alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Wear a face mask that 

covers your nose and mouth. 

And keep your distance (at 

least 6 feet) from others 

when you can. 

Wash your hands often with 

soap and water. If soap and 

water aren’t available, use 

an alcohol-based hand 

sanitizer.

Getting a flu vaccine is 

more important than ever. 

Everyone 6 months and 

older should get a flu 

vaccine every season. 

Your work is essential!

Protect yourself & others from flu and COVID-19 this fall and winter:

MASK UP LATHER UP SLEEVE UP

Learn more at cdc.gov/flu

CS319348D

A flu vaccine can protect you, your loved ones, and your co-workers from flu.

You can also protect those around you by staying home if you are sick. 

CS319348D
FROM: THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT. COUNTY OF LEWIS AND CLARK,

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. RAYMOND KROLL, Defendant.

NO. BDC-89-137 DECISION

On March 30,1990, the Defendant was sentenced to ten (10) years with five (5) years suspended plus conditions for the Revocation of *47Felony Assault; the Petitioner must successfully complete chemical dependency treatment; as soon as possible be considered for a pre-release or halfway house; $2,114.23 in restitution; 52 days credit for time served.

DATED this 6th day of December, 1990.

On December 6, 1990, the Defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The Defendant was present and was represented by Paul Befumo, of the Montana Defender Project. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the Defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it if such is possible. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

After careful consideration, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence imposed shall remain the same.

The reason for the decision is pursuant to Rule 17 of the Sentence Review Division.
§ 450.330 TIP action by the FHWA and the FTA. ( a ) The FHWA and the FTA shall jointly find that each metropolitan TIP is consistent with the metropolitan transportation plan produced by the continuing and comprehensive transportation process carried on cooperatively by the MPO, the State(s), and the public transportation operator(s) in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 134 and 49 U.S.C. 5303. This finding shall be based on the self-certification statement submitted by the State and MPO under § 450.336, a review of the metropolitan transportation plan by the FHWA and the FTA, and upon other reviews as deemed necessary by the FHWA and the FTA.
( b ) In nonattainment and maintenance areas, the MPO, as well as the FHWA and the FTA, shall determine conformity of any updated or amended TIP, in accordance with 40 CFR part 93. After the FHWA and the FTA issue a conformity determination on the TIP, the TIP shall be incorporated, without change, into the STIP, directly or by reference.
( c ) If an MPO has not updated the metropolitan transportation plan in accordance with the cycles defined in § 450.324(c), projects may only be advanced from a TIP that was approved and found to conform (in nonattainment and maintenance areas) prior to expiration of the metropolitan transportation plan and meets the TIP update requirements of § 450.326(a). Until the MPO approves (in attainment areas) or the FHWA and the FTA issue a conformity determination on (in nonattainment and maintenance areas) the updated metropolitan transportation plan, the MPO may not amend the TIP.
( d ) In the case of extenuating circumstances, the FHWA and the FTA will consider and take appropriate action on requests to extend the STIP approval period for all or part of the TIP in accordance with § 450.220(b).
( e ) If an illustrative project is included in the TIP, no Federal action may be taken on that project by the FHWA and the FTA until it is formally included in the financially constrained and conforming metropolitan transportation plan and TIP.
( f ) Where necessary in order to maintain or establish operations, the FHWA and the FTA may approve highway and transit operating assistance for specific projects or programs, even though the projects or programs may not be included in an approved TIP.
[81 FR 34135, May 27, 2016, as amended at 81 FR 93473, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 56545, Nov. 29, 2017]
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 01-3918

___________ Tracey Allen McGhghy, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Northern * District of Iowa. United States of America; Federal * Bureau of Investigation, sued as * [UNPUBLISHED] Agents of the FBI, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: February 19, 2002 Filed: February 22, 2002

___________ Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Tracey Allen McGhghy appeals the district court's preservice dismissal of McGhghy's lawsuit against the United States and unknown Federal Bureau of Investigation agents. McGhghy's lawsuit is based on constitutional and tort claims arising out of the handling of his property stored in a rental unit in Olin, Iowa. McGhghy also appeals the denial of his requests for postjudgment relief. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the dismissal was proper, and we find no-2- abuse of discretion in the district court's denial of postjudgment relief. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
§ 500.108 SMS. An SMS is a systematic process with the goal of reducing the number and severity of traffic crashes by ensuring that all opportunities to improve highway safety are identified, considered, implemented as appropriate, and evaluated in all phases of highway planning, design, construction, maintenance, and operation and by providing information for selecting and implementing effective highway safety strategies and projects. The development of the SMS may be based on the guidance in “Safety Management Systems: Good Practices for Development and Implementation.”[3] An effective SMS should include, at a minimum: ( a ) Communication, coordination, and cooperation among the organizations responsible for the roadway, human, and vehicle safety elements;
( b ) A focal point for coordination of the development, establishment, and implementation of the SMS among the agencies responsible for these major safety elements;
( c ) Establishment of short- and long-term highway safety goals to address identified safety problems;
( d ) Collection, analysis, and linkage of highway safety data;
( e ) Identification of the safety responsibilities of units and positions;
( f ) Public information and education activities; and
( g ) Identification of skills, resources, and training needs to implement highway safety programs.
Footnotes -
500.108
[3] *Safety Management Systems: Good Practices for Development and Implementation,* FHWA and NHTSA, May 1996. Available for inspection and copying as prescribed in 49 CFR part 7, appendix D.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 698 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide equitable treatment 

for residents of Puerto Rico with respect to the refundable portion 

of the child tax credit and to provide the same treatment to families 

in Puerto Rico with one child or two children that is currently provided 

to island families with three or more children. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 7, 2019 

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself and Mr. RUBIO) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

equitable treatment for residents of Puerto Rico with 

respect to the refundable portion of the child tax credit 

and to provide the same treatment to families in Puerto 

Rico with one child or two children that is currently 

provided to island families with three or more children. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Child Tax Credit Eq5 uity for Puerto Rico Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 698 IS

1 SEC. 2. EQUITABLE TREATMENT FOR RESIDENTS OF PUER2 TO RICO WITH RESPECT TO THE REFUND3 ABLE PORTION OF THE CHILD TAX CREDIT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The second sentence of section 

5 24(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended 

6 by inserting ‘‘or section 933’’ after ‘‘section 112’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

9 December 31, 2018. 

10 SEC. 3. SAME TREATMENT OF FAMILIES IN PUERTO RICO 

11 WITH ONE CHILD OR TWO CHILDREN THAT IS 

12 CURRENTLY PROVIDED TO ISLAND FAMILIES 

13 WITH THREE OR MORE CHILDREN. 

14 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 24(d)(1) of the Internal 

15 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

16 the following: ‘‘In the case of an individual who is a bona 

17 fide resident of Puerto Rico during the entire taxable year, 

18 subparagraph (B)(ii) shall be applied by substituting ‘1 

19 or more qualifying children’ for ‘3 or more qualifying chil20 dren’.’’. 

21 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

22 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

23 December 31, 2018. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

CHRISTOPHER O. SMITH, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-5333 

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed February 13, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; J. Kevin Abdoney and Glenn T.

Shelby, Judges.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and 

Joanna Beth Conner, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and MORRIS and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 34 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the United Arab Emirates of certain 

defense articles and services. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the following proposed foreign military sale to the 

4 United Arab Emirates is prohibited: 

5 (1) The sale of the following defense articles, 

6 including defense services and technical data, de7 scribed in Transmittal No. 17–70, submitted to Con8 gress pursuant to section 36(b) of the Arms Export 

9 Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(b)) and published in 

10 the Congressional Record on June 4, 2019: The pro11 posed sale of 331 Javelin Guided Missiles with con12 tainer; System Integration and Checkout (SICO) 

13 service; Field Service Representative; United States 

14 Government and contractor technical and logistic 
2 

†SJ 34 ES 

1 support services’ tools and test equipment; and other 

2 related elements of logistics and program support. 

Passed the Senate June 20, 2019. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 34 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proEmirates of certain defense articles and services. posed foreign military sale to the United Arab
### §3704. Administrative services and support

#### (a) Provision of services

The Secretary may provide personnel, facilities, and other administrative services to the Foundation, including reimbursement of expenses under section 3702 of this title, not to exceed then current Federal Government per diem rates, for a period of up to five years from March 26, 1984.

#### (b) Reimbursement

The Foundation may reimburse the Secretary for any administrative service provided under subsection (a). The Secretary shall deposit any reimbursement received under this subsection into the Treasury to the credit of the appropriations then current and chargeable for the cost of providing such services.

Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to continue to provide facilities, and necessary support services for such facilities, to the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation after March 26, 1989, on a space available, reimbursable cost basis.

(Pub. L. 98–244, §5, Mar. 26, 1984, 98 Stat. 109; Pub. L. 100–240, §3, Jan. 11, 1988, 101 Stat. 1786; Pub. L. 100–653, title IX, §903, Nov. 14, 1988, 102 Stat. 3834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–653 inserted provision at end authorizing Secretary of the Interior to continue to provide facilities and necessary support services to National Fish and Wildlife Foundation after Mar. 26, 1989, on space available, reimbursable cost basis.

Pub. L. 100–240 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, and struck out ", and may accept reimbursement therefor, to be deposited in the Treasury to the credit of the appropriations then current and chargeable for the cost of providing such services" after "March 26, 1984", and added subsec. (b).
#### § 31.300 [Reserved]
### §256c. Forfeiture of property used in hunting, fishing, etc.

All guns, bows, traps, nets, seines, fishing tackle, clothing, teams, horses, machinery, logging equipment, motor vehicles, aircraft, boats, or means of transportation of every nature or description used by any person or persons or organizations within the limits of the park when engaged in or attempting to engage in killing, trapping, ensnaring, taking or capturing such wild birds, fish or animals, or taking, destroying or damaging such trees, plants, or mineral deposits contrary to the provisions of this Act or the rules and regulations promulgated by the Secretary of the Interior shall be forfeited to the United States and may be seized by the officers in the park and held pending prosecution of any person or persons or organization arrested under or charged with violating the provisions of this Act, and upon conviction under this Act of such persons or organizations using said guns, bows, traps, nets, seines, fishing tackle, clothing, teams, horses, machinery, logging equipment, motor vehicles, aircraft, boats, or other means of transportation of every nature and description used by any person or persons or organization, such forfeiture shall be adjudicated as a penalty in addition to the other punishment prescribed in this Act. Such forfeited property shall be disposed of and accounted for by and under the authority of the Secretary of the Interior: Provided, That the forfeiture of teams, horses, machinery, logging equipment, motor vehicles, aircraft, boats, or other means of transportation shall be in the discretion of the Court.

(Mar. 6, 1942, ch. 151, §4, 56 Stat. 136; Pub. L. 100–668, title I, §104(b), Nov. 16, 1988, 102 Stat. 3962.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is act Mar. 6, 1942, which is classified to sections 256 to 256i of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–668 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "All guns, traps, nets, seines, fishing tackle, teams, horses, or means of transportation of every nature or description used by any person or persons within the limits of the park when engaged in killing, trapping, ensnaring, taking, or capturing such wild birds, fish, or animals contrary to the provisions of this Act or the rules and regulations promulgated by the Secretary of the Interior shall be forfeited to the United States and may be seized by the officers in the park and held pending prosecution of any person or persons arrested under the charge of violating the provisions of this Act, and upon conviction under this Act of such person or persons using said guns, traps, nets, seines, fishing tackle, teams, horses, or other means of transportation, such forfeiture shall be adjudicated as a penalty in addition to the other punishment prescribed in this Act. Such forfeited property shall be disposed of and accounted for by and under the authority of the Secretary of the Interior: Provided, That the forfeiture of teams, horses, or other means of transportation shall be in the discretion of the court."
SERVED: SEPTEMBER 23, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

ARCTIC AIR ALASKA, INC. 

DOCKET NO. FAA 2014-0316 

(Civil Penalty Action). 

AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER 

Arctic Air Alaska, Inc. (hereinafter "Respondent") filed a letter dated September 

8, 2014. We will treat the letter as a response to our Show Cause Order. 

Paragraphs #2 and #3 of the Procedural Order are amended as follows: 

WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the following 

procedural schedule: 

1. On or before January 5, 2015, the parties shall conclude all discovery 

including, but not limited to, depositions, document production, responses 

to production requests and/or interrogatories. If the parties cannot resolve 

a discovery dispute they shall submit the dispute to the undersigned for 

resolution in a timely manner; 

2. The parties shall be prepared to present this case at a hearing on or after 

January 5, 2015, subject to the availability of courtroom facilities. The 

specific date and time for the hearing will be forthcoming in a separate 

Order. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

1 

;, '.-
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE 

COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A venue, 

S.W. Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 000 1 

James I. Hamilton, President /CEO 

Arctic Air Alaska, Inc., R e.spondent 

3540 University Ave. South 

Fairbanks, AK 99709 

Peter Lynch, Complainant's Counsel 

Assistant Chief Counsel for 

Enforcement 

Office of the Chief Counsel, AGC-300 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

TEL: 202-267-7728 

FAX: 202-267-5106 

ONE COPY 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0316 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by p.s. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federa 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
### §4101. Congressional statement of purposes

The purposes of this chapter are—

(1) to promote and encourage State activities in support of the management of interjurisdictional fishery resources;

(2) to promote and encourage management of interjurisdictional fishery resources throughout their range; and

(3) to promote and encourage research in preparation for the implementation of the use of ecosystems and interspecies approaches to the conservation and management of interjurisdictional fishery resources throughout their range.

(Pub. L. 99–659, title III, §302, Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3732; Pub. L. 107–372, title III, §302(b), Dec. 19, 2002, 116 Stat. 3095.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title III of Pub. L. 99–659, Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3731, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of title III to the Code, see Short Title note set out below and Tables.

#### Amendments

2002—Par. (3). Pub. L. 107–372 added par. (3).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 99–659, title III, §310, Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3736, provided that: "This title [enacting this chapter and repealing chapter 10D (§779 et seq.) of this title] takes effect October 1, 1987."

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 99–659, title III, §301, Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3731, provided that: "This title [enacting this chapter and repealing chapter 10D (§779 et seq.) of this title] may be cited as the 'Interjurisdictional Fisheries Act of 1986'."
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 33 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 33

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign 
 military sale to the United Arab Emirates of certain defense articles 
                             and services.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the following proposed 
foreign military sale to the United Arab Emirates is prohibited:
            (1) The sale of the following defense articles, including 
        defense services and technical data, described in Transmittal 
        No. 17-73, submitted to Congress pursuant to section 36(b) of 
        the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(b)) and published 
        in the Congressional Record on June 4, 2019: The proposed sale 
        of 20,004 Advanced Precision Kill Weapon Systems (APKWS) II 
        All-Up-Rounds; weapons support and test equipment; spares; 
        technical publications; personnel training; other training 
        equipment; transportation; United States Government and 
        contractor engineering; technical and logistics support 
        services; and other related elements of logistical and program 
        support.

            Passed the Senate June 20, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. J. RES. 33

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

    Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign 
 military sale to the United Arab Emirates of certain defense articles 
                             and services.
```
#### Wilson *v.*Brock.

Evans, P. J.

1. In an action by a husband for criminal conversation with his wife, an amendment alleging that the defendant administered drugs to the plaintiff’s wife as a means of accomplishing- her debauchery, and that as soon as he discovered the illicit relations between his wife and the defendant the plaintiff took his children and separated from his wife, is germane to the original action.

2. There was no evidence to show connivance and collusion of the husband with the wife’s adulterous intercourse, and a request for an instruction relating to the effect of such connivance and collusion was properly refused.

3. In so far as the requests to’ charge relating to acts occurring without the statute of limitation were pertinent and legal, they were covered by the general charge.

4. Certain instructions are criticised as being- without evidence to support them; upon an examination of the record we do not think this criticism is meritorious.

*783July 13, 1910.

Action for damages. Before Judge Brand. Banks superior court.

June 19, 1909.

*H. H. Perry, Johnson & Johnson, A. J. Griffin, C. R. Faulkner,*and *R. R. Arnold,*for plaintiff in error.

*H. H. Dean, R. L. J. Smith,*and *W. W. Stark,*contra.

5. It was not erroneous to refuse a new trial on the ground of newly discovered. evidence, as the showing on this ground did not measure up to the rule as expressed in *Berry*v. *State,*10 *Ga.*511.

ti. The evidence authorized the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and Iris discretion in refusing' a new trial will not be interfered with. *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*