58606 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 184 / Friday, September 21, 2012 / Notices 

6Section 7 of the Randolph-Sheppard Act, as 

amended (20 U.S.C. 107d–3); 34 CFR 395.8 and 

395.32. 

service, operate, or maintain the 

vending machines.6

Various states have established 

similar programs for persons who are 

blind to operate vending facilities as a 

business on state and local government 

property. Like the Randolph-Sheppard 

Act program, many of these State 

programs provide the blind vendor with 

income from vending machines that are 

located on the same property but are 

operated independently of the blind 

vendor’s vending facility business. 

The income that blind self-employed 

vendors receive under the RandolphSheppard Act (and similar State 

programs) from vending machines that 

are located on the same property, but 

are not serviced, operated, or 

maintained by the blind vendor, is not 

a measure of a blind vendor’s own 

productivity. It does not represent the 

actual value of any part of the blind 

vendor’s work activity. Since the 

income a blind vendor receives under 

this provision of the RandolphSheppard Act (or similar State 

programs) is independent of his or her 

own vending business, and cannot be 

attributed to the blind vendor’s own 

work activity, we will not consider this 

income when we determine whether the 

self-employment work activity is SGA. 

We will deduct this income from the 

blind vendor’s net income before we 

apply the SGA earnings guidelines. 

Cross-References: SSR 83–34 Titles II 

and XVI: Determining Whether Work Is 

Substantial Gainful Activity—SelfEmployed Persons; Program Operations 

Manual System sections DI 10501.015, 

DI 10515.005, and DI 10515.010. 

[FR Doc. 2012–23321 Filed 9–20–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4191–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

[Public Notice 8037] 

U.S. Department of State Advisory 

Committee on Private International 

Law (ACPIL): Notice of Public Meeting 

of the Study Group on Choice of Law 

in International Commercial Contracts 

The Office of the Assistant Legal 

Adviser for Private International Law, 

Department of State, hereby gives notice 

of a public meeting of the Study Group 

on Choice of Law in International 

Commercial Contracts. A working group 

of experts from various countries was 

established by the Hague Conference on 

Private International Law to develop 

non-binding principles relevant to the 

choice of law in international 

commercial contracts. The draft 

principles prepared by that group will 

be considered at a Special Commission 

of the Hague Conference to be held 

November 12–16. If the draft principles 

are approved by the Special 

Commission, it is expected that the 

working group will be requested to 

prepare a detailed commentary to 

accompany the principles. The purpose 

of the public meeting is to obtain the 

views of concerned stakeholders in 

advance of the Special Commission. 

This is not a meeting of the full 

Advisory Committee. The relevant 

documents can be found at the 

following links: 

http://www.hcch.net/upload/wop/ 

gap12pd04e.pdf (Report of the 

Working Group and draft principles); 

http://www.hcch.net/upload/wop/ 

contracts_agenda2012e.pdf (Agenda 

for Special Commission Meeting): and 

http://www.hcch.net/upload/wop/ 

gap2012concl_en.pdf (Conclusions 

and Recommendations of the 

Council). 

Time and Place: The meeting will 

take place on October 19, 2012 from 10 

a.m. to 2 p.m. EDT in Room 240, South 

Building, State Department Annex 4. 

Participants should arrive at the Navy 

Hill gate at the corner of 23rd Street 

NW., and D Street NW., before 9:30 a.m. 

for visitor screening. Persons arriving 

later will need to make arrangements for 

entry using the contact information 

provided below. If you are unable to 

attend the public meeting and would 

like to participate from a remote 

location, teleconferencing will be 

available. 

Public Participation: This meeting is 

open to the public, subject to the 

capacity of the meeting room. Access to 

Navy Hill is strictly controlled. For preclearance purposes, those planning to 

attend in person are requested to email 

or phone Tricia Smeltzer 

(smeltzertk@state.gov, 202–776–8423) or 

Niesha Toms (tomsnn@state.gov, 202– 

776–8420) and provide your full name, 

address, date of birth, citizenship, 

driver’s license or passport number, 

affiliation, and email address. This will 

greatly facilitate entry. Participants will 

be met at the Navy Hill gate at 23rd and 

D Streets NW., and will be escorted to 

the South Building. 

A member of the public needing 

reasonable accommodation should 

advise Ms. Smeltzer or Ms. Toms not 

later than October 12, 2012. Requests 

made after that date will be considered, 

but might not be able to be fulfilled. If 

you would like to participate by 

telephone, please contact Ms. Smeltzer 

or Ms. Toms to obtain the call-in 

number and other information. 

Data from the public is requested 

pursuant to Public Law 99–399 

(Omnibus Diplomatic Security and 

Antiterrorism Act of 1986), as amended; 

Public Law 107–56 (USA PATRIOT 

Act); and Executive Order 13356. The 

purpose of the collection is to validate 

the identity of individuals who enter 

Department facilities. The data will be 

entered into the Visitor Access Control 

System (VACS–D) database. Please see 

the Security Records System of Records 

Notice (State-36) at http:// 

www.state.gov/documents/organization/ 

103419.pdf for additional information. 

Dated: September 11, 2012. 

Michael Dennis, 

Office of Private International Law, Office 

of the Legal Adviser, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 2012–23337 Filed 9–20–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710–08–P 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

[Public Notice 8039] 

Notice of Closed Meeting of the 

Cultural Property Advisory Committee 

There will be a closed meeting of the 

Cultural Property Advisory Committee 

on Thursday, October 25, 2012, and on 

Friday, October 26, 2012, at the 

Department of State, Annex 5, 2201 C 

Street NW., Washington, DC. 

The Committee will conduct interim 

reviews of the Memorandum of 

Understanding Between the Government 

of the United States of America and the 

Government of the Kingdom of 

Cambodia Concerning the Imposition of 

Import Restrictions of Archaeological 

Material from the Kingdom of Cambodia 

from the Bronze Age through the Khmer 

Era, and the Memorandum of 

Understanding Between the Government 

of the United States of America and the 

Government of the People’s Republic of 

China Concerning the Imposition of 

Import Restrictions on Categories of 

Archaeological Material from the 

Paleolithic Period through the Tang 

Dynasty and Monumental Sculpture 

and Wall Art at Least 250 Years Old. 

Public comment, oral and written, will 

be invited at a time in the future should 

these MOUs be proposed for extension. 

The Committee’s responsibilities are 

carried out in accordance with 

provisions of the Convention on 

Cultural Property Implementation Act 

(19 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.). The Act and 

subject Memoranda of Understanding, 

as well as related information, may be 

found at http://exchanges.state.gov/ 

heritage/culprop. This meeting will be 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 184 / Friday, September 21, 2012 / Notices 58607 

closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 

552b(c)(9)(B) and 19 U.S.C. 2605(h), the 

latter of which stipulates that ‘‘The 

provisions of the Federal Advisory 

Committee Act * * * shall apply to the 

[Cultural Property Advisory] Committee 

except that the requirements of 

subsections (a) and (b) of section 10 and 

11 of such Act (relating to open 

meetings, public notice, public 

participation, and public availability of 

documents) shall not apply to the 

Committee, whenever and to the extent 

it is determined by the President or his 

designee that the disclosure of matters 

involved in the Committee’s 

proceedings would compromise the 

Government’s negotiation objectives or 

bargaining positions on the negotiations 

of any agreement authorized by this 

title.’’ 

Dated: September 8, 2012. 

Ann Stock, 

Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational 

and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 2012–23340 Filed 9–20–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710–05–P 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

[Public Notice 8038] 

U.S. Department of State Advisory 

Committee on Private International 

Law (ACPIL)—Online Dispute 

Resolution (ODR) Study Group 

The Office of the Assistant Legal 

Adviser for Private International Law, 

Department of State, hereby gives notice 

that the ACPIL ODR Study Group will 

hold a public meeting. The ACPIL ODR 

Study Group will meet to discuss the 

next session of the UNCITRAL ODR 

Working Group, scheduled for 

November 5–9 in Vienna, and will 

specifically address security issues 

relating to the use of the ODR Rules, 

including measures to address the risk 

of fraud involving consumers who 

participate. This is not a meeting of the 

full Advisory Committee. 

The UNCITRAL ODR Working Group 

is charged with the development of legal 

instruments for resolving both business 

to business and business to consumer 

cross-border electronic commerce 

disputes. The Working Group is in the 

process of developing generic ODR 

procedural rules for resolution of crossborder electronic commerce disputes, 

along with separate legal instruments 

that may take the form of annexes on 

guidelines and minimum requirements 

for online dispute resolution providers 

and arbitrators, substantive legal 

principles for resolving disputes, and a 

cross-border enforcement mechanism. 

