Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2011 / Notices 16379 

1See Certain Steel Nails From the People’s 

Republic of China: Notice of Preliminary Results 

and Preliminary Rescission, in Part, of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 

56070 (September 15, 2010) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). 

Members of the public are entitled to 

submit written comments; the 

comments must be received in the 

regional office by April 31, 2011. The 

address is Rocky Mountain Regional 

Office, 999—18th Street, Suite 1380S, 

Denver, CO 80202. Comments may be emailed to ebohor@usccr.gov. Records 

generated by this meeting may be 

inspected and reproduced at the Rocky 

Mountain Regional Office, as they 

become available, both before and after 

the meeting. Persons interested in the 

work of this advisory committee are 

advised to go to the Commission’s Web 

site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact 

the Rocky Mountain Regional Office at 

the above e-mail or street address. 

Deaf or hearing-impaired persons who 

will attend the meeting and require the 

services of a sign language interpreter 

should contact the Regional Office at 

least ten (10) working days before the 

scheduled date of the meeting. 

The meeting will be conducted 

pursuant to the provisions of the rules 

and regulations of the Commission and 

FACA. 

Dated in Washington, DC, March 17, 2011. 

Peter Minarik, 

Acting Chief, Regional Programs 

Coordination Unit. 

[FR Doc. 2011–6818 Filed 3–22–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6335–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[Docket 22–2011] 

Foreign-Trade Zone 177—Evansville, 

IN; Application for Manufacturing 

Authority, Best Chair, Inc. d/b/a Best 

Home Furnishings, (Upholstered 

Furniture), Ferdinand, Cannelton, and 

Paoli, IN 

A request has been submitted to the 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) 

by the Ports of Indiana, grantee of FTZ 

177, requesting manufacturing authority 

on behalf of Best Chair, Inc. d/b/a Best 

Home Furnishings (Best Home), to 

manufacture upholstered furniture and 

related parts under FTZ procedures 

within FTZ 177. The application was 

submitted pursuant to the provisions of 

the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), and the 

regulations of the Board (15 CFR part 

400). It was formally filed on March 17, 

2011. 

The Best Home facilities (815 

employees) will be located within the 

FTZ 177 service area at three planned 

sites: Site 5—at 1 Best Drive in 

Ferdinand (Dubois County), Indiana; 

Site 6—at 4502 East State Road 66, 

Cannelton (Perry County), Indiana; and, 

Site 7—at 1700 West Willow Creek 

Road, Paoli (Orange County), Indiana 

(Orange County to be included within 

expanded ASF service area, as proposed 

— Doc. 3–2011, 76 FR 1133, 1–7–2011). 

The facilities are used to produce 

upholstered furniture (up to 1.5 million 

sofas, sectionals, loveseats, chairs, and 

recliners annually) and cut-and-sewn 

upholstery covers for the U.S. market 

and export. The application proposes 

that Best Home utilize foreign-origin 

‘‘micro-denier suede’’ fabric to be cut 

and sewn into furniture upholstery 

covers under FTZ procedures. The 

finished upholstery covers (HTSUS 

9401.90; duty free) would then be 

assembled into finished sofas, 

sectionals, loveseats, chairs, and 

recliners manufactured by Best Home at 

its Indiana facilities. 

The proposed scope of authority 

under FTZ procedures would only 

involve duty savings on foreign-origin, 

micro-denier suede fabrics (classified 

under HTSUS Headings 5407, 5512, 

5515, 5516, 5903, 5906, 6001, 6005, 

6006; duty rate range: 2.7–17.2%) 

finished with a caustic soda wash 

process, which the applicant indicates 

are not produced by U.S. mills. The 

application indicates that Best Home 

does not seek FTZ benefits on any of the 

other foreign fabrics the company uses 

in production at the facilities (i.e., full 

duties would be paid on all such 

fabrics). All other material inputs used 

in the proposed manufacturing activity 

would be domestic status. 

FTZ procedures would exempt Best 

Home from customs duty payments on 

the foreign micro-denier suede fabric 

used in export production. On microdenier suede fabric used in production 

for the U.S. market, the company could 

elect the finished upholstery cover (i.e., 

furniture part) duty rate (free) after the 

fabric has been cut, sewn, and formed 

into upholstery covers, at which time 

they are entered for consumption from 

the zone. Best Home would also have 

the option to elect the finished furniture 

duty rate (free) for the subject fabric 

when the finished furniture is entered 

for domestic consumption. The 

application indicates that the savings 

from FTZ procedures would help 

improve the facilities’ international 

competitiveness. 

In accordance with the Board’s 

regulations, Pierre V. Duy of the FTZ 

Staff is designated examiner to evaluate 

and analyze the facts and information 

presented in the application and case 

record and to report findings and 

recommendations to the Board. 

Public comment is invited from 

interested parties. Submissions (original 

and 3 copies) shall be addressed to the 

Board’s Executive Secretary at the 

address below. The closing period for 

receipt of comments is May 23, 2011. 

Rebuttal comments in response to 

material submitted during the foregoing 

period may be submitted during the 

subsequent 15-day period to June 6, 

2011. 

A copy of the application will be 

available for public inspection at the 

Office of the Executive Secretary, 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 2111, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20230–0002, and in the ‘‘Reading 

Room’’ section of the Board’s Web site, 

which is accessible via http:// 

www.trade.gov/ftz. 

For further information, contact Pierre 

V. Duy at Pierre.Duy@trade.gov or (202) 

482–1378. 

Dated: March 17, 2011. 

Pierre V. Duy, 

Acting Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2011–6882 Filed 3–22–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–909] 

Certain Steel Nails From the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results of the 

First Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On September 15, 2010, the 

Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) published the 

Preliminary Results of the first 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain steel 

nails (‘‘steel nails’’) from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).1 We gave 

interested parties an opportunity to 

comment on the Preliminary Results. 

Based upon our analysis of the 

comments and information received, we 

made changes to the margin calculations 

for the final results of this review. The 

final weighted-average margins are 

listed below in the ‘‘Final Results of the 

Review’’ section of this notice. The 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
16380 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2011 / Notices 

2See Dorbest Ltd. v. United States, 604 F.3d 1363 

(Fed. Cir. 2010) (‘‘Dorbest’’). 

3See Memorandum to the file through James C. 

Doyle, Office 9 Director, and Alex Villanueva, 

Office 9 Program Manager, from Emeka 

Chukwudebe, Office 9 Case Analyst, dated October 

21, 2010, First Administrative Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Steel Nails 

from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’): 

Industry-Specific Wage Rate Selection (‘‘Wage Rate 

Memo’’). 

4The Stanley Works (Langfang) Fastening 

Systems Co., Ltd. (‘‘Stanley Langfang’’), the Stanley 

Works/Stanley Fastening Systems LP (‘‘Stanley 

Works’’), and an unaffiliated wire drawing 

subcontractor are collectively referred to as 

‘‘Stanley’’ in this administrative review. 

5Mid Continent Nail Corporation. 

6The following companies filed combined case 

briefs: Itochu Building Products Co., Inc.; Chiieh 

Yung Metal Ind. Corp. (‘‘Chiieh Yung’’); Certified 

Products International Inc. (‘‘CPI’’); Huanghua Jinhai 

Hardware Products Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Jinghai County 

Hongli Industry & Business Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Jinchi; 

Shandong Dinglong Import & Export Co., Ltd.; 

Tianjin Zhonglian Metals Ware Co., Ltd.; Beijing 

Daruixing Nail Products Co., Ltd.; Hengshui 

Mingyao Hardware & Mesh Products Huanghua 

Xionghua Hardware Products Co., Ltd; Wintime 

Import & Export Corporation Limited of Zhongshan; 

Shanghai Jade Shuttle Hardware Tools Co., Ltd.; 

Romp (Tianjin) Hardware Co., Ltd.; China Staple 

Enterprise (Tianjin) Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Jurun Metal 

Products Co., Ltd. (‘‘Tianjin Jurun’’); Wuhu Shijie 

Hardware Co., Ltd. (‘‘Wuhu Shijie’’); Yitian Nanjing; 

Shanghai Chengkai Hardware Products Co., Ltd.; 

Tianjin Port Free Trade Zone Xiangtong 

International Industry & Trade Corp.; Tianjin 

Longxing (Group) Huanyu IMP. & EXP. Co., Ltd.; 

Dagang Zhitong Metal Products Co., Ltd.; Tianjin 

Shenyuan Steel Producting Group Co., Ltd.; Hebei 

Super Star Pneumatic Nails Co., Ltd.; Shaoxing 

Chengye Metal Producting Group Co., Ltd.; Tianjin 

Chentai International Trading Co., Ltd.; Qidong 

Liang Chyuan Metal Industry Co., Ltd.; CYM 

(Nanjing) Ningquan Nail Manufacture Co., Ltd., 

a.k.a. CYM (Nanjing) Nail Manufacture Co., Ltd.; 

and Shanghai Yueda Nails Industry Co., Ltd. a.k.a. 

Shanghai Yueda Nails Co., Ltd. (collectively, 

‘‘Itochu et al.’’); Shanghai Tengyu Hardware Tools 

Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Curvet Hardware Products 

Co. Ltd. (collectively, ‘‘Tengyu and Curvet’’); 

Nanjing Yuechang Hardware Co., Ltd. (‘‘Nanjing 

Yuechang’’); and Shandong Oriental Cherry 

Hardware Group Co., Ltd., Shandong Oriental 

Cherry Hardware Import and Export Co., Ltd., and 

Jining Huarong Hardware Products Co., Ltd. 

(collectively, ‘‘Oriental Cherry Group’’). 

7Those companies are: Besco Machinery Industry 

(Zhejiang) Co., Ltd.; CPI; CYM (Nanjing) Nail 

Manufacture Co., Ltd.; Dagang Zhitong Metal 

Products Co., Ltd.; Hebei Super Star Pneumatic 

Nails Co., Ltd.; Hong Kong Yu Xi Co., Ltd.; SencoXingya Metal Products (Taicang) Co., Ltd.; Shanghai 

Chengkai Hardware Product Co., Ltd.; Shanghai 

March Import & Export Company Ltd.; Shaoxing 

Chengye Metal Producting Co., Ltd.; Suzhou 

Yaotian Metal Products Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Chentai 

International Trading Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Jurun; 

Tianjin Longxing (Group) Huanyu Imp. & Exp. Co., 

Ltd.; Tianjin Port Free Trade Zone Xiangtong Intl. 

Industry & Trade Corp.; Tianjin Shenyuan Steel 

Producting Group Co., Ltd.; Wuhu Shijie; and Wuxi 

Chengye Metal Products Co., Ltd. 

8See Preliminary Results, 75 FR at 56071–56072; 

see also Memorandum to James C. Doyle, Office 9 

Director, through Alex Villanueva, Office 9 Program 

Manager, from Matthew Renkey, Senior Case 

Analyst and Emeka Chukwudebe, Case Analyst, 

First Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of 

Certain Steel Nails From the Peoples’ Republic of 

China (‘‘PRC’’): Partial Rescission of the First 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, dated 

September 7, 2010. 

9See, e.g., Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Partial Rescission, 73 FR 15479, 15480 (March 24, 

2008). 

10See I&D Memo at Comment 2 and the companyspecific analysis memoranda. 

period of review (‘‘POR’’) is January 23, 

2008, through July 31, 2009. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 23, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Emeka Chukwudebe or Matthew 

Renkey, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, 

Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–0219 or (202) 482– 

2312, respectively. 

Case History 

On September 15, 2010, the 

Department published the Preliminary 

Results of this administrative review. 

On October 7, 2010, we sent a 

supplemental questionnaire to separaterate respondent Yitian Nanjing 

Hardware Co., Ltd. (‘‘Yitian Nanjing’’). 

On October 12, 2010, one of the 

individually-reviewed respondents who 

had received a calculated rate at the 

Preliminary Results, Shandong 

Minmetal Co., Ltd. (‘‘Shandong 

Minmetal’’), informed the Department 

that it would not participate in 

verification and withdrew from the 

administrative review. On October 20, 

2010, we confirmed with counsel for 

Yitian Nanjing that a response to the 

Department’s supplemental 

questionnaire was not filed by the 

stipulated deadline. On October 21, 

2010, following the decision in 

Dorbest,2 the Department placed wage 

rate data on the record for comment.3

The Department conducted verification 

of: (1) Tianjin Jinchi Metal Products Co., 

Ltd. (‘‘Tianjin Jinchi’’) on November 12, 

2010; (2) Stanley’s 4 PRC offices and 

factory from November 15, 2010, 

through November 17, 2010; (3) a wiredrawing subcontractor for Stanley from 

November 18, 2010, through November 

19, 2010; and (4) Stanley’s U.S. office 

from December 14, 2010, through 

December 16, 2010. We invited 

interested parties to comment on the 

Preliminary Results. Between November 

3, 2010, and January 25, 2011, we 

received case and rebuttal briefs from 

Petitioner,5 one individually-reviewed 

respondent, Stanley, and other 

interested parties 6 in this 

administrative review. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs by parties are addressed 

in the ‘‘Certain Steel Nails from the 

People’s Republic of China: Issues and 

Decision Memorandum for the Final 

Results of the First Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review,’’ dated 

concurrently with this notice (‘‘I&D 

Memo’’), which is hereby adopted by 

this notice. A list of the issues which 

parties raised, and to which we 

responded in the I&D Memo, is attached 

to this notice as an Appendix. The I&D 

Memo is a public document and is on 

file in the Central Records Unit (‘‘CRU’’), 

Main Commerce Building, Room 7046, 

and is accessible on the Department’s 

Web site at http://www.trade.gov/ia. The 

paper copy and electronic version of the 

memorandum are identical in content. 

Final Partial Rescission of 

Administrative Review 

In the Preliminary Results, the 

Department announced its intent to 

rescind the review with respect to 

certain companies 7 that certified they 

made no shipments of subject 

merchandise during the POR.8 For the 

final results, we continue to find that 

these companies did not make 

shipments during the POR. Thus, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), 

and consistent with our practice,9 we 

are rescinding this review with respect 

to these companies. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record, 

verification, as well as comments 

received from parties regarding our 

Preliminary Results, we have made 

certain changes to the margin 

calculations. Specifically, we have 

updated the calculation for labor and 

several surrogate values used in the 

Preliminary Results.10 We also revised 

our labor wage rate methodology. See 

the ‘‘Wage Rate Methodology’’ section 

below. For all changes to the 

calculations, see the I&D Memo and 

company-specific analysis memoranda. 

For changes to the surrogate values, see 

‘‘Memorandum to the File, through Alex 

Villanueva, Program Manager, AC/CVD 

Operations, Office 9, from Emeka 

Chukwudebe, case analyst, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 9, First Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review of Certain 

Steel Nails from the People’s Republic 

of China: Surrogate Values for the Final 

Results,’’ dated concurrently with this 

notice. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the order 

includes certain steel nails having a 

shaft length up to 12 inches. Certain 

steel nails include, but are not limited 

to, nails made of round wire and nails 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2011 / Notices 16381 

11See, e.g., Preliminary Determination of Sales at 

Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final 

Determination: Coated Free Sheet Paper From the 

People’s Republic of China, 72 FR 30758, 30760 

(June 4, 2007), unchanged in Final Determination 

of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Coated Free Sheet 

Paper From the People’s Republic of China, 72 FR 

60632 (October 25, 2007). 

12See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at 

Less Than Fair Value: Sparklers From the People’s 

Republic of China, 56 FR 20588 (May 6, 1991), as 

further developed in Notice of Final Determination 

of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Silicon Carbide 

From the People’s Republic of China, 59 FR 22585 

(May 2, 1994). 

13Those companies are: (1) Aironware (Shanghai) 

Co., Ltd.; (2) Chiieh Yung Metal Ind. Corp.; (3) 

China Staple Enterprise (Tianjin) Co., Ltd.; (4) 

Dezhou Hualude Hardware Products Co., Ltd.; (5) 

Faithful Engineering Products Co., Ltd.; (6) 

Hengshui Mingyao Hardware & Mesh Products Co., 

Ltd.; (7) Huanghua Jinhai Hardware Products Co., 

Ltd.; (8) Huanghua Xionghua Hardware Products 

Co., Ltd.; (9) Jisco Corporation (‘‘Jisco’’); (10) Koram 

Panagene Co., Ltd. (‘‘Koram Panagene’’); (11) 

Nanjing Yuechang Hardware Co., Ltd.; (12) Qidong 

Liang Chyuan Metal Industry Co., Ltd.; (13) 

Qingdao D & L Group Ltd.; (14) Romp (Tianjin) 

Hardware Co., Ltd.; (15) Shandong Dinglong Import 

& Export Co., Ltd.; (16) Shanghai Jade Shuttle 

Hardware Tools Co., Ltd.; (17) Shouguang Meiqing 

Nail Industry Co., Ltd.; (18) Tianjin Jinchi Metal 

Products Co., Ltd.; (19) Tianjin Jinghai County 

Hongli Industry & Business Co., Ltd.; (20) Tianjin 

Zhonglian Metals Ware Co., Ltd.; (21) Wintime 

Import & Export Corporation Limited of Zhongshan; 

and (22) Zhejiang Gem-Chun Hardware Accessory 

Co., Ltd. (collectively, ‘‘Separate-Rate Applicants’’). 

14See section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act. 

15See I&D Memo at Comment 13. 

16See id. 

that are cut. Certain steel nails may be 

of one piece construction or constructed 

of two or more pieces. Certain steel nails 

may be produced from any type of steel, 

and have a variety of finishes, heads, 

shanks, point types, shaft lengths and 

shaft diameters. Finishes include, but 

are not limited to, coating in vinyl, zinc 

(galvanized, whether by electroplating 

or hot-dipping one or more times), 

phosphate cement, and paint. Head 

styles include, but are not limited to, 

flat, projection, cupped, oval, brad, 

headless, double, countersunk, and 

sinker. Shank styles include, but are not 

limited to, smooth, barbed, screw 

threaded, ring shank and fluted shank 

styles. Screw-threaded nails subject to 

this proceeding are driven using direct 

force and not by turning the fastener 

using a tool that engages with the head. 

Point styles include, but are not limited 

to, diamond, blunt, needle, chisel and 

no point. Finished nails may be sold in 

bulk, or they may be collated into strips 

or coils using materials such as plastic, 

paper, or wire. Certain steel nails 

subject to this proceeding are currently 

classified under the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States 

(‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings 7317.00.55, 

7317.00.65 and 7317.00.75. 

Excluded from the scope of this 

proceeding are roofing nails of all 

lengths and diameter, whether collated 

or in bulk, and whether or not 

galvanized. Steel roofing nails are 

specifically enumerated and identified 

in ASTM Standard F 1667 (2005 

revision) as Type I, Style 20 nails. Also 

excluded from the scope of this 

proceeding are corrugated nails. A 

corrugated nail is made of a small strip 

of corrugated steel with sharp points on 

one side. Also excluded from the scope 

of this proceeding are fasteners suitable 

for use in powder-actuated hand tools, 

not threaded and threaded, which are 

currently classified under HTSUS 

7317.00.20 and 7317.00.30. Also 

excluded from the scope of this 

proceeding are thumb tacks, which are 

currently classified under HTSUS 

7317.00.10.00. Also excluded from the 

scope of this proceeding are certain 

brads and finish nails that are equal to 

or less than 0.0720 inches in shank 

diameter, round or rectangular in cross 

section, between 0.375 inches and 

2.5 inches in length, and that are 

collated with adhesive or polyester film 

tape backed with a heat seal adhesive. 

Also excluded from the scope of this 

proceeding are fasteners having a case 

hardness greater than or equal to 

50 HRC, a carbon content greater than 

or equal to 0.5 percent, a round head, 

a secondary reduced-diameter raised 

head section, a centered shank, and a 

smooth symmetrical point, suitable for 

use in gas-actuated hand tools. 

While the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

scope of this proceeding is dispositive. 

Non-Market Economy Treatment 

The Department considers the PRC to 

be a non-market economy (‘‘NME’’) 

country.11 In accordance with section 

771(18)(C)(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (‘‘Act’’), any determination that 

a foreign country is an NME country 

shall remain in effect until revoked by 

the administering authority. No party 

has challenged the designation of the 

PRC as an NME country in this review. 

Therefore, the Department continues to 

treat the PRC as an NME country for 

purposes of these final results. 

Surrogate Country 

In the Preliminary Results, the 

Department stated that it selected India 

as the appropriate surrogate country to 

use in this administrative review for the 

following reasons: (1) It is a significant 

producer of comparable merchandise; 

(2) it is at a similar level of economic 

development pursuant to section 

773(c)(4) of the Act; and (3) the 

Department has reliable data from India 

that it can use to value the factors of 

production. As no party submitted 

additional comments challenging our 

selection of the primary surrogate 

country, we are continuing to use India 

as the surrogate country for the final 

results of this administrative review. 

Wage Rate Methodology 

Pursuant to Dorbest, we have 

calculated a revised hourly wage rate to 

use in valuing Stanley’s reported labor. 

The revised wage rate is calculated by 

averaging earnings and/or wages in 

countries that are economically 

comparable to the PRC and that are 

significant producers of comparable 

merchandise, pursuant to section 773 of 

the Act. See I&D Memo at Comment 2. 

Separate Rates 

In proceedings involving NME 

countries, the Department holds a 

rebuttable presumption that all 

companies within the country are 

subject to government control and, thus, 

should be assessed a single antidumping 

duty rate. It is the Department’s policy 

to assign all exporters of subject 

merchandise in an NME country this 

single rate unless an exporter can 

demonstrate that it is sufficiently 

independent so as to be entitled to a 

separate rate.12

In the Preliminary Results, we 

determined that in addition to the 

mandatory respondents, Stanley and 

Shandong Minmetal, the Separate-Rate 

Applicants also met the criteria for 

separate rate status.13 Since the 

publication of the Preliminary Results, 

Shandong Minmetal withdrew from the 

review. Therefore, the Department has, 

as adverse facts available (‘‘AFA’’), 

treated Shandong Minmetal as part of 

the PRC-wide entity.14 Moreover, we 

note that the information that 

Shangdong Minmetal provided to the 

Department to demonstrate the absence 

of de facto and de jure control could not 

be verified due to its failure to 

cooperate. Consequently we have not 

granted Shandong Minmetal a separate 

rate.15

The separate rate is determined based 

on the estimated weighted-average 

antidumping margins established for 

exporters and producers individually 

investigated, excluding zero and de 

minimis margins or margins based 

entirely on AFA.16 In this 

administrative review, one mandatory 

respondent, Stanley, has an estimated 

weighted-average antidumping margin 

which is above de minimis and which 

is not based on total AFA. Therefore, 

because there is only one relevant 

weighted-average antidumping margin 

for these final results, we have assigned 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
16382 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2011 / Notices 

17See, e.g., Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 73 FR 47587, 47591 

(August 14, 2008). 

18See I&D Memo at Comment 13. 

Stanley’s margin, which is 

13.90 percent, to the separate-rate 

companies.17

PRC–Wide Entity 

In the Preliminary Results, the 

Department determined that certain PRC 

exporters subject to this review failed to 

recertify their separate rates using the 

separate rate certification provided at 

the Department’s Web site at http:// 

ia.ita.doc.gov/nme/nme-sep-rate.html to 

demonstrate their continued eligibility 

for separate-rate status. Thus, the 

Department treated these PRC exporters 

as part of the PRC-wide entity. The 

Department also found that the PRCwide entity did not respond to our 

requests for information.18 As the PRCwide entity did not provide the 

Department with requested information, 

pursuant to section 776(a)(2)(A) of the 

Act, we continue to treat such entities 

as part of the PRC-wide entity. 

Final Results of the Review 

The weighted-average dumping 

margins for the POR are as follows: 

Exporter 

Weighted 

average 

margin 

(percent) 

(1) Stanley ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 13.90 

(2) Aironware (Shanghai) Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................................ 13.90 

(3) Chiieh Yung Metal Ind. Corp ............................................................................................................................................................... 13.90 

(4) China Staple Enterprise (Tianjin) Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................................... 13.90 

(5) Dezhou Hualude Hardware Products Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................................... 13.90 

(6) Faithful Engineering Products Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................................ 13.90 

(7) Hengshui Mingyao Hardware & Mesh Products Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................... 13.90 

(8) Huanghua Jinhai Hardware Products Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................................... 13.90 

(9) Huanghua Xionghua Hardware Products Co., Ltd .............................................................................................................................. 13.90 

(10) Jisco Corporation ............................................................................................................................................................................... 13.90 

