UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 81300 / August 2, 2017

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-18097

In the Matter of 

China Greenstar Corporation, 

Cortronix Biomedical

Advancement Technologies, Inc., 

HW Holdings, Inc., and 

Microelectronics Technology Company,

Respondents.

ORDER INSTITUTING 

ADMINISTRATIVE 

PROCEEDINGS AND NOTICE 

OF HEARING PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 12(j) OF THE 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE 

ACT OF 1934

I.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it necessary and 

appropriate for the protection of investors that public administrative proceedings be, and hereby 

are, instituted pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange 

Act”) against the Respondents named in the caption.

II.

After an investigation, the Division of Enforcement alleges that:

A. RESPONDENTS1

1. China Greenstar Corporation (“FAFA”) (CIK No. 1551454) is a void Delaware

corporation located in Kowloon, Hong Kong with a class of securities registered with the 

Commission pursuant to Exchange Act Section 12(g). FAFA is delinquent in its periodic filings 

with the Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-Q for the 

period ended June 30, 2015, which reported a net loss of $169,598 for the prior six months. As 

of July 26, 2017, the common stock of FAFA was quoted on OTC Link operated by OTC 

Markets Group Inc. (formerly “Pink Sheets”) (“OTC Link”), had three market makers and was 

eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11(f)(3).

 

1The short form of each respondent’s name is also its ticker symbol. 
2

2. Cortronix Biomedical Advancement Technologies, Inc. (“CBAT”) (CIK No. 

1380713) is a revoked Nevada corporation located in Doral, Florida with a class of securities 

registered with the Commission pursuant to Exchange Act Section 12(g). CBAT is delinquent in 

its periodic filings with the Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a 

Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2014, which reported a net loss of $5,205,941 for the 

prior nine months. As of July 26, 2017, the common shares of CBAT were quoted on OTC Link, 

had five market makers, and were eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 

15c2-11(f)(3).

3. HW Holdings, Inc. (“HHWW”) (CIK No. 1396118) is a defaulted Nevada

corporation located in Los Angeles, California with a class of securities registered with the 

Commission pursuant to Exchange Act Section 12(g). HHWW is delinquent in its periodic 

filings with the Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-Q for 

the period ended June 30, 2015, which reported a comprehensive loss of $111,110 for the prior 

six months. As of July 26, 2017, the common stock of HHWW was quoted on OTC Link, had 

six market makers, and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c2-

11(f)(3).

4. Microelectronics Technology Company (“MELY”) (CIK No. 1329136) is a 

revoked Nevada corporation located in Las Vegas, Nevada with a class of securities registered 

with the Commission pursuant to Exchange Act Section 12(g). MELY is delinquent in its 

periodic filings with the Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 

10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2015, which reported a net loss of $4,999,179 for the prior 

nine months. As of July 26, 2017, the common stock of MELY was quoted on OTC Link, had 

seven market makers, and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 

15c2-11(f)(3).

B. DELINQUENT PERIODIC FILINGS

5. As discussed in more detail above, all of the Respondents are delinquent in their 

periodic filings with the Commission, have repeatedly failed to meet their obligations to file 

timely periodic reports, and failed to heed delinquency letters sent to them by the Division of 

Corporation Finance requesting compliance with their periodic filing obligations or, through 

their failure to maintain a valid address on file with the Commission as required by Commission 

rules, did not receive such letters.

6. Exchange Act Section 13(a) and the rules promulgated thereunder require issuers 

of securities registered pursuant to Exchange Act Section 12 to file with the Commission current 

and accurate information in periodic reports, even if the registration is voluntary under Section 

12(g). Specifically, Exchange Act Rule 13a-1 requires issuers to file annual reports, and 

Exchange Act Rule 13a-13 requires domestic issuers to file quarterly reports. 

7. As a result of the foregoing, Respondents failed to comply with Exchange Act 

Section 13(a) and Rules 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder.
3

III.

In view of the allegations made by the Division of Enforcement, the Commission deems 

it necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors that public administrative 

proceedings be instituted to determine: 

A. Whether the allegations contained in Section II hereof are true and, in connection 

therewith, to afford the Respondents an opportunity to establish any defenses to such 

allegations; and,

B. Whether it is necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors to suspend 

for a period not exceeding twelve months, or revoke the registration of each class of securities 

registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act of the Respondents identified in Section 

II hereof, and any successor under Exchange Act Rules 12b-2 or 12g-3, and any new corporate 

names of any Respondents.

IV.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a public hearing for the purpose of taking evidence on 

the questions set forth in Section III hereof shall be convened at a time and place to be fixed, 

and before an Administrative Law Judge to be designated by further order as provided by Rule 

110 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice [17 C.F.R. § 201.110].

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that each Respondent shall file an Answer to 

the allegations contained in this Order within ten (10) days after service of this Order, as 

provided by Rule 220(b) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice [17 C.F.R. § 201.220(b)].

If any Respondent fails to file the directed Answer, or fails to appear at a hearing after 

being duly notified, such Respondent, and any successor under Exchange Act Rules 12b-2 or 

12g-3, and any new corporate names of such Respondent, may be deemed in default and the 

proceedings may be determined against it upon consideration of the allegations of this Order as 

to such Respondent, which may be deemed to be true as provided by Rules 155(a), 220(f), 

221(f), and 310 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice [17 C.F.R. §§ 201.155(a), 201.220(f), 

201.221(f), and 201.310].

This Order shall be served forthwith upon Respondents by any means permitted by the 

Commission Rules of Practice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 360(a)(2) of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice, [17 C.F.R. § 201.360(a)(2)], the Administrative Law Judge shall issue an 

initial decision no later than thirty (30) days from the occurrence of one of the following events: 

(A) The completion of post-hearing briefing in a proceeding where the hearing has been 

completed; (B) Where the hearing officer has determined that no hearing is necessary, upon 

completion of briefing on a motion pursuant to Rule 250 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, 

[17 C.F.R. § 201.250]; or (C) The determination by the hearing officer that a party is deemed to 

be in default under Rule 155 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, [17 C.F.R. § 201.155] and 

no hearing is necessary. 
4

In the absence of an appropriate waiver, no officer or employee of the Commission 

engaged in the performance of investigative or prosecuting functions in this or any factually 

related proceeding will be permitted to participate or advise in the decision of this matter, 

except as witness or counsel in proceedings held pursuant to notice. Since this proceeding is not 

“rule making” within the meaning of Section 551 of the Administrative Procedure Act, it is not 

deemed subject to the provisions of Section 553 delaying the effective date of any final 

Commission action.

By the Commission.

Brent J. Fields

Secretary