alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
We note that federal subject matter jurisdiction is premised on the parties’ diversity of 1

citizenship. 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Although defendants have not conceded that the amount-incontroversy requirement is met, neither have they challenged the good-faith basis for plaintiff’s

allegation that it is. 

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 10a0082n.06

No. 09-1065

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

MARK LEDERTOUG, an individual,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BOULEVARD & TRUMBULL TOWING, INC., 

a Delaware corporation; and OFFICIAL

TOWING, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

Defendants-Appellees.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT

COURT FOR THE EASTERN

DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

M E M O R A N D U M

O P I N I O N

BEFORE: MARTIN, ROGERS and McKEAGUE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. Plaintiff Mark Ledertoug appeals from the district court’s award of

summary judgment in favor of defendant towing companies. The action stems from the allegedly

wrongful removal, impoundment and eventual sale of Ledertoug’s tractor truck by defendants

Boulevard & Trumbull Towing, Inc., and Official Towing, Inc. for approximately $6000. The 1

towing companies had acted at the request of Home Depot USA, Inc., on whose property in

Roseville, Michigan, the truck had been parked for over a year. Ledertoug insists that he had Home

Depot’s consent to park his truck on its property and that his truck could not therefore be lawfully
No. 09-1065

Ledertoug v. Boulevard & Trumbull Towing, Inc.

Ledertoug’s complaint states claims against Home Depot as well. These claims were

2

voluntarily dismissed pursuant to a negotiated settlement before summary judgment was granted to

the towing companies. 

- 2 -

treated as an abandoned vehicle. Yet, as the district court observed in its summary judgment 2

opinion, Ledertoug conceded that discovery had produced no evidence that the towing companies

had acted other than in compliance with Michigan law. Accordingly, there being no evidence of a

breach of duty owed to Ledertoug by the towing companies, the district court held there was no

genuine issue of material fact and awarded judgment to the defendants on Ledertoug’s claims for

statutory violation, negligence and conversion. 

On appeal, Ledertoug has not raised any argument that is not fairly and adequately addressed

in the district court’s opinion. Although we review the district court’s ruling de novo, we find no

error. Accordingly, finding that a separate opinion would be duplicative and unnecessary, we hereby

AFFIRM the district court’s judgment on the basis of its opinion.
### §1603. National Forest System resource inventories; development, maintenance, and updating by Secretary as part of Assessment

As a part of the Assessment, the Secretary shall develop and maintain on a continuing basis a comprehensive and appropriately detailed inventory of all National Forest System lands and renewable resources. This inventory shall be kept current so as to reflect changes in conditions and identify new and emerging resources and values.

(Pub. L. 93–378, §5, formerly §4, Aug. 17, 1974, 88 Stat. 477, renumbered §5, Pub. L. 94–588, §2, Oct. 22, 1976, 90 Stat. 2949; amended Pub. L. 115–141, div. O, title II, §208(b)(2), Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1066.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–141 substituted "Secretary" for "Secretary of Agriculture".
Appendix J 

List of Preparers
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 99705 / March 11, 2024

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-18999

In the Matter of the Application of 

CANTONE RESEARCH INC.,

ANTHONY CANTONE,

and CHRISTINE CANTONE

For Review of Disciplinary Action Taken by 

FINRA

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ISSUE DECISION

The Commission has determined, in its discretion, that it is appropriate to extend by 90

days the period within which the decision in this matter may be issued. Accordingly, IT IS 

ORDERED that such period be, and hereby is, extended to June 10, 2024.

1

By the Commission.

