alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 997 

To recognize and honor the service of individuals who served in the United 

States Cadet Nurse Corps during World War II, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 3, 2019 

Ms. WARREN (for herself, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. KING, Mr. DAINES, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. MENENDEZ, Ms. HASSAN, Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. 

JONES, Mr. TESTER, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. BOOKER, and Mrs. SHAHEEN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To recognize and honor the service of individuals who served 

in the United States Cadet Nurse Corps during World 

War II, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States Cadet 

5 Nurse Corps Service Recognition Act of 2019’’. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 997 IS

1 SEC. 2. RECOGNITION AND HONORING OF SERVICE OF IN2 DIVIDUALS WHO SERVED IN UNITED STATES 

3 CADET NURSE CORPS DURING WORLD WAR 

4 II. 

5 (a) DETERMINATION OF ACTIVE MILITARY SERV6 ICE.— 

7 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense 

8 shall be deemed to have determined under subpara9 graph (A) of section 401(a)(1) of the GI Bill Im10 provement Act of 1977 (Public Law 95–202; 38 

11 U.S.C. 106 note) that the service of the organization 

12 known as the United States Cadet Nurse Corps dur13 ing the period beginning on July 1, 1943, and end14 ing on December 31, 1948, constitutes active mili15 tary service. 

16 (2) ISSUANCE OF DISCHARGE.—Not later than 

17 one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, 

18 the Secretary shall, pursuant to subparagraph (B) of 

19 such section, issue to each member of such organiza20 tion a discharge from service of such organization 

21 under honorable conditions where the nature and 

22 duration of the service of such member so warrants. 

23 (b) BENEFITS.— 

24 (1) STATUS AS A VETERAN.—Except as other25 wise provided in this subsection, an individual who 

26 receives a discharge under subsection (a)(2) for servVerDate Sep 11 2014 17:06 Apr 06, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S997.IS S997

pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 997 IS

1 ice shall be honored as a veteran but shall not be en2 titled by reason of such service to any benefit under 

3 a law administered by the Secretary of Veterans Af4 fairs. 

5 (2) BURIAL BENEFITS.—Service for which an 

6 individual receives a discharge under subsection 

7 (a)(2) shall be considered service in the active mili8 tary, naval, or air service (as defined in section 101 

9 of title 38, United States Code) for purposes of eligi10 bility and entitlement to benefits under chapters 23 

11 and 24 of title 38, United States Code. 

12 (3) MEDALS OR OTHER COMMENDATIONS.—The 

13 Secretary of Defense may design and produce a 

14 service medal or other commendation to honor indi15 viduals who receive a discharge under subsection 

16 (a)(2). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 38 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 38

 Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed export to the 
  Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and 
       Northern Ireland of certain defense articles and services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2019

   Mr. Menendez (for himself, Mr. Graham, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Paul, Mr. 
    Leahy, Mr. Young, and Mr. Reed) introduced the following joint 
   resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                           Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed export to the 
  Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and 
       Northern Ireland of certain defense articles and services.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the issuance of an export 
license with respect to the following proposed exports to the Kingdom 
of Saudi Arabia and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern 
Ireland is prohibited:
            (1) The transfer of the following defense articles, 
        including services and technical data, described in Executive 
        Communication 1422 (EC-1422) submitted to Congress pursuant to 
        section 36(c) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 
        2776(c)) and published in the Congressional Record on June 3, 
        2019: The proposed transfer of defense articles, defense 
        services, and technical data to support the manufacture of the 
        Aurora Fuzing System for the Paveway IV Precision Guided Bomb 
        Program.
                                 <all>
```
Opinion issued May 1 6 , 2023

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 23
- 00165
- CR

——————————— GREGORIO GUERRERO , Appella nt

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appell e e
On Appeal from the 339th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 1379958

MEMORANDU M OPINION Appellant, Gregorio Guerrero, has filed a motion to dismiss t his appeal. The motion to dismiss complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and no prior decision s ha ve issued. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 42.2(a), (b). Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.2 PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Landau, and Rivas

- Molloy. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2( b).
### §2202b. Payment limitation

The maximum payment made under the emergency conservation program to an agricultural producer under sections 2201 and 2202 of this title shall not exceed $500,000.

(Pub. L. 95–334, title IV, §402B, as added Pub. L. 115–334, title II, §2403(c), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4572.)
### §2504. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 95–625, title X, §1005, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3540; Pub. L. 103–322, title III, §31503, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1889, related to Federal assistance grants. See section 200502 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
#### William A. L’Hommedieu and Louis Greenberg, Copartners, etc., Respondents, v. Cesare Campanini, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  OF UNITED SURGICAL PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL, INC.  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2003 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mark A. Kopser, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of United Surgical Partners International, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that:



| |  | /s/MARK A. KOPSERMark A. Kopser
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
August 8, 2003 |  | 
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Luna Gold Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, David De Witt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 18th day of November, 2003.



| | /s/ David De Witt
David De Witt
Chief Executive Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------













---
(No. 80-CC-0787

#### Marian Mills, f/k/a Marian Armstrong, Claimant, *v.*The State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 17, 1983.*

Kritzer, Stansell, Critser & Whitman, for Claimant.

Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General (Sue Mueller, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.

Poch, J.

This claim comes before the Court upon a joint stipulation of the parties which states as follows:

The State of Illinois and Marian Mills, Claimant in this matter, contracted in 1966 to display Mrs. Mills’ antique storm buggy in the State Fair Farm Museum on behalf of the Department of Agriculture. The buggy was displayed from 1966 until 1970 when the Illinois State Fair Farm Museum was razed. At that time the State of Illinois requested permission to store the buggy in another location until the museum was rebuilt. The buggy was stored in the Buffalo Barn on the State Fair property until 1972, when it disappeared. The buggy was not located in a State Fair property inventory in 1979.

The State of Illinois concedes liability in this matter to the extent agreed upon in the joint stipulation. The State of Illinois and the Claimant agree to the value of the buggy as being $2,000.00. There were attached to the joint stipulation two estimates indicating that $2,000.00 is a fair sum for the buggy. Both parties agree to the granting of an award in the amount of $2,000.00. There has *736been no other evidence presented, and briefs were waived.

Both parties have agreed that this award will constitute full and final satisfaction of the claim herein or any other claim arising out of the same occurrence.

While this Court is not necessarily bound by a stipulation such as this, it has no desire to interpose a controversy where none appears to exist. The stipulation submitted by the parties appears to be entered into freely and fairly, and its contents appear to be reasonable. The Court, therefore, finds no reason not to accept it and follow its recommendation of an award for $2,000.00.

It is hereby ordered, that the Claimant, Marian Mills, be awarded the amount of $2,000.00 in full and final satisfaction of this claim.
§ 5.400 Filing of informational materials. ( a ) The informational materials required to be filed with the Attorney General under section 4(a) of the Act shall be filed with the Registration Unit no later than 48 hours after the beginning of the transmittal of the informational materials.
( b ) Whenever informational materials have been filed pursuant to section 4(a) of the Act, an agent of a foreign principal shall not be required, in the event of further dissemination of the same materials, to forward additional copies thereof to the Registration Unit.
( c ) Unless specifically directed to do so by the Assistant Attorney General, a registrant is not required to file a copy of a motion picture which he disseminates on behalf of his foreign principal, so long as he files monthly reports on its dissemination. In each such case this registrant shall submit to the Registration Unit either a film strip showing the label required by section 4(b) of the Act or an affidavit certifying that the required label has been made a part of the film.
[Order No. 376-67, 32 FR 6362, Apr. 22, 1967, as amended by Order No. 523-73, 38 FR 18235, July 9, 1973; Order No. 568-74, 39 FR 18646, May 29, 1974; Order No. 2674-2003, 68 FR 33631, June 5, 2003]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 14, 2018

Order 

Clerk

September 14, 2018

156901(46)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 156901

v COA: 333827

Kent CC: 15-009717-FH

JENNIFER MARIE HAMMERLUND,

Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to extend the time 

for filing her supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief submitted on 

September 10, 2018, is accepted as timely filed.
<PAGE>


                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.15

                              AMENDING AGREEMENT

          THIS AGREEMENT dated as of the 23rd day of January, 1998.

BETWEEN:

                    ROYAL OAK MINES INC.

                    (hereinafter called the "Corporation")

                                                              OF THE FIRST PART

                    - AND -

                    MELLON BANK, N.A. solely in its capacity as the Trustee for
                    GENERAL MOTORS EMPLOYEES DOMESTIC GROUP
                    PENSION TRUST

                    (hereinafter called the "Holder")

                                                             OF THE SECOND PART


    WHEREAS the Corporation issued to the Holder a Senior Secured Debenture 
(the "Debenture") dated as of December 31, 1997 in the principal amount of 
U.S. $14,600,000,

    AND WHEREAS the Corporation and the Holder wish to amend the Debenture 
on the terms hereinafter set forth;

    NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSES that in consideration of the 
premises herein contained and other good and valuable consideration,the 
receipt and adequacy of which consideration are hereby acknowledged, the 
parties hereto agree as follows:

1.  In paragraph (g) of the definition of "Permitted Encumbrances" in 
Schedule "A" to the Debenture, the reference to Cdn. $5,000,000" is hereby 
amended and revised to "Cdn. $10,000,000".

2.  Subparagraph (i) of section 4.3.7 of the Debenture is hereby amended by 
adding the following words in the last line thereof after the words 
"Subordinated Note Trust Indenture":

    "together with additional interest if and when due of one-half of one 
percent (.50%) per annum for the period following 18 months after the date 
hereof".

3.  The foregoing amendments shall be effective as of and from the date 
hereof.


<PAGE>

                                    Page 2

4.  In all other respects the parties hereto confirm the terms of the 
Debenture.

5.  This Agreement may be signed in counterparts and each of such 
counterparts shall constitute an original document and such counterparts, 
taken together, shall constitute one and the same instrument.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Agreement has been executed by the parties 
hereto as of the date first above written.


                                   ROYAL OAK MINES INC.


                                   By:         /s/ James H. Wood
                                       --------------------------------------
                                       Name:   James H. Wood
                                       Title:  Chief Financial Officer


                                   MELLON BANK, N.A., solely in its capacity as
                                   Trustee for GENERAL MOTORS
                                   EMPLOYEES DOMESTIC GROUP
                                   PENSION TRUST


                                   By: 
                                       --------------------------------------
                                       Name:
                                       Title:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6544
In Re: HOMER RICHARDS, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-93-62-A, CA-97-634-AM) Submitted: July 13, 2000 Decided: July 24, 2000 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Homer Richards, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Homer Richards has filed a petition for a writ of mandamusseeking an order directing the district court to hold an evidentiary hearing and make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to “potential claims” that the district court allegedly overlooked when ruling on Richards’ unsuccessful 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000) motion. Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used on in extraordinary circumstances. See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). The party seeking mandamus relief carries the heavy burden of showing that he has “no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires” and that his right to such relief is “clear and indisputable.” Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc. , 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980). Richards has not made such a showing. Accordingly, we deny his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the mandamus petition. We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 6, 2020

Order 

Clerk

March 6, 2020

160737

JOHN WHEELER, Plaintiff-Appellant, SC: 160737

v COA: 344496

Oakland CC: 2017-156740-NO

BUSCH’S INC., and SIMSBURY F/14 LLC, Defendants-Appellees. 

_______________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the stipulation signed by counsel for the parties 

agreeing to the dismissal of the application for leave to appeal is considered, and the 

application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Harvest  Valley  Ventures,
Inc.,  on Form  10-QSB for the  period  ending  June 30,  2002 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, B. Stephen Bailey, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack,

 Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 

October 9, 2020

Order 

Clerk

October 9, 2020

160034(101)(102)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 160034

v COA: 345268

Saginaw CC: 84-000570-FC

ROBIN RICK MANNING,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_______________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the separate motions of Otis Cole-El and Everett R. 

Jackson to file briefs amicus curiae are GRANTED. The amicus briefs submitted by those 

individuals on October 1, 2020, and October 5, 2020, respectively, are accepted for filing.
#### § 700.19 Preservation of records.

The Office shall preserve all correspondence relating to the requests it receives under this subpart, and all records processed pursuant to such requests, until such time as the destruction of such correspondence and records is authorized pursuant to title 44 of the U.S. Code. Under no circumstances shall records be destroyed while they are the subject of a pending request for access, appeal, or lawsuit under the Act.
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 45 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That the Architect of the Capitol is author3 ized and directed to transfer to the custody of the Su4 preme Court of the United States the catafalque which 

5 is situated in the crypt beneath the Rotunda of the Capitol 

6 so that such catafalque may be used in the Supreme Court 

7 Building in connection with services to be conducted there 

8 for the late honorable Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Associate 

9 Justice of the United States Supreme Court. The custody 

10 of the catafalque shall then be returned to the Architect 

11 of the Capitol to be used in connection with such services 

12 to be conducted in National Statuary Hall. 

Passed the Senate September 21, 2020. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 45 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the use of the catafalque situated in 

preme Court. burg, Associate Justice of the United States SuCapitol for the late honorable Ruth Bader Ginsducted in the Supreme Court Building and the connection with memorial services to be conthe crypt beneath the Rotunda of the Capitol in
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Document Search 
-  Policy On Non-retaliation Against Small Businesses 

# Policy on non-retaliation against small businesses

## About this document and download

As part of its mission to create a fair, less burdensome regulatory enforcement environment for small business government wide, the Office of the National Ombudsman is working with each federal agency to establish a policy prohibiting retaliatory actions by its employees against regulated entities.

  Download  .pdf
§ 31.1 General. ( a ) This implements subpart I of part B of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974, which authorizes a formula grant program.
( b ) In addition to this subpart, other rules or regulations may be applicable to the formula grant program described in paragraph (a) of this section; see, *e.g.,* 2 CFR part 200 (Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards), as adopted by the Department of Justice through 2 CFR part 2800 or other applicable regulation; and 28 CFR part 42 (Nondiscrimination in Federally Assisted Programs—Implementation of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964).
( c ) Unless expressly provided otherwise, any reference in this subpart to any provision of Federal law not in this subpart shall be understood to constitute a general reference and thus to include any subsequent amendments to the provision.