alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[114th Congress Public Law 14]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 129 STAT. 198]]

Public Law 114-14
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude certain 
  compensation received by public safety officers and their dependents 
        from gross income. <<NOTE: May 22, 2015 -  [H.R. 606]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Don't Tax Our 
Fallen Public Safety Heroes Act. 26 USC 1 note.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Don't Tax Our Fallen Public Safety 
Heroes Act''.
SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN COMPENSATION RECEIVED BY PUBLIC 
                    SAFETY OFFICERS AND THEIR DEPENDENTS.

    Subsection (a) of section 104 of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 <<NOTE: 26 USC 104.>>  is amended by striking ``and'' at the end of 
paragraph (4), by striking the period at the end of paragraph (5) and 
inserting ``; and'', and by inserting after paragraph (5) the following 
new paragraph:
            ``(6) amounts received pursuant to--
                    ``(A) section 1201 of the Omnibus Crime Control and 
                Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796); or
                    ``(B) a program established under the laws of any 
                State which provides monetary compensation for surviving 
                dependents of a public safety officer who has died as 
                the direct and proximate result of a personal injury 
                sustained in the line of duty,
        except that subparagraph (B) shall not apply to any amounts that 
        would have been payable if death of the public safety officer 
        had occurred other than as the direct and proximate result of a 
        personal injury sustained in the line of duty.''.

    Approved May 22, 2015.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 606 (S. 916):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

SENATE REPORTS: No. 114-26 (Comm. on Finance) accompanying S. 916.
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 161 (2015):
            May 12, considered and passed House.
            May 14, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 35366]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14400]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Bonneville Power Administration

Albany-Eugene Transmission Line Rebuild Project

AGENCY: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), Department of Energy 
(DOE).

ACTION: Notice of Availability of Record of Decision (ROD).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of the ROD to implement 
the Proposed Action Alternative, based on the Albany-Eugene 
Transmission Line Rebuild Project (DOE/EIS-0457, March 2012). BPA has 
decided to rebuild a 32-mile section of the existing Albany-Eugene 115-
kV transmission line that extends from the Albany Substation in the 
City of Albany in Linn County, Oregon, to the Alderwood Tap near 
Junction City in Lane County, Oregon. Rebuild activities will include 
removing and replacing existing wood-pole structures and associated 
structural components and conductors, establishing better access to the 
line, improving access roads, developing staging areas for storage of 
materials, removing vegetation including danger trees, and revegetating 
areas disturbed by construction activities. The existing structures 
will be replaced with structures of similar design within or near to 
their existing locations. The line will continue to operate at 115 kV.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the ROD and EIS may be obtained by calling BPA's 
toll-free document request line, 1-800-622-4520. The ROD and EIS 
Summary are also available on our Web site, www.efw.bpa.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Douglas Corkran, Bonneville Power 
Administration--KEC-4, P.O. Box 3621, Portland, Oregon 97208-3621; 
toll-free telephone number 1-800-622-4519; fax number 503-230-5699; or 
email dfcorkran@bpa.gov.

    Issued in Portland, Oregon, on June 1, 2012
Stephen J. Wright,
Administrator and Chief Executive Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-14400 Filed 6-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
----

|  |  777 Old Saw Mill River RoadTarrytown, New York 10591  (914) 789-2800www.progenics.com |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contact:  | Kathleen FredriksenCorporate Development(914) 789-2871kfredriksen@progenics.com |   |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Caprock Canyon  Investments,
Inc.,  on Form 10- QSB for the  period  ending  June 30,  2001 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the
undersigned, B. Stephen Bailey, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6717

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

STEVE JACOB JOSEPH, a/k/a Steve O,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, Chief District Judge. (2:14-cr-00008-MSD-DEM-2)

Submitted: October 22, 2021 Decided: December 16, 2021

Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steve Jacob Joseph, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Steve Jacob Joseph appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for 

compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). We review a court’s order 

granting or denying a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. United 

States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021). We have reviewed the record and 

conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion. The court denied Joseph’s motion after

finding that Joseph did not show extraordinary and compelling reasons and that the 

applicable 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors did not warrant his release. See United States v. 

High, 997 F.3d 181, 188-91 (4th Cir. 2021) (discussing amount of explanation required for 

denial of straightforward compassionate release motion). We therefore affirm the court’s 

order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Open Meeting of the 

SEC Advisory Committee on Improvements to Financial Reporting 

Thursday, July 31, 2008, Beginning at 1:00 P.M. 

 

AGENDA 

I. Introductory Remarks – Robert Pozen, Committee Chairman 

II. Consideration of Most Recent Comment Letters Received 

III. Review of Significant Changes from July 24 Draft 

IV. Proposal to Publish Final Report 

V. Adjournment (expected no later than 2:00 pm)
HomeLatest FilingsPrevious Page

    - SEC Home  »
    - Search the Next-Generation EDGAR System  »
    - Company Search  »
    - Current Page

950 3RD AVENEW YORK NY 10022         

950 3RD AVENEW YORK NY 10022         212-822-4259

Coller Secondaries Private Equity Opportunities Fund CIK#: 0001969180 (see all company filings)
State location: NY | State of Inc.: **DE** | Fiscal Year End: 0331formerly: Coller Private Market Secondaries Fund (filings through 2023-03-24)formerly: Coller Secondaries Private Equity Fund (filings through 2023-07-24)Get **insider transactions** for this **issuer**.File Number: **812-15527**

||
||
# C_2013009EN.01002202.xml

| 12.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/22

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 October 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy)) — Vivaio dei Molini Azienda Agricola Porro Savoldi ss v Autorità per la Vigilanza sui Contratti Pullici di lavori, servizi e forniture

(Case C-502/11) (1)

1

(Public works contracts - Directive 93/37/EEC - Article 6 - Principles of equal treatment and openness - Admissibility of rules reserving the right to participate in public tendering procedures to companies engaged in a commercial activity and excluding civil partnerships (società semplici) - Institutional and statutory objectives - Agricultural undertakings)

2013/C 9/36

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Vivaio dei Molini Azienda Agricola Porro Savoldi ss

Applicant:

Defendant: Autorita per la Vigilanza sui Contratti Pullici di lavori, servizi e forniture

Defendant:

in the presence of: SOA CQOP Costruttori Qualificati Opere Pubbliche SpA, Unione Provinciale Agricoltori di Brescia

in the presence of:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consiglio di Stato — Interpretation of Article 6 of Council Directive 93/37/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts (OJ 1993 L 199, p. 54) — Principle of non-discrimination — National legislation reserving the right to participate in public tendering procedures to companies engaged in a commercial activity and excluding agricultural undertakings in the form of civil partnerships (società semplici)

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

European Union law, in particular Article 6 of Council Directive 93/37/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, as amended by Commission Directive 2001/78/EC of 13 September 2001, precludes national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which prohibits an undertaking such as a civil partnership having the status of ‘contractor’ within the meaning of Directive 93/37 from participating in public procurement procedures solely on the ground of its legal form.

---

(1)  OJ C 347, 26.11.2011.

1

---
### §273d. Administration, protection, and development

#### (a) Authority of Secretary

The National Park Service, under the direction of the Secretary, shall administer, protect, and develop the park, subject to the provisions of the Act entitled "An Act to establish a National Park Service, and for other purposes", approved August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535) as amended and supplemented (16 U.S.C. 1–4).1

#### (b) Easements and rights-of-way

The Secretary shall grant easements and rights-of-way on a nondiscriminatory basis upon, over, under, across, or along any component of the park area unless he finds that the route of such easements and rights-of-way would have significant adverse effects on the administration of the park.

#### (c) Report by Secretary

Within three years from December 18, 1971, the Secretary of the Interior shall report to the President, in accordance with subsections 3(c) and 3(d) of the Wilderness Act [16 U.S.C. 1132 (c) and (d)], his recommendations as to the suitability or nonsuitability of any area within the park for preservation as wilderness, and any designation of any such area as a wilderness shall be in accordance with said Wilderness Act [16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.].

