alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,485,408
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         239,980
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               305,890
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                68,910
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         7,793,699
<LOANS>                                     13,114,029
<ALLOWANCE>                                    147,235
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,862,878
<DEPOSITS>                                  15,294,956
<SHORT-TERM>                                 6,966,008
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            272,885
<LONG-TERM>                                    704,673
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    225,000
<COMMON>                                        53,340
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,302,417
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              24,862,878
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                928,219
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              425,208
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                15,923
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,369,350
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             490,608
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             824,338
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          545,012
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   25,034
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              14,075
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                714,769
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                268,191
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     203,053
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   203,053
<EPS-BASIC>                                      27.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    27.97
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.82
<LOANS-NON>                                     23,558
<LOANS-PAST>                                    35,899
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 2,975
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               140,608
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   26,406
<RECOVERIES>                                     7,999
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              147,235
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           147,235
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Email Communication with Rick Stevens, OST Biosolids Coordinator & Kimberly Bartell,

ERG

From: Bartell, Kimberly

To: Stevens, Richard

Sent: 6/13/13 3:59 PM

Subject: RE: Follow up on TNSSS

Hi Rick,

Thank you for getting back to me. I will be in touch later this month to set up a review schedule

for the biosolids section in July.

Thanks again,

Kimberly

From: Stevens, Richard

, Stevens.Rick@epa.gov

To: Bartell, Kimberly

Sent: 6/13/13 3:4 8 PM

Subject: RE: Follow up on TNSSS

Hi Kimberly,

We are currently evaluating TNSSS pollutants. There are no conclusions at this time as some of

the risk evaluations are undergoing internal review, with peer review to follow. Risk evaluations

for most TNSSS pollutants will take place at a later date.

I don't believe you can consider POTWs confidential information; you should be fine to publish.

Yes, I will be available to review the biosolids section in July.

Thanks,

Rick Stevens

From: Bartell, Kimberly

To: Stevens, Richard

Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 2:30 PM

Subject: Follow up on TNSSS

Rick,

As I stated in my message to you, I work for Eastern Research Group and we have assisted EPA

with the Effluent Guideline Annual Review each year with Bill Swietlik. In January 2012, Ellie

Codding from ERG contacted you about a biosolids analysis we were conducting as part of the

a nnual review and you provided a list of facilities that were sampled as part of the Targeted

National Sewage Sludge Survey.We are now finalizing the review and I have the following questions for you:

1. Currently on the TNSSS webpage it states that E PA plans to evaluate the pollutants identified

by the survey as being present in sewage sludge and conduct an exposure and hazard

assessment for these pollutants if sufficient data are available. Are there any updates to this plan?

If so, have any conclusi ons been reached?

2. In our biosolids analysis section we have a table that lists the TNSSS

- sampled POTWs that

receive wastewater from industrial facilities reporting to the Toxic Release Inventory. This table

includes the POTWs names and states where t hey are located. Before publication, we wanted to

check with you about the confidentiality of the TNSSS

- sampled POTW names. Is it ok to include

this table in the report?

3. Finally, Bill Swietlik would like you to review our biosolids analysis section be fore it is

finalized. Would you be available in early July to review this section?

Please call if it would be easier to discuss these questions on the phone, my number is 517

- 515

-

1721.

Thank you,

Kimberly

---------------------------------------- Kimberly D. Bartell

Environmental Engineer

Eastern Research Group, Inc.

kimberly.bartell@erg.com

Phone: 517

- 515

- 1721
#### Rickey MAZIQUE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Dan L. Dove, Warden, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 01-7846.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 25, 2002.

Decided May 2, 2002.

Melisa W. Gay, Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, for Appellant. J. Strom Thurmond, Jr., United States Attorney, Barbara M. Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Rickey Mazique appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) without prejudice. The court agreed with a magistrate judge’s conclusion that Mazique, a federal inmate, failed to demonstrate a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001) would be an inadequate or ineffective means to address his claims. Additionally, the district court properly noted that *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review. *See United States v. Sanders,*247 F.3d 139, 151 (4th Cir.2001). Because we find no reversible error, we affirm on the on the reasoning of the district court. *Mazique v. United States,*No. CA-01-343 (D.S.C. Aug. 30, 2001).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*

*

 Moreover, even if Mazique could raise an *Apprendi*claim on collateral review in a § 2241 petition, we note he could not prevail on his claim, as he was convicted under both 21 *437U.S.C.A. §§ 841 and 846 (West 1999 & Supp. 2001), each of which permits a twenty-year statutory maximum sentence. Because the district court could have imposed partially concurrent sentences for these convictions in order to reach Mazique’s 263-month term of incarceration, Mazique's sentence does not offend *Apprendi. See United States v. White,*238 F.3d 537, 543 (4th Cir.2001).
### §426i. Protection of monuments, etc.

If any person shall willfully destroy, mutilate, deface, injure, or remove any monument, column, statue, memorial structure, or work of art that shall be erected or placed upon the grounds of the battlefield by lawful authority, or shall willfully destroy or remove any fence, railing, inclosure, or other work for the protection or ornament of said battlefield, or any portion thereof; or shall willfully destroy, cut, hack, bark, break down, or otherwise injure any tree, bush, or shrubbery that may be growing upon said battlefield, or shall cut down or fell or remove any timber, battle relic, tree, or trees growing or being upon such battlefield, except by permission of the Secretary of the Interior, or shall willfully remove or destroy any breastworks, earthworks, walls, or other defenses or shelter, or any part thereof, constructed by the armies formerly engaged in the battle on the lands or approaches to the battlefield, any person so offending shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof before any court of competent jurisdiction, shall for each and every such offense be fined not less than $5 nor more than $100.

(Mar. 3, 1927, ch. 374, §10, 44 Stat. 1401; Ex. Ord. No. 6166, §2, June 10, 1933; Ex. Ord. No. 6228, §1, July 28, 1933; Pub. L. 86–443, §2, Apr. 22, 1960, 74 Stat. 82.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Battlefield" substituted in text for "park" in view of redesignation of Stones River National Military Park as Stones River National Battlefield by Pub. L. 86–443. See section 426l of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Transfer of administrative functions of park, see note set out under section 426 of this title.
#### §§ 36.106-36.199 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Private  Access,  Inc., on
Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2002 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  B.
Stephen Bailey,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge  and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 69.300 Professional and technical services. ( a ) The prohibition on the use of appropriated funds, in § 69.100 (a), does not apply in the case of any reasonable payment to a person, other than an officer or employee of a person requesting or receiving a covered Federal action, if the payment is for professional or technical services rendered directly in the preparation, submission, or negotiation of any bid, proposal, or application for that Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement or for meeting requirements imposed by or pursuant to law as a condition for receiving that Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
( b ) The reporting requirements in § 69.110 (a) and (b) regarding filing a disclosure form by each person, if required, shall not apply with respect to professional or technical services rendered directly in the preparation, submission, or negotiation of any commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan.
( c ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, “professional and technical services” shall be limited to advice and analysis directly applying any professional or technical discipline. For example, drafting or a legal document accompanying a bid or proposal by a lawyer is allowable. Similarly, technical advice provided by an engineer on the performance or operational capability of a piece of equipment rendered directly in the negotiation of a contract is allowable. However, communications with the intent to influence made by a professional (such as a licensed lawyer) or a technical person (such as a licensed accountant) are not allowable under this section unless they provide advice and analysis directly applying their professional or technical expertise and unless the advice or analysis is rendered directly and solely in the preparation, submission or negotiation of a covered Federal action. Thus, for example, communications with the intent to influence made by a lawyer that do not provide legal advice or analysis directly and solely related to the legal aspects of his or her client's proposal, but generally advocate one proposal over another are not allowable under this section because the lawyer is not providing professional legal services. Similarly, communications with the intent to influence made by an engineer providing an engineering analysis prior to the preparation or submission of a bid or proposal are not allowable under this section since the engineer is providing technical services but not directly in the preparation, submission or negotiation of a covered Federal action.
( d ) Requirements imposed by or pursuant to law as a condition for receiving a covered Federal award include those required by law or regulation, or reasonably expected to be required by law or regulation, and any other requirements in the actual award documents.
( e ) Persons other than officers or employees of a person requesting or receiving a covered Federal action include consultants and trade associations.
( f ) Only those services expressly authorized by this section are allowable under this section.
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

Washington, D.C. 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 91868 / May 12, 2021

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension of trading 

in the securities of Quantum Materials Corp. (QTMM) commencing at 9:30 a.m. EDT on May 

13, 2021 and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EDT on May 26, 2021:

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of the foregoing company due 

to a lack of current and accurate information about the company because it has not filed certain 

periodic reports with the Commission. This order was entered pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act).

The Commission cautions brokers, dealers, shareholders and prospective purchasers that they 

should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available 

information and any information subsequently issued by this company.

Brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11, at 

the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered relating to the securities 

of the subject company unless and until the broker or dealer has strictly complied with all of the 

provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is required by the rule, it 

should refrain from entering quotations relating to the securities of this company that has been 

subject to the trading suspension until such time as it has familiarized itself with the rule and is 

certain that all of its provisions have been met. Any broker or dealer with questions regarding

the rule should contact the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, DC 

at (202) 551-5777. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation which is in violation of the rule,

the Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement action. 

If any broker, dealer or other person has any information which may relate to this matter, they 

should immediately communicate it to the Delinquent Filings Branch of the Division of 

Enforcement at (202) 551-5466, or by e-mail at DelinquentFilings@sec.gov.
Order entered October 24, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00894-CV

ERIC DRAKE, Appellant

V.

SUNHEE PI, CHONG PARK, AND KRISTINA KASTL, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-09-01374-E

ORDER

Before Justices Fillmore, Lewis, and Brown

Before the Court is the October 9, 2013 motion to dismiss filed by appellees Sunhee Pi 

and Chong Park. Appellees Pi and Park move to dismiss the appeal because the notice of appeal 

is untimely as to them. Appellant did not file a response to this motion. 

A notice of appeal is due thirty days after the date the judgment is signed or ninety days 

after the date the judgment is signed if a party timely files a post-judgment motion that extends 

the appellate timetable. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a). Without a timely notice of appeal, this 

Court lacks jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(b). The judgment relating to appellees Pi and 

Park was signed on February 13, 2012. Appellant filed his notice of appeal on June 5, 2013, 

more than one year past the deadline. 
Because the notice of appeal was untimely, this Court lacks jurisdiction over appellant’s 

appeal as to appellees Pi and Park. Accordingly, we GRANT the motion and DISMISS this 

appeal as to appellees, Sunhee Pi and Chong Park. This appeal continues as to appellee Kristina 

Kastl.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 12

                              THE GILLETTE COMPANY

                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

Dollars in millions

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                        2001        2000          1999         1998        1997
                                                                    ------------ ----------  -----------  ----------- -----------
Earnings:
<S>                                                             <C>                 <C>           <C>          <C>         <C>
    Income from continuing operations before income taxes       $        1,342       1,288        1,912        1,656       2,065
    Interest expense                                                       145         223          136           94          78
    Interest portion of rental expense                                      31          25           20           17          16
    Amortization of capitalized interest                                     9           6            5            4           3


                                                                   ------------ -----------  -----------  -----------  ----------
    Earnings available for fixed charges                        $        1,527       1,542        2,073        1,771       2,162
                                                                   ============ ===========  ===========  ===========  ==========

Fixed Charges:
     Interest expense                                            $          145         223          136           94          78
     Interest capitalized                                                    11          23           13           18          10
     Interest portion of rental expense                                      31          25           20           17          16

                                                                   ------------- -----------  -----------  ----------- -----------
     Total fixed charges                                         $          187         271          169          129         104
                                                                   ============= ===========  ===========  =========== ===========


 RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                                         8.2         5.7         12.3         13.7        20.8
                                                                   ============= ===========  ===========  =========== ===========
</TABLE>
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
  Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund XLVII
Project No. 13743-000.FFP Missouri 16, LLC
Project No. 13753-000.Solia 7 Hydroelectric, LLC
Project No. 13769-000.Three Rivers Hydro LLC
Project No. 13785-000.
 The Commission has received four preliminary permit applications deemed filed on May 18, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.,[1]
                    
                     for proposed projects to be located at the Army Corps of Engineers' Opekiska Lock and Dam on the Monongahela River, in Monongahela County, West Virginia. The applications were filed by Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund XLVII for Project No. 13743, FFP Missouri 16, LLC, for Project No. 13753, Solia 7 Hydroelectric, LLC, for Project No. 13769 and Three Rivers Hydro LLC for Project No. 13785.[2] On March 24, 2011, at 10 a.m. (eastern time), the Secretary of the Commission, or her designee, will conduct a random drawing to determine the filing priority of the applicants identified in this notice. The Commission will select among competing permit applications as provided in section 4.37 of its regulations.[3]
                    
                     The priority established by this drawing will be used to determine which applicant, among those with identical filing times, will be considered to have the first-filed application. The drawing is open to the public and will be held in room 2C, the Commission Meeting Room, located at 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426. A subsequent notice will be issued by the Secretary announcing the results of the drawing. Dated: March 15, 2011. Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., Deputy Secretary.


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         Under the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, any document received after regular business hours is considered filed at 8:30 a.m. on the next regular business day. 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(2) (2010). Back to Citation
 2.
    
                         Opekiska Hydro, LLC, also filed a permit application to study the same site for Project No. 13791, which is deemed filed on May 19, 2010. Back to Citation
 3.
    
                         18 CFR 4.37 (2010). Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2011-6769 Filed 3-22-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
§ 35.161 Telecommunications. ( a ) Where a public entity communicates by telephone with applicants and beneficiaries, text telephones (TTYs) or equally effective telecommunications systems shall be used to communicate with individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing or have speech impairments.
( b ) When a public entity uses an automated-attendant system, including, but not limited to, voicemail and messaging, or an interactive voice response system, for receiving and directing incoming telephone calls, that system must provide effective real-time communication with individuals using auxiliary aids and services, including TTYs and all forms of FCC-approved telecommunications relay systems, including Internet-based relay systems.
( c ) A public entity shall respond to telephone calls from a telecommunications relay service established under title IV of the ADA in the same manner that it responds to other telephone calls.
[AG Order No. 3180-2010, 75 FR 56184, Sept. 15, 2010]