alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
Case No. 6D2 3

- 1035 Lower Tribunal No. CF17

- 004714

- XX

_____________________________
J ERRY P AUL S ALTER , Appellant
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County

. Melissa Gravitt , Judge.

April 23, 2024

PER CURIAM

.

AFFIRMED

.
WOZNIAK and MIZE, JJ., and LAMBERT, B.D., Associate Judge, c oncur.

Jerry Paul Salter, Bushnell, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Laura Dempsey, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
§ 511.17 When a non-inmate will be denied entry to or required to leave a Bureau facility or Bureau grounds. At the Warden's, or his/her designee's, discretion, and based on this subpart, you may be denied entry to, or required to leave, a Bureau facility or Bureau grounds if: ( a ) You refuse to be searched under this subpart; or
( b ) There is reasonable suspicion that you may be engaged in, attempting, or about to engage in, prohibited activity that jeopardizes the Bureau's ability to ensure the safety, security, and orderly operation of its facilities, or protect the public. “Reasonable suspicion,” for this purpose, may be based on the results of a search conducted under this subpart, or any other reliable information.
§ 76.4 Enforcement procedures. ( a ) *Commencement of proceedings.* If the United States Attorney's office having jurisdiction over the matter determines that a person has violated section 6486 of the Act, the proceeding to assess a civil penalty under section 6486 of the Act shall be commenced by the United States Attorney issuing a Notice of Intent to Assess Civil Penalty. Service of this Notice shall be accomplished pursuant to 28 CFR 76.6.
( b ) *Notice of intent to assess a civil penalty.* The Notice of Intent to Assess Civil Penalty (Notice) will contain a concise statement of factual allegations informing the respondent of the act or conduct alleged to be in violation of law, the statutory and regulatory provisions alleged to have been violated, and the amount of penalty for which the respondent could be liable. The Notice will advise the respondent of the following, in addition to any other specific information determined by the United States Attorney to be necessary: ( 1 ) That the respondent has the right to representation by counsel, but not at government expense;
( 2 ) That any statement given during the course of the proceeding may be used against the person in this or any other proceeding, including any criminal prosecution;
( 3 ) That a respondent may be able to assert a privilege, such as the privilege against self-incrimination;
( 4 ) That failure to file a response to the allegations listed in the Notice within thirty (30) days of the date of service may result in the entry of a non-appealable final order assessing a penalty in an amount to be determined by the Attorney General;
( 5 ) That the respondent has the right to request an adjudicatory proceeding, including a hearing, before a Judge pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 554-557 and this part, and that such request, in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section, must be made within thirty (30) days from the date the notice is served;
( 6 ) That a respondent may waive an adjudicatory proceeding at any time and agree to pay a penalty in an amount to be determined by the Attorney General; and
( 7 ) That in determining the amount of the penalty the respondent's income and net assets must be considered.
( c ) *Answer to notice.* To timely request an adjudicatory proceeding in response to a Notice, a respondent must serve upon the United States Attorney designated in the Notice a written answer responding to each allegation listed in the Notice and request a hearing, in accordance with 28 CFR 76.4(b), within thirty (30) days from the date the Notice was served upon the respondent. If the respondent does not serve an answer within thirty (30) days, the Attorney General or his designee may enter a final order, from which there is no appeal, ordering a payment of a civil penalty.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 61 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 61

Approving the request of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for a waiver 
        under section 1703E(f) of title 38, United States Code.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 12, 2019

  Mr. Moran introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
        twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Approving the request of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for a waiver 
        under section 1703E(f) of title 38, United States Code.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress approves the 
request for a waiver under section 1703E(f) of title 38, United States 
Code, as submitted by the Secretary on December 6, 2019.
                                 <all>
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JULIE ANN HUNSICKER

, Appellant,

v.

LTD PROPERTIES, LLC

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 3968

[ April 23, 2020 ]

Appeal of non

- final order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth

Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Janis Brustares Keyser , Judge; L.T.

Case No. 502018CA014889

.

Julie Ann Hunsicker, Loxahatchee, pro se.

James S. Werter of The Law Office of Paul A. Krasker, P.A., West Palm

Be ach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY

, D AMOORGIAN and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-239

Lower Tribunal No. 20-CF-000085

_____________________________

RICKY GASPAR RUIZ, III,

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County.

J. Frank Porter, Judge.

January 2, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

STARGEL, NARDELLA and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Deana K. Marshall, Special 

Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Krystle Celine Cacci, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. 

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
,I



## U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building ground floor Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE , Washington, DC 20590

RE: Exemption No: 10249 From 14 CFR (FAR Section)- Part: 91.109(b)(3); 91.109(a) FAA Docket number FAA-2011-0168
Dear US DOT
I am hereby requesting an extension for my exemption for training in single style throw-over yoke Beech craft Debonairs, Bonanzas, and Barons.

,. 

## Thank you for your assistance in this matter.**Pl~ase** 

## let me know if you have any questions.**~r** 

## cell phone 801-550-9817. My emiail address wtimmiller@comcast.net.

.,

### S~ncerely, 

## ,

# i 1 '. / fi 

# I •:..;. /

# /~td· /' / 

# ).l!l'i.i •
. ) :///**~"·~~** 

# \_I**~** 

# ,:::.;

. '·

.. • ·walter

# Tim~thy Miller 3218968 

# eFt exp 3/14



# ... ;

Date: 10/16/2012 Exemption No: 10249 from 14 CFR (FAR S ction)- Part: 91.109 (b)(3); 91.109 (a) will expire on 4/30/2013. If appropriate, pie >e submit**'Y'·•·v.: ·u,;r,'~"'·**  

# ,, I I**Ot~; !:~6522091**  your request to extend this exemption (inciL ·'ing the

### ··~'**:...\:-.:¥~•:** docket number FAA-2011-0168) within 30 Jays of the

# ~ff~~tt~;Jlt.~ ..

# ~ ... 

# QQ 0'lQ date of this 11otice. Otherwise,

### th~ FA'\ rna not be able .•

### if~~.'·~·,.·:; 

## . ,,:;

. .....JL.

__ to

### p_ro~ss your request for

### extension.~ 3fore ·:he _,.

### ~ 

# 't-{ ·. , ;..:: ·· ·wi 17 ( 2 012

.. expiration date. You may either subm1 your 3quest 

# ·'-t :**-:..~~~~**

# , . . electronically through the internet usin the 'ocket •.

## ·~; .

## ~·_to.;~. · . r,lo:i!cd rrom 20591 ·t t •• ;. 

### ·T. I'TIIIer 

### 'J,... 

### '"''OSTA"r:: Management System web s1 e a : · 

## tifgfrti F. 11 t' • 

## R& · • · · ·**~.,. ~**  

## · http://Regulations.gov/ or mail your request to: 

### Sandy, ,;Ten me U.S. Department of Trarsportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building ground floor, Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Submission to other locations rnay delay processing. Any request for extension must meet the requirements of 14 CFR part 11. If you have already requested an extension for this exemption or no longer need this exemption, please ignore this notice. 

### 84093



# IL I 

# lul,,\11,,, \, i.,lllllllllll\111 

# n II II

# \u'i,!' ,\111111; i 

# ,I
The Ho norable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for th e 1 Eastern District of Arkansas.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-3532

___________ Earl Croston, Jr., * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. University of Central Arkansas, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: May 29, 1998 Filed: June 8, 1998

___________ Before FAGG, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Earl Croston, Jr., appeals from the district court & s judgment for the University 1 of Central Arkansas entered after a bench trial on Mr. Croston & s claims brought under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2000e-17. After a careful review of the record and the parties & submissions on appeal, we conclude the di strict court committed no error. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Mr. Croston & s pending motions filed with this court.-2-

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
2003 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

2-25-2003

Dluhos v. Strasberg

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket 01-3713

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2003 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Dluhos v. Strasberg" (2003). 2003 Decisions. Paper 769.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003/769
PRECEDENTIAL 

 Filed February 25, 2003 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

No. 01-3713 

ERIC DLUHOS, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

ANNA STRASBERG; MARK ROESLER, Esquire, JANE 

DOE, a/k/a Marilyn.cmgworldwide.com; CMG 

WORLDWIDE, INC.; THE ESTATE OF LEE STRASBERG; 

THE LEE STRASBERG THEATRE INSTITUTE; NETWORK 

SOLUTIONS, INC., and JOHN DOES/JANE DOES (1-10), 

Defendants-Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the District of New Jersey 

(D.C. No. 00-CV-03163) 

District Judge: The Honorable John C. Lifland 

Argued: January 16, 2003 

Before: ROTH, FUENTES and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges. 

ORDER AMENDING SLIP OPINION 

It is ordered that the opinion in the above filed February 

20, 2003 be and is hereby amended as follows: 

On page 2, delete "Foundation" and substitute"Forum" 

in its place. 

 

On page 2, delete "Sheri Claire Lewis" and substitute 

"Shari Claire Lewis." 

On page 12, delete "a UDRP proceeding settles a disputed 

proceeding only to the extent that a season-finale 

cliffhanger resolves a sitcom’s storyline -- that is, it 

doesn’t." Substitute in its place "a UDRP proceeding settles 

a domain-name dispute only to the extent that a seasonfinale cliffhanger resolves a sitcom’s storyline-- that is, it 

doesn’t." 

On page 14, delete "This decision in no way reflects an 

intimation that the NAF panel erred in its judgment, but 

merely that UDRP resolutions do not fall under the limited 

judicial review of arbitrators of the FAA." Substitute in its 

place "This decision in no way reflects an intimation that 

the NAP panel erred in its judgment, but merely that UDRP 
resolutions do not fall under the limited judicial review of 

the FAA." 

 /s/Ruggero J. Aldisert 

 Circuit Judge 

Dated: February 25, 2003 

A True Copy: 

Teste: 

 Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals 

 for the Third Circuit 

 2
### §410ff–6. Entrance or admission fees prohibited

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no fees shall be charged for entrance or admission to the park.

(Pub. L. 96–199, title II, §207, Mar. 5, 1980, 94 Stat. 77.)
**Exhibit
      32.1**







**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Green Mountain Power
      Corporation (the "Company") for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Christopher L. Dutton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:




(1)  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/Christopher
                L. DuttonChristopher
                L. Dutton, Chief Executive Officer and PresidentMarch
                14, 2006
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 99901 / April 3, 2024

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-21816

In the Matter of

Brooge Energy Limited, Nicolaas 

Lammert Paardenkooper, and Lina 

Saheb,

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER APPOINTING 

TAX ADMINISTRATOR

On May 4, 2022, the Commission issued an Omnibus Order Directing the Engagement of 

Two Tax Administrators for Appointment on a Case-By-Case Basis in Administrative 

Proceedings that Establish Distribution Funds (the “Omnibus Order”).1 The Omnibus Order 

engaged Miller Kaplan Arase LLP and Heffler, Radetich & Saitta, LLP to serve as the 

Commission’s tax administrator (“Tax Administrator”), for selection and appointment on an 

individual case basis, for calendar years 2022 through 2024 in administrative proceedings where 

the distribution fund may incur tax-related obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) 

under the Department of the Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

The Director of the Division of Enforcement is authorized to appoint a Tax Administrator 

pursuant to the Omnibus Order.2 The Commission staff has requested the appointment of Miller 

Kaplan Arase LLP as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the Omnibus Order, Miller Kaplan Arase 

LLP is appointed as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.3

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 94845 (May 4, 2022).

2

 See Delegation of Authority to Director of the Division of Enforcement, Securities Act Rel. No. 10900 (Dec. 10, 

2020).

3

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(ii).
### §1725b. Forest Service hire authority

#### (a) In general

The Secretary of Agriculture may appoint, without regard to the provisions of subchapter I of chapter 33 of title 5, other than sections 3303 and 3328 of such title, a qualified candidate described in subsection (b) directly to a position with the Department of Agriculture, Forest Service for which the candidate meets Office of Personnel Management qualification standards.

#### (b) Qualifications

Subsection (a) applies to a former resource assistant (as defined in section 203 of the Public Land Corps Act 1 (16 U.S.C. 1722)) who—

(1) completed a rigorous internship with a land managing agency, such as the Forest Service Resource Assistant Program;

(2) successfully fulfilled the requirements of the internship program; and

(3) earned an undergraduate or graduate degree from an accredited institution of higher education (as defined in section 1001 of title 20).

#### (c) Limitation

The direct hire authority under this section may not be exercised with respect to a specific qualified candidate after the end of the 2-year period beginning on the date on which the candidate completed the undergraduate or graduate degree, as the case may be, or has successfully fulfilled the requirements of the internship program, whichever is later.

(Pub. L. 115–334, title XII, §12518, Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 5001.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 203 of the Public Land Corps Act, referred to in subsec. (b), probably means section 203 of the Public Lands Corps Act of 1993, title II of Pub. L. 91–378, which is classified to section 1722 of this title.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 and not as part of the Public Lands Corps Act of 1993 which comprises this subchapter.

1 See References in Text note below.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 67 Referred in House (RFH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 67

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 13, 2020

           Referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for the reappointment of Risa Lavizzo-Mourey as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the 
Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other 
than Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the expiration of the 
term of Risa Lavizzo-Mourey of Pennsylvania on February 21, 2020, is 
filled by the reappointment of the incumbent. The reappointment is for 
a term of six years, beginning on the later of February 21, 2020, or 
the date of enactment of this joint resolution.

            Passed the Senate January 9, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                JULIE E. ADAMS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Astronaut fact book [electronicresource].**
 
1998 | 2000 | 2003 | 2005 | 2013 | 2022
 
SuDoc Number: NAS 1.90/3:
Item Number:0830-C-15 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000951059 
October 29, 2018
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT
C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N (C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2
, SU B P ART B

. SE0 4360A161
EXHIBIT 21

Subsidiaries of Company

                                 Percentage Owned         State of
Subsidiaries                          by Parent         Incorporation

Easy Systems, Inc.                       100               Washington

EdVISION Corporation                     100               California

Harland Benefits Management Corporation   90               Delaware

Harland Business Products, Inc.          100               Delaware

Harland dataPRINT, Inc.                  100               Georgia

Harland Financial Solutions, Inc.        100               Oregon

Harland International Company            100               Georgia

HFS Systems LLC                          100               Delaware

Interlinq Software Corporation           100               Washington

John H. Harland Company of Puerto Rico   100               Georgia

Premier Systems, Inc.                    100               Iowa

Scantron Corporation                     100               Delaware

The Check Store, Inc.                    100               Georgia

Ultradata Corporation                    100               Delaware

This list excludes subsidiaries which, considered in the aggregate as a single
subsidiary, would not constitute a "significant subsidiary".
#### § 83.210 To whom must I distribute my drug-free workplace statement?

You must require that a copy of the statement described in § 83.205 be given to each employee who will be engaged in the performance of any Federal award.
Project No. 

EXPERT STATEMENT 

on the explosive properties of 

Expert statement by: 

Date of issue March 31 , 2008 

Sponsor 

STATEMENT 

From the structural formula of it can be concluded that the substance 

is not explosive. The substance not have the functional groups associated with 

explosive properties or chemical instability. 

Therefore it can be concluded beyond reasonable doubt that 

incapable of causing explosions by action of external heating sources. 

Date: 3.1. 03- L00J Date: !f. ) -' " 

is
§ 570.20 Purpose. The purpose of this subpart is to provide the procedures of the Bureau of Prisons (Bureau) for designating inmates to pre-release community confinement or home detention. ( a ) *Community confinement* is defined as residence in a community treatment center, halfway house, restitution center, mental health facility, alcohol or drug rehabilitation center, or other community correctional facility (including residential re-entry centers); and participation in gainful employment, employment search efforts, community service, vocational training, treatment, educational programs, or similar facility-approved programs during non-residential hours.
( b ) *Home detention* is defined as a program of confinement and supervision that restricts the defendant to his place of residence continuously, except for authorized absences, enforced by appropriate means of surveillance by the probation office or other monitoring authority.
#### Louis Contiello, Respondent, v. Rubin Betensky, Appellant.

No opinion. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.