UNITED STATES 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20549 

DIVISION OF 

INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT 

October 20,2008 

4. 0 

Jack W: Murphy 

Dechert LLP 

1775 I Street, N.W. 

Washington, DC 20006-2401 

Re: Dreyfbs Cash Management Plus, Inc. (File No. 81 1-05295) 

Dear Mr. Murphy: 

Your letter of September 17,2008 requests our assurance that we would not recommend . - -

that the Commission take any enforcement action under Sections 1 7(a) ',1 7(d12 and 1 2(d)(313 -of 

the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "Act"), and the rules thereunder, if Dreyfbs Cash 

Management Plus, Inc. (the "Fund), and The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation ("BNY 

Mellon"), enter into the arrangement summarized below and more fully described in the letter. 

The Dreyfus Corporation (the "Advisery') is an investment adviser registered under the 

Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and is the Funds' investment adviser. BNY Mellon is the 

parent company of the Adviser. 

The Fund is an open-end management investment company that is registered with the 

Commission under the Act. The Fund is a money market fund that seeks to maintain a stable net 

1 Section 17(a)(l) generally makes it unlawful for any affiliated person of a registered investment 

company, or an affiliated person of such person, acting as principal, to knowingly sell any 

security or other property to the registered investment company. 

2 Section 17(d) generally makes it unlawful for any affiliated person of a registered iniestment 

company, or any affiliated person of such a person, acting as principal, to effect any transaction 

in which the registered investment company is a joint or joint and several participant with such 

person in contravention of rules and regulations adopted by the Commission. 

3 Section 12(d)(3) generally makes it unlawful for any registered investment company to acquire 

any security issued by, or any interest in the business of, any broker-dealer, any person engaged 

in the business of underwriting, or an investment adviser of an investment company, or an 

investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. 
asset value per share of $1 .OO and uses the amortized cost method of valuation in valuing its 

portfolio securities as permitted by rule 2a-7 under the Act. 

You state that the Fund holds in its portfolio notes (the "Notes") issued by Lehman 

Brothers Holdings Inc. ("Lehman") in the amounts listed in Exhibit I to your letter. Lehman filed 

for bankruptcy protection on September 15,2008. You state that the Adviser believes and has 

conveyed to the Fund's Board of Directors (the "Board"), that the an Event of Insolvency, as 

defined in rule 2a-7 under the Act (with reference to rule 5b-3 under the Act), has occurred with 

respect to the Notes. You state further that current market conditions could affect the orderly 

disposition of the Notes and that a sale of the Notes could cause a Fund to realize 10.sses and no - longer maintain a stable net asset value per share. You also state that the Board, including a 

majority of the trustees that are not interested persons of the Fund as that term is defined in 

section 2(a)(19) of the Act, has determined that it would not be in the best interests of the Fund 

and its shareholders to dispose of the Notes at this time. 

You state that in order to limit the risk of loss to the Funds, BNY Mellon and the Fund 

seek to enter into a capital support agreement (the "Agreement"), a form of which was provided 

to the staff. Under the Agreement, BNY Mellon would be obligated to make a cash contribution 

to the Fund in any of the following circumstances (each, a "Contribution Event"): (i) any sale of 

the Notes by the Fund for cash in an amount less than the amortized cost value of the Notes; 

(ii) receipt of a final payment on the Notes in an amount less than their amortized cost value; (iii); ' 


issuance of an order by a court having jurisdiction over the matter discharging Lehrnan fiom " 


liability for the Notes and providing for payments in an amount less than the amortized cost 


value of the Notes; or (iv) receipt of new securities that are Eligible Securities in exchange for or 


in replacement of any Notes if the amortized cost value of the new securities is less than the 


amortized cost value of the Notes exchanged or replaced. 


You represent with respect to the Agreement that: 

(i) 	 The Agreement would obligate BNY Mellon upon the occurrence of a 

Contribution Event to make a cash contribution to the Fund (up to the maximum 

amount specified in the Agreement) in an amount sufficient to maintain the 

Fund's net asset value per share at the minimum permissible net asset value per 

share specified in the Agreement; 

(ii) 	 The Agreement would be entered into at no cost to the Fund, and BNY Mellon 

would not obtain any shares fiom the Fund in exchange for its contribution; 

(iii) 	 If the Agreement is deemed to be a security within the meaning of section 2(a)(36) 

of the Act, it would qualify as an Eligible Security (as defined in rule 2a-7 under 

the Act) because BNY Mellon has received a rating in the highest short-term 

category from a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization with 

respect to a class of debt obligations that is comparable in priority and security to 

the Agreement; 
(iv) 	 The Board, or its delegate, has determined that the Agreement presents minimal 

credit risks with respect to the Fund; 

(v) 	 The Fund will sell all the Notes on the business day immediately prior to the 

termination date specified in the Agreement, if such sale would trigger a cash 

contribution under the Agreement; 

(vi) 	 The Agreement would terminate following a change in BNY Mellon's short-term 

credit ratings, unless BNY Mellon puts in place a substitute arrangement that is a 

First Tier Security within 15 calendar days after such occurregce. If BNY Mellon 

is unable to put in place a substitute arrangement that is a First Tier Security, the 

Fund will sell the Notes and BNY Mellon would be obligated to make the capital 

contribution required under the Agreement as a result of the sale; and 

(vii) 	 The Board has reviewed and approved the Agreement, including the aggregate 

maximum capital contribution amount, and has determined that entering into the 

Agreement is in the best interests of the Fund and its shareholders. 

On the basis of the facts and representations in your letter, we will not recommend 

enforcement action under Sections 17(a), 17(d) and 12(d)(3) of the Act, or the rules thereunder, if 

the Fund and BNY Mellon enter into the arrangement summarized above and more fully . . 

described in your letter.4 You should note that any different facts or representations might . 

require a different conclusion. Moreover, this response expresses the Division's position on 

enforcement action only and does not express any legal conclusions on the issues presented.5 

! Very truly yours, 

Dalia-Osman Blass 

Senior Counsel 

4 This letter confirms oral no-action relief provided by the undersigned to Julien Bourgeois on 

September 16,2008. 

5 The Division of Investment Management generally permits third parties to rely on no-action or 

interpretive letters to the extent that the third party's facts and circumstances are substantially 

similar to those described in the underlying request for a no-action or interpretive letter. 

Investment Company Act Release No. 22587 (Mar. 27, 1997) n. 20. In light of the very factspecific nature of the Fund's request, however, the position expressed in this letter applies only 

to the entities seeking relief, and no other entity may rely on this position. Other funds facing 

similar legal issues should contact the staff of the Division about the availability of no-action 

relief. 
1775 1 Street, N.W. 

Washington, DC 20006-2401 Dechert +I 202 261 3300 Main

LLP +I 202 261 3333 Fax 

JULIEN BOURGEOIS 

julien.bourgeois@dechert.com 

+I202 261 3451 Direct 

+I202 261 3151 Fax 

Investment Company Act of 1940 

Sections 12(d)(3), 17(a)(l), Section 17(d) and Rule 17d-1 

September 17,2008 

Robert E. Plaze 

Associate Director 

Division of Investment Management 

U.S.Securities and Exchange Commission 


100F Street, N.E. 


Washington, DC 20549 


Re: Dreyfus Cash Management Plus, Inc. 

Dear Mr. Plaze: 

We are writing to you on behalf of Drefis Cash Management Plus, Inc. (the "Fund"), an openend management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 

"1940 Act") for which The Drefis Corporation ("Dreyfus") serves as investment adviser. We 

respectfully request assurance that the staff of the Division of Investment Management will not 

recommend enforcement action to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 

("Commission") under Sections 12(d)(3), 17(a)(l) and 17(d) of the 1940 Act, or the rules 

thereunder, if the Fund enters into the arrangement discussed below with The Bank of New York 

Mellon Corporation ("BNY Mellon"), the parent company of Drefis. 

BACKGROUND AND PROPOSAL 

The Fund complies with Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act, and thus has undertaken to maintain a 

stable net asset value per share, which has been established at $1.00. The net asset value per 

share of the Fund is computed in compliance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7, using the 

"Amortized Cost Method" (as that term is defined in the rule). As of September 16, 2008, the 

Fund held notes issued by Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. ("Lehrnan Holdings") in the amount 

and with the maturity shown on Exhibit I to this letter (the bbNotes7'). Because Lehrnan Holdings 

filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, Drefis 

believes, and has conveyed to the Board of Directors of the Fund (the "Board'), that an "Event of 

US Austin Boston Charlotte Hartford New York Newport Beach Philadelphia Princeton San Francisco Silicon Valley Washington DC 

EUROPE Brussels London Luxembourg Munich Paris ASIA Beijing Hong Kong 
Dechert September 17,2008 

Page 2 

Insolvency" (as that term is defined in 5b-3(c)(2) under the 1940 Act and used for purposes of 

Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act) occurred with respect to Lehman Holdings. 

The Board, including a majority of the Directors that are not interested persons of the Fund, has 

determined that it is in the best interests of the Fund not to dispose of the Notes at this time. The 

Board believes that current market conditions could affect the orderly disposition of the Notes 

and that a sale of the Notes could cause the Fund to realize losses and no longer maintain a stable 

net asset value per share. However, to limit the risk of loss to the Fund, BNY Mellon has 

proposed to support the Fund by entering into an irrevocable Capital Support Agreement with the 

Fund (a "Capital Support Agreement"). The Board has considered the proposed arrangement and 

has determined that it is in the best interests of the Fund and its shareholders. 

