alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 90.10 STOP (Services * Training * Officers * Prosecutors) Violence Against Women Formula Grant Program—general.

The purposes, criteria, and requirements for the STOP Violence Against Women Formula Grant Program are established by 42 U.S.C. 3796gg *et seq.* Eligible applicants for the program are the 50 States, American Samoa, Guam, Puerto Rico, Northern Mariana Islands, U.S. Virgin Islands, and the District of Columbia, hereinafter referred to as “States.”
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

 Division 

In re Case No. 

Debtor(s) Chapter 11 

ORDER CONVERTING CASE FROM CHAPTER 7 TO CHAPTER 11 

The debtor(s) in this case filed a petition under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code on , and on 

 , filed a motion to convert to one under Chapter 11; it is ORDERED that: 

1. This case is converted to one under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code; 

2. The trustee in the Chapter 7 case shall file with the court a final report and account as required by 11 U.S.C. 704(a)(9) 

within 30 days of the entry of this order, with a copy to be mailed to the United States Trustee, and shall file a proof of claim for any 

outstanding expenses incurred during the administration of the Chapter 7 case; 

3. [If checked] The debtor(s) shall remit an additional filing fee of $922.00 to the “Clerk, U. S. Bankruptcy Court” 

within 14 days of the entry of this order; 

4. The debtor(s), pursuant to Local Bankruptcy Rule 1017-1(A), shall file with the Court within 14 days of the entry of this 

order as applicable, either: 

(a) a schedule of unpaid debts incurred after commencement of original bankruptcy case, and a list of creditors in the 

format required by the Clerk, or

(b) a certification that no unpaid debts have been incurred since the commencement of the case. 

[If the debtor fails to file the schedule and list referred to above on the date of conversion of the case, any such subsequent filing shall 

be treated as an amendment under Local Bankruptcy Rule 1009-1 and the debtor shall be required to give all required notices and

distribute all required copies, including copies to the trustee and the United States Trustee.] 

5. The debtor(s), pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 1007(d), shall file with the court a List of 20 Largest 

Unsecured Creditors within 14 days of the entry of this order 

6. [If applicable] The debtor(s) shall file with the court a List of Equity Security Holders of each class showing the number 

and kind of interests registered in the name of each holder and the last known address or place of business of each holder, within

14 days of the entry of this order. 

 7. [If Individual Debtor] The debtor, pursuant to Local Bankruptcy Rule 1017-1(C), shall file with the Court within 14 days

after the conversion of this case Official Form 122B, “Chapter 11 Statement of Your Current Monthly Income.” 

It is further ORDERED that the debtor’s failure to comply with the requirements as set out in paragraph 3 and 6 above will 

result in the case being dismissed. 

WILLIAM R. REDDEN 

CLERK OF COURT 

Date: By: ____________________________________________ 

Deputy Clerk 

 NOTICE OF JUDGMENT OR ORDER 

 ENTERED ON DOCKET 

 ________________________________ 

[ocon711 ver. 12/15]

Richmond

Vireol Bio Energy LLC 15-35970-KLP

11/18/2015

12/04/2015

✔

December 14, 2015

December 14, 2015

/s/Suzan Ramirez-Lowe

Case 15-35970-KLP Doc 15 Filed 12/14/15 Entered 12/14/15 10:55:29 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 21-7085 September Term, 2021

1:18-cv-01598-RC

Filed On: June 1, 2022

Tonia Ingram,

Appellant

v.

District of Columbia Child and Family

Services Agency,

Appellee

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Katsas, Rao, and Walker, Circuit Judges

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. R. App. P.

34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). Upon consideration of the foregoing, the motion for

appointment of counsel, and the motion for leave to file supplemental appendix, it is

ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel be denied. In civil cases,

appellants are not entitled to appointment of counsel when they have not demonstrated

sufficient likelihood of success on the merits. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for leave to file supplemental appendix be

granted. The Clerk is directed to file the lodged supplemental appendix. It is

FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s July 30, 2021

order be affirmed. With respect to appellant’s retaliation claim, the district court

correctly concluded that appellant relied only on temporal proximity between her alleged

protected activities and the termination of her employment, and that this was insufficient

to rebut appellee’s proffered legitimate, nonretaliatory reason for firing her. See, e.g.,

Woodruff v. Peters, 482 F.3d 521, 530 (D.C. Cir. 2007). With respect to appellant’s

claims of disability discrimination, the district court correctly concluded that appellant,

who was represented by counsel at the time, cited no evidence from which a

reasonable jury could find that appellee’s proffered reason for firing her was pretext. 

See Adeyemi v. District of Columbia, 525 F.3d 1222, 1226 (D.C. Cir. 2008). To the
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 21-7085 September Term, 2021

extent that appellant now argues that certain additional evidence in the record would

allow a jury to infer that appellee’s proffered reason for firing her was pretext, her

counsel did not raise this argument in district court. Consequently, the argument is

forfeited. See Salazar ex rel. Salazar v. District of Columbia, 602 F.3d 431, 436–37

(D.C. Cir. 2010); see also Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 633–34 (1962)

(observing that a “party is deemed bound by the acts of his lawyer-agent”).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.

P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

Page 2
### §1055. Members of Advisory Board

#### (a) Appointment and number of members

The Advisory Board shall be composed of nine members. The Secretary shall designate the Chairman of the Advisory Board. The Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Fish and Wildlife shall be a member of such Board ex officio. The remaining eight members of such Board shall be appointed as follows—

(1) two Members of the Senate, appointed by the President of the Senate;

(2) two Members of the House of Representatives, appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives;

(3) two individuals appointed by the Secretary, one of whom shall be engaged in or closely associated with, sport fishing, and one of whom shall be engaged in, or closely associated with, commercial fishing; and

(4) two individuals appointed by the Secretary from the public at large.

#### (b) Terms of office

Each class of two members of the Advisory Board referred to in subsection (a) shall be appointed for terms of four years, except that, of each such class of two members initially appointed, one shall be appointed for a term of two years. Any person appointed to fill a vacancy occurring prior to the expiration of the term for which his predecessor was appointed shall be appointed only for the remainder of such term. Of each class of two members of such Board referred to in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a), not more than one shall be from the same political party, and not more than one shall be from the same State. Any member of such Board referred to in such paragraphs (1) and (2) who shall cease to be a Member of Congress during the term of his appointment under this section shall cease to be a member of such Board.

#### (c) Vacancies

Any vacancy in the Advisory Board shall be filled in the same manner as in the case of the original appointment.

(Pub. L. 87–758, §5, Oct. 9, 1962, 76 Stat. 753.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination of Advisory Boards

Advisory boards in existence on Jan. 5, 1973, to terminate not later than the expiration of the 2-year period following Jan. 5, 1973, unless, in the case of a board established by the President or an officer of the Federal Government, such board is renewed by appropriate action prior to the expiration of such 2-year period, or in the case of a board established by the Congress, its duration is otherwise provided for by law. See sections 1001(2) and 1013 of Title 5, Government Officers and Employees.
### §3458. Limitation on assistance

In carrying out this subchapter, the Secretary shall provide technical assistance and financial assistance with respect to not more than 450 active designated areas.

(Pub. L. 97–98, title XV, §1535, as added Pub. L. 107–171, title II, §2504, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 274.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3458, Pub. L. 97–98, title XV, §1535, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1340, related to program evaluation, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 107–171.
§ 48.7 Report of the Assistant Attorney General in Charge of the Antitrust Division. ( a ) The Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division shall, not later than 30 days from the publication in the Federal Register of the notice required by § 48.6, submit to the Attorney General a report on any application filed pursuant to § 48.4. In preparing such report he may require submission by the applicants of any further information which may be relevant to a determination of whether approval of the proposed arrangement is warranted under the Act.
( b ) In his report he may state ( 1 ) that the proposed arrangement should be approved or disapproved without a hearing; or
( 2 ) that a hearing should be held to resolve material issues of fact.
( c ) The report shall be filed, and a copy shall be sent to the applicants. Upon the filing of the report, the Assistant Attorney General for Administration shall cause to be issued a press release setting forth the substance thereof.
( d ) Any person may, within 30 days after filing of the report, file a reply to the report for the consideration of the Attorney General.
§ 50.19 Procedures to be followed by government attorneys prior to filing recusal or disqualification motions. The determination to seek for any reason the disqualification or recusal of a justice, judge, or magistrate is a most significant and sensitive decision. This is particularly true for government attorneys, who should be guided by uniform procedures in obtaining the requisite authorization for such a motion. This statement is designed to establish a uniform procedure. ( a ) No motion to recuse or disqualify a justice, judge, or magistrate (*see, e.g.,* 28 U.S.C. 144, 455) shall be made or supported by any Department of Justice attorney, U.S. Attorney (including Assistant U.S. Attorneys) or agency counsel conducting litigation pursuant to agreement with or authority delegated by the Attorney General, without the prior written approval of the Assistant Attorney General having ultimate supervisory power over the action in which recusal or disqualification is being considered.
( b ) Prior to seeking such approval, Justice Department lawyer(s) handling the litigation shall timely seek the recommendations of the U.S. Attorney for the district in which the matter is pending, and the views of the client agencies, if any. Similarly, if agency attorneys are primarily handling any such suit, they shall seek the recommendations of the U.S. Attorney and provide them to the Department of Justice with the request for approval. In actions where the United States Attorneys are primarily handling the litigation in question, they shall seek the recommendation of the client agencies, if any, for submission to the Assistant Attorney General.
( c ) In the event that the conduct and pace of the litigation does not allow sufficient time to seek the prior written approval by the Assistant Attorney General, prior oral authorization shall be sought and a written record fully reflecting that authorization shall be subsequently prepared and submitted to the Assistant Attorney General.
( d ) Assistant Attorneys General may delegate the authority to approve or deny requests made pursuant to this section, but only to Deputy Assistant Attorneys General or an equivalent position.
( e ) This policy statement does not create or enlarge any legal obligations upon the Department of Justice in civil or criminal litigation, and it is not intended to create any private rights enforceable by private parties in litigation with the United States.
[Order No. 977-82, 47 FR 22094, May 21, 1982]
### §3194. Archeological and paleontological sites

Notwithstanding any acreage or boundary limitations contained in this Act with respect to the Cape Krusenstern National Monument, the Bering Land Bridge National Preserve, the Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve, and the Kobuk Valley National Park, the Secretary may designate Federal lands or he may acquire by purchase with the consent of the owner, donation, or exchange any significant archeological or paleontological site in Alaska located outside of the boundaries of such areas and containing resources which are closely associated with any such area. If any such site is so designated or acquired, it shall be included in and managed as part of such area. Not more than seven thousand five hundred acres of land may be designated or acquired under this section for inclusion in any single area. Before designation or acquisition of any property in excess of one hundred acres under the provisions of this section, the Secretary shall—

(1) submit notice of such proposed designation or acquisition to the appropriate committees of the Congress; and

(2) publish notice of such proposed designation or acquisition in the Federal Register.

(Pub. L. 96–487, title XIII, §1304, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2478.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in provision preceding par. (1), is Pub. L. 96–487, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2371, known as the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3101 of this title and Tables.
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 155 

Relative to the death of the Honorable Ernest F. Hollings, former United 

States Senator for the State of South Carolina. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 10, 2019 

Mr. GRAHAM (for himself and Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina) submitted the 

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Relative to the death of the Honorable Ernest F. Hollings, 

former United States Senator for the State of South 

Carolina. 

Whereas the Honorable Ernest F. Hollings was born in 

Charleston, South Carolina, in 1922 and graduated from 

The Citadel and the University of South Carolina School 

of Law; 

Whereas the Honorable Ernest F. Hollings served his country 

during World War II as an artillery officer in the Army, 

earning a Bronze Star; 

Whereas the Honorable Ernest F. Hollings was elected to the 

South Carolina House of Representatives in 1949; 

Whereas the Honorable Ernest F. Hollings was elected Governor of South Carolina in 1959 and oversaw the estabVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:26 Apr 11, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR155.ATS SR155

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 155 ATS 

lishment of the nationally recognized South Carolina 

Technical College System; 

Whereas the Honorable Ernest F. Hollings served South 

Carolina with devotion and dedication in the United 

States Senate for 38 years; 

Whereas the Honorable Ernest F. Hollings served the Senate 

as Chairman of the Committee on the Budget and Chairman of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation; 

Whereas the Honorable Ernest F. Hollings fought tirelessly 

to combat hunger in the United States and was a strong 

advocate for a robust national defense; 

Whereas the Honorable Ernest F. Hollings championed fiscal 

restraint throughout his career and was the unheralded 

force behind the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit 

Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 900 et seq.); 

Whereas the Honorable Ernest F. Hollings was a devoted 

husband, father, grandfather, and great-grandfather; 

Whereas the service of the Honorable Ernest F. Hollings on 

behalf of the people of South Carolina and all people of 

the United States earned him the respect and devotion of 

his colleagues; and 

Whereas the death of the Honorable Ernest F. Hollings has 

deprived South Carolina and the United States of one of 

the most outstanding Senators: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That— 

2 (1) the Senate has heard with profound sorrow 

3 and deep regret the announcement of the death of 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 155 ATS 

1 the Honorable Ernest F. Hollings, former Senator 

2 for the State of South Carolina; and 

3 (2) the Secretary of the Senate communicate 

4 this resolution to the House of Representatives and 

5 transmit an enrolled copy thereof to the family of 

6 the Honorable Ernest F. Hollings. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Order entered March 3, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00688-CV

RICHARD P. DALE, JR., Appellant

V.

PLAZA AT TURTLE CREEK RESIDENCES ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-05411

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee’s February 26, 2015 unopposed second motion for an 

extension of time to file a brief. Appellee timely filed its brief on February 27, 2015. 

Accordingly, we DENY appellee’s motion as moot.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-0302 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2013-NM-119-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v. AARON CHAVEZ, a.k.a. Aaron Chavez

Muniz, a.k.a. Angel Martinez, a.k.a. Angel Ulloa, a.k.a. Angel Ulloa

- Martinez,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 17

- 50372

D.C. No. 8:16

- cr
- 00141

- DOC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 27, 2018 **

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Aaron Chavez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty

- plea conviction and 120

- month sentence for distribution of methamphetamine , in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) a nd (b)(1)(A)(viii)

. Pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Chavez ’s counsel has filed

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 3 2018
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 50372

a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw
as counsel of record. Chavez has filed a pro se supplemental brief ; the government
has filed an answering brief; and Chavez has filed a reply brief.
Chavez waived his right to appeal his conviction, with the exception of an appeal based on a claim that his plea was involuntary

. Our independent review of the record purs uant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief as to the voluntariness of Chavez ’s plea

. We therefore
affirm as to that issue and dismiss the remainder of the appeal of the conviction in light of the valid appeal waiver

. See United States v. Watson , 582 F.3d 974, 988 (9th Cir. 2009). Our independent review of the record discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal as to Chavez’s sentence, with the exception of three supervised rel ease conditions. We therefore affirm the sentence except as to

s tandard conditions five, six, and fourteen , which were held to be unconstitutionally vague after the district court sentenced Chavez

. See United
States v. Evans , 883 F.3d 1154, 1162

- 64 (9th Cir. ), cert. denied , 2018 WL 2726034 (U.S. Oct. 1, 2018) (No. 17

- 9208)

. We remand for the district court to modify these conditions consistent with our opinion in Evans

. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRM ED in part; DISMISSED in part ; REMANDED with
instructions

.