alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 34.2 Exceptions to applicability. The following are assistance and procurement contract award situations that OJJDP considers to be outside the scope of the section 262(d)(1) competition requirement: ( a ) Assistance awards to initially fund or continue projects if the Administrator has made a written determination that the proposed program is not within the scope of any program announcement expected to be issued, is otherwise eligible for an award, and the proposed project is of such outstanding merit, as determined through peer review under subpart B of this part, that an assistance award without competition is justified (section 262(d)(1)(B)(i));
( b ) Assistance awards to initially fund or continue training services to be funded under part C, section 244, if the Administrator has made a written determination that the applicant is uniquely qualified to provide proposed training services and other qualified sources are not capable of providing such services (section 262(d)(1)(B)(ii));
( c ) Assistance awards of funds transferred to OJJDP by another Federal agency to augment authorized juvenile justice programs, projects, or purposes;
( d ) Funds transferred to other Federal agencies by OJJDP for program purposes as authorized by law;
( e ) Procurement contract awards which are subject to applicable Federal laws and regulations governing the procurement of goods and services for the benefit and use of the government;
( f ) Assistance awards from the 5% “set aside” of Special Emphasis funds under section 261(e); and
( g ) Assistance awards under section 241(f).
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 974 

To modify the authorized uses of certain property conveyed by the United 

States in Los Angeles, California. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 1, 2019 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself and Ms. HARRIS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To modify the authorized uses of certain property conveyed 

by the United States in Los Angeles, California. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORIZED USES OF CER4 TAIN PROPERTY CONVEYED BY THE UNITED 

5 STATES IN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2 of Public Law 85–236 

7 (71 Stat. 517) is amended in the first sentence by insert8 ing after ‘‘for other military purposes’’ the following: ‘‘and 

9 for purposes of meeting the needs of the homeless (as that 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 974 IS

1 term is defined in section 103 of the McKinney-Vento 

2 Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11302))’’. 

3 (b) MODIFICATION OF USE.— 

4 (1) APPLICATION.—The State of California 

5 shall submit to the Administrator of General Serv6 ices an application for use of the property conveyed 

7 by section 2 of Public Law 85–236 for purposes of 

8 meeting the needs of the homeless in accordance 

9 with the amendment made by subsection (a). 

10 (2) REVIEW OF APPLICATION.—Not later than 

11 60 days after the date of receipt of an application 

12 pursuant to paragraph (1), the Administrator and 

13 the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall 

14 jointly determine whether the use of the property de15 scribed in the application is a use for purposes of 

16 meeting the needs of the homeless. 

17 (3) MODIFICATION OF INSTRUMENT OF CON18 VEYANCE.—If the Administrator and the Secretary 

19 jointly determine that the use of the property de20 scribed in the application is for purposes of meeting 

21 the needs of the homeless, the Administrator shall 

22 execute and record in the appropriate office an in23 strument of modification of the deed of conveyance 

24 executed pursuant to Public Law 85–236 in order to 

25 authorize such use of the property. The instrument 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 974 IS

1 shall include such additional terms and conditions as 

2 the Administrator considers appropriate to protect 

3 the interests of the United States. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
§ 28.22 The requirement to preserve biological evidence. ( a ) *Applicability in general.* The requirement of section 3600A to preserve biological evidence applies to evidence that has been retained in cases in which the offense or conviction occurred prior to the enactment of section 3600A or the adoption of this subpart, as well as to evidence secured in pending and future cases.
( b ) *Limitation to circumstances in which a defendant is under a sentence of imprisonment for the offense.* The requirement of section 3600A to preserve biological evidence secured in the investigation or prosecution of a Federal offense begins to apply when a defendant is convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for the offense, and ceases to apply when the defendant or defendants are released following such imprisonment. The evidence preservation requirement of section 3600A does not apply in the following situations: ( 1 ) *Inapplicability at the investigative stage.* The requirement of section 3600A to preserve biological evidence does not apply at the investigative stage of criminal cases, occurring prior to the conviction and sentencing to imprisonment of a defendant. Biological evidence may be collected and preserved in the investigation of Federal offenses prior to the sentencing of a defendant to imprisonment, reflecting sound investigative practice and the need for evidence in trial proceedings that may result from the investigation, but section 3600A does not govern these activities.
( 2 ) *Inapplicability to cases involving only non-incarcerative sentences.* The requirement of section 3600A to preserve biological evidence does not apply in cases in which defendants receive only nonincarcerative sentences, such as probation, fines, or payment of restitution.
( 3 ) *Inapplicability following release.* The requirement of section 3600A to preserve biological evidence ceases to apply when the defendant or defendants are released following imprisonment, either unconditionally or under supervision. The requirement does not apply during any period following the release of the defendant or defendants from imprisonment, even if the defendant or defendants remain on supervised release or parole.
( 4 ) *Inapplicability following revocation of release.* The requirement of section 3600A to preserve biological evidence applies during a defendant's imprisonment pursuant to the sentence imposed upon conviction of the offense, as opposed to later imprisonment resulting from a violation of release conditions. The requirement does not apply during any period in which the defendant or defendants are imprisoned based on the revocation of probation, supervised release, or parole.
( c ) *Conditions of preservation.* The requirement of section 3600A to preserve biological evidence means that such evidence cannot be destroyed or disposed of under the circumstances in which section 3600A requires its preservation, but does not limit agency discretion concerning the conditions under which biological evidence is maintained or the transfer of biological evidence among different agencies.
EXHIBIT 10(F)*











<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(f)

                    AMENDMENT TO THE GUILFORD MILLS, INC.
                            1991 STOCK OPTION PLAN


      The first paragraph of Article II of the Option Plan is deleted in its
entirety and the following is substituted in its place in order to reflect the
increase in the number of shares authorized to be issued under the Option Plan
from 2,025,000 (the original number of shares authorized to be issued under the
Option Plan as adjusted, pursuant to the terms of the Option Plan, for two
3-for-2 stock splits) to 2,500,000:

            The total number of shares of common stock of the Company which may
            be purchased or acquired pursuant to the exercise of Options or
            Rights granted under the Plan shall not exceed, in the aggregate,
            Two Million Five Hundred Thousand (2,500,000) shares of the
            authorized common stock, $.02 par value per share, of the Company
            (the "Shares"), such number to be subject to adjustment as provided
            in Article XVIII hereof. Shares that are the subject of Rights and
            related Options shall be counted only once in determining whether
            the maximum number of Shares that may be purchased or awarded under
            the Plan has been exceeded.
**EXHIBIT
31.1**
 
 I,
Francis Mailhot, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of OSK CAPITAL II
CORP.;
 
 2. Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 (a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c) Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditor and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a) All
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 
 (b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 
 Dated: 
May 6, 2005
 
 /s/
Francis Mailhot
 
 Francis
Mailhot, Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS
ADOPTED
 PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Teleconnect Inc. (the
“Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer and President and the principal accounting and financial
officer of the Company each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 August
12, 2010
 
 /s/
      Dirk L. BenschopDirk
      L. Benschop, Sole Director, Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief
      Financial Officer and principal accounting
  officer
### §3604. Regulations and reports

#### (a) Promulgation of regulations; implementation; applicability

The Secretary of Commerce, in cooperation with the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating, shall promulgate such regulations pursuant to section 553 of title 5 as may be necessary to carry out the purposes and objectives of the Convention and this chapter, and to implement regulatory measures that are binding on the United States under the Convention. Any such regulation may be made applicable, as necessary, to all persons and all vessels subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, wherever located.

#### (b) Preparation and submission of reports by certain Secretaries

The Secretary of Commerce, in cooperation with the Secretary of the Interior, shall prepare all statements, reports, and notifications, required by articles 14 and 15 of the Convention and submit such documents to the Secretary of State for transmission to the Organization.

(Pub. L. 97–389, title III, §305, Dec. 29, 1982, 96 Stat. 1953.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of authorities, functions, personnel, and assets of the Coast Guard, including the authorities and functions of the Secretary of Transportation relating thereto, to the Department of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 468(b), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.
#### § 115.183 [Reserved]
No.AP-77.036 FILED IN COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS AUGUST 7, 2015 ABELACOSTA, CLERK In the CourtofCriminal Appeals ofTexas At Austin

No. 1412826 In the 179th District Court

OfHarris County, Texas
JUAN BALDERAS aka APACHE Appellant

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellee

STATE'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO RESCHEDULE ORAL ARGUMENT AP-77,03' COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL AUSTIN, TEXA Transmitted 8/7/2015 10:33:00 Al Accepted 8/7/2015 10:35:53 Al ABEL ACOST CLER

Tothe Honorable CourtofAppeals: This Court has scheduled that the case be submitted on oral arguments


### on September 16, 2015. The State requests thatthis Courtreschedule the oral arguments in this case for a later date. In support of this motion, the State would showthe following: 

### 1. This is a capital murder conviction for which the penalty has been assessed at death. The record in this case is extensive, as is the briefing ofthe parties.

