2013 Revision to the Sacramento Regional 8-Hour Ozone Appendix C

- Proposed Control Measures

Attainment and Reasonable Further Progress Plan September26, 2013


### Control Measure Number: FRAQMD

- 

### 3.19 Control Measure Title: Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations Date: February 2,2007 Control Measure Description Automotive refinishing coatings are used on motor vehicles and other mobile equipment, primarily by auto body repair and paint shops and automotive dealerships. VOC emissions from the surface coating operations result from the evaporation of the organic solvents used in the coatings. These emissions occur in a number of places during the operation, including surface preparation and cleanup, application of the coating, drying ofthe parts, and cleanup ofthe application equipment. On October 20, 2005, CARB adopted a Suggested Control Measure (SCM) for automotive coatings. The SCM would introduce several significant changes into FRAQMD Rule 3.19, Vehicle and Motor Equipment Coating Operations, such as:

• Consolidation of limits for Group I and Group II vehicles
• Consolidation ofthe primers, primersealers, and primersurfacer categories
• Deletion of the multi-stage topcoats category, and replacement with separate limits for color coats and clear coats
• Elimination ofthe specialty coatings category, with specific limitsfor each type of coating, and a general limit applicableto all other coatings.
• LowerVOC limits for most coating categories. The proposed control measure will evaluate the information from CARB’s SCM and propose amendments to Rule 3.19. Emission Inventory—2018 The population growth rate in South Sutter is purely based on the current Sutter County population growth rate projected by SACOG. The potential growth of proposed South SutterSpecific Plan (now called Sutter Pointe Specific Plan) is notfactored in. VOC Planning Inventory(tpd) EIC Code EIC Descrtption 2018 Automobile Retinish 230-218-9000-0000 Coatings. Unspecified Total 0.0035

Automotive Refinishing FRAQMD-3. 19 Page C-812013 Revision to the Sacramento Regional 8-HourOzone Appendix C

- Proposed Control Measures

Attainmentand Reasonable Further Progress Plan September26. 2013 

### Emission Reductions Implementation VOC Emission Reduction (tpd) EIC Description Adoption Date Date 2018 Automotive 2016 2017 00008 Refinishing 

### Cost Effectiveness The cost effectiveness is expected to range between $5,560 and $77,300 per ton of ROG reduced. Authority The Feather River Air Quality Management District has the authority to propose rules and regulations to the District Board for adoption under I-ISC 40001. Implementation The implementation of this control measure does not involve any other agency other than the Feather River Air Quality Management District. References 1. El Dorado County AQMD Rule 230, Adopted September27, 1994. 2. Feather RiverAQMD Rule 3.19, Adopted August 6, 1998. 3. Placer CountyAPCD Rule 234, Revised April 9, 1998. 4. Sacramento Metro AQMD Rule 459, Revised October2, 1997. 5. Yolo-Solano AQMD Rule 2.26, Revised August 13, 1997. 6. Draft Staff Report, Rule 459, SMAQMD. August 2001. 7. Rule adoption files, Rule 459, SMAQMD. 8. California Air Resources Board, Staff Report for The Proposed Suggested Control Measures Automotive Coatings, October2005 9. California ARB Forecasted Emissions by Summary Category. Ozone SIP Sacramento NAA Projections (vi .06_RF980) www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinvlo3siplfcemssumcat_03v1 .06.php. November 16, 2006 10. Control Measure, FRAQMD —3.19, February 2,2007

Automotive Refinishing FRAOMD-3j 9 Page C-822013 Revision to the Sacramento Regional 8-Hour Ozone Appendix C

- Proposed Control Measures

Attainment and Reasonable Further Progress Plan Seutember26. 2013 Table H-4 FRAQMO Statioriary!Area Source Control Measures Considered Measure Opportunityfor No. Title Current Requirements Strengthening Conclusion Establish VOC limits on Not Recommended Adhesivesand N adhesives and sealants

- Evaluated [or Sealants one ~itarto limits used in Attainment SCAGMO Advancement Architectural ReducetheVOC limits 315 Coatin VOC limits on coatings on thecoatings Control Measure

gs consistentwiththe SCM Degreasing! Kee lid ci se ontan~s ter RequireVOC limitson 314 Solvent ~ ~ degreasinglsolvent Control Measure Cleaning

- cleaning process. Establish VOC limits on Not Recommended 2 Unspecrned None coatingsthat have not

- Evaluated for Coatings been established in Attainment another rule. Advancement Automotive ReducetheVOC limits 319 Reflnishin VOC limitson coatings on thecoatings Control Measure

9 consistentwith the SCM Paper, Fabric, None EstablishVOC limits on Not Recommended coating coatings.

- No sources

NOxlimits on boilerlsteam generatorswith rated heatinput Require NOxlimitsfor N t d d Boilers and capacity oft mmBtulhrorgreater; boilerbetween 1-5 ~vai~~T~ e 3.21 Steam -1-5 rnmBTUThrMnual Tune Up, mmBtuThr, and reduce Attainment Generators >5 mmBTUihr using gaseousfuel NOx limitforboiler>5 ~lva t

30 ppm. >5 mmBTtJ/hrusing non- mmBtu/hr ncemen. gaseousfuel 40 ppm NOx limits on boilerlsteam generatorswith rated heatinput Boilers and capacityof I mmBtulhrorgreater; Reduce NOx limitto6 Not Recommended 3.21 Steam i-a mmBTUIhrAnnual Tune tip, >~ BTU/h N So Generators >5 mmBTUihr using gaseous ~ ppm r mm r

— 0 urces

30 ppm, >5 mmBTIJIhrusing nongaseousfuel 40 ppm 3.22 IC Engines None NO’xlimits on Control Measure Not Recommended 38/39 Stora T ~•5 Requires useofa floating motor Lowerapplicability

- Evaluated [or

ge an vapor l~s control device threshold Attainment Advancement Establish CAP andTrade ,~, + r, Emission RedUCUOT~ OL ~ecommen e Capand Trade None Programsimilarto SCAQMDs RECLAIM Advancement Establish standardsto Not Recommended Commercial N control VOC emissions

- Evaluated for Cooking forCommercial Cooking Attainment (i.e. charboilers) Advancement Livestock None Lowerapplicability Not Recommended Waste threshold

—No Sources Establish standardsto Not Recomme ded reduce evaporativeVOC ~ •~ Wineries None ~

- va ua or feimentation process at Advancement

Appendix H: ReasonablyAvailable Control Measures Analysis Page H-22

### Is this helpful? Is there anything else you need re 3.19?

John Ungvarsky Environmental Scientist USEPA, Region 9 75 Hawthorne St. (AIR-2) San Francisco, CA 94105 415-972-3963 510-667-9743 (alternate work site)