alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 600.8 Notification and reports by the Special Counsel. ( a ) *Budget.* ( 1 ) A Special Counsel shall be provided all appropriate resources by the Department of Justice. Within the first 60 days of his or her appointment, the Special Counsel shall develop a proposed budget for the current fiscal year with the assistance of the Justice Management Division for the Attorney General's review and approval. Based on the proposal, the Attorney General shall establish a budget for the operations of the Special Counsel. The budget shall include a request for assignment of personnel, with a description of the qualifications needed.
( 2 ) Thereafter, 90 days before the beginning of each fiscal year, the Special Counsel shall report to the Attorney General the status of the investigation, and provide a budget request for the following year. The Attorney General shall determine whether the investigation should continue and, if so, establish the budget for the next year.
( b ) *Notification of significant events.* The Special Counsel shall notify the Attorney General of events in the course of his or her investigation in conformity with the Departmental guidelines with respect to Urgent Reports.
( c ) *Closing documentation.* At the conclusion of the Special Counsel's work, he or she shall provide the Attorney General with a confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions reached by the Special Counsel.
§ 51.4 Date used to determine coverage; list of covered jurisdictions. ( a ) The requirement of section 5 takes effect upon publication in the Federal Register of the requisite determinations of the Director of the Census and the Attorney General under section 4(b). These determinations are not reviewable in any court. (Section 4(b)).
( b ) Section 5 requires the preclearance of changes affecting voting made since the date used for the determination of coverage. For each covered jurisdiction that date is one of the following: November 1, 1964; November 1, 1968; or November 1, 1972.
( c ) The appendix to this part contains a list of covered jurisdictions, together with the applicable date used to determine coverage and the Federal Register citation for the determination of coverage.
CS 317702-B 07/08/2020

cdc.gov/coronavirus

HOW TO COLLECT YOUR ANTERIOR NASAL SWAB

SAMPLE FOR COVID-19 TESTING

Follow the instructions included with your sample kit. Use only materials provided in your kit to collect and store your sample, unless the kit says to do otherwise. 

Use only an approved sampling kit given to you by your healthcare provider (if you are at home) or by testing center personnel (if you are at a testing center).

1. Open the sampling kit. 

Follow the instructions

to label the sterile 

collection tube.

2. Wash your hands with 

soap and water for 

at least 20 seconds. 

If soap and water are 

not available, use hand 

sanitizer with at least 

60% alcohol.

Initial set-up

Sample collection

3. If gloves are included 

in the kit, put them 

on. Remove the swab 

from the container, 

being careful not to 

touch the soft end 

with your hands.

6. Gently remove 

the swab.

4. Insert the swab into 

your nostril. Do not 

insert it more than 

half an inch.

7. Using the same swab, 

repeat steps 4-6 in 

your other nostril.

5. Slowly twist the 

swab, rubbing it 

along the insides 

of your nostril for 

15 seconds.
cdc.gov/coronavirus

8. Place the swab in the 

sterile tube and snap 

off the end of the swab 

at the break line. Place 

the cap on the tube. 

13. Throw away remaining 

sample kit items.

11. If you are at a testing 

site, give the bag with 

the swab to testing 

personnel.

9. If you are wearing 

gloves, remove 

them and throw 

them away. Wash 

your hands or 

re-apply hand 

sanitizer.

14. Wash your hands 

or re-apply hand 

sanitizer.

OR

12. If you are 

home, 

follow kit 

instructions 

for storing, 

packaging, 

and shipping 

the sample.

Preparing sample for return

Returning the sample

Final clean-up

10. Place the sterile 

tube containing 

the swab in the 

biohazard bag 

provided and 

seal the bag.
Karen M. Crowley, VSB No. 35881 

CROWLEY, LIBERATORE, RYAN & BROGAN, P.C. 

Town Point Center, Suite 300 

150 Boush Street 

Norfolk, VA 23510 

Telephone: (757) 333-4500 

Facsimile: (757) 333-4501 

Counsel for the John T. Bianco

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

Norfolk Division 

In re: John T. Bianco, Case No. 15-73678-SCS 

 Chapter 11 

 Debtor-in-Possession. 

MTGLQ INVESTORS, L.P. 

 Movant, 

v. 

John T. Biano, 

 Respondent. 

RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO 

MTGLQ INVESTORS, L.P. MOTION SEEKING RELIEF FROM STAY 

 John T. Bianco (the “Debtor”), by counsel, in opposition to the Motion Seeking Relief from 

Stay (the “Motion”) filed by MTGLQ Investors, L.P. (“MTGLQ”) on July 28 2017, states as 

follows: 

1. Admitted. 

2. The Debtor denies the accuracy of the payoff and denies any default under the 

provisions of the confirmed plan. The Debtor admits that accurate copies of the loan 

documents are attached to the Motion. The Debtor denies MTGLQ’s characterization 

of the terms of the loan to the extent they are inconsistent with the documents. 

3. Admitted. 

4. Denied. The Debtor is current to the lien holder pursuant to the provisions of the plan 

confirmed by this Court. 

5. Denied. 

6. Denied. 

Case 15-73678-SCS Doc 127 Filed 08/11/17 Entered 08/11/17 13:13:41 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
7. Denied. 

 WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, the Debtor-in-Possession prays that this Court 

deny the Motion and grant him such other and further relief as is just and appropriate. 

DATE: August 11, 2017 JOHN T. BIANCO 

 BY: /s/ Karen M. Crowley 

 Of Counsel 

Karen M. Crowley, VSB No. 35881 

CROWLEY, LIBERATORE, RYAN & BROGAN, P.C. 

Town Point Center, Suite 300 

150 Boush Street 

Norfolk, VA 23510 

Telephone: (757) 333-4500 

Facsimile: (757) 333-4501 

Counsel for John T. Bianco

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I certify that on August 11, 2017, a true copy of the foregoing Response was 

electronically filed with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send e-mail 

notice of and serve such filing to those parties who are currently listed on the Electronic Mail 

Notice List for this Case. In addition, it was sent by first class mail to: 

David A. Rosen 

BUONASSISSI, HENNING & LASH 

1861 Wiehle Ave., Ste. 330 

Reston, VA 20190 

Office of the US Trustee 

Room 625, 200 Granby Street 

Norfolk, VA 23510

 /s/ Karen M. Crowley 

Case 15-73678-SCS Doc 127 Filed 08/11/17 Entered 08/11/17 13:13:41 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Luna Gold Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, David De Witt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 7th day of May, 2004.



| | /s/ David De Witt
David De Witt
Chief Executive Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------













---
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the
amended quarterly report of NMXS.com, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned principal executive officer and the principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  December
7, 2004





/s/ Richard Govatski

Richard Govatski, President

(Principal Executive Officer)





/s/ Teresa Dickey

Teresa Dickey, Treasurer

(Principal Financial Officer)
#### Harry Mohr, Respondent, v. Title Guarantee and Trust Company, Appellant.

*675Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.
### §410ww–1. Protection of historic properties

#### (a) Acquisition of properties within park

Within the boundaries of the park the Secretary shall, subject to the availability of appropriated funds, acquire Hawthorn Hill, the Wright Company factory, the Wright Cycle Company Building and Hoover Block, and may acquire other properties, or interests therein, referred to in section 410ww(b) of this title, by donation, purchase with donated or appropriated funds, exchange, or transfer.

#### (b) Cooperative agreements

The Secretary is authorized to enter into cooperative agreements with other Federal agencies, State and local public bodies, and private interests and organizations relating to the preservation, development, use, and interpretation of properties within the boundaries of the park in order to contribute to the appropriate use and management of such properties consistent with the purposes of this subchapter.

#### (c) Cooperative agreements

The Secretary is authorized to enter into a cooperative agreement with a partner or partners, including the Wright Family Foundation, to operate and provide programming for Hawthorn Hill and charge reasonable fees notwithstanding any other provision of law, which may be used to defray the costs of park operation and programming.

#### (d) Conditions

Cooperative agreements under this section shall provide, whenever appropriate, that—

(1) the public may have access to any such property at specified reasonable times for purposes of viewing such property or the exhibits or attending programs established by the Secretary under this subsection; and

(2) the Secretary may make such improvements to any such property as the Secretary deems necessary after consultation with the Aviation Heritage Foundation to enhance the public use and enjoyment of such property and programs.

(Pub. L. 102–419, title I, §102, Oct. 16, 1992, 106 Stat. 2142; Pub. L. 111–11, title VII, §7117(b), Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1204.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2009—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 111–11, §7117(b)(1), inserted "Hawthorn Hill, the Wright Company factory," before "the Wright Cycle Company Building".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 111–11, §7117(b)(2), redesignated last sentence as subsec. (d).

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 111–11, §7117(b)(3), added subsec. (c).

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 111–11, §7117(b)(2), redesignated last sentence of subsec. (b) as (d), inserted heading, and substituted "Cooperative agreements under this section" for "Such agreements" in introductory provisions.

Subsec. (d)(2). Pub. L. 111–11, §7117(b)(4), substituted "Aviation Heritage Foundation" for "Commission".
§ 115.11 Zero tolerance of sexual abuse and sexual harassment; PREA coordinator. ( a ) An agency shall have a written policy mandating zero tolerance toward all forms of sexual abuse and sexual harassment and outlining the agency's approach to preventing, detecting, and responding to such conduct.
( b ) An agency shall employ or designate an upper-level, agency-wide PREA coordinator with sufficient time and authority to develop, implement, and oversee agency efforts to comply with the PREA standards in all of its facilities.
( c ) Where an agency operates more than one facility, each facility shall designate a PREA compliance manager with sufficient time and authority to coordinate the facility's efforts to comply with the PREA standards.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahr a Bridget M. McCormac k
David F. Viviano
Richard H. Bernstei n Kurtis T. Wilde r Elizabeth T. Clement,
J ustices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at t he direction of the Court.

March 28, 2018

d0321 

# Order

Clerk 

### March 28, 2018

156522

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 156 522 COA: 331478 Wayne CC: 15-006214-FC DEZMEN FAQUA, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 27, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIE D, because we are not persuaded that the question pres ented should be reviewed by thi s Court.
### §3419. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–66, title I, §1011(q), Dec. 21, 1995, 109 Stat. 710

Section, Pub. L. 97–98, title XV, §1510, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1332, directed Secretary to submit reports to Congress concerning operation of special areas conservation program.
### §370a. Retention of Arlington Hotel site for park and landscape purposes

The site within the Hot Springs National Park fronting on Central Avenue and on Fountain Street, leased by the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to the authority of Act of August 24, 1912 (chapter 355, 37 Statutes 459) to the Arlington Hotel Company, and occupied by the hotel and bathhouse building of said company until it burned on April 5, 1923, shall upon the expiration on March 6, 1932, of the existing lease therefor with the said Arlington Hotel Company, be kept, retained, and maintained by the United States for park and landscaping purposes; and no new lease shall be granted by the Secretary of the Interior for the erection of another hotel, bathhouse, or other structure thereon.

(Feb. 14, 1931, ch. 180, 46 Stat. 1109.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act August 24, 1912 (chapter 355, 37 Statutes 459), as it related to lease of property at Hot Springs, Arkansas, referred to in text, was classified to section 370 of this title and was omitted from the Code as superseded by this section. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.
HomeLatest FilingsPrevious Page

    - SEC Home  »
    - Search the Next-Generation EDGAR System  »
    - Company Search  »
    - Current Page

C/O UBS ASSET MANAGEMENT (AMERICAS) INC.787 SEVENTH AVENUENEW YORK NY 10019         

C/O UBS ASSET MANAGEMENT (AMERICAS) INC.787 SEVENTH AVENUENEW YORK NY 10019         212-821-3000

PACE SELECT ADVISORS TRUST CIK#: 0000930007 (see all company filings)
State location: NY | State of Inc.: **DE** | Fiscal Year End: 0731formerly: MANAGED ACCOUNTS SERVICES PORTFOLIO TRUST (filings through 1998-01-09)formerly: PAINEWEBBER PACE SELECT ADVISORS TRUST (filings through 2002-06-28)formerly: UBS PACE SELECT ADVISORS TRUST (filings through 2010-10-29)Get **insider transactions** for this **issuer**.File Number: **812-15465**(List all Funds and Classes/Contracts for PACE SELECT ADVISORS TRUST)

||
||
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 		           	   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>				    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START> 			       JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>				         SEP-30-1999
<CASH>				      	              1,036
<SECURITIES>			      	             0
<RECEIVABLES>			       	      72,267
<ALLOWANCES>				                 647
<INVENTORY>					              11,396
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              87,084
<PP&E>					                   83,978
<DEPRECIATION>	       	      (45,815)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>        		     389,737
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>			     477,585
<BONDS>				                       	0
<COMMON>				         	     1,170,716
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           			0
<PREFERRED>					                   0
<OTHER-SE>					                    0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>	389,737
<SALES>					                  17,931
<TOTAL-REVENUES>	 		          17,931
<CGS>						                    2,623
<TOTAL-COSTS>			              	2,623
<OTHER-EXPENSES>				          37,443
<LOSS-PROVISION>				               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>		         	(5,820)
<INCOME-PRETAX>				          (28,001)
<INCOME-TAX>				                  (0)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>			             0
<DISCONTINUED>				                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>				                0
<CHANGES>					                     0
<NET-INCOME>			             	(28,001)
<EPS-BASIC>				              (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>			              	(0.06)


</TABLE>
§ 46.111 Criteria for IRB approval of research. ( a ) In order to approve research covered by this policy the IRB shall determine that all of the following requirements are satisfied: ( 1 ) Risks to subjects are minimized: ( i ) By using procedures which are consistent with sound research design and which do not unnecessarily expose subjects to risk, and
( ii ) whenever appropriate, by using procedures already being performed on the subjects for diagnostic or treatment purposes.
( 2 ) Risks to subjects are reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits, if any, to subjects, and the importance of the knowledge that may reasonably be expected to result. In evaluating risks and benefits, the IRB should consider only those risks and benefits that may result from the research (as distinguished from risks and benefits of therapies subjects would receive even if not participating in the research). The IRB should not consider possible long-range effects of applying knowledge gained in the research (for example, the possible effects of the research on public policy) as among those research risks that fall within the purview of its responsibility.
( 3 ) Selection of subjects is equitable. In making this assessment the IRB should take into account the purposes of the research and the setting in which the research will be conducted and should be particularly cognizant of the special problems of research involving vulnerable populations, such as children, prisoners, pregnant women, mentally disabled persons, or economically or educationally disadvantaged persons.
( 4 ) Informed consent will be sought from each prospective subject or the subject's legally authorized representative, in accordance with, and to the extent required by § 46.116.
( 5 ) Informed consent will be appropriately documented, in accordance with, and to the extent required by § 46.117.
( 6 ) When appropriate, the research plan makes adequate provision for monitoring the data collected to ensure the safety of subjects.
( 7 ) When appropriate, there are adequate provisions to protect the privacy of subjects and to maintain the confidentiality of data.
( b ) When some or all of the subjects are likely to be vulnerable to coercion or undue influence, such as children, prisoners, pregnant women, mentally disabled persons, or economically or educationally disadvantaged persons, additional safeguards have been included in the study to protect the rights and welfare of these subjects.
### §17h. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, act May 26, 1930, ch. 324, §9, 46 Stat. 383, related to hire, rental, and purchase of property of employees; when authorized. See section 101304(d) of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
J-S71026-14

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

Appellee

v.

DALIYL RAA’ID MUHAMMAD

Appellant No. 535 MDA 2014

Appeal from the PCRA Order February 11, 2014

In the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County

Criminal Division at No(s): CP-22-CR-0002967-2002

 CP-22-CR-0003009-2002

BEFORE: FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E., PANELLA, J., and FITZGERALD, J.

JUDGMENT ORDER BY PANELLA, J. FILED JANUARY 23, 2015

Appellant, Daliyl Raa’id Muhammad, is a serial PCRA petitioner and pro 

se motions filer. The instant petition—his fourth before this Court—was filed 

on May 31, 2013. Muhammad’s judgment of sentence became final on 

September 16, 2004, which date is thirty days after this Court affirmed his 

judgment of sentence. In this appeal, he claims that he has pled two 

exceptions to the time bar provided in 42 Pa.C.S.A. 9545(b), specifically 

subsections (i) and (ii). 

The bases for the exceptions are materials he received from “York 

County authorities on December 27, 2011,” and an “affidavit” from a fellow 

inmate, James Blackwell, which is dated April 20, 2011. The “affidavit” was a 

____________________________________________



Former Justice specially assigned to the Superior Court.
J-S71026-14

- 2 -

subject of Muhammad’s PCRA petition filed in 2011, see PCRA petition, filed 

May 23, 2011, at ¶15, and this Court explained why it does not constitute 

after-discovered evidence, see Commonwealth v. Muhammad, 1605 MDA 

2011, at 3 n.3 (Pa. Super., filed March 26, 2012) (unpublished 

memorandum). Muhammad obviously cannot now relitigate this issue in the 

current appeal. 

As for the December 27, 2011 materials, Muhammad did not file the 

instant petition containing this claim until May 31, 2013—318 days after this 

Court dismissed his previous petition. Muhammad had 60 days to file a 

petition containing this claim from the date of the order resolving his 

previous petition. See Commonwealth v. Lark, 746 A.2d 585, 588 (Pa. 

2000). Even assuming for the sake of argument that such a claim fits within 

an exception to the timeliness requirement, we note that it must fail, as it 

was not filed within sixty days of the date the claim could have been 

presented. See 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9545(b)(2); Commonwealth v. Geer, 936 

A.2d 1075, 1077 (Pa. Super. 2007). The PCRA court correctly determined 

that it was without jurisdiction to hear this untimely petition. 

Muhammad has filed in this Court a petition seeking a stay of this 

appeal pending a remand for an evidentiary hearing. We deny that motion.
J-S71026-14

- 3 -

Order affirmed. Motion for stay denied. Jurisdiction relinquished. 

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.

Prothonotary

Date: 1/23/2015
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2


   CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
   1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


For purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Herbert M. Mueller, the Chief Financial Officer
of Delta Apparel, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that to the best of his
knowledge:

         1.       The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
                  ended March 27, 2004 of the Company, as filed with the
                  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
                  "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Date:  May 6, 2004
                                                  /s/ Herbert M. Mueller
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Herbert M. Mueller
                                        Vice President & Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to Delta Apparel, Inc. and will be retained by Delta Apparel, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.