alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1****SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Surgical Partners International, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I, William H. Wilcox, President and Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ William H. Wilcox  William H. Wilcox
§ 549.72 Services provided without fees. We will not charge a fee for: ( a ) Health care services based on staff referrals;
( b ) Staff-approved follow-up treatment for a chronic condition;
( c ) Preventive health care services;
( d ) Emergency services;
( e ) Prenatal care;
( f ) Diagnosis or treatment of chronic infectious diseases;
( g ) Mental health care; or
( h ) Substance abuse treatment.
§ 5.1 Administration and enforcement of the Act. ( a ) The administration and enforcement of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended (22 U.S.C. 611-621) (Act), subject to the general supervision and direction of the Attorney General, is assigned to, and conducted, handled, and supervised by, the Assistant Attorney General for National Security.
( b ) The Assistant Attorney General for National Security is authorized to prescribe such forms, in addition to or in lieu of those specified in the regulations in this part, as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this part.
( c ) Copies of the Act, and of the rules, regulations, and forms prescribed pursuant to the Act, and information concerning the foregoing may be obtained upon request without charge from the National Security Division, Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530.
[Order No. 2865-2007, 72 FR 10068, Mar. 7, 2007]
§ 115.342 Placement of residents in housing, bed, program, education, and work assignments. ( a ) The agency shall use all information obtained pursuant to § 115.341 and subsequently to make housing, bed, program, education, and work assignments for residents with the goal of keeping all residents safe and free from sexual abuse.
( b ) Residents may be isolated from others only as a last resort when less restrictive measures are inadequate to keep them and other residents safe, and then only until an alternative means of keeping all residents safe can be arranged. During any period of isolation, agencies shall not deny residents daily large-muscle exercise and any legally required educational programming or special education services. Residents in isolation shall receive daily visits from a medical or mental health care clinician. Residents shall also have access to other programs and work opportunities to the extent possible.
( c ) Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or intersex residents shall not be placed in particular housing, bed, or other assignments solely on the basis of such identification or status, nor shall agencies consider lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or intersex identification or status as an indicator of likelihood of being sexually abusive.
( d ) In deciding whether to assign a transgender or intersex resident to a facility for male or female residents, and in making other housing and programming assignments, the agency shall consider on a case-by-case basis whether a placement would ensure the resident's health and safety, and whether the placement would present management or security problems.
( e ) Placement and programming assignments for each transgender or intersex resident shall be reassessed at least twice each year to review any threats to safety experienced by the resident.
( f ) A transgender or intersex resident's own views with respect to his or her own safety shall be given serious consideration.
( g ) Transgender and intersex residents shall be given the opportunity to shower separately from other residents.
( h ) If a resident is isolated pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section, the facility shall clearly document: ( 1 ) The basis for the facility's concern for the resident's safety; and
( 2 ) The reason why no alternative means of separation can be arranged.
( i ) Every 30 days, the facility shall afford each resident described in paragraph (h) of this section a review to determine whether there is a continuing need for separation from the general population.
Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America                   [Allianz Logo]


Stewart Gregg, FSA, MAAA
Senior Counsel
Legal Department
5701 Golden Hills Drive
Minneapolis, MN  55416-1297

Telephone: 763/765 2913
Telefax: 763/765 6355
www.allianzlife.com


October 25, 2001


Board of Directors
Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America
5701 Golden Hills Drive
Minneapolis, MN 55416-1297



Re:     Opinion and Consent of Counsel
        Allianz Life Variable Account B

Dear Sir or Madam:

You have requested my Opinion of Counsel in connection  with the filing with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, of Post-Effective  Amendment No. 14 Registration  Statement on Form N-4
for the Individual  Immediate Variable Annuity Contracts to be issued by Allianz
Life Insurance Company of North America and its separate  account,  Allianz Life
Variable Account B File No. 33-76190.

I am of the following opinions:

1.  Allianz Life Variable  Account B is a unit investment  trust as that term is
    defined in Section 4(2) of the  Investment  Company Act of 1940 (the Act),
    and is currently  registered  with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission,
    pursuant to Section 8(a) of the Act.

2.  Upon the  acceptance of purchase  payments made by a Contract Owner pursuant
    to a Contract  issued in  accordance  with the  Prospectus  contained in the
    Registration  Statement  and upon  compliance  with  applicable  law, such a
    Contract  Owner  will  have  a  legally-issued,  fully-paid,  non-assessable
    contractual interest under such Contract.

You  may  use  this  opinion  letter,  or  copy  hereof,  as an  exhibit  to the
Registration Statement.

I consent to the  reference to me and to this opinion  under the caption  "Legal
Opinions"  contained in the  Statement of Additional  Information  which forms a
part of the Registration Statement.

Sincerely,



ALLIANZ LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA

By:/S/STEWART GREGG
   -----------------
      Stewart Gregg
### §1201. Declaration of purposes; Secretary's cooperation with and assistance to States

For the purposes of conserving and protecting the fish and shellfish resources in the coastal waters of the United States and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and promoting and safeguarding water-based recreation for present and future generations in these waters, the Secretary of Commerce is authorized to cooperate with, and provide assistance to, the States in controlling and eliminating jellyfish, commonly referred to as "sea nettles", and other such pests and in conducting research for the purposes of controlling floating seaweed in such waters.

(Pub. L. 89–720, §1, Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1149; 1970 Reorg. Plan No. 4, eff. Oct. 3, 1970, 35 F.R. 15627, 84 Stat. 2090.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

"Secretary of Commerce" was substituted in text for "Secretary of the Interior" in view of: the creation of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in the Department of Commerce and the Office of Administrator of such Administration; the abolition of the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries in the Interior Department and the Office of Director of such Bureau; transfers of functions, including functions formerly vested by law in the Secretary of the Interior or the Interior Department which were administered through the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries or were primarily related to such Bureau, exclusive of certain enumerated functions with respect to Great Lakes fishery research, Missouri River Reservoir research, Gulf Breeze Biological Laboratory, and Trans-Alaska pipeline investigations; and transfer of marine sport fish programs of Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife by Reorg. Plan No. 4 of 1970, eff. Oct. 3, 1970, 35 F.R. 15627, 84 Stat. 2090, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
### §9059. Protection of collective bargaining agreement

#### (a) In general

Neither the Secretary, nor any other actor, department, or agency of the Federal Government, shall condition the issuance of a loan or loan guarantee under paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of section 9042(b) of this title on an air carrier's or eligible business's implementation of measures to enter into negotiations with the certified bargaining representative of a craft or class of employees of the air carrier or eligible business under the Railway Labor Act (45 U.S.C. 151 et seq.) or the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 151 et seq.), regarding pay or other terms and conditions of employment.

#### (b) Period of effect

With respect to an air carrier or eligible business to which the loan or loan guarantee is provided under this part, this section shall be in effect with respect to the air carrier or eligible business beginning on the date on which the air carrier or eligible business is first issued such loan or loan guarantee and ending on the date that is 1 year after the loan or loan guarantee is no longer outstanding.

(Pub. L. 116–136, div. A, title IV, §4025, Mar. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 494.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Railway Labor Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is act May 20, 1926, ch. 347, 44 Stat. 577, which is classified principally to chapter 8 (§151 et seq.) of Title 45, Railroads. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 151 of Title 45 and Tables.

The National Labor Relations Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is act July 5, 1935, ch. 372, 49 Stat. 449, which is classified generally to subchapter II (§151 et seq.) of chapter 7 of Title 29, Labor. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 167 of Title 29 and Tables.

This part, referred to in subsec. (b), was in the original "this subtitle", meaning subtitle A (§§4001–4029) of title IV of div. A of Pub. L. 116–136, known as the Coronavirus Economic Stabilization Act of 2020, which is classified principally to this part. For complete classification of subtitle A to the Code, see section 4001 of Pub. L. 116–136, set out as a Short Title note under section 9001 of this title, and Tables.
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 31 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia certain defense articles and services. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the following proposed foreign military sale to the 

4 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is prohibited: 

5 (1) The sale of the following defense articles, 

6 including defense services and technical data, de7 scribed in Transmittal No. 18–31, submitted to Con8 gress pursuant to section 36(b) of the Arms Export 

9 Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(b)) and published in 

10 the Congressional Record on June 4, 2019: The pro11 posed sale of spare and repair parts, United States 

12 Government and contractor engineering, technical, 

13 and logistics support services, and other related ele-
2 

†SJ 31 ES 

1 ments of program support for the Tactical Air Sur2 veillance System aircraft program. 

Passed the Senate June 20, 2019. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 31 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proices. Saudi Arabia certain defense articles and serv- posed foreign military sale to the Kingdom of
Exhibit 23.2

------------------------------------------------------------------------------




                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


We consent to the use of our report dated November 2, 2007, except as to note 24
which is dated May 9, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements of
METRO, Inc. as of September 29, 2007 and for the year then ended, included in
the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. Annual Report to Shareholders,
which is incorporated in the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the US
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 8, 2008. We further consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos.
333-147935, 333-80347, and 333-36225) and in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (Nos. 333-147808, 333-119045, 333-78805, and 033-54863) of The Great
Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc. of our report dated November 2, 2007,
except as to note 24 which is dated May 9, 2008, relating to the consolidated
financial statements of METRO Inc. as of September 29, 2007 and for the year
then ended, included in The Great A&P Tea Company, Inc. Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended February 23, 2008 which is incorporated in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on
May 8, 2008.


                                                  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                                  Chartered Accountant
Montreal, Canada
May 15, 2008
#### § 524.76 Appeals of CIM classification.

An inmate may at any time appeal (through the Administrative Remedy Program) the inmate's classification as a CIM case. Inmates identified as Witness Security cases may choose to address their concerns directly to the Inmate Monitoring Section, Central Office, rather than use the Administrative Remedy Program.
Exhibit 23 (i)



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  Registration  Statement on
Form S-8 pertaining to the registration of 1,000,000 shares of American Standard
Companies  Inc.  common stock of our report dated February 13, 1996 with respect
to the  consolidated  financial  statements  and schedules of American  Standard
Companies  Inc.  incorporated  by reference in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended  December  31,  1996,  filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission.



New York, New York
November 18, 1997                                    /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
<PAGE>
§ 115.402 Auditor qualifications. ( a ) An audit shall be conducted by: ( 1 ) A member of a correctional monitoring body that is not part of, or under the authority of, the agency (but may be part of, or authorized by, the relevant State or local government);
( 2 ) A member of an auditing entity such as an inspector general's or ombudsperson's office that is external to the agency; or
( 3 ) Other outside individuals with relevant experience.
( b ) All auditors shall be certified by the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice shall develop and issue procedures regarding the certification process, which shall include training requirements.
( c ) No audit may be conducted by an auditor who has received financial compensation from the agency being audited (except for compensation received for conducting prior PREA audits) within the three years prior to the agency's retention of the auditor.
( d ) The agency shall not employ, contract with, or otherwise financially compensate the auditor for three years subsequent to the agency's retention of the auditor, with the exception of contracting for subsequent PREA audits.
#### ROBINSON & SONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. MISTER DONUT OF AMERICA, INC., Defendant.

Civ. A. No. 65-123.

United States District Court D. Massachusetts.

June 27, 1967.

Roger P. Stokey, Walker B. Comegys, Jr., Goodwin, Procter & Hoar, Boston,. Mass., for plaintiff.

Lane McGovern, Frank W. Crocker,. Ropes & Gray, Boston, Mass., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM

MURRAY, District Judge.

This matter came on to be heard upon, plaintiff’s motion to amend complaint,, and was argued by counsel. The com*100plaint alleges defendant’s violations of the antitrust laws (15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2, 14, 15, 26) resulting in injury to the plaintiff for which damages are asked.

The proposed addition of Count II, a claim that defendant has violated the Robinson-Patman Act [15 U.S.C. § 13 (a)], is not objected to.

Defendant objects to the addition of proposed Count III, a non-federal claim alleging breach of certain covenants of its franchise agreement with defendant made on October 7, 1958. The alleged breaches are in respect of (a) prices for the ingredients of the franchised product “in excess of the prices * * * charged other franchised dealers for the same” ingredients, and (b) exclusion of the plaintiff “from all [franchise] promotions and advertising in the Boston area.”

 The only basis for cognizance by this Court of the claim alleged in proposed Count III lies in the concept of “pendent jurisdiction.” See United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715, 86 S.Ct. 1130, 16 L.Ed.2d 218 (1966). All three claims are alleged to arise out of the business relations of the parties under the franchise agreement, and the plaintiff ordinarily would be expected to try all such claims in one judicial proceeding. The federal claims are substantial in that they charge the defendant with violations of federal law relating to (a) monopolies (Section 2, Sherman Act), (b) conspiracy in restraint of trade (Section 1, Sherman Act), (c) exclusive dealing and tie-in sales (Section 3, Clayton Act), and (d), in Count II, price discrimination under the Robinson-Patman Act. There is a “common nucleus of operative fact” present in the claims even though there is not complete identity of facts.

The basic dispute between the parties deals with their respective rights under the franchise agreement viewed in the light of the antitrust laws, with the non-federal claims raising questions of defendant’s right to discriminate against plaintiff in certain aspects of their contractual business relations arising out of the same agreement. The breach of contract claim is closely intertwined with aspects of antitrust policy. At the pleading stage a comparison of the amount of proof common to both claims cannot be accurately measured, nor can the quantum of proof required to support the non-federal claim. Sufficient appears, however, to suggest that the overlapping proof will be substantial, that judicial economy will be served, and that convenience and fairness to the parties will result from hearing all the claims in this proceeding.

The motion to amend is allowed.
**EXHIBIT 99.2- REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS**

 

The Audit Committeereviews with the independent auditors, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and the Company’s general counsel theresults of the independent auditor’s annual report on the Company’s financial statements. The Audit Committee selectsand engages the Company’s independent auditors and performs such additional functions as are necessary or prudent to fulfillthe Committee’s duties and responsibilities and reports its recommendations and findings to the full Board of Directors.

 

The Board of Directorshas adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, which is reviewed and reassessed for adequacy on an annual basis.

 

The Audit Committeehas reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for the year ended June 3, 2016 with management and the independentauditors. The Audit Committee has also discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by Public AccountingOversight Board AU 380. The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent auditors requiredby Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 and has discussed with the independent auditors their independence. The Audit Committeehas also discussed with the management of the Company and the independent auditors, such other matters and received such assurancesfrom them as deemed appropriate by the Audit Committee.

 

The Audit Committeehas considered whether the provision of the non-audit services performed by Carr, Riggs and Ingram, LLC is compatible with maintainingCarr, Riggs and Ingram, LLC’s independence.

 

The Audit Committee recognizes the importanceof maintaining the independence of the Company's independent registered public accountants. Consistent with its Charter, the AuditCommittee has evaluated Carr, Riggs and Ingram, LLC's qualifications, performance, and independence, including that of the leadaudit partner. In addition, Carr, Riggs and Ingram, LLC has provided the Audit Committee with a letter required by the applicablerequirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent registered public accountant's communicationswith the Audit Committee concerning independence and the Audit Committee has engaged in dialogue with Carr, Riggs and Ingram, LLCabout their independence.

 

The Audit Committeereviewed, approved and ratified the related party transactions set forth and described in “Certain Related Party Transactions”included in the Annual Report.

 

Based on the review and discussions referredto above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements referred to above beincluded in the Company’s Annual Report on form 10-K for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Submitted by the AuditCommittee of the Board of Directors of Golden Enterprises, Inc.

 

Members of the AuditCommittee: John S. P. Samford, Edward R. Pascoe, William B. Morton, Jr. and John S. Stein, III.
J.

Parraguirre Krehnovi stipulated to the sentence that was imposed. We are not convinced that the sentence imposed is so grossly disproportionate to the crime and Krehnovi's history of recidivism as to constitute cruel and unusual punishment. See Ewing V. California, 538 U.S. 11, 29 (2003) (plurality opinion). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge Clark County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 2
§ 2.10 Date service of sentence commences. ( a ) Service of a sentence of imprisonment commences to run on the date on which the person is received at the penitentiary, reformatory, or jail for service of the sentence: *Provided, however,* That any such person shall be allowed credit toward the service of his sentence for any days spent in custody in connection with the offense or acts for which sentence was imposed.
( b ) The imposition of a sentence of imprisonment for civil contempt shall interrupt the running of any sentence of imprisonment being served at the time the sentence of civil contempt is imposed, and the sentence or sentences so interrupted shall not commence to run again until the sentence of civil contempt is lifted.
( c ) Service of the sentence of a committed youth offender or person committed under the Narcotic Addict Rehabilitation Act commences to run from the date of conviction and is interrupted only when such prisoner or parolee: ( 1 ) Is on court-ordered bail;
( 2 ) Is in escape status;
( 3 ) Has absconded from parole supervision; or
( 4 ) Comes within the provisions of paragraph (b) of this section.
[42 FR 39809, Aug. 5, 1977, as amended at 47 FR 36634, Aug. 23, 1982]