alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2907. Allocation of funds for administration and reimbursement of States

#### (a) In general

The total amount appropriated pursuant to section 2910 of this title for any fiscal year shall be available for administration and for allocation among the States as provided in this section.

#### (b) Allocation formula

Of the total amount appropriated for any fiscal year pursuant to section 2910 of this title—

(1) the Secretary shall deduct so much, but not to exceed 8 percent thereof, as may be necessary for administering during such fiscal year the provisions of this chapter relating to the purposes for which so appropriated;

(2) less the deduction under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall allocate—

(A) for the District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico each a sum equal to not more than one-half of 1 percent of such amount; and

(B) for Guam, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands each a sum equal to not more than one-sixth of 1 percent of such amount; and

(3) less the deduction under paragraph (1) and the sums allocated under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall allocate for each of the States (other than those provided for in paragraph (2)) a sum—

(A) one-third of which is based on the ratio to which the area of such State bears to the total area of all such States, and

(B) two-thirds of which is based on the ratio to which the population of such State bears to the total population of all such States,

except all sums allocated under this paragraph shall be adjusted equitably so that no State shall be allocated a sum which is less than one-half of 1 percent of the amount available for allocation under this paragraph for any fiscal year or more than 5 percent of such amount.

#### (c) Treatment of amounts allocated but not used for any fiscal year

(1) That portion of any amount deducted by the Secretary under subsection (b)(1) for administrative purposes for any fiscal year and not expended during such fiscal year shall remain available for administrative purposes until the close of the next succeeding fiscal year and if not obligated or expended by the close of such succeeding fiscal year shall be available for disbursement by the Secretary without regard to subsection (b), to the States to carry out the purposes of this chapter.

(2) That portion of any amount allocated to any State under subsection (b)(2) or (3) for any fiscal year and not disbursed to the State for such fiscal years under section 2905 of this title shall remain available for disbursement to the State under such section for the next succeeding fiscal year and if not disbursed for such succeeding fiscal year shall be available for disbursement by the Secretary, without regard to subsection (b), to the States to carry out the purposes of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 96–366, §8, Sept. 29, 1980, 94 Stat. 1328.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Termination of Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands

For termination of Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, see note set out preceding section 1681 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.
### §168. Repealed. May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §142, 63 Stat. 109

Section, act Aug. 22, 1914, ch. 264, §2, 38 Stat. 699, related to Park as part of judicial district of Montana. See sections 106 and 131 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Exhibit 10 (r)
                    SECOND AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT

               This second amendment to consulting agreement is entered into
this 31st day of October, 2002 by and between David H. Taylor (the "Consultant")
and Guilford Mills, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (the "Company").


                                   Witnesseth:
                                   -----------

               WHEREAS, the Company and the Consultant desire to amend the
Consulting Agreement which they entered into as of March 12, 2002 and amended as
of August 30, 2002 (the "Consulting Agreement"), upon the terms and conditions
below.

               NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and
conditions contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto
agree as follows:

               1. The first sentence of Section 1(a) of the Consulting Agreement
is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following sentence is substituted in
its place:

                     The Company hereby retains the Consultant and the
                     Consultant hereby accepts retention by the Company, as a
                     consultant on the terms and subject to the conditions set
                     forth herein, for the period which commenced as of February
                     14, 2002 and which will end on December 31, 2002, unless
                     terminated earlier as provided herein (the "Consulting
                     Period").

               2. It is acknowledged and agreed that the Consultant shall remain
entitled to the second installment of his retention bonus, subject to the terms
and conditions of the August 8, 2002 retention bonus letter agreement between
the Consultant and the Company, notwithstanding that the company may make
payment of the second installment of such retention bonus amounts to
participants in the retention bonus program after the end of the Consulting
Period.

               3. Except as otherwise expressly set forth herein, the Consulting
Agreement remains unmodified and in full force and effect.

           In witness whereof, the parties hereto have executed this Second
Amendment as of the date first above written.

                                             GUILFORD MILLS, INC.

                                             By:    /s/ Robert A. Emken, Jr.
                                                    ----------------------------
                                             Name:  Robert A. Emken, Jr.
                                                    ----------------------------
                                             Title: General Counsel
                                                    ----------------------------


                                             /s/ David H. Taylor
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             David H. Taylor
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7348

JAMES ALLEN SMITH, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

EDWARD WRIGHT, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (1:06-cv-560-LMB)

Submitted: February 15, 2007 Decided: February 22, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Allen Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

James Allen Smith, Jr., seeks to appeal the district

court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition as

untimely. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court

is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Smith has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 48 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 48

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed transfer to the 
      United Arab Emirates certain defense articles and services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2019

Mr. Menendez (for himself, Mr. Graham, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Paul, Mr. Leahy, 
  Mr. Young, and Mr. Reed) introduced the following joint resolution; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed transfer to the 
      United Arab Emirates certain defense articles and services.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the issuance of an export 
license with respect to the following proposed exports to the United 
Arab Emirates is prohibited:
            (1) The transfer of the following defense articles, 
        including services and technical data, described in Executive 
        Communication 1420 (EC-1420) submitted to Congress pursuant to 
        section 36(c) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 
        2776(c)) and published in the Congressional Record on June 3, 
        2019: The proposed transfer of defense articles, defense 
        services, and technical data to support the export and 
        integration of 60,000 FMU-152A/B Joint Programmable Bomb Fuze 
        systems into the United Arab Emirates Armed Forces General 
        Headquarters' fleet of the following aircraft and associated 
        weapons: F-16, Mirage 2000, AT-802 Air Tractor and S2R-600 
        Archangel.
                                 <all>
```
----- F o r wa r ded b y B r i an S h r a g e r / R T P / U S E PA

/ U S on 02 / 18 / 2011 03 : 08 PM

-----

F r o m: Br ian S h r age r / R T P / U SE P A

/ US T o: " Higgi n s , Co r t n e y " < Co r t ne y _Hi g gin s @ o m b

. eop

. go v> C c: J i m E dd i nge r / R T P / U SEP A

/ U S @ E P A

, Ro b e r tJ W a y l and / R T P / U SE P A

/ U S @ E P A

, T ho m a s G ill i s / DC / U S EPA / U S @ EPA Da t e: 02 / 08 / 2011 09 : 58 AM S ubje c t: Re : E O 1 2 866 I n t e r ag e n c y c o mm en t s on M ajo r and Ar ea S o u r ce B oile r Rules

Co r t ne y,

My g o al i s t o ge t y ou r e s pon s e s , a long wi t h a r ed

- l i ne p r ea m ble / r ule by C O B F r i d a y.

T h an k s!

Br ian

F r o m: " Higgi n s , Co r t n e y " < Co r t ne y _Hi g gin s @ o m b

. eop

. go v> T o: Br ian S h r age r / R T P / U SE P A

/ U S @ E PA C c: T o m W a l t o n / R T P / U S E PA / U S @ E PA

, Robe r tJ W a y l and / R T P / U SE P A

/ U S @ E P A

, T ho m a s G ill i s / DC / U S EPA / U S @ EP A

, J im E dding e r / R T P / U S E PA

/ U S @ EPA Da t e: 02 / 07 / 2011 03 : 10 PM S ubje c t: E O 1286 6 I n t e r agen cy c o m m en t s on M a j o r a nd A r ea S ou rce B oile r Rules

Hi Br ian, A t t a c hed a r e t wo r e d line do c u m en t s t ha t c o n t a i n t he in t e r agen cy c o m m e n ts

on t he M a

j o r and A r e a S ou rc e B o ile rs r u le s , r e s pe c t i v el y

. A l s o a tt a c hed i s a r e dline wi t h in t e r agen cy c o mm en t s o n t he R I A

. F inall y , t h e r e i s a do c u m en t a t t a c hed wi t h in t e r agen cy c o m m en t s on t he M ajo r S ou rc e r ule, t he R I A

, a n d t he m ajo r s ou rc e c o s t m e m o.

P lea s e le t m e k now i f y ou ha v e an y que s t i on s

. A l s o , do y ou k n ow wh e n we
e x pe c t t o ge t c o mm en t s ba ck f r o m E P A?

T h an k s, Co r t ney

___ _ _______ _ _______ _ _______ _ _______ _ _______ _ ____Co r t ne y Higgins

P oli cy A na l y st O M B / O I R A

/ NRE 202

. 395

. 7856

c higg i n s @ o m b

. eop

. gov [ a tt a c h m ent " E O _12 8 66_ A S

_ a nd_ M ajo r

_ S ou rc e_ B oi l e r

__R I A

_ _ 2011011 8

_ I n t e r ag e n c y C o m m en t s Unde rE O 1 2866

. do c" [ a t t a c h m e nt " B oile rs

_ E O 12 8 66 I n t e r a gen cy Co m m e n t s

_ F eb42011

. do c

. do cx " [ a t t a c h m ent " E

. O

.

_ 1 2866__N ES H A P

_ f o r

_ Ar ea_ B oil e r

s

_ f in a l_ r ule_2 0 110118_ I n t e r agen cy Co mm en t s Unde rE O 12 8 66. do c" [ a t t a c h m e nt " E

. O

.

_ 1 2866_ M a j o r S o u r c e sB oil e r s N ES H A P _2 0 60 -A Q 25_ I n t e r agen cyc o mm en t s u nde rE O 128 6 6

. d o c x"
<PAGE>
                                  Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In  connection  with the quarterly  report of  GoAmerica,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended  March 31,  2003 filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I, Daniel R. Luis,  Chief
Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects,  the consolidated  financial  condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and consolidated  results of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.

Dated: May 14, 2003

                                                    /s/ Daniel R. Luis
                                                    ------------------
                                                    Daniel R. Luis
                                                    Chief Executive Officer

This  certification  has been  furnished  solely  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been  provided  to  GoAmerica,  Inc.  and will be retained by
GoAmerica,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.


                                      -20-

<PAGE>
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-22-00268-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 393rd District Court

Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15-04711-393

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Birdwell, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN THE INTEREST OF X.G., M.G., J.G., AND M.G., CHILDREN
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered Appellant’s unopposed “Motion to Withdraw Appeal,”

which we construe as a motion to dismiss the appeal. We grant the motion and 

dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Appellants must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: October 27, 2022
Searched for **http://www.stopbullying.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.stopbullying.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
### §410aaa–21. Findings

The Congress finds that—

(1) a proclamation by President Franklin Roosevelt in 1936 established Joshua Tree National Monument to protect various objects of historical and scientific interest;

(2) Joshua Tree National Monument today is recognized as a major unit of the National Park System, having extraordinary values enjoyed by millions of visitors;

(3) the monument boundaries as modified in 1950 and 1961 exclude and thereby expose to incompatible development and inconsistent management, contiguous Federal lands of essential and superlative natural, ecological, archeological, paleontological, cultural, historical, and wilderness values;

(4) Joshua Tree National Monument should be enlarged by the addition of contiguous Federal lands of national park caliber, and afforded full recognition and statutory protection as a National Park; and

(5) the nondesignated wilderness within Joshua Tree should receive statutory protection by designation pursuant to the Wilderness Act [16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.].

(Pub. L. 103–433, title IV, §401, Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4487.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Wilderness Act, referred to in par. (5), is Pub. L. 88–577, Sept. 3, 1964, 78 Stat. 890, which is classified generally to chapter 23 (§1131 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1131 of this title and Tables.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Granite Cliffs Incorporated,
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"),  the undersigned,  B.
Stephen Bailey,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge  and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Philip and Haralambos Gregoriov, Appellants.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D2022

- 1603

_____________________________
A LLEN J OEL W EEDEN , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the County Court for Escambia County

. Charles P. Young , Judge

.

January 8, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R AY , B ILBREY , and L ONG , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Megan Long
, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Robert “Charlie” Lee
, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 67 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.J.Res.67

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twenty

                            Joint Resolution

 
  Providing for the reappointment of Risa Lavizzo-Mourey as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the 
Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other 
than Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the expiration of the 
term of Risa Lavizzo-Mourey of Pennsylvania on February 21, 2020, is 
filled by the reappointment of the incumbent. The reappointment is for 
a term of six years, beginning on the later of February 21, 2020, or 
the date of enactment of this joint resolution.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 31, 2020.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 31, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20D0433. E HOWARD CARSON, JR. et al. v. TOM BROWN et al.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

17CV0806