alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

Washington, D.C. 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 91910 / May 17, 2021

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension of trading 

in the securities of Traqer Corp. (TAQR) commencing at 9:30 a.m. EDT on May 18, 2021 and 

terminating at 11:59 p.m. EDT on June 1, 2021.

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of the foregoing company due 

to a lack of current and accurate information about the company because it has not filed certain 

periodic reports with the Commission. This order was entered pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act).

The Commission cautions brokers, dealers, shareholders and prospective purchasers that they 

should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available 

information and any information subsequently issued by this company.

Brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11, at 

the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered relating to the securities 

of the subject company unless and until the broker or dealer has strictly complied with all of the 

provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is required by the rule, it 

should refrain from entering quotations relating to the securities of this company that has been 

subject to the trading suspension until such time as it has familiarized itself with the rule and is 

certain that all of its provisions have been met. Any broker or dealer with questions regarding

the rule should contact the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, DC 

at (202) 551-5777. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation which is in violation of the rule,

the Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement action. 

If any broker, dealer or other person has any information which may relate to this matter, they 

should immediately communicate it to the Delinquent Filings Branch of the Division of 

Enforcement at (202) 551-5466, or by e-mail at DelinquentFilings@sec.gov.
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-18-00177-CV 

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF 

SHANNON OLIVER AND RICHARD OLIVER 

 

On Appeal from the 12th District Court 

Walker County, Texas1 

Trial Court No. D1314898, Honorable Donald Kraemer, Presiding 

 

June 19, 2018 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PARKER, JJ. 

Appellant, Richard Oliver, filed a notice of appeal from the Final Decree of Divorce

on March 13, 2018. The clerk’s record was due on April 10, 2018, but was not filed. On 

May 10, 2018, the district clerk notified the Clerk of this Court that Oliver had not made

payment arrangements for the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(a)(2). By letter of 

May 11, 2018, we directed Oliver to make acceptable payment arrangements for the 

 

1By order of the Texas Supreme Court, this appeal was transferred from the Tenth Court of Appeals

to this Court. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West 2013).
2

clerk’s record by May 21. Failure to do so, we admonished, would subject the appeal to 

dismissal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b).

To date, Oliver has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record or filed 

any response to the Court’s letter. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of 

prosecution and because Oliver failed to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules 

and an order of the Court. TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c).

Per Curiam
p.1 

OAR Box 1415 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

8) IV-E-8 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/15/2008 9:38:25 AM Sheet 8 of 130 
P.2 

"A-^-5i 

From:: 

Date: 

Contact 

Compfany: 

Contact Report 

Kenneth R. Meardon 

Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) 

February 18,2002 

Mr. Kurt Anderson, Director EH&S r~ 

Monaco Coach Corporation, Wakarusa, IN I 

Telephone Number: (219) 862-7347 

FaxNramber: (219)862-7313 EPAAIRDOCKHT'^, 

Contact Summary: 

} I contacted Mr. Anderson to clarify the HAP contents of their production rems and gel 

coats amd the type of application equipment used to apply their production resins £ riie- Elkhart, 

Indians?, facility. Mr. Anderson indicated that the production resin used at this facii:y contains 

33% stjyrene (no MMA), for a total HAP content of 33% as applied, and the produnon gel coat 

contaims 32% styrene and 4% MMA, for a total HAP content of 36% as applied. 1.e production. 

gel coast used at the Elkhart facility is a white, pigmented gel coat. Mr. Anderson uied tlaat all 

of their: production resin at the EUchart facility is applied using non-atomized appiisiion 

equipnnenL They use minor amounts of tooling resin at the EUchart facility (appronraaiely one 

gallon jper month) to perform minor repair of molds. If more extensive repair/rewcr. is required, 

the molld is sent of&ite to their tooling facility: 

INFORMATION IS ACCURATE: 

(Please enter name and date) .
### §430h–10. Boundary modification

The boundary of Vicksburg National Military Park is modified to include the property known as Pemberton's Headquarters, as generally depicted on the map entitled "Boundary Map, Pemberton's Headquarters at Vicksburg National Military Park", numbered 306/80015A, and dated August, 2001. The map shall be on file and available for inspection in the appropriate offices of the National Park Service.

(Pub. L. 107–238, §2, Oct. 11, 2002, 116 Stat. 1486.)
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of NorAm Capital Holdings, Inc. (Registrant) for the annual period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Daniel M. Cofall, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1)

This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Registrant.











|                   |                                                                       |                     
|------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------
|Date: May 28, 2010 | By:                                                                   | /s/ Daniel M. Cofall
|                   | Daniel M. Cofall
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7839
NEVELL ROGERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus G. ROBERT DELOACH, III; ALICE C. BROADWATER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofSouth Carolina, at Charleston. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-98-2950-2-10AJ) Submitted: February 25, 1999 Decided: March 10, 1999 Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nevell Rogers, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Nevell Rogers appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Rogers v. Deloach , No. CA-98-2950-2-10AJ (D.S.C. Nov. 25, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 381.207 Pipeline certificate applications. ( a ) *Definition.* For purposes of this section, “pipeline certificate application” means any application for authorization or exemption, any substantial amendment to such an application, and any application, other than an application for a temporary certificate, for authorization to amend an outstanding authorization or exemption, by any person, made pursuant to section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act filed in accordance with § 284.224 of this chapter.
( b ) *Fee.* Unless the Commission orders direct billing under § 381.107 or otherwise, the fee established for a blanket certificate application is $1,000. The fee filed under this paragraph must be submitted in accordance with § 284.224 of this chapter.
( c ) *Effective date.* Any pipeline certificate application filed with the Commission prior to November 4, 1985, is subject to the fees established by part 159 of this chapter to the extent that part 159 applies to such an application.
[Order 433, 50 FR 40346, Oct. 3, 1985, as amended by Order 433-A, 51 FR 43607, Dec. 3, 1986; 52 FR 10367, Apr. 1, 1987; 53 FR 15384, Apr. 29, 1988; 54 FR 12901, Mar. 29, 1989; 55 FR 13901, Apr. 13, 1990; 56 FR 15497, Apr. 17, 1991; 58 FR 2975, Jan. 7, 1993]
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Macromedia, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert K. Burgess, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | the Report, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                       |  |                                                        |  | 
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|Dated: June 14, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ ROBERT K. BURGESS
|                     |  |  |  |                       |  | Robert K. Burgess Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Macromedia, Inc. and will be retained by Macromedia, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification
accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Macromedia, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<LEGEND>
FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

the Harper Group, Inc., and Subsidiaries
(in thousands)

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements from the Company's Annual Report to
Stockholders for the fiscal year ending December 31, 1996, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<S>                                 <C>
<MULTIPLIER>                         1000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  Dec-31-1996
<CASH>                              31522
<SECURITIES>                         6469
<RECEIVABLES>                      201686
<ALLOWANCES>                         4970
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   248670
<PP&E>                             139513
<DEPRECIATION>                      62171
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     393330
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              177004
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                            22627
<OTHER-SE>                         173224
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       393330
<SALES>                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   595433
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      349815
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   216080
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   2658
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     34790
<INCOME-TAX>                        13175
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 21615
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                        21615
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        1.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0
        

</TABLE>
### §460jj–4. Application of State water laws

The jurisdiction of the State of Colorado and the United States over waters of any stream included in the Arapaho National Recreation Area shall be determined by established principles of law. Nothing in this subchapter shall constitute an express or implied claim or denial on the part of the Federal Government as to exemption from State water laws.

(Pub. L. 95–450, §8, Oct. 11, 1978, 92 Stat. 1097.)
### §450ff–5. Administrative jurisdiction of Federal lands

The heads of executive departments may transfer to the Secretary of the Interior, without exchange of funds, administrative jurisdiction over such federally owned lands and other property under their administrative jurisdictions within the revised boundary as may become excess to the needs of their respective agencies, for inclusion in the Fort Vancouver National Historic Site.

(Pub. L. 87–78, §3, June 30, 1961, 75 Stat. 197.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"National Historic Site" substituted in text for "National Monument" in view of redesignation of Fort Vancouver National Monument as Fort Vancouver National Historic Site by Pub. L. 87–78, classified to section 450ff–6 of this title.
Xiro maaskarada wajiga 

oo daboolaysa afkaaga 

iyo sankaaga. Masaafo 

(ugu yaraan 6 fuud) ka 

fogow dadka kale markaad 

awoodid. 

Ku dhaq gacmahaaga 

saabuun iyo biyo in 

badan. Haddii saabuun 

iyo biyo aan la heli karin, 

isticmaal gacmo-nadiifiye 

ku saleysan aalkolo.

Qaadashada tallaalka 

hargabku hadda way ka 

muhiimsan tahay sidii hore. 

Qof kasta oo jira 6 bilood 

ama ka weyn waa inuu 

qaataa tallaalka hargabka 

xilli-cimileed kasta. 

Shaqadaadu waa lama 

huraan!

Ka ilaali naftaada iyo dadka kale hargabka iyo COVID-19 dayrtan iyo jiilaalkan:

XIRO MAASKARO. DHAQ GACMAHA QAADO TALLAALKA 

HARGABKA

Wax dheeri ah ka baro cdc.gov/flu

CS319348-AA

Tallaalka hargabku ayaa adiga, dadka aad jeceshahay, iyo dadka kula shaqeeyaba 

ka badbaadin kara hargabka.

Waxaad sidoo kale badbaadin kartaa dadka hareerahaaga ah haddii aad guriga joogto 

markaad xanuunsan tahay.
### §423l–4. Land acquisition

#### (a) Acquisition authority

#### (1) In general

The Secretary may acquire lands, waters, and interests in lands within the boundaries of the battlefield park from willing landowners by donation, purchase with donated or appropriated funds, or exchange. In acquiring lands and interests in lands under sections 423l–1 to 423l–6 of this title, the Secretary shall acquire the minimum interest necessary to achieve the purposes for which the battlefield is established.

#### (2) Special rule for private lands

Privately owned lands or interests in lands may be acquired under sections 423l–1 to 423l–6 of this title only with the consent of the owner.

#### (b) Easements

#### (1) Outside boundaries

The Secretary may acquire an easement on property outside the boundaries of the battlefield park and around the City of Richmond, with the consent of the owner, if the Secretary determines that the easement is necessary to protect core Civil War resources as identified by the Civil War Sites Advisory Committee. Upon acquisition of the easement, the Secretary shall revise the boundaries of the battlefield park to include the property subject to the easement.

#### (2) Inside boundaries

To the extent practicable, and if preferred by a willing landowner, the Secretary shall use permanent conservation easements to acquire interests in land in lieu of acquiring land in fee simple and thereby removing land from non-Federal ownership.

#### (c) Visitor center

The Secretary may acquire the Tredegar Iron Works buildings and associated land in the City of Richmond for use as a visitor center for the battlefield park.

(Pub. L. 106–511, title V, §504, Nov. 13, 2000, 114 Stat. 2374.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 423l–1 to 423l–6 of this title, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original "this title", meaning title V of Pub. L. 106–511, Nov. 13, 2000, 114 Stat. 2373, which enacted sections 423l–1 to 423l–6 of this title and repealed sections 423j to 423l of this title. For complete classification of title V to the Code, see Tables.
§ 51.58 Representation. ( a ) *Introduction.* This section and the sections that follow set forth factors—in addition to those set forth above—that the Attorney General considers in reviewing redistrictings (see § 51.59), changes in electoral systems (see § 51.60), and annexations (see § 51.61).
( b ) *Background factors.* In making determinations with respect to these changes involving voting practices and procedures, the Attorney General will consider as important background information the following factors: ( 1 ) The extent to which minorities have been denied an equal opportunity to participate meaningfully in the political process in the jurisdiction.
( 2 ) The extent to which voting in the jurisdiction is racially polarized and election-related activities are racially segregated.
( 3 ) The extent to which the voter registration and election participation of minority voters have been adversely affected by present or past discrimination.
[52 FR 490, Jan. 6, 1987, as amended by Order No. 3262-2011, 76 FR 21249, Apr. 15, 2011]
§ 2.63 Quorum and voting requirements. ( a ) A quorum of the Commission consists of the majority of those Commissioners holding office at the time an action is under consideration. Any action authorized by law may be decided by the majority vote of the Commissioners holding office at the time the action is taken. Voting requirements in parole decision-making are established in other provisions of this part, including paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
( b ) ( 1 ) In the event of a tie vote of the Commission's membership on an issue that requires the vote or authorization of the Commission, the issue that is the subject of the vote is not adopted by the Commission.
( 2 ) If the matter that is the subject of the tie vote is whether to reopen or reconsider a previous decision of the Commission, the previous decision shall remain in effect. This includes decisions as to whether to rescind a parole date, to revoke parole or supervised release, or to grant parole after parole has been denied under 18 U.S.C. 4206(d).
( 3 ) If the matter that is the subject of a tie vote is whether to grant parole at any initial hearing, 15-year reconsideration hearing, or D.C. Code rehearing, that decision shall be the Commissioner vote that is in agreement with the hearing examiner panel. If there is a tie vote and no commissioner agrees with the hearing examiner panel, then the decision will be the Commissioner's vote most favorable to the prisoner.
( 4 ) If the matter that is the subject of the tie vote is whether to grant or deny release at the two-thirds date of the sentence per 18 U.S.C. 4206(d), or to terminate parole after the parolee has been on parole for 5 years per 18 U.S.C. 4211(c) and D.C. Code sec. 24-404(a-1)(3), the prisoner must be granted release under the statute or parole must be terminated respectively.
( 5 ) If the matter that is the subject of a tie vote is a decision under appellate review per § 2.26, if no concurrence is reached, the decision under appellate review shall be considered affirmed. This rule also applies to decisions under § 2.17 to remove a case from the original jurisdiction of the Commission.
( 6 ) The Commission may re-vote on a case disposition to resolve a tie vote or other impasse in satisfying a voting requirement of these rules.
( c ) If there is only one Commissioner holding office, all provisions in these rules requiring concurring votes or resolving split decisions are suspended until the membership of the Commission is increased, and any action may be taken by one Commissioner.
[83 FR 58499, Nov. 20, 2018]
§ 115.266 Preservation of ability to protect residents from contact with abusers ( a ) Neither the agency nor any other governmental entity responsible for collective bargaining on the agency's behalf shall enter into or renew any collective bargaining agreement or other agreement that limits the agency's ability to remove alleged staff sexual abusers from contact with residents pending the outcome of an investigation or of a determination of whether and to what extent discipline is warranted.
( b ) Nothing in this standard shall restrict the entering into or renewal of agreements that govern: ( 1 ) The conduct of the disciplinary process, as long as such agreements are not inconsistent with the provisions of §§ 115.272 and 115.276; or
( 2 ) Whether a no-contact assignment that is imposed pending the outcome of an investigation shall be expunged from or retained in the staff member's personnel file following a determination that the allegation of sexual abuse is not substantiated.
MPD

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0188

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

BRANDON BAILEY,

Respondent and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including October 14, 2020, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 8 2020

09/08/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0188