alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §231c. Administration, protection, and development

The administration, protection, and development of the aforesaid national historical park shall be exercised under the direction of the Secretary of the Interior by the National Park Service, subject to the provisions of the Act of August 25, 1916, entitled "An Act to establish a National Park Service, and for other purposes." 1

(Aug. 10, 1939, ch. 640, §4, 53 Stat. 1342.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Act of August 25, 1916, entitled "An Act to establish a National Park Service, and for other purposes.", referred to in text, is act Aug. 25, 1916, ch. 408, 39 Stat. 535, known as the National Park Service Organic Act, which enacted sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 of this title and provisions set out as a note under section 100101 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs. Sections 1 to 4 of the Act were repealed and restated as section 1865(a) of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and section 100101(a), chapter 1003, and sections 100751(a), 100752, 100753, and 102101 of Title 54 by Pub. L. 113–287, §§3, 4(a)(1), 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3094, 3260, 3272. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables. For disposition of former sections of this title, see Disposition Table preceding section 100101 of Title 54.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

1 See References in Text note below.
冠状病毒疾病 2019 的症状

*Symptoms may 

appear 2-14 days 

after exposure. 

315252-C

cdc.gov/COVID19-ch

呼吸困难

咳嗽

如果您出现症状,并与

确诊 COVID-19的人密切接

触或居住在或最近曾到过 

COVID-19疫区,请就诊。

*症状可能在暴露后

2-14 天出现。

症状*可能包括 发烧

COVID-19 患者有轻度至重度

的呼吸系统疾病。
selepack051410confirmingemailaddress.txt

From: Selepack, Mark [MarkSelepack@GoldenAluminum.com]

Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 3:04 PM

To: Green, David A.

Subject: RE: confirming email address

This is my email address

-----Original Message-----

From: Green, David A. [mailto:green@rti.org] 

Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 9:34 AM

To: Selepack, Mark

Subject: confirming email address

Mr. Selepack,

We are trying to confirm your email address to send you a 

letter.

David Green

RTI International

919.316.3412

www.rti.org

Page 1
§ 68.53 Review of an interlocutory order of an Administrative Law Judge in cases arising under section 274A or 274C. ( a ) *Authority.* In a case arising under section 274A or 274C of the Immigration and Nationality Act, the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer may, within thirty (30) days of the date of an Administrative Law Judge's interlocutory order, issue an order that modifies or vacates the interlocutory order. The Chief Administrative Hearing Officer may review an Administrative Law Judge's interlocutory order if: ( 1 ) An Administrative Law Judge, when issuing an interlocutory order, states in writing that the Judge believes: ( i ) That the order concerns an important question of law on which there is a substantial difference of opinion; and
( ii ) That an immediate appeal will advance the ultimate termination of the proceeding or that subsequent review will be an inadequate remedy; or
( 2 ) Within ten (10) days of the date of the entry of an interlocutory order a party requests by motion that the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer review the interlocutory order. This motion shall contain a clear statement of why interlocutory review is appropriate under the standards set out in paragraph (a)(1) of this section; or
( 3 ) Within ten (10) days of the entry of the interlocutory order, the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer, upon the Officer's own initiative, determines that such order is appropriate for interlocutory review pursuant to the standards set out in paragraph (a)(1) and issues a notification of review. This notification shall state the issues to be reviewed.
( b ) *Stay of proceedings.* Review of an Administrative Law Judge's interlocutory order will not stay the proceeding unless the Administrative Law Judge or the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer determines that the circumstances require a postponement.
( c ) *Review by Chief Administrative Hearing Officer.* Review by the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer of an interlocutory order shall be conducted in the same manner as is provided for review of final orders in § 68.54(b) through (d). An interlocutory order, or an order modifying, vacating, or remanding an interlocutory order, shall not be considered a final agency order. If the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer does not modify, vacate, or remand an interlocutory order reviewed pursuant to paragraph (a) within thirty (30) days of the date that the order is entered, the Administrative Law Judge's interlocutory order is deemed adopted.
( d ) *Effect of interlocutory review.* ( 1 ) An order by the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer modifying or vacating an interlocutory order shall also remand the case to the Administrative Law Judge. Further proceedings in the case shall be conducted consistent with the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer's order.
( 2 ) Whether or not an interlocutory order is reviewed by the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer, all parties retain the right to request administrative review of the final order of the Administrative Law Judge pursuant to § 68.54 with respect to all issues in the case.
[Order No. 2203-99, 64 FR 7081, Feb. 12, 1999]
§ 201.11 Information security and classified national security information. ( a ) All proceedings before and other activities of the DPRC and all activities of the Special Advocates shall be governed by Executive Order 13526 of December 29, 2009, “Classified National Security Information,” or any successor order, and this part.
( b ) Judges may serve on a DPRC panel convened under § 201.7(a), and Special Advocates may be selected to assist a DPRC panel under § 201.8(a), only if they hold the requisite security clearances to access classified national security information. The DPRC and Special Advocates shall have no authority to declassify or grant any person access to any classified or otherwise privileged or protected information, including the information reviewed in or information about the existence or outcome of any proceedings before the DPRC or any information that would tend to reveal whether a complainant was subject to signals intelligence activities.
( c ) The Department of Justice Security Officer shall be responsible for establishing security procedures for proceedings before and other activities of the DPRC and the Special Advocate, and for amending those procedures as necessary.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 45 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 45

