alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

As registered independent public
accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report, dated March 28, 2008, included in this Form 10-K/A, into the Companys previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-12411, 333-93201,
333-72648, 333-85246, 333-108167, 333-114304, 333-135972, 333-143980, 333-150202 and 333-150203) and the Companys previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-143091, 333-121915 and 333-106033).



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ Vitale, Caturano & Company, Ltd.
|                                    
|VITALE, CATURANO & COMPANY, LTD.    
|                                    
|Boston, Massachusetts               
|April 14, 2008
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Presidio Trust

# AGENCY:

The Presidio Trust.

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with § 103(c)(6) of the Presidio Trust Act, 16 U.S.C. 460bb appendix, and in accordance with the Presidio Trust's bylaws, notice is hereby given that a public meeting of the Presidio Trust Board of Directors will be held commencing 6:30 p.m. on Monday, February 7, 2011, at the Golden Gate Club, 135 Fisher Loop, Presidio of San Francisco, California. The Presidio Trust was created by Congress in 1996 to manage approximately eighty percent of the former U.S. Army base known as the Presidio, in San Francisco, California.

The purposes of this meeting are to approve minutes of a previous Board meeting, to provide the Chairperson's report, to provide the Executive Director's report, to provide project updates, and to receive public comment on other matters in accordance with the Trust's Public Outreach Policy.

Individuals requiring special accommodation at this meeting, such as needing a sign language interpreter, should contact Mollie Matull at 415.561.5300 prior to January 31, 2011.

*Time:*                         The meeting will begin at 6:30 p.m. on Monday, February 7, 2011.                    

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Golden Gate Club, 135 Fisher Loop, Presidio of San Francisco.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Karen Cook, General Counsel, the Presidio Trust, 34 Graham Street, P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, California 94129-0052, Telephone: 415.561.5300.

Dated: January 5, 2011.

Karen A. Cook,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2011-660 Filed 1-12-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-4R-P
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

REORGANIZED RFS CORPORATION &

SUBSIDIARIES, FOR IT SELF AND AS SUBSTITUTE AGENT FOR RELIANCE GROUP HOLDING, INC. & SUBS IDIARIES, Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant

- Appellee.

______________________

2014

- 5052

______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:09

- cv

- 00371

- TCW, Judge Thomas C. Wheeler.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R
The parties submit a joint stipulation to dismiss the above

- captioned appeal pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b), which the court treats as a motion to withdraw the appeal. Case: 14-5052 Document: 14 Page: 1 Filed: 09/03/2014REORGANIZED RFS v. US 2

Upon consideration thereof,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The motion to withdraw the appeal is granted. The appeal is dismissed.
(2 ) Each party shall bear its own costs.

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s21

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: September 3, 2014 Case: 14-5052 Document: 14 Page: 2 Filed: 09/03/2014
###### Editorial Note on Part 0

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

#### § 0.116 Board of Immigration Appeals.

The membership of the Board of Immigration Appeals shall be established in accordance with 8 CFR 1003.1. The Chairman of the Board of Immigration Appeals, who shall also be known as the Chief Appellate Immigration Judge, shall be responsible for providing supervision and establishing internal operating procedures of the Board in the exercise of its authorities and responsibilities as delineated in 8 CFR 1003.1 through 1003.8.

[AG Order No. 4515-2019, 84 FR 44542, Aug. 26, 2019]
CS 315822-Q 04/30/2020

cdc.gov/coronavirus

တၢ်် �အမံၤၤ�10 လၢၢ နမၤၤအီၤၤ�သ့့လၢၢ နကပၢၢဆှၢၢကွၢ််�ထွဲ�ဲန

COVID-19 တၢ်် �ဆါါပနီၣ်�်တဖၣ််

�ဖဲဲဟံၣ််��

ဖဲဲနမ့ၢ််��အိၣ််��ဒီးး� မ့့တမ့ၢ််�� ပာ််�ဂၢၢ်�်�ပာ််�ကျၢၤ�ၤ�လၢၢနအိၣ််��ဒီးး� COVID-19

6. မၤၤဘၢၢနတၢ်် �ကူးး� ဒီးး� တၢ်် �ကဆဲဲတ ဖၣ််�.

2. သမံံသမိးး�နတၢ်် �ဆါါပနီၣ်�်တဖၣ််�

လီၤၤ�တံၢ််� �လီၤၤ�ဆဲးး�တက့ၢ််� �. နတၢ််ဆါ� ါပနီၣ်�်တဖၣ််�မ့ၢ််� �

နးးထီၣ််��န့ၣ်�်ကိးး�နပှၤၤ�ဟ့ၣ််��တၢ််�အိၣ််��ဆူၣ််�� အိၣ််��ချ့့�

တၢ််ကွၢ်� ်� �ထွဲဲတၢ်် မၤၤ� စၢၤ�ၤတဘျီီဃီီတက့ၢ််� �.

4. နမ့ၢ််� �အိၣ််��ဒီးး�ကသံၣ််��ကသီီတၢ််သ့ၣ်� ်��ဆၢၢဖးးက

တီၢ််� �န့ၣ်�်က ကိးး�ဆိိန ပှၤၤ� ဟ့ၣ််��တၢ်် �အိၣ််��

ဆူၣ််��အိၣ််��ချ့့�တၢ်် �မၤၤစၢၤၤဒီးး� တဲဲဘၣ်် �အဝဲဲ

သ့ၣ််�� လၢၢနအိၣ််��ဒီးး� မ့့တမ့ၢ််� � ဘၣ််�သ့ၣ််��သ့ၣ််��

အိၣ််��ဒီးး� COVID-19 န့ၣ်�်တက့ၢ််� �.

7. သ့့နစုုတဖၣ််�ခဲဲအံၤ ၤ�ခဲဲအံၤ ၤ� ဒီးး�ဆးးပၠၣ််��ဒီးး�ထံံအစှၤၤ�က

တၢၢ််� � 20 စဲးး�ကီးး� မ့့တမ့ၢ််� � မၤၤကဆှဲဲကဆှီီ နစုုတဖၣ််�ဒီးး�တၢ််�

မၤၤက ဆှီီစုုလၢၢ အမၤၤသံံတၢ််ဃူးး � �တၢ််ဃၢ်် � လၢၢအပၣ်် � �ဒီးး�သံးး�

စီီထံံအစှၤၤ� ကတၢၢ််� � 60% တက့ၢ််� �.

8. တသ့့ဖဲဲအသ့့ , အိၣ််��လၢၢဒၢး�းလီၤၤ�ဆီီအပူၤၤ�ဒီးး�အိၣ််��

ယံၤၤ�ဒီးး�ပှၤၤ�ဂၤၤ လၢၢနဟံၣ််��အပူၤၤ�တက့ၢ််� �. ဒ််န့ၣ်�်အသိးး�,

နကြၢးး�စူးး�ကါါတၢ််လုၢ်် � � �ထံံဒၢး�းလီၤၤ�ဆီီ, ဖဲဲမ့ၢ််� �သ့့မ့ၢ််� �အိၣ််�� 

အခါါန့ၣ်�်လီၤၤ�. နမ့ၢ််� �လိၣ််��အိၣ််��လၢၢပှၤၤ�ဂၤၤအကပိာ််��ကပၤၤ

လၢၢဟံၣ််�� မ့့တမ့ၢ််� � ဟံၣ််��အချၢၢ�န့ၣ်�်, ထီီဃာ််�နီၣ်�်ကျၢၢ််�� �ဘၢၢ

မဲာ််��တက့ၢ််� �.

1. အိၣ််��ဖဲဲဟံၣ််��လၢၢဟံၣ််��ဒီးး�ကၠိိ. ဒီးး�အိၣ််��ယံၤၤ�ဒီးး�ပှၤၤ�ဂၤၤ

လၢၢကမျၢၢ််� �တၢ််လီၢ်် � � �တၢ််ကျဲဲအ � ကျဲဲအဂၤၤတဖၣ််� နမ့ၢ််� �ဘၣ််�

ဟးးထီၣ််��လၢၢတၢ််ချၢၢ � �န့ၣ်�်ဟးးဆှဲးး� တၢ််စူးး��ကါါ ကမျၢၢ််� �

ဝံံစိာ််��တီီဆှၢၢ� တၢ််လဲၤၤ� လဲၤၤ�တၢ််က့ၤၤ � �, ဒိးး�သကိးး�သိိလ့ၣ််�� 

မ့့တမ့ၢ််� � သိိလ့ၣ််��ဒိးး�လဲဲတ ဖၣ််�.

9. ဟးးဆှဲးး��စူးး�ကါါသကိးး�နီၢ််�ကစၢ်် �တၢ်် �ဖိိတၢ်် �လံၤၤ�

တဖၣ််�ဒီးး�ပှၤၤ�ဂၤၤ လၢၢနဟံၣ််��အပူၤၤ� ဒ််အမ့ၢ််� �, လီီခီီ,

တၢ််ကံးး � �ညာ််�ထွါါသးးတဖၣ််�, ဒီးး�လီၢ််� �မံံလီၢ််� �ဒါါတက့ၢ််� �. 

3. ဟံးး�န့ၢ််�တၢ်် �အိၣ််��ဘှံးး�အိၣ််��သါါဒီးး�အီီတၢ်် �

ထံံတၢ်် �နိိအါါအါါတက့ၢ််.�

10. မၤၤကဆှီီတၢ်် �အမဲာ််��ဖံးး�ခိၣ််��ခဲဲလၢာ် ်��လၢၢတၢ််ဖီၣ််� ��

ဘူးး�ထိးး�ဘူးး�အီၤၤ�ခဲဲအံၤၤ �ခဲဲအံၤၤ �, ဒ််အမ့ၢ််� � ခးးဖးးထီီ, စီၢ််� �နီၤၤ�

ခိၣ််��အဖီီခိၣ််��တဖၣ််�, ဒီးး�ပဲဲတြီီအစုုကမိာ််��တဖၣ််�န့ၣ်�်တ

က့ၢ််� �. စူးး�ကါါဟံၣ််��ဃီီတၢ််မၤၤကဆှဲဲကဆှီီပီးး � မၤၤကဆှဲဲကဆှီီပီးး �လီီကသံၣ််��

ပြိိတဖၣ််� မ့့တမ့ၢ််� � တၢ််ထွါါတ� ဖၣ််�ဒ််ပနံာ််��မံၤၤ�ပနီၣ်�်တၢ််�

နဲၣ်�နဲၣ် ်ကျဲဲပာ်် �ဖျါါအသိးး�န့ၣ်�်တက့ၢ််� �. 

5. လၢၢကသံၣ််��ကသီီဂ့ၢ််� �ဂီၢ််� �အူူတဖၣ််�အဂီၢ််� � ကိးး� 

911 ဒီးး� ဘိးး�ဘၣ််�သ့ၣ််��ညါါ ပဒိၣ်�်ပှၤၤ�ဟ့ၣ််��

တၢ််ကစီၣ်် � ��ပှၤၤ�ဘၣ််�မူူဘၣ််�ဒါါ လၢၢနအိၣ််��ဒီးး� မ့့

တမ့ၢ််� � ဘၣ််�သ့ၣ််��သ့ၣ််��အိၣ််��ဒီးး� န့ၣ်�်တက့ၢ််� �.
#### The Chicago and Alton Railroad Company *v.*Milam M. Engle.

1. *Obdutancb—publication, how proved—evidence.*'Where the charter of a town provided that “no ordinance shall be of any force until the same shall have been advertised, by publishing copies in three public places in said town for ten days,” but contains no provision as to how proof of publication shall be made, it must be proved as at common law. The certificate of the town clerk of the due publication of an ordinance, as required by law, is not admissible to prove publication.

2. In a suit against a railway company, to recover for the killing of an animal within the limits of an incorporated town, On the ground of an alleged violation of an ordinance of the town by the company, in running its train at a prohibited rate of speed, it is indispensable to a recovery that the plaintiff should prove that the ordinance was in force at the time of the alleged accident.

*318Appeal from the Circuit Court of Menard *county;*the Hon. Lyman Lacey, Judge, presiding.

Tin's was an action on the case, by Milam M. Engle against the Chicago and Alton Railroad Company, to recover damages for the killing of plaintiff’s horse in the incorporated town of Greenview, by one of defendant’s trains of cars. The ground of recovery, alleged in the declaration, was the running of the train at a greater rate of speed than six miles an hour through the town, in violation of an ordinance of said town. The plaintiff recovered judgment fpr §244.335, and defendant appealed.

Mr. N. W. Branson, for the appellant.

Messrs. Morrison & Whitlock, for the appellee.

Mr. Justice McAllister

delivered the opinion of the Court:

In order to a recovery under his declaration, it was indispensable that appellee should have shown the ordinance of the town of Greenview to have been in force at the time of the alleged killing of his horse by appellant’s train. The act incorporating the town provides, that “no ordinance shall be of any force until the same shall have been advertised, by publishing copies in three public places in said town for ten days,” but contains no provision as to how proof of publication shall he made. In the absence of any such provision, common law evidence of the fact of posting copies in three public places should ha%-e been adduced.

The court below permitted the ordinance to be read in evidence, against the defendant’s objection, upon the mere certificate of the town clerk that it had been “published on the 19th day of June, A. D. 1868, by posting up three copies as required by law.” There being no statute making such certificate evidence of the fact of publication, it was incompe- . tent, and the ordinance not admissible in evidence, or, if it *319was, no force could be attributed to it, until the fact of publication, as required by the charter, was shown by competent evidence.

The judgment will be reversed, and the cause remanded.

*Judgment reversed.*
#### In the Matter of Rene A., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 707]

Appeal from order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Alma Cordova, J.), entered on or about August 4, 2005, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon his admission that he had committed an act, which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of trespass in the third degree, and placed him with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of up to 12 months, unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs.

Appellant’s challenge to the court’s dispositional order is moot, since he has already completed his placement *(see Matter of Yuan Tung C.,*296 AD2d 323 [2002]). Were we not dismissing the appeal, we would find that the placement was a proper exercise of discretion *(see*Family Ct Act § 352.2 [2] [a]). Concur—Tom, J.E, Mazzarelli, Andrias, Sweeny and Malone, JJ.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Marcel de Groot, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Luna Gold Corp.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the registrant and we have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated this 18th day of November, 2003.



| | /s/ Marcel de Groot
Marcel de Groot
Principal Financial Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------





---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 857 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 857

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the amount of 
 special pension for Medal of Honor recipients, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 25, 2019

Mr. Cotton (for himself and Mr. Graham) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the amount of 
 special pension for Medal of Honor recipients, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN SPECIAL PENSION FOR MEDAL OF HONOR RECIPIENTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1562(a) of title 38, United States Code, 
is amended by striking ``$1,000'' and inserting ``$3,000''.
    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
        take effect on the date that is--
                    (A) except as provided in subparagraph (B), 180 
                days after the date of the enactment of this Act; and
                    (B) in the case that the date that is 180 days 
                after the date of the enactment of this Act is not the 
                first day of a month, the first day of the first month 
                beginning after the date that is 180 days after the 
                date of the enactment of this Act.
            (2) Delay of annual cost-of-living adjustment.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs 
                shall not make an increase pursuant to section 1562(e) 
                of such title effective December 1, 2019, if the 
                amendment made by subsection (a) takes effect before 
                such date.
                    (B) Resumption.--In the case that the Secretary, 
                pursuant to subparagraph (A), does not make an increase 
                pursuant to section 1562(e) of such title effective 
                December 1, 2019, the Secretary shall resume making 
                increases pursuant to such section with the first such 
                increase effective December 1, 2020.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                             8,198
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                           48,616
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                             48,616
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  57,911
<CASH>                                           4,728
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             395,859
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          37,447
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 509,839
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                      7
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  10,385
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          450,649
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  8,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,420
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,871)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   509,839
<PREMIUMS>                                       1,030
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              4,730
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 533
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   3,026
<BENEFITS>                                         401
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             4,644
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    772
<INCOME-TAX>                                       204
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                976
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       976
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Annual Report of Golden Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended June 3,
2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patty Townsend, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: August 18, 2016



|/s/ Patty Townsend                         | 
|------------------------------------------ | 
|Patty Townsend                             | 
|Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer | 



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Golden Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Golden Enterprises, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

IN RE GERALD M. BENS ON AND KENNETH L. SMITH

______________________

2012

- 1663

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 09/515,978.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

IN RE GERALD M. BENSON AND KENNETH L. SMITH

______________________

2012

- 1664

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 11/061,327.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

S ANDRA K. N OVAK , 3M Innovative Properties Comp any, of St. Paul, Minnesota, argued for appellant s

.M ARY L. K ELLY

, Associates Solicitor, Office of the S olicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. Wit h h er on the brief were R AYMOND T. C HEN , Solicitor, and B RIAN T.

R ACILLA , Associate Solicitor.

______________________

T HESE C AUSE S having been heard and considered, they

are

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (D YK

, P ROST

, and R EYNA

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

June 6, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk
### §403c–2. Repealed. June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §39, 62 Stat. 992, eff. Sept. 1, 1948

Section, act Aug. 19, 1937, ch. 703, §2, 50 Stat. 701, related to inclusion of park in judicial district. See section 127 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 44 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed retransfer of certain defense articles from the United Arab 

Emirates to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the issuance of an export license with respect to the 

4 following proposed retransfer of defense articles from the 

5 United Arab Emirates to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jor6 dan is prohibited: 

7 (1) The retransfer of the following defense arti8 cles, including services and technical data, described 

9 in Executive Communication 1428 (EC–1428) sub10 mitted to Congress pursuant to section 3(d) of the 

11 Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2753(d)) and 

12 published in the Congressional Record on June 3, 

13 2019: The proposed retransfer of 500 Paveway II 

14 laser guided bombs (including Mk–82 warheads, 
2 

†SJ 44 ES 

1 FMU–152A/B fuzes, and guidance kits) from the 

2 United Arab Emirates to Jordan. 

Passed the Senate June 20, 2019. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 44 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proKingdom of Jordan. the United Arab Emirates to the Hashemite posed retransfer of certain defense articles from