alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Analex Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), we, Sterling E. Phillips, Jr. and Ronald B. Alexander, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company. 

 

/S/ Sterling E. Phillips,Jr.                                            

Sterling E. Phillips, Jr. 

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 

 

March 24, 2005 

 

/S/ Ronald B.Alexander                                              

Ronald B. Alexander 

Chief Financial Officer 

 

March 24, 2005
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 10.8


                             AMENDING AGREEMENT

          THIS AGREEMENT dated as of the 23rd day of January, 1998,

B E T W E E N:

                           ROYAL OAK MINES INC.
                          (hereinafter called the "Corporation")

                                                            OF THE FIRST PART
                          -AND-

                          GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO.
                          (hereinafter called the "Holder")

                                                           OF THE SECOND PART



     WHEREAS the Corporation issued to the Holder a Senior Secured Debenture 
(the "Debenture") dated as of December 31, 1997 in the principal amount of 
U.S.$16,100,000;

     AND WHEREAS the Corporation and the Holder wish to amend the Debenture 
on the terms hereinafter set forth;

     NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSES that in consideration of the 
premises herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the 
receipt and adequacy of which consideration are hereby acknowledged, the 
parties hereto agree as follow:

1.   In paragraph (g) of the definition of "Permitted Encumbrances" in 
Schedule "A" to the Debenture, the reference to "Cdn. $5,000,000" is hereby 
amended and revised to "Cdn. $10,000,000".

2.   Subparagraph (i) of section 4.3.7 of the Debenture is hereby amended by 
adding the following words in the last line thereof after the words 
"Subordinated Note Trust Indenture":

     "together with additional interest if and when due of one-half of one 
percent (.50%) per annum for the period following 18 months after the date 
hereof".

3.   The foregoing amendments shall be effective as of and from the date 
hereof.

4.   In all other respects the parties hereto confirm the terms of the 
Debenture.




<PAGE>


                                    Page 2


5.   This Agreement may be signed in counterparts and each of such 
counterparts shall constitute an original document and such counterparts, 
taken together, shall constitute one and the same instrument.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Agreement has been executed by the parties 
hereto as of the date first above written.

                                      ROYAL OAK MINES INC.



                                      By:  /s/ James H. Wood
                                           ----------------------------------
                                           Name :  James H. Wood
                                           Title:  Chief Financial Officer


                                      GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO.



                                      By:  
                                           ----------------------------------
                                           Name : 
                                           Title:
FROM: THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, COUNTY OF ROSEBUD,

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. CODY R. MIX, Defendant.

NO. DC-87-29 DECISION

DATED this 8th day of March, 1990.

On March 31, 1988, the Defendant was sentenced to one hundred 5(100) years for Deliberate Homicide plus ten (10) years for the use of a weapon; the sentences shall be served consecutively; and he must complete restitution for Court Appointed Counsel; restitution for expenses of the victim’s funeral in the amount of $5,185; plus receive credit for 211 days credit for time served; dangerous designation.

On March 8,1990, the Defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The Defendant was present and was represented by Roger Carey, of the Montana Defender Project. The state was represented by Marvin Quinlan, Deputy County Attorney from Rosebud County.

Before hearing the application, the Defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase itifsuchis possible. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

After careful consideration, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence imposed shall be remanded back to the Sixteenth Judicial District for findings as to the reasons for designating the defendant as a dangerous offender for parole purposes as required by MCA, Sec. 46-18-404(3).

The sentence is further remanded to the District Court to either suspend the restitution ordered for the cost of court appointed counsel and for expenses of the victim’s funeral or to suspend a portion of the sentence imposed to allow defendant time within which to pay such restitution; restitution may only be ordered as a reasonable condition during the period of a suspended or deferred sentence, pursuant to MCA, Sec. 46-18-201.

