alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 57.1 Responsibility for the conduct of litigation. ( a ) In accord with 28 CFR 0.45(h), civil litigation under sec. 816 of the Department of Defense Appropriation Authorization Act, 1976, 10 U.S.C.A. 2304 note (hereafter the “Act”), shall be conducted under the supervision of the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Civil Division.
( b ) In accord with 28 CFR 0.55(a), prosecution, under section 816(f) of the Act, of criminal violations shall be conducted under the supervision of the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Criminal Division.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B)
10KSB
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          36,843
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,201
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                84,005
<PP&E>                                          21,897
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,826
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  88,076
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,335
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    243,331
<COMMON>                                         9,766
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    88,076
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               401,968
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               324,209
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 77,759
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             77,759
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    77,759
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
### §19e. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 90–209, §1, Dec. 18, 1967, 81 Stat. 656, provided congressional statement of purpose and established National Park Foundation. See section 101111 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
### §410zzz–2. Establishment

When the sites, structures, and other properties authorized for acquisition under section 410zzz of this title and endowment funds in the amount of $100,000 have been transferred to the United States, the Secretary of the Interior shall establish the Saint-Gaudens National Historical Park by publication of notice thereof in the Federal Register. Following such establishment the Secretary may acquire by donation, purchase with donated or appropriated funds, or exchange 279 acres of lands and buildings, or interests therein which he deems necessary for addition to the Saint-Gaudens National Historical Park and which, when acquired, shall become a part of the park.

(Pub. L. 88–543, §3, Aug. 31, 1964, 78 Stat. 749; Pub. L. 94–578, title III, §306, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2735; Pub. L. 106–491, §1(1), Nov. 9, 2000, 114 Stat. 2209; Pub. L. 116–9, title II, §2201(b)(1), (3), Mar. 12, 2019, 133 Stat. 733.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2019—Pub. L. 116–9, §2201(b)(3), substituted "addition to the Saint-Gaudens National Historical Park" for "addition to the national historical site" and "part of the park" for "part of the site".

Pub. L. 116–9, §2201(b)(1), substituted "National Historical Park by publication" for "National Historic Site by publication".

2000—Pub. L. 106–491 substituted "279 acres of lands and buildings, or interests therein" for "not to exceed sixty-four acres of lands and interests therein".

1976—Pub. L. 94–578 inserted at end "Following such establishment the Secretary may acquire by donation, purchase with donated or appropriated funds, or exchange not to exceed sixty-four acres of lands and interests therein which he deems necessary for addition to the national historical site and which, when acquired, shall become a part of the site."
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 99441 / January 29, 2024

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-21103

In the Matter of

Sparkster, Ltd. and Sajjad Daya,

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER APPOINTING 

TAX ADMINISTRATOR

On May 4, 2022, the Commission issued an Omnibus Order Directing the Engagement of 

Two Tax Administrators for Appointment on a Case-By-Case Basis in Administrative 

Proceedings that Establish Distribution Funds (the “Omnibus Order”).1 The Omnibus Order 

engaged Miller Kaplan Arase LLP and Heffler, Radetich & Saitta, LLP to serve as the 

Commission’s tax administrator (“Tax Administrator”), for selection and appointment on an 

individual case basis, for calendar years 2022 through 2024 in administrative proceedings where 

the distribution fund may incur tax-related obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) 

under the Department of the Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

The Director of the Division of Enforcement is authorized to appoint a Tax Administrator 

pursuant to the Omnibus Order.2 The Commission staff has requested the appointment of 

Heffler, Radetich & Saitta, LLP as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced 

proceeding.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the Omnibus Order, Heffler, Radetich & 

Saitta, LLP is appointed as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding. 

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.3

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 94845 (May 4, 2022).

2

 See Delegation of Authority to Director of the Division of Enforcement, Securities Act Rel. No. 10900 (Dec. 10, 

2020).

3

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(ii).
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications.
**Title:****Work-Life Earnings by Field of Degree and Occupation for People  With a Bachelor’s Degree: 2011
Series  Title: *American Community Survey Briefs***Link to: Report |  Link to: Appendix
SuDocs No: 
Item  Number: 
System Number: 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  September 24,  2016  Page Name:  http://permanent.fdlp.gov/
 **** |
|--|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**
I, Mark A. Kopser, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of United SurgicalPartners International, Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;  4.  The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theRegistrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the Registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b)  Designed such internal control over financialreporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  d)  Disclosed in this report any change in theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the Registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
 5.  The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theRegistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information;and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significantrole in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting. /s/ Mark A. Kopser Mark A. Kopser
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's financial statements for years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                        <C>              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     YEAR             YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996      DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996      DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          22,667           12,862
<SECURITIES>                                       152              400
<RECEIVABLES>                                   72,482           69,911
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,886            2,251
<INVENTORY>                                     33,464           42,296
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               148,403          145,742
<PP&E>                                         219,202          364,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 118,745          198,891
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 454,731          474,650
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          144,711          121,070
<BONDS>                                        114,075          114,574
<COMMON>                                        37,907           37,907
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                0
<OTHER-SE>                                     144,496          184,240
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   454,731          474,650
<SALES>                                        609,384          561,617
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               609,384          561,617
<CGS>                                          327,162          302,660
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  327,162          302,660
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,330            8,714
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (15,477)          76,903
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,623)          30,886
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (13,854)          46,017
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                0
<CHANGES>                                            0                0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (13,854)          46,017
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.45)            1.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.45)            1.50



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 53 (Friday, March 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 14970]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6404]



[[Page 14970]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[Docket<greek-i> EPA-RO4-SFUND-2011-0278, FRL-9284-1]


National Starch and Chemical Company, Salisbury, Rowan County, 
NC; Notice of Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of settlement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under Section 122(h)(1) of the Comprehensive Environmental 
Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States 
Environmental Protection Agency has entered into a settlement for 
reimbursement of past response costs concerning the National Starch and 
Chemical Company Site located in Mobile, Mobile County, Alabama for 
publication.

DATES: The Agency will consider public comments on the settlement until 
April 18, 2011. The Agency will consider all comments received and may 
modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received 
disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the settlement is 
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the settlement are available from Ms. Paula V. 
Painter. Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-RO4-
SFUND-2011-0278 or Site name National Starch and Chemical Company 
Superfund Site by one of the following methods:
    <bullet> http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line 
instructions for submitting comments.
    <bullet> http://www.epa.gov/region4/waste/sf/enforce.htm
    <bullet> E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#316150585f4554431f6150445d50715441501f565e47"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="78281911160c1d0a5628190d1419381d0819561f170e">[email protected]</span></a>

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula V. Painter at 404/562-8887.

    Dated: March 4, 2011.
Anita L. Davis,
Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Superfund 
Division.
[FR Doc. 2011-6404 Filed 3-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 549.61 Definition. As defined in this rule, an inmate is on a *hunger strike:* ( a ) When he or she communicates that fact to staff and is observed by staff to be refraining from eating for a period of time, ordinarily in excess of 72 hours; or
( b ) When staff observe the inmate to be refraining from eating for a period in excess of 72 hours. When staff consider it prudent to do so, a referral for medical evaluation may be made without waiting 72 hours.
§ 68.19 Written interrogatories to parties. ( a ) Any party may serve upon any other party written interrogatories to be answered in writing by the party served, or if the party served is a public or private corporation or a partnership or association or governmental agency, by any authorized officer or agent, who shall furnish such information as is available to the party. A copy of the interrogatories shall be served on all parties to the proceeding.
( b ) Each interrogatory shall be answered separately and fully in writing under oath or affirmation, unless it is objected to, in which event the reasons of objection shall be stated in lieu of an answer. The answers and objections shall be signed by the person making them. The party upon whom the interrogatories were served shall serve a copy of the answer or objections upon all parties to the proceeding within thirty (30) days after service of the interrogatories, or within such shorter or longer period as the Administrative Law Judge upon motion may allow.
( c ) An interrogatory otherwise proper is not necessarily objectionable merely because an answer to the interrogatory involves an opinion or contention that relates to fact or the application of law to fact, but the Administrative Law Judge may upon motion order that such an interrogatory need not be answered until after designated discovery has been completed or until a prehearing conference or other later time.
( d ) A person or entity upon whom interrogatories are served may respond by the submission of business records, indicating to which interrogatory the documents respond, if they are sufficient to answer said interrogatories.
[54 FR 48596, Nov. 24, 1989. Redesignated by Order No. 1534-91, 56 FR 50053, Oct. 3, 1991]
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

APRIL 8, 2010

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 09-13622

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 01-00008-CR-3-RV

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WALTER DEVON GRANDISON,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

_________________________

(April 8, 2010)

Before BLACK, PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
Walter Grandison, proceeding pro se, appeals the sentence imposed by the

district court following its grant of a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2). On appeal, Grandison argues the district court erred in determining

the extent of his sentence reduction under § 3582(c)(2) because it failed to consider

the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. Grandison contends the court’s failure to consider

the § 3553(a) factors indicates it might not have appreciated the extent of its

discretion to impose a lower sentence in light of the relevant factors. After review,

we affirm.

1

Here, the district court granted Grandison’s § 3582(c)(2) motion and

sentenced him to 324 months’ imprisonment, the lowest end of the amended

guideline range of 324-365 months’ imprisonment. The district court failed to

explicitly state it considered the § 3553(a) factors. See United States v. Douglas,

576 F.3d 1216, 1219 (11th Cir. 2009) (“[I]f it is not possible to determine from the

record whether the district court considered the § 3553(a) factors, we must vacate

and remand the case to the district court.” ). Even if the court erred by not

considering the § 3553(a) factors, such error was harmless because the district

court lacked the authority to sentence Grandison below the amended guideline

We review a district court’s decision whether to reduce a sentence under § 3582(c)(2) 1

for abuse of discretion and its conclusions regarding the scope of its legal authority de novo. 

United States v. Williams, 549 F.3d 1337, 1338 (11th Cir. 2008). 

2
range sentence. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(b)(2)(A) (stating that, generally, the court

“shall not reduce the defendant’s term of imprisonment under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) and this policy statement to a term that is less than the minimum of

the amended guideline range”); United States v. Melvin, 556 F.3d 1190, 1193-94

(11th Cir. 2009) (holding the district court erred in sentencing the defendant below

the amended guideline range in violation of the guidelines policy statements), cert.

denied, 129 S. Ct. 2382 (2009).

AFFIRMED.

3