alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 42.403 Agency regulations. ( a ) Any federal agency subject to title VI which has not issued a regulation implementing title VI shall do so as promptly as possible and, no later than the effective date of this subpart, shall submit a proposed regulation to the Assistant Attorney General pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section.
( b ) Any federal agency which becomes subject to title VI after the effective date of this subpart shall, within 60 days of the date it becomes subject to title VI, submit a proposed regulation to the Assistant Attorney General pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) Regarding issuance or amendment of its regulation implementing title VI, a federal agency shall take the following steps: ( 1 ) Before publishing a proposed regulation of amendment in the Federal Register, submit it to the Assistant Attorney General, Civil Rights Division;
( 2 ) After receiving the approval of the Assistant Attorney General, publish the proposed regulation or amendment in the Federal Register for comment;
( 3 ) After final agency approval, submit the regulation or amendment, through the Assistant Attorney General, to the Attorney General for final approval. (Executive Order 12250 delegates to the Attorney General the function, vested in the President by section 602 of title VI, 42 U.S.C. 2000d-1, of approving title VI regulations and amendments to them.)
( d ) The title VI regulation of each federal agency shall be supplemented with an appendix listing the types of federal financial assistance, i.e., the statutes authorizing such assistance, to which the regulation applies. Each such appendix shall be kept up-to-date by amendments published, at appropriate intervals, in the Federal Register. In issuing or amending such an appendix, the agency need not follow the procedure set forth in paragraph (c) of this section.
[Order No. 670-76, 41 FR 52669, Dec. 1, 1976, as amended by Order No. 960-81, 46 FR 52357, Oct. 27, 1981]
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
  





 
 March 11, 2016 

Chadwick M. Cornell 
 11712 Mount Curve Road 

Eden Prairie, MN 55347 
 Dear Chad: 

On behalf of HeartWare International, Inc., I am pleased to advise you that the Nominating and Governance Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors
your appointment as a Director of HeartWare. 
 The Board discussed your appointment at its March meeting. Following the March meeting, and pending your
acceptance of this offer, the Board voted unanimously by written consent to expand the number of Board members and to appoint you to fill the vacancy created by that action. Accordingly, pending your acceptance, you are invited to attend the next
Board meeting scheduled to be held on June 2, 2016. 
 HeartWare non-executive Directors receive a retainer in the amount of $60,000 per annum plus
incremental annual retainers for service on Board Committees. In addition, non-executive Directors are granted 1,000 Restricted Stock Units upon appointment plus 1,000 Restricted Stock Units and 1,000 Options to purchase HeartWare shares annually.

 We plan to disclose your appointment in a press release and a Current Report on Form 8K upon your acceptance. Prior to the June meeting, we will request
information from you in connection with our required filings with the SEC and NASDAQ. We will also provide you with a copy of our Insider Trading Policy and similar materials. Attached for your information is a schedule of the 2016 Board and
Committee meeting dates. The live meeting dates contemplate Committee meetings the afternoon before the date indicated followed by a Board dinner. 
 Please
do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns you might have. 
 With highest regards, 

/s/ Douglas Godshall 
 Douglas Godshall 

Chief Executive Officer 
  

	
	 ACCEPTED AND AGREED on this
 11th day of
March, 2016.

	
	/s/ Chadwick M. Cornell
	Chadwick M. Cornell



  

							
	500 Old Connecticut Path, Framingham, MA 01701 USA	  	            T 508.739.0950	  	            F 508.739.0948	  	            www.heartware.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000043512
<NAME> GREAT WESTERN FINANCIAL CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         837,292
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             125
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               275,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  7,916,705
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,886,736
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,941,918
<LOANS>                                     30,250,198
<ALLOWANCE>                                    362,849
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              44,586,764
<DEPOSITS>                                  29,234,928
<SHORT-TERM>                                 8,184,709
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,083,726
<LONG-TERM>                                  3,260,925
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    294,375
<COMMON>                                       137,279
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,390,822
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              44,586,764
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,412,145
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              806,496
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                44,278
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             3,262,919
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,217,085
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,936,582
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,326,337
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  187,700
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              13,543
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,019,975
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                422,122
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     261,022
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   261,022
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.71
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.30
<LOANS-NON>                                    486,524
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               108,385
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               438,051
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  281,567
<RECOVERIES>                                    18,665
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              362,849
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           362,849
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                    SAMPLE STOCK CERTIFICATE


      INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                      LORELEI CORPORATION

    AUTHORIZED CAPITAL STOCK 20,000,000 COMMON SHARES $.001


  THIS CERTIFIES THAT                     is the owner of fully paid
and non-assessable Shares of the Capital Stock of the above named Corporation
transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person
or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly
endorsed.

  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate
to be signed by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate Seal to be
hereunto affixed this                                 day of A.D. 200




  ___________________                     ___________________
       Secretary                               President
§ 401.74 Form and contents of report. ( a ) *Generally.* A request for a report under this subpart may require such information and the answers to such questions as may be reasonably pertinent to the subject of the action or determination under consideration.
( b ) *Waste loading.* In cases involving objections to an allocation of the assimilative capacity of a stream, wasteload allocation for a point source, or load allocation for a new point source, the report shall be signed and verified by a technically qualified person having personal knowledge of the facts stated therein, and shall include such of the following items as the Executive Director may require: ( 1 ) A specification with particularity of the ground or grounds for the objection; and failure to specify a ground for objection prior to the hearing shall foreclose the objector from thereafter asserting such a ground at the hearing;
( 2 ) A description of industrial processing and waste treatment operational characteristics and outfall configuration in such detail as to permit an evaluation of the character, kind and quantity of the discharges, both treated and untreated, including the physical, chemical and biological properties of any liquid, gaseous, solid, radioactive, or other substance composing the discharge in whole or in part;
( 3 ) The thermal characteristics of the discharges and the level of heat in flow;
( 4 ) Information in sufficient detail to permit evaluation in depth of any in-plant control or recovery process for which credit is claimed;
( 5 ) The chemical and toxicological characteristics including the processes and/or indirect discharges which may be the source of the chemicals or toxicity;
( 6 ) An analysis of all the parameters that may have an effect on the strength of the waste or impinge upon the water quality criteria set forth in the regulations in this chapter, including a determination of the rate of biochemical oxygen demand and the projection of a first-stage carbonaceous oxygen demand;
( 7 ) Measurements of the waste as closely as possible to the processes where the wastes are produced, with the sample composited either continually or at frequent intervals (one-half hour or, where permitted by the Executive Director, one hour periods), so as to represent adequately the strength and volume of waste that is discharged; and
( 8 ) Such other and additional specific technical data as the Executive Director may reasonably consider necessary and useful for the proper determination of a wasteload allocation.
[62 FR 64158, Dec. 4, 1997, as amended at 63 FR 45943, Aug. 28, 1998]
### §3344. Construction with other laws

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed—

(1) to diminish Federal, State, or tribal jurisdiction, responsibility, or rights in the field of resource enhancement and management, or control of water resources, submerged lands, or navigable waters; nor to limit the authority of Congress to authorize and fund projects; or

(2) as superseding, modifying, or repealing any existing applicable law, except as provided for in this section.

(Pub. L. 96–561, title I, §143, Dec. 22, 1980, 94 Stat. 3286.)
EXHIBIT 10(c)

<PAGE>
                                       2


                               827109 ALBERTA LTD.
              #255 - 999 - 8TH STREET, SW, CALGARY, ALBERTA T2R 1J5
                     PH: (403) 244-7300 FAX: (403) 244-7211





                                                               September 2, 1999





Delta Capital Technologies Inc.
c/o B201, 1331 Homer Street
Vancouver, BC  V6B 5M5

Dear Sirs:

With   reference  of  the  License   Agreement   between   827109  Alberta  Ltd.
("AlbertaCo") and Delta Capital  Technologies Inc.  ("DeltaCap"),  dated June 1,
1999, Section 5(a),  Consideration,  "a lump-sum fee of $50,000.00 (CAD) payable
within sixty (60) days from the  effective  date of this  Agreement",  we hereby
acknowledge receipt of $20,000.00 (CAD).

Further,  we grant a three (3) month  extension  to DeltaCap  for payment of the
balance of funds in the amount of $30,000.00 until November 1, 1999.

Yours truly,

827109 ALBERTA LTD.


/s/ "Paul Davis"

Paul Davis
President
### §1891c. United States catch history

In establishing catch allocations under international fisheries agreements, the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating, and the Secretary of State, shall ensure that all catch history associated with a vessel of the United States remains with the United States and is not transferred or credited to any other nation or vessel of such nation, including when a vessel of the United States is sold or transferred to a citizen of another nation or to an entity controlled by citizens of another nation.

(Pub. L. 109–479, title IV, §407, Jan. 12, 2007, 120 Stat. 3634.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Reauthorization Act of 2006, and not as part of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act which comprises this chapter.
Sanitized Purity 

Data on Second 

Process 

Material
C 

2017 Reinsurance Data 

National Totals By Fund 

As of 10/2021 

Fund Gross Liability Gross Premium Gross Indemnity Retained Liability * 

A 11,333,735,826 1,471,871,770 1,420,875,189 2,119,408,609 

94,966,563,406 8,604,884,797 4,247,259,112 88,749,975,980 

Total 106,300,299,232 10,076,756,567 5,668,134,301 90,869,384,588 

Footnotes: * Includes 6.5% Net Book Quota Share. 

Retained Premium * Retaine

275,240,024 

8,037,899,755 8,313,139,779 

Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Quotemedia, Inc. (the Company)
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Keith J. Randall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my best knowledge and
belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        
|------------------------
|By: /s/ Keith J. Randall
|Keith J. Randall        
|Chief Financial Officer 
|May 15, 2007
#### State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Dennis Shea, appellant.

301 N.W.2d 602

Filed February 6, 1981.

No. 43496.

Toney J. Redman for appellant.

Norman Langemach, Jr., City Prosecutor, for appellee.

Heard before Krivosha, C.J., Boslaugh, McCown, Clinton, Brodkey, White, and Hastings, JJ.

Boslaugh, J.

The defendant, Dennis Shea, upon a plea of guilty, was convicted in municipal court of operating a motor vehicle while his Nebraska operator’s license was suspended in violation of the municipal code of the city of Lincoln, Nebraska. He was sentenced to 30 days in jail and his driving privileges were suspended for 1 year. Upon appeal to the District Court, the judgment was affirmed.

*18The defendant has appealed and contends the sentence imposed was unconstitutionally excessive.

The section of the municipal code under which the defendant was sentenced, apparently § 10.52.040(c) according to the briefs, does not appear in the record. This court will not take judicial notice of an ordinance which does not appear in the record, and the existence of a valid ordinance creating the offense charged will be presumed where the ordinance is not properly set forth in the record. *State v. Long,*206 Neb. 446, 293 N.W.2d 391 (1980).

We have examined the record and presentence report and find that the sentence imposed was not excessive.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.
## Appendix F. 

## Sample 

# T-REX Model (Version 1.3.1, December, 2006) 

# Output
Summary of Risk Quotient CalculationsBased on Upper Bound Kenaga EECs

Size class not used for dietary risk quotients Table X. Upper Bound Kenaga, Acute Avian DoseBased Risk Quotients

Size 

### class not used for dietary risk quotients SueClass (grams)



# 1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 

# 11111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 

# 1111 2080436 Adjusted LD50 EECs and RQs

Table X Upper Bound Kenaga, Acute Mammalian Dose-Based Risk Quotients Short Grass

20 100 1000

EECs and RQs Size Class Tall Grass

1440.86 1834.29 2591.00

Adjusted BroadleafPlants/ 

### Insects

59.72 34.05 15.25 Fruits/Pods/ Seeds/ Large Insects

0.04 0.02 0.01 27.37 15.61 6.99 0.02 0.01 0.00 33.59 19.16 8.58 0.02 0.01 0.00 3.73 2.13 0.95 0.00 0.00 0.00

### Size class not used for 

### dietary risk quotients



### Size class not used for dietary risk quotients
Table 

### X Upper Bound Kenaga, ChronicMammalian Dose-Based Risk Quotients
Size Class (grams)


### 15 35 1000 Adjusted 

### NOAEL

155.39 125.72 54.38 EECs and RQs Short Grass EEC 

### 49.99 34.55 8.01 RQ 

### 0.32 0.27 0.15 Tall Grass EEC 

### 22.91 15.84 3.67 RQ 

### 0.15 0.13 0.07 BroadleafPlants1 Insects EEC 

### 28.12 19.44 4.51 RQ 

### 0.18 0.15 0.08 Fruits/Pods/ Seeds1 Large Insects EEC 

### 3.12 2.16 0.50 Granivore RQ 

### 0.02 0.02 0.01 EEC 

### 0.69 0.48 0.11 RQ 

### 0.00 0.00 0.00Size class not used for dietary risk quotients

Size class not used fordie- risk quotients Table 

### X. Mean Kenaga, Acute Avian DoseBased Risk Quotients

Size Class (gram)



### 20 100 lo00

Table 

### X Mean Kenaga, Acute Mammalian Dose-Based Risk Quotients Adjusted 

### LD~O

1440.86 1834.29 2591.00 EECs and RQs

Size Class (grams)


### 15 35 Adjusted LD~O



### 4395.66 3556.56 Short Grass
EEC 

### 21.17 12.07 5.39 Tall Grass Broadleaf Plants/ Small Insects

EECs and RQs Fruits/Pods/ Seeds1 LargeInsects RQ 

### 0.015 0.007 0.002 EEC 

### 8.97 5.11 2.28 EEC 

### 11.21 6.39 2.85 EEC 

### 1.74 0.99 0.44 RQ 

### 0.006 0.003 0.001 RQ 

### 0.008 0.003 0.001 RQ 

### 0.001 0.001 0.000

Short Grass EEC 

### 17.64 12.26 Tall Grass Broadleaf Plants/ Small Insects RQ 

### 0.004 0.003 EEC 

### 7.47 5.19 EEC 

### 9.34 6.49 RQ 

### 0.002 0.001 RQ 

### 0.002 0.002 FruitsIPodsl Seeds1 Large Insects EEC 

### 1.45 1.01 Granivore RQ 

### 0.000 0.000 EEC 

### 0.32 0.23 RQ 

### 0.00 0.00

### Size class not used 

### for dietary

### risk quotients

Size class not used for dietary risk quotients
Table 

### X Mean Kenaga, ChronicMammalianDoseBased Risk Quotients Size Class (grams)
15
- 

### 35 1000 Adjusted 

### NOAEL

155.39 125.72 54.38 EECs and RQs Short Grass EEC 17.64 12.26 2.79 RQ 0.11'4 0.097 0.051 TaIl Grass EEC 7.47 5.19 1.18 RQ 0.048 0.041 0.022 BroadleafPlants/ Small Insects EEC 9.34 6.49 1.47 RQ 0.060 0.052 0.027 Seeds/ Large Insects EEC 1.45 1.01 0.23 Granivore RQ 0.009 0.008 0.004 EEC 0.32 0.23 0.05 RQ 0.00 0.00 0.00
#### Brooks *v.*The State.

April 15, 1910.

Indictment for murder. Before Judge Koan. Fulton superior court.

January 15, *1910.*

*H. J. Boswell*and *Philip W. Davis,*for plaintiff in error.

*John C. Hart, attorney-general, C. D. Hill, solicitor-general,*and *D. K. Johnston,*contra.

Atkinson, J.

The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict. There was no error in the charge of the court, or in any ruling made during the progress of the trial, sufficient to require the grant of a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### § 1317.130 Effect of employment opportunities.

The obligation to comply with these Title IX regulations is not obviated or alleviated because employment opportunities in any occupation or profession are or may be more limited for members of one sex than for members of the other sex.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 29, 2011

p0321 

# Order

March 29, 2011

142214

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142214 COA: 293070 Oakland CC: 2008-223667-FC JEAN CARLOS CINTRON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 2, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
## NUMBER 13

- 20

- 00 501

- CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

STEVEN WAYNE LANDRUM , Appellant ,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

.

On a ppeal from the 3 6 th District Court of Aransas County, Texas.



## ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Tijerina Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on a ppellate counsel ’s Anders 1 brief and motion to

withdraw as counsel. Pursuant to Kelly v. State , appellate counsel has informed the Court

that she notified appellant of her filing of the Anders brief and motion to withdraw. See

1 See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967).2

Kelly v. State , 43 6 S.W.3d 313 , 319 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). In addition, appellate counsel

stated that she sent a copy of the record directly to appellant. See id . at 320 n.22

(recognizing that appellate counsel sometimes sua sponte send the record to the

appellant). The record in this case includes two volumes of the reporter ’ s record, the

clerk’s record, the first supplemental clerk’s record, Exhibit V3, and State’s exhibit A,

which is a video.

In Kelly , the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals held that appellate counsel must

“ assist the appellant in filing a motion in the court of appeals for access to the appellate

record if that is indeed what the appellant wants ,” and that “[o] nce such a motion is filed,

the court of appeals has the ultimate responsibility to make sur e that, one way or

another

. . . the appellant is granted access to the appellate record so that he may file his

response.

. . .” Id. at 315 . The Kelly court noted that sometimes however “ when the

appellate record is not voluminous, appellate counsel will sua sponte send a copy of the

appellate record to the appellant along with the Anders brief and motion to withdraw. ” In

that case, the Kelly court stated that “ the court of appeals could then simply issue an

order requiring the appellant to file his response to the Anders brief by a date certain. ” Id

.

at 320 n.22.

Here, appellate counsel has sua sponte provided the record to appellant along with

the Anders brief and motion to withdraw

. A ccordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that

appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this order to file his pro se response

to the Anders brief with this Court if he so chooses. See Id. The State shall have twenty3

days thereafter to file its response, if any

.
PER CURIAM

Do not publish. T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the 21st day of May , 202 1

.