Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Part 63
[EPA-R09-OAR-2011-0213; FRL-9283-4]
 AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
 ACTION: Direct final rule.
 SUMMARY: EPA is amending certain regulations to reflect the current delegation status of national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) in Arizona and California. Several NESHAP were delegated to the Maricopa County Air Quality Department and the Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District within the past 12 months. The purpose of this action is to update the listing in the Code of Federal Regulations.
 DATES: This rule is effective on May 17, 2011 without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comments by April 18, 2011. If we receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         to notify the public that this direct final rule will not take effect.
 ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2011-0213, by one of the following methods: 1. 
                        *Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.*
                         Follow the on-line instructions. 2. 
                        *E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.* 3. 
                        *Mail or delivery:*
                         Andrew Steckel (AIR-4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901. *Instructions:*
                         All comments will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at 
                        *http://www.regulations.gov,*
                         including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information that 
                        ( print page 14808)
                        you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through 
                        *http://www.regulations.gov*
                         or e-mail. 
                        *http://www.regulations.gov*
                         is an “anonymous access” system, and EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send e-mail directly to EPA, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the public comment. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. *Docket:*
                         The index to the docket for this action is available electronically at 
                        *http://www.regulations.gov*
                         and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (
                        *e.g.,*
                         copyrighted material), and some may not be publicly available in either location (
                        *e.g.,*
                         CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the 
                        **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**
                         section.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mae Wang, EPA Region IX, (415) 947-4124, 
                        *wang.mae@epa.gov.*


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, “we,” “us” and “our” refer to EPA. Table of Contents I. Background A. Delegation of NESHAP B. Maricopa County Delegations C. Santa Barbara County Delegations II. EPA Action A. Maricopa County B. Santa Barbara County III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. Background A. Delegation of NESHAP Section 112(l) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA), authorizes EPA to delegate to State or local air pollution control agencies the authority to implement and enforce the standards set out in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40 (40 CFR), Part 63, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source Categories. On November 26, 1993, EPA promulgated regulations, codified at 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart E (hereinafter referred to as “Subpart E”), establishing procedures for EPA's approval of State rules or programs under section 112(l) (
                    *see*58 FR 62262). Subpart E was later amended on September 14, 2000 (
                    *see*65 FR 55810). Any request for approval under CAA section 112(l) must meet the approval criteria in 112(l)(5) and Subpart E. To streamline the approval process for future applications, a State or local agency may submit a one-time demonstration that it has adequate authorities and resources to implement and enforce any CAA section 112 standards. If such demonstration is approved, then the State or local agency would no longer need to resubmit a demonstration of these same authorities and resources for every subsequent request for delegation of CAA section 112 standards. However, EPA maintains the authority to withdraw its approval if the State does not adequately implement or enforce an approved rule or program. B. Maricopa County Delegations On March 2, 2000, EPA published a direct final action delegating to the Maricopa County Air Quality Department (Maricopa County) several NESHAP and approving Maricopa County's delegation mechanism for future standards (
                    *see*65 FR 11231). That action explained the procedure for EPA to grant future delegations to Maricopa County by letter, with periodic 
                    **Federal Register**
                     listings of standards that have been delegated. On March 5, 2010, and April 5, 2010, Maricopa County requested delegation of the following NESHAP contained in 40 CFR Part 63: Subpart WWWWW—National Emission Standards for Hospital Ethylene Oxide Sterilizers
                Subpart YYYYY—NESHAP for Area Sources: Electric Arc Furnace Steelmaking Facilities
                Subpart ZZZZZ—NESHAP for Iron and Steel Foundries Area Sources
                Subpart BBBBBB—NESHAP for Source Category: Gasoline Distribution Bulk Terminals, Bulk Plants, and Pipeline Facilities
                Subpart CCCCCC—NESHAP for Source Category: Gasoline Dispensing Facilities
                Subpart DDDDDD—NESHAP for Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers Production Area Sources
                Subpart EEEEEE—NESHAP for Primary Copper Smelting Area Sources
                Subpart FFFFFF—NESHAP for Secondary Copper Smelting Area Sources
                Subpart GGGGGG—NESHAP for Primary Nonferrous Metals Area Sources—Zinc, Cadmium, and Beryllium
                Subpart HHHHHH—NESHAP: Paint Stripping and Miscellaneous Surface Coating Operations at Area Sources
                Subpart LLLLLL—NESHAP for Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers Production Area Sources
                Subpart MMMMMM—NESHAP for Carbon Black Production Area Sources
                Subpart NNNNNN—NESHAP for Chemical Manufacturing Area Sources: Chromium Compounds
                Subpart OOOOOO—NESHAP for Flexible Polyurethane Foam Production and Fabrication Area Sources
                Subpart PPPPPP—NESHAP for Lead Acid Battery Manufacturing Area Sources
                Subpart QQQQQQ—NESHAP for Wood Preserving Area Sources
                Subpart RRRRRR—NESHAP for Clay Ceramics Manufacturing Area Sources
                Subpart SSSSSS—NESHAP for Glass Manufacturing Area Sources
                Subpart TTTTTT—NESHAP for Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing Area Sources On May 6, 2010, EPA granted delegation to Maricopa County for these NESHAP, along with any amendments to previously-delegated NESHAP, as of July 1, 2008. Subsequently, on October 7, 2010, Maricopa County requested delegation of the following NESHAP contained in 40 CFR Part 63: Subpart WWWWWW—NESHAP: Area Source Standards for Plating and Polishing Operations
                Subpart XXXXXX—NESHAP Area Source Standards for Nine Metal Fabrication and Finishing Source Categories
                Subpart YYYYYY—NESHAP for Area Sources: Ferroalloys Production Facilities
                Subpart ZZZZZZ—NESHAP: Area Source Standards for Aluminum, Copper, and Other Nonferrous Foundries On December 14, 2010, EPA granted delegation to Maricopa County for these NESHAP, along with any amendments to previously-delegated NESHAP, as of July 1, 2009. Today's action is serving to notify the public of the May 6, 2010, and December 14, 2010, delegations and to codify these delegations into the Code of Federal Regulations. C. Santa Barbara County Delegations On October 6, 2003, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) submitted on behalf of nine California districts a request for delegation of all Federal section 112 standards that apply to area sources, with the exception of the dry cleaning and chromium electroplating 
                    ( print page 14809)
                    standards for which State or local rules have already been approved (
                    *see*61 FR 25397 and 64 FR 12762). This request was approved on December 19, 2003 (
                    *see*68 FR 70726). In that approval, it was explained that future requests by other districts could be approved by letter, followed by a 
                    **Federal Register**
                     notice to codify the delegations into the CFR. On April 1, 2010, the Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District (Santa Barbara County) asked CARB to make a delegation request on their behalf for CAA section 112 area source standards. CARB submitted the request on behalf of the district on May 20, 2010. On July 30, 2010, EPA Region IX approved this request by letter, granting the Santa Barbara County the authority to implement and enforce existing area source standards unchanged as promulgated by EPA. II. EPA Action A. Maricopa County Today's document serves to notify the public of the delegation of NESHAP to Maricopa County on May 6, 2010, and December 14, 2010. Today's action will codify these delegations into the CFR. B. Santa Barbara County This document serves to notify the public that, with the exception of the dry cleaning and chromium electroplating standards, EPA granted delegation of unchanged Federal section 112 area source standards to Santa Barbara County on July 30, 2010. Today's action will codify these delegations into the CFR. Santa Barbara County will also receive delegation of any future area source standards or revisions 90 days after promulgation of these standards or revisions, unless the district chooses to decline delegation of a particular future standard by notifying the EPA Region IX office in writing. If no such notification is received, the delegation will go into effect 90 days after promulgation of the standard or revision, without any additional action from the district or EPA. Additionally, as mentioned in 74 FR 12591 (March 25, 2009), and pursuant to 40 CFR sections 63.9(a)(4)(ii) and 63.10(a)(4)(ii), EPA Region IX waives the requirement that notifications or reports for delegated area source standards be submitted to EPA as well as Santa Barbara County. III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve delegation requests that comply with the provisions of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7412(l); 40 CFR 63.91(b). Thus, in reviewing delegation submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law. For that reason, this action: Is not a “significant regulatory action” subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget underExecutive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
                Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 
                    *et seq.*);
                Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 
                    *et seq.*);
                Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
                Does not have Federalism implications as specified inExecutive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
                Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject toExecutive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
                Is not a significant regulatory action subject toExecutive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
                Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and
                Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods underExecutive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this rule does not have Tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the delegations are not approved to apply in Indian country located in the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law. The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 
                    *et seq.,*
                     as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    . A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    . This action is not a “major rule” as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by May 17, 2011. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the Proposed Rules section of today's 
                    **Federal Register**
                    , rather than file an immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements (
                    *see*
                     section 307(b)(2)). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63 Environmental protection
Administrative practice and procedure
Air pollution control
Hazardous substances
Intergovernmental relations
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
 Authority:
                    This action is issued under the authority of Section 112 of the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 7412. Dated: March 3, 2011. Deborah Jordan, Director, Air Division, Region IX.
 Title 40, chapter I, part 63 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: PART 63—[AMENDED]
 1.The authority citation for Part 63 continues to read as follows: Authority:
                        42 U.S.C. 7401, 
                            *et seq.* Subpart E—Approval of State Programs and Delegation of Federal Authorities
 2.Section 63.99 is amended as follows: a.By revising the table in paragraph (a)(3)(i); b.By revising paragraphs (a)(5)(i)(B)( *11*) and (
                        *12*); and c.By adding paragraph (a)(5)(i)(B)( *13*). § 63.99
  (a) * * * (3) * * * (i) * * * Delegation Status for Part 63 Standards—Arizona
Subpart
Description
ADEQ 1
MCAQD 2
PDEQ 3
PCAQCD 4A
General Provisions
X
X
X
XF
Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry
X
X
X
XG
Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry: Process Vents, Storage Vessels, Transfer Operations, and Wastewater
X
X
X
XH
Organic Hazardous Air Pollutants: Equipment Leaks
X
X
X
XI
Organic Hazardous Air Pollutants: Certain Processes Subject to the Negotiated Regulation for Equipment Leaks
X
X
X
XJ
Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers Production
X
X
XL
Coke Oven Batteries
X
X
X
XM
Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning
X
X
X
XN
Hard and Decorative Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks
X
X
X
XO
Ethylene Oxide Sterilization Facilities
X
X
X
XQ
Industrial Process Cooling Towers
X
X
X
XR
Gasoline Distribution Facilities
X
X
X
XS
Pulp and Paper
X
X
XT
Halogenated Solvent Cleaning
X
X
X
XU
Group I Polymers and Resins
X
X
X
XW
Epoxy Resins Production and Non-Nylon Polyamides Production
X
X
X
XX
Secondary Lead Smelting
X
X
X
XY
Marine Tank Vessel Loading OperationsAA
Phosphoric Acid Manufacturing Plants
X
X
XBB
Phosphate Fertilizers Production Plants
X
X
XCC
Petroleum Refineries
X
X
X
XDD
Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations
X
X
X
XEE
Magnetic Tape Manufacturing Operations
X
X
X
XGG
Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Facilities
X
X
X
XHH
Oil and Natural Gas Production Facilities
X
X
XJJ
Wood Furniture Manufacturing Operations
X
X
X
XKK
Printing and Publishing Industry
X
X
X
XLL
Primary Aluminum Reduction Plants
X

XMM
Chemical Recovery Combustion Sources at Kraft, Soda, Sulfite, and Stand-Alone Semichemical Pulp Mills
X
X
XOO
Tanks—Level 1
X
X
X
XPP
Containers
X
X
X
XQQ
Surface Impoundments
X
X
X
XRR
Individual Drain Systems
X
X
X
XSS
Closed Vent Systems, Control Devices, Recovery Devices and Routing to a Fuel Gas System or a Process
X
X
XTT
Equipment Leaks—Control Level 1
X
X
XUU
Equipment Leaks—Control Level 2
X
X
XVV
Oil-Water Separators and Organic-Water Separators
X
X
X
XWW
Storage Vessels (Tanks)—Control Level 2
X
X
XXX
Ethylene Manufacturing Process Units: Heat Exchange Systems and Waste Operations
X
X
XYY
Generic MACT Standards
X
X
XCCC
Steel Pickling
X
X
XDDD
Mineral Wool Production
X
X
XEEE
Hazardous Waste Combustors
X
X
XGGG
Pharmaceuticals Production
X
X
XHHH
Natural Gas Transmission and Storage Facilities
X
X
XIII
Flexible Polyurethane Foam Production
X
X
XJJJ
Group IV Polymers and Resins
X
X
X
XLLL
Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry
X
X
XMMM
Pesticide Active Ingredient Production
X
X
XNNN
Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing
X
X
XOOO
Manufacture of Amino/Phenolic Resins
X
X
XPPP
Polyether Polyols Production
X
X
XQQQ
Primary Copper Smelting
X
X
XRRR
Secondary Aluminum Production
X
X
XTTT
Primary Lead Smelting
X
X
XUUU
Petroleum Refineries: Catalytic Cracking, Catalytic Reforming, and Sulfur Recovery Units
X
X
XVVV
Publicly Owned Treatment Works
X
X
XXXX
Ferroalloys Production
X
X
X( print page 14811)AAAA
Municipal Solid Waste Landfills
X
X
XCCCC
Manufacturing of Nutritional Yeast
X
X
XDDDD
Plywood and Composite Wood Products
X
X
XEEEE
Organic Liquids Distribution (non-gasoline)
X
X
XFFFF
Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing
X
X
XGGGG
Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Production
X
X
XHHHH
Wet-Formed Fiberglass Mat Production
X
X
XIIII
Surface Coating of Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks
X
XJJJJ
Paper and Other Web Coating
X
X
XKKKK
Surface Coating of Metal Cans
X
X
XMMMM
Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products
X
X
XNNNN
Large Appliances
X
X
XOOOO
Printing, Coating, and Dyeing of Fabrics and Other Textiles
X
X
XPPPP
Surface Coating of Plastic Parts and Products
X
XQQQQ
Wood Building Products
X
X
XRRRR
Surface Coating of Metal Furniture
X
X
XSSSS
Surface Coating of Metal Coil
X
X
XTTTT
Leather Finishing Operations
X
X
XUUUU
Cellulose Products Manufacturing
X
X
XVVVV
Boat Manufacturing
X
X
XWWWW
Reinforced Plastics Composites Production
X
X
XXXXX
Tire Manufacturing
X
X
XYYYY
Stationary Combustion Turbines
X
X
XZZZZ
Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines
X
XAAAAA
Lime Manufacturing Plants
X
X
XBBBBB
Semiconductor Manufacturing
X
X
XCCCCC
Coke Oven: Pushing, Quenching and Battery Stacks
X
X
XDDDDD
Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boiler and Process Heaters
X
XEEEEE
Iron and Steel Foundries
X
X
XFFFFF
Integrated Iron and Steel
X
X
XGGGGG
Site Remediation
X
X
XHHHHH
Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing
X
X
XIIIII
Mercury Emissions from Mercury Cell Chlor-Alkali Plants
X
X
XJJJJJ
Brick and Structural Clay Products Manufacturing
X
X
XKKKKK
Clay Ceramics Manufacturing
X
X
XLLLLL
Asphalt Roofing and Processing
X
X
XMMMMM
Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication Operation
X
X
XNNNNN
Hydrochloric Acid Production
X
X
XPPPPP
Engine Test Cells/Stands
X
X
XQQQQQ
Friction Products Manufacturing
X
X
XRRRRR
Taconite Iron Ore Processing
X
X
XSSSSS
Refractory Products Manufacturing
X
X
XTTTTT
Primary Magnesium Refining
X
X
XWWWWW
Hospital Ethylene Oxide Sterilizers

X
XYYYYY
Area Sources: Electric Arc Furnace Steelmaking Facilities

X
XZZZZZ
Iron and Steel Foundries Area Sources

X
XBBBBBB
Gasoline Distribution Bulk Terminals, Bulk Plants, and Pipeline Facilities

X
XCCCCCC
Gasoline Dispensing Facilities

X
XDDDDDD
Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers Production Area Sources

X
XEEEEEE
Primary Copper Smelting Area Sources

X
XFFFFFF
Secondary Copper Smelting Area Sources

X
XGGGGGG
Primary Nonferrous Metals Area Sources—Zinc, Cadmium, and Beryllium

X
XHHHHHH
Paint Stripping and Miscellaneous Surface Coating Operations at Area Sources

X
XLLLLLL
Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers Production Area Sources

X
XMMMMMM
Carbon Black Production Area Sources

X
XNNNNNN
Chemical Manufacturing Area Sources: Chromium Compounds

X
XOOOOOO
Flexible Polyurethane Foam Production and Fabrication Area Sources

X
XPPPPPP
Lead Acid Battery Manufacturing Area Sources

X
XQQQQQQ
Wood Preserving Area Sources

X
XRRRRRR
Clay Ceramics Manufacturing Area Sources

X
XSSSSSS
Glass Manufacturing Area Sources

X
XTTTTTT
Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing Area Sources

X
XWWWWWW
Area Source Standards for Plating and Polishing Operations

XXXXXXX
Area Source Standards for Nine Metal Fabrication and Finishing Source Categories

XYYYYYY
Area Sources: Ferroalloys Production Facilities

X( print page 14812)ZZZZZZ
Area Source Standards for Aluminum, Copper, and Other Nonferrous Foundries

X1
                                 Arizona Department of Environmental Quality.2
                                 Maricopa County Air Quality Department.3
                                 Pima County Department of Environmental Quality.4
                                 Pinal County Air Quality Control District.
 (5) * * * (i) * * * (B) * * * (
                            *11*) Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District. (
                            *12*) Ventura County Air Pollution Control District. (
                            *13*) Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District.


[FR Doc. 2011-6425 Filed 3-17-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P