alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §634d. Staff and powers of Office of Advocacy

In carrying out the provisions of sections 634a to 634g of this title, the Chief Counsel for Advocacy may—

(1) employ and fix the compensation of such additional staff personnel as is deemed necessary, without regard to the provisions of title 5, governing appointments in the competitive service, and without regard to chapter 51, and subchapter III of chapter 53 of such title relating to classification and General Schedule pay rates but at rates not in excess of the lowest rate for GS–15 of the General Schedule: Provided, however, That not more than 14 staff personnel at any one time may be employed and compensated at a rate not in excess of GS–15, step 10, of the General Schedule;

(2) procure temporary and intermittent services to the same extent as is authorized by section 3109 of title 5;

(3) consult with experts and authorities in the fields of small business investment, venture capital, investment and commercial banking and other comparable financial institutions involved in the financing of business, and with individuals with regulatory, legal, economic, or financial expertise, including members of the academic community, and individuals who generally represent the public interest;

(4) utilize the services of the National Advisory Council established pursuant to the provisions of section 637(b)(13) of this title and in accordance with the provisions of such statute, also appoint such other advisory boards or committees as is reasonably appropriate and necessary to carry out the provisions of sections 634a to 634g of this title; and

(5) hold hearings and sit and act at such times and places as he may deem advisable.

(Pub. L. 94–305, title II, §204, June 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 669; Pub. L. 96–302, title IV, §402, July 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 850; Pub. L. 103–403, title VI, §§605(b), 610, Oct. 22, 1994, 108 Stat. 4203, 4204.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The General Schedule, referred to in par. (1), is set out under section 5332 of Title 5.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Small Business Act which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–403, §§605(b), 610(1), in introductory provisions substituted "provisions of sections 634a to 634g of this title, the Chief" for "provisions of section 634b of this title, after consultation with and subject to the approval of the Administrator, the Chief".

Par. (1). Pub. L. 103–403, §610(2), substituted "14" for "ten" before "staff personnel".

1980—Par. (1). Pub. L. 96–302 authorized employment at any one time of ten staff personnel at rate of compensation not in excess of GS–15, step 10, of the General Schedule.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–302 effective Oct. 1, 1980, see section 507 of Pub. L. 96–302, set out as a note under section 631 of this title.
###### Editorial Note on Part 0

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

#### § 0.113 Redelegation of authority.

The Director, U.S. Marshals Service, is authorized to redelegate to any of his subordinates any of the powers and functions vested in him by this subpart, except that the authority to approve “other necessary expenditures in the line of duty” of U.S. Marshals and Deputy U.S. Marshals may not be delegated below the Assistant Director level.

[Order No. 905-80, 45 FR 52145, Aug. 6, 1980]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 2 3 , 2015 

# Order

Clerk December 2 3 , 2015

15 2816(4)

STEVEN M. GURSTEN

, Plaintiff,

v SC: 15 2816

AGC: 0935

- 14

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice

, defendant’s motion to extend the time for filings its

answer is GRANTED

. The answer will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or

before February 3, 2016.
#### MICHAEL ROYOS CRUZ, Appellee v. MANUEL C. MESA, Appellant

Civil No. 8-A

District Court of Guam Appellate Division

September 15, 1958

*31
      *Counsel for Appellee:*Robert E. Duffy

*Counsel for Appellant:*Joaquin C. Arriola

Before FURBER, *Chief Justice,*and TOOMIN, *Associate Justice,*High Court of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands and SHRIVER, *United States Judge,*District Court of Guam

PER CURIAM

OPINION

The appellee, plaintiff below, brought this action against the appellant, defendant below, for specific performance of a contract to sell land. At the time the contract was made the land was part of a larger lot. The appellee caused a survey to be made of the land which was the subject of sale which survey included a right-of-way not included in the original sale.

The testimony showed that the survey was made after the appellant had pointed out the boundaries, including the right-of-way and that the appellant signed the survey map.

We agree that the appellee was entitled to specific performance of the contract. The appellant filed a cross-complaint which was not ruled upon by the trial court as should have been done. The findings of fact, conclusions of law and judgment make it clear that the trial court had held against the allegations made in the cross-complaint and it would serve no useful purpose to remand solely for the purpose of dismissing it.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Crenshaw, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 794]

Appeal, by permission of a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Stephen R. Sirkin, A.J.), entered December 31, 2003. The order denied defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate a judgment convicting defendant of robbery in the first degree.

