alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §281. Purpose

It is the purpose of this subchapter to facilitate protection and provide interpretation of sites in the Nez Perce country of Idaho and in the States of Oregon, Washington, Montana, and Wyoming that have exceptional value in commemorating the history of the Nation.

(Pub. L. 89–19, §1, May 15, 1965, 79 Stat. 110; Pub. L. 102–576, §2(1), Oct. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 4770.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–576, which directed the insertion of "and in the States of Oregon, Washington, Montana, and Wyoming" after "the Nez Perce Country of Idaho", was executed by making the insertion after "the Nez Perce country of Idaho" to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title of 1992 Amendment

Pub. L. 102–576, §1, Oct. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 4770, provided that: "This Act [amending this section and sections 281a to 281c, 281e, and 281f of this title] may be cited as the 'Nez Perce National Historical Park Additions Act of 1991'."
#### Anita Bartless, as Administratrix of the Estate of Lucian Bartless, Deceased, Respondent, v. Pino-Lytol Chemical Co., Inc., Defendant, and Emilie N. Burrill et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No opinion. Carswell, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, J J., concur.
### §228j. Authorization of appropriations; availability of sums

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of sections 228a to 228j of this title, not to exceed, however, $1,250,000, in the aggregate for the period of the five fiscal years beginning with the fiscal year ending June 30, 1974, for the acquisition of lands and property, and not to exceed $49,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1974, $255,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1975, $265,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1976, and $235,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1977, for development, plus or minus such amounts, if any, as may be justified by reason of ordinary fluctuations in construction costs as indicated by engineering cost indexes applicable to the types of construction involved herein. The sums authorized in this section shall be available for acquisition and development undertaken subsequent to January 3, 1975.

(Pub. L. 93–620, §12, formerly §11, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2093; renumbered §12, Pub. L. 94–31, June 10, 1975, 89 Stat. 172.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

June 30, 1974, first appearing in text of section, was in the original "June 30, 1074". The typographical error was corrected to conform to the apparent intent of the Congress.
(No. 32304.

#### The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, *vs.*Wallace Thompson, Plaintiff in Error.

*Opinion filed September 17, 1952.*

Wallace Thompson, *pro se.*

Ivan A. Elliott, Attorney General, of Springfield, and John S. Boyle, State’s Attorney, of Chicago, (John T. Gallagher, Rudolph E. J anega, Arthur Manning, and William J. McGah, Jr., all of Chicago, of counsel,) for the People.

Mr. Justice Fulton

delivered the opinion of the court:

On December 14, 1942, the grand jury of the criminal court of Cook County returned two indictments against the plaintiff in error, one for assault with intent to commit robbery, etc., No. 42-2203, and one for armed robbery, No. 42-2204. In each case the Public Defender of Cook County was appointed to defend. In case No. 42-2204, plaintiff in error was tried by a jury and found guilty of *54robbery while armed and sentenced to the Illinois State Penitentiary for a term of years not less than one nor more than life. In case No. 42-2203, plaintiff in error waived a jury and was tried before the- court. He was found guilty of assault with intent to commit robbery and sentenced to the Illinois State Penitentiary for a term of years not less than one nor more than fourteen years. It was further ordered by the court that the sentence in cause No. 42-2203 runs concurrently with sentence in cause No. 42-2204.

Thompson appears *pro se*and prosecutes this writ of error seeking a review of the common-law record in both cases. No bill of exceptions has been filed.

No assignments of error appear in the abstract filed in either case. Several assignments of error appear in the brief of plaintiff in error, some of which have been presented by his argument, as follows :

His primary complaint is that it was error to have proceeded to trial without a court reporter being present to record the proceedings. It is apparent from the record that in cause No. 42-2204, a court reporter was present at sometime during the course of the trial and a partial transcript of the testimony prepared by him was filed with the clerk of this court on March 14, 1952. Plaintiff in error relies upon and cites in support of his contention the statute relating to the appointment of shorthand reporters. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1945, chap. 37, par. 163a.) There is no merit in his contention.

Affidavits attached to such transcript attempting to support an alibi, executed three years after the date of the crime, are of no force and effect in the absence of a bill of exceptions.

Others errors assigned, such as the insufficiency of evidence to convict and the admissibility of testimony, could only be considered and determined by a bill of exceptions. *People*v. *Johnson,*404 Ill. 33.

*55There is nothing in the record to show that plaintiff in error was not accorded a fair trial or that any of his constitutional rights were violated.

The judgment of the criminal court of Cook County

is affirmed.

*T , . m Judgment affirmed.*
#### GOVERNMENT OF GUAM, Appellee v. ROLANDO S. GARCIA, Appellant

Criminal No. 17-A

District Court of Guam Appellate Division

April 2, 1959

*48
      *Counsel for Appellee:*Richard D. Magee, *Deputy Island Attorney,*Attorney General’s Office

*Counsel for Appellant:*Reyes & Lamorena, *Attorneys at Law,*Agana, Guam

Before GILMARTIN, *United States Judge,*District Court of Guam; FURBER, *Chief Justice,*High Court of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands; MANIBUSAN, *Chief Judge,*Island Court of Guam

PER CURIAM

OPINION

This matter is before the Court, without oral argument, by stipulation of counsel. In answer to the first question submitted as to whether the Trial Court erred in denying the defendant’s motions to quash the information on the ground that no offense was charged because only acts at one time were charged as constituting vagrancy, while it is clear that at common law vagrancy was a continuing offense, it is also clearly within the power of the Legislature to enlarge the definition of vagrancy. The Guam Legislature has done this, and in Section 647 of the Penal Code has set forth the offense in terms far more comprehensive than the common law meaning of vagrancy.

At common law, and under most of the provisions of Section 647, a single act is not sufficient to constitute' a person a vagrant, but in each case the statute must be read in order to determine whether it requires more than a single act to be committed. Certain acts are of such a nature as to reasonably justify an inference that no one not of lewd or dissolute character would do the act even once. In a prosecution for vagrancy where the charge is based on Subdivision 5 of Section 647 of the Penal Code, as is applicable in this case, relating to lewd and dissolute persons, and the evidence shows such a single act, the question of the in*49ference to be drawn therefrom of a continuing act is for the Trial Court. *People v. Scott,*113 Cal.App. (Sup.) 778 (1931). *People v. Babb,*103 C.A.2d 326 (1951).

As to the second point raised by the appellant; namely, whether the Court erred in denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss, made on the ground that the testimony of the accomplice was not corroborated as required by Section 1111 of the Penal Code of Guam, we hold that the accused’s confession constituted sufficient corroboration. See 20 Am.Jur., Evidence, Sec. 1237, p. 1089.

The judgment of the Island Court of Guam is accordingly affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         115,084
<SECURITIES>                                    71,952
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,763
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,880
<INVENTORY>                                      1,349
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               251,024
<PP&E>                                         105,384
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,531
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 339,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           68,874
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            51
<OTHER-SE>                                     254,225
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   339,359
<SALES>                                        264,159
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               264,159
<CGS>                                           28,829
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,829
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,742
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,975
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,767
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,767
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12


</TABLE>
§ 115.232 Volunteer and contractor training. ( a ) The agency shall ensure that all volunteers and contractors who have contact with residents have been trained on their responsibilities under the agency's sexual abuse and sexual harassment prevention, detection, and response policies and procedures.
( b ) The level and type of training provided to volunteers and contractors shall be based on the services they provide and level of contact they have with residents, but all volunteers and contractors who have contact with residents shall be notified of the agency's zero-tolerance policy regarding sexual abuse and sexual harassment and informed how to report such incidents.
( c ) The agency shall maintain documentation confirming that volunteers and contractors understand the training they have received.
### §23. Detail of troops for protection of park

The Secretary of the Army, upon the request of the Secretary of the Interior, is authorized and directed to make the necessary details of troops to prevent trespassers or intruders from entering the park for the purpose of destroying the game or objects of curiosity therein, or for any other purpose prohibited by law, and to remove such persons from the park if found therein.

(Mar. 3, 1883, ch. 143, 22 Stat. 627; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, enacted "Title 10, Armed Forces" which in sections 3010 to 3013 continued military Department of the Army under administrative supervision of Secretary of the Army.
EXHIBIT 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

      THE STOCKHOLDERS AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE GILLETTE COMPANY

