June 26, 2013 

IM Ref. No. 20134121538 

First Trust Strategic High Income 

Fund II, First Trust Senior Floating 

Rate Income Fund II, and First Trust 

RESPONSE OF THE OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL Mortgage Income Fund 

DIVISION OF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT File No. 811-21842 

Your letter dated June 20,2013 requests our assurance that we would not recommend 

enforcement action to the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") under Section 

5(b) or Section 6(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") against First Trust 

Strategic High Income Fund II ("FHY"), First Trust Senior Floating Rate Income Fund II 

("FCT") or First Trust Mortgage Income Fund ("FMY") (each, a "Fund," and collectively, the 

"Funds"), each of which filed and had declared effective by the Commission a shelf registration 

statement on Form N-2 ("Registration Statement"), if a Fund files a post-effective amendment to 

its Registration Statement pursuant to Rule 486(b) under the Securities Act, under the 

circumstances set forth in your letter. 

Background 

You state that each Fund is a closed-end management investment company registered 

under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "Investment Company Act"). Each Fund filed 

and had declared effective by the Commission its Registration Statement pursuant to which it 

may issue common shares on a delayed basis in accordance with Rule 415(a)(1)(x) under the 

Securities Act and the positions ofthe Commission staff. 1 First Trust Advisors L.P. serves as the 

investment adviser to each Fund. Brookfield Investment Management Inc. serves as the 

subadviser to FHY and FMY. Each Fund's common shares are registered under Section 12(b) of 

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange. 

FHY and FMY have a fiscal year ending on October 31. FCT has a fiscal year ending on May 

31. 

You state that each Fund's board oftrustees (the "Board"), including a majority of 

independent trustees, has concluded that a continuously effective shelf registration statement 

would be beneficial to each Fund, its shareholders and potential investors. You state that each 

Fund, therefore, needs a continuously effective Registration Statement, and annually would have 

to file post-effective amendments to its Registration Statement pursuant to Section 8(c) ofthe 

Securities Act ("Post-Effective Amendments") to bring the Fund's financial statements up to 

date or to make other non-material changes. You further state that each Fund, its shareholders 

and potential investors would benefit if Post-Effective Amendments filed for the purpose of 

bringing the Fund's financial statements up to date or to make any other non-material changes 

were effective immediately, as permitted by Rule 486(b) under the Securities Act available to 

certain registered closed-end investment companies. You state that utilization of Rule 486(b) 

would help ensure that the Funds have the ability to raise capital as the opportunity arises, and 

could reduce expenses incurred by the Funds in the Post-Effective Amendment process. You 

See Nuveen Virginia Premium Income Municipal Fund, SEC Staff No-Action Letter (Oct. 6, 2006); Pilgrim 

America Prime Rate Trust, SEC StaffNo-Action Letter (May I, 1998) ("Pilgrim Letter"). 
further state that due to the limited purposes for which the Funds would use Rule 486(b ), no 

erosion ofinvestor protection would occur and investors could have faster access to important 

information about the Funds, including their updated financial information. 

Discussion 

Rule 486(b) under the Securities Act, in relevant part, states that a post-effective 

amendment to a registration statement filed by a registered closed-end management investment 

company which makes periodic repurchase offers under Rule 23c-3 under the Investment 

Company Act ("Interval Fund") shall become effective on the date on which it is filed with the 

Commission, provided that certain conditions are met. The conditions of Rule 486(b) require, 

among other things, that the post-effective amendment be filed for no purpose other than, among 

other things, bringing the financial statements up to date or making non-material changes, and 

that the registrant make certain representations concerning the purpose for which the amendment 

is filed. 

In adopting Rule 486(b) in 1994, the Commission recognized that Interval Funds may 

have a need to raise capital continuously, and therefore need continuously effective registration 

statements and would benefit if certain filings could become effective automatically. 2 The 

Commission staff in 1998 recognized that registered closed-end management investment 

companies such as the Funds, which are not Interval Funds, also may benefit from the flexibility 

to take advantage of favorable market conditions to raise additional capital through continuous or 

delayed offerings of their securities. 3 You assert that the Funds and their shareholders also 

would benefit ifthe Funds' Post-Effective Amendments that comply with the conditions of Rule 

486(b) could become effective immediately pursuant to that Rule. 

You represent that each filing made in reliance on the requested relief would be made in 

compliance with the conditions of Rule 486(b), and that each Fund will file a Post-Effective 

Amendment containing a prospectus pursuant to Section 8( c) ofthe Securities Act prior to any 

offering of its common shares at a price below net asset value. You also represent that in relying 

on the requested relief to sell common shares, each Fund will sell newly issued shares at a price 

no lower than the sum ofthe Fund's net asset value plus the per share commission or 

underwriting discount. 4 

Conclusion 

Based on the facts and representations set forth in your letter, we would not recommend 

that the Commission take any enforcement action under Section 5(b) or Section 6(a) ofthe 

Securities Act against the Funds if the Funds file Post-Effective Amendments to their 

2 See Post-Effective Amendments to Investment Company Registration Statements, Investment Company 

Act Release No. 20486 (Aug. 17, 1994), n.22 and accompanying text. An Interval Fund operates pursuant to a 

fundamental policy that requires the Interval Fund to make periodic offers to repurchase its common stock in an 

amount not less than five percent of the outstanding shares. See Rule 23c-3 under the Investment Company Act. 

These repurchase offers may create a need for the Interval Fund to replenish its assets by making a continuous or 

intermittent offering of its common stock. See Continuous or Delayed Offerings by Certain Closed-End 

Management Investment Companies; Automatic Effectiveness of Certain Registration Statements and Post-Effective 

Amendments, Investment Company Act Release No. 19391 (Apr. 7, 1993). 

S ee Pilgrim Letter, supra note 1, at n .12 and accompanying text. 

4 See Pilgrim Letter, supra note I , at n.4 and accompanying text. 

2 

Registration Statements pursuant to Rule 486(b) under the Securities Act. This response 

expresses our view on enforcement action only and does not express any legal or interpretive 

conclusion on the issues presented. Because our position is based upon all of the facts and 

representations in your letter, any different facts or representations may require a different 

conclusion.5 We note that each Fund has acknowledged that the staff may withdraw any 

assurance granted in this letter if the staff finds that the Fund is misusing Rule 486(b) or for any 

other reason. 

(h._,~~\ 

Adam Glazer 

Senior Counsel 

The Division oflnvestment Management generally permits third parties to rely on no-action or interpretive 

letters to the extent that the third party's facts and circumstances are substantially similar to those described in the 

underlying request for a no-action or interpretive letter. See Informal Guidance Program for Small Entities, 

Investment Company Act Release No. 22587 (Mar. 27, 1997), n.20. In light of the very fact-specific nature of the 

Funds' request, however, the position expressed in this letter applies only to the Funds, and no other entity may rely 

on this position. The staff is willing to consider similar requests from other registered closed-end management 

investment companies. 

3 

Chapman and Cutler LLP 

Attorneys at Law . Focused on Finance'
 

June 20, 2013 

Division of Investment Management 

United States Securities and Exchange Commission 

100 F Street, N.E. 

Washington, DC 20549 

Attn: Ms. Nadya B. Roytblat 

Re: First Trust Funds and Rule 486(b) 

Dear Ms. Roytblat: 

On behalf of First Trust Strategic High Income Fund II ("FHY"), First Trust Senior 

Floating Rate Income Fund II ("FCT") and First Trust Mortgage Income Fund ("FMY" and 

together with FRY and FCT, the "Funds" and each, a "Fund") we seek assurance that the Staff 

of the Division of Investment Management (the "Staff') wil not recommend enforcement action 

against the Funds to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") under 

Section 5 or Section 6(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act") if the 

Funds utilize Rule 486(b) of the Securities Act, under the circumstances set forth in this letter. 

Background 

FHY, FCT and FMY are each a closed-end management investment company registered 

under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "Investment Company Act"). First Trust 

Advisors L.P. ("FTA") serves as the investment adviser to the Funds. FMY and FRY have a 

fiscal year ending October 31 and FCT has a fiscal year ending May 31. Brookfeld Investment 

Management Inc. serves as the sub-adviser to each of FHY and FMY, with the primary 

responsibility for the day-to-day supervision and investment strategy of FHY and FMY. FT A's 

Senior Loan Team is responsible for the day-to-day supervision and investment strategy of FCT. 

Each Fund's common shares are registered under Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act 

of 1934 and each of the Funds has been listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange since 

the respective Fund's inception. Each Fund has filed and had declared effective by the 

Commission a shelf registration statement on Form N-2, pursuant to which each Fund issued 

shares of common stock in accordance with Rule 415(a)(1)(x) of the Securities Act, consistent 

with the positions of the Staff articulated in Pilgrim America Prime Rate Trust (pub. avaiL. 

May 1, 1998) and Nuveen Virginia Premium Income Municipal Fund (pub. avaiL. October 6, 

2006). 

The Commission initially declared effective FR's Form N-2 shelf registration statement 

(File Nos. 333-180240; 811-21842) on May 31, 2012, FMY's Form N-2 shelf registration 

3225448.01. 1. doc 

Chicago New York Salt Lake City San Francisco Washington, DC 0000204 
Chapman and Cutler LLP 

Ms. Nadya B. Roytblat 

June 20,2013 

Page 2 

statement (File Nos. 333-170228; 811-21727) on June 15, 2012 and FCT's Form N-2 shelf 

registration statement (File Nos. 333-184182; 811-21539) on November 16,2012. 

The Board of Trustees (the "Board") of each Fund, including each of their respective 

independent trustees, has concluded that the continued ability to raise capital through the public 

offering of additional shares of common stock on a delayed and continuous basis is of great 

benefit to each Fund, their shareholders and potential investors. However, the Funds' shelf 

registration statements may not be continuously effective due to the post-effective amendment 

process currently implemented by the Commission, which requires the Commission to review 

and declare effective any post-effective amendments filed to a shelf registration statement in 

order to bring the Funds' financial statements up to date. The Board of each Fund, including 

each of their respective independent trustees, believes that the Funds, their shareholders and 

potential investors would benefit if the Funds were permitted to utilize Rule 486(b) under the 

Securities Act to file post-effective amendments to their shelf registration statements to bring 

their financial statements up to date that would become effective immediately upon filing with 

the Commission. 

Discussion 

Rule 415(a)(3) of the Securities Act requires a registrant that is an investment company 

filing on Form N-2 (the registration statement utilized by closed-end funds) to furnish the 

undertakings required by Item 34.4 of Form N-2. Item 34.4.a of Form N-2 requires a registrant 

to undertake "to file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective 

amendment to the registration statement: (l) to include any prospectus required by 

Section 1O(a)(3) of the 1933 Act." 

Each Fund has made this undertking in its effective registration statement. As a 

consequence, each Fund currently is required to fie a post-effective amendment on an annual 

basis to update its shelf registration statement with its audited financial statements in accordance 

with this undertaking, as well as to make any non-material updates. Each Fund currently is 

required to satisfy this undertaking by fiing a post-effective amendment with the Commission 

pursuant to Section 8(c) of the Securities Act. Section 8(c) does not provide a mechanism for 

automatic effectiveness. A post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Section 8(c) must be 

declared effective by the Staff in order to take effect. This process subjects the post-effective
 

amendment to review and comment by the Staff, including for routine non-material amendments. 

Prior to the post-effective amendment being declared effective by the Staff, a Fund cannot issue 

common shares of beneficial interest pursuant to it, thereby potentially preventing the Fund from 

taking advantage of what may be an attractive market to raise capital for the benefit of Fund 

shareholders. 
Chapman and Cutler LLP 

Ms. Nadya B. Roytblat 

June 20,2013 

Page 3
 

Closed-end funds that are operated as interval funds pursuant to Rule 23c-3 under the 

Investment Company Act are not subject to these delays. Rule 486(b) generally provides that a 

post-effective amendment to a registration statement, or a registration statement for additional 

shares of common stock, filed by a registered closed-end management investment company or 

business development company which makes periodic repurchase offers under Rule 23c-3 of the 

Investment Company Act (collectively, "Interval Funds") shall become immediately effective 

on the date it is fied, or on a later date designated by the registrant that is no more than 30 days 

after the fiing is made, provided that the post-effective amendment or registration statement is 

filed solely (i) to register additional shares of common stock for which a registration statement 

filed on Form N-2 is effective, (ii) to bring the financial statements up to date under 

Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act or Rule 3-18 of Regulation S-X, (iii) to designate a new 

effective date for a previously filed post-effective amendment or registration statement for 

additional shares under Rule 486(a), which has not yet become effective, (iv) to disclose or 

update the information required by Item 9c of Form N-2; (v) to make any non-material changes 

the registrant deems appropriate, and (vi) for any other purpose the Commission shall approve. 

In the adopting release for Rule 486 (Release NO.333-7083 & IC-20486), the 

Commission stated that "(t)he initial proposal of rule 486 recognized that closed-end interval 

funds may need continuously effective registration statements and would benefit if certain filings 

could become effectively automatically." As closed-end funds that are conducting offerings 

pursuant to Rule 415(a)(1)(x), the Funds believe that Rule 486 should be extended to them. The 

Funds believe that, like Interval Funds, the Funds, their common shareholders and potential 

investors would also benefit from having continuously effective registration statements. The 

benefits of the Funds' ability to use Rule 486(b) in order to maintain a continuously effective 

registration statement include: 

. ensuring that the Funds have the ability to raise capital if the opportunity arises; 

. reducing expenses incurred by the Funds and the Commission as a result of the 

registration statement review and comment process; and 

. providing investors with faster availability of the Funds' financial statements. 

Due to the limited purposes for which the Funds could use Rule 486(b), the Funds believe 

that the Commission's public policy to protect investors would not be compromised.
 

Furthermore, offerings by the Funds of their common stock pursuant to their respective shelf 

registration statements are subject to Section 23(b) of the Investment Company Act, which 

generally requires that the public offering price of common shares of a closed-end investment 

company (exclusive of distribution commissions and discounts) equal or exceed the net asset 

value per share of the Funds' common shares (calculated within 48 hours of pricing), absent 

shareholder approval or under certin other circumstances. Each of the Funds has specified in its 

shelf registration statement that the public offering price of the Fund's common shares offered 
Chapman and Cutler LLP 

Ms. Nadya B. Roytblat 

June 20,2013 

Page 4 

pursuant to its shelf registration statement will be equal to or in excess of the net asset value per 

share of the Fund's common shares (exclusive of distribution commissions and discounts) as 

specified in Section 23(b) of the Investment Company Act) The Funds represent that at the time 

of each post-effective amendment filing, such filings will be made in compliance with the 

conditions of Rule 486(b), and the Funds will comply with each of the undertkings currently 

found in their respective currently effective shelf-registration statements. 

We recognize that the Staff has previously granted No-Action relief to certain registered 

closed-end management investment companies seeking to utilize Rule 486(b) to amend their 

shelf registration statements.2 We understand that the No-Action relief granted in the Prior 

No-Action Letters apply only to the funds referenced in the Prior No-Action Letters and no other 

entity may rely on the relief. However, the Prior No-Action Letters state that the Staff is wiling 

to consider similar requests. We believe the circumstances surrounding the shelf registration 

statement fiings of the Funds are substantially identical to the circumstances as set forth in the 

Prior No-Action Letters and, as set forth above, believe that the Funds should be entitled to 

similar No-Action relief. 

Each Fund would utilize Rule 486(b) to fie post-effective amendments only to: (1) bring 

the financial statements of the Fund up to date under Section 1O(a)(3) of the Securities Act or 

Rule 3-18 of Regulation S-X; (2) update the information required by Item 9.1.c of Form N-2; or 

(3) make any non-material changes the registrant deems appropriate. The Funds would not seek 

to use a fiing made in accordance with Rule 486(b) to register additional securities without first 

obtaining relief from Rule 413 under the Securities Act. 

1	 Each Fund will file a Post-Effective Amendment containing a prospectus pursuant to Section 8(c) of the 

Securities Act prior to any offering of its common stock below net asset value. 

2 See, e.g., Aberdeen Australia Equity Fund, Inc., Aberdeen Chile Fund, Inc. and Aberdeen Global Income 

Fund, Inc. (pub. avaiL. April 12, 2012), Calamos Advisors LLC (pub. avaiL. Feb. 14, 2011) and Nuveen 

Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund (pub. avaiL. Nov. 9, 2010) (collectively, the "Prior No-Action 

Letters"). 
Chapman and Cutler LLP 

Ms. Nadya B. Roytblat 

June 20, 2013 

Page 5
 

Each Fund acknowledges that the Staff may withdraw any assurance granted in response 

to this letter if the Staff finds that the Fund is misusing Rule 486(b), or for any other reason. 

Please contact the undersigned at (312) 845-3273 with questions or comments regarding this 

letter. 

Walter L. Draney 

cc: W. Scott Jardine, First Trust Advisors L.P.