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed transfer to the 
     Kingdom of Saudi Arabia certain defense articles and services.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the issuance of an export 
license with respect to the following proposed exports to the Kingdom 
of Saudi Arabia is prohibited:
            (1) The transfer of the following defense articles, 
        including services and technical data, described in Executive 
        Communication 1416 (EC-1416) submitted to Congress pursuant to 
        section 36(c) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 
        2776(c)) and published in the Congressional Record on June 3, 
        2019: The proposed export of 15,000 120mm M933A1 mortar bombs 
        to Saudi Arabia for end use by the Royal Land Forces of the 
        Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

            Passed the Senate June 20, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. J. RES. 45

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed transfer to the 
     Kingdom of Saudi Arabia certain defense articles and services.
```
FROM: THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT, COUNTY OF DEER LODGE,

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. KEVIN T. MURPHY, Defendant.

NO. DC-84-19 DECISION

DATED this 8th day of March, 1990.

On June 11, 1985, the Defendant was sentenced to Count I, Burglary, ten (10) years; Count II, Theft, ten (10) years; said sentences are to run consecutively; 84 days credit for time served plus any additional time served after sentencing; dangerous offender.

On March 8, 1990, the Defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The Defendant was present and was represented by Lois Adams, of the Montana Defender Project. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the Defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it if such is possible. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

After careful consideration, it is the decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be increased to twenty (20) years for Burglary; and the sentence for the Theft conviction shall remain at ten (10) years; however the two sentences shall run concurrently to each other. The dangerous designation will remain the same as originally imposed.

The reason for the decision is that the total sentence is appropriate considering the defendant’s history. He is being sentenced essentially for one act and that is the Burglary and under that circumstance the sentences shall run concurrently.

Hon. C. B. McNeil dissents. Judge McNeil would affirm the sentence imposed by the sentencing judge based upon the presumption of the correctness of the District Court Judge.
§ 541.64 Decision of the Hearing Administrator. ( a ) At the conclusion of the hearing and following review of all material related to the recommendation for placement of an inmate in a controlled housing status, the Hearing Administrator shall prepare a written decision as to whether this placement is warranted. The Hearing Administrator shall: ( 1 ) Prepare a summary of the hearing and of all information presented upon which the decision is based; and
( 2 ) Indicate the specific reasons for the decision, to include a description of the act, or series of acts, or other reliable evidence on which the decision is based, along with evidence of the inmate's HIV positive status.
( b ) The Hearing Administrator shall advise the inmate in writing of the decision. The inmate shall receive the information described in paragraph (a) of this section unless it is determined that the release of this information could pose a threat to individual safety, or institutional security, in which case that limited information may be withheld. The Hearing Administrator shall advise the inmate that the decision will be submitted for review of the Regional Director in the region where the inmate is located. The Hearing Administrator shall advise the inmate that, if the inmate so desires, the inmate may submit an appeal of the Hearing Administrator's decision to the Regional Director. This appeal, with supporting documentation and reasons, must be filed within five working days of the inmate's receipt of the Hearing Administrator's decision.
( c ) The Hearing Administrator may order the continuation of the inmate in special housing pending review by the Regional Director. The Hearing Administrator should state the reasons for this order in the record of the Hearing.
( d ) The Hearing Administrator shall send the decision, whether for or against placement in a controlled housing status, and supporting documentation to the Regional Director. Ordinarily, this is done within 20 working days after conclusion of the hearing. Any reason for extension is to be documented.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of--

L&M Electric & Plumbing, LLC 

Under Contract No. N00189-11-C-Zl 14 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 59889 

Donald C. Holmes, Esq. 

Paxton Law Group, LLP 

Washington, DC 

Ronald J. Borro, Esq. 

Navy Chief Trial Attorney 

Robyn L. Hamady, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 21 October 2015 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59889, Appeal ofL&M Electric & 

Plumbing, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREYD. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
<PAGE>

                            PREMIER CLASSIC ART, INC.
                               1158 Staffler Road
                          Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807
                               Tel:(908) 526-7388
                               Fax:(908) 595-0072

                                                              September 14, 1999


Giltner B. Stevens
2531 East 32nd Street
Joplin, Missouri 64804

Dear Gil:

         This is to set forth and confirm our agreement pursuant to which
Premier Classic Art, Inc. and/or its wholly owned subsidiary, Cool Classic
Incorporated (collectively, the "Company") will retain your services, with
respect to the marketing of cels and other cartoon art (the "Product") owned
and/or distributed by the Company. In this regard, the following shall
constitute the terms of our agreement:

         1. The term of this Agreement shall be three (3) years (the "Term").

         2. Except for Sales made to Wal Mart resulting from your introduction,
the Company will not market any of the Products to Wal Mart, from the latter of
one (1) year from the date hereof or the date of your last sale to Wal Mart. For
purposes of this Agreement, the term "Sales" is defined as net proceeds to the
Company after deductions for sales returns, sales allowances, fees for shelf
space and cooperative advertising costs.

         3. On any Sales to Wal Mart, you shall be entitled to ten (10%) percent
of the first $5,000,000 in Sales, or any part thereof, and twelve and one half
(12 1/2%) of all Sales to Wal Mart in excess of that amount.

         4. This Agreement with you is exclusive as it relates to the Product
for the Term and you agree that you will not market Product for any other
company during the Term.

         5. In the event Wal Mart purchases in excess of $10,000,000 of Product
in a twenty four (24) month period, the Company shall issue to you a warrant to
purchase 4.9% of the net outstanding shares of common stock of the Company. The
warrants will be exercisable at a price per share equal to eighty (80%) percent
of the average closing bid price of the Company's common stock, for the previous
twenty (20) trading days as reported by NASDAQ, any major exchange on which the
Company's shares are listed or the OTC Bulletin Board, whatever the case may be.





<PAGE>



         If the foregoing meets with your complete approval, kindly indicate
your acceptance by signing you name in the space provided below.


                                                                Sincerely,


                                                                Charles F. Trapp
                                                                President

Agreed and Accepted:



_____________________
Giltner Stevens
§ 551.60 Volunteer community service projects. ( a ) A volunteer community service project is a project sponsored and developed by local government or by a nonprofit charitable organization, submitted to the institution, and recommended by the Warden for approval of the Regional Director. Volunteer community service projects are designed to provide for the public good in keeping with the overall goals of the community, such as community-wide beautification or public safety. The sponsoring organization is responsible for certifying to the Bureau that the community service project does not displace regular employees, supplant employment opportunities ordinarily available within the sponsoring organization, or impair contracts for services. These projects are not work assignments. Any inmate who chooses to participate does so voluntarily, and may not receive performance pay or any other salaried compensation for participation in the project, nor be eligible to submit a claim under the provisions of the Inmate Accident Compensation Program.
( b ) An inmate may volunteer to participate in a community service project by submitting a written request for the Warden's approval. The inmate must have custody classification appropriate for the project and be otherwise eligible for the conditions of the project. The decision of the Warden to approve or disapprove an inmate's request shall be documented in writing.
( c ) An inmate may appeal the Warden's decision through the Administrative Remedy Procedure (see 28 CFR part 542).
[58 FR 5210, Jan. 19, 1993]
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In  connection  with the  Quaterly  Report on Form 10-Q of North Shore
Capital IV, Inc., (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2002, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  I, Gerard Werner,  Chief
Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects,  the consolidated  financial  condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and consolidated  results of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.

Dated: October 3, 2005

/s/ Gerard Werner
Chief Executive Officer
October 3, 2005

This  certification  has been  furnished  solely  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
p. 1



