alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 0

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

#### § 0.23a [Reserved]
---

---

Exhibit 8.1

# List of Significant
Subsidiaries and Portfolio Investments

|Subsidiary                                     | Country of
Incorporation | Proportion of Ownership Interest                                            
|---------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Franz Kalff GmbH                               |                          |                                                                             
|Mersa Holdings B.V                             | The Netherlands          | 100% held by Robomatix                                                      
|Franz Kalff GmbH                               | Germany                  | 100% held by Mersa                                                          
|Primacura Verwaltungs GmbH                     | Germany                  | 100% held by Franz Kalff                                                    
|eLady Ltd.                                     |                          |                                                                             
|Hillsborough Holdings B.V                      | The Netherlands          | Approximately 90% held by Robomatix                                         
|Niponet Holdings Ltd.                          | Israel                   | Approximately 36% held by Robomatix                                         
|Birkale Investments B.V                        | The Netherlands          | Approximately 80.5% held by Niponet                                         
|Belas Holdings B.V                             | The Netherlands          | Approximately 11% held by Birkale and approximately 27% held by Hillsborough
|eLady Ltd.                                     | Japan                    | Approximately 84.7% held by Belas                                           
|Dirad Technologies (1999) Ltd.                 |                          |                                                                             
|Leader Tech Ltd.                               | Israel                   | Approximately 4.4% held by Robomatix                                        
|Dirad Technologies (1999) Ltd.                 | Israel                   | 100% held by Leader Tech                                                    
|Dirad Management Technologies(2000) Ltd.       | Israel                   | 5% held by Robomatix                                                        
|Israel Land Development InsuranceCompany Ltd.  | Israel                   | Approximately 2.4% held by Robomatix                                        
|ICIC - The Israel Credit InsuranceCompany Ltd. | Israel                   | Approximately 5.3% held by Robomatix                                        



---

---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Aurizon Mines Ltd. (the Company) is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report).

I, David P. Hall, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ David P. Hall   David P. Hall
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

March 31, 2009



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Aurizon Mines Ltd. and will be retained by Aurizon Mines Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                         114,869
<SECURITIES>                                 3,007,464
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,283,786
<ALLOWANCES>                                    75,000
<INVENTORY>                                  4,784,568
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,084,981
<PP&E>                                      82,247,336
<DEPRECIATION>                              59,274,250
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              46,924,748
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,568,758
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,219,195
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,869,928
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                46,924,748
<SALES>                                    128,496,511
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           129,522,794
<CGS>                                       58,922,656
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              123,651,235
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                65,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,871,559
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,171,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,700,559
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,700,559
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
        

</TABLE>
### SUBCHAPTER III—RESOURCE ENHANCEMENT
EXHIBIT
32.2
  Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of
2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Teliphone Corp.. (the “Company”) on Form
10–Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George Metrakos,
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:
  1.      
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.      
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
  /s/
      George MetrakosGeorge
      Metrakos
                Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer
 
 Dated: May 15,
2009
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 725 

To change the address of the postal facility designated in honor of Captain 

Humayun Khan. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 7, 2019 

Mr. KAINE (for himself and Mr. WARNER) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed 

A BILL 

To change the address of the postal facility designated in 

honor of Captain Humayun Khan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CAPTAIN HUMAYUN KHAN POST OFFICE. 

4 Section 1(a) of Public Law 115–347 (132 Stat. 

5 5054) is amended by striking ‘‘180 McCormick Road’’ and 

6 inserting ‘‘2150 Wise Street’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
IN IT I AL REVI EW ENG I NEERI NG R EPORT PMN : 15 - 0378 Focus R eady Draft 5 / 1 8/20 1 5

MSDS : Yes Labe l : No Gen Eqpt : Gloves f or repea t ed or pro l o n ged expos u re : N i tr i le r u bber (NBR), t h ic k ness : > 0 . 56 mm, brea k t hrough time : up to 480 mi n /G l oves for short te r m expos u re : N i t r i l e rubber (NBR) , t h ic k ness : 0 . 1 mm , b r ea k t h rough time : u p t o 30 m in /Wear eye/face pro t ect i on s u ch as chemi ca l sp l as h proof gogg l es o r f ace sh i e l d . /Wear impermeab l e g l oves a n d s u i table pro t ec t ive c l oth ing . /Loca l exh aus t ven t i l ation Resp ir ator : Fu ll Face Mas k w i th organ ic vapor cartridge , T ype A f ilter (BP >65°C)/Recommended respirato r s shou l d be ce r tifi ed by NIOS H H

ea l t h E f f ec t s : May cau se a n a ll erg i c ski n reac t ion/Aquat i c t ox i ci t y/May cau se s k in i r r itat i on or sensit i za t ion TLV/ PE L : None estab l ished .Re l ated C A

n a l ogs : Migrat 5/08/ 2 0 1 5) : PBT ra ti ng : P l B l T2 H

ea l t h : 1 - 2 Dermal, I n h a l a t ion E co : 1 No releases to wate rOCCU PAT I ONAL EXPOSURE RAT I NG : 2 - 3C NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTI ONS :

POLLUT ION PREVENT I ON CONS I D ERAT I ONS : No n e . EXPOSURE - BAS E D R EVI EW : NoIN I T I AL REVI EW ENG I NEER I NG REPORT PMN : 1 PROC : Numbe unknown site Days/yr : 1 2 1

### I n ha l a t i on : n eIN I T I AL REVI E W ENG I NEER I NG REPORT PMN : 

### unknown site(s) Days/yr : 250
ACCEPTED

04-14-00609-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

4/20/2015 4:39:52 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 04/20/2015 4:39:52 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pear Network,  Inc., on Form
10-QSB for the period  ending  June 30,  2003 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the  "REPORT"),  the  undersigned,
Christopher C. Corwin,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ Christopher C. Corwin
Christopher C. Corwin
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2012331EN.01001201.xml

| 27.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 September 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Central Administrativo Sul — Portugal) — Portugal Telecom SGPS, SA v Fazenda Pública

(Case C-496/11) (1)

(VAT - Sixth Directive - Articles 17(2) and 19 - Deductions - VAT due or paid for services acquired by a holding company - Services having a direct, immediate and unequivocal relationship with taxable output transactions)

(2012/C 331/18)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Central Administrativo Sul

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Portugal Telecom SGPS SA

Defendant: Fazenda Pública

Intervening party: Ministério Público

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal Central Administrativo Sul — Interpretation of Article 17(2) of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Deductions — Tax incurred or paid for services acquired by a holding — Services with a direct, immediate and unequivocal relationship with taxable transactions downstream

Operative part of the judgment

Article 17(2) and (5) Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment must be interpreted as meaning that a holding company such as that at issue in the main proceedings which, in addition to its main activity of managing shares in companies in which it holds all or part of the share capital, acquires goods and services which it subsequently invoices to those companies is authorised to deduct the amount of input VAT provided that the input services acquired have a direct and immediate link with the output economic transactions giving rise to a right to deduct. Where those goods and services are used by the holding company in order to perform both economic transactions giving rise to a right to deduct and economic transactions which do not, the deduction is allowed only in respect of the part of the VAT which is proportional to the amount relating to the former transactions and the national tax authorities are authorised to provide for one of the methods for determining the right to deduct in Article 17(5). Where those goods and services are used both for economic and non-economic activities, Article 17(5) of the Sixth Directive is not applicable and the methods of deduction and apportionment are to be defined by the Member States which, in exercising that power, must take account of the purpose and general scheme of the Sixth Directive and, on that basis, lay down a method of calculation which objectively reflects the input expenditure actually attributed to each of those two activities.

---

(1)  OJ C 362, 10.12.2011.

---
§ 2.41 Travel approval. ( a ) The probation officer may approve travel outside the district without approval of the Commission in the following situations: ( 1 ) Vacation trips not to exceed thirty days.
( 2 ) Trips, not to exceed thirty days, to investigate reasonably certain employment possibilities.
( 3 ) Recurring travel across a district boundary, not to exceed fifty miles outside the district, for purpose of employment, shopping, or recreation.
( b ) Specific advance approval by the Commission is required for all foreign travel, employment requiring recurring travel more than fifty miles outside the district (except employment at offshore locations), and vacation travel outside the district exceeding thirty days. A request for such permission shall be in writing and must demonstrate a substantial need for such travel.
( c ) A special condition imposed by the Regional Commissioner prohibiting certain travel shall supersede any general rules relating to travel as set forth above.
[42 FR 39809, Aug. 5, 1977, as amended at 44 FR 3408, Jan. 16, 1979; 48 FR 9247, Mar. 4, 1983; 57 FR 59916, Dec. 17, 1992]
(61 South. 869.)

No. 19,867.

#### BOARD OF COM’RS OF FIFTH LOUISIANA LEVEE DIST. v. HOPS.

(April 28, 1913.)

Appeal from Tenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Concordia; John E. Clayton, Judge ad hoc.

Action by the Board of Commissioners of Fifth Louisiana Levee District against Frank W. Hops. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs appeal.

Dismissed.

Jeff B. Snyder (John S. Boatner, Jr., of Vidalia, of counsel), for appellant. Calhoun & Calhoun. of Vidalia, and W. M. Murphy, of St. Louis, Mo., for appellee.

SOMMERVILLE, J.

For the reasons given in case No. 19.864, entitled Board of Commissioners of Fifth Louisiana Levee District v. Howard Land & Timber Co., 61 South. 868, ante, p. 911, this day decided:

It is ordered that this appeal be dismissed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not pre cedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 T H

C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-21109

WINNIE PIPELINE COMPANY.;

SOUTHEASTERN MARKETING COMPANY., Plaintiffs-Appellees,

versus

KENNETH PATTERSON, ET AL.,
Defendants,

KENNETH PATTERSON, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(H-93-CV-2677)

April 10, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, REYNALDO G. G ARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Kenneth Patterson appeals the denial of his motion to dismiss, an injunction

prohibiting him from prosecuting his wrongful execution lawsuit and the retention

of certain funds in the registry of the court. We first note that we lack appellate2 See Woods v. Smith , 60 F.3d 1161 (5th Cir. 1995)

3 See Jarvis H. Christian College v. Exxon Corp . 845 F.2d 523 (5th Cir. 1988).

2 jurisdiction to review the trial court’s refusal to dismiss pendent state law claims

in a setting as is here presented. 2 Further, subsequent to the issuance of the

injunction, Patterson’s wrongful execution suit was transferred to the Southern

District of Texas and consolidated with the instant case, thus mooting the appealed

injunction. 3 Finally, no justiciable issue exists as to the retention of funds.

For lack of jurisdiction, this appeal must be and is DISMISSED.
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 52 

To correct the enrollment of S. 3312. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 14, 2020 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself and Mr. BLUMENTHAL) submitted the following 

concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

To correct the enrollment of S. 3312. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of S. 3312, an Act 

3 to establish a crisis stabilization and community reentry 

4 grant program, and for other purposes, the Secretary of 

5 the Senate shall— 

6 (1) in section 3051(a) of title I of the Omnibus 

7 Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as 

8 added by section 2 of the Act, strike ‘‘, for use by 

9 State and local correctional facilities,’’ and insert ‘‘, 

10 Indian Tribes, units of local government, and com11 munity-based nonprofit organizations’’; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 52 ATS 

1 (2) in section 3051(b)(1)(B) of title I of the 

2 Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 

3 1968, as added by section 2 of the Act, strike ‘‘of4 fenders’’ and insert ‘‘individuals’’; 

5 (3) in the section heading for section 3052 of 

6 title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 

7 Streets Act of 1968, as added by section 2 of the 

8 Act, strike ‘‘STATE’’; 

9 (4) in section 3052(a) of title I of the Omnibus 

10 Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as 

11 added by section 2 of the Act, in the matter pre12 ceding paragraph (1), strike ‘‘, or such agency as 

13 the chief executive may designate,’’ and insert ‘‘, In14 dian Tribe, unit of local government, or community15 based non-profit organization’’; 

16 (5) in section 3052(a)(3) of title I of the Omni17 bus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as 

18 added by section 2 of the Act, in the matter pre19 ceding subparagraph (A), after ‘‘State’’ insert ‘‘, 

20 Tribal, or local’’; 

21 (6) in section 3052(b)(1) of title I of the Omni22 bus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as 

23 added by section 2 of the Act— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•SCON 52 ATS 

1 (A) after ‘‘State’’ insert ‘‘, Indian Tribe, 

2 unit of local government, or community-based 

3 nonprofit organization’’; and 

4 (B) after ‘‘facility’’ insert ‘‘and adopt poli5 cies that focus on programming, strategies, and 

6 educational components for reducing recidivism 

7 and probation violations’’; 

8 (7) in the section heading for section 3053 of 

9 title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 

10 Streets Act of 1968, as added by section 2 of the 

11 Act, strike ‘‘STATE’’; and 

12 (8) in section 3054 of title I of the Omnibus 

13 Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as 

14 added by section 2 of the Act, after ‘‘State’’ insert 

15 ‘‘, Indian Tribe, unit of local government, or commu16 nity-based nonprofit organization’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
§ 36.402 Alterations. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) Any alteration to a place of public accommodation or a commercial facility, after January 26, 1992, shall be made so as to ensure that, to the maximum extent feasible, the altered portions of the facility are readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities, including individuals who use wheelchairs.
( 2 ) An alteration is deemed to be undertaken after January 26, 1992, if the physical alteration of the property begins after that date.
( b ) *Alteration.* For the purposes of this part, an alteration is a change to a place of public accommodation or a commercial facility that affects or could affect the usability of the building or facility or any part thereof. ( 1 ) Alterations include, but are not limited to, remodeling, renovation, rehabilitation, reconstruction, historic restoration, changes or rearrangement in structural parts or elements, and changes or rearrangement in the plan configuration of walls and full-height partitions. Normal maintenance, reroofing, painting or wallpapering, asbestos removal, or changes to mechanical and electrical systems are not alterations unless they affect the usability of the building or facility.
( 2 ) If existing elements, spaces, or common areas are altered, then each such altered element, space, or area shall comply with the applicable provisions of appendix A to this part.
( c ) *To the maximum extent feasible.* The phrase “to the maximum extent feasible,” as used in this section, applies to the occasional case where the nature of an existing facility makes it virtually impossible to comply fully with applicable accessibility standards through a planned alteration. In these circumstances, the alteration shall provide the maximum physical accessibility feasible. Any altered features of the facility that can be made accessible shall be made accessible. If providing accessibility in conformance with this section to individuals with certain disabilities (e.g., those who use wheelchairs) would not be feasible, the facility shall be made accessible to persons with other types of disabilities (e.g., those who use crutches, those who have impaired vision or hearing, or those who have other impairments).