alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 31 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 31

    Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign 
 military sale to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia certain defense articles 
                             and services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2019

Mr. Menendez (for himself, Mr. Graham, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Paul, Mr. Leahy, 
  Mr. Young, and Mr. Reed) introduced the following joint resolution; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign 
 military sale to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia certain defense articles 
                             and services.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the following proposed 
foreign military sale to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is prohibited:
            (1) The sale of the following defense articles, including 
        defense services and technical data, described in Transmittal 
        No. 18-31, submitted to Congress pursuant to section 36(b) of 
        the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(b)) and published 
        in the Congressional Record on June 4, 2019: The proposed sale 
        of spare and repair parts, United States Government and 
        contractor engineering, technical, and logistics support 
        services, and other related elements of program support for the 
        Tactical Air Surveillance System aircraft program.
                                 <all>
```
### SUBCHAPTER CXXV—STEENS MOUNTAIN COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT AND PROTECTION AREA
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Viasystems Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, David M. Sindelar, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ David M. Sindelar


David M. Sindelar


Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)


November 9, 2010
بھگوئیں

صاف نظر آنے 

والے ہاتھوں پر بھی 

نقصان دہ جراثیم ہو 

سکتے ہیں!

صابن لیں

اپنے ہاتھوں 

کو دھوئیں! رگڑیں

کھنگالیں

خشک کریں

 یہ مواد CDC کے ذریعہ تیار کیا گیا ہے۔ ’صاف ہاتھوں کے ساتھ زندگی بہتر ہوتی ہے‘ کی مہم CDC فاؤنڈیشن، GOJO، اور اسٹیپلز کے تعاون سے ممکن ہوئی ہے۔ 

CDC/HHS تجارتی پروڈکٹس، خدمات، یا کمپنیوں کی تصدیق نہیں کرتی ہے۔
First Department,

June, 1913.

#### William A. Avis and Another, Copartners, etc., Appellants, *v.*Rosa W. Straus, Individually and as Executrix, etc., of Louis Straus, Deceased, and Others, Respondents.

Practice— *money paid into court.*

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 7th day of October, 1912, directing the payment to the defendant Rosa W. Straus, individually, of certain money deposited in court to abide the event of this action.

Per Curiam:

We regard this money which the court has ordered to be paid as money paid into court to abide the result of an action to be brought; and that action having been brought and determined in favor of the defendant Rosa W. Straus, she is entitled, under the stipulation, to a return of the said money. If the money in question was not money paid into corut, the court would have no power by a summary order to direct its disposition. The provisions of rule 69 of the General Rules of Practice require that all orders directing the payment of money out of court shall direct the payment to be made to the person entitled to receive the same. Under this rule the moneymust be paidto’Rosa W. Straus, or to her attorney in fact. The order must, therefore, be modified by striking out the provision directing the money to be paid to her attorneys, and by further providing that this order is without prejudice to the rights of the plaintiffs or other creditors as against the defendant Rosa W. Straus. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Order modified as directed in opinion. Order to be settled on notice.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6211

MOSES A. EDMONDS, III,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LONNIE M. SAUNDERS, Warden of Augusta Correctional Center; LARRY W. HUFFMAN, Regional

Director of Northern Region,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CA-97-696-R)

Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: May 4, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Moses A. Edmonds, III, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Edmonds v. Saunders, No. CA-97-696-R (W.D. Va. Jan. 14,

1998). We also deny Appellant’s motion for appointment of counsel.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
CS 316439-D 04/24/2020

COVID-19에 관한 사실 공유

코로나바이러스(COVID-19)에 관한 사실을 파악하여 루머가 확산되지 않게 하십시오.

사실

1

검역 또는 격리에서 해제된

사람은 다른 사람을

감염시킬 위험이 없습니다.

사실

5

COVID-19의 증후와 증상을

파악함으로써 확산을 막을 수 있으며, 

여기에는 다음이 포함됩니다.

사실

4

귀하와 다른 사람의 건강을 위해 쉽게

실천할 수 있는 일들이 있습니다.

사실

2

질병은 인종과 민족에 상관

없이 모두를 아프게 할 수

있습니다.

•	발열

•	기침

•	호흡 곤란

귀하 또는 사랑하는 사람이 다음을 포함한 응급 경고

증후를 보일 경우 즉시 치료를 받으십시오.

•	호흡 곤란

•	지속적인 가슴의 통증 또는 압박

•	새롭게 발생하는 혼동 또는 깨어나지 못하는 경우

•	푸른 입술 또는 얼굴

목록은 모든 증후를 포함하지 않습니다. 중증이거나 우려되는

다른 모든 증상이 발생하는 경우 귀하의 의료서비스 제공자에게

문의하십시오.

CDC의 코로나바이러스 질병 2019 

웹페이지를 방문하여 최신 정보를

확인하십시오.

대부분의 사람은

COVID-19를 유발하는

바이러스로 인해 심각한

질병에 걸릴 즉각적인 위험이

적은 것으로 사료됩니다.

COVID-19에 대한 공포와 불안으로

인해 바이러스 확산 위험이 없어도 다른

사람을 피하거나 거부하게 됩니다.

고령의 성인과 모든 연령대의 중대한

기저 질환이 있는 사람은 COVID-19

로 인해 더 중대한 합병증 발생

위험이 더 큽니다.

•	특히 코를 풀거나 기침 또는 재채기를 한 후, 

화장실을 다녀온 후, 식사 또는 음식 조리 전에는

최소 20초간 비누와 물을 사용하여 자주 손을

닦습니다.

•	공공 장소에서는 입과 코를 가리는 면 마스크를

사용하십시오.

•	씻지 않은 손으로 눈, 코, 입을 만지지 마십시오.

•	아픈 경우 집에 머무르십시오.

•	기침 또는 재채기를 할 때는 티슈로 가리고, 티슈는

쓰레기통에 버리십시오.

사실

3

cdc.gov/coronavirus
§ 16.104 Exemption of Office of Special Counsel—Waco System. ( a ) The following system of records is exempted from subsections (c)(3) and (4); (d)(1), (2), (3), and (4); (e)(1), (2), (3), (5) and (8); and (g) of the Privacy Act pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j) and (k): CaseLink Document Database for Office of Special Counsel—Waco, JUSTICE/OSCW-001. These exemptions apply only to the extent that information in a record is subject to exemption pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j) and (k).
( b ) Only that portion of this system which consists of criminal or civil investigatory information is exempted for the reasons set forth from the following subsections: ( 1 ) *Subsection (c)(3).* To provide the subject of a criminal or civil matter or case under investigation with an accounting of disclosures of records concerning him or her would inform that individual of the existence, nature, or scope of that investigation and thereby seriously impede law enforcement efforts by permitting the record subject and other persons to whom he might disclose the records to avoid criminal penalties and civil remedies.
( 2 ) *Subsection (c)(4).* This subsection is inapplicable to the extent that an exemption is being claimed for subsection (d).
( 3 ) *Subsection (d)(1).* Disclosure of investigatory information could interfere with the investigation, reveal the identity of confidential sources, and result in an unwarranted invasion of the privacy of others.
( 4 ) *Subsection (d)(2).* Amendment of the records would interfere with ongoing criminal law enforcement proceedings and impose an impossible administrative burden by requiring criminal investigations to be continuously reinvestigated.
( 5 ) *Subsections (d)(3) and (4).* These subsections are inapplicable to the extent exemption is claimed from (d)(1) and (2).
( 6 ) *Subsections (e)(1) and (5).* It is often impossible to determine in advance if investigatory records contained in this system are accurate, relevant, timely and complete; but, in the interests of effective law enforcement, it is necessary to retain this information to aid in establishing patterns of activity and provide leads in criminal investigations.
( 7 ) *Subsection (e)(2).* To collect information from the subject individual would serve notice that he or she is the subject of criminal investigative or law enforcement activity and thereby present a serious impediment to law enforcement.
( 8 ) *Subsection (e)(3).* To inform individuals as required by this subsection would reveal the existence of an investigation and compromise law enforcement efforts.
( 9 ) *Subsection (e)(8).* To serve notice would give persons sufficient warning to evade law enforcement efforts.
( 10 ) *Subsection (g).* This subsection is inapplicable to the extent that the system is exempt from other specific subsections of the Privacy Act.
[Order No. 208-2000, 65 FR 75160, Dec. 1, 2000]
Exhibit 20.1
                                                     ------------


The Chase Manhattan Bank Grantor Trust 1995-A

From: The Chase Manhattan Bank

To:   Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.


                   MONTHLY CERTIFICATEHOLDER'S REPORT
                   ----------------------------------

Due Period 17 Beginning Date                     01/01/1997
Due Period 17 End Date                           01/31/1997
Determination Date                               02/10/1997
Remittance Date                                  02/18/1997


I.    Monthly Principal and Principal Carryover Shortfall to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                  $ 25.2335915528

II.   Monthly Interest and Unpaid Interest to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                   $ 2.5124014545

III.  Monthly Expenses Summary

      A. Servicing Fee Disbursement                                $ 628,242.59
      B. Cash Collateral Account Expense                                 $ 0.00
      C. Total Expenses paid
         (per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                $ 0.4187335758

IV.   Cash Collateral Account Deposit Amount                             $ 0.00

V.    Outstanding Advance Summary

      A. From Prior Period                                       $ 4,229,149.93
      B. From Current Period                                     $ 3,698,229.38
      C. Change in Amount Between Periods (Lines B - A)           $ -530,920.55

VI.   Pool Factor Information

      A. Certificate Principal Balance                         $ 716,032,148.89
      B. Initial Certificate Balance                         $ 1,500,339,658.38
      C. Pool Factor (Lines A / B)                               0.477246698700

VII.  Available Cash Collateral Account Information for Due Period

      A. Available Cash Collateral Amount                       $ 37,694,555.35
      B. Available Cash Collateral Amount Percentage            4.999999999867%

VIII. Required Cash Collateral Amount

      A. For the Current Collection Period                      $ 37,694,555.35
      B. For the Next Collection Period                         $ 35,801,607.44
### §230h. Change in name of Chalmette National Historical Park

The area described in the Act of October 9, 1962 (76 Stat. 755), as the "Chalmette National Historical Park" is hereby redesignated as the Chalmette Unit of the Jean Lafitte National Historical Park and Preserve. Any references to the Chalmette National Historical Park shall be deemed to be references to said Chalmette Unit.

(Pub. L. 95–625, title IX, §909, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3538; Pub. L. 111–11, title VII, §7105(f)(2)(B), Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1193.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of October 9, 1962 (76 Stat. 755), referred to in text, is Pub. L. 87–759, Oct. 9, 1962, 76 Stat. 755. Section 5 of that Act, which related to the boundaries of the Park, is set out as a note under section 231a of this title.

#### Amendments

2009—Pub. L. 111–11 substituted "Jean Lafitte National Historical Park and Preserve" for "Jean Lafitte National Historical Park".
### §2707. Authorizations

There are hereby authorized to be appropriated for each of the fiscal years ending September 30, 1978, September 30, 1979, and September 30, 1980, not to exceed $10,000,000 for loans to be made pursuant to section 2702 of this title, such funds to remain available until expended. There are hereby authorized to be appropriated for each of the fiscal years ending September 30, 1978, September 30, 1979, September 30, 1980, not to exceed $100,000,000 for loans to be made pursuant to section 2703 of this title, such funds to remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 95–617, title IV, §407, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3156.)
