Augustus C. Epps, Jr., Esquire (VSB No. 13254)

Jennifer M. McLemore, Esquire (VSB No. 47164)

Margaret X. Yang, Esquire (VSB No. 88596)

CHRISTIAN & BARTON, LLP

909 East Main Street, Suite 1200

Richmond, Virginia 23219-3095

Telephone: (804) 697-4100

Facsimile: (804) 697-6112

Jeffrey R. Waxman, Esquire

Eric J. Monzo, Esquire

MORRIS JAMES LLP

500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1500

Wilmington, Delaware 19801

Telephone: (302) 888-6800

Facsimile: (302) 571-1750

Proposed Counsel to Debtors and Debtors-in-Possession

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

RICHMOND DIVISION

__________________________________________

In re: )

) Chapter 11

Morris | Schneider | Wittstadt Va., PLLC, a )

Virginia professional limited liability company, ) Case No. 15-33370

)

)

Debtor. )

In re: )

) Chapter 11

Morris | Schneider | Wittstadt, PLLC, a West )

Virginia professional limited liability company, ) Case No. 15-33371

)

Debtor. )

In re: )

) Chapter 11

Wittstadt Title & Escrow Company, L.L.C., a )

Virginia limited liability company, ) Case No. 15-12323

)

Debtor. )

In re: )

) Chapter 11

MORRIS | SCHNEIDER | WITTSTADT, )

LLC, a Georgia limited liability company, ) Case No. 15-33372

)

Debtor. )

In re: )

) Chapter 11

MSWLAW, Inc., a Georgia corporation, )

) Case No. 15-33373

Debtor. )

Case 15-33374 Doc 3 Filed 07/06/15 Entered 07/06/15 00:12:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 12
2

In re: )

) Chapter 11

Teays Valley Trustees, LLC, West Virginia )

limited liability company, ) Case No. 15-33374

)

Debtor. )

In re: )

) Chapter 11

York Trustees Services, LLC, a Tennessee )

limited liability company, ) Case No. 15-33375

)

Debtor. )

MOTION OF THE DEBTORS AND DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION

FOR AN ORDER DIRECTING JOINT ADMINISTRATION

OF THEIR RELATED CHAPTER 11 CASES

The above-captioned debtors and debtors-in-possession (collectively, the “Debtors”),1 by 

their undersigned counsel, file this motion (the “Motion”) for entry of an order, the proposed 

form of which is attached hereto, pursuant to section 105 of Title 11 of the United States Code, 

11 U.S.C. §§ 101–1532 (as amended, the “Bankruptcy Code”), Rule 1015(b) of the Federal 

Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the “Bankruptcy Rules”) and Rule 1015-1 of the Local Rules of 

Bankruptcy Practice and Procedure of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia (the “Local Rules”), directing the joint administration of their related chapter 

11 cases. In support of this Motion, the Debtors rely on the Declaration of Mark Wittstadt in 

support of the Debtors’ Chapter 11 Petitions and First Day Pleadings (the “Wittstadt 

Declaration”). In further support of this Motion, the Debtors submit as follows: 

 

1

The employer tax identification numbers and addresses for each of the Debtors are set forth in their 

respective chapter 11 petitions. 

Case 15-33374 Doc 3 Filed 07/06/15 Entered 07/06/15 00:12:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 12
3

JURISDICTION, VENUE AND PREDICATES FOR RELIEF

1. The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 

1334(b). Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409. This matter is a core 

proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. §157 (b)(2). 

2. The predicates for the relief requested herein are section 105(a) of the Bankruptcy 

Code, Bankruptcy Rule 1015(b) and Local Rule 1015-1. 

BACKGROUND

3. Substantially contemporaneously herewith, each of the Debtors filed with the 

Court a voluntary petition for relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, commencing the 

above-captioned chapter 11 cases. The Debtors continue to operate their businesses and manage 

their properties as debtors-in-possession pursuant to sections 1107(a) and 1108 of the 

Bankruptcy Code. 

4. No creditors’ committee has been appointed in these cases, and no trustee or 

examiner has been appointed. 

5. A full description of the Debtors’ business operations, corporate structures, capital 

structures, and reasons for commencing these cases is set forth in full in the Wittstadt 

Declaration, which was filed substantially contemporaneously with this Motion and which is 

incorporated herein by reference. Additional facts in support of the specific relief sought herein 

are set forth below. 

RELIEF REQUESTED

6. By this Motion, the Debtors seek entry of an order directing joint administration 

of these chapter 11 cases for procedural purposes only. 

Case 15-33374 Doc 3 Filed 07/06/15 Entered 07/06/15 00:12:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 12
4

7. Specifically, the Debtors request that the Court maintain one file and one docket 

for all of the jointly administered cases under the case of Morris | Schneider |Wittstadt Va., 

PLLC, and that the cases be administered under a consolidated caption, as follows: 

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

RICHMOND DIVISION

__________________________________________

In re: )

) Chapter 11

Morris | Schneider | Wittstadt Va., PLLC, a )

Virginia professional limited liability ) Case No. 15-33370

company, et al., )

) (Jointly Administered)

Debtors.

2

)

8. The Debtors also request that the following docket entry be entered on the docket 

in each of the Debtors’ cases, other than the case of Morris |Schneider | Wittstadt Va., PLLC, to 

reflect the joint administration of these chapter 11 cases: 

An Order has been entered in this case in accordance with Rule 1015(b) of 

the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rule 1015-1 of the Local 

Bankruptcy Rules of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia directing the procedural consolidation and joint 

administration of the Chapter 11 cases of Morris | Schneider | Wittstadt 

Va., PLLC, Morris | Schneider | Wittstadt, PLLC, Wittstadt Title & 

Escrow Company, L.L.C., Morris | Schneider | Wittstadt, LLC, 

MSWLAW, Inc., Teays Valley Trustees, LLC, and York Trustee Services, 

LLC. The docket in Case No. 15-33370 should be consulted for all 

matters affecting this case.

9. Finally, the Debtors seek authority to file the monthly operating reports required 

by the “Operating Guidelines and Financial Reporting Requirements” of the United States 

Trustee (the “UST”) on a consolidated basis. 

 

2 The Debtors in these cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification 

number, are as follows: Morris | Schneider | Wittstadt Va., PLLC (1651), Morris | Schneider | Wittstadt, PLLC 

(1589), Wittstadt Title & Escrow Company, L.L.C. (3831), Morris | Schneider | Wittstadt, LLC (1589), MSWLAW, 

Inc. (6994), Teays Valley Trustees, LLC (9830), and York Trustee Services, LLC (8058). 

Case 15-33374 Doc 3 Filed 07/06/15 Entered 07/06/15 00:12:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 12
5

BASIS FOR RELIEF REQUESTED

10. Bankruptcy Rule 1015(b) provides, in relevant part, that if “two or more petitions 

are pending in the same court by or against . . . a debtor and an affiliate, the court may order a 

joint administration of the estates.” The Debtors are “affiliates” as that term is defined under 

section 101(2) of the Bankruptcy Code. Accordingly, this Court is authorized to grant the 

requested relief sought herein. 

11. Local Bankruptcy Rule 1015-1 further provides additional authority for the Court 

to order joint administration of these cases: 

In all joint petitions filed with the Court, the case will be administered 

through joint administration of the estates unless the trustee or other 

interested party files an objection to joint administration within 14 days 

after the meeting of creditors and gives notice of a hearing date on such 

objection. 

Local Bankr. R. 1015-1. 

12. Joint administration is generally non-controversial, and courts in this district and 

elsewhere routinely grant joint administration in related Chapter 11 cases. See, e.g., In re James 

River Coal Co., Case No. 14-31848 (KRH) (Bankr. E.D. Va. Apr. 10, 2014); In re AMF Bowling 

Worldwide, Inc., Case No. 12-36495 (KRH) (Bankr. E.D. Va. Nov. 14, 2012); In re Circuit City 

Stores, Inc., No. 08-35653 (KRH) (Bankr. E.D. Va. Nov. 10, 2008). 

13. Given the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and the Debtors’ affiliation, joint 

administration of these cases is warranted and will provide significant administrative 

convenience without harming the substantive rights of any party in interest. Joint administration 

will avoid the preparation, replication, service and filing, as applicable, of duplicative notices, 

applications and orders, thereby saving the Debtors considerable expense and resources. The 

Debtors’ financial affairs and business operations are closely related. The Debtors anticipate that 

Case 15-33374 Doc 3 Filed 07/06/15 Entered 07/06/15 00:12:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 12
6

the majority of the motions, hearings and orders in these Chapter 11 cases will all of the Debtors. 

Not only will the rights of creditors not be negatively affected, as this Motion requests only 

administrative, and not substantive, consolidation of the estates, but creditors will be able to find 

all pleadings in one centralized docket.

14. Moreover, each creditor can still file its claim against a particular estate. In fact, 

all creditors will benefit by the reduced costs that will result from the joint administration of 

these chapter 11 cases. The Court also will be relieved of the burden of entering duplicative 

orders and maintaining duplicative files. Finally, supervision of the administrative aspects of 

these chapter 11 cases by the United States Trustee for the Eastern District of Virginia will be 

simplified. 

15. Furthermore, it is appropriate to waive the requirement of section 342(c) (1) of the 

Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rules 1005 and 2002(n) to include the Debtors’ full tax 

identification numbers in the Debtors’ caption and notices sent to creditors. This information is 

available on all of the Debtors’ chapter 11 petitions. Waiver of this requirement is purely 

procedural in nature and will ease the administrative burden on the Debtors. 

NOTICE

16. The Debtors have served notice of this Motion on (a) the UST; (b) all known 

creditors holding secured claims against the Debtors’ estates; and (c) those creditors holding the 

30 largest unsecured claims against the Debtors’ estates on a consolidated basis. 

WAIVER OF MEMORANDUM OF LAW

17. The Debtors respectfully request that this Court treat this Motion as a written 

memorandum of points and authorities or waive any requirement that this Motion be 

Case 15-33374 Doc 3 Filed 07/06/15 Entered 07/06/15 00:12:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 12
7

accompanied by a written memorandum of points and authorities as described in Local 

Bankruptcy Rule 9013-1(G). 

NO PREVIOUS REQUEST

18. No previous request for the relief sought herein has been made by the Debtors to 

this or any other court. 

WHEREFORE, the Debtors respectfully request that the Court grant the relief requested 

herein and such other and further relief as is just and proper. 

DATED: July 6, 2015 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Jennifer M. McLemore

Augustus C. Epps, Jr., Esquire (VSB No. 13254)

Jennifer M. McLemore, Esquire (VSB No. 47164)

Margaret X. Yang, Esquire (VSB No. 88596)

CHRISTIAN & BARTON, LLP

909 East Main Street, Suite 1200

Richmond, Virginia 23219-3095

Telephone: (804) 697-4100

Facsimile: (804) 697-6112

-andJeffrey R. Waxman, Esquire (Pro Hac Vice Pending)

Eric J. Monzo, Esquire (Pro Hac Vice Pending)

MORRIS JAMES LLP

500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1500

Wilmington, Delaware 19801

Telephone: (302) 888-6800

Facsimile: (302) 571-1750

Proposed Counsel to the Debtors and 

Debtors-in-Possession 

Case 15-33374 Doc 3 Filed 07/06/15 Entered 07/06/15 00:12:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 12
Augustus C. Epps, Jr., Esquire (VSB No. 13254)

Jennifer M. McLemore, Esquire (VSB No. 47164)

Margaret X. Yang, Esquire (VSB No. 88596)

CHRISTIAN & BARTON, LLP

909 East Main Street, Suite 1200

Richmond, Virginia 23219-3095

Telephone: (804) 697-4100

Facsimile: (804) 697-6112

Jeffrey R. Waxman, Esquire

Eric J. Monzo, Esquire

MORRIS JAMES LLP

500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1500

Wilmington, Delaware 19801

Telephone: (302) 888-6800

Facsimile: (302) 571-1750

Proposed Counsel to Debtors and Debtors-in-Possession

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

RICHMOND DIVISION

__________________________________________

In re: )

) Chapter 11

Morris | Schneider | Wittstadt Va., PLLC, a )

Virginia professional limited liability company, ) Case No. 15-33370

)

)

Debtor. )

In re: )

) Chapter 11

Morris | Schneider | Wittstadt, PLLC, a West )

Virginia professional limited liability company, ) Case No. 15-33371

)

Debtor. )

In re: )

) Chapter 11

Wittstadt Title & Escrow Company, L.L.C., a )

Virginia limited liability company, ) Case No. 15-12323

)

Debtor. )

In re: )

) Chapter 11

MORRIS | SCHNEIDER | WITTSTADT, )

LLC, a Georgia limited liability company, ) Case No. 15-33372

)

Debtor. )

In re: )

) Chapter 11

MSWLAW, Inc., a Georgia corporation, )

) Case No. 15-33373

Debtor. )

Case 15-33374 Doc 3 Filed 07/06/15 Entered 07/06/15 00:12:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 12
2

In re: )

) Chapter 11

Teays Valley Trustees, LLC, a West Virginia )

limited liability company, ) Case No. 15-33374

)

Debtor. )

In re: )

) Chapter 11

York Trustee Services, LLC, a Tennessee limited )

liability company, ) Case No. 15-33375

)

Debtor. )

ORDER DIRECTING

JOINT ADMINISTRATION OF CHAPTER 11 CASES

Upon the motion (the “Motion”)1of the above-captioned debtors and debtors-inpossession (collectively, the “Debtors”) for entry of an order directing the joint administration of 

the Debtors’ related chapter 11 cases, the Court finds that (i) it has jurisdiction over the matters 

raised in the Motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334(b); (ii) this is a core proceeding 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2); (iii) venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1408 and 1409; 

(iv) the relief requested in the Motion is in the best interest of the Debtors, their estates and 

creditors; (v) proper and adequate notice of the Motion and the hearing thereon has been given 

and no other or further notice is necessary; (vi) after notice and an opportunity for hearing and

upon the record herein after due deliberation thereon, and the Court finding that good and 

sufficient cause exists for the granting of the relief as set forth herein, IT IS HEREBY: 

ORDERED THAT the relief requested in the Motion is hereby granted; and it is further

ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 1015(b) and Local Bankruptcy Rule 

1015-1, the above-captioned chapter 11 cases are consolidated for procedural purposes only and 

shall be jointly administered by the Court under Case No. 15-33370; and it is further

 

1 Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Motion.

Case 15-33374 Doc 3 Filed 07/06/15 Entered 07/06/15 00:12:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 12
3

ORDERED THAT nothing contained in this Order shall be deemed or construed as 

directing or otherwise affecting the substantive consolidation of any of the above-captioned 

cases; and it is further

ORDERED THAT the caption of the jointly administered cases shall read as follows:

__________________________________________

In re: )

) Chapter 11

Morris | Schneider | Wittstadt Va., PLLC, a )

Virginia professional limited liability ) Case No. 15-33370

company, et al., )

) (Jointly Administered)

Debtors.

1

)

and it is further

ORDERED THAT the requirement to include the Debtors’ full tax identification 

numbers in the case caption and notices to creditors is hereby waived; and it is further

ORDERED THAT the following docket entry shall be entered on the docket in each of 

the Debtors’ cases, other than the case of Morris | Schneider | Wittstadt Va., PLLC, to reflect the 

joint administration of these chapter 11 cases: 

An Order has been entered in this case in accordance with Rule 1015(b) of 

the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rule 1015-1 of the Local 

Rules of Bankruptcy Practice and Procedure of the United States 

Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia directing the 

procedural consolidation and joint administration of the Chapter 11 cases 

of Morris | Schneider | Wittstadt Va., PLLC, Morris | Schneider |

Wittstadt, PLLC, Wittstadt Title & Escrow Company, L.L.C., Morris |

Schneider | Wittstadt, LLC, MSWLAW, Inc., Teays Valley Trustees, 

LLC, and York Trustee Services, LLC. The docket in Case No. 15-33370

should be consulted for all matters affecting this case.

----------------

1 The Debtors in these cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification 

number, are: Morris | Schneider | Wittstadt Va., PLLC (1651), Morris | Schneider | Wittstadt, PLLC (1589), 

Wittstadt Title & Escrow Company, L.L.C. (3831), Morris | Schneider | Wittstadt, LLC (1589), MSWLAW, Inc. 

(6994), Teays Valley Trustees, LLC (9830), and York Trustee Services, LLC (8058).

Case 15-33374 Doc 3 Filed 07/06/15 Entered 07/06/15 00:12:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 12
4

and it is further

ORDERED THAT the Debtors may file their monthly operating reports required by the 

Operating Guidelines and Reporting Requirements for Debtors in Possession and Trustees, 

issued by the U.S. Trustee, on a consolidated basis; and it is further

ORDERED THAT notice of the Motion as provided therein shall be deemed to good 

and sufficient notice of such Motion; and it is further

ORDERED THAT the Debtors are authorized and empowered to take all actions 

necessary to implement the relief granted in this Order; and it is further

ORDERED THAT notwithstanding any Bankruptcy Rule or Local Bankruptcy Rule that 

might otherwise delay the effectiveness of this Order, the terms and conditions of this Order shall 

be immediately effective and enforceable upon its entry; and it is further

ORDERED THAT the requirement under Local Bankruptcy Rule 9013-1(G) to file a 

memorandum of law in connection with the Motion is hereby waived; and it is further

ORDERED THAT this Court shall retain jurisdiction over any and all matters arising 

from or related to the implementation or interpretation of this Order. 

Dated: This ______ day of ______________, 2015 

______________________________________

United States Bankruptcy Judge

Case 15-33374 Doc 3 Filed 07/06/15 Entered 07/06/15 00:12:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 11 of 12
5

WE ASK FOR THIS: 

Augustus C. Epps, Jr., Esquire (VSB No. 13254)

Jennifer M. McLemore, Esquire (VSB No. 47164)

Margaret X. Yang, Esquire (VSB No. 88596)

CHRISTIAN & BARTON, LLP

909 East Main Street, Suite 1200

Richmond, Virginia 23219-3095

Telephone: (804) 697-4100

Facsimile: (804) 697-6112

-andJeffrey R. Waxman, Esquire (Pro Hac Vice Pending)

Eric J. Monzo, Esquire (Pro Hac Vice Pending)

MORRIS JAMES LLP

500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1500

Wilmington, Delaware 19801

Telephone: (302) 888-6800

Facsimile: (302) 571-1750

Proposed Counsel to the 

and Debtors-in-Possession 

CERTIFICATION OF ENDORSEMENT

UNDER LOCAL BANKRUPTCY RULE 9022-1(C)

I hereby certify that the foregoing proposed order has been endorsed by or served upon 

all necessary parties. 

Case 15-33374 Doc 3 Filed 07/06/15 Entered 07/06/15 00:12:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 12 of 12