alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  SBA Leadership 
-  Yvette T. Collazo 

#   Yvette T. Collazo

Deputy Associate Administrator 

Office of Entrepreneurial Development

            Download high-resolution image          

Yvette T. Collazo serves as the Deputy Associate Administrator for the Office of Entrepreneurial Development.  Prior to this appointment, she served as the District Director of SBA's Puerto Rico & U.S. Virgin Islands District Office for seven years.

Ms. Collazo’s Federal career spans more than 30 years, most recently she served as the Director of the Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) where she led efforts to ensure chemical safety under the Toxic Substances Control Act.

Ms. Collazo also served as Director for the Office of Technology Innovation & Development at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Environmental Management. In this capacity, she led in the identification and advancement of technologies, processes, and technical practices that improved the performance of waste processing, groundwater and soil, Decontamination and Decommissioning, and nuclear materials projects over their lifecycle, from planning to disposal. She also served in several management positions at the U.S. DOE Chicago Office.

In 2006, Ms. Collazo entered the Senior Executive Service (SES) ranks and was appointed Assistant Manager for Closure Project at the DOE Savannah River Operations Office.  In this position she led activities related to interagency agreements, federal compliance agreements, and federal contracting of over $250 million related to the clean-up of radiological, industrial and groundwater hazards resulting from more than 40 years of nuclear materials production at the 310-square mile Savannah River Site Federal facility.

Ms. Collazo holds a Master of Science in Environmental Management from the Illinois Institute of Technology and a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez Campus.  Ms. Collazo is a native of Puerto Rico.
# Frequently Asked Questions

## DAWN

About DAWN

Definitions

Using DAWN's Data

## General

About SAMHSA

About Our Data

Finding Treatment

## N-SUMHSS

About N-SUMHSS

Information for Facilities

Using N-SUMHSS Data

## NSDUH

Basic Information about NSDUH

Concerns about Trend Comparability

Details about Microdata and Survey Questions

Finding Commonly Requested Data Products

Help with Analysis

NSDUH Topic Coverage

Questions about Published Tables

## Office of Evaluation (OE)

About OE

OE Policy and Procedures

OE reports

## RDC

Applying for Access

Data at RDCs

Using the RDCs

**Still need help?**Contact Us
### §1a–8. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 98–540, §4, Oct. 24, 1984, 98 Stat. 2719; Pub. L. 103–437, §6(d)(1), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4583; Pub. L. 104–333, div. I, title VIII, §814(d)(1)(F), Nov. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 4196, related to maintenance management system for the National Park System. Subsec. (a) was repealed and restated in section 101301 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs. Subsec. (b), which required annual status reports, had been previously repealed by Pub. L. 104–333.
FROM: THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SHERIDAN.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. MICHAEL WALTER FRASIER, Defendant.

No. 938 DECISION

DATED this 3rd day of August, 1990.

On April 19, 1990, the Defendant was sentenced to five (5) years for Count II, Criminal Possession of Dangerous Drugs With the Intent to Sell. The sentence shall run consecutively to Cause #880; and he shall receive credit for sixteen (16) days time served.

On August 3, 1990, the Defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The Defendant was present and was represented by Francis J. McCarvel, Attorney at Law from Glasgow, Montana. The state was not represented. Before hearing the application, the Defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it if such is possible. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed. After careful consideration, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall remain the same as originally imposed and shall be served consecutively with Cause #880 as amended.

The reason for the decision is based upon the presumption of the validity of the District Court Judgment.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, David De Witt,  certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of wwbroadcast.net inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated this 14th day of August, 2003.



| | /s/ David De Witt
David De Witt
Principal Executive Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------
### §78d–1. Delegation of functions by Commission

#### (a) Authorization; functions delegable; eligible persons; application of other laws

In addition to its existing authority, the Securities and Exchange Commission shall have the authority to delegate, by published order or rule, any of its functions to a division of the Commission, an individual Commissioner, an administrative law judge, or an employee or employee board, including functions with respect to hearing, determining, ordering, certifying, reporting, or otherwise acting as to any work, business, or matter. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to supersede the provisions of section 556(b) of title 5, or to authorize the delegation of the function of rulemaking as defined in subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5, with reference to general rules as distinguished from rules of particular applicability, or of the making of any rule pursuant to section 78s(c) of this title.

