alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dwayne Williams, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 904]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J), rendered August 31, 2004, convicting him of burglary in the third degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he was properly adjudicated a second felony offender *(see People v Parker,*41 NY2d 21 [1976]; *People v Banks,*204 AD2d 473 [1994]).

The defendant waived appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive *(see People v Lopez,*6 NY3d 248 [2006]; *People v Lawrence,*32 AD3d 969 [2006]; *People v Rodriguez,*32 AD3d 481 [2006]). Miller, J.P., Ritter, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 21.1

GERBER SCIENTIFIC, INC.SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



Subsidiary

State or Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or OrganizationGerber Technology, Inc.

ConnecticutGerber Technology, Ltd.

CanadaGerber Technology Pty., Ltd.

AustraliaGerber Technology, Ltd.

Hong KongGGT International de Mexico, SA de CV

MexicoGerber Technology GmbH

GermanyGerber Technology S.R.L.

ItalyGerber Technology NV/SA

BelgiumGerber Technology SARL

FranceGerber Technology Aktiebalag

SwedenGerber Technology, Ltd.

United KingdomGerber Technology A/S

DenmarkGerber Technology LDA

PortugalGerber Technology Venture Company

ConnecticutShanghai Gerber Technology Service, Inc.

ChinaGerbertec Maroc SARL

MoroccoGerber Scientific Products, Inc.

ConnecticutGerber Coburn Optical, Inc.

DelawareGerber Coburn Optical (Australia) Pty., Ltd.

AustraliaGerber Coburn Optical (Singapore) Pte., Ltd.

SingaporeGerber Coburn Optical (U.K.), Ltd.

United KingdomStereo Optical Company, Inc.

IllinoisGerber Coburn Optical International, Inc.

DelawareGerber Coburn Optical of Canada, Ltd.

CanadaSpandex PLC

United KingdomH. Brunner GmbH

GermanyUltramark Adhesive Products Ltd.

United KingdomSpandex Benelux NV SA

BelgiumSpandex France SA

FranceSpandex AG

SwitzerlandSpandex Kft

HungarySpandex Syndicut Sro

Czech RepublicSpandex Benelux BV

HollandSpandex Espana SA

SpainSpandex Srl

ItalyND Graphic Products Ltd.

CanadaND Graphics Ltd.

CanadaSpandex GmbH

AustriaSpandex Unifol Sro

SlovakiaSD Trading OY

FinlandLars Lindquist Trading AB

SwedenSpandex Asia Pacific Pty. Ltd.

AustraliaSpandex Asia Pacific Ltd.

New ZealandR&D Marketing Aktiebolag

SwedenSpandex Suomi OY

Finland928395 Ontario, Inc.

CanadaGerber Venture Capital Corporation

DelawareGerber Scientific UK Ltd.

United KingdomGerber Foreign Sales Corporation

Barbados


Other subsidiaries, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary as of April 30, 2001 and are not listed above.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136447 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136447 

 COA: 283037 

St. Clair CC: 03-001253-FC 

SCOTT GERALD MARTIN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 21, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 65 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.J.Res.65

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twenty

                            Joint Resolution

 
Providing for the reappointment of John Fahey as a citizen regent of the 
            Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the 
Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other 
than Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the expiration of the 
term of John Fahey of Massachusetts on February 20, 2020, is filled by 
the reappointment of the incumbent. The reappointment is for a term of 
six years, beginning on the later of February 20, 2020, or the date of 
the enactment of this joint resolution.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
1 

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-21-00306-CR

__________________

RAYMUNDO BERMUDEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 14-18677

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 Raymundo Bermudez appeals his conviction for assaulting a public 

servant, a third-degree felony.1 After filing the notice of appeal,the trial 

court appointed an attorney to represent Bermudez in his appeal. The 

attorney discharged his responsibilities to Bermudez by filing and Anders

1See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.01(b)(1).
2

brief.2 In the brief, Bermudez’s attorney represents there are no arguable 

reversible errors to be addressed in Bermudez’s appeal.3 The brief the 

attorney filed contains a professional evaluation of the record. In the 

brief, Bermudez’s attorney explains why, under the record in Bermudez’s 

case, no arguable issues exist to reverse the trial court’s judgment.4

Bermudez’s attorney also represented that he sent Bermudez a copy of 

the brief and the record. When the brief was filed, the Clerk of the Ninth 

Court of Appeals notified Bermudez, by letter, that he could file a pro se 

brief or response with the Court on or before March 21, 2022.Bermudez, 

however, failed to respond.

When an attorney files an Anders brief, we are required to 

independently examine the record and determine whether the attorney 

assigned to represent the defendant has a non-frivolous argument that 

would support the appeal.5 After reviewing the clerk’s record, the 

reporter’s record, and the attorney’s brief, we agree there are no arguable 

2See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967).

3See id.; High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

4Id. 5Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988) (citing Anders, 386 U.S. at 

744).
3

grounds to support the appeal. Thus, it follows the appeal is frivolous.6

For that reason, we need not require the trial court to appoint another 

attorney to re-brief the appeal.7

The trial court’s judgmentis affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

_________________________

 HOLLIS HORTON

 Justice

Submitted on September 14, 2022

Opinion Delivered September 28, 2022

Do Not Publish 

Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.

6See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827-28 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2005) (“Due to the nature of Anders briefs, by indicating in the opinion 

that it considered the issues raised in the briefs and reviewed the record 

for reversible error but found none, the court of appeals met the 

requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 47.1.”).

7See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).

Bermudez may challenge our decision in the case by filing a petition for 

discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.
FEDERAL CUSTODY AND CONTROL FORM (CCF) SUPPLIERS

Date: June 2013

This list provides several sources where the Federal Custody and Control Form can be purchased. The 

Division of Workplace Programs is providing this information as a courtesy and does not consider this an 

endorsement of any supplier. Any supplier interested in having its name added to the list below should contact 

Giselle Hersh at giselle.hersh@samhsa.hhs.gov.

American Solutions for Business JK Data Corporation

901 Penamint Court 1807 4th Street

Chanhassen, MN 55317 Santa Rosa, CA 95404

Phone: 952-470-1020 Phone: 800-669-0806

Fax: 952-470-5820 Fax: 707-577-0660

Contact: Kathy Petrick Contact: John Graves

Email: KathyPetrick@msn.com Email: john@jkdatacorp.com

Website: http://www.JKdatacorp.com

Atlantic Business Forms, Inc.

1520 Ednam Forest Drive Lab Documents

Richmond, VA 23238-4903 1911 Vernon Street

Phone: 804-741-0537 N. Kansas City, MO 64116

Cell phone: Dan Redfearn 804-229-5854 Phone: 800-574-9033 and 816-584-9033

Cell phone: Becky Redfearn 804-229-5895 Fax: 816-54-9034

Fax: 804-741-0538 Contact: Michelle Maddox

Contact: Dan and Becky Redfearn Email: mmaddox@mindspring.com

Email: atlanticbf@msn.com

LabMedia Partners

Burris Computer Forms A Division of Print Management Partners

PO Box 21502 4330 Shawnee Mission Parkway

Roanoke, VA 24018 Suite 300

Phone: 540-989-4210 Fairway, KS 66205

800-982-FORM (3676) Phone: 877-822-4333 and 913-432-4333 x-1200

Fax: 540-989-8273 Fax: 913-831-0436

Contact: Jerry Guzi Contact: Steve Palma

Email: jerry@pcforms.com Email: steve.palma@ourpartners.com

Website: http://www.pcforms.com Website: http://www.labmediapartners.com

JBF Print Standard Register Company

1125 Old Brandon Road Lab Solution Group

Flowood, MS 39232 899 Mountain Ave.

Phone: 800-530-7500 x-225 Suite 2F

Fax: 601-936-9354 Springfield, NJ 07081

Contact: Deborah Kilbourne Phone: 800-254-8681

Email: dkilbourne@jbfprint.com Fax: 800-255-6044

Contact: Kevin Witte

J.J. Keller & Associates, Inc. Email: labsolutionsgroup@standardregister.com 

3003 W. Breezewood Lane Email: kevin.witte@standardregister.com 

P.O. Box 368

Neenah, WI 54957-9917

Phone: 800-327-6868

Contact: Charles Richards

Email: crichards@jjkeller.com

Website: http://www.jjkeller.com
ex10-3.htm


Exhibit 10.3

 

BILL OF SALE

 

In accordance with the provisions of that certain Asset Purchase Agreement, made and dated as of March 9, 2016 (the “Purchase Agreement”), by and among Time Warner Cable Enterprises LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Buyer”), Towerstream I, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Company”), and Towerstream Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Parent”), Company and Parent do hereby execute and deliver this Bill of Sale. Capitalized terms, unless otherwise defined herein, have the meanings assigned to them in the Purchase Agreement.

 

For consideration recited in the Purchase Agreement and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Company hereby sells, assigns, transfers, delivers, and conveys to Buyer, free and clear of all Encumbrances, all right, title and interest in and to the Assets.

 

Company agrees that from time to time, whether on or after the date hereof, it will execute and deliver such other documents and take such other actions as may reasonably be requested in writing by Buyer and required to distribute and convey more effectively the Assets from Company to Buyer.

 

The identity and content of the Assets, and the representations and warranties of Company and Owner applicable to the Assets, together with all limitations, restrictions, disclaimers and other provisions thereof, are contained in the Purchase Agreement.

 

THIS BILL OF SALE DOES NOT, NOR SHALL IT BE DEEMED TO, SUPERSEDE, SUPPLANT, EXTINGUISH, MERGE OR EXPAND ANY OF THE REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES, COVENANTS, INDEMNITIES OR LIMITATIONS CONTAINED IN THE PURCHASE AGREEMENT.

 

This Bill of Sale shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York, without regard to any choice or conflicts of law provision or rule (whether of the State of New York or any other jurisdiction) that would cause the application of the laws of any other jurisdiction. 

 

Delivery of a signature page to this Bill of Sale by facsimile or other electronic means (e.g., electronic mail or PDF) shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart to this Bill of Sale.

 

[signature page follows]

 


 

PAGE 1 




 


 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Bill of Sale to be executed by its duly authorized officer to be effective as of the 9 day of March, 2016.

 

 

	  	
COMPANY:

	  	  
	  	
TOWERSTREAM I., INC.,

	  	
a Delaware corporation

	  	  
	  	  
	  	
By:  /s/ Philip Urso                                                                           

	  	
Name: Philip Urso

	  	
Title: Sole Officer

	  	
 

	 	 
	  	
PARENT:

	  	  
	  	
TOWERSTREAM CORPORATION,

	  	
a Delaware corporation

	  	  
	  	  
	  	
By:  /s/ Philip Urso                                                                           

	  	
Name: Philip Urso

	  	
Title: Interim CEO

	  	  


 

 

BILL OF SALE:

TOWERSTREAM CORPORATION AND TOWERSTREAM I, INC. 

SIGNATURE PAGE
6 ft

Make sure your face is 

at least 6 feet away

from others.

Sleep head to toe. Wear a mask when not

on your bed or mat.

How You can Protect Others from COVID-19 

in Shelters: In General Sleeping Areas

6 ft

CS 318294-A 08/09/2020

cdc.gov/coronavirus
§ 512.13 Institutional Review Board. ( a ) The Bureau of Prisons' central institutional review board shall be called the Bureau Research Review Board (BRRB). It shall consist of the Chief, ORE, at least four other members, and one alternate, appointed by the Director, and shall meet a sufficient number of times to insure that each project covered by 28 CFR part 46 receives an annual review. A majority of members shall not be Bureau employees. The BRRB shall include an individual with legal expertise and a representative for inmates whom the Director determines is able to identify with inmate concerns and evaluate objectively a research proposal's impact on, and relevance to, inmates and to the correctional process.
( b ) The Chief, ORE, shall serve as chairperson of the BRRB. If a potential conflict of interest exists for the BRRB chairperson on a particular research proposal, the Assistant Director, Information, Policy, and Public Affairs Division, shall appoint another individual to serve as chairperson on matters pertaining to that project.
#### § 2.5 Sentence aggregation.

