alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 50.23 Policy against entering into final settlement agreements or consent decree that are subject to confidentiality provisions and against seeking or concurring in the sealing of such documents. ( a ) It is the policy of the Department of Justice that, in any civil matter in which the Department is representing the interests of the United States or its agencies, it will not enter into final settlement agreements or consent decrees that are subject to confidentiality provisions, nor will it seek or concur in the sealing of such documents. This policy flows from the principle of openness in government and is consistent with the Department's policies regarding openness in judicial proceedings (see 28 CFR 50.9) and the Freedom of Information Act (see Memorandum for Heads of Departments and Agencies from the Attorney General *Re: The Freedom of Information Act (Oct. 4, 1993)).*
( b ) There may be rare circumstances that warrant an exception to this general rule. In determining whether an exception is appropriate, any such circumstances must be considered in the context of the public's strong interest in knowing about the conduct of its Government and expenditure of its resources. The existence of such circumstances must be documented as part of the approval process, and any confidentiality provision must be drawn as narrowly as possible. Non-delegable approval authority to determine that an exception justifies use of a confidentiality provision in, or seeking or concurring in the sealing of, a final settlement or consent decree resides with the relevant Assistant Attorney General or United States Attorney, unless authority to approve the settlement itself lies with a more senior Department official, in which case the more senior official will have such approval authority.
( c ) Regardless of whether particular information is subject to a confidentiality provision or to seal, statutes and regulations may prohibit its disclosure from Department of Justice files. Thus, before releasing any information, Department attorneys should consult all appropriate statutes and regulations (e.g., 5 U.S.C. 552a (Privacy Act); 50 U.S.C. 403-3(c)(6) (concerning intelligence sources and methods), and Execution Order 12958 (concerning national security information). In particular, in matters involving individuals, the Privacy Act regulates disclosure of settlement agreements that have not been made part of the court record.
( d ) The principles set forth in this section are intended to provide guidance to attorneys for the Government and are not intended to create or recognize any legally enforceable right in any person.
[Order No. 2270-99, 64 FR 59122, Nov. 2, 1999]
### 1

September 17, 2010 MEMORANDUM TO: Air Docket EPA- HQ- OAR - 20 10 - 01 33 SUBJECT: Docket Key for Canola - Based Biodiesel Lifecycle GHG Results To facilitate docket navigation , EPA is providing the following directory to lifecycle analysis (LCA) results available on the rulemaking docket. The documents listed below, as well as additional RFS2 - related information, are available at www.regulations.gov under Docket ID: EPA - HQOAR - 20 10 - 01 33 . Subject Heading Docket ID Number Description / Sce nario Lifecycle GHG Inputs / Results EPA- HQ- OAR - 20 10 - 01 33 - 0049 Memorandum describing inputs and spreadsheets that calculate lifecycle GHG emissions reductions EPA- HQ- OAR - 2010 - 0133 - 0049.1 Memorandum describing information on the key input assumptions used for modeling the canola oil biodiesel lifecycle pathway EPA- HQ- OAR - 2010 - 0133 - 0049.2 S preadsheet integrat ing results from all stages of the fuel lifecycle to calculate canola - based biodiesel lifecycle GHG emissions EPA- HQ- OAR - 2010 - 0133 - 0049.3 S pre adsheet calculat ing GHG emissions per unit of canola - based biodiesel. The only piece of the lifecycle analysis not calculated in this spreadsheet is the emissions from international land use change. EPA- HQ- OAR - 2010 - 0133 - 0049.4 This spreadsheet includes raw results from the FASOM model EPA- HQ- OAR - 2010 - 0133 - 0049.5 S preadsheet includ ing results from the FASOM model converted into the format needed to calculate domestic agricultural sector and land use

### 2

Subject Heading Docket ID Number Description / Sce nario change GHG calculations EPA- HQ- OAR - 2010 - 0133 - 0049.6 S preadsheet includ ing raw results from the FAPRI - CARD model for a canola oil biodiesel scenario EPA- HQ- OAR - 2010 - 0133 - 0049.7 S preadsheet includ ing EPA’s calculations to convert the raw FAPRI - CARD model results data into differences between scenarios to de termine biofuel - induced GHG emissions impacts EPA- HQ- OAR - 2010 - 0133 - 0049.8 Excel - based model used to perform EPA’s stochastic analysis of international land use change GHG emissions impacts induced by canola based biodiesel EPA- HQ- OAR - 2010 - 0133 - 0049.9 S preadsheet includ ing data about agricultural fertilizer inputs in foreign countries EPA- HQ- OAR - 2010 - 0133 - 0049.10 S preadsheet includ ing data about agricultural energy use in foreign countries EPA- HQ- OAR - 2010 - 0133 - 0049.11 S preadsheet includ ing data about rice methane emissions in foreign countries
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pear Network,  Inc., on Form
10-QSB for the period ending  December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the  "REPORT"),  the  undersigned,
Christopher C. Corwin,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ Christopher C. Corwin
Christopher C. Corwin
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §2641. Voluntary guidelines

The Secretary may prescribe voluntary guidelines respecting the standards established by sections 2621(d) and 2623(b) of this title. Such guidelines may not expand the scope or legal effect of such standards or establish additional standards respecting electric utility rates.

(Pub. L. 95–617, title I, §131, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3131.)
**Officer      Compensation Table**

|  **Name                and Principal Position**                                                                                                              | **2007****Salary** | **2006                Short-Term****Incentive                Bonuses** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Christopher                L. DuttonPresident                and Chief ExecutiveOfficer                                                                     |  $381,100     |  $0                                                               |
| Mary                G. PowellSenior                Vice President andChief                Operating Officer                                                       | $278,100           | $0                                                                     |
| Robert                J. GriffinVice                President, Power Supply and Risk Management                                                                   | $199,820           | $0                                                                     |
| Donald                J. Rendall, Jr.Vice                President, General Counseland                Corporate Secretary                                         | $197,760           | $0                                                                     |
| Walter                S. OakesVice                President - Field Operations                                                                                    | $161,710           | $0                                                                     |
| Dawn                D. Bugbee    Vice                President, Chief Financial    Officer                & Treasurer | $183,750           | $0                                                                     |
STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
S.Y. Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
                   
                 
                               For the Three Months         For the Nine Months
                               --------------------         -------------------
                                Ended September 30           Ended September 30
                                ------------------           ------------------
                                 1996       1995                1996       1995
                                 ----       ----                ----       ----
PRIMARY

Average shares
  outstanding                3,270,452   3,249,050         3,266,334  3,244,486
Effect of assumed conversion
  of stock options under
  treasury stock method         99,746      57,026            96,128     56,308
                             ---------   ---------         ---------  ---------
                             3,370,198   3,306,076         3,362,462  3,300,794
                             =========   =========         =========  =========
     Net income             $1,460,000  $1,088,000        $3,868,000 $3,092,000
                             =========   =========         =========  =========
     Per share              $      .44  $      .33        $     1.15 $      .94
                             =========   =========         =========  =========
FULLY DILUTED

Average shares
  outstanding                3,270,452   3,249,050         3,266,334  3,244,486
Effect of assumed conversion
  of stock options under
  treasury stock method        114,058      57,924           116,674     59,460
                             ---------   ---------         ---------  ---------
                             3,384,510   3,306,974         3,383,008  3,303,946
                             =========   =========         =========  =========
     Net income             $1,460,000  $1,088,000        $3,868,000 $3,092,000
                             =========   =========         =========  =========
     Per share              $      .43  $      .33        $     1.15 $      .94
                             =========   =========         =========  =========

All share and per share information has been restated to reflect the 2-for-1
stock split which occurred in the third quarter of 1996.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT


TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION  906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President, Finance and Operations and Treasurer of Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) does hereby certify as follows:





This annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2010 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Robert A. McKinneyDate: March 15, 2011
Robert A. McKinney

Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President, Finance & Operations and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS
N O . A P - 76, 074

EX PA R TE C LIFTO N LE V O N PO R C H ER , A ppl i c ant

ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A W RI T OF HABE AS CORP US CAUS E N O. 9 9 1 3 8 6 I N T HE 2 3 2 n d DI S TR I CT COURT

FROM HA RRI S CO UNTY

P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Crim i n al P ro ce dure, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habe as cor

pus. Ex pa rte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of capital murde r and sente nced to li f

e ye a r s ’ impr isonment. The Four teenthCourt of Appea ls affirme d his conviction. Po rc he r v . S

tate , No. 14-05-00867- CR (Te x . App.–Houston [14 Dist.] , delivere d Marc h 6, 2007, th no pet.)
. Applicant conte nds that his appellate counsel re ndere d ineff e c ti v e a s s is ta

n c e b e c a u s e counsel failed to timely

notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed to advise himof2

his rig ht to petition f

or discre tionary

revie w pro se. We remande d this application to the trial court for f indings of f

act a nd conclusions of law
. Appellate counsel filed an aff idavit w ith the trial court. Ba sed on that aff idavit, the trial court has ente red f

indings of f

act a nd conclusions of lawthat appellate co u n s el fa iled to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had be en affirmed and failed to a dvise himof his rig ht to petition for dis c re tio na

ry a pp e a l pro se. The trial court rec ommends that relief be g rante d

. Ex parte W

ilson , 956 S.W. 2d 25 (T e x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 97 ). We f ind , th e re fo re , th at App lic ant i s e nti tle d to the op po rt un ity to file an out-of

-time petition fo r d i s cr eti onary revie w of the judg ment of the Four teenthCourt of Appea ls in Cause No. 14-05-00867- CR that aff irmed his conviction in Ca se No. 991386 from the 232nd J udicial District Court o f Ha rr i s County . Applicant shall file his petition for discre tionary revie w with the Fou rt eenthCourt of Appea ls within 30 day s of the date on which this Court’s
mand ate iss ue s.

Deliver ed: J anuar

y 28, 2009 Do no t pu bli sh
#### In the Matter of Christian Waugh, Appellant, v New York City Fire Department, Respondent.

[826 NYS2d 13]

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Karen S. Smith, J.), entered December 20, 2005, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding, brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, to annul a determination of respondent New York City Fire Department, dated December 2, 2004, finding petitioner guilty of various disciplinary infractions and terminating his employment as a firefighter, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The use immunity afforded petitioner at a departmental interview investigating possible criminal activity was sufficient to protect his state and federal constitutional rights against self-incrimination *(see People v Corrigan,*80 NY2d 326, 329 [1992]; *Matter of Matt v Larocca,*71 NY2d 154, 159-160 [1987], *cert denied*486 US 1007 [1988]); transactional immunity was not required *(Matter of Cortes v County of Nassau,*248 AD2d 616, 617 [1998]). Eetitioner’s refusal to answer any questions even when afforded use immunity subjected him to the penalty of dismissal *(Matter of Matt v Larocca, supra).*

Notwithstanding petitioner’s prior unblemished 10-year record, the penalty imposed does not shock our sense of fairness *(see Matter of Kelly v Safir,*96 NY2d 32 [2001]; *Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County,*34 NY2d 222, 237 [1974]). Eetitioner’s refusal to cooperate, even when afforded use immunity and informed that he was subject to dismissal for failing to cooperate, frustrated an investigation of serious charges of criminal activity implicating the integrity of respondent Fire Department. Concur—Andrias, J.E, Friedman, Sullivan, Nardelli and Malone, JJ.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls
o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :
A1 9 I 0 0 40
. THE BANK OF N EW YORK MELLON F KA THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTI FI CATE HOLDERS OF CW ALT v . MARK C. MAJ OR et a l
. Up o n co n s i d erat i o n of t h e Ap p l i cat io n fo r In t erl o cu t o ry Ap p eal , i t i s o rd ered t h at i t b e h ereb y

DENIED.

LC NUM BERS: 1 8 CV1 29 8

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 

## October 04, 2018

10/04/2018
<PAGE>


Exhibit 31.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Sterling E. Phillips, Jr., certify that:

         (1) I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to annual report on Form 10-K
of Analex Corporation (the "Company") for the year ending December 31, 2002;

         (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

         (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         (4) The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

                  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

                  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and; and

                  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Company's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's
most recent fiscal quarter (the Company's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially effect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting; and

         (5) The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of
directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):

                  (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the Company's internal controls.

Date: September 5, 2003






/s/ Sterling E. Phillips, Jr.
-------------------------------------
Sterling E. Phillips, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 15 

Expressing support for the designation of October 28, 2019, as ‘‘Honoring 

the Nation’s First Responders Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 1, 2019 

Ms. WARREN (for herself, Mr. COTTON, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. PETERS, Ms. 

ROSEN, and Mr. LANKFORD) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

JUNE 4, 2019 

Reported by Mr. JOHNSON, without amendment 

JUNE 5, 2019 

Considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of October 28, 2019, 

as ‘‘Honoring the Nation’s First Responders Day’’. 

Whereas first responders include professional and volunteer 

fire, police, emergency medical technician, and paramedic 

workers in the United States; 

Whereas, according to a 2017 compilation of data on the 

Emergency Services Sector in the United States by the 

Department of Homeland Security, ‘‘The first responder 

community comprises an estimated 4.6 million career and 

volunteer professionals within five primary disciplines: 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 15 ATS 

Law Enforcement, Fire and Rescue Services, Emergency 

Medical Services, Emergency Management, and Public 

Works.’’; 

Whereas first responders deserve to be recognized for their 

commitment to safety, defense, and honor; and 

Whereas October 28, 2019, would be an appropriate day to 

establish as ‘‘Honoring the Nation’s First Responders 

Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) supports the designation of October 28, 

4 2019, as ‘‘Honoring the Nation’s First Responders 

5 Day’’; 

6 (2) honors and recognizes the contributions of 

7 first responders; and 

8 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

9 to observe Honoring the Nation’s First Responders 

10 Day with appropriate ceremonies and activities that 

11 promote awareness of the contributions of first re12 sponders in the United States. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS