alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 0

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

#### § 0.64-4 Delegation respecting temporary transfers, in custody, of certain prisoner-witnesses from a foreign country to the United States to testify in Federal or State criminal proceedings.

The Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Division, in consultation with the Assistant Attorney General for National Security in matters related to the National Security Division's activities, is authorized to exercise all of the power and authority vested in the Attorney General under 18 U.S.C. 3508 that has not been delegated to the Director of the United States Marshals Service under 28 CFR 0.111a, including specifically the authority to determine whether and under what circumstances temporary transfer of a prisoner-witness to the United States is appropriate or inappropriate; to determine the point at which the witness should be returned to the transferring country; and to enter into appropriate agreements with the transferring country regarding the terms and conditions of the transfer. The Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Division is authorized to redelegate this authority within the Criminal Division to the Deputy Assistant Attorneys General and to the Director and Deputy Directors of the Office of International Affairs.

[Order No. 2865-2007, 72 FR 10066, Mar. 7, 2007]
C O U R T O F A P P E A LS EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEXAS ELPASO, TEXAS SHAWN CODY COL EMAN, Ap pe lla nt,
v.
TH E ST AT E O F TE XA S, Appellee
. § § § § § § No . 0 8- 10 -0 02 97 -C R

Appea l from the 42 1s t Judi c ia l D ist

ri c t Co ur t of Ca ldw e ll Co un ty , T e xas (TC#2005-240)

M EM OR

AN DU M OP IN ION Shawn Cody

Coleman appe als his conviction, following a motion to adjudicate, f or ag g ravated assault with a de adly wea pon, and possession of a

prohibited wea

pon. Appellant wa s sentenc ed to serve twelve a nd seven year s concur

rently , in the instit utional divisi on of the Te x as Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice. Aff irmed Ap pe lla nt’ s a pp ointe d c ouns e l, h a s f

ile d a br ie f i n whic h h e c on c lud e s th at th e a pp e a l is frivolous and without merit. Appellate counsel states that he has studied the r ecor d and has f ound
no err or pre serve d for a

ppeal that c ould serve a s g rounds for r ever sible err or. The br ief mee ts the require ments of An de rs v . Ca lif or nia , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.C t. 1396, 18 L .Ed.2d 493, reh. denie d , 388 U.S. 924, 87 S.C t. 2094, 18 L .Ed.2d 1377 (1967), by prese nting a

profe ssional evaluation of the re cord, a

nd demonstratingwhy , in effe ct, there are no arguable grounds to be adva nced. See Hi gh v . S tate , 573 S.W .2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App.1978). A copy of counse l’s brief ha s been de liv e re d to Ap pe lla

nt, and Ap pe lla nt h a s b e e n a dv ise d o f h is r ig ht t o e xami ne the a pp e llate
rec ord and f

ile a pro se brief. N o pr o s e brief ha s been f iled.-2-

An appe llate cour

t may not addre ss the merits of issues ra ised in an An de rs br ie f, or tho se raised in a pro se response . Ble ds oev . S tate , 178 S.W .3d 824, 826-27 (Te x .Crim.App. 2005). The Court may

only consider: ( 1) whe ther the a ppeal is wholly

frivolous, and issue a

n opinion explaining that we ha

ve re viewed the rec ord and f ound no reve rsible er

ror; or ( 2) whe ther arguable grounds for a

ppeal e x ist, and if so, remand the case to the trial court so that ne w counse l may be appointed to a ddress those issues. Bledsoe , 178 S.W .3d at 826-27. Havingcar efully

revie wed the r ecor d and counse l’s brief in this ca se, we ag ree that the appea l is wholly

frivolous and without merit. Fur ther, we find nothing in the r ecor d that might arguably support the appe al. Acc ording ly , the trial cour t’s judgme nt is affirmed.

October 5, 2011 DAVI D WEL L I NGTONCHEW, C hief Just ice B e f o r e C h e w , C
. J. , M c C l ur e , a n d R i v e r a , JJ. (Do Not Publish)
#### John H. Smith, Respondent, v. Benjamin E. Valentine, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Francisco Calibretto, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction in the County Court of Kings county reversed and ne.w trial ordered, on the ground that the ruling at folios 145, 146 and 147 of the record was prejudicial error. Jenks, P. J., Carr and Stapleton, JJ., concurred; Burr and Rich, JJ., dissented.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Find Upcoming Events 

# Find upcoming events

## Search results

31 - 40 of 1707 events

        Resource Partner event      

### Lexington Strong Women - Strong Coffee

Tuesday, April 16, 20249:00- 10:30 a.m. EDT

        Resource Partner event      

### Blue Print Business Plan Workshop

Tuesday, April 16, 20249:00 a.m.- 12:30 p.m. EDT

        SBA event      

### Powering Rural - The Heartland Tour - Newton County

Tuesday, April 16, 20248:00- 10:00 a.m. CDT

        SBA event      

### Woman-Owned Small Business Certification (WOSB)

Tuesday, April 16, 20249:00- 11:00 a.m. EDT

        Resource Partner event      

### NSF SBIR Interactive Workshop

2024-04-17T12:30:00-04:00>              Tuesday, April 16, 2024  -                Wednesday, April 17, 2024              8:30 am -                  11:30 am CDT                

        Resource Partner event      

### DIVAS IN THE TRUCKING INDUSTRY

Tuesday, April 16, 20249:30- 10:30 a.m. EDT

        Resource Partner event      

### Women in Business Coffee Chat

Tuesday, April 16, 20249:30- 10:30 a.m. EDT

        Resource Partner event      

### NSF SBIR Interactive Workshop

2024-04-17T12:30:00-04:00>              Tuesday, April 16, 2024  -                Wednesday, April 17, 2024              8:30 am -                  11:30 am CDT                

        Resource Partner event      

### How to Complete a GSA Schedule 

Tuesday, April 16, 20249:00 a.m.- 12:00 p.m. CDT

        Resource Partner event      

### BizGap Info Session

Tuesday, April 16, 202410:00- 10:30 a.m. EDT

#### Pagination

-  Previous 
-                  Page              1 
-                  Page              2 
-                  Page              3 
-                  Current page              4 
-                  Page              5 
-                  Page              6 
-                  Page              7 
-                  Page              8 
-                  Page              9 
-  ... 
-  Next
#### §§ 35.152-35.159 [Reserved]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Darren Williams, Also Known as Darren Flowers, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 345]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), rendered October 28, 2004, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentencing.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Reversal of the defendant’s conviction is not warranted on the ground that he was compelled to testify before the grand jury while in restraints *(see People v Rouse,*79 NY2d 934 [1992]; *People v Mendola, 2*NY2d 270 [1957]; *People v Neubauer,*296 AD2d 557 [2002]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Miller, J.E, Ritter, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  For Partners 
-  Lenders 
-  7(a) Loan Program 
-  7(a) Secondary Market 

## Section navigation

-  Lenders    -  7(a) loan program      -  Operate as a 7(a) lender 
    -  Types of 7(a) loans 
    -  Pilot loan programs 
    -  Secondary market 
    -  Terms, conditions, and eligibility 
  -  CDC/504 loan program 
  -  Microloan program 
  -  Become an SBA lender 
  -  Lender reports 
  -  Training on demand 
-  Counselors 
-  SBICs 
-  Surety bond partners and agents 
-  Contracting officials 

# 7(a) secondary market

----

## Content

----

## SBA Secondary Market Program and Securitization Guide

The Secondary Market Program and Securitization Guide outlines the methods for Secondary Market sales of loan and pool certificate interests. The Guide also explains the primary functions of SBA’s Fiscal and Transfer Agent (FTA) and the securitization of unguaranteed loan interests into separate securities.

## Secondary Participation Guaranty Agreement

Lenders participate in the Secondary Market Program by using SBA Form 1086 (executed by the lender, the investor, the Fiscal Transfer Agent, and SBA) to sell the guaranteed portion of a loan.

This Secondary Participation Guaranty Agreement is a contract that details the terms and conditions of the sale of the guaranteed portion of an SBA loan. The document provides sale data and related rights and responsibilities of all parties to the transaction and is used for each individual loan sale made by an SBA Lender.  

## Active 7(a) loan pool assemblers

SBA maintains an updated list of its approved active 7(a) loan pool assemblers. The list also provides the primary point of contact for each active pool assembler to address any questions that may arise from the lenders or investors.

## Schedule of 1502 report and payment due dates

View the 1502 Report and Payment due dates for 7(a) Loans at the FTA wiki. The purpose of this notice is to inform SBA employees and lenders about the SBA Form 1502 report and payment due dates.

## Multi-party agreements

These template agreements are used for secured credit and SBA securitizations involving 7(a) loans. You must submit these documents with requests for the SBA’s approval for these types of financing.

## Fiscal Transfer Agent (FTA)

Guidehouse serves as FTA for SBA’s 7(a) loan program. As FTA, Guidehouse is the central registry for all guaranteed individual loan and SBA pool certificate interests. Guidehouse also serves as SBA paying agent for all investor payments, and processes lender loan reporting and payment remittance reconciliations.  Guidehouse can be reached at FTA@SBA.gov.

##  SBA lenders finance small businesses

          Become a lender
Order entered April 26, 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-16-00370-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B.T.G., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-12-12707-U



### ORDER Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart

In accordance with this Cour t’s opinion of this date, we REVERSE the trial court’s April

12, 2016 order sustaining the contest to appellant’s a ffidavit of indigence. Appellant is allowed

to proceed without prepayment of costs.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT
CHIEF JUSTICE
§ 549.14 Confidentiality of information. Any disclosure of test results or medical information is made in accordance with: ( a ) The Privacy Act of 1974, under which the Bureau publishes routine uses of such information in the Department of Justice Privacy Act System of Records Notice entitled “Inmate Physical and Mental Health Record System, JUSTICE/BOP-007”; and
( b ) The Correction Officers Health and Safety Act of 1998 (codified at 18 U.S.C. 4014), which provides that test results must be communicated to a person requesting the test, the person tested, and, if the results of the test indicate the presence of HIV, to correctional facility personnel consistent with Bureau policy.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001102008
<NAME>                        Amenity Zone, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Currency

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Oct-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Nov-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jan-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         585
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               585
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 585
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       550
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,050
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   585
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (3,015)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,015)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,015)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.005)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
### **CHAPTER 81—USER FEES UNDER FOREST SYSTEM RECREATION RESIDENCE PROGRAM**

Sec.
6201 to 6213. Repealed.
6214.
Cabin user and transfer fees.
### §402f. Further additions to park

For the purpose of preserving in their natural state the outstanding scenic features thereon and for the purpose of rounding out the boundary of the Bryce Canyon National Park, the President of the United States is authorized, upon the joint recommendation of the Secretaries of Interior and of Agriculture, to add to said park by Executive proclamation any or all of the following-described lands in the State of Utah, which shall thereupon become and be a part of said park subject to all laws and regulations applicable thereto, to wit: South half southwest quarter section 2, south half south half section 3, southeast quarter southeast quarter section 4, east half section 8, sections 9, 10, west half section 11, west half section 14, sections 15, 16, east half, northeast quarter northwest quarter, east half northwest quarter northwest quarter, north half southeast quarter northwest quarter, south half northeast quarter southwest quarter, north half south half southeast quarter northwest quarter and north half southeast quarter southwest quarter section 17, south half south half section 19, south half northwest quarter section 20, west half, west half east half and northeast quarter northeast quarter section 22, north half northwest quarter section 23, west half section 27, and north half northwest quarter section 34, township 36 south, range 3 west; lots 3 and 4, south half northwest quarter section 4, northeast quarter northeast quarter and southeast quarter southeast quarter section 8, township 37 south, range 3 west; west half east half and southwest quarter section 25, unsurveyed township 36 south, range 4 west; lots 3 and 4, south half west half section 3, lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 and south half section 4, and lots 1 and 2 and south half east half section 5, township 39 south, range 4 west, Salt Lake meridian: Provided, That nothing herein shall affect any valid existing claims upon the lands herein authorized to be added to the park or the rights of stockmen to continue to drive stock over the lands now under an existing stock driveway withdrawal.

(Feb. 17, 1931, ch. 209, §1, 46 Stat. 1166; Mar. 7, 1942, ch. 161, 56 Stat. 141.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1942—Act Mar. 7, 1942, corrected description of portions of the land.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 6, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-10513

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MAURICIO FLORES-SILLER, also known as Mauricio Flores, also

known as Carlos Mauricio Anaya-Flores,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas 

USDC No. 1:05-CR-82-ALL

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Mauricio FloresSiller raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate

criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance

is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
§ 16.50 Notice of compulsory legal process and emergency disclosures. ( a ) *Legal process disclosures.* Components shall make reasonable efforts to provide notice to an individual whose record is disclosed under compulsory legal process, such as an order by a court of competent jurisdiction, and such process becomes a matter of public record. Notice shall be given within a reasonable time after the component's receipt of process, except that in a case in which such process is not a matter of public record, the notice shall be given within a reasonable time only after such process becomes public. Where an individual, or the individual's legal counsel, has not otherwise received notice of the disclosure in the litigation process, notice shall be mailed to the individual's last known address and shall contain a copy of such process and a description of the information disclosed. Notice shall not be required if disclosure is made from a system of records that has been exempted from the notice requirement.
( b ) *Emergency disclosures.* Upon disclosing a record pertaining to an individual made under compelling circumstances affecting health or safety, the component shall notify that individual of the disclosure. This notice shall be mailed to the individual's last known address and shall state the nature of the information disclosed; the person, organization, or agency to which it was disclosed; the date of disclosure; and the compelling circumstances justifying the disclosure.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0000088