      We consent to incorporation by reference in the following registration
statements of The Gillette Company and any amendments thereto (1) No.
333-101112 on Form S-3, (2) No. 333-86334 on Form S-4, (3) No. 333-86336 on
Form S-3, (4) No. 333-59420 on Form S-8, (5) No. 333-63850 on Form S-8, (6) No.
333-55790 on Form S-8, (7) No. 333-75517 on Form S-3, (8) No. 33-9495 on Form
S-8, (9) No. 2-93230 on Form S-8, (10) Nos. 33-56218 and 33-27916 on Form S-8
which incorporate by reference therein registration statements on Form S-8 Nos.
2-90276, 2-63951 and 1-50710 and No. 2-41016 on Form S-7, (11) No. 33-54974 on
Form S-3, (12) No. 33-50303 on Form S-3, (13) No. 33-52465 on Form S-8, (14)
No. 33-53257 on Form S-8, (15) No. 33-53258 on Form S-8, (16) No. 33-55051 on
Form S-3, (17) No. 33-59125 on Form S-8, (18) No. 33-63707 on Form S-8, (19)
No. 333-16735 on Form S-4, (20) No. 333-19133 on Form S-8, (21), No. 333-25533
on Form S-8 and (22) No. 333-44257 on Form S-3 of our report dated February 14,
2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of The Gillette Company and
subsidiary companies as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the consolidated
statements of income, cash flows and stockholders' equity for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, which report is incorporated
by reference in the December 31, 2002, Annual Report on Form 10-K of The
Gillette Company.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 3, 2003

                                                                              20
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of National Companies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
L. Loehr, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date:    May 23, 2003                               /s/ Richard L. Loehr
                                                    ------------------------
                                                    Richard L. Loehr
                                                    Chairman and Chief
                                                    Executive Officer
# C_2010328EN.01003002.xml

| 4.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/30

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 15 October 2010 — Nexans France v Joint Undertaking Fusion for Energy

(Case T-415/10 R)

(Application for interim measures - Tendering procedure - Rejection of a tender - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)

2010/C 328/51

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Nexans France SAS (Clichy, France) (represented by: J.-P. Tran Thiet and J.-F. Le Corre, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (represented by: A. Verpoint, Agent and C. Kennedy-Loest, C. Thomas, M. Farley, Solicitors, J. Derenne and N. Pourbaix, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of decisions taken by the defendant, in a tendering procedure, to reject the applicant’s bid and to award the contract for supply of TF and PF conductors to another tenderer.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40958

Summary Calendar

__________________

LARRY D. BONEY,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JAMES A. COLLINS, Executive 

Director; WAYNE SCOTT, Director; 

M.D. Hall, Warden,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-95-CV-276

- - - - - - - - - -

June 24, 1996

Before POLITZ, KING and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM*

Larry D. Boney appeals the dismissal of his civil rights

suit pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Boney fails to raise

a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. Because the appeal is frivolous,

the appeal is DISMISSED.

This court previously cautioned Boney to review any pending

appeals in order to avoid the imposition of sanctions. See,

e.g., Boney v. Collins, No. 95-40742 (Dec. 18, 1995). Boney
No. 95-40958

-2-

continues to ignore our admonishment. Accordingly, Boney is

BARRED from filing any pro se, in forma pauperis, civil appeal in

this court, or any pro se, in forma pauperis, initial civil

pleading in any court which is subject to this court’s

jurisdiction, without the advance written permission of a judge

of the forum court; the clerk of this court and the clerks of all

federal district courts in this Circuit are directed to return to

Boney, unfiled, any attempted submission inconsistent with this

bar.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS IMPOSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
### SUBCHAPTER XXXVIII—ZION NATIONAL PARK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Administrative Proceedings Rulings

Release No. 6906 / May 23, 2023

Administrative Proceeding

File No. 3-17228

In the Matter of

David S. Hall, P.C. d/b/a The Hall 

Group CPAs,

David S. Hall, CPA,

Michelle L. Helterbran Cochran, 

CPA, and

Susan A. Cisneros

Order on Motion to Continue

The Division of Enforcement filed a motion to continue the postponement 

of all deadlines in this proceeding pending the later of: (1) the resolution of this 

case in district court given the Supreme Court’s decision remanding the matter

for further proceedings, Axon Enter., Inc. v. FTC, 143 S. Ct. 890 (2023); or (2)

the resolution of the petition for certiorari filed in Jarkesy v. SEC, 34 F.4th 446

(5th Cir. 2022), reh’g en banc denied, 51 F.4th 644 (2022), petition for cert. filed, 

No. 22-859 (U.S. Mar. 8, 2023), which raised constitutional issues that would 

have an impact on the instant proceeding. The Division reported that 

Respondent Michelle L. Helterbran Cochran agreed to a postponement 

pending the resolution of Cochran, but at this time, did not agree to a 

postponement pending the resolution of Jarkesy.

All deadlines will remain postponed until the resolution of the district 

court action in Cochran. See 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.161(a)–(b). The Supreme Court 

has given the green light for Respondent to pursue her constitutional 

challenges to this administrative proceeding in district court, and the case 

cannot move forward until those challenges are resolved. Given this posture, 

it is premature to postpone deadlines based on Jarkesy.

/s/ Jason S. Patil

Administrative Law Judge
Searched for **http://www.pcah.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.pcah.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
တၢ်သမံသမိးတၢ်ဒီးမ့ၢ်ထံၣ်လၢ နအိၣ်ဒီး COVID-19 အဃိ

မၤတၢ်ပတီၢ်တဖၣ်လၢ ကမၤစၢၤတၢ်လၢ ကဒီသဒၢCOVID-19 အတၢ်ရၤလီၤသး

အိၣ်လၢဟံၣ်. 

မ့တမ့ၢ်လၢ နလဲၤမၤန့ၢ်တၢ်အိၣ်ဆူၣ်အိၣ်ချ ့

တၢ်ကွၢ်ထွ ဲဘၣ်အဃိ, တဘၣ်ဟးထီၣ်လၢ နဟံၣ်တဂ့ၤ. 

တဘၣ်လဲၤဆူကမျၢၢ်အိၣ်တၢ်အလီၢ်ကဝီၤတဖၣ်တဂ့ၤ.

အိၣ်ဘှ ံးအိၣ်သါဒီးအီထံနိလၢလၢလီၢ်လီၢ်တက့ၢ်. 

အီကသံၣ်လၢ တၢ်ပှ ့ၤအီၤဖဲကသံၣ်ကျးသ့, 

ဒ်အမ့ၢ်အစဲးတမံၣ်နိၣ်ဖဲ (acetaminophen), 

လၢကမၤကိညၢ်ထီၣ်နၤန့ၣ်တက့ၢ်.

တၢ်သမံသမိးတၢ်ဒီးမ့ၢ်ထံၣ်လၢ နတအိၣ်ဒီး

COVID-19 အဃိ

•	 ဖဲတၢ်ဟံးန့ၢ်နတၢ်အဒိတဖၣ်အခါ ဘၣ်သ့ၣ်သ့ၣ်နတဘၣ်ဂာ်ဒီး တၢ်ဆါဒံးဘၣ်န့ၣ်လီၤ. 

•	 ဒ်လဲၣ်ဂ့ၤ, တၢ်အံၤအခီပညီတမ့ၢ်လၢ နကဆူးက့ဆါဘီဘၣ်န့ၣ်လီၤ. 

•	 ဘၣ်သ့ၣ်သ့ၣ်ကမ့ၢ်လၢ ဖဲတၢ်ဟံးန့ၢ်နတၢ်ထံတၢ်နိအဒိတဖၣ်အခါ ဘၣ်သ့ၣ်သ့ၣ်နဘၣ်ဂာ်သီသီအဃိ

တၢ်ကမၤကွၢ်ဒီးထံၣ်လၢ နအိၣ်ဒီးတၢ်ဆါလၢခံန့ၣ်လီၤ. 

317369-A | June 3, 2020 12:18 PM

နတၢ်သမံသမိးအစၢအခီပညီ

တၢ်နုာ်လီၤကွၢ်အီၤသ့ဖဲ https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/testing/diagnostic-testing.html 

ဆဲးကျၢဒီးနကသံၣ်သရၣ်ထီဘိတက့ၢ်.

ဆဲးကျၢဒီးနကသံၣ်သရၣ်ထီဘိတက့ၢ်. 

ပာ်လီၤဆီနသးဒီး ပှၤအဂၤတဖၣ်တက့ၢ်.

တသ့ဖဲအသ့, အိၣ်လၢဒၢးလီၤဆီအပူၤဒီး အိၣ်ယံၤဒီးပှၤကညီ

မ့တမ့ၢ်ဆၣ်ဖိကီၢ်ဖိလၢတၢ်ဘုၣ်အီၤလၢ ဟံၣ်တဖၣ်န့ၣ်တက့ၢ်.

တၢ်မၤကွၢ်အစၢမ့ၢ်ထံၣ်လၢ

နတအိၣ်ဒီးတၢ်ဆါဘၣ်

အဃိအခီပညီတမ့ၢ်လၢ

နတဆူးက့ထီၣ်လၢခံ

ဘၣ်န့ၣ်လီၤ.

CDC.GOV/CORONAVIRUS
CS 314937-AI 05/11/2020

cdc.gov/coronavirus

Men ko kwōn jeļā kōn COVID-19 

n̄an kōjparoke eok make im ro jet

Jeļā kōn COVID-19

• Coronavirus (COVID-19) ej juon kain 

nan̄inmej me juon kij virus ej kōṃṃane im 

ejeļā ajeeded jān armej n̄an armej.

• Kij virus eo me ej kōṃṃane COVID-19 ej 

juon coronavirus me ekāāl wōt ilo aolepan 

laļ in.

• Kakōļļe ko an COVID-19 remaron̄ jān 

mera (ak ejjeļọk kakōļļe ko) n̄an nan̄inmej 

ekauwōtata.

Kwōn jeļā wāween an 

COVID-19 ajeeded

• Kwō maron̄ tōran̄ ilo aṃ keepaak im 

ekkeitaak (ellōkan 6 ne ak aitokin ruo pā) 

ippān juon armej im elōn̄ an COVID-19. 

Eļaptata an COVID-19 ajeeded jān armejn̄an-armej.

• Kwō maron̄ tōran̄ jān pil jidikdik in menono 

ko n̄e juon armej me eṃōj an tōran̄ ej 

pokpok, ṃaje ak kōnono.

• Kwō bar maron̄ in ebbōk jān aṃ jibwe ioon 

juon men eo im kij virus eo ej pād ioon, 

innām jibwe lọn̄iōṃ, bọtiṃ, ak mejeṃ.

Kōjparoke eok make im ro jet 

jān COVID-19

• Ejan̄in wōr juon wā vaccine n̄an kōjparok 

ņae COVID-19. Wāween eo eṃṃantata 

n̄an kōjparoke eok make ej ilo aṃ bōbrae 

aṃ kepaake kij virus eo me ej kōṃṃane 

COVID-19.

• Pād wōt ṃweo iṃōṃ n̄an jon̄an aṃ maron̄

im bōbrae am keepaak ro jet.

• Kōņake juon kein kalbubuuk iturin mejeṃ 

nuknuk me ej kalbubuuk bọtiṃ im lọn̄iōṃ 

ijoko lọbwilej.

• En ikut aṃ karreoik im ṃanṃan kij ioon 

men ko me ikut an armej jibwe.

• En ikut aṃ aṃwin peōṃ kōn joob im 

dān iuṃwin ejjab dikļọk jān 20 jekōn, ak 

kōjerbal juon kein ṃanṃan kij ilo pā (hand 

sanitizer) me ej iiōk jān ejjab dikļọk jān 

60% arkooļ.

milk

Kōjerbal kakkobaba 

kōttoļọk

• Wia ṃōn̄ā im wūno, itān 

loļọk taktō eo im kadedeļọk 

eṃṃakūtkūt ko ikijjien pāān̄

online n̄e kwō maron̄.

• N̄e kwōj aikuj in etal kōn 

ānbwin, kwōn pād wōt ejjab 

dikļọk jān 6 ne jān ro jet im 

ṃanṃan kij (disinfect) ioon 

men ko me kwō aikuj in jibwe.

• Ebbōk men ko bōkļọk 

(delivery) im takeout, im 

kabbōjrak im ekkeitaak 

armej n̄an jon̄an aṃ maron̄. 

Bōbrae an COVID-19 

ajeeded n̄e kwō 

nan̄inmej

• Pād wōt ṃweo iṃōṃ n̄e 

kwō nan̄inmej, ijellọkun n̄an 

kappukot kōjparok-wūno.

• Bōbrae iaļ ko lọbwilej, ajejiaļ, ak tāākji ko.

• Kōjepel eok make jān armej 

ro jet im menin mour nājnāj 

ilo ṃweo iṃōṃ. 

• Ejjeļọk juon wāween 

kōṃadṃōde COVID-19 ejejjet, 

ak kwō maron̄ kappukot 

kōjparok-wūno n̄an jipan̄ n̄an 

kadikļọk kakōļļe ko aṃ.

• N̄e kwōj aikuj itān taktō, 

kūrļọk mokta.

Kile aṃ uwōta kōn 

nan̄inmej ekauwōtata

• Elōn̄ an aolep armej uwōta 

in ebbōk COVID-19.

• Liļļap im lōļļap ro im armej 

ro jekdọọn dettaer me elōn̄

aer apan̄ kōn ājmuur/wūno 

ṃwilaļ remaron̄ pād iuṃwin 

uwōta eļapļọk n̄an ebbōk 

nan̄inmej ekauwōtata.