alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §153. Existing laws unaffected by admission of Oklahoma; rights and jurisdiction of United States; indemnity school lands

Nothing in the Act of June 16, 1906, chapter 3335, Thirty-fourth Statutes, page 267, entitled, "An Act to enable the people of Oklahoma and of the Indian Territory to form a constitution and State government and be admitted into the Union on an equal footing with the original States * * *", shall repeal or affect any Act of Congress relating to the Sulphur Springs Reservation as defined on June 16, 1906, or as may be thereafter defined or extended, or the power of the United States over it or any other lands embraced in the State hereafter set aside by Congress as a national park, game preserve, or for the preservation of objects of archaeological or ethnological interest; and nothing contained in said Act shall interfere with the rights and ownership of the United States in any land hereafter set aside by Congress as national park, game preserve, or other reservation, or in the said Sulphur Springs Reservation, as it was on June 16, 1906, or may be defined or extended by law; but exclusive legislation, in all cases whatsoever, shall be exercised by the United States, which shall have exclusive control and jurisdiction over the same; but nothing in this section contained shall be construed to prevent the service within said Sulphur Springs Reservation or national parks, game preserves, and other reservations hereafter established by law, of civil and criminal processes lawfully issued by the authority of said State, and said State shall not be entitled to select indemnity school lands for the thirteenth, sixteenth, thirty-third, and thirty-sixth sections that may be embraced within the metes and bounds of the national park, game preserve, and other reservation or the said Sulphur Springs Reservation, as defined on June 16, 1906, or may be thereafter defined.

(June 16, 1906, ch. 3335, §7, 34 Stat. 272; June 29, 1906, No. 42, 34 Stat. 837; Pub. L. 94–235, §5, Mar. 17, 1976, 90 Stat. 236.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is from a proviso annexed to section 7 of act June 16, 1906.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Platt National Park designation repealed and areas formerly known as Platt National Park made an integral part of Chickasaw National Recreation Area by Pub. L. 94–235, §5. See section 460hh–4 of this title.

#### Repeals

Pub. L. 94–235, §5, repealed act June 29, 1906, No. 42, 34 Stat. 837, cited as a credit to this section, under which the name of the reservation at the village of Sulphur established by section 151 of this title, known as Sulphur Springs Reservation, had been renamed Platt National Park in honor of Orville Hitchcock Platt, former senator from Connecticut "and for many years a member of the Committee on Indian Affairs, in recognition of his distinguished services to the Indians and to the country."
#### § 345.61 Inmate earnings statement.

Each inmate worker in FPI shall be given a monthly earnings statement while actively working for FPI.
Evans

Gu

lch

Iowa

Gulch

OU4

CR3

CR-1

C

R

-

6

d

C

R

-

2

S Toledo St

CR-3b

CR-6

CR-2b

E

5th

St

E

6th

St

E

7th

St

CR-1b

C

R

-

6

c

C

R

-

3

8

a

CR-38

E

4th

St

CR-6b

CR-1c

CR-1a

E

11th

St

E

9th

St

E

8th

St

E

3rd

St

Z St

Ash St

CR-8

X St

E

2nd

St

Alder St

Monroe

St

Orange St

Oak St E 13th

St

CR-1a

CR-1a

CaliforniaGulch

Colorado

MapDate:January25,2013

MapProjection:UTM,Meters,13North,NAD83

DataSources:

OperableUnit&NPLBoundaries-U.S.EPARegion8(2013)

Streets-Navteq(2011)

RiversandStreams-CDOW(2004)

Imagery-Bing(2013)

*Boundariesarebasedonthenatureandextentofcontamination

andaresubjecttochange.

CaliforniaGulchSuperfundSite-

OperableUnit4

UpperCaliforniaGulch

RiversandStreams

NPLBoundary

Streets

OU4

05001,0002,000Feet

0125250500Meters
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ELTON L. LOWERY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-2211

[March 10, 2022]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Robert E. Belanger, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 2009CF004124A.

Elton L. Lowery, Milton, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IIA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 10 

Relating to a national emergency declared by the President on February 

15, 2019. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2019 

Mr. UDALL (for himself, Ms. COLLINS, Mrs. SHAHEEN, and Ms. MURKOWSKI) 

introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Relating to a national emergency declared by the President 

on February 15, 2019. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That, pursuant to section 202 of the National Emer4 gencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622), the national emergency de5 clared by the finding of the President on February 15, 

6 2019, in Proclamation 9844 (84 Fed. Reg. 4949) is here7 by terminated. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          83,152
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,905
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,564
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               117,354
<PP&E>                                          71,960
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,765
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 179,223
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,674
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           199
<OTHER-SE>                                     109,040
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   179,223
<SALES>                                        331,753
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               331,753
<CGS>                                          299,531
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  299,531
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 443
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 36,184
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,113
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,071
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          800
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,271
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.99



</TABLE>
Exhibit 99(c)

Report of Audit Committee



GREAT NORTHERN IRON ORE PROPERTIES

Report of Audit Committee

Year Ended December 31, 2006



The Audit Committee oversees the Trusts financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Trustees. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process including the systems of internal controls. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed the audited financial statements in the Annual Report with management including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.



The Audit Committee reviewed with the independent auditors, who are responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, their judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Trusts accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the Audit Committee under auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. In addition, the Audit Committee has discussed with the independent auditors the auditors independence from management and the Trust including the matters in the written disclosures required by the Independence Standards Board.



The Audit Committee discussed with the Trusts independent auditors the overall scope and plans for their audit. The Audit Committee met with the independent auditors, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examination, their evaluation of the Trusts internal controls and the overall quality of the Trusts financial reporting.



The Board of Trustees accepted the Audit Committees reappointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors to the financial statements of the Trust for the year 2006. All audit and non-audit services (printing and reproduction services) were preapproved by the Audit Committee. Estimated fees in 2006 for the annual audit services are $75,750, for audited-related services are $1,300, for tax services are $0 and for all other services are $2,750. Fees paid in 2005 for the annual audit services were $67,700, for audit-related services were $1,300, for tax services were $0 and for all other services were $2,750.



In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Trustees that the audited financial statements be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

---

Report of Audit Committee (continued)



Respectfully submitted,



/s/ Robert A. SteinRobert A. Stein, Audit Committee Chairman/s/ Roger W. StaehleRoger W. Staehle, Audit Committee Member/s/ John H. Roe, IIIJohn H. Roe, III, Audit Committee Member
        
        Dated:February 14, 2007


---
### §7807. Sense of Congress

It is the sense of Congress that States should enact the Uniform Athlete Agents Act of 2000 drafted by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, to protect student athletes and the integrity of amateur sports from unscrupulous sports agents. In particular, it is the sense of Congress that States should enact the provisions relating to the registration of sports agents, the required form of contract, the right of the student athlete to cancel an agency contract, the disclosure requirements relating to record maintenance, reporting, renewal, notice, warning, and security, and the provisions for reciprocity among the States.

(Pub. L. 108–304, §8, Sept. 24, 2004, 118 Stat. 1129.)
#### Wilson *v.*Granger & Lewis.

Lumpkin, J.

1. The plaintiff filed a petition in the superior court, alleging a complicated state of facts including the taking up by the defendants, for her benefit, of several claims, one being transferred at less than the full amount due on it, the shipment of lumber by the plaintiff *681from a sawmill for tlie purpose of discharging' the indebtedness, the taking possession of the sawmill and operating it by the defendants, the sale of' the property by them, and the buying of a tract of timbered land by them, taking title in their names but allowing the timber 'to be cut and used at the plaintiff’s mill. It was alleged that “said matters of account, being of an intricate and complicated nature, can not be adequately and properly considered in a court of law; and it is necessary, in order that your petitioner may have adequate and complete relief, that an accounting- he had under the equitable powers of the court.” Discovery was waived. The prayers were, for judgment for an amount which was alleged to be due from the defendants to the plaintiff, that an auditor be appointed “to prepare an accounting” between the parties, and for process. Two amendments were filed to the petition, which referred to it as “in equity.” The answer of the defendants likewise so characterized the case, as did also the process and the various entries on the papers. An auditor was appointed, who filed a report adverse to the contentions of the plaintiff. She filed exceptions. At the hearing, counsel for plaintiff contended that the cause was one at law and that the plaintiff was entitled to a jury trial on the exceptions of fact to the auditor’s report, as matter of right, instead of treating them as subject to be approved or disapproved by the presiding judge, as in cases of an equitable character. *Held,*that such contention was properly overruled.

June 25, 1910.

Exceptions to auditor’s report. Before Judge Charlton. Chat-ham superior court.

August 28, 1909.

*Twiggs & Gazan,*for plaintiff.

*Osborne & Lawrence,*for defendant.

2. Upon a careful consideration of the auditor’s report, the various exceptions filed by the plaintiff thereto, and the evidence, it is held that there was no error in overruling such exceptions and sustaining the findings of the auditor. *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Denied and Opinion Filed February 2, 2017 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-00046-CV IN RE MICHAEL C. WADE, Relator Original Proceeding from the 397th Judicial District Court Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 051329 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Fillmore, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Bridges Before the Court is relator’s January 12, 2017 petition for writ of mandamus. Relator’s petition does not include any appendix material s and is not certified as required by rule 52.3. T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.3(j); T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.3(k)(1)(a) (appendix must contain certified or sworn copy of order complained of, or any other do cument showing the matter complained of); T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.7(a) (relator must file with petition certified or sworn copy of every document material to relator’s claim for relief). It is re lator’s burden to provide the court with a record sufficient to establish his right to relief. Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex.1992); T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.3(k), 52.7(a). He has not done so here. Accordingly, we deny relator’s January 12, 2017 petition for writ of mandamus.

170046F.P05 /David L. Bridges/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2013-0867

 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM115AD

777-27A0078 --- 9/10/09

777-55A0010 --- 10/26/00

777-55A0014 --- 5/8/08

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
#### SMITH *et al. v.*INGRAM *et al.*

No error of law is alleged, and the verdict is supported by the evidence.

May 11, 1910.

Trespass. Before Judge Felton. Houston superior court.

April *22,*1909.

*R. N. Holtzclaw,*for plaintiffs.

*H. A. Mathews,*for defendants.

Evans, P. J.

The plaintiffs'and defendants were adjoining landowners, and the agents of the latter crossed over the line and cut 107 pine trees on the plaintiffs' land and manufactured them into lumber. The plaintiffs alleged that the trespass was wilful, and sued for the value of the timber as converted into lumber. It was shown on the trial that the 107 trees were worth from 35 to 40 cents per tree, that they produced between forty and fifty thousand feet of lumber, which was worth one dollar per hundred feet. The jury returned a verdict for $42.80, and the plaintiffs moved for a new trial, which was refused, and they except. The contention of the *524plaintiffs is that the evidence demanded a larger verdict. “Where plaintiff recovers for timber cut and carried away, the measure'of damages is: 1. Where defendant is a willful trespasser, the full value of the property at the time and place of demand or suit brought; without deduction for his labor or expense. 2. Where a defendant is an unintentional or innocent trespasser, or innocent vendee from such trespasser, the value at the time of conversion less the value he or his vendor added to the property.” Civil Code, § 3918. The court instructed the jury accordingly. Under the evidence the jury were not bound to find that the trespass was willful. They were authorized to find that the trespass was unintentional, and that the plaintiffs were not entitled to recover the accretion of value to the trees produced by their manufacture into lumber. The value of the timber at the time of the conversion was from 35 to 40 cents per tree, and the verdict is for the equivalent of 107 trees at 40 cents per tree. As no error of law is complained of, the judgment refusing a new trial will not be disturbed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
### §3202. Definitions

For purposes of this chapter—

(1) The term "gas consumer" means any person, State agency, or Federal agency, to which natural gas is sold other than for purposes of resale.

(2) The term "gas utility" means any person, State agency, or Federal agency, engaged in the local distribution of natural gas, and the sale of natural gas to any ultimate consumer of natural gas.

(3) The term "State regulated gas utility" means any gas utility with respect to which a State regulatory authority has ratemaking authority.

(4) The term "nonregulated gas utility" means any gas utility other than a State regulated gas utility.

(5) The term "rate" means any (A) price, rate, charge, or classification made, demanded, observed, or received with respect to sale of natural gas to a gas consumer, (B) any rule, regulation, or practice respecting any such rate, charge, or classification, and (C) any contract pertaining to the sale of natural gas to a gas consumer.

(6) The term "ratemaking authority" means authority to fix, modify, approve, or disapprove rates.

(7) The term "sale" when used with respect to natural gas, includes an exchange of natural gas.

(8) The term "State regulatory authority" means any State agency which has ratemaking authority with respect to the sale of natural gas by any gas utility (other than by such State agency).

(9) The term "integrated resource planning" means, in the case of a gas utility, planning by the use of any standard, regulation, practice, or policy to undertake a systematic comparison between demand-side management measures and the supply of gas by a gas utility to minimize life-cycle costs of adequate and reliable utility services to gas consumers. Integrated resource planning shall take into account necessary features for system operation such as diversity, reliability, dispatchability, and other factors of risk and shall treat demand and supply to gas consumers on a consistent and integrated basis.

(10) The term "demand-side management" includes energy conservation, energy efficiency, and load management techniques.

(Pub. L. 95–617, title III, §302, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3150; Pub. L. 102–486, title I, §115(a), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2803.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pars. (9), (10). Pub. L. 102–486 added pars. (9) and (10).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Additional Definitions

Except as otherwise specifically provided, the definitions in section 2602 of Title 16, Conservation, apply to this chapter.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 For purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Robert W. Humphreys, the Chief Executive
Officer of Delta Apparel, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that to the
best of his knowledge:  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended October 2, 2004 of the Company, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. Date:  November 8, 2004
    /s/ Robert W. HumphreysRobert W. HumphreysPresident & Chief Executive Officer A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to Delta Apparel, Inc. and will be retained by Delta Apparel, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 4.1
                        Specimen Common Stock Certificate


                          BOOCHM SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED
              Incorporated under the laws of the State of Colorado
                The Corporation is authorized to issue 50,000,000
                          Common Shares - No Par Value


    Number____                                                  Shares____


THIS CERTIFIES that

is the registered holder of

shares  tansferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in
person or by Attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be
signed by its duly  authorized  officers and its  Corporate  Seal to be hereunto
affixed.

this ______________ day     of _______________    A.D. _____________



By: _________________          (SEAL)             By: __________________
       President                                         Secretary


                          [Reverse side of Certificate]

     For Value  Received,  _________  hereby  sell,  assign  and  transfer  unto
________________  Shares  represented by the within  Certificate,  and do hereby
irrevocably constitute and appoint  __________________  Attorney to transfer the
said  Shares on the books of the  within  named  Corporated  with full  power of
substitution in the premises.

Dated________________
In presence of ____________________

NOTICE:  The  signature  of this  assignment  must  correspond  with the name as
written  upon  the  face  of  the  certificate,  in  every  particular,  without
alteration or enlargement, or any change whatever.
### §273e. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–207, §6, Dec. 18, 1971, 85 Stat. 740, authorized the Secretary to conduct a study of proposed road alinements within and adjacent to the park and to submit a report on the findings and conclusions of the study to the Congress within two years of Dec. 18, 1971.
### §7462. International cybersecurity technical standards

#### (a) In general

The Director, in coordination with appropriate Federal authorities, shall—

(1) as appropriate, ensure coordination of Federal agencies engaged in the development of international technical standards related to information system security; and

(2) not later than 1 year after December 18, 2014, develop and transmit to Congress a plan for ensuring such Federal agency coordination.

#### (b) Consultation with the private sector

In carrying out the activities specified in subsection (a)(1), the Director shall ensure consultation with appropriate private sector stakeholders.

(Pub. L. 113–274, title V, §502, Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 2986.)
- Home
- Newsroom

# Latest Updates

      If you are interested in searching for press releases prior to 2021, please visit our News Archive.    

# Pagination

-  «« First 
-  ‹‹‹ 
-  1 
-  2 
-  3 
-  4
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE02994

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.