#### (b) Right of review; procedure

With respect to the delegation of any of its functions, as provided in subsection (a) of this section, the Commission shall retain a discretionary right to review the action of any such division of the Commission, individual Commissioner, administrative law judge, employee, or employee board, upon its own initiative or upon petition of a party to or intervenor in such action, within such time and in such manner as the Commission by rule shall prescribe. The vote of one member of the Commission shall be sufficient to bring any such action before the Commission for review. A person or party shall be entitled to review by the Commission if he or it is adversely affected by action at a delegated level which (1) denies any request for action pursuant to section 77h(a) or section 77h(c) of this title or the first sentence of section 78l(d) of this title; (2) suspends trading in a security pursuant to section 78l(k) of this title; or (3) is pursuant to any provision of this chapter in a case of adjudication, as defined in section 551 of title 5, not required by this chapter to be determined on the record after notice and opportunity for hearing (except to the extent there is involved a matter described in section 554(a)(1) through (6) of such title 5).

#### (c) Finality of delegated action

If the right to exercise such review is declined, or if no such review is sought within the time stated in the rules promulgated by the Commission, then the action of any such division of the Commission, individual Commissioner, administrative law judge, employee, or employee board, shall, for all purposes, including appeal or review thereof, be deemed the action of the Commission.

(June 6, 1934, ch. 404, title I, §4A, as added Pub. L. 100–181, title III, §308(a), Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1254.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 78d–1, Pub. L. 87–592, §1, Aug. 20, 1962, 76 Stat. 394; Pub. L. 94–29, §25, June 4, 1975, 89 Stat. 163; Pub. L. 95–251, §2(a)(4), Mar. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 183, provided for subject matter similar to the provisions comprising this section, prior to repeal by section 308(b) of Pub. L. 100–181.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 926 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 926

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure that kombucha is 
   exempt from any excise taxes and regulations imposed on alcoholic 
                               beverages.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 28, 2019

   Mr. Wyden introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure that kombucha is 
   exempt from any excise taxes and regulations imposed on alcoholic 
                               beverages.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Keeping Our Manufacturers from Being 
Unfairly taxed while Championing Health Act'' or ``KOMBUCHA''.

SEC. 2. TAX-FREE PRODUCTION OF KOMBUCHA.

    (a) Exception From Definition of Brewer.--Subsection (d) of section 
5052 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as 
follows:
    ``(d) Brewer.--
            ``(1) In general.--For purposes of this chapter, the term 
        `brewer' means any person who brews beer or produces beer for 
        sale.
            ``(2) Exception.--The term `brewer' shall not include any 
        person who--
                    ``(A) produces only beer exempt from tax under 
                subsection (e) of section 5053, or
                    ``(B) produces only kombucha exempt from tax under 
                subsection (i) of such section.''.
    (b) Exemption From Tax.--Section 5053 of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (i) as subsection (j); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (h) the following new 
        subsection:
    ``(i) Production of Kombucha.--
            ``(1) In general.--Subject to regulation prescribed by the 
        Secretary, any person may, without payment of tax, produce 
        kombucha for consumption or sale.
            ``(2) Definition.--For purposes of this chapter, the term 
        `kombucha' means a beverage which--
                    ``(A) is fermented solely by a symbiotic culture of 
                bacteria and yeast,
                    ``(B) contains not more than 1.25 percent of 
                alcohol by volume,
                    ``(C) is sold or offered for sale as kombucha, and
                    ``(D) is derived from--
                            ``(i) sugar, malt or malt substitute, tea, 
                        or coffee, and
                            ``(ii) not more than 20 percent other 
                        wholesome ingredients.''.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



EXHIBIT (32)(a)

Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, John A. Emrich, as Chief Executive Officer of Guilford Mills, Inc. (the
Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my knowledge:



|(1) |  | the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal
year ended September 28, 2003 (the Report), filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.                                                                                                                                                  

|                                      | 
|------------------------------------- | 
|Dated: December 22, 2003              | 
|                                      | 
|/s/ John A. Emrich                    | 
|                                      | 
|John A. Emrich                        | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer |
### §17k. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, act June 23, 1936, ch. 735, §1, 49 Stat. 1894, related to park, parkway and recreational-area programs; study by National Park Service; consent of States; purpose; cooperation of government agencies. See section 100504(a)(2), (3) of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
### **CHAPTER 34—RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION PROGRAM**
### §3774. Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this chapter not more than $75,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2019 through 2023.

(Pub. L. 109–294, §5, Oct. 3, 2006, 120 Stat. 1354; Pub. L. 116–9, title VII, §7001(a), Mar. 12, 2019, 133 Stat. 779.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2019—Pub. L. 116–9 substituted "2019 through 2023" for "2006 through 2011".
# C_2011232EN.01001501.xml

| 6.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/15

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany), lodged on 11 May 2011 — BrainProducts GmbH v Bio Semi V.O.F. and Others

(Case C-219/11)

(2011/C 232/24)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Claimant and appellant: BrainProducts GmbH

Defendants and respondents: Bio Semi V.O.F., Antonius Pieter Kuiper,. Robert Jan Gerard Honsbeek, Alexander Coenraad Metting van Rijn

Question referred

Does a product which is intended by the manufacturer to be applied for human beings for the purpose of investigation of a physiological process constitute a medical device, within the terms of the third indent of Article 1(2)(a) of Directive 93/42/EEC, (1) only in the case where it is intended for a medical purpose?

---

(1)  Council Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning medical devices (OJ 1993 L 169, p. 1), last amended by Directive 2007/47/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 5 September 2007 (OJ 2007 L 247, p. 21).

---
1

 
**TRANSPORTATION SERVICE AGREEMENT**SYSTEM: Churchtown o Holmesville o North Trumbull þ***SELECT ONLY ONE*****C.****TRANSPORTATION SERVICE**     Quality of Service: FIRM (___) Maximum Daily Quantity (MDQ):                                         DthINTERRUPTIBLE (x)     Production Gas Heat Content*:                      btu/cubic foot (attach latest sample test)     **Shrinkage**: 3.5%; After a date not earlier than there years from the date of the Entry of thePublic Utilities Commission approving Cobra’s Tariff, P.U.C.O. No. 1, and each calendar yearthereafter during the term hereof as that term may be extended pursuant to Section 4 of thisTransportation Service Agreement, Company may adjust this shrinkage to reflect its operatingexperience.     **Balancing Time Period**: Monthly     **D. ****PROCESSING NAD COMPRESSION SERVICE*** (applicable only if heat content is great than 1,120Btu/cu.ft.):     Accepted: (                    )**E.****NOTICES**   To Cobra: To Customer:   Cobra Pipeline Co. Ltd. Northeast Ohio Natural Gas3511 Lost Nation Rd. Suite 213 P.O. Box 430Willoughby, Ohio 44094 Lancaster, Ohio 43130Attention: Customer Service Attention: Stephanie PattonPhone: 440-255-1945 Phone: 740-862-3300Fax: 440-255-1985 Gas: 740-862-6330E-Mail: swilliams@cobrapipeline.com E-Mail: spatton@neogas.com     Brainard Gas Corp.  8500 Station Street, Suite 100  Mentor, Ohio 44060  Attention: Thomas J. Smith  Phone: 440-974-3770  Fax: 440-205-8528  E-Mail: tsmith13@sprynet.com     Orwell Natural Gas Company  8500 Station Street, #100  Mentor, Ohio 44060  Attention: Thomas J. Smith  Phone: 440-974-3770  Gas: 440-205-8528  E-Mail: tsmith13@sprynet.com
2

 
**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the parties hereto have accordingly and duly executed this Agreement as of thedate hereinafter first mentioned.**COBRA PIPELINE CO., LTD. NORTHEAST OHIO NATURAL GAS COMPANY**           By: /s/ Richard M. Osborne Richard M. Osborne,   By: /s/ Martin Whelan Martin Whelan, Vice President    Managing Member                         **ORWELL NATURAL GAS COMPANY**                   By: /s/ Thomas J. Smith                     Thomas J. Smith, President                   **BRAINARD GAS CORP.**                   By: /s/ Thomas J. Smith Thomas J. Smith, President  
3
#### Louis Greenfield, Appellant, v. City of New York et al., Respondents.

Ho opinion. Carswell, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001.

      --------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of OSK CAPITAL II CORP.(the  "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, George Metrakos ,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:   February 2, 2006

         /s/ George Metrakos
         -----------------------
         George Metrakos
         Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS RESTATED SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR THE PERIODS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1994.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0000043287
<NAME> GREAT AMERICAN MANAGEMENT AND INVESTMENT, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1994             DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1994             JAN-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1994             SEP-30-1994
<CASH>                                              32                      48
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       13                       9
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                         68                      68
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   518                     557
<PP&E>                                             201                     198
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (91)                    (90)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     948                     986
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              154                     184
<BONDS>                                            180                     199
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               47                      46
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                         249                     184
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       948                     986
<SALES>                                            576                     433
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   593                     445
<CGS>                                              472                     355
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      479                     360
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  12                      15
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     75                      20
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (18)                       4
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 92                      16
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (28)                    (26)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (12)                    (12)
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                        52                    (22)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.38                  (2.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.38                  (2.18)
        

</TABLE>