U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office

Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800

Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001

94–587 PDF 2015

S. HRG. 111–1193 

HEARING ON THE NOMINATION OF 

VICTOR M. MENDEZ TO BE ADMINISTRATOR 

OF THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION 

HEARING 

BEFORE THE

COMMITTEE ON 

ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS 

UNITED STATES SENATE 

ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION 

JUNE 2, 2009 

Printed for the use of the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

( 

Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys 
(II) 

COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS 

ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION 

BARBARA BOXER, California, Chairman 

MAX BAUCUS, Montana 

THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware 

FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey 

BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland 

BERNARD SANDERS, Vermont 

AMY KLOBUCHAR, Minnesota 

SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, Rhode Island 

TOM UDALL, New Mexico 

JEFF MERKLEY, Oregon 

KIRSTEN GILLIBRAND, New York 

ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania 

JAMES M. INHOFE, Oklahoma 

GEORGE V. VOINOVICH, Ohio 

DAVID VITTER, Louisiana 

JOHN BARRASSO, Wyoming 

MIKE CRAPO, Idaho 

CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri 

LAMAR ALEXANDER, Tennessee 

BETTINA POIRIER, Staff Director 

RUTH VAN MARK, Minority Staff Director 
(III) 

C O N T E N T S 

Page 

JUNE 2, 2009 

OPENING STATEMENTS 

Boxer, Hon. Barbara, U.S. Senator from the State of California ........................ 1 

Kyl, Hon. Jon, U.S. Senator from the State of Arizona ........................................ 2 

Inhofe, Hon. James M., U.S. Senator from the State of Oklahoma .................... 4 

Voinovich, Hon. George V., U.S. Senator from the State of Ohio ........................ 6 

Klobuchar, Hon. Amy, U.S. Senator from the State of Minnesota ...................... 8 

Bond, Hon. Christopher S., U.S. Senator from the State of Missouri ................. 9 

Cardin, Hon. Benjamin L., U.S. Senator from the State of Maryland, prepared 

statement .............................................................................................................. 52 

WITNESS 

Mendez, Victor M., nominated to be Administrator, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation ................................................... 10 

Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 13 

Response to an additional question from Senator Boxer .............................. 16 

Responses to additional questions from: 

Senator Carper .......................................................................................... 17 

Senator Cardin .......................................................................................... 18 

Senator Sanders ........................................................................................ 20 

Response to an additional question from Senator Whitehouse .................... 21 

Responses to additional questions from: 

Senator Udall ............................................................................................. 23 

Senator Inhofe ........................................................................................... 28 

Senator Voinovich ..................................................................................... 31 

Response to an additional question from: 

Senator Vitter ............................................................................................ 34 

Senator Crapo ............................................................................................ 35 

Responses to additional questions from Senator Bond ................................. 36 

(1) 

HEARING ON THE NOMINATION OF VICTOR 

M. MENDEZ TO BE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE 

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION 

TUESDAY, JUNE 2, 2009 

U.S. SENATE, 

COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS, 

Washington, DC. 

The full Committee met, pursuant to notice, at 10 a.m. in room 

406, Dirksen Senate Office Building, Hon. Barbara Boxer (chairman of the full Committee) presiding. 

Present: Senators Carper, Inhofe, Lautenberg, Voinovich, Bond, 

Klobuchar, Udall, and Merkley. 

OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. BARBARA BOXER, 

U.S. SENATOR FROM THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

Senator BOXER. The hearing will come to order. Oh, nice to see 

you, Senator Kyl. 

I want to welcome you, Mr. Mendez. 

Today we are holding a hearing on the nomination of Victor M. 

Mendez to be the Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration. I would like to thank Mr. Mendez for being here today and 

I welcome him to the Committee. 

FHWA is an agency of the Department of Transportation that is 

charged with oversight of several programs, the largest of which, 

the Federal Aid Highway Program, provides funding to the States 

to assist in constructing highways and making highways and traffic 

operations safe and more efficient. 

Another major program overseen by the FHWA is the Federal 

Lands Highway Program through which FHWA works with the 

Federal Land Management Agencies and Indian tribes to manage 

the approximately 300,000 mile road network that serves Federal 

and Indian lands. 

Combined, these programs are maintained at about $40 billion a 

year. States depend on this Federal funding. Traditionally, the 

Federal Government has provided about 40 percent of the Nation’s 

total investment in transportation. Without continued funding, 

States would have to make significant cuts to their already underfunded transportation programs. 

Highways and bridges built in the 1950s and 1960s are reaching 

the end of their expected service life and additional funding is 

needed for major repair or replacement. Similarly, transit systems 

are aging and many communities are in need of new or expanded 

service. 
2 

This means we need to make significant investment in the short 

term just to maintain our infrastructure at safe levels, followed by 

even larger investments over the next 20 to 30 years to completely 

replace aging infrastructure and accommodate expected growth in 

population. 

A key issue for the next Administrator will be management of 

dwindling resources in the Highway Trust Fund, which supplies 

most of the funding that FHWA administers. According to DOT, 

and this is really not good news for all of us, the Highway Trust 

Fund is expected to have insufficient cash by August of this year 

to make good on prior commitments. Therefore, an additional $5 

billion to $7 billion will be needed to keep the Highway Trust Fund 

solvent through the end of this fiscal year. 

In addition, Administration officials have estimated that an additional $8 billion to $10 billion is needed to pay immediate cash 

needs if the overall program is to be maintained at current funding 

levels. 

The need to maintain a sustainable funding source for our critical infrastructure must be a central focus of all of our efforts 

across party lines. And I am happy to say that in this Committee 

we do work very strongly across party lines on these issues. We all 

know that investment in transportation is crucial to our prosperity 

and we all know it creates jobs. 

The current highway transit and highway safety authorization, 

SAFETEA-LU, expires at the end of fiscal year 2009. Additional 

revenue will be needed to merely maintain existing programs and 

much more will be needed if we want to provide additional resources to our States which are struggling to improve existing infrastructure. 

The Committee is working on a new bill called MAP-21, Moving 

Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century. This bill gives us the opportunity to take a fresh look at the current program and make the 

transformational changes necessary to ensure our Nation’s system 

will meet the needs as we move forward. 

This Committee, working across party lines, has agreed to about 

eight principles for the new bill and we will look forward to working with you, Mr. Mendez, as we get to reauthorize the transportation programs of our Nation. We really do look forward to your 

working with us. 

So, thank you very much for appearing before this Committee. I 

certainly look forward to hearing from you. I will call on Senator 

Inhofe and then, if no other Senators are here by then, we will go 

right to Senator Kyl for the introduction. 

Senator INHOFE. Madam Chairman, it is all right with me, it 

would be OK to have Senator Kyl go ahead with the introduction, 

because he has another commitment that he needs to take care of. 

Senator BOXER. Sure. 

Senator Kyl, please proceed. 

OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. JON KYL, 

U.S. SENATOR FROM THE STATE OF ARIZONA 

Senator KYL. Thank you, Madam Chairman. And thank you, 

members of the Committee. 
3 

Incidentally, Madam Chairman, I compliment you for coming up 

with a much better name that some of the previous names. That 

MAP-21 sounds good to me. 

Senator BOXER. Well, can I quickly tell you a funny story? I was 

telling my husband how the name SAFETEA-LU came into play. 

It had to do with one of our colleagues’ spouses whose name is 

Lulu. I said to my husband, I have bad news and good news for 

you. He said what is the bad news? I said, can you believe that we 

named the highway bill after somebody’s wife? And he said so what 

is the good news? And I said I am going to name it SAFETEA-STU, 

after him. 

[Laughter.] 

Senator BOXER. He said he would absolutely destroy me limb 

from limb if I did it. So, we went to MAP-21. 

[Laughter.] 

Senator KYL. Thank you, Madam Chairman. 

It is my pleasure to introduce Victor Mendez, the President’s 

nominee to serve as Administrator with the Federal Highway Administration. 

Victor will bring a wealth of experience to FHWA, primarily from 

his years of experience at the Arizona Department of Transportation. We call it ADOT, and that is where I got to know Victor. 

He joined ADOT in 1985 as a civil engineer and quickly worked his 

way up through the ranks. By 2001, Victor was appointed by thenGovernor Janet Napolitano as Director of ADOT and served in that 

capacity until February of this year. 

As Director, Victor led an organization of over 4,600 employees with an annual operating budget of approximately $430 million. 

The 5-year capital budget consisting primarily of highway projects 

was approximately $6 billion in State and Federal funds. It needs 

to be much more than that, incidentally, I would mention to my 

two colleagues. 

The transportation issues that Arizona faced during Victor’s tenure, population growth, outdated infrastructure, funding obstacles, 

prepared him well for his role as Administrator of FHWA. Instead 

of maintaining the status quo, Victor has had the vision to implement many new financing, technological and research methodologies that were used to meet many of Arizona’s transportation challenges. 

For instance, Victor successfully accelerated the construction 

schedule for the Valley Regional Freeway System in the Phoenix 

area, advancing the project’s completion from 2014 to 2007. He also 

led the Arizona management of the construction of the Hoover Dam 

Bypass Bridge with Nevada and the United States Department of 

Transportation. The Hoover Damn Bypass Bridge is a $241 million 

project that has transportation security and trade implications. 

With Victor’s leadership, the project is on budget and expected to 

be completed next year. 

I have no doubt that Victor will continue to utilize innovative 

methods to ensure that our Nation’s transportation infrastructure 

needs are met. 

And to the point you made, Madam Chairman, we discussed the 

financing issues that he will necessarily face. He has got a lot of 

ideas and he does not think we can rely on one silver bullet. He 
4 

says there are a whole variety of things that have to be utilized. 

So, I know you will be working with him on that. 

Finally, to round out his transportation experience and demonstrate other things that he has been willing to do in his work for 

the State of Arizona, he also served as President of the American 

Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials and cochaired the Transportation Infrastructure and Ports Committee of 

the Arizona-Mexico Commission, which in Arizona is a big deal. 

In 2008, Victor was elected as Leader of the Year in Public Policy 

in Transportation by the Arizona Capitol Times. So he is recognized as a leader, and I commend the President for choosing such 

a fine candidate and congratulate Victor on his nomination. 

I look forward to working with him and commend him to the 

Committee. 

Thank you, Madam Chairman, for your courtesy. 

Senator BOXER. Thank you very much, Senator, and we know 

that you have places to go so please have a good day and we will 

see you on the floor of the Senate. 

Senator KYL. Thank you. 

Senator BOXER. Senator Inhofe. 

OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. JAMES M. INHOFE, 

U.S. SENATOR FROM THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA 

Senator INHOFE. Madam Chairman, I have the same problem 

that I always have on Tuesday mornings. We have the Armed 

Services Committee hearing. We have General McChrystal there, 

and it is imperative that I be in both places. 

I want to welcome Mr. Mendez. I have had a chance to talk to 

him in my office and we have a lot of mutual friends, one of which 

is our Secretary of Transportation, Gary Ridley. I have often said 

that Gary Ridley, in my opinion, is the best Transportation Secretary in America. I highly respect his opinions, and he holds Mr. 

Mendez in very, very high regard. I think we are fortunate. I agree 

with Senator Kyl, we are fortunate that the President has chosen 

to nominate Victor Mendez to this position. 

The challenges in continuing to provide the safe and free transportation network have really never been greater. We went through 

a problem last fall where we came up with a shortfall, and that 

shortfall came from the fact that the increase in the fuel causes a 

decrease in the revenues that are directed to the Highway Trust 

Fund. A lot of people think it is a percentage, but it is not, it is 

a centage. So that was a problem. 

We were able to correct that problem by going and undoing 

something that should not have been done in 1998 when Senator 

Clinton took $8 billion from the Trust Fund and put it into the 

General Fund. When I look at that, I think that took care of the 

crisis then. We have another crisis now. 

I think there are a couple of things that we can do. I just offer 

this, not necessarily asking any questions since I probably will not 

be here during the question and answer time. One is we were successful in getting that, but that was $8 billion and that did not include the interest over a 10-year period. We have a figure calculated for that right now which should be very helpful. The second 

thing is that, with the unprecedented spending that has never hap-
5 

pened before in the history of this Country, the hundreds of billions 

of dollars, I cannot believe that we have such a low priority on infrastructure. So, it is complicated. And the reauthorization is set to 

expire, as the Chairman said, in October. 

Solving these challenges will require us all to work together. Unfortunately, there was a troubling development 2 weeks ago. This 

Administration hosted a conference call about the status of the 

Highway Trust Fund, sharing new technical information about the 

inability of the Trust Fund to make required reimbursements to 

States. The White House set up this conference call and only invited Democrat staff to participate. This is unacceptable. 

One of the things that I would ask you, and I ask everyone that 

is nominated, would you commit to responding to the minority side 

the same as you would respond to any request that comes from the 

majority side during your tenure after you are confirmed, which 

you will be? 

[Mr. Mendez responds in the affirmative.] 

Senator INHOFE. Let the record reflect that he said yes. 

All right. I look forward to working with you. We have a huge 

problem in front of us. It is something that is insurmountable. As 

often as Chairman Boxer and I disagree on many issues, we agree 

on the infrastructure. And the problem that we have in this Country is that it is not enjoying the high priority that it should enjoy. 

We were proud of the amount of money that we were able to get 

in the 2005 Reauthorization Bill, but, in retrospect, that really just 

barely maintained what we already had. I agree with the two Governors and Mayor Bloomberg who are coming up with ideas on 

really getting a more robust bill. I think if we are going to be able 

to face the problems that are out there, we are going to have to 

think in bigger numbers. But we have to get there. 

I look forward to your testimony and your confirmation. 

[The prepared statement of Senator Inhofe follows:] 

STATEMENT OF HON. JAMES M. INHOFE, U.S. SENATOR

FROM THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA

Thank you, Chairman Boxer. I would like to welcome Mr. Mendez. I have met 

with this nominee and I believe after our conversation that he is well qualified for 

this important position. The Federal Highway Administrator has always been a valuable partner of this Committee during the re-authorization process and I expect 

that this next bill will be no different. 

I am pleased that the Administration has chosen such a qualified individual, and 

someone who recognizes the diverse transportation needs of this country. Heavily 

weighing in your favor was a conversation I had with my State’s Secretary of Transportation, Gary Ridley, who proudly relayed his support of your nomination. I greatly respect the opinion of Secretary Ridley, whom I believe is the best Transportation 

Secretary in the country. 

The challenges in continuing to provide a safe and free flowing transportation network have never been greater. Making matters worse, we recently learned that the 

Highway Trust Fund will run out of money sometime before August of this year, 

and will require an infusion of $5 billion to $7 billion to get through the rest of fiscal 

year 2009. An additional $8 billion to $10 billion will be required in 2010. 

Secretary Ridley has notified me that if we fail to fix the trust fund Oklahoma 

and most other States will not have the cash to honor infrastructure projects that 

have already been agreed to. As a result, my State will be forced to deprogram between $50 million and $80 million in projects. This will be done by canceling new 

projects and existing contracts that have already been signed, in addition to slowing 

down projects that have already broken ground. Clearly this would have a detrimental effect on the economy and will negate any gains made by the stimulus— 

which as I’ve said before, dramatically underinvested in infrastructure. 
6 

This truly complicates our efforts to reauthorize SAFETEA, which expires this October. Solving these challenges will require us all to work together. Unfortunately, 

there was a troubling development 2 weeks ago. This Administration hosted a conference call about the status of the Highway Trust Fund, sharing new, technical information about the inability of the Trust Fund to make required reimbursements 

to States. The White House set up the conference call and only invited Democratic 

staff to participate. This is completely unacceptable. 

The last Administration was widely criticized last August for not being more open 

and transparent with Congress and States over this very issue. I would have hoped 

this Administration would not repeat mistakes previously made and be open and 

transparent—especially with technical information. 

At confirmation hearings, I ask every nominee if they will share information with 

both sides of the aisle at the same time. I will ask you the same thing, but will 

add a very strong caution. I cannot support your nomination unless you commit to 

me that the minority will be treated equally in getting information and responses 

to questions from the FHWA. Will you make such a commitment to me now? 

Thank you. I look forward to your confirmation and working with you. 

Senator BOXER. Thank you, Senator. 

Senator Udall. 

Senator UDALL. I am going to pass so that we can get to the witness. Thank you very much, Madam Chair. 

Senator BOXER. Thank you. 

Senator Voinovich. 

OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. GEORGE V. VOINOVICH, 

U.S. SENATOR FROM THE STATE OF OHIO 

Senator VOINOVICH. Thank you, Madam Chairman, and Ranking 

Member Inhofe. 

I want to thank you, Mr. Mendez, for your being here today and 

your willingness to serve in this new capacity. And I thank your 

family for their past sacrifices and for the sacrifices that they will 

make in order to serve your Country. 

Having served as a mayor, Governor and now as a Senator, I understand the different needs, concerns and responsibilities that 

each level of government brings to bear on the challenges we face 

as communities and as a Nation. I am very pleased that you are 

familiar with the State and local perspective, having served as the 

Director of the Arizona Department of Transportation and then 

serving as President of AASHTO. 

I believe your experience with the FHWA at the State Department of Transportation level is going to serve you well in performing your job. I am very anxious to have you on board because 

I think that your experience is going to be valuable in helping us 

put together what I would like to consider as a new paradigm in 

terms of a transportation piece of legislation. 

I am also hopeful that you will have the courage to stand up and 

influence the Administration to understand that if we are going to 

do the job that we need to do in terms of our service transportation 

in this Country, we are going to have to have more money. And one 

of those sources of revenue has to be an increase in the gas tax. 

I know that does not go down very well with some folks, but the 

fact of the matter is almost everybody in this Country that cares, 

in fact, almost all of them that care, understand the realities of 

that situation. 

I am not going to go into details. You know what the needs are. 

If you take the Service Transportation Commission and the folks 

that came back about recommendations, we are talking about 
7 

$1.6 trillion over this 5-year period. We know that is not possible. 

But we are talking in the neighborhood of $450 billion to $500 billion in order to just get us where we are supposed to be. 

SAFETEA-LU, we fell behind. We knew it was not enough at the 

time. It was worse because of inflation, and now we are going to 

have to go back and find some more money if we are just going to 

fund it at the level that we funded in the past. 

So, I want you to know that I really look forward to working with 

you. I hope you are allowed to be engaged in this work that we are 

doing right now. I hope it is something very special. You have probably been looking at this for a long time. Now, you have got a 

chance to do something about it. So, I hope you take advantage of 

it. 

Thank you. 

[The prepared statement of Senator Voinovich follows:] 

STATEMENT OF HON. GEORGE V. VOINOVICH, U.S. SENATOR

FROM THE STATE OF OHIO

Madam Chairman and Ranking Member Inhofe, thank you for holding this nomination hearing. 

I would like to thank you, Mr. Mendez, for being here today, and for your willingness to serve. Even more importantly, I want to thank your family for their sacrifices. 

Having served as a mayor, Governor and now as Senator, I understand the different needs, concerns and responsibilities that each level of government brings to 

bear on the challenges we face as communities and as a Nation. I am very pleased 

that you are also familiar with the State and local perspective, having served as director of the Arizona Department of Transportation, and as president of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). I believe 

your experience working with FHWA at the State DOT level will serve you well. 

I am very anxious to have you on board because your experience will be valuable 

to provide the input we need to change our transportation policy. I think it is important for you to do two things as the next Administrator. First, you can provide input 

on how we should draft the next transportation reauthorization bill. And, second, 

I hope you can convince the Administration that without a gas tax increase, we cannot do what we need to do. 

As you certainly know, the Nation’s transportation needs greatly exceed current 

investment at all levels of government. DOT’s 2006 Conditions and Performance Report stated that the average annual investment level needed just to maintain the 

current condition and performance of our highway system is $78.8 billion, while the 

cost necessary to improve our highways and bridges would be $131.7 billion. 

More recently, the National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing 

Commission reported the Federal highway and transit funding gap totals nearly 

$400 billion in 2010 through 2015 and grows to about $2.3 trillion through 2035. 

Although SAFETEA-LU provided increased funding for the States and localities 

to improve the condition of deteriorating and unsafe highways and to increase capacity and performance, the system is still aging, and in need of additional investment. I predicted that the money spent from that authorization bill would not be 

enough. Sadly, I was right. Because of the rising costs of construction and energy, 

the purchasing power from SAFETEA-LU has significantly declined. This bill did 

not keep up with inflation, and as a result, we have fallen behind. According to 

DOT, the Highway Trust Fund will need an additional $5 billion to $7 billion to 

keep it solvent through the end of fiscal year 2009. 

I believe our failure to invest in the improvements necessary to keep pace with 

our growing population and increasing demands remains a significant obstacle to 

moving our economy forward. American businesses cannot compete globally, without 

strong infrastructure at home. 

These are daunting challenges facing FHWA, DOT, and this Committee as we 

move toward reauthorization. I look forward to hearing your thoughts on the next 

reauthorization bill, your suggestions for ensuring that enough funding is being invested in our highways and infrastructure, and your vision for FHWA’s role in ensuring that our Nation has the transportation infrastructure necessary to remain 

economically competitive for future generations. 
8 

Again, I think you for coming before this Committee today, and for your willingness to serve your country. 

Senator BOXER. Thank you so much. I love it when you get so 

enthusiastic. 

[Laughter.] 

Senator BOXER. It is good. It is good. 

Senator Klobuchar. 

OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. AMY KLOBUCHAR, 

U.S. SENATOR FROM THE STATE OF MINNESOTA 

Senator KLOBUCHAR. Thank you very much, Chairman Boxer. 

Congratulations, Mr. Mendez, for your nomination. We look forward to working with you. 

The role of your agency is very important in my State. It could 

not have been more clear than the day the bridge collapsed on August 1st, 2007, taking 13 people’s lives. I said that day that a 

bridge just should not fall down in the middle of America. Not an 

eight-lane highway and not one that is just six blocks from my 

house. 

So, I have spent a lot of time working with, I am sure you are 

familiar with Chairman Oberstar, who is also from Minnesota, 

working with him on the issues of bridge safety. We have a bill 

that I am sure parts of which we will try to incorporate in the upcoming SAFETEA-LU legislation. But this is about making sure 

that the money spent on bridge maintenance is truly spent on 

bridge maintenance and, in fact, is not spent on building new 

projects that are good for ribbon cuttings but then allow our other 

infrastructure to deteriorate in this Country. 

According to the Federal Highway Administration, which we 

hope you will soon head up, more than 25 percent of the Nation’s 

600,000 bridges are either structurally deficient or functionally obsolete. We have many challenges here, not only for safety, but also, 

of course, for economic development. We got a good start with the 

Recovery Act. Also, there is the congestion that we have in so many 

of our areas where workers remain idle in traffic. Americans spend 

4.2 billion hours a year stuck in traffic at a cost to the economy 

of $78.2 billion or $710 for each motorist. 

So to me this involves not just better roads and bridges, but also 

a mix of transportation options. I have been very surprised, pleasantly surprised, at the support for rail in our State in areas of the 

State that did not traditionally support it. It just took the Vice 

President out to St. Cloud, Minnesota where we are building the 

North Star Rail very close to St. Cloud. That is something that we 

care a lot about. 

And, of course, when it comes to highways, the right use of these 

roads, including smart ideas of how to control traffic better. We 

have been working with IBM, which has a substantial project in 

Minnesota, on some of the technology that they want to develop to 

have intelligence transportation solutions. So it is going to be a mix 

of special lanes for bikes, pedestrians, and also better roads and 

bridges. 

We are very much looking forward to working with you. Thank 

you for appearing here today. 

Senator BOXER. Thank you, Senator. 
9 

We will go to Senator Bond. 

OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, 

U.S. SENATOR FROM THE STATE OF MISSOURI 

Senator BOND. Thank you very much, Madam Chair, and Senator Inhofe. 

It is a pleasure to welcome Mr. Mendez and to join with the hallelujah and amen chorus in applauding your nomination, recognizing the great contributions you have made, not only in your 

State, but in your service in the national organization. 

As a former Governor, as we have discussed, I understand full 

well the challenges you had to face, and having someone in your 

position, who has gone through that, is extremely important. And 

I believe you also have worked closely with our director in Missouri, Pete Rahn. We had a good opportunity to talk about that. 

These are tough times. You have got a really tough battle ahead. 

You face an insolvent Highway Trust Fund that will need more 

than a Band-Aid to fix, rising construction costs, and a transportation system that literally is bursting at the seams. 

It is going to require long-term vision, vision for surface transportation with all of the other components we have discussed which 

go into that transportation system. It is quality infrastructure, in 

my view, and I believe you share that. It connects people and communities with one another, it attracts and sustains jobs and a high 

quality of life. I do not think there is anything more important the 

Government can be doing in this Country and certainly, in Missouri and across the Country, there is a growing concern about the 

real strains coming up in transportation. 

Vehicle miles traveled remain at historic highs, congestion rates 

are up with more and more people sitting in traffic, extra trucks 

carrying products to and from businesses around the globe, construction. Construction is a real problem. It is not only frustrating, 

but it takes a real toll on our economy and our productivity. 

We have to work together on the authorization bill to make sure 

that essential infrastructure investments provide a good return to 

taxpayers. You and I have spoken about some of the additional alternatives, ideas that have come up for dedicated commercial lanes 

for truck traffic and how to fund them. 

And another area where I know you share concern is on project 

delivery times. As we speak the costs of transportation projects 

around the Country are increasing while contractors, municipalities and State DOTs wade through the mess of bureaucracy that 

is our current project development process. We cannot afford to 

continue on the path where it takes 10 to 15 years to deliver highway projects. It does not take a mathematician to figure out that 

such as impediment means project costs tripling, congested highways, increased productivity and compromised road safety. 

We thought we had made some progress on the streamlining in 

the SAFETEA bill on which we worked very hard with the help of 

your department. But, obviously, we have got to do more. We have 

got to deliver these projects, make sure we touch all the bases, but 

do it in an efficient manner. 

Then there is a real problem, and I have another hearing as most 

people do today, that I would ask you to address. What are we 
10 

going to do about the $8.7 billion rescission? We are talking about 

spending big money on shovel ready projects. This $8.7 billion rescission that we had to put in SAFETEA is going to unstimulate, 

unstimulate, projects that are shovel ready, ready to go. And right 

now the prospect of shutting them down means that we are not 

doing the work of preparing to put people to work on highways 

where they could be doing something. 

I think it was a big mistake. I am very sorry that the Stimulus 

Bill, which I think got off track, only put 4 percent into transportation and did not even deal with the rescission. Now, of all the 

things that we ought to do, we ought to do something to stop Government action that will unstimulate the economy. I look forward 

to hearing any thoughts you have on that. 

I would say, also, I noticed that as Deputy Director of ADOT you 

oversaw one of Arizona’s first design-build projects. It seems to be 

working in Missouri. I hope you will be an advocate for that, that 

can reduce some of the burdens of long project delivery time at the 

Federal level as well, and we look forward to reading your testimony. 

I congratulate you on your nomination and, most of all, as my 

colleagues have said, we look forward to working with you on this 

very challenging and important job you have. 

Thank you. 

Senator BOXER. Thank you, Senators, all. 

I just wanted to say, Mr. Mendez, given all of the problems that 

we have thrown at you, we hope that you will still want this job. 

We obviously all agree that you are an excellent choice. 

So it is your time now. Speak to us. If you have any family members here, or friends, please feel free to introduce them, and then 

once you get started with your statement we will start the clock. 

STATEMENT OF VICTOR M. MENDEZ, NOMINATED TO BE ADMINISTRATOR, FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, U.S. 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Mr. MENDEZ. Thank you, Chairman Boxer. I do appreciate the 

magnitude of the job here. 

I will not be introducing anyone. I think it is just time to get 

down to business and, as you have all articulated very well, we 

have a lot of challenges. So I will begin with my statement right 

now. 

Good morning, Chairman Boxer, Ranking Member Inhofe, and 

Members of the Committee. I appreciate the opportunity to be here 

today as you consider my nomination for Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 

I would like to extend my sincere thanks to Senator Kyl for that 

very kind introduction. I really appreciate that from him. 

It is an honor and privilege to have been recommended by Secretary LaHood and nominated by President Obama for this very 

important position. I appreciate the significant role this Committee 

plays in establishing transportation policy and, if confirmed, I look 

forward to working closely with all of you to improve the delivery 

of the Federal-aid highway program. 

As the former director of the Arizona Department of Transportation and former president of the American Association of State 
11 

and Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO), I am very well 

aware of the many responsibilities and challenges that lie ahead 

for the next Federal Highway Administrator. In the immediate future, we near the expiration of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), 

coupled with the impending cash shortfall in the Highway Trust 

Fund. Then, in the long term, we must identify sustainable funding 

mechanisms to address our aging infrastructure and congested 

roads, all in the face of a struggling economy. 

Our highways must be made safer. Our transportation system 

must be equipped to meet the growing demands of freight movement if we are to compete in a global economy and stimulate economic growth in the Nation. 

We must also consider multimodal solutions to reduce the transportation sector’s greenhouse gas emissions. I share Secretary 

LaHood’s commitment to safety as the highest priority at the Department. Although fatalities and injuries on our roads are declining, too many people still die or are injured in highway crashes 

each year. If confirmed, I will work with the Administration, Congress, the States, transportation safety advocates and the public to 

continue the downward trend in highway fatalities and injuries. 

I will also focus on the successful deployment of highway dollars 

under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Recovery 

Act). Like the President and the Secretary, I strongly believe that, 

through the efficient implementation of Recovery Act projects, 

FHWA plays a key role in creating jobs, putting people back to 

work, and keeping families from foreclosure. 

Another priority, if I am confirmed as the Administrator, will be 

to develop a robust transportation reauthorization solution in partnership with Congress, the Administration, Secretary LaHood, and 

the various transportation stakeholders. Too often, we think about 

economic competition among cities and regions within the United 

States. However, in the next reauthorization of surface transportation programs, we must not forget that America must compete 

with nations such as China and India. 

We must keep both rural and urban America moving and economically competitive in the 21st century. We must meet the needs 

of the American public and business community to ensure safety, 

a better quality of life and a vibrant economy. We must support environmental stewardship, blend public and private sector collaboration, and ensure accountability and transparency of public expenditures in transportation. 

I will work closely with Secretary LaHood and other officials to 

consider coordinated strategies and multimodal solutions to address our transportation challenges. 

If confirmed, I will also encourage the use of innovation, research 

and technology to solve our transportation problems. We need to 

identify and develop innovative environmental, congestion and finance solutions, and share best practices in the delivery of projects 

and in other areas of importance to transportation stakeholders. 

I am mindful of the challenges that face the next Administrator. 

With my background in civil engineering and a transportation career spanning over 25 years, including at the Arizona Department 

of Transportation for seven and one-half years, I bring the experi-
12 

ence, knowledge, management and leadership skills to bring 

FHWA through the challenges that lie ahead. The employees at 

FHWA possess an incredible wealth of knowledge and expertise, 

and I look forward to the opportunity to work with them as well 

to find solutions. 

I am committed to working with you, the Administration, Secretary LaHood, and all transportation stakeholders as we look for 

ways to meet our Nation’s transportation needs. 

Madam Chairman, thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today and for your consideration. I would be happy to answer your questions. 

Thank you very much. 

[The prepared statement of Mr. Mendez follows:] 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
29 
30 
31 
32 
33 
34 
35 
36 
37 

Senator BOXER. Thank you so much. 

I will start, and each of us will have 5 minutes and as long as 

people want to stay. 

I have to say that at 10 minutes of the hour, I have to go to the 

floor to speak in favor of Gina McCarthy, who is up for a very important post at the EPA, so if Senator Lautenberg is not here, Senator Udall, would you take the gavel? Oh, thank you. 

The Obama administration told us that the Highway Trust Fund 

will run out of cash before August. You were Director of the Arizona DOT when this same situation developed last fall. What were 

the impacts on your program? And, based on that experience, how 

will you manage the Federal payments? 

Mr. MENDEZ. Madam Chairman, I think it is important that you 

do frame it in terms of drawing from my experience in Arizona. 

Clearly, one of the issues that we faced last year as we became 

aware of the pending shortfall, at the time, was the fact that we 

were notified at pretty much the last minute. So one of the things 

that I know the Administration is currently undertaking is advance 

notification of the situation. 

As you are aware, and it has been mentioned here before, a lot 

of that communication has already started with you and members 

of your Committee. I think it is important to keep that in mind. 

Early notification is, indeed, very important. 

With that said, I think that provides the States the opportunity 

to prepare themselves in case there is not a solution to the shortfall 

that is expected here in the summer, which I understand is sometime in August. I believe somebody here mentioned that we are anticipating a shortfall somewhere between $5 billion to $7 billion 

coming in August, and that would be one of my highest priorities 

if I am confirmed, and I would work with you very closely to ensure 

that we find a solution for this along with the Administration. 

Senator BOXER. Good. Could I just ask you now, will you do everything in your power to keep us all informed, Democrats and Republicans on this Committee, as to the deliberations? I think Senator Inhofe was concerned that he was not called by the Administration. So, will you be our liaison on those issues? 

Mr. MENDEZ. Madam Chairman, absolutely. 

Senator BOXER. Excellent. 

And my last question. Your predecessor, in both Arizona and as 

FHWA Administrator, Mary Peters, who I like very much, clearly 

supported devolution of most, if not all, Federal highway programs 

back to the States. On that, I did not agree with her. And I am 

happy to report that the big four over here already have had our 

meetings and we, across party lines, believe a Federal role must be 

continued. I would like to ask you, because she was pushing for 

devolution, do you think that a strong Federal role is needed to assure that our highway system is in good condition and serves the 

entire Nation? 

Mr. MENDEZ. Madam Chairman, it is a very interesting question 

that you raise. From my perspective, and again I have not had the 

opportunity to have detailed discussions on principles with the Secretary being in this nomination situation, but I clearly believe that 

there is a need for national strategies and a national program to 

ensure that we, as a Nation, address national and regional issues. 
38 

In many cases, as you are aware, States may look at their own 

needs, but there are times when you have multi-State and regional 

issues that should be coordinated, probably on a national policy 

level. So, I believe there certainly is a role for the Federal Government in establishing the long-term future for transportation and it 

needs to be coordinated through some national oversight, and a national policy that address future needs. 

Senator BOXER. Well, I think that what you have said really underscores what came about in the 1950s by President Eisenhower 

when he envisioned this kind of a role. I do have two quick, three 

quick questions, just a matter of, we have to do this to make sure 

that you get confirmed. So, I will ask each one and then ask you 

to say yes or no. 

Do you agree, if confirmed as Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration, to appear before this Committee, or designated Members of this Committee and other appropriate committees of Congress, and provide information subject to appropriate 

and necessary security protection with respect to your responsibilities as the Administrator? 

Mr. MENDEZ. Yes. 

Senator BOXER. Do you agree to ensure that testimony, briefings, 

documents, and electronic and other forms of communication of information are provided to this Committee and its staff and other 

appropriate committees in a timely manner? 

Mr. MENDEZ. Yes. 

Senator BOXER. And last, do you know of any matters which you 

may or may not have disclosed that might place you in any conflict 

of interest if you are confirmed as Administrator? 

Mr. MENDEZ. No. 

Senator BOXER. Excellent. 

So, what I am going to do is hand the gavel over to Senator Lautenberg, who has agreed to take over. I will call on Senator 

Voinovich and then, Senator Lautenberg, if you would continue this 

hearing and complete it, that would be great. I have to go speak 

on the floor about our nominee, Gina McCarthy. 

Thank you, Senator Lautenberg. 

Senator Voinovich. 

Senator VOINOVICH. Thank you, Madam Chairman. Mr. Mendez, every year, an estimated $417 billion of freight 

crosses the Brent Spence Bridge across the Ohio River in Cincinnati. That is between Cincinnati and Kentucky. That is roughly 

equivalent to 3 percent of the United States Gross Domestic Product in 2008. The amount of freight traffic is expected to increase 

to $830 billion by 2030. 

This bridge has five times more accidents than the average highway in the State of Ohio. The bridge is the biggest choke point in 

the Country in terms of the interstate system. It contributes probably in the top five in terms of degradation of our air. In fact, EPA 

is doing a study in the vicinity there, we have housing, on the impact diesel emissions are having on children’s health. 

It is important to the infrastructure of the American economy. 

The cost at this stage of the game is nearly $3 billion, which is 

more than the total appropriation for both Ohio and Kentucky on 

an annual basis. 
39 

I would like to know what your position is in terms of creating 

a separate funding stream for projects with national significance, 

such as the Brent Spence Bridge. This is one the things that the 

Committee is considering in terms of the next highway bill, of looking out around the Country and looking at rankings, for example, 

big congestion problem too, of course, with this. What is your 

thought about that approach? 

Mr. MENDEZ. Senator, I am not specifically familiar with the location that you mentioned to me. But I think it is very important 

on a broad basis to comment on—— 

Senator VOINOVICH. It is the second most used bridge in the 

interstate system in the Country. 

Mr. MENDEZ. OK. In terms of some of these major, as I mentioned earlier, regional and national projects, it is important for us, 

on a national basis, to establish some level of policy that may address some of these issues now. I also need to be able to work with 

the Secretary to ensure that we are all on the same page. At this 

point in time, I have not had the opportunity to talk about some 

of the principles and some of the specific elements you mention 

here. 

Senator VOINOVICH. Well, the fact of the matter is that you have 

done the job in Arizona. You have been the President of ASSHTO. 

You have got to have had a $35,000 look at this and, overall, what 

is your thought about the fact that we should do these kinds of 

projects that are really impacting negatively on our commerce, environment and the rest of it? 

Mr. MENDEZ. Right. Senator, one of the discussions that I have 

had recently is about some of the literature where we have a map 

that shows the major congested arteries throughout the United 

States. I think that is the kind of information that we need collectively in Congress, with the Administration, to begin to look at as 

we consider issues that are going to be very important within reauthorization and sit down and develop national strategies to address 

situations such as what you just described. It may be part of that 

artery map that all of us have been looking at. 

But beyond that, I think that it is important for us to work collectively and try and bring all of these issues to the table and try 

and come up with national strategies or policies to address some 

of the issues such as you described. 

Senator VOINOVICH. And there is the issue of how long it takes 

to build a bridge. We have another bridge over on I–90 over the 

Cuyahoga River. It was started out at $500 million. Now it is $1.6 

billion with all of the red tape that one has to go through in order 

to go forward with a project. Again, it is just impossible. 

I work very, very hard. In fact, I was pleased that AASHTO honored me several years ago for what we did with 4(f). It is really interesting that we revised the 4(f) process and, to this date, the Department of Transportation has not finalized the regulations for 

this. It appears to me that there is not anybody over there that is 

really staying on top of trying to speed these, you know, move this 

along. Thirteen years the National Commission said it takes on 

these major issues. 

What are you going to do about that? 
40 

Mr. MENDEZ. Mr. Senator, I understand the situation. I am very 

well aware that the project delivery process does take a long time. 

Similar to what Senator Gillibrand mentioned earlier, there have 

been some innovations that were implemented where there have 

been crises, where we have been very innovative and very creative 

in executing project delivery. 

If I am confirmed, I would be very happy to work with all of you 

on some of these solutions. I can tell you that is an issue. We have 

worked with many stakeholders and tried to streamline the entire 

project delivery system, not with respect to just environmental 

issues, not just the bridge issues, but the overall project delivery 

process. Thirteen years is, in fact, way too long. 

Senator VOINOVICH. Can we get a commitment from you that you 

are going to get the regulations done on 4(f) that we got done in 

the last highway bill, pronto? 

Mr. MENDEZ. Mr. Senator, I will look into that and I will do 

whatever I can within my power to execute that. 

Senator VOINOVICH. Thank you. 

Senator LAUTENBERG [presiding]. Thank you. 

Next we will hear from Senator Udall. 

Senator UDALL. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. 

Congratulations, Mr. Mendez, on your nomination and thank you 

for your courtesy visit to my office last week or several weeks ago. 

I wanted to ask you about a couple of issues. First is the issue 

of railroad crossing safety, which I am sure you have dealt with as 

the highest highway official in the State of Arizona. New Mexico 

has almost 1,700 rail crossings, yet receives just $1.5 million in 

Section 130 highway funding under FHWA for rail safety. This 

level of funding only allows the State to upgrade maybe five to 

seven crossings per year. As you are probably aware, AASHTO supports increasing funding for the Section 130 Grade Crossing Program, which has ended up saving thousands of lives since its inception in the 1970s. 

The first question: do you agree that Section 130 should be funded at current or higher levels? How will work to implement rail 

safety programs to prevent rail crossing accidents? And will you 

work to introduce new technologies to improve rail safety, especially for tracks that cross roads and pass through populate areas? 

Mr. MENDEZ. Thank you, Senator. If I might, please, I would like 

to correct myself. I did not mean to say—— 

Senator UDALL. Senator Klobuchar. 

Mr. MENDEZ. I am sorry for that mistake. 

Senator UDALL. We all recognize Senator Klobuchar. You would 

not be able to mislead us. We know her, we know her laugh. Do 

not worry. 

Mr. MENDEZ. My apologies, Senator. 

Let me address the Section 130 issue. Again, drawing from my 

experience in Arizona, throughout the Nation, that is an issue. I 

can tell you the Administration, Secretary LaHood, as well as a lot 

of us, I do, in fact, as I mentioned in my earlier comments, place 

transportation safety as our highest priority. So, if confirmed, I 

really do look forward to working with you as we develop these reauthorization scenarios, strategies and principles to address specifi-
41 

cally those needs and see what we can do to actually resolve some 

of those issues. 

Senator UDALL. One of the other issues is the issue of green 

highways or new technology. I am very interested in ways that 

roads can be made more green through the use of recycled construction materials, methods to reduce runoff and other innovations. And I hope that you will work diligently to push the envelope 

on innovation. 

As the Arizona Highway official and also on AASHTO, I am sure 

you are very familiar with Indian reservation roads. The Indian 

Reservation Roads Program is important for addressing the transportation challenges facing tribes in my State and across the Nation. 

The Stimulus Package made available $310 million specifically 

for the Indian Reservation Roads Program. However, tribes in New 

Mexico are actually seeing a decline in their annual funding under 

this program, apparently do to how the Federal Highway Administration includes a vast number of county, State and even interstate 

roads in the inventory of roads supported by the Indian Reservation Roads Program. 

Congress intended this program to be primarily for tribes, rather 

than for roads that have other sources of funding. I am sure you 

are aware of this situation in Arizona because you also share the 

Navajo Reservation with New Mexico and Utah. Do you have any 

recommendations on how we can restore the program to its original 

purposes? 

Mr. MENDEZ. Mr. Senator, as you just mentioned, being from Arizona, we clearly have a lot of coordination functions with the Native American tribes there in Arizona. So I am familiar with the 

issues. 

I do understand the scenario that, on a national basis, the Indian 

tribes do lack in terms of resources. I would be very happy to work 

with you on those same issues to ensure that priorities are established properly so that we can get the maximum return out of 

those investments on the Indian tribes and the tribal reservations. 

Senator UDALL. Thank you, Mr. Mendez, and I will submit additional questions for the record and we look forward to your speedy 

approval and you assuming your position. Thank you very much. 

Mr. MENDEZ. Thank you. 

Senator LAUTENBERG. Senator Klobuchar. 

Senator KLOBUCHAR. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. 

Mr. Mendez, I am going to be soon introducing legislation called 

Dig Once with Senator Warner and others and it will incorporate 

road construction projects with the deployment of broadband infrastructure on Federal projects. Road construction season in Minnesota is short because of our weather and the multiple diggings 

are a big hassle and cost a lot of money for taxpayers. 

So we are trying to encourage, as much as we can, a joint deployment of these. Have you had any familiarity with this in Arizona? 

Or are you willing to work with us to develop a policy on this? 

Mr. MENDEZ. Senator, thank you for the question. As I mentioned earlier in my comments, I am an advocate for research, technology and innovation. I believe the idea that you raise in terms 

of what can we do to implement broadband, for example, that is a 
42 

great idea. I like that. So, I am more than happy to work with you 

on these innovative solutions. There are a lot of great ideas out 

there and I would be more than happy to work with you on that. 

Senator KLOBUCHAR. I talked, in my opening comments, about 

the bridge maintenance and the Bridge Maintenance Fund. I do not 

know if you are familiar with this issue and the bill that I had with 

Senator Boxer and Senator Durbin, as well as Congressman Oberstar was sponsoring in the House, focusing on requiring States to 

use their bridge maintenance money for bridge maintenance instead of other things. 

I know the States want some flexibility when it comes to these 

funds, but it turned out some of them were being used for projects 

completely unrelated to bridge maintenance. I wonder if you had, 

again, any familiarity in your past job or any view on this? 

Mr. MENDEZ. Yes, Senator, clearly, probably every State faces 

the same situation. As you are aware, as State officials, we have 

advocated for that flexibility. At the same time, I would say to you, 

once we settle in on solutions with Congress and the Administration, we absolutely do intend to follow the letter of the law. I would 

like to add to that that safety, whether it is bridge safety or just 

roadway safety, is of highest priority to all of us. 

Senator KLOBUCHAR. Given your experience as a State transportation leader, do you have any just general ideas about how to improve the areas where the Highway Administration can improve on 

the Federal level? 

Mr. MENDEZ. Senator, as I mentioned in my opening comments, 

I do have some priorities that I want to pursue very quickly, including implementation of the economic recovery projects and such 

and, of course, reauthorization. But when I talk about innovation, 

research and technology, those are the arenas where I believe we 

can really drill into looking at different ways of conducting business, not just in terms of the technical elements of building highways, but also about innovations in terms of using technology, for 

example, to make a road safer and monitor bridges from a safety 

perspective, that kind of thing. So, that is sort of what I am looking 

for when I am talking about innovation. 

We have a lot of great ideas, a lot of great people in the industry 

and we should find some kind of a venue to really be able to flesh 

out, sit down and share those ideas and maybe even build on those 

ideas. 

Senator KLOBUCHAR. How about public-private partnerships? 

You know we have talked about that as part of the solution to our 

transportation problems. There are a number of bills out there focusing on that or some kind of a fund or bonding. There are some 

bonding requirements or allowances in the Recovery Act, but can 

you talk about that? I know we will have a debate on how to fund 

this. We took money already from the General Fund, $8 billion, 

and may have to use that route again to try to fund this. Have you 

looked at this idea of public-private partnerships? 

Mr. MENDEZ. Senator, yes, indeed. It has been an issue that has 

been out there for several years now. I think the important thing, 

of course, is on a broader basis. We are looking for innovative ideas 

in terms of funding and financing. I believe public-private partnerships (P3s) do play an important role. 
43 

However, I do want to caution that, in my mind, public-private 

partnerships are not the silver bullet. It just seems to be that when 

we, collectively, as transportation and industry stakeholders come 

up with a final solution on transportation, that we are going to be 

looking at a compendium or a compilation of various sources of 

funding. I believe P3s play a very important role in that. 

Senator KLOBUCHAR. Have you looked at that vehicles miles 

travel experiment that they did in Oregon as a way of funding 

things and do you think that has much promise? I know there is 

concern in rural areas about that. 

Mr. MENDEZ. Yes, Senator, being a former State Director, as that 

experiment was underway we watched and tracked it very closely 

through various discussions and dialogs at various conferences 

through AASHTO. We looked at that. It is an interesting and innovative approach. I believe as we begin to look at some of these solutions, the Secretary has been very clear that he wants to put all 

the ideas on the table. So, I am assuming that is what will happen. 

Senator KLOBUCHAR. All right. Thank you very much. 

Senator LAUTENBERG. Thank you. 

Senator Merkley. 

Senator MERKLEY. Thank you very much, Mr. Chair, and it is a 

pleasure to have you here today, Mr. Mendez. 

I wanted to start by just asking you to share your thoughts. I 

know that you are well aware that transportation emissions are 

one of the biggest contributors to global warming and a significant 

factor in our dependence on foreign oil. What are your thoughts on 

how this can be addressed in the process of planning and building 

transportation systems, specifically at the Federal Highway Administration? 

Mr. MENDEZ. Thank you, Senator. Let me begin by looking at the 

bigger picture. We look at the literature on greenhouse gas emissions and, depending on what you read, somewhere between 28 to 

33 percent of greenhouse gases are attributed to the transportation 

sector. With that in mind, it is important for us to look at those 

issues and see how transportation, specifically, can address that. 

Now, it is my understanding that within the Department there 

already is an internal working group looking at ways to adapt for 

some of these issues in terms of global warming and greenhouse 

gas emissions. It is my understanding that, under the President, 

there is an interagency working group underway that includes 13 

agencies, including housing, to look at some of the broader policies 

beyond transportation because transportation needs to be integrated and coordinated, for example, with other housing policies 

and local land use policies. 

Then we look at, really, some of the issues specific to transportation. I believe there are four strategies that we traditionally consider and one of the strategies is that you need to begin to look at 

is to reduce vehicle miles traveled. We know that would be a major 

benefit. There are other strategies that involve the transportation 

sector. For example, low carbon fuels and improving vehicle technologies. So, there are a lot of strategies that are specific to the sector that need to be looked at. 
44 

But it is not necessarily just a United States DOT effort. So, if 

I am confirmed, I would be more than happy to work with you on 

some of these ideas and some of your thoughts on this. 

Senator MERKLEY. Thank you. I look forward to that. 

One of the ideas that have pursued in Oregon is we have dedicated 1 percent of our State Highway Funds to bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, which is kind of a win-win because it keeps 

more cars off the roads and reduces congestion, reduces global 

warming gases, and increases health from the exercise component. 

Do you see any sort of a parallel with what could be done at the 

Federal Highway Administration? 

Mr. MENDEZ. Senator, I believe, as we have listened very carefully to the President and the Secretary, multimodal options have 

been very important in terms of potential principles that will be 

laid out, livability concepts have been discussed very clearly, and 

I believe all of that fits very well with what you have just described. So, it is something that we need to continue to work on. 

Senator MERKLEY. Let me throw out another idea from Oregon. 

We have the Nation’s first solar highway, which is utilizing a 

stretch of right-of-way to produce energy and feed it directly into 

the grid. The crude estimate is that, using about 2 percent of the 

rights-of-way, the surplus rights-of-way on the shoulders, would 

easily meet all of the lighting demands of the highway system, and 

everything beyond that could be fed back in to provide renewable 

energy elsewhere. Large stretches of right-of-way with good access, 

in general, to transmission lines. Is that a concept that you have 

thought about or are interested in taking a further look at? 

Mr. MENDEZ. Mr. Senator, when I met with you, I believe the following day you were going to go visit that solar highway. 

Senator MERKLEY. I was and I have been there and I was very 

impressed. 

Mr. MENDEZ. OK, so I got the answer. I have not visited that 

highway. In fact, when Oregon DOT undertook that, I thought, 

wow, they beat me to the punch. Being from Arizona, which is 

sunny most of the time, I thought that should have been our initiative. But again, that is one of the types of ideas, the innovations 

that we need to be pursuing in transportation, to do exactly what 

may become a standard practice 20 years from now. And we will 

look back and say, look everybody is now doing it nationwide. 

Senator MERKLEY. Thank you. One more piece of infrastructure 

I am interested in is ways we can support electric vehicles. Do you 

have any thoughts about how that might be incorporated into the 

highway system? 

Mr. MENDEZ. Mr. Senator, I think, again, that is one of the 

issues that we need to really sit down, discuss in earnest and look 

at all the options. I have not personally taken the time to look at 

the elements that are important to make something like that happen. But clearly, under an innovations initiative, I would more 

than happy to sit down and work through those issues. 

Senator MERKLEY. Terrific. I really look forward to working with 

you. Thank you. 

Senator LAUTENBERG. Thank you very much, Mr. Mendez. Welcome. 
45 

You bring a distinguished background to this opportunity and we 

are pleased and, very frankly excited about, the fact that you stand 

a very good chance of being confirmed and that you have an even 

better chance to make a huge difference in the way our Country 

travels. 

No matter where you go, there is too much traffic for the roads, 

delays. It does not matter what part of the Country you are in, almost what part of the world you are in. And the fact that you, in 

a major project in Arizona, were able to meet the target deadline 

by a substantial period of time, that kind of a record will earn you 

lots of friendships here and across the Country. 

When we look at the problems with congestion, it is not only not 

getting there on time, wherever there is, but it is the accompanying 

problems with environmental pollution that is just overwhelming 

us. And the imported oil problem is an enormous problem for 

Americans. The transfer of wealth is going the wrong way. We 

have got lots of problems, including the deficient and deteriorated 

bridges and infrastructure that we have. 

So, we are pleased about the change that is facing us with you 

coming with your experience and your record. And I want to work 

with you to address all kinds of things, particularly safety problems 

that threaten our families, such as the presence of large trucks on 

our roads. 

There is no question that trucks play a critical role in getting 

products that we rely upon from our ports and factories to our 

stores. But we have seen it in New Jersey. Trucks that are too 

heavy and too long pose a threat to our roads and bridges and the 

drivers and passengers that use them. Now, these large trucks 

weigh more than 80,000 pounds and can lead to bridge fatigue 

damage. And these trucks are responsible for a disproportionate 

share of highway deaths when compared to cars or small trucks. 

Despite their proven safety problems, proponents of bigger trucks 

have tried to weaken Federal highway laws to make trucks even 

heavier and bigger. My view is that adding bigger trucks to our 

roads is a recipe for disaster. I was able to write legislation some 

years ago to keep them only in the places that they were grandfathered and, this past April, I introduced a bill to protect our infrastructure and improve safety by helping to keep dangerously 

large trucks off our roads. If confirmed, I look forward to working 

with you, Mr. Mendez, to accomplish these and other goals. 

By way of information, the Committee has received letters from 

the following organizations in support your nomination: AAA, 

American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials, American Counsel of Engineering Companies. I seek unanimous consent to insert these letters into the hearing record in my 

full statement and that record as well. 

[The referenced material follows:] 
46 
47 
48 
49 

Senator LAUTENBERG. Yesterday, in New Jersey, we announced 

the availability of substantially increased rail service. Now, the corridor, it is not just the northeast corridor, it is the corridor that 

goes from New Jersey to New York, where hundreds of thousands 

of people make the crossing every day. We are working now on the 

development of a rail tunnel across the Hudson River and extending the availability of service there. When the tunnel is complete, 

we are going to be looking at 22,000 fewer cars on the highway. 

So we are excited about that. We are looking at reductions in toxic 

pollution. And that is a very promising thing. 

But we have had another experience in New Jersey. We have 

been building rail spurs. In each case, like the one that we did yesterday, when it first opens, people were not, I would not say skeptical, but unrelated change happens. 

The first year, the average ridership in the Secaucus Junction 

Station was 5,000 people. Now it is 17,000 people and we have just 

extended more rail service from there. From our capitol, Trenton, 

down to Camden, New Jersey, which is one of the biggest cities in 

the southern part of our State, when the rail line first opened up, 

it was modest ridership. 

But something else happened. Businesses saw the convenience 

that employees might have getting back and forth to work on public transportation. Now, companies are opening along the line. It is 

a real spur to the economic situation which we desperately need to 

fix. 

While you are looking at Federal highways, the one thing I know 

that your experience is broad enough to say, that you have got to 

look at other things as well. Whatever the influence, it is a question of whether that kind of process is acceptable, because it means 

dividing the revenues that are available to us. And also to try and 

somehow figure out the consequences of things that we are doing. 

It is so interesting. 

Senator Moynihan was one of our great advocates of public transportation. He always used to point out that the National Highway 

System developed by President Eisenhower had an odd effect and 

result, and that was that it gave people an opportunity to abandon 

the cities and go find other places to live and move away from the 

problems of urban existence. 

Well, as a consequence, what we have seen across our State and, 

frankly, across this Country, is the decay, in many cases, of the cities, the urban centers, because people did not want to wrestle with 

the problems. But the problems are there for us, whether we 

choose to have them or not. So, we have to be very select in the 

things that we do. 

Earlier this year, Secretary LaHood said that in order to meet 

our future transportation demands, we cannot simply add lanes to 

our highways or invest our transportation dollars as we have in the 

past. Do you agree with that view? 

Mr. MENDEZ. Mr. Senator, you articulated, in all your comments, 

what I would consider to be the coordination of a full transportation system. Of course, you need to move commerce, heavy commerce, trucks, et cetera, and there are challenges with that. But at 

the same time, you also need to move people safely. There are also 

the intramodal aspects of pretty much everything that you talked 
50 

about there. So, I think it is important as we move forward and 

begin looking at our solutions for the future, that we in earnest 

take a look at all the issues, just as you have articulated. 

The solutions that I have heard from Secretary LaHood have 

been looking at multi-modal solutions, because I think we all recognize that our world has changed in the last 20 years, the last 10 

years for that fact. So our behaviors have changed. The price of 

fuel, for example, last year seemed to really create a spike in public 

transportation usage. So, I think as we being to look at the future 

proactively, it is important for all of us to take a good, hard look 

at that and assess the true needs. 

My feeling on this is that we have to be looking at all the options 

that are out there to ensure the viability of, not just our economic 

system, but also to ensure that all of our citizens are able to go 

from Point A to Point B in a safe and efficient manner. 

Senator LAUTENBERG. I recently introduced legislation that 

would establish a national transportation policy, a national transportation surface policy. Do you think we need that kind of a plan 

that places performance based measures on our Federal transportation programs? And let us see what happens as we do these 

things, to be sure that we focus on whether or not these investments are worthwhile and should be continued? 

Mr. MENDEZ. Yes. Mr. Senator, everybody is more actively engaged and informed about Government and what we do in Government. It is very clear to me that both President Obama and Secretary LaHood want to ensure transparency in the way we expend 

public funds. 

With that, I think, it is going to be very imperative for all of us 

in the transportation industry to, first of all, show accountability 

for those dollars, and second of all, to ensure that our performance 

is up to snuff. We need to ensure that, with limited resources, we 

place those resources where they are absolutely necessary and that 

they go to the highest priority infrastructure needs, and we need 

to ensure the public that we are doing the best we can with those 

funds. 

Senator LAUTENBERG. You know, the pity of it is, we have neglected putting money into the transportation systems in our Country that are so much in demand. As a consequence, we now face 

a crisis situation. No one is anxious to increase taxes or costs for 

operating, but reality is there and as a consequence, we have got 

to accept the fact that there are different ways to move people and 

goods. We have got to work on it. 

Over the past decade, the number of people killed in crashes 

with large trucks has averaged 5,000 each year. Further, large 

trucks place a major strain on our already stressed infrastructure. 

There is currently a ban on large trucks that weigh more than 

80,000 pounds and are longer than 53 feet on our interstate highway system. Could you imagine what the consequences of relaxing 

that ban would be? Would you think it would have a serious negative effect? 

Mr. MENDEZ. Mr. Senator, over the past decade or so, I have 

been engaged in that discussion. Being in Arizona, that issue was 

often raised. I think we look at, well, what is really the balance 

here? Clearly, under the current situation, safety is one of the fac-
51 

tors that needs to be balanced out, along with productivity and, as 

you mentioned earlier, preserving our infrastructure. So, if I am 

confirmed, and if you as a Congress and the Administration choose 

to delve into that issue and look at different balances due to 

changes in the environment, I would be more than happy to do 

that. 

Senator LAUTENBERG. I am going to now call on Senator Carper, 

who will Chair the Committee. Thank you very much for being 

available to us and for the kind of work we expect you to be doing. 

Mr. MENDEZ. Thank you. 

Senator CARPER [presiding]. Mr. Mendez, welcome. Thank you 

for joining us and for your willingness to serve. We have a vote underway, so this will last about five more minutes and then you will 

be free at last. 

Mr. MENDEZ. Thanks. 

Senator CARPER. I want to ask you to just share briefly with us 

your take on a couple of programs, one of which is legislation introduced by Senator Tom Harkin of Iowa called the Complete Streets 

Act. Your thoughts, if you would, on that legislation? And on another piece of legislation called Safe Routes to School Program, 

which I suspect you are familiar with by virtue of your own work. 

Take a minute on each of those, if you would, Complete Streets and 

the Safe Routes to School Program. 

Mr. MENDEZ. Yes. Mr. Senator, I think what I would fall back 

on is not just my experience back in Arizona, because the Safe 

Routes to School Program was a critical program for us, but the 

concept of Complete Streets. I think when you bring all of that together, they fit very neatly within what I believe is Secretary 

LaHood’s livability concepts. 

Now, being a nominee, I have not had the privilege to actually 

delve into the details of his concepts. But I believe what you just 

described in terms of the projects, or these programs, are where 

you really bring the livability concepts to the table. One of the 

things that I mentioned earlier is that, as one of our strategies 

with regard to greenhouse gas emissions, if in fact we are trying 

to stem the growth of vehicle mileage travel, these are some of the 

exact same programs that fit within those strategies. 

Senator CARPER. Do you have anything else that you would like 

to say? 

Mr. MENDEZ. Pardon me? 

Senator CARPER. Do you have anything else that you would like 

to say on either of those two programs? 

Mr. MENDEZ. Well, I think they fit very neatly within those concepts. I know Safe Routes to School, back in Arizona, was a very 

big hit for us. 

Senator CARPER. The President has just announced increases in 

the fuel efficiency standards so that by 2016, I believe, our fleet 

has to be up to about 35 or 36 miles per gallon. The last time we 

had a dramatic increase in CAFE standards was back, I think, in 

the 1970s. Between 1975 and 1985, we increased the standards by 

well over half. We found out that people drove a whole lot more. 

We ended up with a lot more vehicles and we ended up using a 

whole lot more fuel. 
52 

My question is, transportation, I think, after utilities, yields the 

most amount of CO2 of any source of our economy and some of feel 

that, even if we increase fuel efficiency standards dramatically, we 

just simply drive more cars, end up with more time stuck in traffic, 

that we are not going to be really ahead of the game. 

I want to ask you, do you think that the United States Department of Transportation should support more robust regional planning for transportation emission reductions with a real focus on 

CO2 emissions? Do you believe that Federal supported projects that 

reduce transportation emissions should be a goal of climate change 

legislation? 

Mr. MENDEZ. Mr. Senator, as I mentioned earlier, being the 

nominee, I have not had the opportunity to drill into the Secretary’s thoughts on a lot of these issues. I can say that—— 

Senator CARPER. I think that he is going to yield to you for advice on this stuff, so—— 

Mr. MENDEZ. Well, I hope that I have a lot of input into that. 

But I really think that those issues that you raise are going to very 

important for all of us to work collectively, in concert with the rest 

of the Members of Congress and with the Administration so that 

we can address those exact same issues. 

Senator CARPER. I will ask it again. Do you agree that the Department of Transportation should support more robust regional 

planning for transportation emission reductions? 

Mr. MENDEZ. Mr. Senator, what I am prepared to do is to work 

with all of you on these strategies that will, in fact, have an impact 

on greenhouse gas emissions and if your idea is one of those that 

needs to be on table, I certainly would be more than happy to deal 

with that. 

Senator CARPER. I will ask the second question again. Do you believe that the federally supported projects that reduce transportation emissions should be a goal of climate change legislation? 

Mr. MENDEZ. Are you referring to specific projects or general policy issues? 

Senator CARPER. General policy issues. 

Mr. MENDEZ. Yes, I believe as we look at the reduction of greenhouse or climate change, however we want to frame that, with respect to transportation, it is going to be important for all us to look 

at all of these concepts. 

Senator CARPER. With that, we will conclude this hearing. Thank 

you. 

[Whereupon, at 11:15 a.m., the Committee was adjourned.] 

[An additional statement submitted for the record follows:] 

STATEMENT OF HON. BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, U.S. SENATOR

FROM THE STATE OF MARYLAND

Madam Chairman, thank you for holding this nomination hearing. I would like 

to thank and welcome Mr. Mendez for coming before our Committee to discuss the 

condition of the United States’ highway system and his nomination to lead the Federal Highway Administration charged with the management of this vitally important infrastructure network. 

Our country’s highways connect together communities, big and small, from coast 

to coast. We often take the service and convenience that our roads provide us for 

granted, which may explain why our highway infrastructure has fallen into such 

disrepair. 
53 

The Road Information Project, a non-partisan national transportation research 

group, estimates that motorists spend 4.2 billion hours a year stuck in traffic at a 

cost of $78.2 billion a year—which works out to $710 per person. Drivers in the 

Washington, DC metropolitan area have to cope with some of the worst traffic congestion in the country—only to be outdone by the metropolitan regions of Los Angeles and San Francisco/Oakland in the Chairwoman’s home State. 

The Road Information Project also found that 33 percent of America’s major roads 

are in poor or mediocre condition and 36 percent of the Nation’s major urban highways are congested. The American Society of Civil Engineers gave U.S. roads the 

abysmal grade of ‘‘D¥‘‘ in its 2009 infrastructure report card. 

The 2007 National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study, commissioned by Congress, determined it would cost $187 billion annually to adequately 

address the outstanding maintenance and repair backlog for roads across the country. Maryland has a backlog of $650 million worth of projects, and in Maryland we 

take a ‘‘fix-it first’’ approach to highway maintenance and repair. 

Expanding the Nation’s highway system without first addressing the maintenance 

and repair needs of existing roads just compounds the problem over time. I would 

strongly encourage your agency to focus attention on fixing and improving the efficiency of existing highways and roads over expanding the system. I look forward to 

hearing your thoughts on addressing the highway maintenance backlog and what 

you see as the Federal Highway Administration’s service and construction priorities. 

Let me shift your attention for a moment to two environmental issues as they relate to the Federal Highway System. 

Maryland and our neighboring States share the important responsibility of caring 

for the country’s most productive estuary, the Chesapeake Bay. There are two particular environmental threats to the Bay, and water resources around the country, 

from highways and roads that the Federal Highway Administration must pay greater attention to: Polluted Stormwater runoff from highways and Greenhouse Gas 

emissions from the transportation sector. 

Pollutants washed off roads include deicing agents, heavy metals, nitrogen, phosphorus, bacteria and sediment to local waterways. 

Statistics from the Maryland State Highway Administration provide an illustrative example of the magnitude of the challenge. As of October 30, 2008, SHA calculates that 90 percent of Maryland State highways in the State’s eight largest 

counties funnel pollution to the Chesapeake Bay 24 hours a day. 

EPA considers stormwater to be the largest source of water pollution in the country and this is a problem that grows larger with every new strip of highway. There 

are ways to reduce the flow of runoff and treat stormwater onsite using green infrastructure techniques that help preserve the natural hydrology of the landscape. I 

urge you to make water resource protection a priority for the Federal Highway Administration. 

The transportation sector is estimated to contribute nearly a third of the greenhouse gases contributing to the climate crisis and therefore reducing emissions from 

the transportation sector is critical in finding solutions to climate change. I hope 

that we can work quickly to get you confirmed and I look forward to working with 

you to help build a more efficient multi-modal transportation system that helps people spend less time in their automboiles—idling in traffic and pumping more CO2

into the atmosphere—and more time at their destinations. 

Your expertise and experience with transportation issues are impressive and you 

are a clear leader in the transportation sector. I look forward to hearing your testimony. 

Æ