alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GABRIEL FERNANDO

- PULIDO, AKA Luis Gerardo Diaz Ortiz,

Petitioner,

v.
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 17

- 70259

Agency No. A096

- 549

- 910

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 11, 2020 * * Pasadena, California

Before: BERZON, R. NELSON, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Gabriel Fernando

- Pulido petitions for review of the Board of Immigration
Appeals’ decision to affirm the denial o f asylum, withholding of removal, and

relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT)

. We review such denials for

substantial evidence and w ill only reverse if the evidence “ compels ” a contrary

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 13 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2

result. Silva

- Pereira v. Lynch , 827 F.3d 1176, 1184 (9th Cir. 2016); Parussimova
v. Mukasey , 555 F.3d 734, 738

– 39 (9th Cir. 2009). W e deny the petition.

1. Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s dete rmination that there was

no nexus between Fernando

- Pulido’s feared harm and his kinship ties , which is

required for asylum and withholding of removal claims. See Guo v. Sessions , 897
F.3d 1208, 1213 (9th Cir. 2018). While Fernando

- Pulido ’s family members ha ve
apparently suffered a series of tragic events, they do not appear to be related to

each other . Nor do they suggest that Fernando

- Puli d o himself may face

persecution based on these kinship ties

.
Fernando

- Pulido alleg es that his grandmother was murdered, but he admit s

that he does not know why she was killed

. Fernando

- Pulido also states that his

aunt was kidnapped
, but his testimony conf l icts with his aunt’s testimony about

who carried out the kidnapping. Finally, Fe rnando

- Pulido himself admitted to the

BIA that there was no indication that the man who threatened his brother had any

connection with the other men who allegedly harmed his family.

2. Substantial evidence also supports the denial of CAT relief. To
qualify for CAT relief, an alien must establish a likelihood of torture if removed to

the proposed country of removal. Cole v. Holder , 659 F.3d 762, 770 (9th Cir.

2011). Torture requires th e harm to be “inflicted by or at the instigation of or with

the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official3

capacity.” 8 C.F.R. § 1208.18(a)(1). There is little evidence in the record that the

men who murdered Pulid o’s grand mother were related to the government. Indeed,

Fernando

- Pulido himself admits that he does not have any proof of that beyond his

testimony , which is based on secondhand information from his mother and aunt

.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 85926/ May 23, 2019

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-18229

In the Matter of

DEMITRIOS HALLAS

NOTICE THAT INITIAL DECISION HAS BECOME FINAL

The time for filing a petition for review of the initial decision in this proceeding has 

expired. No such petition has been filed by Demitrios Hallas and the Commission has not 

chosen to review the decision on its own initiative.

Accordingly, notice is hereby given, pursuant to Rule 360(d) of the Commission's Rules 

of Practice,1that the initial decision of the administrative law judge has become the final 

decision of the Commission with respect to Demitrios Hallas.

2

The order contained in that 

decision is hereby declared effective. The initial decision ordered that, under Section 15(b) of 

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Demitrios Hallas is barred from associating with a broker, 

dealer, investment adviser, municipal securities dealer, municipal advisor, transfer agent, or 

nationally recognized statistical rating organization, and from participating in an offering of 

penny stock.

For the Commission, by the Office of the General Counsel, pursuant to delegated 

authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Acting Secretary

 

1

 17 C.F.R. § 201.360(d).

2

 Demitrios Hallas, Initial Decision Release No. 1358 (Feb. 22, 2019), 2019 WL 857547.
§ 32.46 Director appeal. ( a ) In order to exhaust his administrative remedies, a claimant seeking relief from the denial of his claim shall appeal to the Director under subpart F of this part.
( b ) Consistent with § 32.8, any claim denial that is not appealed to the Director under paragraph (a) of this section shall constitute the final agency determination, unless the denial is reviewed otherwise under subpart F of this part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF JULY 2, 2000, AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JULY 2, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-02-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                           5,086
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,839
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,199
<INVENTORY>                                    248,317
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               350,397
<PP&E>                                         374,356
<DEPRECIATION>                                 227,059
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 922,184
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          133,534
<BONDS>                                        694,051
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     94,882
<COMMON>                                           669
<OTHER-SE>                                    (54,882)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   922,184
<SALES>                                        352,732
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               353,732
<CGS>                                          240,280
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  240,280
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               126,602
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,169
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (50,319)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (6,049)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (44,379)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (44,379)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.76)


</TABLE>
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 22

- 00268

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 393rd District Court

Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15

- 047 11

- 393

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Birdwell, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### I N THE 

### I NTEREST OF 

### X.G., M.G., J.G., AND 

### M.G., C HILDREN2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered A ppellant ’ s unopposed “ Motion to Withdraw Appeal

, ”

w hich we construe as a motion to dismiss the appeal

. We grant the m otion and

dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Appellant s must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43. 4.

