alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 41.3 Shortened procedure.

If the audited person subject to a Commission order described in § 41.1 notifies the Commission that it seeks to challenge one or more audit findings, or proposed remedies, or both, in any combination, by the shortened procedure, the Commission shall thereupon issue a notice setting a schedule for the filing of memoranda. The person electing the use of the shortened procedure, and any other interested entities, including the Commission staff, shall file, within 45 days of the notice, an initial memorandum that addresses the relevant facts and applicable law that support the position or positions taken regarding the matters at issue. Reply memoranda shall be filed within 20 days of the date by which the initial memoranda are due to be filed. Only participants who filed initial memoranda may file reply memoranda. Subpart T of part 385 of this chapter shall apply to all filings. Within 20 days after the last date that reply memoranda under the shortened procedure may be timely filed, the audited person who elected the shortened procedure may file a motion with the Commission requesting a trial-type hearing if new issues are raised by a party. To prevail in such a motion, the audited person must show that a party to the shortened procedure raised one or more new issues of material fact relevant to resolution of a matter in the shortened procedure such that fundamental fairness requires a trial-type hearing to resolve the new issue or issues so raised. Parties to the shortened procedure and the Commission staff may file responses to the motion. In ruling upon the motion, the Commission may determine that some or all of the issues be litigated in a trial-type hearing.

[Order 675, 71 FR 9706, Feb. 27, 2006]
Exhibit 10

Court Order on Trustee Compensation dated October 20, 2005

|STATE OF MINNESOTA                                                     | DISTRICT COURT             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------
|COUNTY OF RAMSEY                                                       | SECOND JUDICIAL COURT      
|                                                                       | Court File No. C5-72-386008
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|In the Matter of the Trust known as Great Northern Iron Ore Properties | ORDER                      
|                                                                      

This matter came on for
hearing before Referee Dean Maus on October 19, 2005, upon the Petition for Instructions filed by Joseph S. Micallef, Roger W.
Staehle, Robert A. Stein and John H. Roe III, the duly appointed and acting Trustees of the Trust known as Great Northern Iron Ore
Properties.

Sue Ann Nelson of Fredrikson
& Byron, P.A., appeared on behalf of the Trustees of the Trust known as Great Northern Iron Ore Properties.

The Court, having heard the
arguments of counsel, and based upon the Petition, the affidavits filed in support of the Petition and the entire files and record
herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1.       Due,
published and mailed notice of this hearing was given pursuant to the Courts Order dated August 24, 2005, as more fully
appears from the proof of publication and the Affidavits of Mailing contained in the file.

2.       The
requested increase in the compensation of the President of the Trust from $150,000 per annum to $160,000 per year and an increase
in the bonus component from a maximum of $50,000 to a maximum of $60,000 per year (computed as 1% of the excess of the gross
income of the Trust over $5 million for the year up to the maximum of $60,000), both effective as of July 1, 2005, with the
$60,000 bonus component payable in full for 2005 subject to the formula calculation, is granted.

3.       The
requested increase in the compensation of the Trustees other than the President from $50,000 to $60,000 per year, effective as of
July 1, 2005, is granted.

|                       |                           
|---------------------- | --------------------------
|Order Recommended by:  |                           
|                      
|/s/   Dean Maus        | /s/   Margaret M. Marrinan
|                       |                           
|Dean Maus              | Margaret M. Marrinan      
|District Court Referee | Judge of District Court   
|October 19, 2005       | October 20, 2005          
|                      

---
#### § 523.14 Industrial good time.

Extra good time for an inmate employed in Federal Prison Industries, Inc., is automatically awarded, beginning on the first day of such employment, and continuing as long as the inmate is employed by Federal Prison Industries, unless the award is disallowed. An inmate on a waiting list for employment in Federal Prison Industries is not awarded industrial good time until actually employed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  SBA Leadership 
-  Kimberly McLeod 

#   Kimberly McLeod

Assistant Administrator

Office of Hearings and Appeals

Ms. McLeod serves as the Assistant Administrator for the Office of Hearings and Appeals. In this role, she is the Chief Hearing Officer leading OHA as the independent office of the SBA that provides quasi-judicial adjudication of SBA program decision appeals including NAICS appeals, CVE protests, 8(a) designations and other proceedings.

Ms. McLeod joins SBA from the Department of Veterans Affairs, where she served for 13 years in several key positions. She served as the Deputy Executive Director of VA’s Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization; Deputy Vice Chairman for the Board of Veterans Appeals, where she managed the Board’s goal of conducting 20,000 hearings; Executive Director of VA’s Office of Labor Management Relations, where she led the Department’s national labor relations policy and negotiations with five national labor unions jointly representing 290,000 VA employees; and Senior Attorney with VA’s Office of General Counsel.

Ms. McLeod also spent several years in private practice and with a non-profit organization. Ms. McLeod holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from Howard University and a Juris Doctor from University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law.
USEPA REGION IX

TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT

for

SJVUAPCD Rule 9510

ATTACHMENT 4
10 days 

Application 

I 

Yes 

t 

Project deemed ccmplek 

P Application Review Process 

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution CoddIlsW 

March 01,2035 

Completeness Letker 

to Applicant 

Letter to Land UsePgency 

- Emissions Cdculah 

- Project R evie# 

30 days 

Proposed ON-SITE 

Emlsslon Redudons? 

00% Requ~ ++- Reductions met 

hb Yes 

hb 

T 

Calculation of OFF-SE 

Emlsslon RedudmnFee 

onltorlng an 

Reporbng 

Has applcant 

submltteda Fee 

T 

Evaluation Fee In- (Note ') 

Letter to Land Use Agency 

hb X 

X X 

T T I T 

Calculation of OFF-SE 

Emlsslon RedudmnFee 

Payment by Applicant 

Note. An In\!nlra 5~111 hn 1ccl8nd of nnstrirl nrnrnss~nn rnst nrrnndc harpadrahmb 

Payment by Applicant Payment by Appl~cant
#### Milton H. Ansorge, Inc., Respondent, v. Eugene W. Wood, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Present—Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.; Lewis, J., not voting.
#### § 549.11 Program responsibility.

Each institution's Health Services Administrator (HSA) and Clinical Director (CD) are responsible for the operation of the institution's infectious disease program in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
     In  connection  with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Green Mountain Power
Corporation  (the  "Company")  for  the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I,  Christopher  L.  Dutton,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.   1350, as adopted pursuant to   906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that:
     (1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and
     (2)     the  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.



/s/Christopher  L.  Dutton
--------------------------
Christopher  L.  Dutton
Chief  Executive  Officer
March  11,  2004
§ 48.8 Written comments and requests for a hearing. ( a ) Any person who believes that the Attorney General should or should not approve a proposed arrangement, may at any time after filing of the application until 30 days after publication in the Federal Register of the notice required in § 48.6, ( 1 ) File written comments stating the reasons why approval should or should not be granted, and/or
( 2 ) File a request that a hearing be held on the application. A request for a hearing shall set forth the issues of fact to be determined and the reasons that a hearing is required to determine them.
( b ) Any person may within 30 days after the filing of any comment or request pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, file a reply for the consideration of the Attorney General.
( c ) After the expiration of the time for filing of replies in accordance with § 48.7 and this section the Attorney General shall either approve or deny approval of the arrangement, in accordance with § 48.14, or shall order that a hearing be held.
<PAGE>


Exhibit 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February 14,
2003 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Analex Corporation
and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
December 31, 2002, in the following Registration Statements:

1.   Registration Statement Number 333-37059 (Hadron, Inc. 1994 Stock Option
     Plan) on Form S-8

2.   Registration Statement Number 333-42035 (Hadron, Inc. 1997 Employee Stock
     Purchase Plan) on Form S-8

3.   Registration Statement Number 333-96297 (Hadron, Inc. 1994 Stock Option
     Plan) on Form S-8

4.   Registration Statement Number 333-96299 (Hadron, Inc. 1997 Employee Stock
     Purchase Plan) on Form S-8

5.   Registration Statement Number 333-60440 (Hadron, Inc. 1997 Employee Stock
     Purchase Plan) on Form S-8

6.   Registration Statement Number 333-60442 (Hadron, Inc. 2000 Stock Option
     Plan) on Form S-8.


                                                  Ernst & Young LLP
September 4, 2003
McLean, Virginia
CS 316439-E 04/29/2020

Поделитесь фактами о COVID-19

Узнавайте факты о коронавирусе (COVID-19) и помогайте остановить распространение слухов.

ФАКТ

5

Вы можете помочь остановить 

COVID-19, зная признаки и симптомы, 

которые могут включать:

ФАКТ

4

Существует несколько простых условий, 

выполняя которые, вы поможете 

сохранить как свое здоровье, так и 

здоровье других людей.

• жар;

• кашель;

• одышку.

Немедленно обратитесь за медицинской 

помощью, если у вас или у кого-либо из ваших 

близких появятся тревожные критические 

симптомы, в том числе: 

• затрудненное дыхание;

• постоянная боль или давление в груди;

• новые признаки спутанности сознания или 

невозможность проснуться;

• синеватый оттенок губ или лица.

Этот список не является исчерпывающим. Пожалуйста, 

проконсультируйтесь с вашим поставщиком медицинских 

услуг по поводу любых других симптомов, которые 

являются серьезными или настораживающими.

ФАКТ

1

Любой человек может 

испытать на себе воздействие 

болезни, независимо от 

своей расовой или этнической 

принадлежности. 

Страх и беспокойство по поводу 

COVID-19 могут заставить людей 

избегать или отталкивать других, 

даже если они не подвержены риску 

распространения вируса. 

ФАКТ

2

Для большинства людей 

непосредственный риск 

серьезно заболеть, 

заразившись вирусом, 

вызывающим COVID-19, 

считается низким.

Пожилые люди и люди любого 

возраста, которые имеют серьезные 

основные заболевания, могут 

подвергаться повышенному риску 

развития более серьезных осложнений 

вследствие COVID-19.

• Часто мойте руки с водой и мылом в течение 

не менее 20 секунд, особенно после того, как 

вы прочистили нос, покашляли или чихнули; 

посетили ванную комнату; и до приема пищи или 

приготовления пищи.

• Находясь в общественных местах, носите тканевую 

маску для лица, прикрывающую нос и рот.

• Избегайте прикосновений к глазам, носу и рту 

немытыми руками.

• Оставайтесь дома, если вы заболели.

• Прикрывайте рот и нос салфеткой во время кашля 

или чихания, а затем выбрасывайте салфетку в 

урну.

Кто-либо, прошедший 

карантин или выпущенный 

из изоляции, не представляет 

риск заражения для 

других людей. 

Для получения актуальной информации 

о коронавирусной болезни 2019 года 

посетите веб-сайт CDC (Центра по 

контролю и профилактике заболеваний).

ФАКТ

3

cdc.gov/coronavirus
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7409
HENRY LEE HUNT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusGARY DIXON; J.B. FRENCH; KEN HARRIS; LIEUTENANT PEELE; SARGEANT HARRELL, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-94-305-5-CT-BO) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 24, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Henry Lee Hunt, Appellant Pro Se. William McBlief, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. Hunt v. Dixon , CA-94-305-5-CT-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 28, 1995). In addition, we find that "some evidence" supported the decision of the prisondisciplinary board to sentence Appellant to disciplinary segregation. See Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Inst. v. Hill ,472 U.S. 445, 454-56 (1985). Finally, drawing all reasonable inferences favorable to Appellant, we find that he has not stated a claim for violation of either his First or Eighth Amendment rights.We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 6, 2018

No. 04-18-00286-CV

Jimmy MASPERO and Regina Maspero, Individually, and as Next Friends of Wyitt Maspero, 

Wynnsday Maspero, Wesley Maspero, Deceased, and Walter Maspero, Deceased, Minor 

Children,

Appellants

v.

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO,

Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CI14946

Honorable David Peeples, Judge Presiding

ORDER

After we granted Appellee’s first motion for an extension of time to file the brief, the 

brief was due on November 7, 2018. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b), (d). Before the due date, 

Appellee filed an unopposed second motion for extension of time to file the brief until November 

28, 2018.

Appellee’s motion is GRANTED. Appellee’s brief is due on November 28, 2018. 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of November, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
§ 17.44 Access eligibility. ( a ) Determinations of eligibility for access to classified information are separate from suitability determinations with respect to the hiring or retention of persons for employment by the Department or any other personnel actions.
( b ) The number of employees eligible for access to classified information shall be kept to the minimum required for the conduct of Department functions.
( c ) Eligibility for access to classified information shall be limited to classification levels for which there is a need for access. No person shall be granted eligibility higher than his or her need.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         84,240
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  49,042
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    42,869
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               176,151
<PP&E>                                         1,759,837
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,580,186
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          851,711
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,031
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,229,517
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,231,548
<SALES>                                        571,071
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               571,071
<CGS>                                          268,431
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  268,431
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               755,207
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (471,027)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (471,027)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                44,945
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (427,082)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.021)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.021)



</TABLE>
§ 157.9 Notice of application and notice of schedule for environmental review. ( a ) Notice of each application filed, except when rejected in accordance with § 157.8, will be issued within 10 business days of filing, and subsequently will be published in the Federal Register and copies of such notice sent to States affected thereby, by electronic means if practical, otherwise by mail. Persons desiring to receive a copy of the notice of every application shall so advise the Secretary.
( b ) For each application that will require an environmental assessment or an environmental impact statement, notice of a schedule for the environmental review will be issued within 90 days of the notice of the application, and subsequently will be published in the Federal Register.
[Order 653, 70 FR 8724, Feb. 23, 2005, as amended by Order 687, 71 FR 62920, Oct. 27, 2006]
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
 
                 THE GILLETTE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
 
                STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
 
                  YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994
 
      (MILLIONS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS, SHARES IN MILLIONS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  1996        1995         1994
                                                                 ------      -------      ------
<S>                                                              <C>         <C>          <C>
NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE -- ASSUMING NO DILUTION
 
  Net income as reported........................................ $948.7      $1069.1      $919.1
  Less: Preferred Stock Dividends, net of tax benefit...........   (4.6)        (4.7)       (4.7)
                                                                 ------      -------      ------
  Net income available to Common Shareholders................... $944.1      $1064.4      $914.4
                                                                 ======      =======      ======
  Average common shares outstanding.............................  553.5        549.9       548.2
  Reported net income per common share.......................... $ 1.71      $  1.94      $ 1.67
NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE -- ASSUMING FULL DILUTION
  Net income available to Common Shareholders (as above)........ $944.1      $1064.4      $914.4
  Add: Series C ESOP Preferred Stock dividend, net of tax
     benefit....................................................    4.6          4.7         4.7
  Deduct: Additional ESOP costs, net of tax benefit.............    (.7)        (1.6)       (2.2)
                                                                 ------      -------      ------
  Adjusted net income available to common shareholders.......... $948.0      $1067.5      $916.9
                                                                 ======      =======      ======
  Average common shares outstanding.............................  553.5        549.9       548.2
  Add: Conversion of Series C ESOP Preferred Stock..............    6.4          6.5         6.6
        Net additional common shares upon exercise of stock
       options..................................................   10.0          8.2         5.9
                                                                 ------      -------      ------
  Adjusted average common shares outstanding....................  569.9        564.6       560.7
                                                                 ------      -------      ------
  Net income per common share -- assuming full dilution......... $ 1.66      $  1.89      $ 1.64
</TABLE>
 
1994 per share amounts and average number of shares outstanding have been
restated to give effect to the two-for-one stock split effected as a 100% common
stock dividend to holders of record on June 1, 1995.
 
                                       14
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 886 

To amend the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 to make 

the Reclamation Water Settlements Fund permanent. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 27, 2019 

Mr. UDALL (for himself, Mr. HEINRICH, and Ms. CORTEZ MASTO) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Natural Resources 

MAY 23 (legislative day, MAY 22), 2019 

Committee discharged; referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 

2009 to make the Reclamation Water Settlements Fund 

permanent. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Indian Water Rights 

5 Settlement Extension Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RECLAMATION WATER SETTLEMENTS FUND. 

7 Section 10501 of the Omnibus Public Land Manage8 ment Act of 2009 (43 U.S.C. 407) is amended— 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

S 886 RCS

1 (1) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ‘‘For each 

2 of fiscal years 2020 through 2029’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘For fiscal year 2020 and each fiscal year there4 after’’; 

5 (2) in subsection (c)— 

6 (A) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking ‘‘for 

7 each of fiscal years 2020 through 2034’’ and 

8 inserting ‘‘for fiscal year 2020 and each fiscal 

9 year thereafter’’; and 

10 (B) in paragraph (3)(C), by striking ‘‘for 

11 any authorized use’’ and all that follows 

12 through the period at the end and inserting 

13 ‘‘for any use authorized under paragraph (2).’’; 

14 and 

15 (3) by striking subsection (f). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS