alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 71.6 Prerequisites for issuing a complaint. ( a ) The reviewing official may issue a complaint under § 71.7 only if ( 1 ) The Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, approves the issuance of a complaint in a written statement described in 31 U.S.C. 3803(b)(1), and
( 2 ) In the case of allegations of liability under § 71.3(a) with respect to a claim, the reviewing official determines that, with respect to such claim or a group of related claims submitted at the same time such claim is submitted (as defined in paragraph (b) of this section), the amount of money, or the value of property or services, demanded or requested in violation of § 71.3(a) does not exceed $150,000.
( b ) For the purposes of this section, a related group of claims submitted at the same time shall include only those claims arising from the same transaction (e.g., grant, loan, application, or contract) that are submitted simultaneously as part of a single request, demand, or submission.
( c ) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the reviewing official's authority to join in a single complaint against a person claims that are unrelated or were not submitted simultaneously, regardless of the amount of money, or the value of property or services, demanded or requested.
Exhibit 32.1

                           Certification pursuant to
                                18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001.

      --------------------------------------------------------------------


In connection with the Annual Report of OSK CAPITAL II CORP.(the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George
Metrakos, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001,
that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  March 2, 2006


                     /s/ George Metrakos
                     -------------------
                     George Metrakos,
                     Chief Executive Officer
§ 68.20 Production of documents, things, and inspection of land. ( a ) Any party may serve on any other party a request to: ( 1 ) Produce and permit the party making the request, or a person acting on his/her behalf, to inspect and copy any designated documents or things or to inspect land, in the possession, custody, or control of the party upon whom the request is served; and
( 2 ) Permit the party making the request, or a person acting on his/her behalf, to enter the premises of the party upon whom the request is served to accomplish the purposes stated in paragraph (1) of this section.
( b ) The request may be served on any party without leave of the Administrative Law Judge.
( c ) The request shall: ( 1 ) Set forth the items to be inspected either by individual item or by category;
( 2 ) Describe each item or category with reasonable particularity; and
( 3 ) Specify a reasonable time, place, and manner of making the inspection and performing the related acts.
( d ) The party upon whom the request is served shall serve on the party submitting the request a written response within thirty (30) days after service of the request.
( e ) The response shall state, with respect to each item or category: ( 1 ) That inspection and related activities will be permitted as requested; or
( 2 ) That objection is made in whole or in part, in which case the reasons for objection shall be stated.
( f ) A copy of each request for production and each written response shall be served on all parties.
[54 FR 48596, Nov. 24, 1989. Redesignated by Order No. 1534-91, 56 FR 50053, Oct. 3, 1991]
#### § 32.17 Request for Hearing Officer determination.

In order to exhaust his administrative remedies, a claimant seeking relief from the denial of his claim shall request a Hearing Officer determination under subpart E of this part. Consistent with § 32.8, any denial that is not the subject of such a request shall constitute the final agency determination.
Exhibit 23





CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





We consent to the incorporation
by reference of our report dated March 1, 2002 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Hadron, Inc. included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, in the following Registration Statements:





| | 1. |  | Registration Statement Number 333-37059 (Hadron, Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan) on Form S-8
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | 2. |  | Registration Statement Number 333-42035 (Hadron, Inc. 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan) on Form S-8
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | 3. |  | Registration Statement Number 333-96297 (Hadron, Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan) on Form S-8
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | 4. |  | Registration Statement Number 333-96299 (Hadron, Inc. 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan) on Form S-8
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | 5. |  | Registration Statement Number 333-60440 (Hadron, Inc. 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan) on Form S-8
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | 6. |  | Registration Statement Number 333-60442 (Hadron, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan) on Form S-8
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP





McLean, Virginia


March 21, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 32 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 32

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign 
 military sale to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia certain defense articles 
                             and services.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the following proposed 
foreign military sale to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is prohibited:
            (1) The sale of the following defense articles, including 
        defense services and technical data, described in Transmittal 
        No. 18-21, submitted to Congress pursuant to section 36(b) of 
        the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(b)) and published 
        in the Congressional Record on June 4, 2019: The proposed sale 
        of follow-on support and services for Royal Saudi Air Force 
        aircraft, engines, and weapons; publications and technical 
        documentation; support equipment; spare and repair parts; 
        repair and return; calibration support and test equipment; 
        personnel equipment; United States Government and contractor 
        technical and logistics support; and other related elements of 
        program support.

            Passed the Senate June 20, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. J. RES. 32

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

    Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign 
 military sale to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia certain defense articles 
                             and services.
```
ËHuEpEHIrEtnfugttrslrtrlnrlilt.IIsfi110GalaxyDrive'DovËr,DE.19901'1-800-?82-8580StateofDelaware:CountyofKent:Beforeme,aNotaryPublic,fortheCountyandStateaforesaid.EdwardDulin,knowntometobesuch,whobeingswornaccordingtolawdeposedandsaysthatheisPresidentoflndependentNewsmedialnc.USA,thepublisheroftheDelawareStateNews,adailynewspaperpublishedatDover,CountyofKent,andStateofDelaware,andthatthenotice,acopyofwhichisheretoattached,aspublishedintheDelawareStateNewsinitsissueof05125114.PresidentlndependentNewsmedialnc.USASworntoandsubscribedbeforemethis25thDayofMay,4.D.,2014AdID:10882Cost:$102.77Start:05125114Stopi05/25114Class:5500,StatePublic-LegalNotices.<ffiè*('"@Ð)DNREc-\(@/DivisionofAirQualityLEGALNOTICETheDeoartmentofNaturalResourcesandEnvironmentalControl,DivisionofAirQuality,willconductapublichearingonaproposedstateimplementationplan(SIP)revision,entitled"Delaware2011BaseYearStateImplementationPlan(SIP)EmissionInventoryûnderthe2008OzóneNationalAmbientAirQualityStandard(NMQS)'1AccordingtoSection182(aX1)ofCAAandEPA'simólementationruleforthe2008ozonestandard(ProposedRule,June6,2013,78FR34178),DelawareisrequiredtosubmittoEPAinJulú2014aSIPrevisionwhichcompilesDelawãre2011em¡ssionsofvolatileorganiccompounds(VOC),oxidesofnitrogen(NOx),andcarbonmonoxide(CO)fromfivesourcesectors:stationarypointsources,stationarynon-pointsources,on-roadmobilesourcesandhon-roadmobilesources.ThesubjectemrssronlnventoryStatelmplementatlonPlanISIP)revisionundertheB-hourozoneNationàtRrîO¡entAirQualityStandard(NAAQS)settorthbyUS-EnvironmentalProtectionAgencydocumentconta¡nsDelaware'sbaseemissioninventoryStateJmplementation(EPA)in2008,RegisterofandcanbeviewedafterThepublichearingwillbeheldThursday,June26,20L4,beginningat6:00p.m.intheDN-RECAuditorium,89KinqsHighway,Dover,DE19901.ThesubiectdocumentandthesupportingmaterialsãreavailableforpublicreviewfromMay20throughJuly6,2014,attheDNRECOfficesat715GranthamLane,NewCaste,DEL9720,and,655S.BayRoad,Dover,DE19901.ThedocumentwillbepublishedintheJune1,2014issueofDelawareForadditionalinformation,pleasecontactDavidFees,intheDoverOffice,at(302)739-9402,emailDavid,Fees(ôstate.de.us.Interestedpartiesmaysubmitcommentsinwr¡t¡ngontheproposedSIPrevisionpriortothepub-ontheproposedSIPrevisionpriortothepublichearing.Commentsmaybepresentedei-presenteiJ'inwritingatthepublichearing.therorallyorwritinghear¡ng.Ifyouareunabletoattendthepublichearingyouéorwishtosubmitvourcommentsinadvanceofthepublicheaiing,pleaseaddressyourcommentsto:DivisionofAirQualitySubject:2011SIPInventory655South8ayRoadSuite5NDover,DE1990110882DSN5l2s/2014
#### John F. Yawger v. American Surety Company.

— Motion granted; question certified. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
<PAGE>


                                                                  Exhibit 21
                             Harmon Industries, Inc.
                             Listing of Subsidiaries
                                1997 Form 10-K


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                  Name Under Which
Subsidiary Name                Business is Conducted              Jurisdiction
---------------                ---------------------              ------------
<S>                            <C>                                <C>
Consolidated Asset Management  Consolidated Asset Management      Missouri
Company, Inc.                  Company, Inc.

Cedrite Technologies, Inc.     Cedrite Technologies, Inc.          Kansas

Harmon Railway Systems         Harmon Railway Systems              Virgin Islands
International Corporation      International Corporation

Vaughan Harmon Systems, Ltd.   Vaughan Harmon Systems, Ltd.        Ware, England

Vale Harmon Enterprises, Ltd.  Vale Harmon Enterprises, Ltd.       Quebec, Canada

Devtronics, Inc.               Devtronics, Inc.                    Florida

</TABLE>
§ 42.207 Compliance information. ( a ) Each recipient shall: ( 1 ) Keep such records, and submit to OJARS such timely, complete, and accurate information as OJARS may request to determine whether the recipient is complying with section 815(c)(1) of the JSIA; and
( 2 ) Permit reasonable access by OJARS to its books, documents, papers, and records, to the extent necessary to determine whether the recipient is complying with section 815(c)(1) of the JSIA.
( b ) Failure to comply with § 42.207(a) shall subject the recipient to the sanctions provided in section 803(a) of the JSIA, 42 U.S.C. 3783(a).
### §432. Boards of trade dealing in agricultural products; exclusion of representatives of cooperative associations prohibited

No board of trade whose members are engaged in the business of buying or selling agricultural products or receiving the same for sale on consignment in interstate commerce shall exclude from membership in, and all privileges on, such board of trade, any duly authorized representative of any lawfully formed and conducted cooperative association, corporate or otherwise, composed substantially of producers of agricultural products, or any such representative of any organization acting for a group of such associations, if such association or organization has adequate financial responsibility and complies or agrees to comply with such terms and conditions as are or may be imposed lawfully on other members of such board: Provided, That no rule of a board of trade shall forbid or be construed to forbid the return on a patronage basis by such cooperative association or organization to its bona fide members of moneys collected in excess of the expense of conducting the business of such association.

(Mar. 4, 1927, ch. 508, §2, 44 Stat. 1424.)
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 56 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 439
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 56

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of 
        Education relating to ``Borrower Defense Institutional 
                           Accountability''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 26, 2019

  Mr. Durbin (for himself, Mr. Schumer, Mrs. Murray, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. 
 Blumenthal, Mr. Booker, Mr. Brown, Mr. Carper, Mr. Casey, Mr. Coons, 
 Ms. Cortez Masto, Ms. Duckworth, Mrs. Feinstein, Mrs. Gillibrand, Ms. 
 Harris, Ms. Hassan, Ms. Hirono, Mr. Jones, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Leahy, 
Mr. Markey, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Reed, Ms. Rosen, 
 Mr. Sanders, Mr. Schatz, Mrs. Shaheen, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Van Hollen, 
   Ms. Warren, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Wyden, Ms. Smith, Mr. Peters, Mr. 
 Kaine, Mr. Bennet, Mr. King, Mr. Udall, Mr. Heinrich, Mr. Tester, and 
 Mr. Cardin) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
 twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and 
                                Pensions

                             March 10, 2020

  Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and 
                         placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of 
        Education relating to ``Borrower Defense Institutional 
                           Accountability''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Education relating to ``Borrower 
Defense Institutional Accountability'' (84 Fed. Reg. 49788 (September 
23, 2019)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.

                                                       Calendar No. 439

116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             S. J. RES. 56

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of 
        Education relating to ``Borrower Defense Institutional 
                           Accountability''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 10, 2020

  Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and 
                         placed on the calendar
```
CERTIFICATIONS



I,
Richard Govatski, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of NMXS.com, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date:  August
12, 2005

/s/
Richard Govatski

President
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION
      1350)**







In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Teliphone Corp. (the "Company") on
      Form
      10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George Metrakos,
      Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


By:
            /s/ George
              MetrakosGeorge
              MetrakosChief
              Executive Officer




Date:
      February 20, 2007
FORM
6-K
 SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington,
D.C.  20549
 
 
 Report
of Foreign Issuer
 
 
 Pursuant
to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
 the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
 
 
 
 For the
month of February, 2010
 
 Commission
File No. 1-9987
 
 
 B + H  O C E A
N  C A R R I E R S  L T D.
 (Translation
of registrant’s name into English)
 
 
 3rd Floor,
Par La Ville Place
 14
Par-La-Ville Road
 Hamilton HM JX
Bermuda
 (Address
of principal executive offices)
 
 
 Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under
cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
 
 Form
20-F                                X           Form
40-F
 
 Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted
by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b) (1):
 
 Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted
by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b) (7):
 
 Indicate
by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this Form, the
registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant
to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
 
 Yes           NoX
  
   INFORMATION
CONTAINED IN THIS FORM 6-K REPORT
  
 Set forth
herein as Exhibit 99.1 is the Press Release for Completion of Loan Amendments
and sale of Vessel.
 
 
  
  
 Signatures
 
 
 Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
 
 
 
 
 B+H
Ocean Carriers, Ltd.
 
 Date                      February 19,
2010                                           By:           /s/ Michael S.
Hudner
 Chief Executive Officer
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ANTHONY MILLER, SR., )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-5375

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed August 22, 2018. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota 

County; Debra Johnes Riva, Judge.

Anthony Miller, Sr., pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Chelsea S. Alper, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, C.J., and BLACK and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
### §2444. Severability

If any provision of this chapter or the application of this chapter to any person or circumstance is held invalid, neither the remainder of this chapter nor the application of that provision to other persons or circumstances shall be affected thereby.

(Pub. L. 98–623, title III, §315, Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3407.)
----

****