### 2. The State's appellate counsel has a pre-paid extended international vacation covering early September. The return flight (which is 13 

### hours long) is scheduled to land in Houston at 6 pm on Monday, September 14. Assuming the flight arrives on time, that is 39 hours before the presently scheduled oral argument in this case. Factoring in jet lag, reacclimating to the central time zone, and then driving to Austin, the State's appellate counsel does not believe he will have 

### enough time to adequately prepare for argument on September 16, and, moreover, it is possible that he will not be in top mental form 

### that day. The State's appellate counsel considered using some of his vacation to prepare for argument, but the State's appellate counsel still does his reading and research on paper, and the logistics of 

### carrying around the appellate record in a death case on an extended vacation make thatoption extremelyimpractical. 

### 3. The undersigned attorney has spoken with defense counsel, Scott Shearer, and he is notopposedto rescheduling oral argument.WHEREFORE, the State prays thatthis Courtwill reschedule oral argumentfor
a date laterthan September 16. Respectfully submitted,
/s/ C.A. Morgan Clinton A. Morgan AssistantDistrictAttorney Harris County, Texas 1201 Franklin, Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77002-1923 (713)755-5826 morgan clinton(5)dao.hctx.net TBC No. 24071454CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

### Icertifythat Ihave requestedthatefile.txcourts.govelectronically serve
a copy ofthis motion to:
R. Scott Shearer shearerlegal(5)yahoo.com Counsel forAppellant

Date: August7. 2015 /s/ C.A. Morgan Clinton A. Morgan Assistant DistrictAttorney Harris County, Texas 1201 Franklin, Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77002-1923 (713) 755-5826 morgan clinton(5)dao.hctx.net TBC No. 24071454
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of AuGrid Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operation of the Company.
Date:  May 21, 2004                             By: /s/Stan Chapman
                                                    ---------------
                                                Name:  Stan Chapman
                                                Title:   Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to AuGrid  Corporation and
will be retained by AuGrid  Corporation  and  furnished  to the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Administrative Proceedings Rulings

Release No. 6855 / June 21, 2022

Administrative Proceeding

File No. 3-20898

In the Matter of

Petroteq Energy, Inc., and

Aleksandr Blyumkin

Order Scheduling 

Prehearing Conference

I ORDER that

(1) each party file with the Commission, and keep current, a notice of

appearance in accordance with 17 C.F.R. § 201.102(d);

(2) the parties confer and discuss the items listed in 17 C.F.R. § 201.221(c)

and a procedural schedule for resolving the remaining issue in the case,

including a hearing date, if necessary;

(3) the parties submit by July 20, 2022, a joint report describing the results

of the discussion, including a proposed procedural schedule; and

(4) a telephonic prehearing conference will be held on July 22, 2022, at 11:30

a.m. Eastern (8:30 a.m. Pacific). The Division of Enforcement should make

arrangements for a court reporter and circulate dial-in instructions for the

conference.

The parties are reminded to e-mail courtesy copies of any filings in this 

proceeding to alj@sec.gov in addition to complying with the Commission’s 

electronic filing requirements.

/s/ James E. Grimes 

Chief Administrative Law Judge
### §397b. Procurement of lands

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to procure, by donation or purchase, with any funds that may be available for that purpose, lands and interests in lands which may be needed for the Pu‘uhonua o Hōnaunau National Historical Park within the area described in section 397 of this title.

(July 26, 1955, ch. 385, §3, 69 Stat. 379; Pub. L. 95–625, title III, §305, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3477; Pub. L. 106–510, §3(d)(1), Nov. 13, 2000, 114 Stat. 2364.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2000—Pub. L. 106–510 substituted "Pu‘uhonua o Hōnaunau National Historical Park" for "Puuhonua o Honaunau National Historical Park".

1978—Pub. L. 95–625 redesignated as "Puuhonua o Honaunau National Historical Park" the park previously designated "City of Refuge National Historical Park".
70

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION IN THE

OF MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND

Petitioner,

Misc. Docket AG No. ___

v. September Term, 201

TONI S.L. HOLCOMB

Respondent.

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance

Commission of Maryland and Respondent, Toni S.L. Holcomb, to disbar the Respondent

from the practice of law. The Court having considered the Petition, it is this ___ day of

2019, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland;

ORDERED, that the Respondent, Toni S.L. Holcomb, be, and she hereby is, disbarred

from the practice of law in the State of Maryland for Violation of Rule 8.4 (a), (c) and (d) of

the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk ofthis Court shall remove the name ofToni S.L. Holcomb

from the register of attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to the Trustees ofthe Client

Protection Fund ofthe Bar ofMaryland and all Clerks ofall judicial tribunals in this State in

accordance with Maryland Rule 19-736(d).

Senior Judge