alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 345.55 Longevity pay. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, an inmate earns longevity pay raises after 18 months spent in FPI work status regardless of whether or not the work was continuous. The service may have occurred in one or more FPI factories or shops. An inmate qualifies for longevity pay raises as provided in the table below: Length of Service With FPI After 18 months of service and payable in the 19th month After 30 months of service and payable in the 31st month After 42 months of service and payable in the 43rd month After 60 months of service and payable in the 61st month After 84 months of service (& more) and payable in the 85th month
Longevity pay allowances shall be added after the wages for each actual hour in pay status have been properly computed.
( b ) *Exceptions.* ( 1 ) FPI work status during service of a previous sentence with a subsequent break in custody may not be considered in determining longevity pay.
( 2 ) An inmate in segregation or who is given a disciplinary transfer loses any longevity status previously achieved.
( 3 ) An inmate who voluntarily transfers to a non-FPI work assignment loses any longevity status previously achieved. An inmate who leaves FPI to enter education, vocational training, or drug abuse treatment programs, however, generally retains longevity and pay grade status upon return to FPI, unless the inmate withdraws from those programs without a good faith effort to complete them. The decision on whether there was a good faith effort is to be made by the SOI in concert with the staff member in charge of the program.
EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF BEEMER, PRICHER, KUEHNHACKL & HEIDBRINK, P.A.
            --------------------------------------------------------
               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into the Form S-3
Registration Statement No.333- 07449 regarding the Dividend Reinvestment Program
and Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-64537 regarding the Stock
Compensation Plan of Whitemark Homes, Inc. of our report dated February 28, 2003
which is included in the annual report on Form 10-K of Whitemark Homes, Inc. and
Subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2002.



/s/ BEEMER, PRICHER, KUEHNHACKL & HEIDBRINK, P.A.
Beemer, Pricher, Kuehnhackl & Heidbrink, P.A.



Winter Park, Florida
February 28, 2003
MDE 

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 

1800 Washington Boulevard • Baltimore MD 21230 

410-537-3000 • 1-800-633-6101 • www.mde.state.md.us 

Martin O'Malley 

Governor 

Robert M. Summers, Ph.D. 

Anthony G. Brown 

Lieutenant Governor 

August 1, 2013 

Mr. Shawn M. Garvin 

Regional Administrator (3RAOO) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Region Ill 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia PA 19103-2029 

Dear Mr. Garvin: 

The purpose of this letter is to submit the enclosed State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

Secretary 

Revision # 13-02 containing Maryland's updated Clean Car regulations that reflect the changes made 

to adopt the California Low Emissions Vehicle Ill Program. The last update to the Maryland 

regulations occurred in 2011. This SIP Revision includes amen9ments to Regulation .02 under 

COMAR 26.11.34 Low Emissions Vehicle Program. Though this package contains all of the 

appropriate California regulations, Maryland is not submitting §2030 Liquefied Petroleum Gas or 

Natural Gas Retrofit Systems from Division 3, Chapter 1, Article 5 of Title 13 of the California Code of 

Regulations, for approval as part of Maryland's SIP. 

An Emergency Action for these amendments became effective on December 31, 2012. The Notice of 

Proposed Action was published in the Maryland Register on November 30, 2012. A public hearing 

was held on January 3, 2013. The action was adopted on February 6, 2013. The Notice of Final 

Action was published on February 22, 2013 and the action became effective on March 4, 2013. All 

administrative procedures were properly followed throughout the adoption process. 

I certify that the electronic copy of this SIP submittal' (compact disk enclosed) is an exact duplicate of 

the official hard copy. If you have any questions concerning this SIP action, please feel free to call me 

at (410) 537-3084 or Mr. George (Tad) S. Aburn, Jr., Director of the Air and Radiation Management 

Administration, at ( 41 0) 537-3255. 

RMS:dhr 

Enclosure 

~ Recycled Paper www. mde.state.md.us TIY Users 1-800-735-2258 

Via Maryland Relay Service
§ 345.35 Assignments to FPI. ( a ) An inmate or detainee may be considered for assignment with FPI unless the inmate is a pretrial inmate or is currently under an order of deportation, exclusion, or removal. However, an inmate or detainee who is currently under an order of deportation, exclusion, or removal may be considered for assignment with FPI if the Attorney General has determined that the inmate or detainee cannot be removed from the United States because the designated country of removal will not accept his/her return. Any request by an inmate for consideration must be made through the unit team. FPI does not discriminate on the bases of race, color, religion, ethnic origin, age, or disability.
( b ) The SOI ordinarily makes assignments based on the recommendation of the unit team. ( 1 ) New workers are ordinarily assigned at pay grade five. All first-time inmate workers shall enter at pay grade five and may be required to successfully complete a course in pre-industrial training or on-the-job training (as available) before promotion to pay grade four.
( 2 ) An inmate who has not successfully completed pre-industrial or on-the-job training remains at pay grade five for at least 30 days.
( 3 ) An inmate hired after having resigned voluntarily from FPI may be excused from pre-industrial training and may be hired at a pay grade based on previous training and experience.
[60 FR 15827, Mar. 27, 1995, as amended at 64 FR 32169, June 15, 1999]
###### Editorial Note on Part 284

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 284 appear at 65 FR 10222, Feb. 25, 2000.

#### § 284.222 [Reserved]
### SUBCHAPTER II—CONSERVATION AND UTILIZATION PROJECTS
§ 701.79 Selection policy for professional personnel. In the selection for employment of the professional staff as a whole, the Director shall be guided by the following criteria: ( a ) Outstanding character and competence—both personal and professional.
( b ) Spread and balance of training and experience in the several relevant professions—ecology; economics; economic geography; engineering; fish and wildlife biology; forestry; hydrology; irrigation; landscape architecture; law; political science; recreation; sanitary engineering; soil conservation; urban and other land planning; etc.
( c ) Diversity of prior identification and experience, both planning and operating in Washington and in the field; including personnel with prior identification and experience with Federal, State, or local government, private enterprise, or university teaching and research.
Exhibit 99.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Paul G.  Lego,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Quarterly
Report of Virage,  Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal  quarter ended June 30, 2002
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information  contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material  respects the financial  condition and
results of operations of Virage, Inc.


                                     By: /s/ Paul G. Lego
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Paul G. Lego
                                         President & Chief Executive Officer


I, Scott Gawel, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Virage,  Inc.  on Form 10-Q for the fiscal  quarter  ended  June 30,  2002 fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information  contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material  respects the financial  condition and
results of operations of Virage, Inc.

                                     By: /s/ Scott Gawel
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Scott Gawel
                                         Vice President, Finance &
                                         Acting Chief Financial Officer

                                       33
#### City Electric Railway Company *v.*Turner.

July 26, 1910.

Action for damages. Before Judge Wright. Floyd superior court.

May 22, 1909.

*Dean & Dean,*for plaintiff in error.

*McHenry & Porter*and H. *M. Henry,*contra.

Lumpkin, J.

1. The petition set a cause of action. The demurrer was without merit, and was properly overruled.

2. The evidence was sufficient to support the finding; and no other ground of complaint being set up in the motion for a new trial, it was properly overruled.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices tionenr.*
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 52 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of S. 3312, an Act 

3 to establish a crisis stabilization and community reentry 

4 grant program, and for other purposes, the Secretary of 

5 the Senate shall— 

6 (1) in section 3051(a) of title I of the Omnibus 

7 Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as 

8 added by section 2 of the Act, strike ‘‘, for use by 

9 State and local correctional facilities,’’ and insert ‘‘, 

10 Indian Tribes, units of local government, and com11 munity-based nonprofit organizations’’; 

12 (2) in section 3051(b)(1)(B) of title I of the 

13 Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 

14 1968, as added by section 2 of the Act, strike ‘‘of15 fenders’’ and insert ‘‘individuals’’; 

16 (3) in the section heading for section 3052 of 

17 title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 

18 Streets Act of 1968, as added by section 2 of the 

19 Act, strike ‘‘STATE’’; 
2 

†SCON 52 ES 

1 (4) in section 3052(a) of title I of the Omnibus 

2 Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as 

3 added by section 2 of the Act, in the matter pre4 ceding paragraph (1), strike ‘‘, or such agency as 

5 the chief executive may designate,’’ and insert ‘‘, In6 dian Tribe, unit of local government, or community7 based non-profit organization’’; 

8 (5) in section 3052(a)(3) of title I of the Omni9 bus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as 

10 added by section 2 of the Act, in the matter pre11 ceding subparagraph (A), after ‘‘State’’ insert ‘‘, 

12 Tribal, or local’’; 

13 (6) in section 3052(b)(1) of title I of the Omni14 bus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as 

15 added by section 2 of the Act— 

16 (A) after ‘‘State’’ insert ‘‘, Indian Tribe, 

17 unit of local government, or community-based 

18 nonprofit organization’’; and 

19 (B) after ‘‘facility’’ insert ‘‘and adopt poli20 cies that focus on programming, strategies, and 

21 educational components for reducing recidivism 

22 and probation violations’’; 

23 (7) in the section heading for section 3053 of 

24 title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 
3 

†SCON 52 ES 

1 Streets Act of 1968, as added by section 2 of the 

2 Act, strike ‘‘STATE’’; and 

3 (8) in section 3054 of title I of the Omnibus 

4 Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as 

5 added by section 2 of the Act, after ‘‘State’’ insert 

6 ‘‘, Indian Tribe, unit of local government, or commu7 nity-based nonprofit organization’’. 

Passed the Senate December 14, 2020. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 52 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

To correct the enrollment of S. 3312.
Editorial Note on Part 0
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

§ 0.27 General functions. The following-described matters are assigned to, and shall be conducted, handled, or supervised by, the Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs: ( a ) Maintaining liaison between the Department and the Congress.
( b ) Reviewing, coordinating and submitting departmental legislative reports.
( c ) Coordinating the preparation and submission of proposed departmental legislation.
( d ) Maintaining liaison between the Department and State and local governments and their representative organizations.
( e ) Consulting with State and local officials and their representative organizations to inform them of Department policy and law enforcement initiatives that may affect State and local governments.
( f ) Performing such other duties respecting legislative matters as may be assigned by the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, or the Associate Attorney General.
[Order No. 504-73, 38 FR 6893, Mar. 14, 1973, as amended by Order No. 623-75, 40 FR 42746, Sept. 16, 1975; Order No. 960-81, 46 FR 52343, Oct. 27, 1981; Order No. 1054-84, 49 FR 10118, Mar. 19, 1984. Redesignated by Order No. 1497-91, 56 FR 25629, June 5, 1991]
### **CHAPTER 27—NATIONAL TRAILS SYSTEM**

Sec.
1241.
Congressional statement of policy and declaration of purpose.
1242.
National trails system.
1243.
National recreation trails; establishment and designation; prerequisites.
1244.
National scenic and national historic trails.
1245.
Connecting or side trails; establishment, designation, and marking as components of national trails system; location.
1246.
Administration and development of national trails system.
1247.
State and local area recreation and historic trails.
1248.
Easements and rights-of-way.
1249.
Authorization of appropriations.
1250.
Volunteer trails assistance.
1251.
Definitions.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GREAT
NORTHERN IRON ORE PROPERTIES BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND INCOME
STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                            364,842
<SECURITIES>                                    8,551,897
<RECEIVABLES>                                   2,569,023
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                7,353,329
<PP&E>                                         38,718,888
<DEPRECIATION>                                 33,433,972
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 17,206,835
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           2,481,674
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                     14,725,161
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   17,206,835
<SALES>                                        10,427,611
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               10,926,213
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                1,572,620
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 9,353,593
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             9,353,593
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    9,353,593
<EPS-BASIC>                                          6.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0



</TABLE>
Martin, Michael (OST) Qgr - C^^NT - QmT ^ ~ W ^ ^ \ 

From: Linda.Gundlach [lrgundlach@yahoo.com] -ry "-"• " ^rCRWiON 

Sent: Wednesday, April 21,2010 9:38 AM ' 'C 

To: EAS(OST) 

Subject: JOHNSTOWN AIRPORT CONTRACT 

I understand from an article in the Johnstown Tribune Democrat that the contract for essential air service for 

both Johnstown and Altoona is currently under review. 

The current provider, Colgan, works with United Express to provide service through Dulles. Colgan has been 

recommended by both airport authorities to have their contract renewed. Other companies are also asking for 

consideration. 

I live in Johnstown and appreciate the fact that Johnstown has an airport with service to a major airport. 

I know the goal is to increase enplanements from Johnstown. 

I would like to inform you of a problem with Colgan/United Express which I feel contributes to travelers' 

decisions to use other airports. 

Johnstown airport often experiences adverse weather. No one is responsible for that. But during the recent 

winter, when reservations went through Johnstown, there was no way to get accurate information about a 

flight's status. 

Instructions were to call United. On calling United and navigating through their automated system with 

departure cities, times, flight numbers, etc. assurance was given that flights were on time. I personally made 

four such calls for one flight during a Sunday morning concerning a 2:00 departure. I was assured each time, 

through an automated voice which was the only voice available to me, that the flight was on time. 

On arriving at the airport, we were informed that flights were not yet landing at Johnstown. We, along with 

several other passengers, were left scrambling deciding whether to drive to PIttsbugh to make other 

connections, drive to Altoona, drive to Washington, or reschedule. 

The flight was able to land and take off in Altoona. So the flight number was active and thus the information 

from the automated system. 

There have been other occasions experienced by family members where Johnstown was not recognized by 

United agents in (then) Pittsburgh. 

I know this uncertainty makes my family reluctant to depend on the Johnstown connection. I suspect that is tme 

of other travelers as well. 

I believe the problem is probably not with Colgan but with United. They need to communicate with their 

Johnstown passengers with accurate flight information. 

If Colgan cannot accomplish this, then I would suggest that another contractor be given the opportunity. 

Linda Gundlach
# C_2011063EN.01002801.xml

| 26.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/28

---

Action brought on 16 December 2010 — Fabryka Łożysk Tocznych-Kraśnik v OHIM — Impexmetal (FŁT-1)

(Case T-571/10)

2011/C 63/54

Language in which the application was lodged: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Fabryka Łożysk Tocznych-Kraśnik S.A. (Kraśnik, Poland) (represented by: J. Sieklucki, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Impexmetal S.A. (Warsaw, Poland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul in its entirety the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 October 2010 in Case R 1387/2009-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul in its entirety the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 October 2010 in Case R 1387/2009-1;

| — | order OHIM and IMPEXMETAL S.A. to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred by the applicant in its action before the Board of Appeal and the Opposition Division of OHIM. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM and IMPEXMETAL S.A. to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred by the applicant in its action before the Board of Appeal and the Opposition Division of OHIM.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: figurative trade mark ‘FŁT-1’ for goods in Class 7 — application no 5026372

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: IMPEXMETAL S.A.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community figurative trade marks ‘FŁT’ and national verbal and figurative trade marks ‘FŁT’ for goods in Class 7

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: opposition upheld in part and trade-mark application rejected in respect of several goods in Class 7

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: appeal brought against the decision of the Opposition Division dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: breach of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1) by reason of a misappraisal of the similarity of the opposing marks; failure to have regard for the fact that the trade mark applied for constitutes part of the name of the applicant company, which has been used long before the date of the application, and is a historically well-founded designation distinguishing the applicant; and failure to take account of the long-lasting and peaceful co-existence of the trade mark applied for and the trade marks cited in opposition.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (codified version) (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
### §1705. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–333, div. I, title VIII, §814(d)(1)(N), Nov. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 4196

Section, Pub. L. 91–378, title I, §105, formerly §5, Aug. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 796; Pub. L. 92–597, Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1321; Pub. L. 93–408, Sept. 3, 1974, 88 Stat. 1068; renumbered title I, §105, and amended Pub. L. 103–82, title I, §105(1)–(3), Sept. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 848, directed Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture to annually prepare joint report detailing activities carried out under this subchapter to President and Congress.
### §1687. Authorization of appropriations

There is hereby authorized to be appropriated not to exceed $25,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, and 1986 to carry out the pilot projects and demonstrations authorized by section 1682 of this title, the residue removal credits authorized by section 1683 of this title, and the other provisions of this subchapter: Provided, That not to exceed $2,500,000 of such amount may be appropriated for administrative expenses to carry out this subchapter for the period beginning October 1, 1981, and ending September 30, 1986. Such sums shall be in addition to those provided under other provisions of law and shall remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 96–554, §8, Dec. 19, 1980, 94 Stat. 3259.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1981, see section 9 of Pub. L. 96–554, set out as a note under section 1681 of this title.