alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T.C. Summary Opinion 2002-86

UNITED STATES TAX COURT

SCOTT T. NOBLES, Petitioner v . COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 5275-00S. Filed July 11, 2002.
Scott T. Nobles, pro se. Paul K. Voelker , for respondent.

PAJAK, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463. The decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion should not be cited as authority. All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue. All Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioners’ 1998 Federal income tax in the amount of $2,088. After concessions by- 2 -

both parties, the sole issue for decision is whether petitioner is entitled to a greater automobile mileage allowance than that allowed by respondent. Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found. Petitioner resided in North Highlands, California, at the time his petition was filed. During 1998, petitioner was in the hardwood floor business. Petitioner owned a 1977 Chevrolet Sierra pickup truck and used it exclusively in his business. On his 1998 Federal income tax return, petitioner claimed a deduction for actual automobile expenses in the amount of $13,409. Respondent disallowed that amount, as well as others that have been resolved by concessions, and allowed $6,538 based on a reconstruction of approximately 21,700 miles at the standard mileage rate. Section 7491 does not apply in this case because petitioner has not complied with all applicable substantiation requirements. Sec. 7491(a)(2)(A). Section 274(d) requires a taxpayer to substantiate the business use of listed property, as defined in section 280F(d)(4), which includes a pickup truck, by adequate records or by sufficient evidence corroborating the taxpayer’s own statement. The limited evidence placed in the record by petitioner fails to persuade us that he is entitled to a greater allowance for mileage than respondent allowed. Accordingly, we- 3 -

have no choice but to sustain respondent’s determination on this point. Reviewed and adopted as the report of the Small Tax Case Division. To reflect the concessions, Decision will be entered under Rule 155
.
### §7302. Composition of Teams

Each Team shall be composed of individuals selected by the Director and led by an individual designated by the Director. Team members shall include at least 1 employee of the National Institute of Standards and Technology and shall include other experts who are not employees of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, who may include private sector experts, university experts, representatives of professional organizations with appropriate expertise, and appropriate Federal, State, or local officials. Team members who are not Federal employees shall be considered Federal Government contractors.

(Pub. L. 107–231, §3, Oct. 1, 2002, 116 Stat. 1472.)
§ 806.45 Appeal of determination. ( a ) A final determination of the grandfathered quantity by the Executive Director must be appealed to the Commission within 30 days from actual notice of the determination.
( b ) The Commission shall appoint a hearing officer to preside over appeals under this section. Hearings shall be governed by the procedures set forth in part 808 of this chapter.
# C_2011103EN.01001501.xml

| 2.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/15

---

Action brought on 21 January 2011 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-34/11)

2011/C 103/26

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: P. Guerra e Andrade and A. Alcover San Pedro, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Portuguese Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by failing to ensure that the concentrations of PM10 in ambient air do not exceed the limit values required under Article 13 of Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe, (1) the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 13 of Directive 2008/50/EC. |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to ensure that the concentrations of PM10 in ambient air do not exceed the limit values required under Article 13 of Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe, (1) the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 13 of Directive 2008/50/EC.

10

1

| — | Order the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In view of the objections raised by the Commission in its decision of 26 November 2009, and in the light of the reports submitted by Portugal, which show that the PM10 limit values continue to be exceeded in various zones and agglomerations and indicate in some cases a trend towards the long-term exceedance of the limits, the Commission takes the view that for the agglomerations and zones of Braga, Porto literal, Área Metropolitana de Lisboa Norte and Área Metropolitana de Lisboa Sul the Portuguese State has failed to fulfil the requirements of Article 13 of Directive 2008/50/EC.

10

---

(1)  OJ 2008 L 152, p. 1.

1

---
#### Betty J. Cohen, Respondent, v. Metropolitan Savings Bank, Defendant, and Margaret G. Katz, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Lotos Katz, Deceased, Defendant-Appellant. (Action No. 1.) Margaret G. Katz, Appellant, v. Betty Cohen et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 2)

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 6 

Authorizing the printing of a commemorative document in memory of the 

late President of the United States, George Herbert Walker Bush. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2019 

Mr. BLUNT (for himself and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) submitted the following 

concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the printing of a commemorative document in 

memory of the late President of the United States, 

George Herbert Walker Bush. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. COMMEMORATIVE DOCUMENT AUTHORIZED. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—A commemorative document in 

5 memory of the late President of the United States, George 

6 Herbert Walker Bush, shall be printed as a House docu7 ment, with illustrations and suitable binding, under the 

8 direction of the Joint Committee on Printing. 

9 (b) CONTENTS.—The document shall consist of the 

10 eulogies and encomiums for George Herbert Walker Bush, 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 6 ATS 

1 as expressed in the Senate and the House of Representa2 tives, together with the texts of each of the following: 

3 (1) The state funeral ceremony at the United 

4 States Capitol Rotunda. 

5 (2) The national funeral service held at the 

6 Washington National Cathedral, Washington, Dis7 trict of Columbia. 

8 (3) The memorial service held at St. Martin’s 

9 Episcopal Church, Houston, Texas. 

10 (4) The interment ceremony at the George Her11 bert Walker Bush Presidential Library Center, Col12 lege Station, Texas. 

13 SEC. 2. PRINTING OF DOCUMENT. 

14 In addition to the usual number of copies printed, 

15 there shall be printed the lesser of— 

16 (1) 32,500 copies of the commemorative docu17 ment, of which 22,150 copies shall be for the use of 

18 the House of Representatives and 10,350 copies 

19 shall be for the use of the Senate; or 

20 (2) such number of copies of the commemora21 tive document that does not exceed a production and 

22 printing cost of $1,000,000, with distribution of the 

23 copies to be allocated in the same proportion as de24 scribed in paragraph (1). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K
FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED 10/01/2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1,000
<CURRENCY>                                           U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                               YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     OCT-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                          OCT-1-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                             1.00
<CASH>                                                    23,874
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            148,270
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                              127,550
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         322,859
<PP&E>                                                   809,058
<DEPRECIATION>                                           511,633
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           724,212
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    109,749
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                     655
<OTHER-SE>                                               309,117
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             724,212
<SALES>                                                  814,226
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         814,226
<CGS>                                                    708,883
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            708,883
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        18,882
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (32,982)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             (12,008)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (20,974)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (20,974)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                (1.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              (1.11)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21
                                                    ----------

                                             LISTING OF SUBSIDIARIES


There are five active subsidiaries of the Company:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                      Name Under which
       Name of Subsidiary            Jurisdiction of Incorporation                Subsidiary Does Business
       ------------------            -----------------------------                ------------------------
<S>                                          <C>                                          <C>
Bontex S. A.                                   Belgium                                       Same

Bontex Italia S.r.l.                           Italy                                         Same

Bontex, Inc.                                   Virgin Islands                                Same

Bontex de Mexico                               Mexico                                        Same

Bontex Hong Kong Limited                       Hong Kong                                     Same
</TABLE>

<PAGE>
#### In the Matter of William R. Gardiner, Assignee of Crossman Company v. Florence H. Rauch. Travelers Insurance Company.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan', JJ.
§ 367.4270 Account 427, Interest on long-term debt. ( a ) This account must include the amount of interest on outstanding long-term debt issued or assumed by the service company, the liability for which is included in account 224, Other long-term debt (§ 367.2240).
( b ) This account must be kept or supported so as to show the interest accruals on each class and series of long-term debt.
( c ) This account must not include interest on nominally issued or nominally outstanding long-term debt, including securities assumed.
vktx-ex103_8.htm



Exhibit 10.3

SECOND AMENDMENT TO 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This Second Amendment to Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”), effective as of March 14, 2016, is made by and between Viking Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) and Rochelle Hanley, M.D. (“Executive”).

Recitals

Whereas, the Company and Executive are parties to that certain Employment Agreement, effective as of June 2, 2014, as amended by that certain First Amendment to Employment Agreement, effective as of September 30, 2014, by and between the Company and Executive (as amended, the “Agreement”); and

Whereas, the Company and Executive wish to amend the Agreement as set forth herein.

Now, Therefore, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual covenants and conditions set forth below, and in reliance on the recitals set forth above, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties to this Amendment hereby agree as follows:

Agreement

1.The second sentence of Section 2(b) of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: “Executive’s target Annual Bonus, to the extent earned, will be thirty-five percent (35%) of Executive’s Base Salary in effect on June 30th of such calendar year.”.

2.The validity, interpretation, construction, and performance of this Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the State of California (excluding any that mandates the use of another jurisdiction’s laws). The enforcement of an arbitration award, or any other action in connection with this Amendment, only may be brought in the courts of the County of San Diego, State of California or federal courts situated within the County of San Diego, State of California.

3.The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this Amendment shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any other provision of this Amendment, which shall remain in full force and effect.

4.This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original but all of which together shall constitute the same instrument.

5.Except as modified by this Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.

[Remainder of This Page Intentionally Left Blank]

 

 



 

In Witness Whereof, this Amendment is effective as of the date first above written.

 


			
	
 
	
VIKING THERAPEUTICS, INC.

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
By:
	
/s/ Brian Lian, Ph.D.

	
 
	
 
	
Name: Brian Lian, Ph.D.

	
 
	
 
	
Title: Chief Executive Officer

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
/s/ Rochelle Hanley, M.D.

	
 
	
 
	
Rochelle Hanley, M.D.
#### § 16.30 Purpose and scope.

This subpart contains the regulations of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) concerning procedures to be followed when the subject of an identification record requests production of that record to review it or to obtain a change, correction, or updating of that record.

[Order No. 2258-99, 64 FR 52226, Sept. 28, 1999]
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 85884 / May 17, 2019

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-18252

In the Matter of

JOSEPH VITALE

NOTICE THAT INITIAL DECISION HAS BECOME FINAL

The time for filing a petition for review of the initial decision in this proceeding has 

expired. No such petition has been filed by Joseph Vitale and the Commission has not chosen to 

review the decision on its own initiative.

Accordingly, notice is hereby given, pursuant to Rule 360(d) of the Commission's Rules 

of Practice,1that the initial decision of the administrative law judge has become the final 

decision of the Commission with respect to Joseph Vitale.

2

The order contained in that decision 

is hereby declared effective. The initial decision ordered that, pursuant to Section 15(b)(6) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Joseph Vitale is permanently barred from associating with a 

broker, dealer, investment adviser, municipal securities dealer, municipal adviser, transfer agent, 

or nationally recognized statistical rating organization and from participating in an offering of 

penny stock. 

For the Commission, by the Office of the General Counsel, pursuant to delegated 

authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Acting Secretary

 

1

 17 C.F.R. § 201.360(d).

2

 Joseph Vitale, Initial Decision Release No. 1345 (Feb. 4, 2019), 2019 WL 446431.
§ 706.412 Submission of statements by special Government employees. ( a ) Each special Government employee shall submit a statement of employment and financial interests not later than the time of his employment. Each special Government employee shall keep his statement current throughout his period of employment by the submission of supplementary statements.
( b ) A special Government employee shall submit his statement of employment and financial interests in the format prescribed by the Division of Management. The statement will be filed with the Division of Management and is accorded the confidentiality prescribed in § 706.410.
( c ) The provisions of §§ 706.406 through 706.411 apply to special Government employees in the same manner as to employees.
( d ) The Director may waive the requirement in paragraph (a) of this section for the submission of a statement of employment and financial interests in the case of a special Government employee who is not a consultant or an expert when he finds that the duties of the position held by that special Government employee are of a nature and at such a level of responsibility that the submission of the statement by the incumbent is not necessary to protect the integrity of the Government. For the purposes of this paragraph “consultant” and “expert” have the meanings given those terms by Chapter 304 of the Federal Personnel Manual.
#### Arthur C. Skinner, Respondent, v. Everett Vail Watson, Appellant.

Motion to open default granted on condition that appellant pay plaintiff twenty-five dollars costs, perfect his appeal, place the case on the next calendar, and be ready for argument when reached; otherwise, motion denied, with costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Putnam, JJ.
### §268. Authority of Secretary to acquire lands for trailheads

#### (a) Authority

Notwithstanding the Act of June 11, 1940 (16 U.S.C. 261 et seq.), the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to acquire by donation, purchase with donated or appropriated funds, or exchange not to exceed 10 acres of land or interests in land, which shall consist of those necessary lands for the establishment of trailheads to be located at White Rocks and Chadwell Gap.

#### (b) Administration

Lands and interests in lands acquired pursuant to subsection (a) shall be added to and administered as part of the Cumberland Gap National Historical Park.

(Pub. L. 104–333, div. I, title II, §216, Nov. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 4112.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The act of June 11, 1940, referred to in subsec. (a), is act June 11, 1940, ch. 304, 54 Stat. 262, which is classified generally to this subchapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996, and not as part of act June 11, 1940, ch. 304, 54 Stat. 262, which comprises this subchapter.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND RULE
15d-14(a)

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18

OF THE UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Quotemedia, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Keith J. Randall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                           |  |                     
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------
|By:                                                        |  | /s/ Keith J. Randall
|Keith J. Randall Chief Financial Officer November 14, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 27 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 27

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed transfer to the 
  United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, and Australia certain defense 
                         articles and services.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the issuance of an export 
license with respect to the following proposed exports to the United 
Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, and Australia is prohibited:
            (1) The transfer of the following defense articles, 
        including services and technical data, described in Executive 
        Communication 1424 (EC-1424) submitted to Congress pursuant to 
        section 36(c) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 
        2776(c)) and published in the Congressional Record on June 3, 
        2019: The proposed transfer of defense articles, defense 
        services, and technical data to support the marketing, sale and 
        on-going support for the ScanEagle and Integrator Unmanned 
        Aerial Systems and for future Intelligence, Surveillance, and 
        Reconnaissance (ISR) requirements for end-use by the United 
        Arab Emirates Armed Forces; and hardware and defense services 
        related to Wide Area Surveillance Payload (Redkite), laser 
        designator, and integration of maritime search payload--Visual 
        Detection and Ranging (ViDAR).

            Passed the Senate June 20, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. J. RES. 27

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed transfer to the 
  United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, and Australia certain defense 
                         articles and services.
```