Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 50 / Tuesday, March 15, 2011 / Notices 14007 

968TH—MEETING—Continued 

Item No. Docket No. Company 

E–4 ........ RM09–18–001 ............................................. Revision to Electric Reliability Organization Definition of Bulk Electric System. 

E–5 ........ RM11–14–000 ............................................. Analysis of Horizontal Market Power under the Federal Power Act. 

E–6 ........ RM10–16–000 ............................................. System Restoration Reliability Standards. 

E–7 ........ RM10–10–000 ............................................. Planning Resource Adequacy Assessment Reliability Standard. 

E–8 ........ RM10–15–000 ............................................. Mandatory Reliability Standards for Interconnection Reliability Operating Limits. 

E–9 ........ RM09–19–000 ............................................. Western Electric Coordinating Council Qualified Transfer Path Unscheduled Flow Relief Regional Reliability Standard. 

E–10 ...... RR09–6–003 ............................................... North American Electric Reliability Corporation. 

E–11 ...... OMITTED. 

E–12 ...... ER11–2256–000 .......................................... California Independent System Operator Corporation. 

E–13 ...... EL08–47–006 .............................................. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. 

E–14 ...... EL11–12–000 .............................................. Idaho Wind Partners 1, LLC. 

E–15 ...... EL10–1–001 ................................................ Southern California Edison Company. 

E–16 ...... EL10–84–002 .............................................. Californians for Renewable Energy, Inc. v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Southern California Edison Company, San Diego Gas & Electric Company and the California Public Utilities Commission. 

Gas 

G–1 ........ OMITTED. 

G–2 ........ RP11–1495–002 .......................................... Ozark Gas Transmission, L.L.C. 

G–3 ........ RP10–315–002 ............................................ Columbia Gulf Transmission Company. 

G–4 ........ OR07–7–000 ............................................... Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company v. Calnev Pipe Line LLC. 

OR07–18–000 ............................................. America West Airlines, Inc. and US Airways, Inc., Chevron Products Company, Continental Airlines, Inc., Southwest Airlines Co. and Valero Marketing and Supply Company v. Calnev Pipe Line LLC. 

OR07–19–000 ............................................. ConocoPhillips Co. v. Calnev Pipe Line LLC. 

OR07–22–000 ............................................. BP West Coast Products, LLC v. Calnev Pipe Line LLC. 

OR09–15–000 ............................................. Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company v. Calnev Pipe Line LLC. 

OR09–20–000 ............................................. BP West Coast Products, LLC v. Calnev Pipe Line LLC. 

Hydro 

H–1 ........ P–2539–061 ................................................ Erie Boulevard Hydropower, L.P. 

H–2 ........ P–2195–025 ................................................ Portland General Electric Company. 

H–3 ........ P–1390–063 ................................................ Southern California Edison Company. 

Certificates 

C–1 ........ OMITTED. 

C–2 ........ CP10–492–000 ............................................ Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC. 

C–3 ........ OMITTED. 

C–4 ........ CP10–22–000 .............................................. Magnum Gas Storage, LLC, Magnum Solutions, LLC. 

C–5 ........ CP10–486–000 ............................................ Colorado Interstate Gas Company. 

Issued: March 10, 2011. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

A free Webcast of this event is 

available through http://www.ferc.gov. 

Anyone with Internet access who 

desires to view this event can do so by 

navigating to http://www.ferc.gov’s 

Calendar of Events and locating this 

event in the Calendar. The event will 

contain a link to its Webcast. The 

Capitol Connection provides technical 

support for the free Webcasts. It also 

offers access to this event via television 

in the DC area and via phone bridge for 

a fee. If you have any questions, visit 

http://www.CapitolConnection.org or 

contact Danelle Springer or David 

Reininger at 703–993–3100. 

Immediately following the conclusion 

of the Commission Meeting, a press 

briefing will be held in the Commission 

Meeting Room. Members of the public 

may view this briefing in the designated 

overflow room. This statement is 

intended to notify the public that the 

press briefings that follow Commission 

meetings may now be viewed remotely 

at Commission headquarters, but will 

not be telecast through the Capitol 

Connection service. 

[FR Doc. 2011–6067 Filed 3–11–11; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–0199; FRL–9280–6] 

Notice of Receipt of Petition From the 

Government of Canada for Application 

of the Renewable Fuel Standard 

Aggregate Compliance Approach 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: EPA is issuing notice of 

receipt of a petition for EPA to authorize 

the use of an aggregate approach for 

compliance with the Renewable Fuel 

Standard renewable biomass provisions. 

This petition was submitted by the 

Government of Canada. The petition 

requests that EPA determine that an 

aggregate compliance approach will 

provide reasonable assurance that 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
14008 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 50 / Tuesday, March 15, 2011 / Notices 

planted crops and crop residue from 

Canada meet the definition of renewable 

biomass. EPA has previously 

determined that the aggregate 

compliance approach is applicable in 

the United States. If the petition is 

approved, crops and crop residue from 

Canada would not be subject to 

individual recordkeeping and reporting 

requirements. This determination could 

change if EPA later determined, through 

its annual evaluation of the aggregate 

compliance approach, that the number 

of acres of agricultural land in Canada 

exceeded a baseline number of acres 

determined to be available under the 

Act for the production of crops and crop 

residue meeting the definition of 

renewable biomass. In this notice, EPA 

is soliciting comment on all aspects of 

the petition. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before May 16, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 

OAR–2011–0199, by one of the 

following methods: 

• http://www.regulations.gov: Follow 

the on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• E-mail: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov. 

• Fax: (202)566–1741. 

• Mail: Air and Radiation Docket, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Mailcode: 6102T, 1200 Pennsylvania 

Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460. 

Please include a total of two copies. 

• Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center, 

Public Reading Room, EPA West 

Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460. 

Such deliveries are only accepted 

during the Docket’s normal hours of 

operation, and special arrangements 

should be made for deliveries of boxed 

information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2011– 

0199. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through http:// 

www.regulations.gov. The http:// 

www.regulations.gov Web site is an 

‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an e-mail comment directly 

to EPA without going through http:// 

www.regulations.gov your e-mail 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. For additional information 

about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA 

Docket Center homepage at http:// 

www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. 

Docket: The complete petition and all 

supporting materials are available for 

public review in the docket. All 

documents in the docket are listed in 

the http://www.regulations.gov index. 

Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

e.g., CBI or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, will be publicly 

available only in hard copy. Publicly 

available docket materials are available 

either electronically in http:// 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Air and Radiation Docket, EPA/DC, 

EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, 

DC. The Public Reading Room is open 

from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The telephone number for the 

Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, 

and the telephone number for the Air 

and Radiation Docket is (202) 566–1741. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Meg 

McCarthy, Office of Transportation and 

Air Quality, Mailcode: 6406J, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, 

DC 20460; telephone number: (202)343– 

9968; fax number: (202)343–2802; email address: mccarthy.meg@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

(A) Request for Comments 

On January 31, 2011, the Government 

of Canada submitted a petition to the 

Administrator pursuant to 40 CFR 

80.1457 requesting approval of an 

aggregate approach for compliance with 

the Renewable Fuel Standard renewable 

biomass provisions for planted crops 

and crop residue from Canada. This 

petition has been placed in the public 

docket. 

The petition requests that EPA 

determine that an aggregate compliance 

approach will provide reasonable 

assurance that planted crops and crop 

residue from Canada meet the definition 

of renewable biomass and will continue 

to meet the definition of renewable 

biomass, and thus will not be subject to 

individual recordkeeping and reporting 

requirements unless EPA determines 

through an annual evaluation that more 

acres are planted to crops and crop 

residue than are permissible consistent 

with the definition of renewable 

biomass. EPA solicits comments and 

information to assist the Administrator 

in making a determination concerning 

the petition. 

(B) Background on the Petition Process 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 80.1457, EPA may 

approve a petition for application of the 

aggregate compliance approach in a 

foreign country if it finds that such an 

approach will provide reasonable 

assurance that planted crops and crop 

residue from the petitioning country 

meet the definition of renewable 

biomass, and will continue to meet the 

definition of renewable biomass, as 

demonstrated through the submission of 

credible, reliable, and verifiable data. As 

part of its evaluation of the petition, 

EPA will consider several factors, 

including: 

• Whether there has been a 

reasonable identification of the ‘‘2007 

baseline area of land,’’ defined as the 

total amount of cropland, pastureland, 

and land that is equivalent to U.S. 

Conservation Reserve Program land in 

the country in question that was 

actively managed or fallow and 

nonforested on December 19, 2007, 

taking into account the definitions of 

terms such as ‘‘cropland,’’ ‘‘pastureland,’’ 

‘‘planted crop,’’ and ‘‘crop residue’’ 

included in the final RFS2 regulations. 

• Whether information on the total 

amount of cropland, pastureland, and 

land that is equivalent to U.S. 

Conservation Reserve Program land in 

the country in question for years 

preceding and following calendar year 

2007 shows that the 2007 baseline area 

of land is not likely to be exceeded in 

the future. 

• Whether economic considerations, 

legal constraints, historical land use and 

agricultural practices and other factors 

show that it is likely that producers of 

planted crops and crop residue will 

continue to use agricultural land within 

the 2007 baseline area of land identified 

into the future, as opposed to clearing 

and cultivating land not included in the 

2007 baseline area of land. 

• Whether there is a reliable method 

to evaluate, on an annual basis, if the 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 50 / Tuesday, March 15, 2011 / Notices 14009 

2007 baseline area of land is being or 

has been exceeded. 

• Whether a credible and reliable 

entity has been identified to conduct 

data gathering and analysis, including 

annual identification of the aggregate 

amount of cropland, pastureland, and 

land that is equivalent to U.S. 

Conservation Reserve Program land, that 

is needed for an annual EPA evaluation 

of the aggregate compliance approach, 

and whether the data, analyses, and 

methodologies are publicly available. 

• Whether the petition submission 

requirements specified in 40 CFR 

80.1457(b) have been satisfied, 

including the submission of a letter 

signed by a national government 

representative at the ministerial level or 

equivalent confirming that the petition 

and all supporting data have been 

reviewed and verified by the ministry 

(or ministries) or department(s) of the 

national government with primary 

expertise in agricultural land use 

patterns, practices, data, and statistics of 

the country in question, that the data 

support a finding that planted crops and 

crop residue from the specified country 

meet the definition of renewable 

biomass and will continue to meet the 

definition of renewable biomass, and 

that the responsible national 

government ministry (or ministries) or 

department(s) will review and verify the 

data submitted on an annual basis to 

facilitate EPA’s annual assessment of 

the 2007 baseline area of land. 

The public is specifically invited to 

comment on these factors, whether 

Canada has met all submission 

requirements specified in the 

regulations, and on any other issue that 

could inform EPA’s evaluation of the 

petition. 

Dated: March 10, 2011. 

Margo Tsirigotis Oge, 

Director, Office of Transportation and Air 

Quality, Office of Air and Radiation. 

[FR Doc. 2011–6033 Filed 3–14–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE U.S. 

[Public Notice 2011–0051] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Final Collection; Comment 

Request 

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the U.S. 

ACTION: Submission for OMB review and 

comments request. 

Form Title: Report of Overdue 

Accounts Under Short-Term Policies 

EIB 92–27. 

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of 

the United States (Ex-Im Bank), as a part 

of its continuing effort to reduce 

paperwork and respondent burden, 

invites the general public and other 

Federal Agencies to comment on the 

proposed information collection, as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995. 

The collection provides Ex-Im Bank 

staff with the information necessary to 

monitor the borrower’s payments for 

exported goods covered under its short 

and medium-term export credit 

insurance policies. It also alerts Ex-Im 

Bank staff of defaults, so they can 

manage the portfolio in an informed 

manner. 

Form can be viewed at http://

www.exim.gov/pub/pending/

EIB92_27.pdf. 

DATES: Comments should be received on 

or before May 16, 2011 to be assured of 

consideration. 

ADDRESSES: Comments maybe submitted 

electronically on http:// 

www.regulations.gov or by mail to 

Michele Kuester, Export-Import Bank of 

the United States, 811 Vermont Ave., 

NW., Washington, DC 20571. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Titles and Form Number: EIB 92–27. 

Report of Overdue Accounts Under 

Short-Term Policies. 

OMB Number: 3048–0027. 

Type of Review: Regular. 

Need and Use: The collection 

provides Ex-Im Bank staff with the 

information necessary to monitor the 

borrower’s payments for exported goods 

covered under its short- and mediumterm export credit insurance policies. It 

also alerts Ex-Im Bank staff of defaults, 

so they can manage the portfolio in an 

informed manner. 

Affected Public: This form affects 

entities involved in the export of U.S 

goods and services. 

Annual Number of Respondents: 396. 

Estimated Time per Respondent: 15 

minutes. 

Government Annual Burden Hours: 

33 hours. 

Frequency of Reporting or Use: 

Monthly. 

Sharon A. Whitt, 

Agency Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2011–5941 Filed 3–14–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6690–01–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

[DA 11–453] 

Federal Advisory Committee Act; 

Technological Advisory Council 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of public meeting. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Federal Advisory Committee Act, this 

notice advises interested persons that 

the Federal Communications 

Commission’s (FCC) Technological 

Advisory Council will hold a meeting 

on Wednesday, March 30, 2011 in the 

Commission Meeting Room, from 1 p.m. 

to 4 p.m. at the Federal 

Communications Commission, 445 12th 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. 

DATES: March 30, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications 

Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20554. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Walter Johnston, Chief, Electromagnetic 

Compatibility Division, 202–418–0807; 

Walter.Johnston@FCC.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Technical 

Advisory Council members have been 

prioritizing and further developing 

technology issues discussed at the 

initial meeting on November 4, 2011. 

The Technical Advisory Council 

members will discuss this work, outline 

progress to date and discuss possible 

further work. The FCC will attempt to 

accommodate as many people as 

possible. However, admittance will be 

limited to seating availability. Meetings 

are also broadcast live with open 

captioning over the internet from the 

FCC Live Web page at http:// 

www.fcc.gov/live/. The public may 

submit written comments before the 

meeting to: Walter Johnston, the FCC’s 

Designated Federal Officer for 

Technological Advisory Council by email: Walter.Johnston@fcc.gov or U.S. 

Postal Service Mail (Walter Johnston, 

Federal Communications Commission, 

Room 2–A665, 445 12th Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20554). Open 

captioning will be provided for this 

event. Other reasonable 

accommodations for people with 

disabilities are available upon request. 

Requests for such accommodations 

should be submitted via e-mail to 

fcc504@fcc.gov or by calling the Office 

of Engineering and Technology at 202– 

418–2470 (voice), (202) 418–1944 (fax). 

Such requests should include a detailed 

description of the accommodation 

needed. In addition, please include your 

contact information. Please allow at 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES