ACME BRICK

COMPANY I)ENTON• TEXAS EMISSIONS •I'ESTING
Tunnel Kiln Scrubber Common Stack Compliance

Testing Hydrogen Chloride Hydrogen Fluoride

November 9 t•, 2005 File Number

05-8018

Prepared For: Mr. Mike O'Connor Acme Brick Company 2821 West Seventh Street Fort Worth, Texas 76107 Voice (817) 332-4101 x 348 WESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

AND TESTING, INC. Employee Owned and Operated

P.O. Box 1626 2626 Hunter Road, Suite 106 San Marcos, Texas 78666 Phone: (307)234-5511 Toll-Free: (800) 545-5711 Fax: (512) 234-8324 E-maih jcrowder@testair.com

_¢•Project Manager
Alan D. t•'ance PrUdentTABLE OF CONTENTS

L INTRODUCTION

AND RESULTS

SUMMARY II. TEST RESULTS IIL TEST PROCEDUI•S IV. SOURCE

EMISSIONS

CALCULATIONS 12411

LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Table 2: Table 3: Table 4: Common

Stack Results Summary Common Stack % Moisture

and Flow Rate Common Stack Hydrogen

Chloride

and Hydrogen

Fluoride Sampling Locations 1235

LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Moisture

Sampling

Train Figure 2: FTIR Sampling

System

LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Field Testing Data Appendix B Computer

Data Entry Appendix C FTIR Analytical

Data Appendix D Calibration

of Equipment Appendix E Resumes

of Test PersonnelAcme Brick Company Denton, TX

I. INTRODUCTION

AND RESULTS

SUMMARY
Western Environmental

Services

and Testing,

Inc. (Western

Environmental)

of Casper, Wyoming conducted

a Stack Emissions

Survey at the Acme Brick Company's

facility in Denton, Texas November

9 th, 2005. The purposes

of this testing was to show compliance

for the emissions of Hydrogen

Chloride

(HC1) and Hydrogen

Fluoride

(I-W) on the Common

Stack in. accordance with the Texas Commission

of Environmental

Quality

(TCEQ)

Permit #56094.

A summary

of the results are listed on the tables below:

Source

Common Stack Table 1: Common Stack Results

Summary Parameter Cyclonic Flow

Results 5.2 ° Limits20 ° Hydrogen Chloride

0.3619 lb/hr •. f•[ Hydrogen Fluoride

0.0807 lb/hr

1.9 lb/hr
Individual and average

emissions

and test parameters

from the runs conductea

on the common stack listed in Tables 2 and 3.

Western Environmental

Services and Testing, Inc.

05-8018Table 2 Common Stack % Moisture

and Flow Rate

Acme Brick Company I3•nton, Texas

Test Parameters Pb• (Baromeaic Pressure, absolute) Y (Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor) Cp (Pitot tube Coetticient) Dn (Diameter of Nozzle) q (Total Sampling Time of Test) DH (Orifice Pressure Drop) V (Volume of Dry Gas Sampled as measured) T= (Gas Meter Temperature,

avg0 V• (Condensate

impingers and silica gel) Location/Process Parameters A• (Cross-sectional

Area of Stack) Pg (Static Pressure of Stack Gas) 3", (Tem•

of S•k Gas) ,/•p (Sq. root of velocity head of gas) CO2 (Carbon Dioxide) o• (Oxygen) N2 (Nitrogen) Calculations Vm• (Gas Sampled, standard conditions (std)) V• 0Vater Vapor in Gas Sampled, std) B• (Water Vapor in Gas, Proportion by VoL) Satw'ated Moisture in •tack gas, by volume Gd (Proportion of Dry Gas in stack)
EA (Excess Air) • (Molecular Weight of Dry Stack Gas) l• (Molecular Weight of Wet Stack Gas) P. (Pressure of Stack Gas, Absolute) Flow Result• V• (Average Stack Gas Vdo•ity) Q,d (Dry Volumetric FlowRate, std.) Q• (Measured Volumetric Flow Rate, Actual) Run Number:. Sta.q Date./Time

11/9/2005 9:42 11/9/2005 11:15 Stop Date/Time

11/9/2005 10:42 11/9/2005 12:15 Onita In. Hg

29.35

29.35

29.35

29,35 dimensionless !.0050

1,0050

1.0050

1.0050 dimensionleas 0.840

0.840

0.840

0.840 Inches #DIV/0! Minutes 60.0

60.0

60.0

60.0 In. H20

0.65

0.65

0.65

0.65 it3 (dD')

28.174

27.995

28.323

28.164 Degr, F

75

114

85

92 ml or g

46.9

•.6

44.4

45.3 ft2 37.57

37,57

37,57

37.57 In. H20

-0.58

-0.58

-0.58

.-0.58 Deg. F

403

401

403 In. H20

0.6783

0.6580

0.6770

0.6711 % 2.2

2

2.2

2.1 % 17.2

17.4

17.4 % 80.6

80.6

80.4

80.5

%%%% Ib/Ib-mole ib/lb-mole In. Hg
fi/m (fpm) fia/m (dscfin) l'•/m (cfln) 11/9/2005 12:40 1/9/2005 13:40

27.442.217.45 1964.6992.642229.0428.2229.31

298562205 112151 25.412.107.63 1923.t792.444929.0228.1829.31

289560332 108765

27.10

26.65 2.09 2.13 7.16 7.41 1975.42 1954.43 92.8 92.59 455 441.73 29.05 29.03 28.26 28.22 29.31 29.31

2978 2953 62223 •!557 111895 110937

Western Environmental

Services and Testing, Inc.

05-8018 2Table 3 Common Stack Hydrogen Chloride

and Hydrogen

Fluoride
Run Number:

•

3

4

StartDateffime 11/9/2005 9:44 11/9/2005 11:19 StopDatefgime 11/9/2005 10:44 !1/9/2005 12:19 11/9/2005 12:44 1119/'2005 13:44 Aeme BdckCompany Denton, Texas

Average

Flow Results Qs• (Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, ski.) Bws.( Water Vapor in Gas, Proportion by Vol.)

fi3/m (dscfm)

62205

60332

62223 % 7.45

7.63

7.16

61587 7.41 Hydrogen Chloride Concentration dry ppmd

1.0366

1.0486

1.0198

1,0350 Emissions lb/hr

0.3661

0.3592

0.3603

0•3619

H dr en Fluoride Conoentration dry ppmd

0.5171

<0.377

<0.367

0A202 Emissions lb/hr

0.1002

<0.071

<0.071

0•0807
A less than sign represents

the quanitifed concentration

value was less than the detection limit. Therefore the detection limit is reported as con

Western Environmental

Services and Testing, Inc.

05-8018 3Acme Brick Company Denton, TX

III. TEST PROCEDURES
The sampling

and analytical

procedures

used followed

the procedures

outlined

by the Appendix to the Code of Federal Re•,

Title 40, Parts 60 and 63. A brief description

of each method is provided

below.
Part 60, Ap__oendlx

A Method 1

"Sample

and Velocity

Traverses

for Stationary

Sources" Method 2

"Determination

of Stack Gas Velocity

and Volumetric

Flow Rate" Method 3

"Gas Analysis

for the Determination

of Dry Molecular

Weight" Method 4

"Determination

of Moisture

Content

in Stack Gas"
Part 63, Appendix

A Method 320

"Measurement

of Vapor Phase Organic

and Inorganic

Emissions

by Extractive Fourier Transformed

Infrared

(FTIR) Spectroscopy" Sampling Point Determination

(Method

1) EPA Method

1 was used to determine

the location

of velocity

sampling

points. Stack sampling points are based on the stack diameter

and the distance

from the sampling

ports to flow disturbances. The sampling

traverse

points are listed in Table 4.

Western Environmental

Services and Testing, Inc.

05-8018 4Table 4 Sampling Locations Common Stack Inside Stack Diameter

83 inches Port and Wall Thickness

3 1/4 inches Sample % of Inches from Point No. Diameter

Wall 2.1 I•A 2 6.7

5 9/16 3 11.8

9 13/i6 4 17.7

14 5 25.0

203/, 6 35.6

29 9/16 7 64.4

53 7/16 8 75.0

62 9 82.3

68 10 88.2

73 3/16 11 93.3

77 12 97.0

81 Acme Brick Company Denton, TX

Velocity and Flow Rate Determination

(Method

2) Velocity and temperature

were measured

at the points determined

by Method

1 during the test
rtms. Wind tunnel calibrated

Pitot tubes were used to measure

velocity

head. Type K thermocouples with digital pyrometers

were used to measure

temperature.

Cyclonic

flow was determined prior to testing using the test points listed in Table 4. The average

cyclonic

flow was less than twenty degrees

as stipulated

in Method

2. The cyclonic

flow results are shown in Table 1 and Appendix

A.

Western Environmental

Services and Testing, Inc.

05-8018 5Acme Brick Company Denton, TX Carbon Dioxide•

Oxygen•

and Dry Molecular

Weight

Determination

(Method

3) A portion of the gas from the"sampling

trains was collected

in Tedlar bags. Analysis

of carbon dioxide (CO2) and oxygen (02) were performed

with an Orsat Gas Analyzer.

Dry molecular weight was calculated

from CO2 and 02.concentrations.
Moisture Content

Determination

(Method

4) Three one hour moisture

runs were performed

in conjunction

with the FTIR testing.

Run I was discounted from the report due to process

changes

occurring

during the test. A fourth test was performed to achieve the required

three one hour test runs. Water entrained

in the stack gas was condensed and collected

in chilled impingers.

The volume of gas sampled

was measured

with a calibrated dry gas meter. Moisture

content was calculated

from the gas and liquid volumes.

A diagram of the moisture

sampling

train is shown in Figure 1.

Heated Stainless Impinger Train

.-•--- Temperature Steel Probe Sensor Sensors
Type S Pitot Filter Tube Manometer IceBath

Temperature Sensors
Orific•

By-Pass Valve SilicaGel

Vacuum Gauge

Manome er•

Dry Gas Meter Main ValveAir Tight Pump Figure 1 Moisture Sampling

Train

Western Environmental

Services and Testing, Inc.

05-8018 6Acme Brick Company Denton, TX Fourier Transform

Infrared

Monitor

(FTIR). Pollutant concentrations

were quantified

in accordance

with EPA Reference

Method

320. Test contaminants measured

and reported

using the FTIR included

Hydrogen

Chloride

and Hydrogen Fluoride.

Western Environmental

operates

an extractive

Fourier transform

infrared

(FTIR) spectrometer manufactured by Industrial

Monitor

and Control

Corporation

(IMACC)

of Austin, Texas. The FTIR is composed

of fourmain

systems;

the analytical

bench, the cell, analytical

software,

and extractive sampling

system.

® The IMACC

FTIR operates

on a Nicolet bench with a zinc selenide

beam splitter,

HeNe laser, an IR source, and an MCT-A

detector.
The cell is composed

of objective

and field mirrors,

which are gold plated. The cell is designed as part of the FTIR unit, which is capable of operating

at a path length ofl0
meters. The cell Volume is 2.728 liters. The cell is operated

at a temperature

of 185°C and is coated with nickel to prevent

corrosion.

Analytical

system leak checks were performed prior to any testing.

Results of the leak check are provided

on the field data sheets contained

in the Appendices.

The analytical

software

used by Western

Environmental

is Nicolet based software

with IMACC modifications

to improve

the software

suitability

for extractive

FTIR monitoring. The primary

software

main programs

utilized

in the collection

of data are Omnic and IMACC.

All Graphical

presentation

during sampling

was performed

by Concview.
The extractive

sampling

system is composed

of a heated probe and heated filter assembly operated, at 185 ° C. The filter assembly

was connected

to a heated sample line that delivers the sample to the FTIR cell. The sample was drawn through

the cell at 10 liters per minute by a heated sample pump connected

to the exhaust

port of the ceil.

Western Environmental

Services azld Testing, Inc.

05-8018 7Acme Brick Company Denton, TX Heated Sample(T,e•n•

Heated Filter

Heated Glass Probe

•

Stack Wall _• .•,

with port

Air Tight Pump/

Figure 2 FTIR Sampling

System
This method applies to the analysis

of vapor phase organic or inorganic

compounds,

which absorb energy in the mid-infrared

spectral

region, about 400 to 4500 cm 1 (25 to 2.5 lam), This method is used to determine

compound-specific

concentrations

in a multi-component

vapor phase sample, which is contained

in a closed-path

gas cell. Spectra

of samples.are

collected using double beam infrared

absorption

spectroscopy.

Omnic software

is used to analyze

the sample spectra and report the compound

concentrations. Analytical range and sensitivity

depend on the frequency-dependent analyte absorptivity,. instrument configuration,

data collection

parameters,

and gas stream compoSition.

Instrument factors include:

® spectral resolution,
® interferometer

signal averaging

time
® detector

sensitivity

and response,

and
® absorption

path length. An estimate

of gas composition

was made based on previous

test data, and during preliminary screening. The spiking for hydrogen

chloride

was performed

in accordance

with EPA 320 in that

Western Environmental

Services and Testing, Inc.

