T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

D a r d e n c o n s e n te d to p r o c e e db e f o r e am a g is tr a te ju d g e . See 2 8 U . S. C. ** § 6 36 (c ). T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on * ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T GE R AL DI NE KE L L E Y D AR DE N, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. MOHA MM E D A R AI N, D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 12- 17814 D. C . No . 1 : 1 2 - c v - 0 0 6 6 3 - S KO ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia S he i l aK . O be rt o, M a gi s tr a t e J udge , P r e s i di ng ** S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r24, 2013 *** B efo re: R A W L IN S O N , N . R . S M IT H , an dC H R IS T E N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C a l i f orni as t a t e pr i s one rG e r a l di ne K e l l e yD a r de n appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e ntdi s m i s s i ng he r42 U . S . C . § 1983 a c t i on a l l e gi ng 

# FI LED OC T 04 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 17814 2 del i bera t e i nd i ff

er ence t o h erse ri ou s m edi ca l needs. W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e r e vi e w de novo the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s di s m i s s a l unde r28 U .S .C . § § 1 9 1 5 A a n d 1 9 1 5 ( e ) ( 2 ) ( B ) ( ii) . R es ni ck v. H ayes , 2 1 3 F .3 d4 4 3 , 4 4 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) ; B arr e n v . H arr i ngton , 1 5 2 F .3 d1 1 9 3 , 1 1 9 4 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 8 ) ( o r d e r ) . W e a f f irm . T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt p r o p e r lyd is m is s e dD a r d e n ’s a c tio n b e c au s e D a r d e n d id no tal l ege f

ac t s s ho w i ng thatdefe nd antac t ed w i th d el i bera t e i nd i ff er ence w hen p erfo rm i n g th e l u m p ect o m y o r resp o n d i n g t o D ard en ’ s m ed i cal n eed s. See T oguc hiv . Chung , 3 9 1 F .3 d1 0 5 1 , 1 0 5 7 - 5 8 , 1 0 6 0 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) ( d e lib e r a te i ndi f f e r e nc e i s ahi gh l e ga l s t a nda r d, a nd i ti s m e tonl yi f the de f e nda ntknow s of an d d i sreg ard s an ex cessi v e ri skt o th e p ri so n er’ s h eal th an dsafety; m i st ak es, negl i gence or m alprac t i ce do no tri se t o an E i gh th A m endm entvi ol at i on ). T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng D a r de n’ s m ot i on f or appo i ntm entof coun se l because D ar den fai l ed t o d em on stra t e e xcept i on al c ir c u m s ta n c e s . See P alm erv. V aldez , 560 F . 3d 965, 970 ( 9th C i r . 2009) ( s e tt i ng f orth s t a nda r d of

r e vi e w a nd “ e xc e pt i ona l c i r c um s t a nc e s ” r e qui r e m e ntf or appo i ntm entof coun se l ). T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on bydi s m i s s i ng the a c t i on w i thoutf i r s tpr ovi di ng a n opportuni tyt o a m e nd a f t e rc onc l udi ng tha ta m e ndm e nt12- 17814 3 w o u ldb e f

u tile . Se e L o

p ezv . Sm ith , 20 3 F . 3d 11 22 , 11 30 (9th C i r. 20 00 ) ( en banc) ( s e ttin g f o rth s ta n d a r d o f

r e v ie w a n de x p la in in g th a t d is m is s a l w ith o u t le a v e to am end i s app ropri at e w here the pl ea di ng cann otbe cured by al l egi ng other f ac t s) . D ar den’ s c on t ent i on s c on ce rni ng al l eged deni al of du e proces s and equal a c c e s s a r e unpe r s ua s i ve a nd nots upport e d bythe r e c or d. D a r de n’ s m ot i ons t o a dd the l e ga l pr i nc i pl e of r e s j udi c a t a , f

i l e d on F eb ru ary 6 , 2 0 1 3 an d M arch 1 9 , 2 0 1 3 , are d en i ed as u n n ecessary. AF F I RME D.