west virginia department of environmental protection

Appendix G

Jefferson County, OH 

Emissions Inventory Summary

Promoting a healthy environment.

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page G - 1
[This page intentionally left blank.]

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page G - 2
1

Crowder, Laura M

From: Crowder, Laura M

Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 5:16 PM

To: William Durham (William.F.Durham@wv.gov)

Cc: Laura Mae Crowder (Laura.M.Crowder@wv.gov)

Subject: FW: Weirton PM 2.5 SIP Inventory Data

Attachments: Steuby_1-5-2012.xlsx

Fred,

Here is the Jefferson County Ohio inventory data from Jennifer.

Laura

From: Dines, Jennifer [mailto:Jennifer.Dines@epa.state.oh.us] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 10:44 AM 

To: Crowder, Laura M 

Cc: Durham, William F 

Subject: RE: Weirton PM 2.5 SIP Inventory Data 

I’ve crunched numbers...attached is what I plan to use.  See the tab marked 2025.  Yellow highlighted cells are what I

changed based on your latest update. I went with your nonroad....but the other areas for Jefferson I went back to my

original numbers and extrapolated etc. so they vary a little.   I only edited those main tables...summary tables haven’t

been looked at and reworked so ignore any data in those.

Plowing ahead!!!!!!!

Thanks!!!

Jennifer Dines

Manager, State Implementation Plan and Rulemaking Section

Division of Air Pollution Control

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency

Wk (614) 644‐3696

Fax (614) 644‐3681

. 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page G - 3
[This page intentionally left blank.]

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page G - 4
Jefferson

Sector 2005 Base 2008 

Attainment

2015 

Interim

2025 

Maintenance Safety Margin

EGU Point 1,307.90 1,372.80 1,405.39 1,449.64 -76.84

Non-EGU 461.57 461.42 437.63 413.69 47.73

Non-road 24.30 22.50 17.15 11.25 11.25

Area 110.12 110.6 108.49 105.97 4.63

MAR 8.07 7.25 4.5 0.68 6.57

On-road 73.17 60.97 31.88 16.49 44.48

TOTAL 1,985.13 2,035.54 2,005.04 1,997.72 37.82

Mobile contrib 3.685905 2.99527398 1.5899932 0.825441003

Hancock, WV

Sector 2005 Base 2008 

Attainment

2015 

Interim

2025 

Maintenance Safety Margin

EGU Point 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Non-EGU 182.02 90.97 83.84 74.81 16.16

Non-road 9.61 8.20 5.57 3.10 5.10

Area 313.70 232.96 230.26 229.92 3.04

MAR 26.18 18.46 18.58 18.75 -0.28

On-road 18.63 13.51 6.53 4.10 9.41

TOTAL 550.14 364.10 344.78 330.68 33.42

Brooke, WV

Sector 2005 Base 2008 

Attainment

2015 

Interim

2025 

Maintenance Safety Margin

EGU Point 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Non-EGU 155.12 166.68 155.84 141.59 25.08

Non-road 11.04 9.46 6.47 3.76 5.69

Area 208.48 219.93 217.55 216.00 3.93

MAR 17.07 3.85 3.87 3.91 -0.06

On-road 19.41 14.42 6.97 4.34 10.08

TOTAL 411.13 414.33 390.70 369.61 44.73

111.21 88.90 45.38 24.93

PM2.5 2005 Base 2008 

Attainment

2015 

Interim

2022 

Maintenance

Safety Margin

Jefferson 1,985.13 2,035.54 2,005.04 1,997.72 37.82

Hancock, WV 550.14 364.10 344.78 330.68 33.42

Brooke, WV 411.13 414.33 390.70 369.61 44.73

COMBINED PM2.5 

TOTAL 2,946.40 2,813.97 2,740.52 2,698.01 115.97

Mobile contrib 3.774442 3.15923393 1.6558886 0.924015792

on road 111.21 88.90 45.38 24.93

non road 44.95 40.16

EGU 1,307.90 1,372.80

NonRoad ‐ WV ran the NONROAD Model for Brooke, Hancock and Jefferson Counties for

2005, 2008, 2015 and 2025

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page G - 5
Jefferson

Sector 2005 Base 2008 Attainment 2015 

Interim

2025 

Maintenance

Safety 

Margin

EGU 225,594.94 135,506.74 72,203.22 45,073.14 90,433.60

NonEGU 849.92 782.87 757.91 692.85 90.02

Nonroad 17.31 3.09 0.40 0.45 2.64

Area Sources 110.89 109.15 101.75 91.69 17.46

Maritime/Air/Rail 26.16 21.61 13.04 0.48 21.13

Onroad 18.18 5.65 3.93 3.56 2.09

TOTAL 226,617.40 136,429.11 73,080.25 45,862.17 90,566.94

Mobile contrib 0.008022332 0.004141345 0.0053776 0.007762389

Hancock, WV

Sector 2005 Base 2008 Attainment 2015 

Interim

2025 

Maintenance

Safety 

Margin

EGU 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

NonEGU 1,480.85 613.04 572.55 519.57 93.47

Nonroad 9.72 1.73 0.21 0.23 1.50

Area Sources 728.92 248.63 237.35 221.22 27.41

Maritime/Air/Rail 32.27 31.47 31.67 31.96 -0.48

Onroad 6.58 1.92 1.36 1.10 0.82

TOTAL 2,258.35 896.80 843.14 774.09 122.71

Brooke, WV

Sector 2005 Base 2008 Attainment 2015 

Interim

2025 

Maintenance

Safety 

Margin

EGU 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

NonEGU 620.55 766.54 718.43 654.91 111.63

Nonroad 12.13 2.17 0.27 0.30 1.87

Area Sources 167.98 163.76 156.62 146.42 17.33

Maritime/Air/Rail 20.32 6.34 6.38 6.44 -0.10

Onroad 7.01 2.11 1.51 1.26 0.85

TOTAL 827.98 940.92 883.21 809.34 131.58

31.77 9.68 6.80 5.92

SO2 2005 Base 2008 Attainment 2015 

Interim

2022 

Maintenance

Safety 

Margin

Jefferson 226,617.40 136,429.11 73,080.25 45,862.17 90,566.94

Hancock, WV 2,258.35 896.80 843.14 774.09 122.71

Brooke, WV 827.98 940.92 883.21 809.34 131.58

COMBINED SO2 

TOTAL 229,703.73 138,266.82 74,806.60 47,445.59 90,821.23

Mobile SO2 contrib 0.013830859 0.007000956 0.0090901 0.01247745

on road 31.77 9.68 6.80 5.92

non road 39.16 6.99

EGU 225,594.94 135,506.74

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page G - 6
Jefferson

Sector 2005 Base 2008 

Attainment 2015 Interim 2025 Maintenance Safety Margin

EGU 41,046.61 35,486.86 19,488.27 12,631.73 22,855.13

NonEGU 1,991.85 1,991.96 1,938.71                 1,863.75 128.21

Nonroad 234.30                       207.68         131.49                       96.59 111.09

Area Sources 251.38 253.45 252.46                     251.93 1.52

Maritime/Air/Rail 317.3 300.96 202.51                       70.94 230.02

Onroad 2,105.85                1,758.04         870.17 322.71 1,435.33

TOTAL 45,947.29 39,998.95 22,883.61 15,237.65 24,761.30

Mobile contrib 4.58318652 4.395215374 3.80259059 2.117846256

Hancock, WV

Sector 2005 Base 2008 

Attainment 2015 Interim 2025 Maintenance Safety Margin

EGU 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

NonEGU 1,181.15 574.68 524.80 462.67 112.01

Nonroad 135.47 119.41 74.58 51.49 67.92

Area Sources 1,446.78 158.02 156.60 154.58 3.43

Maritime/Air/Rail 695.36 534.89 538.26 543.08 -8.18

Onroad 482.75 360.25 149.00 52.09 308.16

TOTAL 3,941.51 1,747.25 1,443.24 1,263.91 483.34

Brooke, WV

Sector 2005 Base 2008 

Attainment 2015 Interim 2025 Maintenance Safety Margin

EGU 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

NonEGU 692.76 789.79 742.21 679.29 110.50

Nonroad 204.75 169.37 88.18 59.17 110.20

Area Sources 311.36 119.10 117.87 116.12 2.99

Maritime/Air/Rail 444.99 112.83 113.54 114.56 -1.73

Onroad 540.40 412.02 174.71 62.47 349.55

TOTAL 2,194.25 1,603.12 1,236.53 1,031.61 571.51

3,129.00 2,530.31 1,193.88 437.27

NOx 2005 Base 2008 

Attainment 2015 Interim 2022 Maintenance Safety Margin

Jefferson 45,947.29 39,998.95 22,883.61 15,237.65 24,761.30

Hancock, WV 3,941.51 1,747.25 1,443.24 1,263.91 483.34

Brooke, WV 2,194.25 1,603.12 1,236.53 1,031.61 571.51

COMBINED NOx 

TOTAL 52,083.05 43,349.32 25,563.37 17,533.17 25,816.15

Mobile contrib 6.00771249 5.837023961 4.67027536 2.493958443

on road 3,129.00 2,530.31 1,193.88 437.27

non road 574.51 496.47

EGU 41,046.61 35,486.86

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page G - 7
west virginia department of environmental protection

Appendix H

Redesignation Request and

Maintenance Plan 

for the Ohio Portion of the

Steubenville-Weirton OH-WV

24-Hour PM2.5 Nonattainment

Area

Jefferson County, Ohio

Promoting a healthy environment.

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 1
[This page intentionally left blank.]

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 2
TH

REDE

M

T

E STE

N

Ohio

D

ESIGN

MAINT

THE O

EUBE

2

NONA

Jeff

o Enviro

Divisio

NATIO

TENAN

OHIO 

ENVIL

24-HO

ATTAI

ferson

Prep

onmen

n of Air

Ma

ON RE

NCE P

POR

LLE-W

OUR P

NMEN

Count

pared b

ntal Pro

r Pollut

ay 2012

EQUE

PLAN 

RTION

WEIRT

PM2.5

NT AR

ty, Oh

by: 

otection

tion Co

2

EST A

FOR 

N OF 

TON O

REA 

io 

n Agen

ontrol 

AND 

OH-WV

cy 

 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 3
 

This page left intentionally blank

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 4
 i 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

Chapter One 

Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 

Geographical description and background ................................................................................... 2 

Status of air quality ....................................................................................................................... 3 

Chapter Two 

Requirements for redesignation .................................................................................................... 4 

Chapter Three 

PM2.5 monitoring .......................................................................................................................... 10 

24-Hour PM2.5 NAAQS ................................................................................................................ 10 

Ambient data quality assured ...................................................................................................... 11 

Three complete years of data ..................................................................................................... 11 

Commitment to continue monitoring ........................................................................................... 17 

Chapter Four 

Emission inventory ...................................................................................................................... 18 

Base year inventory .................................................................................................................... 18 

Emission projections ................................................................................................................... 19 

Demonstration of maintenance ................................................................................................... 27 

Permanent and enforceable emissions reductions ..................................................................... 37 

Provisions for future update ........................................................................................................ 38 

Chapter Five 

Control measures and regulations .............................................................................................. 39 

Nonattainment areas to implement RACM and RACT ................................................................ 39 

Show Reasonable Further Progress (RFP) ................................................................................ 41 

Emission inventories ................................................................................................................... 41 

Implementation of past SIP revisions .......................................................................................... 42 

New source review provisions ................................................................................................... 44 

Assurance of continued controls ................................................................................................. 45 

Chapter Six 

Contingency measures ............................................................................................................... 46 

Commitment to revise plan ......................................................................................................... 46 

Commitment for contingency measures ..................................................................................... 47 

Potential contingency measures ................................................................................................. 47 

List of PM2.5, SO2, and NOx sources ........................................................................................... 48 

Chapter Seven 

Public participation ...................................................................................................................... 49 

Chapter Eight 

Conclusions ................................................................................................................................ 50 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 5
 ii 

FIGURES 

Figure 1 Steubenville- Weirton 24-Hour PM 2.5 Exceedances......................................9 

Figure 2 Map of the Steubenville-Weirton, OH-WV, nonattainment area and monitor 

locations .............................................................................................................. 11 

Figure 3 Ohio 24-Hour PM 2.5: Design Values 1999-2001 Through 2008-2010 ................ 15 

Figure 4 West Virginia 24-Hour PM 2.5 Design Values 1999-2001 Through 2008-2010 .... 16 

Figure 5 PM 2.5 24- Hour Mean National Trends ................................................................ 16 

TABLES

Table 1 Monitoring Data for Steubenville-Weirton, OH-WV area for 2008 – 2010 ........... 13 

Table 2 98th Percentile and Design Value Before and After Imputation .......................... 14 

Table 3 Jefferson County, Ohio Emission Estimations for On-road Mobile Sources ....... 25 

Table 4 Summary of Ohio Emissions Estimations for On-road Mobile Sources .............. 25 

Table 5 Brooke County, West Virginia Emission Estimations for On-road Mobile 

 Sources ............................................................................................................... 25 

Table 6 Hancock County, West Virginia Emission Estimations for On-road Mobile 

Sources ............................................................................................................... 25 

Table 7 Summary of West Virginia Emission Estimations for On-Road Mobile Sources . 26 

Table 8 Emission Estimations Totals for On-road Mobile Sources for the SteubenvilleWeirton Area ....................................................................................................... 26 

Table 9 Percent of Mobile Emissions for the Steubenville-Weirton Area in 2015 

 and 2025 .... ........................................................................................................ 26 

Table 10 Reductions in SO2 and NOx EGU Emissions Between 2008 and 2009. ............. 29 

Table 11 Reductions in SO2 and NOx EGU Emissions Between the First Half of 2008 

 and 2010.... ......................................................................................................... 30 

Table 12 Jefferson County, Ohio PM2.5 Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year 2005, 

Estimated 2008, and Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – Without CAIR. ............... 32 

Table 13 Brooke County, West Virginia PM2.5 Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year 

2005, Estimated 2008, and Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CSAPR. ....... 32 

Table 14 Hancock County, West Virginia PM2.5 Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year 

2005, Estimated 2008, and Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CSAPR. ....... 32 

Table 15 Steubenville-Weirton Area PM2.5 Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year 2005, 

Estimated 2008, and Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – Without CAIR (Ohio) and 

With CSAPR (West Virginia). .............................................................................. 33 

Table 16 Jefferson County, Ohio NOx Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year 2005, 

Estimated 2008, and Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CAIR ..................... 33 

Table 17 Brooke County, West Virginia NOx Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year 

2005, Estimated 2008, and Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CSAPR ........ 33 

Table 18 Hancock County, West Virginia NOx Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year 

2005, Estimated 2008, and Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CSAPR. ....... 34 

Table 19 Steubenville-Weirton Area NOx Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year 2005, 

Estimated 2008, and Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CAIR (Ohio) and With 

CSAPR (West Virginia). ...................................................................................... 34 

Table 20 Jefferson County, Ohio SO2 Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year 2005, 

Estimated 2008, and Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CAIR ..................... 34 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 6
 iii 

Table 21 Brooke County, West Virginia SO2 Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year 

2005, Estimated 2008, and Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CSAPR ........ 35 

Table 22 Hancock County, West Virginia SO2 Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year 

2005, Estimated 2008, and Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CSAPR ........ 35 

Table 23 Steubenville-Weirton Area SO2 Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year 2005, 

Estimated 2008, and Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CAIR (Ohio) and With 

CSAPR (West Virginia) ....................................................................................... 35 

Table 24 Steubenville-Weirton Area Comparison of 2008 attainment year and 2015 and 

2025 Projected Emission Estimates (tpy) ............................................................ 36 

Table 25 Steubenville-Weirton Area Combined Comparison of 2005 Base Year and 2008 

Attainment Year On-Road and EGU Reductions ................................................ 38 

APPENDICES 

A Air Quality System (AQS) Data 

B Ohio 2005 SIP Base Year Inventory Discussion 

C Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Steubenville-Weirton PM2.5 Nonattainment 

Area

D LADCO Technical Support Document and WVDAQ Nonroad Modeling 

E Incomplete Monitoring Data Substitution Analysis 

F Public Participation Documentation

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 7
 iv 

This page left intentionally blank 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 8
REDESIGNATION REQUEST AND MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR THE OHIO 

PORTION OF THE STEUBENVILLE-WEIRTON OH-WV 

24-HOUR PM2.5 NONATTAINMENT AREA 

Jefferson County, Ohio 

CHAPTER ONE 

Introduction 

The Clean Air Act (CAA), as amended, requires each State with areas failing 

to meet the 24-hour PM2.5

1

 National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) to 

develop State Implementation Plans (SIPs) to expeditiously attain and 

maintain the standard. The United States Environmental Protection Agency 

(U.S. EPA) revised the NAAQS for particulate matter in 2006. In 2006, U.S. 

EPA strengthened the primary 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS from 65 μg/m3 to 35 

μg/m3, and retained the current primary annual PM2.5 NAAQS at 15.0 μg/m3. 

The revised 24-hour PM2.5 standard was published on October 17, 2006 (71 

FR 61144) and became effective on December 18, 2006. The standard is 

based on the 3-year average of the 98th percentile of 24-hour concentrations. 

 

On November 13, 2009, U.S. EPA promulgated (74 FR 58688) the initial 

PM2.5 nonattainment areas designations for the 24-hour PM2.5 standard 

across the country (effective December 14, 2009). Unlike Subpart 2 of the 

CAA Amendments of 1990 which defined five ozone nonattainment 

classifications for the areas that exceed the NAAQS based on the severity of 

the ozone levels, PM2.5 nonattainment designations are simply labeled 

“nonattainment.” The CAA Amendments require states with PM2.5

nonattainment areas to submit a plan within three years of the effective date 

of the designations (December 14, 2012) detailing how the PM2.5 standard will 

be attained by December 14, 2014. However, areas that attain before the 

required date for submitting a plan may be exempt from certain otherwise 

applicable requirements. 

Section 107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA allows states to request nonattainment areas 

to be redesignated to attainment provided certain criteria are met. The 

following are the criteria that must be met in order for an area to be 

 

1 Particle pollution is a mixture of microscopic solids and liquid droplets suspended in air. This pollution, 

also known as particulate matter, is made up of a number of components, including acids (such as 

nitrates and sulfates), organic chemicals, metals, soil or dust particles, and allergens (such as 

fragments of pollen or mold spores). 

Fine particle pollution or PM2.5 describes particulate matter that is 2.5 micrometers in diameter and 

smaller - 1/30th the diameter of a human hair. Fine particle pollution can be emitted directly or formed 

secondarily in the atmosphere. 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 9
 2 

redesignated from nonattainment to attainment: 

• A determination that the area has attained the PM2.5

standard.

• An approved State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the area 

under Section 110(k).

• A determination that the improvement in air quality is due to 

permanent and enforceable reductions in emissions resulting 

from implementation of the SIP and other federal 

requirements.

• A fully approved maintenance plan under Section 175(A).

• A determination that all Section 110 and Part D requirements 

have been met. 

This document addresses each of these requirements, and provides 

additional information to support continued compliance with the 24-hour PM2.5

standard. 

On October 4, 2011, U.S. EPA proposed (76 FR 61291) to determine that the 

Steubenville-Weirton nonattainment area has clean data for the 24-hour PM2.5 

standard2. The proposed determination is based upon quality assured, quality 

controlled, and certified ambient air monitoring data showing the area has 

monitored attainment based on 2008 through 2010 data. 

 The Steubenville-Weirton area has previously been subject to nonattainment 

area rulemakings for the 1997 fine particle NAAQS. Ohio was only subject to 

requirements to address the annual standard under the 1997 fine particle 

NAAQS as there were no monitors in Ohio that violated the 1997 24-hour 

PM2.5 standard of 65 μg/m3. In April, 2012, Ohio EPA submitted a 

redesignation request and maintenance plan for the Steubenville-Weirton 

1997 annual standard nonattainment area. 

Geographical Description and Background 

The current Steubenville-Weirton nonattainment area is located on the 

eastern border of Ohio and includes the following counties: Jefferson in Ohio 

and Hancock and Brooke in West Virginia. This area is shown in Figure 2 

under Chapter Three. 

As a result of the 2009 PM2.5 designations, U.S. EPA designated the 

Steubenville-Weirton area nonattainment for the 35 μg/m3 24-hour standard, 

and Ohio EPA is required to develop a plan to reduce oxides of nitrogen 

(NOx), sulfur dioxide (SO2) and direct PM2.5 emissions and to demonstrate 

that the area will meet the federal 24-hour air quality standard by December 

 

2 This proposal was based on a February 14, 2011 request submitted by the West Virginia 

Division of Air Quality. 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 10
 3 

14, 2014. Ohio’s main PM2.5 components are primary particles (organic 

carbon, crustal material, and elemental carbon), SO2 and NOx, which were 

included in the attainment demonstration analysis for the 1997 annual PM2.5 

NAAQS submitted to U.S. EPA on July 16, 2008. Volatile organic compounds 

(VOCs) and ammonia (NH3) were not included in the analysis since they 

were not part of Ohio’s attainment strategy for PM2.5 (although controls for 

VOCs have been implemented for ozone nonattainment). This is consistent 

with U.S. EPA’s “Clean Air Particle Implementation Rule” [74 FR 20856] 

(hereafter referred to as “1997 Implementation Rule”). In the 1997 

Implementation Rule U.S. EPA presumes NH3 emissions are not a PM2.5

attainment plan precursor and that States are not required to address VOC 

unless the State or U.S. EPA makes a technical demonstration that emissions 

of VOCs significantly contribute to nonattainment of the PM2.5 standard. This 

is also consistent with U.S. EPA’s “Implementation Guidance for the 2006 24-

Hour Fine Particle (PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)” 

memorandum issued on March 2, 2012 (hereafter referred to as “2006 

Implementation Memo”). In this memorandum, U.S. EPA recommends that 

“the projected attainment inventory for the nonattainment area includes direct 

PM2.5, SO2, presumptively NOx, as well as other precursors that have been 

determined to be significant through the area’s SIP development process.” 

Furthermore, the 2006 Implementation Memo indicates that U.S. EPA 

believes the overall framework and policy approach of the 1997 

Implementation Rule “continues to provide effective and appropriate guidance 

on the EPA’s interpretation of the general statutory requirements that states 

should address in their SIPs” and that they are “relevant to the statutory 

requirements” for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard. 

This document is intended to support Ohio’s request that the Ohio portions of 

the Steubenville-Weirton area be redesignated from nonattainment to 

attainment for the 24-hour PM2.5 standard. In addition, the State of West 

Virginia may also submit a request for their respective portions of the 

Steubenville-Weirton area. 

Status of Air Quality 

PM2.5 complete quality-assured ambient air quality monitoring data for the 

three (3) years, 2008 through 2010, demonstrate that the air quality has met 

the NAAQS for 24-hour PM2.5 in this nonattainment area. The NAAQS 

attainment, accompanied by decreases in emission levels discussed in 

Chapter Four, supports a redesignation to attainment for the SteubenvilleWeirton area based on the requirements in Section 107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA 

as amended. 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 11
 4 

CHAPTER TWO 

Requirements for Redesignation 

U.S. EPA has published detailed guidance in a document entitled Procedures 

for Processing Requests to Redesignate Areas to Attainment (redesignation 

guidance), issued September 4, 1992, to Regional Air Directors. The 

redesignation request and maintenance plan are based on the redesignation 

guidance, supplemented with additional guidance received from staff of U.S. 

EPA Region 5. 

Below is a summary of each redesignation criterion as it applies to the 

Steubenville-Weirton area. 

i.) Attainment of the standard (CAA Section 107(d)(3)(E)(i)) 

 There are two components involved in making this 

demonstration. The first component relies on ambient air quality 

data. The data that are used to demonstrate attainment should 

be the product of ambient monitoring that is representative of 

the area of highest concentration. The data should be collected 

and quality-assured in accordance with 40 CFR 58 and 

recorded in the Air Quality System (AQS) in order for it to be 

available to the public for review. 

 The second component relies upon supplemental U.S. EPAapproved air quality modeling. While no modeling is required for 

redesignating nonattainment areas, the redesignation guidance 

states it is “generally necessary” for particulate matter 

redesignations. Appendix C and Appendix D contains the most 

recent modeling results showing future attainment and 

maintenance are provided. Chapter Three discusses this 

requirement in more detail and provides the attainment 

demonstration. 

ii.) Permanent and enforceable improvement in air quality (CAA Section 

107(d)(3)(E)(iii)) 

 The state must be able to reasonably attribute the improvement 

in air quality to emission reductions which are permanent and 

enforceable. The state should estimate the percent reduction 

achieved from federal measures as well as control measures 

that have been adopted and implemented by the state. 

It was not necessary for Ohio to adopt or implement control 

measures for these counties beyond the federal measures. 

Ohio EPA has adopted several rules recently that will have an 

impact on statewide PM2.5 emissions in the future: 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 12
 5 

• Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) 

• NOx SIP Call Rules 

 Ohio was also subject to a Federal Implementation Plan under 

the CAIR replacement rule, the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule 

(CSAPR) that could have resulted in even greater reductions 

than the CAIR program. However, on December 30, 2011, the 

D.C. Circuit Court stayed CSAPR and ordered U.S. EPA to 

continue administering CAIR pending the court’s resolution. 

 In addition, since the initial designations were made federally 

enforceable consent decrees have resulted in reductions in 

emissions from utilities within Jefferson County and across the 

state, including this area. 

 Chapters Four and Five discuss this requirement in more detail. 

iii.) Section 110 and Part D requirements (CAA Section 107(d)(3)(E)(v)) 

 For purposes of redesignation, a state must meet all 

requirements of Section 110 and Part D that were applicable 

prior to submittal of the complete redesignation request. 

 Subpart 1 of Part D consists of general requirements applicable 

to all areas which are designated nonattainment based on a 

violation of the NAAQS. Subpart 4 of Part D consists of more 

specific requirements applicable to particulate matter 

(specifically to address PM10). However, for the purpose of 

implementing the PM2.5 standard, U.S. EPA’s 1997 

Implementation Rule stated Subpart 1, rather than Subpart 4, is 

appropriate for the purpose of implementing PM2.5.[72 FR 

20589] 

 Section 110(a) requirements 

Section 110(a) of Title I of the CAA contains the general 

requirements for a SIP. Section 110(a)(2) provides that 

the implementation plan submitted by a state must have 

been adopted by the state after reasonable public notice 

and hearing, and that, among other things, it must 

include enforceable emission limitations and other control 

measures, means or techniques necessary to meet the 

requirements of the CAA; provide for establishment and 

operation of appropriate devices, methods, systems and 

procedures necessary to monitor ambient air quality; 

provide for implementation of a source permit program to 

regulate the modification and construction of any 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 13
 6 

stationary source within the areas covered by the plan; 

include provisions for the implementation of Part C, 

prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) and Part D, 

NSR permit programs; include criteria for stationary 

source emission control measures, monitoring, and 

reporting; include provisions for air quality modeling; and 

provide for public and local agency participation in 

planning and emission control rule development. In 

Ohio’s December 5, 2007 and September 4, 2009 

infrastructure SIP submissions, Ohio verified that the 

State fulfills the requirements of Section 110(a)(2) of the 

Act. 

Section 110(a)(2)(D) also requires State plans to prohibit 

emissions from within the State which contribute 

significantly to nonattainment or maintenance areas in 

any other State, or which interfere with programs under 

Part C to prevent significant deterioration of air quality or 

to achieve reasonable progress toward the national 

visibility goal for Federal class I areas (national parks and 

wilderness areas). In order to assist States in addressing 

their obligations regarding regionally transported 

pollution, U.S. EPA finalized CAIR to reduce SO2 and 

NOx emissions from large electric generating units 

(EGU). Ohio has met the requirements of the federal 

CAIR to reduce NOx and SO2 emissions contributing to 

downwind states. On February 1, 2008, U.S. EPA 

approved Ohio’s CAIR program, which can be found in 

Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) Chapter 3745-1093

. On 

July 6, 2011, U.S. EPA finalized a replacement to the 

CAIR program, the CSAPR. CSAPR could further assist 

States in addressing their obligations regarding regionally 

transported pollution by providing reductions in NOx and 

SO2 emissions in 2012 and 2014. However, on 

December 30, 2011, the D.C. Circuit Court stayed 

CSAPR and ordered U.S. EPA to continue administering 

CAIR pending the court’s resolution. 

iv.) Section 172(c) requirements 

 This Section contains general requirements for nonattainment 

plans. The requirements for reasonable further progress, 

identification of certain emissions increases, and other 

measures needed for attainment will not apply for 

redesignations because they only have meaning for areas not 

 

3 http://www.epa.ohio.gov/dapc/regs/regs.aspx#3745-109 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 14
 7 

attaining the standard. The requirements for an emission 

inventory will be satisfied by the inventory requirements of the 

maintenance plan. Chapters Four and Five discuss this 

requirement in more detail. 

v.) Conformity 

The state must work with U.S. EPA to show that its SIP 

provisions are consistent with the Section 176(c)(4) conformity 

requirements. The redesignation request should include 

conformity procedures, if the state already has these 

procedures in place. If a state does not have conformity 

procedures in place at the time that it submits a redesignation 

request, the state must commit to follow U.S. EPA’s conformity 

regulation upon issuance, as applicable. 

vi.) Maintenance plans (CAA Section 107(d)(3)(E)(iv)) 

 Section 107(d)(3)(E) stipulates that for an area to be 

redesignated, U.S. EPA must fully approve a maintenance plan 

that meets the requirements of Section 175(A). The 

maintenance plan will constitute a SIP revision and must 

provide for maintenance of the relevant NAAQS in the area for 

at least 10 years after redesignation. Section 175 (A) further 

states that the plan shall contain such additional measures, if 

any, as may be necessary to ensure such maintenance. 

In addition, the maintenance plan shall contain such 

contingency measures as the Administrator deems necessary to 

ensure prompt correction of any violation of the NAAQS. At a 

minimum, the contingency measures must include a 

requirement that the state will implement all measures 

contained in the nonattainment SIP prior to redesignation. 

States seeking redesignation of a nonattainment area should 

consider the following provisions: 

 a.) attainment inventory; 

 b.) maintenance demonstration; 

 c.) monitoring network; 

 d.) verification of continued attainment; and 

 e.) contingency plan. 

 

 U.S. EPA’s 2006 Implementation Memo states: 

As mentioned earlier in this memorandum, statewide annual 

emission inventories are required under 40 CFR Part 51, 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 15
 8 

Subpart A. We expect that for many nonattainment areas, these 

annual inventories will serve as an appropriate starting point for 

the emission inventories used for SIP development. In contrast 

with the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS, where states rely only on 

annual inventories in the implementation process, the 2006 24-

hour PM2.5 NAAQS is designed to protect against peak 

exposures. Thus, for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS, there are 

some circumstances in which EPA believes that seasonal 

inventories may be useful for SIP planning purposes. For 

example, we have observed that in some nonattainment areas, 

all of the highest fine particle concentrations over the course of 

a year occur in one season. 

If exceedances occur during only one season for each of the 

years on which the nonattainment designation is based, and this 

is the case for all subsequent years, we recommend that states 

develop a seasonal inventory and that they use this inventory 

for SIP planning purposes.... 

Ohio EPA analyzed the PM2.5 monitoring data for the SteubenvilleWeirton area to determine whether the exceedances occurred in only 

one season. As can be seen in Figure 2 below, exceedances between 

2006 and 2008, the years on which the nonattainment designation is 

based, occurred in the first, second, third and fourth quarters. During 

subsequent years, 2009 through 2010, exceedances have occurred in 

the first, third and fourth quarters. Based on this analysis and in 

consultation with U.S. EPA and the West Virginia Division of Air Quality 

(WVDAQ), it was determined that an annual inventory would be 

sufficient for SIP planning, and that a seasonal inventory would not be 

required. 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 16
 9 

Figure 1 – Steubenville-Weirton 24-hour PM2.5 Exceedances 

 

 Chapter Six discusses this requirement in more detail. 

1

3

4

1 1

11 11

0

2

3

14

0

2

0 0

1 1

0

1

0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

Number of Exceedances

Steubenville‐Weirton Area 24‐hr PM2.5 Exceedances

(>34.4 ug/m3) per Quarter

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 17
 10 

CHAPTER THREE 

PM2.5 MONITORING 

CAA Section 107(d)(3)(E)(i) 

Requirement 1 of 4 

A demonstration that the NAAQS for 24-hour PM2.5, as published in 40 CFR 

50.7, has been attained. 

Background

 There are 5 monitors measuring PM2.5 concentrations in this 

nonattainment area. Two monitors in Jefferson County, Ohio4

, 

two in Brooke County, WV and one in Hancock County, WV. A 

listing of the design values based on the three-year average of 

the annual mean concentrations from 2008 through 2010 and a 

listing of the design values based on the three-year average of 

the 98th percentile are shown in Table 1. The locations of the 

monitoring sites for this nonattainment area are shown on 

Figure 2. 

 

4 Operated by Ohio EPA Division of Air Pollution Control, Southeast District Office.

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 18
D

 

F

Require

Ambient

recorded

for publi

D

O

a

O

th

Require

A show

concent

affected

three co

Demonstrat

Figure 2 - M

a

ement 2 of 

t monitoring

d in the U.

c view. 

Demonstrat

Ohio EPA 

ccordance 

Ohio EPA h

he data are

ement 3 of 

wing that th

rations, ba

 downwind

omplete, con

tion

Map of the 

and Monito

4 

g data qua

S. EPA air

tion

has qualit

with 40 C

as recorde

 available t

4 

he three-ye

ased on da

 environs, 

nsecutive c

Steubenv

or Location

ality assure

r quality sy

y assured 

CFR 58.10 

ed the data 

to the public

ear averag

ata from al

are below 3

calendar ye

ille-Weirto

ns 

d in accord

ystem (AQS

all data 

and all ot

in the AQS

c. 

ge of the 9

l monitorin

35 μg/m3. (

ears of qual

on, OH-WV

dance with 

S) database

shown in 

ther federa

S database

98th percen

ng sites in 

(This show

ity assured

Nonattain

40 CFR 5

e, and ava

Appendix 

al requirem

e and, there

ntile of 24

the area 

ing must re

 data.) 

11 

nment Area

58.10, 

ailable 

A in 

ments. 

efore, 

4-hour 

or its 

ely on 

a

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 19
 12 

Background

 

The following information is taken from U.S. EPA's "Guideline 

on Data Handling Conventions for the PM NAAQS," U.S. EPA454/R-99-008, April 1999. 

 In accordance with the CAA Amendments, three complete years 

of monitoring data are required to demonstrate attainment at a 

monitoring site. The 24-hour PM2.5 primary and secondary 

ambient air quality standards are met at an ambient air quality 

monitoring site when the three-year average of the 24-hour 98th 

percentile values are less than or equal to 35 μg/m3

. While 

calculating design values, one decimal place must be carried in 

the computations, with final values rounded to the nearest 1 

μg/m3

. Decimals 0. 5 or greater are rounded up, and those less 

than 0. 5 are rounded down, so that 35.349 μg/m3 is the largest 

concentration that is less than, or equal to 35 μg/m3

. Values at 

or below 35 μg/m3 meet the standard; values greater than 35 

μg/m3

 exceed the standard. An area is in compliance with the 

24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS only if every monitoring site in the area 

meets the NAAQS. An individual site's 3-year average of the 24-

hour 98th percentile concentrations is also called the site's 

design value. The air quality design value for the area is the 

highest design value among all sites in the area. 

Table 1 shows the monitoring data for 2008 - 2010 that were 

retrieved from the U.S. EPA AQS. 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 20
 13 

Demonstration

Table 1 - Monitoring Data for the Steubenville-Weirton, OH-WV 

area for 2008 – 2010 

 Annual Standard 24-Hour Standard 

 Year Average 

2008-2010 

Year Average 

Site County 2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010 2008-2010 

39-081-

0017 (a) Jefferson, 

OH 

14.3 12.1 12.7 13.0 35.2 24.7 29.8 30 

39-081-

1001 14.1 11.2 12.7 12.7 35.0 23.3 25.1 28 

54-009-

0005 Brooke, 

WV 

14.7 12.2 14.1 13.7 38.9 23.2 29.8 31 

54-009-

0011 13.8 11.9 13.5 13.1 34.9 26.3 31.6 31 

54-029-

1004 

Hancock, 

WV 13.3 11.2 12.6 12.4 35.8 25.2 31.2 31 

 Less than 75% capture in at least one quarter 

(a) This site has a 73% capture, resulting in one day of missed data. Based on the data from previous 

years, this site shows a decreasing tren in monitor readings. Ohio believes that had the missing data 

been collected it would not have resulted in a design value that would exceed the standard. 

Source: U.S. EPA Air Quality System (AQS); http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/index.htm 

The design value calculated for the Steubenville-Weirton area 

demonstrates that the 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS has been attained. 

However, one monitor site in Jefferson County (site 39-081-0017), did 

not comply with the 75% data capture requirement for the 2008-2010 

period. Specifically, the fourth quarter (October, November, and 

December) of 2008 has only 73% capture. This monitoring site 

experienced instrument malfunction during the low percentage capture 

missing a total of 8 missing 1-in-3 day PM2.5 FRM runs. 

Under 40 CFR Part 50, Appendix N, the use of less than complete data 

may be approved by U.S. EPA considering such factors as monitoring 

site closures/moves, monitoring diligence, and nearby concentrations 

in determining whether to use such data. However, in order to further 

demonstrate that this monitor has attained the standard, Ohio EPA 

prepared a statistical analysis of the 24-hour standard using multiple 

imputations. Ohio EPA has imputed missing values for this site and 

then performed an ordinary analysis as if the imputed values were real 

measurements. Multiple imputations use random draws from the 

conditional distribution of the target variable given the other variables. 

When a regression model is used for imputation, the process involves 

adding a random residual to the “best guess” for missing values, to 

yield the same conditional variance as the original variable. Appendix 

E describes, and includes, the full statistical analyses performed to 

show that the three-year average (2008 to 2010) of the 98th percentile 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 21
 14 

24-hour values, based on missing data imputations, is 30 μg/m3, below 

the 35 μg/m3 24-hour standard. 

Table 2 shows site 39-081-0017 before and after the imputation of 

missing data. Also the “new” site (with imputed values) shows a 

passing 24-hour design value for 2008 to 2010 of 30 μg/m3. 

Table 2 - 98th Percentile and Design Value Before and After Imputation 

With the data imputation analysis and results, Requirement 3 of 4 has 

been met. 

The area’s design values have trended downward as emissions have 

declined due to cleaner automobiles and fuels, and controls for EGUs. 

National monitoring for PM2.5 began in 1999. There has been a clear 

downward trend in design values for all monitors in Ohio and West 

Virginia, as shown in Figures 3 and 4. Design values have also 

trended downward nationally, as show in Figure 5. 

39‐081‐0017 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2003‐2005 2004‐2006 2005‐2007 2006‐2008 2007‐2009 2008‐2010

OLD Creditable 17 104 94 115 111 106 112 108

OLD 98th 39.6 43.8 43.8 32.1 43.5 35.2 24.7 29.8

New Creditable 119 120 121 115 111 121 112 108

New 98th 30.4 43.9 40.3 32.1 43.5 35.2 24.7 29.8

less than 75% capture in at least one quarter

Year includes one or more quarters with imputed values

37 34 30

38 39 39 37 34 30

42 40 40

YEAR 24‐Hour Design Value

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 22
F

S

Figure 3 - O

2

Source: WVD

hio 24-Ho

2008-2010 

EP: http://ww

our PM2.5: 

w.epa.gov/ai

PM2

Design V

rtrends/value

5dv2008201

alues 1999

es.html, from E

0Final.xls 

9-2001 thr

xcel spreads

15 

ough 

heet: 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 23
F

S

 

F

Figure 4 - W

T

Source: WVD

Figure 5 - P

 

Source

West Virgin

Through 20

EP: http://ww

PM2.5 Mean 

e:http://www.ep

nia 24-Hou

008-2010

ww.epa.gov/ai

PM2

National T

pa.gov/airtrends

ur PM2.5 D

rtrends/value

25dv2008201

Trends 

s/pm.html 

Design Val

es.html, from E

0Final.xls 

ues: 1999-

xcel spreads

16 

2001 

heet: 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 24
 17 

Requirement 4 of 4 

A commitment that once redesignated, the state will continue to operate an 

appropriate monitoring network to verify the maintenance of the attainment 

status. 

Demonstration

 Ohio EPA commits to continue monitoring PM2.5 levels at the 

Ohio sites indicated in Figure 2 and Table 1. Ohio EPA will 

consult with U.S. EPA Region 5 prior to making changes to the 

existing monitoring network, should changes become necessary 

in the future. Ohio EPA will continue to quality assure the 

monitoring data to meet the requirements of 40 CFR 58 and all 

other federal requirements. Connection to a central station and 

updates to the Ohio EPA web site5

 will provide real time 

availability of the data and knowledge of any exceedances. Ohio 

EPA will enter all data into AQS on a timely basis in accordance 

with federal guidelines. 

 

5 www.epa.ohio.gov/dapc 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 25
 18 

CHAPTER FOUR 

EMISSION INVENTORY

CAA Section 107(d)(3)(E)(iii) 

U.S. EPA’s redesignation guidance requires the submittal of a comprehensive 

inventory of PM2.5 precursor emissions (primary particles (organic carbon, 

crustal matter, and elemental carbon), SO2 and NOx

6

) representative of the 

year when the area achieves attainment of the 24-hour PM2.5 air quality 

standard. Ohio also must demonstrate that the improvement in air quality 

between the year that violations occurred and the year that attainment was 

achieved is based on permanent and enforceable emission reductions. Other 

emission inventory related requirements include a projection of the emission 

inventory to a year at least 10 years following redesignation; a demonstration 

that the projected level of emissions is sufficient to maintain the 24-hour PM2.5

standard; and a commitment to provide future updates of the inventory to 

enable tracking of emission levels during the 10-year maintenance period. 

The emissions inventory development and emissions projection discussion 

below, with the exception of the mobile (on-road) emissions inventory and 

projections, identifies procedures used by Ohio EPA and the LADCO 

regarding emissions from Ohio’s portion of the Steubenville-Weirton area. 

Specific emissions data are provided for all counties, including those in Ohio 

and West Virginia. West Virginia emissions data were obtained though the 

West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (WVDEP). All of these 

inventories and emissions projections were prepared using similar 

methodologies, unless otherwise noted. Mobile emissions inventories and 

projections for all counties were prepared by the Brooke-Hancock-Jefferson 

Metropolitan Planning Commission (BHJ) and the Ohio Department of 

Transportation (ODOT), with data provided by Ohio EPA, West Virginia 

Department of Transportation (WVDOT), and WVDEP. 

Requirement 1 of 5 

A comprehensive emission inventory of PM2.5, SO2 and NOx completed for the 

base year. 

Background

The 2005 periodic inventory has been identified as one of the 

preferred databases for SIP development and coincides with 

nonattainment air quality in the Steubenville-Weirton area. 

Periodic inventories, which include emissions from all sectors 

are prepared every three years by Ohio EPA. Ohio’s 2005 

 

6 VOC and NH3 are not addressed. 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 26
 19 

emissions data for all sources (Electrical Generating Unit (EGUPoint); Non-Electrical Generating Unit (Non-EGU); Non-road 

Mobile (Non-road); Other Area (Area); and Marine; Aircraft; Rail 

(MAR)) are derived from this inventory. Ohio’s point source data 

derived from this periodic inventory is actual source reported 

emissions under Ohio's annual emissions reporting program. 

West Virginia’s point source data are taken from U.S. EPA’s 

CSAPR estimates (EGU) and actual reported data under West 

Virginia’s emissions reporting program (non-EGUs). West 

Virginia’s emissions data for MAR and Area is derived from the 

2005 National Emissions Inventory (NEI) while Non-road 

emissions are derived from NONROAD modeling conducted by 

WVDAQ.

Demonstration

Ohio’s 2005 inventory is used as the base year for the purpose 

of this submittal and was submitted to U.S. EPA with Ohio’s 

PM2.5 attainment demonstration SIP submitted on July 18, 2008 

and revised on June 7, 2010. The detailed emission inventory 

information for Ohio’s portion of the Steubenville-Weirton area is 

provided in Appendix B. Emissions of PM2.5, SO2 and NOx for 

2005 are identified under Requirement Three of this Chapter. 

Requirement 2 of 5 

A projection of the emission inventory to a year at least 10 years following 

redesignation. 

Background

Ohio EPA prepared a comprehensive inventory for the Ohio portion of 

the Steubenville-Weirton area including area, mobile, and point 

sources for PM2.5, SO2 and NOx for base year 2005. The 2005 

inventory was submitted to U.S. EPA on July 18, 2008 as part of 

Ohio’s PM2.5 attainment demonstration SIP for this area. The 

information below describes the procedures Ohio EPA used to 

generate the 2005 base year inventory and to develop SIP-ready 

modeling inventories and future year projections (Pechan Report7

) 

based on a 2005 base year inventory. The report by Pechan generated 

future year estimates of annual emissions for each source sector using 

accepted growth surrogates. These inventories were provided to the 

LADCO and have been processed to develop average daily emissions 

 

7 

http://www.ladco.org/tech/emis/r5/reports/LADCO%202005%20Base%20Yr%20Growth%20and%20Co

ntrols%20Report_Final.pdf 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 27
 20 

for use in the air quality analyses. These processed modeling 

inventories have been identified as the correct iteration of the inventory 

for use in the redesignation. In this document, references to LADCO 

include the Midwest Regional Planning Organization. Note, that the onroad mobile source sector was addressed by specific PM2.5 and NOx

modeling as discussed below. 

• Area source and MAR emissions were taken from the 

Ohio 2005 periodic inventory submitted to U.S. EPA. 

These projections were made from the U.S. Department 

of Commerce Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) 

growth factors, with some updated local information. 

• Mobile source emissions were calculated from 

MOVES2010 produced emission factors. Only PM2.5 and 

NOx necessitate an emissions inventory analysis. Ohio 

EPA in consultation with U.S. EPA determined mobile 

sources are insignificant contributors for SO2. Consistent 

with Ohio EPA’s attainment demonstration, Ohio EPA 

continues to consider mobile source SO2 to be an 

insignificant contributor to fine particles for this 

nonattainment area. Based on the results of mobile 

source emissions projections prepared as part of this 

redesignation and maintenance plan, Ohio EPA is also 

making a finding that the regional highway emissions 

PM2.5 and NOx are insignificant contributors to the 

nonattainment problem in this area, as discussed below 

• Point source information was compiled from Ohio EPA’s 

2005 annual emissions inventory database and the 2005 

U.S. EPA Air Markets acid rain database8. 

• Biogenic emissions are not included in these summaries. 

• Non-road emissions were derived from NONROAD 

modeling conducted by WVDAQ, as found in Appendix 

D. 

West Virginia emission projections were provided by the 

WVDAQ as summarized below. 

 

• Area source and MAR emissions were compiled from the 

2008 NEI and 2015 and 2025 projections were grown 

using Workforce data. 

• Mobile source emissions were calculated using the same 

methodology as described above for Ohio’s portion. 

• EGU point source information was compiled from U.S. 

EPA’s CSAPR inventories. 

 

8 http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/acidrain 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 28
 21 

• Non-EGU point source information was compiled from 

West Virginia’s 2008 actual emissions inventory and 

2015 and 2025 projections were grown using Workforce 

data. 

• Non-road emissions were derived from NONROAD 

modeling conducted by WVDAQ, as found in Appendix 

D. 

 

 

Demonstration

On-Road Emission Estimations 

The ODOT, Division of Transportation System DevelopmentModeling and Forecasting Section and the Brooke-HancockJefferson Metropolitan Planning Commission (BHJ) defined the 

underlying planning assumptions for the annual PM2.5 on-road 

mobile source emission inventories for the Steubenville-Weirton, 

OH-WV nonattainment area. 

In coordination with the ODOT, BHJ utilizes a regional travel 

demand forecast model to simulate traffic in the area and to 

forecast traffic flows for given growth expectations. The model 

is primarily used as a long range planning tool to evaluate the 

transportation system including determination of locations where 

additional travel capacity may be needed and to determine the 

infrastructure requirements necessary to meet that need. It is 

also used as a tool for air quality purposes to estimate the total 

emissions of pollution caused by vehicles in the area. The 

travel demand forecasting model is used to predict traffic 

volumes vehicle miles traveled (VMT), travel speeds, and a U.S. 

EPA computer program called MOVES is used to calculate 

emissions per mile. The product of these is the total amount of 

pollution emitted by the on-road vehicles for the area. 

Overview 

U.S.EPA published a Federal Register notice9 of availability on 

March 2, 2010, to approve MOVES2010 (Motor Vehicle 

Emissions Simulator), hereafter referred to as MOVES. Upon 

publication of the Federal Register notice, MOVES became U.S. 

EPA’s approved motor vehicle emission factor model for 

estimating VOCs, NOx, CO, PM10 and PM2.5 and other pollutants 

and precursors from cars, trucks, motorcycles, and buses by 

state and local agencies. MOVES is a computer program 

designed by the U.S. EPA to estimate air pollution emissions 

 

9 http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480ab1f98 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 29
 22 

from mobile sources. MOVES replaces U.S. EPA’s previous 

emissions model for on-road mobile sources, MOBILE6.2. 

MOVES can be used to estimate exhaust and evaporative 

emissions as well as brake and tire wear emissions from all 

types of on-road vehicles. 

The CAA requires U.S. EPA to regularly update its mobile 

source emission models. U.S. EPA continuously collects data 

and measures vehicle emissions to make sure the Agency has 

the best possible understanding of mobile source emissions. 

This assessment, in turn, informs the development of U.S. 

EPA’s mobile source emission models. MOVES represents the 

Agency’s most up-to-date assessment of on-road mobile source 

emissions. MOVES also incorporates several changes to the 

U.S. EPA’s approach to mobile source emission modeling 

based upon recommendations made to the Agency by the 

National Academy of Sciences. 

U.S.EPA believes that MOVES should be used in ozone, CO, 

PM, and nitrogen dioxide SIP development as expeditiously as 

possible. The CAA requires that SIP inventories and control 

measures be based on the most current information and 

applicable models that are available when a SIP is developed. 

Regarding transportation conformity, U.S. EPA and U.S. DOT 

intend to establish a two-year grace period before MOVES is 

required for new transportation conformity analyses. 

The MOVES more detailed approach (when compared with the 

previous MOBILE model) to modeling allows U.S. EPA to easily 

incorporate large amounts of in-use data from a wide variety of 

sources, such as data from vehicle inspection and maintenance 

(I/M) programs, remote sensing device (RSD) testing, 

certification testing, portable emission measurement systems 

(PEMS), etc. This approach also allows users to incorporate a 

variety of activity data to better estimate emission differences 

such as those resulting from changes to vehicle speed and 

acceleration patterns. MOVES has a graphical user interface 

which allows users to more easily set up and run the model. 

MOVES database-centered design provides users much greater 

flexibility regarding output choices. Unlike earlier models which 

provided emission factors in grams-per-mile in fixed output 

formats, MOVES output can be expressed as total mass (in 

tons, pounds, kilograms, or grams) or as emission factors 

(grams-per-mile and in some cases grams-per-vehicle). Output 

can be easily aggregated or disaggregated to examine 

emissions in a range of scales, from national emissions impacts 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 30
 23 

down to the emissions impacts of individual transportation 

projects. The database-centered design also allows U.S. EPA to 

update emissions data incorporated in MOVES more easily and 

will allow users to incorporate a much wider array of activity 

data to improve estimation of local emissions. For example, the 

improvements in MOVES will allow project-level PM2.5 

emissions to be estimated. 

BHJ utilized U.S.EPA’s emissions model MOVES to develop 

emissions factors for SO2, NOx and PM2.5. Further details on the 

use of MOVES are found on Appendix C. BHJ maintains a 

validated region wide Travel Demand Model (TDM) that 

employs a four-step modeling process consisting of trip 

generation, trip distribution, mode choice, and route assignment. 

The current BHJ TMD validation year is 2000. The model uses 

comparable average daily traffic count data, updated socialeconomic variables for each of the analysis years by either 

updating existing or known land use commitment for 2008, 

2009, and 2014, or projected 2014 and 2020 variables based on 

a straight line extrapolation between 2009 set of variables and 

the Horizon Year 2030 variables. These networks represent all 

planned federal-aid projects as well as any regionally significant 

projects found in the BHJ TIP and LRTP expected to be open 

for traffic by the end of each respective analysis year. 

Identifying projected growth centers and understanding urban 

and rural population changes are essential to determine future 

transportation needs in a given study area. Travel forecasting 

procedures require the user delineates the TDM study area into 

geographic areas called Traffic Analysis Zones. Typically, these 

Zones are based on factors such as land use, area types 

(urban, suburban or rural), or political government units such as 

cities, villages, or townships. The BHJ collects and reviews the 

TDM independent variables that characterize current and future 

estimates of the metropolitan area’s social and economic 

activities that may influence land use development patterns. 

 The following categories of planning data are utilized: 

- Population. 

- Households. 

- Household vehicles. 

- Employment. 

- Labor force participation. 

- Area type. 

The principal data requirements of the BHJ travel demand 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 31
 24 

forecasting model are population and employment, from these 

variables other characteristics including household, labor force, 

and personal vehicles may be derived. 

BHJ utilizes both base year (2005) and future year data (2010, 

2020 and 2030) in the planning process. Planning data are 

maintained at the Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) level, and 

originate in the 2000 Census of Population and Housing. Base 

year 2005 and future yare data for each variable are developed 

through various methods. The MOVES model generated the 

emissions factor files for base year 2005 and attainment year 

2008 representing transportation improvement programs 

implemented in the BHJ Region. The model also generated 

emission factors for two future year scenarios 2015 and 2025. 

The single season approach for temperature and relative 

humidity uses weather data collected by the National Oceanic 

and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Climatic Data 

Center (NCDC). The data used in this report, taken from the 

Pittsburgh International Airport collection center, is 

representative of 12 months in 2009. 

BHJ and ODOT incorporates a variety of sources of local data to 

both improve and confirm the accuracy of VMT, as well as other 

travel-related parameters. Free flow speeds used on the 

highway and transit networks are based on travel time studies 

performed locally. A BHJ post-processing program uses the 

loaded highway network to generate VMT by hour, VMT by 

speed distribution, and VMT by facility type. These tables are 

then included as input into MOVES. 

On-Road Mobile Emission Estimations 

Tables 2 through 8 contain the results of the emissions analysis for the 

appropriate years. All emissions estimations are expressed in tons per 

year (tpy). 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 32
 25 

Table 3 - Jefferson County, OH, Emissions Estimations for OnRoad Mobile Sources 

 2005 2008 2015 2025 

PM2.5 (tpy) 73.17 60.97 31.88 16.49

NOx (tpy) 2105.85 1758.04 870.17 322.71

SO2 (tpy) 18.18 5.65 3.93 3.56

Annual VMT 562,071,084 557,286,295 544,597,475 572,657,778

Table 4 – Summary of Ohio Emissions Estimations for On-Road 

Mobile Sources 

 2005 2008 2015 2025 

PM2.5 (tpy) 73.17 60.97 31.88 16.49

NOx (tpy) 2105.85 1758.04 870.17 322.71

SO2 (tpy) 18.18 5.65 3.93 3.56

Annual VMT 562,071,084 557,286,295 544,597,475 572,657,778 

Table 5 – Brooke County, WV, Emissions Estimations for OnRoad Mobile Sources 

 2005 2008 2015 2025 

PM2.5 (tpy) 19.41 14.42 6.97 4.34

NOx (tpy) 540.40 412.02 174.71 62.47

SO2 (tpy) 7.01 2.11 1.51 1.26

Annual VMT 212,244,639 212,778,859 219,881,355 216,619,184

 

Table 6 – Hancock County, WV, Emissions Estimations for OnRoad Mobile Sources 

 2005 2008 2015 2025 

PM2.5 (tpy) 18.63 13.51 6.53 4.10

NOx (tpy) 482.75 360.25 149.00 52.09

SO2 (tpy) 6.58 1.92 1.36 1.10

Annual VMT 180,767,718 177,219,697 180,298,107 174,534,361

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 33
 26 

Table 7 – Summary of West Virginia Emissions Estimations for 

On-Road Mobile Sources 

 2005 2008 2015 2025 

PM2.5 (tpy) 38.04 27.93 13.5 8.44

NOx (tpy) 1023.15 772.27 323.71 114.56

SO2 (tpy) 13.59 4.03 2.87 2.36

Annual VMT 393,012,357 389,998,556 400,179,462 390,998,315

Table 8 – Emissions Estimations Totals for On-Road Mobile 

Sources for the Steubenville-Weirton Area 

 2005 2008 2015 2025 

PM2.5 (tpy) 111.21 88.9 45.38 24.93

NOx (tpy) 3129 2530.31 1193.88 437.27

SO2 (tpy) 31.77 9.68 6.80 5.92

Annual VMT 955,083,441 947,284,851 944,776,937 963,656,093 

The following table identifies the percentage of mobile emissions of all 

emissions, for each pollutant in the entire Steubenville-Weirton area 

and Ohio’s portion of this area for 2015 and 2025. 

Table 9 – Percent of Mobile Emissions for the SteubenvilleWeirton Area in 2015 and 2025 

NOx SO2 PM2.5

2015 2025 2015 2025 2015 2025

Steubenville‐

Weirton

Area

Total (tpy) 25,563.36 17,533.17 74,806.60 47,445.13 2,740.52 2,698.00

Mobile (tpy) 1,193.88 437.27 6.80 5.92 45.38 24.93 

% Mobile 4.67% 2.49% 0.009% 0.012% 1.66% 0.92% 

Ohio Portion

Total (tpy) 22,883.61 15,237.65 73,080.25 45,861.72 2,005.04 1,997.72

Mobile (tpy) 870.17 322.71 3.93 3.56 31.88 16.49 

% Mobile 3.80% 2.12% 0.005% 0.008% 1.59% 0.83% 

NOx constitutes less than five percent (4.67%) of the 

area’s total NOx emissions in the 2015 horizon year and 

less than three percent (2.49%) of the area’s total NOx

emissions in the 2025 horizon year. 

SO2 constitutes less than one percent (<1%) of the area’s 

total SO2 emissions in the 2015 and 2025 horizon years. 

PM2.5 constitutes less than two percent (1.66%) of the 

area’s total PM2.5 emissions in the 2015 horizon year and 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 34
 27 

less than one percent (0.92%) of the area’s total PM2.5

emissions in the 2025 horizon year. 

Therefore, the Ohio EPA is herein making a finding that the area’s 

highway emissions for PM2.5, NOx, and SO2 are insignificant 

contributors to the nonattainment problem of the Steubenville-Weirton 

area, as agreed upon as a part of the interagency consultation 

process. Because of this finding it is not necessary to establish mobile 

emission budgets for this area in the 2015 and 2025 horizon years. 

The nonattainment area meets the 40 CFR 93.109(m) criteria for 

PM2.5, NOx, and SO2. Throughout this document, Ohio EPA 

demonstrates that it would be unreasonable to expect that the 

Steubenville-Weirton area would experience enough motor vehicle 

emissions growth in PM2.5, NOx, and SO2 for a PM2.5 NAAQS violation 

to occur. Moreover, Ohio EPA demonstrates that the percentage of 

motor vehicle emissions in the context of the total SIP inventory, the 

current state of air quality as determined by monitoring data, the 

absence of SIP motor vehicle control measures, and historical trends 

and future projections of the growth of motor vehicle emissions, are 

evidence enough to consider mobile source PM2.5, NOx, and SO2

insignificant contributors to fine particles. 

Requirement 3 of 5 

A demonstration that the projected level of emissions is sufficient to maintain 

the PM2.5 standard. 

Background

In consultation with U.S. EPA, Ohio EPA selected the year 2025 

as the maintenance year for this redesignation request. This 

document contains projected emissions inventories for 2015 

and 2025. 

Emission projections for the Steubenville-Weirton area were 

performed using the following approaches: 

• As performed by ODOT and BHJ, mobile source 

emission projections are based on the U.S. EPA MOVES 

model. The analysis is described in more detail in 

Appendix C. All projections were made in accordance 

with “Procedures for Preparing Emissions Projections” 

U.S. EPA-45/4-91-019. As discussed above, it was 

determined that the mobile emission contribution as a 

percent of the total emission inventory from the area is 

not significant. 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 35
 28 

• Emissions inventories are required to be projected to 

future dates to assess the influence growth and future 

controls will have. LADCO has developed growth and 

control files for point and area categories. These files 

were used to develop Ohio’s portion of this 

nonattainment area future-year emissions estimates used 

in this document. This was done so the inventories used 

for redesignation are consistent with modeling performed 

in the future. Appendix D contains LADCO’s technical 

support document detailing the analysis used to project 

emissions (Base M10). 

• For the 2008 attainment year emissions were grown from 

the 2005 LADCO modeling inventory, using LADCO’s 

growth factors, for all sectors except point sources 

(electrical generating units and non-electrical generating 

units). Point source emissions for 2008 were compiled 

from Ohio EPA’s 2008 Annual emissions inventory 

database. The 2015 interim year emissions were 

estimated based on the 2009 and 2018 LADCO modeling 

inventory, using LADCO’s growth factors, for all sectors 

except non-EGU PM2.5. The 2025 maintenance year is 

based on emissions estimates from the 2018 LADCO 

modeling, for all sectors except non-EGU PM2.5. NonEGU PM2.5 emissions for 2015 and 2025 were grown 

from 2005 and 2009 emissions estimates. 

Ohio EPA is identifying emissions projections for 2015 and 2025 

for EGUs with implementation of the CAIR program. U.S. EPA 

has raised concerns regarding the CAIR program and its 

remand. However, Ohio EPA believes these are the most 

appropriate and accurate future projections. Although CSAPR 

has been stayed by the D.C. Circuit Court (December 30, 2011), 

the Court has ordered U.S. EPA to continue administering CAIR 

pending the court’s resolution. It is believed that CSAPR will 

provide even greater reductions in emissions than the CAIR 

program once resolved; therefore, these emissions projections 

will be conservative. 

On March 10, 2004, the U.S. EPA promulgated the CAIR. 

Beginning in 2009, U.S. EPA’s CAIR rule requires EGUs in 28 

eastern states and the District of Columbia to significantly 

reduce emissions of NOx and SO2. CAIR replaced the NOx SIP 

Call for EGUs. The intent of the CAIR program is for national 

 

10 http://www.ladco.org/tech/emis/current/index.php 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 36
 29 

NOx emissions to be cut from 4.5 million tons in 2004, to a cap 

of 1.5 million tons by 2009, and 1.3 million tons in 2018 in 28 

states. States were required to submit a CAIR SIP as part of 

this effort. Ohio submitted a CAIR SIP which was approved by 

U.S. EPA on February 1, 2007. Revisions to the CAIR SIP were 

again submitted on July 15, 2009. The revised CAIR SIP was 

approved as a direct final action on September 25, 2009 (74 FR 

48857). As a result of CAIR, U.S. EPA projects that in 2009 

emissions of NOx will decrease from a baseline of 264,000 tons 

per year to 93,000 tons per year while in 2010 emissions of SO2

will decrease from a baseline of 1,373,000 tons per year to 

298,000 tons per year, within Ohio. And by 2015 U.S. EPA 

projects emissions of NOx will decrease to 83,000 tons per year 

while emissions of SO2 will decrease to 208,000 tons per year, 

within Ohio11. On December 23, 2008, U.S. EPA’s CAIR 

program was remanded without vacatur by the D.C. Circuit 

Court. 

As can be seen in Table 9 below, Ohio has seen a significant 

decline in the 264,000 tons of NOx and 1,373,000 tons of SO2

emitted in 2005. In 2008 and 2009 facilities began preparing for 

and implementing control programs to address CAIR12 and 

consent decrees. 

Table 10 - Reductions in SO2 and NOx EGU Emissions 

Between 2008 and 2009 

SO2 NOx

2008 2009 Change 2008 2009 Change 

Ohio 709,444 601,101 15% 235,018 96,351 59% 

LADCO States 2,019,036 1,620,071 20% 702,384 393,930 44% 

National 7,616,262 5,747,353 25% 2,996,287 1,990,385 34% 

Source: Clean Air Markets Quarterly Emissions Tracking13

Significant reductions also occurred regionally and nationally as 

can be seen from the above table. Data is also available for the 

first two quarters of 2010, the year SO2 reductions are to be 

implemented under CAIR: 

 

11 http://www.epa.gov/CAIR/oh.html 

12 Under CAIR, NOx reductions are to occur beginning in 2009 while SO2 reductions are to occur 

beginning in 2010.

13 http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/quarterlytracking.html

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 37
 30 

Table 11 – Reductions in SO2 and NOx EGU Emissions 

Between the First Half of 2008 and 2010 

SO2 NOx

2008 

 (1st half) 

2010 

(1st half) Change 2008 (1st half) 

2010 

(1st half) Change 

Ohio 373,798 279,854 25% 130,598 53,187 59% 

LADCO States 1,190,497 854,282 28% 419,114 220,907 47% 

National 3,895,472 2,502,965 36% 1,487,179 930,148 37% 

Source: Clean Air Markets Quarterly Emissions Tracking14

The following was reported by U.S. EPA’s Clean Markets 

Division: 

“Based on emissions monitoring data, EPA has observed 

substantial reductions in SO2 emissions from 2005 to 2009 and 

in the first two quarters of 2010 as companies installed more 

controls, electric demand declined, and low natural gas prices 

made combined-cycle gas-fired units more competitive in 

several parts of the country. Thus, even after CAIR's vacatur 

and subsequent remand in late 2008, the controls in place 

generally have continued to operate, helping to drive continued 

progress in reducing emissions.15” 

Ohio EPA is in agreement with the analysis by U.S.EPA that the 

CAIR program is providing real reductions at this time, Ohio 

believes these reductions have assisted with PM2.5 attainment in 

this nonattainment area and throughout Ohio. 

On July 6, 2011, U.S. EPA finalized a replacement to the CAIR 

program, the CSAPR. CSAPR would preserve those initial 

reductions achieved under CAIR and provide even greater 

reductions in NOx and SO2 emissions in 2012 and 2014, ahead 

of the 2015 CAIR Phase 2. As a result of CSAPR, U.S. EPA 

projected that in 2012 emissions of NOx will decrease to 90,842 

tons per year and in 2014 to 85,744 tons per year while SO2 will 

decrease to 304,022 tons per year in 2012 and 134,333 tons 

per year in 2014, within Ohio. In addition, U.S. EPA projections 

indicated that as a result of implementation of CSAPR, there will 

be no maintenance issues within this entire nonattainment area. 

However, on December 30, 2011, the D.C. Circuit Court stayed 

CSAPR and ordered U.S. EPA to continue administering CAIR 

pending the court’s resolution. 

Therefore, it is Ohio EPA’s belief it is most appropriate to 

evaluate Ohio EPA’s demonstration that the projected level of 

 

14 http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/quarterlytracking.html

15 http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/background.htm

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 38
 31 

emissions is sufficient to maintain the 24-hour PM2.5 standard by 

assessing future year emissions that include the CAIR program. 

The detailed inventory information for the Ohio portion of the 

Steubenville-Weirton area for 2005 is in Appendix B. Emission 

trends are an important gauge for continued compliance with 

the PM2.5 standard. Therefore, Ohio EPA performed an initial 

comparison of the inventories for the base year and 

maintenance years. Mobile source emission inventories are 

described in Appendix C. 

Sectors included in the following tables are: Electrical 

Generating Unit (EGU-Point); Non-Electrical Generating Unit 

(Non-EGU); Non-road Mobile (Non-road); Other Area (Area); 

Marine, Aircraft, Rail (MAR); and On-road Mobile (On-road). 

Maintenance is demonstrated when the future-year (2025) 

projected emission totals are below the 2008 attainment year 

totals. 

Demonstration

PM2.5 

The 2005 and 2008 actual PM2.5 emissions data below generally 

contains particulate fraction emissions only and not the condensable 

fractions as Ohio EPA did not have a consistent reporting requirement 

during those years. U.S. EPA IPM modeling was used to generate 

future year EGU emissions with the CAIR program. The IPM modeling 

added additional PM2.5 condensable emissions into future years. 

Therefore, comparing base and attainment year emissions with the 

future year predictions is not accurate in the IPM CAIR modeling. This 

step leads to a false perception of significant PM2.5 emissions growth. 

Modeling performed by LADCO, without CAIR, did not incorporate 

added condensable fraction emissions. Although Ohio EPA has stated 

that it is most appropriate to evaluate future year emissions that 

include the CAIR program, because of this flaw it will be more accurate 

and appropriate for the purposes of PM2.5 to evaluate future year 

emissions without the CAIR program. 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 39
 32 

Table 12 - Jefferson County, Ohio PM2.5 Emission Inventory 

Totals for Base Year 2005, Estimated 2008, and 

Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – Without CAIR

Sector 2005 Base 2008 

Attainment 

2015 

Interim 

2025 

Maintenance 

Safety 

Margin 

EGU Point 1,307.90 1,372.80 1,405.39 1,449.64 -76.84 

Non-EGU 461.57 461.42 437.63 413.69 47.73 

Non-road 24.30 22.50 17.15 11.25 11.25 

Area 110.12 110.60 108.49 105.97 4.63 

MAR 8.07 7.25 4.50 0.68 6.57 

On-road 73.17 60.97 31.88 16.49 44.48 

TOTAL 1,985.13 2,035.54 2,005.04 1,997.72 37.82 

Table 13 - Brooke County, West Virginia PM2.5 Emission 

Inventory Totals for Base Year 2005, Estimated 2008, 

and Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CSAPR 

Sector 2005 Base 2008 

Attainment 

2015 

Interim 

2025 

Maintenance 

Safety 

Margin 

EGU Point 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

Non-EGU 155.12 166.68 155.84 141.59 25.09 

Non-road 11.04 9.46 6.47 3.76 5.70 

Area 208.48 219.93 217.55 216.00 3.93 

MAR 17.07 3.85 3.87 3.91 -0.06 

On-road 19.41 14.42 6.97 4.34 10.08 

TOTAL 411.12 414.34 390.70 369.60 44.74 

Table 14 - Hancock County, West Virginia PM2.5 Emission 

Inventory Totals for Base Year 2005, Estimated 2008, 

and Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CSAPR 

Sector 2005 Base 2008 

Attainment 

2015 

Interim 

2025 

Maintenance 

Safety 

Margin 

EGU Point 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

Non-EGU 182.02 90.97 83.84 74.81 16.16 

Non-road 9.61 8.20 5.57 3.10 5.10 

Area 313.70 232.96 230.26 229.92 3.04 

MAR 26.18 18.46 18.58 18.75 -0.29 

On-road 18.63 13.51 6.53 4.10 9.41 

TOTAL 550.14 364.10 344.78 330.68 33.42 

 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 40
 33 

Table 15 – Steubenville-Weirton Area PM2.5 Emission Inventory 

Totals for Base Year 2005, Estimated 2008, and 

projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – Without CAIR (Ohio) 

and With CSAPR (West Virginia) 

PM2.5 2005 Base 2008 

Attainment 

2015 

Interim 

2025 

Maintenance 

Safety 

Margin 

Jefferson 1,985.13 2,035.54 2,005.04 1,997.72 37.82

Hancock, WV 550.14 364.10 344.78 330.68 33.42

Brooke, WV 411.12 414.34 390.70 369.60 44.74

COMBINED 

PM2.5 TOTAL 2,946.39 2,813.98 2,740.52 2,698.00 115.98

NOx 

Table 16 - Jefferson County, Ohio NOx Emission Inventory Totals 

for Base Year 2005, Estimated 2008, and Projected 

2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CAIR 

Sector 2005 

Base 

2008 

Attainment 2015 Interim 2025 Maintenance

Safety 

Margin 

EGU Point 41,046.61 35,486.86 19,488.27 12,631.73 22,855.13 

Non-EGU 1,991.85 1,991.96 1,938.71 1,863.75 128.21 

Non-road 234.30 207.68 131.49 96.59 111.09 

Area 251.38 253.45 252.46 251.93 1.52 

MAR 317.3 300.96 202.51 70.94 230.02 

On-road 2,105.85 1,758.04 870.17 322.71 1,435.33 

TOTAL 45,947.29 39,998.95 22,883.61 15,237.65 24,761.30 

Table 17 - Brooke County, West Virginia NOx Emission Inventory 

Totals for Base Year 2005, Estimated 2008, and 

Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CSAPR 

Sector 2005 Base 2008 

Attainment 

2015 

Interim 

2025 

Maintenance

Safety 

Margin 

EGU Point 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

Non-EGU 692.76 789.79 742.21 679.29 110.50 

Non-road 204.75 169.37 88.18 59.17 110.20 

Area 311.36 119.10 117.87 116.12 2.98 

MAR 444.99 112.83 113.54 114.56 -1.73 

On-road 540.40 412.02 174.71 62.47 349.55 

TOTAL 2,194.26 1,603.11 1,236.51 1,031.61 571.50 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 41
 34 

Table 18 - Hancock County, West Virginia NOx Emission Inventory 

Totals for Base Year 2005, Estimated 2008, and 

Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CSAPR 

Sector 2005 Base 2008 

Attainment 

2015 

Interim 

2025 

Maintenance

Safety 

Margin 

EGU Point 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

Non-EGU 1,181.15 574.68 524.80 462.67 112.01 

Non-road 135.47 119.41 74.58 51.49 67.92 

Area 1,446.78 158.02 156.60 154.58 3.44 

MAR 695.36 534.89 538.26 543.08 -8.19 

On-road 482.75 360.25 149.00 52.09 308.16 

TOTAL 3,941.51 1,747.25 1,443.24 1,263.91 483.34 

 

Table 19 - Steubenville-Weirton Area NOx Emission Inventory 

Totals for Base Year 2005, Estimated 2008, and 

Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CAIR (Ohio) and 

With CSAPR (West Virginia) 

NOx 2005 

Base 

2008 

Attainment 

2015 

Interim 

2025 

Maintenance

Safety 

Margin 

Jefferson 45,947.29 39,998.95 22,883.61 15,237.65 24,761.30

Hancock, WV 3,941.51 1,747.25 1,443.24 1,263.91 483.34

Brooke, WV 2,194.26 1,603.11 1,236.51 1,031.61 571.50

COMBINED 

NOx TOTAL 52,083.06 43,349.31 25,563.36 17,533.17 25,816.14

SO2

Table 20 - Jefferson County, Ohio SO2 Emission Inventory Totals 

for Base Year 2005, Estimated 2008, and Projected 

2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CAIR

Sector 2005 Base 2008 

Attainment 

2015 

Interim 

2025 

Maintenance

Safety 

Margin 

EGU Point 225,594.94 135,506.74 72,203.22 45,073.14 90,433.60 

Non-EGU 849.92 782.87 757.91 692.85 90.02 

Non-road 17.31 3.09 0.40 0.45 2.64 

Area 110.89 109.15 101.75 91.69 17.46 

MAR 26.16 21.61 13.04 0.48 21.13 

On-road 18.18 5.65 3.93 3.56 2.09 

TOTAL 226,617.40 136,429.11 73,080.25 45,862.17 90,566.94 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 42
 35 

Table 21 - Brooke County, West Virginia SO2 Emission Inventory 

Totals for Base Year 2005, Estimated 2008, and 

Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CSAPR 

Sector 2005 Base 2008 

Attainment 

2015 

Interim 

2025 

Maintenance

Safety 

Margin 

EGU Point 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

Non-EGU 620.55 766.54 718.43 654.91 111.63 

Non-road 12.13 2.17 0.27 0.30 1.87 

Area 167.98 163.76 156.62 146.42 17.34 

MAR 20.32 6.34 6.38 6.44 -0.10 

On-road 7.01 2.11 1.51 1.26 0.85 

TOTAL 827.99 940.92 883.21 809.33 131.59 

Table 22 - Hancock County, West Virginia SO2 Emission Inventory 

Totals for Base Year 2005, Estimated 2008, and 

Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CSAPR 

Sector 2005 Base 2008 

Attainment 

2015 

Interim 

2025 

Maintenance

Safety 

Margin 

EGU Point 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

Non-EGU 1,480.85 613.04 572.55 519.57 93.47 

Non-road 9.72 1.73 0.21 0.23 1.50 

Area 728.92 248.63 237.35 221.22 27.41 

MAR 32.27 31.47 31.67 31.96 -0.49 

On-road 6.58 1.92 1.36 1.10 0.82 

TOTAL 2,258.34 896.79 843.14 774.08 122.71 

 

Table 23 - Steubenville-Weirton Area SO2 Emission Inventory 

Totals for Base Year 2005, Estimated 2008, and 

Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CAIR (Ohio) and 

With CSAPR (West Virginia) 

SO2 2005 Base 2008 

Attainment 

2015 

Interim 

2025 

Maintenance 

Safety 

Margin 

Jefferson 226,617.40 136,429.11 73,080.25 45,862.17 90,566.94

Hancock, WV 2,258.34 896.79 843.14 774.08 122.71

Brooke, WV 827.99 940.92 883.21 809.33 131.59

COMBINED 

SO2 TOTAL 229,703.73 138,266.82 74,806.60 47,445.58 90,821.24

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 43
 36 

PM2.5, NOx, and SO2

Table 24 - Steubenville-Weirton Area Comparison of 2008 

Attainment Year and 2015 and 2025 Projected 

Emission Estimates (tpy) 

 

2008 Base 2015 

Interim 

2015 

Projected 

Decrease 

2025 

Maintenance

2025 

Projected 

Decrease 

PM2.5 2,813.98 2,740.52 73.46 2,698.00 115.98

NOx 43,349.31 25,563.36 17,785.95 17,533.17 25,816.14

SO2 138,266.82 74,806.60 63,460.22 47,445.58 90,821.24

 

As shown in the table above (Table 23), PM2.5 emissions in the 

nonattainment area are projected to decrease by 73.46 tpy in 

2015 and 115.98 tpy in 2025. NOx emissions in the 

nonattainment area are projected to decrease by 17,785.95 tpy 

in 2015 and 25,816.14 tpy in 2025. SO2 emissions in the 

nonattainment area are projected to decline by 63,460.22 tpy in 

2015 and 90,821.24 tpy in 2025. 

In general, EGU source emissions, and to a lesser extent, area 

source emissions and Non-EGU source emissions show a 

decrease. Cleaner vehicles and fuels are expected to be in 

place in 2009 and 2018, and the CSAPR will be implemented in 

2012 and 2014 and these programs should cause an overall 

drop in all three pollutants emissions. Decreases from U.S. EPA 

rules covering EGUs, Tier 2 Motor Vehicle Emissions Standards 

and Gasoline Sulfur Control Requirements16, Highway HeavyDuty Engine Rule17, and the Non-Road Diesel Engine Rule18 are 

factored into the changes. 

In addition to the above, the Cardinal Station (AEP) in 

Jefferson County implemented changes in late 2007 and early 

2008. Two units, #1 and #2 (each 600 megawatt) installed and 

began continuously operating scrubbers, and a restricted SO2

allowable emission rate was incorporated into a federally 

enforceable permit demonstrating they will not cause or 

contribute to a violation of a NAAQS and/or Prevention of 

Significant Deterioration increment violation based upon air 

dispersion modeling. These scrubbers began operating in 

December 2007 and March 2008.19 Also these two units were 

required by a federally enforceable consent decree to operate 

 

16 http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2000/February/Day-10/a19a.htm 

17 http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/1997/October/Day-21/a27494.htm 

18 http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/1998/October/Day-23/a24836.htm 

19 The lower rates will be incorporated into the facility’s Title V operating permit at renewal.

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 44
 37 

their SNCR continuously to control and reduce NOx emissions 

by January 2009. Moreover, unit #3 (630 megawatt) is 

undergoing construction for the installation of a scrubber, to 

control SO2 emissions in the future. The permit-to-install these 

scrubbers will require a restricted SO2 allowable emission rate. 

The scrubbers will begin operating by January 2012 in 

accordance with their federally enforceable consent decree. 

Similar to unit #1 and #2, unit #3 was required by a federally 

enforceable consent decree to operate SNCR continuously to 

control and reduce NOx emissions by January 2009. 

Requirement 4 of 5 

A demonstration that improvement in air quality between the year violations 

occurred and the year attainment was achieved is based on permanent and 

enforceable emission reductions and not on temporary adverse economic 

conditions or unusually favorable meteorology. 

Background 

Ambient air quality data from all monitoring sites indicate that air 

quality met the NAAQS for PM2.5 in 2008-2010. U.S. EPA’s 

redesignation guidance (p 9) states: “A state may generally 

demonstrate maintenance of the NAAQS by either showing that future 

emissions of a pollutant or its precursors will not exceed the level of 

the attainment inventory, or by modeling to show that the future mix of 

sources and emissions rates will not cause a violation of the NAAQS.” 

Demonstration 

Permanent and enforceable reductions of PM2.5, NOx, and SO2

emissions have contributed to the attainment of the 24-hour PM2.5

standard. Some of these reductions were realized due to the 

application of tighter federal standards on non-road diesel vehicles 

(Clean Air Non-road Diesel Rule) and the application of tighter federal 

standards on new vehicles. Also Title IV of the CAA, the NOx SIP Call, 

CAIR, and federal consent decrees required the reductions of SO2 and 

NOx emissions from utility sources. Reductions achieved are 

discussed in greater detail under Chapter Five. 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 45
 38 

Table 25 - Steubenville-Weirton Area Comparison of 2005 Base 

Year and 2008 Attainment Year On-Road, Non-Road 

and EGU Reductions 

2005 2008 

On-road PM2.5 111.21 88.90

On-road NOx 3,129.00 2,530.31

On-road SO2 31.77 9.68

Non-road PM2.5 44.95 40.16

Non-road NOx 574.51 496.47

Non-road SO2 39.16 6.99

EGU PM2.5 1,307.90 1,372.80

EGU NOx 41,046.61 35,486.86

EGU SO2 225,594.94 135,506.74

Requirement 5 of 5 

Provisions for future annual updates of the inventory to enable tracking of the 

emission levels, including an annual emission statement from major sources. 

Demonstration

In Ohio, major point sources in all counties are required to 

submit air emissions information annually, in accordance with 

U.S. EPA’s Consolidated Emissions Reporting Rule (CERR). 

Ohio EPA prepares a new periodic inventory for all PM2.5

precursor emission sectors every three years. These PM2.5

precursor inventories will be prepared for future years as 

necessary to comply with the inventory reporting requirements 

established in the CFR. Emissions information will be compared 

to the 2005 base year and the 2025 projected maintenance year 

inventories to assess emission trends, as necessary, and to 

assure continued compliance with the 24-hour PM2.5 standard. 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 46
 39 

CHAPTER FIVE 

CONTROL MEASURES AND REGULATIONS

CAA Section107 (d)(3)(E)(ii), 107(d)(3)(iv), and 107(d)(3)(E)(v) 

Requirement 1 of 6

Section 172(c)(1) of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments requires states with 

nonattainment areas to implement RACM and RACT. 

Background

Section 172(c)(1) of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments 

requires states with nonattainment areas to submit a SIP 

providing for implementation of all reasonably available control 

measures and as expeditiously as practicable (including such 

reductions in emissions from existing sources in the area as 

may be obtained through the adoption, at a minimum, of 

reasonable available control technology). 

U.S. EPA’s 1997 Implementation Rule interprets this 

requirement in great detail. Under U.S. EPA’s approach, RACT 

is determined as part of the broader RACM analysis and 

identification of all measures (for stationary, mobile, and area 

sources) that are technically and economically feasible, and that 

would collectively contribute to advancing the attainment date 

(i.e. by one year or more). States are required to use a 

combined approach to RACT and RACM, that (1) identifies 

potential measures that are reasonable, (2) uses modeling to 

identify the attainment date that is as expeditious as practicable, 

and (3) selects the appropriate RACT and RACM. 

The 1997 Implementation Rule also provides for a presumption 

that in States that fulfill their CAIR emission reduction 

requirements, EGU compliance with CAIR is equivalent to 

RACM/RACT. 

Demonstration

In 1972, 1980, and 1991, Ohio promulgated rules requiring 

reasonably available controls measures for particulate 

emissions from stationary sources. 

Statewide RACT rules have been applied to all new sources 

locating in Ohio since that time. RACT requirements are 

incorporated into permits along with monitoring, recordkeeping, 

and reporting necessary to ensure ongoing compliance. Ohio 

EPA also has an active enforcement program to address 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 47
 40 

violations discovered by field office staff. The Ohio RACT rules 

for particulate matter are found in OAC Chapter 3745-1720. 

In addition, Ohio EPA promulgated NOx SIP Call rules (OAC 

Chapter 3745-1421), CAIR (OAC Chapter 3745-10922), and NOx

Reasonably Available Control Technology rules (OAC Chapter 

3745-11023) over the past five years. Emissions from EGUs 

make up a significant contribution to Ohio’s inventory. Beginning 

in 2009, Ohio implemented CAIR which has, and will, provide 

for significant reductions in NOx, PM2.5, and SO2 until such time 

CSAPR is implemented. Then the CSAPR will provide for even 

greater reductions. 

As part of a larger initiative, LADCO, in consultation with two 

contractors, performed a series of studies exploring control 

measures for reducing both ozone precursors and PM2.5 

precursors in Ohio, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, and Wisconsin 

area. The first consultant, MACTEC, prepared a series of white 

papers24 researching different stationary source categories. The 

results were compiled into two reports25. The second consultant, 

Environ, investigated control options for mobile sources. The 

results were compiled into two reports26. The stationary and 

mobile source sectors (and associated control measures) were 

selected by the LADCO States based on several factors 

presented in the report (See Chapter 2). 

Photochemical modeling was then conducted (as part of 

LADCO Round 4 modeling) to assess the air quality benefit of 

the candidate control measures and a modeling report was 

developed27. Based on the results, the LADCO project team felt 

it would not be possible to advance the attainment date for 

PM2.5. Ohio EPA, in its attainment demonstration submitted on 

July 18, 2008, demonstrated (using a weight of evidence 

 

20 http://www.epa.ohio.gov/dapc/regs/3745_17.aspx 

21 http://www.epa.ohio.gov/dapc/regs/3745_14.aspx 

22 http://www.epa.ohio.gov/dapc/regs/3745_109.aspx 

23 http://www.epa.ohio.gov/dapc/regs/3745_110.aspx

24 http://www.ladco.org/reports/control/white_papers 

25 

http://www.ladco.org/reports/control/final_reports/identification_and_evaluation_of_candidate_control_m

easures_i_april_2005.pdf; 

http://www.ladco.org/reports/control/final_reports/identification_and_evaluation_of_candidate_control_m

easures_ii_june_2006.pdf 

26

http://www.ladco.org/reports/control/final_reports/final_report_evaluation_of_candidate_mobile_source_

control_measures_february_2006.pdf; 

http://www.ladco.org/reports/control/final_reports/final_report_evaluation_of_candidate_mobile_source_

control_measures_for_ladco_states_in_2009_and_2012_march_2007.pdf

27 http://www.ladco.org/reports/control/modeling/round4_modeling.pdf

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 48
 41 

approach) that attainment would be achieved in this area by 

2009. Because of a projected 2009 attainment date, it would not 

have been reasonably possible or practicable for Ohio to 

develop RACT/RACM requirements, promulgate regulations 

and implement a control program prior to the projected 

attainment date. 

Requirement 2 of 6

Section 172(c)(2) of the 1990 CAA Amendments requires attainment 

demonstration SIPs for nonattainment areas to show reasonable further 

progress (RFP). 

Background

U.S. EPA’s 1997 Implementation Rule requires RFP only for 

any area which a State projects an attainment date beyond 

2014. If a State demonstrates attainment will occur by 2014 or 

earlier, U.S. EPA considers the attainment demonstration to 

demonstrate achievement of RFP. However, if a State attains 

the standard prior to the requirement to submit an attainment 

demonstration, 2012, an attainment demonstration is not 

required. 

Demonstration

The Steubenville-Weirton area has attained the standard prior to 

the deadline for submitting an attainment demonstration; and 

therefore, it was not necessary to submit a separate RFP plan. 

Requirement 3 of 6

Section 172(c)(3) requires states to submit a comprehensive inventory of 

actual emissions. 

Background

Section 172(c)(3) requires states to submit a comprehensive 

inventory of actual emissions in the area, including the 

requirement for periodic revisions as determined necessary. 40 

CFR 51.1008 requires such inventory to be submitted within 

three years of designation and requires a baseline emission 

inventory for calendar year 2005 or other suitable year to be 

used for attainment planning. 

Demonstration

The 2005 comprehensive inventory was submitted to U.S. EPA 

with Ohio’s PM2.5 attainment demonstration SIP submitted on 

July 18, 2008. It was then subsequently revised and 

resubmitted on June 7, 2010. 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 49
 42 

Ohio also updates its inventory in accordance with U.S. EPA’s 

CERR rule (i.e. emissions statements). Ohio EPA submitted its 

emissions statement SIP on March 18, 1994 which was 

approved by U.S. EPA on October 13, 1995 (59 FR 51863). As 

discussed in Chapter 4 (Requirement 4), Ohio EPA submits, 

and commits to submit, emission inventories (statements) every 

three years. 

Requirement 4 of 6

Evidence that control measures required in past PM2.5 SIP revisions have 

been fully implemented. 

Background

In addition to the historic RACT requirements for PM, the U.S. 

EPA NOx SIP Call required 22 states to pass rules that would 

result in significant emission reductions from large EGUs, 

industrial boilers, and cement kilns in the eastern United States. 

Ohio passed this rule in 2001. NOx SIP Call requirements are 

incorporated into permits along with monitoring, recordkeeping, 

and reporting necessary to ensure ongoing compliance. Ohio 

EPA also has an active enforcement program to address 

violations discovered by field office staff. Compliance is tracked 

through the Clean Air Markets data monitoring program. 

Beginning in 2004, this rule accounts for a reduction of 

approximately 31 percent of all NOx emissions statewide 

compared to previous uncontrolled years. The other 21 states 

also have adopted these rules. 

On March 10, 2004, the U.S. EPA promulgated the CAIR. 

Beginning in 2009, U.S. EPA’s CAIR rule requires EGUs in 28 

eastern states and the District of Columbia to significantly 

reduce emissions of NOx and SO2. CAIR replaced the NOx SIP 

Call for EGUs. National NOx emissions will be cut from 4.5 

million tons in 2004, to a cap of 1.5 million tons by 2009, and 1.3 

million tons in 2018 in 28 states. States were required to submit 

a CAIR SIP as part of this effort. Ohio submitted a CAIR SIP 

which was approved by U.S. EPA on February 1, 2007. 

Revisions to the CAIR SIP were again submitted on July 15, 

2009. The revised CAIR SIP was approved as a direct final 

action on September 25, 2009 (74 FR 48857). 

Demonstration

Controls for EGUs under the NOx SIP Call formally commenced 

May 31, 2004. Emissions covered by this program have been 

generally trending downward since 1998 with larger reductions 

occurring in 2002 and 2003. Data taken from the U.S. EPA 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 50
 43 

Clean Air Markets web site, quantify the gradual NOx reductions 

that have occurred in Ohio as a result of Title IV of the 1990 

CAA Amendments and the beginning of the NOx SIP Call Rule. 

Ohio developed the NOx Budget Trading Program rules in OAC 

Chapter 3745-1428 in response to the SIP Call. OAC Chapter 

3745-14 regulates EGUs and certain non-EGUs under a cap 

and trade program based on an 85 percent reduction of NOx 

emissions from EGUs and a 60 percent reduction of NOx

emissions from non-EGUs, compared to historical levels. This 

cap was in place through 2008, at which time the CAIR program 

superseded it as discussed above. Requirement 3 of 5 under 

Chapter 4 above discussed the reductions Ohio has seen as a 

result of CAIR. 

On April 21, 2004, U.S. EPA published Phase II of the NOx SIP 

Call that establishes a budget for large (greater than 1 ton per 

day emissions) stationary internal combustion engines. Ohio 

EPA’s OAC rule 3745-14-12 addresses stationary internal 

combustion engines, all used in natural gas pipeline 

transmissions. U.S. EPA approved this revision to the SIP on 

April 4, 2008. An 82 percent NOx reduction from 1995 levels is 

anticipated. Completion of the compliance plan occurred by May 

1, 2006, and the compliance demonstration began May 1, 2007. 

Tier II Emission Standards for Vehicles and Gasoline Sulfur 

Standards 

In February 2000, U.S. EPA finalized a federal rule to 

significantly reduce emissions from cars and light trucks, 

including sport utility vehicles (SUVs). Under this proposal, 

automakers will be required to sell cleaner cars, and refineries 

will be required to make cleaner, lower sulfur gasoline. This rule 

will apply nationwide. The federal rules will phase in between 

2004 and 2009. U.S. EPA has estimated that NOx emission 

reductions will be approximately 77 percent for passenger cars, 

86 percent for smaller SUVs, light trucks, and minivans, and 65 

to 95 percent reductions for larger SUVs, vans, and heavier 

trucks. The sulfur content of gasoline is estimated to be 

reduced by up to 90 percent. VOC emission reductions will be 

approximately 12 percent for passenger cars, 18 percent for 

smaller SUVs, light trucks, and minivans, and 15 percent for 

larger SUVs, vans, and heavier trucks. 

 

28 http://www.epa.ohio.gov/dapc/regs/3745_14.aspx 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 51
 44 

Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines 

In July 2000, U.S. EPA issued a final rule for Highway Heavy 

Duty Engines, a program which includes low-sulfur diesel fuel 

standards, which will be phased in from 2004 through 2007. 

This rule applies to heavy-duty gasoline and diesel trucks and 

buses. This rule will result in a 40 percent reduction in NOx from 

diesel trucks and buses, a large sector of the mobile sources 

NOx inventory. It also estimated the level of sulfur in highway 

diesel fuel will be reduced by 97 percent by mid-2006. 

Clean Air Non-road Diesel Rule 

In May 2004, U.S. EPA issued the Clean Air Non-road Diesel 

Rule. This rule applies to diesel engines used in industries such 

as construction, agriculture, and mining. It also contains a 

cleaner fuel standard similar to the highway diesel program. 

The new standards will cut emissions from non-road diesel 

engines by more than 90 percent. Non-road diesel equipment, 

as described in this rule, currently accounts for 47 percent of 

diesel particulate matter (PM) and 25 percent of NOx from 

mobile sources nationwide. Sulfur levels will be reduced in nonroad diesel fuel by 99 percent from current levels, from 

approximately 3,000 parts per million (ppm) now to 15 ppm in 

2009. New engine standards take effect, based on engine 

horsepower, starting in 2008. Together, these rules will 

substantially reduce local and regional sources of PM2.5

precursors. 

Requirement 5 of 6

Acceptable provisions to provide for new source review. 

Background

Ohio has a longstanding and fully implemented New Source 

Review (NSR) program. This is addressed in OAC Chapter 

3745-3129. The Chapter includes provisions for the Prevention 

of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permitting program in OAC 

rules 3745-31-01 to 3745-31-20. Ohio's PSD program was 

conditionally approved on October 10, 2001 (66 FR 51570) and 

received final approval on January 22, 2003 (68FR 2909) by 

U.S. EPA as part of the SIP. 

Demonstration

Any facility that is not listed in the 2005 emission inventory, or 

for the closing of which credit was taken in demonstrating 

attainment, will not be allowed to construct, reopen, modify, or 

 

29 http://www.epa.ohio.gov/dapc/regs/3745_31.aspx 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 52
 45 

reconstruct without meeting all applicable NSR requirements. 

Once the area is redesignated, Ohio EPA will implement NSR 

through the PSD program. 

Requirement 6 of 6

Assure that all existing control measures will remain in effect after 

redesignation unless the State demonstrates through modeling that the 

standard can be maintained without one or more control measures. 

Demonstration

Ohio commits to maintaining the aforementioned control 

measures after redesignation. Ohio hereby commits that any 

changes to its rules or emission limits applicable to PM2.5, SO2, 

and NOx as required for maintenance of the 24-hour PM2.5

standard in the Steubenville-Weirton area, will be submitted to 

U.S. EPA for approval as a SIP revision. 

Ohio, through Ohio EPA’s Legal office, has the legal authority 

and necessary resources to actively enforce any violations of its 

rules or permit provisions. After redesignation, it intends to 

continue enforcing all rules that relate to the emission of PM2.5

precursors in the Steubenville-Weirton area. 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 53
 46 

CHAPTER SIX 

CONTINGENCY MEASURES 

CAA Section 107(d)(3)(E)(v) 

Requirement 1 of 4

A commitment to submit a revised plan eight years after redesignation. 

Demonstration

Ohio hereby commits to review its maintenance plan eight years 

after redesignation, as required by Section 175(A) of the CAA. 

Requirement 2 of 4

A commitment to expeditiously enact and implement additional contingency 

control measures in response to exceeding specified predetermined levels 

(triggers) or in the event that future violations of the ambient standard occur. 

Demonstration

Ohio hereby commits to adopt and expeditiously implement 

necessary corrective actions in the following circumstances: 

Warning Level Response: 

A warning level response shall be prompted whenever the 98th

percentile 24-hour PM2.5 concentration of 35.5 μg/m3 occurs in a 

single calendar year within the maintenance area. A warning 

level response will consist of a study to determine whether the 

PM2.5 value indicates a trend toward higher PM2.5 values or 

whether emissions appear to be increasing. The study will 

evaluate whether the trend, if any, is likely to continue and, if so, 

the control measures necessary to reverse the trend taking into 

consideration ease and timing for implementation as well as 

economic and social considerations. Implementation of 

necessary controls in response to a warning level response 

trigger will take place as expeditiously as possible, but in no 

event later than 12 months from the conclusion of the most 

recent calendar year. 

Should it be determined through the warning level study that 

action is necessary to reverse the noted trend, the procedures 

for control selection and implementation outlined under “action 

level response” shall be followed. 

Action Level Response: 

An action level response shall be prompted whenever a twoyear average of the 98th percentile 24-hour PM2.5 concentration 

of 35.0 μg/m3

 or greater occurs within the maintenance area. A 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 54
 47 

violation of the standard (three-year average of the 98th

percentile 24-hour PM2.5 concentration of 35.0 μg/m3 or greater) 

shall also prompt an action level response. In the event that the 

action level is triggered and is not found to be due to an 

exceptional event, malfunction, or noncompliance with a permit 

condition or rule requirement, Ohio EPA in conjunction with the 

metropolitan planning organization or regional council of 

governments, will determine additional control measures 

needed to assure future attainment of the NAAQS for 24-hour 

PM2.5. In this case, measures that can be implemented in a 

short time will be selected in order to be in place within 18 

months from the close of the calendar year that prompted the 

action level. Ohio EPA will also consider the timing of an action 

level trigger and determine if additional, significant new 

regulations not currently included as part of the maintenance 

provisions will be implemented in a timely manner and will 

constitute our response. 

 Control Measure Selection and Implementation 

Adoption of any additional control measures is subject to the 

necessary administrative and legal process. This process will 

include publication of notices, an opportunity for public hearing, 

and other measures required by Ohio law for rulemaking. 

If a new measure/control is already promulgated and scheduled 

to be implemented at the federal or State level, and that 

measure/control is determined to be sufficient to address the 

upward trend in air quality, additional local measures may be 

unnecessary. Furthermore, Ohio will submit to U.S. EPA an 

analysis to demonstrate the proposed measures are adequate 

to return the area to attainment. 

Requirement 3 of 4

A list of potential contingency measures that would be implemented in such 

an event. 

Demonstration

Contingency measures to be considered will be selected from a 

comprehensive list of measures deemed appropriate and 

effective at the time the selection is made. The selection of 

measures will be based on cost-effectiveness, emission 

reduction potential, economic and social considerations or other 

factors that Ohio EPA deems appropriate. Ohio EPA will solicit 

input from all interested and affected persons in the 

maintenance area prior to selecting appropriate contingency 

measures. Because it is not possible at this time to determine 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 55
 48 

what control measures will be appropriate at an unspecified time 

in the future, the list of contingency measures outlined below is 

not exhaustive. 

1) Diesel reduction emission strategies. 

2) Alternative fuel (e.g., liquid propane and compressed natural 

gas) and diesel retrofit programs for fleet vehicle operations. 

3) Tighter PM2.5, SO2, and NOx emissions offsets for new and 

modified major sources. 

4) Impact crushers located at recycle scrap yards – upgrade wet 

suppression. 

5) Concrete manufacturing – upgrade wet suppression. 

6) Additional NOx RACT statewide. 

No contingency measure shall be implemented without 

providing the opportunity for full public participation during which 

the relative costs and benefits of individual measures, at the 

time they are under consideration, can be fully evaluated. 

Requirement 4 of 4 

A list of PM2.5, SO2, and NOx sources potentially subject to future additional 

control requirements. 

Demonstration

The following is a list of PM2.5, SO2, and NOx sources potentially 

subject to future controls. 

• ICI Boilers - SO2 and NOx controls; 

• EGUs; 

• process heaters; 

• internal combustion engines; 

• combustion turbines; 

• other sources greater than 100 tons per year; 

• fleet vehicles; 

• concrete manufacturers; 

• aggregate processing plants; 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 56
 49 

CHAPTER SEVEN 

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

Ohio published notification for a public hearing and solicitation for public 

comment concerning the draft redesignation petition and maintenance plan in 

the widely distributed county publications. 

The public hearing to receive comments on the redesignation request was 

held on May 16, 2012, at the Steubenville Library – Schiappa Branch, 4141 

Mall Drive, Steubenville, Ohio. The public comment period closed on May 16, 

2012. Appendix F includes a copy of the public notice, comments received, 

and the transcript from the public hearing. 

 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 57
 50 

CHAPTER EIGHT 

CONCLUSIONS

The Steubenville-Weirton 24-hour PM2.5 nonattainment area has attained the 

2006 24-hour NAAQS for PM2.5 and complied with the applicable provisions of 

the 1990 Amendments to the CAA regarding redesignations of PM2.5 

nonattainment areas. Documentation to that effect is contained herein. Ohio 

EPA has prepared a redesignation request and maintenance plan that meet 

the requirements of Section 110 (a)(1) of the 1990 CAA. 

Based on this presentation, the Steubenville-Weirton 24-hour PM2.5 

nonattainment area meets the requirements for redesignation under the CAA 

and U.S. EPA guidance. Ohio has performed an analysis that shows the air 

quality improvements are due to permanent and enforceable measures. 

Furthermore, because this area is subject to significant transport of pollutants, 

significant regional SO2 and NOx reductions will ensure continued compliance 

(maintenance) with the standard with an increasing margin of safety. 

The State of Ohio hereby requests that the Steubenville-Weirton 24-hour 

PM2.5 nonattainment area be redesignated to attainment simultaneously with 

U.S. EPA approval of the maintenance plan provisions contained herein. 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 58
This page left intentionally blank

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 59
Appendix A

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 60
This page left intentionally blank

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 61
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

QUICKLOOK CRITERIA PARAMETERS

Report Request ID: 919382 Report Code: AMP450 Oct. 13, 2011

Selection Criteria Page 1

User ID: GYE

State County Site Parameter POC City AQCR UAR CBSA CSA

EPA

Region Method Duration Begin Date End Date

39

54

54

081

009

029

GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

PROTOCOL SELECTIONS

Parameter

Classification Parameter Method Duration

QUICK LOOK 88101

SELECTED OPTIONS

EVENTS PROCESSING

MERGE PDF FILES

WORKFILE DELIMITER

Option Type Option Value

EXCLUDE REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENTS

YES

,

SORT ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Order Column

PARAMETER_CODE

STATE_CODE

COUNTY_CODE

SITE_ID

POC

DATES

EDT_ID

GLOBAL DATES

2008

Start Date End Date

2010

Tribal

Code

APPLICABLE STANDARDS

Standard Description

PM25 24-hour 2006

PM25 Annual 2006

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 62
Oct. 13, 2011

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 1 of 6

EXCEPTIONAL DATA TYPES

EDT DESCRIPTION

0

1

2

5

NO EVENTS

EVENTS EXCLUDED

EVENTS INCLUDED

EVENTS WITH CONCURRENCE EXCLUDED

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 63
Oct. 13, 2011

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 2 of 6

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Ohio Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

39-081-0017

39-081-0017

39-081-0017

39-081-1001

39-081-1001

39-081-1001

39-081-1001

39-081-1001

39-081-1001

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

0809

0809

0809

0809

0809

0809

0809

0809

0809

Steubenville

Steubenville

Steubenville

Mingo 

Junction

Mingo 

Junction

Mingo 

Junction

Mingo 

Junction

Mingo 

Junction

Mingo 

Junction

Jefferson

Jefferson

Jefferson

Jefferson

Jefferson

Jefferson

Jefferson

Jefferson

Jefferson

618 LOGAN ST.

618 LOGAN ST.

618 LOGAN ST.

501 

COMMERICAL

501 

COMMERICAL

501 

COMMERICAL

501 

COMMERICAL

501 

COMMERICAL

501 

COMMERICAL

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

120

120

120

120

120

120

120

120

120

45.6

38.6

35.3

39.5

23.5

25.9

38.2

23.1

28.2

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

35.2

24.7

29.8

35.0

23.3

25.1

38.2

22.5

26.3

106

112

108

57

58

55

48

52

52

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

36.4

25.1

33.3

35.0

23.3

25.1

33.5

22.5

26.3

35.2

24.7

29.8

30.9

22.9

23.3

26.6

22.4

25.2

34.8

24.0

29.1

27.7

22.5

22.5

26.1

21.1

23.6

14.28*

12.11 

12.68 

14.05 

11.22 

12.64 

13.57*

10.69*

13.01*

WTD

ARITH

MEAN

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 64
Oct. 13, 2011

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 3 of 6

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) West Virginia Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

54-009-0005

54-009-0005

54-009-0005

54-009-0011

54-009-0011

54-009-0011

54-009-0011

54-009-0011

54-009-0011

54-029-1004

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

1

1150

1150

1150

1150

1150

1150

1150

1150

1150

1150

Follansbee

Follansbee

Follansbee

Weirton

Weirton

Weirton

Weirton

Weirton

Weirton

Weirton

Brooke

Brooke

Brooke

Brooke

Brooke

Brooke

Brooke

Brooke

Brooke

Hancock

FOLLANSBEE - 

MAHAN LANE

FOLLANSBEE - 

MAHAN LANE

FOLLANSBEE - 

MAHAN LANE

WEIRTON - 

MARLAND 

HEIGHTS 

ELEMENTARY

WEIRTON - 

MARLAND 

HEIGHTS 

ELEMENTARY

WEIRTON - 

MARLAND 

HEIGHTS 

ELEMENTARY

WEIRTON - 

MARLAND 

HEIGHTS 

ELEMENTARY

WEIRTON - 

MARLAND 

HEIGHTS 

ELEMENTARY

WEIRTON - 

MARLAND 

HEIGHTS 

ELEMENTARY

WEIRTON - OAK

ST AND OWINGS

ST (BETWEEN 

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

145

145

145

145

145

145

145

145

145

145

39.8

38.3

32.6

37.4

48.6

38.0

38.4

48.4

37.6

39.4

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

38.9

23.2

29.8

34.9

26.3

31.6

38.4

48.4

37.6

35.8

117

122

122

121

118

122

29

32

29

119

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

39.5

24.4

32.0

35.9

29.3

36.3

37.5

25.7

30.0

37.3

38.9

23.2

29.8

34.9

26.3

31.6

34.7

25.0

29.2

35.8

35.6

23.1

29.7

34.5

24.7

30.8

31.4

19.2

21.5

30.9

14.68 

12.15 

14.14 

13.79 

11.88 

13.48 

15.48 

11.86 

14.37 

13.33 

WTD

ARITH

MEAN

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 65
Oct. 13, 2011

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 4 of 6

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) West Virginia Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

54-029-1004

54-029-1004

1

1

1150

1150

Weirton

Weirton

Hancock

Hancock

DEAD ENDS)

WEIRTON - OAK

ST AND OWINGS

ST (BETWEEN 

DEAD ENDS)

WEIRTON - OAK

ST AND OWINGS

ST (BETWEEN 

DEAD ENDS)

2009

2010

145

145

29.6

34.4

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

25.2

31.2

122

122

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

28.7

33.1

25.2

31.2

22.9

30.7

11.25 

12.58 

WTD

ARITH

MEAN

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 66
Oct. 13, 2011

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 5 of 6

88101

88101

120

145

Andersen RAAS2.5-300 PM2.5 SEQ w/WINS

R & P Model 2025 PM-2.5 Sequential Air Sampler

GRAVIMETRIC

Gravimetric

PARAMETER

METHOD

CODE COLLECTION METHOD ANALYSIS METHOD

METHODS USED IN THIS REPORT

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 67
Oct. 13, 2011

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 6 of 6

PQAOS USED IN THIS REPORT

PQAO AGENCY DESCRIPTION

0809

1150

Ohio EPA, Southeast District Office

West Virginia Air Pollution Control Commission

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 68
Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 69
Appendix B

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 70
This page left intentionally blank

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 71
1

OHIO 

2005 Base Year PM2.5 SIP Inventory 

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency 

Lazarus Government Center 

50 West Town Street, Suite 700 

Columbus Ohio 43215 

Prepared by Ohio EPA 

Division of Air Pollution Control 

Emissions Inventory Unit 

February 2008 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 72
2

Table of Contents 

Section Page

 Introduction ................................................................................................. 3 

1.0 Point Sources ............................................................................................. 4 

 

2.0 Area Sources .............................................................................................. 8 

3.0 Non Road Sources........................................................................15 

4.0 On Road Sources........................................................................................17 

5.0 MAR Sources..............................................................................43 

 

Table 

2-1 Categories included in the 2005 area source Inventory.............................8

2-2 Emission Factors used for Wood Burners included in area sources............11 

3-1 NMIM NCD Tables for Specific Years and States ........................................... 16

4-1 Federal Functional Class Categories............................................................23 

4-2 DVMT Summary by County.................................................................. .24 

4-3 Speed by Federal Functional Class .............................................................28

4-4 Link Group Codes & Associated BPR Curves .......................................... 29 

4-5 Mobile6 Inputs.................................................................................31 

4-6 LADCO Data Output............................................. .............39

4-7 County Summary Table of MPOs by County......................................... .40 

5-1 Number of operations and LTOs for 2005.............................................. 45 

5-2 EDMS Aircraft Emissions ..................................................................50 

5-3 Fleet Emission Factor Categories ........................................................51 

5-4 Pollutant by County (Sample) ............................................................. 54 

. 

Figure

1........................................ Speed Comparison Graphs.....................................27 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 73
3

2005 Base Year PM2.5 SIP Inventory for Ohio 

Introduction 

The State of Ohio has a number of counties with air quality data showing nonattainment for the following PM2.5 standard: 

• Annual Standard = 15.0 ug/m3 

The Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) requires all states to revise and submit State 

Implementation Plans (SIP) for areas which are classified as non-attainment of the 1997 

Fine Particle (PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The Federal 

Register ( Vol. 72, No. 79/ Wednesday, April 25, 2007) provides the emissions inventory 

rules and regulations for the PM2.5 Clean Air Fine Particle implementation rule. An 

electronic version of the document can be found at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPAAIR/2007/April/Day-25/a6347.pdf. 

As part of the designation of non-attainment areas for PM2.5 standards, a new 

attainment demonstration SIP will be necessary. A key element in the overall SIP 

planning process is the need for an updated emissions inventory. This document 

presents the 2005 Base Year Particulate SIP Emissions Inventory for Ohio as required 

by the CAAA. It includes emissions for point, area, on-road mobile and non-road mobile 

for the State of Ohio. 

This technical report documents the procedures and the methodologies that were used 

in the development of daily emissions for all counties in Ohio. This report describes the 

following: 

1. Identification of stationary and mobile sources included in the 

inventory; 

2. Sources of data, and data collection methods used in the development 

of the inventory; 

3. Methods and procedures used to estimate emissions; and 

4. Assumptions considered in the development of the emissions 

inventories. 

The intent of this report is to describe how the inventory was prepared, and what 

information was considered in the inventory development. 

This document is comprised of 5 sections, one section for each inventory type. The 

biogenic inventory is not being discussed in this document because Ohio EPA did not 

participate in the generation of this inventory. Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium 

(LADCO) ran EPA’s BEIS model in the Emission Modeling System (EMS) to generate 

Summer Weekday emissions for VOC and NOx. 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 74
4

SECTION 1

POINT SOURCES 

Emissions and source specific data for point sources are collected for the 2005 baseyear SIP inventory by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA.) The 

primary source of data for point sources is facility reported STARShip files. STARShip 

is a software package developed by Ohio EPA, Division of Air Pollution Control (DAPC), 

to assist the regulated community in preparing and submitting a variety of electronic 

permit applications and reports to the DAPC. These data are reported by the Title V 

facilities annually as part of the emissions fee/inventory process conducted by Ohio 

EPA and include emissions, process rates, operating schedules, emissions control data 

and other relevant information. 

The STARShip files are electronically transferred to the DAPC and stored into the 

Division’s Oracle database, STARS. The files are reviewed by the local air agencies 

and Ohio EPA district and central office staff. After review, the data are imported into 

Excel and linked with an Access® database to further process the information into the 

federally approved National Emission Inventory (NEI) database format in version 3.0. 

The files are quality assured again using the United States Environmental Protection 

Agency’s (U.S.EPA) QA/QC software for format and content. The data is finally 

submitted to LADCO for emissions processing through the Emissions Modeling System. 

The State provided inventory for Electric Generating Units (EGU) is replaced with the 

Federal EGU inventory. The EGU inventory is compiled by U.S. EPA’s Acid Rain 

Program. It is based on facility reported emissions as measured by continuous 

emissions monitors. In conclusion, the final point source inventory is a hybrid of the 

federal EGU inventory and the state provided non-EGU units. 

A major distinction typically made in emissions inventories is that between point and 

area sources. In this inventory, point sources are sources for which individual records 

are maintained for that source. Such records are maintained for all Ohio Title V facilities 

(706 facilities statewide). The area source inventory accounts for facilities from nonTitle V facilities and calculates emissions information using surrogate emissions factors 

based on energy usage, population, employment records, or other reliable data. A 

more detailed discussion of the area source inventory is provided in Section 2. The 

point source inventory described herein is considered to be the most current and 

accurate source of emissions data available for 2005. 

1.1 Point Source Process Emissions 

Ohio EPA defines point source process emissions as those which occur at an 

identifiable Title V stationary stack or vent. Point source emissions not emitted from 

discrete stacks or vents are termed fugitive emissions and are discussed in Section 1.2. 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 75
5

1.1.1 Source Identification and Data Collection 

The sources to be included in the 2005 base year inventory are identified using the Title 

V STARS database. Facility production and emissions data are included in this 

database. This information is facility-reported actual 2005 emissions. 

1.1.2 Non-reactive VOC Emissions Adjustments 

This section is primarily applicable for VOC pollutants. Sources are required to identify 

emissions of photochemically non-reactive Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC.) Based 

upon this information, those emissions have been specifically excluded from the 2005 

base line inventory in accordance with U.S. EPA’s “Recommended Policy on the 

Control of Volatile Organic Compounds.” A complete list of the compounds that U.S. 

EPA has identified as being photochemically non-reactive, and therefore not included in 

the inventory, are listed below: 

• Methane 

• Ethane 

• Methylene chloride 

• Methyl chloroform 

• Trichlorofluoromethane (CFC-11) 

• Dichlorodifluoromethane (CFC-12) 

• Chlorodifluoromethane (CFC-22) 

• Trifluoromethane (HFC-23) 

• Chlorofluoromethance (HCFC-31) 

• Difluoromethane (HFC-32) 

• Decafluoropentane (HFC-43-10mee) 

• Ethylfluoride (HFC-161) 

• Trichlorotrifluoroethane (CFC-113) 

• Dichlorotetrafluoroethane (CFC-114) 

• Chloropentafluoroethane (CFC-115) 

• 2,2-Dichloro-1,1,1-trifluoroethane (HCFC-123) 

• 1,1,2-Trifluoroethane (HCFC-123a) 

• 2-Chloro-1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (HCFC-124) 

• Pentafluoroethane (HFC-125) 

• 1,1,2,2,-Tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134) 

• 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134a) 

• 1,1-Dichloro-1-fluoroethane (HCFC-141b) 

• 1-Chloro-1,1,-difluoroethane (HCFC-142b) 

• 1,1,1-Trifluoroethane (HFC-143a) 

• Fluoroethane (HCFC-151a) 

• 1,1-Difluoroethane (HFC-152a) 

• Pentafluoropropane (HFC-225ca) 

• Pentafluoropropane (HFC-225cb) 

• Hexafluoropropane (HFC-236ea) 

• Hexafluoropropane (HFC-236fa) 

• Pentafluoropropane (HFC-245ca) 

• Pentafluoropropane (HFC-245ea) 

• Pentafluoropropane (HFC-245eb) 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 76
6

• Pentafluoropropane (HFC-245fa) 

• Pentafluorobutane (HFC-365mfc) 

• Parachlorobenzotrifluoride (PCBTF) 

• Methoxybutane 

• Nonaflourobutane 

• Heptafluoropropane ((CF3)2CFCF2OCH3) 

• Heptafluoropropane ((CF3)CFCF2OC2H5) 

• Perchloroethylene 

• Cyclic, branched or linear completely methylated siloxanes 

• Methyl acetate 

• Volatile methyl siloxanes 

• Acetone 

1.1.3 Emissions Estimation Methodologies 

Since source reported actual annual emissions are used in the 2005 base year 

inventory, no estimation methods are necessary. The reports are provided to LADCO in 

National Emissions Inventory Input Format (NIF) 3.0 format. LADCO imported and 

processed the NIF files in EMS and applied temporal and spatial profiles to the annual 

emissions to calculate weekday emissions rates. The final point source inventory is 

split into two separate reports, the Electric Generating Units (EGU) which is the U.S. 

EPA inventory for electric generating units and the non-EGU which is the state inventory 

minus the EGU units. 

1.2 Point Source Fugitive Emissions 

Another type of emissions data which is required to be filed from point sources is 

fugitive emissions. Before 1990, fugitive emissions were categorized as area sources 

due to the lack of detailed information available for fugitive sources. However, since 

these emissions are now electronically reported in the State’s ORACLE database, 

STARS, these emissions can be classified as point sources. 

1.3 References 

Getting Started: Emissions Inventory Methods for PM2.5 U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, September, 1999. 

Emissions Inventory Guidance for Implementation of Ozone and Particulate Matter 

National Ambient Air Qaulity Standards (NAAQS) and Regional Haze Regulations, 

Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards Research, Triangle Park, NC. November 

2005. 

Compilation of Air Pollution Emission Factors, Fourth Edition and Supplements, AP-42. 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, September 1985. 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 77
7

Preparing 2002 Regional PM2.5 Emissions QAQPS PM Inventory Conference Inventory 

Conference San Diego, 2003. 

Documentation for the 2002 Electric Generating Unit National Emissions Inventory 

(NEI). Eastern research group, Inc., 1600 Perimeter Park Drive, Morrisville, NC 27560 

and E.H. Pechan and Associates, Inc., 5528–B Hempstead Way 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 78
8

SECTION 2 

AREA SOURCES 

Area sources are sources which are typically small, individual, numerous, and have not 

been inventoried as specific point, mobile, or biogenic sources. For inventory purposes, 

they are grouped with other like sources into categories that allow emissions to be 

calculated collectively using one methodology. Since area sources are traditionally 

defined at the county level, most methods are designed to estimate area source 

emissions at the county level. 

Ohio EPA has either used published Emission Inventory Improvement Program (EIIP)6

methodologies or selected other methodologies which are shared by other states. The 

decision of which methodology to use was largely based on Ohio’s data availability. 

Data which was not available on a county-level is estimated by assigning a percentage 

of the state’s total activity to each county based on the state’s population or employment 

information. If Ohio county specific activity data is available through Ohio EPA or other 

State Agencies, that data is used rather than allocating activity by percentage. Table 2-1 

lists the sources which emit PM2.5, NOx and SO2 along with the respective EFs used to 

calculate each pollutant. 

Table 2-1 Categories in the 2005 PM2.5 SIP Area Source inventory 

Area Source NOx PM2.5 SO2 Section 

Commercial Natural 

Gas Combustion 94 lb/MMSCF 7.6 lb/MMSCF 0.6 lb/MMSCF 2.1 

Industrial Distillate Oil 

Combustion 20 lb/E3gal fuel 0.25 lb/E3gal fuel 42.6 lb/E3gal fuel 2.2 

Industrial Residual Oil 

Combustion 55 lb/E3gal fuel 4.67 lb/E3gal fuel 157 lb/E3gal fuel 2.2 

Industrial Natural Gas 

Combustion 94 lb/MMSCF 7.6 lb/MMSCF 0.6 lb/MMSCF 2.2 

Residential Coal 

Combustion 9.1 Lb/Ton Coal 3.8 Lb/Ton Coal 31 Lb/Ton Coal 2.3 

Residential Distillate 

Oil Combustion 18 lb/E3gal fuel 0.83 lb/E3gal fuel 42.6 lb/E3gal fuel 2.3 

Residential Natural 

Gas Combustion 94 lb/MMSCF 7.6 lb/MMSCF 0.6 lb/MMSCF 2.3 

Residential LPG 

Combustion 13 lb/E3gal fuel 0.17 lb/E3gal fuel 0.1 lb/E3gal fuel 2.3 

Human Cremation 1.01E+01 lb/Ton 

cremated 

0.0637 lb/Ton 

cremated NA 2.4 

Structure Fires 1.4 Lb/Ton 

burned 

10.8 Lb/Ton 

burned NA 2.5 

Outdoor Wood Boilers 2.8 Lb/Ton 2.76E+1 Lb/Ton 4 E-1 Lb/Ton 2.6 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 79
9

Residential Wood 

Combustion 

Non-Certified 

Non-Catalytic 

Catalytic 

2.80E+00 lb/Ton 

2.80E+00 lb/Ton 

2.00E+00 lb/Ton

3.06E+01 lb/Ton 

1.96E+01 lb/Ton 

2.04E+01 lb/Ton 

4.00E-01 lb/Ton 

4.00E-01 lb/Ton 

4.00E-01 lb/Ton 

2.3 

2.1 Commercial Natural Gas Combustion (SCC 2103006000)

The 2005 total state-level commercial sector energy consumption is obtained from the 

Energy Information Administration (EIA)’s State Energy Data System (SEDS), and 

apportioned per county based on population4

. Emissions factors are given in table 2-1. 

The area source emissions are calculated based on an adjusted value by subtracting 

the emissions due to point sources. 

2.2 Industrial Fuel Combustion 

Industrial Distillate Oil Combustion (SCC 2102004000) 

Ohio’s fuel consumption is apportioned per county based on the county’s population4

. 

The area source NOX emissions are calculated and adjusted by subtracting the 

emissions due to point sources. A heating value of 140 MMBTU/1000 Gal is used and 

84,408 thousand gallons are consumed in 2005. [MMBTU stand for Million British 

Thermal Units]. Emissions factors are given in table 2-1. 

SO2 emissions were calculated using EF 42.6 Lb/1000 Gal. PM10 and PM2.5 emissions

are calculated using 1Lb/1000 Gal and 0.25 Lb/1000 Gal respectively. All Factors are 

obtained from AP-4219 

Industrial Residual Oil Combustion (SCC 2102005000) 

Ohio’s fuel consumption is apportioned per county based on the county’s population4

. 

The area source NOX emissions are calculated and adjusted by subtracting the 

emissions due to point sources. 54,652 thousand gallons14 are consumed in 2005 and 

a heating value of 140 MMBTU/1000 Gal is used. The SO2 emissions are calculated 

using EF 157 Lb/1000 Gal. PM10 and PM2.5 emissions are calculated using 7.17 Lb/1000 

Gal and 4.67 Lb/1000 Gal respectively. All factors are obtained from AP-4219 

Industrial Natural Gas Combustion (SCC 2102006000) 

Ohio’s fuel consumption is apportioned per county based on the county’s population4

. 

The area source NOX emissions are calculated and adjusted by subtracting the 

emissions due to point sources. 293,857 MMCF14 are consumed in 2005. The SO2

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 80
10

emissions are calculated using EF 0.6 Lb/MMBTU. The PM10 and PM2.5 emissions are 

calculated using 7.6 Lb/MMBTU. All factors were obtained from AP-4219 

2.3 Residential Fuel Combustion 

Residential Coal Combustion (SCC 2104001000) 

Ohio’s household consumption of coal is apportioned per county based on county 

population4

. NOX emissions are calculated using EF of 9.1 of coal. The SO2 emissions 

are calculated using EF 31Lb/1000 Gal. The PM10 and PM2.5 emissions are calculated 

using 6.2Lb/Ton and 3.8 Lb/Ton respectively. All factors were obtained from AP-4219 

Residential Distillate Oil Combustion (SCC 2104004000) 

Ohio’s household consumption of distillate oil is apportioned per county based on 

county population4. NOX emissions are calculated using EF of 18 lb/1000 gallons 

distillate fuel respectively. A heating value of 140 MMBTU/1000 Gal is used. The SO2

emissions are calculated using EF 42.6 Lb/1000 Gal. The PM10 and PM2.5 emissions

are calculated using 1.08Lb/1000 Gal and 0.83 Lb/1000 Gal respectively. All factors are 

obtained from AP-4219 

Residential Liquid Petroleum Gas Combustion (LPG) 

(SCC 2104007000) 

Ohio’s household consumption of LPG is apportioned per county based on county 

population4. NOX emissions are calculated using EF of 13 lb/1000 gallons LPG. The 

SO2 emissions are calculated using EF 0.1 Lb/1000 Gal. The PM10 and PM2.5 emissions

are calculated using 0.17Lb/1000 Gal. All factors are obtained from AP-4219 

Residential Natural Gas Combustion (SCC 2104006010) 

Ohio’s household consumption of LPG is apportioned per county based on county 

population4

. NOX emissions are calculated using EF of 94 lb/MMSCF. MMSCF stands 

for Million Standard Cubic Feet. This source also emits SO2 emissions which are 

calculated using EF 0.6 Lb/MMBTU. The PM10 and PM2.5 emissions are calculated 

using 7.6Lb/MMBTU. All factors are obtained from AP-4219 

Residential Wood Combustion 

NOX emissions from this area source are calculated for seven types of residential 

heating units that utilize wood for fuel. They are listed below with the appropriate SCC: 

Fireplaces without inserts 2104008001 

Fireplaces with inserts catalytic (non-U.S. EPA cert) 2104008002 

Fireplaces with inserts non -catalytic 2104008003 

Fireplaces with inserts catalytic (U.S. EPA cert) 2104008004 

Wood stoves – Conventional 2104008010 

Woodstoves – Catalytic 2104008030 

Wood stoves – Non catalytic 2104008050 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 81
11

The number of Ohio homes with fireplaces are adjusted for those that burn wood. The 

following assumptions are applied to those adjusted homes: 

92 percent of wood combusted in non-certified units 

5.7 percent of wood combusted in non-catalytic units 

2.3 percent of wood combusted in catalytic units 

A state consumption value is applied which is apportioned to each county based on its 

population4. Table 2-2 shows the EF used for each of the seven types of indoor wood 

burners which make-up this category: 

Table 2-2 Emission Factors Used for Wood Burners 

SCC 2104008002 2104008003 2104008004 

SCC 2104008010 2104008050 2104008030 

SCC 2104008001 

RAPIDS Code Non-Certified Non-Catalytic Catalytic Units 

SO2 4.00E-01 4.00E-01 4.00E-01 Lb/ton 

NOX 2.80E+00 2.80E+00 2.00E+00 Lb/ton 

PM2.5 3.06E+01 1.96E+01 2.04E+01 Lb/ton

To avoid double counting of wood consumption for fuel, this category is adjusted by 

subtracting the wood consumption from OWB to allow this category to account only for 

indoor wood burning emissions. 

Residential Wood combustion also emits SO2 which is calculated using EF 0.4 Lb/Ton 

EF. The PM2.5 emissions are calculated using EF as shown in table 2-2. All factors are 

obtained from AP-4219 

2.4 Human Cremation (SCC 2810060200) 

 

Not all Ohio counties possess a crematory so only those counties with crematories are 

used to calculate the number of cremations and their resulting NOx emissions. The 

2005 cremation data is obtained from the Ohio Department of Health, Vital Statistics17. 

It is estimated that 3% of deaths occur outside the State of Ohio with no available data 

to account for their disposition at the time this area source is being calculated. 

Therefore, those deaths are not accounted for in this category. 

The methodology does not offer an EF for NOx for this category nor is NOx required to 

be calculated for this area source. Ohio feels that it is a combustion source and NOx 

needs to be included in the inventory along with the other combustion sources. 

Through its Permits-to-Install for human cremation, Ohio has selected a NOx EF of 

10.13lb/ton cremated to calculate emissions from this area source. 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 82
12

This source also emits PM, PM10, and PM2.5 emissions which are calculated using EF 

0.1 Lb/Ton, 0.071Lb/Ton and, 0.0637 Lb/Ton respectively. All factors are obtained from 

AP-4219

2.5 Structure Fires (SCC 2810030000) 

The Structure Fires category includes residential and commercial fires resulting from 

unintentional actions. Intentional fires, forest and wildfires, agricultural, and vehicle 

burning are not included in this area source. The State Fire Marshall Office, Fire 

Prevention Bureau15 provided data on the number of structure fires per county in 2005. 

This area source is considered a combustion source for NOX emissions which are 

calculated using EF 1.4 lb/ton burned. The residential and commercial structures fires 

for each county are tabulated and a fuel loading of 1.15 Ton/fire is applied. This source 

also emits PM, PM10, and PM2.5 emissions which are calculated using EF 10.8 Lb/Ton. 

This factor was obtained from AP-4219 

2.6 Outdoor Wood Boilers (SCC 2104008070) 

Outdoor Wood Boilers (OWB), are also known as outdoor water stoves and outdoor 

wood furnaces, are used as outdoor residential heaters. These boilers have wood 

burning fireboxes surrounded by a water reservoir vented by a chimney stack. The 

combustion of the wood in the firebox heats the water in the surrounding reservoir and 

the heated water is pumped to the residence. OWB units can also supply residential 

hot water. The water capacity ranges from 60 gallons to 764 gallons. The operational 

design creates long periods where the fire smolders and creosote is formed13. 

When the water circulating through the furnace reaches an upper set point, the air 

supply to the fire is cut-off, cooling the fire so the water will not overheat. The furnace 

operates in this "idle" mode until the water temperature hits a lower set point and the air 

supply is re-established. The OWB may be in idle mode far longer than in operating 

mode. This type of operating causes very poor combustion and heavy foul smoke. Most 

of the smoke emitted is fine condensed organic material that does not burn under cool, 

oxygen starved conditions. In addition, many owners burn green wood full of moisture 

which also causes poor combustion12. The smoke created from these outdoor wood 

burning units can contain several pollutants that are harmful to breathe, including fine 

particle pollution such as PM 2.5

11 in addition to NOx (research assisted by Deborah 

Lucas, DAPC intern, 2007) 

This new area source category has many unknowns and variables associated with it 

and Ohio does not possess accurate OWB unit sales data available to calculate 

emissions on the county level. Therefore, several assumptions are made in agreement 

with the Great Lake States in order to formulate a homogeneous inventory for the 

region. 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 83
13

The assumptions are as follows: 

• 100% of wood combusted in non-certified units. 

• OWB units to be 90% in rural counties and 10% in urban counties 

• 11.68 cords of wood consumption per unit per year (includes heating efficiency of 

30-40%) 

• 5 months heating season = 3650 hours (24/7) 

• PM2.5 emissions factor (g/kg wood) =13.82 (Average of indoor and outdoor) or 

27.64 lb/ton of wood 

The agreed upon methodology requires that total number of OWB sold in Ohio be 

apportioned to each county based on rural or urban designation while observing the 9:1 

ratio in area sales. The guesstimated factors (see above) are applied to calculate the 

emissions from this outdoor wood burner. Total emissions obtained from this category 

are subtracted from the Residential Wood Combustion category to allow for accurate 

emissions from the indoor wood burning units. 

 

2.7 References 

1. Documentation For the 2002 Non-Point Source National Emission Inventory For 

CAPS and HAPS. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Emissions Factor and 

inventory Group. E.H Pechan and Associates, Inc. January 2004. 

2. United States Census Bureau. Population Division.

http://eire.census.gov/popest/data/counties/tables/CO-EST2002/CO-EST2002-01-

39.php (Accessed 2003) 

3. United States Census Bureau. County Business Patterns. 

http://censtats.census.gov/cbpnaic/cbpnaic.shtml

(Accessed 2003) 

4. Ohio Department of Development, Office of Strategic Research. Population Projects 

by Age and Sex: 2005-2030. http://www.odod.ohio.gov/research/files/p200.htm

(Accessed August 2006) 

5. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1999 Base Year Non-point Source National 

Emission Inventory for Hazardous Air Pollutants, Research Triangle Park, NC. 

September 28, 2001. 

6. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). STAPPA-ALAPCO-EPA Emission 

Inventory Improvement Program (EIIP). Volume III - Area Sources Preferred and 

Alternative Methods. November 1996. 

7. Documentation for the Draft 1999 National Emissions Inventory (Version 3.0) for 

Criteria Air Pollutants and Ammonia. Area Sources. E. H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. 

March 3, 2003 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 84
14

8. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, STAPPA-ALAPCO-EPA Emission Inventory 

Improvement Program (EIIP), Volume III - Area Sources Preferred and Alternative 

Methods, Chapter 8. September 1997. 

9. Spreadsheet formulation provided by “Buzz” David Asselmeier, Air Quality Planning 

Section, Inventory Group, Springfield, Illinois. 

10. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). STAPPA-ALAPCO-EPA Emission 

Inventory Improvement Program (EIIP). Volume III - Area Sources Preferred and 

Alternative Methods. May 1997. 

11. (Environmental Chemistry.com) viewed on Feb 8th, 2007. 

[http://environmentalchemistry.com/yogi/environmental/200602outdoorwoodfurnaces.ht

ml] 

12. (Washington State, Department of Ecology) viewed on Feb 8th, 2007 

[http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/air/AOP_Permits/Boiler/Outdoor_Boilers_home.html]

13. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Reducing Pollution from Outdoor WoodFired Hydronic Heaters. Fact Sheet

http://www.epa.gov/owhh/pdfs/fact_sheet_1_29_07.pdf (Accessed 1/2007) 

14. Industrial Sector Energy Price and Expenditure Estimates, 1970-2001, Ohio. 

Energy Information Administration. U. S. Department of Energy. 

http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/states/sep_prices/ind/pr_ind_oh.html

http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/aer/pdf/pages/sec1_27.pdf (Accessed 2003) 

15. State Fire Marshal Office. Fire Prevention Bureau, Columbus, Ohio. 

http://www.com.state.oh.us/odoc/sfm/firecont.htm (Accessed 2003) 

16. Documentation for the Draft 1999 National Emissions Inventory (Version 3.0) For 

Criteria Air Pollutants and Ammonia. Area Sources. E. H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. 

March 3, 2003 

17. Ohio Department of Health, Vital Statistics 

18. Environmental Protection Agency. STAPPA-ALAPCO-EPA Emission Inventory 

Improvement Program (EIIP). Volume X – Emissions Projections. December 1999. 

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/volume10/x01.pdf

(Accessed 2/2007) 

19. Environmental Protection Agency. AP-42. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 85
15

SECTION 3

NON-ROAD SOURCES 

The non-road inventory is generated regionally by running U.S. EPA’s National Mobile 

Inventory Model (NMIM) model. The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources 

undertook the responsibility of customizing the NMIM input files and submitting the 

output file in NIF format to LADCO and U.S. EPA. LADCO processed the NMIM files in 

their emissions model and generated daily emissions rates. Grant Heatherington from 

the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources provided the following descriptions... 

The National Mobile Inventory Model (NMIM) developed by USEPA was used to 

estimate emissions for all other non-road mobile categories. NMIM consolidates nonroad mobile emissions and on-road emissions modeling into a single modeling system. 

Only the non-road emissions modeling portion of NMIM was used in the development of 

this emission’s inventory. NMIM uses the USEPA’s NONROAD model to calculate nonroad mobile emissions. The basic NONROAD algorithm for calculating emissions uses 

base year equipment populations, average load factors, available engine powers, 

activity hours and emission factors. Before NMIM was run, modifications and additions 

were made to the NMIM input data. 

a. Added emission factors for diesel tampers/rammers provided by E.H. 

Pechan & Associates, Inc. Diesel tampers/rammers are a type of 

construction equipment. 

b. Revised PM2.5 ratios in SCC table to correctly calculate PM2.5 diesel 

emissions. This error was introduced with NMIM2005 and didn’t exist in 

NMIM2004. 

c. Revised gasoline parameters using updates provided by the states and 

E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. Gasoline parameters include Reid Vapor 

Pressure (RVP), oxygenate content and sulfur content. 

The NMIM NEI NIF files are on the LADCO ftp site at: 

ftp://ftp.airtoxics.org/inv2005/nonroad/NMIM/Base_L_ph2/2005/

Revised NMIM2005 Input Data 

Emission Factor Data 

All States: Pechan revised the brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC) emission factor data to 

include diesel tampers/rammers (2270002006). The revised NMIM file is saved as 

revBSFC.EMF. 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 86
16

Population Data 

For 26000.pop, replaced default file supplied with NMIM2005 with 26000_rev_NMIM05.pop that 

contains revised construction data missing from 26000.pop external file provided with 

NMIM2005. This Michigan construction data should have been added with the other LADCO 

states modified construction data but was overlooked. 

SCC Data 

The default SCC table of NCD20060201 is replaced by a version that contains corrections to the 

PM25fac field that earlier NCDs contained (i.e. changed from 0.92 to 0.97 for diesel non-road 

equipment) in NONROAD2004. 

Fuel Data 

LADCO States: Pechan revised four tables (countyyear, countyyearmonth, datasource and 

gasoline) in the National County Database (NCD) used by NMIM to incorporate new fuel data. 

AIR revised gasoline characteristics per instructions from the states. Also, gasoline 

characteristic revisions for 2005 provided by states were incorporated. Additional revisions 

were incorporated into 2002 data for non-road Stage 2 controls. Depending on the year being 

modeled, different versions of the revised tables are used. Also, the countynrfile, countyyear 

and datasource tables were revised to reference the new activity, allocation, growth, population 

and seasonality files described above. NCD tables with names ending in “def” are default 

versions of the table. See table below for the appropriate versions of the tables for the selected 

years. 

Non-LADCO States: The countynrfile, countyyear and datasource tables were revised to 

reference the new activity, allocation and seasonality files described above. See table below for 

the appropriate versions of the tables for the selected years. 

Table 3-1 NMIM National County Database Tables for Specific Years and States 

States 

Years 

1999 (WI only) 2002, 05, 07, 08, 09, 12 and 18 

LADCO states countynrfile_NMIM05_rev, 

countyyear_NMIM05_rev, 

countyyearmonth_NMIM05_w

_05_12_18_rev, 

datasource_NMIM05_rev, 

gasoline_NMIM05_def 

SCC_NCD20060201_rev 

(used when NCD20060201 is 

used) 

countynrfile_NMIM05_rev, 

countyyear_NMIM05_rev , 

countyyearmonth_NMIM05_w_05_12_18_rev, 

datasource_NMIM05_rev, 

gasoline_NMIM05_w_05_12_18_rev 

SCC_NCD20060201_rev (used when 

NCD20060201 is used)

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 87
17

SECTION 4

ON-ROAD SOURCES 

A mobile source of air pollution is a self-propelled or portable emitter of air pollutants, 

and mobile source emissions are those generated by the engines or motors that power 

such sources. Most mobile sources, except jet or turboprop aircraft, are powered by 

internal combustion (IC) piston engines, and nearly all use liquid fuels. 

Gaseous fuels, such as compressed natural gas (CNG) or liquefied petroleum gas 

(LPG), had only a very small fraction of the motor fuel market in Ohio in 2005. Solid 

fuels have not been used by mobile sources in significant amounts since railroads 

retired their coal-powered steam locomotives in the 1950s. 

4.1 Categories of Mobile Sources 

For inventory and planning purposes, mobile sources are divided into two major 

categories. 

1. On-highway mobile sources (usually referred to as on-road), e.g., motor 

vehicles such as cars, vans, trucks, buses and motorcycles used for 

transportation of goods and passengers on roads and streets 

2. Off-highway (usually referred to as non-road) mobile sources including: 

• Modes of powered transportation that do not use roads, such as aircraft, 

trains, ships and boats, and motor vehicles used off-road. 

• Self-propelled or portable motorized machines or equipment not used for 

transportation, ranging from construction equipment and farm tractors to 

lawnmowers and hand-held power weed choppers. 

Mobile Sources: All on-road mobile sources are self-propelled. 

Non-road Mobile Sources: Some non-road mobile sources (e.g., farm tractors), are 

self-propelled, but many non-road sources are not. A gasoline-powered chain saw is a 

familiar example of a non-self-propelled non-road mobile source. 

Stationary Sources: Not all movable or portable emission sources are mobile sources, 

however. A small truck-portable cement or hot-mix asphalt plant, for example, may be 

set up near a construction or road-building site. Such plants are classified as stationary 

sources, not mobile sources for two reasons: (1) they may operate for weeks or months 

at a single location, and (2) the trucks that move the plants do not supply power for 

them. 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 88
18

NOTE: Not all Internal Combustion engines (IC) or turbine engines are mobile sources. 

Fixed IC engines, such as those that power pipeline compressors or standby generators 

in electricity plants and elsewhere, are also classified as stationary sources. 

4.1.1 Categories and Components of Mobile Source Emissions 

There are three categories of mobile source emissions: 

• Exhaust or tailpipe emissions, which result from the combustion of fuel in the 

source’s engine 

• Evaporative emissions, which result from evaporation of fuel from the engine or 

its fuel system 

• Refueling emissions 

Exhaust Emissions: Are the result of fuel combustion and occur only when the engine 

is running. 

Evaporative emissions: Are Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) based only and are 

continuously emitted from an engine’s fuel system, whether the engine is running or not. 

Gasoline is a very volatile fuel, so total VOC emissions from gasoline powered vehicles 

have a large evaporative component. Diesel and jet fuels are of very low volatility, so 

evaporative emissions from diesel and turbine engines are a much smaller part of their 

total VOC emissions. Evaporative emissions for CNG or LPG powered vehicles are 

negligible because their fuel tanks and systems are of necessity, sealed. 

Evaporative and exhaust VOC emissions can be calculated separately for most mobile 

source categories. Evaporative emissions do not include VOC emissions that occur 

during refueling. 

Refueling Emissions: These emissions are the third category of mobile source 

emissions. Refueling emissions are entirely VOC. Although they result from the 

evaporation of fuel, they are distinct from, and not directly related to, evaporative 

emissions as defined above. 

Refueling emissions have two subcomponents: 

• Displacement emissions. These occur when new fuel is transferred into a partly 

filled tank--be it a service station storage tank, a portable fuel container (gas 

can), or a vehicle or engine’s fuel tank; displacing the air in the tank and forcing 

that vapor-rich air out the inlet pipe or other vent. There are two stages of 

displacement emissions: 

o “Stage I” emissions occur when the underground storage tanks at a 

service station are being refilled; 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 89
19

o “Stage II” emissions occur when a motor vehicle (or gas can) is being 

refueled. 

NOTE: These emissions are covered in, “Area Sources,” section 3.6. 

• Spill emissions. These occur when drops of fuel drip or splash on the ground 

during or after refueling and evaporate away. 

4.2 Ohio On-Road Mobile Source Inventory 

The inventory of on-road mobile source emissions was developed in conjunction with 

the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT), Lake Michigan Air Director’s 

Consortium (LADCO), United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), and 

the Ohio EPA (OEPA). Estimates of the amounts of NOx and VOC are reported by 

county in tons per day. Emissions are reported for a typical ozone season weekday in 

the summer of 2005. 

4.2.1 Emission Inventories Developed with MOBILE6 Model 

MOBILE6 Overview: 

MOBILE6 is a computer program that estimates hydrocarbon (HC), carbon monoxide 

(CO), oxides of nitrogen (NOx), exhaust particulate matter (which consists of several 

components), tire wear particulate matter, brake wear particulate matter, sulfur dioxide 

(SO2), ammonia (NH3), six hazardous air pollutant (HAP), and carbon dioxide (CO2) 

emission factors for gasoline-fueled and diesel highway motor vehicles, and for certain 

specialized vehicles such as natural-gas-fueled or electric vehicles that may replace 

them. The program uses the calculation procedures presented in technical reports 

posted on EPA's MOBILE6 Web page http://www.epa.gov/otaq/models.htm. 

MOBILE6 emission factor estimates depend on various conditions, such as ambient 

temperatures, travel speeds, operating modes, fuel volatility, and mileage accrual rates. 

Many of the variables affecting vehicle emissions can be specified by the user. 

MOBILE6 will estimate emission factors for any calendar year between 1952 and 2050, 

inclusive. Vehicles from the 25 most recent model years are considered to be in 

operation in each calendar year. 

4.2.2 MOBILE6 Defaults: 

MOBILE6 includes default values for a wide range of conditions that affect emissions. 

These defaults are designed to represent “national average” input data values. Users 

who desire a more precise estimate of local emissions can substitute information that 

more specifically reflects local conditions. Use of local input data will be particularly 

common when the local emission inventory is to be constructed from separate 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 90
20

estimates of roadways, geographic areas, or times of day, in which fleet or traffic 

conditions vary considerably. 

A list of MOBILE6 input parameters is provided below. Most of these inputs are optional 

because the model will supply default values unless alternate data are provided. 

4.2.3 MOBILE6 Input Parameters 

• Calendar year

• Month (January, July) 

• Hourly Temperature 

• Altitude (high, low) 

• Weekend/weekday 

• Fuel characteristics (Reid vapor pressure, sulfur content, 

 oxygenate content, etc.) 

• Humidity and solar load 

• Registration (age) distribution by vehicle class 

• Annual mileage accumulation by vehicle class 

• Diesel sales fractions by vehicle class and model year 

• Average speed distribution by hour and roadway 

• Distribution of vehicle miles traveled by roadway type 

• Engine starts per day by vehicle class and distribution by hour 

• Engine start soak time distribution by hour 

• Trip end distribution by hour 

• Average trip length distribution 

• Hot soak duration 

• Distribution of vehicle miles traveled by vehicle class 

• Full, partial, and multiple diurnal distribution by hour 

• Inspection and maintenance (I/M) program description 

• Anti-tampering inspection program description 

• Stage II refueling emissions inspection program description 

• Natural gas vehicle fractions 

• HC species output 

• Particle size cutoff 

• Emissions factors for PM and HAP 

• Output format specifications and selections

4.2.4 MOBILE6 References 

The following publications provide much of the guidance for the preparation of the onhighway inventory. 

EPA-450/4-81-026d (Revised), now EPA/450-R-92-009, Procedures for Emission 

Inventory Preparation, Volume IV: Mobile Sources, December 1992. Hereafter, 

“Procedures Vol. IV”. The 1992 version is still the definitive document on 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 91
21

inventories. If a previous edition is referred to, the fact will be noted as, for example, 

“the 1989 Procedures Vol. IV” or “Volume IV, 1989 edition”. 

EPA420-R-03-010, User’s Guide to MOBILE6.1 and MOBILE6.2: Mobile Source 

Emission Factor Model, August 2003. This is the User’s Guide for the official 

MOBILE6.2.03 on-highway mobile source emission factor model and will usually be 

referred to as the M6.2 (or simply M6) User’s Guide (UG). The M6 model in its 

various versions was developed and published by Assessment & Modeling Division 

(AMD) of the National Vehicle & Fuels Emissions Laboratory (NVFEL) in Ann Arbor, 

Michigan. The NVFEL is part of USEPA Office of Transportation & Air Quality 

(OTAQ), formerly the Office of Mobile Sources (OMS). 

Technical Guidance on the Use of MOBILE6 for Emission Inventory 

Preparation, August 2004. Hereafter, the M6 “Technical Guidance [Document]” or 

“TGD”. The TGD is the primary source of guidance on M6 inputs and an invaluable 

adjunct to the M6 User’s Guide. 

USEPA document “Frequently Asked Questions on MOBILE6”, 16 January 

2002. Hereafter, [M6] “FAQ”. This document was published along with the M6 

TGD. 

USEPA memo, “Policy Guidance on the Use of MOBILE6 for SIP Development 

and Transportation Conformity”, dated 18 January 2002, from John Seitz, 

Director of OAQPS, and Margo Oge, Director of OTAQ, to Regional Air Division 

Directors. 

4.3 Ohio’s Alternate Data for MOBILE6 

Alternative data is state-specific data that is used in the Mobile6 runs. Using local data 

is preferred to using the default data in Mobile6. Efforts are made to collect as much 

local data as possible. 

4.3.1 Vehicle Registration Distribution by Age 

Overview: 

The vehicle age distribution determines the fraction of vehicles operating within each 

emissions control requirement standard and the deterioration of the emission control 

technology. 

Emission rates vary widely between new and older vehicles. Thus, even small changes 

in fleet age, particularly for older vehicles, may result in large changes in emission 

totals. 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 92
22

The MOBILE6 model requires estimates of a distribution of registered vehicles by age 

and vehicle category for current and future years. MOBILE6 default values were 

developed using national level vehicle registration data by age and class for July 1, 

1996. EPA developed a methodology to convert the July 1, 1996 registration profile into 

a general registration distribution by age and by vehicle category for some 6 composite 

(gasoline and diesel) vehicle types plus motorcycles. To project future changes, EPA 

evaluated general sales growth and vehicle scrappage trends for the total light-duty 

vehicle in-use fleet and the total heavy-duty vehicle in-use fleet, and made minor 

adjustments, where possible, to reflect some of the differences between vehicle 

categories. 

Description: The MOBILE6 model requires estimates of a distribution of registered 

vehicles by age and vehicle category for current and future years. OEPA chose to use 

local vehicle registration data provided by the Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles (BMV) 

which was sent to the Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium (LADCO) to develop 

these inputs. LADCO then contracted with a subcontractor to breakout the age 

distribution data from the Vehicle Identification Numbers (VIN). 

Note: It was learned during the course of this inventory that there were some 

discrepancies in the age distribution data. But it was too large of a project to reevaluate 

the data prior to this inventory. This will be corrected in the next inventory (2008). 

Method Applicability: This approach is most applicable in areas where there are 

significant differences in the local vehicle fleet age distribution relative to the national 

average. 

Data Sources and Procedures: This approach involves using local vehicle registration 

data. This is typically available at the county level, but may also be applied using 

statewide data from the state motor vehicle registration office. The fleet age should be 

representative of the vehicle fleet over the small urban or rural area under question. 

Advantages: 

• Uses locally specific registration data, which is likely more representative of the 

local area than the national default. 

• Requires minimal additional resources, particularly if data is readily available at 

the county or local level from the State department of motor vehicle registration. 

• Recommended by EPA and generally is encouraged as a preferred approach 

over the national default approach.

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 93
23

4.3.2 Daily Vehicle Miles Traveled (DVMT) 

Overview: 

In coordination with Ohio Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs), the Ohio 

Department of Transportation (ODOT) provided Daily Vehicle Miles Traveled (DVMT) 

data and travel demand model (TDM) data. TDM data will be covered in another 

section. Because TDM results are used by the state and MPOs to forecast traffic for a 

variety of reasons, undergo rigorous calibration and validation checks, and are sensitive 

to roadway capacity/travel time improvements, the TDMs are considered the best tool 

for emissions forecasting. Therefore, the DVMT data discussed in this section is not 

used directly for all areas of Ohio. In counties where it is not used directly it is used for 

making rough emissions estimates where models do not exist or where time prohibits 

the use of TDMs. DVMT is a simple mechanism to measure how much traffic is flowing 

along a roadway during an average 24 hour period. This simple formula multiplies 

Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) by the length of the roadway. For example; if a 

roadway is 2 miles in length and the AADT is 4000 vehicles per day the DVMT would be 

computed by multiplying 2*4,000 =8,000 or 8,000 DVMT. 

County-By-County DVMT is computed using the State of Ohio, Department of 

Transportation’s Roadway Information Files and the annual Highway Performance 

Monitoring System (HPMS) Summary Reports. DVMT’s are computed for all of the 

Federal Functional Class (FC) categories within each of Ohio’s 88 counties. 

The AADT and Roadway length information provides a very accurate estimate of 

statewide total DVMT for The State Highway System (Interstate, US and State Routes). 

County total DVMT are consistent and considered a good source of county level DVMT 

for countywide emissions estimates. For roadways that are not part of the State 

Highway System, various representative counts were used, such as: railroad crossing 

counts, HPMS Sample Section Counts, etc. All traffic count data that was not collected 

during the current year has had statewide growth factors applied to account for 

systematic growth. 

Given the previously mentioned methodologies, the DVMT data is more accurate on 

roads functionally classified as collector or above. 

Table 4-1 Federal Functional Class Categories: 

01 - Rural Interstate 

02 - Rural Principal Arterial 

06 - Rural Minor Arterial 

07 - Rural Major Collector 

08 - Rural Minor Collector 

09 - Rural Local 

11 - Urban Interstate 

12 - Urban Freeway & Expressway 

14 - Urban Principal Arterial 

16 - Urban Minor Arterial 

17 - Urban Collector 

19 - Urban Local 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 94
24

Table 4-2 DVMT County Summary: 

For PDF web based tables of 2005 DVMT by county see: 

http://www.dot.state.oh.us/techservsite/availpro/Road_%20Infor/KDVMT/vmt2005.pdf

Disclaimer by ODOT: 

The above PDF web based tables contain the State of Ohio's adjusted county DVMT's 

and road mileage for the years 1990 - 2005. Please be aware that the numbers are 

estimates only. The factoring process used annual, estimated, and statewide ADT 

(Average Daily Traffic) growth factors, derived from the output of a limited number of 

traffic counting stations around the state. Although the growth factors are available by 

functional class, they are more reliable for major roads such as interstates or 

expressways, which are relatively well-sampled, than for local roads or collectors. The 

numbers also do no allow for periodic, large-scale functional reclassification actions 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 95
25

which reassign selected roads or road segments from one functional class to another. 

The Ohio Department of Transportation therefore does not warrant the accuracy, 

completeness, or reliability of these estimates for your research. We also do not 

assume responsibility for any incorrectness that may occur. 

4.3.3 VMT From Travel Demand Models (TDM) 

Overview: 

Travel demand forecast modeling is performed by the Ohio Metropolitan Planning 

Organizations (MPOs) and ODOT for a multitude of purposes including the preparation 

of regional emissions estimates. The ODOT Office of Technical Services’ Modeling & 

Forecasting Section recommends that Ohio’s TDMs and ODOT’s conformity analysis 

methods be used to establish the roadway mobile source portion of Ohio’s SIP budget 

to assure consistent methods are used for transportation conformity analysis and 

budgets. Therefore, ODOT provided both MPO regional TDM runs and statewide TDM 

runs with associated data to OEPA and LADCO. The ODOT provided model run data 

for years 2002, 2005, 2009, 2012, and 2018. 

Data provided included loaded networks in both CSV format and GIS shape files, trip 

end summaries, zone boundary GIS shape files, intra-zonal trip VMT estimates, and 

VMT summaries for each of the loaded networks. Additional post processing data was 

provided including but not limited to metadata describing the loaded networks, Hourly 

distribution by functional class, speed profiles, day of week / weekend / monthly car and 

truck traffic profiles, 2009 & 2018 VMT RPO data sets, statewide VMT growth rates for 

local traffic, and a 2005 VMT summary comparison spreadsheet. It should be noted 

that among other things, the loaded TDM Networks contain distance and daily volumes 

from which VMT is computed. 

Network volumes are post processed to estimate VMT by hour of day. The hourly 

volumes and capacity, posted speed limit, and type of roadway for each roadway 

segment are then used to estimate average hourly speeds needed for MOBILE6 based 

emissions estimates. Modeling by segment by hour of day in this way makes emissions 

estimates more sensitive to the effects of roadway improvements. This allows 

transportation planners to evaluate the relative emissions affect of improvements to 

individual roadways as well as packages of improvements and the entire set of planned 

roadway improvement projects air quality impacts of construction programs. 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 96
26

4.3.4 Speed Distribution Profiles 

Overview: 

ODOT provided speed distribution profiles to LADCO. A couple of different sets of 

speed distribution profiles were provided to OEPA and LADCO for their use, a table of 

space mean speeds by functional class for use with DVMTs and link group speed 

curves for post processing travel demand model traffic forecasts. Both sets of speed 

profiles are based on the same speed study conducted by ODOT. The speed study is 

documented in “Statewide Travel Time Study, May 2001 by Greg Giaimo, Ohio 

Department of Transportation”. When OEPA asked for speeds for use with MOBILE6 

for development of CERR, ODOT provided a set of speeds based on that statewide 

travel time study. Those speeds are documented in a technical memorandum titled 

“Estimation of Average Speed by Functional Class for MOBILE6 Runs” dated 

5/27/2004. Readers should refer to those documents for the details. Here the contents 

of the technical memo, Estimated Average Speed by Functional Class, are summarized. 

Space Mean Speeds by Functional Class for Use with County Level DVMT, HPMS: 

The memo states that the speeds which the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) 

had been using prior to that date, 2004, for air quality analysis estimates based on 

County DVMT summaries, were developed by a former ODOT employee for addressing 

the one (1) hour standards conformity rules established due to 1990 emissions 

exceedances. No documentation was found in ODOT’s files on the origin of these 

average speed values or how they were estimated. In addition, EPA has requirements 

for using latest planning assumptions for air quality conformity analyses. Therefore, 

ODOT believed that it was in the state’s best interest to use the most recent available 

data to provide a new set of estimated average speeds consistent with those used for 

urban area travel demand models which were under development at that time. The 

memo contains comparisons of 2002 speed data obtained from traffic count equipment, 

automatic traffic recorders (ATRs) which collect data continuously throughout the year. 

It also contains comparisons of the new speeds with those used to address the one 

hour standard Gebhart’s. The graphs shown in figure 1, taken from the memo, illustrate 

the comparisons. The first graph compares time mean speeds from the ATRs with 

space mean speeds from ODOTs travel time study done in 2001and with the speeds 

used for addressing the one hour standard. 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 97
27

Figure 1 - Speed Comparison Graphs 

Speeds Comparison

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

FC01

FC06

FC08

FC11

FC14

FC17

Functional Class

Speed

Average Speed

1990 Analysis

Speeds

2001 Speed Study

Speeds Comparison

0

20

40

60

80

100

FC01

FC06FC08

FC11FC14FC17

RAMPS

Functional Class

Speed

Average Speed

Min. Avg Speed

Max. Avg. Speed

Gebhardt's Speeds

Spd Study Est

Speeds

Spd Study Greg Est

The following caution statement was taken from the Estimation of Average Speed by 

Functional Class memo. 

CAUTION: It should be noted that speeds on facilities falling in any one of the federal 

functional classifications vary greatly between roadways, between hour of the day, and 

day of the week. So these provide only very rough estimates of speed and should be 

used with caution. In addition, it is expected that these average statewide speeds are 

higher than the average speeds in the non-attainment areas because the nonWeirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 98
28

attainment counties tend to be more populated and more congested. The document 

“Highway Vehicle Speed Estimation Procedures For Use in Emission Inventories”, 

September 1991 by Earl Ruiter of Cambridge Systematics Inc. is referenced by EPA’s 

documented procedures for emission inventory preparation. This document suggests 

post processing travel demand model traffic assignment results to estimate average 

speeds. 

Final space mean speeds that ODOT provided are summarized in the Table 1 below: 

Table 4-3 Speed by Federal Functional Class 

Functional Class 1990 Analysis 2001 Speed Study 

 Speeds Speeds 

FC01 57.3 64.0 

FC02 45.3 53.0 

FC06 39.9 53.0 

FC07 35.1 43.1 

FC08 30.5 43.1 

FC09 28.0 43.1 

FC11 46.3 61.6 

FC12 43.3 61.6 

FC14 18.9 29.3 

FC16 19.6 29.3 

FC17 19.6 29.2 

FC19 19.6 23.8 

It was decided by mutual agreement among individuals within the ODOT Office of 

Technical Services that these new space mean speed based average speed estimates 

were reproducible and defensible since they are well documented and should therefore 

be the speeds used with HPMS** VMT if any year 2002 emissions budget work is done 

using only the county level VMT summaries discussed in section 5.3.2 Daily Vehicle 

Miles Traveled (DVMT). 

** Note that HPMS VMT is a statewide VMT estimate and the county level DVMT 

summaries are consistent with the HPMS VMT so the county level DVMT summaries 

are loosely referred to as HPMS VMTs even though in fact they are not. 

4.3.5 Link Group Speed Curves: 

The ODOT Modeling & Forecasting Section recommends that Ohio’s travel demand 

forecasting models and ODOT’s conformity analysis methods be used to establish the 

roadway mobile source portion of Ohio’s SIP budget for reasons already mentioned in 

5.3.2 and to assure consistent methods are used for transportation conformity 

demonstration analyses and budgets. Therefore, ODOT provided travel demand model 

runs and the speed curves by link group that ODOT uses for the speed estimates within 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 99
29

the post processing of travel demand model runs for estimating regional emissions. 

Table 2 shows these link group curves. 

Table 4-4 Link Group Codes & Associated BPR Curves 

Link 

Group 

Facility 

Type 

Free Flow 

Speed 

Areatype a b 

1 Freeway 75 Any 0.39 6.3 

2 Freeway 70 Any 0.32 7.0 

3 Freeway 65 Any 0.25 9.0 

4 Freeway 60 Any 0.18 8.5 

5 Freeway 55 Any 0.10 10.0 

6 Multi-Lane 60 Rural 0.09 6.0 

7 Multi-Lane 55 Rural 0.08 6.0 

8 Multi-Lane 50 Rural 0.07 6.0 

9 Multi-Lane 45 Rural 0.07 6.0 

10 2 Lane Any Rural 0.34 4.0 

10 Urban 

Street 

50 Suburban 0.34 4.0 

11 Urban 

Street 

50 Urban 0.74 5.0 

12 Urban 

Street 

50 CBD 1.16 6.0 

13 Urban 

Street 

40 Suburban 0.38 5.0 

14 Urban 

Street 

40 Urban 0.70 5.0 

15 Urban 

Street 

40 CBD 1.00 5.0 

16 Urban 

Street 

35 Suburban 0.96 5.0 

17 Urban 

Street 

35 Urban 1.00 5.0 

18 Urban 

Street 

35 CBD 1.40 5.0 

19 Urban 

Street 

30 Suburban 1.11 5.0 

20 Urban 

Street 

30 Urban 1.20 5.0 

21 Urban 

Street 

30 CBD 1.50 5.0 

Note: a and b are the BPR curve parameters for the equation 

T = T0 {1 + a * (V/C)^b] 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 100
30

More complete details about emissions modeling process employed by ODOT may be 

found in ODOT documentations. The document titled “Congestion Management & Air 

Quality Analysis (CMAQ) Program Documentation” dated December 2005 may be 

obtained from the ODOT web site at www.dot.state.oh.us/urban/data/cmaq.doc

(Microsoft Word document) 

4.4 Mobile6 Inputs: 

The following table contains the inputs supplied to LADCO to process our mobile 

inventory. 

4.4.1 Ohio’s 2005 MOBILE6 Inputs 

The following tables are the result of a joint meeting between Ohio EPA, ODOT, and 

MPOs from around the state. At that meeting Mobile6 inputs were discussed and 

efforts were made to verify the sources of data inputs for Moble6. Dialogue has 

continued between the parties. 

For historical reference: 

>>> Dave Moore <Dave.Moore1@dot.state.oh.us> 4/10/2006 2:13 PM >>> 

All, 

An air quality coordination meeting has been scheduled for April 27, 2006 at 10:00 AM at ODOT Central 

Office conference room GA. The primary purpose of this meeting is to discuss development of 2002 

mobile source inventories for use in developing the Ohio 2007 8-Hour Ozone SIP Attainment 

Demonstrations. See meeting agenda below. OEPA is working toward a June 15, 2006 schedule for 

submitting the 2002 inventories to US EPA. 

A key component of the meeting will be to review and confirm the MOBILE6.2 input parameters, by Ohio 

a/q area, for use in developing the 2002 mobile inventories. See draft template below. The Ohio MPO 

travel demand models will be used to generate the 2002 VMT inputs to MOBILE. Thanks, DM 

DM 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 101
31

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The following tables are not to be used for inventory purposes 

as the data is subject to change. For the current input table, contact Ohio EPA, Division 

of Air Pollution Control. 

Table 4-5 Mobile Inputs 

Cleveland-Akron 2005 Ozone M6.2 Inputs 

Includes the following counties: 

Ashtabula, Cuyahoga, Geauga, Lake, Lorain, Medina, Portage, Summit 

 

State Programs 

Input 

 

Stage II Refueling 93/3/86/86 

 

Anti-tampering Programs 96/78/50/22222/21111111/1/12/098./12111112 

I/M Programs Yes 

Exclude Ashtabula County - No I/M program 

Program 1 2004 2050 2 T/O OBD I/M 

Model Years 1 1996 2050 

Vehicles 1 22222 21111111 1 

Stringency 1 30.0 

Compliance 1 98.0 

Waiver Rates 1 1.0 1.0 

Cutpoints 

Exemption Age 1 25 

Grace Period 1 4 

NO TTC Credits 

Effectiveness 

DESC file 

 

Program 2 2004 2050 2 T/O EVAP OBD & GC 

Model Years 2 1996 2050 

Vehicles 2 22222 11111111 1 

Stringency 

Compliance 2 98.0 

Waiver Rates 2 1.0 1.0 

Cutpoints 

Exemption Age 2 25 

Grace Period 2 4 

NO TTC Credits 

Effectiveness 

DESC file 

 

Program 3 2001 2003 2 T/O ASM 2525 PHASE-IN 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 102
32

Model Years 3 1996 2003 

Vehicles 3 22222 21111111 1 

Stringency 3 30.0 

Compliance 3 98.0 

Waiver Rates 3 3.0 1.0 

Cutpoints 

Exemption Age 3 25 

Grace Period 3 2 

NO TTC Credits 

Effectiveness 

DESC file 

 

Program 4 2001 2050 2 T/O ASM 2525 PHASE-IN 

Model Years 4 1975 1995 

Vehicles 4 22222 21111111 1 

Stringency 4 30.0 

Compliance 4 98.0 

Waiver Rates 4 3.0 1.0 

Cutpoints 

Exemption Age 4 25 

Grace Period 4 4 

NO TTC Credits 

Effectiveness 

DESC file 

 

Program 5 1998 2000 2 T/O LOADED/IDLE 

Model Years 5 1975 2000 

Vehicles 5 22222 21111111 1 

Stringency 5 30.0 

Compliance 5 98.0 

Waiver Rates 5 3.0 1.0 

Cutpoints 

Exemption Age 5 25 

Grace Period 5 2 

NO TTC Credits 

Effectiveness 

DESC file 

 

Program 6 1996 1997 2 T/O IM240 

Model Years 6 1975 1997 

Vehicles 6 22222 21111111 1 

Stringency 6 30.0 

Compliance 6 98.0 

Waiver Rates 6 3.0 1.0 

Cutpoints 6 CUTPOINT.D 

Exemption Age 6 25 

Grace Period 6 2 

NO TTC Credits 

Effectiveness 

DESC file 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 103
33

 

Program 7 1996 2050 2 T/O GC 

Model Years 7 1975 1995 

Vehicles 7 22222 21111111 1 

Stringency 

Compliance 7 98.0 

Waiver Rates 7 3.0 1.0 

Cutpoints 

Exemption Age 7 25 

Grace Period 7 2 

NO TTC Credits 

Effectiveness 

DESC file 

 

Fuel Commands 

 

Fuel Program 1 

 

Oxygenated Fuels 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.036 2 

 

Fuel RVP 9 

 

Alternative Emission Regulations and Control Measures 

Rebuild Effects 0.1 

 

External Conditions Commands 

 

Calendar Year 2005 

 

Evaluation Month 7 

 

Min/Max Temperature National Climatic Data Center 

 

Vehicle Fleet Characteristic Commands 

 

Registration Distribution Variable 

 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 104
34

Cincinnati-Dayton-Springfield 2005 Ozone M6.2 Inputs 

Includes the following counties: 

Ohio: Butler, Clark, Clermont, Clinton, Greene, Hamilton, Miami, Montgomery, 

Warren

Indiana: Lawrenceburg Twp., Dearborn County

Kentucky: Boone, Campbell and Kenton counties

State Programs 

Input 

Note: Indiana and Kentucky inputs may not coincide with Ohio inputs 

 

Stage II Refueling 93/3/86/86 

 

Anti-tampering Programs 96/78/05/22222/21111111/1/12/098./12111112 

I/M Programs Yes 

Excludes Clinton Co. and Miami Co., OH, Dearborn County, IN - No I/M program 

Note: I/M inputs for Kentucky counties are not included 

Program 1 2004 2050 2 T/O OBD I/M 

Model Years 1 1996 2050 

Vehicles 1 22222 21111111 1 

Stringency 1 30.0 

Compliance 1 98.0 

Waiver Rates 1 1.0 1.0 

Cutpoints 

Exemption Age 1 25 

Grace Period 1 2 

NO TTC Credits 

Effectiveness 

DESC file 

 

Program 2 2004 2050 2 T/O EVAP OBD & GC 

Model Years 2 1996 2050 

Vehicles 2 22222 11111111 1 

Stringency 

Compliance 2 98.0 

Waiver Rates 2 1.0 1.0 

Cutpoints 

Exemption Age 2 25 

Grace Period 2 2 

NO TTC Credits 

Effectiveness 

DESC file 

 

Program 3 2001 2003 2 T/O ASM 2525 PHASE-IN 

Model Years 3 1996 2003 

Vehicles 3 22222 21111111 1 

Stringency 3 30.0 

Compliance 3 98.0 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 105
35

Waiver Rates 3 3.0 1.0 

Cutpoints 

Exemption Age 3 25 

Grace Period 3 2 

NO TTC Credits 

Effectiveness 

DESC file 

 

Program 4 2001 2050 2 T/O ASM 2525 PHASE-IN 

Model Years 4 1975 1995 

Vehicles 4 22222 21111111 1 

Stringency 4 30.0 

Compliance 4 98.0 

Waiver Rates 4 3.0 1.0 

Cutpoints 

Exemption Age 4 25 

Grace Period 4 4 

NO TTC Credits 

Effectiveness 

DESC file 

 

Program 5 1998 2000 2 T/O LOADED/IDLE 

Model Years 5 1975 2000 

Vehicles 5 22222 21111111 1 

Stringency 5 30.0 

Compliance 5 98.0 

Waiver Rates 5 3.0 1.0 

Cutpoints 

Exemption Age 5 25 

Grace Period 5 2 

NO TTC Credits 

Effectiveness 

DESC file 

 

Program 6 1996 1997 2 T/O IM240 

Model Years 6 1975 1997 

Vehicles 6 22222 21111111 1 

Stringency 6 30.0 

Compliance 6 98.0 

Waiver Rates 6 3.0 1.0 

Cutpoints 6 CUTPOINT.D 

Exemption Age 6 25 

Grace Period 6 2 

NO TTC Credits 

Effectiveness 

DESC file 

 

Program 7 1996 2050 2 T/O GC 

Model Years 7 1975 1995 

Vehicles 7 22222 21111111 1 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 106
36

Stringency 

Compliance 7 98.0 

Waiver Rates 7 3.0 1.0 

Cutpoints 

Exemption Age 7 25 

Grace Period 7 2 

NO TTC Credits 

Effectiveness 

DESC file 

 

 

Fuel Commands 

 

Fuel Program 1 

 

Oxygenated Fuels 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.036 2 

 

Fuel RVP 9 

 

Alternative Emission Regulations and Control Measures 

Rebuild Effects 0.1 

 

External Conditions Commands 

 

Calendar Year 2005 

 

Evaluation Month 7 

 

Min/Max Temperature National Climatic Data Center 

 

Vehicle Fleet Characteristic Commands 

 

Registration Distribution Variable 

 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 107
37

 

Other Areas (excluding NOACA/AMATS and OKI/MVRPC) Ozone M6.2 

Inputs 

Includes the following counties: 

Ohio: Belmont, Columbiana, Delaware, Fairfield, Franklin, Jefferson, Knox, Licking,

Lucas,Madison, Mahoning, Pickaway, Trumball, Wood 

 

Fuel Commands 

Input 

 

Fuel Program 1 

Oxygenated Fuels 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.036 2 

Fuel RVP 9 

Alternative Emission Regulations and Control Measures 

 

Rebuild Effects 0.1 (0.30 for 2018) 

 

External Conditions Commands 

 

Calendar Year All 

 

Evaluation Month 7 

Min/Max Temperature National Climatic Data Center 

Vehicle Fleet Characteristic Commands 

Registration 

Distribution Variable 

4.5 Ohio’s Mobile Emission Data Processed by LADCO (Lake Michigan Air 

Director’s Consortium): 

2005 TDM and Mobile6 input data were provided to LADCO for processing. The data 

was processed by LADCO with T3 to prepare it as an input into the ConCEPT model. 

T3 and ConCEPT are described as follows. 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 108
38

4.5.1 T3--Development of Link-Level Mobile Source Emission Inventories: 

Highly resolved emission inventories for on-road mobile sources are needed for air 

quality modeling to develop the necessary technical support for new State 

Implementation Plans (SIPs) for regional haze, fine particles, and ozone. Emissions for 

on-road motor vehicles are estimated using vehicle miles traveled, trip starts and ends, 

speed, and other activity data developed by State Agencies and Metropolitan Planning 

Organizations (MPOs) using transportation demand models (TDMs), and emission 

factors from EPA's MOBILE6 model. To support this modeling in the upper Midwest, 

ENVIRON, working with LADCO, State DOTs, and local MPOs, has developed a 

software tool (the TDM Transformation Tool, or "T3") that takes TDM output from 

approximately twenty transportation networks using a variety of models, applies 

appropriate data transformations, and outputs link- and county-level activity data in a 

uniform format for input to the CONCEPT emissions processing model (a new 

emissions processing model also developed with funding from LADCO). In a parallel 

effort, analyses of extensive automatic traffic recorder (ATR) data collected by State 

DOTs were conducted to develop temporal profiles (hour of day, day of week, and 

month of year) of vehicle counts and vehicle mix by roadway type for developing the 

detailed on-road emission inventories. 

T3 provides a conduit from the projections of traffic demand modelers regarding vehicle 

types, road networks, and vehicle activity to the activity data required by emissions 

modelers. The primary goals of T3 are to provide an easy mechanism for incorporating 

TDM model outputs in as "raw" a format as possible, while simultaneously providing a 

great degree of flexibility in representing the TDM projections in terms acceptable to 

most air quality models. These goals have been achieved through the use of a 

dimensional transformation approach, where the dimensions of the various 

transformations are user-defined - hence the name of the tool. 

By Stella Shepard, Alison K. Pollack, John Haasbeek, ENVIRON International 

Corporation, 101 Rowland Way, Suite 220, Novato, CA. 94945 

& Mark Janssen, Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium (LADCO), 2250 E. Devon 

Avenue # 250, Des Plaines, IL 60018, janssen@ladco.org 

4.5.2 ConCEPT--Consolidated Community Emissions Processing Tool an OpenSource Tool for the Emissions Modeling Community: 

The new CONCEPT (CONsolidated Community Emissions Processing Tool) 

Emissions Processor is now available for use by the emissions modeling community. 

Developed as joint project between Alpine Geophysics, LLC and ENVIRON Corporation, 

with Midwest RPO and joint RPO funding, the CONCEPT model combines the best 

attributes of current emissions modeling systems into an open source model highlighting 

the following features: 

• Open Source. Written primarily in PostgreSQL, the software required for running 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 109
39

CONCEPT is in the public domain. The model itself is GNU Public License (GPL) 

compliant and users are encouraged to make additions and enhancements to the 

modeling system. 

• Transparent. The database structure of the model makes the system easy to 

understand, and the modeling codes themselves are extremely well documented to 

encourage user participation in the customizing the system for specific modeling 

requirements. 

• Quality Control. The CONCEPT model structure and implementation allows for 

multiple levels of QA analysis during every step of the emissions calculation process. 

Using the database structures, an emissions modeler can easily trace a process or 

facility and review the calculation procedures and assumptions for any emissions value. 

The CONCEPT model includes modules for the major emissions source 

categories: area source, point source, on-road motor vehicles, non-road motor vehicles 

and biogenic emissions, as well as a number of supporting modules, including spatial 

allocation factor development, speciation profile development, growth and control for 

point and area sources, and CEM point source emissions handling. The emissions 

modeling community has already begun development of additional CONCEPT support 

modules including CEM preprocessing software, graphical QA tools, and an interface to 

the traffic demand models for on-road motor vehicle emissions estimation. 

By Cyndi Loomis, James G. Wilkinson, Alpine Geophysics, LLC, & John Haasbeek, 

Alison Pollack, ENVIRON Corporation. & Mark Janssen, Lake Michigan Air Directors 

Consortium (LADCO), 2250 E. Devon Avenue # 250, Des Plaines, IL 60018, 

janssen@ladco.org 

4.5.3 LADCO Ohio Data Outputs for 2005: 

The following LADCO outputs and documents can be found at: 

www.ladco.org/tech/emis/net05/index.html 

Table 4-6 LADCO Data Output 

Sta

te Network

T3 

Descripti

on DOC

M6 

Inpu

ts

VM

T vs 

HP

MS 

Exc

el

Average 

Day 

VMT 

(this 

should 

match 

conformi

ty 

inventory

)

Co

unt

y 

Em

issi

on

s 

Re

por

t

All 

Pollut

ants 

After 

Speci

ation

Dropped 

VMT

M6 

Run 

Summ

ary

Pollut

ant 

Totals 

(Short

)

Raw 

Summ

ary 

(pol,ve

h, 

etype)

Hourly 

Tempo

ral 

Summ

ary

Hourly 

Veh 

Mix 

Summ

ary

Hourly 

Speed 

Summ

ary 

(with 

volum

e/ 

capaci

ty) 

OH AKRON AKRON OH OH AKRON 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 110
40

OH CANTON CANTON OH OH CANTON 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

OH CINCI CINCI OH OH CINCI 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

OH CLEVE CLEVE OH OH CLEVE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

OH COLUMB

US

COLUMB

US OH OH COLUMBUS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

OH SPRING

FLD

SPRING

FLD OH OH SPRINGFLD 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

OH TOLEDO TOLEDO OH OH TOLEDO 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

OH YNGSTO

WN

YNGSTO

WN OH OH YNGSTOWN 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

OH STATEW

D

STATEW

D OH OH STATEWD 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Additional Documents on LADCO Web Page: 

“Comparison to EPA's Default Model NMIM”

“How we Build the 2005 Vmt/Networks”

“Spreadsheet/Graphics on Vehicle Mix”

“Background on the T3 Tool “ 

4.6 MPO Contact Table 

Table 4-7 County Summary Table of MPOs by County 

FIPS County Model Network MPO Contact Person 

39001 Adams Statewide 

39003 Allen Statewide 

Lima Allen County Regional 

Planning Commission 

Tom Mazur 

39005 Ashland Statewide 

39007 Ashtabula Statewide 

39009 Athens Statewide 

39011 Auglaize Statewide 

39013 Belmont Statewide 

Bel-O-Mar Regional Council 

and Interstate Planning 

Commission 

Rakesh Sharma 

39015 Brown Statewide 

39017 Butler Cincinnat/Dayton 

Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana 

Regional Council of 

Governments 

Andy Reser 

39019 Carroll Statewide 

39021 Champaign Statewide 

39023 Clark Springfield 

Coordinating Committee of 

the Clark County-Springfield 

Eric Ottoson 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 111
41

Transportation Study 

39025 Clermont Cincinnat/Dayton 

Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana 

Regional Council of 

Governments 

Andy Reser 

39027 Clinton Statewide 

39029 Columbiana Statewide 

39031 Coshocton Statewide 

39033 Crawford Statewide 

39035 Cuyahoga Cleveland 

Northeast Ohio Areawide 

Coordinating Agency 

Bill Davis 

39037 Darke Statewide 

39039 Defiance Statewide 

39041 Delaware Columbus 

Mid-Ohio Regional Planning 

Commission 

Nick Gill 

39043 Erie Statewide 

39045 Fairfield Statewide 

39047 Fayette Statewide 

39049 Franklin Columbus 

Mid-Ohio Regional Planning 

Commission 

Nick Gill 

39051 Fulton Statewide 

39053 Gallia Statewide 

39055 Geauga Cleveland 

Northeast Ohio Areawide 

Coordinating Agency 

Bill Davis 

39057 Greene Cincinnat/Dayton 

Miami Valley Regional 

Planning Commission 

Ana Ramirez 

39059 Guernsey Statewide 

39061 Hamilton Cincinnat/Dayton 

Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana 

Regional Council of 

Governments 

Andy Reser 

39063 Hancock Statewide 

39065 Hardin Statewide 

39067 Harrison Statewide 

39069 Henry Statewide 

39071 Highland Statewide 

39073 Hocking Statewide 

39075 Holmes Statewide 

39077 Huron Statewide 

39079 Jackson Statewide 

39081 Jefferson Statewide 

Brooke-Hancock-Jefferson 

Transportation Study Policy 

Committee 

Mike Proprocki 

39083 Knox Statewide 

39085 Lake Cleveland 

Northeast Ohio Areawide 

Coordinating Agency 

Bill Davis 

39087 Lawrence Statewide 

KYOVA Interstate Planning 

Commission 

39089 Licking Columbus 

Licking County Area 

Transportation Study 

Matthew Hill 

39091 Logan Statewide 

39093 Lorain Cleveland Northeast Ohio Areawide Bill Davis 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 112
42

Coordinating Agency 

39095 Lucas Toledo 

Toledo Metropolitan Area 

Council of Governments 

Sujatha Mohanakrishnan 

39097 Madison Statewide 

39099 Mahoning Youngstown 

Eastgate Regional Council 

of Governments 

R.P. Samulka 

39101 Marion Statewide 

39103 Medina Cleveland 

Northeast Ohio Areawide 

Coordinating Agency 

Bill Davis 

39105 Meigs Statewide 

39107 Mercer Statewide 

39109 Miami Cincinnat/Dayton 

Miami Valley Regional 

Planning Commission 

Ana Ramirez 

39111 Monroe Statewide 

39113 Montgomery Cincinnat/Dayton 

Miami Valley Regional 

Planning Commission 

Ana Ramirez 

39115 Morgan Statewide 

39117 Morrow Statewide 

39119 Muskingum Statewide 

39121 Noble Statewide 

39123 Ottawa Statewide 

39125 Paulding Statewide 

39127 Perry Statewide 

39129 Pickaway Statewide 

39131 Pike Statewide 

39133 Portage Akron 

Akron Metropolitan Area 

Transportation Study 

Jason Segedy 

39135 Preble Statewide 

39137 Putnam Statewide 

39139 Richland Statewide 

Richland County Regional 

Planning Commission 

John Adams 

39141 Ross Statewide 

39143 Sandusky Statewide 

39145 Scioto Statewide 

39147 Seneca Statewide 

39149 Shelby Statewide 

39151 Stark Canton 

Stark County Regional 

Planning Commission 

Dan Slicker 

39153 Summit Akron 

Akron Metropolitan Area 

Transportation Study 

Jason Segedy 

39155 Trumbull 

Youngstown (partial 

county model 

coverage) 

Eastgate Regional Council 

of Governments 

R.P. Samulka 

39157 Tuscarawas Statewide 

39159 Union Statewide 

39161 Van Wert Statewide 

39163 Vinton Statewide 

39165 Warren Cincinnat/Dayton 

Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana 

Regional Council of 

Governments 

Andy Reser, OKI 

+ 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 113
43

+ 

Miami Valley Regional 

Planning Commission 

Ana Ramirez, MVRPC 

39167 Washington Statewide 

Wood-Washington-Wirt 

Interstate Planning 

Commission 

39169 Wayne Statewide 

39171 Williams Statewide 

39173 Wood Toledo 

Toledo Metropolitan Area 

Council of Governments 

Sujatha Mohanakrishnan 

39175 Wyandot Statewide 

NOTE: Complete MPO information can be found at, 

www.dot.state.oh.us/urban/mpomap.htm and at 

www.dot.state.oh.us/urban/mpolist.htm#Cleveland . 

SECTION 5

MARINE, AIRCRAFT and RAIL (MAR) SOURCES 

MAR sources are non-road sources which are significant enough in terms of emissions 

to be considered separately from the rest of the non-road sources. The MAR inventory 

consists of commercial marines, aircraft and locomotive sources. The marine and 

locomotive inventory is generated by Environ1

 under contract with LADCO and the 

aircraft inventory is generated by Ohio EPA. 

5.1 Marine Vessel Sources 

The approach to commercial marine emission estimates needed to be flexible because 

the activity data was available in many formats. Emission estimates were determined 

either by multiplying engine power, load factor, hours per year of operation, or on the 

basis of the number of gallons of fuel consumed. 

Emissions were determined for ten subclasses of vessel types: Deep draft vessels 

(DDV) at port, DDV mid-late, push boats (rivers/lakes), tugs, ferries, other special 

(excursion) vessels, support vessels, dredges, commercial fishing, and military vessels 

(Coast Guard). These were linked to various Ohio lakes and rivers. 

Because of the large variety of methodologies employed, inventory tables for the ten 

subcategories are detailed in the complete inventory prepared and published by 

ENVIRON International Corporation: LADCO 2005 COMMERCIAL MARINE 

EMISSIONS, by Christian E. Lindhjem, March, 2007. 

Emission totals produced by ENVIRON were provided to LADCO to submit to EPA for 

Ohio’s State Implementation Plan (SIP). 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 114
44

5.2 Rail Sources 

The primary activity unit used to determine emissions is gallons of fuel consumed. 

Emission rates were derived from EPA documents provided as support documentation 

for the 1997 locomotive emission standards (EPA, 1997). Gallons of fuel consumed 

were based on rail activity. 

Rail activity was broken down into four Source Category Codes (SCC). Class I, linehaul rail: Large interstate railroad companies like Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern. 

Class I,II, III, switching rail: Yard operations. Class II, III line haul: Regional and local 

railroads. And Passenger rail: AMTRAK. 

Class I, line-haul represents 84.3% of fuel used and the largest emission’s category. 

The complete emission’s inventory was prepared and published by ENVIRON 

International Corporation: LADCO 2005 LOCOMOTIVE EMISSIONS, by Christian E. 

Lindhjem, February, 2007. 

Emission totals produced by ENVIRON were provided to LADCO to submit to EPA for 

Ohio’s State Implementation Plan (SIP). 

EPA. 1997: "Locomotive Emission Standards." Regulatory Support Document, United States 

Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Mobile Sources, April. And EPA 1997, Emission Factors for 

Locomotives," Environmental Protection Agency, EPA420-F-97-051, December. 

5.3 Aircraft Sources 

INTRODUCTION: 

 The aircraft emission’s inventory is derived by taking the number of Landings and 

Take Offs (LTOs) per year and multiplying by an emission factor. In the Ohio inventory 

when specific aircraft models and engine type emission factors are known they were 

used. For the rest of the inventory the emission factors came from USEPA’s fleet 

average emissions data. Those results are then compiled as tons per year per pollutant 

by county. The following describes the components, methodology, and concludes with 

a description of an Access based aircraft emission calculator. 

COMPONENTS: 

 I. Ohio Airports: 

 A list of both towered and non-towered airports in Ohio is obtained from the Ohio 

Department of Transportation. See: www.dot.state.oh.us/aviation/ In conversation 

with ODOT two individuals stated that the 164 airports listed covered over 90% of the 

airports in Ohio. See Table 1. 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 115
45

 II. Number of Operations/LTOs by Airport/County: 

 The ODOT list contained the number of operations a year per airport. An 

operation is either a landing or a take-off. A Landing and Take Off (LTO) is required for 

FAA EDMS calculations. LTOs were derived simply by dividing the number of 

operations by two. These were totaled by county. 

Table 5-1 Number of operations and LTOs for 2005

County Airport Name ID Total Operations LTOs/Year 

Adams Alexander Salamon AMT 5210 2605 

Allen Allen County AOH 32500 16250 

Ashland Ashland County 3G4 49240 24620 

Ashtabula Ashtabula County HZY 16886 8443 

Ashtabula Germack 7D9 840 420 

Athens Ohio University UNI 51600 25800 

Auglaize Neil Armstrong AXV 29456 14728 

Belmont Barnesville-Bradfield 6G5 10150 5075 

Belmont Alderman 2P7 6150 3075 

Brown Brown County GEO 5157 2578.5 

Butler Butler County Regional HAO 61687 30843.5 

Butler Hook Field Municipal MWO 40050 20025 

Butler Miami University OXD 16708 8354 

Carroll Carroll County -Tolson TSO 34950 17475 

Carroll Parsons 5D6 2674 1337 

Champaign Grimes Field I74 23480 11740 

Champaign Weller 38I 300 150 

Clark Springfield-Beckley Municipal SGH 64033 32016.5 

Clark Mad River I54 15350 7675 

Clermont Clermont County I69 35741 17870.5 

Clinton Airborne Airpark ILN 52000 26000 

Clinton Clinton Field I66 29360 14680 

Clinton Hollister Field 2B6 161 80.5 

Columbiana Columbiana County Ø2G 31146 15573 

Columbiana Koons 8G8 2546 1273 

Coshocton Richard Downing I4Ø 19550 9775 

Coshocton Tri-City 8ØG 8085 4042.5 

Crawford Port Bucyrus 17G 24871 12435.5 

Crawford Galion Municipal GQQ 5216 2608 

Cuyahoga Burke Lakefront BKL 97100 48550 

Cuyahoga Cleveland-Hopkins International CLE 234356 117178 

Cuyahoga Cuyahoga County CGF 79774 39887 

Darke Darke County VES 9238 4619 

Defiance Defiance Memorial DFI 9130 4565 

Delaware Delaware Municipal DLZ 39300 19650 

Delaware Packer 5E9 3181 1590.5 

Erie Hinde 88D 1350 675 

Erie Kelleys Island 89D 25495 12747.5 

Erie Griffing-Sandusky SKY 112100 56050 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 116
46

Erie Wakeman I64 17324 8662 

Fairfield Miller's Farm 7B4 360 180 

Fairfield Fairfield County LHQ 43066 21533 

Fayette Fayette County I23 29405 14702.5 

Franklin Ohio State University OSU 134459 67229.5 

Franklin Port Columbus International CMH 218438 109219 

Franklin Rickenbacker International LCK 96200 48100 

Franklin Bolton Field TZR 69149 34574.5 

Franklin Columbus Southwest Ø4I 11833 5916.5 

Franklin Darby Dan 6I6 11260 5630 

Fulton Fulton County USE 21123 10561.5 

Gallia Gallia-Meigs Regional GAS 12200 6100 

Geauga Gates 7D8 4200 2100 

Geauga Geauga County 7G8 5350 2675 

Greene Greene County - Lewis A. Jackson I19 37400 18700 

Greene Bloom 14I 100 50 

Guernsey Cambridge Municipal CDI 6040 3020 

Hamilton Lunken LUK 129430 64715 

Hamilton Blue Ash ISZ 35000 17500 

Hamilton Cincinnati West I67 30197 15098.5 

Hancock Bluffton 5G7 71980 35990 

Hancock Findlay FDY 19800 9900 

Hancock Priebe 7D5 3850 1925 

Hardin Ada ØD7 331 165.5 

Hardin Hardin County I95 6562 3281 

Hardin Elliott's Landing O74 1560 780 

Harrison Harrison County 8G6 11900 5950 

Henry Henry County 7W5 15637 7818.5 

Highland Highland County HOC 18325 9162.5 

Holmes Holmes County 1ØG 21400 10700 

Huron Huron County 5A1 10100 5050 

Huron Willard 8G1 2715 1357.5 

Jackson James A. Rhodes I43 6053 3026.5 

Jefferson Jefferson County Airpark 2G2 15969 7984.5 

Jefferson Eddie Dew Memorial 1G8 3540 1770 

Knox Knox County 4I3 20150 10075 

Knox Wynkoop 6G4 4691 2345.5 

Lake Concord Airpark 2G1 4510 2255 

Lake Willoughby Lost Nation Municipal LNN 45085 22542.5 

Lawrence Lawrence County Airpark HTW 41910 20955 

Licking Newark-Heath VTA 12457 6228.5 

Logan Bellefontaine Regional EDJ 8325 4162.5 

Lorain Columbia 4G8 5150 2575 

Lorain Elyria 1G1 14300 7150 

Lorain Lagrange 92D 1155 577.5 

Lorain Lorain County Regional LPR 62000 31000 

Lorain Reader-Botsford Airfield 67D 18700 9350 

Lucas Toledo Express TOL 94600 47300 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 117
47

Madison Madison County UYF 41410 20705 

Mahoning Salem Airpark 38D 16920 8460 

Mahoning Tri-City 3G6 10555 5277.5 

Mahoning Elser Metro 4G4 49232 24616 

Mahoning Lansdowne Ø4G 750 375 

Marion Marion Municipal MNN 42650 21325 

Medina Medina Municipal 1G5 79685 39842.5 

Medina Wadsworth Municipal 3G3 41025 20512.5 

Medina Weltzien Skypark 15G 79130 39565 

Mercer Lakefield CQA 16212 8106 

Miami Hartzell Field I17 10200 5100 

Miami Troy Skypark 37I 4264 2132 

Miami Waco Field 1WF 0 0 

Monroe Monroe County 4G5 3324 1662 

Montgomery Brookville Air-Park I62 29359 14679.5 

Montgomery James M. Cox Dayton Intl DAY 134524 67262 

Montgomery Dayton Wright Brothers MGY 89045 44522.5 

Montgomery Moraine Airpark I73 12938 6469 

Montgomery Dahio Trotwood I44 1853 926.5 

Montgomery Phillipsburg 3I7 68000 34000 

Morgan Morgan County I71 5725 2862.5 

Morrow Morrow County 4I9 19108 9554 

Muskingum Zanesville Municipal ZZV 33312 16656 

Muskingum Parr 42I 16150 8075 

Noble Noble County - Mike Brienza Field I1Ø 5950 2975 

Ottawa Middle Bass-East Point 3W9 1300 650 

Ottawa Middle Bass Island 3T7 6500 3250 

Ottawa North Bass Island 3X5 1000 500 

Ottawa Carl R. Keller Field PCW 20890 10445 

Ottawa Put-In-Bay 3W2 15140 7570 

Paulding Paulding 2H8 2100 1050 

Perry Crooksville I84 400 200 

Perry Perry County I86 4550 2275 

Pickaway Pickaway County CYO 35450 17725 

Pickaway Clarks Dream Strip Ø3I 2770 1385 

Pike Pike County EOP 2012 1006 

Portage Freedom Air Field 7D6 1623 811.5 

Portage Farview 86D 3353 1676.5 

Portage Mills 7E3 1050 525 

Portage Portage County 29G 9621 4810.5 

Putnam Ruhe's R47 13250 6625 

Putnam Putnam County OWX 11910 5955 

Putnam Ohio Dusting Co. 6C2 2995 1497.5 

Richland Mansfield Lahm Regional MFD 57518 28759 

Richland Shelby Community 12G 2012 1006 

Ross Ross County RZT 50150 25075 

Sandusky Fremont 14G 37450 18725 

Sandusky Sandusky County Regional S24 6148 3074 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 118
48

Scioto Greater Portsmouth Regional PMH 45830 22915 

Seneca Bandit Field 5D9 140 70 

Seneca Fostoria Metropolitan FZI 7900 3950 

Seneca Weiker 82D 320 160 

Seneca Seneca County 16G 60165 30082.5 

Shelby Sidney Municipal I12 20500 10250 

Stark Barber 2D1 13750 6875 

Stark Miller Airport 4G3 8000 4000 

Stark Beach City 2D7 6112 3056 

Summit Akron Fulton International AKR 26000 13000 

Summit Akron-Canton Regional CAK 120441 60220.5 

Summit Mayfield 1D4 450 225 

Summit Kent State University 1G3 72500 36250 

Trumbull Braceville 41N 425 212.5 

Trumbull Warren 62D 14738 7369 

Trumbull Youngstown-Warren Regional YNG 98298 49149 

Tuscarawas Harry Clever Field PHD 54880 27440 

Union Union County MRT 31886 15943 

Van Wert Van Wert County VNW 20516 10258 

Vinton Vinton County 22I 5225 2612.5 

Warren Warren County I68 24951 12475.5 

Warren Red Stewart Airfield 4ØI 16800 8400 

Wayne Wayne County BJJ 96520 48260 

Williams Williams County ØG6 10010 5005 

Wood Wood County 1GØ 27405 13702.5 

Wood Bordner 3D8 2200 1100 

Wood Deshler Municipal 6D7 2000 1000 

Wood Metcalf TDZ 90700 45350 

Wyandot Wyandot County 56D 7410 3705 

III. Aircraft Models and Number of LTO/yr: 

Specific aircraft models by airport (generally the larger airports) is obtained from “Table 

7” provided by the United States Department of Transportation, Office of Airline 

Information. This provided the number of LTO’s for each aircraft model per year per 

airport. 

Table 2. Sample from “Table 7.” This is the all community total of aircraft models for 

the Akron/Canton area. “All Service” departures were used as the number of LTOs per 

year for that model. Listed in the original table are aircraft model by airport and number 

of services/LTOs. 

 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 119
49

TOTAL DEPARTURES PERFORMD

Aircraft Scheduled Non-Sched All 

Model Service Service Service 

A-318 1 1 

A319 384 384 

BOEING 717-200 3850 3850 

BOEING 727-100 1 1 

BOEING 727-200 5 5 

BOEING 737-100/200 74 74 

BOEING 737-200C 3 3 6 

BOEING 737-300 2 2 

BOEING 737-700/LR 212 212 

BOEING 737-800 5 5 

BOEING 757-200 4 4 

BOEING 767-300/ER 4 4 

CANADAIR RJ-100/ER 542 3 545 

CANADAIR RJ-700 2881 2881 

CONVAIR CV-580 3 3 

DASSAULT FALCON 7 7 

DHC8-100 DASH 8 2 2 

DOUGLAS DC-9-15F 13 13 

DOUGLAS DC-9-30 6 6 

EMBRAER-145 144 144 

RJ-200ER/RJ-440 5519 5519 

SAAB-FAIRCHD 340/B 1804 1804 

ALL TYPES 15342 130 15472 

IV. Emission Factors: 

 Where there was specific aircraft model data the emission factors were derived 

using the FAA’s Emission Dispersion Modeling System (EDMS). EDMS is a combined 

emissions and dispersion model for assessing air quality at civilian airports and military 

air bases. The model was developed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in 

cooperation with the United States Air Force (USAF). The model is used to produce an 

inventory of emissions generated by sources on and around the airport or air base, and 

to calculate pollutant concentrations in these environments. 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 120
50

Table 5-2 EDMS Aircraft Emissions 

Emissions provided by Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. (The few 

aircraft in Ohio not included in the table had emissions derived by EDMS 5.0 in-house.) 

EDMS Aircraft Emissions/LTO by Aircraft Type 

EDMS 4.5 Emissions Inventory Report of 2005 Aircraft Inventory Emissions Factors

 

Year 2005 Lbs Emitted Per LTO 

Aircraft Type CO NOx HC VOC SO2 PM2.5 PM10 

A- 318 19.8 18.7 4.0 4.4 1.5 0.0 0.0 

A-300-600/R/CF/RCF 27.1 56.4 2.0 2.2 4.0 0.2 0.2 

A-300B/C/F-100/200 30.2 52.5 3.5 3.7 3.3 0.2 0.2 

A-310-200C/F 32.6 52.5 7.3 7.9 3.3 0.2 0.2 

A-319 19.8 18.7 4.0 4.4 1.5 0.0 0.0 

A320-100/200 13.7 19.8 1.3 1.3 1.8 0.2 0.2 

A-321 16.8 36.8 3.1 3.3 2.2 0.0 0.0 

A-330-200 29.8 61.5 0.4 0.4 4.4 0.2 0.2 

AVROLINER RJ85 24.7 9.5 2.9 3.3 1.3 0.2 0.2 

BAE-146-300 24.7 9.0 3.1 3.3 1.3 0.2 0.2 

BEECH 1900 A/B/C 11.0 1.1 3.3 3.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 

BEECH KINGAIR C90 1.8 0.9 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 

717-200 11.7 23.4 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 

727-100 21.4 23.1 4.6 5.1 2.9 0.4 0.4 

727-100C/QC 44.5 19.8 4.6 5.1 2.4 1.1 1.1 

727-200 19.6 27.3 2.9 3.1 3.3 1.1 1.1 

737-100/200 14.1 16.1 2.2 2.4 2.0 0.7 0.7 

737-200C 13.9 17.4 6.8 7.5 2.0 0.9 0.9 

737-300 28.7 15.9 1.8 2.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 

737-400 26.5 18.5 1.5 1.5 1.8 0.0 0.0 

737-500 24.7 21.2 1.3 1.3 2.0 0.0 0.0 

737-700/LR 17.6 20.1 2.0 2.0 1.8 0.4 0.4 

737-800 15.7 27.1 1.5 1.8 2.0 0.7 0.7 

737-900 15.7 27.1 1.5 1.8 2.0 0.7 0.7 

747-100 252.6 108.5 106.7 116.8 7.1 0.4 0.4 

747-200/300 60.6 104.7 7.1 7.7 6.8 0.7 0.7 

747-400 67.0 105.6 5.7 6.4 7.3 0.7 0.7 

757-200 24.7 35.7 2.0 2.2 2.6 0.4 0.4 

757-300 27.1 33.1 0.4 0.4 3.1 0.2 0.2 

767-200/ER 32.6 52.5 7.3 7.9 3.3 0.2 0.2 

767-300/ER 32.0 62.2 2.6 2.9 4.0 0.4 0.4 

777 32.8 85.1 5.1 5.7 4.4 0.4 0.4 

CANADAIR RJ100/ER 16.3 4.9 1.5 1.8 0.7 0.0 0.0 

CANADAIR RJ-700 12.6 9.3 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 

CESSNA 208 1.1 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

CONVAIR CV-580 36.2 0.9 8.8 9.5 0.7 0.0 0.0 

DASSAULT FALCON 13.7 2.6 2.4 2.6 0.2 0.0 0.0 

DHC8-100 DASH 8 5.1 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 

DORNIER 328 JET 1.3 6.6 11.9 12.6 0.7 0.0 0.0 

DOUGLAS DC-10-10 102.5 76.7 38.6 42.1 4.2 0.0 0.0 

DOUGLAS DC-10-30 45.4 78.7 5.3 5.7 5.1 0.4 0.4 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 121
51

DOUGLAS DC-10-40 131.8 81.8 30.2 33.1 6.0 0.7 0.7 

DOUGLAS DC-8-63 263.5 25.6 219.1 239.9 4.2 5.1 5.1 

DOUGLAS DC-8-71 53.6 34.6 3.1 3.3 3.7 0.0 0.0 

DOUGLAS DC-8-73 53.6 34.6 3.1 3.3 3.7 0.0 0.0 

DOUGLAS DC-9-10 14.1 14.6 3.7 4.0 1.8 0.2 0.2 

DOUGLAS DC-9-15F 14.1 14.6 3.7 4.0 1.8 0.2 0.2 

DOUGLAS DC-9-30 14.1 14.6 3.7 4.0 1.8 0.2 0.2 

DOUGLAS DC-9-40 39.7 16.5 10.8 11.9 2.0 1.3 1.3 

DOUGLAS DC-9-50 12.6 20.1 1.8 1.8 2.2 0.9 0.9 

EMBRAER-135 12.8 5.5 1.1 1.3 0.7 0.0 0.0 

EMBRAER-140 13.7 6.0 1.3 1.3 0.7 0.0 0.0 

EMBRAER-145 6.4 6.8 1.1 1.1 0.7 0.0 0.0 

EMBRAER-170 9.0 9.7 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 

F28-4000/6000 76.7 10.4 77.2 84.4 1.5 0.0 0.0 

JETSTREAM 41 4.6 2.0 0.4 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.0 

L-101101/100/200 33.3 112.0 6.2 6.8 5.7 1.3 1.3 

LEAR-25 75.2 0.7 7.9 8.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 

LOCKHEED L100-30 48.7 9.9 19.6 21.4 1.8 0.0 0.0 

MD-11 47.8 93.3 4.0 4.4 6.0 0.7 0.7 

MD-80, 1, 2, 3, 7, 8 16.3 20.3 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.2 0.2 

MD-90 12.1 23.8 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.2 0.2 

RJ-200ER/RJ-440 16.3 4.9 1.5 1.8 0.7 0.0 0.0 

SAAB-FAIRCHD 340/B 4.2 1.5 1.5 1.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 

NOTE: Where specific aircraft model data was not available fleet emissions were used. 

EPA default fleet average emission factors were taken from “Documentation for Aircraft, 

Commercial Marine Vessel, ,Locomotive, and Other Non-road Components of the 

National Emissions Inventory. 2005, see Appendix A, Aircraft Emission Estimation 

Methodology.” Specific model LTOs were subtracted from county LTO totals to 

eliminate double counting those LTOs. 

Table 5-3 Fleet Emission Factor Categories 

Fleet emission factors were broken down into three categories. Itinerant General, Local 

General, and Military. 

Table 5-3a Fleet Average Emission Factors for Itinerant General Aircraft. 

(Taken from : Table A-5) 

Pollutant Emission Factors (lbs/LTO) 

HC 1.234 

NOx 0.158 

CO 28.13 

SOx 0.015 

PM10 0.60333 

Note: Air taxi HC emissions * VOC/HC (0.9914) conversion factor = air taxi VOC estimate

 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 122
52

Table 5-3b Fleet Average Emission Factors for Local General Aircraft. 

(Taken From: Table A-11) 

Pollutant Emission Factors (lbs/LTO) 

HC 0.394 

NOx 0.065 

CO 12.014 

SOx 0.01 

PM10 0.2367 

Note: GA HC emissions * VOC/HC(0.9708) conversion factor = GA VOC estimate 

Table 5-3c Fleet Average Emission Factors for Military Aircraft. 

(Taken from: Table A-17) 

Pollutant Emission Factors (lbs/LTO

HC 1.234 

NOx 0.158 

CO 28.13 

SOx 0.015 

PM10 0.60333 

Note: Military HC emissions * VOC/HC(1.1046) conversion factor = Military VOC estimate 

METHODOLOGY 

Introduction 

The following information was considered in the development of emission estimates: 

1. Commercial scheduled and non-scheduled aircraft air carrier activity and 

commercial air freight activity by aircraft model types, 

2. General aviation and air taxi annual local and itinerant operations for year 2005, 

3. Military annual local and itinerant operations for year 2005. 

Due to the need to have aircraft operations information expressed as landing/take off 

(LTO) cycles, the following assumptions were made: 

1. For commercial aircraft and commercial air freight activity, the number of annual 

aircraft annual LTO cycles was assumed to be equal to the number of 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 123
53

departures. The daily LTO cycle frequency was then obtained by dividing the 

yearly LTO cycles by 365. 

 

2. For general aircraft annual local and itinerant airport operations, each respective 

operations total was divided by 2 to obtain the corresponding year local and 

itinerant LTO cycles. The expected daily local and itinerant LTO cycles then 

were obtained by dividing these annual totals by 365. 

3. For military annual local and itinerant operations, each respective operations total 

was divided by 2 to obtain the corresponding year local and itinerant LTO cycles. 

The expected military daily local and itinerant LTO cycles then were obtained by 

dividing these annual totals by 365. 

Airport LTO cycles were further categorized into commercial aircraft by plane and 

engine type, general aviation itinerant aircraft of unknown aircraft type, general aviation 

local aircraft of unknown aircraft type, and military aircraft. This was necessary in order 

to utilize the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration EDMS 

Emissions and Dispersion Modeling System. Commercial and air freight aircraft 

emission factors per LTO cycle were determined using EDMS for each commercial 

aircraft type models where possible were used at each towered airport. Default 

commercial aircraft engine type, and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) default 

time in mode values for takeoff, approach, and landing roll times were used in the 

EDMS model simulations. 

For those aircraft types that could not be determined using the EDMS emissions model, 

aircraft emission factors based upon EPA alternative fleet average procedures were 

then used to estimate their emissions. These included general aviation and air taxi 

itinerant aircraft of unknown aircraft type, general aviation local aircraft of unknown 

aircraft type, and military aircraft. Conversion from total hydrocarbons to volatile organic 

compounds was performed and based upon the EPA guidance. 

APPROACH 

1. A list of more than 90% of the airports was obtained from the Ohio Department of 

Transportation. These were classed by airport, county, aircraft flight classification, and 

the total number of operations per year. 

2. The number of operations (a landing or a take off) were then divided by two giving 

the number of LTOs per year per airport. These airports were combined by county for 

the total number of LTOs per year, per county. 

3. In dialog with ODOT it was determined that the following Ohio flight groups of aircraft 

be combined to match the three categories used by the USEPA in calculating 

emissions. 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 124
54

Itinerant (General, air carrier, commuter, air taxi, general aviation itinerant) 

Local (General aviation local) 

Military (Military) 

4. LTOs for specific models of aircraft per airport were taken from the FAA Table 7. 

See Table 2 above. These were then combined to give the number of LTOs per aircraft 

model per county. Specific model LTOs were subtracted from county totals to avoid 

double counting those LTOs. 

5. Emission factors were determined from the FAA’s EDMS program for specific aircraft 

model and engine type. See IV. Emission factors above. The aircraft emission table 

provided by Michigan has the emission factors for most of the aircraft flown in Ohio. . 

Where specific aircraft model data was not available USEPA average fleet emissions 

were used. 

6. Emission factors times LTOs by county yielded tons per year per county. 

Table 5-4 Pollutant by County (Sample)

County POLLUTANT ACTIVITY(LTOS/YEAR) ACTIVITY(LTOS/DAY) EMISSIONS(TON/YEAR) 

ADAMS CO 2605 7.136986 24.552325 

ADAMS HC 2605 7.136986 0.977285 

ADAMS NOX 2605 7.136986 0.136045 

ADAMS PM10-PRI 2605 7.136986 0.513114825 

ADAMS PM25-PRI 2605 7.136986 0 

ADAMS SOX 2605 7.136986 0.0157875 

ADAMS VOC 2605 7.136986 0.96314234 

ALLEN CO 16250 44.52055 147.945065 

ALLEN HC 16250 44.52055 5.841097 

ALLEN NOX 16250 44.52055 0.827189 

ALLEN PM10-PRI 16250 44.52055 3.081191265 

ALLEN PM25-PRI 16250 44.52055 0 

ALLEN SOX 16250 44.52055 0.0984575 

ALLEN VOC 16250 44.52055 5.769568254 

ASHLAND CO 24620 67.45205 173.67794 

ASHLAND HC 24620 67.45205 6.19414 

ASHLAND NOX 24620 67.45205 0.94895 

ASHLAND PM10-PRI 24620 67.45205 3.532515 

ASHLAND PM25-PRI 24620 67.45205 0 

ASHLAND SOX 24620 67.45205 0.1311 

ASHLAND VOC 24620 67.45205 6.07175247 

ASHTABULA CO 8863 24.28219 78.115087 

ASHTABULA HC 8863 24.28219 3.042551 

ASHTABULA NOX 8863 24.28219 0.431593 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 125
55

ASHTABULA PM10-PRI 8863 24.28219 1.623493455 

ASHTABULA PM25-PRI 8863 24.28219 0 

ASHTABULA SOX 8863 24.28219 0.0520325 

ASHTABULA VOC 8863 24.28219 2.99420213 

ATHENS CO 25800 70.68493 196.874985 

ATHENS HC 25800 70.68493 7.267183 

ATHENS NOX 25800 70.68493 1.081521 

ATHENS PM10-PRI 25800 70.68493 4.037266335 

ATHENS PM25-PRI 25800 70.68493 0 

ATHENS SOX 25800 70.68493 0.1420925 

ATHENS VOC 25800 70.68493 7.128180006 

7. Emissions were then summed by pollutants in each county by SCC aircraft category 

type so data could be provided to LADCO in the EPA prescribed NEI – NIF format. 

DATA ERROR 

The first aircraft emission inventory submitted to LADCO in April, 2007 contained an 

error. The inventory submitted in May, 2007 has the error corrected. The error was the 

result of a carry-over function in Access that picked up the number of operations as 

instead of LTOs....which made the inventory exactly twice as large as what it really was. 

ACCESS CALCULATOR 

Introduction: 

Our database programmer set up Access application to calculate Ohio’s aircraft 

emission inventory, and export those results to Excel. His utility allows for easy 

modification of the aircraft data to match future data scenarios. Output to Excel also 

allows for additional data manipulation and importation. 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 126
56

Interface: 

Through this interface the following sets of data can be edited/updated: Airport activity, 

emission factors, specific airport emissions, state/county FIPS, detailed aircraft 

information, airport information, and aircraft SCCs. Once the final emissions have been 

calculated and summed, then the data can be export via the export function on the Main 

Menu. 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 127
Appendix C

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 128
This page left intentionally blank

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 129
BROOKE-HANCOCK-JEFFERSON

TRANSPORTATION STUDY

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 2011-1

Transportation Air Quality Analysis and Technical Documentation

For the Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

State Implementation Plan Inventory Mobile Emission Estimates

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard

Submitted: May 2011

Revised: February 2012

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 130
Production of this Document paid for by funds from the U.S. Federal Highway Administration, Federal 

Transit Administration, Ohio Department of Transportation, West Virginia Department of Transportation 

and dues from BHJ member governments.

Prepared By:

Brooke-Hancock-Jefferson Metropolitan Planning Commission

The Metropolitan Planning Organization for

Steubenville, Ohio-Weirton, WV Area

124 North Fourth Street, 2nd Floor

Steubenville, OH 43952

740/282-3685

304/797-9666

740/282-1821 FAX

Email: mikepap@bhjmpc.org Website: www.bhjmpc.org

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 131
Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page i

BROOKE-HANCOCK-JEFFERSON TRANSPORTATION STUDY

Transportation Air Quality Analysis and Technical Documentation

For the Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

State Implementation Plan Inventory Mobile Emission Estimates

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction..................................................................................................................................... Page 1

On Road Mobile Emission Summary ............................................................................................. Page 3

Latest Planning Assumptions.......................................................................................................... Page 5

Travel Demand Modeling - Analysis Years ................................................................................... Page 5

Social-Economic Demographics..................................................................................................... Page 5

Emission Factor Generation............................................................................................................ Page 9

Temperature and Relative Humidity............................................................................................... Page 11

Ramp Fraction................................................................................................................................. Page 12

Source Type Population.................................................................................................................. Page 12

Vehicle Age Distribution ................................................................................................................ Page 12

Road Type Distribution................................................................................................................... Page 21

Post Processing ............................................................................................................................... Page 22

Appendix A – Interagency Consultation Documentation

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 132
Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 133
Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page ii

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1 BHJ Region On-Road Mobile Emissions by State ................................................. Page 3

Table 2 BHJ Region On-Road Mobile Emissions by County ............................................. Page 4

Table 3 BHJ Region Representative Social-Economic Demographic Variables 

By County 2005-2020............................................................................................. Page 7

Table 4 Moves Inputs........................................................................................................... Page 9

Table 5 Average Temperature and Relative Humidity Data................................................ Page 11

Table 6 Ramp Fractions....................................................................................................... Page 11

Table 7 Source Type Population for Year 2005 .................................................................. Page 12

Table 8 Vehicle Age Distribution for Jefferson County, OH .............................................. Page 13

Table 9 Vehicle Age Distribution for Brooke/Hancock County, WV................................. Page 17

Table 10 Road Type Distribution for Brooke-Hancock-Jefferson Non-Attainment Area..... Page 21

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1 BHJ Geographic Area Fine Particulate Matter Non-Attainment Area Boundary

................................................................................................................................. Page 2

Figure 2 BHJ Geographic Area Covered by Travel Demand Model and Traffic Analysis Zone 

Structure.................................................................................................................. Page 8

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 134
Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 135
Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page iii

SELECTED ABBREVIATIONS & ACRONYMS

BHJ – Brooke-Hancock-Jefferson Metropolitan 

Planning Commission

CFR – Code of Federal Regulations

FHWA – Federal Highway Administration; 

FTA – Federal Transit Administration; 

LRTP – Long Range Transportation Plan

MOBILE6 – Mobile Source Emission Factor 

Model

MOU – Memorandum of Understanding

MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization

MVEB – Motor Vehicle Emissions Budget

NAAQS – National Ambient Air Quality 

Standard

NOX – Nitrogen Oxides

ODOT – Ohio Department of Transportation

OEPA – Ohio Environmental Protection 

Agency

PM – Particulate Matter

PM2.5 - Particulate Matter with an aerodynamic 

diameter less than 2.5 microns (often referred to 

as Fine Particulate Matter)

PM10 – Particulate Matter with an aerodynamic 

diameter less than 10 microns

SIP – State Implementation Plan

STIP – Statewide Transportation Improvement 

Program

TAZs – Traffic Analysis Zones

TCM – Transportation Control Measure

TDM – Travel Demand Model

TIP – Transportation Improvement Program in a 

Metropolitan Planning Area

USEPA – United States Environmental 

Protection Agency

VMT – Vehicle Miles of Travel

VOC – Volatile Organic Compounds

WVDEP – West Virginia Department of 

Environmental Protection

WVDOT – West Virginia Department of 

Transportation

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 136
Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 137
REVISION HISTORY

February 24, 2012

Edit Page 1; Introduction; Paragraph #1 Revise paragraph into two sentences.

Edit Page 3; On Road Emission Summary Paragraph #1; Insert Maintenance Year 2022 with 2025

Revise; Table 1; BHJ Region on-Road Mobile Emissions by State; Add Maintenance Year 2025

Revise Page 4; Table 2; BHJ Region on-Road Mobile Emissions by County; Add Maintenance Year 

2025

Revise Page 5; Travel Demand Modeling - Analysis Years; Add Analysis Year 2025 – Maintenance 

Year

Revise Page 9; Emission Factor Generation; Paragraph #1 Add 2025

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 138
Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 139
Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page 1

Transportation Air Quality Analysis and Technical Documentation

For the Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

State Implementation Plan Inventory Mobile Emission Estimates

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard

INTRODUCTION

This memorandum documents the air quality analyses and underlying planning assumptions performed 

for the Annual PM2.5 on-road mobile source emission inventories for the Weirton-Steubenville, WVOH Metropolitan area State Implementation Plan (SIP). The Ohio Department of Transportation 

(ODOT), Division of Transportation System Development-Modeling and Forecasting Section and the 

Brooke-Hancock-Jefferson Planning Commission (BHJMPC) completed these analyses in coordination 

with the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA) and West Virginia Department of 

Environmental Protection (WVDEP). 

The BHJ Region is comprised of the counties of Brooke and Hancock in the north panhandle of West 

Virginia and Jefferson in east-central Ohio. On January 5, 2005, the USEPA designated all three 

counties within the BHJMPO Planning Area as non-attainment for the PM2.5 air quality standard. The 

designation became effective on April 5, 2005; 90 days after USEPA published action in the Federal 

Registry. Figure 1 displays the geographic extent of the Steubenville-Weirton, OH-WV non-attainment 

area

The BHJMPC serves as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). The MPO submitted the 

necessary Travel Demand Model networks along with all land use and social-economic demographics. 

The ODOT Modeling and Forecasting section performed the MOVES runs to generate travel demand 

model based emission factors as well as the complete air quality analyses for the metropolitan area.

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 140
Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page 2

Figure 1

BHJ GEOGRAPHIC AREA

FINE PARTICULATE MATTER

NON-ATTAINMENT AREA BOUNDARY

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 141
Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page 3

ON ROAD MOBILE EMISSION SUMMARY

The Table 1 and 2 below present a summary of the pollutant emissions including Fine Particulate Matter

(PM2.5), Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) modeled for each county that make up the BHJ 

Region. The Model Years for the demonstration includes the Base Year 2005, Attainment Year 2008 (a 

leap year), Interim Year 2015, and Maintenance Year 2025.

Table 1

BHJ REGION ON-ROAD MOBILE EMISSIONS BY STATE

PM 2.5 Analysis

STATE TOTALS

OHIO

Jefferson County

PM 2.5 NOX SO2 VMT

Year (tons/yr) (tons/yr) (tons/yr) (annual)

2005 73.17 2105.85 18.18 562,071,084

2008 60.97 1758.04 5.65 557,286,295

2015 31.88 870.17 3.93 544,597,475

2022 16.78 374.80 3.56 549,620,540

2025 16.49 322.71 3.56 572,657,778

WEST VIRGINIA

Brooke and Hancock Counties

PM 2.5 NOX SO2 VMT

Year (tons/yr) (tons/yr) (tons/yr) (annual)

2005 38.04 1023.15 13.59 393,012,357

2008 27.93 772.27 4.03 389,998,556

2015 13.50 323.71 2.87 400,179,462

2022 8.82 158.47 2.50 390,998,315

2025 8.44 114.56 2.36 391,153,545

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 142
Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page 4

Table 2

BHJ REGION ON-ROAD MOBILE EMISSIONS BY COUNTY COUNTY TOTALS

Jefferson County

PM 2.5 NOX SO2 VMT

Year (tons/yr) (tons/yr) (tons/yr) (annual)

2005 73.17 2105.85 18.18 562,071,084

2008 60.97 1758.04 5.65 557,286,295

2015 31.88 870.17 3.93 544,597,475

2022 16.78 374.80 3.56 549,620,540

2025 16.49 322.71 3.56 572,657,778

Brooke County

PM 2.5 NOX SO2 VMT

Year (tons/yr) (tons/yr) (tons/yr) (annual)

2005 19.41 540.40 7.01 212,244,639

2008 14.42 412.02 2.11 212,778,859

2015 6.97 174.71 1.51 219,881,355

2022 4.55 86.23 1.33 215,917,336

2025 4.34 62.47 1.26 216,619,184

Hancock County

PM 2.5 NOX SO2 VMT

Year (tons/yr) (tons/yr) (tons/yr) (annual)

2005 18.63 482.75 6.58 180,767,718

2008 13.51 360.25 1.92 177,219,697

2015 6.53 149.00 1.36 180,298,107

2022 4.28 72.24 1.17 175,080,979

2025 4.10 52.09 1.10 174,534,361

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 143
Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page 5

LATEST PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS

The annual PM2.5 inventory runs meet the latest planning assumption requirement. This report will 

present the latest population and land use data available that calibrated the modeling process used to 

calculate the vehicle emissions for the mobile emissions budgets as well as the input values for U.S. 

EPA’s most recent emissions software MOVES for this attainment demonstration.

A series of conference calls held in November 2010 and February 2011 by the Interagency Consultancy 

Group established two parameters. First, that this re-designation effort will require the use of U.S. 

EPA’s most recent emissions software MOVES for all mobile source emission analyses and second, the 

annual emission estimates will be based a single-season approach. The group also decided that since 

travel demand models produce average daily conditions, the daily emissions estimates are multiplied by 

365 days to produce annual emissions estimates expressed in tons per year. 

TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING - ANALYSIS YEARS

A Travel Demand Model (TDM) is the traditional forecasting tool used to examine potential changes in 

future travel patterns for a specific study area, in this case the Brooke-Hancock-Jefferson Metropolitan 

Area. The BHJ MPO, with the assistance of ODOT Modeling & Forecasting, maintains a validated 

region-wide TDM that employs a four-step modeling process consisting of trip generation, trip 

distribution, mode choice, and route assignment performed with the Cube Voyager software package. 

The model Outputs generated from the TDM are link-by-link directional 24-hour traffic volumes for 

simulating Base Year and Horizon Year travel patterns generated by the LRTP transportation network. 

The current BHJ TDM Validation Year is 2000. The model uses comparable Average Daily Traffic 

count data, updated social-economic variables for each of the analysis years by either updating existing 

or known land use commitment for 2008, 2009, and 2014, or projected 2014 and 2020 variables based 

on a straight-line extrapolation between 2009 set of variables and the Horizon Year 2030 variables.

These networks represent all planned federal-aid projects as well as any regionally significant projects 

found in the BHJ TIP and LRTP expected to be open for traffic by the end of each respective analysis 

year. 

The interagency consultation process, as previously discussed, established the following model years for 

Brooke and Hancock counties, WV and Jefferson County, OH that reflected the most recent 

correspondence from the U.S. EPA:

Analysis Year 2005 – Baseline Emissions

Analysis Year 2008 – Attainment Year

Analysis Year 2015 – Interim Year

Analysis Year 2022 – Maintenance Year

Analysis Year 2025 – Maintenance Year

SOCIAL-ECONOMIC DEMOGRAPHICS

Identifying projected growth centers and understanding urban and rural population changes are essential 

to determine future transportation needs in a given study area. Critical elements include an 

understanding of the past and anticipated future shifts in the region’s economy, population, land use 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 144
Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page 6

patterns, and other environmental factors over time. In turn, these factors are useful for predicting future 

transportation patterns and justify transportation improvements over the next twenty years.

Travel forecasting procedures require the user delineate the TDM study area into geographic areas called 

Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs). Typically, TAZs are based on factors such as land use, area types 

(urban, suburban or rural), or political government units such as cities, villages, or townships. TAZs 

represent centers of travel generators or attractors based on a set of demographic variables. The 

BHJMPO collects and reviews the TDM independent variables that characterize current and future 

estimates of the metropolitan area’s social and economic activity that may influence land-use 

development patterns. In all, there are 376 TAZs in the BHJ model represented by 60 TAZs for Brooke 

County, 78 TAZs for Hancock County, and 237 TAZs for Jefferson County. Figure 2 displays the BHJ

MPO geography covered by the Steubenville-Weirton Travel Demand Model (the entire three-county 

area) including the Traffic Analysis Zone structure. The computer-based TDM for the SteubenvilleWeirton Metropolitan Area highway network employs the following land use variables:

[AREA_TYPE] ≡ Area Type

[AVG_PARK] ≡ Average parking cost

[ENROLL] ≡ School enrollment classified by Private [ENROLL_PRIV], Public 

[ENROLL_PUB] and Post-secondary [ENROLL_UNIV] schools

[HOTEL_RM] ≡ Hotel Rooms

[MED_HHINC] ≡ Median household income

[POP] ≡ Population

[POP_18] ≡ Population 18 years or less

[POP_GRP] ≡ Population residing in Group Quarters

[TOTEMP] ≡ Total Employment grouped by the North American Industrial Classification 

System (NAICS)

[TOT_HH] ≡ Occupied housing

[TOT_VEH] ≡ Vehicles available per household

[WORKERS] ≡ Workers per household

Table 3 is a set of demographic variables developed for the most recent 2006 24-Hour PM2.5 National 

Ambient Air Quality Standard for the Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH non-attainment area compiled 

September 2010.

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 145
Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page 7

Table 3

BHJ REGION

REPRESENTATIVE SOCIAL-ECONOMIC DEMOGRAPHIC

VARIABLES BY COUNTY 2005-2020

Brooke, WV Hancock, WV Jefferson, OH

2005 Population 24,696 32,572 69,457 126,725

2005 Households 9,976 13,714 28,472 52,162

2005 Employment 8,351 12,958 23,263 44,572

2008 Population 24,602 31,971 67,643 124,216

2008 Households 9,912 13,441 27,592 50,945

2008 Employment 8,234 10,736 23,676 42,646

2014 Population 24,431 30,965 64,381 119,777

2014 Households 9,813 13,007 26,134 48,954

2014 Employment 8,145 13,047 21,819 43,011

2020 Population 24,253 29,790 60,934 114,977

2020 Households 9,694 12,488 24,532 46,714

2020 Employment 7,770 12,252 21,551 41,573

County Variable by Year Total

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 146
Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page 8

Figure 2

BHJ GEOGRAPHIC AREA

COVERED BY TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL

AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZONE STRUCTURE

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 147
Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page 9

EMISSION FACTOR GENERATION

The MOVES model generated the emission factor files were for base year-2005 and attainment year2008 representing the transportation improvement programs implemented in the BHJ Region. The 

model also generated emission factors for two future year scenarios 2015, 2022, and 2025. 

Table 4 summarizes the settings used in the MOVES run specification file and the MOVES CountyData Manager. The subsequent tables provide the specific inputs that are not using the MOVES default 

values.

Table 4

MOVES INPUTS

MOVES Version 8/26/2010

Scale Custom Domain 

MOVES Modeling Technique Emission Factor Method 

Rates per Distance 

Rates per Vehicle 

Time Span Time Aggregation: Hour 

1 Month representing average annual temperatures 

All hours of day selected 

16 speed bins 

Weekdays only 

Geographic Bounds Brooke, Hancock, and Jefferson counties

Vehicles/Equipment All source types, gasoline and diesel 

Road Type All road types including off-network 

Pollutants and Processes NOX, All PM2.5 categories, SO2

, Total Energy Consumption 

Strategies None 

General Output Units = grams, joules and miles 

Output Emissions Time = hour, Location = custom area, on-road emission rates by road 

type and source use type

Advance Performance None 

RunSpec Parameter Settings 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 148
Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page 10

Table 4 (continued)

MOVES INPUTS

Source Type Population Combination of local and default data 

Local data (Ohio and West Virginia) from motor vehicle registration 

Default data used for source types 51, 52, 53, 61, and 62 

Future year growth rate based on MPO model Household growth rate

Vehicle Type VMT Combination of local and default data 

HPMSVTypeYear VMT = daily VMT from travel demand model 

monthVMTFraction = default 

dayVMTFraction=default 

hourVMTFraction=local 

I/M Program None

Fuel Formulation Default

Fuel Supply Default 

Metereology Data Local data obtained from NOAA National Climatic Data Center. Data 

will consist of monthly high and low temperatures and daily relative 

humidity for 2002. 

Ramp Fraction Using the base year travel demand model for VHT fractions.

Future fractions will be assumed constant

Road Type Distribution Use ODOT and WV Division of Highways county summary VMT 

categorized by federal functional classes 

Age Distribution Combination of local and default data. 

Local data (Ohio and West Virginia) from motor vehicle registration 

Default data used for source types 41, 42, 43, 51, 52, 53, 61, and 62 

The same age distribution will be used for all analysis years 

Average Speed Distribution Default 

Alternative Fuel Type Default 

County Data Manager Sources 

TEMPERATURE AND RELATIVE HUMIDITY

The single season approach for temperature and relative humidity uses weather data collected by the 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Climatic Data Center (NCDC).

The data used in this report, taken from the Pittsburgh International Airport collection center, is

representative of 12 months in 2009. Data entered into a spreadsheet provided by U.S. EPA converted 

the Mobile6 to get the correct data for the MOVES model. Listed in the table below are the average 

annual hourly temperatures and relative humidity distribution profiles for the Weirton-Steubenville, 

WV-OH metropolitan area. 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 149
Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page 11

Table 5

AVERAGE TEMPERATURE AND RELATIVE HUMIDITY DATA

TIME OF DAY AVG HOURLY 

TEMPERATURE

AVG HOURLY RELATIVE 

HUMIDITY

Midnight 47.20 79.7%

1:00 AM 46.10 67.1%

2:00 AM 45.20 80.7%

3:00 AM 44.60 82.9%

4:00 AM 44.10 83.8%

5:00 AM 43.60 84.1%

6:00 AM 43.10 82.6%

7:00 AM 43.50 79.6%

8:00 AM 45.90 74.8%

9:00 AM 49.60 70.1%

10:00 AM 53.50 65.7%

11:00 AM 56.80 62.0%

NOON 59.70 59.8%

1:00 PM 61.30 58.2%

2:00 PM 61.90 57.4%

3:00 PM 62.00 57.3%

4:00 PM 61.60 58.3%

5:00 PM 60.50 61.2%

6:00 PM 58.60 65.3%

7:00 PM 56.20 69.2%

8:00 PM 53.70 66.1%

9:00 PM 51.60 74.3%

10:00 PM 50.10 75.7%

11:00 PM 48.60 78.1%

RAMP FRACTION

The Base Year Travel Demand Model used the Vehicles Hour of Travel (VHT) fractions to derive the 

Ramp Fractions shown in Table 6. The future year networks also used the base year fractions.

Table 6

RAMP FRACTIONS

roadTypeID roadDesc rampFraction

2 Rural Restricted Access 0.02

4 Urban Restricted Access 0.09

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 150
Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page 12

SOURCE TYPE POPULATION

A combination of local and MOVES default data is the Source Type Population for vehicle 

classifications. The MOVES default values provided the data for Source Type Population 51, 52, 53, 

61, and 62 while local data from Ohio and West Virginia motor vehicle registrations accounted for all 

other Source Type Population needed to run the MOVES model. Table 7 shows the Source Type 

Population identifications, the corresponding Source Type Name, and the number of vehicles analyzed 

for Jefferson County, OH and Brooke/Hancock County, WV combined.

Table 7

SOURCE TYPE POPULATION FOR YEAR 2005

Jefferson 

County, OH

Brooke/Hancock 

County, WV

11 MotorCycle 6,072 1,673

21 Passenger Car 74,051 21,369

31 Passenger Truck 39,994 17,415

32 Light Commercial Truck 3,033 2,573

41 Intercity Bus 38 15

42 Transit Bus 68 8

43 School Bus 144 99

51 Refuse truck 23 12

52 Single Unit Short-haul Truck 958 739

53 Single Unit Long-haul Truck 299 84

54 Motor Home 1,953 63

61 Combination Short-haul Truck 283 130

62 Combination Long-haul Truck 326 145

sourceTypeID sourceTypeName

sourceTypePopulation

VEHICLE AGE DISTRIBUTION

A grouping of data from Ohio and West Virginia sources along with the MOVES model defaults make 

up the Vehicle Age Distribution. MOVES default values included Vehicle Type ID 41, 42, 51, 52, 53, 

61, and 62. Local data from Ohio and West Virginia motor vehicle registrations accounted for all other 

Vehicle Type ID. Table 8 and Table 9 show the Vehicle Age Distribution for Jefferson County, OH and 

Brooke/Hancock County, WV respectively.

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 151
Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page 13

Table 8

VEHICLE AGE DISTRIBUTION FOR JEFFERSON COUNTY, OH

yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction

2005 11 0 0.0019 2005 21 9 0.0527 2005 31 18 0.0209

2005 11 1 0.0200 2005 21 10 0.0572 2005 31 19 0.0179

2005 11 2 0.0516 2005 21 11 0.0613 2005 31 20 0.0125

2005 11 3 0.0785 2005 21 12 0.0537 2005 31 21 0.0116

2005 11 4 0.0850 2005 21 13 0.0542 2005 31 22 0.0091

2005 11 5 0.0871 2005 21 14 0.0532 2005 31 23 0.0075

2005 11 6 0.0622 2005 21 15 0.0540 2005 31 24 0.0052

2005 11 7 0.0655 2005 21 16 0.0450 2005 31 25 0.0040

2005 11 8 0.0597 2005 21 17 0.0414 2005 31 26 0.0026

2005 11 9 0.0464 2005 21 18 0.0343 2005 31 27 0.0009

2005 11 10 0.0392 2005 21 19 0.0324 2005 31 28 0.0011

2005 11 11 0.0309 2005 21 20 0.0236 2005 31 29 0.0006

2005 11 12 0.0207 2005 21 21 0.0211 2005 31 30 0.0062

2005 11 13 0.0186 2005 21 22 0.0144 2005 32 0 0.0100

2005 11 14 0.0186 2005 21 23 0.0102 2005 32 1 0.0275

2005 11 15 0.0156 2005 21 24 0.0086 2005 32 2 0.0925

2005 11 16 0.0137 2005 21 25 0.0065 2005 32 3 0.0975

2005 11 17 0.0109 2005 21 26 0.0050 2005 32 4 0.0450

2005 11 18 0.0116 2005 21 27 0.0025 2005 32 5 0.0450

2005 11 19 0.0100 2005 21 28 0.0017 2005 32 6 0.0375

2005 11 20 0.0088 2005 21 29 0.0015 2005 32 7 0.0350

2005 11 21 0.0107 2005 21 30 0.0408 2005 32 8 0.0575

2005 11 22 0.0093 2005 31 0 0.0053 2005 32 9 0.0375

2005 11 23 0.0139 2005 31 1 0.0218 2005 32 10 0.0475

2005 11 24 0.0244 2005 31 2 0.0454 2005 32 11 0.0425

2005 11 25 0.0179 2005 31 3 0.0526 2005 32 12 0.0375

2005 11 26 0.0139 2005 31 4 0.0664 2005 32 13 0.0425

2005 11 27 0.0165 2005 31 5 0.0729 2005 32 14 0.0300

2005 11 28 0.0183 2005 31 6 0.0645 2005 32 15 0.0725

2005 11 29 0.0142 2005 31 7 0.0606 2005 32 16 0.0375

2005 11 30 0.1044 2005 31 8 0.0688 2005 32 17 0.0250

2005 21 0 0.0044 2005 31 9 0.0523 2005 32 18 0.0150

2005 21 1 0.0193 2005 31 10 0.0641 2005 32 19 0.0300

2005 21 2 0.0305 2005 31 11 0.0542 2005 32 20 0.0175

2005 21 3 0.0407 2005 31 12 0.0548 2005 32 21 0.0175

2005 21 4 0.0393 2005 31 13 0.0477 2005 32 22 0.0250

2005 21 5 0.0468 2005 31 14 0.0462 2005 32 23 0.0200

2005 21 6 0.0437 2005 31 15 0.0503 2005 32 24 0.0025

2005 21 7 0.0464 2005 31 16 0.0418 2005 32 25 0.0175

2005 21 8 0.0536 2005 31 17 0.0302 2005 32 26 0.0075

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 152
Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page 14

Table 8 (continued)

VEHICLE AGE DISTRIBUTION FOR JEFFERSON COUNTY, OH

yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction

2005 32 27 0.0075 2005 42 5 0.1429 2005 43 14 0.0000

2005 32 28 0.0050 2005 42 6 0.1429 2005 43 15 0.0074

2005 32 29 0.0000 2005 42 7 0.0000 2005 43 16 0.0000

2005 32 30 0.0150 2005 42 8 0.0000 2005 43 17 0.0074

2005 41 0 0.0000 2005 42 9 0.0000 2005 43 18 0.0074

2005 41 1 0.0000 2005 42 10 0.0000 2005 43 19 0.0148

2005 41 2 0.0333 2005 42 11 0.0000 2005 43 20 0.0296

2005 41 3 0.1000 2005 42 12 0.0000 2005 43 21 0.0000

2005 41 4 0.0333 2005 42 13 0.0000 2005 43 22 0.0074

2005 41 5 0.0333 2005 42 14 0.0000 2005 43 23 0.0222

2005 41 6 0.1667 2005 42 15 0.0000 2005 43 24 0.0000

2005 41 7 0.0333 2005 42 16 0.0000 2005 43 25 0.0000

2005 41 8 0.0333 2005 42 17 0.0000 2005 43 26 0.0000

2005 41 9 0.0333 2005 42 18 0.0000 2005 43 27 0.0000

2005 41 10 0.1333 2005 42 19 0.1427 2005 43 28 0.0000

2005 41 11 0.1000 2005 42 20 0.0000 2005 43 29 0.0000

2005 41 12 0.0667 2005 42 21 0.0000 2005 43 30 0.0074

2005 41 13 0.0000 2005 42 22 0.0000 2005 51 0 0.0000

2005 41 14 0.1000 2005 42 23 0.0000 2005 51 1 0.0000

2005 41 15 0.0333 2005 42 24 0.0000 2005 51 2 0.0455

2005 41 16 0.0000 2005 42 25 0.0000 2005 51 3 0.0455

2005 41 17 0.0000 2005 42 26 0.0000 2005 51 4 0.2727

2005 41 18 0.0333 2005 42 27 0.0000 2005 51 5 0.0000

2005 41 19 0.0000 2005 42 28 0.0000 2005 51 6 0.0455

2005 41 20 0.0333 2005 42 29 0.0000 2005 51 7 0.0909

2005 41 21 0.0000 2005 42 30 0.0000 2005 51 8 0.1818

2005 41 22 0.0000 2005 43 0 0.0444 2005 51 9 0.0909

2005 41 23 0.0000 2005 43 1 0.1185 2005 51 10 0.0000

2005 41 24 0.0000 2005 43 2 0.0667 2005 51 11 0.0455

2005 41 25 0.0000 2005 43 3 0.0593 2005 51 12 0.0909

2005 41 26 0.0000 2005 43 4 0.0222 2005 51 13 0.0455

2005 41 27 0.0000 2005 43 5 0.0593 2005 51 14 0.0000

2005 41 28 0.0000 2005 43 6 0.0370 2005 51 15 0.0000

2005 41 29 0.0000 2005 43 7 0.0444 2005 51 16 0.0000

2005 41 30 0.0336 2005 43 8 0.0519 2005 51 17 0.0000

2005 42 0 0.0000 2005 43 9 0.0667 2005 51 18 0.0000

2005 42 1 0.1429 2005 43 10 0.0741 2005 51 19 0.0000

2005 42 2 0.2857 2005 43 11 0.0667 2005 51 20 0.0000

2005 42 3 0.0000 2005 43 12 0.0815 2005 51 21 0.0000

2005 42 4 0.1429 2005 43 13 0.1037 2005 51 22 0.0453

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 153
Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page 15

Table 8 (continued)

VEHICLE AGE DISTRIBUTION FOR JEFFERSON COUNTY, OH

yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction

2005 51 23 0.0000 2005 53 1 0.0000 2005 54 10 0.0287

2005 51 24 0.0000 2005 53 2 0.0455 2005 54 11 0.0417

2005 51 25 0.0000 2005 53 3 0.0455 2005 54 12 0.0355

2005 51 26 0.0000 2005 53 4 0.2727 2005 54 13 0.0307

2005 51 27 0.0000 2005 53 5 0.0000 2005 54 14 0.0294

2005 51 28 0.0000 2005 53 6 0.0455 2005 54 15 0.0219

2005 51 29 0.0000 2005 53 7 0.0909 2005 54 16 0.0301

2005 51 30 0.0000 2005 53 8 0.1818 2005 54 17 0.0225

2005 52 0 0.0000 2005 53 9 0.0909 2005 54 18 0.0219

2005 52 1 0.0000 2005 53 10 0.0000 2005 54 19 0.0178

2005 52 2 0.0455 2005 53 11 0.0455 2005 54 20 0.0273

2005 52 3 0.0455 2005 53 12 0.0909 2005 54 21 0.0225

2005 52 4 0.2727 2005 53 13 0.0455 2005 54 22 0.0355

2005 52 5 0.0000 2005 53 14 0.0000 2005 54 23 0.0314

2005 52 6 0.0455 2005 53 15 0.0000 2005 54 24 0.0225

2005 52 7 0.0909 2005 53 16 0.0000 2005 54 25 0.0191

2005 52 8 0.1818 2005 53 17 0.0000 2005 54 26 0.0362

2005 52 9 0.0909 2005 53 18 0.0000 2005 54 27 0.0150

2005 52 10 0.0000 2005 53 19 0.0000 2005 54 28 0.0130

2005 52 11 0.0455 2005 53 20 0.0000 2005 54 29 0.0109

2005 52 12 0.0909 2005 53 21 0.0000 2005 54 30 0.2309

2005 52 13 0.0455 2005 53 22 0.0453 2005 61 0 0.0023

2005 52 14 0.0000 2005 53 23 0.0000 2005 61 1 0.0102

2005 52 15 0.0000 2005 53 24 0.0000 2005 61 2 0.0228

2005 52 16 0.0000 2005 53 25 0.0000 2005 61 3 0.0255

2005 52 17 0.0000 2005 53 26 0.0000 2005 61 4 0.0383

2005 52 18 0.0000 2005 53 27 0.0000 2005 61 5 0.0409

2005 52 19 0.0000 2005 53 28 0.0000 2005 61 6 0.0427

2005 52 20 0.0000 2005 53 29 0.0000 2005 61 7 0.0412

2005 52 21 0.0000 2005 53 30 0.0000 2005 61 8 0.0401

2005 52 22 0.0453 2005 54 0 0.0034 2005 61 9 0.0418

2005 52 23 0.0000 2005 54 1 0.0096 2005 61 10 0.0557

2005 52 24 0.0000 2005 54 2 0.0239 2005 61 11 0.0529

2005 52 25 0.0000 2005 54 3 0.0280 2005 61 12 0.0454

2005 52 26 0.0000 2005 54 4 0.0335 2005 61 13 0.0488

2005 52 27 0.0000 2005 54 5 0.0260 2005 61 14 0.0379

2005 52 28 0.0000 2005 54 6 0.0485 2005 61 15 0.0458

2005 52 29 0.0000 2005 54 7 0.0362 2005 61 16 0.0527

2005 52 30 0.0000 2005 54 8 0.0225 2005 61 17 0.0396

2005 53 0 0.0000 2005 54 9 0.0239 2005 61 18 0.0353

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 154
Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page 16

Table 8 (continued)

VEHICLE AGE DISTRIBUTION FOR JEFFERSON COUNTY, OH

yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction

2005 61 19 0.0352 2005 62 3 0.0470 2005 62 18 0.0221

2005 61 20 0.0283 2005 62 4 0.0359 2005 62 19 0.0221

2005 61 21 0.0340 2005 62 5 0.0331 2005 62 20 0.0083

2005 61 22 0.0314 2005 62 6 0.0249 2005 62 21 0.0166

2005 61 23 0.0224 2005 62 7 0.0276 2005 62 22 0.0166

2005 61 24 0.0242 2005 62 8 0.0331 2005 62 23 0.0166

2005 61 25 0.0157 2005 62 9 0.0663 2005 62 24 0.0083

2005 61 26 0.0147 2005 62 10 0.0884 2005 62 25 0.0083

2005 61 27 0.0077 2005 62 11 0.1050 2005 62 26 0.0110

2005 61 28 0.0068 2005 62 12 0.1243 2005 62 27 0.0028

2005 61 29 0.0059 2005 62 13 0.0746 2005 62 28 0.0028

2005 61 30 0.0538 2005 62 14 0.0635 2005 62 29 0.0000

2005 62 0 0.0028 2005 62 15 0.0414 2005 62 30 0.0109

2005 62 1 0.0028 2005 62 16 0.0442

2005 62 2 0.0028 2005 62 17 0.0359

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 155
Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page 17

Table 9

VEHICLE AGE DISTRIBUTION FOR BROOKE/HANCOCK COUNTY, WV

yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction

2005 11 0 0.0291 2005 21 9 0.0639 2005 31 18 0.0136

2005 11 1 0.0472 2005 21 10 0.0654 2005 31 19 0.0112

2005 11 2 0.0678 2005 21 11 0.0596 2005 31 20 0.0101

2005 11 3 0.0872 2005 21 12 0.0515 2005 31 21 0.0103

2005 11 4 0.0993 2005 21 13 0.0437 2005 31 22 0.0087

2005 11 5 0.0690 2005 21 14 0.0352 2005 31 23 0.0064

2005 11 6 0.0460 2005 21 15 0.0315 2005 31 24 0.0063

2005 11 7 0.0617 2005 21 16 0.0255 2005 31 25 0.0035

2005 11 8 0.0654 2005 21 17 0.0208 2005 31 26 0.0033

2005 11 9 0.0575 2005 21 18 0.0165 2005 31 27 0.0017

2005 11 10 0.0412 2005 21 19 0.0121 2005 31 28 0.0013

2005 11 11 0.0339 2005 21 20 0.0101 2005 31 29 0.0013

2005 11 12 0.0212 2005 21 21 0.0100 2005 31 30 0.0207

2005 11 13 0.0194 2005 21 22 0.0055 2005 32 0 0.0346

2005 11 14 0.0224 2005 21 23 0.0044 2005 32 1 0.0287

2005 11 15 0.0163 2005 21 24 0.0037 2005 32 2 0.0606

2005 11 16 0.0121 2005 21 25 0.0039 2005 32 3 0.0740

2005 11 17 0.0121 2005 21 26 0.0034 2005 32 4 0.0807

2005 11 18 0.0139 2005 21 27 0.0010 2005 32 5 0.0843

2005 11 19 0.0042 2005 21 28 0.0011 2005 32 6 0.0909

2005 11 20 0.0073 2005 21 29 0.0009 2005 32 7 0.0701

2005 11 21 0.0079 2005 21 30 0.0401 2005 32 8 0.0524

2005 11 22 0.0163 2005 31 0 0.0318 2005 32 9 0.0528

2005 11 23 0.0091 2005 31 1 0.0322 2005 32 10 0.0555

2005 11 24 0.0115 2005 31 2 0.0523 2005 32 11 0.0488

2005 11 25 0.0085 2005 31 3 0.0590 2005 32 12 0.0232

2005 11 26 0.0067 2005 31 4 0.0650 2005 32 13 0.0319

2005 11 27 0.0109 2005 31 5 0.0751 2005 32 14 0.0303

2005 11 28 0.0103 2005 31 6 0.0719 2005 32 15 0.0382

2005 11 29 0.0103 2005 31 7 0.0644 2005 32 16 0.0335

2005 11 30 0.0743 2005 31 8 0.0639 2005 32 17 0.0205

2005 21 0 0.0247 2005 31 9 0.0576 2005 32 18 0.0083

2005 21 1 0.0387 2005 31 10 0.0620 2005 32 19 0.0114

2005 21 2 0.0534 2005 31 11 0.0545 2005 32 20 0.0134

2005 21 3 0.0668 2005 31 12 0.0494 2005 32 21 0.0110

2005 21 4 0.0592 2005 31 13 0.0437 2005 32 22 0.0130

2005 21 5 0.0619 2005 31 14 0.0366 2005 32 23 0.0091

2005 21 6 0.0563 2005 31 15 0.0334 2005 32 24 0.0079

2005 21 7 0.0639 2005 31 16 0.0308 2005 32 25 0.0020

2005 21 8 0.0653 2005 31 17 0.0180 2005 32 26 0.0039

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 156
Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page 18

Table 9 (continued)

VEHICLE AGE DISTRIBUTION FOR BROOKE/HANCOCK COUNTY, WV

yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction

2005 32 27 0.0024 2005 42 5 0.0576 2005 43 14 0.0464

2005 32 28 0.0031 2005 42 6 0.0504 2005 43 15 0.0374

2005 32 29 0.0028 2005 42 7 0.0461 2005 43 16 0.0144

2005 32 30 0.0007 2005 42 8 0.0492 2005 43 17 0.0111

2005 41 0 0.0843 2005 42 9 0.0759 2005 43 18 0.0136

2005 41 1 0.0672 2005 42 10 0.0609 2005 43 19 0.0138

2005 41 2 0.0576 2005 42 11 0.0506 2005 43 20 0.0118

2005 41 3 0.0506 2005 42 12 0.0489 2005 43 21 0.0104

2005 41 4 0.0693 2005 42 13 0.0434 2005 43 22 0.0107

2005 41 5 0.0562 2005 42 14 0.0394 2005 43 23 0.0073

2005 41 6 0.0488 2005 42 15 0.0320 2005 43 24 0.0092

2005 41 7 0.0379 2005 42 16 0.0321 2005 43 25 0.0000

2005 41 8 0.0453 2005 42 17 0.0181 2005 43 26 0.0000

2005 41 9 0.0535 2005 42 18 0.0082 2005 43 27 0.0000

2005 41 10 0.0560 2005 42 19 0.0231 2005 43 28 0.0000

2005 41 11 0.0550 2005 42 20 0.0071 2005 43 29 0.0000

2005 41 12 0.0597 2005 42 21 0.0032 2005 43 30 0.0000

2005 41 13 0.0528 2005 42 22 0.0007 2005 51 0 0.0498

2005 41 14 0.0487 2005 42 23 0.0013 2005 51 1 0.0398

2005 41 15 0.0400 2005 42 24 0.0009 2005 51 2 0.0340

2005 41 16 0.0167 2005 42 25 0.0006 2005 51 3 0.0767

2005 41 17 0.0147 2005 42 26 0.0002 2005 51 4 0.0926

2005 41 18 0.0133 2005 42 27 0.0004 2005 51 5 0.0604

2005 41 19 0.0180 2005 42 28 0.0003 2005 51 6 0.0544

2005 41 20 0.0112 2005 42 29 0.0001 2005 51 7 0.0243

2005 41 21 0.0090 2005 42 30 0.0002 2005 51 8 0.0696

2005 41 22 0.0099 2005 43 0 0.0794 2005 51 9 0.0625

2005 41 23 0.0038 2005 43 1 0.0660 2005 51 10 0.0514

2005 41 24 0.0048 2005 43 2 0.0647 2005 51 11 0.0730

2005 41 25 0.0048 2005 43 3 0.0594 2005 51 12 0.0610

2005 41 26 0.0040 2005 43 4 0.0798 2005 51 13 0.0796

2005 41 27 0.0036 2005 43 5 0.0406 2005 51 14 0.0442

2005 41 28 0.0026 2005 43 6 0.0511 2005 51 15 0.0479

2005 41 29 0.0007 2005 43 7 0.0435 2005 51 16 0.0145

2005 41 30 0.0000 2005 43 8 0.0585 2005 51 17 0.0169

2005 42 0 0.0624 2005 43 9 0.0696 2005 51 18 0.0156

2005 42 1 0.0771 2005 43 10 0.0419 2005 51 19 0.0040

2005 42 2 0.0742 2005 43 11 0.0526 2005 51 20 0.0043

2005 42 3 0.0727 2005 43 12 0.0556 2005 51 21 0.0043

2005 42 4 0.0627 2005 43 13 0.0512 2005 51 22 0.0000

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 157
Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page 19

Table 9 (continued)

VEHICLE AGE DISTRIBUTION FOR BROOKE/HANCOCK COUNTY, WV

yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction

2005 51 23 0.0092 2005 53 1 0.1419 2005 54 10 0.0323

2005 51 24 0.0027 2005 53 2 0.1124 2005 54 11 0.0161

2005 51 25 0.0070 2005 53 3 0.0585 2005 54 12 0.0161

2005 51 26 0.0003 2005 53 4 0.0609 2005 54 13 0.0161

2005 51 27 0.0000 2005 53 5 0.1017 2005 54 14 0.0000

2005 51 28 0.0000 2005 53 6 0.0783 2005 54 15 0.0323

2005 51 29 0.0000 2005 53 7 0.0185 2005 54 16 0.0161

2005 51 30 0.0000 2005 53 8 0.0138 2005 54 17 0.0645

2005 52 0 0.0622 2005 53 9 0.0686 2005 54 18 0.0161

2005 52 1 0.0520 2005 53 10 0.0748 2005 54 19 0.0161

2005 52 2 0.0412 2005 53 11 0.0517 2005 54 20 0.0484

2005 52 3 0.0466 2005 53 12 0.0129 2005 54 21 0.0645

2005 52 4 0.0559 2005 53 13 0.0031 2005 54 22 0.0806

2005 52 5 0.0572 2005 53 14 0.0064 2005 54 23 0.0323

2005 52 6 0.0434 2005 53 15 0.0067 2005 54 24 0.0968

2005 52 7 0.0344 2005 53 16 0.0000 2005 54 25 0.0323

2005 52 8 0.0351 2005 53 17 0.0032 2005 54 26 0.0161

2005 52 9 0.0435 2005 53 18 0.0024 2005 54 27 0.0000

2005 52 10 0.0578 2005 53 19 0.0000 2005 54 28 0.0000

2005 52 11 0.0531 2005 53 20 0.0002 2005 54 29 0.0000

2005 52 12 0.0460 2005 53 21 0.0101 2005 54 30 0.1452

2005 52 13 0.0580 2005 53 22 0.0006 2005 61 0 0.0843

2005 52 14 0.0430 2005 53 23 0.0011 2005 61 1 0.0672

2005 52 15 0.0251 2005 53 24 0.0005 2005 61 2 0.0576

2005 52 16 0.0409 2005 53 25 0.0000 2005 61 3 0.0506

2005 52 17 0.0220 2005 53 26 0.0020 2005 61 4 0.0693

2005 52 18 0.0219 2005 53 27 0.0000 2005 61 5 0.0562

2005 52 19 0.0239 2005 53 28 0.0000 2005 61 6 0.0488

2005 52 20 0.0190 2005 53 29 0.0000 2005 61 7 0.0379

2005 52 21 0.0225 2005 53 30 0.0000 2005 61 8 0.0453

2005 52 22 0.0088 2005 54 0 0.0161 2005 61 9 0.0535

2005 52 23 0.0112 2005 54 1 0.0000 2005 61 10 0.0560

2005 52 24 0.0115 2005 54 2 0.0484 2005 61 11 0.0550

2005 52 25 0.0125 2005 54 3 0.0000 2005 61 12 0.0597

2005 52 26 0.0130 2005 54 4 0.0000 2005 61 13 0.0528

2005 52 27 0.0265 2005 54 5 0.0323 2005 61 14 0.0487

2005 52 28 0.0059 2005 54 6 0.0645 2005 61 15 0.0400

2005 52 29 0.0032 2005 54 7 0.0323 2005 61 16 0.0167

2005 52 30 0.0027 2005 54 8 0.0484 2005 61 17 0.0147

2005 53 0 0.1697 2005 54 9 0.0161 2005 61 18 0.0133

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 158
Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page 20

Table 9 (continued)

VEHICLE AGE DISTRIBUTION FOR BROOKE/HANCOCK COUNTY, WV

yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction

2005 61 19 0.0180 2005 62 3 0.1140 2005 62 18 0.0035

2005 61 20 0.0112 2005 62 4 0.1186 2005 62 19 0.0012

2005 61 21 0.0090 2005 62 5 0.0804 2005 62 20 0.0010

2005 61 22 0.0099 2005 62 6 0.0643 2005 62 21 0.0006

2005 61 23 0.0038 2005 62 7 0.0403 2005 62 22 0.0010

2005 61 24 0.0048 2005 62 8 0.0304 2005 62 23 0.0000

2005 61 25 0.0048 2005 62 9 0.0315 2005 62 24 0.0009

2005 61 26 0.0040 2005 62 10 0.0320 2005 62 25 0.0003

2005 61 27 0.0036 2005 62 11 0.0290 2005 62 26 0.0003

2005 61 28 0.0026 2005 62 12 0.0080 2005 62 27 0.0000

2005 61 29 0.0006 2005 62 13 0.0087 2005 62 28 0.0000

2005 61 30 0.0001 2005 62 14 0.0115 2005 62 29 0.0000

2005 62 0 0.1668 2005 62 15 0.0062 2005 62 30 0.0000

2005 62 1 0.1331 2005 62 16 0.0013

2005 62 2 0.1140 2005 62 17 0.0011

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 159
Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page 21

ROAD TYPE DISTRIBUTION 

The ODOT and WV Division of Highway county summary Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) data 

categorized by federal functional class for the three county non-attainment areas is the basis for Road 

Type Distribution Fraction. Table 10 illustrates Road Type Distribution.

Table 10

ROAD TYPE DISTRIBUTION FOR BROOKE-HANCOCK-JEFFERSON

NON-ATTAINMENT AREA

source

TypeID

road

TypeID roadDesc roadTypeVMTFraction

source

TypeID

road

TypeID roadDesc roadTypeVMTFraction

11 1 Off-Network 0 43 4 Urban Restricted Access 0.25

11 2 Rural Restricted Access 0.11 43 5 Urban Unrestricted Access 0.26

11 3 Rural Unrestricted Access 0.38 51 1 Off-Network 0

11 4 Urban Restricted Access 0.25 51 2 Rural Restricted Access 0.11

11 5 Urban Unrestricted Access 0.26 51 3 Rural Unrestricted Access 0.38

21 1 Off-Network 0 51 4 Urban Restricted Access 0.25

21 2 Rural Restricted Access 0.11 51 5 Urban Unrestricted Access 0.26

21 3 Rural Unrestricted Access 0.38 52 1 Off-Network 0

21 4 Urban Restricted Access 0.25 52 2 Rural Restricted Access 0.11

21 5 Urban Unrestricted Access 0.26 52 3 Rural Unrestricted Access 0.38

31 1 Off-Network 0 52 4 Urban Restricted Access 0.25

31 2 Rural Restricted Access 0.11 52 5 Urban Unrestricted Access 0.26

31 3 Rural Unrestricted Access 0.38 53 1 Off-Network 0

31 4 Urban Restricted Access 0.25 53 2 Rural Restricted Access 0.11

31 5 Urban Unrestricted Access 0.26 53 3 Rural Unrestricted Access 0.38

32 1 Off-Network 0 53 4 Urban Restricted Access 0.25

32 2 Rural Restricted Access 0.11 53 5 Urban Unrestricted Access 0.26

32 3 Rural Unrestricted Access 0.38 54 1 Off-Network 0

32 4 Urban Restricted Access 0.25 54 2 Rural Restricted Access 0.11

32 5 Urban Unrestricted Access 0.26 54 3 Rural Unrestricted Access 0.38

41 1 Off-Network 0 54 4 Urban Restricted Access 0.25

41 2 Rural Restricted Access 0.11 54 5 Urban Unrestricted Access 0.26

41 3 Rural Unrestricted Access 0.38 61 1 Off-Network 0

41 4 Urban Restricted Access 0.25 61 2 Rural Restricted Access 0.11

41 5 Urban Unrestricted Access 0.26 61 3 Rural Unrestricted Access 0.38

42 1 Off-Network 0 61 4 Urban Restricted Access 0.25

42 2 Rural Restricted Access 0.11 61 5 Urban Unrestricted Access 0.26

42 3 Rural Unrestricted Access 0.38 62 1 Off-Network 0

42 4 Urban Restricted Access 0.25 62 2 Rural Restricted Access 0.11

42 5 Urban Unrestricted Access 0.26 62 3 Rural Unrestricted Access 0.38

43 1 Off-Network 0 62 4 Urban Restricted Access 0.25

43 2 Rural Restricted Access 0.11 62 5 Urban Unrestricted Access 0.26

43 3 Rural Unrestricted Access 0.38

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 160
Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page 22

POST PROCESSING

Several custom programs created by ODOT were computed the total emissions. The process uses data 

on daily and directional traffic distributions as well as more up to date volume/delay functions from the 

2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). This process, described below and illustrated in Figure 4, also 

uses rewritten code able to handle the newer model network formats and MOVES generated emission 

factors. 

The first step in the process involves running postcms.exe to calculate hourly link volumes based on the 

percentage of the daily volume (travel demand model output) determined by a link’s facility and area 

type. The analysis does not use the link speeds from the travel demand model. Using a link’s volumeto-capacity ratio and link group code, a post-process to the model based on HCM methods estimates the 

link speeds. 

The second step (mmoves.exe) uses a combination of the MOVES emission factors and the hourly link 

volumes that are output of the postcms.exe program. The hourly volumes multiplied by the MOVES 

emission factor for the corresponding hour of day, speed bin, and road type; calculate emissions for 

every network link for each hour. The final link on road vehicle emissions for the area is the sum of all 

individual link-hour emissions. 

The third step, (vehcalm.exe), calculates vehicle-based emissions for each source type for each hour of 

the day. A combination of local and default data is the source for the vehicle source type. The final 

vehicle emissions for each county are the sum of all individual hourly emissions for all vehicle types. 

Since the intrazonal trips are not loaded onto the network, the fourth step in the process requires a 

separate method to account for those trips that use local roads to travel within a zone. The intracalm.exe 

program uses intrazonal trips to estimate VMT using the area in square miles and intrazonal trips of each 

zone. The computer program assumes that the zone is circular and uses the radius of the circle as the 

average trip length for these intrazonal trips. By combining MOVES generated emissions with 

estimated intrazonal VMT, the intrazonal emissions are then calculated. The emission rates are the same 

as those used to calculated link based emissions. 

The final step is to summarize link, vehicle, and intrazonal emissions for each county, pollutant, and 

analyzed year, and to multiply annual average daily emissions by 365 to produce an annual estimate. 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 161
APPENDIX A

INTERAGENCY CONSULTATION DOCUMENTATION

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 162
Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 163
Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 164
Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 165
Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 166
Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 167
Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 168
Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 169
Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 170
Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 171
Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 172
Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 173
Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 174
Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 175
Appendix D

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 176
This page left intentionally blank

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 177
1

Regional Air Quality Analyses for Ozone, PM2.5, and Regional Haze: 

Final Technical Support Document (Supplement), September 12, 2008

The purpose of this paper is to summarize a new modeling analysis performed by the Lake 

Michigan Air Directors Consortium (LADCO) to address the effect of the recent court decision 

vacating EPA’s Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR). This new modeling is intended to supplement 

the LADCO Technical Support Document (“Regional Air Quality Analyses for Ozone, PM2.5, 

and Regional Haze: Final Technical Support Document”, April 25, 2008), which summarizes the 

air quality analyses conducted by LADCO and its contractors to support the development of 

State Implementation Plans for ozone, PM2.5, and regional haze in the States of Illinois, 

Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin.

Compared to the previous LADCO modeling (Round 5.1), the new modeling shows similar 

results for ozone, but much more nonattainment for PM2.5 and higher visibility levels for 

regional haze. Specifically, the new modeling shows:

Ozone: Attainment of the 0.08 ppm standard by 2009 everywhere in the region, except 

Holland, MI, and nonattainment of the 0.075 ppm standard through at least 2018.

PM2.5: Widespread nonattainment of annual (15 ug/m3) and daily (35 ug/m3) standards.

Haze: Higher visibility levels on the 20% worst visibility days in 2018 in Class I areas in 

the eastern U.S., resulting in most areas being above the glide path.

Background: On July 11, 2008, the U.S. Court of Appeals for D.C. Circuit vacated EPA’s CAIR 

rule (cite). The reductions in NOx and SO2 emissions associated with this rule were a key part 

of the LADCO States’ attainment demonstrations for ozone and PM2.5 and the reasonable 

progress determinations for regional haze. LADCO’s previous modeling (Round 5.1) relied on 

EGU emission projections from EPA’s IPM3.0 analysis, which assumed implementation of 

Phases I and II of CAIR. For this new modeling, alternative EGU emission projections were 

developed, which did not rely on CAIR (or IPM).

Model Set-Up: The new modeling was performed consistent with LADCO’s previous modeling 

(Round 5.1):

Model Version: CAMx v4.50beta_deposition

Future Years: 2009, 2012, 2018

Runs: (a) Ozone: Summer 2005 meteorology with 12 km grids

(b) PM2.5 and haze: Full year 2005 meteorology with 36 km grids

Emission Scenarios: The new modeling assumed the same set of “on the books” controls as 

in LADCO’s previous modeling (Round 5.1) for all sectors, except EGUs. In light of the CAIR 

decision, three new EGU scenarios were prepared:

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 178
2

Scenario A: 2007 CEM-based emissions were projected for all states in the modeling domain 

based on EIA growth rates by state (NERC region) and fuel type. The assumed growth rates for 

the Midwest States were: MAIN (IL, IA, MO, WI): 8.8% (2007-2018); ECAR (IN, KY, MI, OH): 

13.5% (2007-2018); and MAPP (MN): 15.1% (2007-2018). No control was applied. The annual 

emissions were temporalized based on profiles derived from 2004-2006 CEM data. (Note, these 

are the same temporal profiles used in Round 5.1.)

Scenario B. Scenario A emissions for the LADCO States and select neighboring states (e.g., 

MN, IA, MO, KY, TN, and WV) were adjusted by applying legally enforceable controls (i.e., 

emission reductions required by a Consent Decree, state rule, or permit). Only those legally 

enforceable controls identified (and justified) by the States were applied. The States also 

supplied the appropriate control factors. A table summarizing the Scenario B controls is provided 

in Appendix I.

Scenario C. For the years 2009 and 2012, Scenario A emissions for all states were adjusted by 

applying all planned SO2 and NOx controls based on the July 10 CAMD list (i.e., 90% reduction 

for scrubbers, 95% reduction for SCRs). Because the July 10 CAMD list only includes controls 

generally out to 2011, additional SO2 and NOx controls for the year 2018 were assumed for all 

BART-eligible EGUs in the five LADCO State plus MN, IA, MO, KY, TN, and MO list (i.e., 90% 

reduction for scrubbers, 95% reduction for SCRs).

1

 All Scenario B controls were included in 

Scenario C. A table summarizing the Scenario C controls is provided in Appendix II.

Table 1 and Figure 1 provide a summary of the 5-state regional NOx and SO2 emissions for 

each scenario and future year. (Note, the CAIR emissions included here are based on EPA’s 

IPM3.0 modeling.) Several comments on the emissions should be noted:

Summer NOx

• There is llittle difference between the three alternative scenarios and CAIR. This 

suggests that summer ozone concentrations for the alternative scenarios are 

likely to be similar to those predicted with CAIR (i.e., Round 5.1).

Annual NOx:

• There is a significant change in emissions between scenarios, mostly during the 

non-summer months.

• Scenario B reflects application of NOx controls in several states (e.g., IL,OH,WI).

• Because there are relatively few SCRs (in the LADCO States) on the CAMD list, 

Scenario C results in only a small emissions decrease compared to Scenario B.

• Assumed BART controls result in a significant emissions decrease.

Annual SO2

• There is a significant change in emissions between scenarios.

• Scenario B reflects application of SO2 controls in several states (e.g., IL,OH,WI).

• Because there are several FGDs (in the LADCO States) on the CAMD list, 

Scenario C results in a large emissions decrease compared to Scenario B.

• Assumed BART controls result in a significant emissions decrease (i.e., even 

lower emissions than the IPM-estimated CAIR emissions).

 

1

 A subsequent analysis was conducted with the following inventory changes: (a) 95% reduction for 

scrubbers, 90% redcuction for SCRs (consistent with EPA’s default assumptions for IPM), and (b)

revisions provided for a few plants in Indiana and Minnesota. The changes resulted in a relatively small 

difference in the regioinal NOx and SO2 emissions (e.g., about a 2% NOx increase and about a 1-2% 

decrease in SO2). To assess the impact of the changes, PM2.5 modleing was conducted with the new 

Scenario B and Scenario C emissions for 2012. The modeling showed little change in the predicted 

PM2.5 concentrations.

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 179
3

Figure 1. Regional NOx and SO2 Emissions

Summer NOx Emissions

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

20052007

2009A

2009B2009C

2009CAIR

2012A

2012B2012C

2012CAIR

2018A

2018B2018C

2018BART

2018CAIR

Annual NOx Emissions

0

200,000

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

20052007

2009A

2009B2009C

2009CAIR

2012A

2012B2012C

2012CAIR

2018A

2018B2018C

2018BART

2018CAIR

Annual SO2 Emissions

0

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

3,000,000

20052007

2009A

2009B2009C

2009CAIR

2012A

2012B2012C

2012CAIR

2018A

2018B2018C

2018BART

2018CAIR

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 180
4

Table 1. Regional NOx and SO2 Emissions

Summer NOx Emissions (TPD)

2005 2007 2009 A 2009 B 2009 C

2010 

CAIR 2012 A 2012 B 2012 C

2012 

CAIR 2018 A 2018 B 2018 C

2018 CBART2018 

CAIR

IL 305 305 311 311 311 275 340 236 236 266 333 227 227 219 224

IN 393 393 376 376 374 384 393 393 390 368 410 386 383 292 264

MI 393 393 350 350 350 242 366 366 366 229 377 377 377 260 243

OH 408 408 395 355 335 285 423 351 351 290 431 366 366 230 290

WI 413 413 167 160 160 238 184 170 170 177 183 168 168 168 177

1,912 1,912 1,599 1,552 1,530 1,424 1,706 1,516 1,513 1,330 1,734 1,524 1,521 1,169 1,198

Annual NOx Emissions (TPY)

2005 2007 2009 A 2009 B 2009 C

2010 

CAIR 2012 A 2012 B 2012 C

2012 

CAIR 2018 A 2018 B 2018 C

2018 CBART2018 

CAIR

IL 126,786 121,006 124,917 124,917 124,917 83,224 137,438 81,989 81,989 82,248 135,983 79,771 79,771 63,590 69,958

IN 214,727 203,493 203,776 203,776 201,947 133,188 212,790 212,790 210,877 125,541 221,950 212,805 210,810 177,027 90,415

MI 120,332 112,484 112,478 112,478 112,478 83,117 117,621 117,621 117,621 77,897 122,447 122,447 122,447 89,444 79,543

OH 255,554 240,351 240,016 173,071 164,911 94,346 251,065 172,514 172,514 97,679 261,644 179,737 179,737 125,762 95,678

WI 71,414 54,582 56,540 54,065 54,065 53,032 62,266 57,759 57,759 56,480 61,812 56,952 56,952 56,952 56,158

788,812 731,917 737,727 668,307 658,317 446,908 781,179 642,673 640,760 439,845 803,837 651,712 649,717 512,774 391,752

Annual SO2 Emissions (TPY)

2005 2007 2009 A 2009 B 2009 C

2010 

CAIR 2012 A 2012 B 2012 C

2012 

CAIR 2018 A 2018 B 2018 C

2018 CBART2018 

CAIR

IL 326,598 273,467 281,028 281,028 281,028 295,516 309,209 196,238 194,746 267,110 305,364 106,638 105,152 82,351 275,716

IN 866,964 722,301 721,252 721,252 619,486 374,335 754,323 754,323 558,567 379,144 786,551 764,065 559,945 426,695 359,915

MI 350,694 343,487 343,140 343,140 315,326 227,296 358,879 358,879 301,062 233,204 373,964 373,964 313,677 178,680 242,853

OH 1,100,510 960,820 959,466 959,466 693,438 427,145 1,003,633 897,099 572,807 370,532 1,045,945 819,770 481,623 333,740 315,560

WI 181,426 137,562 142,007 142,007 133,738 139,181 156,659 144,818 133,592 139,203 155,818 144,027 132,849 77,214 127,073

2,826,192 2,437,638 2,446,892 2,446,892 2,043,017 1,463,473 2,582,703 2,351,356 1,760,775 1,389,192 2,667,641 2,208,463 1,593,245 1,098,679 1,321,116

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 181
5

Modeling Results: Several tables summarizing the modeling results are provided:

Table 2 - future year ozone and PM2.5 concentrations for key monitors in the 

 LADCO region

Table 3 - number of monitoring sites greater than the National Ambient Air Quality 

 Standards (NNAQS)

Table 4 – visibility levels for Class I areas in the eastern U.S. 

Note, given that Scenario B and BART controls were only applied in an 11-state Midwest 

region, the validity of the results for other Class I areas in the eastern U.S. may be 

questionable. The Scenario C controls, on the other hand, cover all states and are, thus, 

likely valid in other Class I areas.

Spatial plots of the future year ozone and PM2.5 concentrations are provided in Figures 2 – 4. 

Based on these results, the following key findings should be noted:

Ozone 

• There is little change from the previous LADCO modeling (Round 5.1 with CAIR)

• The modeling shows attainment of the 0.08 ppm (85 ppb) standard by 2009, 

except Holland. (Note, Holland does meet this standard by 2012.)

• The modeling shows nonattainment of the 0.075 ppm (75 ppb) standard through 

2018.

PM2.5 - Annual

• There is a significant change from the previous LADCO modeling (Round 5.1 

with CAIR)

• The modeling shows extensive nonattainment of the annual standard.

PM2.5 - Daily 

• There is a significant change from the previous LADCO modeling (Round 5.1 

with CAIR)

• The modeling shows extensive nonattainment of the daily standard.

Haze 

• There is a significant change from the previous LADCO modeling (Round 5.1 

with CAIR)

• The modeling shows higher visibility levels in 2018 for the 20% worst visibility 

days (average about 0.5 deciviews for the northern Class I areas). The resulting 

visibility levels in the northern Class I areas (except Voyageurs) are above the 

glide path.

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 182
2005

Round 5 

with CAIR

Round 5 

with CAIR

Round 5 

with CAIR

Site Site ID Base Year Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen.C-BART

Lake Michigan Area

Chiwaukee 550590019 84.7 82.2 82.2 82.0 82.3 81.1 80.8 80.6 80.9 77.2 77.2 77.0 76.0 76.2

Racine 551010017 80.3 77.8 77.8 77.5 77.5 76.6 76.2 76.1 76.1 72.9 72.3 72.1 71.1 71.2

Milwaukee-Bayside 550890085 82.7 79.9 79.9 79.7 79.8 78.5 78.0 78.0 78.0 74.3 73.6 73.4 72.4 72.7

Harrington Beach 550890009 83.3 80.1 80.1 79.9 80.1 78.6 78.1 78.0 78.3 73.9 73.2 73.1 72.2 72.5

Manitowoc 550710007 85.0 80.8 80.8 80.7 80.8 79.0 78.5 78.4 78.6 73.9 73.2 73.1 72.0 72.5

Sheboygan 551170006 88.0 84.1 84.0 83.9 84.0 82.2 81.7 81.5 81.8 76.9 76.0 75.9 74.8 75.4

Kewaunee 550610002 82.7 78.2 78.2 78.0 78.1 76.4 75.9 75.7 75.9 71.3 70.7 70.5 69.4 69.9

Door County 550290004 88.7 84.1 84.1 83.9 83.9 82.0 81.4 81.3 81.5 76.5 75.6 75.5 74.2 74.7

Hammond 180892008 77.7 76.2 76.2 76.0 75.4 75.6 75.3 75.2 74.6 73.2 72.7 72.6 71.7 71.6

Whiting 180890030 79.3 77.8 77.8 77.7 77.0 77.2 76.9 76.8 76.2 74.8 74.3 74.2 73.2 73.1

Michigan City 180910005 77.0 74.5 74.5 74.3 73.9 73.3 72.9 72.8 72.5 69.7 69.2 69.1 68.1 68.1

Ogden Dunes 181270020 78.3 76.3 76.3 76.2 75.6 75.5 75.1 75.0 74.5 72.9 72.3 72.1 71.2 70.8

Holland 260050003 90.0 85.7 85.7 85.5 85.3 83.5 83.1 82.9 82.8 78.2 77.5 77.3 76.0 76.1

Jenison 261390005 82.0 76.8 76.8 76.7 76.0 75.1 74.6 74.5 74.5 70.2 69.6 69.5 67.9 68.7

Muskegon 261210039 85.0 80.6 80.6 80.5 80.5 78.6 78.2 78.1 78.0 73.5 72.8 72.8 71.5 71.9

Indianapolis Area

Noblesville 189571001 82.7 78.3 78.3 78.1 78.1 76.1 75.9 75.7 75.6 70.2 69.9 69.8 68.9 68.7

Fortville 180590003 78.0 74.1 74.1 73.9 73.9 71.9 71.8 71.7 71.4 66.7 66.5 66.3 65.4 65.1

Fort B. Harrison 180970050 78.7 75.4 75.3 75.2 75.1 73.8 73.6 73.6 73.2 70.6 70.3 70.2 69.3 69.1

Detroit Area

New Haven 260990009 86.0 82.4 82.3 82.1 81.4 81.4 81.2 81.1 80.2 78.1 77.8 77.7 76.5 76.1

Warren 260991003 84.0 82.4 82.3 82.2 81.3 82.1 81.8 81.7 80.7 79.7 79.4 79.3 78.0 77.6

Port Huron 261470005 82.7 78.2 78.2 78.1 77.5 76.5 76.3 76.2 75.5 72.6 72.5 72.3 70.9 70.9

Cleveland Area

Ashtabula 390071001 89.0 84.2 84.1 83.9 83.4 82.0 81.8 81.6 81.0 76.8 76.5 76.4 74.8 75.1

Geauga 390550004 79.3 75.8 75.8 75.6 74.7 74.0 73.8 73.7 72.7 69.5 69.2 69.1 67.6 67.3

Eastlake 390850003 86.3 83.1 83.1 82.9 81.9 81.8 81.6 81.5 80.5 78.2 78.0 77.8 76.5 76.2

Akron 391530020 83.7 79.1 79.1 79.0 78.1 76.9 76.7 76.6 75.6 70.9 70.6 70.4 68.7 68.7

Cincinnati Area

Wilmington 390271002 82.3 77.3 77.4 77.1 77.5 75.3 75.2 74.8 74.9 70.1 69.9 69.5 67.1 68.3

Sycamore 390610006 84.7 81.5 81.4 81.1 81.9 80.4 80.2 79.8 80.3 76.4 76.0 75.7 73.5 74.6

Lebanon 391650007 87.7 82.8 82.8 82.4 83.0 80.8 80.7 80.3 80.7 75.4 75.1 74.8 72.6 74.2

Columbus Area

London 390970007 79.7 75.0 75.0 74.8 75.0 73.0 72.8 72.7 72.6 68.1 67.8 67.6 65.9 66.3

New Albany 390490029 86.3 82.1 82.1 81.9 81.8 80.2 80.0 79.9 79.6 74.7 74.3 74.2 73.3 73.0

Franklin 290490028 80.3 76.7 76.6 76.5 75.9 75.1 74.9 74.8 74.1 70.5 70.2 70.1 70.2 69.0

St. Louis Area

W. Alton (MO) 291831002 86.3 81.1 81.2 81.1 81.0 80.0 79.9 79.9 78.6 76.9 76.8 76.7 74.2 74.9

Orchard (MO) 291831004 87.0 82.1 82.1 82.0 82.0 80.9 80.8 80.7 80.0 77.7 77.6 77.4 75.2 76.2

Sunset Hills (MO) 291890004 82.3 79.2 79.2 79.1 78.7 78.3 78.1 78.1 77.1 75.3 75.2 75.1 73.0 73.9

Arnold (MO) 290990012 82.3 77.8 77.8 77.7 77.2 76.7 76.6 76.5 75.6 73.6 73.4 73.4 71.3 72.0

Margaretta (MO) 295100086 83.0 79.8 79.8 79.7 79.3 78.8 78.7 78.6 77.9 75.7 75.6 75.5 73.7 74.4

Maryland Heights (MO) 291890014 87.3 85.4 85.4 85.3 84.0 84.3 84.1 84.0 81.7 81.1 80.9 80.8 78.4 78.1

Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 without CAIR

Table 2a. Ozone Modeling Results

2009 2012 2018

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 183
2005

Round 5 

with CAIR

Round 5 

with CAIR

Round 5 

with CAIR

Site Site ID Base Year Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen.C-BART

Illinois

Chicago - Washington HS 170310022 15.2 14.9 14.8 14.5 14.1 14.8 14.7 14.2 14.0 15.0 14.6 14.2 13.7 13.9

Chicago - Mayfair 170310052 15.8 15.1 15.1 14.8 14.4 15.1 14.9 14.5 14.2 15.1 14.7 14.3 13.7 13.9

Chicago - Springfield 170310057 15.0 14.6 14.6 14.3 13.9 14.6 14.4 14.0 13.8 14.8 14.4 14.0 13.4 13.7

Chicago - Lawndale 170310076 14.9 14.5 14.5 14.2 13.8 14.5 14.3 13.9 13.7 14.7 14.3 13.9 13.3 13.6

Blue Island 170312001 14.8 14.4 14.4 14.0 13.7 14.4 14.2 13.8 13.6 14.5 14.1 13.7 13.2 13.4

Summit 170313301 15.2 14.9 14.9 14.6 14.2 14.9 14.7 14.3 14.0 15.0 14.6 14.3 13.7 13.9

Cicero 170316005 15.5 15.1 15.1 14.8 14.4 15.1 14.9 14.5 14.3 15.2 14.9 14.4 13.9 14.2

Granite City 171191007 16.7 16.3 16.2 15.9 15.1 16.1 16.0 15.3 14.9 15.9 15.6 14.9 14.2 14.3

E. St. Louis 171630010 15.6 15.2 15.2 14.8 14.1 15.0 14.9 14.3 13.9 14.9 14.6 14.0 13.3 13.4

Indiana

Jeffersonville 180190005 16.4 15.8 15.7 14.8 13.8 15.8 15.6 14.5 13.7 16.0 15.5 14.3 13.7 13.4

Jasper 180372001 15.2 14.3 14.2 13.4 12.4 14.2 14.0 13.0 12.2 14.3 13.9 12.8 12.1 11.8

Gary 180890031 15.6 13.9 13.9 13.5 13.0 13.8 13.6 13.1 12.8 13.7 13.4 12.9 12.3 12.4

Indy-Washington Park 180970078 15.3 14.4 14.4 13.6 12.8 14.3 14.2 13.2 12.6 14.3 13.9 12.9 12.2 12.0

Indy-W 18th Street 180970081 16.0 15.1 15.1 14.3 15.0 14.9 13.9 15.0 14.6 13.5 12.8

Indy- Michigan Street 180970083 15.9 15.0 15.0 14.2 13.4 14.9 14.8 13.8 13.1 14.9 14.5 13.5 12.8 12.6

Michigan

Allen Park 261630001 14.5 11.0 14.0 13.5 13.0 14.0 13.8 13.2 12.8 13.9 13.6 13.0 12.4 12.4

Southwest HS 261630015 15.9 15.3 15.3 14.8 14.2 15.2 15.0 14.4 13.9 15.1 14.8 14.1 13.5 13.5

Linwood 261630016 14.6 14.1 14.1 13.6 13.1 14.0 13.9 13.3 12.8 13.9 13.6 13.0 12.5 12.5

Dearborn 261630033 17.5 17.0 17.0 16.4 15.8 16.9 16.7 16.0 15.5 16.8 16.4 15.7 15.1 15.1

Wyandotte 261630036 14.7 14.2 14.1 13.6 13.1 14.1 13.9 13.3 12.8 14.0 13.7 13.0 12.4 12.5

Ohio

Middletown - Bonita 390170003 16.2 15.3 15.2 14.3 13.5 15.2 15.0 13.9 13.2 15.2 14.8 13.7 13.0 12.8

Fairfield 390170016 15.8 15.1 15.0 14.1 13.1 15.1 14.9 13.7 12.9 15.2 14.7 13.5 12.8 12.5

Cleveland-28th Street 390350027 15.4 14.9 14.9 14.3 13.5 14.7 14.5 13.9 13.2 14.6 14.2 13.5 12.8 12.7

Cleveland-St. Tikhon 390350038 17.4 16.7 16.7 16.0 15.2 16.5 16.3 15.6 14.8 16.3 16.0 15.2 14.4 14.3

Cleveland-Broadway 390350045 16.5 15.9 15.8 15.2 14.4 15.6 15.5 14.8 14.0 15.5 15.1 14.4 13.6 13.5

Cleveland-GT Craig 390350060 17.1 16.5 16.4 15.8 15.0 16.3 16.1 15.4 14.6 16.1 15.7 15.0 14.2 14.1

Newburg Hts - Harvard Ave 390350065 16.0 15.4 15.3 14.7 14.0 15.2 15.0 14.3 13.6 15.1 14.7 14.0 13.2 13.1

Columbus - Fairgrounds 390490024 15.3 14.6 14.5 13.7 12.9 14.4 14.1 13.2 12.6 14.2 13.8 12.8 12.2 12.0

Columbus - Ann Street 390490025 15.1 14.4 14.3 13.5 12.7 14.2 13.9 13.1 12.4 14.1 13.6 12.6 12.0 11.9

Cincinnati - Seymour 390610014 17.3 16.6 16.5 15.5 14.5 16.5 16.3 15.1 14.3 16.6 16.2 14.9 14.2 13.8

Cincinnati - Taft Ave 390610040 15.5 14.8 14.7 13.8 12.8 14.8 14.6 13.4 12.6 14.9 14.5 13.2 12.5 12.2

Cincinnati - 8th Ave 390610042 16.9 12.0 16.1 15.0 14.0 16.1 15.9 14.7 13.8 16.2 15.7 14.4 13.7 13.4

Sharonville 390610043 15.6 14.9 14.8 13.9 12.9 14.9 14.7 13.5 12.7 14.9 14.5 13.3 12.6 12.3

Norwood 390617001 16.2 15.5 15.4 14.4 13.4 15.4 15.2 14.0 13.2 15.5 15.1 13.8 13.1 12.8

St. Bernard 390618001 17.6 16.8 16.7 15.7 14.7 16.7 16.5 15.3 14.4 16.8 16.4 15.1 14.3 14.0

Steubenville 390810016 15.8 14.5 14.4 13.5 12.8 14.3 14.2 13.1 12.5 14.8 14.5 13.3 12.9 12.7

Mingo Junction 390811001 16.5 15.2 15.2 14.3 13.5 15.0 14.9 13.8 13.2 15.6 15.2 14.0 13.6 13.4

Ironton 390870010 15.2 14.8 14.6 13.6 12.8 14.6 14.4 13.2 12.5 14.8 14.1 12.8 12.4 12.3

Dayton 391130032 15.5 14.9 14.8 14.0 13.2 14.8 14.6 13.6 12.9 14.8 14.3 13.3 12.6 12.4

New Boston 391450013 14.7 12.0 14.0 13.0 12.1 14.1 13.8 12.5 11.9 14.2 13.6 12.2 11.7 11.6

Canton - Dueber 391510017 16.3 15.7 15.6 14.8 14.0 15.5 15.3 14.4 13.6 15.4 14.9 14.0 13.3 13.3

Canton - Market 391510020 14.6 11.0 14.1 13.3 12.6 13.9 13.7 12.9 12.3 13.9 13.5 12.6 12.0 11.9

Akron - Brittain 391530017 15.1 14.6 14.5 13.8 13.0 14.4 14.2 13.4 12.7 14.3 13.8 13.0 12.3 12.3

Akron - W. Exchange 391530023 14.3 13.7 13.7 13.0 12.3 13.6 13.3 12.6 12.0 13.4 13.0 12.2 11.6 11.5

Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 without CAIR

2009 2012 2018

Table 2b. PM2.5 Modeling Results (Annual)

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 184
2005

Round 5 

with CAIR

Round 5 

with CAIR

Round 5 

with CAIR

Key Site County Site ID Base Year Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. C - BART

Illinois

Chicago - Washington HS Cook 170310022 36.6 36 36 36 36 36 36 37 36 37 36 37 37 35

Chicago - Mayfair Cook 170310052 40.3 37 37 37 36 37 36 37 36 38 37 37 37 36

Chicago - Springfield Cook 170310057 37.4 34 34 33 32 35 34 33 32 36 34 33 33 31

Chicago - Lawndale Cook 170310076 38.1 35 35 35 35 36 35 36 35 36 35 36 36 34

McCook Cook 170311016 43.0 39 39 39 39 40 39 40 39 40 40 41 40 38

Blue Island Cook 170312001 37.7 35 35 35 34 36 35 36 34 36 35 36 36 33

Schiller Park Cook 170313103 41.6 40 40 40 39 40 40 40 39 41 40 40 39 39

Summit Cook 170313301 40.2 38 38 39 38 39 38 39 38 39 38 39 39 37

Maywood Cook 170316005 39.2 38 38 38 38 38 38 39 38 39 38 39 39 37

Granite City Madison 171191007 39.2 36 36 35 33 36 35 34 33 36 35 35 33 32

E. St. Louis St. Clair 171630010 33.7 31 31 30 28 31 30 29 28 31 30 30 29 28

Indiana

Jeffersonville Clark 180190005 38.4 35 33 31 29 35 34 32 31 37 35 34 33 31

Jasper Dubois 180372001 36.2 32 32 30 28 32 32 30 29 33 31 31 30 28

Gary - IITRI Lake 180890022 39.0 35 35 35 34 35 34 35 34 36 36 36 35 35

Gary - Burr School Lake 180890026 39.0 34 34 34 33 34 34 35 34 34 34 34 34 32

Gary Lake 180890031 35.2 29 28 26 24 28 28 24 24 29 28 27 27 27

Indy-West Street Marion 180970043 38.0 34 34 33 33 35 35 34 33 36 35 34 34 33

Indy-English Avenue Marion 180970066 38.0 34 34 32 32 35 34 33 32 35 34 33 33 32

Indy-Washington Park Marion 180970078 36.6 33 33 32 31 33 33 32 31 34 33 32 32 32

Indy-W 18th Street Marion 180970081 38.3 33 33 31 31 33 33 32 31 34 33 32 32 31

Indy- Michigan Street Marion 180970083 36.0 32 32 29 28 32 31 29 28 32 31 29 29 29

Michigan

Luna Pier Monroe 261150005 38.9 34 34 32 32 34 34 32 32 34 33 32 31 31

Oak Park Oakland 261250001 39.9 38 38 37 36 38 37 37 36 38 37 37 36 35

Port Huron St. Clair 261470005 39.6 36 35 35 34 35 35 35 34 35 35 34 33 33

Ypsilanti Washtenaw 261610008 39.5 37 37 36 35 37 36 36 35 37 36 36 35 34

Allen Park Wayne 261630001 38.6 36 36 36 35 36 35 35 34 36 35 35 34 33

Southwest HS Wayne 261630015 40.1 36 36 36 35 36 35 35 35 36 35 35 34 33

Linwood Wayne 261630016 43.0 40 40 40 39 40 40 40 39 40 39 39 39 38

E 7 Mile Wayne 261630019 41.0 39 39 39 38 39 39 39 38 39 38 38 38 37

Dearborn Wayne 261630033 43.9 41 41 41 40 41 41 41 40 41 40 40 40 39

Wyandotte Wayne 261630036 37.2 36 36 36 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 34

Newberry Wayne 261630038 42.7 39 39 39 38 39 38 38 37 39 38 38 37 36

FIA Wayne 261630039 39.7 35 34 34 33 35 34 34 33 35 34 33 33 31

Ohio

Middleton Butler 390170003 39.3 33 32 29 28 33 33 29 28 34 32 29 28 27

Fairfield Butler 390170016 37.1 32 31 29 27 31 30 28 28 32 30 29 28 27

Butler 390170017 40.8 33 32 30 29 33 33 30 29 33 32 30 29 28

Cleveland-28th Street Cuyahoga 390350027 36.9 34 34 33 32 34 33 33 32 34 33 33 31 31

Cleveland-St. Tikhon Cuyahoga 390350038 44.2 40 40 37 36 40 39 36 35 40 38 36 35 34

Cleveland-Broadway Cuyahoga 390350045 38.8 35 35 33 31 35 34 32 30 35 34 31 29 29

Cleveland-GT Craig Cuyahoga 390350060 42.1 39 39 38 37 39 38 38 37 39 38 37 36 35

Newburg Hts - Harvard Ave Cuyahoga 390350065 38.9 35 35 33 31 35 34 32 30 36 35 32 31 30

Columbus - Fairgrounds Franklin 390490024 38.5 34 34 33 33 34 33 32 32 34 34 33 32 31

Columbus - Ann Street Franklin 390490025 38.5 34 33 31 31 33 33 31 31 34 33 31 31 30

Cincinnait Hamilton 390610006 40.6 33 33 30 27 33 32 29 28 34 32 29 28 27

Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 without CAIR

2009 2012 2018

Table 2c. PM2.5 Modeling Results (Daily)

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 185
2005

Round 5 

with CAIR

Round 5 

with CAIR

Round 5 

with CAIR

Key Site County Site ID Base Year Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. C - BART

Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 without CAIR

2009 2012 2018

Table 2c. PM2.5 Modeling Results (Daily)

Cincinnati - Seymour Hamilton 390610014 38.4 33 33 28 26 33 32 27 25 33 31 29 25 24

Cincinnati - Taft Ave Hamilton 390610040 36.7 31 30 26 24 31 30 26 24 32 29 26 24 23

Cincinnati - 8th Ave Hamilton 390610042 37.3 32 32 30 28 32 31 29 28 33 31 29 28 27

Sharonville Hamilton 390610043 36.0 32 31 30 28 32 31 29 28 32 31 29 28 27

Norwood Hamilton 390617001 38.8 34 33 32 30 33 33 31 30 34 33 31 30 29

St. Bernard Hamilton 390618001 40.6 35 35 32 30 35 34 31 30 35 33 32 31 29

Steubenville Jefferson 390810016 40.7 36 35 32 29 35 34 30 28 37 35 31 29 28

Mingo Junction Jefferson 390811001 42.0 37 37 33 30 37 36 32 30 38 36 32 30 30

Dayton Montgomery391130032 37.8 34 33 31 30 33 33 31 30 34 33 31 31 30

Canton - Dueber Stark 391510017 38.6 33 32 30 28 33 31 30 28 33 30 29 28 27

Akron - Brittain Summit 391530017 38.1 33 33 31 30 33 32 31 30 33 32 30 29 29

Wisconsin

Green Bay - Est High Brown 550090005 37.1 35 34 35 35 34 35 35 34 33 33 33 32 32

Madison Dane 550250047 36.4 33 33 32 32 33 32 32 31 32 31 30 29 29

Milwaukee-Health Center Milwaukee 550790010 38.7 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 34 35 34 34 34 33

Milwaukee-SER Hdqs Milwaukee 550790026 37.4 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 33

Milwaukee-Virginia FS Milwaukee 550790043 39.9 37 37 37 36 37 36 37 36 36 36 37 36 36

Milwaukee- Fire Dept Hdqs Milwaukee 550790099 37.8 34 34 33 33 34 33 33 32 34 33 33 33 32

Waukesha Waukesha 551330027 35.5 32 32 32 31 32 32 32 31 32 31 31 30 29

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 186
10

Table 3. Modeling Results: Number of Sites > NAAQS

Ozone (85 ppb) Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 w/ CAIR

2009 Baseyear Scen. A Scen. B Scen. C Scen. C-BART

IL 0 0 0 0 ---- 0

IN 0 0 0 0 ---- 0

MI 3 1 1 1 ---- 1

OH 4 0 0 0 ---- 0

WI 2 0 0 0 ---- 0

Total 9 1 1 1 1

2012

IL 0 0 0 0 ---- 0

IN 0 0 0 0 ---- 0

MI 3 0 0 0 ---- 0

OH 4 0 0 0 ---- 0

WI 2 0 0 0 ---- 0

Total 9 0 0 0 0

2018

IL 0 0 0 0 0 0

IN 0 0 0 0 0 0

MI 3 0 0 0 0 0

OH 4 0 0 0 0 0

WI 2 0 0 0 0 0

Total 9 0 0 0 0 0

Ozone (75 ppb) Round 5 without CAIR Round5 w/ CAIR

2009 Baseyear Scen. A Scen. B Scen. C Scen. C-BART

IL 12 6 6 6 ---- 4

IN 26 10 9 8 ---- 5

MI 21 12 12 12 ---- 12

OH 45 27 25 24 ---- 21

WI 12 10 10 10 ---- 10

Total 116 65 62 60 ---- 52

2012

IL 12 3 3 3 ---- 1

IN 26 5 4 4 ---- 3

MI 21 9 8 8 ---- 6

OH 45 18 14 12 ---- 11

WI 12 10 9 9 ---- 9

Total 116 45 38 36 30

2018

IL 12 0 0 0 0 0

IN 26 0 0 0 0 0

MI 21 3 3 3 3 3

OH 45 3 3 2 1 1

WI 12 3 2 1 1 1

Total 116 9 8 6 5 5

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 187
11

PM2.5 - Annual Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 w/ CAIR

2009 Baseyear Scen. A Scen. B Scen. C Scen. C-BART

IL 7 4 4 1 ---- 1

IN 6 2 2 0 ---- 0

MI 2 2 2 1 ---- 1

OH 26 13 12 5 ---- 1

WI 0 0 0 0 ---- 0

Total 41 21 20 7 3

2012

IL 7 3 1 1 ---- 0

IN 6 1 1 0 ---- 0

MI 2 2 1 1 ---- 1

OH 26 12 9 4 ---- 0

WI 0 0 0 0 ---- 0

Total 41 18 12 6 1

2018

IL 7 3 1 0 0 0

IN 6 1 1 0 0 0

MI 2 2 1 1 1 1

OH 26 13 8 2 0 0

WI 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 41 19 11 3 1 1

PM2.5 - Daily

Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 w/ CAIR

2009 Baseyear Scen. A Scen. B Scen. C Scen. C-BART

IL 16 7 7 6 ---- 6

IN 13 0 0 0 ---- 0

MI 14 10 9 9 ---- 5

OH 31 4 3 2 ---- 2

WI 8 1 1 1 ---- 1

Total 82 22 20 18 ---- 14

2012

IL 16 9 6 8 ---- 6

IN 13 0 0 0 ---- 0

MI 14 8 6 6 ---- 5

OH 31 3 3 2 ---- 1

WI 8 1 1 1 ---- 1

Total 82 21 16 17 13

2018

IL 16 10 6 8 8 5

IN 13 4 1 1 0 0

MI 14 8 6 6 5 4

OH 31 5 3 2 1 0

WI 8 1 1 1 1 1

Total 82 28 17 18 15 10

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 188
12

Table 4. Modeling Results: Future Year Visibility Levels

Worst 20% 2018

Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 w/ CAIR

Site

Baseline

(2000-2004) 2018 URP Scen. A Scen. B Scen. C

Scen. CBART 

BOWA1 19.86 17.94 19.09 18.87 18.54 18.02 17.94

VOYA2 19.48 17.75 18.60 18.44 18.17 17.77 17.63

SENE1 24.38 21.64 24.02 23.58 23.03 22.38 22.59

ISLE1 21.59 19.43 21.05 20.86 20.62 20.22 20.09

ISLE9 21.59 19.43 20.83 20.58 20.38 19.84 19.84

HEGL1 26.75 23.13 26.24 25.83 24.87 24.23 24.22

MING1 28.15 24.27 27.51 26.98 25.81 24.93 24.74

CACR1 26.36 22.91 25.32 24.80 23.57 22.97 22.44

UPBU1 26.27 22.82 25.31 24.79 23.50 22.79 22.59

MACA1 31.37 26.64 30.11 29.08 27.06 26.24 26.10

DOSO1 29.05 24.69 27.88 26.96 24.36 23.74 23.00

SHEN1 29.31 25.12 28.38 27.65 25.24 24.69 23.92

JARI1 29.12 24.91 28.06 27.21 25.00 24.48 24.06

BRIG1 29.01 25.05 28.10 28.07 26.57 26.25 25.21

LYBR1 24.45 21.48 24.06 23.86 22.58 22.30 21.14

ACAD1 22.89 20.45 22.88 22.76 22.31 22.16 21.49

Best 20% 2018

Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 w/ CAIR

Site

Baseline

(2000-2004) 2018 Max Scen. A Scen. B Scen. C

Scen. CBART

BOWA1 6.42 6.42 6.20 6.17 6.16 6.12 6.14

VOYA2 7.09 7.09 6.87 6.83 6.81 6.78 6.75

SENE1 7.14 7.14 7.80 7.78 7.81 7.77 7.71

ISLE1 6.75 6.75 6.77 6.76 6.72 6.67 6.60

ISLE9 6.75 6.75 6.63 6.61 6.58 6.53 6.52

HEGL1 12.84 12.84 12.17 12.20 12.07 11.63 11.66

MING1 14.46 14.46 13.78 13.77 13.70 13.37 13.28

CACR1 11.24 11.24 10.94 10.99 10.97 10.78 10.52

UPBU1 11.71 11.71 11.18 11.23 11.18 10.96 10.73

MACA1 16.51 16.51 16.32 16.21 15.76 15.34 15.25

DOSO1 12.28 12.28 12.02 11.84 11.27 11.03 11.00

SHEN1 10.93 10.93 10.98 10.91 10.25 10.16 9.91

JARI1 14.21 14.21 14.19 13.98 13.42 13.21 13.14

BRIG1 14.33 14.33 14.32 14.46 14.22 14.17 13.92

LYBR1 6.37 6.37 6.39 6.38 6.31 6.28 6.14

ACAD1 8.78 8.78 8.97 8.96 8.90 8.89 8.82

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 189
13

Figure 2. Ozone Modeling Results

2009 Round 5 – Scen. A Round 5 – Scen. B Round 5 – Scen. C Round 5 - CAIR

2012 Round 5 – Scen. A Round 5 – Scen. B Round 5 – Scen. C Round 5 - CAIR

2018 Round 5 – Scen. A Round 5 – Scen. B Round 5 – Scen. C Round 5 - CAIR

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 190
14

Figure 3. PM2.5 Annual Modeling Results

2009 Round 5 – Scen. A Round 5 – Scen. B Round 5 – Scen. C Round 5 - CAIR

2012 Round 5 – Scen. A Round 5 – Scen. B Round 5 – Scen. C Round 5 - CAIR

2018 Round 5 – Scen. A Round 5 – Scen. B Round 5 – Scen. C Round 5 - CAIR

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 191
15

Figure 4. PM2.5 Daily Modeling Results

2009 Round 5 – Scen. A Round 5 – Scen. B Round 5 – Scen. C Round 5 - CAIR

2012 Round 5 – Scen. A Round 5 – Scen. B Round 5 – Scen. C Round 5 - CAIR

2018 Round 5 – Scen. A Round 5 – Scen. B Round 5 – Scen. C Round 5 - CAIR

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 192
Appendix I

Scenario B (Legally Enforceable) Controls

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 193
NOx – 2009

Point Source Grown and Controlled Emissions by facility for NOX r6s1b_2009 Base Year = 2002

Future Year = 2009

STID=17 CYID=57 fcid=057801AAA name=AES DUCK CREEK

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 57 057801AAA 0001 0001 01 10100202 NOX 0.8147 0.8416 0.8416 0.00 0.00 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

STID=17 CYID=143 fcid=143805AAG name=AES ED EDWARDS STATION

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 143 143805AAG 0001 0001 01 10100202 NOX 3.0515 3.1522 3.1522 0.00 0.00 lnb LNB added by LADCO 

 17 143 143805AAG 0001 0003 01 10100202 NOX 6.9419 7.1708 7.1708 0.00 0.00 lnb LNB added by LADCO 

 17 143 143805AAG 0002 0004 01 10100202 NOX 2.1310 2.2013 2.2013 0.00 0.00 lnb LNB added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 12.1244 12.5243 12.5243 

cyid 12.1244 12.5243 12.5243 

stid 12.9392 13.3659 13.3659 

STID=39 CYID=1 fcid=0701000007 name="DP&L, J.M. STUART GENERATING STATION"

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 39 1 0701000007 R1 B001 B001P1 10100202 NOX 6.9860 6.9756 2.3252 0.85 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 1 0701000007 R2 B002 B002P1 10100202 NOX 3.6327 3.6273 1.2091 0.85 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 1 0701000007 R3 B003 B003P1 10100202 NOX 5.0133 5.0058 1.6686 0.85 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 1 0701000007 R4 B004 B004P1 10100202 NOX 7.8493 7.8376 2.6125 0.85 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 23.4814 23.4464 7.8155 

cyid 23.4814 23.4464 7.8155 

STID=39 CYID=167 fcid=0684000000 name=MUSKINGUM RIVER POWER PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 39 167 0684000000 R1 B001 B001P1 10200501 NOX 0.0017 0.0017 0.0001 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R2 B002 B002P1 10100201 NOX 5.8167 5.8080 0.2904 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R2 B002 B002P2 10100501 NOX 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R3 B003 B003P1 10100201 NOX 7.9017 7.8899 0.3945 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R3 B003 B003P2 10100501 NOX 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R4 B004 B004P1 10100203 NOX 7.8775 7.8657 0.3933 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R4 B004 B004P2 10100501 NOX 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R6 B006 B006P1 10100202 NOX 3.8586 3.8528 0.1926 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R6 B006 B006P2 10100501 NOX 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 25.4561 25.4182 1.2709 

cyid 25.4561 25.4182 1.2709 

stid 48.9375 48.8646 9.0864 

STID=55 CYID=79 fcid=241007800 name=WIS ELECTRIC POWER VALLEY STATION

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 194
STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 55 79 241007800 S11 B21 01 10100202 NOX 2.7972 2.8895 1.6470 0.00 0.43 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 79 241007800 S11 B22 01 10100202 NOX 2.9073 3.0032 1.7118 0.00 0.43 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 79 241007800 S12 B23 01 10100202 NOX 2.3270 2.4038 1.2740 0.00 0.47 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 79 241007800 S12 B24 01 10100202 NOX 2.3427 2.4199 1.2826 0.00 0.47 SCR Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 10.3742 10.7164 5.9154 

cyid 10.3742 10.7164 5.9154 

STID=55 CYID=117 fcid=460033090 name=WP & L Alliant Energy - Edgewater Gen Station

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 55 117 460033090 S11 B23 01 10100203 NOX 1.6197 1.6731 1.0038 0.00 0.40 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 117 460033090 S11 B24 01 10100203 NOX 4.1072 4.2426 3.4789 0.00 0.18 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 117 460033090 S12 B25 01 10100221 NOX 5.6804 5.8677 4.9876 0.00 0.15 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 11.4072 11.7834 9.4703 

cyid 11.4072 11.7834 9.4703 

stid 21.7814 22.4997 15.3857 

 ======== ======== ==========

 83.6581 84.7302 37.8380 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 195
NOx - 2012

Point Source Grown and Controlled Emissions by facility for NOX r6s1b_2012 Base Year = 2002

Future Year = 2012

STID=17 CYID=33 fcid=033801AAA name=AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING CO

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 33 033801AAA 0005 0005 01 10100202 NOX 1.642 1.871 0.9357 0.00 0.500 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 17 33 033801AAA 0006 0006 01 10100202 NOX 2.116 2.413 1.2063 0.00 0.500 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 3.758 4.284 2.1420 

cyid 3.758 4.284 2.1420 

STID=17 CYID=57 fcid=057801AAA name=AES DUCK CREEK

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 57 057801AAA 0001 0001 01 10100202 NOX 0.815 0.929 0.9288 0.00 0.000 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

STID=17 CYID=79 fcid=079808AAA name=AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING CO

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 79 079808AAA 0003 0003 01 10100202 NOX 6.735 7.678 7.6780 0.00 0.000 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 17 79 079808AAA 0012 0013 01 10100501 NOX 5.936 5.378 5.3781 0.00 0.000 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 12.671 13.056 13.0561 

cyid 12.671 13.056 13.0561 

STID=17 CYID=97 fcid=097190AAC name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 97 097190AAC 0016 0031 02 10100401 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO 

STID=17 CYID=137 fcid=137805AAA name=AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING CO

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 137 137805AAA 0003 0003 01 10100202 NOX 5.356 6.106 6.1058 0.00 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCO 

STID=17 CYID=143 fcid=143805AAG name=AES ED EDWARDS STATION

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 143 143805AAG 0001 0001 01 10100202 NOX 3.052 3.479 3.4789 0.00 0.000 lnb LNB added by LADCO 

 17 143 143805AAG 0001 0003 01 10100202 NOX 6.942 7.914 7.9141 0.00 0.000 lnb LNB added by LADCO 

 17 143 143805AAG 0002 0004 01 10100202 NOX 2.131 2.429 2.4294 0.00 0.000 lnb LNB added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 12.124 13.822 13.8224 

cyid 12.124 13.822 13.8224 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 196
STID=17 CYID=167 fcid=167120AAO name=CITY WATER LIGHT & POWER

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 167 167120AAO 0010 0012 01 10100203 NOX 6.527 7.441 0.0074 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SHUTDOWN added by LADCO

 17 167 167120AAO 0010 0013 01 10100203 NOX 2.646 3.017 0.0030 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SHUTDOWN added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 9.173 10.458 0.0105 

cyid 9.173 10.458 0.0105 

STID=17 CYID=179 fcid=179801AAA name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 179 179801AAA 0018 0029 01 10100203 NOX 22.429 25.570 1.2785 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 17 179 179801AAA 0018 0031 01 10100203 NOX 38.993 44.454 2.2227 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 61.422 70.024 3.5012 

cyid 61.422 70.024 3.5012 

STID=17 CYID=197 fcid=197809AAO name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 197 197809AAO 0032 0033 02 10100604 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.800 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

STID=17 CYID=197 fcid=197810AAK name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 197 197810AAK 0011 0016 02 10100222 NOX 5.731 6.534 3.9203 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 17 197 197810AAK 0011 0016 03 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 17 197 197810AAK 0013 0010 02 10100223 NOX 8.598 9.802 0.0098 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO 

 17 197 197810AAK 0013 0010 03 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO 

 17 197 197810AAK 0007 0012 02 10100223 NOX 10.974 12.511 0.0125 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO 

 17 197 197810AAK 0007 0012 03 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 25.303 28.847 3.9426 

cyid 25.303 28.847 3.9426 

stid 130.622 147.527 43.5096 

STID=27 CYID=61 fcid=2706100004 name=Minnesota Power Inc - Boswell Energy Ctr

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 27 61 2706100004 SV003 EU003 001 10100226 NOX 13.661 14.142 2.8284 0.00 0.800 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 27 61 2706100004 SV003 EU003 002 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.800 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 13.661 14.142 2.8284 

cyid 13.661 14.142 2.8284 

STID=27 CYID=109 fcid=2710900011 name=Rochester Public Utilities - Silver Lake

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 197
 27 109 2710900011 SV003 EU004 001 10100202 NOX 2.079 2.152 1.2911 0.00 0.400 SNCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

stid 15.739 16.294 4.1195 

STID=39 CYID=1 fcid=0701000007 name="DP&L, J.M. STUART GENERATING STATION"

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 39 1 0701000007 R1 B001 B001P1 10100202 NOX 6.986 7.296 2.4319 0.85 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 1 0701000007 R2 B002 B002P1 10100202 NOX 3.633 3.794 1.2646 0.85 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 1 0701000007 R3 B003 B003P1 10100202 NOX 5.013 5.235 1.7452 0.85 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 1 0701000007 R4 B004 B004P1 10100202 NOX 7.849 8.197 2.7324 0.85 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 23.481 24.522 8.1740 

cyid 23.481 24.522 8.1740 

STID=39 CYID=31 fcid=0616000000 name=CONESVILLE POWER PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 39 31 0616000000 R4 B004 B004P1 10100212 NOX 20.852 21.776 1.0888 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

STID=39 CYID=167 fcid=0684000000 name=MUSKINGUM RIVER POWER PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 39 167 0684000000 R1 B001 B001P1 10200501 NOX 0.002 0.002 0.0001 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R2 B002 B002P1 10100201 NOX 5.817 6.074 0.3037 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R2 B002 B002P2 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R3 B003 B003P1 10100201 NOX 7.902 8.252 0.4126 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R3 B003 B003P2 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R4 B004 B004P1 10100203 NOX 7.877 8.227 0.4113 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R4 B004 B004P2 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R6 B006 B006P1 10100202 NOX 3.859 4.030 0.2015 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R6 B006 B006P2 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 25.456 26.584 1.3292 

cyid 25.456 26.584 1.3292 

stid 69.789 72.882 10.5920 

STID=55 CYID=79 fcid=241007690 name=WIS ELECTRIC POWER OAK CREEK STATION

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 55 79 241007690 S13 B25 01 10100202 NOX 4.755 5.421 3.0898 0.00 0.430 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 79 241007690 S13 B26 01 10100202 NOX 3.277 3.736 2.2045 0.00 0.410 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 79 241007690 S14 B27 01 10100212 NOX 3.333 3.800 2.8499 0.00 0.250 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 79 241007690 S14 B28 01 10100212 NOX 3.384 3.857 2.9316 0.00 0.240 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 14.749 16.814 11.0757 

STID=55 CYID=79 fcid=241007800 name=WIS ELECTRIC POWER VALLEY STATION

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 198
 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 55 79 241007800 S11 B21 01 10100202 NOX 2.797 3.189 1.8177 0.00 0.430 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 79 241007800 S11 B22 01 10100202 NOX 2.907 3.314 1.8893 0.00 0.430 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 79 241007800 S12 B23 01 10100202 NOX 2.327 2.653 1.4061 0.00 0.470 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 79 241007800 S12 B24 01 10100202 NOX 2.343 2.671 1.4155 0.00 0.470 SCR Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 10.374 11.827 6.5285 

cyid 25.123 28.641 17.6042 

STID=55 CYID=117 fcid=460033090 name=WP & L Alliant Energy - Edgewater Gen Station

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 55 117 460033090 S11 B23 01 10100203 NOX 1.620 1.846 1.1079 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 117 460033090 S11 B24 01 10100203 NOX 4.107 4.682 3.8395 0.00 0.180 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 117 460033090 S12 B25 01 10100221 NOX 5.680 6.476 5.5045 0.00 0.150 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 11.407 13.005 10.4519 

cyid 11.407 13.005 10.4519 

stid 36.530 41.646 28.0562 

 ======== ======== ==========

 252.681 278.349 86.2773 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 199
NOx 2018

Point Source Grown and Controlled Emissions by facility for NOX r6s1b_2018 Base Year = 2002

Future Year = 2018

STID=17 CYID=31 fcid=031600AIN name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 31 031600AIN 0010 0013 01 10100226 NOX 2.283 2.592 1.5550 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 17 31 031600AIN 0010 0013 02 10100601 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 17 31 031600AIN 0012 0016 01 10100226 NOX 3.991 4.531 2.7184 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 17 31 031600AIN 0012 0016 02 10100601 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 6.274 7.122 4.2734 

cyid 6.274 7.122 4.2734 

STID=17 CYID=33 fcid=033801AAA name=AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING CO

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 33 033801AAA 0005 0005 01 10100202 NOX 1.642 1.863 0.9317 0.00 0.500 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 17 33 033801AAA 0006 0006 01 10100202 NOX 2.116 2.402 1.2012 0.00 0.500 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 3.758 4.266 2.1329 

cyid 3.758 4.266 2.1329 

STID=17 CYID=57 fcid=057801AAA name=AES DUCK CREEK

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 57 057801AAA 0001 0001 01 10100202 NOX 0.815 0.925 0.9249 0.00 0.000 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

STID=17 CYID=79 fcid=079808AAA name=AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING CO

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 79 079808AAA 0003 0003 01 10100202 NOX 6.735 7.645 7.6453 0.00 0.000 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 17 79 079808AAA 0012 0013 01 10100501 NOX 5.936 3.984 3.9838 0.00 0.000 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 12.671 11.629 11.6291 

cyid 12.671 11.629 11.6291 

STID=17 CYID=97 fcid=097190AAC name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 97 097190AAC 0016 0031 02 10100401 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO 

STID=17 CYID=137 fcid=137805AAA name=AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING CO

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 137 137805AAA 0003 0003 01 10100202 NOX 5.356 6.080 6.0798 0.00 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCO 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 200
STID=17 CYID=143 fcid=143805AAG name=AES ED EDWARDS STATION

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 143 143805AAG 0001 0001 01 10100202 NOX 3.052 3.464 3.4641 0.00 0.000 lnb LNB added by LADCO 

 17 143 143805AAG 0001 0003 01 10100202 NOX 6.942 7.880 7.8804 0.00 0.000 lnb LNB added by LADCO 

 17 143 143805AAG 0002 0004 01 10100202 NOX 2.131 2.419 2.4191 0.00 0.000 lnb LNB added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 12.124 13.764 13.7636 

cyid 12.124 13.764 13.7636 

STID=17 CYID=167 fcid=167120AAO name=CITY WATER LIGHT & POWER

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 167 167120AAO 0010 0012 01 10100203 NOX 6.527 7.410 0.0074 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SHUTDOWN added by LADCO

 17 167 167120AAO 0010 0013 01 10100203 NOX 2.646 3.004 0.0030 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SHUTDOWN added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 9.173 10.414 0.0104 

cyid 9.173 10.414 0.0104 

STID=17 CYID=179 fcid=179801AAA name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 179 179801AAA 0018 0029 01 10100203 NOX 22.429 25.462 1.2731 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 17 179 179801AAA 0018 0031 01 10100203 NOX 38.993 44.265 2.2132 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 61.422 69.726 3.4863 

cyid 61.422 69.726 3.4863 

STID=17 CYID=197 fcid=197809AAO name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 197 197809AAO 0032 0033 02 10100604 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.800 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

STID=17 CYID=197 fcid=197810AAK name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 197 197810AAK 0011 0016 02 10100222 NOX 5.731 6.506 3.9036 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 17 197 197810AAK 0011 0016 03 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 17 197 197810AAK 0013 0010 02 10100223 NOX 8.598 9.760 0.0098 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO 

 17 197 197810AAK 0013 0010 03 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO 

 17 197 197810AAK 0007 0012 02 10100223 NOX 10.974 12.458 0.0125 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO 

 17 197 197810AAK 0007 0012 03 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 25.303 28.724 3.9258 

cyid 25.303 28.724 3.9258 

stid 136.896 152.649 46.2263 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 201
STID=18 CYID=147 fcid=00020 name=INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER-ROCKPORT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 18 147 00020 1 001 01 10100222 NOX 23.226 25.291 1.2646 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 18 147 00020 1 001 02 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 23.226 25.291 1.2646 

cyid 23.226 25.291 1.2646 

stid 23.226 25.291 1.2646 

STID=27 CYID=61 fcid=2706100004 name=Minnesota Power Inc - Boswell Energy Ctr

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 27 61 2706100004 SV003 EU003 001 10100226 NOX 13.661 15.733 3.1466 0.00 0.800 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 27 61 2706100004 SV003 EU003 002 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.800 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 13.661 15.733 3.1466 

cyid 13.661 15.733 3.1466 

STID=27 CYID=109 fcid=2710900011 name=Rochester Public Utilities - Silver Lake

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 27 109 2710900011 SV003 EU004 001 10100202 NOX 2.079 2.394 1.4363 0.00 0.400 SNCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

stid 15.739 18.127 4.5830 

STID=39 CYID=1 fcid=0701000007 name="DP&L, J.M. STUART GENERATING STATION"

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 39 1 0701000007 R1 B001 B001P1 10100202 NOX 6.986 7.607 2.5358 0.85 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 1 0701000007 R2 B002 B002P1 10100202 NOX 3.633 3.956 1.3186 0.85 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 1 0701000007 R3 B003 B003P1 10100202 NOX 5.013 5.459 1.8197 0.85 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 1 0701000007 R4 B004 B004P1 10100202 NOX 7.849 8.547 2.8491 0.85 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 23.481 25.570 8.5232 

cyid 23.481 25.570 8.5232 

STID=39 CYID=31 fcid=0616000000 name=CONESVILLE POWER PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 39 31 0616000000 R4 B004 B004P1 10100212 NOX 20.852 22.706 1.1353 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

STID=39 CYID=167 fcid=0684000000 name=MUSKINGUM RIVER POWER PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 39 167 0684000000 R1 B001 B001P1 10200501 NOX 0.002 0.002 0.0001 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 202
 39 167 0684000000 R2 B002 B002P1 10100201 NOX 5.817 6.334 0.3167 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R2 B002 B002P2 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R3 B003 B003P1 10100201 NOX 7.902 8.604 0.4302 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R3 B003 B003P2 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R4 B004 B004P1 10100203 NOX 7.877 8.578 0.4289 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R4 B004 B004P2 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R6 B006 B006P1 10100202 NOX 3.859 4.202 0.2101 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R6 B006 B006P2 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 25.456 27.720 1.3860 

cyid 25.456 27.720 1.3860 

stid 69.789 75.996 11.0445 

STID=54 CYID=39 fcid=0006 name=APPALACHIAN POWER - KANAWHA RIVER PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 54 39 0006 012 001 99 10100202 NOX 4.829 5.258 2.6291 0.00 0.500 SCR Scrubber added by LADCO

 54 39 0006 012 002 99 10100202 NOX 4.921 5.359 2.6794 0.00 0.500 SCR Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 9.750 10.617 5.3085 

cyid 9.750 10.617 5.3085 

stid 9.750 10.617 5.3085 

STID=55 CYID=79 fcid=241007690 name=WIS ELECTRIC POWER OAK CREEK STATION

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 55 79 241007690 S13 B25 01 10100202 NOX 4.755 5.398 3.0766 0.00 0.430 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 79 241007690 S13 B26 01 10100202 NOX 3.277 3.720 2.1951 0.00 0.410 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 79 241007690 S14 B27 01 10100212 NOX 3.333 3.784 2.8378 0.00 0.250 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 79 241007690 S14 B28 01 10100212 NOX 3.384 3.841 2.9191 0.00 0.240 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 14.749 16.743 11.0285 

STID=55 CYID=79 fcid=241007800 name=WIS ELECTRIC POWER VALLEY STATION

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 55 79 241007800 S11 B21 01 10100202 NOX 2.797 3.175 1.4289 0.00 0.550 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 79 241007800 S11 B22 01 10100202 NOX 2.907 3.300 1.4852 0.00 0.550 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 79 241007800 S12 B23 01 10100202 NOX 2.327 2.642 1.1887 0.00 0.550 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 79 241007800 S12 B24 01 10100202 NOX 2.343 2.659 1.1967 0.00 0.550 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 10.374 11.777 5.2995 

cyid 25.123 28.519 16.3281 

STID=55 CYID=117 fcid=460033090 name=WP & L Alliant Energy - Edgewater Gen Station

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 55 117 460033090 S11 B23 01 10100203 NOX 1.620 1.839 1.1032 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 203
 55 117 460033090 S11 B24 01 10100203 NOX 4.107 4.662 3.8232 0.00 0.180 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 117 460033090 S12 B25 01 10100221 NOX 5.680 6.448 5.4811 0.00 0.150 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 11.407 12.949 10.4074 

cyid 11.407 12.949 10.4074 

stid 36.530 41.469 26.7355 

 ======== ======== ==========

 291.931 324.149 95.1624 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 204
SO2 – 2009

Point Source Grown and Controlled Emissions by facility for SO2 r6s1b_2009 1

Base Year = 2002

Future Year = 2009

STID=19 CYID=115 fcid=58-07-001 name=MIDAMERICAN ENERGY CO. - LOUISA STATION

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 19 115 58-07-001 117487 147281 99 10100222 SO2 33.664 34.774 3.4774 0.0 0.90 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=21 CYID=161 fcid=2116100009 name=EAST KY POWER COOP

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 21 161 2116100009 1 001 99 10100202 SO2 42.166 42.103 4.2103 0.0 0.90 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 21 161 2116100009 2 002 99 10100212 SO2 55.385 55.303 5.5303 0.0 0.90 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 97.551 97.406 9.7406 

cyid 97.551 97.406 9.7406 

stid 97.551 97.406 9.7406 

STID=27 CYID=141 fcid=2714100004 name=NSP - Sherburne Generating Plant

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 27 141 2714100004 SV001 EU001 001 10100222 SO2 16.765 16.987 3.6401 0.3 0.85 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 27 141 2714100004 SV001 EU002 001 10100222 SO2 22.549 22.848 4.8959 0.3 0.85 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 39.314 39.834 8.5360 

cyid 39.314 39.834 8.5360 

stid 39.314 39.834 8.5360 

STID=54 CYID=51 fcid=0005 name=OHIO POWER - MITCHELL PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 54 51 0005 012 001 99 10100202 SO2 17.775 17.748 1.7748 0.0 0.90 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 54 51 0005 012 002 99 10100202 SO2 5.689 5.680 0.5680 0.0 0.90 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 23.463 23.428 2.3428 

cyid 23.463 23.428 2.3428 

STID=54 CYID=53 fcid=0009 name=APPALACHIAN POWER - MOUNTAINEER PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 54 53 0009 001 001 99 10100202 SO2 11.196 11.179 1.1179 0.0 0.90 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=54 CYID=79 fcid=0006 name=APPALACHIAN POWER - JOHN E AMOS PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 205
 54 79 0006 012 001 99 10100202 SO2 79.635 79.516 7.9516 0.0 0.90 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 54 79 0006 003 003 99 10100202 SO2 139.377 139.169 13.9169 0.0 0.90 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 219.012 218.685 21.8685 

cyid 219.012 218.685 21.8685 

stid 253.671 253.293 25.3293 

 ======== ======== ==========

 424.200 425.307 47.0832 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 206
SO2 – 2012

Point Source Grown and Controlled Emissions by facility for SO2 r6s1b_2012 1

Base Year = 2002

Future Year = 2012

STID=17 CYID=31 fcid=031600AMI name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 31 031600AMI 0007 0010 01 10100226 SO2 16.13 18.39 1.839 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=17 CYID=97 fcid=097190AAC name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 97 097190AAC 0018 0033 01 10100226 SO2 24.14 27.52 2.752 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 97 097190AAC 0021 0036 01 10100226 SO2 19.23 21.92 2.192 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 97 097190AAC 0016 0031 01 10100203 SO2 4.59 5.24 0.005 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 47.96 54.68 4.950 

cyid 47.96 54.68 4.950 

STID=17 CYID=125 fcid=125804AAB name=DYNEGY MIDWEST GENERATION INC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 125 125804AAB 0019 0023 01 10100202 SO2 22.34 25.47 3.821 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=17 CYID=127 fcid=127855AAC name=ELECTRIC ENERGY INC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 127 127855AAC 0001 0001 01 10100222 SO2 11.83 13.48 13.482 0.0 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCO 

 17 127 127855AAC 0001 0002 01 10100222 SO2 11.48 13.09 13.085 0.0 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCO 

 17 127 127855AAC 0002 0003 01 10100222 SO2 10.25 11.68 11.680 0.0 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCO 

 17 127 127855AAC 0002 0004 01 10100222 SO2 12.04 13.73 13.731 0.0 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCO 

 17 127 127855AAC 0003 0006 01 10100222 SO2 12.68 14.46 14.456 0.0 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 58.27 66.43 66.435 

cyid 58.27 66.43 66.435 

STID=17 CYID=135 fcid=135803AAA name=AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING CO

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 135 135803AAA 0001 0001 01 10100203 SO2 32.99 37.61 3.761 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 135 135803AAA 0001 0003 01 10100203 SO2 72.92 83.13 8.313 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 105.91 120.74 12.074 

cyid 105.91 120.74 12.074 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 207
STID=17 CYID=157 fcid=157851AAA name=DYNEGY MIDWEST GENERATION INC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 157 157851AAA 0001 0001 01 10100203 SO2 25.14 28.66 4.299 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 157 157851AAA 0002 0002 01 10100203 SO2 25.79 29.41 4.411 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 157 157851AAA 0013 0013 01 10100202 SO2 27.79 31.68 4.752 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 78.72 89.75 13.462 

cyid 78.72 89.75 13.462 

STID=17 CYID=167 fcid=167120AAO name=CITY WATER LIGHT & POWER

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 167 167120AAO 0010 0012 01 10100203 SO2 44.20 50.39 0.050 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 167 167120AAO 0010 0013 01 10100203 SO2 16.40 18.70 0.019 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 60.61 69.10 0.069 

cyid 60.61 69.10 0.069 

STID=17 CYID=179 fcid=179801AAA name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 179 179801AAA 0018 0029 01 10100203 SO2 25.35 28.90 2.890 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 179 179801AAA 0018 0031 01 10100203 SO2 41.57 47.39 4.739 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 66.91 76.29 7.629 

cyid 66.91 76.29 7.629 

STID=17 CYID=197 fcid=197810AAK name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 197 197810AAK 0013 0010 03 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 197 197810AAK 0007 0012 02 10100223 SO2 15.33 17.48 0.017 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 197 197810AAK 0007 0012 03 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 15.33 17.48 0.017 

cyid 15.33 17.48 0.017 

stid 472.19 538.32 110.295 

STID=19 CYID=115 fcid=58-07-001 name=MIDAMERICAN ENERGY CO. - LOUISA STATION

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 19 115 58-07-001 117487 147281 99 10100222 SO2 33.66 38.38 3.838 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=21 CYID=161 fcid=2116100009 name=EAST KY POWER COOP

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 208
 21 161 2116100009 1 001 99 10100202 SO2 42.17 44.03 4.403 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 21 161 2116100009 2 002 99 10100212 SO2 55.39 57.84 5.784 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 97.55 101.87 10.187 

cyid 97.55 101.87 10.187 

stid 97.55 101.87 10.187 

STID=27 CYID=61 fcid=2706100004 name=Minnesota Power Inc - Boswell Energy Ctr

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 27 61 2706100004 SV003 EU003 001 10100226 SO2 33.99 35.19 15.081 0.3 0.700 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 27 61 2706100004 SV003 EU003 002 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.3 0.700 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 33.99 35.19 15.081 

cyid 33.99 35.19 15.081 

STID=27 CYID=109 fcid=2710900011 name=Rochester Public Utilities - Silver Lake

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 27 109 2710900011 SV003 EU004 001 10100202 SO2 7.86 8.13 1.220 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=27 CYID=141 fcid=2714100004 name=NSP - Sherburne Generating Plant

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 27 141 2714100004 SV001 EU001 001 10100222 SO2 16.76 17.36 3.719 0.3 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 27 141 2714100004 SV001 EU002 001 10100222 SO2 22.55 23.34 5.002 0.3 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 39.31 40.70 8.721 

cyid 39.31 40.70 8.721 

stid 81.16 84.02 25.023 

STID=39 CYID=13 fcid=0607130015 name=R. E. BURGER PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 39 13 0607130015 R6 B011 B011P1 10100202 SO2 29.83 31.15 3.115 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 39 13 0607130015 R7 B012 B012P1 10100202 SO2 34.77 36.31 3.631 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 64.60 67.46 6.746 

cyid 64.60 67.46 6.746 

STID=39 CYID=31 fcid=0616000000 name=CONESVILLE POWER PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 39 31 0616000000 R4 B004 B004P1 10100212 SO2 316.00 330.00 33.000 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

stid 380.60 397.46 39.746 

STID=47 CYID=1 fcid=0009 name=TVA BULL RUN FOSSIL PLANT

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 209
 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 47 1 0009 S-1 001 99 10100212 SO2 130.81 133.01 13.301 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=47 CYID=73 fcid=0007 name=TVA JOHN SEVIER FOSSIL PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 47 73 0007 S-1A 001 99 10100212 SO2 20.15 20.49 2.049 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 73 0007 S-1B 002 99 10100212 SO2 20.25 20.59 2.059 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 73 0007 S-2A 003 99 10100212 SO2 19.62 19.95 1.995 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 73 0007 S-2B 004 99 10100212 SO2 18.93 19.25 1.925 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 78.95 80.28 8.028 

cyid 78.95 80.28 8.028 

STID=47 CYID=85 fcid=0011 name=TVA JOHNSONVILLE FOSSIL PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 47 85 0011 S1-01 001 99 10100212 SO2 17.06 17.35 1.735 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 85 0011 S1-04 004 99 10100212 SO2 19.85 20.18 2.018 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 85 0011 S1-05 005 99 10100212 SO2 24.11 24.52 2.452 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 61.02 62.04 6.204 

cyid 61.02 62.04 6.204 

STID=47 CYID=145 fcid=0013 name=TVA KINGSTON FOSSIL PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 47 145 0013 S-1 001 99 10100202 SO2 12.68 12.89 1.289 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 145 0013 S-1 002 99 10100202 SO2 14.00 14.24 1.424 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 145 0013 S-1 003 99 10100202 SO2 13.80 14.04 1.404 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 145 0013 S-1 004 99 10100202 SO2 12.24 12.44 1.244 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 145 0013 S-1 005 99 10100202 SO2 19.57 19.90 1.990 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 145 0013 S-2 006 99 10100202 SO2 18.92 19.24 1.924 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 145 0013 S-2 007 99 10100202 SO2 21.30 21.66 2.166 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 145 0013 S-2 008 99 10100202 SO2 18.54 18.85 1.885 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 145 0013 S-2 009 99 10100202 SO2 20.72 21.07 2.107 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 151.77 154.33 15.433 

cyid 151.77 154.33 15.433 

STID=47 CYID=165 fcid=0025 name=TVA GALLATIN FOSSIL PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 47 165 0025 S-01 001 99 10100212 SO2 13.91 14.14 1.414 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 165 0025 S-01 002 99 10100212 SO2 14.87 15.12 1.512 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 165 0025 S-02 003 99 10100212 SO2 16.33 16.60 1.660 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 165 0025 S-02 004 99 10100212 SO2 20.39 20.73 2.073 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 210
fcid 65.49 66.59 6.659 

cyid 65.49 66.59 6.659 

stid 488.04 496.25 49.625 

STID=54 CYID=51 fcid=0005 name=OHIO POWER - MITCHELL PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 54 51 0005 012 001 99 10100202 SO2 17.77 18.56 1.856 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 54 51 0005 012 002 99 10100202 SO2 5.69 5.94 0.594 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 23.46 24.50 2.450 

cyid 23.46 24.50 2.450 

STID=54 CYID=53 fcid=0009 name=APPALACHIAN POWER - MOUNTAINEER PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 54 53 0009 001 001 99 10100202 SO2 11.20 11.69 1.169 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=54 CYID=79 fcid=0006 name=APPALACHIAN POWER - JOHN E AMOS PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 54 79 0006 012 001 99 10100202 SO2 79.63 83.16 8.316 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 54 79 0006 012 002 99 10100202 SO2 100.33 104.78 10.478 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 54 79 0006 003 003 99 10100202 SO2 139.38 145.55 14.555 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 319.35 333.50 33.350 

cyid 319.35 333.50 33.350 

stid 354.00 369.69 36.969 

STID=55 CYID=79 fcid=241007690 name=WIS ELECTRIC POWER OAK CREEK STATION

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 55 79 241007690 S13 B25 01 10100202 SO2 12.75 14.54 3.490 0.0 0.760 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 55 79 241007690 S13 B26 01 10100202 SO2 8.68 9.89 2.473 0.0 0.750 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 55 79 241007690 S14 B27 01 10100212 SO2 10.97 12.51 2.876 0.0 0.770 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 55 79 241007690 S14 B28 01 10100212 SO2 11.28 12.86 2.958 0.0 0.770 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 43.68 49.80 11.797 

cyid 43.68 49.80 11.797 

stid 43.68 49.80 11.797 

 ======== ======== ==========

 1950.90 2075.80 287.480 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 211
SO2 – 2018

Point Source Grown and Controlled Emissions by facility for SO2 r6s1b_2018 1

Base Year = 2002

Future Year = 2018

STID=17 CYID=31 fcid=031600AIN name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 31 031600AIN 0010 0013 01 10100226 SO2 10.92 12.39 1.239 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 31 031600AIN 0012 0016 01 10100226 SO2 17.69 20.08 2.008 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 28.61 32.48 3.248 

STID=17 CYID=31 fcid=031600AMI name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 31 031600AMI 0007 0010 01 10100226 SO2 16.13 18.31 1.831 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

cyid 44.74 50.79 5.079 

STID=17 CYID=79 fcid=079808AAA name=AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING CO

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 79 079808AAA 0003 0003 01 10100202 SO2 36.35 41.27 4.127 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 79 079808AAA 0012 0013 01 10100501 SO2 28.99 19.46 1.946 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 65.34 60.72 6.072 

cyid 65.34 60.72 6.072 

STID=17 CYID=97 fcid=097190AAC name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 97 097190AAC 0018 0033 01 10100226 SO2 24.14 27.40 2.740 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 97 097190AAC 0021 0036 01 10100226 SO2 19.23 21.83 2.183 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 97 097190AAC 0016 0031 01 10100203 SO2 4.59 5.22 0.005 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 47.96 54.45 4.928 

cyid 47.96 54.45 4.928 

STID=17 CYID=125 fcid=125804AAB name=DYNEGY MIDWEST GENERATION INC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 125 125804AAB 0019 0023 01 10100202 SO2 22.34 25.36 3.805 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=17 CYID=127 fcid=127855AAC name=ELECTRIC ENERGY INC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 212
 17 127 127855AAC 0002 0003 01 10100222 SO2 10.25 11.63 11.630 0.0 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCO 

 17 127 127855AAC 0002 0004 01 10100222 SO2 12.04 13.67 13.673 0.0 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCO 

 17 127 127855AAC 0001 0001 01 10100222 SO2 11.83 13.42 1.342 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 127 127855AAC 0001 0002 01 10100222 SO2 11.48 13.03 1.303 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 127 127855AAC 0003 0005 01 10100222 SO2 11.72 13.31 1.331 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 127 127855AAC 0003 0006 01 10100222 SO2 12.68 14.39 1.439 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 70.00 79.46 30.719 

cyid 70.00 79.46 30.719 

STID=17 CYID=135 fcid=135803AAA name=AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING CO

