alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.15



February 4, 2005

Brian Piwek
28 Sherwood Downes
Park Ridge, NJ 07656

         Re:      Amendments to your Employment Agreement

Dear Brian:

         As we have discussed, the Company recognizes that due to the changes
that took place on November 15, 2004 (the "Effective Date"), you have Good
Reason to terminate your employment pursuant to Paragraph 8(a) of the Executive
Employment Agreement between you and The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company,
Inc., made and entered into on October 28, 2002 (the "Agreement").

         Whereas, in order to induce you not to terminate your employment within
the 3 month period immediately following the Effective Date, and whereas, you
would prefer not to terminate your employment, it is agreed that with respect to
the changes that took place on November 15, 2004, the 3-month period in the last
sentence of Paragraph 8(a) of the Agreement shall be changed to a 12-month
period. To avoid any misunderstanding, this extension is a one-time extension
that applies only to the changes that occurred on November 15, 2004. For any
other event constituting Good Reason, you must give notice of your termination
for Good Reason within 3 months after the occurrence of such event.

         Although it is the Company's hope that you do not terminate your
employment for Good Reason due to the changes that occurred on November 15,
2004, the Company agrees that if you do so (1) all stock options that have been
granted to you but are unvested as of your separation date will immediately vest
on that date and will be exercisable within one year and (2) you will be 100%
vested in the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) at the Cumulative
Benefit Payable that is applicable to ten years of service (which is 30% of the
highest five year average salary during the last ten years leading up to
retirement).

         Except as indicated above, the Agreement, its terms and conditions
shall remain in full force and effect. If the terms outlined above are
acceptable, please sign below and return to me an original executed copy of this
letter agreement. Upon execution of this letter agreement, the Agreement shall
be deemed amended in accordance with Paragraph 28 thereof.


                              Sincerely,

                              The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.

                              By:/s/Christian Haub




Agreed to and accepted this 8th day of February, 2005.

/s/Brian Piwek
------------------------------
Brian Piwek
### §34. Road extensions

Road extensions and improvements shall be made in the Yellowstone National Park under and in harmony with the general plan of roads and improvements to be approved by the Secretary of the Interior.

(July 1, 1918, ch. 113, §1, 40 Stat. 678.)
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > National Income, 1929-1932

              																	United States. Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce					,	Seventy-Third Congress, 1933-1935					 and 	Kuznets, Simon, 1901-1985. 						*National Income, 1929-1932*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										1934,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/971,			accessed on August 15, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Aerial Anthropology LLC

Aerial Anthropology Safety Standards

The following describes the best practices and safety standards put in place by Aerial 

Anthropology. Each mission and every instance where we are conducting business it will be 

mandated that we operate in a fashion that complies with the following standards.

Mission Procedure:

1. Prior to every mission flown Aerial Anthropology will scout the location and identify 

potential environment conditions, weather conditions, and any public safety issues that 

may arise. All conditions and issues identified will be addressed. If there is no resolution 

and the potential to put anyone, any personal property, or any public property in danger 

exists, we will cancel the mission.

2. Day of mission, the PIC and the VO will reexamine the environment and ensure absolute 

safety exists. If there is any deviation the mission shall be cancelled.

3. PIC and VO will run through pre-flight maintenance checks, pre-flight safety checklist, 

and prepare for the mission. Including clearing airspace via proper channels based on 

location.

4. During flight PIC and VO will follow all Flight Manual rules and regulations to ensure 

complete safety in the NAS.

5. Post-Flight Equipment checklist will be followed. PIC and VO will debrief on the 

missions and ensure all equipment is packaged safely for transport. 

Medical Standards for Aerial Anthropology

1. PIC and VO will be free of any intoxicating substances for a total of 8 hours prior to any 

mission. Examination and verbal acknowledgement of this standard will be required 

from all parties involved in a mission.

2. PIC, VO, and all other participants will be in good health.

3. Should any member of a flight crew, including but not limited to PIC, VO, and scouts, be 

ill or unfit to perform their duties all missions will be cancelled.

4. Medical examinations and notification of any medical conditions that could potentially 

disrupt a mission will be discussed prior to any missions being conducted.

Equipment Standards

1. All equipment used by Aerial Anthropology in the capacity of a flight mission, 

photography sessions, videography session, or editing session will be thoroughly 

examined prior to use.

2. Weekly equipment reviews will be conducted to ensure that the equipment meets all 

safety standards.

3. All equipment will be battery tested weekly and immediately prior to any mission being 

flown.

