____ 3.J

__________ LUL1 ZjJ

Our Ref No 97-75

RESPONSE OF THE OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL Federated Investors Inc

DWISION OF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT File No 811-699

Your letter of July 1997 requests our assurance that we would not recommend

enforcement action to the Commission if an issuer that does not register under the Investment

Company Act of 1940 Investment Company Act in reliance on the exception from the

defmition of investment company provided by Rule 3a-7 under that Act purchases and holds in

its pre-funded account shares of money market funds in the manner described in your letter

Facts

You state that pre-funded account is an account established by an issuer of assetbacked securities that holds highly rated liquid short-term investments under the control of an

indenture trustee pending the purchase by the issuer of additional receivables the cash flow of

which would fund the asset-backed securities the pre-funding period You state that pre

funded accounts which are prevalent in transactions in which the issuer secuiitizes receivables

that are created on regular and predictable basis such as automobile loans and credit card

receivables allow sponsors to lock in fmancing and take advantage of market opportunities

without waiting for all of the underlying receivables to be created

You explain that in pre-funded transaction the issuer raises more cash from the sale

of asset-backed securities than is needed to pay for the receivables that it purchases from the

sponsor on the date that the securities are issued the closing date You state that the excess

cash is deposited in pre-funded account and that the ratio of the amount deposited compared

with the total offering proceeds varies depending on the size of the offering the amount of

receivables available to be purchased by the issuer on the closing date interest rate expectations

and market demand for the securities You state that the assets in the pre-funded account are

used to purchase additional receivables that are substantially similar to those receivables

purchased by the issuer on the closing date2 and that the sponsor determines the frequency of

You state that as general matter these investments are not actively managed

2You state that when rating an asset-backed transaction with pre-funded component the

rating agency considers the nature of the receivables being securitized the sponsors ability to

generate the receivables on timely basis the sponsor and the criteria of the underlying

documents regarding the additional receivables to be purchased by the issuer during the pre

funding period In addition the rating agency along with the underwriter and credit support

provider if any examines the reeeivables acquired during the pre-funding period to ensure that

the characteristics of these receivables are substantially similar to the characteristics of the

receivables transferred on the closing date
these purchases.3 Any assets remaining in the pre-funded account at the end of the pre-funding

period will be paid to security holders as principal prepayments You represent that pre-funded

accounts generally are tenninated no later than six months after the asset-backed securities aie

issued although issuers that are structured as grantor trusts must terminate these accounts no

later than 90 days after issuance in order to preserve their status as trust for tax puiposes

You state that an indenture trustee selects appropriate investments for the pre-funded

account from list previously approved by the rating agency rating the transaction that is set

forth in the issuers governing documents.4 You further state that assets in pre-funded accounts

typically are invested in money market instruments such as commercial paper You maintain

that permitting pre-funded accounts to .invest in shares of money market funds would enhance

investor protection by enabling the account to hold more diversified pool of assets and

assets that are highly liquid and under continuous professional management

Analysis

Rule 3a-7 excepts from the defmition of investment company any issuer who is engaged

in the business of purchasing or otherwise acquiring and holding eligible assets and who does

not issue redeemable securities and in activities related or incidental thereto provided that

certain conditions are met Paragraph bl of the rule defmes eligible assets as fmancial

assets either fixed or revolving that by their terms convert into cash within fmite time period

plus any rights or other assets designed to assure the servicing or timely distribution of proceeds

to security holders Money market fund shares held in pre-funded account are not eligible

assets because money market fund shares are common stock and thus do not convert into

cash within fmite time period and such shares are held in pre-funded account pending

the purchase of additional receivables and are not designed to assure the servicing or timely

distribution of cash flow from the receivables to security holders

3You state that if interest rates decrease after the closing date resulting in the origination

of receivables with an interest rate lower than those receivables already purchased by the issuer

the sponsor would sell these receivables to the issuer at discount and more receivables would

be purchased by the issuer in order to support the interest rate on the asset-backed securities

However if interest rates drop so dramatically that the sponsor is unable to provide sufficient

receivables at the requisite interest rates you state that security holders would be repaid their

principal from the assets held in the pre-funded account

4You state that the investments are selected in manner designed to ensure that the

investment return is both secure and sufficient to help fund the asset-backed securities interest

rate until additional receivables are purchased You also state that typically in pre-funded

account the sponsor will self-fund capitalized interest account that would be used to help

support the securities interest rate because the returns of the permitted investments by

themselves are usually insufficient
Any issuer relying on Rule 3a-7 must be engaged solely in the business of purchasing

or otherwise acquiring and holding eligibleassets and in activities related or incidental thereto.5

The related or incidental activities permitted by Rule 3a-7 include only those activities that

support or further and therefore are secondary to the entitys business of purchasing or

otherwise acquiring and holding eligible assets.6

You maintain that holding money market fund shares in pre-funded account may be

viewed as secondary activity that supports the issuers business of acquiring eligible assets

i.e the receivables and thus such an activity meets the standard of related or incidental

thereto for purposes of Rule 3a-7 You contend that any issuer that purchases and holds in its

pre-funded account shares of money market funds may rely on Rule 3a-7 if the issuer obtains

an opinion of counsel concluding that it may rely on Rule 3a-7 because the issuer is engaged

solely in the business of acquiring and holding eligible assets

Based on all the facts and representations contained in your letter we agree that under

certain circumstances holding assets in pre-funded account could be viewed as related or

incidental activity for purposes of Rule 3a-7 provided that such an activity will support or

further and therefore be secondary to the issuers business of acquiring and holding eligible

assets In reaching this determination factors to be considered include the length of the pre

funding period the maturity date of the asset-backed securities issued and the cash amount

deposited in the pre-funded account compared with the total offering proceeds This analysis

would be the same regardless of whether the pre-funded account held money market fund shares

or any other instrument that is not an eligible asset.7 Because of the factual nature of this

determination the staff will not express an opinion with respect to whether particular issuer

that holds assets that are not eligible assets in pre-funded account is engaged in related or

incidental activity for purposes of Rule 3a-7

Rochelle Kauffman Plesset

Senior Counsel

5See Investment Company Act Release No 19105 Nov 19 1992 adopting Rule 3a-7

Investment Company Act Release No 18736 May 29 1992 proposing Rule 3a-7

6Citicorp Securities Inc pub avail Aug 1995 no-action relief granted to an issuer

that obtained an opinion of counsel that concluded that the issuer may rely on Rule 3a-7 because

the issuer will be engaged solely in the business of acquiring and holding eligible assets and

the issuers holding of assets that are not eligible assets is an activity related or incidental

to that business

7Detennining whether assets held in pre-funded account would constitute related or

incidental activity is necessary only when the assets are not eligible assets Issuers with pre

funded accounts that hold only eligible assets meet the literal terms of Rule 3a-7
CARTER LEDYARD Sc MILBURN

COUNSEL.LORS AT LAW

WALL STREET

NEW YORK V.10005-2072

JAMES ABBOTT

JOHN ARMSTRONG

HOWARD BARHETJR

LAWRENCE CARNEVALE

CLIFFORD CASE ill

JEROME CAULFIELD

BERNARD CEDARBAUM

JEROME J.COHEN

RICHARD COVEY

THOMAS DAVISJR

TIMOTHY FITZGIBBON

MICHAEL FRANKEL

JAMES GADSDEN

PETER MCN.GATES

STEVEN GLUSBAND

ROBERT R.GREW

ROBERT L.HOEGLE

MAcCULLOCH IRVING

JACK KAPLAN

BERNARD KAROL

STEPHEN L.KASS

STEPHEN LAPPERT

ROBERT McTAMANEY

VINCENT MONTE-SANO

KATHLEEN MORIARTY

JAMES RAYH ILL

ROBERT RIGGS

JOSEPH RYAN

HEYWOOD SHELLEY

WILLIAM SLOANE

WILLIAM SONDERICKER

JOHN SPARKMAN

ANTOINETTE THOMAS

THEODORE R.WAGNER

JOHN WHELAN

DONALD J.ZOELLER

212 732-3200

FAX 212 732-3232

1940 Act

Section 3a

Rule 3a-7

1350 STREET N.W

WASHINGTON 20005

114 WEST 47Th STREET HEW YORKN.Y 10036

DEVEREUX MILBURN

GENERAL COUNSEL

WILLIAM CAMERON

WILLIAM DONOVAN

ROBERT ERSIcINEJR

JEAN MCCARROLL

GEORGE MINKIN

STANLEY REED JR

COUNSEL

WRITERS DIRECT DIAL

212 238-8624

Division of Investment Management

Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street N.W

Washington DC 20549

Attention Office of Chief Counsel

July 1997

Ladies and Gentlemen

Federated Investors Inc

1940 Act Section 3a Rule 3a-7

On behalf of Federated Investors Inc we are writing in regard to issuers of asset-backed

securities which do not register under the Investment Company Act of 1940 the 1940 Act in

reliance on Rule 3a-7 thereunder We hereby request that the Staff of the Division of Investment

Management the Staff confirm that under Rule 3a-7 such issuers may purchase and hold for

their pre-funded accounts shares of registered investment companies which qualify as money

market funds MMFs under Rule 2a-7 under the circumstances described more fully below

PRE-FUNDED ACCOUNTS

The Commission adopted Rule 3a-7 in 1992 to exclude structured flnancings meeting the

rules conditions from the definition ofinvestment company under Section 3a of the 1940 Act

See Release No IC-19105 52 SEC Docket 2573 November 191992 the Issuing Release

5888 16-8
Securities and Exchange Commission

The adoption of the rule implemented the recommendation made in Chapter The Treatment

of Structured Finance Under the Investment Company Act of the Division of Investment

Managements 1992 report Protecting Investors Half Century of Investment Company

Regulation the Report

An important new development in the structured finance market is pre-funding In

pre-funded transaction the issuer raises more cash in the offering than is needed to purchase the

receivables it intends to purchase immediately The remaining cash is placed in pre-funded

account under the control of the indenture trustee and is invested in highly rated liquid short

term investments pending the subsequent purchase by the issuer of other receivables during

limited pre-funding period The additional assets must be of the same character as the initial

assets and meet specific eligibility requirements

Pre-funding is especially prevalent in the case of issuers which hold assets which are

created on regular and predictable basis such as automobile loans and credit card receivables

The following is more comprehensive discussion of pre-funding

The Mechanics of the Pre-funded Account

The sponsor and/or depositor sponsor or one of its affiliates determines the total dollar

amount of certificates which are to be issued by the issuer and the amount of receivables to be

transferred to the issuer based on several variable factors Such factors include the

availability on the date the securities are issued the Closing Date of receivables satisfring

the characteristics required by the rating agencies the underwriters and the insurers or other

credit support providers interest rate expectations and market demand

On the Closing Date the sponsor transfers the receivables to the issuer in exchange forthe

securities The securities are then sold to an underwriter for cash or to the securityholders

directly if the securities are sold through placement agent The cash received by the sponsor

from the securityholders or the underwriter from the sale of the securities issued by the issuer

in excess of the purchase price forthe receivables constitutes the cash to be deposited in the pre

funded account Such funds are accounted for separately and are not part of the assets of the

sponsor

Generally the receivables are transferred at par value unless the interest rate payable by

the receivables is not sufficient to service both the interest rates to be paid on the securities and

the transaction fees servicing fees trustee fees and fees to credit support providers In such

cases the receivables are sold to the issuer at discount based on fonnula agreed upon in

advance by the parties For example if the securities issued by the issuer bear interest at ten

percent 10% and assuming no transaction fees $100 receivable that is paying eight percent

8%would be sold to the issuer at $80 in order to achieve the required 10% pass-through rate

Alternatively if there are large number of such lower interest-paying receivables the

588816-8
Securities and Exchange Commission

receivables could be sold to the issuer each at par $100 and the securityholders would receive

payments from one security representing $80 of principal paying 10% interest and the extra $20

of principal would be offered by the issuer as principal only strip security The rating

agencies do not generally require any particular formula for establishing the purchase price of

the receivables provided that the parties can demonstrate that the purchase price of the

receivables can support the pass-through rate to be paid to the securityholders The proceeds

payable to the sponsor from the sale of the receivables transferred to the issuer may also be

reduced to the extent they are used to pay transaction costs which typically include underwriting

or placement agent fees and legal and accounting fees In addition the sponsor may in certain

cases be required by the rating agencies to set up trust reserve accounts to protect the

securityholders against credit losses

The pre-funded account is invested in certain permitted investments as defined in the

governing documents The time period during which an issuer might invest pre-funded accounts

in MMFs is usually restricted by economic and tax factors and by the underlying documents

As practical matter the rating agencies require that the pre-funding period end after no more

than six months and the underlying documents usually require that the pre-funded account end

after six months

It is our understanding that most structured flnancings other than credit card receivable

transactions which meet the terms of Rule 3a-7 have qualified as grantor trusts for purposes of

federal taxation Grantor trusts are trusts organized under state law which qualify for passthrough taxation pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 671 Under Internal Revenue

Service regulations set forth at 26 C.F.R 301.7701-4c and rulings issued thereunder trust

generally cannot make new investments after 90 days have elapsed since the inception of the trust

without losing its status as trust for tax purposes and the accompanying exemption from tax at

the entity level Such an event would be catastrophic for an asset-backed trust Therefore the

documentation for grantor trust with pre-funded account provides that the balance of the

account must be either securitized or returned to the security holders on pro rata basis within

this 90-day period Accordingly the pre-funded account of grantor trust exists for maximum

period of 90 days

Structured financings backed by credit card receivables generally are also organized as

trusts under state law but are not trusts for tax purposes Due to the revolving rather than

term nature of credit debt individual credit card holders are constantly repaying and

reborrowing Since purchasers of asset-backed securities require reasonably predictable

amortization schedule the issuer must be able to acquire additional receivables which meet

defined criteria to minimize pre-payments of the asset-backed securities This limited power to

vary prevents grantor trust status Such issuers generally qualify for pass-through taxation as

partnerships under subchapter of the Internal Revenue Code For general discussion of these

issues see Peaslee Investment Trusts in the Age of Financial Derivatives Tax Law Review

5888 16-8
Securities and Exchange Commission

During the pre-funding period the sponsor determines how frequently the receivables aie

to be sold to the issuer for cash Usually the transfers are made on periodic basis as sufficient

numbers of receivables become available to make it administratively convenient to transfer them

Any amounts paid out of the pre-funded account are used solely to purchase receivables and to

support the pass-through rate as explained above However in the event that after all of the

requisite receivables have been transferred to the issuer any funds remain in the pre-funded

account such funds will be paid to the certificateholders as principal prepayments

Percentage of Pre-Funding

The percentage or ratio of the amount allocated to the pre-funded account as compared

to the total offering proceeds of issuers has usually varied from 10% to 40% with 25% typically

used The pre-funding percentage is function of both the size of the offering desired and the

assets which are available at the time of the offering In addition predictions as to the rise or fall

of interest rates can affect the decision as to what ratio of pre-funding is to be utilized An

expectation of higher interest rates encourages the use of pre-funding because the parties will

want to issue as many certificates as possible at the current rate rather than issue higher rate

certificates in the future Also high market demand encourages pre-funding in order to

effectuate the transactions There is no optimal percentage However the advantages for the

sponsor of pre-funding must be weighed against the cost to such sponsor of funding capitalized

interest account to subsidize the interest rate on the expected gap between the pass-through rate

on the securities and the return on the receivables transferred to the issuer on the Closing Date

This is cost factor for the sponsor because the permitted investments for funds in the pre-funded

account and capitalized interest account produce lower rate of return than interest accruing on

the securities

Spring 1994 419

In recognition of the practical difficulties posed by the grantor trust and partnership

formats Congress established new type of tax pass-through vehicle Financial Asset

Securitization Investment Trust or FASIT in the Small Business Job Protection Act passed on

August 1996 Ifan issuer satisfies the structural and operational tests provided by new Internal

Revenue Code section 860L then the issuer is not subject to income taxation and items of

income deduction loss and tax credit flow through to the investors pursuant to new Internal

Revenue Code section 860H One of the operational tests in the definition of FASIT is that the

issuer must invest substantially all of its assets in permitted assets as of the close of the third

month after the day of its formation and at all times thereafter One of the types of asset included

in the definition of permitted assets is cash equivalents which includes MMFs Internal

Revenue Code Section 860Lc1A Therefore in contrast to grantor trusts there are no tax

considerations which limit the time FASITs can maintain pre-funded accounts ifthe account is

invested in cash equivalents

5888 16-8
Securities and Exchange Commission

Changes in Interest Rates During Pre-Funding Period

dramatic change in interest rates which adversely affected the rates of return on the

receivables held by an issuer using pre-funded account with ninety-day pre-funded period

would be handled as follows If the receivables had already been originated prior to the closing

date no action would be required as the fluctuations in market interest rates would not affect the

receivables transferred to the issuer after the closing date In contrast ifinterest rates fall after

the closing date receivables originated after the closing date will tend to be originated at lower

rates with the possible result that the receivables will not support the pass-through rate In such

situations the sponsor would sell the receivables to the issuer at discount as described in Item

above and more receivables will be used to fund the issuer in order to support the passthrough rate In situation where interest rates drop dramatically and the sponsor is unable to

provide sufficient receivables at the requisite interest rates the pool would be closed In this

latter event under the terms of the pooling and servicing agreement the securityholders would

get repayment of principal from the unused cash held in the pre-funded account In transactions

where the pass-through rates are variable or adjustable the effects of market interest rate

fluctuations are mitigated In no event will fluctuations in interest rates payable on the

receivables affect the pass-through rate paid to securityholders

As described in Item below the rating agency the underwriter and any insurer or other

credit support provider each have requirements with respect to the characteristics of the

receivables to be transferred after the closing date In addition such parties may require the

establishment of yield supplement arrangements and capitalized interest accounts Both of these

control mechanisms directly or indirectly mitigate the effect of receivable interest rate

fluctuations However it is the sponsor who is directly obligated under the pooling and servicing

agreement to take whatever actions are necessaiy to maintain the pass-through rate in the event

of interest rate fluctuations The sponsor has the responsibility to transfer the appropriate

receivables to the issuer to support the pass-through rate The rating agencies underwriters

insurers or other credit support providers servicers or trustees are not concerned about how this

is accomplished as long as the end result is that the receivables held by the issuer are able to

support such pass-through rate

Maintenance of the Pre-funded and Capitalized Interest Accounts

The pre-funded and capitalized interest accounts and all other cash accounts maintained

by the issuer are either kept in separate sub-accounts or are invested on commingled basis

Where the accounts are invested on commingled basis precise accounting records are kept by

an independent substantial institutional trustee in order to assure that at all times the assets

which belong to each account can be identified and that the investment income is properly

credited The pooling and servicing agreement sets forth each account to be established states

in very specific terms what cash is to go into each account when moneys are to be paid out and

when and in what circumstances moneys can be transferred from or to an account The pooling

5888 16-8
Securities and Exchange Commission

and servicing agreement also specifies the permitted investments for the cash held in these

accounts

The sponsor must fund the capitalized interest account Funds are paid out periodically

to the securityholders as needed on distribution dates to support the pass-through rate In

addition portion of such funds may be returned to the sponsor from time to time as the

receivables are transferred to the issuer and the need for the capitalized interest account

diminishes As the sponsor has the economic burden of maintaining this account it will

sometimes negotiate with the rating agencies to allow return of funds to the sponsor as the

receivables are purchased and the funds are no longer needed In other cases the rating agencies

may insist on maintenance of the capitalized interest account until the end of the pre-funding

period

Characteristics of Receivables Transferred after the Closing Date.

We understand that investors place particularly strong reliance on the rating agency

review because of the complexities of structured finance offerings In rating an offering with

pre-funded component the rating agencies consider the nature of the receivables the sponsors

ability to generate the receivables on timely basis the sponsor and the criteria of the underlying

documents regarding additional assets

The characteristics of the receivables transferred to the issuer after the Closing Date are

substantially similar to the characteristics of those transferred on the closing date and have such

characteristics as are necessary to satisfy the requirements of the rating agency the underwriter

and the insurer or other credit support provider All of these parties examine the receivables

acquired during the pre-funding period to ascertain iftheir characteristics are in fact substantially

similar to those acquired on the closing date based on their own criteria which may be different

from each other The factors which may be considered include the following the range of

interest rates payable on the receivables and the weighted average interest rate of such

receivables the range of the remaining term to maturity of the receivables and the weighted

average of such terms seasoning factor indicating how long the receivable has been

outstanding which indicates the payment history of the debtor the loan-to-value ratios of the

receivables compared to the loan collateral debt service coverage ratio indicating the size of

the receivable as percentage of the borrowers monthly expenses the geographic dispersement

and concentration of the receivables the average balance outstanding the type of collateral and

the maximum and minimum rates of variable rate receivables Not all of the above factors are

necessarily relevant to every asset type

The emphasis on specific factors varies from transaction to transaction and may vary

significantly for different types of receivable pools For example in automobile transactions the

loan-to-value ratios are not considered to be that significant but for mortgage transactions the

loan-to-value ratios generally are considered quite important

5888 16-8
Securities and Exchange Commission

Compliance with the requirements established by the rating agencies insurers or other

credit support providers and underwriters are monitored by such parties and the sponsors

accountants For example the rating agencies typically review tape setting forth the specific

characteristics of the receivables to be transferred for compliance with the required criteria and

actual loan files may be spot-checked against the tape especially for new sponsors who do not

have an established performance record Non-conforming receivables are rejected

Insurer and Credit Support Providers Right to Veto Receivables

In certain transactions the insurer and/or other credit support provider may have the right

to veto specific receivables This right usually takes the form of requirement that the sponsor

obtain the consent of these parties before the receivables can be transferred to the issuer The

insurer and/or credit support provider may therefore reject certain receivables or require that the

sponsor establish certain reserve accounts as condition of including the receivables Virtually

all issuers which have insurers or other credit support providers are structured to give such veto

rights to these parties The percentage of issuers that have insurers and/or credit support

providers and accordingly feature such veto rights varies but we believe that majority of

transactions have some kind of credit support

Permitted Investments in the Pre-funded and Capitalized Interest Accounts

The permitted types of investments in the pre-funded account and capitalized interest

account are highly rated conservative investments as set forth in the pooling and servicing

agreement and as required by the rating agencies The investments are selected in manner

designed to insure that the return is both secure and sufficient when combined with the amount

contributed to the capitalized interest account to fund the pass-through rate In the unlikely

event that any of these conservative investments failed to pay interest and principal at maturity

the loss would be distributed pro-rata to the securityholders in the same manner as ifone of the

issuers permanent investments failed

Investment decisions for the pre-funded account are usually made by the indenture

trustee We understand from speaking to industry participants that indenture trustees do not

normally actively manage the investments of the pre-funded account Indenture trustees tend to

invest the pre-funded account at the closing of the offering for the duration of the pre-funded

period according to the anticipated dates for future transfers of receivables paid for out of the pre

funded account Any amounts in the pre-funded account which are not used to purchase

additional assets must be returned to the securityholders at the end of the pre-funding period

While the issuer is often over-collateralized in some manner to provide for some default on the

assets it owns the pre-funded account is not subject to separate over-collateralization

requirement

588816-8
Securities and Exchange Commission

Benefits of Pre-Funding

Pre-funding has benefits to both sponsors and investors in that it reduces the high

transaction costs of securitization by spreading them over broader base It benefits sponsors

by allowing them to lock in funding and to take timely advantage of market opportunities It

benefits investors by allowing them to purchase fixed income investments they believe are

attractive for their portfolio without waiting for all of the underlying assets to be created

An investor must consider whether the sponsor can originate sufficient additional assets

during the pre-funded period for the issuer to purchase failure to do so results in prepayment

to the security holders of the amounts remaining in the pre-funded account with probable

decrease in the duration and yield of the securities We understand that the standard practice is

to disclose these risks in the prospectus.2

Sponsors seeking regular access to the structured finance market have strong incentives

to make sure that amounts in the pre-funded account are successfully invested in additional

assets There would be serious negative long term market consequences to sponsor ifi cash

in the pre-funded account was returned to securityholders or iithe issuer purchased additional

assets which did not meet the expectations of securityholders even ifthe assets complied with

the terms of the governing documents An issuers ability to sell securities with pre-fimded

component is dependent on the markets confidence that the issuer will successfully complete the

pre-funding To the extent that the markets confidence waned in particular issuers ability to

successfully utilize pre-funded amounts the pricing of the securities would reflect that concern

Issuers regularly invest servicing accounts in MMFs but are reluctant to do so with pre

funded accounts due to regulatoty uncertainty As result pre-funded accounts are being

invested directly in money market instruments such as commercial paper We understand that

the Staff has concerns about issuers exempt from the 1940 Act investing sizeable percentage

of their assets in registered investment companies for other than short-term cash management

purposes thereby avoiding registration under the 1940 Act even though the underlying

For example see Registration Statement No.333-07249 August 12 1996 for The CIT

RV Trust 1996-B in which the issuer sought to sell securities with face value of $240000000

The initial assets had value of approximately $164000000 with the balance of the remaining

$76000000 to be held in pre-funded account for maximum of 90 days The risk factors

segment of the prospectus had an extensive discussion of the risk of pre-payment if the

sponsor did not generate sufficient assets which met the eligibility criteria of the issuer within

the pre-funding period or ii if rating agency after receiving prior notice of the issuers

intention to purchase certain additional assets pursuant to the governing documents advised the

issuer of its intention to modify its rating of the issuers outstanding securities

5888 16-8
Securities and Exchange Commission

investments may be similarto those of registered investment company However we believe

these investments are permitted under Rule 3a-7 and that the Staff could adequately address its

concerns in way other than de-facto prohibition

If MMF investments are permitted forthe servicing account they should logically be

permitted for other short-term cash management purposes The use of MMFs allows

diversification continuous professional management enhanced liquidity and lower costs in an

entity regulated by the Commission under the 1940 Act Prohibiting such use results in credit

concentrations management only at the time the investment is made rather than the continuous

professional management of mutual fund liquidity which is dependent solely on the market for

the securities held by the issuer and lower returns while depriving investors of the safeguards

of the 1940 Act This raises issuance costs and diminishes investor protection Moreover pre

funded accounts may in many cases be invested in the commercial paper of single issuer or at

best few issuers resulting in possibly unsound credit concentrations It seems somewhat

illogical to restrict the use of MMFs in circumstances for which they are the ideal short-term

money management vehicle

BASIS FOR THE NO-ACTION REQUEST

Rule 3a-7 excludes certain issuers engaged in the business of acquiring and holding

eligible assets from the definition of investment company under the 1940 Act In drafting

the rule the Commission was careful to include certain provisions to advance its goal of allowing

the rule to accommodate developments in the markets At the same time these provisions were

carefully crafted to allow the Commission the opportunity to consider such developments in light

of the intent of the rule and to act accordingly For example in the Issuing Release the

Commission stated that

Although the definition of eligible assets is intended to be broad

it is impossible to devise definition of eligible assets that will

include all types of assets that can be securitized Accordingly

issuers or other parties on their behalf may request that the

Division of Investment Management take no-action position

with respect to the holding of specified assets that do not meet the

definition ofeligible assets provided such assets meet the intent

of the definition 52 SEC Docket at 2576 fn 17

We are of the opinion that investment of the pre-flinded account by an issuer in MMFs

is permissible under Rule 3a-7 and respectfully request the Staffs written concurrence in the

opinion set forth herein We recognize that given the intent of the rule the StafFs concurrence

might be contingent on limitations as to the amount of the pre-funding and the length of the pre

funding period

5888 16-8
Securities and Exchange Commission 10

Rule 3a-7a is available to any issuer who is engaged in the business of purchasing or

otherwise acquiring and holding eligible assets.. and in activities related or incidental thereto

added The underlined language was not in the Proposing Release but was added

by the Issuing Release to make sure that issuers were not subject to unduly narrow restrictions

on the scope of their activities The Issuing Release states that the purpose of this added

language was to provide flexibility to issuers In Citicorp Securities Inc SEC April 1995 the

Staff provided further guidance when it stated that It is the Divisions view that the related

or incidental activities permitted by Rule 3a-7 include only those activities that support or

further and therefore are secondary to the entitys business of purchasing or otherwise

acquiring and holding eligible assets In meeting this standard the staff relied on the opinion

of counsel to the issuer that the issuer was engaged solely in the business of acquiring and

holding eligible assets and iithe related activity was an activity related to or incidental to that

business

We are of the opinion that the investing of pre-funded accounts in MMFs during the

pre-funded period is secondary activity which supports an issuers primary activity of acquiring

and holding eligible assets and that such activity meets the standard of related to or incidental

thereto set forth in Rule 3a-7 Whether or not particular issuer is engaged solely in the business

of acquiring and holding eligible assets should be covered by an opinion issued by counsel to

particular issuer

Pursuant to Release No 33-6269 seven additional copies of this letter are enclosed

Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Stephen Burger of this office 212-732-3200

ifyou require any further information concerning the matter addressed in this letter

Sin7c7

Bernard Karol

BJKslf

cc Eugene Maloney Esq

588816-8