alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER AND N OTICE OF I NTENT TO D ISMISS

Appellate case name: In re Kimberly Marks

Appellate case number: 01

- 15

- 00087

- CV

Trial court case number: 2013

- 73339

Trial court: 310th Judicial District Court of Harris County

On January 29, 2015, this Court, among other things, requested a response by the real party in interest to the petition for a writ of mandamus. The petition by r elator, Kimberly Marks, challenged the trial court’s January 26, 2015 order requiring h e r to participate in regular drug testing in the underlying suit affecting the parent

- child relationship. On March 2, 2015, the real party in interest, the Department of Family and
Protective Services (“DFPS”) , filed a s upplemental m andamus r ecord . Th e record
included , among other things, the DFPS’ M otion for N on suit, because DFPS did not desire to pursue this cause of action, which th e trial court granted on February 17, 2015.

Based on the documents in the DFPS’ record, it appears that this Court may no longer have jurisdiction over this original proceeding because there is no longer a live trial court proceeding. See Allstate Ins. Co . v. Hallman , 159 S.W.3d 640, 642 (Tex. 2005); see also Tex. A&M Univ.

– Kingsville v. Yarbrough , 347 S.W.3d 289, 290

– 91 (Tex. 2011)

. Accordingly, the Court may dismiss this petition for want of jurisdiction unless
the relator file s a written response, citing relevant portions of the record, statutes, rules, and case law, showing that this Court has jurisdiction. See Yarbrough , 347 S.W.3d at 291; cf. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(a). The response, if any, shall be filed within 14 days from
the date of this order

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

 Acting individually

Date: March 5, 2015
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      Exhibit 23
Great Lakes Chemical Corporation and Subsidiaries

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Great Lakes Chemical Corporation of our report dated January 29, 1997,
included in the 1996 Annual Report to Stockholders of Great Lakes Chemical
Corporation.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Great Lakes
Chemical Corporation listed in Item 14(a).  This schedule is the responsibility
of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based
on our audits.  In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to
above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth
therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
Number 33-02069 on Form S-3, dated December 11, 1985, in Post-Effective
Amendment Number 1 to the Registration Statement Number 33-02074 on Form S-8,
dated February 3, 1995, in Registration Statement Number 33-02075 on Form S-8,
dated December 11, 1985, in Registration Statement Number 33-42477 on Form S-3,
dated August 28, 1991, in Registration Statement Number 33-57589 on Form S-8,
dated February 3, 1995, and in Registration Statement Number 33-300543 on Form
S-8, dated January 30, 1996, of our report dated January 29, 1997, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements incorporated herein by reference, and
our report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the financial
statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Great Lakes
Chemical Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1996.

                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana
March 18, 1997
§ 1309.5 What are the rules against age discrimination? ( a ) *General rule.* No person in the United States shall, on the basis of age, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under, any program or activity receiving financial assistance from TVA.
( b ) *Specific rules.* In any program or activity receiving financial assistance from TVA, a recipient may not directly or through contractual, licensing, or other arrangements, use age distinctions or take any other actions which have the effect, on the basis of age of: ( 1 ) Excluding individuals from, denying them the benefits of, or subjecting them to discrimination under a program or activity receiving financial assistance from TVA, or
( 2 ) Denying or limiting individuals in their opportunity to participate in any program or activity receiving financial assistance from TVA.
( c ) The specific forms of age discrimination listed in paragraph (b) of this section do not necessarily constitute a complete list.
( d ) The rules stated in this section are limited by the exceptions contained in §§ 1309.6 and 1309.7.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Fantastic   Financial
Corporation,  on Form  10-QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, B. Stephen Bailey, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 41.6 Determination.

If no formal hearing is had the matter in issue will be determined by the Commission on the basis of the facts and arguments submitted.
§ 20.32 Includable offenses. ( a ) Criminal history record information maintained in the III System and the FIRS shall include serious and/or significant adult and juvenile offenses.
( b ) The FIRS excludes arrests and court actions concerning nonserious offenses, e.g., drunkenness, vagrancy, disturbing the peace, curfew violation, loitering, false fire alarm, non-specific charges of suspicion or investigation, and traffic violations (except data will be included on arrests for vehicular manslaughter, driving under the influence of drugs or liquor, and hit and run), when unaccompanied by a § 20.32(a) offense. These exclusions may not be applicable to criminal history records maintained in state criminal history record repositories, including those states participating in the NFF.
( c ) The exclusions enumerated above shall not apply to federal manual criminal history record information collected, maintained, and compiled by the FBI prior to the effective date of this subpart.
**Exhibit 23**

 

 

Consent of Independent Registered

Public Accounting Firm

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Great Northern Iron Ore Properties of our reports dated February 18, 2011, with respect to the financial statements of Great Northern Iron Ore Properties, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Great Northern Iron Ore Properties, included in the 2010 Annual Report to Certificate Holders of Great Northern Iron Ore Properties.

 

 

Minneapolis, Minnesota

February 18, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

**                                                                                                                                               **

----
#### § 41.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to implement Executive Order 12250, which requires the Department of Justice to coordinate the implementation of section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.

[43 FR 2132, Jan. 13, 1978. Redesignated and amended at 46 FR 40686, 40687, Aug. 11, 1981]
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 86786 / August 28, 2019

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-18534

In the Matter of

JASON A. HALEK

NOTICE THAT INITIAL DECISION HAS BECOME FINAL

The time for filing a petition for review of the initial decision in this proceeding has 

expired. No such petition has been filed by Jason A. Halek and the Commission has not chosen 

to review the decision on its own initiative.

Accordingly, notice is hereby given, pursuant to Rule 360(d) of the Commission's Rules 

of Practice,1that the initial decision of the administrative law judge has become the final 

decision of the Commission with respect to Jason A. Halek.2The order contained in that 

decision is hereby declared effective. The initial decision ordered that, pursuant to Section 15(b) 

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Jason A. Halek is barred from association with any 

broker or dealer.

 

For the Commission, by the Office of the General Counsel, pursuant to delegated 

authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary

 

1

 17 C.F.R. § 201.360(d).

2

 Jason A. Halek, Initial Decision Release No. 1376 (May 9, 2019), 2019 WL 2071396.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 24, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-1175 Lower Tribunal No. 17-26140

________________ Gregory Mirmelli, Appellant,

vs. Harvey Silverman, etc., Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Carlos Lopez, Judge. Lowy and Cook, P.A., and Jonathan Smulevich and Leah R. Rose, for appellant. Genovese Joblove & Battista, P.A., and Richard Sarafan, W. Barry Blum and Joseph B. Isenberg, for appellee.
Before EMAS, SCALES and MILLER, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. See Nat’l Mortg. Ass’n v. McFadyen, 194 So. 3d 418, 419-20 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (citing section 673.3011 of the Florida Statutes, observing that “[p]romissory notes are, by definition, negotiable instruments which, by law, may be enforced by a holder, a nonholder in possession who has the rights of the holder, or a person not in possession who nevertheless is entitled to enforce the note”); § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2017) (“‘Holder’ means . . . [t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession[.]”); see also First Nat’l Entm’t Corp. v. Brumlik, 531 So. 2d 403, 404 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988) (“Failure of consideration is a personal defense which cannot be asserted by the maker of a negotiable instrument against a holder in due course.”); § 673.3051(2), Fla. Stat. (2017) (“The right of a holder in due course to enforce the obligation of a party to pay the instrument . . . is not subject to defenses of the obligor stated in paragraph (1)(b)[.]”).
### §3211. Yukon Flats National Wildlife Refuge agricultural use

Nothing in this Act or other existing law shall be construed as necessarily prohibiting or mandating the development of agricultural potential within the Yukon Flats National Wildlife Refuge pursuant to existing law. The permissibility of such development shall be determined by the Secretary on a case-by-case basis under existing law. Any such development permitted within the Yukon Flats National Wildlife Refuge shall be designed and conducted in such a manner as to minimize to the maximum extent possible any adverse effects of the natural values of the unit.

(Pub. L. 96–487, title XIII, §1324, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2488.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 96–487, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2371, known as the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3101 of this title and Tables.
POWER OF ATTORNEY

Each person whose signature  appears below hereby authorizes and appoints Samuel
L.  Eichenfield and Bruno A. Marszowski,  and each of them severally,  as his or
her  attorneys-in-fact,  with full power of substitution and resubstitution,  to
sign and file on his or her behalf individually and in each such capacity stated
below,  FINOVA  Capital  Corporation's  Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year
ending  December 31, 1999, and any amendments  thereto,  as to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission,  the New York Stock Exchange, and otherwise,
as fully as such person could do in person,  hereby verifying and confirming all
that said  attorneys-in-fact,  or their or his or her substitutes or substitute,
may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

       Signatures                     Title                         Date
       ----------                     -----                         ----

Principal Executive Officer

/s/ Samuel L. Eichenfield         Chairman and Chief           February 22, 2000
---------------------------       Executive Officer
Samuel L. Eichenfield


Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer

/s/ Bruno A. Marszowski           Senior Vice President-       February 22, 2000
---------------------------       Controller and
Chief Bruno A. Marszowski         Financial Officer


Directors

/s/ Matthew M. Breyne                                          February 22, 2000
---------------------------
Matthew M. Breyne


/s/ W. Carroll Bumpers                                         February 22, 2000
---------------------------
W. Carroll Bumpers


/s/ Meilee Smythe                                              February 22, 2000
---------------------------
Meilee Smythe


/s/ Gregory C. Smalis                                          February 22, 2000
---------------------------
Gregory C. Smalis
### §397d. Administration

The Pu‘uhonua o Hōnaunau National Historical Park shall be administered by the Secretary of the Interior subject to the provisions of the Act of August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535; 16 U.S.C., 1946 edition, secs. 1–4),1 as amended and supplemented, and such additional authority compatible therewith as is contained in the Act of August 21, 1935 (49 Stat. 666; 16 U.S.C., 1946 edition, secs. 461–467),1 with regard to preservation of historic sites and objects of national significance.

(July 26, 1955, ch. 385, §5, 69 Stat. 379; Pub. L. 95–625, title III, §305, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3477; Pub. L. 106–510, §3(d)(1), Nov. 13, 2000, 114 Stat. 2364.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Act of August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535; 16 U.S.C., 1946 edition, secs. 1–4), referred to in text, is act Aug. 25, 1916, ch. 408, 39 Stat. 535, known as the National Park Service Organic Act, which enacted sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 of this title and provisions set out as a note under section 100101 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs. Sections 1 to 4 of the Act were repealed and restated as section 1865(a) of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and section 100101(a), chapter 1003, and sections 100751(a), 100752, 100753, and 102101 of Title 54 by Pub. L. 113–287, §§3, 4(a)(1), 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3094, 3260, 3272. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables. For disposition of former sections of this title, see Disposition Table preceding section 100101 of Title 54.

The Act of August 21, 1935 (49 Stat. 666; 16 U.S.C., 1946 edition, secs. 461–467), referred to in text, is act Aug. 21, 1935, ch. 593, 49 Stat. 666, known as the Historic Sites Act of 1935 and also as the Historic Sites, Buildings, and Antiquities Act, which enacted sections 461 to 467 of this title. The Act was repealed and restated as section 1866(a) of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and sections 102303 and 102304 and chapter 3201 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs, by Pub. L. 113–287, §§3, 4(a)(1), 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3094, 3260, 3272. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables. For disposition of former sections of this title, see Disposition Table preceding section 100101 of Title 54.

#### Amendments

2000—Pub. L. 106–510 substituted "Pu‘uhonua o Hōnaunau National Historical Park" for "Puuhonua o Honaunau National Historical Park".

1978—Pub. L. 95–625 redesignated as "Puuhonua o Honaunau National Historical Park" the park previously designated "City of Refuge National Historical Park".

1 See References in Text note below.
#### § 10.10 Public inspection.

Registration statements filed with the Attorney General pursuant to the said act shall be available for public inspection in the Department of Justice, Washington, DC, from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. on each official business day.

[13 FR 8292, Dec. 24, 1948]
#### § 381.105 Method of payment.

Fee payment shall be made by check or money order payable to the Treasurer of the United States. The check should state the nature of the filing and the docket number where applicable so that the fee category for which the check is being submitted is clearly identifiable.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In re Louanne Larson

No. 06-16-00076-CR

Original Mandamus Proceeding

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, 

Justice Moseley and Justice Burgess

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that Relator is not entitled to the 

relief sought. Therefore, we deny the petition.

RENDERED MAY 4, 2016

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
§ 54.525 Fringe benefits. ( a ) *“Fringe benefits” defined.* For purposes of these Title IX regulations, *fringe benefits* means: Any medical, hospital, accident, life insurance, or retirement benefit, service, policy or plan, any profit-sharing or bonus plan, leave, and any other benefit or service of employment not subject to the provision of § 54.515.
( b ) *Prohibitions.* A recipient shall not: ( 1 ) Discriminate on the basis of sex with regard to making fringe benefits available to employees or make fringe benefits available to spouses, families, or dependents of employees differently upon the basis of the employee's sex;
( 2 ) Administer, operate, offer, or participate in a fringe benefit plan that does not provide for equal periodic benefits for members of each sex and for equal contributions to the plan by such recipient for members of each sex; or
( 3 ) Administer, operate, offer, or participate in a pension or retirement plan that establishes different optional or compulsory retirement ages based on sex or that otherwise discriminates in benefits on the basis of sex.
§ 571.51 Definitions. ( a ) *Fine* —a monetary penalty associated with an offense imposed as part of a judgment and commitment. There are two types of fines. ( 1 ) *Committed fine* —a monetary penalty imposed with a condition of imprisonment until the fine is paid.
( 2 ) *Non-committed fine* —a monetary penalty which has no condition of confinement imposed.
( b ) *Costs* —Monetary costs of the legal proceeding which the court may levy. Imposition of costs is similar in legal effect to imposition of a fine. The court may also impose costs with a condition of imprisonment.
[48 FR 48971, Oct. 21, 1983, as amended at 63 FR 4357, Jan. 28, 1998]
§ 55.10 Types of elections covered. ( a ) *General.* The language provisions of the Act apply to registration for and voting in any type of election, whether it is a primary, general or special election. Section 14(c)(1). This includes elections of officers as well as elections regarding such matters as bond issues, constitutional amendments and referendums. Federal, State and local elections are covered as are elections of special districts, such as school districts and water districts.
( b ) *Elections for statewide office.* If an election conducted by a county relates to Federal or State offices or issues as well as county offices or issues, a county subject to the bilingual requirements must insure compliance with those requirements with respect to all aspects of the election, i.e., the minority language material and assistance must deal with the Federal and State offices or issues as well as county offices or issues.
( c ) *Multi-county districts.* Regarding elections for an office representing more than one county, e.g., State legislative districts and special districts that include portions of two or more counties, the bilingual requirements are applicable on a county-by-county basis. Thus, minority language material and assistance need not be provided by the government in counties not subject to the bilingual requirements of the Act.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 929 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 929

  To amend title 28, United States Code, to redefine the eastern and 
              middle judicial districts of North Carolina.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 28, 2019

 Mr. Tillis (for himself and Mr. Burr) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 28, United States Code, to redefine the eastern and 
              middle judicial districts of North Carolina.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JUDICIAL DISTRICTS OF NORTH CAROLINA.

    (a) In General.--Section 113 of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``and Wilson and'' and 
        inserting ``Wilson, those portions of Hoke, Moore, Scotland, 
        and Richmond counties encompassing the Fort Bragg Military 
        Reservation and Camp Mackall, and''; and
            (2) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:
    ``(b) Middle District.--The Middle District comprises the counties 
of Alamance, Cabarrus, Caswell, Chatham, Davidson, Davie, Durham 
(excluding that portion of Durham County encompassing the Federal 
Correctional Institution, Butner, North Carolina), Forsyth, Guilford, 
Hoke (excluding that portion of Hoke County encompassing the Fort Bragg 
Military Reservation and Camp Mackall), Lee, Montgomery, Moore 
(excluding that portion of Moore County encompassing the Fort Bragg 
Military Reservation and Camp Mackall), Orange, Person, Randolph, 
Richmond (excluding that portion of Richmond County encompassing the 
Fort Bragg Military Reservation and Camp Mackall), Rockingham, Rowan, 
Scotland (excluding that portion of Scotland County encompassing the 
Fort Bragg Military Reservation and Camp Mackall), Stanly, Stokes, 
Surry, and Yadkin.''.
    (b) Application.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall not 
apply to any action commenced or pending in any judicial district of 
North Carolina before the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```