alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### John H. Merchant, appellee, v. Anthony Baumeister et al., appellants.

Filed March 5, 1902.

No. 11,402.

Confirmation: Appeal: Inadequate Appraisement.

Appeal from the district court for Douglas county. Heard below before Scott, J.

Affirmed.

*A. N. Ferguson,*for appellants.

*Decoter L. Thomas, contra.*

Holcomb, J.

From an order of confirmation of a sale of real estate in foreclosure proceedings, defendants appeal, presenting *92for our consideration only the alleged inadequacy of the appraisement made, which it is contended is so much below the true value as to be presumptively fraudulent. No actual fraud is charged or attempted to be proved. Several affidavits which are preserved by a bill of exceptions were fthed in support of and against the appraisement as made by the officers acting under the decree. The evidence is conflicting and may be said to be fairly well balanced. The trial court, in the exercise of its equitable powers, being authorized to' direct a new sale if the one made was for a manifestly inadequate price, notwithstanding the property sold for more than two-thirds of the appraised value, and not having done so, we can not say there was an abuse of discretion, or that the appraisement is presumptively fraudulent. The most that can be said is that the appraisers were mistaken, only, in their valuation, and this alone is insufficient to warrant the reversal of the order of confirmation. *Williams v. Taylor,*68 Nebr., 717; *Cole v. Willard,*62 Nebr., 839, and authorities there cited.

The order of confirmation ought to be affirmed, which is accordingly done.

Affirmed.
* All SkyView UAS operators must perform this pre-flight checklist prior to every respective flight. 

PRE-FLIGHT CHECKLIST*

HULL AND PROPELLORS 

All hull screws are securely fastened to the body of the UAS.

All propellers are securely fastened to the motors.

Transmitters and accompanying wires are securely fastened to the hull.

Camera(s), gimbal(s), and accompanying wires are securely fastened to the hull.

There are no loose parts, wires, screws, or extremities that can fall from the UAS.

Operators Notes: 

SAFETY CHECK 

The operator performed a visual review of the area of operation.

The operator is aware of aerial obstructions (i.e., poles, structures, utility wires, trees).

The operator is not within 3-miles of an airport.

The operator clearly marked a take-off/landing zone with 4 orange caution cones.

The operator has clearly announced that a UAS is preparing for flight.

The operator has ensured no persons or animals are near the caution zone.

Weather permits the safe operation of the UAS (i.e., little to no wind, no precipitation, 

If working in pairs, the second operator has a pair of binoculars to maintain line of sight 

Operators Notes: 

POWER TO SYSTEM

The battery being placed into the UAS has a full capacity charge.

The batteries inside the RC controller have a sufficient charge.

There is a spare UAS battery with a full charge.

There are spare batteries for the RC controller with a full charge.

The UAS battery is securely fastened within the UAS hull

The UAS powers up completely indicating a normal audible chime of operability.

All lights on the UAS are operating normally.

Operators Notes: 

RC/WIFI/FPV CONNECTIVITY 

There is a steady connection between the RC controller and the UAS.

There is a steady connection between the video transmitter and the FPV receiver.

The UAS is responding accurately and efficiently to RC commands.

Video equipment is responding accurately and efficiently to FPV commands.

FPV OSD is operational. 

RC Controller is set to GPS and HL and CL modes are both turned off. 

Operators Notes:

SATELLITE CONNECTIVITY 

UAS is indicating full satellite/GPS connectivity.

UAS has set the “home” location. 

Following take-off, UAS successfully completes a 10-second unassisted hover. 

Operators Notes:

UAS Operator’s Signature: ___________________________ Date: ____________________
#### David F. Price, Respondent, v. Peerless Casualty Company, Appellant, and Murray M. Cowen, Defendant-Respondent.

Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Cars-well, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
§ 39.11 Reliability reports. ( a ) The Electric Reliability Organization shall conduct assessments as determined by the Commission of the reliability of the Bulk-Power System in North America and provide a report to the Commission and provide subsequent reports of the same to the Commission.
( b ) The Electric Reliability Organization shall conduct assessments of the adequacy of the Bulk-Power System in North America and report its findings to the Commission, the Secretary of Energy, each Regional Entity, and each Regional Advisory Body annually or more frequently if so ordered by the Commission.
( c ) The Electric Reliability Organization shall make available to the Commission, on a non-public and ongoing basis, access to the Transmission Availability Data System, Generator Availability Data System, and protection system misoperations databases, or any successor databases thereto. Such access will be limited to: ( 1 ) Data regarding U.S. facilities; and
( 2 ) Data that is required to be provided to the ERO.
[Order 672, 71 FR 8736, Feb. 17, 2006, as amended by Order 824, 81 FR 45008, July 12, 2016]
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION**     Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the UnitedStates Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), J. William Freytag, the Chief Executive Officer of Myogen, Inc.(the “Company”), and Joseph L. Turner, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each herebycertifies that, to the best of his knowledge:     **1. **The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, to whichthis Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and     **2. **The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the PeriodicReport and results of operations of the Company for the periods covered by the Periodic Report.Dated: August 7, 2006   /s/ J. William Freytag /s/ Joseph L. Turner   J. William Freytag Joseph L. Turner*Chief Executive Officer* *Chief Financial Officer**(Principal Executive Officer)* *(Principal Financial Officer)*     This certification “accompanies” the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed withthe SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whethermade before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation languagecontained in such filing.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Stonewall  Financial,  Ltd.,
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2001 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"),  the undersigned,  B.
Stephen Bailey,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge  and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7191

DAVID WALLACE JONES,

 Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of 

Corrections,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michel F. Urbanski, District 

Judge. (7:13-cv-00561-MFU-RSB)

Submitted: January 15, 2015 Decided: January 20, 2015

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Aaron Jennings Campbell, OFFICE 

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

David Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A)

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Jones has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 1311.11 What are TVA's obligations in interstate situations? ( a ) TVA is responsible for: ( 1 ) Identifying proposed Federal financial assistance and direct Federal development that potentially impact on interstate areas;
( 2 ) Notifying appropriate officials and entities in states which have adopted a process and which select TVA's program or activity;
( 3 ) In accordance with § 1311.7(b), making efforts to identify and notify the affected state, areawide, regional and local officials and entities in those states that have not adopted a process under the Order or do not select TVA's program or activity;
( 4 ) Responding pursuant to § 1311.10 of this part if TVA receives a recommendation from a designated areawide agency transmitted by a single point of contact, in cases in which the review, coordination, and communication with TVA have been delegated.
( b ) TVA uses the procedures in § 1311.10 if a state process provides a state process recommendation to TVA through a single point of contact.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 54 (Monday, March 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 15290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6503]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Sanders County Resource Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of Sanders County Resource Advisory Committee Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community 
Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393) the Lolo and Kootenai 
National Forests' Sanders County Resource Advisory Committee will meet 
on April 21, 2011 at 7 p.m. in Thompson Falls, Montana for a business 
meeting. The meeting is open to the public.

DATES: April 21, 2011.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Thompson Falls Courthouse, 
1111 Main Street, Thompson Falls, MT 59873.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randy Hojem, Designated Federal 
Official (DFO), District Ranger, Plains Ranger District, Lolo National 
Forest at (406) 826-3821.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda topics include solicitation for new 
RAC project proposals, reviewing progress on current projects, and 
receiving public comment. If the meeting location is changed, notice 
will be posted in the local newspapers, including the Clark Fork Valley 
Press, and Sanders County Ledger.

    Dated: March 14, 2011.
Randy R. Hojem,
District Ranger.
[FR Doc. 2011-6503 Filed 3-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
#### Max Bronsnick, Respondent, v. Williamsburg Realty Corporation, Appellant.

No opinion. Carswell, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Document Search 
-  SBA Plan For Use of Covered Funds 

# SBA Plan for Use of Covered Funds

## About this document and download

SBA’s plan for use of funds provided through public laws: Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act), the Paycheck Protection Program and Health Care Enhancement Act, and Coronavirus Preparedness and Response Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2020.

  Download  .pdf

**Related Programs**    Related programs:
ACCEPTED

12-15-00198-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

8/20/2015 3:49:04 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 8/20/2015 3:49:04 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BRYANT JOHNSON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 256 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18th day of November, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Deciding when or even if to become a

parent is one of the most important choices you

will make — for you, for your partner, and for your

future. Maybe you are having sex and don’t want

to have a baby right away. Maybe you want to

learn about how to space your children in the

future. Maybe you’re just curious about contraception. The point is, contraceptive methods help

you plan when you will become a parent. This

brochure tells you about one of the methods, so

you can choose the one — or two — that seem

right for you.

These choices matter to both men and

women. Although most contraceptive methods

are used by women, men are just as involved.

Contraception seems to work best when a man

and woman choose a method together and use it

together!

For additional copies, please contact:

Office of Population Affairs Clearinghouse

P.O. Box 30686, Bethesda, MD 20824 or

Phone: (301) 654-6190 Fax: (301) 215-7731

What you should know about:

 DEPO-PROVERA

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Office of Public Health and Science

Office of Population Affairs
What is it? Depo-Provera is a long-acting form of the hormone depomedroxyprogesterone acetate (progestin).

How does it work? Depo-Provera works in several ways. It thickens

cervical mucus, which blocks sperm; it prevents ovulation; and it prevents implantation.

How is it used? Depo-Provera is injected into a woman’s upper arm or

buttock once every 12 weeks.

How well does it work? Depo-Provera is almost 100% effective

for 12 weeks. Failure rates increase when the shot is not given on time.

Does it reduce the risk for HIV/AIDS and STDs?

No. A male latex condom should be used with Depo-Provera to reduce the risk of HIV/AIDS

and STDs.

What are its main advantages? Depo-Provera lasts for 12

weeks. It does not interfere with sex. And it can be used by women who have a

history of seizures (reduces seizures) and sickle-cell anemia. It also can be used

while breastfeeding.

What are some possible problems? The Depo-Provera

shot must be administered every 12 weeks. It can cause menstrual changes, including

irregular bleeding, spotting, missed periods, or no periods. It can cause weight gain, depression, breast tenderness, headaches, and allergic reaction. These side effects can last up

to 6 months after the last injection. Depo-Provera also may delay a woman’s ability to

become pregnant after it is discontinued. And it may cause bone density changes or bone

loss and adverse effects on lipid levels in the blood.
#### Dana A. Friend et al., Appellants, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Brooklyn Trust Company, Respondent.

Present — Carswell, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
§ 154.311 Updating of statements. ( a ) Certain statements and schedules in § 154.312, that include test period data, must be updated with actual data by month and must be resubmitted in the same format and with consecutive monthly totals for each month of the adjustment period with a single set of updates encompassing a 12-month period. The updated statements or schedules must be filed 45 days after the end of the test period. The updated filing must be provided to parties specifically requesting them. The updated filing must reference the associated docket number and must be filed in the same format, form, and number as the original filing.
( b ) The statements and schedules in § 154.312 to be updated are: Statements C, D and H-4; Schedules B-1, B-2, C-3, D-2, E-2, E-4, G-1, G-4, G-5, G-6, H-1 (1)(a), H-1 (1)(b), H-1 (1)(c), H-1 (2)(a) through H-1 (2)(k), H-2 (1), H-3 (3), I-4, and I-6.
( c ) This requirement to file updates may be extended by the Secretary pursuant to § 375.302 of this chapter.
[Order 582-A, 61 FR 9629, Mar. 11, 1996]
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 15

- 00350

- CV

Jack RETTIG

, Appellant

v.

Ronald E. BRUNO , Christopher Garcia, Sergio Lopez, Patrick G. Mendoza, and Troy J.

Williams,

Appellees

From the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CVQ000699 D2

Honorable Monica Z. Notzon, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, appellant’s motion to reinstate and

dismiss th is appeal is GRANTED in part, and this appeal is DISMISSED AS MOOT . Costs of

appeal are taxed against the party incurring same.

SIGNED January 11, 2017.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice
### subpart b—conservation reserve

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Subchapter B of chapter 1 of subtitle D of title XII of the Food Security Act of 1985, comprising this subpart, was originally designated in Pub. L. 99–198, title XII, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1509, by Pub. L. 101–624, title XIV, §§1431(1), 1432(1), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3576, 3577, and amended by Pub. L. 99–500, Oct. 18, 1986, 100 Stat. 1783, and Pub. L. 99–591, Oct. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 3341; Pub. L. 99–641, Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3556; Pub. L. 100–233, Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1568; Pub. L. 100–387, Aug. 11, 1988, 102 Stat. 924; Pub. L. 101–512, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1915; Pub. L. 101–624, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3359; Pub. L. 102–237, Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1818; Pub. L. 102–324, July 22, 1992, 106 Stat. 447; Pub. L. 102–552, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4102; Pub. L. 103–66, Aug. 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 312; Pub. L. 104–127, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 888; Pub. L. 106–78, Oct. 22, 1999, 113 Stat. 1135; Pub. L. 106–387, Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1549; Pub. L. 107–76, Nov. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 704. Subchapter B is shown herein, however, as having been added by Pub. L. 107–171, title II, §2101(a), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 238, without reference to the intervening amendments because of the extensive revision of the subchapter's provisions by Pub. L. 107–171.
در صورت داشتن شرایط اضطراری با ۹۱۱ تماس بگیرید. به آنها عالیم خود را بگویید و اینکه سفر بین‌المللی داشته‌اید یا سفر دریایی داشته‌اید.

N316091-CS

PM 4 2020 27, Mar

روش استفاده از گزارش ۱۴ روزه

دو نوبت در روز )صبح و شب(، دمای بدن و نشانههای احتمالی -19COVID را ثبت کنید: تب، سرفه یا مشکالت تنفسی.

این کار را هر روز به مدت 14 روز انجام دهید.

	. تاریخها را از روز 0 تا روز 14 در گزارش ثبت کنید. روز 0 همان روزی است که کشور بینالمللی را ترک 

کردهاید یا از سفر دریایی بازگشتهاید.

	. ثبت دمای بدن و نشانهها را با شروع از تاریخ امروز ثبت کنید.

بازگشتهاید، پایان مییابد. 	. روند نظارت بر سالمتی شما 14 روز پس از روز کشور بینالمللی را ترک کردهاید یا از سفر دریایی 

1 آوریل 2020

2 آوریل 2020

3 آوریل 2020

4 آوریل 2020

5 آوریل 2020

6 آوریل 2020

روز تاریخ نشانھ ھای بیماری دمای بدن

روز 

0

روز 

1

روز 

2

روز 

3

روز

4

روز

5

بدون نشانھ 97.4 فارنھایت

بدون نشانھ 98.6 فارنھایت

بدون نشانھ 96.9 فارنھایت

بدون نشانھ 98.6 فارنھایت

بدون نشانھ 98.0 فارنھایت

بدون نشانھ 98.6 فارنھایت

بدون نشانھ 97.3 فارنھایت

بدون نشانھ 98.6 فارنھایت

بدون نشانھ 96.5 فارنھایت

بدون نشانھ 98.6 فارنھایت

نمونھ روز 0 روزیاستکھ کشور بین المللی را ترک کرده اید یا از سفر دریایی بازگشتھ اید.
N316091-CS

PM 4 2020 27, Mar

روز تاریخ نشانھ ھا دما

روز 0

روز 1

روز 2

روز 3

روز 4

روز 5

روز 6

روز 7

روز 8

روز 9

روز 10

روز 11

روز 12

روز 13

روز 14

روز0ھمانروزیاستکھ کشور بین المللی را ترک کرده اید یا از سفر دریایی بازگشتھ اید.

نشانههای بیماری و دمای بدن خود را هر روز و به مدت 14 روز در قسمت زیر بنویسید.

اگر بیمار شدید: • در خانه بمانید. • از تماس با دیگران دوری کنید. • ممکن است -19COVID داشته باشید، بیشتر مردم توانایی بهبود در خانه 

بدون مراقبتهای پزشکی را دارند. • اگر مشکل تنفسی دارید یا نگران عالیم خود هستید با ارایه دهندگان مراقبتهای بهداشتی تماس بگیرید یا پیام 

بدهید. به آنها در مورد سفر اخیر خود و عالیمتان اطالع بدهید. • قبل از مراجعه به مطب پزشک یا اورژانس، اطالع قبلی بدهید.

گزارش ۱۴ روزه نشانه‌های بیماری و دمای بدن

coronavirus/gov.cdc.www
### Faulk. Scott (OST)

From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Cc: -

~~; i ~\: - ; 

## t 

## r-~i L,: l~-



## .·--'
-:'- 1 ~-.T/-;p· ;~~.:~

~ mark miller <mamksal@live.com> ;-' ::-' - :;. ~' . : Wednesday, April 

### 09, 2014 1 : 21 PM

Faulk, Scott (OST)

. ': - ' Tgxanne . onuma@mokulelehawaiLcom; Richard Shuman ; Michael Maruyama ; Bev Chang ; Marsha Drapes; louise . linker@yahoo.com Kalaupapa 

### EAS Meeting 

### Subject: Scott Just wanted you to know that I held my monthly meeting for the Kalaupapa Settlement today, April 

## s", and invited Mokelele and Makani Kai Airlines to do a presentation. Afterwards, to get a feel if our previous letters of support for Makani Kai continue to be relevant I asked for a show of hands. Of the 

### 78 people present, all but one voted their continual support for Makani Kai Airlines as the EAS provider for Kalaupapa Settlement. If I can provide any other information, please let me know . Mark Miller Administrator Kalaupapa Settlement 

### 808-567-6924

1
#### § 24.309 Payment of award.

An applicant seeking payment of an award shall submit a copy of the final decision granting the award to the Department's Accounting Office for processing. A statement that review of the underlying decision is not being sought in the United States courts, or that the process for seeking review of the award has been completed, must also be included.