alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32










CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the quarterly report of New Mexico Software, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned principal executive officer and the principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  May 13, 2011














/s/ Richard F. Govatski


Richard F Govatski, President


(Principal Executive Officer)














/s/ Teresa B. Dickey


Teresa B. Dickey, Treasurer


(Principal Financial Officer)
#### § 357.5 Cash management programs.

Oil pipeline companies subject to the provisions of the Commission's Uniform System of Accounts prescribed in part 352 and § 357.2 of this title that participate in cash management programs must file these agreements with the Commission. The documentation establishing the cash management program and entry into the program must be filed within 10 days of the effective date of the rule or entry into the program. Subsequent changes to the cash management agreement must be filed with the Commission within 10 days of the change.

[Order 634-A, 68 FR 62004, Oct. 31, 2003, as amended at 69 FR 9045, Feb. 26, 2004]
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 767 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to qualify homeless youth 

and veterans who are full-time students for purposes of the low income 

housing tax credit. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 13, 2019 

Mr. PORTMAN (for himself, Mr. BROWN, and Mr. KING) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to qualify 

homeless youth and veterans who are full-time students 

for purposes of the low income housing tax credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Housing for Homeless 

5 Students Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 767 IS

1 SEC. 2. HOMELESS YOUTH AND VETERANS WHO ARE FULL2 TIME STUDENTS QUALIFIED FOR PURPOSES 

3 OF THE LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Clause (i) of section 42(i)(3)(D) 

5 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by re6 designating subclauses (II) and (III) as subclauses (IV) 

7 and (V), respectively, and by inserting after subclause (I) 

8 the following new subclauses: 

9 ‘‘(II) a full-time student who, 

10 during any portion of the 7-year pe11 riod ending with the commencement 

12 of such individual’s continuous occu13 pation of any low-income unit or 

14 units, was an individual described in 

15 section 725(2) of the McKinney-Vento 

16 Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 

17 11434a(2)), 

18 ‘‘(III) a full-time student who, 

19 during any portion of the 5-year pe20 riod ending with the commencement 

21 of such individual’s continuous occu22 pation of any low-income unit or 

23 units, was an individual described in 

24 section 2002(1) of title 38, United 

25 States Code,’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 767 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply to determinations made before, 

3 on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Quotemedia, Inc. (the Company)
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Keith J. Randall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my best knowledge and
belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Keith J. Randall   
|    |  | Keith J. Randall       
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer
|    |  | November 14, 2006
### §9523. Establishment

#### (a) In general

There is established in the Agency a program—

(1) that shall be known as the MBDA Business Center Program;

(2) that shall be separate and distinct from the efforts of the Under Secretary under section ______101; 1 and

(3) under which the Under Secretary shall make Federal assistance awards to eligible entities to operate MBDA Business Centers, which shall, in accordance with section ______114, 1 provide technical assistance and business development services, or specialty services, to minority business enterprises.

#### (b) Coverage

The Under Secretary shall take all necessary actions to ensure that the MBDA Business Center Program, in accordance with section ______114, 1 offers the services described in subsection (a)(3) in all regions of the United States.

(Pub. L. 117–58, div. K, title I, §100113, Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 1451.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section ______101, referred to in subsec. (a)(2), probably means section 100101 of Pub. L. 117–58, which is classified to section 9511 of this title.

Section ______114, referred to in subsecs. (a)(3) and (b), probably means section 100114 of Pub. L. 117–58, which is classified to section 9524 of this title.

1 So in original. See References in Text note below.
#### § 2.22 Communication with the Commission.

Attorneys, relatives, or interested parties wishing a personal interview to discuss a specific case with a representative of the Commission must submit a written request to the appropriate office setting forth the nature of the information to be discussed. Such interview may be conducted by a Commissioner or assigned staff, and a written summary of each such interview shall be prepared and placed in the prisoner's file.

[43 FR 22707, May 28, 1978]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-4231

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus ROGER ALLEN HALL, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (CR-02-12) Submitted: June 19, 2003 Decided: June 24, 2003 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David H. Wilmoth, Elkins, West Virginia, for Appellant. Thomas E. Johnston, United States Attorney, Sherry L. Muncy, Assistant United States Attorney, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Roger Allen Hall pled guilty to causing a person to make a false statement in the acquisition of a firearm, a Ruger .22 caliber rifle, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6) (2000), and was sentenced to a term of 120 months imprisonment. Hall argues on appeal that the district court erred in finding that he attempted to obstruct justice during the investigation. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3C1.1 (2002). We affirm. Hall, a convicted felon, asked his son, Troy Hall, to buy a Ruger rifle for him and gave him the money for the purchase. A short time later, the rifle and another firearm were seized by officers from the West Virginia Department of Natural Resources (DNR) who came to Hall’s residence investigating the illegal taking of deer. Hall denied owning the Ruger and, after the officers left, called Troy and told him that, if he were asked about the Ruger, he should say that the gun was his, and that he had left it at his father’s house. The DNR officers later contacted the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF) for assistance. When Troy Hall was interviewed by ATF agents in December 2001, he first told them the false story sugg ested by his father, but then told them the truth. Hall contends that the § 3C1.1 adjustment was error in that his obstructive conduct did not occur during the investigation of the “instant offense,” as required under USSG § 3C1.1, because the* A state firearms charge remained pending against Hall when he was sentenced for the instant federal offense.
3 federal investigation had not begun when he told his son to lie about the Ruger rifle. *However, § 3C1.1 makes no distinction between a federal and a state investigation of the instant offense. United States v. Self , 132 F.3d 1039, 1042 (4th Cir. 1997). Although the state investigation initially focused on game violations, Hall instructed his son to lie in an attempt to evade firearms charges. The federal investigation of his conduct simply continued the work begun by the DNR officers. Moreover, even though Hall’s son recanted the lie, Hall’s attempt to obstruct the investigation was enough to warrant the adjustment. We therefore affirm the sentence imposed by the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1

Filed 1/16/15 P. v. Adams CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento)

----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

LONNIE B. ADAMS,

Defendant and Appellant.

C074836

(Super. Ct. No. 96F00018)

Defendant Lonnie B. Adams appeals from an order denying petitions to recall 

his so-called “three strikes” sentence of 26 years to life, brought pursuant to the 

provisions of the Three Strikes Reform Act of 2012 (the Act), codified at Penal Code 

section 1170.126 (undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code).

1

 (See Teal v. 

Superior Court (2014) 60 Cal.4th 595.)

Defendant’s petitions to recall his sentence and for resentencing and his motion to 

reconsider were denied upon determination that he was not eligible for relief under the 

Act because the commitment offense was making criminal threats and because he was 

 

1

 Defendant filed petitions for writ of habeas corpus, which were construed to be 

petitions to recall his sentence. He thereafter filed a petition to recall his sentence.
2

armed with a deadly weapon in the course of commission of the offense. (See §§ 667, 

subd. (e)(2)(C)(iii), 1170.12, subd. (c)(2)(C)(iii), 1170.126, subds. (b) & (e)(1), 1192.7, 

subd. (c) (38).)

Counsel was appointed to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an 

opening brief setting forth the facts of the case and requesting this court to review the 

record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende

(1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Counsel advised defendant of his right to file a supplemental 

brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief.

Defendant timely filed a supplemental brief, arguing that since making criminal 

threats was not defined as a serious or violent felony at the time he committed the 

offense, the conviction cannot be used to render him ineligible for relief under the Act. 

The issue is now pending review by the California Supreme Court. (See People v. 

Johnson (2014) 226 Cal.App.4th 620, review granted July 30, 2014, S219454; Braziel v. 

Superior Court (2014) 225 Cal.App.4th 933, review granted July 30, 2014, S218503.) 

However, defendant remains ineligible for resentencing under the Act, as the 

determination that he was armed with a deadly weapon during the commission of the 

offense disqualifies him for relief. (See People v. Bradford (2014) 227 Cal.App.4th 

1322, 1336-1340; People v. Elder (2014) 227 Cal.App.4th 1308, 1314-1317.)

Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error 

that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.

DISPOSITION

The judgment (order) is affirmed.

 RAYE , P. J.

We concur:

 BLEASE , J.

 NICHOLSON , J.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to this park navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to this park information section
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Redwood
National and State ParksCalifornia
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Financial Statments of The Smithfield Companies, Inc. for
the year ended March 31, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such Consolidated Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       7,679,907
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,329,593
<ALLOWANCES>                                    71,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,900,668
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,989,628
<PP&E>                                       6,456,964
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,231,045
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,830,607
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,231,837
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,503,869
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,094,901
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,830,607
<SALES>                                     20,425,385
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,524,909
<CGS>                                       13,893,306
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,186,196
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2998
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,582,115
<INCOME-TAX>                                   505,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,077,115
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,077,115
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .45
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b)
Certifications
 
 The
undersigned officers certify that this report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that
the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vantone
International Group, Inc.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Vantone International Group, Inc. and will be retained by Vantone International
Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
 
 August
      18, 2009
                /s/ Honggang
      YuHonggang
      Yu (Chief Executive Officer)August
      18, 2009
                /s/ Jichun
      LiJichun
      Li (Chief Financial Officer)
Searched for **http://www.serve.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.serve.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
COVID-19

Financial Fraud

TELE-TOWN HALL

TUESDAY

OCT. 6, 2020

4 – 5 p.m. ET

Join the U.S. Securities and 

Exchange Commission, the

Federal Trade Commission, 

the U.S. Attorney’s Office 

for the Eastern District of 

Pennsylvania, and the Federal 

Bureau of Investigation for a 

Tele-Town Hall.

Learn about potential scams 

during the COVID-19 pandemic 

and the most common tricks 

fraudsters use.

EVENT IS FREE

Pre-Registration Is Not 

Required

• In order to participate, go to 

www.sec.gov between 3:30 

and 4 p.m. on October 6 and 

click the event link on the 

home page.

• Please submit questions for 

speakers in advance to:

SECPhillyOutreach@sec.gov

Moderated by 

KELLY L. GIBSON

Director

SEC Philadelphia

Regional Office

SPEAKERS

SCOTT THOMPSON

Associate Director

SEC Philadelphia

Regional Office

JON MILLER STEIGER

Director

East Central Region

Federal Trade Commission

RONALD A. SARACHAN

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Deputy Chief, Criminal Division

White Collar Crime 

Eastern District of PA

PATRICK J. DUFFY

Supervisory Special Agent

Federal Bureau of 

Investigation

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Editorial Note on Subpart G of Part 42
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart G of part 42 appear by Order No. 2679-2003, 68 FR 51364, 51365, 51366, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 42.522 New construction. ( a ) *Design and construction.* Each new facility constructed by, on behalf of, or for the use of a recipient shall be designed and constructed in such a manner that the facility is readily accessible to and usable by handicapped persons, if the construction was commenced after the effective date of this subpart. Any alterations to existing facilities shall, to the maximum extent feasible, be made in an accessible manner. Any alterations to existing facilities shall, to the maximum extent feasible, be made in an accessible manner.
( b ) *Conformance with Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards.* ( 1 ) Effective as of March 7, 1988, design, construction, or alteration of buildings in conformance with sections 3-8 of the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards (UFAS) (appendix A to 41 CFR subpart 101-19.6) shall be deemed to comply with the requirements of this section with respect to those buildings. Departures from particular technical and scoping requirements of UFAS by the use of other methods are permitted where substantially equivalent or greater access to and usability of the building is provided.
( 2 ) For purposes of this section, section 4.1.6(1)(g) of UFAS shall be interpreted to exempt from the requirements of UFAS only mechanical rooms and other spaces that, because of their intended use, will not require accessibility to the public or beneficiaries or result in the employment or residence therein of persons with physical handicaps.
( 3 ) This section does not require recipients to make building alterations that have little likelihood of being accomplished without removing or altering a load-bearing structural member.
[45 FR 37622, June 3, 1980, as amended by Order No. 1249-88, 53 FR 3206, Feb. 4, 1988]
### §1162. Authority of Secretary to operate, maintain, and repair Government-owned property; necessary facilities, services, and equipment for Federal employees and dependents

In carrying out the provisions of this subchapter, the Secretary is authorized—

(1) to operate, maintain, and repair such Government-owned property, both real and personal, and other facilities held by the Secretary on the Pribilof Islands as may be necessary; and

(2) to provide the employees of the Department of Commerce and other Federal agencies and their dependents, at reasonable rates to be determined by the Secretary, with such facilities, services, and equipment as he deems necessary, including, but not limited to, food, fuel, shelter, and transportation.

(Pub. L. 89–702, title II, §202, Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1093; Pub. L. 98–129, §2, Oct. 14, 1983, 97 Stat. 838.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1983—Pub. L. 98–129 substituted provisions authorizing the Secretary to operate, maintain, and repair such Government-owned property, both real and personal, and other facilities held by the Secretary on the Pribilof Islands as may be necessary, and to provide the employees of the Department of Commerce and other Federal agencies and their dependents, at reasonable rates to be determined by the Secretary, with such facilities, services, and equipment as he deems necessary, including, but not limited to, food, fuel, shelter, and transportation, for provisions authorizing the Secretary to enter into contracts or agreements or leases with, or to issue permits to, public or private agencies or persons, including the natives of the Pribilof Islands, in accordance with such terms and conditions as he deemed desirable for the use of any Government-owned real or personal property located on the islands, for the furnishing of accommodations for tourists and other visitors, for educational, recreational, residential, or commercial purposes, for the operation, maintenance, and repair of Government-owned facilities and utilities, for the transportation and storage of food and other supplies, and for such other purposes as the Secretary deemed desirable.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (a)
    
    the Form 10-Q Report of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 filed
on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ JOHANN DREYERJohann DreyerChief Executive Officer
§ 2.73 Parole suitability criteria. ( a ) In accordance with D.C. Code 24-404(a), the Commission shall be authorized to release a prisoner on parole in its discretion after the prisoner has served the minimum term of the sentence imposed, if the following criteria are met: ( 1 ) The prisoner has substantially observed the rules of the institution;
( 2 ) There is a reasonable probability that the prisoner will live and remain at liberty without violating the law; and
( 3 ) In the opinion of the Commission, the prisoner's release is not incompatible with the welfare of society.
( b ) It is the policy of the Commission with respect to District of Columbia Code offenders that the minimum term imposed by the sentencing court presumptively satisfies the need for punishment for the crime of which the prisoner has been convicted, and that the responsibility of the Commission is to account for the degree and the seriousness of the risk that the release of the prisoner would entail. This responsibility is carried out by reference to the Salient Factor Score and the Point Assignment Table at § 2.80. However, there may be exceptional cases in which the gravity of the offense is sufficient to warrant an upward departure from § 2.80 and denial of parole.
[65 FR 45888, July 26, 2000, as amended at 68 FR 41530, July 14, 2003]