alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.3
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 
 I, Herman de Haas, certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ITS Networks Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2004;
 
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have
 
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
 
 c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 
 5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
 
 6.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
  ****Date: August 16, 2004
By:
/s/ Herman de HaasHerman de HaasExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officerand Accounting Officer
#### In the Matter of Suffolk County Association of Municipal Employees, Inc., Petitioner, v Lamb & Barnosky, LLP, Respondent.

[823 NYS2d 677]

Proceeding to disqualify the respondent from representing the County of Suffolk in a matter currently pending before the New York State Public Employment Relations Board. Motion by the respondent to dismiss the *593proceeding on the ground that this Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the proceeding.

Ordered that the motion to dismiss the proceeding is granted; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

This Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction *(see*CPLR 7804 [b]; 506 [b]) to entertain this proceeding. Crane, J.E, Krausman, Spolzino and Skelos, JJ., concur.
```
                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned hereby makes, constitutes,

designates and appoints Dave Downing, Tim Paymal and Rick Parod as the undersigned's true

and lawful attorney-in-fact to act for and on behalf of the undersigned for and

limited to the following purposes:

a.  To execute for and on behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigned's

capacity as an officer and/or director of Lindsay Manufacturing Co., a Deleware

corporation (the "Company"), Forms 3, 4 and 5 in accordance with Section 16(a)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and

the rules thereunder;

b.  To do and perform any and all acts for and on behalf of the undersigned

which may be necessary or desirable to complete and execute any individual or

group filings under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act and timely file such

forms with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any stock

exchange or similar authority; and

c.  To take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the

foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be of benefit to,

in the best interest of, or legally required by, the undersigned, it being

understood that the documents executed by such attorney-in-fact on behalf of

the undersigned pursuant to this Power of Attorney shall be in such form and

shall contain such terms and conditions as such attorney-in-fact may approve in

such attorney-in-fact's discretion.

The undersigned hereby grants to each such attorney-in-fact full power and

authority ot do and perform any and every act and thing whatsoever requisite,

necessary, or proper to be done in the exercise of any of the rights and powers

herein granted, as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might

or could do if personally present, with full power of substitution or

revocation, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-fact shall

lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of theis Power of Attorney and the

righs and powers herein granted.  The undersigned acknowledges that the

foregoing attorneys-in-fact, in serving in such capacity at the request of the

undersigned, are not assuming, nor is the Company assuming, any of

the undersigned's responsibilities to comply with Section 16 of the

Exchange Act.

This Power of Attorney shall remain in full force and effect until the

undersigned is no longer required to make filings uner Section 16(a) of the

Exchange Act with the respect to the undersigned's holdings of the

transactions in securities issued by the Company, unless earlier revoked by

the undersigned in a signed writing delivered to the foregoing attorneys-

in-fact and the Secretary of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned has caused this Power of Attorney to be

executed as of thes 8th day of November, 2005.

Bob Snoozy

-----------

signature
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   29,371,726
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    188,446
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                      11,428,566
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     3,212,233
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              44,200,971
<COMMON>                                       365,065
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                    3,560,541
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          9,606,409
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>              13,532,015
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                        16,840,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  430,723
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>              13,398,233
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               44,200,971
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                   53,460,586
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           976,760
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  50,220,830
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  50,220,830
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                      2,262,996
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             816,874
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>               3,079,870
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     1,492,557
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,587,313
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                9,606,409
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     1,145,484
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                    1,258,810
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                       6,274,169
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.66


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 54 (Monday, March 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 15329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6575]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel, Functional Development of the 
Mammary Gland.
    Date: April 14, 2011.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Peter Zelazowski, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver 
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 
Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-6902, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6414011001164a1e0108051e0b13170f0d240a0d0c4a030b12"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3343564756411d49565f52495c4440585a735d5a5b1d545c45">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 15, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-6575 Filed 3-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13661-13662]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5590]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

United States Parole Commission


Record of Vote of Meeting Closure; (Pub. L. 94-409) (5 U.S.C. 
552b)

    I, Isaac Fulwood, of the United States Parole Commission, was 
present at a

[[Page 13662]]

meeting of said Commission, which started at approximately 10 a.m., on 
Thursday, February 17, 2011, at the U.S. Parole Commission, 5550 
Friendship Boulevard, 4th Floor, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815. The 
purpose of the meeting was to discuss an original jurisdiction case 
pursuant to 28 CFR 2.17. Four Commissioners were present, constituting 
a quorum when the vote to close the meeting was submitted.
    Public announcement further describing the subject matter of the 
meeting and certifications of the General Counsel that this meeting may 
be closed by votes of the Commissioners present were submitted to the 
Commissioners prior to the conduct of any other business. Upon motion 
duly made, seconded, and carried, the following Commissioners voted 
that the meeting be closed: Isaac Fulwood, Cranston J. Mitchell, 
Patricia Cushwa and J. Patricia Wilson Smoot.
    In witness whereof, I make this official record of the vote taken 
to close this meeting and authorize this record to be made available to 
the public.

     Dated: February 18, 2011.
Isaac Fulwood,
Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-5590 Filed 3-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-31-M
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March

31 , 2 0 15.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 15

- 00181

- CV

RODNEY TOW, TRUSTEE FOR THE ESTATE OF PE TERSON GROUP, INC. , Appellant

V.

PATEL ERVIN PLLC F/K /A PATEL & WARREN, P LLC AND HIREN PATEL , Appellee

On Appeal from the 333rd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2014

- 10771



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
This is an appeal from a judgment signed January 21, 2015. On March 25, 2015, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the a ppeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Brown, and Wise.
Motion Granted, Appeal Dismissed , and Memorandum Opinion filed August

13, 2019

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 19 -00511- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF H.M.T., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 311th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017-34839-A

MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an appeal from a final order of termination signed June 5, 2019. On July 30, 2019, appellant, A.T., filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because the trial court had granted his motion for new trial

. The order granting a new trial is attached
to his motion.
“Granting a new trial has the legal effect of vacating the original judgment and returning the case to the trial docket as though there had been no previous trial or hearing.” In re E.C. , 431 S.W.3d 812, 815–16 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2014, orig. proceeding [mand. denied]). Therefore, there is no appealable final order,2

and we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(b ).
The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Spain, and Poissant.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 14 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 14

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR EVENT TO CELEBRATE BIRTHDAY OF 
              KING KAMEHAMEHA I.

    (a) Authorization.--Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
is authorized to be used on June 9, 2019, for an event to celebrate the 
birthday of King Kamehameha I.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
event described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the 
Capitol.

            Passed the Senate April 11, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            S. CON. RES. 14

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
      for an event to celebrate the birthday of King Kamehameha I.
```
§ 415.41 Special permits. A special permit may be granted, or granted on stated conditions, provided: ( a ) There is a clear balance in favor of the public interest in terms of the following environmental criteria: ( 1 ) The importance of a facility to the community.
( 2 ) The availability of alternative locations not subject to flooding for the proposed use.
( 3 ) The compatibility of the proposed use with existing development and development anticipated in the foreseeable future.
( 4 ) The relationship of the proposed use to any applicable comprehensive plan or flood plain management program for the area.
( 5 ) The safety of access to the property in times of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles.
( 6 ) The expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise and sediment transport of the flood water expected at the site.
( 7 ) The degree to which the proposed activity would alter natural water flow or water temperature.
( 8 ) The degree to which archaeological or historic sites and structures, endangered or rare species of animals or plants, high quality wildlife habitats, scarce vegetation types, and other irreplaceable land types would be degraded or destroyed.
( 9 ) The degree to which the natural, scenic and aesthetic values at the proposed activity site could be retained.
( b ) The project shall not: ( 1 ) Endanger human life.
( 2 ) Have high flood damage potential.
( 3 ) Obstruct flood flows nor increase flood heights or velocities unduly whether acting alone or in combination with other uses.
( 4 ) Degrade significantly the water carrying capacity of any delineated floodway or channel.
( 5 ) Increase significantly the rate of local runoff, erosion, or sedimentation.
( 6 ) Degrade significantly the quality of surface water or the quality or quantity of ground water.
( 7 ) Be susceptible to flotation.
( 8 ) Have service facilities installed below the elevation of the regulatory flood without being adequately flood proofed.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 53 (Friday, March 18, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 14818]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6524]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

46 CFR Part 16


Chemical Testing

CFR Correction

    In Title 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 1 to 40, 
revised as of October 1, 2010, on page 254, in Sec.  16.105, in the 
definition of Crewmember, remove the second paragraph (1) and the 
second introductory paragraph (2).

[FR Doc. 2011-6524 Filed 3-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D. C. 20549
 FORM 10-K/A
 (AMENDMENT NO. 1)
 þ
    
    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
 
  ENERGY WEST, INCORPORATED
  Montana
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
    
    81-0141785
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 
 Title of each class
 þ o
 þ
 o þ
      - 1 -




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  EXPLANATORY NOTEPART IIITEM 9A.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURESPART IVITEM 15.  EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULESSIGNATURESEX-31    Table of Contents  
 EXPLANATORY NOTE




---



##### Table of Contents



PART II
 
 ITEM 9A.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES




---



##### Table of Contents



PART IV
 
 ITEM 15.  EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
 ExhibitNumber
    
    Description31
    
    Certifications pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238, as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
 
 SIGNATURES
  ENERGY WEST, INCORPORATEDBy:
    /s/ David A. CerotzkeDavid A. CerotzkePresident and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)By:
    /s/ Wade F. BrooksbyWade F. BrooksbyChief Financial Officer
(principal accounting officer)
### **CHAPTER 43—PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS FOR NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM AREAS**

Sec.
2301 to 2306. Omitted, Transferred, or Repealed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 12, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-30457

KENNETH DALE HOWE; GWENDOLYN SUE HOWE Plaintiff - Appellant v. JOHN E HUGHES; WARD TWO CEMETERY ASSOCIATION; POLICE JURY OF MOREHOUSE PARISH Defendants - Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:05-CV-143
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * After reviewing the record in this case and considering the briefs of the parties and arguments of counsel, we affirm the District Court’s Judgment essentially for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation of July 13, 2005 and March 28, 2006. Gwendolyn Howe alleges thatJohn Hughes accused her of“discrepancies” in cemetery board finances and of “hiring” her husband. Further, she claimsNo. 06-30457

2 Hughes stated that he would bring the matter to the attention of the district attorney. Ms. Howe claims that these statements, made in regards to her termination of employment, violated her constitutionally protected liberty interest in her reputation and the ri ght to clear her name. These state and federal due process claims fail, however, because, at thevery least, she admitted to the truth of Hughes’s statements; there were financial discrepancies and she did hire her husband, even ifonly on a volunteer basis. Codd v. Velger, 429 U.S. 624, 627-28 (1977); Rosenstein v. Dallas, 876 F.2d 392, 395-96 (5th Cir. 1 989). Her argument that Louisiana state due process law, as it relates to this claim, is broader than federal law is unavailing. State v. Smith, 614 So.2d 778, 780 (La. Ct. App. 1993). Ms. Howe’s state law defamation claim also fails because she admitted to the truth ofHughes’sstatement. Further, the public statement made by Hughes does not imply that Ms. Howe’s actions were criminal. The statement merely suggests that Hughes believed the matter warranted further investigation by the district attorney to determine w hether Ms. Howe’s actions were criminal. Therefore, Ms. Howe’s admissions need not admit to criminal conduct to admit to the truth of Hughes’s statements. Based on her admissions and without a presumption of defamation, Ms. Howe is unable to support her claim. Lastly, the district court did not abuse its discretion by declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Kenneth Howe’s state law defamation claim. That claim is not part of the same case or controversy as Ms. Howe’s underlying federal claim. AFFIRMED.