Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 22, 2011 / Notices 15997 

streetcar line and would not provide 

transit connections to the Fort Mason 

Center. 

Alternative 2 (agency-preferred) 

would extend the existing F–Line from 

Fisherman’s Wharf to the Fort Mason 

Center. Included are new rail track and 

associated new platforms and 

designated stops; retrofitting of the 

historic State Belt Railroad tunnel; and 

a turnaround loop. The track extension 

would include a street-running segment 

along Beach Street, a transition zone 

between the street-running segment and 

the Fort Mason Tunnel segment. Two 

‘‘turnaround segment’’ options for the 

terminus—North Loop (Fort Mason 

parking lot) and South Loop (Great 

Meadow)—were analyzed during a 

Value Analysis (VA) workshop held in 

August of 2010. The VA team focused 

on: (1) Identifying a ‘‘preferred’’ 

alternative for the streetcar extension 

turnaround; (2) identifying 

opportunities to improve value for the 

project; and (3) confirming sustainable 

project goals for the NPS. The VA team 

rated the North Loop turnaround option 

higher than three variations of the South 

Loop turnaround option. Other specific 

project elements include constructing 

streetcar track for approximately 0.85 

miles, construction of 8–9-station 

platforms, upgrades to the existing Fort 

Mason Tunnel, and installation of 

signals, crossings, wires and poles. 

Comments: This notice serves to 

formally open the public review and 

comment phase for the Draft EIS. The 

public and interested organizations are 

encouraged to provide written 

comments on issues and concerns, 

refinements in alternatives, potential 

environmental effects and appropriate 

mitigation measures that would reduce 

potential impacts. To afford an 

opportunity to obtain information, a 

public open house will be hosted on 

April 20, 2011 from 7–9 p.m. in the 

Golden Gate Room, Building A, Fort 

Mason (for directions or information 

about public transit, please consult the 

project Web site or contact the Muni 

Railway Extension Project Manager at 

(415) 561–2872). All written comments 

must be postmarked or transmitted not 

later than 60 days after publication of 

the EPA’s notice of filing in the Federal 

Register—as soon as this ending date is 

confirmed it will be announced on the 

project Web site. 

The project Web site http:// 

parkplanning.nps.gov/ 

StreetcarExtension provides the most 

up-to-date information regarding the 

project, including electronic version of 

the Draft EIS, planning process updates, 

meeting notices, reports and documents, 

and useful links associated with the 

project. Written comments on the Draft 

EIS should be mailed to the following 

address: Superintendent—GGNRA, 

Attn: Rick Foster, Muni Railway 

Extension Project Manager, Fort Mason, 

Bldg. 201, San Francisco, CA 94123. In 

addition to the project Web site, 

requests for printed copy of the Draft 

EIS or to be included on the project 

mailing list can be accommodated by 

contacting the Muni Railway Extension 

Project Manager at (415) 561–2872. 

Before including your address, phone 

number, e-mail address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Decision Process: Availability of the 

Draft EIS for a 60-days public review 

will be formally announced through 

publication of this Notice of 

Availability, through local and regional 

news media, via the project Web site, 

and direct mailing to the project mailing 

list. Following due consideration of all 

public and agency comments, a Final 

EIS will be prepared. As a delegated EIS 

the official responsible for the final 

decision regarding the proposed 

extension is the Regional Director, 

Pacific West Region. Subsequently the 

officials responsible for implementation 

will be the Superintendents of Golden 

Gate National Recreation Area and San 

Francisco Maritime National Historical 

Park. 

Dated: March 15, 2011. 

Christine S. Lehnertz, 

Regional Director, Pacific West Region. 

[FR Doc. 2011–6704 Filed 3–21–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Reclamation 

Information Collection Activities; 

Proposed Information Collection; 

Comment Request 

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Reclamation 

(we, our, or us) intends to seek renewal 

of the following approved information 

collection set to expire on August 31, 

2011: Recreation Visitor Use Surveys. 

We will use several distinct forms to 

collect different types of recreation 

information. Before submitting the 

information collection request—OMB 

No. 1006–0028—to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

renewal, we are soliciting comments on 

specific aspects of the information 

collection. 

DATES: Comments on this notice must be 

received by May 23, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Send all comments 

concerning this notice to Bureau of 

Reclamation, Office of Policy and 

Administration, Attention: Jerome 

Jackson (84–53000), P.O. Box 25007, 

Denver, CO 80225–0007, or via e-mail at 

jljackson@usbr.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

further information or a copy of the 

proposed collection of information 

forms, contact Jerome Jackson at 303– 

445–2712. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 

et seq.), this notice announces that we 

are requesting approval for the 

collection of data from recreational 

users of our lands and waterbodies. 

To meet our needs for the collection 

of visitor use data, we will be requesting 

that OMB reauthorize a two-part 

request. 

The first part of the request provides 

us with a set of 11 pre-approved 

questionnaires to be administered as 

approved by OMB. The second part of 

the request consists of OMB and the 

Bureau of Reclamation agreeing upon a 

process whereby we custom design a 

survey instrument to fit a specific 

situation or area. The custom designed 

survey would be created by extracting 

questions from the approved 

questionnaires as applicable to the area 

and issue being evaluated. Only 

questions included in the pre-approved 

questionnaires will be used. We will 

then submit the new survey form to 

OMB for expedited approval. 

Title: Recreation Visitor Use Surveys. 

Abstract: The Bureau of Reclamation 

is responsible for recreation 

development at all of its reservoirs. 

Presently, there are 289 designated 

recreation areas on our lands within the 

17 Western States. We must be able to 

respond to emerging trends, changes in 

the demographic profile of users, 

changing values, needs, wants, desires, 

and conflicts between user groups. 

Statistically valid and up-to-date data 

derived from users is essential to 

developing and providing recreation 

programs relevant to today’s visitor. 

Respondents: Respondents to the 

surveys will be members of the public 

engaged in recreational activities on our 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
15998 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 22, 2011 / Notices 

lands. Several surveys target people 

engaged in various activities such as 

boating on a specific lake or camping at 

a developed campground. 

Visitors will primarily consist of local 

residents, those from large metropolitan 

areas in the vicinity of the lake/ 

reservoir, and those from out of state. 

Frequency: Varies by survey. 

Estimated Total Number of 

Respondents: 7,531 

Estimated Number of Responses per 

Respondent: 1.0 

Estimated Total of Annual Responses: 

7,531 

Estimated Total Annual Burden 

Hours on Respondents: 2,043 

ESTIMATE OF BURDEN FOR EACH FORM

Survey instrument 

Burden estimate per survey 

(in minutes) 

Number of 

surveys 

(times/yr.) 

Number of respondents per 

survey 

Total estimated number 

of respondents 

Total annual 

hour burden 

Marina Survey ...................................................................... 10 2 278 556 93 

Campground Survey ............................................................ 25 2 278 556 232 

River Instream Flow Survey ................................................ 20 2 278 556 185 

Reservoir Preferred Water Level Survey ............................. 15 2 278 556 139 

Lake/River Visit Expenditure Survey ................................... 15 2 278 556 139 

Recreation Activities Survey ................................................ 15 2 278 556 139 

Recreation Management Survey ......................................... 15 2 278 556 139 

Recreation Fee Survey ........................................................ 10 1 581 581 97 

Recreation Development Survey ......................................... 15 2 278 556 139 

Water Level Impacts on Recreation Boating Use ............... 10 2 278 556 93 

River Recreation Quality Survey ......................................... 20 2 278 556 185 

Customized Surveys ............................................................ 20 5 278 1,390 463 

Totals ............................................................................ ........................ ........................ ........................ 7,531 2,043 

Comments: 

Comments are invited on: 

(a) Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of our functions, including 

whether the information will have 

practical use; 

(b) The accuracy of our estimated time 

and cost burdens of the proposed 

collection of information, including 

the validity of the methodology and 

assumptions used; 

(c) Ways to enhance the quality, use, 

and clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

(d) Ways to minimize the burden of 

the collection of information on 

respondents, including increased use of 

automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

We will summarize all comments 

received regarding this notice. We will 

publish that summary in the Federal 

Register after the information collection 

is submitted to OMB for review and 

renewal. 

Before including your address, phone 

number, e-mail address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Dated: March 9, 2011. 

Roseann Gonzales, 

Director, Policy and Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2011–6631 Filed 3–21–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

Under the Clean Water Act 

Notice is hereby given that on March 

14, 2011, a proposed consent decree in 

United States v. Consol Energy, Inc., et 

al., Civil Action No. 1:11–cv–00028, 

was lodged with the United States 

District Court for the Northern District 

of West Virginia. 

The proposed Consent Decree will 

resolve claims alleged in this action by 

the United States and the State of West 

Virginia as a plaintiff-intervenor against 

Consol Energy, Inc., Consolidation Coal 

Company, and Windsor Coal Company, 

for the discharge of pollutants into 

waters of the United States in violation 

of Section 301 of the Act, 33 U.S.C. 

1311, and in violation of the conditions 

and limitations of National Pollutant 

Discharge Elimination System 

(‘‘NPDES’’) permits issued by the State 

pursuant to Section 402 of the Act, 33 

U.S.C. 1342. Under the proposed 

Consent Decree, Defendants will 

perform injunctive relief with two 

components. To address four mines 

with discharges into the Monongahela 

Basin, Defendants will construct a 

wastewater treatment system, including 

a pipeline system, treatment plant, and 

landfill. To address two mines with 

discharges into the Ohio River Basin, 

Defendants will relocate the discharges 

pursuant to the appropriate permitting 

process. In addition, Consol will pay a 

civil penalty of $5.5 million. 

The Department of Justice will accept 

comments relating to the proposed 

consent decree for a period of thirty (30) 

days from the date of publication of this 

notice. Comments should be addressed 

to the Assistant Attorney General, 

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division, and mailed either 

electronically to pubcommentees.enrd@usdoj.gov or in hard copy to 

P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of 

Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611. 

Comments should refer to United States 

v. Consol Energy, Inc., et al., Civil No. 

1:11–cv–00028 (N.D.W.Va.) and D.J. 

Reference No. 90–5–1–1–09916/1. 

The proposed consent decree may be 

examined at the United States 

Environmental Protection Agency 

(Region 3), 1650 Arch Street, 

Philadelphia, PA 19103. During the 

comment period, the proposed consent 

decree may also be examined on the 

following Department of Justice Web 

site: http://www.justice.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the 

proposed consent decree may also be 

obtained by mail from the Department 

of Justice Consent Decree Library, P.O. 

Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044–7611 

or by faxing or e-mailing a request to 

Tonia Fleetwood 

(tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no. 

(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES