alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Don’t feel well? 

Stay Home When You Are Sick

Tell your mom, dad, or caregiver before 

you come to school.Tell your teacher or 

an adult if you become sick at school

CS 317450-A July 20, 2020 9:09 AM

cdc.gov/coronavirus

Other symptoms 

include: 

fever, runny nose, diarrhea, feeling nauseous

or vomiting, feeling tired, headache, 

and poor appetite

cough

sore throat loss of taste 

or smell

muscle pain

Shortness of breath 

or problem breathing

chills
| 063595.001-1518996.4 |
|----------------------|

|  BY      MAIL OR OVERNIGHT COURIER:                                                                                                                    | BY      FACSIMILE:(ELIGIBLE      INSTITUTIONS ONLY) |  BY      HAND:                                                                                                            |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| American      Stock Transfer & Trust CompanyOperations      CenterAttn:      Reorganization Department6201      15th      AvenueBrooklyn,      NY 11219 | (718)      234-5001                                 | American      Stock Transfer & Trust CompanyAttn:      Reorganization Department59      Maiden LaneNew      York, NY 10038 |

----

| (1) | SHARES      TENDERED AT PRICE DETERMINED BY STOCKHOLDER (SEE INSTRUCTION 5 OF THE      LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL) |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| o         $4.00  | o$4.375       | o       $4.75  |
|---------------------------------|---------------|---------------------|
| o         $4.125 | o    $4.50    | o       $4.875 |
| o    $4.25                      | o      $4.625 | o       $5.00  |

| (2) | SHARES      TENDERED AT PRICE DETERMINED UNDER THE TENDER OFFER (SEE INSTRUCTION 5 OF      THE LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL) |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| o | The      undersigned wants to maximize the chance of having the Company purchase      all of the shares the undersigned is tendering (subject to the possibility      of proration).  Accordingly, by checking this box instead of one      of the price boxes above, the undersigned hereby tenders shares at, and is      willing to accept, the purchase price determined by the Company in      accordance with the terms of the Offer.  THIS ACTION COULD LOWER THE      PURCHASE PRICE AND COULD RESULT IN RECEIVING THE MINIMUM PRICE OF $4.00      PER SHARE. |
|---|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----

----
#### § 61.10 Ensuring Department NEPA compliance.

The Land and Natural Resources Division shall have final responsibility for ensuring compliance with the requirements of the procedures set forth in this part.
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 42 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed export to the United Arab Emirates and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland of certain 

defense articles, including technical data and defense 

services. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the issuance of an export license with respect to any 

4 of the following proposed exports to the United Arab 

5 Emirates and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and 

6 Northern Ireland is prohibited: 

7 (1) The transfer to the United Arab Emirates 

8 and to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and 

9 Northern Ireland of the following defense articles, 

10 including technical data and defense services, de11 scribed in Executive Communication 1421 (EC– 

12 1421) submitted to Congress pursuant to section 

13 36(c) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 

14 2776(c)) and published in the Congressional Record 

15 on June 3, 2019: The proposed technical assistance 
2 

†SJ 42 ES 

1 agreement with Armed Forces of the United Arab 

2 Emirates to transfer defense articles, defense serv3 ices, and technical data to support preparation ship4 ment, delivery, and acceptance of the Guidance En5 hanced (GEM–T) in support of the Patriot Program 

6 for end use by the Government of the United Arab 

7 Emirates. 

Passed the Senate June 20, 2019. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 42 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the protechnical data and defense services. ern Ireland of certain defense articles, including the United Kingdom of Great Britain and North- posed export to the United Arab Emirates and
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6356
DOMINIQUE VENCENTIN GRAY , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. JOHNNY HAWKINS, Superintendent; RAY COOPER, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina , Respondents

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. ( 5:16

- hc

- 02142

- BO )

Submitted : June 20 , 2019 Decided: June 25, 2019

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judge s .

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Dominique Vencentin Gray, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Dominique Vencentin Gray seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)( 1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the distr ict court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85.
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gray has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. Henry C. Elfast et al., Individually and as Copartners under the Firm Name of Elfast, Frisk & Company, et al., Defendants. Mildred K. Stillwaggon, Intervener, Appellant; Arthur C. Frisk et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
1 ... S ee Te x. R. App . P. 47. 4. 

## COURT OFAPPEA LS SE COND DIST RIC TOF TE XAS FORT WORTH NO . 2- 10- 001- CR F R E D C OT T ON, J R . AP P E L L ANT V . TH E STA TE O F TEXA S STA TE

----- ----- -- FR O M THE 30TH DI STRI CT CO URT O F W I CH I TA CO UN TY

----- ----- -- 

### MEMORANDU M OPI NI ON 1

----- ----- -- The t r i al co urtrevo ke d Appel l ant Fred C ot t on, Jr . ’ s def erred adj udi ca t i on com m uni ty s upe r

vi si on, co nvi ct ed hi m of ag grava t ed se xua l as sa ul t , an d se nt enc ed hi m t o forty- fi ve yea rs’ co nfi nem ent . The t r i al co urti m pos ed t he sent ence on Jun e 12 , 20 09 . A ppel l ant fi l ed a t i m el y m ot i on for new t r i al , so2 ... S ee T ex. R . A pp. P. 26 . 2(a) ( 2) ( provi di ng t hatnot i ce of appeal m ust b e fi l e d w i th i n n i n e ty d a y s o f s e n te n c i n g ).

3 ... I d. 4 ... O l i v o v . S tate , 9 1 8 S .W .2 d 5 1 9 , 5 2 2 (T e x . C ri m . A p p . 1 9 9 6 ). 5 ... S ee T e x . C o d e C ri m . P ro c . A n n . a rt. 1 1 .0 7 (V e rn o n S u p p . 2 0 0 9 ); O l i vo , 9 1 8 S .W .2 d a t 5 2 5 n .8 ; W ri g h t v. S tate , N o. 0 2- 05- 00076 - CR, 2005 W L 1 5 9 4 3 6 7 , a t* 1 n . 2 (T e x . Ap p . — F o rtW o rt h J u l y 7 , 2 0 0 5 , n o p e t . ) ( me m. o p ., n o t d e s i g n a te d fo r p u b l i c a ti o n ). 2 hi s not i c e o f

a pp e a l w a s d ue Se pt e m be r 10, 2009 . 2 H e di d not fi l e hi s not i ce of ap pea l unt i l D ec em ber 31, 2009 ; t hus , i tw asunt i m el y. A ccordi ngl y, w e i nfor m ed A ppel l antby letter on Janu ar

y 6, 20 10 , t hat t hi s appeal w as subj ectt o di sm i ssal unl ess A ppel l antor any party show ed groundsfor

co nt i nui ng t he appeal on o r be fore J anu ar

y 19, 2010 . Appel l ant di d respond , buthi s response does not show groun ds on w hi ch t hi s courtm ay re ly fo r c o n t in u in g h is a p p e a l. A n o t ic e o f

a p p e a l t h a tc o m p lie sw it h t h e re q u ire m e n t s o f ru le 2 6 is e s s e n t i a l t o v e s tt h i s c o u rtw i t h j u r i s d i ct i on. 3 The T exas C ourtof C r i m i nal A ppe al s hasex pres sl y he l d t hat , w i t houta t i m el y fi l ed not i ce of a pp ea l or m o ti o n for

ext ensi on of t i m e, t hi s courtcannot exerci se j ur i sdi ct i on ov er an a p p e a l. 4 O n l y th e T e x a s C o u rt o f C ri m i n a l A p p e a l s m a y g ran t A p p e l l a n t an o u to f-t im e a p p e a l. 56 ... S ee T e x . R . A p p . P . 2 6 .2 (a )(2 ), 4 3 .2 (f). 3 B e c a u s e A p p e lla n t ’s n o t ic e o f a p p e a l w a s u n t im e ly file d , w e d is m is s t h is ca se for w antof

j ur i sd i ct i on. 6 P E R CU R I AM PA N EL: DA U PH I N O T, G A RD N ER, an d W A LKER, JJ. DO NO T P UBLI SH Tex. R. A pp. P. 47. 2( b) DEL I VERE D: F e brua r y 11, 2010
§ 22.2 Definitions. ( a ) *Person* means any individual, partnership, corporation, association, public or private organization or governmental entity, or combination thereof.
( b ) *Private person* means any person defined in § 22.2(a) other than an agency, or department of Federal, State, or local government, or any component or combination thereof. Included as a private person is an individual acting in his or her official capacity.
( c ) *Research or statistical project* means any program, project, or component thereof which is supported in whole or in part with funds appropriated under the Act and whose purpose is to develop, measure, evaluate, or otherwise advance the state of knowledge in a particular area. The term does not include “intelligence” or other information-gathering activities in which information pertaining to specific individuals is obtained for purposes directly related to enforcement of the criminal laws.
( d ) *Research or statistical information* means any information which is collected during the conduct of a research or statistical project and which is intended to be utilized for research or statistical purposes. The term includes information which is collected directly from the individual or obtained from any agency or individual having possession, knowledge, or control thereof.
( e ) *Information identifiable to a private person* means information which either— ( 1 ) Is labelled by name or other personal identifiers, or
( 2 ) Can, by virtue of sample size or other factors, be reasonably interpreted as referring to a particular private person.
( f ) *Recipient of assistance* means any recipient of a grant, contract, interagency agreement, subgrant, or subcontract under the Act and any person, including subcontractors, employed by such recipient in connection with performances of the grant, contract, or interagency agreement.
( g ) *Officer or employee of the Federal Government* means any person employed as a regular or special employee of the U.S. (including experts, consultants, and advisory board members) as of July 1, 1973, or at any time thereafter.
( h ) *The act* means the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended.
( i ) *Applicant* means any person who applies for a grant, contract, or subgrant to be funded pursuant to the Act.
( j ) *The Juvenile Justice Act* means the “Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974, as amended.”
( k ) *The Victims of Crime Act* means the Victims of Crime Act of 1984.
[41 FR 54846, Dec. 15, 1976, as amended at 43 FR 16974, Apr. 21, 1978; 51 FR 6400, Feb. 24, 1986]
#### Susan E. Robinson, Plaintiff, v. Edward Davidow and Others, Defendants.

Motion denied, without costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ.
#### § 68.26 Designation of Administrative Law Judge.

Hearings shall be held before an Administrative Law Judge appointed under 5 U.S.C. 3105 and assigned to the Department of Justice. The presiding judge in any case shall be initially designated by the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer. The Chief Administrative Law Judge may reassign a case previously assigned to an Administrative Law Judge to promote administrative efficiency. In unfair-immigration-related employment practice cases, only Administrative Law Judges specially designated by the Attorney General as having special training respecting employment discrimination may be chosen by the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer or Chief Administrative Law Judge to preside.

[AG Order No. 4840-2020, 85 FR 63207, Oct. 7, 2020]
* This order is being entered by a quorum of this court

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 46.

** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-00091

 

IN RE: CHARLES ALAN MALOY, Petitioner

 

Motion for an Order Authorizing the Filing

of a Successive Habeas Petition

(CR93-10013-02)

 

June 12, 1998

Before HIGGINBOTHAM and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.*

PER CURIAM:**

Charles Alan Maloy seeks an order authorizing him to file a

successive habeas petition in district court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§2255. In support, Maloy contends that the Supreme Court announced

a new rule of constitutional law in Bailey v. U.S., 516 U.S. 137

(1995), which was made available on collateral review.

Virtually every court of appeal, including this court, has

concluded that Bailey did not announce a new rule of constitutional
2

law, rather it merely interpreted a substantive criminal statute

using rules of Statutory construction. U.S. v. Gobert, 139 F.3d

436, 438 (5th Cir. 1998); In re Dorsainvil, 119 F.3d 245, 249 (3d

Cir. 1997); U.S. v. Lorensten, 106 F.3d 279, 279 (9th Cir. 1997);

Triestman v. U.S., 124 F.3d 361, 369-70 (2d Cir. 1997); In re Vial,

115 F.3d 1192, 1194-95 (4th Cir. 1997); Coleman v. U.S., 106 F.3d

339, 341-42 (10th Cir. 1997); In re Blackshire, 98 F.3d 1293, 1294

(11th Cir. 1996); Nunez v. U.S., 96 F.3d 990, 992 (7th Cir. 1996).

Therefore, Maloy has failed to satisfy the statutory requirements

to file a successive habeas petition as set forth in 28 U.S.C. §§

2255, 2244(b)(2), 2244(b)(3)(C). 

DENIED.
5(&25'2)

#  9,6,7

#  &21)(5(1&( 25  7(/(3+21( &$// 7, 0 ( ' $ 7 (

1 $0( 6  2 )3(56 2 1 6 & 21 7 $ & 7 ( ' 2 5,1 &2 1)(5 ( 1&($1' / 2 & $ 7,21 5 287 , 1*

6<0% 2/ , 1 ,7 ,$/6

6 8 %-(&7

',*(6 7

&21 & / 86 , 21

 $&7,217 $. (1

 2 55(48 , 5 ( '

'

$ 7 ( 7,7/ ( 6 , * 1 $ 7 85(

)$$)RUP  6XSHUVHGHV3UHYLRXV(GLWLRQ  3DJH 

# ✔ 1400 3 April 2014

Renee' Gregory, Director of Operations, Part 135, Al's Aerial Spraying, Inc.

Status of Exemption Extension Request - 10142 (Reg Docket No FAA-2010-0134)

On 3 April, 2014 I called Renee’ Gregory, Director of Operations, Al’s Aerial Spraying, Inc. (part 135).

The purpose of the call was to discuss the delay in completing the operator’s request for exemption

extension to specified sections of part 137. The conversation centered on discussions of FAA

processes, how this exemption was different than previous exemptions, and what information was

missing or not clear from the operator’s petition.

I explained that the operator did not include, with their petition to extend their exemption, a summary

of operator safety data, per condition number eleven (11). I also recommended that the operator

contact the Principle Operations Inspector and clarify the data the operator is using to justify an

equivalent level of safety as part of their request to amend the conditions/limitations.

Additionally, I explained that, in order to expedite processing of the exemption request, the FAA would

first; consider the exemption without the operator’s requested changes to the conditions and

limitations. At a later date, the FAA would fully analyze and respond the operator’s request for change

to their conditions and limitations. End.

7 April 2014 Acting Manager, AFS-820',*(67 &217 

)$$ )RUP 6XSHUVHGHV3UHYLRXV(GLWLRQ 3DJH
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 136 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Safe Digging Month. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 2, 2019 

Mr. WICKER (for himself, Ms. CANTWELL, Mrs. FISCHER, and Ms. 

DUCKWORTH) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Safe Digging 

Month. 

Whereas each year, the underground utility infrastructure of 

the United States, including pipelines, electric, gas, telecommunications, water, sewer, and cable television lines, 

is jeopardized by unintentional damage caused by those 

who fail to have underground lines located prior to 

digging; 

Whereas some utility lines are buried only a few inches underground, making the lines easy to strike, even during 

shallow digging projects; 

Whereas digging prior to locating underground utility lines 

often results in unintended consequences, such as service 

interruption, environmental damage, personal injury, and 

even death; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 136 IS 

Whereas the month of April marks the beginning of the peak 

period during which excavation projects are carried out 

around the United States; 

Whereas in 2002, Congress required the Department of 

Transportation and the Federal Communications Commission to establish a 3-digit, nationwide, toll-free number to be used by State ‘‘One Call’’ systems to provide 

information on underground utility lines; 

Whereas in 2005, the Federal Communications Commission 

designated ‘‘811’’ as the nationwide ‘‘One Call’’ number 

for homeowners and excavators to use to obtain information on underground utility lines before conducting excavation activities; 

Whereas the 1,700 members of the Common Ground Alliance, who are dedicated to ensuring public safety, environmental protection, and the integrity of services, promote the national ‘‘Call Before You Dig’’ campaign to increase public awareness about the importance of homeowners and excavators calling 811 to find out the exact 

location of underground lines; 

Whereas the Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty, and Job 

Creation Act of 2011 (Public Law 112–90; 125 Stat. 

1904) affirmed and expanded the ‘‘One Call’’ program by 

eliminating exemptions given to local and State government agencies and their contractors regarding notifying 

‘‘One Call’’ centers before digging; and 

Whereas the Common Ground Alliance has designated April 

as ‘‘National Safe Digging Month’’ to increase awareness 

of safe digging practices across the United States and to 

celebrate the anniversary of 811, the national ‘‘Call Before You Dig’’ number: Now, therefore, be it 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 136 IS 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of National 

3 Safe Digging Month; and 

4 (2) encourages all homeowners and excavators 

5 throughout the United States to call 811 before 

6 digging. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
EXHIBIT
32




Rule
13a-14(b) Certification





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Senior Optician Service,
Inc. (the “Company”) certifies that:




1.           The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2008
(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  August
      13, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Honggang
      YuHonggang
      Yu, Chief Executive Officer
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

HENRY ALBERT HOLBROOK, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D14-2121

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed February 27, 2019. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charlotte 

County; Amy R. Hawthorne, Judge.

Michael L. Maple, Louisville, Kentucky, for 

Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Linsey SimsBohnenstiehl, Assistant Attorney General, 

Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, BLACK, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
#### § 40.15 Full certification.

If, in the judgment of the Attorney General, a grievance procedure that has been in existence longer than one year at the time of application is in substantial compliance with the standards promulgated herein or is otherwise fair and effective, the Attorney General shall grant full certification. Such certification shall remain in effect unless and until the Attorney General finds reasonable cause to believe that the grievance procedure is no longer in substantial compliance with the minimum standards or is no longer fair and effective, and so notifies the applicant in writing.

[Order No. 1955-95, 60 FR 13903, Mar. 15, 1995]
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-12-0000422

20-NOV-2013

07:45 AM
#### § 51.65 Who may petition.

Any jurisdiction or interested individual or group may petition to have these procedural guidelines amended.