alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(67 South. 348)

No. 20916.

#### MARTEL v. PETERMAN, Sheriff, et al.

(Jan. 25, 1915.)

*(Syllabus by the Court.)*

Appeal and Errob <S=»150 — Right op Appeal — Parties in Interest.

An appeal will be dismissed where the appellant has no interest in the suit; his interest, as plaintiff, having been seized and sold to the defendant in the cause, and confusion having taken place prior to the time of taking the appeal.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Appeal and Error, Gent. Dig. §§ 934-946; Dec. Dig. <§==> 150.]

Appeal from Twenty-Third Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Mary; T. M. Milling, Judge.

Action by J. Sully Martel against Wilson T. Peterman, sheriff, and others. From an adverse judgment, plaintiff appeals.

Appeal dismissed.

See, also, 66 South. 381.

Edward N. Pugh, of Donaldsonville, for appellant. Emmet Alpha, of Franklin, for appellee E. Robichaux.

On Motion to Dismiss Appeal.

SOMMERVILLE, J.

The interest of plaintiff and appellant in this injunction suit was seized and sold to Eusebe Robichaux, one of the defendants. Robichaux, as substituted plaintiff, moved the court to dissolve the injunction feature of the suit, and it was so ordered. Thereupon Martel, the original plaintiff in the cause, took the appeal now before us for consideration, and Robichaux, the substituted plaintiff in the cause, moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the appellant is without interest in the case, and further that the appeal is frivolous ; and he asks for damages.

The rights of Robichaux, as the substituted plaintiff in the cause, have been recognized by the trial court, and again by this court in the case with the same title, wherein Robi*509chaux made application for a mandamus to compel the district judge to dismiss the main suit on the motion of Robichaux, the substituted plaintiff. The mandamus was made peremptory. 136 La. 14, 66 South. 381.

Only parties in interest are entitled to appeals to appellate courts; and as the rights of Martel, the plaintiff, have been acquired by Robichaux, one of the defendants, he (Martel) had no interest in the suit or the judgment at the time he appealed. Confusion took place when the defendant acquired the rights of the plaintiff in the cause; and it remained only for the suit to be dismissed. The motion of appeal from the judgment setting aside the injunction feature of the suit should not have been allowed.

The court will take cognizance of the judgment heretofore rendered by it between the same parties with reference to the same cause. The main demand has been ordered dismissed, on application of the substituted plaintiff in the cause, and the injunction or auxiliary proceeding fell with it.

The appeal will be dismissed, but without damages, as there is no amount in dispute in the suit.

Appeal dismissed at cost of appellant.

O’NIELL, J., takes no part.
§ 381.108 Exemptions. ( a ) *Filing of petition.* States, municipalities and anyone who is engaged in the official business of the Federal Government are exempt from the fees required by this part and may file a petition for exemption in lieu of the applicable fee.
( b ) *Decision on petition.* A petitioner may claim this exemption by filing an original and two copies of a petition for exemption that includes evidence that the petitioner is a State or municipality, or is engaged in the official business of the Federal Government. The Commission or its designee will analyze each petition to determine whether the petition has met the standards for exemption and will notify the petitioner whether it is granted or denied. If the petition is denied, the person will have thirty days from the date of notification of the denial to submit the appropriate fee to the Commission.
[Order 395, 49 FR 35356, Sept. 7, 1984]
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 6 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 6

 Authorizing the printing of a commemorative document in memory of the 
    late President of the United States, George Herbert Walker Bush.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 28, 2019

   Mr. Blunt (for himself and Ms. Klobuchar) submitted the following 
       concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Authorizing the printing of a commemorative document in memory of the 
    late President of the United States, George Herbert Walker Bush.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. COMMEMORATIVE DOCUMENT AUTHORIZED.

    (a) In General.--A commemorative document in memory of the late 
President of the United States, George Herbert Walker Bush, shall be 
printed as a House document, with illustrations and suitable binding, 
under the direction of the Joint Committee on Printing.
    (b) Contents.--The document shall consist of the eulogies and 
encomiums for George Herbert Walker Bush, as expressed in the Senate 
and the House of Representatives, together with the texts of each of 
the following:
            (1) The state funeral ceremony at the United States Capitol 
        Rotunda.
            (2) The national funeral service held at the Washington 
        National Cathedral, Washington, District of Columbia.
            (3) The memorial service held at St. Martin's Episcopal 
        Church, Houston, Texas.
            (4) The interment ceremony at the George Herbert Walker 
        Bush Presidential Library Center, College Station, Texas.

SEC. 2. PRINTING OF DOCUMENT.