Under the Capital Support Agreement, BNY Mellon would be obligated to provide a capital 

contribution to the Fund if, as a result of losses realized on the Notes (e.g.,due to a sale of the 

Notes or receipt of final payment on the Notes in an amount less than the amount due), the 

market-based net asset value per share of the Fund drops below a set level. The amount of any 

capital contribution by BNY Mellon to the Fund will be that necessary to maintain the Fund's 

market-based net asset value per share at the minimum permissible net asset value specified in 

each Capital Support Agreement, subject to an aggregate capital support amount specified in the 

agreement. No fees or expenses would be incurred by the Fund for entering into the Capital 

Support Agreement and BNY Mellon would not receive any shares or other consideration from 

the Fund. Because of BNY Mellon's short-term credit rating, to the extent that the Capital 

Support Agreement is deemed to be a security held by the Fund, BNY Mellon's commitment 

under the Capital Support Agreement would be a First Tier Rated Security under Rule 2a-7 under 

the 1940 Act and it would present minimal credit risks. 

The Capital Support Agreement is expected to remain in place until the earliest of (the 

"termination date"): (i) the repayment in full of the Notes; (ii) BNY Mellon making payments to 

the Fund equal to the maximum amount provided for under the Capital Support Agreement; (iii) 

the date on which the Fund no longer holds any Note; (iv) the mutual agreement of the parties; 

and (iv) 5:00 p.m. New York time on the date that is 364 days following the date of the Capital 

Support Agreement. The agreement's term will not be extended by the parties without the prior 

consent of the staff of the Division of Investment Management and notice of amendments must 

be given to the staff. If BNY Mellon's short-term credit rating changes such that BNY Mellon's 

commitment under the Capital Support Agreement no longer qualifies as a First Tier Rated 

Security, BNY Mellon may substitute an obligation or support that satisfies the requirements of a 

First Tier Security within 15 days. Otherwise, the Fund would sell the Notes it holds and BNY 

Mellon would be obligated to make the capital contribution required under the Capital Support 

Agreement as a result of the sale. Similarly, if, on the business day immediately prior to the 

termination date, the Fund holds any Notes the sale of which at that time would require a capital 
September 17,2008 Dechert L L P Page 3 

contribution under the Capital Support Agreement, the Fund will sell the Notes prior to 

termination of the Capital Support Agreement. 

LEGAL ISSUES PRESENTED 

Dreyfus and BNY Mellon may be deemed to be affiliates of the Fund undy Section 2(a)(3) of the 

1940 Act. The entering of a Capital Support Agreement with the Fund may be subject to Section 

17(a)(l) of the 1940 Act, which makes it unlawll for any affiliated person of a registered 

investment company (or any affiliated person of such person) acting as principal knowingly to 

sell any security or other property to the investment company. 

The proposed arrangement may also fall within Section 17(d) of the 1940 Act, which makes it 

unlawful for any affiliated person (or any affiliated person of such person) of a registered 

investment company to effect any transaction in which such registered investment company is a 

joint, or joint and several participant, with such person in contravention of rules adopted by the 

Commission. 

The entering into the Capital Support Agreement with BNY Mellon may fall within Section 

12(d)(3) of the 1940 Act, which makes it unlawful for a registered investment company to 

purchase or otherwise acquire any security issued by or any other interest in the business of any 

person who acts as a broker, dealer or investment adviser to an investment company. The Fund 

could not rely upon the exemption provided under Rule 12d3-1 under the 1940 Act because the 

exemption does not extend to affiliated persons of the hd's investment adviser. 

It is submitted that, notwithstanding the foregoing, entering the Capital Support Agreement is in 

the best interest of the Fund. The Capital Support Agreement effectively protects the Fund fiom 

the risk that losses arising fiom the Fund's current exposure to the Notes might cause the Fund's 

net asset value per share to fall below $1.00. 

CONCLUSION 

Based on the foregoing, we respectfully request assurance that the staff would not recommend 

that the Commission take enforcement action against the Fund, Dreyfus, BNY Mellon or their 

affiliated persons under Section 17(a)(l), Section 17(d) or Section 12(d)(3) of the 1940 Act or the 

rules thereunder if the Fund, Dreyfbs and BNY Mellon enter into the arrangements discussed 

above and transactions contemplated thereby. 
Dechert 	 September 17,2008 

Page 4 

LLP 

We would be happy to answer any questions that the staff may have regarding this request or to 

provide additional information. Please do not hesitate to call the undersigned at 202.261.3451 or 

Jack W. Murphy at 202.261.3303. 

Sincerely, 

Julien Bourgeois 

cc: 	 Dalia 0.Blass -Division of Investment Management - SEC 

Stuart H. Coleman - Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP 

Michael A. Rosenberg -The Dreyfus Corporation 
September 17,2008 Dechert Page 5 

LLP 

EXHIBIT I TO NO-ACTION REQUEST 

Percent of 


Fund Net 


Assets as of 


September 16, Principal 

Fund Maturity 2008 Amount 

-

Dreyfus Cash Management 2/22/2009 ParAmount: $97,200,000 

Plus, Inc. (CUSP 0.68% 

number 

5252Owdk4) Market Price: 

0.21%