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 135 135803AAA 0001 0001 01 10100203 SO2 32.99 37.45 3.745 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 135 135803AAA 0001 0003 01 10100203 SO2 72.92 82.77 8.277 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 105.91 120.22 12.022 

cyid 105.91 120.22 12.022 

STID=17 CYID=143 fcid=143805AAG name=AES ED EDWARDS STATION

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 143 143805AAG 0002 0004 01 10100202 SO2 15.28 17.34 1.734 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=17 CYID=157 fcid=157851AAA name=DYNEGY MIDWEST GENERATION INC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 157 157851AAA 0001 0001 01 10100203 SO2 25.14 28.54 4.281 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 157 157851AAA 0002 0002 01 10100203 SO2 25.79 29.28 4.392 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 157 157851AAA 0013 0013 01 10100202 SO2 27.79 31.54 4.732 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 78.72 89.36 13.404 

cyid 78.72 89.36 13.404 

STID=17 CYID=167 fcid=167120AAO name=CITY WATER LIGHT & POWER

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 167 167120AAO 0010 0012 01 10100203 SO2 44.20 50.18 0.050 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 167 167120AAO 0010 0013 01 10100203 SO2 16.40 18.62 0.019 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 60.61 68.80 0.069 

cyid 60.61 68.80 0.069 

STID=17 CYID=179 fcid=179801AAA name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 179 179801AAA 0018 0029 01 10100203 SO2 25.35 28.77 2.877 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 179 179801AAA 0018 0031 01 10100203 SO2 41.57 47.19 4.719 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 213
fcid 66.91 75.96 7.596 

cyid 66.91 75.96 7.596 

STID=17 CYID=197 fcid=197809AAO name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 197 197809AAO 0006 0009 01 10100203 SO2 15.89 18.04 1.804 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 197 197809AAO 0016 0031 01 10100202 SO2 27.43 31.13 3.113 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 197 197809AAO 0017 0033 01 10100202 SO2 23.13 26.26 2.626 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 66.45 75.44 7.544 

STID=17 CYID=197 fcid=197810AAK name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 197 197810AAK 0009 0014 02 10100222 SO2 11.64 13.21 1.321 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 197 197810AAK 0011 0016 02 10100222 SO2 25.67 29.14 2.914 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 197 197810AAK 0013 0010 03 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 197 197810AAK 0007 0012 02 10100223 SO2 15.33 17.40 0.017 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 197 197810AAK 0007 0012 03 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 52.64 59.75 4.252 

cyid 119.09 135.19 11.796 

stid 696.90 777.66 97.225 

STID=18 CYID=147 fcid=00020 name=INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER-ROCKPORT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 18 147 00020 1 001 01 10100222 SO2 66.42 72.32 7.232 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 18 147 00020 1 001 02 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 66.42 72.32 7.232 

cyid 66.42 72.32 7.232 

stid 66.42 72.32 7.232 

STID=19 CYID=115 fcid=58-07-001 name=MIDAMERICAN ENERGY CO. - LOUISA STATION

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 19 115 58-07-001 117487 147281 99 10100222 SO2 33.66 38.22 3.822 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=21 CYID=127 fcid=2112700003 name=KENTUCKY POWER CO

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 21 127 2112700003 2 002 99 10100202 SO2 104.52 113.82 11.382 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=21 CYID=161 fcid=2116100009 name=EAST KY POWER COOP

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 214
 21 161 2116100009 1 001 99 10100202 SO2 42.17 45.92 4.592 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 21 161 2116100009 2 002 99 10100212 SO2 55.39 60.31 6.031 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 97.55 106.23 10.623 

cyid 97.55 106.23 10.623 

stid 202.07 220.04 22.004 

STID=27 CYID=61 fcid=2706100004 name=Minnesota Power Inc - Boswell Energy Ctr

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 27 61 2706100004 SV003 EU003 001 10100226 SO2 33.99 39.15 16.778 0.3 0.700 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 27 61 2706100004 SV003 EU003 002 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.3 0.700 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 33.99 39.15 16.778 

cyid 33.99 39.15 16.778 

STID=27 CYID=109 fcid=2710900011 name=Rochester Public Utilities - Silver Lake

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 27 109 2710900011 SV003 EU004 001 10100202 SO2 7.86 9.05 1.357 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=27 CYID=141 fcid=2714100004 name=NSP - Sherburne Generating Plant

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 27 141 2714100004 SV001 EU001 001 10100222 SO2 16.76 19.31 4.138 0.3 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 27 141 2714100004 SV001 EU002 001 10100222 SO2 22.55 25.97 5.565 0.3 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 39.31 45.28 9.703 

cyid 39.31 45.28 9.703 

stid 81.16 93.48 27.838 

STID=39 CYID=13 fcid=0607130015 name=R. E. BURGER PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 39 13 0607130015 R6 B011 B011P1 10100202 SO2 29.83 32.48 3.248 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 39 13 0607130015 R7 B012 B012P1 10100202 SO2 34.77 37.86 3.786 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 64.60 70.34 7.034 

cyid 64.60 70.34 7.034 

STID=39 CYID=31 fcid=0616000000 name=CONESVILLE POWER PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 39 31 0616000000 R4 B004 B004P1 10100212 SO2 316.00 344.11 34.411 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=39 CYID=167 fcid=0684000000 name=MUSKINGUM RIVER POWER PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 215
 39 167 0684000000 R2 B002 B002P1 10100201 SO2 65.07 70.85 7.085 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 39 167 0684000000 R2 B002 B002P2 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 39 167 0684000000 R3 B003 B003P1 10100201 SO2 94.58 103.00 10.300 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 39 167 0684000000 R3 B003 B003P2 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 39 167 0684000000 R4 B004 B004P1 10100203 SO2 81.64 88.90 8.890 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 39 167 0684000000 R4 B004 B004P2 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 39 167 0684000000 R5 B005 B005P1 10100203 SO2 97.22 105.87 10.587 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 39 167 0684000000 R5 B005 B005P2 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 39 167 0684000000 R6 B006 B006P1 10100202 SO2 113.96 124.10 12.410 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 39 167 0684000000 R6 B006 B006P2 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 452.48 492.72 49.272 

cyid 452.48 492.72 49.272 

stid 833.08 907.16 90.716 

STID=47 CYID=1 fcid=0009 name=TVA BULL RUN FOSSIL PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 47 1 0009 S-1 001 99 10100212 SO2 130.81 136.82 13.682 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=47 CYID=73 fcid=0007 name=TVA JOHN SEVIER FOSSIL PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 47 73 0007 S-1A 001 99 10100212 SO2 20.15 21.07 2.107 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 73 0007 S-1B 002 99 10100212 SO2 20.25 21.18 2.118 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 73 0007 S-2A 003 99 10100212 SO2 19.62 20.52 2.052 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 73 0007 S-2B 004 99 10100212 SO2 18.93 19.80 1.980 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 78.95 82.57 8.257 

cyid 78.95 82.57 8.257 

STID=47 CYID=85 fcid=0011 name=TVA JOHNSONVILLE FOSSIL PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 47 85 0011 S1-01 001 99 10100212 SO2 17.06 17.84 1.784 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 85 0011 S1-04 004 99 10100212 SO2 19.85 20.76 2.076 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 85 0011 S1-05 005 99 10100212 SO2 24.11 25.22 2.522 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 61.02 63.82 6.382 

cyid 61.02 63.82 6.382 

STID=47 CYID=145 fcid=0013 name=TVA KINGSTON FOSSIL PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 47 145 0013 S-1 001 99 10100202 SO2 12.68 13.26 1.326 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 145 0013 S-1 002 99 10100202 SO2 14.00 14.65 1.465 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 216
 47 145 0013 S-1 003 99 10100202 SO2 13.80 14.44 1.444 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 145 0013 S-1 004 99 10100202 SO2 12.24 12.80 1.280 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 145 0013 S-1 005 99 10100202 SO2 19.57 20.47 2.047 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 145 0013 S-2 006 99 10100202 SO2 18.92 19.79 1.979 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 145 0013 S-2 007 99 10100202 SO2 21.30 22.28 2.228 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 145 0013 S-2 008 99 10100202 SO2 18.54 19.39 1.939 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 145 0013 S-2 009 99 10100202 SO2 20.72 21.68 2.168 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 151.77 158.75 15.875 

cyid 151.77 158.75 15.875 

STID=47 CYID=165 fcid=0025 name=TVA GALLATIN FOSSIL PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 47 165 0025 S-01 001 99 10100212 SO2 13.91 14.54 1.454 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 165 0025 S-01 002 99 10100212 SO2 14.87 15.56 1.556 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 165 0025 S-02 003 99 10100212 SO2 16.33 17.08 1.708 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 165 0025 S-02 004 99 10100212 SO2 20.39 21.32 2.132 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 65.49 68.50 6.850 

cyid 65.49 68.50 6.850 

stid 488.04 510.46 51.046 

STID=54 CYID=39 fcid=0006 name=APPALACHIAN POWER - KANAWHA RIVER PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 54 39 0006 012 001 99 10100202 SO2 19.45 21.18 10.591 0.0 0.500 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 54 39 0006 012 002 99 10100202 SO2 20.94 22.80 11.399 0.0 0.500 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 40.39 43.98 21.990 

cyid 40.39 43.98 21.990 

STID=54 CYID=51 fcid=0005 name=OHIO POWER - MITCHELL PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 54 51 0005 012 001 99 10100202 SO2 17.77 19.36 1.936 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 54 51 0005 012 002 99 10100202 SO2 5.69 6.19 0.619 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 23.46 25.55 2.555 

STID=54 CYID=51 fcid=0006 name=OHIO POWER - KAMMER PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 54 51 0006 013 001 99 10100203 SO2 47.06 51.25 5.125 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 54 51 0006 013 002 99 10100203 SO2 47.66 51.90 5.190 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 54 51 0006 013 003 99 10100203 SO2 41.94 45.67 4.567 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 217
---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 136.67 148.82 14.882 

cyid 160.13 174.37 17.437 

STID=54 CYID=53 fcid=0001 name=APPALACHIAN POWER CO.-PHILIP SPORN PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 54 53 0001 014 001 99 10100202 SO2 18.65 20.31 2.031 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 54 53 0001 014 002 99 10100202 SO2 15.87 17.28 1.728 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 54 53 0001 014 003 99 10100202 SO2 21.46 23.36 2.336 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 54 53 0001 014 004 99 10100202 SO2 20.53 22.36 2.236 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 54 53 0001 005 005 99 10100202 SO2 46.82 50.98 5.098 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 123.33 134.30 13.430 

STID=54 CYID=53 fcid=0009 name=APPALACHIAN POWER - MOUNTAINEER PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 54 53 0009 001 001 99 10100202 SO2 11.20 12.19 1.219 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

cyid 134.53 146.49 14.649 

STID=54 CYID=79 fcid=0006 name=APPALACHIAN POWER - JOHN E AMOS PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 54 79 0006 012 001 99 10100202 SO2 79.63 86.72 8.672 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 54 79 0006 012 002 99 10100202 SO2 100.33 109.26 10.926 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 54 79 0006 003 003 99 10100202 SO2 139.38 151.77 15.177 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 319.35 347.75 34.775 

cyid 319.35 347.75 34.775 

stid 654.39 712.59 88.851 

STID=55 CYID=79 fcid=241007690 name=WIS ELECTRIC POWER OAK CREEK STATION

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 55 79 241007690 S13 B25 01 10100202 SO2 12.75 14.48 3.475 0.0 0.760 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 55 79 241007690 S13 B26 01 10100202 SO2 8.68 9.85 2.462 0.0 0.750 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 55 79 241007690 S14 B27 01 10100212 SO2 10.97 12.45 2.864 0.0 0.770 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 55 79 241007690 S14 B28 01 10100212 SO2 11.28 12.81 2.945 0.0 0.770 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 43.68 49.59 11.746 

cyid 43.68 49.59 11.746 

stid 43.68 49.59 11.746 

 ======== ======== ==========

 3099.41 3381.52 400.481 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 218
Appendix II

Scenario C Controls (CAMD List)

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 219
1

NOx Controls (SCRs, 2007 – 2013))

Plant Name UniqueID_Final State Name County

Capacity 

MW

On Line 

Year

SCR 

Online 

Year

Chesterfield 3797_B_4 Virginia Chesterfield 166 1960 2013

Chesterfield 3797_B_5 Virginia Chesterfield 310 1964 2012

Scherer 6257_B_3 Georgia Monroe 875 1987 2011

Chesterfield 3797_B_6 Virginia Chesterfield 658 1969 2011

Sandow No 4 6648_B_4 Texas Milam 545 1981 2011

Beech Hollow Power Project 82704_B_1 Pennsylvania Washington 272 2011 2011

Longview Power 82702_B_1 West Virginia Monongalia 695 2011 2011

Cliffside 2721_B_6 North Carolina Cleveland 800 2011 2011

AES Westover 2526_B_11 New York Broome 22 1943 2010

AES Westover 2526_B_12 New York Broome 22 1943 2010

AES Westover 2526_B_13 New York Broome 84 1951 2010

Iatan 2 6065_B_2 Missouri Platte 850 2010 2010

Southwest 6195_B_2 Missouri Greene 300 2010 2010

Trimble Station (LGE) 6071_B_2 Kentucky Trimble 732 2010 2010

Elm Road Generating Station 56068_B_2 Wisconsin Milwaukee 615 2010 2010

Clay Boswell 1893_B_3 Minnesota Itasca 350 1973 2009

Asheville 2706_B_2 North Carolina Buncombe 184 1971 2009

Conesville 2840_B_4 Ohio Coshocton 780 1973 2009

Marshall 2727_B_3 North Carolina Catawba 657 1969 2009

St Johns River Power Park 207_B_1 Florida Duval 626 1987 2009

Ghent 1356_B_2 Kentucky Carroll 469 1977 2009

Chalk Point LLC 1571_B_1 Maryland Prince George's 341 1964 2009

Chalk Point LLC 1571_B_2 Maryland Prince George's 342 1965 2009

San Juan 2451_B_2 New Mexico San Juan 320 1973 2009

Big Bend 645_B_BB01 Florida Hillsborough 411 1970 2009

Big Bend 645_B_BB02 Florida Hillsborough 391 1973 2009

Big Bend 645_B_BB03 Florida Hillsborough 414 1976 2009

Nebraska City Unit 2 6096_B_2 Nebraska Otoe 663 2009 2009

Cross 130_B_4 South Carolina Berkeley 652 2009 2009

Springerville 8223_B_4 Arizona Apache 400 2009 2009

Sandow 5 82010_B_5 Texas Milam 600 2009 2009

Oak Grove 82011_B_1 Texas Robertson 800 2009 2009

Oak Grove 82011_B_2 Texas Robertson 800 2009 2009

TS Power Plant 82013_B_1 Nevada Eureka 200 2009 2009

Plum Point Energy 82014_B_1 Arkansas Mississippi 665 2009 2009

Comanche 470_B_3 Colorado Pueblo 750 2009 2009

Elm Road Generating Station 56068_B_1 Wisconsin Milwaukee 615 2009 2009

Two Elk Generating Station 55360_B_1 Wyoming Campbell 300 2009 2009

J K Spruce 7097_B_BLR2 Texas Bexar 750 2009 2009

Dallman 963_B_34 Illinois Sangamon 200 2009 2009

AES Greenidge LLC 2527_B_4 New York Yates 27 1950 2008

AES Greenidge LLC 2527_B_5 New York Yates 27 1950 2008

AES Greenidge LLC 2527_B_6 New York Yates 106 1953 2008

Charles R Lowman 56_B_2 Alabama Washington 238 1979 2008

Charles R Lowman 56_B_3 Alabama Washington 238 1980 2008

Barry 3_B_5 Alabama Mobile 750 1971 2008

St Johns River Power Park 207_B_2 Florida Duval 626 1988 2008

Morgantown Generating Plant 1573_B_2 Maryland Charles 620 1971 2008

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 220
2

Bailly 995_B_7 Indiana Porter 160 1962 2008

San Juan 2451_B_1 New Mexico San Juan 322 1976 2008

San Juan 2451_B_3 New Mexico San Juan 495 1979 2008

Weston 4078_B_4 Wisconsin Marathon 519 2008 2008

AES Deepwater 10670_B_AAB001 Texas Harris 140 1986 2007

La Cygne 1241_B_1 Kansas Linn 724 1973 2007

Morgantown Generating Plant 1573_B_1 Maryland Charles 624 1970 2007

PSEG Hudson Generating Station 2403_B_2 New Jersey Hudson 583 1967 2007

San Juan 2451_B_4 New Mexico San Juan 506 1982 2007

Big Bend 645_B_BB04 Florida Hillsborough 457 1985 2007

Cross 130_B_3 South Carolina Berkeley 620 2007 2007

Wygen II 55479_B_4 Wyoming Campbell 90 2007 2007

Council Bluffs 1082_B_4 Iowa Pottawattamie 790 2007 2007

SO2 Controls (FGDs, 2007 – 2012)

Plant Name UniqueID_Final State Name County

Capacity 

MW

On Line 

Year

Scrubber 

Online 

Year

James H Miller Jr 6002_B_1 Alabama Jefferson 684 1978 2011

James H Miller Jr 6002_B_2 Alabama Jefferson 687 1985 2011

James H Miller Jr 6002_B_3 Alabama Jefferson 687 1989 2011

James H Miller Jr 6002_B_4 Alabama Jefferson 688 1991 2011

Cape Fear 2708_B_5 North Carolina Chatham 143 1956 2011

Baldwin Energy Complex 889_B_1 Illinois Randolph 624 1970 2011

Baldwin Energy Complex 889_B_2 Illinois Randolph 629 1973 2011

Baldwin Energy Complex 889_B_3 Illinois Randolph 629 1975 2011

Scherer 6257_B_3 Georgia Monroe 875 1987 2011

Milton R Young 2823_B_B1 North Dakota Oliver 250 1970 2011

W H Sammis 2866_B_6 Ohio Jefferson 630 1969 2011

W H Sammis 2866_B_7 Ohio Jefferson 630 1971 2011

PSEG Hudson Generating Station 2403_B_2 New Jersey Hudson 583 1967 2011

John Sevier 3405_B_1 Tennessee Hawkins 176 1955 2011

John Sevier 3405_B_2 Tennessee Hawkins 176 1955 2011

John Sevier 3405_B_3 Tennessee Hawkins 176 1956 2011

John Sevier 3405_B_4 Tennessee Hawkins 176 1957 2011

Beech Hollow Power Project 82704_B_1 Pennsylvania Washington 272 2011 2011

Longview Power 82702_B_1 West Virginia Monongalia 695 2011 2011

Cliffside 2721_B_6 North Carolina Cleveland 800 2011 2011

AES Greenidge LLC 2527_B_4 New York Yates 27 1950 2010

AES Greenidge LLC 2527_B_5 New York Yates 27 1950 2010

Barry 3_B_5 Alabama Mobile 750 1971 2010

E C Gaston 26_B_5 Alabama Shelby 861 1974 2010

Warrick 6705_B_4 Indiana Warrick 300 1970 2010

Coffeen 861_B_01 Illinois Montgomery 340 1965 2010

Coffeen 861_B_02 Illinois Montgomery 560 1972 2010

Cardinal 2828_B_3 Ohio Jefferson 630 1977 2010

Brandon Shores 602_B_1 Maryland Anne Arundel 643 1984 2010

Brandon Shores 602_B_2 Maryland Anne Arundel 643 1991 2010

Monroe 1733_B_4 Michigan Monroe 775 1974 2010

Cliffside 2721_B_5 North Carolina Cleveland 550 1972 2010

Crystal River 628_B_4 Florida Citrus 720 1982 2010

Bowen 703_B_1BLR Georgia Bartow 713 1971 2010

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 221
3

Crist 641_B_6 Florida Escambia 302 1970 2010

Crist 641_B_7 Florida Escambia 477 1973 2010

Clifty Creek 983_B_1 Indiana Jefferson 217 1955 2010

Clifty Creek 983_B_2 Indiana Jefferson 217 1955 2010

Clifty Creek 983_B_3 Indiana Jefferson 217 1955 2010

Clifty Creek 983_B_4 Indiana Jefferson 217 1955 2010

Clifty Creek 983_B_5 Indiana Jefferson 217 1955 2010

Clifty Creek 983_B_6 Indiana Jefferson 217 1956 2010

Chalk Point LLC 1571_B_1 Maryland Prince George's 341 1964 2010

Chalk Point LLC 1571_B_2 Maryland Prince George's 342 1965 2010

Dickerson 1572_B_1 Maryland Montgomery 182 1959 2010

Dickerson 1572_B_2 Maryland Montgomery 182 1960 2010

Dickerson 1572_B_3 Maryland Montgomery 182 1962 2010

R E Burger 2864_B_7 Ohio Belmont 156 1955 2010

R E Burger 2864_B_8 Ohio Belmont 156 1955 2010

Kyger Creek 2876_B_1 Ohio Gallia 217 1955 2010

Kyger Creek 2876_B_2 Ohio Gallia 217 1955 2010

Kyger Creek 2876_B_3 Ohio Gallia 217 1955 2010

Kyger Creek 2876_B_4 Ohio Gallia 217 1955 2010

Kyger Creek 2876_B_5 Ohio Gallia 217 1955 2010

Cheswick 8226_B_1 Pennsylvania Allegheny 580 1970 2010

PSEG Mercer Generating Station 2408_B_1 New Jersey Mercer 315 1960 2010

PSEG Mercer Generating Station 2408_B_2 New Jersey Mercer 310 1961 2010

Silver Lake 2008_B_4 Minnesota Olmsted 61 1969 2010

Kingston 3407_B_1 Tennessee Roane 135 1954 2010

Kingston 3407_B_2 Tennessee Roane 135 1954 2010

Kingston 3407_B_3 Tennessee Roane 135 1954 2010

Kingston 3407_B_4 Tennessee Roane 135 1954 2010

Kingston 3407_B_5 Tennessee Roane 177 1955 2010

Kingston 3407_B_6 Tennessee Roane 177 1955 2010

Kingston 3407_B_7 Tennessee Roane 177 1955 2010

Kingston 3407_B_8 Tennessee Roane 177 1955 2010

Kingston 3407_B_9 Tennessee Roane 178 1955 2010

Sioux 2107_B_1 Missouri St. Charles 497 1967 2010

Sioux 2107_B_2 Missouri St. Charles 497 1968 2010

Chesterfield 3797_B_5 Virginia Chesterfield 310 1964 2010

Yorktown 3809_B_1 Virginia York 159 1957 2010

AES Westover 2526_B_11 New York Broome 22 1943 2010

AES Westover 2526_B_12 New York Broome 22 1943 2010

AES Westover 2526_B_13 New York Broome 84 1951 2010

Iatan 2 6065_B_2 Missouri Platte 850 2010 2010

Southwest 6195_B_2 Missouri Greene 300 2010 2010

Trimble Station (LGE) 6071_B_2 Kentucky Trimble 732 2010 2010

Elm Road Generating Station 56068_B_2 Wisconsin Milwaukee 615 2010 2010

Cholla 113_B_3 Arizona Navajo 271 1980 2009

Mayo 6250_B_1A North Carolina Person 362 1983 2009

Mayo 6250_B_1B North Carolina Person 362 1983 2009

Conesville 2840_B_4 Ohio Coshocton 780 1973 2009

G G Allen 2718_B_1 North Carolina Gaston 162 1957 2009

G G Allen 2718_B_2 North Carolina Gaston 162 1957 2009

G G Allen 2718_B_3 North Carolina Gaston 260 1959 2009

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 222
4

G G Allen 2718_B_4 North Carolina Gaston 275 1960 2009

G G Allen 2718_B_5 North Carolina Gaston 265 1961 2009

H L Spurlock 6041_B_1 Kentucky Mason 315 1977 2009

Crystal River 628_B_5 Florida Citrus 717 1984 2009

Deerhaven Generating Station 663_B_B2 Florida Alachua 228 1981 2009

Bowen 703_B_2BLR Georgia Bartow 718 1972 2009

Wansley 6052_B_2 Georgia Heard 892 1978 2009

E W Brown 1355_B_1 Kentucky Mercer 94 1957 2009

E W Brown 1355_B_2 Kentucky Mercer 160 1963 2009

E W Brown 1355_B_3 Kentucky Mercer 422 1971 2009

Ghent 1356_B_2 Kentucky Carroll 469 1977 2009

Fayette Power Project 6179_B_1 Texas Fayette 598 1979 2009

Fayette Power Project 6179_B_2 Texas Fayette 598 1980 2009

Morgantown Generating Plant 1573_B_1 Maryland Charles 624 1970 2009

Morgantown Generating Plant 1573_B_2 Maryland Charles 620 1971 2009

PPL Brunner Island 3140_B_1 Pennsylvania York 321 1961 2009

PPL Brunner Island 3140_B_2 Pennsylvania York 378 1965 2009

Keystone 3136_B_1 Pennsylvania Armstrong 850 1967 2009

Keystone 3136_B_2 Pennsylvania Armstrong 850 1968 2009

Bull Run 3396_B_1 Tennessee Anderson 881 1967 2009

Bay Shore 2878_B_4 Ohio Lucas 215 1968 2009

Hatfields Ferry Power Station 3179_B_1 Pennsylvania Greene 530 1969 2009

Hatfields Ferry Power Station 3179_B_2 Pennsylvania Greene 530 1970 2009

Hatfields Ferry Power Station 3179_B_3 Pennsylvania Greene 530 1971 2009

Nebraska City Unit 2 6096_B_2 Nebraska Otoe 663 2009 2009

Cross 130_B_4 South Carolina Berkeley 652 2009 2009

Springerville 8223_B_4 Arizona Apache 400 2009 2009

Sandow 5 82010_B_5 Texas Milam 600 2009 2009

Oak Grove 82011_B_1 Texas Robertson 800 2009 2009

Oak Grove 82011_B_2 Texas Robertson 800 2009 2009

TS Power Plant 82013_B_1 Nevada Eureka 200 2009 2009

Plum Point Energy 82014_B_1 Arkansas Mississippi 665 2009 2009

Comanche 470_B_3 Colorado Pueblo 750 2009 2009

Elm Road Generating Station 56068_B_1 Wisconsin Milwaukee 615 2009 2009

Two Elk Generating Station 55360_B_1 Wyoming Campbell 300 2009 2009

J K Spruce 7097_B_BLR2 Texas Bexar 750 2009 2009

Dallman 963_B_34 Illinois Sangamon 200 2009 2009

Charles R Lowman 56_B_1 Alabama Washington 86 1969 2008

John E Amos 3935_B_1 West Virginia Putnam 800 1971 2008

John E Amos 3935_B_2 West Virginia Putnam 800 1972 2008

Cholla 113_B_4 Arizona Navajo 380 1981 2008

Roxboro 2712_B_1 North Carolina Person 369 1966 2008

Roxboro 2712_B_3A North Carolina Person 341 1973 2008

Roxboro 2712_B_3B North Carolina Person 341 1973 2008

Miami Fort 2832_B_7 Ohio Hamilton 500 1975 2008

Miami Fort 2832_B_8 Ohio Hamilton 500 1978 2008

Cogentrix Virginia Leasing Corp 10071_B_2A Virginia Portsmouth 19 1988 2008

Cogentrix Virginia Leasing Corp 10071_B_2B Virginia Portsmouth 19 1988 2008

Cogentrix Virginia Leasing Corp 10071_B_2C Virginia Portsmouth 19 1988 2008

J M Stuart 2850_B_1 Ohio Adams 585 1971 2008

J M Stuart 2850_B_2 Ohio Adams 597 1970 2008

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 223
5

J M Stuart 2850_B_3 Ohio Adams 597 1972 2008

J M Stuart 2850_B_4 Ohio Adams 597 1974 2008

Monroe 1733_B_3 Michigan Monroe 795 1973 2008

Belews Creek 8042_B_1 North Carolina Stokes 1,115 1974 2008

Belews Creek 8042_B_2 North Carolina Stokes 1,115 1975 2008

Bowen 703_B_3BLR Georgia Bartow 902 1974 2008

Bowen 703_B_4BLR Georgia Bartow 929 1975 2008

Hammond 708_B_1 Georgia Floyd 112 1954 2008

Hammond 708_B_2 Georgia Floyd 112 1954 2008

Hammond 708_B_3 Georgia Floyd 112 1955 2008

Hammond 708_B_4 Georgia Floyd 510 1970 2008

Wansley 6052_B_1 Georgia Heard 891 1976 2008

Harding Street 990_B_70 Indiana Marion 435 1973 2008

Cogentrix Hopewell 10377_B_1A Virginia Hopewell (city) 18 1987 2008

Cogentrix Hopewell 10377_B_1B Virginia Hopewell (city) 18 1987 2008

Cogentrix Hopewell 10377_B_1C Virginia Hopewell (city) 18 1987 2008

Ghent 1356_B_4 Kentucky Carroll 478 1984 2008

Council Bluffs 1082_B_3 Iowa Pottawattamie 690 1978 2008

PPL Brunner Island 3140_B_3 Pennsylvania York 749 1969 2008

PPL Montour 3149_B_1 Pennsylvania Montour 774 1972 2008

PPL Montour 3149_B_2 Pennsylvania Montour 766 1973 2008

Comanche 470_B_1 Colorado Pueblo 366 1973 2008

Comanche 470_B_2 Colorado Pueblo 370 1975 2008

Cayuga 1001_B_2 Indiana VermilIon 473 1972 2008

Winyah 6249_B_1 South Carolina Georgetown 295 1975 2008

Winyah 6249_B_2 South Carolina Georgetown 295 1977 2008

Winyah 6249_B_3 South Carolina Georgetown 295 1980 2008

Chesterfield 3797_B_6 Virginia Chesterfield 658 1969 2008

Brayton Point 1619_B_1 Massachusetts Bristo 243 1963 2008

Brayton Point 1619_B_2 Massachusetts Bristo 244 1964 2008

Weston 4078_B_4 Wisconsin Marathon 519 2008 2008

Gorgas 8_B_10 Alabama Walker 690 1972 2007

Gorgas 8_B_8 Alabama Walker 165 1956 2007

Gorgas 8_B_9 Alabama Walker 175 1958 2007

John E Amos 3935_B_3 West Virginia Putnam 1,300 1973 2007

Mountaineer 6264_B_1 West Virginia Mason 1,300 1980 2007

Cardinal 2828_B_1 Ohio Jefferson 600 1967 2007

Cardinal 2828_B_2 Ohio Jefferson 600 1967 2007

Roxboro 2712_B_2 North Carolina Person 639 1968 2007

Roxboro 2712_B_4A North Carolina Person 343 1980 2007

Roxboro 2712_B_4B North Carolina Person 343 1980 2007

Cogentrix Virginia Leasing Corp 10071_B_1A Virginia Portsmouth 19 1988 2007

Cogentrix Virginia Leasing Corp 10071_B_1B Virginia Portsmouth 19 1988 2007

Cogentrix Virginia Leasing Corp 10071_B_1C Virginia Portsmouth 19 1988 2007

Killen Station 6031_B_2 Ohio Adams 615 1982 2007

Marshall 2727_B_2 North Carolina Catawba 378 1966 2007

Marshall 2727_B_3 North Carolina Catawba 657 1969 2007

Cogentrix Hopewell 10377_B_2A Virginia Hopewell (city) 18 1987 2007

Cogentrix Hopewell 10377_B_2B Virginia Hopewell (city) 18 1987 2007

Cogentrix Hopewell 10377_B_2C Virginia Hopewell (city) 18 1987 2007

Ghent 1356_B_3 Kentucky Carroll 478 1981 2007

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 224
6

Louisa 6664_B_101 Iowa Louisa 700 1983 2007

Allen S King 1915_B_1 Minnesota Washington 571 1968 2007

Mitchell 3948_B_1 West Virginia Marshall 800 1971 2007

Gibson 6113_B_1 Indiana Gibson 630 1975 2007

Gibson 6113_B_2 Indiana Gibson 628 1975 2007

Winyah 6249_B_4 South Carolina Georgetown 270 1981 2007

Pleasant Prairie 6170_B_2 Wisconsin Kenosha 617 1985 2007

Cross 130_B_3 South Carolina Berkeley 620 2007 2007

Wygen II 55479_B_4 Wyoming Campbell 90 2007 2007

Council Bluffs 1082_B_4 Iowa Pottawattamie 790 2007 2007

Assumed BART Facilities and Units

State County Fac ID Facility Name Unit ID

MI Bay B2840 CE - KARN/WEADOCK EU00036

MI Bay B2840 CE - KARN/WEADOCK EU00037

MI Eaton B4001 LAN. BW&L ERICKSON EU00007

MI Houghton B6553 UP POWER CO / PORTAGE EU00008

MI Huron B2815 DTE - HARBOR BEACH EU00009

MI Ingham B2647 LAN. BW&L Eckert RG00023

MI Ingham B2647 LAN. BW&L Eckert RG00023

MI Ingham B2647 LAN. BW&L Eckert RG00023

MI Ingham B2647 LAN. BW&L Moores Park RG00021

MI Marquette B4261 WE-ENERGIES EU00029

MI Marquette B4261 WE-ENERGIES EU00030

MI Marquette B4261 WE-ENERGIES EU00031

MI Marquette B4261 WE-ENERGIES EU00032

MI Marquette B4261 WE-ENERGIES EU00033

MI Monroe B2816 DTE - MONROE EU00062

MI Monroe B2816 DTE - MONROE EU00068

MI Monroe B2816 DTE - MONROE EU00063

MI Monroe B2816 DTE - MONROE EU00064

MI Ottawa B2835 CE – CAMPBELL EU00062

MI Ottawa B2835 CE – CAMPBELL EU00061

MI Saint Clair B2796 DTE - ST. CLAIR / BELLE RIVER EU00111

MI Saint Clair B6145 DTE – GREENWOOD EU00009

MI Wayne B2132 WYANDOTTE EU00036

MI Wayne B2185 DETROIT PLD, MISTERSKY EU00014

MI Wayne B2811 DTE – TRENTON EU00035

OH Lake 0243160009 CEI., EASTLAKE PLANT B005

OH 0247030013 Orion Power Midwest B012

OH 0285010188 Dept of Public Utilities, City of Orrville B001

OH 0285010188 Dept of Public Utilities, City of Orrville B004

OH 0448020006 Toledo Edison Co., Bay Shore B003

OH 0448020006 Toledo Edison Co., Bay Shore B004

OH 0616000000 Conesville Power Plant B003

OH 0616000000 Conesville Power Plant B004

OH 0616000000 Conesville Power Plant B007

OH 0641050002 Cardinal Power Plant B001

OH 0641050002 Cardinal Power Plant B002

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 225
7

OH 0641050002 Cardinal Power Plant B003

OH 0641050002 Cardinal Power Plant B004

OH 0641050002 Cardinal Power Plant B008

OH 0641050002 Cardinal Power Plant B009

OH 0641050002 Cardinal Power Plant B009

OH Jefferson 0641160017 W. H. SAMMIS PLANT B011

OH Jefferson 0641160017 W. H. SAMMIS PLANT B012

OH Jefferson 0641160017 W. H. SAMMIS PLANT B013

OH 0684000000 Muskingum River Power Plant B006

OH Adams 0701000007 DP&L, J.M. Stuart Generating Station B001

OH Adams 0701000007 DP&L, J.M. Stuart Generating Station B002

OH Adams 0701000007 DP&L, J.M. Stuart Generating Station B003

OH Adams 0701000007 DP&L, J.M. Stuart Generating Station B004

OH 0701000060 DP&L, Killen Station B001

OH 1409040243 City of Hamilton Dept of Public Utilities B002

OH 1409040243 City of Hamilton Dept of Public Utilities B008

OH 1409040243 City of Hamilton Dept of Public Utilities B009

OH 1413100008 CG&E W. C. BECKJORD B005

OH 1413100008 CG&E W. C. BECKJORD B006

OH 1431350093 CG&E MIAMI FORT STATION B015

IL Peoria 856 Ameren – Edwards 2

IL Sangamon 963 CWLP – Dallman 31

IL Sangamon 963 CWLP – Dallman 32

IL Christian 876 Dominion – Kincaid 1

IL Christian 876 Dominion – Kincaid 2

WI COLUMBIA 111003090 Alliant Energy-Columbia Generating B20

WI COLUMBIA 111003090 Alliant Energy-Columbia Generating B21

WI COLUMBIA 111003090 Alliant Energy-Columbia Generating B22

WI GRANT 122014530 Alliant Energy, Nelson Dewey B22 (unit 2)

WI MILWAUKEE 241007690 We Energies-Oak Creek Station B26 (Unit 6)

WI MILWAUKEE 241007690 We Energies-Oak Creek Station B27 (Unit 7)

WI MILWAUKEE 241007690 We Energies-Oak Creek Station B28

WI MILWAUKEE 241007800 We Energies-Valley Station B21

WI MILWAUKEE 241007800 We Energies-Valley Station B23

WI MILWAUKEE 241007800 We Energies-Valley Station B24

WI BROWN 405031990 WI Public Service Corp - JP Pulliam B27 (unit 8)

WI SHEBOYGAN 460033090 WP & L Alliant Energy – Edgewater B24 

WI BUFFALO 606034110

Dairyland Power Coop Alma Station 

(J.P. Madgett boilers) B25 (+B26)

WI BUFFALO 606034110 Dairyland Power Coop Alma Station B27

WI VERNON 663020930 Dairyland Power Coop Genoa Station B20

WI VERNON 663020930 Dairyland Power Coop Genoa Station B25

IN Porter 995 Bailly 7

IN Porter 995 Bailly 8

IN Vermillion 1001 Cayuga 1

IN Vermillion 1001 Cayuga 2

IN Montgomery 1024 Crawfordsville 6

IN Warrick 1012 Culley 2

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 226
8

IN Warrick 1012 Culley 3

IN Gibson 6113 Gibson 1

IN Gibson 6113 Gibson 2

IN Cass 1032 Logansport 6

IN Sullivan 6213 Merom 1

IN Sullivan 6213 Merom 2

IN LaPorte 997 Michigan City 12

IN Lake 996 Mitchell 11

IN Pike 994 Petersburg 1

IN Pike 994 Petersburg 2

IN Pike 994 Petersburg 3

IN Pike 1043 Ratts 1

IN Pike 1043 Ratts 2

IN Wayne 7335 RPL 2

IN Jasper 6085 Schahfer 14

IN Jasper 6085 Schahfer 15

IN Lake 981 Stateline 4

IN Marion 990 Stout 70

IN Dearborn 988 Tanners Creek 4

IN Vigo 1010 Wabash River 6

IN Warrick 6705 Warrick 4

IA 07-02-005 Cedar Falls Utilities Unit #7 (EU10.1A)

IA 88-01-004

Central Iowa Power Cooperative 

(CIPCO) – Summit Lake Station

CombTurbines (EU 

1/1G, EU2/2G)

IA 70-08-003

Central Iowa Power Cooperative 

(CIPCO) – Fair Station

Unit # 2 (EU 2 & 

EU 2G)

IA 85-01-006 City of Ames - Steam Electric Plant Boiler #7 (EU 2)

IA 29-01-013 Interstate Power & Light - Burlington Main Plant Boiler.

IA 03-03-001 Interstate Power & Light - Lansing

Boiler #4. Sixteen 

units in total.

IA 23-01-014 Interstate Power & Light - ML Kapp

Boiler #2. Six units 

in total.

IA 57-01-042 Interstate Power & Light - Prairie Creek

Boiler #4. Fourteen 

units in total.

IA 78-01-026 MidAmerican Energy Co - Council Bluffs Boiler #3 (EU003)

IA 97-04-010 MidAmerican Energy Co - Neal North

Boilers #1-3 

(EU001 - EU003)

IA 97-04-011 MidAmerican Energy Co - Neal South Boiler #4 (EU003)

IA 70-01-011 Muscatine Power and Water Boiler #8

IA 63-02-005 Pella Municipal Power Plant Boilers #6-8

MN 2709900001 Austin Utilities NE Power Station EU001

MN 2713700027 Hibbing Public Utilities EU003

MN 2703100001 MN Power, Taconite Harbor EU003

MN 2706100004 MN Power, Boswell Energy Center EU003

MN 2701500010 New Ulm Public Utilities EU003 - Boiler 4

MN 2711100002 Otter Tail Power Hoot Lake EU003

MN 2710900011 Rochester Public Utilities, Silver Lake EU003

MN 2710900011 Rochester Public Utilities, Silver Lake EU004

MN 2713700028 Virginia Public Utilities EU003 - Boiler 9

MN 2714100004 Xcel Energy, Sherco EU001, EU002

MN 2716300005 Xcel Energy, Allen S King EU001 - Boiler 1

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 227
9

MN 2705300015 Xcel Energy, Riverside EU003 - Boiler 8

MO 290710003 Ameren -Labadie B1, B2, B3, B4

MO 291830001 Ameren - Sioux B1, B2

MO 290990016 Ameren - Rush Island B1, B2

MO 290950031 Auila - Sibley B3 - 5C

MO 291430004 Assoc. Electric - New Madrid

B1(EP-01), B2 

(EP-02)

MO 290770039 City Utilities Springfield - Southwest B1 (E09)

MO 290770005 City Utilities Springfield - James River EO7, EO8

MO 290970001 Empire Distric Electric - Asbury B7

MO 290830001 KC Power and Light - Montrose EP08

MO 290210004 Aqula - Lake Road EP06

MO 291750001 Assoc. Electric - Thomas Hill EP01, EP02

MO 290950021 Trigen - Kansas City B1A

MO 290190002 City of Columbia Municipal Power Plant EP02

MO 291950010 Marshall Munipal Utilities EP05

MO 290950050 Independence Power & Light-Blue Valley B3 (EP05)

WV 3943 Fort Martin

WV 6004 Pleasants

WV 3948 Mitchell

WV 3935 Amos

WV 6264 Mountaineer

WV 3944 Harrison

TN 3396 TVA Bull Run

TN 3399 TVA Cumberland

KY 1363 Cane Run

KY 1364 Mill Creek

KY 6041 Spurlock

KY 1384 John Sherman Cooper

KY 1353 Big Sandy

KY 1356 Ghent

KY 1355 Brown

KY 1374 Owensboro Municipal

KY 1372 Henderson Municipal

KY 1378 Paradise

KY 1361 Coleman

KY 1382 Reid/Henderson 2

KY 6639 Green

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 228
1

Regional Air Quality Analyses for Ozone, PM2.5, and Regional Haze: 

Final Technical Support Document (Supplement), September 12, 2008

The purpose of this paper is to summarize a new modeling analysis performed by the Lake 

Michigan Air Directors Consortium (LADCO) to address the effect of the recent court decision 

vacating EPA’s Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR). This new modeling is intended to supplement 

the LADCO Technical Support Document (“Regional Air Quality Analyses for Ozone, PM2.5, 

and Regional Haze: Final Technical Support Document”, April 25, 2008), which summarizes the 

air quality analyses conducted by LADCO and its contractors to support the development of 

State Implementation Plans for ozone, PM2.5, and regional haze in the States of Illinois, 

Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin.

Compared to the previous LADCO modeling (Round 5.1), the new modeling shows similar 

results for ozone, but much more nonattainment for PM2.5 and higher visibility levels for 

regional haze. Specifically, the new modeling shows:

Ozone: Attainment of the 0.08 ppm standard by 2009 everywhere in the region, except 

Holland, MI, and nonattainment of the 0.075 ppm standard through at least 2018.

PM2.5: Widespread nonattainment of annual (15 ug/m3) and daily (35 ug/m3) standards.

Haze: Higher visibility levels on the 20% worst visibility days in 2018 in Class I areas in 

the eastern U.S., resulting in most areas being above the glide path.

Background: On July 11, 2008, the U.S. Court of Appeals for D.C. Circuit vacated EPA’s CAIR 

rule (cite). The reductions in NOx and SO2 emissions associated with this rule were a key part 

of the LADCO States’ attainment demonstrations for ozone and PM2.5 and the reasonable 

progress determinations for regional haze. LADCO’s previous modeling (Round 5.1) relied on 

EGU emission projections from EPA’s IPM3.0 analysis, which assumed implementation of 

Phases I and II of CAIR. For this new modeling, alternative EGU emission projections were 

developed, which did not rely on CAIR (or IPM).

Model Set-Up: The new modeling was performed consistent with LADCO’s previous modeling 

(Round 5.1):

Model Version: CAMx v4.50beta_deposition

Future Years: 2009, 2012, 2018

Runs: (a) Ozone: Summer 2005 meteorology with 12 km grids

(b) PM2.5 and haze: Full year 2005 meteorology with 36 km grids

Emission Scenarios: The new modeling assumed the same set of “on the books” controls as 

in LADCO’s previous modeling (Round 5.1) for all sectors, except EGUs. In light of the CAIR 

decision, three new EGU scenarios were prepared:

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 229
2

Scenario A: 2007 CEM-based emissions were projected for all states in the modeling domain 

based on EIA growth rates by state (NERC region) and fuel type. The assumed growth rates for 

the Midwest States were: MAIN (IL, IA, MO, WI): 8.8% (2007-2018); ECAR (IN, KY, MI, OH): 

13.5% (2007-2018); and MAPP (MN): 15.1% (2007-2018). No control was applied. The annual 

emissions were temporalized based on profiles derived from 2004-2006 CEM data. (Note, these 

are the same temporal profiles used in Round 5.1.)

Scenario B. Scenario A emissions for the LADCO States and select neighboring states (e.g., 

MN, IA, MO, KY, TN, and WV) were adjusted by applying legally enforceable controls (i.e., 

emission reductions required by a Consent Decree, state rule, or permit). Only those legally 

enforceable controls identified (and justified) by the States were applied. The States also 

supplied the appropriate control factors. A table summarizing the Scenario B controls is provided 

in Appendix I.

Scenario C. For the years 2009 and 2012, Scenario A emissions for all states were adjusted by 

applying all planned SO2 and NOx controls based on the July 10 CAMD list (i.e., 90% reduction 

for scrubbers, 95% reduction for SCRs). Because the July 10 CAMD list only includes controls 

generally out to 2011, additional SO2 and NOx controls for the year 2018 were assumed for all 

BART-eligible EGUs in the five LADCO State plus MN, IA, MO, KY, TN, and MO list (i.e., 90% 

reduction for scrubbers, 95% reduction for SCRs).

1

 All Scenario B controls were included in 

Scenario C. A table summarizing the Scenario C controls is provided in Appendix II.

Table 1 and Figure 1 provide a summary of the 5-state regional NOx and SO2 emissions for 

each scenario and future year. (Note, the CAIR emissions included here are based on EPA’s 

IPM3.0 modeling.) Several comments on the emissions should be noted:

Summer NOx

• There is llittle difference between the three alternative scenarios and CAIR. This 

suggests that summer ozone concentrations for the alternative scenarios are 

likely to be similar to those predicted with CAIR (i.e., Round 5.1).

Annual NOx:

• There is a significant change in emissions between scenarios, mostly during the 

non-summer months.

• Scenario B reflects application of NOx controls in several states (e.g., IL,OH,WI).

• Because there are relatively few SCRs (in the LADCO States) on the CAMD list, 

Scenario C results in only a small emissions decrease compared to Scenario B.

• Assumed BART controls result in a significant emissions decrease.

Annual SO2

• There is a significant change in emissions between scenarios.

• Scenario B reflects application of SO2 controls in several states (e.g., IL,OH,WI).

• Because there are several FGDs (in the LADCO States) on the CAMD list, 

Scenario C results in a large emissions decrease compared to Scenario B.

• Assumed BART controls result in a significant emissions decrease (i.e., even 

lower emissions than the IPM-estimated CAIR emissions).

 

1

 A subsequent analysis was conducted with the following inventory changes: (a) 95% reduction for 

scrubbers, 90% redcuction for SCRs (consistent with EPA’s default assumptions for IPM), and (b)

revisions provided for a few plants in Indiana and Minnesota. The changes resulted in a relatively small 

difference in the regioinal NOx and SO2 emissions (e.g., about a 2% NOx increase and about a 1-2% 

decrease in SO2). To assess the impact of the changes, PM2.5 modleing was conducted with the new 

Scenario B and Scenario C emissions for 2012. The modeling showed little change in the predicted 

PM2.5 concentrations.

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 230
3

Figure 1. Regional NOx and SO2 Emissions

Summer NOx Emissions

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

20052007

2009A

2009B2009C

2009CAIR

2012A

2012B2012C

2012CAIR

2018A

2018B2018C

2018BART

2018CAIR

Annual NOx Emissions

0

200,000

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

20052007

2009A

2009B2009C

2009CAIR

2012A

2012B2012C

2012CAIR

2018A

2018B2018C

2018BART

2018CAIR

Annual SO2 Emissions

0

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

3,000,000

20052007

2009A

2009B2009C

2009CAIR

2012A

2012B2012C

2012CAIR

2018A

2018B2018C

2018BART

2018CAIR

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 231
4

Table 1. Regional NOx and SO2 Emissions

Summer NOx Emissions (TPD)

2005 2007 2009 A 2009 B 2009 C

2010 

CAIR 2012 A 2012 B 2012 C

2012 

CAIR 2018 A 2018 B 2018 C

2018 CBART2018 

CAIR

IL 305 305 311 311 311 275 340 236 236 266 333 227 227 219 224

IN 393 393 376 376 374 384 393 393 390 368 410 386 383 292 264

MI 393 393 350 350 350 242 366 366 366 229 377 377 377 260 243

OH 408 408 395 355 335 285 423 351 351 290 431 366 366 230 290

WI 413 413 167 160 160 238 184 170 170 177 183 168 168 168 177

1,912 1,912 1,599 1,552 1,530 1,424 1,706 1,516 1,513 1,330 1,734 1,524 1,521 1,169 1,198

Annual NOx Emissions (TPY)

2005 2007 2009 A 2009 B 2009 C

2010 

CAIR 2012 A 2012 B 2012 C

2012 

CAIR 2018 A 2018 B 2018 C

2018 CBART2018 

CAIR

IL 126,786 121,006 124,917 124,917 124,917 83,224 137,438 81,989 81,989 82,248 135,983 79,771 79,771 63,590 69,958

IN 214,727 203,493 203,776 203,776 201,947 133,188 212,790 212,790 210,877 125,541 221,950 212,805 210,810 177,027 90,415

MI 120,332 112,484 112,478 112,478 112,478 83,117 117,621 117,621 117,621 77,897 122,447 122,447 122,447 89,444 79,543

OH 255,554 240,351 240,016 173,071 164,911 94,346 251,065 172,514 172,514 97,679 261,644 179,737 179,737 125,762 95,678

WI 71,414 54,582 56,540 54,065 54,065 53,032 62,266 57,759 57,759 56,480 61,812 56,952 56,952 56,952 56,158

788,812 731,917 737,727 668,307 658,317 446,908 781,179 642,673 640,760 439,845 803,837 651,712 649,717 512,774 391,752

Annual SO2 Emissions (TPY)

2005 2007 2009 A 2009 B 2009 C

2010 

CAIR 2012 A 2012 B 2012 C

2012 

CAIR 2018 A 2018 B 2018 C

2018 CBART2018 

CAIR

IL 326,598 273,467 281,028 281,028 281,028 295,516 309,209 196,238 194,746 267,110 305,364 106,638 105,152 82,351 275,716

IN 866,964 722,301 721,252 721,252 619,486 374,335 754,323 754,323 558,567 379,144 786,551 764,065 559,945 426,695 359,915

MI 350,694 343,487 343,140 343,140 315,326 227,296 358,879 358,879 301,062 233,204 373,964 373,964 313,677 178,680 242,853

OH 1,100,510 960,820 959,466 959,466 693,438 427,145 1,003,633 897,099 572,807 370,532 1,045,945 819,770 481,623 333,740 315,560

WI 181,426 137,562 142,007 142,007 133,738 139,181 156,659 144,818 133,592 139,203 155,818 144,027 132,849 77,214 127,073

2,826,192 2,437,638 2,446,892 2,446,892 2,043,017 1,463,473 2,582,703 2,351,356 1,760,775 1,389,192 2,667,641 2,208,463 1,593,245 1,098,679 1,321,116

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 232
5

Modeling Results: Several tables summarizing the modeling results are provided:

Table 2 - future year ozone and PM2.5 concentrations for key monitors in the 

 LADCO region

Table 3 - number of monitoring sites greater than the National Ambient Air Quality 

 Standards (NNAQS)

Table 4 – visibility levels for Class I areas in the eastern U.S. 

Note, given that Scenario B and BART controls were only applied in an 11-state Midwest 

region, the validity of the results for other Class I areas in the eastern U.S. may be 

questionable. The Scenario C controls, on the other hand, cover all states and are, thus, 

likely valid in other Class I areas.

Spatial plots of the future year ozone and PM2.5 concentrations are provided in Figures 2 – 4. 

Based on these results, the following key findings should be noted:

Ozone 

• There is little change from the previous LADCO modeling (Round 5.1 with CAIR)

• The modeling shows attainment of the 0.08 ppm (85 ppb) standard by 2009, 

except Holland. (Note, Holland does meet this standard by 2012.)

• The modeling shows nonattainment of the 0.075 ppm (75 ppb) standard through 

2018.

PM2.5 - Annual

• There is a significant change from the previous LADCO modeling (Round 5.1 

with CAIR)

• The modeling shows extensive nonattainment of the annual standard.

PM2.5 - Daily 

• There is a significant change from the previous LADCO modeling (Round 5.1 

with CAIR)

• The modeling shows extensive nonattainment of the daily standard.

Haze 

• There is a significant change from the previous LADCO modeling (Round 5.1 

with CAIR)

• The modeling shows higher visibility levels in 2018 for the 20% worst visibility 

days (average about 0.5 deciviews for the northern Class I areas). The resulting 

visibility levels in the northern Class I areas (except Voyageurs) are above the 

glide path.

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 233
2005

Round 5 

with CAIR

Round 5 

with CAIR

Round 5 

with CAIR

Site Site ID Base Year Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen.C-BART

Lake Michigan Area

Chiwaukee 550590019 84.7 82.2 82.2 82.0 82.3 81.1 80.8 80.6 80.9 77.2 77.2 77.0 76.0 76.2

Racine 551010017 80.3 77.8 77.8 77.5 77.5 76.6 76.2 76.1 76.1 72.9 72.3 72.1 71.1 71.2

Milwaukee-Bayside 550890085 82.7 79.9 79.9 79.7 79.8 78.5 78.0 78.0 78.0 74.3 73.6 73.4 72.4 72.7

Harrington Beach 550890009 83.3 80.1 80.1 79.9 80.1 78.6 78.1 78.0 78.3 73.9 73.2 73.1 72.2 72.5

Manitowoc 550710007 85.0 80.8 80.8 80.7 80.8 79.0 78.5 78.4 78.6 73.9 73.2 73.1 72.0 72.5

Sheboygan 551170006 88.0 84.1 84.0 83.9 84.0 82.2 81.7 81.5 81.8 76.9 76.0 75.9 74.8 75.4

Kewaunee 550610002 82.7 78.2 78.2 78.0 78.1 76.4 75.9 75.7 75.9 71.3 70.7 70.5 69.4 69.9

Door County 550290004 88.7 84.1 84.1 83.9 83.9 82.0 81.4 81.3 81.5 76.5 75.6 75.5 74.2 74.7

Hammond 180892008 77.7 76.2 76.2 76.0 75.4 75.6 75.3 75.2 74.6 73.2 72.7 72.6 71.7 71.6

Whiting 180890030 79.3 77.8 77.8 77.7 77.0 77.2 76.9 76.8 76.2 74.8 74.3 74.2 73.2 73.1

Michigan City 180910005 77.0 74.5 74.5 74.3 73.9 73.3 72.9 72.8 72.5 69.7 69.2 69.1 68.1 68.1

Ogden Dunes 181270020 78.3 76.3 76.3 76.2 75.6 75.5 75.1 75.0 74.5 72.9 72.3 72.1 71.2 70.8

Holland 260050003 90.0 85.7 85.7 85.5 85.3 83.5 83.1 82.9 82.8 78.2 77.5 77.3 76.0 76.1

Jenison 261390005 82.0 76.8 76.8 76.7 76.0 75.1 74.6 74.5 74.5 70.2 69.6 69.5 67.9 68.7

Muskegon 261210039 85.0 80.6 80.6 80.5 80.5 78.6 78.2 78.1 78.0 73.5 72.8 72.8 71.5 71.9

Indianapolis Area

Noblesville 189571001 82.7 78.3 78.3 78.1 78.1 76.1 75.9 75.7 75.6 70.2 69.9 69.8 68.9 68.7

Fortville 180590003 78.0 74.1 74.1 73.9 73.9 71.9 71.8 71.7 71.4 66.7 66.5 66.3 65.4 65.1

Fort B. Harrison 180970050 78.7 75.4 75.3 75.2 75.1 73.8 73.6 73.6 73.2 70.6 70.3 70.2 69.3 69.1

Detroit Area

New Haven 260990009 86.0 82.4 82.3 82.1 81.4 81.4 81.2 81.1 80.2 78.1 77.8 77.7 76.5 76.1

Warren 260991003 84.0 82.4 82.3 82.2 81.3 82.1 81.8 81.7 80.7 79.7 79.4 79.3 78.0 77.6

Port Huron 261470005 82.7 78.2 78.2 78.1 77.5 76.5 76.3 76.2 75.5 72.6 72.5 72.3 70.9 70.9

Cleveland Area

Ashtabula 390071001 89.0 84.2 84.1 83.9 83.4 82.0 81.8 81.6 81.0 76.8 76.5 76.4 74.8 75.1

Geauga 390550004 79.3 75.8 75.8 75.6 74.7 74.0 73.8 73.7 72.7 69.5 69.2 69.1 67.6 67.3

Eastlake 390850003 86.3 83.1 83.1 82.9 81.9 81.8 81.6 81.5 80.5 78.2 78.0 77.8 76.5 76.2

Akron 391530020 83.7 79.1 79.1 79.0 78.1 76.9 76.7 76.6 75.6 70.9 70.6 70.4 68.7 68.7

Cincinnati Area

Wilmington 390271002 82.3 77.3 77.4 77.1 77.5 75.3 75.2 74.8 74.9 70.1 69.9 69.5 67.1 68.3

Sycamore 390610006 84.7 81.5 81.4 81.1 81.9 80.4 80.2 79.8 80.3 76.4 76.0 75.7 73.5 74.6

Lebanon 391650007 87.7 82.8 82.8 82.4 83.0 80.8 80.7 80.3 80.7 75.4 75.1 74.8 72.6 74.2

Columbus Area

London 390970007 79.7 75.0 75.0 74.8 75.0 73.0 72.8 72.7 72.6 68.1 67.8 67.6 65.9 66.3

New Albany 390490029 86.3 82.1 82.1 81.9 81.8 80.2 80.0 79.9 79.6 74.7 74.3 74.2 73.3 73.0

Franklin 290490028 80.3 76.7 76.6 76.5 75.9 75.1 74.9 74.8 74.1 70.5 70.2 70.1 70.2 69.0

St. Louis Area

W. Alton (MO) 291831002 86.3 81.1 81.2 81.1 81.0 80.0 79.9 79.9 78.6 76.9 76.8 76.7 74.2 74.9

Orchard (MO) 291831004 87.0 82.1 82.1 82.0 82.0 80.9 80.8 80.7 80.0 77.7 77.6 77.4 75.2 76.2

Sunset Hills (MO) 291890004 82.3 79.2 79.2 79.1 78.7 78.3 78.1 78.1 77.1 75.3 75.2 75.1 73.0 73.9

Arnold (MO) 290990012 82.3 77.8 77.8 77.7 77.2 76.7 76.6 76.5 75.6 73.6 73.4 73.4 71.3 72.0

Margaretta (MO) 295100086 83.0 79.8 79.8 79.7 79.3 78.8 78.7 78.6 77.9 75.7 75.6 75.5 73.7 74.4

Maryland Heights (MO) 291890014 87.3 85.4 85.4 85.3 84.0 84.3 84.1 84.0 81.7 81.1 80.9 80.8 78.4 78.1

Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 without CAIR

Table 2a. Ozone Modeling Results

2009 2012 2018

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 234
2005

Round 5 

with CAIR

Round 5 

with CAIR

Round 5 

with CAIR

Site Site ID Base Year Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen.C-BART

Illinois

Chicago - Washington HS 170310022 15.2 14.9 14.8 14.5 14.1 14.8 14.7 14.2 14.0 15.0 14.6 14.2 13.7 13.9

Chicago - Mayfair 170310052 15.8 15.1 15.1 14.8 14.4 15.1 14.9 14.5 14.2 15.1 14.7 14.3 13.7 13.9

Chicago - Springfield 170310057 15.0 14.6 14.6 14.3 13.9 14.6 14.4 14.0 13.8 14.8 14.4 14.0 13.4 13.7

Chicago - Lawndale 170310076 14.9 14.5 14.5 14.2 13.8 14.5 14.3 13.9 13.7 14.7 14.3 13.9 13.3 13.6

Blue Island 170312001 14.8 14.4 14.4 14.0 13.7 14.4 14.2 13.8 13.6 14.5 14.1 13.7 13.2 13.4

Summit 170313301 15.2 14.9 14.9 14.6 14.2 14.9 14.7 14.3 14.0 15.0 14.6 14.3 13.7 13.9

Cicero 170316005 15.5 15.1 15.1 14.8 14.4 15.1 14.9 14.5 14.3 15.2 14.9 14.4 13.9 14.2

Granite City 171191007 16.7 16.3 16.2 15.9 15.1 16.1 16.0 15.3 14.9 15.9 15.6 14.9 14.2 14.3

E. St. Louis 171630010 15.6 15.2 15.2 14.8 14.1 15.0 14.9 14.3 13.9 14.9 14.6 14.0 13.3 13.4

Indiana

Jeffersonville 180190005 16.4 15.8 15.7 14.8 13.8 15.8 15.6 14.5 13.7 16.0 15.5 14.3 13.7 13.4

Jasper 180372001 15.2 14.3 14.2 13.4 12.4 14.2 14.0 13.0 12.2 14.3 13.9 12.8 12.1 11.8

Gary 180890031 15.6 13.9 13.9 13.5 13.0 13.8 13.6 13.1 12.8 13.7 13.4 12.9 12.3 12.4

Indy-Washington Park 180970078 15.3 14.4 14.4 13.6 12.8 14.3 14.2 13.2 12.6 14.3 13.9 12.9 12.2 12.0

Indy-W 18th Street 180970081 16.0 15.1 15.1 14.3 15.0 14.9 13.9 15.0 14.6 13.5 12.8

Indy- Michigan Street 180970083 15.9 15.0 15.0 14.2 13.4 14.9 14.8 13.8 13.1 14.9 14.5 13.5 12.8 12.6

Michigan

Allen Park 261630001 14.5 11.0 14.0 13.5 13.0 14.0 13.8 13.2 12.8 13.9 13.6 13.0 12.4 12.4

Southwest HS 261630015 15.9 15.3 15.3 14.8 14.2 15.2 15.0 14.4 13.9 15.1 14.8 14.1 13.5 13.5

Linwood 261630016 14.6 14.1 14.1 13.6 13.1 14.0 13.9 13.3 12.8 13.9 13.6 13.0 12.5 12.5

Dearborn 261630033 17.5 17.0 17.0 16.4 15.8 16.9 16.7 16.0 15.5 16.8 16.4 15.7 15.1 15.1

Wyandotte 261630036 14.7 14.2 14.1 13.6 13.1 14.1 13.9 13.3 12.8 14.0 13.7 13.0 12.4 12.5

Ohio

Middletown - Bonita 390170003 16.2 15.3 15.2 14.3 13.5 15.2 15.0 13.9 13.2 15.2 14.8 13.7 13.0 12.8

Fairfield 390170016 15.8 15.1 15.0 14.1 13.1 15.1 14.9 13.7 12.9 15.2 14.7 13.5 12.8 12.5

Cleveland-28th Street 390350027 15.4 14.9 14.9 14.3 13.5 14.7 14.5 13.9 13.2 14.6 14.2 13.5 12.8 12.7

Cleveland-St. Tikhon 390350038 17.4 16.7 16.7 16.0 15.2 16.5 16.3 15.6 14.8 16.3 16.0 15.2 14.4 14.3

Cleveland-Broadway 390350045 16.5 15.9 15.8 15.2 14.4 15.6 15.5 14.8 14.0 15.5 15.1 14.4 13.6 13.5

Cleveland-GT Craig 390350060 17.1 16.5 16.4 15.8 15.0 16.3 16.1 15.4 14.6 16.1 15.7 15.0 14.2 14.1

Newburg Hts - Harvard Ave 390350065 16.0 15.4 15.3 14.7 14.0 15.2 15.0 14.3 13.6 15.1 14.7 14.0 13.2 13.1

Columbus - Fairgrounds 390490024 15.3 14.6 14.5 13.7 12.9 14.4 14.1 13.2 12.6 14.2 13.8 12.8 12.2 12.0

Columbus - Ann Street 390490025 15.1 14.4 14.3 13.5 12.7 14.2 13.9 13.1 12.4 14.1 13.6 12.6 12.0 11.9

Cincinnati - Seymour 390610014 17.3 16.6 16.5 15.5 14.5 16.5 16.3 15.1 14.3 16.6 16.2 14.9 14.2 13.8

Cincinnati - Taft Ave 390610040 15.5 14.8 14.7 13.8 12.8 14.8 14.6 13.4 12.6 14.9 14.5 13.2 12.5 12.2

Cincinnati - 8th Ave 390610042 16.9 12.0 16.1 15.0 14.0 16.1 15.9 14.7 13.8 16.2 15.7 14.4 13.7 13.4

Sharonville 390610043 15.6 14.9 14.8 13.9 12.9 14.9 14.7 13.5 12.7 14.9 14.5 13.3 12.6 12.3

Norwood 390617001 16.2 15.5 15.4 14.4 13.4 15.4 15.2 14.0 13.2 15.5 15.1 13.8 13.1 12.8

St. Bernard 390618001 17.6 16.8 16.7 15.7 14.7 16.7 16.5 15.3 14.4 16.8 16.4 15.1 14.3 14.0

Steubenville 390810016 15.8 14.5 14.4 13.5 12.8 14.3 14.2 13.1 12.5 14.8 14.5 13.3 12.9 12.7

Mingo Junction 390811001 16.5 15.2 15.2 14.3 13.5 15.0 14.9 13.8 13.2 15.6 15.2 14.0 13.6 13.4

Ironton 390870010 15.2 14.8 14.6 13.6 12.8 14.6 14.4 13.2 12.5 14.8 14.1 12.8 12.4 12.3

Dayton 391130032 15.5 14.9 14.8 14.0 13.2 14.8 14.6 13.6 12.9 14.8 14.3 13.3 12.6 12.4

New Boston 391450013 14.7 12.0 14.0 13.0 12.1 14.1 13.8 12.5 11.9 14.2 13.6 12.2 11.7 11.6

Canton - Dueber 391510017 16.3 15.7 15.6 14.8 14.0 15.5 15.3 14.4 13.6 15.4 14.9 14.0 13.3 13.3

Canton - Market 391510020 14.6 11.0 14.1 13.3 12.6 13.9 13.7 12.9 12.3 13.9 13.5 12.6 12.0 11.9

Akron - Brittain 391530017 15.1 14.6 14.5 13.8 13.0 14.4 14.2 13.4 12.7 14.3 13.8 13.0 12.3 12.3

Akron - W. Exchange 391530023 14.3 13.7 13.7 13.0 12.3 13.6 13.3 12.6 12.0 13.4 13.0 12.2 11.6 11.5

Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 without CAIR

2009 2012 2018

Table 2b. PM2.5 Modeling Results (Annual)

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 235
2005

Round 5 

with CAIR

Round 5 

with CAIR

Round 5 

with CAIR

Key Site County Site ID Base Year Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. C - BART

Illinois

Chicago - Washington HS Cook 170310022 36.6 36 36 36 36 36 36 37 36 37 36 37 37 35

Chicago - Mayfair Cook 170310052 40.3 37 37 37 36 37 36 37 36 38 37 37 37 36

Chicago - Springfield Cook 170310057 37.4 34 34 33 32 35 34 33 32 36 34 33 33 31

Chicago - Lawndale Cook 170310076 38.1 35 35 35 35 36 35 36 35 36 35 36 36 34

McCook Cook 170311016 43.0 39 39 39 39 40 39 40 39 40 40 41 40 38

Blue Island Cook 170312001 37.7 35 35 35 34 36 35 36 34 36 35 36 36 33

Schiller Park Cook 170313103 41.6 40 40 40 39 40 40 40 39 41 40 40 39 39

Summit Cook 170313301 40.2 38 38 39 38 39 38 39 38 39 38 39 39 37

Maywood Cook 170316005 39.2 38 38 38 38 38 38 39 38 39 38 39 39 37

Granite City Madison 171191007 39.2 36 36 35 33 36 35 34 33 36 35 35 33 32

E. St. Louis St. Clair 171630010 33.7 31 31 30 28 31 30 29 28 31 30 30 29 28

Indiana

Jeffersonville Clark 180190005 38.4 35 33 31 29 35 34 32 31 37 35 34 33 31

Jasper Dubois 180372001 36.2 32 32 30 28 32 32 30 29 33 31 31 30 28

Gary - IITRI Lake 180890022 39.0 35 35 35 34 35 34 35 34 36 36 36 35 35

Gary - Burr School Lake 180890026 39.0 34 34 34 33 34 34 35 34 34 34 34 34 32

Gary Lake 180890031 35.2 29 28 26 24 28 28 24 24 29 28 27 27 27

Indy-West Street Marion 180970043 38.0 34 34 33 33 35 35 34 33 36 35 34 34 33

Indy-English Avenue Marion 180970066 38.0 34 34 32 32 35 34 33 32 35 34 33 33 32

Indy-Washington Park Marion 180970078 36.6 33 33 32 31 33 33 32 31 34 33 32 32 32

Indy-W 18th Street Marion 180970081 38.3 33 33 31 31 33 33 32 31 34 33 32 32 31

Indy- Michigan Street Marion 180970083 36.0 32 32 29 28 32 31 29 28 32 31 29 29 29

Michigan

Luna Pier Monroe 261150005 38.9 34 34 32 32 34 34 32 32 34 33 32 31 31

Oak Park Oakland 261250001 39.9 38 38 37 36 38 37 37 36 38 37 37 36 35

Port Huron St. Clair 261470005 39.6 36 35 35 34 35 35 35 34 35 35 34 33 33

Ypsilanti Washtenaw 261610008 39.5 37 37 36 35 37 36 36 35 37 36 36 35 34

Allen Park Wayne 261630001 38.6 36 36 36 35 36 35 35 34 36 35 35 34 33

Southwest HS Wayne 261630015 40.1 36 36 36 35 36 35 35 35 36 35 35 34 33

Linwood Wayne 261630016 43.0 40 40 40 39 40 40 40 39 40 39 39 39 38

E 7 Mile Wayne 261630019 41.0 39 39 39 38 39 39 39 38 39 38 38 38 37

Dearborn Wayne 261630033 43.9 41 41 41 40 41 41 41 40 41 40 40 40 39

Wyandotte Wayne 261630036 37.2 36 36 36 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 34

Newberry Wayne 261630038 42.7 39 39 39 38 39 38 38 37 39 38 38 37 36

FIA Wayne 261630039 39.7 35 34 34 33 35 34 34 33 35 34 33 33 31

Ohio

Middleton Butler 390170003 39.3 33 32 29 28 33 33 29 28 34 32 29 28 27

Fairfield Butler 390170016 37.1 32 31 29 27 31 30 28 28 32 30 29 28 27

Butler 390170017 40.8 33 32 30 29 33 33 30 29 33 32 30 29 28

Cleveland-28th Street Cuyahoga 390350027 36.9 34 34 33 32 34 33 33 32 34 33 33 31 31

Cleveland-St. Tikhon Cuyahoga 390350038 44.2 40 40 37 36 40 39 36 35 40 38 36 35 34

Cleveland-Broadway Cuyahoga 390350045 38.8 35 35 33 31 35 34 32 30 35 34 31 29 29

Cleveland-GT Craig Cuyahoga 390350060 42.1 39 39 38 37 39 38 38 37 39 38 37 36 35

Newburg Hts - Harvard Ave Cuyahoga 390350065 38.9 35 35 33 31 35 34 32 30 36 35 32 31 30

Columbus - Fairgrounds Franklin 390490024 38.5 34 34 33 33 34 33 32 32 34 34 33 32 31

Columbus - Ann Street Franklin 390490025 38.5 34 33 31 31 33 33 31 31 34 33 31 31 30

Cincinnait Hamilton 390610006 40.6 33 33 30 27 33 32 29 28 34 32 29 28 27

Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 without CAIR

2009 2012 2018

Table 2c. PM2.5 Modeling Results (Daily)

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 236
2005

Round 5 

with CAIR

Round 5 

with CAIR

Round 5 

with CAIR

Key Site County Site ID Base Year Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. C - BART

Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 without CAIR

2009 2012 2018

Table 2c. PM2.5 Modeling Results (Daily)

Cincinnati - Seymour Hamilton 390610014 38.4 33 33 28 26 33 32 27 25 33 31 29 25 24

Cincinnati - Taft Ave Hamilton 390610040 36.7 31 30 26 24 31 30 26 24 32 29 26 24 23

Cincinnati - 8th Ave Hamilton 390610042 37.3 32 32 30 28 32 31 29 28 33 31 29 28 27

Sharonville Hamilton 390610043 36.0 32 31 30 28 32 31 29 28 32 31 29 28 27

Norwood Hamilton 390617001 38.8 34 33 32 30 33 33 31 30 34 33 31 30 29

St. Bernard Hamilton 390618001 40.6 35 35 32 30 35 34 31 30 35 33 32 31 29

Steubenville Jefferson 390810016 40.7 36 35 32 29 35 34 30 28 37 35 31 29 28

Mingo Junction Jefferson 390811001 42.0 37 37 33 30 37 36 32 30 38 36 32 30 30

Dayton Montgomery391130032 37.8 34 33 31 30 33 33 31 30 34 33 31 31 30

Canton - Dueber Stark 391510017 38.6 33 32 30 28 33 31 30 28 33 30 29 28 27

Akron - Brittain Summit 391530017 38.1 33 33 31 30 33 32 31 30 33 32 30 29 29

Wisconsin

Green Bay - Est High Brown 550090005 37.1 35 34 35 35 34 35 35 34 33 33 33 32 32

Madison Dane 550250047 36.4 33 33 32 32 33 32 32 31 32 31 30 29 29

Milwaukee-Health Center Milwaukee 550790010 38.7 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 34 35 34 34 34 33

Milwaukee-SER Hdqs Milwaukee 550790026 37.4 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 33

Milwaukee-Virginia FS Milwaukee 550790043 39.9 37 37 37 36 37 36 37 36 36 36 37 36 36

Milwaukee- Fire Dept Hdqs Milwaukee 550790099 37.8 34 34 33 33 34 33 33 32 34 33 33 33 32

Waukesha Waukesha 551330027 35.5 32 32 32 31 32 32 32 31 32 31 31 30 29

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 237
10

Table 3. Modeling Results: Number of Sites > NAAQS

Ozone (85 ppb) Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 w/ CAIR

2009 Baseyear Scen. A Scen. B Scen. C Scen. C-BART

IL 0 0 0 0 ---- 0

IN 0 0 0 0 ---- 0

MI 3 1 1 1 ---- 1

OH 4 0 0 0 ---- 0

WI 2 0 0 0 ---- 0

Total 9 1 1 1 1

2012

IL 0 0 0 0 ---- 0

IN 0 0 0 0 ---- 0

MI 3 0 0 0 ---- 0

OH 4 0 0 0 ---- 0

WI 2 0 0 0 ---- 0

Total 9 0 0 0 0

2018

IL 0 0 0 0 0 0

IN 0 0 0 0 0 0

MI 3 0 0 0 0 0

OH 4 0 0 0 0 0

WI 2 0 0 0 0 0

Total 9 0 0 0 0 0

Ozone (75 ppb) Round 5 without CAIR Round5 w/ CAIR

2009 Baseyear Scen. A Scen. B Scen. C Scen. C-BART

IL 12 6 6 6 ---- 4

IN 26 10 9 8 ---- 5

MI 21 12 12 12 ---- 12

OH 45 27 25 24 ---- 21

WI 12 10 10 10 ---- 10

Total 116 65 62 60 ---- 52

2012

IL 12 3 3 3 ---- 1

IN 26 5 4 4 ---- 3

MI 21 9 8 8 ---- 6

OH 45 18 14 12 ---- 11

WI 12 10 9 9 ---- 9

Total 116 45 38 36 30

2018

IL 12 0 0 0 0 0

IN 26 0 0 0 0 0

MI 21 3 3 3 3 3

OH 45 3 3 2 1 1

WI 12 3 2 1 1 1

Total 116 9 8 6 5 5

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 238
11

PM2.5 - Annual Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 w/ CAIR

2009 Baseyear Scen. A Scen. B Scen. C Scen. C-BART

IL 7 4 4 1 ---- 1

IN 6 2 2 0 ---- 0

MI 2 2 2 1 ---- 1

OH 26 13 12 5 ---- 1

WI 0 0 0 0 ---- 0

Total 41 21 20 7 3

2012

IL 7 3 1 1 ---- 0

IN 6 1 1 0 ---- 0

MI 2 2 1 1 ---- 1

OH 26 12 9 4 ---- 0

WI 0 0 0 0 ---- 0

Total 41 18 12 6 1

2018

IL 7 3 1 0 0 0

IN 6 1 1 0 0 0

MI 2 2 1 1 1 1

OH 26 13 8 2 0 0

WI 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 41 19 11 3 1 1

PM2.5 - Daily

Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 w/ CAIR

2009 Baseyear Scen. A Scen. B Scen. C Scen. C-BART

IL 16 7 7 6 ---- 6

IN 13 0 0 0 ---- 0

MI 14 10 9 9 ---- 5

OH 31 4 3 2 ---- 2

WI 8 1 1 1 ---- 1

Total 82 22 20 18 ---- 14

2012

IL 16 9 6 8 ---- 6

IN 13 0 0 0 ---- 0

MI 14 8 6 6 ---- 5

OH 31 3 3 2 ---- 1

WI 8 1 1 1 ---- 1

Total 82 21 16 17 13

2018

IL 16 10 6 8 8 5

IN 13 4 1 1 0 0

MI 14 8 6 6 5 4

OH 31 5 3 2 1 0

WI 8 1 1 1 1 1

Total 82 28 17 18 15 10

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 239
12

Table 4. Modeling Results: Future Year Visibility Levels

Worst 20% 2018

Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 w/ CAIR

Site

Baseline

(2000-2004) 2018 URP Scen. A Scen. B Scen. C

Scen. CBART 

BOWA1 19.86 17.94 19.09 18.87 18.54 18.02 17.94

VOYA2 19.48 17.75 18.60 18.44 18.17 17.77 17.63

SENE1 24.38 21.64 24.02 23.58 23.03 22.38 22.59

ISLE1 21.59 19.43 21.05 20.86 20.62 20.22 20.09

ISLE9 21.59 19.43 20.83 20.58 20.38 19.84 19.84

HEGL1 26.75 23.13 26.24 25.83 24.87 24.23 24.22

MING1 28.15 24.27 27.51 26.98 25.81 24.93 24.74

CACR1 26.36 22.91 25.32 24.80 23.57 22.97 22.44

UPBU1 26.27 22.82 25.31 24.79 23.50 22.79 22.59

MACA1 31.37 26.64 30.11 29.08 27.06 26.24 26.10

DOSO1 29.05 24.69 27.88 26.96 24.36 23.74 23.00

SHEN1 29.31 25.12 28.38 27.65 25.24 24.69 23.92

JARI1 29.12 24.91 28.06 27.21 25.00 24.48 24.06

BRIG1 29.01 25.05 28.10 28.07 26.57 26.25 25.21

LYBR1 24.45 21.48 24.06 23.86 22.58 22.30 21.14

ACAD1 22.89 20.45 22.88 22.76 22.31 22.16 21.49

Best 20% 2018

Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 w/ CAIR

Site

Baseline

(2000-2004) 2018 Max Scen. A Scen. B Scen. C

Scen. CBART

BOWA1 6.42 6.42 6.20 6.17 6.16 6.12 6.14

VOYA2 7.09 7.09 6.87 6.83 6.81 6.78 6.75

SENE1 7.14 7.14 7.80 7.78 7.81 7.77 7.71

ISLE1 6.75 6.75 6.77 6.76 6.72 6.67 6.60

ISLE9 6.75 6.75 6.63 6.61 6.58 6.53 6.52

HEGL1 12.84 12.84 12.17 12.20 12.07 11.63 11.66

MING1 14.46 14.46 13.78 13.77 13.70 13.37 13.28

CACR1 11.24 11.24 10.94 10.99 10.97 10.78 10.52

UPBU1 11.71 11.71 11.18 11.23 11.18 10.96 10.73

MACA1 16.51 16.51 16.32 16.21 15.76 15.34 15.25

DOSO1 12.28 12.28 12.02 11.84 11.27 11.03 11.00

SHEN1 10.93 10.93 10.98 10.91 10.25 10.16 9.91

JARI1 14.21 14.21 14.19 13.98 13.42 13.21 13.14

BRIG1 14.33 14.33 14.32 14.46 14.22 14.17 13.92

LYBR1 6.37 6.37 6.39 6.38 6.31 6.28 6.14

ACAD1 8.78 8.78 8.97 8.96 8.90 8.89 8.82

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 240
13

Figure 2. Ozone Modeling Results

2009 Round 5 – Scen. A Round 5 – Scen. B Round 5 – Scen. C Round 5 - CAIR

2012 Round 5 – Scen. A Round 5 – Scen. B Round 5 – Scen. C Round 5 - CAIR

2018 Round 5 – Scen. A Round 5 – Scen. B Round 5 – Scen. C Round 5 - CAIR

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 241
14

Figure 3. PM2.5 Annual Modeling Results

2009 Round 5 – Scen. A Round 5 – Scen. B Round 5 – Scen. C Round 5 - CAIR

2012 Round 5 – Scen. A Round 5 – Scen. B Round 5 – Scen. C Round 5 - CAIR

2018 Round 5 – Scen. A Round 5 – Scen. B Round 5 – Scen. C Round 5 - CAIR

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 242
15

Figure 4. PM2.5 Daily Modeling Results

2009 Round 5 – Scen. A Round 5 – Scen. B Round 5 – Scen. C Round 5 - CAIR

2012 Round 5 – Scen. A Round 5 – Scen. B Round 5 – Scen. C Round 5 - CAIR

2018 Round 5 – Scen. A Round 5 – Scen. B Round 5 – Scen. C Round 5 - CAIR

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 243
Appendix I

Scenario B (Legally Enforceable) Controls

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 244
NOx – 2009

Point Source Grown and Controlled Emissions by facility for NOX r6s1b_2009 Base Year = 2002

Future Year = 2009

STID=17 CYID=57 fcid=057801AAA name=AES DUCK CREEK

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 57 057801AAA 0001 0001 01 10100202 NOX 0.8147 0.8416 0.8416 0.00 0.00 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

STID=17 CYID=143 fcid=143805AAG name=AES ED EDWARDS STATION

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 143 143805AAG 0001 0001 01 10100202 NOX 3.0515 3.1522 3.1522 0.00 0.00 lnb LNB added by LADCO 

 17 143 143805AAG 0001 0003 01 10100202 NOX 6.9419 7.1708 7.1708 0.00 0.00 lnb LNB added by LADCO 

 17 143 143805AAG 0002 0004 01 10100202 NOX 2.1310 2.2013 2.2013 0.00 0.00 lnb LNB added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 12.1244 12.5243 12.5243 

cyid 12.1244 12.5243 12.5243 

stid 12.9392 13.3659 13.3659 

STID=39 CYID=1 fcid=0701000007 name="DP&L, J.M. STUART GENERATING STATION"

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 39 1 0701000007 R1 B001 B001P1 10100202 NOX 6.9860 6.9756 2.3252 0.85 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 1 0701000007 R2 B002 B002P1 10100202 NOX 3.6327 3.6273 1.2091 0.85 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 1 0701000007 R3 B003 B003P1 10100202 NOX 5.0133 5.0058 1.6686 0.85 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 1 0701000007 R4 B004 B004P1 10100202 NOX 7.8493 7.8376 2.6125 0.85 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 23.4814 23.4464 7.8155 

cyid 23.4814 23.4464 7.8155 

STID=39 CYID=167 fcid=0684000000 name=MUSKINGUM RIVER POWER PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 39 167 0684000000 R1 B001 B001P1 10200501 NOX 0.0017 0.0017 0.0001 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R2 B002 B002P1 10100201 NOX 5.8167 5.8080 0.2904 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R2 B002 B002P2 10100501 NOX 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R3 B003 B003P1 10100201 NOX 7.9017 7.8899 0.3945 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R3 B003 B003P2 10100501 NOX 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R4 B004 B004P1 10100203 NOX 7.8775 7.8657 0.3933 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R4 B004 B004P2 10100501 NOX 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R6 B006 B006P1 10100202 NOX 3.8586 3.8528 0.1926 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R6 B006 B006P2 10100501 NOX 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 25.4561 25.4182 1.2709 

cyid 25.4561 25.4182 1.2709 

stid 48.9375 48.8646 9.0864 

STID=55 CYID=79 fcid=241007800 name=WIS ELECTRIC POWER VALLEY STATION

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 245
STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 55 79 241007800 S11 B21 01 10100202 NOX 2.7972 2.8895 1.6470 0.00 0.43 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 79 241007800 S11 B22 01 10100202 NOX 2.9073 3.0032 1.7118 0.00 0.43 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 79 241007800 S12 B23 01 10100202 NOX 2.3270 2.4038 1.2740 0.00 0.47 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 79 241007800 S12 B24 01 10100202 NOX 2.3427 2.4199 1.2826 0.00 0.47 SCR Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 10.3742 10.7164 5.9154 

cyid 10.3742 10.7164 5.9154 

STID=55 CYID=117 fcid=460033090 name=WP & L Alliant Energy - Edgewater Gen Station

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 55 117 460033090 S11 B23 01 10100203 NOX 1.6197 1.6731 1.0038 0.00 0.40 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 117 460033090 S11 B24 01 10100203 NOX 4.1072 4.2426 3.4789 0.00 0.18 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 117 460033090 S12 B25 01 10100221 NOX 5.6804 5.8677 4.9876 0.00 0.15 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 11.4072 11.7834 9.4703 

cyid 11.4072 11.7834 9.4703 

stid 21.7814 22.4997 15.3857 

 ======== ======== ==========

 83.6581 84.7302 37.8380 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 246
NOx - 2012

Point Source Grown and Controlled Emissions by facility for NOX r6s1b_2012 Base Year = 2002

Future Year = 2012

STID=17 CYID=33 fcid=033801AAA name=AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING CO

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 33 033801AAA 0005 0005 01 10100202 NOX 1.642 1.871 0.9357 0.00 0.500 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 17 33 033801AAA 0006 0006 01 10100202 NOX 2.116 2.413 1.2063 0.00 0.500 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 3.758 4.284 2.1420 

cyid 3.758 4.284 2.1420 

STID=17 CYID=57 fcid=057801AAA name=AES DUCK CREEK

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 57 057801AAA 0001 0001 01 10100202 NOX 0.815 0.929 0.9288 0.00 0.000 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

STID=17 CYID=79 fcid=079808AAA name=AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING CO

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 79 079808AAA 0003 0003 01 10100202 NOX 6.735 7.678 7.6780 0.00 0.000 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 17 79 079808AAA 0012 0013 01 10100501 NOX 5.936 5.378 5.3781 0.00 0.000 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 12.671 13.056 13.0561 

cyid 12.671 13.056 13.0561 

STID=17 CYID=97 fcid=097190AAC name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 97 097190AAC 0016 0031 02 10100401 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO 

STID=17 CYID=137 fcid=137805AAA name=AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING CO

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 137 137805AAA 0003 0003 01 10100202 NOX 5.356 6.106 6.1058 0.00 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCO 

STID=17 CYID=143 fcid=143805AAG name=AES ED EDWARDS STATION

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 143 143805AAG 0001 0001 01 10100202 NOX 3.052 3.479 3.4789 0.00 0.000 lnb LNB added by LADCO 

 17 143 143805AAG 0001 0003 01 10100202 NOX 6.942 7.914 7.9141 0.00 0.000 lnb LNB added by LADCO 

 17 143 143805AAG 0002 0004 01 10100202 NOX 2.131 2.429 2.4294 0.00 0.000 lnb LNB added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 12.124 13.822 13.8224 

cyid 12.124 13.822 13.8224 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 247
STID=17 CYID=167 fcid=167120AAO name=CITY WATER LIGHT & POWER

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 167 167120AAO 0010 0012 01 10100203 NOX 6.527 7.441 0.0074 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SHUTDOWN added by LADCO

 17 167 167120AAO 0010 0013 01 10100203 NOX 2.646 3.017 0.0030 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SHUTDOWN added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 9.173 10.458 0.0105 

cyid 9.173 10.458 0.0105 

STID=17 CYID=179 fcid=179801AAA name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 179 179801AAA 0018 0029 01 10100203 NOX 22.429 25.570 1.2785 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 17 179 179801AAA 0018 0031 01 10100203 NOX 38.993 44.454 2.2227 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 61.422 70.024 3.5012 

cyid 61.422 70.024 3.5012 

STID=17 CYID=197 fcid=197809AAO name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 197 197809AAO 0032 0033 02 10100604 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.800 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

STID=17 CYID=197 fcid=197810AAK name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 197 197810AAK 0011 0016 02 10100222 NOX 5.731 6.534 3.9203 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 17 197 197810AAK 0011 0016 03 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 17 197 197810AAK 0013 0010 02 10100223 NOX 8.598 9.802 0.0098 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO 

 17 197 197810AAK 0013 0010 03 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO 

 17 197 197810AAK 0007 0012 02 10100223 NOX 10.974 12.511 0.0125 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO 

 17 197 197810AAK 0007 0012 03 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 25.303 28.847 3.9426 

cyid 25.303 28.847 3.9426 

stid 130.622 147.527 43.5096 

STID=27 CYID=61 fcid=2706100004 name=Minnesota Power Inc - Boswell Energy Ctr

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 27 61 2706100004 SV003 EU003 001 10100226 NOX 13.661 14.142 2.8284 0.00 0.800 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 27 61 2706100004 SV003 EU003 002 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.800 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 13.661 14.142 2.8284 

cyid 13.661 14.142 2.8284 

STID=27 CYID=109 fcid=2710900011 name=Rochester Public Utilities - Silver Lake

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 248
 27 109 2710900011 SV003 EU004 001 10100202 NOX 2.079 2.152 1.2911 0.00 0.400 SNCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

stid 15.739 16.294 4.1195 

STID=39 CYID=1 fcid=0701000007 name="DP&L, J.M. STUART GENERATING STATION"

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 39 1 0701000007 R1 B001 B001P1 10100202 NOX 6.986 7.296 2.4319 0.85 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 1 0701000007 R2 B002 B002P1 10100202 NOX 3.633 3.794 1.2646 0.85 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 1 0701000007 R3 B003 B003P1 10100202 NOX 5.013 5.235 1.7452 0.85 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 1 0701000007 R4 B004 B004P1 10100202 NOX 7.849 8.197 2.7324 0.85 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 23.481 24.522 8.1740 

cyid 23.481 24.522 8.1740 

STID=39 CYID=31 fcid=0616000000 name=CONESVILLE POWER PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 39 31 0616000000 R4 B004 B004P1 10100212 NOX 20.852 21.776 1.0888 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

STID=39 CYID=167 fcid=0684000000 name=MUSKINGUM RIVER POWER PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 39 167 0684000000 R1 B001 B001P1 10200501 NOX 0.002 0.002 0.0001 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R2 B002 B002P1 10100201 NOX 5.817 6.074 0.3037 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R2 B002 B002P2 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R3 B003 B003P1 10100201 NOX 7.902 8.252 0.4126 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R3 B003 B003P2 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R4 B004 B004P1 10100203 NOX 7.877 8.227 0.4113 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R4 B004 B004P2 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R6 B006 B006P1 10100202 NOX 3.859 4.030 0.2015 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R6 B006 B006P2 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 25.456 26.584 1.3292 

cyid 25.456 26.584 1.3292 

stid 69.789 72.882 10.5920 

STID=55 CYID=79 fcid=241007690 name=WIS ELECTRIC POWER OAK CREEK STATION

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 55 79 241007690 S13 B25 01 10100202 NOX 4.755 5.421 3.0898 0.00 0.430 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 79 241007690 S13 B26 01 10100202 NOX 3.277 3.736 2.2045 0.00 0.410 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 79 241007690 S14 B27 01 10100212 NOX 3.333 3.800 2.8499 0.00 0.250 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 79 241007690 S14 B28 01 10100212 NOX 3.384 3.857 2.9316 0.00 0.240 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 14.749 16.814 11.0757 

STID=55 CYID=79 fcid=241007800 name=WIS ELECTRIC POWER VALLEY STATION

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 249
 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 55 79 241007800 S11 B21 01 10100202 NOX 2.797 3.189 1.8177 0.00 0.430 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 79 241007800 S11 B22 01 10100202 NOX 2.907 3.314 1.8893 0.00 0.430 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 79 241007800 S12 B23 01 10100202 NOX 2.327 2.653 1.4061 0.00 0.470 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 79 241007800 S12 B24 01 10100202 NOX 2.343 2.671 1.4155 0.00 0.470 SCR Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 10.374 11.827 6.5285 

cyid 25.123 28.641 17.6042 

STID=55 CYID=117 fcid=460033090 name=WP & L Alliant Energy - Edgewater Gen Station

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 55 117 460033090 S11 B23 01 10100203 NOX 1.620 1.846 1.1079 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 117 460033090 S11 B24 01 10100203 NOX 4.107 4.682 3.8395 0.00 0.180 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 117 460033090 S12 B25 01 10100221 NOX 5.680 6.476 5.5045 0.00 0.150 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 11.407 13.005 10.4519 

cyid 11.407 13.005 10.4519 

stid 36.530 41.646 28.0562 

 ======== ======== ==========

 252.681 278.349 86.2773 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 250
NOx 2018

Point Source Grown and Controlled Emissions by facility for NOX r6s1b_2018 Base Year = 2002

Future Year = 2018

STID=17 CYID=31 fcid=031600AIN name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 31 031600AIN 0010 0013 01 10100226 NOX 2.283 2.592 1.5550 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 17 31 031600AIN 0010 0013 02 10100601 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 17 31 031600AIN 0012 0016 01 10100226 NOX 3.991 4.531 2.7184 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 17 31 031600AIN 0012 0016 02 10100601 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 6.274 7.122 4.2734 

cyid 6.274 7.122 4.2734 

STID=17 CYID=33 fcid=033801AAA name=AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING CO

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 33 033801AAA 0005 0005 01 10100202 NOX 1.642 1.863 0.9317 0.00 0.500 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 17 33 033801AAA 0006 0006 01 10100202 NOX 2.116 2.402 1.2012 0.00 0.500 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 3.758 4.266 2.1329 

cyid 3.758 4.266 2.1329 

STID=17 CYID=57 fcid=057801AAA name=AES DUCK CREEK

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 57 057801AAA 0001 0001 01 10100202 NOX 0.815 0.925 0.9249 0.00 0.000 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

STID=17 CYID=79 fcid=079808AAA name=AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING CO

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 79 079808AAA 0003 0003 01 10100202 NOX 6.735 7.645 7.6453 0.00 0.000 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 17 79 079808AAA 0012 0013 01 10100501 NOX 5.936 3.984 3.9838 0.00 0.000 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 12.671 11.629 11.6291 

cyid 12.671 11.629 11.6291 

STID=17 CYID=97 fcid=097190AAC name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 97 097190AAC 0016 0031 02 10100401 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO 

STID=17 CYID=137 fcid=137805AAA name=AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING CO

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 137 137805AAA 0003 0003 01 10100202 NOX 5.356 6.080 6.0798 0.00 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCO 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 251
STID=17 CYID=143 fcid=143805AAG name=AES ED EDWARDS STATION

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 143 143805AAG 0001 0001 01 10100202 NOX 3.052 3.464 3.4641 0.00 0.000 lnb LNB added by LADCO 

 17 143 143805AAG 0001 0003 01 10100202 NOX 6.942 7.880 7.8804 0.00 0.000 lnb LNB added by LADCO 

 17 143 143805AAG 0002 0004 01 10100202 NOX 2.131 2.419 2.4191 0.00 0.000 lnb LNB added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 12.124 13.764 13.7636 

cyid 12.124 13.764 13.7636 

STID=17 CYID=167 fcid=167120AAO name=CITY WATER LIGHT & POWER

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 167 167120AAO 0010 0012 01 10100203 NOX 6.527 7.410 0.0074 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SHUTDOWN added by LADCO

 17 167 167120AAO 0010 0013 01 10100203 NOX 2.646 3.004 0.0030 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SHUTDOWN added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 9.173 10.414 0.0104 

cyid 9.173 10.414 0.0104 

STID=17 CYID=179 fcid=179801AAA name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 179 179801AAA 0018 0029 01 10100203 NOX 22.429 25.462 1.2731 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 17 179 179801AAA 0018 0031 01 10100203 NOX 38.993 44.265 2.2132 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 61.422 69.726 3.4863 

cyid 61.422 69.726 3.4863 

STID=17 CYID=197 fcid=197809AAO name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 197 197809AAO 0032 0033 02 10100604 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.800 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

STID=17 CYID=197 fcid=197810AAK name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 197 197810AAK 0011 0016 02 10100222 NOX 5.731 6.506 3.9036 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 17 197 197810AAK 0011 0016 03 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 17 197 197810AAK 0013 0010 02 10100223 NOX 8.598 9.760 0.0098 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO 

 17 197 197810AAK 0013 0010 03 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO 

 17 197 197810AAK 0007 0012 02 10100223 NOX 10.974 12.458 0.0125 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO 

 17 197 197810AAK 0007 0012 03 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 25.303 28.724 3.9258 

cyid 25.303 28.724 3.9258 

stid 136.896 152.649 46.2263 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 252
STID=18 CYID=147 fcid=00020 name=INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER-ROCKPORT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 18 147 00020 1 001 01 10100222 NOX 23.226 25.291 1.2646 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 18 147 00020 1 001 02 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 23.226 25.291 1.2646 

cyid 23.226 25.291 1.2646 

stid 23.226 25.291 1.2646 

STID=27 CYID=61 fcid=2706100004 name=Minnesota Power Inc - Boswell Energy Ctr

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 27 61 2706100004 SV003 EU003 001 10100226 NOX 13.661 15.733 3.1466 0.00 0.800 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 27 61 2706100004 SV003 EU003 002 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.800 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 13.661 15.733 3.1466 

cyid 13.661 15.733 3.1466 

STID=27 CYID=109 fcid=2710900011 name=Rochester Public Utilities - Silver Lake

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 27 109 2710900011 SV003 EU004 001 10100202 NOX 2.079 2.394 1.4363 0.00 0.400 SNCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

stid 15.739 18.127 4.5830 

STID=39 CYID=1 fcid=0701000007 name="DP&L, J.M. STUART GENERATING STATION"

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 39 1 0701000007 R1 B001 B001P1 10100202 NOX 6.986 7.607 2.5358 0.85 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 1 0701000007 R2 B002 B002P1 10100202 NOX 3.633 3.956 1.3186 0.85 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 1 0701000007 R3 B003 B003P1 10100202 NOX 5.013 5.459 1.8197 0.85 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 1 0701000007 R4 B004 B004P1 10100202 NOX 7.849 8.547 2.8491 0.85 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 23.481 25.570 8.5232 

cyid 23.481 25.570 8.5232 

STID=39 CYID=31 fcid=0616000000 name=CONESVILLE POWER PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 39 31 0616000000 R4 B004 B004P1 10100212 NOX 20.852 22.706 1.1353 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

STID=39 CYID=167 fcid=0684000000 name=MUSKINGUM RIVER POWER PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 39 167 0684000000 R1 B001 B001P1 10200501 NOX 0.002 0.002 0.0001 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 253
 39 167 0684000000 R2 B002 B002P1 10100201 NOX 5.817 6.334 0.3167 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R2 B002 B002P2 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R3 B003 B003P1 10100201 NOX 7.902 8.604 0.4302 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R3 B003 B003P2 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R4 B004 B004P1 10100203 NOX 7.877 8.578 0.4289 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R4 B004 B004P2 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R6 B006 B006P1 10100202 NOX 3.859 4.202 0.2101 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 39 167 0684000000 R6 B006 B006P2 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 25.456 27.720 1.3860 

cyid 25.456 27.720 1.3860 

stid 69.789 75.996 11.0445 

STID=54 CYID=39 fcid=0006 name=APPALACHIAN POWER - KANAWHA RIVER PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 54 39 0006 012 001 99 10100202 NOX 4.829 5.258 2.6291 0.00 0.500 SCR Scrubber added by LADCO

 54 39 0006 012 002 99 10100202 NOX 4.921 5.359 2.6794 0.00 0.500 SCR Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 9.750 10.617 5.3085 

cyid 9.750 10.617 5.3085 

stid 9.750 10.617 5.3085 

STID=55 CYID=79 fcid=241007690 name=WIS ELECTRIC POWER OAK CREEK STATION

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 55 79 241007690 S13 B25 01 10100202 NOX 4.755 5.398 3.0766 0.00 0.430 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 79 241007690 S13 B26 01 10100202 NOX 3.277 3.720 2.1951 0.00 0.410 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 79 241007690 S14 B27 01 10100212 NOX 3.333 3.784 2.8378 0.00 0.250 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 79 241007690 S14 B28 01 10100212 NOX 3.384 3.841 2.9191 0.00 0.240 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 14.749 16.743 11.0285 

STID=55 CYID=79 fcid=241007800 name=WIS ELECTRIC POWER VALLEY STATION

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 55 79 241007800 S11 B21 01 10100202 NOX 2.797 3.175 1.4289 0.00 0.550 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 79 241007800 S11 B22 01 10100202 NOX 2.907 3.300 1.4852 0.00 0.550 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 79 241007800 S12 B23 01 10100202 NOX 2.327 2.642 1.1887 0.00 0.550 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 79 241007800 S12 B24 01 10100202 NOX 2.343 2.659 1.1967 0.00 0.550 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 10.374 11.777 5.2995 

cyid 25.123 28.519 16.3281 

STID=55 CYID=117 fcid=460033090 name=WP & L Alliant Energy - Edgewater Gen Station

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 55 117 460033090 S11 B23 01 10100203 NOX 1.620 1.839 1.1032 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 254
 55 117 460033090 S11 B24 01 10100203 NOX 4.107 4.662 3.8232 0.00 0.180 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

 55 117 460033090 S12 B25 01 10100221 NOX 5.680 6.448 5.4811 0.00 0.150 SCR SCR added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 11.407 12.949 10.4074 

cyid 11.407 12.949 10.4074 

stid 36.530 41.469 26.7355 

 ======== ======== ==========

 291.931 324.149 95.1624 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 255
SO2 – 2009

Point Source Grown and Controlled Emissions by facility for SO2 r6s1b_2009 1

Base Year = 2002

Future Year = 2009

STID=19 CYID=115 fcid=58-07-001 name=MIDAMERICAN ENERGY CO. - LOUISA STATION

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 19 115 58-07-001 117487 147281 99 10100222 SO2 33.664 34.774 3.4774 0.0 0.90 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=21 CYID=161 fcid=2116100009 name=EAST KY POWER COOP

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 21 161 2116100009 1 001 99 10100202 SO2 42.166 42.103 4.2103 0.0 0.90 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 21 161 2116100009 2 002 99 10100212 SO2 55.385 55.303 5.5303 0.0 0.90 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 97.551 97.406 9.7406 

cyid 97.551 97.406 9.7406 

stid 97.551 97.406 9.7406 

STID=27 CYID=141 fcid=2714100004 name=NSP - Sherburne Generating Plant

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 27 141 2714100004 SV001 EU001 001 10100222 SO2 16.765 16.987 3.6401 0.3 0.85 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 27 141 2714100004 SV001 EU002 001 10100222 SO2 22.549 22.848 4.8959 0.3 0.85 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 39.314 39.834 8.5360 

cyid 39.314 39.834 8.5360 

stid 39.314 39.834 8.5360 

STID=54 CYID=51 fcid=0005 name=OHIO POWER - MITCHELL PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 54 51 0005 012 001 99 10100202 SO2 17.775 17.748 1.7748 0.0 0.90 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 54 51 0005 012 002 99 10100202 SO2 5.689 5.680 0.5680 0.0 0.90 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 23.463 23.428 2.3428 

cyid 23.463 23.428 2.3428 

STID=54 CYID=53 fcid=0009 name=APPALACHIAN POWER - MOUNTAINEER PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 54 53 0009 001 001 99 10100202 SO2 11.196 11.179 1.1179 0.0 0.90 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=54 CYID=79 fcid=0006 name=APPALACHIAN POWER - JOHN E AMOS PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 256
 54 79 0006 012 001 99 10100202 SO2 79.635 79.516 7.9516 0.0 0.90 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 54 79 0006 003 003 99 10100202 SO2 139.377 139.169 13.9169 0.0 0.90 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 219.012 218.685 21.8685 

cyid 219.012 218.685 21.8685 

stid 253.671 253.293 25.3293 

 ======== ======== ==========

 424.200 425.307 47.0832 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 257
SO2 – 2012

Point Source Grown and Controlled Emissions by facility for SO2 r6s1b_2012 1

Base Year = 2002

Future Year = 2012

STID=17 CYID=31 fcid=031600AMI name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 31 031600AMI 0007 0010 01 10100226 SO2 16.13 18.39 1.839 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=17 CYID=97 fcid=097190AAC name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 97 097190AAC 0018 0033 01 10100226 SO2 24.14 27.52 2.752 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 97 097190AAC 0021 0036 01 10100226 SO2 19.23 21.92 2.192 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 97 097190AAC 0016 0031 01 10100203 SO2 4.59 5.24 0.005 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 47.96 54.68 4.950 

cyid 47.96 54.68 4.950 

STID=17 CYID=125 fcid=125804AAB name=DYNEGY MIDWEST GENERATION INC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 125 125804AAB 0019 0023 01 10100202 SO2 22.34 25.47 3.821 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=17 CYID=127 fcid=127855AAC name=ELECTRIC ENERGY INC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 127 127855AAC 0001 0001 01 10100222 SO2 11.83 13.48 13.482 0.0 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCO 

 17 127 127855AAC 0001 0002 01 10100222 SO2 11.48 13.09 13.085 0.0 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCO 

 17 127 127855AAC 0002 0003 01 10100222 SO2 10.25 11.68 11.680 0.0 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCO 

 17 127 127855AAC 0002 0004 01 10100222 SO2 12.04 13.73 13.731 0.0 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCO 

 17 127 127855AAC 0003 0006 01 10100222 SO2 12.68 14.46 14.456 0.0 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCO 

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 58.27 66.43 66.435 

cyid 58.27 66.43 66.435 

STID=17 CYID=135 fcid=135803AAA name=AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING CO

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 135 135803AAA 0001 0001 01 10100203 SO2 32.99 37.61 3.761 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 135 135803AAA 0001 0003 01 10100203 SO2 72.92 83.13 8.313 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 105.91 120.74 12.074 

cyid 105.91 120.74 12.074 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 258
STID=17 CYID=157 fcid=157851AAA name=DYNEGY MIDWEST GENERATION INC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 157 157851AAA 0001 0001 01 10100203 SO2 25.14 28.66 4.299 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 157 157851AAA 0002 0002 01 10100203 SO2 25.79 29.41 4.411 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 157 157851AAA 0013 0013 01 10100202 SO2 27.79 31.68 4.752 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 78.72 89.75 13.462 

cyid 78.72 89.75 13.462 

STID=17 CYID=167 fcid=167120AAO name=CITY WATER LIGHT & POWER

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 167 167120AAO 0010 0012 01 10100203 SO2 44.20 50.39 0.050 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 167 167120AAO 0010 0013 01 10100203 SO2 16.40 18.70 0.019 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 60.61 69.10 0.069 

cyid 60.61 69.10 0.069 

STID=17 CYID=179 fcid=179801AAA name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 179 179801AAA 0018 0029 01 10100203 SO2 25.35 28.90 2.890 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 179 179801AAA 0018 0031 01 10100203 SO2 41.57 47.39 4.739 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 66.91 76.29 7.629 

cyid 66.91 76.29 7.629 

STID=17 CYID=197 fcid=197810AAK name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 197 197810AAK 0013 0010 03 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 197 197810AAK 0007 0012 02 10100223 SO2 15.33 17.48 0.017 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 197 197810AAK 0007 0012 03 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 15.33 17.48 0.017 

cyid 15.33 17.48 0.017 

stid 472.19 538.32 110.295 

STID=19 CYID=115 fcid=58-07-001 name=MIDAMERICAN ENERGY CO. - LOUISA STATION

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 19 115 58-07-001 117487 147281 99 10100222 SO2 33.66 38.38 3.838 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=21 CYID=161 fcid=2116100009 name=EAST KY POWER COOP

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 259
 21 161 2116100009 1 001 99 10100202 SO2 42.17 44.03 4.403 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 21 161 2116100009 2 002 99 10100212 SO2 55.39 57.84 5.784 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 97.55 101.87 10.187 

cyid 97.55 101.87 10.187 

stid 97.55 101.87 10.187 

STID=27 CYID=61 fcid=2706100004 name=Minnesota Power Inc - Boswell Energy Ctr

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 27 61 2706100004 SV003 EU003 001 10100226 SO2 33.99 35.19 15.081 0.3 0.700 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 27 61 2706100004 SV003 EU003 002 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.3 0.700 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 33.99 35.19 15.081 

cyid 33.99 35.19 15.081 

STID=27 CYID=109 fcid=2710900011 name=Rochester Public Utilities - Silver Lake

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 27 109 2710900011 SV003 EU004 001 10100202 SO2 7.86 8.13 1.220 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=27 CYID=141 fcid=2714100004 name=NSP - Sherburne Generating Plant

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 27 141 2714100004 SV001 EU001 001 10100222 SO2 16.76 17.36 3.719 0.3 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 27 141 2714100004 SV001 EU002 001 10100222 SO2 22.55 23.34 5.002 0.3 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 39.31 40.70 8.721 

cyid 39.31 40.70 8.721 

stid 81.16 84.02 25.023 

STID=39 CYID=13 fcid=0607130015 name=R. E. BURGER PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 39 13 0607130015 R6 B011 B011P1 10100202 SO2 29.83 31.15 3.115 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 39 13 0607130015 R7 B012 B012P1 10100202 SO2 34.77 36.31 3.631 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 64.60 67.46 6.746 

cyid 64.60 67.46 6.746 

STID=39 CYID=31 fcid=0616000000 name=CONESVILLE POWER PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 39 31 0616000000 R4 B004 B004P1 10100212 SO2 316.00 330.00 33.000 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

stid 380.60 397.46 39.746 

STID=47 CYID=1 fcid=0009 name=TVA BULL RUN FOSSIL PLANT

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 260
 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 47 1 0009 S-1 001 99 10100212 SO2 130.81 133.01 13.301 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=47 CYID=73 fcid=0007 name=TVA JOHN SEVIER FOSSIL PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 47 73 0007 S-1A 001 99 10100212 SO2 20.15 20.49 2.049 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 73 0007 S-1B 002 99 10100212 SO2 20.25 20.59 2.059 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 73 0007 S-2A 003 99 10100212 SO2 19.62 19.95 1.995 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 73 0007 S-2B 004 99 10100212 SO2 18.93 19.25 1.925 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 78.95 80.28 8.028 

cyid 78.95 80.28 8.028 

STID=47 CYID=85 fcid=0011 name=TVA JOHNSONVILLE FOSSIL PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 47 85 0011 S1-01 001 99 10100212 SO2 17.06 17.35 1.735 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 85 0011 S1-04 004 99 10100212 SO2 19.85 20.18 2.018 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 85 0011 S1-05 005 99 10100212 SO2 24.11 24.52 2.452 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 61.02 62.04 6.204 

cyid 61.02 62.04 6.204 

STID=47 CYID=145 fcid=0013 name=TVA KINGSTON FOSSIL PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 47 145 0013 S-1 001 99 10100202 SO2 12.68 12.89 1.289 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 145 0013 S-1 002 99 10100202 SO2 14.00 14.24 1.424 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 145 0013 S-1 003 99 10100202 SO2 13.80 14.04 1.404 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 145 0013 S-1 004 99 10100202 SO2 12.24 12.44 1.244 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 145 0013 S-1 005 99 10100202 SO2 19.57 19.90 1.990 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 145 0013 S-2 006 99 10100202 SO2 18.92 19.24 1.924 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 145 0013 S-2 007 99 10100202 SO2 21.30 21.66 2.166 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 145 0013 S-2 008 99 10100202 SO2 18.54 18.85 1.885 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 145 0013 S-2 009 99 10100202 SO2 20.72 21.07 2.107 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 151.77 154.33 15.433 

cyid 151.77 154.33 15.433 

STID=47 CYID=165 fcid=0025 name=TVA GALLATIN FOSSIL PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 47 165 0025 S-01 001 99 10100212 SO2 13.91 14.14 1.414 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 165 0025 S-01 002 99 10100212 SO2 14.87 15.12 1.512 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 165 0025 S-02 003 99 10100212 SO2 16.33 16.60 1.660 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 165 0025 S-02 004 99 10100212 SO2 20.39 20.73 2.073 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 261
fcid 65.49 66.59 6.659 

cyid 65.49 66.59 6.659 

stid 488.04 496.25 49.625 

STID=54 CYID=51 fcid=0005 name=OHIO POWER - MITCHELL PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 54 51 0005 012 001 99 10100202 SO2 17.77 18.56 1.856 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 54 51 0005 012 002 99 10100202 SO2 5.69 5.94 0.594 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 23.46 24.50 2.450 

cyid 23.46 24.50 2.450 

STID=54 CYID=53 fcid=0009 name=APPALACHIAN POWER - MOUNTAINEER PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 54 53 0009 001 001 99 10100202 SO2 11.20 11.69 1.169 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=54 CYID=79 fcid=0006 name=APPALACHIAN POWER - JOHN E AMOS PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 54 79 0006 012 001 99 10100202 SO2 79.63 83.16 8.316 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 54 79 0006 012 002 99 10100202 SO2 100.33 104.78 10.478 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 54 79 0006 003 003 99 10100202 SO2 139.38 145.55 14.555 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 319.35 333.50 33.350 

cyid 319.35 333.50 33.350 

stid 354.00 369.69 36.969 

STID=55 CYID=79 fcid=241007690 name=WIS ELECTRIC POWER OAK CREEK STATION

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 55 79 241007690 S13 B25 01 10100202 SO2 12.75 14.54 3.490 0.0 0.760 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 55 79 241007690 S13 B26 01 10100202 SO2 8.68 9.89 2.473 0.0 0.750 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 55 79 241007690 S14 B27 01 10100212 SO2 10.97 12.51 2.876 0.0 0.770 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 55 79 241007690 S14 B28 01 10100212 SO2 11.28 12.86 2.958 0.0 0.770 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 43.68 49.80 11.797 

cyid 43.68 49.80 11.797 

stid 43.68 49.80 11.797 

 ======== ======== ==========

 1950.90 2075.80 287.480 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 262
SO2 – 2018

Point Source Grown and Controlled Emissions by facility for SO2 r6s1b_2018 1

Base Year = 2002

Future Year = 2018

STID=17 CYID=31 fcid=031600AIN name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 31 031600AIN 0010 0013 01 10100226 SO2 10.92 12.39 1.239 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 31 031600AIN 0012 0016 01 10100226 SO2 17.69 20.08 2.008 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 28.61 32.48 3.248 

STID=17 CYID=31 fcid=031600AMI name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 31 031600AMI 0007 0010 01 10100226 SO2 16.13 18.31 1.831 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

cyid 44.74 50.79 5.079 

STID=17 CYID=79 fcid=079808AAA name=AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING CO

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 79 079808AAA 0003 0003 01 10100202 SO2 36.35 41.27 4.127 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 79 079808AAA 0012 0013 01 10100501 SO2 28.99 19.46 1.946 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 65.34 60.72 6.072 

cyid 65.34 60.72 6.072 

STID=17 CYID=97 fcid=097190AAC name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 97 097190AAC 0018 0033 01 10100226 SO2 24.14 27.40 2.740 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 97 097190AAC 0021 0036 01 10100226 SO2 19.23 21.83 2.183 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 97 097190AAC 0016 0031 01 10100203 SO2 4.59 5.22 0.005 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 47.96 54.45 4.928 

cyid 47.96 54.45 4.928 

STID=17 CYID=125 fcid=125804AAB name=DYNEGY MIDWEST GENERATION INC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 125 125804AAB 0019 0023 01 10100202 SO2 22.34 25.36 3.805 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=17 CYID=127 fcid=127855AAC name=ELECTRIC ENERGY INC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 263
 17 127 127855AAC 0002 0003 01 10100222 SO2 10.25 11.63 11.630 0.0 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCO 

 17 127 127855AAC 0002 0004 01 10100222 SO2 12.04 13.67 13.673 0.0 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCO 

 17 127 127855AAC 0001 0001 01 10100222 SO2 11.83 13.42 1.342 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 127 127855AAC 0001 0002 01 10100222 SO2 11.48 13.03 1.303 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 127 127855AAC 0003 0005 01 10100222 SO2 11.72 13.31 1.331 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 127 127855AAC 0003 0006 01 10100222 SO2 12.68 14.39 1.439 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 70.00 79.46 30.719 

cyid 70.00 79.46 30.719 

STID=17 CYID=135 fcid=135803AAA name=AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING CO

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 135 135803AAA 0001 0001 01 10100203 SO2 32.99 37.45 3.745 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 135 135803AAA 0001 0003 01 10100203 SO2 72.92 82.77 8.277 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 105.91 120.22 12.022 

cyid 105.91 120.22 12.022 

STID=17 CYID=143 fcid=143805AAG name=AES ED EDWARDS STATION

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 143 143805AAG 0002 0004 01 10100202 SO2 15.28 17.34 1.734 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=17 CYID=157 fcid=157851AAA name=DYNEGY MIDWEST GENERATION INC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 157 157851AAA 0001 0001 01 10100203 SO2 25.14 28.54 4.281 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 157 157851AAA 0002 0002 01 10100203 SO2 25.79 29.28 4.392 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 157 157851AAA 0013 0013 01 10100202 SO2 27.79 31.54 4.732 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 78.72 89.36 13.404 

cyid 78.72 89.36 13.404 

STID=17 CYID=167 fcid=167120AAO name=CITY WATER LIGHT & POWER

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 167 167120AAO 0010 0012 01 10100203 SO2 44.20 50.18 0.050 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 167 167120AAO 0010 0013 01 10100203 SO2 16.40 18.62 0.019 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 60.61 68.80 0.069 

cyid 60.61 68.80 0.069 

STID=17 CYID=179 fcid=179801AAA name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 179 179801AAA 0018 0029 01 10100203 SO2 25.35 28.77 2.877 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 179 179801AAA 0018 0031 01 10100203 SO2 41.57 47.19 4.719 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 264
fcid 66.91 75.96 7.596 

cyid 66.91 75.96 7.596 

STID=17 CYID=197 fcid=197809AAO name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 197 197809AAO 0006 0009 01 10100203 SO2 15.89 18.04 1.804 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 197 197809AAO 0016 0031 01 10100202 SO2 27.43 31.13 3.113 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 197 197809AAO 0017 0033 01 10100202 SO2 23.13 26.26 2.626 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 66.45 75.44 7.544 

STID=17 CYID=197 fcid=197810AAK name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 17 197 197810AAK 0009 0014 02 10100222 SO2 11.64 13.21 1.321 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 197 197810AAK 0011 0016 02 10100222 SO2 25.67 29.14 2.914 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 197 197810AAK 0013 0010 03 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 197 197810AAK 0007 0012 02 10100223 SO2 15.33 17.40 0.017 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

 17 197 197810AAK 0007 0012 03 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 52.64 59.75 4.252 

cyid 119.09 135.19 11.796 

stid 696.90 777.66 97.225 

STID=18 CYID=147 fcid=00020 name=INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER-ROCKPORT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 18 147 00020 1 001 01 10100222 SO2 66.42 72.32 7.232 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 18 147 00020 1 001 02 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 66.42 72.32 7.232 

cyid 66.42 72.32 7.232 

stid 66.42 72.32 7.232 

STID=19 CYID=115 fcid=58-07-001 name=MIDAMERICAN ENERGY CO. - LOUISA STATION

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 19 115 58-07-001 117487 147281 99 10100222 SO2 33.66 38.22 3.822 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=21 CYID=127 fcid=2112700003 name=KENTUCKY POWER CO

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 21 127 2112700003 2 002 99 10100202 SO2 104.52 113.82 11.382 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=21 CYID=161 fcid=2116100009 name=EAST KY POWER COOP

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 265
 21 161 2116100009 1 001 99 10100202 SO2 42.17 45.92 4.592 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 21 161 2116100009 2 002 99 10100212 SO2 55.39 60.31 6.031 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 97.55 106.23 10.623 

cyid 97.55 106.23 10.623 

stid 202.07 220.04 22.004 

STID=27 CYID=61 fcid=2706100004 name=Minnesota Power Inc - Boswell Energy Ctr

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 27 61 2706100004 SV003 EU003 001 10100226 SO2 33.99 39.15 16.778 0.3 0.700 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 27 61 2706100004 SV003 EU003 002 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.3 0.700 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 33.99 39.15 16.778 

cyid 33.99 39.15 16.778 

STID=27 CYID=109 fcid=2710900011 name=Rochester Public Utilities - Silver Lake

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 27 109 2710900011 SV003 EU004 001 10100202 SO2 7.86 9.05 1.357 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=27 CYID=141 fcid=2714100004 name=NSP - Sherburne Generating Plant

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 27 141 2714100004 SV001 EU001 001 10100222 SO2 16.76 19.31 4.138 0.3 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 27 141 2714100004 SV001 EU002 001 10100222 SO2 22.55 25.97 5.565 0.3 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 39.31 45.28 9.703 

cyid 39.31 45.28 9.703 

stid 81.16 93.48 27.838 

STID=39 CYID=13 fcid=0607130015 name=R. E. BURGER PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 39 13 0607130015 R6 B011 B011P1 10100202 SO2 29.83 32.48 3.248 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 39 13 0607130015 R7 B012 B012P1 10100202 SO2 34.77 37.86 3.786 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 64.60 70.34 7.034 

cyid 64.60 70.34 7.034 

STID=39 CYID=31 fcid=0616000000 name=CONESVILLE POWER PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 39 31 0616000000 R4 B004 B004P1 10100212 SO2 316.00 344.11 34.411 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=39 CYID=167 fcid=0684000000 name=MUSKINGUM RIVER POWER PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 266
 39 167 0684000000 R2 B002 B002P1 10100201 SO2 65.07 70.85 7.085 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 39 167 0684000000 R2 B002 B002P2 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 39 167 0684000000 R3 B003 B003P1 10100201 SO2 94.58 103.00 10.300 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 39 167 0684000000 R3 B003 B003P2 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 39 167 0684000000 R4 B004 B004P1 10100203 SO2 81.64 88.90 8.890 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 39 167 0684000000 R4 B004 B004P2 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 39 167 0684000000 R5 B005 B005P1 10100203 SO2 97.22 105.87 10.587 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 39 167 0684000000 R5 B005 B005P2 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 39 167 0684000000 R6 B006 B006P1 10100202 SO2 113.96 124.10 12.410 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 39 167 0684000000 R6 B006 B006P2 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 452.48 492.72 49.272 

cyid 452.48 492.72 49.272 

stid 833.08 907.16 90.716 

STID=47 CYID=1 fcid=0009 name=TVA BULL RUN FOSSIL PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 47 1 0009 S-1 001 99 10100212 SO2 130.81 136.82 13.682 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=47 CYID=73 fcid=0007 name=TVA JOHN SEVIER FOSSIL PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 47 73 0007 S-1A 001 99 10100212 SO2 20.15 21.07 2.107 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 73 0007 S-1B 002 99 10100212 SO2 20.25 21.18 2.118 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 73 0007 S-2A 003 99 10100212 SO2 19.62 20.52 2.052 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 73 0007 S-2B 004 99 10100212 SO2 18.93 19.80 1.980 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 78.95 82.57 8.257 

cyid 78.95 82.57 8.257 

STID=47 CYID=85 fcid=0011 name=TVA JOHNSONVILLE FOSSIL PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 47 85 0011 S1-01 001 99 10100212 SO2 17.06 17.84 1.784 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 85 0011 S1-04 004 99 10100212 SO2 19.85 20.76 2.076 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 85 0011 S1-05 005 99 10100212 SO2 24.11 25.22 2.522 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 61.02 63.82 6.382 

cyid 61.02 63.82 6.382 

STID=47 CYID=145 fcid=0013 name=TVA KINGSTON FOSSIL PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 47 145 0013 S-1 001 99 10100202 SO2 12.68 13.26 1.326 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 145 0013 S-1 002 99 10100202 SO2 14.00 14.65 1.465 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 267
 47 145 0013 S-1 003 99 10100202 SO2 13.80 14.44 1.444 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 145 0013 S-1 004 99 10100202 SO2 12.24 12.80 1.280 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 145 0013 S-1 005 99 10100202 SO2 19.57 20.47 2.047 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 145 0013 S-2 006 99 10100202 SO2 18.92 19.79 1.979 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 145 0013 S-2 007 99 10100202 SO2 21.30 22.28 2.228 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 145 0013 S-2 008 99 10100202 SO2 18.54 19.39 1.939 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 145 0013 S-2 009 99 10100202 SO2 20.72 21.68 2.168 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 151.77 158.75 15.875 

cyid 151.77 158.75 15.875 

STID=47 CYID=165 fcid=0025 name=TVA GALLATIN FOSSIL PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 47 165 0025 S-01 001 99 10100212 SO2 13.91 14.54 1.454 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 165 0025 S-01 002 99 10100212 SO2 14.87 15.56 1.556 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 165 0025 S-02 003 99 10100212 SO2 16.33 17.08 1.708 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 47 165 0025 S-02 004 99 10100212 SO2 20.39 21.32 2.132 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 65.49 68.50 6.850 

cyid 65.49 68.50 6.850 

stid 488.04 510.46 51.046 

STID=54 CYID=39 fcid=0006 name=APPALACHIAN POWER - KANAWHA RIVER PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 54 39 0006 012 001 99 10100202 SO2 19.45 21.18 10.591 0.0 0.500 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 54 39 0006 012 002 99 10100202 SO2 20.94 22.80 11.399 0.0 0.500 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 40.39 43.98 21.990 

cyid 40.39 43.98 21.990 

STID=54 CYID=51 fcid=0005 name=OHIO POWER - MITCHELL PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 54 51 0005 012 001 99 10100202 SO2 17.77 19.36 1.936 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 54 51 0005 012 002 99 10100202 SO2 5.69 6.19 0.619 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 23.46 25.55 2.555 

STID=54 CYID=51 fcid=0006 name=OHIO POWER - KAMMER PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 54 51 0006 013 001 99 10100203 SO2 47.06 51.25 5.125 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 54 51 0006 013 002 99 10100203 SO2 47.66 51.90 5.190 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 54 51 0006 013 003 99 10100203 SO2 41.94 45.67 4.567 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 268
---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 136.67 148.82 14.882 

cyid 160.13 174.37 17.437 

STID=54 CYID=53 fcid=0001 name=APPALACHIAN POWER CO.-PHILIP SPORN PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 54 53 0001 014 001 99 10100202 SO2 18.65 20.31 2.031 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 54 53 0001 014 002 99 10100202 SO2 15.87 17.28 1.728 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 54 53 0001 014 003 99 10100202 SO2 21.46 23.36 2.336 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 54 53 0001 014 004 99 10100202 SO2 20.53 22.36 2.236 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 54 53 0001 005 005 99 10100202 SO2 46.82 50.98 5.098 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 123.33 134.30 13.430 

STID=54 CYID=53 fcid=0009 name=APPALACHIAN POWER - MOUNTAINEER PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 54 53 0009 001 001 99 10100202 SO2 11.20 12.19 1.219 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

cyid 134.53 146.49 14.649 

STID=54 CYID=79 fcid=0006 name=APPALACHIAN POWER - JOHN E AMOS PLANT

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 54 79 0006 012 001 99 10100202 SO2 79.63 86.72 8.672 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 54 79 0006 012 002 99 10100202 SO2 100.33 109.26 10.926 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 54 79 0006 003 003 99 10100202 SO2 139.38 151.77 15.177 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 319.35 347.75 34.775 

cyid 319.35 347.75 34.775 

stid 654.39 712.59 88.851 

STID=55 CYID=79 fcid=241007690 name=WIS ELECTRIC POWER OAK CREEK STATION

 Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

 55 79 241007690 S13 B25 01 10100202 SO2 12.75 14.48 3.475 0.0 0.760 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 55 79 241007690 S13 B26 01 10100202 SO2 8.68 9.85 2.462 0.0 0.750 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 55 79 241007690 S14 B27 01 10100212 SO2 10.97 12.45 2.864 0.0 0.770 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

 55 79 241007690 S14 B28 01 10100212 SO2 11.28 12.81 2.945 0.0 0.770 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 43.68 49.59 11.746 

cyid 43.68 49.59 11.746 

stid 43.68 49.59 11.746 

 ======== ======== ==========

 3099.41 3381.52 400.481 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 269
Appendix II

Scenario C Controls (CAMD List)

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 270
1

NOx Controls (SCRs, 2007 – 2013))

Plant Name UniqueID_Final State Name County

Capacity 

MW

On Line 

Year

SCR 

Online 

Year

Chesterfield 3797_B_4 Virginia Chesterfield 166 1960 2013

Chesterfield 3797_B_5 Virginia Chesterfield 310 1964 2012

Scherer 6257_B_3 Georgia Monroe 875 1987 2011

Chesterfield 3797_B_6 Virginia Chesterfield 658 1969 2011

Sandow No 4 6648_B_4 Texas Milam 545 1981 2011

Beech Hollow Power Project 82704_B_1 Pennsylvania Washington 272 2011 2011

Longview Power 82702_B_1 West Virginia Monongalia 695 2011 2011

Cliffside 2721_B_6 North Carolina Cleveland 800 2011 2011

AES Westover 2526_B_11 New York Broome 22 1943 2010

AES Westover 2526_B_12 New York Broome 22 1943 2010

AES Westover 2526_B_13 New York Broome 84 1951 2010

Iatan 2 6065_B_2 Missouri Platte 850 2010 2010

Southwest 6195_B_2 Missouri Greene 300 2010 2010

Trimble Station (LGE) 6071_B_2 Kentucky Trimble 732 2010 2010

Elm Road Generating Station 56068_B_2 Wisconsin Milwaukee 615 2010 2010

Clay Boswell 1893_B_3 Minnesota Itasca 350 1973 2009

Asheville 2706_B_2 North Carolina Buncombe 184 1971 2009

Conesville 2840_B_4 Ohio Coshocton 780 1973 2009

Marshall 2727_B_3 North Carolina Catawba 657 1969 2009

St Johns River Power Park 207_B_1 Florida Duval 626 1987 2009

Ghent 1356_B_2 Kentucky Carroll 469 1977 2009

Chalk Point LLC 1571_B_1 Maryland Prince George's 341 1964 2009

Chalk Point LLC 1571_B_2 Maryland Prince George's 342 1965 2009

San Juan 2451_B_2 New Mexico San Juan 320 1973 2009

Big Bend 645_B_BB01 Florida Hillsborough 411 1970 2009

Big Bend 645_B_BB02 Florida Hillsborough 391 1973 2009

Big Bend 645_B_BB03 Florida Hillsborough 414 1976 2009

Nebraska City Unit 2 6096_B_2 Nebraska Otoe 663 2009 2009

Cross 130_B_4 South Carolina Berkeley 652 2009 2009

Springerville 8223_B_4 Arizona Apache 400 2009 2009

Sandow 5 82010_B_5 Texas Milam 600 2009 2009

Oak Grove 82011_B_1 Texas Robertson 800 2009 2009

Oak Grove 82011_B_2 Texas Robertson 800 2009 2009

TS Power Plant 82013_B_1 Nevada Eureka 200 2009 2009

Plum Point Energy 82014_B_1 Arkansas Mississippi 665 2009 2009

Comanche 470_B_3 Colorado Pueblo 750 2009 2009

Elm Road Generating Station 56068_B_1 Wisconsin Milwaukee 615 2009 2009

Two Elk Generating Station 55360_B_1 Wyoming Campbell 300 2009 2009

J K Spruce 7097_B_BLR2 Texas Bexar 750 2009 2009

Dallman 963_B_34 Illinois Sangamon 200 2009 2009

AES Greenidge LLC 2527_B_4 New York Yates 27 1950 2008

AES Greenidge LLC 2527_B_5 New York Yates 27 1950 2008

AES Greenidge LLC 2527_B_6 New York Yates 106 1953 2008

Charles R Lowman 56_B_2 Alabama Washington 238 1979 2008

Charles R Lowman 56_B_3 Alabama Washington 238 1980 2008

Barry 3_B_5 Alabama Mobile 750 1971 2008

St Johns River Power Park 207_B_2 Florida Duval 626 1988 2008

Morgantown Generating Plant 1573_B_2 Maryland Charles 620 1971 2008

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 271
2

Bailly 995_B_7 Indiana Porter 160 1962 2008

San Juan 2451_B_1 New Mexico San Juan 322 1976 2008

San Juan 2451_B_3 New Mexico San Juan 495 1979 2008

Weston 4078_B_4 Wisconsin Marathon 519 2008 2008

AES Deepwater 10670_B_AAB001 Texas Harris 140 1986 2007

La Cygne 1241_B_1 Kansas Linn 724 1973 2007

Morgantown Generating Plant 1573_B_1 Maryland Charles 624 1970 2007

PSEG Hudson Generating Station 2403_B_2 New Jersey Hudson 583 1967 2007

San Juan 2451_B_4 New Mexico San Juan 506 1982 2007

Big Bend 645_B_BB04 Florida Hillsborough 457 1985 2007

Cross 130_B_3 South Carolina Berkeley 620 2007 2007

Wygen II 55479_B_4 Wyoming Campbell 90 2007 2007

Council Bluffs 1082_B_4 Iowa Pottawattamie 790 2007 2007

SO2 Controls (FGDs, 2007 – 2012)

Plant Name UniqueID_Final State Name County

Capacity 

MW

On Line 

Year

Scrubber 

Online 

Year

James H Miller Jr 6002_B_1 Alabama Jefferson 684 1978 2011

James H Miller Jr 6002_B_2 Alabama Jefferson 687 1985 2011

James H Miller Jr 6002_B_3 Alabama Jefferson 687 1989 2011

James H Miller Jr 6002_B_4 Alabama Jefferson 688 1991 2011

Cape Fear 2708_B_5 North Carolina Chatham 143 1956 2011

Baldwin Energy Complex 889_B_1 Illinois Randolph 624 1970 2011

Baldwin Energy Complex 889_B_2 Illinois Randolph 629 1973 2011

Baldwin Energy Complex 889_B_3 Illinois Randolph 629 1975 2011

Scherer 6257_B_3 Georgia Monroe 875 1987 2011

Milton R Young 2823_B_B1 North Dakota Oliver 250 1970 2011

W H Sammis 2866_B_6 Ohio Jefferson 630 1969 2011

W H Sammis 2866_B_7 Ohio Jefferson 630 1971 2011

PSEG Hudson Generating Station 2403_B_2 New Jersey Hudson 583 1967 2011

John Sevier 3405_B_1 Tennessee Hawkins 176 1955 2011

John Sevier 3405_B_2 Tennessee Hawkins 176 1955 2011

John Sevier 3405_B_3 Tennessee Hawkins 176 1956 2011

John Sevier 3405_B_4 Tennessee Hawkins 176 1957 2011

Beech Hollow Power Project 82704_B_1 Pennsylvania Washington 272 2011 2011

Longview Power 82702_B_1 West Virginia Monongalia 695 2011 2011

Cliffside 2721_B_6 North Carolina Cleveland 800 2011 2011

AES Greenidge LLC 2527_B_4 New York Yates 27 1950 2010

AES Greenidge LLC 2527_B_5 New York Yates 27 1950 2010

Barry 3_B_5 Alabama Mobile 750 1971 2010

E C Gaston 26_B_5 Alabama Shelby 861 1974 2010

Warrick 6705_B_4 Indiana Warrick 300 1970 2010

Coffeen 861_B_01 Illinois Montgomery 340 1965 2010

Coffeen 861_B_02 Illinois Montgomery 560 1972 2010

Cardinal 2828_B_3 Ohio Jefferson 630 1977 2010

Brandon Shores 602_B_1 Maryland Anne Arundel 643 1984 2010

Brandon Shores 602_B_2 Maryland Anne Arundel 643 1991 2010

Monroe 1733_B_4 Michigan Monroe 775 1974 2010

Cliffside 2721_B_5 North Carolina Cleveland 550 1972 2010

Crystal River 628_B_4 Florida Citrus 720 1982 2010

Bowen 703_B_1BLR Georgia Bartow 713 1971 2010

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 272
3

Crist 641_B_6 Florida Escambia 302 1970 2010

Crist 641_B_7 Florida Escambia 477 1973 2010

Clifty Creek 983_B_1 Indiana Jefferson 217 1955 2010

Clifty Creek 983_B_2 Indiana Jefferson 217 1955 2010

Clifty Creek 983_B_3 Indiana Jefferson 217 1955 2010

Clifty Creek 983_B_4 Indiana Jefferson 217 1955 2010

Clifty Creek 983_B_5 Indiana Jefferson 217 1955 2010

Clifty Creek 983_B_6 Indiana Jefferson 217 1956 2010

Chalk Point LLC 1571_B_1 Maryland Prince George's 341 1964 2010

Chalk Point LLC 1571_B_2 Maryland Prince George's 342 1965 2010

Dickerson 1572_B_1 Maryland Montgomery 182 1959 2010

Dickerson 1572_B_2 Maryland Montgomery 182 1960 2010

Dickerson 1572_B_3 Maryland Montgomery 182 1962 2010

R E Burger 2864_B_7 Ohio Belmont 156 1955 2010

R E Burger 2864_B_8 Ohio Belmont 156 1955 2010

Kyger Creek 2876_B_1 Ohio Gallia 217 1955 2010

Kyger Creek 2876_B_2 Ohio Gallia 217 1955 2010

Kyger Creek 2876_B_3 Ohio Gallia 217 1955 2010

Kyger Creek 2876_B_4 Ohio Gallia 217 1955 2010

Kyger Creek 2876_B_5 Ohio Gallia 217 1955 2010

Cheswick 8226_B_1 Pennsylvania Allegheny 580 1970 2010

PSEG Mercer Generating Station 2408_B_1 New Jersey Mercer 315 1960 2010

PSEG Mercer Generating Station 2408_B_2 New Jersey Mercer 310 1961 2010

Silver Lake 2008_B_4 Minnesota Olmsted 61 1969 2010

Kingston 3407_B_1 Tennessee Roane 135 1954 2010

Kingston 3407_B_2 Tennessee Roane 135 1954 2010

Kingston 3407_B_3 Tennessee Roane 135 1954 2010

Kingston 3407_B_4 Tennessee Roane 135 1954 2010

Kingston 3407_B_5 Tennessee Roane 177 1955 2010

Kingston 3407_B_6 Tennessee Roane 177 1955 2010

Kingston 3407_B_7 Tennessee Roane 177 1955 2010

Kingston 3407_B_8 Tennessee Roane 177 1955 2010

Kingston 3407_B_9 Tennessee Roane 178 1955 2010

Sioux 2107_B_1 Missouri St. Charles 497 1967 2010

Sioux 2107_B_2 Missouri St. Charles 497 1968 2010

Chesterfield 3797_B_5 Virginia Chesterfield 310 1964 2010

Yorktown 3809_B_1 Virginia York 159 1957 2010

AES Westover 2526_B_11 New York Broome 22 1943 2010

AES Westover 2526_B_12 New York Broome 22 1943 2010

AES Westover 2526_B_13 New York Broome 84 1951 2010

Iatan 2 6065_B_2 Missouri Platte 850 2010 2010

Southwest 6195_B_2 Missouri Greene 300 2010 2010

Trimble Station (LGE) 6071_B_2 Kentucky Trimble 732 2010 2010

Elm Road Generating Station 56068_B_2 Wisconsin Milwaukee 615 2010 2010

Cholla 113_B_3 Arizona Navajo 271 1980 2009

Mayo 6250_B_1A North Carolina Person 362 1983 2009

Mayo 6250_B_1B North Carolina Person 362 1983 2009

Conesville 2840_B_4 Ohio Coshocton 780 1973 2009

G G Allen 2718_B_1 North Carolina Gaston 162 1957 2009

G G Allen 2718_B_2 North Carolina Gaston 162 1957 2009

G G Allen 2718_B_3 North Carolina Gaston 260 1959 2009

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 273
4

G G Allen 2718_B_4 North Carolina Gaston 275 1960 2009

G G Allen 2718_B_5 North Carolina Gaston 265 1961 2009

H L Spurlock 6041_B_1 Kentucky Mason 315 1977 2009

Crystal River 628_B_5 Florida Citrus 717 1984 2009

Deerhaven Generating Station 663_B_B2 Florida Alachua 228 1981 2009

Bowen 703_B_2BLR Georgia Bartow 718 1972 2009

Wansley 6052_B_2 Georgia Heard 892 1978 2009

E W Brown 1355_B_1 Kentucky Mercer 94 1957 2009

E W Brown 1355_B_2 Kentucky Mercer 160 1963 2009

E W Brown 1355_B_3 Kentucky Mercer 422 1971 2009

Ghent 1356_B_2 Kentucky Carroll 469 1977 2009

Fayette Power Project 6179_B_1 Texas Fayette 598 1979 2009

Fayette Power Project 6179_B_2 Texas Fayette 598 1980 2009

Morgantown Generating Plant 1573_B_1 Maryland Charles 624 1970 2009

Morgantown Generating Plant 1573_B_2 Maryland Charles 620 1971 2009

PPL Brunner Island 3140_B_1 Pennsylvania York 321 1961 2009

PPL Brunner Island 3140_B_2 Pennsylvania York 378 1965 2009

Keystone 3136_B_1 Pennsylvania Armstrong 850 1967 2009

Keystone 3136_B_2 Pennsylvania Armstrong 850 1968 2009

Bull Run 3396_B_1 Tennessee Anderson 881 1967 2009

Bay Shore 2878_B_4 Ohio Lucas 215 1968 2009

Hatfields Ferry Power Station 3179_B_1 Pennsylvania Greene 530 1969 2009

Hatfields Ferry Power Station 3179_B_2 Pennsylvania Greene 530 1970 2009

Hatfields Ferry Power Station 3179_B_3 Pennsylvania Greene 530 1971 2009

Nebraska City Unit 2 6096_B_2 Nebraska Otoe 663 2009 2009

Cross 130_B_4 South Carolina Berkeley 652 2009 2009

Springerville 8223_B_4 Arizona Apache 400 2009 2009

Sandow 5 82010_B_5 Texas Milam 600 2009 2009

Oak Grove 82011_B_1 Texas Robertson 800 2009 2009

Oak Grove 82011_B_2 Texas Robertson 800 2009 2009

TS Power Plant 82013_B_1 Nevada Eureka 200 2009 2009

Plum Point Energy 82014_B_1 Arkansas Mississippi 665 2009 2009

Comanche 470_B_3 Colorado Pueblo 750 2009 2009

Elm Road Generating Station 56068_B_1 Wisconsin Milwaukee 615 2009 2009

Two Elk Generating Station 55360_B_1 Wyoming Campbell 300 2009 2009

J K Spruce 7097_B_BLR2 Texas Bexar 750 2009 2009

Dallman 963_B_34 Illinois Sangamon 200 2009 2009

Charles R Lowman 56_B_1 Alabama Washington 86 1969 2008

John E Amos 3935_B_1 West Virginia Putnam 800 1971 2008

John E Amos 3935_B_2 West Virginia Putnam 800 1972 2008

Cholla 113_B_4 Arizona Navajo 380 1981 2008

Roxboro 2712_B_1 North Carolina Person 369 1966 2008

Roxboro 2712_B_3A North Carolina Person 341 1973 2008

Roxboro 2712_B_3B North Carolina Person 341 1973 2008

Miami Fort 2832_B_7 Ohio Hamilton 500 1975 2008

Miami Fort 2832_B_8 Ohio Hamilton 500 1978 2008

Cogentrix Virginia Leasing Corp 10071_B_2A Virginia Portsmouth 19 1988 2008

Cogentrix Virginia Leasing Corp 10071_B_2B Virginia Portsmouth 19 1988 2008

Cogentrix Virginia Leasing Corp 10071_B_2C Virginia Portsmouth 19 1988 2008

J M Stuart 2850_B_1 Ohio Adams 585 1971 2008

J M Stuart 2850_B_2 Ohio Adams 597 1970 2008

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 274
5

J M Stuart 2850_B_3 Ohio Adams 597 1972 2008

J M Stuart 2850_B_4 Ohio Adams 597 1974 2008

Monroe 1733_B_3 Michigan Monroe 795 1973 2008

Belews Creek 8042_B_1 North Carolina Stokes 1,115 1974 2008

Belews Creek 8042_B_2 North Carolina Stokes 1,115 1975 2008

Bowen 703_B_3BLR Georgia Bartow 902 1974 2008

Bowen 703_B_4BLR Georgia Bartow 929 1975 2008

Hammond 708_B_1 Georgia Floyd 112 1954 2008

Hammond 708_B_2 Georgia Floyd 112 1954 2008

Hammond 708_B_3 Georgia Floyd 112 1955 2008

Hammond 708_B_4 Georgia Floyd 510 1970 2008

Wansley 6052_B_1 Georgia Heard 891 1976 2008

Harding Street 990_B_70 Indiana Marion 435 1973 2008

Cogentrix Hopewell 10377_B_1A Virginia Hopewell (city) 18 1987 2008

Cogentrix Hopewell 10377_B_1B Virginia Hopewell (city) 18 1987 2008

Cogentrix Hopewell 10377_B_1C Virginia Hopewell (city) 18 1987 2008

Ghent 1356_B_4 Kentucky Carroll 478 1984 2008

Council Bluffs 1082_B_3 Iowa Pottawattamie 690 1978 2008

PPL Brunner Island 3140_B_3 Pennsylvania York 749 1969 2008

PPL Montour 3149_B_1 Pennsylvania Montour 774 1972 2008

PPL Montour 3149_B_2 Pennsylvania Montour 766 1973 2008

Comanche 470_B_1 Colorado Pueblo 366 1973 2008

Comanche 470_B_2 Colorado Pueblo 370 1975 2008

Cayuga 1001_B_2 Indiana VermilIon 473 1972 2008

Winyah 6249_B_1 South Carolina Georgetown 295 1975 2008

Winyah 6249_B_2 South Carolina Georgetown 295 1977 2008

Winyah 6249_B_3 South Carolina Georgetown 295 1980 2008

Chesterfield 3797_B_6 Virginia Chesterfield 658 1969 2008

Brayton Point 1619_B_1 Massachusetts Bristo 243 1963 2008

Brayton Point 1619_B_2 Massachusetts Bristo 244 1964 2008

Weston 4078_B_4 Wisconsin Marathon 519 2008 2008

Gorgas 8_B_10 Alabama Walker 690 1972 2007

Gorgas 8_B_8 Alabama Walker 165 1956 2007

Gorgas 8_B_9 Alabama Walker 175 1958 2007

John E Amos 3935_B_3 West Virginia Putnam 1,300 1973 2007

Mountaineer 6264_B_1 West Virginia Mason 1,300 1980 2007

Cardinal 2828_B_1 Ohio Jefferson 600 1967 2007

Cardinal 2828_B_2 Ohio Jefferson 600 1967 2007

Roxboro 2712_B_2 North Carolina Person 639 1968 2007

Roxboro 2712_B_4A North Carolina Person 343 1980 2007

Roxboro 2712_B_4B North Carolina Person 343 1980 2007

Cogentrix Virginia Leasing Corp 10071_B_1A Virginia Portsmouth 19 1988 2007

Cogentrix Virginia Leasing Corp 10071_B_1B Virginia Portsmouth 19 1988 2007

Cogentrix Virginia Leasing Corp 10071_B_1C Virginia Portsmouth 19 1988 2007

Killen Station 6031_B_2 Ohio Adams 615 1982 2007

Marshall 2727_B_2 North Carolina Catawba 378 1966 2007

Marshall 2727_B_3 North Carolina Catawba 657 1969 2007

Cogentrix Hopewell 10377_B_2A Virginia Hopewell (city) 18 1987 2007

Cogentrix Hopewell 10377_B_2B Virginia Hopewell (city) 18 1987 2007

Cogentrix Hopewell 10377_B_2C Virginia Hopewell (city) 18 1987 2007

Ghent 1356_B_3 Kentucky Carroll 478 1981 2007

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 275
6

Louisa 6664_B_101 Iowa Louisa 700 1983 2007

Allen S King 1915_B_1 Minnesota Washington 571 1968 2007

Mitchell 3948_B_1 West Virginia Marshall 800 1971 2007

Gibson 6113_B_1 Indiana Gibson 630 1975 2007

Gibson 6113_B_2 Indiana Gibson 628 1975 2007

Winyah 6249_B_4 South Carolina Georgetown 270 1981 2007

Pleasant Prairie 6170_B_2 Wisconsin Kenosha 617 1985 2007

Cross 130_B_3 South Carolina Berkeley 620 2007 2007

Wygen II 55479_B_4 Wyoming Campbell 90 2007 2007

Council Bluffs 1082_B_4 Iowa Pottawattamie 790 2007 2007

Assumed BART Facilities and Units

State County Fac ID Facility Name Unit ID

MI Bay B2840 CE - KARN/WEADOCK EU00036

MI Bay B2840 CE - KARN/WEADOCK EU00037

MI Eaton B4001 LAN. BW&L ERICKSON EU00007

MI Houghton B6553 UP POWER CO / PORTAGE EU00008

MI Huron B2815 DTE - HARBOR BEACH EU00009

MI Ingham B2647 LAN. BW&L Eckert RG00023

MI Ingham B2647 LAN. BW&L Eckert RG00023

MI Ingham B2647 LAN. BW&L Eckert RG00023

MI Ingham B2647 LAN. BW&L Moores Park RG00021

MI Marquette B4261 WE-ENERGIES EU00029

MI Marquette B4261 WE-ENERGIES EU00030

MI Marquette B4261 WE-ENERGIES EU00031

MI Marquette B4261 WE-ENERGIES EU00032

MI Marquette B4261 WE-ENERGIES EU00033

MI Monroe B2816 DTE - MONROE EU00062

MI Monroe B2816 DTE - MONROE EU00068

MI Monroe B2816 DTE - MONROE EU00063

MI Monroe B2816 DTE - MONROE EU00064

MI Ottawa B2835 CE – CAMPBELL EU00062

MI Ottawa B2835 CE – CAMPBELL EU00061

MI Saint Clair B2796 DTE - ST. CLAIR / BELLE RIVER EU00111

MI Saint Clair B6145 DTE – GREENWOOD EU00009

MI Wayne B2132 WYANDOTTE EU00036

MI Wayne B2185 DETROIT PLD, MISTERSKY EU00014

MI Wayne B2811 DTE – TRENTON EU00035

OH Lake 0243160009 CEI., EASTLAKE PLANT B005

OH 0247030013 Orion Power Midwest B012

OH 0285010188 Dept of Public Utilities, City of Orrville B001

OH 0285010188 Dept of Public Utilities, City of Orrville B004

OH 0448020006 Toledo Edison Co., Bay Shore B003

OH 0448020006 Toledo Edison Co., Bay Shore B004

OH 0616000000 Conesville Power Plant B003

OH 0616000000 Conesville Power Plant B004

OH 0616000000 Conesville Power Plant B007

OH 0641050002 Cardinal Power Plant B001

OH 0641050002 Cardinal Power Plant B002

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 276
7

OH 0641050002 Cardinal Power Plant B003

OH 0641050002 Cardinal Power Plant B004

OH 0641050002 Cardinal Power Plant B008

OH 0641050002 Cardinal Power Plant B009

OH 0641050002 Cardinal Power Plant B009

OH Jefferson 0641160017 W. H. SAMMIS PLANT B011

OH Jefferson 0641160017 W. H. SAMMIS PLANT B012

OH Jefferson 0641160017 W. H. SAMMIS PLANT B013

OH 0684000000 Muskingum River Power Plant B006

OH Adams 0701000007 DP&L, J.M. Stuart Generating Station B001

OH Adams 0701000007 DP&L, J.M. Stuart Generating Station B002

OH Adams 0701000007 DP&L, J.M. Stuart Generating Station B003

OH Adams 0701000007 DP&L, J.M. Stuart Generating Station B004

OH 0701000060 DP&L, Killen Station B001

OH 1409040243 City of Hamilton Dept of Public Utilities B002

OH 1409040243 City of Hamilton Dept of Public Utilities B008

OH 1409040243 City of Hamilton Dept of Public Utilities B009

OH 1413100008 CG&E W. C. BECKJORD B005

OH 1413100008 CG&E W. C. BECKJORD B006

OH 1431350093 CG&E MIAMI FORT STATION B015

IL Peoria 856 Ameren – Edwards 2

IL Sangamon 963 CWLP – Dallman 31

IL Sangamon 963 CWLP – Dallman 32

IL Christian 876 Dominion – Kincaid 1

IL Christian 876 Dominion – Kincaid 2

WI COLUMBIA 111003090 Alliant Energy-Columbia Generating B20

WI COLUMBIA 111003090 Alliant Energy-Columbia Generating B21

WI COLUMBIA 111003090 Alliant Energy-Columbia Generating B22

WI GRANT 122014530 Alliant Energy, Nelson Dewey B22 (unit 2)

WI MILWAUKEE 241007690 We Energies-Oak Creek Station B26 (Unit 6)

WI MILWAUKEE 241007690 We Energies-Oak Creek Station B27 (Unit 7)

WI MILWAUKEE 241007690 We Energies-Oak Creek Station B28

WI MILWAUKEE 241007800 We Energies-Valley Station B21

WI MILWAUKEE 241007800 We Energies-Valley Station B23

WI MILWAUKEE 241007800 We Energies-Valley Station B24

WI BROWN 405031990 WI Public Service Corp - JP Pulliam B27 (unit 8)

WI SHEBOYGAN 460033090 WP & L Alliant Energy – Edgewater B24 

WI BUFFALO 606034110

Dairyland Power Coop Alma Station 

(J.P. Madgett boilers) B25 (+B26)

WI BUFFALO 606034110 Dairyland Power Coop Alma Station B27

WI VERNON 663020930 Dairyland Power Coop Genoa Station B20

WI VERNON 663020930 Dairyland Power Coop Genoa Station B25

IN Porter 995 Bailly 7

IN Porter 995 Bailly 8

IN Vermillion 1001 Cayuga 1

IN Vermillion 1001 Cayuga 2

IN Montgomery 1024 Crawfordsville 6

IN Warrick 1012 Culley 2

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 277
8

IN Warrick 1012 Culley 3

IN Gibson 6113 Gibson 1

IN Gibson 6113 Gibson 2

IN Cass 1032 Logansport 6

IN Sullivan 6213 Merom 1

IN Sullivan 6213 Merom 2

IN LaPorte 997 Michigan City 12

IN Lake 996 Mitchell 11

IN Pike 994 Petersburg 1

IN Pike 994 Petersburg 2

IN Pike 994 Petersburg 3

IN Pike 1043 Ratts 1

IN Pike 1043 Ratts 2

IN Wayne 7335 RPL 2

IN Jasper 6085 Schahfer 14

IN Jasper 6085 Schahfer 15

IN Lake 981 Stateline 4

IN Marion 990 Stout 70

IN Dearborn 988 Tanners Creek 4

IN Vigo 1010 Wabash River 6

IN Warrick 6705 Warrick 4

IA 07-02-005 Cedar Falls Utilities Unit #7 (EU10.1A)

IA 88-01-004

Central Iowa Power Cooperative 

(CIPCO) – Summit Lake Station

CombTurbines (EU 

1/1G, EU2/2G)

IA 70-08-003

Central Iowa Power Cooperative 

(CIPCO) – Fair Station

Unit # 2 (EU 2 & 

EU 2G)

IA 85-01-006 City of Ames - Steam Electric Plant Boiler #7 (EU 2)

IA 29-01-013 Interstate Power & Light - Burlington Main Plant Boiler.

IA 03-03-001 Interstate Power & Light - Lansing

Boiler #4. Sixteen 

units in total.

IA 23-01-014 Interstate Power & Light - ML Kapp

Boiler #2. Six units 

in total.

IA 57-01-042 Interstate Power & Light - Prairie Creek

Boiler #4. Fourteen 

units in total.

IA 78-01-026 MidAmerican Energy Co - Council Bluffs Boiler #3 (EU003)

IA 97-04-010 MidAmerican Energy Co - Neal North

Boilers #1-3 

(EU001 - EU003)

IA 97-04-011 MidAmerican Energy Co - Neal South Boiler #4 (EU003)

IA 70-01-011 Muscatine Power and Water Boiler #8

IA 63-02-005 Pella Municipal Power Plant Boilers #6-8

MN 2709900001 Austin Utilities NE Power Station EU001

MN 2713700027 Hibbing Public Utilities EU003

MN 2703100001 MN Power, Taconite Harbor EU003

MN 2706100004 MN Power, Boswell Energy Center EU003

MN 2701500010 New Ulm Public Utilities EU003 - Boiler 4

MN 2711100002 Otter Tail Power Hoot Lake EU003

MN 2710900011 Rochester Public Utilities, Silver Lake EU003

MN 2710900011 Rochester Public Utilities, Silver Lake EU004

MN 2713700028 Virginia Public Utilities EU003 - Boiler 9

MN 2714100004 Xcel Energy, Sherco EU001, EU002

MN 2716300005 Xcel Energy, Allen S King EU001 - Boiler 1

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 278
9

MN 2705300015 Xcel Energy, Riverside EU003 - Boiler 8

MO 290710003 Ameren -Labadie B1, B2, B3, B4

MO 291830001 Ameren - Sioux B1, B2

MO 290990016 Ameren - Rush Island B1, B2

MO 290950031 Auila - Sibley B3 - 5C

MO 291430004 Assoc. Electric - New Madrid

B1(EP-01), B2 

(EP-02)

MO 290770039 City Utilities Springfield - Southwest B1 (E09)

MO 290770005 City Utilities Springfield - James River EO7, EO8

MO 290970001 Empire Distric Electric - Asbury B7

MO 290830001 KC Power and Light - Montrose EP08

MO 290210004 Aqula - Lake Road EP06

MO 291750001 Assoc. Electric - Thomas Hill EP01, EP02

MO 290950021 Trigen - Kansas City B1A

MO 290190002 City of Columbia Municipal Power Plant EP02

MO 291950010 Marshall Munipal Utilities EP05

MO 290950050 Independence Power & Light-Blue Valley B3 (EP05)

WV 3943 Fort Martin

WV 6004 Pleasants

WV 3948 Mitchell

WV 3935 Amos

WV 6264 Mountaineer

WV 3944 Harrison

TN 3396 TVA Bull Run

TN 3399 TVA Cumberland

KY 1363 Cane Run

KY 1364 Mill Creek

KY 6041 Spurlock

KY 1384 John Sherman Cooper

KY 1353 Big Sandy

KY 1356 Ghent

KY 1355 Brown

KY 1374 Owensboro Municipal

KY 1372 Henderson Municipal

KY 1378 Paradise

KY 1361 Coleman

KY 1382 Reid/Henderson 2

KY 6639 Green

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 279
WEIRTONJANUARY 2005 (WEIRTON 01-05)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 13:42:20: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for January, 2005All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 5.05 15.44 80.54 0.72 0.87 1,251.92 54029 Hancock County 4.44 9.21 60.40 0.54 0.66 813.50 39081 Jefferson County 13.58 12.96 149.65 1.07 0.91 1,260.34 

Totals: 23.06 37.61 290.59 2.32 2.44 3,325.77 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

JANUARY 2005 (WEIRTON 01-05)

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 13:42:20: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for January, 2005

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.05 0.16 0.03 0.09 0.15 

54029 Hancock County 0.05 0.20 0.03 0.10 0.22 39081 Jefferson County 0.14 0.67 0.14 0.59 0.32 

Totals: 0.23 1.03 0.19 0.78 0.69 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONFEBRUARY 2005 (WEIRTON 02-05)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 13:53:00: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for February, 2005All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 5.04 15.43 80.65 0.72 0.87 1,251.92 54029 Hancock County 4.44 9.20 60.52 0.54 0.66 813.50 39081 Jefferson County 13.56 12.93 150.01 1.07 0.91 1,260.34 

Totals: 23.03 37.55 291.17 2.32 2.44 3,325.77 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

FEBRUARY 2005 (WEIRTON 02-05)

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 13:53:00: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for February, 2005

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.05 0.16 0.03 0.09 0.15 

54029 Hancock County 0.05 0.20 0.03 0.10 0.22 39081 Jefferson County 0.14 0.67 0.14 0.59 0.31 

Totals: 0.24 1.03 0.19 0.78 0.67 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

MARCH 2005 (WEIRTON 03-05)

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:03:41: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for March, 2005

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.13 0.25 0.06 0.14 0.22 

54029 Hancock County 0.17 0.31 0.08 0.18 0.33 39081 Jefferson County 0.34 0.96 0.33 1.28 0.47 

Totals: 0.64 1.51 0.47 1.60 1.02 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONMARCH 2005 (WEIRTON 03-05)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:03:41: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for March, 2005All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 10.48 16.91 116.66 0.88 0.98 1,457.56 54029 Hancock County 12.69 11.11 110.91 0.75 0.78 1,087.96 39081 Jefferson County 28.49 19.23 260.79 1.88 1.41 2,008.07 

Totals: 51.67 47.25 488.36 3.51 3.16 4,553.58 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONAPRIL 2005 (WEIRTON 04-05)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:14:26: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for April, 2005All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 10.42 16.79 117.79 0.88 0.98 1,457.56 54029 Hancock County 12.62 10.97 112.22 0.75 0.78 1,087.96 39081 Jefferson County 28.29 18.97 264.52 1.88 1.41 2,008.07 

Totals: 51.33 46.73 494.53 3.51 3.16 4,553.58 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

APRIL 2005 (WEIRTON 04-05)

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:14:26: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for April, 2005

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.16 0.25 0.06 0.14 0.34 

54029 Hancock County 0.20 0.31 0.08 0.18 0.50 39081 Jefferson County 0.43 0.96 0.33 1.28 0.72 

Totals: 0.79 1.51 0.47 1.60 1.56 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONMAY 2005 (WEIRTON 05-05)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:25:05: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for May, 2005All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 10.38 16.70 118.70 0.88 0.98 1,457.56 54029 Hancock County 12.57 10.87 113.29 0.75 0.78 1,087.96 39081 Jefferson County 28.13 18.78 267.54 1.88 1.41 2,008.07 

Totals: 51.07 46.35 499.53 3.51 3.16 4,553.58 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

MAY 2005 (WEIRTON 05-05)

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:25:05: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for May, 2005

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.10 0.25 0.06 0.14 0.50 

54029 Hancock County 0.12 0.31 0.08 0.18 0.74 39081 Jefferson County 0.26 0.96 0.33 1.28 1.07 

Totals: 0.48 1.51 0.47 1.60 2.31 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONJUNE 2005 (WEIRTON 06-05)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:36:14: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for June, 2005All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 20.70 19.09 168.34 1.19 1.18 1,798.35 54029 Hancock County 28.33 13.84 185.63 1.14 1.00 1,546.21 39081 Jefferson County 61.68 27.45 515.08 3.29 2.06 3,255.15 

Totals: 110.71 60.37 869.05 5.62 4.24 6,599.71 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

JUNE 2005 (WEIRTON 06-05)

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:36:14: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for June, 2005

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.21 0.33 0.10 0.19 0.67 

54029 Hancock County 0.29 0.42 0.13 0.25 0.99 39081 Jefferson County 0.65 1.80 0.69 2.38 1.43 

Totals: 1.15 2.54 0.92 2.82 3.09 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONJULY 2005 (WEIRTON 07-05)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:47:36: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for July, 2005All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 20.68 19.04 168.82 1.19 1.18 1,798.35 54029 Hancock County 28.30 13.78 186.24 1.14 1.00 1,546.21 39081 Jefferson County 61.57 27.33 517.22 3.29 2.06 3,255.15 

Totals: 110.55 60.15 872.28 5.62 4.24 6,599.71 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

JULY 2005 (WEIRTON 07-05)

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:47:36: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for July, 2005

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.22 0.33 0.10 0.19 0.79 

54029 Hancock County 0.30 0.42 0.13 0.25 1.16 39081 Jefferson County 0.69 1.80 0.69 2.38 1.68 

Totals: 1.22 2.54 0.92 2.82 3.64 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONAUGUST 2005 (WEIRTON 08-05)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:58:51: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for August, 2005All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 20.68 19.05 168.69 1.19 1.18 1,798.35 54029 Hancock County 28.31 13.79 186.08 1.14 1.00 1,546.21 39081 Jefferson County 61.60 27.36 516.65 3.29 2.06 3,255.15 

Totals: 110.59 60.21 871.42 5.62 4.24 6,599.71 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

AUGUST 2005 (WEIRTON 08-05)

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:58:51: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for August, 2005

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.22 0.33 0.10 0.19 0.76 

54029 Hancock County 0.30 0.42 0.13 0.25 1.12 39081 Jefferson County 0.68 1.80 0.69 2.38 1.63 

Totals: 1.20 2.54 0.92 2.82 3.51 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONSEPTEMBER 2005 (WEIRTON 09-05)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:10:09: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for September, 2005All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 10.38 16.85 119.40 0.90 1.01 1,476.12 54029 Hancock County 12.58 11.06 114.10 0.77 0.81 1,109.45 39081 Jefferson County 28.03 18.56 268.88 1.87 1.39 1,996.25 

Totals: 50.99 46.47 502.37 3.53 3.20 4,581.82 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

SEPTEMBER 2005 (WEIRTON 09-05)

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:10:09: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for September, 2005

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.10 0.25 0.06 0.14 0.58 

54029 Hancock County 0.13 0.31 0.08 0.18 0.85 39081 Jefferson County 0.29 0.96 0.33 1.28 1.24 

Totals: 0.52 1.51 0.47 1.60 2.67 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONOCTOBER 2005 (WEIRTON 10-05)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:20:58: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for October, 2005All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 10.44 16.95 118.37 0.90 1.01 1,476.12 54029 Hancock County 12.64 11.16 112.89 0.77 0.81 1,109.45 39081 Jefferson County 28.21 18.77 265.49 1.87 1.39 1,996.25 

Totals: 51.28 46.88 496.75 3.53 3.20 4,581.82 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

OCTOBER 2005 (WEIRTON 10-05)

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:20:58: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for October, 2005

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.17 0.25 0.06 0.14 0.40 

54029 Hancock County 0.21 0.31 0.08 0.18 0.59 39081 Jefferson County 0.45 0.96 0.33 1.28 0.85 

Totals: 0.84 1.51 0.47 1.60 1.84 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONNOVEMBER 2005 (WEIRTON 11-05)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:32:12: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for November, 2005All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 10.50 17.08 117.20 0.90 1.01 1,476.12 54029 Hancock County 12.71 11.30 111.53 0.77 0.81 1,109.45 39081 Jefferson County 28.42 19.03 261.64 1.87 1.39 1,996.25 

Totals: 51.62 47.41 490.38 3.53 3.20 4,581.82 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

NOVEMBER 2005 (WEIRTON 11-05)

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:32:12: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for November, 2005

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.14 0.25 0.06 0.14 0.24 

54029 Hancock County 0.17 0.31 0.08 0.18 0.36 39081 Jefferson County 0.36 0.96 0.33 1.28 0.52 

Totals: 0.67 1.51 0.47 1.60 1.12 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONDECEMBER 2005 (WEIRTON 12-05)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:42:59: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for December, 2005All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 5.04 15.42 80.71 0.72 0.87 1,251.92 54029 Hancock County 4.43 9.19 60.58 0.54 0.66 813.50 39081 Jefferson County 13.55 12.92 150.20 1.07 0.91 1,260.34 

Totals: 23.02 37.53 291.48 2.32 2.44 3,325.77 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

DECEMBER 2005 (WEIRTON 12-05)

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:42:59: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for December, 2005

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.05 0.16 0.03 0.09 0.17 

54029 Hancock County 0.05 0.20 0.03 0.10 0.25 39081 Jefferson County 0.15 0.67 0.14 0.59 0.36 

Totals: 0.25 1.03 0.19 0.78 0.78 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONJANUARY 2008 (WEIRTON 01-08)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 13:46:34: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for January, 2008All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 3.95 12.39 66.48 0.62 0.16 1,302.27 54029 Hancock County 3.60 7.70 51.23 0.47 0.11 853.00 39081 Jefferson County 12.32 11.18 131.58 0.98 0.16 1,337.19 

Totals: 19.87 31.27 249.29 2.07 0.43 3,492.46 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

JANUARY 2008 (WEIRTON 01-08)

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 13:46:34: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for January, 2008

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.04 0.16 0.03 0.09 0.16 

54029 Hancock County 0.05 0.20 0.03 0.11 0.23 39081 Jefferson County 0.14 0.68 0.16 0.67 0.35 

Totals: 0.23 1.04 0.21 0.87 0.74 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONFEBRUARY 2008 (WEIRTON 02-08)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 13:57:14: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for February, 2008All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 3.95 12.38 66.57 0.62 0.16 1,302.27 54029 Hancock County 3.60 7.69 51.33 0.47 0.11 853.00 39081 Jefferson County 12.30 11.15 131.89 0.98 0.16 1,337.19 

Totals: 19.85 31.22 249.78 2.07 0.43 3,492.46 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

FEBRUARY 2008 (WEIRTON 02-08)

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 13:57:14: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for February, 2008

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.05 0.16 0.03 0.09 0.16 

54029 Hancock County 0.05 0.20 0.03 0.11 0.23 39081 Jefferson County 0.15 0.68 0.16 0.67 0.34 

Totals: 0.24 1.04 0.21 0.87 0.72 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONMARCH 2008 (WEIRTON 03-08)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:08:00: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for March, 2008All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 8.23 13.95 96.60 0.75 0.18 1,514.99 54029 Hancock County 10.15 9.75 93.64 0.64 0.14 1,135.80 39081 Jefferson County 25.99 16.98 228.58 1.74 0.25 2,139.07 

Totals: 44.37 40.68 418.82 3.13 0.56 4,789.86 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

MARCH 2008 (WEIRTON 03-08)

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:08:00: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for March, 2008

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.13 0.24 0.06 0.15 0.23 

54029 Hancock County 0.16 0.30 0.08 0.19 0.35 39081 Jefferson County 0.36 0.97 0.38 1.48 0.51 

Totals: 0.65 1.51 0.53 1.82 1.09 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONAPRIL 2008 (WEIRTON 04-08)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:18:40: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for April, 2008All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 8.18 13.83 97.50 0.75 0.18 1,514.99 54029 Hancock County 10.09 9.61 94.74 0.64 0.14 1,135.80 39081 Jefferson County 25.81 16.72 231.82 1.74 0.25 2,139.07 

Totals: 44.08 40.16 424.05 3.13 0.56 4,789.86 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

APRIL 2008 (WEIRTON 04-08)

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:18:40: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for April, 2008

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.15 0.24 0.06 0.15 0.36 

54029 Hancock County 0.20 0.30 0.08 0.19 0.53 39081 Jefferson County 0.45 0.97 0.38 1.48 0.78 

Totals: 0.80 1.51 0.53 1.82 1.67 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONMAY 2008 (WEIRTON 05-08)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:29:23: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for May, 2008All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 8.15 13.75 98.22 0.75 0.18 1,514.99 54029 Hancock County 10.04 9.51 95.63 0.64 0.14 1,135.80 39081 Jefferson County 25.67 16.52 234.44 1.74 0.25 2,139.07 

Totals: 43.86 39.78 428.29 3.13 0.56 4,789.86 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

MAY 2008 (WEIRTON 05-08)

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:29:23: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for May, 2008

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.09 0.24 0.06 0.15 0.53 

54029 Hancock County 0.12 0.30 0.08 0.19 0.78 39081 Jefferson County 0.28 0.97 0.38 1.48 1.16 

Totals: 0.49 1.51 0.53 1.82 2.47 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONJUNE 2008 (WEIRTON 06-08)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:40:44: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for June, 2008All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 16.62 16.28 141.45 1.01 0.21 1,868.19 54029 Hancock County 22.99 12.73 158.87 0.97 0.18 1,608.79 39081 Jefferson County 56.09 24.85 454.68 3.05 0.37 3,469.04 

Totals: 95.70 53.86 754.99 5.03 0.77 6,946.03 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

JUNE 2008 (WEIRTON 06-08)

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:40:44: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for June, 2008

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.20 0.33 0.10 0.20 0.71 

54029 Hancock County 0.28 0.41 0.14 0.26 1.04 39081 Jefferson County 0.69 1.83 0.79 2.77 1.55 

Totals: 1.17 2.57 1.03 3.23 3.31 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONJULY 2008 (WEIRTON 07-08)Date of Model Run: Nov 07 15:26:54: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for July, 2008All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 16.60 16.23 141.84 1.01 0.21 1,868.19 54029 Hancock County 22.96 12.67 159.38 0.97 0.18 1,608.79 39081 Jefferson County 55.99 24.73 456.55 3.05 0.37 3,469.04 

Totals: 95.55 53.63 757.77 5.03 0.77 6,946.03 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

JULY 2008 (WEIRTON 07-08)

Date of Model Run: Nov 07 15:26:54: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for July, 2008

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.21 0.33 0.10 0.20 0.84 

54029 Hancock County 0.30 0.41 0.14 0.26 1.23 39081 Jefferson County 0.73 1.83 0.79 2.77 1.83 

Totals: 1.24 2.57 1.03 3.23 3.90 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONAUGUST 2008 (WEIRTON 08-08)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:03:22: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for August, 2008All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 16.61 16.24 141.74 1.01 0.21 1,868.19 54029 Hancock County 22.97 12.69 159.24 0.97 0.18 1,608.79 39081 Jefferson County 56.02 24.76 456.05 3.05 0.37 3,469.04 

Totals: 95.59 53.69 757.03 5.03 0.77 6,946.03 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

AUGUST 2008 (WEIRTON 08-08)

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:03:22: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for August, 2008

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.21 0.33 0.10 0.20 0.81 

54029 Hancock County 0.29 0.41 0.14 0.26 1.19 39081 Jefferson County 0.72 1.83 0.79 2.77 1.77 

Totals: 1.22 2.57 1.03 3.23 3.76 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONSEPTEMBER 2008 (WEIRTON 09-08)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:14:32: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for September, 2008All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 8.15 13.89 98.79 0.77 0.18 1,534.91 54029 Hancock County 10.05 9.67 96.30 0.66 0.14 1,158.87 39081 Jefferson County 25.59 16.32 235.60 1.73 0.25 2,126.38 

Totals: 43.79 39.88 430.69 3.16 0.57 4,820.16 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

SEPTEMBER 2008 (WEIRTON 09-08)

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:14:32: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for September, 2008

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.10 0.24 0.06 0.15 0.61 

54029 Hancock County 0.13 0.30 0.08 0.19 0.90 39081 Jefferson County 0.30 0.97 0.38 1.48 1.34 

Totals: 0.53 1.51 0.53 1.82 2.86 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONOCTOBER 2008 (WEIRTON 10-08)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:25:22: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for October, 2008All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 8.19 13.98 97.97 0.77 0.18 1,534.91 54029 Hancock County 10.10 9.78 95.30 0.66 0.14 1,158.87 39081 Jefferson County 25.74 16.53 232.66 1.73 0.25 2,126.38 

Totals: 44.04 40.29 425.93 3.16 0.57 4,820.16 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

OCTOBER 2008 (WEIRTON 10-08)

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:25:22: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for October, 2008

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.16 0.24 0.06 0.15 0.42 

54029 Hancock County 0.21 0.30 0.08 0.19 0.62 39081 Jefferson County 0.48 0.97 0.38 1.48 0.92 

Totals: 0.85 1.51 0.53 1.82 1.97 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONNOVEMBER 2008 (WEIRTON 11-08)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:36:34: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for November, 2008All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 8.24 14.10 97.04 0.77 0.18 1,534.91 54029 Hancock County 10.16 9.92 94.17 0.66 0.14 1,158.87 39081 Jefferson County 25.93 16.79 229.33 1.73 0.25 2,126.38 

Totals: 44.33 40.81 420.54 3.16 0.57 4,820.16 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

NOVEMBER 2008 (WEIRTON 11-08)

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:36:34: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for November, 2008

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.13 0.24 0.06 0.15 0.26 

54029 Hancock County 0.17 0.30 0.08 0.19 0.38 39081 Jefferson County 0.38 0.97 0.38 1.48 0.56 

Totals: 0.69 1.51 0.53 1.82 1.20 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONDECEMBER 2008 (WEIRTON 12-08)Date of Model Run: Nov 07 15:29:03: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for December, 2008All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 3.94 12.37 66.61 0.62 0.16 1,302.27 54029 Hancock County 3.60 7.68 51.38 0.47 0.11 853.00 39081 Jefferson County 12.29 11.14 132.05 0.98 0.16 1,337.19 

Totals: 19.83 31.19 250.04 2.07 0.43 3,492.46 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

DECEMBER 2008 (WEIRTON 12-08)

Date of Model Run: Nov 07 15:29:03: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for December, 2008

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.05 0.16 0.03 0.09 0.18 

54029 Hancock County 0.05 0.20 0.03 0.11 0.26 39081 Jefferson County 0.15 0.68 0.16 0.67 0.39 

Totals: 0.25 1.04 0.21 0.87 0.83 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONJANUARY 2015 (WEIRTON 01-15)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 13:48:41: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for January, 2015All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 2.22 5.75 35.24 0.43 0.02 1,453.33 54029 Hancock County 2.37 4.07 34.75 0.33 0.01 962.47 39081 Jefferson County 9.56 6.56 108.39 0.78 0.02 1,534.97 

Totals: 14.16 16.38 178.38 1.54 0.05 3,950.76 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

JANUARY 2015 (WEIRTON 01-15)

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 13:48:41: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for January, 2015

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.04 0.18 0.03 0.03 0.11 

54029 Hancock County 0.05 0.22 0.03 0.04 0.17 39081 Jefferson County 0.16 0.76 0.19 0.54 0.20 

Totals: 0.25 1.16 0.25 0.62 0.48 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONFEBRUARY 2015 (WEIRTON 02-15)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 13:59:22: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for February, 2015All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 2.22 5.74 35.31 0.43 0.02 1,453.33 54029 Hancock County 2.37 4.06 34.83 0.33 0.01 962.47 39081 Jefferson County 9.55 6.54 108.67 0.78 0.02 1,534.97 

Totals: 14.14 16.35 178.80 1.54 0.05 3,950.76 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

FEBRUARY 2015 (WEIRTON 02-15)

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 13:59:22: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for February, 2015

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.04 0.18 0.03 0.03 0.11 

54029 Hancock County 0.05 0.22 0.03 0.04 0.16 39081 Jefferson County 0.17 0.76 0.19 0.54 0.20 

Totals: 0.26 1.16 0.25 0.62 0.47 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONMARCH 2015 (WEIRTON 03-15)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:10:08: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for March, 2015All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 4.08 7.15 57.27 0.52 0.02 1,687.48 54029 Hancock County 5.27 5.98 66.07 0.44 0.02 1,271.30 39081 Jefferson County 17.87 10.56 185.79 1.32 0.03 2,464.54 

Totals: 27.22 23.69 309.12 2.28 0.07 5,423.31 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

MARCH 2015 (WEIRTON 03-15)

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:10:08: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for March, 2015

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.12 0.26 0.07 0.06 0.17 

54029 Hancock County 0.16 0.33 0.09 0.08 0.25 39081 Jefferson County 0.40 1.09 0.47 1.35 0.30 

Totals: 0.68 1.68 0.62 1.49 0.71 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONAPRIL 2015 (WEIRTON 04-15)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:20:47: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for April, 2015All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 4.05 7.08 57.93 0.52 0.02 1,687.48 54029 Hancock County 5.24 5.87 66.91 0.44 0.02 1,271.30 39081 Jefferson County 17.75 10.38 188.54 1.32 0.03 2,464.54 

Totals: 27.05 23.33 313.38 2.28 0.07 5,423.31 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

APRIL 2015 (WEIRTON 04-15)

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:20:47: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for April, 2015

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.15 0.26 0.07 0.06 0.25 

54029 Hancock County 0.20 0.33 0.09 0.08 0.38 39081 Jefferson County 0.50 1.09 0.47 1.35 0.46 

Totals: 0.85 1.68 0.62 1.49 1.09 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONMAY 2015 (WEIRTON 05-15)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:31:38: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for May, 2015All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 4.03 7.02 58.47 0.52 0.02 1,687.48 54029 Hancock County 5.21 5.80 67.60 0.44 0.02 1,271.30 39081 Jefferson County 17.66 10.24 190.77 1.32 0.03 2,464.54 

Totals: 26.91 23.06 316.84 2.28 0.07 5,423.31 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

MAY 2015 (WEIRTON 05-15)

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:31:38: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for May, 2015

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.09 0.26 0.07 0.06 0.37 

54029 Hancock County 0.12 0.33 0.09 0.08 0.56 39081 Jefferson County 0.31 1.09 0.47 1.35 0.68 

Totals: 0.52 1.68 0.62 1.49 1.61 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONJUNE 2015 (WEIRTON 06-15)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:43:00: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for June, 2015All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 8.37 9.41 92.67 0.68 0.03 2,073.94 54029 Hancock County 11.80 8.95 117.80 0.63 0.03 1,784.67 39081 Jefferson County 37.32 16.68 377.42 2.30 0.05 3,992.38 

Totals: 57.49 35.04 587.90 3.61 0.11 7,850.99 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

JUNE 2015 (WEIRTON 06-15)

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:43:00: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for June, 2015

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.20 0.36 0.11 0.08 0.50 

54029 Hancock County 0.28 0.45 0.15 0.11 0.75 39081 Jefferson County 0.76 2.05 0.95 2.62 0.91 

Totals: 1.24 2.86 1.21 2.81 2.16 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONJULY 2015 (WEIRTON 07-15)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:54:17: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for July, 2015All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 8.36 9.37 92.97 0.68 0.03 2,073.94 54029 Hancock County 11.79 8.90 118.20 0.63 0.03 1,784.67 39081 Jefferson County 37.26 16.59 379.01 2.30 0.05 3,992.38 

Totals: 57.41 34.87 590.18 3.61 0.11 7,850.99 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

JULY 2015 (WEIRTON 07-15)

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:54:17: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for July, 2015

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.21 0.36 0.11 0.08 0.59 

54029 Hancock County 0.30 0.45 0.15 0.11 0.89 39081 Jefferson County 0.81 2.05 0.95 2.62 1.07 

Totals: 1.32 2.86 1.21 2.81 2.54 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONAUGUST 2015 (WEIRTON 08-15)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:05:36: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for August, 2015All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 8.36 9.38 92.89 0.68 0.03 2,073.94 54029 Hancock County 11.79 8.92 118.09 0.63 0.03 1,784.67 39081 Jefferson County 37.28 16.61 378.59 2.30 0.05 3,992.38 

Totals: 57.43 34.91 589.57 3.61 0.11 7,850.99 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

AUGUST 2015 (WEIRTON 08-15)

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:05:36: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for August, 2015

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.21 0.36 0.11 0.08 0.57 

54029 Hancock County 0.29 0.45 0.15 0.11 0.86 39081 Jefferson County 0.79 2.05 0.95 2.62 1.03 

Totals: 1.30 2.86 1.21 2.81 2.46 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONSEPTEMBER 2015 (WEIRTON 09-15)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:16:40: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for September, 2015All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 4.04 7.11 58.89 0.53 0.02 1,710.61 54029 Hancock County 5.22 5.90 68.12 0.45 0.02 1,298.09 39081 Jefferson County 17.61 10.11 191.78 1.32 0.03 2,449.81 

Totals: 26.87 23.12 318.78 2.30 0.07 5,458.51 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

SEPTEMBER 2015 (WEIRTON 09-15)

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:16:40: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for September, 2015

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.10 0.26 0.07 0.06 0.43 

54029 Hancock County 0.13 0.33 0.09 0.08 0.65 39081 Jefferson County 0.34 1.09 0.46 1.35 0.78 

Totals: 0.57 1.68 0.62 1.49 1.87 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONOCTOBER 2015 (WEIRTON 10-15)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:27:38: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for October, 2015All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 4.06 7.17 58.28 0.53 0.02 1,710.61 54029 Hancock County 5.25 5.98 67.34 0.45 0.02 1,298.09 39081 Jefferson County 17.71 10.25 189.27 1.32 0.03 2,449.81 

Totals: 27.02 23.41 314.89 2.30 0.07 5,458.51 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

OCTOBER 2015 (WEIRTON 10-15)

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:27:38: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for October, 2015

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.16 0.26 0.07 0.06 0.30 

54029 Hancock County 0.21 0.33 0.09 0.08 0.45 39081 Jefferson County 0.53 1.09 0.46 1.35 0.54 

Totals: 0.90 1.68 0.62 1.49 1.29 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONNOVEMBER 2015 (WEIRTON 11-15)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:38:41: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for November, 2015All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 4.09 7.25 57.59 0.53 0.02 1,710.61 54029 Hancock County 5.28 6.08 66.47 0.45 0.02 1,298.09 39081 Jefferson County 17.83 10.43 186.43 1.32 0.03 2,449.81 

Totals: 27.20 23.77 310.49 2.30 0.07 5,458.51 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

NOVEMBER 2015 (WEIRTON 11-15)

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:38:41: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for November, 2015

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.13 0.26 0.07 0.06 0.18 

54029 Hancock County 0.17 0.33 0.09 0.08 0.27 39081 Jefferson County 0.42 1.09 0.46 1.35 0.33 

Totals: 0.73 1.68 0.62 1.49 0.78 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONDECEMBER 2015 (WEIRTON 12-15)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:49:31: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for December, 2015All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 2.22 5.74 35.34 0.43 0.02 1,453.33 54029 Hancock County 2.37 4.06 34.87 0.33 0.01 962.47 39081 Jefferson County 9.54 6.53 108.82 0.78 0.02 1,534.97 

Totals: 14.13 16.33 179.02 1.54 0.05 3,950.76 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

DECEMBER 2015 (WEIRTON 12-15)

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:49:31: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for December, 2015

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.04 0.18 0.03 0.03 0.13 

54029 Hancock County 0.05 0.22 0.03 0.04 0.19 39081 Jefferson County 0.17 0.76 0.19 0.54 0.23 

Totals: 0.26 1.16 0.25 0.62 0.55 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONJANUARY 2025 (WEIRTON 01-25)Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:16:27: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for January, 2025All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 1.99 3.68 32.23 0.26 0.02 1,724.31 54029 Hancock County 2.20 2.54 35.23 0.19 0.01 1,143.55 39081 Jefferson County 8.32 4.57 117.50 0.55 0.02 1,825.77 

Totals: 12.50 10.78 184.96 1.00 0.05 4,693.64 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

JANUARY 2025 (WEIRTON 01-25)

Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:16:27: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for January, 2025

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.04 0.21 0.03 0.03 0.05 

54029 Hancock County 0.05 0.26 0.04 0.04 0.08 39081 Jefferson County 0.18 0.89 0.20 0.55 0.08 

Totals: 0.27 1.35 0.27 0.62 0.20 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONFEBRUARY 2025 (WEIRTON 02-25)Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:18:39: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for February, 2025All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 1.99 3.67 32.30 0.26 0.02 1,724.31 54029 Hancock County 2.20 2.53 35.32 0.19 0.01 1,143.55 39081 Jefferson County 8.30 4.55 117.82 0.55 0.02 1,825.77 

Totals: 12.49 10.75 185.43 1.00 0.05 4,693.64 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

FEBRUARY 2025 (WEIRTON 02-25)

Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:18:39: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for February, 2025

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.04 0.21 0.03 0.03 0.05 

54029 Hancock County 0.05 0.26 0.04 0.04 0.07 39081 Jefferson County 0.19 0.89 0.20 0.55 0.08 

Totals: 0.28 1.35 0.27 0.62 0.20 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

MARCH 2025 (WEIRTON 03-25)

Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:20:55: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for March, 2025

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.13 0.31 0.07 0.04 0.08 

54029 Hancock County 0.18 0.39 0.10 0.05 0.11 39081 Jefferson County 0.44 1.25 0.51 1.37 0.11 

Totals: 0.74 1.95 0.68 1.47 0.30 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONMARCH 2025 (WEIRTON 03-25)Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:20:55: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for March, 2025All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 2.50 4.75 53.67 0.30 0.02 1,991.17 54029 Hancock County 3.05 4.08 65.50 0.25 0.02 1,492.74 39081 Jefferson County 12.18 7.25 195.92 0.86 0.03 2,907.12 

Totals: 17.74 16.08 315.10 1.41 0.08 6,391.03 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONAPRIL 2025 (WEIRTON 04-25)Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:23:10: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for April, 2025All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 2.48 4.70 54.36 0.30 0.02 1,991.17 54029 Hancock County 3.03 4.00 66.39 0.25 0.02 1,492.74 39081 Jefferson County 12.07 7.09 198.93 0.86 0.03 2,907.12 

Totals: 17.58 15.79 319.69 1.41 0.08 6,391.03 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

APRIL 2025 (WEIRTON 04-25)

Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:23:10: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for April, 2025

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.16 0.31 0.07 0.04 0.11 

54029 Hancock County 0.21 0.39 0.10 0.05 0.17 39081 Jefferson County 0.55 1.25 0.51 1.37 0.17 

Totals: 0.92 1.95 0.68 1.47 0.46 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONMAY 2025 (WEIRTON 05-25)Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:25:27: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for May, 2025All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 2.47 4.66 54.92 0.30 0.02 1,991.17 54029 Hancock County 3.00 3.95 67.11 0.25 0.02 1,492.74 39081 Jefferson County 11.99 6.96 201.37 0.86 0.03 2,907.12 

Totals: 17.46 15.58 323.40 1.41 0.08 6,391.03 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

MAY 2025 (WEIRTON 05-25)

Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:25:27: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for May, 2025

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.09 0.31 0.07 0.04 0.17 

54029 Hancock County 0.13 0.39 0.10 0.05 0.26 39081 Jefferson County 0.34 1.25 0.51 1.37 0.26 

Totals: 0.57 1.95 0.68 1.47 0.69 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONJUNE 2025 (WEIRTON 06-25)Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:27:42: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for June, 2025All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 4.42 6.61 87.54 0.39 0.03 2,428.50 54029 Hancock County 5.90 6.59 114.67 0.34 0.03 2,069.02 39081 Jefferson County 23.82 11.75 397.00 1.49 0.06 4,670.23 

Totals: 34.14 24.95 599.21 2.23 0.12 9,167.74 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

JUNE 2025 (WEIRTON 06-25)

Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:27:42: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for June, 2025

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.21 0.42 0.12 0.05 0.23 

54029 Hancock County 0.30 0.53 0.17 0.07 0.34 39081 Jefferson County 0.83 2.35 1.04 2.66 0.35 

Totals: 1.34 3.29 1.33 2.78 0.92 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONJULY 2025 (WEIRTON 07-25)Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:30:01: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for July, 2025All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 4.41 6.59 87.84 0.39 0.03 2,428.50 54029 Hancock County 5.89 6.55 115.07 0.34 0.03 2,069.02 39081 Jefferson County 23.76 11.67 398.72 1.49 0.06 4,670.23 

Totals: 34.06 24.81 601.63 2.23 0.12 9,167.74 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

JULY 2025 (WEIRTON 07-25)

Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:30:01: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for July, 2025

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.22 0.42 0.12 0.05 0.27 

54029 Hancock County 0.32 0.53 0.17 0.07 0.40 39081 Jefferson County 0.89 2.35 1.04 2.66 0.41 

Totals: 1.42 3.29 1.33 2.78 1.08 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONAUGUST 2025 (WEIRTON 08-25)Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:32:18: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for August, 2025All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 4.41 6.60 87.76 0.39 0.03 2,428.50 54029 Hancock County 5.89 6.56 114.96 0.34 0.03 2,069.02 39081 Jefferson County 23.78 11.69 398.27 1.49 0.06 4,670.23 

Totals: 34.08 24.85 600.99 2.23 0.12 9,167.74 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

AUGUST 2025 (WEIRTON 08-25)

Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:32:18: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for August, 2025

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.22 0.42 0.12 0.05 0.26 

54029 Hancock County 0.31 0.53 0.17 0.07 0.39 39081 Jefferson County 0.87 2.35 1.04 2.66 0.39 

Totals: 1.40 3.29 1.33 2.78 1.04 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

SEPTEMBER 2025 (WEIRTON 09-25)

Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:34:34: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for September, 2025

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.10 0.31 0.07 0.04 0.20 

54029 Hancock County 0.14 0.39 0.10 0.05 0.30 39081 Jefferson County 0.37 1.25 0.51 1.37 0.30 

Totals: 0.62 1.95 0.68 1.47 0.79 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONSEPTEMBER 2025 (WEIRTON 09-25)Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:34:34: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for September, 2025All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 2.47 4.70 55.31 0.31 0.02 2,018.87 54029 Hancock County 3.01 3.99 67.60 0.25 0.02 1,524.81 39081 Jefferson County 11.94 6.87 202.51 0.85 0.03 2,889.48 

Totals: 17.42 15.56 325.41 1.41 0.08 6,433.16 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONOCTOBER 2025 (WEIRTON 10-25)Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:36:49: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for October, 2025All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 2.49 4.74 54.68 0.31 0.02 2,018.87 54029 Hancock County 3.03 4.05 66.78 0.25 0.02 1,524.81 39081 Jefferson County 12.03 7.00 199.77 0.85 0.03 2,889.48 

Totals: 17.56 15.79 321.23 1.41 0.08 6,433.16 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

OCTOBER 2025 (WEIRTON 10-25)

Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:36:49: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for October, 2025

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.17 0.31 0.07 0.04 0.14 

54029 Hancock County 0.23 0.39 0.10 0.05 0.20 39081 Jefferson County 0.59 1.25 0.51 1.37 0.21 

Totals: 0.98 1.95 0.68 1.47 0.55 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONNOVEMBER 2025 (WEIRTON 11-25)Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:39:01: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for November, 2025All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 2.51 4.79 53.97 0.31 0.02 2,018.87 54029 Hancock County 3.06 4.12 65.87 0.25 0.02 1,524.81 39081 Jefferson County 12.14 7.17 196.66 0.85 0.03 2,889.48 

Totals: 17.72 16.09 316.50 1.41 0.08 6,433.16 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

NOVEMBER 2025 (WEIRTON 11-25)

Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:39:01: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for November, 2025

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.13 0.31 0.07 0.04 0.08 

54029 Hancock County 0.19 0.39 0.10 0.05 0.12 39081 Jefferson County 0.47 1.25 0.51 1.37 0.13 

Totals: 0.79 1.95 0.68 1.47 0.33 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTONDECEMBER 2025 (WEIRTON 12-25)Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:41:10: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for December, 2025All Fuels 

County

Exhaust 

VOC

Exhaust 

NOx

Exhaust 

CO

Exhaust 

PM25

Exhaust 

SO2

Exhaust 

CO2

FIPS 

54009 Brooke County 1.99 3.67 32.34 0.26 0.02 1,724.31 54029 Hancock County 2.19 2.53 35.36 0.19 0.01 1,143.55 39081 Jefferson County 8.30 4.54 117.98 0.55 0.02 1,825.77 

Totals: 12.48 10.74 185.68 1.00 0.05 4,693.64 

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
WEIRTON

DECEMBER 2025 (WEIRTON 12-25)

Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:41:10: 2011 

Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

Total for December, 2025

All Fuels 

County

Vapor 

Displacement 

VOC

Spillage 

FIPS VOC

Hot Soak 

VOC

Running 

Loss VOC

Tank 

Permeation 

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.04 0.21 0.03 0.03 0.06 

54029 Hancock County 0.05 0.26 0.04 0.04 0.09 39081 Jefferson County 0.19 0.89 0.20 0.55 0.09 

Totals: 0.29 1.35 0.27 0.62 0.23 Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan 
Appendix E

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 376
This page left intentionally blank

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 377
Public Notice 

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency 

Redesignation and Maintenance Plan for the Ohio Portion of the 

Steubenville-Weirton, WV-OH 

24- Hour PM2.5 Nonattainment Area 

Jefferson County, Ohio 

Notice is hereby given that the Director of the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency 

(Ohio EPA) is requesting that the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. 

EPA) revise the current air quality designation for the Ohio portion (Jefferson County) of 

the Steubenville-Weirton, WV-OH area, to attainment with respect to the 2006 24-Hour 

PM2.5 national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). This redesignation should not be 

confused with Ohio EPA’s recent request to U.S. EPA for redesignation of the 1997 

Annual PM2.5 standards for which a separate hearing was held recently. Air quality 

monitoring data collected between 2008 and 2010 in the region demonstrate attainment 

of the NAAQS and there is evidence that the improved air quality is due to permanent, 

enforceable emission reductions. In addition, existing requirements are sufficient to 

maintain the 2006 24-Hour PM2.5 standard in this area at least ten years into the future. 

Computer models show that existing state and federal emission reduction requirements 

are sufficient to attain and maintain the NAAQS in the Steubenville-Weirton area. 

Therefore, Ohio EPA proposes to utilize existing emission inventory information and 

projections of future emissions as the demonstration of the ability to maintain the 

NAAQS in the Steubenville-Weirton area in the future. 

The Steubenville-Weirton area is currently designated as nonattainment for the 2006 

24-Hour PM2.5 standard. As part of an acceptable maintenance plan, Ohio EPA has 

developed, as required, a contingency plan to provide for additional emission reductions 

if a violation of the NAAQS is monitored after the area has been redesignated. 

The State of Ohio proposes to: 

1. Request the U.S. EPA redesignate the Ohio portion of the Steubenville-Weirton, 

WV-OH area to attainment with respect to the 2006 24-Hour PM2.5 NAAQS and 

revise the maintenance plan. This request will document that existing 

enforceable control measures are responsible for the observed improvement in 

air quality. 

2. Designate existing controls as sufficient to maintain the NAAQS into the future. 

3. Commit to the proposed contingency plan. 

These actions must be noticed to allow public comment and to satisfy USEPA 

requirements for public involvement in SIP-related activities. This notice addresses Ohio 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 378
EPA’s reliance on the emission projections as evidence of attainment and maintenance 

and the commitment to institute contingency measures if ambient exceedances or 

violations trigger the contingency plan requirements. Written comments will be received 

on or before May 16, 2012 at the following address: 

E-mail: erica.fetty@epa.state.oh.us

Mailing address: Erica Fetty 

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, DAPC 

Lazarus Government Center 

P.O. Box 1049 

Columbus, Ohio 43216-1049 

Phone: (614) 644-2310 

Pursuant to Section 119.03 of the Ohio Revised Code, a public hearing on this 

redesignation request will be conducted as follows: May 16, 2012 at 3:00PM

Steubenville Library – Schiappa Branch, 4141 Mall Drive, Steubenville, OH 43952. 

All interested persons are entitled to attend or be represented at the hearing and give 

written or oral comments on these changes. All oral comments presented at the 

hearing, and all written statements submitted at the hearing or to the above address by 

the close of business on May 16, 2012 will be considered by Ohio EPA prior to final 

action on this redesignation. Written statements submitted after May 16, 2012 may be 

considered as time and circumstances permit, but will not be part of the official record of 

the hearing. 

This redesignation and maintenance request is available on Ohio EPA’s web page for 

electronic downloading at: http://www.epa.ohio.gov/dapc/SIP/annual.aspx. Questions 

regarding accessing the web site should be directed to Arunee Niamlarb at 614-728-

1342; other questions or comments about this document should be directed to Erica 

Fetty at (614) 644-2310, Erica.Fetty@epa.state.oh.us or mailed to Erica Fetty at the 

above address. 

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 379
Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 380
Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 381
Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 382
BEFORE THE OHIO EPA

- - -

IN RE: :

:

Redesignation 24-hour Particulate :

Matter 2.5, Steubenville Area :

- - -

Audiotaped public hearing before 

Moderator Darla Peele, taken at the Steubenville 

Library - Sciappa Branch, 4141 Mall Drive, 

Steubenville, Ohio, at 3:00 p.m. on May 16, 2012.

- - -

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 383
P-R-O-C-E-E-D-I-N-G-S

- - -

MODERATOR PEELE: This is the 

introduction for the Ohio Environmental 

Protection Agency Redesignation 24-hour 

Particulate Matter 2.5 for the Steubenville area 

hearing held 5-16-12.

My name's Darla Peele. I'm a public 

information officer for Ohio EPA. I will be 

presiding over today's public hearing. Thank you 

for taking the time to attend this hearing before 

Ohio EPA.

The purpose of the hearing today is to 

obtain comments from any interested person today 

regarding Ohio EPA's proposed action. 

The State of Ohio plans to ask U.S. EPA 

to revise the current air quality designation for 

Ohio, the Ohio portion of Jefferson County, of 

the Steubenville-Weirton, West Virginia-Ohio area 

to attainment with respect to 2006 24-hour PM2.5 

national ambient air quality standard. This 

redesignation should not be confused with Ohio 

EPA's recent request to U.S. EPA for 

redesignation of the 1997 annual PM2.5 standards 

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 384
for which a separate hearing was held recently.

Air quality monitoring data from 2008 

through 2010 in the region demonstrated 

attainment of the national ambient air quality 

standard, and there is evidence that the improved 

air quality is due to permanent enforceable 

emission reductions. 

In addition, existing requirements were 

sufficient to maintain the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 

standard in this area for at least ten years into 

the future.

Computer models show that existing state 

and federal emission reduction requirements are 

sufficient to attain and maintain the national 

ambient air quality standard in the 

Steubenville-Weirton area. Therefore, Ohio EPA 

proposes to utilize the existing emission 

inventory information and projections of future 

emissions as a demonstration of the ability to 

maintain the national ambient air quality 

standard in the Steubenville-Weirton area.

Comments can be submitted until the 

close of business today, May 16, 2012. You may 

e-mail comments to erika.fetty@epa.ohio.gov.

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 385
All interested persons are entitled to 

attend or be represented and present oral and/or 

written comments concerning the proposed action. 

All written and oral comments received as a part 

of the official record will be considered by the 

director of Ohio EPA before a final decision is 

made.

Statements submitted after the comment 

period closes may be considered as time and 

circumstances permit but will not be a part of 

the official record of the hearing.

If you wish to present oral testimony at 

the hearing today and have not already signed the 

registration sheet, please do so at this time. 

The sheet is available at the registration table. 

Persons will be called in the order in which they 

have registered.

There is no cross-examination of the 

speakers or representatives of Ohio EPA in 

hearings such as this. Ohio EPA hearings provide 

citizens the opportunity to submit comments on 

the official record. Therefore, we will not be 

able to answer questions during the hearing. 

However, Ohio EPA staff may ask clarifying 

4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 386
questions of the person testifying to ensure the 

record is as complete and accurate as possible.

Seeing that there is no one who wishes 

to provide testimony, we will go off record. It 

is 3:05 p.m. on 5-16-12.

(Break taken until 3:30 p.m.)

MODERATOR PEELE: Back on record.

Seeing no further requests for 

testimony, I will remind you that written 

comments can be submitted through 5 p.m. on May 

16, 2012. 

Thank you for attending. No one did 

attend. The time is now 3:30 p.m., and this 

hearing is adjourned.

* * *

5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 387
C E R T I F I C A T E

- - -

STATE OF OHIO :

 SS:

COUNTY OF FRANKLIN :

I, Jennifer L. Parish, Registered 

Professional Reporter, do hereby certify that the 

foregoing is a true, correct, and complete 

transcription of the above-mentioned cassette 

tape before the Ohio Environmental Protection 

Agency to the best of my ability.

DATED this 22nd day of May, 2012.

_________________________

JENNIFER L. PARISH, RPR

NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF OHIO

My Commission Expires: November 23, 2014.

6

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

Weirton, WV 2006 PM2.5 Redesignation Request & Maintenance Plan Page H - 388