alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  SBA District Offices 
-  Louisiana 
-  Doing Business In The Louisiana District 

# Doing business in the Louisiana District

## Business requirements

SBA’s Business Guide lists the requirements needed to start, grow, and expand your business. Since laws and taxes vary by state, here’s what you need to do before starting your business in our area.

### Business name and registration

Register your business name with the county clerk where your business is located. If you are a corporation, you will also need to register with the Secretary of State.

### Business licensing and zoning

Licenses are typically administered by a variety of state and local departments. It is important to consider zoning regulations when choosing a site for your business. Contact the local business license office where you plan to locate your business.

### Taxes

Louisiana Taxpayer Assistance Centers1555 Poydras St.New Orleans, LA 70112Phone: 800-829-1040

Louisiana Department of Revenue1450 Poydras St., Suite 800New Orleans, LA 70112Phone: 855-307-3893

### Health and safety

Louisiana Workforce Commission1001 N. 23rd St.Baton Rouge, LA 70802Phone: 225-342-3111

OSHA Baton Rouge Area Office9100 Bluebonnet Centre Blvd., Suite 201Baton Rouge, LA 70809Phone: 225-298-5458

## State small business profiles

Need information on the local business landscape? SBA's Office of Advocacy has the latest demographic and statistics on local small business economic activity.

##  Local assistance

          Find counselors        

## SBA lending in our area

-  Loan programs              Learn more about SBA's 7(a) loans, 504 loans, and microloans that you can use for your business.                  Find a loan 
-  Lender Match              Describe your business needs and get matched with an SBA-backed lender in your area.                  Get matched with a lender 
-  Lending activity reports              View 7(a) and 504 lending activity reports from our district.                  View lending reports 

## Additional local resources

###         State and local governments      

                    -  State of Louisiana Website 
                    -  Louisiana Secretary of State: Business Services 

###         Community organizations      

                    -  Louisiana State University 
                    -  Tulane University 
                    -  The University of New Orleans 
                    -  University of Holy Cross 
                    -  New Orleans Online 

##           Download our guide to SBA resources        

Learn about the opportunities available for small businesses nationwide.

Download English version PDFDownload Spanish version PDF
EXHIBIT 31.1 Certification of CEO Pursuant to
Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, David Guthrie, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 of Consolidated Energy, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting. Date:  August 21, 2006 /s/ David Guthrie David Guthrie President and Principal Executive Officer
#### William R. White, as Superintendent of Banks of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Toney A. Hardy, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ. [See 180 Misc. 63.]
### §77n. Contrary stipulations void

Any condition, stipulation, or provision binding any person acquiring any security to waive compliance with any provision of this subchapter or of the rules and regulations of the Commission shall be void.

(May 27, 1933, ch. 38, title I, §14, 48 Stat. 84.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of Securities and Exchange Commission, with certain exceptions, to Chairman of such Commission, see Reorg. Plan No. 10 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3175, 64 Stat. 1265, set out under section 78d of this title.
### §17m. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, act June 23, 1936, ch. 735, §3, 49 Stat. 1895, related to consent of Congress to agreements between States; when agreements effective. See section 100504(b) of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
### **CHAPTER 72—RECREATIONAL HUNTING SAFETY**

Sec.
5201.
Obstruction of a lawful hunt.
5202.
Civil penalties.
5203.
Other relief.
5204.
Relationship to State and local law and civil actions.
5205.
Regulations.
5206.
Rule of construction.
5207.
Definitions.
#### Vincent J. Vita et al., Respondents, v New York Waste Services, LLC, et al., Appellants.

[824 NYS2d 177]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.), dated November 2, 2005, as granted those branches of the plaintiffs’ motion which were pursuant to CPLR 3211 (b) to dismiss the sixth, seventh, eighth, and eleventh affirmative defenses.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

