alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE RESTATED
             ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC. 1991 INCENTIVE STOCK PLAN
                        (AS AMENDED AND RESTATED IN 1999)


         THIS  AMENDMENT,  made and entered into on November 17, 1999, by ALLIED
WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC., a Delaware corporation ("Employer").

                                R E C I T A L S:

         1.       The Employer maintains the Allied Waste Industries, Inc. 1991
                  Incentive  Stock  Plan   ("Plan"),  as  amended  and  restated
                  effective September 8, 1999, and as later amended;

         2.       The Employer has reserved the right to amend the Plan in whole
                  or in part; and

         3.       The Employer intends to amend the Plan, with the approval   of
                  its stockholders.

         THEREFORE, the Employer hereby adopts this Amendment,  subject   to the
         approval of the Employer's stockholders, as follows:

         1.       In Section 3, the first  sentence of  the second  paragraph is
                  amended by changing the  referenced percentage from  "8.5%" to
                  "8.0%."

         2.       Section 6(b) is revised by adding the  following  new sentence
                  to that Section:  "Notwithstanding  any other provision of the
                  Plan  to  the  contrary, no  amendment  or  adjustment  of the
                  exercise price of an  Option   (whether   through   amendment,
                  cancellation or  replacement Grants, or other means of pricing
                  such Options) in respect of an Option having an exercise price
                  greater than the Fair Market  Value  of a Share as of the date
                  of such amendment or adjustment shall be authorized under  the
                  Plan  unless   stockholder   approval  of  such  repricing  is
                  obtained."

         3.       The  Effective  Date  of  this  Amendment shall be the date on
                  which this  Amendment  is  approved by the stockholders of the
                  Employer.


<PAGE>

         4.       Except  as amended, all of the terms  and  conditions  of  the
                  Plan shall remain in full force and effect


                                       ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.,
                                        a Delaware corporation




                                       By     /s/ Steven M. Helm
                                             ---------------------------------
                                               Steven M. Helm, Vice President
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of  Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this amendment no. 1 to annual report on Form 10-K/A of Energy, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:




---



##### 



5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
    /s/ Richard M. OsborneRichard M. OsborneChairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive
Officer)
# IA_SEC_-_FIRM_DOWNLOAD_-_209793
Editorial Note on Part 284
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 284 appear at 65 FR 10222, Feb. 25, 2000.

§ 284.101 Applicability. This subpart implements section 311(a)(1) of the NGPA and applies to the transportation of natural gas by any interstate pipeline on behalf of: ( a ) Any intrastate pipeline; or
( b ) Any local distribution company.
ስለበሽታውለህፃናት መንገር፡፡

ልጅህወረርሽኙንለመቋቋምሊያደርገው በሚችለው ነገርና ወረርሽኙን ወደ ሌሎች እንዳያዛመት ማድረጉ 

ላይ ማተኮር አለብህ፤

ልጅህየእንፍሉዌንዛክትባትእንዲሰጠው 

አድርግ፡፡ መርፌ ሲወጋ ሊጠዘጥዘው 

ይችላል ይሁን እንጂ በኋላ ከመታመም 

ይታደገዋል፡፡ በአፍንጫ የሚነፋ የወረርሽኝ 

መከላከያም ለማግኘት ይቻላል፡፡

በታመሙበትወቅትበሶፍትወይም በጨርቅ 

ላይእንዲያስሉ ወይም እንዲያስነጥሱ 

አበረታታቸው፡፡ የተጠቀሙበትን ጨርቅ ወይም 

ሶፍት ወደ ቆሻሻ ማጠራቀሚያ ወርውር፡፡ 

ሶፍት ለጊዜው ማግኘት ባይችሉ አፋቸውንና 

አፍንጫቸውን በእጃቸው መሸፈን አለባቸው፡

ልጆችወደታመሙሰዎችእንዳይጠጉ 

አድርግ

እጆቻቸውንደጋግመውበሳሙናና ሞቅ ባለ 

ውሀከ15 እስከ 2ዐ ሰኮንዶች ድረስ እንዲታጠቡ 

አበረታታቸው፡፡ በዚህ ረገድ አንተው ራስህ 

በመታጠብ አርአያ ሁናቸው፡

በታመሙበትወቅትወደስራ ወይም ወደ ትምህርት ቤት 

እንዳይሄዱ አበረታታቸው፡፡ ህመሙ እስኪለቃቸው 

ድረስ ከሰዎች እርቀው እንዲገኙ እርዳቻው፡፡

CS 217339/2010 1

ኢንፍሉዌንዛ(ወረርሽኝ) ልጅህ በወረርሽኙ በሚጠቃበት ወቅት

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2

የዩናትድእስቴትስየጤናጥበቃናሰብአዊ እርዳታ አገልግሎቶችመምሪያ

የበሽታ መከላከያና መቆጣጠሪያ ማእከል

ኢንፍሉዌንዛ(ወረርሽኝ) ልጅህ በወረርሽኙ በሚጠቃበት ወቅት

ለበለጠመረጃየበሽታመከላከያ ማእከልን በ8ዐዐ-ሲዲሲ- ኢንፎ (232-4636) ቴሌፎን ወይም በwww.cdc.gov/flu ድረ-ገጽ ተጠቀም

ጤናማልምዶችንአበረታታ፡፡ ጤናማ ምግቦችንመውሰድ፣ በቂ እንቅልፍና የአካል እንቅስቃሴ ማድረግ፡፡

የሚያቀርቧቸውንጥያቄዎችበመመርኮዝ በሽታውንእንዴት እንደሚከላከሉትና ወረርሽኙና 

ሌሎች ተውሳኮች እንዳያስፋፉ ምከራቸው፡፡
§ 51.57 Relevant factors. Among the factors the Attorney General will consider in making determinations with respect to the submitted changes affecting voting are the following: ( a ) The extent to which a reasonable and legitimate justification for the change exists;
( b ) The extent to which the jurisdiction followed objective guidelines and fair and conventional procedures in adopting the change;
( c ) The extent to which the jurisdiction afforded members of racial and language minority groups an opportunity to participate in the decision to make the change;
( d ) The extent to which the jurisdiction took the concerns of members of racial and language minority groups into account in making the change; and
( e ) The factors set forth in *Village of Arlington Heights* v. *Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.,* 429 U.S. 252 (1977): ( 1 ) Whether the impact of the official action bears more heavily on one race than another;
( 2 ) The historical background of the decision;
( 3 ) The specific sequence of events leading up to the decision;
( 4 ) Whether there are departures from the normal procedural sequence;
( 5 ) Whether there are substantive departures from the normal factors considered; and
( 6 ) The legislative or administrative history, including contemporaneous statements made by the decision makers.
[Order No. 3262-2011, 76 FR 21249, Apr. 15, 2011]
§ 551.71 Procedures. ( a ) The Warden may permit polygraph tests in connection with a State or Federal criminal felony investigation.
( b ) The Warden may permit polygraph tests in connection with misdemeanor offenses, civil proceedings, or any other matters. This type of request, however, is generally disapproved, absent a federal court order for the test.
( c ) The Warden may permit a polygraph test at the request of a defense counsel or other representative of the inmate. These requests are subject to the same standards and procedures applicable to testing by law enforcement officials.
( d ) The Warden may deny any request for testing which may disrupt the security or good order of the institution.
( e ) Upon written request to conduct a polygraph examination of an inmate, the Warden may approve the request if: ( 1 ) The validity of the request and of the examining agency can be confirmed;
( 2 ) The request complies with this section; and
( 3 ) The inmate gives written consent to the testing.
( f ) If the request is approved, the Warden shall notify the requestor that he is responsible for meeting all state and local requirements in administering the test.
( g ) The Bureau of Prisons maintains a record in the inmate's central file of the polygraph test indicating the inmate's consent and the time and place of and the personnel involved in the testing.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 53 (Friday, March 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14979-14980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6458]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Open Meeting Notice

    Notice is hereby given that the National Institutes of Health 
(NIH), Department of Health and Human Services, will hold a scientific 
workshop.

    Title: ``State of the Knowledge Workshop on Myalgic 
Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) Research''.
    Dates: April 7-8, 2011.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Place: Building 31, Conference Rooms 6C8/9/10, NIH campus, 
Bethesda, Maryland.
    Purpose of the Meeting: This workshop will bring together subject 
matter experts who will discuss multiple aspects of ME/CFS, including 
epidemiology, etiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. The 
workshop panelists will identify gaps in knowledge and opportunities 
for advancing biomedical research.
    This workshop is open to the public. Please note that attendance is 
limited. We encourage registration for those attending in person (see 
Web address below). For those unable to attend, the workshop will be 
available via NIH VideoCasting (http://videocast.nih.gov/) both during 
and after the event.
    Individuals with disabilities who need reasonable accommodation 
should indicate their needs on registration or contact Infinity 
Conference Group by telephone at 703-925-9455, ext. 0, or e-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0168626641686f67686f687578626e6f676473646f6264722f626e6c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e58c8682a58c8b838c8b8c919c868a8b838097808b868096cb868a88">[email protected]</span></a>.
    For more information including an agenda, registration, and visitor 
information, please visit the workshop Web site: https://www.infinityconferences.com/InfiniBase/Templates/157557/Index.htm.
    Contact Person: Dennis Mangan, PhD; Chair, Trans-NIH ME/CFS 
Research Working Group, Office of Research on

[[Page 14980]]

Women's Health, Division of Program Coordination, Planning, and 
Strategic Initiatives, Office of the Director, NIH; 301-496-9006; 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3276575c5c5b411c7f535c55535c725c5b5a1c555d44"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a8eccdc6c6c1db86e5c9c6cfc9c6e8c6c1c086cfc7de">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: March 14, 2011.
Francis S. Collins,
Director, National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 2011-6458 Filed 3-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Unassociated Document


Exhibit 10.33


 


ANTHERA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.


Deferred Compensation Election Form


 







 



	
I.

	
Elective Deferral Percentages







 


As specified below, I elect pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Agreement entered into by Anthera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) and me as of the 28th day of December, 2015  (the “Deferred Compensation Agreement”) to defer receipt of that percentage of my Eligible Compensation which would otherwise be paid to me for services during 2016 (with respect to compensation earned with respect to services to be performed by me subsequent to the date of this election) and subsequent calendar years:


 



	 	
Deferral Percentage:

	
Base Annual Salary:  60%







Annual Bonus: 100%


 


I understand that this election is irrevocable for 2016 and that unless and until this election is changed prospectively for future calendar years on a new election form before those years begin, this election shall continue as shown above for all subsequent calendar years.  Capitalized terms used in this election will have the meaning given such terms in the Deferred Compensation Agreement.


 



	
II.

	
Form and Timing of Payment of Account







 


I understand that my Account will be paid to me upon the first to occur of the dates specified in Section 3 of the Deferred Compensation Agreement and that I may specify a date for subsection (i) of such Section 3.  The date I specify for subsection (i) of Section 3 of the Deferred Compensation Agreement is January 1st, 2017.  I understand that if I do not specify a date, that the Account will be paid to me upon the first to occur of the dates/events specified in subsections (ii) through (v) of Section 3 of the Deferred Compensation Agreement.  At the End of the Deferral Period, my Account will be paid as specified in Section 4 of the Deferred Compensation Agreement, subject to the requirements of Section 8 of the Deferred Compensation Agreement.


 


I understand that any amounts deferred by this election and any other amounts deferred by me pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Agreement shall be credited to a bookkeeping account established for me by the Company and that any segregation of Company assets intended to satisfy the obligations of the Company under the Deferred Compensation Agreement shall not confer a beneficial ownership interest on me and any such assets shall remain subject to the claims of the general creditors of the Company in the event of the bankruptcy or insolvency of the Company.


 




  





  











  






 


Executed on the date specified below.


 


 



	
/s/ Paul F. Truex

	  	
December 28th, 2015


	
Executive: Paul F. Truex

	  	
Date


	
Title: President and CEO

	  	  







 


Receipt of Form by Company


 



	
Received by:

	
/s/ May Liu

	 











	
Title:

	
SVP, Finance & Administration

	 











	
Date signed:

	

December 28th, 2015

	 










 


 2
1 In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09 -21- 00306

- CR

__________________

RAYMUNDO BERMUDEZ , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court
Jefferson County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 14

- 18677

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Raymundo Bermudez appeal s his conviction for assaulting a public

servant , a third

- degree felony

. 1 After filing t he notice of appeal, the trial

court appointed an attorney to represent Bermudez in his appeal

. The

attorney discharged his re sponsibilit i es to Bermudez by filing and Anders

1 See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.0 1 (b)(1 ).2 brief

. 2 In the brief, Berm u dez’s attorney represents there are no arguable

reversible errors to be addressed in Bermudez’s appeal. 3 The brief the

attorney filed contains a professional evaluation of the record

. In the

brief, Bermudez’s attorney explains why, under the record in Bermudez’s

case, no arguable issues exist to reverse the trial court’s judgment. 4

Bermudez’s attorney also represented that he sent Bermudez a copy of

the brief and the record. When the brief was filed, the Clerk of the Ninth

Court of Appeals notified Bermudez , by letter, that he could file a pro se

brief or response with the Court on o r before March 21 , 202 2

. Bermudez,

however, failed to respond.

When an attorney files an Anders brief, we are required to

independently examine the record and determine whether the attorney

assigned to represent the defendant has a non

- frivolous argument that

would support the appeal

. 5 After reviewing the clerk ’ s record, the

reporter ’ s record, and the attorney ’ s brief, we agree there are no arguable

2 See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967).

3 See id .; High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

4 Id

. 5 Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988) (citing Anders , 386 U.S. at 744).3 grounds to support the appeal. Thus, it follows the appeal is frivolous. 6

For that reason, we need not require the trial court to appoint another

attorney to re

- brief the appeal. 7

The trial court’s judgmen t is affirmed.

AFFIRMED

.

_________________________ HOLLIS HORTON
Justice

Submitted on September 14, 2022 Opinion Delivered September 28, 2022
Do Not Publish

Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.

6 See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 827

- 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) ( “ Due to the nature of Anders briefs, by indicating in the opinion
that it considered the issues raised in the bri efs and reviewed the record for reversible error but found none, the court of appeals met the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 47.1. ” ).

7 See Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).
Bermudez may challenge our decision in the case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.
#### § 367.2110 Account 211, Miscellaneous paid-in capital.

This account must include the balance of all other credits for paid-in capital that is not properly included in proprietary capital accounts. This account may include all commissions and expenses incurred in connection with the issuance of capital stock.
§ 385.218 Simplified procedure for complaints involving small controversies (Rule 218). ( a ) *Eligibility.* The procedures under this section are available to complainants if the amount in controversy is less than $100,000 and the impact on other entities is *de minimis.*
( b ) *Contents.* A complaint filed under this section must contain: ( 1 ) The name of the complainant;
( 2 ) The name of the respondent;
( 3 ) A description of the relationship to the respondent;
( 4 ) The amount in controversy;
( 5 ) A statement why the complaint will have a *de minimis* impact on other entities;
( 6 ) The facts and circumstances surrounding the complaint, including the legal or regulatory obligation breached by the respondent; and
( 7 ) The requested relief.
( c ) *Service.* The complainant is required to simultaneously serve the complaint on the respondent and any other entity referenced in the complaint.
( d ) *Notice.* Public notice of the complaint will be issued by the Commission.
( e ) *Answers, interventions and comments.* ( 1 ) An answer to a complaint is required to conform to the requirements of § 385.213(c)(1), (2), and (3).
( 2 ) Answers, interventions and comments must be filed within 10 days after the complaint is filed. In cases where the complainant requests privileged treatment for information in its complaint, answers, interventions, and comments must be filed within 20 days after the complaint is filed. In the event there is an objection to the protective agreement, the Commission will establish when answers, interventions, and comments are due.
( f ) *Privileged treatment.* If a complainant seeks privileged treatment for any documents submitted with the complaint, a complainant must use the procedures described in section 385.206(e). If a respondent seeks privileged treatment for any documents submitted with the answer, a respondent must use the procedures described in section 385.213(c)(5).
[Order 602, 64 FR 17099, Apr. 8, 1999]
§ 17.14 Department Review Committee. ( a ) The Department Review Committee (DRC) is established to: ( 1 ) Resolve all issues, except those related to the compromise of classified information, that concern the implementation and administration of Executive Order 12958, implementing directives from the ISOO, and subpart B of this part, including those issues concerning over-classification, failure to declassify, classification challenges, and delays in declassification not otherwise resolved;
( 2 ) Review all appeals from denials of requests for records made under section 3.6 of Executive Order 12958 and the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552), when the proposed denial is based on their continued classification under Executive Order 12958;
( 3 ) Recommend to the Attorney General appropriate administrative sanctions to correct the abuse or violation of any provision of Executive Order 12958, the implementing directives or subpart B of this part, except as it relates to the compromise of classified national security information; and
( 4 ) Review, on appeal, challenges to classification actions and mandatory review requests.
( b ) ( 1 ) The DRC shall consist of a senior representative designated by the: ( i ) Deputy Attorney General;
( ii ) Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel;
( iii ) Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Division;
( iv ) Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division;
( v ) Assistant Attorney General for National Security;
( vi ) Assistant Attorney General for Administration; and
( vii ) Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation.
( 2 ) Each such official shall also designate in writing an alternate to serve in the absence of his or her representative. Four representatives shall constitute a quorum of the DRC. The Attorney General shall designate the Chairman of the DRC from among its members.
( c ) The Office of Information and Privacy (OIP) shall provide the necessary administrative staff support for the DRC.
[Order No. 2091-97, 62 FR 36984, July 10, 1997, as amended by Order No. 2865-2007, 72 FR 10069, Mar. 7, 2007]
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

05/29

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 29 May 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.48 N 77.37 W Meters AGL
EX-10.8



 EXHIBIT 10.8 

Non-Employee Director Compensation Summary Sheet 
  

					
	 Annual Retainer
	  	$	39,655	  

  

					
	 Type of Meeting
	  	Amount Paid per Meeting	 
	 Board Meeting
	  	$	3,965	  
	 Special Meeting
	  	$	3,965	  
	 Telephonic Board Meeting
	  	$	1,130	  
	 Compensation & Nominating Committee Meeting
	  	$	1,700	  
	 Audit Committee Meeting
	  	$	3,400	  
	 Executive Committee Meeting
	  	$	3,965	  
	 Additional Fee for Chairperson (except Audit)
	  	$	1,700	  
	 Additional Fee for Audit Committee Chairperson
	  	$	2,265
MEMOR ANDUM

Subject: Summary of Stakeholder Meeting including a Discussion on Ozone NAAQS

Proposal

From: Scott Jenkins

To: Docket EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2008

- 0699

Date: February 27, 2015

On February 27, 2015, staff members from the U.S. EPA, O ffice of Air Quality Planning and

Standards, met with industry representatives. The EPA staff fielded general questions pertaining

to the a gency’s November 25, 2015, proposed revisions to the National Am bient Air Quality

Standa rds for Ozone.

There were no meeting materials.

The attendees were as follows:

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Scott Jenkins

Kimber Scavo

Michael Ling

Carla Oldham

Heather Simon

Butch Stackhouse

Lynne Dail

Nicole Hagen

The industry representatives were:

Helene Hardy Pierce

– GAF

Gregory Johnson

– Sherwin

- Williams

John Ferraro

– Roof Coatings Manufacturers Association

Stacey

- Anne Taylor

– The Henry Company