alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

| Delaware                                                          |   | 000-23143               |   | 13-3379479                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
| (State or other jurisdictionof incorporation)                     |   | (CommissionFile Number) |   | (IRS EmployerIdentification No.) |
|                                                              |   |                    |   |                             |
| 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, New York                  |   | 10591                   |
| (Address of principal executive offices)                          |   | (Zip Code)              |
| Registrant's telephone number, including area code (914) 789-2800 |
| o | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|---|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| o | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|---|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|---|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
|---|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

| Item 2.02. | Results of Operations and Financial Condition. |
|------------|------------------------------------------------|
|  Item 9.01. | Financial Statements and Exhibits. |
|------------------|------------------------------------|
| (d)   | Exhibits |
|-----------------|----------|
| Exhibit No. | Description |
|-------------|-------------|
| 99.1 | Press Release dated March 15, 2013. |
|------|-------------------------------------|

----

|   | PROGENICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. |
|--------|---------------------------------|
|   | By:                             | /s/ ANGELO W. LOVALLO, JR. |
|   |                            | Angelo W. Lovallo, Jr. |
|   |                            | Senior Executive Director, |
|   |                            | Financial Reporting and Treasurer |
|   |                            | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 28, 2024

No. 04-22-00483-CR

Ricardo GONZALES, Jr.,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-CR-13554

Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding

ABATEMENT ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we ABATE this appeal and REMAND 

the cause to the trial court to conduct a hearing on Ricardo Gonzales Jr.’s motion for new trial on 

or before October 31, 2024. The trial judge shall see that a record is made and shall order the court 

reporter and the trial clerk to forward a transcribed record of the hearing and a supplemental clerk’s 

record containing the trial court’s signed order ruling on the motion for new trial. Those records 

shall be filed with the clerk of this court on or before thirty days following the trial court’s order. 

See Guillory v. State, 652 S.W.3d 499, 507 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2022, abatement 

order on reh’g) (per curiam); see also Martinez v. State, 74 S.W.3d 19, 21-22 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2002).

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active docket. 

The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket after the supplemental reporter’s and 

clerk’s records are filed. It is the responsibility of any party seeking reinstatement to request a 

hearing date from the trial court and to schedule a hearing in compliance with this court’s order. 

If the parties do not request a hearing, the court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing 

date and notify the parties of the date and time of the hearing. See Guillory, 652 S.W.3d at 507–

08.

It is so ORDERED on August 28, 2024.

_____________________________

Irene Rios, Justice
04-22-00483-CR

- 2 -

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 28th day of August, 2024.

_____________________________

Luz Estrada, Chief Deputy Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 40 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 40

   Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed export to 
   India, Israel, Republic of Korea, and Kingdom of Saudi Arabia of 
    certain defense articles, including technical data and defense 
                               services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2019

Mr. Menendez (for himself, Mr. Graham, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Paul, Mr. Leahy, 
  Mr. Young, and Mr. Reed) introduced the following joint resolution; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed export to 
   India, Israel, Republic of Korea, and Kingdom of Saudi Arabia of 
    certain defense articles, including technical data and defense 
                               services.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the issuance of an export 
license with respect to the following proposed export to India, Israel, 
Republic of Korea, and Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is prohibited:
            (1) The transfer to India, Israel, Republic of Korea, and 
        Kingdom of Saudi Arabia of the following license for export of 
        certain defense articles, including technical data and defense 
        services, described in Executive Communication 1417 (EC-1417) 
        submitted to Congress pursuant to section 36(c) of the Arms 
        Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(c)) and published in the 
        Congressional Record on June 3, 2019: The proposed 
        manufacturing agreement with Huneed Technologies Company, Ltd. 
        in South Korea to transfer defense articles, defense services, 
        and technical data to support manufacture, production, test, 
        inspection, modification, enhancement, rework, and repair of F/
        A18E/F and derivative series aircraft panels for end use by the 
        Boeing Company.
                                 <all>
```
### §3839aa–9. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–79, title II, §2706(a), Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 769

Section, Pub. L. 99–198, title XII, §1240I, as added Pub. L. 107–171, title II, §2301, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 257; amended Pub. L. 110–234, title II, §2510, May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1064; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title II, §2510, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1792, related to agricultural water enhancement program.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeal; Transitional Provisions

Pub. L. 113–79, title II, §2706, Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 769, provided that:

"(a) Repeal.—Except as provided in subsection (b), section 1240I of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3839aa–9) is repealed.

"(b) Transitional Provisions.—

"(1) Effect on existing contracts and agreements.—The amendment made by this section [repealing section 3839aa–9 of this title] shall not affect the validity or terms of any contract or agreement entered into by the Secretary of Agriculture under section 1240I of the Food Security Act of 1985 ([former] 16 U.S.C. 3839aa–9) before the date of enactment of the Agricultural Act of 2014 [Feb. 7, 2014], or any payments required to be made in connection with the contract or agreement.

"(2) Funding.—

"(A) Use of prior year funds.—Notwithstanding the repeal of section 1240I of the Food Security Act of 1985 ([former] 16 U.S.C. 3839aa–9), any funds made available from the Commodity Credit Corporation to carry out the agricultural water enhancement program under that section for fiscal years 2009 through 2013 shall be made available to carry out contracts and agreements referred to in paragraph (1) that were entered into prior to the date of enactment of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (including the provision of technical assistance).

"(B) Other.—On exhaustion of funds made available under subparagraph (A), the Secretary [of Agriculture] may use funds made available to carry out the regional conservation partnership program under subtitle I of title XII of the Food Security Act of 1985 [16 U.S.C. 3871 et seq.], as added by section 2401, to continue to carry out contracts and agreements referred to in paragraph (1) using the provisions of law and regulation applicable to such contracts and agreements as in existence on the day before the date of enactment of the Agricultural Act of 2014."
EXHIBIT 32.2  Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Teliphone Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10–Q for the period ending June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lawry Trevor-Deutsch, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:  1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Lawry Trevor-DeutschLawry Trevor-Deutsch
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer  Dated: August 22, 2011
**Exhibit 31.3**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Karen A. Puckett, President and Chief Executive Officer of Harte Hanks, Inc. (the “Company”), certify that:

 

1.          I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of the Company;

 

2.          Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

| April 30, 2018 |   | /s/ Karen A. Puckett                  |
|---------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
| Date                |   | Karen A. Puckett                      |
|                |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
# C_2014009EN.01000501.xml

| 11.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 November 2013 — Council of the European Union v Gul Ahmed Textile Mills Ltd, European Commission

(Case C-638/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Dumping - Imports of cotton-type bed linen originating in Pakistan - Regulation (EC) No 384/96 - Article 3(7) - Concept of ‘other factors’)

2014/C 9/06

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix, Agent, and G. Berrisch, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Gul Ahmed Textile Mills Ltd (represented by: L. Ruessmann, avocat), European Commission (represented by: A. Stobiecka-Kuik, Agent, and E. McGovern, Barrister)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 September 2011 in Case T-199/04 Gul Ahmed Textile Mills v Council which annulled, in so far as it concerned Gul Ahmed Textile Mills Ltd, Council Regulation (EC) No 397/2004 of 2 March 2004 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of cotton-type bed linen originating in Pakistan (OJ 2004 L 66, p. 1) — Infringement of Article 3(7) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (OJ 1996 L 56, p. 1) — Determination of injury — Establishment of a causal link between the dumped imports and the injury caused — Factors to be taken into consideration

Gul Ahmed Textile Mills

Council

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 27 September 2011 in Case T-199/04 Gul Ahmed Textile Mills v Council; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 27 September 2011 in Case T-199/04 Gul Ahmed Textile Mills v Council;

| 2. | Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;

| 3. | Reserves the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Reserves the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 65, 3.3.2012.

1

---
### NUMBER 13

- 13

- 0015 2

- CR


## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

ARTHUR CANN , Appellant,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 148th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.



## ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Longoria Order Per Curiam

The Honorable Stan Turpen , counsel for appellant, Arthur Cann , has filed a motion

to withdraw as counsel in this cause and extend time to file appellant’s brief. According

to the motion to withdraw , counsel was appointed to represent appellant and there is not
a workable attorney client relationship. Counsel requests permission to withdraw and2

that another attorney be a ppointed for purposes of appeal

. We GRANT the motion for

extension of time to file the brief and ABATE and REMAND this cause as follows.
Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means necessary to make
appropriate findings and recommendations concerning the following: (1) whether
appellant desires to prosecute this appeal; (2) whether appellant has been denied
effective assistance of counsel; and (3) whether appellant is indigent and entitled to

court

- appointed counsel.

If the trial court dete rmines that appellant does want to continue the appeal and
that appellant is indigent and entitled to court

- appointed counsel, the trial court shall
appoint new counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. If new counsel is appointed,
the name, address, telephone number, and state bar number of said counsel shall be
included in an order appointing counsel.
The trial court shall cause its finding s and recommendations, together with any
orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be include d in a supplemental
clerk's record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter's record
of any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk's record and supplemental
reporter's record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the
expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM
Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).3

Delivered and filed the 11 th day of February, 2014

.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Ex parte Shawn Paul Robinson

Appellate case number: 01

- 22

- 00583

- CR

Trial court case number: 1751891

Trial court: 351st District Court of Harris County

Appellant, through counsel, filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s order denying his application for writ of habeas corpus. The complete appellate record has been filed with this Court. After a review of the appellate record, on August 18, 2022, the Court ordered the parties to submit briefing. See T EX

. R. A PP . P

. 31.1. The Court’s order set a deadline for appellant to file his brief on or before September 7, 2022. However, no brief was filed. Accordingly, on September 20, 2022, the Court notified appellant unless he filed his brief within ten days of the Court’ s notice, the appeal would be abated and the trial court would be directed to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure to timely file a brief.

Appellant did not file a brief in response to the Court’s September 20, 2022 notice. Accordingl y, on October 6, 2022, the Court abated the appeal and remand ed for the trial court to conduct a hearing regarding the failure to file a brief. On October 7, 2022, the Honorable Natalia Cornelio, the presiding judge of the 351st District Court

, filed a le tter with the Clerk of this Court, notifying the Court that the hearing required by our October 6, 2022 order was scheduled to occur on October 13, 2022.

On October 12, 2022, appellant’s appointed counsel filed his appellant’s brief, as
well as a “Motion to Accept Late

- Filed Brief with Apologies and to Reinstate Appeal.” In the motion, appellant requests that the brief filed on October 12, 2022 be accepted by the Court, and that the Court reinstate the appeal on the active docket.

Appellant’s motion is g ranted . The case is reinstated on the Court’s active docket, appellant’s brief is deemed filed as of the date of filing, October 12, 2022. Because appellant has filed his appellant’s brief, the hearing directed in our October 6, 2022 order is no longer n ecessary. The trial court clerk and court reporter are no longer required to file the supplemental clerk’s record and reporter’s record, respectively, as required by our October 6, 2022 order.2

Further, the State’s brief is due within twenty days from the filing of appellant’s brief, on or before November 1, 2022.

It is so ORDERED

.

Judge’s signature: ___

/s/ Amparo Guerra

______  Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: _ October 18, 2022

_____________________
Appendix G3 

Algonquin Ramapo Expansion Project
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 17 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 17

  Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for the lying in 
state of the remains of the last Medal of Honor recipient of World War 
    II, in order to honor the Greatest Generation and the more than 
 16,000,000 men and women who served in the Armed Forces of the United 
                       States from 1941 to 1945.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 16, 2019

   Mr. Manchin (for himself and Mrs. Capito) submitted the following 
concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules and 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for the lying in 
state of the remains of the last Medal of Honor recipient of World War 
    II, in order to honor the Greatest Generation and the more than 
 16,000,000 men and women who served in the Armed Forces of the United 
                       States from 1941 to 1945.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. HONORING THE LAST SURVIVING MEDAL OF HONOR RECIPIENT OF 
              WORLD WAR II.

    (a) Use of Rotunda.--The individual who is the last surviving 
recipient of the Medal of Honor for acts performed during World War II 
shall be permitted to lie in state in the rotunda of the Capitol upon 
death, if the individual (or the next of kin of the individual) so 
elects.
    (b) Implementation.--The Architect of the Capitol, under the 
direction of the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of 
the House of Representatives, shall take the necessary steps to 
implement subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of GoAmerica, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Daniel R. Luis, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.

Dated: November 12, 2004

                                                        /s/ Daniel R. Luis
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        Daniel R. Luis
                                                        Chief Executive Officer

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

                                      -21-
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 30 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the United Arab Emirates of certain 

defense articles and services. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the following proposed foreign military sale to the 

4 United Arab Emirates is prohibited: 

5 (1) The sale of the following defense articles, 

6 including defense services and technical data, de7 scribed in Transmittal No. 19–18, submitted to Con8 gress pursuant to section 36(b) of the Arms Export 

9 Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(b)) and published in 

10 the Congressional Record on June 4, 2019: The pro11 posed sale of a blanket-order United States Marine 

12 Corps training, training support, and other training 
2 

†SJ 30 ES 

1 related services in support of the United Arab Emir2 ates Presidential Guard Command. 

Passed the Senate June 20, 2019. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 30 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proEmirates of certain defense articles and services. posed foreign military sale to the United Arab