alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 0
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

§ 0.29c Reporting allegations of employee misconduct. ( a ) *Reporting to the OIG.* Evidence and non-frivolous allegations of criminal wrongdoing or serious administrative misconduct by Department employees shall be reported to the OIG, or to a supervisor or a Department component's internal affairs office for referral to the OIG, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) *Reporting to the Department's Office of Professional Responsibility (DOJ-OPR).* Employees shall report to DOJ-OPR evidence and non-frivolous allegations of serious misconduct by Department attorneys that relate to the exercise of their authority to investigate, litigate, or provide legal advice. Employees shall also report to DOJ-OPR evidence and non-frivolous allegations of serious misconduct by Department law enforcement personnel that are related to allegations of misconduct by a Department attorney that relate to the exercise of the attorney's authority to investigate, litigate, or provide legal advice.
( c ) *Reporting to the Drug Enforcement Administration Office of Professional Responsibility (DEA-OPR).* Evidence and non-frivolous allegations of serious misconduct by employees of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) shall be reported by the OIG to the Drug Enforcement Administration Office of Professional Responsibility (DEA-OPR) or to the Deputy Attorney General.
( d ) *Reporting to the Federal Bureau of Investigation Office of Professional Responsibility (FBI-OPR).* Evidence and non-frivolous allegations of serious misconduct by employees of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) shall be reported by the OIG to the FBI-OPR except as provided in § 0.29d of this subpart, or to the Deputy Attorney General.
[Order No. 2167-98, 63 FR 36847, July 8, 1998, as amended by Order No. 2492-2001, 66 FR 37903, July 20, 2001]
§ 115.81 Medical and mental health screenings; history of sexual abuse. ( a ) If the screening pursuant to § 115.41 indicates that a prison inmate has experienced prior sexual victimization, whether it occurred in an institutional setting or in the community, staff shall ensure that the inmate is offered a follow-up meeting with a medical or mental health practitioner within 14 days of the intake screening.
( b ) If the screening pursuant to § 115.41 indicates that a prison inmate has previously perpetrated sexual abuse, whether it occurred in an institutional setting or in the community, staff shall ensure that the inmate is offered a follow-up meeting with a mental health practitioner within 14 days of the intake screening.
( c ) If the screening pursuant to § 115.41 indicates that a jail inmate has experienced prior sexual victimization, whether it occurred in an institutional setting or in the community, staff shall ensure that the inmate is offered a follow-up meeting with a medical or mental health practitioner within 14 days of the intake screening.
( d ) Any information related to sexual victimization or abusiveness that occurred in an institutional setting shall be strictly limited to medical and mental health practitioners and other staff, as necessary, to inform treatment plans and security and management decisions, including housing, bed, work, education, and program assignments, or as otherwise required by Federal, State, or local law.
( e ) Medical and mental health practitioners shall obtain informed consent from inmates before reporting information about prior sexual victimization that did not occur in an institutional setting, unless the inmate is under the age of 18.
S. Con. Res. 4 Agreed to February 14, 2019

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That, in the enrollment of the joint resolution H.J. Res. 

31, the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall amend the 

long title so as to read: ‘‘Making consolidated appropriations for 

the fiscal year ending September 30, 2019, and for other purposes.’’. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Quotemedia, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, R. Keith Guelpa, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ R. Keith Guelpa    
|    |  | R. Keith Guelpa        
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer
|    |  | May 10, 2005
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Daniel M. Cofall, Chief Financial Officer of Harrell Hospitality Group, Inc., certify that;
(1)	I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2006 of Harrell Hospitality Group, Inc.;
 (2)	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 (3)	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 (4)	The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 	a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 	b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 	c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal year end that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
(5)	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 	a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
	b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: January 12, 2007
*/s/ Daniel M. Cofall*
___________________________________  By: Daniel M. Cofall  Title: Chief Financial Officer
### §251k. Economic dislocation in land acquisition; exchange of lands; transfers of land within a national forest; concurrence of Secretary of Agriculture

In order to minimize economic dislocation in acquiring property within the park, the Secretary may acquire with the consent of the owner, lands and interests in lands outside the boundaries of the park, but within the State of Washington, and with the concurrence of the Secretary of Agriculture, he may utilize lands and interests therein within a national forest in the State of Washington hereby authorized to be transferred to the Secretary, for the purpose of exchanging lands and interests so acquired or transferred for property within the park.