*1316It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from an order denying his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate a judgment convicting him of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15 [4]), defendant contends that Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying the motion without conducting a hearing. We reject that contention. Pursuant to CPL 440.30 (4) (d), the court has discretion to deny a CPL 440.10 motion where, as here, “the allegations essential to support the motion are contradicted by the record and there is no reasonable possibility that they are true” *(People v Bonilla,*6 AD3d 1059, 1061 [2004]; *cf. People v Staton,*224 AD2d 984 [1996]). We have examined defendant’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are lacking in merit. Present— Hurlbutt, A.PJ., Scudder, Gorski, Centra and Green, JJ.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-18-00003-CR

Christine RUSSELL,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11-0695-CR

Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED October 17, 2018.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
### **CHAPTER 15A—GREAT LAKES FISHERIES**

Sec.
931.
Definitions.
932.
Commissioners; appointment, number, and compensation; term of office; vacancy.
933.
Advisory Committee.
934.
Repealed.
935.
Acquisition of real property; construction and operation of lamprey control works; entry into agreements for construction and operation of works.
936.
Secretary of the Interior; authority to transfer lamprey control projects and act on behalf of United States Section.
937.
United States Section as agency of United States.
938.
Notice of proposals.
939.
Transmission of recommendations.
939a.
Cooperation with other agencies.
939b.
State laws and regulations.
939c.
Authorization of appropriations.
UNITED STATES
                   SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                        Washington, D.C. 20549



                                 FORM 8-K


                             CURRENT REPORT
   Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


             Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):
                              August 1, 2001


                      HOMELAND HOLDING CORPORATION
          (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


         Delaware                     33-48862               73-1311075
(State or other jurisdiction        (Commission	           (IRS Employer
   of incorporation)                File Number)          Identification No.)


	2601 N.W. Expressway
	Oklahoma City, OK	                                       73112
(Address of principal executive offices)                    (Zip Code)

                             (405) 879-6600
         (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)



Item 3.  Bankruptcy or Receivership.

         On August 1, 2001, Homeland Holding Corporation ("Holding") and its
wholly-owned subsidiary Homeland Stores, Inc. ("Homeland") filed voluntary
petitions under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code ("Bankruptcy
Code") with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of
Oklahoma ("Bankruptcy Court").  The cases filed by Holding and Homeland are In
re Homeland Holding Corporation, Debtor, Case No. 01-17869TS, and In re
Homeland Stores, Inc., Debtor, Case No. 01-17870TS, respectively.

         Holding and Homeland continue in possession of their properties and
the management of their businesses as debtors-in-possessions pursuant to Section
1107 and Section 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code.   Holding and Homeland continue
to be managed by their respective directors and officers, subject in each case
to the supervision of the Bankruptcy Court.

         Holding and Homeland issued a press release announcing the filing, a
copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated herein by
reference.

Item 5.  Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosure.

         Under the Indenture dated as of August 2, 1996 ("Indenture"),
Homeland was required to make an interest payment on its 10% Senior
Subordinated Notes Due 2003 ("Notes") of approximately $ 3,000,000.00
on August 1, 2001.  Homeland failed to make the required interest payment on
August 1, 2001, which constitutes a Default under the Indenture.

Item 7.   Financial Statements and Exhibits.

              (c)           Exhibits

		Exhibit 99.1    Press release dated August 1, 2001.

                              SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                                Homeland Holding Corporation


                                By:
                                David B. Clark, President/CEO

Date: August 6, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                         670,974
<SECURITIES>                                 4,012,813
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,988,467
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,000
<INVENTORY>                                  5,396,840
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,259,676
<PP&E>                                      79,519,800
<DEPRECIATION>                              57,029,496
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              49,568,898
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,373,158
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,219,195
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,033,598
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                49,568,898
<SALES>                                    137,744,137
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           138,713,382
<CGS>                                       63,548,396
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               63,548,396
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                10,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,319,835
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,832,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,487,835
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,487,835
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29
        

</TABLE>
#### § 2.4 Same: Youth offenders and juvenile delinquents.

Committed youth offenders and juvenile delinquents may be released on parole at any time in the discretion of the Commission.

(18 U.S.C. 5017(a) and 5041)

[45 FR 44925, July 2, 1980]
###### Editorial Note on Part 12

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 12 appear at 69 FR 32438, June 10, 2004.

#### § 12.64 Annual review and update of Owner's Dam Safety Program.

The Owner's Dam Safety Program, and the implementation thereof, shall be reviewed at least once annually by the licensee's dam safety staff and discussed with senior management of the Owner's organization. The licensee shall submit the results of the annual review, including findings, analysis, corrective measures, and/or revisions to the Owner's Dam Safety Program, to the Regional Engineer.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

PHILLIP T. SENTERS, ) DOC #165399, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1447 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed January 30, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge. Phillip T. Senters, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, SLEET, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
§ 12.22 Material contents of registration statement. The registration statement shall include the following, all of which shall be regarded as material for the purposes of the act: ( a ) The registrant's name, principal business address, and all other business addresses in the United States or elsewhere, and all residence addresses.
( b ) The registrant's citizenship status and how such status was acquired.
( c ) A detailed statement setting forth the nature of the registrant's knowledge of the espionage, counterespionage, or sabotage service or tactics of a foreign government or foreign political party, and the manner in which, place where, and date when such knowledge was obtained.
( d ) A detailed statement as to any instruction or training received by the registrant in the espionage, counterespionage, or sabotage service or tactics of a foreign government or foreign political party, including a description of the type of instruction or training received, a description of any courses taken, the dates when such courses commenced and when they ceased, and the name and official title of the instructor or instructors under whose supervision the courses were received as well as the name and location of schools and other institutions attended, the dates of such attendance, and the names of the directors of the schools and institutions attended.
( e ) A detailed statement describing any assignment received in the espionage, counterespionage, or sabotage service or tactics of a foreign government or foreign political party, including the type of assignment, the date when each assignment began, the date of completion of each assignment, name and title of the person or persons under whose supervision the assignment was executed, and a complete description of the nature of the assignment and the execution thereof.
( f ) A detailed statement of any relationship which may exist at the time of registration, other than through employment, between the registrant and any foreign government or foreign political party.
( g ) Such other statements, information, or documents pertinent to the purposes and objectives of the act as the Attorney General, having due regard for the national security and the public interest, may require by this part or amendments thereto.
#### Haggard Bros. *v.*W. *&*T. Smith.

*Practice—affidamit with declaration so as to require affidavit of merits to pleas.*The affidavit required under section 36 of the Practice act of 1872 to be filed with the declaration, to entitle the plaintiffs to judgment by default unless the defendant will file an affidavit that he has a defense, etc., with his pleas, may properly be made by one of several plaintiffs, and will be sufficient if, in connection with the declaration, it shows the nature of the cause of action.

*508Appeal from the Circuit Court of McLean county; the Hon. Thomas F. Tipton, Judge; presiding.

This was an action of assumpsit, by William and Thomas Smith, partners, against David D. Haggard and John W. Haggard, partners under the firm name of Haggard Bros., and James Grover, upon a promissory note. Grover was not served with process. William Smith,'one of the plaintiffs, made the following affidavit, which was filed with plaintiffs’ declaration:

“William Smith, being sworn according to law, on oath says, that he is one of the plaintiffs in the above entitled cause now pending and undetermined in the circuit court within and for the county of McLean, and State of Illinois; that said defendants in said cause are justly indebted to the plaintiffs, on and by virtue of the promissory note sued on in said cause, to the amount of $696.50; that said amount was, before the commencement of said suit, and is, due to plaintiffs on said note from the defendants after allowing to the '• defendants all their just credits, deductions and set-offs.

William Smith.”

The defendants, Haggard Bros., moved to strike this affidavit from the files, because it did not show the nature of the plaintiffs’ demand, and because it was an affidavit of only one of the plaintiffs. The court overruled the motion and defendants excepted. Haggard Bros, then filed the plea of the general issue, which the court struck from the files on plaintiffs’ motion, and defendants excepted. The court then rendered judgment by *nil dieit,*and assessed plaintiff’s damages at $717.75, and rendered final judgment for that sum and costs, from which judgment Haggard Bros, appealed.

Mr. W. M. Hatch, for the appellants.

Messrs. Weldon *&*Benjamin, for the appellees.

*509Mr. Justice McAllister

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was assumpsit, brought in January, 1873, upon a promissory note. One of the plaintiffs made .an affidavit under the 36th section of the Practice act of 1872, which was filed with the declaration. The defendant served failing to file any affidavit of merits, judgment by default was entered and the damages assessed by the court.

The points made are frivolous. The affidavit was properly made by one plaintiff, and is sufficiently definite, when taken in connection with the declaration. Neither party requiring a jury, the damages were properly assessed by the court under section 40, Laws 1871-2, p. 344.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
-  Home 
-  About Us 

# In This Section

                      -  The GLS Today                          -  What does the GLS do? 
                        -  The St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation 
                        -  The Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway System 
                        -  Meet the Administrator 
                        -  Meet Our Team 
                        -  Careers at the GLS 
                        -  Contact the GLS 
                      -  Historic Photos and Other Artifacts 

## Contact the GLS

Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation (GLS)Policy HeadquartersU.S. Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Ave, SE W62-300Washington, DC20590United States

**Email:**GLS@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-0091****Alt Phone:**800-785-2779****Fax:**202-366-7147****Business Hours:**8:00am-5:00 pm ET, M-F

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

                            - GLS on Facebook
                            - GLS on Twitter
                            - GLS on Instagram
                            - Great Lakes - St. Lawrence Seaway

# GLS Advisory Board meeting minutes September 24, 2020

Advisory Board Meeting Minutes (09-24-2020).pdf (191.46 KB)

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact					latoya.james@dot.gov.*
April 26, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CONNIE VASQUEZ HARRISON, Appellant

NO. 14-10-00759-CV V.

CLIFFORD LAYNE HARRISON, Appellee

____________________

This court today heard a motion for rehearing filed by appellee, CLIFFORD 

LAYNE HARRISON. We order that the motion be granted in part and overruled in part, 

and that this court’s former judgment of March 13, 2012, be vacated, set aside, and 

annulled. We further order this court’s opinion of March 13, 2012, withdrawn.

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, CLIFFORD 

LAYNE HARRISON, signed June 21, 2010, was heard on the transcript of the record. 

We have inspected the record and find the trial court erred. We therefore AFFIRM the 

trial court’s divorce decree in so far as it grants the divorce, but we REVERSE the 

remainder of the trial court’s divorce decree and order it severed and REMAND for 

proceedings in accordance with this court’s opinion.

We order CLIFFORD LAYNE HARRISON to pay all costs incurred in this 

appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.