### - 

## ... 

# , IDEM INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

Mitchell E. Daniels Jr. Governor

Thomas W. Easterly Commissioner



### Ms. Susan Hedman Regional Administrator U

. S. EPA, Region 5
77 West Jackson Boulevard Chicago, Illinois 60604

Dear Ms. Hedman: We Protect Hoosiers and Our Environment.

September 19, 2011 100 North Senate Avenue Indianapo l is, Ind i ana 46204 (317) 232-8603 Tol l Free (800) 451-6027 www.idem.IN

. gov



### RS:CEIVED



# SP' 2 1 

# 2011

LJ

. ::.**~ c~**  OF**aEG~Gf.I\L .~Ln**  •• 1\hl '·



### Re: State Implementation Plan Submittal for Indiana Regarding 326 lAC 3 and 326 lAC 7-2- 1; Compliance Monitoring (LSA #05-330)

Pursuant to Section 110 of the 1990 Clean Air Act and Title 13 of the Indiana Code, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) submits an amendment to the Indiana state implementation plan (SIP). IDEM requests review and approval into the SIP of the amendments to Indiana's compliance monitoring rules at 326 lAC 3 and 326 lAC 7-2-1 (LSA #05-330(F)).

In order to assist with your review of this state implementation plan submission, a list of supporting documents is attached.

Throughout the development of these amendments to the existing rule, staff of the Office of Air Quality worked closely with your staff to ensure that any potential problems that might exist with this requested SIP revision would be resolved. I request that the United States Environmental Protection Agency approve these modifications of Indiana's SIP. If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Scott Deloney, Air Programs Branch Chief, Office of Air Quality at (317) 233-5694.

Sincerely,

# ~B.~ Keith Baugues Assistant Commissioner, Office of Air Quality

KB/sb Attachments: Supporting Documents

cc: John Mooney, U.S. EPA Region 

### 5 (w/enclosures) Steve Rosenthal, U.S. EPA Region 5 (no enclosures) Scott Deloney, IDEM (no enclosures) Christine Pedersen, IDEM (no enclosures) SIP file

Recycled Paper 

### @ · An E qual Oppo rtuni ty Empl oyer Pl e a se Recycle 

## 0Recycled Paper 

### @ 

### Supporting Documents

Attachment A: Final rule. LSA Document #05-330(F) as published in the Indiana Register on September 7, 2011 (DIN: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA)

Attachment B: Signature Page

Attachment C: Second Notice as published in the Indiana Register on March 31, 2010 (DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA)

Attachment D: Publisher's Affidavits

Attachment E: Transcript of First Public Hearing held on December 1, 2010

Attachment F: Transcript of Second Public Hearing held on May 4, 2011

Attachment G: Proposed rule as published in the Indiana Register on January 19, 2011 (DIN: 2011 00119-IR-326050330PRA)

Attachment H: Response to Comments from Third Comment Period

Attachment 

## 1: Adn1l'nistrative Checklist (40 CFR 51, Appendix V)

An Equal Opportunity Employer Please Recycle 

### Q

# A PPENDIX 

# ATITLE 326 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

Final Rule LSA Document #05-330(F)

DIGEST

Amends 326 IAC 3- 4- 1

, 326 IAC 3- 4- 2

, 326 IAC 3- 4- 3

, 326 IAC 3- 5- 1

, 326 IAC 3- 5- 2

, 326 IAC 3- 5- 3

, 326 IAC 3- 5- 4

, 326 IAC 3- 5- 5

, 326 IAC 3- 5- 6

, 326 IAC 3- 5- 7

, 326 IAC 3- 6- 1

, 326 IAC 3- 6- 2

, 326 IAC 3- 6- 3

, 326 IAC 3- 6- 4

, 326 IAC 3- 6- 5

, 326 IAC 3- 7- 1

, 326 IAC 3- 7- 2

, 326 IAC 3- 7- 3

, 326 IAC 3- 7- 4 , and 326 IAC 3- 7- 5 and adds 326 IAC 3- 5- 8 concerning compliance monitoring. Amends 326 IAC 7- 2- 1 concerning sulfur dioxide compliance requirements. Effective 30 days after filing with the Publisher.

HISTORY First Notice of Comment Period: December 1, 2005, Indiana Register (29 IR 899). Second Notice of Comment Period: March 31, 2010, Indiana Register (DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA ). Notice of First Hearing: March 31, 2010, Indiana Register (DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330PHA ). Continuation of Second Notice of Comment Period: May 12, 2010, Indiana Register (DIN: 20100512-IR-326050330SCA ). Change in Notice of First Hearing: August 4, 2010, Indiana Register (DIN: 20100804-IR-326050330CHA ). Change in Notice of First Hearing: October 20, 2010, Indiana Register (DIN: 20101020-IR-326050330CHA ). Date of First Hearing: December 1, 2010. Proposed Rule and Notice of Third Comment Period: January 19, 2011, Indiana Register (DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA ). Notice of Second Hearing: January 19, 2011, Indiana Register (DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PHA ). Change in Notice of Second Hearing: March 9, 2011, Indiana Register (DIN: 20110309-IR-326050330CHA ). Date of Second Hearing: May 4, 2011.

326 IAC 3- 4- 1 ; 326 IAC 3- 4- 2 ; 326 IAC 3- 4- 3 ; 326 IAC 3- 5- 1 ; 326 IAC 3- 5- 2 ; 326 IAC 3- 5- 3 ; 326 IAC 3- 5- 4 ; 326 IAC 3- 5- 5 ; 326 IAC 3- 5- 6 ; 326 IAC 3- 5- 7 ; 326 IAC 3- 5- 8 ; 326 IAC 3- 6- 1 ; 326 IAC 3- 6- 2 ; 326 IAC 3- 6- 3 ; 326 IAC 3- 6- 4 ; 326 IAC 3- 6- 5 ; 326 IAC 3- 7- 1 ; 326 IAC 3- 7- 2 ; 326 IAC 3- 7- 3 ; 326 IAC 3- 7- 4 ; 326 IAC 3- 7- 5 ; 326 IAC 7- 2- 1

SECTION 1. 326 IAC 3- 4- 1 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 4- 1 Definitions Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 11 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 1. In addition to the definitions provided in IC 13- 11

, 326 IAC 1- 2 , and 326 IAC 2- 7 , the following definitions apply throughout this article unless expressly stated otherwise: (1) "Applicable emission limitation or standard" means any of the following: (A) A state or federal emission limitation or standard applicable to a regulated hazardous air pollutant under 40 CFR 61* or 40 CFR 63*. (B) A state or federal emission limitation or standard applicable to a regulated air pollutant, other than a hazardous air pollutant under Section 112 of the CAA, for which the source is classified as a major source. (2) (1) "Calendar quarter" means a consecutive three (3) month period (nonoverlapping) beginning on: (A) January 1; (B) April 1; (C) July 1; or (D) October 1. (3) "Certified emissions monitor" means an emissions monitor that meets all applicable performance specifications of 40 CFR 60* or any other performance specification, and for which performance data has been submitted to and approved by the department. (2) "Capture system" means the equipment, including hoods, ducts, fans, and booths, that is used to contain, capture, and transport a pollutant to a control device. (3) "Continuous emission monitoring system" or "CEMS" means the equipment required by the applicable permit, state rule, or federal regulation used to sample, analyze, measure, and provide a continuous, permanent record of emissions in units of the applicable standard or other form. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:01:20AM EDT DIN: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA Page 1(4) "Continuous opacity monitoring system" or "COMS" means the equipment required by the

applicable permit, state rule, or federal regulation used to measure the opacity of the effluent on a continuous basis as either of the following: (A) The optical density of the effluent gas. (B) The opacity of the effluent gas. (5) "Data" means the results of any type of monitoring or method, including the results of: (A) instrumental or noninstrumental monitoring; (B) emission calculations; (C) manual sampling procedures; (D) record keeping procedures; or (E) any other form of information collection procedure used in connection with any type of monitoring or method. (6) "Emission limitation or standard" means the following: (A) Any applicable requirement contained in this title that constitutes: (i) an emission limitation or standard; (ii) a standard of performance; or (iii) a means of emission limitation. (B) An emission limitation or standard may be expressed: (i) in terms of the pollutant, either as: (AA) a specific quantity, rate, or concentration of emissions; or (BB) the relationship of uncontrolled to controlled emissions; or (ii) as either: (AA) a work practice; (BB) a process or control devices parameter; or (CC) another form of specific: (aa) design; (bb) equipment; (cc) operational; or (dd) operation and maintenance; requirement. (C) For purposes of 326 IAC 3- 8 , an emission limitation or standard shall not include general operation requirements that an owner or operator may be required to meet. (4) (7) "Emission test", "source sampling test", "compliance test", or "performance test" means a procedure for sampling a gas stream from a single sampling location at a facility, an emissions unit, or pollution control equipment, to determine a pollutant emission rate, concentration, or parameter while the facility, emissions unit, or pollution control equipment is operating at conditions that result in measurement of the highest emission or parameter values (prior to any control device), or at other operating conditions approved by the department or U.S. EPA. A test shall comprise three (3) sampling runs for a specified sampling time span. Additional conditions may be required by applicable rules, permit, or enforcement order. The test owner or operator shall be performed perform the test using sampling and analytical procedures approved by the department or U.S. EPA for the specific pollutant or parameter and facility, emissions unit, pollution control equipment, process, or operation. (5) (8) "Emissions unit" means any part of or activity at a source that emits or has the potential to emit any regulated air pollutant for which an emission limitation or standard has been established. This term does not alter or affect the definition of the term "unit" for purposes of Title IV of the CAA or of the term "emissions unit" for purposes of Title V of the CAA. has the meaning set forth in 326 IAC 1- 2- 23.5

. (9) "Exceedance" means a condition that: (A) is detected by monitoring that provides data in terms of an emission limitation or standard; and (B) indicates that emissions (or opacity) are greater than the applicable emission limitation or standard (or less than the applicable standard in the case of a percent reduction requirement) consistent with any averaging period specified for averaging the results of the monitoring. (10) "Malfunction" means any sudden, infrequent, and not reasonably preventable failure of air pollution control equipment, process equipment, or a process to operate in a normal or usual manner. Failures that are caused in part by poor maintenance or careless operation are not malfunctions. For purposes of this article, a CEMS or COMS is considered process equipment. (6) "Major source" means any major source as defined in 326 IAC 2- 7- 1 (22), excluding any source described in 326 IAC 2- 7- 1 (22)(A). (7) (11) "Monitoring" means any form of collecting data on a routine basis to determine or otherwise assess compliance with emission limitations or standards. The term includes the following: (A) Record keeping, if records are used to determine or assess compliance with an emission limitation or standard, including: Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:01:20AM EDT DIN: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA Page 2(i) records of raw material content and usage;

(ii) records that document compliance with work practice requirements; or (iii) other records used to determine or assess compliance with an emission limitation or standard. (B) Compliance method tests that are conducted on a routine periodic basis. (C) One (1) or more of the following data collection techniques, where appropriate, for a particular circumstance: (i) Continuous emission or opacity monitoring systems. (ii) Continuous process, capture system, control device, or other relevant parameter monitoring systems or procedures, including a PEMS. (iii) Emission estimation and calculation procedures. (iv) Maintenance and analysis of records of fuel or raw materials usage. (v) Recording results of a program or protocol to conduct specific operation and maintenance procedures. (vi) Verification of emissions, process parameters, capture system parameters, or control device parameters, using portable or in situ measurement devices. (vii) Visible emission observations. (viii) Any other form of measuring, recording, or verifying on a routine basis emissions, process parameters, capture system parameters, control device parameters, or other factors relevant to assessing compliance with an emission limitation or standard. (8) "Monitor system malfunction" means any interruption in the collection of valid data as a result of the failure of any component of the system to operate within the specifications of the applicable performance specification. (9) (12) "Out of control" means any data collected by a continuous monitoring system during periods immediately following an out of tolerance quality assurance assessment and prior to an acceptable quality assurance assessment. (10) "Permit" means any applicable permit issued, renewed, amended, revised, or modified under 326 IAC 2- 1

, 326 IAC 2- 2

, 326 IAC 2- 3

, 326 IAC 2- 7

, 326 IAC 2- 8

, or 326 IAC 2- 9

. (13) "Peaking unit" means an emissions unit that has: (A) an average capacity factor of not more than ten and zero-tenths percent (10.0%) during the previous three (3) calendar years; and (B) a capacity factor of not more than twenty and zero-tenths percent (20.0%) in each of those calendar years. (14) "Predictive emission monitoring system" or "PEMS" means a system that uses process and other parameters as inputs to a computer program or other data reduction system to produce values in terms of the applicable emission limitation or standard. (15) "QA operating quarter" means a calendar quarter in which there are at least one hundred sixty-eight (168) unit operating hours, as defined in subdivision (18), or, for a common stack or bypass stack, a calendar quarter in which there are at least one hundred sixty-eight (168) stack operating hours, as defined in subdivision (17). (11) (16) "Quality assurance" means those activities performed to ensure that monitoring data are sufficiently representative, accurate, precise, reliable, frequent, and timely. Those activities include, but are not limited to, frequent activities (daily) and less frequent activities (weekly, monthly, quarterly, and yearly). establish validity of data used to demonstrate compliance. (17) "Stack operating hour" means a clock hour during which flue gases flow through a particular stack or duct, either for the entire hour or for part of the hour, while any associated emissions units are combusting fuel. (18) "Unit operating hour" means a clock hour during which an emissions unit combusts any fuel, either for part of the hour or for the entire hour.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 4- 1 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2062; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1566; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 30; filed Aug 11, 2011, 1:54 p.m.: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA )

SECTION 2. 326 IAC 3- 4- 2 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:01:20AM EDT DIN: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA Page 3326 IAC 3- 4- 2 Certification

Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 2. Each report submitted under this article shall contain a certification of truth, accuracy, and completeness. This certification and any other certification required under this article shall state that, based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements and information in the document are true, accurate, and complete. Reports submitted under 326 IAC 3- 8 shall meet the certification requirements of 326 IAC 2- 7- 4 (f). (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 4- 2 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2063; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477; filed Aug 11, 2011, 1:54 p.m.: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA )

SECTION 3. 326 IAC 3- 4- 3 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 4- 3 Conversion factors Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 3. (a) Owners or operators of facilities emissions units subject to this article shall use the following procedures for converting monitoring data to units of the standard where necessary: (1) For The owner or operator of a fossil fuel-fired steam generators, generator shall use the following procedures shall be used to convert gaseous emission monitoring data in parts per million (ppm) to pounds per million British thermal units (Btu) (lbs/MMBtu) where necessary: (A) When the owner or operator of a fossil fuel-fired steam generator elects under this article to measure oxygen (O 2 ) in flue gases, the measurements of owner or operator shall measure the pollutant concentration and oxygen shall be on a dry basis and use the following conversion procedure: used:

(B) When the owner or operator elects under this article to measure carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) in flue gases, the measurement of owner or operator shall measure the pollutant concentration and the CO 2 concentration shall each be on a consistent basis (wet or dry) and use the following conversion procedure: used:

(C) When the owner or operator elects under this article to measure sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) or nitrogen oxides (NO

x ) in the flue gases, the measurement of owner or operator shall measure the diluent concentration and the SO 2 and or the NO

x concentration shall each be on a wet basis and use the following conversion procedure, used, except where wet scrubbers are employed or where moisture is otherwise added to the stack gases:

(D) When the owner or operator elects under this article to measure SO 2 or NO

x in the flue gases, the measurement of owner or operator shall measure the diluent concentration and the SO 2 and or the NO

x concentration shall each be on a wet basis and use the following conversion procedure, shall be used where wet scrubbers or moisture is otherwise present in the stack gases, provided water vapor content of the stack gas is measured at least once every fifteen (15) minutes at the same point as the pollutant and oxygen measurements are made: Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:01:20AM EDT DIN: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA Page 4(E) The values used in the equations under this subdivision are derived as follows:

C
ws = Pollutant concentration at stack conditions in grams per wet standard cubic meter

(g/wscm) or pounds per wet standard cubic meter (lbs/wscm), determined by
multiplying the average concentration in parts per million (ppm) for each one (1) hour

period by 4.15 × 10 -5 M g/wscm per ppm or 2.59 × 10 -9 M lbs/wscm per ppm, where M
is pollutant molecular weight in grams per gram-mole (g/g-mole) or pounds per
pound-mole (lb/lb-mole).

M = 64.07 for SO 2 and 46.01 for oxides of nitrogen (NO

x ) as NO 2 . C = Pollutant concentration at stack conditions in pounds per dry standard cubic meter

(lbs/dscm) or grams per dry standard cubic meter (g/dscm). F, F
c = A factor representing a ratio of the volume of dry flue gases generated to the calorific

value of the fuel combusted (F), and a factor representing a ratio of the volume of carbon dioxide generated to the calorific value of the fuel combusted (F
c ), respectively.
Values of F and F
c are given in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 19*, as applicable.

F
w = A factor representing a ratio of the volume of wet flue gases generated to the calorific

value of the fuel combusted. Values of F

w are given in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method
19*.

B
wa = Proportion by volume of water vapor in the ambient air.

B
ws = Proportion by volume of water vapor in the stack gas. E = Pollutant emission, lbs/MMBtu.
Percent O 2 , percent CO 2 = Oxygen or carbon dioxide volume (expressed as percent) determined with equipment

specified under this article.

Percent O 2ws = Oxygen volume (expressed as percent) measurements made at stack conditions on a

wet basis. (2) For sulfuric acid plants, or production facilities, the owner or operator shall: (A) establish a conversion factor three (3) times daily according to the procedures of 40 CFR 60.84(b)*; (B) multiply the conversion factor by the average sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) concentration in the flue gases to obtain average SO 2 emissions in pounds per ton (lbs/ton); and (C) report the average sulfur dioxide emissions for each three (3) hour period in excess of the emission standard set forth in 326 IAC 7 in the quarterly summary. report.

(b) The department may approve alternate procedures for computing emission averages that do not require integration of data or alternative methods of converting pollutant concentration measurements to units of the emission standard may be approved by the department if the owner or operator shows that the alternate procedures are at least as accurate as those in this rule.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 4- 3; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2063; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1566; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 31; filed Aug 11, 2011, 1:54 p.m.: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA ) Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:01:20AM EDT DIN: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA Page 5SECTION 4. 326 IAC 3- 5- 1 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 5- 1 Applicability; continuous monitoring requirements for applicable pollutants Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 1. (a) This rule establishes the following: (1) Substantive requirements for monitoring certain types of sources. (2) A process for developing suitable monitoring requirements for other types of sources.

(b) (a) This rule applies to the following sources and facilities hereinafter referred to as affected facilities: or emissions units to determine compliance with an emission limitation or standard: (1) Any facility emissions unit required to perform continuous monitoring under 326 IAC 12

. which incorporates by reference the requirements of 40 CFR 60*, or by a standard for hazardous air pollutants under 326 IAC 14

, which incorporates by reference the requirements of 40 CFR 61*, or 326 IAC 20

, which incorporates by reference the requirements of 40 CFR 63*. (2) Fossil fuel-fired steam generators of greater than one hundred million (100,000,000) British thermal units (Btus) (Btu) per hour heat input capacity. (3) Sulfuric acid plants or production facilities of greater than three hundred (300) tons per day acid production capacity. (4) Petroleum refinery catalyst regenerators for fluid bed catalytic cracking units of greater than twenty thousand (20,000) barrels or eight hundred forty thousand (840,000) gallons per day fresh feed capacity. (5) Portland cement plants. (6) Facilities Sources or emissions units that combust sewage sludge. (7) Sources or emissions units making coke from raw materials, including the following: (A) Coal refining byproducts. (B) Petroleum refining byproducts. (8) Facilities Emissions units in Clark and Floyd Counties that: (A) have potential to emit nitrogen oxides (NO

x ) of greater than or equal to forty (40) tons per year; and (B) are located at sources that have potential to emit NO

x of greater than or equal to one hundred (100) tons per year as described in 326 IAC 10

. (9) Any emissions unit required to monitor under subsection (c).

(c) (b) Owners and operators of sources and facilities or emissions units described in subsection (b) (a) are subject to the following requirements: (1) Any facility emissions unit subject to 326 IAC 12 which incorporates by reference the requirements of 40 CFR 60*, 326 IAC 14

, which incorporates by reference the requirements of 40 CFR 61*, or 326 IAC 20

, which incorporates by reference the requirements of 40 CFR 61*, shall comply with the following: (A) The monitoring and reporting requirements as specified for the applicable rule. (B) All requirements of this rule. (2) The owner or operator of a fossil fuel-fired steam generators generator of greater than one hundred million (100,000,000) Btu per hour heat input capacity shall continuously monitor the following: (A) Opacity, unless one (1) of the following occurs: (i) Gaseous fuel is the only fuel combusted. (ii) Oil or a mix of gas and oil are the only fuels combusted and the facility emissions unit is able to comply with both of the following rules without using particulate matter collection equipment: (AA) 326 IAC 5- 1

. (BB) 326 IAC 6- 2

. (iii) An alternative monitoring requirement request has been granted by the department and approved by U.S. EPA. The owner or operator may request an alternative monitoring requirement may be requested when installation of an opacity monitoring system would not provide accurate determinations of emissions as a result of interference from condensed uncombined water vapor. Any alternative monitoring requirement request shall address the following: (AA) Information pertaining to the inability of the affected facility emissions unit to find an acceptable monitoring location prior to the source of the condensed, uncombined water vapor. (BB) A list of proposed alternative monitoring requirements. For each proposed alternative monitoring requirement, the request must provide a detailed description of thresholds or triggers for corrective action Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:01:20AM EDT DIN: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA Page 6resulting from deviation from normal operating parameters and how deviations from key surrogate

parameters shall be addressed to insure ensure continuous compliance with all applicable particulate and opacity requirements. An example of an acceptable alternative monitoring requirement is a particulate compliance demonstration that is no less frequent than annual performed at least annually, in accordance with 326 IAC 3- 6 and a compliance monitoring plan that, at a minimum, satisfies monitoring requirements under 326 IAC 2- 7 or 326 IAC 2- 8

. (CC) Record keeping that is consistent with section 6 of this rule. (DD) Reporting frequency that is no less frequent than that required in section 7 of this rule. (iv) An alternative monitoring requirement request granted by the department under item (iii) shall be submitted to U.S. EPA as a state implementation plan (SIP) revision and shall not be in effect until approved as a SIP revision. (B) Sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) under the following conditions: (i) SO 2 pollution control equipment has been installed. (ii) A monitor is required to determine compliance with either: of the following: (AA) 326 IAC 12 ; or (BB) a new construction permit or operating permit required under 326 IAC 2

. (C) Nitrogen oxide (NO

x ) under the following conditions: (i) NO

x pollution control equipment has been installed. (ii) A monitor is required to determine compliance with either: of the following: (AA) 326 IAC 12 ; or (BB) a new construction permit or operating permit required under 326 IAC 2

. (D) The percent oxygen (O 2 ) or carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) if measurements of O 2 or CO 2 in the flue gas are required to convert either SO 2 or NO

x continuous monitoring data, or both, to units of the emission limitation for the particular facility. emissions unit. (3) Sulfuric acid plants or production facilities of greater than three hundred (300) tons per day acid production capacity shall monitor SO 2 for each sulfuric acid producing facility emissions unit within the source. (4) Petroleum refinery catalyst regenerators for fluid bed catalytic cracking units of greater than twenty thousand (20,000) barrels or eight hundred forty thousand (840,000) gallons per day fresh feed capacity shall monitor opacity for each regenerator within the source. (5) Portland cement plants shall monitor opacity at the following facilities: emissions units: (A) Kilns. (B) Clinker coolers. (6) Facilities Sources or emissions units that combust sewage sludge shall monitor from the effluent gas exiting the incinerator the following: (A) Total hydrocarbons. (B) Oxygen. (C) Moisture, unless an alternative method is approved by the department and the U.S. EPA. (D) Temperature. (7) Sources or emissions units making coke from coal shall monitor opacity on the underfire stack associated with each coke oven battery. (8) Facilities Emissions units in Clark and Floyd counties that have potential to emit NO

x greater than or equal to forty (40) tons per year and are located at sources that have potential to emit NO

x greater than or equal to one hundred (100) tons per year shall install NO

x continuous emission monitors as described in 326 IAC 10- 1

.

(c) Upon approval by the department, the owner or operator of an emissions unit required to continuously monitor opacity under this section may be exempted from the requirement to install, certify, and operate a COMS if: (1) a particulate CEMS for measuring PM emissions is used to demonstrate continuous compliance with any applicable emissions limitation; and (2) the particulate CEMS is installed, certified, operated, and maintained on the affected source in accordance with the requirements of Performance Specification 11 (PS-11)* and Procedure 2 of 40 CFR 60, Appendix F*.

(d) The department may require, as a condition of a construction or operating permit issued under 326 IAC 2- 1

, 326 IAC 2- 1.1
, 326 IAC 2- 2

, 326 IAC 2- 3

, 326 IAC 2- 7

, 326 IAC 2- 8 , or 326 IAC 2- 9 that the owner or operator of a new or existing source of air emissions monitor emissions to ensure compliance with the following: (1) An emission limitation or standard established in one (1) of the permits listed in this subsection. (2) Permit requirements. (3) Monitoring requirements in 326 IAC 7

. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:01:20AM EDT DIN: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA Page 7(e) Unless explicitly stated otherwise, nothing in this rule shall:

(1) excuse the owner or operator of a source or emissions unit from any monitoring, record keeping, or reporting requirement that applies under any provision of the CAA or state statutes or regulations; rules; or (2) restrict the authority of the department to impose additional or more restrictive monitoring, record keeping, testing, or reporting requirements on any owner or operator of a source or emissions unit under any other provision of the CAA, including Section 114(a)(1), or state statutes or regulations, rules, as applicable.

(f) Within one hundred eighty (180) days of startup or, for a source existing on the effective date of this rule, within three hundred sixty-five (365) days of becoming an affected facility under this rule, All continuous monitoring systems shall be installed and operational and have the certification testing complete pursuant to under section 3 of this rule within one hundred eighty (180) days of start-up of the emissions unit.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies of these documents may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 5- 1 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2064; filed Dec 20, 2001, 4:30 p.m.: 25 IR 1596; errata filed Jan 7, 2002, 2:20 p.m.: 25 IR 1644; filed Aug 11, 2011, 1:54 p.m.: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA )

SECTION 5. 326 IAC 3- 5- 2 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 5- 2 Minimum performance and operating specifications Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 2. Owners and operators of monitoring equipment installed to comply with this rule shall comply with the performance specifications and operating requirements as follows: (1) Performance specifications set forth in 40 CFR 60, Appendix B*, shall be used to certify monitoring equipment installed pursuant to this rule; however, where reference is made to the administrator in 40 CFR 60, Appendix B*, the term "department" shall be inserted for purposes of this rule, and where continuous emissions monitors were installed prior to March 1983 for measuring opacity, the performance specifications in 40 CFR 60, Appendix B*, 1982 Edition, shall apply. (2) Cycling times, which include the total time a monitoring system requires to sample, analyze, and record an emission measurement, shall be as follows: (A) Continuous monitoring systems for measuring opacity shall complete a minimum of one (1) cycle of operation (sampling, analyzing, and data recording) for each successive ten (10) second period. (B) Continuous monitoring systems that measure the following emissions shall complete a minimum of one (1) cycle of operation (sampling, analyzing, and data recording) for each successive fifteen (15) minute measuring period: (i) Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ). (ii) Carbon monoxide (CO). (iii) Hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S). (iv) Oxides of nitrogen (NO

x ). (v) Oxygen (O 2 ). (vi) Sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ). (vii) Total hydrocarbons (THC). (viii) Total reduced sulfur (TRS). (ix) Volatile organic compounds (VOC). (x) Particulate matter (PM). (3) For opacity monitoring when effluent from two (2) or more affected facilities is emissions units are combined before being released to the atmosphere, the owner or operator may either install a COMS: (A) install a continuous opacity monitoring system on the combined effluent; or (B) install a continuous opacity monitoring system comprised of, and capable of combining the signals from, component transmissometers on each effluent stream. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:01:20AM EDT DIN: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA Page 8Results shall be reported on combined effluent. This requirement shall not apply to facilities utilizing

emissions units using wet flue gas desulfurization equipment. For facilities emissions units using wet flue gas desulfurization equipment, opacity may be reported on the combined exhaust or on individual exhausts except as provided for facilities emissions units affected by an NSPS as described at 40 CFR 60.13(i)*. Compliance for facilities emissions units that opt to report on the individual exhausts shall be determined on the individual exhausts based on data provided in accordance with section 7 of this rule. (4) When the effluent from two (2) or more affected facilities emissions units subject to the same emission standard, other than opacity, are combined before being released to the atmosphere, the owner or operator may report the results as required for each affected facility emissions unit or for the combined effluent. (5) Instrument full-scale response or upper limit of concentration measurement range for all opacity monitoring systems shall be set at one hundred percent (100%) opacity if possible. If the monitoring system is a requirement of required by 40 CFR 60*, 40 CFR 61*, 40 CFR 63*, or 40 CFR 75*, then the appropriate instrument span values and cycling times pursuant to the applicable part shall be used. In all cases, the manufacturer's procedures for calibration shall be followed and may result in an upscale maximum response of less than one hundred percent (100%). The minimum instrument full-scale response for gaseous monitoring systems shall be set at two hundred percent (200%) of the expected instrument data display output corresponding to the emission limitation for the facility emissions unit unless a request for an alternative setting that provides the following information is submitted to and approved by the department and U.S. EPA in writing: (A) The proposed alternate instrument span value. (B) The expected range of pollutant measured concentrations. (C) The control device in use. (D) The process to be controlled. (E) The location of the monitor, such as stack or duct. (F) The reason for requesting the alternate instrument span value. (6) The department and U.S. EPA may approve locations for installing continuous monitoring systems or monitoring devices that vary from locations provided under the performance specifications of 40 CFR 60, Appendix B*, shall be approved by the department and the U.S. EPA upon a demonstration by the owner or operator that installation at alternative locations will enable accurate and representative measurements. (7) Owners or operators of affected facilities emissions units shall conduct continuous emission monitoring system CEMS performance evaluations, upon the request of the department or U.S. EPA, to demonstrate continuing compliance of the continuous emission monitoring systems CEMS with performance specifications as follows: (A) A performance evaluation is a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the performance of the continuous emission monitor in terms of: (i) accuracy; (ii) precision; (iii) reliability; (iv) representativeness; and (v) comparability; of the data acquired by the monitoring system. (B) The department or U.S. EPA may request owners or operators of affected facilities, emissions units,

as defined described in section 1(b) section 1(a) of this rule, to conduct continuous emission monitoring system CEMS performance evaluations if the department has reason to believe, based on review of monitoring data, quality assurance data, inspections, or other information, that the continuous emission monitoring system CEMS is malfunctioning or may be providing invalid data over an extended period. (C) The owner or operator of an affected emissions unit shall submit a written report containing the complete information of the performance evaluations shall be furnished to the department within forty-five (45) days after the test date. The department or U.S. EPA may conduct performance evaluations of the continuous emission monitoring systems CEMS at any time in order to verify the continued compliance of the systems with the performance specifications.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 5- 2 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2066; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1566; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 32; filed Aug 11, 2011, 1:54 p.m.: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA ) Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:01:20AM EDT DIN: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA Page 9SECTION 6. 326 IAC 3- 5- 3 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 5- 3 Monitor system certification Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 3. Monitor system certification requirements apply to sources and facilities or emissions units subject to this rule as follows: (1) The owner or operator shall conduct the applicable performance specifications tests in accordance with the procedures specified in 40 CFR 60*, or other applicable federal regulations, for the required monitoring system as follows: (A) Not later than one hundred eighty (180) days after a facility emissions unit start-up or initial monitor installation date. (B) Not later than forty-five (45) emissions unit operating days after the date of monitor replacement, date, or significant monitor repair, as described in IDEM's Quality Assurance Manual, Chapter 20 (dated June 20, 1997)** which affects the ability of the analyzer to function date. such as: (i) replacing or switching a major component of the monitor; or (ii) major overhaul or reconditioning of the monitor that affects the ability of the analyzer to measure emissions accurately. (2) The owner or operator shall notify the department in writing as follows: (A) No less than fourteen (14) days in advance of the start of continuous opacity monitor (COM) system (COMS) certification. (B) No less than thirty-five (35) days in advance of the certification of a gaseous monitoring system. (3) The owner or operator shall submit all of the required test data and information in the form of a written report to the department for review and approval within forty-five (45) days of completion of the performance specification test. (4) The department shall issue a written notice of certification status upon review of the complete certification test report. A required monitoring system is certified when the department issues a certification letter stating that the required monitoring system, including all applicable components, has satisfactorily met all federal and state monitoring requirements. (5) The department may decertify a required monitoring system if an audit or performance evaluation reveals that such the monitoring system or a component thereof does not meet applicable performance specifications or requirements. The owner or operator shall repeat the certification process for the required monitoring system within forty-five (45) days of the date of the department's decertification of the required monitoring system.

*This document is incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204.

**This document is incorporated by reference. Copies are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center-North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 5- 3; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2067; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 33; filed Aug 11, 2011, 1:54 p.m.: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA )

SECTION 7. 326 IAC 3- 5- 4 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 5- 4 Standard operating procedures Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17 Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:01:20AM EDT DIN: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA Page 10Sec. 4. (a) The owner or operator of each affected facility specified in section 1(b) of this rule, any facility

subject to 326 IAC 12

, or any other facility required to monitor emissions on a continuous basis shall submit to the department, Within ninety (90) days after monitor installation, a complete, written continuous monitoring standard operating procedures procedure (SOP) must be submitted to the department by the owner or operator of: (1) each affected source or emissions unit specified in section 1(a) of this rule; or (2) any other source or emissions unit required to monitor emissions on a continuous basis.

(b) If revisions are made to the SOP, the owner or operator must submit updates shall be submitted to the department biennially. within two (2) years of the revisions.

(c) At a minimum, the SOP shall describe complete step-by-step procedures and operations as follows: (1) A description of the facility emissions unit monitored. (2) A listing of the following for each monitor: (A) Each monitor's brand. (A) Manufacturer's name. (B) Model number. (C) Serial number. (D) Monitoring location. (E) Data handling and acquisition system. (3) Examples of all reporting and log forms. (4) Record keeping and reporting procedures that include the following: (A) Reporting of instrument precision and accuracy. (B) Reporting of emissions data. (5) Methods and procedures for analysis and data acquisition. (6) Calibration procedures that include the following: (A) Calibration error limits and linearity. (B) Calibration gas type, gas quality, and traceability to the National Institute of Standards and Technology. (C) Calibration frequency. (D) Criteria for recalibration, and analysis procedures to periodically verify the accuracy of span and calibration standards. (7) Operation procedures that include: (A) daily procedures; (B) quantifying and recording daily zero (0) and high level drift that meet the requirements of: (i) 40 CFR 60, Appendix B*, Performance Specification 2, Section 4.2; or (ii) other applicable regulations; and (C) other operating parameter checks indicating correct operational status. (8) Quality control and quality assurance procedures that include the following: (A) A statement of quality policy and objectives. (B) Organization and responsibilities description. (C) Calibration and span and zero (0) drift criteria. (D) Excessive drift criteria. (E) Corrective action for excessive drift. (F) Precision and accuracy audits. (G) Corrective action for accuracy audits failure. (H) Data validity criteria. (I) Participation in department audits. (J) Data recording and calculation audits. (9) Preventive maintenance procedures and corrective maintenance procedures that include those procedures taken to ensure continuous operation and to minimize malfunctions. (10) A listing of the manufacturer's recommended spare parts inventory.

(b) (d) If a [sic, an] facility emissions unit owner or operator fails to submit a SOP or submits a SOP that fails to address the factors procedures and operations provided under subsection (a), (c), the department may require a performance evaluation pursuant to section 2 of this rule.

*This document is incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:01:20AM EDT DIN: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA Page 11(Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 5- 4 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2068; errata filed Dec 12, 2002,

3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 34; filed Aug 11, 2011, 1:54 p.m.: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA )

SECTION 8. 326 IAC 3- 5- 5 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 5- 5 Quality assurance requirements Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 5. (a) Except where for affected units under 40 CFR 75* is applicable for affected facilities under the acid rain program that are also emissions units subject to this rule, quality assurance requirements specified in this section and 40 CFR 60*, Appendix F, apply to continuous emission monitors that monitor the following: (1) Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ). (2) Carbon monoxide (CO). (3) Hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S). (4) Nitrogen oxide (NO

x ). (5) Oxygen (O 2 ). (6) Sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ). (7) Total hydrocarbons (THC). (8) Total reduced sulfur (TRS). (9) Volatile organic compounds (VOC). (10) Particulate matter (PM).

(b) Facilities Emissions units that are also subject to 40 CFR 75* shall follow the quality assurance procedures of 40 CFR 75* and report the results in accordance with subsection (e). (f).

(c) Quality control (QC) requirements for continuous opacity monitoring systems COMS are as follows: (1) For calibration drift (CD) assessment, the COMS shall be checked at least once daily. The CD shall be quantified and recorded at zero (0) (or low level) and upscale level opacity. The COMS shall be adjusted whenever the CD exceeds the specification of 40 CFR 60, Appendix B*, Performance Specification 1 (PS-1), and the COMS shall be declared out of control when the CD exceeds twice the specification of PS-1. Corrective actions, followed by a validating CD assessment, are required when the COMS is out of control. (2) For fault indicators assessment, the fault lamp indicators, data acquisition system error messages, and other system self-diagnostic indicators shall be checked at least daily. Appropriate corrective actions shall be taken when the COMS is operating outside the preset limits. (3) For performance audits, checks of the individual COMS components and factors affecting the accuracy of the monitoring data, as described in this subdivision, shall be conducted, at a minimum, on a calendar quarter basis. The absolute minimum checks included in the performance audit are as follows: (A) The status of the optical alignment of the monitor components shall be checked and recorded according to the procedure specified by the monitor manufacturer. Monitor components must be realigned as necessary. (B) The apparent effluent opacity shall be compared and recorded before and after cleaning each of the exposed optical surfaces. The total optical surface dust accumulation shall be determined by summing up the apparent reductions in opacity for all of the optical surfaces that are cleaned. Caution should be employed in performing this check since fluctuations in effluent opacity occurring during the cleaning cycle may adversely affect the results. (C) The zero (0) and upscale response errors shall be determined and recorded according to the CD procedures. The errors are defined as the difference (in percent opacity) between the correct value and the observed value for the zero (0) and high level calibration checks. (D) The value of the zero (0) compensation applied at the time of the audit shall be calculated as equivalent opacity, corrected to stack exit conditions, according to the procedures specified by the manufacturer. The compensation applied to the effluent recorded by the monitor system shall be recorded. (E) The optical pathlength correction ratio (OPLR) shall be computed from the monitor pathlength and stack exit diameter and shall be compared, and the difference recorded, to the monitor setup OPLR value. The stack exit correlation error shall be determined as the absolute value of the difference between the measured value and the correct value, expressed as a percentage of the correct value. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:01:20AM EDT DIN: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA Page 12(F) A three-point calibration error test of the COMS shall be conducted. Three (3) neutral density filters

meeting the requirements of PS-1 shall be placed in the COMS light beam path. The monitor response shall be independently recorded from the COMS permanent data recorder. Make A total of five (5) nonconsecutive readings for each filter shall be made. The low-range, mid-range, and high-range calibration error results shall be computed as the mean difference and ninety-five percent (95%) confidence interval for the difference between the expected and the actual responses of the monitor as corrected to stack exit conditions. These values shall be calculated using the procedure of PS-1, Section 8.0. The following are requirements for these values: (i) The calibration error test requires the installation of an external calibration audit device (zero-jig). The zero-jig shall be adjusted to provide the same zero (0) response as the monitor's simulated zero (0). (ii) Use calibration attenuators, that is, neutral density filters or screens, with values that have been determined according to PS-1, Section 7.1.3, "Attenuator Calibration", and produce simulated opacities (as corrected to stack exit conditions) in the ranges listed in Table 1-2 in PS-1. (iii) The stability of the attenuator values shall be checked at least once per year according to the procedures specified in PS-1. The attenuators shall be recalibrated if the stability checks indicate a change of two percent (2%) opacity or greater. (4) The following are requirements for monitor acceptance criteria: (A) The following criteria are to be used for determining to determine if the COMS audit results are acceptable:

TABLE 1. PERFORMANCE AUDIT CRITERIA

Stack Exit Correlation Error < 2 percent Zero and Upscale Responses < 2 percent opacity Zero Compensation < 4 percent opacity Optical Alignment Misalignment error < 2 percent opacity Optical Surface Dust Accumulation < 4 percent opacity Calibration Error < 3 percent opacity (B) The COMS is out of control whenever the results of a quarterly performance audit indicate noncompliance with any of the performance assessment criteria of Table 1 in clause (A). If the COMS is out of control, the owner or operator must shall take the action necessary to eliminate the problem. Following corrective action, the source or emissions unit owner or operator must shall reconduct the appropriate failed portion of the audit and other applicable portions to determine whether the COMS is operating properly and within specifications. The COMS owner or operator shall record both audit results showing the COMS to be out of control and the results following corrective action. COMS data obtained during any out of control period may not be used for compliance determination; the data may be used for identifying periods where there has been a failure to meet quality assurance and control criteria. (C) Repeated audit failures, that is, out of control conditions resulting from revealed in the quarterly audits, indicate that the QC procedures are inadequate or the COMS is incapable of providing quality data. The

source or emissions unit owner or operator shall: (i) increase the frequency of the above QC procedures in this subsection until the performance criteria are maintained; or (ii) modify or replace the COMS whenever two (2) consecutive quarters of unacceptable performance

occur. (5) The performance audit calculations contained in PS-1, Section 8 shall be followed.

(d) Except where 40 CFR 75* is applicable for affected facilities emissions units under the acid rain program, quality control requirements for flow monitoring systems are as follows: (1) For CD assessment, the flow monitoring system shall be checked at least once daily. The CD shall be quantified and recorded at zero (0) (or low level) and upscale level. The flow monitoring systems shall be adjusted whenever the CD exceeds the specification of 40 CFR 60, Appendix B, Performance Specification 6 (PS-6)*, and the flow monitoring systems shall be declared out of control when the CD exceeds twice the specification of PS-6. Corrective actions, followed by a validating CD assessment, are required when the flow monitoring system is out of control. (2) An annual relative accuracy test.

(e) The owner or operator of a peaking unit, as defined in 326 IAC 3- 4- 1 (13), shall conduct a relative accuracy test audit (RATA) on any required CEMS as specified in 40 CFR 60, Appendix F* or as follows: (1) For each primary and redundant backup monitoring system and each sorbent trap monitoring system, RATAs shall be performed once every four (4) successive QA operating quarters. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:01:20AM EDT DIN: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA Page 13(2) A calendar quarter that does not qualify as a QA operating quarter shall be excluded in determining

the deadline for the next RATA. (3) Not more than eight (8) successive calendar quarters shall elapse after the quarter in which a RATA was last performed without a subsequent RATA having been conducted. (4) If a RATA has not been completed by the end of the eighth calendar quarter since the quarter of the last RATA, then the RATA must be completed within a seven hundred twenty (720) unit, or stack, operating hour grace period, as provided in 40 CFR 75, Appendix B, Section 2.3.3,* following the end of the eighth successive elapsed calendar quarter, or data from the CEMS will become invalid.

(e) (f) Reporting requirements for performance audits are as follows: (1) Owners or operators of facilities emissions units required to conduct: (A) cylinder gas audit; (B) relative accuracy test audit; or (C) continuous opacity monitor calibration error audit; on continuous emission monitors shall prepare a written report of the results of the performance audit for each calendar quarter, or for other periods required by the department. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports shall be submitted to the department within thirty (30) calendar days after the end of each quarter for cylinder gas audits and continuous opacity monitor calibration error audits and within forty-five (45) calendar days after the completion of the test for relative accuracy test audits. (2) The performance audit report shall contain the following information: (A) Plant and monitor information, including the following: (i) The plant name and address. (ii) The monitor brand or manufacturer's name, model, and serial number. (iii) The monitor span. (iv) The monitor location. for example, duct, boiler, unit, or stack designation. (B) Performance audit information, including the following: (i) The auditor's name. (ii) A copy of the audit standard's certification. for example, the vendor's Protocol 1 certification, or neutral density filter certification. (iii) All data used to calculate the audit results. (iv) The audit results and an indication if the monitor passed or failed the audit. If the performance audit results show the CEMS or COMS to be out of control, the CEMS or COMS owner or operator must shall report both the audit results showing the CEMS or COMS to be out of control and the results of the audit following corrective action showing the COMS to be operating within specification. (v) Any corrective actions performed as the result of a failed audit.

(f) If (g) Whenever a relative accuracy test audit of any continuous emission monitor listed in subsection (a) or (e) is performed, the department must be notified in accordance with the protocol requirements of 326 IAC 3- 6- 2 at least thirty-five (35) days prior to the audit.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 5- 5 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2069; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 34; filed Aug 11, 2011, 1:54 p.m.: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA )

SECTION 9. 326 IAC 3- 5- 6 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 5- 6 Record keeping requirements Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 6. (a) On and after the certification of a monitoring system, the owner or operator of a source or emissions unit subject to this rule shall maintain records, including raw data, of all monitoring data and Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:01:20AM EDT DIN: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA Page 14supporting information for a minimum of five (5) years from the date of any of the following:

(1) A monitoring sample. (2) A measurement. (3) A test. (4) A certification. (5) A report. (6) Any other activity required under this article.

(b) The records described in subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) All documentation relating to: (A) design, installation, and testing of all elements of the monitoring system; and (B) required corrective action or compliance plan activities. (2) All maintenance logs, calibration checks, and other required quality assurance activities. (3) All records of corrective and preventive action. (4) A log of plant operations, including emission unit or monitoring system downtime with the following information: (A) Date of facility emissions unit or monitoring system downtime. (B) Time of commencement and completion of each downtime. (C) Reason for each downtime. (D) Nature of system repairs and adjustments.

(c) The owner or operator of a source or emissions unit subject to this rule shall maintain the records required by this section at the source or at such other site, in a manner so that they may be inspected by and make them available to the department or the U.S. EPA if so requested or required. upon request. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 5- 6 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2071; filed Aug 11, 2011, 1:54 p.m.: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA )

SECTION 10. 326 IAC 3- 5- 7 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 5- 7 Reporting requirements Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 7. (a) The following reporting requirements apply to sources owner or operator of a source or emissions unit subject to this rule shall submit a monitoring report to the department in accordance with this section.

(b) The owner or operator shall submit the monitoring report in accordance with the following requirements: (1) The owner or operator of sources or emissions units subject to the requirements of section 1 of this rule shall report excess emissions no less frequently than quarterly. For sources required to report the owner or operator of a source or emissions unit for which quarterly such reports are required, the reports shall be: (A) submitted by the facility source or emissions unit owner or operator to the department; and (B) postmarked or delivered by other means no later than thirty (30) calendar days following the last day of the reporting period. (2) If a permit specifies or a rule requires more frequent reports, such the reports shall be: (A) submitted by the facility source or emissions unit owner or operator to the department; and (B) postmarked or delivered by other means no later than fifteen (15) calendar days after the end of each month. (3) Gaseous excess emissions data reports shall be reported using three (3) hour block periods ending at: (A) 03:00; (B) 06:00; (C) 09:00; (D) 12:00; (E) 15:00; (F) 18:00; Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:01:20AM EDT DIN: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA Page 15(G) 21:00; and

(H) 24:00; For facilities that unless the emissions unit must demonstrate compliance with hourly (one (1) hour), a different averaging period as specified by an applicable rule or permit condition, such as daily (twenty-four (24) hour) average or thirty (30) day averages. such information shall be submitted as part of the quarterly report required in this section.

(4) (c) The monitoring report shall contain the following continuous monitoring information summaries, with all times reported in real time: (A) (1) Monitored facility emission unit operation time during the reporting period. (B) (2) Excess emissions or parameters, as applicable, reported in units of the standard, or the applicable parameter unit as follows: (i) (A) Date of excess emissions, or other applicable dates. (ii) (B) Time of commencement and completion for each applicable parameter deviation or excess emission data. (C) (3) Magnitude of each excess emission as follows: (i) (A) For opacity as follows: (AA) (i) The actual percent opacity of all six (6) minute (block) averages exceeding the applicable opacity limit shall be reported. If the an exceedance occurs continuously beyond one (1) six (6) minute period, the percent opacity for each six (6) minute period or the highest six (6) minute average opacity for the entire period shall be reported. (BB) (ii) For department approved opacity averaging times other than six (6) minutes, the actual percent opacity of each averaging period in excess of the applicable limit shall be reported. (CC) (iii) A summary by cause shall be prepared and submitted as part of this report itemizing exceedances by cause. (ii) (B) For gaseous emissions, the excess emissions, in units of the applicable standard, must be reported based on the applicable averaging time, for example, one (1) hour block, three (3) hour block, three (3) hour rolling, in addition to any other reporting requirements that may be applicable. The averaging time is specified in the applicable federal or state rules, or facility in the operating permit for the emissions unit. (5) (4) Continuous monitoring system instrument downtime, except for zero (0) and span checks, which shall be reported separately, shall include the following: (A) Date of downtime. (B) Time of commencement. (C) Duration of each downtime. (D) Reasons for each downtime. (E) Nature of system repairs and adjustments.

(d) If there are no excess emissions or monitor downtime in a reporting period, the owner or operator of a emissions unit subject to this rule shall submit a report indicating that no excess emissions or downtime incidents occurred in the reporting period that includes the start and end dates of the time period. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 5- 7 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2071; filed Aug 11, 2011, 1:54 p.m.: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA )

SECTION 11. 326 IAC 3- 5- 8 IS ADDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 5- 8 Operation and maintenance of continuous emission monitoring and continuous opacity monitoring systems Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 8. (a) This section applies to the operation and maintenance of CEMS and COMS.

(b) The owner or operator of a CEMS or COMS required by federal or state regulations or permit shall: (1) install; (2) calibrate; Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:01:20AM EDT DIN: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA Page 16(3) maintain;

(4) operate; and (5) certify; such CEMS or COMS, and related equipment in accordance with applicable federal regulations, this rule, and any applicable permits.

(c) Except for periods when the: (1) affected emissions unit is not operating; (2) affected source or emissions unit is operating under a scenario that does not require CEMS or COMS; (3) the owner or operator is repairing the CEMS or COMS; (4) CEMS or COMS is experiencing a malfunction; or (5) owner/operator is conducting CEMS or COMS quality assurance and quality control activities, including, but not limited to: (A) calibration checks; (B) zero and span adjustments; (C) calibration gas audits; or (D) other required quality assurance/quality control activities; all CEMS and COMS shall be in continuous operation.

(d) Except as otherwise provided by a rule or provided specifically in a permit, if a CEMS or COMS is malfunctioning or will be down for calibration, maintenance, or repairs for a period of twenty-four (24) hours or more, the owner or operator of the CEMS or COMS shall perform supplemental monitoring in accordance with the permit.

(e) The owner or operator of the CEMS or COMS shall do the following: (1) Keep records: (A) in accordance with section 6(b) of this rule; and (B) that describe the supplemental monitoring implemented during any downtime to assure compliance with applicable emission limitations. (2) Submit reports, as applicable, in accordance with section 7 of this rule. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 5- 8 ; filed Aug 11, 2011, 1:54 p.m.: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA )

SECTION 12. 326 IAC 3- 6- 1 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 6- 1 Applicability; test procedures Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 1. This rule applies to any facility emissions unit emissions testing performed to determine compliance with applicable emission limitations contained in this title, or for any other purpose requiring review and approval by the department. (such as an alternate emission factor determination). The owner or operator of an emissions unit shall conduct emission tests subject to this rule shall be conducted in accordance with any applicable procedures and analysis methods specified in 40 CFR 51*, 40 CFR 60*, 40 CFR 61*, 40 CFR 63*, 40 CFR 75*, or other procedures approved by the department and U.S. EPA.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 6- 1 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2072; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 36; filed Aug 11, 2011, 1:54 p.m.: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA )

SECTION 13. 326 IAC 3- 6- 2 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:01:20AM EDT DIN: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA Page 17326 IAC 3- 6- 2 Source sampling protocols

Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 2. (a) When an emissions test is to be performed by any person other than the department, the source or emissions unit owner or operator shall complete a test protocol form and submit the test protocol form to the department not later than thirty-five (35) days prior to the intended test date unless more notice is required under the applicable program. Such rule requires additional notice. The test protocol shall: (1) be on a form approved by the department; or shall (2) contain information equivalent to that required on the form approved by the department. The department shall evaluate and approve the test protocol prior to it being implemented. If the department does not notify the owner or operator prior to the test date that the protocol has not been approved, the protocol is deemed approved.

(b) After evaluating the completed test protocol form, the department may: (1) inspect the test site; or (2) require additional conditions, including, but not limited to: (A) requiring reasonable modifications to the stack or duct to obtain acceptable test conditions; (B) requiring additional tests to allow for adverse conditions; such as interferences, nonsteady, or cyclic processes; (C) keeping process operating parameter records, operating logs, or charts during the test; (D) placing conditions on control equipment operation to make the operation of control equipment representative of normal operation; or (E) recording specified control equipment operating parameters during the test.

(c) If the department requires modification to: (1) test methods; (2) analytical methods; (3) operational parameters; or (4) other matters included in the emissions test protocol; the department shall notify the source or emissions unit owner or operator and the testing firm by letter or telephone not later than twenty-one (21) days prior to the test date.

(d) If the source or emissions unit owner or operator or test firm desires to make a change to previously submitted procedures or conditions, the department shall be notified of such the change as soon as practicable prior to the intended emissions test date. Such The changes shall not be made unless approved by the department prior to the emission test.

(e) Reasonable changes in the emissions test protocol that result from emergency conditions during the test shall be approved by the department if a department staff person is available at the test site, before the test may proceed.

(f) Post-test approval may be granted based on reasonable changes resulting from emergency or reasonably unforeseeable conditions during the test.

(g) The department reserves the right to conduct any portion of the reference method tests using equipment supplied by the department. Notice of acceptable test procedures shall be given to the owner or operator of the

source or emissions unit and its testing representative.

(h) The source or emissions unit owner or operator shall schedule an actual test date and time period and notify the department not later than fourteen (14) days prior to the actual test date. In the event that a previously scheduled test must be canceled and rescheduled, the owner or operator of the source or emissions unit shall notify the department no less than fourteen (14) days in advance of the rescheduled test date. Tests rescheduled for less than fourteen (14) days after notifying the department of the rescheduled test date must be approved by the department. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:01:20AM EDT DIN: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA Page 18(Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 6- 2 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2072; filed Aug 11, 2011, 1:54 p.m.: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA )

SECTION 14. 326 IAC 3- 6- 3 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 6- 3 Emission testing Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 3. (a) Department staff may observe field test procedures and source or emissions unit operation during the emission test.

(b) The owner or operator of a source or emissions unit shall conduct all emission tests shall be conducted as follows: (1) While The facility emissions unit being tested is shall be operating according to clause (A) or (B), except as allowed under clause (C), as follows: (A) At a minimum, ninety-five percent (95%) to one hundred percent (100%) of its the permitted maximum emissions unit operating capacity description. (B) Under conditions of worst case emissions, and if the worst case emission condition is not known, then the worst case emission condition shall be assumed to be the maximum process or operating rate of the emissions unit as listed in the permit's emissions unit description. (C) Under other capacities or conditions as specified in an applicable requirement or approved by the department. As used in this clause, "capacity" means the design capacity of the emissions unit or other operating capacities agreed to by the owner or operator of the emissions unit and the department, including, but not limited to, process conditions when the department believes that changes in the operating capacities or operating conditions have the potential to affect emission levels. (2) Under conditions representative of normal operations. (3) Under other capacities or conditions specified and approved by the department. As used in this subdivision, "capacity" means the design capacity of the facility or other operating capacities agreed to by the

source and the department. (2) All test runs for a given pollutant shall be conducted within forty-eight (48) hours unless process variables or mandatory test lengths of greater than two (2) hours make this impracticable. In these cases, the testing shall be conducted on consecutive days. Other periods or duration may be approved by the commissioner if specific testing circumstances require a longer testing time frame.

(c) Facilities Emissions units subject to 326 IAC 12

, New Source Performance Standards, 326 IAC 14
, or 326 IAC 20 Hazardous Air Pollutants, shall be tested under conditions as specified in the applicable provision for that facility emissions unit in 40 CFR 60*, 40 CFR 61*, or 40 CFR 63* and this rule where appropriate.

(d) The owner or operator of a source or emissions unit shall make available at the test site calibration results of the various sampling components. The information shall include the following: (1) The date or dates the test was performed. (2) The methods used. (3) The calibration data. (4) The results. All components requiring calibration shall be calibrated within sixty (60) days prior to the actual test date. Post-test calibrations shall be performed on the components not later than forty-five (45) days after the actual test date. Components requiring calibration are listed in the federal test methods specified in section 5 of this rule.

(e) The department may perform or require the performance of audits of equipment or procedures associated with the test series up to the time of the actual performance of the test, between test runs, or following the test series. The department reserves the right to perform or observe all associated analyses.

(f) The original or a photocopy of the raw field data generated during the test series shall be provided to the department observer upon request if such the request may be reasonably met under the existing circumstances. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:01:20AM EDT DIN: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA Page 19*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing

Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 6- 3; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2073; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 37; filed Aug 11, 2011, 1:54 p.m.: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA )

SECTION 15. 326 IAC 3- 6- 4 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 6- 4 Reporting Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 4. (a) All emission tests for which a test protocol form was submitted pursuant to the department under section 2 of this rule shall be reported to the department in the form of an emission test report containing the following information: (1) The reported testing methods and results certified as true and accurate and in compliance with this rule by the person responsible for conducting the emissions test. (2) Information regarding the test, including the following: (A) A stack test result summary table that compares the measured emissions, in units consistent with the applicable emissions limitations, to the emissions limitations. (A) (B) A description of the facility or facilities emissions unit or units being tested. (B) (C) The date or dates on which the test was performed. (C) (D) The type of tests conducted. (D) (E) The type of process and control equipment utilized. (E) (F) The source name and location. (F) (G) The purpose of the tests. (G) (H) The test participants and their titles. (3) Tabulated data and results, including the following: (A) The process weight rate or heat input rate. (B) The referenced or derived conversion factors. (C) The stack gas flow rate. (D) Measured emissions given in units consistent with the applicable emission limitations. (E) The average value of emissions from any continuous gaseous emissions monitoring system in units consistent with the applicable emission limitations if applicable to the pollutant being tested. (E) (F) If applicable, visible emissions observations or six (6) minute average continuous opacity monitor readings. (F) Average value of emissions from any continuous gaseous emissions monitoring system in units consistent with the applicable emission limitations if applicable to the pollutant being tested. (4) A description of process and control devices, including the following: (A) A process flow diagram. (B) The maximum design capacities. (C) A fuel analysis and heat value for heat input rate determinations. (D) The process and control equipment operating conditions. (E) A discussion of variations from normal plant operations. (F) The stack height. (G) The exit diameter. (H) The volumetric flow rate (cubic feet per minute). (I) The exit temperature. (J) The exit velocity. (5) A description of sampling methods used, including the following: (A) A brief discussion of the analytical procedures with justifications for any variance from reference method procedures. (B) Specification of the following: (i) The number of sampling points. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:01:20AM EDT DIN: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA Page 20(ii) The time per point.

(iii) The total sampling time per run. (C) A cross-sectional diagram of the sampling site showing sampling points. (D) A diagram showing the following: (i) The stack dimensions. (ii) The sampling location. (iii) The distance from the nearest flow disturbance upstream and downstream of the sampling points. (iv) The diagram of the sampling train. (6) Sampling and analytical procedures used, including the following: (A) Results and calculations, including the following: (i) Units consistent with the applicable emission limitation. (ii) One (1) complete calculation using actual data for each type of test performed. (iii) Raw production data signed by the source official. (iv) Photocopies of all actual field data. (B) A laboratory report, including the following: (i) The chain of custody. (ii) Copies of all calibration data for equipment used in sampling as described in section 3(d) of this rule. (C) Applicable rules and regulations showing the emission limitations. (D) For particulate matter tests, If applicable, copies of visible emissions evaluations or opacity monitor readings. (E) Copies of any continuous gaseous emissions monitoring system readings for gaseous pollutant tests.

(b) The owner or operator of a source or emissions unit shall submit all emission test reports must be received by to the department not later than forty-five (45) days after the completion of the testing. An extension may be granted by the department if the owner or operator of the source or emissions unit submits to the department a reasonable written explanation for the requested extension not later than five (5) days prior to the end of the initial forty-five (45) day period. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 6- 4 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2073; filed Aug 11, 2011, 1:54 p.m.: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA )

SECTION 16. 326 IAC 3- 6- 5 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 6- 5 Specific testing procedures; particulate matter; PM 10 ; PM 2.5 ; sulfur dioxide; nitrogen oxides; volatile organic compounds Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 5. (a) Tests for particulate matter tests (PM), PM 10 , and PM 2.5 shall be conducted in accordance with the following procedures: (1) For PM: 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 5*, 5A*, 5B*, 5C*, 5D*, 5E*, or 5F*, or Method 17*, as applicable, or other procedures approved by the department and U.S. EPA. (2) For PM 10 and PM 2.5 : 40 CFR 51, Appendix M, Method 201* or 201A*, and 202*. The measurement of condensable PM 10 using the procedures described in Method 202* is not required if the applicable emission limitation is contained at 326 IAC 6.8- 2 , unless otherwise specified by 326 IAC 6.5 or 326 IAC 6.8 . 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 5*, in conjunction with Method 202*, may also be used, subject to the approval of the department and U.S. EPA. Other procedures to measure PM 10 and PM 2.5 may be approved by the department and U.S. EPA. (2) (3) Visible emissions (VE) evaluations shall be performed in conjunction with a particulate emissions PM, PM 10 , PM 2.5 , or other mass emission rate test of air pollutants, as required by the department. The VE evaluations shall be conducted by a qualified observer in accordance with the procedures contained in 326 IAC 5- 1- 4 . VE readings shall be continuously recorded for at least thirty (30) minutes per hour of sampling time for each sampling repetition, unless a longer time is otherwise mandated by federal regulation. A waiver from this requirement may be granted by the on-site department staff person or on-site department staff person if adverse conditions exist that would invalidate the VE readings. Complete waivers from the requirement to conduct VE readings during a compliance test may not be granted to facilities for the emissions unit required to complete opacity testing pursuant to 40 CFR 60.8* Facilities or 40 CFR 63*. VE readings are not required for units when operating a certified PM CEMS. Emissions units equipped with Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:01:20AM EDT DIN: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA Page 21continuous opacity monitors may submit the six (6) minute integrated readings of such the monitors during the

sampling period, instead of performing VE evaluations, provided: (A) the monitoring system meets the performance specifications as specified in 40 CFR 60, Appendix B*, and is, or will be, certified by the department; and (B) the monitor readings submitted with the test include a zero (0) and upscale calibration check before the first test run and following the end of the final run; and (C) if more than one (1) day of testing is required to complete the three (3) runs, the zero (0) and span checks shall be performed at the beginning of each day's testing and at the conclusion of each day's final run. (3) (4) At least three (3) repetitions of the test shall be performed under consistent facility emissions unit operating conditions unless otherwise allowed by the department. For boiler emissions testing, at least one (1) of the three (3) repetitions shall be conducted during a normal sootblowing cycle that is consistent with frequency and duration normally experienced. (4) (5) At Richmond Power and Light's Whitewater Generating Station, when sootblowing occurs during one (1) of the three (3) repetitions, emission test results shall be evaluated using either a time weighted averaging period (TWAP) or a straight averaging technique. When using TWAP, the following equation shall be used to ensure proper weighting of an intermittent cleaning cycle performance test run regardless of the length of the cleaning cycle and regardless of the number and duration of the test runs made on the unit. When using TWAP, the representative pounds per hour of particulate emissions shall be calculated using the following equation:

Where: E = Pounds per hour of particulate emissions.

E
cc = Average E of sample containing cleaning cycle.

E
ncc = Average E of sample containing no cleaning cycle. A = Hours of cleaning cycle operation during sample. B = Hours with no cleaning cycle operation during sample. R = Average hours of operation per twenty-four (24) hours. S = Average hours of cleaning cycle operation per twenty-four (24) hours. (5) (6) Only those fuels representative of normal fuel quality used during normal operations shall be combusted. (6) (7) During each repetition, each sampling point shall be sampled for a minimum of two (2) minutes. (7) (8) The total test time per repetition shall be no less than sixty (60) minutes. (8) (9) The total sample volume per repetition shall be no less than thirty (30) dry standard cubic feet (dscf). (9) (10) The total particulate weight collected from the sampling nozzle, probe, cyclone (if used), filter holder (front half), filter, and connecting glassware, and, if required in subdivision (2), the impinger catch, shall be reported to the department. Particulate analysis of the impinger catch is not required, unless specified by the department.

(b) The owner or operator shall conduct sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) tests shall be conducted in accordance with the following procedures: (1) 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6*, 6A*, or 6C*, or 8*, as applicable, or other procedures approved by the department and U.S. EPA. (2) At least three (3) repetitions of two (2) samples, each according to 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6* or 6A*, or 6C*, or three (3) repetitions according to 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6C* or 8*, performed under identical facility emissions unit operating conditions, shall constitute a test. For boiler emissions testing, only those fuels representative of fuel quality during normal operations shall be combusted. (3) During each of the repetitions for 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 8*, each sampling point shall be sampled for a minimum of two (2) minutes. (4) (3) The total test time per repetition shall be as follows: (A) For tests using 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6* or 6A*, or 6C*, a minimum of twenty (20) minutes per run with a thirty (30) minute interval between each run. (B) For tests using 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6C*, a minimum of sixty (60) minutes per run. (B) (C) For tests using 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 8*, a minimum of sixty (60) minutes per run, with the following criteria: (i) During each of the repetitions, each sampling point shall be sampled for a minimum of two (2) Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:01:20AM EDT DIN: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA Page 22minutes.

(5) (ii) The total sample volume per repetition under 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 8*, shall be no less than forty (40) dry standard cubic feet (dscf). (iii) During each of the repetitions, the sample rate shall not exceed one (1) cubic foot per minute (cfm).

(c) The owner or operator shall conduct nitrogen oxide (NO

x ) tests shall be conducted according to the following procedures: (1) 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 7*, 7A*, 7B*, 7C*, or 7E*, as applicable, or other procedures approved by the department and U.S. EPA. (2) For Methods 7*, 7A*, 7B*, or 7C*, at least three (3) repetitions of four (4) samples each shall constitute a test. (3) For Method 7E*, three (3) test runs, each a minimum of sixty (60) minutes, shall constitute a test.

(d) The owner or operator shall conduct volatile organic compounds (VOC) emissions tests shall be conducted in accordance with the following procedures: (1) 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 25*, or other procedures approved by the department and U.S. EPA, shall be used for the total nonmethane organic emissions. (2) At least three (3) samples shall be collected and analyzed. (3) The total test time per repetition shall be a minimum of sixty (60) minutes. (4) Bulk gasoline terminals subject to 326 IAC 20- 10 shall be tested in accordance with 40 CFR 63, Subpart R*. All other bulk gasoline terminals shall be tested in accordance with the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) at 40 CFR 60, Subpart XX*. During all compliance tests, 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 21* shall be used for determining whether there are any leaks from the hatches or flanges of the gasoline transports. If any leak is detected, the transport shall not be used for the capacity of the compliance test of the bulk gasoline terminal. The threshold for leaks shall be as follows: (A) Five hundred (500) parts per million methane for all bulk gasoline terminals subject to 40 CFR 63, Subpart R*. (B) Ten thousand (10,000) parts per million (as methane) for all bulk gasoline terminals subject to 40 CFR 60, Subpart XX* and for all other bulk gasoline terminals.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 6- 5 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2074; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 37; filed Aug 11, 2011, 1:54 p.m.: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA )

SECTION 17. 326 IAC 3- 7- 1 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 7- 1 Applicability Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 1. This rule applies to fuel sampling and analysis that is performed to determine compliance with the emission limitations specified in 326 IAC 7

. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 7- 1 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2075; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477; filed Aug 11, 2011, 1:54 p.m.: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA )

SECTION 18. 326 IAC 3- 7- 2 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 7- 2 Coal sampling and analysis methods Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:01:20AM EDT DIN: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA Page 23Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 2. (a) Owners or operators of coal sampling systems for sources with total coal-fired capacity greater than or equal to one thousand five hundred (1,500) million British thermal units (Btus) (Btu) per hour actual heat input shall follow procedures specified in ASTM D2234-89*, "Standard Methods for Collection of a Gross Sample of Coal", unless otherwise provided in section 3 of this rule. Additionally, the coal sampling system shall meet the following requirements: (1) The coal sample acquisition point shall be at a location where representative samples of the total coal flow to be combusted by the facility or facilities emissions unit may be obtained. A single as-bunkered sampling station may be used to represent the coal to be combusted by multiple facilities emissions units using the same stockpile feed system. (2) The increment collection method to be used is specified in ASTM D2234-89*, Table 1, I-A-1, I-B-1, or I-C-1. (3) The opening of the sampling device shall be at least two and one-half (2.5) times the top-size of the coal and not less than one and one-fourth (1.25) inches. (4) The sampling device shall have sufficient capacity to completely retain or entirely pass the increment without loss or spillage. (5) The velocity with which the cross-stream cutting instrument travels through the stream shall not exceed eighteen (18) inches per second. The velocity requirement shall not apply to a swing-arm sampler or to a sampler whose cutter opening is perpendicular to the stream of coal. Owners or operators of all coal sampling systems shall detail the proper operating procedures in the standard operating procedures document required under section 5 of this rule. (6) Increments obtained during the sampling period shall be protected from changes in composition to maintain the integrity of constituent characteristics required to convert sample sulfur content to units of the applicable emission standard. (7) A comparison of weight or volume of collected sample with that of the total flow of coal shall be conducted at a minimum of one (1) time every two (2) weeks to assure a constant sampling ratio is maintained for increments composited into a sample representing a single twenty-four (24) hour period. (8) A routine inspection of the sampling system shall be established to meet requirements and guidelines specified in ASTM D4702-87*, "Guide for Inspecting Mechanical Coal Sampling Systems that Use Cross-Cut Sample Cutters for Conformance with Current ASTM Methods". (9) Composite samples shall be collected for analysis at a minimum of one (1) time per twenty-four (24) hour period.

(b) Owners or operators of coal sampling systems for sources with total coal-fired capacity between one hundred (100) and one thousand five hundred (1,500) million Btus Btu per hour actual heat input shall comply with requirements: specified as follows: (1) in subsection (a); (2) in section 3 of this rule; or (3) shall meet the following minimum requirements: (A) The coal sample acquisition point shall be at a location where representative samples of the total coal flow to be combusted by the facility or facilities emissions unit may be obtained. A single as-bunkered or as-burned sampling station may be used to represent the coal to be combusted by multiple facilities emissions units using the same stockpile feed system. (B) Coal shall be sampled at least three (3) times per day and at least one (1) time per eight (8) hour period unless no coal is bunkered during the preceding eight (8) hour period. (C) Minimum sample size shall be five hundred (500) grams. (D) Samples shall be composited and analyzed at the end of each calendar month.

(c) Coal samples shall be prepared for analysis in accordance with procedures specified in ASTM D2013-86*, "Standard Method of Preparing Coal Samples for Analysis". The preparation of samples shall meet the following requirements: (1) Samples shall be prepared in accordance with ASTM D2013-86*, Procedure A or Procedure B. (2) Sample preparation shall be checked at weekly intervals by performing a split sample of the twenty-four (24) hour composite sample and preparing and analyzing these two (2) identically.

(d) The heat content of coal samples shall be determined in accordance with procedures specified in ASTM D2015-95*, "Standard Test Method for Gross Calorific Value of Solid Fuel by the Adiabatic Bomb Calorimeter", or Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:01:20AM EDT DIN: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA Page 24ASTM D3286-91A*, "Standard Test Method for Gross Calorific Value of Coal and Coke by the Isothermal Jacket

Bomb Calorimeter". Restandardization requirements in Section 11 of both methods shall be followed. Precision requirements for repeatability shall be verified according to Section 16.1.1 of both methods at a minimum of once per week.

(e) The sulfur content of coal samples shall be determined according to procedures specified in ASTM D3177-89*, "Standard Test Methods for Total Sulfur in the Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke", or ASTM D4239-94*, "Standard Test Methods for Sulfur in the Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke Using High Temperature Tube Furnace Combustion Methods". Precision requirements for repeatability shall be verified according to ASTM D3177-89*, Section 13, or ASTM D4239-94, Section 18*, at a minimum of one (1) time per week. The laboratory that performs the analysis shall participate in an interlaboratory audit program using coal samples supplied by the department.

(f) Compliance with this section is required unless a source owner or operator demonstrates to The department that may approve minor modifications to the coal sampling and analysis procedures at a source upon demonstration by the source owner or operator that the minor modifications are necessary to meet the requirements of this section.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 7- 2 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2075; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 38; filed Aug 11, 2011, 1:54 p.m.: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA )

SECTION 19. 326 IAC 3- 7- 3 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 7- 3 Alternative coal sampling and analysis methods Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 3. (a) As an alternative to the coal sampling and analysis procedures in section 2 of this rule, a source owner or operator may use manual or other non-ASTM automatic sampling and analysis procedures upon a demonstration as described in subsection (b), submitted to and approved by the department for approval, and U.S. EPA that such the procedures provide sulfur dioxide emission estimates representative either of estimates based on coal sampling and analysis procedures specified in section 2 of this rule or of continuous emissions monitoring. The demonstration shall consist of one (1) or more of the following methods:

(1) (b) For the demonstration described in this section, a source owner or operator may submit documentation of procedures and results of a stopped-belt bias test or other comparisons between a sampling system meeting the requirements of section 2 of this rule and those methods and procedures proposed by the source owner or operator. A stopped-belt bias test and a sampling system meeting the requirements of section 2 of this rule shall be considered reference method systems. A comparison shall utilize a series of at least twenty-five (25) reference method system samples paired with nonreference method system samples and analyzed for the percent of sulfur content to determine the presence of significant systemic error. The detection of significant systemic error shall be based on the application of a statistical test (t-test) to determine if there is a difference between the reference and nonreference systems at the ninety-five percent (95%) confidence level, according to the following formula:

Where: t = Calculated t value.

d = Average difference between paired data. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:01:20AM EDT DIN: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA Page 25Sd = Standard deviation of the differences. N = Number of paired data sets. The calculated t value is compared to the t value in the standard statistical t tables at the ninety-five percent (95%) probability and the appropriate degrees of freedom (n - 1). If the calculated t value is greater than or equal to the value of t in the t table, then the systems are not comparable. Certain coals with low variability may detect a small bias, which may be acceptable as decided on a case-by-case basis. This method tests for positive and negative bias. Provisions for testing only for a negative bias that would cause a source owner or operator to report less than actual values may be acceptable if supported by statistical tests. Upon request, the department shall provide written guidance to a source owner or operator as to the procedures to be followed in conducting this comparison. (2) Other procedures may be acceptable if submitted to the department for approval and the department approves.

(b) (c) The demonstration provided described in subsection (a) this section shall be repeated upon any significant change to the coal sampling procedures or upon notification by the department that a new demonstration is necessary. If the department has reason to doubt that the alternative sampling and analysis procedures are comparable to methods and procedures provided in section 2 of this rule, based on: (1) inspections; (2) monitoring; (3) quality assurance data; or (4) other information; the department may notify the owner or operator that the demonstration shall be repeated. Written notification by the department of the request shall be made to the source owner or operator allowing at least sixty (60) days to schedule the demonstration. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 7- 3; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2077; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477; filed Aug 11, 2011, 1:54 p.m.: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA )

SECTION 20. 326 IAC 3- 7- 4 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 7- 4 Fuel oil sampling; analysis methods Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 4. (a) The source owner or operator shall perform sampling and analysis of the sulfur content of fuel oil shall be performed in accordance with the following ASTM procedures: (1) Collection of fuel oil samples shall be conducted according to either of the following: (A) ASTM D4057-88*, "Standard Practice for Manual Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum Products". (B) ASTM D4177-82*, "Standard Method for Automatic Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum Products". (2) Determination of sulfur content shall be conducted according to any of the following: (A) ASTM D129-95*, "Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Products (General Bomb Method)". (B) ASTM D1266-91*, "Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Products (Lamp Method)". (C) ASTM D1552-95*, "Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Products (High-Temperature Method)". (D) ASTM D2622-94*, "Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Products (X-Ray Spectrographic Method)". (3) Determination of heat content shall be conducted according to ASTM D240-92*, "Standard Test Method for Heat of Combustion of Liquid Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb Calorimeter".

(b) An A source owner or operator may, with the prior written approval of the department and U.S. EPA, modify the procedures specified in subsection (a), use alternate equivalent procedures, or rely upon equivalent sampling and analysis procedures performed by the vendor prior to delivery of the fuel oil to the owner or operator.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 7- 4 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2077; readopted filed Jan 10, Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:01:20AM EDT DIN: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA Page 262001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28

IR 40; filed Aug 11, 2011, 1:54 p.m.: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA )

SECTION 21. 326 IAC 3- 7- 5 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 7- 5 Record keeping requirements; standard operating procedures Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 5. (a) Owners or operators of sources with total coal-fired capacity greater than or equal to one hundred (100) million British thermal units per hour actual heat input shall develop a standard operating procedure (SOP) to be followed for: (1) sampling; (2) handling; (3) analysis; (4) quality control; (5) quality assurance; and (6) data reporting of the information collected pursuant to under sections 2 through 4 of this rule. In addition, any revision to the SOP shall be submitted to maintained by the source and made available upon request by the department.

(b) Owner or operators of emissions units using CEMS for compliance that do not use coal sampling and analysis as a backup when the CEMS is not in use do not need to have a SOP.

(b) (c) The owner or operator of a source or emissions unit subject to this rule shall maintain records sufficient to verify compliance with the procedures specified in sections 2 through 4 of this rule. Records shall be: (1) maintained for a period of five (5) years; and shall be (2) made available upon request by the department. The department may at any time perform a systems audit to determine compliance with the requirements in sections 2 through 4 of this rule. Audit procedures shall be submitted to the owner or operator of a fuel sampling and analysis system subject to audit prior to conducting such the audit. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 7- 5 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2078; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477; filed Aug 11, 2011, 1:54 p.m.: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA )

SECTION 22. 326 IAC 7- 2- 1 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 7- 2- 1 Reporting requirements; methods to determine compliance Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 1. (a) As used in this article, "weighting factor" means the daily quantity of coal bunkered or megawatt generation or other appropriate measure of the output of a combustion source.

(b) As used in this article, "rolling weighted average sulfur dioxide emission rate" means the summation of the average sulfur dioxide emission rate times the daily weighting factor divided by the summation of the weighting factors.

(c) Owners or operators of sources or emissions units subject to 326 IAC 7- 1.1

, 326 IAC 7- 4 , or 326 IAC 7- 4.1 shall submit to the commissioner the following reports based on fuel sampling and analysis data obtained in accordance with procedures specified under 326 IAC 3- 7: (1) Fuel combustion sources with total coal-fired heat input capacity greater than or equal to one thousand five hundred (1,500) million British thermal units (MMBtu) per hour shall submit quarterly reports of the thirty (30) day rolling weighted average sulfur dioxide emission rate in pounds per MMBtu. Records of the daily average Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:01:20AM EDT DIN: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA Page 27coal sulfur content, coal heat content, weighting factor, and daily average sulfur dioxide emission rate in

pounds per MMBtu shall be submitted to the department in the quarterly report and maintained by the source owner or operator for a period of at least two (2) years. (2) Fuel combustion sources with total coal-fired heat input capacity greater than one hundred (100) and less than one thousand five hundred (1,500) MMBtu per hour shall submit quarterly reports of the calendar month average coal sulfur content, coal heat content, and sulfur dioxide emission rate in pounds per MMBtu and the total monthly coal consumption. (3) All other fuel combustion sources shall submit reports of calendar month average sulfur content, heat content, fuel consumption, and sulfur dioxide emission rate in pounds per MMBtu upon request.

(d) Compliance or noncompliance with the emission limitations contained in 326 IAC 7- 1.1

, 326 IAC 7- 4

, or 326 IAC 7- 4.1 may be determined by a stack test conducted in accordance with 326 IAC 3- 6 utilizing procedures outlined in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6*, 6A*, 6C*, or 8*.

(e) (d) Fuel sampling and analysis data shall be collected pursuant to the procedures specified in 326 IAC 3- 7- 2 or 326 IAC 3- 7- 3 for coal combustion or 326 IAC 3- 7- 4 for oil combustion. and these data may be used to determine compliance or noncompliance with the emission limitations contained in 326 IAC 7- 1.1

, 326 IAC 7- 4

, or 326 IAC 7- 4.1 . Computation of calculated sulfur dioxide emission rates from fuel sampling and analysis data shall be based on the emission factors contained in U.S. EPA publication AP-42* unless other emission factors based on site-specific sulfur dioxide measurements are approved by the commissioner and the U.S. EPA. Fuel sampling and analysis data shall be collected as follows: (1) For coal-fired fuel combustion sources with heat input capacity greater than or equal to one thousand five hundred (1,500) MMBtu per hour, compliance or noncompliance shall be determined using a thirty (30) day rolling weighted average sulfur dioxide emission rate in pounds per MMBtu unless a shorter averaging time or alternate averaging methodology is specified for a source under this article. (2) For all other combustion sources, compliance or noncompliance shall be determined using a calendar month average sulfur dioxide emission rate in pounds per MMBtu unless a shorter averaging time or alternate averaging methodology is specified for a source under this article.

(f) A determination of noncompliance under either the method specified in subsection (d) or (e) shall not be refuted by evidence of compliance under the other method.

(g) Upon written notification of an emissions unit owner or operator to the department, (e) Subsection (c) does not apply when continuous emission monitoring data collected and reported under 326 IAC 3- 5 may be is used as the means for determining compliance with the emission limitations in this article. Upon such notification, the other requirements of this rule shall not apply.

(f) Compliance or noncompliance with the emission limitations contained in 326 IAC 7- 1.1 or 326 IAC 7- 4 may be determined by an appropriate method as follows: (1) A stack test conducted in accordance with 326 IAC 3- 6 using procedures in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6*, 6A*, 6C*, or 8*. (2) A continuous emission monitoring system in accordance with 326 IAC 3- 5

. (3) Source sampling in accordance with 326 IAC 3- 6

. (4) Fuel sampling and analysis data collected in accordance with subsection (d) or 326 IAC 3- 7

. (5) Other methods approved by the commissioner and U.S. EPA.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 7- 2- 1 ; filed Aug 28, 1990, 4:50 p.m.: 14 IR 52; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2078; errata filed Feb 9, 1999, 4:06 p.m.: 22 IR 2006; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477; errata filed Nov 7, 2001, 3:00 p.m.: 25 IR 813; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:30 p.m.: 26 IR 1565; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 42; filed May 25, 2005, 10:50 a.m.: 28 IR 2953; filed Aug 11, 2011, 1:54 p.m.: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA )

LSA Document #05-330(F) Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:01:20AM EDT DIN: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA Page 28Proposed Rule: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA

Hearing Held: May 4, 2011 Approved by Attorney General: July 21, 2011 Approved by Governor: August 10, 2011 Filed with Publisher: August 11, 2011, 1:54 p.m. Documents Incorporated by Reference: None Received by Publisher Small Business Regulatory Coordinator: Alison Beumer, IDEM Compliance and Technical Assistance Program - OPPTA, MC 60-04 IGCS W041, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251, (317) 232-8172 or (800) 988-7901, ctap@idem.in.gov Small Business Assistance Program Ombudsman: Brad Baughn, IDEM Small Business Assistance Program Ombudsman, MC 50-01 IGCN 1307, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251, (317) 234-3386, bbaughn@idem.in.gov

Posted: 09/07/2011 by Legislative Services Agency An html version of this document. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:01:20AM EDT DIN: 20110907-IR-326050330FRA Page 29

# A PPENDIX 

# B

# Rule Signature Page

Rule: Agency: 

### Subject: 

### LSA #05-330(F)
Air Pollution Control Board Compliance Monitoring Rule

## ADOPT~E: By: 

### Ja 

# l\1i11e;,Ji

Chairman Air Pollution Control Board

APPROVED: 

## ,

By:

# /1-1~~~· Mitchell E. Daniels, 

### Jr. Govemor, "State oflndiana

ACCEPTED FOR FILING:



### By: TITLE 326 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

LSA Document #D5-330(FR)

Filed with Publisher: August II. 2011. 1:54 p.m. By: Rlw 

### Date:

Date: 

# 8/tD/u

Date:

________ _

# A PPENDIX 

# CTITLE 326 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

SECOND NOTICE OF COMMENT PERIOD

LSA Document #05-330

DEVELOPMENT OF AMENDMENTS TO RULES CONCERNING COMPLIANCE MONITORING

PURPOSE OF NOTICE The Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) has developed draft rule language for amendments to 326 IAC 3 concerning compliance monitoring and 326 IAC 7- 2 concerning sulfur dioxide compliance requirements. By this notice, IDEM is soliciting public comment on the draft rule language. IDEM seeks comment on the affected citations listed and any other provisions of Title 326 that may be affected by this rulemaking.

HISTORY First Notice of Comment Period: December 1, 2005, Indiana Register (29 IR 899).

CITATIONS AFFECTED: 326 IAC 3 ; 326 IAC 7- 2

.

AUTHORITY: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11

.

SUBJECT MATTER AND BASIC PURPOSE OF RULEMAKING Basic Purpose and Background The purpose of this rulemaking is to correct deficiencies identified by U.S. EPA to obtain federal approval of these rules into the state implementation plan, to address certain testing requirements for peaking units, and to make various corrections and clarifications identified by IDEM staff. IDEM is also soliciting comments specific to 326 IAC 3 where other opportunities may exist to consider alternative compliance strategies. This rulemaking addresses deficiencies in the monitoring rules at 326 IAC 3 identified by U.S. EPA (February 8, 1994, 59 FR 5742). U.S. EPA found that language providing "Commissioner's discretion", in some cases, would allow the Commissioner to remove or modify federally enforceable requirements. IDEM is amending this language to ensure that when the Commissioner exercises discretion to modify or remove federally enforceable requirements, the exercise of this discretion is accompanied by U.S. EPA approval as a revision to the state implementation plan (SIP). IDEM proposes a change to monitoring requirements that affect peaking units subject to the acid rain provisions of 40 CFR 75. Peaking units that must operate a continuous emission monitoring system (CEMS) to comply with 40 CFR 60 or 326 IAC 3- 5 are currently required to perform an annual relative accuracy test as well as quarterly quality assurance functions pursuant to these rules. Because peaking units are not always operating, a requirement that they be started only to conduct these quality assurance functions is unnecessary. IDEM proposes to amend 326 IAC 3- 5 to allow these peaking units to comply with the Continuous Emission Monitoring provisions in 40 CFR 75 instead of those under the New Source Performance Standards in 40 CFR 60. IDEM has also added a new provision at 326 IAC 3- 5- 1 (c)(2)(A)(iv) that would allow the use of a CEMS for measuring particulate matter rather than a continuous opacity monitoring system (COMS) if certain criteria are met and it is approved by IDEM. IDEM has identified technical corrections and clarifications that are needed in existing rules in 326 IAC 3 and 326 IAC 7 concerning emissions monitoring requirements. IDEM proposes the following: • Clarification of data availability requirements concerning CEMS. • Corrections to 326 IAC 3- 6 to include references to source sampling procedures conducted under 40 CFR 61. • Clarification of requirements in 326 IAC 3- 6- 5 for source testing to demonstrate compliance with the limit on particulate matter having aerodynamic diameters less than ten microns in diameter (PM 10 ). • Deletion of 326 IAC 7- 2- 1 (f) because it does not adequately address the problem of conflicting test results to demonstrate compliance, and the issue is now addressed by the credible evidence rule in 326 IAC 1- 1- 6

. • Addition of particulate matter (PM) to the list of pollutants in 326 IAC 3- 5- 2 (2)(B) and 326 IAC 3- 5- 5 (a). • Amendments to 326 IAC 3- 5- 2 (7) to allow U.S. EPA the authority to request monitoring system evaluation. • Deletion of language allowing COMS data obtained in out of control periods to be used in compliance determination in 326 IAC 3- 5- 5 (c)(4)(B). • Deletion of language requiring written notification by the source to use CEMS data for compliance in 326 IAC 7- 2- 1 (g). • Other corrections or clarifications that may be identified during the course of this rulemaking. IDEM seeks comment on the affected citations listed and any other provisions related to the subject matter of this notice. More specifically, IDEM is seeking comment on opportunities for including provisions encouraging the Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 1use of new and emerging emission monitoring equipment, alternative compliance monitoring strategies and

frequencies commensurate with the level of environmental performance. IC 13- 14- 9- 4 Identification of Restrictions and Requirements Not Imposed Under Federal Law No element of the draft rule imposes either a restriction or a requirement on persons to whom the draft rule applies that is not imposed under federal law. Potential Fiscal Impact Currently, peaking units must comply with certain testing requirements that mean the units may have to be started up for the sole purpose of conducting the test. By allowing these units to use alternate testing requirements, the company could save the cost associated with starting up and running equipment, conducting tests, and submitting reports at times when the plant would not normally be in operation. This could result in an estimated savings of $4,000 to $5,000 for an annual relative accuracy test and an estimated savings of $500 to $1,000 per source for the quarterly quality assurance audits. Corrections to address deficiencies identified by U.S. EPA and other corrections and clarifications will have a negligible fiscal impact because these amendments will not substantively change existing requirements. IDEM invites comment on any potential fiscal impacts of this rulemaking. Public Participation and Workgroup Information A list of interested parties has been compiled based on interest shown in the previous notices on this subject and those who attended a public meeting on March 15, 2007, to discuss the rulemaking. Additional meetings may be held to discuss issues involved in this rulemaking. If you wish to attend meetings, provide comments to the workgroup on the rulemaking, or have suggestions related to the workgroup process, please contact Susan Bem, Rule and State Implementation Plan (SIP) Development Section, Office of Air Quality at (317) 233-5697 or (800) 451-6027 (in Indiana). Please provide your name, phone number, and e-mail address, if applicable, where you can be contacted. The public is also encouraged to submit comments and questions to members of the workgroup who represent their particular interests in the rulemaking.

SUMMARY/RESPONSE TO COMMENTS FROM THE FIRST COMMENT PERIOD IDEM requested public comment from December 1, 2005, through January 2, 2006, on alternative ways to achieve the purpose of the rule and suggestions for the development of draft rule language. IDEM received comments from the following parties by the comment period deadline: ALCOA Inc., Warrick Operations (ALC) Barnes & Thornburg LLP, on behalf of PSEG Lawrenceburg LLC (PSEG) Eli Lilly and Company (ELC) Indiana Manufacturers Association (IMA) Purdue University (PUR) Following is a summary of the comments received and IDEM's responses thereto: General Comments Comment: As monitoring requirements continue to evolve at both the federal and state level, Lilly encourages IDEM to focus on consistency of requirements and strive to reduce the degree of complexity associated with continuous monitoring. Lilly believes that state programs should incorporate federal monitoring requirements wherever possible with minimal or no changes. Lilly strongly believes Indiana's compliance monitoring requirements must represent a balance between protecting air quality, assuring compliance, providing clarity, and reducing administrative burdens. (ELC) (IMA) Comment: IMA believes that Indiana's rules for compliance monitoring, in particular the rules for continuous emissions monitoring systems, should be consistent with federal monitoring requirements. IDEM should adopt provisions in its rules that assure a source is not in violation of the rules when a monitoring system is not collecting valid data due to quality assurance and maintenance activities, or due to malfunctions. The federal monitoring rules provide exclusions of this nature and it is imperative that Indiana's rules are consistent on this matter. (IMA) Response: The monitoring requirements in 326 IAC 3 establish the monitoring requirements for both state and federal programs. IDEM recognizes the need to provide consistency and clarity in the rules. However, monitoring requirements applicable to a source or emissions unit in the federal rules such as the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs), and the Continuous Emission Monitoring requirements for Acid Rain may differ. IDEM considers the monitor operations such as daily zero, span checks, and other quality assurance functions to be a part of the necessary quality assurance/quality controls needed to operate and maintain an effective monitoring system. These activities are not considered deviations of an applicable standard. The daily zero and span checks are not used in calculating the percent monitor data availability. Additionally, IDEM does not consider monitor downtime resulting from maintenance or malfunctions of the monitor as violations of an applicable emission standard. CEMS Malfunctions Reporting Comment: The proposed reinstatement of reporting of malfunctions of continuous monitoring equipment will be an increased burden. IDEM should provide information about how this reporting will be used by IDEM staff. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 2How has IDEM been hampered by not having these reports sooner than a quarterly excess emissions and

CEM/COM downtime report? The obligation to operate the continuous monitoring system lies with the source owner/operator, so reporting a malfunction to IDEM prior to the quarterly report is not anticipated to result in the monitoring system malfunction being remedied any sooner than it would have been without the reporting requirement. (PUR) Comment: We believe that immediate reporting of monitoring system malfunctions should not be required. Sources already report monitoring system malfunctions in their quarterly or semi-annual compliance reports, and we believe any additional reporting would be redundant and excessive. Monitoring system malfunctions do not have the same potential for air quality concerns as a control device malfunction, and therefore, this type of equipment malfunction does not warrant immediate notification to IDEM. (IMA) Comment: Lilly believes that immediate reporting of continuous monitoring system malfunctions would be redundant, and therefore impose unnecessary costs on regulated sources. 326 IAC 3- 5- 7 (c)(5) already requires reporting of continuous monitoring system instrument downtime as part of the quarterly excess emission report. Malfunctions that affect the ability of the CEMS to collect required data should be reported as downtime in these reports. Lilly recommends that as an alternative to adding a separate reporting requirement, IDEM amend 326 IAC 3- 5- 7 (c)(5) to clarify that "downtime" includes malfunctions that affect the ability of the CEMS to collect required emissions data. This alternative would lessen the burden on both IDEM and regulated sources while allowing IDEM to receive the same information regarding continuous emission monitoring system performance. Unlike emission control equipment malfunctions, which are arguably more related to potential public health issues, a monitoring system failure does not create a sense of urgency for IDEM or the public. IDEM is not likely to respond to reports of CEMS malfunctions with a site-visit, and a malfunction of emissions monitoring equipment does not have a direct adverse impact on air quality. Thus, the additional administrative burden of immediate reporting for the regulated community is without a clear benefit. (ELC) (IMA) Response: Upon consideration of the comments and further discussion, IDEM concurs and has not included draft rule language in the second notice that would require immediate reporting of malfunctions since they would be reported on the quarterly report. Comment: IDEM should modify the definition of "monitoring system malfunction" found in 326 IAC 3- 4- 1 (8) in order to make it more consistent with the definitions of "malfunctions" found in the federal rules, specifically 40 CFR 60.2 and 40 CFR 63.2. (ELC) (IMA) Response: IDEM is proposing to delete the definition of "monitoring system malfunction" found in 326 IAC 3- 4- 1 (8) and add a definition of "malfunction" at 326 IAC 3- 4- 1 (13) in the draft language that is similar to the definition in 40 CFR 60.2 and 40 CFR 63.2. Since the term "monitoring system malfunction" is not used anywhere in Article 3 the definition of "malfunction" was added with reference to continuous monitoring equipment since the definition of "malfunction" in 40 CFR 60.2, 40 CFR 63.2, and 326 IAC 1- 2- 39 does not specifically refer to monitoring equipment. Comment: IDEM should reconfigure its monitor downtime reporting to require only a summary of downtime, rather than details of each event, for monitoring systems with good performance. This approach would be consistent with the reporting requirements found in the MACT General Provisions at 40 CFR 63.10(e)(3)(vii) and (viii). (ELC) (IMA) Response: Simply reporting the summary of downtime instead of the details of each event would prevent IDEM from determining the nature of the problems causing the downtime and would limit IDEM's ability to determine if specific actions are needed to correct a recurring problem. For example, a force majeure event may be viewed much differently than a monitoring system which continues to go off-line due to a failure to perform the required upkeep and maintenance. In cases where down time is caused by a reoccurring problem that should be addressed, failure to report on the nature of the downtime prevents IDEM from initiating the appropriate response. Downtime occurrences that may be preventable with some degree of intervention could not be identified if details of each event were not given. CEMS Data Availability Requirements Comment: Lilly agrees that additional clarification regarding CEMS data availability requirements is very important. Systems for collecting and recording compliance monitoring data are not capable of accurate measurements of compliance-related data 100% of the time no matter how hard a company strives to achieve that goal. Indiana's compliance monitoring rules must recognize this fact and provide clear guidelines for when a source fails to measure, collect, or record compliance-related data. These rules must also take into account that failure to measure, collect, or record data is not an indicator that the source has violated its emission limits and other direct compliance obligations. In general, Lilly believes the rules should allow for no data collection whenever the source is undertaking an activity that is for the benefit of the monitoring system (i.e., quality assurance and maintenance), or when the monitor is not working due to unplanned events beyond the reasonable control of the source. Therefore, Lilly recommends that the state rules defer to the data availability requirements in the underlying federal rules which provide allowances for sources to miss data collection for quality assurance and maintenance activities, and for monitor malfunctions. For those circumstances where no underlying federal rule exists, the state Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 3data availability requirements should maintain consistency with other federal programs by providing allowances

for downtime due to equipment maintenance, routine quality assurance activities (daily, quarterly, and annually), and malfunctions (i.e., sudden and unavoidable failures which are not caused by poor maintenance or careless operation). (ELC) (IMA) Response: IDEM recognizes that CEMS are not capable of accurate measurements of compliance-related data one hundred percent (100%) of the time and understands that monitors cannot collect data when calibration, maintenance, quality assurance, and malfunctions occur. Calibration, maintenance, and quality assurance activities are vital to operation of the CEMS and their ability to provide true and accurate data. IDEM evaluates each CEMS' calibration, maintenance, quality assurance, and malfunctions. IDEM has consistently applied enforcement discretion to the calibration, maintenance, and quality assurance activities that benefit the ability of CEMS to provide true and accurate data. CEMS downtime related to malfunctions can occur for a variety of reasons and IDEM must evaluate the cause behind each malfunction. Because of the variety of reasons for a CEMS to malfunction, IDEM will continue to evaluate each CEMS malfunction on a case by case basis when a unit fails to measure, collect, or record data. IDEM proposes to add 326 IAC 3- 5- 8 , Maintenance of Continuous Emission Monitoring and Continuous Opacity Monitoring Equipment, to address these comments. Monitoring Requirements for Peaking Units Comment: As the owner and operator of an infrequently operated unit subject to 40 CFR 75 and 40 CFR 60 requirements, we strongly support IDEM's proposed revision to 326 IAC 3- 5 to allow these units to comply with 40 CFR 75 instead of 40 CFR 60. (PUR) Comment: The Air Pollution Control Board is encouraged to amend the monitoring requirements for units that operate CEMS in accordance with the acid rain program to remove the requirements of the New Source Performance Standards in 40 CFR 60 to perform annual relative accuracy tests as well as quarterly assurance functions, and instead to allow such units to comply with the continuous emission monitoring provisions of the acid rain program under 40 CFR 75. Such an amendment would be consistent with U.S. EPA's announcements on this topic and would help prevent the wastefulness of starting up and operating units solely for the purpose of performing these quality assurance tests. (PSEG) Comment: The amendment for monitoring under 40 CFR 75 should be applicable to units based on the frequency of operation, and not based on whether a unit is classified as a "peaking unit". Although the term "peaking unit" is defined generally under 40 CFR 75, a unit's status as a "peaking unit" is not the basis for whether an operator must conduct certain quality assurance requirements. Instead, 40 CFR 75 utilizes other thresholds, such as hours of operation per quarter, and the number of quarters during which a unit operates for a certain minimum number of hours. For example, the determining factor of whether a unit must conduct a relative accuracy test audit is based, in part, upon whether a unit has operated for 168 unit operating hours in a calendar quarter, which is defined in 40 CFR 75 as a "QA Operating Quarter." Therefore, in order to avoid inconsistency with the U.S. EPA's rules, the rule should apply the requirements as stated in 40 CFR 75. (PSEG) Response: IDEM concurs that allowing peaking units to comply with the monitoring requirements of 40 CFR 75 rather than 40 CFR 60 is reasonable and reduces an unnecessary burden on the source. At this time, IDEM does not have enough information about any other category of emission units that could be addressed in the same way. If sufficient information is provided, IDEM will consider changing the monitoring requirements for other categories of emission units in this rulemaking or in a future rulemaking. Daily Calibration Error Testing Comment: Current rules at 326 IAC 3- 5- 7 (5) and language in the Title V operating permits requires the submittal of daily zero and span checks of continuous emissions monitoring systems. We believe this requirement is a burden to both IDEM and the regulated source. A more effective solution would require the source to create a permanent record of the calibrations kept on site in a format suitable for inspection. This data would not be confidential and would be available at IDEM's request. (PUR) Response: IDEM concurs and has changed the existing reporting requirement to a record keeping requirement in 326 IAC 3- 5- 6

. Emission Testing Comment: The requirement in 326 IAC 3- 6- 3 (b)(1) to test sources at ninety-five percent (95%) to one hundred percent (100%) of permitted operating capacity is impractical for many sources, due to such factors as restrictions in raw material feed, current production requirements, etc. We suggest a more achievable requirement of ninety percent (90%) to one hundred percent (100%) of permitted operating capacity. (ALC) Response: Whether IDEM requires ninety-five percent (95%) or ninety (90%) of maximum capacity, the problems many sources have with reaching maximum capacity will continue to exist. In order to demonstrate compliance at worst case conditions sources must strive to maximize their production rates during compliance testing. Sources who cannot reach maximum capacity have the ability to get approval under 326 IAC 3- 6- 3 (b)(1)(C) for an alternative capacity during testing, derate the unit, or may choose to conduct another compliance test after conditions resume where maximum hourly production rates can be reached. Therefore, IDEM has not changed this requirement. Visible Emissions Evaluations Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 4Comment: ALCOA Inc.-Warrick Operations has many sources of particulate emissions which have very low

opacity (near zero). Many of these sources are controlled by baghouses which have broken bag detectors. The broken bag detectors normally alarm at very low levels of opacity, before any visible emissions (VE) would be detected. When conducting particulate emissions tests on these types of sources, the requirement to conduct at least thirty (30) minutes of visible emissions readings per hour of sampling time in 326 IAC 3- 6- 5 (2) is burdensome, requiring additional personnel. We suggest including an optional waiver of the VE readings by the onsite IDEM staff person if the opacity is zero for the first thirty (30) minutes of sampling time. (ALC) Response: The requirement to read thirty (30) minutes of visible emissions during each one hour source sampling test is important in case a bag detector fails to operate properly. A bag detector does not indicate whether or not the unit is in compliance, it is only an indication of change. In addition, visible emissions tests must be conducted to comply with 40 CFR 60.11(b) and 40 CFR 63.6(h)(4). Visible emissions can be quantified by any trained reader. Therefore, these are done with the performance test with the expectation that the source will demonstrate compliance and that during the test an opacity value will be observed that generally shows compliance. For instance, if the opacity during a test was five percent (5%) and the source had a limit of 10 lbs/hr and the test results showed them at 9.0 lbs/hr an inspector could go out to the site at any time and should see opacity values around five percent (5%). Therefore, the inspector would feel confident the source was still in compliance with their lbs/hr limit. However, if the inspector saw opacity at thirty percent (30%), there would be reason to believe the source was no longer in compliance with their limit since at five percent (5%) opacity they emitted 9.0 lbs/hr and the opacity has increased from five percent (5%) to twenty-five percent (25%). Other Comments Comment: The broad statement in 326 IAC 3- 5- 1 that any source subject to NSPS or NESHAP requirements in 40 CFR 60, 61, or 63 rules are subject to the compliance monitoring requirements of 326 IAC 3- 5 creates significant opportunity for conflicting and overlapping requirements. For example, emission monitoring requirements found in standards promulgated at 40 CFR 63 contain performance specifications (instrument span value and ranges, for example) which may differ from those found at 326 IAC 3 . Lilly recommends that when emission units are subject to requirements in federal rules, they should not be subject to Article 3 requirements. As an alternative, the rule language could be crafted so that in the event of a conflict between specific compliance monitoring requirements in federal regulations (such as an NSPS or NESHAP) and the state rules, the federally mandated specifications and provisions should prevail. Or, rule language could clearly state that affected units should comply with the specifications and provisions under the federal rule in the event of a conflict between the federal rule regulations and 326 IAC 3 . For example, the current rule at 326 IAC 3- 5- 5 (a) and (b) provides that affected electric utility boilers should comply with the provisions of the Acid Rain Program at 40 CFR 75. (ELC) (IMA) Comment: Lilly recommends the language in 326 IAC 3- 5- 5 (a), referring to quality assurance requirements, be revised to incorporate the quality assurance requirements in 40 CFR 63. Lilly believes that the state rules should defer to the quality assurance requirements in the underlying federal rule, 40 CFR 75, 40 CFR 60, or 40 CFR 63. (ELC) (IMA) Response: States must require monitoring in accordance with 40 CFR 60, 40 CFR 61, 40 CFR 63, 40 CFR 70, and 40 CFR 75. IDEM believes there is value in having both the state and federal quality assurance rules apply to ensure consistency in the quality assurance of continuous emission monitoring systems. Some federal rules (especially those found in 40 CFR Part 63) have different quality assurance requirements built into each specific rule. For instance, 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GGG only requires total organic compound monitors to perform quarterly cylinder audits after the initial certification of the system. While this is specific to this rule, cylinder gas audits (CGAs) only quality assure part of the CEMS system and IDEM does not believe that CGA's are sufficient to demonstrate these monitors are still providing accurate data. IDEM believes that continuous emission monitoring systems should have a consistent quality assurance approach for reliable information and data. Rule 326 IAC 3- 5- 5 helps bridge the gap between the federal rules and state rules to ensure consistency in the quality assurance of continuous emission monitoring systems. Comment: Lilly suggests that IDEM consider adding language to 326 IAC 3- 5- 2 (1) that would allow a source to request approval of an alternative monitoring plan in lieu of the performance specifications in 40 CFR 60, Appendix B. The use of alternative monitoring plans encourages development of new technologies, provides flexibility, and enables sources to streamline requirements for monitoring multiple pollutants from a single stack. Similar language allowing sources to request approval for alternative instrument span values and installation locations has already been incorporated into the current versions of 326 IAC 3- 5- 2 (5) and (6), respectively. (ELC) (IMA) Response: 40 CFR 60, Appendix B provides criteria that a monitor must meet to ensure proper performance. It is unclear to IDEM what alternative a source might consider requesting that would ensure proper performance. If further information is provided to demonstrate that valid alternatives exist to the criteria in 40 CFR 60, Appendix B, IDEM will discuss with U.S. EPA whether the alternatives could be federally approvable. Comment: Lilly would appreciate additional clarification of the reporting requirements for relative accuracy test audits (RATAs). Lilly believes RATA reports are to be submitted to the department within 30 days after the Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 5end of each calendar quarter, consistent with the language in 326 IAC 3- 5- 5 (e). However, we also recognize that

common practice has been to submit the report within 45 days after completion of the test, as described in 326 IAC 3- 6- 4 (b). (ELC) (IMA) Response: IDEM's preference is to have RATA reports sooner than thirty (30) days after the end of the calendar quarter, therefore, the reports should be submitted forty-five (45) days after the completion of the test. Comment: To improve consistency with recent federal monitoring rules, the minimum frequency for excess emission reports, stated in 326 IAC 3- 5- 7 , should be changed from quarterly to semiannually. (ELC) (IMA) Response: While federal rules such as 40 CFR 63.10(e) and 40 CFR 60.7(c) allow for the submittal of excess emission reports on a semiannual basis, other federal rules, such as 40 CFR 51, Appendix P, require quarterly submittals of excess emission reports. Because the reporting requirements of 326 IAC 3- 5- 7 are of general applicability, they must meet minimum federal requirements. Allowing sources to submit reports on a semi-annual basis means IDEM may not be aware of excess emissions, deviations, or potential violations for up to two hundred ten (210) days. IDEM feels this is an excessive amount of time to elapse before we are aware of these violations and can take appropriate responses. Reporting on a quarterly basis is consistent with IDEM's implementation of the Part 70 requirements and the reporting of deviations from permitting requirements. Comment: Gap-filling Title V compliance monitoring should not be required on a once-per-shift basis, and redundant monitoring requirements should be eliminated. The IMA supports creation of an incentive program for monitoring or other alternatives to reduce the frequency of testing, paperwork, record keeping, etc. when historical data shows compliance. (IMA) Response: IDEM has included once-per-shift monitoring in the past, but in most cases the minimum frequency has been changed to once-per-day. There still may be some situations where more frequent monitoring will be required, especially for larger units subject to 40 CFR 64, Compliance Assurance Monitoring. Comment: IMA has concerns about monitoring requirements imposed in permits issued by IDEM. Construction and operating permits should not include detailed and excessive compliance monitoring terms without regulatory authority for such terms. There should be no compliance monitoring requirements for trivial activities, insignificant activities, and low-emitting emission units. Compliance monitoring requirements should apply only to emission units that have the potential to cause significant air quality impacts, and such requirements should correspond to the level of potential impacts. (IMA) Response: 326 IAC 2- 5.1- 3 (e)(2), 326 IAC 2- 6.1- 5 (a)(2), 326 IAC 2- 7- 5 (3), 326 IAC 2- 7- 6 (1), 326 IAC 2- 8- 4 (3) and 326 IAC 2- 8- 5 (1) require that all construction and operating permits contain monitoring, testing, record keeping, and reporting requirements to assure compliance with applicable requirements. Compliance monitoring will generally not be required for units with a potential to emit less than twenty-five (25) tons per year unless the owner/operator has accepted enforceable limits to avoid an applicable requirement or the unit is subject to a specific applicable requirement that includes compliance monitoring or work practice standards. For example, if a unit is limited to less than fifteen (15) tons per year of PM10 to avoid PSD requirements, compliance monitoring may still be required to demonstrate compliance with the synthetic minor limit. Units that are regulated by a specific applicable requirement that include compliance monitoring provisions in a rule are required to be included in a permit. For example, degreasers may require specific work practice standards under 326 IAC 8 and would be included in a permit. While many trivial, insignificant, and low-emitting units may have a lower impact than larger emitting units, IDEM cannot ignore those instances where specific applicable requirements apply to those units and the applicable requirements include means to assure compliance.

REQUEST FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS This notice requests the submission of comments on the draft rule language, including suggestions for specific revisions to language to be contained in the draft rule. Mailed comments should be addressed to: #05-330(APCB) Compliance Monitoring Susan Bem Mail Code 61-50 Rule and SIP Development Section Office of Air Quality Indiana Department of Environmental Management 100 North Senate Avenue Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 Hand delivered comments will be accepted by the receptionist on duty at the tenth floor reception desk, Indiana Department of Environmental Management, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana. Comments may be submitted by facsimile at the IDEM fax number: (317) 233-5967, Monday through Friday, between 8:15 a.m. and 4:45 p.m. Please confirm the timely receipt of faxed comments by calling the Air Programs Branch at (317) 234-6530.

COMMENT PERIOD DEADLINE Comments must be postmarked, faxed, or hand delivered by April 30, 2010. Additional information regarding this action may be obtained from Susan Bem, Rule and State Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 6Implementation Plan (SIP) Development Section, Office of Air Quality, (317) 233-5697 or (800) 451-6027 (in

Indiana).

DRAFT RULE

SECTION 1. 326 IAC 3- 4- 1 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 4- 1 Definitions Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 11 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 1. In addition to the definitions provided in IC 13- 11

, 326 IAC 1- 2 , and 326 IAC 2- 7 , the following definitions apply throughout this article unless expressly stated otherwise: (1) "Applicable emission limitation or standard" means any of the following: (A) A state or federal emission limitation or standard applicable to a regulated hazardous air pollutant under 40 CFR 61* or 40 CFR 63*. (B) A state or federal emission limitation or standard applicable to a regulated air pollutant, other than a hazardous air pollutant under Section 112 of the CAA, for which the source is classified as a major source. (1) "Boiler operating day" means a twenty-four (24) hour period between midnight and the following midnight during which any fuel is combusted at any time in the steam-generating unit. It is not necessary for fuel to be combusted the entire twenty-four (24) hour period. (2) "Calendar quarter" means a consecutive three (3) month period (nonoverlapping) beginning on: (A) January 1; (B) April 1; (C) July 1; or (D) October 1. (3) "Certified emissions monitor" means an emissions monitor that meets all applicable performance specifications of 40 CFR 60* or any other performance specification, and for which performance data has been submitted to and approved by the department. (3) "Capture system" means the equipment, including hoods, ducts, fans, and booths, that is used to contain, capture, and transport a pollutant to a control device. (4) "Continuous emission monitoring system" or "CEMS" means the equipment required by the applicable permit, state rule, or federal regulation used to sample, analyze, measure, and provide a continuous, permanent record of emissions in units of the applicable standard or other form, as specified by the U.S. EPA pursuant to regulations under Section 412 of the Clean Air Act. (5) "Continuous opacity monitoring system" or "COMS" means the equipment required by the applicable permit, state rule, or federal regulation used to measure the opacity of the effluent on a continuous basis as either of the following: (A) The optical density of the effluent gas. (B) The opacity of the effluent gas. (6) "Control device" means equipment, other than inherent process equipment, that is used to destroy or remove air pollutants prior to discharge to the atmosphere. The types of equipment that may commonly be used as control devices include the following: (A) Fabric filters. (B) Mechanical collectors. (C) Electrostatic precipitators. (D) Inertial separators. (E) Afterburners. (F) Thermal or catalytic incinerators. (G) Adsorption devices, such as carbon beds. (H) Condensers. (I) Scrubbers, such as wet collection and gas absorption devices. (J) Selective catalytic or noncatalytic reduction systems. (K) Flue gas recirculation systems. (L) Spray dryers. (M) Spray towers. (N) Mist eliminators. (O) Acid plants. (P) Sulfur recovery plants. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 7(Q) Injection systems, such as:

(i) water; (ii) steam; (iii) ammonia; (iv) sorbent; or (v) limestone; injection. (R) Combustion devices independent of the particular process being conducted at an emissions unit, for instance, the destruction of emissions achieved by venting process emission streams to flares, boilers, or process heaters. (S) Other devices acceptable to the department and U.S. EPA. For purposes of this article, the term does not include passive control measures that act to prevent pollutants from forming, such as the use of seals, lids, or roofs to prevent the release of pollutants, use of low polluting fuel or feedstocks, or the use of combustion or other process design features or characteristics. If an applicable requirement establishes that particular equipment that otherwise meets this definition of a control device does not constitute a control device as applied to a particular pollutant-specific emissions unit, then that requirement shall be binding for purposes of this article. (7) "Data" means the results of any type of monitoring or method, including the results of: (A) instrumental or noninstrumental monitoring; (B) emission calculations; (C) manual sampling procedures; (D) record keeping procedures; or (E) any other form of information collection procedure used in connection with any type of monitoring or method. (8) "Emission limitation or standard" means the following: (A) Any applicable requirement, including the following, as defined under the CAA: (i) An emission limitation or standard. (ii) A standard of performance. (iii) A means of emission limitation. (B) An emission limitation or standard may be expressed: (i) in terms of the pollutant, either as: (AA) a specific quantity, rate, or concentration of emissions; or (BB) the relationship of uncontrolled to controlled emissions; or (ii) as either: (AA) a work practice process; or (BB) another form of: (aa) design; (bb) equipment operation; (cc) production limit; or (dd) operation and maintenance requirement. (C) For purposes of 326 IAC 3- 8 , an emission limitation or standard shall not include general operation requirements that an owner or operator may be required to meet. (4) (9) "Emission test", "source sampling test", "compliance test", or "performance test" means a procedure for sampling a gas stream from a single sampling location at a facility, source, emissions unit, or pollution control equipment, to determine a pollutant emission rate, concentration, or parameter while the facility, source, an emissions unit, or pollution control equipment is operating at conditions that result in measurement of the highest emission or parameter values (prior to any control device), or at other operating conditions approved by the department or U.S. EPA. A test shall comprise three (3) sampling runs for a specified sampling time span. Additional conditions may be required by applicable rules, permit, or enforcement order. The test owner or operator shall be performed perform the test using sampling and analytical procedures approved by the department or U.S. EPA for the specific pollutant or parameter and facility, source, emissions unit, pollution control equipment, process, or operation. (5) (10) "Emissions unit", for the purposes of this article, means any part of or activity at a source that emits or has the potential to emit any regulated air pollutant for which an emission limitation or standard has been established. This The term does not alter or affect the definition of the term "unit" for purposes of Title IV of the CAA or of the term "emissions unit" for purposes of Title V of the CAA. (11) "Exceedance" means a condition that: (A) is detected by monitoring that provides data in terms of an emission limitation or standard; and (B) indicates that emissions (or opacity) are greater than the applicable emission limitation or standard (or less than the applicable standard in the case of a percent reduction requirement) consistent with any averaging period specified for averaging the results of the monitoring. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 8(12) "Inherent process equipment" means equipment that is necessary for the proper or safe

functioning of the process, or material recovery equipment that the owner or operator documents is installed and operated primarily for purposes other than compliance with air pollution regulations. The term does not include equipment that must be operated at an efficiency higher than that achieved during normal process operations in order to comply with the applicable emission limitation or standard. For the purposes of this article, inherent process equipment is not considered a control device. (13) "Malfunction" means any sudden, infrequent, and not reasonably preventable failure of air pollution control equipment, process equipment, or a process to operate in a normal or usual manner. Failures that are caused in part by poor maintenance or careless operation are not malfunctions. For purposes of this article, a CEMS or COMS is considered process equipment. (6) (14) "Major source" means any major stationary source or any group of stationary sources as defined described in 326 IAC 2- 7- 1 (22). excluding any source described in 326 IAC 2- 7- 1 (22)(A). (7) (15) "Monitoring" means any form of collecting data on a routine basis to determine or otherwise assess compliance with emission limitations or standards. The term includes the following: (A) Record keeping, if records are used to determine or assess compliance with an emission limitation or standard, including: (i) records of raw material content and usage; (ii) records that document compliance with work practice requirements; or (iii) other records used to determine or assess compliance with an emission limit or standard. (B) Compliance method tests that are conducted on a routine periodic basis. (C) One (1) or more of the following data collection techniques, where appropriate, for a particular circumstance: (i) Continuous emission or opacity monitoring systems. (ii) Continuous process, capture system, control device, or other relevant parameter monitoring systems or procedures, including a PEMS. (iii) Emission estimation and calculation procedures. (iv) Maintenance and analysis of records of fuel or raw materials usage. (v) Recording results of a program or protocol to conduct specific operation and maintenance procedures. (vi) Verification of emissions, process parameters, capture system parameters, or control device parameters, using portable or in situ measurement devices. (vii) Visible emission observations. (viii) Any other form of measuring, recording, or verifying on a routine basis emissions, process parameters, capture system parameters, control device parameters, or other factors relevant to assessing compliance with emission limitations or standards. (8) "Monitor system malfunction" means any interruption in the collection of valid data as a result of the failure of any component of the system to operate within the specifications of the applicable performance specification. (9) (16) "Out of control" means any data collected by a continuous monitoring system during periods immediately following an out of tolerance quality assurance assessment and prior to an acceptable quality assurance assessment. (17) "Owner or operator" means any person who: (A) owns; (B) leases; (C) operates; (D) controls; or (E) supervises; a stationary source subject to this article. (18) "Peaking unit" means the following: (A) An emissions unit that has: (i) an average capacity factor of not more than ten and zero-tenths percent (10.0%) during the previous three (3) calendar years; and (ii) a capacity factor of not more than twenty and zero-tenths percent (20.0%) in each of those calendar years. (B) For purposes of 40 CFR 75*, an emissions unit may initially qualify as a peaking unit if the designated representative demonstrates to the satisfaction of the commissioner that the requirements of clause (A) are met, or will in the future be met, through one (1) of the following submissions: (i) For a unit for which a monitoring plan has not been submitted under 40 CFR 75.62*, the designated representative submits either: Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 9(AA) capacity factor data for the emissions unit for the three (3) calendar years immediately

preceding the date of initial submission of the monitoring plan for the emissions unit under 40 CFR 75.62*; or (BB) if an emissions unit does not have capacity factor data for one (1) or more of the three (3) calendar years immediately preceding the date of initial submission of the monitoring plan for the unit under 40 CFR 75.62*, all available capacity factor data, beginning with the date on which the emissions unit commenced commercial operation, and projected capacity factor data. (ii) For a unit for which a monitoring plan has already been submitted under 40 CFR 75.62*, that has not qualified as a peaking unit under item (i), and where capacity factor changes, the designated representative submits either: (AA) three (3) calendar years of data following the change in the emissions unit's capacity factor showing an average capacity factor of not more than ten and zero-tenths percent (10.0%) during the three (3) previous calendar years and a capacity factor of not more than twenty and zero-tenths percent (20.0%) in each of those calendar years; or (BB) one (1) calendar year of data following the change in the emissions unit's capacity factor showing a capacity factor of not more than ten and zero-tenths percent (10.0%) and a statement that this changed pattern of operation resulting in a capacity factor less than ten and zero-tenths percent (10.0%) is considered permanent and is projected to continue for the foreseeable future. (C) For purposes of 40 CFR 75*, an emissions unit that initially qualifies as a peaking unit must meet the criteria in clause (A) each year in order to continue to qualify as a peaking unit. If such an emissions unit fails to meet such criteria for a given year, the emissions unit no longer qualifies as a peaking unit starting January 1 of the year after the year for which the criteria are not met. If an emissions unit failing to meet the criteria in clause (A) initially qualified as a peaking unit under clause (B), the emissions unit may qualify as a peaking unit for a subsequent year only if the designated representative submits the data specified in clause (B)(ii)(AA). (D) An emissions unit required to comply with the provisions of Subpart H of 40 CFR 75*, under a state or federal NO X mass emissions reduction program, may, pursuant to 40 CFR 75.74(c)(11)*, qualify as a peaking unit on an ozone season basis rather than an annual basis, if the owner or operator reports NO X mass emissions and heat input data only during the ozone season. (10) (19) "Permit" means any applicable permit issued, renewed, amended, revised, or modified under: 326 IAC 2- 1

, (A) 326 IAC 2- 1.1 ; (B) 326 IAC 2- 2 ; (C) 326 IAC 2- 3 ; (D) 326 IAC 2- 5.1 ; (E) 326 IAC 2- 6.1 ; (F) 326 IAC 2- 7 ; (G) 326 IAC 2- 8 ; or (H) 326 IAC 2- 9

. (20) "Potential to emit" shall have the same meaning as provided under 326 IAC 2- 7- 1 (29), provided that it shall be applied with respect to: (A) an emissions unit as defined under subdivision (10); and (B) a stationary source as defined under 326 IAC 2- 7- 1 (38). (21) "Predictive emission monitoring system" or "PEMS" means a system that uses process and other parameters as inputs to a computer program or other data reduction system to produce values in terms of the applicable emission limitation or standard. (22) "QA operating quarter" means a calendar quarter in which there are at least one hundred sixty-eight (168) unit operating hours, as defined in subdivision (25), or, for a common stack or bypass stack, a calendar quarter in which there are at least one hundred sixty-eight (168) stack operating hours, as defined in subdivision (24). (11) (23) "Quality assurance" means those activities performed to ensure that monitoring data are sufficiently representative, accurate, precise, reliable, frequent, and timely. Those activities include, but are not limited to, frequent activities (daily) and less frequent activities (weekly, monthly, quarterly, and yearly). establish validity of data used to demonstrate compliance. (24) "Stack operating hour" means a clock hour during which flue gases flow through a particular stack or duct, either for the entire hour or for part of the hour, while all associated emissions units are combusting fuel. (25) "Unit operating hour" means a clock hour during which an emissions unit combusts any fuel, either for part of the hour or for the entire hour. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 10*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing

Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 4- 1 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2062; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1566; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 30)

SECTION 2. 326 IAC 3- 4- 2 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 4- 2 Certification Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 2. Each report submitted under this article rule and 326 IAC 3- 5 through 326 IAC 3- 7 shall contain a certification of truth, accuracy, and completeness. This certification and any other certification required under this article shall state that, based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements and information in the document are true, accurate, and complete. Reports submitted under 326 IAC 3- 8 shall meet the certification requirements of 326 IAC 2- 7- 4 (f). (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 4- 2 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2063; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477)

SECTION 3. 326 IAC 3- 4- 3 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 4- 3 Conversion factors Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 3. (a) Owners or operators of facilities emissions units subject to this article shall use the following procedures for converting monitoring data to units of the standard where necessary: (1) For The owner or operator of a fossil fuel-fired steam generators, generator shall use the following procedures shall be used to convert gaseous emission monitoring data in parts per million (ppm) to pounds per million British thermal units (Btu) (lbs/MMBtu) where necessary: (A) When the owner or operator of a fossil fuel-fired steam generator elects under this article to measure oxygen (O 2 ) in flue gases, the measurements of owner or operator shall measure the pollutant concentration and oxygen shall be on a dry basis and use the following conversion procedure: used:

(B) When the owner or operator elects under this article to measure carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) in flue gases, the measurement of owner or operator shall measure the pollutant concentration and the CO 2 concentration shall each be on a consistent basis (wet or dry) and use the following conversion procedure: used:

(C) When the owner or operator elects under this article to measure sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) or nitrogen oxides (NO

x ) in the flue gases, the measurement of owner or operator shall measure the diluent concentration and the SO 2 and or the NO

x concentration shall each be on a wet basis and use the following conversion procedure, used, except where wet scrubbers are employed or where moisture is otherwise added to the stack gases: Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 11(D) When the owner or operator elects under this article to measure SO 2 or NO

x in the flue gases, the

measurement of owner or operator shall measure the diluent concentration and the SO 2 and or the NO

x concentration shall each be on a wet basis and use the following conversion procedure, shall be used where wet scrubbers or moisture is otherwise present in the stack gases, provided water vapor content of the stack gas is measured at least once every fifteen (15) minutes at the same point as the pollutant and oxygen measurements are made:

(E) The values used in the equations under this subdivision are derived as follows:

C
ws = Pollutant concentration at stack conditions in grams per wet standard cubic meter

(g/wscm) or pounds per wet standard cubic meter (lbs/wscm), determined by multiplying
the average concentration in parts per million (ppm) for each one (1) hour period by

4.15 × 10 -5 M g/wscm per ppm or 2.59 × 10 -9 M lbs/wscm per ppm, where M is pollutant
molecular weight in grams per gram-mole (g/g-mole) or pounds per pound-mole
(lb/lb-mole).

M = 64.07 for SO 2 and 46.01 for oxides of nitrogen (NO

x ) as NO 2 . C = Pollutant concentration at stack conditions in pounds per dry standard cubic meter (lbs/dscm) or grams per dry standard cubic meter (g/dscm). F, F
c = A factor representing a ratio of the volume of dry flue gases generated to the calorific

value of the fuel combusted (F), and a factor representing a ratio of the volume of carbon dioxide generated to the calorific value of the fuel combusted (F
c ), respectively.
Values of F and F
c are given in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 19*, as applicable.

F
w = A factor representing a ratio of the volume of wet flue gases generated to the calorific

value of the fuel combusted. Values of F

w are given in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method
19*.

B
wa = Proportion by volume of water vapor in the ambient air.

B
ws = Proportion by volume of water vapor in the stack gas. E = Pollutant emission, lbs/MMBtu.
Percent O 2 , percent CO 2 = Oxygen or carbon dioxide volume (expressed as percent) determined with equipment

specified under this article.

Percent O 2ws = Oxygen volume (expressed as percent) measurements made at stack conditions on a

wet basis. (2) For sulfuric acid plants or production facilities, emissions units, the owner or operator shall: (A) establish a conversion factor three (3) times daily according to the procedures of 40 CFR 60.84(b)*; (B) multiply the conversion factor by the average sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) concentration in the flue gases to obtain average SO 2 emissions in pounds per ton (lbs/ton); and (C) report the average sulfur dioxide emissions for each three (3) hour period in excess of the emission standard set forth in 326 IAC 7 in the quarterly summary. report.

(b) The department may approve alternate procedures for computing emission averages that do not require integration of data or alternative methods of converting pollutant concentration measurements to units of the emission standard may be approved by the department if the owner or operator shows that the alternate Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 12procedures are at least as accurate as those in this rule.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 4- 3; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2063; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1566; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 31)

SECTION 4. 326 IAC 3- 5- 1 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 5- 1 Applicability; continuous monitoring requirements for applicable pollutants Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 1. (a) This rule establishes the following: (1) Substantive requirements for continuous monitoring of certain types of sources and emissions units. (2) A process for developing suitable continuous monitoring requirements for other types of sources and emissions units.

(b) This rule applies to the following sources and facilities emissions units hereinafter referred to as affected facilities: sources and emissions units: (1) Any facility source or emissions unit required to perform continuous monitoring under: (A) 326 IAC 12 ; which incorporates by reference the requirements of 40 CFR 60*, or by a standard for hazardous air pollutants under (B) 326 IAC 14 ; which incorporates by reference the requirements of 40 CFR 61*, or (C) 326 IAC 20

. which incorporates by reference the requirements of 40 CFR 63*. (2) Fossil fuel-fired steam generators of greater than one hundred million (100,000,000) British thermal units (Btus) (Btu) per hour heat input capacity. (3) Sulfuric acid plants or production facilities of greater than three hundred (300) tons per day acid production capacity. (4) Petroleum refinery catalyst regenerators for fluid bed catalytic cracking units of greater than twenty thousand (20,000) barrels or eight hundred forty thousand (840,000) gallons per day fresh feed capacity. (5) Portland cement plants. (6) Facilities Sources or emissions units that combust sewage sludge. (7) Sources or emissions units making coke from raw materials, including the following: (A) Coal refining byproducts. (B) Petroleum refining byproducts. (8) Facilities Emissions units in Clark and Floyd Counties that: (A) have potential to emit nitrogen oxides (NO

x ) of greater than or equal to forty (40) tons per year; and (B) are located at sources that have potential to emit NO

x of greater than or equal to one hundred (100) tons per year as described in 326 IAC 10

.

(c) Owners and operators of sources and facilities emissions units described in subsection (b) are subject to the following requirements: (1) Any facility source or emissions unit subject to 326 IAC 12

, which incorporates by reference the requirements of 40 CFR 60*, 326 IAC 14

, which incorporates by reference the requirements of 40 CFR 61* or 326 IAC 20 which incorporates by reference the requirements of 40 CFR 61*, shall comply with the following: (A) The monitoring and reporting requirements as specified for the applicable rule. (B) All requirements of this rule. (2) The owner or operator of fossil fuel-fired steam generators of greater than one hundred million (100,000,000) Btu per hour heat input capacity shall continuously monitor the following: (A) Opacity, unless one (1) of the following occurs: (i) Gaseous fuel is the only fuel combusted. (ii) Oil or a mix of gas and oil are the only fuels combusted and the facility source or emissions unit is Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 13able to comply with both of the following rules without using particulate matter collection equipment:

(AA) 326 IAC 5- 1

. (BB) 326 IAC 6- 2

. (iii) An alternative monitoring requirement request has been granted by the department and approved by U.S. EPA. The owner or operator may request an alternative monitoring requirement may be requested when installation of an opacity monitoring system would not provide accurate determinations of emissions as a result of interference from condensed uncombined water vapor. Any alternative monitoring requirement request shall address the following: (AA) Information pertaining to the inability of the affected facility source or emissions unit to find an acceptable monitoring location prior to the source of the condensed, uncombined water vapor. (BB) A list of proposed alternative monitoring requirements. For each proposed alternative monitoring requirement, the request must provide a detailed description of thresholds or triggers for corrective action resulting from deviation from normal operating parameters and how deviations from key surrogate parameters shall be addressed to insure ensure continuous compliance with all applicable particulate and opacity requirements. An example of an acceptable alternative monitoring requirement is a particulate compliance demonstration that is no less frequent than annual performed at least annually, in accordance with 326 IAC 3- 6 and a compliance monitoring plan that, at a minimum, satisfies monitoring requirements under 326 IAC 2- 7 or 326 IAC 2- 8

. (CC) Record keeping that is consistent with section 6 of this rule. (DD) Reporting frequency that is no less frequent than that required in section 7 of this rule. (iv) Upon approval by the department, the owner or operator of a source required to continuously monitor opacity under this section may be exempted from the requirement to install, certify, and operate a COMS if: (AA) a particulate CEMS for measuring PM emissions is used to demonstrate continuous compliance on a boiler operating day with any applicable emissions limit; and (BB) the particulate CEMS is installed, certified, operated, and maintained on the affected source in accordance with the requirements of Performance Specification 11 (PS-11)* and Procedure 2 of 40 CFR 60, Appendix F*. (iv) (v) An alternative monitoring requirement request granted by the department under item (iii) shall be submitted to U.S. EPA as a state implementation plan (SIP) revision and shall not be in effect until approved as a SIP revision. (B) Sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) under the following conditions: (i) SO 2 pollution control equipment has been installed. (ii) A monitor is required to determine compliance with either: of the following: (AA) 326 IAC 12 ; or (BB) a new construction permit or operating permit required under 326 IAC 2

. (C) Nitrogen oxide (NO

x ) under the following conditions: (i) NO

x pollution control equipment has been installed. (ii) A monitor is required to determine compliance with either: of the following: (AA) 326 IAC 12 ; or (BB) a new construction permit or operating permit required under 326 IAC 2

. (D) The percent oxygen (O 2 ) or carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) if measurements of O 2 or CO 2 in the flue gas are required to convert either SO 2 or NO

x continuous monitoring data, or both, to units of the emission limitation for the particular facility. emissions unit. (3) Sulfuric acid plants or production facilities of greater than three hundred (300) tons per day acid production capacity shall monitor SO 2 for each sulfuric acid producing facility emissions unit within the source. (4) Petroleum refinery catalyst regenerators for fluid bed catalytic cracking units of greater than twenty thousand (20,000) barrels or eight hundred forty thousand (840,000) gallons per day fresh feed capacity shall monitor opacity for each regenerator within the source. (5) Portland cement plants shall monitor opacity at the following facilities: emissions units: (A) Kilns. (B) Clinker coolers. (6) Facilities Sources or emissions units that combust sewage sludge shall monitor from the effluent gas exiting the incinerator the following: (A) Total hydrocarbons. (B) Oxygen. (C) Moisture, unless an alternative method is approved by the department and the U.S. EPA. (D) Temperature. (7) Sources or emissions units making coke from coal shall monitor opacity on the underfire stack associated with each coke oven battery. (8) Facilities Emissions units in Clark and Floyd counties that have potential to emit NO

x greater than or Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 14equal to forty (40) tons per year and are located at sources that have potential to emit NO

x greater than or

equal to one hundred (100) tons per year shall install NO

x continuous emission monitors as described in 326 IAC 10- 1

.

(d) The department may require, as a condition of a construction or operating permit issued under 326 IAC 2- 1

, 326 IAC 2- 2

, 326 IAC 2- 3

, 326 IAC 2- 7

, 326 IAC 2- 8 , or 326 IAC 2- 9 that the owner or operator of a new or existing source of air emissions monitor emissions to ensure compliance with the following: (1) An emission limitation or standard established in one (1) of the permits listed in this subsection. (2) Permit requirements. (3) Monitoring requirements in 326 IAC 7

.

(e) Unless explicitly stated otherwise, nothing in this rule shall: (1) Excuse the owner or operator of a source or emissions unit from any monitoring, record keeping, or reporting requirement that applies under any provision of the CAA or state statutes or regulations. (2) Restrict the authority of the department to impose additional or more restrictive monitoring, record keeping, testing, or reporting requirements on any owner or operator of a source or emissions unit under any other provision of the CAA, including Section 114(a)(1), or state statutes or regulations, as applicable.

(f) Within one hundred eighty (180) days of startup or, for a source existing on the effective date of this rule, within three hundred sixty-five (365) days of becoming an affected facility under this rule, All continuous monitoring systems shall be installed and operational and have the certification testing complete pursuant to under section 3 of this rule within one hundred eighty (180) days of start-up.

*Copies of these documents may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 5- 1 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2064; filed Dec 20, 2001, 4:30 p.m.: 25 IR 1596; errata filed Jan 7, 2002, 2:20 p.m.: 25 IR 1644)

SECTION 5. 326 IAC 3- 5- 2 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 5- 2 Minimum performance and operating specifications Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 2. Owners and operators of monitoring equipment installed to comply with this rule shall comply with the performance specifications and operating requirements as follows: (1) Performance specifications set forth in 40 CFR 60, Appendix B*, shall be used to certify monitoring equipment installed pursuant to this rule; however, where reference is made to the administrator in 40 CFR 60, Appendix B*, the term "department" shall be inserted for purposes of this rule, and where continuous emissions monitors were installed prior to March 1983 for measuring opacity, the performance specifications in 40 CFR 60, Appendix B*, 1982 Edition, shall apply. (2) Cycling times, which include the total time a monitoring system requires to sample, analyze, and record an emission measurement, shall be as follows: (A) Continuous monitoring systems for measuring opacity shall complete a minimum of one (1) cycle of operation (sampling, analyzing, and data recording) for each successive ten (10) second period. (B) Continuous monitoring systems that measure the following emissions shall complete a minimum of one (1) cycle of operation (sampling, analyzing, and data recording) for each successive fifteen (15) minute measuring period: (i) Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ). (ii) Carbon monoxide (CO). (iii) Hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S). (iv) Oxides of nitrogen (NO

x ). (v) Oxygen (O 2 ). (vi) Sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ). Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 15(vii) Total hydrocarbons (THC).

(viii) Total reduced sulfur (TRS). (ix) Volatile organic compounds (VOC). (x) Particulate matter (PM). (3) For opacity monitoring when effluent from two (2) or more affected facilities is emissions units are combined before being released to the atmosphere, the owner or operator may either install a COMS: (A) install a continuous opacity monitoring system on the combined effluent; or (B) install a continuous opacity monitoring system comprised of, and capable of combining the signals from, component transmissometers on each effluent stream. Results shall be reported on combined effluent. This requirement shall not apply to facilities utilizing emissions units using wet flue gas desulfurization equipment. For facilities emissions units using wet flue gas desulfurization equipment, opacity may be reported on the combined exhaust or on individual exhausts except as provided for facilities emissions units affected by an NSPS as described at 40 CFR 60.13(i)*. Compliance for facilities emissions units that opt to report on the individual exhausts shall be determined on the individual exhausts based on data provided in accordance with section 7 of this rule. (4) When the effluent from two (2) or more affected facilities emissions units subject to the same emission standard, other than opacity, are combined before being released to the atmosphere, the owner or operator may report the results as required for each affected facility emissions unit or for the combined effluent. (5) Instrument full-scale response or upper limit of concentration measurement range for all opacity monitoring systems shall be set at one hundred percent (100%) opacity if possible. If the monitoring system is a requirement required by of 40 CFR 60*, 40 CFR 61*, 40 CFR 63*, or 40 CFR 75*, then the appropriate instrument span values and cycling times pursuant to the applicable part shall be used. In all cases, the manufacturer's procedures for calibration shall be followed and may result in an upscale maximum response of less than one hundred percent (100%). The minimum instrument full-scale response for gaseous monitoring systems shall be set at two hundred percent (200%) of the expected instrument data display output corresponding to the emission limitation for the facility emissions unit unless a request for an alternative setting that provides the following information is submitted to and approved by the department and U.S. EPA in writing: (A) The proposed alternate instrument span value. (B) The expected range of pollutant measured concentrations. (C) The control device in use. (D) The process to be controlled. (E) The location of the monitor, such as stack or duct. (F) The reason for requesting the alternate instrument span value. (6) The department and U.S. EPA may approve locations for installing continuous monitoring systems or monitoring devices that vary from locations provided under the performance specifications of 40 CFR 60, Appendix B*, shall be approved by the department and the U.S. EPA upon a demonstration by the owner or operator that installation at alternative locations will enable accurate and representative measurements. (7) Owners or operators of affected facilities emissions units shall conduct continuous emission monitoring system CEMS performance evaluations, upon the request of the department or U.S. EPA, to demonstrate continuing compliance of the continuous emission monitoring systems CEMS with performance specifications as follows: (A) A performance evaluation is a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the performance of the continuous emission monitor in terms of: (i) accuracy; (ii) precision; (iii) reliability; (iv) representativeness; and (v) comparability; of the data acquired by the monitoring system. (B) The department or U.S. EPA may request owners or operators of affected facilities, emissions units,

as defined described in section 1(b) of this rule, to conduct continuous emission monitoring system CEMS performance evaluations if the department has reason to believe, based on review of monitoring data, quality assurance data, inspections, or other information, that the continuous emission monitoring system CEMS is malfunctioning or may be providing invalid data over an extended period. (C) The owner or operator of an affected emissions unit shall submit a written report containing the complete information of the performance evaluations shall be furnished to the department within forty-five (45) days after the test date. The department or U.S. EPA may conduct performance evaluations of the continuous emission monitoring systems CEMS at any time in order to verify the continued compliance of the systems with the performance specifications. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 16*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing

Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 5- 2 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2066; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1566; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 32)

SECTION 6. 326 IAC 3- 5- 3 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 5- 3 Monitor system certification Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 3. Monitor system certification requirements apply to sources and facilities emissions units subject to this rule as follows: (1) The owner or operator shall conduct the applicable performance specifications tests in accordance with the procedures specified in 40 CFR 60*, or other applicable federal regulations, for the required monitoring system as follows: (A) Not later than one hundred eighty (180) days after a facility source or emissions unit start-up or initial monitor installation date. (B) Not later than forty-five (45) source or emissions unit operating days after the date of monitor replacement, date, or significant monitor repair as described in IDEM's Quality Assurance Compliance Branch Continuous Emissions Monitoring Guidance Manual, Chapter 20 (dated June 20, 1997)** 1* (December 1999), which affects the ability of the analyzer to function date. measure emissions accurately. (2) The owner or operator shall notify the department in writing as follows: (A) No less than fourteen (14) days in advance of the start of continuous opacity monitor (COM) certification. (B) No less than thirty-five (35) days in advance of the certification of a gaseous monitoring system. (3) The owner or operator shall submit all of the required test data and information in the form of a written report to the department for review and approval within forty-five (45) days of completion of the performance specification test. (4) The department shall issue a written notice of certification status upon review of the complete certification test report. A required monitoring system is certified when the department issues a certification letter stating that the required monitoring system, including all applicable components, has satisfactorily met all federal and state monitoring requirements. (5) The department may decertify a required monitoring system if an audit or performance evaluation reveals that such the monitoring system or a component thereof does not meet applicable performance specifications or requirements. The owner or operator shall repeat the certification process for the required monitoring system within forty-five (45) days of the date of the department's decertification of the required monitoring system.

*This document is *These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204.

**This document is incorporated by reference. Copies are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center-North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 5- 3; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2067; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 33)

SECTION 7. 326 IAC 3- 5- 4 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 5- 4 Standard operating procedures Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 17Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11

Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 4. (a) The owner or operator of each affected facility specified in section 1(b) of this rule, any facility subject to 326 IAC 12

, or any other facility required to monitor emissions on a continuous basis shall submit to the department, Within ninety (90) days after monitor installation, a complete, written continuous monitoring standard operating procedures procedure (SOP) must be submitted to the department by the owner or operator of: (1) each affected source or emissions unit specified in section 1(b) of this rule; (2) any source or emissions unit subject to 326 IAC 12 ; or (3) any other source or emissions unit required to monitor emissions on a continuous basis.

(b) If revisions are made to the SOP, the owner or operator must submit updates shall be submitted to the department biennially. within two (2) years of the revisions.

(c) At a minimum, the SOP shall describe complete step-by-step procedures and operations as follows: (1) A description of the facility source or emissions unit monitored. (2) A listing of the following for each monitor: (A) Each monitor's brand. (A) Manufacturer's name. (B) Model number. (C) Serial number. (D) Monitoring location. (E) Data handling and acquisition system. (3) Examples of all reporting and log forms. (4) Record keeping and reporting procedures that include the following: (A) Reporting of instrument precision and accuracy. (B) Reporting of emissions data. (5) Methods and procedures for analysis and data acquisition. (6) Calibration procedures that include the following: (A) Calibration error limits and linearity. (B) Calibration gas type, gas quality, and traceability to the National Institute of Standards and Technology. (C) Calibration frequency. (D) Criteria for recalibration, and analysis procedures to periodically verify the accuracy of span and calibration standards. (7) Operation procedures that include: (A) daily procedures; (B) quantifying and recording daily zero (0) and high level drift that meet the requirements of: (i) 40 CFR 60, Appendix B*, Performance Specification 2, Section 4.2; or (ii) other applicable regulations; and (C) other operating parameter checks indicating correct operational status. (8) Quality control and quality assurance procedures that include the following: (A) A statement of quality policy and objectives. (B) Organization and responsibilities description. (C) Calibration and span and zero (0) drift criteria. (D) Excessive drift criteria. (E) Corrective action for excessive drift. (F) Precision and accuracy audits. (G) Corrective action for accuracy audits failure. (H) Data validity criteria. (I) Participation in department audits. (J) Data recording and calculation audits. (9) Preventive maintenance procedures and corrective maintenance procedures that include those procedures taken to ensure continuous operation and to minimize malfunctions. (10) A listing of the manufacturer's recommended spare parts inventory.

(b) (d) If a facility source or emissions unit owner or operator fails to submit a SOP or submits a SOP that fails to address the factors procedures and operations provided under subsection (a), (c), the department may require a performance evaluation pursuant to section 2 of this rule. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 18*This document is incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office,

732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 5- 4 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2068; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 34)

SECTION 8. 326 IAC 3- 5- 5 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 5- 5 Quality assurance requirements Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 5. (a) Except where 40 CFR 75* is applicable for affected facilities sources or emissions units under the acid rain program, quality assurance requirements specified in this section and 40 CFR 60*, Appendix F, apply to continuous emission monitors that monitor the following: (1) Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ). (2) Carbon monoxide (CO). (3) Hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S). (4) Nitrogen oxide (NO

x ). (5) Oxygen (O 2 ). (6) Sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ). (7) Total hydrocarbons (THC). (8) Total reduced sulfur (TRS). (9) Volatile organic compounds (VOC). (10) Particulate matter (PM).

(b) Facilities Sources or emissions units that are subject to 40 CFR 75* shall follow the quality assurance procedures of 40 CFR 75* and report the results in accordance with subsection (e).

(c) Quality control (QC) requirements for continuous opacity monitoring systems COMS are as follows: (1) For calibration drift (CD) assessment, the COMS shall be checked at least once daily. The CD shall be quantified and recorded at zero (0) (or low level) and upscale level opacity. The COMS shall be adjusted whenever the CD exceeds the specification of 40 CFR 60, Appendix B*, Performance Specification 1 (PS-1), and the COMS shall be declared out of control when the CD exceeds twice the specification of PS-1. Corrective actions, followed by a validating CD assessment, are required when the COMS is out of control. (2) For fault indicators assessment, the fault lamp indicators, data acquisition system error messages, and other system self-diagnostic indicators shall be checked at least daily. Appropriate corrective actions shall be taken when the COMS is operating outside the preset limits. (3) For performance audits, checks of the individual COMS components and factors affecting the accuracy of the monitoring data, as described in this subdivision, shall be conducted, at a minimum, on a calendar quarter basis. The absolute minimum checks included in the performance audit are as follows: (A) The status of the optical alignment of the monitor components shall be checked and recorded according to the procedure specified by the monitor manufacturer. Monitor components must be realigned as necessary. (B) The apparent effluent opacity shall be compared and recorded before and after cleaning each of the exposed optical surfaces. The total optical surface dust accumulation shall be determined by summing up the apparent reductions in opacity for all of the optical surfaces that are cleaned. Caution should be employed in performing this check since fluctuations in effluent opacity occurring during the cleaning cycle may adversely affect the results. (C) The zero (0) and upscale response errors shall be determined and recorded according to the CD procedures. The errors are defined as the difference (in percent opacity) between the correct value and the observed value for the zero (0) and high level calibration checks. (D) The value of the zero (0) compensation applied at the time of the audit shall be calculated as equivalent opacity, corrected to stack exit conditions, according to the procedures specified by the manufacturer. The Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 19compensation applied to the effluent recorded by the monitor system shall be recorded.

(E) The optical pathlength correction ratio (OPLR) shall be computed from the monitor pathlength and stack exit diameter and shall be compared, and the difference recorded, to the monitor setup OPLR value. The stack exit correlation error shall be determined as the absolute value of the difference between the measured value and the correct value, expressed as a percentage of the correct value. (F) A three-point calibration error test of the COMS shall be conducted. Three (3) neutral density filters meeting the requirements of PS-1 shall be placed in the COMS light beam path. The monitor response shall be independently recorded from the COMS permanent data recorder. Make A total of five (5) nonconsecutive readings for each filter shall be made. The low-range, mid-range, and high-range calibration error results shall be computed as the mean difference and ninety-five percent (95%) confidence interval for the difference between the expected and the actual responses of the monitor as corrected to stack exit conditions. These values shall be calculated using the procedure of PS-1, Section 8.0. The following are requirements for these values: (i) The calibration error test requires the installation of an external calibration audit device (zero-jig). The zero-jig shall be adjusted to provide the same zero (0) response as the monitor's simulated zero (0). (ii) Use calibration attenuators, that is, neutral density filters or screens, with values that have been determined according to PS-1, Section 7.1.3, "Attenuator Calibration", and produce simulated opacities (as corrected to stack exit conditions) in the ranges listed in Table 1-2 in PS-1. (iii) The stability of the attenuator values shall be checked at least once per year according to the procedures specified in PS-1. The attenuators shall be recalibrated if the stability checks indicate a change of two percent (2%) opacity or greater. (4) The following are requirements for monitor acceptance criteria: (A) The following criteria are to be used for determining to determine if the COMS audit results are acceptable:

TABLE 1. PERFORMANCE AUDIT CRITERIA

Stack Exit Correlation Error < 2 percent Zero and Upscale Responses < 2 percent opacity Zero Compensation < 4 percent opacity Optical Alignment Misalignment error < 2 percent opacity Optical Surface Dust Accumulation < 4 percent opacity Calibration Error < 3 percent opacity (B) The COMS is out of control whenever the results of a quarterly performance audit indicate noncompliance with any of the performance assessment criteria of Table 1 in clause (A). If the COMS is out of control, the owner or operator must shall take the action necessary to eliminate the problem. Following corrective action, the source or emissions unit owner or operator must shall reconduct the appropriate failed portion of the audit and other applicable portions to determine whether the COMS is operating properly and within specifications. The COMS owner or operator shall record both audit results showing the COMS to be out of control and the results following corrective action. COMS data obtained during any out of control period may not be used for compliance determination; the data may be used for identifying periods where there has been a failure to meet quality assurance and control criteria. (C) Repeated audit failures, that is, out of control conditions resulting from revealed in the quarterly audits, indicate that the QC procedures are inadequate or the COMS is incapable of providing quality data. The

source or emissions unit owner or operator shall: (i) increase the frequency of the above QC procedures in this subsection until the performance criteria are maintained; or (ii) modify or replace the COMS whenever two (2) consecutive quarters of unacceptable performance

occur. (5) The performance audit calculations contained in PS-1, Section 8 shall be followed.

(d) Except where 40 CFR 75* is applicable for affected facilities sources or emissions units under the acid rain program, and except for peaking units as defined in 326 IAC 3- 4- 1 (17), quality control requirements for flow monitoring systems are as follows: (1) For CD assessment, the flow monitoring system shall be checked at least once daily. The CD shall be quantified and recorded at zero (0) (or low level) and upscale level. The flow monitoring systems shall be adjusted whenever the CD exceeds the specification of 40 CFR 60, Appendix B, Performance Specification 6 (PS-6)*, and the flow monitoring systems shall be declared out of control when the CD exceeds twice the specification of PS-6. Corrective actions, followed by a validating CD assessment, are required when the flow monitoring system is out of control. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 20(2) An annual relative accuracy test.

(e) A peaking unit as defined in 326 IAC 3- 4- 1 (18) shall comply with the following quality control requirements: (1) The owner or operator of a peaking unit, based on information submitted by the designated representative in the monitoring plan, shall comply with one (1) of the following: (A) Meet the general operating requirements in 40 CFR 75.10* for a NO X CEMS. (B) Provide information satisfactory to the commissioner using the procedure specified in 40 CFR 75, Appendix E* for estimating hourly NO X emission rate, subject to the following: (i) If, in the years after certification of an excepted monitoring system under 40 CFR 75, Appendix E*, an emissions unit's operations exceed a capacity factor of twenty percent (20%) in any calendar year or exceed a capacity factor of ten and zero-tenths percent (10.0%) averaged over three (3) years, the owner or operator shall install, certify, and operate a NO X -diluent CEMS no later than December 31 of the following calendar year. (ii) If the required CEMS has not been installed and certified by the date in item (i), the owner or operator shall report the maximum potential NO X emission rate, as defined in 40 CFR 72.2*, for each unit operating hour, starting with the first unit operating hour after the deadline and continuing until the CEMS has been provisionally certified. (2) The owner or operator of a peaking unit shall conduct a relative accuracy test audit (RATA) on any required CEMS as follows: (A) Except for mercury monitoring systems and as otherwise specified in 40 CFR 75.21(a)(6)*, 40 CFR 75.21(a)(7)*, or 40 CFR 75, Appendix B, Section 2.3.1.2*, RATA shall be performed once every two (2) successive quality assurance (QA) operating quarters for each primary and redundant backup: (i) SO 2 pollutant concentration monitor; (ii) flow monitor; (iii) CO 2 emissions concentration monitor, including O 2 monitors used to determine CO 2 emissions; (iv) CO 2 or O 2 diluent monitor used to determine heat input; (v) moisture monitoring system; (vi) NO X concentration monitoring system; (vii) NO X -diluent CEMS; or (viii) SO 2 -diluent CEMS. (B) For each primary and redundant backup mercury concentration monitoring system and each sorbent trap monitoring system, RATAs shall be performed once every four (4) successive QA operating quarters. (C) A calendar quarter that does not qualify as a QA operating quarter shall be excluded in determining the deadline for the next RATA. (D) Not more than eight (8) successive calendar quarters shall elapse after the quarter in which a RATA was last performed without a subsequent RATA having been conducted. (E) If a RATA has not been completed by the end of the eighth calendar quarter since the quarter of the last RATA, then the RATA must be completed within a seven hundred twenty (720) unit, or stack, operating hour grace period, as provided in 40 CFR 75, Appendix B, Section 2.3.3,* following the end of the eighth successive elapsed calendar quarter, or data from the CEMS will become invalid. (F) The relative accuracy test audit frequency of a CEMS may be reduced, as specified in 40 CFR 75, Appendix B, Section 2.3.1.2*, for primary or redundant backup monitoring systems that qualify for less frequent testing. (G) All required RATAs shall be performed in accordance with the applicable procedures and provisions in 40 CFR 75, Appendix A, Sections 6.5 through 6.5.2.2* and 40 CFR 75, Appendix B, Sections 2.3.1.3* and 2.3.1.4*. (H) For a CO monitor and any other applicable monitor as determined by the commissioner, a RATA shall be performed in accordance with the requirements of this subdivision.

(e) (f) Reporting requirements for performance audits are as follows: (1) Owners or operators of facilities sources or emissions units required to conduct: (A) cylinder gas audit; (B) relative accuracy test audit; or (C) continuous opacity monitor calibration error audit; on continuous emission monitors shall prepare a written report of the results of the performance audit for each calendar quarter, or for other periods required by the department. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports shall be submitted to the department within thirty (30) calendar days after the end of each Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 21quarter.

(2) The performance audit report shall contain the following information: (A) Plant and monitor information, including the following: (i) The plant name and address. (ii) The monitor brand or manufacturer's name, model, and serial number. (iii) The monitor span. (iv) The monitor location. for example, duct, boiler, unit, or stack designation. (B) Performance audit information, including the following: (i) The auditor's name. (ii) A copy of the audit standard's certification. for example, the vendor's Protocol 1 certification, or neutral density filter certification. (iii) All data used to calculate the audit results. (iv) The audit results and an indication if the monitor passed or failed the audit. If the performance audit results show the CEMS or COMS to be out of control, the CEMS or COMS owner or operator must shall report both the audit results showing the CEMS or COMS to be out of control and the results of the audit following corrective action showing the COMS to be operating within specification. (v) Any corrective actions performed as the result of a failed audit.

(f) If (g) Whenever a relative accuracy test audit of any continuous emission monitor listed in subsection (a) or (e) is performed, the department must be notified in accordance with the protocol requirements of 326 IAC 3- 6- 2 at least thirty-five (35) days prior to the audit.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 5- 5 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2069; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 34)

SECTION 9. 326 IAC 3- 5- 6 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 5- 6 Record keeping requirements Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 6. (a) On and after the certification of a monitoring system, the owner or operator of a source or emissions unit subject to this rule shall maintain records, including raw data, of all monitoring data and supporting information for a minimum of five (5) years from the date of any of the following: (1) A monitoring sample. (2) A measurement. (3) A test. (4) A certification. (5) A report. (6) Any other activity required under this article.

(b) The records described in subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) All documentation relating to: (A) design, installation, and testing of all elements of the monitoring system; and (B) required corrective action or compliance plan activities. (2) All maintenance logs, calibration checks, and other required quality assurance activities. (3) All records of corrective and preventive action. (4) A log of plant operations, including emission unit or monitoring system downtime with the following information: (A) Date of facility emissions unit or monitoring system downtime. (B) Time of commencement and completion of each downtime. (C) Reason for each downtime. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 22(D) Nature of system repairs and adjustments.

(c) The owner or operator of a source or emissions unit subject to this rule shall maintain the records required by this section at the source or at such other site, in a manner so that they may be inspected by and make them available to the department or the U.S. EPA if so requested or required. upon request. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 5- 6 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2071)

SECTION 10. 326 IAC 3- 5- 7 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 5- 7 Reporting requirements Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 7. (a) The following reporting requirements apply to sources owner or operator of a source or emissions unit subject to this rule shall submit a monitoring report to the department in accordance with this section.

(b) The owner or operator shall submit the monitoring report in accordance with the following requirements: (1) The owner or operator of sources or emissions units subject to the requirements of section 1 of this rule shall report excess emissions no less frequently than quarterly. For sources required to report the owner or operator of a source or emissions unit for which quarterly such reports are required, the reports shall be: (A) submitted by the facility source or emissions unit owner or operator to the department; and (B) postmarked or delivered by other means no later than thirty (30) calendar days following the last day of the reporting period. (2) If a permit specifies or a rule requires more frequent reports, such the reports shall be: (A) submitted by the facility source or emissions unit owner or operator to the department; and (B) postmarked or delivered by other means no later than fifteen (15) calendar days after the end of each month. (3) Gaseous excess emissions data reports shall be reported using three (3) hour block periods ending at: (A) 03:00; (B) 06:00; (C) 09:00; (D) 12:00; (E) 15:00; (F) 18:00; (G) 21:00; and (H) 24:00. For facilities sources or emissions units that must demonstrate compliance with hourly (one (1) hour), daily (twenty-four (24) hour) average, or thirty (30) day averages, such the information shall be submitted as part of the quarterly report required in this section.

(4) (c) The monitoring report shall contain the following continuous monitoring information summaries, with all times reported in real time: (A) (1) Monitored facility source or emission unit operation time during the reporting period. (B) (2) Excess emissions or parameters, as applicable, reported in units of the standard, or the applicable parameter unit as follows: (i) (A) Date of excess emissions, or other applicable dates. (ii) (B) Time of commencement and completion for each applicable parameter deviation or excess emission data. (C) (3) Magnitude of each excess emission as follows: (i) (A) For opacity as follows: (AA) (i) The actual percent opacity of all six (6) minute (block) averages exceeding the applicable opacity limit shall be reported. If the an exceedance occurs continuously beyond one (1) six (6) minute period, the percent opacity for each six (6) minute period or the highest six (6) minute average opacity for the entire period shall be reported. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 23(BB) (ii) For department approved opacity averaging times other than six (6) minutes, the actual percent

opacity of each averaging period in excess of the applicable limit shall be reported. (CC) (iii) A summary by cause shall be prepared and submitted as part of this report itemizing exceedances by cause. (ii) (B) For gaseous emissions, the excess emissions, in units of the applicable standard, must be reported based on the applicable averaging time, for example, one (1) hour block, three (3) hour block, three (3) hour rolling, in addition to any other reporting requirements that may be applicable. The averaging time is specified in the applicable federal or state rules, or facility in the operating permit for the source or emissions unit. (5) (4) Continuous monitoring system instrument downtime, except for zero (0) and span checks, which shall be reported separately, shall include the following: (A) Date of downtime. (B) Time of commencement. (C) Duration of each downtime. (D) Reasons for each downtime. (E) Nature of system repairs and adjustments.

(d) If there are no excess emissions or monitor downtime in a reporting period, the owner or operator of a source or emissions unit subject to this rule shall do the following: (1) Submit a report indicating that no excess emissions or downtime incidents occurred in the reporting period that includes the start and end dates of the time period. (2) Maintain the report at the source and make available to the department or the U.S. EPA upon request. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 5- 7 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2071)

SECTION 11. 326 IAC 3- 5- 8 IS ADDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 5- 8 Maintenance of continuous emission monitoring and continuous opacity monitoring systems Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 8. (a) This section applies to the maintenance of CEMS and COMS.

(b) The owner or operator of a CEMS or COMS shall: (1) install; (2) calibrate; (3) maintain; (4) operate; and (5) certify; all necessary CEMS or COMS, and related equipment in accordance with applicable federal regulations, this rule, and any applicable permits.

(c) Except for system breakdowns, repairs, calibration checks, and zero and span adjustments, all CEMS and COMS shall be in continuous operation.

(d) Except as otherwise provided by a rule or provided specifically in a permit, if a CEMS or COMS is malfunctioning or will be down for calibration, maintenance, or repairs for a period of twenty-four (24) hours or more, the owner or operator of the CEMS or COMS shall perform supplemental monitoring in accordance with the permit.

(e) The owner or operator of the CEMS or COMS shall do the following: (1) Keep records: (A) in accordance with section 6(b) of this rule; and (B) that describe the supplemental monitoring implemented during any downtime to assure compliance with applicable emission limitations. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 24(2) Submit reports, as applicable, in accordance with section 7(d) of this rule.

(Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 5- 8 )

SECTION 12. 326 IAC 3- 6- 1 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 6- 1 Applicability; test procedures Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 1. This rule applies to any facility source or emissions unit emissions testing performed to determine compliance with applicable emission limitations contained in this title, or for any other purpose requiring review and approval by the department. (such as an alternate emission factor determination). The owner or operator of a sources or emissions unit shall conduct emission tests subject to this rule shall be conducted in accordance with any applicable procedures and analysis methods specified in 40 CFR 51*, 40 CFR 60*, 40 CFR 61*, 40 CFR 63*, 40 CFR 75*, or other procedures approved by the department and U.S. EPA.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Legal Counsel, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Thirteenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 6- 1 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2072; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 36)

SECTION 13. 326 IAC 3- 6- 2 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 6- 2 Source sampling protocols Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 2. (a) When an emissions test is to be performed by any person other than the department, the source or emissions unit owner or operator shall complete a test protocol form and submit the test protocol form to the department not later than thirty-five (35) days prior to the intended test date unless more notice is required under the applicable program. Such rule requires additional notice. The test protocol shall: (1) be on a form approved by the department; or shall (2) contain information equivalent to that required on the form approved by the department. The department shall evaluate and approve the test protocol prior it to being implemented.

(b) After evaluating the completed test protocol form, the department may: (1) inspect the test site; or (2) require additional conditions, including, but not limited to: (A) requiring reasonable modifications to the stack or duct to obtain acceptable test conditions; (B) requiring additional tests to allow for adverse conditions; such as interferences, nonsteady, or cyclic processes; (C) keeping process operating parameter records, operating logs, or charts during the test; (D) placing conditions on control equipment operation to make the operation of control equipment representative of normal operation; or (E) recording specified control equipment operating parameters during the test.

(c) If the department requires modification to: (1) test methods; (2) analytical methods; (3) operational parameters; or (4) other matters included in the emissions test protocol; Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 25the department shall notify the source or emissions unit owner or operator and the testing firm by letter or

telephone not later than twenty-one (21) days prior to the test date.

(d) If the source or emissions unit owner or operator or test firm desires to make a minor change to previously submitted procedures or conditions, the department shall be notified of such the minor change as soon as practicable prior to the intended emissions test date. Such The minor changes shall not be made unless approved by the department prior to the emission test.

(e) Reasonable changes in the emissions test protocol that result from emergency conditions during the test shall be approved by the department if a department staff person is available at the test site, before the test may proceed.

(f) Post-test approval may be granted based on reasonable changes resulting from emergency or reasonably unforeseeable conditions during the test.

(g) The department reserves the right to conduct any portion of the reference method tests using equipment supplied by the department. Notice of acceptable test procedures shall be given to the owner or operator of the

source or emissions unit and its testing representative.

(h) The source or emissions unit owner or operator shall schedule an actual test date and time period and notify the department not later than fourteen (14) days prior to the actual test date. In the event that a previously scheduled test must be canceled and rescheduled, the owner or operator of the source or emissions unit shall notify the department no less than fourteen (14) days in advance of the rescheduled test date. Tests rescheduled for less than fourteen (14) days after notifying the department of the rescheduled test date must be approved by the department. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 6- 2 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2072)

SECTION 14. 326 IAC 3- 6- 3 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 6- 3 Emission testing Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 3. (a) Department staff may observe field test procedures and source or emissions unit operation during the emission test.

(b) The owner or operator of a source or emissions unit shall conduct all emission tests shall be conducted as follows: (1) While The facility source or emissions unit being tested is shall be operating according to clauses (A) and (B), except as allowed under clause (C), as follows: (A) At a minimum, ninety-five percent (95%) to one hundred percent (100%) of its the permitted maximum emissions unit operating capacity description. (B) Under conditions of worst case emissions, and if the worst case emission condition is not known, then the worst case emission condition shall be assumed to be the maximum process or operating rate of the emissions unit as listed in the permit's emissions unit description. (C) Under other capacities or conditions as specified in an applicable requirement or approved by the department. As used in this clause, "capacity" means the design capacity of the emissions unit or other operating capacities agreed to by the owner or operator of the source or emissions unit and the department, including, but not limited to, process conditions when the department believes that changes in the operating capacities have the potential to affect emission levels. (2) Under conditions representative of normal operations. (3) Under other capacities or conditions specified and approved by the department. As used in this subdivision, "capacity" means the design capacity of the facility or other operating capacities agreed to by the

source and the department. (2) All test runs for a given pollutant shall be conducted within twenty-four (24) hours unless process Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 26variables or mandatory test lengths of greater than two (2) hours make this impracticable. In these

cases, the testing shall be conducted on consecutive days. Other periods or duration may be approved by the commissioner.

(c) Facilities Sources or emissions units subject to 326 IAC 12

, New Source Performance Standards, 326 IAC 14
, or 326 IAC 20 Hazardous Air Pollutants, shall be tested under conditions as specified in the applicable provision for that facility source or emissions unit in 40 CFR 60*, 40 CFR 61*, or 40 CFR 63* and this rule where appropriate.

(d) The owner or operator of a source or emissions unit shall make available at the test site calibration results of the various sampling components. The information shall include the following: (1) The date or dates the test was performed. (2) The methods used. (3) The calibration data. (4) The results. All components requiring calibration shall be calibrated within sixty (60) days prior to the actual test date. Post-test calibrations shall be performed on the components not later than forty-five (45) days after the actual test date. Components requiring calibration are listed in the federal test methods specified in section 5 of this rule.

(e) The department may perform or require the performance of audits of equipment or procedures associated with the test series up to the time of the actual performance of the test, between test runs, or following the test series. The department reserves the right to perform or observe all associated analyses.

(f) The original or a photocopy of the raw field data generated during the test series shall be provided to the department observer upon request if such the request may be reasonably met under the existing circumstances.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 6- 3; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2073; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 37)

SECTION 15. 326 IAC 3- 6- 4 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 6- 4 Reporting Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 4. (a) All emission tests for which a test protocol form was submitted pursuant to the department under section 2 of this rule shall be reported to the department in the form of an emission test report containing the following information: (1) The reported testing methods and results certified as true and accurate and in compliance with this rule by the person responsible for conducting the emissions test. (2) Information regarding the test, including the following: (A) Compliance status of the unit or units tested including a complete listing of all applicable compliance limits. (A) (B) A description of the facility or facilities emissions unit or units being tested. (B) (C) The date or dates on which the test was performed. (C) (D) The type of tests conducted. (D) (E) The type of process and control equipment utilized. (E) (F) The source name and location. (F) (G) The purpose of the tests. (G) (H) The test participants and their titles. (3) Tabulated data and results, including the following: (A) The process weight rate or heat input rate. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 27(B) The referenced or derived conversion factors.

(C) The stack gas flow rate. (D) Measured emissions given in units consistent with the applicable emission limitations. (E) The average value of emissions from any continuous gaseous emissions monitoring system in units consistent with the applicable emission limitations if applicable to the pollutant being tested. (E) (F) If applicable, visible emissions observations or six (6) minute average continuous opacity monitor readings. (F) Average value of emissions from any continuous gaseous emissions monitoring system in units consistent with the applicable emission limitations if applicable to the pollutant being tested. (4) A description of process and control devices, including the following: (A) A process flow diagram. (B) The maximum design capacities. (C) A fuel analysis and heat value for heat input rate determinations. (D) The process and control equipment operating conditions. (E) A discussion of variations from normal plant operations. (F) The stack height. (G) The exit diameter. (H) The volumetric flow rate (cubic feet per minute). (I) The exit temperature. (J) The exit velocity. (5) A description of sampling methods used, including the following: (A) A brief discussion of the analytical procedures with justifications for any variance from reference method procedures. (B) Specification of the following: (i) The number of sampling points. (ii) The time per point. (iii) The total sampling time per run. (C) A cross-sectional diagram of the sampling site showing sampling points. (D) A diagram showing the following: (i) The stack dimensions. (ii) The sampling location. (iii) The distance from the nearest flow disturbance upstream and downstream of the sampling points. (iv) The diagram of the sampling train. (6) Sampling and analytical procedures used, including the following: (A) Results and calculations, including the following: (i) Units consistent with the applicable emission limitation. (ii) One (1) complete calculation using actual data for each type of test performed. (iii) Raw production data signed by the source official. (iv) Photocopies of all actual field data. (B) Laboratory report, including the following: (i) The chain of custody. (ii) Copies of all calibration data for equipment used in sampling as described in section 3(d) of this rule. (C) Applicable rules and regulations showing the emission limitations. (D) For particulate matter tests, If applicable, copies of visible emissions evaluations or opacity monitor readings. (E) Copies of any continuous gaseous emissions monitoring system readings for gaseous pollutant tests.

(b) The owner or operator of a source or emissions unit shall submit all emission test reports must be received by to the department not later than forty-five (45) days after the completion of the testing. An extension may be granted by the department if the owner or operator of the source or emissions unit submits to the department a reasonable written explanation for the requested extension not later than five (5) days prior to the end of the initial forty-five (45) day period. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 6- 4 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2073)

SECTION 16. 326 IAC 3- 6- 5 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 6- 5 Specific testing procedures; particulate matter; PM 10 ; sulfur dioxide; nitrogen oxides; volatile organic compounds Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 28Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 5. (a) Tests for particulate matter tests (PM) and particulate matter ten (10) microns or less in diameter (PM 10 ) shall be conducted in accordance with the following procedures: (1) For PM: 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 5*, 5A*, 5B*, 5C*, 5D*, 5E*, or 5F*, or Method 17*, as applicable, or other procedures approved by the department and U.S. EPA. (2) For PM 10 : 40 CFR 51, Appendix M, Method 201* or 201A*, and 202*. The measurement of condensible PM 10 using the procedures described in Method 202* is not required if the applicable emission limitation is contained at 326 IAC 6.8- 2 , unless otherwise specified by 326 IAC 6.5 or 326 IAC 6.8 . 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 5*, in conjunction with Method 202*, may also be used, subject to the approval of the department and U.S. EPA. (2) (3) Visible emissions (VE) evaluations shall be performed in conjunction with a particulate emissions PM, PM 10 , or other mass emission rate test of air pollutants, as required by the department. The VE evaluations shall be conducted by a qualified observer in accordance with the procedures contained in 326 IAC 5- 1- 4 . VE readings shall be continuously recorded for at least thirty (30) minutes per hour of sampling time for each sampling repetition, unless otherwise mandated by federal regulation. A waiver from this requirement may be granted by the on-site department staff person if adverse conditions exist that would invalidate the VE readings. Complete waivers from the requirement to conduct VE readings during a compliance test may not be granted to facilities for the source or emissions unit required to complete opacity testing pursuant to 40 CFR 60.8*. Facilities Emissions units equipped with continuous opacity monitors may submit the six (6) minute integrated readings of such the monitors during the sampling period, instead of performing VE evaluations, provided: (A) the monitoring system meets the performance specifications as specified in 40 CFR 60, Appendix B*, and is, or will be, certified by the department; and (B) the monitor readings submitted with the test include a zero (0) and upscale calibration check before the first test run and following the end of the final run; and (C) if more than one (1) day of testing is required to complete the three (3) runs, the zero (0) and span checks shall be performed at the beginning of each day's testing and at the conclusion of each day's final run. (3) (4) At least three (3) repetitions of the test shall be performed under consistent facility source or emissions unit operating conditions unless otherwise allowed by the department. For boiler emissions testing, at least one (1) of the three (3) repetitions shall be conducted during a normal sootblowing cycle that is consistent with frequency and duration normally experienced. (4) (5) At Richmond Power and Light's Whitewater Generating Station, when sootblowing occurs during one (1) of the three (3) repetitions, emission test results shall be evaluated using either a time weighted averaging period (TWAP) or a straight averaging technique. When using TWAP, the following equation shall be used to ensure proper weighting of an intermittent cleaning cycle performance test run regardless of the length of the cleaning cycle and regardless of the number and duration of the test runs made on the unit. When using TWAP, the representative pounds per hour of particulate emissions shall be calculated using the following equation:

Where: E = Pounds per hour of particulate emissions.

E
cc = Average E of sample containing cleaning cycle.

E
ncc = Average E of sample containing no cleaning cycle. A = Hours of cleaning cycle operation during sample. B = Hours with no cleaning cycle operation during sample. R = Average hours of operation per twenty-four (24) hours. S = Average hours of cleaning cycle operation per twenty-four (24) hours. (5) (6) Only those fuels representative of normal fuel quality used during normal operations shall be combusted. (6) (7) During each repetition, each sampling point shall be sampled for a minimum of two (2) minutes. (7) (8) The total test time per repetition shall be no less than sixty (60) minutes. (8) (9) The total sample volume per repetition shall be no less than thirty (30) dry standard cubic feet (dscf). (9) (10) The total particulate weight collected from the sampling nozzle, probe, cyclone (if used), filter holder Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 29(front half), filter, and connecting glassware, and, if required in subdivision (2), the impinger catch, shall be

reported to the department and U.S. EPA. Particulate analysis of the impinger catch is not required, unless specified by the department.

(b) The owner or operator shall conduct sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) tests shall be conducted in accordance with the following procedures: (1) 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6*, 6A*, or 6C*, or 8*, as applicable, or other procedures approved by the department and U.S. EPA. (2) At least three (3) repetitions of two (2) samples, each according to 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6* or 6A*, or 6C*, or three (3) repetitions according to 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6C* or 8*, performed under identical facility source or emissions unit operating conditions, shall constitute a test. For boiler emissions testing, only those fuels representative of fuel quality during normal operations shall be combusted. (3) During each of the repetitions for 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 8*, each sampling point shall be sampled for a minimum of two (2) minutes. (4) (3) The total test time per repetition shall be as follows: (A) For tests using 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6* or 6A*, or 6C*, a minimum of twenty (20) minutes per run with a thirty (30) minute interval between each run. (B) For tests using 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6C*, a minimum of sixty (60) minutes per run. (B) (C) For tests using 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 8*, a minimum of sixty (60) minutes per run, with the following criteria: (i) During each of the repetitions, each sampling point shall be sampled for a minimum of two (2) minutes. (5) (ii) The total sample volume per repetition under 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 8*, shall be no less than forty (40) dry standard cubic feet (dscf). (iii) During each of the repetitions, the sample rate shall not exceed one (1) cubic foot per minute (cfm).

(c) The owner or operator shall conduct nitrogen oxide (NO

x ) tests shall be conducted according to the following procedures: (1) 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 7*, 7A*, 7B*, 7C*, or 7E*, as applicable, or other procedures approved by the department and U.S. EPA. (2) For Methods 7*, 7A*, 7B*, or 7C*, at least three (3) repetitions of four (4) samples each shall constitute a test. (3) For Method 7E*, three (3) test runs, each a minimum of sixty (60) minutes, shall constitute a test.

(d) The owner or operator shall conduct volatile organic compounds (VOC) emissions tests shall be conducted in accordance with the following procedures: (1) 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 25*, or other procedures approved by the department and U.S. EPA, shall be used for the total nonmethane organic emissions. (2) At least three (3) samples shall be collected and analyzed. (3) The total test time per repetition shall be a minimum of sixty (60) minutes. (4) Bulk gasoline terminals subject to 326 IAC 20- 10 shall be tested in accordance with 40 CFR 63, Subpart R*. All other bulk gasoline terminals shall be tested in accordance with the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) at 40 CFR 60, Subpart XX*. During all compliance tests, 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 21* shall be used for determining whether there are any leaks from the hatches or flanges of the gasoline transports. If any leak is detected, the transport shall not be used for the capacity of the compliance test of the bulk gas terminal. The threshold for leaks shall be as follows: (A) Five hundred (500) parts per million methane for all bulk gas terminals subject to 40 CFR 63, Subpart R*. (B) Ten thousand (10,000) parts per million methane for all bulk gas terminals subject to 40 CFR 60, Subpart XX* and for all other bulk gasoline terminals.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 6- 5 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2074; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 37) Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 30SECTION 17. 326 IAC 3- 6- 6 IS ADDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 6- 6 Test invalidation Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 6. Based on the department's evaluation, any test series or test run may be considered invalid or unacceptable for any of the following reasons: (1) Failure to do any of the following: (A) Follow the approved protocol and adhere to any procedure or requirement of the approved method or other protocol conditions approved or required by the department. (B) Meet any conditions required by the department for the purpose of conditionally accepting a test that does not fully meet the testing requirements. (C) Demonstrate or comply with reference methods' quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) requirements. (D) Provide or report the required data in order for the department to complete the review of the test conditions, specifications, and results. (2) Use of nonrepresentative process or operating conditions or control device operation. (3) Observation of fugitive emissions from the emissions unit being tested by the department or authorized representative. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 6- 6 )

SECTION 18. 326 IAC 3- 7- 1 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 7- 1 Applicability Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 1. This rule applies to fuel sampling and analysis that is performed to determine compliance with the emission limitations specified in 326 IAC 7

. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 7- 1 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2075; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477)

SECTION 19. 326 IAC 3- 7- 2 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 7- 2 Coal sampling and analysis methods Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 2. (a) Owners or operators of coal sampling systems for sources with total coal-fired capacity greater than or equal to one thousand five hundred (1,500) million British thermal units (Btus) (Btu) per hour actual heat input shall follow procedures specified in ASTM D2234-89*, "Standard Methods for Collection of a Gross Sample of Coal", unless otherwise provided in section 3 of this rule. Additionally, the coal sampling system shall meet the following requirements: (1) The coal sample acquisition point shall be at a location where representative samples of the total coal flow to be combusted by the facility or facilities emissions unit may be obtained. A single as-bunkered sampling station may be used to represent the coal to be combusted by multiple facilities emissions units using the same stockpile feed system. (2) The increment collection method to be used is specified in ASTM D2234-89*, Table 1, I-A-1, I-B-1, or I-C-1. (3) The opening of the sampling device shall be at least two and one-half (2.5) times the top-size of the coal and not less than one and one-fourth (1.25) inches. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 31(4) The sampling device shall have sufficient capacity to completely retain or entirely pass the increment

without loss or spillage. (5) The velocity with which the cross-stream cutting instrument travels through the stream shall not exceed eighteen (18) inches per second. The velocity requirement shall not apply to a swing-arm sampler or to a sampler whose cutter opening is perpendicular to the stream of coal. Owners or operators of all coal sampling systems shall detail the proper operating procedures in the standard operating procedures document required under section 5 of this rule. (6) Increments obtained during the sampling period shall be protected from changes in composition to maintain the integrity of constituent characteristics required to convert sample sulfur content to units of the applicable emission standard. (7) A comparison of weight or volume of collected sample with that of the total flow of coal shall be conducted at a minimum of one (1) time every two (2) weeks to assure a constant sampling ratio is maintained for increments composited into a sample representing a single twenty-four (24) hour period. (8) A routine inspection of the sampling system shall be established to meet requirements and guidelines specified in ASTM D4702-87*, "Guide for Inspecting Mechanical Coal Sampling Systems that Use Cross-Cut Sample Cutters for Conformance with Current ASTM Methods". (9) Composite samples shall be collected for analysis at a minimum of one (1) time per twenty-four (24) hour period.

(b) Owners or operators of coal sampling systems for sources with total coal-fired capacity between one hundred (100) and one thousand five hundred (1,500) million Btus Btu per hour actual heat input shall comply with requirements: specified as follows: (1) in subsection (a); (2) in section 3 of this rule; or (3) shall meet the following minimum requirements: (A) The coal sample acquisition point shall be at a location where representative samples of the total coal flow to be combusted by the facility or facilities emissions unit may be obtained. A single as-bunkered or as-burned sampling station may be used to represent the coal to be combusted by multiple facilities emissions units using the same stockpile feed system. (B) Coal shall be sampled at least three (3) times per day and at least one (1) time per eight (8) hour period unless no coal is bunkered during the preceding eight (8) hour period. (C) Minimum sample size shall be five hundred (500) grams. (D) Samples shall be composited and analyzed at the end of each calendar month.

(c) Coal samples shall be prepared for analysis in accordance with procedures specified in ASTM D2013-86*, "Standard Method of Preparing Coal Samples for Analysis". The preparation of samples shall meet the following requirements: (1) Samples shall be prepared in accordance with ASTM D2013-86*, Procedure A or Procedure B. (2) Sample preparation shall be checked at weekly intervals by performing a split sample of the twenty-four (24) hour composite sample and preparing and analyzing these two (2) identically.

(d) The heat content of coal samples shall be determined in accordance with procedures specified in ASTM D2015-95*, "Standard Test Method for Gross Calorific Value of Solid Fuel by the Adiabatic Bomb Calorimeter", or ASTM D3286-91A*, "Standard Test Method for Gross Calorific Value of Coal and Coke by the Isothermal Jacket Bomb Calorimeter". Restandardization requirements in Section 11 of both methods shall be followed. Precision requirements for repeatability shall be verified according to Section 16.1.1 of both methods at a minimum of once per week.

(e) The sulfur content of coal samples shall be determined according to procedures specified in ASTM D3177-89*, "Standard Test Methods for Total Sulfur in the Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke", or ASTM D4239-94*, "Standard Test Methods for Sulfur in the Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke Using High Temperature Tube Furnace Combustion Methods". Precision requirements for repeatability shall be verified according to ASTM D3177-89*, Section 13, or ASTM D4239-94, Section 18*, at a minimum of one (1) time per week. The laboratory that performs the analysis shall participate in an interlaboratory audit program using coal samples supplied by the department.

(f) Compliance with this section is required unless a source owner or operator demonstrates to The department that may approve minor modifications to the coal sampling and analysis procedures at a source upon demonstration by the source owner or operator that the minor modifications are necessary to meet Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 32the requirements of this section.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 7- 2 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2075; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 38)

SECTION 20. 326 IAC 3- 7- 3 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 7- 3 Alternative coal sampling and analysis methods Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 3. (a) As an alternative to the coal sampling and analysis procedures in section 2 of this rule, a source owner or operator may use manual or other non-ASTM automatic sampling and analysis procedures upon a demonstration as described in subsection (b), submitted to and approved by the department for approval, and U.S. EPA that such the procedures provide sulfur dioxide emission estimates representative either of estimates based on coal sampling and analysis procedures specified in section 2 of this rule or of continuous emissions monitoring. The demonstration shall consist of one (1) or more of the following methods:

(1) (b) For the demonstration described in this section, a source owner or operator may submit documentation of procedures and results of a stopped-belt bias test or other comparisons between a sampling system meeting the requirements of section 2 of this rule and those methods and procedures proposed by the source owner or operator. A stopped-belt bias test and a sampling system meeting the requirements of section 2 of this rule shall be considered reference method systems. A comparison shall utilize a series of at least twenty-five (25) reference method system samples paired with nonreference method system samples and analyzed for the percent of sulfur content to determine the presence of significant systemic error. The detection of significant systemic error shall be based on the application of a statistical test (t-test) to determine if there is a difference between the reference and nonreference systems at the ninety-five percent (95%) confidence level, according to the following formula:

Where: t = Calculated t value.

d = Average difference between paired data. Sd = Standard deviation of the differences. N = Number of paired data sets. The calculated t value is compared to the t value in the standard statistical t tables at the ninety-five percent (95%) probability and the appropriate degrees of freedom (n - 1). If the calculated t value is greater than or equal to the value of t in the t table, then the systems are not comparable. Certain coals with low variability may detect a small bias, which may be acceptable as decided on a case-by-case basis. This method tests for positive and negative bias. Provisions for testing only for a negative bias that would cause a source owner or operator to report less than actual values may be acceptable if supported by statistical tests. Upon request, the department shall provide written guidance to a source owner or operator as to the procedures to be followed in conducting this comparison. (2) Other procedures may be acceptable if submitted to the department for approval and the department approves.

(b) (c) The demonstration provided described in subsection (a) this section shall be repeated upon any significant change to the coal sampling procedures or upon notification by the department that a new demonstration is necessary. If the department has reason to doubt that the alternative sampling and analysis procedures are comparable to methods and procedures provided in section 2 of this rule, based on: (1) inspections; Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 33(2) monitoring;

(3) quality assurance data; or (4) other information; the department may notify the owner or operator that the demonstration shall be repeated. Written notification by the department of the request shall be made to the source owner or operator allowing at least sixty (60) days to schedule the demonstration. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 7- 3; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2077; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477)

SECTION 21. 326 IAC 3- 7- 4 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 7- 4 Fuel oil sampling; analysis methods Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 4. (a) The source owner or operator shall perform sampling and analysis of the sulfur content of fuel oil shall be performed in accordance with the following ASTM procedures: (1) Collection of fuel oil samples shall be conducted according to either of the following: (A) ASTM D4057-88*, "Standard Practice for Manual Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum Products". (B) ASTM D4177-82*, "Standard Method for Automatic Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum Products". (2) Determination of sulfur content shall be conducted according to any of the following: (A) ASTM D129-95*, "Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Products (General Bomb Method)". (B) ASTM D1266-91*, "Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Products (Lamp Method)". (C) ASTM D1552-95*, "Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Products (High-Temperature Method)". (D) ASTM D2622-94*, "Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Products (X-Ray Spectrographic Method)". (3) Determination of heat content shall be conducted according to ASTM D240-92*, "Standard Test Method for Heat of Combustion of Liquid Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb Calorimeter".

(b) An A source owner or operator may, with the prior written approval of the department and U.S. EPA, modify the procedures specified in subsection (a), use alternate equivalent procedures, or rely upon equivalent sampling and analysis procedures performed by the vendor prior to delivery of the fuel oil to the owner or operator.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 7- 4 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2077; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 40)

SECTION 22. 326 IAC 3- 7- 5 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 7- 5 Record keeping requirements; standard operating procedures Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 5. (a) Owners or operators of sources with total coal-fired capacity greater than or equal to one hundred (100) million British thermal units per hour actual heat input shall develop a standard operating procedure (SOP) to be followed for: (1) sampling; (2) handling; (3) analysis; Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 34(4) quality control;

(5) quality assurance; and (6) data reporting of the information collected pursuant to under sections 2 through 4 of this rule. In addition, any revision to the SOP shall be submitted to the department. kept at the site.

(b) The owner or operator of a source or emissions unit subject to this rule shall maintain records sufficient to verify compliance with the procedures specified in sections 2 through 4 of this rule. Records shall be: (1) maintained for a period of five (5) years; and shall be (2) made available upon request by the department. The department may at any time perform a systems audit to determine compliance with the requirements in sections 2 through 4 of this rule. Audit procedures shall be submitted to the owner or operator of a fuel sampling and analysis system subject to audit prior to conducting such the audit. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 7- 5 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2078; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477)

SECTION 23. 326 IAC 7- 2- 1 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 7- 2- 1 Reporting requirements; methods to determine compliance Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 1. (a) As used in this article, "weighting factor" means the daily quantity of coal bunkered or megawatt generation or other appropriate measure of the output of a combustion source.

(b) As used in this article, "rolling weighted average sulfur dioxide emission rate" means the summation of the average sulfur dioxide emission rate times the daily weighting factor divided by the summation of the weighting factors.

(c) Owners or operators of sources or emissions units subject to 326 IAC 7- 1.1

, 326 IAC 7- 4 , or 326 IAC 7- 4.1 shall submit to the commissioner the following reports based on fuel sampling and analysis data obtained in accordance with procedures specified under 326 IAC 3- 7: (1) Fuel combustion sources with total coal-fired heat input capacity greater than or equal to one thousand five hundred (1,500) million British thermal units (MMBtu) per hour shall submit quarterly reports of the thirty (30) day rolling weighted average sulfur dioxide emission rate in pounds per MMBtu. Records of the daily average coal sulfur content, coal heat content, weighting factor, and daily average sulfur dioxide emission rate in pounds per MMBtu shall be submitted to the department in the quarterly report and maintained by the source owner or operator for a period of at least two (2) years. (2) Fuel combustion sources with total coal-fired heat input capacity greater than one hundred (100) and less than one thousand five hundred (1,500) MMBtu per hour shall submit quarterly reports of the calendar month average coal sulfur content, coal heat content, and sulfur dioxide emission rate in pounds per MMBtu and the total monthly coal consumption. (3) All other fuel combustion sources shall submit reports of calendar month average sulfur content, heat content, fuel consumption, and sulfur dioxide emission rate in pounds per MMBtu upon request.

(d) Compliance or noncompliance with the emission limitations contained in 326 IAC 7- 1.1

, 326 IAC 7- 4

, or 326 IAC 7- 4.1 may be determined by a stack test conducted in accordance with 326 IAC 3- 6 utilizing procedures outlined in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6*, 6A*, 6C*, or 8*.

(e) (d) Fuel sampling and analysis data shall be collected pursuant to the procedures specified in 326 IAC 3- 7- 2 or 326 IAC 3- 7- 3 for coal combustion or 326 IAC 3- 7- 4 for oil combustion. and these data may be used to determine compliance or noncompliance with the emission limitations contained in 326 IAC 7- 1.1

, 326 IAC 7- 4

, or 326 IAC 7- 4.1 . Computation of calculated sulfur dioxide emission rates from fuel sampling and analysis data shall be based on the emission factors contained in U.S. EPA publication AP-42* unless other emission factors based on site-specific sulfur dioxide measurements are approved by the commissioner and the U.S. EPA. Fuel sampling and analysis data shall be collected as follows: (1) For coal-fired fuel combustion sources with heat input capacity greater than or equal to one thousand five Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 35hundred (1,500) MMBtu per hour, compliance or noncompliance shall be determined using a thirty (30) day

rolling weighted average sulfur dioxide emission rate in pounds per MMBtu unless a shorter averaging time or alternate averaging methodology is specified for a source under this article. (2) For all other combustion sources, compliance or noncompliance shall be determined using a calendar month average sulfur dioxide emission rate in pounds per MMBtu unless a shorter averaging time or alternate averaging methodology is specified for a source under this article.

(f) A determination of noncompliance under either the method specified in subsection (d) or (e) shall not be refuted by evidence of compliance under the other method.

(g) Upon written notification of an emissions unit owner or operator to the department, continuous emission monitoring data collected and reported under 326 IAC 3- 5 may be used as the means for determining compliance with the emission limitations in this article. Upon such notification, the other requirements of this rule shall not apply.

(e) Compliance or noncompliance with the emission limitations contained in 326 IAC 7- 1.1 or 326 IAC 7- 4 may be determined by an appropriate method as follows: (1) A stack test conducted in accordance with 326 IAC 3- 6 using procedures in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6*, 6A*, 6C*, or 8*. A compliance determination based on stack testing is not sufficient to demonstrate compliance on a continuous basis. (2) A continuous emission monitoring system in accordance with 326 IAC 3- 5

. (3) Source sampling in accordance with 326 IAC 3- 6

. (4) Fuel sampling and analysis data collected in accordance with subsection (d) or 326 IAC 3- 7

. (5) Other methods approved by the commissioner and U.S. EPA.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 7- 2- 1 ; filed Aug 28, 1990, 4:50 p.m.: 14 IR 52; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2078; errata filed Feb 9, 1999, 4:06 p.m.: 22 IR 2006; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477; errata filed Nov 7, 2001, 3:00 p.m.: 25 IR 813; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:30 p.m.: 26 IR 1565; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 42; filed May 25, 2005, 10:50 a.m.: 28 IR 2953)

Notice of Public Hearing

Posted: 03/31/2010 by Legislative Services Agency An html version of this document. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:03:08AM EDT DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA Page 36

# A PPENDIX 

# D

### Publishers' Affidavits

First Hearing

December I, 2010Prescribed by State Board of Accounts 

### 80315-5726503 General Form No. 99P (Rev. 2009A)



### IND DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANA To: INDIANAPOLIS NEWSPAPERS

MARION COUNTY, INDIANA 307 N PENNSYLV ANlA ST- PO BOX 145 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46206-0145



### PUBLISHER'S CLAIM

LINE COUNT Display Matter

- (Must not exceed two actual lines, neither of which shall total more thao four solid lines of the type in which the body of the advertisement is set). -number of equivalent lines Head

- Number of lines Body- Number of lines Tail -Number of lines Total number of lines in notice

COMPUTATION OF CHARGES 126.0 lines 2.0 columns wide equals 252.0 equivalent lines at .446
cents per line Additional charge for notices containing rule and figure work (50 per cent of above amount) Charges for extra proofs of publication ($1.00 for each proof in excess of two) TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIM

DATA FOR COMPUTING COST Width of single column 5.8 ems Number of insertions __LQ Size of type 

### 1**$~~--'-11'-"2=.3""9**

.00**$._~--'-'** "'12=.3'-"-9

Pursuant to the provisions and penalties ofiC 5-11-10-1, I hereby certify that the foregoing account is just and correct, that the amount claimed is legally due, after allowing all just credits, and that no part of the same has been paid.

I also certify that 1;he printed matter attached hereto is a true copy, of the same column width and type size, which was duly published 

### in said paper I times. The dates of publication being between the dates of:

10/29/2010 and 10/29/2010

Additionally, the statement checked below is true and correct:

_. Newspaper does not have a Web site

. .,/ Newspaper has a Web site and this public notice was posted on the same day as it was published in the newspaper _Newspaper has a Web site, but due to a technical problem or error, public notice was posted**on~~--­** -Newspaper has a Web site but refuses to post the public notice.

DATE: 10/29/2010 Title: Clerk

# p L 

# E
A 

# s E INDIANAPOLIS STAR AND NEWS, INDIANAPOLIS, IN



# LEGAL ADVERTISING

An invoice for this ad will bt:! sent at the end of the month. Please forward this ad to person responsible for payment.



## AMOUNT$ \ 

# \J-. .?:::,9.

TO INSURE PROPER CREDIT RETURN THIS FORM WITH REMITTANCE THANK YOU INDIANAPOLIS NEWSPAPERS

## w 

## a: w I 1- 

## z w 2 

## w (f) 

### i= 

## a: w 

# > 0 <(
LL 

### 0


# >- 0... 

### 0 0
I 0

# ~ Prescribed by State Board of Accounts

# Gener~~o~(N~J£ (Rev. 2DD9A)


# The Journal Gazette

Allen County, Indiana Account# 1060944-858813


### lnd Dept Of Environmental Mgmt



### PUBLISHER'S CLAIM-·:··----·

-

LINE COUNT Display Master (Must no.t exceed two actual linf.Either of which shall
total more than four solid lines of the ty ·

### ~h iftem¥ of the
advertisement is set)

-- number of equi

## le~/Jl) . ___ 

### \!}

Head

-- number of lines 

### YJ ---['.) Body-- number of lines ---C Tail

-- number of lines

Total number of lines in notice

COMPUTATION OF CHARGES

178 lines, 

# 1 column(s) wide equ 178 equivalent lines at 

## $ 0.371

Additional charges for notices containing ru 

### {50 per cent of above amount)

Charge for extra proofs of publication 

### ($1.00 for each proof in excess of two)

TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIM

DATA FOR COMPUTING COST
Width of single column in picas

.... 9.8 Size of type

.... ?point.
Number. of Insertions

.... 1 178



## $ 66.04

66.04

Pursuant to the provisions and penalties of IC 

### 5-11-1 0-1, I hereby certify that the foregoing

account is just and correct, that the amount claimed is legally due, after allowing all just credits,
and that no part of the same has been paid.

I also certify that the printed matter attached hereto is a true copy, of the same column width

. and type size, which was duly published in said paper 1 times.

The dates of publication being as follows:

10/20/2010

Additionally, Newspaper has a Web site and this public notice was posted on the same day as it

was published in The Journai Gazette.

Date: 

### October 20, 2010 T. Brown-Smith Legal Clerkl1iii;::0:UJ1i"'<i§<i]01i•i•,!!.5"]'0:1lBMClaimNo.WarrantNo.---,,.·;----..INFAVOROF$:..eONACCOUNTOFApproprlatlonNo._____________________,INTHESUMOF$_________Ihaveexaminedthewithincl_aitnandherebycertifyasfollows:ThatitisInproperform.ThalliIsdulyauthenticatedasrequiredbylaw.Thall\isbaseduponstatutoryauthority.correctThat1tIsapparentlyIncorrectIcel'l.lfythatthewithinclaim1.3trueandcorrect;thattheserVicesthereInItemizedand_lorwhichctiargeIsmadewereorderedbymeandwerenecessarytothepublicbusiness

### THE JOURNAL GAZETTE, FT. WAYNE, IN

Le[al Notice of Public Hearing**Und~r** 40 CFR 5Ll02 notice is hereby given that the Indiana Air Pollution ' Control Board (board) will hold public hearirgs at its regularly scheduled meettng_on WednesCiay, December 1 2010. The meeting wtll convene 

### ai 1:00 p.m. ilt the Indiana Government Center-South, Conference Room C 402. West Washington Street. Indian: apol[s, ln9tana. The. purpose of the heanngs ts to recetve public com- ments prior to the proposed actions All interested persons are invited and will be given reasonable oppqrtunity to express their views concerning the proposed actions.
Copies of the draft and proposed ruleS
are available to any person upon re- quest and are available for pub I ic inspect!on at the following locations:

Indiana Department of Environmental f>4anagement, Office of Air Quality lndtana Government Center-North, 

### 'J.oo North Senate Avenue, lOth floor-East wing, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204.
Legislative Services Agencv, Indiana Government**Center-North~** 100 North Senate Avenue, Room NL:Ol, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204.

Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Northwest Office, 8380 Louisiana Street, Merrillville., Indiana 46410.

Indiana Department of Environmental Manag_ement, Northern Office, Suite 450, 300 N. -Michigan Street, South Bend, Indiana 46601.

Indiana Department of Environmental**Mana~ent,** Southwest OfficeA 1120 North Vincennes Avenue, P.u. Box 12Bh Petersburg, Indiana 47567- 012o.

Indiana Department of Environmental Management Southeast Office, 820 West Sweet Street, Brownstown, Indi-
ana 47220-9557.
Indianapolis Central Library, 40 £ast St. Clair Street, Indianapolis Indiana ft6204.

.
Hammond Public library, 564 State Street, Hammond, Indiana 46320.

Allen County Public library, 900 li-**~~8&2_Piaza,** Fort Wayne, Indiana

Evansville Vanderburgh Public Library, 200 SE Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Evansville, Indiana 47713.

Board documents may be viewed and downloaded from the Indiana Department of Environmental Management's Web site as early as one week prior to the meeting at http://www. m.gov/idem/4 710. htm.

The following rules are noticed for hearing and action: N02 and S02 Standards {LSA #10- 495). The purpose of this hearing is to receiVe publtc comment on amendments to 326 lAC 1-3-4 that is proposed for adoption by the board. This draft rule amends the national ambient air**quali~** standards for nitrogen**?J~~1~** (N? ) and sulfur dioxide

For additional information concern· ing this rule contact Manda Clevenger at the Indiana Department of Environ· mental**Mana~ment\** Office of Air Quality, Room-1003 .ndiana Government Center North, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis at (317)232·8229 Of (800)451·6027 {ext.- 2-8229)(in Indiana}, or mc\eveng@idem.in.gov.

Greenhouse Gas Tailoring {lSA #10-- 505), The purpose of th1s hearing is to receivepubhc comment on amendments to 326 lAC 2, concerning the prevention of significant deterioration and Title V greenhouse gas tailoring rule that are {lroposed for adoption by the board. This draft rule amends language in the permitting rules to en- sure greenhouse gases are regulated at the appropriate ttv-esholds.

For additional information concern- ing this rule contact Susan Bern at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Qualitv, Room 1003 Indiana Government "Center North, !00 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis at (317) 233- 5697 or (800)451-6027 (ext. 3- 5697)(in Indiana), or sbem@idem.in.gov.
Compliance Monitoring (LSA#05- 330). The purpose of this hearing is to receive publ1c comment on amendments to 326 lAC 3, concerning com- pliance monitoring requirements. that
IS proposed for preliminary adoption by the board. The draft rule clarifies and updates compliance monitoring rule _language and streamlines certain requirements.

For additional information concern· ing this rule contact Susan Bern at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Qualitv, Room 1003l Indiana Government Center North, 00 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis at (317) 233- 5697 or (800)451-6027 (ext. 3- 5697)(in Indiana}, or sbem@idem.in.gov.

For these hearings, oral statements will be heard\ but for the accuracy of the record pease submit statements in writing fo the attendant designated to receive written comments at the public hearing_

A transcript of the hearings and all written submissions to the board at the public- hearings shall be open to public Inspection at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management; copies may be made available to any person URQn payment of reproduction costs. Any person heard 6r represented at the hearing or requestjog notice shall be given written no- tice of the action of the board.

Christine Pedersen, Chief Rule and State Implementation Plan Development Section

### "'*******9l1if!-*~t£-1~Rli'!~~******** Individuals req_uiring reasonable ac- commodations for participation in this event should contact the Indiana Department of Environmental Manage-**men~** Americans with Disabilities Act cooroinator at:

Attn: ADA Coordinator Indiana Department of Environmental Management 100 N. Senate Avenue Indianapolis, IN 46204

or call (317} 233-1785. Speech and hearing impaired callers may contact the agency via the Indiana Relay Service at l-800-743-3333. Please pro-**vid~** a minimum of 72 hours= notificatmn. 10-20 858813

### A
T 

### T !'\ 

## c H Prescribed by State Board of Accounts



# ... JD.f./1L

...... . (Governmental Unrl)

ClARK County, Indiana To. THE EVENING NEWS
221 SPRING STREET JEFFERSONVILLE, IN 47130

PUBLISHER'S CLAIM General Fonn No. 99P (Rev. 2009A)



### C UNECOUNT 

### 0 p y



### 0
F

A 

### D


## v E
R 

### I


# s E 

### M



# •• T



### H E
R E

. -.,; Display Master (Must not exceed two actual lines, neither of which shall total more than four sofid lines of the type in which the body of the advertisement is set)- number of equivalent lines Head

- number of lines Body- number of lines Tail-- number of Jines Total number of lines in notice

COMPUT:'\JION OF CHARGES

. 

### 0/1

. . 

### ;JOy lines,

.... ./.

... columns wtde equalsd-

... :;eqwvalent lrnes at 

### "'.;1.4 

## 9 6 

# :::::;;ro::r:::::: 

# :dJ.av:::::::

cents per line

-------------------------------------------------------------- Additional charges for notices containing rule or tabular work (50 per cent of above amount}

______ ----

____ ---

_ -------

__ -----

_________________________ _ Charge for extra proofs of publication ($1.00 for each proof in excess oftNo)

----------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIM

DATA FOR COMPUTING COST
Width of single column in picas

............. . Number of insertions

........ /.

................. . Size of type

... 

## 7.

.... point.

Pursuant to the provisions and penalties of IC 5-11-10-1, I hereby certify that the foregoing account is just and correct, that the amount claimed is legally due, after allowing all just credits, and that no part of the same has been paid

.

I also certify that the printed maHer attached hereto is a true copy, of the same colunm vvidth and type size, which was duly published in said paper

............. /

......... times. The dates of publication being as follows:



# ...........................................**lJ.~** 

# ... d.-:.C/f

.. d.

.. 

# ata

................................. .

Additionally, the statement checked below is true and correct:

...... Newspaper does not have a Web site

.



# . Z Newspaper has a Web site and this public notice was posted on the same day as it was published in the newspaper. $

$

Newspaper has a Web site, but due to technicaf·problem or error, public notice was posted on

....... Newpaper has a Web s1te but refuses to post the public notice.

# ····~·~····················
Date

........

# ..JO.Jl.~irJ. 

# ....... .. , Legal Clerk



# or,s :J 

# .s-vc. r"'ziiiIw'"•"o1":1li.6}"o:1l..ClaimNo.WarrantNo.------INFAVOROF$.____ONACCOUNTOFAPPROPRIATIONFORAppropriationNo.ALLOWED_____.:.________,INTHESUMOF$.____.:1haveexaminedthewithinclaimandherebycertifyasfollows:Thatitisinproperform.ThatitIsdulyauthenticatedasrequire-dbylaw.ThatIIIsbaseduponstatutoryauthority.correctThatitis·apparentlyIncorrectrcertifythatthewithinclaimIstrueandcorrect;thattheservicesthereinJteml:zedandforwhichchargeIsmadewereorderedbymeandwerenecessarytothepublicbusiness-------·-

### CLARK COUNTY EVENING NEWS, JEFFERSONVILLE, IN

LEGAL NOTICE of

Public Hearing Under 40 CFR 51.102 notice is hereby given that the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board (board) will hold public hearings at its regularly scheduled meeting on Wednesday, December 1, 2010. The rreeting will
convene at 1:00 p.m. at the Indiana Government Center-South, Conference Room C, 402 West Washington Street, Indianapolis, Indiana. The
purpose of the hearings is to receive public com- ments prior to the proposed actions. All interested persons are invited and will be given reasonable opportunity to express their views concerning the proposed actions. Copies of the draft and proposed rules are available to any person upon request and are available lor public inspection at the following locations: Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center-North, 100 North Senate Ave-.
nue, 10th floor-East wing, Indianapolis, Indiana**~6?_94, -~gislative**  Serv-

. ices Agency, Indiana Government CenterNorth, 100 North Senate. Avenue, Room N201,'1n-· dianapolis, Indiana 46204. Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Northwest Office, 8380 Louisiana Street, Merrillville, ll'ldiana 46410. Indiana Department or Environmental Management, Northern Office, Suite 450, 300 N. Michigan Street, South Bend, Indiana 46601. Indiana Department of Environmental Management, So!l!h\.mst Offi.;e, 1120 North Vincennes Avenue, P.O. Box 128, Petersburg, Indiana: 47567-0128. Indiana De-i partment of Environmen-

, tal Management, Southeast Office, 820 West: Sweet Street, Brownstown, Indiana 47220- 9557. Indianapolis Central Library, 40 East St. Clair Street, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. Hammond Public Library, 564 State Street, Hammond, lm;liana 46320. Allen Countx Public Library'; 900 Library Plaza, Fort 

### wayne. :nota;;a 4.tBG2.';-- Evansville Vanderburgh Public Library, 200 SE Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Evansville, Indiana 47713. Board documents may be viewed and downloaded from the Indiana Department of Environmental Management's Web site as early

as one week prior to the meet.ing at

· http:!/www.in.gov/idernf4

710.htm. The following rules are noticed for hearing and action: N02 and S02 Standards {LSA #10-495). The pur-

. pose of**thi~** hearing is to

i-eceive public coriiment

on amendments to 326 lAC 1-3-4 that is proposed for adoption by the board. This draft rule amends the national ambient air quality standards for nilrogen dioxide (N02) and sulfur dioxide (S02). For additional information concerning this rule contact Manda Clevenger at the Indiana Department or Environmental Management, Office

or Air Quality, Room 1003, Indiana Government Center North, 100 North Senate Avenue,**In~** dianapolis .at {317) 232- 8229 or (800) 451-6027 (ext. 2-8229)(in Indiana), ormcleveng @idem.in.gov Greenhouse Gas Tailoring (LSA N--1 0-505). The

. purpose of this hearing is
to receive public comment on amendments to 326 lAC 2, concerning the prevention of significant deterioration and TItle V greenhouse gas tailoring rule that are proposed for adoption by the board. This draft rule amends language in the · permitting rules to ensure greenhouse gases are regulated at the appropriate thresholds. For additional information con-

. cerning this rule contact Susan Bern at the lndi-

- ana Department of EnVi-· ronmental Management, Office of Air Qualily, Room 1003, Indiana Government Center North, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis at (317)**233~5697** or (800) 451-6027 (ext. 3-S697)(in Indiana). or sbem@idem.in.gov. Compliance Monitoring (LSA605-33D). The purpose of this hearing IS to receive public comment

on amer\dments to 326 lAC 3, concerning compliance monitoring requirements that is proposed for preliminary adoption by the board. The draft rule clarifies and updates compliance monitoiing rule language and streamlines certain reQuirements. For additional information con- cerning this rule contact Susan Bern al the lridfana Department of Environmental Management, Office oi Air Quality, Room 1003, Indiana Government Center North, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis at (317)**233~5697** or (BOO) 451-6027 (ext. 3-5697)(in Indiana). or sbem@idem.in.gov. For these hearings, oral statements will be heard, but for the accuracy of the record, please submit statements in writing to the attendant designated
to receive written comments at lhe public hearing. A transcript of the hearings and all written submiao,ions to lile IJOard
at the public hearings shall be open to public inspeclion at the Indiana Deoarlf11enl or Environmental Management; copies may be made available to any person upon payment of reproduction costs. Any person heard or represented at the hearing or requesting notice shall be given written notice of the action of the board. Christine Pedersen, Chief Rule and State Implementation Plan Development Section Office of Air Quality Individuals requiring reasonable accommodations for participation in this event should contact the Indiana._ OepartrrieQt of Environriientat Ma:nag_ement, Americans with Disabilities Act coordinator at: Attn: ADA Coordinator Indiana**De~** partment of Environmental Management 100 N. Senate Avenue Indianapolis, IN 46204 or call (317) 233-1785. Speech and hearing impaired callers may contact the agency via the Indiana Relay Service at 1-B00- 743-3333. Please provide



### . a minimum of 72 hours= iiotificalion.

## .A
CH

CO•·: 

## PY\

OF 

## AD


## VE

RTI 

## SE

M 

## EN

T


### HE 

## RE Prescribed by State Board of Accounts <i
General Form No. 99P (Rev. 2009A) 

# ;Dr**~**



# .................. &.IJ:f

........................ . To: The Times Media Company
(Governmental Unit)

Lake County, Indiana 601-45th Avenue, Munster, IN 46321



### PUBLISHER'S CLAIM

LINE COUNT Display Master (Must not exce_ed two actual lines, neither of which shall total more than four solid lines of the type in which the body of the
advertisement is set)- number of equivalent lines
Head

-- number of lines Body- number of lines
Tail-- number of lines**-_-_-_-:_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_ti~~~=-:~-_?._'f~---:--:·· ~-.:~:-**  

### ............ . '' \ \

- _·_**~--)** ·t

.. ···
.. ···--······-- Total number of lines in notice

---- ---------------------- ';:-,-- -;- ::-_..,._., =-:--- .·::::: •.•••..•....••••.•....

COMPIJTAJ;ION OF CHARGES 

# /I_,-**/~-~ines,** ... 

## J

.... columns wide equals

.......

## ~uivalent lines at 35.4 cents per line

____________________________________________________________________ . 

# 57-IJ
$

...................... .. Additional charges for notices containing rule or tabular work (50 per cent of above amount)

____ --------

_______ ----------

__________________ ------ Charge for extra proofs of publication ($1.00 for each proof in excess of two) TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIM

DATA FOR COMPUTING COST Width of single column in picas 9p4
Number of insertions 1 Size of type 7.0 point. $ 

# :::o..::7Y.J:

#- 

# dD3'/7j'J(:,

Pursuant to the provisions and penalties of IC 5-11-10-1, I hereby certify that the foregoing account is just and correct, that the amount claimed is legally due, after allowing all just credits, and that no part of the same has been paid.

I also certify that the printed matter attached hereto is a true copy, of the same column width and type size;

Which was -duly.

# pu~lished_i_no~k~e ...

# Tii:e.sozo;obei.ng-as.f~llo~s~ .. ···-·- --·.

Additionally, the statement checked below is true and correct:

...... Newspaper does not have a Web site

.

.. X

.. Newspaper has a Web site and this public notice was posted on the same day as it was published in
the newspaper. Newspaper has a Web site, but due to technical problem or error, public notice was posted on

............... .

... . .. Newspaper has a Web site but refuses to post the public notice.

Kate Stephen

.........**~. ~/;~~** 

Title: Legal Clerk\'!iii;::"':5,11,cc§§"'0.!l"'"'..]:••,s••>]"]''0:1:"'••"'ClaimNo.WarrantNo.------INFAVOROF$____ONACCOUNTOFFORTheTimesMediaCompany·601W.45thAvenue,Munster,IN.46321AppropriationNo.-:-,"'ALLOWED.•,..•INTHESUMOF$,_____IhaveexaminedLhewithinclaimandherebycertifya;follows:'J:hatitisinproperform.ThatItIsdulyauthenticatedasrequiredbylaw.ThatItisbaseduponstatutoryauthority.correctThatitisapparentlyIncorrectIcertifythatthewithinclaimIstrueandcorrect;thattheservIcesthereinitemizedandforwhichchargeismadewereorderedbymeandwerenecessarytothepublicbusiness

### THE TIMES MEDIA COMPANY, MUNSTER, IN

legal Notice of Public Hearing ''"' 

## I Under 40 CFR 51.102 nolice 

### IS. 

# I hereby given that the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board (board) wiH-**~** hold public**hea~ngs** at its**regula~ly,..** 1 scheduled meet1ng on WednesdaY,:
1**D~cember** 1, 2010. The meeting'·,_ 

# I . Wllt convene at 1:00 p.m. at the**lndi~** .. 

### <

ana Government Center-South';•> Conference Room C, 402**We~>**

,**~ashington** Street, lndianaporrs,**ln-.~;(_** 1**~1ana. Th~** **purpo~e** of the hearin:Qs:;

. IS to rece1ve publrc comments priot'
to the proposed actions. All inter- <I ested persons are invited and will be given reasonable opportunity tO
express their views concerning thB-'- proposed actions. : Copies of the draft and propo,Se1i rules are available to any perSPO upon request and are available ·tat. ! public inspection at the following rO-

- cations:
I

- Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air' : Quality, Indiana Governmentl' Center-North, 100 North Senate Av--

,_ enue, 10th floor-East wing Indian-

.... ·. apolis, Indiana 46204. ' ·**~** -Legislative Services Agency, lndh.

ana Government Center-North,**100~ No~Jh**  Senale Avenue, Room N201,: Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. _--;

- Indiana Department of Environ- : ·; mental Management, Northwest Of-_,, flee, 8380 Louisiana Street Merrillville, lndiana46410. '

- Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Northern Office, Suite 450, 300 N. Michigan ! Street, South Bend, Indiana 46601.

- Indiana Department of Environ-. mental Management, Southwest QF fice, 1120 North Vincennes Avenue P.O. Box 128, Petersburg, lr.diarici 47567-0128.

- Indiana Department of Environ-;·--

... mental Management, Southeast Of-

. lice, B20 West Sweet Street Brownstown, Indiana 47220-9557: -In- ' dianapolis Central Library, 40 East-' St. Clair Street, Indianapolis, lndiarl£: 46204. ";'**~** Hammond Public Library, 564::: State Street, Hammond,**Indiana;~** 46320 •"·**~ All~n**  COunty Public Library, 

### sdO library Plaza, Fort Wayne, lndiaq_<jf 46802.**~;;,**

-Evansville Vandetburgh Public**l}f~.** brary, 200 SE Martin Luther King Jr Blvd., Evansville, Indiana 47713. 

## f.

Board documents may be viewe

.. and downloaded from the Indian**:~** Department of Environmenta' Management's Web site as early**~~** one week prior to the meeting at http·Uwww jn gow'jdemf4710 btm. ''j: The following rules are noticed**fo_~** hearing and action: •

N02 and S02 Standards (LSA, #-1{)-495). The purpose of this hear- ' ing is to receive public comment 0

_ • amendments to 326 lAC 1·3-4 lha, is proposed lor adoption by th board. This draft rule amends lh ': national ambient air quality stand- -rt ards for oitrogen dioxide (N02) and sulfur dioxide (S02). · -''

For additional intormatiQn concern )hg this rul.e · contact Mand _,_.qevenger at the Indiana Depart- ·;., ;ment 6f Environmental Manage-**.!fr~** "ment, OHice of ·Air Quality,**Room_~.**

1003, Indiana Government Center, North, 100 North Senate**Avenue~"'** Indianapolis at (317) 232-8229 oi".,. (800) 451-6027 {ext. 2-8229)(in In-_

... ,_;, diana), or mdeveng@!dem jn gnilii';.t>

Greenhouse Gas Tailoring**(L~A-: ,**  #-10-505). The purpose of this hear-"'-'·,-. ing is to receive public comment on·' amendments to 326 lAC 2, ceroing the prevention of r delerioration and Title V gas tailoring rule that for adoption by the draft rule amends language in permitting rules to ensure greenhouse gases are regulated at appropriate thresholds.

For additional information colnC<""' l
rule contact5534701

·:, ·. · Prescnbed bY State Board of Accounts General Form No. 99P (Rev. 2009A)

ATTACH

COPY OF
CUPPING

HERE Xl16 Indiana Dept of Environmental Mgmt To

___**E=V-"A'-"N"'S"-V'-'l=L=LE~C=O=U'-'R"'IE 00** **R_,_&=P_:_Ro:oE,-,Sc:Sc__~** (Governmental Unit)

YANDERBURGH County, Indiana PO Box 26.8, Evansville, IN 47702



### PUBLISHER'S

# CLAir[JI>~@

LINE COUNT Display Master (Must not exceed two actual lines, neither of which shall total more !han four solid lines of !he type in which_ the body of the adveftisemeht is set)

- number of equiv"alent lineS

__ - 332 Head -number of lines 0 Body

- number of lines 332 Tail- number of'lines 0 Total number of lines in notice 332

COMPUTATION OF CHARGES

· ·1"66 lines, 2 columns wide equals
cents per line Additional charges for notices containing rule ortat>ulilr vmrkof above amount)

. _ Charge for extra_proofs of publication ($1.00 for eaCh proof-irl-exCe:SS**cl~** . . .

TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIM $ 73.57

DATA FOR COMPUTING COST' _Width of siilgle Column -_in picps 5p8

. Siie of type

_ _:7,__point

_**N~:Jr1_1ber** of insertions· ·1

. .

. Pursuant to the provisions and penalties of IC 5-11-10.:1, I hereby certify that the-foregoing account is just and COI):ecl, tha!lhe amount claimed is legally due, after alloWing all jgst credtts, arid that no part of the same has been paid. · · ·

I also certify that the printed matter attached hereto is a true copy, of !he same, column width arid type size, which was duly published in Siiid ·paper 1

. times.'·. The**d~t~s** of publication being**~s** follows:

. October 20, 2010
;:'·

-0

. ·.

### hjditio~ly, the statement checked below is true and correct:**--~** -

-' )J) <i I Newspaper· does not have a Web site.**~** X>- 

### §£ Newspaper has a Web site_ and this public nqtice was_ posted on_the same daY 

## as it was published· in the newspaper.

- · · · · · · -

_,.:Err·

_ _,o;:·,_._Newspaper has a Web site, but due to technical problem or error, public notice was posted on

...... 

### m**~** h -""'"--'<--tc.::__Newspaper has a Web site but refuses to post t

. e public notice.

Date 1111/10 Title

_

# ~ Accounting Clerk

· ATIACHCOPY

. · OF ADVERTISEMENT
HERE I

I 

## I " 1i',!·'!'·"'i=a:UJ·">·.·o<,;·::;:.'·j"'$•j-0ss··...QIl'·:aa......5.ll"0>'Q..Jlnr·,.4:r,:,I)ClaimNo.WarrantNo,--'---INFAVOROF.ONACCQUNTOFAPPF{OPRIATIONFOR._c:,....,:,.......:.,-___:_.INTHESUMOF$•,;.·.·o,\.1':1>·_-.--•.'f<f,Ihavethewithinclaimandherebycertifyas..follows:Thatitls.:lnproperform.ThatitIsdulyauthenticatedasrequiredbylaw.Isbaseduponstatutoryauthority...··""·correcttitisapparen'tly.·Incorrect:ifythatthe·withinclah)1/strueandCorrect;thatthe.:e;erv-..·nuem!zedandforWhichchai"ge,Is.madewereWerenecessal)'publicbusltie.Ss_...,.<

### EVANSVILLE COURIER AND PRESS, EVANSVILLE, IN

Greenhouse Gas Tailoring (LSA #10- 505). The purpose of this hearing is to receive public comment on amend-

. ments to 326 lAC 2. concerning the pre-.-

.. vention of significant deterioration andi**~­** Title V greenhouse gas tailoring Yule '.,' thatare_proposed for adoption by the**.,,~i** board. This draft rule amends**language-~** in the permitting rules to**ensure_green~;{­** ho_use gases are**regulat~d** at the·appro:/\ pnate thresholds. "\ For additional information concerning • ;: this rule contact Susan Bern at the In- ·-.: diana Department of Environmental·**·--~,** Management, Office of Air Quality,**-~ ~·**  Room 1003,1ri_diana Government**Cent~r:~i** North, 100 North Senate Avenue, In- ':y_; dianapolis at {317}233-5697 or

.**·-y.~** (800}451-6027 (ext. 3-5697)(in**Indiana),·->:~** or sbem@idem.in.gov. · ·- Compliance Monitoring {LSA#OS-330).

### ·.~Ji The purj:Jose of this hearing is to**receiye!~** .. publiC comment on amencfments to**32S:~** lAC 3. concerning compliance**monitor.;'~':'!** ing requirements that IS proposed for**''·-:_!~;** prelimmary adoption by the board.**Tht~~,~;** draft ru'fe clarifies and updates compli-: ·'·

ance monitoring rule language and · · ·· streamlines certain requirements. · ::;: For additional illformation concerning· this rule contact Susan Sem'at -the In-·**-.~** diana !npartment of Environmental**;·~** Management Office of Air Quality, _.· '-: Room 1003, Indiana Government Cente.r:i Nortt-i, 100 North Senate Avenue, in- · ';:. dianapolis at (317) 233-5697 or 1800) 451-6027 (ext. 3-5697)(in Indiana),

or sbem@idem.ln.gov. ·.,,_;

For these hearings, oral statements

### wiuf~ be heard, but for the accuracy Of the ' 1 \,1-; record, please submit statements in ; '/ writing to the attendant designated to· _ri_; receive written comments at the**pUbliC~!-'** hearing.

. _:·J1l A transcript of the hearings and all**w~it~** ten submissions to the board at the**P!-ib!;~** lie hearings shall- be open to public in-_**~r,.** : spectioti at the Indiana Department of ;:J&
' Environmental Management;.coP.ies**.>~J'i**

may be made available to any pei-sqn ""•;],'

, upon payment ofreproduction costs

.. 

## :::z,

Any person heard or represented at thev:**heanng~r** requesting notice shall be

_ ·-':). given written notice of the action**oft~¢:"':_** .. ' board.

.,, Christine Pedersen, Chief

- :;;;- Rule and State Implementation Plan Dif·;:**velopm~nt** Section

.., ..**:~** Office of Air Quality

..**::~--**

### •""'***;~*-tu-•••*""*****,.***''""'*•*"""*·~'t:**····*~****~** ........... ******+*5*•*1H"

...******•*f~'** ,.,,.,., .... .,.,._,__,. :··;•it Individuals requiring_ reasonable accorri.::'f modatio.ns for participation in this eventfshould contact the Indiana DepartmehtH.?{ of Environmental Manaa_ement,

, '·**;;~­** Americans with Disabilities Act**c:Oord1::~,;;_** nator at**·~'?j,:** Attn: ADA Coordinator ··'fi Indiana Department of**Environmental.'.(~** Management

.**'·1'·~** 100 N. Senate Avenue _-;\,; lndian<Qalis,IN 46204**.:~ _'**  or call (317}233-1785. Speech and**he~j-O·.ct_** ing impaired callers may contact the**'.J;~;l;** agency via the· Indiana Relay Service.**~g-~:** 1-800--743-3333. Please prov1de a mlnF,>J

mum of 72 hours: notification. ' ::\,l- (Courier & Press Oct 20, 20101 .·.:.r.J[,

### Publishers' Affidavits

Second Hearing

May4, 2011Prescribed by State Board of Accounts 

### 80315-5787868 Genera] Form No. 99P (Rev. 2009A)



### IND DEPT OF ENVJRONMENTAL MANA

MARION

. COUNTY, INDIANA To: INDIANAPOLIS NEWSPAPERS 307NPENNSYLVANIA ST- PO BOX 145 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46206-0145



### PUBLISHER'S CLAIM

LINE COUNT Display Matter- (Must not exceed two actual lines, neither of which shall total more than four solid lines of the type in which the body of the advertisement is set). -number of equivalent lines \ Head- Number of lines 

## !

. Body- Number oflines

; Tail- Number of lines 

# / Total number of lines in notice

COMPUTATION OF CHARGES 208.0 lines 2.0 columns wide equals 416.0 equivalent lines at .458

· cents per line Additional charge for notices containing rule and figure work (50 per cent of above amount) Charges for extra proofs of publication ($1.00 for each proof in excess of two) TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIM

DATA FOR COMPUTING COST Width of single colunm 5.8 ems Number of insertions 1.0 Size of type 

### 1 $

__ ____.19z:>o,.s,_,_3

.00 $.

__ -----'-'19,0_,_,.5"-3

Pursuant to the provisions and penalties ofiC 5-11-10-1, I hereby certify that the foregoing account is just and correct, thatthe amount claimed is·legal1y due, after allowing alljustcredits;aud thatno part of the same has been paid.

I also certifY that the printed matter attached hereto is a true copy, of the same colunm width and type size, which was duly published in said paper 1 times. The dates of publication being between the dates of:

03131/2011 and 03131/2011

Additionally, the statement checked below is true and correct:

_Newspaper does not have a Web site. ·?"'Newspaper has a Web site and this public notice was posted on the same day as it was published in the newspaper _Newspaper has a Web site, but due to a teclmical problem or error, public notice was posted on

___ _

_ Newspaper has a Web site but re:fuses to post the public notice.

DATE: 03/31/2011 Title: Clerk

# p 

# L E
A 

# s E LEGAL ADVERTISING

An invoice lor this ad will b\) sent at the end of the month. Please forward this ad to person responsible lor payment



## · ACCT#

# ~()~l5-**5'1<6'l.f£~~**

AMOUNT$ \

# ~G 

# ·S**~.** ' '

TO INSURE PROPER CREDIT RETURN THIS FORM WITH REMITTANCE THANK YOU INDIANAPOLIS NEWSPAPERS I,

### INDIANAPOLIS STAR AND NEWS, INDIANAPOLIS, IN

l.- Lepl No lice of Public Hearing f Under 40 CFR 51.102 notice is hereby giVeri; f.that the Indiana Air Po}!Utlon,Contn?**~oar~­** ; (board) will hold a pub he hearmg at •ts regU:: larly scheduled meeting on**Wedn~day,** May. 0 4, 2011. The**me~ting** will convene at l;DJV

· 'p m at the lnd•ana Government Centefo\1 !.sOuth conference Room c, 402 West Washf; fJngtor\ Street.**ln~ian.apolis,** Indiana. The Pl!rc2-**~pose** of the heanng IS to receive puJ?lic**t{)m-~** 'I rnents prior to the- propo;-ed**a.ct•on~:~_A:IJ\** interested persons are lnv1ted and Will 1;1<1;!-;**~:r~~~; v~a:~g~g~~ni~~ptm~~~o:~d** **:~~~l1J.** l•copies of tile Proposed rule are available' to'"

. 1 any person upon reqLrest and are**availabl~** . for public: Inspection at the following lop'!:.:· i**tlon~~dliinii ---~~partment**  of**Environm~~~'i:! ~!~~~':n~~~tc,?n~~N~~:;:rt~ou~lb~h** **~~~~'i~!** j :Avenue, lOth**floor~East** wing, Indianapolis, i

. Indiana 4620'1. · ;

. 1 - Le!Jislative services A8enc:y, lndlana_j

1**~~~~~mit~~~en~~r;r.o\i.~iingp~t~h ~~ar:~-i**  

## l

'46204.

. '

: Indiana o'jf.artment of Environmei-rtal j**~:~:~~~£tMe:!-HJ~~~~n~r:~~·4:1~8. Loui~**  :' Indiana Departinent of Environmentaij**~-a~flct~"'annt, ~fr~~rns~~~e·a~~d;** **i~~i~R~** · 46601- ; ;_ Indiana Department of Environmental Management, SOuthwest Office, 1120 North Vincennes Avenue, P.O. Box 128, Petersburg, Indiana 47567-0128.**Ma~~d~~;n~e§':~~::s\ ~~~i';f:fomWe~:\**  sweef street, Brownstown. Indiana 472207 i 9557. '

. Indianapolis Central Library, 40 East st. i j Clair Street, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. ' I**~** Hammond Public Library, S64 State i Street, Hammond, Indiana 46320. l Allen County PUblic Library, 900 Library ) Plaza, Fort Wayne, Indiana 46802. j

1 2oo**~V:'lfa~f** 

### ...**~~:~~Wgh Jr.u~~~~--t.~~a~r:**  

## i

ville, \ndiana47713.

____ :

· Board documents may be viewed and**doWn~.':] ~~~~gntilmM~nea~e~a:n'l·~eJJ~~~~t~** **;~~l;:~** as one week _prior to the meeting at htt,:i://www.m.gov/ldem/4710.htm. The following rule is noticed for hearing and' action: Greenhouse Gas Title V Clarification (LSA·; #11-BS). The purpose of this hearing is to. re-;_ i celve public comment on amendments to 3Z6':j lAC 2-7-1, concerninQ clarification ofthel'it\e;!**~~e.rrm~u~Jl~o~a~bo; rfft~~a~~~\h:** **~~~~1 f1~~ed** **r~~es a~gnd~r~t?d~agcl;~fi~tl~~r~~1** **g~~ri:\g,i_ng** of greenhouse gases In**l'ltle·:.:~~~'.~.** For additional information concernln_g: this rule contact SuSan Bern at the**lndia_Q~ 8¥K.;'r~i.,lr~f** **J~~\~~~~~~ N~~~~~~~'l.l>!**  Governmellt Center North, 100 North**Semi~~~** Avenue Indianapolis at (317) 233-5697'-,ot; (800}**4~1-60?-7** (ext. 3-569l)(in lndiana),JO'tJ sbem@•demJn.gov.

. , .**.;_~'­** Ethanol Plant Clarification (LSA#ll--99).**-l:h_e~** purpose of this hearing Is to receive**P!J~!!t'l** comment on amendments to 326 lAC 2.**co.;.~** cernlng ethanol plantS, that are proposed:fo:r:**~faWJ~~nth~ !f~a~~ap~Od~Jio~f~lfi~~s~:~**  e.Jr:Ciuded from the term uchemicaJ**ptOci!~** plants" in the major source c:ategory.**>~** For additional InformatiOn conc:ernln"g'' this rule contact AmY Smith at the**lndl~~a:j** Department of Environmental**Managemeil~** Office of Air· Quality, Room ·1003, lnd!oi.fi.]fl Government Center North, 100 North sen.afe;> Avenue Indianapolis at (3ln 233-8628 ·tifi (800) 451-6027 (ex.t. 3-S628)(in Indiana), o);' asmlth@ldem.ln.gov.

, -'-: Compliance Monitoring (LSA#05-3341). The purpose of this hearing Is to receive**publi~** comment on amendments to 326 lAC 3, corh.' cernlng compliance monitoring require": ments, that are proposed for final adoption· by the board. The proposed rule clarifies and. updates compliance monitoring rule JanS-i guage and streamlines certain requirements'.";; For additional i11formatlon concerniriiiJJ this rule contact Susan Bern at the India**gw:~r"!~~f QE~~.,~~~~~~~~** **n~~'-<i:~:ii,im~** Government**~enter** North, 100 North Senat Avenue, Indianapolis at (317) 233-5697**~t~~~fJ~~J~.J~~** 3-5697)(1n lndiaoa),**--~ ~** **r~~t:!.;rri~ ;!'fo~~~~** **~uJrce cb~~~;t·g~**  amendments to 326 lAC 2·1.1, 326 lAC 2-7•· 3261AC2-8, 326 lAC 2·9, 3261AC 2-12 and 326 lAC 2·13 concerning permit fees, that ·are'-**g~~~~~ie"0Jrfft~i~!n~a'ri~~~P!~n u~~at;-j**  permit fee lan51t1age and addS fees for _cer;tj tain woodwork111g operations.**'--~1** For additional information**c:oncemi~~~** this mle contact Amy Smith at the**lndfa~a'l gw:~~~r~~~t** **QEu":r\~~11~~~~ t'J~~~l~&i~**  

### l

Government Center North, 100 North Senate**t;~1u:S1 -~~k'tn(~~t~s** **3~Jd~f(l~ ~Ji:~~.-**  

### &f,j asmith@idem.ln.gov.**-~:~** Hospitai/Medical/lnfect,ious Waste lncin_er"-;-_;;**~~i!~~~~i~!l~·ut~i~ ~~~~seen~~~~~~'$**  ments to 326 lAC 11-6, concemin§·l hospital/medicaVinfectious waste**lnclnera~~** tprs. that are proposed for preliminary adop'='4.**~1o_n** by the board. The !1raft rule updates**elf~',** 1stm9 rules ·for c:ons1stem;y with**federal.~** requirements. ;;:_,o;

. For additional information**concemin·g~**

, th1s rule contact;Susan Bern at the**Indiana:'~**

·.**g~~f"li~f QEJhli~~~~~~~l** **~~~1~** 

### ·--·- Government Center North, 100 Nort**tavo"'o')u~Sl~~ka7n'f~ts 3:'-s\J?f(l~** **f~Ji** sbem@idem.in.gov.. -·-.'<'t

- Oi!en Bu!ninp (L5A#D?·362). The purpose'Ot**~~ e~dri;~';.~~st~** **3'; ~fil~** **.e~g~c~~~ e~~:f:** 

### ~~m~Pn~~~~~~wg~b~tt~**ab~lr~~~~e~~r,_orij** rule**~xempts c~rtain**  types of burning frorri, need1ng to obtalll ao approval and allows th¢' ceremonial burning of United States flags.·(.''' For additional information concerning· this role contact Susan Bern at the lndiii,Qa•**g~~~f"!i~f QE~\~;~~~~** **1 N~~~l~IJI~k**  Government Center North, 100 North Senate1**tSoeo)u~sl~tf(~~~s 3~69<Ncl~** **t~J~i~;J .::_g~~**  sbem@idem.in.gov. .- '._' _M For this hearing, oral statements will.-**be~** heard, but for the accuracy of the recoi"d please submit statements in' Writing to th' attendant designated to receive writl;_eh' comments at the public: hearing.**,.~,'** :, A transcript of the hearing and all written ;;;ubmissions to the board at the public hear-**:~g~:_~:llobe"'p~~~~ ~fb~iriv\ig~~~~a~~~**  agement; copies may be made**availablect~** any person upon payment of**reproductir:IO~­** costs. AfD' person heard or rer,tresented :a"iil the**hearln~** or requesting notice shall**b~ g~v:;a_**  written notice of the action of**t~P,ii** Christine Pedersen, Chlei_1:1 Rule and State Implementation**PlaQ~' o~~~fg}"'A'I~** **s~~~** 

## ........................................................ s

.....**~~,** Individuals requiring reasomi:ble**accomnl~** dations for participation in this event should ;**~~~filt ~in~g'!!~etP,eR;,'!~i~~s** **~!frhV1 ~~I~~_;i**  abilities Act coordinator at: ' _--] Attn: ADA Coordinator**··})/~** Indiana Department of Environmentali:**ro'lfW~~~i¥~ A~tenlle**  . : 

### .:\:!
Indianapolis. IN '15204**,if~''** or call 017) 233-1785. Speech and heariil'g impaired callers may contact the agency· VI the lndiana'Rela.Y Service at**1-800-743·3333~** Please provide a minimum of 12 hours= ClOtl· ficatlan. '

- •-;:r. (S. 3131/ll- 5787868) _.'.;&UJ 

## a: UJ If

## z UJ**~** UJ (J)f

## a: UJ 

## > 0 <l:
LL 0 

## >- 0.. 0 () I () <l:

# ~· Prescribed 

# w

1 . _Slate

__**B~o_a.u:toj_A~C:.9:Ylli!L** ______________**~-----···------·-:="1 ·~**  

### 1 

# !

.**R~ECf2I~~fffiJ** Jourhal Gazette 

# I

. l Genenil Form No. 99P

# ~ 

# '>\fo\ \\

(Rev. 2009A)



### l

## ~ 1**Mt~:** 

## 2 

# a**~'Jll** Account# 1060944

- 893053 Allen!County, Indiana ; ' I lnd Dept Of Environmental Mgmt 

### l State of Indjana j

1 Departfi1ent of Envircr.mentaf 

### t-·1anan;;:rp.IJJBtliSHER'S CLAIM

LINE

# botJNr~**o:''~:r "'~~:-~~'-":~**  

# L

.. J

Display Master (Must not exceed two actual lines, neither of which shall

total more than four solid lines of the type in which the body of the
advertisement is set)

-- number of equivalent lines
Hf'ad

-- number of lines

. Body-- number of lines

Tail-- number of lines

Total number of lines in notice

COMPUTATION OF CHARGES 

### 131 lines, 

## g column(s) wide equals 

### 262 equivalent lines at 

## $ 0.381 cents per line

Additional charges for notices containing rule or tabular work {50 per cent of above amount)

Charge for extra proofs of publication {$1.00 for each proof in excess of two)

TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIM

DATA FOR COMPUTING COST
Width of single column in picas

.... 9.8 Size of type

.... ?point.
Number of Insertions

.... 1 

### 262



## $ 99.82

49.91



### $ 149.73

Pursuant to the. provisions and penalties of IC 5-11-10-1, I hereby certify that the foregoing

account is just and correct, that the amount claimed is legally due, after allowing all just credits,
and that no part of the same has been paid.

I also certify that the printed matter attached hereto is a true copy, of the same column width

. and type size, which was duly published in said paper 1 times.

The dates of publication being as follqws:



### 3/19/2011

Additionally, Newspaper has.a Web site and this public notice was posit on the same day·**as~**
was published in The Journal Gazette. 

# 1 \**~&~**

Date: March 

### 19, 2011 T. Brown-Smith Legal Clerk"'z!!lwli.!!!iiJ,1"'j•"l•"£},E"'ClaimNo.WarrantNo.------INFAyOROF$ONACCOUNTOFAPPROPRINIONFORAppropriationNo.-------INTHESUMOF$.____Ihaveexaminedlhewithinclaimandherebycertifyasfollows:ThatIIIsInproperform.ThaiIIIsdulyauthen\lcaledasrequiredbylaw.ThaiitIsbaseduponsratutoryaurhorUy•correctThat11IsapparanUylncormclIcertifythattheWllhlnclaimIstrueandcorrect;thatlheserv·-IcesthereInItemizedandforwhiChchargeIsmadewere·orderedbymeandWerenecessarytothepublicbuslne!lslegal Notice of Public Hearing

Under 40 CFR 51.102 notice is hereby given that the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board (board) will hold a !;!Ublic hearing at its regularly scheduled meeting on Wednesday, May 4, 2011. The meeting will convene at 1:00 p.m. at**th~** Indiana Government Center-South, Conference Room C, 402 West Washmgton Street,**lndiana~lis,** Indiana. The purpose of the hearing is to receive public**commer~ts** prior to the proposed actions. All interested persons are invited and will be given reasonable opportunity to express their views concerning the proposed action.
Copies of the**pro~sed** rule are available to any person upon request and are available for public inspection at the following locations:

Indiana Department of Environmental**Mana~ment,** Office of Air Qualitytio- diana Government Center-Northb100 North Senate Avenue, lOth floor- ast wing, Indianapolis, Indiana 462 4. Legislative Services Ageng, Indiana Government Center-North, 100 North Senate Avenue, Room**~201.** Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. Indiana**D~artment** of Environmenta Mana_gement, Northwest Office, 8380 Louisiana Street, Merrillville" Indiana 46410. Indiana Department of Enwonmental Management. Northern Office, Suite 450,300 N. Michigan Street, South Bend, Indiana 46601. Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Southwest**Offic~** ll20 North Vincennes Avenue P.O. Box 128 Petersburg Indiana 47567-u128. Indiana Department of tnvironmental**Manqg_emen~** Southeast Office, 820**We~** Sweet Street, Brownstown Indiana**47220-95::~7.** Indianapolis Central Library, 40 East St. Clair Street, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. Hammond Public Library, 564 State Street, Hammond, Indiana 46320. Allen Countv Public Library, 900 Library Plaza Fort Wayne, Indiana 46802. Evansville Vanderburgh Public Library, 200 st. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Evansville, Indiana 47713.

Board documents may be viewed and downloaded from the Indiana Depart- ment of Environmental Management's Web site as early as one week prior to the meeting at http://www.in.gov/idem!47l0.htm.

The following rule is noticed for hearing and action: Greenhouse Gas Title V Clarification {LSA #11-85). The Rurpose of this hearing is to receive public comment on amendments to 326 lAC 2-7-1, con- cernin'i clarific:ation of the Title V _Ereenhouse gas tailoring rule, that are pro- posed or adoption by the board, The proposed rule amends language in the g_ermitting rules to provide clarification on permitting of greenhouse gases in T1tle V permits. For additional information concerning this rule contact Susan Bern at the Indiana DeBartment of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Room 10 3, Indiana Government Center North 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis at (317) 233-5697 or**(800J451~027** (elct. 3-5697Hin Indiana), or sbem@idem.m.gov.

Ethanol Plant Clarification (LSA#l1-99J. The purpose of this hearing is tore- ceive public comment on amendments to 326 lAC 2, concerning ethanol g_Jants. that are proposed for adoption by the board. The proposed rule clarities that ethanol production facilities are excluded from the term "chemical Q_rDCess P.lants" in the major source**cat~ory.** For additional information concerning th1s rule contact Amy Smith at the Indiana Desartment of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Room 10 3, Indiana Government Center Noith 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis at (317) 233-8628 or {800)451-6027 (ext. 3-8628){in Indiana), or asmith@idem.in.gov.

Compliance**Monitorin~** (LSA#-05-330). The puwose of this hearing is to re- ceive public commenf on amendments to 326 lAC 3 concerning compli-
ance monitoring requirements, that are prooosed for f'inal adoption by the board. The proposed _rule clanfies anQ updates compliance monitoring rule language and streamlmes certam reQUirements. For additional information concerning this rule contact Susan Bern at the Indiana DeBartment of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Room 10 3, Indiana Government Center North 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis at (317l 233-5697 or (800)451-6027 (ext. 3-5697)(in Indiana), or sbem@idem.ln.gov.

Permit Fees (LSA#07-286). The purpose of this hearing is to receive public comment on amendments to 326 lAC**2~1.1,** 326 lAC 2-7, 326 lAC 2-8 326 lAC 2-9, 326 lAC 2-12 and 3261AC 2-13 concerning permit tees, thaf
are proposed for preliminary adoption bv the board. The draft rule clarifies and updates permit fee language and adds fees for certain woodworking oper- ations. For additional information ""oncerning this rule contact Amy Smith at the Indiana DeBartment of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Room 10 3, Indiana Government Center North 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis at (317) 233-8628 or (800)451-6027 (ext. 3-8628)(in Indiana), or asmith@idem.in.gov.

HosP.italllv'ledical/lnfectious Waste Incinerators (LSA#10-733). The purpose of this hearing is to receive public comment on amendments to 326 lAC 11- 6, concerning hospital/medical/infectious waste incinerators, that are pro- posed for preliminary adoP.tion by the board. The draft rule updates existing rules for**consi~ency** with federal reQuirements. For additionalmformation concerning this rule contact Susan Bern at the Indiana Desartment of Environmental**Man~ement,** Office of Air Quality, Room 10 3, Indiana Government Center North 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis at (3171 233-5697 or (800)451-6027 (ext. 3-5697J{in Indiana), or sbem@idem.m.gov.Open Burning (LSA#09-362). The purpose of this hearing is to receive pub- IJc comment on amendments to 326 lAC 4, concerning open burning re- quirements, that are proposed for preliminary adoption oy the board. The draft rule exempts certain types of burning from needing to obta'm an appro- val and allows the ceremomat burning of United States flags. For additional information concerning this rule contact Susan Bern at the Indiana De8artment of Environmental Man;ogement. Office of Air Quality, Room 10 3, Indiana Government Center North 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis at (317) 233-5697 or·(B00)451-i>027 (ext. 3-5697l(in Indiana), or sbem@idem.ln.gov.

For this hearing, oral statements will be heard( but for the accuracy of therecord, please submit statements in writing to he attendant designated to re- ceive written comments at the public hearing.

A transcript of the hearing and all written submissions to the board at the public hearing shall be open to public inspection at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management; copies may be made available to any person upon payment of reproduction costs. Any person heard or represented at the hearing or reQuesting notice shall be given written notice of the action of the board.

Christine Pedersen, Chief Rule and State Implementation Plan Development Section Office of Air Quality

Individuals reQuiring reasonable accommodations for participation in this event should contact the Indiana Department of Environmental Manage- ment. Americans with Disabilities Act coordinator at:

Attn: ADA Coordinator Indiana Department of Environmental Management 100 N. Senate Avenue Indianapolis, IN 46204

or call (317) 233-1785. Speech and hearini)imBaired callers may contact**~73e a;~WZ~~~t~f** **j~d~~~~~e~~itT~a1i~~-** at -8 0-743-3333. Please prcr 3-19 893053

### A T



# c H 

# c 0 p 

### y 0 

### F 

### A D 

## v E R 

### T I 

# s E M 

### E
N 

### T H



### '' 

### E Prescribed by State Board of Accounts

LINE COUNT Display Master (Must not exceed two actual lines, neither of which shall total more than four solid lines of the type in which the body of the advertisement is set) --number of equivalent lines Head

-- number of lines Body

-- number of lines Tail

-- number of lines Total number of lines in notice 

### ···z3:r:

.. ·

...... !.2**CO~j.UjATION~CHARGES** . 

# f/IJ

. . . 2 'Jlf /

.......... hnes,

.......... columns w1de equals

.... 

# 6 equ1valent hnes

### at-~---·-··{? 

## f

cents per line $ 

# /cd

..**:.~CI.** Additional charges 

### for-rl0tiC8S-C0rit8lrlil-iQ- 

### iUr8-0rt3bU!ar WQfk (56 

## -p8r-Cerlt----------

--------------- of above amount)

_________________________________________________________________ . Charge for extra proofs of publication ($1.00 for each proof in excess of two) ToTAL 

### AKifoi:fNt-oF- cLA"iliA--------

----------------------------------------------- · f:v·3o··· $ 

### /tJG

.. <.

............ .

DATA FOR COMPUTING COST Width of single column in picas

...... 

## _(e Size of type

.. 

## .7

.. point.
Number of insertions

.............. /

Pursuant to the provisions and penalties of IC 5-11-1 0-1, I hereby certify that the foregoing account is just and correct, that the amount claimed is legally due, after allowing all just credits, and that no part of the same has been paid.

I also certify that the printed matter attached hereto is a true copy, of the same colunm width and type size, which was duly published in said paper

......... ;.

............ times. The dates of publication being as follows:



# ············
..........**-1~.:?:9-J!**

Additionally, the statement checked below is true and correct:

.... . _...-Newspaper does not have a Web site

.

.**~-** Newspaper has a Web site and this public notice was posted on the same day as it was published in the newspaper.

__ Newspaper has a Web site, but due .o technical problem or error, public notice was posted on

.....

. . . . . . Newpaper has a Web site but refuses to post the public notice.



# ''-!-11
Date

....**~** .......................................... ,. Legal Clerkw"l'5<(0"2rns:§"'B'5.rn.E2}0...c2JlClaimNo.----·WarrantNo.------INFAVOROF$_____ONACCOUNTOFAPPROPRIATIOI\JFOR.r,ppropr1ationNo.ALLOWEDINTHESUMOF$____Ihaveexaminedtl1eWithinclaimandherebycertifyasfollows:Thatilisinproperform.ThatItisdulyauthenticatedasrequiredbylaw.Thati1isbaseduponstatutol)lauthorily.corrccr'Thatitisapparentlyincorrect'Icertifythatthewithinclainlisti'Lieandcorrect:ih<JItheserv-icesthereinitemizedandforwhichchargeismadeorderedbymeandwerenecessa1·ytotheoublicbL1slness('cd)··;-W©r./'//LEGAL NOTICE of Public Hearing

Un6**~r** 40 CFR 51.102 notice is hereby given that the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board (board) will hold a public hearing at its regularly scheduled meeting on Wednesday, May 4, 2011. The meeting will convene at 1:00 p.m. at the Indiana Government Center-South, Conference Room C, 402 West Washington Street, Indianapolis, Indiana. The purpose of tile hearing is to receive public comments pnor to the proposed actions. All interested
persons are invited and will be given reasonable opportunity to express their views concerning the proposed action.

Copies of the proposed rule are available to any person upon request and

are available for public inspection at the following locations: fndiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center-North, 100 North Sen
ate Avenue, 1oth floor-East wing, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204.

Legislative Services Agency, Indiana Government CenterNorth, 100 North Senate Avenue. Room N201, Indianapolis, In diana 46204.

Indiana Department of Environmental Management Northwest Office, 8380 Louisiana Street. Merrillville, Indiana 464 tO.

Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Northern Office, Suite 450, 300 N. Michigan Street, South Bend, Indiana 46601.

Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Southwest Office, 1120 North Vincennes Avenue, P.O. Box i2B, Peters burg, Indiana 47567-0128.

Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Southeast Office, 620 West Sweel Street, Brownstown, Indiana 47220- 9557.

Indianapolis Central Library. 40 East St. Clair Street,lndianapo lis, Indiana 46204.

Hammond Public Library. 564 State Street. Hammond, Indiana

. 46320.

Allen County Public Libra!)', 900 Library Plaza, Fort Wayne, In diana 46802.

Evansville Vanderburgh Public Library, 200 SE Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Evansville, Indiana 47713.

Board documents may be viewed and downloaded lrom the Indiana De· partment ol Environmental**Mana~ement's** Web site as early as one week prior to the meeting at http://www.ln.gov/idem/4710.hlm

.

The following rule is noticed for hearing and action: Greenhouse Gas Title V Clarification (LSA #11-85). The purpose of this hearing is to receive public comment on amendments to 326 lAC 2-7-1, concerning clarirication of the Title V greenhouse gas tailoring rule, !hal

are proposed for adoption by the board. The proposed rule amends language in the permitting rules to provide clarification on permilling of greenhouse gases in Title V permits.

For 8.dditional information concerning this rule contact Susan Bern at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management Office of Air Quality, Room 1003, Indiana Government Center North, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis at (317) 233-5697 or (BOO) 451-6027 (ext 3-5697)(in Indiana),

or sbem@idem.in.gov.

Elhanol Plant Clarification {LSA#11·99). The purpose o! lhis hearing**i~** to receive public comment on amendments to 326 lAC 2, concerning elhanol plants, that are proposed for adoption by !he board. The proposed rule clarifies that ethanol production facilities are excluded from the term**~chemical** process**plants~** in the major source calegol)'.

For addilional information concerning this rule contact Amy Smilh at the Indiana Department of Environmental Managemenl, Office of Air Quality, Room 1003,1ndiana Government Cenler North, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis at (317) 233-8628 or (BOO) 451-£027 (ext. 3-8628)(in Indiana),

or asmith@idem.in.gov.

Compliance Monitoring (LSAII05-330). The purpose of this hearing is to receive public comment on**art:~endments** to 326 lAC 3, concerning compli-

·ance monitoring requirements, that are proposed for final adoption by the board. The proposed rule clarifies and updates compliance monitoring rule language and streamlines certain requirements.

For additional inlormalion concerning this rule contact Susan Bern at the Indiana Department of Environmenlal Management, Office of Air Quality, Room 1003, Indiana Government Center North, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis al (317) 233-5697 or (BOO) 451-6027 (ext. 3-'5697)(in Indiana),

or sbem@idem.in.gov.

Permit Fees {LSA#I07-266). The purpose of this hearing is to receive public comment on amendments to 326 lAC 2-1.1, 326 .lAC 2-7,326 lAC 2-6, 326 lAC 2-9, 326 lAC 2-12 and 326 lAC 2-13 concerning permit lees, that are proposed for preliminary adoption by the board. The drafl rule darilles and updates permit fee language and adds fees for certain woodworking operations.

For additional information conceminQ this rule contact Amy Smith at the In-**dian:;~** Department of Environmentil Management, OffiCe of Air Quality.**Ro~m** 1003, Indiana Government Center North, 100 North Senate Avenue, lnd1. napolis at (317) 233-8628 or (800) 451-6027 (ext. 3-8628)(in Indiana).

or a smith @idem.in.gov.

Hospitai!MedicaVlnfectious Waste Incinerators (LSAit10-7J3)_ The purpose of this hearing is to receive public comment on amendments to 326 lAC 11-6, concerning hospitaVmedicallinlectious waste incinerators, that are proposed for prelinlinary adoption by the board. The draft rule updates existing rules for consistency with federal requirements.

For additional information concerning this rule contact Susan Bern at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Room 1003, Indiana Government Center North, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis at (31'Q 233-5697 or(BOO) 451-6027 (ext. 3-5697}(in Indiana),

or sbem@idem.in.gov.

Open Burning (LSA#09-J62}. The purpose of this hearing is to receive public comment on amendments to 326 lAC 4, concerning open Homing requirements, that are proposed for preliminary adoption by the board. The drart rule exempts certain types of burning from needing to obtain an approval and allows the ceremonial burning of United States nags.

For additional information concerning this rule contact Susan Bem at the Indiana Department ol Environmental Management, Orlice ot Air Quality, Room 1003, Indiana Government Center North, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis at (317) 233-5697 or (BOO) 451-6027 (ext 3-5697){in Indiana),,

or sbem@idem ingov

For this hearing, oral statements will be heard, but for Lhe accuracy of !he record, please submit statements in writing to the attendant designated to receive written comments at the public hearing.

A transcript of the hearing and all written submissions to the board at the public hearing shall be open to public inspection at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management; copies may be made available to any person upon payment of reproduction· costs. Any person heard or represented
at the hearing or requesting notice shall be given written notice of the action ol the board.

Christine Pedersen. Chief Rule and Slate Implementation Plan Development Section Office of Air Quality

Individuals requiring reasonable accommodations lor participation in this
event should contact the Indiana Department of Environmental Management. Americans with Disabilities Act coordinator at: Attn: ADA CoOrdinator Indiana Department of EnvirOnmental Management 100 N. Senate Avenue Indianapolis. IN 46204

or call {317) 233-1785. Speech and hearing impaired callers may contact the agency via the Indiana Relay Se!Yice att-BD0-743-3333. Please provide a minimum ol 72 hours= notification. 

### (



## ZP:OD1P**~~-** 

# ,,. .**~~ r·:.~.~-~** 

, r

# :•~1 'tCH

::**~.**

### ~iF~,.~

### ::P~~

## ~~~W,l**7\h** 

## VE

RTI
SE



### M 

### EN

T



### HE

RE Prescribed by State Board of Accounts Genera! Form No. 99P (Rev. 2009A)

lake CountY. Jndiana 601-45th Avenue, Munster, IN 46321

PUBLISHER'S CLAIM

LJNE COUNT Display Master (Must not exceed two actual lines, neither of which sha!l total more than four solid lines of the type in which the body of the
advertisement is set)- number of equivalent lines Head

- number of lines

_______________________________________________ . Body- number of lines Tail-- number of lines Total number of lines in notice**COMPUT~ION** OF CHARGES

. 

### :z1 

# q 2.J.'iline"s,

.... .\.

... columns wide equals

....... equivalent lines at 36.41 ...........................

cents per line

____________________________________________________________________ . Additional charges for notices containing rule or tabular work (50 per cent of above amount)

___ ---

____ --- _-- _---- ----

__ --------

___ -- ---------------

___ --

___ _ Charge for. extra proofs of publication ($1.00 for eaCh proof in excess $

# .7.?.:7~

of two)

_______________________________________________________________________ _ $ 

# :J.**l.~::7.:';I;_** 

# # C,(J 

# 3

# ~v**<;?~('** TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIM

___________________ -.---

______________________________ .

DATA FOR COMPUTING COST
Width of single column in picas 9p4 Number of insertions: 1 Size of type 7.0 poinl

Pursuant.to the provisions and penalties of lC 5-11-10-1, 1 hereby certify that the foregoing account is just and correct, that the amount**claim~d** is legally due, after allowing all just credits, and that no part of the same has,_ been paid.

I**al~o·certify** that the _printed matter attached hereto is a true copy, of the same column width and type size,

# ~ic~~·~.d.uly.~~~~~~h.e~·i·n·snrr;;_:~:J.:_.d~te.sz:~~ti~~~.·;;'lo~.s: ........... .

Additionally, the statement checked below is true and**c~rrect:**

......**Newspap~r** does not have a Web site

.

.. X

.. Newspaper has a Web site and this public notice was posted on the same day as it was published in

· the newspaper.

. ·

...... Newspaper has a Web site, but due to technical prqblem or error, public notice was posted on

.............. ..

,,, Newspaper has a Web site but refuses to post lhe public notice.**~**



# . /V) 

# cA 73 KateStephens

......

# ~J.~

Date 

# .L/..../{)/o!.YJ...

............... , ...... , Z'tJ111 Title: Legal ClerkIi..l!.5}..:1l"ClaimNo.WarrantNo.-------INFAVOROF'-----ONACCOUNTOFAPPROPRIATIONFORTheTimesMediaCompany601W.45thAvenue,Munster,IN46321ARproprlationALLOWED__________INTHESUMOF$_____Ihaveexaminedthewithinclaimendherebycertifyasfollows:ThatItIsinproperform.ThatItIsdulyauthenticatedasrequiredbylaw.ThatItIsbaseduponstatutoryauthority.correctThatItIsapparentlyIncorrectIcertifythatthewithinclaimIstrueandcorrectthattheservIcesthereInItemizedandforwhichchargeIsmadewereorderedbymeandwerenecessarylothepublicbusiness..

### THE TIMES MEDIA COMPANY, MUNSTER, IN

Legal Notice of Public HearingATTACH

COPY OF

CLIPPING

HERE**····-----~1** 

# l

5552181

Prescribed by State Board of Accounts**~** General Form No. 99P (Rev. 2009A)

Xl16 

# !

Indiana Department of

# Environ~ ental 

### i\? f( 

# 1**:~rJO** jj EVANSVILLg COURIER & PRESS



# . I l**·:~t"'·te** of Indiana 

## I '-->·p.•.S'IHDIX.Jr@R-'!I'tnmenhi**c'£9~EIJI,~p8)** Evansville, IN 47702

: Office of t\ir Qua!ity 

## I PUBLISHER'S CLAIM 

### I (Governmental Unii)

VANDERBURGH

LINE COUNT Display Master (Must not exceed two actual lines, neither of which shall
total more than four solid lines of the type in which the body of the
advertisement is set)

-- number of equivalent lines 468 Head

-- number of lines 0 Body

- number of lines 468
Tail-- number of lines 0 Total number of lines in notice

COMPUTATION OF CHARGES
468 lines,

___ 1

__ columns wide equals _4_§_8_ equivalent lines at**cen~~er_line** Additional charges for notices containing rule or tabular work (50 per cent of above amount) Charge for extra proofs of publication ($1.00 for each proof in excess of two)

TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIM

DATA FOR COMPUTING COST 468

0.2277 -'$'-------"1 06.56

$

$

_$'---

_ ____:1c::_0,6.56

Width of single column in picas 5p8 Size oftype

__ .._7

__ point Number of insertions 1

Pursuant to the provisions and penalties of IC 5-11-1 0-1, I hereby certify that the foregoing account is just and correct, that the amount claimed is legally due, after allowing all just credits, and that no part of the same has been paid.

I also certify that the printed matter attached hereto is a true copy, of the same column width and type size, which was duly published in said paper 1 times. The dates of publication being as follows:

March 19, 2011

Additionally, the statement checked below is true and correct

----,'"_Newspaper does not have a Web site. X Newspaper has a Web site and this public notice was posted on the same day as it was published
in the newspaper.

____ Newspaper has a Web site, but due to technical problem or error, public notice was posted on

____ Newspaper has a Web site but refuses to post the public notice.

Date 3/29/11

ATTACH COPY
OF ADVERTISEMENT

HERE Title Accounting ClerkcOJJ!lc§.;(!)0zc;;-e0OJU.JEEien.;:1lU.J-'a.c.v=v!!"0>.l!l0.l!l.c,!2vvenClaimNo.WarrantNo.____INFAVOROF$ONACCOUNTOFAPPROPRIATIONFORAppropriationNo.--------ALLOWED,__INTHESUMOF$_____Attest\haveexaminedthewithinclaimandherebycertifyasfollows:Thatitisinproperform.Thatitisdulyauthenticatedasrequiredbylaw.Thatitisbaseduponstatuto!)'authority.correctThatitisapparentlyincorrectIcertifythatthewithinclaimistrueandcorrect;thattheservicesthereinitemizedandforwhichchargeismadewereorderedbymeandwerenecessarytothepublicbusiness-""'-"""·

### EVANSVILLE COURIER AND PRESS, EVANSVILLE, IN

LEGAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

Under 40 CFR 51.102 notice is hereby given that the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board (board) will hold a public hearing at its regularly**~cheduled** meeting on Wednesday, May 4, 2011. The meetmg will convene at 1:00 p.m. at the Indiana Government Center-South, Conference Room C 402 West Washington Street, Indianapolis, Indiana. The pUrpose of the**he~** ring is t9 receive public comments prior to the proposed actiOns. All Interested persons are invited and will be given reasonable opportunity to express their views concerning the proposed aCtion.

Copies of the propo:;ed rule are**aya~lable** tq any person upon**requ~st** and are ava1lable foJ;publlc Jnspectton at the following locations: Indiana Department of Environmental Management Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center-North, 100 North Sen- ate Avenue, 10th floor-East wing, Indianapolis Indiana 46204. legislative Services Agency, lndi;ma**Govern~ent** CenterNorth, 1 DO North Senate Avenue, Room N201 Indianapolis Indiana 46204. ' ' Indiana Department of Environmental Management, North- west Office, 8380 louisiana Street Merrillville Indiana 46410**ln~iana** D_epartment of En':'irqnmental Management, Northeni Off1ce, SUite 450, 300 N. M1ch1gan Street. South Bend Indiana 46601. ' Indiana Department of Environmental Management South- west Office, 1120 North Vincennes Avenue, P.O. Box'128 Petersburg, Indiana 47567-0128. ' Indiana Department of Environmental Management, South- east Office, 820 West Sweet Street, Brownstown, Indiana 47220-9557. Indianapolis Central library, 40 East St. Clair Street Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. . ' Hammond Public library, 564 State Street, Hammond, Indiana 46320.**~lien** County Public Library, 900 library Plaza, Fort Wayne, Indiana 46B02. Evansville Vanderburgh Public library, 200 SE Martin luther King Jr. Blvd., Evansville, Indiana 47713.

Board documents mal be viewed and downloaded from the Indiana Department o Environmental Management's Web site as ear!y as one week prior to the meeting at http:l/\1\rWW. i n.g ov/idem/471 0. htm.

The following rule is noticed for hearing and action: GreenhOuse Gas Title V Clarification (lSA #11-85). The purpose of this hearing is to receive public comment on amend- ments to 326 lAC 2-7-1, concerning clarification of the Title V greenhouse gas tailoring rule, that are proposed for adoption by the board. The proposed rule amends language in the permitting rules to provide clarification on permitting of green- house gases in Title V permits. For additional information concerning this rule contact Susan Bern at the Indiana Department of EnvirOnmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Room 1003, Indiana Government Center North, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis at (317) 233-5697 or (BOO) 451-6027 (ext. 3-5697}(in 1ndi.3nai. or sbem@idem.in.gov.**~** Ethanol Plant Clarification (lSA#11-99). The purpose of this hearing is to receive public c-omment on amendments to 326 lAC 2, concerning ethanol plants, that are proposed for adoption by the board. The proposed rule clarifies that ethanol pro- duction facilities are excluded from the term "chemical pro-
cess plants" in the major source category. For additional information concerning this rule contact Amy Smith at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Room 1003, Indiana Government Center North, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis at (317)233-B628 or (BOO) 451-6027 {ext. 3-B62B)(in Indiana), or asmith@idem.in.gov. Compliance Monitoring (LSA#05-330). The purpose of this hearing is to receive public comment on amendments to 326 lAC 3, concerning compliance monitoring requirements that

are prop_osed for final adoption l?Y the board. The propOsed rule clanfies and UJ?dates compliance monitonng rule language a**':I~ stre~mhnes**  !?ertain requirements. For add1t10nat mformat10n concerning this rule contact Susan Bern at th_e**lndia~a Dep~rtment**  of Environmental Management, OffiCe of A1r Oual1ty. Room 1003, Indiana Government Center North, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis at (317) 23;3-569? or (BOO) 451-6027 (ext. 3-5697)(in Indiana), or sbem@ 1dem-.1n.gov.**Per~** it Fees jlSA#07-286). The purpose of this hearing is to receiVe public comment on amendments to 326 lAC 2-1 1 326 lAC 2-7, 3261AC 2-B. 3261AC 2-9, 3261AC 2-12 and 3261At 2-13 C?ncerning permit fees, that are proposed for preliminary**adop~10n** by the board. The draft rule clarifies and updates permit_ fee language and adds fees for certain woodworking aperat1ons.**Fo~** additional i':lformation concerning this rule contact Amy Sm1th at t_he**lnd1~na** Department of Environmental Management, Off1ce of A1r Quality, Room 1003, Indiana Government Center North, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis at (317)**233~B62B** _or (BOO) 451-6027 (ext. 3-862B)(in Indiana), or asm!th@Jdem.m.gov.

Hospitai/Medicalll!lfectio_us '-:Vaste Incinerators (lSA#10-733). The purpose of th1s heanng IS to receive publ1c comment on am':ndments**t~** 3?6 lAC 11-6, concerning**~ospital/medicallin fectlo~s**  waste mcmerators, that are proposed for preliminary adopt1on by the board. The draft rule updates existing rules for consistency with federal requirements. For additional information concerning this rule contact Susan Bern at th_e**India~** a**Dep<;~rtment** of Environmental Management, Off1ce of A1r Quality, Room 1003. Indiana Government Center North, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis at (317) 23_3-569? or (BOO) 451-6027 (ext. 3-5697){in Indiana), or sbem@Jdem.ln.gov

.. Open Burning (LSA#09-362). The purpose of this hearing is to receive public comment on amendments to 3261AC 4 con- cernmg open burning requirements, that are proposed For prelim mary adoption by the board. The draft rule exempts certain types of burning from needing to obtain an approval and allows the ceremonial burning of United States flags. For additional information concerning this rule contact Susan Bern at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality. Room 1003. Indiana Government Center North, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis at {317) 23_3-569? or (BOO) 451-6027 {ext. 3-5697)(in Indiana). or sbem@ldem.m.gov.

For this hearing, oral statements ':"'ill be heard, but for the ac- curacy of the record, please subm1t statements in writing to the attendant designated to receive written comments at the public hearing. A transcript of the hearing and all written submissions to the board at the public hearing shall be open to public inspection at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management· copies may be made available to any person upon**payme~t** of repr<?duction costs_. Any p_erson heard <?r represented at the heanng or requestu'lg not1ce shall be g1ven written notice of the act1on of the board. Christine Pedersen, Chief · Rule and State Implementation Plan Development Section Office of Air Quality**·~ lnd!vid~als**  _requiring reasonable accommodations for participatl?n 1n this event should contact the Indiana Department of Envrrqnmental Management, Americans with Disabilities Act coordmator at: Attn: ADA Coordinator Indiana Department of Environmental Management 100 N. Senate Avenue Indianapolis, IN 46204

or call (317) 233-17B5. Speech and hearing impaired callers may contact the agen!?Y via**t~e.lndiana** Relay Service at 1-800- 743-3?33. Please prov1de a m1mmum of72 hours notification. {Couner & Press March 19, 2011)

.

# A PPENDIX 

# E

# ,.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

··\' 

### 13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

.-t\ 

### BEFORE THE STATE OF INDIANA

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

PUBLIC MEETING OF DECEMBER 1, 2010



# ORIGINAL

PROCEEDINGS

before the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board,

Dr. James Miner, Chairman, taken before me,

Lindy L. Meyer, Jr., a Notary Public in and for

the State of Indiana, County of Shelby, at the

Indiana Government Center South, Conference

Center, Room C, 402 West Washington Street,

Indianapolis, Indiana, on Wednesday, December 1,

2010 at 1:04 o'clock p.m.

William F. Daniels, RPR/CP CM d/b/a ACCURATE REPORTING OF INDIANA 12922 Brighton Avenue Carmel, Indiana 46032 (317) 848-0088 1

### 1 APPEARANCES:

2 BOARD MEMBERS:

3

4

5

6

7

8

9



### 10



### 11

12

13



### 14

15



### 16

17



### 18

19



### 20

21



### 22

23 

### Dr. James Miner, M.D., Chairman Thomas Anderson Randy Staley Jeffery L. Quyle Chris Horn Dr. Phil Stevens David Benshoof Howard W. Cundiff, Proxy, State Board of Health John Bacone, Proxy, Department of Natural Resources Eric Levenhagen, Proxy, Indiana Economic Development Corporation

IDEM STAFF MEMBERS:

Thomas W. Easterly, IDEM Commissioner Keith Baugues, Asst. Commissioner Scott Deloney Chris Pedersen Manda Clevenger Ann Long Susan Bern Catherine Mitchell

PUBLIC SPEAKERS:

Ann Mciver Trevor Vance Stan Pinegar Patrick Bennett Miriam Dant 21

2

3



### 4



### 5 yes.

6

7 

### CHAIRMAN MINER:

Mr. Staley?

MR. STALEY: Aye.

CHAIRMAN MINER:

Mr. Quyle?

MR. QUYLE: Yes. 69



### Mr. Horn votes yes.

Mr. Staley votes

8 

### CHAIRMAN MINER: Mr. Quyle votes yes.

9



### 10

11



### 12 yes.

13

14

15



### 16 yes.

17

18

19 

### Dr. Stevens?

DR. STEVENS: Yes.

CHAIRMAN MINER: Dr. Stevens votes

Dr.

-- Mr. Bacone?

MR. BACONE: Yes.

CHAIRMAN MINER: Mr. Bacone votes

Mr. Anderson?

MR. ANDERSON: Yes.

CHAIRMAN MINER: Mr. Anderson votes

20 yes, and I vote yes as well, so the decision

21 passes.

22 The next item on our agenda is a public

23 hearing before the Air Pollution Control Board of

### 1 the State of Indiana regarding preliminary

2 adoption of amendments, 326 IAC 3 and

3 326 IAC 7-2-1, Compliance Monitoring.

4 

### I will now introduce Exhibit No. 3

--

5 thank you very much, Chris

-- the draft rule,

6 into the record of hearing.

7 Is there someone who wishes to speak to

8 this rule?

Susan?

MR. DELONEY: Susan Bern. 70

9



### 10



### 11 MS. BEM: My name is Susan Bern again,

12 and I work in the Rules and SIP Section.

13 This rulemaking amends IDEM's Compliance

14 Monitoring Rules in Article 3, and one section

15 

### of

-- there are two rules in Article 7-2-1. The

16 amendments address changes needed for federal

17 approval into the Indiana SIP, while also making

18 corrections and providing clarifications

19 throughout Article 3.

20 This rulemaking will add U.S. EPA approval

21 language to sections of the rule that allow for

22 Commissioner approval of alternative

23 requirements.

### 71

1 

### IDEM is also proposing to revise

2 monitoring requirements that affect peaking units

3 subject to acid rain provisions in 40 CFR

4 

### Part 75. Peaking units are not always operating,

5 and the amendments will allow for peaking units

6 to comply with the quality assurance requirements

7 for CEMS in Part 70 instead of Part 60, for

8 easier implementation.

9 

### IDEM is also proposing an amendment in

10 326 lAC 3-5-1 that wpuld allow for use of a

11 PM CEMS monitor instead of a continuous opacity

12 monitor, as more NESHAPS allow for PM CEMS

13 monitdring.

14 

### One of the main comments that IDEM

15 received on this rulemaking is the consistency

16 between state and federal requirements for CEMS

17 monitoring. IDEM is proposing to remove from the

18 applicability provisions in 3-5 for emission

19 units subject to a NESHAP.

20 

### Therefore, a unit only required to monitor

21 with a CEMS due to an applicable NESHAP and not

22 another state regulation would follow the CEMS

23 monitoring requirements in the NESHAP, and not

### 72



### 1 our state rule in 3-5.

2 

### I'd also like to mention that EPA is

3 currently reviewing all of the proposed

4 amendments to make sure that the final rule can

5 be approved into the SIP.

6 

### And then one other change that I wanted to

7 mention is that we're adding some clarifications

8 within the sampling and testing requirements in

9 3-6, where IDEM is proposing that the stack test

10 report also include a summary table comparing the

11 measured emissions with the applicable emissions

12 limitations.

13 

### And then there are also some minor updates

14 to the test method in Article 3-6, where we're

15 

### adding test methods for PM 10 

### and PM 2 . 5 • 

### It's been

16 a long time since the rule has been updated, and

17 those two pollutants weren't addressed in

18 Article 3.

19 The Department recommends that the Board

20 preliminarily adopt the rule as presented.

21 CHAIRMAN MINER: Thank you, Susan.

22 

### Is there any

--

23 

### MS. BEM: Any questions?·

### 1

2 Susan?

3

4



### 5 

### CHAIRMAN MINER:

-- questions for

MR. QUYLE: Mr. Chairman, a couple.

CHAIRMAN MINER: Yes.

MR. QUYLE: Susan, I noticed in the

6 history, this is a rule that began in December

7 

### of 2005.

8

9



### 10**~S.** 

### BEM: Uh-huh.

MR. QUYLE: And then I noticed there

were some comments about that later on. Can you 73



### 11 address procedurally why this rule has had such a

12 long birthing process?

13 

### MS. BEM: Well, yes. It was started

14 a few years back, in 2005, and I think just

15 because of other priorities and different issues

16 that came up where maybe people didn't know how

17 

### to address them, the rule sat there. And so, we

18 did start the rule back up with a second notice

19 earlier this year, and we received some comments,

20 you know, ''Why don't you just start the

21 rulemaking over?''

22 You know, one aspect to that is, you know,

23 if we start the rulemaking over, you're starting

### 74

1 

### with a first notice, where, you know, it's pretty

2 general, you're going out with some of the same

3 concerns that you addressed before, and then you

4 

### still have to go back and develop the draft rule

5 

### language.

6

7 

### You know, we started the rule back up

earlier this year. We put the draft rule

8 

### language out in a notice, and so that way we

9 

### could start getting comments again, and all of

10 

### that part has happened this year in, you know, a

11 

### little bit more prompt manner.

12 

### So, that way we felt we were in a position

13 

### where

-- you know, we didn't want this rule

14 

### lingering out there any longer, and there were

15 

### some concerns that we've been trying to get this

16 

### rule SIP approved and address the Commissioner's

17 

### discretion language that EPA asked us to address

18 

### a long time ago, and then we could actually get

19 

### movlng on that.

20

21 

### MR. QUYLE:

MS. BEM: Okay.

And so, we felt like, you

22 know, if we had a couple of public meetings and

23 conference calls with affected parties this year,

### 1 that way we could, you know, sort of address

2 those concerns and move forward.

3

4 

### MR. QUYLE: Okay. Thanks.

MS. BEM: But yes, it started a long

5 time ago.

6

7

8

9 

### MR. QUYLE: Okay.

CHAIRMAN MINER: Thank you, Susan.

Any other questions for Susan?

(No response.) 75



### 10 

### CHAIRMAN MINER: Thank you very much,

11 Susan.

12

13 

### MS. BEM: Okay.

CHAIRMAN MINER: Thank you.

I have one card at

14 present for this rule, although I thought I saw

15 him step out.

16

17



### 18 

### MS. MCIVER: He has a substitute.

CHAIRMAN MINER: Okay. Very good.

COMM. EASTERLY: So, who is she

19 supposed to be?

CHAIRMAN MINER: Stan Pinegar. 20

21 

### MS. MCIVER: I'm supposed to be Stan.

22 I'd need to stand on a very tall chair to be

23 Stan.76



### (Laughter.) 1

2 MS. MCIVER: Good afternoon. My name

3 is Ann Mciver, not Stan Pinegar, and I'm offering

4 these comments on behalf of the Indiana Energy

5 

### Association. I'm appearing before you today on

6 behalf of the 13 investor-owned gas and electric

7 utilities and one public charitable trust gas

8 utility, which make up the membership of the

9 Indiana Energy Association.

10 I'm also speaking on behalf of the four

11 non-IEA-member electric generating companies who

12 

### are participants in the Indiana Utility Group and

13 with whom we· collaborate on various environmental

14 

### matters. Collectively, these companies represent

15 97 percent of the electric generating capacity in

16 the state, which is impacted by these proposed

17 rules, and these companies serve over four

18 million Hoosier customers.

19 We appreciate the consideration of the

20 many suggestions made by the IUG in our written

21 comments as well through discussion conducted at

22 a workshop hosted by IDEM after the draft rule

23 was posted in March.

### 1 We've identified a few areas of the

2 proposed rule which we continue to have some

3 concern over and want to quickly bring to the

4 

### Board's attention. Our request to the agency is

5 the opportunity to continue to work with IDEM

6 representatives on these issues prior to the

7 third notice and final adoption of the rule.

8 

### The first is the introduction of the term

9 ''peaking unit" into the proposed rule in the

10 definition section at 326 IAC 3-4-1,

11 section (13). We need to give this provision

12 further evaluation and look forward to hearing

13 IDEM's view of the impact of that provision.

14 We suggest that the standard operating

15 procedure, or SOP, requirements at 77

16 326 IAC 3-5-4 (c) should be clarified to provide

17 that the SOP manual does not need to be updated

18 between the submittal of revisions if a record of

19 the change to the procedure is kept in a central

20 location rather than on-site, which is sometimes

21 impractical, and made available for inspection by

22 the Department upon request.

23 There is confusion generated by a response78



### 1 to comments related to the timing of submittal of

2 certain reports related to relative accuracy test

3 

### audits at 326 IAC 3-5-5(f). The IUG submitted

4 comments recommending submittal within 45 days

5 after completion of the tests. It appears that

6 IDEM agreed with our comments, but the previous

7 provision requiring submittal within 30 days

8 after the end of the quarter remains in the

9 proposed rule.

10

11

12 Likewise, confusion persists with regard

to time frames for emission test runs. The IUG

suggested extending the current 24-hour

13 requirement, which IDEM seemed to agree to and

14 responded they would provide up to 48 hours.

15 This change, however, doesn't seem to be noted at

16 326 IAC 3-6-3 (b) (2).

17 

### Finally, we're not clear on a few other

18 provisions, including the new Continuous

19 Emissions Monitoring and Continuous Opacity

20 Monitoring data requirements at 326 IAC 3-5-8 and

21 the test invalidation criteria provided at

22 326 IAC 3-6-6.

23 You've undoubtedly come to the same79



### conclusion that Stan did: This ls highly 1



### 2 technical work. We appreciate the opportunity to

3 comment and would greatly appreciate the

4 opportunity to participate in an additional

5 workshop related to these rules with IDEM

6 personnel prior to final Board action.

7

8

9 

### CHAIRMAN MINER: Thank you.

MS. MCIVER: Any questions?

CHAIRMAN MINER: Any questions for

10 Ann

-- or Stan?

11



### 12

13



### 14 

### MS. MCIVER: Or Stan.

(No response_)

MS. MCIVER: Thank you.

CHAIRMAN MINER: Thank you very much.

15 Is there anyone else present today who

16 wishes to speak to this rule?

17 (No response.)

18

19 

### CHAIRMAN MINER:

hearing is now concluded. Seeing none, this

We are ready for Board

20 action on preliminary adoption of amendments,

21 326 IAC 3 and 326 IAC 7-2-1, Compliance

22 Monitoring.

23 Are there any questions from the Board at

### 1 this time?

2 MR. BENSHOOF: Is there going to

3 be

-- and this

-- I guess this is directed to

4 

### IDEM. Is there going to be another worksh6p?

5 

### there going to be some other meetings with the

6 

### affected parties between now and final adoption

7 

### of this rule? I mean is anything in the works,

8 

### or

--

9 

### MR. DELONEY: We haven't scheduled

10 any additional stakeholder meetings at this

11 point. We haven't received any additional

12 comments until today, so we were unaware of

13 anything that needed to be sorted through, but

14 obviously there will need to be continued

15 communication as we work towards preparing a 80



### Is

16 

### third notice, so my expectation is, is that there

17 will be a stakeholder meeting between now and

18 before the third notice would go to the

19 Commissioner for consideration.

20 

### COMM. EASTERLY: Well, we certainly

21 need the rule to match the response to comments.

22 I'm embarrassed that I didn't notice that.

23 

### MR. DELONEY: I don't know if Susan

### 1 had any

-- when

-- in terms of our response to

2 comments not matching the language in the rule,

3 

### did you have any

-- 81

4 

### MS. BEM: We just have several people

5 

### look at it.

6



### 7 

### MR. DELONEY: Yeah. Okay.

MS. BEM: And if I could clarify, the

8 

### workshop will probably happen after

-- after the

9 

### 30-day notice and before final adoption

--

10

11 

### to

--

12 MR. DELONEY: The third notice has

MS. BEM: --because we can't make

13 any changes before public notification.

14



### 15 it in words.

16

17 

### MR. DELONEY: So you can get to see

COMM. EASTERLY: Yeah.

MR. QUYLE: I'm sorry. So/ you 1 

### re

18 

### saying procedurally you don't want to change it

19 before third notice, so then there will be an

20 opportunity?

21 COMM. EASTERLY: No, we change the

22 words before third notice, but we still will have

23 another meeting and we-- I'll ask a question.

### 82



### 1 We can still change the words after third notice,

2 before we bring it to the Board based on the

3 

### comments?

4

5 

### MR. DELONEY: Right.

MS. BEM: Yeah. Just what we publish

6 is what we adopt today.

7 

### CHAIRMAN MINER: All right. Get all

8 of the corrections correct, so to speak.

9



### 10 

### (Laughter.)

CHAIRMAN MINER: Are there any

11 questions from the Board at this time regarding

12 the rule?

13 (No response.)

14 

### CHAIRMAN MINER: Then I would

15 entertain a motion for preliminary adoption of

16 the rule.

17

18



### 19 Mr. Staley.

20



### 21 MR. STALEY: So moved.

CHAIRMAN MINER: I have a motion from

MR. BENSHOOF: Second.

CHAIRMAN MINER: A second from

22 Mr. Benshoof. All those in favor, signify by

23 saying aye.1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9



### 10

11



### 12

13

14 

### MR. HORN: Aye.

MR. BACONE: Aye.

MR. ANDERSON: Aye.

MR. BENSHOOF: Aye.

MR. LEVENHAGEN: Aye.

MR. CUNDIFF: Aye.

MR. QUYLE: Aye.

DR. STEVENS: Aye.

MR. STALEY: Aye.

CHAIRMAN MINER: Aye.

Opposed?

(No response.)

CHAIRMAN MINER: The rule passes.

The next item, are there any other issues

15 present that someone wishes to address to the

16 Board at this time?

17 (No**~esponse.)**



### 18 

### CHAIRMAN MINER: Seeing none, the

19 next Air Pollution Control Board meeting is 83



### 20 tentatively scheduled for 1:00 p.m. February 2nd,

21 2011 at the Tippecanoe County Public Library at

22 627 South Street, Lafayette, Indiana. Please

23 contact the Office of Air Quality at 317-233-0426

### 86

1 

### CERTIFICATE

2 

### I, Lindy L. Meyer, Jr., the undersigned

3 Court Reporter and Notary Public residing in the

4 City of Shelbyville, Shelby County, Indiana, do

5 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and

6 correct transcript of the proceedings taken by me

7 on Wednesday, December 1, 2010 in this matter and

8 

### transcribed by me.

9



### 10

11 

### Lindy L. Meyer, Jr.,

12 Notary Public ln and

13 

### for the State of Indiana.

14



### 15 My Commission expires October 27, 2016.

16

17

18



### 19



### 20

21

22

23Drm #05-330 Compliance Monitoring December 1, 2010

1 TITLE 326 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

DRAFT RULE LSA Document #05-330

DIGEST

Amends 326 IAC 3 concerning compliance monitoring and 326 IAC 7-2 concerning sulfur dioxide compliance requirements. Effective 30 days after filing with the Publisher.

HISTORY First Notice of Comment Period: December 1, 2005, Indiana Register (29 IR 899). Second Notice of Comment Period: March 31, 2010, Indiana Register (DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA). Notice of First Hearing: March 31, 2010, Indiana Register (DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330PHA).Continuation of Second Notice of Comment Period: May 12, 2010, Indiana Register (DIN: 20100512-IR326050330SCA). Change in Notice of First Hearing: August 4, 2010, Indiana Register (DIN: 20100804-IR-326050330CHA). Change in Notice of First Hearing: October 20, 2010, Indiana Register (DIN: 20101020-IR-326050330CHA). Date of First Hearin g: December 1, 2010.

326 IAC 3-4-1; 326 IAC 3-4-2; 326 IAC 3-4-3; 326 IAC 3-5-1; 326 IAC 3-5-2; 326 IAC 3-5-3; 326 IAC 3-5-4; 326 IAC 3-5-5; 326 IAC 3-5-6; 326 IAC 3-5-7; 326 IAC 3-5-8; 326 IAC 3-6-1; 326 IAC 3-6-2; 326 IAC 3-6-3; 326 IAC 3- 6-4; 326 IAC 3-6-5; 326 IAC 3-6-6; 326 IAC 3-7-1; 326 IAC 3-7-1; 326 IAC 3-7-2; 326 IAC 3-7-3; 326 IAC 3-7-4; 326 IAC 3-7-5; 326 IAC 7-2-1.

DRAFT RULE

SECTION 1. 326 IAC 3-4-1 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-4-1 Definitions Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-11; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 1. In addition to the definitions provided in IC 13-11, 326 IAC 1-2, and 326 IAC 2-7, the following definitions apply throughout this article unless expressly stated otherwise: (1) "Applicable emission limitation or standard" means any of the following: (A) A state orfederal emission limitation or standard applicable to a regula ted hazardous airpollutant under40 CFR 61* or40 CFR 63*. (B) A state or federal emission limitation or standard applicable to a regulated air pollutant, otherthan a hazardous air pollutant underSection 112 of the CAA, for which the source is classifie d as amajor

source. (1) "Boiler operating day" means a twenty

- four (24) hour period betw een midnight and the following midnight during which any fuel is co mbusted at any time in the steam

- generating unit. It is not necessary for fuel to be combusted the e ntire twenty

- four (24) hour period. (2) (1) "Calendar quarter" means a consecutive three (3) month period (nonoverlapping) beginning on: (A) January 1; (B) April 1; (C) July 1; or (D) October 1. (3) "Certified emissions monitor" means an emissions monitor that meets all applicable performanceDrm #05-330 Compliance Monitoring December 1, 2010

2 specifications of 40 CFR 60* or any other performance specification, and forwhich performance datahas been submitted to and approved by the department. (2) "Capture system" means the equipment, including hoods, ducts, fans, and booths, that is used to contain, capture, and transport a pollutant to a control device. (3) "Continuous emission monitori ng system" or "CEMS" means the equipment required by the applicable permit, state rule, or federal regulation used to sample, analyze, measure, and provide a continuous, permanent record of emissions in units of the applic able standard or other form. (4) "Continuous opacity monitoring system" or "COM S" means the equipment required by the applicable permit, state rule, or federal regulation used to measure the opacity of the effluent on a continuous basis as either of the following: (A) The optical density of the effluent gas. (B) The opacity of the effluent gas. (5) "Data" means the results of any type of mo nitoring or method, in cluding the results of: (A) instrumental or noni nstrumental monitoring; (B) emission calculations; (C) manual sampling procedures; (D) record keeping procedures; or (E) any other form of information collection pr ocedure used in connection with any type of monitoring or method. (6) "Emission limitation or standard" means the following: (A) Any applicable requirement under the CAA that constitutes: (i) an emission limitation or standard; (ii) a standard of performance; or (iii) a means of emission limitation. (B) An emission limitation or standard may be expressed: (i) in terms of the pollutant, either as: (AA) a specific quantity, rate, or concentration of emissions; or (BB) the relationship of uncontro lled to controlled emissions; or (ii) as either: (AA) a work practice; (BB) process or control devices parameter; or (CC) another form of specific: (aa) design; (bb) equipment; (cc) operational; or (dd) operation and maintenance requirement. (C) For purposes of 326 IAC 3-8, an emission limitation or standard shall not include general operation requirements that an owner or operator may be required to meet. (4) (7) "Emission test", "source sampling test", "compliance test", or "perform ance test" means a procedure for sampling a gas stream from a single sampling location at a an facility, emissions unit, or pollution control equipment, to determine a pollutant emission rate, concentration, or parameter while the facility, emissions unit, unit or pollution control equipment is operating at conditions that result in measurement of the highest emission or parameter values (prior to any control device), or at other operating conditions approved by the department or U.S. EPA. A test shall comprise three (3) sampli ng runs for a specified sampling time span. Additional conditions may be required by applicable rules, permit, or enforcement order. The test owner or operator shall be performed perform the test using sampling and analytical procedures approved by the department or U.S. EPA for the specific pollutant or parameter and facility, emissions unit, pollution control equipment, process, or operation. (5) (8) "Emissions unit" means any part of or activity at a source that emits or has the potential to emit any regulated air pollutant for which an emission limitation or standard has been established. This term does not alter or affect the definition of the term "unit" for purposes of Title IV of the CAA or of the term "emissions unit" for purposes of Title V of the CAA. has the meaning set forth in 326 IAC 1-2-23.5.Drm #05-330 Compliance Monitoring December 1, 2010

3 (9) "Exceedance" mean s a condition that: (A) is detected by monitoring that provides data in terms of an emission limitation or standard; and (B) indicates that emissions (or opacity) are grea ter than the applicable emission limitation or standard (or less than the applic able standard in the case of a percent reduction requirement) consistent with any averaging period specifie d for averaging the resul ts of the monitoring. (10) "Malfunction" means any sudden, infrequent, and not reasonably preventable failure of air pollution control equipment, process equipment, or a process to operate in a no rmal or usual manner. Failures that are caused in part by poor maintenance or careless operation are not malfunctio ns. For purposes of this article, a CEMS or COMS is considered process equipment. (6) "Major source" means any major source as defined in 326 IAC 2

- 7

- 1(22) , excluding any source described in 326 IAC 2

- 7

- 1(22)(A). (7) (11) "Monitoring" means any form of collecting data on a routine basis to determine or otherwise assess compliance with emission limitations or standards. The term includes the following: (A) Record keeping, if records are used to de termine or assess compliance with an emission limitation or standard, including: (i) records of raw material content and usage; (ii) records that documen t compliance with work practice requirements; or (iii) other records used to determine or as sess compliance with an emission limitation or standard. (B) Compliance method tests that are con ducted on a routine periodic basis. (C) One (1) or more of the following data co llection techniques, where appropriate, for a particular circumstance: (i) Continuous emission or opacity monitoring systems. (ii) Continuous process, ca pture system, control device, or other relevant parameter monitoring systems or procedures, including a PEMS. (iii) Emission estimation and calculation procedures. (iv) Maintenance and analysis of records of fuel or raw materials usage. (v) Recording results of a program or protocol to conduct specific operation and maintenance procedures. (vi) Verification of emissions, process parameters, capture sy stem parameters, or control device parameters, using portable or in situ measurement devices. (vii) Visible emission observations. (viii) Any other form of measuring, recording, or verifying on a routine basis emissions, process parameters, capture sy stem parameters, control de vice parameters, or other factors relevant to assessing compliance wi th an emission limitation or standards. (8) "Monitor system malfunction" means any interruption in the collection of valid dataas aresult of the failure of

any component of the system to operate within the specifications of the applicable performance specification. (9) (12) "Out of control" means any data collected by a continuous monitoring system during periods immediately following an out of tolerance quality assurance assessment and prior to an acceptable quality

assurance assessment. (13) "Peaking unit" means the following: (A) An emissions unit that has: (i) an average capacity fact or of not more than ten and zero-tenths percent (10.0%) during the previous three (3 ) calendar years; and (ii) a capacity factor of not more than twenty and zero-tenths percent (20.0%) in each of those calendar years. (B) For purposes of 40 CFR 75*, an emissions unit may initially qualify as a peaking unit if the designated representative demonstrates to th e satisfaction of the commissioner that the requirements of clause (A) are met, or will in the future be met, through on e (1) of the following submissions: (i) For a unit for which a monitoring plan has not been submitted under 40 CFR 75.62*,Drm #05-330 Compliance Monitoring December 1, 2010

4 the designated representa tive submits either: (AA) capacity factor datafor the emissions unit for the three (3) calendar years immediately preceding the date of initial submission of the monitoring plan for the emissions unit under 40 CFR 75.62*; or (BB) if an emissions unit does not have capa city factor data for one (1) or more of the three (3) calendar years immediately p receding the date of initial submission of the monitoring plan for the unit unde r 40 CFR 75.62*, a ll available capacity factor data, beginning with the date on which the emissions unit commenced commercial operation, and project ed capacity factor data. (ii) For a unit for which a monitoring plan has already been submitted under 40 CFR 75.62*, that has not qualified as a peaking unit under item (i), and where capacity factor changes, the designated rep resentative submits either: (AA) three (3) calendar years of data fo llowing the change in the emissions unit's capacity factor showing an average capacity factor of not more than ten and zero-tenths percent (10.0%) during the thr ee (3) previous calendar years and a capacity factor of not more than twenty and zero-t enths percent (20.0%) in each of those calendar years; or (BB) one (1) calendar year of data following the change in the emissions unit's capacity factor showing a capacity factor of not more than ten and zero-tenths percent (10.0%) and a statement that this changed pattern of operation resulting in a capacity factor less than ten a nd zero-tenths percent (10.0%) is considered permanent and is projected to continue for the foreseeable future. (C) For purposes of 40 CFR 75*, an emissions unit th at initially qualifies as a peaking unit must meet the criteria in clause (A) each year in order to continue to qualify as a peaking unit. If such an emissions unit fails to meet such criteria for a given year, the emissions unit no longer qualifies as a peaking unit starting January 1 of the year after the year for which the criteria are not met. If an emissions unit failing to meet the criteria in cl ause (A) initially qualif ied as a peaking unit under clause (B), the emissions unit may qualify as a peaking unit for a subsequent year only if the designated representative submits the data specified in clause (B)(ii)(AA). (D) An emissions unit required to comply with the provisions of Subpart H of 40 CFR 75*, under a state or federal NO X mass emissions reduction program, may, pursuant to 40 CFR 75.74(c)(11)*, qualify as a peaking unit on an ozone season basis rather than an annual basis, if the owner or operator reports NO X mass emissions and heat input data only during the ozone season. (10) "Permit" means any applicab le permit issued, renewed, amen de d, revised, or modified under 326 IAC 2

- 1

, 326 IAC 2

- 2 , 326 IAC 2

- 3, 326 IAC 2

- 7, 326 IAC 2

- 8, or 326 IAC 2

- 9. (15) "Predictive emission monitoring system" or "PEMS" means a system that uses process and other parameters as inputs to a computer program or other da ta reduction system to produce values in terms of the applicable emission limitation or standard. (16) "QA operating quarter" means a calendar quarter in which there are at least one hundred sixty-eight (168) unit operating hours, as defined in subdivision (25), or, for a common stack or bypass stack, a calendar quarter in which there are at least one hun dred sixty-eight (168) stack operating hours, as defined in subdivision (24). (11) (17) "Quality assurance" means those activities performed to ensu re that monitoring dataare sufficiently representative, accurate, precise, reliable, frequent, and timely. Those activities include, but are not limited to, frequent activities (daily) and less frequent activities (weekly, monthly, quarterly, and yearly). establish validity of data used to demonstrate compliance. (18) "Stack operating hour" means a clock hour durin g which flue gases flow through a particular stack or duct, either for the entire hour or for part of the hour, while any associated emissions units are combusting fuel. (19) "Unit operating hour" means a clock hour during which an emissions unit combusts any fuel, either for part of the hour or for the entire hour.Drm #05-330 Compliance Monitoring December 1, 2010

5 *These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-4- 1; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2062; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1566; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 30)

SECTION 2. 326 IAC 3-4-2 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-4-2 Certification Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4-3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 2. Each report submitted under this article shall contain a certification of truth, accuracy, and completeness. This certification and any other certifica tion required under this article shall state that, based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements and information in the docu ment are true, accurate, and complete. Reports submitted under 326 IAC 3-8 shall meet the cert ification requirements of 326 IAC 2-7-4(f). (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-4-2; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2063; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477)

SECTION 3. 326 IAC 3-4-3 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-4-3 Conversion factors Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 3. (a) Owners or operators of facilities emissions units subject to this article shall use the following procedures for converting monitoring data to units of the standard where necessary: (1) For The owner or operator of a fossil fuel-fired steam generators, generator shall use the following procedures shall be used to convert gaseous emission monitoring data in parts per million (ppm) to pounds per million British thermal units (Btu) (lbs/MMBtu) where necessary: (A) When the owner or operator of a fossil fuel-fired steam generator elects unde r this article to measure oxygen (O 2 ) in flue gases, the measurements of owner or operator shall measure the pollutant concentration and oxygen shall be on a dry basis and use the following conversion procedure: used:

(B) When the owner or operator elects under this article to measure carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) in flue gases, the measurement of owner or operator shall measure the pollutant concentration and the CO 2 concentration shall each be on a consistent basis (wet or dry) and use the following conversion procedure: used:

(C) When the owner or operator elects under this article to measure sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) or nitrogen oxides (NO
x ) in the flue gases, the measurementof owner or operator shall measure the diluent concentration and the SO 2 and or the NO
x concentration shall each be on a wet basis and use the following conversion procedure, used, except where wet scrubbers are employed or where moisture is otherwise added to the stack gases:Drm #05-330 Compliance Monitoring December 1, 2010

6 (D) When the owner or operator elects under this article to measure SO 2 or NO
x in the flue gases, the

measurement of owner or operator shall measure the diluent concentration and the SO 2 and or the NO
x concentration shall each be on a wet basis and use the following conversion procedure, shall be used where wet scrubbers or moisture is otherwise present in the stack gases, provided water vapor content of the stack gas is measured at least once every fifteen (15) minutes at the same point as the pollutant and oxygen measurements are made:

(E) The values used in the equations under this subdivision are derived as follows:

C ws = Pollutant concentration at stack conditions in gr ams per wet standard cubic meter (g/wscm) or pounds per wet standard cubic meter (lbs/wscm), determined by multiplying the average concentration in parts per million (ppm) for each one (1) hour period by 4.15 × 10 -5 M g/wscm per ppm or 2.59 × 10 -9 M lbs/wscm per ppm, where M is pollutant molecular weight in grams per gram-mole (g/g-mole) or pounds per pound-mole (lb/lb-mole).
M = 64.07 for SO 2 and 46.01 for oxides of nitrogen (NO
x ) as NO 2 . C = Pollutant concentration at stack conditions in pounds per dry standard cubic meter (lbs/dscm) or grams per dry standard cubic meter (g/dscm). F, F c = A factor representing a ratio of the volume of dr y flue gases generated to the calorific value of the fuel combusted (F), and a factor representing a ratio of the volume of carbon dioxide generated to the calorific value of the fuel combusted (F c ), respectively. Va lues of F and F c are given in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 19*, as applicable.
F w = A factor representing a ratio of the volume of wet flue gases generated to the calorific value of the fuel combusted. Values of F
w are given in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 19*.
B wa= Proportion by volume of water vapor in the ambient air.
B ws = Proportion by volume of water vapor in the stack gas.

E = Pollutant emission, lbs/MMBtu.
Percent O 2 , percent CO 2 = Oxygen or carbon dioxide volume (expressed as percent) determined with equipment specified under this article.
Percent O 2ws = Oxygen volume (expressed as percent) measurem ents made at stack conditions on a wet basis. (2) For sulfuric acid plants or production facilities, the owner or operator shall: (A) establish a conversion factor th ree (3) times daily according to the procedures of 40 CFR 60.84(b)*; (B) multiply the conversion factor by the average sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) concentration in the flue gases to obtain average SO 2 emissions in pounds per ton (lbs/ton); and (C) report the average sulfur dioxide emissions for each three (3) hour period in excess of the emission standard set forth in 326 IAC 7 in the quarterly summary. report.

(b) The department may approve alternate procedures for computing emission averag es that do not require integration of data or alternative methods of converting pollutant concentration measurements to units of the emission standard may be approved by the departmentif the owner or operator shows that th e alternate procedures are at least as accurate as those in this rule.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North SenateDrm #05-330 Compliance Monitoring December 1, 2010

7 Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-4- 3; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2063; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1566; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 31)

SECTION 4. 326 IAC 3-5-1 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-5-1 Applicability; co ntinuous monitoring requirements for applicab le pollutants Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4-3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 1. (a) This rule establishes the following: (1) Substantive requirements for monitoring certain types of sources

. (2) A process for developing suitable monitoring requirem ents for other types of sources

.
(b) This rule applies to the following sources and or facilities emissions units to determine compliance with an emission limitation or standard: hereinafter referred to as affected facilities: (1) Any facility emissions unit required to perform continuous monitoring under 326 IAC 12. which incorporates by reference the requirements of 40 CFR 60*, orby astandard for hazardous air pollutants under 326 IAC 14

, which incorporates by reference the requirements of 40 CFR 61*, or 326 IAC 20

, which incorporates by reference the requirements of 40 CFR 63*. (2) Fossil fuel-fired steam generators of greater than one hundred million (100,000 ,000) British thermal units (Btus) (Btu) per hour heat input capacity. (3) Sulfuric acid plants or production facilities of greater than three hundred (300) tons per day acid production capacity. (4) Petroleum refinery catalyst regenera tors for fluid bed catalytic cracking un its of greater than twenty thousand (20,000) barrels or eight hundred forty thousand (840,000) gallons per day fresh feed capacity. (5) Portland cement plants. (6) Facilities Sources or emissions units that combust sewage sludge. (7) Sources or emissions units making coke from raw materials, including the following: (A) Coal refining byproducts. (B) Petroleum refining byproducts. (8) Facilities Emissions units in Clark and Floyd Counties that: (A) have potential to emit nitrogen oxides (NO
x ) of greater than or equal to forty (40) tons per year; and (B) are located at sources that have potential to emit NO
x of greater than or equal to one hundred (100) tons per year as described in 326 IAC 10. (9) Any emissions unit required to monitor under subsection (c).

(c) (b) Owners and operators of sources and or facilities emissions units described in subsection (b) (a) are subject to the following requirements: (1) Any facility emissions unit subject to 326 IAC 12, which incorporates by reference the requirements of 40 CFR 60*, 326 IAC 14, which incorporates by reference the requirement s of 40 CFR 61*

, or 326 IAC 20

, which incorporates by reference the requirements of 40 CFR 61*, shall comply with the following: (A) The monitoring and reporting requirements as specified for the applicable rule. (B) All requirements of this rule. (2) The owner or operator of a fossil fuel-fired steam generators generator of greater than one hundred million (100,000,000) Btu per hour heat input capacity shall continuously monitor the following: (A) Opacity, unless one (1) of the following occurs: (i) Gaseous fuel is the only fuel combusted. (ii) Oil or a mix of gas and oil are the only fuels combusted and the facility emissions unit is able to comply with both of the following rules without using particulate matter collection equipment: (AA) 326 IAC 5-1.Drm #05-330 Compliance Monitoring December 1, 2010

8 (BB) 326 IAC 6-2. (iii) An alternative monitoring requirement request has been granted by the department and approved by U.S. EPA. The owner or operator may requestan alternative monitoring requirement may be requested when installation of an opacity monitoring system would not provide accurate determinations of emissions as a result of interference from condensed uncombined water vapor. Any alternative monitoring requirement request shall address the following: (AA) Information pertaining to the inability of the affected facility emissions unit to find an acceptable monitori ng location prior to the so urce of the condensed, uncombined water vapor. (BB) A list of proposed alternative mon itoring requirements. For each proposed alternative monitoring requirement, the request must provide a detailed description of thresholds or triggers for corrective action resulting from deviation from normal operating parameters and how deviations fr om key surrogate parameters shall be addressed to insure ensure continuous compliance with all applicable particulate and opacity requirements. An example of an acc eptable alternative monitoring requirement is a particulate compliance demonstration that is no less frequent than annual performed at least annually, in accordance with 326 IAC 3-6 and a compliance monitoring plan that, at a minimum, satisfies monitoring requirements under 326 IAC 2-7 or 326 IAC 2-8. (CC) Record keeping that is consis tent with section 6 of this rule. (DD) Reporting frequency that is no less frequent than that required in section 7 of this rule. (iv) An alternative monitoring requirement request granted by the department under item (iii) shall be submitted to U.S. EPA as a state implementation plan (SIP) revision and shall not be in effect until approved as a SIP revision. (B) Sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) under the following conditions: (i) SO 2 pollution control equipment has been installed. (ii) A monitor is required to determine compliance with either: of the following: (AA) 326 IAC 12; or (BB) a new construction permit or operating permitrequired under 326 IAC 2. (C) Nitrogen oxide (NO
x ) under the following conditions: (i) NO
x pollution control equipment has been installed. (ii) A monitor is required to determine compliance with either: of the following: (AA) 326 IAC 12; or (BB) a new construction permit or operating permitrequired under 326 IAC 2. (D) The percent oxygen (O 2 ) or carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) if measurements of O 2 or CO 2 in the flue gas are required to convert either SO 2 or NO
x continuous monitoring data, or both, to units of the emission limitation for the particular facility. emissions unit. (3) Sulfuric acid plants or production facilities of greater than three hundred (300) tons per day acid production capacity shall monitor SO 2 for each sulfuric acid producing facility emissions unit within the source. (4) Petroleum refinery catalyst regenera tors for fluid bed catalytic cracking un its of greater than twenty thousand (20,000) barrels or eight hundred forty thousand (840,000) gallons per day fresh feed capacity shall monitor opacity for each regenerator within the source. (5) Portland cement plants shall monitor opacity at the following facilities: emissions units: (A) Kilns. (B) Clinker coolers. (6) Facilities Sources or emissions units that combust sewage sludge shall monitor from the effluent gas exiting the incinerator the following: (A) Total hydrocarbons. (B) Oxygen. (C) Moisture, unless an alternative method is approved by the department and the U.S. EPA.Drm #05-330 Compliance Monitoring December 1, 2010

9 (D) Temperature. (7) Sources or emissions units making coke from coal shall monitor op acity on the underfire stack associated with each coke oven battery. (8) Facilities Emissions units in Clark and Floyd counties that have potential to emit NO
x greater than or equal to forty (40) tons per year and are located at sources that have potential to emit NO
x greater than or equal to one hundred (100) tons per year shall install NO
x continuous emission monitors as described in 326 IAC 10-1.

(c) Upon approval by the department, the owner or op erator of an emissions unit required to continuously monitor opacity under this section may be exempted from the requirement to install, certify, and operate a COMS if: (1) a particulate CEMS for measuring PM emissions is used to demonstrate continuous compliance with any applicable emissions limitation; and (2) the particulate CEMS is installed, certified, op erated, and maintained on the affected source in accordance with the requirements of Performance Speci fication 11 (PS-11)* and Procedure 2 of 40 CFR 60, Appendix F*.

(d) The department may require, as a condition of a construction or operating permit issued under 326 IAC 2

- 1

, 326 IAC 2-1.1, 326 IAC 2-2, 326 IAC 2-3, 326 IAC 2-7, 326 IAC 2-8, or 326 IAC 2-9 that the owner or operator of a new or existing source of air emissions monitor emi ssions to ensure compliance with the following: (1) An emission limitation or standard established in one (1) of the permits listed in this subsection. (2) Permit requirements. (3) Monitoring requirements in 326 IAC 7.

(e) Unless explicitly stated otherwise, nothing in this rule shall: (1) excuse the owner or operator of a source or emissions unit from any monitoring, record keeping, or reporting requirement that applies under any provision of the CAA or state statutes or regulations; rules; or (2) restrict the authority of the department to impose additional or more restrictive monitoring, record keeping, testing, or reporting requirements on any owner or operator of a source or emissions unit under any other provision of the CAA, including Section 114(a)(1), or state statutes or regulations, rules, as applicable.

(f) Within one hundred eighty (180) days of startup or, for asource existing on the effective date of this rule, within three hundred sixty

- five (365) days of becoming an affected facility underthis rule, All continuous monitoring systems shall be installed and operational and have the certification testing complete pursuant to under section 3 of this rule within one hundred eighty (180) days of start-up of the emissions unit.

*Copies of these documents may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-5-1; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2064; filed Dec 20, 2001, 4:30 p.m.: 25 IR 1596; erra ta filed Jan 7, 2002, 2:20 p.m.: 25 IR 1644)

SECTION 5. 326 IAC 3-5-2 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-5-2 Minimum performanc e and operating specifications Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4-3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 2. Owners and operators of monitoring equipment in stalled to comply with this rule shall comply with the performance specifications and op erating requirements as follows: (1) Performance specifications set forth in 40 CFR 60, Appendix B*, shall be used to certify monitoring equipment installed pursuant to this rule; however, where reference is made to the administrator in 40 CFR 60, Appendix B*, the term "department" shall be inserted for purposes of this rule, and where continuous emissionsDrm #05-330 Compliance Monitoring December 1, 2010

10 monitors were installed prior to March 1983 for measurin g opacity, the performance specifications in 40 CFR 60, Appendix B*, 1982 Edition, shall apply. (2) Cycling times, which include the total time a monitori ng system requires to sample, analyze, and record an emission measurement, shall be as follows: (A) Continuous monitoring systems for measuring opac ity shall complete a mini mum of one (1) cycle of operation (sampling, analyzing, and data recording) for each successive ten (10) second period. (B) Continuous monitoring systems that measure the following emissions shall complete a minimum of one (1) cycle of operation (sampling, analyzing, and data recording) for each successive fifteen (15) minute measuring period: (i) Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ). (ii) Carbon monoxide (CO). (iii) Hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S). (iv) Oxides of nitrogen (NO
x ). (v) Oxygen (O 2 ). (vi) Sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ). (vii) Total hydrocarbons (THC). (viii) Total reduced sulfur (TRS). (ix) Volatile organic compounds (VOC). (x) Particulate matter (PM). (3) For opacity monitoring when effluent from two (2) or more affected facilities is emissions units are combined before being released to the atmo sphere, the owner or operator may either install a COMS: (A) install acontinuous opacity monitoring system on the combined effluent; or (B) install acontinuous opacity monitoring system comprised of, and capable of combining the signals from, component transmissometers on each effluent stream. Results shall be reported on combined effluent. This requirement shall not apply to facilit ies utilizing emissions units using wet flue gas desulfurization equipment. For facilities emissions units using wet flue gas desulfurization equipment, opacity may be reported on th e combined exhaust or on individual exhausts except as provided for facili ties emissions units affected by an NSPS as described at 40 CFR 60.13(i)*. Compliance for facilities emissions units that opt to report on the individual exhausts shall be determined on the individual exhausts based on data provided in acco rdance with section 7 of this rule. (4) When the effluent from two (2) or more affected facilities emissions units subject to the same emission standard, other than opacity, are combined before being released to the atmosphere, the owner or operator may report the results as requir ed for each affected facility emissions unit or for the combined effluent. (5) Instrument full-scale response or upper limit of conc entration measurement range for all opacity monitoring systems shall be set at one hundred percent (100%) op acity if possible. If the monitoring system is a requirement required by of 40 CFR 60*, 40 CFR 61*, 40 CFR 63*, or 40 CFR 75*, then the appropriate instrument span values and cycling times pursuant to the applicable part sh all be used. In all cases, th e manufacturer's procedures for calibration shall be followed and may result in an upscale maximum response of less than one hundred percent (100%). The minimum instrument full-scale response for gaseous monitoring systems shall be set at two hundred percent (200%) of the expected instrument data display output corresponding to the emission limitation for the facility emissions unit unless a request for an alternative setting that provides the following information is submitted to and approved by the department and U.S. EPA in writing: (A) The proposed alternate instrument span value. (B) The expected range of poll utant measured concentrations. (C) The control device in use. (D) The process to be controlled. (E) The location of the monitor, such as stack or duct. (F) The reason for requesting the a lternate instrument span value. (6) The department and U.S. EPA may approve locations for installing continuous monitoring systems or monitoring devices that vary from locations provided under the performance specifications of 40 CFR 60, Appendix B*, shall be approved by the department and the U.S. EPA upon a demonstration by the owner or operator that installation at altern ative locations will enable accurate and representative measurements.Drm #05-330 Compliance Monitoring December 1, 2010

11 (7) Owners or operators of affected facilities emissions units shall conduct continuous emission monitoring system CEMS performance evaluations, upon the request of the department or U.S. EPA, to demonstrate continuing complian ce of the continuous emission monitoring systems CEMS with performance specifications as follows: (A) A performance evaluation is a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the performance of the continuous emission monitor in terms of: (i) accuracy; (ii) precision; (iii) reliability; (iv) representativeness; and (v) comparability; of the data acquired by the monitoring system. (B) The department or U.S. EPA may request owners or operators of affected facilities, emissions units, as defined described in section 1(b) of this rule, to conduct continuous emission monito ring system CEMS performance evaluations if the department has reason to believe, based on review of monitoring data, quality assurance data, inspections, or other information, that the continuous emission monitoring system CEMS is malfunctioning or may be providing invalid data over an extended period. (C) The owner or operator of an affected emissions unit shall submit a written report containing the complete information of the performance evaluations shall be furnished to the department within fortyfive (45) days after the test date. The department or U.S. EPA may conduct performance evaluations of the continuous emission monitoring systems CEMS at any time in order to verify the continued compliance of the systems with the performance specifications. *These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-5- 2; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2066; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1566; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 32)

SECTION 6. 326 IAC 3-5-3 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-5-3 Monitor system certification Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4-3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 3. Monitor system certificati on requirements apply to sources and or facilities emissions units subject to this rule as follows: (1) The owner or operator shall conduct the applicable performance specifications tests in accordance with the procedures specified in 40 CFR 60*, or other applicable federal regulations, for the required monitoring system as follows: (A) Not later than one hundred eighty (180) days after a facility emissions unit start-up or initial monitor installation date. (B) Not later than forty-five (45) emissions unit operating days after the date of monitor replacement, date, or significant monitor repair as described in IDEM's Quality Assurance Compliance Branch Continuous Emissions Monitoring Guidance Manual, Chapter Chapters 20 (dated June 20

, 1997)** 1 and 2* (December 1999), which affects the ability of the analyzer to function date. measure emissions accurately. (2) The owner or operator shall notify the department in writing as follows: (A) No less than fourteen (14) days in advance of the start of continuous opacity monitor (COM) certification. (B) No less than thirty-five (35) days in advance of the certification of a gaseous monitoring system. (3) The owner or operator shall submit all of the required test data and informat ion in the form of a written report to the department for review and approval within forty-five (45) days of completion of the performanceDrm #05-330 Compliance Monitoring December 1, 2010

12 specification test. (4) The department shall issue a written notice of certifica tion status upon review of the complete certification test report. A required monitoring system is certified when the department issues a certification letter stating that the required monitoring system, including all applicable components, has satisfactorily met all federal and state monitoring requirements. (5) The department may decertify a requir ed monitoring system if an audit or performance evaluation reveals that such the monitoring system or a component thereof does not meet applicable performance specifications or requirements. The owner or operator shall repeat the certification process for the required monitoring system within forty-five (45) days of the date of the department's decertificati on of the required monitoring system.

*This document is *These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Manage ment, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204.

**This document is incorporated by reference. Copies are available forreview and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of AirQuality, IndianaGover nment Center

- North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IA C 3-5-3; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2067; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 33)

SECTION 7. 326 IAC 3-5-4 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-5-4 Standard operating procedures Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4-3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 4. (a) The owneroroperator of each af fected facility specified in section 1(b) of this rule, any facility subject

to 326 IAC 12, or any other facility required to monitor emissions on acontinuous basis shall submit to the department, Within ninety (90) days after monitor installation, a complete, written continuous monitoring standard operating procedures procedure (SOP) must be submitted to the department by the owner or operator of: (1) each affected source or emissions unit sp ecified in section 1(a) of this rule; or (2) any other source or emissions unit required to monitor emissions on a continuous basis.

(b) If revisions are made to the SOP, the owner or operator must submit updates shall be submitted to the department biennially. within two (2) years of the revisions.

(c) At a minimum, the SOP shall describe complete step-by-step procedures and operations as follows: (1) A description of the facility emissions unit monitored. (2) A listing of the following for each monitor: (A) Each monitor's brand. (A) Manufacturer's name. (B) Model number. (C) Serial number. (D) Monitoring location. (E) Data handling and acquisition system. (3) Examples of all reporting and log forms. (4) Record keeping and reporting procedures that include the following: (A) Reporting of instrument precision and accuracy. (B) Reporting of emissions data. (5) Methods and procedures for analysis and data acquisition. (6) Calibration procedures that include the following: (A) Calibration error limits and linearity.Drm #05-330 Compliance Monitoring December 1, 2010

13 (B) Calibration gas type, gas quality, and traceability to the National Institute of Standards and Technology. (C) Calibration frequency. (D) Criteria for recalibration, and an alysis procedures to periodically verify the accuracy of span and calibration standards. (7) Operation procedures that include: (A) daily procedures; (B) quantifying and recording daily zero (0) and high level drift that meet the requirements of: (i) 40 CFR 60, Appendix B*, Performance Specification 2, Section 4.2; or (ii) other applicable regulations; and (C) other operating parameter checks indicating correct operational status. (8) Quality control and quality assurance procedures that include the following: (A) A statement of quality policy and objectives. (B) Organization and responsibilities description. (C) Calibration and span and zero (0) drift criteria. (D) Excessive drift criteria. (E) Corrective action for excessive drift. (F) Precision and accuracy audits. (G) Corrective action for acc uracy audits failure. (H) Data validity criteria. (I) Participation in department audits. (J) Data recording and calculation audits. (9) Preventive maintenance pr ocedures and corrective maintenance pro cedures that include those procedures taken to ensure continuous operation and to minimize malfunctions. (10) A listing of the manufacturer's recommended spare parts inventory.

(b) (d) If a facility emissions unitowner or operator fails to submit a SOP or submits a SOP that fails to address the factors procedures and operations provided under subsection (a), (c), the department may require a performance evaluation pursuant to section 2 of this rule.

*This document is incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana G overnment Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-5- 4; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2068; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 34)

SECTION 8. 326 IAC 3-5-5 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-5-5 Quality assurance requirements Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4-3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 5. (a) Except where for “affected units” under 40 CFR 75* is applicable for affected facilities sources or that are also emissions units under the acid rain program subject to this rule , quality assurance requirements specified in this section and 40 CFR 60*, Appendix F, apply to continuous emission monitors that monitor the following: (1) Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ). (2) Carbon monoxide (CO). (3) Hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S). (4) Nitrogen oxide (NO
x ). (5) Oxygen (O 2 ). (6) Sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ). (7) Total hydrocarbons (THC).Drm #05-330 Compliance Monitoring December 1, 2010

14 (8) Total reduced sulfur (TRS). (9) Volatile organic compounds (VOC). (10) Particulate matter (PM).

(b) Facilities Emissions units that are also subject to 40 CFR 75* shall follow the quality assurance procedures of 40 CFR 75* and report the results in accordance with subsection (e) (f).

(c) Quality control (QC) requirements for continuous opacity monitoring systems COMS are as follows: (1) For calibration drift (CD) assessment, the COMS sh all be checked at least once daily. The CD shall be quantified and recorded at zero (0) (or low level) an d upscale level opacity. The COMS shall be adjusted whenever the CD exceeds the specifica tion of 40 CFR 60, Appendix B*, Perf ormance Specification 1 (PS-1), and the COMS shall be declared out of control when the CD exceeds twice the specification of PS-1. Corrective actions, followed by a validating CD assessment, ar e required when the COMS is out of control. (2) For fault indicators assessment, the fault lamp indicators, data acquisition system error messages, and other system self-diagnostic indicators shall be checked at l east daily. Appropriate corrective actions shall be taken when the COMS is operating outside the preset limits. (3) For performance audits, ch ecks of the individual COMS components and factors affecting the accuracy of the monitoring data, as described in this subdivision, shall be conducted, at a minimum, on a calendar quarter basis. The absolute minimum checks included in the performa nce audit are as follows: (A) The status of the optical alignment of the monitor components shall be checked and recorded according to the procedure specified by the mon itor manufacturer. Monitor components must be realigned as necessary. (B) The apparent effluent opacity shall be compared and recorded before and after cleaning each of the exposed optical surfaces. Th e total optical surface dust accumulati on shall be determined by summing up the apparent reductions in opacity for all of the optical surfaces th at are cleaned. Caution should be employed in performing this check since fluctuations in effluent opacity occurring during the cleaning cycle may adversely affect the results. (C) The zero (0) and upscale respon se errors shall be determined and recorded according to the CD procedures. The errors are defined as the difference (in percent opacity) between the correct value and the observed value for the zero (0) and high level calibration checks. (D) The value of the zero (0) compensation applied at the time of the audit shall be calculated as equivalent opacity, corrected to stack exit conditio ns, according to the proced ures specified by the manufacturer. The compensation applied to the effluent recorded by the monitor system shall be recorded. (E) The optical pathlength correction ratio (OPLR) shall be computed from the monitor pathlength and stack exit diameter and shall be compared, and th e difference recorded, to the monitor setup OPLR value. The stack exit correlation error shall be determined as the absolute value of the difference between the measured value and the correct value, expressed as a percentage of the correct value. (F) A three-point calibration error test of the COMS shall be conducted. Three (3) neutral density filters meeting the requirements of PS-1 sh all be placed in the COMS light beam path. The monitor response shall be independently recorded from the COMS permanent data recorder. Make A total of five (5) nonconsecutive readings for each filter shall be made. The low-range, mid-range, and high-range calibration error results shall be computed as th e mean difference and ninety-five percent (95%) confidence interval for the difference between the ex pected and the actual responses of the monitor as corrected to stack exit conditions. These values shall be calculated using the procedure of PS-1, Section 8.0. The following are requirements for these values: (i) The calibration error test requires the insta llation of an external calibration audit device (zero-jig). The zero-jig shall be adjusted to provide the same zer o (0) response as the monitor's simulated zero (0). (ii) Use calibration attenuators, that is, neutral de nsity filters or screens, with values that have been determined according to PS-1, Section 7.1.3, "Attenuator Calibration", and produce simulated opacities (as corrected to stack exit co nditions) in the ranges listed in Table 1-2 inDrm #05-330 Compliance Monitoring December 1, 2010

15 PS-1. (iii) The stability of the attenuator values shall be checked at least once per year according to the procedures specified in PS-1. The attenuat ors shall be recalibrated if the stability checks indicate a change of two percent (2%) opacity or greater. (4) The following are requirements for monitor acceptance criteria: (A) The following criteria are to be used for determining to determine if the COMS audit results are acceptable: TABLE 1. PERFORMANCE AUDIT CRITERIA
Stack Exit Correlation Error ≤ 2 percent Zero and Upscale Responses ≤ 2 percent opacity
Zero Compensation ≤ 4 percent opacity Optical Alignment Misalignment error
≤ 2 percent opacity Optical Surface Dust Accumulation ≤ 4 percent opacity
Calibration Error ≤ 3 percent opacity (B) The COMS is out of control whenever the re sults of a quarterly performance audit indicate noncompliance with any of the performance assessment cr iteria of Table 1 in clause (A). If the COMS is out of control, the owner or operator must shall take the action necessary to eliminate the problem. Following corrective action, the source or emissions unitowner or operator must shall reconduct the appropriate failed portion of the audit and other applicable portions to determine whether the COMS is operating properly and within specifications. The COMS owner or operator shall record both audit results showing the COMS to be out of control and the results following corrective action. COMS data obtained during any out of control period may not be used forco mpliance determination; the datamay be used foridentifying periods where there has been a failure to meet quality assurance and control criteria. (C) Repeated audit failures, that is, out of control conditions resulting from revealed in the quarterly audits, indicate that the QC procedures are inadequa te or the COMS is incapable of providing quality data. The source or emissions unit owner or operator shall: (i) increase the frequency of the above QC procedures in this subsection until the performance criteria are maintained; or (ii) modify or replace the COMS whenever tw o (2) consecutive quar ters of unacceptable performance occur. (5) The performance audit calculations contained in PS-1, Section 8 shall be followed.

(d) Except where 40 CFR 75* is applicable for affected facilities emissions units under the acid rain program, and except for peaking units as defined in 326 IAC 3-4-1(13), quality control requirements for flow monitoring systems are as follows: (1) For CD assessment, the flow monitoring system sh all be checked at least once daily. The CD shall be quantified and recorded at zero (0) (or low level) and upscale level. The flow monitoring systems shall be adjusted whenever the CD exceeds the specification of 40 CFR 60, Appendix B, Performance Specification 6 (PS-6)*, and the flow monitoring systems shall be de clared out of control when the CD exceeds twice the specification of PS-6. Corrective actions , followed by a validating CD assessment, are required when the flow monitoring system is out of control. (2) An annual relative accuracy test.

(e) A peaking unit as defined in 326 IAC 3-4-1(13) shall comply with the following quality control requirements: (1) The owner or operator of a peaking unit, based on information submitted by the designated representative in the monitori ng plan, shall comply with one (1) of the following: (A) Meet the general operating requi rements in 40 CFR 75.10* for a NO X CEMS. (B) Provide information satisfacto ry to the commissioner using the procedure specified in 40 CFRDrm #05-330 Compliance Monitoring December 1, 2010

16 75, Appendix E* for estimating hourly NO X emission rate, subject to the following: (i) If, in the years after certification of an excepted monitoring system under 40 CFR 75, Appendix E*, an emissions unit's operations ex ceed a capacity factor of twenty percent (20%) in any calendar year or exceed a capa city factor of ten and zero-tenths percent (10.0%) averaged over three (3) years, the owner or operator shall install, certify, and operate a NO X -diluent CEMS no later than December 31 of the following calendar year. (ii) If the required CEMS has not been installe d and certified by the date in item (i), the owner or operator shall report the maximum potential NO X emission rate, as defined in 40 CFR 72.2*, for each unit operating hour, starting with the first unit operating hour after the deadline and continuing until th e CEMS has been provisionally certified. (2) The owner or operator of a peaking unit shall conduct a relative accuracy test audit (RATA) on any required CEMS as follows: (A) Except for mercury monitoring systems and as ot herwise specified in 40 CFR 75.21(a)(6)*, 40 CFR 75.21(a)(7)*, or 40 CFR 75, Appendix B, Section 2.3.1.2*, RATA sh all be performed once every two (2) successive qualit y assurance (QA) operating quarters for each primary and redundant backup: (i) SO 2 pollutant concentration monitor; (ii) flow monitor; (iii) CO 2 emissions concentration monitor, including O 2 monitors used to determine CO 2 emissions; (iv) CO 2 or O 2 diluent monitor used to determine heat input; (v) moisture monitoring system; (vi) NO X concentration monitoring system; (vii) NO X -diluent CEMS; or (viii) SO 2 -diluent CEMS. (B) For each primary and redundant backup mercury concentration monitoring system and each sorbent trap monitoring system, RATAs shall be performed once every four (4) successive QA operating quarters. (C) A calendar quarter that does not qualify as a QA operating quarter shall be excluded in determining the deadline for the next RATA. (D) Not more than eight (8) successive calendar quar ters shall elapse after the quarter in which a RATA was last performed without a subse quent RATA having been conducted. (E) If a RATA has not been completed by the end of the eighth calendar qu arter since the quarter of the last RATA, then the RATA must be completed within a seven hundred twenty (720) unit, or stack, operating hour grace period, as provided in 40 CFR 75, Appendix B, Section 2.3.3,* following the end of the eighth successive elapsed calendar quarter, or data from the CEMS will become invalid. (F) The relative accuracy test audit frequency of a CEMS may be reduced, as specified in 40 CFR 75, Appendix B, Section 2.3.1.2*, for primary or redundant backup monitoring systems that qualify for less frequent testing. (G) All required RATAs shall be performed in a ccordance with the applicable procedures and provisions in 40 CFR 75, Appendix A, Sections 6. 5 through 6.5.2.2* and 40 CFR 75, Appendix B, Sections 2.3.1.3* and 2.3.1.4*. (H) For a CO monitor and any other applicable monitor as determined by the commissioner, a RATA shall be performed in accordance wi th the requirements of this subdivision.

(e) (f) Reporting requirements for perf ormance audits are as follows: (1) Owners or operators of facilities emissions units required to conduct: (A) cylinder gas audit; (B) relative accuracy test audit; or (C) continuous opacity monitor calibration error audit; on continuous emission monitors shall prepare a written re port of the results of the performance audit for eachDrm #05-330 Compliance Monitoring December 1, 2010

17 calendar quarter, or for other periods required by the department. The owner or operator shall submitquarterly reports shall be submitted to the department within thirty (30) calendar days after the end of each quarter. (2) The performance audit report shall contain the following information: (A) Plant and monitor information, including the following: (i) The plant name and address. (ii) The monitor brand or manufacturer's name, model, and serial number. (iii) The monitor span. (iv) The monitor location. forexample, duct, boiler, unit, or stack designation. (B) Performance audit information, including the following: (i) The auditor's name. (ii) A copy of the audit standard's certification. for example, the vendor's Protocol 1 certification, or neutral density filter certification. (iii) All data used to calculate the audit results. (iv) The audit results and an indication if the monitor passed or failed the audit. If the performance audit results show the CEMS or COMS to be out of control, the CEMS or COMS owner or operator must shall report both the audit results showing the CEMS or COMS to be out of control and the results of the audit following corrective action showing the COMS to be operating within specification. (v) Any corrective actions performed as the result of a failed audit.

(f) If (g) Whenever a relative accuracy test audit of any continuo us emission monitor listed in subsection (a) or (e) is performed, the department must be notified in accordance with the protocol requirements of 326 IAC 3-6-2 at least thirty-five (35) days prior to the audit.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-5- 5; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2069; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 34)

SECTION 9. 326 IAC 3-5-6 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-5-6 Record keeping requirements Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4-3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 6. (a) On and afte r the certification of a monitoring system, the owner or operator of a source or emissions unit subject to this rule shall maintain records, including raw data, of all monitoring data and supporting information for a minimum of five (5) years from the date of any of the following: (1) A monitoring sample. (2) A measurement. (3) A test. (4) A certification. (5) A report. (6) Any other activity required under this article.

(b) The records described in subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) All documentation relating to: (A) design, installation, and testing of all elements of the monitoring system; and (B) required corrective action or compliance plan activities. (2) All maintenance logs, calibration checks, an d other required quality assurance activities. (3) All records of corrective and preventive action.Drm #05-330 Compliance Monitoring December 1, 2010

18 (4) A log of plant operations, including emission unit or monito ring system downtime with the following information: (A) Date of facility emissions unit or monitoring system downtime. (B) Time of commencement and completion of each downtime. (C) Reason for each downtime. (D) Nature of system repairs and adjustments.

(c) The owner or operator of a source or emissions unit subject to this rule shall maintain the records required by this section at the source or at

such other site, in amannerso that they may be inspected by and make them available to the department or the U.S. EPA if so requested or required. upon request. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-5-6; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2071)

SECTION 10. 326 IAC 3-5-7 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-5-7 Reporting requirements Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4-3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 7. (a) The following reporting requirements apply to sources owner or operator of a source or emissions unit subject to this rule shall submit a monitoring report to the de partment in accordan ce with this section.

(b) The owner or operator shall submit the moni toring report in accordan ce with the following requirements: (1) The owner or operator of sources or emissions units subject to the requirements of section 1 of this rule shall report excess emissions no less frequently than quarterly. For sources required to report the owner or operator of a source or emissions unit for which quarterly such reports are required, the reports shall be: (A) submitted by the facility source or emissions unit owner or operator to the department; and (B) postmarked or delivered by other means no later than thirty (30) calendar days following the last day of the reporting period. (2) If a permit specifies or a rule requires more frequent reports, such the reports shall be: (A) submitted by the facility source or emissions unit owner or operator to the department; and (B) postmarked or delivered by other means no later than fifteen (15) calendar days after the end of each month. (3) Gaseous excess emissions data reports shall be reported using three (3) hour block periods ending at: (A) 03:00; (B) 06:00; (C) 09:00; (D) 12:00; (E) 15:00; (F) 18:00; (G) 21:00; and (H) 24:00; For facilities sources orunless the emissions unitthat must demonstrate compliance hourly (one (1) hour), with a different averaging period as sp ecified by an applicable rule or permit condition, such as, daily (twentyfour (24) hour) average, or thirty (30) day averages, such t he information shall be submitted as part of the quarterly report required in this section.

(4) (c) The monitoring report shall contain the following continuous monitoring information summaries, with all times reported in real time: (A) (1) Monitored facility emission unit operation time during the reporting period. (B) (2) Excess emissions or parameters, as applicable, repor ted in units of the standard, or the applicable parameter unit as follows:Drm #05-330 Compliance Monitoring December 1, 2010

19 (i) (A) Date of excess emissions, or other applicable dates. (ii) (B) Time of commencement and completion for each applicable parameter deviation or excess emission data. (C) (3) Magnitude of each excess emission as follows: (i) (A) For opacity as follows: (AA) (i) The actual percent opacity of all six (6) minute (block) averages exceeding the applicable opacity limit shall be reported. If the an exceedance occurs continuously beyond one (1) six (6) minute period, the percent opacity for each six (6) minute period or the highest six (6) minute average opacity for the entire period shall be reported. (BB) (ii) For department approved opacity averaging times other than six (6) minutes, the actual percent opacity of each averaging period in excess of the applicable limit shall be reported. (CC) (iii) A summary by cause shall be prepared and submitted as part of this report itemizing exceedances by cause. (ii) (B) For gaseous emissions, the excess emissions, in units of the applicable standard, must be reported based on the applicable averaging time, for example, one (1) hourblock, three (3) hour block, three (3) hourrolling, in addition to any other reporting requirements that may be applicable. The averaging time is specified in the applicable federal or state rules, or facility in the operating permit for the emissions unit. (5) (4) Continuous monitoring system instrument downtime, except for zero (0) and span checks, which shall be reported separately, shall include the following: (A) Date of downtime. (B) Time of commencement. (C) Duration of each downtime. (D) Reasons for each downtime. (E) Nature of system repairs and adjustments.

(d) If there are no excess emissions or monitor downtime in a reporting period, the owner or operator of a emissions unit subject to this rule shall submit a report i ndicating that no excess emissions or downtime incidents occurred in the reporting period that includes the start and end dates of the time period. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-5-7; filed Jan 30 , 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2071)

SECTION 11. 326 IAC 3-5-8 IS ADDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-5-8 Operation and Maintenance of continuous emission monitoring and continuous opacity monitoring systems Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4-3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 8. (a) This section applies to the operation and maintenance of CEMS and COMS.

(b) The owner or operator of a CEMS or COMS required by federal or state regulations or permit shall: (1) install; (2) calibrate; (3) maintain; (4) operate; and (5) certify; such CEMS or COMS, and related equi pment in accordance with applicab le federal regulations, this rule, and any applicable permits.

(c) Except for periods when: (1) the affected emissions units is not operating;Drm #05-330 Compliance Monitoring December 1, 2010

20 (2) the affected source or emissions unit is operatin g under a scenario that does not require CEMS or COMS; (3) the CEMS or COMS is experiencing a malfunction; or (4) the owner/operator is conducting CEMS or COMS quality assurance and quality control activities, including, but not limited to: (A) calibration checks; (B) zero and span adjustments; (C) calibration gas audits; or (D) other required qua lity assurance/quality control activities, all CEMS and COMS shall be in continuous operation.

(d) Except as otherwise provided by a rule or prov ided specifically in a permit , if a CEMS or COMS is malfunctioning or will be down for calib ration, maintenance, or repairs for a period of twenty-four (24) hours or more, the owner or operator of the CEMS or COMS sh all perform supplemental moni toring in accordance with the permit.

(e) The owner or operator of the CEMS or COMS shall do the following: (1) Keep records: (A) in accordance with section 6(b) of this rule; and (B) that describe the supplemental monitoring implemented during any downtime to assure compliance with applicable emission limitations. (2) Submit reports, as applicable, in ac cordance with section 7 of this rule. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-5-8)

SECTION 12. 326 IAC 3-6-1 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-6-1 Applicabilit y; test procedures Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4-3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 1. This rule applies to any facility emissions unit emissions testing performed to determine compliance with applicable emission limitations contained in this title, or for any other purpose requiring review and approval by the department. (such as an alternate emission factor determination). The owner or operator of a source s or emissions unit shall conduct emission tests subject to this rule shall be conducted in accordance with any ap plicable procedures and analysis methods specified in 40 CFR 51*, 40 CFR 60*, 40 CFR 61*, 40 CFR 63*, 40 CFR 75*, or other procedures approved by the department and U.S. EPA.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-6- 1; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2072; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 36)

SECTION 13. 326 IAC 3-6-2 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-6-2 Source sampling protocols Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4-3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 2. (a) When an emissions test is to be performed by any person other than the department, the source or emissions unit owner or operator shall complete a test protocol form and submit the test protocol form to the department not later than thirty-five (35) days prior to the intended test date unless more notice is required under the applicableDrm #05-330 Compliance Monitoring December 1, 2010

21 program. Such rule requires additional notice. The test protocol shall: (1) be on a form approved by the department; or sha ll (2) contain information equivalent to that required on the form approved by the department. The department shall evaluate and approve the test protocol prior it to being implemented. If the department does not notify the owner or operator prior to the test date that the protocol has not been approved, the protocol is deemed approved.

(b) After evaluating the completed test protocol form, the department may: (1) inspect the test site; or (2) require additional conditions, including, but not limited to: (A) requiring reasonable modifications to the stack or duct to obtain accept able test conditions; (B) requiring additional tests to allow for adverse conditions; such as interferences, nonsteady, or cyclic
processes; (C) keeping process operating parameter records, operating logs, or charts during the test; (D) placing conditions on control equipment operation to make the operation of control equipment representative of normal operation; or (E) recording specified control equipment operating parameters during the test.

(c) If the department requires modification to: (1) test methods; (2) analytical methods; (3) operational parameters; or (4) other matters included in the emissions test protocol; the department shall notify the source or emissions unit owner or operator and the testing firm by letter or telephone not later than twenty-one (21) days prior to the test date.

(d) If the source or emissions unit owner oroperator or test firm desires to make a minor change to previously submitted procedures or conditions, the department shall be notified of such the minor change as soon as practicable prior to the intended emissions test date. Such The minor changes shall not be made unless approved by the department prior to the emission test.

(e) Reasonable changes in th e emissions test protocol that result from emergency conditions during the test shall be approved by the department if a department staff person is available at the test site, before the test may proceed.

(f) Post-test approval may be granted based on reas onable changes resulting fromemergency or reasonably unforeseeable conditions during the test. (g) The department reserves the right to conduct any portion of the reference method tests using equipment supplied by the department. Notice of acceptable test procedures shall be given to the owner or operator of the source or emissions unit and its testing representative.

(h) The source or emissions unit owner or operator shall schedule an actual test date and time period and notify the department not later than fourteen (14) days prior to the actual test date. In the event that a previously scheduled test must be canceled and rescheduled, the owner or operator of the source or emissions unit shall notify the department no less than fourteen (14) days in advance of the rescheduled test date. Tests rescheduled for less than fourteen (14) days after notifying the department of the rescheduled test date mustbe approved by the department. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-6-2; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2072)

SECTION 14. 326 IAC 3-6-3 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-6-3 Emission testing Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4-3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17Drm #05-330 Compliance Monitoring December 1, 2010

22 Sec. 3. (a) Department staff may obse rve field test procedures and source or emissions unit operation during the emission test.

(b) The owner or operator of a source or emissions unit shall conduct all emission tests shall be conducted as follows: (1) While The facility emissions unit being tested is shall be operating according to clauses (A) or (B), except as allowed under clause (C), as follows: (A) At a minimum, ninety-five percent (95%) to one hundred percent (100%) of its the permitted maximum emissions unit operating capacity description. (B) Under conditions of worst case emissions, an d if the worst case emission condition is not known, then the worst case emission condition sh all be assumed to be the maximum process or operating rate of the emissions unit as liste d in the permit's emissions unit description. (C) Under other capacities or cond itions as specified in an app licable requirement or approved by the department. As used in this clause, "capacity" means the design capaci ty of the emissions unit or other operating capacities agreed to by the owner or operator of the emissions unit and the department, including, but not limited to, proce ss conditions when the department believes that changes in the operating capacities or operating conditions have the potential to affect emission levels. (2) Underconditions representative of normal operations. (3) Underother capacities or conditions specified and approved by the department. As used in this subdivision, "capacity" means the design capacity of the facility orotheroperating ca pacities agreed to by the source and the department. (2) All test runs for a given pollutant shall be co nducted within twenty-four (24) hours unless process variables or mandatory test lengths of greater than two (2) hours make this impracticable. In these cases, the testing shall be conducted on consecutive days. Other periods or duration may be approved by the commissioner.

(c) Facilities E missions units subject to 326 IAC 12, New Source Performance Standards, 326 IAC 14, or 326 IAC 20 Hazardous AirPo llutants, shall be tested under conditions as specified in the applicable provision for that facility emissions unit in 40 CFR 60*, 40 CFR 61*, or 40 CFR 63* and this rule where appropriate.

(d) The owner or operator of a source or emissions unitshall make available at the test site calibration results of the various sampling components. The information shall include the following: (1) The date or dates the test was performed. (2) The methods used. (3) The calibration data. (4) The results. All components requiring calibration shall be calibrated within sixty (60) days prior to the actual test date. Post-test calibrations shall be performed on the components not later than forty-five (45) days after the actual test date. Components requiring calibration are listed in the federal test methods specified in section 5 of this rule.

(e) The department may perform or require the performance of audits of equipment or procedures associated with the test series up to the time of the actual performance of the test, between test runs, or following the test series. The department reserves the right to perfor m or observe all associated analyses.

(f) The original or a photocopy of the raw field data generated during the test series shall be provided to the department observer upon request if such the request may be reasonably met under the existing circumstances.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North SenateDrm #05-330 Compliance Monitoring December 1, 2010

23 Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-6- 3; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2073; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 37)

SECTION 15. 326 IAC 3-6-4 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-6-4 Reporting Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4-3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 4. (a) All emission tests for which a test protocol form was submitted pursuant to the department under section 2 of this rule shall be reported to the department in the form of an emission test report containing the following information: (1) The reported testing methods and results certified as true and accurate and in compliance with this rule by the person responsible for conducting the emissions test. (2) Information regarding the test, including the following: (A) A stack test result summary table that compares the measured emissions, in units consistent with the applicable emissions limitations, to the emissions limitations. (A) (B) A description of the facility orfacilitie s emissions unit or units being tested. (B) (C) The date or dates on which the test was performed. (C) (D) The type of tests conducted. (D) (E) The type of process and control equipment utilized. (E) (F) The source name and location. (F) (G) The purpose of the tests. (G) (H) The test participants and their titles. (3) Tabulated data and results, including the following: (A) The process weight rate or heat input rate. (B) The referenced or derived conversion factors. (C) The stack gas flow rate. (D) Measured emissions given in units consiste nt with the applicable emission limitations. (E) The average value of emissions from any cont inuous gaseous emissions monitoring system in units consistent with the applicab le emission limitations if applicab le to the pollutant being tested. (E) (F) If applicable, visible emissions observations or six (6) minute average continuous opacity monitor readings. (F) Average value of emissions from any continuous gaseous emissions monitoring system in units consistent with the app licable emission limitations if applicable to the pollutant being tested. (4) A description of process and control devices, including the following: (A) A process flow diagram. (B) The maximum design capacities. (C) A fuel analysis and heat value for heat input rate determinations. (D) The process and control equipment operating conditions. (E) A discussion of variations from normal plant operations. (F) The stack height. (G) The exit diameter. (H) The volumetric flow rate (cubic feet per minute). (I) The exit temperature. (J) The exit velocity. (5) A description of sampling methods used, including the following: (A) A brief discussion of the analyti cal procedures with justifications for any variance from reference method procedures. (B) Specification of the following: (i) The number of sampling points. (ii) The time per point.Drm #05-330 Compliance Monitoring December 1, 2010

24 (iii) The total sampling time per run. (C) A cross-sectional diagram of the sampling site showing sampling points. (D) A diagram showing the following: (i) The stack dimensions. (ii) The sampling location. (iii) The distance from the nearest flow disturbance upstream and downstream of the sampling points. (iv) The diagram of the sampling train. (6) Sampling and analytical procedur es used, including the following: (A) Results and calculations, including the following: (i) Units consistent with the a pplicable emission limitation. (ii) One (1) complete calculation using actua l data for each type of test performed. (iii) Raw production data signed by the source official. (iv) Photocopies of all actual field data. (B) A laboratory report, including the following: (i) The chain of custody. (ii) Copies of all calibration data for equipment used in sampling as described in section 3(d) of this rule. (C) Applicable rules and regulations showing the emission limitations. (D) For particulate matter tests, If applicable, copies of visible emissions evaluations or opacity monitor readings. (E) Copies of any continuous gaseous emissions monitoring system readings for gaseous pollutant tests.

(b) The owner or operator of a source or emissions unit shall submit all emission test reports must be received by to the department not later than forty-five (45) days af ter the completion of the testing. An extension may be granted by the department if the owner or operator of the source or emissions unitsubmits to the department areasonable written explanation for the requested extension not later than five (5) days prior to the end of the initial fortyfive (45) day period. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-6-4; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2073)

SECTION 16. 326 IAC 3-6-5 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-6-5 Specific testing pr ocedures; particulate matter; PM 10 ; PM 2.5 ; sulfur dioxide; nitrogen oxides; volatile organic compounds Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4-3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 5. (a) Tests for particulate matter tests (PM), PM 10 , and PM 2.5 shall be conducted in accordance with the following procedures: (1) For PM: 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 5*, 5A*, 5B*, 5C*, 5D*, 5E*, or 5F*, or Method 17*, as applicable, or other procedures approved by the department and U.S. EPA. (2) For PM 10 and PM 2.5 : 40 CFR 51, Appendix M, Method 201* or 201A*, and 202*. The measurement of condensible PM 10 using the procedures described in Method 2 02* is not required if the applicable emission limitation is contained at 326 IAC 6.8-2, unless otherwise specified by 326 IAC 6.5 or 326 IAC 6.8. 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 5*, in conjunction with Method 202*, may also be used, subject to the approval of the department and U.S. EPA. Other procedures to measure PM 10 and PM 2.5 may be approved by the department and U.S. EPA. (2) (3) Visible emissions (VE) evaluations shall be performed in conjunction with a particulat e emissions PM, PM 10 , PM 2.5 , or other mass emission rate test of air pollutants, as required by the department. The VE evaluations shall be conducted by a qualified observer in accordance w ith the procedures contained in 326 IAC 5-1-4. VE readings shall be continuously recorded for at least thirty (30) minutes per hour of sampling time for each sampling repetition, unless a longer time is otherwise mandated by federal regulation. A waiver from this requirement may be granted by the on

- site department staff person or on-site department staff person ifDrm #05-330 Compliance Monitoring December 1, 2010

25 adverse conditions exist that would invalidate the VE readings. Waivers from this requirement may be granted by the department for emissions units operating with a PM CEMS. Complete waivers from the requirement to conduct VE readings during a compliance test may not be granted to facilities for the emissions unit required to complete opacity testing pursuant to 40 CFR 60.8* or 40 CFR 63 . Facilities Emissions units equipped with continuous opacity monitors may submit the six (6) minute integrated readings of such the monitors during the sampling period, instead of performing VE evaluations, provided: (A) the monitoring system meets th e performance specifications as sp ecified in 40 CFR 60, Appendix B*, and is, or will be, certified by the department; and (B) the monitor readings submitted with the test include a zero (0) and upscale calibration check before the first test run and following the end of the final run; and (C) if more than one (1) day of testing is required to complete the three (3) runs, the zero (0) and span checks shall be performed at the beginning of each day's testing and at the conclusion of each day's final run. (3) (4) At least three (3) repetitions of the test shall be performed under consistent facility emissions unit operating conditions unless otherwise allowed by the department. For boiler emissions testing, at least one (1) of the three (3) repetitions shall be conducted during a normal sootblowing cycle that is consistent with frequency and duration normally experienced. (4) (5) At Richmond Power and Light's Whitewater Generating Station, when sootblowing occurs during one (1) of the three (3) repetitions, emission test results shall be evaluated using either a time weighted averaging period (TWAP) or a straight averaging technique. When using TWAP, the following equation shall be used to ensure proper weighting of an intermittent cleaning cycle perfor mance test run regardless of the length of the cleaning cycle and regardless of the number and duration of the test runs made on the unit. When using TWAP, the representative pounds per hour of particulate emissions shall be calculated using the following equation:

Where: E = Pounds per hour of particulate emissions.
E cc = Average E of sample containing cleaning cycle.
E ncc = Average E of sample containing no cleaning cycle. A = Hours of cleaning cycle operation during sample. B = Hours with no cleaning cycle operation during sample. R = Average hours of operation per twenty-four (24) hours. S = Average hours of cleaning cycle operation per twenty-four (24) hours. (5) (6) Only those fuels representative of normal fuel quality used during normal operations shall be combusted. (6) (7) During each repetition, each sampling point shall be sampled for a minimum of two (2) minutes. (7) (8) The total test time per repetition shall be no less than sixty (60) minutes. (8) (9) The total sample volume per repetition shall be no less than thirty (30) dry standard cubic feet (dscf). (9) (10) The total particulate weight collected from the sampling nozzle, probe, cyclone (if used), filter holder (front half), filter, and connecting glassware, and, if required in subdivision (2), the impinger catch, shall be reported to the department and U.S. EPA. Particulate analysis of the impingercatch is not required, unless specified by the department.

(b) The owner or operator shall conductsulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) tests shall be conducted in accordance with the following procedures: (1) 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6*, 6A*, or 6C*, or 8*, as applicable, or other procedures approved by the department and U.S. EPA. (2) At least three (3) repetitions of two (2) samples, each according to 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6* or 6A*, or6C*, or three (3) repetitions according to 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6C* or 8*, performed under identical facility emissions unit operating conditions, shall constitute a test. For boiler emissions testing, only those fuels representative of fuel quality du ring normal operations shall be combusted.Drm #05-330 Compliance Monitoring December 1, 2010

26 (3) During each of the repetitions for 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 8*, each sampling point shall be sampled foraminimum of two (2) minutes. (4) (3) The total test time per repetition shall be as follows: (A) For tests using 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6* or 6A*, or6C*, a minimum of twenty (20) minutes per run with a thirty (30) minute interval between each run. (B) For tests using 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6C*, a minimum of sixty (60) minutes per

run. (B) (C) For tests using 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 8*, a minimum of sixty (60) minutes per run, with the following criteria: (i) During each of the repetitions, each sa mpling point shall be sampled for a minimum of two (2) minutes. (5) (ii) The total sample volume per repetition under 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 8*, shall be no less than forty (40) dry standard cubic feet (dscf). (iii) During each of the repeti tions, the sample rate shall not exceed one (1) cubic foot per minute (cfm).

(c) The owner or operator shall conduct nitrogen oxide (NO
x ) tests shall be conducted according to the following procedures: (1) 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 7*, 7A*, 7B*, 7C*, or 7E*, as applicable, or other procedures approved by the department and U.S. EPA. (2) For Methods 7*, 7A*, 7B*, or 7C*, at least three (3) repetitions of four (4) samples each shall constitute a

test. (3) For Method 7E*, three (3) test runs, each a minimum of sixty (60) minutes, shall constitute a test.

(d) The owner or operator shall conductvolatile organic compounds (VOC) emissions tests shall be conducted in accordance with th e following procedures: (1) 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 25*, or other procedures approved by the department and U.S. EPA, shall be used for the total nonmethane organic emissions. (2) At least three (3) samples sh all be collected and analyzed. (3) The total test time per repetition shall be a minimum of sixty (60) minutes. (4) Bulk gasoline terminals subject to 326 IAC 20-10 shall be tested in accordance with 40 CFR 63, Subpart R*. All other bulk gasoline t erminals shall be tested in accordance with the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) at 40 CFR 60, Subpart XX*. During all compliance tests, 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 21* shall be used for determining whether there are any leaks from the hatches or flanges of the gasoline transports. If any leak is detected, the transport shall not be used for the capacity of the compliance test of the bulk gasoline terminal. The threshold for leaks shall be as follows: (A) Five hundred (500) parts per million methane for all bulk gasoline termi nals subject to 40 CFR 63, Subpart R*. (B) Ten thousand (10,000) parts per million (as methane) for a ll bulk gasoline terminals subject to 40 CFR 60, Subpart XX* and for all other bulk gasoline terminals.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-6- 5; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2074; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 37)

SECTION 17. 326 IAC 3-6-6 IS ADDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-6-6 Test invalidation Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4-3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17Drm #05-330 Compliance Monitoring December 1, 2010

27 Sec. 6. Based on the department's evaluation, any test series or test run may be considered invalid or unacceptable for any of the following reasons: (1) Failure to do any of the following: (A) Follow the approved protocol and adhere to any procedure or requi rement of the approved method or other protocol conditions a pproved or required by the department. (B) Demonstrate or comply with reference met hods' quality assuranc e and quality control (QA/QC) requirements. (C) Provide or report the required data in order for the department to complete the review of the test conditions, specifications, and results. (2) Use of nonrepresentative pr ocess or operating conditions or control device operation. (3) Observation of fugitive emissions from the emissions unit or associated capture or control system being tested by the department or authorized representative. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-6-6)

SECTION 18. 326 IAC 3-7-1 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-7-1 Applicability Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4-3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 1. This rule applies to fuel sampling and analysis that is performed to determine compliance with the emission limitations specified in 326 IAC 7. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-7-1; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2075; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477)

SECTION 19. 326 IAC 3-7-2 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-7-2 Coal sampling and analysis methods Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4-3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 2. (a) Owners or operators of coal sampling systems for sources w ith total coal-fired capacity greater than or equal to one thousand five hundred (1,500) million British thermal units (Btus) (Btu) per hour actual heat input shall follow procedures specified in ASTM D2234-89*, "Standard Methods for Collection of a Gross Sample of Coal", unless otherwise provided in section 3 of this rule. Additionally, the coal sampling system shall meet the following requirements: (1) The coal sample acquisition point shall be at a location where representative samples of the total coal flow to be combusted by the facility or facilities emissions unit may be obtained. A single as-bunkered sampling station may be used to represent the coal to be combusted by multiple facilities emissions units using the same stockpile feed system. (2) The increment collection method to be used is specified in ASTM D2234-89*, Table 1, I-A-1, I-B-1, or I-C1. (3) The opening of the sampling device shall be at least two and one-half (2.5) times th e top-size of the coal and not less than one and one-fourth (1.25) inches. (4) The sampling device shall have sufficient capacity to co mpletely retain or entirely pass the increment without loss or spillage. (5) The velocity with which the cross-stream cutting instrument travels through the stream shall not exceed eighteen (18) inches per second. The ve locity requirement shall not apply to a swing-arm sampler or to a sampler whose cutter opening is perpendicular to the stream of coal. Owners or operators of all coal sampling systems shall detail the proper operating procedures in the standard operating procedures document required under section 5 of this rule. (6) Increments obtained during the sampling period shall be protected from changes in composition to maintain the integrity of constituent characteristics required to conv ert sample sulfur content to units of the applicableDrm #05-330 Compliance Monitoring December 1, 2010

28 emission standard. (7) A comparison of weight or volume of collected sample w ith that of the total flow of coal shall be conducted at a minimum of one (1) time every two (2) weeks to assure a constant sampling ratio is maintained for increments composited into a sample representing a single twenty-four (24) hour period. (8) A routine inspection of the sampling system shall be established to meet requirements and guidelines specified in ASTM D4702-87*, "Guide for Inspecting Mechanical Coal Sampling Systems that Use Cross-Cut Sample Cutters for Conformance with Current ASTM Methods". (9) Composite samples shall be collected for analysis at a minimum of one (1) time per twenty-four (24) hour period.

(b) Owners or operators of coal sampling systems for sources with total coal-fired capacity between one hundred (100) and one thousand five hundred (1,500) million Btus Btu per hour actual heat input shall comply with requirements: specified as follows: (1) in subsection (a); (2) in section 3 of this rule; or (3) shall meet the following minimum requirements: (A) The coal sample acquisition point shall be at a location where representative samples of the total coal flow to be combusted by the facility or facilities emissions unitmay be obtained. A single asbunkered or as-burned sampling station may be used to represent the coal to be combusted by multiple facilities emissions units using the same stockpile feed system. (B) Coal shall be sampled at least three (3) times per day and at least one (1) time per eight (8) hour period unless no coal is bunkered during the preceding eight (8) hour period. (C) Minimum sample size shall be five hundred (500) grams. (D) Samples shall be composited and analy zed at the end of each calendar month.

(c) Coal samples shall be prepared for analysis in accordance with procedures sp ecified in ASTM D2013-86*, "Standard Method of Preparing Coal Samples for Analysis ". The preparation of samples shall meet the following requirements: (1) Samples shall be prepared in accordance with ASTM D2013-86*, Procedure A or Procedure B. (2) Sample preparation shall be checked at weekly interv als by performing a split sample of the twenty-four (24) hour composite sample and preparing an d analyzing these two (2) identically.

(d) The heat content of coal samples shall be determ ined in accordance w ith procedures specified in ASTM D2015-95*, "Standard Test Method for Gross Calorific Value of Solid Fuel by the Adiabatic Bomb Calorimeter", or ASTM D3286-91A*, "Standard Test Method for Gross Calorific Value of Coal and Coke by the Isothermal Jacket Bomb Calorimeter". Restandardization requirements in Section 11 of both methods shall be followed. Precision requirements for repeatability shall be verified according to Section 16 .1.1 of both methods at a minimum of once per week.

(e) The sulfur content of coal samples shall be dete rmined according to procedures specified in ASTM D3177- 89*, "Standard Test Methods for Total Sulf ur in the Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke", or ASTM D4239-94*, "Standard Test Methods for Sulfur in the Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke Using High Temperature Tube Furnace Combustion Methods". Precision requirements for repeatability shall be ve rified according to ASTM D3177-89*, Section 13, or ASTM D4239-94, Section 18*, at a minimum of one (1) time per week. The laboratory that performs the analysis shall participate in an interlaboratory audit program using coal samples supplied by the department.

(f) Compliance with this section is required unless asource owner or operator demonstrates to The department that may approve minor modifications to the coal sampling and analysis procedures at a source upon demonstration by the source owner or operator that the minor modifications are necessary to meet the re quirements of this section.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Qua lity, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IA C 3-7-2; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00Drm #05-330 Compliance Monitoring December 1, 2010

29 p.m.: 21 IR 2075; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477; errata file d Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 38)

SECTION 20. 326 IAC 3-7-3 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-7-3 Alternative coal sampling and analysis methods Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4-3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 3. (a) As an alternative to the coal sampling and anal ysis procedures in section 2 of this rule, a source owner or operator may use manual or other non-ASTM automatic sampling and analysis procedures upon a demonstration as described in subsection (b), submitted to and approved by the department for approval, and U.S. EPA that such the procedures provide sulfur dioxide emission estimates repres entative either of estimates based on coal sampling and analysis procedures specified in section 2 of this rule or of continuous emissions monitoring. The demonstration shall consist of one (1) or more of the following methods:

(1) (b) For the demonstration described in this section, a source owner or operator may submit documentation of procedures and results of a stopped-belt bias test or other comparisons between a sampling system meeting the requirements of section 2 of this rule and those methods and procedures proposed by the source owner or operator. A stopped-belt bias test and a sampling system meeting the requirements of section 2 of this rule shall be considered reference method systems. A comparison shall utilize a series of at least twenty-five (25) reference method system samples paired with nonreference method system samples and analyzed for the percent of sulfur content to determine the presence of significant systemic error. The detection of signif icant systemic error shall be based on the application of a statistical test (t-test) to determine if there is a difference between the referenc e and nonreference systems at the ninetyfive percent (95%) confidence level, according to the following formula:

Where: t = Calculated t value. d = Average difference between paired data.
Sd = Standard deviation of the differences. N = Number of paired data sets. The calculated t value is compared to the t value in the standard statistical t tables at the ninety-five percent (95%) probability and the appropriate degrees of freedom (n - 1). If the calculated t value is greater than or equal to the value of t in the t table, then the systems are not comparable. Certain coals with low variability may detect a small bias, which may be acceptable as decided on a case-by-case basis. This method tests for positive and negative bias. Provisions for testing only for a negative bias that would cause a source owner or operator to report less than actual values may be acceptable if supported by statistical tests. Upon request, the departme nt shall provide written guidance to a source owner or operator as to the procedures to be followed in conducting this comparison. (2) Other procedures may be acceptable if submitted to the departmentforappr oval and the department approves.

(b) (c) The demonstration provided described in subsection (a) this section shall be repeated upon any significant change to the coal sampling procedures or upon notification by the department that a new demonstration is necessary. If the department has reason to doubt that the alternative sampling and analysis procedures are comparable to methods and procedures provided in section 2 of this rule, based on: (1) inspections; (2) monitoring; (3) quality assurance data; or (4) other information; the department may notify the owner or operator that the demonstration shall be repeated. Written notification by theDrm #05-330 Compliance Monitoring December 1, 2010

30 department of the request shall be made to the source owner or operator allowing at least sixty (60) days to schedule the demonstration. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-7-3; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2077; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477)

SECTION 21. 326 IAC 3-7-4 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-7-4 Fuel oil sampling; analysis methods Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4-3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 4. (a) The source owner or operator shall perform sampling and analysis of the sulfur content of fuel oil shall be performed in accordance with the following ASTM procedures: (1) Collection of fuel oil samples shall be conducted according to either of the following: (A) ASTM D4057-88*, "Standard Practice for Manual Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum Products". (B) ASTM D4177-82*, "Standard Method for Automatic Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum Products". (2) Determination of sulfur content shall be conducted according to any of the following: (A) ASTM D129-95*, "Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Products (General Bomb Method)". (B) ASTM D1266-91*, "Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Products (Lamp Method)". (C) ASTM D1552-95*, "Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Products (High-Temperature Method)". (D) ASTM D2622-94*, "Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Products (X-Ray Spectrographic Method)". (3) Determination of heat content shall be conducted according to ASTM D240-92*, "Standard Test Method for Heat of Combustion of Liquid Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb Calorimeter".

(b) An A source owner or operator may, with the prior written approval of the department and U.S. EPA, modify the procedures specified in subs ection (a), use alternate equivalent procedures, or rely upon equivalent sampling and analysis procedures performed by the vendor prior to delivery of the fuel oil to the owner or operator.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Qua lity, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IA C 3-7-4; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2077; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477; errata file d Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 40)

SECTION 22. 326 IAC 3-7-5 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-7-5 Record keeping requirement s; standard oper ating procedures Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4-3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 5. (a) Owners or oper ators of sources with total coal-fired capacity greater th an or equal to one hundred (100) million British thermal units per hour actual heat input shall develop a standard operating procedure (SOP) to be followed for: (1) sampling; (2) handling; (3) analysis; (4) quality control; (5) quality assurance; and (6) data reporting of the information collected pursuant to under sections 2 through 4 of this rule.Drm #05-330 Compliance Monitoring December 1, 2010

31 In addition, any revision to the SOP shall be submittedto the d epartment. maintained by the sou rce and made available upon request by the department.

(b) Owner or operators of emissions units using CEMS for compliance that do not use coal sampling and analysis as a backup when the CEM is not in use do not need to have a SOP.

(b) (c) The owner or operator of a source or emissions unit subject to this rule shall maintain records sufficient to verify compliance with the procedures specified in sections 2 through 4 of this rule. Records shall be: (1) maintained for a period of five (5) years; and shall be (2) made available upon request by the department. The department may at any time perform a systems audit to determine compliance with the requirements in sections 2 through 4 of this rule. Audit procedures shall be submitted to the owner or operator of a fuel sampling and analysis system subject to audit prior to conducting such the audit. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-7-5; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2078; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477)

SECTION 23. 326 IAC 7-2-1 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 7-2-1 Reporting requirements; methods to determine compliance Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 1. (a) As used in this article, "weighting factor" means the daily quantity of coal bunkered or megawatt generation or other appropriate measure of the output of a combustion source.

(b) As used in this article, "rolling weighted average sulfur dioxide emission rate" means the summation of the average sulfur dioxide emission rate times the daily weighting factor divided by the summation of the weighting factors.

(c) Owners or operators of sources or emissions units subject to 326 IAC 7-1.1, 326 IAC 7-4, or 326 IAC 7-4.1 shall submit to the commissione r the following reports based on fuel sampli ng and analysis data obtained in accordance with procedures specified under 326 IAC 3-7: (1) Fuel combustion sources with total coal-fired heat in put capacity greater than or equal to one thousand five hundred (1,500) million British thermal units (MMBtu) per hour shall submit quarterly reports of the thirty (30) day rolling weighted average sulfur dioxide emission rate in pounds per MMBtu. Records of the daily average coal sulfur content, coal heat content, weighting factor, and daily average sulfur dioxide emission rate in pounds per MMBtu shall be submitted to the department in the qua rterly report and maintained by the source owner or operator for a period of at least two (2) years. (2) Fuel combustion sources with total coal-fired heat in put capacity greater than one hundred (100) and less than one thousand five hundred (1,500) MMBtu per hour shall submit quarterly reports of the calendar month average coal sulfur content, coal heat content, and sulfur dioxide emission rate in pounds per MMBtu and the total monthly coal consumption. (3) All other fuel combustion sources shall submit reports of calendar month average sulfur content, heat content, fuel consumption, and sulfur dioxide emission rate in pounds per MMBtu upon request. (d) Compliance or noncompliance with the emission limitations contained in 326 IAC 7

- 1.1, 326 IAC 7

- 4, or326 IAC 7

- 4.1 may be determined by astack test conducted in accordance with 326 IAC 3

- 6 utilizi ng procedures outlined in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6*, 6A*, 6C*, or 8*.

(e) (d) Fuel sampling and analysis data shall be collected pursuant to the procedures specified in 326 IAC 3-7-2 or 326 IAC 3-7-3 for coal combustion or 326 IAC 3-7-4 for oil combustion. and these datamay be used to determine compliance or noncompliance with the emission limitations contained in 326 IAC 7

- 1.1, 326 IAC 7

- 4, or326 IAC 7

- 4.1. Computation of calculated sulfur dioxide emission rates from fuel sampling and analysis data shall be based on the emission factors contained in U.S. EPA publication AP-42* unless other emission factors based on site-specific sulfur dioxide measurements are approv ed by the commissioner and the U.S. EPA. Fuel sampling and analysis data shall beDrm #05-330 Compliance Monitoring December 1, 2010

32 collected as follows: (1) For coal-fired fuel combustion sources with heat input capacity greater than or equal to one thousand five hundred (1,500) MMBtu per hour, compliance or noncompliance shall be determined using a thirty (30) day rolling weighted average sulfur dioxide emission rate in pounds per MMBtu unless a shorter averaging time or alternate averaging methodology is specified for a source under this article. (2) For all other combustion sources, compliance or noncompliance shall be determined using a calendar month average sulfur dioxide emission rate in pounds per MMBtu unless a shorter averaging time or alternate averaging methodology is specified for a source under this article.

(f) A determination of noncompliance under either the method s pecified in subsection (d) or(e) shall not be refuted by evidence of compliance underthe other method.

(g) (e) Upon written notification of an emissions unit owner or operator to the department, Subsection (c) does not apply when continuous emission monitoring data collected and reported under 326 IAC 3-5 may be is used as the means for determining compliance with the emission limitations in this article. Upon such notification, the other requirements of this rule shall not apply.

(f) Compliance or noncompliance with the emission limitations contained in 326 IAC 7-1.1 or 326 IAC 7-4 may be determined by an appropriate method as follows: (1) A stack test conducted in accordance with 326 IAC 3-6 using procedures in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6*, 6A*, 6C*, or 8*. (2) A continuous emission monitoring sy stem in accordance with 326 IAC 3-5. (3) Source sampling in accordance with 326 IAC 3-6. (4) Fuel sampling and analysis data collected in accordance with subsection (d) or 326 IAC 3-7. (5) Other methods approved by the commissioner and U.S. EPA.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 7-2- 1; filed Aug 28, 1990, 4:50 p.m.: 14 IR 52; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2078; errata filed Fe b 9, 1999, 4:06 p.m.: 22 IR 2006; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477; errata filed Nov 7, 2001, 3:00 p. m.: 25 IR 813; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:30 p.m.: 26 IR 1565; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 42; filed May 25, 2005, 10:50 a.m.: 28 IR 2953)

# A PPENDIX 

# F1 

### BEFORE THE STATE OF INDIANA

2 

### AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

3

4

5 

### PUBLIC MEETING OF MAY 4, 2011
6



### 7

8 

# ORIGINAL

9 

### PROCEEDINGS

10 before the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board,

11 Dr. James Miner, Chairman, taken before me,

12 Lindy L. Meyer, Jr., a Notary Public in and for

13 the State of Indiana, County of Shelby, at the

14 Indiana Government Center South, Conference

15 Center, Room C, 402 West Washington Street,

16 Indianapolis, Indiana, on Wednesday, May 4, 2011

17 at 1:02 o'clock p.m.

18

19

20

21

22



### 23 William F. Daniels, RPR/CP CM d/b/a ACCURATE REPORTING OF INDIANA 12922 Brighton Avenue Carmel, Indiana 46032 (317) 848-0088 1

### 1 APPEARANCES:

2 BOARD MEMBERS:

3 

### James Miner, M.D. Chairman Thomas Anderson 4 David Benshoof Dr. Phil Stevens 5 Jeffery L. Quyle Gregory Kissel 6 Chris Horn Ronald D. Clark, Proxy, State Board of 7 Health

8

9



### 10



### 11

12

13



### 14

15

16



### 17

18

19



### 20

21

22

23 

### John Bacone, Proxy, Department of Natural Resources Pamela Fisher, Proxy, Indiana Economic Development Corporation

IDEM STAFF MEMBERS:

Thomas W. Easterly, IDEM Commissioner Keith Baugues, Asst. Commissioner Scott Deloney Chris Pedersen Amy Smith Susan Bern Matt Stuckey Phil Perry Ann Long Catherine Mitchell

PUBLIC SPEAKERS:

Bernie Paul Chad Bladow 2

### 1 yes.

2

3

4



### 5

6

7



### 8 yes.

9 35



### Mr. Horn?

MR. HORN: Yes.

CHAIRMAN MINER: Mr. Horn votes yes.

Dr. Stevens?

DR. STEVENS: Yes.

CHAIRMAN MINER: Dr. Stevens votes

And l"'r. Quyl e?

MR. QUYLE: Yes. 10



### 11 CHAIRMAN MINER: Mr. Quyle votes yes,

12 and I vote yes as well. This passes unanimously.

13 The next item on our agenda is a public

14 hearing before the Air Pollution Control Board of

15 the State of Indiana regarding final adoption of

16 amendments, 326 lAC 3, Compliance Monitoring.

17 

### I will now introduce Exhibit No. 5

18 thank you, Chris

-- the proposed rules as

19 preliminarily adopted with IDEM's suggested

20 changes incorporated, into the record of this

21 hearing.

22 Is there someone from the Department who

23 wishes to speak in regards to this rule?1 

### MR. DELONEY: Susan Bern, with the

2 Office of Air Quality.

3

4 

### CHAIRMAN MINER:

MS. BEM: Hello. Susan?

My name is Susan

5 Bern, and I work in the Rules and SIP Section.

6 

### This rulemaking amends IDEM's Compliance

7 Monitoring Rules in Article 3 and one section of

8 

### the Sulfur Dioxide Rules in Article 7-2-1. The

9 

### amendments address changes needed for federal

10 approval of the rule into the Indiana SIP, where

11 U.S. EPA approval is needed in instances of

12 Commissioner's discretion while also making some

13 corrections and providing clarifications.

IDEM is proposing a few changes to the 36

14

15 proposed rule for final adoption today. Based on

16 comments received during the third comment

17 period, IDEM is proposing to revise the language

18 at 326 IAC 3-5-5(f) to allow RATA tests to be

19 submitted 45 days after completion of the test.

20 IDEM is also proposing to revise

21 monitoring requirements that affect peaking units

22 because peaking units are not always operating,

23 and the amendments will allow for peaking units

### 1 to comply with the testing schedule for CEMS in

2 Part 75 instead of Part 60, Appendix F.

3 IDEM simplified the language in

4 326 IAC 3-5-S(e) to rely solely on the testing

5 

### schedule in Part 75 that allows for an extended

6 

### time frame for RATA testing. The peaking unit

7 definition was also simplified to define peaking

8 

### unit by capacity factor.

9 

### IDEM received comments during the third 37

10 comment period requesting that repairs be added

ll 

### to the list of periods when a CEMS or COMS is not

12 required to be in operation. IDEM has made this

13 requested change for final adoption, but notes

14 that downtime due to repairs is still counted

15 against a source in terms of data validity

16 requirements.

17 IDEM also proposed to add a new section

18 for test invalidation provisions at

19 

### 326 IAC 3-6-6. During the third comment period

20 IDEM received comment asking about the need for

21 test invalidation provisions when IDEM already

22 has the authority to invalidate tests. Even

23 though it could be useful to provide an example

### 1 in the rule, IDEM is proposing to delete this

2 section for final adoption.

3 IDEM is also proposing to correct the

4 oversight in the proposed rule language for

5 emission test.ing at 326 IAC 3-6-3 (b) (2) to allow

6 for test runs of 48 hours. 38



### 7 The last change I would like to talk about

8 today is that we are also clarifying for final

9 

### adoption that the visible emissions readings are

10 not required when conducting a PM test if a PM

ll 

### CEMS is used. Other applicable rules may require

12 VE readings.

l3 

### All of these changes are noted in the fact

14 sheet that's this part of the Board packet, and

15 there are a few other very minor changes listed

16 on the beginning of the fact sheet in the box.

17 The bepartment requests that the Board

18 final adopt the proposed rule with IDEM's

19 suggested changes as presented.

CHAIRMAN MINER: Thank you, Susan. 20



### 21

22 MS. BEM: Thank you. Any questions?

CHAIRMAN MINER: Any questions for

23 Susan at this time?

### 1

2

3

4 

### (No response.)

CHAIRMAN MINER: Thank you, Susan.

MS. BEM: Thank you.

CHAIRMAN MINER: Once again, I have 39



### 5 no specific cards from anyone wishing to speak in

6 

### regard to this rule. Is there anyone present who

7 wishes to make a comment at this time?

8

9



### 10 

### (No response.)

CHAIRMAN MINER: Seeing none, this

hearing is now concluded. We are now ready for

11 Board action on final adoption of amendments to

12 

### 326 IAC 3, Compliance Monitoring. Does the Board

13 have any questions regarding the amendments to

14 the preliminarily adopted rule?

15 (No response.)

16 

### CHAIRMAN MINER: Seeing none, I would

17 entertain a motion for approval of the amendments

18 to be adopted into the preliminarily adopted

19 rule.

20

21



### 22 Dr. Stevens.

23 DR. STEVENS: So moved.

CHAIRMAN MINER: I have a motion from

MR. ANDERSON: I'll second.40



### CHAIRMAN MINER: And a second from 1



### 2 Mr. Anderson. All those in favor of applying the

3 newly amended rules to the rule, signify. by

4 saying aye.

5 MR. HORN: Aye.

6 MR. BACONE: Aye.

7 MR. ANDERSON: Aye.

8

9



### 10

11



### 12

13

l4



### 15



### 16

17 

### MR. BENSHOOF: Aye.

MS. FISHER: Aye.

MR. CLARK: Aye.

MR. QUYLE: Aye.

MR. KISSEL: Aye.

DR. STEVENS: Aye.

CHAIRMAN MINER: Aye.

Opposed?

(No response.)

CHAIRMAN MINER: It passes. Now I

18 would entertain a motion for adoption of the

19 amended rule.

20

21 

### MR. BENSHOOF: So moved.

CHAIRMAN MINER: I have a motion from

22 Mr. Benshoof.

23 

### MR. HORN: Second. I

### 41



### CHAIRMAN MINER: And a second from 1



### 2

3

4



### 5 

### Mr. Horn. I'll do a roll-call vote.

6 yes.

7

8

9



### 10



### 11



### 12

13 yes.

14

15

16



### 17 yes.

18

19



### 20



### 21 yes.

22

23 

### Mr. Benshoof?

MR. BENSHOOF: Aye.

CHAIRMAN MINER: Mr. Benshoof votes

Mr. Clark?

MR. CLARK: Yes.

CHAIRMAN MINER: Mr. Clark votes yes.

Ms. Fisher?

MS. FISHER: Yes.

CHAIRMAN MINER: Ms. Fisher votes

Mr. Bacone?

MR. BACONE: Aye.

CHAIRMAN MINER: Mr. Bacone votes

Mr. Kissel?

MR. KISSEL: Yes.

CHAIRMAN MINER: Mr. Kissel votes

Mr. Anderson?

MR. ANDERSON: Aye.1



### 2 yes.

3

4

5

6

7

8



### 9 yes. 42

CHAIRMAN MINER: Mr. Anderson votes

Mr. Horn?

MR. HORN: Yes.

CHAIRMAN MINER: Mr. Horn votes yes.

Dr. Stevens?

DR. STEVENS: Yes.

CHAIRMAN MINER: Dr. Stevens votes

Mr. Quyle?

MR. QUYLE: Yes. 10

11



### 12

13 

### CHAIRMAN MINER: Mr. Quyle votes yes,

and I vote yes as well. The Board votes

14 unanimously for approval of this rule.

15 The next item on our agenda is a public

16 hearing before the Air Pollution Control Board of

17 the State of Indiana regarding preliminarily

18 adoption of amendments, 326 IAC 2, Permit Fees.

19 

### We will now introduce Exhibit 6 thank

20 you, Chris

-- the draft rule, into the record of

21 the hearing.

22 Is there someone who wishes to speak to

23 this rule?

### 104

1 

### CERTIFICATE

2 

### I, Lindy L.**Me~er,** 

### Jr., the undersigned

3 Court Reporter and Notary Public residing in the

4 City of Shelbyville, Shelby County, Indiana, do

5 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and

6 correct transcript of the proceedings taken by me

7 on Wednesday, May 4, 2011 in this matter and

8 

### transcribed by me.

9



### 10

11 

### Lindy 

# 'tJ. Meyer, Jr.

,
12 Notary Public in and

13 

### for the State of Indiana.

14

15 My Commission expires October 27, 2016.

16

17

18



### 19



### 20

21

22

23Prc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

1 Strikeout = existing language that is being deleted Bold = new language S trikeout and single underline = existing language that is being deleted since preliminary adoption Bold and single underline = new language since preliminary adoption Bold, strikeout and single underline = new language at preliminary adoption that is being deleted (the board will not be requested to final adopt this language)



### TITLE 326 AIR POLLUT ION CONTROL BOARD

PROPOSED RULE AS PRELIMINARILY ADOPTED WITH IDEM'S SUGGESTED CHANGES INCORPORATED

LSA Document #05-330

DIGEST

Amends 326 IAC 3-4-1, 326 IAC 3-4-2, 326 IAC 3-4-3, 326 IAC 3-5-1, 326 IAC 3- 5-2, 326 IAC 3-5-3, 326 IAC 3-5-4, 326 IAC 3- 5-5, 326 IAC 3-5-6, 326 IAC 3-5-7, 326 IAC 3

- 5

- 8, 326 IAC 3-6-1, 326 IAC 3-6-2, 326 IAC 3-6-3, 326 IAC 3-6-4, 326 IAC 3-6-5, 326 IAC 3

- 6

- 6 , 326 IAC 3-7-1, 326 IAC 3-7-2, 326 IAC 3-7-3, 326 IAC 3-7-4, and 326 IAC 3-7- 5 and adds 326 IAC 3-5-8 concerning compliance monitoring. Amends 326 IAC 7-2-1 concerning sulfur dioxide compliance requirement s. Effective 30 days after filing with the Publisher.

HISTORY First Notice of Comment Pe riod: December 1, 2005, Indi ana Register (29 IR 899). Second Notice of Comment Period: March 31, 2010, Indiana Register (DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA). Notice of First Hearing: March 31 , 2010, Indiana Register (DIN: 20100331-IR326050330PHA). Continuation of Second Notice of Comm ent Period: May 12, 2010, Indiana Register (DIN: 20100512-IR-326050330SCA). Change in Notice of First Hearing: August 4, 2010, Indiana Register (DIN: 20100804-IR-326050330CHA). Change in Notice of First Hearing: October 20, 2010, Indiana Register (DIN: 20101020-IR-326050330CHA). Change in Notice of First Hearing: March 9, 2011, Indiana Register (DIN: 20110309- IR-326050330CHA). Date of First Hearing: December 1, 2010.

326 IAC 3-4-1; 326 IAC 3-4-2; 326 IAC 3-4- 3; 326 IAC 3-5-1; 326 IAC 3-5-2; 326 IAC 3-5-3; 326 IAC 3-5-4; 326 IAC 3-5-5; 326 IAC 3-5-6; 326 IAC 3-5-7; 326 IAC 3-5-8; 326 IAC 3-6-1; 326 IAC 3-6-2; 326 IAC 3-6-3; 326 IAC 3-6- 4; 326 IAC 3-6-5; 326 IAC 3

- 6

- 6; 326 IAC 3-7-1; 326 IAC 3-7-2; 326 IAC 3-7- 3; 326 IAC 3-7-4; 326 IAC 3-7-5; 326 IAC 7-2-1

SECTION 1. 326 IAC 3-4-1 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:Prc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

2 

### 326 IAC 3-4-1 Definitions Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-11; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 1. In addition to the definitions provided in IC 13-11, 326 IAC 1-2, and 326 IAC 2-7, the following definitions apply throughout this article unless expressly stated otherwise: (1) "Applicable emission limitation or standard" means any of the following: (A) A state orfederal emission limitation orstandard applicable to a regulated hazardous air pollutantunder 40 CFR 61* or40 CFR 63*. (B) A state orfederal emission limitation orstandard applicable to a regulated air pollutant, other than a hazardous air pollutant under Section 112 of the CAA, forwhich the source is classified as a major source. (2) (1) "Calendar quarter" means a consecutive three (3) month period (nonoverlapping) beginning on: (A) January 1; (B) April 1; (C) July 1; or (D) October 1. (3) "Certified emissions monitor" means an emissions monitor that meets all applicable performance specifications of 40 CFR 60* orany other perform ance specification, and forwhich performance datahas been submitted to and approved by the department. (2) "Capture system" means the equipment, including hoods, ducts, fans, and booths, that is used to contain, captu re, and transport a pollutant to a control device. (3) "Continuous emission monitoring sy stem" or "CEMS" means the equipment required by the applicable permit, state rule, or federal regulation used to sample, analyze, measure, and provide a continuous, permanent record of emissions in units of the applic able standard or other form. (4) "Continuous opacity monitoring sy stem" or "COMS" means the equipment required by the applicable permit, state rule, or federal regulation used to measure the opacity of the effluent on a continuous basis as either of the following: (A) The optical density of the effluent gas. (B) The opacity of the effluent gas. (5) "Data" means the results of any type of monitoring or me thod, including the results of: (A) instrumental or noni nstrumental monitoring; (B) emission calculations; (C) manual sampling procedures; (D) record keeping procedures; or (E) any other form of information collection procedure used in connection with any type of monitoring or method. (6) "Emission limitation or standard" means the following: (A) Any applicable requirement under the CAA contained in this title that constitutes:Prc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

3 

### (i) an emission limitation or standard; (ii) a standard of performance; or (iii) a means of emission limitation. (B) An emission limitation or standard may be expressed: (i) in terms of the pollutant, either as: (AA) a specific quantity, rate, or concentration of emissions; or (BB) the relationship of uncontrolled to controlled emissions; or (ii) as either: (AA) a work practice; (BB) a process or control devices parameter; or (CC) another form of specific: (aa) design; (bb) equipment; (cc) operational; or (dd) operation and maintenance; requirement. (C) For purposes of 326 IAC 3-8, an em ission limitation or standard shall not include general operation requirem ents that an owner or operator may be required to meet. (4) (7) "Emission test", "source sampling test", "compliance test", or "performance test" means a procedure for sampling a gas stream from a single sampling location at

a facility, an emissions unit, or pollution control equipment, to determine a pollutant emission rate, concentration, or parameter while the facility, emissions unit, or pollution control equipment is operating at co nditions that result in measurement of the highest emission or parameter values (pri or to any control device), or at other operating conditions approved by the departmentor U.S. EPA. A test shall comprise three (3) sampling runs for a specified sa mpling time span. Additional conditions may be required by applicable rules, permit, or enforce mentorder. The test owner or operator shall be performed perform the testusing sampling and analytical procedures approved by the department or U.S. EPA for the specific pollutant or parameter and facility, emissions unit, pollution control equipment, process, or operation. (5) (8) "Emissions unit" means any part of oractivity ata source that emits or has the potential to emitany regulated air pollutantforwhich an emission limitation or standard has been established. This term does notalter oraffec tthe definition of the

term "unit" forpurposes of Title IV of the CAA orof the term "emissions unit" for
purposes of Title V of the CAA. has the meaning set forth in 326 IAC 1-2-23.5. (9) "Exceedance" means a condition that: (A) is detected by monitoring that provides data in terms of an emission limitation or standard; and (B) indicates that emissions (or opacit y) are greater than the applicable emission limitation or standard (or less than the applicable standard in the case of a percent reduction requirement) consistent with any averaging period specified for averagi ng the results of the monitoring.Prc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

4 

### (10) "Malfunction" means any sudden, infrequent, and not reasonably preventable failure of air pollution cont rol equipment, process equipment, or a process to operate in a normal or usual manner. Failures that are caused in part by poor maintenance or careless operation are not malfunctions. For purposes of this article, a CEMS or COMS is considered process equipment. (6) "Major source" means any major sourc e as defined in 326 IAC 2

- 7

- 1(22), excluding any source described in 326 IAC 2

- 7

- 1(22)(A). (7) (11) "Monitoring" means any form of colle cting data on a routine basis to determine or otherwise assess compliance with emission limitations or standards. The term includes the following: (A) Record keeping, if records are used to determine or assess compliance with an emission limitati on or standard, including: (i) records of raw material content and usage; (ii) records that document co mpliance with work practice requirements; or (iii) other records used to determ ine or assess compliance with an emission limitation or standard. (B) Compliance method tests that a re conducted on a routine periodic basis. (C) One (1) or more of the following data collection techniques, where appropriate, for a particular circumstance: (i) Continuous emission or opacity monitoring systems. (ii) Continuous process, capture system, control device, or other relevant parameter monitoring systems or procedures, including a PEMS. (iii) Emission estimation and calculation procedures. (iv) Maintenance and analysis of records of fuel or raw materials
usage. (v) Recording results of a program or protocol to conduct specific operation and maintenance procedures. (vi) Verification of emissions, process parameters, capture system parameters, or control device parame ters, using portable or in situ measurement devices. (vii) Visible emission observations. (viii) Any other form of measur ing, recording, or verifying on a routine basis emissions, process parameters, capture system parameters, control device paramet ers, or other factors relevant to assessing compliance with an emission limitation or standard. (8) "Monitor system malfunction" means any interruption in the collection of valid dataas a result of the failure of any componentof the system to operate within the specifications of the applicable performance specification. (9) (12) "Out of control" means any data co llected by a continuous monitoring system during periods immediately following an out of tolerance quality assurance assessment and prior to an acceptabl e quality assurance assessment.Prc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

5 

### (10) "Permit" means any applicable permit issued, renewed, amended, revised, or modified under 326 IAC 2

- 1, 326 IAC 2

- 2, 326 IAC 2

- 3, 326 IAC 2

- 7, 326 IAC 2

- 8,

or326 IAC 2

- 9. (13) "Peaking unit" means the following: (A) An an emissions unit that has: (i) an average capacity factor of not more than ten and zero-tenths percent (10.0%) during the previous three (3) calendar years; and (ii) a capacity factor of not more than twenty and zero-tenths percent (20.0%) in each of those calendar years. (B) For purposes of 40 CFR 75*, an emis sions unit may initially qualify as a peaking unit if the designated rep resentative demonstrates to the satisfaction of the commis sioner that the requirements of clause (A) are met, or will in the future be met, through one (1) of the following submissions: (i) For a unit for which a monitoring plan has not been submitted under 40 CFR 75.62*, the designat ed representative submits eit her: (AA) capacity factor data for the emissions unit for the three (3) calendar years immediately preceding the date of initial submission of the monitoring plan for the emissions unit under 40 CFR 75.62*; or (BB) if an emissions un it does not have capaci ty factor data for one (1) or more of the three (3) calendar years immediately preceding the date of initial submission of the monitoring plan for th e unit under 40 CFR 75.62*, all available capacity factor data, beginning with the date on which the emissi ons unit commenced commercial operation, and projected capacity factor data. (ii) For a unit for which a monitoring plan has already been submitted under 40 CFR 75.62*, that has not qualified as a peaking unit under item (i), and where capacity factor chan ges, the designated representative submits either: (AA) three (3) calendar years of data following the change in the emissions unit's capacity factor showing an average capacity factor of not more than ten and zero

- tenths percent (10.0%) during the three ( 3) previous calendar years and a capacity factor of not more than twenty and

zero - tenths percent (20.0%) in each of those calendar
years; or (BB) one (1) calendar year of data following the change in the emissions unit's capacity factor showing a capacity factor of not more than ten and zero

- tenths percent (10.0%) and a statement that this changed pattern of operation resulting in a capaci ty factor less than ten and

zero - tenths percent (10.0%) is considered permanent and is projected to continue for the for eseeable future.Prc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

6 

### (C) For purposes of 40 CFR 75*, an emis sions unit that initially qualifies as a peaking unit must meet the criteria in clause (A) ea ch year in order to continue to qualify as a peaking unit. If such an emissions unit fails to meet such cri teria for a given year, the emis sions unit no longer qualifies as a peaking unit starting January 1 of the year after the year for which the criteria are not met. If an emissi ons unit failing to meet the criteria in clause (A) initially qualified as a peak ing unit under clause (B), the emissions unit may qualify as a peakin g unit for a subsequent year only if the designated representative submit s the data specified in clause (B)(ii)(AA). (D) An emissions unit re quired to comply with the provisions of Subpar t H of 40 CFR 75*, under a state or federal NO X 

### mass emissions reduction program, may, pursuant to 40 CFR 75.74( c)(11)*, qualify as a peaking unit on an ozone season basis rather than an annual basis, if the owner or operator reports NO X 

### mass emissions and heat input data only during the

ozone season. (14) "Predictive emission monitoring sy stem" or "PEMS" means a system that uses process and other parameters as inputs to a computer program or other data reduction system to produce values in terms of the applicable emission limitation or standard. (15) "QA operating quarter" means a calendar quarter in which there are at least one hundred sixty-eight (168) unit operating hours, as defined in subdivision (25) subdivision (18) , or, for a common stack or bypass stack, a calendar quarter in which there are at le ast one hundred sixty-eight (168) stack operating hours, as defined in subdivision (2 4 ) subdivision (17)

. (11) (16) "Quality assurance" means those activities performed to ensure that monitoring dataare su fficiently representative, accurate, precise, reliable, frequent, and timely. Those activities include, butare notlimited to, frequent activities (daily) and less frequentactivities (weekly, monthly, quarterly, and yearly). establish validity of data used to demonstrate compliance. (17) "Stack operating hour" means a cl ock hour during which flue gases flow through a particular stack or duct, either for the entire hour or for part of the hour, while any associated emissi ons units are combusting fuel. (18) "Unit operating hour" means a cloc k hour during which an emissions unit combusts any fuel, either for part of the hour or for the entire hour.

*These documents are incorporated by refe rence. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 73 2 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indian a Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Fl oor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Ind iana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-4-1; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2062; readopted filed J an 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1566; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 30)

SECTION 2. 326 IAC 3-4-2 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:Prc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

7 

### 326 IAC 3-4-2 Certification Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4- 3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 2. Each report submitted under this article shall contain a certification of truth, accuracy, and completeness. This certification and a ny other certification required under this article shall state that , based on information and belief fo rmed after reasona ble inquiry, the statements and information in the docum ent are true, accurate, and complete. Reports submitted under 326 IAC 3-8 shall meet the certification requirements of 326 IAC 2-7- 4(f). (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 4-2; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2063; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477)

SECTION 3. 326 IAC 3-4-3 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-4-3 Conversion factors Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 3. (a) Owners or operators of facilities emissions units subject to this article shall use the following procedures for convertin g monitoring data to un its of the standard where necessary: (1) For The owner or operator of a fossil fuel-fired steam generators, generator shall use the following procedures shall be used to convert gaseous emission monitoring data in parts per million (ppm) to pounds per million British thermal units (Btu) (lbs/MMBtu) where necessary: (A) When the owner or operator of a fo ssil fuel-fired steam generator elects under this article to measure oxygen (O 2 

### ) in flue gases, the measurements of owner or operator shall measure the pollutant concentration and oxygen shall be on a dry basis and use the following conversion procedure: used:

(B) When the owner or operator elects under this article to measure carbon dioxide (CO 2 

### ) in flue gases, the measurement of owner or operator shall

measure the pollutant concentration and the CO 2 

### concentration shall each be on a consistent basis (wet or dry) and use the following conversion procedure: used:

(C) When the owner or operator elects under this article to measure sulfur dioxide (SO 2 

### ) or nitrogen oxides (NO x 

### ) in the flue gases, the measurement of owner or operator shall measure the diluent concentration and the SO 2 

### and

or the NO x 

### concentration shall each be on a wet basis and use the following conversion procedure, used, except where wet scr ubbers are employed or where moisture is otherwise added to the stack gases:Prc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

8 

### (D) When the owner or operator elect s under this article to measure SO 2 

### or NO x 

### in the flue gases, the measurement of owner or operator shall measure the diluent concentration and the SO 2 

### and or the NO x 

### concentration shall each be on a wet basis and use the following conversion procedure, shall be used where wet scrubbers or moisture is ot herwise present in the stack gases, provided water vapor content of the stack gas is measured at least once every fifteen (15) minutes at the same point as the pollu tant and oxygen measurements are made:

(E) The values used in the equations under this subdivision are derived as follows: C ws 

### = Pollutant concentration at stack cond itions in grams per wet standard cubic meter (g/wscm) or pounds per wet standard cubic meter (lbs/wscm), determined by multiplying the average concentration in parts per million (ppm) for each one (1) hour period by 4.15 × 10 -5 

### M g/wscm per ppm or 2.59 × 10 -9 

### M lbs/wscm per ppm, where M is pollutant molecular weight in grams per grammole (g/g-mole) or pounds per pound-mole (lb/lb-mole).
M = 64.07 for SO 2 

### and 46.01 for oxides of nitrogen (NO x 

### ) as NO 2


### . C = Pollutant concentration at stack cond itions in pounds per dry standard cubic meter (lbs/dscm) or grams per dr y standard cubic meter (g/dscm). F, F c 

### = A factor representing a ratio of the volume of dry flue gases generated to the calorific value of the fuel combusted (F), and a factor repres enting a ratio of the volume of carbon dioxide generated to the calorific value of the fuel combusted (F c 

### ), respectively. Values of F and F c 

### are given in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 19*, as applicable.
F w 

### = A factor representing a ratio of the vo lume of wet flue gases generated to the calorific value of the fuel combusted. Values of F w 

### are given in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 19*.
B wa 

### = Proportion by volume of wate r vapor in the ambient air.
B ws 

### = Proportion by volume of wa ter vapor in the stack gas.

E = Pollutant emission, lbs/MMBtu.
Percent O 2 

### , percent CO 2 

### = Oxygen or carbon dioxide volume (expre ssed as percent) determined with equipment specified under this article.
Percent O 2ws 

### = Oxygen volume (expressed as percent) measurements made at stack conditions on a wet basis. (2) For sulfuric acid plants, or production facilities, the owner or operator shall: (A) establish a conversion factor th ree (3) times daily according to the procedures of 40 CFR 60.84(b)*;Prc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

9 

### (B) multiply the conversion factor by the average sulfur dioxide (SO 2 

### ) concentration in the flue gases to obtain average SO 2 

### emissions in pounds per ton (lbs/ton); and (C) report the average sulfur dioxide emissions for each three (3) hour period in excess of the emission standard se t forth in 326 IAC 7 in the quarterly
summary. report.

(b) The department may approve alternate procedures for computing emission averages that do not require integration of data or alternative methods of converting pollutant concentration measurements to units of the emission standard may be approved by the departmentif the owner or operator shows that the alternate procedures are at least as accurate as those in this rule.

*These documents are incorporated by refe rence. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capito l Street NW, Washingt on, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indian a Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Fl oor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-4-3; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2063; readopted filed J an 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1566; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 31)

SECTION 4. 326 IAC 3-5-1 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-5-1 Applicability; continuous monitoring requirements for applicable pollutants Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4- 3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 1. (a) This rule establishes the following: (1) Substantive requirements for monitoring certain types of sources. (2) A process fordeveloping suitable monitoring requirements forother types of

sour ces.

(b) (a) This rule applies to the following sources and facilities hereinafter referred to

as affected facilities: or emissions units to determine compliance with an emission limitation or standard: (1) Any facility emissions unitrequired to perform con tinuous monitoring under 326 IAC 12. which incorporates by reference the requirements of 40 CFR 60*, orby a standard for hazardous air pollutants under326 IAC 14, which incorporates by reference the requirements of 40 CFR 61*, or 326 IAC 20, which in corporates by reference the requirements of 40 CFR 63*. (2) Fossil fuel-fired steam generato rs of greater than one hundred million (100,000,000) British thermal units (Btus) (Btu) per hour heat input capacity. (3) Sulfuric acid plants or production facilit ies of greater than three hundred (300) tons per day acid production capacity.Prc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

10 

### (4) Petroleum refinery catalyst regenerators for fluid bed cataly tic cracking units of greater than twenty th ousand (20,000) barrels or eight hundred forty thousand (840,000) gallons per day fresh feed capacity. (5) Portland cement plants. (6) Facilities Sources or emissions units that combust sewage sludge. (7) Sources or emissions units making coke from raw materials, including the following: (A) Coal refining byproducts. (B) Petroleum refining byproducts. (8) Facilities Emissions units in Clark and Floyd Counties that: (A) have potential to emit nitrogen oxides (NO x 

### ) of greater than or equal to forty (40) tons per year; and (B) are located at sources that have potential to emit NO x 

### of greater than or equal to one hundred (100) tons per year as described in 326 IAC 10. (9) Any emissions unit required to monitor under subsection (c).

(c) (b) Owners and operators of sources and facilities or emissions units described in subsection (b) (a) are subject to the following requirements: (1) Any facility emissions unitsubject to 326 IAC 12 which incorporates by reference the requirements of 40 CFR 60*, 326 IAC 14, which incorporates by reference the requirements of 40 CFR 61*, or 326 IA C 20, which incorporates by reference the requirements of 40 CFR 61*, shall comply with the following: (A) The monitoring and reporting requireme nts as specified for the applicable rule. (B) All requirements of this rule. (2) The owner or operator of a fossil fuel-fired steam generators generator of greater than one hundred million (100,000,000) Bt u per hour heat input capacity shall continuously monitor the following: (A) Opacity, unless one (1) of the following occurs: (i) Gaseous fuel is the only fuel combusted. (ii) Oil or a mix of gas and oil are the only fuels combusted and the facility emissions unitis able to comply with both of the following rules without using particulate matter collection equipment: (AA) 326 IAC 5-1. (BB) 326 IAC 6-2. (iii) An alternative monitoring requ irement request has been granted by the department and approved by U.S. EPA. The owner or operator may requestan alternative monitoring requirement may be requested when installation of an opac ity monitoring system would not provide accurate determinations of em issions as a result of interference from condensed uncombined water vapor. Any alternative monitoring requirement request sha ll address the following: (AA) Information pertaining to the inability of the affected facility emissions unit to find an acceptable monitoring location prior to the source of the condensed, uncombined water vapor.Prc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

11 

### (BB) A list of proposed alterna tive monitoring requirements. For each proposed alternative monitoring requirement, the request must provide a detailed description of thresholds or triggers for corrective action re sulting from deviation from normal operating parameters and how deviations from key surrogate parameters shall be addressed to insure ensure continuous compliance with all applicable particulate and opacity requirements. An example of an acceptable alternative monitoring requirement is a particulate compliance demonstration that is no less frequentthan annual performed at least annually, in accordance with 326 IAC 3-6 and a compliance monitoring plan that, at a minimum, satisfies monitoring requirements under 326 IAC 2-7 or 326 IAC 2-8. (CC) Record keeping that is cons istent with section 6 of this rule. (DD) Reporting frequency that is no less frequent than that required in section 7 of this rule. (iv) An alternative monitoring re quirement request granted by the department under item (iii) shall be submitted to U.S. EPA as a state implementation plan (SIP) revision and shall not be in effect until approved as a SIP revision. (B) Sulfur dioxide (SO 2 

### ) under the following conditions: (i) SO 2 

### pollution control equipmen t has been installed. (ii) A monitor is required to de termine compliance with either: of the following: (AA) 326 IAC 12; or (BB) a new construction permit or operating permit required under 326 IAC 2. (C) Nitrogen oxide (NO x 

### ) under the following conditions: (i) NO x 

### pollution control equipment has been installed. (ii) A monitor is required to de termine compliance with either: of the following: (AA) 326 IAC 12; or (BB) a new construction permit or operating permit required under 326 IAC 2. (D) The percent oxygen (O 2 

### ) or carbon dioxide (CO 2 

### ) if measurements of O 2 

### or CO 2 

### in the flue gas are required to convert either SO 2 

### or NO x 

### continuous monitoring data, or both, to units of the emission limitation for the particular facility. emissions unit. (3) Sulfuric acid plants or production facilities of greater than three hundred (300) tons per day acid producti on capacity shall monitor SO 2 

### for each sulfuric acid producing facility emissions unitwithin the source. (4) Petroleum refinery catalyst regenerators for fluid bed cataly tic cracking units of greater than twenty th ousand (20,000) barrels or eight hundred forty thousand (840,000) gallons per day fresh feed cap acity shall monitor opacity for each regenerator within the source.Prc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

12 

### (5) Portland cement plants shall mon itor opacity at the following facilities: emissions units: (A) Kilns. (B) Clinker coolers. (6) Facilities Sources or emissions units that combust sewage sludge shall monitor from the effluent gas exiting the incinerator the following: (A) Total hydrocarbons. (B) Oxygen. (C) Moisture, unless an a lternative method is approved by the department and the U.S. EPA. (D) Temperature. (7) Sources or emissions units making coke from coal shall monitor opacity on the underfire stack associated with each coke oven battery. (8) Facilities Emissions units in Clark and Floyd counties that have potential to emit NO x 

### greater than or equal to fo rty (40) tons per year and are located at sources that have potential to emit NO x 

### greater than or equal to one hundred (100) tons per year shall install NO x 

### continuous emission monitors as described in 326 IAC 10-1.

(c) Upon approval by the department, the owner or operator of an emissions unit required to continuously monitor opacity und er this section may be exempted from the requirement to install, certif y, and operate a COMS if: (1) a particulate CEMS for measuring PM emissions is used to demonstrate continuous compliance with any app licable emissions limitation; and (2) the particulate CEMS is installed, cert ified, operated, and maintained on the affected source in accordance with the requirements of Performance Specification 11 (PS-11)* and Proce dure 2 of 40 CFR 60, Appendix F*.

(d) The department may require, as a c ondition of a construction or operating permit issued under 326 IAC 2

- 1, 326 IAC 2-1.1, 326 IAC 2-2, 326 IAC 2-3, 326 IAC 2-7, 326 IAC 2-8, or 326 IAC 2-9 that the owne r or operator of a new or exis ting source of air emissions monitor emissions to ensure compliance with the following: (1) An emission limitation or standard establ ished in one (1) of the permits listed in this subsection. (2) Permit requirements. (3) Monitoring requirements in 326 IAC 7.

(e) Unless explicitly stated otherwise, nothing in this rule shall: (1) excuse the owner or operator of a source or emissions unit from any monitoring, record keeping, or reporting requirement th at applies under any provision of the CAA

or state statutes or regulations; rules; or (2) restrict the authority of the department to impose additional or more restrictive monitoring, record keeping, testing, or reporting requirements on any owner or operator of a source or emissions unit under any other provision of the CAA, including Section 114(a)(1), or state statutes or regulations, rules, as applicable.Prc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

13 

### (f) Within one hundred eighty (180) days of startup or, fora source existing on the effective date of this rule, within three hundred sixty

- five (365) days of becoming an affected facility undert his rule, All continuous monitoring systems shall be installed and operational and have the certification testing complete pursuant to under section 3 of this rule within one hundred eighty (180) days of start-up of the emissions unit.

* These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies of these documents may be obtained from the Government Printin g Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for re view and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Av enue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-5-1; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2064; filed Dec 20, 2001, 4:30 p.m.: 25 IR 1596; errata filed Jan 7, 2002, 2:20 p.m.: 25 IR 1644)

SECTION 5. 326 IAC 3-5-2 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-5-2 Minimum performance and operating specifications Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4- 3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 2. Owners and operators of monitoring equipment installed to comply with this rule shall comply with the performance specif ications and operating requirements as follows: (1) Performance specifications set forth in 40 CFR 60, Appendix B*, shall be used to certify monitoring equipment installed pu rsuant to this rule; however, where reference is made to the administrato r in 40 CFR 60, Appendix B*, the term "department" shall be inserted for purposes of this rule, and where continuous emissions monitors were installed prio r to March 1983 for measuring opacity, the performance specifications in 40 CFR 60, Appendix B*, 1982 Edition, shall apply. (2) Cycling times, which include the tota l time a monitoring system requires to sample, analyze, and record an emission measurement, shall be as follows: (A) Continuous monitoring systems for measuring opacity shall complete a minimum of one (1) cycle of operation (sampling, analyzing, and data recording) for each successive ten (10) second period. (B) Continuous monitoring systems th at measure the following emissions shall complete a minimum of one (1) cy cle of operation (sampling, analyzing, and data recording) for each successive fifteen (15) minut e measuring period: (i) Carbon dioxide (CO 2 

### ). (ii) Carbon monoxide (CO). (iii) Hydrogen sulfide (H 2 

### S). (iv) Oxides of nitrogen (NO x 

### ). (v) Oxygen (O 2 

### ). (vi) Sulfur dioxide (SO 2 

### ). (vii) Total hydrocarbons (THC). (viii) Total reduced sulfur (TRS). (ix) Volatile orga nic compounds (VOC). (x) Particulate matter (PM).Prc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

14 

### (3) For opacity monitoring when effluent fr om two (2) or more affected facilities is emissions units are combined before being released to the atmosphere, the owner or operator may either install a COMS: (A) install a continuous opacity monitoring system on the combined effluent;

or (B) install a continuous opacity monitoring system comprised of, and capable of combining the signals from, compone nt transmissometers on each effluent

stream. Results shall be reported on combined efflue nt. This requirement shall not apply to facilities utilizing emissions units using wet flue gas desulfur ization equipment. For facilities emissions units using wet flue gas desulfurization equipment, opacity may be reported on the combined exhaust or on individual exhausts except as provided for facilities emissions units affected by an NSPS as described at 40 CFR 60.13(i)*. Compliance for facilities emissions units that opt to report on the individual exhausts shall be determined on the individual exhausts based on data provided in accordance with section 7 of this rule. (4) When the effluent from two (2) or more affected facilities emissions units subject to the same emission standard, other than op acity, are combined before being released to the atmosphere, the owner or operator may report the results as required for each affected facility emissions unit or for the combined effluent. (5) Instrument full-scale response or upper limit of concentration measurement range for all opacity monitoring systems shall be set at one hundred pe rcent (100%) opacity if possible. If the monitoring system is a requirement of required by 40 CFR 60*, 40 CFR 61*, 40 CFR 63*, or 40 CFR 75*, then the appropriate instrument span values and cycling times pursuant to the applicable part shall be used. In all cases, the manufacturer's procedures for calibration shall be followed and may result in an upscale maximum response of less than one hundred percent (100%). The minimum instrument full-scale response for gaseous monitoring systems shall be set at two hundred percent (200%) of the expected inst rument data displa y output corresponding to the emission limitation for the facility emissions unit unless a request for an alternative setting that provides the fo llowing information is submitted to and approved by the department and U.S. EPA in writing: (A) The proposed alternate instrument span value. (B) The expected range of pollu tant measured concentrations. (C) The control device in use. (D) The process to be controlled. (E) The location of the monito r, such as stack or duct. (F) The reason for requesting the al ternate instrument span value. (6) The department and U.S. EPA may approve locations for installing continuous monitoring systems or monitoring devices that vary from locations provided under the performance specifications of 40 CFR 60, Appendix B*, shall be approved by the departmentand the U.S. EPA upon a demonstration by the owner or operator that installation at alternative locations w ill enable accurate and representative

measurements. (7) Owners or operators of affected facilities emissions units shall conduct continuous emission monitoring system CEMS performance evaluations, upon thePrc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

15 

### request of the department or U.S. EPA, to demonstrate continuing compliance of the continuous emission monitoring systems CEMS with performance specifications as follows: (A) A performance evaluation is a quantit ative and qualitative evaluation of the performance of the continuous emission monitor in terms of: (i) accuracy; (ii) precision; (iii) reliability; (iv) representativeness; and (v) comparability; of the data acquired by the monitoring system. (B) The department or U.S. EPA may request owners or operators of affected facilities, emissions units, as defined described in section 1(b) section 1(a) of this rule, to conduct continuous emission monitoring system CEMS performance evaluations if the depart ment has reason to believe, based on review of monitoring data, quality a ssurance data, inspections, or other information, that the continuous emission monitoring sys tem CEMS is malfunctioning or may be providing inva lid data over an extended period. (C) The owner or operator of an affected emissions unit shall submit a written report containing the comple te information of the performance evaluations shall be furnished to the department within forty-five (45) days after the test date. The department or U.S. EPA may conduct performance evaluations of the continuous emission monitoring systems CEMS at any time in order to verify the continued compliance of the systems with the performance specifications.

*These documents are incorporated by refe rence. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capito l Street NW, Washingt on, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indian a Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Fl oor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-5-2; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2066; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1566; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 32)

SECTION 6. 326 IAC 3-5-3 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-5-3 Monitor system certification Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4- 3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 3. Monitor system certificatio n requirements apply to sources and facilities or emissions units subject to this rule as follows: (1) The owner or operator sh all conduct the app licable performance specifications tests in accordance with the procedures speci fied in 40 CFR 60*, orother applicable federal regulations, for the require d monitoring system as follows:Prc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

16 

### (A) Not later than one hundredeighty (180) days after a facility emissions unit start-up or initial monitor installation date. (B) Not later than forty-five (45) emissions unit operating days after the date of

monitor replacement, date, or significant monitor repair , as described in IDEM's Quality Assurance Compliance Branch Co ntinuous Emissions Monitoring Guidance Manu al, Chapter 20 (dat ed June 20, 1997)** Chapters 1 and 2* (December 1999), which affects the ability of the analyzer to function date. measure emissions accurately such as: (1) replacing or switching a majo r component of the monitor; or (2) major overhaul or reconditioning of the monitor that affects the ability of the anal yzer to measure emissions accurately. (2) The owner or operator shall notify the department in writing as follows: (A) No less than fourteen (14) days in advance of the start of continuous opacity monitor (COM) system (COMS) certification. (B) No less than thirty-five (35) days in advance of the certification of a gaseous monitoring system. (3) The owner or operator shall submit all of the required test data and information in the form of a written report to the depart ment for review and approval within fortyfive (45) days of completion of the performance specification test. (4) The department shall issue a written not ice of certification st atus upon review of the complete certification test report. A required monitoring system is certified when the department issues a certifi cation letter stating that th e required monitoring system, including all applicable co mponents, has satisfactorily met all federal and state monitoring requirements. (5) The department may decertify a require d monitoring system if an audit or performance evaluation reveals that such the monitoring system or a component thereof does not meet applicable performa nce specifications or requirements. The owner or operator shall repe at the certification process for the required monitoring system within forty-five (45) days of the date of the department's decertification of the required monitoring system.

*This document is *These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Offi ce, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review an d copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Qual ity, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue , Indianapolis, Indiana 46204.

**This documentis incorporated by reference. Copies are available for review and copying atthe Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of AirQuality, Indiana GovernmentCenter

- North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-5-3; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2067; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 33)

SECTION 7. 326 IAC 3-5-4 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:Prc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

17 

### 326 IAC 3-5-4 Standard operating procedures Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4- 3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 4. (a) The owneroroperator of each affecte d facility specified in section 1(b) of this rule, any facility subjectto 326 IAC 12, orany other facility required to monitor emissions on a continuous basis shall submitto the department, Within ninety (90) days after monitor installation, a complete, written c ontinuous monitoring standard operating procedures procedure (SOP) must be submitted to the de partment by the owner or operator of: (1) each affected source or emissions unit sp ecified in section 1(a) of this rule; or (2) any other source or emissions unit required to monitor emissions on a continuous basis.

(b) If revisions are made to the SOP, the owner or operator must submitupdates shall be submitted to the department biennially. within two (2) years of the revisions.

(c) At a minimum, the SOP shall describe complete step-by-st ep procedures and operations as follows: (1) A description of the facility emissions unitmonitored. (2) A listing of the following for each monitor: (A) Each monitor's brand. (A) Manufacturer's name. (B) Model number. (C) Serial number. (D) Monitoring location. (E) Data handling and acquisition system. (3) Examples of all re porting and log forms. (4) Record keeping and reporting pro cedures that include the following: (A) Reporting of instrument precision and accuracy. (B) Reporting of emissions data. (5) Methods and procedures for analysis and data acquisition. (6) Calibration procedures that include the following: (A) Calibration error limits and linearity. (B) Calibration gas type, gas quality, and traceability to the National Institute of Standards and Technology. (C) Calibration frequency. (D) Criteria for recalibration, and analysis procedures to periodically verify the accuracy of span and calibration standards. (7) Operation procedur es that include: (A) daily procedures; (B) quantifying and recording daily zero (0 ) and high level drift that meet the requirements of: (i) 40 CFR 60, Appendix B*, Performance Specification 2, Section 4.2; or (ii) other applicable regulations; andPrc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

18 

### (C) other operating parameter checks i ndicating correct operational status. (8) Quality control and quality assurance procedures that include the following: (A) A statement of quality policy and objectives. (B) Organization and respons ibilities description. (C) Calibration and span a nd zero (0) drif t criteria. (D) Excessive drift criteria. (E) Corrective action for excessive drift. (F) Precision and accuracy audits. (G) Corrective action for accuracy audits failure. (H) Data validity criteria. (I) Participation in department audits. (J) Data recording and calculation audits. (9) Preventive maintenance procedures a nd corrective maintenance procedures that include those procedures taken to ensure continuous operation and to minimize malfunctions. (10) A listing of the manufacturer's recommended spare parts inventory.

(b) (d) If a facility emissions unit owner or operator fails to submit a SOP or submits a SOP that fails to address the factors procedures and operations provided under subsection (a), (c), the department may require a performance evaluation pursuant to section 2 of this rule.

*This document is incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capito l Street NW, Washingt on, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indian a Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Fl oor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-5-4; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2068; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 34)

SECTION 8. 326 IAC 3-5-5 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-5-5 Quality assurance requirements Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4- 3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 5. (a) Except where for affected units under 40 CFR 75* is applicable for affected facilities underthe acid rain program that are also emissions units subject to this rule, quality assurance requirements specified in this section and 40 CFR 60*, Appendix F, apply to continuous emission monitors that monitor the following: (1) Carbon dioxide (CO 2 

### ). (2) Carbon monoxide (CO). (3) Hydrogen sulfide (H 2 

### S). (4) Nitrogen oxide (NO x 

### ). (5) Oxygen (O 2 

### ). (6) Sulfur dioxide (SO 2 

### ).Prc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

19 

### (7) Total hydrocarbons (THC). (8) Total reduced sulfur (TRS). (9) Volatile organic compounds (VOC). (10) Particulate matter (PM).

(b) Facilities Emissions units that are also subject to 40 CFR 75* shall follow the quality assurance procedures of 40 CFR 75* and report the results in accordance with subsection (e). (f).

(c) Quality control (QC) requirements for continuous opacity monitoring systems COMS are as follows: (1) For calibration drift (CD) assessment, the COMS shall be checked at least once daily. The CD shall be quantif ied and recorded at zero (0) (or low level) and upscale level opacity. The COMS shall be adjusted whenever the CD exceeds the specification of 40 CFR 60, Appendix B *, Performance Specification 1 (PS-1), and the COMS shall be declared out of control when the CD exceeds twice the specification of PS-1. Correctiv e actions, followed by a validating CD assessment, are required when the COMS is out of control. (2) For fault indicators assessment, the fau lt lamp indicators, data acquisition system error messages, and other system self-diagnos tic indicators shall be checked at least daily. Appropriate corrective actions shall be taken when the COMS is operating outside the preset limits. (3) For performance audits, checks of th e individual COMS components and factors affecting the accuracy of the monitoring data, as described in this subdivision, shall be conducted, at a minimum, on a calendar quarter basis. The absolute minimum checks included in the performance audit are as follows: (A) The status of the optical alignmen t of the monitor co mponents shall be checked and recorded according to th e procedure specified by the monitor manufacturer. Monitor components mu st be realigned as necessary. (B) The apparent effluent opacity shall be compared and recorded before and after cleaning each of the exposed optical surfaces. The total optical surface dust accumulation shall be determined by summing up the apparent reductions in opacity for all of the optical surfaces that are cleaned. Caution s hould be employed in performing this check since fluctuations in effluentopacity occurring during the cleaning cycle may adversely affect the results. (C) The zero (0) and upscale response errors shall be determined and recorded according to the CD procedures. The errors are defined as the difference (in percent opacity) between the correct va lue and the observed value for the zero (0) and high level calibration checks. (D) The value of the zero (0) compensa tion applied at the time of the audit shall be calculated as equivalent opac ity, corrected to stack exit conditions, according to the procedures specified by the manufacturer. The compensation applied to the effluent recorded by th e monitor system shall be recorded. (E) The optical pathlength correction ratio (OPLR) shall be computed from the monitor pathlength and stack exit di ameter and shall be compared, and the difference recorded, to the monitor setup OPLR value. The stack exitPrc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

20 

### correlation error shall be determined as the absolute value of the difference between the measured value and the correct value, expressed as a percentage of the correct value. (F) A three-point calibrati on error test of the COMS shall be conducted. Three (3) neutral density filters meeting the re quirements of PS-1 shall be placed in the COMS light beam path. The mon itor response shall be independently recorded from the COMS permanent data recorder. Make A total of five (5) nonconsecutive readings for each filter shall be made. The low-range, midrange, and high-range calibration error resu lts shall be computed as the mean difference and ninety-five percent (95%) confidence in terval for the difference between the expected and the actual res ponses of the monitor as corrected to stack exit conditions. These values shall be calculated using the procedure of PS-1, Section 8.0. The following are requirements for these values: (i) The calibration error test require s the installation of an external calibration audit device (zero-jig). The zero-jig shall be adjusted to provide the same zero (0) response as the monitor's simulated zero (0). (ii) Use calibration attenuators, that is, neutral density filters or screens, with values that have been determined according to PS-1, Section 7.1.3, "Attenuator Calibr ation", and produce simulated opacities (as corrected to stack exit conditions) in the ranges listed in Table 1-2 in PS-1. (iii) The stability of the attenuator values shall be checked at least once per year according to the procedures specified in PS-1. The attenuators shall be recalibrated if the stability checks indicate a change of two percent (2%) opacity or greater. (4) The following are requirements for monitor acceptance criteria: (A) The following criteria are to be used for determining to determine if the COMS audit results are acceptable: TABLE 1. PERFORMANCE AUDIT CRITERIA
Stack Exit Correlation Error ≤ 2 percent Zero and Upscale Responses ≤ 2 percent opacity
Zero Compensation ≤ 4 percent opacity Optical Alignment Misalignment error
≤ 2 percent opacity Optical Surface Dust Accumulation ≤ 4 percent opacity
Calibration Error ≤ 3 percent opacity (B) The COMS is out of control wh enever the results of a quarterly performance audit indicate noncompliance with any of the performance assessment criteria of Table 1 in clause (A ). If the COMS is out of control, the owner or operator must shall take the action necessary to eliminate the problem. Following correc tive action, the source or emissions unit owner or operator must shall reconduct the appropriate fail ed portion of the audit and other applicable po rtions to determine whether the COMS is operating properly and within specifications. The COMS owner or opera tor shall record both audit results showing the COMS to be out of control and the results following corrective action. COMS data obtained during any outof controlPrc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

21 

### period may notbe used for co mpliance determination; the datamay be used foridentifying periods where there has been a failure to meetquality

assurance and control criteria. (C) Repeated audit failures, that is, out of control conditions resulting from revealed in the quarterly audits, indicate that the QC procedures are inadequate or the COMS is incapable of providing quality data. The source or emissions unitowner or operator shall: (i) increase the frequency of the above QC procedures in this subsection until the performance criteria are maintained; or (ii) modify or replace the COMS whenever two (2) consecutive quarters of unacceptable performance occur. (5) The performance audit calculations contained in PS-1, Se ction 8 shall be followed.

(d) Except where 40 CFR 75* is a pplicable for aff ected facilities emissions units under the acid rain program, and except for peaking unit s as defined in 326 IAC 3

- 4

- 1(13), quality control requirements for fl ow monitoring systems are as follows: (1) For CD assessment, the flow monitori ng system shall be checked at least once daily. The CD shall be quantif ied and recorded at zero (0) (or low level) and upscale level. The flow monitoring systems shall be adjusted whenever the CD exceeds the specification of 40 CFR 60, Appendix B, Performance Specification 6 (PS-6)*, and the flow monitoring systems shall be decl ared out of control when the CD exceeds twice the specification of PS-6. Corrective actions, foll owed by a validating CD assessment, are required when the flow m onitoring system is out of control. (2) An annual relative accuracy test.

(e) A peaking unit as defined in 326 IAC 3

- 4

- 1(13) shall comply with the following quality control requirements: (1) The owner or operator of a peaking unit, based on information submitted by the designated r epresentative in the monitoring plan, shall comply with one (1) of the following: (A) Meet the general operating re quirements in 40 CFR 75.10* for a NO X 

### CEMS. (B) Provide information satisfacto ry to the commissioner using the procedure specified in 40 CFR 75, Appendix E* for estimating hourly NO X 

### emission rate, subject to the following: (i) If, in the years after certifica tion of an excepted monitoring system under 40 CFR 75, Appendix E*, an emissions unit's operations exceed a capacity factor of twenty per cent (20%) in any calendar year or exceed a capacity factor of ten and zero

- tenths percent (10.0%) averaged over three (3) years, the owner or operator shall install, certify, and operate a NO X 

### - diluent CEMS no later than December 31 of the following calend ar year. (ii) If the required CEMS has not been installed and certified by the date in item (i), the owne r or operator shall report the maximum potential NO X 

### emission rate, as defined in 40 CFRPrc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

22 

### 72.2*, for each unit operating hour , starting with the first u nit operating hour after the deadline and continuing until the CEMS has been provisionally certified. (2) The owner or operator of a peaking unit, as defined in 326 IAC 3-4-1(13), shall conduct a relative accuracy test a udit (RATA) on any required CEMS as specified in 40 CFR 60, Appendix F* or as follows: (A) Except for mercury monitoring systems and as otherwise specified in 40 CFR 75.21(a)(6)*, 40 CFR 75.21(a )(7)*, or 40 CFR 75, Appendix B, Section 2.3.1.2*, RATA shall be perf ormed once every two (2) succ essive quality assurance (QA) operating quarters for each primary and redundant backup: (i) SO 2 

### pollutant concentration monitor; (ii) flow monitor; (iii) CO 2 

### emissions concentration monitor, including O 2 

### monitors used to determine CO 2 

### emissions; (iv) CO 2 

### o r O 2 

### diluent monitor used to determine heat input; (v) moisture monitoring system; (vi) NO X 

### concentration monitoring system; (vii) NO X 

### - diluent CEMS; or (viii) SO 2 

### - diluent CEMS. (B) (1) For each primary and redundant backup mercury concentration monitoring system and each sorbent trap monitoring system, RATAs shall be performed once every four (4) successive QA operating quarters. (C) (2) A calendar quarter that does not qualify as a QA operating quarter shall be excluded in determin ing the deadline for the next RATA. (D) (3) Not more than eight (8) successi ve calendar quarters shall elapse after the quarter in which a RATA was last performed without a subsequent RATA having been conducted. (E) (4) If a RATA has not been completed by the end of the eighth calendar quarter since the quarter of the last RATA, then the RATA must be completed within a seven hund red twenty (720) unit, or stack, operating hour grace period, as provided in 40 CFR 75, Appendix B, Section 2.3.3,* following the end of the eighth successive elapsed calendar quarter, or data from the CEMS will become invalid. (F) The relative accuracy test audit frequency of a CEMS may be reduced, as specified in 40 CFR 75, Appendix B, Section 2.3.1.2*, for primary or redundant back up monitoring systems th at qualify for less frequent testing. (G) All required RATAs shall be p erformed in accordance with the applicable procedures and provision s in 40 CFR 75, Appendix A, Sections 6.5 through 6.5.2.2* and 40 CFR 75, Appe ndix B, Sections 2.3.1.3* and 2.3.1.4*. ( H) For a CO monitor and any other applicable monitor as determined by the commissioner, a RATA shall be performed in accordance with the requirements of this subdivision.Prc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

23 

### (e) (f) Reporting requirements for performance audits are as follows: (1) Owners or operators of facilities emissions units required to conduct: (A) cylinder gas audit; (B) relative accuracy test audit; or (C) continuous opacity mon itor calibration error audit; on continuous emission monitors shall prepar e a written report of the results of the performance audit for each calendar quarter, or for othe r periods required by the department. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports shall be submitted to the department within thirty (30) calendar days after the end of each quarter for cylinder gas audits and continuous opacity monitor calibration error audits and within forty-five (45) calenda r days after the completion of the test for relative accuracy test audits. (2) The performance audit report shall contain the following information: (A) Plant and monitor inform ation, including the following: (i) The plant name and address. (ii) The monitor brand or manufacturer's name, model, and serial number. (iii) The monitor span. (iv) The monitor location. for example, duct, boiler, unit, o rstack designation. (B) Performance audit inform ation, including the following: (i) The auditor's name. (ii) A copy of the audit st andard's certification. for example, the vendor's Protocol 1 certification, orneutral density filtercertification. (iii) All data used to calculate the audit results. (iv) The audit results and an indication if the monitor passed or failed the audit. If the performance aud it results show the CEMS or COMS to be out of control, the CEMS or COMS owner or operator must shall report both the audit results showing the CEMS or COMS to be out of control and the results of the aud it following corrective action showing the COMS to be operati ng within specification. (v) Any corrective actions performed as the result of a failed audit.

(f) If (g) Whenever a relative accuracy test audit of any continuous emission monitor listed in subsection (a) or (e) is performed, the department must be notified in accordance with the protocol requirements of 326 IAC 3-6-2 at least thirty-five (35) days prior to the audit.

*These documents are incorporated by refe rence. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capito l Street NW, Washingt on, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indian a Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Fl oor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-5-5; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2069; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 34)Prc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

24 

### SECTION 9. 326 IAC 3-5-6 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-5-6 Record keeping requirements Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4- 3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 6. (a) On and after the certification of a monitoring system, the owner or operator of a source or emissions unit subject to this rule shall maintain records, including raw data, of all monitoring data and supporting informa tion for a minimum of five (5) years from the date of any of the following: (1) A monitoring sample. (2) A measurement. (3) A test. (4) A certification. (5) A report. (6) Any other activity requ ired under this article.

(b) The records described in subsec tion (a) shall incl ude the following: (1) All documentation relating to: (A) design, installati on, and testing of all elements of the monitoring system; and (B) required corrective action or compliance plan activities. (2) All maintenance logs, calibration check s, and other required quality assurance activities. (3) All records of correct ive and preventive action. (4) A log of plant operations, including emission unit or monitoring system downtime with the following information: (A) Date of facility emissions unit or monitoring system downtime. (B) Time of commencement and completion of each downtime. (C) Reason for each downtime. (D) Nature of system repairs and adjustments.

(c) The owner or operator of a source or emissions unit subject to this rule shall maintain the records required by this section at the source oratsuch other site, in a manner

so thatthey may be inspected by and make them available to the department or the U.S. EPA if so requested orrequired. upon request. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-5- 6; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2071)

SECTION 10. 326 IAC 3-5-7 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-5-7 Reporting requirements Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4- 3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17Prc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

25 

### Sec. 7. (a) The following reporting requirements apply to sources owner or operator of a source or emissions unit subject to this rule shall submit a monito ring report to the department in accordance with this section.

(b) The owner or operator shall submit the monitoring report in accordance with the following requirements: (1) The owner or operator of sources or emissions units subject to the requirements of section 1 of this rule shall report excess emissions no less frequently than quarterly. For sources required to report the owner or operator of a source or emissions unit for which quarterly such reports are required, the reports shall be: (A) submitted by the facility source or emissions unit owner or operator to the department; and (B) postmarked or delivered by other mean s no later than thirty (30) calendar days following the last day of the reporting period. (2) If a permit specifies or a rule re quires more freque nt reports, such the reports shall be: (A) submitted by the facility source or emissions unit owner or operator to the department; and (B) postmarked or delivered by other mean s no later than fifteen (15) calendar days after the e nd of each month. (3) Gaseous excess emissions data reports sh all be reported using three (3) hour block periods ending at: (A) 03:00; (B) 06:00; (C) 09:00; (D) 12:00; (E) 15:00; (F) 18:00; (G) 21:00; and (H) 24:00; Forfacilities that unless the emissions unit must demonstrate compliance with hourly (one (1) hour), a different averaging period as specified by an applicable rule or permit condition, such as, daily (twenty-four (24) hour) average, or thirty (30) day averages. such information shall be submitted as part of the quarterly report required in this section.

(4) (c) The monitoring report shall contai n the following continuous monitoring information summaries, with all times reported in real time: (A) (1) Monitored facility emission unit operation time during th e reporting period. (B) (2) Excess emissions or parameters, as applicable, reported in units of the standard, or the applicable parameter unit as follows: (i) (A) Date of excess emissions, or other applicable dates. (ii) (B) Time of commencement and comple tion for each applicable parameter deviation or excess emission data. (C) (3) Magnitude of each excess emission as follows: (i) (A) For opacity as follows:Prc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

26 

### (AA) (i) The actual percent opacity of all six (6) minute (block) averages exceeding the applicable opacity limit shall be reported. If the an exceedance occurs continuously beyond one (1) six (6) minute period, the percent opacity for eac h six (6) minute period or the highest six (6) minute average opacity for the entire period shall be reported. (BB) (ii) For department approved opacity averaging times other than six (6) minutes, the actual percent opacity of each averaging period in excess of the applicable limit shall be reported. (CC) (iii) A summary by cause shall be pr epared and submitted as part of this report itemiz ing exceedances by cause. (ii) (B) For gaseous emissions, the excess emi ssions, in units of the applicable standard, must be reported based on the applicable averaging time, for example, one (1) hour block, three (3) hour block, three (3) hourrolling, in addition to any other repor ting requirements that may be applicable. The averaging time is specified in the applicable federal or state rules, or facility in the operating permit for the emissions unit. (5) (4) Continuous monitoring system instrument downtime, except for zero (0) and span checks, which shall be reported separately, shall include the following: (A) Date of downtime. (B) Time of commencement. (C) Duration of each downtime. (D) Reasons for each downtime. (E) Nature of system repairs and adjustments.

(d) If there are no excess emissions or monitor downtime in a reporting period, the owner or operator of a emissions unit subject to this rule shall submit a report indicating that no excess emissions or do wntime incidents occu rred in the reporting period that includes the start and end dates of the time period. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-5-7; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2071)

SECTION 11. 326 IAC 3-5-8 IS ADDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-5-8 Operation and maintenance of continuous emission monitoring and continuous opacity monitoring systems Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4- 3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 8. (a) This section applies to th e operation and maintenance of CEMS and COMS.

(b) The owner or operator of a CEMS or COMS required by federal or state regulations or permit shall: (1) install; (2) calibrate; (3) maintain;Prc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

27 

### (4) operate; and (5) certify; such CEMS or COMS, and related equipment in accordance with applicable federal regulations, this rule, and any applicable permits.

(c) Except for periods when the: (1) affected emissions unit is not operating; (2) affected source or emissions unit is operating under a scenario that does not require CEMS or COMS; (3) the owner or operator is repairing the CEMS or COMS; (3) (4) CEMS or COMS is experiencing a malfunction; or (4) (5) owner/operator is conducting CEMS or COMS quality assurance and quality control activities, in cluding, but not limited to: (A) calibration checks; (B) zero and span adjustments; (C) calibration gas audits; or (D) other required quality assurance/quality control activities; all CEMS and COMS shall be in continuous operation.

(d) Except as otherwise provided by a rule or provided specifically in a permit, if a CEMS or COMS is malfunctioning or will be down for calibration, maintenance, or repairs for a period of twenty-four (24) ho urs or more, the owner or operator of the CEMS or COMS shall perform supplementa l monitoring in accordance with the permit.

(e) The owner or operator of the CEMS or COMS shall do the following: (1) Keep records: (A) in accordance with sectio n 6(b) of this rule; and (B) that describe the supplemental monitoring implemented during any downtime to assure compliance with applicable emission limitations. (2) Submit reports, as applicable, in a ccordance with section 7 of this rule. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-5-8)

SECTION 12. 326 IAC 3-6-1 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-6-1 Applicability; test procedures Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4- 3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 1. This rule applies to any facility emissions unit emissions testing performed to determine compliance with applicable emission limitations contained in this title, or for any other purpose requiring review an d approval by the department. (such as an al ternate emission factor determination). The owner or operator of an emissions unit shall conduct emission tests subject to this rule shall be conducted in accordance with any applicable procedures and analysis methods speci fied in 40 CFR 51*, 40 CFR 60*, 40 CFR 61*, 40 CFR 63*, 40 CFR 75*, or other proce dures approved by the department and U.S. EPA.Prc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

28 

### *These documents are incorporated by refe rence. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capito l Street NW, Washingt on, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indian a Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Fl oor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-6-1; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2072; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 36)

SECTION 13. 326 IAC 3-6-2 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-6-2 Source sampling protocols Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4- 3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 2. (a) When an emissions test is to be performed by any person other than the department, the source or emissions unit owner or operator shall complete a test protocol form and submit the test protocol form to the de partment not later than thirty-five (35) days prior to the intended test date unless more notice is required under the applicable program. Such rule requires additional notice. The test protocol shall: (1) be on a form approved by the department; or shall (2) contain information equivalent to that required on the form approved by the department. The department shall evaluate and approve the test protocol prior it to it being implemented. If the department does not notify the owner or operator prior to the test date that the protocol has not been a pproved, the protocol is deemed approved.

(b) After evaluating the completed test protocol form, the department may: (1) inspect the test site; or (2) require additional conditions, including, but not limited to: (A) requiring reasonable modifications to the stack or duct to obtain acceptable test conditions; (B) requiring additional tests to allow for adverse conditions; such as interferences, nonsteady, orcycli c processes; (C) keeping process operat ing parameter records, ope rating logs, or charts during the test; (D) placing conditions on control equipment operation to make the operation of control equipment representative of normal operation; or (E) recording specified control equipm ent operating parameters during the

test.

(c) If the department requires modification to: (1) test methods; (2) analytical methods; (3) operational parameters; orPrc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

29 

### (4) other matters included in the emissions test protocol; the department shall notify the source or emissions unit owner or operator and the testing firm by letter or telephone not la ter than twenty-one (21) da ys prior to the test date.

(d) If the source or emissions unit owner or operator or test firm desires to make a minor change to previously submitted procedures or conditions, the department shall be notified of such the minor change as soon as practicable prior to the intended emissions test date. Such The minor changes shall not be made unless approved by the department prior to the emission test.

(e) Reasonable changes in the emissions te st protocol that re sult from emergency conditions during the test shall be approved by the department if a department staff person is available at the test site, before the test may proceed.

(f) Post-test approval may be granted ba sed on reasonable changes resulting from emergency or reasonably unfores eeable conditions during the test.

(g) The department reserves the right to conduct any portion of the reference method tests using equipment supplied by the department . Notice of acceptable test procedures shall be given to the owner or operator of the source or emissions unit and its testing representative.

(h) The source or emissions unit owner or operator shall schedule an actual test date and time period and notify the department not later than fourteen (14) days prior to the actual test date. In the event that a previously scheduled test must be canceled and rescheduled, the owner or operator of the source or emissions unitshall notify the department no less than fourteen (14) days in advance of the rescheduled test date. Tests rescheduled for less than fourteen (14) days after noti fying the department of the res cheduled test date must be approved by the department. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-6-2; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2072)

SECTION 14. 326 IAC 3-6-3 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-6-3 Emission testing Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4- 3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 3. (a) Department staff may obser ve field test procedures and source or emissions unitoperation during the emission test.

(b) The owner or operator of a sou rce or emissions unit shall conduct all emission tests shall be conducted as follows: (1) While The facility emissions unitbeing tested is shall be operating according to clause (A) or (B), except as allowed under clause (C), as follows: (A) At a minimum, ninety-five percent (95%) to one hundred percent(100%) of its the permitted maximum emissions unitoperating capacity description.Prc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

30 

### (B) Under conditions of worst case emissions, and if the worst case emission condition is not known, then the worst case emission condition shall be assumed to be the maximum process or operating rate of the emissions unit as listed in the p ermit's emissions unit description. (C) Under other capacities or conditi ons as specified in an applicable requirement or approved by the department. As used in this clause, "capacity" means the design capaci ty of the emissions unit or other operating capacities agreed to by th e owner or operator of the emissions unit and the department, including, butnot limited to, process conditions when the department believes that chan ges in the operating capacities or operating conditions have the potent ial to affect emission levels. (2) Under conditions representative of normal operations. (3) Underother capacities or conditions specified and approved by the department. As used in this subdivision, "capacity" means the design capacity of the facility or other operating capacities agreed to by the source and the department. (2) All test runs for a given polluta nt shall be conducted within twenty

- four (24) forty-eight (48) hours unless process variables or mandatory test lengths of greater than two (2) hours make this impr acticable. In these cases, the testing shall be conducted on consecutive days. Other periods or duration may be approved by the commissioner if specifi c testing circumstances require a longer testing time frame

.
(c) Facilities Emissions units subject to 326 IAC 12, New Source Performance Standards, 326 IAC 14, or 326 IAC 20 Hazardous AirPollutants, shall be tested under conditions as specified in the appl icable provision for that facility emissions unitin 40 CFR 60*, 40 CFR 61*, or 40 CFR 63* and this rule where appropriate.

(d) The owner or operator of a source or emissions unit shall make available at the test site calibration results of the various sampling components. The information shall include the following: (1) The date or dates th e test was performed. (2) The methods used. (3) The calibration data. (4) The results. All components requiring calibrati on shall be calibrated within si xty (60) days prior to the actual test date. Post-test calibrations shall be performed on the components not later than forty-five (45) days after the actual test date. Components requi ring calibration are listed in the federal test methods specified in section 5 of this rule.

(e) The department may perform or require the performance of aud its of equipment or procedures associated with the test series up to the time of the actual performance of the test, between test runs, or following the test series. The department reserves the right to perform or observe all associated analyses.Prc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

31 

### (f) The original or a photocopy of the raw field data generated during the test series shall be provided to the department observer upon request if such the request may be reasonably met under the existing circumstances.

*These documents are incorporated by refe rence. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capito l Street NW, Washingt on, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indian a Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Fl oor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-6-3; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2073; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 37)

SECTION 15. 326 IAC 3-6-4 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-6-4 Reporting Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4- 3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 4. (a) All emission tests for which a test protocol form was submitted pursuant

to the department under section 2 of this rule shall be reported to the department in the form of an emission test report c ontaining the following information: (1) The reported testing methods and result s certified as true and accurate and in compliance with this rule by the person res ponsible for conducting the emissions test. (2) Information regarding the test, including the following: (A) A stack test result summary ta ble that compares the measured emissions, in units consistent with the applicable emissions limitations, to the emissions limitations. (A) (B) A description of the facility or facilities emissions unit or units being tested. (B) (C) The date or dates on whic h the test was performed. (C) (D) The type of tests conducted. (D) (E) The type of process and control equipment utilized. (E) (F) The source name and location. (F) (G) The purpose of the tests. (G) (H) The test participants and their titles. (3) Tabulated data and results , including the following: (A) The process weight ra te or heat input rate. (B) The referenced or de rived conversion factors. (C) The stack gas flow rate. (D) Measured emissions given in units c onsistent with the applicable emission limitations. (E) The average value of emission s from any continuous gaseous emissions monitoring system in units consistent with the applicable emission limitations if applicable to the pollutant being tested. (E) (F) If applicable, visible emissions observations or six (6) minute average continuous opacity monitor readings.Prc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

32 

### (F) Average value of emissions from any continuous gaseous emissions monitoring system in units consistentwith the applicable emission limitations if

applicable to the pollutant being tested. (4) A description of process and cont rol devices, includ ing the following: (A) A process flow diagram. (B) The maximum design capacities. (C) A fuel analysis and heat value for heat input rate determinations. (D) The process and control equipment operating conditions. (E) A discussion of variations from normal plant operations. (F) The stack height. (G) The exit diameter. (H) The volumetric flow rate (cubic feet per minute). (I) The exit temperature. (J) The exit velocity. (5) A description of sampling methods used, including the following: (A) A brief discussion of the an alytical procedures with justifications for any variance from reference method procedures. (B) Specification of the following: (i) The number of sampling points. (ii) The time per point. (iii) The total sampling time per run. (C) A cross-sectional diagram of the sa mpling site showing sampling points. (D) A diagram showing the following: (i) The stack dimensions. (ii) The sampling location. (iii) The distance from the neares t flow disturbance upstream and downstream of the sampling points. (iv) The diagram of the sampling train. (6) Sampling and analytical proced ures used, including the following: (A) Results and calculations , including the following: (i) Units consistent with the applicable emission limitation. (ii) One (1) complete calculation usi ng actual data for each type of test performed. (iii) Raw production data si gned by the source official. (iv) Photocopies of a ll actual field data. (B) A laboratory report, in cluding the following: (i) The chain of custody. (ii) Copies of all calibration data for equipment used in sampling as described in section 3(d) of this rule. (C) Applicable rules and regulations showing the emission limitations. (D) For particulate matter tests, If applicable, copies of visible emissions evaluations or opacity monitor readings. (E) Copies of any continuous gaseous emissions monitoring system readings for gaseous pollutant tests.Prc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

33 

### (b) The owner or operator of a sou rce or emissions unit shall submitall emission test reports mustbe received by to the department not later than forty-five (45) days after the completion of the testing. An extension ma y be granted by the department if the owner or operator of the source or emissions unitsubmits to the departme nt a reasonable written explanation for the requested exte nsion not later than five (5) days prior to the end of the initial forty-five (45) day period. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-6-4; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2073)

SECTION 16. 326 IAC 3-6-5 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-6-5 Specific testing pro cedures; particulate matter; PM 10 

### ; PM 2.5 

### ; sulfur dioxide; nitrogen oxides; volatile organic compounds Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4- 3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 5. (a) Tests for particulate matter tests (PM), PM 10 

### , and PM 2.5 

### shall be conducted in accordance with the following procedures: (1) For PM: 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 5*, 5A*, 5B*, 5C*, 5D*, 5E*, or 5F*, or Method 17*, as applicable, or other procedures approved by the department and U.S. EPA. (2) For PM 10 

### and PM 2.5 

### : 40 CFR 51, Appendix M, Method 201* or 201A*, and 202*. The measurement of condensible condensable PM 10 

### using the procedures described in Method 202* is not required if the applicable emission limitation is contained at 326 IAC 6.8-2, unless otherw ise specified by 326 IAC 6.5 or 326 IAC 6.8. 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 5*, in conjunction with Method 202*, may also be used, subject to the appr oval of the department and U.S. EPA. Other procedures to measure PM 10 

### and PM 2.5 

### may be approved by the department and U.S. EPA. (2) (3) Visible emissions (VE) evaluations sha ll be performed in conjunction with a particulate emissions PM, PM 10 

### , PM 2.5 

### , or other mass emission rate test of air pollutants, as required by the depar tment. The VE evaluations shall be conducted by a qualified observer in accordance with the procedures contained in 326 IAC 5-1-4. VE readings shall be continuo usly recorded for at least thirty (30) minutes per hour of sampling tim e for each sampling repetition, unless a longer time is otherwise mandated by federal regulation. A waiver from this requirement may be granted by the on

- site department staff person or on-site department staff person if adverse conditions exist that would invalidate th e VE readings. Wai vers from this requirement may be granted by the depa rtment for emissions units operating with a PM CEMS. Complete waivers from the requirement to conduct VE readings during a compliance test may not be granted to facilities for the emissions unit required to complete opacity testing pursuan t to 40 CFR 60.8* or 40 CFR 63*

. VE readings are not required for units when operating a certified PM CEMS. Facilities Emissions units equipped with continuous opacity monitors may submit the six (6) minute integr ated readings of such the monitors during the sampling period, instead of performing VE evaluations, provided:Prc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

34 

### (A) the monitoring system meets the pe rformance specifications as specified in 40 CFR 60, Appendix B*, and is, or wi ll be, certified by the department; and (B) the monitor readings submitted with th e test include a zero (0) and upscale calibration check before the first test run and following the end of the final

run; and (C) if more than one (1) day of test ing is required to complete the three (3) runs, the zero (0) and span checks shall be performed at the beginning of each day's testing and at the conclusion of each day's final run. (3) (4) At least three (3) repetitions of the te st shall be performed under consistent facility emissions unit operating conditions unless otherwise allowed by the department. For boiler emissions testing, at least one (1) of the three (3) repetitions shall be conducted during a normal sootblow ing cycle that is consistent with frequency and duration normally experienced. (4) (5) At Richmond Power and Light's Wh itewater Generating Station, when sootblowing occurs during one (1) of the three (3) repeti tions, emission test results shall be evaluated using either a time weighted averaging period (TWAP) or a straight averaging technique. When usi ng TWAP, the following equation shall be used to ensure proper weighting of an intermittent cleaning cycle performance test run regardless of the length of the cleani ng cycle and regardless of the number and duration of the test runs made on the un it. When using TWAP, the representative pounds per hour of particulate emissions sh all be calculated using the following equation:

Where: E = Pounds per hour of particulate emissions.
E cc 

### = Average E of sample containing cleaning cycle.
E ncc 

### = Average E of sample containing no cleaning cycle. A = Hours of cleaning cycle operation during sample. B = Hours with no cleaning cycle operation during sample. R = Average hours of operati on per twenty-four (24) hours. S = Average hours of cleaning cycle operation per twenty -four (24) hours. (5) (6) Only those fuels representative of normal fuel quality used during normal operations shall be combusted. (6) (7) During each repetition, each sampling poi nt shall be sampled for a minimum of two (2) minutes. (7) (8) The total test time per repetition sha ll be no less than sixty (60) minutes. (8) (9) The total sample volume per repetition shall be no less than thirty (30) dry standard cubic feet (dscf). (9) (10) The total particulate weight collected from the sampling nozzle, probe, cyclone (if used), filter holde r (front half), filter, and connecting glassware, and, if required in subdivision (2), the impinger catch, shall be reported to the department. and U.S. EPA. Particulate analysis of the impin ger catch is notrequired, unless specified by the department.Prc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

35 

### (b) The owner or operator shall conduct sulfur dioxide (SO 2 

### ) tests shall be conducted in accordance with the following procedures: (1) 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6*, 6A*, or 6C*, or 8*, as applicable, or other procedures approved by the department and U.S. EPA. (2) At least three (3) repetitions of two (2) samples, each according to 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6* or 6A*, or 6C*, or three (3) repetitions according to 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6C* or 8*, performed under identical facility emissions unit operating conditions, shall constitute a test. For boiler emissions testing, only those fuels representative of fuel qua lity during normal operations shall be combusted. (3) During each o f the repetitions for40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 8*, each sampling pointshall be sampled for a minimum of two (2) minutes. (4) (3) The total test time per repetition shall be as follows: (A) For tests using 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6* or 6A*, or 6 C*, a minimum of twenty (20) minutes per r un with a thirty (30) minute interval between each run. (B) For tests using 40 CFR 60, Appe ndix A, Method 6C*, a minimum of sixty (60) minutes per run. (B) (C) For tests using 40 CFR 60, Appe ndix A, Method 8*, a minimum of sixty (60) minutes per run, with the following criteria: (i) During each of the repetitions, each sampling point shall be sampled for a minimum of two (2) minutes. (5) (ii) The total sample volume per repetition under 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 8*, shall be no less than forty (40) dry standard cubic feet (dscf). (iii) During each of the repetitions , the sample rate shall not exceed one (1) cubic foot per minute (cfm).

(c) The owner or operator shall conduct nitrogen oxide (NO x 

### ) tests shall be conducted according to the following procedures: (1) 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 7*, 7A*, 7B*, 7C*, or 7E*, as applicable, or other procedures approv ed by the department and U.S. EPA. (2) For Methods 7*, 7A*, 7B*, or 7C*, at least three (3) re petitions of four (4) samples each shall constitute a test. (3) For Method 7E*, three (3) test runs, ea ch a minimum of sixty (60) minutes, shall constitute a test.

(d) The owner or operator shall conduct volatile organic compounds (VOC) emissions tests shall be con ducted in accordance with the following procedures: (1) 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 25*, or other procedures approved by the department and U.S. EPA, shall be used for the total nonmethane organic emissions. (2) At least three (3) samples sh all be collected and analyzed. (3) The total test time per repetition sha ll be a minimum of sixty (60) minutes. (4) Bulk gasoline terminals subject to 326 IAC 20-10 shall be tested in accordance with 40 CFR 63, Subpart R*. All other bulk gasoline terminals shallPrc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

36 

### be tested in accordance with the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) at 40 CFR 60, Subpart XX*. During all comp liance tests, 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 21* shall be used for determinin g whether there are any leaks from the hatches or flanges of the gasoline tran sports. If any leak is detected, the transport shall not be used for the capacity of the compliance test of the bulk gasoline terminal. The threshold for leaks shall be as follows: (A) Five hundred (500) parts per mi llion methane for all bulk gasoline terminals subject to 40 CFR 63, Subpart R*. (B) Ten thousand (10,000) parts per mi llion (as methane) for all bulk gasoline terminals subject to 40 CFR 60, Subpart XX* and for all other bulk gasoline terminals.

*These documents are incorporated by refe rence. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capito l Street NW, Washingt on, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indian a Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Fl oor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-6-5; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2074; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 37)

SECTION 17. 326 IAC 3

- 6

- 6 IS ADDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3

- 6

- 6 Test invalidation Authority: IC 13

- 14

- 8; IC 13

- 17

- 3

- 4; IC 13

- 17

- 3

- 11 Affected: IC 13

- 14

- 4

- 3; IC 13

- 15; IC 13

- 17

Sec. 6. Based on the department's evaluation, any test series o r test run may be considered invalid or unacceptable for any of the following reasons: (1) Failure to do any of the following: (A) Follow the approved protocol and adhere to any procedure or requirement of the approved method or other protocol conditions

a pproved or required by the department. (B) Demonstrate or comply with reference methods' quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) requirements. (C) Provide or report the required data in order for the department to complete the review of the test cond itions, specifications, and results. (2) Use of nonrepresentative process or operating conditions or control device operation. (3) Observation of fugitive emissions fr om the emissions unit or associated capture or control system being tested by the departm ent or authorized representative. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3

- 6

- 6)

SECTION 18 17 . 326 IAC 3-7-1 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-7-1 ApplicabilityPrc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

37 

### Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4- 3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 1. This rule applies to fuel sampling and analysis that is performed to determine compliance with the emission li mitations specified in 326 IAC 7. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-7-1; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2075; read opted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477)

SECTION 19 18 . 326 IAC 3-7-2 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-7-2 Coal sampling and analysis methods Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4- 3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 2. (a) Owners or operators of coal sa mpling systems for sources with total coalfired capacity greater than or equal to one thousand five hundred (1,500) million British thermal units (Btus) (Btu) per hour actual heat input shall follow procedures specified in ASTM D2234-89*, "Standard Methods for Collec tion of a Gross Sample of Coal", unless otherwise provided in section 3 of this rule . Additionally, the coal sampling system shall meet the following requirements: (1) The coal sample acquisition point shal l be at a location where representative samples of the total coal flow to be combusted by the facility orfacilities emissions unit may be obtained. A sing le as-bunkered sampling st ation may be used to represent the coal to be co mbusted by multiple facilities emissions units using the same stockpile feed system. (2) The increment collection method to be used is specified in ASTM D2234-89*, Table 1, I-A-1, I-B-1, or I-C-1. (3) The opening of the sampling device shall be at least two and one-half (2.5) times the top-size of the coal and not less than one and one-fourth (1.25) inches. (4) The sampling device shall have sufficient capacity to completely retain or entirely pass the increment without loss or spillage. (5) The velocity with which the cross-stre am cutting instrument travels through the stream shall not exceed eighteen (18) in ches per second. The velocity requirement shall not apply to a swing-arm sampler or to a sampler w hose cutter opening is perpendicular to the stream of coal. Owners or operators of all coal sampling systems shall detail the proper operating procedures in the standard operating procedures document required under section 5 of this rule. (6) Increments obtained during the sampli ng period shall be protected from changes in composition to maintain the integrity of constituent characteristics required to convert sample sulfur content to units of the applicable emission standard. (7) A comparison of weight or volume of collected sample with that of the total flow of coal shall be conducted at a minimu m of one (1) time ever y two (2) weeks to assure a constant sampling ratio is main tained for increments composited into a sample representing a single tw enty-four (24) hour period. (8) A routine inspection of the sampling system shall be established to meet requirements and guidelines specified in ASTM D4702-87*, "Guide for InspectingPrc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

38 

### Mechanical Coal Sampling Systems that Use Cross-Cut Sample Cutters for Conformance with Current ASTM Methods". (9) Composite samples shall be collected fo r analysis at a minimum of one (1) time per twenty-four ( 24) hour period.

(b) Owners or operators of coal sampling systems for sour ces with total coal-fired capacity between one hundred (100) and one thousand five hundred (1,500) million Btus Btu per hour actual heat input shall comply with requirements: specified as follows: (1) in subsection (a); (2) in section 3 of this rule; or (3) shall meet the following minimum requirements: (A) The coal sample acquisition poi nt shall be at a location where representative samples of the total coal flow to be combusted by the facility or facilities emissions unit may be obtained. A single as-bunkered or as-burned sampling station may be used to repr esent the coal to be combusted by multiple facilities emissions units using the same stockpile feed system. (B) Coal shall be sampled at least thr ee (3) times per day and at least one (1) time per eight (8) hour period unless no co al is bunkered dur ing the preceding eight (8) hour period. (C) Minimum sample size shall be five hundred (500) grams. (D) Samples shall be composited and an alyzed at the en d of each calendar month.

(c) Coal samples shall be prepared for analysis in accordance with procedures specified in ASTM D2013-86*, "S tandard Method of Preparing Co al Samples for Analysis". The preparation of samples shall meet the following requirements: (1) Samples shall be prepared in accordance with ASTM D2013-86*, Procedure A or Procedure B. (2) Sample preparation shall be checked at weekly intervals by performing a split sample of the twenty-four (24) hour com posite sample and preparing and analyzing these two (2) identically.

(d) The heat content of coal samples sh all be determined in accordance with procedures specified in ASTM D2015-95*, "Sta ndard Test Method for Gross Calorific Value of Solid Fuel by the Adiabatic Bomb Calorimeter", or ASTM D3286-91A*, "Standard Test Method for Gross Calorific Value of Coal a nd Coke by the Isothermal Jacket Bomb Calorimeter". Restandardization requirement s in Section 11 of both methods shall be followed. Precision requirements for repeatability shall be verified according to Section 16.1.1 of both methods at a mi nimum of once per week.

(e) The sulfur content of coal samples shall be determined according to procedures specified in ASTM D3177-89*, "Standard Test Me thods for Total Sulfur in the Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke", or ASTM D4239-94*, "Standard Test Methods for Sulfur in the Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke Usi ng High Temperature Tube Furnace Combustion Methods". Precision requirements for repeatabili ty shall be verified according to ASTM D3177-89*, Section 13, or ASTM D4239-94, Section 18*, at a minimum of one (1) time perPrc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

39 

### week. The laboratory that performs the analysis shall participate in an interlaboratory audit program using coal samples supplied by the department.

(f) Compliance with this section is required unless a source owner or operator demonstrates to The department that may approve minor modifications to the coal sampling and analysis procedures at a source upon demonstration by the source owner or operator that the minor modifications are necessary to meet the re quirements of this section.

*These documents are incorporated by refe rence. Copies are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Envir onmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Fl oor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-7-2; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2075; readopted filed J an 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 38)

SECTION 20 19 . 326 IAC 3-7-3 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-7-3 Alternative coal sampling and analysis methods Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4- 3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 3. (a) As an alternative to the coal sampling and analysis pr ocedures in section 2 of this rule, a source owner or operator may use manual or other non-ASTM automatic sampling and analysis procedures upon a demonstration as described in subsection (b), submitted to and approved by the department for approval, and U.S. EPA that such the procedures provide sulfur dioxid e emission estimates representative either of estimates based on coal sampling and analysis procedures specifie d in section 2 of this rule or of continuous emissions monitoring. The demonstration shall consistof one (1) ormore of the following methods:

(1) (b) For the demonstration described in this section, a source owner or operator may submit documentation of procedures and re sults of a stopped-belt bias test or other comparisons between a sampling system meeting the requirements of section 2 of this rule and those methods and procedures proposed by th e source owner or operator. A stopped-belt bias test and a sampling system meeting the requirements of sec tion 2 of this rule shall be considered reference method systems. A comparis on shall utilize a series of at least twentyfive (25) reference method system samples pa ired with nonreference method system samples and analyzed for the percent of sulfur cont ent to determine the presence of significant systemic error. The detection of significant systemic error shall be based on the application of a statistical test (t-test) to determine if there is a difference between the reference and nonreference systems at the ninety-five per cent (95%) confidence level, according to the following formula:

Where: t = Calculated t value.Prc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

40 

### d = Average difference between paired data.
Sd = Standard deviation of the differences. N = Number of paired data sets. The calculated t value is compared to the t valu e in the standard statis tical t tables at the ninety-five percent (95%) probab ility and the appropriate degrees of freedom (n - 1). If the calculated t value is greater than or equal to the value of t in the t table, then the systems are not comparable. Certain coals with low variab ility may detect a small bias, which may be acceptable as decided on a case-by-case basis. This method tests for positive and negative bias. Provisions for testing only for a ne gative bias that would cause a source owner or operator to report less than actual values may be acceptable if supported by statistical tests. Upon request, the department shall provide written guidance to a source ow ner or operator as to the procedures to be followed in conducting this comparison. (2) Other procedures may be acceptable if submitted to the department for approval and the department approves.

( b) (c) The demonstration provided described in subsection (a) this section shall be repeated upon any significant change to the coal sampling procedures or upon notification by the department that a new demonstration is ne cessary. If the departme nt has reason to doubt that the alternative sampling and analysis procedures are comparable to methods and procedures provided in secti on 2 of this rule, based on: (1) inspections; (2) monitoring; (3) quality assurance data; or (4) other information; the department may notify the owner or operato r that the demonstration shall be repeated. Written notification by the department of the re quest shall be made to the source owner or operator allowing at least sixty (60) days to sc hedule the demonstration. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-7-3; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2077; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477)

SECTION 21 20 . 326 IAC 3-7-4 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-7-4 Fuel oil sampling; analysis methods Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4- 3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17 Sec. 4. (a) The source owner or op erator shall perform sampling and analysis of the sulfur content of fuel oil shall be performed in accordance with the following ASTM procedures: (1) Collection of fuel oil samples shall be conducted according to either of the following: (A) ASTM D4057-88*, "Standard Practice for Manual Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum Products". (B) ASTM D4177-82*, "Standard Method for Automatic Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum Products". (2) Determination of sulfur content sh all be conducted according to any of the following:Prc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

41 

### (A) ASTM D129-95*, "Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Products (General Bomb Method)". (B) ASTM D1266-91*, "Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Products (Lamp Method)". (C) ASTM D1552-95*, "Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Products (High-Temperature Method)". (D) ASTM D2622-94*, "Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Products (X-Ray Spectrographic Method)". (3) Determination of heat content shall be conducted according to ASTM D240-92*, "Standard Test Method for Heat of Co mbustion of Liquid Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb Calorimeter".

(b) An A source owner or operator may, with the prior written approval of the department and U.S. EPA, modify the procedures specified in subsection (a), use alternate equivalent procedures, or rely upon equivalent sampling and an alysis procedures performed by the vendor prior to delivery of the fuel oil to the ow ner or operator.

*These documents are incorporated by refe rence. Copies are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Envir onmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Fl oor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-7-4; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2077; readopted filed J an 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 40)

SECTION 22 21 . 326 IAC 3-7-5 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3-7-5 Record keeping requiremen ts; standard operating procedures Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-4- 3; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 5. (a) Owners or operators of sources w ith total coal-fired capacity greater than or equal to one hundred (100) million British ther mal units per hour actual heat input shall develop a standard operating proced ure (SOP) to be followed for: (1) sampling; (2) handling; (3) analysis; (4) quality control; (5) quality assurance; and (6) data reporting of the information collected pursuant to under sections 2 through 4 of this rule. In addition, any revision to the SOP shall be submitted to maintained by the source and made available upon request by the department.

(b) Owner or operators of emissions uni ts using CEMS for compliance that do not use coal sampling and analys is as a backup when the CEM CEMS is not in use do not need to have a SOP.Prc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

42 

### (b) (c) The owner or operator of a source or emissions unit subject to this ruleshall maintain records sufficient to verify compliance with the procedures specified in sections 2 through 4 of this rule. Records shall be: (1) maintained for a period of five (5) years; and shall be (2) made available upon request by the department. The department may at any time perform a syst ems audit to determine compliance with the requirements in sections 2 through 4 of this ru le. Audit procedures shall be submitted to the owner or operator of a fuel sampling and analys is system subject to audit prior to conducting such the audit. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3-7-5; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2078; readopted filed J an 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477)

SECTION 23 22 . 326 IAC 7-2-1 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 7-2-1 Reporting requirements; methods to determine compliance Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11 Affected: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 1. (a) As used in this article, "weighting factor" mean s the daily quantity of coal bunkered or megawatt generation or other approp riate measure of the output of a combustion

source.

(b) As used in this article, "rolling we ighted average sulfur dioxide emission rate" means the summation of the average sulfur diox ide emission rate times the daily weighting factor divided by the summation of the weight ing factors.

(c) Owners or operators of sources or emissions units subject to 326 IAC 7-1.1, 326 IAC 7-4, or 326 IAC 7-4.1 shall submit to the commissioner the following reports based on fuel sampling and analysis data obtained in accordance with procedures specified under 326 IAC 3-7: (1) Fuel combustion sources with total coal-f ired heat input capac ity greater than or equal to one thousand five hundred (1,500) million British thermal units (MMBtu) per hour shall submit quarterly reports of the thirty (30) day rolling weighted average sulfur dioxide emission rate in pounds per MMBtu. Records of the daily average coal sulfur content, coal heat content, weigh ting factor, and daily average sulfur dioxide emission rate in pounds per MMBtu shall be submitted to the department in the quarterly report and maintained by the sour ce owner or operator for a period of at least two (2) years. (2) Fuel combustion sources with total coal-f ired heat input capacity greater than one hundred (100) and less than one thousand fi ve hundred (1,500) MMBtu per hour shall submit quarterly reports of the calendar month average coal sulfur content, coal heat content, and sulfur dioxide emission rate in pounds per MMBtu and the total monthly coal consumption. (3) All other fuel combustion sources sha ll submit reports of calendar month average sulfur content, heat content, fuel consum ption, and sulfur dioxide emission rate in pounds per MMBtu upon request.Prc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

43 

### (d) Compliance or noncompliance with the emission limitations contained in 326 IAC 7

- 1.1, 326 IAC 7

- 4, or326 IAC 7

- 4.1 may be determined by a stack testconducted in accordance with 326 IAC 3

- 6 utilizing procedures outlined in 40 CFR 60, App endix A, Method 6*, 6A*, 6C*, or8*.

(e) (d) Fuel sampling and analysis data shall be collected pursuant to the procedures specified in 326 IAC 3-7-2 or 326 IAC 3-7-3 fo r coal combustion or 326 IAC 3-7-4 for oil combustion. and these datamay be used to determine compliance ornoncompliance with the emission limitations contained in 326 IAC 7

- 1.1, 326 IAC 7

- 4, or326 IAC 7

- 4.1. Computation of calculated sulfur dioxide emission rates from fuel sampling and analysis data shall be based on the emission factors cont ained in U.S. EPA publication AP-42* unless other emission factors based on site-specific su lfur dioxide measuremen ts are approved by the commissioner and the U.S. EPA. Fuel sampling and analysis data shall be collected as follows: (1) For coal-fired fuel combustion sources with heat input capacity greater than or equal to one thousand five hundred (1,500) MMBtu per hour, compliance or noncompliance shall be determined using a thirty (30) day rolling weighted average sulfur dioxide emission rate in pounds per MMBtu unless a shorter averaging time or alternate averaging methodology is specifi ed for a source und er this article. (2) For all other combustion sources, compliance ornoncompliance shall be determined using a calendar month average sulfur dioxide emission rate in pounds per MMBtu unless a shorter averaging time or alternate averaging methodology is specified for a source under this article.

(f) A determination of noncompliance under either the method specified in subsection (d) or(e) shall not be refuted by evidence of compliance under the other method.

(g) Upon written notification of an emissions unitowneror operatorto the department, (e) Subsection (c) does not apply when continuous emission monitoring data collected and reporte d under 326 IAC 3-5 may be is used as the means for determining compliance with the emission limitations in this article. Upon such notification, the other requirements of this rule shall not apply.

(f) Compliance or noncompliance with the emission limitations contained in 326 IAC 7-1.1 or 326 IAC 7-4 may be determined by an appropriate method as follows: (1) A stack test conducted in accordan ce with 326 IAC 3-6 using procedures in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6*, 6A*, 6C*, or 8*. (2) A continuous emission monitoring system in accordance with 326 IAC 3-5. (3) Source sampling in accordance with 326 IAC 3-6. (4) Fuel sampling and analysis data coll ected in accordance with subsection (d) or 326 IAC 3-7. (5) Other methods approved by the commissioner and U.S. EPA.

*These documents are incorporated by re ference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Cap itol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or arePrc #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

44 

### available for review and copyi ng at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 7-2-1; filed Aug 28, 1990, 4:50 p.m.: 14 IR 52; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2078; errata filed Feb 9, 1999, 4:06 p.m.: 22 IR 2006; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477; errata filed Nov 7, 2001, 3:00 p.m.: 25 IR 813; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:30 p.m.: 26 IR 1565; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 42; filed May 25, 2005, 10:50 a.m.: 28 IR 2953)

# A PPENDIX 

# GTITLE 326 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

Proposed Rule LSA Document #05-330

DIGEST

Amends 326 IAC 3- 4- 1

, 326 IAC 3- 4- 2

, 326 IAC 3- 4- 3

, 326 IAC 3- 5- 1

, 326 IAC 3- 5- 2

, 326 IAC 3- 5- 3

, 326 IAC 3- 5- 4

, 326 IAC 3- 5- 5

, 326 IAC 3- 5- 6

, 326 IAC 3- 5- 7

, 326 IAC 3- 5- 8

, 326 IAC 3- 6- 1

, 326 IAC 3- 6- 2

, 326 IAC 3- 6- 3

, 326 IAC 3- 6- 4

, 326 IAC 3- 6- 5

, 326 IAC 3- 6- 6

, 326 IAC 3- 7- 1

, 326 IAC 3- 7- 2

, 326 IAC 3- 7- 3

, 326 IAC 3- 7- 4 , and 326 IAC 3- 7- 5 concerning compliance monitoring. Amends 326 IAC 7- 2- 1 concerning sulfur dioxide compliance requirements. Effective 30 days after filing with the Publisher.

HISTORY First Notice of Comment Period: December 1, 2005, Indiana Register (29 IR 899). Second Notice of Comment Period: March 31, 2010, Indiana Register (DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA ). Notice of First Hearing: March 31, 2010, Indiana Register (DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330PHA ). Continuation of Second Notice of Comment Period: May 12, 2010, Indiana Register (DIN: 20100512-IR-326050330SCA ). Change in Notice of First Hearing: August 4, 2010, Indiana Register (DIN: 20100804-IR-326050330CHA ). Change in Notice of First Hearing: October 20, 2010, Indiana Register (DIN: 20101020-IR-326050330CHA ). Date of First Hearing: December 1, 2010.

PUBLIC COMMENTS UNDER IC 13- 14- 9- 4.5 IC 13- 14- 9- 4.5 states that a board may not adopt a rule under IC 13- 14- 9 that is substantively different from the draft rule published under IC 13- 14- 9- 4 until the board has conducted a third comment period that is at least 21 days long.

REQUEST FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS This proposed (preliminarily adopted) rule is substantively different from the draft rule published on March 31, 2010 at DIN: 20100331-IR-326050330SNA . The Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) is requesting comment on the entire proposed (preliminarily adopted) rule. The proposed rule contains numerous changes from the draft rule that make the proposed rule so substantively different from the draft rule that public comment on the entire proposed rule is advisable. This notice requests the submission of comments on the entire proposed rule, including suggestions for specific amendments. These comments and the department=s responses thereto will be presented to the board for its consideration at final adoption under IC 13- 14- 9- 6 . Mailed comments should be addressed to: #05-330 (APCB) Compliance Monitoring Susan Bem Mail Code 61-50 Rule and SIP Development Section Office of Air Quality Indiana Department of Environmental Management 100 North Senate Avenue Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 Hand delivered comments will be accepted by the receptionist on duty at the tenth floor reception desk, Office of Air Quality, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana. Comments may be submitted by facsimile at the IDEM fax number: (317) 233-5967, Monday through Friday, between 8:15 a.m. and 4:45 p.m. Please confirm the timely receipt of faxed comments by calling the Rule and State Implementation Plan Development Section at (317) 234-6530.

COMMENT PERIOD DEADLINE Comments must be postmarked, faxed, or hand delivered by February 9, 2011.

SUMMARY/RESPONSE TO COMMENTS FROM THE SECOND COMMENT PERIOD IDEM requested public comment from March 31, 2010, through June 11, 2010, on IDEM's draft rule language. IDEM received comments from the following parties: Eli Lilly and Company (ELC) Bingham McHale (CASE Coalition) (BM) Indiana Energy Association/Indiana Utility Group (IUG) Indianapolis Power and Light Company (IPL) Barnes and Thornburg on behalf of Indianapolis Power and Light Company (BT) Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 1Alcoa Inc./Alcoa Power Generating Inc. (Alcoa)

Indiana Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Indiana Manufacturers Association, Inc. (IMA) Following is a summary of the comments received and IDEM's responses thereto: Comment: The commenter supports the comments filed by the Indiana Manufacturers Association and the Indiana Energy Association. (ICC) Response: IDEM acknowledges the support. Comment: The long delay in the rulemaking schedule between the First Notice of Comment Period and the Second Notice of Comment Period sets a bad precedent and suggests that IDEM and stakeholders, including potentially affected sources, may be better served by starting a new rulemaking process given that personnel (both at IDEM and within the stakeholder community) and driving regulatory issues have changed during that time. (ICC) Comment: While IDEM is under no statutory time frame in which a proposed rule may be subject to the promulgation process, the commenter does not understand the wisdom in not beginning the process anew given the 51 month delay. (IUG) Response: IDEM believes that starting this rulemaking over would only delay the rulemaking longer. The Second Notice of Comment Period is still early in the rulemaking schedule to allow enough time for public input. The Second Notice of Comment Period, which was published earlier this year, is the first time the public has an opportunity to review draft rule language. Comment: If IDEM elects to move forward with this rulemaking, IDEM should convene a workgroup comprised of interested stakeholders to lay out the proposed rule and seek input on the many complicated sections of the proposal. (ICC) Comment: It would be helpful to review the minutes derived from a stakeholder meeting held on March 15, 2007, to ensure that the discussions from that meeting are captured in the context of this rulemaking. There is a lack of information regarding why the changes in this rulemaking are necessary. (IUG) Response: IDEM held an interested parties meeting on September 8, 2010, to discuss this rulemaking. Minutes from the March 15, 2007 meeting are not available. These changes are necessary for state implementation plan (SIP) approvability and to clarify/update the compliance monitoring rules. Comment: The commenter appreciates that IDEM extended the Second Notice of Comment Period so that others can comment in a more detailed manner. (IMA) Response: IDEM appreciates the support for an extension of comment period. Comment: Consistency with federal compliance monitoring rules is of the utmost importance. Instances where an IDEM provision could overlap with a federal provision requiring a more stringent result should be eliminated unless a specific situation exists to warrant the deviation. (IMA) Comment: Being regulated by conflicting federal and state standards is not only confusing but is costs Indiana facilities additional money to ensure and report compliance with both standards. Compelling reasons must exist for varying from the federal standards. (BM) Comment: IDEM should take the opportunity afforded by opening up the compliance monitoring rules to ensure that the Indiana rules are consistent with federal compliance monitoring rules, in particular the monitoring rules found in federal NSPS and NESHAP rules. (ELC) Response: IDEM discussed this issue with interested parties at the September 8, 2010 meeting. IDEM understands the frustration with overlapping requirements, but in some instances this is necessary. IDEM has reviewed overlapping requirements and has addressed as appropriate in each of the specific comments made on this issue. Comment: Two of the three primary purposes IDEM identified with this rulemaking are (1) changes that U.S. EPA requested and (2) to allow the use of PM CEMS in lieu of COMs. Changes should be limited to only those two and that the other changes should be addressed in a different rulemaking. In addition, it is not clear whether other changes were discussed in the First Notice of Comment Period. (IPL) (BT) (IUG) Response: The changes that IDEM is proposing update and clarify compliance monitoring requirements in 326 IAC 3 and 326 IAC 7- 2- 1 , which are all within the scope of this rulemaking. Comment: In many instances IDEM is proposing to add the term "sources and emissions units." In some instances, this is improper. For example, in many instances, IDEM changes rules that apply to "facilities" and substitutes "sources and emissions units." Not all emissions units at a source may be subject to 326 IAC 3 . (IPL) (BT) (IUG) Response: IDEM agrees that not all emissions units at a source may be subject to 326 IAC 3 . The only instances IDEM inserted "sources and emissions unit" is in 326 IAC 3- 5- 1 and 326 IAC 3- 5- 3 . In most instances IDEM inserted "sources or emission units" in the draft rule language. IDEM has deleted 326 IAC 3- 5- 1 (a) of the current rule language in the rule for preliminary adoption because the introductory language is not necessary as discussed in a subsequent comment. IDEM has revised the language at the new 326 IAC 3- 5- 1 (a) and (b) in the rule for preliminary adoption to say "sources or emissions units". IDEM feels it is appropriate to include both term, "sources" and "emissions units", in this section because some of the thresholds for applicability are based on Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 2emissions units and others are based on plant production, for example, sulfuric acid plants. IDEM made changes

throughout the draft rule for preliminary adoption to make it clear that requirements for affected emissions units do not necessarily apply to other emission units at the source. Some "source or emissions units" were left as is because it did not appear to change the meaning. Comment: Why are definitions from the federal Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) rules set out at 40 CFR 64 that are incorporated by reference at 326 IAC 3- 8- 1 , being added? (IUG) Response: Not all sources subject to Article 3 are CAM sources. These terms are used in Article 3 and were not previously defined. IDEM is proposing to delete the definition of "potential to emit" in the draft rule language for preliminary adoption because this CAM definition is not needed. While this term is referenced in the applicability of NO

x sources in Clark and Floyd counties applicability is ultimately determined by applicability language in Article 10. Comment: IDEM should rely on existing definitions already provided in 326 IAC wherever possible and not create separate definitions in Article 3. (IUG) Response: IDEM agrees and has deleted the definition of "major source", "owner or operator", "control device", and "inherent process equipment" in the draft rule for preliminary adoption. IDEM did not delete the definition for "emissions unit", but instead referenced the definition already included in Article 1 because it is defined in both Article 1 and Article 2-7. The definition of "permit" was revised to refer to 326 IAC 2 instead of referring to individual rules. Comment: Delete the phrase "as specified by the U.S. EPA pursuant to regulations under Section 412 of the Clean Air Act" in the definition of "Continuous emissions monitoring system" in 326 IAC 3- 4- 1 . Section 412 of the Clean Air Act addresses the Acid Rain program and having this language is confusing, because it appears to limit the definition of CEMS only to those units that are regulated under the Acid Rain provisions. That does not appear to be the intent of the agency when drafting this definition. (ELC) Response: IDEM agrees and has deleted the phrase in the draft rule for preliminary adoption. Comment: The proposed definition for "boiler operating day" in the draft rule language at 326 IAC 3- 4- 1 (1) should be "the twenty-four (24) hour period", not "a twenty-four (24) hour period", and "during" should be added to "combusted during the entire twenty-four (24) hour period." (BM) Comment: The proposed definition for "boiler operating day" in the draft rule language at 326 IAC 3- 4- 1 (1) conflicts with the calculation provided for in the state implementation plan (SIP) for SO 2 and NO

x . It appears the only reference to "boiler operating day" in Article 3 is the proposed language at 326 IAC 3- 5- 1 (c)(iv)(AA). (IUG) Response: The term "boiler operating day" is not needed in the proposed language for PM CEMS at 326 IAC 3- 4- 1 (1). The definition and use in 326 IAC 3- 4- 1 (1) has been deleted in the draft rule for preliminary adoption. Comment: While the definition of "control device" in 40 CFR Part 64 includes acid plants and sulfur recovery plants, inclusion of the same in definition of "control device" in 326 IAC 3- 4- 1 does not appear to be necessary or relevant. (BM) Response: The definition of "control device" was deleted in the draft rule for preliminary adoption to address the concern expressed in a previous comment to rely on existing definitions already provided in 326 IAC wherever possible. Comment: The definition of "emission limitation or standard" proposed in 326 IAC 3- 4- 1 (8)(A) differs from the definition found in 40 CFR Part 64. It expands the definition to applicable requirements other than those listed in subsection (A)(i) through (A)(iii) of the draft rule by including the phrase "including the following." Additionally, the proposed definition omits examples of general operational requirements that are exempted from the definition. Moreover, the draft rule at 326 IAC 3- 4- 1 (8) confusingly states "as defined under the CAA" and should be rephrased as "contained in this title." Lastly, 326 IAC 3- 4- 1 (8)(B) omits that an emission limitation or standard may be expressed as a work practice, process, or control device parameter. (BM) Response: IDEM has deleted the phrase "including the following" from the proposed language for preliminary adoption. IDEM did not include the example of operational requirements in 326 IAC 3- 4- 1 (6)(C) (updated citation in the proposed language for preliminary adoption) because IDEM does not typically list examples in rule language. While IDEM agrees the use of the word "defined" could be confusing, since this is in reference to limitations and standards established or regulated in the CAA, IDEM has kept the use of the word "defined" to be consistent with the CAM definition. IDEM believes that the suggestion to say "in this title" is inappropriate given that there may be provisions in the CAA that are not contained in Title 326. IDEM has reworked 326 IAC 3- 4- 1 (6)(B) to be consistent with the language in 40 CFR 64. Comment: Clarify the proposed definition of "exceedance" in 326 IAC 3- 4- 1 (11)(B) by inserting "contained in this title" after "applicable emission limitation or standard." (BM) Response: The definition does not need to be amended because the definition of "applicable emission limitation or standard" already includes similar language. Comment: The proposed definition of "owner or operator" is consistent with the definition provided in 326 IAC 1- 2- 51 and may be important for purposes of liability and responsible party references in Indiana and federal law and regulations. However, the term and definition, as utilized throughout this article are not consistent with common everyday practices. Contractors are utilized and responsible for many functions throughout this article. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 3As currently presented, contractors could not perform those functions. Further, the current proposal may be

contrary to accreditation requirements for certain contractor testing as provided in 40 CFR Part 75. Amend definition to include "lawful designee." (IUG) Response: IDEM is deleting the definition of "owner or operator" in the draft rule for preliminary adoption as it is defined in Article 1 and it is not necessary to have a different meaning in 326 IAC 3 . IDEM believes responsibility for compliance is on the owner or operator of the source, not person hired to do the monitoring. U.S. EPA has added "contractor" provisions to federal rules, but only on case by case basis. Comment: The definition for "unit operating hour" should include the word "any" instead of "all", to read ". . .while any associated emission units are combusting fuel." (IUG) Response: IDEM has amended the definition in draft rule for preliminary adoption as suggested. Comment: Consistent with the definition section and other references throughout the proposed rule, change the word "limit" to "limitation" in 326 IAC 3- 4- 1 (15)(A)(iii) and the change the last phrase of 326 IAC 3- 4- 1 (15)(C)(viii) to "with an emission limitation or standard". (BM) Response: IDEM has amended the definition for "monitoring" in draft rule for preliminary adoption as suggested. Comment: 326 IAC 3- 5- 1 generally sets forth requirements to properly calibrate, test, and report data from COMS and CEMS. It is a collection of existing substantive requirements, but does not appear to establish new substantive requirements, as stated in 326 IAC 3- 5- 1 (a)(1). The rule does not establish a "process for developing suitable continuous monitoring requirements," as stated in 326 IAC 3- 5- 1 (a)(2). The introductory text in unnecessary and 326 IAC 5- 5- 1 (a) should be deleted. (IPL) (BT) Response: IDEM agrees and has deleted subsection (a) in the current 326 IAC 3- 5- 1 and relettered the remaining subsections in the draft rule for preliminary adoption. Comment: 326 IAC 3- 5- 1 (b)(2) through (8) each should include "to the extent to determine compliance with an emission limitation or standard contained in this title." (BM) Response: IDEM added "to determine compliance with an emission limitation or standard" in the lead-in paragraph for this subsection in the draft for preliminary adoption to address this comment. 40 CFR 51, Appendix P, allows states to exempt emissions units not subject to an applicable emission standard of an approved SIP. Comment: Replace " 326 IAC 2- 1 " with " 326 IAC 2- 1.1 " in 326 IAC 3- 5- 1 (d). (BM) Response: IDEM agrees and has made the replacement in draft rule for preliminary adoption as suggested. Comment: Delete the word "of" in the second sentence of 326 IAC 3- 5- 2 (5), just prior to "40 CFR 60." (BM) Response: IDEM has deleted "of" in draft rule for preliminary adoption. Comment: The commenter has concerns with the language provided at 326 IAC 3- 5- 4 , standard operating procedures. The requirement that the SOP manual include daily operation ((c)(7)(A)) and preventive maintenance and corrective maintenance ((c)(9)) procedures is too broad considering the numerous scenarios that could be included. Instead these procedures should be maintained on site or stored at a central location and made available to the department upon request by the department. This would also eliminate burdensome updates to the SOP manual every time a tweak to a procedure or frequency of an action is made. Also, the requirement ((c)(10) regarding the listing of spare parts should be deleted. U.S. EPA removed this requirement from federal 40 CFR Part 75 rules (May 26, 1999, 64 FR 28564) (IUG) Response: IDEM does not consider this too burdensome since updates are submitted to IDEM within two years of the revisions. Until that time the updated procedures can be maintained onsite. IDEM does look at the spare parts list and wants to know if source is taking too long getting a part or if it is a part the source would not be expected to be kept available. The state rule only requires sources to keep a listing of the manufacturer's recommended spare parts inventory. The changes at the federal level for Part 75 sources removed the requirement to maintain an inventory of spare parts. Comment: How are/will conflicts between quality assurance requirements under a NSPS or NESHAP and 326 IAC 3- 5- 5 be resolved? (BM) Comment: Amend 326 IAC 3- 5- 5 (a) as follows: Sec. 5. (a) Except where specific provisions in 40 CFR 60*, 40 CFR 61*, 40 CFR 63* or 40 CFR 75* are is applicable for affected facilities sources or emissions units under the acid rain program, quality assurance requirements specified in this section and 40 CFR 60*, Appendix F, apply to continuous emission monitors that monitor the following: The proposed amendment will ensure that where a federal regulatory requirement varies from 40 CFR 60, Appendix F, that requirement will still remain as the applicable QA/QC provisions for the emission unit. (ELC) Response: In general, emissions units would be subject to requirements in both rules. IDEM is proposing in the draft rule for preliminary adoption to delete emissions units subject to 40 CFR 61 and 40 CFR 63 from the applicability provisions in 326 IAC 3- 5- 1 and therefore NESHAP sources would not be subject to 326 IAC 3- 5- 5 eliminating this issue for NESHAP sources, unless the emissions unit was brought into 326 IAC 3- 5 because of another applicability provision. For NSPS sources, there is more of a consistency between 40 CFR Part 60 and it is less of an issue. Comment: To address different terminology used in 326 IAC 3- 5- 5 (a) and 40 CFR Part 75 the text at 326 IAC Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 43- 5- 5 (a) should be revised as follows:

"Except for "affected units" under Part 75 that are also "emissions units" subject to this rule, quality assurance requirements specified in this section and 40 CFR 60, Appendix F, apply to continuous emission monitors that monitor the following:" 326 IAC 3- 5- 5 (b) should read as follows: "Emission units that are also subject to 40 CFR Part 75 shall follow the quality assurance procedures of 40 CFR 75 and report the results in accordance with subsection (f)." Also, all units subject to Part 75 QA requirements should use Part 75 QA procedures. There is no basis to only extend Part 75 requirements only to "peaking units."(IPL) (BT) Response: IDEM has revised 326 IAC 3- 5- 5 (a) and 326 IAC 3- 5- 5 (b) as suggested. IDEM added "peaking units" to address the fact that many of the turbines/peaking units went ahead and installed CEMS because IDEM had asked for NO

x and CO CEMS for PSD purposes. Since "peakers" do not operate all the time this was causing a problem because our rules do not allow for extending the requirement to conduct annual RATAs. Therefore "peakers" were constantly running into conflict with the requirement to do a RATA during times when they were not operating. This was meant specifically for "peakers" and was not intended to address units that are in constant operation. Comment: 326 IAC 3- 5- 5 (f) requires certain audits to be conducted with RATAs submitted to the department within 30 days of the end of each quarter. Common practice has been to submit the report within 45 days after the completion of the test, which is also IDEM's preference. Clarity on the timing for filing these reports needs to be provided. (IUG) Response: Yes, 45 days has been common practice and IDEM prefers this time frame for RATAs as this is the time frame for submitting performance test data. Comment: How are/will conflicts between the averaging periods required in 326 IAC 3- 5- 7 (b)(3) and those contained in individual NSPS or NESHAP be resolved? (BM) Comment: The reporting requirements found in 326 IAC 3- 5- 7 provide a clear example of where the Indiana rules create confusion and potential conflict with federal regulatory requirements. 326 IAC 3- 5- 7 (b)(3) specifies that gaseous excess emissions data reports shall be reported using three hour block periods ending at 03:00 and every three hour block thereafter. This subsection ends with the phrase regarding data reports for sources or emissions units subject to hourly, daily or other averaging time periods, a phrase which doesn't very clearly state what information is required. This language is very confusing, and could be read to require a source to report emissions data in both 3-hour blocks and another applicable reporting period, such as a 24-hour block, because of the nature of the applicable emission limit. If a source operated a total hydrocarbon (THC) CEMS because of MACT standard that was a 24-hour limit, there is no reason the source should have to report the data in 3-hour blocks. Because the last sentence in the subsection is limited only to 1-hour, daily/24-hour, and 30-day averaging periods, it also provides no guidance in the circumstances where a standard may expressed in a different averaging period. In addition, this language is inconsistent with similar language in what is proposed to be 326 IAC 3- 5- 7 (c)(3). The confusion and potential conflict in this provision could be resolved by deleting 326 IAC 3- 5- 7 (b)(3) in its entirety. The language in what is proposed to be 326 IAC 3- 5- 7 (c) adequately describes the requirements. (ELC) Comment: The current language at 326 IAC 3- 5- 7 (b)(3) appears to require the reporting of 3 hour block averages regardless of the averaging time of the applicable emissions limitation. The language should be clarified to require that sources report the gaseous emissions data which is consistent with the applicable standard as follows: "(3) Gaseous excess emissions data reports shall include the emissions data for each averaging period in the reporting period. The averaging period shall be consistent with the applicable emissions limitation. Gaseous excess emissions data shall be reported with the quarterly report required in this section." (IUG) Response: In general, emissions units would be subject to requirements in both rules. IDEM has amended 326 IAC 3- 5- 7 (b)(3) in the draft rule for preliminary adoption to say that the three hour block average does not apply if the owner or operator must demonstrate compliance with a different averaging period as specified by an applicable rule or permit condition. IDEM is also proposing that emissions units that were only subject to 326 IAC 3- 5 because of NESHAP applicability will no longer be subject to 326 IAC 3- 5 thus removing the requirement for quarterly reports for excess emissions under 326 IAC 3- 5- 7 allowing for NESHAP emission units to follow the schedule in the applicable NESHAP and Title V. IDEM plans to submit this rulemaking to U.S. EPA for SIP approval and will continue to discuss this rulemaking with U.S. EPA as it is reviewed for federal approval. Comment: Amend the reporting requirements at 326 IAC 3- 5- 7 (c)(4) to indicate that daily zero and span calibration checks should be kept on site as indicated in the record keeping requirements of 326 IAC 3- 5- 6 . (IUG) Response: IDEM deleted the phrase "which shall be reported separately" at 326 IAC 3- 5- 7 (c)(4) in the proposed rule for preliminary adoption to address the conflicting language. Comment: The record keeping requirements of 326 IAC 3- 5- 7 (d)(2) are duplicative of 326 IAC 3- 5- 6 (a)(6). Delete 326 IAC 3- 5- 7 (d)(2) and merge the remainder of this rule into one paragraph under 326 IAC 3- 5- 7 (d). (BM) Response: IDEM agrees and has deleted 326 IAC 3- 5- 7 (d)(2) in the draft rule for preliminary adoption as Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 5suggested.

Comment: The plain language of 326 IAC 3- 5- 8 (c) requires that the CEMS and COMS be in continuous operation regardless of operational status of the equipment being monitored. IDEM should amend 326 IAC 3- 5- 8 (c) to the following: "(c) CEMS and COMS shall be in continuous operation during periods of emission unit operation except for CEM/COM malfunctions, repairs, calibration checks, and zero and span adjustments and other required QA/QC activities." (BM) Comment: Add ". . .during operation of the emissions unit(s) being monitored unless provided otherwise in the source or emission unit's operating permit" to the end of 326 IAC 3- 5- 8 (c) to address times when the unit is not monitoring or during planned outages. (IUG) Comment: The commenter appreciates IDEM's efforts to clarify that monitoring system malfunctions, repairs, and other QA/QC activities should be recognized as valid events that do not require operation of the CEMS or COMS. The following revisions are offered to the language to clarify its purpose and intent, and to eliminate redundancy or unintentional conflict:

" 326 IAC 3- 5- 8 Operation and Maintenance of continuous emission monitoring and continuous opacity monitoring systems Sec. 8. (a) This section applies to the operation and maintenance of CEMS and COMS. (b) The owner or operator of a CEMS or COMS required by federal or state regulations or permit shall: (1) install; (2) calibrate; (3) maintain; (4) operate; and (5) certify; all necessary such CEMS or COMS and related equipment in accordance with applicable federal regulations, this rule, and any applicable permits. (c) Except for periods when: (1) the affected source or emissions unit is not operating; (2) the affected source or emissions unit is operating under a scenario that does not require CEMS or COMS; (3) the affected source or emissions unit is operating in a scenario where there are no emissions of the pollutant for which the CEMS or COMS measures; (4) the CEMS or COMS is experiencing a malfunction; (5) the owner/operator is repairing the CEMS or COMS; or (6) the owner/operator is conducting CEMS or COMS quality assurance and quality control activities, including, but not limited to: (A) calibration checks; (B) zero and span adjustments; (C) calibration gas audits; or (D) other required quality assurance/quality control activities; system breakdowns, repairs, calibration checks, and zero and span adjustments, all CEMS and COMS shall be in continuous operation." (ELC) Response: IDEM has amended the draft language for preliminary adoption to reflect revisions as suggested by ELC, except for inclusion of subdivisions (2) and (5). IDEM did not include the suggested subdivisions (2) because there are too many possible scenarios with all the regulated sources to consider an across the board exemption, and (5) is covered under the malfunction provisions. This revision includes the revision suggested by the other commenter to limit CEMS/COMS operation to periods of emissions unit operation. Comment: 326 IAC 3- 5- 8 (e)(2) states that the source has to submit reports in accordance with Section 7(d). Section 7(d) only covers reports where there are no excess emissions or monitoring downtime during the reporting period. Amend citation to "section 7." (IUG) Comment: Since section 7(d) only talks about reports where there are no excess emissions or monitoring downtime 326 IAC 3- 5- 8 (e)(2) should be changed to cite "section 7." (IPL) (BT) Response: IDEM has removed the reference to subsection (d) as suggested. Comment: 326 IAC 3- 6- 2 should require IDEM to issue a written approval of a stack test protocol at some point prior to conducting the stack test. (ELC) Comment: There are no time limits on IDEM to indicate its approval or disapproval of the test protocol form in 326 IAC 3- 6- 2 (a). Similarly, 326 IAC 3- 6- 2 (h) provides a new requirement that rescheduled test dates must be approved by the department if notification is provided to IDEM less than 14 days prior to the rescheduled test date. This may be an appropriate area to address with a non-rule policy document (NPD). The commenter requests that this topic be taken up in a workgroup setting with all interested parties given an opportunity to agree upon a suitable protocol. (IUG) Response: At this time IDEM does not have the resources to formally send approval letters to companies. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 6Additionally, protocol approval is often dependent upon a source providing additional information to IDEM and this

often means the reviewer and the source are continuing to discuss the acceptability of the protocol within days of the scheduled test. IDEM continues to approve protocols and works with sources as necessary to ensure any issues with the protocol are communicated within an acceptable time frame. Sources are always free to contact IDEM to discuss the status of any given protocol. IDEM is not proposing to amend the rule as suggested. Comment: Use of the term "minor change" in 326 IAC 3- 6- 2 (d) is vague. (BM) Response: A minor change is simply a change that is generally acceptable and does not involve a change which would require a resubmittal and subsequent review of an already approved protocol. An example of a minor change would be using Method 17 instead of Method 5, or using an instrumental method to measure oxygen and carbon dioxide instead of taking a sample for Orsat Analysis. Comment: Proposed changes at 326 IAC 3- 6- 3 (b)(2) which requires emissions test runs to be conducted within 24 hours unless otherwise impracticable or approved by the commissioner. This is not a realistic requirement for relative accuracy test audits (RATAs) and other non-RATA tests may extend beyond 24 hours also. IDEM should delete this proposed revision to the rule. (IUG) Comment: 326 IAC 3- 6- 3 (b)(2) which requires all test runs for a given pollutant be conducted within 24 hours is more stringent than federal requirements. What is the need for this requirement? Would approvals for more time be considered a variance from the rule requiring public notice? Could IDEM approvals be done in a timely manner? IDEM should adopt an approach similar to U.S. EPA where stack testing approaches are issued as guidance and not a rule to adopt approaches on a case by case basis. (BM) Response: The purpose of this is to ensure sources conclude testing within a reasonable time frame. IDEM understands that circumstances may necessitate a longer time frame therefore the provision does allow for approval of a longer test time. The reason this has been proposed is that IDEM does not want sources conducting a test run, stopping a test and then cancelling the remaining runs after receiving information that the first run appears non-compliant. Sources are free to conduct preliminary test runs at their discretion; however, when the formally scheduled test is to take place, all test runs should be conducted within reasonable timeframes. In order to accommodate more situations up front in the rule, IDEM is proposing in the draft rule for preliminary adoption to change the time frame from 24 hours to 48 hours. Comment: A source should be required to include in the report a summary of the stack test results in comparison to the applicable emission limit that was tested against. This would ensure that the source is aware of the test results as it relates to the emission limit instead of putting the source in the position of asserting, under certification of truth and accuracy, compliance or non-compliance with an emission limit. Many sources view the determination of compliance or non-compliance as a function of IDEM or a court, and fear the risk of further liability if the agency were to determine that a source certified compliance but there was an error in the report that revealed non-compliance. Language proposed in 326 IAC 3- 6- 4 (a)(2)(A) should be deleted. In its place, a new item (F) should be added to 326 IAC 3- 6- 4 (a)(3) that reads as follows: "(F) A stack test result summary table that compares the measured emissions in units consistent with the applicable emissions limitations to the emissions limitations." (ELC) Comment: Amend 326 IAC 3- 6- 4 (a)(2) to require that the source provide a comparison of the emission unit's limit(s) and the result(s) of the stack test(s). As it is currently drafted it appears to ask for the compliance status of every requirement associated with the unit or units tested which would be duplicative of other reporting requirements rather than the results of the stack test. (BM) Comment: Delete the proposed changes at 326 IAC 3- 6- 4 (a)(2)(A) that requires reporting of a "complete listing of all applicable compliance limits." This information is available in the applicable operating permit for a particular emissions unit or source. (IUG) Response: IDEM believes it is helpful to both sources, and IDEM to include the applicable limitations and the compliance status in the test report. In the past there have been cases where the source has failed to mention they are non-compliant and has simply sat back and waited for IDEM to act. In these cases the sources have exceeded their 120 day requirement for retesting, and due to the prioritization at IDEM of non-compliant test reports, these reports were not reviewed for many months as IDEM staff believed them to be compliant. IDEM believes that this not an overly burdensome provision as IDEM assumes sources to already be well aware of the applicable compliance limits in their permits. Restating this information in the test report should require only minimal effort on the source's part. IDEM is proposing to amend the draft rule for preliminary adoption to require "a stack test result summary table that compares the measured emissions in units consistent with the applicable emissions limitations to the emissions limitations." This would ensure that the source is aware of the test results as it relates to the emission limit and clarify that it is a comparison to applicable emissions limitations and not every requirement associated with the unit. Comment: 326 IAC 3- 6- 4 (b) requires sources to submit test reports no later than 45 days after completion of the test with an option to request extended time. There is no means provided for sources to know if an extension was granted. This is an issue that could be settled through workgroup discussion. (IUG) Response: IDEM responds to all extension requests upon receipt. This has been done formally through certified mail, however it is often done via e-mail to expedite the process. Again, sources are always welcome to Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 7inquire about the status of any extension request at any given time.

Comment: IDEM should revise 326 IAC 3- 6- 5 (a)(2) to allow sources to use OTM-28 to measure particulate matter (PM) emissions until U.S. EPA publishes a new or revised condensable PM test method. U.S. EPA is spending a considerable amount of time and money in the development of a test method that will accurately measure condensable PM. IDEM has already acknowledged that U.S. EPA plans to either amend or replace Method 202 for measurement of PM 2.5 by including language in the commenter's air permit requiring testing once U.S. EPA publishes a revised or new test method. (Alcoa) Comment: Add a provision at 326 IAC 3- 6- 5 (a)(2) to allow the use of "other procedures approved by the department" in measuring PM 10 . This would allow a source to request the use of the conditional test method for PM 10 that is designed to eliminate artifacts associated with Method 202. (IUG) Response: IDEM has revised 326 IAC 3- 6- 5 (a)(2) to allow "other methods as approved by the department and U.S. EPA." Comment: The proposed changes to 326 IAC 3- 6- 5 (a)(3) would require visible emissions (VE) evaluation testing during stack tests for PM and PM 10 as well as for "other mass emission rate testing, as required by the department." Waivers would have to be obtained from the department rather than the on-site department staff as currently required. Allow on-site department staff to issue adverse weather condition waivers. Why are VE evaluations required? The VE notations may be a surrogate for particulate, but stack test results for particulate are more accurate than the VE notations or opacity. What is "other mass emission rate testing"? It is not clear that VE or opacity would be an appropriate surrogate for "other mass emission rate testing." What would be the basis the department requiring VE testing? Stacks equipped with wet scrubbers should be exempt from the requirement to conduct VE evaluation during testing. VE evaluations should be eliminated during stack tests, or at least the requirement for VE notations during mass emission rate testing should be deleted. (IPL) (BT) (IUG) Comment: The proposed amendment at 326 IAC 3- 6- 5 (a)(3) for testing of PM or less than PM 10 emissions requiring visible emissions (VE) evaluations in conjunction with PM, PM 10 , or other mass emission rate testing of air pollutants could be interpreted to require Method 9 opacity readings when gaseous pollutants or PM pollutants are measured. Also, the proposed amendment does not provide relief for emission units that installed a PM continuous emissions monitor (PM CEMS), because the final control device is a wet scrubber. U.S. EPA is considering, but has not finalized regulatory relief from compliance with an opacity standard if the emissions unit is equipped with a PM CEMS. The commenter suggests that IDEM add PM2.5 to the list of pollutants tested and remove "other mass emission rate" from 326 IAC 3- 6- 5 (a)(3) and allow waivers from VE readings is the unit is equipped with a PM CEMS. (Alcoa) Response: VE evaluations have always been required during PM/PM 10 tests; this is not a new requirement. By correlating the visible emission level during PM/PM 10 tests to the emission rate it provides inspectors an valuable tool for assessing whether the unit and associated control (if any) are running in the proper manner during inspections that may take places several years after the test. For instance, if during a compliance test the source was within their compliance limit with no visible emissions present, then during an inspection two years later visible emissions as read by the department were 15%, it may provide grounds for conducting another test to ensure the source was still compliant, or at the very least identifying why the visible emissions had changed between the two events. There are requirements to conduct visible emissions evaluations during stack tests for pollutants other than particulate. Lead testing pursuant to 40 CFR 60 is one example. Another example would occur when the testing was for a pollutant that existed in the solid phase such as metal HAPs. While the testing may not be specifically for particulate, the fact that the HAPs are by nature "particles" would make concurrent VE evaluations valuable for the reason already stated above. IDEM has revised the draft rule for preliminary adoption to allow the department or staff member present on-site to grant waivers for VE readings during adverse conditions. IDEM does not consider it appropriate to exempt stacks equipped with wet scrubbers from the requirement to conduct VE evaluation during testing or to remove the requirement for VE notations during mass emission rate testing. IDEM agrees that VE readings are not necessary for units equipped with a PM CEMS and has added this exemption to the draft rule for preliminary adoption. IDEM has added PM2.5 to the list of pollutants tested. Comment: 326 IAC 3- 6- 5 (a)(3) includes the phrase "unless otherwise mandated by federal regulation" How would a federal regulation affect the requirement to conduct visible emissions for at least 30 minutes? (BM) (Alcoa) Response: While the state rule only requires opacity to be read for thirty minutes for every hour of particulate sampling, U.S. EPA requires hour for hour reading. For example, while IDEM would only require three, 30 minute opacity runs at an asphalt plant for state implementation (SIP) compliance, the federal requirement under 40 CFR 60, Subpart I, would mandate three, 60 minute opacity runs. Therefore the federal rule is more stringent and the source would need to perform 180 total minutes of VE reading. Comment: The language in 326 IAC 3- 6- 3 (b)(1)(B) conflicts with 326 IAC 3- 6- 3 (b)(1)(A) (or at the very least, is duplicative) and should be deleted. Clause (A) requires sources to conduct stack testing when it is operating at a minimum of 95% of its maximum operating capacity. In clause (B), the source must conduct a stack test under conditions of "worst case emissions." These terms conflict to the extent that clause (B) requires operating at a Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 8100% capacity irrespective of what clause (A) allows. In addition, clause (C) expands the existing requirements to

allow the department to impose testing conditions where "the department believes that changes in operating capacities have the potential to affect the emission levels." There is no obvious basis for this new condition or limit to the types of "operating capacities" under which IDEM can require tests. Emission limits at sources were established using specific testing protocols and these test protocols must be used during emission testing to demonstrate compliance with the existing limits. Clause (C) should be revised to delete "including, but not limited to, process conditions when the department believes that changes in operating capacities have the potential to affect the emission levels." (IPL) (BT) Comment: The proposed amendments to 326 IAC 3- 6- 3 have changed acceptable performance test conditions from testing at conditions representing "normal operations" to conditions that represent at a minimum of 95% of the unit's listed maximum process or operating rate included in its permit and under conditions of worst case emissions. This differs from federal guidance contained in U.S. EPA's Clean Air Act National Stack Testing Guidance document dated April 27, 2009, which reads in part: Page 16 – A facility is not required automatically to retest if the initial test does not represent the range of combined process and control measure conditions under which the facility expects to operate, or if the test does not challenge to the fullest extent possible the facility's ability to meet applicable emissions standards without creating an unsafe condition. Furthermore, the facility is not required automatically to retest if the facility's operating conditions subsequently vary from those in place during the performance test. The delegated agency must determine whether retesting is warranted. . . Additionally, the proposed amendments would require facilities to rely on a unit's "descriptive operating capacity" for determination of test validity. This descriptive information is not enforceable. Also, the term "worst case emissions" is overly broad. IDEM should restore the validity of emissions testing performed at conditions representative of normal operating conditions. (BM) Response: The requirement to test at or near maximum capacity has not changed. IDEM feels it is necessary to clarify that emissions units should test under conditions of maximum operation, or under conditions which would simulate "worst case" emissions for the pollutant or pollutants being tested. IDEM feels this is the more appropriate way to ensure that sources are compliant at other operating conditions which may involve running at maximum capacity, or under "worst case" conditions. In general, if these requirements are met a question cannot be raised regarding the compliance status under other operating scenarios. Regardless, IDEM also allows other operating conditions to be approved under clauses (B) or (C) in full realization that many sources will need to work with IDEM to develop an agreeable operating scenario for testing. This approach is consistent with other states within region V who require testing at or near maximum capacity. Additionally, U.S. EPA's Clean Air Act National Stack Testing Guidance (on page 15) discusses U.S. EPA's belief that challenging the control device under conditions simulating maximum loading is appropriate for sources with a mass emission limit. Normal operating conditions is overly broad and has often been interpreted to mean an emissions unit can operate at whatever condition it happens to be running at during the scheduled test. It may also create a situation where a company is operating at a much higher capacity than the capacity achieved during the most recent test. This could lead to a situation where a company may be required to retest if a reasonable suspicion exists that the higher operating rate may place the company's compliance status in jeopardy. The intent of the rule language is to clearly communicate that companies should strive for testing at maximum production rates, or a rate that creates a "worst case" condition, or at another production capacity as agreed upon during protocol review. Under these circumstances both IDEM and the source has assurances the source is operating in compliance across the range of expected operating conditions and would remove the possibility of retesting being conducted due to future production increases. IDEM realizes that the descriptive sections of the permit do not constitute enforceable conditions. However, when determining whether the requirements of 326 IAC 3- 6- 3 (b) are being met during testing, IDEM uses the descriptive capacities which were provided by the source as part of the permit application. Without a definitive statement somewhere in the permit of what the maximum operating capacity of a particular unit is, IDEM has no way of ensuring the operating capacity requirement has been met. IDEM disagrees that the term "worst case emissions" is overly broad. Worst case emissions is just that, the operating condition that produces the highest potential emission rate for the pollutant or pollutants that are part of the test program. 326 IAC 3- 6- 3 (b)(1)(B) deals with sources where running at maximum capacity may not simulate worst case conditions. An example is printing presses where in many cases the speed of the line does not correspond to maximum VOC loading. In these cases "worst case" is often a slower line speed with a more complete surface covering. This condition is designed to address these special cases and does not force sources to run at 100% production rates. IDEM has revised the draft rule for preliminary adoption to make it clear that it is clause (A) or (B), not clause (A) and (B). IDEM feels it is useful to retain the "including, but not limited to, process conditions when the department believes that changes in operating capacities have the potential to affect the emission levels" language in clause (C). Comment: 326 IAC 3- 6- 6 provides a regulatory framework to judge the validity of an emissions test. IDEM has not provided sufficient detail in its criteria to invalidate performance results. Why is the proposed rule necessary? (BM) Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 9Comment: Delete proposed new section 326 IAC 3- 6- 6 because the language in it is far too broad and it

provides unfettered discretion to the agency to invalidate a stack test. If the language in this section is tightened up such that the only basis for invalidating a stack test were nonconformance to the stack test protocol, nonconformance with IDEM's written approval of the stack test protocol, or nonconformance with clearly specified regulatory requirements applicable to the test, then the language in the section would more accurately describe when IDEM has authority to invalidate a stack test. As written, it appears this language would allow IDEM to invalidate a stack test if the source or its stack testing contractor failed to follow a verbal instruction or suggestion from IDEM at the time of the stack test. Given the expense of conducting stack tests, sources should not have their stack tests at risk without understanding what the requirements of the test are in writing, through the protocol, protocol approval, or regulations. (ELC) Response: 326 IAC 3- 6- 6 spells out the most common situations that may result in invalidation of a test. We have always had the authority to invalidate a stack test. This does not change or increase IDEM's ability to reject tests, it simply, and clearly gives the most common examples of what sources need to satisfy in order to ensure their tests are acceptable. An example of when IDEM would reject a test that was deemed conditionally acceptable but did not meet the testing requirements would be when calibration data on the stack testers equipment that is not available for review on-site, or calibrations that are performed by staff that indicate a piece of equipment must be recalibrated upon returning from the field. The test may be deemed conditionally acceptable pending a successful calibration outcome. Another example would be when the results of production data could not be verified during testing by the observer. IDEM may invalidate a test upon later discovery that the process or control device was not operated in such a manner as was agreed upon during the test protocol. IDEM may invalidate a stack test based upon verbal communication between an observer and the company at the time of the test. If the observer informs the source during testing that something is conditionally acceptable but will need to be addressed prior to report submittal and subsequently is not, it may result in test rejection. In order to address the concerns expressed by commenters in regards to the broad language in clause (B) requiring the owner or operator to "meet any conditions required by the department. . . that don't meet the testing requirements" IDEM has deleted clause (B) from the draft rule for preliminary adoption. The remaining language in 326 IAC 3- 6- 6 is sufficient to judge the validity of an emissions test. Comment: At 326 IAC 3- 6- 6 (3), the term "fugitive emissions" could be interpreted to be quite broad given the manner in which it is used in the proposed new section. IDEM should better identify fugitive emissions of concern to IDEM and cause the invalidation of testing. (IUG) Response: IDEM has added "or associated capture or control system" to 326 IAC 3- 6- 6 (3) to address fugitive emissions from capture and control systems. Comment: 326 IAC 3- 7- 5 should be revised to state that sources do not need to have a coal sampling analysis SOP if the source uses CEMs for compliance and does not use coal sampling as a backup when the CEM is down. (IPL) (BT) (IUG) Response: IDEM agrees and has added a new subsection (b) to the draft rule for preliminary adoption. Comment: Amend 326 IAC 3- 7- 5 (a)(6) to allow revisions to the SOP to be stored at a central location and made readily available for inspection upon notice by the department. (IUG) Response: Consistent with the language in subsection (c) for maintaining record for the rest of 326 IAC 3- 7- 5 IDEM has revised the language in subsection (a)(6) in the draft rule for preliminary adoption to say that SOP revisions shall be "maintained by the source and made available upon request by the department" and not "kept at the site" as initially proposed. Comment: In 326 IAC 7- 2- 1 (e)(2), the phrase "the other requirements of this rule shall not apply" should be inserted at the end of the sentence. (IPL) (BT) Response: The lead-in line for this subsection (e) (subsection (f) in the draft rule for preliminary adoption) does not require that all methods be used to determine compliance. IDEM has revised the former subsection (g) (subsection (e) in the draft rule for preliminary adoption) to specify that fuel sampling and analysis requirements do not apply when the emissions unit is monitoring using CEMS. Subsection (g) was proposed to be deleted because of the way it was previously written implying that if the owner or operator did not notify the department of CEMS use then the CEMS data could not be used as a means for compliance. Comment: 326 IAC 7- 2- 1 (e) states "compliance determination based on a stack test is not sufficient to demonstrate compliance on a continuous basis." To be more accurate, this should be revised to state "compliance determination based on a stack test is not sufficient to demonstrate compliance or non-compliance on a continuous basis. Compliance determination based on a stack test is also insufficient to demonstrate compliance or non-compliance with emission limits based on averaging period which exceed the stack test, such as 30-day rolling averages." (IPL) (BT) Comment: What is the purpose in stating in 326 IAC 7- 2- 1 (e) that "stack testing is not sufficient to demonstrate compliance on a continuous basis"? Certain units may not warrant parametric monitoring requirements given their potential to emit or history of compliance. This proposed addition is problematic and affects several other requirements. (BM) Response: IDEM inadvertently included the phrase "compliance determination based on a stack test is not Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 10sufficient to demonstrate compliance on a continuous basis" and has deleted it from the draft rule for preliminary

adoption.

SUMMARY/RESPONSE TO COMMENTS RECEIVED AT THE FIRST PUBLIC HEARING On December 1, 2010, the Air Pollution Control Board (board) conducted the first public hearing/board meeting concerning the development of amendments to 326 IAC 3 and 326 IAC 7- 2- 1 . Comments were made by the following parties: Ann McIver (representing Indiana Energy Association) (IEA) Following is a summary of the comments received and IDEM's responses thereto: Comment: The term "peaking unit" proposed at 326 IAC 3- 4- 1 (13) needs further evaluation. The commenter would like to discuss the impact of this provision with IDEM. (IEA) Comment: The new provisions for data requirements at 326 IAC 3- 5- 8 and test invalidation criteria at 326 IAC 3- 6- 6 are not clear. The commenter would appreciate the opportunity to participate in workshops prior to final adoption. (IEA) Response: IDEM will schedule an information meeting with interested parties before presenting the rule to the APCB for final adoption. Comment: The standard operating procedures (SOP) at 326 IAC 3- 5- 4 (c) should be clarified to provide that the SOP manual does not need to be updated between the submittal of revisions, if a record of the change to the procedures is kept in a central location rather than on-site, which is sometimes impractical, and made available for inspection by the department upon request. (IEA) Response: IDEM agrees that the SOP can be kept at only a central office as long as it is readily available to the CEMS operators and IDEM inspectors, when necessary. If a SOP is kept on-site and at a central location, they should contain the same information and any changes should be reflected in both copies. IDEM will continue to discuss this issue with affected parties. Comment: There is confusion related to the timing of submittal of certain reports related to relative accuracy test audits (RATA) at 326 IAC 3- 5- 5 (f). The Indiana Utility Group had submitted comments during the Second Notice of Comment Period that it was common practice to submit RATA reports within 45 days after completion of the tests. It appears that IDEM agreed with these comments, but the provision requiring submittal within 30 days after the end of the quarter remains in the proposed rule. (IEA) Response: IDEM did not amend the rule language because while it is common practice to submit certain reports within 45 days after the completion of the test, such as a RATA report for a CEMS (which is a field test that is often observed by IDEM), the rule requires all quality assurance reports under 326 IAC 3- 5- 5 (f) to be submitted within 30 days after the end of the quarter. Unless the test is completed less than 15 days before the end of a quarter submitting reports within 45 days after the completion of the test would be a more stringent requirement. Other quality assurance activities, such as cylinder gas audits, are also in this section, and these types of reports are submitted within 30 days after the end of the quarter. IDEM will continue to discuss this issue with affected parties. Comment: In the response to comments IDEM agreed that emission test runs should be extended from 24 hours to 48 hours, however, this change is not noted at 326 IAC 3- 6- 3 (b)(2). (IEA) Response: IDEM will make the change to 48 hours in the rule presented for final adoption.

326 IAC 3- 4- 1 ; 326 IAC 3- 4- 2 ; 326 IAC 3- 4- 3 ; 326 IAC 3- 5- 1 ; 326 IAC 3- 5- 2 ; 326 IAC 3- 5- 3 ; 326 IAC 3- 5- 4 ; 326 IAC 3- 5- 5 ; 326 IAC 3- 5- 6 ; 326 IAC 3- 5- 7 ; 326 IAC 3- 5- 8 ; 326 IAC 3- 6- 1 ; 326 IAC 3- 6- 2 ; 326 IAC 3- 6- 3 ; 326 IAC 3- 6- 4 ; 326 IAC 3- 6- 5 ; 326 IAC 3- 6- 6 ; 326 IAC 3- 7- 1 ; 326 IAC 3- 7- 2 ; 326 IAC 3- 7- 3 ; 326 IAC 3- 7- 4 ; 326 IAC 3- 7- 5 ; 326 IAC 7- 2- 1

SECTION 1. 326 IAC 3- 4- 1 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 4- 1 Definitions Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 11 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 1. In addition to the definitions provided in IC 13- 11

, 326 IAC 1- 2 , and 326 IAC 2- 7 , the following definitions apply throughout this article unless expressly stated otherwise: (1) "Applicable emission limitation or standard" means any of the following: (A) A state or federal emission limitation or standard applicable to a regulated hazardous air pollutant under 40 CFR 61* or 40 CFR 63*. (B) A state or federal emission limitation or standard applicable to a regulated air pollutant, other than a hazardous air pollutant under Section 112 of the CAA, for which the source is classified as a major source. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 11(2) (1) "Calendar quarter" means a consecutive three (3) month period (nonoverlapping) beginning on:

(A) January 1; (B) April 1; (C) July 1; or (D) October 1. (3) "Certified emissions monitor" means an emissions monitor that meets all applicable performance specifications of 40 CFR 60* or any other performance specification, and for which performance data has been submitted to and approved by the department. (2) "Capture system" means the equipment, including hoods, ducts, fans, and booths, that is used to contain, capture, and transport a pollutant to a control device. (3) "Continuous emission monitoring system" or "CEMS" means the equipment required by the applicable permit, state rule, or federal regulation used to sample, analyze, measure, and provide a continuous, permanent record of emissions in units of the applicable standard or other form. (4) "Continuous opacity monitoring system" or "COMS" means the equipment required by the applicable permit, state rule, or federal regulation used to measure the opacity of the effluent on a continuous basis as either of the following: (A) The optical density of the effluent gas. (B) The opacity of the effluent gas. (5) "Data" means the results of any type of monitoring or method, including the results of: (A) instrumental or noninstrumental monitoring; (B) emission calculations; (C) manual sampling procedures; (D) record keeping procedures; or (E) any other form of information collection procedure used in connection with any type of monitoring or method. (6) "Emission limitation or standard" means the following: (A) Any applicable requirement under the CAA that constitutes: (i) an emission limitation or standard; (ii) a standard of performance; or (iii) a means of emission limitation. (B) An emission limitation or standard may be expressed: (i) in terms of the pollutant, either as: (AA) a specific quantity, rate, or concentration of emissions; or (BB) the relationship of uncontrolled to controlled emissions; or (ii) as either: (AA) a work practice; (BB) a process or control devices parameter; or (CC) another form of specific: (aa) design; (bb) equipment; (cc) operational; or (dd) operation and maintenance; requirement. (C) For purposes of 326 IAC 3- 8 , an emission limitation or standard shall not include general operation requirements that an owner or operator may be required to meet. (4) (7) "Emission test", "source sampling test", "compliance test", or "performance test" means a procedure for sampling a gas stream from a single sampling location at a facility, an emissions unit, or pollution control equipment, to determine a pollutant emission rate, concentration, or parameter while the facility, emissions unit, or pollution control equipment is operating at conditions that result in measurement of the highest emission or parameter values (prior to any control device), or at other operating conditions approved by the department or U.S. EPA. A test shall comprise three (3) sampling runs for a specified sampling time span. Additional conditions may be required by applicable rules, permit, or enforcement order. The test owner or operator shall be performed perform the test using sampling and analytical procedures approved by the department or U.S. EPA for the specific pollutant or parameter and facility, emissions unit, pollution control equipment, process, or operation. (5) (8) "Emissions unit" means any part of or activity at a source that emits or has the potential to emit any regulated air pollutant for which an emission limitation or standard has been established. This term does not alter or affect the definition of the term "unit" for purposes of Title IV of the CAA or of the term "emissions unit" for purposes of Title V of the CAA. has the meaning set forth in 326 IAC 1- 2- 23.5

. (9) "Exceedance" means a condition that: (A) is detected by monitoring that provides data in terms of an emission limitation or standard; and Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 12(B) indicates that emissions (or opacity) are greater than the applicable emission limitation or

standard (or less than the applicable standard in the case of a percent reduction requirement) consistent with any averaging period specified for averaging the results of the monitoring. (10) "Malfunction" means any sudden, infrequent, and not reasonably preventable failure of air pollution control equipment, process equipment, or a process to operate in a normal or usual manner. Failures that are caused in part by poor maintenance or careless operation are not malfunctions. For purposes of this article, a CEMS or COMS is considered process equipment. (6) "Major source" means any major source as defined in 326 IAC 2- 7- 1 (22), excluding any source described in 326 IAC 2- 7- 1 (22)(A). (7) (11) "Monitoring" means any form of collecting data on a routine basis to determine or otherwise assess compliance with emission limitations or standards. The term includes the following: (A) Record keeping, if records are used to determine or assess compliance with an emission limitation or standard, including: (i) records of raw material content and usage; (ii) records that document compliance with work practice requirements; or (iii) other records used to determine or assess compliance with an emission limitation or standard. (B) Compliance method tests that are conducted on a routine periodic basis. (C) One (1) or more of the following data collection techniques, where appropriate, for a particular circumstance: (i) Continuous emission or opacity monitoring systems. (ii) Continuous process, capture system, control device, or other relevant parameter monitoring systems or procedures, including a PEMS. (iii) Emission estimation and calculation procedures. (iv) Maintenance and analysis of records of fuel or raw materials usage. (v) Recording results of a program or protocol to conduct specific operation and maintenance procedures. (vi) Verification of emissions, process parameters, capture system parameters, or control device parameters, using portable or in situ measurement devices. (vii) Visible emission observations. (viii) Any other form of measuring, recording, or verifying on a routine basis emissions, process parameters, capture system parameters, control device parameters, or other factors relevant to assessing compliance with an emission limitation or standard. (8) "Monitor system malfunction" means any interruption in the collection of valid data as a result of the failure of any component of the system to operate within the specifications of the applicable performance specification. (9) (12) "Out of control" means any data collected by a continuous monitoring system during periods immediately following an out of tolerance quality assurance assessment and prior to an acceptable quality assurance assessment. (10) "Permit" means any applicable permit issued, renewed, amended, revised, or modified under 326 IAC 2- 1

, 326 IAC 2- 2

, 326 IAC 2- 3

, 326 IAC 2- 7

, 326 IAC 2- 8

, or 326 IAC 2- 9

. (13) "Peaking unit" means the following: (A) An emissions unit that has: (i) an average capacity factor of not more than ten and zero-tenths percent (10.0%) during the previous three (3) calendar years; and (ii) a capacity factor of not more than twenty and zero-tenths percent (20.0%) in each of those calendar years. (B) For purposes of 40 CFR 75*, an emissions unit may initially qualify as a peaking unit if the designated representative demonstrates to the satisfaction of the commissioner that the requirements of clause (A) are met, or will in the future be met, through one (1) of the following submissions: (i) For a unit for which a monitoring plan has not been submitted under 40 CFR 75.62*, the designated representative submits either: (AA) capacity factor data for the emissions unit for the three (3) calendar years immediately preceding the date of initial submission of the monitoring plan for the emissions unit under 40 CFR 75.62*; or (BB) if an emissions unit does not have capacity factor data for one (1) or more of the three (3) calendar years immediately preceding the date of initial submission of the monitoring plan for the unit under 40 CFR 75.62*, all available capacity factor data, beginning with the date on which the emissions unit commenced commercial operation, and projected capacity factor data. (ii) For a unit for which a monitoring plan has already been submitted under 40 CFR 75.62*, that has not qualified as a peaking unit under item (i), and where capacity factor changes, the designated Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 13representative submits either:

(AA) three (3) calendar years of data following the change in the emissions unit's capacity factor showing an average capacity factor of not more than ten and zero-tenths percent (10.0%) during the three (3) previous calendar years and a capacity factor of not more than twenty and zero-tenths percent (20.0%) in each of those calendar years; or (BB) one (1) calendar year of data following the change in the emissions unit's capacity factor showing a capacity factor of not more than ten and zero-tenths percent (10.0%) and a statement that this changed pattern of operation resulting in a capacity factor less than ten and zero-tenths percent (10.0%) is considered permanent and is projected to continue for the foreseeable future. (C) For purposes of 40 CFR 75*, an emissions unit that initially qualifies as a peaking unit must meet the criteria in clause (A) each year in order to continue to qualify as a peaking unit. If such an emissions unit fails to meet such criteria for a given year, the emissions unit no longer qualifies as a peaking unit starting January 1 of the year after the year for which the criteria are not met. If an emissions unit failing to meet the criteria in clause (A) initially qualified as a peaking unit under clause (B), the emissions unit may qualify as a peaking unit for a subsequent year only if the designated representative submits the data specified in clause (B)(ii)(AA). (D) An emissions unit required to comply with the provisions of Subpart H of 40 CFR 75*, under a state or federal NO X mass emissions reduction program, may, pursuant to 40 CFR 75.74(c)(11)*, qualify as a peaking unit on an ozone season basis rather than an annual basis, if the owner or operator reports NO X mass emissions and heat input data only during the ozone season. (14) "Predictive emission monitoring system" or "PEMS" means a system that uses process and other parameters as inputs to a computer program or other data reduction system to produce values in terms of the applicable emission limitation or standard. (15) "QA operating quarter" means a calendar quarter in which there are at least one hundred sixty-eight (168) unit operating hours, as defined in subdivision (25), or, for a common stack or bypass stack, a calendar quarter in which there are at least one hundred sixty-eight (168) stack operating hours, as defined in subdivision (24). (11) (16) "Quality assurance" means those activities performed to ensure that monitoring data are sufficiently representative, accurate, precise, reliable, frequent, and timely. Those activities include, but are not limited to, frequent activities (daily) and less frequent activities (weekly, monthly, quarterly, and yearly). establish validity of data used to demonstrate compliance. (17) "Stack operating hour" means a clock hour during which flue gases flow through a particular stack or duct, either for the entire hour or for part of the hour, while any associated emissions units are combusting fuel. (18) "Unit operating hour" means a clock hour during which an emissions unit combusts any fuel, either for part of the hour or for the entire hour.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 4- 1 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2062; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1566; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 30)

SECTION 2. 326 IAC 3- 4- 2 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 4- 2 Certification Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 2. Each report submitted under this article shall contain a certification of truth, accuracy, and completeness. This certification and any other certification required under this article shall state that, based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements and information in the document are true, accurate, and complete. Reports submitted under 326 IAC 3- 8 shall meet the certification requirements of 326 IAC 2- 7- 4 (f). (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 4- 2 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2063; readopted filed Jan 10, Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 142001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477)

SECTION 3. 326 IAC 3- 4- 3 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 4- 3 Conversion factors Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 3. (a) Owners or operators of facilities emissions units subject to this article shall use the following procedures for converting monitoring data to units of the standard where necessary: (1) For The owner or operator of a fossil fuel-fired steam generators, generator shall use the following procedures shall be used to convert gaseous emission monitoring data in parts per million (ppm) to pounds per million British thermal units (Btu) (lbs/MMBtu) where necessary: (A) When the owner or operator of a fossil fuel-fired steam generator elects under this article to measure oxygen (O 2 ) in flue gases, the measurements of owner or operator shall measure the pollutant concentration and oxygen shall be on a dry basis and use the following conversion procedure: used:

(B) When the owner or operator elects under this article to measure carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) in flue gases, the measurement of owner or operator shall measure the pollutant concentration and the CO 2 concentration shall each be on a consistent basis (wet or dry) and use the following conversion procedure: used:

(C) When the owner or operator elects under this article to measure sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) or nitrogen oxides (NO

x ) in the flue gases, the measurement of owner or operator shall measure the diluent concentration and the SO 2 and or the NO

x concentration shall each be on a wet basis and use the following conversion procedure, used, except where wet scrubbers are employed or where moisture is otherwise added to the stack gases:

(D) When the owner or operator elects under this article to measure SO 2 or NO

x in the flue gases, the measurement of owner or operator shall measure the diluent concentration and the SO 2 and or the NO

x concentration shall each be on a wet basis and use the following conversion procedure, shall be used where wet scrubbers or moisture is otherwise present in the stack gases, provided water vapor content of the stack gas is measured at least once every fifteen (15) minutes at the same point as the pollutant and oxygen measurements are made:

(E) The values used in the equations under this subdivision are derived as follows:

C
ws = Pollutant concentration at stack conditions in grams per wet standard cubic meter

(g/wscm) or pounds per wet standard cubic meter (lbs/wscm), determined by
multiplying the average concentration in parts per million (ppm) for each one (1) hour

period by 4.15 × 10 -5 M g/wscm per ppm or 2.59 × 10 -9 M lbs/wscm per ppm, where M
is pollutant molecular weight in grams per gram-mole (g/g-mole) or pounds per
pound-mole (lb/lb-mole). Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 15M = 64.07 for SO 2 and 46.01 for oxides of nitrogen (NO

x ) as NO 2 . C = Pollutant concentration at stack conditions in pounds per dry standard cubic meter

(lbs/dscm) or grams per dry standard cubic meter (g/dscm). F, F
c = A factor representing a ratio of the volume of dry flue gases generated to the calorific

value of the fuel combusted (F), and a factor representing a ratio of the volume of carbon dioxide generated to the calorific value of the fuel combusted (F
c ), respectively.
Values of F and F
c are given in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 19*, as applicable.

F
w = A factor representing a ratio of the volume of wet flue gases generated to the calorific

value of the fuel combusted. Values of F

w are given in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method
19*.

B
wa = Proportion by volume of water vapor in the ambient air.

B
ws = Proportion by volume of water vapor in the stack gas. E = Pollutant emission, lbs/MMBtu.
Percent O 2 , percent CO 2 = Oxygen or carbon dioxide volume (expressed as percent) determined with equipment

specified under this article.

Percent O 2ws = Oxygen volume (expressed as percent) measurements made at stack conditions on a

wet basis. (2) For sulfuric acid plants, or production facilities, the owner or operator shall: (A) establish a conversion factor three (3) times daily according to the procedures of 40 CFR 60.84(b)*; (B) multiply the conversion factor by the average sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) concentration in the flue gases to obtain average SO 2 emissions in pounds per ton (lbs/ton); and (C) report the average sulfur dioxide emissions for each three (3) hour period in excess of the emission standard set forth in 326 IAC 7 in the quarterly summary. report.

(b) The department may approve alternate procedures for computing emission averages that do not require integration of data or alternative methods of converting pollutant concentration measurements to units of the emission standard may be approved by the department if the owner or operator shows that the alternate procedures are at least as accurate as those in this rule.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 4- 3; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2063; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1566; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 31)

SECTION 4. 326 IAC 3- 5- 1 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 5- 1 Applicability; continuous monitoring requirements for applicable pollutants Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 1. (a) This rule establishes the following: (1) Substantive requirements for monitoring certain types of sources. (2) A process for developing suitable monitoring requirements for other types of sources.

(b) (a) This rule applies to the following sources and facilities hereinafter referred to as affected facilities: or emissions units to determine compliance with an emission limitation or standard: Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 16(1) Any facility emissions unit required to perform continuous monitoring under 326 IAC 12

. which

incorporates by reference the requirements of 40 CFR 60*, or by a standard for hazardous air pollutants under 326 IAC 14

, which incorporates by reference the requirements of 40 CFR 61*, or 326 IAC 20

, which incorporates by reference the requirements of 40 CFR 63*. (2) Fossil fuel-fired steam generators of greater than one hundred million (100,000,000) British thermal units (Btus) (Btu) per hour heat input capacity. (3) Sulfuric acid plants or production facilities of greater than three hundred (300) tons per day acid production capacity. (4) Petroleum refinery catalyst regenerators for fluid bed catalytic cracking units of greater than twenty thousand (20,000) barrels or eight hundred forty thousand (840,000) gallons per day fresh feed capacity. (5) Portland cement plants. (6) Facilities Sources or emissions units that combust sewage sludge. (7) Sources or emissions units making coke from raw materials, including the following: (A) Coal refining byproducts. (B) Petroleum refining byproducts. (8) Facilities Emissions units in Clark and Floyd Counties that: (A) have potential to emit nitrogen oxides (NO

x ) of greater than or equal to forty (40) tons per year; and (B) are located at sources that have potential to emit NO

x of greater than or equal to one hundred (100) tons per year as described in 326 IAC 10

. (9) Any emissions unit required to monitor under subsection (c).

(c) (b) Owners and operators of sources and facilities or emissions units described in subsection (b) (a) are subject to the following requirements: (1) Any facility emissions unit subject to 326 IAC 12 which incorporates by reference the requirements of 40 CFR 60*, 326 IAC 14

, which incorporates by reference the requirements of 40 CFR 61*, or 326 IAC 20

, which incorporates by reference the requirements of 40 CFR 61*, shall comply with the following: (A) The monitoring and reporting requirements as specified for the applicable rule. (B) All requirements of this rule. (2) The owner or operator of a fossil fuel-fired steam generators generator of greater than one hundred million (100,000,000) Btu per hour heat input capacity shall continuously monitor the following: (A) Opacity, unless one (1) of the following occurs: (i) Gaseous fuel is the only fuel combusted. (ii) Oil or a mix of gas and oil are the only fuels combusted and the facility emissions unit is able to comply with both of the following rules without using particulate matter collection equipment: (AA) 326 IAC 5- 1

. (BB) 326 IAC 6- 2

. (iii) An alternative monitoring requirement request has been granted by the department and approved by U.S. EPA. The owner or operator may request an alternative monitoring requirement may be requested when installation of an opacity monitoring system would not provide accurate determinations of emissions as a result of interference from condensed uncombined water vapor. Any alternative monitoring requirement request shall address the following: (AA) Information pertaining to the inability of the affected facility emissions unit to find an acceptable monitoring location prior to the source of the condensed, uncombined water vapor. (BB) A list of proposed alternative monitoring requirements. For each proposed alternative monitoring requirement, the request must provide a detailed description of thresholds or triggers for corrective action resulting from deviation from normal operating parameters and how deviations from key surrogate parameters shall be addressed to insure ensure continuous compliance with all applicable particulate and opacity requirements. An example of an acceptable alternative monitoring requirement is a particulate compliance demonstration that is no less frequent than annual performed at least annually, in accordance with 326 IAC 3- 6 and a compliance monitoring plan that, at a minimum, satisfies monitoring requirements under 326 IAC 2- 7 or 326 IAC 2- 8

. (CC) Record keeping that is consistent with section 6 of this rule. (DD) Reporting frequency that is no less frequent than that required in section 7 of this rule. (iv) An alternative monitoring requirement request granted by the department under item (iii) shall be submitted to U.S. EPA as a state implementation plan (SIP) revision and shall not be in effect until approved as a SIP revision. (B) Sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) under the following conditions: (i) SO 2 pollution control equipment has been installed. (ii) A monitor is required to determine compliance with either: of the following: (AA) 326 IAC 12 ; or Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 17(BB) a new construction permit or operating permit required under 326 IAC 2

.

(C) Nitrogen oxide (NO

x ) under the following conditions: (i) NO

x pollution control equipment has been installed. (ii) A monitor is required to determine compliance with either: of the following: (AA) 326 IAC 12 ; or (BB) a new construction permit or operating permit required under 326 IAC 2

. (D) The percent oxygen (O 2 ) or carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) if measurements of O 2 or CO 2 in the flue gas are required to convert either SO 2 or NO

x continuous monitoring data, or both, to units of the emission limitation for the particular facility. emissions unit. (3) Sulfuric acid plants or production facilities of greater than three hundred (300) tons per day acid production capacity shall monitor SO 2 for each sulfuric acid producing facility emissions unit within the source. (4) Petroleum refinery catalyst regenerators for fluid bed catalytic cracking units of greater than twenty thousand (20,000) barrels or eight hundred forty thousand (840,000) gallons per day fresh feed capacity shall monitor opacity for each regenerator within the source. (5) Portland cement plants shall monitor opacity at the following facilities: emissions units: (A) Kilns. (B) Clinker coolers. (6) Facilities Sources or emissions units that combust sewage sludge shall monitor from the effluent gas exiting the incinerator the following: (A) Total hydrocarbons. (B) Oxygen. (C) Moisture, unless an alternative method is approved by the department and the U.S. EPA. (D) Temperature. (7) Sources or emissions units making coke from coal shall monitor opacity on the underfire stack associated with each coke oven battery. (8) Facilities Emissions units in Clark and Floyd counties that have potential to emit NO

x greater than or equal to forty (40) tons per year and are located at sources that have potential to emit NO

x greater than or equal to one hundred (100) tons per year shall install NO

x continuous emission monitors as described in 326 IAC 10- 1

.

(c) Upon approval by the department, the owner or operator of an emissions unit required to continuously monitor opacity under this section may be exempted from the requirement to install, certify, and operate a COMS if: (1) a particulate CEMS for measuring PM emissions is used to demonstrate continuous compliance with any applicable emissions limitation; and (2) the particulate CEMS is installed, certified, operated, and maintained on the affected source in accordance with the requirements of Performance Specification 11 (PS-11)* and Procedure 2 of 40 CFR 60, Appendix F*.

(d) The department may require, as a condition of a construction or operating permit issued under 326 IAC 2- 1

, 326 IAC 2- 1.1
, 326 IAC 2- 2

, 326 IAC 2- 3

, 326 IAC 2- 7

, 326 IAC 2- 8 , or 326 IAC 2- 9 that the owner or operator of a new or existing source of air emissions monitor emissions to ensure compliance with the following: (1) An emission limitation or standard established in one (1) of the permits listed in this subsection. (2) Permit requirements. (3) Monitoring requirements in 326 IAC 7

.

(e) Unless explicitly stated otherwise, nothing in this rule shall: (1) excuse the owner or operator of a source or emissions unit from any monitoring, record keeping, or reporting requirement that applies under any provision of the CAA or state statutes or regulations; rules; or (2) restrict the authority of the department to impose additional or more restrictive monitoring, record keeping, testing, or reporting requirements on any owner or operator of a source or emissions unit under any other provision of the CAA, including Section 114(a)(1), or state statutes or regulations, rules, as applicable.

(f) Within one hundred eighty (180) days of startup or, for a source existing on the effective date of this rule, within three hundred sixty-five (365) days of becoming an affected facility under this rule, All continuous monitoring systems shall be installed and operational and have the certification testing complete pursuant to under section 3 of this rule within one hundred eighty (180) days of start-up of the emissions unit.

*Copies of these documents may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 18NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental

Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 5- 1 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2064; filed Dec 20, 2001, 4:30 p.m.: 25 IR 1596; errata filed Jan 7, 2002, 2:20 p.m.: 25 IR 1644)

SECTION 5. 326 IAC 3- 5- 2 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 5- 2 Minimum performance and operating specifications Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 2. Owners and operators of monitoring equipment installed to comply with this rule shall comply with the performance specifications and operating requirements as follows: (1) Performance specifications set forth in 40 CFR 60, Appendix B*, shall be used to certify monitoring equipment installed pursuant to this rule; however, where reference is made to the administrator in 40 CFR 60, Appendix B*, the term "department" shall be inserted for purposes of this rule, and where continuous emissions monitors were installed prior to March 1983 for measuring opacity, the performance specifications in 40 CFR 60, Appendix B*, 1982 Edition, shall apply. (2) Cycling times, which include the total time a monitoring system requires to sample, analyze, and record an emission measurement, shall be as follows: (A) Continuous monitoring systems for measuring opacity shall complete a minimum of one (1) cycle of operation (sampling, analyzing, and data recording) for each successive ten (10) second period. (B) Continuous monitoring systems that measure the following emissions shall complete a minimum of one (1) cycle of operation (sampling, analyzing, and data recording) for each successive fifteen (15) minute measuring period: (i) Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ). (ii) Carbon monoxide (CO). (iii) Hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S). (iv) Oxides of nitrogen (NO

x ). (v) Oxygen (O 2 ). (vi) Sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ). (vii) Total hydrocarbons (THC). (viii) Total reduced sulfur (TRS). (ix) Volatile organic compounds (VOC). (x) Particulate matter (PM). (3) For opacity monitoring when effluent from two (2) or more affected facilities is emissions units are combined before being released to the atmosphere, the owner or operator may either install a COMS: (A) install a continuous opacity monitoring system on the combined effluent; or (B) install a continuous opacity monitoring system comprised of, and capable of combining the signals from, component transmissometers on each effluent stream. Results shall be reported on combined effluent. This requirement shall not apply to facilities utilizing emissions units using wet flue gas desulfurization equipment. For facilities emissions units using wet flue gas desulfurization equipment, opacity may be reported on the combined exhaust or on individual exhausts except as provided for facilities emissions units affected by an NSPS as described at 40 CFR 60.13(i)*. Compliance for facilities emissions units that opt to report on the individual exhausts shall be determined on the individual exhausts based on data provided in accordance with section 7 of this rule. (4) When the effluent from two (2) or more affected facilities emissions units subject to the same emission standard, other than opacity, are combined before being released to the atmosphere, the owner or operator may report the results as required for each affected facility emissions unit or for the combined effluent. (5) Instrument full-scale response or upper limit of concentration measurement range for all opacity monitoring systems shall be set at one hundred percent (100%) opacity if possible. If the monitoring system is a requirement of required by 40 CFR 60*, 40 CFR 61*, 40 CFR 63*, or 40 CFR 75*, then the appropriate instrument span values and cycling times pursuant to the applicable part shall be used. In all cases, the manufacturer's procedures for calibration shall be followed and may result in an upscale maximum response of less than one hundred percent (100%). The minimum instrument full-scale response for gaseous monitoring systems shall be set at two hundred percent (200%) of the expected instrument data display output Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 19corresponding to the emission limitation for the facility emissions unit unless a request for an alternative

setting that provides the following information is submitted to and approved by the department and U.S. EPA in writing: (A) The proposed alternate instrument span value. (B) The expected range of pollutant measured concentrations. (C) The control device in use. (D) The process to be controlled. (E) The location of the monitor, such as stack or duct. (F) The reason for requesting the alternate instrument span value. (6) The department and U.S. EPA may approve locations for installing continuous monitoring systems or monitoring devices that vary from locations provided under the performance specifications of 40 CFR 60, Appendix B*, shall be approved by the department and the U.S. EPA upon a demonstration by the owner or operator that installation at alternative locations will enable accurate and representative measurements. (7) Owners or operators of affected facilities emissions units shall conduct continuous emission monitoring system CEMS performance evaluations, upon the request of the department or U.S. EPA, to demonstrate continuing compliance of the continuous emission monitoring systems CEMS with performance specifications as follows: (A) A performance evaluation is a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the performance of the continuous emission monitor in terms of: (i) accuracy; (ii) precision; (iii) reliability; (iv) representativeness; and (v) comparability; of the data acquired by the monitoring system. (B) The department or U.S. EPA may request owners or operators of affected facilities, emissions units,

as defined described in section 1(b) of this rule, to conduct continuous emission monitoring system CEMS performance evaluations if the department has reason to believe, based on review of monitoring data, quality assurance data, inspections, or other information, that the continuous emission monitoring system CEMS is malfunctioning or may be providing invalid data over an extended period. (C) The owner or operator of an affected emissions unit shall submit a written report containing the complete information of the performance evaluations shall be furnished to the department within forty-five (45) days after the test date. The department or U.S. EPA may conduct performance evaluations of the continuous emission monitoring systems CEMS at any time in order to verify the continued compliance of the systems with the performance specifications.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 5- 2 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2066; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1566; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 32)

SECTION 6. 326 IAC 3- 5- 3 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 5- 3 Monitor system certification Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 3. Monitor system certification requirements apply to sources and facilities or emissions units subject to this rule as follows: (1) The owner or operator shall conduct the applicable performance specifications tests in accordance with the procedures specified in 40 CFR 60*, or other applicable federal regulations, for the required monitoring system as follows: (A) Not later than one hundred eighty (180) days after a facility emissions unit start-up or initial monitor installation date. (B) Not later than forty-five (45) emissions unit operating days after the date of monitor replacement, date, Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 20or significant monitor repair as described in IDEM's Quality Assurance Compliance Branch Continuous

Emissions Monitoring Guidance Manual, Chapter 20 (dated June 20, 1997)** Chapters 1 and 2* (December 1999), which affects the ability of the analyzer to function date. measure emissions accurately. (2) The owner or operator shall notify the department in writing as follows: (A) No less than fourteen (14) days in advance of the start of continuous opacity monitor (COM) certification. (B) No less than thirty-five (35) days in advance of the certification of a gaseous monitoring system. (3) The owner or operator shall submit all of the required test data and information in the form of a written report to the department for review and approval within forty-five (45) days of completion of the performance specification test. (4) The department shall issue a written notice of certification status upon review of the complete certification test report. A required monitoring system is certified when the department issues a certification letter stating that the required monitoring system, including all applicable components, has satisfactorily met all federal and state monitoring requirements. (5) The department may decertify a required monitoring system if an audit or performance evaluation reveals that such the monitoring system or a component thereof does not meet applicable performance specifications or requirements. The owner or operator shall repeat the certification process for the required monitoring system within forty-five (45) days of the date of the department's decertification of the required monitoring system.

*This document is *These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204.

**This document is incorporated by reference. Copies are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center-North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 5- 3; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2067; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 33)

SECTION 7. 326 IAC 3- 5- 4 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 5- 4 Standard operating procedures Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 4. (a) The owner or operator of each affected facility specified in section 1(b) of this rule, any facility subject to 326 IAC 12

, or any other facility required to monitor emissions on a continuous basis shall submit to the department, Within ninety (90) days after monitor installation, a complete, written continuous monitoring standard operating procedures procedure (SOP) must be submitted to the department by the owner or operator of: (1) each affected source or emissions unit specified in section 1(a) of this rule; or (2) any other source or emissions unit required to monitor emissions on a continuous basis.

(b) If revisions are made to the SOP, the owner or operator must submit updates shall be submitted to the department biennially. within two (2) years of the revisions.

(c) At a minimum, the SOP shall describe complete step-by-step procedures and operations as follows: (1) A description of the facility emissions unit monitored. (2) A listing of the following for each monitor: (A) Each monitor's brand. (A) Manufacturer's name. (B) Model number. (C) Serial number. (D) Monitoring location. (E) Data handling and acquisition system. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 21(3) Examples of all reporting and log forms.

(4) Record keeping and reporting procedures that include the following: (A) Reporting of instrument precision and accuracy. (B) Reporting of emissions data. (5) Methods and procedures for analysis and data acquisition. (6) Calibration procedures that include the following: (A) Calibration error limits and linearity. (B) Calibration gas type, gas quality, and traceability to the National Institute of Standards and Technology. (C) Calibration frequency. (D) Criteria for recalibration, and analysis procedures to periodically verify the accuracy of span and calibration standards. (7) Operation procedures that include: (A) daily procedures; (B) quantifying and recording daily zero (0) and high level drift that meet the requirements of: (i) 40 CFR 60, Appendix B*, Performance Specification 2, Section 4.2; or (ii) other applicable regulations; and (C) other operating parameter checks indicating correct operational status. (8) Quality control and quality assurance procedures that include the following: (A) A statement of quality policy and objectives. (B) Organization and responsibilities description. (C) Calibration and span and zero (0) drift criteria. (D) Excessive drift criteria. (E) Corrective action for excessive drift. (F) Precision and accuracy audits. (G) Corrective action for accuracy audits failure. (H) Data validity criteria. (I) Participation in department audits. (J) Data recording and calculation audits. (9) Preventive maintenance procedures and corrective maintenance procedures that include those procedures taken to ensure continuous operation and to minimize malfunctions. (10) A listing of the manufacturer's recommended spare parts inventory.

(b) (d) If a facility emissions unit owner or operator fails to submit a SOP or submits a SOP that fails to address the factors procedures and operations provided under subsection (a), (c), the department may require a performance evaluation pursuant to section 2 of this rule.

*This document is incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 5- 4 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2068; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 34)

SECTION 8. 326 IAC 3- 5- 5 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 5- 5 Quality assurance requirements Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 5. (a) Except where for affected units under 40 CFR 75* is applicable for affected facilities under the acid rain program that are also emissions units subject to this rule, quality assurance requirements specified in this section and 40 CFR 60*, Appendix F, apply to continuous emission monitors that monitor the following: (1) Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ). (2) Carbon monoxide (CO). (3) Hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S). (4) Nitrogen oxide (NO

x ). (5) Oxygen (O 2 ). Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 22(6) Sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ).

(7) Total hydrocarbons (THC). (8) Total reduced sulfur (TRS). (9) Volatile organic compounds (VOC). (10) Particulate matter (PM).

(b) Facilities Emissions units that are also subject to 40 CFR 75* shall follow the quality assurance procedures of 40 CFR 75* and report the results in accordance with subsection (e). (f).

(c) Quality control (QC) requirements for continuous opacity monitoring systems COMS are as follows: (1) For calibration drift (CD) assessment, the COMS shall be checked at least once daily. The CD shall be quantified and recorded at zero (0) (or low level) and upscale level opacity. The COMS shall be adjusted whenever the CD exceeds the specification of 40 CFR 60, Appendix B*, Performance Specification 1 (PS-1), and the COMS shall be declared out of control when the CD exceeds twice the specification of PS-1. Corrective actions, followed by a validating CD assessment, are required when the COMS is out of control. (2) For fault indicators assessment, the fault lamp indicators, data acquisition system error messages, and other system self-diagnostic indicators shall be checked at least daily. Appropriate corrective actions shall be taken when the COMS is operating outside the preset limits. (3) For performance audits, checks of the individual COMS components and factors affecting the accuracy of the monitoring data, as described in this subdivision, shall be conducted, at a minimum, on a calendar quarter basis. The absolute minimum checks included in the performance audit are as follows: (A) The status of the optical alignment of the monitor components shall be checked and recorded according to the procedure specified by the monitor manufacturer. Monitor components must be realigned as necessary. (B) The apparent effluent opacity shall be compared and recorded before and after cleaning each of the exposed optical surfaces. The total optical surface dust accumulation shall be determined by summing up the apparent reductions in opacity for all of the optical surfaces that are cleaned. Caution should be employed in performing this check since fluctuations in effluent opacity occurring during the cleaning cycle may adversely affect the results. (C) The zero (0) and upscale response errors shall be determined and recorded according to the CD procedures. The errors are defined as the difference (in percent opacity) between the correct value and the observed value for the zero (0) and high level calibration checks. (D) The value of the zero (0) compensation applied at the time of the audit shall be calculated as equivalent opacity, corrected to stack exit conditions, according to the procedures specified by the manufacturer. The compensation applied to the effluent recorded by the monitor system shall be recorded. (E) The optical pathlength correction ratio (OPLR) shall be computed from the monitor pathlength and stack exit diameter and shall be compared, and the difference recorded, to the monitor setup OPLR value. The stack exit correlation error shall be determined as the absolute value of the difference between the measured value and the correct value, expressed as a percentage of the correct value. (F) A three-point calibration error test of the COMS shall be conducted. Three (3) neutral density filters meeting the requirements of PS-1 shall be placed in the COMS light beam path. The monitor response shall be independently recorded from the COMS permanent data recorder. Make A total of five (5) nonconsecutive readings for each filter shall be made. The low-range, mid-range, and high-range calibration error results shall be computed as the mean difference and ninety-five percent (95%) confidence interval for the difference between the expected and the actual responses of the monitor as corrected to stack exit conditions. These values shall be calculated using the procedure of PS-1, Section 8.0. The following are requirements for these values: (i) The calibration error test requires the installation of an external calibration audit device (zero-jig). The zero-jig shall be adjusted to provide the same zero (0) response as the monitor's simulated zero (0). (ii) Use calibration attenuators, that is, neutral density filters or screens, with values that have been determined according to PS-1, Section 7.1.3, "Attenuator Calibration", and produce simulated opacities (as corrected to stack exit conditions) in the ranges listed in Table 1-2 in PS-1. (iii) The stability of the attenuator values shall be checked at least once per year according to the procedures specified in PS-1. The attenuators shall be recalibrated if the stability checks indicate a change of two percent (2%) opacity or greater. (4) The following are requirements for monitor acceptance criteria: (A) The following criteria are to be used for determining to determine if the COMS audit results are acceptable:

TABLE 1. PERFORMANCE AUDIT CRITERIA

Stack Exit Correlation Error < 2 percent Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 23Zero and Upscale Responses < 2 percent opacity Zero Compensation < 4 percent opacity Optical Alignment Misalignment error < 2 percent opacity Optical Surface Dust Accumulation < 4 percent opacity Calibration Error < 3 percent opacity (B) The COMS is out of control whenever the results of a quarterly performance audit indicate noncompliance with any of the performance assessment criteria of Table 1 in clause (A). If the COMS is out of control, the owner or operator must shall take the action necessary to eliminate the problem. Following corrective action, the source or emissions unit owner or operator must shall reconduct the appropriate failed portion of the audit and other applicable portions to determine whether the COMS is operating properly and within specifications. The COMS owner or operator shall record both audit results showing the COMS to be out of control and the results following corrective action. COMS data obtained during any out of control period may not be used for compliance determination; the data may be used for identifying periods where there has been a failure to meet quality assurance and control criteria. (C) Repeated audit failures, that is, out of control conditions resulting from revealed in the quarterly audits, indicate that the QC procedures are inadequate or the COMS is incapable of providing quality data. The

source or emissions unit owner or operator shall: (i) increase the frequency of the above QC procedures in this subsection until the performance criteria are maintained; or (ii) modify or replace the COMS whenever two (2) consecutive quarters of unacceptable performance

occur. (5) The performance audit calculations contained in PS-1, Section 8 shall be followed.

(d) Except where 40 CFR 75* is applicable for affected facilities emissions units under the acid rain program, and except for peaking units as defined in 326 IAC 3- 4- 1 (13), quality control requirements for flow monitoring systems are as follows: (1) For CD assessment, the flow monitoring system shall be checked at least once daily. The CD shall be quantified and recorded at zero (0) (or low level) and upscale level. The flow monitoring systems shall be adjusted whenever the CD exceeds the specification of 40 CFR 60, Appendix B, Performance Specification 6 (PS-6)*, and the flow monitoring systems shall be declared out of control when the CD exceeds twice the specification of PS-6. Corrective actions, followed by a validating CD assessment, are required when the flow monitoring system is out of control. (2) An annual relative accuracy test.

(e) A peaking unit as defined in 326 IAC 3- 4- 1 (13) shall comply with the following quality control requirements: (1) The owner or operator of a peaking unit, based on information submitted by the designated representative in the monitoring plan, shall comply with one (1) of the following: (A) Meet the general operating requirements in 40 CFR 75.10* for a NO X CEMS. (B) Provide information satisfactory to the commissioner using the procedure specified in 40 CFR 75, Appendix E* for estimating hourly NO X emission rate, subject to the following: (i) If, in the years after certification of an excepted monitoring system under 40 CFR 75, Appendix E*, an emissions unit's operations exceed a capacity factor of twenty percent (20%) in any calendar year or exceed a capacity factor of ten and zero-tenths percent (10.0%) averaged over three (3) years, the owner or operator shall install, certify, and operate a NO X -diluent CEMS no later than December 31 of the following calendar year. (ii) If the required CEMS has not been installed and certified by the date in item (i), the owner or operator shall report the maximum potential NO X emission rate, as defined in 40 CFR 72.2*, for each unit operating hour, starting with the first unit operating hour after the deadline and continuing until the CEMS has been provisionally certified. (2) The owner or operator of a peaking unit shall conduct a relative accuracy test audit (RATA) on any required CEMS as follows: (A) Except for mercury monitoring systems and as otherwise specified in 40 CFR 75.21(a)(6)*, 40 CFR 75.21(a)(7)*, or 40 CFR 75, Appendix B, Section 2.3.1.2*, RATA shall be performed once every two (2) successive quality assurance (QA) operating quarters for each primary and redundant backup: (i) SO 2 pollutant concentration monitor; (ii) flow monitor; Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 24(iii) CO 2 emissions concentration monitor, including O 2 monitors used to determine CO 2 emissions;

(iv) CO 2 or O 2 diluent monitor used to determine heat input; (v) moisture monitoring system; (vi) NO X concentration monitoring system; (vii) NO X -diluent CEMS; or (viii) SO 2 -diluent CEMS. (B) For each primary and redundant backup mercury concentration monitoring system and each sorbent trap monitoring system, RATAs shall be performed once every four (4) successive QA operating quarters. (C) A calendar quarter that does not qualify as a QA operating quarter shall be excluded in determining the deadline for the next RATA. (D) Not more than eight (8) successive calendar quarters shall elapse after the quarter in which a RATA was last performed without a subsequent RATA having been conducted. (E) If a RATA has not been completed by the end of the eighth calendar quarter since the quarter of the last RATA, then the RATA must be completed within a seven hundred twenty (720) unit, or stack, operating hour grace period, as provided in 40 CFR 75, Appendix B, Section 2.3.3,* following the end of the eighth successive elapsed calendar quarter, or data from the CEMS will become invalid. (F) The relative accuracy test audit frequency of a CEMS may be reduced, as specified in 40 CFR 75, Appendix B, Section 2.3.1.2*, for primary or redundant backup monitoring systems that qualify for less frequent testing. (G) All required RATAs shall be performed in accordance with the applicable procedures and provisions in 40 CFR 75, Appendix A, Sections 6.5 through 6.5.2.2* and 40 CFR 75, Appendix B, Sections 2.3.1.3* and 2.3.1.4*. (H) For a CO monitor and any other applicable monitor as determined by the commissioner, a RATA shall be performed in accordance with the requirements of this subdivision.

(e) (f) Reporting requirements for performance audits are as follows: (1) Owners or operators of facilities emissions units required to conduct: (A) cylinder gas audit; (B) relative accuracy test audit; or (C) continuous opacity monitor calibration error audit; on continuous emission monitors shall prepare a written report of the results of the performance audit for each calendar quarter, or for other periods required by the department. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports shall be submitted to the department within thirty (30) calendar days after the end of each quarter. (2) The performance audit report shall contain the following information: (A) Plant and monitor information, including the following: (i) The plant name and address. (ii) The monitor brand or manufacturer's name, model, and serial number. (iii) The monitor span. (iv) The monitor location. for example, duct, boiler, unit, or stack designation. (B) Performance audit information, including the following: (i) The auditor's name. (ii) A copy of the audit standard's certification. for example, the vendor's Protocol 1 certification, or neutral density filter certification. (iii) All data used to calculate the audit results. (iv) The audit results and an indication if the monitor passed or failed the audit. If the performance audit results show the CEMS or COMS to be out of control, the CEMS or COMS owner or operator must shall report both the audit results showing the CEMS or COMS to be out of control and the results of the audit following corrective action showing the COMS to be operating within specification. (v) Any corrective actions performed as the result of a failed audit.

(f) If (g) Whenever a relative accuracy test audit of any continuous emission monitor listed in subsection (a) or (e) is performed, the department must be notified in accordance with the protocol requirements of 326 IAC 3- 6- 2 at least thirty-five (35) days prior to the audit.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 25(Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 5- 5 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2069; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 34)

SECTION 9. 326 IAC 3- 5- 6 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 5- 6 Record keeping requirements Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 6. (a) On and after the certification of a monitoring system, the owner or operator of a source or emissions unit subject to this rule shall maintain records, including raw data, of all monitoring data and supporting information for a minimum of five (5) years from the date of any of the following: (1) A monitoring sample. (2) A measurement. (3) A test. (4) A certification. (5) A report. (6) Any other activity required under this article.

(b) The records described in subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) All documentation relating to: (A) design, installation, and testing of all elements of the monitoring system; and (B) required corrective action or compliance plan activities. (2) All maintenance logs, calibration checks, and other required quality assurance activities. (3) All records of corrective and preventive action. (4) A log of plant operations, including emission unit or monitoring system downtime with the following information: (A) Date of facility emissions unit or monitoring system downtime. (B) Time of commencement and completion of each downtime. (C) Reason for each downtime. (D) Nature of system repairs and adjustments.

(c) The owner or operator of a source or emissions unit subject to this rule shall maintain the records required by this section at the source or at such other site, in a manner so that they may be inspected by and make them available to the department or the U.S. EPA if so requested or required. upon request. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 5- 6 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2071)

SECTION 10. 326 IAC 3- 5- 7 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 5- 7 Reporting requirements Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 7. (a) The following reporting requirements apply to sources owner or operator of a source or emissions unit subject to this rule shall submit a monitoring report to the department in accordance with this section.

(b) The owner or operator shall submit the monitoring report in accordance with the following requirements: (1) The owner or operator of sources or emissions units subject to the requirements of section 1 of this rule shall report excess emissions no less frequently than quarterly. For sources required to report the owner or operator of a source or emissions unit for which quarterly such reports are required, the reports shall be: (A) submitted by the facility source or emissions unit owner or operator to the department; and Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 26(B) postmarked or delivered by other means no later than thirty (30) calendar days following the last day of

the reporting period. (2) If a permit specifies or a rule requires more frequent reports, such the reports shall be: (A) submitted by the facility source or emissions unit owner or operator to the department; and (B) postmarked or delivered by other means no later than fifteen (15) calendar days after the end of each month. (3) Gaseous excess emissions data reports shall be reported using three (3) hour block periods ending at: (A) 03:00; (B) 06:00; (C) 09:00; (D) 12:00; (E) 15:00; (F) 18:00; (G) 21:00; and (H) 24:00; For facilities that unless the emissions unit must demonstrate compliance with hourly (one (1) hour), a different averaging period as specified by an applicable rule or permit condition, such as, daily (twenty-four (24) hour) average, or thirty (30) day averages. such information shall be submitted as part of the quarterly report required in this section.

(4) (c) The monitoring report shall contain the following continuous monitoring information summaries, with all times reported in real time: (A) (1) Monitored facility emission unit operation time during the reporting period. (B) (2) Excess emissions or parameters, as applicable, reported in units of the standard, or the applicable parameter unit as follows: (i) (A) Date of excess emissions, or other applicable dates. (ii) (B) Time of commencement and completion for each applicable parameter deviation or excess emission data. (C) (3) Magnitude of each excess emission as follows: (i) (A) For opacity as follows: (AA) (i) The actual percent opacity of all six (6) minute (block) averages exceeding the applicable opacity limit shall be reported. If the an exceedance occurs continuously beyond one (1) six (6) minute period, the percent opacity for each six (6) minute period or the highest six (6) minute average opacity for the entire period shall be reported. (BB) (ii) For department approved opacity averaging times other than six (6) minutes, the actual percent opacity of each averaging period in excess of the applicable limit shall be reported. (CC) (iii) A summary by cause shall be prepared and submitted as part of this report itemizing exceedances by cause. (ii) (B) For gaseous emissions, the excess emissions, in units of the applicable standard, must be reported based on the applicable averaging time, for example, one (1) hour block, three (3) hour block, three (3) hour rolling, in addition to any other reporting requirements that may be applicable. The averaging time is specified in the applicable federal or state rules, or facility in the operating permit for the emissions unit. (5) (4) Continuous monitoring system instrument downtime, except for zero (0) and span checks, which shall be reported separately, shall include the following: (A) Date of downtime. (B) Time of commencement. (C) Duration of each downtime. (D) Reasons for each downtime. (E) Nature of system repairs and adjustments.

(d) If there are no excess emissions or monitor downtime in a reporting period, the owner or operator of a emissions unit subject to this rule shall submit a report indicating that no excess emissions or downtime incidents occurred in the reporting period that includes the start and end dates of the time period. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 5- 7 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2071)

SECTION 11. 326 IAC 3- 5- 8 IS ADDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 5- 8 Operation and maintenance of continuous emission monitoring and continuous opacity Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 27monitoring systems

Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 8. (a) This section applies to the operation and maintenance of CEMS and COMS.

(b) The owner or operator of a CEMS or COMS required by federal or state regulations or permit shall: (1) install; (2) calibrate; (3) maintain; (4) operate; and (5) certify; such CEMS or COMS, and related equipment in accordance with applicable federal regulations, this rule, and any applicable permits.

(c) Except for periods when the: (1) affected emissions unit is not operating; (2) affected source or emissions unit is operating under a scenario that does not require CEMS or COMS; (3) CEMS or COMS is experiencing a malfunction; or (4) owner/operator is conducting CEMS or COMS quality assurance and quality control activities, including, but not limited to: (A) calibration checks; (B) zero and span adjustments; (C) calibration gas audits; or (D) other required quality assurance/quality control activities; all CEMS and COMS shall be in continuous operation.

(d) Except as otherwise provided by a rule or provided specifically in a permit, if a CEMS or COMS is malfunctioning or will be down for calibration, maintenance, or repairs for a period of twenty-four (24) hours or more, the owner or operator of the CEMS or COMS shall perform supplemental monitoring in accordance with the permit.

(e) The owner or operator of the CEMS or COMS shall do the following: (1) Keep records: (A) in accordance with section 6(b) of this rule; and (B) that describe the supplemental monitoring implemented during any downtime to assure compliance with applicable emission limitations. (2) Submit reports, as applicable, in accordance with section 7 of this rule. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 5- 8 )

SECTION 12. 326 IAC 3- 6- 1 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 6- 1 Applicability; test procedures Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 1. This rule applies to any facility emissions unit emissions testing performed to determine compliance with applicable emission limitations contained in this title, or for any other purpose requiring review and approval by the department. (such as an alternate emission factor determination). The owner or operator of an emissions unit shall conduct emission tests subject to this rule shall be conducted in accordance with any applicable procedures and analysis methods specified in 40 CFR 51*, 40 CFR 60*, 40 CFR 61*, 40 CFR 63*, 40 CFR 75*, or other procedures approved by the department and U.S. EPA. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 28*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing

Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 6- 1 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2072; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 36)

SECTION 13. 326 IAC 3- 6- 2 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 6- 2 Source sampling protocols Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 2. (a) When an emissions test is to be performed by any person other than the department, the source or emissions unit owner or operator shall complete a test protocol form and submit the test protocol form to the department not later than thirty-five (35) days prior to the intended test date unless more notice is required under the applicable program. Such rule requires additional notice. The test protocol shall: (1) be on a form approved by the department; or shall (2) contain information equivalent to that required on the form approved by the department. The department shall evaluate and approve the test protocol prior it to being implemented. If the department does not notify the owner or operator prior to the test date that the protocol has not been approved, the protocol is deemed approved.

(b) After evaluating the completed test protocol form, the department may: (1) inspect the test site; or (2) require additional conditions, including, but not limited to: (A) requiring reasonable modifications to the stack or duct to obtain acceptable test conditions; (B) requiring additional tests to allow for adverse conditions; such as interferences, nonsteady, or cyclic processes; (C) keeping process operating parameter records, operating logs, or charts during the test; (D) placing conditions on control equipment operation to make the operation of control equipment representative of normal operation; or (E) recording specified control equipment operating parameters during the test.

(c) If the department requires modification to: (1) test methods; (2) analytical methods; (3) operational parameters; or (4) other matters included in the emissions test protocol; the department shall notify the source or emissions unit owner or operator and the testing firm by letter or telephone not later than twenty-one (21) days prior to the test date.

(d) If the source or emissions unit owner or operator or test firm desires to make a minor change to previously submitted procedures or conditions, the department shall be notified of such the minor change as soon as practicable prior to the intended emissions test date. Such The minor changes shall not be made unless approved by the department prior to the emission test.

(e) Reasonable changes in the emissions test protocol that result from emergency conditions during the test shall be approved by the department if a department staff person is available at the test site, before the test may proceed.

(f) Post-test approval may be granted based on reasonable changes resulting from emergency or reasonably unforeseeable conditions during the test.

(g) The department reserves the right to conduct any portion of the reference method tests using equipment Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 29supplied by the department. Notice of acceptable test procedures shall be given to the owner or operator of the

source or emissions unit and its testing representative.

(h) The source or emissions unit owner or operator shall schedule an actual test date and time period and notify the department not later than fourteen (14) days prior to the actual test date. In the event that a previously scheduled test must be canceled and rescheduled, the owner or operator of the source or emissions unit shall notify the department no less than fourteen (14) days in advance of the rescheduled test date. Tests rescheduled for less than fourteen (14) days after notifying the department of the rescheduled test date must be approved by the department. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 6- 2 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2072)

SECTION 14. 326 IAC 3- 6- 3 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 6- 3 Emission testing Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 3. (a) Department staff may observe field test procedures and source or emissions unit operation during the emission test.

(b) The owner or operator of a source or emissions unit shall conduct all emission tests shall be conducted as follows: (1) While The facility emissions unit being tested is shall be operating according to clause (A) or (B), except as allowed under clause (C), as follows: (A) At a minimum, ninety-five percent (95%) to one hundred percent (100%) of its the permitted maximum emissions unit operating capacity description. (B) Under conditions of worst case emissions, and if the worst case emission condition is not known, then the worst case emission condition shall be assumed to be the maximum process or operating rate of the emissions unit as listed in the permit's emissions unit description. (C) Under other capacities or conditions as specified in an applicable requirement or approved by the department. As used in this clause, "capacity" means the design capacity of the emissions unit or other operating capacities agreed to by the owner or operator of the emissions unit and the department, including, but not limited to, process conditions when the department believes that changes in the operating capacities or operating conditions have the potential to affect emission levels. (2) Under conditions representative of normal operations. (3) Under other capacities or conditions specified and approved by the department. As used in this subdivision, "capacity" means the design capacity of the facility or other operating capacities agreed to by the

source and the department. (2) All test runs for a given pollutant shall be conducted within twenty-four (24) hours unless process variables or mandatory test lengths of greater than two (2) hours make this impracticable. In these cases, the testing shall be conducted on consecutive days. Other periods or duration may be approved by the commissioner.

(c) Facilities Emissions units subject to 326 IAC 12

, New Source Performance Standards, 326 IAC 14
, or 326 IAC 20 Hazardous Air Pollutants, shall be tested under conditions as specified in the applicable provision for that facility emissions unit in 40 CFR 60*, 40 CFR 61*, or 40 CFR 63* and this rule where appropriate.

(d) The owner or operator of a source or emissions unit shall make available at the test site calibration results of the various sampling components. The information shall include the following: (1) The date or dates the test was performed. (2) The methods used. (3) The calibration data. (4) The results. All components requiring calibration shall be calibrated within sixty (60) days prior to the actual test date. Post-test calibrations shall be performed on the components not later than forty-five (45) days after the actual test date. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 30Components requiring calibration are listed in the federal test methods specified in section 5 of this rule.

(e) The department may perform or require the performance of audits of equipment or procedures associated with the test series up to the time of the actual performance of the test, between test runs, or following the test series. The department reserves the right to perform or observe all associated analyses.

(f) The original or a photocopy of the raw field data generated during the test series shall be provided to the department observer upon request if such the request may be reasonably met under the existing circumstances.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 6- 3; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2073; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 37)

SECTION 15. 326 IAC 3- 6- 4 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 6- 4 Reporting Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 4. (a) All emission tests for which a test protocol form was submitted pursuant to the department under section 2 of this rule shall be reported to the department in the form of an emission test report containing the following information: (1) The reported testing methods and results certified as true and accurate and in compliance with this rule by the person responsible for conducting the emissions test. (2) Information regarding the test, including the following: (A) A stack test result summary table that compares the measured emissions, in units consistent with the applicable emissions limitations, to the emissions limitations. (A) (B) A description of the facility or facilities emissions unit or units being tested. (B) (C) The date or dates on which the test was performed. (C) (D) The type of tests conducted. (D) (E) The type of process and control equipment utilized. (E) (F) The source name and location. (F) (G) The purpose of the tests. (G) (H) The test participants and their titles. (3) Tabulated data and results, including the following: (A) The process weight rate or heat input rate. (B) The referenced or derived conversion factors. (C) The stack gas flow rate. (D) Measured emissions given in units consistent with the applicable emission limitations. (E) The average value of emissions from any continuous gaseous emissions monitoring system in units consistent with the applicable emission limitations if applicable to the pollutant being tested. (E) (F) If applicable, visible emissions observations or six (6) minute average continuous opacity monitor readings. (F) Average value of emissions from any continuous gaseous emissions monitoring system in units consistent with the applicable emission limitations if applicable to the pollutant being tested. (4) A description of process and control devices, including the following: (A) A process flow diagram. (B) The maximum design capacities. (C) A fuel analysis and heat value for heat input rate determinations. (D) The process and control equipment operating conditions. (E) A discussion of variations from normal plant operations. (F) The stack height. (G) The exit diameter. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 31(H) The volumetric flow rate (cubic feet per minute).

(I) The exit temperature. (J) The exit velocity. (5) A description of sampling methods used, including the following: (A) A brief discussion of the analytical procedures with justifications for any variance from reference method procedures. (B) Specification of the following: (i) The number of sampling points. (ii) The time per point. (iii) The total sampling time per run. (C) A cross-sectional diagram of the sampling site showing sampling points. (D) A diagram showing the following: (i) The stack dimensions. (ii) The sampling location. (iii) The distance from the nearest flow disturbance upstream and downstream of the sampling points. (iv) The diagram of the sampling train. (6) Sampling and analytical procedures used, including the following: (A) Results and calculations, including the following: (i) Units consistent with the applicable emission limitation. (ii) One (1) complete calculation using actual data for each type of test performed. (iii) Raw production data signed by the source official. (iv) Photocopies of all actual field data. (B) A laboratory report, including the following: (i) The chain of custody. (ii) Copies of all calibration data for equipment used in sampling as described in section 3(d) of this rule. (C) Applicable rules and regulations showing the emission limitations. (D) For particulate matter tests, If applicable, copies of visible emissions evaluations or opacity monitor readings. (E) Copies of any continuous gaseous emissions monitoring system readings for gaseous pollutant tests.

(b) The owner or operator of a source or emissions unit shall submit all emission test reports must be received by to the department not later than forty-five (45) days after the completion of the testing. An extension may be granted by the department if the owner or operator of the source or emissions unit submits to the department a reasonable written explanation for the requested extension not later than five (5) days prior to the end of the initial forty-five (45) day period. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 6- 4 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2073)

SECTION 16. 326 IAC 3- 6- 5 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 6- 5 Specific testing procedures; particulate matter; PM 10 ; PM 2.5 ; sulfur dioxide; nitrogen oxides; volatile organic compounds Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 5. (a) Tests for particulate matter tests (PM), PM 10 , and PM 2.5 shall be conducted in accordance with the following procedures: (1) For PM: 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 5*, 5A*, 5B*, 5C*, 5D*, 5E*, or 5F*, or Method 17*, as applicable, or other procedures approved by the department and U.S. EPA. (2) For PM 10 and PM 2.5 : 40 CFR 51, Appendix M, Method 201* or 201A*, and 202*. The measurement of condensible PM 10 using the procedures described in Method 202* is not required if the applicable emission limitation is contained at 326 IAC 6.8- 2 , unless otherwise specified by 326 IAC 6.5 or 326 IAC 6.8 . 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 5*, in conjunction with Method 202*, may also be used, subject to the approval of the department and U.S. EPA. Other procedures to measure PM 10 and PM 2.5 may be approved by the department and U.S. EPA. (2) (3) Visible emissions (VE) evaluations shall be performed in conjunction with a particulate emissions PM, PM 10 , PM 2.5 , or other mass emission rate test of air pollutants, as required by the department. The VE evaluations shall be conducted by a qualified observer in accordance with the procedures contained in 326 Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 32IAC 5- 1- 4 . VE readings shall be continuously recorded for at least thirty (30) minutes per hour of sampling time

for each sampling repetition, unless a longer time is otherwise mandated by federal regulation. A waiver from this requirement may be granted by the on-site department staff person or on-site department staff person if adverse conditions exist that would invalidate the VE readings. Waivers from this requirement may be granted by the department for emissions units operating with a PM CEMS. Complete waivers from the requirement to conduct VE readings during a compliance test may not be granted to facilities for the emissions unit required to complete opacity testing pursuant to 40 CFR 60.8* or 40 CFR 63. Facilities Emissions units equipped with continuous opacity monitors may submit the six (6) minute integrated readings of such the monitors during the sampling period, instead of performing VE evaluations, provided: (A) the monitoring system meets the performance specifications as specified in 40 CFR 60, Appendix B*, and is, or will be, certified by the department; and (B) the monitor readings submitted with the test include a zero (0) and upscale calibration check before the first test run and following the end of the final run; and (C) if more than one (1) day of testing is required to complete the three (3) runs, the zero (0) and span checks shall be performed at the beginning of each day's testing and at the conclusion of each day's final run. (3) (4) At least three (3) repetitions of the test shall be performed under consistent facility emissions unit operating conditions unless otherwise allowed by the department. For boiler emissions testing, at least one (1) of the three (3) repetitions shall be conducted during a normal sootblowing cycle that is consistent with frequency and duration normally experienced. (4) (5) At Richmond Power and Light's Whitewater Generating Station, when sootblowing occurs during one (1) of the three (3) repetitions, emission test results shall be evaluated using either a time weighted averaging period (TWAP) or a straight averaging technique. When using TWAP, the following equation shall be used to ensure proper weighting of an intermittent cleaning cycle performance test run regardless of the length of the cleaning cycle and regardless of the number and duration of the test runs made on the unit. When using TWAP, the representative pounds per hour of particulate emissions shall be calculated using the following equation:

Where: E = Pounds per hour of particulate emissions.

E
cc = Average E of sample containing cleaning cycle.

E
ncc = Average E of sample containing no cleaning cycle. A = Hours of cleaning cycle operation during sample. B = Hours with no cleaning cycle operation during sample. R = Average hours of operation per twenty-four (24) hours. S = Average hours of cleaning cycle operation per twenty-four (24) hours. (5) (6) Only those fuels representative of normal fuel quality used during normal operations shall be combusted. (6) (7) During each repetition, each sampling point shall be sampled for a minimum of two (2) minutes. (7) (8) The total test time per repetition shall be no less than sixty (60) minutes. (8) (9) The total sample volume per repetition shall be no less than thirty (30) dry standard cubic feet (dscf). (9) (10) The total particulate weight collected from the sampling nozzle, probe, cyclone (if used), filter holder (front half), filter, and connecting glassware, and, if required in subdivision (2), the impinger catch, shall be reported to the department and U.S. EPA. Particulate analysis of the impinger catch is not required, unless specified by the department.

(b) The owner or operator shall conduct sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) tests shall be conducted in accordance with the following procedures: (1) 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6*, 6A*, or 6C*, or 8*, as applicable, or other procedures approved by the department and U.S. EPA. (2) At least three (3) repetitions of two (2) samples, each according to 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6* or 6A*, or 6C*, or three (3) repetitions according to 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6C* or 8*, performed under identical facility emissions unit operating conditions, shall constitute a test. For boiler emissions testing, only those fuels representative of fuel quality during normal operations shall be combusted. (3) During each of the repetitions for 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 8*, each sampling point shall be Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 33sampled for a minimum of two (2) minutes.

(4) (3) The total test time per repetition shall be as follows: (A) For tests using 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6* or 6A*, or 6C*, a minimum of twenty (20) minutes per run with a thirty (30) minute interval between each run. (B) For tests using 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6C*, a minimum of sixty (60) minutes per run. (B) (C) For tests using 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 8*, a minimum of sixty (60) minutes per run, with the following criteria: (i) During each of the repetitions, each sampling point shall be sampled for a minimum of two (2) minutes. (5) (ii) The total sample volume per repetition under 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 8*, shall be no less than forty (40) dry standard cubic feet (dscf). (iii) During each of the repetitions, the sample rate shall not exceed one (1) cubic foot per minute (cfm).

(c) The owner or operator shall conduct nitrogen oxide (NO

x ) tests shall be conducted according to the following procedures: (1) 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 7*, 7A*, 7B*, 7C*, or 7E*, as applicable, or other procedures approved by the department and U.S. EPA. (2) For Methods 7*, 7A*, 7B*, or 7C*, at least three (3) repetitions of four (4) samples each shall constitute a test. (3) For Method 7E*, three (3) test runs, each a minimum of sixty (60) minutes, shall constitute a test.

(d) The owner or operator shall conduct volatile organic compounds (VOC) emissions tests shall be conducted in accordance with the following procedures: (1) 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 25*, or other procedures approved by the department and U.S. EPA, shall be used for the total nonmethane organic emissions. (2) At least three (3) samples shall be collected and analyzed. (3) The total test time per repetition shall be a minimum of sixty (60) minutes. (4) Bulk gasoline terminals subject to 326 IAC 20- 10 shall be tested in accordance with 40 CFR 63, Subpart R*. All other bulk gasoline terminals shall be tested in accordance with the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) at 40 CFR 60, Subpart XX*. During all compliance tests, 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 21* shall be used for determining whether there are any leaks from the hatches or flanges of the gasoline transports. If any leak is detected, the transport shall not be used for the capacity of the compliance test of the bulk gasoline terminal. The threshold for leaks shall be as follows: (A) Five hundred (500) parts per million methane for all bulk gasoline terminals subject to 40 CFR 63, Subpart R*. (B) Ten thousand (10,000) parts per million (as methane) for all bulk gasoline terminals subject to 40 CFR 60, Subpart XX* and for all other bulk gasoline terminals.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 6- 5 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2074; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 37)

SECTION 17. 326 IAC 3- 6- 6 IS ADDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 6- 6 Test invalidation Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 6. Based on the department's evaluation, any test series or test run may be considered invalid or unacceptable for any of the following reasons: (1) Failure to do any of the following: Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 34(A) Follow the approved protocol and adhere to any procedure or requirement of the approved

method or other protocol conditions approved or required by the department. (B) Demonstrate or comply with reference methods' quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) requirements. (C) Provide or report the required data in order for the department to complete the review of the test conditions, specifications, and results. (2) Use of nonrepresentative process or operating conditions or control device operation. (3) Observation of fugitive emissions from the emissions unit or associated capture or control system being tested by the department or authorized representative. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 6- 6 )

SECTION 18. 326 IAC 3- 7- 1 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 7- 1 Applicability Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 1. This rule applies to fuel sampling and analysis that is performed to determine compliance with the emission limitations specified in 326 IAC 7

. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 7- 1 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2075; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477)

SECTION 19. 326 IAC 3- 7- 2 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 7- 2 Coal sampling and analysis methods Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 2. (a) Owners or operators of coal sampling systems for sources with total coal-fired capacity greater than or equal to one thousand five hundred (1,500) million British thermal units (Btus) (Btu) per hour actual heat input shall follow procedures specified in ASTM D2234-89*, "Standard Methods for Collection of a Gross Sample of Coal", unless otherwise provided in section 3 of this rule. Additionally, the coal sampling system shall meet the following requirements: (1) The coal sample acquisition point shall be at a location where representative samples of the total coal flow to be combusted by the facility or facilities emissions unit may be obtained. A single as-bunkered sampling station may be used to represent the coal to be combusted by multiple facilities emissions units using the same stockpile feed system. (2) The increment collection method to be used is specified in ASTM D2234-89*, Table 1, I-A-1, I-B-1, or I-C-1. (3) The opening of the sampling device shall be at least two and one-half (2.5) times the top-size of the coal and not less than one and one-fourth (1.25) inches. (4) The sampling device shall have sufficient capacity to completely retain or entirely pass the increment without loss or spillage. (5) The velocity with which the cross-stream cutting instrument travels through the stream shall not exceed eighteen (18) inches per second. The velocity requirement shall not apply to a swing-arm sampler or to a sampler whose cutter opening is perpendicular to the stream of coal. Owners or operators of all coal sampling systems shall detail the proper operating procedures in the standard operating procedures document required under section 5 of this rule. (6) Increments obtained during the sampling period shall be protected from changes in composition to maintain the integrity of constituent characteristics required to convert sample sulfur content to units of the applicable emission standard. (7) A comparison of weight or volume of collected sample with that of the total flow of coal shall be conducted at a minimum of one (1) time every two (2) weeks to assure a constant sampling ratio is maintained for increments composited into a sample representing a single twenty-four (24) hour period. (8) A routine inspection of the sampling system shall be established to meet requirements and guidelines Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 35specified in ASTM D4702-87*, "Guide for Inspecting Mechanical Coal Sampling Systems that Use Cross-Cut

Sample Cutters for Conformance with Current ASTM Methods". (9) Composite samples shall be collected for analysis at a minimum of one (1) time per twenty-four (24) hour period.

(b) Owners or operators of coal sampling systems for sources with total coal-fired capacity between one hundred (100) and one thousand five hundred (1,500) million Btus Btu per hour actual heat input shall comply with requirements: specified as follows: (1) in subsection (a); (2) in section 3 of this rule; or (3) shall meet the following minimum requirements: (A) The coal sample acquisition point shall be at a location where representative samples of the total coal flow to be combusted by the facility or facilities emissions unit may be obtained. A single as-bunkered or as-burned sampling station may be used to represent the coal to be combusted by multiple facilities emissions units using the same stockpile feed system. (B) Coal shall be sampled at least three (3) times per day and at least one (1) time per eight (8) hour period unless no coal is bunkered during the preceding eight (8) hour period. (C) Minimum sample size shall be five hundred (500) grams. (D) Samples shall be composited and analyzed at the end of each calendar month.

(c) Coal samples shall be prepared for analysis in accordance with procedures specified in ASTM D2013-86*, "Standard Method of Preparing Coal Samples for Analysis". The preparation of samples shall meet the following requirements: (1) Samples shall be prepared in accordance with ASTM D2013-86*, Procedure A or Procedure B. (2) Sample preparation shall be checked at weekly intervals by performing a split sample of the twenty-four (24) hour composite sample and preparing and analyzing these two (2) identically.

(d) The heat content of coal samples shall be determined in accordance with procedures specified in ASTM D2015-95*, "Standard Test Method for Gross Calorific Value of Solid Fuel by the Adiabatic Bomb Calorimeter", or ASTM D3286-91A*, "Standard Test Method for Gross Calorific Value of Coal and Coke by the Isothermal Jacket Bomb Calorimeter". Restandardization requirements in Section 11 of both methods shall be followed. Precision requirements for repeatability shall be verified according to Section 16.1.1 of both methods at a minimum of once per week.

(e) The sulfur content of coal samples shall be determined according to procedures specified in ASTM D3177-89*, "Standard Test Methods for Total Sulfur in the Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke", or ASTM D4239-94*, "Standard Test Methods for Sulfur in the Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke Using High Temperature Tube Furnace Combustion Methods". Precision requirements for repeatability shall be verified according to ASTM D3177-89*, Section 13, or ASTM D4239-94, Section 18*, at a minimum of one (1) time per week. The laboratory that performs the analysis shall participate in an interlaboratory audit program using coal samples supplied by the department.

(f) Compliance with this section is required unless a source owner or operator demonstrates to The department that may approve minor modifications to the coal sampling and analysis procedures at a source upon demonstration by the source owner or operator that the minor modifications are necessary to meet the requirements of this section.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 7- 2 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2075; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 38)

SECTION 20. 326 IAC 3- 7- 3 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 7- 3 Alternative coal sampling and analysis methods Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 36Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11

Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 3. (a) As an alternative to the coal sampling and analysis procedures in section 2 of this rule, a source owner or operator may use manual or other non-ASTM automatic sampling and analysis procedures upon a demonstration as described in subsection (b), submitted to and approved by the department for approval, and U.S. EPA that such the procedures provide sulfur dioxide emission estimates representative either of estimates based on coal sampling and analysis procedures specified in section 2 of this rule or of continuous emissions monitoring. The demonstration shall consist of one (1) or more of the following methods:

(1) (b) For the demonstration described in this section, a source owner or operator may submit documentation of procedures and results of a stopped-belt bias test or other comparisons between a sampling system meeting the requirements of section 2 of this rule and those methods and procedures proposed by the source owner or operator. A stopped-belt bias test and a sampling system meeting the requirements of section 2 of this rule shall be considered reference method systems. A comparison shall utilize a series of at least twenty-five (25) reference method system samples paired with nonreference method system samples and analyzed for the percent of sulfur content to determine the presence of significant systemic error. The detection of significant systemic error shall be based on the application of a statistical test (t-test) to determine if there is a difference between the reference and nonreference systems at the ninety-five percent (95%) confidence level, according to the following formula:

Where: t = Calculated t value.

d = Average difference between paired data. Sd = Standard deviation of the differences. N = Number of paired data sets. The calculated t value is compared to the t value in the standard statistical t tables at the ninety-five percent (95%) probability and the appropriate degrees of freedom (n - 1). If the calculated t value is greater than or equal to the value of t in the t table, then the systems are not comparable. Certain coals with low variability may detect a small bias, which may be acceptable as decided on a case-by-case basis. This method tests for positive and negative bias. Provisions for testing only for a negative bias that would cause a source owner or operator to report less than actual values may be acceptable if supported by statistical tests. Upon request, the department shall provide written guidance to a source owner or operator as to the procedures to be followed in conducting this comparison. (2) Other procedures may be acceptable if submitted to the department for approval and the department approves.

(b) (c) The demonstration provided described in subsection (a) this section shall be repeated upon any significant change to the coal sampling procedures or upon notification by the department that a new demonstration is necessary. If the department has reason to doubt that the alternative sampling and analysis procedures are comparable to methods and procedures provided in section 2 of this rule, based on: (1) inspections; (2) monitoring; (3) quality assurance data; or (4) other information; the department may notify the owner or operator that the demonstration shall be repeated. Written notification by the department of the request shall be made to the source owner or operator allowing at least sixty (60) days to schedule the demonstration. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 7- 3; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2077; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477)

SECTION 21. 326 IAC 3- 7- 4 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 7- 4 Fuel oil sampling; analysis methods Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 37Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11

Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 4. (a) The source owner or operator shall perform sampling and analysis of the sulfur content of fuel oil shall be performed in accordance with the following ASTM procedures: (1) Collection of fuel oil samples shall be conducted according to either of the following: (A) ASTM D4057-88*, "Standard Practice for Manual Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum Products". (B) ASTM D4177-82*, "Standard Method for Automatic Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum Products". (2) Determination of sulfur content shall be conducted according to any of the following: (A) ASTM D129-95*, "Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Products (General Bomb Method)". (B) ASTM D1266-91*, "Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Products (Lamp Method)". (C) ASTM D1552-95*, "Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Products (High-Temperature Method)". (D) ASTM D2622-94*, "Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Products (X-Ray Spectrographic Method)". (3) Determination of heat content shall be conducted according to ASTM D240-92*, "Standard Test Method for Heat of Combustion of Liquid Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb Calorimeter".

(b) An A source owner or operator may, with the prior written approval of the department and U.S. EPA, modify the procedures specified in subsection (a), use alternate equivalent procedures, or rely upon equivalent sampling and analysis procedures performed by the vendor prior to delivery of the fuel oil to the owner or operator.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 7- 4 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2077; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35 p.m.: 26 IR 1567; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 40)

SECTION 22. 326 IAC 3- 7- 5 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 3- 7- 5 Record keeping requirements; standard operating procedures Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 4- 3 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 5. (a) Owners or operators of sources with total coal-fired capacity greater than or equal to one hundred (100) million British thermal units per hour actual heat input shall develop a standard operating procedure (SOP) to be followed for: (1) sampling; (2) handling; (3) analysis; (4) quality control; (5) quality assurance; and (6) data reporting of the information collected pursuant to under sections 2 through 4 of this rule. In addition, any revision to the SOP shall be submitted to maintained by the source and made available upon request by the department.

(b) Owner or operators of emissions units using CEMS for compliance that do not use coal sampling and analysis as a backup when the CEM is not in use do not need to have a SOP.

(b) (c) The owner or operator of a source or emissions unit subject to this rule shall maintain records sufficient to verify compliance with the procedures specified in sections 2 through 4 of this rule. Records shall be: (1) maintained for a period of five (5) years; and shall be (2) made available upon request by the department. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 38The department may at any time perform a systems audit to determine compliance with the requirements in

sections 2 through 4 of this rule. Audit procedures shall be submitted to the owner or operator of a fuel sampling and analysis system subject to audit prior to conducting such the audit. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 3- 7- 5 ; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2078; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477)

SECTION 23. 326 IAC 7- 2- 1 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

326 IAC 7- 2- 1 Reporting requirements; methods to determine compliance Authority: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 4 ; IC 13- 17- 3- 11 Affected: IC 13- 14- 8 ; IC 13- 15 ; IC 13- 17

Sec. 1. (a) As used in this article, "weighting factor" means the daily quantity of coal bunkered or megawatt generation or other appropriate measure of the output of a combustion source.

(b) As used in this article, "rolling weighted average sulfur dioxide emission rate" means the summation of the average sulfur dioxide emission rate times the daily weighting factor divided by the summation of the weighting factors.

(c) Owners or operators of sources or emissions units subject to 326 IAC 7- 1.1

, 326 IAC 7- 4 , or 326 IAC 7- 4.1 shall submit to the commissioner the following reports based on fuel sampling and analysis data obtained in accordance with procedures specified under 326 IAC 3- 7: (1) Fuel combustion sources with total coal-fired heat input capacity greater than or equal to one thousand five hundred (1,500) million British thermal units (MMBtu) per hour shall submit quarterly reports of the thirty (30) day rolling weighted average sulfur dioxide emission rate in pounds per MMBtu. Records of the daily average coal sulfur content, coal heat content, weighting factor, and daily average sulfur dioxide emission rate in pounds per MMBtu shall be submitted to the department in the quarterly report and maintained by the source owner or operator for a period of at least two (2) years. (2) Fuel combustion sources with total coal-fired heat input capacity greater than one hundred (100) and less than one thousand five hundred (1,500) MMBtu per hour shall submit quarterly reports of the calendar month average coal sulfur content, coal heat content, and sulfur dioxide emission rate in pounds per MMBtu and the total monthly coal consumption. (3) All other fuel combustion sources shall submit reports of calendar month average sulfur content, heat content, fuel consumption, and sulfur dioxide emission rate in pounds per MMBtu upon request.

(d) Compliance or noncompliance with the emission limitations contained in 326 IAC 7- 1.1

, 326 IAC 7- 4

, or 326 IAC 7- 4.1 may be determined by a stack test conducted in accordance with 326 IAC 3- 6 utilizing procedures outlined in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6*, 6A*, 6C*, or 8*.

(e) (d) Fuel sampling and analysis data shall be collected pursuant to the procedures specified in 326 IAC 3- 7- 2 or 326 IAC 3- 7- 3 for coal combustion or 326 IAC 3- 7- 4 for oil combustion. and these data may be used to determine compliance or noncompliance with the emission limitations contained in 326 IAC 7- 1.1

, 326 IAC 7- 4

, or 326 IAC 7- 4.1 . Computation of calculated sulfur dioxide emission rates from fuel sampling and analysis data shall be based on the emission factors contained in U.S. EPA publication AP-42* unless other emission factors based on site-specific sulfur dioxide measurements are approved by the commissioner and the U.S. EPA. Fuel sampling and analysis data shall be collected as follows: (1) For coal-fired fuel combustion sources with heat input capacity greater than or equal to one thousand five hundred (1,500) MMBtu per hour, compliance or noncompliance shall be determined using a thirty (30) day rolling weighted average sulfur dioxide emission rate in pounds per MMBtu unless a shorter averaging time or alternate averaging methodology is specified for a source under this article. (2) For all other combustion sources, compliance or noncompliance shall be determined using a calendar month average sulfur dioxide emission rate in pounds per MMBtu unless a shorter averaging time or alternate averaging methodology is specified for a source under this article.

(f) A determination of noncompliance under either the method specified in subsection (d) or (e) shall not be refuted by evidence of compliance under the other method. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 39(g) Upon written notification of an emissions unit owner or operator to the department, (e) Subsection (c)

does not apply when continuous emission monitoring data collected and reported under 326 IAC 3- 5 may be is used as the means for determining compliance with the emission limitations in this article. Upon such notification, the other requirements of this rule shall not apply.

(f) Compliance or noncompliance with the emission limitations contained in 326 IAC 7- 1.1 or 326 IAC 7- 4 may be determined by an appropriate method as follows: (1) A stack test conducted in accordance with 326 IAC 3- 6 using procedures in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6*, 6A*, 6C*, or 8*. (2) A continuous emission monitoring system in accordance with 326 IAC 3- 5

. (3) Source sampling in accordance with 326 IAC 3- 6

. (4) Fuel sampling and analysis data collected in accordance with subsection (d) or 326 IAC 3- 7

. (5) Other methods approved by the commissioner and U.S. EPA.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401 or are available for review and copying at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 IAC 7- 2- 1 ; filed Aug 28, 1990, 4:50 p.m.: 14 IR 52; filed Jan 30, 1998, 4:00 p.m.: 21 IR 2078; errata filed Feb 9, 1999, 4:06 p.m.: 22 IR 2006; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20 p.m.: 24 IR 1477; errata filed Nov 7, 2001, 3:00 p.m.: 25 IR 813; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:30 p.m.: 26 IR 1565; filed Aug 26, 2004, 11:30 a.m.: 28 IR 42; filed May 25, 2005, 10:50 a.m.: 28 IR 2953)

Notice of Public Hearing

Posted: 01/19/2011 by Legislative Services Agency An html version of this document. Indiana Register

Date: Sep 24,2013 10:14:52AM EDT DIN: 20110119-IR-326050330PRA Page 40

# A PPENDIX 

# Hrc3 #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

1 

### TITLE 326 AIR POLLUTIO N CONTROL BOARD

LSA Document #05-330

SUMMARY/RESPONSE TO COMMENT S FROM THE THIRD COMMENT PERIOD The Indiana Department of Environmen tal Management (IDEM) requested public comment from January 19, 2011, through February 9, 2011, on IDEM's draft rule language. IDEM received comments from the following parties:

Indianapolis Power and Light Company (IPL) Bingham McHale (CASE Coalition) (BM) Indiana Energy Association/Indiana Utility Group (IUG)

Following is a summary of the comments received and IDEM's responses thereto.

Comment: The requirements in 326 IAC 3 set fort h the monitoring requirements for sources regulated under Indiana law. The defi nition of “emission limitation or standard” at 326 IAC 3-4-1(6) should refere nce “any applicable requirement contained in this Title” rather than “under the CAA.” The state monito ring rules cannot regula te the monitoring and reporting of federal emission limitation and standa rds that have not been incorporated into Indiana law. (BM) Comment: If the definition of “emission limitatio n or standard” is not revised to restrict it to the applicable requirements included in Title 326, th e proposed definition of “exceedance” needs to be revised to state “Any applicable emission limitation or standard contained in this Title...” (BM) Comment: If the definition of “emission limitatio n or standard” is not amended to restrict it to the applicable requirements included in Title 326 then 326 IAC 3-5-1 must limit applicability “to the extent to determine comp liance with an emission limitation or standard contained in this Title.” (BM) Response: IDEM revised the proposed rule for fi nal adoption as suggested, therefore the definition of “exceedance” does not need to be revised.

Comment: The listed sources included in 326 IAC 3-5-1(a)(2) though (8) may also be subject to Parts 61 and 63. Did ID EM intend to leave these listed sources and those subject to 326 IAC 12 subject to both sets of provisions? A dditionally, is IDEM trying to regulate listed sources subject to a federal sta ndard prior to the standard bein g adopted in Indiana law? Did IDEM intend to delete the parenthetical in 326 IAC 3-5-1(a)(1) which read “which incorporates by reference the re quirements of 40 CFR 60”? (BM) Response: IDEM intended to leave the listed so urces and those subject to 326 IAC 12 subject to both sets of provisions. The requireme nts in the state rule are very similar to the requirements in 40 CFR Part 60 and do not pose as many conflicts as they do with 40 CFR Part 63. IDEM is not trying to regulate sources subject to federal standards prior to the standard being adopted in Indiana law. The re ference is to emission units subject to 326 IAC 12, not 40 CFR Part 60. IDEM intended to delete the parenthetical in 326 IAC 3-5-1(a)(1) because it was additional language descri bing 326 IAC 12 that is not needed.rc3 #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

2 

### Comment: Review of 326 IAC 3-5-3 and the IDEM Compliance Branch Continuous Monitoring Guidance as compared to the contin uous monitor certificatio n and recertification requirements under 40 CFR 75.20 revealed incons istency between the IDEM notification requirements (35 days prior to recertificati on per 326 IAC 3-5-3(2)(B )) and the Part 75 recertification dead lines (720 unit operating hours per 40 CFR 75.20(b)(3)(iv)(B)). This inconsistency should be corrected by modifying the deadline in 326 IAC 3-5-3(2)(B) to be consistent with the Part 75 notificati on deadlines at 40 CFR 75.61(a)(1). (BM) Response: If an emission unit is subject to both rules then compliance with both rules is required. The state rule requires additiona l time because the federal government does not necessarily review and observe the testing.

Comment: IDEM should include repairs on the list of exceptions to when a continuous emission monitoring system (CEMS) or continuous opacity monitoring system (COMS) must be in operati on at 326 IAC 3-5-8(c). (BM) Response: IDEM revised the proposed rule for fi nal adoption to include repairs on the list of exceptions. Sources should still be awar e that downtime due to repairs is still counted against a source in terms of da ta validity requirements.

Comment: Provide a justification for adding th e word “minor” before “change” to create an undefined term “minor change” fo r source sampling protocol s at 326 IAC 3-6-2(d). The existing rule already requires that source s obtain approval prior to making the change. (BM) Response: IDEM revised the proposed rule for final adoption to delete the word “minor”. As the commenter points out the term “minor” is not necessary since the rule already requires that sources obtain approval prior to making the change.

Comment: IDEM has not demonstrated a need for the changes to emission testing at 326 IAC 3-6-3 and test invalid ation at 326 IAC 3-6-6. (BM) Response: IDEM has discussed this issue extens ively with affected parties during outreach meetings for this rulemaking. IDEM has explained that the current “normal” conditions language is troublesome. The proposed language requires sources to test at worst case conditions because for some sources ope rating at less than 95% of the operating capacity produces more emissions. The proposed language also allows other capacities or conditions as approved by the department. IDEM agrees to take out the test invalidation language at 326 IAC 3-6-6. Even though IDEM f eels it is useful for the rule to provide examples of the most common reasons a test may be invalidated, IDEM deleted this provision in the proposed rule for final adopt ion since IDEM still has the authority to invalidate tests for the reasons mentioned.

Comment: This rule should not automatically di scredit a stack test that took over 24 or 48 hours to conduct. (BM) Comment: The proposed rule language is incons istent with IDEM’s response to comments whereby IDEM said that it would ch ange the deadline to 48 hours at 326 IAC 3-6- 3(b)(2). (BM) (IUG) Response: IDEM corrected the proposed rule fo r final adoption to reflect the change in the deadline to 48 hours. The rule allows fo r other periods or durati ons to be approved by the Commissioner.rc3 #05-330 Compliance Monitoring May 4, 2011

3 

### Comment: The proposed changes to 326 IAC 3-6- 5(a)(10) requires that the total particulate weight collected be reported to IDEM and U. S. EPA. U.S. EPA should be removed as this data does not need to be submitted to U.S. EPA. (IPL) Response: IDEM revised the proposed rule for fina l adoption as requested. Test data results do not need to be submitted to U. S. EPA.

Comment: The proposed changes to 326 IAC 3- 6-5(a)(3) would require visible emissions (VE) evaluation testing during stack tests for particulate matter (PM) and PM 10 

### as well as for “other mass emission rate testing, as required by the departme nt.” In addition, if adverse conditions exist when the testing is be ing conducted or if a PM CEMS is operated, a waiver from the VE notation would have to be obtained by the depa rtment. IDEM should revise the proposed language to include an exemption from the VE notation requirement when operating a certified PM CEMS. (IPL) Comment: The rule at 326 IAC 3-6-5(a)(3) should state: “VE readings are not required for units equipped with a PM CEMS , except to the extent the emission unit is required to complete opacity testing pursuant to 40 CFR 60.8 or 40 CFR 63 as incorporated by reference by 326 IAC 12 and 20.” (BM) Response: IDEM revised the proposed rule for final adoption to include an exemption from the VE notation requirement when operatin g a certified PM CEMS. If another federal or state rule requires VE readi ngs then that requirement woul d still apply. Additionally, for sources with certified PM CEMS, annual pa rticulate sampling woul d now consist of a relative accuracy test audit (RATA) on the CEMS so the requirement to conduct VE readings during a performance test would no longer apply. The PM sampling is now part of an audit and not a performance test.

Comment: The phrase “unless a longer time is otherwise mandated by federal regulation” at 326 IAC 3-6-5(a )(3) should be deleted. If a federal regulation requires a longer VE reading period, then the source will have to comply with the federal regulation pursuant to the federal law and this provisi on will not be applicable. If the federal requirement is adopted into state law and ID EM wants to clarify that the longer period applies, then the proposed rule should be revi sed to state: “unless a longer time is otherwise mandated in this Title.” (BM) Response: IDEM did not revise the language as suggested. The provision clarifies that more stringent federal requirem ents may supercede the state rule.

Comment: The commenter requests that the final rule reflect a 45 day submittal time frame for RATAs at 326 IAC 3-5-5(f). (IUG) Response: IDEM revised the rule proposed for final adoption as suggested.

# A PPENDIX 

# I

### ADMINISTRATIVE CHECKLIST 

### (40 CFR 51, Appendix V)



### 1. The submittal is accompanied by a formal letter of submittal from the governor or his designee. Enclosed

2. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code Attachment B

or body of regulations; or issued the permit, order, consent agreement {"document"); in final form.

a. Date of adoption or final issuance:

b. The effective date of the plan, if different from the adoption/issuance date.



### 3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority under state law to adopt and implement the plan.

4. A copy of the actual regulation or document submitted for approval and incorporation by reference into the plan, including the following:

a. Indication of the changes made to the existing approved**plan.~ere** 

### applicable.

. 

# -

b. The submittal shall be a copy of the official State regulation or document signed, stamped, dated by the appropriate state official indicating that it is fully enforceable by the State. Effective date shall be stated in the document itself.

5. Evidence that the State followed all of the procedural requirements of the State's laws and constitution in conducting and completing the adoption/issuance of the plan. Date of adoption (May 4, 2011)

30 

### days after filing (September 10, 2011)

IC 13-14-8

Attachment A

Attachment B

6. Evidence that public notice was given, including date of Attachment D proof of publication. _X_ Notice of First Public Hearing and Publisher's Affidavits _X_ Notice of Second Public Hearing and Publisher's Affidavits

7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance with information provided in public hearing notice. _X_ Transcript from First Public Hearing _X_ Transcript from Second Public Hearing Attachments E and F

8. Compilation of public comments and State's response. Attachments G and H _X_ Response to comments from Second Notice _X_ Proposed Rule _X_ Response to comments from Third Comment Period

9. Technical Support Document (if source specific change). N/A 

## i.

I