alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§1029, 1030. Repealed. Pub. L. 102–567, title VIII, §814, Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4316, and Pub. L. 102–587, title VIII, §8014, Nov. 4, 1992, 106 Stat. 5106

Section 1029, acts Aug. 12, 1954, ch. 669, §10, 68 Stat. 699; Oct. 9, 1972, Pub. L. 92–471, title I, §104, 86 Stat. 784; July 28, 1978, Pub. L. 95–326, §1(7), 92 Stat. 402, related to unlawful activities.

Section 1030, acts Aug. 12, 1954, ch. 669, §11, 68 Stat. 700; Oct. 9, 1972, Pub. L. 92–471, title I, §105, 86 Stat. 785; July 28, 1978, Pub. L. 95–326, §1(8), 92 Stat. 402; Oct. 30, 1978, Pub. L. 95–553, §1(1), 92 Stat. 2072, related to penalties.
|    | Organizational      Structure |
|--------------|-------------------------------|

| B+H      OCEAN CARRIERS LTD.  | Parent                 |                                                  |
|-------------------------------|------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                          |                   |                                                  |
| OBO      HOLDINGS LTD.        | 100%      Wholly-owned |                                                  |
| Subsidiaries:                 |                   |                                                  |
| BHOBO      ONE LTD.           | 100%      Wholly-owned | Owns      M/V BONNIE SMITHWICK                        |
| BHOBO      TWO LTD.           | 100%      Wholly-owned | Owns      M/V RIP HUDNER                              |
| BHOBO      THREE LTD.         | 100%      Wholly-owned | Owns      M/V SEAROSE G                               |
| RMJ      SHIPPING LTD.        | 100%      Wholly-owned | Owns      M/V ROGER M JONES                           |
| SAGAMORE      SHIPPING CORP.  | 100%      Wholly-owned | Owns      M/T SAGAMORE                                |
|                          |                   |                                                  |
| SEASAK      OBO HOLDINGS LTD. | 100%      Wholly-owned |                                                  |
| Subsidiaries:                 |                   |                                                  |
| SAKONNET      SHIPPING LTD.   | 100%      Wholly-owned | Owner      of M/V SAKONNET                            |
| SEAPOWET      TRADING LTD.    | 100%      Wholly-owned | Disponent      Owner of 50% of M/V SEAPOWET (1)       |
| SACHEM      SHIPPING LTD.     | 100%      Wholly-owned | Owned      M/V SACHEM, which was sold in January 2010 |
|                          |                   |                                                  |
| STRAITS      OFFSHORE LTD     | 100%      Wholly-owned | Buyer      of now-cancelled AFDV                      |
|                          |                   |                                                  |

----
Carol R. Gosain 202 429 6461 cgosain@steptoe.com 1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036-1795 202 429 3000 main www.steptoe.com STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP

October 14, 2014 Mr. PaulL. Gretch Director, Office ofInternational Aviation U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 

### Re: JAL Express Co., Ltd. Docket DOT-OST-2005-22258 Dear Mr. Gretch: We would like to inform you that JAL Express Co., Ltd. ("JEX") was integrated into Japan Airlines Co., Ltd. ("JAL") effective October 1, 2014. Because JEX no longer has a separate existence, the exemption authority and statement ofauthorization granted to JEX in the above-referenced docket are no longer necessary. The Departmentmay, for good order's sake, wish to cancel these authorities, which will not lapse by their ownterms. 1 Please feel free to contactus at (202) 429-6461 ifyou have any questions or need any additional information.

cc: Mr. Robert Finamore Ms. Shelita Smith Sincerely, 

# C:x_'"v·-c

# GoZ\CL~" William Karas Carol Gosain Attorneys for Japan Airlines Co., Ltd.

1 The Department granted the authorities by Notice ofAction Taken issued inthe abovereferenced docket on October 12, 2005. The authorities were to expire on October 12, 2006. On September 15, 2006, JEX filed a requestto renewthem. Since the Departmenthas not yet acted on that request, the authorities remain in effectpursuantto 5 U.S.C. § 558(c) and Part 377 ofthe Department's regulations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>





<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-17-2000
<CASH>                                           7,568
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,792
<ALLOWANCES>                                       738
<INVENTORY>                                     55,214
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                74,861
<PP&E>                                         109,263
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,491
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 174,994
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,457
<BONDS>                                         60,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            49
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,052
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   174,994
<SALES>                                        279,227
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               279,227
<CGS>                                          214,271
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  214,271
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                59,782
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,453
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    721
<INCOME-TAX>                                       274
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                447
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       447
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09









</TABLE>
Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) of Great Northern Iron Ore Properties of our reports dated January 27, 2006, with respect to the financial statements of
Great Northern Iron Ore Properties, Great Northern Iron Ore Properties managements assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Great Northern
Iron Ore Properties, included in the 2005 Annual Report to Certificate Holders of Great Northern Iron Ore Properties.

/s/   Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
January 27, 2006

---
Continuing Eligibility for the 

HUBZone Program: How Do 

Program Examinations Work?

What to expect 

New HUBZone regulations require all certified 

HUBZone firms to undergo a program examination 

at least every three years to ensure continued 

program eligibility. Through the program 

examination process, SBA officials verify the 

accuracy of any certification made or information 

provided by firms as part of their HUBZone 

application or recertification. 

• SBA will conduct a program examination 

as part of the recertification process three 

years after a firm’s HUBZone certification 

or at least every three years after the firm’s 

last program examination, whichever date 

is later.

• SBA will determine the location and scope 

of the examination and may review any 

information related to the firm’s HUBZone 

eligibility including, but not limited to, 

documentation related to ownership of the 

firm, as well as compliance with the 

35 percent HUBZone residency and 

principal office requirements. 

These measures increase value of 

HUBZone certification by ensuring only 

eligible firms benefit from the program. 
Program Examination Process Timeline

If your firm is subject to a program examination, 

you will receive an email notice about 30 calendar 

days after completing your mandatory annual 

recertification.

You should gather all documents proving your 

firm met the eligibility requirements as of the 

current anniversary of its certification. 

Respond to the notice within 30 calendar days of 

receipt by 

• Providing the documents requested in the

notice, or

• Voluntarily withdrawing from the HUBZone

program within 30 calendar days of receipt of

the notice by submitting a Voluntary

Decertification Agreement form.

If a firm fails to respond, SBA may propose 

decertification based on its failure to cooperate 

with the program examination.

Possible outcomes of a program examination 

include: 

• SBA determines that the firm is eligible. In

this case, SBA will send a written notice to the

firm, and the firm will maintain its certified

HUBZone status in DSBS.

• SBA determines that the firm is not eligible.

In this case, SBA will send a written notice of

proposed decertification and the firm will

have 30 days to submit documentation

supporting its eligibility. The email will

include specific instructions for responding.

You’ll need to provide 

documents similar to those 

submitted with your initial 

application, which may 

include: 

• Corporate documents

• Firm employee and

location lists

• Payroll records

• Utility bills

• Employee HUBZone

residency documents

• Principal office lease,

rental agreement, or deed

Use the checklists on 

the website to get more 

information about these 

documents. 

For more information: 

• Visit sba.gov/hubzone

• Email the HUBZone Help

Desk at hubzone@sba.gov

• Visit SBA’s local assistance

website

The HUBZone program fuels small business growth in historically underutilized business zones (HUBZones) 

with a goal of awarding at least 3 percent of federal contract dollars to HUBZone-certified companies each year.
### §1447e. Report on research program

#### (a) Preparation and submission of report

Each Board receiving a grant under section 1447d of this title shall, not later than 2 years after the approval of its comprehensive plan under section 1447d of this title and at 2-year intervals thereafter, prepare and submit to the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency a report describing—

(1) the findings and conclusions of research projects conducted in the region;

(2) recommendations for improvements in the design or implementation of programs for the protection of the marine environment; and

(3) available data and information concerning ecosystem health within the region.

#### (b) Transmittal to Congress

Upon receipt of a report prepared by a Board under subsection (a), the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall transmit a copy of such report to the Committees on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and to the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries of the House of Representatives.

(Pub. L. 92–532, title IV, §406, as added Pub. L. 101–593, title III, §301, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 2969.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Abolition of House Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries of House of Representatives abolished and its jurisdiction transferred by House Resolution No. 6, One Hundred Fourth Congress, Jan. 4, 1995. Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries of House of Representatives treated as referring to Committee on Science of House of Representatives in case of provisions relating to marine research by section 1(b)(3) of Pub. L. 104–14, set out as a note preceding section 21 of Title 2, The Congress. Committee on Science of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Science and Technology of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 6, One Hundred Tenth Congress, Jan. 5, 2007. Committee on Science and Technology of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, Jan. 5, 2011.
Mga Sintomas ng Coronavirus (COVID-19)

cdc.gov/coronavirus

316475-U 06/02/2020

Alamin ang mga sintomas ng COVID-19, na maaaring kabilangan 

ng sumusunod:

*Humingi kaagad ng pangangalagang medikal kung ang isang tao 

ay may emerhensiyang mga babalang palatandaan ng COVID-19.

• Problema sa paghinga

• Patuloy na pananakit o 

presyon sa dibdib

• Bagong pagkalito

• Hindi kayang magising o 

manatiling gising

• Maasul na mga labi 

o mukha

Pag-ubo Panginginig Pananakit ng kalamnan

Pangangapos ng hininga 

o hirap sa paghinga*

Bagong pagkawala ng 

panlasa o pang-amoy

Masakit na lalamunan

Ang mga sintomas ay maaaring mula banayad hanggang malubhang 

karamdaman, at lumalabas sa 2-14 na araw pagkatapos mong 

malantad sa virus na nagdudulot ng COVID-19. 

Hindi kasama sa listahang ito ang lahat ng posibleng sintomas. Mangyaring tawagan 

kaagad ang iyong tagapagbigay ng medikal na serbisyo para sa anumang iba pang mga 

sintomas na malubha o nakakabahala sa iyo.

Lagnat
### §3459. Supplemental authority of the Secretary

The authority of the Secretary under this subchapter to assist councils in the development and implementation of area plans shall be supplemental to, and not in lieu of, any authority of the Secretary under any other provision of law.

(Pub. L. 97–98, title XV, §1536, as added Pub. L. 107–171, title II, §2504, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 274.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3459, Pub. L. 97–98, title XV, §1536, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1340; Pub. L. 101–624, title XIV, §1452(a), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3611, related to limitation on assistance, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 107–171.
#### § 45.13 Duty to cooperate in an official investigation.

Department employees have a duty to, and shall, cooperate fully with the Office of the Inspector General and Office of Professional Responsibility, and shall respond to questions posed during the course of an investigation upon being informed that their statement will not be used to incriminate them in a criminal proceeding. Refusal to cooperate could lead to disciplinary action.

[Order No. 2835-2006, 71 FR 54414, Sept. 15, 2006]
s130029.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

SNUN:13-0029

Focus Ready Draft 7/11/2013

MSDS: No Label: No

TLV/PEL:

MSDS not included with submission.

 

Page 1

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 4
s130029.eng

 

 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

SNUN:13-0029

 

Page 2

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 4
s130029.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

SNUN:13-0029

 

Page 3

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 4
s130029.eng

Page 4

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 4
Exhibit






December 31, 2015


Re:    Renewal of Amended and Restated Retention Agreement
Dear John:
This letter is to serve as your notification that Ply Gem Industries, Inc. has elected to execute its Renewal Term right under your current Amended and Restated Retention Agreement dated December 31, 2008 for a period of one year.  As such, all applicable rights and terms as outlined in your Amended and Restated Retention Agreement will remain in effect through December 31, 2016.
Please sign this letter in the space provided below as your acknowledgement and agreement of this Renewal Term agreement and return this original to me, and retain a copy for your own records.
	
		
	 
	Sincerely,

	 
	 

	 
	PLY GEM INDUSTRIES, INC.

	 
	 

	 
	By:  /s/ Gary E. Robinette

	 
	Name:  Gary E. Robinette

	 
	Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	Acknowledged and Agreed:
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	/s/ John C. Wayne
	 

	John C. Wayne
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 15




                    ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


Board of Directors
The MIIX Group, Incorporated

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8) of The MIIX Group, Incorporated, pertaining to the amended and
restated 1998 Long Term Incentive Equity Plan of The MIIX Group, Incorporated,
of our report dated August 1, 2001 relating to the unaudited consolidated
interim financial statements of The MIIX Group, Incorporated and subsidiaries
included in this Form 10-Q filed on August 13, 2001 for the quarter ended June
30, 2001.

                                                   ERNST & YOUNG LLP


New York, New York
August 1, 2001
# C_2012235EN.01000402.xml

| 4.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/4

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 March 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d'instance de Paris — France) — Thomson Sales Europe SA v Administration des douanes (Direction Nationale du Renseignement et des Enquêtes douanières)

(Case C-348/11) (1)

1

(Articles 92(1) and 103(1) of the Rules of Procedure - Manifest inadmissibility - Article 104(3), second subparagraph, of the Rules of Procedure - Answer admitting of no reasonable doubt - Reference for a preliminary ruling - Assessment of validity - Common commercial policy - Dumping - Importation of televisions manufactured in Thailand - Validity of the investigation carried out by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) - Validity of Regulations (EC) Nos 710/95 and 2584/98)

2012/C 235/06

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal d’instance de Paris

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Thomson Sales Europe SA

Applicant:

Defendant: Administration des douanes (Direction Nationale du Renseignement et des Enquêtes douanières)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal d'instance de Paris — Validity of Council Regulation (EC) No 710/95 of 27 March 1995 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of colour television receivers originating in Malaysia, the People’s Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, Singapore and Thailand and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed (OJ 1995 L 73, p. 3) — Validity of Council Regulation (EC) No 2584/98 of 27 November 1998, amending Regulation (EC) No 710/95 (OJ 1998 L 324, p. 1) — Regulations applying a method consistent with zeroing to determine the weighted average dumping margin — Validity of the investigation carried out by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) on the origin of the televisions

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The examination of Questions 4 and 5 does not disclose any factor capable of affecting the validity of Council Regulation (EC) No 710/95 of 27 March 1995 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of colour television receivers originating in [Malaysia], the People’s Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, Singapore and Thailand and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed, or Council Regulation No 2584/98 of 27 November 1998, ameding Regulation No 710/95.

---

(1)  OJ C 282, 24.09.2011.

1

---
#### § 37.3 Exchange of information.

The EEOC, section 504 agencies, and designated agencies shall share any information relating to the employment policies and practices of a respondent that may assist each agency in carrying out its responsibilities, to the extent permissible by law. Such information shall include, but is not limited to, complaints, charges, investigative files, compliance review reports and files, affirmative action programs, and annual employment reports.
#### § 706.207 Use of Government property.

An employee shall not directly or indirectly use, or allow the use of, Government property of any kind, including property leased to the Government, for other than officially approved activities. An employee has a positive duty to protect and conserve Government property including equipment, supplies, and other property entrusted or issued to him.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 2, 2018

No. 04

- 16

- 00827

- CV

Frances M. BUPP , Martha King Berglund, Evelyn Seydler Martin, Andrea Lee Castillo, Mary C.

Forister, Shirley Dixon, and Cindy Foris ter

,

Appellants

v.

Harold Joe BISHOP , Jr., Individually and as Trustee of the Bishop Management Trust, General

Partner of J & K Bishop Partnership, LTD, and as Executor of the Estate of Melanie Kay Bishop,

Appellees

From the 81st Judicial District Cou rt, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15

- 01

- 00011

- CVK

Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Si tting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice (Not Participating)

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

T he court has considered the appellees ’ amended motion for en banc reconsideration and

the motion is DENIED

.

_________________________________ Rebe ca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 2nd day of February, 20 18

.

________________________________ ___ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
```

EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ISEmployement.com, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, THom
Hayward, President and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

                                                /s/ Thom Hayward
                                                ---------------------------
                                                    Thom Hayward
                                                    President(principal
                                                    executive officer)/Treasurer
                                                    (principal financial officer)
August 20, 2003
```
### SUBCHAPTER IV—FEES FOR USE OF NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM
§ 115.118 Upgrades to facilities and technologies. ( a ) When designing or acquiring any new lockup and in planning any substantial expansion or modification of existing lockups, the agency shall consider the effect of the design, acquisition, expansion, or modification upon the agency's ability to protect detainees from sexual abuse.
( b ) When installing or updating a video monitoring system, electronic surveillance system, or other monitoring technology, the agency shall consider how such technology may enhance the agency's ability to protect detainees from sexual abuse.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-24-00402-CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

367th District Court of Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. 23-4934-393

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Birdwell and Womack, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN RE TOMAHAWK TRUCKING, LLC AND DERRICK TERRELL BROWN, 

Relators
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and is of the 

opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ of 

mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered: September 13, 2024