alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 71.23 Subpoenas for attendance at hearing. ( a ) A party wishing to procure the appearance and testimony of any individual at the hearing may request that the ALJ issue a subpoena.
( b ) A subpoena requiring the attendance and testimony of an individual may also require the individual to produce documents at the hearing.
( c ) A party seeking a subpoena shall file a written request therefor not less than 15 days before the date fixed for the hearing unless otherwise allowed by the ALJ upon a showing of good cause. Such request shall specify any documents to be produced and shall designate the witnesses and describe the address and location thereof with sufficient particularity to permit such witnesses to be found.
( d ) The subpoena shall specify the time and place at which the witness is to appear and any documents the witness is to produce.
( e ) The party seeking the subpoena shall serve it in the manner prescribed in § 71.8. A subpoena on a party or upon an individual under the control of a party may be served by first class mail.
( f ) A party or the individual to whom the subpoena is directed may file with the ALJ a motion to quash the subpoena within ten days after service or on or before the time specified in the subpoena for compliance if it is less than ten days after service.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 753 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 753

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to count a period of 
    receipt of outpatient observation services in a hospital toward 
  satisfying the 3-day inpatient hospital requirement for coverage of 
           skilled nursing facility services under Medicare.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 12, 2019

 Mr. Brown (for himself, Mr. Whitehouse, Mrs. Capito, Ms. Collins, Mr. 
King, Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. Reed, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Coons, Ms. 
 Hassan, Ms. Harris, Mr. Peters, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Cardin, Ms. Smith, 
  Mr. Markey, Ms. Stabenow, and Ms. Warren) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to count a period of 
    receipt of outpatient observation services in a hospital toward 
  satisfying the 3-day inpatient hospital requirement for coverage of 
           skilled nursing facility services under Medicare.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Improving Access to Medicare 
Coverage Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. COUNTING A PERIOD OF RECEIPT OF OUTPATIENT OBSERVATION SERVICES 
              IN A HOSPITAL TOWARD THE 3-DAY INPATIENT HOSPITAL 
              REQUIREMENT FOR COVERAGE OF SKILLED NURSING FACILITY 
              SERVICES UNDER MEDICARE.

    (a) In General.--Section 1861(i) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395x(i)) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``For 
purposes of this subsection, an individual receiving outpatient 
observation services shall be deemed to be an inpatient during such 
period, and the date such individual ceases receiving such services 
shall be deemed the hospital discharge date (unless such individual is 
admitted as a hospital inpatient at the end of such period).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to receipt of outpatient observation services beginning on or 
after January 1, 2019, but applies to a period of post-hospital 
extended care services that was completed before the date of the 
enactment of this Act only if an administrative appeal is or has been 
made with respect to such services not later than 90 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act. Notwithstanding any other provision 
of law, the Secretary of Health and Human Services may implement such 
amendment through an interim final regulation, program instruction, or 
otherwise.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32.01

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Grey Global Group Inc. (the
"Company") for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Edward H.
Meyer, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Steven G. Felsher, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Edward H. Meyer
-----------------------
Edward H. Meyer
Chief Executive Officer
March 15, 2004

/s/ Steven G. Felsher
-----------------------
Steven G. Felsher
Chief Financial Officer
March 15, 2004

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7913

ERNEST L. REARDON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STANLEY BURTT, Warden; HENRY MCMASTER, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (CA-04-1566) Submitted: April 28, 2005 Decided: May 4, 2005 Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ernest L. Reardon, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Alan Jacobs, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Ernest L. Reardon, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting a magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Reardon has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
§ 2.45 Same; youth offenders. ( a ) In addition to the issuance of a summons or warrant pursuant to § 2.44 of this part, the Commission or a member thereof, when of the opinion that a youth offender will be benefited by further treatment in an institution or other facility, may direct his return to custody or issue a warrant for his apprehension and return to custody.
( b ) Upon his return to custody, such youth offender shall be scheduled for a revocation hearing.
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-13-0184 SAT Date: 1/4/2013 Print Date: 2/4/2013

Related cases : Health related cases:

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 2 3

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 2 1 Linear 2 3 1 Branched

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: Yes
Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: IRR/CORR-S,E,L,MM; AQUATOX Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-13-0180-5 FATE: Estimations for
Liquid with MP < 25 C (E) log Kow = 5.97 (E); S = Dispersible /0.3 mg/L at 25 C (E) VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E)log Koc = 5.04 (E) log Fish BCF = 2.2 (E) log Fish BAF = 2.7 (E) POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption and biodeg Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = Linear wk; Highly branched ≥ mo Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong PBT Potential: Linear P1B2; Highly branched P2B3 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

Health : Health Summary: Absorption is poor from the skin, moderate from the GI tract, and good from the lung (analog). Concern for severe irritation and possible corrosion from the amines.

Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 6.7 daphnid 48-h LC50 0.97 green algal 96-h EC50 0.38 fish

_ chronic value 0.038 daphnid

_ chronic value 0.096
algal

_ chronic value 0.21
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for Aliphatic Amines, Amides; SAR class = Amides; log Kow = 3.7; S = 0.03 g/L at 20 C, dispersible; p H7; liquid with unknown mp (P); effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 4

SARs Aliphatic Amines, Amides SAR Class Amides Ecotox Category Aliphatic Amines
Ecotox Factors Comments:SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

 Richmond Division

In re: 

 

Demetrice Antonio Jones 

Cheryl Dionne Jones Case No. 15-35268-KLP

 

Debtors Chapter 13

21500 Court St. 

S. Chesterfield, VA 23803 AP No. 15-03459

 

Last four digits of Social Security or Individual Tax-payer 

Identification (ITIN) No(s)., (if any): 8179, 2467

v.

Old Towne Motors, Inc. 

Defendants 

WITHDRAWAL OF PLEADING

NOW COMES the Debtor(s), by counsel, and hereby withdraws their pleading 

entitled Motion for Expedited Hearing on Debtor’s Motion to Shorten Time for 

Responses to Debtor’s Notice of Debtor’s Motion to Recover Property of the Bankruptcy 

Estate filed on 11/3/2015 as document number 4 on the following grounds:

1. The Defendant satisfied the complaint. 

Respectfully submitted,

Demetrice Antonio Jones

 Cheryl Dionne Jones 

BY: /s/ Brian K. Stevens 

 Counsel

Brian K. Stevens, VSB#25974

America Law Group, Inc. 

2312 Boulevard 

Colonial Heights, VA 23834

(804) 520-2428

Case 15-03459-KLP Doc 10 Filed 11/09/15 Entered 11/09/15 15:33:21 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Certificate of Service

I certify that on the November 9, 2015, I mailed a true copy of the foregoing 

Withdrawal by either first class mail, postage prepaid, electronically or by fax William 

David Mueller, Registered Agent, Old Towne Motors, Inc., 544 East Washington Street, 

Petersburg, VA 23803.

/s/ Brian K. Stevens

Brian K. Stevens, Esquire

Case 15-03459-KLP Doc 10 Filed 11/09/15 Entered 11/09/15 15:33:21 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
#### § 44.201 [Reserved]
Exhibit 21





                Hannaford Bros. Co. Parents and Subsidiaries

                                   Percentage
                                    of Voting
                                                 State          Securities
                                                   of           Owned by the
     Registrant                              Incorporation       Registrant 

Hannaford Bros. Co.                               Maine

     Subsidiaries (1)

Athenian Real Estate Development, Inc.          Virginia          100.00%
Boney Wilson & Sons, Inc.                    North Carolina       100.00%
Hannaford Licensing Corp.                         Maine           100.00%
Hannaford Procurement Corp.                       Maine           100.00%
Hannaford Trucking Company                        Maine           100.00%
HHR, Inc.                                    Massachusetts        100.00%
Martin's Foods of South Burlington, Inc.         Vermont          100.00%
Plain Street Properties, Inc.                     Maine           100.00%
Progressive Distributors, Inc.                    Maine           100.00%
Shop 'n Save-Mass., Inc.                     Massachusetts        100.00%


     (1) Each of the  subsidiaries  is  included in the  consolidated  financial
statements of the Registrant.
| 1. | Allianz Life Variable Account B is a unit investment trust as that term is defined in Section 4(2) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the Act), and  is currently registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 8(a) of the Act. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Upon the acceptance of purchase payments made by a Contract Owner pursuant to a Contract issued in accordance with the Prospectus contained in the Registration Statement and upon compliance with applicable law, such a Contract Owner will have a legally-issued, fully-paid, non-assessable contractual interest under such Contract. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
NO. 12-08-00466-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

JERAMY WAYNE HASTINGS, § APPEAL FROM THE 114TH

APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant was convicted of driving

while intoxicated with a child passenger, a state jail felony, and placed on community supervision

for three years. His community supervision was revoked on October 5, 2008, and he attempts to

appeal the revocation.

In a criminal case, an appeal is perfected when notice of appeal is filed within thirty days

after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court unless a motion for new trial is timely

filed. TEX.R.APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). Appellant did not file a motion for new trial. Therefore, his notice

of appeal was due to have been filed on or before November 5, 2008. However, Appellant did not

file his notice of appeal until November 21, 2008, and therefore the notice was untimely.

Along with his notice of appeal, Appellant filed a motion requesting an extension of time for

filing his notice of appeal. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3 provides that a motion for

extension of time to file a notice of appeal must be filed within fifteen days of the deadline for filing

the notice of appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Accordingly, Appellant was required to file his motion

on or before November 20, 2008. However, the motion was not filed until November 21, 2008, and

therefore was untimely. See id.
2

Because this court has no authority to allow the late filing of a notice of appeal except as

provided by Rule 26.3, the appeal must be dismissed. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210

(Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Accordingly,

Appellant’s motion is overruled, and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 

Opinion delivered December 3, 2008.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
§ 68.37 Waiver of right to appear and failure to participate or to appear. ( a ) *Waiver of right to appear.* If all parties waive in writing their right to appear before the Administrative Law Judge or to present evidence or argument personally or by representative, it shall not be necessary to give notice of and conduct an oral hearing. A waiver of the right to appear and present evidence and allegations as to facts and law shall be made in writing and filed with the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer or the Administrative Law Judge. Where such a waiver has been filed by all parties and they do not appear before the Administrative Law Judge personally or by representative, the Administrative Law Judge shall make a record of the relevant written evidence submitted by the parties, together with any pleadings they may submit with respect to the issues in the case. Such documents shall be considered as all of the evidence in the case and decision shall be based on them.
( b ) *Dismissal—Abandonment by party.* A complaint or a request for hearing may be dismissed upon its abandonment by the party or parties who filed it. A party shall be deemed to have abandoned a complaint or a request for hearing if: ( 1 ) A party or his or her representative fails to respond to orders issued by the Administrative Law Judge; or
( 2 ) Neither the party nor his or her representative appears at the time and place fixed for the hearing and either ( i ) Prior to the time for hearing, such party does not show good cause as to why neither he or she nor his or her representative can appear; or
( ii ) Within ten (10) days after the time for hearing or within such other period as the Administrative Law Judge may allow, such party does not show good cause for such failure to appear.
( c ) *Default—Failure to appear.* A default decision, under § 68.9(b), may be entered, with prejudice, against any party failing, without good cause, to appear at a hearing.
[54 FR 48596, Nov. 24, 1989. Redesignated and amended by Order No. 1534-91, 56 FR 50053, 50056, Oct. 3, 1991; Order No. 1635-92, 57 FR 57672, Dec. 7, 1992]
# C_2011211EN.01001602.xml

| 16.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/16 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | -------- |

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) (Royaume-Uni) (United Kingdom) made on 13 May 2011 — Her Majesty's Commissioners of Revenue and Customs v Able UK Ltd

(Case C-225/11)

2011/C 211/31

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) (Royaume-Uni)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Her Majesty's Commissioners of Revenue and Customs

Defendant: Able UK Ltd

Question referred

| 1. | Is Article 151(1)(c) of the Principal VAT Directive( 1 ) to be interpreted as exempting a supply in the UK of services of dismantling obsolete US Navy ships for the US Department of Transportation Maritime Administration in either or both of the following circumstances:
(a)
where that supply was not made to a part of the armed forces of a NATO member taking part in the common defence effort or to civilian staff accompanying them; (b)
where that supply was not made to a part of the armed forces of a NATO member stationed in or visiting the United Kingdom or to civilian staff accompanying such forces? | (a) | where that supply was not made to a part of the armed forces of a NATO member taking part in the common defence effort or to civilian staff accompanying them; | (b) | where that supply was not made to a part of the armed forces of a NATO member stationed in or visiting the United Kingdom or to civilian staff accompanying such forces? |
| --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| (a) | where that supply was not made to a part of the armed forces of a NATO member taking part in the common defence effort or to civilian staff accompanying them; | | | | |
| (b) | where that supply was not made to a part of the armed forces of a NATO member stationed in or visiting the United Kingdom or to civilian staff accompanying such forces? | | | | |

---

( 1 )  Council Directive 2006/112/EC. OJ L 347, p. 1

---
Personal Use Mushroom Harvest Areas
Okanogan-Wenatchee NF North Half

This map is intended for general reference only. This is not a navigational map.

for the greatest good

aa
_| LEGEND
" @ = Major Towns
| ——= Highway
Major Road
County Roads
7 y

——-— Select Forest Service Roads
Mushroom Harvest Areas
|| Commercial And Personal Use

|| Personal Use Only
USDA FOREST SERVICE

Bureau of Land Management
Bureau of Indian Affairs
National Park Service

Other Federal Land

State Land
Other Land, Including Private

| Miles
| |o 17535

information
| may vary due to compilation ftom various sources, incuding modeling
‘06 tion, and may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards,

Lo aa,

‘Ta prosutis erento information prepared by
the USDA vice of from other suppliers. The Forest
Senice camer ssi the relat of sultant otis

' parlcular purpose. The data and product accuracy

‘hs nvormaton may be updated. corected oroterwise modifed
‘wthot ntfeaon. For more infomation contact.

‘Okanogan: Wenalchee SupensorsOffce at 509-884-8200.

eUSOAS oy eal orn werent evr

Nene Fat Sav Jor any of ls employees, makes any waranty
expressed or pl moyen ne
or assumes any legal labily
rte secllae, comlelane sa feat
= or Poags dstiose

ie



Personal Use Mushroom Harvest Areas
Okanogan-Wenatchee NF South Half

This map is intended for general reference only. This is not a navigational map.

€

p}

DS

\o pod ae
Osea 7
Ga yi ~.

VFS \

er Ee Py
LEGEND
@ = Major Towns

=== Highway

Major Road

— County Roads

——-— Select Forest Service Roads
Mushroom Harvest Areas
|| Commercial And Personal Use
|| Personal Use Only

USDA FOREST SERVICE
Bureau of Land Management
Bureau of Indian Affairs
National Park Service

Other Federal Land

State Land

Other Land, Including Private

Miles

(35)
S

& N
‘This product is reproduced fromaetirmation prepared by t_
corer rea Be ne fe
er ee an
Siew epee Fn
‘may vary due to compilation cn 1s sources, including modeling
emery ienteea
Tee Slee eta
ieee te tenet

Okanogan-Wenatthee Supervisors Office at 509.664.9200,

‘The USDA's an equi opportunity provider and employer.

Neither the Forest Servite, nor any of ts employees, makes any warranty
expressed or implied, including the warrantes of merchantabilty and
fitness fora particular pbrpose, or assumes any legal iabilty or
responsibilty forthe acduracy, completeness, or usefuiness of any
information, apparatus, product or process disclosed, or represents that
its use would not infringe privately ovmned rights.