(11) Koram Panagene Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................................................. 13.90 

(12) Nanjing Yuechang Hardware Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................... 13.90 

(13) Qidong Liang Chyuan Metal Industry Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................................. 13.90 

(14) Qingdao D & L Group Ltd .................................................................................................................................................................. 13.90 

(15) Romp (Tianjin) Hardware Co., Ltd ..................................................................................................................................................... 13.90 

(16) Shandong Dinglong Import & Export Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................... 13.90 

(17) Shanghai Jade Shuttle Hardware Tools Co., Ltd .............................................................................................................................. 13.90 

(18) Shouguang Meiqing Nail Industry Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................................ 13.90 

(19) Tianjin Jinchi Metal Products Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................... 13.90 

(20) Tianjin Jinghai County Hongli Industry & Business Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................. 13.90 

(21) Tianjin Zhonglian Metals Ware Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................ 13.90 

(22) Wintime Import & Export Corporation Limited of Zhongshan ............................................................................................................ 13.90 

(23) Zhejiang Gem-Chun Hardware Accessory Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................... 13.90 

(24) PRC-wide Entity ................................................................................................................................................................................. 118.04 

The following companies are not 

eligible for a separate rate and will be 

considered part of the PRC-wide entity: 

Exporter 

(1) Shandong Minmetal. 

(2) Beijing Daruixing Global Trading Co., Ltd. 

(3) Beijing Tri-Metal Co., Ltd. 

(4) Beijing Yonghongsheng Metal Products 

Co., Ltd. 

(5) Cana (Tiajin) Hardware Ind., Co., Ltd. 

(6) China Silk Trading & Logistics Co., Ltd. 

(7) Chongqing Hybest Nailery Co., Ltd. 

(8) Dingzhou Ruili Nail Production Co. Ltd. 

(9) Dong’e Fuqiang Metal Products Co., Ltd. 

(10) Haixing Hongda Hardware Production 

Co., Ltd. 

(11) Haixing Linhai Hardware Products Factory. 

(12) Handuk Industrial Co., Ltd. 

(13) Hilti (China) Limited. 

(14) Huadu Jin Chuan Manufactory Co., Ltd. 

(15) Huanghua Huarong Hardware Products 

Co., Ltd. 

(16) Huanghua Jinhai Metal Products Co., 

Ltd. 

(17) Huanghua Shenghua Hardware Manufactory Factory. 

Exporter 

(18) Huanghua Xinda Nail Production Co., 

Ltd. 

(19) Huanghua Yufutai Hardware Products 

Co., Ltd. 

(20) Jinding Metal Products Ltd. 

(21) Joto Enterprise Co., Ltd. 

(22) Kyung Dong Corp. 

(23) Maanshan Longer Nail Product Co., Ltd. 

(24) Nanjing Dayu Pneumatic Gun Nails Co., 

Ltd. 

(25) Qingdao Denarius Manufacture Co. Limited 

(26) Qingdao International Fastening Systems Inc. 

(27) Qingdao Sino-Sun International Trading 

Company Limited 

(28) Qingyuan County Hongyi Hardware 

Products Factory. 

(29) Qingyun Hongyi Hardware Factory. 

(30) Rizhao Changxing Nail-Making Co., Ltd. 

(31) Rizhao Handuk Fasteners Co., Ltd. 

(32) Rizhao Qingdong Electric Appliance Co., 

Ltd. 

(33) Shandong Minimetals Co., Ltd. 

(34) Shandong Oriental Cherry Hardware 

Group, Ltd. 

Exporter 

(35) Shanghai Curvet Hardware Products 

Co., Ltd. 

(36) Shanghai Nanhui Jinjun Hardware Factory. 

(37) Shanghai Tengyu Hardware Tools Co., 

Ltd. 

(38) Sinochem Tianjin Imp & Exp Shenzhen 

Corp. 

(39) Tianjin Baisheng Metal Products Co., 

Ltd. 

(40) Tianjin Bosai Hardware Tools Co., Ltd. 

(41) Tianjin City Dagang Area Jinding Metal 

Products Factory. 

(42) Tianjin City Daman Port Area Jinding 

Metal Products .Factory 

(43) Tianjin City Jinchi Metal Products Co., 

Ltd. 

(44) Tianjin Dagang Dongfu Metallic Products 

Co., Ltd. 

(45) Tianjin Dagang Hewang Nail Factory. 

(46) Tianjin Dagang Hewang Nails Manufacture Plant. 

(47) Tianjin Dagang Huasheng Nailery Co., 

Ltd. 

(48) Tianjin Dagang Jingang Nail Factory. 

(49) Tianjin Dagang Jingang Nails Manufacture Plant. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2011 / Notices 16383 

19The gap period represents the period of time 

after the expiration of the 180-day provisional 

measures period during the original investigation, 

to the day prior to the U.S. International Trade 

Commission’s final determination. In the instant 

case, the gap period is July 22, 2008, to July 24, 

2008. 

Exporter 

(50) Tianjin Dagang Linda Metallic Products 

Co., Ltd. 

(51) Tianjin Dagang Longhua Metal Products 

Plant. 

(52) Tianjin Dagang Shenda Metal Products 

Co., Ltd. 

(53) Tianjin Dagang Yate Nail Co., Ltd. 

(54) Tianjin Foreign Trade (Group) Textile & 

Garment Co., Ltd. 

(55) Tianjin Hewang Nail Making Factory. 

(56) Tianjin Huapeng Metal Company. 

(57) Tianjin Huachang Metal Products Co., 

Ltd. 

(58) Tianjin Huasheng Nails Production Co., 

Ltd. 

(59) Tianjin Jieli Hengyuan Metallic Products 

Co., Ltd. 

(60) Tianjin Jietong Hardware Products Co., 

Ltd. 

(61) Tianjin Jietong Metal Products Co., Ltd. 

(62) Tianjin Jin Gang Metal Products Co., 

Ltd. 

(63) Tianjin Jishili Hardware Co., Ltd. 

(64) Tianjin JLHY Metal Products Co., Ltd. 

(65) Tianjin Kunxin Hardware Co., Ltd. 

(66) Tianjin Kunxin Metal Products Co., Ltd. 

(67) Tianjin Linda Metal Company 

(68) Tianjin Qichuan Metal Products Co., Ltd. 

(69) Tianjin Ruiji Metal Products Co., Ltd. 

(70) Tianjin Shishun Metal Product Co., Ltd. 

(71) Tianjin Shishun Metallic Products Co., 

Ltd. 

(72) Tianjin Xiantong Fucheng Gun Nail Manufacture Co., Ltd. 

(73) Tianjin Xinyuansheng Metal Products 

Co., Ltd. 

(74) Tianjin Yihao Metallic Products Co., Ltd. 

(75) Tianjin Yongchang Metal Product Co., 

Ltd. 

(76) Tianjin Yongxu Metal Products Co., Ltd. 

(77) Tianjin Yongyi Standard Parts Production Co., Ltd. 

(78) Unicatch Industrial Co., Ltd. 

(79) Wuqiao County Huifeng Hardware Products Factory. 

(80) Wuqiao County Xinchuang Hardware 

Products Factory. 

(81) Wuqiao Huifeng Hardware Production 

Co., Ltd. 

(82) Wuxi Baolin Nail-Making Machinery Co., 

Ltd. 

(83) Wuxi Qiangye Metalwork Production 

Co., Ltd. 

(84) Zhangjiagang Longxiang Packing Materials Co., Ltd. 

(85) Zhongshan Junlong Nail Manufactures 

Co., Ltd. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuance of the final results, the 

Department will determine, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries. The Department 

intends to issue assessment instructions 

to CBP 15 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of 

review, excluding any reported sales 

that entered during the gap period.19

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we 

will calculate importer-specific (or 

customer-specific) ad valorem duty 

assessment rates based on the ratio of 

the total amount of the dumping 

margins calculated for the examined 

sales to the total entered value of those 

same sales. In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate, without regard to 

antidumping duties, all entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR for 

which the importer-specific assessment 

rate is zero or de minimis. For the 

companies receiving a separate rate that 

were not selected for individual review, 

we will calculate an assessment rate 

based on the simple average of the cash 

deposit rates calculated for the 

companies selected for individual 

review pursuant to section 735(c)(5)(B) 

of the Act. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of these final results of 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date, as provided for by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the 

exporters listed above, the cash deposit 

rate will be established in the final 

results of this review (except, if the rate 

is zero or de minimis, i.e., less than 0.5 

percent, no cash deposit will be 

required for that company); (2) for 

previously investigated or reviewed PRC 

and non-PRC exporters not listed above 

that have separate rates, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

exporter-specific rate published for the 

most recent period; (3) for all PRC 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not been found to be entitled to a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the PRC-wide rate of 118.04 percent; 

and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of 

subject merchandise which have not 

received their own rate, the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate applicable to the 

PRC exporters that supplied that nonPRC exporter. These deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Reimbursement of Duties 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) 

to file a certificate regarding the 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

prior to liquidation of the relevant 

entries during this POR. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Department’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties has occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of doubled antidumping 

duties. 

Administrative Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return/destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

administrative review and notice in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: March 14, 2011. 

Kim Glas, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

Appendix I—Issues & Decision 

Memorandum 

General Issues 

Comment 1: Cash Deposit and Liquidation 

Instructions 

Comment 2: Labor Rate Methodology 

Comment 3: Surrogate Financial Ratios 

Comment 4: Steel Wire Rod Surrogate Value 

Comment 5: Electricity Surrogate Value 

Comment 6: Other Surrogate Values 

A. Copper Coated Steel Welding Wire 

B. Coatings 

C. Glass Balls 

D. Sodium Hydroxide 

E. Sodium Sulfate 

F. Plastic Cores 

G. Labels 

H. Shrink Film 

I. Borax 

J. Cardboard Trays 

Comment 7: Zeroing 

Company-Specific Issues 

Separate Rate Respondents 

Comment 8: Rate for Separate Rate 

Respondents 

CPI 

Comment 9: Entries Incorrectly Attributed to 

CPI 

Tengyu and Curvet 

Comment 10: Rate for Final Results 

Rizhao and Wuxi Qiangye 

Comment 11: Rate for Final Results 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
16384 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2011 / Notices 

1See Notice of Amended Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping 

Duty Order: Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, 70 FR 5152 

(February 1, 2005) (‘‘Order’’). 

Chiieh Yung, Jisco, and Koram Panagene 

Comment 12: Withdrawal of Review Request 

Shandong Minmetal 

Comment 13: Application of Total Adverse 

Facts Available (‘‘AFA’’) 

Yitian Nanjing 

Comment 14: PRC-wide Rate 

Tianjin Shenyuan and Shaoxing Chengye 

Comment 15: Correction of Company Names 

Oriental Cherry Group 

Comment 16: Rate for Final Results 

Stanley 

Comment 17: Application of Total or Partial 

AFA 

Comment 18: Intermediate Input 

Methodology 

Comment 19: Indirect Selling Expenses 

[FR Doc. 2011–6728 Filed 3–22–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–552–802] 

Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

From the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam: Extension of Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty New 

Shipper Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) is extending the time 

limit for the preliminary results of the 

new shipper review of certain frozen 

warmwater shrimp (‘‘shrimp’’) from the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam 

(‘‘Vietnam’’). The period of review for 

this review is February 1, 2010, through 

July 31, 2010. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 23, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul 

Walker, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, 

Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 14th Street and 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0413. 

Background 

On October 1, 2010, the Department 

published a notice of initiation of the 

new shipper review in the antidumping 

duty order on shrimp from Vietnam for 

Quoc Viet Seaproducts Processing 

Trading and Import-Export Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Quoc Viet’’). See Certain Frozen 

Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist 

Republic of Vietnam: Initiation of 

Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review, 

75 FR 60730 (October 1, 2010). The 

preliminary results of this review are 

currently due no later than March 19, 

2011. 

Statutory Time Limits 

Section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’), and 

19 CFR 351.214(i)(1) require the 

Department to issue the preliminary 

results of a new shipper review within 

180 days after the date on which the 

new shipper review was initiated and 

final results within 90 days after the 

date on which the preliminary results 

are issued. However, the Department 

may extend the deadline for completion 

of the preliminary results of a new 

shipper review to 300 days if it 

determines that the case is 

extraordinarily complicated. See 19 CFR 

351.214(i)(2). 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results of Review 

The Department has determined that 

the review is extraordinarily 

complicated as the Department must 

issue, and analyze the responses to, 

additional supplemental questionnaires 

concerning Quoc Viet’s sales practices 

and its shrimp factors of production 

usage ratio. Moreover, the Department 

needs additional time to analyze the 

bona fide nature of Quoc Viet’s sale, 

which includes gathering data from U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection. Based 

on the timing of the case and the 

additional information that must be 

gathered, the preliminary results of this 

new shipper review cannot be 

completed within 180 days. 

Therefore, the Department is 

extending the time limit for completion 

of the preliminary results of this new 

shipper review by 26 days from the 

original March 19, 2011, deadline. The 

preliminary results will now be due no 

later than April 14, 2011. The final 

results continue to be due 90 days after 

the issuance of the preliminary results. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(2)(B)(iv) and 777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: March 16, 2011. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2011–6883 Filed 3–22–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–552–802] 

Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

From the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam: Initiation of Antidumping 

Duty New Shipper Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 23, 2011. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the ‘‘Department’’) has determined that 

a request for a new shipper review 

(‘‘NSR’’) of the antidumping duty order 

on certain frozen warmwater shrimp 

(‘‘shrimp’’) from the Socialist Republic 

of Vietnam (‘‘Vietnam’’), received on 

February 28, 2011, meets the statutory 

and regulatory requirements for 

initiation. The period of review (‘‘POR’’) 

for this NSR is February 1, 2010– 

January 31, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul 

Walker, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, 

Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 14th Street and 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: 202–482–0413. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The notice announcing the 

antidumping duty order on shrimp from 

Vietnam was published in the Federal 

Register on February 1, 2005.1 On 

February 28, 2011, pursuant to section 

751(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended (the ‘‘Act’’), and section 

351.214(c) of the Department’s 

regulations, the Department received a 

NSR request from Thong Thuan Seafood 

Co., Ltd. (‘‘Thong Thuan’’). Thong Thuan 

certified that it is a producer and 

exporter of the subject merchandise 

upon which the request was based. 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(I) of 

the Act and section 351.214(b)(2)(i) of 

the Department’s regulations, Thong 

Thuan certified that it did not export 

subject merchandise to the United 

States during the period of investigation 

(‘‘POI’’). In addition, pursuant to section 

751(a)(2)(B)(i)(II) of the Act and section 

351.214(b)(2)(iii)(A) of the Department’s 

regulations, Thong Thuan certified that, 

since the initiation of the investigation, 

it has never been affiliated with any 

Vietnamese exporter or producer who 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES