alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNIT E D ST AT E S CO URT O F APPE AL S FO R T H E NINT HCIRCUIT
PH YSICIANS FO R SO CIAL RE SPO NSIB IL IT Y-L O S ANG E L E S; NAT URAL RE SO URCE S DE FE N SE CO U NCIL ; CO M M UNIT IE S FO R A B E T T E R E NV IRO NM E NT , Petitioners,
v. U.S. E NV IRO NM E NT AL PRO T E CT IO N AG E NCY , R

e sponde nt , T H E SO UT HCO AST AIR Q UAL I T Y M ANAG E M E NT DIST RICT ; T H E SO UT H E RN CAL IFO RNIA ASSO CIAT IO N O F G O V E R NM E N T S , R

e sponde nt s-Inte rve nors. No. 12-70079

M E M O RANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the Unite d State s Environme nta l Prote c tion Age nc y Argue d a nd Submitte d Oc tobe r 22, 2014 Pa sa de n a , C a l ifornia 

# F IL ED
JUN 09 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3.pa ge 2

B e fore : T H O M AS , C hie f Judge , a nd K O Z INSKI and G O UL D , C irc uit Judge s. 1. EPA’ s a

p prova l of thee nforc e a

b le c om m itm e nt wa sn’ t a

rbitra ry and
c a pric ious. EPA re a s ona

bly a pplie d its thre e -pa

rt te st for e va luating suc h
c om m itm e nts in c onc luding tha t: (1) thec om

m itm e nt wa s suffic ie ntly limite d be c a use it a ddre s se d re duc tions of a bout 10% for thre e polluta nts, whic h is roughly within therange EPA ha s historic a lly a c c e pte d ; (2) thesta

t e wa s c a pa ble of fulfilling the

c om m itm e nt ba se d

on a num be r of ongoing a

n d y e t-to-be -qua

ntifie d
m e a sure s; a

nd (3) thec om

m itm e nt’ s two-a

nd-a -ha lf-y e ar duration wa s re a sona ble , give n tha t thesta te ha d a lre a dy la

unc he d m any e m issions-re duc tion m e a s ure s. Se e 76 Fe d. R e g. 41,562, 41,575–77 (July 14, 2011); 76 Fe d. R e g . 69,928, 69,944–45 (Nov. 9, 2011).
2. The c om

m itm e nt wa s suffic ie ntly

e nforc e a ble be c a use it “re quire [s] C a lifornia to m e e t spe c ific re duc tions by spe c ific de a dline s,” rathe r tha n m e re ly
se tting forth “ a spira

tiona l, une nforc e a

ble goa ls.” Se e C om

m . for a B e tte r Arvin v. EPA, Nos. 11-73924, 12-71332, __ F.3d __, 2015 W L 2384556, a

t *8 (9th C ir. M ay 20, 2015).pa ge 3

3. The sta

te i m p le m e ntation pla

n doe s n’ t im

p e rm issibly

ignore pollution in
ne ar-highwa

y are a s be c a

use the m onitoring guide line s e xplic itly spe c ify that sta

te s ge ne ra lly ne e d not mo nitor “m ic rosc a le ” or “ m iddle sc a le ” are a s, whic h inc l ude

“ tra ffic c o rridors” and a

re a s “ a long tra ffic c orridors.” 40 C .F.R . Pt. 58, App. D, § 4.7.1(c )(1)–(2).
DE NIE D.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of Security Biometrics, Inc., (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-QSB  for the nine month period ended March 31, 2004, as
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"), we certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S)
906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     1.   The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
          15  (d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.   The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the  Company.


Date:   June  3,  2004               By:  /s/  Wayne  Taylor
                                     -----------------------
                                     Name: Wayne Taylor, Interim Chief Executive
                                           Officer and Interim Chief Financial
                                           Officer


                                       40
<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 9 (Thursday, January 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 2431]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-649]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12320 and <greek-i>12321]


New Mexico Disaster <greek-i>NM-00016

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of New Mexico 
(FEMA-1936-DR), dated 09/13/2010.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 07/25/2010 through 08/09/2010.

DATES: Effective Date: 01/04/2011.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/12/2010.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/13/2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of NEW 
MEXICO, dated 09/13/2010, is hereby amended to include the following 
areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Areas: The Navajo Nation, The Pueblo of Acoma.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-649 Filed 1-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
file:///G|/

... RD-TRI/Nguyet/OAR-2014-0557%2044731.%206_6_2014%20-%20National%20Wildlife%20Federation%20Action%20Fund.txt [9/26/2014 9:31:42 AM] From: National Wildlife Federation Action Fund <info@nwa.org> To: OilandGas.Whitepapers Date: 6/6/2014 7:33:41 PM Subject: Cut Methane Pollution from Oil and Gas Drilling

---------------------------------------------------------------- Jun 6, 2014 Environmental Protection Agency Dear Agency, Thank you for your ongoing efforts to limit the carbon footprint of our power sector. However, we must ensure that this monumental effort truly delivers the intended climate benefits by limiting methane emissions from the natural gas industry. Reducing methane is critical to slowing the rate of climate change in the next few decades. The oil and gas industry is the nation's biggest methane polluter, and the nation's second-biggest source of climate-changing carbon pollution. Only carbon pollution from power plants is a bigger climate polluter. President Obama promised action to curb methane pollution as part of his Climate Action Plan. Now it is time for the Environmental Protection Agency to take action on methane pollution. The Clean Air Act gives EPA the power to set strong standards that can cut oil and gas methane pollution at least in half and we urge you to do so. Please act now to cut harmful methane pollution from oil and gas drilling operations. I strongly support you in this effort! Sincerely, Denie English 216 Myrtle St Uvalde, TX 78801-4232
### §416. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Mar. 3, 1897, ch. 372, §§4, 5, 29 Stat. 622, related to refusal to surrender leased land within national military parks. Section was restated as section 103304 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs, by Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3166.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amazing  Investments,  Inc.,
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2002 as filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the
undersigned, B. Stephen Bailey, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 44 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 44

 Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed retransfer of 
certain defense articles from the United Arab Emirates to the Hashemite 
                           Kingdom of Jordan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2019

Mr. Menendez (for himself, Mr. Graham, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Paul, Mr. Leahy, 
  Mr. Young, and Mr. Reed) introduced the following joint resolution; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed retransfer of 
certain defense articles from the United Arab Emirates to the Hashemite 
                           Kingdom of Jordan.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the issuance of an export 
license with respect to the following proposed retransfer of defense 
articles from the United Arab Emirates to the Hashemite Kingdom of 
Jordan is prohibited:
            (1) The retransfer of the following defense articles, 
        including services and technical data, described in Executive 
        Communication 1428 (EC-1428) submitted to Congress pursuant to 
        section 3(d) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2753(d)) 
        and published in the Congressional Record on June 3, 2019: The 
        proposed retransfer of 500 Paveway II laser guided bombs 
        (including Mk-82 warheads, FMU-152A/B fuzes, and guidance kits) 
        from the United Arab Emirates to Jordan.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered March 3 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 14
- 00688
- CV RICHARD P. DALE, JR. , Appellant
V. PLAZA AT TURTLE CREE K RESIDENCES ASSOCIA TION, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Cou rt Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 12
- 05411 

### O RDER
Before the Court is a ppellee’s February 26, 2015 unopposed second motion for an
exte nsion of time to file a brief. Appellee timely filed its brief on February 27, 2015. Accordingly, we DEN Y appellee’s motion as moot.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
Order entered January 23 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 14

- 00070

- CV

IN RE CARLA ROBINSON, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 301st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F

- 02

- 0668 5

- T



### O RDER The Court has before it relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. We ORDER that relator bear the costs of this original proceeding

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUS TICE
#### § 44.305 Regional offices.

The Special Counsel, in accordance with regulations of the Attorney General, shall establish such regional offices as may be necessary to carry out the Special Counsel's duties.
EXHIBIT 32

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            10 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of China  Ventures  Limited ("the
Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  June 30,  2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report), I. James N.
L. Chow  Principal  Financial and  Accounting  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          Material respects,  the financial condition and result of operation of
          the Company.

                                                        /s/ James N. L. Chow
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        James N. L. Chow
                                                        President, Secretary and
                                                        Principal Financial and
                                                        Accounting Officer

August 10, 2004
#### § 37.13 Agency specific memoranda of understanding.

When a section 504 agency amends its regulations to make them consistent with title I of the ADA, the EEOC and the individual section 504 agency may elect to enter into a memorandum of understanding providing for the investigation and processing of complaints dual filed under both section 504 and title I of the ADA by the section 504 agency.
§ 415.51 Prior non-conforming structures. A structure which was lawful before the adoption of this regulation but which is not in conformity with the provisions hereof, shall be subject to the following conditions (to be enforced by the appropriate authority as to Class I and Class II projects, respectively, under §§ 415.40 through 415.43 of this part): ( a ) A non-conforming structure in the floodway may not be expanded, except that it may be modified, altered or repaired to incorporate flood proofing measures provided such measures do not raise the level of the 100-year flood.
( b ) A non-conforming structure in the floodway which is destroyed or damaged by any means, including a flood, to the extent of 50 percent or more of its market value at that time may not be restored, repaired, reconstructed or improved except in conformity with the provisions of these regulations.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-10088 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ROEL TREVINO, also known as Roy Trevino, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:96-CR-197-ALL

- - - - - - - - - - October 19, 1999 Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Roel Trevino has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the brief, Trevino’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
§ 2.12 Initial hearings: Setting presumptive release dates. ( a ) An initial hearing shall be conducted within 120 days of a prisoner's arrival at a federal institution or as soon thereafter as practicable; except that in a case of a prisoner with a minimum term of parole ineligibility of ten years or more, the initial hearing will be conducted nine months prior to the completion of such a minimum term, or as soon thereafter as practicable.
( b ) Following initial hearing, the Commission shall ( 1 ) set a presumptive release date (either by parole or by mandatory release) within fifteen years of the hearing;
( 2 ) set an effective date of parole; or
( 3 ) continue the prisoner to a fifteen year reconsideration hearing pursuant to § 2.14(c).
( c ) Notwithstanding the above paragraph, a prisoner may not be paroled earlier than the completion of any judicially set minimum term of imprisonment or other period of parole ineligibility fixed by law.
( d ) A presumptive parole date shall be contingent upon an affirmative finding by the Commission that the prisoner has a continued record of good conduct and a suitable release plan and shall be subject to the provisions of §§ 2.14 and 2.28. In the case of a prisoner sentenced under the Narcotic Addict Rehabilitation Act, 18 U.S.C. 4254, a presumptive parole date shall also be contingent upon certification by the Surgeon General pursuant to § 2.3 of these rules. Consideration of disciplinary infractions in cases with presumptive parole dates may be deferred until the commencement of the next in-person hearing or the prerelease record review required by § 2.14(b). While prisoners are encouraged to earn the restoration of forfeited or withheld good time, the Commission will consider the prisoner's overall institutional record in determining whether the conditions of a presumptive parole date have been satisfied.
[42 FR 39809, Aug. 5, 1977, as amended at 44 FR 3405, 3407, Jan. 16, 1979; 48 FR 22919, May 23, 1983; 49 FR 34208, Aug. 29, 1984; 57 FR 41391, Sept. 10, 1992; 60 FR 51350, Oct. 2, 1995]
#### § 13.7 Judicial review.

The decision of the Attorney General is final and conclusive and no court shall have power or jurisdiction to review it.
### §41. Sequoia National Park; establishment; boundaries; trespassers

The tract of land in the State of California known and described as township numbered 18 south, of range numbered 30 east, also township 18 south, range 31 east; and sections 31, 32, 33, and 34, township 17 south, range 30 east, all east of Mount Diablo meridian, is reserved and withdrawn from settlement, occupancy, or sale under the laws of the United States, and dedicated and set apart as a public park, or pleasure ground, for the benefit and enjoyment of the people; and all persons who shall locate or settle upon, or occupy the same or any part thereof except as provided in section 43 of this title, shall be considered trespassers and removed therefrom.

(Sept. 25, 1890, ch. 926, §1, 26 Stat. 478.)
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report of NMXS.com, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned principal executive officer and the principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date: February 6, 2006

 

/s/ Richard Govatski

Richard Govatski, President

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

/s/ Teresa Dickey

Teresa Dickey, Treasurer

(Principal Financial Officer)
#### § 511.13 Searches before entering, or while inside, a Bureau facility or Bureau grounds.

Bureau staff may search you and your belongings (for example, bags, boxes, vehicles, containers in vehicles, jackets or coats, etc.) before entering, or while inside, any Bureau facilities or Bureau grounds, to keep out prohibited objects.
# Introduction

https://www.fia.fs.fed.us/library/database-documentation/index.php

# List of Estimate Tables

# Table DE-1

# Table DE-2

# Table DE-3

# Table DE-4

# Table DE-5

# Table DE-6

# Table DE-7

# Table DE-8

# Table DE-9

# Table DE-10

# Table DE-11

# Table DE-12

# Table DE-13

# Table DE-14

# Table DE-15

# Table DE-16

# Table DE-17

# Table DE-18

# Table DE-19

# Table DE-20

# Table DE-21

# Table DE-22

# Table DE-23

# Table DE-24

# Table DE-25

# Table DE-26

# Table DE-27

# Table DE-28

# Table DE-29

# Table DE-30

# Table DE-31

# Table DE-32

# Table DE-33

# Table DE-34

# Table DE-35

# Table DE-36

# Table DE-37

# Table DE-38

# Table DE-39

# Table DE-40

# Table DE-41

# Table DE-42

# Table DE-43

# Table DE-44

# Table DE-45

# Table DE-46

# Table DE-47

# Table DE-48

# Table DE-49

# Table DE-50

# Table DE-51

# Table DE-52

# Table DE-53

# Table DE-54

# Table DE-55

# Table DE-56

# Table DE-57

# Table DE-58

# Table DE-59

# Table DE-60

# Table DE-61

# Table DE-62

# Table DE-63

# Table DE-64

# Table DE-65

# Table DE-66

# Table DE-67

# Table DE-97

# Table DE-98

# Table DE-99