alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### National Drag Racing Enterprise, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*The County of Kendall, *et al.,*Defendants-Appellants.

(No. 70-175;

Second District

October 6, 1971.

*380Dallas C. Ingemunson, State’s Attorney, of Yorkville, for appellant.

Murphy, Griffin and Dixon, of Aurora, for appellee.

Mr. JUSTICE EBERLE

delivered the opinion of the court:

Oral argument of this case was set for June 1st, 1971. On Friday, May 28, 1971, the appellee filed a motion to transfer the cause to the Supreme Court of Illinois on the ground that the appeal raises the constitutionality of sections 6101 and 6102, chapter 34 of the Illinois Revised Statutes; that the issues are constitutional in nature, and that substantial questions under the constitution of the State of Illinois are involved.

June 1st being the next court day, this motion did not come to the attention of the court until the day set for oral argument. At the opening of the court not all counsel were present. The court at that time decided to take the motion to transfer for consideration with the case.

Supreme Court Rule 302, as revised, provides, “Appeals from final Judgments of the circuit courts shall be taken directly to the Supreme Court (1) in cases in which a statute of the United States or of this State has been held invalid * * The final order of the trial court holds that the assessment of a tax, under sections 6101 and 6102 of Chapter 34 of the Illinois Revised Statutes, against the plaintiff-appellee is a discriminatory tax prohibited by the constitution of the State of Illinois and of the United States, thereby declaring this statute invalid and unconstitutional. The issues in this case present the question of the constitutionality of said section 6101 and 6102.

Under Supreme Court Rule 302, the appellee is entitled to a transfer of this cause, under its motion, and the case is ordered transferred to the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois.

Cause transferred.

MORAN, P. J., and ABRAHAMSON, J., concur.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ARROW FREIGHT MANAGEMENT, INC

. ,

Appellant,

v.

RUBEN CONTRERAS

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 23

- 00082

- CV

Appeal from the

384th Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2022

- DCV

- 0305 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellees

recover from Appe llant all costs of appeal for which let execution issue. This decision shall be

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 12TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024.

G INA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ

.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1
 
                             CAMBRIDGE HEART, INC.
 
                       COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            For the Year Ended December 31,
                                          -------------------------------------
                                             1996         1997         1998
                                          -----------  -----------  -----------
<S>                                       <C>          <C>          <C>
Net loss................................. $(4,034,879) $(6,047,619) $(6,537,085)
Weighted average shares outstanding:
 Shares attributable to common stock
  outstanding............................   6,073,865   10,451,560   10,748,508
                                          -----------  -----------  -----------
Net loss per share--basic and diluted.... $     (0.66) $     (0.58) $     (0.61)
                                          ===========  ===========  ===========
</TABLE>
 
  Potential common stock, including options, warrants and convertible preferred
stock, have been excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share,
as their effect would be anti-dilutive.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF DECEMER 31, 1997 AND THE STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31,1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000055387
<NAME> KENTUCKY UTILITIES COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,483,352
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     12,807
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         137,193
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        46,528
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,679,880
<COMMON>                                       308,140
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                         (595)
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            304,750
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 612,295
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     40,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           546,351
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              33,600
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                       21
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 447,613
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                1,679,880
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      716,437
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            51,690
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     546,339
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     598,029
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        118,408
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               7,003
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 125,411
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        39,698
<NET-INCOME>                                    85,713
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      2,256
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   83,457
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        66,559
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       37,405
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         178,906
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>ALL OUTSTANDING COMMON STOCK OF KENTUCKY UTILITIES COMPANY IS HELD BY ITS
PARENT COMPANY, KU ENERGY CORPORATION.  THEREFORE, EARNINGS PER SHARE IS NOT
APPLICABLE.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned, Allen G. Sugerman, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of
The MIIX Group, Incorporated (the "Company"), has executed this certification in
connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the
"Report").

The undersigned hereby certifies that to the best of his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
14th day of August, 2003.


                                         /s/ Allen G. Sugerman
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
                                         August 14, 2003
#### Darryl Evans et al., Appellants, v Charles Murphy et al., Respondents.

[823 NYS2d 348]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Solomon, J.), dated November 5, 2004, which, after an in camera inspection of the records of the Internal Affairs *418Bureau of the New York City Police Department, denied that branch of their motion which was to compel the defendants to disclose those records.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof denying that branch of the motion which was to compel production of a three-page investigative report in the records of the Internal Affairs Bureau of the New York City Police Department, and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the motion after the redaction of the names of any witnesses; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs to the plaintiffs.

After an in camera inspection of the file of the Internal Affairs Bureau of the New York City Police Department (hereinafter IAB) with respect to the subject incident, the Supreme Court directed that the file “shall not be produced.” The Supreme Court should have directed the defendants to produce the three-page investigative report in the IAB file, after the redaction of the names of any witnesses, because the report contains information which is material and relevant to the plaintiffs’ action *(see Pickering v State of New York,*30 AD3d 393 [2006]; *Spadaro v Balesteri,*237 AD2d 507 [1997]).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. Miller, J.P, Santucci, Goldstein, Skelos and Lunn, JJ., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Inicio 
-  Made In America Waivers 

## Section navigation

-  Ubicaciones de la SBA 
-  Gobierno transparente    -  Ley de Libertad de Información 
  -  Digital SBA 
  -  Sobre el sitio web SBA.gov 
  -  La Ley de Privacidad 
  -  Guía de solicitud bajo la Ley de Privacidad 
  -  Calidad de la información 
  -  SBA guidance 
  -  Inventario de inteligencia artificial 
  -  Made in America waivers 
-  SBA Newsroom 
-  Work for SBA 
-  Organización 
-  Oversight and advocacy 
-  Information in other languages 

Parte o todo el contenido en esta página disponible solo en inglés.

# Made in America waivers

----

## Contenido

----

The *Build America, Buy America Act* (Pub. L. No. 117-58, §§ 70901-52) was created to bolster America’s industrial base, protect national security, and support high-paying jobs. It ensures that funds are not allocated for any federal financial assistance program for infrastructure unless the project uses American materials.

In some situations, agencies can issue waivers for exceptions to the Made in America Laws. Agencies must post waivers and detailed explanations online, allowing at least 15 days for public comment.

You can find more information about these policies and the waivers proposed by federal agencies at madeinamerica.gov.

### Current SBA waivers

SBA does not have any waivers.

If you are a current SBA grantee and you wish to request a waiver of the Buy America requirements, please contact your SBA program office.
Exhibit 21





                Hannaford Bros. Co. Parents and Subsidiaries

                                                                Percentage
                                                                of Voting 
                                                 State          Securities
                                                   of           Owned by the
     Registrant                              Incorporation       Registrant 

Hannaford Bros. Co.                               Maine

     Subsidiaries (1)

Athenian Real Estate Development, Inc.          Virginia          100.00%
Boney Wilson & Sons, Inc.                    North Carolina       100.00%
Hannaford Licensing Corp.                         Maine           100.00%
Hannaford Procurement Corp.                       Maine           100.00%
Hannaford Trucking Company                        Maine           100.00%
HHR, Inc.                                    Massachusetts        100.00%
Martin's Foods of South Burlington, Inc.         Vermont          100.00%
Plain Street Properties, Inc.                     Maine           100.00%
Progressive Distributors, Inc.                    Maine           100.00%
Shop 'n Save-Mass., Inc.                     Massachusetts        100.00%


     (1)  Each of the subsidiaries is included in the consolidated financial
statements of the Registrant.
### §1421d. Unusual mortality event activity funding

#### (a) Establishment of Fund

There is established in the Treasury an interest bearing fund to be known as the "Marine Mammal Unusual Mortality Event Fund", which shall consist of amounts deposited into the Fund under subsection (c).

#### (b) Uses

Amounts in the Fund shall be available only for use by the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior, and dispersed among claimants based on budgets approved by the Secretary prior to expenditure—

(1) to make advance, partial, or progress payments under contracts or other funding mechanisms for property, supplies, salaries, services, and travel costs incurred in acting in accordance with the contingency plan issued under section 1421c(b) of this title or under the direction of an Onsite Coordinator for an unusual mortality event designated under section 1421c(a)(2)(B)(iii) of this title;

(2) for reimbursing any stranding network participant for costs incurred in the collection, preparation, analysis, and transportation of marine mammal tissues and samples collected with respect to an unusual mortality event for the Tissue Bank; and

(3) for the care and maintenance of a marine mammal seized under section 1374(c)(2)(D) of this title; and 1

#### (c) Deposits into Fund

There shall be deposited into the Fund—

(1) amounts appropriated to the Fund;

(2) other amounts appropriated to the Secretary for use with respect to unusual mortality events; and

(3) amounts received by the United States in the form of gifts, devises, and bequests under subsection (d).

#### (d) Acceptance of donations

For purposes of carrying out this subchapter and section 1374(c)(2)(D) of this title, the Secretary may accept, solicit, and use the services of volunteers, and may accept, solicit, receive, hold, administer, and use gifts, devises, and bequests.

(Pub. L. 92–522, title IV, §405, formerly title III, §305, as added Pub. L. 102–587, title III, §3003(a), Nov. 4, 1992, 106 Stat. 5064; renumbered title IV, §405, and amended Pub. L. 103–238, §§6, 16(b), 24(b), (c)(2), Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 542, 559, 565, 566; Pub. L. 117–263, div. J, title CIV, §10403, Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3983.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 117–263 amended subsec. (b) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (b) related to uses of amounts in the Marine Mammal Unusual Mortality Event Fund and payment of pending claims.

1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–238, §16(b), substituted "an interest bearing fund" for "a fund".

Subsec. (b)(1)(A)(i). Pub. L. 103–238, §24(c)(2), made technical amendment to reference to section 1421c(b) of this title to reflect renumbering of corresponding section of original act.