One of the key issues that the working 

group is addressing is the identification 

of security issues relating to use of the 

ODR Rules, including measures to 

address the risk of fraud involving 

consumers who participate. 

For the reports of the first four 

sessions of the UNCITRAL ODR 

Working Group—December 13–17, 

2010, in Vienna (A/CN.9/716); May 23– 

27, 2011, in New York (A/CN.9/721); 

Nov. 14–18, 2011, in Vienna (A/CN.9/ 

739) and May 21–25, 2012, in New York 

(A/CN.9/744)—please follow the 

following link: http://www.uncitral.org/ 

uncitral/commission/working_groups/ 

3Online_Dispute_Resolution.html. 

Documents relating to the upcoming 

session of the Working Group should be 

available on the same link in advance of 

the public meeting. 

Time and Place: The meeting will 

take place on Thursday, October 18, 

2012 from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. EDT in Room 

240, South Building (SA–4) (Navy Hill). 

Participants should arrive at Navy Hill 

before 12:30 p.m. for visitor screening. 

Participants will be met at the Navy Hill 

gate at 23rd and D Streets NW., and will 

be escorted to the South Building. 

Persons arriving later will need to make 

arrangements for entry using the contact 

information provided below. If you are 

unable to attend the public meeting and 

would like to participate from a remote 

location, teleconferencing will be 

available. 

Public Participation: This meeting is 

open to the public, subject to the 

capacity of the meeting room. 

Access to Navy Hill is strictly 

controlled. For pre-clearance purposes, 

those planning to attend in person are 

requested to email or phone Tricia 

Smeltzer (smeltzertk@state.gov, 202– 

776–8423) or Niesha Toms 

(tomsnn@state.gov, 202–776–8420) and 

provide your full name, address, date of 

birth, citizenship, driver’s license or 

passport number, affiliation, and email 

address. This will greatly facilitate 

entry. 

A member of the public needing 

reasonable accommodation should 

advise Ms. Smeltzer or Ms. Toms not 

later than October 11. Requests made 

after that date will be considered, but 

might not be able to be fulfilled. If you 

would like to participate by telephone, 

please contact Ms. Smeltzer or Ms. 

Toms to obtain the call-in number and 

other information. 

Data from the public is requested 

pursuant to Public Law 99–399 

(Omnibus Diplomatic Security and 

Antiterrorism Act of 1986), as amended; 

Public Law 107–56 (USA PATRIOT 

Act); and Executive Order 13356. The 

purpose of the collection is to validate 

the identity of individuals who enter 

Department facilities. The data will be 

entered into the Visitor Access Control 

System (VACS–D) database. Please see 

the Security Records System of Records 

Notice (State-36) at http:// 

www.state.gov/documents/organization/ 

103419.pdf for additional information. 

Dated: September 11, 2012. 

Michael J. Dennis, 

Office of Private International Law, Office 

of the Legal Adviser, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 2012–23342 Filed 9–20–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710–08–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Commercial Space 

Transportation Safety Approval 

Performance Criteria 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notification of criteria used to 

evaluate the National Aerospace 

Training and Research (NASTAR) 

Center safety approval application. 

SUMMARY: The FAA issued NASTAR a 

safety approval, subject to the 

provisions of Title 51 U.S.C. Subtitle V, 

ch. 509, and the orders, rules and 

regulations issued under it. Pursuant to 

Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 

CFR) 414.35, this Notice publishes the 

criteria that were used to evaluate the 

safety approval application. 

Background 

NASTAR applied for, and received, a 

safety approval for the ability of its 

Falcon 12/4 Altitude Chamber to 

replicate pressures experienced at 

altitude levels. The performance criteria 

for this safety approval are applicant 

developed per 14 CFR 414.19(a)(4). 

NASTAR’s Falcon 12/4 Altitude 

Chamber is capable of replicating any 

pressure experienced at altitudes from 

zero (0) feet up to 100,000 feet. This 

includes rapid decompression up to 

equalization altitudes of 30,800 feet. 

Criteria Used To Evaluate Safety 

Approval Application 

The Falcon 12/4 Altitude Chamber 

was evaluated by the FAA as a 

component of a flight crew qualification 

and training process. The evaluation 

included the FAA’s assessment of the 

Falcon 12/4 Altitude Chamber’s ability 

to accurately replicate the specified 

pressure levels. 

NASTAR submitted the following 

data to show that the Falcon 12/4 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES