alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 17.28 Automatic declassification. ( a ) Subject to paragraph (b) of this section, all classified information contained in records that are more than 25 years old that have been determined to have permanent historical value shall be declassified automatically on April 17, 2000. Subsequently, all classified information in such records shall be automatically declassified not later than 25 years after the date of its original classification with the exception of specific information exempt from automatic declassification pursuant to section 3.4 (b) and (d) of Executive Order 12958.
( b ) At least 220 days before information is declassified automatically under this section, the respective component head shall notify the Assistant Attorney General for Administration through the Department Security Officer of any specific information they propose to exempt from automatic declassification. The notification shall include: ( 1 ) A description of the information;
( 2 ) An explanation of why the information is exempt from automatic declassification and must remain classified for a longer period of time; and
( 3 ) A specific date or event for declassification of the information whenever the information exempted does not identify a confidential human source or human intelligence source.
( c ) Proposed exemptions under this section shall be forwarded to the DRC, which shall recommend a disposition of the exemption request to the Assistant Attorney General for Administration. When the Assistant Attorney General for Administration determines the exemption request is consistent with this section, he or she will submit it to the Executive Secretary of the Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel.
( d ) Declassification guides that narrowly and precisely define exempted information may be used to exempt information from automatic declassification. Declassification guides must include the exemption notification information detailed in paragraph (b) of this section, and be approved pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section.
HomeLatest FilingsPrevious Page

    - SEC Home  »
    - Search the Next-Generation EDGAR System  »
    - Company Search  »
    - Current Page

3011 PONCE DE LEON BLVDSTE. 1420CORAL GABLES FL 33134         

3011 PONCE DE LEON BLVDSTE. 1420CORAL GABLES FL 33134         (786) 662-3114

Axxes Private Markets Fund CIK#: 0001938365 (see all company filings)
State location: FL | State of Inc.: **DE** | Fiscal Year End: 1231Get **insider transactions** for this **issuer**.File Number: **812-15537**

||
||
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 29 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 29

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign 
 military sale to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia certain defense articles 
                             and services.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the following proposed 
foreign military sale to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is prohibited:
            (1) The sale of the following defense articles, including 
        defense services and technical data, described in Transmittal 
        No. 19-01, submitted to Congress pursuant to section 36(b) of 
        the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(b)) and published 
        in the Congressional Record on June 4, 2019: The proposed sale 
        of follow-on logistics support and service for the Royal Saudi 
        Air Force aircraft, engines, and weapons; publications and 
        technical documentation; support equipment; spare and repair 
        parts; repair and return; calibration support and test 
        equipment; personnel equipment; United States Government and 
        contractor technical and logistics support; and other elements 
        of program support.

            Passed the Senate June 20, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. J. RES. 29

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

    Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign 
 military sale to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia certain defense articles 
                             and services.
```
### §3161. Congressional declaration of findings

Congress finds that—

(a) Alaska's transportation and utility network is largely undeveloped and the future needs for transportation and utility systems in Alaska would best be identified and provided for through an orderly, continuous decisionmaking process involving the State and Federal Governments and the public;

(b) the existing authorities to approve or disapprove applications for transportation and utility systems through public lands in Alaska are diverse, dissimilar, and, in some cases, absent; and

(c) to minimize the adverse impacts of siting transportation and utility systems within units established or expanded by this Act and to insure the effectiveness of the decisionmaking process, a single comprehensive statutory authority for the approval or disapproval of applications for such systems must be provided in this Act.

(Pub. L. 96–487, title XI, §1101, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2457.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in subsec. (c), is Pub. L 96–487, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2371, known as the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3101 of this title and Tables.
IN THE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

Sitting at Houston, TX

NO. 01-15-00275-CR

WALTER BALLARD,

Appellant,

Versus

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee.

Appeal from the 183rd Judicial District Court

Harris County, Texas- Cause No. 1390115

Honorable Vanessa Velasquez Presiding

APPELLANT’S SECOND MOTION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF 

THE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS:

MAVERICK J. RAY, undersigned counsel for Appellant, respectfully 

moves for an extension of time to file Appellant's Opening Brief and for cause 

would show as follows:

1. Appellant was convicted of Possession of a Child Pornography in Cause No. 

1390115.

2. Timely notice of appeal was given.

3. The time for filing Appellant's brief expired on August 28, 2015. The failure 

to seek an extension prior to that time was not intentional or deliberate.

4. Counsel has had six jury trials set which has caused counsel to spend extra 

ACCEPTED

01-15-00275-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

9/2/2015 6:30:19 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/2/2015 6:30:19 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
time prepping for trial and has not allowed significant time to finish the brief 

in this case. Further, Appellant has moved around between five different 

facilities since his incarceration in March of this year and numerous 

communications, documents, and writings concerning Appellant’s brief sent 

back and forth between counsel and Appellant have failed to reach its proper 

destination causing certain issues to not be ready to submit for review.

5. Granting leave to file and extending the time for filing the Appellant's 

Opening Brief will work no prejudice to the State of Texas in the preparation 

and filing of the Appellee's Brief

6. This request is being made not for the purpose of delay but that justice may 

be done and that Appellant may realize his right to appeal.

7. Appellant is requesting an extension of at least two months.

For all of the reasons set forth above. Appellant requests and pays this Court 

to enter an order granting an extension for the time to file Appellant's Opening 

Brief.

Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Maverick J. Ray

MAVERICK RAY

1419 Franklin ST.

Houston, Texas 77002

Telephone: (281) 947-2007

Facsimile: (713) 714-2225

SBN: 24080451 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Undersigned counsel certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and

foregoing Motion for Extension of time to file Brief has been this day placed in the 

United States Mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the office of the Harris County

District Attorney's office, appellate division, 1201 Franklin, Ste. 600, Houston, 

Texas 77002.

/s/ Maverick J. Ray

MAVERICK J. RAY
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1431

TIMOTHY E. FINLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

TIMOTHY M. CONROY, Narcotics Detective, in his individual 

and official capacity; BOBBY CARIAS, Narcotics Detective, in

his individual and official capacity; DAVE M. HENDERSON, 

Captain, in his individual and official capacity; WILLIE L. 

JOHNSON, Chief of Police, in his individual and official 

capacity; WILLIAM D. RICHARDSON; OSHUN CYRUS HINTON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior 

District Judge. (6:11-00196-HFF-KFM)

Submitted: August 18, 2011 Decided: August 22, 2011

Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy E. Finley, Appellant Pro Se. O. Cyrus Hinton, O. CYRUS 

HINTON LAW OFFICES, Rock Hill, South Carolina; William D. 

Richardson, Easley, South Carolina; Appellees Pro Se; Nathaniel 

Heyward Clarkson, III, Amy Miller Snyder, CLARKSON WALSH TERRELL 

& COULTER, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Timothy E. Finley seeks to appeal the district court 

order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation 

and dismissing without prejudice two Defendants. This court may 

exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 

(2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 

U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial 

Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order

Finley seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an 

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we 

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of WOM, Inc. (the “Company”)on
      Form 10-QSB
      for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Frederic M. Zinn, the principal
      executive officer and Michael L. Vizzie, principal financial officer, certifies
      pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      August 14, 2006














/s/
      Frederic M. Zinn


Frederic
      M. Zinn

















/s/
      Michael L. Vizzie


Michael
      L. Vizzie
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 118 (Monday, June 20, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 35938]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-15290]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7505]

The Designation of Othman al-Ghamdi Also Known as Al Umairah al-
Ghamdi, Also Known as Uthman al-Ghamdi, Also Known as Uthman al-
Ghamidi, Also Known as Uthman Ahmad Uthman al-Ghamdi, Also Known as 
Othman Ahmed Othman al-Omirah as a Specially Designated Global 
Terrorist Pursuant to Section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224, as Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the individual known as Othman al-Ghamdi 
and also known as Uthman al-Ghamdi, also known as Uthman al-Ghamidi, 
also known as Uthman Ahmad Uthman al-Ghamdi, also known as Othman Ahmed 
Othman al-Omirah committed, or poses a significant risk of committing, 
acts of terrorism that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the 
national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: May 11, 2011.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-15290 Filed 6-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Darden consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. ** 

§ 636(c).

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision ***

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GERALDINE KELLEY DARDEN,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

MOHAMMED ARAIN,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 12-17814

D.C. No. 1:12-cv-00663-SKO

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Sheila K. Oberto, Magistrate Judge, Presiding** 

Submitted September 24, 2013*** 

Before: RAWLINSON, N.R. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Geraldine Kelley Darden appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging

FILED

OCT 04 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-17814

deliberate indifference to her serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under

28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal under 28

U.S.C. §§ 1915A and 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th

Cir. 2000); Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998) (order). We

affirm. 

The district court properly dismissed Darden’s action because Darden did

not allege facts showing that defendant acted with deliberate indifference when

performing the lumpectomy or responding to Darden’s medical needs. See

Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1057-58, 1060 (9th Cir. 2004) (deliberate

indifference is a high legal standard, and it is met only if the defendant knows of

and disregards an excessive risk to the prisoner’s health and safety; mistakes,

negligence or malpractice do not rise to an Eighth Amendment violation).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Darden’s motion for

appointment of counsel because Darden failed to demonstrate exceptional

circumstances. See Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009) (setting

forth standard of review and “exceptional circumstances” requirement for

appointment of counsel).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the action

without first providing an opportunity to amend after concluding that amendment
3 12-17814

would be futile. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1130 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc)

(setting forth standard of review and explaining that dismissal without leave to

amend is appropriate where the pleading cannot be cured by alleging other facts).

Darden’s contentions concerning alleged denial of due process and equal

access are unpersuasive and not supported by the record.

Darden’s motions to add the legal principle of res judicata, filed on

February 6, 2013 and March 19, 2013, are denied as unnecessary.

AFFIRMED.
September 21, 2017



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DOMINGO AMARO

- SOLIS , Appellant

NO. 14

- 16

- 00484

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
### **CHAPTER 21B—PROHIBITION OF CERTAIN FOREIGN FISHING VESSELS IN UNITED STATES FISHERIES**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                        JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                          JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                      0
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            0
<PP&E>                                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  16,395
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                  375
<OTHER-SE>                                            (16,770)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                0
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            0
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       16,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (16,300)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (16,300)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (16,300)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.04)



</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 66 (Monday, April 7, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19050-19051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-07598]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the South Carolina 
Advisory Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) and the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) that a meeting of the South 
Carolina Advisory Committee (Committee) to the Commission will convene 
at 10:00 a.m. and adjourn at approximately 11:30 a.m. on Wednesday, 
April 23, 2014. The meeting will be held at the Richland County Public 
Library, 1431 Assembly Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201. The 
purpose of the meeting is for the Committee to plan its voting rights 
project.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. 
Comments must be received in the regional office by May 23, 2014. 
Comments may be mailed to Peter Minarik at the Southern Regional 
Office, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 61 Forsyth St., SW., Suite 
16T126, Atlanta, GA, 30303. They may also be faxed to the Committee at 
(404) 562-7005 or emailed to pminarik@usccr.gov. Persons who desire 
additional information may contact the Southern Regional Office at 
(404) 562-7000.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Southern 
Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled 
date of the meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Southern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
www.usccr.gov, or to contact the

[[Page 19051]]

Southern Regional Office at the above email or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated April 1, 2014.
David Mussatt,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2014-07598 Filed 4-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In  connection  with the  Quaterly  Report on Form 10-Q of North Shore
Capital IV, Inc., (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2002, filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the  "Report"),  I, Gerard Werner,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects,  the consolidated  financial  condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and consolidated  results of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.

Dated: October 3, 2005

/s/ Gerard Werner
Chief Executive Officer
October 3, 2005

This  certification  has been  furnished  solely  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.