alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 53 (Friday, March 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 15028]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6457]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7371]


Office of the Chief of Protocol; Gifts to Federal Employees From 
Foreign Government Sources Reported by Employing Agencies in Calendar 
Year 2009; Correction

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice; Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of State published a document in the Federal 
Register of January 18, 2011 concerning Gifts to Federal Employees from 
Foreign Government Sources Reported to Employing Agencies in Calendar 
Year 2009. The document contained the incorrect title of a foreign 
dignitary.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Solomon, Office of the Chief of 
Protocol (202) <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#516765667c606262627e023e3d3e3c3e3f35301102253025347f363e27">647-1333/<span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e2b18d8e8d8f8d8c8683a2b196839687cc858d94">[email protected]</span></a>.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of January 18, 2011 in FR Vol. 76, No. 11, 
page 2983, in the third entry in the third column under ``Identity of 
foreign donor and government'', the title of the President of the 
Constitutional Court of Korea is incorrect and should be changed from 
``President Kang-Kook Lee, Constitutional Court of Korea, Democratic 
People's Republic of Korea'' to read: ``President Kang-Kook Lee, 
Constitutional Court of Korea, Republic of Korea''.

    Dated: March 14, 2011.
Patrick F. Kennedy,
Under Secretary for Management, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-6457 Filed 3-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### §159d. Acceptance of General Philip Schuyler Mansion property

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to accept all or any portion of the General Philip Schuyler Mansion property, real and personal, situated at Schuylerville, New York, comprising approximately fifty acres.

(June 22, 1948, ch. 594, §2, 62 Stat. 571; Pub. L. 97–460, §3, Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2522.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1983—Pub. L. 97–460 struck out provisions which authorized the Secretary of the Interior to accept donations of land, interests in land, buildings, structures, and other property in Saratoga County which properties, together with the General Philip Schuyler Mansion property, were to become part of Saratoga National Historical Park. See sections 159f and 159g of this title.
§ 33.20 Fund availability. Section 407(a) of the Justice Assistance Act provides that 80 percent of the total amount appropriated for part D (block grants) and part E (discretionary grants) shall be allocated for block grants. ( a ) *Allocation to States.* Each participating state shall receive a base amount of $250,000 with the remaining funds allocated to each state on the basis of the state's relative share of total U.S. population. Section 407(a) of the Act. If a state does not elect to participate in the Act, the states allocation shall be awarded by the Bureau directly to local units of government and combinations of units of local government within the state. Section 407(d) of the Act.
( b ) *Allocation of funds within the State.* ( 1 ) Funds granted to the state are further subgranted by the state to state agencies and units of local government to carry out programs and projects contained in an approved application. Each state shall distribute to its local units of government, in the aggregate, a portion of the state's block grant funds equal to the local government share of total state and local criminal justice expenditures. Section 407(b) of the Act. In determining the portion to be distributed to local units, the most recent and complete data available from the Bureau of Justice Statistics of the U.S. Department of Justice shall be used unless the use of other data has been approved in advance by the Bureau of Justice Assistance.
( 2 ) To request approval of a distribution ratio other than that based on data of the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the head of the State Office must certify in writing to the Bureau of Justice Assistance that the ratio it proposes is a correct reflection of the local share of total state and local criminal justice expenditures and that the state has notified its major local governments of the request and informed them of the opportunity to contact the Bureau within 30 days, if they have any objections. The written request must also cite the expenditure data used to substantiate the proposed change.
( c ) *Allocation based on greatest need.* In distributing funds among urban, rural, and suburban units of local government, the state shall give priority to those jurisdictions with the greatest need. Section 407(b)(2) of the Act.
CHRISTOPHER

WEATHERSPOON

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 1125

Opinion filed August 4, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Christopher Weatherspoon, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIA M.

DENIED.

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 824 

To increase the number of States that may conduct Medicaid demonstration 

programs to improve access to community mental health services. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 14, 2019 

Ms. STABENOW (for herself, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. SCHUMER, Ms. ERNST, Mr. 

WYDEN, Mr. GARDNER, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. SULLIVAN, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, and Mr. TILLIS) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To increase the number of States that may conduct Medicaid 

demonstration programs to improve access to community 

mental health services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Excellence in Mental 

5 Health and Addiction Treatment Expansion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEM7 ONSTRATION PROGRAM. 

8 Section 223(d) of the Protecting Access to Medicare 

9 Act of 2014 (42 U.S.C. 1396a note) is amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 824 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (3)— 

2 (A) by striking ‘‘Not more than’’ and in3 serting ‘‘Subject to paragraph (8), not more 

4 than’’; and 

5 (B) by striking ‘‘2-year’’ and inserting ‘‘4- 

6 year’’; and 

7 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

8 paragraph: 

9 ‘‘(8) ADDITIONAL PROGRAMS.—In addition to 

10 the 8 States selected under paragraph (1), the Sec11 retary shall, not later than 1 year after the date of 

12 enactment of the Excellence in Mental Health and 

13 Addiction Treatment Expansion Act, select 11 

14 States (which shall not include any States selected 

15 under paragraph (1)) to participate in 2-year dem16 onstration programs that meet the requirements of 

17 this subsection and represent a diverse selection of 

18 geographic areas, including rural and underserved 

19 areas.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of GoAmerica, Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form
      10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission (the "Report"), I, Donald G. Barnhart, Chief Financial Officer of
      the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934;and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
      and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.





Dated:
      May 11,
      2006





/s/ Donald
              G.
              BarnhartDonald
              G. BarnhartChief
              Financial
              Officer


This
      certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
### §2106b. Use of money collected from States for fire suppression assistance

Any money collected from the States for fire suppression assistance rendered by the Forest Service on non-Federal lands not in the vicinity of National Forest System lands shall on and after October 21, 1998, be used to reimburse the applicable appropriation and shall remain available until expended as the Secretary may direct in conducting activities authorized by 16 U.S.C. 2101 note, 2101–2110, 1606, and 2111.

(Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(e) [title II], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–231, 2681–273.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1999, and also as part of the Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1999, and not as part of the Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Similar Provisions

Provisions similar to this section were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

Pub. L. 105–83, title II, Nov. 14, 1997, 111 Stat. 1577.

Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(d) [title II], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–181, 3009–208.

Pub. L. 104–134, title I, §101(c) [title II], Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321–156, 1321–185; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 104–140, §1(a), May 2, 1996, 110 Stat. 1327.

Pub. L. 103–332, title II, Sept. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 2524.

Pub. L. 103–138, title II, Nov. 11, 1993, 107 Stat. 1403.

Pub. L. 102–381, title II, Oct. 5, 1992, 106 Stat. 1402.

Pub. L. 102–154, title II, Nov. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1018.

Pub. L. 101–512, title II, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1943.

Pub. L. 101–121, title II, Oct. 23, 1989, 103 Stat. 727.

Pub. L. 100–446, title II, Sept. 27, 1988, 102 Stat. 1810.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 10ix


                                  AMENDMENT TO
                        GREAT LAKES CHEMICAL CORPORATION
                          1998 STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN

================================================================================


         This Amendment to the Great Lakes Chemical Corporation 1998 Stock
Compensation Plan (the "1998 Plan") is effective as of the 15th day of February
1999.

         WHEREAS, it is deemed desirable by the Board of Directors of Great
Lakes Chemical Corporation (the "Corporation") to amend the 1998 Plan in order
to permit the Board or its Compensation and Incentive Committee to authorize
certain actions of the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation.

         NOW, THEREFORE, Section 4 of the 1998 Plan is hereby amended by adding
the following immediately after the second sentence:

         NOT WITHSTANDING THE IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING SENTENCE OR ANY OTHER
         PROVISION HEREOF, THE BOARD OR THE COMMITTEE MAY FROM TIME TO TIME
         GRANT TO THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE CORPORATION AUTHORITY TO
         DETERMINE THE PERSON OR PERSONS TO WHOM AWARDS ARE TO BE GRANTED, THE
         NUMBER OF SHARES TO BE COVERED BY EACH SUCH AWARD, AND THE OTHER TERMS
         AND CONDITIONS OF EACH SUCH AWARD, WHICH TERMS AND CONDITIONS SHALL BE
         WITHIN THE LIMITATIONS SET FORTH IN THIS 1998 PLAN.




Resolution duly adopted by the Compensation and Incentive Committee of the Board
of Directors of the Corporation on February 14, 1999 and ratified by the Board
of Directors of the Corporation on February 15, 1999.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          84,093<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,973<F2>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 442,595
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        128,849<F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           210
<OTHER-SE>                                     298,847
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   442,595
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,382
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,473
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 844
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 54,453
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             54,453
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (4,562)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    49,891
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.38
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES RESTRICTED CASH OF $611
<F2>INCLUDES DEFERRED RENT RECEIVABLE OF $1,550
<F3>INCLUDES NOTE PAYABLE-INTERIM FINANCING OF $97,830
</FN>


</TABLE>
### §1404. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–522, title II, §204, Oct. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 1045, which required the Marine Mammal Commission to transmit to Congress, by January 31 of each year, a report including a description of the Commission's activities and accomplishments during the preceding year and all findings and recommendations made by and to the Commission pursuant to section 1402 of this title together with responses made to those recommendations, terminated, effective May 15, 2000, pursuant to section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, as amended, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance. See, also, page 176 of House Document No. 103–7.
### §241d. Exclusion of lands

The following area is excluded from the park: That portion of section 8 lying southwest of a line between the common corner of sections 8, 9, 16, and 17 and the northwest corner of the southwest quarter section 8; that portion of section 16 lying southwest of a line between the southeast corner southwest quarter and the northwest corner southwest quarter section 16; and section 17, township 147 north, range 100 west, fifth principal meridian, North Dakota.

(Mar. 24, 1956, ch. 94, §2, 70 Stat. 56.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of act Apr. 25, 1947, ch. 41, 61 Stat. 52, which comprises this subchapter.
### Fw: Revised draft of imlementation sections for SO 2 rule Lydia Wegman to: Tricia Crabtree 06/02/2010 06:47 PM

Lydia Wegman ----- Original Message ----- **From:** Lydia Wegman **Sent:** 05/30/2010 01:16 PM EDT **To:** "James_A ._Laity" <James_A._Laity@omb.eop.gov>; "Dominic Mancini" <Dominic_J._Mancini@omb.eop.gov> **Cc:** Gina McCarthy; "Janet McCabe" <mccabe.janet@epa.gov>; "Steve Page" <page.steve@epa.gov>; Kevin Mclean; "Larry Wallace" <wallace.larry@epa.gov>; Richard Wayland; James Hemby; "Scott Mathias" <mathias.scott@epa.gov>; Anna Wood; Padmini Singh; Mike Thrift; "Lydia Wegman" <wegman.lydia@epa.gov>; "Sara Schneeberg" <schneeberg.sara@epa.gov> **Subject:** Revised draft of imlementation sections for SO2 rule Jim and Dom, Attached are revisions to sections V and VI of the preamble which address the implementation provisions of the SO2 rule. Based on Gina and Dom's discussion on Friday, we have added language in several places indicating our intention to take public comment on guidance related to modeling and implementation, including section 110(a)(1) maintenance plans. We intend to add the same language on public comment at the end of the overview section in the implementation portion of the preamble, but will do that tomorrow or early Tuesday morning. We continue to believe that modeling is the best means of determining whether medium to large sources of SO2 meet the new one-hour standard and therefore have retained our language characterizing the use of modeling for these sources. Please let me know if you have any questions either by sending an e-mail or calling my cell at 919-621-3125. Thanks. Lydia Kevin McLean ----- Original Message ----- **From:** Kevin McLean **Sent:** 05/30/2010 12:30 PM EDT **To:** Lydia Wegman **Subject:** New draft attached
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Wayne R. Vollmar, Also Known as Wayne Vollmar, Deceased. David G. Vollmar, Respondent. J. Arthur Robbins, Nonparty Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 909]

In a probate proceeding, nonparty J. Arthur Robbins appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Orange County (Slobod, S.), dated February 9, 2005, as, in effect, sua sponte, directed him to pay an attorney’s fee as a sanction to the attorneys for the petitioner and the guardian ad litem in the total sum of $6,213.

Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, the notice of appeal is deemed an application for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted *(see*CPLR 5701 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and as a matter of discretion, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Surrogate’s Court, Orange County, for further proceedings in accordance herewith.

While the nonparty appellant was afforded a reasonable opportunity to be heard, the Surrogate’s Court improvidently exercised its discretion by, in effect, sua sponte directing him to pay an attorney’s fee as a sanction without complying with the procedure mandated by 22 NYCRR part 130. Accordingly, we reverse the order insofar as appealed from, and remit the matter to the Surrogate’s Court, Orange County, to specify in a written decision the conduct upon which the award was based, the reasons why it found the conduct to be frivolous or without good cause, and the reasons the sanction was fixed in the amount indicated *(see*22 NYCRR 130-1.2; *Sholes v Meagher,*100 NY2d 333 [2003]; *Rennie-Otote v Otote,*15 AD3d 380 [2005]; *Khoury v Khoury,*280 AD2d 453, 454 [2001]; *Miller v DeCongilio,*269 AD2d 504 [2000]; *Gossett v Firestar Affiliates,*224 AD2d 487 [1996]). Adams, J.P., Goldstein, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23.1
  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
  We have issued our report dated September 28, 2011, accompanying the consolidated financial statements in the Annual Report of Gilman Ciocia, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Gilman Ciocia on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-50089, effective April 14, 1998 and File No. 333-14915, effective October 28, 1996).
 /s/ Sherb & Co, LLPCertified Public Accountants
 New York, New York
 September 28, 2011
*

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not

precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 97-30850

Summary Calendar

________________________

BETTY P. McCLENDON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RANDY SMITH; CLEO CRUTCHFIELD; 

THE BOGALUSA HOUSING AUTHORITY,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(96-CV-4054-N)

________________________________________________________________________________

April 21, 1998

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The appellant,BettyMcClendon, awhite female, appealsthe district court’s entryofsummary

judgment against her on her claims against her employer, the Bogalusa Housing Authority, Randy

Smith, a white male who is the director of the Housing Authority, and Cleo Crutchfield, an AfricanAmerican male who is the chairman of the Housing Authority. In her complaint, McClendon argues

that the defendants have engaged in a prolonged campaign to replace her with an African-American

employee. In support of her claim, McClendon has advanced the following arguments: 1) she claims

that since Smith became director, almost all personnel hired by the Housing Authority have been

African-American; 2) she claimsthat the defendants arranged for a resident ofthe Housing Authority

to attack her in her office; 3) she claims that Smith, in an attempt to frighten her into resigning, has
2

ordered that a security door, apparently installed after the aforementioned assualt, be tied open; 4)

she claims that she has been ignored and denied the opportunity to do meaningful work because she

is white; and 5)she claimsthatshe was denied theCivilService position of “administrative secretary,”

a position that apparently has never existed at the Housing Authority, because she is white. Plaintiff

asserts four claims in her complaint: 1) a claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as

amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 based on the defendants’ alleged racial

discrimination; 2) a substantive due process claim under § 1983 based on the Housing Authority’s

alleged policy of “intimidation and social isolation”; 3) a claim for intentional infliction of emotional

distress under Louisiana law; and 4) a state law claim for retaliation for asserting a right secured by

Lousiana law. After a de novo review of the record, we affirm for essentially the same reasons set

forth by the district court in its Order and Reasons, dated July 31, 1997.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Teleconnect Inc. (the
“Company”) for the quarter ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer and President and the principal accounting and financial
officer of the Company each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





February
12, 2010





/s/
      Dirk L. BenschopDirk
      L. Benschop, Director, Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial
      Officer and
                principal
      accounting officer