alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 367.104 Accounts 410.1, 410.2, 411.1, and 411.2, Provision for deferred income taxes. ( a ) Accounts 410.1 (§ 367.4101) and 410.2 (§ 367.4102) must be debited, and Accumulated Deferred Income Taxes must be credited, with amounts equal to any current deferrals of taxes on income or any allocations of deferred taxes originating in prior periods, as provided by the texts of accounts 190 (§ 367.1900), 282 (§ 367.2820), and 283 (§ 367.2830). There must not be netted against entries required to be made to these accounts any credit amounts appropriately includible in accounts 411.1 (§ 367.4111) or 411.2 (§ 367.4112).
( b ) Accounts 411.1 (§ 367.4111) and 411.2 (§ 367.4112) must be credited, and Accumulated Deferred Income Taxes must be debited, with amounts equal to any allocations of deferred taxes originating in prior periods or any current deferrals of taxes on income, as provided by the texts of accounts 190 (§ 367.1900), 282 (§ 367.2820), and 283 (§ 367.2830). There must not be netted against entries required to be made to these accounts any debit amounts appropriately includible in account 410.1 (§ 367.4101) or 410.2 (§ 367.4102).
FROM: THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, COUNTY OF MISSOULA.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. THOMAS F. KRANTZ, Defendant.

NO. 7891 DECISION

On November 13, 1987, the Defendant was sentenced on Count I, Accountability for Robbery and Count TV, Robbery. A thirty (30 years sentence was given on each count plus ten (10 years for the use of a *22weapon. The sentence imposed for the weapon shall run consecutively on each count; and Count I and Count IV shall be served concurrently to each other. The petitioner shall receive credit for 165 days served. Dangerous Offender.

DATED this 23rd day of April, 1990.

On April 23, 1990, the Defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Comb.

The Defendant was present and was represented by William Boggs, Attorney at Law from Missoula. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the Defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it if such is possible. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

After careful consideration, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence imposed shall be affirmed.

The reason for the decision is based upon the presumption of the correctness of the sentence imposed by the District Court.
HomeLatest FilingsPrevious Page

    - SEC Home  »
    - Search the Next-Generation EDGAR System  »
    - Company Search  »
    - Current Page

200 PARK AVENUE25TH FLOORNEW YORK NY 10166         

200 PARK AVENUE25TH FLOORNEW YORK NY 10166         212.750.6060

GOLUB CAPITAL BDC, Inc. CIK#: 0001476765 (see all company filings)
State location: NY | State of Inc.: **DE** | Fiscal Year End: 0930formerly: Golub Capital BDC LLC (filings through 2010-04-14)formerly: GOLUB CAPITAL INVESTMENT Corp (filings through 2017-06-02)Get **insider transactions** for this **issuer**.File Number: **812-15431**

||
||
#### John W. Storandt, Respondent, v. Vogel & Binder Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. AH concurred, except Robson, J., who dissented.
PUBLIC LAW 114–19—MAY 22, 2015 129 STAT. 215 

Public Law 114–19 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To extend the authorization for the replacement of the existing Department of 

Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Denver, Colorado, to make certain improvements in the Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014, and for 

other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Construction Authorization and 

Choice Improvement Act’’. 

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION FOR MAJOR MEDICAL 

FACILITY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs may carry 

out the replacement of the existing Department of Veterans Affairs 

Medical Center in Denver, Colorado, in fiscal year 2015, in an 

amount not to exceed $900,000,000. 

(b) LIMITATION ON OBLIGATION OF FUNDS.—Notwithstanding 

section 8104(c) of title 38, United States Code, or any other provision 

of law, funds may not be obligated or expended for the project 

described in subsection (a) in an amount that would cause the 

total amount obligated for that project to exceed the amount specified in the law for that project (or would add to total obligations 

exceeding such specified amount). 

SEC. 3. CLARIFICATION OF DISTANCE REQUIREMENT FOR EXPANDED 

AVAILABILITY OF HOSPITAL CARE AND MEDICAL SERVICES 

FOR VETERANS THROUGH THE USE OF AGREEMENTS WITH 

NON-DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS ENTITIES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 101(b)(2) of the Veterans Access, 

Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014 (Public Law 113–146; 38 

U.S.C. 1701 note) is amended— 

(1) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ‘‘(as calculated based 

on distance traveled)’’ after ‘‘40 miles’’; and 

(2) in subparagraph (D)(ii), by striking subclause (II), and 

inserting the following new subclause (II): 

‘‘(II) faces an unusual or excessive burden in 

traveling to such a medical facility of the Department based on— 

‘‘(aa) geographical challenges; 

‘‘(bb) environmental factors, such as roads 

that are not accessible to the general public, 

traffic, or hazardous weather; 

Construction 

Authorization 

and Choice 

Improvement 

Act. 

38 USC 101 note. 

May 22, 2015 

[H.R. 2496] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
129 STAT. 216 PUBLIC LAW 114–19—MAY 22, 2015 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2496: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 161 (2015): 

May 21, considered and passed House. 

May 22, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

‘‘(cc) a medical condition that impacts the 

ability to travel; or 

‘‘(dd) other factors, as determined by the 

Secretary.’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by subsection 

(a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act 

and apply with respect to care or services provided on or after 

such date. 

Approved May 22, 2015. 

38 USC 1701 

note. 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
CS 317344-D 06/25/2020

cdc.gov/coronavirus-es

TOME ESTAS 5 MEDIDAS DE SEGURIDAD

para que todos nos mantengamos sanos

QUÉDESE EN CASA SI NO SE SIENTE BIEN

O si la prueba del COVID-19 le da positivo o estuvo 

expuesto a alguien con COVID-19 en los últimos 

14 días

CÚBRASE LA NARIZ Y LA BOCA CON UN 

PAÑUELO DESECHABLE O LA PARTE INTERNA 

DEL CODO AL TOSER O ESTORNUDAR; luego bote 

el pañuelo a la basura y lávese las manos 

MANTÉNGASE A 6 PIES DE OTRAS PERSONAS

que no vivan con usted, tanto dentro como 

fuera del agua, y evite compartir cosas con otros

USE UNA CUBIERTA DE TELA PARA LA CARA

cuando no esté en el agua*

LÁVESE LAS MANOS FRECUENTEMENTE con 

agua y jabón por al menos 20 segundos o use un 

desinfectante de manos que contenga al menos un 

60 % de alcohol

Ahora, ¡nademos!

AT LEAST 6 FEET

1

2

3

4

5

* No les ponga una cubierta de tela para la cara a los niños 

de menos de 2 años ni a cualquier persona que tenga 

dificultad para respirar o esté inconsciente, débil, o que 

por cualquier otro motivo no pueda quitársela sin ayuda.
### §8715. Limitations on obligation of funds

#### (a) In general

In each fiscal year of the covered period, the Board may not obligate an amount greater than the sum of—

(1) 73 percent of the amount of assessments estimated to be collected under section 8705 of this title in such fiscal year;

(2) 73 percent of the amount of assessments actually collected under section 8705 of this title in the most recent fiscal year for which an audit report has been submitted under section 8704(f)(2)(B) of this title as of the beginning of the fiscal year for which the amount that may be obligated is being determined, less the estimate made pursuant to paragraph (1) for such most recent fiscal year; and

(3) amounts permitted in preceding fiscal years to be obligated pursuant to this subsection that have not been obligated.

#### (b) Excess amounts deposited in escrow account

Assessments collected under section 8705 of this title in excess of the amount permitted to be obligated under subsection (a) in a fiscal year shall be deposited in an escrow account for the duration of the covered period.

#### (c) Treatment of amounts in escrow account

During the covered period, the Board may not obligate, expend, or borrow against amounts required under subsection (b) to be deposited in the escrow account. Any interest earned on such amounts shall be deposited in the escrow account and shall be unavailable for obligation for the duration of the covered period.

#### (d) Release of amounts in escrow account

After the covered period, the Board may withdraw and obligate in any fiscal year an amount in the escrow account that does not exceed 1/5 of the amount in the escrow account on the last day of the covered period.

#### (e) Special rule for estimates for particular fiscal years

#### (1) Rule

For purposes of subsection (a)(1), the amount of assessments estimated to be collected under section 8705 of this title in a fiscal year specified in paragraph (2) shall be equal to 62 percent of the amount of assessments actually collected under such section in the most recent fiscal year for which an audit report has been submitted under section 8704(f)(2)(B) of this title as of the beginning of the fiscal year for which the amount that may be obligated is being determined.

#### (2) Fiscal years specified

The fiscal years specified in this paragraph are the 9th and 10th fiscal years that begin on or after October 5, 2018.

#### (f) Covered period defined

In this section, the term "covered period" means the period that begins on October 5, 2018, and ends on the last day of the 11th fiscal year that begins on or after such date.

(Pub. L. 115–254, div. E, §1316, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3483.)
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of NMXS.com, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned principal executive officer and the principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  November
15, 2004





/s/ Richard Govatski

Richard Govatski, President

(Principal Executive Officer)





/s/ Teresa Dickey

Teresa Dickey, Treasurer

(Principal Financial Officer)
```

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Thom W Hayward, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of IS EMPLOYMENT.COM;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly  report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
     quarterly  report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

        (a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
              material information relating to the registrant is made known to
              us by others, particularly during the period in which this
              quarterly  report is being prepared;
        (b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
              controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
              filing date of this quarterly  report (the Evaluation Date); and
        (c)   presented in this quarterly  report our conclusions about the
              effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
              our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
     committee of registrant's board of directors;

        (a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
              internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
              ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
              and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material
              weaknesses in internal controls; and
        (b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
              other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
              internal controls; and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
     quarterly  report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
     controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
     controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including
     any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
     weaknesses.

Date: 5/20/03

/s/ Thom Hayward
    Chief Financial Officer
```
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Leonard R. Roach, *et al.,*Defendants-Appellants.

(No. 70-188;

Fifth District

October 29, 1971.

*877Kenneth L. Gillis, of Defender Project, of Chicago, for appellants.

Richard Richman, State’s Attorney, of Murphysboro, for the People.

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the conviction of defendants on a charge of theft of property under $150 in value (an automobile battery), in violation of Section 16 — 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1969, ch. 38, par. 16 — 1.) The appellants were named as defendants in a criminal information charging them with theft under $150 of an automobile battery belonging to Grob Chevrolet, Inc., Murphysboro, Illinois.

Defendants contend that the evidence at their trial was insufficient to sustain a conviction because there was no evidence in the record to prove that the battery in question was the property of Grob Chevrolet, Inc., as aHeged in the indictment.

 The ownership of property must be proved as laid in an indictment for larceny, and, since larceny is an offense against the owner of property, the owner’s name becomes material to a statement of the offense in the indictment if known, and must be proved as aHeged. Where the ownership of stolen property is aHeged to be in a corporation, the legal existence of the corporation is a material fact and must be proved. *People v.*Smith, 341 Ill. 694, 173 N.E. 814; *People v. Csontos,*275 Ill. 402, 114 N.E. 123; *People v.*Gordon, 5 Ill.2d 91, 125 N.E.2d 73.

 In the present case there was no proof as to the ownership of the battery. Nor was there any proof offered as to the legal existence of Grob Chevrolet, Inc. The proof was therefore insufficient to sustain a material allegation of the indictment.

For the foregoing reasons the judgments of the circuit court of Jackson County are reversed.

Judgments reversed.
IIA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 51 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating 

to contributions and expenditures intended to affect elections. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 30, 2019 

Mr. UDALL (for himself, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. SCHUMER, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. 

BENNET, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. BROWN, Ms. CANTWELL, 

Mr. CARDIN, Mr. CARPER, Mr. CASEY, Mr. COONS, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, 

Ms. DUCKWORTH, Mr. DURBIN, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Ms. 

HARRIS, Ms. HASSAN, Mr. HEINRICH, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. JONES, Mr. 

KAINE, Mr. KING, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. 

MENENDEZ, Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. MURPHY, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. PETERS, 

Mr. REED, Ms. ROSEN, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. SCHATZ, Ms. SMITH, Ms. 

STABENOW, Mr. TESTER, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. WARNER, Ms. WARREN, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. MANCHIN, and Ms. SINEMA) 

introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States relating to contributions and expenditures intended to affect elections. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•SJ 51 IS 

1 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

2 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

3 States: 

4 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

5 ‘‘SECTION 1. To advance democratic self-government 

6 and political equality, and to protect the integrity of gov7 ernment and the electoral process, Congress and the 

8 States may regulate and set reasonable limits on the rais9 ing and spending of money by candidates and others to 

10 influence elections. 

11 ‘‘SECTION 2. Congress and the States shall have 

12 power to implement and enforce this article by appropriate 

13 legislation, and may distinguish between natural persons 

14 and corporations or other artificial entities created by law, 

15 including by prohibiting such entities from spending 

16 money to influence elections. 

17 ‘‘SECTION 3. Nothing in this article shall be con18 strued to grant Congress or the States the power to 

19 abridge the freedom of the press.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-13-00564-CR

ROY DALE GLOVER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 506th District Court of Grimes County. (Tr. Ct. No. 14199).

TO THE 506TH DISTRICT COURT OF GRIMES COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 25th day of September 2014, the case upon appeal to revise 

or to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by 

the trial court on May 28, 2013. After submitting the case on 

the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the 

parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment contains 

no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial 

court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below 

for observance.

Judgment rendered September 25, 2014.

Panel consists of Justices Higley, Bland, and Sharp. Opinion 
delivered by Justice Higley.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in 

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

March 13, 2015 

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT
**Exhibit 21.01**

 

UFPTechnologies, Inc. (“UFPT”) wholly owns the following companies:

 

1.               Moulded Fibre Technology, Inc. (“MFT”),a Maine company

2.               Simco Technologies, Inc. (“Simco”), aMichigan company

3.               Simco Automotive Trim, Inc.(“SAT”), a Michigan company(wholly-owned by Simco)

4.               Stephenson & Lawyer, Inc. (“S&L”),a Michigan company

5.               Patterson Properties Corporation, a Michigancompany (wholly-owned by S&L)

 

1

----
### §225. Laws applicable; easements and rights-of-way

Whenever consistent with the primary purposes of Grand Canyon National Park, the Act of February fifteenth, nineteen hundred and one,1 applicable to the locations of rights of way in certain national parks and the national forests for irrigation and other purposes, and subsequent Acts shall be and remain applicable to the lands included within the park. The Secretary of the Interior may, in his discretion and upon such conditions as he may deem proper, grant easements or rights of way for railroads upon or across the park.

(Feb. 26, 1919, ch. 44, §5, 40 Stat. 1178.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Act of February fifteenth, nineteen hundred and one, referred to in text, is act Feb. 15, 1901, ch. 372, 31 Stat. 790, which is classified to section 959 of Title 43, Public Lands. The Act, insofar as it related to National Park System units, was repealed and restated as section 100902(a) of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs, by Pub. L. 113–287, §§3, 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3094, 3272.

1 See References in Text note below.
Exhibit 23



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February 22, 2006 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Analex Corporation and
subsidiaries included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, in the following Registration Statements:



|   |  |                                                                                                              
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. |  | Registration Statement Number 333-96297 (1994 Stock Option Plan) on Form S-8                                 
|   | 
|2. |  | Registration Statement Number 333-125841 (1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan) on Form S-8                     
|   | 
|3. |  | Registration Statement Number 333-60442 (2000 Stock Option Plan) on Form S-8                                 
|   | 
|4. |  | Registration Statement Number 333-119096 (2002 Stock Option Plan) on Form S-8                                
|   | 
|5. |  | Registration Statement Number 333-125841 (Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement with Mr. Phillips) on Form S-8



/s/
ERNST & YOUNG LLP



McLean, Virginia

March 7, 2006