alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### John Dowdall, Respondent, v General Motors Corporation, Doing Business as GM Powertrain Tonawanda Engine Plant, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

[823 NYS2d 723]

Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Joseph R. Glownia, J.), entered April 6, 2005 in a personal injury action. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted the motion of plaintiff seeking leave to amend the complaint to add a derivative cause of action on behalf of his wife.

*1222It is hereby ordered that the order insofar as appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the motion is denied.

Memorandum: Defendants General Motors Corporation, doing business as GM Powertrain Tonawanda Engine Plant, and Nichols Long & Moore Construction each appeal from an order insofar as it granted the motion of plaintiff seeking leave to amend his complaint to add a derivative cause of action on behalf of his wife after the expiration of the statute of limitations. We conclude that Supreme Court erred in granting plaintiffs motion. Plaintiffs wife is not named as a party in the original complaint, which does not give notice that plaintiffs wife would be asserting a claim, and thus “her cause of action [cannot] relate back to the time the action was commenced” *(Kettle v Sweet Home Cent. School Dist.,*152 AD2d 956, 957 [1989]; *see Odell v Dalrymple,*156 AD2d 967 [1989]; *Laudico v Sears, Roebuck & Co., 125*AD2d 960, 961 [1986]; *cf. Anderson v Carney,*161 AD2d 1002, 1003 [1990]). Present—Hurlbutt, A.PJ., Martoche, Centra and Pine, JJ.
### §5109. Relation of existing program

Proposals received by the Department of Energy before November 17, 1988, may be carried out without regard to changes in the management plan and research plan required by this chapter.

(Pub. L. 100–680, §10, Nov. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 4076.)
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 For purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, Robert W. Humphreys, the Chief Executive Officer of Delta Apparel, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certifies that to the best of his knowledge:  1.
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 2, 2005
of the Company, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: May 10, 2005 /s/ Robert W. HumphreysRobert W. HumphreysPresident & Chief Executive Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to Delta
Apparel, Inc. and will be retained by Delta Apparel, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 23
### §404c–11. Secretary of the Interior authorized to acquire additional lands; appropriation; approval of title

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized in his discretion to acquire for inclusion within the Mammoth Cave National Park by purchase, condemnation, or otherwise, any lands, interests in lands, and other property within the maximum boundaries thereof as authorized by sections 404 to 404b and 404c of this title, notwithstanding the provisions of sections 404b–1 and 404f of this title, or any action taken thereunder to exclude certain caves from the park area.

In order to provide for acquisition of property on behalf of the United States, in accordance with the provisions of this section, there is authorized to be appropriated the sum of not to exceed $350,000. Any of the funds appropriated pursuant to the provisions hereof which are not needed to acquire property as authorized by this section may, in the discretion of the Secretary of the Interior, be used to acquire lands and interests in lands required for the development of a proper and suitable entrance road to Mammoth Cave National Park, as authorized in section 404c–12 of this title. The funds heretofore deposited in the Treasury under special fund receipt account 146664 shall, upon June 30, 1948, be transferred to the general fund of the Treasury as miscellaneous receipts: Provided, That no part of this authorization shall be used for road development or construction until after all the lands within the maximum boundaries, as authorized by sections 404 to 404b and 404c of this title, have been acquired by purchase, condemnation or otherwise.

The title to lands, interests in lands, and other property to be acquired pursuant to this Act shall be satisfactory to the Secretary of the Interior. Any property acquired pursuant to said sections upon acquisition by the Federal Government, shall become a part of the park, and shall be subject to all laws and regulations applicable thereto.

(June 5, 1942, ch. 341, §11, 56 Stat. 319; June 30, 1948, ch. 764, 62 Stat. 1165.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 404c of this title, referred to in text, was omitted from the Code.

This Act, referred to in text, is act June 5, 1942, which is classified to sections 404c–1 to 404c–12 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Amendments

1948—Act June 30, 1948, amended section to provide for an appropriation of $350,000 to acquire additional cave lands.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<MULTIPLIER>      1

       
<S>                                <C>       
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                     APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       JUN-30-1998                     
<CASH>                                   8,139
<SECURITIES>                            20,000                             
<RECEIVABLES>                        1,009,045                          
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0                    
<INVENTORY>                              9,950                          
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     1,548,510                     
<PP&E>                                  73,501                                 
<DEPRECIATION>                         (37,259)                    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       1,935,038                         
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  329,339          
<BONDS>                                      0                                
<COMMON>                               215,000                           
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0          
<PREFERRED>                                  0                  
<OTHER-SE>                             948,391                      
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         1,935,038     
<SALES>                              1,027,392                                 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     1,027,392          
<CGS>                                  200,622                         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          157,826                  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0          
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0          
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      (2,881)          
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        668,944                   
<INCOME-TAX>                               (25)                            
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          0          
<DISCONTINUED>                               0                     
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0             
<CHANGES>                                    0                            
<NET-INCOME>                           650,137                         
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              .24                     
<EPS-DILUTED>                              .07                       
        

</TABLE>
*

 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local

Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30970

Summary Calendar

LLOYD P. LARRIEU,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

NEW ORLEANS AVIATION BOARD,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Louisiana

(95-CV-2270)

February 13, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, DAVIS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Lloyd Patrick Larrieu appeals an adverse summary judgment in his action

claiming ownership of approximately 1492 acres of land within the perimeters of

the New Orleans International Airport. Our review of the record and briefs
2

discloses no error in the trial court’s disposition. On the basis of the undisputed

facts found, authorities cited, and reasoning of the trial judge in his comprehensive

Orders and Reasons entered herein on August 13, 1996, we AFFIRM.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Energy West, Incorporated for the year ended June 30, 2003, I, John C. Allen,
Interim Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of Energy West,
Incorporated, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 'SS' 1350, as adopted
pursuant to 'SS' 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended, June 30, 2003 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended June 30, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Energy West, Incorporated.


Date: October 9, 2003              /s/ John C. Allen
                                   -------------------------------
                                   John C. Allen
                                   Interim President and Chief Executive Officer
                                   (principal executive officer)


[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Energy West, Incorporated and will be retained by Energy West,
Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request]
§ 55.6 Coverage under section 203(c). ( a ) *Coverage formula.* There are four ways in which a political subdivision can become subject to section 203(c).[2] ( 1 ) *Political subdivision approach.* A political subdivision is covered if— ( i ) More than 5 percent of its voting age citizens are members of a single language minority group and are limited-English proficient; and
( ii ) The illiteracy rate of such language minority citizens in the political subdivision is higher than the national illiteracy rate.
( 2 ) *State approach.* A political subdivision is covered if— ( i ) It is located in a state in which more than 5 percent of the voting age citizens are members of a single language minority and are limited-English proficient;
( ii ) The illiteracy rate of such language minority citizens in the state is higher than the national illiteracy rate; and
( iii ) Five percent or more of the voting age citizens of the political subdivision are members of such language minority group and are limited-English proficient.
( 3 ) *Numerical approach.* A political subdivision is covered if— ( i ) More than 10,000 of its voting age citizens are members of a single language minority group and are limited-English proficient; and
( ii ) The illiteracy rate of such language minority citizens in the political subdivision is higher than the national illiteracy rate.
( 4 ) *Indian reservation approach.* A political subdivision is covered if there is located within its borders all or any part of an Indian reservation— ( i ) In which more than 5 percent of the voting age American Indian or Alaska Native citizens are members of a single language minority group and are limited-English proficient; and
( ii ) The illiteracy rate of such language minority citizens is higher than the national illiteracy rate.
( b ) *Definitions.* For the purpose of determinations of coverage under section 203(c), *limited-English proficient* means unable to speak or understand English adequately enough to participate in the electoral process; *Indian reservation* means any area that is an American Indian or Alaska Native area, as defined by the Census Bureau for the purposes of the 1990 decennial census; and *illiteracy* means the failure to complete the fifth primary grade.
( c ) *Determinations.* Determinations of coverage under section 203(c) are made with regard to specific language groups of the language minorities listed in section 203(e).
[Order No. 1752-93, 58 FR 35372, July 1, 1993] Footnotes -
55.6
[2] The criteria for coverage are contained in section 203(b).
IIA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 28 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale 

to the United Arab Emirates of certain defense articles and services. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 5, 2019 

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. PAUL, Mr. 

LEAHY, Mr. YOUNG, and Mr. REED) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign 

Relations 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the United Arab Emirates of certain 

defense articles and services. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the following proposed foreign military sale to the 

4 United Arab Emirates is prohibited: 

5 (1) The sale of the following defense articles, 

6 including defense services and technical data, de7 scribed in Transmittal No. 17–39, submitted to Con8 gress pursuant to section 36(b) of the Arms Export 

9 Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(b)) and published in 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•SJ 28 IS 

1 the Congressional Record on June 4, 2019: The pro2 posed sale of 20 RQ–21A Blackjack Unmanned Air 

3 Vehicles (UAVs); 40 Global Positioning Systems 

4 (GPS) with Selective Availability Anti-Spoofing 

5 Module (SAASM) Type II (MPE–S); air vehicle sup6 port equipment including 8 Ground Control Stations 

7 (GCS), 4 launchers, and 4 retrievers; spare and re8 pair parts; publications; training; and technical sup9 port services. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6742

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BRYANT SHELDON JORDAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:07-cr-00207-TDS-1)

Submitted: October 14, 2021 Decided: October 19, 2021

Before DIAZ and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bryant Sheldon Jordan, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Bryant Sheldon Jordan appeals from the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(1)(B) motion for a sentence reduction under the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. 

No. 115-391, § 404, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222.

∗ We review the district court’s decision to grant 

or deny a motion under the First Step Act for abuse of discretion. See United States v. 

Jackson, 952 F.3d 492, 497, 502 (4th Cir. 2020). “A district court abuses its discretion 

when it acts arbitrarily or irrationally, fails to consider judicially recognized factors 

constraining its exercise of discretion, relies on erroneous factual or legal premises, or 

commits an error of law.” United States v. Dillard, 891 F.3d 151, 158 (4th Cir. 2018) 

(internal quotation marks omitted). We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of 

discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

∗ Although the district court granted Jordan’s motion, the reduction granted by the 

court did not reduce Jordan’s sentence to the full extent he requested.
September 21, 2017

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DOMINGO AMARO-SOLIS, Appellant

NO. 14-16-00484-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED. We further order this 

decision certified below for observance.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS RULINGS

Release No. 6905/May 4, 2023

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-20898

In the Matter of :

:

PETROTEQ ENERGY, INC., and : STAY ORDER

ALEKSANDR BLYUMKIN :

The Securities and Exchange Commission instituted this proceeding with an Order 

Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings (OIP), pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 

1933 and Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, on June 13, 2022. Pursuant to 

Respondents’ Offers of Settlement, the OIP made various findings of fact and conclusions of law;

imposed cease-and-desist orders, undertakings, remedial sanctions, and civil penalties; and ordered 

a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge to determine what, if any, disgorgement and 

prejudgment interest are appropriate as to Respondent Blyumkin. 

The Division of Enforcement and Respondent Blyumkin have jointly requested a stay 

pending Commission consideration of offer of settlement pursuant to 17 C.F.R. § 201.161(c)(2), 

stating that they have agreed in principle to a settlement on all major terms of the proceeding. 

Accordingly, the proceeding with regard to Respondent Blyumkin will be stayed, contingent upon 

compliance with 17 C.F.R. § 201.161(c)(2). 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

/S/ Carol Fox Foelak 

Carol Fox Foelak

Administrative Law Judge
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 67 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the reappointment of Risa Lavizzo-Mourey as 

a citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents 

5 of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other than 

6 Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the expira7 tion of the term of Risa Lavizzo-Mourey of Pennsylvania 

8 on February 21, 2020, is filled by the reappointment of 

9 the incumbent. The reappointment is for a term of six 

10 years, beginning on the later of February 21, 2020, or 

11 the date of enactment of this joint resolution. 

Passed the Senate January 9, 2020. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 67 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the reappointment of Risa Lavizzogents of the Smithsonian Institution. Mourey as a citizen regent of the Board of Re-
Dismissed and Opinion Filed November 30, 2015 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00941-CV 

JAYSON HOWARD MOORE, Appellant 

V. 

JAMILA VERNA BOYD, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CV15-00331 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright, and Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright 

The filing fee and docketing statement in this case are past due. By postcard dated 

August 6, 2015, we notified appellant the $195 filing fee was due. We directed appellant to 

remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so would 

result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated August 6, 2015, we notified appellant 

the docketing statement had not been filed in this case. We directed appellant to file the 

docketing statement within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so might result in 

dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, filed the docketing 

statement, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. 

 
 –2– 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). 

150941F.P05 

 

/Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

JAYSON HOWARD MOORE, Appellant 

No. 05-15-00941-CV V. 

JAMILA VERNA BOYD, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CV15-00331. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. 

Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellee JAMILA VERNA BOYD recover her costs of this appeal 

from appellant JAYSON HOWARD MOORE. 

Judgment entered November 30, 2015.
Funcionários de processamento de carne e aves

O que você pode fazer no trabalho e em casa para se proteger da COVID-19

CS 317047-Q 07/08/2020

FIQUE EM CASA se estiver doente. 

• Fique isolado em um quarto, o mais afastado possível das outras pessoas de sua casa.

• Converse com um médico e seu supervisor sobre quando você poderá voltar ao trabalho.

Fique atento a estes sintomas:

• Febre 

• Tosse 

• Falta de ar ou dificuldade para respirar

• Calafrios

• Dor muscular

• Perda repentina de paladar ou olfato

• Dor de garganta

Versão acessível: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/organizations/meat-poultry-processing-workers-employers.html

cdc.gov/coronavirus

Tente manter uma distância de 6 pés (2 metros) das outras pessoas no seu 

trabalho e em público.

• Evite ficar perto de outras pessoas em vestiários, áreas de descanso, corredores e 

entradas e saídas.

• Mantenha-se afastado de outras pessoas enquanto fala.

• Não compartilhe bebidas ou alimentos com colegas de trabalho.

Use uma máscara de pano sobre a boca e o nariz enquanto estiver no local de 

trabalho ou em público.

• Vista sua máscara justa ao rosto, porém de forma confortável, ajustando-a nas 

laterais.

• Ao retirar a máscara, evite tocar nos olhos, nariz ou boca e lave as mãos 

imediatamente.

• Lave ou substitua a máscara após o uso.

• Substitua a máscara quando estiver úmida ou suja.

• Tente manter uma distância de 6 pés (2 metros) das outras pessoas, mesmo se 

estiver usando uma máscara de pano.

• Continue usando o equipamento de proteção individual (EPI) exigido para o seu 

trabalho normal.

6 pés 

(2 metros)
cdc.gov/coronavirus

Não toque seus olhos, nariz ou boca:

• Com as mãos não lavadas

• Enquanto estiver usando luvas 

• Ao ajustar ou retirar a máscara do rosto ou os óculos de segurança

Lave suas mãos com água e sabão por pelo menos 20 segundos ou use um 

desinfetante para mãos à base de álcool que contenha pelo menos 60% de álcool:

• Antes e depois dos turnos e pausas do trabalho

• Após assoar o nariz, tossir ou espirrar

• Após usar o banheiro

• Antes de comer

• Antes e após preparar refeições

• Após colocar, tocar ou retirar a máscara de pano

 Cubra o rosto ao tossir e espirrar.

• Cubra a boca e o nariz com um lenço de papel ou com a parte interna do cotovelo.

• Jogue os lenços usados no lixo.

• Lave suas mãos ou use desinfetante para mãos logo após espirrar ou tossir.