alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 51.59 Redistricting plans. ( a ) *Relevant factors.* In determining whether a submitted redistricting plan has a prohibited purpose or effect the Attorney General, in addition to the factors described above, will consider the following factors (among others): ( 1 ) The extent to which malapportioned districts deny or abridge the right to vote of minority citizens;
( 2 ) The extent to which minority voting strength is reduced by the proposed redistricting;
( 3 ) The extent to which minority concentrations are fragmented among different districts;
( 4 ) The extent to which minorities are over concentrated in one or more districts;
( 5 ) The extent to which available alternative plans satisfying the jurisdiction's legitimate governmental interests were considered;
( 6 ) The extent to which the plan departs from objective redistricting criteria set by the submitting jurisdiction, ignores other relevant factors such as compactness and contiguity, or displays a configuration that inexplicably disregards available natural or artificial boundaries; and
( 7 ) The extent to which the plan is inconsistent with the jurisdiction's stated redistricting standards.
( b ) *Discriminatory purpose.* A jurisdiction's failure to adopt the maximum possible number of majority-minority districts may not be the sole basis for determining that a jurisdiction was motivated by a discriminatory purpose.
[Order No. 3262-2011, 76 FR 21249, Apr. 15, 2011]
Exhibit 99
                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Investors Insurance Group, Inc.(the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2000 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Donald F. U. Goebert, Chief Executive Officer  and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
           or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
           of the Company.

                                      /s/ Donald F. U. Goebert
                                      ------------------------
                                      Donald F. U. Goebert
                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                      Chief Financial Officer

                                      August 14, 2002
### §410bbb–6. Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 103–433, title XII, §1208, Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4525.)
§ 5.306 Exemption under section 3(g) of the Act. For the purpose of section 3(g) of the Act— ( a ) Attempts to influence or persuade agency personnel or officials other than in the course of judicial proceedings, criminal or civil law enforcement inquiries, investigations, or proceedings, or agency proceedings required by statute or regulation to be conducted on the record, shall include only such attempts to influence or persuade with reference to formulating, adopting, or changing the domestic or foreign policies of the United States or with reference to the political or public interests, policies, or relations of a government of a foreign country or a foreign political party; and
( b ) If an attorney engaged in legal representation of a foreign principal before an agency of the U.S. Government is not otherwise required to disclose the identity of his principal as a matter of established agency procedure, he must make such disclosure, in conformity with this section of the Act, to each of the agency's personnel or officials before whom and at the time his legal representation is undertaken. The burden of establishing that the required disclosure was made shall fall upon the person claiming the exemption.
[Order No. 376-67, 32 FR 6362, Apr. 22, 1967, as amended by Order No. 463-71, 36 FR 12212, June 29, 1971; Order No. 2674-2003, 68 FR 33630, June 5, 2003]
#### John Eukone v. O’Rourke Engineering and Construction Company.

— Motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carlos Torres, Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 280]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (James A. Yates, J.), rendered June 16, 2004, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of rape in the first degree and third degrees, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of five years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility.

Defendant raised an issue at trial as to whether he could have attacked the victim in the manner in which she alleged, given that she was bigger than him. Accordingly, the court properly exercised its discretion in admitting expert testimony about defendant’s training, as a peace officer with a New York City agency, in restraint techniques *(see generally People v Taylor,*75 NY2d 277 [1990]). The expert testimony was relevant, and it was not likely to be within the knowledge of the average juror. The testimony about the relationship between gender differences and upper body strength was improperly received as such knowledge was within the ken of the average juror. However, such error was harmless.

Defendant did not preserve his challenge to testimony that the victim saw him in possession of a firearm and in a police-type uniform on various occasions before the incident, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Furthermore, without concluding the testimony was erroneously admitted, any possible prejudice to defendant was eliminated by the court’s limiting instructions, which included, among other things, a statement that defendant’s possession of a weapon was lawful.

Defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims are *352unreviewable on direct appeal because they involve matters outside the record concerning trial counsel’s strategic choices *(see People v Rivera,*71 NY2d 705, 709 [1988]; *People v Love,*57 NY2d 998 [1982]). On the existing record, to the extent it permits review, we find that defendant received effective assistance under the state and federal standards *(see People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 713-714 [1998]; *see also Strickland v Washington,*466 US 668 [1984]). With respect to defendant’s claim that his trial counsel should have made various objections, we conclude that such objections would have been unavailing, and that counsel’s failure to make them did not cause defendant any prejudice or deprive him of a fair trial. Concur— Friedman, J.E, Sullivan, Nardelli, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 14, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 8325]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3364]

[[Page 8325]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Sixth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 225, Rechargeable Lithium 
Batteries and Battery Systems, Small and Medium Size

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 225, Rechargeable Lithium 
Batteries and Battery Systems, Small and Medium Size.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
sixth meeting of RTCA Special Committee 225, Rechargeable Lithium 
Batteries and Battery Systems, Small and Medium Size.

DATES: The meeting will be held February 28-29, 2012, from 9 a.m.-5 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC, 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC, 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-
9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 225. The agenda will 
include the following:

February 28, 2012

 Welcome, Introductions, and Administrative Remarks
 Review of the meeting agenda.
 Review and approval of summary from the 5th plenary meeting.
 Review SC-225 schedule for Plenaries, working group meetings, 
and document preparation.
 Review action items.
 Review of current events with Li-Ion Batteries (15 min).
 Results of EFB thermal runaway on flightdeck (smoke and toxic 
gases).
 RTCA Workspace Demo.
 Discuss title of DO-3xx.
 Working Group Meeting--Review draft document.
 Battery Size Table (1.3.1) updates:
     Add row for large size.
     Add Wh equation.
 Review new action items.
 Review agenda for Wednesday.

February 29, 2012

 Review of meeting agenda, other actions.
 Verify dates of next plenary and upcoming meeting working 
group meetings.
 Establish Agenda for 7th plenary meeting.
 Working Group Meeting--Review draft document
 Working Group report, review progress and actions.
 Review all action items.
 Adjourn.

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 7, 2012.
Kathy Hitt,
Program Analyst, Business Operations Branch, Federal Aviation 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-3364 Filed 2-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
### §410gg–5. Authorization of appropriations; entrance or admission fees prohibition

In addition to the sums previously authorized to be appropriated for Biscayne National Monument, there are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary for the administration of the park, and not to exceed $8,500,000 for the acquisition of lands and interests therein, as provided in this subchapter. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no fees shall be charged for entrance or admission to the park.

(Pub. L. 96–287, title I, §106, June 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 600.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Authorizations Effective October 1, 1980; Contractual, Obligatory, and Payment Authority Provided in Appropriations

Pub. L. 96–287, title IV, §401, June 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 602, provided that: "Authorizations of moneys to be appropriated under this Act [Pub. L. 96–287] shall be effective October 1, 1980. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, authority to enter into contracts to incur obligations, or to make payments under this Act shall be effective only to the extent, and in such amounts, as are provided in advance in appropriation Acts."
#### § 540.60 Purpose and scope.

The Bureau of Prisons recognizes the desirability of establishing a policy that affords the public information about its operations via the news media. Representatives of the news media (see § 540.2) may visit institutions for the purpose of preparing reports about the institution, programs, and activities. It is not the intent of this rule to provide publicity for an inmate or special privileges for the news media, but rather to insure a better informed public. The Bureau of Prisons also has a responsibility to protect the privacy and other rights of inmates and members of the staff. Therefore, an interview in an institution must be regulated to insure the orderly and safe operation of the institution.
#### § 11.2 Private counsel debt collection program.

The Assistant Attorney General for Administration, in consultation with the Executive Office for United States Attorneys, shall designate the districts that will participate in the program. U.S. Attorneys in the districts chosen for the program, shall direct the full cooperation and assistance of their respective offices in implementing the program. Among other things, the U.S. Attorneys shall designate an Assistant U.S. Attorney to serve as the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) on the contracts with private debt collection lawyers in their respective districts. The CORs will be responsible for assisting the contracting officer by supervising the work of the private counsel in their respective districts and providing necessary approvals with respect to the initiation or settlement of lawsuits or similar matters.

[Order No. 1201-87, 52 FR 24449, July 1, 1987, as amended by AG Order 3689-2016, 81 FR 43943, July 6, 2016]
IIA 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 81 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to prohibit 

the use of slavery and involuntary servitude as a punishment for a crime. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 2, 2020 

Mr. MERKLEY (for himself, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, and Mr. SANDERS) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to prohibit the use of slavery and involuntary 

servitude as a punishment for a crime. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 81 IS 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude may be 

3 imposed as a punishment for a crime.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6613

NIKITA RAY STEWART,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GENE M. JOHNSON,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, Magistrate

Judge. (3:06-cv-00080)

Submitted: October 11, 2007 Decided: October 16, 2007

Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nikita Ray Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate

judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Nikita Ray Stewart seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s

order*

 denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Stewart has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
건강 경계주의보:

코로나바이러스 감염증 2019(COVID-19)

귀하는 최근에 크루즈선 또는 리버 크루즈에 탑승하셨습니다. 

COVID-19는 사람 간에 전파되는 호흡기 관련 질환입니다.

크루즈선이나 리버 크루즈에서 하선

한 시점부터 14일 동안 집에 머무르

시고 사회적 거리두기를 실천하세요.

아래 절차에 따라 자신의 건강상태를 

관찰하고 사회적 거리두기를 실천하세요.

1.	하루에 두 번씩 체온계로 체온을 측정하고

발열이 있는지 관찰하세요. 또한 기침이나

호흡 곤란이 있는지 확인하세요.

2.	집에 머무르시고 다른 사람과의 접촉을

피하세요. 14일 동안 출근이나 등교를 하지

마세요. 직장에 복귀하기 전에 고용주와 근무

상황을 상의하세요.

3.	사회적 거리두기를 실행하는 동안에는

대중교통, 택시, 공유 차량을 이용하지 마세요.

4.	혼잡한 장소(쇼핑센터, 영화관 등)를 피하시고,

공공장소에서의 활동을 제한하세요.

5.	다른 사람들과 거리를 유지하세요 (약 6피트/

2미터).

증상이 나타나는 경우 할 일

발열(100.4°F/38°C 이상), 기침 또는 

호흡 곤란이 발생할 경우:

•	의사의 진료를 받으세요. 병원이나

응급실을 방문하기 전에 전화를 하세요.

•	최근의 여행 이력과 증상을 의사에게

알리세요.

•	다른 사람과의 접촉을 피하세요.

투석과 같은 다른 이유로 치료를 받아야

하는 경우, 의사에게 미리 전화하여 최근에

크루즈선 또는 리버 크루즈로 여행한

사실을 알려주세요.

건강상태 관찰에 대한 추가 질문이

있으시면 지역 공중보건 담당자에게

연락하세요.

건강상태 관찰 및 지역 공중보건 담당자에게 연락하는 방법에 대한 상세 

정보는 다음을 참조하세요. 상세 정보: www.cdc.gov/COVIDtravel

CS 316043A 2020년 3월 17일 오후 9:56
§ 524.42 Content of progress reports. Staff shall include the following in each progress report: ( a ) Institution (full name) and Date;
( b ) Type of Progress Report;
( c ) Committed name;
( d ) Registration number;
( e ) Age;
( f ) Present security and custody level;
( g ) Offense(s) for which committed;
( h ) Sentence;
( i ) Date sentence began;
( j ) Time served to date, including jail time credit;
( k ) Good conduct time/Extra good time earned;
( l ) Statutory good time withheld or forfeited; Disallowed good conduct time;
( m ) Projected release date;
( n ) Most recent Parole Commission action, including any special conditions or requirements (if applicable);
( o ) Detainers and pending charges on file;
( p ) Institutional adjustment; this ordinarily includes information on the inmate's: ( 1 ) Program plans;
( 2 ) Work assignments and skills acquired;
( 3 ) Educational/vocational participation;
( 4 ) Counseling programs;
( 5 ) Incident reports;
( 6 ) Institutional movement;
( 7 ) Physical and mental health, including any significant mental or physical health problems, and any corrective action taken; and
( 8 ) Financial responsibility.
( q ) Release planning: ( 1 ) Where appropriate, staff shall request that the inmate provide a specific release plan;
( 2 ) Staff shall identify available release resources (including CCC) and any particular problem that may be present in release planning.
[59 FR 6857, Feb. 11, 1994]
§ 33.30 Program criteria. The Justice Assistance Act requires that block grant funds assist states and local governments to carry out specific programs which offer a high probability of improving the functioning of the criminal justice system, with special emphasis on violent crime and serious offenders. Section 403(a) of the Act. ( a ) *High probability of improving the criminal justice system. High probability of improving the criminal justice system* means that a prudent assessment of the concepts and implementation plans included in a proposed program, project, approach, or practice, together with an assessment of the problem to which it is addressed and of data and information bearing on the problem, concept, and implementation plan, provides strong evidence that the proposed activities would result in identifiable improvements in the criminal justice system if implemented as proposed. Section 901(a)(21) of the Act.
( b ) *Special emphasis on violent crime and serious offenders. Special emphasis on violent crime and serious offenders* means that a relationship exists between the program and violent crime, the victims of violent crime, serious offenders and their acts, and the prevention of violent crime and serious offenses. Violent crime, for the purpose of this program, includes homicide, robbery, assault, arson, residential burglary, child abuse and molestation, sexual assault, kidnapping, and all felonies involving weapons or narcotics trafficking. Serious offenders are those who commit violent crimes.
( c ) *Criminal justice. Criminal justice* means activities pertaining to crime prevention, control, or reduction, or the enforcement of the criminal law, including but not limited to, police efforts to prevent, control, or reduce crime or to apprehend criminals, including juveniles, activities of courts having criminal jurisdiction, and related agencies (including but not limited to prosecutorial and defender services, juvenile delinquency agencies, and pretrial service or release agencies), activities of corrections, probation or parole authorities and related agencies assisting in the rehabilitation, supervision, and care of criminal offenders, and programs relating to the prevention, control, or reduction of narcotic addiction and juvenile delinquency. Section 901(a)(1) of the Act.
#### § 36.602 General rule.

On the application of a State or local government, the Assistant Attorney General may certify that a code meets or exceeds the minimum requirements of the Act for the accessibility and usability of places of public accommodation and commercial facilities under this part by issuing a certification of equivalency. At any enforcement proceeding under title III of the Act, such certification shall be rebuttable evidence that such State law or local ordinance does meet or exceed the minimum requirements of title III.
EXHIBIT
32.2




Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
adopted pursuant to Section 906of
the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Teliphone Corp.. (the “Company”) on Form
10–Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George Metrakos, Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:




1.      
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.      
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.






/s/
      George MetrakosGeorge
      Metrakos
                Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
### §410aaa–5. Grazing

#### (a) In general

The privilege of grazing domestic livestock on lands within the park shall continue to be exercised at no more than the current level, subject to applicable laws and National Park Service regulations.

#### (b) Sale of property

If a person holding a grazing permit referred to in subsection (a) informs the Secretary that such permittee is willing to convey to the United States any base property with respect to which such permit was issued and to which such permittee holds title, the Secretary shall make the acquisition of such base property a priority as compared with the acquisition of other lands within the park, provided agreement can be reached concerning the terms and conditions of such acquisition. Any such base property which is located outside the park and acquired as a priority pursuant to this section shall be managed by the Federal agency responsible for the majority of the adjacent lands in accordance with the laws applicable to such adjacent lands.

(Pub. L. 103–433, title III, §306, Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4486.)