alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99 (c) - Report of Audit Committee

                       GREAT NORTHERN IRON ORE PROPERTIES
                            Report of Audit Committee
                          Year ended December 31, 2001

The Audit Committee oversees the Trust's financial reporting process on behalf
of the Board of Trustees. Management has the primary responsibility for the
financial statements and the reporting process including the systems of internal
controls. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee
reviewed the audited financial statements in the Annual Report with management
including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the
accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments and the
clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.

The Audit Committee reviewed with the independent auditors, who are responsible
for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial
statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States,
their judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Trust's
accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed
with the Audit Committee under auditing standards generally accepted in the
United States. In addition, the Audit Committee has discussed with the
independent auditors the auditors' independence from management and the Trust
including the matters in the written disclosures required by the Independence
Standards Board.

The Audit Committee discussed with the Trust's independent auditors the overall
scope and plans for their audit. The Audit Committee met with the independent
auditors, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their
examination, their evaluation of the Trust's internal controls and the overall
quality of the Trust's financial reporting.

The Board of Trustees, upon recommendation of the Audit Committee, has approved
the reappointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors to the financial
statements of the Trust for the current fiscal year. Fees for the last annual
audit were $38,500 and all other fees are estimated to be $3,100.

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit
Committee recommended to the Board of Trustees that the audited financial
statements be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2001 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

<PAGE>


             Exhibit 99 (c) - Report of Audit Committee (continued)

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Robert A. Stein
----------------------------------
Audit Committee Chairman

/s/ Roger W. Staehle
----------------------------------
Audit Committee Member

/s/ John H. Roe, III
----------------------------------
Audit Committee Member                                  Dated: February 25, 2002
RESTROOMS

LOUNGE AREA

SLEEPING AREA

MEAL SERVICE AREA

CLINIC

RESOURCE CENTER

How You can Protect Others from COVID-19 

in Shelters: When to Wear a Mask

CS 318294-C 08/07/2020

cdc.gov/coronavirus

Wear a mask* any time you are not in 

an individual room, on your bed or mat, 

eating , or sleeping.

* Masks should not be placed on children under age 2, anyone who has 

trouble breathing or is unconscious, incapacitated or 

otherwise unable to remove the mask without assistance.
#### § 40.6 Remedies.

The grievance procedure shall afford a successful grievant a meaningful remedy. Although available remedies may vary among institutions, a reasonable range of meaningful remedies in each institution is necessary.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Motor vehicle use map. Nationalforests in North Carolina. Nantahala (Highland) [and] (Wayah) Ranger District,Nantahala National Forest, North Carolina [electronic resource].**
2007-1|2007-2|2013|
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.28:N 15/10/

Item Number: 0080-G(online)

CGP systemNumber:000952701 
October 29, 2018
Exhibit
32.2




**CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR**


**RULE
15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350,**


**AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
connection with the quarterly report of Sharp Holding Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George
Sharp, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: **May
20, 2005**





**/s/
George Sharp**


**George
Sharp**


**Principal
Financial Officer of Sharp Holding Corporation**
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Symptoms

Reported illnesses have ranged from mild symptoms to severe illness mild symptoms to severe illness and death for confirmed coronavirus disea

2019 (COVID-19) cases.

Symptoms may appear 2-14 days after exposure* 2-14 days after exposure*:

Fever

Cough

Shortness of breath

*This is based on what has been seen previously as the incubation period of MERS-CoV viruses.

! Call your healthcare professional if you develop symptoms, and have been in close contact with a person

known to have COVID-19 or if you have recently traveled from an area with widespread or ongoing

community spread of COVID-19.

Learn how to protect yourself
More information for...

Pregnant Women

Travelers

Healthcare Professionals

Health Departments

Businesses

Laboratories

Page last reviewed: February 29
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS RULINGS

Release No. 6827/August 26, 2021

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-20378

In the Matter of :

:

ELAINE A. DOWLING, ESQ. : ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

The Securities and Exchange Commission instituted this proceeding with an Order 

Instituting Proceedings (OIP), pursuant to Section 4C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 

Rule 102(e)(1)(ii) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, on June 29, 2021. The OIP alleges that 

Respondent knowingly or recklessly permitted her purported paralegal, a disbarred felon who had 

been suspended from appearing or practicing before the Commission as an attorney, to appear and 

practice before the Commission as an attorney. The Commission’s Office of General Counsel 

(OGC) is seeking to permanently deny Respondent the privilege of appearing or practicing before 

the Commission. 

The OIP provides that Respondent’s Answer is due within twenty days of service of the OIP 

on her. See OIP at 12; 17 C.F.R. § 201.220(b). Respondent was served with the OIP by July 6, 

2021, by USPS certified mail delivery.

1

 17 C.F.R. § 201.141(a)(2)(i). To date Respondent has 

failed to file an Answer within the time provided. On August 18, 2021, OGC filed a motion for 

default that includes a certification that OGC served the motion on Respondent on that date. Any 

opposition to the motion was due by August 25, 2021. 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.154(b), 160(a). To date 

Respondent has failed to respond to the motion for default. 

Accordingly, Respondent IS ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, by September 17, 2021, why 

she should not be deemed to be in default and permanently denied the privilege of appearing or 

practicing before the Commission. See OIP at 12; 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.155(a), .220(f).

/S/ Carol Fox Foelak 

Carol Fox Foelak

Administrative Law Judge

 

1 The USPS tracking numbers for the mailings to Respondent and to her attorney, respectively, are 

70172400000008358126 and 70172400000008358133.
§ 68.28 Authority of Administrative Law Judge. ( a ) *General powers.* In any proceeding under this part, the Administrative Law Judge shall have all appropriate powers necessary to conduct fair and impartial hearings, including, but not limited to, the following: ( 1 ) Conduct formal hearings in accordance with the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act and of this part;
( 2 ) Administer oaths and examine witnesses;
( 3 ) Compel the production of documents and appearance of witnesses in control of the parties;
( 4 ) Compel the appearance of witnesses by the issuance of subpoenas as authorized by law;
( 5 ) Issue decisions and orders;
( 6 ) Take any action authorized by the Administrative Procedure Act;
( 7 ) Exercise, for the purpose of the hearing and in regulating the conduct of the proceeding, such powers vested in the Attorney General as are necessary and appropriate therefore; and
( 8 ) Take other appropriate measures necessary to enable him or her to discharge the duties of the office.
( b ) *Enforcement.* If any person in proceedings before an Administrative Law Judge disobeys or resists any lawful order or process, or misbehaves during a hearing or so near the place thereof as to obstruct the same, or neglects to produce, after having been ordered to do so, any pertinent book, paper, or document, or refuses to appear after having been subpoenaed, or upon appearing refuses to take the oath as a witness, or after having taken the oath refuses to be examined according to law, the Administrative Law Judge responsible for the adjudication may, where authorized by statute or law, apply through appropriate counsel to the Federal District Court having jurisdiction in the place in which he/she is sitting to request appropriate remedies.
[54 FR 48596, Nov. 24, 1989. Redesignated and amended by Order No. 1534-91, 56 FR 50053, 50055, Oct. 3, 1991; Order No. 1635-92, 57 FR 57672, Dec. 7, 1992]
APRIL 1990 CALENDAR

The Honorable C.B. McNeil, Chairman, The Honorable Leif B. Erickson and The Honorable Ed McLean, Judges.

FROM: THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, COUNTY OF CASCADE,

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. RICHARD PAUL HALL, Defendant.

NO. CDC-87-026a DECISION

On November 24,1987, the Defendant was sentenced to Count I, forty (40) years for Robbery; ten (10) years for persistent felony offender and ten (10) years for the use of a dangerous weapon, all sentences are to run consecutively. If paroled, the defendant is to pay restitution in the amount of $22,733; dangerous offender designation.

On November 16, 1989 the Defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The Defendant was present and was represented by Rose Mary Urbigkeit, of the Montana Defender Project. The state was represented by J.KimSchulke, Deputy County Attorney from Cascade County

Beforehearingthe application, the Defendant was advisedthatthe Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it ifsuchis possible. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

After careful consideration, it was the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be remanded back to Judge Thomas McKittrick of the District Court in Cascade County pursuant to the *State v. Camitsch*case to make findings with respect to his reasons for designating the defendant as a dangerous offender.

January 30, 1990, Judge McKittrick filed findings as to his reasons for designating the defendant a dangerous offender.

Judge McNeil and Judge Erickson were the only judges present who sat on the sentence review panel at the time the sentence was remanded back to the Eighth Judicial District, therefore, it is their unanimous decision that the sentence shall be affirmed as originally imposed, including the designation of dangerous offender.

The reason for the decision is the district court judge is presumed correct.

*11DATED this 9th day of March, 1990.
§ 115.12 Contracting with other entities for the confinement of inmates. ( a ) A public agency that contracts for the confinement of its inmates with private agencies or other entities, including other government agencies, shall include in any new contract or contract renewal the entity's obligation to adopt and comply with the PREA standards.
( b ) Any new contract or contract renewal shall provide for agency contract monitoring to ensure that the contractor is complying with the PREA standards.
A--LA ..94■41 , C.J. 

Hardesty 

Gibbons 

(2008) (explaining the distinction between good cause and excusable 

neglect). Accordingly, finding no abuse of discretion, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

Saitta 

cc: Hon. Elissa F. Cadish, District Judge 

Michael H. Singer, Settlement Judge 

Pengilly Law Firm 

• Robison Belaustegui Sharp & Low 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) I947A ern
#### § 2.15 Petition for consideration of parole prior to date set at hearing.

When a prisoner has served the minimum term of imprisonment required by law, the Bureau of Prisons may petition the responsible Regional Commissioner for reopening the case under § 2.28(a) and consideration for parole prior to the date set by the Commission at the initial or review hearing. The petition must show cause why it should be granted, i.e., an emergency, hardship, or the existence of other extraordinary circumstances that would warrant consideration of early parole.

[42 FR 39809, Aug. 5, 1977, as amended at 44 FR 3407, Jan. 16, 1979]
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.01

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-36599, 33-61233, 33-61231, 33-21352, 2-98101, 333-102132 and
333-112208) pertaining to the stock and other incentive plans of Grey Global
Group Inc. of our report dated February 26, 2004 on the consolidated financial
statements and the financial statement schedule of Grey Global Group Inc. and
consolidated subsidiary companies included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 2003.




                                                        ERNST & YOUNG LLP



New York, New York
March 12, 2004
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS
N O . A P - 75, 886

EX PARTE DAN A LYNN ATTAW AY, AK A DA NA LYN N RA GSDALE , A ppl i c ant

ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A W RI T OF HABE AS CORP US CAUS E N O. 0 6 1 9 0 7 1 A I N T HE 8 J UDI CI AL DI S TR I CT COURT TH FROM HO PKI NS CO UNTY

P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provi s i o n s o f Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for wr it of habea s corpus. Ex pa rte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was char g ed in a sing le indictment with one count of

ag g ravated sexual assault of a c hild, an d fi ve counts of inde cenc y with a child
. She ple a de d guil ty

to s ix co un ts o f a g g ra

vate d s e xua l a ssa

ult of a c hil d, and wa s se nte nc e d to tw e nty y ear s for e ach c ounty ear s’ imprisonment. She did not appeal her conviction. Applicant conte nds, inte r a lia , th a t he r c ou ns e l w a s in e ff

e c tiv e and

pr e ssu re d h e r i ntopleadingg uilty . We remande d this application to the trial court for finding s of fact and c onclusions

of law. Trial counse l filed an a ffidavit with t h e trial court. Ba sed on that af fidavit, the trial cour