Per Curiam

Delivered : October 27, 2022
§ 367.2260 Account 226, Unamortized discount on long-term debt—Debit. ( a ) This account must include the excess of the face value of long-term debt securities over the related cash value of consideration received, related to the issue or assumption of all types and classes of debt.
( b ) Amounts recorded in this account must be amortized over the life of the respective issues under a plan that will distribute the amount equitably over the life of the securities. The amortization must be on a monthly basis, with the related amounts charged to account 428, Amortization of debt discount and expense (§ 367.4280). (*see* General Instructions in § 367.16.)
### MANDATE


## Court of Appeals
**First District of Texas**

NO. 01

- 13

- 01091

- CV

JUDITH KING, INDIVID UALLY AND AS INDEPEN DENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF KENNETH KI NG , Appellants

V.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATION AL TRUST COMPANY, AS INDENTURE TRUSTEE,

ON BEHALF OF THE OWNERS OF ACCREDITED MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2004

- 4 ASSET BACKED NOTES , BY ITS ATTORNEY

- IN

- FACT AND SERVICER

IN

- FACT, SELECT PORTFOL IO SERVICING, INC. , Appellee

Appeal from the 281st District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2012

- 36457).

TO THE 281ST DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 18th day of August 2015, the case upon appeal to revise
or to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:
This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on October 3, 2013. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court lacked subject

- matter jurisdiction over the case. Accordingly, the Court vacates the trial court’s judgment and dismisses the

case.The Court orders that the appellee, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Indenture Trustee, on behalf of the Owners of Accredited Mortgage Loan Trust 2004

- 4 Asset Backed Notes, by its Attorney

- in

- Fact and Servicer

- in

- Fact, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., pay all appellate costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered August 18, 2015.

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higl ey, and Huddle. Opinion delivered by Justice Huddle.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court
in this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

October 30 , 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE CLERK OF THE COURT
EXHIBIT 32.1




Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002






In connection with the Annual Report of Teliphone Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10–Q/A for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George Metrakos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:




1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ George MetrakosGeorge Metrakos

Chief Executive Officer






Dated: April 2, 2010
#### § 345.82 Apprenticeship training.

FPI provides inmate workers with an opportunity to participate in apprenticeship training programs to the extent practicable. Such programs help prepare workers for post-release employment in a variety of trades. Apprentices are given related trades classroom instruction in addition to the skill training during work hours, where necessary.
FROM: THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, COUNTY OF CASCADE.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. RICHARD PAUL HALL, Defendant.

NO. CDC-87-026a

On November 24,1987, the Defendant was sentenced to Count I, 7forty (40 years for Robbery, ten (10 years for Persistent felony offender and ten (10 years for the use ofa dangerous weapon. All sentences are to run consecutively If paroled, the defendantistopayrestitutioniniheamountof$22,733;daogerousoffenderdesignatian.

QnNovember 16,1989the Defendants applicationfor review ofthat sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court

After careful consideration, it was the unanimous decision ofthe Sentence Review Division thatthe sentence shall be remanded back to Judge Thomas McKittrick ofthe DistrictCourtin Cascade County pursuant to the State v. Camitsch case to make findings withrespecttohis reasons for designatmgthe defendant as adangerous offender.

January 30, 1990, Judge McKittrick filed findings as to his reasons for designatmgthe defendant a dangerous offender.

Upon review of the January 30, 1990 decision by Judge McKittrick, the Sentence Review Board finds that restitution was ordered without any time suspended.

*19DATED this 23rd day of April, 1990.

Therefore, the case is remanded back to Judge McKittrick for reconsideration. According to Section 46-18-201, MCA, part of the sentence must be suspended or the restitution must be omitted.
§ 542.10 Purpose and scope. ( a ) *Purpose.* The purpose of the Administrative Remedy Program is to allow an inmate to seek formal review of an issue relating to any aspect of his/her own confinement. An inmate may not submit a Request or Appeal on behalf of another inmate.
( b ) *Scope.* This Program applies to all inmates in institutions operated by the Bureau of Prisons, to inmates designated to contract Community Corrections Centers (CCCs) under Bureau of Prisons responsibility, and to former inmates for issues that arose during their confinement. This Program does not apply to inmates confined in other non-federal facilities.
( c ) *Statutorily-mandated procedures.* There are statutorily-mandated procedures in place for tort claims (28 CFR part 543, subpart C), Inmate Accident Compensation claims (28 CFR part 301), and Freedom of Information Act or Privacy Act requests (28 CFR part 513, subpart D). If an inmate raises an issue in a request or appeal that cannot be resolved through the Administrative Remedy Program, the Bureau will refer the inmate to the appropriate statutorily-mandated procedures.
[67 FR 50805, Aug. 6, 2002]
§ 30.6 What procedures apply to the selection of programs and activities under these regulations? ( a ) A state may select any program or activity published in the Federal Register in accordance with § 30.3 of this part for intergovernmental review under these regulations. Each state, before selecting programs and activities, shall consult with local elected officials.
( b ) Each state that adopts a process shall notify the Attorney General of the Department's programs and activities selected for that process.
( c ) A state may notify the Attorney General of changes in its selections at any time. For each change, the state shall submit to the Attorney General an assurance that the state has consulted with local elected officials regarding the change. The Department may establish deadlines by which states are required to inform the Attorney General of changes in their program selections.
( d ) The Attorney General uses a State's process as soon as feasible, depending on individual programs and activities, after the Attorney General is notified of its selections.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 36 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 36

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed transfer to the 
   Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and 
  Northern Ireland, the Kingdom of Spain, and the Italian Republic of 
                 certain defense articles and services.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the issuance of a 
manufacturing license, technical assistance license, or export license 
with respect to any of the following proposed agreements or transfers 
to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and 
Northern Ireland, the Kingdom of Spain, and the Italian Republic is 
prohibited:
            (1) The transfer of the following defense articles, 
        including defense services and technical data, described in 
        Executive Communication 1427 (EC-1427) submitted to Congress 
        pursuant to subsections (c) and (d) of section 36 of the Arms 
        Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776) and published in the 
        Congressional Record on June 3, 2019:
                    (A) Coproduction and manufacture in Saudi Arabia of 
                Paveway Pre-Amp Circuit Card Assemblies (CCA), Guidance 
                Electronics Assembly (GEA) CCAs, and Control Actuator 
                System (CAS) CCAs for all Paveway variants.
                    (B) Coproduction and manufacture in Saudi Arabia of 
                Paveway II Guidance Electronics Detector Assemblies 
                (GEDA) and Computer Control Groups (CCG).
                    (C) The transfer of up to 64,603 additional kits, 
                partial kits, and full-up-rounds.

            Passed the Senate June 20, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. J. RES. 36

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed transfer to the 
   Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and 
  Northern Ireland, the Kingdom of Spain, and the Italian Republic of 
                 certain defense articles and services.
```
#### § 33.50 General financial requirements.

Grants funded under the criminal justice block grant program are governed by the provisions of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circulars applicable to financial assistance. These Circulars along with additional information and guidance are contained in “Financial and Administrative Guide for Grants,” Guideline Manual 7100.1, available from the Office of Justice Programs. This Guideline Manual provides information on cost allowability, methods of payment, audit, accounting systems and financial records.
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certifications





The undersigned officer certifies that this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vantone International Group, Inc.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Vantone International Group, Inc. and will be retained by Vantone International Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





August 16, 2010
/s/ Honggang YuHonggang Yu, Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer
§ 5.202 Short form registration statement. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section, each partner, officer, director, associate, employee, and agent of a registrant is required to file a registration statement under the Act. Unless the Assistant Attorney General specifically directs otherwise, this obligation may be satisfied by the filing of a short form registration statement.
( b ) A partner, officer, director, associate, employee, or agent of a registrant who does not engage directly in registrable activity in furtherance of the interests of the foreign principal is not required to file a short form registration statement.
( c ) An employee or agent of a registrant whose services in furtherance of the interests of the foreign principal are rendered in a clerical, secretarial, or in a related or similar capacity, is not required to file a short form registration statement.
( d ) Whenever the agent of a registrant is a partnership, association, corporation, or other combination of individuals, and such agent is not within the exemption of paragraph (b) of this section, only those partners, officers, directors, associates, and employees who engage directly in activity in furtherance of the interests of the registrant's foreign principal are required to file a short form registration statement.
( e ) The short form registration statement shall be filed on Form OBD-66. Any change affecting the information furnished with respect to the nature of the services rendered by the person filing the statement, or the compensation he receives, shall require the filing of a new short form registration statement within 10 days after the occurrence of such change. There is no requirement to file exhibits or supplemental statements to a short form registration statement.
(28 U.S.C. 509 and 510; 5 U.S.C. 301)
[Order No. 376-67, 32 FR 6362, Apr. 22, 1967, as amended by Order No. 960-81, 46 FR 52355, Oct. 27, 1981; Order No. 2674-2003, 68 FR 33630, June 5, 2003]
#### THE PEOPLE OF THE TERRITORY OF GUAM v. VINCENT VILORIA, Defendant

Criminal No. 97F-76

Superior Court of Guam

October 28, 1976

ABBATE, *Judge*

DECISION

In denying Defendant’s 5 October, 1976, Motion to Dismiss for prosecution’s non-compliance with a discovery order, this Court cites the Decision in the companion case *People of the Territory of Guam v. Michael Imamura,*104F-76.

Submit order.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of John H. Harland Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Charles B. Carden, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
             15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.



/s/ Charles B. Carden                             3/10/2005
------------------------------                    ---------------------
Charles B. Carden                                   Date
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer