alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
JAMES LEWIS GIBSON JR.

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 17

- 1291

_ ____________________________/

Opinion filed August 18, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Baker County

. James Colaw , Judge

.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender,

Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bo ndi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, MAKAR, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
Appendix E3 

Algonquin Ramapo Expansion Project
### §3207. Effect on existing rights; water resources

Nothing in this Act shall be construed as limiting or restricting the power and authority of the United States or—

(1) as affecting in any way any law governing appropriation or use of, or Federal right to, water on lands within the State of Alaska;

(2) as expanding or diminishing Federal or State jurisdiction, responsibility, interests, or rights in water resources development or control, or

(3) as superseding, modifying, or repealing, except as specifically set forth in this Act, existing laws applicable to the various Federal agencies which are authorized to develop or participate in the development of water resources or to exercise licensing or regulatory functions in relation thereto.

(Pub. L. 96–487, title XIII, §1319, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2486.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in provision preceding par. (1) and par. (3), is Pub. L. 96–487, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2371, known as the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3101 of this title and Tables.
§ 814.8 Representation at the hearing. ( a ) The creditor agency may be represented by legal counsel.
( b ) The employee may be self-represented or may be represented by an individual of the employee's choosing, at the employee's expense.
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 136 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Safe Digging Month. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 2, 2019 

Mr. WICKER (for himself, Ms. CANTWELL, Mrs. FISCHER, and Ms. 

DUCKWORTH) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

APRIL 11, 2019 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Safe Digging 

Month. 

Whereas each year, the underground utility infrastructure of 

the United States, including pipelines, electric, gas, telecommunications, water, sewer, and cable television lines, 

is jeopardized by unintentional damage caused by those 

who fail to have underground lines located prior to 

digging; 

Whereas some utility lines are buried only a few inches underground, making the lines easy to strike, even during 

shallow digging projects; 

Whereas digging prior to locating underground utility lines 

often results in unintended consequences, such as service 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 136 ATS 

interruption, environmental damage, personal injury, and 

even death; 

Whereas the month of April marks the beginning of the peak 

period during which excavation projects are carried out 

around the United States; 

Whereas in 2002, Congress required the Department of 

Transportation and the Federal Communications Commission to establish a 3-digit, nationwide, toll-free number to be used by State ‘‘One Call’’ systems to provide 

information on underground utility lines; 

Whereas in 2005, the Federal Communications Commission 

designated ‘‘811’’ as the nationwide ‘‘One Call’’ number 

for homeowners and excavators to use to obtain information on underground utility lines before conducting excavation activities; 

Whereas the 1,700 members of the Common Ground Alliance, who are dedicated to ensuring public safety, environmental protection, and the integrity of services, promote the national ‘‘Call Before You Dig’’ campaign to increase public awareness about the importance of homeowners and excavators calling 811 to find out the exact 

location of underground lines; 

Whereas the Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty, and Job 

Creation Act of 2011 (Public Law 112–90; 125 Stat. 

1904) affirmed and expanded the ‘‘One Call’’ program by 

eliminating exemptions given to local and State government agencies and their contractors regarding notifying 

‘‘One Call’’ centers before digging; and 

Whereas the Common Ground Alliance has designated April 

as ‘‘National Safe Digging Month’’ to increase awareness 

of safe digging practices across the United States and to 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 136 ATS 

celebrate the anniversary of 811, the national ‘‘Call Before You Dig’’ number: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of National 

3 Safe Digging Month; and 

4 (2) encourages all homeowners and excavators 

5 throughout the United States to call 811 before 

6 digging. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 85733 / April 26, 2019

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-18097

In the Matter of 

CHINA GREENSTAR CORPORATION,

CORTRONIX BIOMEDICAL ADVANCEMENT

 TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

HW HOLDINGS, INC., and 

MICROELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY COMPANY

NOTICE THAT INITIAL DECISION HAS BECOME FINAL

The time for filing a petition for review of the initial decision in this proceeding has 

expired. No such petition has been filed by China Greenstar Corporation, Cortronix Biomedical 

Advancement Technologies, Inc., HW Holdings, Inc., or Microelectronics Technology 

Company, and the Commission has not chosen to review the decision on its own initiative.

Accordingly, notice is hereby given, pursuant to Rule 360(d) of the Commission's Rules 

of Practice,1that the initial decision of the administrative law judge has become the final 

decision of the Commission with respect to China Greenstar Corporation, Cortronix Biomedical 

Advancement Technologies, Inc., HW Holdings, Inc., and Microelectronics Technology 

Company.2The order contained in that decision is hereby declared final. The initial decision 

ordered that, pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrations

of each class of registered securities of China Greenstar Corporation, Cortronix Biomedical 

 

1

 17 C.F.R. § 201.360(d).

2

 China Greenstar Corp., Cortronix Biomedical Advancement Technologies, Inc., HW 

Holdings, Inc., and Microelectronics Tech. Co., Initial Decision Release No. 1335 (Dec. 18, 

2018), 2018 WL 6617791. The Central Index Key numbers are: 1551454 for China Greenstar 

Corporation; 1380713 for Cortronix Biomedical Advancement Technologies, Inc.; 1396118 for 

HW Holdings, Inc.; and 1329136 for Microelectronics Technology Company.
2

Advancement Technologies, Inc., HW Holdings, Inc., or Microelectronics Technology Company

are revoked. The revocations are effective as of April 29, 2019.

For the Commission, by the Office of the General Counsel, pursuant to delegated 

authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

 Acting Secretary
#### § 544.75 Disciplinary action.

As with other mandatory programs, such as work assignments, staff may take disciplinary action against an inmate lacking a GED credential or high school diploma if that inmate refuses to enroll in, and to complete, the mandatory 240 instructional hours of the literacy program.
#### Hal R. Ginsburg et al., Appellants, v Ock-A-Bock Community Association, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[825 NYS2d 119]

In an action, inter alia, to compel the determination of claims to certain real property pursuant to RPAPL article 15, the plaintiffs appeal (1) from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Henry, J.), dated February 7, 2005, as denied their motion for a preliminary injunction and (2), as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the same court dated August 18, 2005, as, upon renewal, adhered to the original determination.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated February 7, 2005 is dismissed as that order was superseded by the order dated August 18, 2005, made upon renewal; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated August 18, 2005 is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the defendants payable by the plaintiffs.

On a motion for a preliminary injunction, the movant has the burden of demonstrating, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) the movant will likely succeed on the merits of the action, (2) the movant will suffer irreparable injury absent the issuance of a preliminary injunction, and (3) the balance of equities is in favor of the movant *(see*CPLR 6301; *Aetna Ins. Co. v Capasso,*75 NY2d 860 [1990]; *W.T. Grant Co. v Srogi, 52*NY2d 496 [1981]; *Price Paper & Twine Co. v Miller,*182 AD2d 748 [1992]; *Albini v Solork Assoc.,*37 AD2d 835 [1971]). The determination to grant or deny a preliminary injunction rests in the sound discretion of the court *(see Ying Fung Moy v Hohi Umeki,*10 AD3d 604 [2004]).

In the instant action, regarding the rights of access to a beach, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction, as well as, upon renewal, adhering to that determination, on the ground that they failed to demonstrate they would suffer irreparable *638injury absent the grant of the injunction *(see Sehweizer v Town of Smithtown,*19 AD3d 682 [2005]). Florio, J.P., Krausman, Lunn and Covello, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2


           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection  with the Annual  Report of Golden  Enterprises,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Patty
Townsend, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: August 22, 2008



/s/Patty Townsend
-----------------
Patty Townsend
Vice-President and Principal Financial Officer




A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Golden Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Golden Enterprises,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon
request.

                                       60
Order entered May 6 , 2020

In The



### Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00784

- CR

ARMANDO LOPEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F 18

- 76836

- M

O RDER

Before the Court is the State ’ s May 4, 2020 motion for ext e n sion of time to

file its brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief received with the

mo tion filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
----

----

**SECURITIES      AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**

**Washington,      D.C. 20549**

**FORM      8-K**

**CURRENT      REPORT**

**Pursuant      to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934**

**Progenics      Pharmaceuticals, Inc.**

| Delaware                                                                                        |   | **000-23143**                          |   | **13-3379479**                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
| (State                or other jurisdictionof                incorporation)                     |   | (CommissionFile                Number) |   | (IRS                EmployerIdentification                No.) |
|                                                                                            |   |                                   |   |                                                           |
| 777                Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, New York                                 |   | 10591                                  |
| (Address                of principal executive offices)                                         |   | (Zip                Code)              |
| Registrant's                telephone number, including area code (914)                789-2800 |

*see *

----

----

----

**Item      7.01. Regulation FD Disclosure**

**Item      9.01   Financial Statements and Exhibits.**

**Exhibit      No.**
**Description**

----

**SIGNATURES**

----
§ 68.18 Discovery—general provisions. ( a ) *General.* Parties may obtain discovery by one or more of the following methods: depositions upon oral examination or written questions; written interrogatories; production of documents or things, or permission to enter upon land or other property, for inspection and other purposes; physical and mental examinations; and requests for admissions. The frequency or extent of these methods may be limited by the Administrative Law Judge upon his or her own initiative or pursuant to a motion under paragraph (c) of this section.
( b ) *Scope of discovery.* Unless otherwise limited by order of the Administrative Law Judge in accordance with the rules in this part, the parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, which is relevant to the subject matter involved in the proceeding, including the existence, description, nature, custody, condition, and location of any books, documents, or other tangible things, and the identity and location of persons having knowledge of any discoverable matter.
( c ) *Protective orders.* Upon motion by a party or the person from whom discovery is sought, and for good cause shown, the Administrative Law Judge may make any order that justice requires to protect a party or person from annoyance, harassment, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense, including one or more of the following: ( 1 ) The discovery not be had;
( 2 ) The discovery may be had only on specified terms and conditions, including a designation of the time, amount, duration, or place;
( 3 ) The discovery may be had only by a method of discovery other than that selected by the party seeking discovery; or
( 4 ) Certain matters not relevant may not be inquired into, or that the scope of discovery be limited to certain matters.
( d ) *Supplementation of responses.* A party who has responded to a request for discovery with a response that was complete when made is under no duty to supplement his or her response to include information thereafter acquired, except as follows: ( 1 ) A party is under a duty to supplement timely his or her response with respect to any question directly addressed to: ( i ) The identity and location of persons having knowledge of discoverable matters; and
( ii ) The identity of each person expected to be called as an expert witness at the hearing, the subject matter on which he or she is expected to testify, and the substance of his or her testimony.
( 2 ) A party is under a duty to amend timely a prior response if he or she later obtains information upon the basis of which: ( i ) He or she knows the response was incorrect when made; or
( ii ) He or she knows that the response, though correct when made, is no longer true and the circumstances are such that a failure to amend the response is in substance a knowing concealment.
( 3 ) A duty to supplement responses may be imposed by order of the Administrative Law Judge upon motion of a party or agreement of the parties.
[Order No. 2203-99, 64 FR 7076, Feb. 12, 1999]
# ·"lr!!~ s10-100303-044

CONTROL NO. P.O. Box2950 Hagatfia, Guam96932 TEL: (67I)472-8931'FAX: (67I)477-4826.EMAIL: govemoJ:@mail.gov.gu
Felix 

### P. Camacho Governor Michael

### W. Cruz,M.D. LieutenantGovernor 

## 1 BFEB 20m

The Honorable Ray LaHood Secretary U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

### Hafa Adai! I am writing in support of Continental Micronesia's application to provide daily nonstop servicebetween Guahan and Tokyo Haneda airport.

New air service to Haneda, which is scheduled to begin later this year, is made possible by the achievements ofyour officein securing a wide ranging open skies agreement with Japan. I applaud your efforts on the historic open skies agreement and now urge you to select Continental Micronesia to provide service connecting Guahan's tourism and trade industry with Tokyo'scentral airport.

Guahan's economy in part depends upon tourist traffic from points across the Asian region, with Japan being a critical tourist market for the island. Haneda is ideally situated for the Japanese tourist who lives in central and southern/western Tokyo, and obtaining U.S. carrier scheduled service to/from Haneda will be a boost to Guahan's travel marketing efforts.

Tourism expenditures currently represent $1.2 billion in our local economy or an**_~_** ...**~_** ..**estimat~d40%** QfGuaban's**Gro~sJsIMdProduct** (alP)

..Visitor spending alone. accounts for 95% of this total. Based on historical trends, Japan (80%) and Korea (10%) today comprise 90% ofthe 1.2 million annual visitors to the island. These are mature markets that forecast to decline in the future due to their aging demographics and heightened regional competition from lowercostAsian resort destinations.

As Continental Micronesia is the only carrier operating a hub on Guahan, Continental Micronesia is the right choice for new Haneda service. Island communities around Guahan such as Saipan will also benefit from one-stop connections at the Antonio B. Won PatInternational Airportto Haneda.

### Increased competition by U.S. carriers andthe opportunity to choose among Continental Micronesia service and air services offered by Japanese airlines is important to our island communities. Continental Micronesia's commitment to the Japanese market and our region is proven by the carrier's recent addition offlights to Fiji and Hong Kong. Service to Haneda further supplements the airline's growth, and therefore employment and economic benefits for Guahan.

I urge you to award Tokyo Haneda service to Continental Micronesia and to the Western Pacific. 

# q stnseru yan Magilliet,



# _**,~~~"f.<~--.'** FELIX P. CAMACHO 

### IMaga' when Guahan Governor ofGuahan
#### § 71.36 Post-hearing briefs.

ALJ may require the parties to file post-hearing briefs. In any event, any party may file a post-hearing brief. The ALJ shall fix the time for filing such briefs, not to exceed 60 days from the date the parties receive the transcript of the hearing or, if applicable, the stipulated record. Such briefs may be accompanied by proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. The ALJ may permit the parties to file reply briefs.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 16-0625V 

Filed: September 13, 2016

Unpublished

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

CHERYL ZANGHI, * 

 * 

 Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

 * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; Shoulder

v. * Injury Related to Vaccine Administration

 * (“SIRVA”); Special Processing Unit

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“SPU”)

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * 

 * 

 Respondent. * 

 * 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Leah V. Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for petitioner.

Ryan D. Pyles, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

On May 26, 2016, Cheryl Zanghi (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation 

under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et 

seq.,

2 (the “Vaccine Act” or “Program”). Petitioner alleges that as a result of receiving 

the influenza (“flu”) vaccine on December 2, 2014, she suffered a shoulder injury that 

was caused-in-fact by her vaccination. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the 

Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) of the Office of Special Masters.

On September 12, 2016, respondent filed a Rule 4(c) report conceding

entitlement to compensation in this case. Rule 4(c) Rep. at 1. Respondent concluded, 

based on her evaluation of the evidence, that petitioner’s injury is consistent with a 

shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), and that the injury was 

 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012)(Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

caused-in-fact by her vaccination. Id. at 3. Respondent stated that she did not identify 

any other causes for petitioner’s SIRVA, and that the evidence of record demonstrates 

petitioner has suffered the residual effects of her condition for more than six months. Id. 

Petitioner has therefore satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation. Id.

In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence of record, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

Chief Special Master
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 29, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 29, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17D0493. WESLEY W. WILSON v. BERENICE GUERRERO.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 16A10596
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                            HENRY L. CREEL CO., INC.
                           Certified Public Accountant
                                 (216) 491-0800
                               FAX (216) 491-0803

May 14, 2002


To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of Henry L. Creel Co., Inc., Certified Public Accountant, consents to
the inclusion of its report dated May 11, 2002 on the Financial Statements of
AuGRID of Nevada, Inc. (the "Company") included in the Company's report on Form
10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2002.

Respectfully,

/s/ Henry L. Creel

Henry L. Creel, CPA









                    3587 LEE ROAD SHAKER HEIGHTS, OHIO 44120