alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §410bbb–1. Establishment

#### (a) In general

In order to assist in the preservation, education, and interpretation of jazz as it has evolved in New Orleans, and to provide technical assistance to a broad range of organizations involved with jazz music and its history, there is hereby established the New Orleans Jazz National Historical Park (hereinafter referred to as the "historical park"). The historical park shall be administered in conjunction with the Jean Lafitte National Historical Park and Preserve, which was established to preserve and interpret the cultural and natural resources of the lower Mississippi Delta Region.

#### (b) Area included

The historical park shall consist of lands and interests therein as follows:

(1) Lands which the Secretary of the Interior (hereinafter referred to as "the Secretary") may designate for an interpretive visitor center complex.

(2) Sites that are the subject of cooperative agreements with the National Park Service for the purposes of interpretive demonstrations and programs associated with the purposes of this subchapter.

(3)(A) Sites designated by the Secretary as provided in subparagraph (B).

(B)(i) No later than 18 months after October 31, 1994, the Secretary is directed to complete a national historic landmark evaluation of sites associated with jazz in and around New Orleans as identified in the document entitled "New Orleans Jazz Special Resource Study", prepared by the National Park Service pursuant to Public Law 101–499. In undertaking the evaluation, the Secretary shall, to the extent practicable, utilize existing information relating to such sites.

(ii) If any of the sites evaluated are found to meet the standards of the National Historic Landmark program and National Park Service tests of suitability and feasibility, and offer outstanding opportunities to further the purposes of this subchapter, the Secretary may designate such sites as part of the historical park, following consultation with the owners of such sites, the city of New Orleans, the Smithsonian Institution, and the New Orleans Jazz Commission, and notification to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the United States Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of the United States House of Representatives.

(Pub. L. 103–433, title XII, §1203, Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4520.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Public Law 101–499, referred to in subsec. (b)(3)(B)(i), is Pub. L. 101–499, Nov. 2, 1990, 104 Stat. 1209, which is not classified to the Code.
#### Henry Haines, appellee, v. Daniel L. Bellinger, Impleaded with William H. Grassmeyer, appellant.

Filed March 5, 1902.

No. 11,391.

Confirmation: Appeal.

Appeal from the. district court for Buffalo county. Heard below before Sullivan, J.

*Affirmed.*

*B. 0. Hostetler,*for appellant.

*William Gaslin, contra.*

Per Curiam.

Defendants, being the owners of the fee, appeal from an order of confirmation of sale entered in proceedings brought for the purpose of foreclosing a real estate mortgage. The questions presented for consideration by the appeal have in the main been passed upon and disposed of in the case of *Iowa Loan & Trust Co. v. Estate of Devall,*63 Nebr., 826. Objection is made to the sufficiency .of the affidavit of publication of the notice of sale. The objection is not well taken. The affidavit, as well as the sheriff’s return, is sufficient evidence of publication of the notice as required by section 497 of the Code of Civil Procedure. *Nebraska Land, Stock-Growing & Investment Co. v. McKinley-Lanning Loan & Trust Co.,*52 Nebr., 410. Objection is also made because in making the appraisement of the. land, the same being a quarter section, the appraisers valued the entire tract, without taking into account a railroad right of way across the land and one acre deeded for church purposes. Conceding such to be the case, the appellants are in nowise prejudiced, and none others are complaining. On the authority of the cases cited, and for the reasons stated, the order appealed from should be, and accordingly is,

Affirmed.
Appliances & Commercial Equipment Standards: Small Electric Motors

U.S, 0epastment of Energy

Energy Efficiency and

Page I of I

EERE Home

Appliances Home

About Standards

Laws & Regulations

EPACT 2005 Test

Procedures

Peer Review

Information Resources

Notices & Rules

Schedule Setting

Public Workshops &

Hearings

State Petitions

Useful Links

Commercial Equipment

ASHRAE Products

Clothes washers

Distribution Transformers

Electric Motors

Furnaces & Boilers

High Intensity Discharge

Lamps

Refrigerated Beverage

vending Machines

Refrigeration Equipment

Small Electric Motors

Unitary Air Conditioners

& Heat Pumps

Water Heaters

Residential Products

Search Help' More Search Options n

EERE Information Center

Small Electric Motors

The Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA) of 1975 established an energy

conservation program for major household appliances. The National Energy

Conservation Policy Act of 1978 amended EPCA to add Part C of Title III, which

established an energy conservation program for certain industrial equipment.

The Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPACT) also amended EPCA, and included

amendments that expanded title III to include small electric motors.

The Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy,

Building Technologies Program conducts the program that develops equipment

energy conservation standards and has overall responsibility for rulemaking

activities for small electric motors in fulfillment of the law.

I

acuments are available as Adobe Acrobat PDFs,

Energy Conservation Standard

• Notice of public meeting and availability of4ramework Document (PDF

80 KB)

o Framework Document (PD>r 321_KB)

Determination Analysis

• Departmental Determination Concerning the Potential for Energy

Conservation Standards forrSSpoII Electric Motors, Federal Register, July

10, 2006, (PDF 112 KB) r=13

• Technical Support Document : Analysis of Energy --.oot, ;don

Standards for Small Electric Motors, June 200 1:3)

o Draft Report: "Analysis of Energy Conservation $frindards for Small

Electric Motors," June 2003 , (PDF 256 KB)

Contact Information

Antonio Bouza

Project Manager

(202) 586-4563

t5 Printable Version

Webmaster I Security & POivacy_ I Builder Technologies Program 1-Lome I EERE Home

U.S. Department of Energy

Content Last Updated: 08/14/2007

http://www.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial/small_electric_niotors.html 8/14/2007

 EERE-2007-BT-STD-0007 COMMENT 02.2
Summary of Comments on EERE-2007-BTSTD-0007_CO M M E NT_02.2. pdf

Page: 1

Number: 1 Author: DOE Subject: Comment Date: 10/24/2007 12:12:09 PM

See Comment Number 01.3

Number: 2 Author: DOE Subject: Comment Date: 10/24/2007 12:12:45 PM

See Comment Number 013

Number: 3 Author: DOE Subject: Comment Date: 10/24/2007 12:13:31 PM

See Comment Number 02.1

Number: 4 Author: DOE Subject: Comment Date: 10/24/2007 12:14:04 PM

See Comment Number 02.1

Number: 5 Author: DOE Subject: Comment Date: 10/24/2007 12:14:38 PM

See Comment Number 02.1

 EERE-2007-BT-STD-0007 COMMENT 02.2
**EXHIBIT 32.1** **SARBANES-OXLEY    SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Surgical    Partners International, Inc. (the “Company”) on    Form 10-Q    for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the    Securities and Exchange Commission (the    “Report”), I, William H. Wilcox, President and    Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to    18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to    Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my    knowledge:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.     /s/  William H. Wilcox    William H. Wilcox    President and Chief Executive Officer     May 9, 2006 A signed    original of this written statement required by Section 906    has been provided to
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**
I, Mark A. Kopser, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of United SurgicalPartners International, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theRegistrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the Registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is beingprepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the Registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theRegistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information;and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significantrole in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
/s/ Mark A. Kopser
Mark A. Kopser
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CARLOS M C CAIN

,

Appellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 9

- 00 219

- C R

Appeal from the

120 th District Court

of El Paso County , Texas

(TC# 20180D027 69 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’ s fourth m otion for extension of time within which to

file the brief until May 8, 2020

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

F ILE THE APPELLANT’S BR IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. To dd D. Morten , Appellant’s attorney, prepare the

Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or bef ore May 8, 2020

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 9 th day of Ap ril , 20 20

.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
#### § 69.405 Penalty procedures.

Agencies shall impose and collect civil penalties pursuant to the provisions of the Program Fraud and Civil Remedies Act, 31 U.S.C. sections 3803 (except subsection (c)), 3804, 3805, 3806, 3807, 3808, and 3812, insofar as these provisions are not inconsistent with the requirements herein.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 0257 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RICHARD LEE TOME,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including July 27 , 20 20 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brie f on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Laurie McKinnon Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 4 2020

06/04/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0257
§ 505.4 Calculation of assessment by unit staff. Bureau of Prisons Unit Team staff are responsible for computing the amount of the fee to be paid by each inmate who has not been exempted from fee assessment. The inmate will only be assessed an amount once for the cost of incarceration for each separate period of incarceration. ( a ) Unit Team staff are to rely exclusively on the information contained in the Presentence Investigation Report and findings and orders of the sentencing court in order to determine the extent of an inmate's assets, liabilities and dependents.
( b ) The fee is assessed in accordance with the following formula: If an inmate's assets are equal to or less than the poverty level, as established by the United States Department of Health and Human Services and published annually in the Federal Register, no fee is to be imposed. If an inmate's assets are above the poverty level, Unit Team staff are to impose a fee equal to the inmate's assets above the poverty level up to the average cost to the Bureau of Prisons of confining an inmate for one year.
( c ) If the amount of time that the inmate is in custody is less than 334 days (including pretrial custody time), the maximum fee to be imposed is to be computed by prorating the fee on a monthly basis.
#### § 551.83 Limitations on an inmate's accumulation of manuscript material.

The Warden may limit, for housekeeping, fire-prevention, or security reasons, the amount of accumulated inmate manuscript material.
#### § 51.63 Enforcement by private parties.

Private parties have standing to enforce section 5.
### §410cccc–2. Authorization of appropriations

There are hereby authorized to be appropriated such sums, but not more than $5,422,000, as may be necessary for the acquisition of land and interests in land and for the development of the Golden Spike National Historic Site 1 pursuant to sections 410cccc to 410cccc–2 of this title.

(Pub. L. 89–102, §3, July 30, 1965, 79 Stat. 426; Pub. L. 94–578, title II, §201(5), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2733.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–578 substituted "$5,422,000" for "$1,168,000".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Golden Spike National Historic Site was redesignated Golden Spike National Historical Park by Pub. L. 116–9, title II, §2205(b), Mar. 12, 2019, 133 Stat. 738, which is classified to section 410cccc–3(b) of this title.

1 See Change of Name note below.
Comment Info: =================
General Comment:Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings-Enforcement Office Update, Department of Transportation Advisory Committee for Aviation Consumer Protection
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 139 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 139

To authorize the production of records by the Permanent Subcommittee on 
 Investigations of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 
                                Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 2, 2019

  Mr. McConnell (for himself and Mr. Schumer) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To authorize the production of records by the Permanent Subcommittee on 
 Investigations of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 
                                Affairs.

Whereas, the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on 
        Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs conducted an investigation 
        into the Equifax data breach;
Whereas, the Subcommittee has received a request from the Federal Trade 
        Commission for access to records of the Subcommittee's investigation;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be 
        taken from such control or possession but by permission of the Senate;
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate is needed for the promotion of justice, the Senate will take 
        such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Chairman and Ranking Minority Member of the 
Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on Homeland 
Security and Governmental Affairs, acting jointly, are authorized to 
provide to the Federal Trade Commission and other law enforcement 
officials, regulatory agencies, and entities or individuals duly 
authorized by Federal or State governments, records of the 
Subcommittee's investigation into the Equifax data breach.
                                 <all>
```
### §403k–3. Palmer's Chapel in Cataloochee Valley of Great Smoky Mountains National Park; protection and continued use; communication of Chapel history to visitors

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized and directed to take such measures as may be necessary to provide for the continued protection of the historic Palmer's Chapel in the Cataloochee Valley of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. The importance of the chapel in memorializing the early settlement of the valley and in providing an opportunity for interpreting the cultural traditions of the former residents of the valley is hereby recognized, and the Secretary is authorized to make suitable arrangements for the history of the chapel to be communicated to park visitors and for the chapel to continue to be used for memorial purposes by former residents and their descendants.

(Pub. L. 96–199, title I, §106, Mar. 5, 1980, 94 Stat. 69.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   26,089,830
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     21,666
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       9,092,204
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     2,290,973
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,494,673
<COMMON>                                       348,198
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                    2,635,540
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          8,416,119
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>              11,399,857
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                        10,045,714
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                           7,175,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  348,044
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               8,526,058
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               37,494,673
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                   31,318,008
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           670,025
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  28,353,172
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  29,023,197
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                      2,294,811
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             214,902
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>               2,509,713
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     1,242,738
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,266,975
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                8,416,119
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       927,763
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      709,872
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         606,199
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### THE PEOPLE OF THE TERRITORY OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee v. RICHARD T. MATSUMURA, Defendant-Appellant

Criminal No. 46-A

District Court of Guam Appellate Division

January 27, 1975

Before PECKHAM, TURNER and PEREZ, *Judges*

PECKHAM, *United States District Judge,*San Francisco, California, sitting by designation

PER CURIAM

ORDER

The appeal in the above-entitled case was heard, taken under submission, and the judgment of the Court below affirmed on August 9, 1972. No formal memorialization of the action of affirmance appears in the file as of this date. For this reason the court hereby formally recites its action of affirmance of the judgment of the lower court.
§ 115.218 Upgrades to facilities and technologies. ( a ) When designing or acquiring any new facility and in planning any substantial expansion or modification of existing facilities, the agency shall consider the effect of the design, acquisition, expansion, or modification upon the agency's ability to protect residents from sexual abuse.
( b ) When installing or updating a video monitoring system, electronic surveillance system, or other monitoring technology, the agency shall consider how such technology may enhance the agency's ability to protect residents from sexual abuse.
### §18b. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act July 19, 1940, ch. 642, §3, 54 Stat. 773; Pub. L. 93–193, §2, Dec. 19, 1973, 87 Stat. 765; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(10), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 154; Pub. L. 98–443, §9(o), Oct. 4, 1984, 98 Stat. 1708, which related to an advisory committee for promotion of tourist travel, was transferred to section 1546 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
IIA 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 73 

Providing for the appointment of Franklin D. Raines as a citizen regent 

of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 11, 2020 

Mr. BOOZMAN (for himself, Mr. LEAHY, and Mr. PERDUE) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the appointment of Franklin D. Raines as 

a citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on 

5 the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in 

6 the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 

7 reason of the expiration of the term of John W. McCarter 

8 Jr. of Illinois on March 21, 2020, is filled by the appoint9 ment of Franklin D. Raines of Washington, DC. The apVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:32 May 11, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SJ73.IS SJ73

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 73 IS 

1 pointment is for a term of six years, beginning on the date 

2 of the enactment of this joint resolution. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS