1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CHARLES E. CANTER (Cal. Bar No. 263197)

Email: canterc@sec.gov

MICHAEL J. SIMEONE (Cal. Bar No. 326844)

Email: simeonem@sec.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Securities and Exchange Commission

Katharine Zoladz, Co-Acting Regional Director

Gary Y. Leung, Regional Trial Counsel

444 S. Flower Street, Suite 900

Los Angeles, California 90071

Telephone: (323) 965-3998

Facsimile: (213) 443-1904

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ZERA FINANCIAL LLC,

LUIS A. ROMERO, aka LUIS A. 

ROMERO-NAVARETTE; aka LUIS

A. ROMERO-NAVARRETE,

Defendants.

Case No.

COMPLAINT 

(FILED UNDER SEAL)

8:23-cv-01807-CJC (ADSx)

FILED 

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT 

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

BY:_� · D. Lewman _ 

� DEPUTY

9/27/23

Case 8:23-cv-01807-CJC-ADS Document 1 Filed 09/27/23 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:1
1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) files 

this complaint against Defendants Zera Financial LLC (“Zera”) and Luis A. Romero 

(“Romero”) and alleges:

JURISDICTION

1. The Court has jurisdiction over this action under Sections 20(b), 

20(d)(1), and 22(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”), 15 U.S.C. 

§§ 77t(b), 77t(d)(1) & 77v(a), and Sections 21(d)(1), 21(d)(3)(A), 21(e), and 27(a) of 

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 78u(d)(1), 

78u(d)(3)(A), 78u(e) & 78aa(a).

2. Defendants have, directly or indirectly, made use of the means or 

instrumentalities of interstate commerce, of the mails, or of the facilities of a national 

securities exchange in connection with the transactions, acts, practices, and courses of 

business alleged in this complaint. 

3. Venue is proper in this district under Section 22(a) of the Securities Act, 

15 U.S.C. § 77v(a), and Section 27(a) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78aa(a), 

because Zera is headquartered in this district and Romero resides in this district.

SUMMARY

4. This securities fraud enforcement action involves an ongoing, Ponzi-like 

scheme in which Zera and Romero have raised more than $2.2 million from about 

168 investors and have dissipated most investor funds. The federal securities laws 

vest in this Court the power to enjoin, on an emergency basis, further violations of 

law. The Court also has the equitable authority to freeze the assets of securities law 

violators, order Defendants to provide a sworn accounting of their financial affairs, 

and prohibit Defendants from destroying relevant documents. Because Defendants 

continue to raise money from investors and have a history of quickly dissipating 

investor funds for personal use, the SEC now brings this action to secure that 

emergency relief in this Court. 

Case 8:23-cv-01807-CJC-ADS Document 1 Filed 09/27/23 Page 2 of 17 Page ID #:2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5. Through a public website, a mobile application, an Instagram account, 

and word of mouth, Defendants promise investors 3% monthly returns—amounting 

to more than 36% annual returns—on investments of as little as $500. Besides these 

incredible monthly returns, Defendants also falsely represented that investments in 

Zera were FDIC insured. Romero further falsely posed as a Zera investor in an online 

forum to quell concerns that Zera’s returns were too good to be true. But they are too 

good to be true. In fact, Zera has no meaningful business apart from raising money 

and making Ponzi-like payments to investors. Moreover, Romero misappropriates 

and commingles investor funds with his own. He has deposited hundreds of 

thousands of investor dollars in various crypto asset accounts held in his own name 

and has spent hundreds of thousands of investor dollars on personal expenses, 

including an electric truck, rent, and even tropical fish.

6. Through their conduct, Zera and Romero violated the antifraud 

provisions of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, 

15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, and the antifraud provisions of Section 

17(a) of the Securities Act, 15 U.S.C. § 77q(a). 

7. In addition to emergency relief, the SEC seeks permanent injunctions 

against future violations of Exchange Act Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder 

and Securities Act Section 17(a), conduct-based injunctions prohibiting Zera and 

Romero from participating in the issuance, purchase, offer, or sale of any security, 

civil penalties, disgorgement of all ill-gotten gains, and an order barring Romero from 

serving as an officer or director of a public company.

THE DEFENDANTS

8. Zera Financial LLC is a California LLC headquartered in Westminster, 

California.

9. Luis A. Romero, age 25, resides in Westminster and/or Irvine, 

California. Romero is the CEO, sole owner, and control person of Zera.

Case 8:23-cv-01807-CJC-ADS Document 1 Filed 09/27/23 Page 3 of 17 Page ID #:3
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THE ALLEGATIONS

10. Since at least January 2021 through the present, Zera has raised about 

$2.28 million from at least 170 investors.

11. Zera maintains a website, zerafinancial.com, which is available to the 

general public and which promises to investors: “Get paid a fixed 3% interest on your 

deposit every month. Withdraw or redeposit your interest every month.”

12. An investment-return calculator on Zera’s website allows prospective 

investors to “See How Much You Can Make” by entering and adjusting principal 

investment amounts and term length.

13. Investor agreements with Zera state that the minimum term is 6 months 

for investments of $500 to $15,000; one year for investments of $15,001 to $100,000; 

and two years for investments over $100,000.

14. Zera’s website states that interest may be withdrawn or redeposited each 

month, but that principal investments cannot be withdrawn before the end of the 

investor’s term without incurring an unspecified penalty. Investor agreements with 

Zera further state that the early-withdrawal penalty is 15% of total account funds.

15. Zera solicits investors through its website, an Instagram account with the 

handle @zerafinancial, and by word of mouth.

16. In addition, Zera’s website contains links to its mobile application, 

which is available for Apple devices on the App Store and for Android devices on 

Google Play.

17. The download pages for both versions of the application repeat many of 

the same statements set forth on Zera’s website, including the promise to “EARN A

FIXED 3% INTEREST EVERY MONTH!”

18. Zera’s Instagram account promised returns of “3% IN 1 MONTH. 18% 

IN 6 MONTHS. 36% IN 1 YEAR. 72% IN 2 YEARS. 108% IN 3 YEARS.” 

19. Zera pooled investor funds in a number of bank accounts to be managed 

by Zera and Romero.

Case 8:23-cv-01807-CJC-ADS Document 1 Filed 09/27/23 Page 4 of 17 Page ID #:4
4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

20. Investors are entirely passive and the returns Zera promised are derived 

solely from the efforts of Zera and Romero.

21. Investments in Zera are securities in the form of investment contracts.

The Fraud

22. Zera and Romero made materially false and misleading statements to 

investors on Zera’s website, Instagram account, and in oral and written 

communications with prospective investors and investors.

False Statements About FDIC Insurance and Investment Safety

23. Zera and Romero made false and misleading representations to investors 

about the safety of investments with Zera and how those investments were secure 

because they were FDIC insured.

24. Before March 2023, Zera’s website stated, “Your accounts are insured 

with the FDIC . . . .”

25. In addition, the website’s FAQs contained the following entries:

(a) “How Safe Is This? 

The FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) insures our 

accounts up to $250,000.”

(b) “What Will Happen To My Funds If Zera Collapses?

As long as our total value of accounts do not exceed FDIC limits 

you will not lose any portion of your funds if Zera collapses.”

26. On its Instagram account, Zera similarly stated that “Funds Held In 

FDIC Insured Bank.”

27. Many potential investors inquired about the safety of investments with 

Zera, asking about Zera’s claim to be FDIC insured. Zera repeatedly emphasized that 

because of FDIC insurance, investments with Zera were “secure.”

28. For example, on or about August 24, 2022, when asked by one 

prospective investor whether funds deposited to Zera are “guaranteed like a CD or 

Case 8:23-cv-01807-CJC-ADS Document 1 Filed 09/27/23 Page 5 of 17 Page ID #:5
5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

high-yield account,” a representative of Zera replied, “Yes .... So as long as your 

account isn’t over $250k your funds are secure.”

29. On or about August 31, 2022, when asked by a prospective investor to 

explain how Zera could offer such high returns while maintaining investor funds in 

FDIC-insured accounts, a representative of Zera responded, “When in the process of 

being FDIC insured they require us to have reserves to become a member. So when a 

new user signs up and deposits we leave your funds where it’s secured in the insured 

bank . . . and we tap in to our reserves and use that to gain a return. ... Example you 

deposit $10k we leave those in the insured bank and we use $10k from our reserves to 

use and gain a return.”

30. On or about November 2, 2022, in response to questions about why Zera 

did not appear on the FDIC’s website as an insured institution, a representative of 

Zera responded that Zera was “in the process of being a direct FDIC member,” and 

that in the meantime banks “share[] their infrastructure” with Zera, including 

“insuring your account for up to $250k with the FDIC.”

31. On or about November 21, 2022, another investor asked, “So, just to be

clear, if anything were to happen to Zera and Zera went out of business when I had 

funds invested with you, would my funds be guaranteed?” A representative of Zera 

replied, “Yes correct your funds will still be secure in the unlikely failure of Zera. We 

use a system called BaaS (banking as a service) which allows nonbank companies 

[to] offer banking services by partnering with banks to use their infrastructure that 

includes FDIC insurance[.]”

32. These statements about FDIC insurance and investment safety were false

and misleading. Zera was not a FDIC member, held only a small amount of investor 

funds in FDIC-insured bank accounts and only for relatively short periods of time, 

and had no meaningful reserves.

Case 8:23-cv-01807-CJC-ADS Document 1 Filed 09/27/23 Page 6 of 17 Page ID #:6
6

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

33. These statements about FDIC insurance and investment safety were 

material. Investors would have considered it important to know that their investments 

with Zera were not, in fact, FDIC insured.

34. On February 15, 2023, the FDIC’s Legal Division sent Zera a letter 

demanding that it “cease and desist, and take immediate corrective action to address 

the[] false and misleading statements” on its website, highlighting the above 

misrepresentations from Zera’s website FAQ’s.

35. Zera removed references to FDIC insurance from its website and 

Instagram accounts by early March 2023.

36. After the FDIC’s letter, however, Defendants continued to lie to 

investors about the safety of Zera investments.

37. For example, on or about March 12, 2023, an investor sent text messages 

to Zera containing photos of the FDIC’s letter. A representative from Zera responded, 

stating that “the matter is resolved [sic] Zera has not admitted to any liability for the 

allegations. Your funds are secured. Zera guarantees your funds . . . .”

False Statements About Management of Investor Funds

38. Zera and Romero also made false and misleading representations to 

investors about Zera’s management of investor funds. 

39. For example, during an in-person meeting with an investor in December 

2021, Romero falsely claimed that he worked with investors or bankers to manage 

investor funds.

40. In fact, only Romero managed investor funds.

41. During the same meeting, Romero told this same investor that Zera 

invested in real estate, which he represented was his “bread and butter.” 

42. In June 2023, Romero later met the same investor in an apartment in 

Irvine, California.

43. Romero falsely represented to the investor that he owned the apartment 

and rented it out on AirBnb.

Case 8:23-cv-01807-CJC-ADS Document 1 Filed 09/27/23 Page 7 of 17 Page ID #:7
7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

44. In fact, Romero leases the apartment, and his lease agreement prohibits 

short-term rentals on AirBnb.

45. Defendants engaged in no meaningful real estate investing to generate 

the promised returns for Zera investors. Rather, Romero only purchased a single, 

unimproved desert lot in San Bernardino County for less than $50,000, and he 

transacted in his own name.

Romero Poses as an Investor on Reddit

46. In or about September 2022, a Reddit user asked on a discussion thread 

whether anyone had experience with Zera, noting that its promised returns of 3% per 

month seemed “like a too-good-to-be true situation but they are FDIC insured.”

47. Romero, using the handle Mediocre-Bird3979, which is registered to the 

email address itsluisromero@gmail.com, claimed: “I was referred to [Zera] by a 

friend who had put some money with Zera. I opened a $45k account and just finished 

my term. I withdrew every month $1,350, but closed out the account to see if I will 

[sic] get my initial $45k deposit back and I did 2 days later. I’m starting another term 

with $70k. I had no issues with them.”

48. Elsewhere on the same thread, Romero, as Mediocre-Bird3979, 

challenged other posters’ skepticism of Zera, stating, “Scared money makes no 

money” and “Most of the people saying it’s a scam or ponzi [sic] I’m sure don’t even 

have an account.” 

Defendants Lull Existing Investors

49. Defendants falsely represented to existing investors that their 

investments were earning returns.

50. Investors received a text message from Zera each month, informing them 

how much interest they had “earned” in the previous month.

51. Investors who used Zera’s mobile application had access to “account 

statements” that Defendants created, which purported to show investors’ monthly 

return on investment being added to their account balances.