(Pub. L. 92–207, §5, Dec. 18, 1971, 85 Stat. 740.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Act entitled "An Act to establish a National Park Service, and for other purposes", approved August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535) as amended and supplemented (16 U.S.C. 1–4), referred to in subsec. (a), is act Aug. 25, 1916, ch. 408, 39 Stat. 535, known as the National Park Service Organic Act, which enacted sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 of this title and provisions set out as a note under section 100101 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs. Sections 1 to 4 of the Act were repealed and restated as section 1865(a) of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and section 100101(a), chapter 1003, and sections 100751(a), 100752, 100753, and 102101 of Title 54 by Pub. L. 113–287, §§3, 4(a)(1), 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3094, 3260, 3272. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables. For disposition of former sections of this title, see Disposition Table preceding section 100101 of Title 54.

The Wilderness Act, referred to in subsec. (c), is Pub. L. 88–577, Sept. 3, 1964, 78 Stat. 890, which is classified generally to chapter 23 (§1131 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1131 of this title and Tables.

1 See References in Text note below.
Exhibit 32.1


                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(b) OR
                     RULE 15D-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SEC.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  quarterly  report  of  Sharp Holding Corporation (the
"Company")  on  Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George
Sharp,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sec.1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  Based on my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  Based  on my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial condition and results of
operations  of  the  Company.

Date:     AUGUST 20, 2004

/S/  GEORGE SHARP
-----------------
GEORGE SHARP
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF SHARP HOLDING CORPORATION


                                       22
<PAGE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 2, 2016

a0418 

# Order

Clerk May 2, 2016

150859

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 150859

COA: 317355

St Clair CC: 12

- 002640

- FH

DAVID WAYNE CUTTER,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 25, 2014

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, p ursuant to MCR 7.305( H)(1), in

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE in part the judgment of the Court of

Appeals, and we REMAND this case to the St. Clair Circuit Court to determine whether

the court would have imposed a materially different sentence under the sentenci ng

procedure described in People v Lockridge , 498 Mich 358 (2015). On remand, the trial

court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial court

determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitu tional

constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If, however, the trial

court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence absent the

unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendan t. In all other

respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining

question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
### §3151. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 96–487, title X, §1011, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2457; Pub. L. 102–285, §10(b), May 18, 1992, 106 Stat. 172, which required the President to annually transmit to Congress all pertinent public information relating to minerals in Alaska gathered by the United States Geological Surveys, United States Bureau of Mines, and any other Federal agency, terminated, effective May 15, 2000, pursuant to section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, as amended, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance. See, also, page 32 of House Document No. 103–7.
Exhibit 23

** **

**KPMG**

Consent ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of DirectorsThe Goldfield Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement (No. 333-72241) on Form S-8 of The Goldfield Corporationof our report dated February 25, 2005, withrespect to the consolidated balance sheets of The Goldfield Corporation andsubsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements ofoperations, cash flows and stockholders' equity for each of the years in thethree-year period ended December 31, 2004,which report appears in the 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K of The GoldfieldCorporation.

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

Orlando, FloridaMarch 29, 2005

 

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         100,344
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                70,521
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    368,986
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     13,121,977
<ALLOWANCE>                                    264,983
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,039,513
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            883,545
<LONG-TERM>                                 11,407,767
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            25
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,748,176
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              14,039,513
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,228,643
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                     0
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             592,858
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          567,798
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   76,800
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                253,754
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                355,344
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   219,026
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     5.8
<LOANS-NON>                                    295,123
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               207,618
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   60,372
<RECOVERIES>                                     3,518
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              264,983
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 25, 2010 

0517 

Order 

 

May 25, 2010 

140698 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140698 

 COA: 289710 

Wayne CC: 08-005817-FC 

WALTER DELVON RAMSEY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 4, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
### SUBCHAPTER XCII—CHICKASAW NATIONAL RECREATION AREA