alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from  the
unaudited financial statements for the period ended September 30, 2000 that were
filed  with the company's report on Form 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety
by  reference  to  such  financial  statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         1
<OTHER-SE>                                      (2)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     0
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0


</TABLE>
#### § 551.160 Purpose and scope.

To advance towards becoming a clean air environment and to protect the health and safety of staff and inmates, the Bureau of Prisons will restrict areas and circumstances where smoking is permitted within its institutions and offices.
#### § 35.178 State immunity.

A State shall not be immune under the eleventh amendment to the Constitution of the United States from an action in Federal or State court of competent jurisdiction for a violation of this Act. In any action against a State for a violation of the requirements of this Act, remedies (including remedies both at law and in equity) are available for such a violation to the same extent as such remedies are available for such a violation in an action against any public or private entity other than a State.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS RULINGS

Release No. 6899/March 15, 2023

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-21241

In the Matter of :

:

JASON JIANXUN TANG, CPA : ORDER

The Securities and Exchange Commission instituted this proceeding against Respondent Jason 

Jianxun Tang, CPA, with an Order Instituting Proceedings (OIP), pursuant to Sections 4C and 21C of 

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 102(e) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, 17 C.F.R. 

§ 201.102(e), on November 17, 2022. Pursuant to Respondent’s Offer of Settlement, the OIP made 

various findings of fact and conclusions of law, imposed remedial sanctions and a cease-and-desist 

order, and ordered a hearing before the undersigned Administrative Law Judge to determine what, if 

any, civil penalties are appropriate under Section 21C of the Exchange Act.

Under consideration is the parties’ March 13, 2023, Joint Proposal for Further Postponement of 

Proceedings.1 They request a two-month postponement of the proceedings before the undersigned, 

based on their pending request that the Commission stay the proceedings. Good cause has been shown 

for the requested postponement, which will be granted. 17 C.F.R. § 201.161(a). The parties will file a 

proposal addressing the way forward by May 12, 2023, if the Commission has not yet ruled on the stay 

request by that date.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

/S/ Carol Fox Foelak 

Carol Fox Foelak

Administrative Law Judge

 

1

See Jason Jianxun Tang, CPA, Admin. Proc. Release No. 6895, 2023 SEC LEXIS 63 (A.L.J. Jan. 13, 

2023) (granting a two month postponement based on the parties’ request that the Commission stay the 

proceeding and ordering them to file a proposal addressing the way forward by March 13, 2023, if the 

Commission had not yet ruled on the stay request).
C ite as 2 016 Ark. App. 538

1 

## ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION IV No . CV-16- 97

RALPH BRADBURY APPELLANT
V. EDWARD HARVEY; BONNIE HARVEY; and MARVIN JONES APPELLEE S Opinion Delivered November 9 , 2016
APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT , SIXTH DIVISION [NO

. 60CV

- 2011

- 5472]
HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER CHARLES PIAZZA , JUDGE
APPEAL DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE ; MOTION TO DISMISS MOOT BRANDON J. HARRISON , Judge Ralph Bradbury appeals two Pulaski County Circuit Court summary
- judgment
orders. We must dismiss this appeal without prejudice because there is no final order in the
circuit court. Whether an order is final and therefore appealable is a jurisdictional question that this
court will raise on its own. Kowalski v. Rose Drugs of Dardanelle , Inc ., 2009 Ark. 524, 357 S.W.3d 432. The orders that Bradbury has appealed are not final because the y do not resolve Edward Harvey’s and Bonnie Harvey’s counterclaim against Bradbury for an alleged breach of fiduciary duty. See City of Corning v. Cochran , 350 Ark. 12, 14, 84 S.W.3d 439, 441 (2002) (pending counterclaim destroys finality)

.C ite as 2 016 Ark. App. 538

2 W e take this oppo rtunity to remind Bradbury that , should he appeal again , his
addendum must include all papers that are essential to confirm our jurisdiction

. Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4- 2(a)(8)(A) (2015). A final point. T he Harveys moved to dismiss Bradbury’s appeal because “the claims against the John Doe defendants are not adjudicated and continue to exist” and that an order dismissing two defendants from the case was entered after Bradbury had filed his notice of appeal. Based on our finality decision, the motion is moot. Appeal dismissed without prejudice ; motion to dismiss moot.
V IRDEN and B ROWN , JJ., agree. Jack Nelson Jones, P.A. , by: Randy Coleman , for appellant.
Barber Law Firm PLLC , by: Robert L. Henry III , for appellees Edward Harvey and Bonnie Harvey. Watts, Donovan & Tilley, P.A. , by: David M. Donovan , for appellee Marvin Jones.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

In re: ) 

 ) 

GEORGE ECONOMOU ) Case No. 15-72851 

 ) Chapter 7 

 ) 

 Debtor ) 

REPORT OF DEBTOR AUDIT 

 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 586(f)(1), the United States Trustee contracted for an audit to be 

performed of the above-captioned debtor’s petition, schedules and other information filed by the 

debtor in this case. In accordance with the Debtor Audit Standards established pursuant to 

Section 603(a) of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005, 

Chiampou Travis Besaw & Kershner LLP performed the procedures enumerated in the contract 

between it and the United States Trustee Program to determine whether certain items in the 

bankruptcy petition, schedules, and statements as originally filed by George Economou in 

Bankruptcy Case No. 15-72851 contain material misstatements concerning the debtor’s income, 

expenditures, or assets. 

The auditor finds:

No material misstatements. ✓

One or more material misstatements. 

The material misstatements are listed on 

the attached List of Material 

Misstatements. 

 

 

 The debtor was responsible for the preparation of the bankruptcy petition, schedules, and 

statements in this case. The United States Trustee Program is responsible for the sufficiency of 

the procedures developed to determine the accuracy, veracity, and completeness of the petitions, 

schedules and other information that the debtor is required to provide under 11 U.S.C. §§ 521 

and 1322. Chiampou Travis Besaw & Kershner LLP makes no representation regarding the 

sufficiency of the procedures either for the purpose for which this report has been requested or 

for any other purpose. 

 The analysis and findings contained in this report are intended solely for the information 

and use of the United States Trustee Program and parties-in-interest in the subject civil 

bankruptcy proceeding and are not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than 

these parties. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited. 

The report is not a legal determination, and the legal effect of the auditor’s findings of material 

misstatement is a question for the Court.

Case 15-72851-FJS Doc 13 Filed 11/25/15 Entered 11/25/15 08:32:28 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Further, the findings contained in the report neither require the United States Trustee Program or 

other parties in interest to take, nor preclude these parties from taking, legal action in or relating 

to this case, including with respect to matters not discussed in this report. 

Dated this 25th day of November, 2015. 

 

 Respectfully Submitted, 

 

 /s/ Chiampou Travis Besaw & Kershner LLP

Case 15-72851-FJS Doc 13 Filed 11/25/15 Entered 11/25/15 08:32:28 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of the Application of Edward J. Flynn for Admission to the Bar.

Application granted. Present—Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Putnam, JJ.
§ 511.12 Prohibited objects. ( a ) “Prohibited objects,” as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1791(d)(1), include any objects that could jeopardize the Bureau's ability to ensure the safety, security, and orderly operation of Bureau facilities, and protect the public.
( b ) Examples of “prohibited objects” include, but are not limited to, the following items and their related paraphernalia: Weapons; explosives; drugs; intoxicants; currency; cameras of any type; recording equipment; telephones; radios; pagers; electronic devices; and any other objects that violate criminal laws or are prohibited by Federal regulations or Bureau policies.
| Delaware                                                          |   | 000-23143               |   | 13-3379479                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
| (State or other jurisdictionof incorporation)                     |   | (CommissionFile Number) |   | (IRS EmployerIdentification No.) |
|                                                              |   |                    |   |                             |
| 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, New York                  |   | 10591                   |
| (Address of principal executive offices)                          |   | (Zip Code)              |
| Registrant's telephone number, including area code (914) 789-2800 |

----

| Item 8.01. | Other Events. |
|------------|---------------|
| Item 9.01. | Financial Statements and Exhibits. |
|------------|------------------------------------|
| Exhibit No. | Description |
|-------------|-------------|
| 99.1   | Press Release dated April 8, 2015. |
|------------------|-----------------------------------------|

----

|   | PROGENICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. |
|--------|---------------------------------|
|   | By:                             | /s/ ANGELO W. LOVALLO, JR. |
|   |                            | Angelo W. Lovallo, Jr. |
|   |                            | Vice President - Finance & Treasurer |
|   |                            | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
§ 104.47 Collateral sources. ( a ) *Payments that constitute collateral source compensation.* The amount of compensation shall be reduced by all collateral source compensation the claimant has received or is entitled to receive as a result of the terrorist-related aircraft crashes of September 11, 2001, or debris removal in the immediate aftermath, including life insurance, pension funds, death benefits programs, payments by Federal, State, or local governments related to the terrorist- related aircraft crashes of September 11, 2001, or debris removal and payments made pursuant to the settlement of a civil action as described in section 405(c)(3)(C)(iii) of the Act. In determining the appropriate collateral source offset for future benefit payments, the Special Master may employ an appropriate methodology for determining the present value of such future benefits. In determining the appropriate value of offsets for pension funds, life insurance and similar collateral sources, the Special Master may, as appropriate, reduce the amount of offsets to take account of self- contributions made or premiums paid by the victim during his or her lifetime. In determining the appropriate collateral source offset for future benefit payments that are contingent upon one or more future event(s), the Special Master may reduce such offsets to account for the possibility that the future contingencies may or may not occur. In cases where the recipients of collateral source compensation are not beneficiaries of the awards from the Fund, the Special Master shall have discretion to exclude such compensation from the collateral source offset where necessary to prevent beneficiaries from having their awards reduced by collateral source compensation that they will not receive.
( b ) *Payments that do not constitute collateral source compensation.* The following payments received by claimants do not constitute collateral source compensation: ( 1 ) The value of services or in-kind charitable gifts such as provision of emergency housing, food, or clothing; and
( 2 ) Charitable donations distributed to the beneficiaries of the decedent, to the injured claimant, or to the beneficiaries of the injured claimant by privately funded charitable entities; provided however, that the Special Master may determine that funds provided to victims or their families through a privately funded charitable entity constitute, in substance, a payment described in paragraph (a) of this section.
( 3 ) Tax benefits received from the Federal government as a result of the enactment of the Victims of Terrorism Tax Relief Act.
Attachment G - Worksheets uses to calculate registrant & EPA wage rates

2015

AGENCY HOURS, RATES * TOTAL

Collection Activities Mgmt, $/hr Technical, 

$/hr

Clerical, $/hr Hours Costs

$124.09 $81.53 $46.42 

If necessary, assign 

an EPA company 

number to the 

supplemental 

distributor.

- - 0.08 0.08 $3.71 $1.24 only 1/3, see 

footnote

Verify, acknowledge 

receipt1 

- - 0.03 0.03 $1.39

• Initial product 

screening2

- 0.36 - 0.36 $29.35 $141.77 

• Product review 

meeting2

0.63 - - 0.63 $78.18

• Process 

disapproved product 

distribution 

information2

- 0.42 - 0.42 $34.24 $14.18 10% reviewed, 

see footnote

Process: Enter form 

information into 

electronic file in 

OPPIN

- 0.5 - 0.5 $40.77

File and maintain 

information

- 0.02 - 0.02 $1.63

Total 0.63 1.3 0.11 2.04 $59.20

* U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2014) ; NAICS 999100 – Federal Executive Branch (OES Designation). Available from BLS Web site at 

http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4_999100.htm 1 Approximately 90% of forms received by EPA are completed correctly and undergo standard processing, requiring only clerical and technical labor types. 

2 The rest of the forms (approximately 10%) require review by the Agency's product review team, requiring all three types of labor.

3 The rest of the forms (approximately 10%) require review by the Agency's product review team, requiring all three types of labor. In the calculations the maximum time was 

used, but the expected cost $14.18 [10% * $141.77 (29.35+78.18+34.24)] was used for total. 

2.04 TRUE
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

79) ll-K- (B) -67 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:50 AM Sheet 79 of 325 
P.2 

J-Vn 1 S3 fx/ V» 

II-K-(B)-67 

ESP CONTROL COST ALGORITHMS FOR RESIDUAL OIL-FIRED 

BOILERS. 

Letter from K. Held, EEA to J. Pratapas, EPA:SASD. 

September 7, 1979. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(B)-67 

7
#### § 513.65 Review of documents for Freedom of Information Act requests.

If a document is deemed to contain information exempt from disclosure, any reasonably segregable portion of the record shall be provided to the requester after deletion of the exempt portions. If documents, or portions of documents, in an Inmate Central File have been determined to be nondisclosable by institution staff but are later released by Regional or Central Office staff pursuant to a request under this section, appropriate instructions will be given to the institution to move those documents, or portions, from the Inmate Privacy Folder into the disclosable section of the Inmate Central File.
### §1157. North Pacific Fur Seal Commission; appointment of United States Commissioner, Deputy Commissioner, and Advisors; duties, compensation, and travel expenses

The President shall appoint to the Commission a United States Commissioner who shall serve at the pleasure of the President. The President may appoint one Native from each of the two inhabited Pribilof Islands to serve as Advisors to the Commissioner and as liaisons between the Commissioner and the Natives of the Pribilof Islands. The President may also appoint other interested parties as Advisors to the Commissioner. Such Advisors shall serve at the pleasure of the President. The President may also appoint a Deputy United States Commissioner who shall serve at the pleasure of the President. The Deputy Commissioner shall be the principal adviser of the Commissioner, and shall perform the duties of the Commissioner in the case of his death, resignation, absence, or illness. The Commissioner, the Deputy Commissioner, and the Advisors shall receive no compensation for their services. The Commissioners may be paid traval 1 expenses and per diem in lieu of subsistence at the rates authorized by section 5703 of title 5 when engaged in the performance of their duties.

(Pub. L. 89–702, title I, §107, Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1093; Pub. L. 98–129, §2, Oct. 14, 1983, 97 Stat. 838.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

"Section 5703 of title 5" substituted in text for "section 5 of the Administrative Expense Act of 1946" on authority of Pub. L. 89–554, §7(b), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 631, the first section of which enacted Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Amendments

1983—Pub. L. 98–129 amended section generally, substituting provisions establishing the North Pacific Fur Seal Commission, which were previously contained in section 1156 of this title, for provisions empowering the Secretaries of State and Commerce to accept or reject recommendations made by the Commission. See section 1158 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Alternate United States Commissioners

Secretary of State authorized to designate Alternate United States Commissioners, see sections 2672a and 2672b of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse.

1 So in original. Probably should be "travel".
§ 2.62 Rewarding assistance in the prosecution of other offenders; criteria and guidelines. ( a ) The Commission may consider as a factor in the parole release decision-making a prisoner's assistance to law enforcement authorities in the prosecution of other offenders. ( 1 ) The assistance must have been an important factor in the investigation and/or prosecution of an offender other than the prisoner. Other significant assistance (e.g., providing information critical to prison security) may also be considered.
( 2 ) The assistance must be reported to the Commission in sufficient detail to permit a full evaluation. However, no promises, express or implied, as to a Parole Commission reward shall be given any weight in evaluating a recommendation for leniency.
( 3 ) The release of the prisoner must not threaten the public safety.
( 4 ) The assistance must not have been adequately rewarded by other official action.
( b ) If the assistance meets the above criteria, the Commission may consider providing a reduction of up to one year from the presumptive parole date that the Commission would have deemed warranted had such assistance not occurred. If the prisoner would have been continued to the expiration of sentence, any reduction will be taken from the actual date of the expiration of the sentence. Reductions exceeding the one year limit specified above may be considered only in exceptional circumstances.
( c ) In the case of an eligible DC Code prisoner whose assistance meets the criteria of this section, the Commission may consider deducting a point under Category V of the Point Assignment Table at § 2.80, in addition to any other deduction for positive program achievement, when considering such prisoner for parole. In the case of a DC Code prisoner with an unserved minimum term, the Commission may consider filing an application under § 2.76 for a reduction of up to one-third of such term less applicable good time.
[52 FR 44389, Nov. 19, 1987. Redesignated at 63 FR 39176, July 21, 1998, as amended at 64 FR 5613, Feb. 4, 1999]
September 1, 2016

Ms. Lisa Ellman Hogan Lovells US LLP Counsel for Lift Technologies LLC dba Lift Tech 555 13th Street, NW. Washington, DC 20004

Dear Ms. Ellman:

Re: FAA-2015-4641

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and
have determined that we will con tinue to process your petition.

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov , we are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently-issued regulation, Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 107 ( www.faa.gov/uas ) will satisfy your request. We have determined that your request requires further regulatory relief (T ier 3), and we will continue working on your petition for exemption.

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will publish a summary of your petition in the Federa l Register for public comments, if we have not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final deci sion on your petition as s oon as possible. If you have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov

.

Sincerely,
/s/
Brenda Robeson Program Analyst