alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 29, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 29, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17D0493. WESLEY W. WILSON v. BERENICE GUERRERO.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

16A10596
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.1

The 1997 Stock Option Plan (the 1997 Stock Plan) was amended by the
Board of Directors on February 8, 2002 and approved by the shareholders on
April 30, 2002 to clarify that participation in the 1997 Option Plan is allowed
by all full-time and part-time employees of the Company and its subsidiaries.
Specifically, Section 2.7 of the 1997 Stock Option Plan is amended as follows:



| |  | "Eligible Persons means individuals who are (a) salaried employees
(including, without limitation, officers and directors who are also
employees) of the Company or one of its Subsidiaries, (b) Non-Employee
Directors, or (c) consultants to the Company.
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 41 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 41

 Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed export to the 
Government of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates and the United 
  Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland of technical data and 
                           defense services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2019

Mr. Menendez (for himself, Mr. Graham, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Paul, Mr. Leahy, 
  Mr. Young, and Mr. Reed) introduced the following joint resolution; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed export to the 
Government of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates and the United 
  Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland of technical data and 
                           defense services.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the issuance of an export 
license with respect to the following proposed export to the Kingdom of 
Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates is prohibited:
            (1) The transfer to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and United 
        Arab Emirates of the following license for export of technical 
        data and defense services, described in Executive Communication 
        1419 (EC-1419) submitted to Congress pursuant to section 36(c) 
        of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(c)) and 
        published in the Congressional Record on June 3, 2019: The 
        proposed technical assistance agreement providing technical 
        data and defense services to Saudi Arabia and United Arab 
        Emirates in support of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Ministry of 
        Defense Transformation Project.
                                 <all>
```
Corona viuresa bada alemata (COVID-19)

cdc.gov/coronavirus

316475-T 06/05/2020

COVID-19 bada alemate, danki eteke:

*Inema kaa COVID-19 bada alemata uliyala konitiya 

fanaka itetala hakima kotinikiša kitena kogošake.

• Hakeda tagama

• Urufiñala kokošamu baya 

kotika awu šenifa

• Košikinata kolangadana 

tabitana koša

• Taragadita awu 

lañalañama sa

• Udeya awu gajibeya 

šakata kofegeda

Kossa Molla ta Ula kire koñada

Hakeda tagama* Mena bora hakada awu 

baya amima dawuda

Mena kasaka košaša

Woyina alematowaye ayokomakimu tagimata kosanasi 

šoni kisana.bada allemate okonitinowa  woyina COVID-19 kolona 

biyayemu nokobinimala  uye 2-14ta kokošima uyela deya.

Ina dereña daye bubiye okonitinadame. Torinakema inema tagima awu tagama 

kesoma alemate minitiya hakimata yamu kesasa.

Tokoma
DENY; and Opinion Filed July 2 , 2015 . 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 15
- 00790
- CV IN RE JOHN CLOUD , Relator Original Proceeding from the 195th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F93
- 61603 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang

- Miers, Evans, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Lang

- Miers Relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus requesting that the Court order the trial court to conduct a hearing pursuant to rule 34.5(e) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure

. Rela tor was convicted of aggravated sexual assault of two children under age fourteen and sentenced to life imprisonment in each case. Cloud v. State , No. 05

– 96

– 00732

– CR, 1998 WL 227941, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Dallas May 8, 1998, pet. ref'd). We affirmed the convictions seventeen years ago

. Id. Relator now argues that “the record has been altered, amended, changed, redacted, and is not reliable” because th ere “are instruments spanning decades that conflict with the alleged RR [reporter’s record] from the trial, police reports show alteration, outcry stmt [statement] amended . . . .” To establish a right to mandamus relief in a criminal case, the relator m ust show that the trial court violated a ministerial duty and there is no adequate remedy at law. In re State ex rel.– 2

– Weeks, 391 S.W.3d 117, 122 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (orig. proceeding). We conclude relator has failed to establish his right to relief.

150790 F.P05 /Elizabeth Lang

- Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
Exhibit 99
                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Investors Insurance Group, Inc.(the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 1999 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Donald F. U. Goebert, Chief Executive Officer  and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
           or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
           of the Company.

                                      /s/ Donald F. U. Goebert
                                      ------------------------
                                      Donald F. U. Goebert
                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                      Chief Financial Officer

                                      August 14, 2002
### §207c. Additional lands from Lassen National Forest; authorization for road

The following described lands of the Lassen National Forest are hereby excluded from the forest and added to the Lassen Volcanic National Park:

Lots 1, 2, and 3, south half northeast quarter, and southeast quarter northwest quarter section 4; west half southeast quarter and those parts of the south half northwest quarter and of the southwest quarter of section 11 lying east of Lost Creek; and section 19, township 31 north, range 4 east, Mount Diablo meridian: Provided, That the aforesaid lands in section 19 are included within the national park subject to the right of the Secretary of Agriculture to construct and maintain a permanent road through such section in order to permit the use, protection, and administration of adjacent national forest lands and the removal of timber from the national forest.

(Pub. L. 87–129, Aug. 10, 1961, 75 Stat. 319.)
### §410aaa–24. Maps and legal description

Within six months after October 31, 1994, the Secretary shall file maps and legal 1 description of the park with the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the United States Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of the United States House of Representatives. Such maps and legal description shall have the same force and effect as if included in this part, except that the Secretary may correct clerical and typographical errors in such legal description and maps. The maps and legal description shall be on file and available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of the National Park Service, Department of the Interior.

(Pub. L. 103–433, title IV, §404, Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4488.)

1 So in original. Probably should be "a legal".
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-23-00593-CR

Thomas Carl Norman

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

24th District Court of Jackson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2304-11441

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed in part and 

reversed in part, and the cause remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the 

judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED and REMANDED IN 

PART, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with its 

opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 15, 2024
#### § 341.8 Terminal and other services.

Carriers must publish in their tariffs rules governing such matters as prorationing of capacity, demurrage, odorization, carrier liability, quality bank, reconsignment, in-transit transfers, storage, loading and unloading, gathering, terminalling, batching, blending, commingling, and connection policy, and all other charges, services, allowances, absorptions and rules which in any way increase or decrease the amount to be paid on any shipment or which increase or decrease the value of service to the shipper.
EXHIBIT 21

                   SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


Name                                       State of Incorporation

ART Holdings Corporation
f/k/a Acumenics Research & Technology, Inc.              Maryland

Aerospace Sciences, Inc.                                 Virginia

Engineering and Information Services, Inc.               Virginia

Performance Engineering Network, Inc.                    Virginia

SyCom Services, Inc.                                     Delaware

Hadron - CPD, Inc. (inactive)                            Virginia

P.E.N. Acquisition Corporation (inactive)                Virginia

Telcom International, Inc. (inactive)                    Delaware

Applied Graphics Corporation (inactive)                  Maryland
 
Compulaser, Inc. (inactive)                              Delaware
 
Digitcom, Inc. (inactive)                                    Ohio

G. E. Boggs and Associates, Inc. (inactive)              Maryland

<PAGE>
Stewart D. Gregg, Senior Securities Counsel
Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America
5701 Golden Hills Drive
Minneapolis, MN  55416
(763) 765-2913

July 21, 2009

Board of Directors

Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America
5701 Golden Hills Drive
Minneapolis, MN  55416

Re:    Opinion and Consent of Counsel
       Allianz Life Variable Account B

Dear Sir or Madam:

You have requested my Opinion of Counsel in connection with the filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, of Post-Effective Amendment No. 18 to the Registration Statement on
Form N-4 for the Individual Deferred Variable Annuity Contracts to be issued by
Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America and its separate account,
Allianz Life Variable Account B File No. 333-139701.

I am of the following opinions:

1.  Allianz Life Variable Account B is a unit investment trust as that term is
    defined in Section 4(2) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the Act), and
    is currently registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
    pursuant to Section 8(a) of the Act.
2.  Upon the acceptance of purchase payments made by a Contract Owner pursuant
    to a Contract issued in accordance with the Prospectus contained in the
    Registration Statement and upon compliance with applicable law, such a
    Contract Owner will have a legally-issued, fully-paid, non-assessable
    contractual interest under such Contract.

You may use this opinion letter, or copy hereof, as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement.

I consent to the reference to me and to this opinion under the caption "Legal
Opinions" contained in the Statement of Additional Information which form a part
of the Registration Statement.

