alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CS317837-Q

Health Department

HEALTH 

DEPARTMENT

HEALTH 

DEPARTMENT

持续监测您的健康。如果您的症状恶化或变得严重,

您应前往就医。严重症状包括呼吸困难、胸部持续疼

痛或压力、意识模糊、不能清醒或保持清醒、或嘴唇

或面部发蓝。

如果您已被确诊感染

COVID-19,一名公共卫生

工作人员将致电您以了解

您的健康状况。

他们将询问在您患病并

可能已传播 COVID-19 

给其他人期间您曾接触

过谁并去过哪些地方。

接触者追踪:做好您范围内的工作,

保持您的家人、朋友和社区安全。

如果您已被确诊感染 COVID-19,则在接触者追踪期间您可预期发生的事项。

如果您在自我隔离期间

需要支持或协助,

卫生部或本地社区组织

可能能够提供协助。

您与公共卫生工作人员

分享的任何信息为机密。

这意味着您的个人和医

疗信息将被保密。

1

3

您还将被要求留在家中并自我隔离,如果您还 2

未这样做的话。

自我隔离是指待在家中一个特定的房间、远离

其他人和宠物,且如果可能,使用单独的浴室。

自我隔离有助于减缓 COVID-19 扩散,并可保持

您的家人、朋友和社区安全。

cdc.gov/coronavirus

https://chinese.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/daily-life-coping/contact-tracing-infographic.html

卫生

部

卫生

部

卫生部

Language: Chinese
接触者追踪:如果您可能已与确诊 COVID-19 的某人接触,

您可预期哪些事项 

如果您已与确诊 COVID-19 的某

人有密切接触,则一名公共卫生

工作人员将致电您以通知您可能

已暴露 COVID-19。

2

1

3

从您可能暴露 COVID-19 

最后一天开始,您应待在

家中并自我隔离 14 天。

自我隔离是指一直待在家中、

监测您的健康并与其他人保

持社交距离(至少 6 英尺)。

HEALTH 

DEPARTMENT

公共卫生工作人员可提供有关在您区域进行

COVID-19 测试的信息。

如果您需要有关自我隔离的支持或协助,您的

卫生部或社区组织可能能够提供协助。

您应每天两次测定您的体温,观察是否有发烧和

COVID-19 其它症状,且如果您出现症状,应通

知您的卫生部。

如果您在 14 天自我隔离期间患病,您应通知卫生部,且如果您的症

状恶化或变得严重,应寻求医疗协助。急诊警告体征包括呼吸困难、

胸部持续疼痛或压力、意识模糊、不能清醒或保持清醒、或嘴唇或面

部发蓝。

我们所有人一起合作可帮助减慢 COVID-19 扩散。

做好您范围内的工作,保持您的家人和社区安全:

接听电话以减慢扩散。

CS317837-Q

4

5

您与公共卫生工作人

员分享的任何信息

为机密。

这意味着您的个人和

医疗信息将被保密。

卫生

部

卫生部

卫生

部

卫生

部

卫生

部

接听

电话
Certique-se de que tapa o nariz e a boca para ajudar a proteger os outros. 

Pode estar infectado e não apresentar sintomas.

Fique a 6 tapa (2 comprimentos de braço) de distância das outras pessoas.

E use uma proteção facial de pano

Pratique o distanciamento social

Ajude a proteger-se a si e aos outros contra a COVID-19

cdc.gov/coronavirus

CS 317297-H 05/29/2020
SCM
                       Securities Counseling & Management
                21131 Northeast 24th Court, Miami, Florida 33180


March 16, 2001

Mr. Bradley Cassel, President
Life Petroleum, Inc.
6790 SW 76 Terrace
South Miami, Fl 33143

Dear Mr. Cassel:

This letter,  when signed by you will confirm our  agreement of August 15, 2000.
Securities  Counseling & Management,  Inc.,  ("SCM") will assist Life Petroleum,
Inc., ("LIFE") on an as needed basis in executing its plan of reorganization.

Specifically,  SCM will  assist  Life  with all  aspects  of its  reorganization
including  preparing a structure of  reorganization  for the  company.  SCM will
provide  assistance  to Life  in  identifying  professionals  who  will  provide
services to Life, such as CPA's , attorneys, and Transfer Agents. SCM will serve
as an  intermediary  with these and other  professionals.  SCM will also help to
identify potential  investors and provide other services as needed,  however SCM
will not be responsible for fund raising activities.

SCM's fee for these services will be 9.9%, or 16,500,000  shares of the stock of
the reorganized Life. The stock will be issued under Rule 701.

If you have any questions please feel free to call me.

Sincerely,

/s/ Michael H. Jordan
-----------------------
Michael H. Jordan, President

Agreed and Accepted


/s/ Bradley Cassel, President
---------------------
Bradley Cassel, President
Life Petroleum, Inc.


<PAGE>
§ 2.38 Community supervision by U.S. Probation Officers. ( a ) Pursuant to sections 3655 and 4203(b)(4) of title 18 of the U.S. Code, U.S. Probation Officers shall provide such parole services as the Commission may request. In conformity with the foregoing, probation officers function as parole officers and provide supervision to persons released by parole or as if on parole (mandatory release) under the Commission's jurisdiction.
( b ) A parolee may be transferred to a new district of supervision with the permission of the probation officers of both the transferring and receiving district, provided such transfer is not contrary to instructions from the Commission.
[44 FR 3409, Jan. 16, 1979]
Mallattoowwan Vaayrasii koroonaa 

(COVID-19)

cdc.gov/coronavirus

316475-S 06/02/2020

Mallattoowwan COVID-19, kan armaan gadii of keessaa qabu 

dandauu beeki:

*Namni tokko mallattoowwan COVID-19 akeekkachiisa ariifachiisaa 

ta’an eegairratti mulate gargarsa fayyaa hattattamaa argadhuu.

• Hafuura baafachuu dadhabuu

• laphee keessatti dhukkubbi ykn 

dhiibbaa cimaa itti-fufiinsaa qabu

• Joonja'iinsa haaraa

• Dammaquu ykn dammaqanii 

turuu dadhabuu

• Hidhii ykn fuula halluu samii

Qufa'aa Laqada/qorra namatti 

dhaga’amuu

Dhukkubbii maashaa

Rakkina hargansuu 

ykn hafuura baafachuu 

dadhabuu*

Miiraa dhandhama ykn 

foolii dhabuu

Dhukkubbii qoonqoo

Mallattoowwan salphaa irraa hanga hamaa ta’uu, fi vaayirasicha 

COVID-19 dhaf saaxilamtee erga qabamatee guyyaa 2-14 keessatti 

mulachuu dandauu. 

Tarreeffamni kun mallattoowwan mul’achu danda'an hunda kan hammatee miti. Maaloo 

mallattoowwan biroo baayyee cimaa ykn yaaddessaa ta'aniif hakima kee kan yeroo maraatti bilbili.

Ho'iinsa qaamaa/leygdaa
#### § 115.293 Audits of standards.

The agency shall conduct audits pursuant to §§ 115.401 through 115.405.
EX-10.17



 Exhibit 10.17 
 SUMMARY OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR COMPENSATION POLICY 
 The Addus HomeCare
Corporation (the “Corporation”) independent director compensation policy provides that independent directors receive an annual retainer of $45,000 for service on the Corporation’s board of directors, $1,500 per in person
scheduled board meeting (whether attended in person or telephonically) and $750 per telephonic board meeting. 
 The
chairman of the Corporation’s board of directors receives an additional annual retainer of $20,000. The chairmen of the Corporation’s audit committee, compensation committee and nominating and corporate governance committee receive an
additional annual retainer of $15,000, $10,000 and $7,500, respectively. Independent directors who serve on the audit committee receive $1,500 per audit committee meeting attended and independent directors who serve on other committees receive
$1,000 per committee meeting attended. Independent directors are also reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred in attending board of directors meetings, committee meetings and stockholder meetings. 

In addition, each independent director is entitled to receive an annual grant of restricted shares of the Corporation’s common stock
valued at $40,000, which shall be awarded following the Corporation’s annual meeting each year beginning with the Corporation’s 2016 annual meeting. Each grant of restricted stock to an independent director shall vest on the first
anniversary of the date of issuance. 
 The foregoing independent director compensation is effective March 1, 2016 and is
subject to review and adjustment on the recommendation of the Corporation’s nominating and corporate governance committee.
#### § 286.109 Assignment for oral hearing.

Except when there are no material facts in dispute, when a person does not consent to the shortened procedure, the Commission will assign the proceeding for hearing as provided by subpart E of part 385 of this chapter. Notwithstanding a person's not giving consent to the shortened procedure, and instead seeking assignment for hearing as provided for by subpart E of part 385 of this chapter, the Commission will not assign the proceeding for a hearing when no material facts are in dispute. The Commission may also, in its discretion, at any stage in the proceeding, set the proceeding for hearing.
#### § 551.35 Withdrawal of approval of an organization.

The Warden may withdraw approval of an inmate organization for reasons of the security, good order, and discipline of the institution, or in accordance with § 551.34(e).
§ 36.211 Maintenance of accessible features. ( a ) A public accommodation shall maintain in operable working condition those features of facilities and equipment that are required to be readily accessible to and usable by persons with disabilities by the Act or this part.
( b ) This section does not prohibit isolated or temporary interruptions in service or access due to maintenance or repairs.
( c ) If the 2010 Standards reduce the technical requirements or the number of required accessible elements below the number required by the 1991 Standards, the technical requirements or the number of accessible elements in a facility subject to this part may be reduced in accordance with the requirements of the 2010 Standards.
[Order No. 1513-91, 56 FR 35592, July 26, 1991, as amended by AG Order No. 3181-2010, 75 FR 56251, Sept. 15, 2010]
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23




                            HENRY L. CREEL CO., INC.
                           Certified Public Accountant
                                 (216) 491-0800
                               FAX (216) 491-0803


October 29, 2001


To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of Henry L. Creel Co., Inc., Certified Public Accountant, consents to
the inclusion of its report dated October 29, 2001 on the Financial Statements
of AuGRID of Nevada, Inc. (the "Company") included in Amendment No. 1 to the
Company's report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2001.

Respectfully,

/s/ Henry L. Creel

Henry L. Creel, CPA







                    3587 LEE ROAD   SHAKER HEIGHTS, OHIO 44120
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 r 2013



### New Manufactured Homes

All Avg. Sales Price 65,400 $ 64,700 $ $63,100 62,800 $ 60,500 $ 62,200 $ 64,000 $ Avg. Square Feet 1,600 1,565 1,530 1,520 1,465 1,480 1,470 Avg. Cost per Sq. Ft. 40.88 $ 41.34 $ 41.24 $ 41.32 $ 41.30 $ 42.02 $ 43.54 $

Single Avg. Sales Price 37,300 $ 38,000 $ $39,600 39,500 $ 40,600 $ 41,100 $ 42,200 $ Avg. Square Feet 1,100 1,100 1,120 1,110 1,115 1,100 1,100 Avg. Cost per Sq. Ft. 33.91 $ 34.55 $ 35.35 $ 35.59 $ 36.41 $ 37.36 $ 38.36 $

Double Avg. Sales Price 74,200 $ 75,800 $ $74,500 74,500 $ 73,900 $ 75,700 $ 78,600 $ Avg. Square Feet 1,775 1,765 1,735 1,730 1,705 1,725 1,720
Av g . Cost per Sq. Ft. 41.80 $ 4 2.95 $ 4 2.94 $ 4 3.06 $ 4 3.34 $ 43.88 $ 4 5.70 $


### Housing Starts vs. MH Shipments (Thousands of units)
New Single Family Housing Starts 1,046 622 445 471 431 535 618
Percent of Total 92% 88% 90% 90% 89% 91% 91%
Manufactured Home Shipments Shipped 96 82 50 50 52 55 60
Percent of Total 8% 12% 10% 10% 11% 9% 9%

Total 1,142 704 4 95 521 483 590 678


### New Single-Family

Site-Built Homes Sold (Home and Land Sold as Package) Avg. Sales Price 313,600 $ 292,600 $ 270,900 $ 272,900 $ 267,900 $ 292,200 $ 324,500 $
Derived Avera g e Land Price 84,268 $ 74,209 $ 67,718 $ 66,340 $ 59,950 $ 69,115 $ 75,071 $

Price of Structure Avg. Square Feet 2,479 2,473 2,422 2,457 2,494 2,585 2,662
Av g . Price per Sq Ft. (excl. land) 92.51 $ 88.31 $ 83.89 $ 84.07 $ 83.38 $ 86.30 $ 93.70 $


### Manufactured Home Shipments

Total 95,752 81,907 49,717 50,046 51,618 54,881 60,228 Single-Section 30,737 30,384 18,568 20,373 25,291 25,629 28,239 Multi-Sectio n 65,015 51,523 31,149 29,673 26,237 29,252 31,989


### New Manufactured Homes Placed ( f

or Residential Use)

Located in Communities 26% 26% 22% 25% 26% 29% 30% Located on Private Property 74% 74% 78% 75% 74% 71% 70%
Titled as Personal Property 64% 62% 67% 73% 75% 77% 78% Titled as Real Estate 28% 28% 28% 21% 17% 15% 14%

r Revised

Source: These data are produced by the U.S. Comme rce Department's Census Bureau from a survey sponsored by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 

### Cost & Size Comparisons: New Manufactured Homes and New Si ngle-Family Site-Built Homes (2007 - 2013)
### §19f. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 90–209, §2, Dec. 18, 1967, 81 Stat. 656, related to the Board of the National Park Foundation. See section 101112 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
### §3641. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated from time to time such sums as may be necessary for carrying out the purposes and provisions of the Treaty and this chapter including—

(a) necessary travel expenses of the Commissioners, Panel members, alternate Commissioners, alternate Panel members, United States members of joint technical committees established under article IV of the Treaty, and advisory committee members in accordance with the Federal Travel Regulations and sections 5701, 5702, 5704 through 5708, and 5731 of title 5;

(b) the United States share of the joint expenses of the Commission: Provided, That the United States Commissioners and Panel members and alternates shall not, with respect to commitments concerning the United States share of the joint expenses of the Organization, be subject to section 262b of title 22 insofar as it limits the authority of United States representatives to international organizations with respect to such commitments;

(c) amounts for research, enhancement, and other activities necessary to carry out the purposes of the Treaty and this chapter; and

(d) such amounts as may be due to settle accounts upon termination of the International Pacific Salmon Fisheries Commission.

(Pub. L. 99–5, §12, Mar. 15, 1985, 99 Stat. 14.)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL A. CARNACCHI,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

U.S. BANK N.A. ND; U.S. BANCORP,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 12-17293

D.C. No. 3:11-cv-06339-LB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Laurel D. Beeler, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted September 23, 2014*** 

Before: W. FLETCHER, RAWLINSON, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Michael A. Carnacchi appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”)

FILED

OCT 10 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28

U.S.C. § 636(c). 

 *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Clark

v. Yosemite Cmty. Coll. Dist., 785 F.2d 781, 784 (9th Cir. 1986), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Carnacchi’s RICO claim as barred by

the doctrine of claim preclusion because Carnacchi’s RICO claim was based on the

same primary right asserted in a prior state court action that was dismissed without

leave to amend. See id. (federal courts look to state law to determine the preclusive

effect of a state court judgment); Mycogen Corp. v. Monsanto Co., 51 P.3d 297,

301, 306-07 (Cal. 2002) (setting forth elements of the doctrine of claim preclusion

under California’s primary rights theory); Keidatz v. Albany, 249 P.2d 264, 265

(Cal. 1952) (the sustaining of a demurrer and an adjudication that the facts alleged

do not state a claim is a judgment on the merits and bars a second action unless

new facts cure defects in the original pleading).

Contrary to Carnacchi’s contention, the public policy exception to

California’s claim preclusion law does not apply in this case. See Clark, 785 F.2d

at 788 (relief is granted in “unusual circumstances” to prevent “manifest injustice”

and “appears to be limited to situations where the doctrine of [claim preclusion]

prevents relitigation of pure questions of law” (citation and internal quotation

marks omitted)).

We reject Carnacchi’s contention regarding the ultra vires doctrine.

2 12-17293
Carnacchi’s pending motions for judicial notice and oral argument are

denied as unnecessary.

AFFIRMED.

3 12-17293
#### § 15.16 Recommended decision.

Within a reasonable time after the close of the record of the hearings conducted under § 15.14, the administrative law judge shall certify the record to the adjudicating official and shall submit to the adjudicating official written findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a recommended decision. The administrative law judge shall promptly make copies of the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommended decision available to the parties and the Secretary.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 12, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-30457

KENNETH DALE HOWE; GWENDOLYN SUE HOWE

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

JOHN E HUGHES; WARD TWO CEMETERY ASSOCIATION; POLICE

JURY OF MOREHOUSE PARISH

Defendants - Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:05-CV-143

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

After reviewing the record in this case and considering the briefs of the

parties and arguments of counsel, we affirm the District Court’s Judgment

essentially for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and

Recommendation of July 13, 2005 and March 28, 2006. 

Gwendolyn Howe alleges that John Hughes accused her of“discrepancies”

in cemetery board finances and of “hiring” her husband. Further, she claims
No. 06-30457

2

Hughes stated that he would bring the matter to the attention of the district

attorney. Ms. Howe claims that these statements, made in regards to her

termination of employment, violated her constitutionally protected liberty

interest in her reputation and the right to clear her name. These state and

federal due process claims fail, however, because, atthe very least, she admitted

to the truth of Hughes’s statements; there were financial discrepancies and she

did hire her husband, even if only on a volunteer basis. Codd v. Velger, 429 U.S.

624, 627-28 (1977); Rosenstein v. Dallas, 876 F.2d 392, 395-96 (5th Cir. 1989).

Her argument that Louisiana state due process law, as it relates to this claim,

is broader than federal law is unavailing. State v. Smith, 614 So.2d 778, 780

(La. Ct. App. 1993).

Ms. Howe’s state law defamation claim also fails because she admitted to

the truth of Hughes’s statement. Further, the public statement made by Hughes

does not imply that Ms. Howe’s actions were criminal. The statement merely

suggests that Hughes believed the matter warranted further investigation by the

district attorney to determine whether Ms. Howe’s actions were criminal.

Therefore, Ms. Howe’s admissions need not admit to criminal conduct to admit

to the truth of Hughes’s statements. Based on her admissions and without a

presumption of defamation, Ms. Howe is unable to support her claim.

Lastly, the district court did not abuse its discretion by declining to

exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Kenneth Howe’s state law defamation

claim. That claim is not part of the same case or controversy as Ms. Howe’s

underlying federal claim.

AFFIRMED.
Veillez à vous couvrir le nez et la bouche pour aider à protéger les autres. 

Vous pourriez être infecté(e) et ne pas présenter de symptômes.

Respectez une distance de 2 mètres avec les autres.

Et portez un masque en tissu.

Pratiquez la distanciation sociale.

Aidez à vous protéger et à protéger les autres du COVID-19

cdc.gov/coronavirus

CS 317297-E 29/05/2020
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 2113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-655]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act; Notice of Meeting

DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, January 19, 2011, 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time.

PLACE: Commission Meeting Room on the First Floor of the EEOC Office 
Building, 131 ``M'' Street, NE., Washington, DC 20507.

STATUS: The meeting will be open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Open Session

    1. Announcement of Notation Votes, and
    2. Human Trafficking and Forced Labor--Invited Panelists

    Note: In accordance with the Sunshine Act, the meeting will be 
open to public observation of the Commission's deliberations and 
voting. Seating is limited and it is suggested that visitors arrive 
30 minutes before the meeting in order to be processed through 
security and escorted to the meeting room. (In addition to 
publishing notices on EEOC Commission meetings in the Federal 
Register, the Commission also provides information about Commission 
meetings on its Web site, eeoc.gov., and provides a recorded 
announcement a week in advance on future Commission sessions.)

    Please telephone (202) 663-7100 (voice) and (202) 663-4074 (TTY) at 
any time for information on these meetings. The EEOC provides sign 
language interpretation and Communication Access Realtime Translation 
(CART) services at Commission meetings for the hearing impaired. 
Requests for other reasonable accommodations may be made by using the 
voice and TTY numbers listed above. CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE 
INFORMATION: Stephen Llewellyn, Executive Officer on (202) 663-4070.

    Dated: This Notice Issued January 10, 2011.
Stephen Llewellyn,
Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2011-655 Filed 1-10-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6570-01-P
### SUBCHAPTER LIX–UU—MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Subchapter was formerly classified to subchapter CXXXIX (§460bbbb et seq.) of this chapter prior to transfer to this subchapter.

Pub. L. 96–428, which enacted this subchapter, originally established the Martin Luther King, Junior, National Historic Site, which is listed in a table of National Historic Sites under section 320101 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs. The amendments made by Pub. L. 115–108 effectively redesignated the site as the Martin Luther King, Jr. National Historical Park, after which the text of Pub. L. 96–428 was set out as this subchapter.
### §1a–4. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 91–383, §7, as added Pub. L. 94–458, §2, Oct. 7, 1976, 90 Stat. 1940, related to uniform allowance.
#### § 33.53 Participation by faith-based organizations.

The funds provided under this part shall be administered in compliance with the standards set forth in part 38 (Equal Treatment for Faith-based Organizations) of this chapter.

[Order No. 2703-2004, 69 FR 2838, Jan. 21, 2004]