Vanessa A. Countryman 

Secretary

1 June 9, 2024, is a Sunday.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 2194** 

DON BRADLEY WALLACE , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v. ENHANCED RECOVERY COMPANY, LLC , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Wilmington

. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 7:13

- cv - 00124

- FL )

Submitted : April 28, 2016 Decided: June 21, 2016

Before NIEMEYER and WYNN , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Don Bradley Wallace, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Stephen Gallagher, SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP, Jacksonville, Florida, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not b inding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Don Bradley Wallace appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint asserting claims under the Telephone Consumer Protect Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227 (2012). * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Schatz v. Rosenberg , 943 F.2d 485, 487 n.1 (4th Cir. 1991) (“We must review the district court ’ s decision on the same record as that before the district court

. ”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order, deny Wallace’s motions to supplement the record on appeal , to seal some of those documents, and to clarify , and deny the Appellee’s motion to strike portions of Wallace’s opening brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate ly presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Wallace abandoned in the district court the remaining claims asserted in the complaint

.
EXHIBIT 4.10

                                               May 7, 1999


Attn:  Christopher Ricci
Focus Enhancements, Inc.
600 North Road
Wilmington, MA 01887

Re:      Union Atlantic LC ("Union Atlantic")/Focus Enhancements, Inc. ("Focus")
         Agreement

Dear Chris:

         Per your  request,  I am writing to  document  our  understanding  with
respect  to  the   above-captioned   agreement   dated  December  12,  1998,  as
subsequently amended (the "Agreement"). The terms of the Agreement require Union
Atlantic to have an exclusive  relationship  with Focus for six months, or until
June 12, 1999, solely with respect to the sale of substantially all of the stock
or assets of Focus.  With respect to a minority equity  investment in Focus, the
relationship is non-exclusive.

         With  particular   regard  to  Focus'   relationship  with  JW  Genesis
Securities,  Inc.  ("JWG"),  it is agreed that the commissions  described in the
Agreement  shall be waived for any placement  through JWG.  Union  Atlantic will
seek  cash   compensation   for  any  such   transaction   directly   from  JWG.
Notwithstanding the foregoing,  upon closing of an equity placement through JWG,
Focus shall  issue to Union  Atlantic a purchase  warrant  for 25,000  shares of
Focus  common  stock at a per share  exercise  price not to exceed the per share
exercise  price of the  warrants  granted  to JWG/or the  equity  investor  with
respect to the subject equity investment.

         Should you have any question, please don't hesitate to call.

                                         Respectfully,

                                         /s/ Leonard Sokolow

                                         Leonard Sokolow
                                         Partner
Appendix E1 

Millennium Pipeline Project – Phase I
§ 551.23 Abortion. ( a ) The inmate has the responsibility to decide either to have an abortion or to bear the child.
( b ) The Warden shall offer to provide each pregnant inmate with medical, religious, and social counseling to aid her in making the decision whether to carry the pregnancy to full term or to have an elective abortion. If an inmate chooses to have an abortion, she shall sign a statement to that effect. The inmate shall sign a written statement acknowledging that she has been provided the opportunity for the counseling and information called for in this policy.
( c ) Upon receipt of the inmate's written statements required by paragraph (b) of this section, ordinarily submitted through the unit manager, the Clinical Director shall arrange for an abortion to take place.
[51 FR 47178, Dec. 30, 1986, as amended at 59 FR 62968, Dec. 6, 1994]
================================================================================

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


       In connection with the Annual Report of Amexdrug Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jack Amin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

       (1)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of the
              operation of the Company.


/s/ Jack Amin
-------------------------
Jack Amin
Chief Financial Officer
April 9, 2007












--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 1, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00714

- CV

ESTATE OF JOANNE COOKSEY FRIEND, DECEASED,

From the County Court, Uvalde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 6904

- 16

Honorable Polly Jackson Spencer, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellee’s motion for extension of time to file her brief is granted. We order appellee’s

brief due May 15, 2019.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 1st day of May, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
WASH YOUR HANDS 

CS 319651-A 08/12/2020

1 Wet

cdc.gov/coronavirus

2 Get Soap

3 Scrub for at 

least 20 seconds

4 Rinse

5 Dry
IIA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 41 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed export to the Government of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates and the United 

Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland of technical data and 

defense services. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 5, 2019 

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. PAUL, Mr. 

LEAHY, Mr. YOUNG, and Mr. REED) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign 

Relations 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed export to the Government of Saudi Arabia and the United 

Arab Emirates and the United Kingdom of Great Britain 

and Northern Ireland of technical data and defense services. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the issuance of an export license with respect to the 

4 following proposed export to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 

5 and United Arab Emirates is prohibited: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•SJ 41 IS 

1 (1) The transfer to the Kingdom of Saudi Ara2 bia and United Arab Emirates of the following li3 cense for export of technical data and defense serv4 ices, described in Executive Communication 1419 

5 (EC–1419) submitted to Congress pursuant to sec6 tion 36(c) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 

7 U.S.C. 2776(c)) and published in the Congressional 

8 Record on June 3, 2019: The proposed technical as9 sistance agreement providing technical data and de10 fense services to Saudi Arabia and United Arab 

11 Emirates in support of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 

12 Ministry of Defense Transformation Project. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HUMBERTO VALLIN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-73035

Agency No. A028-727-740

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 17, 2012** 

Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Humberto Vallin, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen based

on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. 

We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and review de

FILED

JUL 24 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-73035

novo claims of due process violations. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785,

791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Vallin’s motion to reopen on

the ground that he presented insufficient evidence to establish prejudice resulting

from the alleged errors of his former counsel. See Rojas-Garcia v. Ashcroft, 339

F.3d 814, 826 (9th Cir. 2003) (requiring prejudice to prevail on an ineffective

assistance claim).

In light of our disposition, we need not address Vallin’s remaining

contentions.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 131 (Tuesday, July 9, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 41013-41014]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-16392]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

42 CFR Parts 431

[CMS-1450-CN]
RIN 0938-AR52

Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Home Health Prospective Payment 
System Rate Update for CY 2014, Home Health Quality Reporting 
Requirements, and Cost Allocation of Home Health Survey Expenses 
Correction

AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects technical errors that appeared in the 
proposed rule with comment period titled ``Medicare and Medicaid 
Programs; Home Health Prospective Payment System Rate Update for CY 
2014, Home Health Quality Reporting Requirements, and Cost Allocation 
of Home Health Survey Expenses'' published on July 3, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elmer Barksdale, (410) 786-1943.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    In FR Doc. 2013-15766, published on Wednesday, July 3, 2013 (78 FR 
40272), there was an error that is identified and corrected in the 
Correction of Errors section below.

II. Summary of Errors

    In section ``VI.G. Accounting Statement and Table'' of the 
Regulatory Impact Analysis section, in the Transfers column of Table 
31, under the heading Medicare HH Survey & Certification Costs, we 
inadvertently made a typographical error when we listed the amount for 
the Annualized Monetized Transfers. Specifically, we stated that the 
amount was ``-$18.6 Million'' instead of ``$18.6 Million.''

IV. Correction of Errors

    In FR Doc. 2013-15766, published on July 3, 2013, on page 40308, in 
the Transfers column of Table 31, under the heading Medicare ``HH 
Survey & Certification Costs'', the amount ``-$18.6 Million'' is 
corrected to read ``$18.6 Million.''

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.773, 
Medicare--Hospital Insurance; and Program No. 93.774, Medicare--
Supplementary Medical Insurance Program)

[[Page 41014]]

    Dated: July 2, 2013.
Jennifer M. Cannistra,
Executive Secretary to the Department, Department of Health and Human 
Services.
[FR Doc. 2013-16392 Filed 7-3-13; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Contemporary  Solutions,
Inc.,  on Form  10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31,  2006 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the
undersigned, B. Stephen Bailey, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: June 9, 2006


/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
HEADS OF AGREEMENT

 This Agreement is entered into this 16th day of February, 2001 between Rotch Property Group Limited whose address is 18 Upper Grosvenor Street London WIX 9PB ("Rotch") and Harrell Hospitality Group, Inc whose address is 16475 North Dallas Parkway, Suite 410, Addison, Dallas Texas 75001 ("Harrell"), wherein the parties agree as follows:

The parties desire to enter into a strategic alliance, relative to the hotel acquisition, leasing, development and management activity of both parties, as they specifically relate to the UK and Europe, and, where appropriate, as they relate to the USA.

