. . . ..-

,, Technical Report

Number 5 ~

)

Alaska OCS

Socioeconomic

F–- Spionsor:

Bureau of

Land Management

~-

Alaska Outer

Continental Shelf

L Off ice

Baseline Studies: The Beaufort Sea Region (

. Interim Report i
NOI’ICES

1. ThiS docmwnt is disseminated under the spmsorship of the

U.S. Ikpartment of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management

in the interest of information exchange. ‘The U.S. G3vernmnt assms no liability for its content or use thereof.

2. fis is an interti report designed to provide preliminary

comnunity and regional profile data to groups working on

the Alaska OCS Socioemncmic Studies Program. The data

in thiS documnt provides an incomplete inventory of

selected baseline information on the physical and mm-made

enviromt organized into four categories: land use,

land status, transportation, and utilities. A separate

documnt will provide detailed baseline information

focusing upon an understanding of the current social,

econcmic, physical, and demographic conditions of the

13eaufo&~ Sea Petroleum Development Region. The baselines

studies will fom the basis of impact identification with

and without CG develo-t.
ALASKA OCS SOCIOECONOMIC STUDIES PROGRAM

BASELINE STUDIES

OF THE PHYSICAL AND MANMADE ENVIRONMENT

THE BEAUFORT SEA REGION

PREPARED FOR

BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

ALASKA OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF OFFICE

DECEMBER 1, 1977

CCC/HOK
BASELINE STUDIES: THE BEAUFORT SEA REGION

I.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

PAGE

i

BEAUFORT SEA REGIONAL STUDY

INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

LAND USE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

LAND STATUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40

UTILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51

TRANSPORTATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61

COMMUNITY CONTACTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83

BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84

II. BARROW COMMUNITY STUDY

I!iTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88

LAND USE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91

LAND STATUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107

UTILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112

TRANSPORTATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133

COMMUNITY CONTACTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151

BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152

111. KAKTOVIK COMMUNITY STUDY

INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155

LAND USE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160

LAND STATUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169

UTILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172

TRANSPORTATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178

BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184
BASELINE STUDIES: THE BEAUFORT SEA REGION

LIST OF FIGURES

PAGE

INTRODUCTION

A. BEAUFORT SEA PETROLEUM DEVELOPMENT REGION

BEAUFORT SEA REGIONAL STUDY

Figure 1 DESCRIPTION OF THE REGION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . z

Figure2 SETTLEMENTS IN THE REGION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

Figure 3 REGIONAL LAND STATUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , 41

Figure 4 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION ROUTES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63

Figure 5 AIRPORTS IN THE REGION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66

BARROW COMMUNITY STUDY

Figure 1 LOCATION MAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89

Figure 2 BARROW AREA LAND USE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94

Figure 3 LAND USE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , ● . ● 100

Figure4 BARROW REGION LAND STATUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108

Figure5 BARROW AREA LAND STATUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110

Figure 6 PLANNED WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . 119

Figure 7 PLANNED GAS AND ELECTRICAL INTERTIES . . . . . . . . . . . . 127

KAKTOVIK COMMUNITY STUDY

Figure 1 LOCATION MAP . ● . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156

Figure 2 AREA LAND USE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ● . ● ● 161

Figure 3 TOWNSITE LAND USE . . ● . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , 162

Figure 4 KAKTOVIK VILLAGE CORPORATION LAND STATUS . . . . . . . . 170

Figure 5 ROAD TRANSPORTATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182
BASELINE STUDIES: THE BEAUFORT SEA REGION

LIST OF TABLES

.

BEAUFORT SEA

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

PAGE

REGIONAL STUDY

NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH POPULATION GROWTH . . . . . . . . . . . 3

CURRENT NATIVE VILLAGE CONVEYANCES UNDER

THE ANCSA (Sect. 12a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45

SCHEDULE AND FARE STRUCTURE FOR NORTH SLOPE

COMMUNITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65

BARROW COMMUNITY STUDY

Table 1 AERONAUTICAL ACTIVITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135

Table 2 CARGO DELIVERED TO BARROW VIA NORTHSTAR . . . . . . . . . 141

KAKTOVIK COMMUNITY STUDY

None
BEAUFORT SEA INTRODUCTION

INTRODUCTIO N

This report is part of a more comprehensive baseline study of the Beaufort

Sea Petroleum Development Region and its communities as of mid-1977. It

provides an inventory of selected baseline information on the physical and

manmade environment organized into four categories: land use, land status,

transportation, and utilities. A separate document will provide baseline ~

II

information related to the socioeconomic environment. ——

The area that comprises the Beaufort Sea Petroleum Development Region

coterminus with the corporate limits of the North Slope Borough. Its

Ii

is

communities include Barrow, Kaktovik, Point Hope, Point Lay, Wainwright,

Ataksook, Nuiqsut, Anaktuvuk Pass, and the petroleum development base

camp at Prudhoe Bay/Deadhorse.

The report is organized into three sections. The first section discusses

land use and ownership patterns, transportation, and utilities service in

the Region as a whole and in seven of its nine communities. The remaining

two sections discuss aspects of the physical environment in greater detail

for two communities that may receive some of the most significant impacts

of OCS petroleum development in the Region: Barrow and Kaktovik.

METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY

Preparation of the baseline study involved

● Compilation and synthesis of the most

two basic work components:

recent secondary data, drawing

together information from a variety of published and unpublished

sources; and

@ Corroboration and updating of this information through a field visit

to Barrow.
INTRODUCTION

Compilation of Secondary Data

Compilation of secondary data involved research on published and unpublished

documents and reports related to land use, land status, utilities and transportation. The amount and quality of this data varied considerably. Current,

reliable information was available for some study areas, but was completely

lacking in others.

Secondary sources utilized in this phase included land use plans, engineering

and utilities studies, environmental impact statements, local newspapers and

trade journals, inventories of archaeologic and historic sites and Native

corporation publications. A bibliography of this material is included with

each study.

Field Visit

A three-day visit to Barrow was made in May 1977 to corroborate and update

information on the Region, Barrow, Kaktovik and other communities. No

primary research or surveys were undertaken as a part of the field visit.

No field visit was made to Kaktovik specifically for the purpose of gathering

baseline data. Recent trips by members of the study team, combined with

discussions with Borough representatives, provided current information.

The sum of the information gathered from secondary sources and field visits

was organized into descriptions of land use, land status, utilities and

transportation in each community. In some cases, data gaps still exist

for some components, and are noted in the studies.

IDENTIFICATION OF CRITICAL ISSUES

C#itical issues related to the physical environment were identified for the

Region as a whole and the communities of Barrow and Kaktovik, in accordance

with the study design for the Alaska OC$ Socioeconomic Studies Program.

-ii-
BEAUFORT SEA INTRODUCTION

Certain of these issues were common

The following discussion summarizes

reference to condit

gas development.

ons susceptible

to all communities throughout the Region.

some of the key issues, with particular

to change as a resu” t of OCS oil and

Regional Issues

Subsistence activities are the earliest use to which the land and coastal

waters in the Beaufort Sea Region were put. Of the nine communities in the

Region, six are Native villages whose subsistence patterns are primarily

oriented to the sea. During the ice-free summer season, whales, seal, walrus

and fish are taken along the coast. In winter, polar bear and seal are

hunted on the ice pack. Caribou and small game, such as waterfowl and foxes,

are hunted from coastal areas and rivers.

Although snow machines and power boats have enabled Natives to hunt and fish

within larger areas around their communities, many Natives perceive increasing difficulties in obtaining fish and game. A recent decrease in the size

of the Western Arctic Caribou Herd has been followed by State restrictions

on hunting, forcing greatw reliance on purchased meat. Similarly, the

harvesting of the bowhead whale, a significant part of Eskimo subsistence

culture for many thousands of years, has been limited by the International

Whaling Commission.

The North Slope Borough has expressed concern over potential long term

conflicts between oil and gas development activities and the habitats on

which subsistence hunters and fishermen depend. Subsistence areas and

subsistence rights are likely to be impacted by prospective OCS development

activities offshore and by on-shore operation and maintenance activities.

The seasonal migration route of the bowhead whale in the Beaufort Sea,

as well as the denning sites, population size and movement of terrestrial

mammals, could all be affected by OCS petroleum development activities.

The nature and extent of these impacts cannot be determined without more

detailed information on the type and location of OCS facilities.

-iii-
BEAUFORT SEA INTRODUCTION

Archaeology

The Beaufort Sea Region contains materials that span at least 10,500 years

of prehistory. Archaeological findings in the area have provided evidence

of prehistoric migrations into North America, including occupations by

prehistoric Eskimo and Indian groups.

Two coastal areas have received major archaeological attention: Point Hope

and Point Barrow. Extensive archaeological research at Point Hope has led

to the identification of the important Ipuitak Eskimo culture that existed

on the Alaskan Arctic coast from about 200 to 300 A.O., as well as several

thousand years of Eskimo prehistory. The Point Barrow area, the focus of

archaeological investigations since the early 1900’s, has revealed occupation by

Despite

logists

total.

coastal

Without

prehistoric Eskimo groups at least one thousand years ago.

research that has been undertaken thus far in the Arctic, archaeobelieve that the known sites represent only a small portion of the

Both known and unknown sites remain vulnerable to disruption from

erosion, overland transportation and any development a~tivities.

adequate pre-development archaeological reconnaissance, the

construction of ports, overland pipelines and haul roads could disrupt

undocumented sites. Oil spills could also destroy or severely disrupt

sites. The Borough believes that documentation and preservation of these

historical Inupiat hunting and fishing camps and other sites is critical

to protect areas from intrusion and to maintain traditional subsistence areas.

At the same time, it is highly probable that any development activity,

particularly in coastal areas or river valleys, would reveal undocumented

sites. This could require planning for pre-development archaeological

reconnaissance, relocation of development to alternative sites, the

establishment of corridors to minimize impact on sites, and excavations or

recovery of sites before actual construction.

-iv-
BEAUFORT SEA INTRODUCTION

Land Status

Most of the land in the Arctic is owned by the federal government. Of

the approximately 50 million acres in the Region, one-half is included

in National Petroleum Reserve-A and the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

The State owns approximately 3.5 million acres between the Colville and

Canning Rivers, centered on oil development in the vicinity of Prudhoe

Bay . In addition, approximately 1.4 million acres are included in the State’s

trans-Alaska pipeline utility corridor. An additional 3.5 million acres

are owned by nine village corporations that comprise the communities of

Barrow, Kaktovik, Nuiqsut,

and Anaktuvuk Pass and the

As a result of the passage

Wainwright, Ataksook, Point Lay, Point Hope,

regional corporation.

of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act

(ANCSA) in 1971 and the Statehood Act of 1959, the classification of the

~emaining land in the Arctic Region is yet to be finally determined. Major

issues related to OCS development include classification of undesignated

lands, as well as uses permitted on lands which have already been conveyed.

Prominent among current land status issues in the Beaufort Petroleum Development Region is the final resolution of Section 17(d)(2) National Interest

Lands. The legislation finally enacted on (d)(2) lands will determine such

land issues as the kind and amount of mineral extraction allowed to meet

national energy needs, the locations of transportation and pipeline corridors,

and the potential conflicts between subsistence activities and increased

recreational opportunities.

Additional land status issues of relevance to OCS

the Beaufort Region include resolution of pending

petroleum development in

village and regional

corporation selections, and resolution of questions relating to the granting

of easements across Native lands. The locations of petroleum development

base camps, the alignments of supply roads and pipelines, or any resource

development in the Region will be partially determined by these emerging

ownership patterns and the use restrictions that accompany them.

-v-
BEAUFORT SEA

Transportation

INTRODUCTION

Significant difficulties with the construction of roads and railroads on

the North Slope and the lack of construction materials forces reliance on

air transportation and infrequent marine transportation. Although the

terrain is flat and presents no topographic limitations to vehicular

movements, the wet surface conditions in summer and the extremely low

temperatures in winter make overland transportation difficult. There is

only one inter-regional road in the Arctic, the haul road built to service

the trans-Alaska oil pipeline. Although the haul road eventually may be

open for public use, the Prudhoe Bay terminus is still at least 70 miles

from the nearest community, Nuiqsut.

Barge and ship transport is used for the long distance transportation of

heavy cargo, but its use is limited to the six-week period during which

the North Slope is ice free. A further constraint to the use of marine

transport is that the waters off the entire Arctic Coast are shallow,

making the lightening of goods to shore necessary from ocean-going ships

and barges by shallow-draft barges. Nonetheless, marine transport continues to be the most widely used mode for the long distance transportation

of cargo.

All passenger traffic into and out of the Arctic is by air. Both scheduled

commercial flights and non-scheduled charter aircraft serve communities in

the region. Air transport is also the sole year-round means of transporting

supplies to the North Slope.

Reliable and efficient transportation is critical to the communities in the

Beaufort Sea Region and to petroleum exploration and development activities.

OCS petroleum activities will require increased coverage and frequency of

air service as well as the upgrading of existing airport facilities. Continued use of ship and barge transport is anticipated, with further analysis

-v’i-
BEAUFORT SEA INTRODUCTION

of the feasibility of deep draft port development along the Arctic Coast.

With respect to overland road transport, investigation will likely be given

to the use of the haul road connecting

development of OCS base camps or other

Fairbanks and Prudhoe Bay to support

new settlements.

Utilities

Basic utilities service in the Arctic is extremely limited. With the exception of base camps at Prudhoe Bay, specialized military installations, and

a few public facilities in the larger communities, piped water supply and

water-borne sewage disposal systems are not presently in use. Electrical

generation and distribution systems are found in most communities, but are

often unreliable. Gas distribution systems, where they exist, are poorly

designed and maintained.

The limited availability of fresh water, sewage disposal and power generation facilities in the Region has created unsanitary conditions and physical

hardship. Inadequate water storage and sewer and water distribution

systems have in the past also restricted the development of housing and

the provision of other essential community services.

Utilities such as fuel, power and water supply are also important for

petroleum exploration and development activities. In the absence of

adequate infrastructure and utilities services, the petroleum development

base camp at Prudhoe provided its own. OCS petroleum development will

similarly require an adequate utilities infrastructure as well as specialized

facilities. As in the case of Prudhoe, it is likely that it will be

necessary for OCS-related base camps to be self-contained.

All of these issues will be discussed in greater detail as

baseline report describing existing physical conditions in

communities as of mid-1977. The complete baseline report,

part of this

Beaufort Sea

including socioeconomic information, will provide a benchmark against which future growth

and development can be measured.

-vii-
13eaufort Sea Regional Study
.
BEAUFORT SEA REGION INTRODUCTION

INTRODUCTION

The boundaries of the Beaufort Sea Petroleum Development Region

with those of the North Slope Borough. The Borough comprises a

more than 88,000 square miles, an area exceeded by only nine of

are coterminous

land area of

the fifty

states (Dupere & Associates, 1973). Borough boundaries encompass almost the

entire northern portion of Alaska, from Point Hope on the Chukchi Sea in the

west to the Canadian border on the east. Point Barrow is the northernmost

point in the Borough; 68 degrees north latitude forms the southern border. The

Borough is characterized by three physiographic regions: the Brooks Range, the

Arctic foothills, and the Arctic coastal plain (see Figure 1, Description of

the Region).

The North Slope Borough is sparsely settled. In 1976, an estimated 9,053 persons

lived within the North Slope Borough, as contrasted with a 1970 population of

3,451. The Borough’s population is located in nine settlements: Barrow,

Wainwright, Anaktuvuk Pass, Ataksook, Nuiqsut, Point Lay, Kaktovik, Prudhoe

Bay/Deadhorse, and Point Hope. Population change in individual settlements and

in the region as a whole is presented in Table 1. With the exception of Prudhoe

Bay and Barrow, population growth in the region has been slow. Completion of

the trans-Alaska pipeline has actually caused a reduction in population in the

Borough since 1976.

The North Slope Borough was incorporated as a first-class borough on July 1,

1972. The Borough, with administrative headquarters in Barrow, has a variety

of areawide powers, many of which affect the settlements within its borders.

Borough powers include responsibility for streets and sidewalks; sewers and

sewage treatment; water course and flood control; telephone systems; light,

power and heating facilities; water; transportation systems; libraries;

airport and aviation facilities; garbage and solid waste collection and disposal;

housing and urban renewal rehabilitation and development; preservation, maintenance and protection of historic sites (North Slope Borough, 1977).

_l_
Kifh

NSF

z

CJ

d)

w

CL

I.Ll

x

1-

.

1-

Ckf c?

L

3

3
BEAUFORT SEA REGION INTRODUCTION

TABLE 1

NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH POPULATION GROWTH

CENSUS DIVISION ——1976?’ 19751’ ——1975~’ 1974~/

(Community)

——1973 1970 1960

BARROW

Barrow

Wainwright

Anaktuvuk Pass

Cape Lisburne

Ataksook

Nuiqsut

Point Lay

Census Div. Remainder

2,218 2,141

344 341

129 129

112 112

N.A. N.A.

149 149

48 48

2,163 2,163

354 354

134 134

112 112

N.A. N.A.

145 145

27

91 ;;

2,167 2,104

353 315

13483~/ ;:

1,314

253

N!;.

i 28

N./A.

UPPER YUKON

Kaktovik

Deadhorse

Prudhoe Bay 4/ Borough Remainder –

Prudhoe Bay/Deadhorse

119 119 141 141 N.A.

N.A.

5,531 5,022 3,158 927

KOBUK

Point Hope 403 384 404 404 376 386 324

— — .

9,053 —8,445

— .

— 6,729 4,498.—

—.

— 3,757 3,451——

TOTALS

industry for July

industry for January

N.A. Not Available

~/Borough Planning staff count plus actual count by oil

~/Borough Planning staff count plus actual count by oil

~/Estimate same as 1970 Census

~’Alaska Geographic Presentation of 1970 Census Populati~n Counts, State of

Alaska, Department of Labor, Employment Security Division, 1971.

Source: North Slope Borough, Alaska, General Information and Economic Factors,

July 1976.

-3-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION INTRODUCTION

The following discussion is divided into the four sections of land use, land

status, utilities and transportation. Each section includes a discussion of

regional patterns and networks, as well as a summary of facilities or networks

within each of the communities and military settlements in the region.

-L
BEAUFORT SEA REGION LAND USE

LAND USE

The Arctic Region is composed of a flat, treeless coastal plain and the

gently rolling foothills and the North Slope of the Brooks Range. With

the exception of mountainous portions of the Range, most of the land is

inhabited by waterfowl and large mammals, such as caribou and polar bear.

The area is primarily used for subsistence activities of Eskimos living in

eight small villages. These isolated communities are located either along

the coast or inland along fishing rivers or near caribou migration routes.

Although the 88,000 square miles in the Arctic Region comprise fully 15

percent of Alaska’s land, these coinnunities represent only one percent of

the State’s population.

In addition to Native villages, there are a number of other specialized

settlements in the region. The location of these facilities has been based

either upon their strategic importance to national defense, or upon their

proximity to prospective locations of underground reserves of oil and gas.

Approximately 17 U.S. Air Force Distant Early Warning (DEW Line) radar

communication sites were established in the 1950’s, fivemf which are in

operation today. These stations serve to monitor enemy aircraft movement

along the entire Arctic coast.

.

Oil and gas exploration and development base camps are located at Prudhoe

Bay and at isolated locations within the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska”

(formerly Naval Petroleum Reserve-4). Petroleum exploration has taken place

in the Reserve for 35 years, and continues today. In 1968, oil exploration

in the vicinity of Prudhoe Bay yielded the discovery of the largest underground petroleum reservoir in North America. Construction of base camps,

wells and the trans-Alaska pipeline created a community at Prudhoe Bay,

which will be maintained during the estimated 20-25 years life of the

field (David Maze, Administrator, BP Alaska).

-5-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION LAND USE

This section of the Regional Baseline report discusses categories of land “

use in the Arctic Region: settlement (including Native villages, military ‘

installations, and oil and gas development base camps); historic uses and

archaeological sites; and areas used for subsistence hunting and fishing.

-6-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION LAND USE

Settlement

SETTLEMENT

CURRENT SETTLEMENT PATTERNS

Settlement in the Beaufort Sea Region includes traditional Native villages

and more recently developed military and oil and gas development base camps.

Most of these settlements are located near the coast of the Chukchi or

Beaufort Seas (see Figure 2., Settlements in the Region). Military installations include Navy research stations and Distant Early Warning (DEW Line)

radar communications facilities. Facilities at each of the approximately

DEW Line Stations are discussed under Air Transportation.

17

Traditional settlement in the Arctic consisted of bands of Eskimos or villages

whose location and size was determined by available fish and game. With the

coming of the white whalers in the mid-nineteenth century, the military

after World War II, missionaries and centralized government ’services, there

have been major changes in settlement patterns (Dupere, 1973). Today, these

small Eskimo encampments have been consolidated into five principal villages:

Barrow, Kaktovik, Wainwright, Anaktuvuk Pass and Point Hope. Three other

villages -- Point Lay, Nuiqsut and Ataksook -- are also traditional Inupiat

village sites that are now being resettled under the sponsorship of the

Arctic Slope Regional Corporation pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims

Settlement Act of1971.

.

Community Development

Nearly all of the people in the NorthS lope Borough live in eight communities

and the petroleum development base camps around Prudhoe Bay. Barrow is

the largest of these settlements, with a population which is now estimated

at approximately 2,300 (North Slope Borough, 1977). Of the total of 2,170

people in 1975, government employment comprised approximately 300 persons

(U.S. Dept. of the Navy, 1977).

-7-
IUUIW2U 1 -

9—.-... ——

C0rIMUNlTlE5

ACT,D4E P15TANT

Al%N~NED OR

_.— ———. —..

i

,

EARL+ IAIAKNING (DEN Line> 5TNIONS

CONVERTED DEW L-he 5$ATION5

—-.

13EAUFORT SEA REGIONAL STUDY s SETTLEMENT% N THE REGION
BEAUFORT SEA REGION LAND USE

Settlement

to Prudhoe Bay. Total transient population housed at Prudhoe Bay “

in 1976 was estimated at 5,531 (North Slope Borough, 1976).

Each of the self-contained camps has its own personnel quarters for a

module of approximately 150 men, including office space, shops, warehouses,

kitchens/dining facilities, recreation facilities and related storage.

Each camp has its own enclosed water supply/treatment and sewage

systems. BP supplies electricity for its own facilities and those of

ARCO. Most of the service companies purchase electricity from Arctic

Utilities, Inc., a subsidiary of the NANA Development Corporation.

Other land uses include two airports and a small service airport in

the western field, water storage sites,

support buildings (for such services as

planned central utility facility for BP

Prudhoe Bay itself, and sanitary dumps.

.

gravel sites, service company

engineering and supply), a

and ARCO, port idevelopment on

● National Petroleum Reserve-A Exploration Base Camps

The National Petroleum Reserve-A covers an area of approximately 37,000

square miles or nearly 50 percent of all the land in the Region. It

extends along the coast from Icy Cape on the west to the Colville River

on the east, and follows the Colville south into the Br~oks Range.

(See Figure 1, Description of the Region. )

The NPR-A was created as Naval Petroleum Reserve-4 (NPR-4) by President

Harding in 1923. Under the Executive Order, the Secretary of the Navy

was charged to “explore, protect, conserve, develop, use and operate”

the Reserve. The description of past and planned oil and gas exploration in NPR-A which follows is largely based upon the Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Continuing Exploration and Evaluation of

Naval Petroleum Reserve No. 4, by the Dept. of the Navy, 1977.

Initial oil and gas exploration was conducted between 1944 and 1953 by

a civilian contractor. Drilling near Barrow in 1949 created the South

-17-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION LAND USE

Settlement

Barrow Gas Field, on which the City of Barrow still depends for .

electrical generation and heating fuel. During the nine-year exploration period, a total of nine gas and oil fields were investigated.

Recoverable reserves were estimated by the Navy at over 80 billion

barrels of oil and over 300 billion cubic feet of natural gas. Other

estimates by the Bureau of Mines for the Umiat Field alone were much

higher (Dept. of the Navy, 1977).

After the 1944 to 1953 exploration period, it was determined that exploration was not complete. Navy geophysical surveys and test wells

were drilled in succeeding years with inconclusive results. In 1973

the oil embargo by Arab countries directed new attention to domestic

reserves. Congress approved additional exploration of NPR-4 in order

to have reliable estimates on which to efficiently undertake production, should Congress so authorize. i

Seismic and related geophysical work was begun in 1976 by Husky Oil

Company in Zone “A”, between Dease Inlet and the Colville River, in

the vicinity of Teshekpuk Lake. The location was chosen a: a result of

its proximity to the highly productive Prudhoe Bay Field to the east.

Although oil industry geologists have recently stated their belief

that potential oil reserves in NPR-A have been greatly ~xaggerated by

the Navy, the exploration goes on (Anchorage Daily News, April 7, 1977).

The Navy has requested authorization for well exploration at 19 additional sites. This exploratory activity will take place under the control

of the U.S.

transferred

survey, and

Each of the

Dept. of the Interior, to whom responsibility for NPR-A was

in 1977. Large areas of NPR-A will undergo geophysical

the specific locations of the 19 wells will then be chosen.

five wells drilled in the Teshekpuk Lake vicinity during

the winter of 1976-77, and the 19 planned in the near future require

specialized industrial facilities. A 5-foot thickgravel runway or ice

airplane runway (to 5,000 feet in some cases) is built near the

drilling site, and is equipped with runway lights, a homer beacon,
-,

,,

!.

BEAUFORT SEA REGION LAND USE

Settlement

wind-measuring equipment and other facilities for safe and efficient

:,,.

operation. Drilling takes place on a5-foot thick gravel drill pad

on which housing, maintenance shops, drilling equipment, and steel

or bladder fuel tanks are also placed. Water tanks are built nearby

to meet the estimated 40,000 barrel requirement for a typical 60-day

drilling period.

four planned deep

own package waste

Itwill require 150 to 300 days to drill each of

exploratory wells. Each camp will also have its

water treatment and solid

These operations are planned to be serviced

the coast of NPR-A. The five wells drilled

gravel borrow sites along the coast at Cape

and logistical bases at the Lonely DEW Line

waste incineration facility.

. .

from logistical bases along

during 1976-77 utilized

Simpson and Cape Hal kett,

site (POW-1) and the NARL

base at Barrow. The planned exploration program will use Lonely, .

NARL and possibly Umiat and the Wainwright DEW Line station. The potential also exists for utilization of other DEW Line stations in NPR-A

(Peard Bay-LIZ C, Cape Simpson~POW A; Kogru Inlet-POW B, and Icy

LIZ B).

.

● QXQ!L

The Lonely DEW Line site served as the base camp for exploration

the winterof 1976-77. It has a-recently lengthened and widened

5,200 feet long by 150 feet wide, with lighting and navigational

Capeduring

runway,

-,

equipment. It also has a small hangar and freight handling equipment.

Fuel is delivered by barge and piped ashore into gasoline tanks having

a total capacity of 141,000 gallons, or’into JP-5 fuel tanks with a

total capacity of 1,680,000 gallons. JP-5 fuel is used for aircraft,

drill “rig operation, electrical generator operation, diesel powered

equipment and heating. Two additional 1,260,000 gallon welded steel

tanks were

fuel. This

type trucks

scheduled for construction in the sumer of 1977 for JP-5

fuel is transported by aircraft or smooth-tired rolligonto operating sites.

-19-
)

BEAUFORT SEA REGION LAND USE

Settlement

The fuel storage capacity of NARL is 2,385,000 gallons, contained in

five welded tanks containing JP-5 fuel, and one bolted steel tank

containing gasoline. All the tanks were constructed in the late 1940’s

and early ‘50’s. Since that time, the tanks have had their bottoms

reinforced and are continually maintained. A 6-inch line offloads

fuel into the tanks from barges that arrive each summer. Two airstrips

are available at Barrow. One is the community’s State-owned 6,500-

foot long by 150-foot wide asphalt runway, which has minimal fueling

capability; and the NARL

The latter has lighting,

houses and equipment for

as the extensive fueling

5,000-foot by 150-foot steel-planked airstrip.

navigational aids, two hangars, storage warefreight handling and major repairs, as well

facilities.

The NARL facility at Barrow served as a trans-.shipment and communications headquarters for operations during 1976-77, with Lonely as its field

headquarters (Dept. of the Navy, October 1975). It is likely that

NARL will be used for exploration supply in the northwestern portion

of NPR-A during the current program.

.

In order to provide operational and safety communications to geophysical

survey camps within NPR-A, the Lonely DEW Line station’s transportable

earth station will connect to a loop network

stations within the Reserve.

Housing at Lonely consists of accommodations

station, an additional 24 at the nearby Navy

camp for 50 men built recently by Husky Oil.

e Umi at

Depending on the

may be used as a

of NPR-4. lhniat

of gravel.

of eight telephone repeater

for 20 at

camp, and

the DEN Line

an expanded base

new areas outside of Zone “A” to be explored, Umiat

secondary site, as it was during

has a camp, a good airstrip, and

the early exploration

good nearby sources
BEAUFORT SEA REGION LAND USE

Settlement

● Wainwright

It is possible that barges may be offloaded at Wainwright for overland or air transport of supplies to some of the 19 proposed well

sites. Because Wainwright Inlet is more protected from pack ice

than Beaufort Sea offloading sites, Wainwright could be used for

a longer time each summer than could either Barrow or Lonely.

Additionally, supplies could be transported 20 miles over the ice

of Wainwright Inlet during winter.

Depending on the success of seismic surveys in the area, Wainwright

could have a fuel storage site and prefabricated housing for 50 men

constructed near the DEW Line station. In this capacity, Wainwright

would function as a field operation center, similar to Lonely.

t

.

-21-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION

ARCHAEOLOGIC AND HISTORIC SITES

LAND USE

Archaeologic and

Historic Sites

CURRENT STATUS OF ARCHAEOLOGIC AND HISTORIC SITES

Archaeological Data

The Beaufort Sea Region contains materials which span at least 10,500 years

of prehistory. Archaeological findings in the area have provided evidence

of prehistoric migrations into North America, including evidence of

interior occupations by prehistoric Eskimo and Indian groups. Prehistoric

and historic material from the area have provided insights into the movements

and interactions between prehistoric Eskimo groups, as well as between

Eskimo and interior Indian groups.

The archaeological data and literature for the Beaufort Sea Region reflect

the intensity of research at certain locations and the complete absence of

archaeological investigation at others. Two coastal areas have received

major archaeological attention: Point t-lope and Point Barrow. In the

interior of the Beaufort Sea Region, two broad areas have been. the focus

of archaeological investigations: an area of northwest Alaska, which includes

the National Petroleum Reserve-A and the Utikok, Kukpowruk, and Kokilik

River area; and a large area of the central Brooks Range afid the Arctic

slope area to the north. “.

Of the coastal areas, Point Hope has been the focus of extensive archaeological research. Several thousand years of Eskimo prehistory have been identified from numerous archaeological sites, which have led to identification

of the important Ipiutak Eskimo culture that existed on the Alaskan Arctic

coast from about 200 to 300 A.D.

The Point Barrow area has been the focus of archaeological investigations

since the early 1900’s. Archaeological materials have revea?ed occupation

by prehistoric Eskimo groups at least a thousand years ago. Earlier material

has been recovered from the Barrow area, but these findings have not been

fully reported in the archaeological literature at the present time.

-22-’
BEAUFORT SEA REGION LAND USE

Archaeologic and

Historic Sites

The coastal area of the Beaufort Sea to the east of Point Barrow has been

subjected to only minimal archaeological research, although there has been

archaeological reconnaissance of the lower Colville River and its delta.

The central Brooks Range and the Arctic Slope is an area that has received

continual archaeological attention since the 1950’s. This area has yielded

important archaeological materials related to the prehistory of Alaska for

the last 10,500 years, as well as interior Eskimo adaptation.

An extensive discussion and bibliography of the archaeologic literature

relevant to the areas described above can be found in Chapter 15 of the

Literature Survey, Technical Report 2, of the Socioeconomic Studies Program.

Inventories of Archaeologic Sites

Inventories, maps and other published material that attempt to provide a

comprehensive picture of known archaeological resources in the Beaufort Sea

Region have been produced by State, federal and Borough agencies and

Native corporations. .

