alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit No. 32

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) UNDER
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AND 18 U.S.C. 1350

Each of the undersigned, the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Gerber Scientific, Inc., hereby certifies that, on the date hereof:

(i)	The Annual Report on Form 10-K of Gerber Scientific, Inc. for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2005 filed the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)	Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gerber Scientific, Inc.



|Date:  July 14, 2005 | /s/ Marc T. Giles                                   | 
|-------------------- | --------------------------------------------------- | 
|                     | Marc T. Giles
President and Chief Executive Officer | 



| | /s/ Jay Zager                                               | 
| | ----------------------------------------------------------- | 
| | Jay Zager
Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer |
ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                         TO
                   AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                         OF
                                MESABA HOLDINGS, INC.


               Mesaba Holdings, Inc., a corporation organized and existing
          under the laws of the State of Minnesota (herein referred to as
          the "corporation"), in accordance with the provisions of
          Minnesota Statutes, Section 302A.139, hereby certifies as
          follows: 

               1.   The name of the corporation is Mesaba Holdings, Inc.

               2.   Section 3.01 of Article III of the Amended and Restated
          Articles of Incorporation of the corporation is hereby amended in
          its entirety to read as follows:


                         3.01  The aggregate number of shares of
                    Common Stock which this corporation shall
                    have the authority to issue is sixty million
                    (60,000,000) shares of Common Stock each with
                    $.01 par value.  Such  shares shall be
                    designated as this corporation's "Common
                    Stock."


               3.   The amendment of the Amended and Restated Articles of
          Incorporation of the corporation has been duly adopted by the
          Board of Directors and the shareholders pursuant to the Minnesota
          Business Corporation Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 302A.

               IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  these Articles of Amendment of Mesaba
          Holdings, Inc. are hereby executed on behalf of the corporation
          this 31st day of August 1998.


                                             MESABA HOLDINGS, INC.



                                             By /s/ Bryan K. Bedford       
                                                _________________________ 
                                                  
                                                  Bryan K. Bedford
                                                  President and Chief   
                                                  Executive Officer
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

CAROLINE M. BELILES,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-10355

D.C. No. 1:10-cr-00038-JVEM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Guam

Frances Tydingco-Gatewood, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 21, 2012** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Caroline Beliles appeals her jury-trial conviction for theft of government

property, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641, for which she was sentenced to three

years of probation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

FEB 24 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-10355

Beliles’s sole contention on appeal is that her trial attorney rendered

ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to request a limiting instruction

regarding evidence of uncharged acts that was presented at trial. Although

ineffective assistance of counsel claims are generally not considered on direct

appeal, the record in this case is sufficiently developed to permit consideration of

this claim. See United States v. Alferahin, 433 F.3d 1148, 1160 n.6 (9th Cir. 2006). 

Beliles’s claim fails for lack of prejudice because there is no reasonable

probability that the reading of a limiting instruction would have affected the jury’s

verdict given the strength of the government’s evidence against Beliles. See

Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694-96 (1984).

AFFIRMED.
### **CHAPTER 26—ESTUARINE AREAS**

Sec.
1221.
Congressional declaration of policy.
1222.
General study and inventory of estuaries and their natural resources.
1223.
Agreements with States and subdivisions; equitable sharing of costs; development improvements; availability of appropriations; State hunting and fishing laws applicable.
1224.
Commercial and industrial development considerations; reports to Congress; recommendations.
1225.
State consideration of protection and restoration of estuaries in State comprehensive planning and proposals for financial assistance under certain Federal laws; grants: terms and conditions, prohibition against disposition of lands without approval of the Secretary.
1226.
Federal agency authority to carry out Federal project within an estuary unaffected.
#### § 301.302 Work-related death.

A claim for compensation as the result of work-related death may be filed by a dependent of the deceased inmate up to one year after the inmate's work-related death. The claim shall be submitted directly to the Claims Examiner, Federal Bureau of Prisons, 320 First Street NW., Washington, DC 20534.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-81,867-01

EX P ARTE CORY DALE MORGAN, Applicant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 12-1212-K 368A IN THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT F ROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R P u rs uant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, t h e cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession with intent to distribute four g rams or more but less than 200 g rams of methamphetamine and was sentenc ed to twenty

year s’ incar cer ation. There was no dire ct appe al. Applicant contends, inter alia , that he ag ree d to plead guilty to the drug o ff en s e wi t h an aff irmative dea dly

wea pon findinginstead of plea ding guilty to it with a f

inding it was c ommitt ed in a drug -fr ee zone. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 42.12 § 3g (a) (2); C O N T R O L L E D S U B S T A N C E S A C T § 481.134(c) . He state s that his decision was base d on trial counsel’s advice that he would be2

el i gi ble for parole considera tion ear lier with a deadly -we apon finding than with a drug -fr ee- zo n e finding

. See T E X . G O V ’ T C O D E §§ 508.145(d)( 1), (e). He argues t hat t he adv ice was incorre ct and that his plea was there fore involuntary

. See Strickland v. W ashington , 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984); Ex Parte Moussazadeh, 361 S.W .3d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012)

. Counsel has supplied an aff idavit, which details the advice he g ave Applicant. I t re m ains

u n cl ea r to this Court, howeve r, whether counsel’s advice to Applicant reg arding when Applicant would become parole elig ible under eac h plea- deal scena rio was corr ect. We order that this application be filed and set for sub m i s s i o n to deter mine whether Applicant’s guilty plea was involuntary

due to re ceivingincorre ct par ole elig ibilit y advice . The pa

rties shall brief

the issues. The trial court shall determine whe ther Applica nt is indige nt. I f Appli cant is indige nt and desires to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to repr esent Applicant. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art 26.04. The trial court shall send to this Court, within 60 day s of the date of this order , a supplemental transcr ipt containing either the order appointing counsel or a statement that Applicant is not indigent. All brie fs shall be filed w ith this Court within 120 day s of t he date of this order.

Filed: January

27, 2016 Do not publish
**Exhibit      10.2**

----

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER****PURSUANT  TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Jean-Jacques      Gauthier, Chief Financial Officer of Lafarge, a *société anonyme* organized      under French law, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual      Report of Lafarge on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003,      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,      to my knowledge, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained      in such Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects,      the financial condition and results of operations of Lafarge as of the      dates and for the periods set forth therein.: 

Date: March    26, 2004 

|   | /s/        JEAN-JACQUES GAUTHIER   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|   |                                         |
|   | Jean-Jacques        Gauthier            |
|   | Executive        Vice President and CFO |

A signed original    of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act    of 2002 has been provided to Lafarge and will be retained by Lafarge and    furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Document Search 
-  State Trade Expansion Program (STEP) Annual Report 

# State Trade Expansion Program (STEP) Annual Report

## About this document and download

The STEP annual reports include:
                  - The number and amount of grants made under the program during the preceding year
                  - A list of the States receiving a grant under the program during the preceding year, including the activities being performed with each grant
                  - The effect of each grant on the eligible small business concerns in the State receiving the grant
                  - The total return on investment for each State
                  - A description of best practices by States that showed high returns on investment and significant progress in helping more eligible small business concerns   	 

*The STEP Annual reports are reported yearly but the fiscal year of the STEP program has to end so that reports can be aggregated and will be reflected once they are closed out. This means fiscal years are delayed in the Annual reports.*

  Download  .pdf

**Effective**

##                 Variations of this document            

-         Version      Step Year 7 (FY'18) |               Effective:      January 1, 2020 |        File size: 447KB |          Download      .pdf        for Step Year 7 (FY'18) / January 1, 2020       
-         Version      Step Year 6 (FY'17) |               Effective:      January 1, 2019 |        File size: 309KB |          Download      .pdf        for Step Year 6 (FY'17) / January 1, 2019       
-         Version      Step Year 5 (FY'16) |               Effective:      January 1, 2018 |        File size: 392KB |          Download      .pdf        for Step Year 5 (FY'16) / January 1, 2018       
-         Version      Step Year 4 (FY'15) |               Effective:      January 1, 2017 |        File size: 264KB |          Download      .pdf        for Step Year 4 (FY'15) / January 1, 2017
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                       3,999,670
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               25,060,812
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,974,732
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      12,498,263
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,796,819
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              43,023,036
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                     23,709,061
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 27,000,000
<COMMON>                                        34,762
<OTHER-SE>                                (21,815,838)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                43,023,036
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,303,528
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               26,435,137
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0<F2>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                868,391
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            868,391
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   868,391
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
<FN>
<F1>THE BALANCE SHEET IS UNCLASSIFIED
<F2>INTEREST EXPENSE IS CONSIDERED AN OPERATING EXPENSE OF THE REGISTRANT
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### § 1.11 Advisory nature of regulations.

The regulations contained in this part are advisory only and for the internal guidance of Department of Justice personnel. They create no enforceable rights in persons applying for executive clemency, nor do they restrict the authority granted to the President under Article II, section 2 of the Constitution.

[Order No. 1798-93, 58 FR 53658, Oct. 18, 1993. Redesignated by Order No. 2317-2000, 65 FR 48381, Aug. 8, 2000]
§ 15.15 Discovery. ( a ) At any time after the initiation of the proceeding, the administrative law judge may order, by subpoena if necessary, the taking of a deposition and the production of relevant documents by the deponent. Such order may be entered upon a showing that the deposition is necessary for discovery purposes and that such discovery could not be accomplished by voluntary methods. Such an order may also be entered in extraordinary circumstances to preserve relevant evidence upon a showing that there is substantial reason to believe that such evidence could not be presented through a witness at the hearing. The decisive factors for a determination under this subsection, however, shall be fairness to all parties and the requirements of due process. A deposition may be taken orally or upon written questions before any person who has the power to administer oaths and shall not exceed one day of seven hours.
( b ) Each deponent shall be duly sworn, and any adverse party shall have the right to cross-examine. Objections to questions or documents shall be in short form, stating the grounds upon which objections are made. The questions propounded and the answers thereto, together with all objections made (but not including argument or debate), shall be reduced to writing and certified by the person before whom the deposition was taken. Thereafter, the person taking the deposition shall forward the deposition and one copy thereof to the party at whose instance the deposition was taken and shall forward one copy to the representative of the other party.
( c ) A deposition may be admitted into evidence as against any party who was present or represented at the taking of the deposition, or who had due notice thereof, if the administrative law judge finds that there are sufficient reasons for admission and that the admission of the evidence would be fair to all parties and comport with the requirements of due process.
### §21. Establishment; boundaries; trespassers

The tract of land in the States of Montana and Wyoming, lying near the headwaters of the Yellowstone River and described as follows, to wit, commencing at the junction of Gardiner's River, with the Yellowstone River, and running east to the meridian passing ten miles to the eastward of the most eastern point of Yellowstone Lake; thence south along said meridian to the parallel of latitude passing ten miles south of the most southern point of Yellowstone Lake; thence west along said parallel to the meridian passing fifteen miles west of the most western point of Madison Lake; thence north along said meridian to the latitude of the junction of the Yellowstone and Gardiner's Rivers; thence east to the place of beginning, is reserved and withdrawn from settlement, occupancy, or sale under the laws of the United States, and dedicated and set apart as a public park or pleasuring ground for the benefit and enjoyment of the people; and all persons who locate, or settle upon, or occupy any part of the land thus set apart as a public park, except as provided in section 22 of this title, shall be considered trespassers and removed therefrom.

(R.S. §2474.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §2474 derived from act Mar. 1, 1872, ch. 24, §1, 17 Stat. 32.
### §690d. Debentures

#### (a) In general

The Administrator may guarantee the timely payment of principal and interest, as scheduled, on debentures issued by any Renewable Fuel Capital Investment company.

#### (b) Terms and conditions

The Administrator may make guarantees under this section on such terms and conditions as it determines appropriate, except that—

(1) the term of any debenture guaranteed under this section shall not exceed 15 years; and

(2) a debenture guaranteed under this section—

(A) shall carry no front-end or annual fees;

(B) shall be issued at a discount;

(C) shall require no interest payments during the 5-year period beginning on the date the debenture is issued;

(D) shall be prepayable without penalty after the end of the 1-year period beginning on the date the debenture is issued; and

(E) shall require semiannual interest payments after the period described in subparagraph (C).

#### (c) Full faith and credit of the United States

The full faith and credit of the United States is pledged to pay all amounts that may be required to be paid under any guarantee under this part.

#### (d) Maximum guarantee

#### (1) In general

Under this section, the Administrator may guarantee the debentures issued by a Renewable Fuel Capital Investment company only to the extent that the total face amount of outstanding guaranteed debentures of such company does not exceed 150 percent of the private capital of the company, as determined by the Administrator.

#### (2) Treatment of certain Federal funds

For the purposes of paragraph (1), private capital shall include capital that is considered to be Federal funds, if such capital is contributed by an investor other than a department or agency of the Federal Government.

(Pub. L. 85–699, title III, §385, as added Pub. L. 110–140, title XII, §1207, Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1778.)
### SUBCHAPTER V—YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK
§ 2.93 Travel approval. ( a ) A parolee's Supervision Officer may approve travel outside the district of supervision without approval of the Commission in the following situations: ( 1 ) Vacation trips not to exceed thirty days.
( 2 ) Trips, not to exceed thirty days, to investigate reasonably certain employment possibilities.
( 3 ) Recurring travel across a district boundary, not to exceed fifty miles outside the district, for purpose of employment, shopping, or recreation.
( b ) Specific advance approval by the Commission is required for all foreign travel, employment requiring recurring travel more than fifty miles outside the district, and vacation travel outside the district of supervision exceeding thirty days. A request for such permission shall be in writing and must demonstrate a substantial need for such travel.
( c ) A special condition imposed by the Commission prohibiting certain travel shall apply instead of any general rules relating to travel as set forth in paragraph (a) of this section.
( d ) The district of supervision for a parolee under the supervision of the D.C. Community Supervision Office of CSOSA shall be the District of Columbia, except that for the purpose of travel permission under this section the district of supervision will include the D.C. metropolitan area as defined in the certificate of parole.
## Breadcrumb

-  Inicio 
-  Guía de Negocios 
-  Lance Su Empresa 
-  Solicite Licencias y Permisos 

## Section navigation

-  10 pasos para iniciar su empresa 
-  Planifique su empresa 
-  Lance su empresa    -  Elija la ubicación de su empresa 
  -  Elija una estructura comercial 
  -  Elija un nombre para su empresa 
  -  Registre su empresa 
  -  Obtenga su número de identificación del contribuyente federal y estatal 
  -  Solicite licencias y permisos 
  -  Abra una cuenta bancaria comercial 
  -  Obtenga un seguro comercial 
-  Administre su empresa 
-  Haga crecer su empresa 

# Solicite licencias y permisos

----

## Contenido

----

## Licencias y permisos federales

Por lo general, las pequeñas empresas necesitan una combinación de licencias y permisos de agencias federales y estatales. Las actividades empresariales reguladas por una agencia federal deberán obtener una licencia o permiso federal.

Revise si alguna de sus actividades empresariales aparece en la siguiente lista. Luego, consulte cómo presentar la solicitud a la agencia federal correcta.

Los requisitos y cargos varían con su actividad empresarial y la agencia emisora. Consulte los detalles sobre el costo de la licencia comercia con la agencia correspondiente.

## Licencias y permisos estatales

Las licencias y permisos que necesita de su estado, condado o municipio dependerán de sus actividades empresariales y de la ubicación de la empresa. También variará el costo de su licencia comercial. Puede ser que también requiera licencias de su condado o ciudad.

Los estados tienden a regular una variedad más amplia de actividades que el gobierno federal. Las actividades comerciales que normalmente se regulan a nivel local incluyen: 
                  - Las subastas
                  - La construcción
                  - El lavado en seco
                  - La agricultura
                  - La plomería
                  - Los restaurantes
                  - El comercio minorista
                  - Las máquinas expendedoras

Algunas licencias y permisos tienen plazo de vencimiento. Esté muy pendiente para renovarlos. Suele ser más fácil renovar que solicitarlos nuevos.

Tendrá que investigar sus requisitos a nivel estatal, de su condado y de su ciudad. Los requisitos para las industrias suelen variar con el estado. Visite el sitio web de su Secretaría de Estado para saber qué permisos y licencias necesitará.

### ¿Necesita ayuda? Obtenga asesoría empresarial gratuita

Encuentre asesores