alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

EPA Region 9 SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

To evaluate compliance with 40 CFR 51, Appendix V

Submittal Date June 11, 2013

District Name South Coast AQMD

Date Reviewed June 11, 2013

EPA Reviewer R. Marinaro

Key:

C = Complete

I = Incomplete

N/A = Not Applicable To Rule

O = Material Missing

 

RULE #: 444 445

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (per Appendix V, Section 2.1)

(a) Submittal letter from Governor/designee C C

(b) Evidence of adoption C C

(c) State/District legal authority to adopt C C

(d1) Copy of actual rule/plan C C

(d2) Rule changes indicated by underline/cross-out C C

(e) Proof that action met procedural requirements C C

(f) Copy of public notice C C

(g) Certification that hearing fulfilled public notice C C

(h) Public comments & agency response C C

 

TECHNICAL SUPPORT (per Appendix V, Section 2.2)

(a) Regulated pollutants identified C C

(b) Affected sources & attainment status identified C C

(c) Rule/plan emissions impact C C

(d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration N/A N/A

(e) Modeling support as appropriate N/A N/A

(f) Reliance on continuous emission reductions C C

(g) Evidence of limits & other needed requirements N/A N/A

(i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy N/A N/A

OVERALL COMPLETENESS C C

Notes::
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 48 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 48

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed transfer to the 
      United Arab Emirates certain defense articles and services.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the issuance of an export 
license with respect to the following proposed exports to the United 
Arab Emirates is prohibited:
            (1) The transfer of the following defense articles, 
        including services and technical data, described in Executive 
        Communication 1420 (EC-1420) submitted to Congress pursuant to 
        section 36(c) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 
        2776(c)) and published in the Congressional Record on June 3, 
        2019: The proposed transfer of defense articles, defense 
        services, and technical data to support the export and 
        integration of 60,000 FMU-152A/B Joint Programmable Bomb Fuze 
        systems into the United Arab Emirates Armed Forces General 
        Headquarters' fleet of the following aircraft and associated 
        weapons: F-16, Mirage 2000, AT-802 Air Tractor and S2R-600 
        Archangel.

            Passed the Senate June 20, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. J. RES. 48

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed transfer to the 
      United Arab Emirates certain defense articles and services.
```
§ 42.2 Designation of Director of Equal Employment Opportunity and Complaint Adjudication Officer. ( a ) In compliance with the regulations of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (29 CFR 1613.204(c)), the Assistant Attorney General for Administration is hereby designated as Director of Equal Employment Opportunity for the Department of Justice with responsibilities for administration of the Equal Employment Opportunity Program within the Department. The Director of Equal Employment Opportunity shall publish and implement the Department of Justice regulations, which shall include a positive action program to eliminate causes of discrimination and shall include procedures for processing complaints of discrimination within the Department.
( b ) The Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Civil Rights Division shall appoint a Complaint Adjudication Officer, who shall render final decisions for the Department of Justice on complaints of discrimination filed by employees and applicants for employment in the Department pursuant to the Department's Equal Employment Opportunity Regulations. In rendering decisions, the Complaint Adjudication Officer shall order such remedial action as may be appropriate, whether or not there is a finding of discrimination, but in cases where no discrimination is found any remedial action ordered shall have the prior approval of the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Civil Rights Division, who shall consult with the Deputy Attorney General on the matter.
[Order No. 420-69, 34 FR 12281, July 25, 1969, as amended by Order No. 721-77, 42 FR 25725, May 19, 1977; Order No. 731-77, 42 FR 35646, July 11, 1977; Order No. 899-80, 45 FR 43703, June 30, 1980; Order No. 960-81, 46 FR 52357, Oct. 27, 1981]
#### § 552.32 Hostages.

Captive staff have no authority and their directives shall be disregarded.
§ 55.13 Language used for oral assistance and publicity. ( a ) *Languages with more than one dialect.* Some languages, for example, Chinese, have several dialects. Where a jurisdiction is obligated to provide oral assistance in such a language, the jurisdiction's obligation is to ascertain the dialects that are commonly used by members of the applicable language minority group in the jurisdiction and to provide oral assistance in such dialects. (See § 55.20.)
( b ) *Language minority groups having more than one language.* In some jurisdictions members of an applicable language minority group speak more than one language other than English. Where a jurisdiction is obligated to provide oral assistance in the language of such a group, the jurisdiction's obligation is to ascertain the languages that are commonly used by members of that group in the jurisdiction and to provide oral assistance in such languages. (See § 55.20)
[Order No. 655-76, 41 FR 29998, July 20, 1976, as amended by Order No. 1246-87, 53 FR 736, Jan. 12, 1988; Order No. 1752-93, 58 FR 35373, July 1, 1993]
#### § 76.1 Purpose.

This part implements section 6486 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 (the Act), 21 U.S.C. 844a. This part establishes procedures for imposing civil penalties against persons who knowingly possess a controlled substance for personal use that is listed in 21 CFR 1316.91(j)(2) in violation of 21 U.S.C. 844a and specifies the appeal rights of persons subject to a civil penalty pursuant to section 6486 of the Act.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Kelsey, Petty and Senior Judge Bumgardner

ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC. AND

ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY

MEMORANDUM OPINION *

v. Record No. 0872

- 11

- 4 PER CURIAM

AUGUST 30, 2011

JAMES ASHBY

FRO M THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

(Stephanie S. Ryan ; Ryan Law PLLC, on briefs), for appellants.

(Robert B. Guntharp ; Ritchie Law Firm, P.L.C., on brief), for

appellee.

Allied Waste Industries, Inc. and Zurich American Insurance Comp any appeal a decision of

the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that James Ashby’s claim was not barred by

willful misconduct. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that

this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affi rm for the reasons stated by the commission in

its final opinion. See Ashby v. Allied Waste Indust. , VWC File No. VA000

- 0006

- 9121 (Mar.

29, 2011). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1

- 403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1

- 413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
### §404c–3. Criminal offenses concerning hunting, fishing, and property; prima facie evidence; rules and regulations

All hunting or the killing, wounding, or capturing at any time of any wild bird or animal, except dangerous animals when it is necessary to prevent them from destroying human lives or inflicting personal injury, is prohibited within the limits of the park, nor shall any fish be taken out of any of the waters of the park, except at such seasons and at such times and in such manner as may be directed by the Secretary of the Interior. The Secretary of the Interior shall make and publish such general rules and regulations as he may deem necessary and proper for the management and care of the park and for the protection of the property therein, especially for the preservation from injury or spoliation of all timber, mineral deposits, natural curiosities, or wonderful objects within the park, and for the protection of the animals and birds in the park from capture or destruction, and to prevent their being frightened or driven from the park; and he shall make rules and regulations governing the taking of fish from the waters in the park. Possession within the park of the dead bodies or any part thereof of any wild bird or animal shall be prima facie evidence that the person or persons having the same are guilty of violating this Act. Any person or persons, stage or express company, railway or other transportation company, who knows or has reason to believe that such wild birds, fish, or animals were taken or killed contrary to the provisions of this Act or the rules and regulations promulgated by the Secretary of the Interior, and who receives for transportation the dead bodies or any part thereof of the wild birds, fish, or animals so taken or killed, or who shall violate any of the other provisions of this Act, or the rules and regulations, with reference to the management and care of the park, or for the protection of the property therein, for the preservation from injury or spoliation of timber, mineral deposits, natural curiosities, or wonderful objects within the park, or for the protection of the animals, birds, and fish in the park, or who shall within the park commit any damage, injury, or spoliation to or upon any building, fence, sign, hedge, gate, guidepost, tree, wood, underwood, timber, garden, crops, vegetables, plants, land, springs, mineral deposits, natural curiosities, or other matter or thing growing or being thereon, or situated therein, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be subject to a fine of not more than $500 or imprisonment not exceeding six months, or both, and be adjudged to pay all the costs of the proceedings.

(June 5, 1942, ch. 341, §3, 56 Stat. 317.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is act June 5, 1942, which is classified to sections 404c–1 to 404c–12 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Translog : Defensetransportation system bulletin.**
 
2008:SummerFall/Winter
2009:Spring/AlmanacSummerFall
2010:AlmanacSpring/Summer
 
SuDoc Number:D 101.66/2-2:
Item Number:0329-B
CGP systemNumber:000568451
 
February 6, 2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           43584
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 50648
<PP&E>                                           89942
<DEPRECIATION>                                    9418
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  957131
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           955415
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     127000
<COMMON>                                       1868511
<OTHER-SE>                                   (1993795)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    957131
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   100
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                544123
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (544023)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (544023)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (544023)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
### §410r–2. Lands acquired as part of park; rules and regulations

All lands and submerged lands title to which is accepted by the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to the provisions of section 410r–1 of this title shall, upon the acceptance of title thereto, become parts of the Everglades National Park and shall be subject to all laws and regulations applicable thereto.

(Pub. L. 86–681, §2, Sept. 2, 1960, 74 Stat. 577.)
§ 201.10 Guiding principles of law. ( a ) The Executive order of October 7, 2022 and its terms shall be interpreted by the DPRC exclusively in light of United States law and the United States legal tradition, and not any other source of law.
( b ) In a DPRC panel's review of an application under § 201.9, the DPRC panel shall be guided by relevant decisions of the United States Supreme Court in the same way as are courts established under Article III of the United States Constitution, including those decisions regarding appropriate deference to relevant determinations of national security officials.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00684

- CR
Nelson Garcia Delgado

v. The State of Texas
On Appeal from the 332nd District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. CR

- 5205

- 07

- F

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered th is cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. February 20, 2014
§ 30.10 How does the Attorney General make efforts to accommodate intergovernmental concerns? ( a ) If a state process provides a state process recommendation to the Department through its single point of contact, the Attorney General either: ( 1 ) Accepts the recommendation;
( 2 ) Reaches a mutually agreeable solution with the state process; or
( 3 ) Provides the single point of contact with a written explanation of the decision, in such form as the Attorney General in his or her discretion deems appropriate. The Attorney General may also supplement the written explanation by providing the explanation to the single point of contact by telephone, other telecommunication, or other means.
( b ) In any explanation under paragraph (a)(3) of this section, the Attorney General informs the single point of contact that: ( 1 ) The Department will not implement its decision for at least ten days after the single point of contact receives the explanation; or
( 2 ) The Attorney General has reviewed the decision and determined that, because of unusual circumstances, the waiting period of at least ten days is not feasible.
( c ) For purposes of computing the waiting period under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, a single point of contact is presumed to have received written notification five days after the date of mailing of such notification.
#### The Cadle Company, as Assignee of The First Women’s Bank, Respondent, v Court Living Corporation et al., Defendants. Linda E. Greco et al., Nonparty Appellants.

[823 NYS2d 401]

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Judith J. Gische, J.), entered October 4, 2005, which, to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiffs motion to enforce subpoenas pursuant to CFLR 5223 and denied appellants’ cross motions to quash said subpoenas, unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs.

It is undisputed that appellant Greco has appeared for deposition and provided the information sought from her as well as regarding her co-appellant, rendering the appeal moot *(see Matter of McMahon v Landon,*154 AD2d 745 [1989]). Appellants have failed adequately to explain how the circumstances fall within an exception to the mootness doctrine *(see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne,*50 NY2d 707, 714-715 [1980]). Concur— Mazzarelli, J.E, Friedman, Gonzalez, Catterson and Malone, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

                        CEO/CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Gyrodyne Company of America, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Stephen V. Maroney, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.


Date: February 18, 2009

                            /S/ Stephen V. Maroney
                            ----------------------
                            Stephen V. Maroney,
                            President, Chief Executive Officer
                            and Chief Financial Officer
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

EDDIE A. TIFFANY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D2024-1218

July 24, 2024

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for

Hillsborough County; Kimberly K. Fernandez, Judge.

Eddie A. Tiffany, pro se

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, KHOUZAM, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
#### § 701.14 Classified information.

In processing a request for information that is classified or classifiable under Executive Order 12356 or any other Executive Order concerning the classification of records, the Office shall review the information to determine whether it warrants classification. Information that does not warrant classification shall not be withheld from a requester on the basis of 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(1). The Office shall, upon receipt of any appeal involving classified or classifiable information, take appropriate action to ensure compliance with Executive Order 12356 or any other Executive Order concerning the classification of records.
§ 76.31 Standards of conduct. ( a ) All persons appearing in proceedings before a Judge are expected to act with integrity and in an ethical manner.
( b ) The Judge may exclude parties, witnesses, and their attorneys for refusal to comply with directions, continued use of dilatory tactics, refusal to adhere to reasonable standards of orderly and ethical conduct, failure to act in good faith, or violation of the prohibition against *ex parte* communications. The Judge shall state in the record the cause for suspending or barring an attorney from participation in a proceeding. Any attorney so suspended or barred may appeal to the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer for the District, or if there is no Chief Administrative Hearing Officer, to the Attorney General but no proceeding shall be delayed or suspended pending disposition of the appeal; provided, however, that the Judge shall suspend the proceeding for a reasonable time for the purpose of enabling the party to obtain another attorney.
§ 540.203 Written correspondence limitations. ( a ) *General correspondence.* General written correspondence as defined by this part, may be limited to six pieces of paper (not larger than 8.5 x 11 inches), double-sided writing permitted, once per calendar week, to and from a single recipient at the discretion of the Warden, except as stated in (c) below. This correspondence is subject to staff inspection for contraband and for content.
( b ) *Special mail.* ( 1 ) Special mail, as defined in this part, is limited to privileged communication with the inmate's attorney.
( 2 ) All such correspondence is subject to staff inspection in the inmate's presence for contraband and to ensure its qualification as privileged communication with the inmate's attorney. Inmates may not seal such outgoing mail before giving it to staff for processing. After inspection for contraband, the inmate must then seal the approved outgoing mail material in the presence of staff and immediately give the sealed material to the observing staff for further processing.
( c ) *Frequency and volume limitations.* Unless the quantity to be processed becomes unreasonable or the inmate abuses or violates these regulations, there is no frequency or volume limitation on written correspondence with the following entities: ( 1 ) U.S. courts;
( 2 ) Federal judges;
( 3 ) U.S. Attorney's Offices;
( 4 ) Members of U.S. Congress;
( 5 ) The Bureau of Prisons;
( 6 ) Other federal law enforcement entities; or
( 7 ) The inmate's attorney (privileged communications only).
( d ) Electronic messaging may be limited to two messages, per calendar week, to and from a single recipient at the discretion of the Warden.
### §5392. Prohibition of circumvention and prevention of conflicts of interest

#### (a) No other funding

Funds for the orderly liquidation of any covered financial company under this subchapter shall only be provided as specified under this subchapter.

#### (b) Limit on governmental actions

No governmental entity may take any action to circumvent the purposes of this subchapter.

#### (c) Conflict of interest

In the event that the Corporation is appointed receiver for more than 1 covered financial company or is appointed receiver for a covered financial company and receiver for any insured depository institution that is an affiliate of such covered financial company, the Corporation shall take appropriate action, as necessary to avoid any conflicts of interest that may arise in connection with multiple receiverships.

(Pub. L. 111–203, title II, §212, July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1516.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (b), was in the original "this title", meaning title II of Pub. L. 111–203, July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1442, which is classified principally to this subchapter. For complete classification of title II to the Code, see Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 1 day after July 21, 2010, except as otherwise provided, see section 4 of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 5301 of this title.