No. 14-14-00927-CV
In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals at Houston, Texas

ULRIKA BJORKSTAM AND JOSEPH DANIEL DRAY, Appellants,

v. WOODWARD, INC., Appellee. On Appeal from the 190 th Judicial District Court Of Harris County, Texas Trial Cause No. 2010-31214 The Honorable Patricia J. Kerrigan, Presiding SECOND UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANTS’ BRIEF Ulirka Bjorkstam and Joseph Daniel Dray file their Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellants’ Brief, pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b). 1. Presently, Appellants’ Br ief is due March 2, 2015. 2. Through this Unopposed Motion, Appellants seek an extension of twenty-one (21) days to file their Brief. Should the Court grant this Motion, the new deadline will be March 23, 2015. 3. Contemporaneously with this Motion, Appellants filed their Unopposed Motion to Supplement the Repor ter’s Record. Through that Motion, ACCEPTED 14-14-00927-cv FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/2/2015 3:19:43 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK2 Appellants seek to add the transcript of a hearing that occurred on May 17, 2013. There is a reference to the May 17 th hearing in the Reporter’s Record currently on file with the Court. The May 17 th hearing transcript is n ecessary for the complete presentation of Appellants’ arguments. The court reporter is ready to file the May
17 th hearing transcript, if the Court should grant Appellants’ Unopposed Motion to Supplement the Reporter’s Record. 4. Additionally, Appellants’ couns el argued before the Delaware Supreme Court on Febr uary 18, 2015 in Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. v. Andres Arteaga, et al., Case Number 333, 2014. As a resu lt, the first eighteen days of February were devoted to preparing for this argument, as well as getting acclimated to a new law firm. Moreove r, upon return from Delaware, where the weather was extremely cold, Appellants’ c ounsel fought cold and flu symptoms for several days. 5. Counsel for Woodward, Inc., has no objection to the requested extension of twenty-one (21) days. Ther efore, should the Court grant this Motion, the extension will not result in undue hardship or material harm to Woodward, Inc. 6. Appellants have prev iously sought a thirty-d ay extension from the
Court. For these reasons, Appellants request that the Court grant their Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Ti me to File Appellants’ Brief.3 Respectfully submitted, PIERCE & O’NEILL, LLP
/s/ John C. Schwambach, Jr. John C. Schwambach, Jr. Texas State Bar Number 17858450 4203 Montrose Boulevard Houston, Texas 77006 713-634-3607 Direct 713-634-3600 Main 713-634-3601 Facsimile jschwambach@pierceoneill.com Attorney for Appellants4 CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE I, John C. Schwambach, Jr., counsel for Appellants, Ulri ka Bjorkstam and Joseph Daniel Dray, hereby certify that I ha ve conferred with Timothy S. McConn, counsel for Appellee, about the merits of this Motion, and he is unopposed to this Motion.

/s/ John C. Schwambach, Jr. John C. Schwambach, Jr.5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Pursuant to the Texas Rules of Appe llate Procedure, I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was electronically filed and served upon all know counsel of record this 2 nd day of March, 2015.

/s/ John C. Schwambach, Jr. John C. Schwambach, Jr.