alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of wwbroadcast.net inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Marcel de Groot, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 14th day of August, 2003.



| | /s/ Marcel de Groot
Marcel de Groot 
Chief Financial Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------------
### §366. Collection of water on reservation

The authority conferred upon the Secretary of the Interior to collect the hot water upon said Hot Springs National Park shall be so construed as to require water to be collected only where such collection is necessary for its proper distribution, and not where by gravity the same can be properly utilized.

(Mar. 3, 1891, ch. 533, §6, 26 Stat. 844; Mar. 4, 1921, ch. 161, §1, 41 Stat. 1407.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Hot Springs National Park" substituted in text for "Hot Springs Reservation" pursuant to act Mar. 4, 1921.
### §410ww–7. Assistance

#### (a) Technical and preservation assistance

The Secretary may provide to any owner of property within the park, and to any organization having an agreement with the Secretary under section 410ww–1(b) of this title, such technical assistance as the Secretary considers appropriate to carry out the purposes of this subchapter.

#### (b) Grant assistance

The Secretary is authorized to make grants to the parks' partners, including the Aviation Trail, Inc., the Ohio Historical Society, and Dayton History, for projects not requiring Federal involvement other than providing financial assistance, subject to the availability of appropriations in advance identifying the specific partner grantee and the specific project. Projects funded through these grants shall be limited to construction and development on non-Federal property within the boundaries of the park. Any project funded by such a grant shall support the purposes of the park, shall be consistent with the park's general management plan, and shall enhance public use and enjoyment of the park.

#### (c) Interpretative materials

The Secretary is authorized to publish interpretative materials for historic aviation resources in the Miami Valley.

(Pub. L. 102–419, title I, §108, Oct. 16, 1992, 106 Stat. 2143; Pub. L. 111–11, title VII, §7117(c), Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1204.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2009—Subsecs. (b), (c). Pub. L. 111–11 added subsec. (b) and redesignated former subsec. (b) as (c).
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Administrative Proceedings Rulings

Release No. 6837 / January 5, 2022

Administrative Proceeding

File No. 3-20454

In the Matter of

Kimberly D. Butler,

Prosperity Economics Partners, 

LLC, and

Partners for Prosperity, LLC

Order Granting Motion to 

Postpone Hearing

On January 4, 2022, the parties filed a joint motion to postpone the 

hearing and associated deadlines for 90 days. The parties believe that this 

extension may allow them to resolve by negotiation the only remaining issue 

in the proceeding. After considering the factors in 17 C.F.R. § 201.161(b), I find 

good cause to grant the parties’ motion. In light of the timing requirements in 

17 C.F.R. § 201.360(a)(2)(ii), no further extensions will be granted on this 

basis.

I ORDER the following revised schedule: 

April 11, 2022: Exchange and file witness and exhibit lists.

May 2, 2022: File prehearing briefs.

File motions in limine, including any objections to 

witness and exhibit lists.

File stipulations, admissions of fact, and requests for 

official notice.

Deadline for requests under Rule 232 for subpoenas 

requiring the attendance and testimony of a witness 

at the hearing.

May 9, 2022: Final telephonic prehearing conference.
2

May 16, 2022: Hearing begins, either virtually or in person at a 

location to be determined in Texas.

/s/ James E. Grimes

Chief Administrative Law Judge
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 20, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-50949

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

REYNALDO VELASQUEZ-DURAN, also known

as Juan Reynaldo Bernal-Gomez,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. P-02-CR-9-ALL

--------------------

Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Reynaldo Velasquez-Duran appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United

States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Velasquez-Duran complains that his sentence was improperly

enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) based on a prior

conviction. He argues that the sentencing provision is

unconstitutional. Velasquez-Duran thus contends that his
No. 02-50949

-2-

sentence should not exceed the maximum terms of imprisonment

prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Velasquez-Duran acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
### **CHAPTER 23—NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM**

Sec.
1131.
National Wilderness Preservation System.
1132.
Extent of System.
1133.
Use of wilderness areas.
1134.
State and private lands within wilderness areas.
1135.
Gifts, bequests, and contributions.
1136.
Annual reports to Congress.
### §430w. Administration, protection, and development

The administration, protection, and development of the aforesaid national battlefield park shall be exercised under the direction of the Secretary of the Interior by the National Park Service subject to the provisions of the Act of August 25, 1916, entitled "An Act to establish a National Park Service, and for other purposes",1 as amended.

(June 26, 1935, ch. 315, §4, 49 Stat. 424.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Act of August 25, 1916, entitled "An Act to establish a National Park Service, and for other purposes", referred to in text, is act Aug. 25, 1916, ch. 408, 39 Stat. 535, known as the National Park Service Organic Act, which enacted sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 of this title and provisions set out as a note under section 100101 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs. Sections 1 to 4 of the Act were repealed and restated as section 1865(a) of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and section 100101(a), chapter 1003, and sections 100751(a), 100752, 100753, and 102101 of Title 54 by Pub. L. 113–287, §§3, 4(a)(1), 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3094, 3260, 3272. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables. For disposition of former sections of this title, see Disposition Table preceding section 100101 of Title 54.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

1 See References in Text note below.
### §§404c–5 to 404c–9. Repealed. June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §39, 62 Stat. 992, eff. Sept. 1, 1948

Section 404c–5, acts June 5, 1942, ch. 341, §5, 56 Stat. 318; Apr. 21, 1948, ch. 223, §3, 62 Stat. 196, related to appointment and jurisdiction of commissioner. See provisions covering United States magistrate judges in section 631 et seq. of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

Section 404c–6, act June 5, 1942, ch. 341, §6, 56 Stat. 319, related to issuance of process. See sections 3041 and 3141 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and rules 4, 5(c), and 9 of Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Title 18, Appendix.

Section 404c–7, act June 5, 1942, ch. 341, §7, 56 Stat. 319, related to commissioner's [now magistrate judge's] salary. See section 634 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

Section 404c–8, act June 5, 1942, ch. 341, §8, 56 Stat. 319, related to fees, costs, and expenses against United States. See section 604 of Title 28.

Section 404c–9, act June 5, 1942, ch. 341, §9, 56 Stat. 319, related to disposition of fines and costs. See section 634 of Title 28.
#### § 1308.16 Decisions involving fraudulent claims.

If a Contracting Officer denies any part of a Contractor's claim for lack of support, and the Contracting Officer is of the opinion that the Contractor's inability to support that part of the claim is within § 1308.6 and section 5 of the Act, the Contracting Officer's decision shall not state that opinion, but, contemporaneously with the decision, the Contracting Officer shall separately notify TVA's General Counsel of that opinion and the reasons therefor.
I CAN’T MISS WORK 

BECAUSE OF THE FLU.

Every year, I get my flu vaccine to protect 

myself, my coworkers, and my family 

from getting sick from the flu. 

Even healthy people can get the flu, 

and it can be serious. This season, 

protect yourself and those around you 

by getting a flu vaccine.

For more information, visit 

http://www.cdc.gov/flu

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

CS226283-C
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 39 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed export to the United Arab Emirates and United Kingdom 

of certain defense articles, including technical data and 

defense services. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the issuance of an export license with respect to the 

4 following proposed export to the United Arab Emirates 

5 and United Kingdom is prohibited: 

6 (1) The transfer to the United Arab Emirates 

7 and United Kingdom of the following export of cer8 tain defense articles, including technical data and 

9 defense services, described in Executive Communica10 tion 1426 (EC–1426) submitted to Congress pursu11 ant to section 36(c) of the Arms Export Control Act 

12 (22 U.S.C. 2776(c)) and published in the Congres13 sional Record on June 3, 2019: The proposal to 