4. If any equipment is damaged or in questionable condition they will be grounded from any 

mission. Equipment will be reviewed and examined by all parties before being deemed 

worthy for flight.
MONEENEINEBEMiniS 4FSeNt..WM1175?AT■::.- • 4. . • 

parameters provided by the relevant statutes, see NRS 484C.110(1); NRS 

484C.410(1), and appellant does not allege that those statutes are 

unconstitutional. We are not convinced that the sentence imposed is so 

grossly disproportionate to the crime as to constitute cruel and unusual 

punishment. 

To the extent appellant argues that the district court abused 

its discretion in sentencing him, we disagree. See generally Houk v. State, 

103 Nev. 659, 664, 747 P.2d 1376, 1379 (1987) ("The sentencing judge has 

wide discretion in imposing a sentence . . . ."). This court will refrain from 

interfering with the sentence imposed "[s] o long as the record does not 

demonstrate prejudice resulting from consideration of information or 

accusations founded on facts supported only by impalpable or highly 

suspect evidence." Silks v. State, 92 Nev. 91, 94, 545 P.2d 1159, 1161 

(1976). Appellant does not allege that the district court relied on 

impalpable or highly suspect evidence. Considering appellant's three prior 

felonies, we are not convinced that the district court abused its discretion. 

Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2 
giAMMMIE 

cc: Hon. Jerome Polaha, District Judge 

Washoe County Alternate Public Defender 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

3
================================================================================


                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


       In connection with the Annual Report of Amexdrug Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jack Amin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

       (1)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of the
              operation of the Company.



/s/ Jack Amin
------------------------
Jack Amin
Chief Executive Officer
April 9, 2007












--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-71,652]

                    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (“Act”), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on April 27, 2010, applicable to workers of Cooper Tools, Hicksville, Ohio. The workers are engaged in activities related to the production. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on May 28, 2010 (75 FR 30069).                

At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. New information shows that in July, 2010, Apex Tool Group, LLC. purchased Cooper Tools and is currently known as Apex Tool Group, LLC. Some workers separated from employment at Cooper Tools had their wages reported under a separate unemployment insurance (UI) tax accounts for Cooper Tools, currently known as Apex Tool Group, LLC.

Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to properly reflect this matter.

The intent of the Department's certification is to include all workers of the subject firm who were adversely affected by increased imports of air tools, torque wrenches and screwdrivers.

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-71,652 is hereby issued as follows:

All workers of Cooper Tools, currently known as Apex Tool Group, LLC, Hicksville, Ohio, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after July 13, 2008 through April 27, 2012, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on date of certification through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of March 2011.

Elliott S. Kushner,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2011-5653 Filed 3-11-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
# C_2011219EN.01000301.xml

| 23.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 219/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 219/3

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Belgium) lodged on 28 April 2011 — Anton Las v PSA Antwerp NV, previously Hesse Noord Natie NV

(Case C-202/11)

2011/C 219/04

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Anton Las

Applicant:

Defendant: PSA Antwerp NV, previously Hesse Noord Natie NV

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Does the Decree of the Flemish Community of 19 July 1973 (B.S. 6 September 1973) infringe Article 39 of the EC Treaty concerning freedom of movement for workers within the European Union, in that it imposes an obligation on an undertaking situated in the Flemish language region when hiring a worker in the context of employment relations with an international character, to draft all documents relating to the employment relationship in Dutch, on pain of nullity?

---
§ 115.277 Corrective action for contractors and volunteers. ( a ) Any contractor or volunteer who engages in sexual abuse shall be prohibited from contact with residents and shall be reported to law enforcement agencies, unless the activity was clearly not criminal, and to relevant licensing bodies.
( b ) The facility shall take appropriate remedial measures, and shall consider whether to prohibit further contact with residents, in the case of any other violation of agency sexual abuse or sexual harassment policies by a contractor or volunteer.
EXHIBIT 32

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Teleconnect Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  Report),  the  undersigned  Chief
Executive Officer and Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company
each hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 11, 2006


/s/ Gustavo Gomez                           /s/ Alfonso de Borbon
---------------------------                 -----------------------------
Gustavo Gomez, Director,                    Alfonso de Borbon,
Chief Executive Officer,                    Director, Executive Vice
President, Chief Financial                  President and Chief Operating
Officer and Treasurer                       Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1648
ANDREW KARIM ABDESLEM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DALIA LUTTWAK; EDWARD LUTTWAK, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA97-4108-PJM) Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 8, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andrew Karim Abdeslem, Appellant Pro Se. Harold Krauthamer, KRAUTHAMER & STAHL, Chevy Chase, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Andrew Karim Abdeslem appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil complaint charging the defendants with federal crimes. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Abdeslem v. Luttwak , No. CA-97-4108-PJM (D. Md. Apr.10, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>
                                                EXHIBIT 23.1

                INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this
Registration Statement on Form S-8 of American Power
Conversion Corporation and related prospectus pertaining to
the 1993 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, the 1997
Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, the 1997 Stock
Option Plan and the 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our
report dated February 10, 1997, relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of American Power Conversion Corporation as
of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and related consolidated
statements of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows
for each of the years in the three year period ended
December 31, 1996, and related schedule, which report
appears in the 1996 annual report on Form 10-K of American
Power Conversion Corporation.


                              (signed) KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Providence, Rhode Island
July 29, 1997
§ 32.44 Hearing Officer determination. ( a ) Upon his determining a claim, the Hearing Officer shall file a notice of the same simultaneously with the Director (for his review under subpart F of this part in the event of approval) and the PSOB Office, which notice shall specify the factual findings and legal conclusions that support it.
( b ) Upon a Hearing Officer's approving or denying a claim, the PSOB Office shall serve notice of the same simultaneously upon the claimant (and upon any other claimant who may have filed a claim with respect to the same public safety officer). Such notice shall— ( 1 ) Specify the Hearing Officer's factual findings and legal conclusions that support it; and
( 2 ) In the event of a denial, provide information as to Director appeals.
( c ) Upon a claimant's failure (without reasonable justification or excuse) to pursue in timely fashion the determination of his claim pursuant to his filed request therefor, the Director may, at his discretion, deem the request to be abandoned, as though never filed. Not less than thirty-three days prior thereto, the PSOB Office shall serve the claimant with notice of the Director's intention to exercise such discretion.
[71 FR 46037, Aug. 10, 2006, as amended at 78 FR 29234, May 20, 2013; 83 FR 22387, May 15, 2018]
### SUBCHAPTER LIX–K—GREAT BASIN NATIONAL PARK
#### § 2.6 Withheld and forfeited good time.

While neither a forfeiture of good time nor a withholding of good time shall bar a prisoner from receiving a parole hearing, section 4206 of title 18 of the U.S. Code permits the Commission to parole only those prisoners who have substantially observed the rules of the institution.

[43 FR 38822, Aug. 31, 1978]
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  quarterly  report  of  GoAmerica,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended  June 30,  2004  filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Donald G. Barnhart,  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects,  the consolidated  financial  condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and consolidated  results of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.

Dated: August 12, 2004

                                                  /s/ Donald G. Barnhart
                                                  ----------------------
                                                  Donald G. Barnhart
                                                  Chief Financial Officer




This  certification  has been  furnished  solely  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
### §230b. Owner's retention of right of use and occupancy for residential purposes for life or fixed term of years; election of term; fair market value; transfer, assignment or termination; "improved property" defined

Within the Barataria Preserve Unit, the owner or owners of improved property used for noncommercial residential purposes on a year-round basis may, as a condition of the acquisition of such property by the Secretary, elect to retain a right of use and occupancy of such property for noncommercial residential purposes if, in the judgment of the Secretary, the continued use of such property for a limited period would not unduly interfere with the development or management of the park. Such right of use and occupancy may be either a period ending on the death of the owner or his spouse, whichever occurs last, or a term of not more than twenty-five years, at the election of the owner. Unless the property is donated, the Secretary shall pay to the owner the fair market value of the property less the fair market value of the right retained by the owner. Such right may be transferred or assigned and may be terminated by the Secretary, if he finds that the property is not used for noncommercial residential purposes, upon tender to the holder of the right an amount equal to the fair market value of the unexpired term. As used in this section, the term "improved property" means a single-family, year-round dwelling, the construction of which was begun before January 1, 1977 (or January 1, 2007, for areas added to the park after that date), which serves as the owner's permanent place of abode at the time of its acquisition by the United States, together with not more than three acres of land on which the dwelling and appurtenant buildings are located which the Secretary finds is reasonably necessary for the owner's continued use and occupancy of the dwelling.

(Pub. L. 95–625, title IX, §903, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3536; Pub. L. 111–11, title VII, §7105(c), (f)(2)(A), Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1192, 1193.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2009—Pub. L. 111–11 substituted "Barataria Preserve Unit" for "Barataria Marsh Unit" in first sentence and inserted "(or January 1, 2007, for areas added to the park after that date)" after "January 1, 1977" in fifth sentence.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### "Secretary" Defined

Secretary means the Secretary of the Interior, see section 2 of Pub. L. 95–625, set out as a note under section 45f of this title.