(Pub. L. 94–578, title III, §320(h), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2741.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Land Exchanges

Pub. L. 100–71, title I, July 11, 1987, 101 Stat. 415, provided in part: "That pursuant to 16 U.S.C. 251k, the Secretary may acquire the 270-acre parcel known as Keystone Spit on Whidbey Island, Washington, and convey such parcel to the State of Washington in exchange for the approximately 1,000 acres of tidelands owned by such State within the boundary of Olympic National Park: Provided further, That if recreational uses of these tidelands must be regulated, the National Park Service shall consult with the State of Washington prior to the implementation of any such regulations: Provided further, That the exchange must include the mineral rights of the tidelands."
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

Release No. 9866 / July 22, 2015

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-16511 

In the Matter of 

The Registration Statement of

International Precious Metals, Inc.

64040 Harvest Moon Road

Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240

NOTICE THAT INITIAL DECISION HAS BECOME FINAL

The time for filing a petition for review of the initial decision in this proceeding has 

expired. No such petition has been filed by International Precious Metals, Inc., and the 

Commission has chosen not to review the decision on its own initiative.

Accordingly, notice is hereby given, pursuant to Rule 360(d) of the Commission's Rules 

of Practice,1that the initial decision of the administrative law judge has become the final 

decision of the Commission with respect to International Precious Metals, Inc.2The order

contained in that decision is hereby declared effective. The initial decision ordered that, pursuant 

to Section 8(d) of the Securities Act of 1933, the effectiveness of the Form S-1 registration 

statement of International Precious Metals, Inc., filed November 7, 2013, and amended on 

January 15, 2014, is suspended.

For the Commission, by the Office of the General Counsel, pursuant to delegated 

authority.

Brent J. Fields

 Secretary

 

1

17 C.F.R. § 201.360(d).

2

 The Registration Statement of Int'l Precious Metals, Inc., 64040 Harvest Moon Road,

Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240, Initial Decision Release No. 808 (June 10, 2015), 111 SEC 

Docket 14, 2015 WL 3610557.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Administrative Proceedings Rulings

Release No. 6894 / December 27, 2022

Administrative Proceeding

File No. 3-17228

In the Matter of

David S. Hall, P.C. d/b/a The Hall 

Group CPAs,

David S. Hall, CPA,

Michelle L. Helterbran Cochran, 

CPA, and

Susan A. Cisneros

Order on Stay Motion

The Division of Enforcement filed a motion to continue a stay of this 

proceeding pending the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. Cochran, No. 21-

1239, “or further order of the [Securities and Exchange] Commission.” Motion 

at 2–3. It further requested that any stay remain in place pending the 

resolution of any petition for certiorari that may be filed in Jarkesy v. SEC, 34 

F.4th 446 (5th Cir. 2022), rehr’g en banc denied, 51 F.4th 644 (5th Cir. 2022)—

up to and including a Supreme Court decision on such a petition—a case 

raising related constitutional issues. Respondent Michelle L. Helterbran 

Cochran objected in part to the Division’s motion, but agreed that the case 

should be stayed until the Supreme Court issues its decision in Cochran.

As I previously noted, my authority is limited to postponing the hearing 

and other deadlines in this proceeding; I cannot issue a stay except in 

circumstances not relevant here. See 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.161, .210(c)(3); Paul 

Free, CPA, Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Release No. 66260, 2012 WL 

266986, at *2 (Jan. 26, 2012); see also Pending Admin. Proc., Securities Act of 

1933 Release No. 10536, 2018 WL 4003609, at *2 n.7, *6 (Aug. 22, 2018). Given 

the posture of the case, all deadlines will remain postponed until the Supreme 

Court issues its decision in Cochran.
2

Four weeks following that decision, the parties shall file a motion or status 

update advising whether further postponement will be necessary and 

addressing any related issues, such as the impact of Jarkesy.

/s/ Jason S. Patil

Administrative Law Judge
Flight Checklist

LED

Motors inactive, safe to 

handle

Low battery, automatic landing

Loss of RC signal, automatic landing

Pre-arm safety check failure

Loss of GPS signal, switch to manual

Initializing, hold the X8 level

Acquiring GPS, please wait

Autopilot ready, GPS locked

Armed

Safety Button

Motors active, deactivate before 

handling (see reverse)

Flight Modes

Return to launch

RTL

land at the launch point

Stabalize

Altitude Hold

Loiter

Full Autonomy

Standard position 

(altitude hold mode)

STD

fly manually

Loiter mode

LTR

hover

Stabalize

Altitude Hold

Loiter

Full Autonomy

Return to Launch

!

Stand back!

4 6

The motors are 

now active.

Hold left stick downright until motors spin.

1 2 Power on controller;

set to STD and RTL OFF.

Arm 

motors.

Press and hold safety 

button until solid red.

Connect

charged battery.

Choose a clear launch 

point, and face the X8 

away from you. 

5 Check 3 LED.

Place the X8 at 

launch point.

Go outside to 

an open area!

See the Operation 

Manual for complete 

instructions.

Auto mode

AUTO

fly a mission

©2014 3D Robotics. vA. All rights reserved.

Control gimbal

TILT

tilt the camera down and up

Land

CH7

land at the current position

Stabalize

Altitude Hold

Loiter

Full Autonomy

Stabalize

Altitude Hold

Loiter

Full Autonomy

X8+

Hold the X8 still 

and level while 

powering on.
Press and hold until 

blinking red to deactivate.

Hold left stick downleft until motors stop. 

1 2 Disarm 

motors.

Press safety 

button. 3 Disconnect battery. 4Power off 

controller. Postflight

Controller Flight Data

Press and hold the DN button to access the flight data screens. 

Press DN again to toggle between screens.

Lower left stick below 

center to descend.

Set left stick fully down to 

land when near the ground.

Left Stick

Left Stick

Raise left stick above 

center to take off and 

gain altitude.

Move left stick left 

and right to rotate.

Use right stick to fly forward, 

backward, left, and right.

Set left stick to center 

to maintain altitude.

Left Stick

Left Stick

Flight

current flight mode

controller battery level (9-12 V)

GPS signal strength in # of 

satellites

meters from launch point

flight battery level (14-16.8 V)

connection strength

current latitude

current longitude

altitude in meters

flight time

altitude in meters

For customer support, contact us at help@3dr.com

or call our support line at +1 (858) 225-1414 

Monday through Friday, from 8 am to 5 pm, PST.

3DR.com/X8/info 

GPS status

speed in m/s

flight battery mAh 

consumed since armed

End your flight at 14.1 V.

Do not exceed 8,000 mAh for 

a fully charged X8+ battery 

(80% of available capacity).

!
### §407m–7. Exchange of property

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to convey on behalf of the United States a certain tract of land, or any interest therein, being a portion of Independence National Historical Park project B, embracing fifteen thousand six hundred and fifty square feet, more or less, and situate on the northeast corner of South Fifth Street and Marshall Court (formerly Manning Street), city of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, together with the improvements thereon, to the Redevelopment Authority of the City of Philadelphia in exchange for property, or interest therein, owned by the authority of approximately equal value and which the Secretary deems necessary for use in connection with the Independence National Historical Park. Property conveyed by the Secretary pursuant to this section shall thereupon cease to be a part of the park, and the property acquired in exchange therefor shall thereafter be a part of the park, subject to all the laws and regulations applicable to the park.

(Pub. L. 88–604, Sept. 18, 1964, 78 Stat. 958.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as a part of act June 28, 1948, ch. 687, 62 Stat. 1061, as amended, which comprises this subchapter.
No. 20,604.

#### The Utilities Board of the City of Lamar *v.*District Court of Prowers County, et al.

(381 P. [2d] 454)

Decided May 13, 1963.

Messrs. Gordon and Gordon, Messrs. Barry and Boyle, for petitioner.

Mr. Carl M. Shinn, for respondents.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Justice Hall

delivered the opinion of the Court.

On December 14, 1962, Southeast Colorado Power Association, herein referred to as Southeast, commenced Civil Action No. 2498 in the respondent court, wherein petitioner here, to which we refer as Lamar, was the defendant. The purpose of said action was to enjoin Lamar from rendering certain utility services to The American Telephone and Telegraph Company and to obtain a declaratory judgment interpreting and defining *287the respective rights of Lamar and Southeast under a written agreement entered into by them, wherein they undertook to define their respective rights and duties in the rendering of utility services at various points of the area in which both were authorized and certificated by the Public Utilities Commission of the State of Colorado to serve.

Lamar moved to dismiss the action for the alleged reason that there was then pending before the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) Case No. 5226 to determine whether Southeast or Lamar should serve the A. T. & T. installation, and that the court had no jurisdiction to determine the questions presented, the same being in the exclusive jurisdiction of the Public Utilities Commission.

On December 22, 1962, this motion was denied by the court. On December 28, 1962, Lamar, petitioner here, commenced this original proceeding wherein it prays that a writ of prohibition be granted prohibiting respondents “ * * * from proceeding in Civil Action No. 2498 *until such time as the Public Utilities Commission of the State of Colorado has acted in case No. 5226.”*(Emphasis supplied.)

On December 31, 1962, this court entered its order directing respondents to stay all proceedings in Case No. 2498 until the further order of the court, and to show cause why the relief sought by petitioner should not be granted.

Respondents answered, contending that the court not only had jurisdiction in Case No. 2498, but was duty bound to resolve the issues therein presented.

Oral arguments were presented before this court on April 15, 1963, at which time counsel in open court directed our attention to the fact that the Public Utilities Commission of Colorado had, on March 27, 1963, entered its order disposing of Case No. 5226, and filed herein a true copy of said order.

Thus it appears that the stay order entered by this *288court has fully served the purpose for which sought, namely, to restrain further proceedings until such time as the Public Utilities Commission acted in Case No. 5226.

Therefore, the order of this court staying proceedings in Case No. 2498 is vacated, and the rule to show cause is discharged.

Mr. Justice Sutton and Mr. Justice McWilliams concur in the result.
#### § 4.8 Hearing.

The hearing on the application shall be held at the offices of the Commission in Washington, DC, or elsewhere as the Commission may direct. The hearing shall be held before the Commission, before one or more Commissioners, or before one or more administrative law judges appointed as provided by section 11 of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 3105) as the Commission by order shall determine. Hearings shall be conducted in accordance with sections 7 and 8 of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 556, 557).
Guerra & Moore LLP, Carlos

Guerra, J. Michael Moore, and

David



# Fourth C **ourt of Appeals**

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 8, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00213

- CV

Mark A. CANTU

, Appellant

v.

GUERRA & MOORE LLP, Carlos Guerra, J. Michael Moore, and David Lumber,

Appellee s

From the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Cour t No. 2012CVQ0001154 D2

Honorable Monica Z. Notzon, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

- not participating

On August 4, 2014, Appell ees filed a motion for rehearing. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.1.

The c ourt requests that Appellant file a response. See id. R. 49.2.

If Appellant chooses to file a response

, he must file it within TWENTY DAYS of the

date of this order.

It is so ordered on this 8 th day of August , 2014.



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### § 40.2 Adoption of procedures.

Each applicant seeking certification of its grievance procedure for purposes of the Act shall adopt a written grievance procedure. Inmates and employees shall be afforded an advisory role in the formulation and implementation of a grievance procedure adopted after the effective date of these regulations, and shall be afforded an advisory role in reviewing the compliance with the standards set forth herein of a grievance procedure adopted prior to the effective date of these regulations.