On their motion, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (b) to dismiss the sixth, seventh, eighth, and eleventh affirmative defenses, the plaintiffs bore the burden of demonstrating that those defenses were without merit as a matter of law *(see Santilli v Allstate Ins. Co.,*19 AD3d 1031, 1032 [2005]; *Town of Hempstead v Lizza Indus.,*293 AD2d 739, 740 [2002]). Contrary to the defendants’ contention, the Supreme Court properly granted the motion with respect to those defenses based on the exclusivity provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Law *(see*Workers’ Compensation Law §§ 11, 29 [6]), since the plaintiffs sustained their burden as to those defenses. In this regard, the plaintiffs submitted overwhelming affidavit and documentary evidence demonstrating that the injured plaintiff was employed by and performed services for Allied Waste Services, Inc. (hereinafter Allied Waste), and its subsidiary, Island Waste Services, at the time he was injured by a vehicle owned by the defendant New York Waste Services, LLC (hereinafter New York Waste), and operated by the defendant Gene R. Brewer, an employee of New York Waste. In response, the defendants merely came forward with conclusory assertions that the injured plaintiff was an employee of New York Waste, and their affidavits and other submissions were devoid of any evidence that New York Waste was an alter ego of Allied Waste *(see e.g. Longshore v Davis Sys. of Capital Dist.,*304 AD2d 964 [2003]; *Rosenburg v Angiuli Buick,*220 AD2d 654 [1995]; *Kaplan v Bayley Seton Hosp.,*201 AD2d 461 [1994]). Similarly, the defendants pre*560sented no evidence suggesting that the two corporations were engaged in a joint venture (see *generally Buchner v Pines Hotel,*87 AD2d 691 [1982], *affd*58 NY2d 1019 [1983]) or that the injured plaintiff was a special employee of New York Waste (see *generally Thompson v Grumman Aerospace Corp.,*78 NY2d 553 [1991]; *Kramer v NAB Constr. Corp.,*282 AD2d 714 [2001]; *Martin v Baldwin Union Free School Dist.,*271 AD2d 579 [2000]). Finally, the defendants’ vague and unsubstantiated reference to an alleged internal accounting practice of Allied Waste was insufficient to raise a genuine factual issue with regard to whether the injured plaintiff was employed by New York Waste. Therefore, the dismissal of the subject affirmative defenses was proper. Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Mastro and Fisher, JJ., concur.
§ 301.202 Determination of work-relatedness. ( a ) When the institution safety manager receives notice, or has reason to believe, a work-related injury may result in time lost from the work assignment, he or she shall present BP-140, Pages 1 and 2 (with the appropriate sections completed) to the Institution Safety Committee at the Committee's next regularly scheduled meeting. The Safety Committee shall make a determination of the injury's work-relatedness based on the available evidence and testimony. The determination shall be recorded on BP-140, Page 2, a copy of which shall be provided to the inmate.
( b ) A determination of work-relatedness for purposes of awarding lost-time wages is not confirmation on the validity of any subsequent claim to receive compensation for work-related physical impairment or death.
[55 FR 9296, Mar. 12, 1990. Redesignated at 59 FR 2667, Jan. 18, 1994]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-2049

UNITED PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MARY ROE, individually and as a parent and natural guardian on behalf of Jane 

Doe, a minor under the age of 18,

 Defendant - Appellant,

and

JOSEPH STEPHEN HUNTER, SR.; ROSE WADFORD HUNTER,

 Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Beaufort. David C. Norton, District Judge. (9:16-cv-02926-DCN)

Submitted: June 26, 2019 Decided: July 10, 2019

Before WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aaron E. Edwards, Lawrence E. Richter, Jr., THE RICHTER FIRM, LLC, Mt. Pleasant, 

South Carolina, for Appellant. Mary D. LaFave, CROWE LAFAVE, LLC, Columbia, 
2

South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Mary Roe and Jane Doe (collectively, “Roe/Doe”) appeal the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment 

to United Property & Casualty Insurance (“UPC”). The district court concluded that 

UPC had no duty to defend or indemnify Roe/Doe’s claims against Joseph Stephen 

Hunter, Sr., who allegedly sexually abused Jane Doe for nearly ten years, and Rose 

Wadford Hunter, who they claim knew of and facilitated the abuse. We have reviewed 

the parties’ briefs and joint appendix and find no reversible error. 

Roe/Doe do not dispute the district court’s findings as to Stephen Hunter; they 

challenge only the court’s grant of summary judgment on their negligence and 

defamation claims against Rose Hunter. The district court properly accepted Roe/Doe’s 

factual allegations from the underlying state complaint and granted summary judgment 

applying settled state law. See Mitcheson v. Harris, 955 F.2d 235, 239 (4th Cir. 1992). 

The court correctly concluded that UPC had no duty to defend and indemnify Roe/Doe’s

negligence claims against Rose Hunter, noting that the policy’s exclusion for damages 

“arising out of” sexual abuse covered all such claims regardless of the relevant actor or 

theory of liability. Sphere Drake Ins. Co. v. Litchfield, 438 S.E.2d 275, 277 (S.C. Ct. 

App. 1993). Finally, the district court correctly held UPC had no duty to defend and 

indemnify Roe/Doe’s defamation claims against Rose Hunter, since Roe/Doe themselves 

alleged that Rose Hunter’s actions were intentional. See Miller v. Fid.-Phx. Ins. Co., 

231 S.E.2d 701, 702 (S.C. 1977). 
4

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Editorial Note on Part 0
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

§ 0.138 Federal Bureau of Investigation, Drug Enforcement Administration, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, Bureau of Prisons, Federal Prison Industries, Immigration and Naturalization Service, United States Marshals Service, Office of Justice Programs, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Executive Office for United States Attorneys, Executive Office for United States Trustees. ( a ) The Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, the Director of the Bureau of Prisons, the Commissioner of Federal Prison Industries, the Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization Service, the Director of the United States Marshals Service, the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Justice Programs, the Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review, the Director of the Executive Office for United States Attorneys, and the Director of the Executive Office for United States Trustees are, as to their respective jurisdictions, authorized to exercise the power and authority vested in the Attorney General by law to take final action in matters pertaining to the employment, direction, and general administration (including appointment, assignment, training, promotion, demotion, compensation, leave, awards, classification, and separation) of personnel in General Schedule grades GS-1 through GS-15 and in wage board positions, but excluding therefrom all attorney and U.S. Marshal positions. Such officials are, as to their respective jurisdictions, authorized to exercise the power and authority vested in the Attorney General by law to employ on a temporary basis experts or consultants or organizations thereof, including stenographic reporting services (5 U.S.C. 3109(b)).
( b ) All personnel actions taken under this section shall be subject to post-audit and correction by the Assistant Attorney General for Administration.
[Order No. 2250-99, 64 FR 46846, Aug. 27, 1999, as amended by Order No. 2650-2003, 68 FR 4927, Jan. 31, 2003]
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Private  Access,  Inc., on
Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  B.
Stephen Bailey,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge  and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-26-1998
<CASH>                                         282,375
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               32,322,955
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 35,593,471
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,306,014
<PP&E>                                      19,866,851
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              92,802,907
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       30,768,058
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,715,069
<OTHER-SE>                                  50,626,597
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                92,802,907
<SALES>                                    190,330,346
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           190,330,346
<CGS>                                      144,849,376
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              144,849,376
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            37,300,148
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,559,962
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,815,745
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,400,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,415,745
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,415,745
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.47
        

</TABLE>
| Replacement Fund(Adviser)                                                                           | Share Classes                    | Replaced Fund(Adviser)                                                 | Share Classes  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
| PIMCO EqS Pathfinder PortfolioTM(Pacific Investment Management Company LLC, or “PIMCO”) | Institutional ClassAdvisor Class | Mutual Global Discovery Securities Fund(Franklin Mutual Advisers, LLC) | Class 1Class 2 |

----

----
### §404b. Administration, protection, and development; Federal Power Act inapplicable; minimum area

The administration, protection, and development of the aforesaid park shall be exercised under the direction of the Secretary of the Interior by the National Park Service, subject to the provisions of the Act of August 25, 1916, entitled "An Act to establish a National Park Service, and for other purposes," 1 as amended: Provided, That the provisions of the Federal Power Act [16 U.S.C. 791a et seq.] shall not apply to this park: And provided further, That the minimum area to be administered and protected by the National Park Service shall be, for the said Mammoth Cave National Park, twenty thousand acres: Provided further, That no general development of said area shall be undertaken until a major portion of the remainder in such area, including all the caves thereof, shall have been accepted by said Secretary, and he shall have established a schedule of fees for admission to such caves.

(May 25, 1926, ch. 382, §3, 44 Stat. 636; May 14, 1934, ch. 282, §1, 48 Stat. 775.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Act of August 25, 1916, entitled "An Act to establish a National Park Service, and for other purposes,", referred to in text, is act Aug. 25, 1916, ch. 408, 39 Stat. 535, known as the National Park Service Organic Act, which enacted sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 of this title and provisions set out as a note under section 100101 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs. Sections 1 to 4 of the Act were repealed and restated as section 1865(a) of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and section 100101(a), chapter 1003, and sections 100751(a), 100752, 100753, and 102101 of Title 54 by Pub. L. 113–287, §§3, 4(a)(1), 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3094, 3260, 3272. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables. For disposition of former sections of this title, see Disposition Table preceding section 100101 of Title 54.

The Federal Power Act, referred to in text, was in the original the "Act approved June 10, 1920, known as the Federal Water Power Act," and was redesignated as the Federal Power Act by section 791a of this title. The Federal Power Act is act June 10, 1920, ch. 285, 41 Stat. 1063, and is classified generally to chapter 12 (§791a et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 791a of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1934—Act May 14, 1934, inserted "and he shall have established a schedule of fees for admission to such caves," and changed phrase "including all the caves thereof" to its present position instead of following "twenty thousand acres".

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

1 See References in Text note below.