alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3471. Payments for land removed from production for conservation purposes; authorization of appropriations

(a) The Secretary of Agriculture may enter into contracts to provide financial assistance in the form of payments to owners and operators of cropland located in counties where the soil normally freezes to a depth of at least four inches annually who remove such land from agricultural production for a period not to exceed one year for the purpose of installing enduring conservation measures which involve excavation of the soil. The payments under such contracts shall be in such amounts as determined by the Secretary to be necessary to effectuate the purposes of this subchapter but shall not exceed an amount equal to the number of acres of cropland removed from agricultural production for such purpose multiplied by 50 per centum of the typical annual rent, as determined by the Secretary, paid for similar land in the county. Financial assistance may not be provided under this section with respect to any conservation measure without the approval of the soil and water conservation district board for the district in which the land is located, and may not, in the aggregate, be provided in any year with respect to more than one-half of 1 per centum of the cropland in any county.

(b) There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this section, such sums to remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 97–98, title XV, §1552, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1344.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original "this subtitle", meaning subtitle J (§§1550–1554) of title XV of Pub. L. 97–98, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1344, which enacted this subchapter and section 2273 of Title 7, Agriculture, and amended section 1236 of Title 30, Mineral Lands and Mining. For complete classification of subtitle J to the Code, see Tables.
### §392. Acquisition of privately owned lands

The governor of the Territory of Hawaii is authorized to acquire, at the expense of the Territory of Hawaii, by exchange or otherwise, all privately owned lands lying within the boundaries of the Hawaii National Park as defined by section 391 of this title, and all necessary perpetual easements and rights-of-way, or roadways, in fee simple, over or to said land or any part thereof, but the provisions of section 73 of an Act entitled "An Act to provide a government for the Territory of Hawaii," approved April 30, 1900, as amended by an Act approved May 27, 1910, relating to exchanges of public lands shall not apply in the acquisition, by exchange, of the privately owned lands herein referred to.

(Feb. 27, 1920, ch. 89, §§1, 2, 41 Stat. 452, 453.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 73 of an Act approved April 30, 1900, referred to in text, was classified to sections 663, 664, 665 to 677b, 1509 to 1512 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions. Those sections were omitted from the Code as obsolete.

#### Codification

Section 1 of act Feb. 27, 1920, is the source of that portion of this section preceding "but the provisions of section 73"; remainder being from section 2 of that Act.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Hawai‘i Volcanoes National Park

Designation of portion of Hawaii National Park situated on island of Hawaii as Hawai‘i Volcanoes National Park, effective Sept. 22, 1961, see section 391d of this title.

#### Haleakalā National Park

Establishment of detached portion of Hawaii National Park lying on island of Maui as Haleakalā National Park, effective July 1, 1961, see section 396b of this title.

#### Extension of Application

Act Apr. 11, 1928, ch. 359, §2, 45 Stat. 426, extended provisions of this section and made them applicable to lands added to the park and included within boundary established by section 391 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Admission of Hawaii as State

Admission of Hawaii into the Union was accomplished Aug. 21, 1959, on issuance of Proc. No. 3309, Aug. 21, 1959, 24 F.R. 6868, 73 Stat. c74, as required by sections 1 and 7(c) of Pub. L. 86–3, Mar. 18, 1959, 73 Stat. 4, set out as notes preceding section 491 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.
Exhibit






December 31, 2015


Re:    Renewal of Amended and Restated Retention Agreement
Dear Shawn:
This letter is to serve as your notification that Ply Gem Industries, Inc. has elected to execute its Renewal Term right under your current Amended and Restated Retention Agreement dated November 7, 2008 for a period of one year.  As such, all applicable rights and terms as outlined in your Amended and Restated Retention Agreement will remain in effect through December 31, 2016.
Please sign this letter in the space provided below as your acknowledgement and agreement of this Renewal Term agreement and return this original to me, and retain a copy for your own records.
	
		
	 
	Sincerely,

	 
	 

	 
	PLY GEM INDUSTRIES, INC.

	 
	 

	 
	By:  /s/ Gary E. Robinette

	 
	Name:  Gary E. Robinette

	 
	Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	Acknowledged and Agreed:
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	/s/ Shawn K. Poe


	 

	Shawn K. Poe
HomeLatest FilingsPrevious Page

    - SEC Home  »
    - Search the Next-Generation EDGAR System  »
    - Company Search  »
    - Current Page

699 WALNUT STREETSUITE 1350DE MOINES IA 50309-3942         

699 WALNUT STREETSUITE 1350DE MOINES IA 50309-3942         610-425-3400

VENERABLE INSURANCE & ANNUITY Co CIK#: 0000836658 (see all company filings)
SIC: 6311 - LIFE INSURANCEState location: IA | State of Inc.: **IA** | Fiscal Year End: 1231formerly: GOLDEN AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE CO /NY/ (filings through 2003-11-14)formerly: ING USA ANNUITY & LIFE INSURANCE CO (filings through 2014-08-27)formerly: VOYA INSURANCE & ANNUITY Co (filings through 2018-10-15)(CF Office: 02 Finance)Get **insider transactions** for this **reporting owner**.File Number: **812-15479****Filter Results****Search Within Files**Filing Type:Prior to: (YYYYMMDD)Ownership?includeexcludeonlyLimit Results Per Page10 Entries                     20 Entries                     40 Entries                     80 Entries                     100 Entries                  Enter keywordsSearchItems 1 - 4   RSS FeedFilingsFormatDescriptionFiling DateFile/Film NumberAPP ORDR Documents40-APP OrderAcc-no: 9999999997-24-000247 (IC Act)  Size: 140 KB            2024-02-20812-1547924602466            APP NTC Documents40-APP NoticeAcc-no: 9999999997-24-000153 (IC Act)  Size: 128 KB            2024-02-20812-1547924529080            40-APP/A Documents**[Amend]** Application for exemption and other relief filed under the Investment Company Act of 1940Acc-no: 0000923495-23-000088 (IC Act)  Size: 127 KB            2023-10-13812-15479231329058            40-APP DocumentsApplication for exemption and other relief filed under the Investment Company Act of 1940Acc-no: 0000923495-23-000061 (IC Act)  Size: 110 KB            2023-06-27812-15479231049057            https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgarHome | Search the Next-Generation EDGAR System | Previous PageModified 07/18/2014
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 17 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for the lying in state 

of the remains of the last Medal of Honor recipient of World War 

II, in order to honor the Greatest Generation and the more than 

16,000,000 men and women who served in the Armed Forces of the 

United States from 1941 to 1945. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 16, 2019 

Mr. MANCHIN (for himself and Mrs. CAPITO) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for the 

lying in state of the remains of the last Medal of Honor 

recipient of World War II, in order to honor the Greatest 

Generation and the more than 16,000,000 men and 

women who served in the Armed Forces of the United 

States from 1941 to 1945. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•SCON 17 IS 

1 SECTION 1. HONORING THE LAST SURVIVING MEDAL OF 

2 HONOR RECIPIENT OF WORLD WAR II. 

3 (a) USE OF ROTUNDA.—The individual who is the 

4 last surviving recipient of the Medal of Honor for acts per5 formed during World War II shall be permitted to lie in 

6 state in the rotunda of the Capitol upon death, if the indi7 vidual (or the next of kin of the individual) so elects. 

8 (b) IMPLEMENTATION.—The Architect of the Capitol, 

9 under the direction of the President pro tempore of the 

10 Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

11 shall take the necessary steps to implement subsection (a). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### John C. Short *&*Co. v. Michael D. Coffeen.

Assignor of *note—measure of damages in recovery against.*In a suit by the assignee against the assignor of a promissory note, the measure of damages is the amount paid tor the note to the assignor, with interest, but the recovery in no case can exceed the amount of the note and interest; and when the note requires the maker to pay an attorney’s fee, in case of suit, the assignor, it seems, is not liable for such fee in a suit against him.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Vermilion county; the Hon. Oliver L. Davis, Judge, presiding.

Messrs. Henry & Penwell, for the appellants.

Messrs. Mallory & Blackburn, for the appellee.

Mr. Justice Craig

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was an action brought by appellee against appellants, as endorsers of a promissory note, which read as follows:

> “Danville, Ill., *May*6, 1873.

> “Ten months after date, for value, I promise to pay John C. Short §150, at the Exchange Bank of John C. Short & Co., *246Danville, Illinois, with interest, at the rate of ten per cent, from date, and, in addition thereto, an attorney’s fee of ten per cent on amount due, as liquidated damages, in case of the collection thereof by suit at law or otherwise, to be added to and made a part of the amount due, or of the judgment.

> “F. M. Welsh.”

John C. Short endorsed the note to appellants, and they endorsed it to appellee.

A jury having been waived, a trial was had before the court, and judgment rendered in favor of appellee for $186.89, which exceeded the amount of the note and interest $17.

We regard the evidence before the court as sufficient to authorize a recovery against appellants, as endorsers of the note ; but the judgment rendered is too large.

In an action brought by the endorsee of a promissory note against the endorser, the measure of damages is the amount paid by the assignee to his assignor, with interest.

The recovery, however, can, in no case, exceed the amount of the nóte and interest. *Raplee*v. *Morgan,*2 Scammon, 564; *Shœffer*v. *Hodges,*54 Ill. 337; *Munn*v. *Commission Co.*15 Johns. 55.

It was therefore error for the court to render judgment in favor of the endorsee against the endorsers, for $17 in excess of the amount of the note and interest, for which the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.

*Judgment reversed.*
§ 24.204 Time for submission of application. ( a ) An application must be filed no later than 30 days after final disposition of the proceeding. If review or reconsideration is sought or taken of a decision as to which an applicant believes it has prevailed, action on the award of fees shall be stayed pending final disposition of the underlying controversy.
( b ) Final disposition means the later of: ( 1 ) The date on which the final agency decision is issued,
( 2 ) The date on which a petition for rehearing or reconsideration is disposed of, or
( 3 ) The date of final resolution of the proceeding, such as settlement or voluntary dismissal, which is not subject to a petition for rehearing or reconsideration.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Equality Investments,  Inc.,
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  B.
Stephen Bailey,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge  and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quaterly Report on Form 10-QSB of North Shore
Capital IV, Inc., (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2003, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Gerard Werner, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the
dates presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the
periods presented.

Dated: October 3, 2005


/s/ Gerard Werner
Chief Executive Officer
October 3, 2005


This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
#### Jason Gulliher *et al. v.*The People of the State of Illinois.

*Witness—impeachment 6y contradicting his statements.*If a witness, whether defendant in a criminal proceeding or not, has sworn wilfully and knowingly false on any material matter, his whole evidence may be rejected, so far as it is not corroborated. But the mere fact that he is contradicted as to some material matter, is not enough to warrant the rejection of his testimony, unless the jury may believe he has sworn falsely and knew it to be false.

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Knox county, the Hon. Arthur A. Smith, Judge, presiding.

Messrs. Williams, McKenzie & Calkins, for the plaintiffs in error.

Mr. J. J. Tunnicliff, State’s Attorney, for the People.

*146Hr. Justice Walker

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was an indictment against plaintiffs in error, for robbery, upon which they were convicted.

On the trial, Foote was sworn as a witness, and testified to matters which, if true, tended to rebut the proofs of the prosecution in material matters relating to himself and to his co-defendant. Tie was, however, in this contradicted by other witnesses.

The court gave to the jury the following instruction:

“ The court instructs the jury that while, under the statute, the defendants are permitted to testify, their credibility is left to the jury; and if the jury believe that the defendant, Alfred F. Foote, has sworn wilfully false, or been contradicted on a material point, then the jury have a right to disregard his whole testimony, unless corroborated by other testimony.”

Exception was taken by each of the plaintiffs in error to this ruling of the court.

The instruction was clearly erroneous. When analyzed, it plainly tells the jury that, “if they believe, from the evidence, that Alfred F. Foote has been contradicted on a material point, then the jury have a right to disregard his whole testimony, unless corroborated by other testimony.” This is not the law. The defendant in a criminal prosecution, in this respect, when he testifies, must be tried, as a witness, by the same rules which prevail as to other witnesses.

If the witness, whether defendant or otherwise, is shown, by proofs, to have sworn wilfully and knowingly false on any material matter, his evidence may be rejected, so far as it is not corroborated. Of course his interest in the result goes to his credibility, which the jury are to weigh. The mere fact, however, that he is contradicted as to some material matter, is not enough to warrant the rejection of his evidence altogether, unless the jury believe that, as to the matter in which he has been thus contradicted, he has sworn falsely, and knew his evidence was false.

*147There is no force in the other objections urged by plaintiffs in error.

For this error, the judgment and verdict must be set aside, and the cause remanded for a new trial.

*Judgment reversed.*
#### § 540.40 Purpose and scope.

The Bureau of Prisons encourages visiting by family, friends, and community groups to maintain the morale of the inmate and to develop closer relationships between the inmate and family members or others in the community. The Warden shall develop procedures consistent with this rule to permit inmate visiting. The Warden may restrict inmate visiting when necessary to ensure the security and good order of the institution.

[45 FR 44232, June 30, 1980, as amended at 58 FR 39095, July 21, 1993]
### §410aaa–26. Utility rights-of-way

Nothing in this part shall have the effect of terminating any validly issued right-of-way or customary operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement activities in such right-of-way, issued, granted, or permitted to the Metropolitan Water District pursuant to the Boulder Canyon Project Act (43 U.S.C. 617–619b), which is located on lands included in the Joshua Tree National Park, but outside lands designated as wilderness under section 601(a)(2). Such activities shall be conducted in a manner which will minimize the impact on park resources. Nothing in this part shall have the effect of terminating the fee title to lands or customary operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement activities on or under such lands granted to the Metropolitan Water District pursuant to the Act of June 18, 1932 (47 Stat. 324), which are located on lands included in the Joshua Tree National Park, but outside lands designated as wilderness under section 601(a)(2). Such activities shall be conducted in a manner which will minimize the impact on park resources. The Secretary shall prepare within one hundred and eighty days after October 31, 1994, in consultation with the Metropolitan Water District, plans for emergency access by the Metropolitan Water District to its lands and rights-of-way.

(Pub. L. 103–433, title IV, §406, Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4488.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Boulder Canyon Project Act, referred to in text, is act Dec. 21, 1928, ch. 42, 45 Stat. 1057, which is classified generally to subchapter I (§617 et seq.) of chapter 12A of Title 43, Public Lands. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 617t of Title 43 and Tables.

Section 601(a)(2), referred to in text, is section 601(a)(2) of Pub. L. 103–433, which enacted provisions listed in a table of Wilderness Areas set out under section 1132 of this title.

Act of June 18, 1932 (47 Stat. 324), referred to in text, is not classified to the Code.
### §364. Investigation of applicant for lease or contract

The Secretary of the Interior, before executing any lease to bathhouses or bathhouse sites in the park or contracts for the use of hot water for bathhouses outside said park, may make due investigation to ascertain whether the person, persons, or corporation applying for such lease or contract are not, directly or indirectly, interested in any manner whatever in any other bathhouse, lease, interest, or privilege at or near Hot Springs, Arkansas, or whether he or they belong to any pool, combination, or association so interested, or whether he or they are members or stockholders in any corporation so interested, or, if a corporation, whether its members or any of them are members or stockholders of any other corporation or association interested in any other bathhouse, lease, interest, or privilege as aforesaid, and in order to arrive at the facts in any such case he is authorized to send for persons and papers, administer oaths to witnesses, and require affidavits from applicants; and any such person making a false oath or affidavit in the premises shall be deemed guilty of perjury, and, upon conviction, subject to all the pains and penalties of perjury under the statutes of the United States; and whenever, either at the time of leasing or other time it appears to the satisfaction of the said Secretary that such interest in other bathhouse, lease, interest, or privilege exists, or at any time any pool or combination exists between any two or more bathhouses or he deems it for the best interests of the management of the Hot Springs National Park and waters, or for the public interest, he may refuse such lease, license, permit, or other privilege, or forfeit any lease or privilege wherein the parties interested have become otherwise interested as aforesaid.

(Mar. 3, 1891, ch. 533, §4, 26 Stat. 843; Mar. 4, 1921, ch. 161, §1, 41 Stat. 1407.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Hot Springs National Park" substituted in text for "Hot Springs Reservation" pursuant to act Mar. 4, 1921.
<PAGE> 
<TABLE>
                                                             Chase 1999-S2
                                                      30 Yr Fixed Rate Collateral


<S>                              <C>                            <C>
Principal Balance                           $450,000,000               +/- 5%

Gross WAC                                   7.172%                     +/- 5 bps

WAM                                         357                        +/- 2 months

Wtd. Ave LTV                                73.6%                      +/- 2%

Property Type                               Single Family & PUDs       90% Min
                                            Condos                     5% Max
                                            Coops                      3% Max
                                            2-4 Family                 4% Max

Owner Occupied                              95% Min

Full Documentation                          85% Min

Cash Out Refi                               30.4%                      34% Max

Geographics                                 44% California Max

Expected Subordination                      4.25%                      +/- 0.50%

Settlement                                  Feb 1999

Delivery Variance                           +/- 5%








                                                        ALL NUMBERS APPROXIMATE


          THIS INFORMATION IS FURNISHED TO YOU SOLELY BY CHASE SECURITIES, INC. AND NOT BY CHASE MORTGAGE FINANCE
          CORPORATION ("CMFC") OR ANY OF ITS AFFILIATES.  CHASE SECURITIES, INC. IS NOT ACTING AS CMFC'S AGENT.  THE
          INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN WILL BE SUPERSEDED BY THE DESCRIPTION OF THE MORTGAGE LOANS CONTAINED IN THE
          PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT.

</TABLE>