t deter mined that Applicant re ceive d eff ective a ssistance fr om counsel, and that she enter ed her plea knowing ly

and voluntarily . Howeve r, the trial c ourt also finds that Applicant plea ded guilty in five counts of t he indi ctment t o offe nses m ore serious than t hose wit h which she w as cha rg ed . Applicant is entitled to relief. Ex

pa rteHu e rta , 692 S.W .2d 681 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985). Relief is g rante d. Be cause Applicant’s c onviction on all six counts is the result of a plea barg ain, the entire conviction must be set aside. There fore , the judg ment in Cause No. 0619071A in the 8th J udicial District Court of Hopkins County is se t a side, and Applicant is remande d to the Sheriff of Hopkins County

to answer

the cha rg es ag ainst her
. Copies of t h i s o p i n i o ns h al l b e s en tt o th e T ex as De p art m en to f C ri m i n al J u s t ice–Corr ectional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: April 9, 2008 Do No t Pu

bli sh
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 16 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 16

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
abolish the electoral college and to provide for the direct election of 
         the President and Vice President of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 28, 2019

 Mr. Merkley introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
          twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
abolish the electoral college and to provide for the direct election of 
         the President and Vice President of the United States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The President and Vice President shall be jointly 
elected by the direct popular vote of the people of the several States 
and the District constituting the seat of Government of the United 
States who are over the age of 18.
    ``Section 2. Congress shall determine the time, place, and manner 
of holding the election, and the manner in which the results of the 
election shall be ascertained and declared, and shall establish one day 
throughout the United States by which any period of voting shall be 
complete and during which any eligible voter may cast a vote.
    ``Section 3. Congress shall have the power to enforce this article 
by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Sol Cohen, Doing Business under the Name of Brooklyn Auto School, Appellant; against John Splain, as Commissioner of Motor Vehicles of the State of New York, Respondent.

No opinion. Present—Close, P. J., Cars-well, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of OSK Capital II Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB  for the period ending December 31, 2001,
(the  "Report"), I, Frank Kramer, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/ Frank Kramer
-----------------------
Secretary and Treasurer

Date:  March 29, 2004
§ 549.31 Inmates without funds. ( a ) The Warden must establish procedures to provide up to two OTC medications per week for an inmate without funds. An inmate without funds is an inmate who has not had a trust fund account balance of $6.00 for the past 30 days.
( b ) An inmate without funds may obtain additional OTC medications at sick call if health services staff determine that he/she has an immediate medical need which must be addressed before the inmate may again apply for OTC medications under this section.
( c ) To prevent abuses of this section (*e.g.,* inmate shows a pattern of depleting his or her commissary funds before requesting OTC medications), the Warden may impose restrictions on the provisions of this section.
[68 FR 47849, Aug. 12, 2003, as amended at 69 FR 53805, Sept. 3, 2004]
§ 51.47 Conference. ( a ) A submitting authority that has requested reconsideration of an objection pursuant to § 51.45 may request a conference to produce information or legal argument in support of reconsideration.
( b ) Such a conference shall be held at a location determined by the Attorney General and shall be conducted in an informal manner.
( c ) When a submitting authority requests such a conference, individuals or groups that commented on the change prior to the Attorney General's objection or that seek to participate in response to any notice of a request for reconsideration shall be notified and given the opportunity to confer.
( d ) The Attorney General shall have the discretion to hold separate meetings to confer with the submitting authority and other interested groups or individuals.
( e ) Such conferences will be open to the public or to the press only at the discretion of the Attorney General and with the agreement of the participating parties.
Order entered June 6, 2022

In The



### Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 21

- 01159

- CR

ZACHARY DEAN JOLLIFF

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

On Appeal from the 59th Ju dicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 071936

O RDER

Before the Court is appell ant ’ s June 3, 2022 second motion for an extension

of time to f

ile his brief. We GRANT the mo tion and ORDER appellant ’ s brief due

by July 5, 2022.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE