alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Document Search 
-  Hurricanes Fiona and Ian – Initial Disaster Assistance and Recovery Response 

# Hurricanes Fiona and Ian – Initial Disaster Assistance and Recovery Response

## About this document and download

The Office of Inspector General (OIG) is issuing this inspection report to present the results of our assessment of the U.S. Small Business Administration’s (SBA) initial response to Hurricanes Fiona and Ian, including staffing adequacy, loan application volume, and timeliness of disaster loan approvals.

We found SBA’s initial response to Hurricanes Fiona and Ian was timely and effective. The agency established a field presence within 3 business days and opened a Business Recovery Center within 10 business days for both hurricanes, meeting its strategic goal. Additionally, SBA successfully addressed initial staffing concerns and maintained adequate staffing levels throughout its response to both hurricanes.

The agency reacted to anticipated resource needs by implementing a hiring initiative and providing advanced specialty training. These actions addressed a projected staffing shortfall, including the need for bilingual staff who were brought in to assist from other SBA offices.

  Download  .pdf

**Effective**

**Owned by**

**Related Programs**    Related programs:
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 31, 2020. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 31, 2020 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20D0433. E HOWARD CARSON, JR. et al. v. TOM BROWN et al.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 17CV0806
**Exhibit 23.01**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S 8 (No. 333-151883, No. 333-143673, No. 333-116436, No. 333-56741, No. 333-39946, No. 333-91408 and No. 333-106390) of UFP Technologies, Inc., our report, dated March 16, 2011, relating to the 2010 consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10 K.

 
| */s/   CCR LLP*              |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| Westborough,   Massachusetts |   |
| March 16,   2011        |   |

 

1

----
#### § 16.11 Other rights and services.

Nothing in this subpart shall be construed to entitle any person, as of right, to any service or to the disclosure of any record to which such person is not entitled under the FOIA.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-10-00806- CV

John L . Wiley and Ran di Wil ey, Appellants

v. William H. Car m ean and L ind a D. Carm ean; Thom as R. P age; Edward J. Mitschke, Jr.; Texas Country Title Co.; and Chicago Title Insu rance C om pany, Ap pellees

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F LEE CO UNTY, 335 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 13,7 61, H ONO RAB LE REVA TOW SLEE CO RB ETT, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellants J ohn L
. Wil ey and Randi Wil ey appea l the trial court’s o rd er g ranting partial summary judgme nt for appellee Chicag o Title I nsuranc e Company
. Chicag o Title I nsuranc e Company has filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction with this Court, c ontending that the orde r d i d not dispose of appellants’ claims ag ainst other defe ndants and, there fore , that it is a non-appe alable, interlocutory order
. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §§ 51.012, .014 (West 2008 & Supp. 2010); Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp ., 39 S.W .3d 191, 200 (Tex. 2001) (judg ment final for pu rp o s es o f an appea l if it disposes of all pending parties and claims befor e the trial court).

Appellants have filed a re sponse and unopposed motion to stay proce eding s. Appellants agr ee that the orde r being appea led is not final and appe alable a nd reque st a stay of all proce eding s u n til such time as a sever ance order is obtained from the trial court. See Teerv. Duddlesten , 664 S.W .2d 702, 703-04 (Tex. 1984) (without sever ance , summary judgme nt which

does not dispose of all par ties and issues is interlocutory and not appe alable)
. Texas Rule of Appellant Procedur e 27.2 provides that an appellate court may permit
a party to cure a p re m at u re l y fi l ed appea l by allowing “an appea led order that is not final to be modified so as to be made final and may allow the modified order and all proce eding s rela ting to it to be included in a supplemental rec ord.” Tex. R. App. P. 27.2. We, there fore , abate this appea l to g ive appellants 60 day s afte r the date of this order to take action to cure the jurisdictional defe ct and t o p ay for and reque st a supplemental cler k’s rec ord containing a signe d order of sever ance o r an order otherwise disposing of the rema ining claims ag ainst the other defe ndants. Fa ilure to c omply with this order will result i n dismiss al of this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P
. 42.3(a) ; Iacono v . Lyons , 6 S.W .3d 715, 717 (Tex. App.—Houston [1s t Dist.] 1999, order ).

__________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Jus tice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Rose and Goodwin Abated Filed: Jul y

12, 2011

2
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 45 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 45

 Providing for the use of the catafalque situated in the crypt beneath 
 the Rotunda of the Capitol in connection with memorial services to be 
 conducted in the Supreme Court Building and the Capitol for the late 
 honorable Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Associate Justice of the United States 
                             Supreme Court.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 21, 2020

   Mr. Blunt (for himself and Ms. Klobuchar) submitted the following 
       concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for the use of the catafalque situated in the crypt beneath 
 the Rotunda of the Capitol in connection with memorial services to be 
 conducted in the Supreme Court Building and the Capitol for the late 
 honorable Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Associate Justice of the United States 
                             Supreme Court.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That the Architect of the Capitol is authorized and directed to 
transfer to the custody of the Supreme Court of the United States the 
catafalque which is situated in the crypt beneath the Rotunda of the 
Capitol so that such catafalque may be used in the Supreme Court 
Building in connection with services to be conducted there for the late 
honorable Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Associate Justice of the United States 
Supreme Court. The custody of the catafalque shall then be returned to 
the Architect of the Capitol to be used in connection with such 
services to be conducted in National Statuary Hall.
                                 <all>
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About SBA 
-  SBA Office Locations 
-  Headquarters Offices 
-  Office of Business Development 

## Section navigation

-  SBA locations    -  Headquarters Offices      -  Office of Business Development 
    -  Office of Capital Access 
    -  Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer 
    -  Office of the Chief Information Officer 
    -  Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience 
    -  Office of Diversity, Inclusion and Civil Rights 
    -  Office of Entrepreneurial Development 
    -  Office of Entrepreneurship Education 
    -  Office of Field Operations 
    -  Office of General Counsel 
    -  Office of Government Contracting & Business Development 
    -  Office of Government Contracting 
    -  Office of the HUBZone Program 
    -  Office of International Trade 
    -  Office of Investment and Innovation 
    -  Office of Native American Affairs 
    -  Office of Performance, Planning, and the Chief Financial Officer 
    -  Office of Policy, Planning and Liaison 
    -  Office of Small Business Development Centers 
    -  Office of Veterans Business Development 
    -  Office of Women's Business Ownership 
  -  Disaster Offices 
  -  District Offices 
  -  Loan and Guaranty Centers 
-  Open government 
-  SBA Newsroom 
-  Work for SBA 
-  Organization 
-  Oversight and advocacy 
-  Information in other languages 

# Office of Business Development

----

## Content

----

## About our office

The Office of Business Development was created to help small disadvantaged businesses compete in the market place. It is also designed to assist such companies in gaining access to federal and private procurement markets. The focus of this office is to provide business development support, such as mentoring, procurement assistance, business counseling, training, financial assistance, surety bonding and other management and technical assistance. The goal, however, is to prepare small disadvantaged firms for procurement and other business opportunities.

## Resources

                  - 8(a) Business Development Forms
                  - Learn About and Apply for the 8(a) Business Development Program
                  - Office of Government Contracting and Business Development
                  - Mentor-Protégé Program
                  - Federal Communications Commission
                  - Department of Commerce
                  - Minority Business Roundtable
                  - Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) About Surplus Property
                  - Business Development Regulations 13 CFR Parts 121 and 124

## Contact us

Office of Business Development409 3rd St. SW, Suite 8800Washington, DC 20416

Phone: 202-205-5852
Transformer Products

1900 East North Street

Waukesha, WI 53188

Phone: (262) 547-1251

Fax: (262) 524-4513

jerry.corkran@cooperindustries.com 

Cell 262-442-9148

Ms. Brenda Edwards-Jones February 21, 2012

U.S. Department of Energy 

Building Technologies Program 

Mailstop EE-2J 

ANOPR for Distribution Transformers 

EE-RM/STD-00-550 

1000 Independence Ave. SW 

Washington, DC 20585-0121

Re: Cooper Industries supports DOE Transformer NOPR [RIN 1904–AC04, Docket No. EERE–

2010–BT–STD–0048] and Federal support document 77 FR 7282 (10 February 2012) along with 

Technical Correction

Dear Ms. Edwards-Jones;

Cooper Power Systems, a division of Cooper Industries, is a Distribution Transformer Manufacturer 

with four manufacturing facilities in the United States. Cooper is a major supplier to many of the 

electrical utilities impacted by the improved efficiency standards proposed by the DOE.

Cooper Power Systems would like to commend the Department of Energy on its proposed ruling on 

transformer efficiency, and offer our gratitude for having had the opportunity to participate in the 

rulemaking working group. Based on our analysis and the information presented by all parties 

during working group sessions, Cooper considers the proposed ruling the best choice for the 

distribution transformer industry and for the American people who will receive more efficient 

transformers in a cost justifiable manner. Furthermore, the proposed ruling will allow both silicon 

core steel and amorphous core steel to participate in the distribution transformer market. The result 

of the ruling will ensure continuity of supply, future competitiveness of domestic core steel 

manufacturing, and considers the impact of pole transformer weight and transformer affordability.

I will participate in the public Meeting this Thursday to strongly express Cooper Power Systems’ 

support of the DOE’s proposed ruling.

Regards,

 Jerry Corkran
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Find Upcoming Events 
-  Breaking Down Barriers To Government Contracting 

# Breaking Down Barriers to Government Contracting 

###  Date and time 

Monday, April 15, 20249:00 a.m.- 3:00 p.m. EDT

###           Location        

Millyard Museum200 Bedford Street, Suite 103Manchester, NH03101
View Map

### Organizer

                    Theresa Pinto

###  Host organization 

SBA NH, Veterans Business Outreach Center of New England, NH Apex Accelerator, and GSA 

###  Type of event 

SBA event

## Event description

Join the New Hampshire SBA District Office, Veterans Business Outreach Center of NewEngland, and NH Apex Accelerators for this can’t miss opportunity to highlight yourVOSB/SDVOSB through networking, a veteran-exclusive mini matchmaker, and tworoundtable discussions on BREAK DOWNING BARRIERS to Government Contracting. 

Monday, April 15, 20249:00 am - 3:00 pmMillyard Museum200 Bedford St Suite 103, Manchester, NH 03101

Agenda

9:00 am Coffee & Networking9:30 am Roundtable I: Breaking Down Barriers10:30 am Networking11:00 am Roundtable II: Building Your Business12:00 pm Networking1:00 - 3:00 pm Mini Matchmaker 
Register
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Golden Enterprises, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark W.
McCutcheon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 25, 2003
/s/_Mark_W._McCutcheon_______________
Mark W. McCutcheon
President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Golden Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Golden Enterprises,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

                                       46
# USEPA REGION IX TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT

for SJVUAPCD Rule 9510 ATTACHMENT 4

### 10 

### days Application I

Yes 

### t Project deemed ccmplek 

# Application Review Process 

# P San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution CoddIlsW March 01,2035

Completeness Letker to Applicant Letter to Land UsePgency



## - Emissions Cdculah 

## - Project R 

### evie#

30 

### days Proposed ON-SITE Emlsslon Redudons? 00% Requ~ Reductions met 

# ++-

hb Yes hb T 

### Calculation of OFF-SE Emlsslon RedudmnFee onltorlng an Reporbng
Has applcant submltteda Fee
T

Evaluation Fee In- (Note ') Letter to Land Use Agency

hb X X X T T 

# I T 

### Calculation of OFF-SE Emlsslon RedudmnFee

Payment by Applicant Note. An In\!nlra 5~111 hn 1ccl8nd of nnstrirl nrnrnss~nn rnst nrrnndc harpadrahmb Payment by Applicant Payment by Appl~cant
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Homeland Security U.S. Customs and Border Protection
 AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
 ACTION: General Notice.
 SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 641 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, (19 U.S.C. 1641) and the U.S. Customs and Border Protection regulations (19 CFR 111.45), the following Customs broker licenses and all associated permits are revoked with prejudice. Name
License #
Issuing portGregory Manuelian
09305
New YorkMarquis Clearance Services, Ltd.
06207
New York
 Dated: February 28, 2011. Daniel Baldwin, Assistant Commissioner, Office of International Trade.


[FR Doc. 2011-5451 Filed 3-9-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
### §18f–1. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 101–512, title I, §116, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1937, which related to disposal of unnecessary or duplicate museum objects and use of proceeds, was transferred and is set out as a note under section 102501 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

AIRPORT SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE COMPUTATION
 (in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     YEAR ENDED
                                                                      APRIL 30,
                                                                 -------    -------
                                                                   1997       1996
                                                                 -------    -------
<S>                                                              <C>        <C>
          PRIMARY
---------------------------------------------

Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders              $   599    $  (212)
                                                                 =======    =======

Weighted average number of common
  shares outstanding during the periods                            2,230      2,192

Add - dilutive common equivalent shares
  (determined using the "treasury stock method")
  representing shares issuable upon the exercise
  of stock options                                                   170         --
                                                                 -------    -------

Weighted average number of shares used
   in calculation of primary net income (loss) per share           2,400      2,192
                                                                 =======    =======

Net income (loss) per common share - primary                     $  0.25    $ (0.10)
                                                                 =======    =======

          FULLY DILUTED
---------------------------------------------

Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders              $   599    $  (212)
                                                                 =======    =======


Weighted average number of shares used in calculating
  primary net income per common share computation                  2,400      2,192

Add (deduct) incremental shares representing:
  Shares issuable upon exercise of stock options
    included in primary calculation above                           (170)        --

  Shares issuable upon exercise of stock options
    based on period-end market price                                 170         --
                                                                 -------    -------

    Weighted average number of shares used in
      calculation of fully diluted net income (loss) per share     2,400      2,192
                                                                 =======    =======

Net income (loss) per common share - fully diluted               $  0.25    $ (0.10)
                                                                 =======    =======
</TABLE>


                                     page 21
#### § 17.3 Definitions.

The terms defined or used in Executive Order 12958 and Executive Order 12968, and the implementing directives in 32 CFR 2001, are applicable to this part.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
 
                          NATIONAL DENTEX CORPORATION
 
                      COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                     ---------------------------------------------
                                                        1994             1995             1996
                                                     -----------      -----------      -----------
<S>                                                  <C>              <C>              <C>
Computation of Primary Net Income per Share:
Net Income applicable to common stock..............  $ 2,402,702      $ 3,243,808      $ 3,704,926
                                                     -----------      -----------      -----------
Shares:
     Weighted average common shares outstanding....    3,025,130        3,175,150        3,414,411
     Add: Shares issuable from assumed exercise of
       options and warrants (as determined by the
       application of the treasury stock method)...      296,412          252,059           94,820
                                                     -----------      -----------      -----------
     Weighted average common shares outstanding as
       adjusted....................................    3,321,542        3,427,209        3,509,231
                                                     -----------      -----------      -----------
     Primary net income per share..................  $      0.72      $      0.95      $      1.06
                                                     ===========      ===========      ===========
Computation of Fully Diluted Net Income per Share:
Net income per primary computation above...........  $ 2,402,702      $ 3,243,808      $ 3,704,926
                                                     -----------      -----------      -----------
Shares:
     Weighted average common shares outstanding....    3,025,130        3,175,150        3,414,411
     Add: Shares issuable from assumed exercise of
       options and warrants (as determined by the
       application of the treasury stock method)...      302,218          318,405           94,820
                                                     -----------      -----------      -----------
     Weighted average common shares outstanding as
       adjusted....................................    3,327,348        3,493,555        3,509,231
                                                     -----------      -----------      -----------
     Fully diluted net income per share............  $      0.72      $      0.93      $      1.06
                                                     ===========      ===========      ===========
</TABLE>