alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Daniel R. Luis, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of GoAmerica, Inc.;

2.       Based  on my  knowledge,  this  report  does  not  contain  any  untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.       Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.       The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and  procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions   about  the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5.       The registrant's other certifying  officer and I have disclosed,  based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial  reporting,  to
the registrant's  auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         (a) All significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal  control over financial  reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that  involves  management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: August 12, 2004

                                         /s/ Daniel R. Luis
                                         ------------------
                                         Daniel R. Luis
                                         Chief Executive Officer
CAIR Allowance Status| Business | Clean Air Markets | Air & Radiation Home | US EPA

http://epa.gov/airmarkets/business/cairallowancestatus.html[6/24/2011 5:54:30 PM]

EPA Home Privacy and Security Notice Contact Us

http://epa.gov/airmarkets/business/cairallowancestatus.html

Print As-Is

Last updated on Tuesday, April 14, 2009

You are here: EPA Home Air & Radiation Clean Air Markets Doing Business With Us CAIR Allowance

Status

Clean Air Markets

Recent Additions | Contact Us Search: All EPA This Area

Trading of CAIR Allowances

EPA has received questions about the status of CAIR allowances allocated for 2009 and

subsequent years.

Summary of Court actions

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has ruled on petitions for review of the Clean Air

Interstate Rule (CAIR) and CAIR Federal Implementation Plans (FIPs), including their provisions

establishing the CAIR NOX annual and ozone season and SO2 trading programs. On July 11, 2008,

the Court issued an opinion vacating and remanding these rules; however, parties to the litigation

requested rehearing of aspects of the Court's decision, including the vacatur of the rules. On

December 23, 2008, the Court granted rehearing only to the extent that it remanded the rules to

EPA without vacating them.

Current status of CAIR programs

The December 23, 2008 ruling leaves CAIR and the CAIR FIPs -- including the CAIR trading

programs -- in place until EPA issues a new rule to replace CAIR in accordance with the July 11,

2008 decision. EPA informed the Court that development and finalization of a replacement rule

could take about two years.

Future year allowances

EPA is continuing to record allowance allocations under the CAIR NOX trading programs, in some

cases for years beyond the estimated two-year period for promulgation of a replacement rule. EPA

is taking these actions consistent with the State or federal rule that applies. When making any

decisions on, and arrangements for, purchasing or selling CAIR NOX allowances, prospective buyers

and sellers should keep in mind the potential impact that the status of CAIR and any replacement

rule may have on the value of the allowances, particularly those allocated for years after the

expected finalization of a replacement rule. EPA's continued recording of CAIR NOX allowances does

not guarantee or imply that any allowances will continue to be usable for compliance after a

replacement rule is finalized or that they will continue to have value in the future.

Air & Radiation

Home

Clean Air Markets

Home

Basic Information

Where You Live

About Acid Rain

Doing Business

With Us

Programs and

Regulations

Progress and

Results

Cap and Trade

Allowance Trading

Emissions

Monitoring

Data and Maps

Environmental

Issues

Resource Center

Meetings and

Workshops

Related Links

Share
• There is currently no vaccine to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

• The best way to prevent illness is to avoid being exposed to this virus.

• The virus is thought to spread mainly from person to person.

» Between people who are in close contact with one

another (within about 6 feet).

» Through respiratory droplets produced when an infected

person breathes, coughs, or sneezes.

» These droplets can land in the mouths or noses of people who

are nearby or possibly be inhaled into the lungs.

CS316248B 04/08/2020

cdc.gov/coronavirus

PERSONS EXPERIENCING HOMELESSNESS

How to Protect Yourself 

KNOW HOW COVID-19 SPREADS

6 ft

TAKE STEPSTO PROTECT YOURSELF

• Wash your hands often with soap and water for at least 

20 seconds, especially after you have been in a public place,

or after blowing your nose, coughing, or sneezing.

• Avoid touching your eyes, nose, and mouth with

unwashed hands.

• Put distance between yourself and other people if 

COVID-19 is spreading in your community.
# Fo **urth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas** 

November 6, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00286

- CV

Jimmy MASPERO and Regina Maspero, Individually, and as Next Friends of Wyitt Maspero, Wynnsday Maspero, Wesley Maspero, Deceased, and Walter Maspero, Deceased, Minor Children

, Appellant s

v.

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO

, Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014CI14946 Honorable David Peeples, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

After we granted Appellee’s first motion for an extension of time to file the brief, the brief was due on November 7, 2018. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(b), (d). Before the due date, Appellee filed an unopposed second motion for extension of time to file the brief until November 28, 2018.
Appellee’s motion is GRANTED. Appelle e ’s brief is due on November 28, 2018.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 6th day of November, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
§ 50.1 Definitions. As used in this part: *Affected landowners* include owners of property interests, as noted in the most recent county/city tax records as receiving the tax notice, whose property: ( 1 ) Is directly affected (*i.e.*, crossed or used) by the proposed activity, including all facility sites, rights-of-way, access roads, staging areas, and temporary workspace; or
( 2 ) Abuts either side of an existing right-of-way or facility site owned in fee by any utility company, or abuts the edge of a proposed facility site or right-of-way which runs along a property line in the area in which the facilities would be constructed, or contains a residence within 50 feet of a proposed construction work area.
*Director* means the Director of the Office of Energy Projects or his designees.
*Environmental justice community* means any community that has been historically marginalized and overburdened by pollution. Environmental justice communities include, but may not be limited to, minority populations, low-income populations, or indigenous peoples.
*Federal authorization* means permits, special use authorizations, certifications, opinions, or other approvals that may be required under Federal law in order to site a transmission facility.
*Indian Tribe* means an Indian Tribe that is recognized by treaty with the United States, by Federal statute, or by the U.S. Department of the Interior in its periodic listing of Tribal entities in the Federal Register in accordance with 25 CFR 83.6(a), and whose Tribal interests may be affected by the development and operation of the proposed transmission facilities.
*National interest electric transmission corridor* means any geographic area that is experiencing electric energy transmission capacity constraints or congestion that adversely affects consumers or is expected to experience such energy transmission capacity constraints or congestion, as designated by the Secretary of Energy.
*Permitting entity* means any Federal or State agency, Indian Tribe, or multistate entity that is responsible for issuing separate authorizations pursuant to Federal law that are required to construct electric transmission facilities in a national interest electric transmission corridor.
*Stakeholder* means any Federal, State, interstate, or local agency; any Indian Tribe; any affected landowner; any environmental justice community member; or any other interested person or organization.
*Transmitting utility* means an entity that owns, operates, or controls facilities used for the transmission of electric energy in interstate commerce for the sale of electric energy at wholesale.
[71 FR 69465, Dec. 1, 2006, as amended at 89 FR 46730, May 29, 2024]
================================================================================

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report of Amexdrug Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jack Amin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Jack Amin
-----------------------
Jack Amin
Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2011



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 42 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 42

 Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed export to the 
   United Arab Emirates and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and 
Northern Ireland of certain defense articles, including technical data 
                         and defense services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2019

Mr. Menendez (for himself, Mr. Graham, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Paul, Mr. Leahy, 
  Mr. Young, and Mr. Reed) introduced the following joint resolution; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed export to the 
   United Arab Emirates and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and 
Northern Ireland of certain defense articles, including technical data 
                         and defense services.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the issuance of an export 
license with respect to any of the following proposed exports to the 
United Arab Emirates and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and 
Northern Ireland is prohibited:
            (1) The transfer to the United Arab Emirates and to the 
        United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland of the 
        following defense articles, including technical data and 
        defense services, described in Executive Communication 1421 
        (EC-1421) submitted to Congress pursuant to section 36(c) of 
        the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(c)) and published 
        in the Congressional Record on June 3, 2019: The proposed 
        technical assistance agreement with Armed Forces of the United 
        Arab Emirates to transfer defense articles, defense services, 
        and technical data to support preparation shipment, delivery, 
        and acceptance of the Guidance Enhanced (GEM-T) in support of 
        the Patriot Program for end use by the Government of the United 
        Arab Emirates.
                                 <all>
```
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 01, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 01, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A22I0011. JUDY E. OSOWA v. ALEXANDER E. OSOWA.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

19A02446
Order entered February 2 4 , 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 01131
- CR RAY DON WILSON, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 291st Ju di cial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F18
- 75289
- U



### O RDER
Before the Court is the February 19 , 2020 second request for additional time filed by court reporter Sasha Brooks

. We GRANT the request and ORDER the reporter’s record fil ed on
or before March 20 , 2020. Ms. Brooks is cautioned that further ext ensions are di sfavored.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 32 

Expressing the sense of Congress that attacks on cultural sites are war 

crimes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 7, 2020 

Mr. MARKEY (for himself, Ms. WARREN, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. REED, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. WYDEN, and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that attacks on cultural 

sites are war crimes. 

Whereas attacking cultural sites is illegal under the Geneva 

Conventions and the 1954 Hague Convention for the 

Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed 

Conflict; and 

Whereas, on January 6, 2020, Secretary of Defense Mark T. 

Esper expressed that the United States would not target 

Iranian cultural sites, as the United States ‘‘follow[s] the 

laws of armed conflict’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That attacks on cultural sites are war crimes. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cedar Grove Marketing, Inc.,
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  B.
Stephen Bailey,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge  and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: September 4, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Eugene L. Dominick, as Administrator, etc., of Jacob Stern, Deceased, Appellant, v. Ida B. Stern, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
Open Meeting of the 

SEC Advisory Committee on Improvements to Financial Reporting 

Multipurpose Room, Room L006, SEC Headquarters 

Washington, D.C. 

Friday, January 11, 2008, Beginning at 9:30 A.M. 

AGENDA 

I. Introductory Remarks – Robert Pozen, Committee Chairman 

II. International Considerations 

III. Discussion of Developments since November Meeting 

A. Subcommittee 4 – Delivering Financial Information 

B. Subcommittee 3 – Audit Process and Compliance 

C. Subcommittee 2 – Standard-Setting Process 

D. Subcommittee 1 – Substantive Complexity 

IV. Vote on Proposal to Publish Progress Report 

V. Next Steps and Future Timetable 

VI. Planning for March Meeting 

VII. Adjournment (expected no later than 3:30 pm)
##### 



EXHIBIT (23)(a)

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated December 5, 2003, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements and schedule included in the
Annual Report of Guilford Mills, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form 10-K
for the year ended September 28, 2003. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration
Statement of Guilford Mills, Inc. on Form S-8 (File
No. 33-105954,
effective June 9, 2003).

| |  |                       
| |  | ----------------------
| |  | /s/ Grant Thornton LLP





Greensboro, North Carolina
December 29, 2003
#### § 17.29 Documents of permanent historical value.

The original classification authority, to the greatest extent possible, shall declassify classified information contained in records determined to have permanent historical value under title 44 of the United States Code before they are accessioned into the National Archives. The Department shall cooperate with the National Archives and Records Administration in carrying out an automatic declassification program involving accessioned Department records, presidential papers, and historical materials under the control of the Archivist of the United States.
### §404b–2. Eventual acquisition of Great Onyx and Crystal Caves; cooperation with State of Kentucky

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to cooperate with the State of Kentucky for the purpose of arranging for the eventual acquisition by the United States of the Great Onyx Cave and the Crystal Cave within the authorized boundaries of Mammoth Cave National Park. The Secretary shall deposit to the credit of a special receipt account that portion of the annual admission, guide, and elevator fee receipts from the said park which exceeds the annual amount available to the park for management, guide, and protection purposes, which funds so deposited may be expended thereafter in payment for the purchase of said cave properties. The Secretary is further authorized to enter into such contracts and agreements as he may determine to be necessary to effectuate the acquisition of the cave properties as authorized herein.

(Mar. 27, 1954, ch. 114, 68 Stat. 36.)