When multiple sentences are aggregated by the Bureau of Prisons pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4161 and 4205, such sentences are treated as a single aggregate sentence for the purpose of every action taken by the Commission pursuant to these rules, and the prisoner has a single parole eligibility date as determined by the Bureau of Prisons.

[45 FR 44925, July 2, 1980]
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 23:  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


To the Stockholder and Board of Directors of Harris Bankcorp, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-28909 on Form S-3 of Harris Bankcorp, Inc. of our report dated January 29,
2001 relating to the consolidated statements of condition of Harris Bankcorp,
Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related
consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in
stockholder's equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three year
period ended December 31, 2000, which report appears in the December 31, 2000
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Harris Bankcorp, Inc.





KPMG LLP                                             PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 23, 2001
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________

NO. 09-15-00521-CR

________________

WILSON BARRON COLEMAN IV, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 298460

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On March 22, 2016, we notified the parties that the appeal would be 

dismissed for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the 

record or the appellant explained why he needed time for filing the record. The 

appellant did not file a response. It appears that the appellant is not entitled to 

proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.2. There being no 

satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, the appeal is dismissed for 

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).
2

APPEAL DISMISSED.

________________________________

 STEVE McKEITHEN 

 Chief Justice

 

Submitted on May 10, 2016

Opinion Delivered May 11, 2016

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
### §3472. Conservation tillage; Congressional findings, etc.

(a) Congress finds that—

(1) domestic and international demand for agricultural products from the United States is great and is expected to significantly increase over the next twenty years;

(2) the ability of the United States to provide agricultural products to meet that demand is seriously impaired by the annual loss of five billion tons of soil due to wind and water erosion;

(3) the battle against soil erosion is being lost despite the annual expenditure of millions of dollars by the Federal Government on research, technical assistance, and conservation incentives to control soil erosion;

(4) conservation tillage practices are estimated to reduce soil erosion by 50 to 90 per centum over conventional farming practices; and

(5) conservation tillage may result in better yields, greater land use flexibility, decreased fuel use, decreased labor and equipment costs, increased retention of soil moisture, and more productive land than conventional farming practices and may be adaptable to a broad range of soil types and slopes throughout the country.

(b) It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Agriculture should, and is hereby urged and requested to—

(1) direct the attention of our Nation's farmers to the costs and benefits of conservation tillage as a means of controlling soil erosion and improving profitability; and

(2) conduct a program of research designed to resolve any unanswered questions regarding the advantages and disadvantages of conservation tillage over other soil conservation practices.

(Pub. L. 97–98, title XV, §1553, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1345.)
§ 345.80 General. As earnings permit, FPI provides appropriate training for inmates which is directly related to the inmate worker's job assignment. Additionally, FPI administers a scholarship program to provide inmates with an opportunity to begin, or to continue with business and industry courses or vocational training. ( a ) An applicant for FPI-funded training programs should be evaluated to determine sufficient interest and preparation to successfully complete the course content. The evaluation may be done by the Education Department, unit team, or other qualified personnel.
( b ) An inmate selected to participate in FPI-funded training programs ordinarily must have enough sentence time remaining to serve to complete the training.
#### § 45.7 Form of application; filing procedure.

Applications, supplemental applications, statements of supplemental information, notices of change, and reports should be filed with the Secretary of the Commission in accordance with filing procedures posted on the Commission's Web site at *http://www.ferc.gov.* Each filing must be dated, signed by the applicant, and verified under oath in accordance with § 385.2005(b) and (c).

[Order 737, 75 FR 43404, July 26, 2010]
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Teleconnect Inc. (the
“Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company each hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





October
13, 2009





By:
                    /s/ Dirk Benschop
                    
                    By:
                    /s/ Alfonso de BorbonDirk
      Benschop, Director,
                    
                    
                    Alfonso
      de Borbon,Chief
      Executive Officer,
                    
                    
                    Director,
      Chief AccountingPresident,
      and Treasurer
                    
                    
                    and
      Financial Officer,Executive
      Vice President andChief
      Operating Officer