# OAR Box 1147 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 169)IV-E-4 2
Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 4/22/20082:42:56

PM Sheet 169of 242P. 2

§ & • \ UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y 

# <L\y AN N ARBOR
. MICHIGA N 4810 5

MA YI 6 S98 8 OFFIC E O F AI R AN D RADIATIO N

MEMORANDU

M

SUBJECT :

FROM :

TO : Furthe r Briefing s on Onboar d Hardwar e

Joh n F
. Anderson , Senio r Projec t Manage r Standard s Developmen t an d Suppor t Branc h Publi c Docke t A-87-1 1

The Onboar d hardwar e briefing describe d i n m ymemo o f Apri l 20 , 198 8 ha s subsequentl ybee n presente d t o severa l othe r groups . Thes e group s ar e th e Offic e o f Managemen t an d Budge t on Apri l 21 , 1988 , the Governmen t Accounting Offic e an d Nationa l Transportatio n Safet yBoard on Apri l 21 , 1988 , Th e American Automobil e Associatio n on Apri l 27 , 1988 , an d Th e American Petroleu

mInstitut e on Apri l 28 , .1988
. Attendanc e list s for thes e meeting s ar e attached
.

Attachment sP. 3

EPA/OM B Meetin g o n Onboar d Hardwar e

Nam e OR G Phon e Joh n Anderso n Che t Franc e Charle s Gra y Do n Zinge r Joh n Gabrysia k Nichola s Garci a E d Watt s Ar t Fraa s Ric h Therou x A l McGartlan d Dic k Wilso n EP A EP A EP A EP A EP A OM B OM B OM B OM B OM B EP A 313/668

-

313/668

- 313/668

- 202/382

- 313/668

- 202/395

- 020/395

- 202/395

- 202/395

- 202/395

- 202/382

- 449 6

433 8 440 4 •764 7 •422 3 3084 682 7 3084 3084 3084 •764 5P. 4

EPA/GAO/NTS B Meetin g o n Onboar d Hardwar e

Apri l 21 , 198 8

Nam e ORG Phon e Che t Franc e Joh n Anderso n Chuc k Free d Sta n Ritchic k LarryGoldsmit h Ro n Morga n Denn yMatteott i Charle s Grissinge r Merrit t M
. Birk

y Charle s Gray Richar d Wilso n John Gabrysia k EP A EP A EP A GAO GAO GAO GAO GAO NTS B EP A EP A EP A 313/668-433 8

313/668-449 6 202/382-247 9 202/252-063 1 202/252-063 3 202/252-066 6 202/252-065 0 202/252-064 1 202/382-678 5 313/668-440 4 202/382-764 5 313/668-422 3P. 5

EPA/AA AMeetin g o n Onboar d Hardwar e Apri l 27 , 198 8

Nam e Dea n ChiId s Georg e Viverett e Bo b Livinston e John Fobia n WilliamBerma n John Haifle y John Gabrysia k Cheste r Franc e John Anderso n OR G AA A AA A AA APotoma c AA A AA A AA A EP A EPA EP A Traffi c Safet y

Hw yTransp
. ER S Aut o Engrg
. Gov t Affair s Gov t Affair sP. 6

EPA/AP I Meetin g o n

Apri l 28 ,

Onboar d Hardwar e 198 8

Nam e John Anderso n JerryLevin e E d Crocket t Bo b Boek e WilliamMcLeo d Hug h Shanno n Glenn Passavan t Caro l Scot t Che t Franc e Charle s Gray Bil l Koeh l R.J
. Campio n J.S
. Welstand ORG EP A Amoc o Oi l AP I Mobi l Texac o Exxo n EP A AP I EPA EP A Mobi l R& D Exxo n Co,US A Chevro n Researc h Phon e 313/668-449 6 312/856-260 5 202/682-831 8 703/849-418 5 914/253-708 7 201-474-218 7 313/668-440 8 202/682-848 1 313-668-433 8 313/668-440 4 609/423-1040ext277 3 713/656-317 4 415/620-415 0
§ 345.52 Premium pay. Payment of premium pay to selected inmates is authorized. The total number of qualifying inmates may not exceed 15% of first grade inmates at a location. ( a ) *Eligibility.* Inmates in first grade pay status may be considered for premium pay.
( b ) *The selection process.* Candidates for premium pay must be nominated by a foreman on the FPI staff, and recommended on the basis of specific posted criteria by a selection committee assigned by the SOI. ( 1 ) The SOI, as the chief selecting official, must sign approval for all premium pay inmate selections. This authority may not be delegated below the level of Acting SOI.
( 2 ) The selected candidate(s) are notified by the FPI Manager or by a posted list on the FPI bulletin board. A record of the selection and who was on the selection board is kept for documentation purposes. An inmate nominated to be a premium pay inmate may refuse the appointment without prejudice.
( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) *Pay rate.* Premium pay inmates receive a specified amount over and above all other pay and benefits to which they may be entitled (e.g., longevity pay, overtime, piecework rates, etc.). Premium pay is also paid for vacation, holiday, and administrative hours.
( e ) *Duties of premium pay inmates.* Premium pay is a means of recognizing the value of those traits supportive of morale and good institutional adjustment. It is not a form of bonus or incentive pay for highly productive inmates.
( f ) *Transfer status of premium pay inmates.* Premium pay status may not be transferred from institution to institution with the inmate worker. Premium pay status must be earned at each location.
( g ) *Removals from premium pay status.* Removal from premium pay status may occur for failure to demonstrate the premium pay selection traits or for failure to abide by the inmate worker standards set forth in this policy. All removals from premium pay status shall be documented on the inmate's evaluation form. The following conditions also may result in removal from premium pay status: ( 1 ) Any premium pay inmate found to have committed any level 100 or 200 series offense by the DHO is automatically removed from premium pay status whether or not the offense was FPI-related.
( 2 ) Inmates absent from work for more than 30 consecutive calendar days may be removed from premium pay status by the SOI.