alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 35 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 35

    Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign 
 military sale to the United Arab Emirates of certain defense articles 
                             and services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2019

Mr. Menendez (for himself, Mr. Graham, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Paul, Mr. Leahy, 
  Mr. Young, and Mr. Reed) introduced the following joint resolution; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign 
 military sale to the United Arab Emirates of certain defense articles 
                             and services.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the following proposed 
foreign military sale to the United Arab Emirates is prohibited:
            (1) The sale of the following defense articles, including 
        defense services and technical data, described in Transmittal 
        No. 17-0B, submitted to Congress pursuant to section 36(b) of 
        the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(b)) and published 
        in the Congressional Record on June 4, 2019: The proposed sale 
        of 28 AH-64E Remanufactured Apache Attack Helicopters; 10 new 
        AH-64E Apache Attack Helicopters; 76 T700-GE-701D Engines (56 
        remanufactured, 18 new, 6 spares, 2 installed); 40 AN/ASQ-170 
        Modernized Target Acquisition and Designation Sight/AN/AAR-11 
        Modernized Pilot Night Vision Sensors (28 remanufactured, 10 
        new, 2 spares); 32 remanufactured AN/APR-48B Modernized Radar 
        Frequency Interferometers; 47 AAR-57 Common Missile Warning 
        Systems (31 remanufactured, 10 new, 6 spares); 150 Embedded 
        Global Positioning Systems with Inertial Navigation (60 
        remanufactured, 74 new, 16 spares); 45 Manned-Unmanned Teaming-
        International (MUMTi) systems (28 remanufactured, 10 new, 7 
        spares); and 15 new MUMTi System Upper Receivers, training 
        devices, helmets, simulators, generators, transportation, 
        wheeled vehicles and organization equipment, spare and repair 
        parts, support equipment, tools and test equipment, technical 
        data and publications, personnel training and training 
        equipment, United States Government and contractor engineering, 
        technical, and logistics support services, and other related 
        elements of logistics support.
                                 <all>
```
SECIIRITIES& MCHANGE COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING MAILED FOR SERVICE FILE NO. 3-10635 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Before the 

'TFD. NO. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE CONIMISSION 

November 27, 2001 

In the Matter of 


REPORT FOLLOWING 


TOKS INC. PREHEAIUNG CONFERENCE 


On November 13, 2001, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission"), 

acting pursuant to Section 8(d) of the Securities Act of 1933, ordered a public hearing beginning 

November 29, 2001, at 10:OO a.m., at the Commission's offices at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., 

Washington, DC 20549 to consider allegations by the Division of Enforcement ("Division") that 

the registration statement filed by Toks Inc. ("Toks") on August 31, 2001, and amended on 

September 7, 2001, contains untrue statements of material fact and omits material facts required 

to be stated so as to make the statements presented not misleading ("OIP"). 

I scheduled a prehearing conference for November 26, 2001, after Ade Ogunjobi, 

founder of Toks, informed me by a facsimile that a hearing on November 29, 2001, was 

impossible because he had received an incomplete copy of the OIP. In response, the Division 

submitted copies of certificates of service attesting to personal service of complete copies of 

the OIP on both Toks and Mr. Ogunjobi, Also on November 20, 2001, the Division sent 

Toks and Mr. Ogunjobi additional copies of the OIP. 

Toks did not appear at the telephonic conference on November 26, 2001. Counsel for 

the Division reported that Mr. Ogunjobi had left him a voice message on November 23, 2001, 

saying that he would not participate in the prehearing conference. The Division requested that 

the hearing proceed on November 29, 2001, as scheduled so that it could submit evidence. 

including a transcription of the voice mail it received on November 23, 2001. I granted the 

Division's request. Mr. Ogunjobi should be aware that failure by Toks to appear at the 

hearing will almost certainly result in a ruling that is adverse to Toks. 

1 

,* , / "%% 

Brenda P. Pdurray / i * \ 

Chief Administrative Law Judge ,,