alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### DAVID M. SHAPIRO *&*NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiffs v. EDWIN J. McMANUS and MARIA PATRICIA McMANUS, Defendants

Civil No. 311-75

Superior Court of Guam

November 17, 1975

WEEKS, *Judge*

DECISION

The case law available dealing with similar statutes upholds the right of the state to impose limited liability on the parents of a Juvenile responsible for property damage. See *Kelly v. Williams,*346 S.W.2d 434 (Texas 1961), *General Insurance Company v. Faulkner,*130 S.E.2d 645 (N.C. 1963), *Mahaney v. Hunter Enterprises Inc.,*426 P.2d 442 (Wy. 1967).

In addition to the fact that stare decisis supports the upholding of the constitutionality of Section 1716, the basic principles of statute construction and interpretation equally support this conclusion. In essence the legislature, in enacting Section 1716, is exercising its police powers in an attempt to limit or retard the growth of Juvenile Delinquency by compelling parents to exercise greater or more effective control on the actions of their children. The question then becomes whether the legislature was acting *303with respect to an appropriate public matter to which their police powers may be applied; and whether the means utilized to effect this public matter bears a reasonable relationship to such to effect the desired result. In both instances the answer would be in the affirmative. See *In Re Sorrell,*315 A.2d 110 (Md. 1974).
## 70

# ATTORNEYGRIEVANCECOMMISSIONIN

## THEOF

# MARYLANDCOURTOFAPPEALS

## OF

# MARYLANDPetitioner,Misc.

### Docket

# AGNo.

### ___v.

### SeptemberTerm,201

## TONIS.L.

# HOLCOMBRespondent.

# ORDERThismatter

### camebeforethe

### Court

### ontheJointPetition

### oftheAttorney

### Grievance

### Commissionof

### MarylandandRespondent,

### ToniS.L.

### Holcomb,todisbarthe

### Respondent

### fromthepractice

### oflaw.

### TheCourthavingconsideredthePetition,itisthis

# ___dayof2019,

### bythe

### Court

### ofAppealsofMaryland;

## ORDERED,thattheRespondent,

### ToniS.L.

### Holcomb,be,

### andsheherebyis,disbarred

### fromthepractice

### of

### lawintheState

### of

### MarylandforViolation

### ofRule8.4(a),(c)

### and(d)

### ofthe

### MarylandRules

### ofProfessional

### Conduct;

### anditisfurther

## ORDERED,thattheClerkofthis

### Courtshall

### removethe

### nameofToniS.L.

### Holcombfromtheregister

### ofattorneysinthis

### Court

### andcertifythatfacttotheTrustees

### oftheClientProtection

### Fundofthe

### Barof

### MarylandandallClerks

### ofalljudicialtribunalsinthisStateinaccordancewith

### MarylandRule19-736(d).Senior

### Judge
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-5097

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TIGE NIGEL UTLEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (CR-99-105)

Submitted: May 31, 2006 Decided: February 1, 2007

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Devon L. Donahue,

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellant. Frank D. Whitney, United States Attorney, Anne M.

Hayes, Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant United States Attorneys,

Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Tige Nigel Utley appeals the district court’s order

revoking his supervised release and sentencing him to twenty-four

months’ imprisonment. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

Utley contends that his sentence is unreasonable. We

note that while the sentence was substantially above the advisory

guideline range of eight to fourteen months, see U.S. Sentencing

Guidelines Manual § 7B1.4(a) (2000), it was within the applicable

statutory maximum of two years. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (2000).

Additionally, the court considered the permissible 18 U.S.C.A. §

3553(a) (West 2000 & Supp. 2006) factors when imposing sentence.

See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3). Further, while the district court

recognized the advisory guideline range, the court sufficiently

explained its reasons for imposing a significantly longer sentence

- Utley repeatedly violated the terms of his supervised release by

testing positive for use of controlled substances on several

occasions and by failing to undergo directed drug treatment. We

conclude that the sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised

release was not plainly unreasonable. See United States v. Crudup,

461 F.3d 433, 437 (4th Cir. 2006).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### §346a–3. Exchange of lands; construction of interchange

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to convey to the Utah State Road Commission under such terms and conditions as he may deem necessary such lands or interests in land in lot 3, section 29, township 38 south, range 12 west, Salt Lake meridian, containing approximately four and one-half acres, as are required by the Commission for the realinement and construction of United States Highway 91: Provided, That, in exchange, the State of Utah constructs an interchange of design, type, and location acceptable to the Secretary which will provide vehicular access between the said highway and Zion National Park. Such conveyed lands shall thereafter be considered as excluded from the Zion National Park and the easterly right-of-way line of United States Highway 91, identified as project numbered I–01–1(1), Washington County, Utah, shall become the westerly boundary of the Zion National Park in lot 3, section 29, township 38 south, range 12 west, Salt Lake meridian.

(Pub. L. 86–387, §3, Feb. 20, 1960, 74 Stat. 5.)
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Teleconnect Inc. (the
“Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company each hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





October
2, 2009





By:
                  /s/
      Dirk Benschop
                  
                  By:
                  /s/
      Alfonso de BorbonDirk
      Benschop, Director,
                    Chief
      Executive Officer,
                    President,
      and Treasurer
                  
                  
                  Alfonso
      de Borbon,
                    Director,
      Chief Accounting
                    and
      Financial Officer,
                    Executive
      Vice President and
                    Chief
      Operating
Officer
Order entered October 4, 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 16
- 00325
- CV JESSICA D. LEE, M.D. , Appellant

V. LOIS HUNTER, INDIVID UALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES HUNTER, DECEASED, Appellee On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 14
- 02393



### O RDER Before the Court is Lois Hunter, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of James Hunter, Deceased’s Octo ber 4, 2016 Second Unopposed Motion to Extend Appellee’s Briefing Deadline. We DENY the motion. The case will remain set for submission on October 5, 2016. We note that, because appellee has failed to file a br ief or timely request oral argument , her

co unsel will not be permitted to participate in oral argument. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 39.1.

/s/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE PRESIDING JUSTICE
#### § 31.2 Statutory authority.

The Statute establishing the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention and giving authority to make grants for juvenile justice and delinquency prevention improvement programs is the *Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974,* as amended (34 U.S.C. 11101 *et seq.*)
Travel

• Conducts outreach to travelers

• Issues travel notices

HOSPITAL

CDC

HEALTH 

DEPARTMENT

CDC PROTECTS AND PREPARES COMMUNITIES

Healthcare systems

• Develops preparedness checklists for health systems

• Provides guidance for PPE supply planning, healthcare 

system screening, and infection control 

• Leverages existing telehealth tools to redirect persons 

to the right level of care

Laboratory and 

diagnostics

• Develops diagnostic 

tests 

• Confirms all positive 

test results submitted 

by states

Schools

• Provides guidance 

for schools including 

school closures and 

online education 

options

Healthcare professionals

• Develops guidance for healthcare 

professionals

• Conducts clinical outreach and education

Businesses

• Provides business guidance 

including recommendations for 

sick leave policies and continuity 

of operations

CLINIC

CDC

SCHOOL

SCHOOL

Community members

• Shares information on symptoms 

and prevention

• Provides information on home care

• Encourages social distancing

N95

Health departments

• Assesses state and local 

readiness to implement 

community mitigation 

measures 

• Links public health 

agencies and healthcare 

systems

CDC is aggressively responding to the global outbreak of COVID-19 and community spread in the U.S.

CS 315454-A 03/18/2020

cdc.gov/COVID19
#### § 201.12 Disclaimer.

This part governs the ability to obtain review of the ODNI CLPO's determinations by the DPRC in accordance with the redress mechanism established in section 3 of the Executive order of October 7, 2022. This part is not intended to, and does not, create any other entitlement, right, or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. This part is not intended to, and does not, modify the availability or scope of any judicial review of the decisions rendered through the redress mechanism, which is governed by existing law.
### §192. Boundaries enlarged

The eastern boundary line of the Rocky Mountain National Park between the section corner common to sections 2 and 3, township 3 north, and sections 34 and 35, township 4 north, range 73 west, and the township corner common to townships 5 and 6 north, ranges 72 and 73 west, is changed so as to read as follows:

Beginning at a point on the present eastern boundary line of the Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado, which is the northwest corner of section 2 and the northeast corner of section 3, township 3 north, range 73 west of the sixth principal meridian, Colorado, running thence east along the township line to its intersection with the main hydrographic divide east of Cow Creek, between section 31, township 4 north, and section 6, township 3 north, range 72 west; thence northwesterly following along said hydrographic divide, passing over Twin Sisters, the Crags, passing west of Lily Lake, and continuing along said hydrographic divide, now between Aspen Brook and Fish Creek and passing over Lily Mountain and Giant-track Mountain to a point which is the southeast corner of section 34 and the southwest corner of section 35, township 5 north, range 73 west; thence north along the section lines between sections 34 and 35, 26 and 27, 22 and 23, 14 and 15, to the quarter corner common to sections 14 and 15, all in township 5 north, range 73 west; thence east along quarter-section line, through sections 14 and 13, township 5 north, range 73 west and along the continuation of said quarter-section line through section 18 to the quarter corner common to sections 18 and 17, township 5 north, range 72 west; thence north along the section line between sections 18 and 17, 7 and 8, 5 and 6, all in township 5 north, range 72 west, to that point which is the northeast corner of section 6 and the northwest corner of section 5 in said township and range; thence west along the township line to the township corner common to townships 5 and 6 north, ranges 72 and 73 west, which is on the present eastern boundary line of the Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado.

And the lands lying between the eastern boundary existing on February 14, 1917, and the eastern boundary as changed by this section between said section corner common to sections 2 and 3, township 3 north, and sections 34 and 35, township 4 north, range 73 west, and said township corner common to townships 5 and 6 north, ranges 72 and 73 west, are reserved and withdrawn from settlement, occupancy, or disposal under the laws of the United States, and are made a part of and included in the Rocky Mountain National Park, and all the provisions of sections 191 and 193 to 195a of this title are made applicable to and extended over the lands added to the park.

(Feb. 14, 1917, ch. 61, 39 Stat. 916.)
#### § 42.307 Obligations of recipients.

The obligation of those recipients subject to these guidelines for the maintenance of an equal employment opportunity program shall continue for the period during which the LEAA assistance is extended to a recipient or for the period during which a comprehensive law enforcement plan filed pursuant to the Safe Streets Act is in effect within the State, whichever is longer, unless the assurances of compliance, filed by a recipient in accordance with § 42.204(a)(2), specify a different period.
N O T F O RP U B L IC A T IO NIN W E S T ' S H AWA I # I RE P O R T S A N D P A C IF IC RE P O R T E R



### NO. CAAP-20-0000294

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
O F THE STATE OF HAWAI # I
LIISA BERGMANN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HAWAI # I RESIDENCY PROGRAMS, INC., Defendant-Appellant; and THE QUEEN'S MEDICAL CENTER, DANNY TAKANISHI, M.D., SUSAN STEINEMANN, M.D., and DOE ENTITIES 1-10,

Defendants-Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

(CIVIL NO. 1CC151001268)

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO DISMISS APPEAL WITH PREJUDICE (By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Leonard and Wadsworth, JJ.) Upon consideration of the Stipulation for Dismissal of Appeal With Prejudice (Stipulation), filed May 14, 2020, by Defendant-Appellant Hawai # i Residency Programs, Inc., the papers in support, and the record, it appears that (1) the appeal has been docketed; (2) the parties stipulate to dismiss the appeal with prejudice and bear their own attorneys' fees and costs; (3) the Stipulation is dated and signed by counsel for all parties appearing in the appeal; and (4) dismissal is authorized by Hawai # i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 42(b).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation is approved and the appeal is dismissed with prejudice. The parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-20-0000294 26-MAY-2020 09:32 AMN O T F O RP U B L IC A T IO NIN W E S T ' S H AWA I # I RE P O R T S A N D P A C IF IC RE P O R T E R 

### IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, May 26, 2020. /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza Chief Judge /s/ Katherine G. Leonard Associate Judge /s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge

2
CS 317702-C 07/12/2020

cdc.gov/coronavirus

HOW TO COLLECT YOUR ANTERIOR NASAL SWAB

SAMPLE FOR COVID-19 TESTING

Follow the instructions included with your sample kit. Use only materials provided in your kit to collect and store your sample, unless the kit says to do otherwise. 

Use only an approved sampling kit given to you by your healthcare provider or by personnel at the testing center. 

1. Open the sampling kit. 

3. Remove the swab 

from the container, 

being careful not to 

touch the soft end 

with your hand.

6. Gently remove 

the swab.

2. Apply hand sanitizer 

with at least 60% 

alcohol.

4. Insert the swab into 

your nostril. Do not 

insert it more than 

half an inch into 

your nostril.

7. Using the same swab, 

repeat steps 4-6 in 

your other nostril.

5. Slowly twist the 

swab, rubbing it 

along the insides 

of your nostril for 

15 seconds.

Initial set-up

Sample collection
cdc.gov/coronavirus

8. Place the swab in the 

sterile tube and snap 

off the end of the swab 

at the break line. Place 

the cap on the tube. 

13. Re-apply hand 

sanitizer.

11. Give the bag 

with the swab 

to testing 

personnel.

9. Re-apply hand 

sanitizer.

10. Place the tube 

containing the 

swab in the 

biohazard bag 

provided and seal 

the bag.

Preparation of sample for return

Returning the sample and clean-up

12. Throw away 

remaining 

sample kit items.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JANUARY 31, 1997 AND THE STATEMENTS OF INCOME
AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY 
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                       3,416,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,759,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 17,244,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            45,249,000
<PP&E>                                      20,149,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,095,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              75,328,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,405,000
<BONDS>                                     23,921,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  32,804,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                75,328,000
<SALES>                                     93,573,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            93,573,000
<CGS>                                       71,768,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               71,768,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             992,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,404,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,174,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,230,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,230,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .70
        

</TABLE>
#### § 23.2 Background.

It is recognized that certain criminal activities including but not limited to loan sharking, drug trafficking, trafficking in stolen property, gambling, extortion, smuggling, bribery, and corruption of public officials often involve some degree of regular coordination and permanent organization involving a large number of participants over a broad geographical area. The exposure of such ongoing networks of criminal activity can be aided by the pooling of information about such activities. However, because the collection and exchange of intelligence data necessary to support control of serious criminal activity may represent potential threats to the privacy of individuals to whom such data relates, policy guidelines for Federally funded projects are required.
### §281b. Acquisition of lands; restrictions; tribal-owned lands

The Secretary of the Interior may acquire by donation or with donated funds such lands, or interests therein, and other property which in his judgment will further the purpose of this subchapter and he may purchase with appropriated funds land, or interests therein, required for the administration of the Nez Perce National Historical Park. Lands or interests therein owned by a State or political subdivision of a State may be acquired under this section only by donation or exchange. In the case of sites designated as components of the Nez Perce National Historical Park after November 1, 1991, the Secretary may not acquire privately owned land or interests in land without the consent of the owner unless the Secretary finds that—

(1) the nature of land use has changed significantly or that the landowner has demonstrated intent to change the land use significantly from the condition which existed on October 30, 1992;

(2) the acquisition by the Secretary of such land or interest in land is essential to assure its use for purposes set forth in this subchapter; and

(3) such lands or interests are located—

(A) within an area depicted on Sheet 3, 4, or 5 of the map entitled "Nez Perce Additions", numbered 429–20018, and dated September 1991, or

(B) within the 8-acre parcel of Old Chief Joseph's Gravesite and Cemetery, Oregon, depicted as "Parcel A" on Sheet 2 of such map.

The Nez Perce Tribe's governing body, if it so desires, with the approval of the Secretary of the Interior, is authorized to sell, donate, or exchange tribal-owned lands held in trust needed to further the purpose of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 89–19, §3, May 15, 1965, 79 Stat. 110; Pub. L. 102–576, §2(3), Oct. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 4770.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–576 substituted provisions relating to acquisition of lands or interest therein owned by State or political subdivision of State and provisions relating to acquisition of sites designated as components of park after Nov. 1, 1991, for proviso in first sentence limiting amount of land which may be purchased in fee to 1,500 acres and amount of scenic easements which may be purchased to 1,500 acres.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 47 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 47

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed transfer to the 
     Kingdom of Saudi Arabia certain defense articles and services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2019

Mr. Menendez (for himself, Mr. Graham, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Paul, Mr. Leahy, 
  Mr. Young, and Mr. Reed) introduced the following joint resolution; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed transfer to the 
     Kingdom of Saudi Arabia certain defense articles and services.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the issuance of an export 
license with respect to the following proposed exports to the Kingdom 
of Saudi Arabia is prohibited:
            (1) The transfer of the following defense articles, 
        including services and technical data, described in Executive 
        Communication 1423 (EC-1423) submitted to Congress pursuant to 
        section 36(c) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 
        2776(c)) and published in the Congressional Record on June 3, 
        2019: The proposed export of defense articles, including data 
        and defense services, to support the performance of maintenance 
        and repair services of F110 engines to support the Ministry of 
        Defense of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
                                 <all>
```