CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District

Rule No(s): 466 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: Amended October 28, 2010

Rule Title(s): Solvent Cleaning

Date Submitted to ARB: December 17, 2010

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): Amended September 25, 2008

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Kevin J. Williams Phone Number: (916) 874-4851 E-mail Address: kjwilliams@airquality.org

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

The adopted amendments exempt sanitizing products whic h are labeled and applied to food-contact surfaces

that are used to process dry and low-mo isture food products and are not rinsed pr ior to contact with food. Such

sanitizers are essential in preventing contamination by salmonella and other pathogens in dry and low moisture

food products. The amendments were necessary because VOC-compliant sanitizers are not available.

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2

(CO) PM TAC (name):

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, w ill result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach referenc e(s) for emission factor(s)

and other information. Attach calculation sheet showi ng how the emission information provided below was determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Ca tegory: The 2009 SIP included a commitment to reduce VOC

emissions from surface preparation and cleanup solvents, including Rule 466, by 0.59 tpd from the Sacramento

district in 2018. Surface preparation and cleanup solvents are included in multiple rules. The increase in emissions

due to the Rule 466 amendments is insignificant (0.005 t pd) and does not change the esti mated reduction from this

control measure.

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions : 2018 Area Affected: Sacramento County

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) :

N/ACALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control M easure: 2.2 tpd from the Sacramento district

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the Contro l Measure: 0.59 tpd from the Sacramento district

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): N/A

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed) : 0.59 tpd from the Sacramento district

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission forecasting and

planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 T PY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: 2

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100%

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 0 Percent in Nonattainment Area: N/A%

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) : N/A

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) 301 of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Reductions are: Section 304 specifies that a control device may be

used as an alternative to complying with the emissions limit s of Section 301. The contro l device must have a control

device efficiency of at least 95% and a collection efficiency of at least 90%.

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): 301 Wo rk Practice Standards in Section(s): 302-303

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): 501 Reporting Requirements in Section(s): N/ACALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 3

(Electronic Format)

5/1/2002 3

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion: The increase in emissions due to the amendments is insignificant and does not impact RFP or attainment.