### Instructions for filling in the Emission Test Template

This Information Collection Request (ICR) spreadsheet is intended to collect information about emission data from fossil fuel burning power plants and which test methods were used to do so for cases where the test methods are not currently supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). This spreadsheet should only be used if the method is not in the ERT or if you do not have access to a lab which performs methods that are in the ERT. You must complete at least 3 separate runs or sampling events for each of the requested constituents. This spreadsheet is intended to be used for one boiler of one facility. Data for multiple boilers should be handled by using separate copies of this spreadsheet. yellow are required. All cells that are shaded in green are populated using drop

- down lists. You do not need to populate cells shaded in gray, as they are automatically populated from the Boiler Information worksheet. resulting spreadsheet with the following naming convention: [FacilityID]_Unit_[BoilerID]_EmisTestMethods.xls (example: 8100_Unit_2_EmisTestMethods.xls).

Please refer to the following steps when using these spreadsheets.

Boiler Information Worksheet

1. Please enter the EIA Facility Code, Facility Name and Boiler ID of your boiler on the Boiler Information worksheet. 2. Please enter the control device configuration.

Emission Data Worksheets

The emission data worksheets are provided for each constituent or constituent family required for this analysis. On each spreadsheet, you must enter boiler operating information during sampling, fuel input information, and emission test results. There are generally 1 to 3 emission test results records to be entered depending on the constituent or constituent family. For example, CO only requires 1 record with 3 sample events, while Mercury requires that you enter both Hg Hg +2 

### , or if the Ontario

- Hydro Method was used, you would need to enter Hg 0

### , HgP, and Hg Volatile Organic HAP and Speciated Semi

-Volatile Organic HAP worksheets allow you to use a drop Constituent field to define as many records as needed to record each HAP that you have results for. General instructions follow for these worksheets:

Boiler Operation Information

1. Please provide the values of all requested parameters for each of test run/sample. 2. Please provide any other supporting information or comments in the Other Supporting Information field.

Fuel Information

1. Please enter what types of fuel are being used in your boiler using the drop

- downs in the Fuel Type Selection field. You may enter up to 4 fuel types. If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples, then enter an input rate of zero. 2. Please enter the unit of measure using the drop down provided. 3. Please enter the test method used to determine the fuel input rate. 4. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field.

Emission Data

### 1. Some constituents ask for the emission rate results of each run in two different units of measure, while others do not. If emission rate results are requested in two different units of measure (ex. lb/MMBtu (Pounds per million BTU) and ppmvd @ 7% O 2 

### (parts per million by volume dry basis at 7 percent oxygen)), you are required to provide both. 2. Please provide the test method used. This may or may not match the example given in the Test Method Used field. Please ensure that the name includes the owning organization of the test method (ex. U.S. EPA Method 0010). 3. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field. 4. If data sheets and QA/QC documentation tables are provided for the test method you are entering data for please also enter these data.

### This Information Collection Request (ICR) spreadsheet is intended to collect information about emission data from fossil fuel burning power plants and which test methods were used to do so for cases where the test methods are not currently supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). This spreadsheet should only be used if the method is not in the ERT or if you do not have access to a lab which performs methods that are in the ERT. You must complete at least 3 separate This spreadsheet is intended to be used for one boiler of one facility. Data for multiple boilers should be handled by using separate copies of this spreadsheet. Fields shaded in down lists. You do not need to populate cells shaded in gray, as they are automatically populated from the Boiler Information worksheet. Please name each resulting spreadsheet with the following naming convention: [FacilityID]_Unit_[BoilerID]_EmisTestMethods.xls

1. Please enter the EIA Facility Code, Facility Name and Boiler ID of your boiler on the Boiler Information worksheet.

The emission data worksheets are provided for each constituent or constituent family required for this analysis. On each spreadsheet, you must enter boiler operating information during sampling, fuel input information, and emission test results. There are generally 1 to 3 emission test results records to be entered depending on the constituent or constituent family. For example, CO only requires 1 record with 3 sample events, while Mercury requires that you enter both Hg 0 

### and , HgP, and Hg +2 

### . However, both the Speciated Volatile Organic HAP worksheets allow you to use a drop

- down provided in the Constituent field to define as many records as needed to record each HAP that you have results for. General instructions

2. Please provide any other supporting information or comments in the Other Supporting Information field.

downs in the Fuel Type Selection field. You may enter up to 4 fuel types. If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples,

4. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field.

### 1. Some constituents ask for the emission rate results of each run in two different units of measure, while others do not. If emission rate results are requested in two different units of measure (ex. lb/MMBtu (Pounds per million BTU) and

(parts per million by volume dry basis at 7 percent oxygen)), you are required to provide both. 2. Please provide the test method used. This may or may not match the example given in the Test Method Used field. Please ensure that the name includes the owning organization of the test method (ex. U.S. EPA Method 0010). 3. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field. 4. If data sheets and QA/QC documentation tables are provided for the test method you are entering data for please alsoEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 10672 Cedar Bay CBBControl Device Configuraton

Listed (by

boiler) in the Configuration Order Section of the Facility Unit Configurations Section of the Electronic ICRListed (by boiler) in the Configuration Order Section of the Facility Unit Configurations Section of the Electronic ICREIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

10672 Cedar Bay CBB

CO data provided in CEM spreadsheet Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimeMe asured Value (ppm) Test End Time Test End DateBasis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) CO Emission Test ResultsTest Method Comments lb/mmBtu ppmdv @ 7% O 2 Calculated Emission RateSteam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas Moisture (%)Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas O 2(%) Flue Gas Flow Rate (scfm)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type

Flue Gas Temperature (F) Fuel #1Units of Measure Me asurement Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel #1Fuel Type Units of Measure Me asurement Method Fuel #2Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Fuel #3Me asurement Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Fuel #4Units of Measure Me asurement Method Fuel #4 Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

10672 Cedar Bay CBB

1 5/11/2010 8:53 5/11/2010 2 5/11/2010 12:22 5/11/2010 3 5/11/2010 15:33 5/11/2010 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMe asured Value (ug) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used

10:53 9.9 We t U.S. EPA Method 0011 14:22 8.9 We t U.S. EPA Method 0011 17:28 9.8 We t U.S. EPA Method 0011 Test End Time Formaldehyde Emission Test ResultsData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method Comments lb/mmBtu ppmdv @ 7% O 2

BDL 0.000002 0.6214 780 BDL 0.000002 0.5463 804 BDL 0.000002 0.5891 802 Formaldehyde Emission Test Results Calculated Emission Rate Steam Output (1000 lb/hr)Fuel Input Rate 1060 8.2 13.3 5.4 245870 314 86000 1004 9 13.5 5.2 242223 309 88000 1068 8.1 13.4 5.2 240510 322 87100 Total Heat Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas

Moisture (%) Flue Gas

CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas Flow

Rate (scfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F)Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate bitum inous lb/hour Other bitum inous lb/hour Other bitum inous lb/hour Other Fuel #1 Fuel #2Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of

Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #4 Fuel #3Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

10672 Cedar Bay CBB

1 5/11/2010 11:15 2 5/11/2010 13:30 3 5/11/2010 15:45 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimeMe asured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry)

5/11/2010 13:15 1.1 We t 5/11/2010 15:30 1.1 We t 5/11/2010 17:45 1.1 We t Methane Emission Test Results

Test End Time Test End DateTest Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Test Method Comments lb/mmBtu

U.S. EPA Method 18 BDL 0.001615 U.S. EPA Method 18 BDL 0.001605 U.S. EPA Method 18 BDL 0.001595 Methane Emission Test Results Calculated Emission Rateppmdv @ 7% O 2

0.9616 801 1008.2 13.5 5.27 16846330 0.9556 803 1073.9 13.5 5.15 16873780 0.9497 802 1070.3 13.4 5.19 16823670 Flue Gas O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfh) Calculated Emission Rate Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas

Moisture (%) Flue Gas CO 2(%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of

Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel

Input Rate Fuel Type Units of

Me asure

322 88200 bitum inous lb/hour 323 87800 bitum inous lb/hour 322 87300 bitum inous lb/hour Flue Gas Temperat ure (F) Fuel #1 Fuel #2Me asurement

Method Fuel

Input Rate Fuel Type Units of

Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel

Input Rate Fuel Type Units of

Me asure Fuel #4 Fuel #3Me asurement

Method Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

10672 Cedar Bay CBB

SO2 data provided in CEM spreadsheet

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMe asured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used SO 2Emission Test Results Test End TimeData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments lb/mmBtu ppmdv @ 7% O 2 Calculated Emission Rate Steam Output (1000 lb/hr)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Flue Gas Temperature (F) Fuel #1 Flue Gas O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (scfm) Total Heat Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas

Moisture (%) Flue Gas

CO 2(%)Units of

Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of

Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Fuel #1 Fuel #2 Fuel #3Units of

Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #4 Fuel #3Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

10672 Cedar Bay CBB

1 5/12/2010 12:00 2 5/12/2010 15:15 3 5/13/2010 10:09 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimePlease note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "AI"

Me asured Value (μg/dscm) Basis (Wet or Dry)

5/12/2010 14:00 We t 5/12/2010 17:15 We t 5/13/2010 12:09 We t Test End Date Test End Time Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test ResultsPlease note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "AI"

Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) lbs/mmBtu

Sample A (lb/mmBtu)

Sample B

U.S. EPA Method 30B ADL 1.82507E-08 1.83492E-08 801 U.S. EPA Method 30B ADL 1.92735E-08 2.1897E-08 803 U.S. EPA Method 30B ADL 1.47747E-08 2.16411E-08 791 Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test ResultsFuel Input Rate

1086 13.6 16536730 324 88700 1093 13.7 16629820 324 89200 1070 13.8 16171890 318 87400 Total Heat Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfh) Flue Gas

Temperature (F)Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of

Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate

bitum inous lb/hour Other bitum inous lb/hour Other anthracite lb/hour Other Fuel #1 Fuel #2Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #3 Fuel #4QA /QC Documentation

Trap ID Section 1

Mass (ng) Section 2

Mass (ng) Total

Mass (ng) Initial

Spike (ng) Total NonSpike (ng)

65900 6.955 0.6 7.554 0 7.554 65852 8.085 0.515 8.6 0 8.6 65897 5.757 0.793 6.55 0 6.55 Other Supporting InformationSample

Volume (dscm) Volume

Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit Breaktrough

(%) Breaktrough

Limit Concentration

(μg/dscm) Trap ID

252.174 0.823 8.626887132 2.99555E-05 65727 271.857 0.045 6.369820656 3.16343E-05 65734 270.101 1.832 13.77453535 2.42502E-05 65589 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! ≤ 20% of field

recovery test ≤10% of Section 1 Hg

ma ss for Hg conc. >1

μg/dscm: or ≤ 20% of Section Trap #1Section 1

Ma ss Section 2

Mass Total

Mass Initial

Spike Total NonSpike Sample

Volume Volume

Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit

56.887 0.683 57.57 50 7.57 251.351 0.823 59.29 0.479 59.769 50 9.769 271.812 0.045 58.722 0.807 59.529 50 9.529 268.269 1.832 ≤ 20% of field

recovery test Trap #2Breaktrough (%) Breaktrough Limit Concentration

(μg/dscm) Ab s. diff. RD (%) Limit C rec

1.200625802 3.01172E-05 1.62E-07 0.269239 50 0.807893405 3.59403E-05 4.31E-06 6.372226 51.1 1.374271993 3.55203E-05 1.13E-05 18.85567 53 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! ≥ 10 % RD mass for Hg conc. >1 μg/dscm: or

≤ 20% RD or ≤ 0.2 μg/dscm abs.diff. for Hg conc. ≤1 ≤10% of Section 1 Hg mass for Hg conc. >1

μg/dscm: or ≤ 20% of Section 1 for Hg conc. ≤1 Me asured Spike Recovery ( R ) Paired Trap Agreement (RD)R (%) by

Run Ravg(%) Limit

100 102.3 106 Average Recovery

, between 85 and 115% Me asured Spike Recovery ( R )

102.7666667EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

10672 Cedar Bay CBB

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimeMe asured Hg 0Value (μg/dscm) Me asured Hg +2Value (μg/dscm) Test End Time Test End DateMe asured Hg PValue

(μg/dscm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test ResultsTest Method

Comments Total Mercury (lb/mmBtu) Flue Gas CO 2(%) Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas

Moisture (%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #1 Flue Gas O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (scfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Other Supporting Information Fuel #4EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

10672 Cedar Bay CBB

Speciated Volatile Organic HAP Emission Data

Carbon disulfide 1 5/1/2010 Carbon disulfide 1 5/1/2010 Carbon disulfide 1 5/1/2010 Carbon disulfide 2 5/1/2010 Carbon disulfide 2 5/1/2010 Carbon disulfide 2 5/1/2010 Carbon disulfide 3 5/2/2010 Carbon disulfide 3 5/2/2010 Carbon disulfide 3 5/2/2010

Compound (use drop down to define for as many

rows as needed) Run Number Test Start Date

### NOT REQUIRED

Note: Each run should include a value for each fraction and the total for each pollutant.

Fraction Me asured Value

(ppm) 10:00 AM 5/1/2010 12:00 PM Front Half* 10:00 AM 5/1/2010 12:00 PM Back Half** 10:00 AM 5/1/2010 12:00 PM Total 2:00 PM 5/1/2010 5:00 PM Front Half* 2:00 PM 5/1/2010 5:00 PM Back Half** 2:00 PM 5/1/2010 5:00 PM Total 10:00 AM 5/2/2010 12:00 PM Front Half* 10:00 AM 5/2/2010 12:00 PM Back Half** 10:00 AM 5/2/2010 12:00 PM Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Test End Time Test Start Time Test End DateBack Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half**Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** TotalFront Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half*Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half**Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** TotalFront Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half*Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** Total Front Half* Back Half** TotalFootnotes:

* Front half fraction contains filter, cyclone, and cartridge ** Back half fraction contains condensate, solvent, impingers

Basis Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Volatile Organic HAP Emission Test ResultsTest Method

Comments lb/mmBtu ppmdv @ 7% O 2 Calculated Emission Rate Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Flue Gas Temperature (F) Fuel #1 Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas

CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas Flow

Rate (scfm)Units of

Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Fuel #1 Fuel #2 Fuel #3Units of

Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #3 Fuel #4Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

10672 Cedar Bay CBB

Speciated Semi-Volatile Organic HAP Emission Data

Acenaphthene 1 5/1/2010 Acenaphthene 1 5/1/2010 Acenaphthene 1 5/1/2010 Acenaphthene 1 5/1/2010 Acenaphthene 2 5/1/2010 Acenaphthene 2 5/1/2010 Acenaphthene 2 5/1/2010 Acenaphthene 3 5/1/2010 Acenaphthene 3 5/2/2010 Acenaphthene 3 5/2/2010 Acenaphthene 3 5/2/2010

Compound (use drop down to define for as many rows as needed) Run Number Test Start Date

### NOT REQUIRED

Note: Each run should include a value for each fraction and the total for each pollutant.

10:00 AM 5/1/2010 12:00 PM 10:00 AM 5/1/2010 12:00 PM 10:00 AM 5/1/2010 12:00 PM 10:00 AM 5/1/2010 12:00 PM 2:00 PM 5/1/2010 5:00 PM 2:00 PM 5/1/2010 5:00 PM 2:00 PM 5/1/2010 5:00 PM 2:00 PM 5/1/2010 5:00 PM 10:00 AM 5/2/2010 12:00 PM 10:00 AM 5/2/2010 12:00 PM 10:00 AM 5/2/2010 12:00 PM

Test End Date Test Start Time Test End TimeFootnotes: * Front Half Composite contains particulate filter, front half of the filter holder, and probe solvent rinses ** Back Half Composite contains XAD-2 resin tube, back half of the filter holder, and coil condenser solvent rinses *** Condensate Composite contains condensate and Impinger contents and the glassware solvent rinses

Fraction Me asured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry)

Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite**Condensate Composite***

Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite*Back Half Composite**

Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total CompositeFront Half Composite*

Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite***Total Composite

Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite**Condensate Composite***

Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite*Back Half Composite**

Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total CompositeFront Half Composite*

Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite Front Half Composite* Back Half Composite** Condensate Composite*** Total Composite* Front Half Composite contains particulate filter, front half of the filter holder, and probe solvent rinses ** Back Half Composite contains XAD-2 resin tube, back half of the filter holder, and coil condenser solvent rinses *** Condensate Composite contains condensate and Impinger contents and the glassware solvent rinses

Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Semi-Volatile Organic HAP Emission Test ResultsTest Method

Comments lb/mmBtu ppmdv @ 7% O 2 Calculated Emission Rate Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Fuel #1 Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (scfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F) Flue Gas Moisture (%)Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Fuel #2 Fuel #3Me asurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Other Supporting Information Fuel #4EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 10672 Cedar Bay CBB

1 5/11/2010 8:51 5/11/2010 2 5/11/2010 12:22 5/11/2010 3 5/11/2010 15:45 5/11/2010 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMe asured Value (ug) Basis (Wet or Dry)

11:43 55 We t 15:14 57 We t 18:37 59.7 We t Test End TimeTest Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments U.S. EPA Conditional Test Method 033 (CTM-033) BDL 0.000009 U.S. EPA Conditional Test Method 033 (CTM-033) BDL 0.000009 U.S. EPA Conditional Test Method 033 (CTM-033) BDL 0.000009 Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Hydrogen Cyanide Emission Test ResultsFuel Input Rate 782 1064 9.67 13.4 5.24 243429 312.8 86900 804 1026 9.3 13.5 5.17 238673 318.8 87900 805 1075 9.46 13.5 5.17 252861 318.4 87700 Flue Gas Temperature (F) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr)Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input Rate

bitum inous lb/hour Other bitum inous lb/hour Other bitum inous lb/hour Other Fuel #1 Fuel #2Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #4 Fuel #3dedicated weight belt for coal

Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 10672 Cedar Bay CBB

1 5/11/2010 8:51 5/11/2010 2 5/11/2010 12:22 5/11/2010 3 5/11/2010 15:45 5/11/2010 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMe asured Value (ug) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used

11:43 312613 We t U.S. EPA Method 26A-Mod 15:14 238567 We t U.S. EPA Method 26A-Mod 18:37 367184 We t U.S. EPA Method 26A-Mod Test End Time Hydrogen Chloride Emission Test ResultsData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments ADL 0.050479 782 1064 9.67 13.4 ADL 0.039739 804 1026 9.3 13.5 ADL 0.057522 805 1075 9.46 13.5 Hydrogen Chloride Emission Test Results Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas CO 2(%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate 5.24 243429 312.8 86900 bitum inous lb/hour Other 5.17 238673 318.8 87900 bitum inous lb/hour Other 5.17 252861 318.4 87700 bitum inous lb/hour Other Flue Gas Flow Rate (scfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F) Fuel #1 Flue Gas O 2(%)Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #4 Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 10672 Cedar Bay CBB

1 5/11/2010 8:51 5/11/2010 2 5/11/2010 12:22 5/11/2010 3 5/11/2010 15:45 5/11/2010 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMe asured Value (ug) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used

11:43 324 We t U.S. EPA Method 26A-Mod 15:14 336 We t U.S. EPA Method 26A-Mod 18:37 352 We t U.S. EPA Method 26A-Mod Hydrogen Flouride Emission Test Results Test End TimeData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments BDL 0.000052 782 1064 9.67 BDL 0.000056 804 1026 9.3 BDL 0.000055 805 1075 9.46 Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Hydrogen Flouride Emission Test Results Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method 13.4 5.24 243429 312.8 86900 bitum inous lb/hour Other 13.5 5.17 238673 318.8 87900 bitum inous lb/hour Other 13.5 5.17 252861 318.4 87700 bitum inous lb/hour Other Flue Gas Temperature (F) Fuel #1 Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (scfm)Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #4 Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

10672 Cedar Bay CBB



### NOX data provided in CEM spreadsheet

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimeMe asured NO (ppm) Test End Time Test End DateMe asured NO 2(ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used NO XEmission Test ResultsData Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Test Method Comments (lb/mmBtu) Total NO XCalculated Emission Rateppmdv @ 7% O 2 Flue Gas O 2(%) Calculated Emission Rate Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input

(mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas

Moisture (%) Flue Gas

CO 2(%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Flue Gas Temperature (F) Fuel #1 Flue Gas Flow Rate (scfm)Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #4 Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

10672 Cedar Bay CBB

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time

### Not applicable

Total Dissolved Solids (mg solids/liter) Total Suspended Solids (mg solids/liter) Test End Time Test End DateTest Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Constisuent Emission Test ResultsTest Method Comments Fuel Input Rate Flue Gas Temperat ure (F) Flue Gas Flow Rate (scfm) Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input

(mmBtu/hr)Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel #1 Fuel #2Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of

Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #4 Fuel #3Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 10672 Cedar Bay CBB

Me asured Value (ppm) Basis

(Wet or Dry)

1 5/11/2010 11:15 5/11/2010 13:15 0.74 We t 2 5/11/2010 13:30 5/11/2010 15:30 0.69 We t 3 5/11/2010 15:45 5/11/2010 17:45 1.01 We t Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End Date Test End Time Methane Emission Test ResultsTest Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Test Method Comments lb/mmBtu ppmdv @ 7% O 2

BDL Method 25A 0.001087 0.6469 801 BDL Method 25A 0.001007 0.5994 803 BDL Method 25A 0.001465 0.872 802

Calculated Emission

Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Methane Emission Test Results1008.2 13.5 5.27 16846330 1073.9 13.5 5.15 16873780 1070.3 13.4 5.19 16823670 Flue Gas Flow Rate (dscfh) Total Heat Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of

Me asure Me asure

ment Method Fuel

Input Rate Fuel Ty pe Units of Me asure Me asure

ment Method Fuel

Input Rate

322 88200 bitum inous lb/hour 323 87800 bitum inous lb/hour 322 87300 bitum inous lb/hour Flue Gas Temperature (F) Fuel #1 Fuel #2Fuel

Ty pe Units of Me asure Me asure

ment Method Fuel

Input Rate Fuel Ty pe Units of Me asure Me asure

ment Method Other Supporting Information Fuel #3 Fuel #4