alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of NorAm Capital Holdings, Inc. (Registrant) for the annual period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Daniel M. Cofall, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|    |  |                                                                                                                       
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) |  | This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



|    |  |                                                                                                                                                          
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) |  | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Registrant.











|                        |                                                                       |                      | 
|----------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------- | 
|Date: December 28, 2007 | By:                                                                   | /s/ Daniel M. Cofall | 
|                        | Daniel M. Cofall
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
### §404e. Donations of money; acquisition of title to lands

In the establishment of the said Mammoth Cave National Park the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to accept donations of money for the acquisition of lands and rights therein and to acquire the same by purchase, condemnation, or otherwise.

(May 14, 1934, ch. 282, §2, 48 Stat. 775.)
### §3205. General wilderness review

#### (a) Suitability of lands for preservation; report to President

Within five years from December 2, 1980, the Secretary shall, in accordance with the provisions of section 1132(d) of this title relating to public notice, public hearings, and review by State and other agencies, review, as to their suitability or nonsuitability for preservation as wilderness, all lands within units of the National Park System and units of the National Wildlife Refuge System in Alaska not designated as wilderness by this Act and report his findings to the President.

#### (b) Presidential recommendations to Congress

The Secretary shall conduct his review, and the President shall advise the United States Senate and House of Representatives of his recommendations, in accordance with the provisions of sections 1 1132(c) and (d) of this title. The President shall advise the Congress of his recommendations with respect to such areas within seven years from December 2, 1980.

#### (c) Administration of units unaffected pending Congressional action

Nothing in this section shall be construed as affecting the administration of any unit of the National Park System or unit of National Wildlife Refuge System in accordance with this Act or other applicable provisions of law unless and until Congress provides otherwise by taking action on any Presidential recommendation made pursuant to subsection (b) of this section.

(Pub. L. 96–487, title XIII, §1317, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2485.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (c), is Pub. L. 96–487, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2371, known as the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3101 of this title and Tables.

1 So in original. Probably should be "section".
#### § 548.18 Observance of religious holy days.

Consistent with maintaining security, safety, and good order in the institution, the Warden shall endeavor to facilitate the observance of important religious holy days which involve special fasts, dietary regulations, worship, or work proscription. The inmate must submit a written request to the chaplain for time off from work to observe a religious holy day. The Warden may request the chaplain to consult with community representatives of the inmate's faith group and/or other appropriate sources to verify the religious significance of the requested observance. The chaplain will work with requesting inmates to accommodate a proper observance of the holy day. The Warden will ordinarily allow an inmate to take earned vacation days, or to make up for missed work, or to change work assignments in order to facilitate the observance of the religious holy day.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Bureau of Customs and Border Protection

###### Department of the Treasury

          - 19 CFR Part 141

### CFR Correction

In Title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 141 to 199, revised as of April 1, 2010, on page 6, the second general authority citation for part 141 is removed.

[FR Doc. 2011-6840 Filed 3-21-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Gustavo Gomez, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Teleconnect Inc. for
the three month period ended March 31, 2005;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

May 16, 2005


                              By:/s/Gustavo Gomez
                                 -----------------------------------------
                                 Gustavo  Gomez
                                 Director,  Chief Executive Officer,
                                 President, Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Treasurer
§ 51.50 Records concerning submissions. ( a ) *Section 5 files.* The Attorney General shall maintain a section 5 file for each submission, containing the submission, related written materials, correspondence, memoranda, investigative reports, data provided on electronic media, notations concerning conferences with the submitting authority or any interested individual or group, and copies of letters from the Attorney General concerning the submission.
( b ) *Objection letters.* The Attorney General shall maintain section 5 notification letters regarding decisions to interpose, continue, or withdraw an objection.
( c ) *Computer file.* Records of all submissions and their dispositions by the Attorney General shall be electronically stored.
( d ) *Copies.* The contents of the section 5 submission files in paper, microfiche, electronic, or other form shall be available for obtaining copies by the public, pursuant to written request directed to the Chief, Voting Section, Civil Rights Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC. Such written request may be delivered to the addresses or telefacsimile number specified in § 51.24 or by electronic mail to *Voting.Section@usdoj.gov .* It is the Attorney General's intent and practice to expedite, to the extent possible, requests pertaining to pending submissions. Those who desire copies of information that has been provided on electronic media will be provided a copy of that information in the same form as it was received. Materials that are exempt from inspection under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b), may be withheld at the discretion of the Attorney General. The identity of any individual or entity that provided information to the Attorney General regarding the administration of section 5 shall be available only as provided by § 51.29(d). Applicable fees, if any, for the copying of the contents of these files are contained in the Department of Justice regulations implementing the Freedom of Information Act, 28 CFR 16.10.
[Order No. 3262-2011, 76 FR 21248, Apr. 15, 2011]
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

28) ll-K-(B) -16 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/200811:12:48 AM Sheet 28 of 325 
P.2 

27 

n-K-(B)-16 

SUMMARY OF BOILER COST CHANGES TO BE MADE IN IFCAM. 

Letter from D.M. Olson, EEA to J. Pratapas, EPArEAB. 

December 6, 1979. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(B)-16
§ 71.32 Location of hearing. ( a ) The hearing may be held: ( 1 ) In any judicial district of the United States in which the defendant resides or transacts business;
( 2 ) In any judicial district of the United States in which the claim or statement in issue was made; or
( 3 ) In such other place as may be agreed upon by the defendant and the ALJ.
( b ) Each party shall have the opportunity to present argument with respect to the location of the hearing.
( c ) The hearing shall be held at the place and at the time ordered by the ALJ.
Wetland 

Number

Beginning 

Milepost

NWI 

Classification a/

Crossing 

Length (feet)

NYSDEC 

Wetland 

Number

Isolated 

Wetland b/

During 

Construction 

(acres)

D

Op

(

W-01-RK-01 0.3 PEM/PSS 1,636 TBD 5.2 W-01-RK-02 0.7 PEM/PSS 475 TH-28 TBD 1.2 W-01-RK-06 3.1 PEM/PFO 0 TBD 0.0 W-01-RK-03 3.3 PEM/PFO 105 TBD 0.1 W-01-RK-04 3.3 PEM/PFO 158 TBD 0.2 W-01-RK-07 4.8 PFO/PSS 0 TBD 0.0 W-01-RK-05 4.9 PEM/PFO 0 TBD 0.0 

Total 7 wetlands 2,374 feet 6.7 

0.4 miles

a/ NWI Classification: P = Palustrine

R = Riverine

EM = Emergent

FO = Forest

SS = Scrub-shrub

OW = Open water

AB = Aquatic Bed

US = Unconsolidated Shore

c/ Construction impacts based on a 100-foot-wide right-of-way. Operational impacts based on a 75-foot-wide right-ofwhich only a 10-foot-wide corridor (centered on the pipeline) would be maintained in a herbaceous state. Trees within the pipeline and greater than 15 feet tall may be selectively cut and removed. 

b/ The COE had not issued jurisdictional determination letters as of September 1, 2006. 

Table G3

Wetlands Affected by Construction and Operation of the Algonquin Ramapo Expansion P

Wetlands Affecte

1
§ 600.7 Conduct and accountability. ( a ) A Special Counsel shall comply with the rules, regulations, procedures, practices and policies of the Department of Justice. He or she shall consult with appropriate offices within the Department for guidance with respect to established practices, policies and procedures of the Department, including ethics and security regulations and procedures. Should the Special Counsel conclude that the extraordinary circumstances of any particular decision would render compliance with required review and approval procedures by the designated Departmental component inappropriate, he or she may consult directly with the Attorney General.
( b ) The Special Counsel shall not be subject to the day-to-day supervision of any official of the Department. However, the Attorney General may request that the Special Counsel provide an explanation for any investigative or prosecutorial step, and may after review conclude that the action is so inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices that it should not be pursued. In conducting that review, the Attorney General will give great weight to the views of the Special Counsel. If the Attorney General concludes that a proposed action by a Special Counsel should not be pursued, the Attorney General shall notify Congress as specified in § 600.9(a)(3).
( c ) The Special Counsel and staff shall be subject to disciplinary action for misconduct and breach of ethical duties under the same standards and to the same extent as are other employees of the Department of Justice. Inquiries into such matters shall be handled through the appropriate office of the Department upon the approval of the Attorney General.
( d ) The Special Counsel may be disciplined or removed from office only by the personal action of the Attorney General. The Attorney General may remove a Special Counsel for misconduct, dereliction of duty, incapacity, conflict of interest, or for other good cause, including violation of Departmental policies. The Attorney General shall inform the Special Counsel in writing of the specific reason for his or her removal.
§ 701.16 Appeals. ( a ) *Appeals to Independent Counsel.* When a request for access to records or for a waiver of fees has been denied in whole or in part, or when the Office fails to respond to a request within the time limits set forth in the FOIA, the requester may appeal the denial of the request to Independent Counsel within 30 days of his receipt of a notice denying his request. An appeal to Independent Counsel shall be made in writing and addressed to the Office of Independent Counsel, Suite 701 West, 555 Thirteenth Street NW., Washington, DC 20004. Both the envelope and the letter of appeal itself must be clearly marked: “Freedom of Information Act Appeal.”
( b ) *Action on appeals by the Office of Independent Counsel.* Unless Independent Counsel otherwise directs, his designee shall act on behalf of the Independent Counsel on all appeals under this section, except that a denial of a request by Independent Counsel shall constitute the final action of the Office on that request.
( c ) *Form of action on appeal.* The disposition of an appeal shall be in writing. A decision affirming in whole or in part the denial of a request shall include a brief statement of the reason or reasons for the affirmance, including each FOIA exemption relied upon and its relation to each record withheld, and a statement that judicial review of the denial is available in the United States District Court for the judicial district in which the requester resides or has his principal place of business, the judicial district in which the requested records are located, or the District of Columbia. If the denial of a request is reversed on appeal, the requester shall be so notified and the request shall be processed promptly in accordance with the decision on appeal.
§ 512.14 Submission and processing of proposal. ( a ) An applicant may submit a preliminary research proposal for review by the Office of Research and Evaluation, Federal Bureau of Prisons, 320 First Street, NW., Washington, DC 20534. Staff response to the preliminary proposal does not constitute a final decision.
( b ) If the study is to be conducted at only one institution, the applicant shall submit a formal proposal to the warden of that institution. Proposal processing will be as follows: ( 1 ) The warden shall appoint a local research review board to consult with operational staff, to evaluate the proposal for compliance with research policy, and to make recommendations to the warden. The local research review board is encouraged, but not required, to meet the membership requirements of an IRB, as specified in 28 CFR part 46.
( 2 ) The warden shall review the comments of the board, make a recommendation regarding the proposal, and forward the proposal package to the Regional Director, with a copy to the Chief, ORE.
( 3 ) The Regional Director shall review the proposal and forward recommendations to the Chief, ORE.
( c ) If the study is to be conducted at more than one institution or at any other Bureau location, the applicant shall submit the research proposal to the Chief, Office of Research and Evaluation, Federal Bureau of Prisons, 320 First Street, NW., Washington, DC 20534. The Chief, ORE, shall determine an appropriate review process.
( d ) All formal proposals will be reviewed by the BRRB.
( e ) The BRRB chairperson may exercise the authority of the full BRRB under an expedited review process when another official IRB (either within or outside the Bureau) has approved the research, or when, in his/her judgment, the research proposal meets the minimal risk standard and involves only the following: ( 1 ) The study of existing data, documents, or records; and/or
( 2 ) The study of individual or group behavior or characteristics of individuals, where the investigator does not manipulate subjects' behavior and the research will not involve stress to subjects. Such research would include test development and studies of perception, cognition, or game theory. If a proposal is processed under expedited review, the BRRB chairperson must document in writing the reason for that determination.
( f ) The Chief, ORE, shall review all recommendations made and shall submit them in writing to the Director, Bureau of Prisons.
( g ) The Director, Bureau of Prisons, has final authority to approve or disapprove all research proposals. The Director may delegate this authority to the Assistant Director, Information, Policy, and Public Affairs Division.
( h ) The approving authority shall notify in writing the involved region(s), institution(s), and the prospective researcher of the final decision on a research proposal.
[59 FR 13860, Mar. 23, 1994, as amended at 62 FR 6661, Feb. 12, 1997]
## j I

1 

### SERVED: October 8, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC

IN THE MATTER OF RIDAN INVESTMENTS, INC. FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA 2013- 1082


### AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER We do not anticipate reaching this case priorto January 2015. Unless specifically changedherein all prior orders remain in effect. WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the following procedural schedule: 1. Onor before January 9, 2015, the parties shall conclude all discovery including, butnot limitedto, depositions, documentproduction, responses to production requests and/or interrogatories. Ifthe parties cannotresolve a discovery dispute they shall submitthe dispute to the undersigned for resolution in a timely manner; 2. Theparties shall be preparedto presentthis case at ahearing on or after January 9, 2015, subjectto the availability ofcourtroom facilities. The specific date and time for the hearing will be forthcoming in a separate Order.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment- Service ListSERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWright Building-Suite 2W1000 1

President Ridan Investments, Respondent 18540 Minthorn Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 TEL: NOTPROVIDED FAX: NOTPROVIDED ONE COPY

Lawrence M. Burek, Respondent's Counsel 550 North Parkcenter Drive, Suite 204 Santa Ana, CA 92705 TEL: 714-564-9033 FAX: NOT PROVIDED Tammy Leach P.O. Box 891324 Temecula, CA92589 TEL: 951-970-6762 FAX: NOT PROVIDED Courtney Adolph, Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, Western-Pacific Region Federal Aviation Administration P.O. Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 TEL: 310-725-7128 FAX: 310-725-6816 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. DepartmentofTransportation 1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2013-1082 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.