alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 50.12 Exchange of FBI identification records. ( a ) The Federal Bureau of Investigation, hereinafter referred to as the FBI, is authorized to expend funds for the exchange of identification records with officials of federally chartered or insured banking institutions to promote or maintain the security of those institutions and, if authorized by state statute and approved by the Director of the FBI, acting on behalf of the Attorney General, with officials of state and local governments for purposes of employment and licensing, pursuant to section 201 of Public Law 92-544, 86 Stat. 1115. Also, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 78q, 7 U.S.C. 21 (b)(4)(E), and 42 U.S.C. 2169, respectively, such records can be exchanged with certain segments of the securities industry, with registered futures associations, and with nuclear power plants. The records also may be exchanged in other instances as authorized by federal law.
( b ) The FBI Director is authorized by 28 CFR 0.85(j) to approve procedures relating to the exchange of identification records. Under this authority, effective September 6, 1990, the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Division has made all data on identification records available for such purposes. Records obtained under this authority may be used solely for the purpose requested and cannot be disseminated outside the receiving departments, related agencies, or other authorized entities. Officials at the governmental institutions and other entities authorized to submit fingerprints and receive FBI identification records under this authority must notify the individuals fingerprinted that the fingerprints will be used to check the criminal history records of the FBI. The officials making the determination of suitability for licensing or employment shall provide the applicants the opportunity to complete, or challenge the accuracy of, the information contained in the FBI identification record. These officials also must advise the applicants that procedures for obtaining a change, correction, or updating of an FBI identification record are set forth in 28 CFR 16.34. Officials making such determinations should not deny the license or employment based on information in the record until the applicant has been afforded a reasonable time to correct or complete the record, or has declined to do so. A statement incorporating these use-and-challenge requirements will be placed on all records disseminated under this program. This policy is intended to ensure that all relevant criminal record information is made available to provide for the public safety and, further, to protect the interests of the prospective employee/licensee who may be affected by the information or lack of information in an identification record.
[Order No. 2258-99, 64 FR 52229, Sept. 28, 1999]
### §3401. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–127, title III, §336(f)(1), Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1007

Section, Pub. L. 97–98, title XV, §1501, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1328, reaffirmed congressional policy regarding soil and water conservation.
#### § 42.305 Recordkeeping and certification.

The equal employment opportunity program and all records used in its preparation shall be kept on file and retained by each recipient covered by these guidelines for subsequent audit or review by responsible personnel of the cognizant State planning agency or the LEAA. Prior to the authorization to fund new or continuing programs under the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, the recipient shall file a certificate with the cognizant State planning agency or with the LEAA Office of Civil Rights Compliance stating that the equal employment opportunity program is on file with the recipient. This form of the certification shall be as follows:

I, _____ (person filing the application) certify that the _____ (criminal justice agency) has formulated an equal employment program in accordance with 28 CFR 42.301, *et seq.,* subpart E, and that it is on file in the Office of _____ (name), _____ (address), _____ (title), for review or audit by officials of the cognizant State planning agency or the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration as required by relevant laws and regulations.

The criminal justice agency created by the Governor to implement the Safe Streets Act within each State shall certify that it requires, as a condition of the receipt of block grant funds, that recipients from it have executed an Equal Employment Opportunity Program in accordance with this subpart, or that, in conformity with the terms and conditions of this regulation no equal employment opportunity programs are required to be filed by that jurisdiction.
### §2512. Leave policies for the Coast Guard

(a) In General.—Except as provided in subsection (b), not later than 1 year after the date on which the Secretary of the Navy promulgates a new rule, policy, or memorandum pursuant to section 704 of title 10, United States Code, with respect to leave associated with the birth or adoption of a child, the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall promulgate a similar rule, policy, or memorandum that provides leave to officers and enlisted members of the Coast Guard that is equal in duration and compensation to that provided by the Secretary of the Navy.

(b) Leave Associated With Birth or Adoption of Child.—Notwithstanding subsection (a), sections 701 and 704 of title 10, or any other provision of law, all officers and enlisted members of the Coast Guard shall be authorized leave associated with the birth or adoption of a child during the 1-year period immediately following such birth or adoption and, at the discretion of the Commanding Officer, such officer or enlisted member shall be permitted—

(1) to take such leave in increments; and

(2) to use flexible work schedules (pursuant to a program established by the Secretary in accordance with chapter 61 of title 5).

(Added Pub. L. 114–120, title II, §222(a), Feb. 8, 2016, 130 Stat. 49, §431; renumbered §2512 and amended Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §114(b), title III, §315(a), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4223, 4250.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282, §315(a), designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, substituted "Except as provided in subsection (b), not later than 1 year" for "Not later than 1 year", and added subsec. (b).

Pub. L. 115–282, §114(b), renumbered section 431 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Flexible Work Schedules

Pub. L. 115–282, title III, §315(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4250, provided that: "Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Dec. 4, 2018], the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall ensure that a flexible work schedule program under chapter 61 of title 5, United States Code, is in place for officers and enlisted members of the Coast Guard."
Editorial Note on Part 43
Editorial Note: For establishment and determination of certain rates for use in connection with recovery from tortiously liable third persons, see notice documents published by the Office of Management and Budget each year in the Federal Register.

§ 43.3 Settlement and waiver of claims. ( a ) The head of the Department or Agency of the United States asserting such claim, or his or her designee, may: ( 1 ) Accept the full amount of a claim and execute a release therefor;
( 2 ) Compromise or settle and execute a release of any claim, not in excess of $300,000, which the United States has for the reasonable value of such care and treatment; or
( 3 ) Waive and in this connection release any claim, not in excess of $300,000, in whole or in part, either for the convenience of the Government, or if the head of the Department or Agency, or his or her designee, determines that collection would result in undue hardship upon the person who suffered the injury or disease resulting in the care and treatment described in § 43.1.
( b ) Claims in excess of $300,000 may be compromised, settled, waived, and released only with the prior approval of the Department of Justice.
( c ) The authority granted in this section shall not be exercised in any case in which: ( 1 ) The claim of the United States for such care and treatment has been referred to the Department of Justice; or
( 2 ) A suit by the third party has been instituted against the United States or the individual who received or is receiving the care and treatment described in § 43.1 and the suit arises out of the occurrence which gave rise to the third-party claim of the United States.
( d ) The Departments and Agencies concerned shall consult the Department of Justice in all cases involving: ( 1 ) Unusual circumstances;
( 2 ) A new point of law which may serve as a precedent; or
( 3 ) A policy question where there is or may be a difference of views between any of such Departments and Agencies.
[Order No. 1594-92, 57 FR 27356, June 19, 1992, as amended by Order No. 3141-2010, 75 FR 9103, Mar. 1, 2010]
### §241e. Authority to make further adjustments

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to make further adjustments in the boundaries of the park along United States Highways Numbered 10 and 85 as he deems advisable and in the public interest if and when the alinement of these highways is changed: Provided, That not to exceed five hundred acres may be added to the park and not to exceed two thousand acres may be excluded from the park by such adjustments. Boundary adjustments made pursuant to this section shall be effective upon publication thereof in the Federal Register and all Federal land excluded from the park pursuant to sections 241c to 241f of this title shall be transferred to the Secretary of Agriculture for administration or disposition in accordance with title III of the Bankhead-Jones Farm Tenant Act [7 U.S.C. 1010 et seq.].

(Mar. 24, 1956, ch. 94, §3, 70 Stat. 56.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Bankhead-Jones Farm Tenant Act, referred to in text, is act July 22, 1937, ch. 517, 50 Stat. 522. Title III of the Act is classified generally to subchapter III (§1010 et seq.) of chapter 33 of Title 7, Agriculture. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 1000 of Title 7 and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of act Apr. 25, 1947, ch. 41, 61 Stat. 52, which comprises this subchapter.
#### § 42.725 Assurance of compliance.

Each recipient of federal financial assistance from the Department shall sign a written assurance as specified by the Department that it will comply with this subpart in its federally assisted programs or activities.
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 107 

To authorize testimony and representation in United States v. Taubert. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 12, 2019 

Mr. MCCONNELL (for himself and Mr. SCHUMER) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize testimony and representation in United States 

v. Taubert. 

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Taubert, Cr. No. 19– 

21, pending in the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of New York, the prosecution has requested the production of testimony from Erin Kurvers, 

an employee of the office of former Senator Al Franken; 

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the 

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a) 

and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent current and former Members and employees of the 

Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request 

for testimony relating to their official responsibilities; 

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and Rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no eviVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:51 Mar 12, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR107.ATS SR107

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 107 ATS 

dence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, be 

taken from such control or possession but by permission 

of the Senate; and 

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or 

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will 

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges 

of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That Erin Kurvers, a former employee of 

2 the Office of Senator Al Franken, and any other former 

3 employee of the Senator’s office from whom relevant testi4 mony may be necessary, are authorized to testify in the 

5 case of United States v. Taubert, except concerning mat6 ters for which a privilege should be asserted. 

7 SEC. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to 

8 represent Senator Franken and any former employees of 

9 his office in connection with the production of evidence 

10 authorized in section one of this resolution. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
### §§410pp to 410pp–8. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 410pp to 410pp–8 were omitted pursuant to section 410pp which terminated and the Zuni-Cibola National Historical Park was not established, because notice of acceptance of a leasehold interest in the Zuni Indian Reservation was not published during the required period of time.

Section 410pp, Pub. L. 100–567, §2, Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2847; Pub. L. 101–313, title III, §302(1), June 27, 1990, 104 Stat. 279, provided for establishment of the Zuni-Cibola National Historical Park effective on the date of publication by the Secretary of a notice of acceptance of a leasehold interest in the Zuni Indian Reservation pursuant to section 410pp–1 and provided for termination of this section six years after Oct. 31, 1988, unless prior to the end of that six-year period the Secretary had published such a notice.

Section 410pp–1, Pub. L. 100–567, §3, Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2847; Pub. L. 101–313, title III, §302(2), June 27, 1990, 104 Stat. 279; Pub. L. 103–437, §6(k), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4586, set forth conditions under which the Secretary could accept a leasehold offer from the Zuni Tribe, required preparation of a map of the park upon acceptance of the leasehold, and provided for boundary adjustments.

Section 410pp–2, Pub. L. 100–567, §4, Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2848, related to management of the park.

Section 410pp–3, Pub. L. 100–567, §5, Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2849, required consistency with the general management plan for the park and protection from significant adverse effects on the park by any Federal agency with activities affecting the park.

Section 410pp–4, Pub. L. 100–567, §6, Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2849, established the Zuni-Cibola National Historical Park Advisory Commission and provided for the terms of its members, its expenses, Chair, and meetings, and applicability of the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

Section 410pp–5, Pub. L. 100–567, §7, Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2850; Pub. L. 103–437, §6(k), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4586, related to a general management plan for the park.

Section 410pp–6, Pub. L. 100–567, §8, Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2851; Pub. L. 103–437, §6(k), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4586, related to cultural and religious uses of the park.

Section 410pp–7, Pub. L. 100–567, §9, Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2851, set forth definitions.

Section 410pp–8, Pub. L. 100–567, §11, Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2852, authorized appropriations.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Section 1 of Pub. L. 100–567 provided that Pub. L. 100–567, which enacted this subchapter and amended section 460uu–12 of this title, could be cited as the "Zuni-Cibola National Historical Park Establishment Act of 1988".
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

STEVEN M. BETSINGER, Appellant, vs. DHI MORTGAGE COMPANY, LTD., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Respondent. No. 67502 

# FILED MAR 1 8 2016 TRACIE K. LINDEMAN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT

### SDEPUT C 1 74.

. -' 1,
- Rn BY 

### ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is an appeal from a district court order awarding costs. Respondent argues in its answering brief that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the district court has not entered a final judgment following a new trial on punitive damages. Based on that argument and our review of the appendices and docketing statement, we ordered appellant to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, as it appears that the district court has not entered a final, appealable order and that the appeal from the costs award therefore would be premature. 

### See NRAP 3A(b)(8) (allowing appeals from special orders after final judgment).

In his response to our show cause order, appellant argues that he has a final judgment against one of the other parties to the underlying district court action, who is not named in this appeal, and therefore the subsequently entered costs order is appealable As respondent points out, however, the district court has not entered an appealable final judgment following the retrial on punitive damages, and thus, the appeal from the costs award is premature. NRAP 3A(b)(8); 

### Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 426, 996 P.2d 416, 417 (2000) (explaining that a final judgment

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 

### 16 - o 8(05J
.HardestyJ.

J. resolves all of the parties' rights and liabilities, leaving nothing for the future consideration of the court). Accordingly, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Saitta

cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge Lansford W. Levitt, Settlement Judge Feldman Graf McDonald Carano Wilson LLP/Reno McDonald Carano Wilson LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2
101 1947A eo
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of John H. Harland Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Timothy C. Tuff, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
             15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.


/s/ Timothy C. Tuff                                2/27/2007
------------------------------                    ---------------------
Timothy C. Tuff                                   Date
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
SEVETNH AMENDMENT TO THE STRATEGIC MODELING AGREEMENT


         SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO THE STRATEGIC MODELING AGREEMENT ("Amendment")
dated as of December 14, 2001, among BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS EXPRESS, INC., a
Delaware corporation ("BTE"), and THE CREDIT STORE INC., a Delaware corporation
("TCS").

                                WITNESSETH, THAT:


         WHEREAS, BTE and TCS entered into a Strategic Modeling Agreement on the
18th day of March, 1999 ("Agreement), Amendment to the Strategic Modeling
Agreement on the 16th day of March 2001; Second Amendment to the Strategic
Modeling Agreement on the 29th day of May 2001; and Third Amendment to the
Strategic Modeling Agreement on August 16, 2001; Fourth Amendment to the
Strategic Modeling Agreement on September 13, 2001; and Fifth Amendment to the
Strategic Modeling Agreement on October 12, 2001; and Sixth Amendment to the
Strategic Modeling Agreement on November 12, 2001;

         WHEREAS, the Agreement, as amended, is set to terminate on December 14,
2001; and

         WHEREAS, The parties desire to amend their Agreement to extend the
Agreement term for a period of one month (1) month.

        NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:

        Section 1.  Seventh Amendment to the Strategic Modeling Agreement.

                  (a)      The "Data Processing Term" definition is amended in
                           its entirety to read as follows:

                           "Data Processing Term" means the period beginning on
               the date hereof and ending at 11:59 p.m. on January 26, 2001."

                  (b)      The "Modeling Term" definition is amended in its
                           entirety to read as follows:

                           "Modeling Term" means the period beginning on the
                  date hereof and ending at 11:59 p.m. on January 26, 2001."


        Section 2. Counterparts; Effectiveness. This Amendment may be executed
in any number of counterparts, and by different parties hereto in separate
counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed an
original, but all such counterparts together shall constitute but one and the
same instrument.

        Section 3. Affirmation. The parties hereto affirm and acknowledge that
the Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, is, and remains, in full force and
effect in accordance with its terms.


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be
duly executed by their duly authorized representative as of the day and year
first above written.


                             BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS EXPRESS, INC.


                             By:     /s/ Gordon O. Meyer
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                Its:  President



                             THE CREDIT STORE, INC.


                             By:   /s/ Michael J. Philippe
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                Its:  Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
                                        Officer and Treasurer
Exhibit 99.2

                     Form of Section 906 Certification

               CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

                    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of NMXS.com, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 (the
"Report"), I, Teresa Dickey, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of the Company.


/s/ Teresa Dickey
Teresa Dickey
Principal Financial Officer

Date:  August 19, 2002
### §2303. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 95–344, title III, §303, Aug. 15, 1978, 92 Stat. 479; Pub. L. 96–88, title V, §509(b), Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 695; Pub. L. 103–437, §6(d)(18), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4584, related to transportation projects. See section 101522 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
#### § 4.12 Evidence which may be excluded.

The Commission or officer presiding at the hearing may exclude irrelevant, untimely, immaterial, or unduly repetitious evidence.