alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
County of Kent:

Before me, a Notary Public, for the County and State aforesaid. Edward Dulin, known

to me to be such, who being sworn according to law deposed and says that he is

President of lndependent Newsmedia lnc. USA, the publisher of the Delaware State

News, a daily newspaper published at Dover, County of Kent, and State of Delaware,

and that the notice, a copy of which is hereto attached, as published in the Delaware

State News in its issue of 05125114.

President

lndependent Newsmedia lnc. USA

Sworn to and subscribed before me this 25th Day of May,4.D., 2014
y, will conduct a public hearing on a proposed

state implementation plan (SIP) revision,entitled "Delaware 2011 Base Year State Implementation Plan (SIP) Emission Inventoryûnder the 2008 Ozóne National Ambient Air

Quality Standard (NMQS)'1

According to Section 182(aX1) of CAA and

EPA's imólementation rule for the 2008 ozone

standard (Proposed Rule, June 6, 2013, 78 FR34178), Delaware is required to submit to EPA in Julú 2014 a SIP revision which compilesDelawãre 2011 em¡ssions of volatile organic

compounds (VOC), oxides of nitrogen (NOx),and carbon monoxide (CO) from five sourcesectors: stationary point sources, stationarynon-point sources, on-road mobile sources

and hon-road mobile sources. The subjectemrssron lnventory State lmplementatlon PlanISIP) revision under the B-hour ozone Nationàt RrîO¡ent Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) set

torth by US-Environmental Protection Agency

document conta¡ns Delaware's baseemission inventory State Jmplementation

(EPA) in 2008,

Register of and can be viewed

after

The public hearing will be held Thursday, June

26,20L4, beginning at 6:00 p.m. in the DN- REC Auditorium, 89 Kinqs Highway, Dover,

DE 19901. The subiect document and the

supporting materials ãre available for public

review from May 20 through July 6,2014, at the DNREC Offices at 715 Grantham Lane,New Caste, DE L9720, and, 655 S. Bay Road,Dover, DE 19901. The document will be published in the June 1, 2014 issue of Delaware

For additional information, please contact David Fees, in the Dover Office, at (302) 739-

9402, email David,Fees(ôstate.de.us. Interested parties may submit comments in wr¡t¡ng

on the proposed SIP revision prior on to the pub- the proposed SIP revision prior to the public hearing. Comments may be presented presenteiJ ei- ' ther orally or in writing writing at the public hearing. hear¡ng.If you you areé unable toattend the public hearing

or wish to submit vour comments in advance

of the public heaiing, please address yourcomments to:

Division of Air Quality Subject: 2011 SIP Inventory

655 South 8ay Road

Suite 5N

Dover, DE 19901

10882 DSN 5l2s/2014
§ 71.26 Form, filing and service of papers. ( a ) *Form.* Documents filed with the ALJ shall include an original and two copies. Every pleading and paper filed in the proceeding shall contain a caption setting forth the title of the action, the case number assigned by the ALJ, and a designation of the paper (e.g., motion to quash subpoena). Every pleading and paper shall be signed by, and shall contain the address and telephone number of the party or the person on whose behalf the paper was filed, or his or her representative.
( b ) *Filing.* Papers are considered filed when they are mailed. Date of mailing may be established by a certificate from the party or its representative or by proof that the document was sent by certified or registered mail.
( c ) *Service.* A party filing a document with the ALJ shall, at the time of filing, serve a copy of such document on every other party. Service upon any party of any document other than those required to be served as prescribed in § 71.8 shall be made by delivering a copy or by placing a copy of the document in the United States mail, postage prepaid and addressed, to the party's last known address. When a party is represented by a representative, service shall be made upon such representative in lieu of the actual party.
( d ) *Proof of service.* A certificate of the individual serving the document by personal delivery or by mail, setting forth the manner of service, shall be proof of service.
#### § 71.15 *Ex parte* contacts.

No party or person (except employees of the ALJ's office) shall communicate in any way with the ALJ on any matter at issue in a case, unless on notice and opportunity for all parties to participate. This provision does not prohibit a person or party from inquiring about the status of a case or asking routine questions concerning administrative functions or procedures.
#### § 41.2 Application.

This part applies to each Federal department and agency that is empowered to extend Federal financial assistance.
### §410cc–37. Use of funds; maintenance of financial records; audits

(a) Any revenues or other assets acquired by the Commission by donation, the lease or sale of property or fees for services shall be available to the Commission, without fiscal year limitation, to be used for any function of the Commission authorized under this subchapter. The Commission shall keep financial records fully disclosing the amount and source of revenues and other assets acquired by the Commission, and shall keep such other financial records as the Secretary may prescribe.

(b) The Secretary shall require audits of the financial records of the Commission to be conducted not less frequently than once each year in order to ensure that revenues and other assets of the Commission are being used in a manner authorized under this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 95–290, title III, §307, as added Pub. L. 96–344, §10, Sept. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 1136.)
#### § 389.101 OMB control numbers assigned pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act.

This part concerns Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control numbers assigned to information collection requirements. Current OMB control numbers are available at *https://www.ferc.gov*. For the most current information, interested persons should consult the Commission's website under “Enforcement Legal” and then “Legal” and then “Information Collections” or directly at *https://www.ferc.gov/enforcement-legal/legal/information-collections*.

[Order 878, 86 FR 54611, Oct. 4, 2021]
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 39 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 39

 Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed export to the 
 United Arab Emirates and United Kingdom of certain defense articles, 
             including technical data and defense services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2019

Mr. Menendez (for himself, Mr. Graham, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Paul, Mr. Leahy, 
  Mr. Young, and Mr. Reed) introduced the following joint resolution; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed export to the 
 United Arab Emirates and United Kingdom of certain defense articles, 
             including technical data and defense services.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the issuance of an export 
license with respect to the following proposed export to the United 
Arab Emirates and United Kingdom is prohibited:
            (1) The transfer to the United Arab Emirates and United 
        Kingdom of the following export of certain defense articles, 
        including technical data and defense services, described in 
        Executive Communication 1426 (EC-1426) submitted to Congress 
        pursuant to section 36(c) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 
        U.S.C. 2776(c)) and published in the Congressional Record on 
        June 3, 2019: The proposal to amend a technical assistance 
        agreement to support the installation, integration, 
        modification, maintenance, and repair of F110-GE-132 gas 
        turbine engines for use in F-16 Aircraft by the General 
        Headquarters of the Armed Forces of the United Arab Emirates.
                                 <all>
```
### Court ofAppeals FOR THE 

### Third District ofTexas p.o.box 12547,austin,texas 78711-2547 

### (512)463-1733

Date: 

### October 1,2015 Case Number: 03-15-00602-CV Trial Court No.: C-l-CR-13-217089 

### Style: 

### In re Rodney Kidd 

# /RECEIVED^ OCT t 4 2015 -.THIRDCOURTOFAPPEALS.



## The enclosed opinionwas sent this date to the following persons:

The Honorable Dana DeBeauvoir 

## Criminal County Clerk Travis County Courthouse P.O.Box 149325 

### Austin, TX 78714 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * The Honorable Carlos Humberto Barrera 

### Judge. County Courtat LawNo. 8 P.O.Box 1748 Austin. TX 78767 

### The Honorable Billy Ray Stubblefield Administrative Judge WilliamsonCounty Courthouse 

## 405 Martin LutherKing, Box 2 Georgetown, TX 78626 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * 

### Mr. Rodney Kidd ID #1531033 TCCCC 3614 Bill Price Road 

### DeIValle,TX 78617 The Honorable David A. Escamilla 

### County Attorney Travis County P.O. Box 1748 

### Austin, TX 78767-1748 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

## TEXAS COURTOFAPPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, ATAUSTIN
NO. 03-15-00602-CV



### In re Rodney Kidd
ORIGINALPROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION 

## The petition for writ of mandamus and prohibition is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).


## Cindy OlsonBourland, Justice 

## Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Bourland Filed: October 1,2015M

m Q! ID.., •Slv, (LV OV 

### 10 -Jri

ui It -i 

# § 

# J

CO n
"2" c: _:: -•: =: h2: >"

:r:l" j: * I'" J:

--. <;>

r: '"' Is '""

•-•«' =: V. i-- zJ ss o? ,C C7 *~ 

## £, 5? # hi q, cr 

# ^3" "7£ Oi£ 

# ^£## -° O £ fit 

### D w H B S i— . O -?fc -

o 2 w m
D O 

# 3 re o 

### q o

o -n 

## >
t-rt >

T) "D 73 m H 00 o 3] o > r- rn u CD C GO 

# 8 PRESORTED FIRST CLASS
Exhibit 10 (xiv)(a)

Supplemental Executive Long-Term Disability Benefit Plan  of Great Lakes Chemical Corporation

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Great Lakes Chemical Corporation (the "Company") has previously approved the establishment of the Great Lakes Chemical
Corporation Funded Benefit Plan (the "Funded Plan") that provides long-term disability benefits (LTD benefits of the Funded Plan) for eligible employees of the Company, including the
senior executives of the Company; and

WHEREAS,
the Funded Plan is funded through a voluntary employees' beneficiary association (VEBA) that operates in accordance with applicable federal law and which must comply with the
recent changes in the law that limit the compensation that may be considered under such Funded Plan to $150,000; and

WHEREAS,
the Funded Plan LTD benefits are determined as a percentage of basic monthly earnings and that the application of the $150,000 annual compensation limit prohibits the
senior executives of the Company from receiving the full LTD benefits originally intended; and

WHEREAS,
the Board of Directors has approved the establishment of a Supplemental Executive Long-Term Disability Benefit Plan (the "Plan") that will restore for named senior
executives of the Company most of the LTD benefits that are lost as a result of the compensation limit. Such Supplemental Executive Long-Term Disability Benefit Plan of Great Lakes
Chemical Corporation shall be effective January 1, 1995 and is set forth below.

I.Eligibility



II.Benefits



III.Amendment and Administration



---



IV.Miscellaneous



---



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this Plan this 10th day of October, 1994 to be effective January 1, 1995.

|                 |  | GREAT LAKES CHEMICAL CORPORATION
|---------------- |  | --------------------------------
|                 |  | By:                             
|                 |  |                                 
|Attest:          |  |                                 
|/s/STEVE D. MEAD |  |                                 

---

QuickLinks
### §3710. Limitation on authority

Nothing in this chapter authorizes the Foundation to perform any function the exclusive authority for which is provided to the National Park Foundation by subchapter II of chapter 1011 of title 54.

(Pub. L. 98–244, §11, as added Pub. L. 106–408, title II, §208, Nov. 1, 2000, 114 Stat. 1781; amended Pub. L. 113–287, §5(d)(35), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3267; Pub. L. 116–188, title I, §107(d), Oct. 30, 2020, 134 Stat. 920.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2020—Pub. L. 116–188 inserted "exclusive" before "authority".

2014—Pub. L. 113–287 substituted "subchapter II of chapter 1011 of title 54" for "Public Law 90–209 (16 U.S.C. 19e et seq.)".
#### § 541.24 Disciplinary segregation status.

You may be placed in disciplinary segregation status only by the DHO as a disciplinary sanction.
Exhibit 10AA
                             AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT



         THIS  AMENDMENT  TO  AGREEMENT  is entered  into this ___day of _______
____, by and between Guilford Mills, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Guilford" or
the "Company"), and _________________ (the "Associate").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:
                              -------------------
         WHEREAS, the Associate and the Company entered into an agreement, dated
_____________ , as the same may have been amended, pursuant to which the Company
has  agreed  to pay the  Associate  termination  compensation  in the  event the
Associate  should  leave the  employ  of the  Company  under  the  circumstances
described  in,  and  otherwise  subject  to the terms and  conditions  of,  such
agreement (the "Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS,  the  Associate  and the  Company  have  agreed  to amend  the
Agreement on the terms set forth below.

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions
contained  herein and other good and  valuable  consideration,  the  receipt and
sufficiency  of which are  hereby  acknowledged,  the  parties  hereby  agree as
follows:

         1. Section 1(c) of the Agreement is hereby  deleted in its entirety and
the following provision is substituted in its place:

                           The  Company   shall  be  obligated  to  provide  the
                           payments and benefits referred to in Sections 3 and 4
                           hereof  following,  and the  provisions  of Section 2
                           hereof  shall  apply to, a Change in  Control  of the
                           Company  only if such  Change in  Control  shall have
                           occurred  within,  or as a result of efforts for such
                           purposes   known  to  the  parties   hereto  to  have
                           commenced  prior to, February 29, 2000 (or such later
                           date as the Board shall determine).

         2.  Except  as  otherwise  set  forth  above,  the  Agreement   remains
unmodified and in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on
the date first above written.

                                                  GUILFORD MILLS, INC.

                                                 By: _________________________
                                                 Its:_________________________


                                                  ____________________________
                                                  [Name of Associate]
p

g 

y 

y 

g 

pp

easier to have the appendixes directly after the Policy Statements then when you read the Policy Statement

the explanations etc.. would follow and confirm and clarify what had been read.

Thank you

Ami C. Mime-Allen, SRA

Mime-Allen Appraisal Company

P.O. Box 179East Burke, VT 05832

802-274-0202 (Business Cell)866-284-0829 (Fax)
S. J. Res. 54 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen 

Joint Resolution 

Relating to a national emergency declared by the President on February 15, 2019. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That, pursuant 

to section 202 of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622), 

the national emergency declared by the finding of the President 

on February 15, 2019, in Proclamation 9844 (84 Fed. Reg. 4949) 

is hereby terminated. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|                                     |                                                                                                                     |                              |
|------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                                     |                                                                                                                     |
|                                |                                                                                                                |                         |
| Date: April                14, 2008 | By:                                                                                                            | /s/                Douglas Kanter |
|                                     | Douglas                Kanter                                                                                            |
|                                     |  Chief                Executive Officer, President,                and Acting ChiefFinancial                Officer |

----
#### B. H. Krueger, Inc., Appellant, v. Bernhard H. Krueger, Respondent, and Ruth Flaster et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.; Glennon and Cohn, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm.
EXHIBIT 99.1
                       CEO CERTIFICATION AS OF 12/31/2002



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of John H. Harland Company (the "Company")for the
period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the Chairman of
the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies that:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Timothy C. Tuff                              3/25/2003
________________________                         _________________________
Timothy C. Tuff                                  Date
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7732

GILBERT BLACKWELL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

EARL BESHEARS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-98-

1492-AMD)

Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 25, 1999

Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gilbert Blackwell, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See Blackwell v. Beshears, No. CA-98-1492-AMD

(D. Md. Oct. 22, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal 

revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound 

volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical 

error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of 

Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 

Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557-

1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us

SJC-12526

RICHARD MICHAEL BARBOSA vs. COMMONWEALTH.

February 25, 2019.

Supreme Judicial Court, Superintendence of inferior courts.

Practice, Criminal, Record.

The petitioner, Richard Michael Barbosa, appeals from a 

judgment of a single justice of this court dismissing, without a 

hearing, his petition pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3. The papers 

that Barbosa has filed are, at best, difficult to discern. He 

appears to be complaining about certain actions, or inactions, 

of both the trial court judge and standby counsel in various 

criminal proceedings in the Superior Court. Neither the 

specifics about which he complains nor what relief he seeks are 

clear. His submissions, in short, do not rise to the level of 

adequate appellate argument and they fail to establish any 

coherent basis for relief. Mass. R. A. P. 16 (a) (4), as 

amended, 367 Mass. 921 (1975). Moreover, Barbosa had, but 

failed to meet, the burden "to provide a record sufficient to 

evaluate his claims." Sabree v. Commonwealth, 479 Mass. 1006, 

1007 (2018), citing Gorod v. Tabachnick, 428 Mass. 1001 (1998).1

 

1 It appears that some of the matters that the petitioner 

raises may pertain to his currently pending direct appeal. If 

that is so, he is free to raise those matters in that appeal if 

relevant. To the extent that he raises matters pertaining to 

earlier convictions (that are not a part of the pending direct 

appeal), such as complaints about ineffective assistance of 

counsel, those matters appear to be ones that should be raised 

in the first instance in the trial court via a motion for a new 

trial.
2

Judgment affirmed.

Richard Michael Barbosa, pro se.

Houston Armstrong, Assistant District Attorney, for the 

Commonwealth.
CS254717K

Who

needs

a vaccine?

Even healthy people can get the flu, and it can be serious. 

 Everyone 6 months and older should get a flu vaccine. This means you.

 This season, protect yourself—and those around you—by getting a flu vaccine.

For more information, visit: http://www.cdc.gov/flu