from the FBI by following the procedure outlined in 28 CFR 16.30 through 16.34. ( i ) Bureau of Prisons staff shall assist the inmate to obtain the fingerprint impressions required to be submitted with such an application.
( ii ) The inmate may direct that funds be withdrawn from his or her institution account to pay the applicable fee.
( 2 ) An inmate may request a copy of his or her FBI identification record from institution staff. ( i ) If the requested FBI identification record is in the inmate's institution file, staff shall provide the inmate with a copy.
( ii ) If the requested FBI identification record is not in the inmate's institution file, staff shall direct the inmate to the procedure referenced in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( b ) *NCIC/III identification record.* An inmate who wishes to obtain a copy of his or her NCIC/III record must submit a written request to the FBI. The procedures outlined in 28 CFR 16.32, 16.33, and paragraphs (a)(1)(i) and (ii) of this section apply to such request.
#### § 68.46 Authenticity.

The authenticity of all documents submitted as proposed exhibits in advance of the hearing shall be deemed admitted unless written objection therto is filed prior to the hearing, except that a party will be permitted to challenge such authenticity at a later time upon a clear showing of good cause for failure to have filed such written objection.

[54 FR 48596, Nov. 24, 1989. Redesignated by Order No. 1534-91, 56 FR 50053, Oct. 3, 1991]
### §3168. Injunctive relief

No court shall have jurisdiction to grant any injunctive relief lasting longer than ninety days against any action pursuant to this subchapter except in conjunction with a final judgment entered in a case involving an action pursuant to this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 96–487, title XI, §1108, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2464; Pub. L. 98–620, title IV, §402(22)(B), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3358.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–620 redesignated subsec. (c) as entire section, and struck out subsecs. (a) and (b), which had related, respectively, to Congressional intent concerning, and time periods for, expedited judicial review.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–620 not applicable to cases pending on Nov. 8, 1984, see section 403 of Pub. L. 98–620, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1657 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
#### Buck GOSSETT, Movant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 23, 1939.

R. C, Tartar for movant.

Hubert Meredith, Attorney General, and J. M. Campbell, Assistant Attorney General, opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal denied; judgment affirmed.
### §410iiii–3. Property acquisition

The Secretary is authorized to acquire by donation, exchange, or purchase with donated or appropriated funds the real property described in subsections (b) and (c) of section 410iiii–2 of this title. Any property owned by the State of Kansas or South Carolina or any political subdivision thereof may be acquired only by donation. The Secretary may also acquire by the same methods personal property associated with, and appropriate for, the interpretation of the historical park. The Secretary may not acquire such personal property without the consent of the owner or by condemnation of any land or interest in land within the boundaries of the historical park.

(Pub. L. 102–525, title I, §104, Oct. 26, 1992, 106 Stat. 3439; Pub. L. 117–123, §§2(c)(4), 3(f), May 12, 2022, 136 Stat. 1196, 1199.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–123 substituted "subsections (b) and (c) of section 410iiii–2" for "section 410iiii–2(b)", "State of Kansas or South Carolina" for "States of Kansas", and "historical park. The Secretary" for "historic site: Provided, however, That the Secretary" and inserted "or by condemnation of any land or interest in land within the boundaries of the historical park" after "without the consent of the owner".
Case 15-33374 Doc 1 Filed 07/05/15 Entered 07/05/15 22:44:52 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 15
Case 15-33374 Doc 1 Filed 07/05/15 Entered 07/05/15 22:44:52 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 15
Case 15-33374 Doc 1 Filed 07/05/15 Entered 07/05/15 22:44:52 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 15
Case 15-33374 Doc 1 Filed 07/05/15 Entered 07/05/15 22:44:52 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 15
Case 15-33374 Doc 1 Filed 07/05/15 Entered 07/05/15 22:44:52 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 15
Case 15-33374 Doc 1 Filed 07/05/15 Entered 07/05/15 22:44:52 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 15
Case 15-33374 Doc 1 Filed 07/05/15 Entered 07/05/15 22:44:52 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 15
Case 15-33374 Doc 1 Filed 07/05/15 Entered 07/05/15 22:44:52 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 15
Case 15-33374 Doc 1 Filed 07/05/15 Entered 07/05/15 22:44:52 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 15
Case 15-33374 Doc 1 Filed 07/05/15 Entered 07/05/15 22:44:52 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 15
Case 15-33374 Doc 1 Filed 07/05/15 Entered 07/05/15 22:44:52 Desc Main

 Document Page 11 of 15
Case 15-33374 Doc 1 Filed 07/05/15 Entered 07/05/15 22:44:52 Desc Main

 Document Page 12 of 15
Case 15-33374 Doc 1 Filed 07/05/15 Entered 07/05/15 22:44:52 Desc Main

 Document Page 13 of 15
Case 15-33374 Doc 1 Filed 07/05/15 Entered 07/05/15 22:44:52 Desc Main

 Document Page 14 of 15
Case 15-33374 Doc 1 Filed 07/05/15 Entered 07/05/15 22:44:52 Desc Main

 Document Page 15 of 15
Case 1:20-cv-08423-PGG Document 124 Filed 04/21/23 Page 1 of 1
IIA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 46 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed transfer to the United 

Arab Emirates certain defense articles and services. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 5, 2019 

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. PAUL, Mr. 

LEAHY, Mr. YOUNG, and Mr. REED) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign 

Relations 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed 

transfer to the United Arab Emirates certain defense 

articles and services. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the issuance of an export license with respect to the 

4 following proposed exports to the United Arab Emirates 

5 is prohibited: 

6 (1) The transfer of the following defense arti7 cles, including services and technical data, described 

8 in Executive Communication 1415 (EC–1415) sub9 mitted to Congress pursuant to section 36(c) of the 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 46 IS 

1 Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(c)) and 

2 published in the Congressional Record on June 3, 

3 2019: The proposed export of 100 M107A1 .50 cal4 iber semi-automatic rifles and sound suppressors to 

5 the United Arab Emirates for use by the Armed 

6 Forces General Headquarters of the United Arab 

7 Emirates. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15981-15982]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6659]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

[GSA Bulletin FTR 11-06; Docket 2011-0002; Sequence 2]


Maximum Per Diem Rates for the States of California, Mississippi, 
New York, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Virginia

AGENCY: Office of Governmentwide Policy, General Services 
Administration (GSA).

ACTION: Notice of Per Diem Bulletin 11-06, revised continental United 
States (CONUS) per diem rates.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The General Services Administration (GSA) has conducted its 
mid-year review and has determined that the per diem rates for certain 
locations in the States of California, Mississippi, New York, 
Pennsylvania, Texas, and Virginia are inadequate.

DATES: This notice is effective April 1, 2011, and applies for travel 
performed on or after April 1, 2011, through September 30, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For clarification of content, contact 
Ms. Jill Denning, Office of Governmentwide Policy, Travel Management 
Policy, at (202) 208-7642. Please cite FTR Per Diem Bulletin 11-06.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Background

    After an analysis of the per diem rates established for FY 2011 
(see the Federal Register notice at 75 FR 52947, August 30, 2010, and 
FTR Bulletin 11-01), non-standard area per diem rates are being 
established or changed for the following locations:

State of California

    <bullet> San Bernadino County
    <bullet> San Francisco County

State of Mississippi

    <bullet> Lafayette County

[[Page 15982]]

State of New York

    <bullet> Bronx, New York, Kings, Queens, and Richmond Counties

State of Pennsylvania

    <bullet> Dauphin County

State of Texas

    <bullet> Hunt County

State of Virginia

    <bullet> Caroline County
    Per diem rates are published on the Internet at http://www.gsa.gov/perdiem as FTR per diem bulletins. This process ensures timely notice 
of increases or decreases in per diem rates established by GSA for 
Federal employees on official travel within CONUS. Notices published 
periodically in the Federal Register, such as this one, now constitute 
the only notification of revisions in CONUS per diem rates to agencies.

    Dated: March 15, 2011.
Robert Holcombe,
Program Director, Office of Travel, Transportation and Asset 
Management.
[FR Doc. 2011-6659 Filed 3-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-14-P
HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 24974 1986
HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 24975 1986
HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 24976 1986
HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 24977 1986
HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 24978 1986
HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 24979 1986
HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 24980 1986
HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 24981 1986
HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 24982 1986
HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 24983 1986
HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 24984 1986
HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 24985 1986
HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 24986 1986
HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 24987 1986
HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 24988 1986
HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 24989 1986
HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 24990 1986
HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 24991 1986
HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 24992 1986
HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 24993 1986
HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 24994 1986
HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 24995 1986
HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 24996 1986
HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 24997 1986
HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 24998 1986
HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 24999 1986
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 28, 1997 AND CONSOLIDATED
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 28, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                     211,901,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              152,578,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                13,095,000
<INVENTORY>                                118,844,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           507,577,000
<PP&E>                                     141,610,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              48,308,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             602,448,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      112,855,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       953,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 481,794,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               602,448,000
<SALES>                                    621,653,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           621,653,000
<CGS>                                      340,482,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              501,251,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,750,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            123,152,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                38,793,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         84,359,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                84,359,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.87
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP

Filed pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Section 17(a) of the Public Utility

Holding Company Act of 1935 or Section 30(h) of the Investment Company Act of 1940

1. Name and Address of Reporting Person* (Last) (First) (Middle) (Street) (City) (State) (Zip)

Table I — Non-Derivative Securities Acquired, Disposed of, o

FORM 4

Check this box if no longer

 subject to Section 16. Form 4 or Form 

5 obligations may continue. 

 See Instruction 1(b).

(Print or Type Responses)

 4. If Amendment, Date Original Filed(Month/Day/Year)

5. Relationship  Direct O

ffi ce

 title be6. Individual or  __Form fi led  __Form fi led 

1. Title of Security (Instr. 3)

2. Transaction Date (Month/ Day/ Year)

3. Transaction Code (Instr. 8)Code V

4. Securities Acquired (A) or Disposed of (D) (Instr. 3, 4 and 5) (A) or Amount (D) Price

5. Amou

Securi

 Bene

fi 

Owned ing ReTransa

 (Instr. 

Potential persons who are to respond to the collection of inforin this form are not required to respond unless the form displayOMB control number.

Reminder: Report on a separate line for each class of securities bene

fi cially owned directly or indirectly.

* If the form is 

fi led by more than one reporting person, see Instruction 4(b)(v).

2. Issuer Name and Ticker or Trading Symbol3. Date of Earliest  Transcaction Required  to be Reported (Month/Day/Year)

2A. Deemed Execution 

Date, if any

 (Month/ Day/Year)

Check this box to indicate that a transaction was made pursuant to a contract, instruction or written plan that is intended to satisfy the affi rmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c). 

See Instruction 10.
FORM 4 (continued) Table II — Derivative Securities Acquired, Disposed of, or Benefi cially Owned 

( e.g., puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)

1. Title of Derivative

 Security(Instr. 3)

2. Conver- sion or Exercise Price of Deri- vative Security

3. Trans- action Date(Month/Day/Year)

4. Trans-  action Code (Instr. 8) Code V

6. Date Exer- cisable and Expiration Date (Month/Day/ Year)Date ExpiraExer- tioncisable Date

5. Number of Derivative Securities

Ac-quired (A) orDis-posed of (D)(Instr. 3, 4, and 5)

(A) (D) 

8. Price

ofDeriv

 ative  Secu ity (Instr 5)

7. Title and Amount of Underlying Securities

(Instr. 3 and 4)

 Amount or

 Title Number of

 Shares

Explanation of Responses:** Intentional misstatements or omissions of facts constitute Federal Criminal Violations. **Signature of Reporting Person  See 18 U.S.C. 1001 and 15 U.S.C. 78ff (a).Note: File three copies of this Form, one of which must be manually signed. If space is insuffi cient,

see Instruction 6 for procedure.

Potential persons who are to respond to the collection of information contained in this form are notrequired to respond unless the form displays a currently valid OMB Number.

3A. Deemed Execution Date, if  any(Month/Day/Year)
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Sandra L. Brown, Respondent, v Harden Furniture, Appellant. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

[823 NYS2d 628]

Spain, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed January 24, 2005, which determined that apportionment did not apply to claimant’s workers’ compensation award.

On April 22, 2002, claimant’s decedent, a truck driver, began experiencing what appeared to be stomach pains while attempting to unload a heavy piece of furniture. A witness, who *1029observed him lie down on the end of his trailer, called 911. Emergency personnel transported decedent to a hospital but he did not survive. An autopsy determined the immediate cause of death to be bronchopneumonia associated with hypertensive cardiovascular disease.

Claimant submitted a claim for workers’ compensation benefits which included a report from a consulting physician who concluded that decedent’s death was related to his exertion at work. A medical consultant for the employer’s workers’ compensation carrier agreed that decedent’s death was work related but opined that his underlying medical conditions, which included obesity and cardiomyopathy, were also significant contributing factors. A Workers’ Compensation Law Judge determined that a causal relationship had been established, awarded benefits and ruled that apportionment was not applicable to claimant’s claim. The Workers’ Compensation Board affirmed that determination, prompting this appeal by the self-insured employer.

As a matter of law, apportionment is not applicable “where the preexisting condition was not the result of a compensable injury and the claimant was able to effectively perform his or her job duties at the time of the work-related [incident] despite the preexisting condition” *(Matter of Bremner v New Venture Gear,*31 AD3d 848, 848 [2006]; *see Matter of Johnson v Feinberg-Smith Assoc.,*305 AD2d 826, 827 [2003]). Here, although decedent had undergone two medical evaluations only weeks prior to his death, neither of those evaluations resulted in a directive or recommendation that he refrain from fully performing the duties of his job. Similarly, decedent’s complaints regarding flu-like symptoms immediately preceding his death do not constitute “ ‘a disability in a compensation sense’ ” *(Matter of Krebs v Town of Ithaca,*293 AD2d 883, 884 [2002], *lv denied*100 NY2d 501 [2003], quoting *Matter of Carbonaro v Chinatown Sea Food,*55 AD2d 756, 757 [1976]). Inasmuch as the Board’s factual determination is supported by substantial evidence, including the opinions of both consulting physicians that decedent’s death was related to the strenuous physical activity associated with his work-related responsibilities, it must be affirmed *(see Matter of Ricci v Riegel & Sons,*278 AD2d 673, 674 [2000]).

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Carpinello and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

TRAVEL GROUP, INC., DIB/A REPUBLIC AIR TRAVEL 

AND SCOT SPENCER 

AIRLIFT GROUP, INC. 

AND RICHARD BERNARD 

U1 ·authorized Air Transportation, 

UJfair and Deceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of 

Cflmpetition, am/ Violations of Public Charter Rules 

EXPRESS ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

Unfair and Deceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of 

Competition, and Violations of Public Charter Rules 

Enforcement Proceeding 

STATUS REPORT 

DOT -OST -1995-272 

formerly Docket 49233 

The Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and 

Proceedings ("Enforcement Office"), pursuant to Your Honor's March 22, 2006, Order 

staying this proceeding, files this report detailing the cunent status of this proceeding and 

settlement negotiations. 

The Department has not ruled on the outstanding motions filed by Respondents 

and opposed by the Enforcement Office in Ascend Aviation Group, Docket OST-2004-

17486. 
2 

There have been no further settlement discussions. 

Date: February 28,2013 

;z;~~ I;;~::~;' Samuel Podberesky 

Assistant General Counsel for 

Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

,Vinh Q. Nguyen 

Senior Trial Attorney 

United States Depattment of Transportation 

Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Room 96-429 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: 202-366-9342 

FAX: 202-366-7152 
3 

Docket No. DOT-OST-1995-272 

I hereby certify that on this 28th day of February, 2013, a true and conect copy of the 

foregoing Status Report was served in the following manner to the following: 

Original 

U.S. Department ofTransportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

By First Class Mail 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department ofTransportation 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: (202) 366-2142 

FAX: (202) 366-7536 

By First Class Mail 

Scot Spencer 

SBD Aircraft Services 

255 S Leland Norton Way 

San Bernardino, CA 92408
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 25 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 25

 Relating to the disapproval of the proposed sale to the Government of 
   the United Arab Emirates of certain defense articles and services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 14, 2019

  Mr. Paul introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
        twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Relating to the disapproval of the proposed sale to the Government of 
   the United Arab Emirates of certain defense articles and services.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the issuance of a letter 
of offer with respect to any of the following proposed sales to the 
Government of the United Arab Emirates (described in the certification 
Transmittal No. 19-37, sent to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives and the chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations 
of the Senate pursuant to section 36(b)(1) of the Arms Export Control 
Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(b)(1)) on May 6, 2019), is hereby prohibited:
            (1) The proposed sale of up to four hundred fifty-two (452) 
        Patriot Advanced Capability 3 (PAC-3) Missiles Segment Enhanced 
        (MSE) (Transmittal Numbered 19-37).
            (2) The proposed sale of tools and test equipment, support 
        equipment, publications and technical documentation, personnel 
        training and training equipment, spare and repair parts, 
        facility design, U.S. Government and contractor technical, 
        engineering, and logistics support services, and other related 
        elements of logistics, sustainment and program support 
        (Transmittal Numbered 19-37).
                                 <all>
```