alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 552.13 Medical x-ray device, major instrument, or surgical intrusion. ( a ) The institution physician may authorize use of a major instrument (including anoscope or vaginal speculum) or surgical intrusion for medical reasons only, with the inmate's consent.
( b ) The institution physician may authorize use of a medical x-ray device for medical reasons and only with the consent of the inmate. When there exists no reasonable alternative, and an examination using a medical x-ray device is determined necessary for the security, good order, or discipline of the institution, the Warden, upon approval of the Regional Director, may authorize the institution physician to order a non-repetitive examination using a medical x-ray device for the purpose of determining if contraband is concealed in or on the inmate (for example: In a cast or body cavity). The examination using a medical x-ray device may not be performed if it is determined by the institution physician that it is likely to result in serious or lasting medical injury or harm to the inmate. Staff shall place documentation of the examination and the reasons for the examination in the inmate's central file and medical file. ( 1 ) The Warden and Regional Director or persons officially acting in that capacity may not redelegate the authority to approve an examination using medical x-ray device for the purpose of determining if contraband is present. An Acting Warden or Acting Regional Director may, however, perform this function.
( 2 ) Staff shall solicit the inmate's consent prior to an examination using a medical x-ray device. However, the inmate's consent is not required.
( c ) The Warden may direct searches of inanimate objects using a medical x-ray device where the inmate is not exposed.
[80 FR 32002, June 5, 2015]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5

<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                         JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                           MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                      0
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            0
<PP&E>                                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   8,245
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                1,019
<OTHER-SE>                                             (9,264)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                0
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            0
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        8,150
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (8,150)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (8,150)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.01)



</TABLE>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED DAWA YNE LEE DAVIS , JR. ,

Petitioner ,
v. Cas e No. 5D22 -1910 LT Case No. 2017- CF

- 000464 -A

S TATE OF FLORIDA ,

Respondent

. ________________________________/ Opinion filed September 16, 2022 Petition for Belated Appeal A Case of Original Jurisdiction. Dawayne Lee Davis, Jr. , Jasper , pro s e

. Ashley Moody , Attorney General Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock McGuigan , Assistan t Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent PER CURIAM. The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall
be filed with the trial cour t and be treated a s the notice of appeal from the May 5 , 2020 order ( and July 22, 2020 rehe aring order) denying the motion2

for pos t conviction relief filed in C ase 2017

- CF

- 000464

- A , Sumter County,
Florida. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)( 6 )(D).

PETITION G RANTED

.

W ALLIS , E IS NAUGLE and HARRIS , JJ., concu r.
Figure 3.8-1 – U.S. Steel-GCW Receptor Network
Figure 3.8-2 – U.S. Steel-GCW Maximum Receptor Concentration Values
Figure 3.8-3 – U.S. Steel-GCW Plant Boundary and Peak Impact Receptor
§ 725.3 Applicability. These regulations apply to all Council actions which have the potential to affect floodplains or wetlands or which would be subject to potential harm if they were located in floodplains or wetlands. The basic test of the potential of an action to affect floodplains or wetlands is the action's potential to result in the long- or short-term adverse impacts associated with: ( a ) The occupancy or modification of floodplains, or the direct and indirect support of floodplain development; or
( b ) The destruction or modification of wetlands or the direct or indirect support of new construction in wetlands.
These procedures apply to Level A and B regional or river basin planning activities carried out by regional planning sponsors including consideration of inclusion of site specific projects in Level A or B regional or river basin plans. These procedures do not apply to site specific Level C planning carried out by individual Federal agencies. Each Federal agency shall use its own procedures promulgated pursuant to these Orders for such Level C planning.
#### In the Matter of Walter H. Cragg, an Attorney.

Matter referred to the Hon. JosiahT. Marean, official referee, to take proof and report to the court, with his recommendation. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Putnam, JJ.
Exhibit 10.20

                         SECOND AMENDMENT
                              TO THE
              HANNAFORD SAVINGS AND INVESTMENT PLAN

     The Hannaford  Savings and  Investment  Plan,  formerly named the Hannaford
Northeast  Savings and Investment Plan, was last amended and restated  effective
generally  January 1, 1998.  A Proposed  First  Amendment  was  submitted to the
Internal  Revenue  Service on  September  15, 1999.  The Plan is hereby  further
amended in the following respects:

     1. The terms used in this  Amendment  shall have the  meanings set forth in
the Plan unless the context indicates otherwise.

     2.   Section 3.1 is amended to read as follows:

          "3.1  DATE OF PARTICIPATION.  Except as hereinafter provided,
     each Employee who is in the employ of an Employer on the Effective
     Date and who meets the requirements of Section 3.2 on or before
     November 30, 1997, shall be eligible to participate in the Plan as of
     the Effective Date.  Each other Employee who thereafter meets the
     requirements of Section 3.2 shall be eligible to participate in the
     Plan as of the first day of the second month following the month in
     which he or she meets such requirements, provided he or she is still
     in the employ of an Employer on such date.  Notwithstanding the
     foregoing provisions to the contrary, each Employee who was a
     participant in the Hannaford Southeast Savings and Investment Plan as
     of December 31, 1997, shall be eligible to participate in the Plan as
     of the Effective Date, provided he or she is still in the employ of an
     Employer on the Effective Date.  Effective January 1, 2000, each
     Employee who was previously employed by Pic-n-Pay, Inc., shall be
     eligible to participate in the Plan as of the later of the closing
     date of the acquisition by the Company of Pic-n-Pay, Inc., or the
     first day of the second month following the month in which he or she
     meets the requirements of Section 3.2.  For purposes of determining
     whether such Employee has completed a Year of Participation Service,
     his or her service with Pic-n-Pay shall be taken into account."

     3.   Section 7.2 is hereby deleted.

     4.   This Amendment shall be effective January 1, 2000.
# IA_SEC_-_FIRM_DOWNLOAD_-_125352
### SUBCHAPTER III–A—NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM VISITOR FACILITY
#### In the Matter of New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Appellant. Kirk Reid et al., Respondents, et al., Respondents.

[825 NYS2d 448]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Yvonne Gonzalez, J.), entered July 6, 2005, which denied the petition to stay arbitration of respondents’ uninsured motorist claim, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

There was no genuine triable issue of fact justifying a stay. Neither the police report nor respondents identify the offending vehicle. Moreover, the insurance activity expansion report provided by petitioner failed to establish a preliminary issue that would justify a stay *(cf. Matter of AIU Ins. Co. v Cabreja,*301 AD2d 448 [2003]). Concur—Friedman, J.P., Williams, Gonzalez, Sweeny and McGuire, JJ.
### §1251. Definitions

As used in this chapter:

(1) The term "high potential historic sites" means those historic sites related to the route, or sites in close proximity thereto, which provide opportunity to interpret the historic significance of the trail during the period of its major use. Criteria for consideration as high potential sites include historic significance, presence of visible historic remnants, scenic quality, and relative freedom from intrusion.

(2) The term "high potential route segments" means those segments of a trail which would afford high quality recreation experience in a portion of the route having greater than average scenic values or affording an opportunity to vicariously share the experience of the original users of a historic route.

(3) The term "State" means each of the several States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, the Northern Mariana Islands, and any other territory or possession of the United States.

(4) The term "without expense to the United States" means that no funds may be expended by Federal agencies for the development of trail related facilities or for the acquisition of lands or interests in lands outside the exterior boundaries of Federal areas. For the purposes of the preceding sentence, amounts made available to any State or political subdivision under chapter 2003 of title 54 or any other provision of law shall not be treated as an expense to the United States.

(Pub. L. 90–543, §12, as added Pub. L. 98–11, title II, §210, Mar. 28, 1983, 97 Stat. 50; amended Pub. L. 113–287, §5(d)(28), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3267.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Par. (4). Pub. L. 113–287 substituted "chapter 2003 of title 54" for "the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965".

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Termination of Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands

For termination of Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, see note set out preceding section 1681 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-02-00799-CR NO. 03-02-00800-CR

Oscar Gomez, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NOS. 006134 & 3012707, HONORABLE FRED A. MOORE, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Oscar Gomez appeals from two orders revoking community supervision. In district

court cause number 006134, the conviction is for possession of cocaine and the sentence imposed

is two years’ imprisonment. In cause number 3012707, the conviction is for robbery and the

sentence is five years’ imprisonment.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a b rief concluding that the appeals are

frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of A nders v. California

, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the records demo nstrating why there are no

arguable grounds to be advanced. S ee also Penson v. Ohio

, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State

, 573

S. W .2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State

, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);

Jackson v. State

, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State

, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.2

Crim. App. 1969). A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant, who was advised of his

right to examine the appellate records and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

We have reviewed the records and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeals are

frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the records that might arguably support the appeals.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

The orders revoking community supervision are affirmed.

__________________________________________ David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Kidd, Patterson and Puryear

Affirmed

Filed: October 2, 2003

Do Not Publish
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law

of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 3/25/96 TENTH CIRCUIT STANLEY CHARLES TOPPING, Plaintiff - Appellant, No. 95-1359 v. (D.C. No. 95-S-597) DON LAWSON and NORA KURTZ, Security Sgt., (D. Colo.) Defendants - Appellees.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before PORFILIO, McKAY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. After examining Appellant’s brief and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This is a pro se appeal from a § 1915(d) dismissal of a § 1983 action claiming cruel and unusual punishment. From the Plaintiff’s own pleadings it is clear that this case2

falls comfortably in that class of disputes over the course of medical treatment and does not remotely allege facts supporting a cruel and unusual punishment claim. Olson v. Stotts , 9 F.3d 1475, 1477 (10th Cir. 1993). The motions for leave to appeal informa pauperis and the production of records are denied. The appeal is dismissed as legally frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d).

DISMISSED. The mandate shall issue forthwith. Entered for the Court Monroe G. McKay Circuit Judge
确保它遮住您的鼻子和嘴,以帮助保护他人。

您可能已被感染但没有症状。

实行社交疏离

与他人保持�英尺(�臂长)的距离。

并戴上布面罩

CS 317297-D 05/29/2020

保护自己和他人免受COVID-19的侵害
================================================================================


                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Amexdrug Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Jack Amin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  the operation of the Company.


/s/Jack Amin
-----------------------------
Jack Amin
Chief Financial Officer
April 17, 2006

























--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
§ 33.100 Definitions. The Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) will use the following definitions in providing guidance to your jurisdiction regarding the purchase of armor vests under the Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant Act of 1998— ( a ) The term *program* will refer to the activities administered by BJA to implement the Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant Act of 1998;
( b ) The terms *you* and *your* will refer to a jurisdiction applying to this program;
( c ) The term *armor vest* under this program will mean a vest that has met the performance standards established by the National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center of the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) as published in NIJ Standard 0101.03, or any formal revision of this standard;
( d ) The term *State* will be used to mean each of the 50 States, as well as the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands;
( e ) The term *unit of local government* will mean a county, municipality, town, township, village, parish, borough, or other unit of general government below the State level;
( f ) The term *Indian tribe* has the same meaning as in section 4(e) of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450b(e)) which defines Indian tribe as meaning any Indian tribe, band, nation, or other organized group or community, including any Alaska Native village or regional or village corporation as defined in or established pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (85 Stat. 688) (43 U.S.C. 1601 *et seq.*);
( g ) The term *law enforcement officer* will mean any officer, agent, or employee of a State, unit of local government, or Indian tribe authorized by law or by a government agency to engage in or supervise the prevention, detection, or investigation of any violation of criminal law, or authorized by law to supervise sentenced criminal offenders; and
( h ) The term *mandatory wear policy* will mean a policy formally adopted by a jurisdiction that requires a law enforcement officer to wear an armor vest throughout each duty shift whenever feasible.
### §410cc–21. Park management plan

#### (a) Submission date and contents of preparatory statement to Congress

The Secretary shall submit a statement to the Congress, within two years after the date on which funds are made available to carry out this subchapter, which—

(1) reports on the progress that the Secretary has made in acquiring the properties identified under section 410cc–22 of this title, and describes the way the Secretary intends to use these properties;

(2) identifies the properties within the park and preservation district respecting which the Secretary has entered into or intends to enter into agreements relating to interpretive exhibits or programs under section 410cc–23(a) of this title;

(3)(A) reports on the progress of the Secretary in leasing a portion of the Lowell Manufacturing Company, located on Market Street, for the purpose of establishing a visitors' center in close proximity to parking and other transportation facilities, and (B) identifies any other property within the park which the Secretary has leased or intends to lease for purposes of the park;

(4) reports any other activities which the Secretary has taken or intends to take to carry out the purpose of this subchapter; and

(5) contains a tentative budget for the park and preservation district for the subsequent five fiscal years.

#### (b) Establishment, submission date, contents, etc., of plan

(1) Not later than three years after the date on which funds are made available to carry out this subchapter, the Secretary shall establish and submit to the Congress a park management plan containing the information described in subsection (a) of this section. Such plan shall, upon request, be available to the public.

(2) After consulting with the Commission, the city manager of Lowell, and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the Secretary may make revisions in the park management plan established pursuant to paragraph (1) of this subsection by publication of such revisions in the Federal Register. A revision made under this paragraph shall be effective 90 days after written notice of the revision is submitted to the Congress.

(Pub. L. 95–290, title II, §201, June 5, 1978, 92 Stat. 292.)
The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of 1

Minnesota, presiding. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-3459

___________

Tannise Y. Larkins, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the District of 

* Minnesota.

Target Stores, Inc., *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: November 19, 1998

Filed: December 7, 1998

___________

Before BEAM, MAGILL, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Tannise Y. Larkins appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary

1

judgment. She alleges that her former employer, Target Stores, Inc., discriminated

against her on the basis of race, in violation of Title VII, and on the basis of disability,

in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Having carefully reviewed the
-2-

record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that no error of law appears and accordingly

affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Forestsof Connecticut.**
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.163/7:
Item Number:0084-N-07 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000965603
 
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019
 
May 15, 2018