Subsec. (b)(1)(A)(iii). Pub. L. 103–238, §6(1), added cl. (iii).

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 103–238, §6(2), inserted "and section 1374(c)(2)(D) of this title".

1 So in original. The "; and" probably should be a period.
### SUBCHAPTER LIX–Q—TUMACACORI NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK
Exhibit 99

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Investors Insurance Group, Inc.(the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Donald F. U. Goebert, Chief Executive Officer  and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
   of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



May 13, 2003                                /s/ Donald F. U. Goebert
                                          ----------------------------
                                            Donald F. U. Goebert
                                            Acting President, Chief Executive
                                            Officer and Chief Financial Officer
145


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.16

                              NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE

APPLICANT: Fu- Lin, ZHOU

The application submitted on August 20, 1995 to obtain patent of invention named
'RUBBER SHOCK ABSORBER CUSHION' satisfies requirements of patent application.
According to section twenty-eight of the Patent Act and section thirty-nine in
Details and Regulations of the Patent Act, this application has been accepted.
The application number and application date are assigned as followings:

APPLICATION NUMBER  :           95 2 20019.7
APPLICATION DATE    :           950820

FEE : 1 - 80% Reduced

Explanation in Brief:

This notice is a proof indicating that the Department of Patent of China has
accepted the applicant's application for a patent.

The Application number is the file number assigned by the Department of Patent
of China. Nine digits or characters compose the application number. The third
digit counting from the left represents the type of the application. Digit "1"
stands for invention; Digit "2" stands for practical new model type; Digit
"3"stands for apparent design. If the applicant finds that the application
number does not correctly stands for his/her application type, he/she should ask
the Department of Patent to make correction within 15 days from the date when
this notice is received by the applicant.

According to the twenty-eighth regulation stated in the Patent Act, if the
application is submitted by mail, the date of the postmark on the application
documents is assigned as the application date. If the applicant finds the
application date assigned different from the mailing date, he/ she can ask the
Department of Patent to change the application date provided with proof of the
mail register within one month from the date when this notice is received by the
applicant.

This notice has very important instructions printed on the back. It is the
applicants' responsibilities to read those instructions carefully.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 27 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 27

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That the Architect of the Capitol is authorized and directed to 
transfer the catafalque which is situated in the Exhibition Hall of the 
Capitol Visitor Center to the House wing of the Capitol so that such 
catafalque may be used in connection with services to be conducted 
there for the Honorable Elijah E. Cummings, late a Representative from 
the State of Maryland.

            Passed the Senate October 21, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            S. CON. RES. 27

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for the use of the catafalque situated in the Exhibition Hall 
 of the Capitol Visitor Center in connection with memorial services to 
be conducted in the House wing of the Capitol for the Honorable Elijah 
     E. Cummings, late a Representative from the State of Maryland.
```
§ 2.2 Eligibility for parole; adult sentences. ( a ) A Federal prisoner serving a maximum term or terms of more than one year imposed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4205 (a) (or pursuant to former 18 U.S.C. 4202) may be released on parole in the discretion of the Commission after completion of one-third of such term or terms, or after completion of ten years of a life sentence or of a sentence of over thirty years.
( b ) A Federal prisoner serving a maximum term or terms of more than one year imposed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4205(b)(1) (or pursuant to former 18 U.S.C. 4208(a)(1)) may be released on parole in the discretion of the Commission after completion of the court-designated minimum term, which may be less than but not more than one-third of the maximum sentence imposed.
( c ) A Federal prisoner serving a maximum term or terms of more than one year imposed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4205(b)(2) (or pursuant to former 18 U.S.C. 4208(a)(2)) may be released on parole at any time in the discretion of the Commission.
( d ) If the Court has imposed a maximum term or terms of more than one year pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 924(a) or 26 U.S.C. 5871 [violation of Federal gun control laws], a Federal prisoner serving such term or terms may be released in the discretion of the Commission as if sentenced pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4205(b)(2). However, if the prisoner's offense was committed on or after October 12, 1984, and the Court imposes a term or terms under 26 U.S.C. 5871, the prisoner is eligible for parole only after service of one-third of such term or terms, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4205(a).
( e ) A Federal prisoner serving a maximum term or terms of one year or less is not eligible for parole consideration by the Commission.
[42 FR 41408, Aug. 17, 1977, as amended at 50 FR 36423, Sept. 6, 1985; 53 FR 46870, Nov. 21, 1988]
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT CHRISTOPHER O. SMITH, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-5333 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed February 13, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; J. Kevin Abdoney and Glenn T. Shelby, Judges. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Joanna Beth Conner, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and MORRIS and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 53 (Friday, March 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 14949]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6548]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, March 23, 2011; 2 p.m.-3 p.m.

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS: Closed to the Public.

Matter To Be Considered: 

Compliance Status Report

    The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of 
compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: March 15, 2011.
Todd A Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-6548 Filed 3-16-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P