alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF UNITED SURGICAL PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with
the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30,
2003 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Donald E. Steen, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of United Surgical Partners International, Inc. (the Company),
hereby certify that: 1.The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2.The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Donald E. SteenDonald E. Steen 
  Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer 
  November 6, 2003  1


---
#### § 11.3 Compliance with existing laws.

The procurement of the services of private attorneys for debt collection shall be accomplished in accordance with the competitive procurement procedures mandated by Federal law, and set forth in 41 U.S.C. 3307. Best efforts shall be made to encourage extensive participation by law firms owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals and law firms that are qualified HUBZone small business concerns in the competition for award of these contracts in the program districts. Such efforts shall include, at minimum, publication of the requirement for these services in FedBizOpps and in a selection of pertinent legal publications likely to reach socially and economically disadvantaged firms, as well as sending written notice of the requirements to bar associations that have a significant socially and economically disadvantaged membership in the program districts. These special recruitment efforts will not authorize or permit preferential consideration to any bidders in selection for award of these contracts. The Department's Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization shall also make its resources available to assist in encouraging broad participation in this competition.

[Order No. 1201-87, 52 FR 24449, July 1, 1987, as amended by AG Order 3689-2016, 81 FR 43944, July 6, 2016]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eliseo Lugo, Jr., Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 675]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Ort, J.), rendered September 3, 2003, convicting him of assault in the second degree (two counts), and endangering the welfare of a minor, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the trial court’s *Ventimiglia/ Molineux*ruling *(see People v Ventimiglia,*52 NY2d 350 [1981]; *People v Molineux,*168 NY 264 [1901]) is without merit. The evidence of the defendant’s prior acts of abuse was properly admitted, as it was relevant to show the absence of accident *(see People v Figueroa,*245 AD2d 463 [1997]; *People v Basir,*179 AD2d 662, 664 [1992]). Moreover, such evidence is especially warranted in cases such as this involving child abuse, “where the crime charged has occurred in the privacy of the home and the facts are not easily unraveled” *(People v Henson,*33 NY2d 63, 72 [1973]; *see People v Basir, supra).*

To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, “it is *843incumbent on [the] defendant to demonstrate the absence of strategic or other legitimate explanations for counsel’s failure” *(People v Montana,*71 NY2d 705, 709 [1988]; *see People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 712 [1998]; *People v Jean,*21 AD3d 499 [2005]). “So long as the evidence, the law, and the circumstances of a particular case, viewed in totality and as of the time of the representation, reveal that the attorney provided meaningful representation, the constitutional requirement will have been met” *(People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]; *see People v Jean, supra).*Here, the record demonstrates that the defendant received meaningful representation *(see People v Benevento, supra).*The defense counsel presented a clear and cogent opening and summation, a five-witness defense, and secured the defendant an acquittal on the top three charges of assault in the first degree.

The remaining contentions raised in the defendant’s supplemental pro se brief are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, are without merit. Schmidt, J.E, Adams, Santucci and Lifson, JJ., concur.
### §2910. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated for purposes of making reimbursements under section 2905 of this title to States for the development and implementation of conservation plans and for administration of this chapter under section 2907 of this title not to exceed $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997.

(Pub. L. 96–366, §11, Sept. 29, 1980, 94 Stat. 1329; Pub. L. 99–375, Aug. 7, 1986, 100 Stat. 803; Pub. L. 100–653, title VIII, §801, Nov. 14, 1988, 102 Stat. 3833; Pub. L. 101–593, title I, §106, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 2955; Pub. L. 102–440, title III, §301, Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2234.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–440 substituted "fiscal years 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997" for "fiscal years 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, and 1992".

1990—Pub. L. 101–593 substituted "1990, 1991, and 1992" for "and 1990".

1988—Pub. L. 100–653 substituted "1988, 1989, and 1990" for "and 1988".

1986—Pub. L. 99–375 substituted "1985, 1986, 1987, and 1988" for "and 1985".
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 72 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 72

   Providing for the reappointment of Michael M. Lynton as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 11, 2020

  Mr. Boozman (for himself, Mr. Leahy, and Mr. Perdue) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
                 Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   Providing for the reappointment of Michael M. Lynton as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 
reason of the expiration of the term of Michael M. Lynton of California 
is filled by the reappointment of the incumbent. The reappointment is 
for a term of 6 years, beginning on the later of September 29, 2020, or 
the date of the enactment of this joint resolution.
                                 <all>
```
了解详细信息,请访问

听取并遵循您所在州和地方当局的指示。

生病时待在家中。不要去上班。联络您的医护人员。

如果您的孩子生病了,让其待在家中。不要让他们去上学。联络您的医护人员。

如果您家中某人的冠状病毒测试呈阳性,那么全部家庭成员都要待在家中。不要去上班。不要去上学。

联络您的医护人员。

如果您是老年人,请待在家中,并远离他人。

如果您有严重的潜在健康状况,而这种状况可能使您面临更大的风险(例如,损害您肺脏或心脏功能,

或削弱您的免疫系统的疾病),请待在家中,并远离他人。

天减缓

传播

总统的美国 冠状病毒指南
学校的运作可以加速冠状病毒的传播。具有社区传播证据的州的州长应关闭受影响及周边地区的学校。州长应关闭社区传播区域附近的社区中的学校,即使这

些地区位于邻州。此外,州和地方当局应关闭在与学校有关的人群中已鉴定出冠状病毒的学校。关闭学校的州和地方当局需要解决关键受影响者的育儿需求,

以及儿童的营养需求。

老年人特别容易受到冠状病毒的威胁。所有州都应遵循联邦的指导,并停止对养老院,退休及长期护理机构的社交性访问。

在有社区传播证据的州,应对其酒吧,饭店,美食广场,体育馆以及其他人群聚集的室内外场所进行关闭。

尽可能地在家工作或学习。

根据国土安全部的定义,如果您从事于关键性的基础行

业(例如,医疗保健服务以及制药和食品供应),您对

维护正常工作时间表负有特殊责任。您和您的雇主应遵

循疾病预防和控制中心()的指导,以保护您在工

作中的健康。

避免多于人以上的的社交聚会。

避免在酒吧,餐馆和美食广场进行饮食使用得来速,

取餐,或送餐。

避免随意旅行,外出购物和社交性访问。

除非提供关键性帮助之外,不要访问养老院,退休及长

期护理机构

保持良好的卫生:

洗手,尤其是在触摸任何经常使用的物品或表面之后。

避免碰触您的脸部

打喷嚏或咳嗽时使用纸巾,或肘部内侧。

尽可能地对经常使用的物品和表面进行消毒。

即使您年轻或身体健康,您也是处于危险之中的,您的活动可能会增加他人的风险。

尽己所能来减缓冠状病毒的传播是至关重要。

尽己所能来减缓冠状病毒的传播

总统的美国 冠状病毒指南
尽己所能

减缓传播

避免在酒吧,饭店和美食

广场进行饮食 

总统的美国 冠状病毒指南
尽己所能

减缓传播

尽可能地在家工作或学习

尽己所能

减缓传播

总统的美国 冠状病毒指南
尽己所能

减缓传播

避免人以上的的团体聚会

总统的美国 冠状病毒指南
尽己所能

减缓传播

即使您年轻或身体健康,您也是处于危险之中的,您的活动可能会增加他人的风

险。尽己所能来减缓冠状病毒的传播是至关重要。
生病时待在家中。不要去上班。

联络您的医护人员。

如果您的孩子生病了,让其待在家中。

不要让他们去上学。

联络您的医护人员。

如果您是老年人,请待在家中,并远离他人。

如果您有严重的潜在健康状况,

而这种状况可能使您面临更大的风险,

请待在家中,并远离他人。

听取并遵循您所在州和地方当局的指示。

如果您家中某人的冠状病毒测试呈阳性,

那么全部家庭成员都要待在家中。不要去

上班。不要去上学。联络您的医护人员。
尽己所能

减缓传播

避免随意旅行,

外出购物和社交性访问

总统的美国 冠状病毒指南
保持良好的卫生

洗手,尤其是在触摸任何经常使用的物品或表面之后

避免碰触您的脸部

打喷嚏或咳嗽时使用纸巾,或肘部内侧

尽可能地对经常使用的物品和表面进行消毒

总统的美国 冠状病毒指南
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-41210

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

versus

JOSE RAUL LOPEZ, also known as

Leonardo Leal-Garza,

Defendant-Appellant

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-97-CR-45-1

 

August 21, 2000

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender for the Southern District of Texas

has moved for leave to withdraw as court-appointed counsel for Jose

Raul Lopez and filed the brief required by Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Lopez has filed no brief in response

opposing the motion. 
2

Our review of the brief and our independent review of the

record disclose no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the

motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 17 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 17

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
abolish the electoral college and to provide for the direct election of 
         the President and Vice President of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 2, 2019

     Mr. Schatz (for himself, Mr. Durbin, Mrs. Feinstein, and Mrs. 
 Gillibrand) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
          twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
abolish the electoral college and to provide for the direct election of 
         the President and Vice President of the United States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The President and Vice President shall be elected by 
the people of the several States, the territories, and the district 
constituting the seat of government of the United States.
    ``Section 2. The electors in each State, territory, and the 
district constituting the seat of government of the United States shall 
have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most populous 
branch of the legislature of the State, territory, or the district, 
respectively.
    ``Section 3. Each elector shall cast a single vote for two persons 
who have consented to the joining of their names as candidates for 
President and Vice President.
    ``Section 4. The pair of candidates having the greatest number of 
votes for President and Vice President shall be elected.
    ``Section 5. The times, places, and manner of holding such 
elections and entitlement to inclusion on the ballot shall be 
determined by Congress.
    ``Section 6. The Congress may by law provide for the case of the 
death or any other disqualification of any candidate for President or 
Vice President before the day on which the President-elect or Vice 
President-elect has been chosen; and for the case of a tie in any 
election.
    ``Section 7. This article shall take effect one year after the 
first day of January following ratification.''.
                                 <all>
```
Blazzard, Grodd & Hasenauer, P.C.
943 Post Road East
Westport, CT 06880
(203) 226-7866

April 6, 2000

Board of Directors
Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America
1750 Hennepin Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55403-2195

Re:     Opinion and Consent of Counsel
        Allianz Life Variable Account B

Dear Sir or Madam:

You have requested our Opinion of Counsel in connection with the filing with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, of a Post-Effective  Amendment to a Registration  Statement on Form N-4
for the Individual  Deferred  Variable Annuity Contracts to be issued by Allianz
Life Insurance Company of North America and its separate  account,  Allianz Life
Variable Account B.

We are of the following opinions:

1.   Allianz Life Variable  Account B is a unit investment trust as that term is
     defined in Section 4(2) of the Investment  Company Act of 1940 (the "Act"),
     and is currently  registered  with the Securities and Exchange  Commission,
     pursuant to Section 8(a) of the Act.

2.   Under the  acceptance of purchase  payments made by an Owner  pursuant to a
     Contract  issued  in  accordance  with  the  Prospectus  contained  in  the
     Registration  Statement and upon  compliance  with  applicable law, such an
     Owner will have a legally-issued,  fully-paid,  non-assessable  contractual
     interest under such Contract.

You  may  use  this  opinion  letter,  or  copy  hereof,  as an  exhibit  to the
Registration Statement.

We  consent to the  reference  to our Firm under the  caption  "Legal  Opinions"
contained in the Statement of Additional  Information  which forms a part of the
Registration Statement.

Sincerely,

BLAZZARD, GRODD, & HASENAUER, P.C.

By: /s/ LYNN KORMAN STONE
----------------------------------
        Lynn Korman Stone
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALEJANDRO PEREZ CASTILLO,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND , Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 19

- 71728

Agency No. A200

- 156

- 356

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 16, 2021 * *

Before: GRABER, R. NELSON, and HUNSAKER, Circuit Judges.

Alejandro Perez Castillo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal

and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) and denying his motion

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 22 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 71728

to terminate proc eedings . We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review

for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales , 453

F.3d 1182, 1184

- 85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny the petition for review.

In his opening brief, Perez Castillo does not raise any challenge to the

agency’s determination that he did not suffer past persecution in Mexico. See

Lopez

- Vasquez v. Holder , 706 F.3d 1072, 1079

- 80 (9th Cir. 2013) (issues not

specifically raised and argu ed in a party’s opening brief are waived). Substantial

evidence supports the agency’s determination that Perez Castillo failed to establish

the harm he fears in Mexico would be on account of a protected ground. See

Zetino v. Holder , 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (an applicant’s “desire to be

free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or random violence by gang

members bears no nexus to a protected ground”). Thus, Perez Castillo’s

withholding of removal claim fail s

.

In his opening brief, Perez Castillo also does not raise any challenge to the

agency’s denial of CAT relief or the denial of his motion to terminate

. See Lopez

Vasquez , 706 F.3d at 1079

- 80

.

As stated in the court’s September 9, 2019 order, the temporary s tay of

removal remains in place until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
### **CHAPTER 33—COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT**

Sec.
1451.
Congressional findings.
1452.
Congressional declaration of policy.
1453.
Definitions.
1454.
Submittal of State program for approval.
1455.
Administrative grants.
1455a.
Coastal resource improvement program.
1455b.
Protecting coastal waters.
1456.
Coordination and cooperation.
1456–1.
Authorization of the Coastal and Estuarine Land Conservation Program.
1456a.
Coastal Zone Management Fund.
1456b.
Coastal zone enhancement grants.
1456c.
Technical assistance.
1456d.
Coastal and Estuarine Land Conservation Program.
1457.
Public hearings.
1458.
Review of performance.
1459.
Records and audit.
1460.
Walter B. Jones excellence in coastal zone management awards.
1461.
National Estuarine Research Reserve System.
1462.
Coastal zone management reports.
1463.
Rules and regulations.
1463a.
Omitted.
1463b.
National Coastal Resources Research and Development Institute.
1464.
Authorization of appropriations.
1465.
Appeals to the Secretary.
1466.
Appeals relating to offshore mineral development.
1467.
Establishment of the Digital Coast.
1468.
Regional Ocean Partnerships.
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 10

- 00757

- CR

IN RE Ricardo LOPEZ, Relator

Original Mandamus Proceedings 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Rebecca S immons , Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 17, 2010

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED; MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED AS MOOT

On October 20, 2010 , relator Ricardo Lopez filed a petition for writ of mandamus and

motion for leave to file his mandamus petition. Based on the record before us, we conclude

relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a); Walker v.

Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 839

- 40 (Tex. 1992 ). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus is denied. Relator’ s motion for leave to file the petition for writ of mandamus is

denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2008

- CR

- 7574

, styled The State of Texas v. Ricardo Lopez , pending in the

144th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Catherine Torres

- Stahl presiding.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6228

ALEXANDER WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

C. E. BYERS, Lieutenant; D. T. CALL; DONALD M.

HOFFMAN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-96-818-AM)

Submitted: August 14, 1997 Decided: August 21, 1997

Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alexander Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Williams v. Byers, No. CA-96-818-AM (E.D. Va. Dec. 9, 1996). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 48 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 48

    Expressing support for the designation of October 28, 2020, as 
            ``Honoring the Nation's First Responders Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 30 (legislative day, September 29), 2020

    Ms. Warren (for herself, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Peters, Ms. Rosen, Mr. 
     Johnson, and Mr. Lankford) submitted the following concurrent 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
    Expressing support for the designation of October 28, 2020, as 
            ``Honoring the Nation's First Responders Day''.

Whereas, in the United States, first responders include professional and 
        volunteer firefighters, police officers, emergency medical technicians, 
        and paramedics;
Whereas, according to a 2017 compilation of data on the Emergency Services 
        Sector in the United States by the Department of Homeland Security, 
        ``The first responder community comprises an estimated 4.6 million 
        career and volunteer professionals within five primary disciplines: Law 
        Enforcement, Fire and Rescue Services, Emergency Medical Services, 
        Emergency Management, and Public Works.'';
Whereas first responders deserve to be recognized for their commitment to 
        safety, defense, and honor;
Whereas the people of the United States have depended on the service and 
        sacrifices of first responders during the national emergency relating to 
        the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic; and
Whereas October 28, 2020, would be an appropriate day to establish as ``Honoring 
        the Nation's First Responders Day'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) supports the designation of October 28, 2020, as 
        ``Honoring the Nation's First Responders Day'';
            (2) honors and recognizes the contributions of first 
        responders; and
            (3) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        Honoring the Nation's First Responders Day with appropriate 
        ceremonies and activities that promote awareness of the 
        contributions of first responders in the United States.
                                 <all>
```