The Alaska Division of Parks, Office of History and Archaeology, has published

a computerized inventory of known archaeologic and historic sites (Alaska’s

Heritage Resources, 1976). The list includes data for over 4,000 sites by

U.S. Geological Survey quadrangle, but the inventory is perhaps 50 percent

complete and individual entries exhibit a high degree of inaccuracy.

The Arctic Slope Regional Corporation, with the assistance of the University

of Alaska Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center (AEII)C), has produced maps at a scale of 1:500,000 which document Native land uses. These

maps, called Native Land Use and Place Name Maps of Arctic Alaska, depict

s~bsistence use areas and trails, as well as cemeteries, old places-villages,

cabins, old graves, “siniktaknalok” (forbidden places), ruined cabins,

hunting camps, travel camp places, drying rack places, and fish camps. The

-23-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION LAND USE

Archeologic and

Historic Sites

maps, which were published in 1975, confirm the pattern of known archaeological sites in coastal areas, river valleys, and the central Brooks Range

in the general region of Anaktuvuk Pass. Other areas are less fully covered

because of a lack of documentation or exploration. No text accompanies

these maps.

The data on these maps will be updated through a program presently being

carried out by the North Slope Borough to identify sites and nominate them

to the National Register of Historic Places.

ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORIC SITE ISSUES

Planning Implications

Archaeological resources of the Beaufort Sea Region have at least two important planning implications. First, all relevant literature concluded that

only a small portion of existing archaeological sites in the Region have been

identified or studied. Thus, it is highly probable that any development

activity, particularly in coastal areas or river valleys, would potentially

reveal undocumented sites. This could require planning for p~e-development

archaeological reconnaissance, relocation of development to alternative sites,

the establishment of corridors to minimize impact on sites; or excavations

or recovery of sites before actual construction.

Second, sites are important to Natives of the Region as providing evidence

of the continuity of their ctilture and as corroboration of present subsistence rights. Since many archaeologic sites are historic hunting and fishing

sites, the Borough’s program to identify and nominate sites to

Register may offer additional protection to subsistence areas.

provisions for sites in the Register would also be a factor to

in any development planning.

Legislation and Administrative Programs

the National

Protection

be considered

Federal and State laws pertaining to cultural and archaeological resources

in the Beaufort Sea Region include:
BEAUFORT SEA REGION LAND USE

Archaeologic arid

Historic Sites

●

●

Q

e

e

●

Federal Antiquities Act of 1906, requiring the protection of American

antiquities, including historic and prehistoric sites on federal lands.

The Historic Preservation Act of 1966, creating the National Register

of Historic Places. Sites listed in

tected from encroachment by projects

States, and in most cases are eligib”

under the National Historic Preserva”

for acquisition, stabilization and/or

September 1976).

Executive Order 11593 of 1971, requir.

the National Register are profunded or licensed by the United

e for 50 percent matching grants

on Act. Grants may be used

restoration (Division of Parks,

ng federal agencies to inventory

their cultural resources and submit nominations to the National

Register for all qualified sites.

Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of 1971, Section 14(h)(l),

authorizing the Secretary of the Interior to withdraw and convey to

appropriate Native Regional Corporations title to existing cemetery

sites and historical places.

National Petroleum Reserve Act of 1976, requiring determination of

the historic value of the National Petroleum Reserve in Al&ka by 1979,

as part of the land use planning process for the Reserve.

Alaska Historic Preservation Act of 1971, providing fo~the protection

and preservation of historic and archaeologic resources in Alaska.

.

North Slope Borough Land Use Inventories

.

The North Slope Borough, through its”areawide historic preservation responsibilities, is documenting traditional land uses in three areas:

e The Wainwright area and inland in the Utukok River watershed;

e The coastal region

e The coastal region

Canadian border.

These studies are being

between Teshekpuk Lake and Prudhoe Bay; and

and foothills from Nuiqsut to Kaktovik and the

carried out by Ms. Flossie Hopson, of the North Slope

Borough Planning Department. Oral histories gathered from interviews with

Native informants have identified and determined the cultural importance of

-25--
BEAUFORT SEA REGION LAND USE

Archaeologic and

Historic Sites

historic and archaeological sites, including cabins, graves, physical remains,

sod houses, fishing areas, trapping areas and whaling sites. Some of these

sites will be submitted for inclusion in the National Register of Historic

Places as a means of preservation and protection.

This material is also being used by the Borough to document the “overall

significance of the land and its subsistence resources to the Inupiat people

in the past, at present and in the future.” (North Slope Borough, Feb. 1977). “

The assessments of sites will be used by the Borough Commission on History

and Culture as a guide for protection of sites; the Planning Commission will

also use the data as an element of a future areawide land use plan.

The North Slope Borough Commission on History and Culture has adopted the

completed Beaufort Sea Traditional Land Use Inventory and the Nuiqsut-Tasikpak

Traditional Land Use Inventory. It is projected that perhaps one-third more

sites than are currently indicated on the AEIDC maps, cited earlier, will

be identified through these studies. More importantly, these studies go

beyond a simple inventory to assess the value of the sites in maintaining .

Inupiat culture. The Borough is in the process of publishing the results

of this inventory and assessment program to be titled Beaufort Sea Study/

Historical and Subsistence Site Inventory: A Preliminary ~ultural Resource

Assessment (Flossie Hopson, North Slope Borough Planning Department, 1977).

National Petroleum Reserve Studies

The National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska (NPR-A) was transferred to Department of the Interior management by the National Petroleum Reserve Act of

1976 (P.L. 94-258). Under the terms of the Act, historic values of the

Reserve are to be determined by April 1979.

Assessment of the Known Cultural Resources of the National Petroleum Reserve

in Alaska (Schneider and Bowers, 1977) is both a summary, based on secondary

sources of archaeological

tions for research. Both

identify the disparity in

which are relatively well

resources of the Reserve, and a series of recommendathe data summary and the research recommendations

archaeological data for areas outside the Reserve

researched, and the “virtually unknown” interior

-26-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION

of the Reserve. The data summary is accompanied by maps

LAND USE

Archaeologic and

Historic Sites

at 1:250,000 scale

locating 152 known sites within NPR-A and 467 sites adjacent to Reserve

boundaries. This distribution is cited to document the need for archaeological reconnaissance within the Reserve.

Archaeological field work is being undertaken by the National

during the summer of 1977 to determine historic values of the

teams will be based at Umiat, on the Colville River, and will

connaissance and site testing to determine the archaeological

Park Service “-

Reserve. Five

perform repotential of

representative environments in the Reserve. Two teams will work along the

Colville River by raft; the other three teams will cover areas of Howard

Pass, Knife Blade Ridge, and tributary creeks of the Colville River.

This survey of various physical environments will cover only a small area

of the Reserve, but will give an indication of the archaeological resources

that could be potentially found in similar, unexplored areas of the Reserve.

A report on this field work is anticipated to be available in early 1978.

As

is

of

part of a recently begun land use planning program for NPR-A, a contract

currently being negotiated between the North Slope Borough and ‘federal offices

the National Park Service, Bureau of Indian Affairs, andz Bureau of Outdoor

Recreation, which would provide continued funding to the Borough

and archaeological site identification. Responsibilities of the

include determination of subsistence and recreation resources in

It is anticipated that the Borough, through Flossie Hopson, will

for historic

BIA and BOR

the Reserve.

continue the

oral history techniques to identify ”sites significant to the past and present

culture of Natives.

Proposed Projects

Archaeological resources have been considered in environmental impact statements on proposed projects in the Beaufort Sea region. These reports include

the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (U.S. Dept. of the Interior, 1974),

the proposed natural gas pipeline (ibid., 1976), offshore oil and gas development (ibid., 1975), and exploration of the National Petroleum Reserve (U.S.

Dept. of the Navy, 1977).

.-

-27-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION LAND USE

Archaeologic and

Historic Sites

Comon to these environmental impact statements is reference to the relative

lack of knowledge of archaeological sites in project areas. The statements

also cite the high probability that many new archaeological sites will be

identified through additional field work. The EIS on NPR-A exploration

states, “with proper precautions, exploration may have a positive impact,

as scientific benefits could result from the discovery of new historical

or archaeological sites.” (U.S. Dept. of the Navy, 1977).

Alyeska Pipeline Impact

Archaeological data relevant to the Alyeska Pipeline project have been included in field studies and reports since 1970. John Cook, the archaeologist

directing this work for the University of Alaska, has authored a series of

reports that document the significant archaeological material obtained from

locating and excavating sites along the pipeline route. These studies also

provide a basis for estimating the cost of researching and recovering the

archaeological resources impacted by pipeline or other petroleum-related

development: the total cost of the University of Alaska research for 680 miles

of the pipeline route was $1.75 million. .

Other Impact Considerations

.

Certain coastal areas of the Beaufort Sea Region are subject to severe coastal

erosion processes. For example, the Point Hope peninsula has been eroding

at the rate of 8.6 feet per year on the north side and depositing 2.9 feet

on the south side (Dupere and Associates, 1973).

The impact of such natural processes on coastal archaeological resources has

not yet been documented. The magnitude of this impact could be severe.

-28-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION

SUBSISTENCE

LAND USE

Subsistence

● CURRENT SUBSISTENCE LAND USE -

Subsistence activities are the earliest use to which the land and coastal

waters in the Beaufort Sea Region were put. Patterns of hunting and fishing

for coastal communities have traditionally been different from those for

inland communities. Coastal Eskimos (Taremiut) have traditionally occupied

numerous permanent villages along the Arctic coastline and at the mouths

of rivers. Here they hunted migratory marine mammals, fish, and terrestrial

mammals. While the hunting of sea mammals, such as bearded seal, spotted

seal and walrus, was important to the Taremiut subsistence lifestyle, bowhead

whaling has always provided its focus (Dupere & Associates, 1973). Of the

‘ nine communities in the Region today, six are Native villages whose subsistence

patterns are oriented to the sea.

The inland Eskimos (Nunamiut) were more nomadic. Their land use patterns

have been constantly limited by the occurrence, abundance and movement of

wildlife, especially the Arctic and Porcupine Caribou Herds. -The summer

range of the Arctic Herd is located generally west of the Colville River

and the Porcupine Herd east of the river. Temporary settlements were established along the annual northern and southern caribou migration routes

crossing the Brooks Range. The caribou provided meat for food, skins for

making clothing and tents, and antlers for making implements. Anaktuvuk

Pass, a settlement in a valley of the Brooks Range, is the last remaining

Nunamiut community.

Today, patterns of subsistence around coastal villages are dependent upon

seasonal fish and wildlife migration, and terrain and sea ice conditions.

During the ice-free summer season, whales, seal, walrus and fish are taken

along the coast. Wet tundra makes overland travel difficult, so caribou

and small game, such as waterfowl and foxes are hunted from coastal areas

and rivers. In winter, polar bear and seal are hunted on the ice pack.

-29-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION LAND USE

Subsistence

In the past, there were isolated areas on the North Slope where caribou were

free from any human hunting. Great distances, dog sled transportation and

hand boats limited hunting areas to locations accessible to villages and

camps.

Today, however, hunting efficiency has increased significantly. The use of

outboard motorboats, snow machines and portable communications devices such

as CB radio have increased accessibility to an extent that there are no areas

of the North Slope that are not hunted (John Burns, Biologist, Alaska Dept.

of Fish and Game). Although the most intensively hunted and fished areas

are within 25 to 40 miles of each coastal community, residents of Barrow

and Kaktovik occasionally trap and fish in the central portion of the Beaufort

Sea coast, between the Colville and Canning Rivers (Alaska Div. of Policy

Development and Planning, 1975).

SUBSISTENCE LAND USE ISSUES

The rights of Native Alaskans to hunt and fish are presently undergoing much

discussion in Alaska. During 1977, hunting restrictions were.placed both

on the harvesting of the bowhead whale as well as on caribou. The issues

surrounding each of these decisions are discussed below. .

Bowhead Whale Hunting Restrictions

During the latter half of1977 much of the attention regarding subsistence

hunting focused on the attempt to reconcile the harvesting of the bowhead

whale by the Inupiat Eskimos with national and international policies

surrounding declining whale populations in general and the alleged decline

of the bowhead in particular.

The relationship of the Inupiat Eskimos to the bowhead whale is a symbiotic

one that has existed for many thousands of years. The whale is an integral
BEAUFORT SEA REGION LAND USE

Subsistence

part of the Eskimo experience. Preparations for the hunting season, the

hunt itself, the butchering of the whale and the division of food and other

products from the whale are not onTy important elements of Eskimo life

but, in the opinion of many Eskimos and anthropologists, the defining

elements of Eskimo culture (Newsweek, November 7, 1977). According to

Dale B. Stotts, the North Slope Borough official responsible for resource -

protection and management for the Borough, “hunting the bowhead is what

keeps our communities together. Our people depend on the bowhead, first

for food and, just as importantly, for the survival of our culture

(Rensberger, October 5, 1977).

For the Inupiat Eskimos, the bowhead whale has provided a variety of

~ products. It is principally valued as a food source. The bowhead is more

flavorful than other whales, and for this reason is highly regarded (Weller,

October 31, 1977). The flipper, consisting of skin and fat, is especially

prized, as is muktuk, the skin of the whale plus a thin strip of meat

(Anchorage Daily News, November 3, 1977).

.

Between 1848 and 1910, the period in which the bowhead was commercially

hunted by Yankee whalers, the bowhead was valued in world commerce for its

baleen, used for stays in corsets, and for its whale oil (~ensberger,

October 5, 1977). Following the turn of the century, the numbers of bowhead

whale were so severely depleted that the commercial harvesting of bowhead

was outlawed by international treaty in 1931 (North Slope Borough, NSB

Asserts Leadership in Whaling Controversy, paid advertisement in Anchorage

Daily News, October 10, 1977). The protection afforded the bowhead was

enhanced by the Marine Mammals Protection Act of 1972 and the Endangered

Species Act of 1973; both pieces of legislation address the protection of

the bowhead, but both exempt aboriginal people from regulation (Weaver &

Brown, 1977).

,-

-31-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION LAND USE

Subsistence

The current controversy regarding subsistence hunting rights of the

Eskimo in relation to the possible extinction of the bowhead whale arose

from the June 1977 meeting of the International Whaling Commission, a

17-member organization formed in 1946. At the June meeting, the

Commission, concerned about the depleted population of bowhead and the increasing number of reports of whales “struck and lost,” voted to impose

a zero quota on aboriginal hunters beginning with the 1978 season. The

United States, concerned about its leadership role in reducing the

commercial harvesting of whale, abstained from the vote and refused to

file an objection to the IWC ruling.

However, at a special meeting of

Commission voted to lift its ban

until 18 whales have been struck

Borough Mayor Eben Hopson termed

nutritional needs (San Francisco

the IWC on December 6-7, 1977, the

on the bowhead and to permit hunting

with a harpoon or 12 landed. North Slope

the 18-whale quota as inadequate to meet

Chronicle, December 8, 1977).

The relationship between OCS activities in the Beaufort Sea and the whale

harvest is unknown, but it can be conjectured that OCS activities may

disrupt bowhead migration patterns and Eskimo whaling activities.

.

Caribou Hunting Restrictions

An important concern of North Slope residents relates to State game

management of the Western Arctic Caribou Herd. Because of recent drastic

declines in the size of the Herd, the Alaska Department of Fish and Game

(ADF&G) has restricted hunting of caribou in the North Slope Borough.

The ADF&G has concluded that declines from 250,000 animals in 1970 to 50,000

in 1975 were caused by a number of factors, including subsistence hunting and

the predatory activities of wolves. The increased efficiency of hunting

brought about by greater use of the snow machine may also have contributed

to the devline (John Burns, Biologist, ADF&G). Until recently, the 10,000

residents of the 30 communities of northwest Alaska were taking approximately

-32-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION LAND USE

Subsistence

30,000 animals annually while wolves were estimated to consume 1,160 to

1,400 caribou each year (Alaska Consultants, Inc., 1976).

The recently created North Slope Borough Department of Conservation and Environmental Security also notes this decline in the Herd, but attributes it to

migration of caribou from the Western Herd to the Eastern Porcupine Herd,

perhaps as a result of such activities as seismic petroleum exploration in

National Petroleum Reserve-A, and construction and operation of the transAlaska pipeline.

In order to restore

by ADF&G during the

the Herd’s size, seasonal limits on hunting were imposed

hunting season which ended March 31, 1977. In the North

Slope Borough, a harvest of 3,000 bulls was allowed and allocated among

communities on a need/historic use basis as follows: Barrow-320, Wainwright150, Ataksook-10, Anaktuvuk Pass-340, Point Lay-40, Point Hope-150. Kaktovik

was not limited by the restrictions, since its residents hunt the Porcupine

Caribou Herd in the East Arctic.

In the past, some families in Barrow have killed as many as 20-caribou in

a single year. Consequently, representatives of the Department of Conservation

and Environmental Security of the North Slope Borough have stated that this

restriction represents an extreme hardship for North Slope residents. Further,

they have termed inadequate the State’s compensation of $10,000 for purchase

of supplementary foodstuffs at Barrow. In response to the State’s caribou

hunting restrictions, the North Slope Borough formed a Borough Game Management Committee in 1976 in conjunction with the Arctic Slope Regional Corporation (AsRc). This Committee represented an initial step in the recent formation of the Department of Conservation and Environmental Security. The

Committee’s purpose is to establish policies which include man as the “index

specie”, recognizing his subsistence needs as an integral part of game management. The Committee plans to work

surveillance of the Arctic Caribou

patterns, age and general health.

-.

with federal and State agencies to conduct

Herd, documenting its size, migration

The Borough hopes to combine this empirical
BEAUFORT SEA REGION

knowledge with oral history

role of local government in

of Environmental Protection

Game Management

The federal and

ment in Alaska.

LAND USE

Subsistence

of traditional Inupiat hunters to pioneer the

North American Arctic game management (Statement

Policy of the North Slope Borough, 1977).

State governments share joint responsibility for game manageUnder present programs, the State manages game on federal

and State lands, with the exception of federal programs for marine mammals

(Marine Mamnals Protection Act of 1972), and migratory birds (International

Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918).

The federal Marine Mammals Act prohibits hunting on federal lands by nonNatives, but not by Natives for subsistence use. Native subsistence hunting

cannot be restricted under the law unless the species is proven to be endangered, or it is used for commercial purposes. Federal activities are

generally confined to enforcement of the hunting prohibition against nonNatives, and cataloging the uses by Native subsistence hunters.

The State believes, however, that the federal systems policies~f nonintervention are not protecting certain marine mammal species (John Burns,

Biologist, ADF&G). This position is endorsed by federal wiTdlife managers

as well (Andy Williams, May 26, 1977). The Joint Federal-State Land Use

Planning Commission (FSLUPC) has also stated in a recent paper that wildlife

management and regulation of fishing and hunting through a permit system

should remain under statewide management plans developed for each species

(Janet McCabe, FSLUPC). These plans are now under preparation.

The management of walrus has been returned to the State after

approximately 5 years during which it was protected under the

Act . The ADF&G is also anxious to have polar bear management

a period of

Marine Mammals

returned to the

State because federal management places no bag limits, or sex, size or

seasonal restrictions on the hunting of polar bear (John Burns, Biologist,

ADF&G) .

-34-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION

In developing its policies for game managemnt, ADF&G

LAND USE

Subsistence

and some State legislators are interested in defining better the term “subsistence” in order to

establish who may hunt and fish, and how much fish and game may be taken.

Particularly at issue is the commercial value of subsistence resources.

Originally, subsistence was defined largely in terms of self-sufficiency.

Commercial value was not traditionally recognized. However, since cultural

artifacts have become valuable, Native craftsmen have been provided an outlet for their handicrafts, and demand for walrus ivory in particular has

increased dramatically (John Burns, Biologist, ADF&G). Recognizing the

potential threat to certain wildlife, recent federal legislation has been

enacted for marine animals and endangered species, such as the polar bear.

This legislation restricts hunting to the Native Alaskan, who may sell parts

of the animal only after some local labor is performed to make it a work of

art or handicraft (North Slope Borough, 1976).

The State, however, is concerned that subsistence for commercial purposes

may be jeopardizing sound game management procedures. The number of walrus

harvested in Alaska, for example, has doubled during the last ten years.

During the same period, harvests of seal, which have no commercial value,

have decreased 60 percent (John Burns, Biologist, ADF&G). It is argued

that a more explicit definition of subsistence could allow ADF&G to create

better criteria for allocating game resources among Natives and non-Natives.

- ==-=====-. . . ..— .

The Alaska Legislature is presently discussing formation of an Interim

Committee on Subsistence which would.work for a legal definition of stibsistence. Others, such as David Chase, Director of the Alaska Federation of

Natives Bush Justice Project, opposes a definition that they believe could

result in further restrictions to Native subsistence activities (Jeffery

Richardson, May 18, 1977).

Because federal law recognizes Natives as ethnic entities under international

treaties, and grants them special consideration in maintenance of subsistence

values, the federal government receives greater support by Alaska Native

-35-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION LAND USE

Subsistence

groups in its game management programs than does the State. Citing the

federal government’s “trust responsibility to protect aboriginal subsistence

rights to the Arctic Caribou Herd,” Billy Neakok, Director of the Department

of Conservation and Environmental Security, recently asked the Secretary of

Interior to intercede on the Borough’s behalf in removing State caribou

hunting restrictions (letter to Secretary Cevil Andrus, May 25, 1977). -

Land Management

In addition to policies for management of game, there are a number of alternatives for management of lands under Section 17 (d-2) of the Alaska Native

Claims Settlement Act that could affect subsistence activities in the Region

in different ways. The Act extinguished Native aboriginal rights, but stated

,that subsistence rights were to be protected. It is contended by some,

however, that the 40 million acres to which Natives received title under the

Act is not sufficient to maintain a subsistence economy. Two basic reasons

are cited. The piecemeal distribution of this land, often not in proximity

to Native villages, does not coincide with migratory patterns of game. This

is especially true on the North Slope, where much of the land around Barrow

is unavailable for regional selection because it lies within NP~-A. Further,

land selected under the ANCSA will compete with other prospective profit-making

uses, under pressure for development before the lands will be taxable in 1991.

Consequently, there is great interest in proposals now before Congress on

alternative mechanisms for management of game on proposed National Interest

Lands (d-2) and final decisions relative to subsistence uses permitted on

Public Interest Lands (d-l]. The Joint Federal-State Land Use Planning

Commission has recently stated that subsistence rights should be given

priority over sport and commercial use on National Interest Lands, with the

exception of national parks (McCabe, JFLSUPC).

Proposals of Representative Morris Udall would be most restrictive in controlling large blocks of d-2 land under federal management. Although the

-36-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION LAND USE

Subsistence

Alaska Federation of Natives is not endorsing the Udall bill, they are

supportive of federal game management procedures, such as the Marine Mammals

Protection Act, that could be continued for d-2 lands.

A total of over 3 million acres is included in d-l and d-2 lands in the

Arctic Region. Final decisions relative to activities permitted on these

lands will have significant consequences for future subsistence activities

on the North Slope, particularly for residents of inland villages closer

to these lands, such as Anaktuvuk Pass.

Land Use Conflicts

Rapid increases in State population during the last ten years and new growth

,and development have created additional pressures on subsistence resources.

Between 1965 and 1975 the State’s population increased 65 percent while

hunting and fishing licenses sold, and private aircraft registered, almost

doubled (Wentworth, Alaska Center for the Environment, 1977). With the

decreased wildlife habitat in urban areas, hunters and fishermen are finding

more incentive to fly into remote areas to hunt and fish,

Although recreational hunting and fishing in the

(ADF&G estimates that less than 4 percent of the

attributable to recreational hunting), it can be

Potential OCS oil and gas development, potential

.

Arctic is now limited

total caribou harvest is

expected to increase.

public use of the transAlaska pipeline Haul Road, development of tourist facilities in North Slope

communities, and more frequent and reliable air service will all contribute

to increased recreational hunting and fishing. With limitations on land

areas and seasons open to hunting, severe competition between subsistence

needs and recreational desires could result. Since economic benefits could

accrue to North Slope residents for outfitting recreational hunting and

fishing parties, conflicts with villages over cultural versus economic

values are expected.

State game management plans do not discriminate between subsistence hunters

and fishermen on the basis of race. That is, both Native and non-Native

I -37-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION LAND USE

Subsistence

residents of Alaska are subject to the same game management principles and

practices of the State. Federal game management, under the Marine Mammals

Act, however, requires no bag limit-or seasonal restriction to Natives.

If State plans to manage polar bear and all other species on a sustained

use basis are approved, no special privileges for subsistence hunting and

fishing in Alaska would prevail. Consequently, there is much concern among -

Native groups and Borough officials that State game management will

exacerbate competition between Natives and non-Natives over restricted game.

Issues of Oil and Gas Development

Declines in the Arctic Caribou Herd raised questions over activities of

the Navy in oil exploration in NPR-A. Residents of Barrow believe that

construction and use of ice roads for seismic exploration have affected

migration patterns of caribou who have eventually died. Dead fish found

on the banks of streams and lakes in the vicinity of oil exploration have

been attributed to seismic detonation close to bodies of water.

Concerns for future oil and gas development include locating bqse camps

where minimal impact to subsistence activities could occur, and restricting

hunting and fishing activities of non-resident temporary workers (Resource

Planning Associates, 1976).

4

The construction, operation and maintenance activities associated with

Outer Continental Shelf exploration and development could involve the movement of people and supplies into an area important to subsistence. This

intrusion could affect animal movements, denning sites and population size.

A second issue arising from OCS activities concerns the relationship between

subsistence and potential transportation and utility corridors. Frequently

used roads, airports and the construction and maintenance of pipelines can

create disturbance or barriers to movement of terrestrial mammals.

-38-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION LAND USE

Subsistence

The North Slope Borough is actively pursuing formal working relationships

with the Inupiat of the Canadian Arctic for purposes of game management, land

management and joint policy development for OCS activities in the Beaufort

Sea. In June 1977, the North Slope Borough hosted an international Inuit

Circumpolar Conference, bringing together Eskimos from Alaska, Canada and

Greenland, along with energy experts from those areas. Since migratory -

fish, fowl and caribou do not obey international borders, the Borough argues

that policies must be developed which allow for maintenance of subsistence

values along with oil and gas development policies for the entire Arctic.

-39-
)

BEAUFORT SEA REGION

LAND STATUS

LAND STATUS

CURRENT LAND STATUS

Land tenure in the Arctic is divided between areas of fixed ownership and

areas in a state of flux. Most of the land in the Arctic is owned by the

federal government. Of the approximately 50 million acres in the Region,

one-half is included in the National Petroleum Reserve-A (formerly Naval

Petroleum Reserve-4) and the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. The State

owns approximately 3.5 million acres between the Colville and Canning

Rivers, centered on oil development in the vicinity of Prudhoe Bay. An

additional 3.5 million acres of land is owned by nine Native villa9e corporations comprised of the communities of Barrow, Kaktovik, Nuiqsut, Wainwright,

Ataksook, Point Lay, Point Hope and Anaktuvuk Pass, and the regional

corporation. Approximately 1.4 million acres in the region are included

in the State!.s trans-Alaska pipeline utility corridor.

.

~%$

As a result of passage of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA} in b

/(.’ *:

1971, and the Statehood Act of 1959, the classification of the.remaining land

in the Arctic Region is yet to be finally determined. The ANCSA called for

disbursement of 40 million acres of federal land to newly-formed Native

regional and village land corporations. The Statehood Act ~alls for transfer

of 104.5 million acres of national forest, connnunity expansion, education and

recreational lands from the federal government to the State. Since the passage

of the ANCSA, the State’s program has been largely suspended, and much of its

original entitlement remains to be selected. In turn, the organized boroughs

created by the legislature in 1963, are permitted to select 10 percent of

the State lands that are included within the Boreugh’s boundaries. More detailed discussion of the ANCSA and-the Statehood Act and their provisions is

included in the. Alaska Regional Profiles: Arctic Region, published in 1975

by the Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center.

) Figure 3, Regional Land Status, illustrates areas of fixed federal, State

and Native Corporation ownership as well as remaining areas where other
‘“%

o

REGIONAL d VlLL4+f3E CORi%3F2iTKX4 5ELECTKM$5 WITHIN NORTH 5L(WE E30KC)UEM

FEE 1-j 5TATE LAIQJD5

FEE CNEKX3LECTK)N

, m5TATE UTILITY COKRIDC)K

5u@3x?l=AcE f?16Kl?3 50URCE : ARL.TIL 6LOPE REGIONAL. CORPORATION

%Ul&jlJ~FKE CW13R5ESLECTKN’N f>

WKFACE5 FUGI+T5) ONLY

41b

E3ENJFORT SEA RE610NN- 5TLDY REGIONAL LAND STATUS
BEAUFORT SEA

)

federal, State, Borough, and

made. The following briefly

LAND STATUS

Native corporation land applications have been

summarizes major land status classifications

within the region and discusses issues

settlement or jurisdiction.

National Petroleum Reserve-A

In 1923 an Executive Order established

Reserve-4. A series of Navy claims to

been contested by the State and Native

Reserve is in dispute along the entire

of current importance regarding final

the 23 million

areas included

corporations.

Colville River

Cape. Additionally, the Navy claimed jurisdiction to

acre Naval Petroleum

in the Reserve has

The boundary of the

and the coast to Icy

a 2-mile buffer zone

around the Reserve, and ownership of coastal tidelands in Smith Bay, Harrison

Bay, Peard Bay and Kasegaluk Lagoon in 1974 (Skladel , May 1974). Al though

the State received title to tidelands three miles from the highwater mark

of the coastline under the Submerged Lands Act of 1953, the Navy redefined

the NPR-4 boundary from the highest highwater mark to the mean highwater

mark, thereby assimilating shallow, potentially oil-rich submerged tidelands

from the State. To date, the State has made no formal response to the Navy’s

action. .

On June 1, 1977, Congress placed the Reserve under control of the Department “

of Interior and renamed it “National Petroleum Reserve-A”. “Presently, it

is not clear how jurisdictional transfer from the Navy to DOI will affect

resolution of these boundary disputes.

Arctic National Wildlife Refuge .

The Arctic National blildlife Refuge extends from the Canning River at Camden

Bay to the Canadian border, and south across the Brooks Range, approximately

150 miles from the Beaufort Sea. An estimated 8.9 million acres, or twothirds of its entire area, is included within the Borough’s boundaries.

As part of the “National Interest” federal parkland selections under provisions of Section 17(d)(2) of the ANCSA, the Department of Interior in

October 1974 proposed an expansion to include an additional 3.7 million

-42-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION LAND STATUS

)

acres south and west of the Refuge. Along with portions of the proposed

Gates of the Arctic National Park in the central Brooks Range, these d-2

lands in the Borough comprise approximately 2.8 million acres. Final decision on d-2 recommendations by Congress is expected no later than

December 17, 1978.

.

State Lands

The State has 3,411,700 acres of land patented and an additional 1 million

acres pending or tentatively approved along the eastern bank of the Colville

River, and in the vicinity of Point Lay, Point Hope and around other Native

villages. Additional selections are expected with boundary resolution of

d-l and d-2 withdrawals.

North Slope Borough

In 1963, when the legislature created the organized boroughs, it permitted

each borough to select 10 percent of the State’s General Grant Lands conferred

under the Statehood Act. The North Slope Borough has applied for nearly all

of its 10 percent allotment of State patented land, or 33,324 acres. The

State, however, has rejected these application;, maintaining th~t the lands

are unavailable for selection because of prior State commitments in the form

of oil and gas and other leases and permits. Because this Has not been the

practice of the State in the past, the Borough has the issue in court

(Alaska Consultants, Inc., December 1976) .

Whatever additional lands the State selects, once boundaries of the d-1 or

d-2 lands are more formally fixed, the Borough will be entitled to an additional 10 percent of the State’s lands. Under the Statehood Act, the State

is required to complete its land selection procedure by 1984, but the

Borough has no set time for selection of its entitlement.

Native Regional and Village Corporations

)

The Arctic Slope Regional Corporation recently became the first Native

regional corporation in the State to receive interim conveyance of

nearly all the land it is entitled to under the ANCSA. On June 3, 1977, the

-43-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION LAND STATUS

ASRC received its last conveyance from the Bureau of Land Management, bringing

its total of surface and subsurface lands to 2.9

tional 221,575 acres near Anaktuvuk Pass pending

not be fully conveyed until surveyed-sometime in

now has all the privileges and rights of ownersh<

Regional Corporation Conveyances

million acres, with an addiAlthough the lands will

the future, the Corporation

P“

Lands yet to be conveyed to the Corporation include “in lieu” and “dual

withdrawal” lands. The in lieu lands consists of subsurface rights that

normally would have been requested in conjunction with village-selected surface lands at Barrow, Wainwright, Nuiqsut and Kaktovik, but were unavailable

because of prior subsurface rights of the NPR-A and the Arctic National

Wildlife Refuge. Dual-withdrawals lands include areas selected by the ASRC

‘but which are also identified for inclusion in the proposed d-2 lands.

)

Village Corporation Conveyances

Villages in the region have obtained interim conveyance for lands totalling

more than 700,000 acres. Wainwright was the second community in the State

to receive its full conveyance of 105,312 acres. Barrow, the eighth largest

Native village in the State, received most of its remaining allotment at the

same time--a transfer of 201,232 acres. The status of vill~ge selections is

shown on Table 2.

Native Allotments

The Alaska Native

Interior to grant

Allotment Act of May 17, 1906, authorized the Secretary of

up to 160 acres of land to Native Alaskans. Although the

Act was terminated by the passage of the ANCSA in 1971, applications filed

before that date are still being processed and honored. About 250.parcels,

totalling 37,500 acres are applied for in the Arctic Region (Alaska Reqional

Profiles: Arctic Region). Most allotments are located along the coastal zone

from Harrison Bay to Kaktovik and lesser numbers from Harrison Bay west to

Cape Lisburne, and inland along rivers.

. .

-44-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION TABLE 2 LAND STATUS

)

CURRENT NATIVE vILLAGE CONVEYANCES UNDERTHE ANcsA (SECT. 12a)

Ataksook (Ataksook Corporation)

Barrow (Upgeagvik Inupiat Corporation)

Kaktovik (Kaktovik Inupiat Corporation)

Point Hope (Tigara Corporation)

Point Lay (Cully+Co~poration)

)

Wainwright (Olgoonik Corporation)

Subtotal

Nuiqsut (Kuukpik Corporation)

Anaktuvuk Pass (Nunamiut Corporation)

Acreage Received

no information

201,232

65,000 (selected)

127,912 (selected)

85,300

105,312

703,000

-o-

-oAcreage Pending

no information

-ono information

no information

--

5,160

.

115,200

90,000

Source: Anchorage Times,

and Data Center,

June 4, 1977; Arctic Environmental Information

Alaska Regtonal Profiles: Arctic Region, April 1975

.

-45-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION

)

LAND STATUS

LAND STATUS ISSUES

The Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act is the dominant land status issue in

the region. The following discussion relates to the distribution of conveyed

lands as well as.to the uses to which they may be put.

National Interest Lands

Congress is presently considering legislation (HR-39, sponsored by Representative Morris Udall) on so-called National Interest, Section 17(d)(2), lands.

Important components of the legislation include: the amount of land to be

included in the system of National Parks, Wildlife Refuges, Forests and Wild

and Scenic Rivers; the schedule for absorbing the designated lands into these

systems; and the recreational, resources extraction and transportation uses

allowed under each.

The Udall proposal would include l15”million acres in the system. Portions of

this land area included in the North Slope Borough are all of the proposed

additions to the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (8.4 million acres), portions

of the Gates of the Arctic National Park in the Central Brooks Range (13.6

million acres total), and portions of the Noatak National Preserve (7.6

million acres total).

.

Key alternative proposals to the Udall bill include those of Governor Jay

Hammond and the Joint Federal-State Land Use Planning Commission (JFSLUPC).

The Governor’s proposal would set aside 25 mi 11 ion acres until the year 2000,

allowing for potential resource development in the interim period. The proposal of the JFSLUPC would include 44 million acres in the four national

systems, an additional 46.7 million acres into a “fifth system”, designated

as Alaska National Lands, to be jointly managed by four federal agencies:

Fish and Wildlife, Park Service, Forest Service and the Bureau of Land

Management.

Differences in these proposals within the Beaufort Sea Petroleum Development

) Region are presently inconclusive, but relate to alternative delineations of

land areas to be included in the Brooks Range portion of the system. The

-46-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION

proposal of the JFSLUPC would add the following North Slope

wild and scenic rivers sytem: the 1

Chukchi Sea near Icy Cape); the IkpBeaufort Sea at Smith Bay); and the

Beaufort Sea at Camden Bay).

tuko

kpuk

Cann

LAND STATUS

rivers to the

River (which empt es into the

River (which empties into the

ng River (which empties into the

The legislation finally enacted on (d)(2) lands will determine such land uses

as the kind and amount of mineral extraction allowed to meet national energy

needs, the locations of transportation and pipeline corridors, and the

potential conflicts between subsistence activities and increased recreational

opportunities.

Native Corporation Management

Recent conveyances to the Arctic Slope Regional Corporation and village corporations have created conditions for the planning, management and potential development of resources on these lands. For example, the conveyance of Regional

Corporation lands to the ASRC has resulted in an exploratory drilling program

approximately 30 miles southeast of Umiat. The second well at the “Tulugak”

location was recently drilled. These and other lands selected }y the ASRC

will be managed by the Corporation at least unti’

have the option of leasing or selling the shares

Future oil and gas development activities on reg.

lands could require special agreements relating

rights. For example, the village of Nuiqsut has

1991, when

of stock in

.

onal or vii”

shareholders

the corporation.

age corporation

o surface and subsurface

received a selection of

approximately 5 square miles within the boundaries of the State Nearshore

Oil Lease Area. Under an agreement between the ASRC, the village corporation

and the State Division of Lands, Nuiqsut will retain surface rights and the

State will retain the subsurface rights to these five sections (State Division

of Policy Development and Planning, April 1975).

Easements Across Native Lands

Future activities of the regional and village corporations are dependent upon

resolution of litigation against the Bureau of Land Management by the ASRC.

-47-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION LAND STATUS

Six regional corporations are challenging the right of the Department of

Interior to grant easements across all conveyances made under the ANCSA,

including Native lands. These rights were promulgated by the Secretary of

Interior in two administrative orders, dated February 5, 1976 and March 5,

1976, which qualify rights of access preserved under section 17(d)(2) of

the ANCSA.

The administrative orders are significant to the regional and village

corporations, first because they establish broad discretionary power of

use and access across

over these rights and

conveyances to Native

sumner 1977.

Native lands; and second, resolution of litigation

specific requested easements could delay the land

corporations. Earliest expected settlement is-late

The first administrative order (DOI, February 5, 1976) related to reservation

of local public easements across all lands conveyed under the ANCSA. The

easements are meant to reserve lands for transportation, utilities, communications corridors and facilities and for recreational use by the public. Transportation easements could be established for such facilities as roads and

trails, railroad spurs, docks, navigational aids for watercraf~or aircraft,

and aircraft landing sites.

.

The easements would be precisely located wherever possible, “exceptw here

they would result in substantial delay in the issuance of conveyances.”

Guidelines for reservation of easements include assessment of public use

along with special consideration of the “effect of a proposed easement on

Native lifestyle and subsistence needs.” Additional guidelines require

review of recommendations of the Joint Federal-State Land

sion (JFSLUPC), other federal agencies, the State, Native

Use Planning Commicorporations and

the general public.

The JFSLUPC has stated its position that no surface

be established across (d-2) or other lands at this

Management Planner, JSFLUPC). Because locations of

-48-

easement corridors should

time (Janet McCabe, Land

resource development in
BEAUFORT SEA REGION LAND STATUS

the future are speculative, and intercommunity transportation needs cannot

be projected with certainty, the Commission finds no present justification

for designation of corridors. It believes that multi-modal transportation

corridors should be planned in the context of a statewide land use planning

process.

Two additional provisions of the Act have particular significance to subsistence

fishing activities. The order established a continuous linear easement of

25 feet in width along the entire coastline of the State. This easement would

be used for the beaching of watercraft and aircraft, travel along the shore,

recreation and other similar uses, such as camp sites. A second provision

calls for reservation of a 25-foot wide easement along the banks of rivers

and streams that have highly significant present recreational use.

The second administrative order (DOI, March 5, 1976) relates to additional

public easements for inter-regional or interstate transportation of natural

resources. This order requires reservation of public easements across all

Native land for transportation of resources that are ProPertY of the United

States or that are intended for delivery to the United States. The easements

include the right to construct any related facilities necessar~ during periods

of planning, locating, constructing, operating, and maintaining or terminating

transportation systems. Pipelines carrying federally owned-oil and gas from

National Petroleum Reserve-A to the trans-Alaska pipeline corridor, for

example, could cross Native Lands at Nuiqsut, or Regional Corporation-selected

lands in the vicinity of Umiat. Although the easements are not meant for

benefit of privately owned energy, fuel and natural resources, the provision

of easements for transport of resources to the United States would appear to

allow easements for nearly all resource development. For example, energy

fuels such as coal could be mined and shipped through regional corporation

and village corporation lands to ports along the Arctic Ocean.

Additionally, the order provides for crossing of all lands conveyed pursuant

to the ANCSA, rather than delineating specific rights-of-way. Although consent

by the owner of the land is required before designation of a right-of-way,

-49-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION LAND STATUS

the United States may exercise right of eminent domain if such consent is

not given.

An additional suit has been filed by-the Alaska Public Easement Defense Fund,

representing sportsmen and recreational interests. In contrast to the suit

by regional corporations to restrict transportation corridors, this suit

seeks a broader interpretation of the Act, allowing for greater public access

onto Native lands.

The relationship between OCS development and all of these easements is not

known at this time. Because OCS development areas have not yet been identified, potential impacts of easements to serve them can not yet be assessed.

.

-50-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION

UTILITIES

UTILITIES

CURRENT UTILITIES SERVICE

Basic utilities service in the Arctic is extremely limited. With the exception of base camps at Prudhoe Bay, specialized military installations, and

a few public facilities in the larger communities, piped water supply and

water-borne sewage disposal systems are not presently in use. Electrical

generation and distribution systems are found in most communities, but are

often unreliable. Gas distribution systems, where they exist, are poorly

designed and maintained.

facili ties are typically

disposed of at community

Most fuel for heating is costly, and fuel storage

inadequate. Solid waste and sewage containers are

dumps too infrequently to keep pace with demand.

As a result, refuse and garbage remains around most houses, creating unsanitary conditions detrimental to community health.

Despite the inadequacy of existing systems, basic utility services are of

critical importance to life safety in the Arctic. In recognition of this

fact, the North Slope Borough has given highest priority to th~ir development (1977 Capital Improvements Program Revisions). Electrical generation

and distribution are scheduled to proceed first, followed by safe water and

sewage systems.

.

The following summary of utilities in the Arctic Region is primarily based

on surveys undertaken for the North Slope Borough by Dupere & Associates

(Reconnaissance Study : An Inventory of the Borough and Its Communities,

October, 1973; and Manpower Development and Community Survey Reports, July

1974) . Although nearly four years have passed since completion of the first

study, much of the information remains valid. While housing, comniercial

development and community facilities have been developed in North Slope

communities, utility systems have typically not been expanded to serve them.

In the past, the Public Health Service Aid Program for sanitary facilities

(Sanitary Faci Ii ties for American Indians Program Public Law 86-121), was

tied to new housing construction in Alaska communities. However, in order

-51-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION UTILITIES

to expedite the construction of needed housing, ”PHS requested that funds

for new housing be separated from funds for development of sanitary facilities.

Water, Sewer and Solid Waste

Utilities service to housing units in the Region are woefully inadequate.

0ver90 percent of the housing units surveyed in the 1970 Census lacked

some or all basic plumbing facilities. The Dupere & Associates’ survey of

communities in 1974 showed that only 10 percent of the housing units surveyed

in Barrow and Kaktovik had piped water systems. Moreover, where piped water

systems exist, they are for internal distribution only. Water still has to

be hauled to the dwelling unit where it is deposited in central storage tanks

before distribution. Seventy percent of the new housing units surveyed

lacked a bathtub or shower, and even fewer units had installed sinks.

The same study indicated that the only flush toilets in the Region are selfcontained, and operate like honey bucket systems -- requiring emptying.

Similarly, water used in cooking, cleaning and washing is generally disposed

of through dwelling unit drainage systems, directly onto the ground outside

of the dwelling. llupere noted that such a system of sewage disposal was

.

undoubtedly one of the major factors contributing to recurrent epidemic outbreaks of infectious hepatitis within communities.

.

Human waste is collected in plastic bags or fifty gallon barrels which are

then dumped at conununity dumps and covered with gravel. In some communities,

dump sites are left uncovered, while at others such as Wainwright and Barrow,

facilities exist for incineration.

The majority of the Region’s residents obtain their water by either hauling

water and/or ice from lakes near their communities. Water consumption

varies from an estimated 10 gallons per day in Barrow to 2 gallons per day

in smaller communities (Johnson and Dryer, in press). By contrast, water

used at the DEW Line stations averages 47 gallons per day, and water used

at the Naval Arctic Research Laboratory (NARL) in Barrow, averages 124 gallons

per day (ITT Arctic Services, Inc.).

-52-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION UTILITIES

Because each dwelling unit provides its own water, consumption is not -

monitored. Consequently, water consumption estimates can vary dramatically.

The Public Health Service estimates a present per capita consumption at

Barrow of as high as 35 gallons per-day. Thus, the amount of water consumed

under the present ad-hoc system provides little reliable basis for design

of newer systems.

Electricity and Heatin~

Eighty-five percentof the housing units surveyed by Dupere and Associates

in 1974 had electrical service. Communities with the most efficient electrical

service were Nuiqsut, Point Lay and Anaktuvuk Pass.

Power generation and distribution systems range from those which are Boroughowned and privately operated, such as Barrow, to communities with small generators serving a very few homes, such as Anaktuvuk Pass. Gas turbine powered

generators recently installed at Barrow have a 2710 kilowatt capacity, with

1600 kw generators as back-up capacity.

The NARL facility at Barrow has a 3000 kw system of four 750 h gas turbine

generators.

The Central Power Station

capacity of 24,000 kw and

.

being built for British Petroleum will have a

will include a 69 kv switch yard. A major gas

turbine generator plant is now under construction in California for shipment

to Prudhoe Bay, which could help provide more power for the operation of oil

field production facilities.

The heating fuel used in most communities is heating oil, with the exception

of Barrow which uses natural gas. A reliable, inexpensive source”of heating

fuel and permanent storage facilities are high priorities for communities in

the Beaufort Seat Region. The North Slope Borough recently negotiated a

lower consumer rate for gas from the South Barrow Field to serve the community

of Barrow. As a result ‘of these negotiations, the rate was lowered from

504 per thousand cubic feet (MCF) to 32.4$ MCF.

-.

-53-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION UTILITIES

The Borough is also attempting to convince national energy policy planners

to adopt an Arctic Community Energy Policy that will provide other Arctic communities with low-cost gas from nearby gas fields. The Borough’s successful

effort in lowering the Barrow gas rate and its new regional policy is based

upon a provision of the Naval Petroleum Reserve Act of 1976 that prohibits

the Secretary of the Navy from including amortization of the federal investment in the rate base for Barrow (North Slope Borough, January 1977).

UTILITIES SERVICE ISSUES

The North Slope Borough has been instrumental in developing plansfor improvements to utilities systems in the Region. The proposed improvements are based

on an inventory of the Borough and its communities conducted by Dupere & Associates in 1974 that projected capital improvement requirements from FY 1974 -

FY 1980. Each year this capital improvement program is updated by the

Borough, incorporating the projects i~entified in the inventory together with

any newly identified projects.

The Borough’s annual capital improvement program contains a brief description of each project, the costs identified by the Dupere & Associates study,

an identification of funding, and any potential difficulties in-obtaining

required funds. The basis for cost estimates in the yearly CIP does not

reflect inflation since 1974. The Dupere & Associates stud~as well as the

annual revisions are essentially a statement of broad-based objectives rather

than a definitive action plan. Although a priority ranking from 1 to 3 is

assigned for each project, there is no assurance that any specific project

will be undertaken in a given year.

The demand estimates are based on the projections of individual agencies,

such as the Public Health Service, which provide services to Borough residents.

The assumptions underlying these estimates often are not stated.

The provision of a multi-use facility (designated “Life-Health-Safety”

facilities), containing a reliable water supply, power source and health

care facilities, is an important priority of the North Slope Borough Plan-

-54-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION UTILITIES

ning Department. The construction of these facilities is seen as the

necessary precondition for the provision of other facilities, such as basic

health care clinics. Similar facilities, or variations containing public

showers, laundry, sewage and solid waste treatment, are likely to be built

in North Slope communities in the future.

One such facility was built in Wainwright in 1972 by the U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, under a program called the Alaska Village Demonstration

Project. The facility contained water and water treatment and a one million

gallon storage, sewage treatment and solid waste disposal (incinerator) and

laundry. Because of the chlorine taste of the treated water, many residents

preferred hauled water. The facility was destroyed by fire in 1973, and

was recently rebuilt by EPA.

Other systems (e.g., Kaktovik) are in the design phase. In order to capitalize

upon waste heat produced by electrical generators, the systems are planned

to be integrated with future water , storage and sewage treatment facilities.

Space will be provided in each central community utility facility for the

relocation of electrical generation equipment. .

The draft Capital Improvements Program includes plans for concurrent development of water and sewage systems in North Slope communities: costs of

improvements will be jointly shared by the U.S. Public Health Service (which

will fund service to the community at large), and the Borough (which will

fund service to public facilities within the community).

Initial development will be funded substantially by the PHS. During this

first phase, all villages will receive the following facilities: a developed

water source, with a central watering point and safe water treatment; a

central laundry/showers/toilet facility; and a sewage disposal system. The

sewage disposal system will typically consist of an outfall into a sewage

lagoon, or vehicular collection and disposal.

-55-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION UTILITIES

A second phase, with portions to be funded by the Borough and village residents, will consist of distribution service to public facilities and individual homes as required by residents. The Borough has allotted 1977/78 funds

for development of a Utility Management System under which it plans to

establish maintenance and operational procedures with the PHS.

The

are

@

@

o

s

●

e

@

The

communities scheduled for water improvements in the Beaufort Sea Region

as follows:

Barrow - PHS study of three-block-long utilidor due fall 1977 (future

linkages due 1980)

Nuiqsut and Point Hope - 1979 (presently in design phases)

Ataksook - 1980

Point Lay - 1981

Wainwright - Not needed (EPA Central Utility Facility complete)

Anaktuvuk Pass - No participation by PHS. Borough responsibility

for completion of initial phase “as soon as possible.”

.

Prudhoe Bay - Borough-funded project underway.

Prudhoe Bay water supply and waste disposal project is ~nique among

community projects funded by the Borough. The Borough is in the process of

developing a Central Utilities Facility at Prudhoe Bay containing water

supply, sewage and solid waste disposal facilities. A solid waste incinerator

is presently complete but not in operation. When the entire complex is constructed, it will provide contract services to oil companies in Service Area

10 of Prudhoe Bay. NANA Environmental Systems has been contracted to design,

construct and operate the complex (Herbert Bartel, Planning Director, North

Slope Borough).

Plans for water supply include a three-year program for dredging of a gravel

site near the Sagavanirktok River to create a reservoir for water supply.

-56-
BEAUFC)RT SEA REGION UTILITIES

t

The 600,000 cubic yards of gravel will be used to supply development in the

area, including potential improvements requiring 300,000 cubic yards of

gravel at the State airport at Ileadhorse which is approximately one to two

miles south of the gravel/water supply site. Permit applications were filed

with the Army Corps of Engineers in January 1977.

The project is being held up, however, pending settlement of litigation

against the Borough by oil companies at Prudhoe Bay. The companies have

contested the Borough’s rights to levy special assessments within Service

Area 10 to cover its general obligation bonds totaling $2.5 million in

construction costs for the complex. The State has funded the balance of

the approximately $14.5 million facility.

.

.

-57-

.
BEAUFORT SEA REGION UTILITIES

Communications

COMMUNICATIONS

Communications facilities are operated by State and federal government

agencies for civil aviation and national defense installations, and by

private industry such as RCA and Wien Air Alaska airlines. Until recently,

radio and radio-telephone were the primary communications systems serving

individual communities such as Kaktovik, as well as construction camps at

Prudhoe Bay and Deadhorse. However, the construction of telecommunications

satellite earth stations at Barrow and Wainwright, and the planned construction of others at North Slope communities will bring long distance telephone service to some otherwise isolated locations. Within communities,

citizens’ band (CB) radio is enjoying increased use as well.

Facilities for communications in the Beaufort Sea Petroleum Development

Region are established to serve three basic needs:

● Telephone service via telecommunications satellite

9 Military defense through DEW Line radar sites

.

● Specialized communications to serve oil exploration and development

Each of these broad categories of communications is discus~ed below in terms

of functional requirements and the facilities.

Telecommunications Satellite System

Within a few years of assuming responsibility for the Alaska Communication

System from the Air Force in 1971, RCA Alascom has introduced satellite

technology throughout the state. As part of its agreement with the State

to construct 100 satellite earth stations throughout Alaska, RCA inaugurated

satellite telephone service in the Arctic early in 1977. At that time, RCA

put into service a new satellite earth station at Anaktuvuk Pass, giving

this settlement its first reliable telephone contact with the outside world,

and a second satellite earth station at Barrow.

-58-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION UTILITIES

I

Corrununications

The capabilities of the 33-foot diameter earth station at Barrow suggest the

range of telecommunications services that can be brought to other isolated

areas of Alaska. Prior to the installation of the earth station, Barrow

had seven long distance circuits. Now Barrow has 20 long distance channels

for public use, and more can be added to meet future needs. In addition

to public long distance uses, the earth station also carries private line

circuits, including channels for the Public Broadcasting System, the Alaska

Native Health Service and teletype and telex customers (Alaska Industry,

1977; Paul F. Reitmeier, Manager, Industrial Marketing, RCA Alascom).

The following is a list of selected communities within which RCA Alascom

plans telephone system improvements:

Present Toll Circuits 1981 Planned Toll Circuits

Barrow 20 32

)

Idainwright 1 1

Nuiqsut 2 2

Kaktovik o 0

Source: Paul F. Reitmeier, Manager, Industrial Marketing, RCA”Alascom.

DEW Line Stations 4

Alaska’s military Distant Early Warning System (DEW Station) was established

by the Air Force in the 1950’s to provide intermediate radar detection of

enemy aircraft. Stations were built along the Arctic coast from Point Lay

to the Canadian border at approximately equal intervals (50 miles optimum).

Operational difficulties with the doppler radar system and more sophisticated

detection systems have eliminated the need for most of these stations. Of

the approximately 12 stations originally built, only four are now in operation: Point Lay, Wainwright, Barrow and Barter Island (Kaktovik).

The remaining stations have either been abandoned or converted to other uses

such as logistical bases for petroleum exploration in National Petroleum

Reserve-A, or wildlife research such as two stations within the Arctic

-59-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION UTILITIES

Communications

National Wildlife Refuge. The most potentially useful facilities at these

deactivated DEW Line stations are air strips and fuel storage facilities.

Original communications facilities established at each DEW Line station

included three small buildings housing radar equipment, vehicles and staff

quarters. Nearby, fuel was provided in storage tanks to power a tractor

and electrical generator, and to heat the buildings. A gravel runway of

between 1500 and 3500 feet In length was built to serve all of the supply

needs of the station. Some of the airstrips have been widened and lengthened

and outfitted with navigational aids and lighting.

The communications facilities are under exclusive use by the Air Force, and

permission to land must be granted in advance by the DEW system office in

Colorado Springs, Colorado. Villages normally use the airports for

special cargo deliveries or emergency. However, the North Slope Borough

has established a Joint Use Agreement which allows commercial use of the

Barter Island airstrip for Kaktovik residents.

Coinmunications for Oil and Gas Exploration

Continuing exploration of NPR-A from the deactivated DEW Line ktation at

Lonely on the east side of Smith Bay, approximately 60 miles southeast of

Barrow, includes plans for communications facilities. *

The POW-I site about one-half mile east of Lonely has an RCA transportable

earth station. Communication links are also planned between the earth

station and 7 small telephone repeater station points in NPR-A (U.S. Dept.

of the Navy, 1977). Included in the closed loop system is a repeater

station at the deactivated Cape Simpson DEW Line site. As backup to the

system, there is a long-haul VtlF/LIHF radio hookup to the Deadhorse and

Barrow stations, which in turn are tied into their respective telephone

systems.

-60-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION TRANSPORTATION

TRANSPORTATION

The two major nmdes of long distance transportation to and within the Arctic

are air transport and ship or barge transport. With the exception of rudimentary road systems in each community, there

in the Arctic, the haul road built to service

Transportation in the Arctic is characterized

significant seasonal limitations to vehicular

is only one inter-regional road

the trans-Alaska oil pipeline;

by great travel distances and

movement. The distance between

Barrow and Fairbanks, for example, is 475 miles; between Barrow and Nuiqsut

is 140 miles, and between Barrow and Kaktovik is 300 miles.

Significant difficulties with the construction of roads and railroads on

the North Slope forces the reliance on air transportation and infrequent

marine transportation. Although the terrain is flat and presents no topographic limitations to vehicular movements, the wet surface conditions in

summer and the extremely low temperatures in winter make overland transportation difficult. The trans-Alaska pipeline haul road follows an alignment .

along a river and avoids most of the wet tundra coastal plain. Although

the haul road eventually may be open for public use, the Prudhoe Bay terminus

is still at least 70 miles from the nearest community, Nuiq-sut.

The development of roads has been further limited by the lack of road

construction materials. It is necessary to place three to five feet of

gravel over the surface of the tundra in order to prevent disturbance to

permafrost. Removal or damage of the tundra mat causes exposure of the

permafrost and erosion which is hard to arrest. The erosion can produce

frost heave that can make a road impassable..

Marine transportation has been the best alternative to overland transportation,

although it too has significant seasonal limitations. Goods can only be

brought in for a few months a year, when the shore-fast ice melts and allows

shallow draft barges to approach the shore. Six tons of freight enter the

state by water for every ton shipped by air (Parker, 1972]. Most of the

-61-
BEAU FORT SEA REGION TRANSPORTATION

heavy cargo and fuel transported to Arctic communities is carried by ship

and barge. However, air transportation is assuming an increasingly important

role.

All passenger traffic into and out of the region is by air. Both scheduled

commercial flights and non-scheduled charter aircraft serve communities in

the region. All the cargo transportation requirements in winter are met

by aircraft. Figure 4, Regional Transportation Systems, indicates the

current intra-regional and inter-regional scheduled air and marine transportation routes and the alignment of the trans-Alaska pipeline haul road.

Limitations of the Study

Significant limitations accompany the baseline assessment of transportation

facilities on the North Slope. Information on transportation movement

characteristics and facilities at different communities is often unreliable

and out of date. Much documentation by the State regulatory agencies and

the Borough on facilities at airports and DEW Line stations and on the costs

of movement of people and goods is conflicting. There seems to be no systematic procedure for compilation and reporting of data in the-transportation

sector. Attempts have been made to corroborate data by cross comparison of

source material and by discussion with agency representatives. However,

even the owners and operators of some airports, for exampl<, are unaware of

the size and

Information ~

larger, more

isolated, or

length of thefr airstrips or the support facilities they contain.

n this inventory may be assumed to be reasonably accurate for

accessible communities, such as Barrow, and less reliable for

abandoned settlements such as DEW Line stations.

The following sections summarize the existing air and marine transportation

in the region. The principal routes and facilities are discussed together

with problems or other issues associated with improvement of transportation

services to North Slope communities. Also included is a discussion of

highway transportation issues associated primarily with the trans-Alaska

pipeline haul road.

-i$2-
/ -

\

.

\.

-- ~NE TRANSPORTATION

~AI)? JET ROWE5

● ● ● ● * fiR ~s~ RwTES

\

w 4P ‘\

c) 50 160

D ANCHORAGE

BEAUFORT 5EA REGIONAL- STUDY ● REGIONAL TK/+N5P0KTAT10f’J ROUTE5
BEAUFORT SEA REGION

AIR TRANSPORTATION

TRANSPORTATION

Air Transportation

CURRENT AIR TRANSPORTATION

Because the North Slope has no highway system linking communities (with

the exception of the trans-Alaska pipeline haul road) and its marine

transportation is limited to a short ice-free summer season, the region

is primarily dependent upon air transportation. Regularly scheduled air

service via Wien Air Alaska serves Barrow, Deadhorse, Kaktovik and Anaktuvuk

Pass from Fairbanks, and Point Hope from Kotzebue. Air taxi service exists

for intra-regional service to other communities. The Air Force provides

contract chartered flights to three DEW Line sites as well as Kaktovik

(Barter Island DEW Line), Barrow (NARL), Wainwright and Point Lay, with

public use on a space available basis.

The schedule and fare structure for North Slope corrmuni ties (June 13, 1977

to September 30, 1977)cis shown in Table 3.

Most of the following summarizes information contained in an inventory of

airport facilities prepared for the North Slope Borough in 1975 (Airport

Facilities Study, H.V. Lounsbury & Associates). Facilities are grouped

according to two categories: federal government operated and maintained

airports that” are restricted to military use; and State and privately

operated and maintained airports, serving most villages.

The airports operated by the U.S. Air Force or Navy are generally wellmaintained and better capable of handling larger aircraft under adverse

weather conditions than are public use airports at most villages. Airport

facilities located at active and deactivated DEW Line stations along the

Arctic coast were constructed in the 1950’s. Of the approximately fifteen

sites, five are in active use; four are being used for research; two are

being utilized as logistical bases for exploration of petroleum reserves

in National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska (NPR-A); and the remaining four are

abandoned. The following lists airport facilities at each of these sites.

(Lounsbury & Assoc., 1975; Dept. of the Navy, 1977; Dupere & Assoc., 1974)

-64-
BEAUF~ SEA REGION

TABLE 3

TRANSPORTATIL*

Air Transportation

SCHEDULE AND FARE STRUCTURE FOR NORTH SLOPE COMMUNITIES

(June 13, 1977 to September 30, 1977)

DESTINATION ORIGIN CARRIER AIRCRAFT SCHEDULE ONE-WAY FARE

Barrow Fairbanks Wi en 737-Jet Daily $77.24

Barrow Anchorage Wi en 737-Jet Daily $109.03

Barrow Fairbanks Frontier Flying Service Piper Navajo Chieftan Once a week $123.26

Kaktovik Deadhorse Sea Air Motive Twin Otter 2 dayslwk $67.68

Kaktovik Deadhorse ERA Helicopter 2 days/wk $67.68

9

&

U-I Deadhorse Fairbanks Wien -

737-Jet Daily $77.24 II

Nuiqsut None scheduled - Frontier Flying Service has requested route

Wainwriqht Fairbanks Wi en $96.36

Point Lay Nome Munz Northern Airlines, Nome N/A N/A

Point Hope Nome Munz Northern Airlines, Nome N/A N/A

Anaktuvuk Pass N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

!

Ataksook N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Source: CCC/HOK
.

0gj I.

,

.

I

.

I

●

“1●

/●

/

mx9@@@@@@

(FJ@@@J@@’’J@J@

@a’J@@@(GJ@i$’J

-66-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION TRANSPORTATION

P

Air Transportation

Active Use Stations

Clearance for landing at each of these stations must be obtained in advance

from the DEW station office in Colorado Springs, Colorado.

● Point Lay - 2892 acres

s Gravel airstrip: 3519 feet long x 100 feet wide (certified for

medium size cargo C-124 aircraft)

e Lighting: medium intensity (runway and taxiway)

e Navigational aids: communications tie-in (FSS Kotzebue)

s Wainwri ght (LIZ-3) - 3724 acres

o Gravel airstrip: 3500 feet long x 100 feet wide

s Lighting: runway lights

s Navigational aids: ground to air radio communication, homer beacon

and wind driven measuring equipment

@ Fuel: limited

P

e Barrow - 4541 acres (including NARL)

s Gravel airstrip: 5000 feet long x 150 feet wide (solid steel base

installed in 1964)

a Lighting: runway lights

● Navigational aids: ground to air radio communication, homer beacon

and wind measuring equipment

● Fuel: extensive

@ Buildings: two hangars, storage warehouses, equipment for freight

handling and major repairs

e Q!l!?u (pow-l) - 2830 acres (also used as an oil exploration base camp)

60 miles southeast of Barrow

9 Gravel airstrip: 5200 feet long x 150 feet wide

a Lighting: runway lights

● Navigational aids: ground to air radio cormnunication, homer

beacon, wind measuring equipment, RCA transportable earth station

s Buildings: 90-man base camp

o Fuel: four 420,000 gallon bolted steel airplane fuel tanks (to

be replaced by welded tanks in 1977); 126,000 and 65,000 gallon

welded gasoline tanks

-67-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION TRANSPORTATION

Air Transportation

@ Barter Island (Bar-Main at Kaktovik) - 4359 acres

o Gravel airstrip: 4817 feet long

o Lighting: N/A

● Navigational aids: N/A

@ Buildings: Borough-owned and operated warm storage space

Research Stations

● ICY Cape (LIZ-B) (custody of NPR-A) - 218 acres

Navy research on offshore sand bars

s Gravel airstrips: 2400 feet long x 100 feet wide (recently improved);

2200 feet long x 100 feet wide (poor condition)

s Lighting: runway lights

s Navigational aids: Antenna system

● Buildings: three small deactivated DEW Line buildings (good condition)

● Fuel:limited

o Oliktok (POW-C) - 759 acres

.

40 miles northwest of Prudhoe Bay. NARL (Barrow) research station

e Gravel air strip: 1500 feet long

Fuel: 85,000 gallon diesel storage tank

.

●

● Camden Bay - Brown Low Point (POW-D) - 456 acres

Us.

●

●

●

Fish & Wildlife Research Station

Gravel airstrip: damaged by coastal erosion (roadway landings)

Buildings: three small deactivated DEW buildings

Fuel: tanks capacity 14,000 gallons

● Demarcation Point (POW-E) - Acreage N/A

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Research Station

9 Gravel airstrip: 1800 feet long x 100 feet wide

● Buildings: three small deactivated DEW Line buildings

o Fuel: tanks - 1400 gallon capacity water storage tank and additional supplies in support of wildlife research

-68- ““
BEAUFORT SEA REGION

B

TRANSPORTATION

Air Transportation

Oil Exploration Base Camps

● Lonely (POW-I) (Also Active Use Station) - 2830 acres

9 Cape Sabine (LIZ-A) -431 acres

Industry use for seismic exploration

● Gravel airstrip: 2900 feet long x 100 feet wide (maintained)

● Lighting: not operable

# Buildings: three deactivated DEW buildings, 25 to 30 portable

housing units

o Fuel: four large fuel storage tanks, 65,000 gallon water storage

tank

Abandoned Stations

o Cape Simpson (POW-A) (Custody of NPR-A) - 229 acres

40 miles southeast of Barrow

G Gravel airstrip: 2500 feet long x 100 feet wide (excellent condition)

c Lighting: runway lights

● Navigational aids: Antenna system .

● Buildings: three deactivated DEW Line buildings

● Fuel: four 20,000-gallon steel tanks .

● point Mc~ntyre(po~-c) - l~ofj ac~s

20-40 miles northwest of Prudhoe Bay

● Gravel airstrip: 1636 feet long x 70 feet wide

● Lighting: none

o Navigational aids: none

s Buildings: 3 small deactivated DEW Line buildings

Q Peard Bay (LIZ-C) (Custody of NPR-A) - 1460 acres

55 miles southwest of Barrow

a Gravel airstrip: 1600 feet long x 100 feet wide

● Lighting: runway lights

● Navigational aids: antenna system

o Fuel: none

@ Buildings: one deactivated DEN Line building

-69-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION TRANSPORTATION

Air Transportation

● Kogru Inlet {POW-B) (Custody of NPR-A) - 790 acres

120 miles southeast of Barrow

● Gravel airstrip: 1800 feet long x 75 feet wide

● Flaxman Island - acreage N/A

North of Canning River

o No information available

Public Use Airport Facilities

The second category of airports on the North Slope is related to public

use airports. Facilities at villages are summarized below.

● Anaktuvuk Pass (Owned by BLhl, operated by Wien Air Alaska)

● Gravel airstrip: 4430 feet long x 100 feet wide (poorly graded

and maintained, subject to flooding -- incapable of receiving

large cargo aircraft)

● Lighting: none

● Communications: tie-in FSS (Fairbanks)

● Buildings: none .

● Fuel: none

North Slope Borough’s 1977 Capital Improvements Progr~m indicates that

preliminary planning efforts in coordination with FAA and the State

Division of Aviation should result in improvements of the Anaktuvuk

Pass airport in 1977/78.

● Ataksook (Owned and operated by BLM)

s Turf airstrip: 2000 feet long x 50 feet wide (usable only when

when weather and ground conditions permit)

c No existing facilities

The 1977 North Slope Borough Capital Improvements Program indicates

that Borough funds have been appropriated for design work in application

for funds from State and federal agencies for airport construction.

-70-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION TRANSPORTATION

Air Transportation

● Barrow: Wiley Post/Will Rogers Memorial Airport (owned and operated

by the State of Alaska)

● Paved airstrip: 6500 feet long x 150 feet wide

● Lighting: high intensity, medium intensity taxiway, and apron

lighting

s Navigational aids: FAA VORTAC, FAA UHF, VHF directional finder

o Buildings: new Wien terminal, FAA flight service station,

State Division of Aviation offices, air charter service hangar

● Fuel: limited, charter operations-owned tanks

● Deadhorse (Owned and operated by State Division of Aviation)

o Gravel airstrip: 5000 feet long x 150 feet wide

● Lighting: medium intensity runway and taxiway lights

e Navigational aids: FAA facilities, and radio nav-aid facilities

(FSS Wien antenna, VHF)

● Buildings: terminal, utility-storage shop, power and small

transient camp, and adjacent gravel helipad

@ Fueling: extensive

Improvements, including widening of the airstrip and the installation .

of additional navigational aids, are scheduled by the State. When

completed, operation at the Prudhoe Bay runway will be discontinued.

.

0 Kaktovik (See Barter Island - Bar-Main at Kaktovik, listed above under

DEW Line Active Use Stations)

s Nuiqsut (Owned by BLM)

● Sand airstrip: 2000 feet long x 75 feet wide (capable of receiving

small aircraft such as Twin Otter)

● Lighting and navigational aids: none

This sand airstrip was recently constructed by the State and has been

\ turned over to village ownership. Operation and maintenance is carried

out by the State.

-71-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION TRANSPORTATION

Air Transportation

The North Slope Borough has funded applications to obtain State and

federal funds for construction of additional improvements at the

Nuiqsut airport (1977 Capital Improvements Program). Plans are to

extend the runway to 2500 feet with lighting, and then to 3500 feet

to 4500 feet with an apron and lighting. Expansion to accommodate

Hercules-type cargo aircraft will allow for the airlifting of supplies

and workers for the construction of major community facilities by the

Borough (1974-75 Capital Improvements Program).

o Point Lay (Owned by BLM, operation in public domain)

e Sand airstrip: 600 feet - 800 feet long x 60 feet wide (soft,

unmaintained strip)

● Existing facilities: none

c Point Hope (Owned and operated by Alaska Division of Aviation)

● Gravel airstrip: 4000 feet long x 100 feet wide [maintained

summer and winter, but 800 feet of runway is soft and not

recommended for use)

● Lighting: medium density (runway lights)

● Navigational aids: Conmu.mication tie-in FSS Kotzebud

● Fueling facilities: Emergency only

.

s Prudhoe Bay (Owned by Alaska Div. of Lands, operated byARCO)

e Gravel airstrip: 5500 feet long x 150 feet wide

● Lighting: medium intensity

● Navigational aids: two channel VHF andUHF radio (FAA, ARCO and RCA),

communications tie-in FSS (Fairbanks)

9 Buildings: unknown (several)

● Fueling: N/A

s Umiat (Owned by Alaska Div. of Aviation, privated operated)

a Gravel airstrip: 5470 feet long x 158 feet wide

o Lighting: high intensity runway lights c

e Navigational aids: FAA beacon

● Fueling facilities: none

-72-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION TRANSPORTATION

Air Transportation

● Wainwright (Owned and operated by the State Division of Aviation)

● Gravel airstrip: 2200 feet long x 100 feet wide

● Lighting: low intensity runway lights (city installed and maintained)

● Navigational aids: communications tie-in (FSS Barrow)

o Fueling facilities: none

AIR TRANSPORTATION ISSUES

The dependency of North Slope communities on air service for transportation

and goods movement makes reliable low cost service essential. Significant

air transportation issues include the cost, coverage and frequency of air

service. They also include the need of industry for improved airport

facilities on the Slope.

Oil and Gas Industry Air Transportation Requirements

Oil and gas exploration and development requires the use of large planes

and frequent air service. Air transportation facilities typically require

upgrading in order to respond to the heavier aircraft and incr~ased air

traffic demands of petroleum development.

.

The current oil and gas exploration program in NPR-A is an example of the

immense air transportation service requirements of a drilling program. In

the 1976-77 winter season, fuel and cargo were planned to be shipped by

barge or Hercules aircraft to supply bases at Wainwright, Barrow, the DEW

Line station at Lonely, and Umiat. From these bases, fuel was to be carried

to well locations using rollagon-type vehicles or aircraft. If the transport of fuel were accomplished by aircraft alone, it would require approximately 100 flights just to serve the fuel requirements (500,000 to 600,000

gallons) of one medium-depth well (10,000 to 12,000 feet). A ten-day

fuel supply of 70,000 gallons is maintained at the test site for 24-hour

per day drilling operations.

Although airlifting of fuel is more costly than barge transport

tical bases, aircraft are occasionally used for this purpose in

to the logisorder to

-73-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION TRANSPORTATION

Air Transportation

provide direct service from Fairbanks to the well sites.

Government agencies that have a role in responding to industry requirements

for improved air transportation include State Division of Aviation and

the North Slope Borough. The Division of Aviation is taking a reactive

stance to impacts arising from OCS activities on State-owned and maintained”

airport facilities. That is, the Division will respond to private sector

decisions rather than attempt to anticipate them (Harry Shawbach, Acting

Director,, State Division of Aviation).

Other than maintaining existing airport facilities at current levels, the

Division of Aviation’s primary role in responding to OCS activities would

be to make available for lease to private industry undeveloped land surrounding an airport. Industry uses of this Iand would include expansion

of existing apron and servicing areas, construction of enclosed hangars,

and as corridors to bring in needed utilities. The Division will try to

restrict warehousing activities to privately owned land near an airport.

In some instances, industry has constructed new airstrips and upgraded navigational equipment (e.g., Deadhorse and Yakataga). .

The Borough has no official position regarding airport development to meet

industry needs. The City of Barrow has set aside land south of the Stateowned airport for industrial development. A study was conducted in 1975

for the Borough which inventoried airport and other facilities at abandoned

DEW Line stations on the North Slope, and identified procedures by which the

Borough could potentially acquire the sites from the General Services Agency

(H. V. Lounsbury & Associates). If OCS oil and gas development base camps

were required at locations along the Arctic coast, the potential would

appear to exist for the Borough to obtain certain abandoned DEW stations

for lease to oil companies for use as base camps.

-74- .
BEAUFORT SEA REGION TRANSPORTATION

Marine Transportation

MARINE TRANSPORTATION

From the days of their earliest settlement, North Slope communities were

oriented toward the sea. The Taremiut Eskimo were dependent upon the sea

for food and skins of sea mammals. With the coming of commercial whaling

in the mid-nineteenth century, trade was established with the western world

which encouraged migration from inland Nunamiut settlements to communities

such as

replace

1977) .

Barrow. New dependencies on commercial goods gradually began to

trading between coastal and inland Eskimos (U.S. Dept. of the Navy,

CURRENT MARINE TRANSPORTATION

Shipments of goods to Barrow have continued ever since the advent of commercial whaling. World War II liberty ships have given way to sea-going barges

for delivery of cargo in Alaska, with the sole exception of the liberty ship

“Northstar III,” operated by the Bureau of Indian Affairs to serve northwest and North Slope communities.

Today, marine transportation to the Arctic consists of annual trips by the

Northstar III, and more frequent use of barges to supply specialized petroleum development operations. The cargo ship and ocean-going barges are

offloaded onto shallow- and medium-draft ships and barges for lightening to

shore. Barges presently offer the best means of transporting heavy cargo

such as fuel and fuel tanks, tractors, drilling mud, and pipe and casing,

as well as prefabricated housing and entire modular petroleum development

camps. Smaller craft are occasionally used to shuttle cargo to some areas

where there are no port facilities. Barges have served the needs of oil

exploration in NPR-A during the last 20 years (U.S. Dept. of the Navy,

October 1975). The NARL base at Barrow serves as a storage site for fuel

(2,385,000-gal lon capacity). Transfer of JP-5 airplane fuel and gasoline

from offshore

Operations at

lightening of

fuel barges is carried out using a 6-inch flexible line.

Prudhoe Bay require unloading from sea-going barges and

freight for six miles with smaller barges to reach the unloading

-75-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION TRANSPORTATION

Marine Transportation

dock. Port facilities at Prudhoe Bay were built in 1969. A gravel causeway

and four barges placed at the end of it serve as the unloading dock. Adjacent

to the dock is a 25-acre gravel pad storage area. Three heavy cranes are

stationed at the dock for unloading cargo. A road connects the port to the

principle camp facilities and airport approximately 4miles to the south,

and to the Deadhorse airport approximately 9 miles to the south. A second

dock, 5,000 feet long and 50 feet wide, was built at Prudhoe Bay during

the winter of 1975/1976.

In addition to cargo ship service to coastal communities, the government

contracts for barges to serve the DEW Line stations, the NARL Facility at

Barrow, NPR-A oil exploration, and Prudhoe Bay oil development requirements.

Most ports of embarkation are in Washington State or California, with Seattle

being the primary port for Alaska.

In 1968, 5,714 short tons of cargo were shipped to the North Slope, most of

which went to Barrow (Parker, 1972). With the beginning of oil development

at Prudhoe Bay, that figure rose dramatically to 91,089 s.t. in 1969 and

175,000 s.t. in 1970. Only a small portion of this freight n~rmally comes

from intra-state ports; apparently in 1969 only 4,000 tons were transshipped to Prudhoe Bay from Anchorage (ibid.).

.0

Water transport is the most economical method of transporting heavy bulk

materials to the North Slope. The principle advantage of air transport

over barge transport is its speed and capability of serving innnediate needs.

Barge traffic, however, usually requires costly storage of large quantities

of materials until needed. Barges are also more prone to accidents, and

insurance rates

Even with these

oil development

for barges in Alaska are among the highest in the world.

limitations, however, barge transport remains essential to

operations. During the North Slope exploration boom in

1968-69, water transport was passed over in favor of air, but a shift was

made to waterborne commerce at the earliest opportunity, in the summer of

1969 (ibid.). The 90,000 tons of freight, including buildings, drilling

cement and mud and fuel oil shipped during that summer, were stockpiled at

-76-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION TRANSPORTATION

Marine Transportation

Prudhoe Bay. As a result, air freight requirements were

and Hercules-type aircraft were largely removed from the

cut drastically,

North Slope during

1969/70.

For lighter

shipment by

or airmail,

and less bulky materials, shipment by water to Anchorage, or

water or truck to Fairbanks, and then transfer to airfreight

may be feasible because of the high cost of lightening (estimated

at 26 percent of ocean freight rates). A combination of air and water

shipping seems to be rate competitive with existing all-weather routing, is

quicker and reduces the necessity of monitoring large inventories at

destinations.

MARINE TRANSPORTATION ISSUES

Issues of continuing importance

portation in the Arctic include

to the use and development of marine transbarge support for continuing oil exploration

of NPR-A, and the feasibility of developing deepwater ports (particularly in

support of oil exploration and development) along the 13eaufort Sea coast.

NPR-A Oil Exploration .

Plans for continuing oil exploration in NPR-A will utilize ports at Barrow,

and the DEW Line stations at Lonely and Wainwright. The NARL base at Barrow

was the primary base for the 1944-53 exploration program, and will be used

for supply of exploration of the northwestern portion of NPR-A during the

current program. The Lonely station, approximately 80 miles southeast of

Barrow, is an important offloading site for airplane fuel and gasoline serving

exploratory activities in the eastern portion of NPR-A. The DEW Line site

LIZ-3, on Wainwright Inlet, could also be used because it is ice-free for

a longer period each summer than either Barrow or Lonely.

Supplies brought to these locations by barge are transported overland by allterrain vehicles in winter, a maximum of approximately 50 miles. Alternatively,

cargo may be airlifted to ice airstrips at inland camps.

-77-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION TRANSPORTATION

Marine Transportation

Port Development

For many years there has been interest in developing deep draft ports at

communities along the Arctic coast.- With the continued exploration and development of oil and gas reserves on the North Slope, that interest has increased.

A number of problems, however, are inherent in barge traffic and port development on the Arctic coast. These limitations include:

1)

2)

3)

4)

5)

Limited ice-free summer season, resulting in inactive use

of barges during the iced-in winter season;

Shallow coastal waters, requiring lightening of cargo from

deeper waters to shore;

Absence of port facilities;

Lack of good offloading areas and safe anchorages; and

Potential adverse environmental impacts of port and causeway

construction on fish and marine mammals.

Provision of a deep draft harbor at Barrow or other Iocations.along the coast

does not seem feasible, because all protected anchorages are shallow and

have poorly defined entrances. It is believed that high investments in

dredging operations and creation of a causeway-breakwater ~annot obviate the

needs for Iightering of cargo via medium-draft (20 foot) boats at any prospective port location (Parker, 1972).

-78-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION TRANSPORTATION

Highway Transportation

HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION

CURRENT HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION .

The only inter-regional highway in the Arctic is the trans-Alaska pipeline

North Slope haul road. This road was constructed parall’el to the alignment

of the oil pipeline for its construction and maintenance.

The agreement under which the haul road was built required the State of

Alaska to obtain the necessary permits from the federal government for construction, and the Alyeska Pipeline Service Company to build the road (to

secondary highway standards), and turn it over to the State upon completion

of the pipeline.

It was assumed that when the State secured over $27 million of federal funds

for project construction and the route was placed on the Federal Aid Highway

System, that the road would be opened for public use. However, the current

State administration has questioned the wisdom of immediate unrestricted

public use of the road as well as the long term public subsidy of a facility

used for the benefit of a few (Alaska Consultants, 1976). Co~sequently,

the Governor has instituted a planning study to determine appropriate uses

of the haul road. .

HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION ISSUES

The important issues related to future highway transportation in the region

include interim use and long term use of the trans-Alaska pipeline haul road.

Initial use of the road will probably relate to continued oil and gas

industry requirements. In September 1976, the Governor adopted an interim

policy for continued use by industrial and mining interests. User fees

wou?d be charged for road maintenance. The policy would remain in effect

until industrial demands have diminished. Depending on when construction of

a gas pipeline is completed, this policy could be continued until ,the mid1980’s (Alaska Consultants, 1976).

-79-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION TRANSPORTATION

Highway Transportation

Future oil and gas development within the State’s territorial waters is

expected to rely much less on air transportation than earlier onshore

development. The State Division of Policy and Development Planning predicts

that the trans-Alaska pipeline haul road can more efficiently handle transport

of bulk materials than air transport (Alaska, Office of the Governor, 1975).

Longer lead times associated with Beaufort Sea development will allow for

planning of shipments via waterborne or truck-carried cargo.

The potential for public use of the road once the Alyeska Company transfers

its ownership and maintenance to the State has yet to be determined. The

timing of the State nearshore leasing program, the federal offshore leasing

program, and the proposed natural gas pipeline, could place heavy demands

on the haul road. In a recent statement, Interior Secretary Andrus expressed his opinion that “it may be desirable to use the road exclusively

for construction purposes” if Congress approves a proposed pipeline to

bring natural gas from the Nor+h Slope to the Lower 48 (Anchorage Daily

News, November 3, 1977). If the road were to be opened to public use as

well, there could be a shift to greater dependence on waterborne transportation to serve the needs of any or all of these projects.

These issues are being considered in the Governor’s study~f the haul road.

The study program is divided into two phases. The first phase, to be completed in July 1977 by the Alaska Department of Highways, the Joint FederalState Land Use Planning Commission and the Bureau of Land Management, is

focused on a series of questions (Alaska, Office of the Governor, 1977).

1) What land use pattern do you envision developing in Northern

Alaska? How do these uses relate to alternative State policies

for the haul road?

2) What type of overall transportation network appears best for

Northern Alaska? Does the haul road fit into this network?

-80-
BEAUFORT SEA REGION TRANSPORTATION

Highway Transportation

3) What haul road usage is implied by each of the three proposed

gas pipelines? Is general public usage likely to prove incompatible with commercial usage once one of these projects is

underway?

4) What problems should the State anticipate if general public usage

is allowed? For example, are ATV’S (All-terrain vehicles) likely

to become a significant problem? If so, how could the State best

cope with this potential problem?

Also needed are:

5) Current and projected use of the haul road to support the

complete development of the Prudhoe Bay oil field;

6) Cost to operate and maintain the haul road for the above use;

7) State policies on who should pay for maintenance and operation; and

8) Alternative methods or sources of funding number 7.

The Phase II long-term work program is to be completed by January 1, 1978,

and will be carried out by the North Slope Borough; State Departments of

Community and Regional Affairs, Fish and Game, Natural Resources, Office of

the Governor, Division of Policy Development, and the University of Alaska

Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center; the Joint Federal-State

Land Use Planning Commission, the Bureau of Indian Affair>, Bureau of Mines,

Geological Survey, Parks Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, Forest Service,

Outer Continental Shelf Office, and other federal agencies. This baseline

inventory is one component of that studies program.

Among the other study components to be undertaken by these agencies are a

tentative land use plan for the region; possible transportation networks,

ports and harbors; and federal, State and Borough policies on mineral development, wildlife, subsistence, new communities, employment, tourism, community

facilities, etc. The final recommendation on use of the haul road is to

be made in the context of this Arctic Policy framework.

-81-
D

BEAUFORT SEA REGION TRANSPORTATION

Highway Transportation

Meanwhile, the Office of the Governor is examining various options for

the haul road. As deliberation continues, October 1, 1978 remains the

date that the State, under terms of the agreement it makes with the Alyeska

Pipeline Service Company, will take possession of the road.

.

.

-82-
B

BEAUFORT SEA

COMMUNITY CONTACTS

COMMUNITY CONTACTS

Bartel, Herbert. Planning Director, North Slope Borough

Burns, John. Biologist, Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Anchorage.

Hopson, Eben. Mayor, North Slope Borough.

Hopson, Flossfe. Historic and Archaeologic Resources Planner, North Slope

Borough.

Lecky, Jim. Assistant Coordinator of Marine Mammals, National Marine Fisheries

Service, Los Angeles.

Maze, David. Administrator, BP Alaska, Inc.

Moody, James E. Chief Planning Engineer, Alaska Div. of Aviation, Anchorage.

Neakok, Billy. Director, Div.

.

of Conservation and Environmental Security,

North Slope Borough.

.

Reitmeier, Paul. Manager, Industrial Marketing, RCA Alascom, Anchorage.

-83-
B

BEAUFORT SEA

BIBLIOGRAPH Y

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Alaska. Dept. of Natural Resources.

plan (1976-1980). Anchorage,

Alaska. Dept. of Natural Resources.

Archaeology. Alaska heritage

3 v.

----- Alaska outdoor recreation plan

126 p.

Div. of Parks. Alaska outdoor recreation

September 1976.

Div. of Parks. Office of History and

resources 1973-1983. Anchorage, July 1976:

(1976-1980). Juneau, September 1976.

----- Policy for the Arctic and the haul road study plan, 1977.

B

Alaska. Office of the Governor. Div. of Policy Development and Planning.

Draft environmental assessment of the proposed Beaufort sea nearshore

petroleum leasing. Juneau, April 4, 1975, 2 v.: 491 p.

.

Alaska, University. Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center. Native

Alaska

Alaska

land use and place name maps of Arctic Alaska. Anchorage, 1975: two

1:500,000 scale maps

.

Consultants, Inc. North Slope Borough: issues overview. Anchorage,

December 1976: 49 p.

International Academy. North Slope Borough

fiscal 1974/75 - 1979/80. Anchorage, 1974:

Anchorage Daily News. “Andrus skeptical on opening

capital improvements

209 p.

haul road. FJovember

program,

7, 1977.

Dupere and Associates. North Slope Borough manpower development and corrnnunity

D

survey .reports. Juneau, 1974: 183 p.

----- North Slope Borough reconnaissance study - an inventory of the borough

and its communities. Juneau, October 1973: 132 p.

-84-
D

BEAUFORT SEA BIBLIOGRAPHY

Hewitt V. Lounsbury & Associates. Airport facilities study for the North

Slope Borough. Anchorage, 1975: 1 v.

----- Inventory of abandoned distant early warning stations. Prepared for

North Slope Borough. Anchorage, 1975: 27 p.

----- Nuiqsut townsite composite plan - map prepared for North Slope Borough.

Anchorage, 1977.

ITT Arctic Services, Inc. Military water use at distant early warning radar

sites and the Naval Arctic

Johnson and Dryer. Village water

Research Laboratory. n.d.

use in arctic Alaska. 1977, in press.

Joint Federal-State Land Use Planning Commission. Tentative recommendations

for national interest lands (d-2) in Alaska. Anchorage, 1976: 20 p.

McCabe, Janet. Joint Federal-State Land Use Planning Commission draft position

paper. Anchorage, 1977.

Neakok, Billy. Letter to Secretary of the Interior Cecil Andr~s. Barrow,

May 25, 1977.

North Slope Borough. Draft 1977 capital improvements program - Nuiqsut Village

project schedule. Barrow, 1977: 13 p.

----- 1977 capital improvements program revision. Barrow, 1977: 9 p.

----- Arctic coastal zone management newsletter. February 19770

----- Navy sets lower consumer rates for gas from South Barrow field. The Arctic

Coastal Zone Management Newsletter. January 1977.

-85-
BEAUFORT SEA

Parker, Walter B. and others. Survey report--northwest Alaska economic and

transportation prospects. Fairbanks, University of Alaska, Institute

Social, Economic and Government Research, 1972: 186 p.

Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., and others. Alaska OCS socioeconomic studies

program, literature survey. Anchorage, April 1977: 476 p.

of

Resource Planning Associates. The exploration, development and production of

Naval petroleum reserve no. 4. Washington, U.S. Federal Energy

Administration, contract no. CR-05-60579-00, 1976: 1976.

Richardson, Jeffery. Subsistence understanding is lacking. Tundra Times

(Fairbanks), May 18, 1977.

Schneider, William and P. Bowers. Assessment of the known cultural resources

of the national petroleum reserve in Alaska. Fairbanks, Cooperative

Park Studies Unit, University of Alaska, 1977. Manuscript.

Skladel, George W.

.

Coastal boundaries of Naval petroleum reserve no. 4.

Fairbanks, University of Alaska Sea Grant Program. Report 73-12, 1973.

.

U.S. Dept. of the Army. Corps of Engineers. Draft environmental impact

statement - offshore oil and gas development - the Alaskan arctic coast.

Anchorage, 1975.

U.S. Dept. of the Interior. Alaska natural gas transportation system, final

environmental impact statement - Alaska volume and alternatives volume.

blashington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., March 1976: 2 v.

----- Final environmental impact statement - proposed Arctic national wildlife

refuge. Anchorage, 1974: 668 p.

-86-
BEAUFORT SEA

D

BIBLIOGRAPHY

U.S. Dept. of the Interior. Bureau of Land Management. Reservation of easements

pursuant to Section 17(b) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act

(ANCSA). Anchorage, February 1976.

----- Reservation of easements for the transportation of energy, fuel and natural

resources pursuant to Section 17(b) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement

Act (ANCSA). Anchorage, March 1976.

U.S. Dept. of the Interior. Fish and Uildlife Service. Minter water availability and use conflicts as related to fish and wildlife in arctic

Alaska - a synthesis of information. Anchorage, 1977: 222 p.

U.S. Dept. of the Navy. Final environmental impact statement: continuing

exploration and evaluation of naval petroleum reserve no. 4, Alaska.

B

Washington, Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserve Office, 1977: 400 p.

----- Final environmental impact statement, continuing exploration and evaluation

of NPR-4, Alaska (Zone “A”). October, 1975: 346 p. .

Urban and Rural Systems Associates. An analysis of the socioeconomic impact in

Alaska of the Ala.$kan Arctic Gas Pipelfne Company pipeli~e. San

Francisco, January 1974: 360 p.

Wentworth, Cynthia. The quandry over subsistence areas. Anchorage Daily News,

April 19, 1977.

Williams, Andy. The subsistence battle quietly rages. Alaska Advocate

(Anchorage), May 26, 1977.

-87-
Barrow Community Study

.

.
D

BARRON

INTRODUCTION

INTRODUCTION

The community of Barrow is the northernmost settlement in the United States.

It is located approximately 350 miles north of the Arctic Circle on a point

of land which separates the Chukchi Sea on the west from the Beaufort Sea

on the east. The community is entirely surrounded by the huge National

Petroleum Reserve-Alaska (NPR-A).

Barrow is comprised of two largely separate settlements: the City of Barrow

and the Naval Arctic Research Laboratory (NARL), separated by a three-mile

long coastal road. Barrow is a native community of approximately 2,300

persons who still rely heavily upon subsistence as well as upon federal

and Borough government and Native corporation employment. The NARL camp

is comprised of approximately 70 to 90 persons, most of whom are white males

who are employed in Arctic research, communications or military defense

activities sponsored by the federal government or the University of Alaska.

Each community has its own airport, housing and services, although the City

is increasingly providing more services for both.

.

Historic patterns of settlement along the Arctic coast were based upon

subsistence harvesting of sea mammals. Small bands of Taremiut, or coastal

Eskimo peoples, hunted and fished and traded with the more nomadic Nunamiut,

or inland Eskimos, who hunted the caribou. The traditional village of

Utkiakuik was located at the present site of Barrow. It was formed by consolidation of several Taremiut settlements scattered along the coast.

In 1826, Captain Frederick W. Beechey, a British explorer, landed at Point

Barrow, which he named in honor of his friend, Sir John Barrow. But it

not until 1848, when the first extensive commercial whaling began, that

changes began to take place which affected the Taremiut as well as the

Nunamiut Eskimos.

gradually replaced

October 1968). In

in search of their

Taremiut trading of commercial goods with the whalers

was

.

trading with the inland Nunamiut (Federal Field Committee,

consequence, the Nunamiut were forced to move to the coast

central supplies.

-88-
+:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:+:.:.:-:+:.:+:.:.:.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

‘:+:+:+:+: ‘....., . . . .. ...... ..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:::<

..............4....

.:;$

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

:.:+:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:<

d

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...>... %.:.:.>>>> >>:-;.> >>J3> >s>.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

!!!!

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. :.:.:.:.: -:+:.:+: +:+: +:.:.:.:.:. :.:.:.:.:.: .:.:+x .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . u-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.. . . . . .. . . .. . . . .%%%..% . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . ...-.......=%%.. %....-.%. . ..-.......%.. . . . . . . . . . . %..%% . . . .. . . . . . . .

.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . ..-.....%.. . . . ...%.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..,.%% . . . . . . $i .W.....%. .. . . . . . . . . . .. . ...%.... . . . . . . . .. . . . ... . :.:.:.:.:.:.:.~.>~. :.:.:.:.:.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...%%%..%%..%.. . :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.

.. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .

-:+:.:.: .:+:+:. :.:.:.:.:.x..

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . .. . .. . ... ... . .. . .. . “. . .. . .. . .. .“. ... ... .. . .. ... ... ..

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . .

:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.x.:.:.:.:.:.:.: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...%....%....%%%% . . . . .

. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...%..%. +:.:+:+: +:+:.:. :.:+:+:.:. :.:.:.

%....%......%. . .. . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . .

. ... . . .. . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . ... .. . . .. . . . . . :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.x.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. %....%..%%. .%%% . ...%% . ...% . .... .. . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .

%..%....%%%% .. . . . . . . . . . . . .... ... .

. :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:...

:.:.:.:.:.:.w.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.”/:.: . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . .. . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . ...%....%%..%%............%.. ,

%..=%%%. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . .

. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . ...%%.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...% . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . ...%.. . . . ...-...%. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . %%%. ...%%-.%.. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .%......7 . ....... .......

.......... ....................................%%..% ........%

. ......... . .. ........%%... . . .... . ... . . . .... . .. .. .. . . . . . ....

.... ...... .... ............%...... ............ .............. ...

%..= . .. . %%..%.... . ..... . . .......... ... . . . . . . .. .. ... . .. . .. ....

........... .. .. ... .. .. . . .. .. . .... .. .. . .... . . . . .. . .. .. .. .... ..........

..... .. .. .. .. . ....... .. .. . . . . . ... .. . . . ... .. ........ ..... . .. . . ... . .. ...

.......... ................ ....,.%....%..%............................

........ . .. .. . ..%%%7.%., .. ..-.-.-.... . .... . . . .. .. .... . . ...... ....

:.:.x.:. :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. :.:.:.:.:.

:y::~y.:~::::~

8

. . .. . . . . . ...% . . . . . . ..%-.%...>> :.:9>;.;.:;.3::-

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . ... . . .. . . . . . . . . . ... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . ...%.... . . . . . . . %%%%% . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . %..%%.. %%....%......-.%.. . . . . . . .

:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: . .

.. . . . . . . .

.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.. . . . . .

JiIkJi., . . . . . ..$ . . . ...%-.%%....%.. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . % ..%...... . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..%-..... . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..%..%%%..-...%..%%.. %........%., / . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..%..%..% . ...%%..- . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . @ . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.:::::::::::

.. .. .. ..% .. . . ..%-.-.%% %%%% . . . . . ...% .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . %-...-... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..- . . . . . f

.%%%%......%%. . .. . . . . .. .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. .. . . .-.-.%...+.. . ::.:+:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:...: .:7

+:+:.:+:+:+:+:.:-:.:.:. :::: %%%.,.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . .

:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: .-:

::::::::::::: y$$:::j:::.+. .

I

.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:. -... ;:::j;yj~::. .. :: :.:.x.:.:.

. . . . . . .

:.:.:.:.*.:

. . . . . .

.. . .. : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .::

. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..::

.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

\

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .

. .. . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . ..

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...%% . . . . . . . ...%....

.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:- :

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . .. . . .. . . .../.. . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . +:.:+ :+:+:.: X-x.:.: .:.:.:.:.:.:.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. ...-.%% . . . . ... . . . . . . ...%% . . . . . . . . . . . .%..

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

....%%....%%%........%.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...

:.~.:.:.*.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:,:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.-.:.:. .

.:.:.:.:+: .:+:.:.:.:.:.:.:,

. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . ..%-. -... -...-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. ...%....%% .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Q

. . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :.:.:.:.

. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .- . . . ..- .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...,:.:

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . %%%-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.. . . . . ..% . ...%..% . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. ... . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .

. . ... . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. ...%.... .. . .. . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. .. . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . ...%. . . . . . . . . . . . ..%..%% . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .

. .. ...%....%%%.. % . .. .. .....%%%.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..: . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . s

=..- . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . ..%%%% -...% %%%%%% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V:q=..>: .:.:.:.

:.:.:.:.:.:.x.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..%..... :

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .. ... . . . . . . . . -

. . . . . . . ...%... . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . ... . .. . .. . . . ... . .. . .. . . . ... . .. . .. . . .... ... . . .. . .. ... ... . . .. . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . %..-...v. . . ..v. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . h

..:.:.:.:.:.:.:. ...%..%., .:.:.~.:.>:..%. .:.:.:.:.: ...%.. .:...%%...%... .. . +?. ...%.. .

-

.

-%%- ,:::::::::::::..

ii!

+:+x+:.:.:. .

. . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...%..%..........%... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .:~y::~::.:. .

. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... ... ... .. ... ... .. . .. ...:. . “. ... ‘. .. ... . . .. . . ..-. .... ... .. ..... -. ..... .. .... .. .. . . . . . .

..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:

. . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. ... .. ,.. .. ... . . . . . . . . . . . %..%%..%. ...%....%%.. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. : .x.:.:.:.:.:.:. :.:.:.:.: . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...?..... . . . . . . ..... ..... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

:.:.:.%.: . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . ...%. . . . . . . . . .

. ........=.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... .. ....... .. .. ... ... -. . ... ... ... ... .-. . .. . ..

$

. . . . ..%..%... . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .... . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . .. . ... . . . .. . . . ... . . . .. . . . ... . . . . . .. .. “ . . . . . - . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . .:.: . . . ..==--------

. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . - . .

. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. ... . .. . .. . .-. ... .. . ‘. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . ... .. . .. . .. . ... ... . .. . .. . ... ... .. . . . . . .. ....... .. .. .. .. ....... .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..

\

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .

%%

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . %:..

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .::. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . %... .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . ..%....%. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . ...\.... . . . . . . . .

. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-.%-.. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...3. .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................

\

. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .../... . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .............

. . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............. .............. .

..:::..

. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . ................................ ..

.. . ... . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......................................

.. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............ .................... ...

. . .. .. . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............................... ..... .../,..

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................................... ....

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...................-.........../...... ,.,k

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................................... .... .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . . .... . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ... . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... .......................... ..... ..: . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ ..................... ........ .. ... . . . . . . .. . .. . .. . .. . . . .. . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . .. . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . . . . . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . . . ... . .. . . . .. . . ......................................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . ... . ... . . . . .. . . .. . . ... . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . ... .... . . ... . . . . . . ..... . . . . . .. . . . ............................................. .

\

:2-:..

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

t-:-x-x.: .:-:-. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

::::::::::::~::::::::..- .

!,!.:.!.-.!................ .......

\

t

r

i

->>>>> >:;.:.:->> x-x.x+: .:.:.x.x .:

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . #- l!

\_.r-.L

.

f

,K-?:-x.x+>;

. . . . . . . . . . . .—.—.—.—.—.

k.. .. . . .

:=.

L .—

.

(“.

.)

/

—.

—-

-89-
BARROW INTRODUCTION

The first U.S. government research installation at Barrow was a polar station

for meteorological and magnetic research, built in 1881 approximately 1/2

mile northeast of Barrow. Additional federal employment resulted from

petroleum exploration in NPR-4 in the early 1940’s as well as from construction of a DEW Line station in the early 1950’s. The Naval Arctic Research

Laboratory was built in 1947 near the site of this first oil exploration

base camp. Its airstrip was built along the beach in 1944, and resurfaced

with solid steel planking in 1964. The state airport in Barrow was built

in the early 1960’s.

In 1959 Barrow was incorporated as a fourth class city with a seven-man

council. In 1972 the Alaska Legislature made it a second-class city.

The population of Barrow grew from 950 in 1950, to 1300 in 1960, to 2100 in

1970. By 1973 it had grown to 2400 (John Graham & Co., 1973), and by July

D

of 1975 Barrow’s population had declined to 2141 (North Slope Borough, 1976).

No explanation is given for this decline. A slight rise to 2167 was shown

in 1974, with projections to 2330 in fiscal year 1976/77 (Alaska International

Academy, 1974). .

-90-
BARROW LAND USE

LAND USE

The community of Barrow is comprised of the city itself and various federal

government activities grouped around the Naval Arctic Research Laboratory,

located north of the city. The principal land uses in the city consist of

two residential areas: Browervi?le to the north of Isatkoak Lagoon, and

the older part of the city to the south of the lagoon (See Figure 1, Barrow

Area Land Use). The lower or westward portion of the lagoon is used as a

sewage outfall for the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) school located adjacent

to the lagoon in the older part of the city. A dam is being built across

the upper portion of the lagoon by the Public Health Service (PHS) to contain

the city’s principal water source.

Within the older part of Barrow are located most of the governmental and

commercial facilities in the city. Federal governmental functions include

the BIA school, the PHS hospitai, the Weather Service, the new Post Office,

and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) at the State-owned airport.

North Slope Borough facilities include the new administration building, the

City’s electrical generators and electrical distribution syste~, Inupiat

University and a movie theatre. Commercial land use in the older part of

the city includes the new Artic Slope Regional Corporation=owned supermarket/

department store and the Top of the World Hotel, Schontz’s general merchandise

store, a gas station and smaller commercial activities which operate out of

individual homes. Block “A” and Block “B” are designated as residential and

industrial expansion areas of the city respectively.

South of the airport are located the FAA airport navigational aids site

(VORTAC), and RCA Al ascom Earth Satel 1 i te Communi cations Station, and the

community’s second water source, Lake Emaiksoun.

Within the Naval Arctic Research Laboratory (NARL) tract are located the

following federal government activities: the Air Force POW Main DEW Line

Station, the NASA Weather Rocket Launch Facility, the Coast Guard

-91-
BARROW LAND USE

conanunications station at NARL, and FAA antennae complex and the research

laboratory itself. The NARL facility is sponsored by the Office of Naval

Research (ONR) as a support station for applied scientific research throughout the Arctic. Its activities are-housed in approximately 175 small

buildings. It is staffed by personnel of the University of Alaska. This

report refers to the laboratory and all the governmental facilities included

in the 4,500-acre Navy tract as “NARL”.

.

.

-92-
BARROW LAND USE

Residential Land Use

RESIDENTIAL LAND USE

CURRENT RESIDENTIAL LAND USE -

Residential land use in Barrow consists of the older housing area south of

Isatkoak Lagoon; the relatively newer housing of Browerville, north of the

Lagoon; and camp housing at NARL. Within the 200 acres of built-up land

area in Barrow, including Browerville, residential land use comprises approximately 85 acres, or 42 percent of the land area (see Figure 2, Land Use).

No comprehensive surveys of housing have been undertaken in Barrow since 1974.

A new survey would be required to document the current condition of older

housing as well as the condition and tenure of newly constructed units.

According to the Borough Planning Director, there are approximately 500

dwelling units in Barrow. Recently constructed housing (since 1973) consists

of single-family, multi-family and teacher housing. This new housing includes:

54 single-family units; and 40 multi-family units which are arrayed in

buildings of 28 units, 12 units (four-plex) and 9 units. The four-plex units

are for Barrow teacher housing, ultimately planned for 20 units. The only

.

non-governmental multi-family structures of more than two units in the Borough

exist at Barrow.

.

Most new housing has been constructed in the Browerville area. Of the 58

units occupied by the federal and State personnel (URSA, 1974), most are

located here. The lots and houses are larger and more costly than those in

the southern part of Barrow. The new housing lots are generally 50 feet wide

by 125 feet long (John Graham & Company, May 1973). Most of the newer housing

was designed and built outside of the region and shipped by barge to Barrow.

Consequently, floor plans favor arrangements of bedrooms (usually two),

living, dining and kitchen areas more typically found elsewhere in the

country. Because of the larger size and higher purchase price and heating

costs of these homes,

Housing Conditions

Housing conditions in

no exhaustive surveys

some remain unoccupied.

Barrow are among the poorest in the region. Although

of housing have been undertaken since the Dupere &

Associates study in 1974, much of the information for the older housing

-93-
J

>:::: .: ::: ,: .,: ,:; G“ \

?-

.4+k

#’-

/

G3 .

% /

,: ;::

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...

. . . . . . . . ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ..

~ *!$%_& /“

4 ‘- ● . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~~~:! >4.= ‘s+%’” ~

.. .. . .. . . . . .

—

‘++2.

L

%

%

- 7

t %

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .:::::8 ::::::::::::::::: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..!...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .~;:;;;;::;;;;;};{;:;;~;;:

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Soulwz: WwRcw RR&IowbL :::::::::::::::::::::::: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MMmawLM lq73 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$KAu= 11’4 MMS

13ARFKX+l COMMUNITY 5TUD’ ● 13ARROW AREA LAND U5E
BARROW LAND USE

Residential Land Use

remains valid. The Dupere study describes severe conditions of housing

deterioration, inadequate insulation, together with high costs of heating,

maintenance and renovation. The fact that these conditions resulted in a

high vacancy rate (16%) at the same time that existing dwellings were

severely overcrowded, is testimony to the extreme inadequacy of much of

the housing.

A typical house is a single story wood frame structure of one or two rooms.

It is constructed either on a gravel pad or upon pilings driven into the

permafrost. Differential settlement caused by inadequate foundations can

be seen in some cases. The roof framing is usually sheathed with wood planks

over which galvanized corrugated metal is laid to provide a slip surface for

snow.

The single-family units are built on small lots, often with little space

between dwellings or between dwellings and the street. Although construction

of a new fire department has alleviated some of the danger, the proximity

of houses creates dangerous conditions of fire safety.

.

A typical dwelling is small, averaging 725 square feetl The construction

of newer, larger housing since 1974 would skew this average, but the figure

still describes the typical older housing of most of the village. Although

the borough average house size is even smaller (630 square feet), the

occupancy rate of Barrow housing was 5.64 persons per dwelling unit, the

highest in the borough. The most frequent complaint of Barrow residents

about their housing in 1974 was overcrowding.

The harsh climate makes habitation difficult and causes rapid deterioration

of housing. Dupere reported that Barrow homes were the most poorly insulated

in the borough. Twenty-five percent had either no insulation in the ceiling

or walls, and 38’ percent had none in the floors. The slip surface of the

corrugated metal roof eliminates snow build-up, but often contributes to

even greater heat loss.

-95-
BARROW LAND USE

Residential Land Use

Utilities service to older housing is almost nonexistent. No housing has

piped-in water supply. Seventy-nine percent of the units in 1974 had no

shower/bathtub, or combination. Even fewer have installed sinks. Although

some units have flush toilets, all sewage is collected and disposed of by

dumping into “honey buckets”, for periodic pick up by tank trucks.

RESIDENTIAL LAND USE ISSllES

A continuing demand for new housing exists i.n Barrow. The need arises not

only from deterioration and overcrowding of the’existing housing stock, but

from population growth in the community as well. The provision of new

housing, perhaps more than any other factor, will determine the basic

growth patterns of the community.

Deteriorated Housing, ~

The number of housing units in deteriorated or dilapidated condition has

been variously estimated by several agencies and consultants. The 1973

Regional Master Plan reported that 250 dwelling units, or 60 percent of all

housing, was in need of major repair; and that at least 30 houses were in

need of immediate replacement. Extrapolating upon a 1969 ASHA study, the

Master Plan speculated that as many as 80 units could be dilapidated and

.

in need of replacement. By contrast, the 1974/75 to 1979/80 Capital

Improvements Plan (CIP) of the Borough proposes the replacement of approximately 20 percent of the non-federal housing (60 units) that do not meet

minimum standards.

l-lousing Programs

Programs to replace existing substandard housing are a continuing high priority

of the North Slope Borough (NSB). Technical assistance has been provided to

families in Barrow to assist therewith loan applications and other negotiations

with the Farmers Home Administration, and the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation (an agency of the Alaska State Housing Authority) and private housing

contractors. Approximately 20 new FtfA and AHFC-financed housing units were

prefabricated by CAPP Homes and shipped to Barrow by barge in 1973. An

-96-
D

BARROW LAND USE

Residential Land Use

additional 15 homes were rehabilitated or substantially replaced under the

FHA home impwvement loan program (William Tegoseak, former Director, Borough

Housing Program).

The North Slope Borough has also built housing in Browerville using funds

from general obligation bonds. This effort is part of a five-year program

of housing construction throughout the Borough. Thirty-four of the planned

36 single-family units, 12 of the 20 planned four-plex housing units, and

9 housing units for the elderly have been built under this funding program.

The Borough’s Draft 1977 Capital Improvements Program (CIP), now suspended,

called for the construction of an additional two single-family units, two

more four-plex teacher housing units, a 29-unit apartment, and another

four-plex. When funded, Blackstock Homes will manage the construction of

its pre-cut units for all of these projects using Borough crews. In the

longer run, the 1974/75 CIP estimated a need to construct 150 units to

accommodate the growth of the conmwnity. The Plan, recognizing the difficulty in meeting th?s goal within the six-year period of the CIP, deferred

35 percent, or 53 units, until after FY 1979/80. .

An additional housing assistance program of the Arctic Slope Regional Corporation has resulted in a grant of $4.32 million from the Department of Housing

and Urban Development. The monies will be used for the purchase of 72

existing apartments for i{ative housing in Barrow (Anchorage Times, May 24,

1977).

Utilities Service

There is a reciprocal relationship between the programs for the provision of

housing and the programs for the provision of sewer and water facilities.

In 1973, for example, the construction of federally assisted new housing in

Barrow was contingent upon a State Department of Environmental ConservationB

approved water supply and sanitation system. In order to obtain federal

funding, the Borough requested implementation by the Indian Health Service (IHS)

of the Public Health Service of the City’s 1972 Water and Sewer Master Plan.

-97-
BARROW LAND USE

Residential Land Use

The response of the IHS, however, was that the City would need to construct

or improve 100 homes before such improvements could be justified. The

Borough was caught between conflicting requirements of two governmental

agencies. The situation was resolved by implementation of an interim water

supply, sewage and solid waste hauling service by the City of Barrow.

The FHA and the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation in turn financed the new

housing; this housing riow lends impetus to the completion by IHS of the

long range Water and Sewer Master Plan,

~

Community Growth

According to the Borough Planning Director, the number of hew orreplaced housing

units constructed since 1973 has increased the total housing in Barrow by approximately 20 percent. Virtually all of this housing has been constructed within

the existing residential areas of Barrow and Browerville. However, little land

remains for new residential development. Approximately two to four acres are

available in Browerville, and a few isolated lots are available in the City.

Projected population growth to 5,000 in 1990, under moderate growth assumptions (John Graham & Company, 1973), will create additional de~ands for

housing tliat cannot be met within the existing built-up areas of the city,

without substantial redevelopment at higher densities. Although the Borough

has not yet undertaken an update or revision of the Master Plan, the Planning

Department presently sees no reason to doubt its growth assumptions and

projections.

Other improvement programs forecast similar growth. The Public Health Service

Preliminary Design Analysis for Water Supply and Distribution (1974) is

based upon a growth factor of 198 percent -- from 2200 persons and 370 homes,

to 4350 persons and 750 homes. No timetable is established for reaching

this design capacity, but the schedule probably will not keep pace with new

housing construction.

-98-
BARROW LAND USE

Residential Land Use

The two basic options for expansion of the city’s residential areas consist

of Block “A” east of Barrow, and land within the NARL tract east of

Browerville. Block “A” contains approximately 150 platted lots (H.V.

Lounsbury, 1976). This expansion area is fixed in size by the airport

along its southern boundary and by Isatkoak Lagoon along its north and east

boundaries.

Expansion within the NARL tract east of Browerville would require an agreement with ‘the Office of Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale

sters the tract. The Borough is presently seeking to

east side of Ahkovak Road. An easement of 200 to 400

left along the portion of the Isatkoak Lagoon east of

Reserves, which adminilease land along the

feet in width will be

the PHS dam, to avoid

runoff contamination of the city’s water source (See Figure 3. Land

Use).

The Barrow Region Master Plan assumes that approximately 750 dwelling units

is the single-family dwelling holding capacity of the city with expansion

into Block “A” (138 lots} and into the area east of Browerville (170 lots).

It should be noted that this figure assumes an even higher occupancy rate

(6 persons per dwelling unit) than existed in 1973 (5.64 persons per dwelling

units). The severe problems of overcrowding are apparently to be alleviated

by construction of larger houses. Such housing, however, may be beyond the

financial reach of many of

units in Block “A” were to

A third potential area for

Barrow’s residents. Originally, 100 housing

be built under federal funding.

housing construction is the 8-acre site in the

center of Barrow occupied by the U.S. Weather Service. The Barrow Master

Plan recommends that the Weather Service relocate its operations to Block

“B”, south of the airport, designated by the NSB for industrial development.

The feasibility and status of this relocation is unknown.

Implicit in the planning for expansion into these areas has been the assumption that the single-family house will continue to be the dominant form of

-99-
.

-1oo-
BARROW LAND USE

. Residential Land Use

housing. The Barrow Master Plan, drafted in 1973, assumes that demands for

privacy would inhibit public acceptance of apartment living. A year later

in 1974, Dupere & Associates reported that 86 percent of the housing units

were owner-occupied; and that fully half of the people renting units were

dissatisfied with their housing. Another response indicated that higher

housing densities would not be found objectionable. This apparent change

in attitude is reflected in recent housing constructed in Barrow.

While the long term population growth assumptions contained in the Barrow

Master Plan and the PHS Preliminary Water Supply Plan remain in effect, the

form of housing meant to accommodate that growth may be changing significantly.

The construction of multi-family units in the past four years is generally

keeping pace with single-family construction. It is not known if the new

apartments are occupied primarily by new residents, former (dissatisfied)

renters ‘of existing housing, or former residents of other overcrowded

housing.

New patterns of land use may emerge in Barrow as a result of a shift toward

higher density housing. Limited land area available for construction,

together with the high costs of providing utilities service to new areas,

and increased construction and maintenance costs may have ~ effect on provision of other services as well. Educational, recreational and commercial

facilities may have to be built to serve higher concentrations of development than envisioned in the 1973 Master Plan.

-1o1-
BARROW LAND USE

Recreational Land Use

RECREATIONAL LAND USE

CURRENT RECREATIONAL LAND USE .

Recreational opportunities are relatively limited in Barrow. Indoor recreation

includes two movie theatres (one owned by the Borough and the other by the

Arctic Slope Regional Corporation), two poolrooms, City-owned ping pong and

pool facilities, the school gymnasium, the Youth Center and the young children’s play area in the village corporation-owned supermarket. NARL has a

theatre and a small recreational building, but these facilities are limited

in size and restricted to use by camp personnel (U.S. Dept. of the Navy, 1977).

Tourists can see a collection of stuffed arctic wildlife at the NARL camp,

including wolves, polar bears, wolverine, arctic foxes and several types of

birds (Stenmark and Schoder, 1974).

The City of Barrow is responsible for recreation programs. Along with public

safety it is the only public service not carried out by the North Slope

Borough. The City has a 6-7 person recreational advisory committee and has

recently hired a recreational director. The City and local service clubs

(VFW, Lions’ Club, Mothers’ Club) fund a program which provide; an older

building for ping pong and pool (William Tegoseak, City Manager, Barrow).

.

The BIA school has a gymnasium for basketball and a basketball league. The

community also uses the gym for community events and meetings. The City’s

recreational program has no direct relationship with the school’s program.

The school also operates a local summer camp.

Outdoor recreation in the vicinity includes hunting and fishing by local residents for subsistence purposes. Because of the rigorous climate, relative

inaccessibility and the absence of nearby big game and game fish, there has

been little local tourist hunting and fishing. An air taxi service, however,

shuttles hunters and fishermen to the major rivers and other hunting areas

in the region.

-1o2-
D

BARROW

Within the community of Barrow and

now play on abandoned trucks, fuel

NARL there are no

storage tanks and

ment found throughout the community: The BIA school

equipment.

/

LAND USE

Recreational Land Use

parks. Young children

other industrial equiphas some outdoor play

The most prevalent form of local recreation for teenagers and adults appears

to be riding snowmobiles and three-wheeled monocycles, and duck hunting at

a summer camp on the Point Barrow spit.

RECREATIONAL LAND USE ISSUES

A pressing need for more recreational facilities exists in !?arrow. Indoor

facilities and a variety of activities are lacking. The Youth Center is

overburdened as a community hall (U.S. Dept. of the Navy, 1977). Outdoor

recreation potential is restricted by a lack of available land.

B Anticipated development of facilities has been slowed by~a 75 percent reduc.

tion in City revenues resulting from elimination of a. City sales tax on

food. However, funding is expected to increase as a result of the sale of

liquor at a recently completed, City-owned liquor store. “

Outdoor Recreation .

The City Manager is seeking appropriation of $19,000 for outdoor equipment

at a 1.5 acre Browerville park site. The City is also investigating areas

in the older part of the city for another park site. Possible activities

under consideration are tennis cou~ts convertible to an ice skating rink

in winter, and baseball and other field sports. The City is investigating

federal funding opportunities for these park facilities.

Potential for other outdoor recreation includes cross country skiing and

water sports. The North Slope Borough Department of Public Works has mentioned the possibility of developing Lower Isatkoak Lagoon into a small boat

B harbor (Harry Stotts, Public Works Di rector, North Slope Borough).

---
BARROW LAND USE

Recreational Land Use

Indoor Recreation

Indoor facilities under consideration by the City include a library, dance

hall, new theatre and a community building in conjunction with a community

laundry/shower/sauna facility. The 32,000 square-foot supermarket-department

store recently opened by the Barrow Ukpeagvik Inupiat Corporation is apparently

the first phase of a complex which is planned to include a theatre, bowling

alley, laundry, restaurant and new corporate headquarters for the Arctic

Slope Regional Corporation.

.

.

-1o4-
BARROW LAND USE

Archaeologic & Historic Sites

ARCHAEOLOGIC AND HISTORIC SITES

CURRENT ARCHAEOLOGIC AND HISTORIC SITE STATUS

There are at least seven archaeologic or historic sites in the Barrow vicinity

worthy of preservation. Point Barrow, 7.5 miles northeast of Barrow, is the

northernmost point of land in the United States. In 1912, the Advisory

Board on National Parks, Historic Sites, Buildings and Monuments identified

Point Barrow as having significance in commemorating the history of the

United States (CCC/HOKandMKGK, 1973). A second site, the Birnirk archaeological site, located on the Point Barrow spit, was listed in the National

Register of Historic Places. The site includes a series of mounds which have

enabled archaeologists to trace the development of

approximately 600 A.D. to the present. The nearby

nominated to the National Register.

Eskimo culture from

Kugusugaruk site was also

Sites recognized by the State of Alaska include the Wiley Post/Will Rogers

Monument and the Brewer Cafe in Browerville. The Wiley Post/Will Rogers

Monument is located about 10 miles southeast of the village where the two

flyers crashed in their small plane in 1935. Because there is-no road

access, the monument is difficult to visit.

.

Charles Brewer, a whaler and fur trader from New York, founded Browerville in

1886. A post office was established in 1901. Brewer also founded a cafe

that has been cited by the State Historical Commission. It is located near

the coast on Brewer Street.

In the older part of Barrow, at least two other sites are worthy of note.

The Utkeavgik Presbyterian Church was built in 1898 and is located on

Momegana Street near the North Slope Borough office building. It is a clapboard structure in reasonably good repair. The other site is an historic

sod house located near the coast on Stevenson Street. The North Slope

Borough Council has noted the value of the structure as the only remaining

example of what was once the traditional form of dwelling in Barrow.

-1o5-
BARROW LAND USE

Archeologic & Historic Sit(

ARCHAEOLOGIC AND HISTORIC SITE PRESERVATION ISSUES

Programs for preservation and enhancement of these archaeologic and historic

sites include provisions of the National Historic Preservation Act, and historic preservation programs of the Borough. Sites listed in the National

Register of Historic Places are protected from encroachment by projects

financed or licensed by the United States, and in most cases are eligible

for 50 percent matching grants under the National Historic Preservation Act.

Grants may be used for acquisition, stabilization and/or restoration (Alaska

Division of Parks, 1976).

In recent years, interest has been expressed in developing historic attractions in Barrow that are of interest to tourists. One possibility is the

establishment of an Eskimo cultural center that would house artifacts uncovered

in abandoned villages on the North Slope, as well as other exhibits (John

Graham & Company, 1973). It is speculated that the most logical source for

funding of this museum would be the National Park Service. The exhibits

could follow or expand upon the collection of artifacts included in the

small museum located on the NARL base. An upgrading of tourist accommodations would necessarily have to accompany the development of tourist

attractions.

.

-106-
BARROW LAND STATUS

LAND STATUS

.

CURRENT” OWNERSHIP

The City of Barrow occupies a land area of approximately 23 square miles

along the north coast tip of Point Barrow. With the exception of the State

territorial waters to the west, the land around the city is entirely dominated by federal ownership. The massive National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska

(NPR-A) surrounds the community to the south and the east; and the Naval

Arctic Research Laboratory tract (U.S. Naval Tract No. 1 ) 1 i es to the north.

The surface rights to an area of approximately 200,000 acres overlying

NPR-A around the city are held by the Barrow Native Village Corporation

(See Figure 4, Barrow Region Land Status).

The Ukpeagvik Inupiat Corporation, the Barrow village corporation, has

received entitlements totalling 201,232 acres. These-entitlements extend

three townships, or 18 miles, south of Barrow and approximately four townships, or 24 miles, to the east. The selection also includes Point Barrow

and the Barrier Islands of Elson Lagoon. Since all of the village surface

lands lie within NPR-A, the Arctic Slope Regional Corporation is selecting

an equivalent acreage of “in lieu” subsurface lands outside the Reserve.

Vi]’

Act

en t

The

.

age entitlements provided for under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement

are limited to the surface estate only. The basic purpose of village

tlements is to protect the lands around villages used for subsistence.

surface rights, however, also entitle the village corporation to sell

or lease parcels of land to individuals and organizations as required by

the Act.

The following principal activities are located within the U.S. Naval Tract:

the 4541-acre Naval Arctic Research Laboratory and its airport; the 268-

acre POW Main DEW Line facility (U.S. Air Force Tract “A”); a small National

Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) weather rocket launch site just

south of the Point Barrow spit; and a Coast Guard Communications site south

-107-
Qz

Skz

CJ

Q) %! 30

%! m

-108-
BARROW

of South Salt Lagoon (see Figure 5, Barrow Area Land

of Barrow is located South Barrow Gas Field Tract No.

LAND STATUS

Status). To the east

2, which is under the

control of the Office of Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves. The field

supplies all of the natural gas fuel for the city and operations in the

NARL tract.

Within the city, the major blocks of ownership are

occupying approximately 730 acres of land, and the

tration Very High Frequency Omnirange and Tactical

the State of Alaska Airport,

Federal Aviation AdminisAir Navigation (VORTAC )

facility on a 370-acre tract of land, both south of the developed portion

of the city. Most of the remaining land in Barrow is in private ownership.

It is estimated that more than 85 percent of the single-family units in the

city are owner-occupied (Dupere & Associates, 1974).

Other smaller blocks of ownership in the city proper are the 8-acre site of

the U.S. Weather Service established in the early 1940’s; the approximately

10-acre Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) elementary school site located adjacent to Isatkoak Lagoon; and the Public Health Service (PHS) hospital,

also located adjacent to the lagoon on an approximately 9.5 acre site. The

North Slope Borough occupies a new administration building in ~he city and

owns other facilities such as the Polar Bear Theatre and the facilities of

Inupiat University. .

LAND STATUS ISSUES

Important issues of land status at Barrow include planning for the use of

lands conveyed to the Native village under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement

Act, and land ownership limitations to community growth.

The Barrow village corporation has undertaken a land use planning program for

its lands. Working with the North Slope Borough Planning Department, the

ASRC has begun to locate potential sites for extraction of gravel, binder

material (clay-like soils which can be used as a base for gravel in the construction of roads) and coal.

-1o9-
BARROW (LOMIW.INITY SWDY c 13ARFKXAJ AREA LAND 5TAWS
BARROW LAND STATUS

Land status at the local level is an important determinant of future city

growth. The city is bounded on the west by the Chukchi Sea and on the east

by Isatkoak Lagoon. Potential expansion to the north and south, however,

is blocked by State and federal ownerships. North of the city is the Naval

Arctic Research Laboratory. To the south lies the State-owned airport.

Options for city expansion include additional development on Navy land east

of Browerville, and on land south of the airport, known as Block “B”. The

North Slope Borough is seeking a lease of Navy lands for contiguous community

residential expansion east of Browerville. Although portions of Block’’B”

have already been platted by the Bureau of Land Management, any development

could require costly connections to existing and future Barrow utilities, as

well as other commercial infrastructure. Because of its proximity to the

airport, the approximately 35-acre Block “B” has been proposed by the Borough

for industrial development.

Continued development on lands within the city will be carried out under

governmental sponsorship. Because of the extremely limited incomes of most

Barrow residents, land ownership normally does not create the kinds of

.

opportunities for private entrepreneurial development found elsewhere.

Commercial development has been and continues to be carried out by government agencies. However, there has been a pronounced shift”from exclusively

federal government provision of goods and services to land ownership and

development by local Borough government and the quasi-public Arctic Slope

Regional Corporation. The Borough has built single-family housing and

apartments. The ASRC has built the Top of the World Hotel, the Barrow

supermarket, a warm-storage facility and a heavy equipment shop and fuel

storage facilities in the NARL tract.

-111-
BARROW

UTILITIES

UTILITIES

Utilities service in a cornnunity

economic development but also for

winter conditions of darkness and

like Barrowis critical not only for

physical health and survival. Under

severe cold (averaging -18°F. in February,

with a wind chill factor of -55”F.), safe and reliable heating and electricity is essential. In a location where limited clean water sources are

frozen for at least eight months of the year, methods of water supply,

storage and distribution, and disposal of liquid wastes must be developed

which guarantee minimum standards of sanitation. Surface drainage must be

controlled so that spring thaw does not produce annual flooding of lowlying homes.

Unfortunately, most of the utility systems in Barrow are in need of significant improvements. Water and sewer service is limited to a few governmental

and commercial facilities; and extremely costly extension of service to all

of the homes in the city is unlikely for a number of years. The gas supply

and distribution network for Barrow and NARL is dangerously unsafe and in

need of immediate repair. Thereis no storm sewer system; sur~ace runoff

is now dammed by raised roadways, and a plan for providing culverts is

proceeding very slowly. .

-112-
BARROW UTILITIES

Water and Sewer Service

WATER AND SEWER SERVICE

Barrow is the largest community in Alaska without a piped water supply and

sewage disposal system. With the exception of a few governmental facilities,

all housing, commercial and

purchase of hauJed water or

disposal of stored wastes.

other government buildings rely upon costly

ice and upon inconvenient and often unsanitary

The provision of city-wide water distribution and sewage disposal systems

have long been planned, but delayed because of high costs and federal agency

priorities. Such factors as a limited supply of potable water, technical

difficulties of piping and storing water in an extremely cold climate, and

a limited number of housing units to be served, have historically made unit

costs extremely high.

The recent implementation of an interim water supply and sewage disposal

system, however, has allowed for the construction of new housing, which in

turn has justified federal funding of the first phases of a long range plan.

These improvements will eventually create a utilities infrastructure which

will allow for other improvements of existing housing and more systematic

growth of the community. Without this infrastructure, the.community may not

be able to support some of the new commercial and industrial development

that could diversify its economy and provide additional services.

WATER SERVICE

Existing piped water supply, treatment and storage facilities include the

BIA Indian Affairs School plant and the PHS Hospital in Barrow, and the

new laboratory at the NARL base.

City of Barrow

The hospital and

disposal system.

Lagoon, near the

the 61A complex share a water and sewage treatment and

The facilities are located at the west end of Isatkoak

Borough’s new gas-powered electric generator. Water

is withdrawn from the Lagoon and treated by a reverse osmosis (RO) system

-113-
BARROW UTILITIES

Water and Sewer Service

that was meant to replace a more costly distillation system in 1973.

Water treatment consists of removal of salt and brine by heating to 70° F.

Unfortunately, the RO system is still not working efficiently, because of

corrosion damage to water pumps, forcing reliance on the older steam distillation system (Dean Wolf, Barrow Utilities & Electrical Co-op).

In order to facilitate new housing construction, the PHS funded an

of the BIA water treatment facility in 1974, to 10,000 gallons per

expansion

day.

Water is delivered to homes by two tank trucks purchased for the City by the

PHS. The cost to distill water is estimated at nearly 104 per gallon, and

to deliver itan additional 54 per gallon (ibid.). The BIA treatment facility,

a 10,000-gallon water storage tank, and the water distribution service is

operated by Barrow Utilities

A second source of water for

and Electrical Co-op (BUI).

the village is Emaiksoun Lake, approximately

three miles south of the city. Residents either haul their own water and

ice or purchase hauled water and ice from a private individual. The cost

of water is estimated at 66 per gallon and 35-404,per cubic foot for ice.

Ice cut from the lake in winter is stored outside of houses an-d melted as

needed, using gas-fired stoves.

.

Emaiksoun Lake is an unsanitary and unreliable source of potable water. The

lake is shallow (54 inches deep) and winter supplies of ice have apparently

run out as early as January in some years (U.S. Dept. of the Navy, 1977).

When the lake has not completely frozen to the bottom, water beneath the

ice has been nearly completely pumped out, leaving only small amounts of

brackish and muddy water (Dupere & Associates, 1973). Possible contamination of the lake at the source, and contamination of ice outside of houses,

may contribute to the periodic outbreaks of hepatitis in the village.

Purchased or hauled water is stored in enclosed water storage tanks in homes

or other buildings. In order to qualify for FHA insured home improvements

and new home construction, the City requires that delivery service only be

extended to homes with a minimum of 200 gallons storage capacity (City of

-114-
BARROW UTILITIES

Water and Sewer Service .

Barrow, April 1973). It is not known how many homes in Barrow now qualify

for water delivery by BUI.

Water consumption estimates for Barrow and other communities in the region

vary greatly. Because of the extremely high cost and inconvenience associated

with delivery and storage of water and ice, however, consumption is far below

other communities in Alaska with conventional water supply and distribution

sys terns. Estimates vary between 5 and 10 gallons per day per person in

Barrow (U.S. Fish &Wildlife Service, March 1977).

Naval Arctic Research Laboratory

The primary source of water for NARL is Imikpuk Lake, located just northeast

of the main camp. Water is piped to a plant in the center of the camp,

where it is treated using a reverse osmosis system installed in 1973.

Treated water is then piped to the dining hall and a laboratory.

The Navy plans to utilize Imikpuk Lake as a water source for the foreseeable

future (John Graham & Company, 1973). The planned capacity of the RO unit

installed in 1973 was 30,000 gallons per day. It was anticipated that a

second unit of similar capacity could be installed when needed. Similar to

the City’s system, however, the RO unit has not performed reliably (Dean

Wolfe, Barrow Utilities and Electrical Co-op). The camp’s water reservoir

capacity is unknown, but it is estimated that per capita water useage is

nearly 125 gallons per day (ITT Arctic Services, Inc.).

SEWER SERVICE

With the exception of the BIA plant, the PHS hospital, the Weather Service,

and the laboratory building at NARL, all sewage is collected in chemical

toilets, “honey buckets” (55-gallon oil drums), or larger containers in

major buildings. Some newer facilities, such as the Top of the World Hotel,

partially treat their waste and dump it into the sea. The BIA operates a

treatment plant, which handles wastes from its facility, and that of the PHS

hospital. Primary treated sewage is dumped into a small lagoon at the lower

end of Isatkoak Lagoon, with an outfall into the ocean. Residential water
BARROW UTILITIES

Water and Sewer Service

wastes produced by cooking, washing and cleaning are disposed of through

dwelling-unit drainage systems, which discharge directly onto the ground

outside the dwelling (Department of.the Navy, 1977).

At NARL, sewage from the laboratory building is treated and then discharged

into Middle Salt Lagoon, which also has an outfall into the ocean (John

Graham & Company, 1973). Kitchen water, shower and wash water is dumped

directly into the ocean. In late 1973, an incinerator, funded jointly by

the Navy, BIA and PHS, was built by the Navy adjacent to South Salt Lagoon.

The purpose of this facility was to incinerate all solid waste and human

waste generated by NARL and the city.

The incinerator, however, has failed to operate as planned and has been

closed down. In addition to technical difficulties ;n processing the 55-

gallon drums containing human wastes, the costs of operation proved exorbitant (Department of the Navy, 1977). Consequently, waste is collected by

truck and dumped into plastic bags or barrels, and placed in the community

dump adjacent to the incinerator.

.

In 1973, the Navy was constructing a package sewage treatment plant at NARL.

Data on the use, capacity and performance of the sYstem are not available.

As part of the Borough’s interim water supply and sewage disposal plant

adopted by City ordinance in 1973, all new housing was equipped with chemical

toilets with a holding tank of approximately 50 gallons capacity. Toilets

were situated in the dwelling in a manner which would permit future gravity

drainage a distance of not more than 40 feet to a public right of way. A

vacuum haul truck now collects waste from a pipe outside of each house.

The proposed ordinance also called for a twice-monthly pickup, for a monthly

fee of $10.00. Wastes are then taken by two trucks purchased by the PHS

for the City, either to the BIA treatment plant or to the sanitary land fill

near the incinerator.

-116-
P

BARROW UTILITIES

Water and Sewer Service

WATER AND SEWER SERVICE ISSUES

Improvements to the water and sewer systems of Barrow remain the highest

priority of the North Slope Borough: Studies by the BIA, PHS, the Alaska

State Housing Authority, and others, have documented the incidence of infectious diseases associated witti unsanitary water supply and sewage disposal

in Barrow (John Graham & Company, 1973). Even though systems which seem to

offer great improvernmts, such as the NARL incinerator and the BIA water

and sewer treatment plant, have had operational difficulties. The incinerator has been closed down and the BIA water treatment system continues

to function inadequately. The BIA plant discharges only primary-treated

(chlorinated and aerated) sewage into the lower Lagoon, and the unpleasant

odor of this outfall has been noted by Browerville residents on the other

side of the lagoon.

History of Planned Improvements

There is a complex history of federal agency involvement in improvements

to Barrow’s water and sewer systems. Because agency activities had traditionally been carried out independently and with little regard. to long-range

plans, an Intergovernmental Coordinating Committee was formed in 1971. Its

membership included representatives of the City of Barrow, =the ASRC~ the BIA,

the

the

the

the

PHS and the State of Alaska. Its work resulted in the preparation gf

Barrow Region~-Master PlanbyJohn Graham & Company in 1973. Since then,

Borough has actively sought to coordinate the activities of the FHS and

BIA in order to bring about some of the recommendations made In that

plan.

Studies undertaken by the PHS resulted in a Water and Sewer Master Plan and

Preliminary Engineering Report, whose recommendations were incorporated in

the Graham master plan. Some of the elements of the plan are now being

implenmted, while others have been delayed or thought too costly to be

carried out.

-117- G
BARROW UTILITIES

Water and Sewer Service

The Borough originally anticipated that the PtlS would be funding all planned

sewer and water improvements, but the Indian Health Service restricted PHS

funding only to service to new or improved housing for Native people (North

Slope Borough, April 1973). Sfnce the proposed 100-unit federally funded

housing project in Block “A” was not built, the water supply and sanitation

facilities for this new housing and other older housing in the community

could not be built using PHS funds. Consequently, the Borough would have to

assume nearly all of the improvement costs in the community.

As a result, the Borough implemented the interim water supply, sewage and

solid waste disposal plan which is in effect today. The plan provides for

the hauling of treated water, and truck disposal of solid and Iiquid waste.

The program is being carried out by Barrow Utilities-under the auspices of

the City of Barrow.

The following summarizes key elements of the plan for water and sewer service

that will be followed by the PHS during the next few years.

Water Supply .

In order to provide a safe, reliable water supDly for the city, the PHS is

in the process of completing a dam across Isatkoak Lagoon tSetween Barrow

and Browerville. The dam will be wide enough (40 feet) to accommodate a

road across the top to serve as a bypass to the rapidly eroding coastal

road.

water

upper

Sewer

water

An above-ground transmission line has been built between the BIA

treatment plant and a planned 20,000-square foot pump house at the

portion of the lagoon above the dam (See Figure 6, Planned Mater and

Improvements). The PHS estimates that the dam will be completed and

piped to the treatment plant sometime in 1978. An existing 600,000

gallon steel tank adjacent to the BIA complex will be utilized for storage

of the treated water.

-118 -
Q

\

. . . . . . .

:.:..

. . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . .

:.:.:.:,..

. . .

. . .

. .

,.-..—.—. T

M

-J

c1

!2

z

5

CL

/i

-119-
BARROW UTILITIES

Water and Sewer Service

Water and Sewer Distribution ,

Long range water distribution improvements are planned to serve 750 homes .

with an average daily consumption rate of 45 gallons per person per day.

Assuming a population of 4,350, the maximum daily flow would be 400,000

gallons (Alaska Native Health Service, 1974).

The plan recommends construction of an above-ground utilidor network containing sewer and water pipes. The utilidor system would serve the major

potential users in the main part of Barrow (not including Browervil le).

An engineering report on the first phase of the system is expected to be

completed by the Office of Environmental Health of the PHS by September

1977. Under the original water and sewer master plan, utilidors were

aligned along the rear lot lines of houses, but current plans are for

alignments along principal streets. The first phase utilidor will run

west from the BIA complex along Agvik Street, past the new NSB offices,

the ASRC supermarket, Schontz’s General Store, and the planned ASRC offices

to the Top of the World Hotel. Because PHS funds are limited to community

water and sewer needs (housing), the PHS expects that much of the costs of

the first phase utilidor will have to be born by the Borough. -

Additional linkages to the utilidor system extend south to-the airport on

Kiogak and Momegana Streets, and east along Okpik Street towards the future

Block “A” housing. Because of priorities within the Indian Health Service,

OEH estimates that construction of these utilidors will not take place

until the 1980’s. Consequently, it can be surmised that the completion of

a city-wide water and sewer system serving all homes is unlikely for a

number of years.

Sewage treatment alternatives include construction of a mechanical sewage

treatment plant near

utilization of South

B

stabilization pond.

the PHS reverse osmosis water treatment plant, or

Salt Lagoon, near the Navy incinerator, as a sewage

-120-
BARROW UTILITIES

Water and Sewer Service

The Borough is planning construction of a public laundry and bathing facility

for Barrow. Since the economic feasibility of a piped water supply and

sewage collection system for the entire community was deemed questionable

(North Slope Borough, April 1973), it was suggested that this facility

could provide a more realistic solution to a pressing problem (although

it was not included as an alternative in the original 1972 PHS Water and

Sewer Master Plan).

This position is reflected in the Borough’s 1977 Draft Capital Improvements

Program which proposes construction of a two phase water and sewer system

for all Borough communities. The first phase would consist of developing

a water source, providing safe water treatment, a conmwnity watering point,

central laundry, showers, toilet facilities and a sewage disposal system.

Because these are public facility needs, as distinguished from community

)

water and sewer needs, most of the costs would be met by Borough funding.

The second phase would provide sewer and water service to individual homes,

and would be funded by PHS.

The Borough’s CIP has been suspended because of litigation initiated by

the oil companies concerning the tax rate. As a consequence, the schedule

for construction of the Borough’s portion of these sewer and water facilities

is in doubt.

-121-
BARROW UTILITIES

Gas and Electricity

GAS AND ELECTRICITY

Barrow and NARL have independent systems of gas and electrical service.

The common source of natural gas is the South Barrow Gas Field, located in

the National Petroleum Reserve south of the city. Gas is utilized for

electrical

through an

mounted on

Gas Source

generation and heating of all buildings. It is distributed

obsolete network of above-ground pipes. Electrical lines are

a conventional network of power poles.

Originally, Barrow utilized coal as its primary heating fuel. The coal was

hauled by caterpillar train from the mine at Ataksook, approximately 60

miles to the south (Dupere and Associates, 1973). Today, Barrow receives

its gas from the South Barrow Gas Field, approximately 5 miles south of

the city. This Navy-owned field has been in production since 1949, when

military installations at Barrow began using natural gas (John Graham &

Company, 1973). In 1958, other federal agencies in Barrow, such as the

BIA and the PHS, began using gas. Until 1964, the community utilized fuel

oil for heating. Only after it ran out of fuel supplies durin~ the winter

of 1963 was gas made finally available to the residents of Barrow. The

gas distribution lines to individual homes and businesses Were built in 1964.

In 1968, the quantity of recoverable gas in this field was estimated at 17.7

billion cubic feet, or a 15-year supply (ibid.). By 1972 an assumed 11.6

billion cubic feet, a supply sufficient for an additional 7 to 8years, was

estimated to remain. Before Barrow renegotiated its contract with the

Navy in 1974, additional wells were drilled which gave some positive signs

of success. A 1976 study by H.J. Gray & Associates indicated that there

were 16.1 billion cubic feet of recoverable gas remaining in the field,

enough to meet demand requirements (increasing at a rate of 5 percent per

year) until 1986 (U.S. Dept. of the Navy, 1977).

Gas pressure in the field began to drop in 1976, and the North Slope Borough

pressed for further drilling. In February of 1977 a “significant reserve”

-122-
BARROW UTILITIES

Gas and Electricity

of gas was discovered by Husky Oil. Although the exact size of the discovery

has not been confirmed, indications are that there are sufficient quantities

to serve Barrow’s needs for at least 20years (NSB, February 1977).

The cost of gas for Barrow customers has always been a source of concern.

In 1974, commercial rates were $1.25 to $1.65 per 1,000 cubic feet (MCF),

and residential rates 50@ per MCF. Government installations got their gas

for free, and consequently there was much waste. In 1976, the NSB negotiated

an agreement with the Navy under provisions of the Naval Petroleum Reserve

Act of 1976, which reduced the wholesale costs to the Borough’s utilities

contractor, Barrow Utilities and Electrical Co-op, Inc., to $.32.4/MCF for

both residentiiil and commercial customers. At the same time, a rate of

$.61 .4/MCF was established

Gas Distribution System

for governmental customers (Dean Wolfe, 1977).

Gas from the South Barrow Gas Field is transported to the city in a 6-inch

pipe and to NARL in a 4-inch pipe. These lines are laid on wood pilings

with expansion loops placed at approximately 340 foot intervals. The lines

operate under a pressure of about 250 psi from the collector/r~ducing station

at the field to metering/reducing stations in the city and Browerville. A

4-inch, 80 psi from the BIA utility building crosses the luwer sewage lagoon

dam to Browerville. The City line is well-engineered and in good condition,

while the NARL line is in poor condition (John Graham & Company, 1973).

Within the city, gas is distributed to individual homes and to Browerville

through an above-ground network of surplus Navy pipe, installed by the BIA

in 1964. The pipes which follow alignments along the rear lot lines of

homes are crudely mounted at top.of 55-gallon oil drums sawed in half.

Where they follow alignments along streets, driveway arches have been

installed to permit vehicles to pass under them.

Electrical Generators

Electrical generation and distribution in Barrow was established in 1964

under the operation of Barrow Utilities and Electrical Co-op, Inc.,

-123-

.
BARROM UTILITIES

Gas and Electricity

financed by the Bureau of Indian Affairs. In 1967, the BIA and the PHS

replaced the original diesel generators, with a capacity of 1150 kw, with

two gas turbines generating a totalof 1500 kw. These facilities were

built to meet the needs of the school and the hospital, and any excess

capacity was sold to the village.

Increasing load demands, plus the age and condition of the existing power

units, resulted in their replacement by the Borough in early 1977. With

the construction in 1976 of the NSB administration building, the ASRC

supermarket, the Eskimos, Inc. (an ASRC subsidiary) heavy equipment shop

in Browerville, and new housing, load on the system increased 24 percent

over the previous year. In 1975 the demand was at approximately 1400 kw

and the winter of 1976-77 approached 1700 kw (Alaska Construction and Oil,

February 1977).

Consequently

installed by

per year (ibfive years.

two new generators with a total capacity of 2710 kw were

the Borough. With an estimated 10 percent i~crease in demand

d.), excess capacity would appear to last for approximately

These gas generators have a dual-fuel system, whi”ch permits

switch-over to liquid fuel operation under load condition. The 1500 kw

units will be retained as a back-up supply. .

The City’s electrical distribution system was installed by the Golden Valley

REA Cooperative and is considered to be in relatively good condition (U.S.

Dept. of the Navy, 1977). It serves all existing housing in Barrow,

including Browerville.

The Naval Arctic Research Laboratory has a plant which was instal led in 1972

and consists of four gas turbine-units generating 3000 kw. The plant replaced

four badly deteriorated diesel generators that had been converted to natural

gas use. These four generators had a capacity of 1400 kw, but were so

unreliable they had to be supplemented with a 750 kw generator, which is

now used for standby.
BARROW

GAS AND ELECTRICAL SERVICE ISSUES

UTILITIES

Gas and Electricity

Safety of operation is the primary issue related to Barrow’s gas and

electrical systems. This section discusses improvements to these systems,

including gas and electrical inter-ties between Barrow and NARL and replacement of Barrow’s gas

In order to minimize

its gas distribution

an “Alternative Fuel

distribution pipeline network.

Barrow’s present dependence upon its gas source and

system, the Alaska Power Administration has commissioned

Study for Barrow”, by R.M. Beck, Denver, due for completion late July 1977 (Dean Wolfe, Barrow Utilities).

Gas and Electrical Interties

Because each of the gas supply and electrical generation and distribution

systems of NARL and the city have been developed independently, neither

system can provide back-up to the other in the event of an emergency. If

there were a break in the trunk gas ?ine serving Barrow or NARL, electrical

generators would have to rely on limited supplies of diesel fuel until the

line could be repaired. If one electrica? generator failed, as it did in

a 1973 storm, standby generating equipment can be used, although these older

generators have limited capacity.

.

The most serious deprivation would occur if a gas outage were to restrict

the fuel supply to homes and commercial

facilities maintain limited supplies of

use in case of an emergency, homes have

mission line were to fail in the middle

facilities. Although government

diesel fuel for their restricted

no such supplies. If a gas transof winter, there would be no fuel

for home heating, cooking, or even melting ice for water. The situation

poses a serious threat to the physical well-being of both Barrow and NARL

residents.

In its Draft 1977 Capital Improvenwnts Program, the

both a gas and electrical intertie between the city

anticipates that funding for the estimated $625,000

Borough has included

and NARL. The Borough

gas intertie and the

-125-
BARROW UTILITIES

Gas and Electricity

$375,000 electrical intertie would be shared among the Borough, Barrow

Utilities and Electrical Co-op, Inc., and the U.S. Navy. These costs were

originally identified in the 1973 Master Plan; undoubtedly they have escalated since that time.

The recommended alignments are shown on Figure 7, Planned Gas and Electric

Interties. The two-mile-long gas intertie would extend from the regional

incinerator building, southwest along the Beach Road along the easterly

boundary of Browerville, across Isatkoak Lagoon, to the 6-inch line at the

easterly limit of Block “A”. The new 6-inch welded steel pipe would be

elevated to 4 feet along the Beach Road and not less that 8 feet in the

vicinity of Browerville and Block “A” , with additional height for street

crossings. A pressure-reducing valve and meter could be added in Browerville

to serve that area and to provide a second point of supply to Barrow across

the lower sewage lagoon dam.

The planned 15 ‘kv electrical intertie would be mounted on conventional 45-

foot power poles spaced at approximately 130 feet. Two transformer banks

and switching systems would be built in enclosed metal buildings of approximately 20 feet by 30 feet for ease of maintenance and operation during

adverse weather conditions. The 3-3/4-mile long recommended alignment

extends south from the NARL power plant to Imikpuk Lake along the Beach Road

(parallel to the

and thence south

existing 2400 v feeder) to the incinerator, to Browerville

across the new dam to the BIA power plant.

Gas Distribution System Improvements

The gas distribution system installed

nally planned as a temporary measure.

replaced in six months (U.S. Dept. of

still operates, it poses a continuous

by the BIA in Barrow in 1964was origiThe surplus Navy pipes were to be

the Navy, 1977). Although the system

danger to the pebple of Barrow. The

pipes are linked with clamped joints (instead of welded joints), which

leak.

-126-
w

I%aJw 7

NARL rlucr

.,—.—,—

IT.—. ““”””:<4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :;~fi

::\::::::::::::

:.:.:.:.:.:,:,:.

. . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .,.,.,.4,,..,<,

. . . . . . . . .

:.:.:.:.:.:.:.>

.:.:+:.:.:.:

:.:.:.:.:.:.:.

I, -1

-.—. —

wmqr FIAMNED ELECTRICA INTEKTR

44 iJNE /“~.

/&N.ml 0ARRo14

—. 6/3S FIELD /

!4 scAMiiMFEE7

w -. /

“\ %-..*.j @

4

i

#

I

BARROW COMMUNITY 5TUDY ● PLANNED 6A5 AND 13.J32TRICAL UWEFUIESI
BARROW UTILITIES

Gas and Electricity

Because most of the network in residential areas is mounted on sections of

salvaged oil drums approximately 18 inches above the ground, it is exposed

to snow machine collisions. The prevalence of bent pipes between houses

is evidence of the frequency of these accidents. No back-up system exists

for use while a faulty section is being repaired. When the pipes are

broken, there is risk of explosion and fire. If an explosion were to occur

between closely spaced homes, or near the PHS Hospital, for example, there

could be a disaster (Dean Wolfe, Barrow Utilities).

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has designed a gas pipeline system for the

BIA to replace the existing network. The planned project would replace

all the 20 psi piping and existing pressure regulators at each building

(BIA, Planning Support Group, August 1976). Al 1 pipe would be elevated on

steel pipe supports, backfilled and frozen into place. Old joints would

be welded using weld fittings and pipes would be sized to handle future load

requirements. Alignments along property lines would be followed to permit

orderly development and inspection.

The $6.4 million project is estimated to require 18 months tozomplete and

would begin in the fall of 1977, according to Eben Hopson, Mayor of the

North Slope Borough. Funding would come entirely from BIA.and would utilize

Barrow labor to complete the project. In order to obtain the necessary

federal funding, a tri-party agreement was made between BIA, NSB and Barrow

Utilities and Electrical Co-op (BUI) in September 1975. In principle, this

agreement provided for:

o Forgiveness by the BIA of a $750,000 loan of indebtedness of Barrow

Utilities, Inc., so that BUI could obtain the necessary new funding

for expansion of service and-system maintenance once the gas pipeline

improvements are made;

● Transferof distribution system owned by BUI to BIA (carried out in 1976);

@ BIA upgrading of the entire gas distribution system to meet federal

pipeline standards; and

-128-
BARROW UTILITIES

Gas and Electricity

● Transfer of the system to the NSB, which would contract with BUI

for its operations and maintenance.

The NSB is also planning for new gas and electrical distribution in Block

“A” and renovation of existing power lines in Barrow. The Draft 1977 Capital

Improvements Program allocates $330,000 for gas distribution and $200,000

for electrical distribution to 163 lots in Block “A”. Approximately 100

power poles have been shipped to Barrow for this project. Although no

contracts have been negotiated pending resolution of litigation which

suspended the CIP, the Borough rates both of these as high priority projects.

.

.

b

-129-
BARROW UTILITIES

Storm Drainage

STORM DRAINAGE

\

EXISTING STORM DRAINAGE

Some residential areas of the city are susceptible to storm water drainage

during spring thaw. These are older homes which were constructed close to

the ground, with inadequate foundations, contributing to dampness and

structural deterioration (John Graham & Company, 1973).

hones have been constructed on pilings, and much of the

built on a continuous gravel pad which has covered over

Spring runoff is rarely great because snow accumulation

Most of the newer

commercial area is

ponds and potholes.

does not exceed 30

i riches. However, a combination of impervious ground conditions and raised

road barriers that block surface flow can create standing water and ponds”

that can remain throughout the year. Because of the erosion susceptibility or surface soils, there has been reluctance to excavate drainage ditches

or trenches for underground storm drainage pipes. Roads constructed on

continuous gravel pads create dams that inhibit surface drainage. Some

runoff is diverted into culverts and directed towards natural drainage

channels, but additional cross-drains are needed.

.

STORM DRAINAGE ISSUES .

The 1973 Barrow Regional Master Plan discussed the options for alleviating

storm drainage problems in the city. An underground storm drainage system

was ruled out because of the potential construction problems with permafrost,

extensive ice lenses of 2 to 3 feet in thickness, and the need for insulated

pipes. The plan recommended filling in all residential areas with gravel

to a depth of 2 feet, and raising some residential streets an additional

foot to divert water to natural tfannels. A few existing houses would have

to be raised as the fill material is brought in.

In %976 an alternative plan was

Engineers, which provided for a

built and ten to be replaced in

culverts to be built and ten to

prepared by H.V. Lounsbury Associates,

total of approximately 20 culverts to be

the older part of Barrow, approximately 10

be replaced in Browerville (where most

-130-
BARROW

P

UTILITIES

Storm Drainage

newer housing has been built), and 8 new culverts in Block “A” (where

no housing yet exists). The Barrow and Browerville system drains into the

sea and Block “A” drains into Isaktoak Lagoon. Thus far, the Borough’s

public works department is repairing streets and adding culverts on an asneeded basis, with no particular reference to the plan.

.

.

.< “>

.

-131-
BARROW UTILITIES

Telephone Service

TELEPHONE SERVICE

Activities in the Arctic can be severely hampered by marginal or limited

communications. Telephone connnunications can provide an emergency link to

outside specialized medical facilities, can be used to order essential

community supplies, and can provide for cultural interchange between isolated

communities in the region.

In February 1977, Barrow’s telephone communications were significantly

improved by operation of an earth satellite communications station. This

station replaced the poor quality General Telephone system installed twelve

years ago. Some of the equipment was thirty years old. Electronic switching

was installed in the school and government offices, and the number of long

distance lines was increased from eight to twenty.

Today there are approximately 850 telephones in the city, or double the

number of just three years ago. Demand for phones averages approximately

three a day. There is a hookup fee of $30 and a rate of $16 per month for

residences, and a hookup fee of $50 and a monthly

Next year, the local telephone company expects to

apparatus for all telephone service in the city.

rate of $21 Yor businesses.

provide electronic switching

Cable buried beneath the

streets will be able to serve an ultimate capacity of l,300s phones.

The earth satellite station has a capacity for additional functions such as

real time radio and television news broadcasts, broadcasts of the affairs of

the borough government to North Slope communities, and educational broadcasting.

Once the $25,000 stations are provided to each of the eight borough communities, the North Slope Borough will have the capacity for providing such

communications services.

1

-132-
BARROW TRANSPORTATION

TRANSPORTATION

The only passenger transportation available between Barrow and other communities is by airplane. All cargo is delivered by barge or supply ship in

summer, or by large cargo planes year round. There are two airports in the

community, but no marine facility for off-loading cargo.

Overland transportation is largely restricted to snowmobile transport to

hunting and fishing camps in the area. Some specialized use is made of

tractors and all-terrain vehicles to transport supplies overland to petroleum exploration base camps in National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska (NPR-A).

None of the roads in the community is paved. Their condition varies between

wide, well-maintained gravel surfaces, to narrow, soft or badly eroding

roads. Sidewalks are non-existent and pedestrian safety is jeopardized by

reckless snowmachine driving.

.: ‘:

.-

-133-
BARROW

P

TRANSPORTATION

Air Transportation

AIR TRANSPORTATION

The City of Barrow is served by commercial air transportation to the Stateowned airport south of the village; and by military aircraft to the Navyowned airstrip at the NARL base.

Operations

Mien Air Alaska has regularly scheduled service to the Wiley Post/Will

Rogers Memorial Airport at Barrow. As of this writing, however, Wien pilots

are on strike, and the community must depend upon more costly air transportation via smaller carriers. Wien’s normal service is daily during winter

and twice daily during summer via scheduled Boeing 737 jets from Fairbanks.

Other scheduled service is two or three times a week via nine-seat Frontier

Flying Service aircraft, and Great Northern Airlines, Inc., jet from Fairbanks.

One-way passenger fares from Fairbanks to Barrow via Wi en are $77.24, and

via Frontier Flying Service are $123.26.

Inter-regional air transportation has increased significantly both before

and after discovery of oil on the North Slope in 1968. Between 1966 and 1970,

the total number of revenue passengers boarding scheduled and unscheduled

aircraft at Barrow nearly doubled, from 4682 passengers in1966, to 9119 in

1970. In 1975 the number of enplaned passengers rose to 12,000 (FAA, 1976).

The current and anticipated aeronautical activity at Barrow is indicated on

Table 1.

The airport also receives unscheduled cargo planes such as C-130 Hercules

aircraft carrying goods for the community as well as for certain operations

of NARL. Navigational aids allow for 24-hour per day, all-weather landings

throughout the year.

Cargo is moved via U.S. Postal Service parcel post and air-freighted by

B

private air carriers. The two principal inter-regional mail carriers are

Wien Air Alaska and Alaska Airlines. Although airmail costs are considerably

lower than air freight costs, airmail is restricted to relatively small ,

-134-
B

BARROW TRANSPORTATION

Air Transportation

TABLE 1

AERONAUTICAL ACTIVITY

Type of Activity Actual FY FY

1975 1978 1979 1987

Total Operations (000)

Total Itinerant (000}

Air Carrier

General Aviation

Air Taxi

Instrument Approaches

Enplaned passengers (000)

Air Carrier

Air Taxi

Based Aircraft

8

7

2

3

2

124

12

0

4

67

8

2

4

2

14

5

5

70 115

9 15

2 3

5 6

2 6

209 345

15 24

5 “ 17

6. 8

Source: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration.

Alaskan Region Ten Year Plan 1978-1987. Anchorage, 1976: 1 v.

(various pagings)

. ..+ .-

-135-
BARROW TRANSPORTATION

Air Transportation

light cargo. Air freight and Hercules-type aircraft handle nearly all of

the total tonnage delivered to North Slope communities. Air freight is

handled by major airlines as well as air taxi companies (as opposed to

schedule or contract carriers), using large commercial jets to ship

specialized cargo. For example, the North Slope Borough chartered the

Air Force’s largest propeller-driven aircraft, a C-133B, to transport its

new 24 foot long by 7 foot wide, 20-ton electrical generator to Barrow in

November 1976.

The Wiley Post/Will Rogers Memorial Airport is also used as a transfer point

for scheduled aircraft originating at Wainwright and charter operations to

other communities or hunting and fishing areas. British Petroleum has a

daily round trip Twin Otter flight to Prudhoe Bay for commuting employees.

Most NARL operations are via contract and charter aircraft. Generally, the

Hercules aircraft is utilized for support of oil exploration efforts for

drill rig moves, cement and fuel hauling and transportation of outsized

cargo. The Lockheed Electra is used for general cargo resupply and passenger

movement. Helicopters are used for oil exploration survey, sdouting and

cleanup operations (U.S. Dept. of the Navy, 1977). It is

both the State airport and the NARL strip will be used in

current exploration program.

Airport Facilities

The Wiley Post/Will Rogers Airport

It is located on a 732-acre parcel

anticipated that

support of the

was planned and built in the early 1960’s.

of State-owned land adjacent to the older,

southern portion of Barrow. Its location was determined by an existing

underlying gravel bar. The runw.ayhas a 9 inch asphalt-type surface which

is 6500 feet long and 150 feet wide, aligned perfectly with the easterly

prevailing winds. It has a paved taxiway and apron.

Navigational aids include the recently-installed FAA Very High Frequency

Omnirange and Tactical Air Navigation (VORTAC) facility south of the airport,
BARROW TRANSPORTATION

Air Transportation

radio communications facilities, FAA UHF, VHF directional finder, and

visual landing aids (lights). Other approach aids include high intensity

runway and medium intensity taxiway. lighting.

Facilities at the airport include limited fueling tanks (particularly as

contrasted to NARL), the FAA Flight Service Station, and air charter service

hangar (air taxi-guided hunts and scenic tours), offices of the State Division

of Aviation, and a new Wien terminal, which is under construction.

The 5000-foot airstrip at the NARL base was built in 1946 adjacent to the

beach along a northeast-southwest alignment. In 1963 approximately 70

percent of the strip was destroyed during a storm. In 1964 steel planking

was laid in the center 50 feet of the 150 foot wide surface. Although the

steel deck is painted with an anti-skid paint, it is extremely slippery

when wet (H.V. Lounsbury & Associates, Airport Facilities Study, n.d.)

Facilities at NARL include a terminal building, storage warehouses and two

hangars, one built in 1970. Extensive fueling facilities consist of five

tanks totalling 2,385,000 gallons for gasoline and JP-5 jet fu@l. The runway and taxiway are illuminated with high intensity

aids consist of two rotating homing beacons, ground

and wind-measuring equipment.

In addition to the air strip at NARL, a float plane

the summer on Middle Salt Lagoon, south of the camp.

lighting. Navigational

to air.radio communication

air strip is operated in

In winter, planes

fitted with skis are used on two ice strips in Imikpuk Lake, just north of

the camp. These small operations are essential to reach outlying research

sites. Facilities at the summer strip consist of fuel tanks and a vehicular

approach. Aircraft landing on the ice use the same fueling facilities as

the wheeled aircraft (John Graham& Company, 1973).

L.

-137-
BARROW TRANSPORTATION

Air Transportation

AIR TRANSPORTATION ISSUES

Safety, economy of operation, and airport or industrial facilities expansion

capability are some of the important issues of air transportation in Barrow.

The NARL airstrip is maintained to serve the needs of Arctic research, the

DEW Line station, and oil exploration in NPR-A. The better-equipped State

airport at Barrow also meets NARL needs as well as its own. The need for

two’ airports in a community of less than 3,000 people, however, is open

to question.

The NARL airstrip is poorly oriented to the prevailing easterly winds. The

three rows of quonset-type buildings of the research camps are located on

the east side of the last 3000 feet of the runway approach pattern. Normal

landings from the southwest subject the camp to potential danger if crosswinds are strong.

The 1973 Barrow Master Plan suggested that consideration be given to consolidation of the Navy operation at the Barrow airport. Not only is’the Barrow

airport equipped with navigational aids for all-weather operatjon, but its

orientation to prevailing winds is much safer than at NARL. Further, the

Barrow strip is protected from the effects of storm surges which could again

destroy the NARL airstrip.

.

The greatest limitation of this consolidation would appear to be the apparent

loss of the six fuel storage tanks at the NARL base. Since the Barrow airport

is unequipped with fuel tanks, new ones would have to be built near the

coast to receive fuels pumped from fuel barges, but close enough to the apron

to allow for pumping from the tanks into aircraft.

~, .-.. .-,

Both the State and the Borough can respond to expansion requirements at the

Barrow airport. The State Division of Aviation’s position in responding to

industrial activity such as construction of storage tanks, or supporting

Outer Continental Shelf oil exploration or development, would be if consistent

with State policy, to make undeveloped land surrounding the airport available

for lease. Improvements by the federal government or private industry would

-138-
B

BARROW TRANSPORTATION

Air Transportation

include expansion of existing apron and servicing areas. The division would

try to restrict the warehousing activities to privately owned land near the

airport (Harry Shawbach, State Div.-of Aviation).

The Borough has land south of the airport which has been designated for

future industrial or warehouse development. This parcel of land is identified

as Block “B”. It is approximately 3/4 mile wide and extends south of the

airport along the coast approximately 1-1/2 miles. Portions of Block “B”

have been platted by BLM.

Expansion capability of the NARL base has not been analyzed, but informal

assessment indicates that space exists along the coastline within the 4500

acre research tract, but not contiguous to the NARL camp. The presence of

two lakes -- Imikpuk to the north and Middle Salt Lagoon to the south --

restricts the linear expansion of the camp.

B

.

.

-139-
BARROW TRANSPORTATION

Marine Transportation

MARINE TRANSPORTATION

CURRENT MARINE TRANSPORTATION -

Marine transportation to Barrow consists of annual deliveries of community

goods via cargo ship and supplies to NARL (in support of its Arctic research

operations and NPR-A petroleum exploration operations) via barge. Because

of shallow waters off Barrow (only approximately 6 feet deep to 1000 feet

offshore), it is

that come ashore

one to two miles

craft kept abord

necessary to lighter all goods except petroleum products

through hoses. The BIA cargo ship Northstar III anchors

off of Barrow and lighters cargo using four LCM landing

the ship. Under ice conditions, goods have been transported by helicopter to shore.

The Northstar III delivers supplies to the Barrow Hospital and the village

once a year, in early September. The Northstar is based in Seattle, the

major gathering point for freight moving to northwest Alaska and the North

Slope. Tonnage delivered via the Northstar III has varied each year in

response to needs (see Table 2).

.

Since the transfer of the BIA schools to the Borough in 1975, the Northstar

has carried less cargo for the BIA and more for the Borough and others,

such as the City, PHS, store owners and private individuals. The ship has the

capacity to carry 8,000 to 12,000 gallons of fuel oil and refrigeration to

carry frozen food. Also shipped are snowmobiles, lumber for houses (but

no prefabricated units) and other construction materials. Last year 7,000

sacks of cement were shipped to the PHS Hospital in Barrow (David Jallie,

Bureau of Indian Affairs).

The total amount of cargo carried=during the last few years had fallen off,

due to the fact that aircraft were carrying more perishable foods and the

BIA’s requirements were not as extensive. The cargo shipped is once again

increasing, however, as more construction and development is taking place.

A total of 5,594 tons of cargo were shipped by the cargo ships and all other

barges to Barrow in 1975, including 358 tons of goods to the PHS Hospital,

-140-
BARROW

D

TRANSPORTATION

Marine Transportation

TABLE 2

CARGO DELIVERED TO BARROW VIA NORTHSTAR 111

Year

1975-1977

1974

1973

1972

1971

1970

1968

1967

!!ww

103

101

99

97

95

91

89

I!n!EE

800-1500

561

2431

1020

773

1257

1767

1920

Source: David Jallie, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Seattle Liason Office.

.

,.

.

-141- “

,
BARROW TRANSPORTATION

Marine Transportation

3779 tons to NARL in support of PET-4 operations, and 1857 tons forNARL

activities (U.S. Navy/Air Force Estimates, 1975). This does not include

additional cargos such as the new Barrow power utility poles and prefabricated houses, which have been sent by special barges. The total annual

tonnage remained at approximately 6,000 tons between 1967 and 1975.

MARINE TRANSPORTATION ISSUES

Continued oil exploration in NPR-A will require approximately 20,000 tons

of cargo to be shipped to Barrow each year until 1982 -- during which time

the Navy plans to drill 19 more exploratory wells (Stefano-Mesplay and

Associates, Inc., August 1975) . Fuel will constitute a significant portion

of this cargo requirement. Each of the 19 wells will require 500,000 to

600,000 gallons of fuel (for a medium-depth well) for site preparation,

drilling, abandonment and camp use. Based upon storage tank capacity of

Barrow and the other supply base at the Lonely DEW Line station, it is

estimated that Barrow will supply approximately 35 percent of the fueling

requirements for the planned exploration program.

In order tocapitalize upon future exploration and developmen~of oil and

gas and other natural resources, the North Slope Borough proposed the fundin9

of a Barrow port facility in its 1974/75 to 1979/80 Capital’ Improvements

Program (Alaska International Academy, 1974). The site to be investigated

is on the western, or Chukchi Sea, side of the tip of Point Barrow. According

to the proposal, the effects of ice scour result in a channel approximately

32 feet in depth almost at the shoreline. Sheet piling-would be driven

around an area to be excavated of approximately 300 feet by 500 feet.

The completed dredged harbor wou~ct-apparently be protected from the pressures

of pack ice by the sheet piling. It would serve the port requirements of

the City of Barrow, NARL operations and NPR-A oil exploration. By eliminating

cargo lightening, it is hoped that such a port could reduce freight rates.

B

. .

-142-
BARROW

B

TRANSPORTATION

Marine Transportation

Federal and State funding was identified for the estimated $10 million

project. The source of federal monies was identified as the Army Corps of

Engineers Civil Works Program. As of 1974, legislation was pending in the

Alaska State Legislature for the State’s portion ($2.5 million).

Recent studies (Parker, 1972; and Stefano-Mesplay, 1975] however, have concluded that the construction of a marine facility at Barrow is not feasible

because of a lack of protection from sea ice and storms. Compared to other

potential port sites along the Arctic coast, the sand spit north of Barrow

has some good advantages: proximity to deep water, good gravel base, and

proximity to Barrow. However, its low level terrain has a history of being

inundated by high seas and ice storms.

In the absence of a suitable port development site in the area and region,

the Stefano-Mesplay report reconnnends certain North Slope Borough improvements

B

to existing operations, including:

● Acquisition of modern lightening shuttle craft;

\

● Development of oil and gas staging areas; .

● Development of offloading ramps and paths;

e Construction of warehouses, institution of harbormaster

control of operations; and

● Investigation of new techniques of barge-to-shore offloading.

,,.

.

“ -143-
BARROW TRANSPORTATION

Road Transportation

ROAD TRANSPORTATION

CURRENT ROAD TRANSPORTATION

Barrow has approximately fifteen miles of gravel surfaced roads. The most

important linkages include a four-mile road between Browerville and the

NARL site, and a three-mile road to Lake Emaiksoun, the village’s principal

water source. The existing system and its planned improvements are shown

on Figure 3 .

Roads in the city are constructed of gravel directly on top of the tundra to

a depth of about three to five feet. New roads planned for construction in

Block “A” are five feet thick and only twelve feet wide, while other arterials

are planned for 18 feet in width. Gravel cost is estimated

cubic yard.

Normally, a binder material such as clay fines is placed in

inches of the beach gravel fill to create a solid base th t

or erode. During summer months the primary roads are oiled

at $10 per

the upper 18

does not slump

to reduce dust.

.

Road conditions vary according to the time of year, frequency of use and

maintenance, and localized conditions of erosion near the beach. Spring

thaw undermines roadways, particularly in sections where little or no binder

materials have been used for the sub-base. In these cases, gravel varies

thickness and softness and becomes highly unstable, particularly for twoand three-wheeled motorcycles.

in

Because there is no storm drainage system in the city, runoff is damned by

the raised roadways, until breached by floodwaters. Occasionally, sections

of the road

This causes

Maintenance

in the city

(BIA) until

near the coast are washed out and made temporarily impassable.

considerable inconvenience and requires extensive reconstruction.

of roads in Barrow is costly and frequent. All streets and roads

were constructed and maintained by the Bureau of Indian Affairs

1974, when the Borough received transfer of equipment, and assf.imed

-144-
BARROW TRANSPORTATION

Road Transportation

responsibility for maintenance. Some capital improvements funds have been

used to maintain BIA road equipment. NSB maintenance includes the threemile road to the water source. The. road from Browerville to NARL is maintained by the Navy.

The Borough’s Capital Improvements Program (CIP) for FY 1974 through FY 1980

authorized funding for road improvements and drainage construction ($303,000)

and street lights ($2 million). The Draft 1977 Capital Improvements Program

showed an expenditure of $348,000 by January 31, 1977, of a total of $588,000

for construction of a storm drainage culvert system and provision of additional gravel on the roads and streets of Barrow. Costs for new roads planned

in Block “A” and improvements to three other streets (Stevenson, Montegana,

and 10-Plex) total $943,000. The CIP has been suspended, however, because

of oil company-initialed

its tax rate.

Road Use

Roads in Barrow are used

additional three-wheeled

machines. Narrow roads,

dangerous conditions for

litigation against the North Slope Borough

by an estimated 200 automobiles and trucks

.

and conventional motorcycles, and numerous

made more restricted by snow accumulation,

over

3

snow

create

pedestrians. This condition is e~acerbated by reckless and apparently random driving of snow machines both off and on the roads.

The snow machine is the most frequent form of vehicular transportation in

Barrow. Individual homes may have as many as eight or ten machines parked

around them, in various states of repair. The machines are driven on

roads and between houses, where they occasionally strike natural gas pipes

serving the houses. Collisions rtu~only endanger the driver, but occasionally

rupture the pipe. Although fire potential is great, fortunately this has

not yet occurred.

-145-
BARROW TRANSPORTATION

Road Transportation

Snow machines are used over snow as well as over gravel. During spring

break-up, their movements are directed between patches of snow on roadways.

Hence, driving is often erratic and.dangerous. Perhaps their noisy operation signals unsuspecting pedestrians of their arrival, thereby preventing

some mishaps. The machines are unlicensed, however, and their use is

apparently not policed by the Borough.

Similar problems of pedestrian safety and road maintenance exist at the

Naval Arctic Research Laboratory (NARL). The Barrow Regional Master Plan

(John Graham & Company, 1973) discussed the extreme safety hazards due to

conflict between vehicles and pedestrians in the existing camp plan. The

main camp consists of four main access routes between parallel rows of

facilities and the beach, but vehicular traffic is not confined to this

road system. Wheeled vehicular traffic is permitted any place on the gravel

fill which will support the vehicles, including smaller access areas between

buildings. Camp speed limits set at 15 mph and 5 mph for the family housing

area are generally unenforced because speedometers become inoperative due

to the rigors of the Arctic climate.

.

Maintenance at the NARL base is extremely costly because of drifting snow.

Because the roadway system is not aligned with the predominately easterly

winter winds, substantial snow drifting occurs between buildings. The

Barrow Region Plan indicates that thousands of dollars are spent on snow

removal each year in these areas.

ROAD TRANSPORTATION ISSUES

Important issues related to Barrow’s road system include the need for sidewalks, improvement of the major collector road through the city, construction of an alternative road connecting Barrow to Browerville and NARL, and

the local availability of gravel for road construction and maintenance.

-146-
BARROW TRANSPORTATION

Road Transportation

Footpaths

Pedestrian safety in Barrow is increasingly problematic. The raised, narrow

roads present little rom for foot traffic. There is often no space off

the roadway because of snow accumulation from road plowing. In addition,

the front yards of houses are often crowded with snow machines and other

equipment.

The increasing number of automobiles, trucks, snow machines and other vehicular traffic is creating hazardous conditions for pedestrians. The problem

seems to be less a function of the volume of traffic on these roads (which

is not great) than a function of reckless driving and restricted road width.

The North Slope Borough has included two projects in its Draft 1977 Capital

Improvements Program, which when funded, may alleviate some of the problems.

Funds totalling $300,000 have been identified for the construction of foot

paths. The project is dependent upon State commitment of funds. The second

project calls for provision of street lighting, but no specific areas of

the city are identified. The extent of existing lighting is unknown. The

long winter periods of darkness make good lighting imperativej both for

drivers and pedestrians.

.

It would appear that regulation of vehicular traffic is a necessary component

of any improvements program, particularly the construction of footpaths.

Given the propensity of snow machine drivers to utilize any available path,

pedestrian safety, even on footpaths, could be jeopardized without adequate

and enforced restrictions on snow machine use.

Collector Road Maintenance

,,..

The North Slope Borough has requested the addition of a major collector ‘

road in Barrow to the Federal Aid Secondary Highway System (North Slope

Borough, 1976). The 1.4-mile segment now extends from the Barrow terminal

area, down Diogok Street in the center of the village, and through Browerville

to the NARL road. It serves to link the post office to the airport, and

is a public school bus route. It provides access to the barge off-loading

-147-
BARROW TRANSPORTATION

Road Transportation

sites along the beach road to NARL, and to the sanitary dump near the :

incinerator plant at NARL. Other major facilities along the route include

the hotel, bank, fire station and theplanned ASRC Administration Building

and the planned State Service Building.

The purpose of this request is to provide relief to the Borough from local

road maintenance costs. Based on experience with the spine road at Prudhoe

Bay, the North Slope Borough estimates an annual maintenance cost in excess

of $25,000 per mile for the collector road.

An earlier request to the State Highway Department for FAS designation was

rejected (April 1976). The State suggested that funds under a Local

Service Roads and Trails (LSR&T) Program would be more suitable. However,

the LSR&T Program does not provide maintenance funds.

An alternative source of funds -- revenue sharing -- has been deemed grossly

inadequate because only $1500 per mile would be available. In terms of

priorities, the Borough is particularly concerned that improvements using

State and federal funds for local road improvements proceed before any

commitments are made to that portion of the trans-Alaska pipeline haul road that

is within the North Slope Borough’s boundaries. However, jhe Borough

Planning Department notes that the State Department of Highway’s Six-Year

Transportation Construction Program, January 1977, has no improvements

projected for any communities in the entire region.

Alternative Access Between Barrow and Browerville

A portion of the collector road for which the North Slope Borough is currently

seeking Federal Aid Secondary Highway maintenance funds is located along the

beach between Barrow and Browerville. Spring thaw occasionally makes this

road impassable. In addition, beach erosion, accelerated by past gravel

removal threatens the entire beach road. Coastal erosion in some places

is nearly five feet per year. Relocation of the road away from the beach

in 1969 and recent construction of a section of sea wall (using gravel

ballasted steel tanks] have been unsuccessful in stopping roadbed erosion.

-148-
BARRO1 TRANSPORTATION

Road Transportation

Consequently, studies were undertaken to provide an alternative, all-weather

road access between Barrow and Browerville (John Graham & Company, 1973).

One of the alternatives discussed in that report, a beach bypass road located

along the top of a dam across Isatkoak Lagoon, will be built using Public

Health Service (PHS] and Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) funds. The dam is

being built by the PHS to impound a sufficient capacity of water to supply

the city for one year. It is estimated to be completedin mid-1978. A

road will be built across the top of the dam from Block “A” to Browerville,

where it will connect with the collector road from the beach.

When the PHS water supply project was authorized, the BIA provided the

necessary funds to widen the dam so it could be used as a roadway. According

to engineers in the PHS, the BIA dam surface will be paved with “soil cement”,

sufficient in strength (1,000 psi) to handle light vehicles only. Since heavy

vehicles could damage or destroy the dam, this road could have limited usefulness as an emergency all-weather bypass to the coastal road.

A road to connect to the damon the south side of the lagoon was begun by

the NSB in the summer of 1976, but was suspended because of lack of funds.

A total of $458,000 was originally authorized, a portion of which was set

aside for road improvements in Block “A”. .

Consequently, the Borough has requested State assistance in constructing this

road, under an Off Road System (ORS) project funding program. This road

would follow an extension of Okpik Street, one block north of the airport,

and continue east and north approximately .7 miles to the dam.

Gravel Availability .,.

.

An important consideration in plans for construction or improvement of

roads, as well as for other large scale construction in the community, is

the availability of gravel. Gravel is needed as a sub-base for roads,

buildings (in areas of ice lenses where placement of pilings is difficult),

and it figures importantly in some plans for elevating large land areas

to improve surface drainage.

-149-
BARROW TRANSPORTATION

Road Transportation

Planned construction of platted roads in Block “A”, or potential construction

of roads for new housing east of Browerville, could require significant

quantities of gravel. Industrial development in Block “B” could require

new gravel roads and gravel paths for heavy construction.

Unfortunately, gravel remains in short supply in Barrow. Traditionally,

gravel had been obtained from the Chukchi Sea beach, the only source where

it could be easily removed without damage to permafrost. Several million

cubic yards have been removed from the beach for federal projects since the

1940’s, until that process was stopped in 1973, due to an increasing

beach and beach road erosion.

In 1973, the City began gravel excavations from a pit estimated to have about

a million cubic yards, located on the beach at the west end of the airport

runway (Dupere & Associates, 1973). A study by J.C. LaBelle of the Arctic

Institute of North America in 1973 indicated that gravel was available in

commercial quantities (one million cubic yards) from two inland sources

located on Navy land about five miles from the community.

.

Recently the village was given interim conveyance to the surface rights to

these sites and any others within a 200,000 square mile area around the

city. The ASRC has begun an assessment program to determine the location of

other gravel sites within the area. Hopefully, reliable and economic sources

can be located that will meet the community’s needs for residential road

expansion as well as satisfy its demands for future use in building pads.

Without these sources, Barrow could be forced ’to limit its expansion, increase

its residential densities, and increase its construction costs for large

scale development such as industry-;

-150-
BARROW COMMUNITY CONTACTS

COMMUNITY CONTACT S

Adams, Jacob. Mayor, City of Barrow.

Ahvakana, Nelson. President of Upgeagvik Inupiat Corp.

Austin,

Bartel ,

Hopson,

Jallie,

Morgan,

Neakok,

Frank. Planning Staff, Alaska Region, Federal Aviation Administration.

Herbert. Planning Director, North Slope Borough

Eben, Sr. Mayor, North Slope Borough.

David. Bureau of Indian Affairs, Seattle Office. “

Donald L. Planning Staff, Alaska, Federal Aviation Administration.

Viny. Director, NSB Div. of Conservation and Environmental Security.

Reitmeier, Paul F. Manager, Industrial Marketing, RCA, Anchorage.

Shawbach, Harry. Acting Director, Alaska Div. of Aviation, Anchorage.

Stotts, Harry J. Acting Public Works Director, City of Barrow.

B

Tegoseak, William E. Manager, City of Barrow

Wolfe, Dean. Barrow Utilities and Electric CO-6P, Inc.

.

.

-151-
B

BARRON

BIBLIOGRAPH Y

Alaska. Dept. of Natural Resources.

plan (1976-1980). Anchorage,

Alaska International Academy. North

Div. of Parks. Alaska outdoor recreation

September 1976.

Slope !30rough capital improvements program,

fiscal 1974/75-1979/80. Anchorage, 1979: 209 p.

Arctic Slope Regional Corporation. 1976 shareholders report. Barrow, 1977:

37 p.

Balding, G.O. Water availability, quality, and use in Alaska. Open file

report 76-513. Anchorage, U.S. Dept of the Interior, Geological Survey,

1976: 236 p.

Barrow, City of. Proposal for a City of Barrow interim potable water supply

sys tern. Barrow, 1973.

.

Barrow installs. gas turbine generator system. Alaska Construction and Oil,

February, 1977: 28-30.

.

First corporation wins conveyance under settlement. Anchorage Times, June 4,

1977.

Hewitt V. Lctunsbury & Associates. Proposed storm drainage plan for Barrow,

Alaska. Anchorage, 1973: 1 p.

ITT Arctic Services, Inc. Military wat~r use at distant early warning radar

sites and the Naval Arctic research laboratory. n.d.

John Graham and Company. Barrow regional master plan, Barrow, Alaska. The

Barrow Intergovernmental Coordinating Committee and Western Division,

Naval Facilities Engineering Command, May 1973: 100 p.

-152-
B

BARROW BIBLIOGRAPHY

Navy sets lower consumer rates from South Barrow field. Arctic Coastal Zone

Management Newsletter, January 1977.

New gas discovery at South Barrow 14. Arctic Coastal Zone Management Newsleter,

February 1977: 6.

North Slope Borough. Draft 1977 capital improvements program--Barrow Village

project schedule. Barrow, 1977: 19 p.

----- North Slope borough - general information and economic factors. Barrow,

1976: 45 p.

----- Progress report on the Barrow planning and coordination effort to develop

an interim community water supply and sanitation system and to develop

a maximum number of acceptable home loan applications for new or improved

residential facilities. Barrow, 1973: 15 p.

. .

Stefano-Mesplay and Assoc. ,Inc. Feasibility study of a North Slope-Borough

marine facility. Anchorage, Aug. 1975.

.

Stenmark, Richard, and Thomas H. Schoder. Resources inventory: Arctic region:

recreation and preservation opportunities. Anchorage, Joint Federal-State

Land Use Planning Commission, 1974: 80 p.

U.S. Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare. Indian Health Service. Project

summary for sanitation faciliti~ construction - phase II, City of

Barrow, Alaska. Fairbanks, 1974: 16 p.

U.S. Dept. of the Interior. Bureau of Indian Affairs. Planning Support Group.

Report for the justification of the federal government to upgrade the

gas pipeline distribution system in Barrow, Alaska. Juneau, Report 244,

1976.

-153-
r

BARROW BIBLIOGRAPHY

Us.

—. ..=. —. .—- ..=..- ___ -. . ..—

Dept. of the Interior. Fish and Wildlife Service. Winter water availability

and use conflicts as related to fish and wildlife in Arctic Alaska - a

Us.

synthesis of information. Anchorage, 1977: 222 p.

Dept. of the Navy. Final environmental impact statement: continuing

exploration and evaluation of naval petroleum reserve no. 4, Alaska.

Washington, Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale

Urban and Rural Systems Associates. An analysis

Alaska of the Alaskan Arctic Gas Pipeline

January 1974: 360 p.

Reserve Office, 1977: 400 p.

of the socioeconomic impact in

Company pipeline. San Francisco,

.

.

-154-
Kaktovik Community Study

.

.
KAKTOVIK INTRODUCTION

INTRODUCTION

Kaktovik is-a Native village of fewer than 140 people, located on a coastal

island in the East Arctic. It lies 360 air miles east of Barrow, 130 miles.

east of Prudhoe Bay and approximately 90 miles west of the Canadian border.

The village and the nearby Bar-Main DEW Line station are situated on the

northeast coast of Barter Island, one of the largest barrier islands in

a forty-mile-long chain. The island is seven mi~es long and five miles wide

and is separated from the mainland by Kaktovik Lagoon, which is three and

a half miles wide. Kaktovik took its name from the Eskimo word meaning

“seining place”, referring to the excellent net fishing in the lagoon.

Kaktovik began as the historic settlement of Elupak, a traditional Taremiut

village, where goods were traded with the villagers from Nigalik on the

Colville River to the west, and with the coastal Eskimos of the Canadian

arctic to the east. It served as a distribution center for necessary items

for hunting, fishing and trapping. “Barter Island” was so named because it

was one of the four great trading centers of the northern abor~ginal Eskimos

(uRSA, 1974).

*

With the arrival of European whalers, missionaries, explorers and prospectors

in the nineteenth century, these trading patterns began to break down. By

1923, the first settlement was established in the form of a trading post.

However, Kaktovik residents largely maintained their traditional subsistence

lifestyle until the 1940’s, when a portion of Barter Island was developed

as a radar base to monitor aircraft movements. In 1947, the village was

forced to relocate by the Air Force in order to build

the island. Gradually, education, medical and public

programs were introduced.

a landing strip on

assistance, and housing

In 1953, the Bar-Main DEW Line station was built, apparently requiring another

village relocation. Many male residents became salaried employees. The

station also brought in an influx of white men as well as Natives from other

villages.

-155-
-. . .~:.: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................................... ........

. . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... ....................... :.:...:...:. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .:.:.:. ~.~.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. ~.}~.: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Y. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

... . . .... . . ... .. .. . . . .. . . .. .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . .. . . ... . . .. . .

~i:,

*. . . .. . . . .. . . .. .. . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .........................................

.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............................................

...................................... /55 .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... ............... .................

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ . . . . . &. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................... :;.: “~ .. ...... u

.

~ -..:.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............... ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .............. ,. :: w

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ....................... . . . . .................... . .....

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............. ............. . . ..................... ........ ...................... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -:.:-:.: -:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... :.:.:.:.: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . /.-.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... ............................................ $ . . . .

.~,....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . ... . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . ... . . ... .. .. . .. ... . . . .. . . ... . . .. .. . ... . . . .. . . .... . .... . . . .. .. .. .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. ...... ........

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............. ............

.. . . .. . . . ... . .... . . .. .. . . .. . . .... ... . . .... . . .. .. . .. . . ... .. . . .. . . .. . . . ... . . . .. . . . .. .. .. .. . . ... . . ... . . ..... ... . . . .. . . . . ... . . .................. ........

.. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ...................... ..

... . ... . . ... .. .... . .. . ..... . . . . . . . .. . ..... . . .... . .. . . .... . . . .. . . .. . .. ... . . . .. .. ... . . . ... . . ... . . . .. . . ... . . . .. . . . .. . . .. .. . . . ....................... ...

... . .. . . ..... .. .. . . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . .... . . .. ... .. ... ... . .. .. . . . .. . . ..... ... . . . .. . . ..... . ... . . .. . . . .. . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . .. . . . ..........................

... . .. . . .... . . ... . . .... . . .. . . . . . . . .. . .. .... . .. .. . .. . .. ... ... .. .. ... .. .... . . . . . . . .. . .... . .. .. . ..... . ..... . .. . . . ... . . . ... . ......... ...................

... . . . . . . .... .... . . ..... ... . . . . .. . .. . . . . .. . . .. . .. .. . .. ... .. ... .. .... . ... . . . .. . . . .. ...... . . ... . . .. .. . .. .. . . .. .. . .. . . . . . ... ........................ ....

..... ... . . .. . ..... . .. . .. ... . . . . . . .. . . ..... . . .. .. ... .. . ... . . . .. . .. .. . .. ..... .. . .. .. .. . ... . . . .. . . . ... . .. .. . . .. . . . .. .. . ... .. .................... .......

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .............. ...., ......

> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.. . . .. . . .. ... . .. . . .. .. . ... . . .. . . ... . . .... . . ... . . ... . ..... . . .. . .. .. . .. .... . .. . . . . . . ........ .. ... .. . .. . .. . . . .. . . .. .. .. ... .. . ....... .................

... . .. ... . .... .. ... .. ... .. . . . . . .. . . .... . .. . . . .. . ... ..... . .... . .. . . .... . . . .. . . ..... . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. . ... . . .... ................

.. . . 2 .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.. . . ... . . ..... . .. . . ......... . .. . . . .. . ..... . . . .. . . .. .. . .... .. .. .. . ... ..... . . . .. . . .. . . . .. .. . ... . . . .. . . . . .. . .. .. . . ... . . . . ... . .............. .........

> . . . ..% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. . .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. . .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

.

.

. .

.

. . .

.

.

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. . .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. . .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. .

.

. ..............

. . . . . . . . . . .

-~-

.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......................

... . ... . . ... ... .. . .... . . ... . .... . ... . .. ... . . ... ... ... . . ... ... .. . . .... . . .. . . ... . . ... . . . . .. . . . .. . . .. .. . . .. .. . .. . .. .. . . .. .. . . ................... .....

... ... . . . .... .. .. . ... . ..... ..... . . .. .. .... . . . .. . . ... . . . ... ... .. . . . ... . .... . . ... . . .. . . .. .. . . ... . . .. . . . . .. .. . .. .. . ... . . . .. . . .............. .........

. .. . . .. .. ...... .. . ... . .. .... . . .. .. ... . . ... .. . ... .. .. . . . ... . . ... .. . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . . . .. .. . ... .... . . . . .. . . .. . . . ... . . . . . . ..... .................

.......! . ..... . .. .... .. . ... . . ... . . .... . .... . . ... . . .. . . . ... .. . .. . . . .. . . .. .. . . .. . . . .. . . .. .. . .. .. . . . .. . . .. .. . . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . .... ........... ....

.... . ... ..... .. .. . .... . .... .. .... ...... .... .. ... . . .. . . . ...... ... . ... . ... .. ..... . . ... . .. .. ... .. . ..... . .... . . ... . . . .. . . . .............. .......

$

- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .............

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .............

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...........

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

z . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .....

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . >. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

i! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . ..J . . . ... . . ...... . .. .. ..... . .. ... .. .. . ... ... . .. .. . .. . ... . .... ... . .... ... .... . . . .. . . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. . . . . . . . .. ... .. ... . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

..:.:.:.:

t. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.... ... . ..... . . .... ... ... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ::::::,.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :::Y

.................................................................................................

......................................................................................................:.:.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

..................................................................................................

... .. . . ... ... ... . .. . . ..... . . ... . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . ... . . .. .. . .. . . . . ... . ... .. . . .. .. ... . . a

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . +... -.-...-.-.......-.....-...-...-..,-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E::EW%S$SZSZ%:.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

:$=~=~~~.=’=~~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..- .

.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

,?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.~..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

I

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:......................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

..>..~ . . . . . . . . . . . . ...>

r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

.

.. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.. . . . . . . .

.. . . .

.. . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

c

fig:

~:~:: :

..:.:.:. ~.: . —-.— L..-_
KAKTOVIK INTRODUCTION

In 1960, Congress established the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. The

range extended from the Canning River on the west to the Canadian border on

the east, and included all of Barter Island, with the exception of the

village area. Although access to the range by non-residents was carefully

managed, no restrictions were placed on Native subsistence requirements.

In 1964, the village was forced to move yet a third time. The Air Force

took over the traditional site, a well-drained gravel strip, and the village

was given a site with silty soils and a complete absence of gravel. The

conrnunity cemetery remained inside the DEW Line station’s boundaries (North

Slope Borough, 1974). A location adjacent to the lagoon was established and

lots were surveyed by the Bureau of Land Management. Shortly thereafter,

the Bureau of Indian Affairs

and a teacher’s apartment.

Kaktovik was incorporated as

a second class city in 1972.

the few municipal powers not

built an elementary school with two classrooms

a fourth class city in 1971, and reclassified as

As a second class city, Kaktovik may exercise

carried out by the North Slope Borough. No

public safety personnel or services are provided by the city. However, the

.

village council acts as the town’s official governing body, and it enforces

village ordinances, arbitrates disputes, and publicly reprimands those who

misbehave (URSA, 1974). .

,,

As of mid-1977, the total population of the community, including the 50 DEW

Line station employees, is estimated at approximately 190 (North Slope

Borough, 1977). The DEW Line station can house as many as 70 full-time,

non-Native employees;’ an’~ this number can doti~l%?’”dtirihg the summers ‘--

(U.S. Dept. of th=~rir, 1976). Of the 17?%TTTTage residents countd%

in 1976, all but ei’g’hl?%=re noted as Native. ‘“Meri”’b-unnumbered women, 49 to

24, and there were 47 children (URSA, 1977).

The village

and village

varies from

economy is primarily dependent upon Borough, DEW Line station

corporation employment, as well as subsistence. Employment

season to season; but there are few long term permanent jobs in

-157-
KAKTOVIK INTRODUCTION

Kaktovik. Two-thirds of the 34 fulltime and part time jobs counted in 1976

were distributed among the North Slope Borough (12), the DEW Line station (5),

and the village corporation (5).

Subsistence accounts for an estimated 40 percent of the food consumed in the

village (ibid.). In 1973, Dupere & Associates estimated that individual

resident’s dependency upon subsistence can be as high as 80 percent. A

“subsistence” economy has ceased to exist, and the maintenance of traditional

hunting and fishing activities is now contingent on a cash economy. Without

jobs needed to purchase weapons and vehicles, younger people leave the

village, and traditional patterns of hunting and fishing are being eroded

(URSA, 1977).

SUMMARY OF ISSUES

Kaktovik has been and continues to be one of the poorest communities in the

Arctic. This is reflected in almost every aspect of village life: employment,

housing, transportation and utilities services. Housing is among the oldest

and most poorly constructed in the Borough. Air and marine transportation

to the village is unreliable and roads in the area and to the ~ater source

are in poor condition. There is no piped or treated water for residential

use, and there is infrequent disposal of collected solid and liquid wastes.

.

Recent activities of the Borough and potential economic activities of the

village corporation, however, offer the potential for significant improvement.

Since the discovery of oil at Prudhoe Bay, tax revenues have accrued to the

Borough that are now finding their way into village projects. Housing is

being built which may soon replace three-quarters of the 21 units described

as dilapidated in 1973 (Dupere & Associates, 1973). Roads in the village

have been improved, and roads to the dump and water source are planned for

improvement. Installation of electrical generation and distribution and

sewage disposal and water supply systems are planned. Land development potential also exists through the recent conveyance of surface rights to approximately 65,000 acres to the village corporation.

-158-
KAKTOVIK INTRODUCTION

These and other programs will bring long-overdue improvements to Kaktovik,

but will probably not provide an infrastructure upon which major new developnmt can take place. For example, the potential for employment related to

construction of the proposed Alaskan Arctic Gas Pipeline Company pipeline

exists for some Kaktovik residents, but it is unlikely that construction or

maintenance of the pipeline would utilize any local community services

(U.S. Dept. of the Interior, 1976). The absence of a port or public airport

or large water supply could inhibit the usefulness of Kaktovik as a service

base for the pipeline or any nearshore or offshore petroleum exploration or

development. Whatever opportunity for economic development of Kaktovik exists,

it would appear that only the communications, air facilities and fuel storage

facilities at the DEW Line station would offer a potential infrastructure.

The likelihood or acceptability of such development to either the DEW Line

station or Kaktovik, however, was not assessed as part of this interim study

of community facilities.

-159-
KAKTOVIK

LAND USE

LAND USE

Land in the vicinity of Kaktovik is-used for fish and wildlife production,

and for subsistence. The area is characterized by low-lying terrain,, an

absence of vegetation, and desert-like conditions of precipitation (averaging

only 4 inches per year). The little snow which falls drifts against the shore,

protecting the village from sea storms, but makes transportation even within

the village difficult. In summer, the area is composed of thousands of

small lakes, ponds, marshes, and meandering streams which are rich waterfowl

habitats.

The Barter Island settlement is composed of the village of Kaktovik and the

DEW Line station, approximately two-thirds of a mile apart by road (See

Figure 2, Area Land Use). Facilities shared by the village and the station

include the DEW Line airstrip, located on a gravel strip extending east into

the sea; the freshwater lake, located south of the station and east of the

village; and the dump, located a short distance to the north, on the Beaufort

Sea coast.

.

Within the village, most of the land is used for privately owned residences.

Other buildings house such functions as a Bureau of IndianzAffairs school,

a Public Health Service health clinic, a community hall, a church, a post

office, a general store, a National Guard armory, an air charter service,

village corporation offices, and a village corporation-owned coffee shop

(See Figure 3, Town Site Land Use). Recreation is limited to a recently

completed community building, a church, and a BIA school.

The school complex is located west of Barter Avenue, the main street in the

townsite, and consists of the school itself, a portable classroom, a maintenance shed and fuel storage tanks. The facility lacks storage and recreation

areas. Long planned Borough construction of a community elementary education and service facility .has been suspended, since the State has undertaken

plans to provide a new school (North Slope Borough, 1977). The State’s

-160-
ml

B !!

iiii

-161-
I

. . ..<.c . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

::::jj::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:

3

-iv

PEW L

.

[Id FUELTANA\

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

.:.:.:.:. :.:+: .:.:.:.:.:- :+: .:.:.:.:

N

!#lALs Wt

.=cHAmEFL/s-ie .:~s;:z:z%?%~ i- \\:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Q

I

i

I

\

cwRw +

~ y

\

‘a? 5LWRc15”\

.

\

~e

-0 SCHOOL w&N

:!SW

\

TPNKS

CUtdMUNltY HALL

\

.

\

“\ CHURCH

@pin Dow}

TOWN SITE BoUNDARY I. .

\ \

KJWR7VI K COMMUN 17’f 5TI-KW LAND LEE

-162-
KAKTOVIK LAND USE

designs will provide for education of the 51 children presently living in

Kaktovik, with a projected capacity for as many as 75 students in 1990.

The DEW Line station is composed of-15-20 buildings of varying size, containing

such functions as communications, staff housing, aircraft maintenance, power

generators, water treatment facilities and fire fighting equipment. The FAA

maintains a Flight Service Station at the DEW Line facility (Alaska Dept. of

Highways, 1973). Firefighting equipment is also provided for fires in

Kaktovik, since the village’s Volunteer Fire Department has no equipment

(Dupere & Associates, 1973). Additionally, seven fuel storage tanks are

located at the station.

.

.

-163-
KAKTOVIK LAND USE

Subsistence

SUBSISTENCE

Land area use for subsistence around Kaktovik extends within a thirty to

forty mile radius, generally south of the community. Within this area,

residents obtain such food sources as caribou, polar bear, grizzly bear,

sheep, birds and waterfowl, and fish and sea mammals; vegetable food sources

such as blueberries, cranberries and cloudberries; and such furbearing

animals as wolverine, fox, wolf and groundsquirrel. The total monetary replacement value of subsistence foodstuffs taken by Kaktovik residents in

1973 was approximately $65,000 (U.S. Dept. of the Interior, 1976). Because

these estimates were based on Anchorage costs and did not account for transportation to Kaktovik, the estimate was undoubtedly low. In 1977, of course,

the cost of equivalent amounts of”fish and game would be much higher.

Residents spend six to seven months a year in subsistence activities and

supply 30 to 80 percent of their food requirements in this manner (Robert

R. Nathan Associates, 1974; Dupere & Associates, 1973). Fish constitutes

a significantly larger portion of the diet of Kaktovik residents than, for

example, residents of Barrow or WaCaribou, however, is the main game

Porcupine Caribou Herd crosses the

its calving ground south of Kaktov.

nwright (Resource Planning Team, 1974).

resource and is hunted year round. The

Brooks Range in its spring migration to

k in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

Hunting of the Porcupine Herd is not bound by restrictions imposed by the

Alaska Department of Fish and Game, as is the badly depleted Arctic Caribou:

Herd in the West Arctic.

SUBSISTENCE LAND USE ISSUES

Kaktovik residents have identified subsistence as the most important element

of their traditional lifestyle. At the same time that vehicles such as

snowmachines allow for increased accessibility to subsistence food sources,

there is a consensus that it is becoming more difficult for people to obtain

the food they need by hunting, fishing and berry picking. The most common

problems cited are game laws and restrictions, reduced game, competition

-164-
KAKTOVIK LAND USE

Subsistence

from outside sportsmen, development, and the cost of food and equipment

(Robert R. Nathan & Associates, 1974).

Additional limitations on subsistence resources have been associated with

construction and operation of the Alaskan Arctic Gas Pipeline Company

pipeline. The project would require transport of men and supplies to

staging areas along the coast during the summer which would cause potentially

significant

Other activbears, seal

subsistence

of the ArctIt is not

result in

on a cash

disturbance to waterfowl areas, including their displacement.

ties could cause redistribution of polar bears, caribou, grizzly

and walrus, and fish. That is, the habitats of nearly every

resource of the people of Kaktovik could be modified as a result

c Gas pipeline route (URSA, 1974).

known if a combination of existing limitations noted above will

changed subsistence areas, or inevitably will increase dependency

economy.

-165-
KAKTOVIK

RESIDENTIAL LAND USE

LAND USE

Residential Land Use

CURRENT RESIDENTIAL LAND USE

The North Slope Borough 1974/75-1979/80 Capital Improvements Program states

that Kaktovik clearly has the poorest housing in the Borough. Mith the

exception of eight prefabricated houses constructed in 1974 under the Alaska

State Housing Authority Remote Housing Program, and a teacher’s house

constructed in 1976, most housing in Kaktovik is constructed by individuals

using dunnage such as plywood, or quonset hut materials obtained secondhand

from the DEW Line station (U.S. Dept. of the Interior, 1976).

three occupied older houses in Kaktovik, twenty-one have been

the village corporation for replacement (Dupere & Associates,

Of the twentydesignated by

1973) .

Most of the housing is older than 10 years of age; and some dates from the

last relocation of the community in 1964. The housing is small (averaging

685 square feet) and generally lacks adequate insulation and plumbing. Heat

is provided by fuel oil stoves, which consume approximately four 55 gallon

drums per year (URSA, 1974).

.

In 1974, household size was 4.9 persons per dwelling unit, although fully

36 percent of the 37 houses in the village were vacant. This figure further

testifies to the e,xtreme inadequacy of the housing and the high cost of

heating (Dupere & Associates, 1974).

The eight new housing units which were constructed in 1974 were provided

under Alaska State Housing Authority’s Remote Housing Program and were

administered by the Kaktovik Village Corporation with the assistance of

Inupiat Builders Inc., the Housing Development Corporation of the Arctic

Slope Regional Corporation. Under the terms of the program, eligible

families received a grant for 75 percent of the $30,000 cost of the unit,

and financed the remained portion under a long term loan (URSA, 1974).

-166-
KAKTOVIK LAND USE

Residential Land Use

RESIDENTIAL LAND USE

Plans for replacement of dilapidated housing in Kaktovik are proceeding

under Borough direction. The recently constructed $70,000 teacher’s house

was purchased in Fairbanks and constructed by Public Works Department crews.

Seven new prefabricated houses have been shipped to Kaktovik at a cost of

$240,000, or $34,000 each. The Borough Capital Improvements Program indicates

that they will be installed in place before the end of fiscal year 1977/78.

Other housing will be replaced after a more detailed needs assessment is

made. The 1974 Six-Year CIP estimated a need for 5 additional houses during

the planning period. Demand for new housing appears to be related primarily

to the need to replace substandard housing rather than to accommodate any

significant anticipated growth.

Without new jobs, young adults continue to leave the village. Some jobs

could be created as a result of the construction and maintenance of the

proposed Alaskan Arctic Gas Pipeline Company pipeline, which could use

Kaktovik as a sub-base for maintenance (U.S. Dept. of the Interior, 1976)

.

It appears that sufficient land is available for any anticipated resident al

expansion. If none of the new housing were constructed on the same lot as

existing dilapidated housing, space would still remain to ~ccommodate approximately 30 lots within the BLM townsite. It also appears that there is -

sufficient land outside the BLM townsite, but within the city limits, to

accommodate additional growth.

The suitability of this land for development, however, has not been assessed.

Gravel necessary to fill in poorly drained areas and to provide roads to

serve new houses is in short supply. Consequently, limitations on gravel

availability may present a much more severe limitation to growth than would

available land for expansion.

-167- ‘
KAKTOVIK LAND USE

Planning

PLANNING

The City of Kaktovik lies within the boundaries of the North Slope Borough.

The Borough, whose administrative headquarters are in Barrow, has a variety

of areawide powers, many of which affect Kaktovik. Borough powers include

responsibility for streets and sidewalks; sewers and sewage treatment; water

course and flood control; telephone systems; light, power and heating

facilities; water; transportation systems; libraries; airport and aviation

facilities; garbage and solid waste collection and disposal; housing and

urban renewal,,rehabi litation and development; preservation, maintenance and

protection of historic sites (North Slope Borough, 1977).

The City of Kaktovik, while empowered with public safety and recreation

powers, effectively looks to the Borough and various federal agencies for

the financing and provision of municipal services.

-168-
LAND STATUS

LAND STATUS

Land status in the vicinity of Kaktovik has recently undergone significant

change as a result of interim conveyance of approximately 65,000 acres of

land to the Kaktovik Inupiat Corporation (See Figure4 , Kaktovik Village

Corporation Land Status). Land outside the village had formerly been

either in sole ownership of the Air Force or Department of Interior-managed

Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Because of these pre-existing federal

ownerships, only surface rights were extended to the village corporation.

Village deficiency selections of four townships outside of the refuge were

also selected. It is not known if village selections on Barter Island

required a reduction in size of the nearly seven square mile DEW Line station,

or if the village’s conveyances of surface rights were simply superimposed

upon the Air Force ownership.

Village concepts of land use are very informal. There is consensus

that land and resources are everyone’s birthright; and consequently there

is little interest in traditional land surveying functions, such as platting,

and planning and zoning. Buildings occupy lots surveyed by BLkl in 1964,

but only very casually; there is no sense of building siting related to

lot lines.

.

LAND STATUS ISSUES ,

The lands that have always been perceived as owned by everyone have finally

been so designated. The conveyance of surface rights to these lands will

have important long term economic consequences for the village of Kaktovik.

The potential now exists for economic’recovery of surface minerals and the

leasing of village land to such industrial interests as oil exploration and

development companies.

The Borough Capital Improvements Program indicates that Kaktovik’s development potential is severely limited by lack of gravel (North Slope Borough,

1977) . The Bureau of Land Management had originally restricted the removal

of any gravel from the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, but this restriction

-169-
-170-
KAKTOVIK LAND STATUS

was effectively removed by the interim conveyance. Within this area are

three known sources of gravel: a borrow pit on the western tip of the

island, the Hulahula River, approximately 15 miles southwest of Kaktovik,

and the Jago River, approximately 10 miles southeast of the community (URSA,

1977).

●

✎
KAKTOVIK UTILITIES

UTILITIES

Utilities in Kaktovik are very limited. Village residents still have to haul

their water and dispose of wastes in honey buckets. Fuel essential for

heating and operating equipment is expensive and often in short supply.

Communications have recently improved through installation of two long

distance telephone linkages between the community and the DEW Line station,

which is tied into communications equipment at Prudhoe Bay/Deadhorse, but

there are no other phones in the community.

Improvements to utilities services in Kaktovik are planned by the Borough,

the State, and the U.S. Public Health Service, but the schedule for completion

in most cases is inconclusive. Because the existing utilities and the planned

improvements are sized only to meet modest local demand, there is no excess

capacity to meet the needs of new industry. For example, the Alaskan Arctic

Gas Pipeline Company, whose proposed pipeline follows an alignment from

Prudhoe Bay to Canada and passes within 25 miles of Kaktovik, plans no use of

community utilities or other services unless desired by Kaktovik residents

(U.S. Dept. of the Interior, 1976). .

.

-172-
KAKTOVIK

WATER AND SEWER SERVICE

UTILITIES

Water and Sewer Service

CURRENT WATER AND SEWER SERVICE

The village water source is at Fresh Water Lagoon located south of the DEW

Line station and west of the village. Water is piped to the DEW Line station,

but is hauled by truck to the village. While the station’s water is treated,

the village’s water is not. The road to the lake parallels the utilidor to

the station. Another poor quality road/trail extends west from the village,

but may be impassable by truck most of the year.

Because of the inconvenience of hauling water over a poorly maintained road

from the water source, water consumption in Kaktovik is among the lowest of

North Slope communities. Only two gallons per day are estimated to be consumed (Johnson and Dryer, in press), significantly below the amount consumed

by the DEW Line employees who have piped and treated water. Another factor

which limits water consumption is the residents belief that the water source

has been and continues to be contaminated by DEW Line vehicles that drive

too close to the lake (Dupere & Associates, 1973).

.

None of the houses in the village is interconnected to a piped water system

from the central storage tank. Six of the 8 houses built fn 1972 were constructed with internal systems which pipe water placed in a residential storage

tank to the bathroom and kitchen. None of the units has a hot water heater.

WATER AND SEWER SERVICE ISSUES

The Borough Capital Improvements Program indicates that the U.S. Public

Health Service could complete the development of a utilities system in

Kaktovik in 1978 (North SIoue Borough, 1977). Phase I of this program would

provide safe water treatment, a community watering point, a central laundry/

showers/toilet facility, and a sewage collection and disposal service. The

Borough’s 1974, Six-Year Capital Improvements Program indicated that these”

facilities would be located at or near the school complex (Alaska International

Academy, 1974).

-173-
KAKTOVIK UTILITIES

Mater and Sewer Service

The State’s plans for construction of a new school and gymnasium at Kaktovik

anticipate purchase of treated water from the DEW Line station. It is

possible that the gymnasium will be connected to the waste water system at

the existing school. The Borough

school’s overall water, sewer and

(North Slope Borough, 1977).

his indicated a need to coordinate the

power needs with those of the community

The long-range Phase II program would provide for construction of a utilidor

from the fresh water lake following an alignment adjacent to a planned 0.8

mile road between the lake and the community. Individual homes and facilities

would be served in the future under Borough and community funding.

It is the Borough’s intent to expedite the construction of water and sewer

facilities in order to provide a necessary infrastructure for development of

educational and community health facilities.

An important issue to the residents of Kaktovik is the disposal of human

wastes stored in the 55 gallon honey buckets. Although the Borough is apparently required to remove all accumulated containers once a year, residents

note that in the past this has not taken place for periods as long as a year

and a half. Infrequent disposal of wastes is not only an inconvenience to

.

village residents, but also imposes conditions conducive to infectious

diseases.

-174-
UTILITIES

Fuel and Electricity

FUEL AND ELECTRICITY

CURRENT FUEL AND ELECTRICITY SERVICE

Fuel in Kaktovik has often been costly and in short supply. Infrequent

delivery of fuel by barge and airplane, and inadequate fuel storage containers

have caused fuel shortages in the past. Until a tank was recently constructed

in the village, rubber bladders borrowed from British Petroleum had to be

used (Dupere & Associates, 1973). This storage tank is located within a

bermed area at the north end of the townsite. The school has its own fuel

storage tanks.

Electricity serves all houses in the village. Until 1974, it was generated

by two privately owned, oil-fired generating plants of’7 kilowatts and 4

kilowatts capacity. Today, electricity is obtained from a single 35 kilowatt

generator owned and operated by Barrow Utilities and Electrical Co-op, . .

Incorporated. Electricity costs 24@ per kilowatt hour; most older houses

are billed for approximately $45 per month, and the eight newer houses are

billed approximately $55 per month. The Borough school has its own electrical generator and distribution system.

.

Consumption of electricity is rising (URSA, 1976). In 1973, a generating

capacity of 11 kilowatts was sufficient to meet the community’s needs, since

electricity was used almost exclusively for lighting. In 1974, 25 percent

of the village housing contained food freezers, used to store foods gained

by subsistence activities. The construction of new housing and improvements

to old housing, combined with increased use of appliances, has created a

demand which the existing system cannot meet (Dupere & Associates, 1974).

FUEL AND ELECTRICITY SERVICE ISSUES

There is a consensus among the villagers of Kaktovik that an inexpensive

source of fuel is the community’s most pressing need (URSA, 1977). Residents

spend more on fuel oil used for heating, and gaso?ine used for transportation

than for any other item. The average annual cost for heating a home is

-175-
KAKTOVIK UTILITIES

Fuel and Electricity

approximately $1,800 to $2,000, and for the electricity it is $540 to $660.

Either a snowmachine or an outboard motor uses approximately 700 gallons

of gasoline per year. In 1976, barged-in gasoline cost $1 per gallon and

airlifted gasoline cost $2 per gallon. The cost of heating oil was expected

to rise from574 per gallon to over $1 per gallon in 1976 (URSA, 1976). The

cost of electricity generated using fuel oil was similarly expected to rise.

The existing electrical generation and distribution system is inadequate to

meet present needs. There is no back-up capacity in case of emergency.

Consequently, the North Slope Borough has designated as a high priority

project the installation of a new electrical generator, electrical distribution system and street lighting. .

This project is estimated to cost $374,000, and would consist of two 90 kilowatt CAT generators and one 55 kilowatt CAT generator, electrical distribution

and street lighting systems (North Slope Borough, 1977). The electrical

distribution system would be intertied to the school’s system. At present,

the Borough is negotiating private easement statements with each homeowner.

Because electrical street lighting is now provided only by individuals, this

project would provide flood lights mounted on residences and community

buildings (North Slope Borough, 1974).

.

Because of its high priority status, the project has been continued, even

though the Borough’s 1977 Capital Improvements Program has been suspended.

However, the North Slope Borough notes that the project is apparently contingent on some State funding. The project is scheduled for completion by the

end of fiscal year 1977/78.

The State plans for construction of a new school will provide additional

electrical generating capacity for the community. Although the State anticipates purchase of power from the DEW Line station, a standby generator of

sufficient capacity to operate both the existing and the new school will

also be provided (North Slope Borough, 1977). The Borough had indicated

its interest in coordinating plans for meeting the power needs of the community with those of the school.

-176-
KAKTOVIK UTILITIES

Communications

COMMUNICATIONS

Telephone communications in Kaktovik rely on the bush communications system

recently installed by RCA Alascom. Phones at the school and in the home of

one individual in the village connect to a switching center at the DEW Line

station, which is tied into the Earth Satellite station at Prudhoe Bay.

The specialized communications and data processing facilities at the DEW

Line station are also provided by RCA. Instant communications with other

stations, Fairbanks, or other communities in the state, are always available.

However, security prohibits villagers from using these facilities except in

case of emergency.

In case of medical emergency, there is also radio contact between the Public

Health Service clinic in Kaktovik and the PHS hospital in Barrow.

Citizens’ Band (CB) radio is used to monitor.aircraft and is increasingly

used for informal communication among residents. Operators of snowmachines

can use CB radio for emergency contact in the event of machinery breakdown

at an isolated location; or subsistence hunters can contact each other in

order to direct the hunt. .

-377-
KAKTOVIK TRANSPORTATION

TRANSPORTATION

Transportation service to and from Kaktovik is limited to twice weekly air

service and annual barge service. Within and around the village, snowmachines

and small outboard motor boats are used extensively. The road system is

being improved in the town site and improvements are planned for linkages

to the community dump and the water source.

-178-
KAKTOVIK

)

TRANSPORTATION

Air Transportation

AIR TRANSPORTATION

CLJRRENT AIR TRANSPORTATI ON

The community’s only airport is operated by the Air Force at the DEW Line

station. The airstrip is restricted to certain aircraft approved by the

Department of Air Force, forty-eight hours prior to landing.

Wien Air Alaska has a contract with the DEW Line station to provide regular

air service to Barter Island. Flights are scheduled by 19-seat, Twin Otter

aircraft, twice a week from Deadhorse. Seats are made available to civilians

not employed by the DEW Line station on a space available basis. The local

Wien agent estimated that in 1975 there were a total of 60-75 personal trips

made outside the village. The most common trip was to Fairbanks, cost $130

round trip, and lasted 3 to 5 days (URSA, April 1976).

The Arctic Slope Regional Corporation also has an agreement with the Air

Force which provides weekly charter service. A local pilot owns a Cessna 180

that lands on the road at the DEW Line site. The plane is also available

for medical or other emergencies (URSA, 1974). The Public Health Service

will also fly patients to the Barrow hospital when notified by radio.

.

Air transportation facilities include the 4,817 foot gravel runway and an

air terminal building. Unlike the runway at the Barrow airport, which is

equipped with approach radar and runway lighting, the DEW Line airstrip has

only surveillance radar and no lighting. The airstrip cannot handle 737

jets, but the State and the DEW Line station are improving the strip to serve

larger aircraft. Located near the airstrip is a Borough-owned warm storage

building, where rental tractors, back hoes and augers are available for local

Borough-funded and other projects.

-179-
KAKTOVIK TRANSPORTATION

Marine Transportation

MARINE TRANSPORTATION

Marine transport to Kaktovik is limited to barges serving the DEW Line station.

Because of shallow water near shore, lighteri~g of cargo to the unloading

area near the landingstrip is necessary.

The village of Kaktovik is normally not served by the DEW Line barges. However, because the BIA cargo ship Northstar III does not come as far east as

Kaktovik, essential supplies, such as fuel oil purchased by the village corporation, have been brought in by DEW Line barge in 1972 and 1973. Some goods

brought to Barrow via the Northstar are airshipped to Kaktovik. Because of

unreliable barge service, the community is increasingly dependent upon air

transportation. This dependency is reflected in the extremely high cost of

goods brought to the village.

.

.

-180-

1
KAKTOVIK

b

ROAD TRANSPORTATION

TRANSPORTATION

Road Transportation

CURRENT ROAD TRANSPORTATION

Kaktovik has a rudimentary gravel road system which connects the DEW Line

site to the airport, and a gravel and composition side road which connects

to the town site. The main road through the village, Barter Avenue, was

improved in 1975. This 1,800-foot long, 12-foot wide road was constructed

by the Borough at a cost of $120,000. In 1976, six side streets (Second

Street through Seventh Street) totalling 1,670 feet in length were constructed.

These 14-foot wide roads were installed for a total cost of $144,000, an

expenditure for which the Borough expects to be reimbursed by the State Local

Service Roads and Trails Program (North Slope Borough, 1977).

Vehicular use in Kaktovik consists of about five trucks, twenty to twentyfive snowmobiles, and various motorcycles and three-wheeled motorcycles

(“Tote-Goats” ). The average snowmachine costs over $2,000, requires approximately $200 per year for maintenance and last about two years (URSA, 1976).

Gasoline to power snowmobiles and outboard motor boats costs $1 per gallon

if shipped by barge, or $2 per gallon if flown in by airplane.” Since each

snowmachine uses about 700 gallons of gasoline per year, transportation is

extremely expensive. .

ROAD TRANSPORTATION ISSUES

The Borough’s 1977 Capital Improvements Program discusses three long-range

programs for development of the village’s road system. The first is meant to

continue improvements to the community’s existing roads, and the others are

meant to provide new roads to the community dump and the fresh water source.

The community road improvement program will widen Barter Avenue from 14 to 18

feet and add an additional 1,600 feet of new roads. It is anticipated that

the Borough would continue to fund these improvements under the expectation

that reimbursement would come from the State’s Local Service Roads and

Trails Program.

-181-
0 L !’4 PLATTED TOVVN5H1P 5 WE \. ‘“\ /

——.

1P

\,

\. . / ” “\ “\

5aJRas:t4cxrH=mPE

w -. . .

IG4KTOV IK CQMMLNWY 5TUDY s ROAD

TRAIWPOHATION -182-
KAKTOVIK TRANSPORTATION

Road Transportation

The new road to the water source will require construction of 0.4 miles

of new road and upgrading of 0.4 miles of old road. The road will be 18

feet wide on a five foot deep gravel base, and the road will bypass the

existing road to the lake from the DEW Line station. Total cost, at $13

per cubic yard for gravel, is estimated at $250,000.

The new one-half mule long road to the community dump is identified as a low

priority project. Planned to be 11 feet wide and 5 feet deep, its total

construction cost is estimated at $210,000. It is not known whether the

alignment of this road will follow the existing alignment from the DEW Line

station, or will bypass the station to the east.

.

.

-183-
KAKTOVIK BIBLIOGRAPHY

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Alas ka. Dept. of Highways. City of Kaktovik map. 1973.

Alaska International Academy. North Slope Borough, capital improvements

program, fiscal year 1974/75-1979/80. Spring 1974: 209 p.

Johnson and Dryer. Village water use in arctic Alaska. In press.

North Slope Borough. Draft 1977 capital improvements program -- Kaktovik

village project schedule. March 1977: 11 p.

Robert R. Nathan Associates, Inc. Implementing the Alaska Native Claims

Settlement Act. Prepared for the Alaska Native Foundation. 1974.

Urban and Rural Systems Associates. An analysis of the socio-economic

impact in Alaska of the Alaskan Arctic Gas Pipeline Company pipeline.

January 1974: 360 p.

----- Current socioeconomic data on Kaktovik; memorandum by David Boorkman,

April 22, 1976: 4p.

----- Interview with Ernest Fazio, visitor to Kaktovik, 1977.

U.S. Dept. of the Interior. Draft environmental impact statement - Alaska

natural gas transportation system, part 11, Alaska, vol. 1 of 3.

June 1975: 778p.

-184-

——.-. . . -— .. —___ —. ——..—. — .—. ..-—. — .. ___ . .. ___ ~__ ..__ ._ . .._ . . ____ _, ___ ------- _. .,.- . . . . ___ . . . .—.