alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 51 (Wednesday, March 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14425-14426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6047]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

[2280-665]


National Register of Historic Places; Notification of Pending 
Nominations and Related Actions

    Nominations for the following properties being considered for 
listing or related actions in the National Register were received by 
the National Park Service before February 11, 2011. Pursuant to 
sections 60.13 or 60.15 of 36 CFR part 60, written comments are being 
accepted concerning the significance of the nominated properties under 
the National Register criteria for evaluation. Comments may be 
forwarded by United States Postal Service, to the National Register of 
Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C St. NW., MS 2280, 
Washington, DC 20240; by all other carriers, National Register of 
Historic Places, National Park Service, 1201 Eye St., NW., 8th floor, 
Washington, DC 20005; or by fax, 202-371-6447. Written or faxed 
comments should be submitted by March 31, 2011.
    Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or 
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be 
aware that your entire comment--including your

[[Page 14426]]

personal identifying information--may be made publicly available at any 
time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal 
identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we 
will be able to do so.

Paul Loether,
Chief, National Register of Historic Places/National Historic Landmarks 
Program.

CALIFORNIA

San Francisco County

Waybur, Julian, House, 3232 Pacific Ave, San Francisco, 11000143

Santa Clara County

Seven Springs Ranch, 11801 Dorothy Anne Way, Cupertino, 11000146

FLORIDA

Orange County

Church of the Good Shepherd, 331 Lake Ave, Maitland, 11000144

St. Johns County

Nelmar Terrace Historic District, Alfred St, San Carlos Ave, San 
Marcos Ave, Hospital Creek, St. Augustine, 11000145

KENTUCKY

Jessamine County

Crockett, Joseph, House Union Mills Pike, Nicholasville, 83004587

MASSACHUSETTS

Essex County

East Parish Meeting House, 267 Middle Rd, Haverhill, 11000149

NEBRASKA

Cheyenne County

Woodsshire Residential Historic District, Bounded by High and 
Calvert Sts, South 17th to South 20th Sts, Lincoln, 11000147

Douglas County

Farm Credit Building, 206 S 19th St, >Omaha, 11000148

NORTH CAROLINA

Guilford County

Mock, Judson, Voehringer Company Hosiery Mill, 2610 Oakland Ave, 
Greensboro, 11000141

NORTH DAKOTA

McHenry County

Lower Souris National Wildlife Refuge Airplane Hangar, 681 Salyer 
Rd, Upham, 11000140

TENNESSEE

Sullivan County

    East Hill Cemetery, East State Street at Georgia Ave, Bristol, 
11000142

OTHER ACTIONS: Request for REMOVAL has been made for the following 
resource:

NORTH DAKOTA

Stutsman

Cecil Baker Round Barn, ND 38, Kensal, 86002759

[FR Doc. 2011-6047 Filed 3-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-51-P
## NUMBER 13

- 2 1

- 00 139

- CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ LAJAMES BRYANT , A ppellant ,

v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________ On a ppeal from the 130 th District Court of Matagorda County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________ 

## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justic es Longoria , Hinojosa, and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria

Upon review of the documents before the Court, it appears there is no final

appealable order. On May 5, 2021

, the clerk of the court notified appellant of this defect

and provided t en days to c orrect. Additionally, the record reflects appellant waived his2 right to appeal the final judgment in this matter. Appellant has neither corrected the defect

nor responded to the court’s notice

. The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed

if the trial court ’ s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d); see T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Furthermore, the record

does not reflect any other final and appealable o rder

, and appellant has failed to cure

such defect. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby dismissed.

NORA L. LONGORIA Justice

Do not publish. T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed on the 22nd day of July, 2021.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          54,232
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,371
<ALLOWANCES>                                       100
<INVENTORY>                                     10,479
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,299
<PP&E>                                           7,252
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,250
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  81,381
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,740
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        78,138
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,497)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    81,381
<SALES>                                         41,220
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,220
<CGS>                                           21,383
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,383
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,357
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,838
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,318
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,664
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,654
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,654
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .71
        

</TABLE>
Organizational Chart

Allianz  Aktiengesellschaft  Holding  (abbreviated  as Allianz AG  Holding),  of
Munich, Germany, is the controlling owner of Allianz of America, Inc.

Allianz of America,  Inc.  is sole owner of Allianz  Life  Insurance  Company of
North America.

Allianz Life is controlling owner of USAllianz Investor Services, LLC.
TS-ASLT40/50

Attachment #2

Summary of Information on the New Chemical SubstancesTS-ASLT40/50 Attachment #2

Manufacturing and Processing Information on the

New Chemical Substances – General Description
We note that fede ral subjec t matter jurisdiction is premised on the par ties’ diversity

of 1 citizenship. 28 U.S .C. § 1332. Although d ef endants have not conc eded that the amount-incontrove rsy

require ment is met, neither have they challeng ed the g ood-fa ith basis for plaintiff’s alleg ation that it is.

NO T REC OM M EN DE D F OR F UL L- TEX T P UB LIC AT ION F ile Nam e: 10a0082n.06 No. 09-1065 UN ITED STA TES C OU RT OF AP P EA LS F OR THE SI XT H C IR CU IT
M ARK LED ER TOU G , a n indi vid ual , P laintif f-App ellant,
v. BOULE VARD & TRUMBULL TOWING, INC., a Delaware cor por a ti o n ; and OFF ICIAL TOWING, INC., a D elaware cor poration, De fend ant s- App e lle e s. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON AP P EA L FR OM THE UNITED STAT ES DIS TRICT COU R T F OR

TH E EAST ERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

BEF ORE: M AR TIN , R OG ER S and M c KEA G UE , C ir c uitJudg e s. P ER CURIAM . Plaintiff Mark L eder toug a ppeals fr om the district court’s a war d of
summa ry jud g me nt i n fa

vo r of de fe nd ant tow ing c omp anie s. Th e a c tio n s te ms f ro m th e a lle g e dly
wr on g fu l r e mov a l, i mpo un dme nt a nd e ve ntu a l sa le of

L e de rt ou g ’s tr a c tor tr uc k b y de fe nd ants Boule vard & Trumbull Towing , Inc., and O fficia l Towing , Inc. for approx imately

$6000. The

1 tow in g co mpa

nie s h a d a c te d at th e re qu e st o f H ome De po t U SA, Inc ., on wh os e pr op e rt

y in Ros e vil le , M ic hig an, the tr uc k h a d b e e n p ark e d f

or ov e r a y e ar. L e de rt ou g ins ist s th a t he ha d H ome De po t’ s c on se nt t o pa

rk his tr uc k o n it s p ro pe rt

y and that hi s tr

uc k c ou ld n ot t

he re fo re be lawf

ull yNo. 09-1065

Ledertoug v. Boulev ard &Trumbull T owing, Inc.

L eder toug’ s complaint states claims ag ainst Home De pot as well. T h es e claims wer e 2 vo luntari ly dis mis se d purs ua nt to a ne g oti a te d se ttl e me nt b e fo re summa ry jud g me nt w a s g ra

nte d to the towing companies. - 2 - treated as a

n abandone d vehicle. Yet, as the district court obser ved in its summary

judgme nt 2 opinion, L eder

toug conce ded that discovery had produce d no evidenc e that the towingcompanies had ac ted other tha

n in compliance w ith Michig an law. Acc ording ly , there beingno evidenc e of a brea ch of duty

owed to L eder

toug by the towing companies, the district court held there wa s no g enuine iss ue of material fa ct and a war ded judg ment to the defe ndants on L eder toug’ s claims for statutory violation, neg lige nce a

nd conver sion. On appeal, L eder

toug has not raised any arg ument that is not fairly

and ade quately

addre ssed in the district court’s opinion. Although we review the district court’s ruling de novo, we f ind no
err or. Ac cording ly , finding that a sepa rate opinion would be duplicative and unne cessa ry , we he reby AF F IRM the district court’s judg ment on the basis of its opinion.
응급상황이 발생하면 911에 전화하십시오. 증상을 말씀하시고 해외여행 또는 크루즈 여행을 했다고 알려주십시오. CS316091-D

Mar 27, 2020 4 PM

14일 기록을 사용하는 방법

하루에 두 번(아침과 밤) 체온과 발열, 기침 또는 숨쉬기 어려움 같은 COVID-19 증상을 

기록하십시오. 14일 동안 매일 이렇게 하십시오.

1. 당일부터 14일까지 기록에 날짜를 입력하십시오. 당일은 외국에서 출발하거나 크루즈 

여행에서 돌아온 날입니다.

2. 오늘 날짜부터 체온과 증상을 기록하십시오.

3. 건강 모니터링은 외국에서 출발하거나 크루즈 여행에서 돌아온 날로부터 14일 후 

완료됩니다.

2020 년 4 월 1 일

2020 년 4 월 2 일

2020 년 4 월 3 일

2020 년 4 월 4 일

2020 년 4 월 5 일

2020 년 4 월 6 일

일 날짜 증상 체온

당일

1

일차

2

일차

일차

일차

3

4

5

샘플

일차

무증상 97.4 F

무증상 98.6 F

무증상 96.9 F

무증상 98.6 F

무증상 98.0 F

무증상 98.6 F

무증상 97.3 F

무증상 98.6 F

무증상 96.5 F

무증상 98.6 F

당일은 외국에서 출발하거나 크루즈 여행에서 돌아온

날입니다.
CS316091-D www.cdc.gov/coronavirus

Mar 27, 2020 4 PM

일 날짜 증상 체온

당일

첫째날

2일차

3일차

4일차

5일차

6일차

7일차

8일차

9일차

10일차

11일차

12일차

13일차

14일차

당일은 외국에서 출발하거나 크루즈 여행에서 돌아온

 날입니다.

14일 동안 매일 아래 공란에 증상과 체온을 기록하십시오.

아프면: • 집에 머무릅니다. 다른 사람과의 접촉을 피합니다. • COVID-19

에 감염되었을 수 있습니다. 대부분의 사람은 치료 없이 집에서 회복할 수 

있습니다. • 숨쉬기가 어렵거나 증상이 걱정된다면, 의료 서비스 제공자에게 

전화하거나 문자메시지를 보내십시오. 최근 여행과 증상에 대해 알려주십시오. • 

의사 진료실이나 응급실에 가기 전에 전화하십시오.

체온 및 증상 기록용 14일 일지
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 87162 / September 30, 2019

Admin. Proc. File Nos. 3-17874 and 3-17875

In the Matter of

VICTOR ALFAYA

NOTICE THAT INITIAL DECISION HAS BECOME FINAL

The time for filing a petition for review of the initial decision in this proceeding has 

expired. No such petition has been filed by Victor Alfaya and the Commission has not chosen to 

review the decision on its own initiative.

Accordingly, notice is hereby given, pursuant to Rule 360(d) of the Commission's Rules 

of Practice,1that the initial decision of the administrative law judge has become the final 

decision of the Commission with respect to Victor Alfaya.

2

The order contained in that decision 

is hereby declared effective. The initial decision ordered that, pursuant to Section 15(b) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Victor Alfaya is barred from associating with any broker, 

dealer, investment adviser, municipal securities dealer, municipal advisor, transfer agent, or 

nationally recognized statistical rating organization and from participating in an offering of 

penny stock.

For the Commission, by the Office of the General Counsel, pursuant to delegated 

authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

 Secretary

 

1

 17 C.F.R. § 201.360(d).

2

 Talman Harris and Victor Alfaya, Initial Decision Release No. 1381 (June 28, 2019), 2019

WL 2725327.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Allen, Appellant.

Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Lewis, J J.
| Delaware                                                          |                                             | 000-23143               |       | 13-3379479                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|------------|----------------------------------|
| (State or other jurisdictionof incorporation)                     |                                             | (CommissionFile Number) |       | (IRS EmployerIdentification No.) |
|                                                              |                                             |                    |       |                             |
|                                                                   | 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, New York |                    | 10591      |
|                                                                   | (Address of principal executive offices)         |                    | (Zip Code) |
| Registrant's telephone number, including area code (914) 789-2800 |

----

| 99.1   | Press Release issued July 16, 2013. |
|------------------|-------------------------------------|

----

|   |                            |   |                                         |
|--------|---------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|   | PROGENICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. |   |
|   |                            |   |                                         |
|   | By:                             |   | /s/ ANGELO W. LOVALLO, JR.                   |   |
|   |                            |   | Angelo W. Lovallo, Jr.                       |   |
|   |                            |   | Vice President, Finance & Treasurer      |   |
|   |                            |   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |
after using the toilet

WASH YOUR HANDS

1,000,000,000,000

germs can live in 

one gram of poop 

(That’s the weight of a paper clip!)
IIA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 1 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative 

to limiting the number of terms that a Member of Congress may serve. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. CRUZ (for himself, Mr. RUBIO, and Mr. LEE) introduced the following 

joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States relative to limiting the number of terms that 

a Member of Congress may serve. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 by the Congress: 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 1 IS 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. No person who has served 3 terms as 

3 a Representative shall be eligible for election to the House 

4 of Representatives. For purposes of this section, the elec5 tion of a person to fill a vacancy in the House of Rep6 resentatives shall be included as 1 term in determining 

7 the number of terms that such person has served as a Rep8 resentative if the person fills the vacancy for more than 

9 1 year. 

10 ‘‘SECTION 2. No person who has served 2 terms as 

11 a Senator shall be eligible for election or appointment to 

12 the Senate. For purposes of this section, the election or 

13 appointment of a person to fill a vacancy in the Senate 

14 shall be included as 1 term in determining the number 

15 of terms that such person has served as a Senator if the 

16 person fills the vacancy for more than 3 years. 

17 ‘‘SECTION 3. No term beginning before the date of 

18 the ratification of this article shall be taken into account 

19 in determining eligibility for election or appointment under 

20 this article.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6116
STEVEN GEORGE KELLY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:96-cr-00033-RLV-2; 5:04-cv-00071-RLV) Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 26, 2008 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven George Kelly, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Steven George Kelly seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Kelly has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
-  Home 

# In This Section

                      -  The GLS Today                          -  What does the GLS do? 
                        -  The St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation 
                        -  The Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway System 
                        -  Meet the Administrator 
                        -  Meet Our Team 
                        -  Careers at the GLS 
                        -  Contact the GLS 
                      -  Historic Photos and Other Artifacts 

# GLS Advisory Board meeting minutes February 9, 2021

Advisory Board Meeting Minutes (02-09-2021).pdf (170.87 KB)

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact					LaToya.James@dot.gov.*
#### Brantley *v.*Lucas.

April 21, 1910.

Petition for injunction. Before Judge Mitchell. Thomas superior court.

October 16, 1909.

*M. Baum,*for plaintiff. *E. L. Bryan,*for defendant.

Atkinson, J.

There was no abuse of discretion in refusing an. interlocutory injunction. *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Gecias, a/k/a Robert Haywood, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 73-383;

Second District

December 12, 1974.

Ralph Ruebner and Richard J. Wilson, both of State Appellate Defender’s Office, of Elgin, for appellant.

Jack Hoogasian, State’s Attorney, of Waukegan, for the People.

Opinion by

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE T. MORAN.
#### § 13.2 Policy.

This program is intended to reward the provision of original information regarding situations involving an illegal diversion, an attempted illegal diversion, or a conspiracy to divert special nuclear material or atomic weapons. The broad scope of this program is to help guard against the loss or diversion of such material and to prevent any use or disposition thereof inimical to the common defense and security.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0001063530
<NAME>                        Surgicial Safety Products, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Currency

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         188,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  9,981
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    6,119
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               204,100
<PP&E>                                         221,524
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 610,876
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          247,329
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       11,799
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   610,876
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               52,734
<CGS>                                          8,135
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  432,560
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               416,985
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             7,440
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>