alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3830a. Repealed. Pub. L. 107–171, title I, §1613(j)(3), title II, §2006(c), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 221, 237

Section, Pub. L. 99–198, title XII, §1230A, as added Pub. L. 106–387, §1(a) [title VII, §755], Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1549, 1549A–42, related to good faith reliance.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT KEVAN BOYLES , Appellant,

v. JOSE IVAN JIMENEZ and CAROL ANN DYBDAL , Appellee s . No. 4D 22

- 1573 [ July 13, 2023 ] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Renatha S. Francis , Judge; L.T. Case No s . 50

- 2017

- CP

004460

- XXXX

- MB and 50

- 2018

- CA

- 000667

- XXXX

- MB
. Rosemary Cooney of Probate, Guardianship, & Trust, P.A., West Palm Beac h, for appellant. Peter Ticktin and Michael McCormick, Jr. of The Ticktin Law Group, Deerfield Beach, for appellees. P ER C URIAM . Affirmed. W ARNER , D AMOORGIAN and K UNTZ , JJ., concur. * * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 802.18 Correction or amendment of records. This section applies to all records kept by the Agency except for records of earnings. If you believe your record is not accurate, relevant, timely, or complete, you may request that your record be corrected or amended. A request for correction or amendment must identify the particular record in question, state the correction or amendment sought, and set forth the justification for the correction. To amend or correct your record, you should write to the Office of the General Counsel identified in § 802.14(a)(1). You should submit any available evidence to support your request. Both the request and the envelope must be clearly marked “Privacy Act Correction Request.” Your request should indicate: ( a ) The system of records from which the record is retrieved;
( b ) The particular record which you want to correct or amend;
( c ) Whether you want to add, delete or substitute information in the records; and
( d ) Your reasons for believing that your record should be corrected or amended.
§ 46.107 IRB membership. ( a ) Each IRB shall have at least five members, with varying backgrounds to promote complete and adequate review of research activities commonly conducted by the institution. The IRB shall be sufficiently qualified through the experience and expertise of its members, and the diversity of the members, including consideration of race, gender, and cultural backgrounds and sensitivity to such issues as community attitudes, to promote respect for its advice and counsel in safeguarding the rights and welfare of human subjects. In addition to possessing the professional competence necessary to review specific research activities, the IRB shall be able to ascertain the acceptability of proposed research in terms of institutional commitments and regulations, applicable law, and standards of professional conduct and practice. The IRB shall therefore include persons knowledgeable in these areas. If an IRB regularly reviews research that involves a vulnerable category of subjects, such as children, prisoners, pregnant women, or handicapped or mentally disabled persons, consideration shall be given to the inclusion of one or more individuals who are knowledgeable about and experienced in working with these subjects.
( b ) Every nondiscriminatory effort will be made to ensure that no IRB consists entirely of men or entirely of women, including the institution's consideration of qualified persons of both sexes, so long as no selection is made to the IRB on the basis of gender. No IRB may consist entirely of members of one profession.
( c ) Each IRB shall include at least one member whose primary concerns are in scientific areas and at least one member whose primary concerns are in nonscientific areas.
( d ) Each IRB shall include at least one member who is not otherwise affiliated with the institution and who is not part of the immediate family of a person who is affiliated with the institution.
( e ) No IRB may have a member participate in the IRB's initial or continuing review of any project in which the member has a conflicting interest, except to provide information requested by the IRB.
( f ) An IRB may, in its discretion, invite individuals with competence in special areas to assist in the review of issues which require expertise beyond or in addition to that available on the IRB. These individuals may not vote with the IRB.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RONGQING WANG,

Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 14-73409

Agency No. A201-207-106

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 14, 2016**

Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Rongqing Wang, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of 

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of 

removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 20 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-73409 

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the 

agency’s factual findings, Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 

2006), and we deny the petition for review.

We do not consider new evidence that was not part of the record before the 

agency. See Fisher v. INS, 79 F.3d 955, 963–64 (9th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

The record does not compel the conclusion that the mistreatment Wang

suffered in China, even if credible, rose to the level of past persecution. See Gu v. 

Gonzales, 454 F.3d 1014, 1019-21 (9th Cir. 2006); see also INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 

502 U.S. 478, 481 n.1 (1992) (“To reverse the BIA finding [the court] must find 

that the evidence not only supports that conclusion, but compels it”). Substantial 

evidence also supports the agency’s determination that Wang did not establish a 

well-founded fear of future persecution. See Gu, 454 F.3d at 1021-22. Thus, we 

deny the petition as to Wang’s asylum claim.

Because Wang did not establish eligibility for asylum, his withholding of 

removal claim necessarily fails. See Zehatye, 453 F.3d at 1190.

Finally, substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief 

because Wang failed to establish that he would more likely than not be tortured by 

or with the consent or acquiescence of a government official if returned to China. 
3 14-73409 

See Zheng v. Holder, 644 F.3d 829, 835–36 (9th Cir. 2011).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
## CAUTION FLIGHT OPERATIONS STAY BACK 150 FEET
### §1221. Congressional declaration of policy

Congress finds and declares that many estuaries in the United States are rich in a variety of natural, commercial, and other resources, including environmental natural beauty, and are of immediate and potential value to the present and future generations of Americans. It is therefore the purpose of this chapter to provide a means for considering the need to protect, conserve, and restore these estuaries in a manner that adequately and reasonably maintains a balance between the national need for such protection in the interest of conserving the natural resources and natural beauty of the Nation and the need to develop these estuaries to further the growth and development of the Nation. In connection with the exercise of jurisdiction over the estuaries of the Nation and in consequence of the benefits resulting to the public, it is declared to be the policy of Congress to recognize, preserve, and protect the responsibilities of the States in protecting, conserving, and restoring the estuaries in the United States.

(Pub. L. 90–454, §1, Aug. 3, 1968, 82 Stat. 625.)
### §460a–1. Acceptance of lands conveyed for Blue Ridge or Natchez Trace Parkways

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized, in his discretion, to approve and accept, on behalf of the United States, title to any lands and interests in land heretofore or hereafter conveyed to the United States for the purposes of the Blue Ridge or the Natchez Trace Parkways, or for recreational areas in connection therewith.

(June 30, 1936 ch. 883, §3, as added June 8, 1940, ch. 277, 54 Stat. 250.)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

May 11, 2021

In the Matter of

MJ Biotech, Inc. (f/k/a Michael James 

Enterprises, Inc.),

File No. 500-1

ORDER OF SUSPENSION OF

TRADING

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of MJ Biotech, Inc. (f/k/a 

Michael James Enterprises, Inc.) (“MJTV1”) (CIK No. 1543272), a good standing Wyoming

corporation located in Cheyenne, Wyoming with a class of securities registered with the 

Commission pursuant to Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") Section 12(g) 

because it is delinquent in its periodic filings with the Commission, having not filed any periodic 

reports since it filed a Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2018. On December 17, 

2020, the Commission’s Division of Corporation Finance (“Corporation Finance”) sent a 

delinquency letter to MJTV requesting compliance with its periodic filing requirements, which 

was delivered. As of April 1, 2021, the common stock of MJTV was quoted on OTC Link 

operated by OTC Markets Group Inc. (formerly “Pink Sheets”) (“OTC Link”), had six market 

makers, and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11(f)(3). 

 

1 The short form of each issuer’s name is also its stock symbol.
2

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors 

require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company. Therefore, it is 

ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the 

securities of the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on May 

12, 2021, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on May 25, 2021.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary
§ 571.61 Initiation of request—extraordinary or compelling circumstances. ( a ) A request for a motion under 18 U.S.C. 4205(g) or 3582(c)(1)(A) shall be submitted to the Warden. Ordinarily, the request shall be in writing, and submitted by the inmate. An inmate may initiate a request for consideration under 18 U.S.C. 4205(g) or 3582(c)(1)(A) only when there are particularly extraordinary or compelling circumstances which could not reasonably have been foreseen by the court at the time of sentencing. The inmate's request shall at a minimum contain the following information: ( 1 ) The extraordinary or compelling circumstances that the inmate believes warrant consideration.
( 2 ) Proposed release plans, including where the inmate will reside, how the inmate will support himself/herself, and, if the basis for the request involves the inmate's health, information on where the inmate will receive medical treatment, and how the inmate will pay for such treatment.
( b ) The Bureau of Prisons processes a request made by another person on behalf of an inmate in the same manner as an inmate's request. Staff shall refer a request received at the Central Office to the Warden of the institution where the inmate is confined.
[59 FR 1238, Jan. 7, 1994, as amended at 78 FR 13479, Feb. 28, 2013]
#### Harry Shaffer et al., Copartners Doing Business as Shaffer & Levin, et al., Appellants, v. Richard Gardens, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Present — Carswell, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 90846 / January 4, 2021

INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940

Release No. 5660 / January 4, 2021

INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940

Release No. 34162 / January 4, 2021

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-18061

IN THE MATTER OF

THOMAS ROSE, DAVID LEEMAN, and 

DAVID FEATHERSTONE

NOTICE THAT INITIAL DECISION HAS BECOME FINAL

The time for filing a petition for review of the initial decision in this proceeding has 

expired. No such petition has been filed by Thomas Rose, David Leeman, David Featherstone,

or the Division of Enforcement, and the Commission has not chosen to review the decision on its 

own initiative.

Accordingly, notice is hereby given, pursuant to Rule 360(d) of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice,1that the initial decision of the administrative law judge has become the final 

decision of the Commission with respect to Thomas Rose, David Leeman, and David 

Featherstone.

2 The orders contained in that decision are hereby declared effective. The initial 

decision ordered that: (a) pursuant to 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.322 and 201.630(c), pages 1505 to 1514 

of Respondents’ appendix and accompanying exhibits shall be maintained under seal; 

(b) pursuant to Section 8A(e) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 21B(e) and 21C(e) of 

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, David Featherstone shall disgorge $60,380, plus 

prejudgment interest; David Leeman shall disgorge $24,343.50, plus prejudgment interest; and 

Thomas Rose shall disgorge $297,360, plus prejudgment interest; (c) pursuant to Section 8A(g) 

of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21B(a)(1)-(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 

David Featherstone, David Leeman, and Thomas Rose shall each pay a civil money penalty in 

 

1

 17 C.F.R. § 201.360(d).

2

 Retirement Surety LLC, Crescendo Financial LLC, Thomas Rose, David Leeman, and David 

Featherstone, Initial Decision Release No. 1392, 2019 WL 7284955 (Dec. 20, 2019). 
2

the amount of $3,750; and (d) pursuant to 17 C.F.R. § 201.1100, any funds recovered by 

disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil penalties be placed in a fair fund for the benefit of 

investors harmed by the violations.

For the Commission, by the Office of the General Counsel, pursuant to delegated 

authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

 Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 44 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 44

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed retransfer of 
certain defense articles from the United Arab Emirates to the Hashemite 
                           Kingdom of Jordan.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the issuance of an export 
license with respect to the following proposed retransfer of defense 
articles from the United Arab Emirates to the Hashemite Kingdom of 
Jordan is prohibited:
            (1) The retransfer of the following defense articles, 
        including services and technical data, described in Executive 
        Communication 1428 (EC-1428) submitted to Congress pursuant to 
        section 3(d) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2753(d)) 
        and published in the Congressional Record on June 3, 2019: The 
        proposed retransfer of 500 Paveway II laser guided bombs 
        (including Mk-82 warheads, FMU-152A/B fuzes, and guidance kits) 
        from the United Arab Emirates to Jordan.

            Passed the Senate June 20, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. J. RES. 44

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed retransfer of 
certain defense articles from the United Arab Emirates to the Hashemite 
                           Kingdom of Jordan.
```
!"#

 $%&













	

	




	

%'(')*)'+$)(+,-''
.-/*

0/%)')'	,1234$5)(64(378+)9*'$9++:';

;),<8$$%&,)'$=(%)'*(8'*+')(99%)

')9*')(8'*'>()'$)($=)'<'+)9*8'*$)/>(

$=)'<0%)*'=/ ?8 @&8))$.

$$,),$)1*%.$-0/%)')'$/,'+

A@@,+$%(*+9+$	,123

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

C!'3,%(.:,*<

'*'(3BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

:';;),<8D!7? 

$;),<
2")/8


?$)'!)*<*8C,) @

;(
'8D @

4&@&7&

,'9+$%&,

Nov 29 2017 /s/ Brian F. Kenney

11/29/2017

Case 15-13962-BFK Doc 169 Filed 11/29/17 Entered 11/29/17 16:16:02 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 4
C#"C

EE:';;),<

:';;),<8F8DC!7? 

$;),<
2")/8


?$)'!)*<*8C,) @

;(
'8D)<)') @


$' 4&@&7&

Case 15-13962-BFK Doc 169 Filed 11/29/17 Entered 11/29/17 16:16:02 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 4

(9,9@ 4)+)()'

$.()+.$$+<)'<G%%*H*%%=)'<
./'+$-

/*0/%)')'	,123$''**.99'(.%)

EE:';;),<

:';;),<

Case 15-13962-BFK Doc 169 Filed 11/29/17 Entered 11/29/17 16:16:02 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 4


	
	


*'.
,9,'

 @$)'!)*<*

;(
'8D @

EE/'E*E($/'E*(%*+E99*(E I @& 7@  ?@&*(

Case 15-13962-BFK Doc 169 Filed 11/29/17 Entered 11/29/17 16:16:02 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 4
### §158. Administration, protection, and development

The administration, protection, and development of the Big Bend National Park shall be exercised under the direction of the Secretary of the Interior by the National Park Service, subject to the provisions of the Act of August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535), entitled "An Act to establish a National Park Service, and for other purposes",1 as amended: Provided, That the provisions of the Federal Power Act [16 U.S.C. 791a et seq.] shall not apply to this park.

(June 20, 1935, ch. 283, §3, 49 Stat. 394.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Act of August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535), entitled "An Act to establish a National Park Service, and for other purposes", referred to in text, is act Aug. 25, 1916, ch. 408, 39 Stat. 535, known as the National Park Service Organic Act, which enacted sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 of this title and provisions set out as a note under section 100101 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs. Sections 1 to 4 of the Act were repealed and restated as section 1865(a) of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and section 100101(a), chapter 1003, and sections 100751(a), 100752, 100753, and 102101 of Title 54 by Pub. L. 113–287, §§3, 4(a)(1), 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3094, 3260, 3272. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables. For disposition of former sections of this title, see Disposition Table preceding section 100101 of Title 54.

The Federal Power Act, referred to in text, was in the original the "Act of June 10, 1920, known as the Federal Water Power Act," and was redesignated as the Federal Power Act by section 791a of this title. The Federal Power Act is act June 10, 1920, ch. 285, 41 Stat. 1063, as amended, and is classified generally to chapter 12 (§791a et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 791a of this title and Tables.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

1 See References in Text note below.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 85918/ May 22, 2019

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-18210

In the Matter of 

ICON VAPOR, INC., 

POWRTEC INTERNATIONAL CORP., 

SILVERGRAPH INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

 and

WALTER ENERGY, INC. (N/K/A NEW 

 WEI, INC.)

NOTICE THAT INITIAL DECISION HAS BECOME FINAL

The time for filing a petition for review of the initial decision in this proceeding has 

expired. No such petition has been filed by Icon Vapor, Inc., POWRtec International Corp., 

Silvergraph International, Inc., or Walter Energy, Inc. (n/k/a New WEI, Inc.), and the 

Commission has not chosen to review the decision on its own initiative.

Accordingly, notice is hereby given, pursuant to Rule 360(d) of the Commission's Rules 

of Practice,1that the initial decision of the administrative law judge has become the final 

decision of the Commission with respect to Icon Vapor, Inc., POWRtec International Corp., 

Silvergraph International, Inc., and Walter Energy, Inc. (n/k/a New WEI, Inc.).

2

The order 

contained in that decision is hereby declared final. The initial decision ordered that, pursuant to 

Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrations of each class of registered 

 

1

 17 C.F.R. § 201.360(d).

2

 Icon Vapor, Inc., POWRtec Int’l Corp., Silvergraph Int’l, Inc., and Walter Energy, Inc. 

(n/k/a New WEI, Inc.), Initial Decision Release No. 1356 (Feb. 21, 2019), 2019 WL 762693.

The Central Index Key numbers are: 1563915 for Icon Vapor, Inc.; 1387673 for POWRtec 

International Corp.; 1115975 for Silvergraph International, Inc.; and 837173 for Walter Energy, 

Inc. (n/k/a New WEI, Inc.).
2

securities of Icon Vapor, Inc., POWRtec International Corp., Silvergraph International, Inc., and 

Walter Energy, Inc. (n/k/a New WEI, Inc.), are revoked. The revocations are effective as of May 

23, 2019.

For the Commission, by the Office of the General Counsel, pursuant to delegated 

authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

 Acting Secretary
### SUBCHAPTER XLVII—MAMMOTH CAVE NATIONAL PARK