alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 512.20 Publication of results of research project. ( a ) A researcher may publish in book form and professional journals the results of any research project conducted under this subpart. ( 1 ) In any publication of results, the researcher shall acknowledge the Bureau's participation in the research project.
( 2 ) The researcher shall expressly disclaim approval or endorsement of the published material as an expression of the policies or views of the Bureau.
( b ) Prior to submitting for publication the results of a research project conducted under this subpart, the researcher shall provide two copies of the material, for informational purposes only, to the Chief, Office of Research and Evaluation, Central Office, Bureau of Prisons.
[59 FR 13860, Mar. 23, 1994, as amended at 62 FR 6662, Feb. 12, 1997]
#### Buchanan *v.*James, commissioner, *et al.*

Fish, C. J.

1. A motion for a new trial is a means of seeking to have a retrial or re-examination, in the same court, of an issue of fact, or of some part or portion thereof, after decision hy a jury, report of "a referee, or a decision hy the court thereon. It is an application for a retrial of' the facts of the case. 2 Thomp. Trials, § 2708; *Castellano*v. *Blanchard,*106 *Ga.*97 (31 S. E. 801); 5 Words & Phrases, 4788 et seq.

2. The grant of a nonsuit terminates the case without á final passing upon the issues of fact hy a jury, referee, or judge. It is a ruling hy the judge, that the plaintiff, under the evidence presented by him, has not. *476made out such a ease as to entitle liim to have the jury pass upon the issrtes of fact. It is a ruling of law by the judge, not a determination of the issues of fact. Under the practice in this State, it does not preclude the plaintiff from bringing another action, and seeking to ’ make out his case by the introduction of evidence on the trial thereof.

May 11, 1910.

Motion. Before Judge Worrill. Early superior court.

July *23,*1909.

*Pottle & Glessner*and *Park & Collins,*for plaintiff.

*R. H. Sheffield*and *Pope &*Bennet, for defendants.

3. It follows from the distinction which will appear from the two preceding headnotes that where the presiding judge grants a nonsuit, and thus terminates the case before a verdict or decision upon the issues of fact, a motion for a new trial is not the proper mode of.testing the correctness of such ruling. *See Hudson*v. *Georgia Pacific Ry. Co.,*85 *Ga.*203 (11 S. E. 605); *Central Railroad Co.*v. *Folds,*86 *Ga.*42 (12 S. E. 216)*; Swain*v. *Macon Fire Ins. Co.,*102 *Ga.*96, 103 (29 S. E. 147);*Southern Railway Co.*v. *James,*114 *Ga.*198 (39 S. E. 849); *City of Atlanta*v. *Miller,*125 *Ga.*495 (54 S. E. 538).

3. There was no error in dismissing the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### Nathan Forman, Respondent, v. Harry Horowitz, as President of the Bakery *&*Confectionery Workers’ International Union of America, Local 51, et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present ■—Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
§ 513.61 Freedom of Information Act requests by inmates. ( a ) Inmates are encouraged to use the simple access procedures described in § 513.40 to review disclosable records maintained in his or her Inmate Central File.
( b ) An inmate may make a request for access to documents in his or her Inmate Central File or Medical File (including documents which have been withheld from disclosure during the inmate's review of his or her Inmate Central File pursuant to § 513.40) and/or other documents concerning the inmate which are not contained in the Inmate Central File or Medical File. Staff shall process such a request pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552.
( c ) The inmate requester shall clearly mark on the face of the letter and on the envelope “FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST”, and shall clearly describe the records sought, including the approximate dates covered by the record. An inmate making such a request must provide his or her full name, current address, date and place of birth. In addition, if the inmate requests documents to be sent to a third party, the inmate must provide with the request an example of his or her signature, which must be verified and dated within three (3) months of the date of the request.
# C_2012243EN.01001703.xml

| 11.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 June 2012 — Interkobo v OHIM — XXXLutz Marken (my baby)

(Case T-523/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark my baby - Earlier national and international word marks MYBABY and earlier national figurative mark mybaby - Relative ground for refusal - Failure to produce evidence in the language of the opposition proceedings - Legitimate expectation - Rules 19(3), 20(1) and 98(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)

2012/C 243/33

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Interkobo sp. z o.o. (Łódź (Poland)) (represented by: R. Skubisz and K. Ziemski, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: XXXLutz Marken GmbH (Wels (Austria)) (represented by: H. Pannen, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 September 2010 (Case R 88/2009-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Interkobo sp. Z o.o. and XXXLutz Marken GmbH

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Interkobo sp. z o.o. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Interkobo sp. z o.o. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 13, 15.1.2011.

1

---
§ 51.35 Disposition of inappropriate submissions and resubmissions. ( a ) When the Attorney General determines that a response on the merits of a submitted change is inappropriate, the Attorney General shall notify the submitting official in writing within the 60-day period that would have commenced for a determination on the merits and shall include an explanation of the reason why a response is not appropriate.
( b ) Matters that are not appropriate for a merits response include: ( 1 ) Changes that do not affect voting (*see* § 51.13);
( 2 ) Standards, practices, or procedures that have not been changed (*see* §§ 51.4, 51.14);
( 3 ) Changes that previously have received preclearance;
( 4 ) Changes that affect voting but are not subject to the requirement of section 5 (*see* § 51.18);
( 5 ) Changes that have been superseded or for which a determination is premature (*see* §§ 51.22, 51.61(b));
( 6 ) Submissions by jurisdictions not subject to the preclearance requirement (*see* §§ 51.4, 51.5);
( 7 ) Submissions by an inappropriate or unauthorized party or jurisdiction (*see* § 51.23); and
( 8 ) Deficient submissions (*see* § 51.26(d)).
( c ) Following such a notification by the Attorney General, a change shall be deemed resubmitted for section 5 review upon the Attorney General's receipt of a submission or other written information that renders the change appropriate for review on the merits (such as a notification from the submitting authority that a change previously determined to be premature has been formally adopted). Notice of the resubmission of a change affecting voting will be given to interested parties registered under § 51.32.
[Order No. 3262-2011, 76 FR 21246, Apr. 15, 2011]
Exhibit No. 32.1
----------------
Form 10-QSB
Senior Optician Service, Inc.
File No. 0-28717


          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Senior Optician  Service,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Donald Hill,  Chief  Executive  and  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that:  (1) the  Report  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: February 7, 2005                  By:     /s/Donald Hill
      ----------------                     -------------------------------------
                                                                     Donald Hill
                                           Chief Executive and Financial Officer


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Senior  Optician  Service,  Inc.  and will be  retained  by Senior
Optician Service,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 9 (Thursday, January 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2431-2432]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-651]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Houston District Office Advisory Committee

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice of open Federal advisory committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The SBA is issuing this notice to announce the location, date, 
time, and agenda for the next meeting of the Houston District Office 
Advisory committee. The meeting will be open to the public.

[[Page 2432]]


DATES: The meeting will be held on February 16, 2011 from approximately 
11:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. Central Standard Time.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the U.S. Small Business 
Administration Conference Room, located at 8701 South Gessner, Suite 
1200, Houston, TX. 77074.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), SBA announces the 
meeting of the Houston District Office Advisory Committee. The Houston 
District Office Advisory Committee is tasked with providing advice and 
recommendations to the District Director, Regional Administrator, and 
the SBA Administrator.
    The purpose of the meeting is to interact and get feedback from the 
community stakeholders on how we can better serve our community and to 
create new networking opportunities with the Houston community. The 
agenda or topics to be discussed will include: Lender Performance, 
Small Business Job Act update Guest Speaker: Jacqueline Taylor, 
Associate Region Director of U of H SBDC, Lender SBA Goals for FY 2010-
2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The meeting is open to the public, 
however, advance notice of attendance is requested. Anyone wishing to 
attend and/or make a presentation to the Houston District Office 
Advisory Committee must contact Sonia Maldonado, Business Development 
Specialist by February 9, 2011, by fax or e-mail in order to be placed 
on the agenda. Sonia Maldonado, Business Development Specialist, 8701 
S. Gessner Drive, Suite 1200, Houston, TX 77074, Fax 202-481-5617, or 
e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6f3c0001060e41020e030b00010e0b002f1c0d0e41080019"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4b182425222a65262a272f24252a2f240b38292a652c243d">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Additionally, if you need accommodations because of a disability or 
require additional information, please contact Sonia Maldonado.
    For more information, please visit our Web site at http://www.sba.gov/tx.

    Dated: January 4, 2011.
Dan Jones,
SBA Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-651 Filed 1-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 45.1 Cross-reference to ethical standards and financial disclosure regulations.

Employees of the Department of Justice are subject to the executive branch-wide Standards of Ethical Conduct at 5 CFR part 2635, the Department of Justice regulations at 5 CFR part 3801 which supplement the executive branch-wide standards, the executive branch-wide financial disclosure regulations at 5 CFR part 2634 and the executive branch-wide employee responsibilities and conduct regulations at 5 CFR part 735.

[61 FR 59815, Nov. 25, 1996]
#### § 4.6 Institution of proceedings.

All applications and supporting documents received by the Commission shall be reviewed for completeness by the Office of General Counsel of the Parole Commission and if complete and fully in compliance with the regulations of this part the Office of General Counsel shall accept them for filing. Applicant and/or his representative will be notified by the Office of General Counsel of any deficiency in the application and supporting documents. The amount of time allowed for deficiencies to be remedied will be specified in said notice. In the event such deficiencies are not remedied within the specified period or any extension thereof, granted after application to the Commission in writing within the specified period, the application shall be deemed to have been withdrawn and notice thereof shall be given to applicant.
#### § 34.103 Definition.

*Peer review* means the technical and programmatic evaluation by a group of experts (other than officers and employees of the Department of Justice) qualified by training and experience to give expert advice, based on selection criteria established under subpart A of this part, in a program announcement, or as established by the Administrator, on the technical and programmatic merit of assistance.
Exhibit 24


                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

     We, the undersigned, hereby constitute Charles W. Cramb and Richard K.
Willard, or either of them, our true and lawful attorneys with full power to
sign for us in our name and in the capacity indicated below, the Annual Report
on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
filed for the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year
ended December 31, 2003, and any and all amendments and supplements thereto,
hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures as they may be signed by our said
attorneys, or either of them, to said Report and to any and all amendments and
supplements to said Report.

     WITNESS Our Hand and Seal on the Date set forth below.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE                      TITLE                          DATE
---------                      -----                          ----
<S>                            <C>                            <C>
/s/ James M. Kilts             Chairman of the Board of       February 17, 2004
--------------------------     Directors, Chief Executive
James M. Kilts                 Officer, President and
                               Director

/s/ Edward F. DeGraan          Vice Chairman of the Board     February 17, 2004
--------------------------     of Directors and Director
Edward F. DeGraan

/s/ Charles W. Cramb           Senior Vice President and      February 17, 2004
--------------------------     Chief Financial Officer
Charles W. Cramb

/s/ Claudio E. Ruben           Vice President, Controller     February 17, 2004
--------------------------     and Principal Accounting
Claudio E. Ruben               Officer

/s/ Roger K. Deromedi
--------------------------     Director                       February 17, 2004
Roger K. Deromedi

/s/ Wilbur H. Gantz
--------------------------     Director                       February 17, 2004
Wilbur H. Gantz

/s/ Michael B. Gifford
--------------------------     Director                       February 17, 2004
Michael B. Gifford

/s/ Ray J. Groves
--------------------------     Director                       February 17, 2004
Ray J. Groves

/s/ Dennis F. Hightower
--------------------------     Director                       February 17, 2004
Dennis F. Hightower

/s/ Herbert H. Jacobi
--------------------------     Director                       February 17, 2004
Herbert H. Jacobi

/s/ Nancy J. Karch
--------------------------     Director                       February 17, 2004
Nancy J. Karch

/s/ Fred H. Langhammer
--------------------------     Director                       February 17, 2004
Fred H. Langhammer

/s/ Jorge Paulo Lemann
--------------------------     Director                       February 17, 2004
Jorge Paulo Lemann

/s/ Marjorie M. Yang
--------------------------     Director                       February 17, 2004
Marjorie M. Yang
</TABLE>
Stay healthy around animals!

Animals can carry germs that make people sick.

Never eat, drink, or put anything in your mouth around animals.

Older adults, pregnant women, and young children should be extra careful around animals.

Wash your hands with soap and water right after visiting animals.

www.cdc.gov/handwashing
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 37 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 37

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed export to the 
United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern 
  Ireland, and the Republic of France of certain defense articles and 
                               services.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the issuance of an export 
license with respect to any of the following proposed exports to the 
United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern 
Ireland, or France is prohibited:
            (1) The transfer of the following defense articles, 
        including defense services and technical data, described in 
        Executive Communication 1425 (EC-1425) submitted to Congress 
        pursuant to section 36(c) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 
        U.S.C. 2776(c)) and published in the Congressional Record on 
        June 3, 2019: The proposed transfer of 44,000 GBU-12 Paveway II 
        Kits and the proposed transfer of 16,000 GBU-10 Paveway II 
        Kits.

            Passed the Senate June 20, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. J. RES. 37

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed export to the 
United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern 
  Ireland, and the Republic of France of certain defense articles and 
                               services.
```
-  Home 
-  About Us 

# In This Section

                      -  The GLS Today                          -  What does the GLS do? 
                        -  The St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation 
                        -  The Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway System 
                        -  Meet the Administrator 
                        -  Meet Our Team 
                        -  Careers at the GLS 
                        -  Contact the GLS 
                      -  Historic Photos and Other Artifacts 

## Contact the GLS

Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation (GLS)Policy HeadquartersU.S. Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Ave, SE W62-300Washington, DC20590United States

**Email:**GLS@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-0091****Alt Phone:**800-785-2779****Fax:**202-366-7147****Business Hours:**8:00am-5:00 pm ET, M-F

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

                            - GLS on Facebook
                            - GLS on Twitter
                            - GLS on Instagram
                            - Great Lakes - St. Lawrence Seaway

# Privacy Policy

This information is designed to help you understand the DOT’s personal information handling practices. Here you will find the details of:
                      - How information is collected by the DOT
                      - How you can access information DOT has about you
                      - What your rights are under the Privacy Act of 1974

If you have any questions regarding the Privacy Program, please email the Department of Transportation’s Privacy Officer.

## DOT Privacy Links

                      - DOT's Web Site Privacy Policy
                      - How to Get a Copy of Your Record
                      - Your Rights Under the Privacy Act of 1974
                      - Your Rights Under the E-Government Act of 2002
                      - DOT Privacy Impact Assessments
                      - DOT Privacy Act System of Records
                      - DOT Privacy Program Contacts

## General Privacy Links

                      - Privacy Act of 1974
                      - E-Government Act of 2002 Implementation Instructions
                      - White House Privacy Guidance for Federal Agencies
                      - Federal Trade Commission Privacy Page
                      - Government Wide Privacy Act Notices

## Additional Privacy-Related Links

                      - Freedom of Information Act - Department of Transportation
                      - How Are the Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act similar?
                      - The Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA)