U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office

Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800

Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001

94–555 PDF 2015

S. HRG. 114–13 

NOMINATION OF JONODEV OSCEOLA CHAUDHURI 

TO BE CHAIRMAN OF THE NATIONAL INDIAN 

GAMING COMMISSION 

HEARING 

BEFORE THE

COMMITTEE ON INDIAN AFFAIRS 

UNITED STATES SENATE 

ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION 

MARCH 11, 2015 

Printed for the use of the Committee on Indian Affairs 

( 

(II) 

COMMITTEE ON INDIAN AFFAIRS 

JOHN BARRASSO, Wyoming, Chairman 

JON TESTER, Montana, Vice Chairman 

JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona 

LISA MURKOWSKI, Alaska 

JOHN HOEVEN, North Dakota 

JAMES LANKFORD, Oklahoma 

STEVE DAINES, Montana 

MIKE CRAPO, Idaho 

JERRY MORAN, Kansas 

MARIA CANTWELL, Washington 

TOM UDALL, New Mexico 

AL FRANKEN, Minnesota 

BRIAN SCHATZ, Hawaii 

HEIDI HEITKAMP, North Dakota 

T. MICHAEL ANDREWS, Majority Staff Director and Chief Counsel 

ANTHONY WALTERS, Minority Staff Director and Chief Counsel 

(III) 

C O N T E N T S 

Page 

Hearing held on March 11, 2015 ............................................................................ 1 

Statement of Senator Barrasso ............................................................................... 1 

Statement of Senator Franken ............................................................................... 18 

Statement of Senator Heitkamp ............................................................................. 21 

Statement of Senator Tester ................................................................................... 2 

Statement of Senator Udall .................................................................................... 19 

WITNESSES

Chaudhuri, Jonodev Osceola, Nominee to be Chairman of the National Indian 

Gaming Commission ............................................................................................ 2 

Biographical information ................................................................................. 6 

Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 4 

APPENDIX

Letters and resolutions in support of Jonodev Osceola Chaudhuri from: 

Arizona Indian Gaming Association (AIGA) .................................................. 28 

Hon. John L. Berrey, Chairman, Quapaw Tribe ............................................ 26 

Hon. Stacy Dixon, Tribal Chairman, Susanville Indian Rancheria ............. 26 

Ho-Chunk Nation ............................................................................................. 29 

Hon. Robert Pinto, Sr., Tribal Chairman, Ewiiaapaayp Band of 

Kumeyaay Indians ........................................................................................ 25 

Hon. Richard J. Peterson, President, Central Council Tlingit Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska .................................................................................... 26 

Hon. Ty Vicenti, President, Jicarilla Apache Nation ..................................... 25 

Response to written questions submitted by Hon. John Barrasso to Jonodev 

Osceola Chaudhuri ............................................................................................... 30 

(1) 

NOMINATION OF JONODEV OSCEOLA 

CHAUDHURI TO BE CHAIRMAN OF THE 

NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION 

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 11, 2015 

U.S. SENATE, 

COMMITTEE ON INDIAN AFFAIRS, 

Washington, DC. 

The Committee met, pursuant to notice, at 2:30 p.m. in room 

628, Dirksen Senate Office Building, Hon. John Barrasso, 

Chairman of the Committee, presiding. 

OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. JOHN BARRASSO, 

U.S. SENATOR FROM WYOMING 

The CHAIRMAN. Good afternoon. I call this nomination hearing to 

order. 

The Committee will consider the President’s nominee, Jonodev 

Chaudhuri, to serve as the Chairman of the National Indian Gaming Commission. Last Congress, he was nominated to serve as the 

National Indian Gaming Commission Chairman, on July 22, 2014. 

The Committee held a hearing on the nomination November 12, 

2014. The nomination was returned to the President on December 

17th. 

The President once again nominated Mr. Chaudhuri on January 

8th of this year. Early consideration of this nomination, I believe, 

is important for a number of reasons. The position has been vacant 

since September 2013, which is far too long. It is an important position charged by Congress with significant regulatory responsibilities in the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act. 

This law established by the National Indian Gaming Commission 

as an independent agency within the Department of the Interior. 

The full Commission is comprised of the chairman and two commissioners. 

According to the most recent data from the National Indian Gaming Commission, Indian gaming has grown to a $28 billion industry. An industry with this amount of money flow requires the 

commission to be appropriately staffed. 

The commission must also promote integrity and accountability 

through regulation and enforcement. I have met personally with 

Mr. Chaudhuri. I am confident that he intends to ensure these 

principles are carried out by the commission and this industry. 

I have called this hearing so that all our members have the opportunity to hear from and ask questions of Mr. Chaudhuri. I inVerDate Mar 15 2010 13:49 May 14, 2015 Jkt 094555 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 S:\DOCS\94555.TXT JACK
2 

tend to work with the Vice Chairman on moving this nomination 

expeditiously. 

Mr. Chaudhuri, congratulations on your nomination. Welcome 

back to the Committee. We look forward to your testimony. 

First, Senator Tester, do you have any opening statement? 

STATEMENT OF HON. JON TESTER, 

U.S. SENATOR FROM MONTANA 

Senator TESTER. I have a brief one, thank you, Mr. Chairman. 

I too want to welcome Jonodev here to the hearing today. I appreciate you being here. And I do look forward to working with you, 

Mr. Chairman, to move Mr. Chaudhuri out as quickly as possible 

for confirmation. Hopefully we can get you permanently into this 

position, because Indian gaming is incredibly important to Indian 

country. We have seen tremendous growth since 1988, providing 

jobs, providing funding for essential services, infrastructure across 

Indian country. And this Commission that you will oversee on a 

permanent basis hopefully is crucial to the oversight to protect the 

tribes and their members and maintain the highest integrity in 

their gaming industry. 

The purpose of this hearing is to hear how you plan, Mr. 

Chaudhuri, to carry out the Commission’s oversight role while supporting tribal self-sufficiency and ensuring the tribes are the primary beneficiaries of the gaming operations. We need a good person in this position, someone who exhibits good leadership. And 

you have already provided good leadership in this position, albeit 

on a temporary basis. 

You also have an extensive background in Indian affairs, and you 

are highly respected in Indian law and Indian gaming communities. So I want to thank you for your service so far. I look forward 

to your testimony. I appreciate you putting yourself up for this position. I think you will do a great job and be able to continue doing 

a great job once you are confirmed. 

It is good to see your family here. I also note not only a wife and 

two kids, but Legislative Affairs, which is probably feeling like he’s 

part of the family too, right? 

Anyway, thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. 

The CHAIRMAN. Thank you very much, Mr. Vice Chairman. 

Mr. Chaudhuri, please proceed. 

STATEMENT OF JONODEV OSCEOLA CHAUDHURI, NOMINEE 

TO BE CHAIRMAN OF THE NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING 

COMMISSION 

Mr. CHAUDHURI. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Mr. Vice Chairman. 

Hensci, or hello, greetings in the Muscogee Creek Language. 

Thank you for providing me this opportunity to discuss my interest and willingness to serve as Chairman of the National Indian 

Gaming Commission. I am deeply humbled that the President has 

resubmitted my nomination to you. 

If confirmed, I intend to honor the President’s confidence and 

your support by serving the NIGC and the general public to the 

best of my abilities. 

As you are aware, as you mentioned, I appeared before this Committee in a prior nomination hearing four months ago during the 

3 

last Congress. I want to personally thank you, Chairman, as well 

as you, Vice Chairman, for the courtesy meetings that you afforded 

me that provided me an opportunity to sit down with you and discuss my personal philosophy when it comes to regulation. I am excited to expand on my statements from last year and introduce myself to those members of the Committee who are new to this Congress. 

With me today are my wife, Marissa Chaudhuri, and my sons 

Kanuux and Hamati. Hamati is the little one and Kanuux is the 

big one. I am so very grateful for their continued inspiration, perseverance and support. Kanuux, who is almost 8, is here despite his 

criticism that the previous hearing did not include snacks. 

[Laughter.] 

The CHAIRMAN. We note that Grandpop stayed home. 

Mr. CHAUDHURI. Well, unfortunately. 

Hamati, who just turned 5, is here with me today, but he was 

not here with me last year. The last four months have had a slightly beneficial impact on Marissa’s and my trust in him to come out 

in public. We will see how that goes. 

I was ecstatic that my father was able to accompany me to the 

last hearing. Unfortunately, due to the heavy toll that travel takes 

on him at this age, he is not here today. But he is watching at 

home on the internet in support of his son. 

In my testimony last year, I provided you with an overview of my 

personal and professional background and the role that my family, 

both on my Muscogee Creek side and my Indian-American side 

have played in shaping my commitment to public service. Rather 

than re-stating all of that background, let me simply say that commitment to service continues to drive me in my role as Acting 

Chairman of the NIGC, and it is the basis for my continued interest in formal confirmation as Chairman. Please consider my testimony today to be an expansion of my November testimony, which 

I would appreciate being incorporated into this statement by reference. 

It has been my profound privilege to work with and lead the 

highly skilled and committed team at the NIGC. I am proud of the 

work that we have done together during my time at the agency to 

maintain stability in operations and services, while actively 

strengthening the regulatory structure of the Indian gaming industry. Much work remains, however. 

As I mention at every opportunity, I am a firm believer in the 

sound regulation of the Indian gaming industry. Sound regulation 

preserves public confidence, supports tribal self-sufficiency and selfdetermination, protects tribal assets, and promotes a safe and fair 

environment for all people who interact with the industry. 

In various settings, I have repeatedly laid out priorities that I believe are well-targeted to ensure the sound regulation of Indian 

gaming. These priorities include the continued performance of all 

oversight duties, ongoing commitment to training, technical assistance and meaningful tribal consultation, staying ahead of the technological curve, supporting a strong regulatory workforce, both at 

the NIGC and among our regulatory partners, and strengthening 

dialogue and relationships with all relevant stakeholders. 

4 

In implementing these priorities, I recognize the importance of 

adherence to an independent, principled vision of regulation consistent with IGRA. In the performance of my chairman-specific duties, whether approving gaming ordinances, management agreements or ensuring compliance and issuing appropriate enforcement 

actions, I have relied on some key guiding principles. They include 

the need to address and mitigate activities that jeopardize the integrity of Indian gaming and the valuable self-determination tool 

that it represents; swiftly act on anything that jeopardizes the 

health and safety of the public at gaming establishments, including 

employees and patrons; engage in sound regulation without unnecessarily stymieing the entrepreneurial spirit of tribes; and protect 

against anything that amounts to gamesmanship on the backs of 

tribes. 

In the year and a half since I joined the NIGC, I have been guided by these priorities and principles in my efforts to faithfully implement IGRA. During this period, I have been motivated by my 

family’s belief in public service and the opportunity it provides to 

honor one’s responsibility to the greater community. I believe my 

perspective continues to be an extremely strong asset to the NIGC 

and the sound regulation of Indian gaming. 

Should I be confirmed to serve as Chairman, I commit to you 

that I will continue to utilize my experience and perspective to perform my duties in the most fair, principled and practical manner 

possible. 

Thank you for your time today. I am happy to answer any questions you may have. 

[The prepared statement and biographical information of Mr. 

Chaudhuri follow:] 

PREPARED STATEMENT OF JONODEV OSCEOLA CHAUDHURI, NOMINEE TO BE

CHAIRMAN OF THE NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION

Mr. Chairman, Mr. Vice Chairman, Members of the Committee, Hensci, or ‘‘greetings/hello’’ in the Mvskoke (Creek) language. Thank you for providing me this opportunity to discuss my interest and willingness to serve as Chairman of the National 

Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC). I am deeply humbled that the President has 

resubmitted my nomination to you. If confirmed, I intend to honor the President’s 

confidence and your support by serving the NIGC and the general public to the best 

of my abilities. 

As you are aware, I appeared before this committee in a prior nomination hearing 

four months ago during the last Congress. I am excited to expand on my statements 

from last year and introduce myself to those of you who have recently joined the 

Committee. 

With me today are my wife, Marissa Chaudhuri, and my sons Kanuux and 

Hamati. I am so very grateful for their continued inspiration, perseverance, and 

support. Kanuux, who is almost 8, is here despite his criticism that the previous 

hearing did not include snacks. Hamati, who just turned 5, is here as the last four 

months have had a marginally beneficial impact on his trustworthiness to behave 

in public. Unfortunately, my father is unable to attend today due to the heavy toll 

that any travel takes on him now. I was ecstatic that he was able to come to the 

Committee’s November hearing, and I know that he is at home in Arizona watching 

this hearing on the Internet in support of his son. 

In my testimony from last year’s hearing, I provided you with an overview of my 

personal and professional backgrounds and the role that my family’s values and experiences have played in shaping my commitment to public service. Rather than restating all of that background, it is sufficient for me to say that that commitment 

to service continues to drive me in my role as Acting Chairman of the NIGC, and 

it is the basis for my continued interest in formal confirmation as Chairman. Please 

5 

1 see the November 12, 2014 Indian Affairs Committee hearing. 

consider my testimony today to be an expansion of my November testimony, which 

I would appreciate being incorporated into this statement by reference. 1

It has been a profound privilege to work with and lead the highly skilled and committed team at the NIGC. I am proud of the work that we have done together to 

maintain stability in our operations and services during a period of significant transition. Beyond simply keeping the agency running smoothly, however, we have actively worked to strengthen the regulatory structure of the Indian gaming industry 

during my time at the agency. Much work remains, however. 

As I mention at every opportunity, I am a firm believer in sound, sensible regulation of the Indian gaming industry. In addition to being consistent with the mandates of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), I believe sound regulation is an 

essential pillar of support for the critical avenue to self-sufficiency and self-determination that Indian gaming has proven to be for many tribal nations. Sound regulation preserves public confidence, protects tribal assets, and promotes a safe and 

fair environment for all people who interact with the industry. I am committed to 

ceaselessly working to identify and employ all practical methods to support industry 

compliance with IGRA. 

In order to soundly regulate, we need to have the internal capabilities to track 

and adjust to an ever-changing technological landscape. I have taken active steps 

to ensure that the NIGC stay ahead of technological developments in Indian gaming 

and general operations management. Last summer, I worked with my fellow Commissioner, Dan Little, and our senior leadership to use our recent headquarters 

move as an opportunity to virtualize our server environment and upgrade much of 

our hardware and audio-visual components. Additionally, we recently offered tribes 

the option of submitting fees through Pay.gov. These improvements have already 

improved our ability to coordinate with our regulatory partners and safeguard information we receive from them. Soon, we will be able to expand our training and technical assistance capabilities to remote locations through the use of targeted 

webinars and online trainings. 

During my time as Acting Chairman, the Commission has engaged in formal tribal consultations on technology in Indian gaming. Further, in the performance of my 

Chairman-specific regulatory authorities, and as an ongoing matter, I regularly 

work with our compliance and legal professionals to assess whether various proposals and operations that employ unique and innovative technical approaches comply with IGRA. Through input received in our consultations as well as information 

gleaned in our day-to-day regulatory work, I have become increasingly mindful of 

the need to elevate and institutionalize our emphasis on staying abreast of technological developments. 

To this end, we are actively working to develop a comprehensive approach to staying on top of technology developments in the field and utilizing the most up-to-date 

knowledge available in the performance of all agency functions, including our oversight functions, our training and technical assistance, and our internal operations. 

Over the last several months, we have assessed various avenues to implement a cohesive technology vision that cuts across all agency functions. Most recently, the 

Commission announced its intent to develop a technology division that will further 

these efforts. Without significantly altering the overall staffing of the agency, adding 

the voice of a technology director to our senior leadership team will elevate the role 

of technology internally and help inform future agency actions. 

Although we already count among our numbers leading experts on gaming technology, the formation of this division is consistent with my philosophy that the preservation of critical agency expertise needs to be reflected in our agency structure 

and not be solely tied to the good fortune of having outstanding individuals on the 

team. 

At the same time, I believe that it is imperative that we continue to attract and 

retain the most capable and committed professionals that we can. For this reason, 

I am proud that our last federal employee viewpoint survey showed improved results for the agency in 78 percent of the survey’s questions, many of the most significant gains being made in leadership categories. While significant work remains 

to be done, I believe the agency is on the right track in doing what it can to attract 

the most capable individuals to support its mission. 

Identifying all practical methods to enhance industry compliance with IGRA requires an openness to work with and listen to relevant stakeholders. I have previously discussed my commitment to continued consultation and cooperation with 

tribes who, per IGRA, are the primary regulators of Indian gaming. In addition to 

being solidly grounded in the law and consistent with longstanding federal Indian 

policy, executive orders, and our agency’s strategic plan, continued emphasis on conVerDate Mar 15 2010 13:49 May 14, 2015 Jkt 094555 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6621 S:\DOCS\94555.TXT JACK
6 

sultation with tribes and cooperation with the over 5,400 tribal gaming regulators 

in the field is simply the most efficient and practical way for the NIGC to fulfill 

its statutory responsibilities. 

I was proud that the Commission engaged in targeted consultations last year on 

topics that included technology in Indian gaming, and we are actively working to 

implement many of the helpful recommendations received through that dialogue. 

Additionally, the Commission recently announced a robust slate of additional consultations to take place this spring that will help us to further improve our regulatory and operational functions. 

In addition to formal tribal consultation, the NIGC must work closely with other 

agencies within the Federal Government as well as state regulators. While the 

NIGC may not always agree with its fellow federal, state, and tribal regulators, it 

is essential that we have open and frank communication. I am committed to improving those working relationships. 

While I absolutely will continue to listen to all relevant stakeholders, I recognize 

the importance of adherence to an independent internal vision of regulation consistent with the principles of IGRA. In the performance of my Chairman-specific duties, whether approving gaming ordinances and management agreements or ensuring compliance and issuing appropriate enforcement actions, I have relied on some 

key guiding principles. They include the need to: 

• Act within appropriate agency authority to address and mitigate activity that 

jeopardizes the integrity of Indian gaming and, by extension, the valuable selfdetermination tool that it represents; 

• Swiftly act on anything that jeopardizes the health and safety of the public at 

gaming establishments, including employees and patrons; 

• Engage in sound regulation without unnecessarily stymieing lawful economic 

development activities; and 

• Protect against anything that amounts to gamesmanship on the backs of tribes. 

As someone who has witnessed the undeniable benefits the Indian gaming industry has provided to many Native communities, I know the importance of protecting 

it. It is not the job of the NIGC to artificially inhibit growth or the entrepreneurial 

spirit of tribes, however, it is our job to ensure that a strong regulatory structure 

is maintained so that the public continues to have confidence in the industry. An 

efficient, well-functioning, and effective regulatory structure protects the industry 

and promotes its integrity and health. 

Keeping these principles in mind has been quite critical for me in making the 

challenging decisions that I have already made as Acting Chairman, and I am comfortable that they will provide appropriate guidance to me should I be formally confirmed as Chair. These principles directly flow from the mandates of IGRA, and I 

believe adherence to them provides a clear path to sound regulation. 

In conclusion, my personal and professional background has provided me with a 

deep appreciation for the transformative impact that gaming has had for many tribal nations and their efforts to pursue self-determination and economic self-sufficiency. I am honored by the opportunity I have been provided to assist in preserving 

the integrity of the Indian gaming industry. 

In the performance of my regulatory duties, I am constantly reminded of the core 

values that my mother and father shared and championed, primary among them a 

conviction that public service is an expression of a person’s fundamental responsibility to the greater community good. Last November, I discussed specific family experiences, both on my Mvskoke (Creek) side and my Indian-American side that contributed to these values. In the year and a half since I joined the NIGC, I have done 

my best to be faithful to these values, and I believe my personal and professional 

perspective continues to be an extremely strong asset to the agency and the regulation of Indian gaming. Should I be confirmed to serve as Chairman, I commit to you 

that I will continue to rely on these values to perform my duties in the most fair, 

principled, and practical manner possible. 

Thank you for your time today. I am happy to answer any questions you may 

have. 

A. BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION

1. Name: (Include any former names or nicknames used.) Full Name: Jonodev 

Osceola Chaudhuri Nickname: Jon 

2. Position to which nominated: Chairman, National Indian Gaming Commission 

3. Date of nomination: January 8, 2015 

7 

4. Address: (List current place of residence and office addresses.) 

Residence: Not released to the public 

Office: 90 K Street N.E., Suite 200, Washington D.C. 20005 

5. Date and place of birth: January 13, 1972 Tallahassee, Florida 

6. Marital status: (Include maiden name of wife or husband’s name.) Wife’s Name: 

Marissa Janelle Chaudhuri; Wife’s Maiden Name: Merculieff 

7. Names and ages of children: (Include stepchildren and children from previous 

marriages.) Oldest son: Kanuux Auwa Chaudhuri, 7 years old; Youngest Son: 

Hamati Tanagaax Chaudhuri, 4 years old 

8. Education: (List secondary and higher education institutions, dates attended, 

degree received, and date degree granted.) 

Law School: Cornell Law School, Ithaca, NY, Fall 1996–Spring 1999, Juris Doctorate, 1999 

College: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, Fall 1989–Spring 1993, Bachelor of 

Arts, 1993 

High School: Tempe High School, Tempe, AZ, Fall 1985–Spring 1989, High 

School Degree, 1989 

Summer Programs: Pre-Law Summer Institute, American Indian Law Center, 

Albuquerque, NM, PLSI Certificate, 1996 

Arizona State University Summer Math and Science Program, Tempe, AZ, 

1989, Summer math curriculum 

Additional Course Work: Attended ASU College of Law as a Visiting Student 

during 3rd year of law school (Fall 1998 and Spring 1999), and took targeted 

coursework at ASU after college graduation (symbolic logic and an American Indian policy course). 

9. Employment record: (List all jobs held since college, including the title or description of job, name of employer, location of work, and dates of employment, including any military service.) 

Acting Chairman, National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC) Washington, 

D.C.; October 2013–April 2014; July 2014–Present 

Vice Chairman/Associate Commissioner, NIGC Washington, D.C.; September 

2013–Present 

Senior Counselor to the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, U.S. Department of 

the Interior Washington, D.C.; June 2012–September 2013 

Associate Judge, Puyallup Tribe of Indians Tacoma, WA; April 2011–May 2012 

Deputy Public Defender, Maricopa County Public Defender’s Office, Phoenix, AZ; 

December 2010–April 2011 

Managing Attorney, The Chaudhuri Law Office, PLLC, Tempe, AZ; February 

2006–December 2010 

Associate, Snell & Wilmer, L.L.P., Phoenix, AZ; August 2001–February 2006 

Chief Justice/Associate Justice, Muscogee (Creek) Nation Supreme Court, 

Okmulgee, OK; 2006–2012 

Appellate Judge, San Manuel Mission Band of Indians Appeals Court, Highland, CA; 2009–2012 

Appellate Judge, Gila River Indian Community Court of Appeals, Sacaton, AZ; 

2008–2010 

Associate Justice, Yavapai-Apache Nation Court of Appeals, Camp Verde, AZ; 

2005–2009 

Adjunct/Visiting Faculty— 

National Judicial College—Criminal & Civil Jurisdiction, Full Faith & Credit 

(2010) 

Phoenix College—Navajo Government (Spring, 2011) 

South Mountain Community College—American Indian Studies (Spring, 2010) 

Phoenix College—Gaming; Jurisdiction; Practice Court (2000–2003) 

Judicial Clerk—Honorable Noel Fidel, Arizona Court of Appeals (2000–2001) 

Judicial Clerk—Honorable James M. Ackerman, Arizona Court of Appeals 

(1999–2000) 

Law Clerk—Federal Public Defender’s Office (1999) 

Law Clerk—Muscogee (Creek) Nation Supreme Court (1998) 

Law Clerk—Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Court (1997, 1999) 

Law Clerk—Maricopa County Superior Court, Honorable James H. Keppel 

(1997) 

Culture and Enrichment Coordinator, Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation, Fountain 

Hills, AZ, Fall of 1993 through Spring of 1996. 

8 

Sporting Goods Associate (or similar title), Dartmouth Co-op, Hanover, NH 

(summer of 1993) 

Dishwasher, Hanover Bakery, Hanover, NH (summer of 1993) 

10. Government experience: (List any advisory, consultative, honorary or other 

part-time service or positions with Federal, State, or local governments, other than 

those listed above.) 

U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Peer Grant Reviewer 

(2009, 2012) 

State Bar of Arizona, Indian Law Section, Executive Council, Past Chair (2005– 

2006) and Executive Committee Member (2003–2007) 

Arizona Federal, State, and Tribal Court Forum (Overseen by Arizona Supreme 

Court), State Bar Representative (2004–2007) 

11. Business relationships: (List all positions held as an officer, director, trustee, 

partner, proprietor, agent, representative, or consultant of any corporation, company, firm, partnership, or other business enterprise, educational or other institution.) 

Chaudhuri Law Office, PLLC, Manager, Managing Attorney 

Law Office of Robert Lyttle, Contract Attorney, sometimes in Of Counsel Capacity 

12. Memberships: (List all memberships and offices held in professional, fraternal, 

scholarly, civic, business, charitable and other organizations.) 

State Bar of Arizona (Active) 

Washington State Bar Association (Active) 

Oklahoma Bar Association (Active) 

United States District Court, District of Western Oklahoma 

United States District Court, District of Arizona 

Muscogee Creek Nation Bar Association (Active) 

Dartmouth College Alumni Council, General Council and Nominating Committee 

State Bar of Arizona, Indian Law Section, Executive Council, Past Chair 

Construction in Indian Country (CIIC) Executive Committee 

Phoenix Indian Center, Past Member, Board of Directors 

Arizona State, Tribal & Federal Court Forum, Past State Bar Representative 

American Bar Association Death Penalty Moratorium Implementation Project 

Assessment Team 

Arizona Indian Economic Development Breakfast Forum 

Phoenix College Tribal Court Advocacy Advisory Committee, Charter Member 

American Indian Veterans Memorial Organization 

Native American Heritage Preservation Coalition 

Arizona Volunteer Lawyers Program 

Native-POLL-ooza!®, (non-partisan effort to increase Native voter participation) 

Co-Chair/Principal Founder 

National Congress of American Indians Native Vote National Election Protection Program Arizona director (2004) 

INDNS List, Past Arizona director of organization created to identify and support Native American candidates for elected office. 

Native American Community Organizing Project, Community organizer and pro 

bono counsel 

Cornell Law Students Association 

Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy 

Cornell American Indian Graduate Students Association 

Cornell American Indian Law Students Association 

National Native American Law Students Association 

Native Americans at Dartmouth, President, 1992 

13. Political affiliations and activities: 

(a) List all offices with a political party which you have held or any public office 

for which you have been a candidate: None. 

(b) List all memberships and offices held in and services rendered to all political 

parties or election committees during the last 10 years: None. 

(c) Itemize all political contributions to any individual, campaign organization, po- litical party, political action committee, or similar entity of $500 or more for the past 

10 years: 

Contributions to Harry Mitchell for Congress: 3/4/09—$1,000; 9/16/08—$1,000; 

6/10/08—$500; 11/29/07 $700; 10/16/06—$1,000. 

9 

1See the July 23 and November 12, 2014 Indian Affairs Committee hearings. 

Contribution to INDNs List, Indigenous Democratic Network: 10/23/05—$1,070. 

14. Honors and awards: (List all scholarships, fellowships, honorary degrees, honorary society memberships, military medals and any other special recognitions for 

outstanding service or achievements.) 

Dartmouth College Tucker Foundation, Community Service Fellowship Snell & 

Wilmer Community Leadership Award Muscogee (Creek) Nation Supreme 

Court, Recognition of Service State Bar of Arizona Indian Law Section, Recognition of Service as Past Chair. 

15. Published writings: (List the titles, publishers, and dates of books, articles, reports, or other published materials which you have written.) 

Re-Creating the Circle: The Renewal of American Indian Self-Determination, 

University of New Mexico Press, 2011, LaDonna Harris, Stephen Sachs, Barbara Morris, et al. Contributing author. 

Fixing a Hole: Commercial Courts as a Tool for Tribal Economic Development, 

The Arrow (Arizona State Bar Indian Law Section Publication), 2002. 

The Yavapai of Fort McDowell, An Outline of Their History and Culture, 4th 

ed., Mead Publishing, 1995. Chief editor and contributing author. 

A Day In the Life of Tribal Court, The Defender (Public Defender Publication), 

2000. 

16. Speeches: Provide the Committee with two copies of any formal speeches you 

have delivered during the last 5 years which you have copies of on topics relevant 

to the position for which you have been nominated: 

Although I have presented publicly on a number of occasions, including on behalf 

of the NIGC, I do not use written scripts and therefore do not have copies of any 

formal speeches. I am attaching a copy of the written testimony I presented at the 

Committee’s July 2014 hearing on the future of Indian gaming, as well as the written statement presented to the Committee at my November 2014 confirmation hearing. 1

17. Selection: 

(a) Do you know why you were selected for the position to which you have been 

nominated by the President? 

Through my work at the NIGC and the Department of the Interior, I have a proven track record of working with federal partners, tribal leadership, and other relevant stakeholders to carry out the agency’s mission and meet relevant goals. My 

ability to do so has been bolstered by my qualifications and professional experiences, 

discussed below. 

(b) What in your background or employment experience do you believe affirmatively qualifies you for this particular appointment? 

I have served in a leadership role at the NIGC since September 4, 2013, much 

of that time spent as Acting Chairman of the agency. I have developed working relationships with agency personnel, having made a point to meet with regional staff 

at every opportunity. Working in this capacity, I have gained important experience 

and have become familiar with the day-to-day workings of the agency and the policy 

issues before it. I believe that this proactive, positive approach has contributed to 

improved results in a recent employee Viewpoint Survey (2014) for the period during my tenure as Acting Chairman, when compared to the previous year. Finally, 

through the Commission’s outreach at consultations, tribal leadership meetings, and 

industry functions, I have expanded on my relationships with industry stakeholders 

to build on the agency’s goodwill and collaborative relationships. 

In addition, my extensive professional experience has proven to be directly relevant and helpful during my tenure with the agency. My lengthy service as an attorney and teacher in the field of Indian law and gaming matters has given me a 

solid understanding of the Commission’s legal and regulatory issues. My judicial experience has given me a thoughtful, measured, approach to issue resolution with an 

eye toward long-term impacts. My policy background from service at DOI and a 

number of community organizations has given me a full picture of how gaming and 

gaming decisions impact federal Indian policy and tribal nation-building on a national scale. Finally, my volunteer service and my lifetime service to underrepresented communities help me appreciate how prudent economic development efforts positively impact real lives. All of these experiences have given me a deep respect for efforts tribes engage in to improve their communities and an appreciation 

for the role that NIGC plays in protecting a critical avenue for tribal economic development through sound regulation. 

10 

If confirmed, I will continue to support efficient and orderly operations at the 

NIGC, and will ensure that our agency responsibilities are fulfilled in the smoothest 

manner possible. 

B. FUTURE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIPS

1. Will you sever all connections with your present employers, business firms, 

business associations, or business organizations if you are confirmed by the Senate? 

N/A (My current employer is the National Indian Gaming Commission.) 

2. Do you have any plans, commitments, or agreements to pursue outside employment, with or without compensation, during your service with the government? If 

so, please explain: No. 

3. Do you have any plans, commitments, or agreements after completing government service to resume employment, affiliation, or practice with your previous employer, business firm, association, or organization? No. 

4. Has anybody made a commitment to employ your services in any capacity after 

you leave government service? No. 

5. If confirmed, do you expect to serve out your full term or until the next Presidential election, whichever is applicable? Yes. 

C. POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

1. Describe all financial arrangements, deferred compensation agreements, and 

other continuing dealings with business associates, clients, or customers: None. 

2. Indicate any investments, obligations, liabilities, or other relationships which 

could involve potential conflicts of interest in the position to which you have been 

nominated: None. 

3. Describe any business relationship, dealing, or financial transaction Which you 

have had during the last 10 years, whether for yourself, on behalf of a client, or 

acting as an agent, that could in any way constitute or result in a possible conflict 

of interest in the position to which you have been nominated: 

In connection with the nomination process, I have consulted with the Office of 

Government Ethics and the Department of the Interior’s designated agency ethics 

official to identify potential conflicts of interest. Any potential conflicts of interest 

will be resolved in accordance with the terms of an ethics agreement that I have 

entered into with the Department’s designated agency ethics official and that has 

been provided to this Committee. I am not aware of any other potential conflicts 

of interest. 

4. Describe any activity during the past 10 years in which you have engaged for 

the purpose of directly or indirectly influencing the passage, defeat, or modification 

of any legislation or affecting the administration and execution of law or public policy: 

In my capacity as Senior Counselor to the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs at 

the Department of the Interior and in my role at the NIGC, I have participated in 

discussions of the implications of legislative and budgetary policies that could impact those agencies. I have at times carried out discussions with congressional committee staffs on such issues. I have not otherwise engaged in activities to influence 

the legislative process. 

5. Explain how you will resolve any potential conflict of interest, including any 

that may be disclosed by your responses to the above items: (Please provide a copy 

of any trust or other agreements.) 

As I noted in response to Question 3 above, I have consulted with the Office of 

Government Ethics and the Department of the Interior’s designated agency ethics 

official to identify potential conflicts of interest. Any potential conflicts of interest 

will be resolved in accordance with the terms of an ethics agreement that I have 

entered into with the Department’s designated agency ethics official and that has 

been provided to this Committee. I am not aware of any other potential conflicts 

of interest. 

6. Do you agree to have written opinions provided to the Committee by the designated agency ethics officer of the agency to which you are nominated and by the 

Office of Government Ethics concerning potential conflicts of interest or any legal 

impediments to your serving in this position? Yes. 

11 

D. LEGAL MATTERS

1. Have you ever been disciplined or cited for a breach of ethics by, or been the 

subject of a complaint to any court, administrative agency, professional association, 

disciplinary committee, or other professional group? If so, please explain: 

I have never been disciplined or cited for any breach of ethics by any court, administrative agency, professional association, disciplinary committee, or other professional group. In a previous judicial position, I was the subject of a complaint to 

an internal administrative committee that was subsequently withdrawn. 

2. Have you ever been investigated, arrested, charged, or held by any Federal, 

State, or other law enforcement authority for violation of any Federal, State, county, 

or municipal law, regulation, or ordinance, other than for a minor traffic offense? 

If so, please explain: 

In January of 2000, I was ticketed for and pleaded no contest to a charge of driving under the influence. 

3. Have you or any entity, partnership or other association, whether incorporated 

or unincorporated, of which you are or were an officer ever been involved as a party 

in an administrative agency proceeding or civil litigation? If so, please explain: 

In 2011, my wife and I were the prevailing party in a small claims case involving 

allegations of non-payment for our wedding photographs. 

In 1995 my family filed a civil suit for violation of civil rights, invasion of privacy, 

and tortious infliction of emotional distress. The matter was settled prior to trial. 

In 1995, I filed an injunction which was served against the ex-husband of my 

then-girlfriend, who threatened us, and he filed, but did not serve, an injunction 

against me in retaliation. No formal prosecution resulted from these actions. 

4. Have you ever been convicted (including pleas of guilty or nolo contendere) of 

any criminal violation other than a minor traffic offense? If so, please explain: 

Yes, see answer to Question 2, above. 

5. Please advise the Committee of any additional information, favorable or unfavorable, which you feel should be disclosed in connection with your nomination: 

I offer the following additional information to the Committee: 

• I have always enjoyed games of strategy; in addition to winning and placing in 

various chess tournaments, I achieved a United States Chess Federation title 

of expert while in high school. I have played card games, including poker, and 

have won poker tournaments in the past. Since working at the NIGC, while I 

have played on one occasion at a non-tribal casino, I have not, and would not, 

play at casinos regulated by the NIGC. I have always committed myself to the 

highest ethical standards and will continue to do so during my tenure at the 

agency. In this spirit of this commitment, I will forego such activity at any casino during my remaining tenure on the Commission. 

• Gaming has had a monumental impact on tribes that have been able to benefit 

from it, and I appreciate the importance of sound regulation in the industry. 

If confirmed, I will do all that I can to collaborate with tribes and industry 

stakeholders to ensure that the NIGC fulfills its statutory responsibilities. 

E. RELATIONSHIP WITH COMMITTEE

1. Will you ensure that your department/agency complies with deadlines for information set by congressional committees? Yes. 

2. Will you ensure that your department/agency does whatever it can to protect 

congressional witnesses and whistle blowers from reprisal for their testimony and 

disclosures? Yes. 

3. Will you cooperate in providing the Committee with requested witnesses, including technical experts and career employees, with firsthand knowledge of matters 

of interest to the Committee? Yes. 

4. Please explain how if confirmed, you will review regulations issued by your department/agency, and work closely with Congress, to ensure that such regulations 

comply with the spirit of the laws passed by Congress: 

The NIGC’s strategic plan requires it to engage in ongoing regulatory review. 

Given that the gaming industry is driven by ever-changing technology and market 

dynamics, the agency actively consults with tribes and works with stakeholders to 

monitor its regulations. I look forward to a continuing dialogue with Congress regarding industry regulation, and I intend to continue to work with our Office of 

General Counsel and relevant federal partners, such as DOJ, to make sure our regulations comply with the law. 

12 

5. Are you willing to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of 

the Congress on such occasions as you may be reasonably requested to do so? Yes. 

F. GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS AND VIEWS

1. How does your previous professional experiences and education qualify you for 

the position for which you have been nominated? 

As discussed in response to Question A17, I believe my professional experiences 

and education have provided me with a strong foundation for service as Chairman 

of the NIGC. My service as Acting Chairman, an Indian law practitioner and teacher, an appellate and trial court judge, a senior counselor on numerous policy issues, 

and a community volunteer all help me understand how gaming and the NIGC fit 

into broader nation-building and self-determination efforts in which tribes engage. 

Further, my work with federal, tribal, and state governments has provided me with 

a great respect for collaboration and cooperation among jurisdictions to achieve outcomes of mutual benefit. Finally, having worked in a number of public trust positions as well as the private sector—with a large law firm and my own firm—I appreciate the importance of best practices and fiscal stewardship in management of 

a government agency. Together, the above experiences provide me with a helpful 

context for the regulatory and administrative work the Commission performs, and 

I would be honored to continue to use my background to serve the agency. 

2. Why do you wish to serve in the position for which you have been nominated? 

As an extension of my family’s longstanding service to Indian country and the 

community as a whole—my father is a retired political science professor and my late 

mother was a lifelong volunteer on behalf of community organizations and 

projects—I am a staunch believer in public service. 

Further, it is a reality that gaming has had a profound impact for those communities that have benefited from it. I have seen this firsthand in my tribe and tribes 

in which I have worked. Before law school, from 1993–1996, I worked as an educator (a culture and enrichment coordinator) for an Arizona tribe whose gaming operation was in the early stages of flourishing. I was an observer to how that community used its gaming resources to invest in infrastructure, community health programs, educational services, and cultural preservation efforts. Similarly, I saw how 

my tribe and neighboring tribes in southeastern Oklahoma began using gaming revenue to transform opportunities for subsequent generations. 

How a given tribe uses gaming and gaming revenue to pursue broader economic 

development and nation-building as a whole will depend on the needs and vision 

of that community. Respecting tribal sovereignty is a fundamental value for me. I 

believe the NIGC, in cooperation with tribes, tribal regulators, federal partners, and 

states, plays a critical role in protecting the gaming industry through sound regulation and observance of IGRA’s mandates. I welcome the opportunity to do what I 

can to ensure the NIGC continues to perform that role with diligence, professionalism, and respect. 

3. What goals have you established for your first two years in this position, if confirmed? 

As gaming is a technology-driven industry, a priority of the agency must be allocating sufficient attention and resources to ensure that its infrastructure, staffing, 

regulations, and services (i.e., training and technical assistance) incorporate relevant and appropriate technology. I am proud that I have already taken steps toward this goal as the Commission recently launched a series of consultations intended to seek tribal input on how the agency may better use emerging technologies 

to provide outreach and services to tribes. Similarly, I am also proud that the NIGC 

used its recent DC headquarters move as an opportunity to update its IT and AV 

infrastructure. Maintaining up-to-date IT capacity as well as expanding our AV 

training and technical assistance capabilities to serve remote communities will be 

a continued priority for me. Further, I look forward to helping monitor our regulations to ensure that they consistently reflect the goals of IGRA in light of technological and market-driven changes in the industry. 

4. What skills do you believe you may be lacking which may be necessary to successfully carry out this position? What steps can be taken to obtain those skills? 

Through my judicial service, client representation, DOI service, cultural and familial ties, and living and studying in various locales, I am familiar with gaming 

issues and other policy matters facing tribes in most regions of the country. Despite 

having been born in Florida, my exposure to issues facing tribes in the Southeastern 

United States has been somewhat limited. I intend to work with appropriate tribal 

representatives and stakeholders in that region to expand my knowledge of areaspecific issues. Further, I intend to build on my management skills and knowledge 

of the ever-changing gaming industry through continued dialogue and trainings 

13 

with relevant experts. An efficiently-managed regulatory agency necessarily relies 

on a skilled staff with a diverse set of expertise—i.e., legal, technological, operational, etc. Although it is impossible for any agency official, including an agency 

head, to be an expert in all things, good leadership requires an understanding of 

how various skillsets contribute to achieving an agency’s goals and working to ensure that all agency officials work in unison toward those goals. From my time on 

the Commission, bolstered by my experience prior to joining the Commission, I have 

a solid understanding of the importance and relevance of the various NIGC officials’ 

roles. I will continue to rely on available in-house expertise as appropriate, support 

our specialized staff as much as possible, and enhance our expertise as guided by 

continued consultation and operational review. 

5. Please discuss your philosophical views on the role of government. Include a 

discussion of when you believe the government should involve itself in the private 

sector, when society’s problems should be left to the private sector, and what standards should be used to determine when a government program is no longer necessary: 

Overall, I believe the guiding principle of the role of government should be balance. In most matters, an ideal balance between oversight and private action is one 

that at once ensures fundamental fairness and honest dealing while not creating unnecessary impediments to private activity. As applied to the NIGC, the agency’s 

ACE initiative seeks to strike that balance. Through assistance in the form of training and technical assistance, the agency seeks to work with tribes and regulators 

to ensure compliance with IGRA mandates and NIGC regulations. The idea is that 

through earnest effort on the front end, IGRA violations will naturally decline. The 

NIGC takes its oversight role extremely seriously, but sees significant benefit and 

efficiency in working in a collaborative manner to address issues before they become 

serious problems. Similarly, our regulations aim to implement IGRA in a manner 

consistent with the statute without creating unnecessary or arbitrary impediments 

in the industry. 

6. Describe the current mission, major programs, and major operational objectives 

of the department/agency to which you have been nominated: 

As stated in all agency materials: 

The Commission’s primary mission is to work within the framework created by 

the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) for the regulation of gaming activities conducted by tribes on Indian lands to fully realize IGRA’s goals: (1) promoting tribal economic development, self-sufficiency and strong tribal governments; (2) maintaining the integrity of the Indian gaming industry; and (3) ensuring that tribes are the primary beneficiaries of their gaming activities. 

To achieve these goals, the Commission is to adhere to the principles of good 

government, including transparency and agency accountability; to promote fiscal 

responsibility; to operate with consistency and clarity to ensure fairness in the 

administration of IGRA; and to respect the capabilities and responsibilities of 

each sovereign tribal nation in order to fully promote tribal economic development, self-sufficiency and strong tribal governments. 

I intend to continue the gains made in recent years in outreach to tribes and regulators through our agency-wide commitment to the ACE initiative. Standing for ‘‘Assistance’’, ‘‘Compliance’’, and, when necessary, ‘‘Enforcement’’, the agency seeks to 

fulfill its oversight responsibilities while doing what it can to assist tribal gaming 

operations achieve compliance. I believe this initiative is a major achievement for 

the Administration and has led to considerable positive outreach with tribes, as well 

as many states. I look forward to continuing the positive trajectory of the agency 

in this regard. 

7. What do you believe to be the top three challenges facing the department/agency and why? I believe the top three challenges facing NIGC all relate to staving 

ahead of the technological curve. They are: 

Creating and maintaining up-to-date infrastructure. 

Retaining and recruiting skilled experts. 

Maintaining current regulations in a technological industry. 

Each of these challenges stem from the reality that gaming is driven by the market, and the gaming market is constantly developing new technologies for the gaming consumer. The Indian gaming industry is no stranger to this dynamic as tribal 

gaming is responsible for many of the technological improvements in the international gaming industry. However, the ever-changing face of gaming presents 

logistical challenges. As an agency, the NIGC must do what it can to ensure that 

in-house expertise is capable of serving all agency needs, including internal IT and 

14 

information management, ensuring adequate protection in information-sharing with 

gaming facilities and other agencies, providing meaningful training and technical 

assistance, and ensuring that we can sufficiently perform our auditing and enforcement functions. Attorneys and operational professionals who are capable of performing these functions have many employment options. The NIGC has been committed to doing what it can to recruit and retain leaders in these fields. Similarly, 

its internal infrastructure and regulations need to be kept upto-date at all times. 

Ensuring sufficient staffing who understand these issues will be fundamental to 

these efforts. I look forward to addressing these challenges, if I am confirmed. 

8. In reference to question number six, what factors in your opinion have kept 

the department/agency from achieving its missions over the past several years? 

Overall, I believe the NIGC has done well in fulfilling its mission over the last 

several years, and I am committed to building upon the agency’s positive efforts, if 

confirmed. 

9. Who are the stakeholders in the work of this department/agency? 

As stated above, IGRA’s express goals are: (1) promoting tribal economic development, selfsufficiency and strong tribal governments; (2) maintaining the integrity of 

the Indian gaming industry; and (3) ensuring that tribes are the primary beneficiaries of their gaming activities. 

Thus, under IGRA, tribes and tribal regulators are primary stakeholders in the 

NIGC’s work. States also play an important role in regulation of class III gaming. 

The Department of the Interior, especially DOI-Indian Affairs has a large role in 

numerous gaming matters, so maintaining good relationships with DOI is beneficial. 

Other federal partners, such as DOJ and the FBI work closely with the NIGC. Finally, industry operational experts play an important role in Indian gaming, and the 

agency does make an effort to be aware of their perspectives. 

10. What is the proper relationship between the position to which you have been 

nominated, and the stakeholders identified in question number nine? 

The appropriate relationship is one of collaboration, with appropriate boundaries. 

11. The Chief Financial Officers Act requires all government departments and 

agencies to develop sound financial management practices. 

a) What do you believe are your responsibilities, if confirmed, to ensure that your 

department/agency has proper management and accounting controls? 

Given that adherence to the principles of good government is key to achieving the 

NIGC’s mission, proper management and accounting controls by the agency are very 

important. If confirmed, my responsibilities will include working with NIGC staff to 

ensure that such systems are in place so that the agency can effectively perform its 

auditing and enforcement functions in a transparent and accountable way and in 

accordance with NIGC’s statutory responsibilities. As a federal agency, it must be 

held accountable for compliance with all applicable laws. 

b) What experience do you have in managing a large organization? 

As mentioned in response to an earlier question, I have enjoyed serving in a leadership capacity at the NIGC since September 4, 2013. Much of that time was spent 

as Acting Chairman. Further, as Chief Justice of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation, I 

was not only the administrative head of the judiciary of the fourth largest tribe in 

the country, I oversaw the Supreme Court’s management of the tribe’s large bar association. Finally, I have experience working in numerous types of administrative 

settings in the private sector as well as within federal, state, and tribal settings. 

12. The Government Performance and Results Act requires all government departments and agencies to identify measurable performance goals and to report to 

Congress on their success in achieving these goals. 

a) What benefits, if any, do you see in identifying performance goals and reporting 

on progress in achieving those goals? 

I see enormous benefit to having clearly-stated goals from both a management 

and a policy perspective. Such goals help set priorities and motivate all organizational members to work in a collaborative fashion. Engaging relevant stakeholder 

in setting goals also produces buy-in and improves cooperation after the goals are 

set. I am happy to work with the appropriate officials to ensure ongoing compliance. 

b) What steps should Congress consider taking when a department/agency fails 

to achieve its performance goals? 

Should these steps include the elimination, privatization, downsizing, or consolidation of departments and/or programs? There are many reasons why an agency 

may fail to achieve performance goals. It is important that the cause of any failure 

be identified so that agency personnel and Congress can better understand the 

issues and develop appropriate responses. If confirmed I would ensure that NIGC 

15 

strives to meet its performance goals, and I would work with the Committee to ensure the agency had necessary authority to effectively carry out its mission. 

c) What performance goals do you believe should be applicable to your personal 

performance, if confirmed? 

Last year the NIGC published its Strategic Plan for the next five fiscal years. 

That plan contains 5 strategic goals for the Commission that identify key areas for 

performance improvement and reflect the direction in which the NIGC wants to 

move in order to realize its mission. These goals include: 

1. Continue the Assistance, Compliance and Enforcement initiative; 

2. Improve technical assistance and training for stakeholders; 

3. Improve and update the NIGC’s regulations; 

4. Improve consultation, communication and relationship building with tribal 

regulatory authorities, and federal and state agencies; and 

5. Increase efficiency, transparency and accountability. 

If confirmed as Chairman, I believe it is appropriate that I be held accountable 

for the NIGC’s efforts to meet these performance goals. 

13. Please describe your philosophy of supervisor/employee relationships. Generally, what supervisory model do you follow? Have any employee complaints been 

brought against you? 

I am a strong believer in a team-based approach. No employees have brought complaints against me. I believe that my approach has contributed to improved results 

in a recent employee Viewpoint Survey (2014) for the period during my tenure as 

Acting Chairman, when compared to the previous year. 

14. Describe your working relationship, if any, with the Congress. Does your professional experience include working with committees of Congress? If yes, please explain: 

As noted in the response to Question C4, in my capacity as Senior Counselor to 

the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs at the Department of the Interior and in my 

role at the NIGC I have at times carried out discussions with congressional committee staff on policy and legislative issues. I believe that through these discussions, 

I have developed a positive, but limited working relationship with congressional 

staff, including staff for this Committee. 

15. Please explain what you believe to be the proper relationship between yourself, if confirmed, and the Inspector General of your department/agency: 

The NIGC works with the DOI Inspector General’s Office on matters under investigation by that office. I intend to support an open and responsive relationship with 

the DOI Inspector General. 

16. In the areas under the department/agency’s jurisdiction to which you have 

been nominated, what legislative action(s) should Congress consider as priorities? 

Please state your personal views: One area where NIGC strives to adapt to continue to play a relevant role is in meeting the demands of constant technological 

change. Currently, several different bills on Internet gaming have been introduced 

by members of Congress. Some of these bills address the NIGC’s role and some do 

not. The NIGC has heard a variety of viewpoints on the matter from various tribes 

and stakeholders, and I believe it is important to continue to hear from those entities in the future. 

17. Within your area of control, will you pledge to develop and implement a system that allocates discretionary spending in an open manner through a set of fair 

and objective established criteria? If yes, please explain what steps you intend to 

take and a timeframe for their implementation. If not, please explain why. 

Yes. I fully support fiscal transparency. As the NIGC is funded by fees paid by 

tribes engaged in Indian gaming, I am personally committed to being a good steward of such fees. I-am committed to working with my colleagues at the agency to 

regularly review our budgeting process with an eye toward transparency and compliance with applicable law. 

G. FINANCIAL DATA

Information not released to the public. 

The CHAIRMAN. Thank you very much. 

Thank you for your testimony. Hello to your father, who is 

watching on the internet. We will go first to Senator Tester. 

Senator TESTER. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. 

16 

As your testimony pointed out, you have been in this position for 

about a year and a half on an acting basis. Can you describe the 

impacts of having not been confirmed and being in an acting position to the commission? 

Mr. CHAUDHURI. Thank you, Vice Chairman. 

First and foremost, we have had many successes. By and large, 

the agency has been operating to the best of its abilities in a 

smooth manner for the last year and a half. To that, I credit the 

incredible commitment and skill of the excellent team that we have 

at the National Indian Gaming Commission. Many of them are 

here today, our senior leadership is here, of their own accord: Our 

chief of staff and our general counsel, as well as my fellow commissioner, Dan Little. The commitment that all of them have is real 

and it goes to the core of their belief systems. 

But I must say that there is a need to have a confirmed chairman. IGRA contemplates a confirmed chairman, one nominated by 

the President and confirmed by the Senate. It’s essentially a constitutional officer that needs to be running an agency of the NIGC’s 

importance. 

In addition to that, IGRA contemplates a full commission. We 

have done what we could despite having two-thirds of a commission 

in place. But we need a confirmed chairman for stability and for 

the persuasive authority that a constitutional officer provides in 

the chair position. 

Senator TESTER. Could you give me an idea of how many people 

work under you? 

Mr. CHAUDHURI. Numbers-wise, we are a small agency. So we 

have 100 employees at this time, approximately 100. I think we 

just added one very recently. But we work with and leverage relationships with well over 5,000, I think over 5,400, tribal regulators 

in the field. That is why it is so important for us to have positive 

collaborative relationships with regulatory partners. 

Senator TESTER. Can you tell me where your money comes from 

to operate your agency? 

Mr. CHAUDHURI. Thank you, Vice Chairman. We are not an appropriated agency. Our funds come directly from fees that tribes 

submit. 

Senator TESTER. Okay. So you are probably not going to be able 

to answer this question, so I am going to ask it anyway. 

There is a tribe that the NIGC issued a notice of violation to 

back in 2009, long before you came on board. That tribe has appealed that notice but has never received a final decision on that 

appeal from NIGC. I understand there are reasons, but it has been 

over five years. 

Generally speaking, do you have a statutory or regulatory time 

frame in which NIGC is supposed to make a decision when notices 

get appealed? 

Mr. CHAUDHURI. We do. And it is a priority for us to process all 

appeals as quickly as possible. 

Senator TESTER. How long is that time frame? 

Mr. CHAUDHURI. Under our regulations, our time frame for acting on appeals is currently 90 days. The appeal in question I think 

you are referencing was brought well before our new regulations 

were in place. With that said, there have been a number of interVerDate Mar 15 2010 13:49 May 14, 2015 Jkt 094555 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 S:\DOCS\94555.TXT JACK
17 

vening factors, pleadings and withdrawals of pleadings in that case 

at various times. That case is currently in litigation. We frankly 

were poised to issue a decision when litigation was filed. 

We remain poised to issue a decision and very well could make 

one soon. But at the current moment, we are addressing where 

things stand in the litigation. 

Senator TESTER. So I don’t want to put words in your mouth. Are 

you saying that there will or will not be a decision while litigation 

is going on? 

Mr. CHAUDHURI. There very well could be. But the last thing we 

want to do is foster a perception that we are trying to influence the 

litigation. We are very close to being able to make a decision. But 

we will do it in a thorough manner based on an appropriate time 

frame that is specific to the appeal itself. 

Senator TESTER. And in regard to this, as far as Indian appeals 

goes, I appreciate the fact that you think they should be done as 

quickly as possible. I feel the same way you do. I do think five 

years is a bit much, to be honest with you. So anything you can 

do to get that squared away would be good. 

My last question is this, when you talk to some and they will tell 

you that Indian gaming is on the decline and that they have maxed 

themselves out, that they have more casinos out there than what 

can be supported by the population. I just want to get your opinion, 

this will have no impact on your confirmation, but just your opinion. Do you think we have the right number of casinos? Do you 

think we should be encouraging more casinos to be built? Or do you 

think that in fact, Indian gaming quite possibly is on the decline. 

Mr. CHAUDHURI. Thank you, Mr. Vice Chairman. I will give you 

two answers, which are basically the same answer. The first answer is that while I am wearing my hat as a regulator and the 

other answer is my personal opinion. As a regulator, our focus is 

solely on the implementation of IGRA. Expansion or contraction of 

the industry is not our concern. 

On a personal basis, though, I recognize that sound regulation 

helps create an environment for successful business to occur. So I 

believe ultimately sound regulation leads to strengthening the 

agency. 

Now, gross gaming revenue is an aggregate number that lumps 

in all the numbers from all facilities across the Country. We all 

know different tribes are differently situated. Some operations only 

pay payroll and only pay for the jobs that are created by the employees and the folks that work for the facility. Those operations 

are profoundly important to the communities that they serve. 

So I am not so much fixated on the actual size of the industry. 

As a regulator, I am fixated on doing whatever I can to assist all 

operators equally so that everybody has a fair shot at regulating 

their operations in a fair manner. 

Senator TESTER. Thank you, Jonodev. I will just go back where 

we started, Mr. Chairman, I am looking forward to getting this fellow confirmed as quickly as possible. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. 

The CHAIRMAN. Thank you, Mr. Vice Chairman. 

Senator Franken? 

18 

STATEMENT OF HON. AL FRANKEN, 

U.S. SENATOR FROM MINNESOTA 

Senator FRANKEN. Thank you, Mr. Chaudhuri, for being back 

again. Hamati, you are doing great, you are doing really well. I am 

proud of you. And your dad is proud of you. 

Mr. CHAUDHURI. Do you have any snacks? 

[Laughter.] 

Senator FRANKEN. Exactly. 

Mr. Chaudhuri, I have heard some frustration from tribes in my 

State about the amount of time it takes to get NIGC to review applications for gaming ventures. I have also heard that there has 

been some improvement recently. So I want to thank you for that. 

This certainly isn’t an issue that is confined to the NIGC among 

Federal agencies. But some of these applications are very time-sensitive and tribes need your go-ahead to capitalize on economic development opportunities. 

Are delays like that due to a lack of the necessary resources to 

do the job? Are there internal processes that you can improve to 

speed things up? 

Mr. CHAUDHURI. Thank you, Senator. If I may, and I mean no 

disrespect by this, refer to you by the nickname that your two-year 

old grandson refers to you as, from what I understand, which is 

Senator. 

[Laughter.] 

Senator FRANKEN. Yes, correct. 

Mr. CHAUDHURI. I read that somewhere. 

Senator FRANKEN. I see it as more of an homage. 

[Laughter.] 

Mr. CHAUDHURI. Okay. Thank you. 

We are very concerned about maintaining positive relationships 

with the regulating community. And timeliness is part of that. We 

have an emphasis on being responsive at the agency, and being 

timely in our responses. That is why in reference to the last question, timeliness of appeals concerns me. 

Internally, we are looking at all of our processes collectively to 

make sure that internally we have benchmarks associated with the 

processing of any request, be it a facility license notification, be it 

a request for a declination letter, be it any type of ordinance that 

is submitted. We want there to be a uniform approach that imposes 

some accountability to make sure that we are responsive in terms 

of timelines. 

If there have been benefits over the last month, regarding shortening of time periods, I would credit our efforts to look at all of our 

processes and have a clear understanding of where our own internal benchmarks are. But no matter how good we do things, I always want to make sure we do our best to do them better. 

Senator FRANKEN. Last time you were here, we discussed the importance of technology. You brought it up again, you are developing 

a new office for that. I really am curious, just what are the new 

technologies? Where are they being developed? Is this developing 

employment opportunities among tribes, and members of tribes? I 

am curious as to that whole look at the overarching thing of this 

kind of technology. I understand gaming is an industry. So the 

same people who are doing technology, I imagine, in Las Vegas, are 

19 

doing it in Indian country. But how does it work and what are we 

talking about? 

Mr. CHAUDHURI. Thank you, Senator. That is a huge question, 

because technology is a widely encompassing concept. Technology 

touches everything we do at the NIGC. We recognize that staying 

abreast of technology is important when it comes to the training 

and technical assistance we provide. We have to provide up to date 

training and technical assistance. Up to date technology is important in terms of our oversight responsibilities, in terms of being 

able to process audit materials and financial statements that come 

through, with an eye towards how the submissions, what they 

mean given the various platforms that they were submitted in. 

Technology affects our ongoing regulatory responsibilities. We 

have a responsibility to make sure that we provide up to date technical standards when we are requiring compliance in the industry. 

And then finally, internally, as an agency, we have to make sure 

that our operations are technologically up to date. 

In recognition of the broad, sweeping role that technology and developments in the Indian gaming industry present to us as an 

agency, we’ve recently elevated the role of technology within NIGC. 

We are creating a division of technology to be led by a director of 

technology whose voice will contribute to senior leadership’s discussions regarding creating a unified, consistent philosophy and approach to technology. Part of that, I recognize, I know my own limitations. I am personally not a technical expert. But I hope I have 

enough sense to recognize the need to elevate the role of technology 

in the agency and support the technical experts that we do have. 

I don’t know if I answered your question, Senator. 

Senator FRANKEN. You did. Basically what I am hearing, and my 

time is way over, is that this is technology that any business, of 

course, would be using. But I was interested in the gaming technology in particular. But I am way past my time and Hamati is 

looking at me like, don’t take any more time. 

[Laughter.] 

The CHAIRMAN. And he is not the only one. 

[Laughter.] 

The CHAIRMAN. Senator Udall? 

STATEMENT OF HON. TOM UDALL, 

U.S. SENATOR FROM NEW MEXICO 

Senator UDALL. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. 

You have very well-behaved kids there. I am really impressed. 

They are doing well. They are kind of separated from each other. 

Mr. CHAUDHURI. That is the secret. 

Senator UDALL. That is a good sign, too, mom is in between. 

Well, I wanted to ask about your consultation and technical assistance to tribes. I think it is one of the things that under IGRA 

and ensuring IGRA compliance that is really important that you 

do. How do you plan to accomplish this moving forward? Do you 

believe you have adequate resources, like technology and staffing, 

to ensure that the Commission stays on top of the new regulatory 

issues? How do you provide this technical assistance? Are people 

there working on the ground with the tribes? Do you see any area 

20 

of improving in providing consultation and technical assistance to 

prevent violations beforehand, so you get out in front of problems? 

Mr. CHAUDHURI. Thank you, Senator. The ability to provide up 

to date technological information is dependent on your capacity as 

an agency. So your question is right on target and very much appreciated. 

Currently, given our current regulatory responsibilities under 

IGRA, I do believe we have the resources and the tools needed to 

not just perform our oversight roles, but perform sufficient technical assistance. In terms of consultation, any moves that we make 

as an agency, any significant moves we make, we recognize the obligation and the benefit of doing so hand-in-hand with voices from 

the Indian gaming community, specifically tribes who are the primary regulators of Indian gaming. 

Despite the lack of a confirmed chair over the last year and a 

half, we have continued our path toward active consultation. We 

held some meaningful consultations last year regarding technology 

as well as some aspects of management agreement approvals. I am 

personally of the mindset that you don’t want to impose another 

round of consultations without doing active work on previous ones. 

Those last consultations helped lead us to a decision to create a 

technology division within the agency. Further, those consultations 

have led us to some specific proposals regarding updating our 

NEPA handbook at the agency. 

But we anticipate ongoing consultations with tribes regarding 

technology, as well as, bringing folks in house. We already have 

folks in house who can do this. But maintaining the right folks in 

house, who can continue to implement a cohesive technology vision 

within Indian Country, within the Indian gaming industry. 

Senator UDALL. Do you have the capability to send people out to 

a tribe and put people on the ground? Or is more of this, as you 

talked about, through conferencing and bringing people to Washington and that kind of thing? 

Mr. CHAUDHURI. Thank you, Senator. Both. And we actively send 

people out on a regular basis. We have a training manager within 

our agency who works with our compliance staff, with our general 

counsel’s office and other relevant members of our team to perform 

subject matter specific trainings, either in terms of general 

trainings or on a tribe-specific basis. 

So we provide free of cost to a given regulatory body, free of cost, 

we provide targeted trainings in addition to general trainings. If I 

could just mention, we are on pace this year to provide more 

trainings to more people in Indian country than we ever have before. In 2014, we trained more people at more trainings than ever 

before. I have the numbers. 

Senator UDALL. And please submit the numbers to us, if they are 

in your testimony they will already be in. Do you have them there? 

Mr. CHAUDHURI. Yes. For 2014, we trained 2,830 regulatory partners, at 838 compliance reviews and trainings. In 2015, this is only 

March 11th, we have already had 91 training events, training 628 

participants. Thank you for the opportunity to mention that. We 

are very proud of that, as an agency. 

Senator UDALL. And I assume you are trying to get out in front 

of violations and be preventive. 

21 

Mr. CHAUDHURI. Absolutely. That is our whole philosophy. You 

work as hard as you can on the front end to avoid violations; enforcement always being an option and always available. But not 

solely putting yourself in an enforcement box, but putting the work 

in and doing the job to make sure that you are working with regulators on a day to day basis to avoid compliance issues. 

Senator UDALL. Thank you very much. 

Mr. CHAUDHURI. Thank you, Senator. 

The CHAIRMAN. Senator Heitkamp? 

STATEMENT OF HON. HEIDI HEITKAMP, 

U.S. SENATOR FROM NORTH DAKOTA 

Senator HEITKAMP. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. 

Welcome and congratulations on your nomination. I am going to 

come at this a little differently. I think it is really important, what 

you said, that the first line of defense are the tribes themselves. 

I think way too often we think that this regulation is imposed on 

the tribes. Almost every tribe in North Dakota has kind of a regulatory arm to that that oversees the operation of tribal gaming. 

So we have tribal regulation, we have State regulation under the 

compacts, and we have Federal regulation. Obviously I am concerned about harmonization of all those regulations, so we don’t see 

a huge kind of regulatory burden, such as we have to do this to 

satisfy this guy, this to satisfy her and this to satisfy those guys 

at the Indian Gaming Regulatory Commission. 

So what I am going to ask is two things. Number one, how do 

you see harmonization of all those regulatory bodies? And who is 

responsible for making sure that there isn’t inconsistent regulation? Then on the other side, looking at all of these, are there some 

places where you have seen in your experience best practices that 

a State imposed a technological kind of solution that Senator 

Franken was talking about, or whether it has been an opportunity 

to learn from other regulators of Indian gaming? 

Mr. CHAUDHURI. Thank you, Senator. That shows excellent insight into our daily work. 

Senator HEITKAMP. I used to do this for a living. 

Mr. CHAUDHURI. Thank you so much. So IGRA does create a 

multi-tiered system of regulation. Indian gaming is the most regulated gaming industry in the world. We have, as IGRA points out, 

tribes as the primary beneficiaries of Indian gaming, as you referenced, the front line in Indian gaming. You have the Federal 

Government. But based on compacts you have States in there as 

well. 

In addition to being good policy, it just makes sense from a practical fiscal perspective to work with your regulatory partners. So 

we recognize, if you have 5,400 regulatory partners in the field, 

who are the primary regulators of Indian gaming, why wouldn’t 

you foster positive relationships with them as possible? You don’t 

want either side to be playing hide the ball. So avoiding overlap or 

redundancy is very important to us. I think you do that through 

communication, through meaningful consultation, through not creating redundant regulations. We try to streamline both things internally through our operations and externally through our regulations to ensure maximum cooperation with tribes. 

22 

But let me just say one thing just very briefly, Senator. The communities in your State, the tribal nations in your State are exactly 

the type of communities that I want to work harder to serve. Thos 

are rural communities, many of them are smaller tribal gaming operations who I think can benefit the most from our training and 

technical assistance. 

So back to the previous question about what types of trainings 

we do. Part of the reason we are ramping up our technology is to 

provide—— 

Senator HEITKAMP. We are kind of running out of time. But I 

want to refocus you on what State regulations have you looked at 

and said, those are really smart, I wonder if we would think about 

deploying those kinds of State techniques in a broader sense to the 

national regulatory kind of scheme. 

Mr. CHAUDHURI. Well, certainly States have been active voices in 

many of the regulatory tweaks that we have already made, through 

comments, written comments or various submissions. But as part 

of our day-to-day work, we regularly look at State structures. We 

play very little role, we play no role in the development of compacts. Our focus on regulation takes place after a compact is 

issued. 

That said, some of the mechanisms that are often included in 

compacts have been very helpful to us as we have refined our own 

regulations. I don’t know if that helps. 

Senator HEITKAMP. That is fine. Well, we will have plenty of time 

to talk about this. 

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. 

The CHAIRMAN. Thank you, Senator Heitkamp. 

Just a couple quick questions. The Indian Gaming Regulatory 

Act represents a delicate balance, we have talked about it in my 

office, of Federal, tribal and State interests in regulating gaming. 

Provided limited opportunities for off-reservation gaming, which is 

something we spent time on. 

Pursuant to that Act, the National Indian Gaming Commission 

has significant regulatory roles that you would have, including 

issuing Indian lands opinions, opinions regarding Indian lands. Expansive interpretations of Indian lands has contributed, I believe, 

in part, to inter-tribal as well as inter-governmental disputes over 

gaming and trust land acquisitions. 

So could you explain how the Commission balances those interests for determining Indian lands for off-reservation gaming? 

Mr. CHAUDHURI. Thank you, Chairman. Off-reservation gaming, 

we certainly recognize how important off-reservation gaming dialogue has been, not just to Federal Indian policy but to Federal policy in general. That said, our role is largely limited as an agency 

with respect to off-reservation gaming. Off-reservation gaming 

largely involves the process in which land is placed into trust. And 

that land into trust process is a Department of the Interior function rather than an NIGC function. 

We do play a much more limited role in terms of determining 

whether or not, given the parcel, opining on whether or not a given 

parcel qualifies as Indian lands eligible for gaming. But when we 

do that, we are solely guided by the language of IGRA. We employ 

23 

the language of IGRA. So I understand the importance of off-reservation gaming, but our role is very limited. 

The CHAIRMAN. You had spoken about the number of people that 

you have trained and all the activities, and we talked about that 

last time in your hearings and you and I have talked about that 

as well. According to the FBI, fiscal year 2016 in their budget request, that just came out in January of this year, they said they 

had 2,982 pending Indian Country investigations. A portion of 

those investigation sites included, I think, 400 Indian gaming facilities. 

The FBI further noted that limited internal and external oversight makes Indian Country an attractive, they say an attractive, 

potential target for financial crimes. 

Are you aware of and working with the FBI on any of the investigations occurring in the 400 Indian gaming facilities? 

Mr. CHAUDHURI. Thank you, Chairman. 

Certainly we are aware of and appreciative of the role that the 

FBI serves in investigating criminal activities arising out of gaming 

operations in Indian country. As a civil regulatory agency, we don’t 

have any criminal jurisdiction over criminal acts in Indian country. 

However, we do have the authority, as well as the responsibility, 

to refer to the FBI instances of criminal activities of which we become aware. And we do that on a regular basis. 

We become aware of such activities through a variety of means. 

More often than not, from reporting that the tribe provides, a given 

tribe provides. 

So when we make referrals, we refer information that we have 

to the FBI and the FBI chooses whether or not to conduct a formal 

investigation. Once an investigation takes place, our role is somewhat limited because information regarding an ongoing criminal 

investigation is not widely shared. 

The CHAIRMAN. The concern is that if something is an attractive, 

potential target for financial crimes, we would like to try to get to 

the point where we eliminate that being an attractive, potential 

target. So if confirmed, how will you work with the FBI to specifically improve the internal and external oversight, so Indian Country is no longer such an attractive target for criminal activity? 

Mr. CHAUDHURI. Well, I think we work with them on both a regional and headquarters basis. But in terms of communication, we 

can always communicate more. So we are open and in the past 

there have been some regular calls that the agency would participate in, and we still participate in regular conference calls with the 

FBI, as well as DOJ and at times other relevant agencies. 

But I will say that there is, I think there are some accomplishments that come out of those same numbers. Whenever you have 

a $28 billion industry, folks are going to want some of that money. 

I think the real story is how few major, major poster kids there are 

for wide-scale theft. For that, I think you can thank the primary 

regulators of Indian gaming, primarily the tribes, but we do our 

part as well. 

The CHAIRMAN. Thank you. 

Do any other members have additional questions? Hearing no 

more questions, members may also submit follow-up written questions for the record. I would like to move this nomination as early 

24 

as next week. So Mr. Chaudhuri, we may send you written questions this week. You will need a quick turnaround in response to 

any member’s questions. 

I want to thank you all for your time, and for your testimony. 

The hearing is adjourned. 

[Whereupon, at 3:11 p.m., the hearing was adjourned.] 

(25) 

A P P E N D I X 

LETTER OF SUPPORT FROM ROBERT PINTO, SR., TRIBAL CHAIRMAN, EWIIAAPAAYP

BAND OF KUMEYAAY INDIANS

Dear Chairman Tester and Vice Chairman Barrasso: 

The Ewiiaapaayp Band of Kumeyaay Indians is a federally recognized Tribe and 

Ewiiaapaayp Indian Reservation of 5,470.15 acres in east San Diego County, California. The Ewiiaapaayp Band writes in support of President Obama’s nomination 

of Mr. Jonodev Osceola Chaudhuri to be the chair of the National Indian Gaming 

Commission, the federal agency tasked with collaborating with tribes and states to 

regulate Indian gaming. 

As you are undoubtedly aware, Mr. Chaudhuri enjoys broad experience and particular success in tribal government, private practice in Indian law, federal government, and his recent service on the NIGC, currently as Vice Chair and Associate 

Commissioner and formerly as Acting Chairman. 

Our experience with Mr. Chaudhuri was primarily during his service as Senior 

Counsel to the Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs at the Department of the Interior from 2012 to 2013. Mr. Chaudhuri successfully mediated the interests of the 

Ewiiaapaayp Band and the Fish & Wildlife Service regarding a wind energy conversion project located on the Ewiiaapaayp Indian Reservation that involved tribal 

trust responsibility and federal environmental regulations. Mr. Chaudhuri’s expertise in federal Indian law and his mediation skills proved invaluable, and the 

Ewiiaapaayp Band honors Mr. Chaudhuri as a true advocate of collaboration with 

Indian tribal governments. 

Mr. Chaudhuri’s professional background and personal experience, informed by 

the Ewiiaapaayp Band’s direct experience with Mr. Chaudhuri, is the basis for our 

opinion that he is uniquely qualified for the position of NIGC Chair. Mr. 

Chaudhuri’s credentials demonstrate an understanding of Indian country and federal and state interests and the ability to reconcile and balance those interests in 

a manner that is productive for all involved. 

The Ewiiaapaayp Band supports Mr. Chaudhuri as the nominee for NIGC Chair. 

The Ewiiaapaayp Band requests that our California Senators, and all other likeminded Senators, support Mr. Chaudhuri’s confirmation. 

Thank you for your consideration of the Tribe’s views. 

LETTER OF SUPPORT FROM HON. TY VICENTI, PRESIDENT, JICARILLA APACHE NATION

Dear Chairman Tester: 

We are pleased that President Obama has nominated Jonodev Osceola Chaudhuri 

to serve as Chairman of the National Indian Gaming Commission, and we write in 

full support of his confirmation. 

The NIGC Chairmanship is a critical position for Indian country. The position requires a full understanding of the regulatory issues involved in Indian gaming, but 

it also requires an understanding of how Indian gaming fits into broader tribal selfdetermination efforts. Not only does Jonodev understand the gaming industry, but 

his personal and professional experience with his tribe and other tribal nations 

gives him an excellent perspective in carrying out the Commission’s functions. That 

perspective is invaluable to forging necessary relationships with industry stakeholders, and it has served him and the agency well thus far. 

Jonodev’s leadership since joining the Commission has helped the agency smoothly navigate a period of transition—both in Commission membership and agency location—while maintaining regulatory responsibilities and building upon collaborative relationships with tribes, federal partners, and states. 

Jonodev’s commitment to service and his respect for tribal traditions and culture 

are genuine. These attributes, coupled with his solid professional background, make 

Jonodev an ideal person to lead the agency. We urge a swift confirmation of 

Jonodev’s nomination to ensure continued stability in this key position. 

26 

LETTER OF SUPPORT FROM HON. STACY DIXON, TRIBAL CHAIRMAN, SUSANVILLE

INDIAN RANCHERIA

Dear Chairman Tester and Vice Chairman Barrasso: 

The Susanville Indian Rancheria is a federally recognized Indian tribe in the 

State of California. On behalf of the Susanville Indian Rancheria, I write in support 

of President Obama’s nomination of Mr. Jonodev Osceola Chaudhuri to be the chair 

of the National Indian Gaming Commission, the federal agency tasked with collaborating with tribes and states to regulate Indian gaming. 

As you are undoubtedly aware, Mr. Chaudhuri enjoys broad experience and particular success in tribal government, private practice in Indian law, Federal Government, and his recent service on the NIGC, currently as Vice Chair and Associate 

Commissioner and formerly as Acting Chairman. 

Mr. Chaudhuri’s accomplishments during his service as Senior Counsel to the Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs at the Department of the Interior from 2012 to 

2013 speak directly for his confirmation. Mr. Chaudhuri proved to be an expert in 

federal Indian law and Federal Government regulation, and a true advocate of collaboration with Indian tribal governments. 

Mr. Chaudhuri’s professional background and personal experience uniquely qualify him for the position of NIGC Chair. Mr. Chaudhuri’s credentials demonstrate an 

understanding of Indian country, federal and state interests, and the ability to reconcile and balance those interests in a manner that is productive for all involved. 

The Susanville Indian Rancheria supports Mr. Chaudhuri as the nominee for 

NIGC Chair and requests that our California Senators, and all other like-minded 

Senators, support Mr. Chaudhuri’s confirmation. 

Thank you for your consideration in this matter. 

LETTER OF SUPPORT FROM HON. JOHN L. BERREY, CHAIRMAN, QUAPAW TRIBE

LETTER OF SUPPORT FROM HON. RICHARD J. PETERSON, PRESIDENT, CENTRAL

COUNCIL TLINGIT HAIDA INDIAN TRIBES OF ALASKA

Dear Chairman Tester and Vice Chairman Barrasso: 

The Central Council Tlingit Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska (Central Council) is 

a federally recognized Indian tribal government with over 29,000 tribal citizens 

worldwide. Central Council writes in support of President Obama’s nomination of 

Mr. Jonodev Osceola Chaudhuri to be the chair of the National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC), the federal agency tasked with collaborating with tribes and states 

to regulate Indian gaming. 

As you are undoubtedly aware, Mr. Chaudhuri enjoys broad experience and particular success in tribal government, private practice in Indian law, Federal Government, and his recent service on the NIGC, currently as Vice Chair and Associate 

Commissioner and formerly as Acting Chairman. 


311a4.eps
27 

Our experience with Mr. Chaudhuri is through our 1st Vice President who worked 

with Mr. Chaudhuri during his service as Senior Counsel to the Assistant Secretary 

for Indian Affairs at the Department of the Interior from 2012 to 2013. Mr. 

Chaudhuri proved he possessed a deep and insightful understanding of Indian law 

and federal statute and regulation, and, importantly, the ability to forge a collaboration between federal and tribal regulators that forged a common interest between 

parties otherwise at odds. His is a rare skill set that merits his continued service 

in a position of importance involving federal and tribal interests. 

Mr. Chaudhuri’s professional background and personal experience, informed by 

the trust be has earned among tribal leaders such as our own, is the basis for our 

opinion that he is uniquely qualified for the position of NIGC Chair. Mr. 

Chaudhuri’s credentials demonstrate an understanding of Indian country and federal and state interests and the ability to reconcile and balance those interests in 

a manner that is productive for all involved. 

Central Council supports Mr. Chaudhuri as the nominee for NIGC Chair. Central 

Council requests that our Alaska Senators, and all other like-minded Senators, support Mr. Chaudhuri’s confirmation. 

Thank you for your consideration of the Tribe’s views. 

28 

ARIZONA INDIAN GAMING ASSOCIATION (AIGA) SUPPORT RESOLUTION


311a1.eps
29 


311a2.eps
30 

RESPONSE TO WRITTEN QUESTIONS SUBMITTED BY HON. JOHN BARRASSO TO

JONODEV OSCEOLA CHAUDHURI

You testified before the Committee on Indian Affairs’ Oversight Hearing entitled 

‘‘Indian Gaming: The Next 25 Years’’ held on July 23, 2014, that to accomplish the 

Indian Gaming Regulatory Act’s stated policy goals, the National Indian Gaming 

Commission (NIGC) continues to be proactive in several areas, including consultation, ongoing regulatory and operational review, training and technical assistance 

and agency accountability. You noted that successful regulation depends on a properly trained workforce. 

You further testified that the NIGC views training and technical assistance as a 

valuable component to the agency’s mission. The agency views the Assistance, Compliance, and Enforcement initiative as a core of its success over the last few years. 

You stated that in 2013, the NIGC trained 2,751 participants in Indian Country on 

up to date regulations and best practices and in 2014, the agency trained 2,140 participants. You finally noted that these numbers were a ‘‘great metric’’. However, 

these numbers do not reveal how well participants comprehended and retained any 

of the training nor provide a direct correlation between technical assistance and an 

improvement in compliance and accountability. 

Question 1. In what other ways has the NIGC documented or otherwise determined the effectiveness of its training, including measuring a participant’s level of 

comprehension and implementation from these trainings? 

Answer. While raw numbers of training events and participants do provide important data on the breadth of the N1GC training and technical assistance program, 

I realize that solely tracking output is not enough. Therefore, we continue to develop 

metrics for tracking the efficacy of trainings. For instance, the NIGC training team 

is developing knowledge reviews which will assess the retention and implementation 

of training materials not only at the conclusion of training events but also months 


311a3.eps
31 

later. These reviews will allow us to continuously evaluate which lessons and training techniques are effective and which are not by monitoring whether tribal gaming 

regulators and gaming operation employees retain and use what they learn at our 

trainings. 

Training is probably the most critical component of the NIGC’s ACE initiative, 

which is simply shorthand for the agency’s emphasis on working with tribes and 

regulatory partners to minimize and mitigate compliance issues in the field. Although ACE is relatively new, we are already seeing some encouraging signs regarding its impact on industry compliance. For example, data gleaned from Agreed Upon 

Procedures reports (AUPs) shows a significant decrease in both critical and overall 

risk findings between pre-ACE reports from 2009 and those from 2011–2013 after 

ACE implementation began. AUPs are prepared annually for each tribal gaming facility by independent auditors, and they measure compliance with a tribe’s internal 

controls. We intend to track these reports, as well as other relevant information obtained in the agency’s day-to-day work, to help inform and refine our trainings and 

operations. 

I am determined to do what I can to ensure that all NIGC functions are as effective as possible, and I am open to all practical means by which to improve and 

measure the effectiveness of our training program. Associate Commissioner Daniel 

Little and I have committed ourselves to regularly review the effectiveness of our 

training and technical assistance efforts and to make changes as appropriate. 

Question 2. How will you report to Congress on the effectiveness of the Assistance, 

Compliance, and Enforcement initiative? 

Answer. Transparency is essential to our efforts to effectively strengthen industry 

compliance with the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act through fair and practical approaches, and it is important to both our stakeholders and to Congress, which created the NIGC. In addition to being open and responsive to oversight hearings held 

by the Senate and House of Representatives, in order to better strengthen the communication between the NIGC and Congress, I have created and filled a Legislative 

and Intergovernmental Affairs Coordinator position. I believe that this position will 

enhance the Commission’s dedication to transparency and will ensure that the 

NIGC is acting in a timely manner in its responses to Congressional questions and 

concerns. 

At the March 11, 2015 Committee Nomination Hearing to consider Jonodev Osceola Chaudhuri, of Arizona, to be Chairman of the National Indian Gaming Commission, you stated that you recognize the importance the offreservation gaming dialogue has been to Federal Indian policy and Federal policy in general. 

Despite what you view as a limited role for the NIGC with respect to 

offreservation gaming, the NIGC does determine whether a particular parcel, including those located outside the boundaries of an Indian reservation, constitutes 

Indian lands eligible for gaming which is a predicate for gaming pursuant to the 

Indian Gaming Regulatory Act. You indicated that the agency is bound by and employs the language of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act in making that determination. 

Question 3. What is the NIGC’s internal process for developing Indian lands opinions? 

Answer. Indian lands opinions are a service provided by the NIGC to the industry 

and to our co-regulators of Indian gaming. Requests for Indian lands opinions are 

made to the NIGC’s Office of General Counsel (OGC). The opinions typically analyze: (1) whether land is ‘‘Indian lands’’ as that term is defined by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) and our regulations; (2) if the land is trust land acquired 

after October 17, 1988, whether it is eligible for gaming under IGRA; and (3) depending on the nature of the lands, whether the land on which a tribe plans to game 

is within the Tribe’s jurisdiction as required by IGRA. 

In the process of analyzing these issues, OGC coordinates closely with the Department of the Interior’s Office of the Solicitor. The Solicitor is regularly asked to concur in Indian lands opinions. 

Question 4. How do these Indian lands opinions govern the work of the agency? 

Answer. While Indian lands opinions provide the requestor and the agency with 

an analysis of the land’s status, they are not final agency action. These opinions provide a measure of clarity as to the status of particular lands, but the Chair and the 

Commission may disagree with the analysis. 

Question 5. How do these Indian lands opinions govern the ability of an Indian 

tribe to conduct gaming on the parcel at issue in the opinion? 

Answer. Indian lands opinions do not constitute permission for a tribe to commence gaming on a particular parcel of land, nor do they preempt states or other 

32 

concerned parties from bringing legal challenges to the land status. They are simply 

opinions issued by the Office of General Counsel, not the Chair or the Commission. 

Æ