alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3932. Reports to Congress

#### (a) In general

The Secretary, in consultation and cooperation with the Secretary of Agriculture, shall prepare and submit to the committees—

(1) by March 30, 1987, a report regarding the status, condition, and trends of wetlands in the lower Mississippi alluvial plain and the prairie pothole regions of the United States; and

(2) by September 30, 1987, a report regarding trends of wetlands in all other areas of the United States.

#### (b) Contents of reports

The reports required under subsection (a) shall contain—

(1) an analysis of the factors responsible for wetlands destruction, degradation, protection and enhancement;

(2) a compilation and analysis of Federal statutory and regulatory mechanisms, including expenditures, financial assistance, and tax provisions which—

(A) induce wetlands destruction or degradation; or

(B) protect or enhance wetlands;

(3) a compilation and analysis of Federal expenditures resulting from wetlands destruction, degradation, protection or enhancement;

(4) an analysis of public and private patterns of ownership of wetlands;

(5) an analysis of the environmental and economic impact of eliminating or restricting future Federal expenditures and financial assistance, whether direct or indirect, which have the effect of encouraging the destruction, degradation, protection or enhancement of wetlands, including—

(A) public works expenditures;

(B) assistance programs such as price support programs, commodity loans and purchase programs and disaster assistance programs;

(C) soil conservation programs; and

(D) certain income tax provisions;

(6) an analysis of the environmental and economic impact of failure to restrict future Federal expenditures, financial assistance, and tax provisions which have the effect of encouraging the destruction, degradation, protection or enhancement of wetlands, including—

(A) assistance for normal silviculture activity (such as plowing, seeding, planting, cultivating, minor drainage, or harvesting for the production of fiber or forest products);

(B) Federal expenditures required incident to studies, evaluations, design, construction, operation, maintenance, or rehabilitation of Federal water resource development activities, including channel improvements;

(C) the commodity loans and purchases program and cotton, feed grain, wheat, and rice production stabilization programs administered by the Department of Agriculture; and

(D) Federal expenditures for the construction of publicly owned or publicly operated highways, roads, structures, or facilities that are essential links in a larger network or system; and

(7) recommendations for the conservation of wetlands resources based on an evaluation and comparison of all management alternatives, and combinations of management alternatives, such as State and local actions, Federal actions, and initiatives by private organizations and individuals.

(Pub. L. 99–645, title IV, §402, Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3589.)
CS 315822-X 09/17/2020

Men ko 10 kwōmaron kōmmane ilo mweo mom 

ñan kejbarok kakōlkōl in COVID-19 ko am 

Melele ko kwōmaron loi: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/if-you-are-sick/steps-when-sick.html

Elañe emaron wor ak emoj kamool ewor COVID-19:

1. Bed wot mweo mom 

im jab etal in jerbal im 

jikuul. jerbal im jikuul. 

Im jab etal ñan jikin ko 

ilobelej. N̄e kwōmaron̄, jab 

uwe ilo jabdrewōt wa ewor 

armij in ilobelej iloan, uwe 

ibben ro jet, ak tāākji ko.

2. Lukkun lale kakōlkōl 

ko am. Elañe enana lok 

kakōlkōl ko am, kirlok 

takto eo am ilo ien eo wot. 

3. Kakkije im idaak 

aiboj. 

4. Elañe emoj am 

karōke juon ien am 

takto, kirlok takto 

eo mokta jen ien 

eo im ba ñane ke 

ewor ak emaron wor 

COVID-19 ibbam.

5. Ñan idin takto 

ko, kirlok 911 im 

kōjellaik rijerbal 

ro rej kōmadmōd 

ke ewor ak emaron 

wor COVID-19 ibbam.

6. Kalbubu am 

bokbok im maje 

kin juon tissue ak ñan 

iloan jimwin beim.

7. En ikut aṃ kwal 

beimkin joob im dren 

enjab driklok jen 20 jekon 

ak karreoiki beim kin juon 

kein manman kij ilo ba 

(hand sanitizer) ej kōmman 

jen arkool im ejab driklok 

jen 60% arkool. 

8. Ilo joñan wot am maron, 

bed wot ilo juon ruum 

im ettolok jen ro jet ilo 

mweo mom. Im bareinwot, 

kwōj aikuj kōjerbal juon 

imōn kabōjak ejenollok, 

ñe kwōmaron. Elañe kwōj 

aikuj bed iturin armij ro 

jet ilo mweo mom ak ro 

rejab jokwe mweo mom, 

kōnaake juon nuknuk ej 

kalbubuij mejam.

9. Jab kōjerbal men ko 

an juon make armij 

ibben ro jet ilo mweo 

mom, einwot kano ko, 

tool ko, im kein kiki ko.

10. Karreo aoleben jikin 

ko ekut jibwi einwot ioon 

counter ko, tabol, im kein 

kōbellok kajem ko. Kōjerbal 

būtik ak kein irir in karreo 

ko ekkar ñan kōmelele ko 

emoj likit ilo bato eo. 

cdc.gov/coronavirus
Date(s) of 

invalid data Summary of reson invalidated

01/04/2005

02/15/2005

02/21/2005

02/27/2005

03/05/2005

03/29/2005

01/28/2005 1 sample invalidated due to under run

02/03/2005 1 sample invalidated due to over run

1 90 15 7 47 22.1 80

For Q1, less than 50% data complete, no substitution done

If substitution was done the value of 80 would be used.

Average 

PM10 

(ug/m^3)

Max 24-

hour 

Sample

6 samples invalidated due issues with 

the weighing system / lab error

Summary of Payson Q1 2005 Invalid data

2005 Summary Statistics - PM10 Standard Conditions

Quarter No. of Days in Quarter

No. of 

Possible 

Samples

No. of 

Actual 

Samples

% Data 

Complete

ness
24 0

2nd 

Highest 

Sample

No. of 

Actual 

Exceedan
#### § 41.54 Employment criteria.

A recipient may not use employment tests or criteria that discriminate against handicapped persons and shall ensure that employment tests are adapted for use by persons who have handicaps that impair sensory, manual, or speaking skills.
Order entered November 30, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00530-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF I.F., E.F. AND F.F., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-19-21932

ORDER

As directed by this Court, appellant has provided written verification that he 

has filed a Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs in the trial 

court. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145(b). Accordingly, we ORDER Court Reporter 

Yolanda Atkins to file the reporter’s record without payment of costs WITHIN 

THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. 

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. 

Atkins and all parties.

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN

JUSTICE
FY 2020 Service Contract Inventory 

Planned Analysis of FY 2021 Inventory

As required by OMB’s FY 2021 Service Contract Inventory Checklist, the SEC has 

selected the following PSCs for its FY 2021 inventory. The SEC selected three (3) PSCs. 

None of the selected PSCs were included in the FY 2020 review.

PSC Codes for Planned Analysis

PSC Product or Service 

Description

Dollars 

Obligated in 

FY 2021

Rationale for Selection

DA01 IT and Telecom –

Business Application/ 

Application 

Development Support 

Services (Labor)

$30,861,716.00 PSC selected because it is a new 

PSC which consolidates and 

replaces other IT/Telecom PSCs. It 

is also the fifth largest spend with 

5% of SEC obligations. 

D317 IT and Telecom – WebBased Subscription$25,318,832.00 PSC selected because it is the 

sixth largest spend with 4% of SEC 

obligations. It has not been 

reviewed previously. 

R707 Support – Management: 

Contract/ Procurement/ 

Acquisition Support

$1,300,000.00 PSC selected because it has not 

been reviewed since 2015, and it is 

a special interest function.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  SBA Leadership 
-  Robert Yannuzzi 

#   Robert Yannuzzi

Assistant Administrator

Office of Veterans Business Development

Robert Yannuzzi serves as the Assistant Administrator for the Office of Veterans Business Development (OVBD). 

In this role, he provides strategic direction and oversight on OVDB programs, policies, and initiatives for the SBA Administrator and other key officials. Robert oversees the OVBD team in developing and implementing policies and programs that equip veterans, servicemembers (active duty, National Guard, Reserve), and military spouse-owned small businesses with counseling and education, access to capital, and contracting opportunities.

Prior to the SBA, he worked in both state and local government as Mayor of Eddystone, Pennsylvania, Council Vice-president of Eddystone, Pennsylvania, Chief of Staff for Pennsylvania State Representative David M. Delloso, and Constituent Service Advisor to Pennsylvania State Representative Jennifer O’Mara. He also served on the Pennsylvania State Democratic Committee and served as the Secretary of the Veterans Caucus.

Robert has first-hand military experience, having served in the United States Navy as an enlisted submarine sailor. He served as a Missile Technician on the Louisiana (Blue Crew) where he worked with Trident II submarine-launched ballistic missiles. After receiving an honorable discharge, Robert went on to work with local Veteran Service Organizations and as the Program Coordinator for CompeerCORPS in Delaware County, Pennsylvania. He has made it his life’s work to help veterans reintegrate and achieve the ambitions they set out to accomplish. 

Robert was the recipient of a 2024 Freedom Medal, awarded by the Delaware County Veterans Memorial Association, for his accomplishments in service, dedication to the country, and his local community.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Sportman�s guide to theClearwater River [electronic resource].**
A 1|A 2|
 
SuDoc Number:I 53.7/2:C 58

Item Number: 0633 (online)

CGP systemNumber:000951063 
October 29, 2018
### **CHAPTER 99—MARITIME SECURITY AND FISHERIES ENFORCEMENT**

Sec.
8001.
Definitions.
8002.
Purposes.
8003.
Statement of policy.

#### SUBCHAPTER I—PROGRAMS TO COMBAT IUU FISHING AND INCREASE MARITIME SECURITY

8011.
Coordination with international organizations.
8012.
Engagement of diplomatic missions of the United States.
8013.
Assistance by Federal agencies to improve law enforcement within priority regions and priority flag states.
8014.
Expansion of existing mechanisms to combat IUU fishing.
8015.
Improvement of transparency and traceability programs.
8016.
Technology programs.
8017.
Savings clause.
8018.
Capacity building in foreign fisheries.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—ESTABLISHMENT OF INTERAGENCY WORKING GROUP ON IUU FISHING

8031.
Interagency Working Group on IUU fishing.
8032.
Strategic plan.
8033.
Reports.
8034.
Gulf of Mexico IUU Fishing Subworking Group.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS

8041.
Authorization of appropriations.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Spring Valley  Management
Corp., on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the
undersigned, B. Stephen Bailey, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 38 

To establish the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies 

for the inauguration of the President-elect and Vice President-elect of 

the United States on January 20, 2021. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 6, 2020 

Mr. BLUNT (for himself and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) submitted the following 

concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

To establish the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural 

Ceremonies for the inauguration of the President-elect 

and Vice President-elect of the United States on January 

20, 2021. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF JOINT COMMITTEE. 

4 There is established a Joint Congressional Committee 

5 on Inaugural Ceremonies (in this resolution referred to as 

6 the ‘‘joint committee’’) consisting of 3 Senators and 3 

7 Members of the House of Representatives, to be appointed 

8 by the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 38 ATS 

1 House of Representatives, respectively. The joint com2 mittee is authorized to make the necessary arrangements 

3 for the inauguration of the President-elect and Vice Presi4 dent-elect of the United States on January 20, 2021. 

5 SEC. 2. SUPPORT OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE. 

6 The joint committee— 

7 (1) is authorized to utilize appropriate equip8 ment and the services of appropriate personnel of 

9 departments and agencies of the Federal Govern10 ment, under arrangements between the joint com11 mittee and the heads of those departments and 

12 agencies, in connection with the inaugural pro13 ceedings and ceremonies; and 

14 (2) may accept gifts and donations of goods 

15 and services to carry out its responsibilities. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
grant a continuance, see Evans, 117 Nev. at 638, 28 P.3d at 518 (the

district court does not abuse its discretion "absent a showing that the State acted in bad faith or that the nondisclosure caused substantial prejudice to the defendant"), we conclude that these claims lack merit.

Second, Robbins argues that his conviction for first-degree kidnapping with the use of a deadly weapon cannot stand because it was incidental to the underlying robbery. We disagree. The jury heard evidence that either Robbins or his accomplice attacked the victim with a crowbar, shocked him with a taser, and bound his wrists with an electrical cord. The victim was held down and beaten further by one of the suspects while the other removed goods from the home. After the victim told the suspects where his wallet was, either Robbins or his accomplice forced the victim upstairs—away from the open front door—and stated that he was going kill him. The jury was properly instructed pursuant to Mendoza v. State, 122 Nev. 267, 275-76, 130 P.3d 176, 181 (2006), and we conclude that a rational juror could have found that the kidnapping was not incidental to the robbery, see Langford v. State, 95 Nev. 631, 638-39, 600 P.2d 231, 236-37 (1979) (where adequately instructed, the question of whether the movement of the victim is incidental to the robbery is "to be determined by the jury in all but the clearest cases").

Third, relying on NRS 50.075, Robbins argues that the district court abused its discretion by restricting him from cross-examining the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department's Forensic Laboratory technician who performed the DNA testing in this case regarding mistakes and malfeasance committed by other lab technicians. "The decision to admit or exclude evidence rests within the trial court's discretion, and this court will not overturn that decision absent manifest error." Collman v.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 2

9.arraguirre J.

ETZE IEA - - • '' - 41: , .4 1 • - II r • r=

State, 116 Nev. 687, 702, 7 P.3d 426, 436 (2000). Here, the district court prohibited this line of questioning because the witness had no personal knowledge of the specific instances of mistakes and malfeasance committed by other technicians, but allowed the defense to cross-examine her regarding the potential for human error generally. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. See NRS 50.025(1)(a).

Having considered Robbins' contentions and concluded that they lack merit, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

/ .e.e...40t.. \ Hardesty

CHERRY, J., concurring:

I concur in the result.
J. erry
cc: Hon. Carolyn Ellsworth, District Judge The Law Office of Dan M. Winder, P.C. Mario D. Valencia Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 3
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-10161

ANGELO PRIETO,

Trustee of the Brett M Davis

Insurance Trust;

BRETT M DAVIS, Individually

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE

INSURANCE COMPANY;

JIM ENGRAM, Individually;

JIM ENGRAM & ASSOCIATES

Defendants - Appellees,

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas

(No. 3:97-CV-2441-L)

April 17, 2002

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s granting summary

judgment on their various state-law claims and on their federal

racketeering amd securities law claims. Under any of these
-2-

claims, the limitations period is not longer than four years. 

Plaintiffs sue for misrepresentations allegedly made in the

course of their purchasing an insurance policy in 1983. They

claim, however, that Defendants obscured the facts on which they

now sue until after the limitations periods ran. The district

court, in a comprehensive and well-considered opinion, concluded

that Plaintiffs had actual knowledge of Defendants’

misrepresentations by 1987 and that Plaintiffs’ claims were timebarred by 1991. We affirm.

Both the discovery rule and the doctrine of fraudulent

concealment toll applicable statutes of limitations until the

claimant discovers or with reasonable diligence should have

discovered facts that could support a cause of action. See

Colonial Penn Ins. v. Market Planners Ins. Agency, 157 F.3d 1032,

1034-35 (5th Cir. 1998)(discussing both rules). A plaintiff need

not discover each element of her cause of action before the

limitations period begins to run. Instead, it protects her only

until she ought to know facts that would lead a reasonable person

to investigate the possible existence of a cause of action. In

this case, it is not disputed that Plaintiffs by 1987 knew that

Defendant Engram’s previous representations that the policy

dividends were guaranteed and that the interest rate on policy

loans was fixed were false. At that point, the statute of

limitations began to run, for Plaintiffs knew they had causes of
-3-

action for breach of contract, fraud, and negligent

misrepresentation, among others. Engram’s continuing insistence

that the policy would perform as illustrated in the face of these

discoveries cannot again toll the limitations period until the

next instance of wrongdoing was discovered. Knowing that Engram

had misled them in the past, reasonable claimants in Plaintiffs’

position would sue to have the policy amended in accordance with

Engram’s promises. At a minimum, they should have carefully

investigated any further promises he made.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FORM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, STATEMENT OF INCOME, and STATEMENT OF CASHFLOW AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-1998
<CASH>                                        $411,559
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  262,117
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,134
<INVENTORY>                                    293,245
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               995,591
<PP&E>                                       1,241,537
<DEPRECIATION>                                 552,056
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,004,598
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          346,571
<BONDS>                                        515,251
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        72,745
<OTHER-SE>                                     981,575
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,004,598
<SALES>                                      1,394,294
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,431,365
<CGS>                                        1,011,447
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,320,284
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,892
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    94
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,820
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 66,275
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             56,475
<DISCONTINUED>                                  32,591
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   $89,046
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $1.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $1.50
        

</TABLE>