28-JUN-2013

08:40 AM
§ 28.2 Determination of offenses. ( a ) *Felony* means a Federal offense that would be classified as a felony under 18 U.S.C. 3559(a) or that is specifically classified by a letter grade as a felony.
( b ) The following offenses shall be treated for purposes of section 3 of Pub. L. 106-546 as qualifying Federal offenses: ( 1 ) Any felony.
( 2 ) Any offense under chapter 109A of title 18, United States Code, even if not a felony.
( 3 ) Any offense under any of the following sections of the United States Code, even if not a felony: ( i ) In title 18, section 111, 112(b) involving intimidation or threat, 113, 115, 245, 247, 248 unless the offense involves only a nonviolent physical obstruction and is not a felony, 351, 594, 1153 involving assault against an individual who has not attained the age of 16 years, 1361, 1368, the second paragraph of 1501, 1509, 1751, 1991, or 2194 involving force or threat.
( ii ) In title 16, section 773g if the offense involves a violation of section 773e(a)(3), 1859 if the offense involves a violation of section 1857(1)(E), 3637(c) if the offense involves a violation of section 3637(a)(3), or 5010(b) if the offense involves a violation of section 5009(6).
( iii ) In title 26, section 7212.
( iv ) In title 30, section 1463 if the offense involves a violation of section 1461(4).
( v ) In title 40, section 5109 if the offense involves a violation or attempted violation of section 5104(e)(2)(F).
( vi ) In title 42, section 2283, 3631, or 9152(d) if the offense involves a violation of section 9151(3).
( vii ) In title 43, section 1063 involving force, threat, or intimidation.
( viii ) In title 47, section 606(b).
( ix ) In title 49, section 46506(1) unless the offense involves only an act that would violate section 661 or 662 of title 18 and would not be a felony if committed in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States.
( 4 ) Any offense that is an attempt or conspiracy to commit any of the foregoing offenses, even if not a felony.
( c ) An offense that was or would have been a qualifying Federal offense as defined in this section at the time of conviction, such as an offense under 18 U.S.C. 2031 or 2032, remains a qualifying Federal offense even if the provision or provisions defining the offense or assigning its penalties have subsequently been repealed, superseded, or modified.
[Order No. 2753-2005, 70 FR 4767, Jan. 31, 2005]
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 12, 2019

NO. 03-18-00411-CV

Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas; and Ken Paxton, 

Attorney General of the State of Texas, Appellants

v.

1st Global, Inc., Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND SMITH

REVERSED AND RENDERED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on May 30, 2018. Having reviewed the 

record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in the court’s 

judgment. Therefore, the Court sustains the Comptroller’s issues on appeal. The Court reverses

the trial court’s denial of the Comptroller’s motion to dismiss and renders judgment dismissing 

1st Global’s attempted protest suit. Appellee shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in 

this Court and in the court below.
### §1211. Congressional statement of purpose

For the purpose of conserving and protecting coral reef resources of the tropical islands of interest and concern to the United States in the Pacific and safeguarding critical island areas from possible erosion and to safeguard future recreational and esthetic uses of Pacific coral reefs, the Secretary of Commerce and the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution are authorized to cooperate with and provide assistance to the governments of the State of Hawaii, the territories and possessions of the United States, including Guam and American Samoa, the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, and other island possessions of the United States, in the study and control of the seastar "Crown of Thorns" (Acanthaster planci).

(Pub. L. 91–427, §1, Sept. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 884; 1970 Reorg. Plan No. 4, eff. Oct. 3, 1970, 35 F.R. 15627, 84 Stat. 2090.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

"Secretary of Commerce" substituted in text for "Secretary of the Interior" in view of: creation of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in Department of Commerce and Office of Administrator of such Administration; abolition of Bureau of Commercial Fisheries in Department of the Interior and Office of Director of such Bureau; transfers of functions, including functions formerly vested by law in Secretary of the Interior or Department of the Interior which were administered through Bureau of Commercial Fisheries or were primarily related to such Bureau, exclusive of certain enumerated functions with respect to Great Lakes fishery research, Missouri River Reservoir research, Gulf Breeze Biological Laboratory, and Trans-Alaska pipeline investigations; and transfer of marine sport fish program of Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife by Reorg. Plan No. 4 of 1970, eff. Oct. 3, 1970, 35 F.R. 15627, 84 Stat. 2090, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Termination of Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands

For termination of Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, see note set out preceding section 1681 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.