alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 802.4 Guidelines for disclosure. ( a ) The authority to release, partially release, or deny access to records and information under the FOIA is limited to the Chief FOIA Officer, FOIA Public Liaison, and his or her designee.
( b ) An Agency record will be released in response to a written request, unless a valid legal exemption and/or exclusion to disclosure is asserted. ( 1 ) Any applicable exemption and/or exclusion to disclosure, which is provided under the FOIA in 5 U.S.C. 552, may be asserted. The applicable exemptions and/or exclusions to disclosure are as follows: ( i ) *Exclusions.* ( A ) Where the subject of a criminal investigation or proceeding is unaware of the existence of records concerning a pending investigation and disclosure of such records would interfere with the investigation.
( B ) Where there are informant records maintained by a criminal law enforcement agency and the individual's status as an informant is not known.
( C ) Where there are classified FBI records pertaining to foreign intelligence, counterintelligence or international terrorism records.
( ii ) *Exemptions.* ( A ) Information that is classified to protect national security.
( B ) Information related solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of an agency.
( C ) Information that is prohibited from disclosure by another federal law.
( D ) Trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is confidential or privileged.
( E ) Privileged communications within or between agencies, including: ( 1 ) Deliberative process privilege;
( 2 ) Attorney-work product privilege; and
( 3 ) Attorney-client privilege.
( F ) Information that, if disclosed, would invade another individual's personal privacy.
( G ) Information compiled for law enforcement purposes that: ( 1 ) Could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings.
( 2 ) Would deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or an impartial adjudication.
( 3 ) Could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
( 4 ) Could reasonably be expected to disclose the identity of a confidential source.
( 5 ) Would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions.
( 6 ) Could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical safety of any individual.
( H ) Information that concerns the supervision of financial institutions.
( I ) Geological information on wells.
( 2 ) A record must exist and be in the possession and control of the Agency at the time of the request to be considered subject to this part and the FOIA. There is no obligation to create, compile, or obtain a record to satisfy a FOIA request.
### §430h–14. Vicksburg National Military Park

#### (a) Acquisition of land

#### (1) In general

The Secretary of the Interior (referred to in this section as the "Secretary") may acquire the land or any interests in land within the area identified as "Modified Core Battlefield" for the Port Gibson Unit, the Champion Hill Unit, and the Raymond Unit as generally depicted on the map entitled "Vicksburg National Military Park—Proposed Battlefield Additions", numbered 306/100986A (4 sheets), and dated July 2012.

#### (2) Methods of acquisition

Land may be acquired under paragraph (1) by donation, purchase with donated or appropriated funds, or exchange, except that land owned by the State of Mississippi or any political subdivisions of the State may be acquired only by donation.

#### (b) Availability of map

The map described in subsection (a)(1) shall be on file and available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of the National Park Service.

#### (c) Boundary adjustment

On the acquisition of land by the Secretary under this section—

(1) the acquired land shall be added to Vicksburg National Military Park;

(2) the boundary of the Vicksburg National Military Park shall be adjusted to reflect the acquisition of the land; and

(3) the acquired land shall be administered as part of the Vicksburg National Military Park in accordance with applicable laws (including regulations).

(Pub. L. 113–291, div. B, title XXX, §3044, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3798.)
(54 South. 482.)

No. 18,653.

#### STATE v. HAMILTON.

(Feb. 27, 1911.)

*(Syllabus by the Court.)*

1. Criminal Law (§ 1020*) — Jurisdiction-Supreme Court — Appellate Jurisdiction —Criminal Cases — “Hard Labor.”

This court is without jurisdiction of the appeal in a criminal case where the offense charged is not punishable by death or imprisonment at hard labor (meaning hard labor in the State Penitentiary), and where no fine “exceeding” $300 and no imprisonment “exceeding” six months is “actually” imposed; and hence is without jurisdiction of the appeal in a case where the defendant, having been convicted of selling intoxicating liquors without having first obtained a license, is sentenced “to pay a fine of $300 and costs and be confined in the parish jail for a period of six months, subject to work on the public roads of the parish as provided by law, and, in default of the payment of the fine, that he be confined in the parish jail for an additional period of six months, subject to work on the public roads of the parish as provided by law.”

[Ed. -Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2578-2580; Dec. Dig. § 1020.*

For other definitions, see Words and Phrases, vol. 4, p. 3215.]

Appeal from Twelfth Judicial District Court, Parish of De Soto; Don E. So Relie, Judge.

Ishmael Hamilton was convicted of selling intoxicants without a license, and he appeals.

Dismissed.

Lee, Pegues & Atkinson, for appellant. Walter Guión, Atty. Gen., James G. Palmer, Dist. Atty. (G. A. Gondrán, of counsel), for the State.

MONROE, J.

Defendant was prosecuted upon a charge of selling spirituous and intoxicating liquors without having first obtained a license, and, having been convicted, was sentenced “to pay a fine of $300 and costs and be confined in the parish jail for a period of six months, subject to work on the public roads of the parish, as provided by law, and, in default of payment of the fine and costs, that he be confined in the parish jail for an additional period of six months, subject to work on the public roads of the parish as provided by law,” and he has appealed from the sentence.

The state moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that this court is without jurisdiction to entertain it. The appellate jurisdiction of this court extends in criminal cases to “questions of law alone, whenever the punishment of death or imprisonment at hard labor may be inflicted, or a fine exceeding $300 or imprisonment exceeding six months is actually imposed.”

The offense charged is not punishable by-death or imprisonment at hard labor (Rev. St. art. 910; Act No. 66 of 1902; Act No. 107 of 1902. § 8; Act No. 176 of 1908, § 3), the term “hard labor,” as used in the Constitution, referring to hard labor to be performed in the State Penitentiary. On the other hand, no fine “exceeding” $300 or imprisonment “exceeding” six months has been “actually” imposed. It is therefore adjudged and decreed'that the appeal herein be dismissed.
If you have asthma, 

flu can be a 

knockout punch.

Fight back—

get your flu shot.

If you have any kind of asthma, you could be at risk for 

serious complications from the flu. When you get your 

flu shot, you protect yourself and those around you.

For more information, visit: http://www.cdc.gov/flu

CS269326C
PET INFORMATION 

Pet name _____________________________________________________________________________

Breed _______________________________________ Color ___________________________________

Gender _____________________ Weight _________________ Microchip # ____________________

PET BOARDING INSTRUCTIONS

OWNER INFORMATION 

Your name ________________________________________________________________________________________

Your address ______________________________________________________________________________________

Your phone # ________________________________ Email address _______________________________________

Alternate phone # 1 ___________________________ Alternate phone # 2 __________________________________

FOOD AND MEDICATIONS 

Type of food _________________________________ ❑ Wet ❑ Dry Amount _______ Frequency __________

Name of medication _______________________________ Instructions ____________________________________

Name of medication _______________________________ Instructions ____________________________________

MEDICAL INFORMATION 

Veterinarian name ___________________________ Veterinarian phone # ___________________________________

Date of last rabies vaccine _____________________ Rabies certificate # _____________________________________

Date of last bordetella vaccine _________________ Date of last distemper/parvo vaccine ______________________

Date of last Heartworm test and result (dogs) ______________________________________________

Date of last FeLV/FIV test and result (cats) _________________________________________________

Current medical conditions _____________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

Behavior concerns ____________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

CS233670-B

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
#### § 6.4 Termination by implied surrender.

If any licensee holding a license subject to the provisions of section 10(i) of the Act shall cause or suffer essential project property to be removed or destroyed, or become unfit for use, without replacement, or shall abandon, or shall discontinue good faith operation of the project for a period of three years, the Commission will deem it to be the intent of the licensee to surrender the license; and not less than 90 days after public notice may in its discretion terminate the license.

[Order 141, 12 FR 8491, Dec. 19, 1947]
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

May 13, 2021

In the Matter of

Vilacto Bio, Inc.,

File No. 500-1

ORDER OF SUSPENSION OF

TRADING

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Vilacto Bio, Inc. (“VIBI1”) 

(CIK No. 1576724), a revoked Nevada corporation located in New York City, NY with a class of 

securities registered with the Commission pursuant to Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

("Exchange Act") Section 12(g) because it is delinquent in its periodic filings with the 

Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-Q for the period 

ended June 30, 2019. On December 17, 2020, the Commission’s Division of Corporation 

Finance (“Corporation Finance”) sent a delinquency letter to VIBI requesting compliance with 

its periodic filing requirements, which was delivered. As of April 1, 2021, the common stock of 

VIBI was quoted on OTC Link operated by OTC Markets Group Inc. (formerly “Pink Sheets”) 

(“OTC Link”), had six market makers, and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of 

Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11(f)(3).

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors 

require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company. Therefore, it is 

ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the 

 

1 The short form of each issuer’s name is also its stock symbol.
2

securities of the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on May 

14, 2021, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on May 27, 2021.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary
§ 42.710 General prohibition. ( a ) Subject to the exceptions discussed in §§ 42.711-42.713, no person in the United States shall, on the basis of age, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination in any program or activity to which this subpart applies. This prohibition applies to actions taken by a recipient, directly or through contractual or other arrangements, that have the purpose or effect of discriminating on the basis of age.
( b ) This prohibition encompasses treatment of elderly persons, children and any other age group. Unless one of the exception applies, the recipient may use neither a minimum age limit nor a maximum age limit in connection with receipt of benefits or services or other participation in a program or activity subject to this subpart.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 85769 / May 3, 2019

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-18492

In the Matter of 

PLAY LA INC. and

TITAN TRADING ANALYTICS, INC.

NOTICE THAT INITIAL DECISION HAS BECOME FINAL

The time for filing a petition for review of the initial decision in this proceeding has 

expired. No such petition has been filed by Play La Inc. or Titan Trading Analytics, Inc., and the 

Commission has not chosen to review the decision on its own initiative.

Accordingly, notice is hereby given, pursuant to Rule 360(d) of the Commission's Rules 

of Practice,1that the initial decision of the administrative law judge has become the final 

decision of the Commission with respect to Play La Inc. and Titan Trading Analytics, Inc.2The 

order contained in that decision is hereby declared final. The initial decision ordered that, 

pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrations of each class 

of registered securities of Play La Inc. and Titan Trading Analytics, Inc., are hereby revoked.

The revocations are effective as of May 6, 2019.

For the Commission, by the Office of the General Counsel, pursuant to delegated 

authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

 Acting Secretary

 

1

 17 C.F.R. § 201.360(d).

2

 Play La Inc. and Titan Trading Analytics, Inc., Initial Decision Release No. 1338 (Dec. 19, 

2018), 2018 WL 6695980. The Central Index Key numbers are: 1378553 for Play La Inc.; and 

1076639 for Titan Trading Analytics, Inc.
§ 83.200 What must I do to comply with this part? There are two general requirements if you are a recipient other than an individual. ( a ) First, you must make a good faith effort, on a continuing basis, to maintain a drug-free workplace. You must agree to do so as a condition for receiving any award covered by this part. The specific measures that you must take in this regard are described in more detail in subsequent sections of this subpart. Briefly, those measures are to— ( 1 ) Publish a drug-free workplace statement and establish a drug-free awareness program for your employees (see §§ 83.205 through 83.220); and
( 2 ) Take actions concerning employees who are convicted of violating drug statutes in the workplace (see § 83.225).
( b ) Second, you must identify all known workplaces under your Federal awards (see § 83.230).
#### § 522.20 Purpose and scope.

Bureau of Prisons staff screen newly arrived inmates to ensure that Bureau health, safety, and security standards are met.

[45 FR 44229, June 30, 1980]
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 8 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 

for an event to celebrate the birthday of King Kamehameha I. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 4, 2019 

Mr. SCHATZ (for himself and Ms. HIRONO) submitted the following concurrent 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol 

Visitor Center for an event to celebrate the birthday 

of King Kamehameha I. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR EVENT TO 

4 CELEBRATE BIRTHDAY OF KING KAMEHA5 MEHA I. 

6 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—Emancipation Hall in the 

7 Capitol Visitor Center is authorized to be used on June 

8 11, 2019, for an event to celebrate the birthday of King 

9 Kamehameha I. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 8 IS 

1 (b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the 

2 conduct of the event described in subsection (a) shall be 

3 carried out in accordance with such conditions as may be 

4 prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
• Separate yourself from others

• Rest & hydrate

• Social distance

• Wear a face covering

• Wash your hands 6 ft

If you test positive, stay home

What Your Test Results Mean

cdc.gov/coronavirus

CS 318104-A 07/08/2020

If you test negative, prevent getting sick by
### §3124. Regulations

The Secretary shall prescribe such regulations as are necessary and appropriate to carry out his responsibilities under this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 96–487, title VIII, §814, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2429; Pub. L. 105–83, title III, §316(b)(8), (d), Nov. 14, 1997, 111 Stat. 1594, 1595.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1997—Pub. L. 105–83, §316(b)(8), which directed amendment of section by inserting ", and the State at any time the State has complied with section 3115(d) of this title" after "The Secretary" and inserting at end "During any time that the State has complied with section 3115(d) of this title, the Secretary shall not make or enforce regulations implementing section 3115(a), (b), or (c) of this title.", was repealed by Pub. L. 105–83, §316(d). See Effective and Termination Dates of 1997 Amendment note below.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective and Termination Dates of 1997 Amendment

Until laws are adopted in Alaska which provide for definition, preference, and participation specified in sections 3113 to 3115 of this title, amendment by Pub. L. 105–83 was effective only for purpose of determining whether State's laws provide for such definition, preference, and participation, and such amendment was repealed on Dec. 1, 1998, because such laws had not been adopted, see section 316(d) of Pub. L. 105–83 set out as a note under section 3102 of this title.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6217

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ADAM NICKLOUS CARR,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,

Chief District Judge. (CR-01-126; CA-04-187-1)

Submitted: July 14, 2005 Decided: July 22, 2005

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Adam Nicklous Carr, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Cannon, Assistant

United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Adam Nicklous Carr seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Carr has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We also deny Carr’s pending motions for “disclosure of

grand jury minutes” and for an “extraordindary writ” under Fed. R.

App. P. 21(c). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
August 20 , 2015

Mr. Jacob A. Senior Representative for Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control Orlando Aviation Consultants, Inc. P

. O

. Box 621295 Orlando, FL 32862

Dear Mr. Senior :
This letter is to inform you that after further review of your request for exemption , in docket FAA

- 2015

- 1941 , your request does meet part § 11.81 requirements. Please disregard the rejection letter that was sent on August 14, 2015

. However, this information relates to docket FAA

- 2011

- 0741, and we have combined your requests into docket FAA

- 2011

- 0741.
If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely, /s/ Brittany Newton Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division
### §410y–6. Availability of funds; authorization of appropriations; adjustment of appropriations

(a) Any funds that may be available for purposes of administration of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal property may hereafter be used by the Secretary for the purposes of the park.

(b) There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this subchapter, not to exceed $28,400,000 for land acquisition and not to exceed $17,000,000 (1970 prices) for development, plus or minus such amounts, if any, as may be justified by reason of ordinary fluctuations in construction costs as indicated by engineering cost indices applicable to the types of construction involved herein.

(Pub. L. 91–664, §8, Jan. 8, 1971, 84 Stat. 1980; Pub. L. 95–625, title III, §320, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3488.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1978—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 95–625 substituted "$28,400,000" for "$20,400,000".
EXHIBIT 32.1


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gouverneur Bancorp Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
F. Bennett, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes -Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the
             Report.


August 11, 2004                        By: /s/ RICHARD F. BENNETT
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Richard F. Bennett
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

                                       25