alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[House Hearing, 113 Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

 
                                [ERRATA]

                    TRAILS IN TRANSPARENCY II: IS VA
                      RESPONDING TO CONGRESSIONAL

                      REQUESTS IN A TIMELY MANNER?

=======================================================================

                                HEARING

                               before the

                     COMMITTEE ON VETERANS' AFFAIRS
                     U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                    ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS

                             SECOND SESSION

                               __________

                        THURSDAY, APRIL 3, 2014

                               __________

                           Serial No. 113-63

                               __________

       Printed for the use of the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

         Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.fdsys.gov

                                 ERRATA

                              ----------                              

    The referenced hearing held before the House Committee on 
Veterans' Affairs was inadvertently printed with the wrong word 
on the Title and Content page. The correct word is TRIALS and 
not TRAILS.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

RICHARD GEORGE SCHMIDT, M.D. 

 v. 

STEVEN LEE LEBOON AND 

CASSANDRA LEBOON 

PETITION OF: STEVEN LEE LEBOON 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 66 MM 2016 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 24th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for 

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc, the Application for Relief, the Motion for 

Extraordinary Relief and Sanctions, and the Renewed and Enlarged Motion for 

Extraordinary Relief are DENIED. 

Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
#### § 48.1 Purpose.

These regulations set forth the procedure by which application may be made to the Attorney General for his approval of joint newspaper operating arrangements entered into after July 24, 1970, and for the filing with the Department of Justice of the terms of a renewal or amendment of existing joint newspaper operating arrangements, as required by the Newspaper Preservation Act, Pub. L. 91-353, 84 Stat. 466, 15 U.S.C. 1801 *et seq.* The Newspaper Preservation Act does not require that all joint newspaper operating arrangements obtain the prior written consent of the Attorney General. The Act and these regulations provide a method for newspapers to obtain the benefit of a limited exemption from the antitrust laws if they desire to do so. Joint newspaper operating arrangements that are put into effect without the prior written consent of the Attorney General remain fully subject to the antitrust laws.
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 67 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 13, 2020 

Referred to the Committee on House Administration 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the reappointment of Risa Lavizzo-Mourey as 

a citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents 

5 of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other than 

6 Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the expira7 tion of the term of Risa Lavizzo-Mourey of Pennsylvania 

8 on February 21, 2020, is filled by the reappointment of 

9 the incumbent. The reappointment is for a term of six 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

SJ 67 RFH 

1 years, beginning on the later of February 21, 2020, or 

2 the date of enactment of this joint resolution. 

Passed the Senate January 9, 2020. 

Attest: JULIE E. ADAMS, 

Secretary. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
### §2001. Congressional findings

The Congress finds that:

(1) There is a growing demand on the soil, water, and related resources of the Nation to meet present and future needs.

(2) The Congress, in its concern for sustained use of the resource base of the United States, has ensured that the Department of Agriculture possesses information, technical expertise, and a delivery system for providing assistance to land users with respect to conservation and use of soils; plants; woodlands; watershed protection and flood prevention; the conservation, development, utilization, and disposal of water; animal husbandry; fish and wildlife management; recreation; community development; and related resource uses.

(3) Appraisal and inventory of resources, assessment and inventory of conservation needs, evaluation of the effects of conservation practices, and analyses of alternative approaches to existing conservation programs are basic to effective soil, water, and related natural resource conservation.

(4) Since individual and governmental decisions concerning soil and water resources often transcend administrative boundaries and affect other programs and decisions, a coordinated appraisal and program framework are essential.

(Pub. L. 95–192, §2, Nov. 18, 1977, 91 Stat. 1407; Pub. L. 103–354, title II, §246(f)(2)(A), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3225; Pub. L. 110–234, title II, §2804(a), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1086; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title II, §2804(a), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1814.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 made identical amendments to this section. The amendments by Pub. L. 110–234 were repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### Amendments

2008—Par. (2). Pub. L. 110–246, §2804(a)(1), substituted "base of the" for "base, of the".

Pars. (3), (4). Pub. L. 110–246, §2804(a)(2), added par. (3), redesignated former par. (3) as (4), and struck out "Resource appraisal is basic to effective soil and water conservation." before "Since individual".

1994—Par. (2). Pub. L. 103–354 struck out "created the Soil Conservation Service" after "resource base," and substituted ", has ensured that the Department of Agriculture" for "Department of Agriculture which" after "United States".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2008 Amendment

Amendment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as an Effective Date note under section 8701 of Title 7, Agriculture.

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 95–192, §1, Nov. 18, 1977, 91 Stat. 1407, provided: "That this Act [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Soil and Water Resources Conservation Act of 1977'."
1 The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United St ates District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-4130

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. John F. White, Jr., * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: December 27, 2006 Filed: January 8, 2007

___________ Before MURPHY, BYE, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. John F. White, Jr., appeals the 24-month sentence imposed by the district court 1 upon revocation of his supervised release. We affirm.
White was originally found guilty of w itness tampering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(b) (a Class C felony), and was sentenced in August 1996 to 36 months in prison and 3 years of supervised release. See18 U.S.C. § 1512(b) (10-year maximum prison term); 18 U.S.C. § 3559(a)(3) (offense classification). He began-2- serving his supervised release in October 1997. In January 1998, the district court issued a warrant for White’s arrest for viol ating a condition of his supervised release. At a November 2005 hearing, White admitted several violations of his conditions of supervised release, and th e court imposed the statutory maximum of 24 months in prison. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (2-year maximum revocation sentence if underlying offense was Class C felony).

We hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion in revoking White’s supervised release. See United States v. Edwards , 400 F.3d 591, 592 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (given defendant’s admission that he had violated release conditions, there was no clear error in findings of fact supporting revocation and no abuse of discretion in decision to revoke). We further hold that the 24-month revocation sentence was not unreasonable and therefore notan abuse of discretion. Specifically, the sentence was within authorized limits and was based upon the district court’s consideration of appropriate f actors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). See United States v. Tyson , 413 F.3d 824, 825 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (revocation sentences are reviewed for unreasonableness in accord ance with United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005)); United States v. Franklin , 397 F.3d 604, 606-07 (8th Cir. 2005) (all that is required is evidence that court consider ed relevant matters, not that court made specific findings on each § 3553(a) factor; although Guidelines recommended 8-14 months, 24-month revocation sentence was not abuse of discretion where transcript showed court was aware of defendant’s mu ltiple violations of supervised-release conditions and of Guidelines range and statutory maximum).
Accordingly, we affirm. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

______________________________
#### Steven Gallo, Respondent, v Rea Motors, Inc., et al., Appellants.

[823 NYS2d 700]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.), dated September 27, 2005, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the plaintiff and against them in the principal sum of $46,000, and dismissed their first and second counterclaims.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

“When interpreting a contract, the court should arrive at a construction that will give fair meaning to all of the language employed by the parties ... so that their reasonable expectations will be realized” *(Petracca v Petracca,*302 AD2d 576, 576-577 [2003]; *see Gonzalez v Norrito,*256 AD2d 440 [1998]). As a general rule, “it must clearly appear from the contract itself that the parties intended a provision to operate as a condition precedent . . . and that where there is ambiguity in a contractual term, the law does not favor a construction which creates a condition precedent” *(Lui v Park Ridge at Terryville Assn.,*196 *636AD2d 579, 582 [1993]; *see Kass v Kass,*235 AD2d 150, 159 [1997] , *affd*91 NY2d 554 [1998]; *Willis v Ronan,*218 AD2d 794, 795 [1995]). The Supreme Court’s construction of a disputed provision appearing in the parties’ shareholders’ agreement was practicable and reasonable. Moreover, the conduct of the parties does not support the defendants’ assertion that the disputed provision was intended to operate as a condition precedent *(see Harza Northeast v Lehrer McGovern Bovis,*255 AD2d 935, 936 [1998] ).

The Supreme Court also properly found that the defendants failed to establish the existence of an agreement purportedly reached on August 12, 1997. “Minutes” alleged to be a memorialization of that agreement contained none of the usual formalities characteristic of such corporate documents, and consisted of an unidentified one-page document with no signatures and no date. While several witnesses testified to the agreement’s existence, the trial court properly found that their testimony was not credible. Accordingly, the dismissal of the defendants’ first and second counterclaims, which were based on the purported agreement, was proper. Miller, J.R, Ritter, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.
### §410aaa–44. Maps and legal description

Within six months after October 31, 1994, the Secretary shall file maps and a legal description of the preserve designated under this part with the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the United States Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of the United States House of Representatives. Such maps and legal description shall have the same force and effect as if included in this part, except that the Secretary may correct clerical and typographical errors in such legal description and in the maps referred to in section 410aaa–42 of this title. The maps and legal description shall be on file and available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of the National Park Service, Department of the Interior.

(Pub. L. 103–433, title V, §504, Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4490.)
#### § 513.62 Freedom of Information Act requests by former inmates.

Former federal inmates may request copies of their Bureau records by writing to the Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, 320 First Street, NW., Washington, D.C. 20534. Such requests shall be processed pursuant to the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act. The request must be clearly marked on the face of the letter and on the envelope “FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST”, and must describe the record sought, including the approximate dates covered by the record. A former inmate making such a request must provide his or her full name, current address, date and place of birth. In addition, the requester must provide with the request an example of his or her signature, which must be either notarized or sworn under penalty of perjury, and dated within three (3) months of the date of the request.
§ 549.92 Definition of “sexually violent conduct.” For purposes of this subpart, “sexually violent conduct” includes any unlawful conduct of a sexual nature with another person (“the victim”) that involves: ( a ) The use or threatened use of force against the victim;
( b ) Threatening or placing the victim in fear that the victim, or any other person, will be harmed;
( c ) Rendering the victim unconscious and thereby engaging in conduct of a sexual nature with the victim;
( d ) Administering to the victim, by force or threat of force, or without the knowledge or permission of the victim, a drug, intoxicant, or other similar substance, and thereby substantially impairing the ability of the victim to appraise or control conduct; or
( e ) Engaging in such conduct with a victim who is incapable of appraising the nature of the conduct, or physically or mentally incapable of declining participation in, or communicating unwillingness to engage in, that conduct.
§ 51.26 General. ( a ) The source of any information contained in a submission should be identified.
( b ) Where an estimate is provided in lieu of more reliable statistics, the submission should identify the name, position, and qualifications of the person responsible for the estimate and should briefly describe the basis for the estimate.
( c ) Submissions should be no longer than is necessary for the presentation of the appropriate information and materials.
( d ) The Attorney General will not accept for review any submission that fails to describe the subject change in sufficient particularity to satisfy the minimum requirements of § 51.27(c).
( e ) A submitting authority that desires the Attorney General to consider any information supplied as part of an earlier submission may incorporate such information by reference by stating the date and subject matter of the earlier submission and identifying the relevant information.
( f ) Where information requested by this subpart is relevant but not known or available, or is not applicable, the submission should so state.
( g ) The following Office of Management and Budget control number under the Paperwork Reduction Act applies to the collection of information requirements contained in these Procedures: OMB No. 1190-0001 (expires February 28, 1994). See 5 CFR 1320.13.
[52 FR 490, Jan. 6, 1987, as amended by Order No. 1284-88, 53 FR 25327, July 6, 1988; Order No. 1498-91, 56 FR 26032, June 6, 1991]
#### § 42.410 Continuing State programs.

Each state agency administering a continuing program which receives federal financial assistance shall be required to establish a title VI compliance program for itself and other recipients which obtain federal assistance through it. The federal agencies shall require that such state compliance programs provide for the assignment of title VI responsibilities to designated state personnel and comply with the minimum standards established in this subpart for federal agencies, including the maintenance of records necessary to permit federal officials to determine the title VI compliance of the state agencies and the sub-recipient.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                         Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
                     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                       Date of Report: January 8, 1999


                       CHASE MORTGAGE FINANCE CORPORATION
              --------------------------------------------------
                           (Exact Name of Registrant)


      DELAWARE                    333-56081                52-1495132    
   --------------                -------------          ------------------
   (State or other               (Commission             (IRS Employer
   jurisdiction of                File Number)           Identification No.)
   incorporation)


                     343 Thornall Street, Edison NJ 08837       32256
                   ----------------------------------------------------
                   Address of principal executive offices)    (Zip Code)
                                                                             
  Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (732) 205-0600


<PAGE>


Item 5.  Other Events.

      Attached as an exhibit is the Collateral Term Sheet (as defined in the
no-action letter dated March 9, 1995 issued by the Securities and Exchange
Commission to the Public Securities Association) prepared by Chase Securities
Inc., which is hereby filed pursuant to such letter.



Item 7(c). Exhibits

           Exhibits            Description
           --------            -----------

             99                Collateral Term Sheet prepared by Chase
                               Securities Inc. in connection with Chase
                               Mortgage Finance Corporation, Multi-Class
                               Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
                               Series 1999-S2

<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES


      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  
the  registrant  has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


Dated: January 12, 1999


                                           CHASE MORTGAGE FINANCE CORPORATION

                                           By:   /s/ Eileen Lindblom
                                                -------------------
                                           Name:   Eileen Lindblom
                                           Title:  Vice President
 

<PAGE>

                                 INDEX TO EXHIBITS
                                 -----------------



           Exhibit No.             Description
           -----------             ----------- 

             99                    Collateral Term Sheet prepared by Chase
                                   Securities Inc. in connection with Chase
                                   Mortgage Finance Corporation, Multi-Class
                                   Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
                                   Series 1999-S2
### Part II—Conservation Security and Farmland Protection
§ 76.20 Consent Order or settlement prior to hearing. ( a ) *Generally.* At any time after the commencement of a proceeding, the parties jointly may move to defer the hearing for a reasonable time to permit negotiation of a settlement or an agreement containing findings and an order disposing of the whole or any part of the proceeding. The allowance of such deferment and the duration thereof shall be at the discretion of the Judge, after consideration of such factors as the nature of the proceeding, the requirements of the public interest, the representations of the parties, and the probability of reaching an agreement which will result in a just disposition of the issue involved. The Judge may require the parties to submit progress reports on a regular basis as to the status of negotiations.
( b ) *Consent orders.* Any agreement containing consent findings and an order disposing of a proceeding or any part thereof shall also provide: ( 1 ) That the order shall have the same force and effect as an order made after full hearing;
( 2 ) That the entire record on which any order may be based shall consist solely of the complaint or notice of administrative determination (or amended notice, if one is filed), as appropriate, and the agreement;
( 3 ) A waiver of any further procedural steps before the Judge; and
( 4 ) A waiver of any right to challenge or contest the validity of the order entered into in accordance with the agreement.
( c ) *Submission.* On or before the expiration of the time granted for negotiations, the parties or their counsel may: ( 1 ) Submit the proposed agreement containing consent findings and an order for consideration by the Judge; or
( 2 ) Notify the Judge that the parties have reached a full settlement and have agreed to dismissal of the action; or
( 3 ) Inform the Judge that agreement cannot be reached.
( d ) *Disposition.* In the event that an agreement containing consent findings and an order is submitted, the Judge, within thirty (30) days or as soon as practicable thereafter may, if satisfied with its timeliness, form, and substance, accept such agreement by issuing a decision based upon the agreed findings. The Judge has the discretionary authority to conduct a hearing to determine the fairness of the agreement, consent findings, and proposed order.
§ 54.415 Access to course offerings. ( a ) A recipient shall not provide any course or otherwise carry out any of its education program or activity separately on the basis of sex, or require or refuse participation therein by any of its students on such basis, including health, physical education, industrial, business, vocational, technical, home economics, music, and adult education courses.
( b ) ( 1 ) With respect to classes and activities in physical education at the elementary school level, the recipient shall comply fully with this section as expeditiously as possible but in no event later than one year from September 29, 2000. With respect to physical education classes and activities at the secondary and post-secondary levels, the recipient shall comply fully with this section as expeditiously as possible but in no event later than three years from September 29, 2000.
( 2 ) This section does not prohibit grouping of students in physical education classes and activities by ability as assessed by objective standards of individual performance developed and applied without regard to sex.
( 3 ) This section does not prohibit separation of students by sex within physical education classes or activities during participation in wrestling, boxing, rugby, ice hockey, football, basketball, and other sports the purpose or major activity of which involves bodily contact.
( 4 ) Where use of a single standard of measuring skill or progress in a physical education class has an adverse effect on members of one sex, the recipient shall use appropriate standards that do not have such effect.
( 5 ) Portions of classes in elementary and secondary schools, or portions of education programs or activities, that deal exclusively with human sexuality may be conducted in separate sessions for boys and girls.
( 6 ) Recipients may make requirements based on vocal range or quality that may result in a chorus or choruses of one or predominantly one sex.