alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit




Exhibit 10.2.4





February 24, 2016
CorEnergy Infrastructure Trust, Inc.
1100 Walnut Street, Suite 3350
Kansas City, Missouri  64106


Re:    Management Fee under Management Agreement for CorEnergy Infrastructure Trust, Inc.


Ladies and Gentlemen:


Reference is made to that certain Management Agreement, dated as of May 8, 2015 and effective as of May 1, 2015, by and between CorEnergy Infrastructure Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and Corridor InfraTrust Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Manager”) (as may be further amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Management Agreement”).  Capitalized terms used and not defined herein are used as defined in the Management Agreement.  The Company and the Manager have entered into this Letter Agreement to waive a portion of the payment right set forth in Section 8(b) of the Management Agreement applicable to the dividend paid during the calendar year ending December 31, 2015.  


This letter documents that the Manager has recommended, and the Company has agreed, that the Manager shall only be paid an Incentive Fee of $145,425 as a result of the dividend paid during the Company’s December 31, 2015 calendar year.  This agreed upon incentive fee payment constitutes a waiver by the Manager of $133,194 of Incentive Fee that would otherwise be due to the Manager from the Company.


The Company and the Manager mutually acknowledge and agree that this modification to the Incentive Fee payment right represents a discretionary action on the part of the Manager that is not required under the terms of the Management Agreement and that, except as specifically set forth herein, all other provisions of the Management Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and shall not be affected by this Letter Agreement.  Please acknowledge your agreement to the foregoing by signing this Letter Agreement as indicated below.




Very truly yours,	
		
	CORRIDOR INFRATRUST MANAGEMENT, LLC:

	 
	 

	By:
	/s/  Richard C. Green, Jr.

	 
	Name: Richard C. Green, Jr.

	 
	Title: Managing Director






Agreed and accepted:


	
		
	CORENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE TRUST, INC.:

	 
	 

	By:
	/s/  David J. Schulte

	 
	Name: David J. Schulte

	 
	Title: President









1100 Walnut Street Suite 3350 Kansas City, MO 64106 | Main: 816-875-3705 | Fax: 816-875-5875 | corenergy.corridortrust.com
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDGAR JESUS VARGAS-LEON, AKA 

Edgar J. Vargas Leon, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 14-73482 

Agency No. A044-569-849 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 3, 2020**

Before: MURGUIA, CHRISTEN, and BADE, Circuit Judges. 

Edgar Jesus Vargas-Leon, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of 

removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 9 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the 

agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 

2006). We deny the petition for review.

In his opening brief, Vargas-Leon does not challenge the agency’s denial of 

his asylum and withholding of removal claims. See Lopez-Vasquez v. Holder, 706 

F.3d 1072, 1079-80 (9th Cir. 2013) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a 

party’s opening brief are waived). Thus, we deny the petition for review as to 

asylum and withholding of removal.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because 

Vargas-Leon failed to show it is more likely than not he will be tortured by or with 

the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Mexico. See Aden v. 

Holder, 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009); see also Wakkary v. Holder, 558 

F.3d 1049, 1067-68 (9th Cir. 2009) (no likelihood of torture).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

MICHAEL B. LOYD,

Claimant

- Appellant

v.

DENIS MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent

- Appellee

______________________

2021

- 1384

______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in No. 19

- 2574, Senior Judge Robert N. Davis.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

K ENNETH M. C ARPENTER
, Law Offices of Carpenter Chartered, Topeka, KS, argued for claimant

- appellant.

I GOR H ELMAN
, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent

- appellee. Also represented by
B RIAN M. B OYNTON
, M ARTIN F. H OCKEY
, J R
., L OREN M ISHA P REHEIM ; C HRISTINA L YNN G REGG
, B RIAN D. G RIFFIN , Office Case: 21-1384 Document: 29 Page: 1 Filed: 11/15/2021of General Counsel, United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Washington, DC

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN
, T ARANTO
, and C HEN
, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

November 15, 2021 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court Case: 21-1384 Document: 29 Page: 2 Filed: 11/15/2021
### §4223. Prohibited acts

Except as provided in section 4222(e) of this title, it is unlawful for any person—

(1) to import raw ivory from any country other than an ivory producing country;

(2) to export raw ivory from the United States;

(3) to import raw or worked ivory that was exported from an ivory producing country in violation of that country's laws or of the CITES Ivory Control System;

(4) to import worked ivory, other than personal effects, from any country unless that country has certified that such ivory was derived from legal sources; or

(5) to import raw or worked ivory from a country for which a moratorium is in effect under section 4222 of this title.

(Pub. L. 100–478, title II, §2203, Oct. 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 2320.)
### SUBCHAPTER LXXVII—PICTURED ROCKS NATIONAL LAKESHORE
Exhibit (32)(i)(b)

STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

The undersigned chief financial officer of Great Lakes Chemical Corporation hereby certifies that this Annual Report on Form 10-K as amended
for the year ended December 31, 2004 ("Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and
that information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Great Lakes Chemical Corporation.

| |  | /s/JEFFREY POTRZEBOWSKIJeffrey Potrzebowski, Chief Financial Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | Dated:                                                              

---



QuickLinks
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois  60604

Submitted May 21, 2009

Decided May 21, 2009

Before

WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

JOHN L. COFFEY, Circuit Judge

                  DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge

No. 08‐2307

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff‐Appellee,

v.

COREY TAYLOR,

Defendant‐Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Northern District of Indiana,

Hammond Division.

2:06 CR 232 PS

Philip P. Simon,

Judge.

O R D E R

Corey Taylor pleaded guilty to distributing crack, 21 U.S.C. 841(a)(1), and was

sentenced to 135 months’ imprisonment.  As part of his plea agreement he waived his right

to appeal.  Taylor appealed anyway, but his appointed lawyers have moved to withdraw

because they cannot discern a nonfrivolous basis for appeal.  See Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967).  Taylor has not responded to counsel’s submission under Circuit Rule 51(b).

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
No. 08‐2307 Page 2

We limit our review to the potential issues counsel identify.  United States v. Schuh, 289 F.3d

968, 973‐74 (7th Cir. 2002).

Taylor does not wish to have his guilty plea set aside, so counsel properly refrain

from examining the plea colloquy or the voluntariness of the plea.  See United States v. Knox,

287 F.3d 667, 671 (7th Cir. 2002).  Accordingly, the plea agreement is enforceable and so is

the appellate waiver, see United States v. Wilson, 481 F.3d 475, 483 (7th Cir. 2007); United

States v. Hare, 269 F.3d 859, 860‐61 (7th Cir. 2001), which renders this appeal frivolous.

Counsel’s motion is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
#### § 541.61 Standard for placement in controlled housing status.

An inmate may be placed in a controlled housing status when there is reliable evidence causing staff to believe that the inmate engages in conduct posing a health risk to others. This evidence may be the inmate's behavior, or statements of the inmate, or other reliable evidence.
### §1169. Regulations

The Secretary is authorized to prescribe such regulations as he deems necessary to carry out the provisions of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 89–702, title II, §211, as added Pub. L. 98–129, §2, Oct. 14, 1983, 97 Stat. 844.)
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 724 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 724

    To amend the Controlled Substances Act to establish additional 
  registration requirements for prescribers of opioids, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 7, 2019

Mrs. Gillibrand (for herself and Mr. Gardner) introduced the following 
    bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Controlled Substances Act to establish additional 
  registration requirements for prescribers of opioids, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``John S. McCain Opioid Addiction 
Prevention Act''.

SEC. 2. REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS FOR PRESCRIBERS.

    Section 303 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 823) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(l)(1) Creating obligations for practitioners, only as described 
herein, the Attorney General shall not register, or renew the 
registration of, a practitioner under subsection (f) who is licensed 
under State law to prescribe controlled substances in schedule II, III, 
or IV, unless the practitioner submits to the Attorney General, for 
each such registration or renewal request, a certification that the 
practitioner, during the applicable registration period, will not 
prescribe any schedule II, III, or IV opioid, other than an opioid 
prescription described in paragraph (3), for the initial treatment of 
acute pain in an amount in excess of the lesser of--
            ``(A) a 7-day supply (for which no refill is available); or
            ``(B) an opioid prescription limit established under State 
        law.
    ``(2) In this subsection, the term `acute pain'--
            ``(A) means pain with abrupt onset and caused by an injury 
        or other process that is not ongoing; and
            ``(B) does not include--
                    ``(i) chronic pain;
                    ``(ii) pain being treated as part of cancer care;
                    ``(iii) hospice or other end-of-life care; or
                    ``(iv) pain being treated as part of palliative 
                care.
    ``(3) An opioid prescription described in this paragraph is a 
prescription--
            ``(A) for a schedule II, III, or IV opioid drug approved by 
        the Food and Drug Administration for an indication for the 
        treatment of addiction; and
            ``(B) that is for the treatment of addiction.''.
                                 <all>
```
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 15 

Commending the Clemson University Tigers football team for winning the 

2019 College Football Playoff National Championship. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 10, 2019 

Mr. GRAHAM (for himself and Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina) submitted the 

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Commending the Clemson University Tigers football team 

for winning the 2019 College Football Playoff National 

Championship. 

Whereas, on Monday, January 7, 2019, the Clemson University Tigers football team won the 2019 College Football 

Playoff National Championship (in this preamble referred 

to as the ‘‘championship game’’) by defeating the University of Alabama by a score of 44 to 16 at Levi’s Stadium 

in Santa Clara, California; 

Whereas the Tigers finished the championship game with 482 

yards of total offense on 63 plays; 

Whereas the victory by the Tigers in the championship 

game— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

SRES 15 ATS 

(1) made Clemson the first Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS)-level team to finish a season 15–0 since the 

University of Pennsylvania in 1897; and 

(2) marked the second time in 3 years that Clemson 

won a National Championship game; 

Whereas the head coach of Clemson, Dabo Swinney, has been 

an outstanding role model to the Clemson players and the 

Clemson community; 

Whereas Trevor Lawrence, the first true freshman starter to 

win a national title since 1985, gave an outstanding performance by throwing for 347 yards and 3 touchdowns; 

Whereas Travis Etienne had 14 carries for 86 yards including 2 rushing touchdowns and a passing touchdown; 

Whereas the Clemson University football team displayed outstanding dedication, teamwork, and sportsmanship 

throughout the 2018 collegiate football season in achieving the highest honor in college football; and 

Whereas the Tigers have brought pride and honor to the 

State of South Carolina: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) commends the Clemson University Tigers 

3 for winning the 2019 College Football Playoff Na4 tional Championship; 

5 (2) recognizes the on-field and off-field achieve6 ments of the players, coaches, and staff of the 

7 Clemson football team; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

SRES 15 ATS 

1 (3) respectfully requests that the Secretary of 

2 the Senate transmit an enrolled copy of this resolu3 tion to— 

4 (A) the President of Clemson University, 

5 James P. Clements; and 

6 (B) the head coach of the Clemson Univer7 sity football team, Dabo Swinney. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### Sidney M. Pitt *et al. v*. David M. Swearingen.

1. Appeal *bond—in forcible entry and detainer.*The sixth section of the “Act to amend chapter 43, of the Revised Statutes of 1845, entitled ‘Forcible Entry and Detainer,’ ” in force February 16,1865, does not repeal that part of the amended statute Avhicli requires the appeal bond in oases of forcible entry aud detainer to contain a clause for the payment of all rents becoming due, etc., but simply requires the bond to contain additional guaranties for the benefit of the plaintiff.

2. *Same—recovery of rent in suit on.*When the appeal bond given by the defendant in an action of forcible entry and detainer contains no clause for the payment of rent, as required by the statute, or any words from which the payment of rent can be implied, no recovery of rent can be had in a suit upon the same.

*251Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Champaign *county;*the Hon. C. B. Smith, Judge, presiding.

This was an action of debt, by David M. Swearingen against Sidney M. Pitt and John Phiper, upon an appeal bond, given on appeal in a forcible entry and detainer suit. The bond was the common, ordinary appeal bond, conditioned for prosecuting the appeal with effect, and the payment of the judgment, costs, etc., rendered on the trial or dismissal of the appeal. In the circuit court the plaintiff recovered for rents of the premises.

Mr. J. S. Wolfe, for the plaintiffs in error.

Mr. S. F. White, for the defendant in error.

Per Curiam :

The sixth section of the “Act to amend chapter 43, of the Revised Statutes of 1845, entitled ‘Forcible Entry and Detainer/ ” in force February 16, 1865, does not repeal so much of the statute amended as requires, in cases of appeals in forcible entry and detainer, that the bond shall contain a clause conditioned for the payment of all rents becoming due, etc., but simply contains additional guaranties, to be observed by the defendant appealing, for the benefit of the plaintiff.

The bond in suit in the present case contains no clause providing for the payment of rent, as required by that statute, nor can it, by legal implication, be held to embrace rents.

The judgment of the court below is therefore reversed, and the cause remanded.

*Judgment*reversed.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Administrative Proceedings Rulings

Release No. 6835 / November 3, 2021

Administrative Proceeding

File No. 3-18483

In the Matter of

Timothy C. Scarpino

Order for Status Report

In 2018, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ordered that a 

hearing be held in this matter “following the entry of a final judgment against 

the last remaining defendant(s) in any action(s) arising out of or related to the 

facts in this Order.” Timothy C. Scarpino, Securities Act of 1933 Release No. 

10496, 2018 SEC LEXIS 1130, at *21 (May 15, 2018). A related action, SEC v. 

Villena, No. 18-cv-4309 (S.D.N.Y.), has been pending since then.

I ORDER the Division to submit a status report by November 17, 2021,

about Villena and any other actions arising out of or related to the facts in the 

order instituting proceedings.

/s/ James E. Grimes

Administrative Law Judge
Case 15-33894-KLP Doc 3 Filed 08/03/15 Entered 08/03/15 12:36:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
Stay home, get rest, and hydrate

If you have or think you have COVID-19

Do it for Yourself and Your Friends

cdc.gov/coronavirus

CS 318104-A 07/09/2020

And later you can...
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
 Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund XXXVII
Project No. 13738-000.FFP Missouri 6, LLC
Project No. 13761-000.Solia 1 Hydroelectric, LLC
Project No. 13770-000.
 The Commission has received three preliminary permit applications deemed filed on May 18, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.,[1]
                    
                     for proposed projects to be located at the Army Corps of Engineers' Emsworth Back Channel Dam on the Ohio River, in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. The applications were filed by Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund XXXVII for Project No. 13738, FFP Missouri 6, LLC, for Project No. 13761, and Solia 1 Hydroelectric, LLC for Project No. 13770. On March 24, 2011, at 10 a.m. (eastern time), the Secretary of the Commission, or her designee, will conduct a random drawing to determine the filing priority of the applicants identified in this notice. The Commission will select among competing permit applications as provided in section 4.37 of its regulations.[2]
                    
                     The priority established by this drawing will be used to determine which applicant, among those with identical filing times, will be considered to have the first-filed application. The drawing is open to the public and will be held in room 2C, the Commission Meeting Room, located at 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426. A subsequent notice will be issued by the Secretary announcing the results of the drawing. Dated: March 15, 2011. Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., Deputy Secretary.


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         Under the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, any document received after regular business hours is considered filed at 8:30 a.m. on the next regular business day. 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(2) (2010). Back to Citation
 2.
    
                         18 CFR 4.37 (2010). Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2011-6773 Filed 3-22-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
§ 94.102 Definitions. As used in this subpart: Crime victim or victim of crime means a person who has suffered physical, sexual, financial, or emotional harm as a result of the commission of a crime.
*Director* means the Director of OVC.
Direct services or services to victims of crime means those services described in 34 U.S.C. 20103(d)(2), and efforts that— ( 1 ) Respond to the emotional, psychological, or physical needs of crime victims;
( 2 ) Assist victims to stabilize their lives after victimization;
( 3 ) Assist victims to understand and participate in the criminal justice system; or
( 4 ) Restore a measure of security and safety for the victim.
*OVC* means the Office for Victims of Crime, within the United States Department of Justice's Office of Justice Programs.
*Project* means the direct services project funded by a grant under this program, unless context indicates otherwise.
*Spousal abuse* includes domestic and intimate partner violence.
State Administering Agency or SAA is the governmental unit designated by the chief executive of a State to administer grant funds under this program.
*Sub-recipient* means an entity that is eligible to receive grant funds under this program from a State under this subpart.
*Victim of child abuse* means a victim of crime, where such crime involved an act or omission considered to be child abuse under the law of the relevant SAA jurisdiction. In addition, for purposes of this program, victims of child abuse may include, but are not limited to, child victims of: Physical, sexual, or emotional abuse; child pornography-related offenses; neglect; commercial sexual exploitation; bullying; and/or exposure to violence.
*Victim of federal crime* means a victim of an offense in violation of a federal criminal statute or regulation, including, but not limited to, offenses that occur in an area where the federal government has jurisdiction, whether in the United States or abroad, such as Indian reservations, national parks, federal buildings, and military installations.
*VOCA* means the Victims of Crime Act of 1984, Public Law 98-473 (Oct. 12, 1984), as amended.
VOCA funds or VOCA funding means grant funds (or grant funding) under this program.
*VOCA grant* means the annual grant from OVC to a State under this program.
[81 FR 44528, July 8, 2016, as amended at 88 FR 3656, Jan. 20, 2023]