alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fosetyl‐al Meeting Summary 10‐30‐14

On October 29th, 2014, the EPA Registration Review team met with representatives from Bayer Cropscience, the fosetyl‐

al technical registrant, to discuss risk management following the publication of the preliminary risk assessments in June

2014. Prior to the meeting Bayer provided information on use and usage of fosetyl‐al. The OPP team requested

clarification on some uses, requested some additional information, and discussed proposed clarification/mitigations for

registration review.    

Topics Discussed:

o Registration review timeline

o Proposed clarifications and use pattern modifications for registration review

 All Uses

 Pineapple

 Turf

 Ornamental

 Conifer

o Master Use Template

o Implementation

o Additional Items for follow up

List of Attendees

Name Organization Email

Ricardo Jones EPA/PRD Jones.ricardo@epa.gov

Jessica Fernandez Bayer Cropscience Jesica.fernandez@bayer.com  

Sean McGee Bayer Cropscience Sean.mcgee@bayer.com  

Terrie Moore Bayer Cropscience Terrie.moore@bayer.com

Charlotte Hanson Bayer Cropscience <phone>

George Munson Bayer Cropscience <phone>

Mike Swartz Bayer Cropscience <phone>

Aswathy Balan EPA/RD Aswathy.balan@epa.gov

Tara Chandgoyal EPA/BEAD Chandgoyal.tara@epa.gov

Jonathan Becker EPA/BEAD Becker.jonathan@epa.gov

Monisha Kaul EPA/BEAD Kaul.monisha@epa.gov

Michelle Ranville EPA/BEAD Ranville.michelle@epa.gov  

Jean Holmes EPA/EFED Holmes.jean@epa.gov

Brian Anderson EPA/EFED Anderson.brian@epa.gov

Kris Garber EPA/EFED Garber.kristina@epa.gov

Mat Lloyd EPA/HED Lloyd.mat@epa.gov  

Neil Anderson EPA/PRD Anderson.neil@epa.gov

Tom Moriarty EPA/PRD Moriarty.thomas@epa.gov  

Arnet Jones EPA/BEAD Jones.arnet@epa.gov
EXHIBIT 99.3

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of ITS Networks Inc.
(the  Company)  for  the  quarter  ended  March  31,  2004, as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the  Report), the
undersigned  Chief  Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
each  hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     1.  The  Report  fully  complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  May  20,  2004


     -----------------------------            -------------------------------
     Gustavo Gomez, Director,                 Herman  de  Haas,
     Chief Executive Officer,                 Director, Executive Vice
     President, Chief Financial               President and Chief Operating
     Officer and Treasurer                    Officer
#### § 345.59 Inmate performance pay.

Inmate workers for FPI may also receive Inmate Performance Pay for participation in programs where this award is made. However, inmate workers may not receive both Industries Pay and Performance Pay for the same program activity. For example, an inmate assigned to a pre-industrial class may not receive FPI pay as well as inmate performance pay for participation in the class.
================================================================================

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report of Amexdrug Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jack Amin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Jack Amin
-------------
Jack Amin
Chief Executive Officer
March 31, 2011


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
### §409f. Jurisdiction of New Jersey in civil, criminal and legislative matters retained; citizenship unaffected

Nothing in this subchapter shall be held to deprive the State of New Jersey, or any political subdivision thereof, of its civil and criminal jurisdiction in and over the areas included in said national historical park, nor shall this subchapter in any way impair or affect the rights of citizenship of any resident therein; and save and except as the consent of the State of New Jersey may be hereafter given, the legislative authority of said State in and over all areas included within such national historical park shall not be diminished or affected by the creation of said park, nor by any terms and provisions of this subchapter.

(Mar. 2, 1933, ch. 182, §7, 47 Stat. 1422.)
§ 401.92 Notice to possible violators. Upon direction of the Commission the Executive Director shall, and in all other instances, the Executive Director may require a possible violator to show cause before the Commission why a penalty should not be assessed in accordance with the provisions of these rules and section 14.17 of the Compact. The notice to the possible violator shall: ( a ) Set forth the date on which the possible violator shall respond; and
( b ) Set forth any information to be submitted or produced by the possible violator.
§ 25.3 System information. ( a ) There is established at the FBI a National Instant Criminal Background Check System.
( b ) The system will be based at the Federal Bureau of Investigation, 1000 Custer Hollow Road, Clarksburg, West Virginia 26306-0147.
( c ) The system manager and address are: Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, J. Edgar Hoover F.B.I. Building, 935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20535.
§ 42.408 Complaint procedures. ( a ) Federal agencies shall establish and publish in their guidelines procedures for the prompt processing and disposition of complaints. The complaint procedures shall provide for notification in writing to the complainant and the applicant or recipient as to the disposition of the complaint. Federal agencies should investigate complaints having apparent merit. Where such complaints are not investigated, good cause must exist and must be stated in the notification of disposition. In such cases, the agency shall ascertain the feasibility of referring the complaint to the primary recipient, such as a State agency, for investigation.
( b ) Where a federal agency lacks jurisdiction over a complaint, the agency shall, wherever possible, refer the complaint to another federal agency or advise the complainant.
( c ) Where a federal agency requires or permits recipient to process title VI complaints, the agency shall ascertain whether the recipients' procedures for processing complaints are adequate. The federal agency shall obtain a written report of each such complaint and investigation and shall retain a review responsibility over the investigation and disposition of each complaint.
( d ) Each federal agency shall maintain a log of title VI complaints filed with it, and with its recipients, identifying each complainant by race, color, or national origin; the recipient; the nature of the complaint; the dates the complaint was filed and the investigation completed; the disposition; the date of disposition; and other pertinent information. Each recipient processing title VI complaints shall be required to maintain a similar log. Federal agencies shall report to the Assistant Attorney General on January 1, 1977, and each six months thereafter, the receipt, nature and disposition of all such title VI complaints.
### §§10, 10a. Repealed. Pub. L. 91–383, §10(a)(2), (3), as added Pub. L. 94–458, §2, Oct. 7, 1976, 90 Stat. 1941

Section 10, act Mar. 3, 1905, ch. 1405, 33 Stat. 873, authorized National Park Service employees to arrest and prosecute persons violating the laws and regulations relating to the national forests and national parks. Act Mar. 3, 1905, insofar as it relates to the Forest Service, is classified to section 559 of this title. Pub. L. 91–383, §10(a), as amended, amended act Mar. 3, 1905, to delete references to the National Park Service and the national parks.

Section 10a, act Mar. 2, 1933, ch. 180, §2, 47 Stat. 1420, related to the authorization of commissioners, superintendents, caretakers, officers, or guards of national military parks, national parks, battlefield sites, national monuments, and miscellaneous memorials, to arrest and prosecute persons for violations of any of the regulations prescribed pursuant to former section 9a of this title.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1672 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### DocumenLNumber: Docket Number: 

# A-98-1 3

Printed 9/30/2008 11:01:00 AM Sheet 46 of 132P. 2 

### A 9 8 1 3 II-M 7 From : To : Subject : Copie s to : Dat e sent : Bil l Allmon d NAC D Sel f<PES 1 RTP/GLAFLAM >

BILLNAC D <BILLNACD@aol.com > Phon e Cal l o n 3/1 6 STEV E SHED D <SHEDD.STEVE@epamail.epa.gov> Fri , 1 3 Ma r 1998 14:38:2 3 -0500 (EST )

Bill : Stev e Shed d sai d tha t Mondayat 9:0 0 woul d b e a goo d tim e t o make th e phon e cal l abou t th e liquid s distributio n rule . W e wil l cal l yo u at tha t time . T o answe ryou rquestio n abou t preparin g fo rth e call , w e generall yar e investigatin g th e rol e o fblendin g an d packagin g operation s (e.g. , NAC D members ) i n th e greate rliquid s distributio n industry . Fo r example , d o suc h operation s exis t separatel yo rare the ycollocate d wit h terminal s o rproductio n facilitie s (o ral l ofth e above?) ? Ar e the ymajo rsource s o fHA P emissions ? Ho wd o the yoperate , an d wha t ar e thei remissio n characteristics ? Th e lis t o f question s I sen t yo u i s quit e general , bu t thos e ar e som e o fth e detail s tha t w e nee d t o fin d ou t about . O f course , w e are stil l als o intereste d i n expandin g ou rmailin g lis t fo rth e survey , an d i n locatin g on e o rmore facilitie s t o visi t i n orde rt o collect additiona l information . I hop e thi s help s yo u i n understandin g ou rfocu s i n thi s specialty are a o f mixing/packaging . We'l l tal k t o yo u Monda

yat 9:00 . Regards , Gre g LaFla m PES , Inc .

Gre g LaFla m „ 1 „ Mon , 1 3 Ap r199 8 14:51:2 6
§ 115.77 Corrective action for contractors and volunteers. ( a ) Any contractor or volunteer who engages in sexual abuse shall be prohibited from contact with inmates and shall be reported to law enforcement agencies, unless the activity was clearly not criminal, and to relevant licensing bodies.
( b ) The facility shall take appropriate remedial measures, and shall consider whether to prohibit further contact with inmates, in the case of any other violation of agency sexual abuse or sexual harassment policies by a contractor or volunteer.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk September 24, 2012

t0917 

# Order

September 24, 2012

145162 & (10)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145162

COA: 308894

Calhoun CC: 2010

- 003261

- FC

RUSSELL WARD McCARN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 4, 2012 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for remand is

DENIED.
### SUBCHAPTER LIX–T—MARSH-BILLINGS-ROCKEFELLER NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 90881 / January 8, 2021

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-17874

IN THE MATTER OF

TALMAN HARRIS

NOTICE THAT INITIAL DECISION HAS BECOME FINAL

The time for filing a petition for review of the initial decision in this proceeding has 

expired. No such petition has been filed by Talman Harris or the Division of Enforcement, and 

the Commission has not chosen to review the decision on its own initiative.

Accordingly, notice is hereby given, pursuant to Rule 360(d) of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice,1that the initial decision of the administrative law judge has become the final 

decision of the Commission with respect to Talman Harris.

2 The orders contained in that 

decision are hereby declared effective. The initial decision ordered that, pursuant to Section

15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Talman Harris is barred from associating with any 

broker, dealer, investment adviser, municipal securities dealer, municipal advisor, transfer agent, 

or nationally recognized statistical rating organization, and from participating in an offering of 

penny stock, including acting as a promoter, finder, consultant, agent, or other person who 

engages in activities with a broker, dealer, or issuer for purposes of the issuance or trading in any 

penny stock, or inducing or attempting to induce the purchase or sale of any penny stock. 

For the Commission, by the Office of the General Counsel, pursuant to delegated 

authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

 Secretary

 

1

 17 C.F.R. § 201.360(d).

2

 Talman Harris and Victor Alfaya, Initial Decision Release No. 1402, 2020 WL 5407727 

(Sept. 2, 2020).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5

<MULTIPLIER>                                                                 1

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                            6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                  MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                                       SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                                     $54
<SECURITIES>                                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                                0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                            54
<PP&E>                                                                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                              54
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                    4,080
<BONDS>                                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                                 1,359
<OTHER-SE>                                                              (5,385)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                                 0
<SALES>                                                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                             0
<CGS>                                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                              0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                          0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                                                 0
<EPS-BASIC>                                                              .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                              .00



</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman,
Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahr a Bridget M. McCormac k
David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstei n Kurtis T. Wilde r Elizabeth T. Clement,
J ustices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at t he direction of the Court.

May 1, 2018

s0423 

# Order

Clerk 

### May 1, 2018

156053(83)(84)(85)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 15 6053 COA: 331190 Oakland CC: 2014-252692-FH DAVID KENT CHAPLIN, Defendant-Appellant.

___________________ __________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration i s GRANTED. The motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 5, 2018 or der is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entere d erroneously. The
motion for miscellaneous relief is DENIED.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 85786 / May 6, 2019

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-18047

In the Matter of 

IBEX ADVANCED MORTGAGE 

 TECHNOLOGY, INC.

NOTICE THAT INITIAL DECISION HAS BECOME FINAL

The time for filing a petition for review of the initial decision in this proceeding has 

expired. No such petition has been filed by Ibex Advanced Mortgage Technology, Inc., and the 

Commission has not chosen to review the decision on its own initiative.

Accordingly, notice is hereby given, pursuant to Rule 360(d) of the Commission's Rules 

of Practice,1that the initial decision of the administrative law judge has become the final 

decision of the Commission with respect to Ibex Advanced Mortgage Technology, Inc.2The 

order contained in that decision is hereby declared final. The initial decision ordered that, 

pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registration of each class of 

registered securities of Ibex Advanced Mortgage Technology, Inc., is revoked. The revocation is 

effective as of May 7, 2019.

For the Commission, by the Office of the General Counsel, pursuant to delegated 

authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

 Acting Secretary

 

1

 17 C.F.R. § 201.360(d).

2

 Ibex Advanced Mortg. Tech., Inc., Initial Decision Release No. 1343 (Dec. 21, 2018), 2018 

WL 6722780. The Central Index Key number for Ibex Advanced Mortgage Technology, Inc., is: 

1561504.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2017

t 1120 s 

# Order

Clerk November 29, 2017

154592

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 154592

COA: 327375

Bay CC: 13

- 010011

- FH

JOEL IRWING WILSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 23, 2016

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE that part of the judgment of the Court of

Appeal s remanding this case to the trial court for a hearing pursuant to People v

Lockridge , 498 Mich 358 (2015), and we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for

plenary review of the defendant’s claim that his sentence was disproportionate under the

standar d set forth in People v Milbourn , 435 Mich 630, 636 (1990). See People v

Steanhouse , 500 Mich 453, 460

- 461 (2017). In all other respects, leave to appeal is

DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be

reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

C LEMENT

, J., did not participate.
Pictured is a Latina princess washing her hands with the text “Everyone loves to have clean 

hands!”
§ 46.123 Early termination of research support: Evaluation of applications and proposals. ( a ) The department or agency head may require that department or agency support for any project be terminated or suspended in the manner prescribed in applicable program requirements, when the department or agency head finds an institution has materially failed to comply with the terms of this policy.
( b ) In making decisions about supporting or approving applications or proposals covered by this policy the department or agency head may take into account, in addition to all other eligibility requirements and program criteria, factors such as whether the applicant has been subject to a termination or suspension under paragraph (a) of this section and whether the applicant or the person or persons who would direct or has have directed the scientific and technical aspects of an activity has have, in the judgment of the department or agency head, materially failed to discharge responsibility for the protection of the rights and welfare of human subjects (whether or not the research was subject to federal regulation).
### §192b–3. Acquisition of lands

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to acquire lands and interests in lands by donation or with donated funds, by purchase with Federal funds, or otherwise, in his discretion, for development of an appropriate eastern approach to the park, described as follows:

### sixth principal meridian

Township 5 north, range 73 west; those parts of the following subdivisions lying south of the south boundary of the present Highdrive Road right-of-way: Section 27, east half southwest quarter, and south half southeast quarter; section 34, northeast quarter northeast quarter; section 35, west half northwest quarter northwest quarter; those parts of the following subdivisions lying north and west of the left bank of the Big Thompson River: Section 34, north half southeast quarter northeast quarter; section 35, southwest quarter northwest quarter comprising approximately one hundred and forty-five acres; and a strip of land, not to exceed an average of five hundred feet in width, generally paralleling the Thompson River for approximately one and six-tenths miles from near the center of section 25, township 5 north, range 73 west, to the one hundred and forty-five-acre tract described elsewhere in this section.

(Aug. 24, 1949, ch. 501, §2, 63 Stat. 626.)