alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Suicidal thoughts and behaviorsamong detained youth**
 
SuDoc Number:J 32.10:SU 3/3

Item Number:0718-A-09 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000951647
 
PDF | Mobi | ePub
 
March 3, 2020
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of  Neighborhood  Investment,
Ltd., on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  December 31, 2001 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the
undersigned, B. Stephen Bailey, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Wiggins *et al. v.*Marietta Trust *&*Banking Company.

Holden, J.

During- the August term, 1908, of court, the-defendants made a motion for a new trial, and a rule nisi signed by the presiding judge was issued August 31, 1908, requiring the plaintiffs to- “show cause before me, at Such time as may be fixed for hearing- motions during present term of the court, why the foregoing motion should not be *granted; ”*and an order was passed on that day, providing that movants *347have “until the hearing, whenever it may be, to prepare and present for approval a brief of the evidence in said ease,” and further providing ‘‘that said motion be heard and determined at such time as may be fixed for hearing motions during the present term of the court,” of which order and motion for a new trial counsel for the plaintiffs acknowledged service on September 1, 1908. On September 11, 1908, the court took a recess until the fourth Monday in October, 1908, and the presiding judge announced orally in open court that at the time last named “motions would be heard.” The court reconvened on the fourth Monday in October, 1908, and the next day the presiding judge in open court called for a hearing of the motion for a new trial and passed an order in which, after reciting that the motion “having been called in its order for trial and it appearing to the court that no brief of evidence has been prepared and presented for approval and' filing as required by law,” it was adjudged that the motion be dismissed. *Held:*

April 15, 1910.

Motion for new trial. Before Judge Edwards. Polk superior court.

October 27, 1908.

*J. M. Hunt*and *W. H. Terrell,*for plaintiffs in error.

*D. W. Blair*and *Bunn & Bunn,*contra.

1. The order dismissing the motion was not erroneous because there was “no written order of the court setting the said motion for hearing on the date the same was called.”

2. Nor was it erroneous to grant such order because, “movants having no notice that the same was set for that day, other than hearsay that motions would be heard, and not being present in open court when the verbal announcement was made, if such was made, that they were not bound.”

3. The failure of the official stenographer of the circuit to transcribe his notes and furnish counsel for movants with a copy of the evidence introduced upon the tidal did not make it erroneous to dismiss the motion on the ground that no brief of the evidence had been “prepared and presented for approval.” *Bryant*v. *Gray,*105 *Ga.*483 (30 S. E. 732); *Lambert Co.*v. *Bray & Co.,*127 *Ga.*452 (56 S. E. 513).

4. The court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to postpone the hearing of the motion in order to give more time for movants to' prepare and present for approval a brief of the evidence, and in dismissing the motion.

*Judgment affirmed,.*

*All the Justices concur.*
EXHIBIT 21.1
                                  ------------


                    SUBSIDIARIES OF CANANDAIGUA BRANDS, INC.


             PLACE OF INCORPORATION     SUBSIDIARY

             New York                   Batavia Wine Cellars, Inc.
             New York                   Canandaigua Wine Company, Inc.
             New York                   Canandaigua Europe Limited
             Netherlands                Canandaigua B.V.
             England and Wales          Canandaigua Limited
             New York                   Polyphenolics, Inc.
             New York                   Roberts Trading Corp.
             Delaware                   Franciscan Vineyards, Inc.
             California                 Allberry, Inc.
             California                 Cloud Peak Corporation
             California                 M.J. Lewis Corp.
             California                 Mt. Veeder Corporation
             Delaware                   Barton Incorporated
             Delaware                   Barton Brands, Ltd.
             Maryland                   Barton Beers, Ltd.
             Connecticut                Barton Brands of California, Inc.
             Georgia                    Barton Brands of Georgia, Inc.
             Illinois                   Barton Canada, Ltd.
             New York                   Barton Distillers Import Corp.
             Delaware                   Barton Financial Corporation
             Canada                     Schenley Distilleries Inc. / Les
                                           Distilleries Schenley Inc.
             Wisconsin                  Stevens Point Beverage Co.
             Illinois                   Monarch Import Company
             England and Wales          Matthew Clark plc
             England and Wales          Freetraders Group Limited
             England and Wales          Matthew Clark Wholesale Limited
             England and Wales          Matthew Clark Brands Limited
             England and Wales          The Gaymer Group Europe Limited
GUARANTEED WITHDRAWAL BENEFIT ENDORSEMENT

This  Endorsement  forms a part of the  Contract to which it is attached  and is
effective as of the Issue Date of the  Contract.  In the case of a conflict with
any provision in the Contract,  the provisions of this Endorsement will control.
The following provisions are hereby added to the Contract.

GUARANTEED WITHDRAWAL BENEFIT:
You can  make  partial  withdrawals  up to a total  of  [10%]  of your  Purchase
Payments (less prior Excess Adjusted Partial Withdrawals) in each Contract Year,
regardless of the amount of Contract  Value,  until the total of all  Guaranteed
Withdrawals  that have been  taken  over all years  equal  100% of the  Purchase
Payments  (less prior  Excess  Adjusted  Partial  Withdrawals).  The  withdrawal
amounts guaranteed under this provision are prior to any MVA.

EXCESS ADJUSTED PARTIAL WITHDRAWALS:
Excess Adjusted Partial Withdrawals are partial  withdrawals  (including any MVA
made or withdrawal  charges  assessed) in excess of Guaranteed  Withdrawals made
during the  Contract  Year,  multiplied  by the greater of 1 or the ratio of the
remaining available  Guaranteed  Withdrawals for all years (prior to the partial
withdrawal) to the Contract  Value (on the date of but prior to the  withdrawal)
adjusted for any MVA.

CONDITIONS FOR TERMINATION OF THE GUARANTEED WITHDRAWAL BENEFIT:
This benefit will terminate on the Income Date or when the Contract terminates.

BENEFIT CHARGE:
There is no additional charge for this benefit.


         Signed for Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America by:


                      /s/ Suzanne J. Pepin             /s/  Charles Kavitsky
                        Suzanne J. Pepin                  Charles Kavitsky
                Senior Vice President, Secretary              President
                   and Chief Legal Officer

S40254
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF DEERBROOK  PUBLISHING GROUP, INC. FOR THE
QUARTER  ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS.  THIS  EXHIBIT  SHALL NOT BE  DEEMED  FILED FOR THE
PURPOSE  OF  SECTION  11 OF THE  SECURITIES  ACT OF 1933 AND  SECTION  18 OF THE
SECURITIES  EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, OR OTHERWISE  SUBJECT TO THE LIABILITY OF SUCH
SECTIONS,  NOR SHALL IT BE DEEMED A PART OF ANY OTHER FILING WHICH  INCORPORATES
THIS REPORT BY REFERENCE,  UNLESS SUCH OTHER FILING EXPRESSLY  INCORPORATES THIS
EXHIBIT BY REFERENCE.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          75,565
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    149,239
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               169,971
<PP&E>                                         125,216
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,495
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 607,987
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,101,525
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,690
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,429,137
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   607,987
<SALES>                                          1,123
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,123
<CGS>                                            4,899
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,843,299
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,847,075)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,847,075)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (374,977)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,222,052)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.24)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Quotemedia.com, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Keith J. Randall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                                         
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/    Keith J. Randall                 
|    |  |                                         
|    |  | Keith J. Randall Chief Financial
Officer



May
11, 2004
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Ezell Sawyer, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 54537;

First District

October 4, 1971.

Gerald W. Getty, Public Defender, of Chicago, (Lee T. Hettinger, James N. Gramenos, and James J. Doherty, of Defender Project, of counsel,) for appellant.

Edward V. Hanrahan, State’s Attorney, of Chicago, (Robert A. Novelle and James Stemik, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel,) for the People.

Opinion by

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE BURKE.
#### Hospital for Joint Diseases, Plaintiff, and New York and Presbyterian Hospital, Respondent, v Travelers Property Casualty Insurance Company et al., Appellant.

[827 NYS2d 72]

In an action to recover no-fault medical payments, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Joseph, J.), dated October 31, 2005, which granted the motion of the plaintiff New York and Presbyterian Hospital for summary judgment on the third cause of action and denied the defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing that cause of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In support of its motion for summary judgment on the third cause of action, the plaintiff New York and Presbyterian Hospital, as assignee of William Browne, made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting a hospital bill with a signed certified mail return receipt and by submitting the affidavit of its third-party biller, who attested that he billed the defendants for the subject medical treatment and that the defendants failed to pay the claim or issue a denial of claim form (see *New York & Presbyt. Hosp. v Allstate Ins. Co.,*30 AD3d 492, 493 [2006]). In opposition to the motion the defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact, and in support of their cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the third cause of action the defendants failed to demonstrate their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. The defendants’ failure to timely object to the adequacy of the claim forms or seek verification of the assignment constituted a waiver of any defenses based thereon *(see Nyack Hosp. v Encompass Ins. Co.,*23 AD3d 535 [2005], *lv denied*7 NY3d 741 [2006]; *Hospital for Joint Diseases v Allstate Ins. Co.,*21 AD3d 348 [2005]; *Nyack Hosp. v Metropolitan Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.,*16 AD3d 564 [2005]; *New York Hosp. Med. Ctr. of Queens v AIU Ins. Co.,*8 AD3d 456 [2004]).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the motion *533and denied the cross motion. Schmidt, J.E, Adams, Skelos and Covello, JJ., concur.
#### Robert J. S. Hatfield *et al. v.*Michael Merod.

Fraudulent *conveyance—right of grantor's surety to impeach.*A surety of a party at the time he makes a conveyance of land, who is after-wards compelled to pay the grantor’s debt, is a creditor, within the meaning - of the statute, and has the right to impeach the deed as fraudulent, by bill in chancery. I

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of St. Clair county; the Hon. William H. Snyder, Judge, presiding.

Mr. Franklin A. McConaughy, for the plaintiffs in error.

Mr. James Dill, for the defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Dickey

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was a bill filed by Merod, a judgment creditor of Hatfield, to set aside a deed, made by Hatfield to his sister, Clark, purporting to convey his undivided interest in eighty acres of land, (his interest therein being, at that time, one undivided fourth thereof,) and to subject the same to sale in satisfaction of Herod’s judgment.

The bill charges that the deed was made without, valuable consideration, and for the purpose of hindering the creditors of Hatfield, and especially Merod. The decree of the circuit court granted the relief sought.

At the time of the making of the deed, Merod was bound as the security of Hatfield upon a promissory note to Dunn. Afterwards, Merod was compelled to pay Dunn, and brought suit against Hatfield for the money so paid, and recovered judgment against Hatfield. This proceeding is for the satisfaction of that judgment. Merod was then a creditor, in the sense of the statute, at the time of the making of the deed, and has a right, as such, to call in question the deed. *Choteau*v. Jones, 11 Ill. 300.

*114Ho other question of law is presented in this case. It is contended, however, that the proofs are not sufficient to support the decree. We have carefully examined all the evidence in the record, and find no good reason to disturb the decree. It is unnecessary to discuss the proofs in detail. It is enough to say 'that the testimony is contradictory, and that upon the whole evidence, properly weighed, we concur in the conclusion of the circuit court.

The decree is, therefore, affirmed.

*Decree affirmed.*
White Paper - Methane and VOC Emissions from Compressors 

>> Exterran's Comments

On behalf of Exterran and Mike Wasson (Director, Fleet Services), I submit the attached comments to the abovereferenced White Paper.

We would greatly appreciate confirmation of receipt, and we look forward to addressing any questions or 

comments the EPA has with respect to the attached or any other compressor­related matter.

Respectfully,

Bill Bowes

Associate General Counsel - North America

EXTERRAN

16666 Northchase Drive

Houston, Texas 77060

281.836.7040 office

281.836.8040 fax

bill.bowes@exterran.com

Bowes, Bill <Bill.Bowes@Exterran.com>

Mon 6/16/2014 4:11 PM

To:OilandGas.Whitepapers <OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov>; 

Cc:Wasson, Mike <Mike.Wasson@Exterran.com>; 

 1 attachment

Exterran Comments on Methane Compressor White Paper FINAL 06-16-14.pdf; 

White Paper - Methane and VOC Emissions from Compre... - OilandGas.Whitepapers Page 1 of 1

https://pod51045.outlook.com/owa/OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov/ 8/27/2014
**EXHIBIT 32.1****SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Surgical Partners International, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I, William H. Wilcox, President and Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        /s/ William H. Wilcox  William H. Wilcox  President and Chief Executive Officer   August 10, 2007
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 23, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-30321

Summary Calendar

 

IRIS HURST DAVIS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LARRY AYRES, GERALDINE BATTLEY, 

JAMES BOULANGER, NICK CICERO, 

DONALD DOUCET, DON EWING, CARL MCLEMORE,

MAURICE PICARD, MIX VOSBURG, JULIET WILLIAMS,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the 

United States District Court for the

Middle District of Louisiana, Baton Rouge

3:04-CV-431-JVP

--------------------

Before KING, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff Iris Hurst Davis brought suit in the United States

District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana against Larry

Ayers and nine other individuals acting in their individual and

official capacities as administrators of Pointe Coupee General

Hospital (“PCGH”) and against the Board of Directors of PCGH,

alleging that under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Plaintiff was deprived of

“liberty and property” without due process of law in violation of
the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States

Constitution and in violation of the Constitution of the State of

Louisiana when such defendants, individually and collectively,

terminated Plaintiff’s employment with PCGH. Defendants moved to

dismiss the suit under FRCP 12(b)(6) and the district court

granted such motion to dismiss. Plaintiff appeals to this Court.

We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the record excerpts,

and relevant portions of the record itself. For the reasons

stated by the district court in its memorandum ruling of November

15, 2004, we affirm the final judgment entered by that court on

February 11, 2005.

AFFIRMED.