# Appendix E Temporally Allocating Emission with CEM Data for Chemical Transport and SIP Modeling

## 		
		

		

	
 	
							  !"#$%&$'	
()*+$+


, '
		
		-	.'- /%%0$	%0$	('&$$1*

2		34-			 		
.-/4
 	3	- 	34
 		5	(6.5(6/	 	4	4
 			3 	
4		 3		7		 		

 !"!

-					
.-/ 				 		
			 		4		 	
			 		

-3
	
	
	 	
	2	
8	 4
7	


 		"
	 		
	 		
	 	
-	3	 3		
34- 	
	5(6			 		9


2		34%$$1
%$$#-	 4
	8		 5(6		4
 %$$% "		5(6			 4			34 4				 8 			 (:	44 3
4 4	83 	8			3-%5 "		4	 3	8		 -		7		 		

!#

		
	 1 

### 					 		
3		 3-;	 		-4		 						 4	 		 	4	3 	3		(4 		 3	
2	7	4	 3	33	

### 
	
	3 			 		3 		
	

'- 4	< (2 '44	3 ( 5(68		  	 94
	38 34
			-3	5(6 			2	8	 		
 		-	
		6 1344	%$$% 3	3 38	%$$% 		3 3	334

$%&' 
	%$$%	 	-	

2	7-	- 
			.= /	
 %$$1
%$$#.3
	
%$$%3/4 2	 	9 	
	
		2 3							- %%	 5 "			

2	 
43	
	 	

		> 3		2		 	
	
4	3 		 	3 "		 43			.4
/

2		34 						4 46	4 			
			 2	4	4  "	 %$$1
%$$#			 
4 33434" 
	
4 	4	44	

	

		

	

		

	

	

	           

  

 

  

  



### "4	4 4	"	, 4
	%$$1
%$$#
	 	"				 ,4
	2 ,4
	 
	 		
3	
	
 		
	
 		 		( 4		 	4		3	 
		?

	3 	?	

2			3 	
4 	43		%$$% 3		  


2			
3- 4								2 
	4	5(6	5(6 					3 		
	83 3	:		 -3	5(6			 	488	
	 		
4	-3 4			
5(6			@ 		-83	 	
5(6						( 	-3		
 
5(6				 	
3 4


4 	?	
2


 		4	
3	4	 5(6						

5(6			4 	?	
 	
	"	.1% "#"%)/4				 3		A 	
			4 		
4"		 	
A			8 5(6				 		 
		 	3		
		 3		 			4 	3	

 			
3		 	B	?	


25(6		
	4 	
	5(6	 	
		
	 	
		B 		
			 	

	

6( 	3		
		 .A=/	3>8 		2			  3		 3 34	?	
 	 	 		  	 	8	 	3	
 	8					?	
 	

()!$! ($$

4
4	-83 % 

### 4	4 



	 -	4 4	-%5 "(			 34"	3		3	

### 2	"	3 	83	8		 	
			 	4	
-%5 " 		2 	4	 4	3		4	 35(6	 3

%$$%-5 "%		4 3		
3	3 		 	3	6	
% #344 	


	

$%*' 2		3	%$$%-5 " 	3-	-5 "

2	3	- 5 "	5 "
34 2				

	
35 "		 	
3
 		5 ":	 		-(;8 5 "	
3
"		 8		
 			 	3

			 A=
8 	8	 		4 	 2"		 			3 				 	?	
	
4		 	4	
	!!!"#$             

%&'()*'#+(,

### $%+' 2		3	%$$%-% 	3-	-%

6%		
 	% 			
2 		34	%	
	 			 34	5 "

 47	8 		
	 		
		

		44 3	
	 %$$%-		43 3	4 4		
34	3	3 4	
7	134

7	.1/ 

#   	


#    

#    

#    

#     

# %

4 

## 
  

### 	83		   

##   

### 			83		   

## 

 

### 	%$$%-8			  5				

 	
 	
			6%"	 %*C%$$%		43 34		
34			 3	65 "	0$C!!!"#$             

%&'()*'#+(,

### 6"		
	3 483				 	3	4		
	 			4 		4	4	3 					
				 343	 6		
		 		 		

"(

2	
3444A=5 "		 
,4
4 	
-83	8			 5	 3		
 
4'- 		 A=	3 
-	
	3 A=		
%)"D	

$%,' ;	,1%%$$%A=5 "4	4	-83	

6	
0
*34		 		,4
 	
	 2	
E6 		
 	A=25 E- 	'- 		  	332:(2<E-	 	8			3 -

### $%-' ,1%%$$%5 "A
	A=

$%.' ,1%%$$%5 "(		A=

### $%/' ,1%%$$%5 "		
A=

$%0' ,1%%$$%5 "	A=

### 6	
+
1%3444
	5 F%$$% %$$+						4	4	-3	

$%1' 	3 	34	 1$24
%$24
 	
	%$$%

$%&2' 	
		4
>4
	3		 44	-

### 6	
11:		83  3	
 
3	


		

6	
1%-83	

### ! ("!  ! ! 

 	-						
		3	
4	 	
	
 	-
 		8			 
	4	5(6		 			
4	1#D		5(68 		
4 4
38G1$$$ 	
			
	8 				
4	 3	
- 	?	
	./-885(6 
	
	 		
 	
		 
 6		
 		4	(3	 

A		7	 	 	
	? 	3- 37			 34-83		 	
"	 4		-3 	

<		3	3	

 	
		
3 	?	-		83 %5 "	 	
		

2	83			?  "	 		3 			
 2"			7 
	8? 	: 			 :	 		 7		
 	344		
		
 ?	

		

23					 	
834- 5(6(		 	 	
43			 		
87		
8	- 4					2
		3 	3		 93	8	 		43- 5(683 		 	
	 	

	343 	-				5(6			 	. 		9			 3-3 	/(	
8	 5(64
	
  		 4						
 					4 		34-5(6

(			 		 3	
	
	
8	 -4					 47		
4		 	
4	 43		?	-3	 

### $ 

1 ,H-	=I ; 5	:

	
'	 53%$$#% AH<(	= 	?	
-8!I1)  

### 		(- =		
'J
5J 	%$$0

### 3)4! -					 A= 		 	 2

# Appendix F 2008 Base Year Emissions Inventory Area (nonpoint) Sources by County and SCCC

o

u

n t y p

o l l

u t

a

n t 2

1 0 4 0 0 8 1 0 0 2

1 0 4 0 0 8 2 1 0 2

1 0 4 0 0 8 2 2 0 2

1 0 4 0 0 8 2 3 0 2

1 0 4 0 0 8 3 1 0 2

1 0 4 0 0 8 3 2 0 2

1 0 4 0 0 8 3 3 0 2

1 0 4 0 0 8 4 0 0 2

1 0 4 0 0 8 5 1 0 2

1 0 4 0 0 8 6 1 0 2

1 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 0

Ashtabula NOx 0.00029 0.00036 9.4E-05 2.8E-05 0.00038 9.8E-05 2.9E-05 0.00015 0.00387 0.00288 0.0159

VOC 0.0021 0.00684 0.0005 0.00021 0.00711 0.00052 0.00021 1.6E-06 0.02478 0.01844 0.00027 Cuyahoga NOx 0.00444 0.00495 0.00129 0.00038 0.00438 0.00114 0.00033 0.00164 0 0 0.16678

VOC 0.03227 0.09362 0.0068 0.00283 0.083 0.00603 0.00251 1.8E-05 0 0 0.00284 Geauga NOx 0.00027 0.0003 7.7E-05 2.3E-05 0.00026 6.8E-05 2E-05 9.8E-05 0 0 0.02161

VOC 0.00193 0.00559 0.00041 0.00017 0.00497 0.00036 0.00015 1.1E-06 0 0 0.00037 Lake NOx 0.00074 0.00082 0.00021 6.2E-05 0.00073 0.00019 5.5E-05 0.00027 0 0 0.03385

VOC 0.00534 0.0155 0.00112 0.00047 0.01375 0.001 0.00042 2.9E-06 0 0 0.00058 Lorain NOx 0.00091 0.00101 0.00026 7.7E-05 0.0009 0.00023 6.8E-05 0.00034 0 0 0.03724

VOC 0.0066 0.01914 0.00139 0.00058 0.01697 0.00123 0.00051 3.6E-06 0 0 0.00063 Medina NOx 0.0005 0.00056 0.00014 4.2E-05 0.00049 0.00013 3.8E-05 0.00018 0 0 0.01994

VOC 0.00362 0.01051 0.00076 0.00032 0.00932 0.00068 0.00028 2E-06 0 0 0.00034 Portage NOx 0.00043 0.00054 0.00014 4.2E-05 0.00056 0.00015 4.3E-05 0.00022 0 0 0.02442

VOC 0.00314 0.01025 0.00075 0.00031 0.01066 0.00078 0.00032 2.4E-06 0 0 0.00042 Summit NOx 0.00161 0.00202 0.00053 0.00015 0.0021 0.00055 0.00016 0.00083 0 0 0.07233

VOC 0.01174 0.03826 0.00278 0.00116 0.03982 0.00289 0.0012 9E-06 0 0 0.00123 Delaware NOx 0.00053 0.00044 0.00011 3.3E-05 0.0006 0.00016 4.6E-05 0.00021 0 0 0.01239

VOC 0.00387 0.00827 0.0006 0.00025 0.01135 0.00082 0.00034 2.3E-06 0 0 0.00021 Fairfield NOx 0.0005 0.00041 0.00011 3.1E-05 0.00056 0.00015 4.3E-05 0.00019 0 0 0.00934

VOC 0.00363 0.00775 0.00056 0.00023 0.01063 0.00077 0.00032 2.1E-06 0 0 0.00016 Franklin NOx 0.00461 0.00378 0.00099 0.00029 0.00519 0.00136 0.0004 0.00177 0 0 0.06914

VOC 0.03351 0.07164 0.0052 0.00217 0.09828 0.00713 0.00297 1.9E-05 0 0 0.00118 Knox NOx 0.00016 0.0002 5.1E-05 1.5E-05 0.00021 5.4E-05 1.6E-05 8.1E-05 0.00211 0.00157 0.00993

VOC 0.00114 0.00374 0.00027 0.00011 0.00389 0.00028 0.00012 8.7E-07 0.01353 0.01006 0.00017 Licking NOx 0.00058 0.00048 0.00013 3.7E-05 0.00066 0.00017 5.1E-05 0.00023 0 0 0.01682

VOC 0.00425 0.00909 0.00066 0.00028 0.01247 0.00091 0.00038 2.4E-06 0 0 0.00029 Madison NOx 0.00014 0.00011 3E-05 8.7E-06 0.00016 4.1E-05 1.2E-05 5.3E-05 0 0 0.00586

VOC 0.001 0.00214 0.00016 6.5E-05 0.00294 0.00021 8.8E-05 5.8E-07 0 0 1E-04 Butler NOx 0.00095 0.00109 0.00028 8.3E-05 0.00129 0.00034 9.8E-05 0.00045 0 0 0.03888

VOC 0.00688 0.02055 0.00149 0.00062 0.02434 0.00177 0.00073 4.8E-06 0 0 0.00066 Clermont NOx 0.00052 0.00059 0.00016 4.5E-05 0.0007 0.00018 5.4E-05 0.00024 0 0 0

VOC 0.00377 0.01125 0.00082 0.00034 0.01332 0.00097 0.0004 2.6E-06 0 0 0 Clinton NOx 0.00012 0.00015 4E-05 1.2E-05 0.00016 4.2E-05 1.2E-05 6.1E-05 0.00164 0.00122 0.00875

VOC 0.00089 0.00289 0.00021 9E-05 0.00302 0.00022 9.3E-05 6.6E-07 0.01051 0.00781 0.00015 Hamilton NOx 0.00248 0.00284 0.00074 0.00022 0.00336 0.00088 0.00026 0.00117 0 0 0.09854

VOC 0.01799 0.05375 0.0039 0.00162 0.06368 0.00462 0.00193 1.3E-05 0 0 0.00168 

### Warren NOx 0.00051 0.00058 0.00015 4.5E-05 0.00069 0.00018 5.3E-05 0.00024 0 0 0.02434

VOC 0.00369 0.01103 0.0008 0.00033 0.01308 0.00095 0.00039 2.6E-06 0 0 0.00041 

### Area SCC list and descriptions: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2011nei/2011_neiv1_tsd_draft.pdf Area SCCs

Emissions (tons per day)



### Appendix F - Page 1C

o

u

n t y p

o l l

u t

a

n t 2

1 0 2 0 0 5 0 0 0 2

1 0 2 0 0 7 0 0 0 2

1 0 2 0 0 8 0 0 0 2

1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 2

1 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 0 2

1 0 3 0 0 6 0 0 0 2

1 0 3 0 0 7 0 0 0 2

1 0 3 0 0 8 0 0 0 2

1 0 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 2

1 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 2

1 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0

Ashtabula NOx 0.01479 0.00188 0.04394 0.0062 0.00687 0.06207 0.00211 0.00407 0.00439 0.0001 0.00315

VOC 0.0003 0.0001 0.0034 0.00011 0.00012 0.00341 0.00012 0.00031 7.5E-05 0.00011 0.00012 Cuyahoga NOx 0.13662 0.01987 0.46548 0.06571 0.20634 1.843 0.06357 0.1225 0.13211 0.00017 0.00138

VOC 0.00281 0.00109 0.03597 0.00112 0.00351 0.10137 0.00348 0.00947 0.00226 0.00019 5.4E-05 Geauga NOx 0.0201 0.00255 0.05972 0.00843 0.00658 0.05947 0.00203 0.0039 0.00421 0.00071 0.00468

VOC 0.00041 0.00014 0.00461 0.00014 0.00011 0.00327 0.00011 0.0003 7.2E-05 0.00078 0.00018 Lake NOx 0.03869 0.00491 0.11496 0.01623 0.02294 0.20673 0.00706 0.01361 0.01468 1.6E-05 0.00183

VOC 0.00079 0.00027 0.00888 0.00028 0.00039 0.01137 0.00039 0.00105 0.00025 1.7E-05 7.1E-05 Lorain NOx 0.03464 0.00439 0.10294 0.01453 0.02405 0.21738 0.0074 0.01426 0.01538 1E-05 0.0012

VOC 0.00071 0.00024 0.00795 0.00025 0.00041 0.01196 0.00041 0.0011 0.00026 1.1E-05 4.7E-05 Medina NOx 0.01854 0.00235 0.05511 0.00778 0.0146 0.12856 0.0045 0.00868 0.00936 3.6E-05 0.00199

VOC 0.00038 0.00013 0.00426 0.00013 0.00025 0.00707 0.00025 0.00067 0.00016 4E-05 7.8E-05 Portage NOx 0.02271 0.00288 0.06749 0.00953 0.0112 0.07435 0.00345 0.00664 0.00716 0.00015 0.00417

VOC 0.00047 0.00016 0.00522 0.00016 0.00019 0.00409 0.00019 0.00051 0.00012 0.00016 0.00016 Summit NOx 0.06728 0.00853 0.19993 0.02822 0.07012 0.61577 0.02159 0.0416 0.04486 4.5E-05 0.00212

VOC 0.00138 0.00047 0.01545 0.00048 0.00119 0.03387 0.00118 0.00321 0.00077 5E-05 8.2E-05 Delaware NOx 0.01152 0.00146 0.03424 0.00483 0.01819 0.16388 0.0056 0.01079 0.01163 3.1E-05 0.00165

VOC 0.00024 8E-05 0.00265 8.3E-05 0.00031 0.00901 0.00031 0.00083 0.0002 3.4E-05 6.4E-05 Fairfield NOx 0.00868 0.0011 0.02581 0.00364 0.0091 0.08228 0.0028 0.0054 0.00582 3.8E-05 0.00165

VOC 0.00018 6E-05 0.00199 6.2E-05 0.00015 0.00453 0.00015 0.00042 1E-04 4.2E-05 6.4E-05 Franklin NOx 0 0.00842 0.19737 0.02786 0.17597 1.3826 0.05524 0.10645 0.1148 6.8E-05 0.0027

VOC 0 0.00046 0.01525 0.00048 0.00299 0.07604 0.00303 0.00823 0.00196 7.4E-05 0.0001 Knox NOx 0.00924 0.00117 0.02745 0.00388 0.00458 0.04144 0.00141 0.00272 0.00293 0 0.0008

VOC 0.00019 6.4E-05 0.00212 6.6E-05 7.8E-05 0.00228 7.7E-05 0.00021 5E-05 0 3.1E-05 Licking NOx 0.01565 0.00198 0.0465 0.00656 0.01342 0.07281 0.00413 0.00796 0.00859 3.3E-05 0.00189

VOC 0.00032 0.00011 0.00359 0.00011 0.00023 0.004 0.00023 0.00062 0.00015 3.6E-05 7.4E-05 Madison NOx 0.00545 0.00069 0.01619 0.00229 0.00287 0.02596 0.00088 0.0017 0.00184 0 0.00085

VOC 0.00011 3.8E-05 0.00125 3.9E-05 4.9E-05 0.00143 4.8E-05 0.00013 3.1E-05 0 3.3E-05 Butler NOx 0.03715 0.00469 0.11041 0.01559 0.03524 0 0.01085 0.02091 0.02255 4.9E-05 0.00678

VOC 0.00076 0.00026 0.00853 0.00027 0.0006 0 0.00059 0.00162 0.00039 5.3E-05 0.00026 Clermont NOx 0.0121 0.00153 0.03595 0.00508 0.01507 0.13625 0.00464 0.00894 0.00964 2.6E-05 0.00625

VOC 0.00025 8.4E-05 0.00278 8.7E-05 0.00026 0.00749 0.00025 0.00069 0.00016 2.9E-05 0.00024 Clinton NOx 0.00814 0.00103 0.02419 0.00342 0.00699 0.06322 0.00215 0.00415 0.00447 1E-05 0.00129

VOC 0.00017 5.7E-05 0.00187 5.8E-05 0.00012 0.00348 0.00012 0.00032 7.7E-05 1.1E-05 5E-05 Hamilton NOx 0.04975 0.01353 0.31698 0.04475 0.13642 1.15921 0.04213 0.08119 0.08756 8.3E-05 0.00589



### VOC 0.00102 0.00074 0.02449 0.00077 0.00232 0.06376 0.00231 0.00627 0.0015 9.2E-05 0.00023 Warren 

### NOx 0.02333 0.00295 0.06932 0.00979 0.0187 0.1248 0.00576 0.0111 0.01197 0 0.00393



### VOC 0.00048 0.00016 0.00536 0.00017 0.00032 0.00686 0.00032 0.00086 0.0002 0 0.00015 

### Area SCCs

Area SCC list and descriptions: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2011nei/2011_neiv1_tsd_draft.pdf Emissions (tons per day)



### Appendix F - Page 2C

o

u

n t y p

o l l

u t

a

n t 2

1 0 4 0 0 6 0 0 0 2

1 0 4 0 0 7 0 0 0 2

1 0 4 0 0 9 0 0 0 2

1 0 4 0 1 1 0 0 0 2

3 0 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 2

3 0 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 2

3 0 2 0 0 3 1 0 0 2

6 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2

6 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 2

6 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 2

6 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0

Ashtabula NOx 0.01717 0.03527 0.00288 0.00847 0 0 0 0.00294 0.00237 0.0386 0.06551

VOC 0.001 0.00137 0.01482 0.00033 0.00166 0.00572 0.00082 0.01326 0.009 0.08956 0.09345 Cuyahoga NOx 0.33962 0.07789 0.0452 0.00372 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.01987 0.00303 0.23272 0.00014 0.0212 0.07294 0.01045 0 0 0 0 Geauga NOx 0.01056 0.02039 0.00271 0.01259 0 0 0 0.00386 0.00311 0.08294 0.08602

VOC 0.00062 0.00079 0.01393 0.00049 0.00156 0.00538 0.00077 0.01741 0.01182 0.19241 0.12272 Lake NOx 0.0513 0.01136 0.00748 0.00493 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.003 0.00044 0.0385 0.00019 0.00386 0.0133 0.00191 0 0 0 0 Lorain NOx 0.05531 0.05709 0.00923 0.00322 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00324 0.00222 0.04752 0.00013 0.00503 0.01729 0.00248 0 0 0 0 Medina NOx 0.02676 0.04234 0.00507 0.00537 0 0 0 0.00373 0.00301 0.12038 0.08321

VOC 0.00157 0.00165 0.02612 0.00021 0.00283 0.00973 0.00139 0.01685 0.01143 0.27928 0.11871 Portage NOx 0.02467 0.05396 0.00432 0.01122 0 0 0 0.00411 0.00332 0.08802 0.09176

VOC 0.00144 0.0021 0.02222 0.00044 0.00258 0.00886 0.00127 0.01858 0.01261 0.2042 0.13091 Summit NOx 0.13128 0.02582 0.01609 0.0057 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00768 0.00101 0.08284 0.00022 0.00896 0.03082 0.00442 0 0 0 0 Delaware NOx 0.01708 0.04714 0.00553 0.00445 0 0 0 0.00169 0.00137 0.07544 0.07557

VOC 0.001 0.00184 0.02849 0.00017 0.00272 0.00938 0.00134 0.00765 0.00519 0.17503 0.10781 Fairfield NOx 0.01853 0.05605 0.00504 0.00443 0 0 0 0.00355 0.00286 0.03651 0.07921

VOC 0.00108 0.00218 0.02597 0.00017 0.00235 0.00808 0.00116 0.01604 0.01088 0.0847 0.113 Franklin NOx 0.23408 0.07647 0.0462 0.00726 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.0137 0.00298 0.23788 0.00028 0.01864 0.06415 0.00919 0 0 0 0 Knox NOx 0.00724 0.04726 0.00154 0.00215 0 0 0 0.00223 0.0018 0.01306 0.04968

VOC 0.00042 0.00184 0.00794 8.3E-05 0.00098 0.00337 0.00048 0.01006 0.00682 0.0303 0.07088 Licking NOx 0.02433 0.07104 0.00592 0.00509 0 0 0 0.00389 0.00314 0.06495 0.08675

VOC 0.00142 0.00277 0.03049 0.0002 0.0026 0.00896 0.00128 0.01756 0.01192 0.15069 0.12376 Madison NOx 0.00469 0.02843 0.00139 0.0023 0 0 0 0.00065 0.00052 0.0082 0.02884

VOC 0.00027 0.00111 0.00717 8.9E-05 0.00069 0.00238 0.00034 0.00292 0.00198 0.01903 0.04114 Butler NOx 0.04677 0.06173 0.01162 0.01824 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00274 0.0024 0.05984 0.00071 0.00596 0.0205 0.00294 0 0 0 0 Clermont NOx 0.0152 0.07669 0.00633 0.01682 0 0 0 0.00357 0.00288 0.10113 0.07974

VOC 0.00089 0.00299 0.0326 0.00065 0.00323 0.0111 0.00159 0.01614 0.01095 0.23461 0.11376 Clinton NOx 0.00358 0.03707 0.00117 0.00346 0 0 0 0.00152 0.00122 0.00799 0.03387

VOC 0.00021 0.00144 0.00602 0.00013 0.00071 0.00245 0.00035 0.00686 0.00465 0.01853 0.04832 Hamilton NOx 0.16818 0.07177 0.03035 0.01583 0 0 0 0 0 0 0



### VOC 0.00984 0.00279 0.15624 0.00062 0.01406 0.04838 0.00693 0 0 0 0 Warren 

### NOx 0.01857 0.04901 0.00623 0.01057 0 0 0 0.003 0.00242 0.10826 0.067



### VOC 0.00109 0.00191 0.0321 0.00041 0.00342 0.01178 0.00169 0.01356 0.0092 0.25116 0.09559 

### Area SCCs

Area SCC list and descriptions: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2011nei/2011_neiv1_tsd_draft.pdf Emissions (tons per day)



### Appendix F - Page 3C

o

u

n t y p

o l l

u t

a

n t 2

8 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2

8 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 2

1 0 2 0 0 6 0 0 0 2

6 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2

8 1 0 0 6 0 2 0 0 2

2 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

2 9 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

3 0 2 0 0 3 2 0 0 2

3 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2

3 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 2

3 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0

Ashtabula NOx 0.00047 0 0 0 0.0004 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00373 0 0 0.00342 0 0 0 3.2E-05 0 0 0 Cuyahoga NOx 0.00507 0 1.41793 0 0.00609 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.03987 0 0.07799 0.11073 0 0 0 0.00041 0 0 0 Geauga NOx 0.00043 0 0.32891 0 0.00032 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00336 0 0.01809 0.00154 0 0 0 3E-05 0 0 0 Lake NOx 0.0007 0 0.62168 0 0.00081 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00547 0 0.03419 0.01002 0 0 0 7.4E-05 0 0 0 Lorain NOx 0.00086 0 0.33394 0 0.00082 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00679 0 0.01837 0.01448 0 0 0 9.7E-05 0 0 0 Medina NOx 0.00037 0 0.33836 0 0.00038 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00288 0 0.01861 0.00578 0 0 0 5.4E-05 0 0 0 Portage NOx 0.00052 0 0.33945 0 0.00045 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00412 0 0.01867 0.00462 0 0 0 4.9E-05 0 0 0 Summit NOx 0.00178 0 1.2253 0 0.00231 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.01402 0 0.06739 0.03379 0 0 0 0.00017 0 0 0 Delaware NOx 0.00035 0 0.12652 0 0.00024 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00272 0 0.00696 0.00466 0 0 0 5.2E-05 0 0 0 Fairfield NOx 0.00051 0 0.14811 0 0.00033 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00402 0 0.00815 0.00555 0 0 0 4.5E-05 0 0 0 Franklin NOx 0.0033 0 1.24672 0 0.00424 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.02594 0 0.06857 0.06627 0 0 0 0.00036 0 0 0 Knox NOx 0.00023 0 0 0 0.0002 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00184 0 0 0.00175 0 0 0 1.9E-05 0 0 0 Licking NOx 0.00068 0 0.15983 0 0.00045 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00537 0 0.00879 0.00683 0 0 0 5E-05 0 0 0 Madison NOx 0.00014 0 0.09919 0 7.8E-05 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00113 0 0.00546 0.00168 0 0 0 1.3E-05 0 0 0 Butler NOx 0.0012 0 0.54383 0 0.00064 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00943 0 0.02991 0.02226 0 0 0 0.00011 0 0 0 Clermont NOx 0.00064 0 0.21877 0 0.00025 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00499 0 0.01203 0.0055 0 0 0 6.2E-05 0 0 0 Clinton NOx 0.00017 0 0.13997 0 7.9E-05 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00135 0 0.0077 0.00119 0 0 0 1.4E-05 0 0 0 Hamilton NOx 0.0032 0 1.84575 0 0.00281 0 0 0 0 0 0



### VOC 0.02511 0 0.10152 0.06132 0 0 0 0.00027 0 0 0 Warren 

### NOx 0.00053 0 0.29401 0 0.00029 0 0 0 0 0 0



### VOC 0.00414 0 0.01617 0.00838 0 0 0 6.6E-05 0 0 0 

### Area SCCs

Area SCC list and descriptions: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2011nei/2011_neiv1_tsd_draft.pdf Emissions (tons per day)



### Appendix F - Page 4C

o

u

n t y p

o l l

u t

a

n t 2

3 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 2

4 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2

4 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 2

4 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 2

4 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 2

4 0 1 0 2 5 0 0 0 2

4 0 1 0 5 5 0 0 0 2

4 0 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 2

4 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2

4 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2

4 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ashtabula NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00174 0.38832 0.04754 0.05092 0.00468 0.00423 0.00257 0.01739 0.13325 0.00097 0.06904 Cuyahoga NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.02217 4.95367 0.81903 0.14518 0.14284 0.44137 0.40006 0.10743 1.6998 0.01239 3.18833 Geauga NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00164 0.36558 0.04912 0.03259 1.21 0.02646 0.0657 0 0.12544 0.00091 0.28694 Lake NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00404 0.90294 0.24318 0.03725 0.08062 0.0815 0.12413 0 0.30983 0.00226 0.6944 Lorain NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00526 1.17434 0.17273 0.05678 0.03011 0.03069 0.07379 0 0.40296 0.00294 0.80994 Medina NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00296 0.66057 0.12226 0.04228 0.08564 0.00423 0.02222 0.00273 0.22667 0.00165 0.38898 Portage NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00269 0.60185 0.11117 0.04933 0.00669 0.00423 0.10136 0 0.20652 0.00151 0.36242 Summit NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00937 2.09332 0.39921 0.09284 0.07126 0.56732 0.23411 0 0.7183 0.00524 1.39412 Delaware NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00285 0.63671 0.03885 0.04321 0.04951 0 0.0183 0 0.21848 0.00159 0.18926 Fairfield NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00246 0.54873 0.0707 0.04314 0.02509 0 0.02735 0 0.18829 0.00137 0.12708 Franklin NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.0195 4.35619 0.95592 0.14123 0.21678 0.2265 0.33122 0.01739 1.49477 0.0109 1.90649 Knox NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00102 0.22889 0.02523 0.04047 0.02442 0 0.00968 0.01739 0.07854 0.00057 0.1921 Licking NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00272 0.60852 0.07765 0.05647 0.00301 0 0.00841 0 0.20881 0.00152 0.25738 Madison NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00072 0.16151 0.02024 0.02234 0.0281 0.0254 0.00132 0 0.05542 0.0004 0.09421 Butler NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00623 1.39191 0.16261 0.06063 0.11408 0.00953 0.11263 0 0.47762 0.00348 0.75909 Clermont NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00337 0.75384 0.13518 0.04366 0.02509 0.00423 0.21553 0 0.25867 0.00189 0.29439 Clinton NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00075 0.16668 0.0171 0.02566 0.00301 0 0.0025 0 0.05719 0.00042 0.22961 Hamilton NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0



### VOC 0.0147 3.28525 0.63313 0.09793 0.25859 0.34928 0.23219 0.10845 1.1273 0.00822 2.01894 Warren 

### NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0



### VOC 0.00358 0.80001 0.06253 0.04174 0.05252 0.0254 0.01239 0 0.27452 0.002 0.35523 

### Area SCCs

Emissions (tons per day)



### Area SCC list and descriptions: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2011nei/2011_neiv1_tsd_draft.pdf Appendix F - Page 5C

o

u

n t y p

o l l

u t

a

n t 2

4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

4 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2

4 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2

4 6 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2

4 6 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 2

4 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 2

4 6 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 2

4 6 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 2

4 6 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 2

4 6 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 2

4 6 1 8 5 0 0 0 0

Ashtabula NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00032 0.24332 0.23051 0.17417 0.12166 0.073 0.22795 0.00896 0.02254 0.0167 0.16188 Cuyahoga NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.0255 3.10393 2.94056 2.22176 1.55197 0.93118 2.9079 0.11436 0.23377 0.1732 0 Geauga NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00059 0.22907 0.21701 0.16396 0.11453 0.06872 0.2146 0.00844 0.01824 0.01351 0.01892 Lake NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00236 0.56578 0.536 0.40498 0.28289 0.16973 0.53004 0.02084 0.03736 0.02768 0 Lorain NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00347 0.73583 0.6971 0.5267 0.36792 0.22075 0.68936 0.02711 0.05125 0.03797 0.26328 Medina NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00115 0.41391 0.39212 0.29627 0.20695 0.12417 0.38776 0.01525 0.03301 0.02446 0.14795 Portage NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00236 0.37711 0.35727 0.26993 0.18856 0.11313 0.3533 0.01389 0.03654 0.02707 0.101 Summit NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00624 1.31166 1.24263 0.93887 0.65583 0.3935 1.22882 0.04832 0.10471 0.07758 0 Delaware NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00106 0.39896 0.37796 0.28557 0.19948 0.11969 0.37376 0.0147 0.02234 0.01655 0.35993 Fairfield NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00126 0.34383 0.32573 0.24611 0.17191 0.10315 0.32211 0.01267 0.02159 0.016 0.39187 Franklin NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.022 2.72956 2.58589 1.95379 1.36477 0.81887 2.55716 0.10056 0.20589 0.15254 0.13238 Knox NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00059 0.14342 0.13587 0.10266 0.07171 0.04303 0.13436 0.00528 0.00959 0.0071 0.33458 Licking NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00071 0.3813 0.36123 0.27293 0.19065 0.11439 0.35721 0.01405 0.02996 0.02219 0.3805 Madison NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 1E-04 0.1012 0.09587 0.07244 0.0506 0.03036 0.09481 0.00373 0.01261 0.00935 0.67083 Butler NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00266 0.87216 0.82626 0.62428 0.43608 0.26165 0.81708 0.03213 0.05304 0.0393 0.20172 Clermont NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00236 0.47235 0.44749 0.3381 0.23618 0.1417 0.44252 0.0174 0.03349 0.02481 0.1798 Clinton NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.0002 0.10444 0.09894 0.07476 0.05222 0.03133 0.09784 0.00385 0.00874 0.00647 0.57035 Hamilton NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0



### VOC 0.01708 2.05852 1.95017 1.47346 1.02926 0.61755 1.9285 0.07584 0.17177 0.12727 0.02584 Warren 

### NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0



### VOC 0.00139 0.50128 0.4749 0.35881 0.25064 0.15038 0.46962 0.01847 0.02752 0.02039 0.19357 

### Area SCCs

Emissions (tons per day)



### Area SCC list and descriptions: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2011nei/2011_neiv1_tsd_draft.pdf Appendix F - Page 6C

o

u

n t y p

o l l

u t

a

n t 2

5 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 2

5 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 2

5 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 3 2

5 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 4 2

5 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 5 2

5 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 1 2

5 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 2

5 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 3 2

5 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 4 2

5 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 5 2

5 0 1 0 6 0 0 5 2

Ashtabula NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.02667 0.05208 0.00984 0.00405 0.00031 0.00085 0.00166 0.01343 0.00781 0.0006 0.04691 Cuyahoga NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.59958 1.17065 0.22126 0.09105 0.00699 0.01915 0.03739 0.30182 0.17547 0.01344 0.46219 Geauga NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.07276 0.14207 0.02685 0.01105 0.00085 0.00232 0.00454 0.03663 0.02129 0.00163 0.03468 Lake NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.07451 0.14547 0.02749 0.01131 0.00087 0.00238 0.00465 0.03751 0.02181 0.00167 0.08207 Lorain NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.10454 0.2041 0.03858 0.01587 0.00122 0.00334 0.00652 0.05262 0.03059 0.00234 0.12634 Medina NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.06106 0.11923 0.02253 0.00927 0.00071 0.00195 0.00381 0.03074 0.01787 0.00137 0.06725 Portage NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.06438 0.12571 0.02376 0.00978 0.00075 0.00206 0.00402 0.03241 0.01884 0.00144 0.06823 Summit NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.17503 0.34174 0.06459 0.02658 0.00204 0.00559 0.01092 0.08811 0.05122 0.00392 0.19784 Delaware NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.06291 0.12283 0.02322 0.00955 0.00073 0.00201 0.00392 0.03167 0.01841 0.00141 0.05624 Fairfield NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.03353 0.06546 0.01237 0.00509 0.00039 0.00107 0.00209 0.01688 0.00981 0.00075 0.04711 Franklin NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.38538 0.75244 0.14221 0.05852 0.00449 0.01231 0.02403 0.194 0.11278 0.00864 0.41495 Knox NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.0116 0.02264 0.00428 0.00176 0.00014 0.00037 0.00072 0.00584 0.00339 0.00026 0.01841 Licking NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.03681 0.07188 0.01358 0.00559 0.00043 0.00118 0.0023 0.01853 0.01077 0.00083 1.23888 Madison NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.01813 0.03539 0.00669 0.00275 0.00021 0.00058 0.00113 0.00912 0.0053 0.00041 0.02216 Butler NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.11281 0.22026 0.04163 0.01713 0.00131 0.0036 0.00704 0.05679 0.03302 0.00253 0.12067 Clermont NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.06134 0.11976 0.02264 0.00931 0.00071 0.00196 0.00383 0.03088 0.01795 0.00138 0.06974 Clinton NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.00892 0.01741 0.00329 0.00135 0.0001 0.00028 0.00056 0.00449 0.00261 0.0002 0.01708 Hamilton NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0



### VOC 0.2767 0.54025 0.10211 0.04202 0.00322 0.00884 0.01726 0.13929 0.08098 0.0062 0.31853 Warren 

### NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0



### VOC 0.05589 0.10911 0.02062 0.00849 0.00065 0.00178 0.00349 0.02813 0.01636 0.00125 0.0657 

### Area SCCs

Emissions (tons per day)



### Area SCC list and descriptions: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2011nei/2011_neiv1_tsd_draft.pdf Appendix F - Page 7C

o

u

n t y p

o l l

u t

a

n t 2

5 0 1 0 6 0 0 5 3 2

5 0 1 0 6 0 1 0 0 2

5 0 1 0 6 0 2 0 1 2

5 0 1 0 8 0 0 5 0 2

5 0 1 0 8 0 1 0 0 2

5 0 5 0 3 0 1 2 0 2

4 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 2

4 0 1 0 7 5 0 0 0 2

4 0 1 0 8 0 0 0 0 2

4 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

5 0 1 0 5 5 1 2 0

Ashtabula NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.06146 0.08888 0.07413 0.03698 0.00192 0.00485 0 0 0 0 0 Cuyahoga NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.60563 0.84268 0.70729 0.14778 0.00767 0.04626 0.09674 0.03714 0.01921 8.8122 0.48439 Geauga NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.04544 0.06023 0.05307 0.04456 0.00231 0.00347 0 0.00115 0 0.10769 0.09807 Lake NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.10754 0.1424 0.12559 0.04702 0.00244 0.00821 0.2741 0.01896 0.05146 2.52358 0 Lorain NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.16555 0.22815 0.19334 0.07989 0.00415 0.01264 0 0.00714 0.01764 0.68271 0.09807 Medina NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.08812 0.12641 0.10291 0.15286 0.00793 0.00673 0.05039 0.00714 0 1.20286 0 Portage NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.0894 0.13167 0.10782 0.01716 0.00089 0.00705 0.03124 0.00019 0 0 0 Summit NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.25924 0.38396 0.31267 0.1002 0.0052 0.02045 0 0.01966 0 4.2405 0.09807 Delaware NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.07369 0.28499 0.08888 0.06616 0.00343 0.00581 0 0 0.00294 0.72944 0 Fairfield NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.08951 0.2843 0.07445 0.02459 0.00128 0.00487 0.03124 0 0 0.94279 0 Franklin NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.54373 2.31255 0.6558 0.14749 0.00765 0.04289 0.00504 0.00115 0 5.24018 0.61296 Knox NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.03497 0.11709 0.02909 0.02181 0.00113 0.0019 0.03124 0 0 0.88386 0.01635 Licking NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0 0.3913 0.0979 0.03059 0.00159 0.0064 0 0 0 0.9631 0.09807 Madison NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.0421 0.13655 0.03501 0.02272 0.00118 0.00229 0 0 0.00294 0.09143 0.01635 Butler NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.15812 0.24496 0.19071 0.07928 0.00411 0.01247 0.10178 0.00714 0.00156 2.66784 0.01635 Clermont NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.09138 0.14346 0.11021 0.04194 0.00218 0.00721 0.00504 0 0 1.11143 0.09807 Clinton NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VOC 0.03245 0.11254 0.02699 0.02009 0.00104 0.00177 0 0 0.00294 0.36167 0.01635 Hamilton NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0



### VOC 0.41738 0.64771 0.50341 0.09309 0.00483 0.03292 0 0.15358 0.02734 5.70344 0.34867 Warren 

### NOx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0



### VOC 0.08609 0.12735 0.10384 0.04153 0.00215 0.00679 0.05744 0.00115 0 0 0.09807 

### Area SCCs

Emissions (tons per day)



### Area SCC list and descriptions: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2011nei/2011_neiv1_tsd_draft.pdf Appendix F - Page 8C

o

u

n t y p

o l l

u t

a

n t 2

5 0 5 0 4 0 1 2 0 2

4 0 1 0 6 5 0 0 0 2

4 0 1 0 8 5 0 0 0

Ashtabula NOx 0 0 0

VOC 0 0 0 Cuyahoga NOx 0 0 0

VOC 0.5331081 0.014362 0.0182936 Geauga NOx 0 0 0

VOC 0.1079362 0 0 Lake NOx 0 0 0

VOC 0 0.0037718 0 Lorain NOx 0 0 0

VOC 0.1079362 0.0071242 0 Medina NOx 0 0 0

VOC 0 0 0 Portage NOx 0 0 0

VOC 0 0.0063663 0 Summit NOx 0 0 0

VOC 0.1079362 0 0 Delaware NOx 0 0 0

VOC 0 0 0 Fairfield NOx 0 0 0

VOC 0 0 0 Franklin NOx 0 0 0

VOC 0.6746014 0.0002822 0 Knox NOx 0 0 0

VOC 0.0179894 0 0 Licking NOx 0 0 0

VOC 0.1079362 0 0 Madison NOx 0 0 0

VOC 0.0179894 0 0 Butler NOx 0 0 0

VOC 0.0179894 0 0 Clermont NOx 0 0 0

VOC 0.1079362 0.000288 0 Clinton NOx 0 0 0

VOC 0.0179894 0 0 Hamilton NOx 0 0 0



### VOC 0.3837348 0.0003386 0 Warren 

### NOx 0 0 0



### VOC 0.1079362 0 0

Emissions (tons per day) 

### Area SCCs

Area SCC list and descriptions: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2011nei/2011_neiv1_tsd_draft.pdf Appendix F - Page 9

### Area SCC list and descriptions: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2011nei/2011_neiv1_tsd_draft.pdf Appendix F - Page 10

# Appendix G 2008 Ozone Mobile Sources Emissions Inventory for Ohio Portion of the Cincinnati Ozone Nonattainment Area

# 2008	Ozone	Mobile	Source	Emissions

Inventory	for	Ohio	Portion	of	the Cincinnati	Ozone	Nonattainment	Area Includes the counties of Butler, Clermont, Clinton, Hamilton, and Warren in Ohio.

Emission estimates for the Year 2008

R evised	June	2014

P repared for the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency by

OKI Regional Council of Governments

# 2 OKI 2008 Ozone Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for Ohio Portion of Cincinnati Ozone Nonattainment Area, June 2014

# 3 OKI 2008 Ozone Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for Ohio Portion of Cincinnati Ozone Nonattainment Area, June 2014 

## Acknowledgments

Title 2008 Ozone Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for Ohio Portion of Cincinnati Ozone Nonattainment Area

Abstract This report was prepared for the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. The Cincinnati Ozone Nonattainment Area includes a portion of Dearborn County Indiana, the counties of Boone, Campbell, Kenton in Kentucky, and the counties of Butler, Clermont, Clinton, Hamilton, and Warren in Ohio. Clinton County is outside of OKI’s MPO area with emission estimates prepared by the Ohio Department of Transportation. This report includes emission estimates for year 2008 only and only for the Ohio portion of the nonattainment area. EPA’s Motor Vehicle Emission Simulation (MOVES) 2010b was used to generate the emission inventory.

Date June 2014

Agency Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments Mark Policinski, Executive Director Robert Koehler, P.E., Deputy Director

Project Manager

Andrew J. Reser, AICP

Project Staff Larry Buckler Nino Brunello, P.E., ODOT Division of Planning

The preparation of this document was financed cooperatively by the Federal Highway Administration, the Federal Transit Administration, the Commonwealth of Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, the Ohio Department of Transportation, and the units of local and county government in the OKI region. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this document are those of the OKI Regional Council of Governments and are not necessarily those of the U.S. Department of Transportation. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.

# 4 OKI 2008 Ozone Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for Ohio Portion of Cincinnati Ozone Nonattainment Area, June 2014

# 5 OKI 2008 Ozone Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for Ohio Portion of Cincinnati Ozone Nonattainment Area, June 2014 

# Year	2008	MOBILE	Source	Ozone	Emissions Inventory	for	Ohio	Portion	of	the	Cincinnati Ozone	Nonattainment	Area

This report was prepared for the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. The Cincinnati nonattainment area includes a portion of Dearborn County Indiana, the counties of Boone, Campbell, Kenton in Kentucky, and the counties of Butler, Clermont, Clinton, Hamilton, and Warren in Ohio. Clinton County Ohio is outside OKI’s MPO boundaries. The Ohio Department of Transportation prepares emission estimates for Clinton County. This report includes emission estimates for the year 2008 only. EPA’s Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator (MOVES) 2010b model was used to generate the vehicle emission inventory. Details on the various county data inputs used to generate the inventory are described in Table 3. Emissions of the ozone precursors, VOC’s, and NO x 

### , were generated.

Table 1 shows daily mobile source ozone emissions in tons per summer day for each county in the Ohio portion of the Cincinnati Nonattainment Area, including Clinton County. Emissions by road type is shown in Table 2.

# 6 OKI 2008 Ozone Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for Ohio Portion of Cincinnati Ozone Nonattainment Area, June 2014 

### Table 1

**Mobile Source Emissions by State/County for the Ohio Portion**  **of Cincinnati Ozone Nonattainment Area (tpsd)** 

State 2008 Ohio Butler

VMT 8,218,725 VOC 10.32 NOx 18.76 Clermont VMT 5,475,869 VOC 6.88 NOx 12.50 Hamilton VMT 24,123,110 VOC 30.30 NOx 55.08 Warren VMT 6,192,386 VOC 7.78 NOx 14.14 OKI OH Total

VMT 44,010,090 VOC 55.28 NOx 100.48 Clinton VMT 1,939,190 VOC 2.51 NOx 5.50 OH NA Area VOC Total 57.79 OH NA Area NOx Total 

### 105.98

# 7 OKI 2008 Ozone Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for Ohio Portion of Cincinnati Ozone Nonattainment Area, June 2014 

### Table 2 **VOC and NOx Emissions by Road Type (tons per summer day)** Butler RoadTypeID RoadDescription VOC NOx

1 Off-Network 7.20 4.21

2 Rural Restricted Access 0.06 0.40 3 Rural Unrestricted Access 0.29 1.50

4 Urban Restricted Access 1.11 6.13

5 Urban Unrestricted Access 1.67 6.52

Butler Total 10.32 18.76 Clermont RoadTypeID RoadDescription VOC NOx

1 Off-Network 4.79 2.81

2 Rural Restricted Access 0.04 0.27 3 Rural Unrestricted Access 0.19 1.00

4 Urban Restricted Access 0.74 4.09

5 Urban Unrestricted Access 1.11 4.34

Clermont Total 6.88 12.50 Hamilton RoadTypeID RoadDescription VOC NOx

1 Off-Network 21.12 12.36

2 Rural Restricted Access 0.18 1.18 3 Rural Unrestricted Access 0.85 4.41

4 Urban Restricted Access 3.25 18.00

5 Urban Unrestricted Access 4.90 19.12

Hamilton Total 30.30 55.08 Warren RoadTypeID RoadDescription VOC NOx

1 Off-Network 5.42 3.17

2 Rural Restricted Access 0.05 0.30 3 Rural Unrestricted Access 0.22 1.13

4 Urban Restricted Access 0.83 4.62

5 Urban Unrestricted Access 1.26 4.91

Warren Total 7.78 14.14 Clinton RoadTypeID RoadDescription VOC NOx

1 Off-Network 1.28 0.76

2 Rural Restricted Access 0.05 0.24

3 Rural Unrestricted Access 0.18 0.61

4 Urban Restricted Access 0.25 1.28

5 Urban Unrestricted Access 0.76 2.61

Clinton Total 2.51 5.50

# 8 OKI 2008 Ozone Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for Ohio Portion of Cincinnati Ozone Nonattainment Area, June 2014 

## Mobile Source Emission Forecast Process

Emission Factor Model OKI’s inventory assessment utilized U.S.EPA’s emissions model MOVES 2010b to generate VOC and NO X 

### emissions. Table 3 summarizes the settings used in the MOVES run specification file. Table 4 lists the data used in the MOVES County-Data Manager. Further technical details on the use of MOVES are found in the appendix to the OKI report “Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for Cincinnati PM2.5 Nonattainment Area” , revised December 2010.

**Table 3**

**MOVES RunSpec**  **Parameter Settings**  MOVES 2010b , default database 20121030 Scale County, Inventory Time Span Time aggregation = Hour July weekday, July meteorological data All hours of day selected Weekdays only Geographic Bounds C ustom Domains 1) 4 Ohio counties and Lawrenceburg IN Vehicles/Equipment All source types, gasoline and diesel Road Type All road types including off

- network Pollutants and Processes Total gaseous hydrocarbons, non

- methane hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds, carbon monoxide, oxides of nitrogen Strategies none General Output Units= U.S. ton , joules and miles Output Emissions Time = 24

- hour day, Location =county, on

- road emission by road type Advanced Performance none

**Table 4**

**County Data Manager Data Source**  Source Type Population Local and default. Local data from ODOT (2010) motor vehicle registration data. Default data used for source types 11,41,51,52,53,54,61 and 62. Annual growth rates used to adjust to 2008 analysis year. Vehicle Type VMT Local and default. HPMSVTypeYear VMT= AADVMT from OKI travel demand model with EPA’s daily to annual VMT converter applied. monthVMTFraction = default. dayVMTFraction=default, hourVMTFraction=local. I/M Programs Default

# 9 OKI 2008 Ozone Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for Ohio Portion of Cincinnati Ozone Nonattainment Area, June 2014 

### Fuel Formulation Default Fuel Supply Default Meteorology Data Default Ramp Fraction Local. OKI travel demand model. Road Type Distribution Local. OKI travel demand model. Age Distribution Local and default. Local data from ODOT (2010) m otor vehicle registration data. Default data used for source types 11,41,51,52,53,54,61 and 62. Average Speed Distribution Local. OKI travel demand model.



## OKI Travel Demand Model Vehicle miles traveled, vehicle hours and average speeds were estimated using the OKI Travel Demand Model Version 7.6. The OKI Travel Demand Model is composed of CUBE Voyager programs and a series of FORTRAN programs written by OKI. It is a state of the practice model that uses the standard 4 phase sequential modeling approach of trip generation, distribution, modal choice and assignment. The model uses demographic and land use data and capacity and free-flow speed characteristics for each roadway segment in the network to produce a “loaded” highway network with forecasted traffic volumes with revised speeds based on specified speed/capacity relationships.

Travel analysis zones are the basic geographic unit for estimating travel in the OKI model. The OKI region is subdivided into 1608 traffic analysis zones to permit detail as well as manageability. A variety of socioeconomic data items are used in the OKI transportation planning process. These data are used primarily to forecast future travel patterns by serving as independent variables in OKI trip generation equations. The following categories of planning data are utilized:

• Population (household and group quarter)

• Households

• Household vehicles

• Employment (by employment category and zone of work)

• Labor force participation (by zone of residence)

• Area type The principal data requirements of the OKI travel demand forecasting model are population and employment. From these variables, other characteristics including households, labor force, and personal vehicles may be derived. Chapter 5 of OKI 2030 Regional Transportation Plan 2008 Update provides a complete demographic overview of the region.

OKI utilizes both base year (2005) and future year data (2010, 2020 and 2030) in the planning process. Planning data are maintained at the Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) level, and originate in the 2000 Census of Population and Housing. Base year 2005 and future year data for each variable are developed through various methods. More detailed explanation of base year and future year data generation for each of the

# 10 OKI 2008 Ozone Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for Ohio Portion of Cincinnati Ozone Nonattainment Area, June 2014 

### above-mentioned categories of planning data follows. All of the variables represent the latest OKI planning assumptions. 

## Population Base and Future Year Data: Population data for base year 2005 and future years 2010, 2020 and 2030 originate with the 2000 Census of Population and Housing. Utilizing ArcView GIS, population data at the zonal level for 2000 was derived from the area proportion allocation of block level population.

As a tri-state regional planning agency, OKI uses county level projections as prepared by the respective state data centers (Ohio Department of Development Office of Strategic Research, Kentucky State Data Center and Indiana Business Research Center) as control totals. The most current projections (years 2005 to 2030) were released by the Ohio and Indiana state data centers in 2003 and the Kentucky State Data Center in 2004. Population projections at the zonal level are calculated by multiplying household size by the projected zonal households. Household size is factored so that, in each county, the sum of the zonal populations equals the control total.



## Households Base Year Data: Household data for base year 2005 originates with the 2000 Census of Population and Housing. Utilizing the geographic information system ArcMap, household data at the zonal level for 2000 was derived from the area proportion allocation of block level households. Year 2000 household data was updated to 2005 with residential building permits issued between January 2000 and December 2004. The residential building locations were geo-coded in ArcMap, then aggregated to the TAZs. The housing unit totals for each TAZ were converted to households by applying a vacancy rate, an adjustment for permitted but unbuilt units, and subtracting demolitions (where data was available). These households were then added to the year Census 2000 zonal household total to arrive at 2005 households for each TAZ.

Future Year Data: The preparation of household projections was accomplished by calculating the number of households for a projected county population using ratios of householders to total population by age specific cohorts derived from the 2000 Census for each analysis year. Disaggregation to TAZs was determined by historical trends, existing and future land use, topography, flood plain information, availability of land, local knowledge and other factors.



## Household Vehicles Base and Future Year Data: Base and future year household vehicle data were obtained from the 2000 Census of Population and Housing. The 2000 Census is the only source of household vehicle data available at the block group level. Average vehicles per household were calculated for block groups then applied to the TAZs associated with each block group. The 2005, 2010, 2020 and 2030 vehicles per household level was held at the 2000 level based on the fact that, since 2002, the number of vehicles per household has exceeded the number of drivers per household.

# 11 OKI 2008 Ozone Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for Ohio Portion of Cincinnati Ozone Nonattainment Area, June 2014 

## Labor Force Base and Future Year Data: The OKI labor force is a function of the population as determined by a labor force participation ratio (the number of employed persons in the labor force per persons 16 and over). Household data for base year 2005 originates with the 2000 Census of Population and Housing. Utilizing the geographic information system ArcMap, household data at the zonal level for 2000 was derived from the area proportion allocation of block group level employed labor force. The labor force projections for 2005, 2010, 2020 and 2030 were based on the most recent projections of national labor force participation rates by age and sex cohorts from the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics for each of those years. These rates were then applied to the projected county age/sex cohorts and adjusted to eliminate the unemployed to arrive at a county employed labor force control total. Employed labor force at the zonal level is calculated by multiplying the labor force participation rate by the zonal population. The labor force participation rate is adjusted so that, in each county, the sum of the zonal labor force counts equals the control total. 

## Employment Base Year Data: Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW or ES202) data for 2005 was utilized as the primary tool to calculate employment at the zonal level. Individual business records containing physical location, number of employees and SIC code were geocoded through ArcMap and aggregated to the TAZ level. This data set was supplemented by other sources of data to complete the commuting employment picture in the OKI region. Each zone’s employment was divided according to the SIC code into three classes (retail, office, industrial) based upon the potential for generating trips.

Future Year Data: For future year employment projection, calculation was first made of the employment at the regional level. At the regional level, employment is a calculation of the region’s employed labor force minus workers who live in the region but commute out to work, plus workers who live outside the region but commute in to work. The regional total was disaggregated first to the county level based on historic trends and expected changes in the county’s share of the region’s employment and then to the TAZ level. Disaggregation to TAZs was determined by historical trends, existing and future land use, topography, flood plain information, availability of land, local knowledge and other factors. 

## Area Type Base and Future Year Data: For each analysis year, each TAZ is assigned an area type designation as CBD, Urban, Suburban or Rural based on population and employment densities.

Model Calibration OKI’s Travel Demand Model has been validated to obse rved traffic volumes for the model base year 2005. The modeling network encompasses the entire ozone Maintenance area with the exception of Clinton County, Ohio. The modeling network also includes Greene, Miami and Montgomery counties in Ohio and the remainder of Dearborn County Indiana. The difference between estimated vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and 2005 observed VMT is less than 1%. A highway screenline analysis compares the screenline

# 12 OKI 2008 Ozone Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for Ohio Portion of Cincinnati Ozone Nonattainment Area, June 2014 

### observed and simulated traffic volume discrepancies with the ODOT standard of maximum desirable deviation. The comparison shows that the model performs at a satisfactory level and all the errors were under the ODOT curve. Further information can be found in OKI’s 2007 report, “ OKI/MVRPC Travel Demand Model Methodology/ Validation Report ”. For the calibration, OKI used over 3000 traffic counts collected through 2006 by the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT), the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, many county and local governments, transportation engineering consultants, and OKI. These traffic counts cover nearly 50% percent of the links in the OKI portion of the modeling network. The methodology provides consistency with past emission inventory and conformity analysis work performed by OKI.

Local Inputs and Post-Model Processing OKI incorporates a variety of sources of local data to both improve and confirm the accuracy of VMT, as well as other travel-related parameters. Free flow speeds used on the highway and transit networks are based on travel time studies performed locally. The OKI post-processing program, IMPACT, uses the loaded highway network to generate VMT by hour, VMT by speed distribution and VMT by facility type. These tables are then included as input into MOVES. Two separate sets of VMT tables are generated: one for the four Ohio counties plus Dearborn County Indiana, and a second for the three Kentucky counties. The VMT by hour tables utilize hourly traffic distribution and directional split factors for different roadway types as developed by OKI. The main source of the data was the permanent traffic counting stations located throughout the OKI region for the years of 2004-2006. This data was supplemented with data collected at coverage count stations (locations with counts taken on only one-two days). The stations were classified by area type: urban and rural, and functional classification: freeway, arterial and collector. Speeds representing various “loaded” conditions (with traffic volumes) are estimated using techniques from the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual. This permits the estimation of speeds as conditions vary from hour to hour on the different facility types throughout the region. The IMPACT program performs the appropriate summation by area and roadway type as well as regional totals. OKI has also developed seasonal conversion factors to adjust traffic volumes to summer conditions. The factors were derived from local data collected at permanent traffic counting stations during 1994-1997 utilizing the average daily traffic monthly conversion factors for June, July and August. Further information on OKI’s IMPACT program is documented in the report, “Travel Demand Model Summary Reporting and Impact Summary Reporting: OKI/MVRPC Travel Demand Model User’s Guide”, OKI 2003.

# Appendix H

Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates

# C ENTRAL 

# O HIO 

# O N 

# -R OAD 

# M OBILE 

# E MISSION 

# E STIMATES 

# P REPARED FOR 

# O HIO 

# E NVIRONMENTAL 

# P ROTECTION 

# A GENCY 

# C ENTRAL 

# O HIO 

# Y EAR 

# 2008 I NVENTORY FOR THE



# 8-H OUR 

# O ZONE 

# S TANDARD

J ULY 

### , 2014

111 Liberty Street Columbus, Ohio 43215 614-228- 2663 www.morpc.orgCentral Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates J uly, 2014 **ii** 

### TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND ................... ........................................................................................ 1

1.1 I NTRODUCTION

................................................... ................................................................................................... 1 1.2 B ACKGROUND

................................................... .................................................................................................... 1 1.3 G EOGRAPHIC A REA OF A NALYSIS

................................................... ...................................................................... 2 2.0 QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS ...................... ................................................................................................... 3

2.1 A NALYSIS Y EARS

................................................... ............................................................................................... 3 2.2 G ENERAL M ETHODOLOGY

................................................... ................................................................................. 3 2.3 T RAVEL D EMAND M ODEL

................................................... .................................................................................. 4 2.3.1 I NDEPENDENT V ARIABLES

................................................... ................................................................................ 4 2.3.2 M ODEL N ETWORKS

................................................... ........................................................................................... 4 2.3.3 L OADED H IGHWAY N ETWORKS

................................................... ........................................................................ 5 2.3.4 I NTRA Z ONAL T RIPS

.................................................... .......................................................................................... 5 2.4 E MISSION F ACTOR G ENERATION

................................................... ........................................................................ 5 2.4.1 V EHICLE A GE D ISTRIBUTION

................................................... .......................................................................... 20 2.4.2 T EMPERATURES

................................................... .............................................................................................. 20 2.5 C OMPUTATIONS M ETHODOLOGY

................................................... ..................................................................... 20 2.5.1 A REAS WITH R EGIONAL M ODEL

................................................... ..................................................................... 20 2.5.2 A REAS WITHOUT R EGIONAL M ODEL

................................................... ............................................................... 21

3.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS ......................... ................................................................................................... 22

3.1.1 A REAS WITHIN T HE R EGIONAL T RAVEL D EMAND M ODEL

................................................... ............................. 22 3.1.2 A REAS PARTIALLY WITHIN T HE R EGIONAL T RAVEL D EMAND M ODEL

................................................... ........... 22 3.1.3 A REA OUTSIDE R EGIONAL T RAVEL D EMAND M ODEL

................................................... ..................................... 24 3.1.4 T OTAL E MISSIONS FOR THE C OLUMBUS /C ENTRAL O HIO AREA

................................................... ....................... 24 3.2 E MISSIONS S UMMARY FOR THE C OLUMBUS /C ENTRAL O HIO A REA

................................................... ................. 25

APPENDIX ........................................... ..................................................................................................................... 26 

### L IST OF TABLES

T ABLE 1

– MOVES I NPUTS

................................................... ......................................................................................... 6 T ABLE 2

– T EMPERATURE AND R ELATIVE H UMIDITY D ATA

................................................... ....................................... 8 T ABLE 3

– R

AMP F RACTIONS

................................................... ...................................................................................... 8 T ABLE 4

– S OURCE T YPE P OPULATION FOR YEAR 2008 ............................................... .................................................. 9 T ABLE 5

– V EHICLE A GE D ISTRIBUTION

................................................... ................................................................... 10 T ABLE 6

– R OAD T YPE D ISTRIBUTION

................................................... ....................................................................... 14 T ABLE 7

– Y EARLY HPMS VMT FOR 2008................................................ .................................................................. 15 T ABLE 8

– H OURLY VMT F RACTIONS

................................................... ....................................................................... 15 T ABLE 9

– S AMPLE E MISSION F ILE (R ATE PER D ISTANCE ) FOR YEAR 2008 ............................................... ................... 19 T ABLE 10

– S AMPLE E MISSION F ILE (R ATE PER V EHICLE ) FOR YEAR 2008 ............................................... ................... 19 T ABLE 11: E MISSION E STIMATIONS FOR O N -R OAD M OBILE S OURCES

- F RANKLIN C OUNTY ...................................... 22 T ABLE 12: E MISSION E STIMATIONS FOR O N -R OAD M OBILE S OURCES

- D ELAWARE C OUNTY .................................... 22 T ABLE 13: E MISSION E STIMATIONS FOR O N -R OAD M OBILE S OURCES

- L ICKING C OUNTY ......................................... 22 T ABLE 14 A : E MISSION E STIMATIONS FOR F AIRFIELD C OUNTY WITHIN THE T RAVEL D EMAND M ODEL A REA ............ 22 T ABLE 14 B : E MISSION E STIMATIONS FOR F AIRFIELD C OUNTY OUTSIDE OF THE T RAVEL D EMAND M ODEL A REA

U SING HPMS DATA

.................................................... ......................................................................................... 23 T ABLE 14 C : E MISSION E STIMATIONS FOR F AIRFIELD C OUNTY

................................................... ................................. 23 T ABLE 15 A : E MISSION E STIMATIONS FOR M ADISON C OUNTY WITHIN THE T RAVEL D EMAND M ODEL A REA ............. 23 T ABLE 15 B : E MISSION E STIMATIONS FOR M ADISON C OUNTY OUTSIDE OF THE T RAVEL D EMAND M ODEL A REA

- U SING HPMS DATA

.................................................... ......................................................................................... 23 T ABLE 15 C : E MISSION E STIMATIONS FOR M ADISON C OUNTY

................................................... .................................. 24 T ABLE 16: E MISSION E STIMATIONS FOR K NOX C OUNTY

–

USING ONLY HPMS ............................................... ........... 24 T ABLE 17: E MISSION E STIMATIONS FOR O N -R OAD M OBILE S OURCES FOR C OLUMBUS /C ENTRAL O HIO .................... 24 T ABLE 18: VOC E MISSION I NVENTORY S UMMARY

................................................... .................................................. 25 T ABLE 19: NO X E MISSION I NVENTORY S UMMARY

............................................... E RROR ! B OOKMARK NOT DEFINED

.Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates J uly, 2014 **iii** 

### LIST OF FIGURES

**F IGURE**  **1: C**  **OLUMBUS ,**  **C ENTRAL**  **O HIO**  **, 8-H**  **OUR MARGINAL N**  **ON**

**- ATTAINMENT**  **A REA**  ......................................... 2Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates J uly, 2014 **1** 

## 1.0 Introduction & Background

1.1 Introduction **This Report documents the on-road mobile emission estimates for the Columbus and Central Ohio area, in conjunction with the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA) State**  **Implementation Plan (SIP) update for Central Ohio area, primarily to establish base year inventory for the ozone marginal nonattainment area. Currently the region is designated as**  **marginal nonattainment for 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), Federal Register Vol. 77, No. 98, FR 30141, May 21, 2012.This report presents the summary of**  **on road mobile emissions for the analysis year 2008 as the base year. Year 2008 computations for VOC (volatile organic compounds, gaseous compounds made of carbon and hydrogen) and**  **NOx (Oxides of Nitrogen), are presented in this report. VOC and NOx interacting with sunlight in the lower atmosphere develops the primary constituent of smog, Ozone, a criteria pollutant.**  **These emissions documented here are the emissions due to on-road vehicles for the counties in the marginal nonattainment area of Central Ohio. The methodologies in computing emissions**  **and forecasting models used are also summarized in this report.**



### 1.2 Background **Under the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA), because of the 1997 eight-hour ozone standard, on April 15, 2004, U.S. EPA issued final designations with regard to the 8-hour ozone**  **standard, designating the central Ohio basic non-attainment area to be the six counties of Franklin, Delaware, Licking, Madison, Fairfield and Knox counties were designated as a basic**  **nonattainment area for ozone. The CAAA defines nonattainment areas as geographic regions of the country that do not meet the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). In**  **nonattainment areas, air quality implementation plans must be developed that identify strategies and programs that nonattainment areas will implement to provide the emission reductions**  **needed for the areas to meet the NAAQS. In Ohio, OEPA is the lead agency for coordinating development of the SIP. The SIP includes actions done on a statewide basis as well as actions**  **done within each specific nonattainment area of the state to achieve the air quality standards. Re-**  designation of an area from ‘eight **-hour ozone basic non-** attainment’ to attainment is based **on criteria and guidance set forth by U.S. EPA. Re-designation requests to attainment include SIP revisions that document that the NAAQS have been met and provide a maintenance plan to**  **ensure meeting the standards for the next ten years. One of the items of documentation contained in a re-designation request is three consecutive years of air quality monitoring data**  **that meet the NAAQS. A Re-designation request to attainment was submitted to EPA in March 2009. This re-designation request to attainment was approved on September 15, 2009, based**  **on 1997 eight-hour ozone standard, which is 80 ppb (0.08 ppm).**

**In September 2009, Central Ohio area reached attainment, by re-designation, based on 1997 eight-hour ozone standard. However**  on May 21, 2012 US EPA’s Federal Register notice**designated Columbus Central Ohio area as marginal nonattainment area for the 2008 eight hour ozone standard, Federal Register Vol. 77, No. 98, FR 30141. Thus SIP update is required**  **to establish base year as 2008 for Ozone. This report updates ozone emissions inventory using MOVES software program.** Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates J uly, 2014 **2** 

### 1.3 Geographic Area of Analysis

**The six-county marginal non-attainment areas consist of tw o metropolitan planning**  **organizations (MPOs), MORPC and LCATS and also areas** outside of the two MPO’s in **Fairfield, Madison, and Knox Counties, illustrated in Figure 1. The MORPC transportation planning area consists of Franklin County, Delaware County, Pataskala and Etna Township in**  **Licking County, and Violet and Bloom Townships in Fairfield County. The LCATS transportation planning area covers the remainder of Licking County. The travel demand model area**  **comprising MORPC and LCATS transportation planning areas is illustrated in Figure 1. Donut areas, referring to Figure 1, are the counties or portions of counties that are outside of the travel**  **demand model area. As illustrated, these are portions of Fairfield and Madison counties and all of Knox county. On-road mobile emissions analysis methodologies for counties within the travel**  **demand area, as well as for counties outside the model area are discussed in the next sections. The geographic area of re-designation request for the Columbus, Central Ohio area, comprises**  **of six-counties: Franklin county, Delaware county, Licking county, Fairfield county, Madison county, and Knox county.** 

**F IGURE**  **1: C OLUMBUS**  **, C**  **ENTRAL O**  **HIO ,**  **8-H OUR MARGINAL**  **N ON** 

**- ATTAINMENT**  **A REA** Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates J uly, 2014 **3** 

## 2.0 QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS

**The methodologies used and background information for estimating on-road mobile emissions are discussed in the foregoing sections for the geographic area of 8-hour ozone non-attainment** 

**area.** 

### 2.1 Analysis Years **Analysis year used in this documentation is 2008 since the need for establishing the base year as 2008 for the region's ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Methodology**  **for emissions analysis is presented next in this document for year 2008.** 

### 2.2 General Methodology

**Evaluating emissions for year 2008 analysis requires several data inputs, discussed in the foregoing sections. Among these, vehicle travel characteristics data can be obtained from**  **regionally maintained travel demand model. Travel demand model provides daily traffic volumes, congested travel times, speeds, v/c (volume to capacity ratios), VMT (vehicle miles**  **traveled), VHT (vehicle hours traveled) among other input travel characteristics data used in evaluating emissions in this report. Areas that are not within the regional travel demand model**  **boundary utilized HPMS (Highway Performance Monitoring Systems) based travel characteristics data. Thus, the travel demand model is used in evaluating emissions for**  **Franklin county, Delaware county, and Licking county. Both the travel demand model as well as HPMS is used in evaluating emissions for Fairfield county and Madison county. HPMS only is**  **used for the Knox county, in evaluating emissions. Each of the aforementioned process is detailed further in sections 2.5.1 and 2.5.2.** Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates J uly, 2014 **4** 

### 2.3 Travel Demand Model **For these analyses the latest planning assumptions available for the Central Ohio area were used. For the travel demand model, model validation is a joint process between MORPC,**  **LCATS and the ODOT Office of Technical Services. In December 2004, a new model was accepted and installed for use at MORPC. The new model covers all of the MORPC and**  **LCATS area including portions of Pickaway, Madison and Union Counties along with additional portions of Fairfield County outside of the MORPC MPO area. Further, MORPC continuously**  **updates the highway and transit network information and maintains accurate networks for future year analysis. The new model used is a multi-step tour-based model, incorporating more**  **advanced simulation methods than compared to traditional four step model. Thus model inputs were tested for quality control and quality assurance. Forecasted variables such as population,**  **employment, traffic counts, roadway network, etc. were developed by MORPC in coordination with LCATS and used for the analysis.** 

**Due to the advance simulation methods incorporated, there is some variation in model results from one complete model run to another with all of the same input data. MORPC performed a**  **check on this variability with regard to on-road mobile emission estimates. The emission estimates for several 2002 model runs were calculated. The variation in the emission estimates**  **were less than one-tenth of one percent (0.1%). Thus it was determined that the variability due to the simulation is insignificant.** 

2.3.1 Independent Variables

**Independent variables (land use/socio-economic data) were dev eloped as well as interpolated**  **for year 2008 analysis. Trip tables for the analysis year 2008 were interpolated. MORPC continually monitors land use, population and employment information. MORPC performs**  **complete land use inventories every five years. The complete documentation of the process and future forecasts is provided in 2012-2035 Transportation Plans completed in May 2012 by**  **MOPRC and LCATS.**

2.3.2 Model Networks

**MORPC staff in conjunction with LCATS and ODOT continuously update the model networks to accurately reflect projects in the current TIP and Metropolitan Transportation Plan. The**  **Transportation Plan horizon year for MORPC and LCATS is 2035. The model networks developed for this emission estimates is for the analysis year 2008.** Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates J uly, 2014 **5** 

### 2.3.3 Loaded Highway Networks

**Trip assignment was run for model year 2008 using CUBE. The assignment produced a loaded highway network for the analysis year. This loaded network files includes total volume for each**  **link in the network. Programming scripts in CUBE (a model software), illustrated in Appendix A, incorporate**  ODOT’s CMAQ process **, discussed in more detail in Section 2.5.1. The loaded highway network for the analysis year was split into separate files for each county. Each county**  **network was run independently through the CMAQ process for each analysis year, which combined the volumes and emission factors for computing VOC and NOx emissions for the**  **entire county.**

2.3.4 IntraZonal Trips

**Intrazonal trips are the trips that are generated with in a traffic analysis zone (TAZ), that use**  **local roads. Intrazonal trips do not get loaded onto the highway networks so Cube/Voyager emission calculation script requires a separate input file to account for these trips. Input files for**  **evaluating intrazonal emissions are intrazonal trips file, intrazonal area file, and intrazonal emissions factor file. These input files for the areas within the travel demand model area are for**  **Franklin county, Licking county, Delaware county, as well as for partial areas of Fairfield county and Madison county. The intrazonal trips were extracted from the trip tables using a**  **Cube/Voyager script.**



### 2.4 Emission Factor Generation

Base Year 2008

**U sing MOVES, emission factor files were generated for year-2008. Programs and**  **corresponding MOVES parameters were developed in consultation with OEPA.**

Technical Details

**Table 1 summarizes the settings used in the MOVES run specification file and the MOVES County-Data Manager. Further details in specific inputs that are not using default values are**  **provided below.**Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates J uly, 2014 **6** 

### Table 1

– MOVES Inputs RunSpec Parameter Settings **MOVES Version MOVES2010b**  **Scale Custom Domain**  **MOVES Modeling Technique** 

### Emission Factor Method **Rates per Profile (grams/vehicle) Rates per Distance (grams/mile)**  **Rates per Vehicle (grams/vehicle) Time Span**  **Time Aggregation: Hour 1 Month representing average annual temperatures**  **All hours of day selected 16 speed bins**  **Weekdays only Geographic Bounds**  **Franklin, Delaware, Licking, Fairfield, Madison & Knox Counties.**  **Vehicles/Equipment All source types, gasoline and diesel**  **Road Type All road types including off-network**  **Pollutants and Processes Total Gaseous Hydrocarbons, Non-Methane Hydrocarbons,**  **Volitile Organic Compounds, NO x**  

### , NO, NO **2,** 

### Total Energy **Consumption Strategies**  **None General Output**  **Units = grams, joules and miles Output Emissions**  **Time = hour, Location = custom area, on-road emission rates by road type and source use type.**  **Advance Performance None**  County Data Manager Sources **Source Type Population Combination of local and default data**  **Local data (2010) ODOT from motor vehicle registration Default data used for source types 41, 51, 54, 61, and 62**  **Future year growth rate based on MPO model Household growth rate.**  **Vehicle Type VMT Combination of local and default data**  **HPMSVTypeYear VMT = daily VMT from travel demand model**  **monthVMTFraction = default dayVMTFraction=default**  **hourVMTFraction=local I/M Program**  **None Fuel Formulation**  **Default Fuel Supply**  **Default Future runs modified for reformulated gas, RVP, etc. for summer**  **analyses Metereology Data**  **Local data obtained from NOAA National Climatic Data Center. Data consist of monthly high and low temperatures and daily**  **relative humidity for 2002. Ramp Fraction**  **Using the base year travel demand model for VHT fractions. Future fractions assumed constant** Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates J uly, 2014 **7** 

### Road Type Distribution **Use ODOT county summary VMT categorized by federal functional classes**  **Age Distribution Combination of local and default data.**  **Local data (2010) ODOT from motor vehicle registration Default data used for source types 41, 51, 54, 61, and 62**  **The same age distribution used for all analysis years Average Speed Distribution**  **Default Alternative Fuel Type**  **Default**Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates J uly, 2014 **8** 

### Temperature and Relative Humidity

**Temperatures used for the single season approach are representative of 12 months in 2002 based on NOAA data from the National Climate Data Center website. Data for**  **Port Columbus International Airport was used because it was the most complete compared to other airports in the non-attainment area. To get the correct format for**  **MOVES, the data was entered into a spreadsheet provided by EPA which was designed to convert Mobile6 data to MOVES. An average annual hourly temperature and relative**  **humidity distribution profile can be seen in Table 2.**

Table 2

– Temperature and Relative Humidity Data

**Hour Average** 

**Temperature Average**  **Relative Humidity 1**  **48.9 73.0**  

### 2 **47.8 75.0**  

### 3 **46.9 77.0**  

### 4 **46.2 80.0**  

### 5 **45.7 81.0**  

### 6 **45.1 81.0**  

### 7 **44.6 80.0**  

### 8 **45.0 77.0**  

### 9 **47.5 73.0**  

### 10 **51.5 67.0**  

### 11 **55.6 64.0**  

### 12 **59.1 61.0**  

### 13 **62.2 57.0**  

### 14 **63.9 56.0**  

### 15 **64.4 53.0**  

### 16 **64.6 53.0**  

### 17 **64.2 54.0**  

### 18 **63.0 55.0**  

### 19 **61.0 57.0**  

### 20 **58.4 63.0**  

### 21 **55.9 67.0**  

### 22 **53.6 70.0**  

### 23 **52.0 72.0**  

### 24 **50.4 75.0** 



### Ramp Fraction **Ramp fractions were derived using the base year travel demand model VHT fractions. Ramp fractions can be seen in Table 3. Base year fractions were assumed to apply to**  **future years.**

Table 3

– Ramp Fractions

**RoadTypeID Road Description**  **Ramp Fraction 2**  **Rural Restricted Access 0.02**  **4 Urban Restricted Access**  **0.13**Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates J uly, 2014 **9** 

### Source Type Population **Source type population is based on a combination of local and MOVES default data. Local data was provided by ODOT based on 2010 motor vehicle registration. Default**  **data is used for source types 41, 51, 54, 61, and 62. Future year growth rate is based on MPO model growth in cars which is an independent variable to the travel demand**  **model. Table 4 shows source type population for the analyzed counties in 2008.**

Table 4

– Source Type Population for year 2008 **Source Type**  **ID sourceTypeName**  **Franklin Delaware**  **Licking Fairfield**  **Madison & Knox**  **11 MotorCycle**  **55,222 6,868**  **8,999 2,444**  **3,565 21**  **Passenger Car 878,901**  **97,120 128,334**  **35,905 43,829**  **31 Passenger Truck**  **383,900 44,774**  **58,759 16,550**  **31,914 32**  **Light Commercial Truck 11,553**  **1,348 1,768**  **498 1,280**  **41 Intercity Bus**  **294 66**  **83 23**  **66 42**  **Transit Bus 79**  **18 22**  **6 35**  **43 School Bus**  **1,582 357**  **446 126**  **405 51**  **Refuse truck 228**  **39 49**  **13 37**  **52 Single Unit Short-haul Truck**  **205 35**  **44 12**  **1,553 53**  **Single Unit Long-haul Truck 264**  **44 57**  **15 198**  **54 Motor Home**  **1,102 184**  **235 65**  **181 61**  **Comb Short-haul Truck 3,144**  **653 905**  **154 780**  **62 Comb Long-haul Truck**  **3,616 750**  **1,040 178**  **897**



### Vehicle Age Distribution **Vehicle age distribution information was derived using Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicle registration data for year 2010. The data was given to OEPA who supplied a VIN**  **decoder that allowed ODOT to create correctly formatted MOVES inputs. MOVES default data is used for source types 41, 51, 54, 61, and 62. The registration data for**  **most populous four counties were obtained in the non-attainment area and combined to create a regional vehicle age distribution file, see Table 5. This data is applied to all six**  **counties in the region. The same age distribution will be used for all analysis years**Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates J uly, 2014 **10** 

### Table 5

– Vehicle Age Distribution **Year ID**  **Source Type ID**  **Age**

**ID Age**  **Fraction Source** 

**Type ID Age** 

**ID Age**  **Fraction Source** 

**Type ID Age** 

**ID Age**  **Fraction 2008**  **11 0**  **0.0017 21**  **8 0.0599**  **31 16**  **0.0300 2008**  **11 1**  **0.0228 21**  **9 0.0580**  **31 17**  **0.0256 2008**  **11 2**  **0.0552 21**  **10 0.0634**  **31 18**  **0.0157 2008**  **11 3**  **0.0765 21**  **11 0.0615**  **31 19**  **0.0118 2008**  **11 4**  **0.0864 21**  **12 0.0562**  **31 20**  **0.0084 2008**  **11 5**  **0.0820 21**  **13 0.0527**  **31 21**  **0.0077 2008**  **11 6**  **0.0664 21**  **14 0.0460**  **31 22**  **0.0062 2008**  **11 7**  **0.0839 21**  **15 0.0465**  **31 23**  **0.0048 2008**  **11 8**  **0.0584 21**  **16 0.0383**  **31 24**  **0.0031 2008**  **11 9**  **0.0540 21**  **17 0.0318**  **31 25**  **0.0024 2008**  **11 10**  **0.0442 21**  **18 0.0269**  **31 26**  **0.0015 2008**  **11 11**  **0.0333 21**  **19 0.0209**  **31 27**  **0.0009 2008**  **11 12**  **0.0260 21**  **20 0.0162**  **31 28**  **0.0005 2008**  **11 13**  **0.0204 21**  **21 0.0127**  **31 29**  **0.0003 2008**  **11 14**  **0.0195 21**  **22 0.0092**  **31 30**  **0.0037 2008**  **11 15**  **0.0188 21**  **23 0.0069**  **32 0**  **0.0059 2008**  **11 16**  **0.0153 21**  **24 0.0057**  **32 1**  **0.0452 2008**  **11 17**  **0.0128 21**  **25 0.0042**  **32 2**  **0.1089 2008**  **11 18**  **0.0091 21**  **26 0.0031**  **32 3**  **0.0740 2008**  **11 19**  **0.0085 21**  **27 0.0017**  **32 4**  **0.0699 2008**  **11 20**  **0.0078 21**  **28 0.0011**  **32 5**  **0.0388 2008**  **11 21**  **0.0078 21**  **29 0.0010**  **32 6**  **0.0331 2008**  **11 22**  **0.0074 21**  **30 0.0321**  **32 7**  **0.0376 2008**  **11 23**  **0.0106 31**  **0 0.0071**  **32 8**  **0.0370 2008**  **11 24**  **0.0156 31**  **1 0.0277**  **32 9**  **0.0441 2008**  **11 25**  **0.0144 31**  **2 0.0494**  **32 10**  **0.0557 2008**  **11 26**  **0.0126 31**  **3 0.0584**  **32 11**  **0.0557 2008**  **11 27**  **0.0163 31**  **4 0.0676**  **32 12**  **0.0472 2008**  **11 28**  **0.0237 31**  **5 0.0828**  **32 13**  **0.0456 2008**  **11 29**  **0.0163 31**  **6 0.0800**  **32 14**  **0.0385 2008**  **11 30**  **0.0723 31**  **7 0.0727**  **32 15**  **0.0609 2008**  **21 0**  **0.0075 31**  **8 0.0752**  **32 16**  **0.0476 2008**  **21 1**  **0.0279 31**  **9 0.0613**  **32 17**  **0.0340 2008**  **21 2**  **0.0396 31**  **10 0.0647**  **32 18**  **0.0273 2008**  **21 3**  **0.0489 31**  **11 0.0622**  **32 19**  **0.0155 2008**  **21 4**  **0.0508 31**  **12 0.0515**  **32 20**  **0.0156 2008**  **21 5**  **0.0537 31**  **13 0.0433**  **32 21**  **0.0156 2008**  **21 6**  **0.0561 31**  **14 0.0373**  **32 22**  **0.0118 2008**  **21 7**  **0.0595 31**  **15 0.0362**  **32 23**  **0.0095**Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates J uly, 2014 **11** 

### Year **ID Source**  **Type ID Age** 

**ID Age**  **Fraction Source** 

**Type ID Age** 

**ID Age**  **Fraction Source** 

**Type ID Age** 

**ID Age**  **Fraction 2008**  **32 24**  **0.0045 42**  **2 0.0592**  **43 11**  **0.0557 2008**  **32 25**  **0.0057 42**  **3 0.0592**  **43 12**  **0.0843 2008**  **32 26**  **0.0044 42**  **4 0.0592**  **43 13**  **0.0484 2008**  **32 27**  **0.0019 42**  **5 0.0395**  **43 14**  **0.0178 2008**  **32 28**  **0.0010 42**  **6 0.0724**  **43 15**  **0.0192 2008**  **32 29**  **0.0007 42**  **7 0.0461**  **43 16**  **0.0129 2008**  **32 30**  **0.0068 42**  **8 0.0592**  **43 17**  **0.0132 2008**  **41 0**  **0.0013 42**  **9 0.0855**  **43 18**  **0.0181 2008**  **41 1**  **0.0344 42**  **10 0.0592**  **43 19**  **0.0213 2008**  **41 2**  **0.0607 42**  **11 0.1316**  **43 20**  **0.0139 2008**  **41 3**  **0.0837 42**  **12 0.0395**  **43 21**  **0.0087 2008**  **41 4**  **0.1005 42**  **13 0.0329**  **43 22**  **0.0077 2008**  **41 5**  **0.0870 42**  **14 0.0263**  **43 23**  **0.0087 2008**  **41 6**  **0.0972 42**  **15 0.0395**  **43 24**  **0.0056 2008**  **41 7**  **0.0607 42**  **16 0.0461**  **43 25**  **0.0066 2008**  **41 8**  **0.0742 42**  **17 0.0132**  **43 26**  **0.0049 2008**  **41 9**  **0.0472 42**  **18 0.0197**  **43 27**  **0.0024 2008**  **41 10**  **0.0466 42**  **19 0.0197**  **43 28**  **0.0017 2008**  **41 11**  **0.0614 42**  **20 0.0000**  **43 29**  **0.0038 2008**  **41 12**  **0.0290 42**  **21 0.0132**  **43 30**  **0.0064 2008**  **41 13**  **0.0263 42**  **22 0.0066**  **51 0**  **0.0097 2008**  **41 14**  **0.0189 42**  **23 0.0132**  **51 1**  **0.0290 2008**  **41 15**  **0.0162 42**  **24 0.0000**  **51 2**  **0.0258 2008**  **41 16**  **0.0229 42**  **25 0.0329**  **51 3**  **0.0839 2008**  **41 17**  **0.0142 42**  **26 0.0000**  **51 4**  **0.0968 2008**  **41 18**  **0.0081 42**  **27 0.0129**  **51 5**  **0.0226 2008**  **41 19**  **0.0175 42**  **28 0.0000**  **51 6**  **0.0677 2008**  **41 20**  **0.0101 42**  **29 0.0000**  **51 7**  **0.0774 2008**  **41 21**  **0.0101 42**  **30 0.0000**  **51 8**  **0.0419 2008**  **41 22**  **0.0121 43**  **0 0.0561**  **51 9**  **0.0323 2008**  **41 23**  **0.0094 43**  **1 0.0411**  **51 10**  **0.0710 2008**  **41 24**  **0.0061 43**  **2 0.0491**  **51 11**  **0.0710 2008**  **41 25**  **0.0034 43**  **3 0.0655**  **51 12**  **0.0613 2008**  **41 26**  **0.0081 43**  **4 0.0564**  **51 13**  **0.0516 2008**  **41 27**  **0.0020 43**  **5 0.0516**  **51 14**  **0.0387 2008**  **41 28**  **0.0000 43**  **6 0.0627**  **51 15**  **0.0419 2008**  **41 29**  **0.0034 43**  **7 0.0537**  **51 16**  **0.0355 2008**  **41 30**  **0.0273 43**  **8 0.0666**  **51 17**  **0.0161 2008**  **42 0**  **0.0000 43**  **9 0.0603**  **51 18**  **0.0258 2008**  **42 1**  **0.0132 43**  **10 0.0756**  **51 19**  **0.0129**Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates J uly, 2014 **12** 

### Year **ID Source**  **Type ID Age** 

**ID Age**  **Fraction Source** 

**Type ID Age** 

**ID Age**  **Fraction Source** 

**Type ID Age** 

**ID Age**  **Fraction 2008**  **51 20**  **0.0000 52**  **29 0.0032**  **54 7**  **0.0450 2008**  **51 21**  **0.0032 52**  **30 0.0484**  **54 8**  **0.0417 2008**  **51 22**  **0.0065 53**  **0 0.0097**  **54 9**  **0.0414 2008**  **51 23**  **0.0032 53**  **1 0.0290**  **54 10**  **0.0524 2008**  **51 24**  **0.0032 53**  **2 0.0258**  **54 11**  **0.0482 2008**  **51 25**  **0.0065 53**  **3 0.0839**  **54 12**  **0.0409 2008**  **51 26**  **0.0032 53**  **4 0.0968**  **54 13**  **0.0334 2008**  **51 27**  **0.0000 53**  **5 0.0226**  **54 14**  **0.0356 2008**  **51 28**  **0.0097 53**  **6 0.0677**  **54 15**  **0.0315 2008**  **51 29**  **0.0032 53**  **7 0.0774**  **54 16**  **0.0285 2008**  **51 30**  **0.0484 53**  **8 0.0419**  **54 17**  **0.0254 2008**  **52 0**  **0.0097 53**  **9 0.0323**  **54 18**  **0.0197 2008**  **52 1**  **0.0290 53**  **10 0.0710**  **54 19**  **0.0177 2008**  **52 2**  **0.0258 53**  **11 0.0710**  **54 20**  **0.0180 2008**  **52 3**  **0.0839 53**  **12 0.0613**  **54 21**  **0.0263 2008**  **52 4**  **0.0968 53**  **13 0.0516**  **54 22**  **0.0243 2008**  **52 5**  **0.0226 53**  **14 0.0387**  **54 23**  **0.0230 2008**  **52 6**  **0.0677 53**  **15 0.0419**  **54 24**  **0.0166 2008**  **52 7**  **0.0774 53**  **16 0.0355**  **54 25**  **0.0193 2008**  **52 8**  **0.0419 53**  **17 0.0161**  **54 26**  **0.0208 2008**  **52 9**  **0.0323 53**  **18 0.0258**  **54 27**  **0.0130 2008**  **52 10**  **0.0710 53**  **19 0.0129**  **54 28**  **0.0089 2008**  **52 11**  **0.0710 53**  **20 0.0000**  **54 29**  **0.0074 2008**  **52 12**  **0.0613 53**  **21 0.0032**  **54 30**  **0.1404 2008**  **52 13**  **0.0516 53**  **22 0.0065**  **61 0**  **0.0021 2008**  **52 14**  **0.0387 53**  **23 0.0032**  **61 1**  **0.0135 2008**  **52 15**  **0.0419 53**  **24 0.0032**  **61 2**  **0.0306 2008**  **52 16**  **0.0355 53**  **25 0.0065**  **61 3**  **0.0385 2008**  **52 17**  **0.0161 53**  **26 0.0032**  **61 4**  **0.0509 2008**  **52 18**  **0.0258 53**  **27 0.0000**  **61 5**  **0.0527 2008**  **52 19**  **0.0129 53**  **28 0.0097**  **61 6**  **0.0590 2008**  **52 20**  **0.0000 53**  **29 0.0032**  **61 7**  **0.0584 2008**  **52 21**  **0.0032 53**  **30 0.0484**  **61 8**  **0.0571 2008**  **52 22**  **0.0065 54**  **0 0.0051**  **61 9**  **0.0551 2008**  **52 23**  **0.0032 54**  **1 0.0130**  **61 10**  **0.0628 2008**  **52 24**  **0.0032 54**  **2 0.0257**  **61 11**  **0.0608 2008**  **52 25**  **0.0065 54**  **3 0.0382**  **61 12**  **0.0501 2008**  **52 26**  **0.0032 54**  **4 0.0413**  **61 13**  **0.0542 2008**  **52 27**  **0.0000 54**  **5 0.0472**  **61 14**  **0.0390 2008**  **52 28**  **0.0097 54**  **6 0.0501**  **61 15**  **0.0435**Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates J uly, 2014 **13** 

### Year **ID Source**  **Type ID Age** 

**ID Age**  **Fraction Source** 

**Type ID Age** 

**ID Age**  **Fraction Source** 

**Type ID Age** 

**ID Age**  **Fraction 2008**  **61 16**  **0.0430 62**  **1 0.0485**  **62 17**  **0.0079 2008**  **61 17**  **0.0314 62**  **2 0.0193**  **62 18**  **0.0039 2008**  **61 18**  **0.0269 62**  **3 0.1651**  **62 19**  **0.0026 2008**  **61 19**  **0.0228 62**  **4 0.0912**  **62 20**  **0.0032 2008**  **61 20**  **0.0192 62**  **5 0.1263**  **62 21**  **0.0034 2008**  **61 21**  **0.0217 62**  **6 0.0858**  **62 22**  **0.0027 2008**  **61 22**  **0.0203 62**  **7 0.0529**  **62 23**  **0.0013 2008**  **61 23**  **0.0144 62**  **8 0.0286**  **62 24**  **0.0008 2008**  **61 24**  **0.0135 62**  **9 0.0663**  **62 25**  **0.0008 2008**  **61 25**  **0.0099 62**  **10 0.1102**  **62 26**  **0.0006 2008**  **61 26**  **0.0069 62**  **11 0.0600**  **62 27**  **0.0002 2008**  **61 27**  **0.0036 62**  **12 0.0353**  **62 28**  **0.0001 2008**  **61 28**  **0.0032 62**  **13 0.0186**  **62 29**  **0.0003 2008**  **61 29**  **0.0028 62**  **14 0.0196**  **62 30**  **0.0001 2008**  **61 30**  **0.0321 62**  **15 0.0208**  **2008 62**  **0 0.0076**  **62 16**  **0.0160 2008** Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates J uly, 2014 **14** 

### Road Type Distribution

**Road type distribution is based on the 2008 ODOT, county summary, HPMS VMT data categorized by federal functional class obtained for the most populous four counties,**  **and is applied to the region, similar to development of vehicle age distribution data used for the region. Road type distribution can be seen in Table 6.** 

Table 6

– Road Type Distribution **Source Type ID**  **Road**

**Type ID Road Type VMT** 

**Fraction Source Type**  **ID Road** 

**Type ID Road Type VMT** 

**Fraction**

**11 1**  **0 43**  **4 0.37**  **11 2**  **0.05 43**  **5 0.46**  **11 3**  **0.12 51**  **1 0**  **11 4**  **0.37 51**  **2 0.05**  **11 5**  **0.46 51**  **3 0.12**  **21 1**  **0 51**  **4 0.37**  **21 2**  **0.05 51**  **5 0.46**  **21 3**  **0.12 52**  **1 0**  **21 4**  **0.37 52**  **2 0.05**  **21 5**  **0.46 52**  **3 0.12**  **31 1**  **0 52**  **4 0.37**  **31 2**  **0.05 52**  **5 0.46**  **31 3**  **0.12 53**  **1 0**  **31 4**  **0.37 53**  **2 0.05**  **31 5**  **0.46 53**  **3 0.12**  **32 1**  **0 53**  **4 0.37**  **32 2**  **0.05 53**  **5 0.46**  **32 3**  **0.12 54**  **1 0**  **32 4**  **0.37 54**  **2 0.05**  **32 5**  **0.46 54**  **3 0.12**  **41 1**  **0 54**  **4 0.37**  **41 2**  **0.05 54**  **5 0.46**  **41 3**  **0.12 61**  **1 0**  **41 4**  **0.37 61**  **2 0.05**  **41 5**  **0.46 61**  **3 0.12**  **42 1**  **0 61**  **4 0.37**  **42 2**  **0.05 61**  **5 0.46**  **42 3**  **0.12 62**  **1 0**  **42 4**  **0.37 62**  **2 0.05**  **42 5**  **0.46 62**  **3 0.12**  **43 1**  **0 62**  **4 0.37**  **43 2**  **0.05 62**  **5 0.46**  **43 3**  **0.12**Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates J uly, 2014 **15** 

### Vehicle Type VMT and VMT Fractions

**The first component of the VMT inputs is the Yearly HPMS VMT, but the travel demand** model was used instead of ODOT’s HMPS data since it was felt that the model would better predict future year VMT. ODOT’s CMS post **-processor was run for each year to generate congestion reports, which includes total daily VMT. The vehicle type**  percentages of the total VMT were based on ODOT’s weigh **-in-motion (WIM) data. Since there are not enough WIM stations for lower class facilities in the non-attainment**  **area, a statewide average of all ODOT WIM data collectors was used. Daily VMT was then converted to yearly. Yearly HPMS VMT for 2008 can be seen in Table 7. The**  **same method was used to generate all other analysis years**

Table 7

– Yearly HPMS VMT for 2008 **HPMS VtypeID**  **Year ID HPMS BaseYear VMT**  **10 2008**  **65,724,689** 

### 20 **2008 11,721,479,841**  

### 30 **2008 3,616,636,813**  

### 40 **2008 36,966,843**  

### 50 **2008 273,279,798**  

### 60 **2008 648,816,441** 



### Monthly and daily VMT fractions used MOVES default data. The hourly VMT fractions **were derived from ODOT WIM data. Hourly VMT fractions vary for each of the five MOVES road types but do not change for each of the 16 MOVES source types. A**  **representative sample of the hour VMT fraction input file can be seen in Table 8, the entire file is too large to include in this document.** 

Table 8

– Hourly VMT Fractions **Source TypeID**  **Road**

**TypeID DayID**  **HourID Hour**  **VMTFraction 11**  **1 2**  **1 0.0089**  **11 1**  **2 2**  **0.00564 11**  **1 2**  **3 0.00424**  **11 1**  **2 4**  **0.00427 11**  **1 2**  **5 0.00695**  **11 1**  **2 6**  **0.01798 11**  **1 2**  **7 0.03806**  **11 1**  **2 8**  **0.057 11**  **1 2**  **9 0.05773**  **11 1**  **2 10**  **0.05538**Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates J uly, 2014 **16** 

### Source **TypeID Road** 

**TypeID DayID**  **HourID Hour**  **VMTFraction 11**  **1 2**  **11 0.05554**  **11 1**  **2 12**  **0.05558 11**  **1 2**  **13 0.05584**  **11 1**  **2 14**  **0.06051 11**  **1 2**  **15 0.06765**  **11 1**  **2 16**  **0.07755 11**  **1 2**  **17 0.08428**  **11 1**  **2 18**  **0.0797 11**  **1 2**  **19 0.06012**  **11 1**  **2 20**  **0.04522 11**  **1 2**  **21 0.03646**  **11 1**  **2 22**  **0.02912 11**  **1 2**  **23 0.02142**  **11 1**  **2 24**  **0.01486**

**11 2**  **2 1**  **0.0089 11**  **2 2**  **2 0.00564**  **11 2**  **2 3**  **0.00424 11**  **2 2**  **4 0.00427**  **11 2**  **2 5**  **0.00695 11**  **2 2**  **6 0.01798**  **11 2**  **2 7**  **0.03806 11**  **2 2**  **8 0.057**  **11 2**  **2 9**  **0.05773 11**  **2 2**  **10 0.05538**  **11 2**  **2 11**  **0.05554 11**  **2 2**  **12 0.05558**  **11 2**  **2 13**  **0.05584 11**  **2 2**  **14 0.06051**  **11 2**  **2 15**  **0.06765 11**  **2 2**  **16 0.07755**  **11 2**  **2 17**  **0.08428 11**  **2 2**  **18 0.0797**  **11 2**  **2 19**  **0.06012 11**  **2 2**  **20 0.04522**  **11 2**  **2 21**  **0.03646 11**  **2 2**  **22 0.02912**  **11 2**  **2 23**  **0.02142 11**  **2 2**  **24 0.01486** Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates J uly, 2014 **17** 

### Source **TypeID Road** 

**TypeID DayID**  **HourID Hour**  **VMTFraction 11**  **3 2**  **1 0.00655**  **11 3**  **2 2**  **0.0037 11**  **3 2**  **3 0.00304**  **11 3**  **2 4**  **0.00363 11**  **3 2**  **5 0.00792**  **11 3**  **2 6**  **0.02343 11**  **3 2**  **7 0.04899**  **11 3**  **2 8**  **0.06319 11**  **3 2**  **9 0.05402**  **11 3**  **2 10**  **0.05121 11**  **3 2**  **11 0.0528**  **11 3**  **2 12**  **0.05608 11**  **3 2**  **13 0.05814**  **11 3**  **2 14**  **0.05875 11**  **3 2**  **15 0.06676**  **11 3**  **2 16**  **0.07812 11**  **3 2**  **17 0.08469**  **11 3**  **2 18**  **0.08152 11**  **3 2**  **19 0.05852**  **11 3**  **2 20**  **0.04343 11**  **3 2**  **21 0.03606**  **11 3**  **2 22**  **0.02829 11**  **3 2**  **23 0.01883**  **11 3**  **2 24**  **0.01233**

**11 4**  **2 1**  **0.00752 11**  **4 2**  **2 0.0044**  **11 4**  **2 3**  **0.00354 11**  **4 2**  **4 0.00374**  **11 4**  **2 5**  **0.00705 11**  **4 2**  **6 0.02123**  **11 4**  **2 7**  **0.054 11**  **4 2**  **8 0.0768**  **11 4**  **2 9**  **0.06545 11**  **4 2**  **10 0.05114**  **11 4**  **2 11**  **0.04692 11**  **4 2**  **12 0.04916**  **11 4**  **2 13**  **0.05112 11**  **4 2**  **14 0.0534**  **11 4**  **2 15**  **0.06105**Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates J uly, 2014 **18** 

### Source **TypeID Road** 

**TypeID DayID**  **HourID Hour**  **VMTFraction 11**  **4 2**  **16 0.07421**  **11 4**  **2 17**  **0.08321 11**  **4 2**  **18 0.08385**  **11 4**  **2 19**  **0.06062 11**  **4 2**  **20 0.04229**  **11 4**  **2 21**  **0.03442 11**  **4 2**  **22 0.0292**  **11 4**  **2 23**  **0.02137 11**  **4 2**  **24 0.01431** 

**11 5**  **2 1**  **0.00678 11**  **5 2**  **2 0.00378**  **11 5**  **2 3**  **0.00295 11**  **5 2**  **4 0.0029**  **11 5**  **2 5**  **0.00498 11**  **5 2**  **6 0.01422**  **11 5**  **2 7**  **0.03449 11**  **5 2**  **8 0.05728**  **11 5**  **2 9**  **0.05435 11**  **5 2**  **10 0.04991**  **11 5**  **2 11**  **0.05261 11**  **5 2**  **12 0.06098**  **11 5**  **2 13**  **0.06457 11**  **5 2**  **14 0.06387**  **11 5**  **2 15**  **0.06812 11**  **5 2**  **16 0.07672**  **11 5**  **2 17**  **0.08274 11**  **5 2**  **18 0.08284**  **11 5**  **2 19**  **0.06344 11**  **5 2**  **20 0.04866**  **11 5**  **2 21**  **0.0407 11**  **5 2**  **22 0.03083**  **11 5**  **2 23**  **0.01966 11**  **5 2**  **24 0.01262** Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates J uly, 2014 **19** 

### Output Emission Factors

**Table 9 shows the first record in a MOVES sample output (rate per distance) emission file for year 2008. For any given month, day of week, hour of the day, pollutant, and**  **process; the rate per distance varies by road type, and speed bin. Rates per distance emissions are applied to link and intrazonal VMT.** 

Table 9

– Sample Emission File (Rate per Distance) for year 2008 **Heading: MOVESScenarioID**  **MOVESRunID yearID**  **monthID dayID**  **hourID Record:**  **OhioCustomDomain 6**  **2008 7**  **5 1**  **Heading: linkID**  **pollutantID processID**  **sourceTypeID SCC**  **fuelTypeID Record:**  

### 990250201 **3 0**  **1 0**  **Heading: modelYearID**  **roadTypeID avgSpeedBinID**  **temperature relHumidity**  **ratePerDistance Record:**  **0 2**  **1** 

### 48.9333 **73 12.9489** 



### Table 10 shows the first record in a MOVES sample output (rate per vehicle) emission **file for year 2008. The rate per vehicle varies for any combinations of month, day of week, hour of the day, pollutant, and process. Rates per vehicle emissions are applied**  **to the vehicle source type population.**

Table 10

–

Sample Emission File (Rate per Vehicle) for year 2008 **Heading: MOVESScenarioID**  **MOVESRunID yearID**  **monthID dayID**  **Record: OhioCustomDomain**  **6 2008**  **7 5**  **Heading: hourID**  **zoneID pollutantID**  **processID sourceTypeID**  **Record: 1**  

### 990250 **3 0**  **2 Heading:**  **SCC fuelTypeID**  **modelYearID temperature**  **ratePerVehicle Record:**  **0 0**  

### 48.9333 **0.054967**



### Air Quality Consultation Process

**The 1990 Clean Air Act amendments required identification of the consultation procedures that Ohio's air quality and transportation agencies will follow in the**  **conformity process. To fulfill this requirement, the Ohio EPA has adopted Ohio Administrative Code 3745-101-04 to define the interagency consultation procedures**  **used on air quality issues. These rules define a "straw man" process, whereby the lead agencies in the conformity process assume responsibility for preparing and distributing**  **draft documents, with supporting information, and ensuring that each affected party involved in the conformity process is included in the consultation process. In addition, a**  **Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between MORPC, LCATS, ODOT and Ohio EPA has been signed to clarify OAC 3745-101-04 for the Columbus maintenance area.**  **As a result of SAFETEA-LU Ohio EPA led the process to update MOU. This process is concluding with signatures from all parties obtained in February/March 2008.** Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates J uly, 2014 **20** 

### The Columbus non-attainment area SIP development process employed the **consultation procedures embodied in the rules. The procedures used in the current air quality analysis are comparable to the previous on road emission inventory and**  **forecasting process. In addition, MORPC has had various telephone conversations and e-mail correspondence with Ohio EPA, ODOT and FHWA. Ohio EPA has also**  **discussed various issues with U.S. EPA.**

2.4.1 Vehicle Age Distribution

**OEPA provided vehicle age distribution information that was derived using USEPAs VIN decoder and Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicle registration data. The registration data for**  **Central Ohio area, Vehicle age distribution used to represent the MORPC/LCATS area is listed in Table 5.**  2.4.2 Temperatures

**The low and high input temperatures used for MORPC area was given by OEPA. ODOT developed an average daily temperature distribution profile to derive the hourly**  **temperature values. Temperature data input used is shown in table 2.** 2.5 Computations Methodology

2.5.1 Areas with Regional Model

Post Processing

**Custom programs developed by ODOT in conjunction with MPO models, were used in computing total emissions. The process uses data on daily and directional traffic**  **distributions as well as more up to date volume/delay functions from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). This process, described below, uses rewritten code able to**  **handle the newer model network formats and MOVES generated emission factors.**

**The first step in the process involves running postcms10.exe to calculate hourly link volumes based on the percentage of the daily volume (travel demand model output)**  determined by a link’s facility and area type. Link speeds from the travel demand model **are not used in the analysis. The speeds are estimated as a post-process to the model based on HCM m**  ethods using a link’s volume **-to-capacity ratio and link group code. The daily to hourly volume conversion percentages and speed tables can be seen in**  **Appendix A, model script.**

**The second step (movesnet.exe) uses a combination of the MOVES emission factors and the hourly link volumes that are output of the postcms10.exe program. The hourly**  **volumes are multiplied by the MOVES emission factor for the corresponding hour of day, speed bin, and roadtype to calculate emissions for every network link for each** Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates J uly, 2014 **21** 

### hour. The final link on road vehicle emissions for the area is the sum of all individual **link-hour emissions.**

**The third step, (movesveh.exe), calculates vehicle-based emissions for each source type for each hour of the day. The vehicle source type is based on a combination of**  **local and default data. The final vehicle emissions for each county are the sum of all individual hourly emissions for all vehicle types.** 

**Intrazonal trips do not get loaded onto the network, so the fourth step in the process requires a separate method to account for those trips that use local roads to travel**  **within a zone. The intracalc2.exe program uses intrazonal trips to estimate VMT using the area in square miles and intrazonal trips of each zone. The zone is assumed**  **circular and the radius of the circle is used as the average trip length for these intrazonal trips. Intrazonal emissions are then calculated by combining MOVES**  **generated emissions with estimated intrazonal VMT. The emission rates are the same as those used to calculated link based emissions.** 

**The final step is to summarize link, vehicle, and intrazonal emissions for each county, pollutant, and analyzed year, and to multiply annual average daily emissions by 365 to**  **produce an annual estimate. Daily summary emissions for each pollutant, county, and scenario year in the Central Ohio Region can be found in Appendix B through G. A**  **summary of these emissions are tabulated in Sections 3.1.1 and 3.1.2** 2.5.2 Areas without Regional Model

**The travel demand forecasting model discussed in the preceding sections does not cover the entire non-attainment area. Therefore, a standard process based on HPMS**  **VMT was employed for the rest of the area which includes portions of Fairfield County, Madison County, and Knox County. This process first requires estimating the**  **proportion of county VMT covered by the model and not covered by the model. This was accomplished using a GIS procedure, whereby, the proportion of the number of**  **vehicles from census data, inside and outside of the model boundary, was calculated. This information was then combined with countywide average volumes by functional**  **class to obtain the proportion of VMT inside and outside of the model. This computation yields 47% of the Fairfield county VMT, being inside the model area. Thus 53% of the**  **HPMS VMT is used as the basis of the off-model computation for Fairfield County. For Madison County 71% HPMS VMT is used as the basis of the off-model computation of**  **emissions. HPMS VMT data is used for all of Knox County.**

**VMT by functional classification obtained for outside regional model area, also provides speed data based on the type of facility. MOVES generated factors of rate per distance**  **as well as rate per vehicle were used to generate emissions for VOC, and NOx. A summary of these emissions are tabulated in Sections 3.1.2 and 3.1.3** Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates J uly, 2014 **22** 

## 3.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS

**Emission estimates summary of results is presented in the next sections.**

3.1.1 Areas within The Regional Travel Demand Model Table 11: Emission Estimations for On-Road Mobile Sources - Franklin County 

### Franklin County **2008** 

### VMT (miles/day) **33,674,281** 

### VOC (tons/day) **94.250** 

### NOx (tons/day) **168.462**

Table 12: Emission Estimations for On-Road Mobile Sou rces - Delaware County 

### Delaware County **2008** 

### VMT (miles/day) **5,163,945** 

### VOC (tons/day) **8.742** 

### NOx (tons/day) **18.995**

Table 13: Emission Estimations for On-Road Mobile Sources - Licking County 

### Licking County **2008** 

### VMT (miles/day) **5,269,914** 

### VOC (tons/day) **10.034** 

### NOx (tons/day) **20.839**

3.1.2 Areas partially within The Regional Travel Demand Model **Counties that are partially within regional travel demand model are Fairfield county, and Madison county.**  **Tables 14a, and 14b, summarize emissions estimates for Fairfield county, for the areas within and outside travel demand model area, respectively. Results presented in Table 14a is for the**  **area covered by the travel demand model. Table 14b is for the area not covered by the travel demand model. These are derived by using 53% of the total county HPMS based VMT as**  **described in section 2.5.2. Table 14c presents the emissions for the entire Fairfield county, which is simply sum of emissions from Tables 14a, and 14b.**  Table 14a: Emission Estimations for Fairfield County within the Travel Demand Model Area Fairfield County **2008** 

### VMT (miles/day) **1,762,320** 

### VOC (tons/day) **2.711** 

### NOx (tons/day) **6.126**Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates J uly, 2014 **23** 

### Table 14b: Emission Estimations for Fairfield County outside of the Travel Demand Model Area- using HPMS data Fairfield County **2008** 

### VMT (miles/day) **1,674,173** 

### VOC (tons/day) **2.411** 

### NOx (tons/day) **5.393**

Table 14c: Emission Estimations for Fairfield County sum of emissions from both the Travel Demand Model area as well as the HPMS area

**Tables 15a, and 15b, summarize emissions estimates for Madison county, for the areas within and outside travel demand area, respectively. Results presented in Table 15a is for the area**  **covered by the travel demand model. Table 15b is for the area not covered by the travel demand model. These are derived by using 71% of the Madison county HPMS based VMT as**  **described in section 2.5.2. Table 15c presents the emissions for the entire Madison county, which is simply sum of emissions from Tables 15a, and 15b.**  Table 15a: Emission Estimations for Madison County within the Travel Demand Model Area

Table 15b: Emission Estimations for Madison County outside of the Travel Demand Model Area - using HPMS data Fairfield County **2008** 

### VMT (miles/day) **3,436,493** 

### VOC (tons/day) **5.122** 

### NOx (tons/day) **11.519**

Madison County **2008** 

### VMT (miles/day) **902,205** 

### VOC (tons/day) **1.319** 

### NOx (tons/day) **3.056**

Madison County **2008** 

### VMT (miles/day) **1,521,185** 

### VOC (tons/day) **2.191** 

### NOx (tons/day) **4.900**Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates J uly, 2014 **24** 

### Table 15c: Emission Estimations for Madison County sum of emissions from both the Travel Demand Model area as well as the HPMS area

3.1.3 Area outside Regional Travel Demand Model **Tables 16, summarizes emissions estimates for Knox county, and the results presented in this Table used methodology based on HPMS data.** 

Table 16: Emission Estimations for Knox County

– using only HPMS

3.1.4 Total Emissions for the Columbus/Central Ohio area **Table 17, summarizes emissions estimates for the entire six county area. These emissions presented here is simply sum of all emissions in six counties summarized in Tables 11 through**  **16.**

Table 17: Emission Estimations for On-Road Mobile Sources for Columbus/Central Ohio

Madison County **2008** 

### VMT (miles/day) **2,423,389** 

### VOC (tons/day) **3.510** 

### NOx (tons/day) **7.956**

Knox County **2008** 

### VMT (miles/day) **1,221,494** 

### VOC (tons/day) **1.759** 

### NOx (tons/day) **3.935**

Central Ohio Area **2008** 

### VMT (miles/day) **51,189,516** 

### VOC (tons/day) **123.416** 

### NOx (tons/day) **231.706**Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates J uly, 2014 **25** 

### 3.2 Emissions Summary for the Columbus/Central Ohio Area **Tables 18 and 19, summarize VOC and NOx emissions estimates respectively for the analysis years. The summary presented in the following tables is from the aforementioned in Tables 11**  **through 16. In addition, these emissions are also tabulated based on RoadTypeID, as follows**  **RoadTypeID # RoadTypeID - Description**  1 **Off-Network** - all locations where the predominant activity is vehicle starts,

parking and idling (parking lots, truck stops, rest areas, freight or bus terminals) 2 **Rural Restricted Access** - rural highways that can only be accessed by an onramp 3 **Rural Unrestricted Access** - all other rural roads (arterials, connectors, and

local streets) 4 **Urban Restricted Access** - urban highways that can only be accessed by an

on-ramp 5 **Urban Unrestricted Access** - all other urban roads (arterials, connectors, and

local streets)

Table 18: VOC Emission Inventory Summary - Year 2008, (tons/day) RoadTypeID # VOC 2008 1 2 3 4 5 Franklin **94.25 59.444**  **1.093 4.750**  **9.453 19.510**  Delaware **8.742 5.514**  **0.101 0.441**  **0.877 1.810**  Licking **10.034 6.329**  **0.116 0.506**  **1.006 2.077**  Fairfield **5.122 3.230**  **0.059 0.258**  **0.514 1.060**  Madison **3.51 2.214**  **0.041 0.177**  **0.352 0.727**  Knox **1.759 1.109**  **0.020 0.089**  **0.176 0.364**  Total 123.416 **77.840 1.432**  **6.220 12.379**  **25.547**

Table 19: NOx Emission Inventory Summary - Year 2008, (tons/per day)

**Total** RoadTypeID # NOx 2008 1 2 3 4 5 Franklin **168.462 31.472**  **5.620 16.528**  **47.262 67.580**  Delaware **18.995 3.549**  **0.634 1.864**  **5.329 7.620**  Licking **20.839 3.893**  **0.695 2.045**  **5.846 8.360**  Fairfield **11.519 2.152**  **0.384 1.130**  **3.232 4.621**  Madison **7.956 1.486**  **0.265 0.781**  **2.232 3.192**  Knox **3.935 0.735**  **0.131 0.386**  **1.104 1.579**  Total 231.706 **43.287 7.730**  **22.733 65.005**  **92.951**Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates J uly, 2014 **26** 

## APPENDIX

· **Appendix A**

– **Model Script for computing emissions**

· **Appendix B**

– **MORPC Travel Demand Model Emission Run Report for 2008**

· **Appendix C**

– **MORPC HPMS VMT and Emissions**Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesJuly, 2014**27**Appendix A–Model Script, Figures illustrating Data**CUBE VOYAGER PROGRAM SCRIPT FOR COMPUTING VOC & NOx EMISSIONS**;[CMS (AQ), Produce Viper Network Output];;<<Process Template>>;;;Input Network File: {cm3neti,filename,"Input Network FileName",x,"N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\2014_04\model\AQ\Network\AQ_asgn_2008.net","Network File (*.net)|*.net"};Output Network File: {cm3neto,filename,"Output Network FileName",x,"N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\2014_04\model\AQ\Network\fra_out\AQ_2008out.net","Network File(*.net)|*.net"};Output CSV Summary File: {cm3sumo,filename,"Output CSV SummaryFile",x,"N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\2014_04\model\AQ\Network\fra_out\fra2008.csv","Report File(*.csv;*.txt)|*.csv;*.txt"};Output TXT Report File: {cm3rpto,filename,"Output TXT ReportFile",x,"N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\2014_04\model\AQ\Network\fra_out\fra2008.rpt","Report File(*.rpt;*.txt)|*.rpt;*.txt"};Output CSV Hourly File: {cm3hro,filename,"Output CSV Hourly File (Needed for benefits calc but verybig)",x,"NONE","Report File (*.csv;*.txt)|*.csv;*.txt"};Note: {cm3junkname,note,"Optional Air Quality Files, Leave Blank When Not Doing Air Quality Calculations"};AQ Run Type: {cm3aqtype,combolist,"AQ Run Type","MOVES","NONE","MOBILE"};AQ Comment Line: {cm3aqcom,editbox,"Optional AQ Report Comment",T,"Ozone Analysis with MOVES - MORPC"};Input Network Emissions Factors: {cm3effile,filename,"Input Network (per distance)EmissionsFactors",x,"N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\2014_04\model\factors\2008MORPC_ozone_3source_rpd.csv","Emissions File(*.fac;*.csv)|*.fac;*.csv"};Input Vehicle (MOV) or Intrazonal (MOB) Emissions Factors: {cm3ieffile,filename,"Input Vehicle (MOV) orIntrazonal (MOB) EmissionsFactors",x,"N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\2014_04\model\factors\2008MORPC_ozone_3source_rpv.csv","Emissions File(*.crd; *.csv)|*.crd; *.csv"};Input area file: {cm3afile,filename,"Input AreaFile",x,"N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\2014_04\model\AQ\area_taz\TAZ_areain.txt","Text File (*.txt; *.prn)|*.txt;*.prn"};Input Intrazonal Trips File: {cm3ifile,filename,"Input Intrazonal Trips (Matrix must be OMS format else usetext)",x,"N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\2014_04\model\AQ\intra_z\county\fra08.txt","Matrix or Text File (*.txt;*.prn; *.mat; *.trp)|*.txt; *.prn; *.mat; *.trp"};Intrazonal File Type: {cm3iztype,combolist,"Intrazonal File Type","TEXT","NONE","OMSTABLE"};Input vehicle file: {cm3vfile,filename,"Input Vehicle File (MovesOnly)",x,"N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\2014_04\model\factors\Source_Type_Pop_2008_MORPC_on-Model.csv","Text File(*.csv)|*.csv"};Space: {cm3space,note,"Parameters"}Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesJuly, 2014**28**;Truck PCE: {cm3tpce,editbox,"Truck PCE",N,"2.0"};Capacity Field: {cm3capf,comboedit,"Capacity Field","CAP24","CAP1","CAP2","CAP3","CAP4"};Hourly/Model Capacity Factor: {cm3kfact,editbox,"Hourly/Model(usually daily) Capacity Factor",N,"0.10"};AQ Season Factor: {cm3aqfact,comboedit,"AQ Season Factor (Ozone Only)","1.08","1.00"};Set Priority Code from ADMCLASS?:{cm3pri,combolist,"Set Priority Code from ADMCLASS? (CMSCOST canuse)","NO","SW","OMS"};Run Mode: {cm3rmode,combolist,"Run Mode (usually use Normal forAQ)","NORMAL","4PERIOD_OMS","4PERIOD_SW","4PERIOD_MARKETSEGMENTS_SW"};Note: {cm3junkname2,note,"Normal Mode Inputs (if you specify another mode the fields are predetermined)"};Volume Field: {cm3volf,comboedit,"Volume Field", "VOL24_TOT","V_1", "LOADEDVOL","WINTERVOL","SUMMERVOL"};Truck Volume Field: {cm3trkf,comboedit,"Truck Volume Field (leave to NONE for AQ unless EFs generated bysource)", "NONE","VOL24_TRK","VOL24_TRKHV","V2_1"};;<<End Parameters>>;;*if exist tempcms.txt DEL tempcms.txt*if exist summary.rpt DEL summary.rpt*if exist hourly.rpt DEL hourly.rpt*if exist cmstext.rpt DEL cmstext.rptCOPY FILE=county.datADA 1 4ALL 2 3ASD 3 4ATB 4 4ATH 5 4AUG 6 4BEL 7 3BRO 8 4BUT 9 2CAR10 4CHP11 4CLA12 3CLE13 2CLI14 4COL15 4COS16 4CRA17 4CUY18 1DAR19 4DEF20 4DEL21 2ERI22 3FAI23 4Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesJuly, 2014**29**FAY24 4FRA25 1FUL26 4GAL27 4GEA28 2GRE29 2GUE30 4HAM31 1HAN32 4HAR33 4HAS34 4HEN35 4HIG36 4HOC37 4HOL38 4HUR39 4JAC40 4JEF41 3KNO42 4LAK43 2LAW44 3LIC45 3LOG46 4LOR47 2LUC48 2MAD49 4MAH50 2MAR51 4MED52 2MEG53 4MER54 4MIA55 2MOE56 4MOT57 2MRG58 4MRW59 4MUS60 4NOB61 4OTT62 4PAU63 4PER64 4Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesJuly, 2014**30**PIC65 4PIK66 4POR67 2PRE68 4PUT69 4RIC70 3ROS71 4SAN72 4SCI73 4SEN74 4SHE75 4STA76 2SUM77 2TRU78 2TUS79 4UNI80 4VAN81 4VIN82 4WAR83 2WAS84 3WAY85 4WIL86 4WOO87 2WYA88 4ENDCOPYCOPY FILE=dailya.datHOUR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1112 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23PCTADTURB FWY 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.9 2.2 5.2 7.3 6.4 5.2 4.9 5.15.3 5.5 6.1 7.2 8.0 7.9 5.8 4.2 3.4 2.9 2.2 1.5URB ART 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.5 3.5 5.7 5.5 5.1 5.3 6.26.5 6.4 6.8 7.6 8.2 8.1 6.2 4.8 4.0 3.0 1.9 1.3RUR FWY 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.3 2.2 3.7 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.6 5.65.7 6.0 6.5 7.1 7.5 7.0 5.6 4.5 3.8 3.2 2.5 2.0RUR ART 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.0 2.4 4.8 6.2 5.5 5.3 5.5 5.86.0 6.0 6.7 7.6 8.1 7.7 5.6 4.2 3.5 2.8 1.9 1.3PCTADT TRKURB FWY 2.1 1.9 1.8 2.0 2.4 3.0 3.9 4.6 5.3 6.0 6.3 6.46.4 6.4 6.3 5.8 5.2 4.6 4.1 3.7 3.4 3.1 2.8 2.4Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesJuly, 2014**31**URB ART 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.3 3.9 5.9 6.9 6.7 7.1 7.67.4 7.2 7.4 7.2 6.0 5.0 3.7 2.8 2.3 1.9 1.5 1.3RUR FWY 2.6 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.6 3.1 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.1 5.6 5.85.8 5.8 5.8 5.6 5.3 4.9 4.6 4.3 4.0 3.8 3.5 3.1RUR ART 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.6 2.2 3.0 4.2 5.3 6.1 6.7 7.0 7.17.0 6.9 6.8 6.3 5.5 4.6 3.8 3.1 2.6 2.3 2.1 1.7PCTDIRURB FWY 38 40 40 46 56 64 70 70 68 62 58 5252 52 50 46 38 38 46 52 46 42 42 40URB ART 44 46 44 48 54 62 66 68 64 56 54 5250 50 50 46 40 38 46 52 48 46 46 46RUR FWY 44 46 48 54 60 68 68 64 58 54 52 5050 52 52 48 42 40 44 48 48 44 46 44RUR ART 40 42 44 48 58 66 72 68 60 56 54 5050 50 50 46 40 38 46 50 46 44 44 44LOS E VC 0 0.625 1.25 1.875 2.5 3.125 3.75 4.375 5 5.625 6.25 6.8757.5 8.125 8.75 9.375 10 10.625 11.25 11.875 12.5 13.125 13.75 14.375SPEEDVCcurve1 75 75 75 75 75 75 74.9 74.8 74.6 74.2 73.5 72.370.5 67.8 64.2 59.5 54 47.7 41.2 34.9 28.9 23.7 19.2 15.5curve2 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 69.9 69.8 69.6 69.2 68.467.1 65.1 62.2 58.2 53 47 40.5 33.9 27.7 22.2 17.6 13.8curve3 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 64.9 64.8 64.463.8 62.6 60.5 57 52 45.4 37.8 29.9 22.7 16.7 12.1 8.6curve4 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 59.9 59.8 59.659.1 58.2 56.7 54.3 50.8 46.1 40.3 33.8 27.3 21.3 16.2 12.2curve5 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 54.954.7 54.3 53.6 52.3 50 46.5 41.5 35.3 28.5 21.9 16.1 11.5curve6 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 59.9 59.8 59.7 59.459.1 58.5 57.7 56.5 55 53.1 50.7 47.9 44.7 41.1 37.3 33.4curve7 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 54.9 54.9 54.7 54.554.2 53.8 53.1 52.2 50.9 49.3 47.3 44.9 42.1 39 35.7 32.2curve8 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.9 49.8 49.649.4 49 48.5 47.7 46.7 45.4 43.8 41.8 39.5 36.8 33.9 30.9curve9 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 44.9 44.8 44.744.4 44.1 43.6 43 42.1 40.9 39.4 37.6 35.5 33.1 30.5 27.8curve10 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.8 49.7 49.4 49 48.4 47.5 46.545.1 43.5 41.7 39.6 37.3 34.9 32.4 29.8 27.3 24.9 22.6 20.4curve11 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.7 49.4 48.9 48 46.7 44.942.5 39.6 36.2 32.6 28.7 25 21.4 18.2 15.3 12.9 10.8 9Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesJuly, 2014**32**curve12 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.8 49.6 49.1 48.2 46.8 44.541.4 37.5 32.9 28 23.1 18.7 14.9 11.8 9.2 7.2 5.7 4.5curve13 40 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.8 39.5 39.2 38.6 37.836.7 35.3 33.5 31.4 29 26.4 23.7 21.1 18.5 16.1 13.9 12curve14 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.8 39.6 39.1 38.5 37.5 36.134.3 32.1 29.4 26.5 23.5 20.5 17.7 15.1 12.8 10.7 9 7.6curve15 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.7 39.4 38.8 37.9 36.5 34.732.3 29.5 26.4 23.2 20 17 14.3 11.9 9.9 8.2 6.8 5.6curve16 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.8 34.5 34 33.2 32.1 30.528.5 26.1 23.5 20.6 17.9 15.2 12.8 10.7 8.9 7.4 6.1 5.1curve17 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.7 34.4 33.9 33.1 32 30.328.3 25.8 23.1 20.3 17.5 14.9 12.5 10.4 8.6 7.2 5.9 4.9curve18 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.6 34.2 33.5 32.4 30.9 28.826.3 23.4 20.4 17.4 14.6 12.1 9.9 8.1 6.6 5.4 4.4 3.6curve19 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.8 29.5 29 28.2 27.1 25.623.7 21.5 19.1 16.6 14.2 12 10 8.3 6.8 5.6 4.6 3.8curve20 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.7 29.4 28.9 28.1 26.9 25.323.4 21.1 18.6 16.1 13.6 11.4 9.5 7.8 6.4 5.3 4.3 3.6curve21 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.7 29.3 28.7 27.7 26.2 24.422.1 19.6 17 14.4 12 9.9 8.1 6.6 5.4 4.4 3.6 2.9VC RATIO TO LOS CONVERSION (VALUE SHOWN IS LOWER LIMIT FOR THAT LOS)(URBAN ROADS USE SPEED BREAKS BELOW FORLOS DETERMINATION) (ALL USE THE BASE VC'S TO DETERMINE EXCEEDANCE)BASE RUR2 FWYA 0.00 0.00 0.00B 0.30 0.00 0.25C 0.50 0.10 0.40D 0.70 0.30 0.60E 0.90 0.50 0.80F 1.00 1.00 1.00F+ 1.10 1.10 1.10F++ 1.30 1.30 1.30SPEED VC RATIO BREAKS FOR URBAN STREETS (HIGHEST SPEED FOR GIVEN LOS & FF SPEED)FFS B C D E F>47 42. 34. 27. 21. 16.>37 35. 28. 22. 17. 13.>32 30. 24. 18. 14. 10.<33 25. 19. 13. 9. 7.LEVEL OF SERVICE THRESHOLD BY AREACentral Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesJuly, 2014**33**NUM LOS DEFINITION1 F CINCINNATI,CLEVELAND,COLUMBUS CENTRAL MPO COUNTIES (CUY,FRA,HAM)2 E OTHER TMA MPOS (AKRON,CANTON,DAYTON,TOLEDO,YOUNGSTOWN + NON-CENTRAL COUNTIES FROM 1)3 E OTHER MPOS & PARTS OF AREAS 1 & 2 OUTSIDE URBANIZED AREA4 E RURAL NON MPO COUNTIESPEAK SPREADING MODEL INFO (SET MAX ITERATIONS TO 0 TO DISABLE PEAK SPREADING)MAX VC RATIO FWY: 1.30MAX VC RATIO ART: 1.30MAX ITERATIONS : 1000TRUCK PCE: {cm3tpce}AQ SEASON FACTOR: {cm3aqfact}ENDCOPYrrmode='{cm3rmode}'if(rrmode='NORMAL')COPY FILE=dailyb.datMODEL CLASS PARAMETERS (MAX 4 CLASSES, HOURS 0-23 W/ NO OVERLAP IN CLASS, ALLOCATE ENTIRE CLASS AS TRUCK(1)OR NOT(0))CLS TRK 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0CLS BEG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0CLS END 23 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0CLS NUM 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0ENDCOPYvolff='li.1.{cm3volf}'trkfff='{cm3trkf}'if (trkfff == 'NONE') thentrkff='_zero'elsetrkff='li.1.{cm3trkf}'endifvol1s='_zero'vol2s='_zero'vol3s='_zero'Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesJuly, 2014**34**vol4s='_zero'vol5s='_zero'vol6s='_zero'vol7s='_zero'vol8s='_zero'vol9s='_zero'vol10s='_zero'vol11s='_zero'vol12s='_zero'vol13s='_zero'vol14s='_zero'vol15s='_zero'vol16s='_zero'elseif(rrmode='4PERIOD_OMS')COPY FILE=dailyb.datMODEL CLASS PARAMETERS (MAX 4 CLASSES, HOURS 0-23 W/ NO OVERLAP IN CLASS, ALLOCATE ENTIRE CLASS AS TRUCK(1)OR NOT(0))CLS TRK 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 00 0 0 0CLS BEG 18 6 9 14 18 6 9 14 0 0 0 00 0 0 0CLS END 5 8 13 17 5 8 13 17 0 0 0 00 0 0 0CLS NUM 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 00 0 0 0ENDCOPYvolff='_zero'trkff='_zero'vol1s='li.1.volnt_aut'vol2s='li.1.volam_aut'vol3s='li.1.volmd_aut'vol4s='li.1.volpm_aut'vol5s='li.1.volnt_trk'vol6s='li.1.volam_trk'vol7s='li.1.volmd_trk'vol8s='li.1.volpm_trk'vol9s='_zero'vol10s='_zero'vol11s='_zero'vol12s='_zero'Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesJuly, 2014**35**vol13s='_zero'vol14s='_zero'vol15s='_zero'vol16s='_zero'elseif(rrmode='4PERIOD_SW')COPY FILE=dailyb.datMODEL CLASS PARAMETERS (MAX 4 CLASSES, HOURS 0-23 W/ NO OVERLAP IN CLASS, ALLOCATE ENTIRE CLASS AS TRUCK(1)OR NOT(0))CLS TRK 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 00 0 0 0CLS BEG 19 7 10 16 19 7 10 16 0 0 0 00 0 0 0CLS END 6 9 15 18 6 9 15 18 0 0 0 00 0 0 0CLS NUM 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 00 0 0 0ENDCOPYvolff='_zero'trkff='_zero'vol1s='li.1.evvol_aut'vol2s='li.1.amvol_aut'vol3s='li.1.mdvol_aut'vol4s='li.1.pmvol_aut'vol5s='li.1.evvol_trk'vol6s='li.1.amvol_trk'vol7s='li.1.mdvol_trk'vol8s='li.1.pmvol_trk'vol9s='_zero'vol10s='_zero'vol11s='_zero'vol12s='_zero'vol13s='_zero'vol14s='_zero'vol15s='_zero'vol16s='_zero'elseif(rrmode='4PERIOD_MARKETSEGMENTS_SW')COPY FILE=dailyb.datMODEL CLASS PARAMETERS (MAX 4 CLASSES, HOURS 0-23 W/ NO OVERLAP IN CLASS, ALLOCATE ENTIRE CLASS AS TRUCK(1)OR NOT(0))Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesJuly, 2014**36**CLS TRK 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 00 0 0 0CLS BEG 19 7 10 16 19 7 10 16 19 7 10 1619 7 10 16CLS END 6 9 15 18 6 9 15 18 6 9 15 186 9 15 18CLS NUM 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 24 4 4 4ENDCOPYvolff='_zero'trkff='_zero'vol1s='li.1.evvol_autwk'vol2s='li.1.amvol_autwk'vol3s='li.1.mdvol_autwk'vol4s='li.1.pmvol_autwk'vol5s='li.1.evvol_trkhv'vol6s='li.1.amvol_trkhv'vol7s='li.1.mdvol_trkhv'vol8s='li.1.pmvol_trkhv'vol9s='li.1.evvol_autnw'vol10s='li.1.amvol_autnw'vol11s='li.1.mdvol_autnw'vol12s='li.1.pmvol_autnw'vol13s='li.1.evvol_trklt'vol14s='li.1.amvol_trklt'vol15s='li.1.mdvol_trklt'vol16s='li.1.pmvol_trklt'endif*if exist daily.dat del daily.dat*copy dailya.dat+dailyb.dat daily.dat*del dailya.dat*del dailyb.dat**RUN PGM=NETWORK**NETI={cm3neti.q}LINKO=templnk.txt, format = TXT, include = a(6),b(6),junk1(1),junk1(4),junks(1),moffpspd(4),ctoll(4),junkb(1),lanes(1),twidth(2),junkb(1),terrain(1),junk1(1),junkb(1),cap(6),vol(6),loneway(1),boffpspd(4),ttoll(4),junkb(1),blanes(1),areatype(1),admclass(1),junkb(1),bterrain(1),junk1(1),junkb(1),bcap(6),bvol(6),medturn(1),pcttrk(2),junk1(2),funclass(2),lnkgrp(2),mpostspd(2),jurisdic(1),county(3),rtenumb(5),junk1(7),nhs(1),fedfunc(2),trkvol(5),junkp(1),junk1(30),junk1(30),junk1(30),junk1(21),mdist(6),Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesJuly, 2014**37**vol1(6),vol2(6),vol3(6),vol4(6),vol5(6),vol6(6),vol7(6),vol8(6),vol9(6),vol10(6),vol11(6),vol12(6),vol13(6),vol14(6),vol15(6),vol16(6)NODEO=tempnod.txt, format = TXT, include = junkn(1),n(6),x(11),y(11)PHASE=NODEMERGEjunkn='N'ENDPHASEPHASE=LINKMERGE_zero=0junk1=0junks='S'junkp='P'fffff='{cm3pri}'/*;commented out 04/02/2012if(fffff=='SW')if(li.1.admclass==1 && li.1.district <13 && li.1.district>0)junkp='P';state systemelseif(li.1.district<13 && li.1.district>0)junkp='G';non-stateelsejunkp='U';out of stateendifelseif(fffff='OMS')if(li.1.admclass<6)junkp='P'elsejunkp='G'endifendif*/;commented out 04/02/2012jurisdic=' 'nhs=0fedfunc=li.1.fedfuncljunkb=' 'ctoll=0; =cartoll*10ttoll=0; =trktoll*10mdist = LI.1.DIST*1000moffpspd=li.1.offpspd*100mpeakspd=li.1.peakspd*100Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesJuly, 2014**38**cap=li.1.{cm3capf}*{cm3kfact}loneway='1'; el_oneway changebcap=0bvol=0boffpspd=0bpeakspd=0blanes=0bterrain=0mpostspd=round(li.1.postspd)vol=@volff@trkvol=@trkff@vol1=@vol1s@vol2=@vol2s@vol3=@vol3s@vol4=@vol4s@vol5=@vol5s@vol6=@vol6s@vol7=@vol7s@vol8=@vol8s@vol9=@vol9s@vol10=@vol10s@vol11=@vol11s@vol12=@vol12s@vol13=@vol13s@vol14=@vol14s@vol15=@vol15s@vol16=@vol16s@ENDPHASE**ENDRUN**aqmode='{cm3aqtype}'if(aqmode=='MOBILE')*copy {cm3effile.q} tempef.txt*N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\utils\postcms10.exe templnk.txt tempcms.txt N tempef.txt {cm3rmode}*del tempef.txtelse*N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\utils\postcms10.exe templnk.txt tempcms.txt N NONE {cm3rmode}endifif(aqmode=='MOVES')*copy {cm3effile.q} tempef.txtif(rrmode='NORMAL' && trkfff == 'NONE')then*N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\utils\movesnet.exe hourly.rpt tempef.txt cmstext.rpt {cm3aqfact}Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesJuly, 2014**39**else*N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\utils\movesnet.exe hourly.rpt tempef.txt cmstext.rpt {cm3aqfact} 1{cm3tpce} 3endifendif**RUN PGM=NETWORK**NETI[1]={cm3neti.q}LINKI[2]=tempcms.txt var=a,1-6,b,8-13,cVMT,97-111,cTRKVMT,113-128,cVOLPERLANE,130-137,cCONINDEX,139-146,cVCRATIO,148-155,cPEAKHOUR,157-160,cVHT,162-169,cCONGDELAY,171-178,cPHYSDELAY,180-187,cSPDLIMDELAY,189-196,cDELAYRATIO,198-205,cDIR1HRSEXCEED,229-232,cDIR2HRSEXCEED,234-237,cPKVMT,253-267,cEXCEEDVMT,269-283,cEXCEEDPKVMT,285-299,cLOS,317,1,,,1,select=(substr(record,1,1)!= 'A')NODEI[2]=tempnod.txt var=n,2-7, x,8-18, y,19-29NETO={cm3neto.q}MERGE RECORD=F**ENDRUN**iiztype='{cm3iztype}'if(iiztype=='TEXT')*copy {cm3ifile.q} tempif.txtelseif(iiztype=='OMSTABLE')**RUN PGM=MATRIX**FILEO PRINTO[1] = tempif.txtFILEI MATI[1] = {cm3ifile.q}MW[1]=mi.1.5+mi.1.10+mi.1.15jloopif(j=i)print list=i(4.0),mw[1][j](6.0),printo=1endifendjloop**ENDRUN**endifif(iiztype!='NONE')*copy {cm3afile.q} tempaf.txtCentral Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesJuly, 2014**40**if(aqmode=='MOBILE')*copy {cm3ieffile.q} tempief.txt*N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\utils\intracal2.exe tempif.txt summary.rpt tempaf.txt tempief.txt*del tempief.txtelseif(aqmode=='MOVES')*N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\utils\movesintra.exe tempif.txt tempef.txt tempaf.txt cmstext.rpt{cm3aqfact}*del tempef.txtendif*del tempaf.txt*DEL tempif.txtendifif(aqmode=='MOVES')*copy {cm3ieffile.q} tempief.txt*copy {cm3vfile.q} tempveh.txt*N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\utils\movesveh.exe tempveh.txt tempief.txt cmstext.rpt {cm3aqfact}*del tempveh.txt*del tempief.txtendifif(aqmode=='MOVES')*echo MOVES BASED EMISSIONS REPORT > tempcom.txtelseif(aqmode=='MOBILE')*echo MOBILE BASED EMISSIONS REPORT >> tempcom.txtelse*echo NO EMISSIONS ANALYSIS CONDUCTED >> tempcom.txtendif*echo {cm3aqcom} >> tempcom.txt*echo Loaded Network: {cm3neti} >> tempcom.txt*echo Network Emission Factors: {cm3effile} >> tempcom.txtif(aqmode=='MOVES')*echo Vehicle Emission Factors: {cm3ieffile} >> tempcom.txt*echo Vehicle Population : {cm3vfile} >> tempcom.txtelse*echo Intrazonal Emission Factors: {cm3ieffile} >> tempcom.txtendif*echo Intrazonal Trips : {cm3ifile} >> tempcom.txt*echo Area File (sq mi): {cm3afile} >> tempcom.txtCentral Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesJuly, 2014**41***echo Volume Field Used: {cm3volf} >> tempcom.txt*echo Truck Volume Field Used: {cm3trkf} >> tempcom.txt*echo Capacity Field Used: {cm3capf} >> tempcom.txt*echo ----------------------------------------- >> tempcom.txt*copy /B tempcom.txt+cmstext.rpt {cm3rpto.q}*if exist {cm3sumo.q} del {cm3sumo.q}*rename summary.rpt {cm3sumo.q}*del tempcom.txt*del cmstext.rpt*DEL tempnod.txt*DEL templnk.txt*DEL tempcms.txthhro=rightstr('{cm3hro}',4)if(hhro=='NONE')*del hourly.rptelse*if exist {cm3hro.q} del {cm3hro.q}*rename hourly.rpt {cm3hro.q}endifCentral Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesJuly, 2014**42**Appendix B–MORPC Travel Demand Model Emission Run Report for 2008MOVES BASED EMISSIONS REPORTOzone Analysis with MOVES - MORPCLoaded Network: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\2014_04\model\AQ\Network\AQ_asgn_2008.netNetwork Emission Factors: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\2014_04\model\factors\2008MORPC_ozone_3source_rpd.csvVehicle Emission Factors: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\2014_04\model\factors\2008MORPC_ozone_3source_rpv.csvVehicle Population : N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\2014_04\model\factors\Source_Type_Pop_2008_MORPC_on-Model.csvIntrazonal Trips : N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\2014_04\model\AQ\intra_z\county\fra08.txtArea File (sq mi): N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\2014_04\model\AQ\area_taz\TAZ_areain.txtVolume Field Used: VOL24_TOTTruck Volume Field Used: NONECapacity Field Used: CAP24-----------------------------------------CMS/AQ REPORTPOSTCMS10, UPDATED DEC 2009, GTGDATE:04/29/2014 TIME:10:40:49PARAMETER FILE DUMP (DAILY.DAT FILE)HOUR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1415 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23PCTADTURB FWY 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.9 2.2 5.2 7.3 6.4 5.2 4.9 5.1 5.3 5.5 6.17.2 8.0 7.9 5.8 4.2 3.4 2.9 2.2 1.5URB ART 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.5 3.5 5.7 5.5 5.1 5.3 6.2 6.5 6.4 6.87.6 8.2 8.1 6.2 4.8 4.0 3.0 1.9 1.3RUR FWY 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.3 2.2 3.7 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.6 5.6 5.7 6.0 6.57.1 7.5 7.0 5.6 4.5 3.8 3.2 2.5 2.0RUR ART 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.0 2.4 4.8 6.2 5.5 5.3 5.5 5.8 6.0 6.0 6.77.6 8.1 7.7 5.6 4.2 3.5 2.8 1.9 1.3PCTADT TRKURB FWY 2.1 1.9 1.8 2.0 2.4 3.0 3.9 4.6 5.3 6.0 6.3 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.35.8 5.2 4.6 4.1 3.7 3.4 3.1 2.8 2.4URB ART 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.3 3.9 5.9 6.9 6.7 7.1 7.6 7.4 7.2 7.47.2 6.0 5.0 3.7 2.8 2.3 1.9 1.5 1.3RUR FWY 2.6 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.6 3.1 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.1 5.6 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.85.6 5.3 4.9 4.6 4.3 4.0 3.8 3.5 3.1RUR ART 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.6 2.2 3.0 4.2 5.3 6.1 6.7 7.0 7.1 7.0 6.9 6.86.3 5.5 4.6 3.8 3.1 2.6 2.3 2.1 1.7PCTDIRURB FWY 38 40 40 46 56 64 70 70 68 62 58 52 52 52 5046 38 38 46 52 46 42 42 40URB ART 44 46 44 48 54 62 66 68 64 56 54 52 50 50 5046 40 38 46 52 48 46 46 46RUR FWY 44 46 48 54 60 68 68 64 58 54 52 50 50 52 5248 42 40 44 48 48 44 46 44Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesJuly, 2014**43**RUR ART 40 42 44 48 58 66 72 68 60 56 54 50 50 50 5046 40 38 46 50 46 44 44 44LOS E VC 0 0.625 1.25 1.875 2.5 3.125 3.75 4.375 5 5.625 6.25 6.875 7.5 8.125 8.759.375 10 10.625 11.25 11.875 12.5 13.125 13.75 14.375SPEEDVCcurve1 75 75 75 75 75 75 74.9 74.8 74.6 74.2 73.5 72.3 70.5 67.8 64.259.5 54 47.7 41.2 34.9 28.9 23.7 19.2 15.5curve2 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 69.9 69.8 69.6 69.2 68.4 67.1 65.1 62.258.2 53 47 40.5 33.9 27.7 22.2 17.6 13.8curve3 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 64.9 64.8 64.4 63.8 62.6 60.557 52 45.4 37.8 29.9 22.7 16.7 12.1 8.6curve4 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 59.9 59.8 59.6 59.1 58.2 56.754.3 50.8 46.1 40.3 33.8 27.3 21.3 16.2 12.2curve5 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 54.9 54.7 54.3 53.652.3 50 46.5 41.5 35.3 28.5 21.9 16.1 11.5curve6 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 59.9 59.8 59.7 59.4 59.1 58.5 57.756.5 55 53.1 50.7 47.9 44.7 41.1 37.3 33.4curve7 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 54.9 54.9 54.7 54.5 54.2 53.8 53.152.2 50.9 49.3 47.3 44.9 42.1 39 35.7 32.2curve8 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.9 49.8 49.6 49.4 49 48.547.7 46.7 45.4 43.8 41.8 39.5 36.8 33.9 30.9curve9 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 44.9 44.8 44.7 44.4 44.1 43.643 42.1 40.9 39.4 37.6 35.5 33.1 30.5 27.8curve10 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.8 49.7 49.4 49 48.4 47.5 46.5 45.1 43.5 41.739.6 37.3 34.9 32.4 29.8 27.3 24.9 22.6 20.4curve11 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.7 49.4 48.9 48 46.7 44.9 42.5 39.6 36.232.6 28.7 25 21.4 18.2 15.3 12.9 10.8 9curve12 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.8 49.6 49.1 48.2 46.8 44.5 41.4 37.5 32.928 23.1 18.7 14.9 11.8 9.2 7.2 5.7 4.5curve13 40 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.8 39.5 39.2 38.6 37.8 36.7 35.3 33.531.4 29 26.4 23.7 21.1 18.5 16.1 13.9 12curve14 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.8 39.6 39.1 38.5 37.5 36.1 34.3 32.1 29.426.5 23.5 20.5 17.7 15.1 12.8 10.7 9 7.6curve15 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.7 39.4 38.8 37.9 36.5 34.7 32.3 29.5 26.423.2 20 17 14.3 11.9 9.9 8.2 6.8 5.6curve16 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.8 34.5 34 33.2 32.1 30.5 28.5 26.1 23.520.6 17.9 15.2 12.8 10.7 8.9 7.4 6.1 5.1curve17 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.7 34.4 33.9 33.1 32 30.3 28.3 25.8 23.120.3 17.5 14.9 12.5 10.4 8.6 7.2 5.9 4.9curve18 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.6 34.2 33.5 32.4 30.9 28.8 26.3 23.4 20.417.4 14.6 12.1 9.9 8.1 6.6 5.4 4.4 3.6curve19 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.8 29.5 29 28.2 27.1 25.6 23.7 21.5 19.116.6 14.2 12 10 8.3 6.8 5.6 4.6 3.8curve20 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.7 29.4 28.9 28.1 26.9 25.3 23.4 21.1 18.616.1 13.6 11.4 9.5 7.8 6.4 5.3 4.3 3.6curve21 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.7 29.3 28.7 27.7 26.2 24.4 22.1 19.6 1714.4 12 9.9 8.1 6.6 5.4 4.4 3.6 2.9VC RATIO TO LOS CONVERSION (VALUE SHOWN IS LOWER LIMIT FOR THAT LOS)(URBAN ROADS USE SPEED BREAKS BELOW FOR LOS DETERMINATION) (ALL USETHE BASE VC'S TO DETERMINE EXCEEDANCE)Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesJuly, 2014**44**BASE RUR2 FWYA 0.00 0.00 0.00B 0.30 0.00 0.25C 0.50 0.10 0.40D 0.70 0.30 0.60E 0.90 0.50 0.80F 1.00 1.00 1.00F+ 1.10 1.10 1.10F++ 1.30 1.30 1.30SPEED VC RATIO BREAKS FOR URBAN STREETS (HIGHEST SPEED FOR GIVEN LOS & FF SPEED)FFS B C D E F>47 42. 34. 27. 21. 16.>37 35. 28. 22. 17. 13.>32 30. 24. 18. 14. 10.<33 25. 19. 13. 9. 7.LEVEL OF SERVICE THRESHOLD BY AREANUM LOS DEFINITION1 F CINCINNATI,CLEVELAND,COLUMBUS CENTRAL MPO COUNTIES (CUY,FRA,HAM)2 E OTHER TMA MPOS (AKRON,CANTON,DAYTON,TOLEDO,YOUNGSTOWN + NON-CENTRAL COUNTIES FROM 1)3 E OTHER MPOS & PARTS OF AREAS 1 & 2 OUTSIDE URBANIZED AREA4 E RURAL NON MPO COUNTIESPEAK SPREADING MODEL INFO (SET MAX ITERATIONS TO 0 TO DISABLE PEAK SPREADING)MAX VC RATIO FWY: 1.30MAX VC RATIO ART: 1.30MAX ITERATIONS : 1000TRUCK PCE: 2.0AQ SEASON FACTOR: 1.08MODEL CLASS PARAMETERS (MAX 4 CLASSES, HOURS 0-23 W/ NO OVERLAP IN CLASS, ALLOCATE ENTIRE CLASS AS TRUCK(1) OR NOT(0))CLS TRK 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00CLS BEG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00CLS END 23 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00CLS NUM 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00MOVES NETWORK LINK EMISSIONS OUTPUTCOUNTY MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5ADA JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ALL JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ASD JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ATB JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ATH JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000AUG JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesJuly, 2014**45**BEL JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000BRO JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000BUT JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CAR JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CHP JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CLA JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CLE JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CLI JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000COL JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000COS JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CRA JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CUY JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000DAR JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000DEF JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000DEL JANUARY 4593746. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ERI JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000FAI JANUARY 1564756. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000FAY JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000FRA JANUARY 29955170. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000FUL JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000GAL JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000GEA JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000GRE JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000GUE JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HAM JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HAN JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HAR JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HAS JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HEN JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HIG JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HOC JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HOL JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HUR JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JAC JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JEF JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000KNO JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LAK JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LAW JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LIC JANUARY 4683831. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LOG JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LOR JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LUC JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MAD JANUARY 802361. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MAH JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MAR JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MED JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MEG JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MER JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MIA JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MOE JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MOT JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesJuly, 2014**46**MRG JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MRW JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MUS JANUARY 107344. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000NOB JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000OTT JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PAU JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PER JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PIC JANUARY 771943. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PIK JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000POR JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PRE JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PUT JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000RIC JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ROS JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SAN JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SCI JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SEN JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SHE JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000STA JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SUM JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000TRU JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000TUS JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000UNI JANUARY 1375900. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000VAN JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000VIN JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WAR JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WAS JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WAY JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WIL JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WOO JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WYA JANUARY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000XXX JANUARY 34621. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000TOT JANUARY 43874524. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ADA APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ALL APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ASD APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ATB APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ATH APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000AUG APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000BEL APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000BRO APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000BUT APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CAR APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CHP APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CLA APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CLE APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CLI APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000COL APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000COS APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CRA APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CUY APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesJuly, 2014**47**DAR APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000DEF APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000DEL APRIL 4593746. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ERI APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000FAI APRIL 1564756. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000FAY APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000FRA APRIL 29955170. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000FUL APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000GAL APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000GEA APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000GRE APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000GUE APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HAM APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HAN APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HAR APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HAS APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HEN APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HIG APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HOC APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HOL APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HUR APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JAC APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JEF APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000KNO APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LAK APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LAW APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LIC APRIL 4683831. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LOG APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LOR APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LUC APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MAD APRIL 802361. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MAH APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MAR APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MED APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MEG APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MER APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MIA APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MOE APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MOT APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MRG APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MRW APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MUS APRIL 107344. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000NOB APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000OTT APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PAU APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PER APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PIC APRIL 771943. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PIK APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000POR APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PRE APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PUT APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesJuly, 2014**48**RIC APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ROS APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SAN APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SCI APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SEN APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SHE APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000STA APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SUM APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000TRU APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000TUS APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000UNI APRIL 1375900. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000VAN APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000VIN APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WAR APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WAS APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WAY APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WIL APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WOO APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WYA APRIL 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000XXX APRIL 34621. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000TOT APRIL 43874524. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ADA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ALL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ASD JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ATB JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ATH JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000AUG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000BEL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000BRO JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000BUT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CHP JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CLA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CLE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CLI JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000COL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000COS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CRA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000CUY JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000DAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000DEF JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000DEL JULY 4961246. 4.9865 14.6985 0.0000 0.0000ERI JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000FAI JULY 1689937. 1.5448 4.7334 0.0000 0.0000FAY JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000FRA JULY 32351584. 53.7694 130.3709 0.0000 0.0000FUL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000GAL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000GEA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000GRE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000GUE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesJuly, 2014**49**HAM JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HAN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HAS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HEN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HIG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HOC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HOL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000HUR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JAC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JEF JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000KNO JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LAK JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LAW JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LIC JULY 5058537. 5.7217 16.1163 0.0000 0.0000LOG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LOR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000LUC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MAD JULY 866550. 0.7521 2.3643 0.0000 0.0000MAH JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MED JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MEG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MER JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MIA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MOE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MOT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MRG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MRW JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000MUS JULY 115932. 0.0927 0.2925 0.0000 0.0000NOB JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000OTT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PAU JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PER JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PIC JULY 833698. 0.6705 2.2002 0.0000 0.0000PIK JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000POR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PRE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000PUT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000RIC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000ROS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SAN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SCI JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SEN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SHE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000STA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000SUM JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000TRU JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000TUS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000UNI JULY 1485973. 1.7530 4.8751 0.0000 0.0000VAN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesJuly, 2014**50**VIN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WAS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WAY JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WIL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WOO JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000WYA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000XXX JULY 37391. 0.0236 0.0867 0.0000 0.0000TOT JULY 47384488. 69.2779 175.6670 0.0000 0.0000MOVES INTRAZONAL EMISSIONS OUTPUTFRANKLIN COUNTYMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 21378. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 21378. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 23088. 0.0175 0.0605 0.0000 0.0000DELAWARE COUNTYMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 3147. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 3147. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 3399. 0.0026 0.0089 0.0000 0.0000LICKING COUNTYMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 7563. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 7563. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 8168. 0.0062 0.0214 0.0000 0.0000FAIRFIELD COUNTYMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 4163. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 4163. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 4496. 0.0034 0.0118 0.0000 0.0000MADISON COUNTYMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 782. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 782. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 844. 0.0006 0.0022 0.0000 0.0000MOVES VEHICLE BASED EMISSIONS OUTPUTMONTH VEHICLES HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 1763111. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 1763111. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 1904160. 52.1614 51.2648 0.0000 0.0000Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission EstimatesJuly, 2014**51**Appendix C–MORPC HPMS VMT and EmissionsCOMBINED OFF-MODEL AREA EMISSIONS2008MOVES BASED HPMS EMISSIONS REPORTMORPC area AQ analysis - Ozone emissions AnalysisInput VMT File: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\2014_04\model\factors\MORPC_All_Off-Model_VMT_2008.csvNetwork Emission Factors: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\2014_04\model\factors\2008MORPC_ozone_3source_rpd.csvVehicle Emission Factors: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\2014_04\model\factors\2008MORPC_ozone_3source_rpv.csvVehicle Population: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\2014_04\model\factors\Source_Type_Pop_2008_MORPC_off-model_HPMS.csv-----------------------------------------DATE:04/29/2014 TIME:12:52:09PARAMETER FILE DUMP (DAILY.DAT FILE)HOUR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1415 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23PCTADTURB FWY 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.9 2.2 5.2 7.3 6.4 5.2 4.9 5.1 5.3 5.5 6.17.2 8.0 7.9 5.8 4.2 3.4 2.9 2.2 1.5URB ART 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.5 3.5 5.7 5.5 5.1 5.3 6.2 6.5 6.4 6.87.6 8.2 8.1 6.2 4.8 4.0 3.0 1.9 1.3RUR FWY 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.3 2.2 3.7 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.6 5.6 5.7 6.0 6.57.1 7.5 7.0 5.6 4.5 3.8 3.2 2.5 2.0RUR ART 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.0 2.4 4.8 6.2 5.5 5.3 5.5 5.8 6.0 6.0 6.77.6 8.1 7.7 5.6 4.2 3.5 2.8 1.9 1.3AQ SEASON FACTOR: 1.08000004MOVES HPMS EMISSIONS OUTPUTMONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 4521707. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 4521707. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 4883444. 2.0500 9.6658 0.0000 0.0000MOVES VEHICLE BASED EMISSIONS OUTPUTMONTH VEHICLES HC NOX SO2 PM2.5JANUARY 143274. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000APRIL 143274. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000JULY 154736. 4.2387 4.1659 0.0000 0.0000