alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 9, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 12963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5384]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than April 1, 2011.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Community State Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust, 
Union Grove, Wisconsin, to acquire up to 850 shares of Union 
Bancorporation, Inc., Union Grove, Wisconsin, and increase its 
ownership up to 38.24 percent, and thereby indirectly increase its 
control of Community State Bank, Union Grove, Wisconsin.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 4, 2011.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2011-5384 Filed 3-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
§ 51.62 Enforcement by the Attorney General. ( a ) The Attorney General is authorized to bring civil actions for appropriate relief against violations of the Act's provisions, including section 5. See section 12(d).
( b ) Certain violations of section 5 may be subject to criminal sanctions. See section 12(a) and (c).
Cover Coughs

and Sneezes

Stop the spread of germs

that can make you and others sick!

Cover your 

mouth and nose 

with a tissue

when you 

sneeze or cough.

Wash hands 

often, especially

after coughing 

or sneezing.

If you don’t 

have a tissue, 

use your 

elbow.

CS 316683-E 05/06/2020

cdc.gov/coronavirus
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION HAS BEEN EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FILED IN ITEM 1 TO THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,108
<SECURITIES>                                    12,301
<RECEIVABLES>                                      346
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,161<F1>
<PP&E>                                           7,585
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,580
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,627
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,671
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            73
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,710
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    50,627
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,158
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,080<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 153
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,886)<F3>
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,786)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.54)
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES ASSETS HELD-FOR-SALE OF $25,757.
<F2>INCLUDES CO-OWNERSHIP PROGRAM OF $2,698 AND DEPRECIATION OF $382.
<F3>INCLUDES EQUITY IN LOSS OF AFFILIATE OF $301.
</FN>


</TABLE>
### §315. Changes or assignment to duty

The Secretary of Commerce is authorized to make such changes or assignment to duty in the personnel or detailed force of the National Weather Service for limiting or reducing expenses as he may deem necessary.

(Mar. 2, 1895, ch. 169, 28 Stat. 737; 1940 Reorg. Plan No. IV, §8, eff. June 30, 1940, 5 F.R. 2421, 54 Stat. 1236; 1965 Reorg. Plan No. 2, eff. July 13, 1965, 30 F.R. 8819, 79 Stat. 1318; 1970 Reorg. Plan No. 4, eff. Oct. 3, 1970, 35 F.R. 15627, 84 Stat. 2090.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Weather Bureau consolidated with Coast and Geodetic Survey to form new agency in Department of Commerce known as Environmental Science Services Administration by Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1965, eff. July 13, 1965, 30 F.R. 8819, 79 Stat. 1318, set out as a note under section 311 of this title. Functions of Bureau and Chief of Bureau transferred to Secretary of Commerce by Reorg. Plan. Subsequently, Environmental Science Services Administration abolished and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration established. By Department Organization Order 25–5A, Secretary delegated to NOAA his functions under this chapter of the Code. By order of Acting Associate Administrator of NOAA, organizational name of Weather Bureau changed to National Weather Service. For further details, see Codification note set out under section 311 of this title.
#### § 1208.2 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to clarify the provisions which a State must have incorporated into its laws in order to prevent the withholding of Federal-aid highway funds for noncompliance with the National Minimum Drinking Age.
### §410rr–4. Management plan

Within 3 full fiscal years from the date funding is made available for the purposes of preparing a general management plan, the Secretary shall develop and transmit to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives, a general management plan for the park consistent with the purposes of this subchapter, including (but not limited to)—

(1) a general visitor use and interpretive program that fully considers the prehistoric and historic aspects of the national historical park including the "gateway theme" and early Spanish settlement of New Mexico;

(2) a statement on the number of visitors and types of public uses within the park which can be reasonably accommodated in accordance with the protection of its resources; and

(3) a general development plan for the park, including the estimated cost thereof.

(Pub. L. 101–313, title II, §205, June 27, 1990, 104 Stat. 279; Pub. L. 103–437, §6(d)(12), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4584.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–437 in introductory provisions substituted "Natural Resources" for "Interior and Insular Affairs" after "Committee on".
Exhibit (10)(k)(k)

                              SUMMARY OF SHORT TERM
                           INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN


 o    The Guilford Mills, Inc. Short Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the
      "Plan") provides for the payment of annual cash bonuses to participating
      employees.

 o    Senior management will select each year which employees will participate
      in the Plan. An individual's participation in the Plan for any given plan
      year will not guarantee participation in the Plan in any subsequent plan
      year.

 o    Cash bonuses under the Plan are determined according to a formula based
      upon a percentage of the participant's base salary (with appropriate pro
      rata adjustments to be made if a participant's base salary changes during
      a plan year) and one or more performance measures.

 o    The nature of the performance measures will vary from participant to
      participant. Any bonus payable to the Company's Chief Executive Officer
      will be based on a single performance measure (the Company's earnings per
      share results for the plan year). For other participants, the bonus
      calculation will include earnings per share results and one or more of the
      following performance measures: (1) a matrix based upon corporate sales
      and net income performance, (2) a matrix based upon business unit sales
      and operating income performance and (3) other performance measures,
      determined by a supervisor, specific to a participant's responsibilities.

 o    The "matrix" component of a participant's bonus under the Plan is subject
      to adjustment, plus or minus 20%, based upon the Company's return on net
      assets (RONA) which is calculated as follows:

                              EBIT x (1 - Tax Rate)
                      -------------------------------------
                      Equity + LTD + Current Portion of LTD

 o    Bonuses payable under the Plan, if any, with respect to a plan year will
      be paid after the Company's public announcement of its financial results
      for such year. An individual who was selected to participate in the Plan
      in a given plan year must be an active, full time employee of the Company
      or one of its subsidiaries at the time bonuses under the Plan are paid for
      such year in order to be eligible to receive any bonus under the Plan. If
      a participant's employment is terminated for any reason whatsoever prior
      to the date such bonus payments are paid by the Company, then the
      participant will not be eligible to receive any payment under the Plan.

 o    The Company reserves the right to amend, modify, terminate or alter the
      Plan at any time, in its discretion, in a non-discriminatory fashion.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Homer L. Bretsch, Appellant, v. The Board of Education of the City of New York and Others, Respondents and Appellants.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present —Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Putnam, JJ.
• 嚴重疾病

• 住院治療

• 肺炎

• 早產和緊急剖腹產

• 死亡

請今天就向您的

醫生詢問流感疫苗

相關事宜!

接種疫苗既可以保護孕婦,又可以保護孩子,讓他們避免罹患流感和流感相關的併發症。

孕婦

處於因流感而罹患嚴重

併發症的風險之中

美國衛生及公共服務部

疾病管制署

如需瞭解更多資訊,請造訪 http://www.flu.gov 或致電 1-800-CDC-INFO

CS244594-D
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

May 28, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-13673

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 07-00051-CR-T-26-TBM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

AMIN HERNANDEZ-PEREA,

Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(May 28, 2008)

Before BIRCH, DUBINA and BLACK, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:

Grady C. Irvin, Jr., appointed counsel for Amin Hernandez-Perea in this

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
2

1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hernandez-Perea’s conviction

and sentence are AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 10(d)
<PAGE>
                                       2

                               [SiCOM LETTERHEAD]

                                                               September 2, 1999





827109 Alberta Ltd.
#205, 999 - 8th Street SW
Calgary, AB  T2R 1J5

Dear Sirs:

With reference of the License Agreement  between SiCom Solutions Inc.  ("SiCom")
and  827109  Alberta  Ltd.  ("AlbertaCo"),  dated June 1,  1999,  Section  5(a),
Consideration,  "a lump-sum fee of $50,000.00  (CAD)  payable  within sixty (60)
days from the effective date of this Agreement," we hereby  acknowledge  receipt
of $20,000.00 (CAD).

Further,  we grant a three (3) month  extension to AlbertaCo  for payment of the
balance of funds in the amount of $30,000.00 until November 1, 1999.

Yours truly,

SiCOM SOLUTIONS INC.


/s/ "Paul Davis"

Paul Davis
President
Exhibit 10.5


 


Annual Compensation of Non-Employee Directors


 


	 	 	2016	 	 	2015	 	 	2014	 
	Name/Position	 	Retainer	 	 	Retainer	 	 	Retainer	 
	Martin S. Friedman, Non-Employee Director	 	$	36,000	 	 	$	36,000	 	 	$	36,000	 
	Thomas M. Kody, Non-Employee Director	 	$	36,000	 	 	$	36,000	 	 	$	36,000	 
	John W. Edgemond IV, Non-Employee Director	 	$	36,000	 	 	$	36,000	 	 	$	36,000	 
	J. Randolph Babbitt, Non-Employee Director	 	$	36,000	 	 	$	36,000	 	 	$	36,000	 
	James L. Jadlos, Chairman and Non-Employee Director(1)	 	$	-	 	 	$	33,000	 	 	$	48,000	 
	Michael G. Anzilotti, Chairman and Non-Employee Director(2)	 	$	48,000	 	 	$	42,000	 	 	$	33,000	 



 


		(1)	Effective June 18, 2015, Mr. Jadlos resigned as Chairman and as a Director.



		(2)	Effective June 18, 2015, Mr. Anzilotti was elected as Chairman.



 


The Non-Employee Directors will be paid the 2016 retainer in
monthly installments.


 


In addition to the annual retainer, the Compensation Committee
conducts an annual evaluation of the performance under criteria similar to that used for its executive officer cash bonuses for
payment of annual incentives to the Non-Employee Directors.  Such incentives are paid in the following year in cash, stock
option awards or some combination thereof.
### §3213. Future executive branch actions

(a) No future executive branch action which withdraws more than five thousand acres, in the aggregate, of public lands within the State of Alaska shall be effective except by compliance with this subsection. To the extent authorized by existing law, the President or the Secretary may withdraw public lands in the State of Alaska exceeding five thousand acres in the aggregate, which withdrawal shall not become effective until notice is provided in the Federal Register and to both Houses of Congress. Such withdrawal shall terminate unless Congress passes a joint resolution of approval within one year after the notice of such withdrawal has been submitted to Congress.

(b) No further studies of Federal lands in the State of Alaska for the single purpose of considering the establishment of a conservation system unit, national recreation area, national conservation area, or for related or similar purposes shall be conducted unless authorized by this Act or further Act of Congress.

(Pub. L. 96–487, title XIII, §1326, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2488.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in subsec. (b), is Pub. L. 96–487, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2371, known as the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3101 of this title and Tables.
#### Peeples *et al. v.*Wilson.

Atkinson, J.

1. In a suit for land, where the plaintiff relied for recovery on .prescriptive title, based on actual adverse possession without color of title for a period of twenty years, as provided in the Civil Code, § 3588, and there was evidence tending to show such possession of some part of the land less than the whole, in charging the law of prescription the jury should have been so instructed as to restrict a recovery under such claim of prescription to such part of the land as was in actual possession of the prescribor for the requisite period'; and the more especially should the judge not have refused so to charge upon timely and appropriate written request.

*(a)*The evidence tending to establish a prescription by seven years adverse possession under color of title was not without conflict, and was not of such character as to have rendered harmless the error committed • by'refusing to charge in accordance with the ruling announced in the above note.

2. On oral argument before this court the assignments of error referred to in the first, second, and third grounds of the amended motion for new *601trial were expressly abandoned. Except as indicated in tlie first headnote, other grounds are insufficient to require the grant of a new trial.

June 16, 1910.

Equitable petition. Before Judge .Fite. Murray superior court.

July 12, 1909.

*W. W. Sampler, C. N. King,*and *W. K. Mann,*for plaintiffs in error. *G. L. Henry*and *Maddox, McCamy Shumate,*contra.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
EXHIBIT 21

Subsidiaries of Company

                                 Percentage Owned         State of
Subsidiaries                          by Company         Incorporation

EdVISION Corporation                     100               California

Harland Business Products, Inc.          100               Delaware

Harland dataPRINT, Inc.                  100               Georgia

Harland Financial Solutions, Inc.        100               Oregon

Harland International Company            100               Georgia

HFS Core Systems, Inc.                   100               Delaware

HFS Phoenix Systems, Inc.                100               Delaware

Interlinq Software Corporation           100               Washington

Intrieve, Incorporated                   100               Ohio

John H. Harland Company of Puerto Rico   100               Georgia

Liberty Checks and Services, Inc.        100               Minnesota

Scantron Corporation                     100               Delaware

The Check Store, Inc.                    100               Georgia

This list excludes subsidiaries which, considered in the aggregate as a single
subsidiary, would not constitute a "significant subsidiary".
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET OF WESTERN FINANCIAL  CORPORATION AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND THE
RELATED  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS  AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE NINE MONTHS THEN ENDED
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 27, 2020

b1019

Order 

Clerk

October 27, 2020

160782(21)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 160782

COA: 350561

Wayne CC: 09-004221-FC

JOSHUA LOPP,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s July 28, 2020 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that reconsideration 

of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-31143

Summary Calendar

__________________

JUVENTINO MUNOZ,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KEITH SIMONE ET AL.,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. CA-95-2559-L

- - - - - - - - - -

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

___________________

No. 95-31304

Summary Calendar

__________________

JUVENTINO MUNOZ,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GLEN JAMBON, Major,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 94-CV-4192-J

- - - - - - - - - -

May 16, 1996
Nos. 95-31143 & 95-31304

-2-

 

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

Before GARWOOD, WIENER, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Juventino Munoz appeals the dismissal of two civil rights

complaints. In the first, Munoz argues that the district court

erred by dismissing his use-of-force and denial-of-medical-care

claims as time-barred. See Munoz v. Simone, No. CA-95-2559-L

(E.D. La.; Oct. 30, 1995). We have reviewed the record and

Munoz's brief and AFFIRM the district court's dismissal of the

claims for the same reasons set forth by the district court. Id.

 In the second, Munoz argues in general terms that the

district court abused its discretion by dismissing as frivolous

his complaint wherein he alleged that his legal mail was opened

outside of his presence. As the district court's dismissal was

for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted,

Munoz's arguments on appeal are unavailing and we AFFIRM the

dismissal for the same reasons set forth by the district court. 

See Munoz v. Jambon, No. 94-CV-4192-J (E.D. La.; Feb. 10, 1995).

 No. 95-31143 AFFIRMED.

 No. 95-31304 AFFIRMED.