## ^ ^

stee l Dynamics , Inc :

757 5 WestJflffersof?Boulevar

d ^'"r'/ i r^'V i For t Wayne , Indian a 4680

4 (260 ) 989-3501 1 (260) 969-359 0 fa

x www.stBeldynamlcs.co m Augus t 26,201 0 Ms . Susa n Kurlan d Assistan t Secretar y for Aviatio n an dInternational Affair s U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 40 0 7" " St. , S W Washington , D.C . 2059 0 Dea r Ms . Kurland : I a mwritin g i n support

o f th e For t Wayne-Alle n Count

y Airport Authority' s applicatio n fo r th e Small CommvxaV

^ Ai r Servic e Developmen t

Progra m(Docke t

OST-2010-OI24) . Th e Authority i s takin g anove l an duniqu e approac h towar dencouragin g competitiv e activity andcos t reductio n amon g passenge r ai r servic e provider s a

t th e For t Wayn e Internationa l Airport (FWA) . Pleas e giv e thi s applicatio n ever y possibl e consideration . Th e geograph y o f th e For t Wayn e market present s adifficul t

challeng e for

passenge r

servic e developmen t

a t FWA . W e ar e surrounde db y larg e hu b airport s that provid e direc t

servic e t o anumber

o f destination s a s wel l a s medium-size dairport s that hav e th e advantag e o f

greate r competitio n tha

t help s t o kee p ticke t price s lowe r

i n thei r markets . Traditionall y airport s hav e sough t t o brin g i n low-cos t

carrier s o r

sel / thei r passenge r

servic e provider s o n additiona l destinations . Bot h o f thes e tactics hav e me t

wit h limite dsucces s i n thi s market . A s th e airlin e industry continue s t o consolidate , th e opportunitie s t o "sell " th e airline s o n expandin g thei r

ai r servic e t o smalle r

airport s ar e increasingl y difficuh . Th e Authority' s solutio n t o this proble mi s uniqu e an di s acredi t t o thei r focu s o n developin g appropriat e marke t researc h an didentifyin g creativ e application s fo r th e ai r servic e developmen t

challenge . I woul dlike t o expres s m

y stron g suppor

t for thi s applicatio n an dagai n urg e you t o giv e i t ever y possibl e ^consideration . Than k you . Sincere

Ben Ei \ Vic e P esiden t

- Human Resource s
1600 Sacramento Inn Way, Suite 232∙ Sacramento, CA 95821∙ Tel: (916) 463-0177 ∙ Fax: (916) 463-0190

www.calbcc.org

May 18, 2015

The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx

Secretary of Transportation

US Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE

Washington, DC 20590

The Honorable John F. Kerry

Secretary of State

US Department of State

2201 C Street NW

Washington, 20520

The Honorable Penny Priztker

Secretary of Commerce

US Department of Commerce

1401 Constitution Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20230

Dear Secretaries Kerry, Foxx and Pritzker:

On behalf of the members and supporters of the Black California Chamber of Commerce, I am 

writing to express my concern about the impact that government-subsidized expansion by stateowned airlines of Qatar and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) will have on the 400,000 jobs that 

are directly or indirectly connected to commercial aviation in California.

On an annual basis, the total economic contribution of commercial aviation to California’s 

economy is over $60 billion a year, which represents close to 2 percent of the total industrial 

output in the state. Every dollar of economic activity generated at a California airport will more 

than double that amount across the California economy. 

The state-owned Gulf airlines – Qatar Airways, Etihad Airways and Emirates Airline – have 

collectively received at least $42 billion dollars in government subsidies and other unfair benefits 

over the last ten years. These subsidies has enabled the Gulf carriers to divert passengers from 

U.S. airlines, which will reduce the introduction of new routes and could eliminate less 

profitable routes to smaller cities. Additionally, these subsidies have distorted capacity leading to 

an unbalanced marketplace – this will threaten thousands of high-paying American jobs.

The California Black Chamber of Commerce is asking that the U.S. government open 

consultations with Qatar and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) in order to address this serious 
 

1600 Sacramento Inn Way, Suite 232∙ Sacramento, CA 95821∙ Tel: (916) 463-0177 ∙ Fax: (916) 463-0190

www.calbcc.org

issue. We urge the U.S. government to immediately freeze the introduction of new passenger 

service by the gulf carriers during these consultations. The state of California and our members 

can’t afford to be negatively impacted by unfair airline competition with Gulf carriers.

Thank you for your consideration of this matter. 

Sincerely,

Aubry Stone, President/CEO
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.36


Director Compensation Summary Term Sheet


During calendar year 2015, each non-employee member of the Board was entitled to receive an aggregate of $85,000 in cash and restricted stock.  The cash portion of the compensation was paid quarterly in $10,000 increments.  The remainder of such compensation was paid in restricted shares of the Company’s Class A common stock, which shares vested December 31, 2015 to individuals who were on the Board on December 31, 2015.


During calendar year 2016, each non-employee member of the Board is entitled to receive an aggregate of $130,000 in cash and restricted stock.  The cash portion of the compensation will be paid quarterly in $10,000 increments.  The remainder of such compensation will be paid in restricted shares of the Company’s Class A common stock, and will vest on December 31, 2016 to individuals who are on the Board on December 31, 2016.


In addition to the foregoing, each non-employee director is entitled to receive $1,500 for each Board or committee meeting attended.  Further, the Chairman of each of the Executive Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and the Compensation Committee is paid an additional retainer of $2,500 per quarter.  The Chairman of the Board and the Chairman of the Audit Committee is each paid a retainer of $3,000 per quarter. In addition, the Chairman of the Board is entitled to receive a retainer of $90,000, payable quarterly in restricted shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock pursuant to the terms of the Crawford & Company Non-Employee Director Stock Plan.
LOAN AGREEMENT

This Agreement is made this 15th day of February, 1999 by and between John H.
Resing, Lender's Agent representing Crest Services Ltd. and John H. Resing,
Trustee FBO John H. Resing Retirement Trust (the "Lender") and Amalgamated
Explorations, Inc. (the "Company") for the purpose of setting forth the terms
and conditions upon which the Lender will advance funds to the Company.

NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

I . The Lender agrees to advance up to $450,000 to the Company in accordance
with the form of Promissory Note attached as Exhibit A.

2. Any advances against the Note will be secured by all assets of the Company
pursuant to the form of Security Agreement attached as Exhibit B. A UCC
financing statement pertaining to the Company's personal property will be filed
in Colorado, Wyoming, Nevada and Montana. Mortgages and/or deeds of trust
pertaining to the Company's oil, gas and mining properties will be filed in
such states with the applicable county clerks and recorders.

3. The Company agrees to issue to the Lender a warrant, in the form attached as
Exhibit C, to purchase one share of the Company's common stock for each two
dollars of principal advanced. The warrant will have an initial exercise price
of $0.50 per share and will be exercisable at any time prior to December 31,
2000.

4. The Company agrees to appoint John H. Resing as Chairman of the Board of
Directors of the Company and MSP Technologies. The compensation of $8,000 per
month payable to Milestone Capital as contemplated in the term sheet for the
$4.5 million equity financing between the Company and Milestone Capital will be
deferred pending the closing of the equity capital financing. Expenses
accumulated to date by Resing and Seed & Berry (approximately $30,000) will be
paid from the first advance against the Note.

5, The Company and MSP waive the conflicts inherent in Resing's role and
transactions in the future contemplated by the term sheet and the corporate
opportunity doctrine applied to any of Resing's business opportunities,
disclosed or undisclosed, that may have arisen prior to February 16, 1999 and
his duty to represent the lenders in this transaction.

The addresses of the parties are:

John H. Resing
P.O. Box 1317
Bellevue, WA 98009
V: (425) 454 7992
F: (425) 454 4073

Crest Services, Ltd.
c/o Jim Franklin
5256 Greenwich Dr. Suite 250
San Diego CA 92122
V: (619) 552 0295
F: (619) 552 0173


AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED

JOHN H. RESING, LENDER'S AGENT
REPRESENTING CREST SERVICE, LTD.

By: /S/
--------------------------------
JOHN H. RESING


JOHN H. RESING, FBO JOHN H. RESING
RETIREMENT TRUST

By: /S/
--------------------------------
JOHN H. RESING


AMALGAMATED EXPLORATIONS, INC.

By: /S/
--------------------------------
CHRISTIAN MURER, PRESIDENT