The sentence shall then be returned to the Sentence Review Division for its final decision.
#### Benjamin A. Hartstein v. Isaac S. Heller.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 7 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 7

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. POCKET VERSION OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

    (a) In General.--The 26th edition of the pocket version of the 
Constitution of the United States shall be printed as a Senate document 
under the direction of the Joint Committee on Printing.
    (b) Additional Copies.--In addition to the usual number, there 
shall be printed the lesser of--
            (1) 480,500 copies of the document, of which 255,500 copies 
        shall be for the use of the House of Representatives, 200,000 
        copies shall be for the use of the Senate, and 25,000 copies 
        shall be for the use of the Joint Committee on Printing; or
            (2) such number of copies of the document as does not 
        exceed a total production and printing cost of $226,250, with 
        distribution to be allocated in the same proportion as 
        described in paragraph (1), except that in no case shall the 
        number of copies be less than 1 per Member of Congress.
    (c) Distribution.--The copies of the document printed for the use 
of the House of Representatives and the Senate under subsection (a) 
shall be distributed in accordance with--
            (1) a distribution plan approved by the chair and ranking 
        minority member of the Committee on House Administration of the 
        House of Representatives, in the case of the copies printed for 
        the use of the House of Representatives; and
            (2) a distribution plan approved by the chair and ranking 
        minority member of the Committee on Rules and Administration of 
        the Senate, in the case of the copies printed for the use of 
        the Senate.

            Passed the Senate February 28, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. CON. RES. 7

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Authorizing the printing of the 26th edition of the pocket version of 
                 the Constitution of the United States.
```
### §406d–5. Use for reclamation purposes of certain lands within exterior boundary

Nothing in this Act shall affect the use for reclamation purposes, in accordance with the Act of June 17, 1902 (32 Stat. 388), and Acts amendatory thereof or supplementary thereto, of the lands within the exterior boundary of the park as prescribed by this Act which have been withdrawn or acquired for reclamation purposes or the operation, maintenance, rehabilitation, and improvement of the reservoir and other reclamation facilities located on such withdrawn or acquired lands.

(Sept. 14, 1950, ch. 950, §9, 64 Stat. 853.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is act Sept. 14, 1950, ch. 950, 64 Stat. 849, which enacted this section, sections 406d–1 to 406d–4, 431a, 451a, 482m, 673b, and 673c of this title, and provisions set out as notes under section 406d–1 of this title. Section 1 of the Act was partially repealed and restated as sections 104907 and 320301(d) of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs, by Pub. L. 113–287, §§3, 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3094, 3272. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

Act of June 17, 1902 (32 Stat. 388), referred to in text, is popularly known as the "Reclamation Act" and is classified generally to chapter 12 (§371 et seq.) of Title 43, Public Lands. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 371 of Title 43 and Tables.

#### Codification

Section comprises only the first sentence of section 9 of act Sept. 14, 1950. The second sentence of section 9 repealed all laws "inconsistent with" the act Sept. 14, 1950, ch. 950, and is set out in a note under section 406d–1 of this title. The third sentence thereof, which related to availability of unexpended appropriated funds, is also set out in a note under section 406d–1 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeal of Inconsistent Laws

Repeal of laws inconsistent with act Sept. 14, 1950, see note set out under section 406d–1 of this title.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Fantastic   Financial
Corporation,  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, B. Stephen Bailey, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2011269EN.01003904.xml

| 10.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/39

---

Order of the President of the Court of 6 July 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Treviso — Italy) — Procura della Repubblica v Elena Vermisheva

(Case C-187/11) (1)

1

2011/C 269/85

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 211, 16.7.2011.

1

---
§ 36.305 Alternatives to barrier removal. ( a ) *General.* Where a public accommodation can demonstrate that barrier removal is not readily achievable, the public accommodation shall not fail to make its goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations available through alternative methods, if those methods are readily achievable.
( b ) *Examples.* Examples of alternatives to barrier removal include, but are not limited to, the following actions— ( 1 ) Providing curb service or home delivery;
( 2 ) Retrieving merchandise from inaccessible shelves or racks;
( 3 ) Relocating activities to accessible locations;
( c ) *Multiscreen cinemas.* If it is not readily achievable to remove barriers to provide access by persons with mobility impairments to all of the theaters of a multiscreen cinema, the cinema shall establish a film rotation schedule that provides reasonable access for individuals who use wheelchairs to all films. Reasonable notice shall be provided to the public as to the location and time of accessible showings.
§ 48.13 Record for decision. ( a ) The record on which the Attorney General shall base his decision in the event a hearing is not held shall be comprised of all material filed in accordance with these regulations, including any material that has been ordered withheld from public disclosure.
( b ) If a hearing is held, the record on which the Attorney General shall base his decision shall consist exclusively of the hearing record, the examiner's recommendation and any exceptions and responses filed with respect thereto.
### §163. Jurisdiction by the United States; fugitives from justice

Sole and exclusive jurisdiction is assumed by the United States over the territory embraced within the Glacier National Park, saving, however, to the State of Montana the right to serve civil or criminal process within the limits of the aforesaid park in suits or prosecution for or on account of rights acquired, obligations incurred, or crimes committed in said State but outside of said park, and saving, further, to the said State the right to tax persons and corporations, their franchises and property, on the lands included in said park. All the laws applicable to places under the sole and exclusive jurisdiction of the United States shall have force and effect in said park. All fugitives from justice taking refuge in said park shall be subject to the same laws as refugees from justice found in the State of Montana.

(Aug. 22, 1914, ch. 264, §1, 38 Stat. 699.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

A provision accepting the act of the Montana Legislature which ceded to the United States Exclusive Jurisdiction over the Territory referred to in this section has been omitted as executed.
#### § 20.2 Authority.

These regulations are issued pursuant to sections 501 and 524(b) of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended by the Crime Control Act of 1973, Public Law 93-83, 87 Stat. 197, 42 U.S.C. 3701, *et seq.* (Act), 28 U.S.C. 534, Public Law 92-544, 86 Stat. 1115, and Public Law 117-159, 136 Stat. 1331.

[AG Order No. 5949-2024, 89 FR 54346, July 1, 2024]
### (This page intentionally blank.)

## J ! r"'- .~ ~ 

# ~ a: w I. li LL or.:: ~ 

### ~.,r: C w !- 

# ~ ~ 

## w :::J \_~~. Z' ~~ --W'" ~ .;..J a: WW I- aJ .a: '. W ::)0 -lW I-LL 0.. a: a: W 20UJI-aJ LLI-° ~UJLLI- . 

### ~CC~a:'-J

0 cr: 0 U 

### :w cr: .< 1 

## ,J;; ~ 

### ;10 0

~ W 

## u: LiJ C.!J 

## « C-

'. J' 

## a: w I-U<:(

W -IW r-U- CLa:a: W :?:OWl-m U-I-O Wu-f-;, UJOO<:(Q:



## a: UJ

### rUJ 

### ;~ 

## ~ 0

~ u <{ f-E@ 

# ~ c.s :r~ 

# ~ '-J\-:::.

II 

# ~ ~\ 

# - 0 --' I , I , o~ -~ No ~,o -0 0" -r 

## ~~ -'-::>-, """' ~W --~ W--- ~ 0 > c: 

## ~-C)C:f-#~>O 

# ~~;r:~~-N--:- .W 2: -~ (/) 0 N 0 :s s: 

### O~W~U)~20U22: Z f--==U)c: f-""f-WLU~OOQOO UZZf-c: WWUJWW Wf-Wc:~~:2:2:22:2: """1ZmW .f-~~~::>~ o~~tuc:«tnu)(/)(/)(/) C:-.J-== ~f-U)(/)(/)(/)(/) 

### ~~~~LI)U).~~~~~ 

# ~ I \:~

14.. 

## <1II 

## I~o IWN 

### ~:r: U- . -c: a: °- 

# 10 -

>- 0- !::: ("\/ U a...I 0-0 . -l c: W .- 

# '> - 

# '" <a:--: "., l.U ~ 

## '-' ~ . >-l.U:J a:~(.) 

## 0 - !::. U) UJ 

### ~ => f- <{ 

## a: w Cl. :?: w f- - a.. "'OJ 

### ,,==u- .G<;J.. =>

## > 

# . a.. ..§

~ 

# ~ 

# it( - 

# ~ I:~,\



# . 

# ". .f



# i~ 

# !~f I~ I 

# R i.r. 

# ~



# !~ 

# ~~~ I

# f ~ 

# ... ...1< 

# ffi



# ~; '~

~
~ 

# ~~*

~ 

## , j



## ~ t<



# r. I 

# ~~ (oc'-

## I



# I~ 

# l~ e



# f

I~ 

# f

I



# ~ )~ ,t--



# 1 ~ OJ' >1" co I 

## u

,« :1- It/)



### ~' ro(California Air Resources Boarcf Monitoring & Laboratory Division Method 425 Recovery Field Data Sheet 

# eUJV't$ 4 Project: Project #: Page: Project Lead: Container
.,No.3 (Irnpinger 2) I 

### SilicaGelI Cartridge! (Weight Only) Total Stack



### Moisture. q~- (Probe Rinse) Container



### No.2 (Impinqer 1) 

# c.-It-1

IRur It> 11 1 ,10) 

### Tare Final Diff r"D

# ~~ --~-~,/~~ /o~~

~

I. I 1/17, e!:-

(OOt~ .-1/3 Ie, 7 

## If;]".



# . Container No.2 (Impin.Qer 1)



### OS,tl/ 

## ..r : / 1/75-0,0 II, 3 1 -_3./,'3 Jf;J' " , 0\.1' Silica (;;t:I Cartridge (Weight Qnly) Container No.3 ..-(Impin er 2 

### 10 Ii) I.OO..~ Dl.O 

# q 'f , Total Stack Moisture, .Qm Container 

### No.1 (Probe Rinse)

### c..4'ZRun# 

## Le...



# - - 7L

Container el No.2 No.3 Cartridge (Impinger 1 .er 2) (Weight OnI )

Ii) 

### Tare Final Diff lOO ..~ 3- IJ'7 13'-0 ..~ 

### JLf,,7 Total Stack Moisture, 

## gm



# - fD l.,



## {tJC. JIf.7

It 

## JiJ..7 

# ~~ I~ Container No.3(Impin.Qer 2) (Probe Rinse) 

### Run# 

# ¥-

Tare Final Diff



# ~:~~ 10&',/

.'~ 

# ~ 'f.cf-

.~';i,L.:.\\:: Container No.2 (!!!!~inger 1) Container

No.3 (ImpinQer 2) Silica Gel

Cartridge (Weight Only) Total Stack

Moisture, !:1m 

# ~q3 "S-t>~ Container



### No.1 (Probe Rinse) Run# Tare

Final Diff . 

## 7,7,7 

# ~

.. ~ ~~ 

### pH Tare (gm) Final (gm). Diff (gm) IRun#


## ll.

W:IForms IStack Testingl425Recov.xls Container 

### No.1

1#: 

### pHil (gm) 

### (gml, 

## ~m)
pH (gm) (gm) (gml 

### Container

No.1 

### pHll (gm) (gm) (gm.l
pH 

### (gm) (gm) (gm)
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION





I, Dirk
Benschop, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Teleconnect Inc. for the three
month period ended December 31, 2008;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:





a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepare





b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and





c)
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;





5. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





a) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and





6. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





September
22, 2009








By:
              /s/
      Dirk BenschopDirk
      Benschop,Director,
      Chief Executive Officer,President
      and Treasurer
Order entered April 15 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05
- 12
- 01476
- CR
JOSE FRANCISCO ORTEZ , Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial C ourt Cause No. F01
- 52273
- M


### O RDER Appellant has informed the Court that he wishes to file a pro se response to the Anders brief filed by appellate counsel. Accordingly, we ORDER appellate counsel Matthew Kita to provide appellant with copies of the cler k’s record and the complete reporter’s records. We
further ORDER Mr. Kita to provide this Court, within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order, with written verification that the record has been sent to appellant. Appellant’s pro se response is due by JUL Y 5, 2013

. We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order , by electronic transmission, to the Honorable Ernest White, Presiding Judge, 194th Judicial District Court, and to Matthew Kita.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send a cop y of this order, by first

- class mail, to Jose Francisco Ortez, No. 12049367, Dallas County Jail, P.O. Box 660334, Dallas, Texas 75266

- 0334./s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE