alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SERVED: October 12, 2016 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT4tf~t1ENTOF 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, DC l'att. OCT ... 13 p ll: liS 

In The Matte Of: ) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

DOCKET OPERATIONS 

Docket No. FAA-2013-1079 

JETTECH, L C 

Case No. 2012NM030058 

Respondent 

NOTICE OF HEARING 

Pursuant o 14 C.P.R.§ 13.205(a)(l) and§ 13.221, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. 

2. 

3. 

a. T e hearing will be held at the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 90119th 

S reet, Denver, CO 80294. 1 

b. B · efcases, purses, packages, and other items will be subject to search upon entry to 

th building. All individuals must present a valid government-issued I.D. to enter. 

a. e hearing will begin on May 16,2017. 

b. T e courtroom is reserved through May 18,2017. 

a. T e hearing will begin at 9:00 a.m. local time and end by 4:00 p.m. each day. 

b. T e parties shall vacate the courthouse by 5:00p.m. each day. 

Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment: Service List 

1 As of the dat of this notice, a courtroom has not yet been assigned. Parties should check the Court Calendar on 

the day of the earing for the exact courtroom or check with the Clerk's Office. 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviati n Administration 

800 lndepende ce Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, C 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10002 

ONE COPY 

Michael L. Po'ndexter, Respondent's Counsel 

Law Offices o Michael L. Poindexter 

2132 Montane Drive E. 

Golden, CO 8 401 

TEL: 303-52 -1980 

FAJ(: 303-52 -1981 

Kyle E. Lorn ow, Complainant's Counsel 

Office ofRegi nal Counsel, Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviati n Administration 

1601 Lind Av nue, S.W. 

Renton, W A 9 057 

TEL: 425-22 -1847 

FAJ(: 425-22 -1007 

The Honorabl Douglas M. Rawald, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHe 'ngs, M-20 

U.S. Departm nt of Transportation 

1200 New Jer ey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, C 20590 

TEL: 202-3 6-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-3 6-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2013-1079 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

2 Service was b U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Admin'stration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Atte tion: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
### Part A—El Malpais National Monument
Wear a face mask that 

covers your nose and mouth. 

And keep your distance (at 

least 6 feet) from others 

when you can. 

Wash your hands often with 

soap and water. If soap and 

water aren’t available, use 

an alcohol-based hand 

sanitizer.

Getting a flu vaccine is 

more important than ever. 

Everyone 6 months and 

older should get a flu 

vaccine every season. 

Your work is essential!

Protect yourself & others from flu and COVID-19 this fall and winter:

MASK UP LATHER UP SLEEVE UP

Learn more at cdc.gov/flu

CS319348D

A flu vaccine can protect you, your loved ones, and your co-workers from flu.

You can also protect those around you by staying home if you are sick.
#### Anna J. Doyle, Respondent, v. Bertha Sommer et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Present — Close, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
If you live with or care 

for someone at high risk 

for serious complications 

from seasonal influenza, 

you should get a seasonal

flu vaccine. Groups at 

high risk include kids 

and adults with chronic 

medical conditions like 

asthma and diabetes.

We’ll BOTH Get Our Flu Vaccines.

My Little Boy Has Asthma.

CS212299-M

For more information, visit http://www.flu.gov or http:www.cdc.gov/flu
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

507 

KA 08-02218 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND GREEN, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

ROBERT ELLISON, ALSO KNOWN AS ROBERT ELLISON, 

JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (ERIC M. DOLAN OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

MICHAEL C. GREEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (STEPHEN X. O’BRIEN OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County

(Francis A. Affronti, J.), rendered March 18, 2008. The judgment

convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first

degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Entered: April 29, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
#### § 551.36 Funding.

The Bureau of Prisons may fund approved activities of inmate organizations or organization requests for purchase of equipment or services for all inmates subject to the availability of designated funds.
#### § 80.10 Rebuttable presumption.

In any action brought under the applicable provisions of 15 U.S.C. 78dd-1 and 78dd-2, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that a requestor's conduct, which is specified in a request, and for which the Attorney General has issued an opinion that such conduct is in conformity with the Department's present enforcement policy, is in compliance with those provisions of the FCPA. Such a presumption may be rebutted by a preponderance of the evidence. In considering the presumption, a court, in accordance with the statute, shall weigh all relevant factors, including but not limited to whether information submitted to the Attorney General was accurate and complete and whether the activity was within the scope of the conduct specified in any request received by the Attorney General.
### §410jj–2. Boundaries; revisions of boundary; publication in Federal Register

The boundaries of the park shall include the lands, waters, and interests therein within the area generally depicted on the map entitled "Boundary Map, Kalaupapa National Historical Park", numbered P07–80024, and dated May 1980, which shall be on file and available for public inspection in the local and Washington, District of Columbia offices of the National Park Service, Department of the Interior. The Secretary of the Interior (hereinafter referred to as the "Secretary") may make minor revisions in the boundary of the park by publication of a revised boundary map or other description to that effect in the Federal Register.

(Pub. L. 96–565, title I, §103, Dec. 22, 1980, 94 Stat. 3321.)
CS 314937-W 04/30/2020

cdc.gov/coronavirus

ንባዕልኹምንካልኦትን ንምክልኻል ብዛዕባ

COVID-19 ክትፈልጥዎ ዘለኩምነገር

ብዛዕባ COVID-19 ፍለጡ

• ኮሮናቫይረስ (COVID-19) ካብ ሰብ ናብ

ሰብ ክመሓላለፍ ካብ ዝኽእል ዝመጸ ቫይረስ እዩ።

• እዚ COVID-19 ዘስዕብ ቫይረስ ሓድሽ ኣብ መላእ

ዓለም ዝተሰራጨወ ኮሮናቫይረስ እዩ።

• ናይ COVID-19 ምልክታት ካብ ቀሊል

(ወይ ምንም ምልክት) ክሳብ ከቢድ ይበጽሑ።

COVID-19 ከመይ ከምዝሰራጮፍለጡ

• ምስ ብ COVID-19 ዝሓመመ ሰብ ብቐረባ ብምንኽኻእ

(ኣብ ውሽጢ 6 ጫማ ወይ ክልተ ክንዲ ርሕቐት

ውሽጢ) በቲ ቫይረስ ክትልከፉ ትኽእሉ። COVID-19 

ካብ ሰብ ናብ ሰብ እዩ ዝመሓላለፍ።

• ዝተለኸፈ ሰብ ክስዕል፣ ክሀንጥስ ወይ ክዛረብ ከሎ

ካብ ኣፉ ብዝወጹ ፈሰስቲ በቲ ቫይረስ ክትልከፉ

ትኽእሉ።

• እቲ ቫይረስ ዘለዎ ቦታ ወይ ኣቕሓ ብምንካእ፣ ድሕሪኡ

ድማ ኣፍኩም፣ ኣፍንጫኹም ወይ ዓይኒኹም

ብምንካእ እቲ ቫይረስ ክሕዘኩም ይኽእል።

ባዕልኹምንካልኦትንካብ COVID-19 

ተከላኸሉ

• ኣንጻር COVID-19 ንምክልኻል ኣብዚ ግዘ እዚ ክትባት

የለን። ንባዕልኹም ትከላኸሉሉ ዋና መገዲ ነቲ

COVID-19 ዘስዕብ ቫይረስ ዘይምቅላዕ እዩ።

• ምስ ካልኦት ሰባት ናይ ቀረባ ንኽክእ ንምውጋድ

ብዝተኸኣለኩም መጠን ኣብ ገዛኹም ጽንሑ።

• ኣብ ሰብ ዝበዝሐሉ ቦታ እንትኾኑ ኣፍንጫኦምን

ኣፎምን ዝሽፍን ናይ ገፅ ኽዳን ይግበሩ።

• ዝኾነ ሰብ ዝተንከፎ ነገር ከምእውን ግዳማዊ ዝኾነ

ነገር ደጋጊምኩም ኣጽርይዎን ኣምክንዎን።

• ኣእዳውኩም ብተደጋጋሚ ብሳሙናን ማይን እንተንኢሱ

20 ሰኮንድታት ተሓጸቡ፣ ወይ ኣልኮል መሰረት ዝገበረ

እንተንኢሱ 60% ኣልኮል ዘለዎ ናይ ኢድ ሳኒታይዘር

ተጠቐሙ።

milk

ሓፈሻዊ ርሕቐት ተግብር

• ግሮሰሪን መድሓኒትን ንምግዛእ፣

ናብ ዶክተር ክትከዱ ከለኹም፣ ናይ

ባንኪ ንጥፈታትኩም እንተኽኢልኩም

ብኦንላይን ኣጠናቕቑ።

• ብኣካል ክትከዱ እንተሃሊኩም፣

እንተንኢሱ 6 ጫማ ካብ ካልኦት ሰባት

ርሓቑ እትነኽእዎም ነገራት ድማ

ዲስኢንፌክት ግበሩ።

• ናብ ገዛኹም ዝበጽሑልኩምን

ዝውሰዱ ነገራትን ርኸቡ፣

ብዝተኸኣለኩም መጠን ድማ

ብኣካል ምርኻብ ኣወግዱ። 

እንተሓሚምኩምናይ

COVID-19 ምስርጫው

ተኸላኸሉ

• ምስ እትሓሙ፣ ናይ ሕክምና

ኣገልግሎት ንምርካብ

እንተዘይኮይኑ፣ ብኻልእ ምኽንያት

ካብ ገዛ ከይትወጹ።

• ህዝባዊ መጎዓዓዝያ፣ ብሓባር

ዝግበር መጎዓዓዝያ፣ ወይድማ ታክሲ

ካብ ምጥቃም ተቆጠቡ።

• ኣብ ውሽጢ ገዛኹም ካብ ዝርከቡ

ሰባትን እንስሳታትን ርሓቑ።

• ን COVID-19 መድሓኒት የብሉን፣

ምልክታትኩም ንምቕናስ ድማ ናይ

ሕክምና ሓገዝ ምርካብ ትኽእሉ።

• ሕክምና እንተድሊኩም፣ ቀዲምኩም

ደውሉ።

ንከቢድ ሕማምዘለኩም

ተቓላዒነት ፍለጡ

• ኩሉ ሰብ COVID-19 ተቓላዒ እዩ።

• ዕድምኦም ዝደፍኡ ዓበይቲ ሰባትን

ሕዱር ናይ ጥዕና ኩነታት ዘለዎም

ኣብ ዝኾነ ዕድመ ዘለዉ ሰባት

ንከቢድ ብኮሮናቫይረስ ሕማም

2019 (COVID-19) ዝመጽእ ሕማም

ተጋለጽቲ እዮም።
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 883 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 883

To provide for the unencumbering of title to non-Federal land owned by 
Win Oil Company, Inc., for purposes of economic development by removing 
 the Federal reversionary interest in the land, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 26, 2019

Ms. McSally (for herself and Ms. Sinema) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the unencumbering of title to non-Federal land owned by 
Win Oil Company, Inc., for purposes of economic development by removing 
 the Federal reversionary interest in the land, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Flagstaff Federal Reversion Relief 
Act''.

SEC. 2. RELEASE OF FEDERAL REVERSIONARY INTEREST, FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA.

    Any land (including the parcel of land located in the City of 
Flagstaff, Arizona, owned by Win Oil Company, Inc., and more 
particularly described in the deed recorded in Coconino County, 
Arizona, on November 11, 1998, as document number 98-44431) that is 
subject to a Federal reversionary interest pursuant to the Act of July 
27, 1866 (14 Stat. 292, chapter 278), shall no longer be subject to the 
Federal reversionary interest described in that Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 511.18 When Bureau staff can arrest and detain a non-inmate. ( a ) You may be arrested and detained by Bureau staff anytime there is probable cause indicating that you have violated or attempted to violate applicable criminal laws while at a Bureau facility, as authorized by 18 U.S.C. 3050.
( b ) “Probable cause” exists when specific facts and circumstances lead a reasonably cautious person (not necessarily a law enforcement officer) to believe a violation of criminal law has occurred, and warrants consideration for prosecution.
( c ) Non-inmates arrested by Bureau staff under this regulation will be physically secured, using minimally necessary force and restraints, in a private area of the facility away from others. Appropriate law enforcement will be immediately summoned to investigate the incident, secure evidence, and commence criminal prosecution.
### §8701. Declaration of policy

#### (a) Purpose

The purpose of this chapter is to authorize the establishment of an orderly program for developing, financing, and carrying out an effective, continuous, and coordinated program of research, education, and promotion, including funds for marketing and market research activities, that is designed to—

(1) strengthen the position of the concrete masonry products industry in the domestic marketplace;

(2) maintain, develop, and expand markets and uses for concrete masonry products in the domestic marketplace; and

(3) promote the use of concrete masonry products in construction and building.

#### (b) Limitation

Nothing in this chapter may be construed to provide for the control of production or otherwise limit the right of any person to manufacture concrete masonry products.

(Pub. L. 115–254, div. E, §1302, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3469.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 115–254, div. E, §1301, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3469, provided that: "This division [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Concrete Masonry Products Research, Education, and Promotion Act of 2018'."
Docket No: FAA-2015-8465 Dir ID: 2014-NM-239-AD

. Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 

Organization Person Contacted Date Response 

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 12/5/14

Regional Airline Association 12/5/14

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 12/5/14

ATA Joe White 12/5/14
### §38. Exchange for State or private lands authorized

The Secretary of Agriculture is authorized in his discretion to accept, on behalf of the United States, title to any lands held in private or State ownership within the townships described in section 37 of this title, and in exchange therefor may patent not to exceed an equal value of national forest land in the State of Montana, surveyed and nonmineral in character, or the Secretary of Agriculture may authorize the grantor to cut and remove not to exceed an equal value of timber within the national forests of said State, the values in each case to be determined by the Secretary of Agriculture: Provided, That before any such exchange is effected, notice of the contemplated exchange reciting the lands involved shall be published once each week for four successive weeks in some newspaper of general circulation in the county or counties in which may be situated the lands to be accepted and in some like newspaper published in any county in which may be situated any lands or timber to be given in such exchange. Timber given in exchange shall be cut and removed from national forests under the laws and regulations relating to the national forests and under the direction and supervision and in accordance with the requirements of the Secretary of Agriculture.

(May 26, 1926, ch. 399, §2, 44 Stat. 655; Pub. L. 86–509, §1(f), June 11, 1960, 74 Stat. 205.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of Secretary of the Interior under this section, with respect to exchanges of lands held in private or State ownership for national forest lands or timber in Montana, transferred to Secretary of Agriculture, see Pub. L. 86–509, June 11, 1960, 74 Stat. 205, set out as a note under section 2201 of Title 7, Agriculture.
#### § 401.22 Concept of the program.

The Water Resources Program, as defined and described in section 13.2 of the Compact, will be a reasonably detailed amplification of that part of the Comprehensive Plan which the Commission recommends for action. That part of the Program consisting of a presentation of the water resource needs of the Basin will be revised only at such intervals as may be indicated to reflect new findings and conclusions, based upon the Commission's continuing planning programs.

[89 FR 51825, June 20, 2024]
#### §§ 35.141-35.148 [Reserved]
§ 115.13 Supervision and monitoring. ( a ) The agency shall ensure that each facility it operates shall develop, document, and make its best efforts to comply on a regular basis with a staffing plan that provides for adequate levels of staffing, and, where applicable, video monitoring, to protect inmates against sexual abuse. In calculating adequate staffing levels and determining the need for video monitoring, facilities shall take into consideration: ( 1 ) Generally accepted detention and correctional practices;
( 2 ) Any judicial findings of inadequacy;
( 3 ) Any findings of inadequacy from Federal investigative agencies;
( 4 ) Any findings of inadequacy from internal or external oversight bodies;
( 5 ) All components of the facility's physical plant (including “blind-spots” or areas where staff or inmates may be isolated);
( 6 ) The composition of the inmate population;
( 7 ) The number and placement of supervisory staff;
( 8 ) Institution programs occurring on a particular shift;
( 9 ) Any applicable State or local laws, regulations, or standards;
( 10 ) The prevalence of substantiated and unsubstantiated incidents of sexual abuse; and
( 11 ) Any other relevant factors.
( b ) In circumstances where the staffing plan is not complied with, the facility shall document and justify all deviations from the plan.
( c ) Whenever necessary, but no less frequently than once each year, for each facility the agency operates, in consultation with the PREA coordinator required by § 115.11, the agency shall assess, determine, and document whether adjustments are needed to: ( 1 ) The staffing plan established pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section;
( 2 ) The facility's deployment of video monitoring systems and other monitoring technologies; and
( 3 ) The resources the facility has available to commit to ensure adherence to the staffing plan.
( d ) Each agency operating a facility shall implement a policy and practice of having intermediate-level or higher-level supervisors conduct and document unannounced rounds to identify and deter staff sexual abuse and sexual harassment. Such policy and practice shall be implemented for night shifts as well as day shifts. Each agency shall have a policy to prohibit staff from alerting other staff members that these supervisory rounds are occurring, unless such announcement is related to the legitimate operational functions of the facility.
No. 20,587.

#### Dennis Eugene Cullen *v.*The People of the State of Colorado, on the Petition of Verna Baer in the Interests of Dennis Cecil Cullen.

(383 P. [2d] 316)

Decided July 8, 1963.

*532Mr. Nicholas Magill, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. 'Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General, Mr. Frank E. Hickey, Deputy, Mr. Thomas A. Nelson, Jr., Assistant, for defendant in error.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Justice Day

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The Attorney General of the State of Colorado confesses error in this matter and admits that the county court of Routt County was without jurisdiction to entertain the dependency proceedings before it.

It is shown by the record that this proceeding was instituted by Verna Baer, a resident of Routt County, attempting to have the county court of that county determine the dependency of a minor who was living in Moffat County. Custody of the child had been awarded to his father in a divorce action in Mesa County, and the legal residence of the child was with his father in that county although he had been placed with others in Moffat County.

The child, therefore, was neither physically present in Routt County nor was his legal place of residence in Routt County.

The relevant statutes are C.R.S. ’53, 22-1-2 and 3. The jurisdiction of county courts in dependency actions has been discussed by this court in *Hudson v. Mattingley,*69 Colo. 528, 195 Pac. 113; *Peterson v. Schwartzmann,*116 Colo. 235, 179 P. (2d) 662; *Geisler v. People,*135 Colo. 121, 308 P. (2d) 1000. The statute and the cases reveal that the court committed error in refusing to grant the motion of the plaintiff in error to dismiss the proceedings on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded to *533the trial court to vacate all orders issued herein and to dismiss the action.

Mr. Justice McWilliams not participating.
### §430h–8. Park interpretation

In administering Vicksburg National Military Park, the Secretary shall interpret the campaign and siege of Vicksburg from April 1862 to July 4, 1863, and the history of Vicksburg under Union occupation during the Civil War and Reconstruction.

(Pub. L. 101–442, title I, §103, Oct. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 1020.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          54,441
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,338
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,692
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,229
<PP&E>                                          45,190
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,062
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 111,129
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,208
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           128
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,717
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   111,129
<SALES>                                         54,424
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                54,424
<CGS>                                           48,215
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,215
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 125
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,581
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,607
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,974
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,974
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
        

</TABLE>
### §410aaa–43. Transfer of lands

On October 31, 1994, the Secretary shall transfer the lands under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management depicted on the maps described in section 410aaa–42 of this title, without consideration, to the administrative jurisdiction of the Director of the National Park Service. The boundaries of the public lands shall be adjusted accordingly.

(Pub. L. 103–433, title V, §503, Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4490.)
#### John Dorbin, Plaintiff-Appellee, *vs.*Yellow Cab Company, *et al.,*Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 54898;

First District

August 13, 1971.

Julius Jesmer, Charles E. Tannen, of Chicago, (Jesmer & Harris, of counsel,) for appellant.

Robert E. Cleveland, of Chicago, for appellee.

Mr. JUSTICE LORENZ

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an action for personal injuries allegedly sustained by plaintiff in a collision of plaintiff’s automobile and defendant’s taxicab.

The complaint was filed November 18, 1966. On December 29, 1989, on defendant’s motion the suit was dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to answer interrogatories. On January 27, 1970, the court entered an order vacating the dismissal order of December 29, 1969, directing plaintiff to file his answers to the interrogatories within fourteen days and setting trial for April 6, 1970.

Defendant seeks to appeal from the order of January 27, 1970. Plaintiff has moved this court to dismiss the appeal, for the reason that the order is not appealable.

In *Stoller Lumber Co. v. Cosmopolitan Nat. Bank*(1988), 101 Ill.App. 2d 431 the court said: “Section 50(5) of the Civil Practice Act provides that the court may on motion filed within thirty days after entry thereof, set aside any final order, judgment or decree upon any terms and conditions that shall be reasonable. There is no appeal from an order entered pursuant to this section. See City of Park Ridge v. Murphy, 258 Ill. 365, 101 N.E. 524; Natale v. Enterprise Pub. Co., 82 Ill.App.2d 105, 227 N.E.2d 84, and Tinkoff v. Wharton, 344 Ill.App. 40, 99 N.E.2d 915. The order vacating the decree, entered within thirty days from the entry of the decree, was interlocutory and not appealable. Therefore the appeal is dismissed.”

*114The order appealed from was an interlocutory nonappealable order and the appeal must therefore be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

ENGLISH, P. J. and DRUCKER, J., concur.
#### § 548.11 Definition.

For purposes of this subpart, the term “religious activity” includes religious diets, services, ceremonies, and meetings.