    In addition to the usual number of copies printed, there shall be 
printed the lesser of--
            (1) 32,500 copies of the commemorative document, of which 
        22,150 copies shall be for the use of the House of 
        Representatives and 10,350 copies shall be for the use of the 
        Senate; or
            (2) such number of copies of the commemorative document 
        that does not exceed a production and printing cost of 
        $1,000,000, with distribution of the copies to be allocated in 
        the same proportion as described in paragraph (1).
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 96-40387

Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES EX REL, SHAWN KOVACK,

on behalf of themselves and all 

those similarly situated, and in

the public interest, UNITED STATES

EX REL, KRISTINE STARK, on behalf of

themselves and all those similarly

situated, and in the public interest,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

AT&T,

Defendant-Appellee.

_______________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for

the Southern District of Texas

(C-96-CV-53)

_______________________________________________________

December 6, 1996

Before REAVLEY, JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Shawn Kovack and Christine Stark appeal the district court’s

orders dismissing their complaint and denying reconsideration of

their complaint against AT&T for allegedly overbilling calls from
2

public telephones in excess of published rates, in violation of

47 U.S.C. 151 et seq.

The district court dismissed appellants’ suit with prejudice

when they failed to appear for a pre-trial conference. The

complaint was filed on January 29. On January 30 the court

ordered an initial scheduling conference for February 16, and on

February 6 the conference was reset for February 20. Appellant

Stark told the court that they were instructed by court personnel

to send a letter from their home in Pennsylvania to postpone the

conference. Later, told to file a motion, they did. Thereafter,

appellants say that Kovack was unable to attend the conference

because of being in official custody and Stark had to attend her

seriously injured brother in Washington, D.C. Nevertheless, the

court dismissed the case on February 20. There being no clear

record of delay or contumacious conduct by plaintiffs, dismissal

was an abuse of discretion. See John v. State of Louisiana, 828

F.2d 1129 (5th Cir. 1987).

Judgment vacated, cause remanded.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.48


                  [Letterhead of The Credit Store(Registered)]

February 27, 2001

VIA FACSIMILE & U.S. CERTIFIED MAIL
(605) 948-2198

Steve Hageman, President
Bank of Hoven
202 Main Street
Hoven, South Dakota 67450


                Re: Repurchase Agreement Dated November 30, 2000


Dear Mr. Hageman:

This letter shall memorialize the agreement between Bank of Hoven and The Credit
Store, Inc. to modify the provisions of Section 2.2(a) of the Repurchase
Agreement dated November 30, 2000, between the parties to extend the Option
Period from February 28, 2001 to May 31, 2001 in consideration of the payment of
$10,000 by The Credit Store, Inc. to Bank of Hoven. Please sign the enclosed
copy of this letter to signify your agreement with the above modification.


                            Sincerely Yours,

                            /s/ Michael J. Phillippe
                            -----------------------------
                            Michael J. Phillippe
                            Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

                            BANK OF HOVEN

                            /s/ Steve Hageman, President
                            -----------------------------
                            Steve Hageman, President
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲

▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500
100 18 12 06 00 08/15 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 15 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 85720 / April 25, 2019

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-18207

In the Matter of 

KOLLAGENX CORP.,

MICROLIN BIO, INC.,

VACCINOGEN, INC., and

VIRTUS OIL AND GAS CORP.

NOTICE THAT INITIAL DECISION HAS BECOME FINAL

The time for filing a petition for review of the initial decision in this proceeding has 

expired. No such petition has been filed by KollagenX Corp., Microlin Bio, Inc., Vaccinogen, 

Inc., or Virtus Oil and Gas Corp. and the Commission has not chosen to review the decision on 

its own initiative.

Accordingly, notice is hereby given, pursuant to Rule 360(d) of the Commission's Rules 

of Practice,1that the initial decision of the administrative law judge has become the final 

decision of the Commission with respect to KollagenX Corp., Microlin Bio, Inc., Vaccinogen, 

Inc., and Virtus Oil and Gas Corp.2The order contained in that decision is hereby declared final. 

The initial decision ordered that, pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 

1934, the registrations of each class of registered securities of KollagenX Corp., Microlin Bio, 

Inc., Vaccinogen, Inc., and Virtus Oil and Gas Corp. are hereby revoked. The revocations are

effective as of April 26, 2019.

For the Commission, by the Office of the General Counsel, pursuant to delegated 

authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

 Acting Secretary

 

1

 17 C.F.R. § 201.360(d).

2

 KollagenX Corp., Microlin Bio, Inc., Vaccinogen, Inc., and Virtus Oil and Gas Corp., Initial 

Decision Release No. 1334 (Dec. 14, 2018), 2018 WL 6589828. The Central Index Key 

numbers are: 1402486 for KollagenX Corp.; 1547530 for Microlin Bio, Inc.; 1453001 for 

Vaccinogen, Inc.; and 1478725 for Virtus Oil and Gas Corp.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 85679 / April 17, 2019

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-18179

In the Matter of 

CHINA HEFENG RESCUE EQUIPMENT, INC.,

GREENWORLD DEVELOPMENT, INC.,

MOUNTAIN NATIONAL BANCSHARES, INC., and

UCP HOLDINGS, INC.

NOTICE THAT INITIAL DECISION HAS BECOME FINAL

The time for filing a petition for review of the initial decision in this proceeding has 

expired. No such petition has been filed by China Hefeng Rescue Equipment, Inc., Greenworld 

Development, Inc., Mountain National Bancshares, Inc., or UCP Holdings, Inc., and the 

Commission has not chosen to review the decision on its own initiative.

Accordingly, notice is hereby given, pursuant to Rule 360(d) of the Commission's Rules 

of Practice,1that the initial decision of the administrative law judge has become the final 

decision of the Commission with respect to China Hefeng Rescue Equipment, Inc., Greenworld 

Development, Inc., Mountain National Bancshares, Inc., and UCP Holdings, Inc.2The order 

contained in that decision is hereby declared final. The initial decision ordered that, pursuant to 

Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrations of each class of registered

 

1

 17 C.F.R. § 201.360(d).

2

 China Hefeng Rescue Equip., Inc., Greenworld Dev., Inc., Mountain Nat’l Bancshares, Inc., 

and UCP Holdings, Inc., Initial Decision Release No. 1326 (Dec. 7, 2018), 2018 WL 6433077.

The Central Index Key numbers are: 1506215 for China Hefeng Rescue Equipment, Inc.; 

1084899 for Greenworld Development, Inc.; 1177070 for Mountain National Bancshares, Inc.; 

and 1272906 for UCP Holdings, Inc.
2

securities of China Hefeng Rescue Equipment, Inc., Greenworld Development, Inc., Mountain 

National Bancshares, Inc., and UCP Holdings, Inc., are revoked. The revocation is effective as 

of April 18, 2019.

For the Commission, by the Office of the General Counsel, pursuant to delegated 

authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

 Acting Secretary
§ 54.135 Designation of responsible employee and adoption of grievance procedures. ( a ) *Designation of responsible employee.* Each recipient shall designate at least one employee to coordinate its efforts to comply with and carry out its responsibilities under these Title IX regulations, including any investigation of any complaint communicated to such recipient alleging its noncompliance with these Title IX regulations or alleging any actions that would be prohibited by these Title IX regulations. The recipient shall notify all its students and employees of the name, office address, and telephone number of the employee or employees appointed pursuant to this paragraph.
( b ) *Complaint procedure of recipient.* A recipient shall adopt and publish grievance procedures providing for prompt and equitable resolution of student and employee complaints alleging any action that would be prohibited by these Title IX regulations.
IIA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 34 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale 

to the United Arab Emirates of certain defense articles and services. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 5, 2019 

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. PAUL, Mr. 

LEAHY, Mr. YOUNG, and Mr. REED) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign 

Relations 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the United Arab Emirates of certain 

defense articles and services. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the following proposed foreign military sale to the 

4 United Arab Emirates is prohibited: 

5 (1) The sale of the following defense articles, 

6 including defense services and technical data, de7 scribed in Transmittal No. 17–70, submitted to Con8 gress pursuant to section 36(b) of the Arms Export 

9 Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(b)) and published in 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 34 IS 

1 the Congressional Record on June 4, 2019: The pro2 posed sale of 331 Javelin Guided Missiles with con3 tainer; System Integration and Checkout (SICO) 

4 service; Field Service Representative; United States 

5 Government and contractor technical and logistic 

6 support services’ tools and test equipment; and other 

7 related elements of logistics and program support. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 70 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 70

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
           relative to the voting threshold for impeachment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 13, 2020

 Mr. Scott of Florida introduced the following joint resolution; which 
     was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
           relative to the voting threshold for impeachment.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission by the Congress:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The House of Representatives may only agree to an 
article of impeachment upon the affirmative vote of not less than 
three-fifths of the Members of the House of Representatives, duly 
chosen and sworn.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 54.125 Effect of other requirements. ( a ) *Effect of other Federal provisions.* The obligations imposed by these Title IX regulations are independent of, and do not alter, obligations not to discriminate on the basis of sex imposed by Executive Order 11246, 3 CFR, 1964-1965 Comp., p. 339; as amended by Executive Order 11375, 3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p. 684; as amended by Executive Order 11478, 3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p. 803; as amended by Executive Order 12087, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 230; as amended by Executive Order 12107, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 264; sections 704 and 855 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 295m, 298b-2); Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e *et seq.*); the Equal Pay Act of 1963 (29 U.S.C. 206); and any other Act of Congress or Federal regulation.
( b ) *Effect of State or local law or other requirements.* The obligation to comply with these Title IX regulations is not obviated or alleviated by any State or local law or other requirement that would render any applicant or student ineligible, or limit the eligibility of any applicant or student, on the basis of sex, to practice any occupation or profession.
( c ) *Effect of rules or regulations of private organizations.* The obligation to comply with these Title IX regulations is not obviated or alleviated by any rule or regulation of any organization, club, athletic or other league, or association that would render any applicant or student ineligible to participate or limit the eligibility or participation of any applicant or student, on the basis of sex, in any education program or activity operated by a recipient and that receives Federal financial assistance.
###### Editorial Note on Part 0

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

#### § 0.90 Office of Justice Programs.

The Office of Justice Programs is headed by an Assistant Attorney General appointed by the President. Under the general authority of the Attorney General, the Assistant Attorney General maintains liaison with the provides information to Federal, State, local, and private agencies and organizations on criminal justice matters, and provides staff support to and coordinates the activities of the National Institute of Justice, the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, and the Bureau of Justice Assistance. The Office includes the Office for Victims of Crime.
,<ST"B"\ FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

•"& 301 Fannin Street

v. /Houston, Texas 77002-2066

case&TA3iBOF>3iE*AS

US POSTAGE » PITNEY BOWES Fridday, MairAGE» PITNEY BC

May 08, 2015

RE:

J

Manuel AlcosexlrOr

The State p^feAfisTP

Style:

v.

date of the mandate in all

a sentence of twenty (20)

T. C. Case S

•

<:

2011CR5£u^»

NT. XIE

Ac

3C:

LTY FOR $ 000.34°

NOT

ZIP 77002

02 W

0001372104MAY 08 2015

Please be advised that on this date the mandate was issued in the above cause.

You may obtain a copy of the Court's mandate and all related documents by visiting

the Court's website at www.lstcoa.courts.state.tx.us. Pursuant to Texas Government

Code, Sec. 51.204(b), all exhibits on file with the court, if any, will be destroyed

three years from this date. As required by the Texa3 Government Code, Sec.

51.204 (d) (e), we are also notifying the trial court clerk that we will destroy all

records filed in respect to this case with the exception of indexes, original

opinions, minutes and general.court dockets, no earlier than six (6) year3 from the

cases, twenty-five

or less.

(25) years in criminal cases with

ChristoDher A. Prine. Clerk of

7S7 DC 1 0005/20/15

RETURN TO

DELIVERABLE

UNABLE TO

the Coui

77002206699

SENDER

AS ADDRESSED

F0RWARD

*22S8-00837-09-00

ij.iiii-iiiii>i>i-iiii'i"i'!'iln«i|,M1iiii1il,lliiiiiiii,liiil
.<Sr"'>s. FIRST CODRT OF APPEALS

»/\ 301 Fannin Street

?Houston, Texas 77

•••:,^.;.rx

re: caseSTA^&OFoiiEXAS

Manuel AlcBBWJY I

The State Pf<$fV&TI

ftfSeBUSINESS US POSTAGE»PITNEY BOWES

T.

Style:

C. Case It

<:

11 m

2011CRPC*4^^

N I XI E

NOT

iiiti 0001372104MAY 08 2015

Please be advised that on this date the mandate was issued in the above cause.

You may obtain a copy of the Court's mandate and all related documents by visiting

the Court's website at www.lstcoa.courts.state.tx.us. Pursuant to Texas Government

Code, Sec. 51.204(b), all exhibits on file with the court, if any, will be destroyed

three years from this date. As required by the Texas Government Code. Sec.

51.204(d) (e) , we are also notifying the trial court clerk that we will destroy all

records filed in respect to this case with the exception of indexes, original

opinions, minutes and general.court dockets, no earlier than six (6) years from the

date of the mandate in all *>pl cases, twenty-five (25) years

a sentence of twenty (20)/^£*s or less.

in criminal cases with

ChristoDher A. Prine. Clerk of the Coui

7S7 DC1 0005/20/15

RETURN TO

DELIVERABLE

UNABLE TO

SENDER

AS ADDRESSED

FORWARD

*2288-00837-09-00 3C: 77002206699

ii'iiii'iiiiiii,i,iiii,i,,iii,iiii,ii,,tiiiniiiiii!iiiiiii'iiiii