Case 8:23-cv-01807-CJC-ADS Document 1 Filed 09/27/23 Page 8 of 17 Page ID #:8
8

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

52. The text messages and account statements were false and misleading.

53. Zera was not earning the promised returns.

54. In Spring 2023, Zera investors began having trouble making withdrawals 

of purported returns.

55. For example, beginning in April 2023, one investor made multiple 

unsuccessful attempts to withdraw his returns.

56. In April, May, and June, Romero made various excuses to this investor 

for the failed withdrawals, including that the investor needed to “refresh” Zera’s 

mobile application, and that Zera was having trouble with its bank accounts and 

working on alternative methods of paying investors.

57. In late June 2023, the investor flew to California to meet Romero. 

There, Romero told the investor that he did not have enough cash to pay him but gave 

the investor a check for $25,500.

58. Romero said that he planned to sell some horses and real estate that he 

owned and would tell the investor that he could deposit the check once those sales 

were final. 

59. Romero never informed the investor that he could deposit the check.

Defendants Make Ponzi-Like Payments

60. From 2021 through August 2023, about $2.15 million, or nearly 79%, of 

the money in Zera’s and Romero’s bank accounts consisted of investor funds. 

61. Zera made substantial Ponzi-like payments to investors from other 

investor funds. 

62. From about January 2021 through November 2022, Romero transferred 

about $345,000 of investor funds from Zera’s bank accounts and his personal bank 

accounts (including investor funds passed through a crypto asset account in Romero’s 

mother’s name) into three crypto asset accounts on crypto trading platforms, all of 

which were in Romero’s name.

63. Through August 2023, less than $55,000 has come back into Zera’s bank 

Case 8:23-cv-01807-CJC-ADS Document 1 Filed 09/27/23 Page 9 of 17 Page ID #:9
9

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

accounts from the crypto trading platforms.

64. Even if the deposits from the crypto trading platforms represented gains 

from trading, Defendants made over $580,000 in payments to investors, far exceeding 

any amounts that could conceivably be derived from Defendants’ purported investing 

in crypto assets.

65. A review of Zera’s bank accounts in March and April 2023 illustrate 

Defendants’ Ponzi-like payments:

(a) Zera’s bank balance on February 28, 2023, was $7,404.14.

(b) Between March 1, 2023, and April 30, 2023, a total of 

$178,449.49 in deposits from approximately 33 investors were made to the account.

(c) Only $18,329.90 in other non-investor deposits were made into 

the account during this time.

(d) But in March and April of 2023, approximately $107,470.44 in 

aggregate payments were made to at least 50 investors.

Romero Commingles and Misappropriates Investor Funds

66. Investor funds were not segregated but were commingled with Romero’s 

personal funds.

67. More than $260,000 of investor funds were deposited into Romero’s 

personal bank accounts.

68. Of the more than $260,000 in investor funds deposited into Romero’s 

personal accounts, only about $33,000 was transferred to a Zera account. 

69. About $64,000 was disbursed from Romero’s personal bank accounts to 

make Ponzi-like payments to investors.

70. Another $120,000 of funds from Romero’s personal accounts were

transferred to crypto asset accounts on crypto trading platforms, where they were 

commingled with the crypto assets purchased with funds transferred from the Zera 

accounts.

71. In addition, Romero misused at least $360,000 of investor funds from 

Case 8:23-cv-01807-CJC-ADS Document 1 Filed 09/27/23 Page 10 of 17 Page ID #:10
10

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Zera’s and his personal bank accounts to cover a host of personal expenses including

horseshoes, saddles, and feed; purchases at a tropical fish store; furniture and other 

retail purchases; apartment rent; and personal car payments.

72. He also transferred about $61,000 of investor funds to a church.

73. Romero has also withdrawn more than $710,000 in cash from the Zera 

accounts.

Romero’s Scienter and Negligence

74. Romero, as the sole owner and control person of Zera, knew, or was 

reckless in not knowing, that—

(a) Zera investments were not FDIC insured or backed by reserves;

(b) he did not work with investors or bankers to manage investor 

funds; 

(c) Zera commingled investor funds with Romero’s personal funds 

and used commingled funds for Romero’s personal expenses; and

(d) Zera could not pay 3% monthly returns on investments.

75. Romero, as the sole owner and control person of Zera, was negligent in 

representing that Zera investments were FDIC insured, that he worked with investors 

or bankers to manage investor funds, and that Zera paid 3% monthly returns on 

investments.

76. Romero, as the sole owner and control person of Zera, knew, or was 

reckless in not knowing, that text messages and account statements sent to Zera 

investors were false.

77. Romero, as the sole owner and control person of Zera, was negligent in 

causing Zera to send false text messages and account statements to investors showing 

non-existent returns.

78. Romero, as the sole owner and control person of Zera, knowingly or 

recklessly posed as a Zera investor on Reddit.

Case 8:23-cv-01807-CJC-ADS Document 1 Filed 09/27/23 Page 11 of 17 Page ID #:11
11

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

79. Romero, as the sole owner and control person of Zera, was negligent in 

posing as a Zera investor on Reddit. 

80. Romero, as the sole owner and control person of Zera, knew, or was 

reckless in not knowing that the payments to investors were Ponzi-like payments from 

investor funds.

81. Romero, as the sole owner and control person of Zera, was negligent in

making Ponzi-like payments to investors.

82. Romero, as the sole owner and control person of Zera, knew, or was 

reckless in not knowing that he was not authorized to commingle investor funds with 

his personal funds or to misappropriate investor funds for his personal use.

83. Romero, as the sole owner and control person of Zera, was negligent by 

commingling investor funds with his personal funds and by misappropriating investor 

funds for his personal use.

84. Because Romero controlled Zera, his scienter and his negligence can be 

imputed to Zera.

FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF

Fraud in Connection with the Purchase or Sale of Securities

Violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5

85. The SEC realleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 

84 above.

86. Zera and Romero carried out a scheme to defraud through the 

combination of their deceptive statements and actions concerning investments in Zera 

and Zera’s business. Specifically, Zera and Romero commingled and misappropriated 

investor funds, made Ponzi-like payments, created false account statements, and 

posed as a Zera investor on Reddit.

87. In addition, Zera and Romero misled and deceived investors by falsely 

representing to investors that Zera investments were FDIC insured, by falsely 

representing how Zera managed investor funds, and by falsely representing the return 

Case 8:23-cv-01807-CJC-ADS Document 1 Filed 09/27/23 Page 12 of 17 Page ID #:12
12

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

on investment.

88. Because Romero is the sole owner and control person of Zera who 

exercised day-to-day control over its activities, he is the maker of Zera’s false 

statements to investors.

89. By engaging in the conduct described above, Zera and Romero, directly 

or indirectly, in connection with the purchase or sale of securities, by the use of 

means or instrumentalities of interstate commerce, or the mails, (a) employed 

devices, schemes, or artifices to defraud; (b) made untrue statements of material facts 

or omitted to state material facts necessary in order to make the statements made, in 

the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; and 

(c) engaged in acts, practices, or courses of business which operated or would operate 

as a fraud or deceit upon other persons, including purchasers and sellers of securities.

90. Zera and Romero, with scienter, employed devices, schemes, or artifices 

to defraud; made untrue statements of material facts or omitted to state material facts 

necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances 

under which they were made, not misleading; and engaged in acts, practices, or 

courses of business which operated or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon other 

persons, including purchasers and sellers of securities by the conduct described in 

detail above.

91. By engaging in the conduct described above, Zera and Romero violated, 

and unless restrained and enjoined will continue to violate, Section 10(b) of the 

Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5.

SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF

Fraud in the Offer or Sale of Securities

Violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act

92. The SEC realleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 

84 above.

93. In the offer or sale of the Zera securities, Zera and Romero carried out a 

Case 8:23-cv-01807-CJC-ADS Document 1 Filed 09/27/23 Page 13 of 17 Page ID #:13
13

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

scheme to defraud through the combination of their deceptive statements and actions 

concerning investments in Zera and Zera’s business. Specifically, Zera and Romero 

commingled and misappropriated investor funds, made Ponzi-like payments, created 

false account statements, and posed as a Zera investor on Reddit.

94. In addition, Zera and Romero misled and deceived investors by falsely 

representing to investors that Zera investments were FDIC insured, by falsely 

representing how Zera managed investor funds, and by falsely representing the return 

on investment.

95. By engaging in the conduct described above, Zera and Romero, directly 

or indirectly, in the offer or sale of securities, by use of the means or instruments of 

transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails 

(a) employed devices, schemes, or artifices to defraud; (b) obtained money or 

property by means of untrue statements of material facts or by omitting to state 

material facts necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the 

circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; and (c) engaged in 

transactions, practices, or courses of business which operated or would operate as a 

fraud or deceit upon the purchaser.

96. Zera and Romero, with scienter, employed devices, schemes, or artifices 

to defraud; with scienter and/or negligence, obtained money or property by means of 

untrue statements of material facts or by omitting to state material facts necessary in 

order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they 

were made, not misleading; and with scienter and/or negligence, engaged in 

transactions, practices, or courses of business which operated or would operate as a 

fraud or deceit upon the purchaser.

97. By reason of the foregoing, Zera and Romero violated, and unless 

restrained and enjoined will continue to violate, Sections 17(a) of the Securities Act, 

15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)

Case 8:23-cv-01807-CJC-ADS Document 1 Filed 09/27/23 Page 14 of 17 Page ID #:14
14

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, the SEC respectfully requests that the Court:

I.

Issue findings of fact and conclusions of law that Zera and Romero committed 

the alleged violations.

II.

Issue judgment, in forms consistent with Rule 65(d) of the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure, permanently enjoining Zera and Romero and their officers, agents, 

servants, employees, and attorneys, and those persons in active concert or 

participation with them, who receive actual notice of the judgment by personal 

service or otherwise, and each of them, from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange 

Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5.

III.

Issue judgments, in forms consistent with Rule 65(d) of the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure, permanently enjoining Zera and Romero and their officers, agents, 

servants, employees, and attorneys, and those persons in active concert or 

participation with them, who receive actual notice of the judgment by personal 

service or otherwise, and each of them, from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities 

Act, 15 U.S.C. §77q(a).

IV.

Issue judgments, in forms consistent with Rule 65(d) of the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure, pursuant to Section 21(d)(5) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. 

§ 78u(d)(5)], permanently enjoining Zera and Romero and their officers, agents, 

servants, employees and attorneys, and those persons in active concert or 

participation with any of them, who receive actual notice of the judgment by personal 

service or otherwise, from, directly or indirectly, including, but not limited to, 

through any entity owned or controlled by Zera and/or Romero, participating in the 

issuance, purchase, offer, or sale of any security; provided, however, that such 

Case 8:23-cv-01807-CJC-ADS Document 1 Filed 09/27/23 Page 15 of 17 Page ID #:15
15

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

injunction shall not prevent Romero from purchasing or selling securities for his own 

personal account.

V.

Order Zera and Romero, jointly and severally, to disgorge all funds received 

from their illegal conduct, together with prejudgment interest thereon, pursuant to 

Exchange Act Sections 21(d)(3), 21(d)(5) and 21(d)(7), 15 U.S.C. §§ 78u(d)(3), 

78u(d)(5) & 78u(d)(7).

VI.

Order Zera and Romero to pay civil penalties under Section 20(d) of the 

Securities Act, 15 U.S.C. § 77t(d), and Section 21(d)(3) of the Exchange Act, 

15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(3).

VII.

Enter an order against Romero, pursuant to Section 20(e) of the Securities Act, 

15 U.S.C. § 77t(e), and Section 2l(d)(2) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(2), 

prohibiting him from acting as an officer or director of any issuer that has a class of 

securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78l or 

that is required to file reports pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, 

15 U.S.C. § 78o(d).

VIII.

Issue, in a form consistent with Fed. R. Civ. P. 65, a temporary restraining 

order and a preliminary injunction freezing the assets of Defendants, requiring 

accountings from each of them, prohibiting Defendants and relief defendants from 

destroying relevant documents, and granting expedited discovery.

IX.

Retain jurisdiction of this action in accordance with the principles of equity and 

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in order to implement and carry out the terms of 

all orders and decrees that may be entered, or to entertain any suitable application or 

motion for additional relief within the jurisdiction of this Court.

Case 8:23-cv-01807-CJC-ADS Document 1 Filed 09/27/23 Page 16 of 17 Page ID #:16
16

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

X.

Grant such other and further relief as this Court may determine to be just and 

necessary.

Dated: September 27, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Charles E. Canter

Charles E. Canter

Michael J. Simeone

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Securities and Exchange Commission

Case 8:23-cv-01807-CJC-ADS Document 1 Filed 09/27/23 Page 17 of 17 Page ID #:17