alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §410aaa–76. Federal reserved water rights

#### (a) Reservation of sufficient water

Except as otherwise provided in section 204 of this Act, with respect to each wilderness area designated by this Act, Congress hereby reserves a quantity of water sufficient to fulfill the purposes of this Act. The priority date of such reserved water rights shall be October 31, 1994.

#### (b) Protection of rights reserved

The Secretary and all other officers of the United States shall take all steps necessary to protect the rights reserved by this section, including the filing by the Secretary of a claim for the quantification of such rights in any present or future appropriate stream adjudication in the courts of the State of California in which the United States is or may be joined in accordance with section 666 of title 43.

#### (c) Relinquishment or reduction of rights

Nothing in this Act shall be construed as a relinquishment or reduction of any water rights reserved or appropriated by the United States in the State of California on or before October 31, 1994.

#### (d) Specific reservation

The Federal water rights reserved by this Act are specific to the wilderness area located in the State of California designated under this Act. Nothing in this Act related to the reserved Federal water rights shall be construed as establishing a precedent with regard to any future designations, nor shall it constitute an interpretation of any other Act or any designation made thereto.

(Pub. L. 103–433, title VII, §706, Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4498.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 204 of this Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is section 204 of Pub. L. 103–433, title II, Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4485, which is not classified to the Code.

This Act, referred to in subsecs. (a), (c), and (d), is defined in section 3 of Pub. L. 103–433, which is set out as a Definitions note under section 410aaa of this title.
#### § 80.6 General requirements.

Each request shall be specific and must be accompanied by all relevant and material information bearing on the conduct for which an FCPA Opinion is requested and on the circumstances of the prospective conduct, including background information, complete copies of all operative documents, and detailed statements of all collateral or oral understandings, if any. The requesting issuer or domestic concern is under an affirmative obligation to make full and true disclosure with respect to the conduct for which an opinion is requested. Each request on behalf of a requesting issuer or corporate domestic concern must be signed by an appropriate senior officer with operational responsibility for the conduct that is the subject of the request and who has been designated by the requestor's chief executive officer to sign the opinion request. In appropriate cases, the Department of Justice may require the chief executive officer of each requesting issuer or corporate domestic concern to sign the request. All requests of other domestic concerns must also be signed. The person signing the request must certify that it contains a true, correct and complete disclosure with respect to the proposed conduct and the circumstances of the conduct.
§ 549.12 Testing. ( a ) *Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)* — ( 1 ) *Clinically indicated.* The Bureau tests inmates who have sentences of six months or more if health services staff determine, taking into consideration the risk as defined by the Centers for Disease Control guidelines, that the inmate is at risk for HIV infection. If the inmate refuses testing, staff may initiate an incident report for refusing to obey an order.
( 2 ) *Exposure incidents.* The Bureau tests an inmate, regardless of the length of sentence or pretrial status, when there is a well-founded reason to believe that the inmate may have transmitted the HIV infection, whether intentionally or unintentionally, to Bureau employees or other non-inmates who are lawfully present in a Bureau institution. Exposure incident testing does not require the inmate's consent.
( 3 ) *Surveillance Testing.* The Bureau conducts HIV testing for surveillance purposes as needed. If the inmate refuses testing, staff may initiate an incident report for refusing to obey an order.
( 4 ) *Inmate request.* An inmate may request to be tested. The Bureau limits such testing to no more than one per 12-month period unless the Bureau determines that additional testing is warranted.
( 5 ) *Counseling.* Inmates being tested for HIV will receive pre- and post-test counseling, regardless of the test results.
( b ) *Tuberculosis (TB).* ( 1 ) The Bureau screens each inmate for TB within two calendar days of initial incarceration.
( 2 ) The Bureau conducts screening for each inmate annually as medically indicated.
( 3 ) The Bureau will screen an inmate for TB when health services staff determine that the inmate may be at risk for infection.
( 4 ) An inmate who refuses TB screening may be subject to an incident report for refusing to obey an order. If an inmate refuses skin testing, and there is no contraindication to tuberculin skin testing, then, institution medical staff will test the inmate involuntarily.
( 5 ) The Bureau conducts TB contact investigations following any incident in which inmates or staff may have been exposed to tuberculosis. Inmates will be tested according to paragraph (b)(4) of this section.
( c ) *Diagnostics.* The Bureau tests an inmate for an infectious or communicable disease when the test is necessary to verify transmission following exposure to bloodborne pathogens or to infectious body fluid. An inmate who refuses diagnostic testing is subject to an incident report for refusing to obey an order.
### §1339. Limitation of authority

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to authorize the Secretary to relocate wild free-roaming horses or burros to areas of the public lands where they do not presently exist.

(Pub. L. 92–195, §10, formerly §9, Dec. 15, 1971, 85 Stat. 651, renumbered Pub. L. 94–579, title IV, §404, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2775.)
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 28 ) ll-K-(B ) -1 6 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:48 AM Sheet 28 of 325P. 2 

# 27 n-K-(B)-1 6
SUMMAR YO F BOILE RCOS T CHANGE S T OB E MAD E I N IFCAM . Lette r fro

m D.M . Olson , EE

A t o J . Pratapas , EPArEAB . Decembe r 6 , 1979 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUNDI

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(B)-1 6
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 51 

Correcting the enrollment of S. 1869. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 8, 2020 

Mr. PETERS submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Correcting the enrollment of S. 1869. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of S. 1869, an Act 

3 to require the disclosure of ownership of high-security 

4 space leased to accommodate a Federal agency, and for 

5 other purposes, the Secretary of the Senate shall, in sec6 tion 4(c)(3) of the Act, strike ‘‘thereafter for years’’ and 

7 insert ‘‘thereafter for 9 years’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT (10)(v)


                              GUILFORD MILLS, INC.
                     KEY MANAGER SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
                     (THE "STIP") FOR THE 2004 FISCAL YEAR-
                           SUMMARY OF PRINCIPAL TERMS

The STIP is an annual cash bonus plan for designated key employees. Selection
of participants in the STIP is made on an annual basis; STIP participation in
one year does not guarantee STIP participation in any subsequent year. Bonus
payments under the STIP are contingent upon two factors: (1) the Company's
actual EBITDA results for the fiscal year relative to a targeted EBITDA, and
(2) the performance of the individual STIP participant. The relative weight of
each such factor varies depending upon the roles and responsibilities of a
participant.

If the Company's actual EBITDA varies from the targeted EBITDA, an adjustment
will be made to each participant's target award (which is expressed as a
percentage of a participant's base salary), except that no bonuses will be paid
under the STIP if the Company's actual EBITDA is less than a certain threshold
of targeted EBITDA.

A person selected to participate in the STIP must be an active, full time
employee of the Company at the time the Company makes payments under the STIP
in order to be entitled to receive his STIP bonus.
### §361c. Additions to park

The boundaries of the Hot Springs National Park in the State of Arkansas are extended to include the following land, to wit: Lot 11, block 101; lot 5, block 185; lot 6, block 186; lots 5, 6, and 7, block 187; and lots 1, 2, 3, 6, and 15, block 188, United States Hot Springs Reservation, as surveyed, mapped, and plotted by the United States Hot Springs Commission, and any of such lands when acquired by the Secretary of the Interior on behalf of the United States shall be and remain a part of the Hot Springs National Park, subject to all laws and regulations applicable thereto.

(June 15, 1936, ch. 554, §1, 49 Stat. 1516; Aug. 10, 1939, ch. 639, 53 Stat. 1341.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1939—Act Aug. 10, 1939, repealed proviso which limited expenditure of funds.
### SUBCHAPTER IV—SUSTAINED-YIELD FOREST MANAGEMENT
THE GOVERNOR

Mr. Kevin Schlemmer Chief, Essential Air Service Division Office ofAviationAnalysis COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVP,N!A OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR HARRISBURG

July17,2014

United States DepartmentofTransportation 400 Seventh St

## s:w., Suite 6401 Washington, 

### D.C. 20590 Dear

### Mr. Schlemmer: 

# D01_**orT-2-oOJ-I'fs-Z-~** 

## 0**a;~** 0 

## rt/' 1111- 

### 25-z 3

I 

### am vvriting 

### to exp.ress my 

### support for the waiver process regarding Essential Air Service at both Franklin's Venango County Regional Airport**~;;nd** Bradford Regional Airport. 

### On April24,the U.S. Department ofTransportationissued Order 20**14·-4~26** proposing to eliminate subsidized service atthese two markets due to a low number of enplanements (iess than 

### 10 per senrice day) during the time period from October 1, 2012 through September 309 2013. My administration has been a supporter of air service development that createsjobs in Pennsylvania, improves commerce and strengthem:. the state's 

### overall economy. Both PennDOT and the Pennsylvania .Department ofCommunity and Economic**Develop~ent** have'engaged 

### in programs that support Pennsylvania**~~.** ; For nearly three years, the air service development communities and Pittsburgh International Airport have invested a significant amount ofmoney toward studying problems regarding current 

### air service. They have identified a viable solution that improves passenger traffic and allows both communities to fully satisfy EAS minimums such as the 1 0 enpianement rule and the $200 subsidy per passenger rule. This iniiiative has resulted inthe addition ofthree new carriers 

### applying' for bids to PIT with greater frequency, reduced costs and a strong model ofefficiency. 

### \ I appreciate the opportunity to express my support for the waiver process for Franklin's Venango

County Airport and Bradford Regional Airport, 

### as well as the contributions that PIT has brought to the entire program. Sincerely,

..

# ~~' 

# .. TOM CORBETT Governor
!"#	$#%
	!	%&
"

"#"'()*+,-.

	$
".	"

		"
	."$
%	-
%		/

-
	0012./	
#	/
"
	.	
#(/#

.$%			
%3%$"#

	&405.

-%
"0%	

	
#(/#	6%"	.7""

"#	"
.	"."	$.-	!	%"	#".
%#"	.	
"#"



%	
		/-7"
%%		
"$

		
	&$
%0

.888888888888888 8888888888888888888888888888

9".:(	%$/;%.3

(
	"

<<!
#4

	#

!
#4

	#-!	%

22
	="3
:	-:*22

0>.	"-?@@*

'A2,B+@@@+

?:)@+*@


 !"#

Jun 26 2017 /s/ Frank J. Santoro

Entered on Docket: 6/26/17 sm

Case 15-13131-KHK Doc 66 Filed 06/26/17 Entered 06/26/17 12:13:21 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 3
:

  <<;

	3-;	  

;

	3-;	


	/
	
	

CB0>.	"4"(-:2

=		
-?@2B+

D
$0%0C2@@',	""$"


!
	3
"3	.	7.
	./.<
		1.%
00$	/	"%	%
D
$0

%0C2@@',

<<!
#4

	#888888888888

!
#4

	#-	!	%


 $"#

Case 15-13131-KHK Doc 66 Filed 06/26/17 Entered 06/26/17 12:13:21 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 3

	



	3
	/
	/

	
	

B	-2

:
	.-?@@*

;

	3-;	


	/
	
	

CB0>.	"4"(-:2

=		
-?@2B+

!
#4

	#

	!	%

22="3
:	-:*22

0>.	"-?@@*

Case 15-13131-KHK Doc 66 Filed 06/26/17 Entered 06/26/17 12:13:21 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 3
§ 540.20 Inmate correspondence with representatives of the news media. ( a ) An inmate may write through “special mail” to representatives of the news media specified by name or title (see § 540.2(b)).
( b ) The inmate may not receive compensation or anything of value for correspondence with the news media. The inmate may not act as reporter.
( c ) Representatives of the news media may initiate correspondence with an inmate. Staff shall open incoming correspondence from representatives of the media and inspect for contraband, for its qualification as media correspondence, and for content which is likely to promote either illegal activity or conduct contrary to Bureau regulations.
[50 FR 40109, Oct. 1, 1985, as amended at 75 FR 21164, Apr. 23, 2010]
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 41 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 41

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Secretary of the Navy should 
 name the next Virginia-class submarine of the United States Navy the 
                           ``USS Wisconsin''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 23, 2020

   Ms. Baldwin (for herself and Mr. Johnson) submitted the following 
  concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Armed 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of Congress that the Secretary of the Navy should 
 name the next Virginia-class submarine of the United States Navy the 
                           ``USS Wisconsin''.

Whereas Wisconsin has a rich and historical connection to the United State Navy, 
        evidenced particularly by the fact that the submarine fleet of the 
        United States Navy produced 28 freshwater submarines for the World War 
        II war effort;
Whereas the first USS Wisconsin (BB-9) was an 11,565-ton Illinois-class 
        battleship that was commissioned in 1901, sailed as the flagship of both 
        the Pacific Squadron and Asiatic Fleet, and went on to sail in the Great 
        White Fleet that circumnavigated the globe;
Whereas the USS Wisconsin (BB-64), commonly known as ``Big Wisky'' and ``the 
        Last Battleship'', was commissioned in 1944 and served in every major 
        conflict until its decommissioning in 1991, including World War II, the 
        Korean War, and the Persian Gulf War;
Whereas the USS Wisconsin (BB-64) continues to play a vital role in educating 
        visitors to Hampton Roads, Virginia, about the famed history of the 
        ship;
Whereas individual citizens of Wisconsin have played a crucial role in the 
        history of the United States Navy, including--

    (1) Admiral Marc A. Mitscher, who was one of the first aviators of the 
United States Navy and was born in Hillsboro, Wisconsin; and

    (2) Green Bay native Vice Admiral James H. Flatley, Jr., who was a key 
figure in the Battle of the Coral Sea and the Guadalcanal campaign;

Whereas 63 citizens of Wisconsin have been recipients of a Medal of Honor, 
        including 10 citizens of Wisconsin who have received a Medal of Honor 
        from the Department of the Navy; and
Whereas there has not been a USS Wisconsin in service for nearly 3 decades: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That the Secretary of the Navy should name the next Virginia-class 
submarine of the United States Navy the ``USS Wisconsin''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 50.7 Consent judgments in actions to enjoin discharges of pollutants. ( a ) It is hereby established as the policy of the Department of Justice to consent to a proposed judgment in an action to enjoin discharges of pollutants into the environment only after or on condition that an opportunity is afforded persons (natural or corporate) who are not named as parties to the action to comment on the proposed judgment prior to its entry by the court.
( b ) To effectuate this policy, each proposed judgment which is within the scope of paragraph (a) of this section shall be lodged with the court as early as feasible but at least 30 days before the judgment is entered by the court. Prior to entry of the judgment, or some earlier specified date, the Department of Justice will receive and consider, and file with the court, any written comments, views or allegations relating to the proposed judgment. The Department shall reserve the right ( 1 ) to withdraw or withhold its consent to the proposed judgment if the comments, views and allegations concerning the judgment disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the proposed judgment is inappropriate, improper or inadequate and
( 2 ) to oppose an attempt by any person to intervene in the action.
( c ) The Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Land and Natural Resources Division may establish procedures for implementing this policy. Where it is clear that the public interest in the policy hereby established is not compromised, the Assistant Attorney General may permit an exception to this policy in a specific case where extraordinary circumstances require a period shorter than 30 days or a procedure other than stated herein.
[Order No. 529-73, 38 FR 19029, July 17, 1973]
### §410ww–2. Park general management plan

#### (a) In general

Not later than 3 complete fiscal years after October 16, 1992, the Secretary, with the advice of the Commission, shall prepare and submit to the Congress a general management plan for the park which includes but is not limited to the information described in section 100502 of title 54, and which takes into account the preservation and development plan developed under section 410ww–22 of this title.

#### (b) Park partnerships

The management plan shall identify partnership opportunities between the Secretary and other Federal, State, and local governments and the private sector for the development, use, and interpretation of properties within the park.

(Pub. L. 102–419, title I, §103, Oct. 16, 1992, 106 Stat. 2142.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

In subsec. (a), "section 100502 of title 54" substituted for "section 12(b) of the Act of August 18, 1970 (16 U.S.C. 1a–7(b))" on authority of Pub. L. 113–287, §6(e), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272, which Act enacted Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
#### § 42.611 EEOC negotiated settlements and conciliation agreements.

If the parties enter into a negotiated settlement (as described in 29 CFR 1601.20) prior to a determination or a conciliation agreement (as described in 29 CFR 1601.24) after a determination, EEOC shall notify the referring agency that the complaint has been settled. The agency shall take no further action on the complaint of employment discrimination thereafter except that the agency may take the existence of the complaint into account in scheduling the recipient for a review under the agency's regulations.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.16

                                Promissory Note

April 6, 1998                                              San Diego, California
$75,000

For value received, the undersigned jointly and severally promises to pay to the
order of Innovative Global Solution, Inc., the sum of &75,000 (Seventy Five
Thousand & 00/100 Dollars), with interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the
unpaid balance.

Said sum shall be payable in the manner following:

          $75,000 plus interest due April 6, 2001.

The undersigned shall have the right to prepay without penalty. In the event any
payment due hereunder is not made when due, the entire balance shall be
immediately due at the option of the holder.

In the event of default, the undersigned agrees to pay all reasonable attorney
fees and costs of collection.



_________________

William Son
### §3905. Clarification concerning permissible State authority

#### (a) No exemption from State motor vehicle no-fault and motor vehicle financial responsibility laws

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to exempt a risk retention group or purchasing group authorized under this chapter from the policy form or coverage requirements of any State motor vehicle no-fault or motor vehicle financial responsibility insurance law.

#### (b) Applicability of exemptions

The exemptions provided under this chapter shall apply only to the provision of liability insurance by a risk retention group or the purchase of liability insurance by a purchasing group, and nothing in this chapter shall be construed to permit the provision or purchase of any other line of insurance by any such group.

#### (c) Prohibited insurance policy coverage

The terms of any insurance policy provided by a risk retention group or purchased by a purchasing group shall not provide or be construed to provide insurance policy coverage prohibited generally by State statute or declared unlawful by the highest court of the State whose law applies to such policy.

#### (d) State authority to specify acceptable means of demonstrating financial responsibility

Subject to the provisions of section 3902(a)(4) of this title relating to discrimination, nothing in this chapter shall be construed to preempt the authority of a State to specify acceptable means of demonstrating financial responsibility where the State has required a demonstration of financial responsibility as a condition for obtaining a license or permit to undertake specified activities. Such means may include or exclude insurance coverage obtained from an admitted insurance company, an excess lines company, a risk retention group, or any other source regardless of whether coverage is obtained directly from an insurance company or through a broker, agent, purchasing group, or any other person.

(Pub. L. 97–45, §6, as added Pub. L. 99–563, §8(c), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3175.)