alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §4002. Congressional statement of purpose

The purpose of this chapter is to—

(1) strengthen the competitive position of the United States commercial fishing industry in the domestic and international marketplace;

(2) encourage the development and utilization of all species of fish available for harvest by the United States fishing industry;

(3) encourage the utilization of domestically-produced fish through enhancement of markets, promotion, and public relations;

(4) help the United States fishing industry develop methods to improve quality and efficiency in the marketplace;

(5) educate and inform consumers on the use of fish;

(6) develop better coordination of fisheries marketing and promotion activities with commercial fisheries research and development programs; and

(7) educate and inform the public about the nutritional value of fish in the diet.

(Pub. L. 99–659, title II, §203, Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3716.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title II of Pub. L. 99–659, Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3715, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of title II to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4001 of this title and Tables.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ELFER ANTONIO PINEDA GUZMAN,

Petitioner,

 v.

ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting

Attorney General,

Respondent.

Nos. 18-71036

19-70934

Agency No. A201-153-764

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 4, 2021** 

San Francisco, California

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and IKUTA and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Elfer Pineda Guzman, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review

of two orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his claim for

FILED

FEB 8 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT) and denying his motion to

reopen his case based on new evidence. 

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the Petition for

Review. Because the parties are familiar with the history of this case, we need not

recount it here.

I

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of relief under the CAT. 

See Avendano-Hernandez v. Lynch, 800 F.3d 1072, 1078 (9th Cir. 2015) (stating

substantial evidence standard). To obtain CAT relief, an applicant must show he is

“more likely than not” to be tortured with government acquiescence upon removal. 

8 C.F.R. § 208.16(c)(2); Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1053 (9th Cir. 2009). 

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that the recruitment attempts,

robberies, and threats that Pineda Guzman and his family have experienced at the

hands of Mara Salvatrucha (MS-13), Mara 18, and unidentified gang members do

not demonstrate that Pineda Guzman would more likely than not be tortured upon

removal to Honduras.

II

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Pineda Guzman’s motion to

reopen. See Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010) (stating abuse

2
of discretion standard). New evidence presented in a motion to reopen must be

material, must have been unavailable at the former hearing, and must be “likely

[to] change the result in the case.” Young Sun Shin v. Mukasey, 547 F.3d 1019,

1025 (9th Cir. 2008); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1). However, the BIA has “discretion

to deny a motion to reopen even if the party moving has made out a prima facie

case for relief.” 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a). 

The BIA reasonably concluded that Pineda Guzman’s proffered evidence of

a new threat against his brother and MS-13’s recent political activity would not

likely change the outcome of his case. Its decision to deny Pineda Guzman’s

motion to reopen was therefore not “arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law.” Singh

v. INS, 295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir. 2002) (quoting Ahwazi v. INS, 751 F.2d

1120, 1122 (9th Cir. 1985)).

PETITION DENIED.

3
#### § 35.162 Telephone emergency services.

Telephone emergency services, including 911 services, shall provide direct access to individuals who use TDD's and computer modems.
#### § 5.800 Ten-day filing requirement.

The 10-day filing requirement provided by section 8(g) of the Act shall be deemed satisfied if the amendment to the registration statement is deposited in the U.S. mails no later than the 10th day of the period.
Exhibit  32.1


                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR
                     RULE 15d-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SEC.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  quarterly  report  of  Sharp Holding Corporation (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
George  Sharp,  Chief  Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that:

     (1)  Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
requirements  of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

     (2)  Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  information  contained  in  the Report
fairly  presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of  operations  of  the  Company.

Date:     NOVEMBER 17, 2004

/S/  GEORGE  SHARP
------------------
GEORGE  SHARP
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF SHARP HOLDING CORPORATION


                                       22
<PAGE>
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 40 

Expressing the sense of Congress that undue restrictions on the right of 

law-abiding gun owners to carry a firearm for self-defense outside of 

the home violate the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the 

United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 23, 2020 

Mrs. LOEFFLER submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that undue restrictions 

on the right of law-abiding gun owners to carry a firearm 

for self-defense outside of the home violate the Second 

Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. 

Whereas the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the 

United States (referred to in this preamble as the ‘‘Second Amendment’’) states, ‘‘[a] well regulated Militia, 

being necessary to the security of a free State, the right 

of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.’’; 

Whereas the right to ‘‘bear Arms’’, in plain language, means 

the right to carry arms; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 40 IS 

Whereas, based on this plain language, the Second Amendment clearly provides individual citizens with a right to 

carry arms for the purpose of self-defense; 

Whereas the Supreme Court of the United States has held 

that the Second Amendment is incorporated under the 

Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States and thereby protects the right of an individual 

under the Second Amendment from infringement by 

State and local governments; 

Whereas several States have enacted laws that unduly inhibit 

and infringe upon the rights of a law-abiding individual 

to carry a firearm outside of the home, unless the individual can demonstrate a special need to carry the firearm; 

Whereas these State laws are inconsistent with the plain 

meaning of the right to bear arms and the rights granted 

to individuals by the Second Amendment; and 

Whereas established Federal processes and procedures regulating the right to purchase and possess a firearm are 

sufficient to provide for the interests of public safety: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that undue 

3 restrictions on the right of law-abiding gun owners to 

4 carry a firearm for self-defense outside of the home— 

5 (1) violate both— 

6 (A) the intent of the Founding Fathers, as 

7 expressed by James Madison in The Federalist 

8 No. 46; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•SCON 40 IS 

1 (B) the clear meaning of the Second 

2 Amendment to the Constitution of the United 

3 States ‘‘to keep and bear Arms’’; and 

4 (2) are unlawful infringements of the rights 

5 granted by the Second Amendment to the Constitu6 tion of the United States. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 10.27

                       AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         Reference is made to the Employment Agreement entered into as of
February 11, 1999 between Cytation.com Incorporated and Richard A. Fisher (the
"Employment Agreement"). The Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

         1. The definition of "INITIAL TERM" in Section 1 of the Employment
Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:

                  "INITIAL TERM" means the four (4) year period beginning on the
                  Employment Date and ending on the fourth anniversary thereof.

         2. The vesting period for the stock options described in Section 3(c)
of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended so that 1/24th of such options
vest each month during the continued employment of Mr. Fisher, commencing as of
the date of the grant of such option.

         The Employment Agreement, as amended hereby, is ratified and confirmed.

         IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as
of November 11, 1999.

                                            CYTATION.COM INCORPORATED


                                            By: /s/ Thomas J. Burgess
                                            Name:  Thomas J. Burgess
                                            Title: President


                                            /s/ Richard A. Fisher
                                            Richard A. Fisher
§ 28.24 Exceptions based on the results of judicial proceedings. Subsection (c) of section 3600A makes the biological evidence preservation requirement inapplicable in two circumstances relating to the results of judicial proceedings: ( a ) *Judicial denial of DNA testing.* Section 3600A(c)(1) exempts situations in which a court has denied a motion for DNA testing under 18 U.S.C. 3600 and no appeal is pending.
( b ) *Inclusion of defendant as source.* Section 3600A(c)(5) exempts situations in which there has been DNA testing under 18 U.S.C. 3600 and the results included the defendant as the source of the evidence.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       1,522,418
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         457,702
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               179,692
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                98,638
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  3,389,967
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      9,517,797
<ALLOWANCE>                                    129,259
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,676,201
<DEPOSITS>                                  10,228,782
<SHORT-TERM>                                 3,509,888
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            332,477
<LONG-TERM>                                    363,952
<COMMON>                                        53,340
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    180,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     912,436
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              15,676,201
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                776,226
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              226,245
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                57,947
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,064,260
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             358,586
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             581,709
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          482,551
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   42,995
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              23,379
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                560,103
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                217,726
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     147,551
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   147,551
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    22.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    22.13
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.75
<LOANS-NON>                                     50,503
<LOANS-PAST>                                    28,302
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 2,059
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               124,734
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   61,967
<RECOVERIES>                                    23,497
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              129,259
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            98,482
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         30,777
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 2,
2010 of the Company, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Robert W. HumphreysRobert W. HumphreysChairman and Chief Executive Officer
§ 34.105 Peer review methods. ( a ) For both competitive and noncompetitive applications, peer review will normally consist of written comments provided in response to the general selection criteria established under subpart A of this part and any program specific selection criteria identified in the program announcement or otherwise established by the Administrator, together with the assignment of numerical values. Peer review may be conducted at meetings with peer reviewers held under OJJDP oversight, through mail reviews, or a combination of both. When advisable, site visits may also be employed. The method of peer review anticipated for each announced competitive program, including the evaluation criteria to be used by peer reviewers, will be specified in each program announcement.
( b ) When peer review is conducted through meetings, peer review panelists will be gathered together for instruction by OJJDP, including review of the OJJDP “Peer Review Guideline”. OJJDP will oversee the conduct of individual and group review sessions, as appropriate. When time or other factors preclude the convening of a peer review panel, mail reviews will be used. For competitive programs, mail reviews will be used only where the Administrator makes a written determination of necessity.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Pamela J. Montpelier, hereby certify that:



(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Service Bancorp, Inc.;



(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



(4) The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



(5) The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ PAMELA J. MONTPELIER
|Pamela J. Montpelier    
|Chief Executive Officer 
|February 10, 2005
CS 315822-F 04/28/2020

cdc.gov/coronavirus

Si vous êtes suspect ou confirmé positif au COVID-19 :

6. En cas de toux ou 

d’éternuement, couvrezvous la bouche et le nez.

2. Surveillez attentivement 

vos symptômes. Si vos 

symptômes empirent, 

appelez votre fournisseur 

de soins de santé 

immédiatement. 

4. Si vous avez un rendez-vous 

dans un centre de santé, 

appelez le professionnel de 

santé concerné en avance 

pour lui dire que vous êtes 

atteint ou peut-être atteint du 

COVID-19.

7. Lavez-vous souvent les mains 

avec de l’eau savonneuse 

pendant au moins 20 secondes, 

ou lavez-vous les mains avec 

un désinfectant pour les mains 

à base d’alcool qui contient au 

moins 60 % d’alcool. 

8. Restez autant que possible dans 

une pièce spécifique, isolée des 

autres personnes vivant sous 

votre toit. Utilisez une salle de 

bain séparée si vous le pouvez. 

Si vous devez être proche d’autres 

personnes, à la maison ou audehors, portez un masque facial.

1. Restez chez vous, n’allez 

pas au travail ou à l’école. 

Évitez également les autres 

lieux publics. Si vous devez 

sortir, évitez les transports en 

communs, le covoiturage et 

les taxis.

9. Évitez de partager des objets 

personnels avec d’autres 

membres de votre foyer, par 

exemple des assiettes, des 

serviettes ou de la literie.

3. Reposez-vous et restez 

hydraté(e). 

10. Nettoyez toutes les surfaces

souvent touchées telles que 

les comptoirs, les dessus de 

table ou encore les poignées 

de porte. Nettoyez à l’aide 

de sprays ou de lingettes de 

nettoyage ménager, selon les 

instructions sur l’étiquette. 

5. Si vous êtes en situation 

d’urgence médicale, 

appelez le 911 et informez 

la personne avec qui vous 

parlez que vous avez, ou 

avez peut-être, le COVID-19.

10 choses que vous pouvez faire pour atténuer 

vos symptômes dus au COVID-19 chez vous
§ 115.51 Inmate reporting. ( a ) The agency shall provide multiple internal ways for inmates to privately report sexual abuse and sexual harassment, retaliation by other inmates or staff for reporting sexual abuse and sexual harassment, and staff neglect or violation of responsibilities that may have contributed to such incidents.
( b ) The agency shall also provide at least one way for inmates to report abuse or harassment to a public or private entity or office that is not part of the agency, and that is able to receive and immediately forward inmate reports of sexual abuse and sexual harassment to agency officials, allowing the inmate to remain anonymous upon request. Inmates detained solely for civil immigration purposes shall be provided information on how to contact relevant consular officials and relevant officials at the Department of Homeland Security.
( c ) Staff shall accept reports made verbally, in writing, anonymously, and from third parties and shall promptly document any verbal reports.
( d ) The agency shall provide a method for staff to privately report sexual abuse and sexual harassment of inmates.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 27, 2016

s0120 

# Order

Clerk January 27, 2016

152292

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 152292

COA: 321317

Wayne CC: 13

- 011629

- FH

JERRELL DEONTE GRIFFEN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 16, 2015

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED , because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.