Sincerely,

ALLIANZ LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA

BY: /S/ STEWART D. GREGG
Stewart D. Gregg
### §3199. Navigation aids and other facilities

#### (a) Existing facilities

Within conservation system units established or expanded by this Act, reasonable access to, and operation and maintenance of, existing air and water navigation aids, communications sites and related facilities and existing facilities for weather, climate, and fisheries research and monitoring shall be permitted in accordance with the laws and regulations applicable to units of such systems, as appropriate. Reasonable access to and operation and maintenance of facilities for national defense purposes and related air and water navigation aids within or adjacent to such areas shall continue in accordance with the laws and regulations governing such facilities notwithstanding any other provision of this Act. Nothing in the Wilderness Act [16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.] shall be deemed to prohibit such access, operation and maintenance within wilderness areas designated by this Act.

#### (b) New facilities

The establishment, operation, and maintenance within any conservation system unit of new air and water navigation aids and related facilities, facilities for national defense purposes, and related air and water navigation aids, and facilities for weather, climate, and fisheries research and monitoring shall be permitted but only (1) after consultation with the Secretary or the Secretary of Agriculture, as appropriate, by the head of the Federal department or agency undertaking such establishment, operation, or maintenance, and (2) in accordance with such terms and conditions as may be mutually agreed in order to minimize the adverse effects of such activities within such unit.

(Pub. L. 96–487, title XIII, §1310, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2481.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 96–487, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2371, known as the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3101 of this title and Tables.

The Wilderness Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 88–577, Sept. 3, 1964, 78 Stat. 890, which is classified generally to chapter 23 (§1131 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1131 of this title and Tables.
grant a continuance, see Evans, 117 Nev. at 638, 28 P.3d at 518 (the 

district court does not abuse its discretion "absent a showing that the 

State acted in bad faith or that the nondisclosure caused substantial 

prejudice to the defendant"), we conclude that these claims lack merit. 

Second, Robbins argues that his conviction for first-degree 

kidnapping with the use of a deadly weapon cannot stand because it was 

incidental to the underlying robbery. We disagree. The jury heard 

evidence that either Robbins or his accomplice attacked the victim with a 

crowbar, shocked him with a taser, and bound his wrists with an electrical 

cord. The victim was held down and beaten further by one of the suspects 

while the other removed goods from the home. After the victim told the 

suspects where his wallet was, either Robbins or his accomplice forced the 

victim upstairs—away from the open front door—and stated that he was 

going kill him. The jury was properly instructed pursuant to Mendoza v. 

State, 122 Nev. 267, 275-76, 130 P.3d 176, 181 (2006), and we conclude 

that a rational juror could have found that the kidnapping was not 

incidental to the robbery, see Langford v. State, 95 Nev. 631, 638-39, 600 

P.2d 231, 236-37 (1979) (where adequately instructed, the question of 

whether the movement of the victim is incidental to the robbery is "to be 

determined by the jury in all but the clearest cases"). 

Third, relying on NRS 50.075, Robbins argues that the district 

court abused its discretion by restricting him from cross-examining the 

Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department's Forensic Laboratory 

technician who performed the DNA testing in this case regarding mistakes 

and malfeasance committed by other lab technicians. "The decision to 

admit or exclude evidence rests within the trial court's discretion, and this 

court will not overturn that decision absent manifest error." Collman v. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2 

9. 
arraguirre 

J. 

- - • '' - 41: , .4 1• - II r • r= ETZE IEA 

State, 116 Nev. 687, 702, 7 P.3d 426, 436 (2000). Here, the district court 

prohibited this line of questioning because the witness had no personal 

knowledge of the specific instances of mistakes and malfeasance 

committed by other technicians, but allowed the defense to cross-examine 

her regarding the potential for human error generally. We conclude that 

the district court did not abuse its discretion. See NRS 50.025(1)(a). 

Having considered Robbins' contentions and concluded that 

they lack merit, we 

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 

/ .e.e...40t..\ 

Hardesty 

CHERRY, J., concurring: 

I concur in the result. 

J. 

erry 

cc: Hon. Carolyn Ellsworth, District Judge 

The Law Office of Dan M. Winder, P.C. 

Mario D. Valencia 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

3
§ 367.54 Expenditures on leased property. ( a ) The cost of substantial initial improvements (including repairs, rearrangements, additions, and betterments) made to prepare service company property leased to be used for a period of more than one year, and the cost of subsequent substantial additions, replacements, or betterments to the property, must be charged to the service company property account appropriate for the class of property leased. If the service life of the improvements is terminable by action of the lease, the cost, less net salvage, of the improvements must be spread over the life of the lease by charges to account 404, Amortization of limited-term service property (§ 367.4040). However, if the service life is not terminated by action of the lease but by depreciation proper, the cost of the improvements, less net salvage, must be accounted for as depreciable property. The provisions of this paragraph are applicable to property leased under either capital leases or operating leases.
( b ) If improvements made to property leased for a period of more than one year are of relatively minor cost, or if the lease is for a period of not more than one year, the cost of the improvements must be charged to the account in which the rent is included, either directly or by amortization.
§ 544.82 General program characteristics. ( a ) The Supervisor of Education shall assure that the following minimum criteria are met for the institution's education program set forth in § 544.81. ( 1 ) There is a written curriculum which establishes measurable behavioral objectives and procedures.
( 2 ) There are clear criteria which establish minimum expectations for program completion, as well as provisions for the assessment of student progress.
( 3 ) There are provisions for periodic review of the relevancy and effectiveness of the program.
( 4 ) Unless unusual circumstances (e.g., college credit courses) exist, all programs should allow for open entry and exit, at least on a monthly basis.
( 5 ) The Supervisor of Education may establish other requirements necessary to assure that the stated goals of the program are achieved.
( b ) Upon an inmate's completion of a program specified in § 544.81, staff may issue and/or review and file a certificate when it contributes to an inmate's future plans in such a way that it validates the inmate's education and training; supports the inmate's chances of securing employment; improves the inmate's acceptance for advanced education; or enhances the inmate's opportunity for success in any other activity the inmate chooses to pursue. The certificate will confirm that the inmate has completed the requirements to receive a certificate that fits one or a combination of the following categories: ( 1 ) Accredited certificates—high school diplomas and occupation training certificates approved or issued through local school districts, state departments of education, or other recognized accrediting educational organizations;
( 2 ) Postsecondary certificates and transcripts—postsecondary degrees or course certificates approved or issued through a sponsoring accredited educational institution;
( 3 ) General Educational Development tests—programs sponsored by the American Council on Education;
( 4 ) Private certificates—outside agencies, private business and industry, other than those stated in paragraph (b)(1) of this section;
( 5 ) Institutional certificates—approved general education, occupation training, recreation, adult continuing education and social education certificates, issued to an inmate who completes a program, and when the institution cannot provide a certificate as provided in paragraphs (b) (1) and (4) of this section; or
( 6 ) Transcripts—issued to an inmate who completes general education programs, formal occupation training, on-the-job and apprentice training and work assignments. With the inmate's consent, transcripts may be sent to schools and colleges, business, industries and other agencies.
### §251d. Applicability to privately owned lands

The provisions of sections 251b to 251d of this title shall not be applicable with respect to any privately owned lands lying within the exterior boundaries of the Olympic National Park which are within township 23 north, range 10 west; township 23 north, range 9 west; township 24 north, range 9 west; and township 24 north, range 8 west, West Willamette meridian; and lot 5 of the July Creek lot survey consisting of .15 acre, and lot 12 of the July Creek lot survey consisting of .35 acre.

(Pub. L. 85–455, §3, June 11, 1958, 72 Stat. 185.)
### §3. Oath of Comptroller

The Comptroller of the Currency shall, within fifteen days from the time of notice of his appointment, take and subscribe the oath of office.

(R.S. §326; Pub. L. 86–251, §1(d), Sept. 9, 1959, 73 Stat. 488; Pub. L. 92–310, title II, §223(a), June 6, 1972, 86 Stat. 206.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §326 derived from act June 3, 1864, ch. 106, §1, 13 Stat. 99, which was the National Bank Act. See section 38 of this title.

#### Amendments

1972—Pub. L. 92–310 struck out provisions which required the Comptroller to give a bond in the sum of $250,000.

1959—Pub. L. 86–251 increased the surety bond requirement from $100,000 to $250,000.