alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Luigi Criscuoli, Respondent, v. Flora Criscuoli, Appellant.

Motion for reargument granted, and hearing set down for Monday, June 2, 1913. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Rich and Stapleton, JJ.
#### Wadley & Smythe, Respondent, v. William Henry Hall, Appellant, Impleaded with Another, Defendant.

Judgment in so far as appealed from affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Jeriks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cedar Grove Marketing, Inc.,
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2001 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  B.
Stephen Bailey,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge  and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### -/^' ZJ-, JLd, JU0/J ^^^-=^^^^^--^

ARTO3-20F Abel Acosta, Clerk

## /^r-// La^tdZL
jUfr,i GsrarZi JffU? l£f Dtfte.y 

### •?•• 4^^k^^ ^ 42L-J5L& 

### x/^-i^//.2 

### A^Uldt^U—^Ji^h^L ZIMLi^.J/tM^M^^l/leM^ 

### thy s^zda* /./?. A A i^i^}hjJ&£Soa^- AMs/tifa TJT'ffoktf^ 

### ///tfAiUsry&M** sA>z/mtf>^« D wrffiJ/tlfam, j^^6M—^ ad£2^£^amd~- 

### $ JL0/J 

### £m^^_t2^^^'RCQ-G^AMD^E--DISTRICT 

### zfr^f//(.m^w*
i|i||li/ii|i.h«pi|iil>ii'|li|iii.i,||ii|.iHM».l|.ii|N,|i 3
### **CHAPTER 84—HEALTHY FOREST RESTORATION**

Sec.
6501.
Purposes.
6502.
Definitions.

#### SUBCHAPTER I—HAZARDOUS FUEL REDUCTION ON FEDERAL LAND

6511.
Definitions.
6512.
Authorized hazardous fuel reduction projects.
6513.
Prioritization.
6514.
Environmental analysis.
6515.
Special administrative review process.
6516.
Judicial review in United States district courts.
6517.
Effect of subchapter.
6518.
Authorization of appropriations.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—BIOMASS

6531.
Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—WATERSHED FORESTRY ASSISTANCE

6541.
Omitted.
6542.
Water Source Protection Program.
6543.
Watershed Condition Framework.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—INSECT INFESTATIONS AND RELATED DISEASES

6551.
Findings and purpose.
6552.
Definitions.
6553.
Accelerated information gathering regarding forest-damaging insects.
6554.
Applied silvicultural assessments.
6555.
Relation to other laws.
6556.
Termination of effectiveness.

#### SUBCHAPTER V—HEALTHY FORESTS RESERVE PROGRAM

6571.
Establishment of healthy forests reserve program.
6572.
Eligibility and enrollment of lands in program.
6573.
Restoration plans.
6574.
Financial assistance.
6575.
Technical assistance.
6576.
Protections and measures.
6577.
Involvement by other agencies and organizations.
6578.
Funding.

#### SUBCHAPTER VI—MISCELLANEOUS

6591.
Forest stands inventory and monitoring program to improve detection of and response to environmental threats.
6591a.
Designation of treatment areas.
6591b.
Administrative review.
6591c.
Stewardship end result contracting projects.
6591d.
Wildfire resilience projects.
6591e.
Categorical exclusion for greater sage-grouse and mule deer habitat.
6592.
Wildfire risk reduction.
6592a.
Ecosystem restoration.
6592b.
Establishment of fuel breaks in forests and other wildland vegetation.
6592c.
Emergency actions.
6592d.
Joint Chiefs Landscape Restoration Partnership program.
### §410aaa–59. No adverse effect on land until acquired

Unless and until acquired by the United States, no lands within the boundaries of wilderness areas or National Park System units designated or enlarged by this Act that are owned by any person or entity other than the United States shall be subject to any of the rules or regulations applicable solely to the Federal lands within such boundaries and may be used to the extent allowed by applicable law. Neither the location of such lands within such boundaries nor the possible acquisition of such lands by the United States shall constitute a bar to the otherwise lawful issuance of any Federal license or permit other than a license or permit related to activities governed by section 100903 of title 54. Nothing in this section shall be construed as affecting the applicability of any provision of section 1865(b) of title 18, subchapter III of chapter 1007 of title 54, the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.), or regulations applicable to oil and gas development as set forth in 36 CFR 9B.

(Pub. L. 103–433, title V, §519, Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4495.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is defined in section 3 of Pub. L. 103–433, which is set out as a Definitions note under section 410aaa of this title.

The Clean Air Act, referred to in text, is act July 14, 1955, ch. 360, 69 Stat. 322, which is classified generally to chapter 85 (§7401 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 7401 of Title 42 and Tables.

#### Codification

In text, "section 100903 of title 54" substituted for "16 U.S.C. 460l–22(c)" and "section 1865(b) of title 18, subchapter III of chapter 1007 of title 54" substituted for "the Mining in the Parks Act (16 U.S.C. 1901 et seq.)" on authority of Pub. L. 113–287, §6(e), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272, which Act enacted Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
*Personal privacy information*	

	

	


		
	
	
			###
Editorial Note on Part 0
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

§ 0.157 Federal Bureau of Investigation—Drug Enforcement Administration Senior Executive Service. ( a ) Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 3151, there is established a personnel system for senior personnel within the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be known as the FBI-DEA Senior Executive Service (FBI-DEA SES).
( b ) Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 3151(b)(2)(B), a career employee in the civil service is one who occupies, or who within the last 5 years occupied, a permanent position in the competitive service, a career-type permanent position in the excepted service, or a permanent position in the SES while serving under a career appointment. A career-type permanent position in the excepted service does not include: ( 1 ) A Schedule C position authorized under 5 CFR 213.3301;
( 2 ) A position that meets the same criteria as a Schedule C position; and
( 3 ) A position where the incumbent is traditionally removed upon a change in Presidential Administration.
( c ) Except as to the position of Deputy Director of the FBI (which remains subject to the exclusive authority of the Attorney General), the FBI-DEA SES is subject to the overall supervision and direction of the Deputy Attorney General, who shall ensure that the FBI-DEA SES is designed and administered in compliance with all statutory and regulatory requirements.
( d ) The Attorney General retains the authority to recommend members of the FBI-DEA SES for Presidential Rank Awards.
[Order No. 1600-92, 57 FR 31314, July 15, 1992, as amended by Order No. 1975-95, 60 FR 35335, July 7, 1995; Order No. 2250-99, 64 FR 46846, Aug. 27, 1999]
(61 South. 870.)

No. 19,161.

#### KELLY, WEBER & CO., Limited, v. VORDENBAUMEN LUMBER CO., Limited.

(April 14, 1913.

Rehearing Denied May 12, 1913.)

*(Syllabus by the Court.)*

Appeal and Error (§ 46*) — Jurisdiction— Amount in Controversy.

This court is without jurisdiction of an appeal taken by a clerk of a district court from a judgment rejecting his claim for $194.50 demanded of the appellant in a cause for preparing, for the purposes of the transcript of appeal, a copy of the transcript of the parol testimony taken in such cause.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Appeal and Error, Cent. Dig. §§ 198-201; Dec. Dig. § 46.*1

Provosty, J., dissenting.

Appeal from Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Lafayette; Wm. Campbell, Judge.

*918Action by Kelly, Weber & Co., Limited, against the Vordenbaumen Lumber Company, Limited. Appeal on rule of clerk.

Appeal dismissed.

John L. Kennedy and Crow Girard, both ■of La Fayette, and Story & Pugh, of Crowley, for appellant. Pujo, Moss & Miller, of Lake Charles, O. C. Mouton, of La Fayette, and W. B. Williamson, of Lake Charles, for ■appellee.

MONROE, J.

The clerk of the district •court has appealed from a judgment rejecting his demand for the payment of $194.50, which he alleges is due him by the plaintiff in the above-entitled suit “for preparing a ■copy of the transcript of the parol testimony taken on the trial of this cause,” for the appeal whereby the case was brought to this court, the cause thus referred to being the •cause bearing the above title, with the number 19,065 of the docket of this court (62 South. 910, 133 La. —), and which has been this day decided.

The ground upon which the appellate jurisdiction of this court is invoked has not been indicated by tbe learned counsel, and we know of none upon which it might be supposed to rest.

The appeal is therefore dismissed, at the •cost of the appellant.

PROVOSTY, J., dissents.
### §284b. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary, but not in excess of $5,473,000, to carry out the purposes of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 89–671, §3, Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 951; Pub. L. 92–272, title II, §201(4), Apr. 11, 1972, 86 Stat. 120.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1972—Pub. L. 92–272 increased maximum sums authorized to be appropriated from not in excess of $600,000 to not in excess of $5,473,000.
SERVED JULY 6, 2012 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

EXECUTIVE HELICOPTERS, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0476 

NOTICE .OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2009S0950054) has been assigned to 

the undersigned. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall 

be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service 

List. 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Jeremy Bass, President 

Executive Helicopters, Inc., Respondent 

3231 Victory Street 

Hanger 328 West 

Myrtle Beach, SC 29577 

TEL: 843-333-1626 

FAX: 843-828'-0307 

ONE COPY 

Autumn Killingham, Complainant's Counsel 

Enforcement Division 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Ave. S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

TEL: 202~267-7728 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

· Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-0476 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
EXHIBIT 10.16

                              PROMISSORY NOTE

$29,224.13                                                September 19,2003

     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, we the undersigned, promise to pay to the order of
                   TC Albuquerque Rose Interests LLC and
                    TC Albuquerque Rabina Interests LLC

The Principal sum of Twenty Eight Thousand Two Hundred Twenty Four Dollars
and thirteen cents ($28,224.13) plus eight percent interest (8%) of One
Thousand One Hundred Twenty Seven Dollars and Eighty Six cents, a total
amount due of Twenty Nine Thousand Three Hundred Fifty Two Dollars
($29,352).  Interest is calculated from August 1,2003 to January 30,2004.

A payment in the amount of Five Hundred Dollars and no Cents ($500) is due
October 1, 2003.  Thereafter, a payment of principal & interest in the
amount of Five Hundred Dollars and no Cents ($500) is due October 1, 2003
through January 1, 2004 for a period of four (4) months.  A final payment
of principal in the amount of twenty seven thousand three hundred fifty two
dollars ($27,352) is due on February 1, 2004.  Additional payments may be
made in advance and will be applied to the principal balance.

The said Principal shall be payable at 1807 Second Street #11, Santa Fe,
New Mexico, 87505, or at such other place as the Holders hereof may
designate in writing.

In event of default in the payment of any installment under this Note, and
if the default is not made good prior to a date specified by a Notice to
Maker, the entire Principal sum shall at once become due and payable at the
option of the Note Holder.  The date specified shall not be less than
thirty days from the date written notice is mailed.  Failure to exercise
this Option shall not constitute a waiver of the right to exercise it at
any other time. If suit is brought on this Note, or if any attorney is
employed to collect it, the undersigned promise to pay all reasonable costs
of collection, including reasonable attorney's fees.

Presentment, Protest, and Notice of dishonor are hereby waived by all
Makers.  This Note shall be the joint and several obligations of all
Makers, sureties, guarantors and endorsers, and shall be binding upon them
and their successors and assigns.

/s/ Richard Govatski
Richard Govatski
**EXHIBIT 31.02**

 

**IGN ENTERTAINMENT, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, **SEAN C. DEORSEY**, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IGN Entertainment, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, is made known to me by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of the directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 33 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 33

    Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign 
 military sale to the United Arab Emirates of certain defense articles 
                             and services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2019

Mr. Menendez (for himself, Mr. Graham, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Paul, Mr. Leahy, 
  Mr. Young, and Mr. Reed) introduced the following joint resolution; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign 
 military sale to the United Arab Emirates of certain defense articles 
                             and services.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the following proposed 
foreign military sale to the United Arab Emirates is prohibited:
            (1) The sale of the following defense articles, including 
        defense services and technical data, described in Transmittal 
        No. 17-73, submitted to Congress pursuant to section 36(b) of 
        the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(b)) and published 
        in the Congressional Record on June 4, 2019: The proposed sale 
        of 20,004 Advanced Precision Kill Weapon Systems (APKWS) II 
        All-Up-Rounds; weapons support and test equipment; spares; 
        technical publications; personnel training; other training 
        equipment; transportation; United States Government and 
        contractor engineering; technical and logistics support 
        services; and other related elements of logistical and program 
        support.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 541.1 Purpose.

This subpart describes the Federal Bureau of Prisons' (Bureau) inmate discipline program. This program helps ensure the safety, security, and orderly operation of correctional facilities, and the protection of the public, by allowing Bureau staff to impose sanctions on inmates who commit prohibited acts. Sanctions will not be imposed in a capricious or retaliatory manner. The Bureau's inmate discipline program is authorized by 18 U.S.C. 4042(a)(3).
### Part C—Wild and Scenic Rivers and Trout Reserve
Exhibit 10.32








HADRON, INC.





REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITY NOTE





|$4,000,000.00 | McLean, Virginia
|------------- | ----------------

November 2, 2001





FOR VALUE RECEIVED,the undersigned, HADRON, INC.,a New York corporation (the Borrower),promises to pay
to the order of BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. (the Lender) on or before the Revolving Credit Facility Maturity Date, and at such earlier dates as may be required by the Agreement (as defined below), the aggregate unpaid
principal amount of all Revolving Credit Facility Loans made by the Lender to the Borrower from time to time pursuant to the Agreement. The Borrower further promises to pay to the order of the Lender interest on the unpaid principal amount hereof
from time to time outstanding at the rate or rates per annum determined pursuant to the Agreement, payable on the dates set forth in the Agreement.





This Note is the Revolving Credit Facility Note referred to in, and is entitled to the benefits of, the Credit Agreement, dated as of November 2, 2001 by and among the Borrower, the
Subsidiary Guarantors and the Lender (as the same may be amended, modified or supplemented from time to time, the Agreement), which among other things provides for the acceleration of the maturity hereof upon the occurrence of
certain events and for prepayments in certain circumstances and upon certain terms and conditions. Terms defined in the Agreement have the same meanings herein.





If the Borrower fails to make any payment under this Note within seven days after the due date, the Borrower shall pay the Lender a late charge of five percent of the amount of the
payment.





This Note is secured by and is entitled to the benefits of the Liens granted by the Security Agreement referred to in
the Agreement.





The Borrower hereby expressly waives presentment, demand, protest and all other demands and notices (except as
otherwise provided in the Agreement) in connection with the delivery, acceptance, performance, default or enforcement of this Note and the Agreement, and an action for amounts due hereunder or thereunder shall immediately accrue, in each case except
as otherwise expressly provided in the Agreement.





This Note shall be governed by, and construed and enforced in accordance
with, the laws of Virginia, without regard to principles of choice of law.








HADRON, INC.By:

/s/    STERLING E. PHILLIPS,
JR.Sterling E. Phillips, Jr. Chief Executive
Officer
#### Dickinson v. Holden *et al.*

July 14, 1910.

Complaint for land. Before Judge Meadow. Taliaferro superior court.

April 21, 1909.

W. *O. Mitchell*and *Anderson, Felder, Rountree & Wilson, for*plaintiff. *John C. Hart, Samuel H. Sibley,*and *Halves Cloud,*for defendants.

Beck, J.

A will contained, the following- items which were before the court for construction: “Item 3rd. I give to my daughter, Catherine T. Thornton, five hundred acres of land, with all the improvements, including the house and lot on which I now live, . . to have and to hold the same for the maintenance, use, and benefit of said Catherine T. Thornton, during- her life, and then to revert back to *my*grandchildren, John T. Dickinson, W. Q. Dickinson, and the heirs of Richard A. Dickinson, deceased. Said property not to be subject to the debts or liabilities of said Catherine T. Thornton in any manner whatsoever. Item 7th. Should either of my grandchildren, John T. Dickinson or W. Q., or my great grandchildren, A. Q. find B. B. Dickinson, die without heirs, then the property above given, thus left, shall be given to the estate of the survivors.” The devise contained in the items of the will above set forth gave to W. Q. Dickinson, who survived the testator and the life-tenant, a remainder interest in the property, which became indefensibly vested upon the death of the testator, whether item 3 of the will be construed alone or in connection with item 7. The court below properly so held, and in doing so determined, adversely to the plaintiff in error, the only issue in the case. Civil Code, § 3104; *Sumpter*v. *Carter,*115 *Ga.*893 (42 S. E. 324, 60 L. R. A. 274); *Holcombe*v. *Tufts,*7 *Ga.*538.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, escoopt Holden, J.. disqualified.*