alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 72 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 72

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   Providing for the reappointment of Michael M. Lynton as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 
reason of the expiration of the term of Michael M. Lynton of California 
is filled by the reappointment of the incumbent. The reappointment is 
for a term of 6 years, beginning on the later of September 29, 2020, or 
the date of the enactment of this joint resolution.

            Passed the Senate May 20, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             S. J. RES. 72

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

   Providing for the reappointment of Michael M. Lynton as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.
```
§ 115.112 Contracting with other entities for the confinement of detainees. ( a ) A law enforcement agency that contracts for the confinement of its lockup detainees in lockups operated by private agencies or other entities, including other government agencies, shall include in any new contract or contract renewal the entity's obligation to adopt and comply with the PREA standards.
( b ) Any new contract or contract renewal shall provide for agency contract monitoring to ensure that the contractor is complying with the PREA standards.
#### § 115.172 Evidentiary standard for administrative investigations.

The agency shall impose no standard higher than a preponderance of the evidence in determining whether allegations of sexual abuse or sexual harassment are substantiated.
§ 3b.226 Accounting of disclosures. ( a ) The appropriate system manager specified for each system of records will keep an accurate written account of all disclosures of records made to any person or to any other agency with the written consent or at the written request of the individual to whom the record pertains and pursuant to § 3b.225(b)(3) through (11). The account will include the following information: ( 1 ) The date, nature, and purpose of each disclosure;
( 2 ) The name and address of the person or agency to whom the disclosure is made; and
( 3 ) A reference to the justification or basis upon which the release was made, including reference to any written document required as when records are released for statistical or law enforcement purposes pursuant to § 3b.225(b) (5) and (7).
( b ) Each system manager will retain the accounting made under paragraph (a) of this section for at least five years from the date of disclosure for which the accounting is made, or the life of the record, which ever is longer.
( c ) Except for disclosures made for law enforcement purposes pursuant to § 3b.225(b)(7), and unless the system of records has been exempted from this provision pursuant to subpart D of this part, each system manager will make the accounting made under paragraph (a) of this section available to the individual named in the record at his written request.
( d ) The accounting of disclosures is not a system of records under the definition in § 3b.2(e) and no accounting will be maintained for disclosure of the accounting of disclosures.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Granite Cliffs Incorporated,
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"),  the undersigned,  B.
Stephen Bailey,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge  and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NO. 07-08-0252-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

AUGUST 5, 2008

______________________________

JAN MURRAY McDONALD, APPELLANT

V.

WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL AS TRUSTEE, ET AL., APPELLEES

_________________________________

FROM THE 181ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

NO. 58985B; HONORABLE JOHN B. BOARD, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Proceeding pro se, Appellant, Jan Murray McDonald, brought this appeal from the

trial court’s final summary judgment in favor of Appellees, Wells Fargo Bank National as

Trustee, et al. (Wells Fargo). Pending before this Court is Wells Fargo’s Motion to Dismiss

for Want of Jurisdiction by which it contends that McDonald’s notice of appeal was

untimely. We agree and grant the motion and dismiss.
2

Final summary judgment was signed by the trial court on March 12, 2008.

McDonald filed a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law on March 28, 2008.

He then filed his notice of appeal on June 9, 2008. Wells Fargo filed its motion to dismiss

on June 27, 2008. By letter dated July 10, 2008, this Court advised McDonald of the

untimely notice and directed that he demonstrate why this appeal should not be dismissed

for want of jurisdiction on or before July 21, 2008. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). McDonald did

not respond.

A notice of appeal is due within thirty days after judgment is signed. Tex. R. App.

P. 26.1. The deadline is extended to ninety days under certain circumstances. Tex. R.

App. P. 26.1(a). One of those circumstances is timely filing a request for findings of fact

and conclusions of law “if findings and conclusions either are required by the Rules of Civil

Procedure or, if not required, could properly be considered by the appellate court;”

(emphasis added). Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a)(4). However, findings of fact and conclusions

of law are not proper in reviewing a summary judgment and do not extend the time in which

to file a notice of appeal from thirty days to ninety days. See Linwood v. NCNB Texas, 885

S.W.2d 102, 103 (Tex. 1994). See also IKB Industries Ltd. v. Pro-Line Corp., 938 S.W.2d

440, 443 (Tex. 1997).

The summary judgment was signed on March 12, 2008, making the notice of appeal

due on or before April 11, 2008. The notice of appeal filed on June 9, 2008, eighty-nine
3

days after judgment was signed, is untimely. Consequently, this Court lacks jurisdiction

to review McDonald’s appeal.

Accordingly, Wells Fargo National Bank as Trustee, et al.’s Motion to Dismiss for

Want of Jurisdiction is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Patrick A. Pirtle

 Justice
### §407b. Applicability of Federal Power Act

The provisions of the Federal Power Act [16 U.S.C. 791a et seq.] shall not apply to or extend over the land by section 407 of this title or hereafter reserved and dedicated as the Carlsbad Caverns National Park.

(May 14, 1930, ch. 272, §3, 46 Stat. 279.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Power Act, referred to in text, was in the original the "Act of June 10, 1920, known as the Federal Water Power Act," and was redesignated as the Federal Power Act by section 791a of this title. The Federal Power Act is act June 10, 1920, ch. 285, 41 Stat. 1063, and is classified generally to chapter 12 (§791aet seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 791a of this title and Tables.
###### Editorial Note on Part 0

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

#### § 0.119 Organization.

The Office of Community Oriented Policing Services shall be headed by a Director appointed by the Attorney General. The Director shall report to the Attorney General through the Associate Attorney General.
Vii:MOMPEIFA rl IFTP=MtC: 141 '-- 

court's docket. Appellant may file a notice of appeal once a judgment of 

conviction has been entered. See NRS 177.015(3); NRAP 4(b)(1)(A). We 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

Hardesty 

Parraguirre Li Cherry 

cc: Hon. James M. Bixler, District Judge 

Joseph P. Reiff 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

William E. Ferguson 

,J. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-20571

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GERARDO ZAVALA-AMADOR, also known as Gerardo Zavala, also known as 

Gerardo Amador Zavala, also known as Geraro Amador Zavala, also known as 

Rogelio Ayala-Garcia,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:13-CR-323-1

Before PRADO, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Gerardo Zavala-Amador appeals the 57-month sentence imposed 

following his conviction for illegal reentry. He contends that the district court 

erred in treating his prior conviction for indecency with a child under Texas 

Penal Code § 21.11(a)(1) as a crime of violence within the meaning of U.S.S.G. 

§ 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) and an aggravated felony within the meaning of 8 U.S.C. 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 8, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-20571 Document: 00512860773 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/08/2014
No. 13-20571

§ 1101(a)(43). His arguments are foreclosed by our decisions in United States 

v. Elizondo-Hernandez, 755 F.3d 779, 781-82 (5th Cir. 2014), and United States 

v. Rodriguez, 711 F.3d 541, 560, 562 n.28 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 134 

S. Ct. 512 (2013).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 13-20571 Document: 00512860773 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/08/2014
### §§1021 to 1023. Repealed. Pub. L. 102–567, title VIII, §814, Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4316, and Pub. L. 102–587, title VIII, §8014, Nov. 4, 1992, 106 Stat. 5106

Section 1021, acts Aug. 12, 1954, ch. 669, §2, 68 Stat. 698; July 28, 1978, Pub. L. 95–326, §1(1), 92 Stat. 399, defined terms used in this chapter.

Section 1022, acts Aug. 12, 1954, ch. 669, §3, 68 Stat. 698; Oct. 9, 1972, Pub. L. 92–471, title I, §108(a), 86 Stat. 786; July 28, 1978, Pub. L. 95–326, §1(2)(A), 92 Stat. 399, related to United States Commissioners to International North Pacific Fisheries Commission.

Section 1023, acts Aug. 12, 1954, ch. 669, §4, 68 Stat. 698; Oct. 9, 1972, Pub. L. 92–471, title I, §108(b), 86 Stat. 787; July 28, 1978, Pub. L. 95–326, §1(3), 92 Stat. 400, related to advisory committee.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Act Aug. 12, 1954, ch. 669, §1, 68 Stat. 698, which provided that such Act was to be cited as the "North Pacific Fisheries Act of 1954", was repealed by Pub. L. 102–567, title VIII, §814, Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4316, and Pub. L. 102–587, title VIII, §8014, Nov. 4, 1992, 106 Stat. 5106.
#### § 51.42 Failure of the Attorney General to respond.

It is the practice and intention of the Attorney General to respond in writing to each submission within the 60-day period. However, the failure of the Attorney General to make a written response within the 60-day period constitutes preclearance of the submitted change, provided that a 60-day review period had commenced after receipt by the Attorney General of a complete submission that is appropriate for a response on the merits. (*See* § 51.22, § 51.27, § 51.35.)

[Order No. 3262-2011, 76 FR 21247, Apr. 15, 2011]
In connection with the Annual Report of Harrell Hospitality Group, Inc (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company does hereby certify that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Paul L. Barham ----------------------------

Paul L. Barham (Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer)
#### § 5.307 Exemption under 3(h) of the Act.

For the purpose of section 3(h) of the Act, the burden of establishing that registration under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1601 *et seq.* (LDA), has been made shall fall upon the person claiming the exemption. The Department of Justice will accept as prima facie evidence of registration a duly executed registration statement filed pursuant to the LDA. In no case where a foreign government or foreign political party is the principal beneficiary will the exemption under 3(h) be recognized.

[Order No. 2674-2003, 68 FR 33631, June 5, 2003]
§ 301.301 Compensable and noncompensable injuries. ( a ) No compensation for work-related injuries resulting in physical impairment shall be paid prior to an inmate's release.
( b ) Compensation may only be paid for work-related injuries or claims alleging improper medical treatment of a work-related injury. This ordinarily includes only those injuries suffered during the performance of an inmate's regular work assignment. However, injuries suffered during the performance of voluntary work in the operation or maintenance of the institution, when such work has been approved by staff, may also be compensable.
( c ) Compensation is not paid for injuries sustained during participation in institutional programs (such as programs of a social, recreational, or community relations nature) or from maintenance of one's own living quarters. Furthermore, compensation shall not be paid for injuries suffered away from the work location (e.g., while the claimant is going to or leaving work, or going to or coming from lunch outside of the work station or area).
( d ) Injuries sustained by inmate workers willfully or with intent to injure someone else, or injuries suffered in any activity not related to the actual performance of the work assignment are not compensable, and no claim for compensation for such injuries will be approved. Willful violation of rules and regulations may result in denial of compensation for any resulting injury.
----

| Delaware                                                          |   | 000-23143               |   | 13-3379479                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
| (State or other jurisdictionof incorporation)                     |   | (CommissionFile Number) |   | (IRS EmployerIdentification No.) |
|                                                              |   |                    |   |                             |
| 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, New York                  |   | 10591                   |
| (Address of principal executive offices)                          |   | (Zip Code)              |
| Registrant's telephone number, including area code (914) 789-2800 |
| o | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|---|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| o | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|---|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|---|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
|---|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

| Item 2.02. | Results of Operations and Financial Condition. |
|------------|------------------------------------------------|
| Item 9.01. | Financial Statements and Exhibits. |
|------------|------------------------------------|
| (d)   | Exhibits |
|-----------------|----------|
| Exhibit No. | Description |
|-------------|-------------|
| 99.1 | Press Release dated May 6, 2015. |
|------|----------------------------------|

----

|   | PROGENICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. |
|--------|---------------------------------|
|   | By:                             | /s/ ANGELO W. LOVALLO, JR. |
|   |                            | Angelo W. Lovallo, Jr. |
|   |                            | Vice President, Finance & Treasurer |
|   |                            | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7686

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CLINTON GRAY CLINE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. Hiram H. Ward, Senior

District Judge. (CR-89-145-WS, CA-96-246-6)

Submitted: October 31, 1997 Decided: November 21, 1997

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clinton Gray Cline, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Cannon, Assistant

United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his

motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28

U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United

States v. Cline, Nos. CR-89-145-WS; CA-96-246-6 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 11,

1996). See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 65 U.S.L.W. 4557 (U.S.

June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Cite as State ex rel. Norris v. Giavasis, 100 Ohio St.3d 371, 2003-Ohio-6609.]

[THE STATE EX REL.] NORRIS, APPELLANT, v. GIAVASIS, CLERK, ET AL.,

APPELLEES. 

[Cite as State ex rel. Norris v. Giavasis, 100 Ohio St.3d 371, 2003-Ohio-6609.] 

Mandamus — Writ sought to compel common pleas court clerk to remove 

entries from the court’s appearance docket — Court of appeals’ 

dismissal of complaint affirmed.

(No. 2003-1478 — Submitted December 2, 2003 — Decided December 31, 

2003.) 

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Stark County, No. 2003CA00268. 

__________________ 

Per Curiam. 

{¶1} On July 24, 2003, appellant, Robert Lee Norris, an inmate, filed a 

complaint in the Court of Appeals for Stark County. Norris sought a writ of 

mandamus to compel appellees, Stark County Common Pleas Court Clerk Phil G. 

Giavasis and Deputy Clerk A. Gifford, to remove from their records “the July 11, 

2003 Appearance Docket and each of its entries” and to retain “the certified ‘June 

25, 2002’ Appearance Docket.” The docket entries were of his criminal case 

stemming from a 1992 indictment. 

{¶2} Norris filed an affidavit that he claimed listed his prior “civil 

actions and criminal appeals within the preceding (5) five years pursuant to [R.C.] 

2969.25.” The affidavit, however, did not contain a “brief description of the 

nature” of each civil action or appeal and the outcome of each civil action and 

appeal. R.C. 2969.25(A)(1) and (4). And although Norris requested a waiver of 

the filing fees assessed by the court of appeals based on his claimed indigency, his 

affidavit of indigency did not contain the statement required by R.C. 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

2 

2969.25(C)(1) setting forth the balance in his inmate account “for each of the 

preceding six months, as certified by the institutional cashier.” 

{¶3} On August 1, 2003, the court of appeals sua sponte dismissed 

Norris’s complaint. 

{¶4} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. “The 

requirements of R.C. 2969.25 are mandatory, and failure to comply with them 

subjects an inmate’s action to dismissal.” State ex rel. White v. Bechtel, 99 Ohio 

St.3d 11, 2003-Ohio-2262, 788 N.E.2d 634, ¶ 5. Norris failed to comply with 

R.C. 2969.25(A) and 2969.25(C)(1). State ex rel. Kimbro v. Glavas, 97 Ohio 

St.3d 197, 2002-Ohio-5808, 777 N.E.2d 257, ¶ 2; White, 99 Ohio St.3d 11, 2003-

Ohio-2262, 788 N.E.2d 634, ¶ 2, 5. 

Judgment affirmed. 

 MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON,

O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., concur. 

__________________ 

 Robert Lee Norris, pro se. 

__________________