The parties agree:

1. 	Rotch will engage Harrell to provide hotel consulting, asset oversight, acquisition review, operational review, pre opening or pre takeover technical services and ongoing property management for Rotch.  

2. 	Harrell will refer to Rotch, any relevant hotel acquisition, leasing, workout or other opportunities that meet Rotch's criteria. 

3. 	Rotch will assist Harrell in securing acquisition, fmancing, leasing, development, and management opportunities where Harrell needs such assistance, in allowing Harrell to advise potential owners, sellers and others of Harrell's relationship with Rotch as outlined herein, and disclose Rotch's history, portfolio and any other information approved for dissemination by Rotch.  

4. 	In cooperation with Rotch, Harrell will work to bring an international hotel franchise to the UK and Europe. 

5. 	Harrell will seek to achieve an arbitrage opportunity in hotel values through rebranding, as well as using B2B and other Harrell methodologies. 

6. 	Using Harrell relationships, Harrell will introduce and promote the Rotch interactive property management system to other groups. 

For the provision of services outlined above, Harrell will receive customary fees together with equity participations under a mutually agreeable formula. 

Additionally, Harrell will offer to Rotch, shares and/or options in Harrell, at a price and under a formula to be mutually agreed upon.  

This letter constitutes the understanding between Rotch and Harrell, and a formal and more definitive agreement will be entered into between the parties within 30 days.   

Agreed:  	Mr. Vincent Tchenguiz, Chairman, Rotch Property Group Limited and 
		Mr. Paul L Barham, Chief Executive Officer, Harrell Hospitality Group, Inc.
### §410eeee–12. Cooperative agreements with State

In administering the national river, the Secretary is authorized to enter into cooperative agreements with the State of West Virginia, or any political subdivision thereof, for the rendering, on a reimbursable or non-reimbursable basis, of rescue, fire fighting, and law enforcement services and cooperative assistance by nearby law enforcement and fire preventive agencies.

(Pub. L. 95–625, title XI, §1113, as added Pub. L. 100–534, title I, §102, Oct. 26, 1988, 102 Stat. 2700.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 460m–26 of this title.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

March 12, 2021

In the Matter of

That Marketing Solution, Inc.

File No. 500-1

CORRECTED ORDER OF 

SUSPENSION OF TRADING

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that the public interest and the 

protection of investors require a suspension in the trading of the securities of That Marketing 

Solution, Inc. (symbol: “TSTS” or “the Company”) (CIK No. 0001557796), because of questions 

regarding the accuracy and adequacy of information about the Company and its securities in the 

marketplace; the company’s operating status, if any; and because of unusual and unexplained 

trading activity affecting the market for its securities, including: (a) TSTS has not publicly 

provided information about its business or financials for several years; (b) TSTS’s telephone

number and website, listed on its profile page on OTC Markets, are non-working; (c) since at 

least early February 2021, certain social media accounts may have engaged in an attempt 

artificially to influence TSTS’s share price; and (d) during the first part of February, TSTS’s 

share price and trading volume greatly increased in the absence of any publicly available news 

from the Company. 

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors 

require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed Company.
2

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange 

Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the above-listed Company is suspended for the 

period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on March 15, 2021, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on March 26, 2021.

By the Commission.

Vanessa A. Countryman

 Secretary
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 22

- 00306

- CV

I N THE I NTEREST OF R.S., A C HILD §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 211th District Court

of Denton County ( 21

- 1653

- 16 )

D ecember 15, 2022

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

S ECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _ /s/ Elizabeth Kerr

__________________ Justice Elizabeth Kerr