alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 540.14 General correspondence. ( a ) Institution staff shall open and inspect all incoming general correspondence. Incoming general correspondence may be read as frequently as deemed necessary to maintain security or monitor a particular problem confronting an inmate.
( b ) Except for “special mail,” outgoing mail from a pretrial inmate may not be sealed by the inmate and may be read and inspected by staff.
( c ) ( 1 ) Outgoing mail from a sentenced inmate in a minimum or low security level institution may be sealed by the inmate and, except as provided for in paragraphs (c)(1)(i) through (iv) of this section, is sent out unopened and uninspected. Staff may open a sentenced inmate's outgoing general correspondence: ( i ) If there is reason to believe it would interfere with the orderly running of the institution, that it would be threatening to the recipient, or that it would facilitate criminal activity;
( ii ) If the inmate is on a restricted correspondence list;
( iii ) If the correspondence is between inmates (see § 540.17); or
( iv ) If the envelope has an incomplete return address.
( 2 ) Except for “special mail,” outgoing mail from a sentenced inmate in a medium or high security level institution, or an administrative institution may not be sealed by the inmate and may be read and inspected by staff.
( d ) The Warden may reject correspondence sent by or to an imate if it is determined detrimental to the security, good order, or discipline of the institution, to the protection of the public, or if it might facilitate criminal activity. Correspondence which may be rejected by a Warden includes, but is not limited to, correspondence which contains any of the following: ( 1 ) Matter which is nonmailable under law or postal regulations;
( 2 ) Matter which depicts, describes, or encourages activities which may lead to the use of physical violence or group disruption;
( 3 ) Information of escape plots, of plans to commit illegal activities, or to violate Bureau rules or institution guidelines;
( 4 ) Direction of an inmate's business (See § 541.13, Prohibited Act No. 408). An inmate, unless a pre-trial detainee, may not direct a business while confined. This does not, however, prohibit correspondence necessary to enable an inmate to protect property and funds that were legitimately the inmate's at the time of commitment. Thus, for example, an inmate may correspond about refinancing an existing mortgage or sign insurance papers, but may not operate a mortgage or insurance business while in the institution.
( 5 ) Threats, extortion, obscenity, or gratuitous profanity;
( 6 ) A code;
( 7 ) Sexually explicit material (for example, personal photographs) which by its nature or content poses a threat to an individual's personal safety or security, or to institution good order; or
( 8 ) Contraband. (See § 500.1 of this chapter. A package received without prior authorization by the Warden is considered to be contraband.)
[50 FR 40109, Oct. 1, 1985, as amended at 56 FR 4159, Feb. 1, 1991; 62 FR 65186, Dec. 10, 1997]
146


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.17

                              NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE

APPLICANT: Fu- Lin, ZHOU

The application submitted on August 20, 1995 to obtain patent of invention named
'LINER RUBBER ABSORBER CUSHION' satisfies requirements of patent application.
According to section twenty-eight of the Patent Act and section thirty-nine in
Details and Regulations of the Patent Act, this application has been accepted.
The application number and application date are assigned as followings :



APPLICATION NUMBER :          95 2 20019.8
APPLICATION DATE   :          950820

FEE : 1 - 80% Reduced


Explanation in Brief:

This notice is a proof indicating that the Department of Patent of China has
accepted the applicant's application for a patent.

The Application number is the file number assigned by the Department of Patent
of China. Nine digits or characters compose the application number. The third
digit counting from the left represents the type of the application. Digit "1"
stands for invention; Digit "2" stands for practical new model type; Digit
"3"stands for apparent design. If the applicant finds that the application
number does not correctly stands for his/her application type, he/she should ask
the Department of Patent to make correction within 15 days from the date when
this notice is received by the applicant.

According to the twenty-eighth regulation stated in the Patent Act, if the
application is submitted by mail, the date of the postmark on the application
documents is assigned as the application date. If the applicant finds the
application date assigned different from the mailing date, he/ she can ask the
Department of Patent to change the application date provided with proof of the
mail register within one month from the date when this notice is received by the
applicant.

This notice has very important instructions printed on the back. It is the
applicants' responsibilities to read those instructions carefully.
#### § 513.67 Fees for Freedom of Information Act requests.

Fees for copies of records disclosed under the FOIA, including fees for a requester's own records, may be charged in accordance with Department of Justice regulations contained in 28 CFR 16.10.
cc: Hon. Doug Smith, District Judge 

Donald M. Savage 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2
#### § 12.20 Filing of registration statement.

Registration statements shall be filed in duplicate with the National Security Division, Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530. Filing may be made in person or by mail, and shall be deemed to have taken place upon the receipt thereof by the Division.

[Order No. 2865-2007, 72 FR 10068, Mar. 7, 2007]
#### §§ 36.312-36.399 [Reserved]
#### In the Matter of Samuel Friedman, as President of the New York Local Joint Board of the Hotel and Restaurant Employees International Alliance and Bartenders International League of America, et al., Appellants, against Lewis J. Valentine, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, Respondent.

First Department,

July 2, 1943.

*562
      *Louis B. Boudin*of counsel *(Boudin, Cohn & Glickstein,*attorneys), for appellants.

*Paxton Blair*of counsel *(Charles C. Weinstein*and *Bernard Priedlcmder*with him on the brief; *Robert H. Schaffer, Acting Corporation*Counsel), for respondent.

Order affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.

Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore and Cohn, JJ., concur; Callahan, J., concurs in opinion.

Callahan, J.

(concurring). This case differs from *Acorn Employment Service, Inc.,*v. *Moss*(266 App. Div. 829), in that here, in addition to the power granted by section 885 of the New York City Charter (1938) permitting the Commissioner to make rules for the conduct of his own office, he is granted express power to make such rules and regulations for the supervision and operation of the businesses under his jurisdiction as are not inconsistent with any other provisions of law (New York City Charter [1938], § 436).

Reading all the applicable statutes together, including those defining the duties of the Police Commissioner there appears *563to be a sufficient standard supplied concerning the rule-making power.

The regulations adopted (as amended) seem reasonable. Though the right retained in rule 5 of the Regulations Groverning Cabarets to revoke an identification card is broad and without any express limitation, I think there is an implied limitation that the administrative act may only be for good cause shown. There is right to judicial review (Civ. Prac. Act, art. 78). Accordingly, there is no unconstitutional interference with the fundamental right to work.'

The order should be affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements.
###### Editorial Note on Part 0

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

#### § 0.177 Applications for orders under the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act.

Notwithstanding the delegation of functions contained in subpart R of this part, the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Criminal Division is authorized to exercise the authority vested in the Attorney General by section 514 of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, 84 Stat. 1276, to approve the application of a U.S. Attorney to a Federal court for an order compelling testimony or the production of information in any proceeding before a court or grand jury of the United States. Immunity shall be granted in agency proceedings under that Act only with the concurrence of the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Criminal Division.

[Order No. 445-70, 35 FR 19397, Dec. 23, 1970]
Exhibit 10(i)(i)
                                                                ----------------

                   SIXTH AMENDMENT TO STOCKHOLDERS' AGREEMENT
                   ------------------------------------------

         THIS SIXTH AMENDMENT TO STOCKHOLDERS' AGREEMENT is entered into this
12th day of December, 2000, by and between CHARLES A. HAYES ("Hayes") and
GUILFORD MILLS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Company").

                                   WITNESSETH:
                                   -----------

         WHEREAS, Hayes and the Company are parties to a Stockholders'
Agreement, dated April 30, 1991, as amended, pursuant to the current terms of
which the Company is required to purchase, upon the death of Hayes, such number
of shares of Company common stock beneficially owned by him as equals $5,000,000
(the "1991 Stockholders' Agreement); and

         WHEREAS, the Company has recently entered into amendments to certain
loan agreements which limit the amount of Company common stock which it can
purchase upon the death of Hayes; and

         WHEREAS, given the limitations imposed by such amended loan agreements,
Hayes and the Company desire to amend the 1991 Stockholders' Agreement as more
fully set forth below.

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions
contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as
follows:

         1. The first sentence of Section 1 of the 1991 Stockholders' Agreement
is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following sentence is inserted in its
place:

                           Upon the death of Hayes, Guilford agrees to purchase
         from his estate (the "Estate"), such number of shares of Common Stock
         owned by Hayes as of the date of his death (the "Deceased Stockholder's
         Common Shares") having an aggregate purchase price determined in
         accordance with paragraph 2 hereof equal to $2,900,000.

         2. Except as otherwise expressly set forth above, the 1991
Stockholders' Agreement remains unmodified and in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Sixth Amendment as
of the day and year first above written.



                      [SIGNATURES APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGE]


<PAGE>


GUILFORD MILLS, INC.

By: /s/ John A. Emrich                      /s/ Charles A. Hayes
    ------------------                      --------------------
Name:  John A. Emrich                       Charles A. Hayes
Title:  President/Chief Executive Officer











                                       2
§ 54.445 Marital or parental status. ( a ) *Status generally.* A recipient shall not apply any rule concerning a student's actual or potential parental, family, or marital status that treats students differently on the basis of sex.
( b ) *Pregnancy and related conditions.* ( 1 ) A recipient shall not discriminate against any student, or exclude any student from its education program or activity, including any class or extracurricular activity, on the basis of such student's pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, or recovery therefrom, unless the student requests voluntarily to participate in a separate portion of the program or activity of the recipient.
( 2 ) A recipient may require such a student to obtain the certification of a physician that the student is physically and emotionally able to continue participation as long as such a certification is required of all students for other physical or emotional conditions requiring the attention of a physician.
( 3 ) A recipient that operates a portion of its education program or activity separately for pregnant students, admittance to which is completely voluntary on the part of the student as provided in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, shall ensure that the separate portion is comparable to that offered to non-pregnant students.
( 4 ) Subject to § 54.235(d), a recipient shall treat pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy and recovery therefrom in the same manner and under the same policies as any other temporary disability with respect to any medical or hospital benefit, service, plan, or policy that such recipient administers, operates, offers, or participates in with respect to students admitted to the recipient's educational program or activity.
( 5 ) In the case of a recipient that does not maintain a leave policy for its students, or in the case of a student who does not otherwise qualify for leave under such a policy, a recipient shall treat pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, and recovery therefrom as a justification for a leave of absence for as long a period of time as is deemed medically necessary by the student's physician, at the conclusion of which the student shall be reinstated to the status that she held when the leave began.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C.     20549

FORM 8-K/A

CURRENT REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of Report(Date of Earliest Event
Reported): April 28, 2000

FDN, INC. FORMERLY DOING
BUSINESS
As "MERCURY CAPITAL CORP."

COLORADO            0-25519           84-0644739

(State or other  (Commission File    IRS Employer
jurisdiction of	     Number)  		       I.D. No.)
incorporation)

2290 Lee Rd.
Winter Park, FL 				             32789
(Address of principal     		   (Zip Code)
executive offices)

(407) 702.2000
Registrant's telephone number, including
area code:

Mercury Capital Corporation
5770 South Beech Ct.
Greenwood Village, CO 80121
(303) 221. 7376
(Former name, address and telephone number)

<PAGE>

ITEM 7.   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, PRO FORMA INFORMATION
AND EXHIBITS

A.	Financial Statements of Business Acquired

The financial statements of FDN, Inc.
as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and for the two years
then ended, together with the audit report of Lazar
Levine & Felix LLP dated April 17, 2000 is attached
as Exhibit A.

B. Pro Forma Financial Information

Pro forma financial schedules are attached hereto as Exhibit B.

<PAGE>

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
hereunto duly authorized.

/s/ Colin Cave /s/
Colin Cave
Chief Financial Officer
Date: April 28, 2000

<PAGE>
### §410aaa–1. Establishment

There is hereby established the Death Valley National Park (hereinafter in this part referred to as the "park") as generally depicted on twenty-three maps entitled "Death Valley National Park Boundary and Wilderness—Proposed", numbered in the title one through twenty-three, and dated July 1993 or prior, which shall be on file and available for public inspection in the offices of the Superintendent of the park and the Director of the National Park Service, Department of the Interior. The Death Valley National Monument is hereby abolished as such, the lands and interests therein are hereby incorporated within and made part of the new Death Valley National Park, and any funds available for purposes of the monument shall be available for purposes of the park.

(Pub. L. 103–433, title III, §302, Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4485.)
IN THE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS Sitting at Houston, TX

NO. 01

- 15

- 00275

- CR

WALTER BALLARD , Appellant,

Versus
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. Appeal from the 183 rd Judicial District Court

Harris County, Texas

- Cause No. 1390115

Honorable Vanessa Velasquez Presiding

APPELLANT’S SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS: MAVERICK J. RAY, undersigned counsel for Appellant, respectfully

moves for an extension of time to file Appellant's Opening Brief and for cause

wo uld show as follows:

1. Appellant was convicted of Possession of a Child Pornography in Cause No. 13 90115

. 2. Timely notice of appeal was given.

3. The time for filing Appellant's brief expired on August 28, 2015

. The failure
to seek an extension prior to that time was not intentional or deliberate

.
4. Counsel has had six jury trials set which has caused counsel to spend extra ACCEPTED 01-15-00275-CR FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/2/2015 6:30:19 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERKtime prepping for trial and has not allowed significant time to fi nish the brief

in this case

. Further, Appellant has moved around between five different
facilities since his incarceration in March of this year and numerous

communications , documents, and writings concerning Appellant ’ s brief sent

back and forth between counsel and Ap pellant have failed to reach its proper

destination causing certain issues to not be ready to submit for review.

5. Granting leave to file a nd extending the time for filing the Appellant's
Opening Brief will work no prejudice to the State of Texas in the preparation
and filing of the Appellee's Brief

6. This request is being made not for the purpose of delay but that justice may

be done and that Appellant may realize his right to appeal.

7. Appellant is requesting an extension of at least two months.
For all of the reasons set forth above. Appellant requests and pays this Court
to enter an order granting an extension for the time to file Appellant's Opening

Brief.
Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Maverick J. Ray

MAVERICK RAY 1419 Franklin ST. Houston, Texas 77002 Telephone: (281) 947

- 2007 Facsimile: (713) 714

- 2225 SBN: 24080451CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Undersigned counsel certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing Motion for Extension o f time to file Brief has been this day placed in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the office of the Harris County District Attorney's office, appellate division, 1201 Franklin, Ste

. 600, Houston, Texas 77002.



### /s/ Maverick J. Ray MAVERICK J. RAY
#### § 571.10 Purpose and scope.

The Bureau of Prisons recognizes that an inmate's preparation for release begins at initial commitment and continues throughout incarceration and until final release to the community. This subpart establishes a standardized release preparation program for all sentenced inmates reintegrating into the community from Bureau facilities. Exception to this subpart may be made by the Warden of a Bureau facility which has been designated as an administrative maximum security institution.

[61 FR 38043, July 22, 1996]
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001.

      --------------------------------------------------------------------


In connection with the Quarterly Report of OSK CAPITAL II CORP.(the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George
Metrakos , Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2001, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 17, 2006

                                    /s/ George Metrakos
                                    -----------------------
                                    George Metrakos ,
                                    Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            9

       
<S>                                                  <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                         DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                              0
<ALLOWANCE>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                  0
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                       0
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                      0
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                     0
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                                0
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        


<FN>

At December 31, 1998, Gouverneur Bancorp, Inc. was a shell corporation with no
business activities or operations and no assets.
</FN>



</TABLE>
#### § 524.43 Inmate's access to progress reports.

Upon request, an inmate may read and receive a copy of any progress report retained in the inmate's central file which had been prepared on that inmate after October 15, 1974. Staff shall allow the inmate the opportunity to read a newly prepared progress report and shall request the inmate sign and date the report. If the inmate refuses to do so, staff witnessing the refusal shall document this refusal on the report. Staff shall then offer to provide a copy of the progress report to the inmate.

[59 FR 6857, Feb. 11, 1994]