alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                                                     March 25, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC  20549

Dear Sir or Madam:

The annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 (the
"Report") of Motient Corporation (the "Issuer") with which this letter is being
filed as an exhibit includes the Issuer's financial statements that were audited
by Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen"). Andersen has been the Issuer's auditor
since the Issuer's formation in 1988.

Andersen has represented to the Issuer that the audit with respect to the
financial statements included in the Report was subject to Andersen's quality
control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide
reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with
professional standards and that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen
personnel working on audits, and availability of national office consultation to
conduct the relevant portions of the audit.

                                    Very truly yours,

                                    MOTIENT CORPORATION

                                    By:     /s/ David H. Engvall
                                            -------------------
                                            Name:  David H. Engvall
                                            Title:  Vice President, General
                                                    Counsel and Secretary

                                     Page 1
Spreading germs is OUT. Handwashing is IN!

Handwashing is one of the most important things we can do to avoid getting sick and spreading germs to others.

www.cdc.gov/handwashing CS267337-A

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-02T03:10:06-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
§ 29.9 Motor vehicles for hire. ( a ) Any person who is in the business of renting or leasing motor vehicles and who rents or leases a motor vehicle on which a program decal or device is affixed shall notify the person to whom the motor vehicle is rented or leased about the program, prior to transferring possession of the vehicle.
( b ) The notice required by this section shall be printed in bold type in the rental or lease agreement, and on the envelope in which the rental agreement is placed. The notice provision in the rental or lease agreement must utilize a larger font than the standard type in the agreement. The notice must state that the motor vehicle may be stopped by law enforcement officials if it is operated under the conditions specified by the program in which the car is enrolled even if the officials have no other basis for believing that the vehicle is being operated unlawfully.
( c ) Failure to provide the notice required by this section to a renter or lessee may result in the assessment of a civil penalty by the Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, or his or her designee, of an amount not to exceed $5,000. No penalty shall be assessed unless the person charged has been given notice and an opportunity for a hearing of such charge.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 956 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 956

   To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require the 
                      disclosure of all donations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 28, 2019

  Mr. Merkley introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
         referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require the 
                      disclosure of all donations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Brighter Sunshine on Donations 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIRING DISCLOSURE OF ALL DONATIONS.

    (a) Independent Expenditures.--Section 304(c)(2)(C) of the Federal 
Election Campaign Act of 1971 (52 U.S.C. 30104(c)(2)(C)) is amended by 
striking ``which was made for the purpose of furthering an independent 
expenditure'' and inserting ``(without regard to whether such 
contribution was made for the purpose of furthering an independent 
expenditure)''.
    (b) Electioneering Communications.--Section 304(f)(2) of such Act 
(52 U.S.C. 30104(f)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence of subparagraph (E), by inserting 
        ``(determined without regard to whether the contributions were 
        made for the purpose of furthering an electioneering 
        communication)'' after ``disclosure date'', and
            (2) in subparagraph (F), by inserting ``(determined without 
        regard to whether the contributions were made for the purpose 
        of furthering an electioneering communication)'' after 
        ``disclosure date''.
                                 <all>
```
### §192b–1. Exchange of lands

Upon submission of satisfactory evidence of title the Secretary of the Interior is authorized, in his discretion, to accept title on behalf of the United States to the following described land conveyed to William W. Kiskadden by warranty deed numbered 174403 from Mrs. Arah Chapman, recorded August 24, 1916, in book 339, page 231, records of Larimer County, Colorado: Beginning at the northeast corner of the southwest quarter of section 31, township 5 north, range 73 west, sixth principal meridian, Colorado; thence south four hundred and eighty feet; thence west two hundred feet; thence north 27 degrees 30 minutes west five hundred and forty-one feet; thence east four hundred and fifty feet to the place of beginning, containing approximately three and fifty-eight one-hundredths acres, and in exchange therefor to issue a patent for that portion of the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter and that portion of the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of section 31, township 5 north, range 73 west, sixth principal meridian, Colorado, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point from whence the center quarter-section corner of section 31 bears south 79 degrees no minutes east, three hundred and sixty and nine-tenths feet; thence south four hundred and eighty feet to a point from whence the east quarter corner of section 31 bears north 79 degrees 22 minutes east, two thousand six hundred and seventy-three and six-tenths feet; thence west two hundred feet; thence north 27 degrees 30 minutes west, five hundred and forty-one feet; thence east four hundred and fifty feet to the point of beginning, containing approximately three and five-tenths acres: Provided, That the land conveyed to the United States, other than the land to be patented, shall, upon acceptance of title thereto, become a part of the Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado, and become subject to all laws and regulations applicable to said park.

(July 14, 1945, ch. 296, 59 Stat. 466.)
§ 13.6 Criteria for reward. ( a ) Information provided by any person to the United States for a reward under the Atomic Weapons and Special Nuclear Materials Rewards Act must be original, and must concern the unlawful: ( 1 ) Introduction, manufacture or acquisition, or
( 2 ) Attempted introduction, manufacture or acquisition of, or
( 3 ) Export or attempt to export, or
( 4 ) Conspiracy to introduce, manufacture, acquire or export special nuclear material or atomic weapons, or
( 5 ) Loss, diversion or disposal or special nuclear material or atomic weapons.
( b ) The amount of the reward shall depend on: ( 1 ) The amount of the material recovered or potentially recoverable, and the role the information played in the recovery, and
( 2 ) The danger the material posed or poses to the common defense and security or public health and welfare, and
( 3 ) The difficulty in ascertaining the information submitted to claim the reward, and the quality of the information, and
( 4 ) Any other considerations which the Attorney General or the intra-departmental committee deems necessary or helpful to the individual determination.
#### BALDWIN, guardian, *v.*SHIELDS.

There can be no valid judgment of foreclosure of a materialman’s lien for material furnished to a contractor upon the real estate improved with such *material, in the absence*of a valid judgment in favor of the materialman against the contractor for the price of such material. In a suit for the foreclosure of such a lien, where *no*personal judgment is sought, and the petition fails to allege that the plaintiff has a judgment against the contracto!', and where the contractor is not a party to the fox-eclosure suit, it is erroneous to refuse to dismiss the petition on general demurrer.

March 18, 1910.

Foreclosure of lien. Before Judge Worrill. Terrell superior court.

June 14, 1909.

*E. A. Wilkinson,*for plaintiff in error.

*M. O. Edwards*and *James G.*Parks, contra.

Atkinson, J.

The suit, as amended, was for the foreclosure of an .alleged materialman’s lien, to collect the price of certain material furnished to a contractor for the improvement of real estate. As amended, the petition did not seek to recover a personal judgment against either the contractor or the owner of the land. The contractor was not a party to the suit; nor was it alleged that the plaintiff had procured a judgment against the contractor. It was essential to the cause of action that a valid judgment against the contractor should previously have been obtained, or that he be proceeded against in the foreclosure suit concurrently with *222the owner of the land. *Mauck*v., *Rosser,*126 *Ga.*268 (55 S. E. 32). See also *Pike Brothers Lumber Co.*v. *Mitchell,*132 *Ga.*675 (64 S. E. 998). As the petition omitted allegations as to these •essential matters, it failed to set forth facts which entitled the plaintiff to a judgment of foreclosure, which was the only relief sought. It was, therefore, subject to general demurrer, and the court erred in refusing to dismiss the petition. In the brief of •counsel for the defendant in error it was conceded that the contractor was a necessary party, but it was insisted that the point was not raised in the court below. There were several grounds of demurrer, some of them being subdivided into statements of various specific reasons why the petition showed on its face that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover; but there was also a demurrer which, in substance, complained generally that the petition should be dismissed because it failed to set forth a cause of action against the defendant. There was no attempt to set forth any cause of action other-than one for a statutory foreclosure, of a materialman’s lien; and as the allegations were insufficient' to state a cause of action of that character, it was open to the general demurrer, and the question upon which the reversal is had could not be disregarded by the trial court on the ground that it was not raised.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, C. J., absent.*
§ 2.33 Release plans. ( a ) A grant of parole is conditioned upon the approval of release plans by the Regional Commissioner. In general, the following factors are considered as elements in the prisoner's release plan: ( 1 ) Availability of legitimate employment and an approved residence for the prospective parolee; and
( 2 ) Availability of necessary aftercare for a parolee who is ill or who requires special care.
( b ) Generally, parolees will be released only to the place of their legal residence unless the Commission is satisfied that another place of residence will serve the public interest more effectively or will improve the probability of the applicant's readjustment.
( c ) Where the circumstances warrant, the Commission on its own motion, or upon recommendation of the probation officer, may require that an advisor who is a responsible, reputable, and law-abiding citizen living in or near the community in which the releasee will reside be available to the releasee. Such advisor shall serve under the direction of and in cooperation with the probation officer to whom the parolee is assigned.
( d ) When the prisoner has an unsatisfied fine or restitution order, a reasonable plan for payment [or performance of services, if so ordered by the court] shall, where feasible, be included in the parole release plan.
[42 FR 39809, Aug. 5, 1977; 42 FR 44234, Sept. 2, 1977, as amended at 50 FR 36422, Sept. 6, 1985; 68 FR 41530, July 14, 2003]
| **FORM 4**                                                                                                                                               | UNITED STATES SECURITIES        AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION        Washington, D.C. 20549                                                                                                                                                                                 | OMB      APPROVAL                                                                                                                                                       |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| **   **        Check this box if no longer subject to Section 16. Form 4 or Form 5 obligations        may continue. See Instruction 1(b). | **STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP**

Filed pursuant to        Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Section 17(a) of        the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 or Section 30(h) of the        Investment Company Act of 1940 | OMB      Number: 3235-0287      Expires: January 31, 2005      Estimated average burden      hours per response. . .0.5
Filed By Romeo & Dye's Instant Form 4 Filer |
| (1) | The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: November 9, 2011 |  /s/ Mark R. Baker                                                                  |
|------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   | Mark R. BakerChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)                  |
|                   |                                                                                     |
|                   |                                                                                     |
|                   |  /s/ Robert A. McKinney                                                             |
|                   | Robert A. McKinney, CPAChief Financial Officer(Principal Finance and Accounting Officer) |
#### Anthony Corpolongo et al., Respondents, v. Trailways of New England, Inc., et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., TJntermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 24 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Whereas the Food and Nutrition Service was founded on August 8, 1969, and has worked in a public-private partnership to reduce food insecurity and promote nutritious 

diets among the people of the United States; 

Whereas the Food and Nutrition Service partners with State 

and local governments, Tribal organizations, school systems, nonprofit organizations, private sector companies, 

and faith-based organizations— 

(1) to address hunger, poverty, and nutrition; and 

(2) to provide support to over 36,000,000 people in 

the United States who live in households that face hunger on a daily basis; 

Whereas the Food and Nutrition Service administers 15 nutrition assistance programs that leverage the agricultural 

abundance of the United States to ensure that children, 

seniors, and low-income individuals and families have access to nutritious food; 

Whereas the programs of the Food and Nutrition Service 

reach 1 in 4 people in the United States each year; 

Whereas it is the mission of Food and Nutrition Service to 

increase food security and reduce hunger while maintaining the integrity and efficiency of programs that provide 
2 

†SCON 24 ES 

nutrition assistance to the people of the United States 

when those people are in need; and 

Whereas the Food and Nutrition Service co-develops the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, which provide sciencebased nutrition recommendations and serve as the cornerstone of Federal nutrition policy: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), that Congress— 

3 (1) recognizes the valuable historic and contin4 ued contributions of the Food and Nutrition Service 

5 and the employees of the Food and Nutrition Service 

6 to the nutrition, health, and well-being of the people 

7 of the United States; 

8 (2) commends the partnership efforts of States, 

9 territories, local governments, Tribal organizations, 

10 school systems, nonprofit charitable organizations, 

11 private sector companies, and community-based or12 ganizations to end hunger and provide nutritious 

13 food to the people of the United States; 

14 (3) encourages continued efforts— 

15 (A) to educate the people of the United 

16 States on the importance of eating nutritiously; 

17 and 

18 (B) to provide nutrition assistance to all 

19 people of the United States when those people 

20 are in need; 
3 

†SCON 24 ES 

1 (4) recognizes that the Food and Nutrition 

2 Service uses the bounty of the farmers and ranchers 

3 of the United States to reduce food insecurity; and 

4 (5) recognizes and reaffirms the commitment of 

5 the United States to— 

6 (A) ending hunger in the United States; 

7 and 

8 (B) continuing to lead the world in ending 

9 hunger worldwide. 

Passed the Senate July 31, 2019. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 24 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Nutrition Service of the Department of Agriculture. 

Recognizing the 50th anniversary of the Food and
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Roy D. Hooten, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 304]

Peters, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Breslin, J.), rendered September 28, 2005, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

Waiving his right to appeal, defendant pleaded guilty to attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree. He was thereafter sentenced in accordance with the negotiated plea agreement to a prison term of lVs to 4 years. Defendant now appeals.

We affirm. Defendant argues that County Court erred in sentencing him without appropriately reviewing his mental health history and by possibly considering the criminal history of another person.* However, given defendant’s waiver of appeal, these issues, which do not touch upon the legality of the sentence, are not preserved *(see People v Callahan,*80 NY2d 273, 281 [1992]; *People v Griffin,*17 AD3d 927, 927 [2005]; *People v Rosado,*300 AD2d 838, 840-841 [2002], *lv denied*99 NY2d 619 [2003]; *People v Anonymous,*293 AD2d 374, 374 [2002], *lv denied*98 NY2d 729 [2002]). Defendant’s claims are, in any event, wholly unsubstantiated by the record. Finally, defendant’s appeal waiver also precludes him from requesting that we modify the agreed-upon sentence in the interest of justice *(see People v Lopez,*6 NY3d 248, 255-256 [2006]; *People v Cain,*29 AD3d 1032, 1033 [2006]; *People v Portee,*28 AD3d 802, 803 [2006]).

Mercure, J.E, Spain, Carpinello and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

*

 Apparently, a driving while intoxicated supporting deposition and/or bill of particulars pertaining to a different person and noting that person’s prior criminal convictions was inadvertently submitted to County Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 45 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.45
                                    Agreed to September 24, 2020        

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twenty

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That the Architect of the Capitol is authorized and directed to 
transfer to the custody of the Supreme Court of the United States the 
catafalque which is situated in the crypt beneath the Rotunda of the 
Capitol so that such catafalque may be used in the Supreme Court 
Building in connection with services to be conducted there for the late 
honorable Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Associate Justice of the United States 
Supreme Court. The custody of the catafalque shall then be returned to 
the Architect of the Capitol to be used in connection with such 
services to be conducted in National Statuary Hall.
Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```