alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's financial statements for the first, second and third quarters of 1997
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                            <C>            <C>            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS          6-MOS          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1996    DEC-31-1996    DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                   MAR-31-1997    JUN-30-1997    SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                              23,786          8,533          9,459
<SECURITIES>                             0              0            152
<RECEIVABLES>                       72,269         69,060         68,938
<ALLOWANCES>                         3,081          2,784          2,315
<INVENTORY>                         28,297         24,861         25,225
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   129,083        125,264        123,687
<PP&E>                             223,218        229,510        239,038
<DEPRECIATION>                     119,799        122,675        126,411
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     435,583        417,597        404,728
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              124,897        104,100         87,707
<BONDS>                            110,030        109,380        109,390
<COMMON>                            37,907         37,907         37,907
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0              0              0
<PREFERRED>                              0              0              0
<OTHER-SE>                         172,103        152,132        155,553
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       435,583        417,597        404,728
<SALES>                            139,266        278,958        421,056
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   139,266        278,958        421,056
<CGS>                               79,489        161,291        243,869
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       79,489        161,291        243,869
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0              0              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0              0              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   2,419          4,597          6,626
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      8,586         19,854         28,109
<INCOME-TAX>                         3,563          8,239         11,665
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  5,023         11,615         16,444
<DISCONTINUED>                           0              0              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0              0              0
<CHANGES>                                0              0              0
<NET-INCOME>                         5,023         11,615         16,444
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          .16            .37            .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                          .16            .37            .53




</TABLE>
Failsafe Overview

A failsafe is a pre-programmed behavior designed to prevent a crash in the event of an unsafe 

situation. All ArduCopter vehicles include a GPS failsafe activated by default. 3DR RTF copters 

are also preset with radio control (RC) and low battery failsafe behaviors.

Loss of GPS signal

If the drone looses GPS signal in a flight mode that requires GPS (loiter, auto, return-to-launch, 

guided), it will land automatically, indicated by a blinking blue and yellow status LED and a 

high-high-high-low tone. Always fly outside in an open area to improve GPS signal strength.

Loss of RC signal

If the drone looses contact with the RC transmitter, it will land automatically, indicated by a 

blinking yellow status LED. If it looses RC signal during a mission, it will return to the launch 

point before landing.

Low battery

If the battery reaches 25% charge, the drone will land automatically, indicated by a blinking 

yellow status LED and a quick repeating tone. If the battery runs low during a mission, the drone 

will return to the launch point before landing.
### §2465. Enforcement

#### (a) In general

A violation of this chapter or any regulation promulgated under this chapter is deemed to be a violation of the Antarctic Marine Living Resources Convention Act (16 U.S.C. 2431–2444) and shall be enforced under that Act by the Under Secretary or another Federal official to whom the Under Secretary has delegated this responsibility.

#### (b) Penalty

If the Under Secretary determines that a person has violated section 2463 of this title—

(1) that person shall be ineligible to locate a mining claim under the mining laws of the United States; and

(2) the Secretary of the Interior shall refuse to issue a patent under the mining laws of the United States, or a lease under the laws of the United States related to mineral or geothermal leasing, to any such person who attempts to perfect such patent or lease application after the Under Secretary has made such determination.

(Pub. L. 101–594, §5, formerly §6, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 2977; renumbered §5, Pub. L. 104–227, title II, §202(c), Oct. 2, 1996, 110 Stat. 3044.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Antarctic Marine Living Resources Convention Act, referred to in subsec. (a), probably means the Antarctic Marine Living Resources Convention Act of 1984, title III of Pub. L. 98–623, Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3398, which is classified generally to chapter 44A (§2431 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2431 of this title and Tables.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5 of Pub. L. 101–594 was classified to section 2464 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 104–227.
#### § 550.44 Procedures for arranging drug counseling.

The contract center staff shall hold a program planning conference with a sentenced inmate who has drug aftercare as a condition of release. At this meeting, held within one week of the inmate's arrival at the center, plans are made for the inmate to receive drug counseling. The meeting is attended by center staff, the inmate, and the Chief U.S. Probation Officer or designee.
## Failsafe Overview

A failsafe is a pre

- programmed behavior designed to prevent a crash in the event of an unsafe situation. All ArduCopter vehicles include a GPS failsafe activated by default. 3DR RTF copters are also preset with radio control (RC) and low battery failsafe behaviors.


### Loss of GPS signal

If t he drone looses GPS signal in a flight mode that requires GPS (loiter, auto, return

- to

- launch, guided), it will land automatically, indicated by a blinking blue and yellow status LED and a high

- high

- high

- low tone. Always fly outside in an open area to impr ove GPS signal strength.


### Loss of RC signal

If the drone looses contact with the RC transmitter, it will land automatically, indicated by a blinking y ellow status LED. If it looses RC signal during a mission, it will return to the launch point before landing.


### Low battery

If the battery reaches 25% charge, the drone will land automatically, indicated by a blinking yellow status LED and a quick repeating tone. If the battery runs low during a mission, the drone will return to the launch point before landing.
# Electric Demand DRAFT -- DELIBERA

TIVE PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL 1

# Natural Gas Prices, Delivered DRAFT -- DELIBERA

TIVE PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL 2

# Levelized Cost of Electricity , New Units DRAFT -- DELIBERA

TIVE PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL 3 Note: For illustrative purposes, a delivered natural gas price of $9.60 per mmBtu is included. For context, historical prices of natural gas have never risen above $9.51 per mmBtu on an annual average, which occurred in 2008 (converted from Tcf , available at http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/n3045us3a.htm).

# New Coal Builds DRAFT -- DELIBERA

TIVE PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL 4
APPLICANTJIMMY CHARLES JOHNSON APPLICATION NO. WR-40,336-06 

### APPLICATION FOR 11.07 WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS ACTION TAKEN DISMISSED. NONCOMPLIANT WITH Tex. R. App. P. 73.1.



# tkTamU^ JUDGE rnATF DATE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0148

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL QUERFURTH,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 21, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 11 2023

07/11/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0148
No. 19,757.

#### Frances Irene Purcell *v.*The Poor Sisters of St. Francis Seraph.

(364 P. [2d] 184)

Decided August 21, 1961.

Mr. John F. Gallagher, Mr. Brian J. Mullett, for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. Murray, Baker and Wendelken, Mr. Gerald W. Bennett, for defendant in error.

*En Banc.*

*479Mr. Justice Frantz

delivered the opinion of the Court.

May a hospital rely upon C.R.S. ’53, 87-1-6, to thwart a claim against it for damages for an injury alleged to have been caused by its negligence in caring for a patient? An affirmative answer to this question would vindicate the judgment of the trial court in this case. A negative answer would require a reversal.

The Poor Sisters of St. Francis Seraph own and operate a hospital in Colorado Springs, Colorado. Suit was brought against the religious order by Frances Irene Purcell, alleging that she had been negligently burned while a patient in the hospital.

A summary judgment in favor of the hospital was granted, based upon C.R.S. ’53, 87-1-6, which provides:

> “No person shall be permitted to maintain an action, whether such action sound in tort or implied contract, to recover damages from any person licensed to practice medicine, chiropractic, osteopathy, chiropody, midwifery or dentistry on account of the alleged negligence of such person in the practice of the profession for which he is licensed or on account of his failure to possess or exercise that degree of skill which he actually or impliedly represented, promised or agreed that he did possess and would exercise, unless such action be instituted within two years after such cause of action accrued.”

Under C.R.S. ’53, 91-1-7, “a license to practice medicine shall be granted by the board to an applicant” who meets certain requirements. A license to operate a hospital “for the treatment or care of the sick or injured” is a prerequisite to the functioning of such an establishment, by C.R.S. ’53, 66-4-1. These enactments are expressions of the legislative will that the two callings require different licenses. These licenses authorize related but different activities, and the issuance of the one does not permit operation under the other.

We defer to that which the legislature plainly and unequivocally has treated as separate and distinct pur*480suits requiring different licenses. A hospital is not “licensed to practice medicine” as those words are used in C.R.S. ’53, 87-1-6. Hence, the limitations of that statute cannot be asserted to defeat the claim of Purcell.

These statutes deal with cognate subjects. Considered in respect to each other, they leave no room for doubt (if any could exist in view of the clarity of language employed) that a license “to practice medicine” does not contemplate hospital operations as coming within its terms. *Clark v. Murray,*141 Kans. 533, 41 P. (2d) 1042; *Fergus Motor Co. v. Sorenson,*73 Mont. 122, 235 Pac. 422.

The judgment is reversed.

Mr. Justice Moore not participating.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Analex Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
the undersigned, Ronald B. Alexander, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to § 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003.



(2) Based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
annual report.



(3) Based on my knowledge, the
financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this
annual report.



(4) The Companys other
certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:



a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to
ensure that material information relating to the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b. evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation.



(5) The Companys other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Companys auditors and the Audit Committee of the Companys Board of Directors:



a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Companys ability to
record, process, summarize, and report financial data and have identified for the issuers auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys
internal controls; and



(6) The Companys
other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent of the date of their evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



|                                           
|-------------------------------------------
|                                           
|/S/ Ronald B. Alexander                    
|Ronald B. Alexander Chief Financial Officer



March 29, 2004



1
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 53 (Friday, March 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 15039]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6525]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA Government/Industry NextGen Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Charter Renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
renewal of the RTCA Charter (FAA Order 1110.77T) for two years, 
effective April 2, 2011. The administrator is the sponsor of the 
committee. The objective of the advisory committee is to seek solutions 
to issues and challenges involving air transportation concepts, 
requirements, operational capabilities, and the associated use of 
technology and related considerations to aeronautical operations that 
impact the future Air Traffic Management System. RTCA provides the 
following two categories of recommendations to the FAA: Broad gauged 
policy and investment priority recommendations used by FAA when 
considering policy and program decisions; and minimum performance 
standards, reports, and guidance documents used by the FAA in 
regulatory decisions and rulemaking. Government regulatory and 
procurement practices reference or use RTCA standards (with or without 
change). The Secretary of Transportation has determined that that 
information and use of committee are necessary in the public interest 
in connection with the performance of duties imposed on the FAA by law.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC, 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org or the FAA Business Operations 
Group, NextGen and Operations Planning, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., 
Washington, DC: telephone (202) 493-4409; fax (202) 267-5071.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Steering Committee and Special Committee 
meetings are open to the public and announced in the Federal Register, 
except as authorized by Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 15, 2011.
Kathy Hitt,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2011-6525 Filed 3-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of John H. Harland Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Timothy C. Tuff, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
             15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.


/s/ Timothy C. Tuff                               March 14, 2006
------------------------------                    ---------------------
Timothy C. Tuff                                   Date
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 1 

JAF AIRSERVICE 

Operating License 

EXHIBIT 2 

JAF AIRSERVICE 

Air Operator Certificate 

EXHIBIT 3 

JAF AIRSERVICE 

Insurance Certificates 















EXHIBIT 4

JAF AIRSERVICE 

Warsaw Agreement
#### § 38.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to implement Executive Order 13279, Executive Order 13559, and Executive Order 14015.

[89 FR 15713, Mar. 4, 2024]
EXHIBIT 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



              In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gridline Communications
Holdings Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Terry
Dillon, acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
         the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company
         as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of
         the Company for the periods presented.



Date: November 21, 2005             /s/ Terry Dillon
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                    Terry Dillon
                                    Acting Chief Financial Officer of Gridline
                                    Communication Holdings Inc.

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Gridline Communications Holding Inc. and will be retained by
Gridline Communications Holdings Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 83.610 Controlled substance.

*Controlled substance* means a controlled substance in schedules I through V of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812), and as further defined by regulation at 21 CFR 1308.11 through 1308.15.
#### William H. Babby v. John B. Musser.

Filed March 19, 1902.

No. 11,387.

1. Forcible Entry and Detention: Appeal. In 1899 there was no valid statute authorizing an appeal to the district court in actions of forcible entry and detention, or forcible detention only, of real property.

2. Derivative Jurisdiction: Consent of Parties. The jurisdiction of the district court in such actions, being derivative only, is not aided by consent of parties.

Error from the district court for Sheridan county. Tried below before Kinkaid, J.

*Reversed.*

*Frank J. Kelley*and *J. H. Edmonds,*for plaintiff in error.

*O. Patterson, contra.*

Sullivan, C. J.

This was an action of forcible detainer. It was commenced in the county court of Sheridan county, and was tried and decided on April 4, 1899. The judgment was in favor of the plaintiff, John B. Musser. The defendant, William H. Babby, attempted to remove the cause by appeal to the district court. Both parties assumed that the appeal was valid, and the defendant, without challenging the jurisdiction of the court, entered a voluntary appearance, and participated in a trial which resulted in the judgment of which he is now complaining. The decision of the district court can not be approved. At the time of the trial in the county court, there was no valid statute authorizing an appeal in this class of cases. The statute which professed to give that right was not adopted in accordance with constitutional procedure, and in *Armstrong v. Mayer,*60 Nebr., 423, was held to be void. The appeal was therefore a nullity; it did not vacate the judgment of the county court, and that judgment has always been, and *176is now, in full force and effect. The case in the district court was, in substance, a new action. Jurisdiction of the parties was acquired by their voluntary appearance; but original jurisdiction of the subject-matter was not given by law, and hence the judgment rendered by the court and brought here for review was, and is, absolutely void.

Note.—The principle underlying the question of jurisdiction by consent is, that one may waive a personal privtheg-e in all eases where public policy is not contravened thereby. Wells, Jurisdiction of Courts, sec. 86. On an appeal from the judgment of a justice of the peace, the appellate court acquires no jurisdiction if the subject of the action was beyond the jurisdiction of the justice. *Coohan v.*Bryant, 36 Wis., 606, 612.—Reporter.

The decision is reversed and the action dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.
#### § 83.670 Suspension.

*Suspension* means an action taken by a Federal agency that immediately prohibits a recipient from participating in Federal Government procurement contracts and covered nonprocurement transactions for a temporary period, pending completion of an investigation and any judicial or administrative proceedings that may ensue. A recipient so prohibited is suspended, in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation for procurement contracts (48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4) and the common rule, Government-wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement), that implements Executive Order 12549 and Executive Order 12689. Suspension of a recipient is a distinct and separate action from suspension of an award or suspension of payments under an award.