05-8018 8Acrne Brick Company Denton, TX
the spike value was based on preliminary

observations

and expected

concentrations.

Spiking

for Hydrogen Chloride

has been demonstrated

on similar sources in past test survey's

and was not performed during this testing.

Optimal

resolution

for the IMACC

unit is 0.5 cm-1. Instrumental configuration was selected

based upon manufacturer

suggestions

and previous

experience. Spectral interferants

were identified

using the selected

band areas.from

reference

spectra and interferant spectra.

Analytical

method development

included

linearization

of compounds

over the range of detection,

line shift adjustment,

and inclusion

of interferants.

The baseline

noise of the system was measured

in each analytical

region to dete•anine

the Maximum

Analytical Uncertainty (MAU) of the instrument

configuration

for the analyte(s)

of interest. The error bars listed in the concentration

files represent

three times the standard

deviation

of the residual spectra after the interferants

have been removed

and the component

of interest is quantified and removed.

Therefore,

the quantitation

limit is the mean of the error bar divided by three. For the purposes

of this testing the reporting

limit is three times the standard

deviation

of the test data and is represented

as the error bar: A hard copy of the analytical

methodology

may be found in the Appendices

to this report.

In extractive

sampling

a probe assembly

and pump is used to extract gas from the exhaust of the
source and transport

the sample to the FTIR gas cell. The sampling

apparatus

is similar to that used for a single-component

emissions

monitor.

The digitized

infrared

spectrum

of the sample in the FTIR gas cell is measured

and stored on a computer

with a backup stored on a separate disk. A copy of the spectral

data is included

in this report.
Pre and Post Test Evaluations Pre- and Post-test

CTS (calibration

transfer

standard)

spectra were gathered

and evaluated. Pre: and Post-test

NEA (Noise Equivalent

Absorbance)

and Background measurements were made for each source.

Pre-Test

QA Spiking

was performed

for hydrogen Chloride,

at a similar source in accordance

with 40CFR63

National Emission Standards

For Hazardous

Air Pollutants

For Brick and Structural

Clay Products Manufacturing

published

May 16, 2003, and is included

in the Appendices.

Western Environmental

Services and Testing, Inc.

05-8018 9Acrne Brick Company Denton, TX Three independent

spectra were gathered

at the source prior to testing.

Spike flow rate was 1 liter per minute as measured

by a mass flow controller.

An independent sample is one that is gathered

after 5 cell volumes

have passed through

the cell (Section 8.6.2 Method

320). Because

the cell volume was 2.728 liters and the system flow rate was at least 10 liters per minute the independent

sample time was less than 1.36 minutes.

Spiking was performed

on a 2-minute

integration

interval and therefore

the spike measurements

were obtained

with a minimum

two-minute separation. Path length determination.

Path length was determined

prior to testing using chlorodifluoromethane in nitrogen.

Using integrated

area ratios against a reference standard concentration

the path length was determined.

A copy of the calibration certificates may be found in the Appendices. A complete

system leak check was performed

prior to testing.

Results of the system leak check are provided

on the field data sheets. The heated sample line was conditioned

for over twelve hours in order to completely saturate the line and minimize

line loss.

Western Environmental

Services and Testing, Inc.

05-8018 10Acme Brick Company Denton, TX IV. SOURCE

EMISSIONS

CALCULATIONS The values in the sample calculations

shown below are from the Method

4 Run2 on the common stack. Computer

generated

numbers

were used to eliminate

rounding

error.
1. Volume of water collected,

standard

conditions

(wscf): Vw(std) K(V•O 0.04707(46.9) 2.21 wscf Vvmtd) Volurrw 023) of water collected.at

standard conditions Vtc Volume of liquid collected in impingers K 0.04707 Conversion

factor (ft•/ml)

2. Volume of gas metered,

standard

conditions

(dscf) (K)(V m)(P r + (460 + Tin) (17.647)(28.174)( 29.35 + •)(1.005) 27.44dscf (460+75) Vtn (std) Volume 023) of gas through the dry gas meter, at standard conditions Vm Volume (ft •) of gas sample through the dry gas meter, ambient conditions P•r Barometric

pressure (inches of rig) AH Average pressure drop across meter orifice (in.H20) Y Dry gas meter conversion

factor Tra Average dry gas meter temperature

(°F) K 1Z647 Conversion

factor (°R/inch Hg) 13.6 Conversion

factor (inch H20/inch Hg) 460 Conversion

constant (°F to °R)
3. Moisture

content, % Bw, Vw(,•)

x100% Vm(sut) + Vw(sta) 2.21 x100 % 27.44 + 2.21 7.45 % Bws Percent by volume of water vapor in the gas stream Vwo,a) Volume (ffl) of water collected, at standard conditions Vm(ad) Volume Off •) of gas through the dry gas meter, at standard conditions

Western Environmental

Services and Testing, Inc.

05-8018 11Acme Brick Company Denton, TX

40 Dry Gas, % Ga 100-Bws. 100-(7o45) 92.6% Molecular weight of dry gas stream (Ib/Ib mole) Ms= Mc• (%c°2---•) +Mo• (%°2----2) + (McoorlV•0

(•CO+•N2) (100) (100)

(100) 44.0 (2.2_._._•) + 32.0 (17.2..._._2) + 28.0.(80.6) (loo) (lOO)

(lOO) 29.04 lb/ib mole G d Percent of dry gas by volume in the gas stream Bws Percent by volume of water vapor in the gas stream

Md Dry molecular weight of sample gas (lb/lb•mole) Mco• Molecular

weight of carbon dioxide (lb/lbomole) Mo• Molecular

weight of oxygen (lb/lbomole) Mcoom2 Molecular

weight of CO or N• (lb/lbomole )(Same) C02 Percent by volume of C02 in the gas stream 02 Percent by volume of oxygen in the gas stream CO+N2 Percent by volume of CO and N2 in the gas stream 100 Conversion

from percent to decimal fraction
6. Molecular

weight of sample gas (lb/lb mole) Ms (Mo)(Gdl00)+(Mmo)(Bws/100) (29.04)(92.6/100)+(18)(7.45/100) =28.22 lb/lb mole
7, Sample gas pressure

(inches of Hg) (P•) P'= (13.6)(-0.58) (29.35)-t (13.6) =29.31 ino Hg
8o Velocity of sample gas (fffmin) (85.49)(0.840 )(60)(0.6783

),]" 403 + 460 28.22 x29.31 2,985 fpm Ms Molecular.weight

of sample gas, wet (lb/Ibomole) Md Dry molecular weight of sample gas (lb/lb.mole) Gd Percent of dry gas by volume in the gas stream Bws Percent by volume of water vapor in the gas stream M#s2o Molecular

weight of water (lb/lbomole)
Ps Absolute sample gas pressure (inches of rig) Pbar Barometric

pressure (inches of rig) Ps Sample gas static pressure (inches of H20) 13.6 Conversion

factor (inches HzO/inches

of rig)

Cp Pitot tube constant Kp Velocity pressure coefficient (dimensionless) 60 = Conversion factor (sec/min) Mr Molecular weight of sample gas, wet (Ib/lbomole) Ps Absolute sample gas pressure (inches of rig) Ts Average sample gas temperature

(°F) Vs Sample gas velocity (ft/min) • Average square roots of velocity heads of stack gas (in H•O) 460 Conversion constant (°F to °R)

Western Environmental

Services and Testing, Inc.

05-8018 129.

Total flow of sample gas, actual conditions (acfm)Qa (As)(Vs)(37.57)(2,985) 112,151 cfm Acme Brick Company Denton, TX Qa = Vo!urnetric

flow rate at actual conditions

(acfm) As = Cross sectional area of sampling location (ft z) Vs Sample gas velocity (ft/min)

10. Total flow of sample gas, standard

conditions (dscfm) G• Qstd (Qa)(Ps)(17"647)(1-•] (Ts

+ 460) (112,151)(29.31)(1%647)(92"6

• •, lOOJ (403 + 460) 62,205 dscf Qstd Volumetric

flow rate at standard conditions,

dry basis (dscfm) Q, Volumetric

flow rate at actual conditions

(acfm) P• Absolute sample gas pressure (inches of rig) Ga Percent of dry gas by volume in the gas stream Ts Average sample gas temperature

(°F) 17.647 Conversion

factor (°R/inch Hg) 460 Conversion

constant (°F to °R

11. Hydrogen

Chloride,

(lb/hr) lb/hr (Cgas)(M

Ho)(Qstd)(60

) (385.3)(10 "6) (1.0366)(3 6.46)(62,2

05)(60) (385.3X10 6) 0.3661 lb/hr Cga• Measured concentration

in the gas stream (gr/dscf) Mnct 36.46, Molecular

weight of Hydrogen Chloride Qstd Volumetric

flow rate at standard conditions,

dry basis (dscfm) 60 Conversion

factor (min/hr) (385.3)(10 "a) Conversion

factor (lb/

Westem Environmental

Services and Testing, Inc.

05-8018APPENDICES A. Field Data Sheets Bo Computer

Data Entry C. FT|R

Analytical

Data D. Calibration

of Equipment E. Resumes

of Test PersonnelAPPENDIX A Field Data Shee•sPort

& Inside D•e.:
•Port & inside Wall Thick:

2

12

Western

Env_ir.onmental

Services

end Testing,

Inc. .•,•liminary Velocity

Data

Source Identification

• (•/t• •, O •' Port A

Port B

Port C

Inside Stack Dia.:
Dist.fr•. Oist from ReL

Average: Port D

Averag•

PORT A

PORT B-

PORT C

pORT

nP Temp Cy•.

•P ITemp CycL

nP Temp I Oj¢¢

>=._PITemplOjcL I1I •o•" /-•

• •'oq•

• ¢o•1..•

I ¢ 0,¢ •.s"

, ¢o¢,• ,y• ,• ,¢• ,•, I I

I / i./

I I I I I I

I

III I I f

I I I /

I 1 i I

/ I I I I I I I

Pitot No.
Box #PbPs

•ea of Stack: AGFM_ % MoistureCO202coN2MdMWdMW

$CFM

SEE BACK FOR DRAWING

ANDFURTHER

INFORMATION 528 R, 29.92 "Hg, (20 C., 760 mm Hg) Velocity (fpm) Time of Testi Assumed SCFM Assumed VmstdDn SCFM(sample)/H K Factor Vmstd Isokinetic
0001A 0002Environmental Services

and Testing

Job Number: Reid Datai Source ID: Imp|nger #

Differenc• Run #:===•

Filter #: •

5

% Isokinetic

=

COMMENTS:

A 0003A 0004W rn Environmental

Services

and Testing,

Job Number: Field Data: Source ID: Run #: -•

Filter #: •

Final WE Inltlal WE. Difference Total, grams All=

COMMENTS:

A 000,5A 000•Environmental Sewioes

and Testing

ACF•

t••

% Isokinetic

=

COMMENTS:

A ooo•#

methodFile(s)

C:t.lV•cid•mme2,method # shiftFile

C:•l•Acid•20.6%h20.spa # backgmundFile Tlmestamp

Hydrogen Chloride HCI Error
Run 1 11/9/2005 8:08

1,0808

0.2171 11/9/2005 8:14

1.0882

0.2141 11/912085 8:19

•1186

0.2147 11/9/2005 8:24

1.1018

0.2157 1119/2005 8:29

1.1004

0,2187 11/912005 8:34

1.1041

0.2166 11/9/2005 8:39

1.0959

0.2164 11/9/2005 8:44

1.0942

0,2170 11/9/2005 8:49

1.0842

0.2188 11/912005 8:54

5.4023

0,2164 11/9/2005 8:59

8.0496

0.2257 111912005 9:04

3.0440

0.2122 Average 2.2637

0.217t Run 2 11/9/2005 9:44

1.0492

0.2976 11/9/2005 9:49

1.0336

0.2997 11/9/2005 9:54

1.0416

0.2142 11/9/2008 9:59

1.0493

0.2182 11/9/2005 10:04

1.0414

0.2161 11/9/2005 10:09

1,0407

0.2114 11/9/2005 10:14

1.0071

0.2110 11/9/2005 10:19

1.0139

0.2122 11/9/2005 10:24

1.0313

0,2155 11/9/2005 10:29

1.0364

0.2221 11/9/2005 10:34

1.0337

0.2249 11/9/2005 10:39

1.0535

0.2313 11/9/2005 10:44

1.0436

0.2133 Average 1.0366

0.2160 Run 3 11/9/2005 11:19

1.0651

0.2093 11/9/2005 11:24

1.0578

0.2110 11/9/2005 11:29

1.0592

0.2078 11/912085 11:34

1.0509

0.2067 11/9/2005 11:39

1.0488

0.2056 11/9/2005 11:44

1.0353

0.2084 11/9/2005 11:49

1.0354

0.2108 11/9/2005 11:64

1.0548

0.2136 1119/2005 11:59

1.0605

0.2144 11/9/2005 12:04

1.0348

0.2989 111912005 12:09

1.0411

0.2130 1119/2005 12:14

1.0369

0.2144 11/9/2005 12:19

t.0518

0.2133 Average 1.0486

0.2106 Run 4 11/9/2005 12:44

1.0342

0.2004 11/9/2005 12:49

1.0267

0,2024 11/9/2005 12:64

1.0309

0.2019 11/9/2005 12:59

1.0283

0.1990 I/9/2005 13:04

1.0406

0.2011 11/9/2005 13:09

1.0396

0,1970 11/9/2005 13:14

1.0135

0.1945 1119/2005 13:19

i.0170

0.1940 11/9/2005 13:24

0.9991

0.1917 11/9/2005 13:29

1.0077

0.1920 1119/2005 13:54

1.9027

0.1906 11/9/2005 13:39

0.9995

0.1877 1119/2005 13:44

1.0179

0.1904 Average 1.0198

0.1957

Hydrogen Fluoitde HFError

0.3875 0,3512 0.3217 0.3037 0.2967 0.2805 0.2493 0,2398 0.2176 21.5629 85,6186 36.0792 t2.1907

0.9740 0.8109 0.6960 0.6309 0.5721 0.5O87 0.4476 0.4004 0.3813 0.3516 0,3288 0,3295 0.2909 0.517t

0.1875 0.1778 0,1650 0.1523 0,1354 0.1332 0.1259 0.1213 0.1135 0.1090 0.1137 0.1073 0.1078

0.0840 0.0767 0,0728 0.0874 0.0764 0.0717 0.0624 0.0540 0.0633 0.0833 0.0567 0.0645 0.0587 0.0670 0.3942 0.3895 0,3909 0.3910 0.3924 0.3914 0.3896 0,3899 0,3872 1.0390 4.7798 2.0723

0.3829 0.3816 0.3875 0.3890 0.3840 0.3846 0.3816 0.3823 0.3835 0.3879 0.3878 0.3971 0.3897

0.3790 0.3833 0.3801 0.3787 0.3742 0.3755 0.3755 0.3757 0.3764 0.3739 0.3735 0.3755 0.3744 0.3765

0.3687 0,3877 0,3702 0.3877 0.3704 0.3683 0.3656 0,3885 0,3868 0.3666 0.3857 0,3616 0.3820 0.3669 0008Field Notes-F

0009APPENDIX B Computer Entry

Data000000000000

•00000000000•

elOoO•OOOOOOOOO

B O001o• °

•

o0• o

B 000200000000 O0 O0 00000000 O0 O0 0 O00000000 O0

•0• • • • • • • •00 O0000000

E • ddddddd

d dd dd

0000000000 O0

• •000000000000 • •0•00•• 000••••

0000000000000 0•0•0•0•0•0•0

0003

0APPENDIX C FTIR Analytical

DataPathlength CalibrationJob:

05-8018 Date: 11-08-05 Client: Acme Brick Plant: Denton, TX Source: Common

Stack

FT-IR

Cell Calibration FTIR:

32 meter Cal gas: R-22 Cylinder #: CC72495 Cylinder Concentration:

10 ppm

Freon 22 most accurate

Integration

Range 1200- 1050 era-1 Area Reference Reference Cone. (ppm) Reference Pressure (Tort) Reference Temperature

(C) Reference Pathlength

(meters)

8.055

Area Sample 12.611 10.9 Cal gas Cone. 10 760 Cal gas Pressure (Torr)

765.5 185 Cal gas Temp (K)

185 16.88 Cal gas Pathlength

(meters)

28.60 Ethylene (C2H4) Integration

Range 960 935 em-1 Area Reference Reference Conc. (ppm) Reference Pressure (Torr) Reference Temperature

(C) Reference Pathlen•h

(meters)

1.231

Area Sample 0.145 30.2 Cal gas Conc. 10.2 650 Cal gas Pressure (Ton")

691 100 Cai gas Temp (C)

185 20 Cal gas Pathlength

(meters)

8.0

Carbon Monoxide

(CO)

least accurate

Integration

Range 2250 2025 cm-1 Area Reference Reference Cone. (ppm) Reference Pressure (Torr) Reference Temperature

(C) Reference Pathlength

(meters)

8.162

Area Sample 0.474 100 Cal gas Cone. 13 650 Cal gas Pressure (Torr)

765 100 Cal gas Temp (C)

185.2 20 Cal gas Pathlength

(meters)

9.3

C 0001Analytical MethodImacc

Quant Method: Analytical

Hethod filename C:\l\Acid\acme2.method shift Information shift-reference

C:\l\Acid\20o6%h2oospa start 4150 stop 4300 maxdela• 4 interpolate-count

4 shift-count 4 Quant Information: digit-tolerance

3 data-size-tolerance 25 use-dynamic-references true use-bias true use-radiance false report-zero false References: set-filename CH4,CO2,H20, HCl 100,HF,NO2,SF6,SO2,$iF4, C:\1\Acid\ch4_340ao185 C:\I\Acid\co2-6%-68m.SPA C:\1\Acid\H20-90k-.94cm-1.SPA C:\FTIR\HCI\HC1

100ppm.spa C:\1\Acid\HF-250-1oSPA C:\l\Acid\NO2_lS.spa C:\FTIR\SF6\Sf6_76.185 C:\1\Acid\so2125.SPA C:\I\Acid\SIF4_2E3.185 code shortname

pres(Torr)

temp(C)

conc(ppm)

pathlength(m) CH4 ch4_340a

650

185

100

3.4 CO2 CO2-6%-68m 755

185

60000

68.5 H20 H20-90k-.94cm•l 700

185

90000 9 Hcl 100

HCl lO0ppm

760

185

100

32 HF HF-250-1

700

185

250

9 NO2 NO2_15

650

185

15

5.1 SF6 sf6_76

755

185

20

3.8 SO2 so2125

717

185

125

8 SiF4 SIF4_2E3

754

185

415

3,8 Regions
start

stop

report

interference 908.87 958.09 CO2,H20,SF6,SiF4 908.87 958.09 923.60 1098o70 CO2,H20,SF6,SiF4 924.48 969.61 i051•47 1096.60 992.87 1040.94 CO2,SiF4 992.87 1040.94 2425.56 2540°56

SO2 CO2,H20 2425.56 2540°56 2619.64 2868.82

Hcl 100 H20 2621.90 2868.82 2750.00 2953.24 CO2,H20,NO2 Page 1 C 00022826.84 2900.27 2907.50 2950.84 2827.65 3211.89 2864.25 2987.75 2999.19 3211.89 3172.70 3331.50 3172.70 3331.50 4037.44 4280.90 4108.49 4111.62 4140.90 4144.58 4172.97 4175.11 4202.03 4204.04 4228.15 4232.42 4255.05 4257.21 4278.85 4280.90

Analytical

Method CH4,CO2,H20,N02

Linearity: name CO2 order 2 force-zero true minimize-percent-error

false dynamic-reference true use-dyanamic false use-linearity .false use-shift false coefficents 0.521302,8.67966e-008,7o06709e-015 setname c02 References: set-filename

C:\IMACC\Method\co21ow.set CO2, C:\FTIR\CO2\CO2-1%-68m.SPA CO2, C:\FTIR\CO2\CO2-2%-68m.SPA CO2, C:\FTIR\CO2\CO2-4%-68m.SPA CO2, C:\FTIR\CO2\CO2-6%-68m.SPA CO2, C:\FTIR\CO2\CO2-8%-68m.SPA code shortname

pres(Torr)

temp(C)

conc(ppm)

pathl ength (m) CO2 CO2-1%-68m 755

185

10000 CO2 CO2-2%-68m 755

185

20000 CO2 CO2-4%-68m 7S5

185

40000 CO2 CO2-6%-68m 755

185

60000 CO2 CO2-8%-68m 755

185

80000

68.568. S68. S68. S68.5 Linearity: name SO2 order 2 force-zero true minimize-percent-error

true dynamic-reference true use-dyanamic false use-linearity false use-shift false coefficents 1.00693,4.17061e-006 setname so2 References: set-filename

C:\IMACC\Method\so2.set SO2,SO2,SO2,SO2,SO2,SO2, C:\I\Acid\so25.SPA C:\1\Acid\so220.SPA C:\1\Acid\so250.SPA C:\1\Acid\so212S.SPA C:\l\Acid\so2250.SPA C:\I\Acid\so2500.SPA Page 2 C 0003Analytical Method so2, C:\l\Acid\so2750.SPA SO2, C:\i\Acid\so2914b.SPA code shortname

pres(Torr)

temp(C)

conc(ppm)

pathlength(m) SO2 so25

717

185

5

8 SO2 so220

717

185

20

8 SO2 so250

717

185

50'

8 SO2 so2125

717

185

125

8 SO2 so2250

717

185

250

8 SO2 so2500

717

185

500

8 SO2 so2750

717

185

750

8 SO2 so2914b

717

185

914

8 Linearity:
name HCl 100 order 2 force-zero true minimize-percent-error

false dynamic-reference true use-dyanamic false use-linearity false use-shift false coefficents 0.367866,0.00019876 setname Hcl 100 References: set-filename HC1 100, C:\FTIR\HCI\HCI

Ippmospa HC1, 5ppm.spa HCI 100, 10ppmospa HCI, C:\FTIR\HCI\HC1

25ppm.spa HCI, 50ppm.spa HC1 100, C:\FTIR\HCI\HCI

100ppm.spa HCI, C:\FTIR\HCI\HC1

200ppm.spa HCI, 400ppm.spa code shortname

pres(Torr)

temp(C)

conc(ppm)

pathlength(m) HCl 100

HCl lppm

760

185

1

32 HCl HCl 5ppm

760

185

5

32 HCl 100

HCl lOppm

760

185

10

32 HCl Hcl 25ppm

760

185

25

32 HCl HCl 50ppm

760

185

50

32 Hcl 100

Hcl 100ppm

760

185

100

32 Hcl HCl 200ppm

760

185

200

32 HCl HCl 400ppm

760

185

400

32 Linearity: name CH4 order 3 force-zero true minimize-percent-error

true dynamic-reference true use-dyanamic false use-linearity false use-shift false coefficents 0.87228,0.000160747,8o75082e-009 setname CH4 References: set-filename CH4, C:\l\Acid\cH4-2p5ospa Page 3 C 0004Analytical CH4, C:\l\Acid\CH4-5.spa CH4, C:\l\Acid\ch4-10.spa CH4, C:\l\Acid\cH4-25ospa CH4, C:\l\Acid\CH4-50.spa CH4, C:\l\Acid\CH4-100ospa CH4, C:\l\Acid\CH4-20Oospa CH4, C:\I\Acid\CH4-500.spa CH4, C:\l\Acid\cH4-750oSpa CH4, C:\I\Acid\cH4-•000.spa code shortname

pres(Torr)

Method

temp(C)

conc(ppm)

pathlength(m) CH4 CH4-2p5

760

185

2°5 CH4 CH4-5

760

185

5 CH4 ch4-10

760

185

10 CH4 CH4-25

760

185

25 CH4 CH4-50

760

185

50 CH4 CH4-100

760

185

100 CH4 CH4-200

760

185

200 CH4 CH4-500

760

185

500 CH4 CH4-750

760

185

750 CH4 CH4-I000

760

185

1000 Linearity: name H20 order 3 force-zero true minimize-percent-error

false dynamic-reference true use-dyanamic false use-linearity false use-shift false coefficents = 0o811188,1.30025e-007 setname H20 References: set-filename

c:\IMACC\Method\lrh20.set H20, C:\l\Acid\H20-20k-0.94cm-loSPA H20, C:\l\Acid\H20-40k-0o94Cm-l.SPA H20, C:\•\Acid\H20-60k-°94cm-loSPA H20• C:\l\Ac•d\H20-110k-O.94cm-loSPA H20, C:\l\Acid\H20-125k-0.94cm-l.SPA H20, C:\FTIR\Water\20o6%h2oospa 10101010101010101010

code shortname

pres(Torr)

temp(C)

conc(ppm)

pathlength(m) H20 H20-20k-O.94cm-1 700

185 9 H20 H20-40k-0.94cm-1 700 H20 H20-60k-.94cm-1 700 H20 H20-110k-O.94cm-1 700 H20 H20-125k-0.94cm-1 700 H20 20.6%h2o

758 20000 185 4O0O0 185 60000 185 1ole+005 185 1o25e+005 185 2o06e+005 99 99 i0.3 Li neari ty: name HF order 2 force-zero true minimi ze-percent-error false dynamic-reference true use-dyanamic false use-linearity false use-shift false Page 4 C 0005Analytical Method coefficents 0.00205196,0.000331369 setname HF References: set-filename

C:\IMACC\HF

Low Res\hf2oset HFHFHFHFHFHFHFHFHFHFHF,HF, C:\I\Acid\HF-5-0o94Cm=IoSPA C:\I\Acid\HF-10-Oo94cm-IoSPA C:\1\Acid\HF-15-Oo94Cm-1oSPA C:\1\Acid\HF-20-O.94cm=l.SPA C:\1\Acid\HF-40-Oo94Cm-IoSPA C:\1\Acid\HF-100-Oo94cm-l.SPA C:\1\Acid\HF-120-O,94Cm-1.SPA C:\1\Acid\HF-300-0o94wav.spa C:\1\Acid\HF-350=Oo94Wav.spa C:\1\Acid\HF-400-O.94wav.spa C:\1\Acid\HF-450-Oo94wav,spa C:\1\Acid\HF-500-0o94wav.spa code shortname

pres(Torr)

temp(C)

conc(ppm)

pathl ength(m)
HF HF-5=0.94cm-1 HF HF-10-0.94cm-I HF HF-15-0.94cB-I HF HF-20-O.94cm-1 HF HF-40-O,94cm-1 HF HF-lOO-O.94cm-1 HF HF-120-0.94cm-1 HF HF-300-O.94wav HF HF-350-O.94wav HF HF-400-Oo94wav HF HF-450-O.94wav HF HF-SOO-O.94wav 700

185 700 185

10 700 185

15 700 185

20 700 185

40 700 185

i00 700 185

120 760 185

300 760 185

350 760 185

400 760 185

450 760 185

500

99999991010101010 Bi as:

Page 5 C 0006Example Spectraoo

1.0 0 •0 0 • 0 • 0 M'• 0 '•t • ¢0 • ¢•I ¢'q

0 0 d o d d c• d d d d e0ueqsosqv C 000oooc)

o
o

"-9O

._o

00

o o o c• c• o d d d d o, eoueqJosqv

> • • o • •3)

C 000•APPENDD• D Calibration of EquipmentWESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

AND TESTING

iNC. METER BOX CALIBRATION

FORM

Meter Box Num:

21

Average DGM Y

1,005

Tech:

N,HINES Pb 24,88

Delta H @

t ,668

Date:

10111/2005

od•ce LD.= 48

KI= 0,3510

DGM Final InitialTemp In/Out Avg. Tm °R/°F Delta H Time:Odflce Temp. Vacuum "Hg Vm (std•) ¢cr (std) DGMCF Y •)elta H @ 3rifice I,D.= 55

KI= 0,4625 1 2

1

2 896.064 898,321

901,278

904,236 893.803 896,064

898.321 901.278 2.261 641 63 163 524 64

2.257 641 63 64163 524 64 0,50 0.50 5 0,12 5,002 68

2.957 641 63 64163 524 64 0,88 5 0.06 5.001 68 5 0,01 5,000 68 16,0 16,0

15,0 1.899 1,896

2,487 1,901 1,901

2.504 1,003 1,007 1,640 1.001 1.640 Or•ce I,D,= 63

Kt= 0,5983 1 2 DGM Final

908,067

911.897 908.067 Initial 904.236 Vm 3.831 •'empln/Out 641 63 66163 •vg, Tm °R/°F

524

64

3,830
525 65 ]eltaH 1,50

1,50 Time:Odfice Temp. Vacuum "Hg Vm (std) Vcr (std)

5 0,19 5.003 68

5 0,11 5.002 6814,g3.2.,-!6 3,240 1,007 14,03.2253,2411,005 DGMCF Y Delta H@ 2.958 64 63 64 163 524 64 0,88 4 59,89 4,998 6815,02,488 2.5031,0061,666 Calibration Results* Orifice I,D,=

48 DGMCF Y= 1.002 Difference=

0.316% Avg, Vm (std)= 1,898 Difference (1)= -0.089%

(2)= 0.089%
Drifice I,D,=

55 DGMCF Y= 1.006 Difference=

-0,169% •vg. Vm (std)= 2.487 Difference (1)= 0,017%

(2)= -0.017%
Orifice I,D,=

63 DGMCF Y= 1,006 Avg. Vm (std)= 3,220 1.701 1,697 Difference=

-0,147%
Difference (1)= -0.132%

(2)= 0,132% *Results comply with Method 5 calibration

standards

where: DGMCF differences

are less than +/-2,0% and average Vm (std) differences

are less than +1-0,5%. 0001THERMOCOUPLE CALIBRATION

SHEET

Meter Box No

2!

Tech

NH .Reference: Mercury=in-Glass

ASTM 3F Reference Thermometer Thermocoul2•. Source: °F

°R

°F

°R Meter U. Date

10/11/2005

% Difference R

Ice Bath 460 460 0.00 Boiling Water 460 460 0.00 Hot Oil 460 460 0.00 Meter Out Ice Bath

33

493

33

493 Boiling Wa•r

210

670

210

670 Hot Oil

355

815

355

815 Probe: 0.000.000.00

Ice Bath

34

494

34

494 Boiling Water

211

671

210

670 Hot Oil

245

705

245

705 Stack 0.000.150.00

Ice Bath

32

492

33

493 Boiling Wa•r

211

671

210

670 Hot Oil

352

812

351

811 Oven -0.200.150.12

Ice Bath

33

493

33

493 Boiling Water

211

671

212

672 Hot Oil

359

819

358

818 Ex•: 0.00-0.150.12

Ice Bath

33

493

33

493 Boiling Water

212

672

213

673 Hot Oil

358

818

358

818 Auxilia•: 0.00-0.150.00

Ice Bath

33

493

32

492 Boilipg Water

210

670

211

671 Hot Oil

382

842

381

841 0.20-0.150.12

D 0002WESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL PITOT TUBE

CALIBRATION

Pitot Tube ID No. Performed by: Calibration Date

SAH 10112/2005

High side calibration

factor
Low side calibration

factor Comments:

0.840 0.842

•Pstd'(in.)H20 A-Side Calibration

(high side) APs'(in.) cp (s)

0.570 0.800 0.841 0.001 0.570 0.800 0.841 0.001 0.570 0.805 0.838
0.840 Average (Cp') -0.002

B-Side Calibration

(low side) APstd'(in.)H20 APs'(in .)H•O

Cp (•)• Dev. b

0.570 0.795 0.843 0.002 0.570 0.800 0.841 -0.001 0.570 0.800 0.841 -0.001 Average (Cp•

0.842 cp (s)" @( s• •aPs•] --•ssDev. b Cp (S) a Cp' (must be <_ 0.01) Cp' (A) Cp' (B)

-0.002

(must be <__0.01) Cp'(A) 0.840

Cp' (B) 0.842

Temperature

(°F)

67 Humidity (%)

50 Date: 612812005 Cp (std)*

0.996 Standard Pitot No.

3 *Cp (std) obtained

from Dwyer Instruments

air velocity calculator. Calibrations were done in accordance

with CFR Title 40, Part 60, Appendix

A, July 1, 1994. 13 0003FTIR Calibration

Gas CertificationsCertificate of Analysis 11711 South Alam•la • L0• •gCes, CA 90•59-2130 323.357.6891 Fa• 323•7.388• w•w, airgas.c•

Date of Analysis: Customer Name: Grade of Product:

10/19/2005
PRIMARY STANDARD Reference

Number: Part Number:.

48-124047993=1A X02NI99P15A48Y3

C linder Number SG9146708

Co=.•m_ponent
ETHYLENE NITROGEN Re_•.•q_uested
10.00 PPM Balance

Ac_t•oncentration 10.10 PPM Balance Notes:Re•lative Uncertai.nty

of Analytical

Value: +/- 1% of component

or +1- 0.02% of absolute, which ever is lower. Primary Standard_g•

mixtures

are t•at•to

N.I.S.T weights

and/or N.LS.T gas mixture referencemate•01•/• •(•

• ; Approval Signatur• ••

Page 1 0004APPENDIX E ]•esumes of Test PersonnelPROFESSIONAL PROFILE

Technical Expertise: JAKE

Wo CROWDER Project Supervisor

Source Emission

Testing Field Sampling Testing Methodologies

and Sample Analysis Calibration and Maintenance

of Sampling

Equipment FTIR
Technica| Experience:

Education:
Certification: Mr. Crowder

has over 4 years experience

in environmental

testing.

He has assisted in numerous

source emission

surveys

in the United States and central Africa.

Mr. Crowder

is fully knowledgeable

in the sampling, recovery, and data reduction

for Methods

1-5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 17, 26, 29, 201A, 202, and 316. Mr. Crowder

is also familiar

with the collection

and interpretation for gas chromatography.

He has also taken part in research studies for various

flare units to accurately

show low flows and high concentrations using various types of specialized

equipment.
Mr. Crowder

has some college

courses

in Business

Administration

and Economics thru Casper College

and Salt Lake Community

College. H2S Safety Training Visible Emissions

Training MSHA Safety Training

Course First Response

(First aid) FTIR Training OSHA 40-Hour

Safety Training

CoursePROFESSIONAL PROFILE

Technical Expertise:

Technical Experience: JAMES

E. MEADOR Founder, Former

President

and Project

Manager

® Source Emissions

Testing

® Project Management

® Field Sampling

Management

® QA/QC

® Environmental

Compliance

Audits

® Indoor Air Quality

® Analytical

Laboratory

Supervision

® Ambient

Air Monitoring
Mr. Meador

has twenty-seven

years experience

in environmental

consulting.

He has managed more than 4,500 source emissions

tests throughout

the United States and Intemationally, providing

emission

evaluations

for private

and governmental agencies. He has taught several classes to clients in various

locations

for observing and performing

Source Emissions

Testing.

Mr. Meador

has directed

the source sampling efforts for trial burns, ".including

those of high-public

profile incineration tests at US Depaxtment

of Defense

facilities

under the Chemical

Demilitarization Treaty. His expertise

ranges throughout

EPA as well as ASTM and NIOSH

test methods, with numerous

involvements

in developing

specialty

sampling

methods and procedures

for clients.

He has personally

managed

source test campaigns

for projects in Southeast

Asia and Africa. Based in Casper,

Wyoming,

Mr. Meador

has managed

more than thirty on-going ambient air networks,

including

ten radio-nuclide

studies for individual

uranium mining and milling facilities.

Management

of these projects

included

the significant interaction of analytical

and fieldwork

to demonstrate

environmental

compliance and baseline

data to the Wyoming

Department

of Environmental

Quality

(WDEQ), the U.S. Environmental

Protection

Agency

(EPA) and Nuclear

Regulatory Commission (NRC).

Several

of the projects

involved

surface and ground

water sampling, topsoil and overburden

sampling,

ambient

air gaseous

monitoring,

and meteorology as well as laboratory

analyses,

evaluation

and reporting.

Mr. Meador directed the laboratory

(mobile

and fixed) operations

under strict QA/QC

for anabandoned uranium

mining operation

in south-central

Wyoming.
Mr. Meador

initiated

and developed

WEST's

laboratory

capabilities

for directonsite soil and water analyses

in order to provide

rapid analytical

results on disturbed lands cleanup

projects,

and to enable engineering

decisions

to be made without cosily delay.
Mr. Meador

was responsible

for the management

of WEST's

mobile

laboratory operations and the analytical

results generated

by the laboratories

in an Abandoned Mines Land (AML) reclamation

project

near Baggs (uranium)

and Sundanee, Wyoming (bentonite).

Mr. Meador

has also served as liaison between

regulatory agencies and industry,

throughout

his career.
Mr. Meador

provided

management

and technical

expertise

in the permitting

and licensing (EPA, DEQ, and NRC) for Conoco,

Inc.'s future uranium

mill, mine, and separate in site mine near Pumpkin

Buttes, Wyoming.

This project consisted

of the sampling and analyses

(under EPA, DEQ and NRC regulations)

of the following: topsoil and overburden,

surface

water (standing

and event), ground water eased wells, air, radon-222,

particulate,

meteorology,

vegetation,

and wildlife.

Sampling
was provided

at regular

intervals

with analyses

including

native, inorganic,

and numerous radio-nuclide

parameters.
Mr. Meador

provided

professional

consultation

and marketing

in the opening

of an office in Dallas, Texas, which sends environmental

teams throughout

the Southwest. That office, now located

in San Mareos,

provides

both ambient

air and source emissions testing under the auspices

of the Texas Commission

on Environmental Quality.

Education:

Certification: Mr. Meador

has extensive

course work and research

in fungal organisms.

He spent
over two years as a research

assistant

in the Biology

Department

at Southwest

Texas State University

(now Texas State University)

culturing,

identifying,

and researching molds/fungi. His course work included

human pathology

in regard to fungi. Bachelor of Science;

Biology,

Chemistry;

Southwest

Texas State University, San Mareos,

Texas 1976 Short Course

Performing

and Observing

Source Sampling,

Dallas, Texas, 1977 OSHA 40-hour

Hazwoper

and Supervisor

Training Visible Emissions

Evaluator MSHA Mining Safety Training H2S Safety Certified Licensed Private Pilot (single engine-land) Mold Remediation,

Hazards,

Standards,

and Sampling

CertificationProfessional Memberships: Member

Source Evaluation

Society since 1990 Board of Directors

2003-present Past Air & Waste Management

Association

Committee

Member Source Emissions

Testing ASTM D22 Committee

Member Society of Mining Engineers

of A.I.M.E. American Indoor Air Quality Council National Association

of Environmental

Professionals Member of Rotary International,

Five Trails Rotary Club, Casper,

Wyoming,

past board of Directors