alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of TELECONNECT INC. (the
"Company") for the quarter ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company each hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: February 13, 2007


By: /s/ Gustavo Gomez                   By: /s/ Alfonso de Borbon
    ---------------------------------       ------------------------------------
    Gustavo Gomez, Director,                Alfonso de Borbon,
    Chief Executive Officer,                Director, Chief Accounting
    President, and Treasurer                and Financial Officer,
                                            Executive Vice President and
                                            Chief Operating Officer
# C_2012138EN.01003907.xml

| 12.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/39

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 10 February 2012 — Bömcke v EIB

(Case F-95/10) (1)

(2012/C 138/97)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 328, 4.12.2010, p. 62.

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

November 13, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00402

- CV

IN THE ESTATE OF MARIA L. RAYNES, DECEASED,

From the Probate Court No 2, Bexar County, T exas Trial Court No. 2013PC0369 The Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant/cross

- appellee’s brief was originally due on September 12, 2018. On September 11, 2018, appellant/cross

- appellee filed a motion for extension of time, which was granted, and appellant/cross

- appellee’s brief became due October 12, 2018. On October 5, appellant/cross

- appellee filed a second motion for extension of time, which was also granted. We extended appellant/cross

- a ppellee’s briefing deadline to November 1 2 , 2018. Appellant/cross

- appellee has now filed a third motion for extension of time, requesting an additional thirty days in which to file her appellant’s brief. We GRANT appellant/cross

appellee’s motion for ext ension of time. Appellant/cross

- appellee’s brief is due on or before December 12, 2018. Further extensions of time in which to file appellant/cross

- appellee’s brief are disallowed absent extenuating circumstances.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WI TNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 13th day of November, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE
, Clerk of C ourt
#### Cushman & Wakefield, Inc., Respondent, v. General Motors Corporation, Appellant.

No opinion. The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of Sanders County Resource Advisory Committee Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393) the Lolo and Kootenai National Forests' Sanders County Resource Advisory Committee will meet on April 21, 2011 at 7 p.m. in Thompson Falls, Montana for a business meeting. The meeting is open to the public.

# DATES:

April 21, 2011.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Thompson Falls Courthouse, 1111 Main Street, Thompson Falls, MT 59873.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Randy Hojem, Designated Federal Official (DFO), District Ranger, Plains Ranger District, Lolo National Forest at (406) 826-3821.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda topics include solicitation for new RAC project proposals, reviewing progress on current projects, and receiving public comment. If the meeting location is changed, notice will be posted in the local newspapers, including the Clark Fork Valley Press, and Sanders County Ledger.

Dated: March 14, 2011.

Randy R. Hojem,

District Ranger.

[FR Doc. 2011-6503 Filed 3-18-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
#### § 2.54 Reviews pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4215(c).

The Attorney General, within thirty days after entry of a Regional Commissioner's decision, may request in writing that the National Appeals Board review such decision. Within sixty days of the receipt of the request the National Appeals Board shall, upon the concurrence of two members, affirm, modify, or reverse the decision, or order a rehearing at the institutional or regional level. The Attorney General and the prisoner affected shall be informed in writing of the decision, and the reasons therefor.

[42 FR 39821, Aug. 5, 1977, as amended at 43 FR 17470, Apr. 25, 1978; 44 FR 3408, Jan. 16, 1979]
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  SBA Leadership 
-  Terry Sutherland 

#   Terry Sutherland

Deputy Associate Administrator

Office of Communications and Public Liaison

            Download high-resolution image          

Terry Sutherland supports the Associate Administrator for the Office of Communications and Public Liaison (OCPL). As the Deputy Associate Administrator he is responsible for providing senior executive leadership and management oversight for the Press Office, Marketing, Strategic Alliances, Digital Media and budget.

He has served at SBA since 2013 with duties in the Office of  Entrepreneurship Education (OEE), the Office of Veterans Business Development (OVBD) and several previous positions within OCPL.  Prior to SBA he served as the senior spokesman and Director, Corporate Communications, for the Pentagon Force Protection Agency (PFPA) and prior to that he was the senior spokesman and Chief, External Communications at the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). Before embarking on his civilian federal career Mr. Sutherland served 20 years in the United States Navy, first as a Surface Warfare Officer and then as a career-designated Public Affairs Officer. He retired as a Commander in 2007. He is a Desert Storm veteran.

In addition to his experience, Mr. Sutherland was awarded a master’s degree in Public Relations and Corporate Communications from Georgetown University and a master’s degree in Human Relations from the University of Oklahoma. He is a graduate of the Harvard Kennedy School of Government, Senior Executive Fellows program. He holds a bachelor’s degree in Economics from Virginia Military Institute where he also received his naval officer commission. He graduated from the CFP® Board Registered education program at Georgetown University and in years past was a registered stockbroker and financial advisor with NASD/FINRA Series 7 and 66 licenses.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  For Partners 
-  Counselors 
-  Instructional Materials For Trainers 
-  Money Smart For Small Business 

## Section navigation

-  Lenders 
-  Counselors    -  Small Business Development Centers 
  -  Veterans Business Outreach Centers 
  -  Women's Business Centers 
  -  Community Navigator Pilot Program 
  -  Instructional materials for trainers      -  SBA Spanish glossary 
    -  Money Smart for Small Business 
    -  Business Smart Toolkit 
  -  Nexus 
-  SBICs 
-  Surety bond partners and agents 
-  Contracting officials 

# Money Smart for Small Business

Thinking of starting or already managing a business? 

The Financial Literacy and Education Commission was established under Title V of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions (FACT) Act of 2003 to improve the financial literacy and education of persons in the United States. The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) wishes to bring financial literacy not only to America as a whole, but specifically to small businesses and future entrepreneurs. The commission was asked to develop a national financial education website (MyMoney.gov), along with a hotline, 1-800-FED-INFO, and a national strategy on financial education. It is chaired by the Secretary of the Treasury and comprises the heads of 22 federal entities, including SBA.

**Money Smart for Small Business**

Money Smart for Small Business provides a practical introduction to topics related to starting and managing a business. Developed jointly by SBA and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), this instructor-led curriculum consists of 13 modules. SBA and FDIC invite eligible organizations** **to begin teaching this free curriculum right away!

Money Smart modules cover a wide range of interests and knowledge level of the targeted audience. Each module is available in English and Spanish and has three components including a text-accessible instructor guide, participant guide, and PowerPoint slides. The materials are designed to teach each module in approximately 60-90 minutes. Modules can be taught in any order or independently.
1 

Suppliers of Blind Quality Control (QC) Urine Samples

Date: March 2017

A list of blind sample suppliers has been compiled by the Division of Workplace Programs, for information 

purposes only, to facilitate compliance with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Mandatory 

Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs. It does not constitute an endorsement for any or all of 

the suppliers. It reflects solely the information supplied to this office by those suppliers who requested inclusion on 

the list. Purchasers should obtain information from the supplier to verify compliance with Mandatory Guidelines 

requirements for blind samples prior to use in federal workplace drug testing programs. 

Any supplier interested in having its name added to the list below should contact Giselle Hersh at 240-276-2600 

(phone) or by email: Giselle.hersh@samhsa.hhs.gov. 

Abuse Control Associates

c/o KKL Enterprises, Inc.

7 Robinson Spur

Huntsville, TX 77320

Contact: Charles Rushing

Phone: 936-436-9026

Fax: 936-435-0578

Email: kklinc@wt.net

Duo Research, Inc.

503 Goldflower Drive

Durham, NC 27713-9269

Contact: Dr. Robert Willette

Phone: 303-596-0995

Email: robertwillette@duoresearch.com

Dyna-Tek, Inc.

8369 Nieman Road

Lenexa, KS 66214

Contact: Kevin J. Dyches

Phone: 913-438-6363

Fax: 913-438-6111

Email: ksdyches@aol.com

Website: http://www.dtitesting.com

ElSohly Laboratories, Inc.

5 Industrial Park Drive

Oxford, MS 38655

Contact: Dr. Mahmoud ElSohly

Phone: 662-236-2609

Fax: 662-234-0253

Email: elsohly@elsohly.com

Website: http://www.elsohly.com

National Toxicology Specialists

1425 Elm Hill Pike

Nashville, TN 37210

Contact: Dr. Howard Taylor

Phone: 615-353-1888

Fax: 615-356-1890

Email: htaylor@drugtestinfo.com

Website: www.drugtestinfo.com
2 

Professional Toxicology Services

(formerly A. T. Laboratories)

7917 Bond Street

Lenexa, KS 66214

Contact: Dr. Stan Kammerer

Phone: 913-599-3535

Fax: 913-599-0660

Email: atlaboratories@sbcglobal.net

Website: http://www.protoxservices.com

RTI International

Center for Forensic Sciences

3040 Cornwallis Road, Bldg. 7 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

Contact: Dr. Francis M. Esposito

Phone: 919-316-3837 / 1-800-334-8571 x 23837

Fax: 919-541-7042

Email: esposito@rti.org

Website: http://www.rti.org

Quality Assurance Co.

310 Commerce Dr.

Martinez, GA 30907

Contact: Dr. Roy Altman, Tom Lavin

Phone: 706-863-6536

Fax: 706-863-3313

Email: qas@toxicologycontrols.com

Website: www.toxicologycontrols.com

Sure-Tech Diagnostic Associates

11040 Lin Valle Drive, Suite D

St. Louis, MO 63123

Contact: Dr. Quincy Crider

Phone: 800-678-8933 / 314-894-8933

Fax: 314-894-5223

Email: INFO@SURE-TECH.NET

Website: http://www.sure-tech.net
#### The STATE OF FLORIDA, Plaintiff, v. Rogers MERRITT, Defendant.

No. 64-702-Civ-CF.

United States District Court S. D. Florida.

Sept. 22, 1966.

*224Rogers Merritt, in pro. per.

Herbert P. Benn, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Fla., for the State of Florida.

ORDER

FULTON, Chief Judge.

This cause came on before the Court upon Motion for Rehearing on the denial of the petition for writ of habeas corpus. Said petition, as amended, urged the following grounds to support the claim that petitioner’s detention at the Glades Detentional Institute is unlawful:

1. Deprivation of a preliminary examination under § 901.23, Florida Statutes, F.S.A.

2. Illegal search and seizure.

3. Illegal arrest without a warrant.

On February 4, 1965, this Court denied the amended petition on the ground that deprivation of a preliminary hearing was not a prerequisite to the finding of an indictment or the filing of an information.

Pursuant to mandate, that Order was vacated and petitioner’s claim of illegal search and seizure was considered. On June 29, 1966, this Court denied the amended petition based upon the fact that the subject matter of the alleged search and seizure was not introduced as evidence against petitioner at his trial, without ruling on whether there was in fact an illegal search and seizure.

The third ground for the petition, illegal arrest without a warrant, remains to be considered.

A naked allegation of illegal arrest is not grounds for the discharge of a state prisoner under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 unless petitioner further claims that such arrest in some way deprived him of a fair trial. Fernandez v. Klinger, 346 F.2d 210 (C.A. 9, 1965); Green v. Yeager, 223 F.Supp. 544 (D.C.N.J., 1963); aff’d, 332 F.2d 794 (C.A. 3, 1964); Madison v. Tahash, 249 F.Supp. 600 (D.C.Minn., 1966); Nelson v. Hancock, 210 F.Supp. 60 (D.C.N.H., 1962).

The petition, as amended, and the motion for rehearing disclose only the allegation that an illegal search and seizure followed' the arrest without a warrant. Since the subject matter of the claimed illegal search and seizure was not used as evidence against petitioner at his trial, the arrest did not deprive him of a fair trial. Thereupon, it is,

Ordered and adjudged that the Motion for Rehearing on the denial of the petition for writ of habeas corpus be and the same is hereby denied.
FROM: THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, COUNTY OF LAKE.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. ROGER LEE GARDIPEE, Defendant.

NO. DC-88-66 DECISION

DATED this 3rd day of August, 1990.

On January 31,1990, the Defendant was sentenced to five (5) years for the revocation of Criminal Possession of Dangerous Drugs; he was given 35 days credit for time served and was designated as a Dangerous Offender.

On August 3, 1990, the Defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The Defendant was present and was represented by Cath Steger, of the Montana Defender Project. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the Defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it if such is possible. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

After careful consideration, there was a split decision by the members of the Sentence Review Board. The five (5) years for the revocation of Criminal Possession of Dangerous Drugs shall remain the same as imposed, however, the Dangerous Designation shall be changed to Non- Dangerous. The defendant shall be given 35 days credit for time served.

The reason for the decision is based upon *State v. Nelson,*246 Montana Reports, (Sentence Review Division), 1990. The change in designation from non-dangerous to dangerous after the date of the offense amounted to an ex post facto application of the law to the detriment of the defendant.

Acting Chairman, Hon. Bart Erickson,

DISSENT:

The Honorable Ed McLean

dissents. He would have left the sentence as originally imposed by Judge McNeil, based upon the presumption of the validity of the District Court Judgment.
§ 37.5 Obligations of Transmission Providers and Responsible Parties. ( a ) Each Transmission Provider is required to provide for the operation of an OASIS, either individually or jointly with other Transmission Providers, in accordance with the requirements of this Part. The Transmission Provider may delegate this responsibility to a Responsible Party such as another Transmission Provider, an Independent System Operator, a Regional Transmission Group, or a Regional Reliability Council.
( b ) A Responsible Party must provide access to an OASIS providing standardized information relevant to the availability of transmission capacity, prices, and other information (as described in this part) pertaining to the transmission system for which it is responsible.
( c ) A Responsible Party may not deny or restrict access to an OASIS user merely because that user makes automated computer-to-computer file transfers or queries, or extensive requests for data.
( d ) In the event that an OASIS user's grossly inefficient method of accessing an OASIS node or obtaining information from the node seriously degrades the performance of the node, a Responsible Party may limit a user's access to the OASIS node without prior Commission approval. The Responsible Party must immediately contact the OASIS user to resolve the problem. Notification of the restriction must be made to the Commission within two business days of the incident and include a description of the problem. A closure report describing how the problem was resolved must be filed with the Commission within one week of the incident.
( e ) In the event that an OASIS user makes an error in a query, the Responsible Party can block the affected query and notify the user of the nature of the error. The OASIS user must correct the error before making any additional queries. If there is a dispute over whether an error has occurred, the procedures in paragraph (d) of this section apply.
( f ) Transmission Providers must provide “read only” access to the OASIS to Commission staff and the staffs of State regulatory authorities, at no cost, after such staff members have complied with the requisite registration procedures.
[Order 889, 61 FR 21764, May 10, 1996, as amended by Order 605, 64 FR 34124, June 25, 1999; Order 638, 65 FR 17400, Mar. 31, 2000; Order 676, 71 FR 26212, May 4, 2006]
### §2692. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out the purposes of this subchapter such sums as may be necessary.

(Pub. L. 94–469, title IV, §412, as added Pub. L. 102–550, title X, §1021(a), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3923.)
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10W










November 10, 2015


Celestica LLC
11 Continental Blvd., Bldg 300, Suite 103
Merrimack, NH 03054
Attention:  General Manager
Fax: 603-657-3004


Re:  Renewal of Agreement For Manufacture (as modified by Amendment No. 1) Between
LoJack Corporation and LoJack Equipment Ireland Limited, and Celestica LLC (the
		
	“Agreement”)
	 




Dear General Manager:


The parties agree to renew the Agreement for an additional term of two (2) years, commencing November 25, 2015.  Furthermore, the parties agree to negotiate in good faith the amendment of Section 9.1 Product Prices and Schedules 1 and 2 of the Agreement, for which the parties agree that a modification is necessary.  These changes will be memorialized in an amendment to the Agreement that the parties will use commercially reasonable efforts to execute prior to March 1, 2016. 


Please sign below where indicated and return a copy to my attention.  Thank you. 


Very truly yours, 


/s/ Scott Tripp


Scott Tripp
Vice President, Global Operations
LoJack Corporation


	
		
	Celestica LLC    

	By:
	/s/ Jason Phillips

	Print Name:
	Jason Phillips

	Title:
	Senior Vice President

	Date:
	11/17/2015



        	
		
	LoJack Equipment Ireland Limited

	By:
	/s/ Kenneth L. Dumas

	Print Name:
	Kenneth L. Dumas

	Title:
	SVP, CFO

	Date:
	11/12/2015






	
		
	LoJack Corporation

	By:
	/s/ Scott Tripp

	Print Name:
	Scott Tripp 

	Title:
	VP Global Operations    

	Date:
	11/12/2015



    















With a copy to:


Celestica International Inc.
844 Don Mills Road
Toronto, Ontario Canada M3C 1V7
Attention:  Corporate Contracts Department
Fax:  416-448-2776
§ 367.3970 Account 397, Communication equipment. ( a ) This account must include the cost installed of telephone, telegraph, and wireless equipment for general use in connection with service company operations.
( b ) This account must include the following items: ( 1 ) Amplifiers.
( 2 ) Antennae.
( 3 ) Booths.
( 4 ) Cables.
( 5 ) Carrier terminal equipment.
( 6 ) Conductors.
( 7 ) Distributing boards.
( 8 ) Extension cords.
( 9 ) Gongs.
( 10 ) Hand sets, manual and dial.
( 11 ) Insulators.
( 12 ) Intercommunicating sets.
( 13 ) Loading coils.
( 14 ) Microwave equipment.
( 15 ) Operators' desks.
( 16 ) Paraboloids.
( 17 ) Poles and fixtures used wholly for telephone or telegraph wire.
( 18 ) Power supply equipment.
( 19 ) Radio transmitting and receiving sets.
( 20 ) Reflectors.
( 21 ) Repeaters.
( 22 ) Remote control equipment and lines.
( 23 ) Sending keys.
( 24 ) Storage batteries.
( 25 ) Switchboards.
( 26 ) Telautograph circuit connections.
( 27 ) Telegraph receiving sets.
( 28 ) Telephone and telegraph circuits.
( 29 ) Testing instruments.
( 30 ) Towers.
( 31 ) Underground conduit used wholly for telephone or telegraph wires and cable wires.