Expanding Retail Access to Private Markets

January 14, 2020

Presented by: 

John Finley, Senior Managing Director & Chief Legal Officer, Blackstone

Asset Management Advisory Committee
Expanding Retail Investor Access to Private Markets

Blackstone Is the Largest Manager in the Fast-growing Alternatives 

Industry, with Leading Platforms across All Asset Classes

2

$2.7B

3Q’19 LTM Distributable Earnings

$554B

Assets Under Management

2,800+

Employees

Note: Numbers as of September 30, 2019.

Real 

Estate

$1.3B

Private 

Equity

$0.9B

Credit

$0.3B

Hedge 

Fund 

Solutions

$0.4B

Private Equity

Corporate PE

Tactical Opportunities

Secondaries

Infrastructure

Life Sciences

Growth Equity

*Chart reflects 

LTM Segment 

Distributable Earnings

Credit

Long-Only

Performing

Distressed

Insurance

MLPs

Real Estate

Opportunistic

Debt

Core+

Hedge Fund 

Solutions

Commingled/Customized

Registered Funds

GP Stakes

Hedge Fund Seeding
Expanding Retail Investor Access to Private Markets

Characteristics of Private Market Investing vs. Public Market Investing

Public Markets Private Markets

3

 Liquid product in efficient markets

 Market-driven performance with little 

dispersion among managers

 Highly correlated to market

 Passive shareholder, except for activists 

 High pace of investor fund flows

 “Private” product in less efficient markets

 Manager-driven performance and high 

dispersion among managers

 Less-correlated returns

 Greater intervention, even ownership of 

assets

 Tends to have more patient capital
Expanding Retail Investor Access to Private Markets

Investment Returns Generally Increase with Degree of Illiquidity

Large equity(1)

4 Source: National Association of State Retirement Administrators (2017), “Issue Brief: Public Pension Plan Investment Return Assumptions.”

(1) For illustrative purposes, we include an additional investible asset class traditionally found in defined contribution plans (e.g., large equity as represented by the Russell 1000® Index).
Expanding Retail Investor Access to Private Markets

Private Capital Net IRRs

From 2008—2017, alternative asset strategies posted positive returns with substantially all 

providing an average return exceeding 10% through the period

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Median Net IRRs 

by Alternative Asset Strategy and Vintage Year

Infrastructure Natural Resources Private Debt Private Equity Real Estate

5 Source: Preqin, as of 12/31/17. (Most recent available as of 1/9/20.)
Expanding Retail Investor Access to Private Markets

8.3%

14.0%

16.1%

10.3%

S&P 500 Avg. Return PE Avg. Return S&P 500 Avg. Standard

Deviation

PE Avg. Standard

Deviation

PE Performance vs. S&P 500

(1996–2018)

PE Performance vs. S&P 500

Private Equity has higher returns and lower volatility than Public Markets over past two decades

6 Source: Cambridge Associates – Private Investment Benchmarks Q2 2019 Final Report. 

Note: Standard Deviation is calculated quarterly due to data availability.
Expanding Retail Investor Access to Private Markets

7

Illiquid or Alternative Assets Reduce Risk for a Given Level of Return

Source: National Association of State Retirement Administrators, “NASRA Issue Brief: Public Pension Plan Investment Return Assumptions,” 2015, updated February 2017, 

http://www.nasra.org/files/Issue%20Briefs/NASRAInvReturnAssumptBrief.pdf.
Expanding Retail Investor Access to Private Markets

Global Alternative AUM Growth 

Global AUM forecasted to increase to $14.0T in 2023, with PE overtaking Hedge Funds in assets

1.4 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.6 3.1

4.9

0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6

0.7

1.4

0.9 1.1 1.3 1.6

2.3

2.7 3.0 3.1 3.2

3.6

4.7

0.4 0.4

0.4

0.6

0.6

0.7

0.7 0.8 0.8

0.8

1.2

0.4

1.0

0.8

$3.1 $3.5 $4.1 $4.6

$5.6

$6.5 $6.9 $7.4 $7.8

$8.8

$14.0

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2023F

Private Equity

Private Debt

Hedge Funds

Real Estate

Infrastructure

Natural

Resources

10.5% CAGR

8

Alternative AUM by Asset Class

($ in trillions) 

Source: Preqin, “The Future of Alternatives Report,” October 2018. 
Expanding Retail Investor Access to Private Markets

9

Private Markets Growing in Relation to Public Markets

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

$0

$5

$10

$15

$20

$25

2000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018

1Q'2019

Value ($ in Trillions)

Private Capital Assets as Percentage of MSCI US Market Capitalization

Private Capital AUM Public Market Capitalization Private AUM as % of Public Market

Private AUM % of Public Markets

(Post-GFC Average, 2011–1Q’2019) 

27%

Private AUM % of Public Markets

(Pre-GFC Average, 2000–2007) 

12%

Source: Blackstone calculations of Preqin and Bloomberg data, as of March 31, 2019. Private Capital AUM is represented by the total assets under management of private equity, real estate,

private debt, infrastructure and natural resources strategies, as measured by Preqin. U.S. Public Market Cap represented by the MSCI U.S. Equity Index. 
Expanding Retail Investor Access to Private Markets

$30 

$23 

$15 

$84 

10

Global Retail Investor Base and Demand

Large global retail investor base with growing demand for private market investments

Retail Demand for Alternatives(2)

(2019 vs. 2021E)

 Retail investors represent ~$68T market, with mass 

affluent investors making up 20% (~$30T) (1)

 Includes HNW individuals, family offices, multi-family 

officers and other mass affluent investors

Mass Affluent ($1–5M)

20%

UHNW (>$30M)

15%

HNW ($5–30M)

10%

Institutional 

(Pensions, Insurance 

Companies, SWFs)

55%

Global Retail Investor Universe(1)

($ in trillions)

-20%

-10%

0%

10%

20%

ETFs Alternatives Fixed

Income

Variable

Annuities

Money

Markets

Mutual

Funds

(1) CapGemini, Oliver Wyman, PWC, as of 2019. Retail measured across global households with financial assets >$1 million.

(2) Advisor reported anticipated product mix. ‘Alternatives’ excludes demand for liquid alternatives. Cerulli U.S. Intermediary Distribution 2019. 
Expanding Retail Investor Access to Private Markets

28%

52%

5%

Pensions Endowments Individual

Investors

Average Allocation to Alternatives

Global Individual Wealth 

Global individual investable wealth is growing, however, remains under-allocated to Alternatives

2018 2025

Global Individual Investable Assets

$70T

$106T

11 Sources: For investable assets, 2018 CapGemini World Wealth Report. For allocations: Willis Towers Watson, “Global Pension Assets Study,” 2018; NACUBO, “Commonfund Study of Endowments,” 

2017; Money Management Institute, “Retail Distribution of Alternative Investments,” 2017. Averages provided are dollar-weighted. Allocations shown are for U.S. Pensions and U.S. University 

Endowments.
Expanding Retail Investor Access to Private Markets

The SEC’s Focus on Retail Investor Access to Private Companies 

 As of April 2018 there were 103 privately held 

U.S. start-ups with valuations of over $1 billion 

and a total value of $385 billion

 Less access to private companies means retail 

investors are missing out on the opportunity 

for excess or uncorrelated returns

“When retail investors participate in our markets, how broad a spectrum of investments do

they have? I think that spectrum has been getting relatively smaller. Because we have fewer

public companies, companies are waiting much longer in their life cycle to go public, which

by definition means that retail investors have less access to the market as a whole. And I

fear, less access to companies that are well-established, but still growing.”

– Jay Clayton, Chairman of the SEC

12 Source: Dow Jones Venture Source and the Wall Street Journal, https://www.wsj.com/graphics/billion-dollar-club/, as of April 2018.
Expanding Retail Investor Access to Private Markets

U.S. Listed Companies and Market Capitalization

Number of Listed Companies decreased -39% in past 25 years, while Market Cap increased by 492%

13

$0

$5

$10

$15

$20

$25

$30

$35

3,500

4,500

5,500

6,500

7,500

8,500

1994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018

Market Cap ($ in Trillions)

No. of Listed Firms

Aggregate Mkt Cap Number of Listed Firms

Source: World Bank, as of December 31, 2018. Market capitalization and number of listed companies are for listed domestic companies. Listed domestic companies, including foreign companies which are exclusively listed, 

are those which have shares listed on an exchange at the end of the year. Investment funds, unit trusts, and companies whose only business goal is to hold shares of other listed companies, such as holding companies and 

investment companies, regardless of their legal status, are excluded. A company with several classes of shares is counted once. Only companies admitted to listing on the exchange are included.
Expanding Retail Investor Access to Private Markets

The Shrinking of U.S. Public Markets – Why Is it Happening

 While regulatory burdens (e.g., Sarbanes Oxley) is often identified as a factor, this is belied by the 

fact that the adverse trend for IPOs predated Sarbanes-Oxley

 Domination of public markets by institutional investors reduces interest in small and micro-cap firms

 Legislative and SEC loosening of regulation on the private market facilitated equity and debt 

funding by private companies

 Private companies can now obtain ample later stage venture capital funding

• Venture capital raising funds at historic level (e.g., SoftBank)

• Corporate venture capital

• PE firms also involved in late stage investing of private companies

• More mutual funds participating in late stage venture (e.g., Fidelity Contra fund and T. Rowe 

Price) 

 Increasing liquidity in private markets only makes private markets more accessible

 Prioritization by emerging companies and founders of control and flexibility discourages IPOs

14
Expanding Retail Investor Access to Private Markets

The Shrinking of U.S. Public Markets – Implications

 Pre-IPO market has become the IPO market of the past 

 Private companies going public later has reduced opportunity for out-sized gains by post-IPOs 

companies

• Amazon IPO three years after founding (565x IPO price)

• Google IPO six years after founding (20x IPO price)

• Facebook IPO eight years after founding (3x IPO price)

 Given nature of current mix of public companies, investors need early stage venture, late stage 

venture and PE to get ideal diversification and superior returns

15
Expanding Retail Investor Access to Private Markets

16

Blackstone Private Equity Assets Under Management by Sector

Private wealth now accounts for ~8% of Blackstone’s total corporate private equity capital raised 

Pensions / 

Endowments/

Foundations

47%

Sovereign Wealth 

Funds

22%

Financial 

Institutions

13%

Private 

Wealth

8%

Other

10%

Source: Blackstone, as of September 30, 2019. Note: Includes capital commitments from BCP Funds VI, VII and VIII only. Excludes coinvests. 
Expanding Retail Investor Access to Private Markets

 High & ultra high net worth

 $1–$5mm+ investable assets

 Advisors are largely self-employed 

and can get minimal institutional 

support (e.g., custody, technology) 

from clearing firms

 Typical products include drawdown 

funds and mutual funds

 Clients primarily invest through feeder 

funds for drawdown funds and directly 

for liquid products

 Advisor compensation tends to be in 

the form of fees based on AUM – not 

commissions generated from product 

sales 

 Influence of product selection is low, 

as each RIA chooses his/her own 

investments 

17

U.S. Intermediary Distribution Channels

Blackstone Private Wealth Solutions has strong relationships with global banks / wire houses 

as well as independent wealth managers across RIAs and IBD firms

Global Banks / 

Wire Houses(1)

Registered Investment 

Advisors Independent Broker Dealers

 High & ultra high net worth

 $1–$30mm+ investable assets

 Advisors are employees of bank 

sponsor

 Typical products include hedge funds, 

drawdown funds and mutual funds

 Clients primarily invest through feeder 

funds for drawdown funds and directly 

for liquid products

 General concentration of assets 

around major cities where advisors 

work in large branches

 House driven research and investment 

recommendations influence portfolio 

decisions

 Primarily mass affluent

 $100k–1mm investable assets

 Advisors are largely independent 

contractors but get institutional 

support (e.g., centralized compliance, 

custody, technology) from IWM

 Typical products include BDCs, nontraded REITs, ETFs and mutual funds

 Clients invest directly

 Little use of proprietary products

 Advisors are typically compensated on 

commissions

 Product selection of the firm plays a 

role in advisor investment decisions

(1) Private banks are an additional, but smaller, distribution channel that targets a similar investor group to wire houses.
Expanding Retail Investor Access to Private Markets

Blackstone Product Development

Focus on delivering institutional capabilities in innovative retail-oriented structures

High Net Worth Investor Priorities:

ü Fully drawn capital upfront

ü Perpetual offering with periodic liquidity

ü 1099 tax reporting

ü Income-oriented investments

ü “One-stop” multi-asset solutions

Guiding Principles of BX Product Development:

üInstitutional quality performance

üPerpetual capital structure

üTailored client experience

üTransparency

Potential Challenges and Considerations:

üInvestment / portfolio flexibility within retail structure

üTax diversification requirements to ensure favorable tax 

treatment for underlying investors

üInability to be compensated based on performance limits 

available strategies that may be offered

üAffiliated transaction rules and exceptions not designed 

for equity investing

18 Note: The above summary is for discussion purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to purchase any interest in any Blackstone investment vehicle or strategy. 

(1) Certain unregistered drawdown products are accessed by retail investors through feeder funds.

(2) GSO sub-advised.

(3) “Professional Investor” is a very detailed definition, but the takeaway is that it is an even higher hurdle than the U.S. Qualified Purchaser/Accredited Investor standard.

Retail Structure Fund(s) Strategy Investor Type

Real 

Estate

Non-Traded REIT BREIT Core and Core+ NASAA Suitable 

Investors

’40 Act Tender BREIF RE Debt Qualified

Clients

Listed REIT BXMT RE Debt All

Credit 

Private BDC BGSL U.S. Direct 

Lending

Accredited

Investors

’40 Act Interval BGFREI Liquid Credit All

Listed CEFs and 

ETFs

BGB, BGX, BSL, 

SRLN (ETF)(1) Liquid Credit All

UK Listed ClosedEnd Funds BGLF, CIFU Liquid Credit Professional 

Investors(2)

Hedge

Funds

’40 Act Mutual BXMIX L/S Equity All

’40 Act Tender BAAF L/S Equity Accredited 

Investors

UCITS BXDMS L/S Equity All

Registered Funds Designed for Retail Investors(1)
Expanding Retail Investor Access to Private Markets

BREIT Overview (1)(2)

19

Bringing institutional real estate to individual investors

Pre-Launch

(3 weeks prior)

(1) Since inception through Sep’19. Annual, perpetual fundraise pace based on estimated 2020 distribution partner schedules.

(2) Market share source: Stanger Market Pulse. Market share based on most recent three months ended Nov ’19.

Blackstone Non-Traded REIT AUM Raised

ü$10.6B AUM raised since Jan 2017 Launch

ü69% market share

ü60,000 individual investors

ü$10B+ annual, perpetual fundraise pace

$742M

$933M

$1.4B

$10.6B

1H 2017 2H 2017 1H 2018 Since 

Inception
Expanding Retail Investor Access to Private Markets

Invested heavily to build powerful platform advantage

Solutions

Provider

Education

Leader

Expansive

Analytics

Unmatched

Scale

üBlackstone University

üInvesting insights

üScalable digital platform

ü130 employees globally

üChannelized sales

üDedicated service platform

üProprietary system

ü250K+ advisor profiles

üOpportunity ranking model

üInstitutional quality performance

üBespoke product offerings

üDiversified alternatives

Blackstone’s Platform for Retail

20
Expanding Retail Investor Access to Private Markets

Democratizing Access to Private Markets – Proposed Regulatory Changes 

Commenters on the SEC’s concept release argued in favor of the following regulatory changes that would help expand 

retail investor access to private markets: 

 Eliminate Accredited Investor Threshold for Offering of Regulated Funds of Private Funds 

• Currently, the SEC staff requires that offerings of registered closed-end funds that invest more than 

15% of their assets in private funds be limited to Accredited Investors

– A number of commenters encouraged the SEC staff to change its policy imposing the 15% limitation(1) 

 Ease Liquidity Restraints for Target Date Funds 

• A registered open-end fund may not invest more than 15% of its net assets in illiquid securities, which limits 

the extent to which a mutual fund may invest in private companies and private funds

– Several commenters recommended that the SEC ease liquidity constraints for target date funds with longer 

investment horizons, to provide greater flexibility to invest in illiquid assets, including private funds(2) 

 Allow Carry-like Compensation for Retail Funds

• Section 205(a)(1) of the Advisers Act prohibits registered investment advisers to a registered fund (other than 

a BDC) from receiving compensation on the basis of capital gains or capital appreciation unless the fund is 

limited to Qualified Clients. 

– Several commenters suggested that the SEC expand the definition of Qualified Client to help facilitate the 

offering of regulated funds that make direct investments in private companies(3)

21

(1) See, e.g., Letter from American Investment Council dated September 24, 2019; (“AIC Letter”); Letter from The Investment Adviser Association dated October 18, 2019; Letter from Federal Regulation of Securities 

Committee of the Business Law Section of the American Bar Association dated October 16, 2019 (“ABA Letter”); Letter from Institutional Limited Partners Association dated September 24, 2019 (“ILPA Letter”); Letter 

from Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP dated September 24, 2019 (“Simpson Letter”); Letter from Ropes & Gray LLP dated September 24, 2019 (“Ropes Letter”); Letter from Dechert LLP dated September 24, 2019 

(“Dechert Letter”). 

(2) See, e.g., AIC Letter; ABA Letter; Ropes Letter. 

(3) See, e.g., AIC Letter; Simpson Letter; Dechert Letter. 
Expanding Retail Investor Access to Private Markets

 The intended long-term holding period of target date funds makes them particularly well suited to 

serve as the vehicle through which retail investors access private companies and private equity 

funds

 A target date fund is a mutual fund or other investment vehicle (i.e., a CIT) that holds a diversified 

portfolio of equity and fixed income investments that automatically rebalances over time 

• As the fund’s target retirement date approaches, the fund shifts from a capital appreciation 

strategy to an income producing strategy 

 The SEC could ease liquidity constraints for target date funds with longer investment horizons to 

provide greater flexibility to invest in illiquid assets, including private equity funds

• Such flexibility would be subject to Board oversight and an appropriate liquidity risk management 

program 

 This proposed change would have the benefit of ensuring that private markets make up an 

appropriate portion (e.g., 25%) of an investor’s complete investment program 

Democratizing Access to Private Markets – Target Date Funds

“We believe that there is no reason that retail investors should not also be able to access the

private markets...The Commission should permit target date open-end funds to have a

greater concentration of illiquid investments, including private equity funds...We believe

that these changes would allow greater retail access to private company returns in

retirement accounts.”

– Steve Nelson, CEO, Institutional Limited Partners Association (ILPA)

22
Expanding Retail Investor Access to Private Markets

Mitigating Risks for Retail Investors 

Commenters on the concept release also underscored the following ways to expand access to private markets while 

mitigating risks for retail investors: 

 Embrace Regulated Funds(1) 

• The legal structure of a regulated fund provides core investor protections

– A regulated fund is managed by a registered investment adviser who owes a fiduciary duty to the fund, 

subject to the oversight of a majority independent board and distributed by intermediaries who must act 

in the best interest of investors

• Holding an interest in a diversified portfolio reduces risk relative to individual investments

– A regulated fund holds a diversified portfolio designed to reduce the risk that losses at any single underlying 

company will outweigh successful investments

– The adviser to a regulated fund has substantial resources and sophistication to review and diligence 

investments on behalf of the fund’s investors

 Provide Access to Experienced Managers(2) 

• The SEC could enhance retail investors protection by requiring managers to meet “scale and experience” 

criteria

• The SEC should also consider limiting retail access to managers with an institutional investor base to help 

ensure that investors are exposed to experienced private markets managers only

– For example, the SEC could require that regulated funds of private funds only invest in private funds that 

accept more than a certain percentage (e.g., 50%) of their capital commitments from institutional investors

• Retail investors benefit when the manager of a regulated fund has a strong institutional investor base

– Institutional investors negotiate favorable terms for their investments 

– Provides an opportunity for retail investors to achieve incentive alignment with institutional investors 

23 (1) See, e.g., Letter from Committee on Capital Markets Regulation dated September 19, 2019 (“CCMR Letter”); AIC Letter; ILPA Letter. 

(2) See e.g., CCMR Letter; AIC Letter; ABA Letter. 
Expanding Retail Investor Access to Private Markets

Speaker Biography

24

John G. Finley, a Senior Managing Director, is Blackstone’s Chief Legal Officer.

Before joining Blackstone, Mr. Finley had been a partner with Simpson Thacher & 

Bartlett for 22 years where he was most recently a member of that law firm's 

Executive Committee and Co-Head of Global M&A. 

Mr. Finley is an Adviser on the American Law Institute’s Restatement of the Law, 

Corporate Governance Project and a member of the Dean’s Advisory Board of 

Harvard Law School, the Board of Advisors of the Penn Institute for Law and 

Economics and the Advisory Board of the Penn Netter Center for Community 

Partnerships. He has served on the Board of Advisors of the Knight-Bagehot 

Fellowship in Economics and Business Journalism at Columbia University, the Lawyers 

Committee for Human Rights and the Jewish Board of Family and Children Services. 

He has also served as Chairman of the Annual International Mergers & Acquisitions 

Conference of the International Bar Association and on the Committee of Securities 

Regulation of the New York State Bar Association. 

Mr. Finley has a BS in Economics, summa cum laude, from the Wharton School of the 

University of Pennsylvania (1978), a BA in History, summa cum laude, from the 

College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Pennsylvania (1978), and a JD, cum 

laude, from Harvard Law School (1981). 
Expanding Retail Investor Access to Private Markets

Important Disclosures

25

Opinions expressed reflect the current opinions of the Speaker, and not necessarily those of The Blackstone Group, Inc. or its affiliates (collectively, “Blackstone”), as of the date appearing herein and

are based on the Speaker’s opinions of the current market and regulatory environment, which is subject to change. Certain information contained herein discusses general market activity, industry or

sector trends, or other broad-based economic, market or political conditions and should not be construed as research or investment advice. Blackstone undertakes no responsibility to advise you of

any changes in the views expressed herein.

This document may not be relied on in any manner as legal, tax, investment, accounting or other advice or as an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any security or instrument in or to

participate in any account, program, trading strategy with any fund, account or other investment vehicle (each a “Fund”) managed or advised by Blackstone or any of its affiliates, nor shall it or the fact of

its distribution form the basis of, or be relied on in connection with, any contract or investment decision. If such offer is made, it will only be made by means of an offering memorandum or operative

documents (collectively with additional offering documents, the “Offering Documents”), which would contain material information (including certain risks of investing in such Fund) not contained in

other materials provided and which would supersede and qualify in its entirety the information set forth in such materials. Neither the Speaker, nor Blackstone, its respective Funds, nor any of its

respective affiliates make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein and nothing contained herein should be relied upon

as a promise or representation as to past or future performance of a Fund or any other entity, transaction, or investment.

ERISA Fiduciary Disclosure. The foregoing information has not been provided in a fiduciary capacity under ERISA, and it is not intended to be, and should not be considered as, impartial investment

advice.

Third Party Information. Certain information contained herein has been obtained from sources outside Blackstone, which in certain cases have not been updated through the date hereof. While such

information is believed to be reliable for purposes used herein, no representations are made as to the accuracy or completeness thereof and none of Blackstone, its Funds, nor any of its affiliates takes

any responsibility for, and has not independently verified, any such information.

Blackstone Proprietary Data. Certain information and data provided herein is based on Blackstone’s proprietary knowledge and data. Portfolio companies may provide proprietary market data to

Blackstone, including about local market supply and demand conditions, current market rents and operating expenses, capital expenditures, and valuations for multiple assets. Such proprietary market

data is used by Blackstone to evaluate market trends as well as to underwrite potential and existing investments. While Blackstone currently believes that such information is reliable for purposes used

herein, it is subject to change, and reflects Blackstone’s opinions as to whether the amount, nature and quality of the data is sufficient for the applicable conclusion, and no representations are made as

to the accuracy or completeness thereof.

Forward-Looking Statements. Certain information contained in the herein constitutes “forward-looking statements,” which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology or the negatives

thereof. These may include financial projections and estimates and their underlying assumptions, statements about plans, objectives and expectations with respect to future operations, and statements

regarding future performance. Such forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain and there are or may be important factors that could cause actual outcomes or results to differ materially from

those indicated in such statements. Blackstone undertake no obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or

otherwise.

Trends. There can be no assurances that any of the trends described herein will continue or will not reverse. Past events and trends do not imply, predict or guarantee, and are not necessarily indicative

of, future events or results.

Past Performance. In considering any investment performance information contained in this document, bear in mind that past or projected performance is not necessarily indicative of future results

and there can be no assurance that a Fund will achieve comparable results, implement its investment strategy, achieve its objectives or avoid substantial losses or that any expected returns will be

met.