alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 90842 / January 4, 2021

INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940

Release No. 5659 / January 4, 2021

INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940

Release No. 34160 / January 4, 2021

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-18414

IN THE MATTER OF

EUGENE TERRACCIANO

NOTICE THAT INITIAL DECISION HAS BECOME FINAL

The time for filing a petition for review of the initial decision in this proceeding has

expired. No such petition has been filed by Eugene Terracciano or the Division of Enforcement, 

and the Commission has not chosen to review the decision on its own initiative.

Accordingly, notice is hereby given, pursuant to Rule 360(d) of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice,1that the initial decision of the administrative law judge has become the final 

decision of the Commission with respect to Eugene Terracciano.

2 The orders contained in that 

decision are hereby declared effective. The initial decision ordered that: (a) pursuant to Sections 

15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 203(f) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, 

Eugene Terracciano is suspended for twelve months from associating with any broker, dealer, 

investment adviser, municipal securities dealer, municipal advisor, transfer agent, or nationally 

recognized statistical rating organization; (b) pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Securities 

Exchange Act of 1934, Eugene Terracciano is suspended for twelve months from participating in 

an offering of penny stock, including acting as a promoter, finder, consultant, agent, or other 

person who engages in activities with a broker, dealer, or issuer for purposes of the issuance or

trading in any penny stock, or inducing or attempting to induce the purchase or sale of any penny 

stock; and (c) pursuant to Section 9(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, Eugene 

 

1

 17 C.F.R. § 201.360(d).

2

 Eugene Terracciano, Initial Decision Release No. 1388, 2019 WL 5513382 (Oct. 22, 2019). 
2

Terracciano is prohibited for twelve months from serving or acting as an employee, officer, 

director, member of an advisory board, investment adviser or depositor of, or principal 

underwriter for, a registered investment company or affiliated person of such investment adviser, 

depositor, or principal underwriter. 

For the Commission, by the Office of the General Counsel, pursuant to delegated 

authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

 Secretary
### NUMBER 13

- 13

- 00 138

- C V


## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

A TRACT OF LAND CONTAINING 5.19 ACRES, BEING THE SOUTH 203.33 FEET OF THE WEST 1111.15 FEET OUT OF LOT 44

- 9 WEST ADDITION TO SHARYLAND, HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS; AND ONE (1) MOBILE HOME , Appellant,

v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee.

On appeal from the 275 th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.



## ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Justices Garza, Benavides , and Perkes

Order Per Curiam2

Th is cause is before the Court because the court reporter, Dahlia Robledo , has
failed to timely file the reporter ’ s record. Appellant’s counsel made a request for
preparation of the record on or about October 18, 2013. The reporter has previously
requested and received two extensions of time to file the record , granting the reporter

until April 1 , 2014 to file the record. The reporter was notified that the court will not look
favorably upon any further extensions . To date, Robledo has not filed the reporter ’ s

record.
This sequence of events requires us to effectuate our responsibility to avoid further
delay and to preserve t he parties ’ rights. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(a)(1). Accordingly,
this appeal is ABATED and the cause REMANDED to the trial court.
Upon remand, the judge of the trial court shall immediately cause notice to be given
and conduct a hearing to determine whet her appellant has abandoned his appeal. If it
is determined that appellant has not abandoned his appeal, the court shall further
determine if appellant ’ s attorney of record continues to represent appellant and will
diligently pursue this appeal.

The cou rt shall further determine if the reporter ’ s record, or any part thereof, has
been lost or destroyed, and shall make appropriate findings under Tex. R. App. P. 34.6(f),
if necessary. Otherwise, the court shall determine what steps are necessary to ensure
the prompt preparation of a reporter's record, and shall enter any orders required to avoid
further delay and to preserve the parties ’ rights.
The trial court shall prepare and file its findings and orders and cause them to be
included in a supplemental clerk's record which should be submitted to the Clerk of this3

Court within thirty days from the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the 15th day of May, 2014

.
§ 42.612 Interagency consultation. ( a ) Before investigating whether the employment practices of a recipient of Federal financial assistance constitute a pattern or practice of unlawful discrimination or initiating formal administrative enforcement procedures on that basis, an agency shall, to the extent practical, consult with the Chairman of the EEOC and the Assistant Attorney General to assure that duplication of effort will be minimized.
( b ) Prior to the initiation of any legal action against a recipient of Federal financial assistance alleging unlawful employment practices, the Department of Justice and/or EEOC shall, to the extent practical, notify the appropriate agency or agencies of the proposed action and the substance of the allegations.
# C_2011030EN.01004502.xml

| 29.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/45

---

Action brought on 22 November 2010 — Organismos Kypriakis Galaktokomikis Viomichanias v OHIM — Garmo (GAZI Hellim)

(Case T-535/10)

()

2011/C 30/82

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Organismos Kypriakis Galaktokomikis Viomichanias (Lefkosia, Cyprus) (represented by: C. Milbradt and H. Van Volxem, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Garmo AG (Stuttgart, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 20 September 2010 in Case R 1497/2009-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 20 September 2010 in Case R 1497/2009-4;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the appeal proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Garmo AG

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: the figurative mark ‘GAZI Hellim’ for goods in Class 29

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the collective word mark ‘HALLOUMI’ for goods in Class 29

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: rejection of the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1), as the marks and goods at issue are similar and there is a likelihood of confusion between the marks

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
§ 551.12 Eligibility to marry. An inmate's request to marry shall be approved provided: ( a ) The inmate is legally eligible to marry;
( b ) The inmate is mentally competent;
( c ) The intended spouse has verified, ordinarily in writing, an intention to marry the inmate; and
( d ) The marriage poses no threat to institution security or good order, or to the protection of the public.
# C_2010134EN.01003901.xml

| 22.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/39

---

Action brought on 5 March 2010 — Luxembourg v Commission

(Case T-109/10)

2010/C 134/67

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (represented by: C. Schiltz, Agent, and P. Kinsch, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the contested decision in so far as it applies to the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision in so far as it applies to the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant seeks the annulment, in so far as it applies to the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, of Commission Decision C(2009) 10712 of 23 December 2009 reducing the assistance granted to the Community Initiative Interreg II/C ‘Rhine/Meuse Flooding*’ in the Kingdom of Belgium, Federal Republic of Germany, the French Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and the Kingdom of the Netherlands by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) under Commission Decision C(97) 3742 of 18 December 1997 (ERDF No. 970010008).

In support of its action, the applicant puts forward two pleas in law.

By the first plea in law, the applicant claims that if the actions for annulment brought by the Dutch and German authorities are upheld, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg should benefit as a result. If it is found that the errors and weaknesses, allegedly systematic, which the Commission’s audit was thought to have revealed in the functioning of the program in question in the Netherlands and Germany, do not in reality exist, the very basis of the decision’s reasoning fails and with it the linear financial correction applied to the projects implemented in Luxembourg.

The second plea in law alleges the illegality of the extension, to the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, of a financial adjustment* that might be justified only in respect of other Member States. No anomalies have been found in the operation* of the program in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. The fact that Luxembourg agreed to participate in a joint project with Germany, Belgium, France and the Netherlands does not justify the negative effects, in terms of financial adjustment* of its own projects, of errors or weaknesses that were discovered during the audit of Dutch or German projects, and which consist almost exclusively in alleged breaches of provisions of the procedure for awarding public contracts. Despite the fact that this is a matter of joint participation by five Member States in the same program, procedures for public procurement* awarding public contracts come within the exclusive responsibility of the national authorities of the Member States concerned.

*

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Quotemedia, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, R. Keith Guelpa, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                                        
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ R. Keith Guelpa                    
|    |  | R. Keith Guelpa Chief Executive
Officer
|    |  | November 9, 2005
§ 115.141 Screening for risk of victimization and abusiveness. ( a ) In lockups that are not utilized to house detainees overnight, before placing any detainees together in a holding cell, staff shall consider whether, based on the information before them, a detainee may be at a high risk of being sexually abused and, when appropriate, shall take necessary steps to mitigate any such danger to the detainee.
( b ) In lockups that are utilized to house detainees overnight, all detainees shall be screened to assess their risk of being sexually abused by other detainees or sexually abusive toward other detainees.
( c ) In lockups described in paragraph (b) of this section, staff shall ask the detainee about his or her own perception of vulnerability.
( d ) The screening process in the lockups described in paragraph (b) of this section shall also consider, to the extent that the information is available, the following criteria to screen detainees for risk of sexual victimization: ( 1 ) Whether the detainee has a mental, physical, or developmental disability;
( 2 ) The age of the detainee;
( 3 ) The physical build and appearance of the detainee;
( 4 ) Whether the detainee has previously been incarcerated; and
( 5 ) The nature of the detainee's alleged offense and criminal history.
CS 315899-A 03/13/2020

A new respiratory disease—coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)—may impact your community. 

Get ready! Steps you take to prepare your clinic for flu can also help protect your patients and healthcare 

workers from COVID-19:

Before Patients Arrive

• Prepare the clinic.

- Know which of your patients are at higher 

risk of adverse outcomes from COVID-19.

- Consider and plan for providing more 

telemedicine appointments. 

- Know how to contact your health 

department. 

- Stay connected with your health 

department to know about COVID-19 

in your community. Step up precautions 

when the virus is spreading in 

your community. 

- Assess and restock supplies now and on 

a regular schedule.

• Communicate with patients. 

- Ask patients about symptoms during 

reminder calls. 

- Consider rescheduling non-urgent 

appointments. 

- Post signs at entrances and in waiting 

areas about prevention actions. 

• Prepare the waiting area and 

patient rooms. 

- Provide supplies—tissues, alcohol-based 

hand rub, soap at sinks, and trash cans.

- Place chairs 3–6 feet apart, when possible. 

Use barriers (like screens), if possible.

- If your office has toys, reading materials, 

or other communal objects, remove 

them or clean them regularly. 

When Patients Arrive

• Place staff at the entrance to ask patients 

about their symptoms. 

- Provide symptomatic patients with 

tissues or facemasks to cover mouth 

and nose. 

- Limit non-patient visitors. 

• Separate sick patients with symptoms. 

- Allow patients to wait outside or in the 

car if they are medically able.

- Create separate spaces in waiting areas 

for sick and well patients.

- Place sick patients in a private room as 

quickly as possible.

After Patients are Assessed

• After patients leave, clean frequently 

touched surfaces using EPA-registered 

disinfectants—counters, beds, seating. 

• Provide at-home care instructions

to patients with respiratory symptoms. 

Consider telehealth options for follow up. 

• Notify your health department of 

patients with COVID-19 symptoms. 

Train and prepare your staff now

• Ensure that clinical staff know the right ways to put on, 

use, and take off PPE safely. 

• Recognize the symptoms of COVID-19— fever, cough, 

shortness of breath. 

• Implement procedures to quickly triage and separate 

sick patients. 

• Emphasize hand hygiene and cough etiquette 

for everyone.

• Ask staff to stay home if they are sick. 

• Send staff home if they develop symptoms 

while at work. 

For more information: www.cdc.gov/COVID19

Get Your Clinic Ready for 

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1995
<CASH>                                           7,017
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,769
<ALLOWANCES>                                       213
<INVENTORY>                                    157,968
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               194,342
<PP&E>                                         857,689
<DEPRECIATION>                                 280,563
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 961,830
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          170,830
<BONDS>                                        220,395
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,724
<OTHER-SE>                                     486,953
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   961,830
<SALES>                                      2,568,061
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,568,061
<CGS>                                        1,951,248
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,951,248
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               481,017
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,368
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                116,428
<INCOME-TAX>                                    46,227
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             70,201
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    70,201
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.67
        

</TABLE>
§ 385.706 Initial and reply briefs before initial decision (Rule 706). ( a ) *When filed.* The presiding officer will prescribe a time for filing initial or reply briefs and for service of such briefs, giving due regard to the nature of the proceeding, the extent of the record, and the number and complexity of the issues. Unless the presiding officer otherwise orders, the time prescribed in a proceeding for filing briefs will be the same for all initial briefs and the same for all reply briefs.
( b ) *Contents.* ( 1 ) An initial brief filed with the presiding officer must include: ( i ) A concise statement of the case;
( ii ) A separate section containing proposed findings and conclusions, unless waived by the presiding officer;
( iii ) Arguments in support of the participant's position; and
( iv ) Any other matter required by the presiding officer.
( 2 ) ( i ) A reply brief filed with the presiding officer must be limited to a response to any arguments and issues raised in the initial briefs.
( ii ) The presiding officer may impose limits on the reply brief in addition to any prescribed under paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section.
( c ) *Form.* ( 1 ) An exhibit admitted in evidence or marked for identification in the record may not be reproduced in the brief, but may be reproduced, within reasonable limits, in an appendix to the brief. Any pertinent analysis of an exhibit may be included in a brief.
( 2 ) If a brief exceeds 20 pages, the brief must be accompanied by a table of contents and of points made, including page references, and an alphabetical list of citations, with page references.
( d ) *Record.* All initial and reply briefs will accompany the record and be available to the Commission and the presiding officer for consideration in deciding the case.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from  the
unaudited financial statements for the period ended September 30, 2000 that were
filed  with the company's report on Form 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety
by  reference  to  such  financial  statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         1
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     0
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0


</TABLE>