14 amend a technical assistance agreement to support 

15 the installation, integration, modification, mainte-
2 

†SJ 39 ES 

1 nance, and repair of F110–GE–132 gas turbine en2 gines for use in F–16 Aircraft by the General Head3 quarters of the Armed Forces of the United Arab 

4 Emirates. 

Passed the Senate June 20, 2019. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 39 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the procluding technical data and defense services. United Kingdom of certain defense articles, in- posed export to the United Arab Emirates and
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Harvey Electronics, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended October 29, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Franklin C. Karp,
Chief Executive Officer and President, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
     of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









/s/ Franklin C. Karp
------------------------
Franklin C. Karp
Chief Executive Officer and President
January 27, 2006
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 27, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80902-80903]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-33006]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY FOR THE DISTRICT OF 
COLUMBIA

Senior Executive Service; Performance Review Board; Members

AGENCY: Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District 
of Columbia.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Section 4314(c) of Title 5, U.S.C. (as amended by the Civil 
Service Reform Act of 1978) requires each agency to establish, in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel 
Management, one or more Performance Review Boards (PRB) to review, 
evaluate and make a final recommendation on performance appraisals 
assigned to individual members of the agency's Senior Executive 
Service. The PRB established for the Court Services and Offender 
Supervision Agency (CSOSA), including the District of Columbia Pretrial 
Services Agency, an independent entity within CSOSA, also makes 
recommendations to the agency head regarding SES performance awards, 
rank awards and bonuses. Section 4314(c)(4) requires that notice of 
appointment of Performance Review Board members be published in the 
Federal Register.
    The following persons have been appointed to serve as members of 
the Performance Review Board for the Court Services and Offender 
Supervision Agency: Thomas Williams, Jasper Ormond, Cedric Hendricks, 
James Williams, Linda Mays, William Kirkendale, Susan Shaffer, Clifford 
Keenan, and Leslie Cooper.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tonya Turner, Deputy Associate 
Director for Human Resources, Court Services and Offender Supervision 
Agency, 655 15th Street NW., Suite 800, Washington, DC 20005, (202) 
220-5477.

[[Page 80903]]

    Dated: December 20, 2011.
Cedric Hendricks,
Acting Director.
[FR Doc. 2011-33006 Filed 12-21-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3129-01-M
```
§ 36.606 Effect of certification. ( a ) ( 1 ) A certification shall be considered a certification of equivalency only with respect to those features or elements that are both covered by the certified code and addressed by the standards against which equivalency is measured.
( 2 ) For example, if certain equipment is not covered by the code, the determination of equivalency cannot be used as evidence with respect to the question of whether equipment in a building built according to the code satisfies the Act's requirements with respect to such equipment. By the same token, certification would not be relevant to construction of a facility for children, if the regulations against which equivalency is measured do not address children's facilities.
( b ) A certification of equivalency is effective only with respect to the particular edition of the code for which certification is granted. Any amendments or other changes to the code after the date of the certified edition are not considered part of the certification.
( c ) A submitting official may reapply for certification of amendments or other changes to a code that has already received certification.
( d ) When the standards of the Act against which a code is deemed equivalent are revised or amended substantially, a certification of equivalency issued under the preexisting standards is no longer effective, as of the date the revised standards take effect. However, construction in compliance with a certified code during the period when a certification of equivalency was effective shall be considered rebuttable evidence of compliance with the Standards then in effect as to those elements of buildings and facilities that comply with the certified code. A submitting official may reapply for certification pursuant to the Act's revised standards, and, to the extent possible, priority will be afforded the request in the review process.
[Order No. 1513-91, 56 FR 35592, July 26, 1991, redesignated and amended by AG Order No. 3181-2010, 75 FR 56258, Sept. 15, 2010]
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 18 - 00177 - CV IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF SHANNON OLIVER AND R ICHARD OLIVER On Appeal from the 12th District Court Walker County, Texas 1 Trial Court No. D1314898, Honorable Donald Kraemer, Presiding



### June 19 , 2018 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PARKER , JJ. Appellant , Richard Oliver, filed a notice of appeal from the Final Decree of Divorce on March 13, 2018. The clerk’s record was due on April 10, 2018, but was not filed. On May 10 , 2018, the district clerk notified the Clerk of this Court that Oliver had not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 35.3(a)(2). By letter of May 11, 2018 , we directed Oliver to make acceptable payment arrangements for the

1 By order of the Texas Supreme Court, this appeal was transferred from the Tenth Court of Appeals to this Court . See T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 73.001 ( West 2013) .2

clerk’s record by May 21 . Failure to do so, we admonished , would subject the appeal to di smissal for want of prosecution. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 37.3(b). To date, Oliver has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record or filed any response to the Court’s letter . Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution and because O liver fail ed to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules and an order of the Court . T EX . R. A PP . P . 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c). Per Curiam
§ 541.41 Institutional referral. ( a ) The Warden shall submit a recommendation for referral of an inmate for placement in a control unit to the Regional Director in the region where the inmate is located.
( b ) The Warden shall consider the following factors in a recommendation for control unit placement. ( 1 ) Any incident during confinement in which the inmate has caused injury to other persons.
( 2 ) Any incident in which the inmate has expressed threats to the life or well-being of other persons.
( 3 ) Any incident involving possession by the inmate of deadly weapons or dangerous drugs.
( 4 ) Any incident in which the inmate is involved in a disruption of the orderly operation of a prison, jail or other correctional institution.
( 5 ) An escape from a correctional institution.
( 6 ) An escape attempt. Depending on the circumstances, an escape attempt, considered alone or together with an inmate's prior history, may warrant consideration for a control unit placement.
( 7 ) The nature of the offense for which committed. An inmate may not be considered solely on the nature of the crime which resulted in that inmate's incarceration; however, the nature of the crime may be considered in combination with other factor(s) as described in paragraph (b) of this section.
( c ) The Warden may not refer an inmate for placement in a control unit: ( 1 ) If the inmate shows evidence of significant mental disorder or major physical disabilities as documented in a mental health evaluation or a physical examination;
( 2 ) On the basis that the inmate is a protection case, e.g., a homosexual, an informant, etc., unless the inmate meets other criteria as described in paragraph (b) of this section.
##### 



Exhibit 12.01
  HARTFORD
    LIFE INSURANCE CO.
  COMPUTATION
    OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND EARNINGS
    TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK
    DIVIDENDS
  YTD


YTD


YTD


YTD


YTD12/31/06


12/31/05


12/31/04


12/31/03


12/31/02(In millions)Earnings


834



1,116



1,012



794



428Add:Fixed chargesInterest expense


















Interest factor attributable to
    rentals


4



5



6



6



7Total fixed charges


4



5



6



6



7Interest credited to
    contractholders


1,706



1,679



1,658



1,055



974Total fixed charges including
    interest credited to contractholders


1,710



1,684



1,664



1,061



981Earnings, as defined


838



1,121



1,018



800



435Earnings, as defined, including
    interest credited to contractholders


2,544



2,800



2,676



1,855



1,409Fixed chargesFixed charges above


4



5



6



6



7Dividends on subsidiary preferred
    stock


















Total fixed charges and
    preferred dividend requirements


4



5



6



6



7Total fixed charges, interest
    credited to contractholders and preferred dividend
    requirements


1,710



1,684



1,664



1,061



981RatiosEarnings, as defined, to total
    fixed charges


209.5



224.2



169.7



133.3



62.1Earnings, as defined, to total
    fixed charges and preferred dividend requirements


209.5



224.2



169.7



133.3



62.1Earnings, as defined, including
    interest credited to contractholders, to total fixed charges
    including interest credited to contractholders


1.5



1.7



1.6



1.7



1.4Earnings, as defined, including
    interest credited to contractholders, to total fixed charges
    including interest credited to contractholders and preferred
    dividend requirements


1.5



1.7



1.6



1.7



1.4