alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 53 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 53

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental 
    Protection Agency relating to ``Repeal of the Clean Power Plan; 
Emission Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Existing Electric 
Utility Generating Units; Revisions to Emission Guidelines Implementing 
                             Regulations''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 9, 2019

 Mr. Cardin introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
  twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental 
    Protection Agency relating to ``Repeal of the Clean Power Plan; 
Emission Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Existing Electric 
Utility Generating Units; Revisions to Emission Guidelines Implementing 
                             Regulations''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to 
``Repeal of the Clean Power Plan; Emission Guidelines for Greenhouse 
Gas Emissions From Existing Electric Utility Generating Units; 
Revisions to Emission Guidelines Implementing Regulations'' (84 Fed. 
Reg. 32520 (July 8, 2019)), and such rule shall have no force or 
effect.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

     Each person whose signature appears below authorizes Alan G. McNally,
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, or Edward W. Lyman, Vice
Chair of the Board, to execute in the name of each such person who is then an
officer or director of the registrant, and to file, the 2000 Harris Bankcorp,
Inc. Annual Report to the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-K
pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

<TABLE>
<S>                                              <C>

/s/                                              /s/
-------------------------------------            -------------------------------------
Pastora San Juan Cafferty                        Leo M. Henikoff
Director                                         Director

/s/                                              /s/
-------------------------------------            -------------------------------------
Martin R. Castro                                 Richard M. Jaffee
Director                                         Director

/s/                                              /s/
-------------------------------------            -------------------------------------
Haven E. Cockerham                               Edward W. Lyman, Jr.
Director                                         Vice Chair and Director

/s/                                              /s/
-------------------------------------            -------------------------------------
F. Anthony Comper                                Alan G. McNally
Director                                         Chairman of the Board,
                                                 Chief Executive Officer, and Director

/s/                                              /s/
-------------------------------------            -------------------------------------
Susan T. Congalton                               Charles H. Shaw
Director                                         Director

/s/                                              /s/
-------------------------------------            -------------------------------------
Wilbur H. Gantz                                  Richard E. Terry
Director                                         Director

/s/                                              /s/
-------------------------------------            -------------------------------------
James J. Glasser                                 James O. Webb
Director                                         Director
</TABLE>
### §648b. Grants for SBDCs

#### (a) In general

The Administrator may make grants to small business development centers under section 648 of this title to provide targeted technical assistance to small business concerns seeking access to capital or credit, Federal procurement opportunities, energy efficiency audits to reduce energy bills, opportunities to export products or provide services to foreign customers, adopting, making innovations in, and using broadband technologies, or other assistance.

#### (b) Allocation

#### (1) In general

Subject to paragraph (2), and notwithstanding the requirements of section 648(a)(4)(C)(iii) of this title, the amount appropriated to carry out this section shall be allocated under the formula under section 648(a)(4)(C)(i) of this title.

#### (2) Minimum funding

The amount made available under this section to each State shall be not less than $325,000.

#### (3) Types of uses

Of the total amount of the grants awarded by the Administrator under this section—

(A) not less than 80 percent shall be used for counseling of small business concerns; and

(B) not more than 20 percent may be used for classes or seminars.

#### (c) No non-Federal share required

Notwithstanding section 648(a)(4)(A) of this title, the recipient of a grant made under this section shall not be required to provide non-Federal matching funds.

#### (d) Distribution

Not later than 30 days after the date on which amounts are appropriated to carry out this section, the Administrator shall disburse the total amount appropriated.

#### (e) Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated to the Administrator $50,000,000 to carry out this section.

(Pub. L. 111–240, title I, §1402, Sept. 27, 2010, 124 Stat. 2550.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010, and not as part of the Small Business Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

For definition of "Administrator" and "small business concern" as used in this section, see section 1001 of Pub. L. 111–240, set out as a note under section 632 of this title.
## Regional Haze - BA**RT Eligiblity & Source Inventory** 

**- VI WA PA** 

**- 3 Islands Virgin Islands Water and Pow** **er A uthority**  **(VI WA PA** 

**)**

**Location Unit No.** **Source Type Capacity** **Heat Input Fuel**  **Date Potential To Emit (PTE), tons per year**  **BART Eligible? MW** **mmBTU/hr Type** **Constructed SO2**  **NOx PM10/PM**  **(Note 15)**

St Thomas 11 Note 1, 9, 11, 12 18 268 No 6 Oil 1968 646 371 60/??? Yes St Thomas 13 Note 1, 9, 10, 11, 12 35 485 No 6 Oil 1970 1116 670 28/??? Yes St Thomas 12 Note 2, 11, 12, 14 16 290 No.2 Oil 1970 381 1288 15/??? Yes St Thomas 14 Note 2, 11, 12, 13, 1416 298 No.2 Oil 1972 392 1326 16/??? Yes St Thomas 15 Note 2, 11, 12 23 310 No.2 Oil 1981 292 504 5/5 No St Thomas 18 Note 2, 12 23 323 No.2 Oil 1992 301 451 5/5 No St Thomas 22 Note 3, 12 24 247 No.2 Oil 2002 228 337 9/22.6 No St Thomas 23 Note 3, 12 39 484 No.2 Oil 2004 313 592 30/30 No St ThomasHRSG (designed for units 12, 14, 15 and 18) - but duct burner no longer in service

St Croix 10 Note 1, 6, 7 7.5 260 No 6 Oil 1967 396 359 45/??? Yes St Croix 11 Note 1, 6, 7 18 468 No 6 Oil 1970 712 646 81/??? Yes St Croix 16 Note 2 23 339 No 2 Oil 1981 297 554 53/??? No St Croix 17 Note 2 20 336 No 2 Oil 1988 294 457 53/??? No St Croix 19 Note 3 24.5 318 No 2 Oil 1993 278 451 79/??? No St Croix 20 Note 3 24.5 318 No 2 Oil 1994 281 451 79/??? No St CroixHRSG (designed for units 16 and 17) - but duct burner no longer in service St CroixDiesel engine Note 8 650 kW 6.24 No. 2 Oil 1994 3 53 1/??? No

St JohnSTJ-188-92 Note 5 2.5 25 diesel 1974 12.5 165 ???/33 No

Notes (1) Fossil Fuel (Oil) fired steam electric boiler (2) Combustion Turbines (cogeneration units) firing No 2 Oil - generating electricity; Units 12 and 14 on St Thomas have GE Turbine Model PG 5211 (3) Combustion Turbines (simple cycle units) firing No. 2 Oil - generating electricity (4) The applicable BART-eligible source category name is: Fossil Fuel-fired Steam Electric Plants (250 MM BTU heat input per hour) (5) The 2.5 MW diesel engine-generator on St John is used for emergency power with annual permit restrictions of 703,620 gallons No 2 (diesel) oil
EX-10.38



 Exhibit 10.38 

UNIVAR USA INC. SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN 

(As Amended and Restated Effective July 1, 2004) 

Ninth Amendment 
 WHEREAS,
Univar USA Inc. (the “Company”) sponsors and maintains the Univar USA Inc. Supplemental Retirement Plan, as amended and restated effective July 1, 2004 and as thereafter amended (the “Plan”); and 

WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to reflect the freeze of accrued benefits and cessation of benefit accruals on
December 31, 2009 for all active participants under the Univar USA Inc. Retirement Plan; and 
 NOW, THEREFORE, effective
December 31, 2009, Section 3 of the Plan, Participation, is hereby amended by adding the following new paragraph to the end thereof: 

“Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, effective December 31, 2009, accrued benefits under
this Plan are frozen for those Participants whose benefits under the Retirement Plan are frozen as of December 31, 2009 pursuant to the terms of the Retirement Plan (including, without limitation, the terms of Appendix T of the Retirement
Plan), and no additional benefits shall accrue for such Participants under this Plan after December 31, 2009.” 
 This Ninth
Amendment is executed this 21st day of December, 2009. 
  

			
	UNIVAR USA INC.
		
	By	 	 /s/ Dave Strizzi

	
	Its President
S. J. Res. 67 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty 

Joint Resolution 

Providing for the reappointment of Risa Lavizzo-Mourey as a citizen regent of 

the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Statutes (20 U.S.C. 43), 

the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, 

in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by reason 

of the expiration of the term of Risa Lavizzo-Mourey of Pennsylvania 

on February 21, 2020, is filled by the reappointment of the incumbent. The reappointment is for a term of six years, beginning 

on the later of February 21, 2020, or the date of enactment of 

this joint resolution. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30970 Summary Calendar

LLOYD P. LARRIEU, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

NEW ORLEANS AVIATION BOARD, Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Louisiana

(95-CV-2270)
February 13, 1997
Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, DAVIS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Lloyd Patrick Larrieu appeals an adverse summary judgment in his action

claiming ownership of approximately 1492 acres of land within the perimeters of

the New Orleans International Airport. Our review of the record and briefs2

discloses no error in the trial court’s disposition. On the basis of the undisputed

facts found, authorities cited, and reasoning of the trial judge in his comprehensive

Orders and Reasons entered herein on August 13, 1996, we AFFIRM.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 30 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 30

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign 
 military sale to the United Arab Emirates of certain defense articles 
                             and services.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the following proposed 
foreign military sale to the United Arab Emirates is prohibited:
            (1) The sale of the following defense articles, including 
        defense services and technical data, described in Transmittal 
        No. 19-18, submitted to Congress pursuant to section 36(b) of 
        the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(b)) and published 
        in the Congressional Record on June 4, 2019: The proposed sale 
        of a blanket-order United States Marine Corps training, 
        training support, and other training related services in 
        support of the United Arab Emirates Presidential Guard Command.

            Passed the Senate June 20, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. J. RES. 30

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

    Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign 
 military sale to the United Arab Emirates of certain defense articles 
                             and services.
```
**EXHIBIT
31.2**
 I, Francis
Mailhot , certify
that:
 1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of OSK CAPITAL II
CORP.;
 
 2. Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 (a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c) Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
  5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditor and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a) All
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 
 (b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 Dated:
May 6, 2005
 
 
 /s/
Francis Mailhot

Francis
Mailhot,
Chief
Accounting Officer
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law

of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation

of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the

terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 3/25/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

STANLEY CHARLES TOPPING, 

Plaintiff - Appellant, No. 95-1359

v. (D.C. No. 95-S-597)

DON LAWSON and NORA KURTZ,

Security Sgt., 

(D. Colo.)

Defendants - Appellees.

 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before PORFILIO, McKAY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

After examining Appellant’s brief and the appellate record, this panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination

of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore

ordered submitted without oral argument.

This is a pro se appeal from a § 1915(d) dismissal of a § 1983 action claiming

cruel and unusual punishment. From the Plaintiff’s own pleadings it is clear that this case
2

falls comfortably in that class of disputes over the course of medical treatment and does

not remotely allege facts supporting a cruel and unusual punishment claim. Olson v.

Stotts, 9 F.3d 1475, 1477 (10th Cir. 1993).

The motions for leave to appeal informa pauperis and the production of records are

denied. The appeal is dismissed as legally frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d).

DISMISSED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Monroe G. McKay

Circuit Judge
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration Between City Service Cleaning Contractors, Inc., Appellant, and Frank Vanzo, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.
### §3204. Allowed uses

#### (a) Establishment and use of new facilities

On all public lands where the taking of fish and wildlife is permitted in accordance with the provisions of this Act or other applicable State and Federal law the Secretary shall permit, subject to reasonable regulation to insure compatibility, the continuance of existing uses, and the future establishment, and use, of temporary campsites, tent platforms, shelters, and other temporary facilities and equipment directly and necessarily related to such activities. Such facilities and equipment shall be constructed, used, and maintained in a manner consistent with the protection of the area in which they are located. All new facilities shall be constructed of materials which blend with, and are compatible with, the immediately surrounding landscape. Upon termination of such activities and uses (but not upon regular or seasonal cessation), such structures or facilities shall, upon written request, be removed from the area by the permittee.

#### (b) Denial of proposed use or establishment

Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, the Secretary may determine, after adequate notice, that the establishment and use of such new facilities or equipment would constitute a significant expansion of existing facilities or uses which would be detrimental to the purposes for which the affected conservation system unit was established, including the wilderness character of any wilderness area within such unit, and may thereupon deny such proposed use or establishment.

(Pub. L. 96–487, title XIII, §1316, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2485.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 96–487, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2371, known as the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3101 of this title and Tables.
§ 301.310 Witnesses. ( a ) If a claimant wishes to present witnesses at the hearing, the claimant must provide the Committee, no less than 10 days before the scheduled hearing date, the name and address of each proposed witness, along with an outline of each witness' testimony. The Committee may limit the number of witnesses who may appear at a hearing, however, the Committee has no authority to compel the attendance of any witness.
( b ) Any person confined in a Federal, State, or local penal or correctional institution at the time of the hearing may not appear as a witness, but that person's testimony may be submitted in the form of a written statement.
### **CHAPTER 10A—SOCKEYE OR PINK SALMON FISHING**
Order entered December 31, 2019

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 01268

- CR

JENNIFER FOLEY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 26th Dis trict Court

Williamson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 14

- 0094

- K26



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellant’s December 23, 2019 motion for extension of time to file

her brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief received along with the motion filed a s

of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
# IA_SEC_-_FIRM_ROSTER_FOIA_DOWNL
HomeLatest FilingsPrevious Page

    - SEC Home  »
    - Search the Next-Generation EDGAR System  »
    - Company Search  »
    - Current Page

35 MILLER AVENUE #145MILL VALLEY CA 94941         

35 MILLER AVENUE #145MILL VALLEY CA 94941         (800) 896-5089

BondBloxx ETF Trust CIK#: 0001879238 (see all company filings)
State location: CA | State of Inc.: **DE**File Number: **812-15526**(List all Funds and Classes/Contracts for BondBloxx ETF Trust)

||
||
### §§198e to 198j. Repealed. June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §39, 62 Stat. 992, eff. Sept. 1, 1948

Section 198e, acts Mar. 2, 1929, ch. 583, §6, 45 Stat. 1538; June 28, 1938, ch. 778, §1, 52 Stat. 1213, related to appointment and jurisdiction of commissioner. See provisions covering United States magistrate judges in section 631 et seq. of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedures.

Section 198f, act Mar. 2, 1929, ch. 583, §7, 45 Stat. 1538, related to issuance of process and arrest. See sections 3041 and 3141 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and rules 4, 5(c), and 9 of Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Title 18, Appendix.

Section 198g, act Mar. 2, 1929, ch. 583, §8, 45 Stat. 1538, related to whom process is directed and arrest without process. See section 3053 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, rule 4 of Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Title 18, Appendix, and rule 4 of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Title 28, Appendix, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

Section 198h, acts Mar. 2, 1929, ch. 583, §9, 45 Stat. 1539; June 28, 1938, ch. 778, §1, 52 Stat. 1213, related to salary.

Section 198i, act Mar. 2, 1929, ch. 583, §10, 45 Stat. 1539, related to fees, costs, and expenses.

Section 198j, act Mar. 2, 1929, ch. 583, §11, 45 Stat. 1539, related to disposition of fines and costs.