alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**LAND ROVER EMISSION DEFECT INFORMATION REPORT NO. L10042D1C**

**Causal part name: DIAGNOSTIC MODULE – TANK LEAKAGE (DMTL) Causal part number: WTR500020** 

Issued: 29 March 2011 Page 1 of 2 Code of Federal Regulations. Title 40. Part 85. Subpart T. §85.1903 - Emissions Defect Information Report

(c)(1) The manufacturers corporate name.

Land Rover.

(c)(2) A description of the defect.

A defective DMTL causes M.I.L. illumination and sets code P0442. Defect investigation revealed that DMTLs were contaminated with carbon debris during the assembly process at the supplier. During DMTL operation, the carbon debris affects the reference current used to set code P0442 thereby causing false M.I.L. illumination.

( c)(3) A description of each class or category of vehicles potentially affected by the defect including make, model, model year, and such other information as may be required to identify these vehicles.

See table in section (c)(4)(i) below.

(c)(4) For each class or category of vehicle or engine described in response to paragraph (c)(3) of this section, the following shall also be provided:

(c)(4)(i) The number of vehicles or engines known or estimated to have the defect and an explanation of the means by which this number was determined.

MODEL

YEAR TEST GROUP MODEL SALES CLAIMS /

DEFECTS

2007 7LRXT04.2001 Range Rover; Range Rover Sport 11335 134

2007 7LRXT04.4001 Range Rover Sport; LR3 13736 682

2008 8LRXT03.2001 LR2 14672 184

2008 8LRXT04.2001 Range Rover; Range Rover Sport 19898 164

2008 8LRXT04.4001 Range Rover Sport; LR3 21138 667

2009 9LRXT03.2001 LR2 3418 43

2009 9LRXT04.2001 Range Rover; Range Rover Sport 4298 29

2009 9LRXT04.4001 Range Rover Sport; LR3 7072 109

The above data was taken from Land Rover's warranty tracking report dated 2010Q3.

(c)(4)(ii) The address of the plant at which the potentially defective vehicles or engines were produced.

Land Rover Solihull Plant, Birmingham, England.

Land Rover Halewood Plant, Liverpool, England. 

### EPA EDIR # 4178 (a)
Received: March 29, 2011**LAND ROVER EMISSION DEFECT INFORMATION REPORT NO. L10042D1C**

**Causal part name: DIAGNOSTIC MODULE – TANK LEAKAGE (DMTL) Causal part number: WTR500020** 

Issued: 29 March 2011 Page 2 of 2 (c)(5) An evaluation of the emissions impact of the defect and a description of any driveability problems which a defective vehicle might exhibit.

A defective DMTL prevents successful completion of the leak check cycle; it cannot cause an evaporative leak.

There is no adverse impact on driveability associated with this issue.

This issue illuminates the M.I.L.

(c)(6) Available emissions data which relate to the defect.

Not applicable as there is no adverse impact on emissions caused by a defective DMTL.

(c)(7) An indication of any anticipated manufacturer follow-up.

During June 2008 assembly process improvements were made by the supplier to eliminate the contamination problem. The newer uncontaminated parts are used when repairing vehicles at dealerships.

Related emissions defect information report.

L10042D0A, L10042D1B 

### EPA EDIR # 4178 (a)
Received: March 29, 2011
### §230d. Hunting, fishing, and trapping; public safety; consultation

Within the Barataria Preserve Unit, the Secretary shall permit hunting, fishing (including commercial fishing), and trapping in accordance with applicable Federal and State laws on land, and interests in land and water managed by the Secretary, except that the Secretary may designate zones where and establish periods when no hunting, fishing, or trapping shall be permitted for reasons of public safety. Except in emergencies, any regulations of the Secretary promulgated under this section shall be put into effect only after consultation with the appropriate fish and game agency of Louisiana.

(Pub. L. 95–625, title IX, §905, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3536; Pub. L. 111–11, title VII, §7105(d), (f)(2)(A), Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1192, 1193.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2009—Pub. L. 111–11, in first sentence, substituted "Barataria Preserve Unit" for "Barataria Marsh Unit" and "on land, and interests in land and water managed by the Secretary, except that the Secretary" for ", except that within the core area and on those lands acquired by the Secretary pursuant to section 230a(c) of this title, he".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### "Secretary" Defined

Secretary means the Secretary of the Interior, see section 2 of Pub. L. 95–625, set out as a note under section 45f of this title.
### §426j. Authorization of appropriation; fixing of boundaries as condition to purchase of lands

The sum of $100,000, or so much thereof as may be necessary, is authorized to be appropriated, out of any moneys in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to be expended for the purposes of sections 426 to 426j of this title: Provided, That no obligation for the purchase of lands shall be incurred until the commission has fixed the boundaries of said battlefield.

(Mar. 3, 1927, ch. 374, §11, 44 Stat. 1401; Pub. L. 86–443, §2, Apr. 22, 1960, 74 Stat. 82.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Battlefield" substituted in text for "park" in view of redesignation of Stones River National Military Park as Stones River National Battlefield by Pub. L. 86–443. See section 426l of this title.
#### § 542.18 Response time.

If accepted, a Request or Appeal is considered filed on the date it is logged into the Administrative Remedy Index as received. Once filed, response shall be made by the Warden or CCM within 20 calendar days; by the Regional Director within 30 calendar days; and by the General Counsel within 40 calendar days. If the Request is determined to be of an emergency nature which threatens the inmate's immediate health or welfare, the Warden shall respond not later than the third calendar day after filing. If the time period for response to a Request or Appeal is insufficient to make an appropriate decision, the time for response may be extended once by 20 days at the institution level, 30 days at the regional level, or 20 days at the Central Office level. Staff shall inform the inmate of this extension in writing. Staff shall respond in writing to all filed Requests or Appeals. If the inmate does not receive a response within the time allotted for reply, including extension, the inmate may consider the absence of a response to be a denial at that level.
### §425m. Retained rights

#### (a) Retention of use and occupancy

With the exception of property which the Secretary determines is necessary for development or public use, the owner or owners of improved property acquired pursuant to sections 425k to 425o of this title may retain a right of use and occupancy of such improved property for noncommercial residential purposes for a definite term of not more than twenty-five years, or for a term ending at the death of the owner or the owner's spouse. The owner shall elect the term to be reserved, except that if the owner is a corporation, trust, partnership, or any entity other than an individual, the term shall not exceed twenty-five years. Ownership shall be determined as of June 1, 1989. Unless the property is wholly or partially donated, the Secretary shall pay to the owner the fair market value of the property on the date of such acquisition, less the fair market value of the right retained by the owner.

#### (b) Terms and conditions

Any rights retained pursuant to this section shall be subject to such terms and conditions as the Secretary may prescribe and may be terminated by the Secretary upon his determination and after reasonable notice to the owner thereof that such property is being used for any purpose which is incompatible with the administration, protection, or public use of the park. Such right shall terminate by operation of law upon notification of the owner by the Secretary and tendering to the owner an amount equal to the fair market value of that portion of the right which remains unexpired.

#### (c) "Improved property" defined

As used in this section, the term "improved property" means a year-round noncommercial single-family dwelling together with such land, in the same ownership as the dwelling, as the Secretary determines is reasonably necessary for the enjoyment of the dwelling for single-family residential use.

(Pub. L. 101–214, §4, Dec. 11, 1989, 103 Stat. 1850.)
TS-CCGL81

Attachment #8 

Pt. 2, Sec. B, End 

Worker/Occupational Exposure and Environmental Release Information on the New 

Chemical Substance at Industrial Sites Controlled by Others
### §245. Administration, protection, and development

The Administration, protection, and development of the aforesaid park shall be exercised under the direction of the Secretary of the Interior by the National Park Service, subject to the provisions of the Act of August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535), entitled "An Act to establish a National Park Service, and for other purposes",1 as amended.

(Apr. 25, 1947, ch. 41, §5, 61 Stat. 54.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Act of August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535), entitled "An Act to establish a National Park Service, and for other purposes", referred to in text, is act Aug. 25, 1916, ch. 408, 39 Stat. 535, known as the National Park Service Organic Act, which enacted sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 of this title and provisions set out as a note under section 100101 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs. Sections 1 to 4 of the Act were repealed and restated as section 1865(a) of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and section 100101(a), chapter 1003, and sections 100751(a), 100752, 100753, and 102101 of Title 54 by Pub. L. 113–287, §§3, 4(a)(1), 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3094, 3260, 3272. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables. For disposition of former sections of this title, see Disposition Table preceding section 100101 of Title 54.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

1 See References in Text note below.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NOS. 2-08-182-CR

 2-08-183-CR

 2-08-184-CR

 2-08-185-CR

 2-08-186-CR

 2-08-187-CR

 2-08-188-CR

 2-08-189-CR

 2-08-190-CR

 2-08-191-CR

 2-08-192-CR

 2-08-193-CR

 2-08-194-CR

 2-08-195-CR

 2-08-196-CR

 2-08-197-CR

 2-08-198-CR

 2-08-199-CR

 2-08-200-CR

PHYLLIS DAWN HARVEY APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
1... See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2... The nineteen life sentences are to run concurrently with each other

but consecutively to the conviction for which appellant was on parole when she

committed the offenses.

2

------------

FROM THE 213TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

Appellant Phyllis Dawn Harvey waived a jury and entered open pleas of

guilt to nineteen charges of robbery, eighteen of which were aggravated and all

of which were enhanced with habitual counts. She appeals her convictions and

life sentences on each charge.2 We affirm.

Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to

withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion. In the brief, counsel

avers that, in her professional opinion, the appeals are frivolous. Counsel’s

brief and motion meet the requirements of Anders v. California by presenting

a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable

grounds for relief. 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Appellant filed a pro

se brief, alleging that she received ineffective assistance of counsel and that the
3... The trial court first consolidated ten of the cases and heard evidence

on punishment in one hearing. The trial court later consolidated the remaining

nine cases for purposes of punishment. Neither the State nor appellant

presented any evidence at the second hearing; instead, the State asked the trial

court to take judicial notice of the evidence admitted during the first hearing.

3

life sentences are grossly disproportionate to the offenses. The State declined

to file a brief.

Once an appellant’s court-appointed attorney files a motion to withdraw

on the ground that the appeals are frivolous and fulfills the requirements of

Anders, this court is obligated to undertake an independent examination of the

record in each case. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1991); Mays v. State, 904 S.W.2d 920, 922–23 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth

1995, no pet.). Only then may we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. See

Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).

We have carefully reviewed the records in each case,3counsel’s brief,

and appellant’s pro se brief. We agree with counsel that these appeals are

wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in the record that might

arguably support the appeals. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28

(Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 684, 685 n.6

(Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw
4

and affirm the trial court’s judgments.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: September 17, 2009
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 20 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the Protecting Life in Global Health 

Assistance policy should be permanently established. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 17, 2019 

Mr. LEE (for himself, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. WICKER, 

Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. ROUNDS, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. 

BLUNT, Ms. ERNST, Mr. DAINES, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. HAWLEY, Mr. 

MCCONNELL, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. SASSE, Mr. COTTON, Mr. RISCH, Mr. 

THUNE, Mr. BARRASSO, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. CRAPO, 

Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina, Mr. MORAN, Mr. LANKFORD, Mrs. FISCHER, and Mr. ENZI) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the Protecting Life 

in Global Health Assistance policy should be permanently 

established. 

Whereas section 104(f) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 

1961 (22 U.S.C. 2151b(f)) (commonly referred to as the 

‘‘Helms amendment’’) states that no foreign assistance 

funds may be used to pay for the performance of abortion as a method of family planning or to motivate or coerce any person to practice abortions; 

Whereas section 518 of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2006 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 20 IS 

(Public Law 109–102; 119 Stat. 2202) (commonly referred to as the ‘‘Siljander Amendment’’) states that no 

foreign assistance funds may be used to lobby for or 

against abortion; 

Whereas, in 1984, President Ronald Reagan established the 

‘‘Mexico City Policy,’’ which prohibits foreign aid for 

family planning purposes from being given to foreign 

nongovernmental organizations that perform abortions or 

actively promote abortion as a method of family planning, 

regardless of the source of funding; 

Whereas, upon assuming office on January 20, 1989, President George H.W. Bush continued to enforce the Mexico 

City Policy as established by President Reagan; 

Whereas the Mexico City Policy was reestablished on January 

22, 2001, by President George W. Bush; 

Whereas, on January 23, 2009, President Barack Obama rescinded the Mexico City Policy; 

Whereas, on January 23, 2017, President Donald J. Trump 

reestablished the Mexico City Policy and directed the 

Secretary of State to apply the policy to all Federal global health assistance; and 

Whereas the Department of State modernized the Mexico 

City Policy on May 15, 2017, renamed ‘‘Protecting Life 

in Global Health Assistance,’’ to cover all health assistance provided abroad by a Federal agency, including the 

United States Agency for International Development, the 

Department of State, and the Department of Defense: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that Con2 gress should expeditiously consider statutory changes that 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 20 IS 

1 permanently codify the Protecting Life in Global Health 

2 Assistance policy. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, STATEMENT OF INCOME, AND STATEMENT OF CASHFLOW AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995<F1>
<CASH>                                         116,434
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  264,512
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,998
<INVENTORY>                                    278,665
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               682,038
<PP&E>                                         993,308
<DEPRECIATION>                                 407,405
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,179,932
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          282,293
<BONDS>                                        331,228
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        72,109
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,344,074
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,179,932
<SALES>                                      1,291,552
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,318,649
<CGS>                                          897,309
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,092,560
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,681
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   648
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,538
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                200,222
<INCOME-TAX>                                    68,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            132,222
<DISCONTINUED>                                 163,351
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   295,573
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.48
<FN>
<F1>RESTATED BALANCE AT 12/31/1995.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 10, 2019 

 No. 04-18-00764-CR, 04-18-00765-CR, 04-18-00774-CR, 04-18-00775-CR, 04-18-00777-CR,

04-18-00778-CR, 04-18-00779-CR, 04-18-00780-CR, 04-18-00781-CR, 04-18-00782-CR,

04-18-00783-CR, 04-18-00784-CR, 04-18-00785-CR, 04-18-00786-CR, 04-18-00787-CR,

04-18-00788-CR, 04-18-00789-CR, 04-18-00790-CR, 04-18-00791-CR, 04-18-00792-CR,

04-18-00794-CR, & 04-18-00795-CR

The STATE of Texas,

Appellant 

v. 

Mark Anthony GONZALEZ, Agustin Perez, Jr., Gabriel Rene Perez, Jeremias Aguilar, Jr., 

Martin M. Rios, Jr., Steven Negrete, Fernando Jefte Mata, Eloy Canales Romo, Francisco 

Antonio Rodriguez, Raymond Ryan Robinson, Winston Robert Modisette, Courtney Marie 

Seilhammer, and Ahmed Mamuth 

Appellees

From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 10041CR, 10056CR, 10122CR, 10134CR, 9711CR, 9712CR, 9892CR, 

10123CR, 10054CR, 10138CR, 10187CR, 9964CR, 10185CR, 10047CR, 10074CR, 

10115CR, 10116CR, 10117CR, 10118CR, 10125CR, 10195CR, 10196CR 

Honorable Spencer W. Brown, Judge Presiding 

O RDE R

The Real Party in Interest, Kinney County’s Motion to Extend Time to File Reply Brief 

is GRANTED. 

It is so ORDERED on April 10, 2019. 

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _________________________ 

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
§ 39.160 Communications. ( a ) The agency shall take appropriate steps to ensure effective communication with applicants, participants, personnel of other Federal entities, and members of the public. ( 1 ) The agency shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids where necessary to afford a handicapped person an equal opportunity to participate in, and enjoy the benefits of, a program or activity conducted by the agency. ( i ) In determining what type of auxiliary aid is necessary, the agency shall give primary consideration to the requests of the handicapped person.
( ii ) The agency need not provide individually prescribed devices, readers for personal use or study, or other devices of a personal nature.
( 2 ) Where the agency communicates with applicants and beneficiaries by telephone, telecommunication devices for deaf persons (TDD's) or equally effective telecommunication systems shall be used.
( b ) The agency shall ensure that interested persons, including persons with impaired vision or hearing, can obtain information as to the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities.
( c ) The agency shall provide signage at a primary entrance to each of its inaccessible facilities, directing users to a location at which they can obtain information about accessible facilities. The international symbol for accessibility shall be used at each primary entrance of an accessible facility.
( d ) This section does not require the agency to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a program or activity or in undue financial and administrative burdens. In those circumstances where agency personnel believe that the proposed action would fundamentally alter the program or activity or would result in undue financial and administrative burdens, the agency has the burden of proving that compliance with § 39.160 would result in such alteration or burdens. The decision that compliance would result in such alteration or burdens must be made by the Attorney General or his or her designee after considering all agency resources available for use in the funding and operation of the conducted program or activity, and must be accompanied by a written statement of the reasons for reaching that conclusion. If an action required to comply with this section would result in such an alteration or such burdens, the agency shall take any other action that would not result in such an alteration or such burdens but would nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, handicapped persons receive the benefits and services of the program or activity.